Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021/08/04 - Regular Meeting Agenda Packet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dor ennis Michael REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem August 4, 2021 Lynne B. Kennedy 10500 Civic Center Drive MembeCouncil: of the City Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 rvo,� Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD—CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY-SUCCESSOR AGENCY—PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). CLOSED SESSION — 4:30 P.M. TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Al. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. — (CITY) A2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE'S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5-20CV02506JGBSP - (CITY) A3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - (CITY) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 1 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." A4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12963 WHITTRAM AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-14. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. - (CITY) A5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0229-291-22 AND 0229-291-23. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. - (CITY) A6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 2 CASES; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED LETTERS FROM TWO ENTITIES THREATENING LITIGATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 982 . THE LETTERS ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. - CITY B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION E. RECESS — Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 2 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Chef Eugenio "Geno" Rodriguez in Honor of his Outstanding Efforts and Continued Service to the Healthy RC C.A.S.A. Cooking Class for Over 10 years. B2. Presentation of Rancho Cucamonga's Ranking — Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 3 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." D. CONSENT CALENDAR - D1. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,869,868.92 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to 7 Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of$3,905,174.15 Dated July 12, 2021 Through July 25, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of$341.04 Dated July 12, 2021 Through 17 July 25, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of Cougar Court, Related to Case No. DRC2016-00038 and Previously Subdivided Parcels of Land in the Low (L) District 19 in relation to Parcel Map 16884, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D4. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $15,973 from the Municipal Utility Fund 22 (Fund 705) for the Comar Inc. Power Upgrade Project. (CITY). D5. Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC (CO18-103) for Fiber Optic Project Management and Design Services for 24 Fiscal Year 2021/22. (CITY) D6. Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20301 Located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard 26 Related to Case No. SUBTPM20301. (CITY). D7. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located at the Southwest Corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue at 9393 Arrow Route per the Improvement Agreement Related to Case No. 28 DRC2018-00139, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY). D8. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2021-00438, Located at 31 8763 Brilliant Lane. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-87, 2021-88, 2021-89) (CITY). D9. Consideration of Reimbursement Payment for Underground Utilities Improvements Related to Case No. DRC2006-01012 and Authorization of an Appropriation of$76,880. (CITY) 49 D1 0.Consideration of the Purchase of Asphalt Materials on an As-Needed Basis from Holliday Rock 52 of Upland, California in an amount Not to Exceed $165,000 for FY 2021/22. (CITY) D11.Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract CO 19-187 with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Citywide Tree Maintenance Services During FY 2021/2022 and Authorize the City Manager 54 to Renew the Contract Annually. (CITY) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 4 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 56 2021-081) (CITY). D13.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Sidepath, Inc. for Data Center 63 Support Services in the total amount not to exceed $200,000. (CITY) D1 4.Consideration to Award Contract to Golden State Construction for the Civic Center COVID and 65 ADA Improvement Project. (CITY) D15.Consideration to Approve and Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District for Property Commonly Known as 69 APN 0208-151-24 Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Road, and Appropriate American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds for the Purchase as Indicated in the Staff Report. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1. Consideration of Resolutions Denying Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, and a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 72 SUBTPM20164. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-082, 2021-083, 2021-084) (CITY) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. A Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage Facility Located at 9910 6th 287 Street in an Existing Industrial Building within the General Industrial (GI) District—APN:0209- 211-42 and 43 (DRC2021-00213). This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-085) (CITY) G2. Continued Public Hearing for Consideration of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 — Alan Smith for Arbor Express Car Wash — A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project-Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium 339 (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non-Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208-291-01 and 0208-291-02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to a Proposed Car Wash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-045) (CITY) (Continued from June 2, 2021 City Council Meeting) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 5 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Analysis of the Current State of Parking for the Area of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino 979 Road. (CITY) H2. Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 984 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-086) (CITY). I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) 993 Annual Business Meeting. (CITY) 12. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) 13. INTERAGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS: K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy-Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 6 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Oak MoneyGeek"s 2021 survey ranks Rancho Cucamonga BEST -CITIES � among the top cities in the country for Black women FOR BLACK to overcome economic challenges. WOMEN 2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA bAA All-America City _FA.1JV 1 I I I I F 0 0 0 51 Ll U01t4tol Loriil L01 2 0 V 2 0 MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially The 25 Best Cities for Black Women City Final Score 1. Southfield MI 100.0 MoneyGeek ranked 200 cities with populations 2. New Rochelle, NY 97.4 greater than 65,,000 from the best to the worst for Black women . 3. Missouri City, TX 90.6 4. Alexandria, VA 86.6 5. Pembroke Pines, FL 85.6 6. Inglewood CA 85.4 7. Fairfield, CA 85.2 RANCHO 8. Sandy Springs, GA 82.4 CUCAM4NGA City of Rancho Cucamonga ranked 9. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 82.2 the Nation Alt-America City 10. Grand Prairie, TX 80.8 �,aricHwi.c av�c i roc an 2 0 * 2 0 1 1 MoneyGeek's 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Analysis based on 8 factors : • Safety • Black Population • Educational Attainment • Poverty Rates �l � Income � y `�a 1 Employment � � i • Health Insurance • Homeownership RANCHO CUCAMONGA All-America CiV 20 * 20 MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Hide Sources Rancho Cucamonga Population by Race US Census 2019 ACS 5-Year Survey (Table 1303002) Population by Race Hispanic Non-Hispanic Race Population . Percentage White 105,303 59.70% Asian 22,905 12.99% Black or African American 17,635 10.00% Race Some Other Race 17,433 9.88% Two or More Races 11 ,573 6.56% American Indian and Alaska Native 948 0.54% 0000 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 582 0.33% RANCHO CUCAMONGA white r � Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander All-America City Some Other Race Two or More Races NATsC)i Al,(:IV](,'[FA itJF 2 O 2 O MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Calteles for Black Women • to Flourish Financially Household Types by Race Percentage of households. Scope: households in Califomia and Rancho Cucamonga TM Rancho Cucamonga — California - Other Jon-F rei,l l One- Person ' r.. , 1Single Ma1 ingle Fma a rrid 0% 40% 0% 0 % 0% 40% 60% Count Asian 34 66 % 61428 - _ 4 Hispanic 44% % 12 . 1 040 RANCHO a UCAM NG hits � 4 % 25. 8k i edI3eel % 48% 21204 All-America CiV Black 3 7 % _ 43% 51393 NAflCNAL{.IVI(;1_ ;IJF MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Poverty by Age and Gender in Rancho Cucamonga , CA AVERAGE 7.94% s% rM L L1 s5 5 6 - 11 12 - 14 15 16 - 17 18- 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75— RANCHo CUCAM4NGA � Female Male 2013 2014 2015 2016 zov 2018 2019 All-AmericaCiV NA710NrlLL:IVlC.1FACiUF 1 I I I I F MoneyGeek's 2021 Best Cities for Black Women � to Flourish Financially College Graduates By Race # � S o Scope: pop ula tio n of Califomia and Rancho Cucamonga Female Male vp California E RI . Rancho Cucamonga , � ■ Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar- 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% M F Whitei 35 . 5%�"" 37S 6 °/a 8 ,D54 8 ,653 0000 Black 39 . 6°(a 27, % 1 , 333 21326 RANCHOoN Asian 52 .4% 62 . 0 42387 4 , 293 CUCAM�i GA Hispanic2 '14 ,21,10 7 .6% I 3P206 4r744 All-America City Other ' 2�1..2% 18 .6% 12361 1 ,905 tlllll � � ♦ � ♦ � � n �r � n MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Employment by Race #15 pope: population of California and Rancho Cucamonga pip Female Male California --- � dft Rancho Cucamonga � t � Shaded bar tips show excess over facing far. 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% % White 67.2% 73.G 10.E lc Asian 62.0% 73 67.4°la Hispanic ' 6 275 6 8- 654% Mixed 6ur'41/o 68.0 644% RANCHO cucannoNGa Other 6o.o°r� s�. 63.9�0 Black 653% 58-9% 62. 1 % All-America City VATI(NVALCIV]C I FAA Uf= !YJ Ll 0 Eel 1061 K4141 Ley,Ll N L03 0 1 1 AV MoneyGeek's 2021 Best C 'It 'les for Black Women • • $53 K to Flour'Ish F $75K $75,000.UO Average 1,910.00 Median Household I n o b Face �# 8 Ste,-000. Scope: households in Cafifomia and Rancho Cup n a 553.021.G: � Rancho Cucamonga California S45,000.&O - $Ok $20k $40k $60 $80k % Asian 107" % S30,000. Non-Hispanic White 105% Pacific Black Lati no Native White a Ion e, Two -ormire Asian Isla nder American not Lati r, All White 1 . 1k 101 % Median Household Income by Race/Ethnicity 2 � -All k /0 Hispanic k (10 B ac S 5. I 4% RANCHO Other $75. 1.— k 4% U AM N GA IN Hawaiian � $63.80% 7aa.(., Alll-AmerisaCfly NATIC-MI,(:IV](,'l FA.A JF MoneyGeek"s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially Thank you Questions or Comments ? RANCHO CUCAMONGA All-AmericaVV 1 n I I I I I � ! A O ♦ O 2 0 # 2 0 ti NONRR � a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,869,868.92 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of$3,905,174.15 Dated July 12, 2021 Through July 25, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,018,823.22 and $851,045.70 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $3,491,399.73 and $413,774.42 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00012750 07/12/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 139.00 579.11 718.11 *** AP 00012751 07/12/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,597.22 0.00 1,597.22 AP 00012752 07/12/2021 BSN SPORTS LLC 1,155.97 0.00 1,155.97 AP 00012753 07/12/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 76.77 0.00 76.77 AP 00012754 07/12/2021 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,754.62 0.00 1,754.62 AP 00012756 07/12/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 82,521.70 11,056.00 93,577.70 *** AP 00012757 07/12/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2,445.90 0.00 2,445.90 AP 00012758 07/12/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 6,166.84 0.00 6,166.84 AP 00012759 07/12/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,676.87 0.00 1,676.87 AP 00012760 07/12/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 157.24 157.24 AP 00012761 07/12/2021 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 26.08 0.00 26.08 AP 00012762 07/12/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 531.53 4,747.96 5,279.49 *** AP 00012763 07/12/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 2,034.53 0.00 2,034.53 AP 00012764 07/12/2021 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 0.00 38.79 AP 00012765 07/12/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 74,746.34 0.00 74,746.34 AP 00012766 07/12/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,765.61 0.00 1,765.61 AP 00012767 07/14/2021 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 4,508.44 4,508.44 AP 00012768 07/14/2021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 12,652.57 0.00 12,652.57 AP 00012769 07/14/2021 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 114,750.00 0.00 114,750.00 AP 00012770 07/14/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 1,953.99 0.00 1,953.99 AP 00012771 07/14/2021 FEHR&PEERS 0.00 2,445.38 2,445.38 AP 00012772 07/14/2021 PROMOTIONS TEES&MORE 9,753.05 0.00 9,753.05 AP 00012773 07/14/2021 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 123,502.75 0.00 123,502.75 AP 00012774 07/14/2021 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 274,791.00 0.00 274,791.00 AP 00012775 07/14/2021 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,281.03 0.00 10,281.03 AP 00012776 07/14/2021 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION INFO 102.16 0.00 102.16 AP 00012777 07/14/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,612.40 0.00 23,612.40 AP 00012778 07/14/2021 RCCEA 1,552.50 0.00 1,552.50 AP 00012779 07/14/2021 RCPFA 12,709.24 0.00 12,709.24 AP 00012780 07/14/2021 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 AP 00012781 07/19/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 366.53 366.53 AP 00012782 07/19/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 13,389.62 0.00 13,389.62 AP 00012783 07/19/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 29,781.79 0.00 29,781.79 AP 00012784 07/19/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 5,283.39 0.00 5,283.39 AP 00012785 07/19/2021 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 114.07 114.07 AP 00012786 07/19/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 53.88 53.88 AP 00012787 07/19/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 0.00 1,011.34 1,011.34 AP 00012790 07/19/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 7,475.37 517.43 7,992.80 *** AP 00012791 07/19/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 81,289.65 0.00 81,289.65 AP 00012792 07/19/2021 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 958.54 0.00 958.54 AP 00012793 07/19/2021 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00012794 07/19/2021 VISTA PAINT 2,158.43 0.00 2,158.43 AP 00012795 07/19/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 13,038.52 0.00 13,038.52 AP 00012796 07/19/2021 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 250.70 0.00 250.70 AP 00012797 07/21/2021 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 192,333.50 192,333.50 AP 00012798 07/21/2021 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 7,117.50 7,117.50 AP 00012799 07/21/2021 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 3,161.00 0.00 3,161.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page&ne: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00012800 07/21/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 3,077.01 7,942.14 11,019.15 *** AP 00012801 07/21/2021 FEHR&PEERS 3,615.00 0.00 3,615.00 AP 00012802 07/21/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 52,213.15 1,506.00 53,719.15 *** AP 00012803 07/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00012804 07/22/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 3,272.38 0.00 3,272.38 AP 00012805 07/22/2021 ECS IMAGING INC 3,600.00 0.00 3,600.00 AP 00012806 07/22/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 0.00 4,285.60 4,285.60 AP 00012807 07/22/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 90.33 90.33 AP 00012808 07/22/2021 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 538.67 538.67 AP 00012809 07/22/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 1,035.42 0.00 1,035.42 AP 00012810 07/22/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 48,807.38 0.00 48,807.38 AP 00012811 07/22/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 232.89 0.00 232.89 AP 00418812 07/14/2021 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 2,721.00 0.00 2,721.00 AP 00418813 07/14/2021 AIR&HOSE SOURCE INC 195.49 0.00 195.49 AP 00418814 07/14/2021 ASSI SECURITY 14,965.25 0.00 14,965.25 AP 00418815 07/14/2021 AUTO&RV SPECIALISTS INC 122.22 0.00 122.22 AP 00418816 07/14/2021 BILL&WAGS INC 281.25 0.00 281.25 AP 00418817 07/14/2021 BISHOP COMPANY 336.78 0.00 336.78 AP 00418818 07/14/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 21,899.18 0.00 21,899.18 AP 00418819 07/14/2021 C T&T CONCRETE PAVING INC 17,914.50 0.00 17,914.50 AP 00418820 07/14/2021 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 6,313.50 0.00 6,313.50 AP 00418821 07/14/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 7,043.90 0.00 7,043.90 AP 00418822 07/14/2021 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00418823 07/14/2021 CHAMPION AWARDS&SPECIALTIES 38.79 0.00 38.79 AP 00418824 07/14/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 1,570.00 0.00 1,570.00 AP 00418825 07/14/2021 CHAVEZ,MARCO 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00418826 07/14/2021 CHINO MOWER&ENGINE SERVICE 868.22 0.00 868.22 AP 00418827 07/14/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,406.72 0.00 2,406.72 AP 00418828 07/14/2021 CIRCLEPOINT 13,600.80 0.00 13,600.80 AP 00418829 07/14/2021 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 11,025.00 0.00 11,025.00 AP 00418830 07/14/2021 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 343.72 0.00 343.72 AP 00418831 07/14/2021 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL&DATA INC 228,201.40 0.00 228,201.40 AP 00418832 07/14/2021 D&K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,795.59 0.00 2,795.59 AP 00418833 07/14/2021 DATA ARC LLC 4,831.96 0.00 4,831.96 AP 00418834 07/14/2021 DAVID S MASON INC 3,578.40 0.00 3,578.40 AP 00418835 07/14/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00418836 07/14/2021 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 278.00 0.00 278.00 AP 00418837 07/14/2021 EMPLOYEE ACTIVITY COMMITTEE 364.53 0.00 364.53 AP 00418838 07/14/2021 ERGON ASPHALT&EMULSIONS INC 486.06 0.00 486.06 AP 00418839 07/14/2021 EVERDE GROWERS 794.64 0.00 794.64 AP 00418840 07/14/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 1,715.01 0.00 1,715.01 AP 00418841 07/14/2021 FIRST AID 2000 2,458.50 0.00 2,458.50 AP 00418842 07/14/2021 FUEL SERV 1,671.96 7,790.00 9,461.96 *** AP 00418843 07/14/2021 GLOBALSTAR USA 159.32 0.00 159.32 AP 00418844 07/14/2021 GRAINGER 15,991.58 729.75 16,721.33 *** AP 00418845 07/14/2021 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 3,568.41 0.00 3,568.41 AP 00418846 07/14/2021 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout PageAne: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418847 07/14/2021 HERRARTE,MARYANN 150.41 0.00 150.41 AP 00418848 07/14/2021 HMC ARCHITECTS 3,460.00 0.00 3,460.00 AP 00418849 07/14/2021 HOYT LUMBER CO,S M 35.87 0.00 35.87 AP 00418850 07/14/2021 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 28,195.99 0.00 28,195.99 AP 00418851 07/14/2021 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE&SERVICE CO 1,287.60 0.00 1,287.60 AP 00418852 07/14/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 4,776.00 0.00 4,776.00 AP 00418853 07/14/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 2,527.06 0.00 2,527.06 AP 00418854 07/14/2021 ITRON INC 7,494.48 0.00 7,494.48 AP 00418855 07/14/2021 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT INC 575.00 0.00 575.00 AP 00418856 07/14/2021 KIM,JIN 247.83 0.00 247.83 AP 00418857 07/14/2021 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOCIATES INC 1,595.00 0.00 1,595.00 AP 00418858 07/14/2021 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 1,055.01 0.00 1,055.01 AP 00418859 07/14/2021 LABCORP EMPLOYER SERVICES INC 1,886.00 0.00 1,886.00 AP 00418860 07/14/2021 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 131,940.56 0.00 131,940.56 AP 00418861 07/14/2021 LEE,ANDREW 132.27 0.00 132.27 AP 00418862 07/14/2021 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 221.32 0.00 221.32 AP 00418863 07/14/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 687.45 0.00 687.45 AP 00418864 07/14/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 9,789.30 0.00 9,789.30 AP 00418865 07/14/2021 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 188.10 0.00 188.10 AP 00418866 07/14/2021 MCI 36.93 0.00 36.93 AP 00418867 07/14/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 800.44 0.00 800.44 AP 00418868 07/14/2021 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00418869 07/14/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 712.83 0.00 712.83 AP 00418870 07/14/2021 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC 150.92 0.00 150.92 AP 00418871 07/14/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 18.49 0.00 18.49 AP 00418872 07/14/2021 NATIONAL CNG&FLEET SERVICE 565.00 0.00 565.00 AP 00418873 07/14/2021 NAUMANN HOBBS MATERIAL HANDLING 75.45 0.00 75.45 AP 00418874 07/14/2021 NAZAROV,ROMAN 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00418875 07/14/2021 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN&GRAPHICS 112.02 0.00 112.02 AP 00418876 07/14/2021 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 10,642.60 0.00 10,642.60 AP 00418877 07/14/2021 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 6,961.16 0.00 6,961.16 AP 00418878 07/14/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 25,312.50 0.00 25,312.50 AP 00418879 07/14/2021 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 1,737.93 0.00 1,737.93 AP 00418880 07/14/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 2,997.37 0.00 2,997.37 AP 00418881 07/14/2021 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 4,969.92 0.00 4,969.92 AP 00418882 07/14/2021 PORTO,JOSEPH 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00418883 07/14/2021 POSTAL PERFECT 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00418884 07/14/2021 PRIVATE BRAND MFG 172.44 0.00 172.44 AP 00418885 07/14/2021 RAINBOW BOLT&SUPPLY INC 527.37 0.00 527.37 AP 00418886 07/14/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 44.95 0.00 44.95 AP 00418887 07/14/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 2,952.80 0.00 2,952.80 AP 00418888 07/14/2021 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 679.27 0.00 679.27 AP 00418889 07/14/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,119.50 0.00 7,119.50 AP 00418890 07/14/2021 SASSOON,LORI 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00418891 07/14/2021 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 1,875.00 237.00 2,112.00 *** AP 00418892 07/14/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 2,668.84 0.00 2,668.84 AP 00418893 07/14/2021 SIGN SHOP,THE 545.18 0.00 545.18 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page fine: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418894 07/14/2021 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 18,101.89 44.80 18,146.69 *** AP 00418895 07/14/2021 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 3,153.49 0.00 3,153.49 AP 00418896 07/14/2021 SNAWDER,RICK 0.00 345.00 345.00 AP 00418897 07/14/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 14,213.74 0.00 14,213.74 AP 00418898 07/14/2021 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 0.00 10,995.16 10,995.16 AP 00418899 07/14/2021 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,481.80 0.00 1,481.80 AP 00418900 07/14/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 1,110.00 670.00 1,780.00 *** AP 00418901 07/14/2021 TAI,IAN 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00418902 07/14/2021 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 2,680.00 0.00 2,680.00 AP 00418903 07/14/2021 TIREHUB LLC 1,339.53 0.00 1,339.53 AP 00418904 07/14/2021 TORO TOWING 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00418905 07/14/2021 C V W D 392.90 0.00 392.90 AP 00418906 07/14/2021 C V W D 0.00 306.79 306.79 AP 00418907 07/14/2021 C V W D 0.00 327.00 327.00 AP 00418908 07/14/2021 C V W D 0.00 216.62 216.62 AP 00418909 07/14/2021 C V W D 0.00 46.00 46.00 AP 00418910 07/14/2021 FRONTIER COMM 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00418911 07/14/2021 FRONTIER COMM 89.89 0.00 89.89 AP 00418917 07/14/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,983.09 3,606.93 21,590.02 *** AP 00418918 07/14/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,584.78 0.00 5,584.78 AP 00418919 07/14/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,760.42 0.00 10,760.42 AP 00418920 07/14/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15,916.46 0.00 15,916.46 AP 00418921 07/14/2021 U-HAUL CO OF ARIZONA 42.00 0.00 42.00 AP 00418922 07/14/2021 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.00 117.30 117.30 AP 00418923 07/14/2021 ULINE 272.13 0.00 272.13 AP 00418924 07/14/2021 UTILIQUEST 1,340.00 0.00 1,340.00 AP 00418925 07/14/2021 UTLEY,KATHI 117.00 0.00 117.00 AP 00418926 07/14/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 238.73 0.00 238.73 AP 00418927 07/14/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 49.48 0.00 49.48 AP 00418928 07/14/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 5,315.95 0.00 5,315.95 AP 00418929 07/14/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 6,387.75 0.00 6,387.75 AP 00418930 07/14/2021 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 4,752.00 0.00 4,752.00 AP 00418931 07/14/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1,071.71 0.00 1,071.71 AP 00418932 07/14/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 12,469.71 0.00 12,469.71 AP 00418933 07/14/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 17,817.08 0.00 17,817.08 AP 00418934 07/14/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 90,210.00 0.00 90,210.00 AP 00418935 07/14/2021 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,149.06 0.00 1,149.06 AP 00418936 07/14/2021 WESTERN STATES TRANSMISSIONS 2,812.75 0.00 2,812.75 AP 00418937 07/14/2021 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,622.07 0.00 1,622.07 AP 00418938 07/14/2021 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 2,482.71 0.00 2,482.71 AP 00418939 07/14/2021 WILSON&BELL AUTO SERVICE 3,903.08 0.00 3,903.08 AP 00418940 07/14/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 408.15 0.00 408.15 AP 00418941 07/14/2021 ALTUM GROUP,THE 12,404.32 0.00 12,404.32 AP 00418942 07/14/2021 BAKER&TAYLOR LLC 186.65 0.00 186.65 AP 00418943 07/14/2021 BLESSED FARM 498.00 0.00 498.00 AP 00418944 07/14/2021 CAL FIRE 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00418945 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 1,854.90 0.00 1,854.90 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page f1me: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418946 07/14/2021 CAMBRIDGE SEVEN ASSOCIATES INC 97,779.00 0.00 97,779.00 AP 00418947 07/14/2021 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 187.50 0.00 187.50 AP 00418948 07/14/2021 CONVERGEONE INC 2,140.00 0.00 2,140.00 AP 00418949 07/14/2021 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 62.70 0.00 62.70 AP 00418950 07/14/2021 CROSBY,SHAWN 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00418951 07/14/2021 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,288.80 0.00 1,288.80 AP 00418952 07/14/2021 EAN SERVICES LLC 0.00 914.48 914.48 AP 00418953 07/14/2021 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00418954 07/14/2021 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 218.06 218.06 AP 00418955 07/14/2021 GEO PLASTICS INC 5,231.11 0.00 5,231.11 AP 00418956 07/14/2021 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 436.39 0.00 436.39 AP 00418957 07/14/2021 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2,549.65 0.00 2,549.65 AP 00418959 07/14/2021 C V W D 32,956.39 0.00 32,956.39 AP 00418960 07/14/2021 FRONTIER COMM 1,521.82 612.59 2,134.41 *** AP 00418961 07/14/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00418962 07/14/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 504.90 0.00 504.90 AP 00418963 07/14/2021 ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN'S MUSEUMS 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00418964 07/14/2021 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00418965 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00418966 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52 AP 00418967 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 153.26 0.00 153.26 AP 00418968 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00418969 07/14/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00418970 07/14/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,143.24 0.00 1,143.24 AP 00418971 07/14/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 40,244.87 0.00 40,244.87 AP 00418972 07/14/2021 DIRECTV 186.24 0.00 186.24 AP 00418973 07/14/2021 ENVISIONWARE INC 2,285.80 0.00 2,285.80 AP 00418974 07/14/2021 GOVQA LLC 18,970.00 0.00 18,970.00 AP 00418975 07/14/2021 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 15,843.20 0.00 15,843.20 AP 00418976 07/14/2021 IVANTI INC 32,360.00 0.00 32,360.00 AP 00418977 07/14/2021 LANE,TRAVIS 2,278.85 0.00 2,278.85 AP 00418978 07/14/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 31.65 0.00 31.65 AP 00418979 07/14/2021 NETFILE 12,600.00 0.00 12,600.00 AP 00418980 07/14/2021 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00418981 07/14/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00418982 07/14/2021 SALAS,EDGAR A 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00418983 07/14/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CLERK OF THE BOARD OF 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00418984 07/14/2021 SBPEA 2,479.57 0.00 2,479.57 AP 00418985 07/14/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00418986 07/14/2021 STATE TREASURERS OFFICE 135,000.00 0.00 135,000.00 AP 00418987 07/14/2021 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00418988 07/14/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 14,249.94 0.00 14,249.94 AP 00418989 07/14/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,103.96 0.00 1,103.96 AP 00418990 07/14/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00418991 07/14/2021 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC 26,750.00 0.00 26,750.00 AP 00418992 07/20/2021 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 3,863.75 0.00 3,863.75 AP 00418993 07/21/2021 A TO Z DATABASES 5,870.00 0.00 5,870.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page 12hne: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418994 07/21/2021 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP 42,567.55 0.00 42,567.55 AP 00418995 07/21/2021 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 6,348.37 0.00 6,348.37 AP 00418996 07/21/2021 ANIXTER INC 80,128.29 0.00 80,128.29 AP 00418997 07/21/2021 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 25,866.00 0.00 25,866.00 AP 00418998 07/21/2021 C V W D 419.90 0.00 419.90 AP 00418999 07/21/2021 CACEO 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00419000 07/21/2021 CALIFA GROUP 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00419001 07/21/2021 CALIX INC 3,715.83 0.00 3,715.83 AP 00419002 07/21/2021 CHASING 7 DREAMS 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00419003 07/21/2021 COLD DUCK PRODUCTIONS INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00419004 07/21/2021 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING LLC 381.50 0.00 381.50 AP 00419005 07/21/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00419006 07/21/2021 DUDE SOLUTIONS INC 16,890.00 0.00 16,890.00 AP 00419007 07/21/2021 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 75,640.50 0.00 75,640.50 AP 00419008 07/21/2021 ENDRUN TECHNOLOGIES LLC 7,801.84 0.00 7,801.84 AP 00419009 07/21/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.95 0.00 30.95 AP 00419010 07/21/2021 FIRST AID 2000 1,407.71 0.00 1,407.71 AP 00419011 07/21/2021 FRASURE,MICHAEL 119.00 0.00 119.00 AP 00419012 07/21/2021 FRONTIER COMM 787.06 661.99 1,449.05 *** AP 00419013 07/21/2021 FRONTIER COMM 141.59 330.38 471.97 *** AP 00419014 07/21/2021 GOGOV APPS INC 12,444.00 0.00 12,444.00 AP 00419015 07/21/2021 HLP INC 234.50 0.00 234.50 AP 00419016 07/21/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00419017 07/21/2021 ICMA 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00419018 07/21/2021 JAIME CAMPOS 563.00 0.00 563.00 AP 00419019 07/21/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,756.80 0.00 1,756.80 AP 00419020 07/21/2021 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,482.10 0.00 5,482.10 AP 00419021 07/21/2021 MOHAMMAD TAHA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00419022 07/21/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 44.64 44.64 AP 00419023 07/21/2021 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 11,136.00 0.00 11,136.00 AP 00419024 07/21/2021 PEP BOYS 58.19 0.00 58.19 AP 00419025 07/21/2021 PERSONAL EXPOSURE REPORTING 0.00 940.00 940.00 AP 00419026 07/21/2021 QUADIENT-4715 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 AP 00419027 07/21/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 144.92 0.00 144.92 AP 00419028 07/21/2021 SHRED PROS 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00419030 07/21/2021 SOLARWINDS INC 9,893.00 0.00 9,893.00 AP 00419031 07/21/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 1,022.89 1,022.89 AP 00419032 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,332.06 0.00 1,332.06 AP 00419033 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.78 0.00 15.78 AP 00419034 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 412.82 0.00 412.82 AP 00419035 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54,633.89 0.00 54,633.89 AP 00419036 07/21/2021 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 644.45 0.00 644.45 AP 00419037 07/21/2021 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 33.59 33.59 AP 00419038 07/21/2021 TAHA,MOHAMMAD 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00419039 07/21/2021 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 230.00 0.00 230.00 AP 00419040 07/21/2021 TUTOR.COM INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00419041 07/21/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page fine: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00419042 07/21/2021 VENTEK INTERNATIONAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00 AP 00419043 07/21/2021 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00419044 07/21/2021 WELLS,ERIC 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00419045 07/21/2021 ZHENG,CAIYUN 87.45 0.00 87.45 AP 00419046 07/21/2021 AAA ELECTRIC MOTOR SALES 913.28 0.00 913.28 AP 00419047 07/21/2021 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,209.15 0.00 2,209.15 AP 00419048 07/21/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00419049 07/21/2021 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00419050 07/21/2021 BERN MARIE'S PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,061.53 0.00 1,061.53 AP 00419051 07/21/2021 BLESSED FARM 110.00 0.00 110.00 AP 00419052 07/21/2021 C V W D 8,462.08 0.00 8,462.08 AP 00419059 07/21/2021 C V W D 112,169.45 828.63 112,998.08 *** AP 00419060 07/21/2021 CALIF DEPT OF TAX&FEE ADMINISTRATION 889.38 522.89 1,412.27 *** AP 00419061 07/21/2021 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX&FEE ADMINISTRATION 5,455.00 0.00 5,455.00 AP 00419062 07/21/2021 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 1,416.91 0.00 1,416.91 AP 00419063 07/21/2021 CONVERGEONE INC 7,320.00 0.00 7,320.00 AP 00419064 07/21/2021 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING LLC 237.48 0.00 237.48 AP 00419065 07/21/2021 CURTIS J DAHLE ARCHITECT 12,567.68 0.00 12,567.68 AP 00419066 07/21/2021 DATA ARC LLC 4,781.53 0.00 4,781.53 AP 00419067 07/21/2021 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 6,244.74 0.00 6,244.74 AP 00419068 07/21/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 49.00 49.00 AP 00419069 07/21/2021 DIRECTV 88.99 0.00 88.99 AP 00419070 07/21/2021 FORTIN LAW GROUP 8,347.55 0.00 8,347.55 AP 00419071 07/21/2021 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,137.00 0.00 1,137.00 AP 00419072 07/21/2021 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 985.91 0.00 985.91 AP 00419073 07/21/2021 GRAINGER 588.29 0.00 588.29 AP 00419074 07/21/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 0.00 85.34 85.34 AP 00419075 07/21/2021 HENRY SCHEIN INC 0.00 2,514.56 2,514.56 AP 00419076 07/21/2021 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP,THE 919.00 0.00 919.00 AP 00419077 07/21/2021 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 494.81 0.00 494.81 AP 00419078 07/21/2021 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 4,767.50 4,767.50 AP 00419079 07/21/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 23,199.00 23,199.00 AP 00419080 07/21/2021 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 382.05 0.00 382.05 AP 00419081 07/21/2021 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 8,250.00 0.00 8,250.00 AP 00419082 07/21/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 159.69 0.00 159.69 AP 00419083 07/21/2021 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 3,205.00 0.00 3,205.00 AP 00419084 07/21/2021 LEI,PONFEI 49.53 0.00 49.53 AP 00419086 07/21/2021 LOWES COMPANIES INC 3,806.16 1,508.66 5,314.82 *** AP 00419087 07/21/2021 MAGANA,MAURICIO 404.00 0.00 404.00 AP 00419088 07/21/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 25,618.37 0.00 25,618.37 AP 00419089 07/21/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 152,611.73 2,428.71 155,040.44 *** AP 00419090 07/21/2021 MARLINK INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00419091 07/21/2021 MCCOY,IDA MAE 38.72 0.00 38.72 AP 00419092 07/21/2021 MCI 36.93 0.00 36.93 AP 00419093 07/21/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 927.48 0.00 927.48 AP 00419094 07/21/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 4,140.14 0.00 4,140.14 AP 00419095 07/21/2021 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 633.46 0.00 633.46 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page iiine: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00419096 07/21/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 590.92 590.92 AP 00419097 07/21/2021 NINYO&MOORE 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00419098 07/21/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 3,595.63 0.00 3,595.63 AP 00419099 07/21/2021 ONTRAC 89.05 0.00 89.05 AP 00419100 07/21/2021 P I P PRINTING 865.07 0.00 865.07 AP 00419101 07/21/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 62,474.00 0.00 62,474.00 AP 00419102 07/21/2021 PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP 0.00 646.50 646.50 AP 00419103 07/21/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 0.00 23,759.68 23,759.68 AP 00419104 07/21/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 1,199.14 1,199.14 AP 00419105 07/21/2021 PRO-WEST&ASSOCIATES INC 6,000.26 0.00 6,000.26 AP 00419106 07/21/2021 REDMOND SCHWARTZ MARK DESIGN INC 7,350.00 0.00 7,350.00 AP 00419107 07/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,443.92 12,268.83 27,712.75 *** AP 00419108 07/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 0.00 753.00 753.00 AP 00419109 07/21/2021 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 825.50 0.00 825.50 AP 00419110 07/21/2021 SHRED PROS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00419111 07/21/2021 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 77.07 0.00 77.07 AP 00419112 07/21/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,041.25 0.00 1,041.25 AP 00419117 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,723.06 0.00 8,723.06 AP 00419118 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 0.00 14.66 AP 00419119 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 0.00 14.66 AP 00419120 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.36 0.00 14.36 AP 00419121 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,287.50 0.00 6,287.50 AP 00419122 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 964.84 2,251.31 3,216.15 *** AP 00419123 07/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 1,191.49 1,191.49 AP 00419124 07/21/2021 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 206.17 0.00 206.17 AP 00419125 07/21/2021 STRATEGIC ECONOMICS INC 2,420.00 0.00 2,420.00 AP 00419126 07/21/2021 SUPERION LLC 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00419127 07/21/2021 TEMPLETON,JON 4,917.00 0.00 4,917.00 AP 00419128 07/21/2021 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 2,150.00 0.00 2,150.00 AP 00419129 07/21/2021 TOWILL INC 9,298.95 0.00 9,298.95 AP 00419130 07/21/2021 TRIDEN GROUP CORP 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00419131 07/21/2021 TSI INCORPORATED 0.00 5,600.61 5,600.61 AP 00419132 07/21/2021 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00 AP 00419133 07/21/2021 URBAN3 8,848.00 0.00 8,848.00 AP 00419134 07/21/2021 URIBE,JONATHAN 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00419135 07/21/2021 VERIZON 25.67 0.00 25.67 AP 00419136 07/21/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 481.22 0.00 481.22 AP 00419137 07/21/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0.00 7,117.44 7,117.44 AP 00419138 07/21/2021 VERONICA TAM AND ASSOCIATES 19,482.00 0.00 19,482.00 AP 00419139 07/21/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 256.03 353.27 609.30 *** AP 00419140 07/21/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5,905.16 0.00 5,905.16 AP 00419141 07/21/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 89,714.00 0.00 89,714.00 AP 00419142 07/21/2021 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 0.00 1,443.85 1,443.85 AP 00419143 07/21/2021 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 726.24 0.00 726.24 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ifme: 07:46:35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount Total City: $3,491,399.73 Total Fire: $413,774.42 Grand Total: $3,905,t7M Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Nme: 07:46:35 ti NONRR � a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of$341.04 Dated July 12, 2021 Through July 25, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $14.79 and $326.25 for the City and the Fire District, respectively BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 7/12/2021 through 7/25/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00419029 07/21/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79 326.25 341.04 *** Total City: $14.79 Total Fire: $326.25 Grand Total: $34T.19 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: I Current Date: 07/26/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page flne: 07:51:47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of Cougar Court, Related to Case No. DRC2016-00038 and Previously Subdivided Parcels of Land in the Low(L) District in relation to Parcel Map 16884, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Case No. DRC2016-00039 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Receipt# 308086) and accept Maintenance Cash Bond (Receipt#312225) for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Cash Bond (Receipt#308086)six months after Council approval; 4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Cash Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Case No. DRC2016-00039 was approved by the Planning Department on July 27, 2016 for the site plan and architectural review of three single-family residences on three previously subdivided parcels of land in the Low (L) District on the south side of Cougar Court related to Parcel Map 16884. The parcel map was approved by City Council on December 5, 2007. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to the construction of the public improvements the developer, Jacob Farsakh, submitted Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Receipt # 312225) in the amount of $4,500 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required, and the developer has submitted Maintenance Cash Bond (Receipt#308086) to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. Page 19 FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Page 2 Page 20 Vicinity Map DRC2016-00039 NOT TO SCALE S 'ect Site 1 =�� N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $15,973 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) for the Comar Inc. Power Upgrade Project. (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize an appropriation in the amount of $15,973 for upgrades to Comar Inc's connectivity to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility infrastructure. BACKGROUND: On February 3, 2021, the City Council approved an amendment to Henkels & McCoy, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder, for construction of the Comar Power Upgrade Project, located at 9595 Utica Ave in the amount of$249,611, plus a 5% Contingency. The scope of work for this Project consisted of the removal and upgrade of the existing pad mounted switch and transformer to two (2) new larger size switches and four (4) new transformers and installing new cables, and connections needed to interconnect to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU's) existing infrastructure. All upgrades and improvements were paid for by Comar Inc. ANALYSIS: During construction of the service upgrade, there was an item discovered out in the field that required a change order. In the scope of work, aluminum cable was called out on the plans but it was found that a replacement of copper cable was needed in order to meet the required wire ampacity needed for one of the switchgears. There was a significant cost difference between the aluminum and copper cable in which the additional cost exceeded the original 5% contingency. Staff is requesting an appropriation to fully fund and close out the Project. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of$15,973 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to Account No. 1705303-5650/2054705-0 (Captial Project-Comar Power Upgrade) is needed to fully fund the Project. The cost for the change order has been reimbursed to RCMU by the original electrical contractor for 9595 Utica Ave. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the construction and maintenance of high-quality public improvements that promote a world class community. Page 22 ATTACHMENTS: N/A Page 2 Page 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC (CO18-103) for Fiber Optic Project Management and Design Services for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize Amendment No. 04 for the renewal of Professional Services Agreement (CO18-103) with Magellan Advisors, LLC, in the amount of $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. BACKGROUND: In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Magellan Advisors, LLC entered into a Professional Services Agreement (CO18-103) to provide the necessary design, engineering, permitting and project management for the distribution of the fiber optic network as part of the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan, including the operational parameters to connect the new fiber backbone to the existing infrastructure. ANALYSIS: As the Rancho Fiber network continues to expand, design services and project management is necessary for new development, determining new fiber connections and line extension opportunities for the Fiber Optic Master Plan. Given Magellan Advisor's detailed knowledge of the project and master plan, along with their qualifications and expertise in the field, it is recommended that the City continue utilizing their services to monitor and provide oversight of the fiber design and implementation of a fiber management system to the City's Geographic Information System platform to ensure the project scope is maintained and achieved. A copy of Amendment No. 04 is available in the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) in the amount of $100,000 is included in Account 1711303-5650/1910711-0 (Capital Projects— RC Fiber Optic Network). COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The implementation of the Fiber Optic Master Plan will enhance the City's mission to embrace and anticipate the future of the community through an enhanced 21 st century infrastructure that is critical for economic development for existing and new businesses as well as residential Page 24 customers. ATTACHMENTS: N/A Page 2 Page 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20301 Located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard Related to Case No. SUBTPM20301. (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final map for Parcel Map 20301. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 2021, Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTPM20301 to subdivide an existing 7.97 acre parcel containing two industrial/warehouse buildings into two parcels in the minimum impact/heavy industrial (MI/HI) District, located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard. SUBTPM20301 was approved subject to a condition that Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Reciprocal Easements (CC&Rs) be recorded concurrently with the parcel map. ANALYSIS: The applicant, Diamondback Land Surveying, has submitted a final map for consideration of approval. Staff has determined that the final map is in substantial conformity with the approved tenative map and conditions. Approval of this item by the City Council would approve the Parcel Map 20301 and allow its recordation and recordation of the CC&Rs. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality development that promotes a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 26 Vicinity Map SU BTPM20301 NOT TO SCALE a 0 a Project Site J p 4iWXi�i�1�YVW.uY6� SS}. .� -' N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located at the Southwest Corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue at 9393 Arrow Route per the Improvement Agreement Related to Case No. DRC2018-00139, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of DRC2018-00139 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Receipt#296249)for the associated public improvements; and 3. Release the Labor and Material Cash Bond (Receipt#296249); and 4. Waive the maintenance bond requirement. BACKGROUND: Case No. DRC2018-00139 was approved by the Planning Commission on April 3, 2019 to construct on-site improvements to an existing industrial warehousing facility in the General Industrial (GI) district located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue at 9393 Arrow Route. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on July 17, 2019, to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, RLF II West, LLC., submitted the following securities to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements: Faithful Performance Cash Bond $75,000 Receipt#296249 Labor and Materials Cash Bond $75,000 Receipt#296249 City staff conducted a final inspection of the public improvements in May of 2020 and confirmed all work was completed to City standards. The developer did not provide a maintenance bond to Page 28 the City; therefore, the Faithful Performance Bond was retained for the satisfactory period (one year from the final inspection). City staff has confirmed the improvements have remained in good workmanship and free of defects, City staff recommends the maintenance bond requirement be waived. With completion of the improvements, the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials bonds are no longer required. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 2 Page 29 Vicinity Map DRC2018-00139 NOT TO SCALE �1i6Qu7 i Arrow Rte QGR7C7 a"o=GD Arrow Rte d Project Site z N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2021-00438, Located at 8763 Brilliant Lane. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-87, 2021-88, 2021-89) (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolutions ordering the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2 related to Case No. PMT2021-00438. BACKGROUND: Case No. PMT2021-00438 was submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department on February 16, 2021 for the construction of a 704 square foot addition and 444 square foot existing covered patio conversion located at 8763 Brilliant Lane. The City's municipal code requires the applicant sign Consent and Waiver Forms to annex the subject property to the appropriate Landscape and Street Light Maintenance Districts. ANALYSIS: The owners, Lee Ann Lyon and William H. Nash have submitted the Consent and Waiver to Annexation Forms for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2. Copies of these forms are on file with the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and street light maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: $92.21 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1: $17.77 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2: $39.97 Further, the development will construct no streetlights and no street trees that will need to be maintained by the City. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. Page 31 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution Ordering Annexation - LMD1 Attachment 3 - Resolution Ordering Annexation - SLD1 Attachment 4 - Resolution Ordering Annexation - SLD2 Page 2 Page 32 Vicinity Map P MT2021-00438 NOT TO SCALE r n a� 1 .�G7 G�UTO Wilson Ave N �? __ N 4J o 0 Project Site a c m N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 33 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. PMT2021-00438 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 34 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 35 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LEE ANN LYON & WILLIAM H. NASH The legal description of the Property is: TR 8981 LOT 30 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1062-131-28 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 36 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1(General City) (the "Maintenance District") represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD's within the City. Typically, new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. PMT2021-00438: No street trees Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 37 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) for Case No. PMT2021-00438: EBU* Rate per Land Use Basis Factor EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $92.21 Multi-Family Residential Unit 0.50 92.21 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 92.21 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Parcel x 1 EBU Factor x $92.21 Rate per EBU = $92.21 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page 38 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. PMT2021-00438 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 39 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 40 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LEE ANN LYON & WILLIAM H. NASH The legal description of the Property is: TR 8981 LOT 30 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1062-131-28 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 41 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. PMT2021-00438: No street lights Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 42 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Case No. PMT2021-00438: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Parcel x 1 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $17.77 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page 43 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. PMT2021-00438 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 44 support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 45 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LEE ANN LYON & WILLIAM H. NASH The legal description of the Property is: TR 8981 LOT 30 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1062-131-28 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 46 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in another local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. PMT2021-00438: No street lights Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 47 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) for Case No. PMT2021-00438: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $39.97 Multi-Family Residential Unit 1.00 39.97 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 39.97 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Parcel x 1 EBU Factor x $39.97 Rate per EBU = $39.97 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 20XX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page 48 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of Reimbursement Payment for Underground Utilities Improvements Related to Case No. DRC2006-01012 and Authorization of an Appropriation of$76,880. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve: 1. The payment of reimbursement in the amount of$76,879.34 to Chase Back Bay, LLC for Underground Utilities Improvements related to Case No. DRC2006-01012, located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue; 2. The appropriation of$76,880 from the Underground Utilities Fund (Fund 129) to Account No. 11293035650/1026129-0. BACKGROUND: Case No. DRC2006-01012 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 2008 for the construction of a 28,860 square foot warehouse/office building and associated parking on approximately 1.39 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on November 4, 2015 to ensure construction of the required public improvements including undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue along the project's frontage from the first pole on the south side of 6th Street to the first off-site pole north of the project boundary. On June 16, 2021 City Council accepted the public improvements and authorized release of the securities. City policy and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 16.36.090, require developments with existing overhead utility lines on the opposite side of the street from the project's frontage to pay one-half the in-lieu fee for the future undergrounding of those utility lines. The fee is calculated based on the length of the development's street frontage. In 2007, a warehouse/office project and subdivision (Parcel Map 16139) was completed along the west side of Charles Smith Avenue. This project's developer paid the required in-lieu fee in the amount of$92,214 for undergrounding of the utility lines on the east side of the street as generally shown on Attachment 1. As part of the development of Case No. DRC2006-01012, the developer, Chase Back Bay, LLC, completed a portion of this undergrounding work as described above and is therefore eligible for a proportionate reimbursement from the fees paid in relation to Parcel Map 16139. ANALYSIS: The Chase Back Bay, LLC has requested reimbursement of their refundable portion of the in-lieu Page 49 fee for underground construction. Based on the length of improvements constructed by Chase Back Bay, LLC, staff has calculated a reimbursement amount due of$76,879.34. The remainder of the in-lieu fee, $15,334.66, originally paid by Parcel Map 16139 will be reserved for future undergrounding of the remaining utility lines that will be required when the property to the north of DRC2006-01012 is developed. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation of$76,880 from the Underground Utilities Fund (Fund 129) to Account No. 11293035650/1026129-0 is required for payment of the reimbursement. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 2 Page 50 Vicinity Map D RC2006-01012 NOT TO SCALE �t - "sin Lieu Fee P 16139 Project Ske PM 16139 S aam eo M©o a 4 a i1 N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent SUBJECT: Consideration of the Purchase of Asphalt Materials on an As-Needed Basis from Holliday Rock of Upland, California in an amount Not to Exceed $165,000 for FY 2021/22. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of asphalt materials on an as- needed basis from Holliday Rock of Upland, California in an amount not to exceed $165,000 for FY 2021/22. BACKGROUND: The Public Works asphalt maintenance program consists of routine repairs to extend the City's pavement service life. Asphalt pavement degrades over time and some of the contributing factors to the degradation of the asphalt pavement are heavy traffic volumes, a hot and dry climate that accelerates the oxidation of the asphalt resulting in the pavement becoming prematurely brittle, and water saturation from runoff water. These conditions adversely impact pavement lifespan causing defects in the pavement such as potholes, alligator cracks, longitudinal and transverse cracks, channeling, shoving, and depressions in the pavement. In addition, the City has a memorandum of understanding with the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) whereby the City provides permanent pavement repairs after the water district has completed work on their infrastructure located under the City streets. To maintain the City's roadways and meet the contract service needs provided to CVWD for trench repairs, the City purchases asphalt materials on a regular basis. ANALYSIS: The unique requirements for the placement of asphalt precludes the possibility of purchasing and stockpiling asphalt in advance. Asphalt has a distribution temperature range of 285 to 350 degrees Fahrenheit. The City's equipment is not capable of heating materials to the distribution temperature, it only is capable of maintaining the proper temperature. This requires staff to pick up the hot mix asphalt on the day it will be used to make the necessary repairs. Public Works Services places an average of 1,300 tons of asphalt per year. Staff utilizes the asphalt patch trucks to haul asphalt to paving projects which can be at multiple locations throughout the City. The primary distinction between vendors for the City is the cost to send our asphalt patch truck to the plant and return to the individual job sites. Page 52 On September 2, 2020 the Mayor and Members of the City Council approved a single source procurement of asphalt materials on an as-needed basis from Holliday Rock of Upland, California. Purchasing asphalt from the local vendor, Holliday Rock, results in a reduction of annual transportation costs in the range of$10,000 to $25,000 compared to using other asphalt plants in the Riverside-San Bernardino area. All applicable documentation is on file in the Procurement Division. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of asphalt materials in an amount not to exceed $165,000 annually is within the approved budget for FY 2021/2022 in accounts General Fund 1001318-5200 and CVWD Reimbursements 1006303-5200. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core values of providing and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring well-maintained roadways, addressing sidewalk concerns, and meeting CVWD trench repairs. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 Page 53 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Jeff Benson, Parks and Landscape Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract CO 19-187 with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Citywide Tree Maintenance Services During FY 2021/2022 and Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 3 to contract CO 19-187 with West Coast Arborists, Inc., extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2022 in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for FY 2021-2022. BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2019, the City Council awarded contract CO 19-187 to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for citywide tree maintenance services. These services include grid trimming, pruning, tree removals, stump grinding, planting, staking, pest control, fertilizing, watering, emergency response, and arborist services for City owned and maintained trees. The areas of work include LMDs, CFDs, General Fund, and PD85 parkways, paseos, medians, parks, and City facilities. This contract has an option to renew in one year increments up to a total of seven years ending on June 30, 2027. The original contract proposal was received back in July of 2019, making the current contract rates two years old. If approved, Amendment No. 3 to contract CO 19-187 extends the term of the contract to June 30, 2022 and includes a 3.6% Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) rate increase with no changes to the scope of work, or other terms and conditions. The CPI-U rate is based is based on the March 2021 data for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Region. ANALYSIS: West Coast Arborists, Inc. has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during FY 2021/2022 with a 3.6% (CPI-U) rate increase. West Coast Arborists, Inc. continues to meet the service needs of the City and staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 19-187 effective July 1, 2021 and approve the spending limit of$1,200,000 for FY 2021/2022. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in the approved budget for FY 2021/2022. Page 54 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's Core Values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all while providing a high quality. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-081) (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association salary schedules for fiscal year 2021-2022. BACKGROUND: The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. ANALYSIS: The attached resolution adopts changes approved in the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget. Amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association (RCCEA) salary schedule include: • Addition of Lead Park Ranger classification - the City has an expansive park system with 32+ parks and multiple trails. The addition of Lead Park Ranger will facilitate a higher level of oversight and support for the part-time Park Rangers, as well as the parks and trails. • Addition of Human Resources Business Partner classification -this position is an upgrade to one of the current Human Resources Technician positions and a title change for the current Risk Analyst position. The Human Resources Business Partner will serve as an internal consultant to City departments to enhance service delivery. • Removal of Risk Analyst title — as noted above, this position title has been changed to Human Resources Business Partner to best reflect the current duties of the position. All other salary schedules, classifications, job titles, and other terms of employment remain the same. Staff recommends the City Council approve the resolution updating the RCCEA salary schedule Page 56 for fiscal year 2021-22 to include the aforementioned changes. FISCAL IMPACT: Adjustments to the salary ranges and their fiscal impacts were accounted for in the FY 2021-22 budget. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City's core values of working towards continuous improvement. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 - Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association Salary Schedule Page 2 Page 57 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached amended salary schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (Attachment 2) effective August 4, 2021. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August 2021. Page 58 Resolution No. 2021-XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 4, 2021 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 $3,055 4415 $3,730 4435 $4,121 Account Technician 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Accountant# 3465 $4,786 3505 $5,842 3525 $6,454 Accounts Payable Supervisor# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Administrative Assistant 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Administrative Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Animal Behavior Specialist 4388 $3,259 4428 $3,979 4448 $4,397 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,684 4389 $3,276 4409 $3,619 Animal Care Supervisor# 3440 $4,225 3480 $5,156 3500 $5,698 Animal Caretaker 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Animal Rescue Specialist 4388 $3,259 4428 $3,979 4448 $4,397 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Animal Services Officer 1 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Animal Services Officer II 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Artistic Producer- Mainstreet Theatre 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Assistant Engineer# 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Assistant Planner# 3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Associate Engineer# 3518 $6,233 3558 $7,608 3578 $8,407 Associate Planner# 3487 $5,340 3527 $6,520 3547 $7,203 Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Budget Analyst# 3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Building Inspection Su ervisor#2 3504 $5,812 3544 $7,096 3564 $7,840 Building Inspector 12 4444 $4,308 4484 $5,260 4504 $5,812 Buildinq Inspector 112 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Business License Clerk 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,785 4458 $4,621 4478 $5,106 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 $4,060 3472 $4,954 3492 $5,474 Business License Program Supervisor# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Business License Technician 4408 $3,602 4448 $4,397 4468 $4,858 City Clerk Records Management Analyst# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Community Affairs Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Affairs Officer# 3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Community Affairs Senior Coordinator# 3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Community Affairs Specialist 4350 $2,696 4390 $3,292 4410 $3,637 Community Affairs Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 HI fR A MENT 2 Resolution No. 2021-XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 4, 2021 Minimum Control Point Maximum Community Development Technician 1 4413 $3,691 4453 $4,507 4473 $4,980 Community Development Technician II 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Community Improvement Su ervisor#2 3504 $5,812 3544 $7,096 3564 $7,840 Community Improvement Officer 1 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Community Improvement Officer II 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Community Services Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Services Project Coordinator# 3500 $5,698 3540 $6,956 3560 $7,684 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,696 4390 $3,292 4410 $3,637 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Community Services Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Community Theater Producer 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Customer Care Assistant 4349 $2,684 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Customer Service Representative 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 $4,019 3470 $4,906 3490 $5,421 Engineering Aide 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Engineering Technician 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 $5,783 3543 $7,061 3563 $7,801 Environmental Programs Inspector 2 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Event & Rental Services Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Executive Assistant II# 3444 $4,308 3484 $5,260 3504 $5,812 Executive Assistant' 4394 $3,359 4464 $4,761 4484 $5,260 Fleet Su ervisor#2 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Front of House Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Fund Development Coordinator# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 GIS Analyst# 3505 $5,842 3545 $7,132 3565 $7,878 GIS Specialist 4456 $4,576 4496 $5,585 4516 $6,171 GIS Supervisor# 3535 $6,785 3575 $8,281 3595 $9,150 GIS Technician 4436 $4,140 4476 $5,054 4496 $5,585 Human Resources Business Partner# 3433 $4,079 3473 $4,980 3493 $5,503 Human Resources Clerk 4389 $3,276 4429 $3,999 4449 $4,418 Human Resources Technician 4408 $3,602 4448 $4,397 4468 $4,858 Information Technology Analyst 1# 3505 $5,842 3545 $7,132 3565 $7,878 Information Technology Analyst II# 3520 $6,296 3560 $7,684 3580 $8,489 Information Technology Specialist 1 4456 $4,576 4496 $5,585 4516 $6,171 H I W MENT 2 Resolution No. 2021-XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 4, 2021 Minimum Control Point Maximum Information Technology Specialist II 4471 $4,931 4511 $6,019 4531 $6,650 Information Technology Technician 4411 $3,655 4451 $4,461 4471 $4,931 Lead Park Ranger 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Librarian 1# 3435 $4,121 3475 $5,031 3495 $5,558 Librarian 11# 3457 $4,598 3497 $5,613 3517 $6,203 Library Assistant 1# 3373 $3,023 3413 $3,691 3433 $4,079 Library Assistant 11# 3414 $3,711 3454 $4,530 3474 $5,005 Library Clerk 4356 $2,778 4396 $3,392 4416 $3,747 Library Technician 4393 $3,341 4433 $4,079 4453 $4,507 Maintenance Su ervisor#2 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Management Aide 4440 $4,225 4480 $5,156 4500 $5,698 Management Analyst 1# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Management Analyst 11# 3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 Management Analyst III# 3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Office Services Clerk 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Patron & Events Supervisor# 3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Payroll Supervisor# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,287 4483 $5,235 4503 $5,783 Planning Technician 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Plans Examiner 1 4474 $5,005 4514 $6,110 4534 $6,751 Plans Examiner 11# 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Procurement & Contracts Analyst# 3433 $4,079 3473 $4,980 3493 $5,503 Procurement Clerk 4374 $3,040 4414 $3,711 4434 $4,100 Procurement Technician 4411 $3,655 4451 $4,461 4471 $4,931 Public Services Technician 1 4413 $3,691 4453 $4,507 4473 $4,980 Public Services Technician II 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Public Services Technician 111 4443 $4,287 4483 $5,235 4503 $5,783 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 $4,308 4484 $5,260 4504 $5,812 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Public Works Safety Coordinator#2 3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Records Clerk 4358 $2,806 4398 $3,426 4418 $3,785 Records Coordinator 4386 $3,226 4426 $3,940 4446 $4,352 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3,375 4435 $4,121 4455 $4,552 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,352 4486 $5,314 4506 $5,872 Senior Accountant# 3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 Hl fR LAMENT 2 Resolution No. 2021-XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 4, 2021 Minimum Control Point Maximum Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Senior Building Ins ector#2 3484 $5,260 3524 $6,422 3544 $7,096 Senior Business License Clerk 4398 $3,426 4438 $4,182 4458 $4,621 Senior Community Improvement Officer# 3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Senior Electrician # 3485 $5,288 3525 $6,454 3545 $7,132 Senior GIS Analyst # 3520 $6,296 3560 $7,684 3580 $8,489 Senior Information Technology Analyst# 3535 $6,785 3575 $8,281 3595 $9,150 Senior Information Technology Specialist# 4493 $5,503 4533 $6,718 4553 $7,422 Senior Librarian# 3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Senior Park Planner# 3500 $5,698 3540 $6,956 3560 $7,684 Senior Plans Examiner# 3503 $5,783 3543 $7,061 3563 $7,801 Senior Procurement Technician# 3463 $4,737 3503 $5,783 3523 $6,390 Senior Risk Management Analyst# 3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Senior Veterinary Technician# 3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 Supervisinq Public Works Ins ector#2 3494 $5,529 3534 $6,751 3554 $7,458 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $4,668 4500 $5,698 4520 $6,296 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Theatre Technician III 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Utilities Operation Supervisor# 3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,583 4447 $4,375 4467 $4,833 Veterinary Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 1. When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off 2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class AplaORNMENT 2 NONRR � a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology SUBJECT: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Sidepath, Inc. for data center support services in the total amount not to exceed $200,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve an agreement with Sidepath, Inc. utilizing current NASPO Value Point agreement with Dell Marketing, L.P. to provide professional services and equipment procurement for a one-year term with a not-to-exceed spending limit of$200,000. BACKGROUND: The City Council has authorized multiple projects to replace and upgrade critical information technology infrastructure including the City's data network, data centers, and cybersecurity resources. The City's modern IT infrastructure runs on a combination of different operating systems and services that need to be continually maintained to ensure performance and security. To keep pace with the demands of these duties, DoIT enlists professional service partners who are certified to support the City's Dell/VMWare components and are versed in the configuration and methodologies the City has implemented with the current infrastructure. These partners provide a critical resource to incrementally add services to our data centers as well as providing escalation with exigent patching and updates to address identified vulnerabilities. As part of the fiscal year 2021/22 budget, the Fire District Board and City Council approved a project to expand the storage capability of the City and Fire District data centers. Additionally, the elevated risk from ransomware and cyber-breach is requiring more frequent and complex patching and updating of both data center VXRaiI systems. Sidepath, Inc. was the professional services provider that oversaw the installation and configuration of both data centers and has been a partner in maintaining our VXRail environments since 2018. NASPO ValuePoint agreements are competitively solicited using a Lead State TM model, supported by a Sourcing TeamTM comprised of multiple state procurement representatives and subject matter experts; leveraging the expertise and buying power of the many states and other participating entities. DoIT has utilized NASPO ValuePoint agreements in lieu of conducting a request for proposals for previous engagements with these and other information technology vendors to provide discounted services and equipment. ANALYSIS: Page 63 Sidepath provided a quote of$105,408 to provide equipment, installation, and configuration of expanded storage for both the City and Fire District data centers and a quote of$80,000 to complete quarterly patching for both data centers for a 1-year period. Staff recommends an authorized contingency of$14,592, for a total not-to-exceed allowance of$200,000 with Sidepath, Inc. under the one-year agreement. Sidepath, Inc. was the City's primary partner setting up the current Dell/VMWare VXRail hyperconverged data centers as well as the new F5 Network Security Appliance. They are a participating provider under the California Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-34-003 to the Dell NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement No. MNWNC-108. All agreements are on-file with the City Clerk's Office and supporting documentation is on-file with DoIT. FISCAL IMPACT: The expanded storage project is funded for a total of $105,408 out of Fire District Account No. 3288501-5605 (Fire District Capital Fund) in the amount of$50,000, DoIT Account No. 1714001- 5605 (Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund) in the amount of$50,000, and DoIT Account No. 1001209-5300 (DoIT Contract Services Fund) in the amount of$5,408. The quarterly patching project in the amount of$80,000 and the contingency for both projects in the amount of $14,592 are both funded under DoIT Account No. 1001209-5300 (DoIT Contract Services Fund) as part of Network Support Services. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Authorizing a pre-set spending allowance with multiple providers under the NASPO ValuePoint agreements directly supports Council's Core Values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and continuous improvement. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 Page 64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: Consideration to Award Contract to Golden State Construction for the Civic Center COVID and ADA Improvement Project. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications, accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $753,620 (Base Bid plus Additive Bids) for the "Civic Center COVID and ADA Improvement Project" to the lowest responsive bidder, Golden Gate Construction of Norwalk, and authorize a 20% contingency in the amount of$150,730. BACKGROUND: Over the past eighteen months the City has worked to provide an environment as safe as possible from the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. For some work areas this was only able to be accommodated by sending employees home to work; however, the nature of much of the work performed at City Hall requires the space for safe, collaborative work. This project has been designed to migitate the impacts of COVID-19 by taking actions to control its spread. Specifically, these improvements will help stop COVID-19 from spreading at City Hall by increasing the physical distance of employees in dense workspaces. Currently, the workspace conditions in this project are not conducive to creating an environment that minimizes the spread of COVID-19 as the preexisting physical layouts require concentrated areas for employees to work. For example, in one of the offices being modified, three staff occupy an office meant to accommodate one employee; this project will eliminate the enclosed, unsafe work areas and increase the physical distance between these employees. In another workspace, employees reside in cubicles with minimal barrier separation. This project will create more space and separation for the employees. In a third area, an employee breakroom will be expanded to allow for more appropriate distancing for when the space is occupied by two or more people. Furthermore, new furniture surfaces are designed to be easy to clean and disinfect and will enhance cleaning efforts for the City's enhanced cleaning/disinfection regimen. While this work is being done, the City will be increasing accessibility in the impacted workspaces including redesigning bathrooms as well as increasing the width of doors and pathways per the City's American with Disability Act Transition Plan in order to be in compliance with the current standards set forth in the ADA. Page 65 ANALYSIS: Five (5) bids for this project opened at 2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 20, 2021 (see attached Bid Summary). The proposal submitted by the initial lowest bidder, PUB Construction, Inc., was deemed to be non-compliant. The next lowest responsive bidder, Golden Gate Construction, has met the requirements of the bid documents, and staff has completed the required background investigation. A copy of the contract is on file with the City Clerk's Office. The project is scheduled to be completed within one hundred (100) working days. FISCAL IMPACT: The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) is providing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to cities that may be used for specific eligible uses. Based on the scope of work, these improvements are eligible for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds awarded with the American Rescue Plan Act. Per the Interim Final Rule, COVID-19 Mitigation and Prevention measures include efforts to contain COVID-19, such as capital improvements in public facilities to implement COVID-19 mitigation tactics, which include physical changes to facilities to improve physical distancing which mitigates and prevents the COVID-19 spread. The City Council has already appropriated the capital project for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 for $1,302,400 in the Capital Reserve Fund — Capital Outlay — Building & Improvement account 1025001-5602. Staff recommends the appropriations be revised due to identifying specific elements for mitigation and prevention expenditures eligible for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery. Note that elements that are not related to mitigation and prevention measures are excluded from the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funding. Capital Reserve Fund — Federal Grants Fund — Capital Outlay— Building Capital Outlay— Building & & Improvement Improvement 1025001-5602 1275208-5602 / 2085275-0 Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2021/22 $1,302,400 Increase/(Reduce) appropriation for Mitigation and Prevention efforts ($1,259,600) $1,259,600 Revised Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2021/22 $42,800 $1,259,600 This appropriation includes a contingency of$150,724.00 in the event of unexpected discoveries during construction. It should be noted that the building is 30 years old and has been through multiple undocumented alterations over the years. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project addresses the City Council Core Values of Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all and Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. ATTACHMENT: Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Page 2 Page 66 Evaluation Only.Created with Aspose.Cells for.NET.Copyright 2003-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd. **Lowest Responsive 5 ID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING: July 20 2021 Bidder** 2 3 4 -Non-Compliant- Civic Center ADA and Covid Improvement Golden Gate Monet Construction, Dalke and Sons R Dependable PUB Construction, Inc. Project Construction Inc. Construction, Inc. Construction, Inc. BASE BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO QTY JUNITIDESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT City Manager's Office Improvements per the "A-", I'M_% 11P_" "Ell, "F_" sheets of the Project Plans. See section 6-7.2 Working Day (Sheets GP-9 $573,000.00$573,000.00$707,346.78$707,346.78$715,300.00$715,300.00$597,566.31 $597,566.31 $496,500.00$496,500.00 and GP-10) of the Special Provisions for working days and hours for LS Idemolition work for Community Services Breakroom Improvements per $80,400.00 $80,400.00 $94,682.50 $94,682.50 $74,715.00 $74,715.00$153,348.72$153,348.72 $91,000.00 $91,000.00 sheets AB-1.0 and AB-1.1 2 1 LS finance Department Mice Improvements per sheets AF- 1.0 and AF-2.0 of Project $80,200.00 $80,200.00 $46,662.00 $46,662.00 $71,960.00 $71,960.00$110,000.00$110,000.00 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 3 1 LS Plans. airway 171 ana Stair To Lobby Improvements per Sheet A-5.1 of Project $20,020.00 $20,020.00 $26,290.00 $26,290.00 $24,800.00 $24,800.00 $35,084.96 $35,084.96 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 4 1 LS Plans. BID: $753,620.00 BfD: $874,981.281 BID: $886,775.001 B1D: $896,000.00 BID: $679,500.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT: CORRECTED $753,620.00 CORRECTED $874,981.28 CORRECTED $886,775.00 CORRECTED $895,999.99 CORRECTED $679,500.00 **Non-compliant because the bid did not include costs for fire protection.** ATTACMENT 1 Page 67 I Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Cells for .NET.Copyright 2003-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd. Name Amount 1 PUB Construction $679,500. 00 2 Golden Gate Constructior $753,620. 00 3 Monet Construction $874,981. 28 4 Dalke and Son Constr. $886,775. 00 5 R Dependable Const. $896,000. 00 6 7 8 9 10 11 Page 68 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve and Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District for Property Commonly Known as APN 0208-151-24 Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Road, and Appropriate American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds for the Purchase as Indicated in the Staff Report. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement for the purchase of the property commonly known as APN 0208-151-24, generally located at the southwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Road (Subject Property), authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute and modify documents necessary for the purchase of the Subject Property, and appropriate American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)funds for the purchase as indicated in the staff report. BACKGROUND: Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) has owned the Subject Property at 9591 San Bernardino Road since 1988. The 1.13 acre site (49,223 square feet) consists of vacant land and the vacant Chinatown House, a structure that was designated as a historical landmark by the City in 1995. Over the years, various uses were considered for the site by CVWD, but none came to fruition. Most recently, CVWD determined that the property is no longer needed to serve the needs of the District and declared the parcel to be surplus. The Chinatown House has been fenced for public safety purposes for approximately ten (10) years and is in an extreme state of deterioration at this time. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District owns two adjacent parcels to the west on San Bernardino Road. Originally purchased as possible replacement sites for the aging San Bernardino Road Fire Station, a more appropriate site was subsequently identified and developed into the West Side Public Safety Facility at the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue. With these two vacant parcels no longer necessary for District use, the District declared them to be surplus in the Spring of 2021. ANALYSIS: City staff has entered into discussions with Cucamonga Valley Water District for the purchase of this property. It is envisioned that, together with the two other vacant parcels owned by the Fire District, the parcels can be assembled into a single site that will provide a new opportunity for the Page 69 development of high-quality affordable housing. The City is home to several such projects, all of which meet the needs of low, very low, and/or moderate income residents while providing excellence in architecture and services that support the resident individuals and families. If the City Council approves the purchase of the property, work can begin to develop the specifics of an affordable housing project that is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. This will include an evaluation of options with regard to the Chinatown House, working with all stakeholders to develop possible options, and next steps. A purchase price of$560,000 has been negotiated for the parcel, based on CVWD's appraisal of the property. Staff recommends the City Council authorize the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with CVWD for this parcel and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute and modify documents necessary for the purchase of the Subject Property. A copy of the draft Purchase and Sale Agreement is on file in the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) is providing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to cities that may be used for very specific allowable purposes. Per the Interim Final Rule, under the Building Strong Communities through Investments in Housing and Neighborhoods, eligible uses include providing services that alleviate the economic impacts of the COVID-19 on housing insecurity. Affordable housing developments support economic stabilization and address the systemic economic challenges that have contributed to the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on economically disadvantaged households. Many studies have documented the disproportionate impacts of the COVID-19 virus on the health and economic outcomes in low-income communities; this fact is stated in the Department of Treasury's Final Interim Rule of July 19, 2021 regarding the appropriate uses of ARPA funds. Treasury further states that the development of affordable housing is an eligible use of ARPA funds, as it seeks to provide services to those populations that are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. According to data published by the County of San Bernardino, racial and ethnic inequities in COVID-19 case rates have been pervasive, with communities of color experiencing exponentially higher case rates. According to the May-August 2020 California Health Interview Survey, approximately 7% of all County households were behind on rent as of mid-December 2020; Latino, Black, and Asian households were nearly three times as likely as White households to be behind on rent. Meanwhile, as many have struggled to pay for housing, the median price of homes for sale continued to grow through 2020, increasing 16% in the County. The majority of jobs lost during the pandemic were in industries that pay low average wages, with the lowest-paying industries accounting for 30% of all jobs, but 53% of the jobs lost from February 2020 to June 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Given these disproportionate impacts on economically disadvantaged residents, there is a significant need to build stronger neighborhoods and communities that include additional affordable housing options that serve low-income residents. It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the use of ARPA funds in the amount of $660,000, which will provide funds for the purchase price of$560,000, plus an additional $100,000 in estimated costs related to the transaction, including environmental analysis of the site. The following appropriation is submitted for the City Council's approval: Federal Grants Fund, Capital Outlay-Land (1275208-5600/2085275-0) for$660,000 Page 2 Page 70 The City of Rancho Cucamonga received the first tranche for approximately $13 million of ARPA funds in May 2021. The second tranche for approximately $13 million will be received in May 2022. The majority of these funds will be used to to replace revenues lost as a result of the pandemic. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Purchase of this parcel for affordable housing purposes is in keeping with the Council's core value of seeking equitable prosperity for all. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 3 Page 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions Denying Minor Design Review DRC2020- 00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, and a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-082, 2021-083, 2021-084) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt resolutions denying Minor Design Review DRC2020- 00138 and conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. BACKGROUND: On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 by a vote of 3 in favor and 2 against. On May 19, 2021, the City Council appealed the Planning Commissions decision by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against, and on July 7, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the subject application which proposed the construction of a 14-pump service station and convenience store on certain property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue, at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. After taking testimony from staff, the applicant, and members of the public, the Council deliberated on the item and voted with 4 in favor and 1 against to deny Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, but to approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. At that meeting, the City Council directed staff to return at a later date with Resolutions as appropriate. For a full discussion on the history of this project, please reference the July 7 staff report and related attachments, which have been included with this report as Attachment 1. ANALYSIS: At the July 7, 2021 meeting, after having received the staff report, testimony from the applicant's representative, and public testimony, the majority of Council members expressed a variety of concerns with the project. Specifically, these concerns, many of which were also expressed by the members of the public in attendance, included: the appropriateness of the project at the proposed location, the proximity of the project to nearby schools and residential neighborhoods, the potential for increases in crime which may be associated with such uses, concerns of equity and overconcentration of service stations and convenience stores located in Southwest Rancho Cucamonga and a strong desire from Council members and members of the public to see the subject site developed with a "value-added" resource or use which is more appropriate for the surrounding neighborhood and which better reflects the City's status as an All-America City and Page 72 which better aligns with Healthy RC goals and objectives. While the Council ultimately decided to deny Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, the Council also voted to approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 which permits the subdivision of the existing parcel into two new parcels. Parcel 1, upon which the service station and convenience store was proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9th Street). Parcel 2, upon which an existing multi-tenant commercial building will remain, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Notably, upon the denial of Minor Design Review DRC2020- 00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, Parcel 1 will remain vacant until such time that the property owner proposes a project which receives all necessary approvals from the City. Thus, no construction activity or physical changes to the property are proposed as part of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no associated fiscal impact related to the subdivision of the subject parcel into two new parcels. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While there are no Council goals which are directly achieved with the subdivision of the parcel into two lots, the denial of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 intends to maintain a high quality of life for Rancho Cucamonga residents, particularly those residents who live near the subject site, as well as students who attend nearby schools. Denying the service station and convenience store project also intentionally embraces and anticipates the future and encourages equitable prosperity for all. Acknowledging a disproportionate number of service stations and convenience stores which already exist within Southwest rancho Cucamonga when compared to elsewhere in the City, numerous residents, as well as certain Council members, at the July 7, 2021 public hearing for this item expressed a strong desire for this property to develop with a more appropriate use which would more directly benefit the residents of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —July 7 Staff Report and Related Attachments Attachment 2 — Resolution of Denial Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 Attachment 3— Resolution of Denial_Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 Attachment 4 — Resolution of Approval—Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Attachment 5—Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Attachment 6—Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Conditions of Approval Page 2 Page 73 A h 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Approve SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020- 00087 — Orbis Real Estate Partners, This Project Consists of a Request to Develop a New Commercial Building with a Service Station and Convenience Store Within the General Industrial (GI) District at the Southwest Corner of Archibald Avenue and 91h Street on Property Addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0209-032-35. The Planning Commission's Approval of the Project Qualified as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. If the City Council Denies the Project, the Project is Exempt under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve SUBTPM20164, DRC2020-00138 and DRC2020-00087, receive oral testimony, and continue the public hearing to its next meeting in order to provide the applicant with an opportunity to respond to the new evidence provided in this report. BACKGROUND: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial (GI). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi- tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping). This existing building is proposed to remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco Company) which proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41 — On-sale Beer and Wine— Eating Places License). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The driveway entrance and parking lot of the existing multi-tenant commercial building at the southern portion of the property is proposed to be reconfigured because of this project. PlgggE67® On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the application, which in addition to the entitlements listed in the title above, also included a request for a conditional use permit to allow off-sale alcohol related to the convenience store (Type 20— Beer and Wine), and a corresponding request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) as the census tract within which the property is located is overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses. At that meeting, the Commission voted to deny the CUP for off-sale alcohol sales, citing the existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses within the census tract as well as the proximity of the project to nearby schools as justification. Staff notes that these concerns were also shared by members of the public. At the same meeting, the Commission identified several other concerns with the project, some of which were again shared by members of the public. These concerns included: • Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see the proposed use expand fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents; • Signage and Exterior Illumination: commissioners expressed concern that exterior illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the street; • Equity: several commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the Southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a convenience store and restaurant would further burden the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood when a grocery store is needed to ameliorate the food desert in the area.; • Concentration of Service Stations: commissioners also noted a perceived concern related to the number of service stations located within proximity to the proposed project. In response to the Commission's stated concerns, the applicant revised the project to incorporate the following changes: 1. To improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales were replaced with fresh food areas; 2. To address concerns from the commission regarding exterior lighting and signage, lighting and signage was now proposed to be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald frontage shall be either externally illuminated or "halo" lit, to minimize any impacts and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be illuminated; 3. In response to the commission's concerns regarding this project being a high-quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant also revised the project to include: a. Electric Vehicle charging stations — the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each; b. If the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline; c. The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and install appropriate drought tolerant landscaping. Page 2 P�ggt#i�� 4. Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the sale of tobacco, the applicant agreed to not advertise any tobacco or tobacco related products along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco related products will be located behind the cashier's counter within the store, so as not to be easily accessible by minors. The Planning Commission reviewed this item with the proposed changes listed above on May 12, 2021. From the outset, the Planning Commission was divided in their reasoning and unclear in their discussion about impacts, or lack thereof; multiple questions were raised by Commissioners which were not able to be addressed either due to time or lack of notice. Among the discussion points and concerns discussed at the May 12 meeting, questions were raised by commissioners about the health impacts of the project, including how it was designed, will operate and whether the applicant was truly selling fresh foods, if so to what degree, and would that continue permanently or be phased out. Further, as was noted in the discussion, this project has the potential for significant and material effects on the quality of life within the City and adjacent area that the Council may wish to review and discuss. The Planning Commission voted to approve the project by a vote of 3 in favor, and 2 against without any additional conditions beyond those proposed by staff. On May 19, 2021, the City Council appealed the project for further consideration by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against. ANALYSIS: Healthy Development Checklist/Healthy Food Retailer: Specifically, discussion at the May 12, 2021 meeting ensued as to whether or not the project meets the intent of the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist ("Checklist"), published by the Riverside University Health System, "...was developed to provide criteria for healthy development practices in the Inland Empire. It is intended to be used as a tool to judge the overall health performance and supportiveness of new development projects. While not every criterion will apply to every development project, projects should aim to comply with as many of the criteria as possible to promote health through their development project." The Checklist focuses on six "topic areas," which include: 1) Active Design; 2) Connectivity; 3) Public Safety;4) Environmental Health; 5)Community Cohesion; and 6)Access to Food, Services and Jobs. The Checklist further provides 30 focus items which include criteria by which projects are intended to meet in order to comply with the checklist. In response to the Commission's inquiries from May 12, staff has analyzed the project's compliance with the Checklist. Notably, the majority of focus items contained within the Checklist are not applicable to this specific project, as they apply to other types and scales of development projects. However, staff has listed below certain areas of concern within the Healthy Development Checklist which closely reflect certain concerns expressed throughout the development review process, and in particular those concerns raised by certain Commissioners at the May 12 Planning Commission meeting. • Pedestrian Environment (Active Design): The Checklist notes that "walking is positively corelated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Perceptions matter: the extent to which a neighborhood is perceived as walkable is correlated with residents' likelihood of participating in regular physical activity. A quality pedestrian environment also creates a physical Page 3 P�ggt#i�® and psychological buffer between pedestrians, bikes and cars..." The Checklist proceeds to provide certain criteria to be included in a project in order to fulfill its intent. Criteria includes, in part, pedestrian signals, in-pavement flashing lights, legible signage and wayfinding information, street trees planted between the vehicle and travel way at intervals no more than 50 feet, etc. The proposed project meets minimum City standards by constructing a new sidewalk, curb and gutter at 9th Street along the frontage of the project, as well as new landscaped parkways with new street trees along both frontages of the project. In addition, the project proposes new pathways connecting the pedestrian realm with the interior of the site and the proposed building. However, the project proposes a vehicle-oriented use (service station) adjacent to a residential neighborhood and within proximity to schools. The public improvements offered as part of the project are minimum City standards and do not specifically improve the Pedestrian Environment as called for by the Healthy Development Checklist. Further, introducing such a vehicle-oriented use as a service station across the street from residential uses and within proximity to schools, especially without the inclusion of pedestrian-oriented design features, does not improve the walkability of the area. Rather, such a use would induce additional vehicular traffic which could result in negative impacts to the pedestrian environment. • Frontage Design (Active Design): This item on the Checklist provides criteria which encourages buildings to have primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street or public open spaces. Criteria for this item also encourages appropriately scaled buildings, and parking lots which are located away from streets. As with the Pedestrian Environment parameter described above, the purpose of this parameter is to improve neighborhood safety, physical activity opportunities, and aesthetics. Easy to access buildings make it easier to get around by walking and biking and buildings oriented towards the street help implement CEPTED neighborhood safety best practices by providing "eyes on the street" through open spaces and fields of vision from within the building. While the project provides an appropriately-scaled building with the primary parking field located opposite the building from Archibald Avenue, the building provides no primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street. The project does provide one entrance on the north side of the building, but this entrance is oriented towards and provides access to the restaurant's outdoor patio. Staff notes that a primary entrance facing Archibald Avenue had been requested by staff throughout the development review process, but that the applicant neglected to include this element of design as they cited loss-prevention concerns for 7-Eleven. Further, while the project proposes a large landscaped setback and a private patio for use by patrons of the restaurant, the project provides no usable public open spaces. Thus, the project does not meet the intent of the Checklist with regard to Frontage Design. • Environmental Justice (Environmental Health): Throughout the development review process, both members of the public as well as certain Commissioners have questioned whether or not the proposed use is the most appropriate use for this location, considering the site's proximity to existing residential across Archibald Avenue, as well as the project's proximity to two schools, Cucamonga Page 4 Elementary and Rancho Cucamonga Middle School. In particular, some concerns involved the proximity of a service station being located so close to an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School). More generally, the project is located within Southwest Cucamonga, an area of the City which has been identified as a disadvantaged community according to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Data collected from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey illustrates these inequities historically observed between Southwest Cucamonga and the rest of the City. For example, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, falls well below the City's average Median household income ($92,773 Citywide; $74,592 for Census Tract 21.05). Poverty rates are also much higher (7.5% Citywide; 14.1% for Census Tract 21.05), with Citywide poverty rates for children and seniors even further exacerbated (6% and 8%, respectively, Citywide; 14% and 19%, respectively, within the census tract). The Checklist states that "...the negative impacts of the built environment disproportionately impact disadvantaged communities, including higher instances of respiratory disease, cancer, obesity, and developmental diseases. Community design, together with planning decisions, can play a key role in making these communities healthier and mitigating the impacts of existing land use patterns and transportation investments in the region." The Checklist goes on to provide criteria which encourages that projects "minimize exposure to hazardous contaminants, including contaminated soils, pesticides, contaminated groundwater, and emissions by not siting residential development near or in the path of exposure sites..." Further, the Checklist provides criteria which encourages projects to "minimize development of sensitive land uses — defined as schools, hospitals, residences, and elder and childcare facilities— near air pollution sources..." The applicant proposes to locate a 14-pump service station with a convenience store within an identified disadvantaged community, and within close proximity to an elementary school and a residential neighborhood. Considering the site context of the project, in particular the status of the census tract as a disadvantaged community, staff feels that the concerns shared by members of the community and Commissioners over the appropriateness of the location of the project have been corroborated. Staff notes that the applicant has submitted an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, Revised 2021)which states that the project will not result in any significant impacts to air quality or greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). However, staff notes that the Healthy Development Checklist discourages the siting of"exposure sites" within proximity to residential development in order to minimize soils and ground water contaminations. In this case, the applicant proposes to site a 14-pump service station within proximity to residential uses and schools. Despite the applicant's analysis which states that there would be no significant impact to air quality or greenhouse gas emissions, dedicating the site to a service station in the long term may result in the potential of soils contamination which may also adversely impact the potential for the site to redevelop in the future into a use which might be more appropriate to the surrounding neighborhood. Generally, staff has Page 5 observed that the redevelopment of sites previously utilized as service stations is very costly and difficult for developers to achieve often due to the need to remediate soils contamination. In short, encumbering the site in the long term may result in the property becoming a "brownfield site" which will be costly and difficult to redevelop in the future to a more appropriate use. Furthermore, while the Air Quality Study did not conclude a significant impact, the CEQA Thresholds do not address the inequitable challenges faced by residents in disadvantaged communities, especially those, such as Southwest Cucamonga, that are already shouldering a heavier air pollution burden. Current CEQA tools do not provide a framework for addressing potential inequities of air pollution. However, adding an automobile-oriented use, such as a gas station, in an area of the city where the community has expressed concerns about exacerbating environmental impacts is an environmental justice issue. • Grocery (Access to Food, Jobs, and Services): At the May 12 meeting, certain Commissioners questioned the applicant's stated objective that the use would function similar to a small grocery store for the benefit of the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner's questioned the quality of retail items, what percentage of the items would consist of pre-packaged food, and how the "lab store" concept would differ, or not, from a standard convenience store. Regarding groceries, the Checklist provides the following criteria that a grocery/produce type of project would be expected to incorporate in order to achieve compliance: 1) A neighborhood market within the project design, or; 2) a public, multi-use space that allows for food markets, or; 3)access to a "full-service" grocery store within reasonable walking distance. The Checklist provides that a full-service grocery store would include meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables. As previously noted, the proposed project has been described to staff as being a new"lab store"concept, which is a re-branding of the traditional convenience store model. This lab store concept provides offerings such as made-to-order coffee drinks, cold-pressed juices, smoothies and agua frescas. Also available are novelty beverages on tap such as nitro cold brew, kombucha and organic tees. The concept also includes a "cold treats bar" with frozen yogurt and ice cream, as well as cookies and baked goods which are baked in-store daily. In comparing the offerings of the lab store concept with the Checklist's criteria, while the project incorporates a market into the design, it does not meet the criteria for a full-service grocery store. For example, the lab store concept appears to omit any substantial offerings of meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables. Nor does the project incorporate a public, multi-use space that allows for food markets. Further, to date, staff remains unclear as to what extent pre-packaged food constitutes the percentage of retail items for sale as part of the lab store concept. Finally, in working with other grocers since the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission hearing, Staff has learned that full-service grocery stores typically have a minimum size of 20,000 square feet, which is substantially greater than proposed for this convenience store. Over the last several weeks, staff has worked to better understand the fresh food offerings at other 7-Eleven Lab Stores and have found a very small portion of the store devoted to fresh and healthy food. Page 6 PIRgg(i79 • Healthy Food (Access to Food, Jobs, and Services): Similar to the "Grocery" section above, the Checklist also considers how well a project maintains a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers. As a disadvantaged community where statistics show that families have a lower median income and where poverty rates are higher than elsewhere in the City, Southwest Cucamonga lacks certain community serving uses, such as grocery stores. According to the California Department of Public Health, "Lower income families are less likely to have a nutritious diet than those with higher incomes. People's food choices and their likelihood of being overweight or obese are...influenced by their food environment. A popular measure of healthy and less healthy food availability in a given geographic area-including distance to food retailers, cost of foods, or density of good outlets— is the modified Retail Environment Food Index (mREFI), which is a ratio of fast—food restaurants and convenience stores compared to supermarkets, produce markets, and farmer's markets. Presence of fast food retailers has a negative effect on diets and diet related health outcomes." In short, ease of access to food influences people's eating choices. If healthy food is unavailable or harder to access, people will tend to choose unhealthy food. Accordingly, the Checklist establishes criteria to achieve compliance with Healthy Food objectives. This criteria includes restricting fast food retailers within '/2 mile of schools, and managing the allowance of fast food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy foods retailers to unhealthy food retailers. According to the City's business license data, there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 and within '/2 mile of the tract boundary. Of these, only 3 are considered "healthy" retailers, which include supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets, and warehouse clubs. Less healthy food retailers included fast food, restaurants, convenience stores, and small grocery stores. The Healthy Development Checklist identifies four scores. Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have "poor access" to healthy retail food, scores between 5 and 10 are considered to have "fair access," scores above 10 to 25 are considered to have "good access," and scores above 25 are considered to have "high access." This Census Tract's mREFI score is 5.6. Permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store would not comply with "Healthy Food" on the Checklist as it would: 1) locate a fast food retailer within '/2 mile of schools; and 2) it would further exacerbate that disparity of healthy and unhealthy retailers within Census Tract 21.05. Additional Concerns: Throughout the development review process, several concerns had been raised by members of the public, staff and Planning Commissioners. In fact, staff originally recommended denial of the whole project at the February 24, 2021 meeting, but the Planning Commission only denied the portion of the Conditional Use Permit relative to off-sale alcohol sales at that time. Based on the May 12 discussion with the Planning Commission, and despite the Commission's approval of the project, remaining issues continue to include: 1) perceived concentration of service stations and convenience stores; 2) hours of operation and concerns of increases in crime; 3) and the general appropriateness of the project at this location and the desirability of new and expansion of existing service stations as a land use in the City_ The City Council may wish Page 7 P�gg�i88 to consider these issues as part of this appeal. Perceived Concentration of Service Stations and Convenience Stores: During two neighborhood meetings held for the project in November 2020 and January 2021, as well as the public hearing held on February 24, 2021, members of the public expressed concerns that there already exist a high number of service stations within the vicinity of the project site. Staff acknowledges that there is no "concentration ordinance" which prohibits the number of services stations, however four service stations presently exist within one mile of the project site (Valero Station, 8514 Vineyard, 76 Station at 10075 Arrow Route, Kwik Sery at 9524 Foothill Boulevard, and Shell Gas at 7996 Archibald Avenue) and a fifth service station about '/4 of a mile to the north of the project site at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue was approved as part of DRC2015- 00682 in July 2018 to redevelop an existing abandoned service station. Notably, the proposed service station at Archibald Avenue and 9th Street would also be the largest service station within the vicinity as it would offer 14 pumps. The other stations listed above provide anywhere between 4 pumps (Arrow and Archibald location)to 12 pumps (Valero and 76). Attachment 3 provides the location of service stations within the project vicinity. Staff notes for the Council's consideration that each of these service stations include off-sale alcohol. Hours of Operation and Concerns of Increases in Crime: At the November 2020 and January 2021 neighborhood meetings, as well as at the February 24 public hearing on this item, multiple residents raised concerns regarding potential impacts associated with the proposed hours of operation, including an increase in crime and noise. Staff notes that the proposed convenience store and service station will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the Laredo Taco Company proposing hours of 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM, 7 days a week. Based on staff's preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service at service stations in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service at service stations in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but as of June 2021 there have been 135 calls for service, which includes two homicides at service stations with convenience stores. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service per year. When analyzing existing 7-Eleven's throughout the City, staff discovered that there have been over 600 calls for service, with more than 100 police reports prepared within the past two and a half years. The chart below highlights calls for service by existing 7-Eleven location. Location Calls for Service Number of Reports 10477 Alta Loma Drive 69 13 7900 Haven Avenue 229 34 8118 Masi Drive 56 14 9464 Base Line Road 36 3 9638 Milliken Avenue 219 44 Notably, of the five existing 7-Eleven's, only the 7-Eleven on Alta Loma Drive contains a service station. As such, it is reasonable to assume that the proposed project would result in criminal activity most similar to this location; however, it should be noted that Staff is not sure why the Haven and Milliken locations have such high calls for service. We are unable at this time to say definitively that the Archibald and 9th Street location might not have similar concerns. In analyzing this data, it is clear that calls for service corroborate the residents' perception of crime potentially Page 8 P�ggt#i8;f increasing as it relates to this type of use. Service Station Moratorium: As previously noted, there is no "concentration ordinance" within the Development Code which prohibits the number of service stations within the City. However, 32 service stations currently exist within the City and the Planning Department has recently received several inquiries regarding new service stations and the expansion of existing service stations. The frequency of these inquiries has raised the need to analyze such land uses and their benefits to the community, or lack thereof. Consequently, on April 21, 2021, the City Council adopted an Urgency Moratorium, along with an extension on June 2, 2021, to provide adequate time for staff to analyze impacts related to the construction of new service stations and expansion of existing service stations. Topics of concern which staff is researching with regard to the service station moratorium include: • The number and location of existing service stations in the City; • Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community; • Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses; • Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential neighborhoods; • Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public safety services; • Land use policies that will be included in the "PlanRC" General Plan update; • Possible performance stations andVor conditions that could be placed on service station projects in the future. As of the writing of this report, the moratorium on service stations expires on April 20, 2022. Staff continues to investigate the various concerns listed above related to the moratorium. Notably, while the subject service station was exempted from this moratorium provided that the developer obtain entitlements and building permits by October 21, 2021, a number of the concerns with regard to the moratorium also exist with the proposed service station project as have been discussed in this report. Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087: Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations which can include convenience stores. Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164: The project includes a proposal to subdivide the existing subject parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9th Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Conclusion: For the reasons and evidence stated in this report, staff recommends that the City Page 9 P�gg�i8� Council overturn the Commission's approval and deny the Minor Design Review and Conditional Use Permit related to the application, while recommending that the City Council uphold Planning Commission's decision to approve the Tentative Parcel Map. Staff acknowledges that this is contrary to staff's recommendation to approve the project which was provided to the Planning Commission on May 12, but staff has conducted a more exhaustive analysis of this project in light of comments received at the Planning Commission meeting and has identified additional evidence pertinent to the project as a result of that analysis, particularly relating to crime statistics, gas station concentrations, and consistency with the HealthyRC policies. Given that this recommendation is partially based on new evidence, staff recommends that if the applicant desires additional time to respond, the City Council consider a continuance of the public hearing to its next meeting or the first meeting in August before voting and rendering a final decision on the appeal. If the applicant does not desire additional time to respond, then the Council should direct staff to prepare resolutions to memorialize its findings and decision for consideration at the July 21st Council meeting. For the Council's consideration, please note that staff has determined to change internal project review processes as a result of this experience so that these various topic areas are analyzed and considered as early in the development process as practical so that changes in recommendations such as is the case with this project will not happen in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has provided a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) (The Natelson Dale Group, Inc.), which states that the proposed project would generate $113,814 in annual revenue to the general fund. Staff reviewed the applicant's FIA and compared it to tax data compiled for the other existing 7- Eleven locations within the City. According to Fiscal Year 2019-2020 data, existing 7-Eleven locations generate sales tax ranging between $10,000 to $40,000, annually, which is approximately$70,000 to$110,000 lower than the figures provided in the applicant's FIA. Further, it is also reasonable to assume that as the proposed project no longer includes alcohol sales, that sales tax generated by the project would be even lower than indicated in the FIA. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: For reasons discussed in this report, particularly as it relates to the project's potential to exacerbate an existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses, staff notes that the project will not achieve the City Council's Core Value to "promote and enhance a safe and healthy community." ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Applicant's Correspondence Dated May 19, 2021 Attachment 2 - May 12 and February 24 Planning Commission Item Packets Attachment 3— Census Tract 21.05 Vicinity Map Attachment 4 — Healthy Development Checklist Page 10 P�ggt#i89 From: Jonathan Shardlow To: City Council;City Clerk;McPherson,Sean Subject: Comments on City Council Agenda Item H1-Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning Commission in Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164,Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138,and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. Date: Wednesday,May 19,2021 11:52:24 AM Attachments: RC Healthy Checklist Matrix.pdf 7-Eleven Lab Concept-Grocery-Restau rant.pdf 7-Eleven Presentation by 7-Eleven(Final).pptx IWARNINGLThe sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the person in the "From" field.11 o not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers and Planner Sean McPherson, Please accept these comments on tonight's item (Item No. H1). We do not believe an appeal is necessary given that the project was designed to be consistent with the Healthy Development Checklist as well as applicable Healthy RC standards. To be clear, the proposal is not a normal 7-Eleven, but one its new "lab" stores which includes a wide array of fresh and healthy options, which also includes a made-to-order Mexican restaurant with fresh and healthy offerings. Per the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report, "the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced with [additional] fresh food areas." In this regard, in approving the Project, the Planning Commission found that "[t]he proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1)" Specifically, the facts supporting this finding, in part, state: "As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Attachmea ®1 Of note, 7-Eleven is shedding its identity as a junk food staple. The chain wants to figure out how to change customers' perceptions that convenience food doesn't always have to be deep-fried or nutritionally sketchy. In early March 2019, the chain debuted its first "lab store," in Texas, a real-time testing ground for healthy conveniences. Outside, the store looks largely like any other 7- Eleven, with the familiar signage and gas pumps — inside, it looks a lot like a Whole Foods or any other sleek modern grocer, with natural wood accents and towers of trail mix ingredients sold in bulk. The 7-11 Lab Stores have been summarized as follows: Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical roller-grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten-free chili. Across the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you" refrigerator case, filled with grab-and-go lunch items: sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a "seasonal blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion-controlled packets of cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7- Eleven is stocked with enough gluten-free, paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness- obsessed snackers, with just enough "normal" food to resemble a small grocery store. (https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/182775 82/7- eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store) Notwithstanding our prior demonstration to healthy offerings, our office has taken the liberty to compare the project to the Healthy Development Checklist PIRggE685 and prepare notes on the project's consistency with the checklist and healthy vision. (attached). We have also attached a few snippets of offerings by 7- Eleven and Laredo Tacos from some the few Lab stores that exist today and have included many of the relevant slides provided to the Planning Commission which provide additional detail on the project. This will be one of the first 7-Eleven Lab Store in California. As I believe you will see from reviewing the attached items, you will conclude this project is anything but the normal 7-Eleven stores that exist throughout the City today. City Staff clearly communicated high standards for the project and 7-Eleven is ready to deliver on a truly state of-the art unique and modern offering for southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for your consideration. Jon From: Jonathan Shardlow Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:41 PM To: 'McPherson, Sean'; Grant Ross Subject: RE: Council Meeting Thank you Sean. Will the applicant team be given an opportunity to comment? We certainly wish to highlight the fresh and healthy offerings that would be offered by both the 7-Eleven and Laredo Taco. Jon From: McPherson, Sean [mai Ito:Sean.McPherson @cityofrc.us] Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:27 PM To: Jonathan Shardlow; Grant Ross Subject: Council Meeting Grant and Jon, Please follow the link below to access the City Council agenda for this coming Wednesday, May 19. The Council will be considering whether or not to appeal the Planning Commission's approval of your project. Reference Item H.1 on the agenda: https://ranchocucamonga.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?compiled MeetingDocumentFileld=3458 Please let me know of any questions. Thanks, Sean McPherson,AICP PllggE62B Senior Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-774-4307 1 https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store Jonathan Shardlow Shareholder Gresham Savage Nolan &Tilden, PC 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Office: (909) 890-4499 Ext. 1770 Fax: (909) 890-9877 www.GreshamSavaae.com ionathan.shardlow(a)greshamsavage.com 1. Privileged and Confidential Communication. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential or subject to the attorney client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you may not use, disclose, print, copy or disseminate the same. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this message. 2. Notice re Tax Advice. Any tax advice contained in this email, including any attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other recipient for the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties that may otherwise be imposed by the IRS, or (b) supporting, promoting, marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter to any third party. 3. Transmission of Viruses. Although this communication, and any attached documents or files, are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free, and the sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. 4. Security of Email. Electronic mail is sent over the public internet and may not be secure. Thus, we cannot guarantee the privacy or confidentiality of such information. PiRgg(683 SUMMARY CHECKLIST Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ACTIVE DESIGN 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the project X support access to neighborhood amenities (e.g., convenience store,dry cleaning,community center, cafe,etc.)within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? The project offers a variety of amenities to its customers including the opportunity to buy fresh groceries,convenience items,to dine at the restaurant,and to purchase fuel within a short walking distance from nearby residences and businesses. The project also incorporates a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio for customers to 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the project X incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? The project offers a well landscaped environment with a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio,which is easily accessible by foot bicycle, or automobile. 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the project X contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? The project is designed with pedestrian safety in mind by the incorporation of pedestrian pathways and signage to alert drivers of pedestrians.It encourages pedestrian safety with a 56'setback from Archibald Avenue. These walkways serve as a safe point of entry with access to the 7-Eleven store and Laredo Taco Restaurant within 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or X contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? The project will connect Archibald Avenue with the existing sidewalk west of the site through the construction of a sidewalk along 9th Street.The 9th Street sidewalk will connect with the existing sidewalk and Archibald Avenue. The sidewalks lead to existing crosswalks for pedestrian access to and from the project. 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project X incorporate attractive,pedestrian-scale exteriors and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? The project provides a street setback of over 56 feet,which significantly exceeds the City's development standards. The project is well landscaped and includes sidewalks and pathways that are incorporated into the property which encourages walkability. The modern architecture of the building is an upgrade to nearby o.+lo 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project X incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? Throughout the site project,there is cohesiveness between all areas leading to the gas station,indoor restaurant,and the store. PlRggE628 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage public X open space,sidewalks,pedestrian amenities,bicycle facilities,and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? The project connects well to the existing pedestrian and bicycle network and incorporates a new sidewalk the will connect Archibald Avenue to properties west of the site. Vehicle entrances are placed to connect to the existing roadway network and separate vehicle traffic from pedestrian traffic. The design cohesively is planned to connect to the adjacent community and existing modes of transportation. There are more walkways for store entrance than there is for cars which makes the area safe for residents walking up to the store on Archibald and 9th street. 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance X walkabilify by providing a highly-connected street network? The project site offers several pathways out of the site that lead to existing crosswalks. There are more walkways for the store entrance than there is for cars which makes the area safe for rPtidentt wnikinn un to the store nn Arrhihnld and 9th street. 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project provide all X residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? There are three bus routes that are all approximately less than 1 mile in distance of Arrow Route.The closest bus route,Route 85,is .02 miles(3-4 minute walk)North of the property ran by Omni trans Rut thnt it nrrPvdhle to nedPttrinnt and rPtidentt_ 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the project X provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? Archibald Avenue has an existing Class 11 bike lane that safely provides access to the site and connects with other existing bike lanes throughout the community including existing bike lanes located north and south of the property. Additionally,it is safe and convenient to use the bike lanes to and from the Metro link Station. Bike ramps are also incorporated into the project design. PIRggE629 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply PUBLIC SAFETY 11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project foster X injury prevention through the use of traffic calming features,such as bulb outs and speed humps,safe pedestrian crossings,and moderate roadway speeds? The project uses landscaping and material variety to provide for safe pedestrian crossings and to ensure that there are no conflicts with traffic. The onsite circulation and building configuration naturally rnlmc tmffir and raduras vahirla cnaarL 12. . How well does the project X incorporate safe access to schools within a reasonable walking distance? Parents,students,and school administration from the nearby elementary school can access the site using the crosswalks and sidewalks that lead to and from the site and surrounding property.. 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide adequate X neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? Lighting is critical to the owner,tenant,and customers to increase safety and prevent crime. It is for this reason that a significant amount of time,effort,and photometric simulations are prepared to determine the proper lighting to provide a safe environment and nrniart irlantifirntinn Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 14. SMOKING. How well does the project incorporate efforts X to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? Signs will be clearly posted to prohibit smoking on the premises. Employees are also tasked with monitoring and addressing should it be necessarv.. 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project X incorporate efforts to protect residents from the harmful effects of high volume roads? The traffic analysis determined that limited traffic volume is generated from the project. Additionally,an industrial project or other permitted use would likely generate more traffic than the nmiprt_ 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project mitigate X noise pollution for all residents? The building is oriented to the west away from the residences across Archibald Avenue. Additionally,the project provides acoustical screening with its large setback and landscape buffer and significantly dissipates noise pollution to the residents easterly of the 616P 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the project X mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? The project provides for the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race,color,national origin,or income by providing the community with jobs,fresh food,dining, fuel,and convenience items to this area of the City. 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project X incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? The project will incorporate HVAC systems and state of the art air circulation to ensure good air quality and a healthy environment. P@g@E627 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply COMMUNITY COHESION 19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project incorporate X spaces that facilitate social engagement? The project provides several amenities to facilitate social engagement,including indoor and outdoor seating opportunities that are available for auests who wish socialize. 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the project X incorporate facilities and access to a variety of recreational opportunities for all users? The project includes sidewalks to encourage the neighbors and adiacent businesses to walk instead of drive. 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project X incorporate facilities and access to a multi-purpose community space accessible to the public? The project offers a variety of amenities to its customers including the opportunity to buy fresh groceries,convenience items,to dine at the restaurant and purchase fuel and a well landscape environment a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio. Customers can enjoy fresh brewed coffee,fresh fruit and explore the vast Laredo Taco menu. PIRIggE692 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ACCESS TO FOOD, JOBS, AND SERVICES 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate access to X a full-service grocery store (e.g.,sells meat,dairy,fruits and vegetables)within reasonable walking distance of all residents? The project provides fresh food and groceries including dairy, fruits, vegetables and high protein choices. Nearby residents and businesses can walk to the project in less than five minutes. 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the project X incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens,edible landscaping,or small-scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? While the project tenants source much of their fresh food offerings and ingredients from local and southern California locations, the project does not provide a community garden. Nevertheless, the project provides plenty of landscaping to enjoy fresh food purchases. 24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project designate X space or provide access to a farmer's market within a reasonable walking distance? The closest farmers market is located at 10788 Foothill Boulevard, which is approximately 2.1 miles from the residences that are closest to the project. While residents can easily access the farmers market by vehicle,bicycle,or bus, the proposed project offers a variety of fresh food that is less than a 5 minute walk from where they live and therefore more convenient and accessible by foot without the need for a vehicle or public transit. 25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project maintain a X balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? The project provides the community and businesses with fresh foods by using fresh ingratiates to a community that is currently underserved. Currently,there are only a few retailers that offer food. The food that is currently offered is fast food,pre-packaged food,snack food,and liquor from local ma and pop retail environment with little oversight and operational standards. 26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote shorter X commutes and better access to jobs? The project adds approximately 15 new jobs to the community. 27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project provide X future residents with access to health services? The project provides convenient access to a limited supply of over-the-counter medications and first aid products. 28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support increased X access to affordable and high-quality childcare? Not applicable. PIRggE699 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply 29. MIXED-USE. How well does the project integrate mixed- X use development? The project integrates several uses including fresh food and groceries,convenience items,gas service,and onsite dining. 30. MIXED HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to X a mix of housing options that will allow all potential household sizes,incomes,and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? Not applicable. PIRggE69® _ Lan ' - a * :�. y l ryy 1J _ �a "Ol l ., x - Ur `1 t "Make each customer's day better, make lives easier, simplier and more convenient" Page 1 wm'O' koWhy Rancho? f r r - - s - • l 1�. 4 PIRggE69a L 0, Lab IRVING,Texas, March 27,2019 /PPhfewswire/-- Made-to-order smoothies and aqua frescos ...street tacos on handmade tortillas... a growler refill station pouring local craft beers... baked-in-store cookies and croissants... patio and inside dining areas ...The newest TEleven� location is a lab store and an experiential testing ground,where customers can try and buy the retailer's latest innovations in a revolutionary new store format. The newest 7-Eleven location in Dallas is a lab store and an experiential testing ground,where customers can try and buy the retailer's latest innovations in a revolutionary new stare format. PIRggE698 SLEvin LAB-Innovation Offerings 7-1 tt / Wrr� _dVWpf XPf .,. r ' f i W Page 4 �OfLabAmenities Some of the other innovative ideas customers will see at the new 7-Eleven lab store include: • Made-to-order coffee drinks, cold-pressed juices, smoothies and aqua frescas that give customers the option to custamiZe their drinks in a full-service beverage format. Additionally, it carries novelty beverages on tap such as nitro cold brew, kombucha and organic teas. • "The Cellar," an alcove dedicated to an expanded selection of wines and craft beers, with a nearby growler station that features a rotating selection of local craft beer, cider and ales on tap. At the growler station, customers can enjoy a draft of their favorite beverage with their meal onsite or fill a growler to take home. • A cold treats bar with frozen yogurt, ice cream and multiple tappings • Cookies, croissants and more baked-in-store daily . Digital initiatives that enhance the shopping experience. Scan & Pay technology that allows customers to skip the checkout line and pay for their (non-age-restricted) purchases on their smartphones. * Indoor and patio restaurant-style seating in the Laredo Taco Company portion of the stare as well as bar-seating across the front windows in the retail space. Page 606 MAP SLEvin go ! Fresh Locally ingredientssourced Taco Lv Fresh & Healthy options organic �. I products r r Taco concept "street taco style" _" �' • Homemade tortillas • Fresh cracked eggs ps 1y. • Fresh salsa bar In restaurant dining and patio dining • Breakfast, lunch and dinner - Mobil order • outdoor pick up window i Corporate operated restaurant MADE HERE N� , y kill 4 pn i 7t. 4 Page 601 ILEvin DOWNLOAD THE APP Technology � � MEMOS Text"711ewards"to 711.711 tore At the Pumps 111 SoD two A P E LEVEn 0% G C t}�y r�F�� FCda R It1TERW.-IOHAL PKW,,Fr>w 1 X FYJ34 433 *_ ' Members aMys get rewordM � PpipflS =qpl l - i � . _ r•:t-�h�_� r���s;_ . . . ■ 1 } •F' ■ [ R Regular &4S' 52.39` Select pump L �� , mp L Save SHOP NOW , 1' T + jqa .tIrk � — lil tyfrlll t - - •,r •� � pw PUEL NOW a FA-40s IeM IWulshlesi=1oGalxllm Select Fuel Amount RI I > scan fty u man,flay 4A Skip the Line — TRBMM -- : ME II I �NRt� �l It CHANGE PAYMENT METHOD Page 602 1 090 ffis, EV Charging 70 FUELS - - 7-Eleven Adds More EV Charging � _ g in California ELEVEn Chain partners with ChargePoint and local utility to install fast-charging � stations Owl t By Samantha Oiler on Dec.02,2019 7-Eleven is constantly innovating for customers to provide them with the best experience at stores, said Ann Scott, senior director of energy, engineering and store planning for Irving, Texas-based 7-Eleven. "Our collaboration with SCE through Charge Ready is a win-win for everyone. Fast chargers mean � : •. added convenience for electric-vehicle drivers who visit our store o . , i and cleaner air for the surrounding community. We look forward to testing and learning during this pilot." ChargePoint Network Available Combo 188-375 mi/hr CHAdeMO 62.5-125 kW (DC Fast) Page 609 wm'O' koWhy Rancho? f r r - - s - • l 1�. 4 �1 ' .��.��1 Imo,. .SY Vl.r�'�T��f•:* �' L}if .•..Yw.l r�� �. � Page 600 M ILE�In rack Record ofSuccess as aResponsible Retailer 9ET GRAPELAND E1MS1 dna4Lnand ALTA MA 94s#ImvRd � t ■ w141, v Ch6tch Sx # fa16►ci151 r 1 i )s Ivd Rancho Cucamonga a J+ 1 7 } * Xrtflw�VSftq Lrff►►w iidlll� R NORTH 9rh tMhSI CUCAMONGA +, WHESTER w 2 Wit i Page 605 9 -r .... ` j� 1, 40 fk SNACY r 4 i:- ■ Page 11 $l or L_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS - A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020- 00138; and DRC2020-00087. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 subject to the conditions of approval included as an attachment to this report. Alternatively, if the Commission determines that findings for approval cannot be made, the Commission may direct staff to return with Resolutions denying the entitlements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission denied a portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which requested off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has subsequently withdrawn their related request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00489. Based on comments at the February 24, 2021 public hearing, staff is now returning to the Commission as a General Business item to consider the remaining entitlements which the Commission did not take action on at the February 24 public hearing, specifically the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and the balance of the Conditional Use Permit relative to the operation of the service station and convenience store, which not excludes off-sale beer and wine sales. BACKGROUND: For a full history of the subject development application, reference the staff report and related attachments from the February 24, 2021 public hearing which have been included with this staff report as Exhibit 2. In addition to the portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which the Commission ultimately denied, Commissioners raised a number of questions relative to the balance of the development application at the February 24, 2021 public hearing. Specifically, the Planning Commission expressed the following concerns and questions: 1. Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see the proposed use expand fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents; Attachment 2 Page 693 2. Signage and Exterior Illumination: commissioners expressed concern that exterior illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the street; 3. Equity: several commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the Southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a convenience store and restaurant would be a benefit to the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood. 4. Concentration of Service Stations: commissioners also noted a perceived concern related to the number of service stations located within close proximity to the proposed project. After deliberating on this item, and ultimately denying the CUP request for off-sale alcohol sales, the commission continued the hearing and directed staff and the applicant to go back and consider changes to the project that might address these concerns. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Following the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the applicant revised the project in an effort to address the commission's stated concerns and questions and has amended the project to now include the following: 1. In order to improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced with fresh food areas; 2. To address concerns from the commission regarding exterior lighting and signage, lighting and signage shall be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald frontage shall be either externally illuminated or"halo" lit, so as to minimize any impacts and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be illuminated; 3. Beyond the abovementioned revisions to the project, and in response to the commission's concerns regarding this project being a high-quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant has also revised the project to include: • Electric Vehicle charging stations—the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each. The site plan has been revised to reflect the location of these chargers; • In the event that the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline; • The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and install appropriate drought tolerant landscaping. 4. Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the sale of tobacco, the applicant has agreed to not advertise any tobacco or tobacco related products along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco related products will be located behind the cashier's counter within the store, so as not to be easily accessible by minors. Regarding the perceived concentration of service stations, staff acknowledges that there are multiple service stations within close proximity to the subject location, however there is currently no "concentration ordinance" relative to the location of service stations. So, despite other service stations existing in the area, there is currently no prohibition on a service station locating at the subject site. 2 Page 609 Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations which can include convenience stores. Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings for the service station and convenience store, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, staff now feels that the project meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high -quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact: At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public 3 Page 609 health, safety, and welfare Moratorium on Service Stations: Staff notes that on April 21, 2021, the City Council approved an Urgency Ordinance enacting a 45-day moratorium on service stations throughout the City. The City Council will consider whether to extend this moratorium on June 2, 2021. This moratorium was enacted, in part, to allow staff and the City Council to study and analyze potential impacts relative to service stations, including the number and location of service stations within the City, their fiscal performance and whether or not additional regulations are necessary to ensure their compatibility with the City's goals and objectives. The subject development application was exempted from the moratorium provided that the developer obtains building permits within 6 months of the effective date of the moratorium, or by October 21, 2021. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: As now proposed, the project meets the Council's core value of "Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future," as well as "continuous improvement." Following the direction from the Commission at their February 24, 2021 meeting, the applicant has now revised the project to include a number of sustainable measures, including but not limited to the inclusion of electric vehicle chargers and ensuring that the building design will meet a minimum of LEED Silver standards. These sustainability measures intentionally embrace and anticipate the future as the City continues to seek more sustainable development. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Revised Project Description Exhibit B - Revised Site Plan and Floor Plan Exhibit C - February 24, 2021 Staff Report and Attachments Draft Resolution 21-29 Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Draft Resolution 21-30 Approving Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 Draft Resolution 21-31 Approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 4 Page 650 Revised Project Description Addressing Issues Raised by Planning Commission TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS Orbis Real Estate Partners proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant(Laredo Taco Company) A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. Orbis is eliminating its request to provide off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20—Off-Sale Beer and Wine License). All tobacco products will be located behind the cashier and only accessible by the cashier unless requested by a customer. The area previously reserved for alcohol sales floor area will be dedicated to general grocery items. The offerings of fresh food have been explained as follows: Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical roller-grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten-free chili. Across the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you"refrigerator case, filled with grab- and-go lunch items: sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a"seasonal blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion-controlled packets of cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7-Eleven is stocked with enough gluten- free,paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness-obsessed snackers, with Exhibit A Page 655 just enough"normal" food to resemble a small grocery store.I Fresh food offering will be located throughout the store concentrated near the main entrance. The project proposes to design to LEED Silver certification, and if the City provides additional time for the project to pull a building permit (5 months or more in addition to the existing 6 month deadline),project will design and certify to LEED Silver standards. The proposed landscape plan already exceeds water conservation standards. At a minimum, the project will incorporate at least 2 electrical vehicle charging stations to supply, at a minimum, charging for a single vehicle at Level 2 standard and another single vehicle at"fast-charging" standards. The sale of diesel fuel, if any, will not accommodate heavy duty trucks and will not include high- flow diesel dispensers. Although the project originally was anticipated to balance without the need of soil import, additional soil import will be required to satisfy flood protection standards. A conservative amount of 5,000 cubic yards has been estimated. The Air Quality Evaluation for the project is being updated but the Applicant's air quality consultant has already determined such amount would result in a less than significant impact. Under any scenario, the project will not require more than 5,000 cubic yards. 'https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store Page 656 { �~ VICINITY MAP i' EST o. EOH EOH— E04 EDH EEDIT�— - FOOTHILL BLVD. PROPOSED 9TH STREET RIGHT 4Q MPH ——— ' = Hego ROUTE a s A s— � — ..,IQllT � o 0 EWTiY PROPOSED LOT PROPOSED 25'BUILDING (E) SIB ALZ 4 E sr. plod •t I LINE BIKE RACK ~ R SETBACK ♦ RMAELOOD INTER ECTIO p LIMIT UNE EL=0.0, ITE 6 ST. E PRoroo pp FIRE ... MONiUMENT 51(OG 8 HYDRANT ."10.'-` •. ST. • •N . ...'. FOUR TH lo I NF R — PATIO` PROJECT DATA �g co COMMERCIAL '' ♦ _ so�o I ------ U , PROJECT INFORMATION: Z c7 PROPOSED 45'B ILDIN � w STORAGE + --- GREASE S p ❑ SETS CK APPLICANT TAT A ASSOCIATES,INC. Z b� I INTERCEPTOR ATTN:MIKE HERMAN Z I 701 N.PARKCLNTER DR. 7 b / A SANTA ANA,CA 927D5 W O C Q II II I �L I f o TEL(714)560-8615 w Of W H I I I MxERMAN.TATIGM`3 J j W W OESIpIATEp I W w J x U I IEdESTAURANT + I ARCHITECT. AAIT TTN:PMSWRUSS.ING �Y W � O PARKING I - - 701 N.PARKCENTER DR, ST Rj I I,EI O o SANTA ANA,CA 92705 - I `....... • FENA FLOOD TEL(J14)wo-asz4 = LIMIT INE I D CEL:(74)529-7992 1NRUSILTAD.COM ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 5: 0209-0.12-35-00W ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE W SWC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST • I - _ I> RANCHO WCAMONGA,CA 9173- U PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STATON CONVENIENCE STORE 5,3 Q m CONSTRUNFOR TYPE E%ISiING • •' '? I = N�j o ADJACENT CONING: NORTH. GENERAL NOUSTRIAL(G-) SOUSTORAGE �. ICI N Ip�f•I L - 7•ELEVEN I 0 d EASI. MEDEUM LREs'ENAL M ��. BUILDING .— STORE ! wesr: aNEAaL Inouswlu(c-p -� 1 1IN556 I J Ip EAISRNG ZONING: G-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL fi SF Q EKISRNG LAND UK: VACANT J I I 11 _ I PROPOSED CONING: G-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL �y L ••1••_••••-"•`•'•'. W PROPOSED LAND USE: GRWNO-UP GAS S-014-CONVENIENCE STORE IbK�i I— BUILDING INFORMATION: 12 RESIDENTIAL NET ACREAGE 37314 AT1 Da ACRES PROP SED PROPOSED KILLING AREA: 6.-SF(+M sF,5DD PARO AREA) '•'�'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•' ELEC ICAL I U PROPOSED RESTAURANT AREA: 32W5 SF fill PROPOSED CONVENIENCE AREA: E4.M5 IF I I - METE PROPOSED CANOPY AREA: a1W s S i I Imo$}+I CABIf9ET I Q BUILDING FEIGH1 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT:75 FT C¢ 3 LOT COVERAGE: IJ..F%-SD g }' DF%NATEp - PRO SED LANDSCAPING LOT cOv£RaW: m.ex za5as s R _ •♦ FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED' YES RESTAURANT TRAN FOR �° REWIRED BUIwxG SETBACMs { PARKING T j•_•,•' o FROM ARCHIBALD AVE 45 FT y$r ! STALLS FROM 9TH STREET 25 FT A {7} •1 SIDE 5 FT F s ♦'♦• REAR 0 FT } REWIRED CANOPY SETBACKS FROM ARCHIBALD 45 FT PROPOSED EVCS PROPOSED I,,• FROM 9Tx STREET 25 FT F pH qgp cRy�• E REWIRED LANDSCAPING SETBACKS �_ P SIMTCH GEAR •TRMISFCF&ER .'••. • � LC91 FRONT 45 FT •• I 1 SIDE INTERIOR, 25 FT ♦'. •','.`.` SIDE(STREET) 5FT V GO 5 • r T S E)Q G E REAR 0 FT p. L _ HYllR i KING REQUIREMENTS: Lu WNM NIFNCL PARKING REQUIRED: 14]STALLS PEA 1000 SF •' CONVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED 14 STALLS PWS MDITWAL 14 STALLS AT FUEL r DPD�r ♦ RESTAURANT PARKING REWIRED: 20 RESTAURANT USE:10 PER 1000 SF T RESTAURANT PARKING PRON'ED: 22 STALLS TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED'. 34 STNLS NNGF,2 ACCESSIBLE&BIKE PACKS a ,'�ANI.. LNG 1 TOTAL PARKING PROMOED: 36 STALLS INLL 2 ACCES5B1£2 EV&BIKE RACKS ' N JN O U FORMATION PROPOSED .9•. SIGNATW �1 P+ _ PROPOSED o { E1tCTRlcu: wuTHERN CALIFORNIA EDlwu HEALY TANK 1� CONIENCWCE I4) >♦ SHARE GAS: wuTHERN CALIFORNIA INS COMPANY rnp gy#k S �� FULL O MATCH: CUCAMONCA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ` �Y '♦C ,RIy G ��'c 10r1T MOVEM El T STGRM DRAIN: cTTr OF RARGHO WGAMWGA ST 9 T �� SANITARY SEWER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ■ R VEWAY REFUSE COLLECTOR I BURRTEC DISPOSAL ' S SITE LEGEND .5 � �+� • o�n } i BB-ImIlml-- PROPERTY LINE ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING a - --- --- 1 I -----PATH OF TRAVEL SPACE �• BUILDING SETBACK $ E UHOTY POLE EXISTING I ---------- LANDSCAPE SETBACK V (E)ARE HYDRANT T } n DRIVEWAY TO. II — 15'W DRAINAGE& BE REMOVD ';i f I / ---------- DEMO BUILDING 4 (E)STREET OCMT R UTIUTY EASEME it zs'w DRAx AGE IWf uTi1JTr bEASEMENT 'S i' 6 \ T— � CONCRETE PANNG/SIDEWAlI( 0 10' P t. �STANDARD A.C.PANNG Y SHEET: i� \ 91• I SCALE:1"=P0' �LYCSCAPE AREA Page 559 CSP-11 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 �flCCNAM PAYM KEYNOTES Z z 1❑ PRE-FABRICATED COOLER WALLS, CEILING, FLOOR, DOORS z W w Li AND RACKS. MAINTAIN 2" AIR SPACE BETWEEN COOLER Li AND ADJACENT WALLS PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS. � Z Z Z z o Q Q Q Q cn cn y- J __J J J Z Z �2 MOP SINK W W W W o o �_ U U w �3 PROVIDE SPACE FOR RECESSED BOX IN WALL FOR CO2 0 0 0 0 0 wOf LINES AND PVC CONDUIT FOR POST MIX AND SLURPEE W W W W = 0 > N N > w I- w MACHINES. W W W W J J Of of Of O O O O O O O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r 7 I- N IN CD CO ID \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �"� Ln CO CO CD O O CD CD CD CD 111'-4" > rq Lo (0 I- 00 0') 3' 1 3/4" 3'-0" 46'-7 1/2" 2'-6" 2'-1" 3'-2 1/4" 50'-9 3/4" COOLER FIRE VAULT FREEZER RISER 110B 108 111 i kill 1 M 1 0 0 „>, „,F; o 0 L COOLER VAULTco ti CD M 110 17-3" GENERAL NOTES w o U U M =u z ZJ-y 11 o z z a J 1111 Lj I5' 0" 6'-5 1/2" LLIz z Q 0 I�_ FRESH FOOD >ui ; p U p N IL LL BACKROOM 8'-4" 9'-5" � COOLER J uj 00 110C W w J =U 104 T-5 1/2" LOW-TEMP NOVELTY& O N WOMENS N MENSm LLJ U �� RESTROOM RESTROOM- so so ao COOLER ~ U Q z L JH im105 106 Q Q a, s1 a, s1 VAULT =F Lo o zp. 110A o = v N M 81 81 81 81 O 1. 8'-7" 9'-9 1/4" 2 T-5" 83 8 83 8 83 8 83 8 4'-101/2" _ z. 4 O M V V V N 6Z6 vn l2i 4 FOOD e 0 3 o FRESH PRODUCE W £� £� 114 so 112 ■ w 0 �0 - 0 � � � — --- ------- ---- 9'-2 1/2" 5'_3" 6_5" 6_5" O? CUP TOWER 8 81 '-2" O �✓ p i wl TRASH BELOW. 3'-6" W �O O� --- ---- ---- FD 83 8 CUP TO 3 w/TRASH BELO O D N 83 8 co n 0 91 W Al CC) tmsn i•'M D D° ❑D 0 m04 oo n CUPTTRASH O w/ FJO 8'_6" CV N Q C4 E 4'-6" u U w O N �❑ N o $3 DD° MERCHANDISE Q 'o 0 6 n DO°0 O O\ U o 6'-1 1/2" ?° ^ ^ 3 ¢o o 4 <D Do o a I? w 0 11 a w � <'o- � ®® 3 va oo°a c z 51 N FS 5 ❑ OFFICE N DINING 0 W O CUP TOWER 103 ao o e 115 w/TRASH BELOW.. a ❑ - MICRO MATIC TA O M — — — — — — — — — — - U P U Q O M RAS RAS RAS �RAS N O O� 00 _ Ln ~ o zs SALES STORAGE �� o 102 � 113 NN N Q o M L.1_ c NU) J M 950 0 N v ® W II O �O O� 950 ® TP 1 110 2 � N T m _ M co �O O � � U cotEo C co 3 0 coO 0 4 0 9-0 4-0o � Q � o � _— z o O Lj N 27'-4" 17'-0" 16-11 1/4" 7'-4 1/4" 12'-2 1/2" 16-0 1/2" 16' 0"(VARIES) Z Z w � U ri 11 V-10 1/2" o o W - 0 U Z a o a w ~ O o Q O C V) U _O CUw � O 0 N7 Z CC CD IJi 0 O w 0 0 N O N SHEET:N mz A2 . 0 oz z FLOOR PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 o Page 558 Page 650 Page 114 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 24, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020-00459 (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS — A new commercial building with a service station and convenience store proposing off-site alcohol sales (Type 20) located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209- 032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommend that the City Council deny the request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459, and direct staff to return to the Planning Commission with Resolutions as appropriate. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. While the project meets all relevant development standards for site design and architecture, the convenience store proposes off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20)across the street from an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and within a census tract (Census Tract 21.05)which has been found to be among the most overconcentrated census tracts for off-sale alcohol licenses within the City. Over the course of two neighborhood meetings, neighbors have expressed concerns which are substantiated by facts related to the proximity of the project to the school and overconcentration within the census tract. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of the project. BACKGROUND: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial (GI). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping). This existing building is proposed to remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. Exhibit C Page 659 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 2 The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District PROJECT ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) with off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20 — Off-Sale Beer and Wine License) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco Company)which proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41 — On-sale Beer and Wine—Eating Places License). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The driveway entrance and parking lot of the existing multi-tenant commercial building at the southern portion of the property is proposed to be reconfigured because of this project. The applicant has provided a Project Description (Exhibit C) describing the proposed 7-Eleven convenience store portion of the project as a "new lab store concept." According to the applicant, this concept differs from a conventional convenience store by providing the following amenities: made-to-order specialty drinks, self-serve specialty coffee, cold treats bar (yogurt, ice cream, etc.), and a "Cellar," which houses a variety of beers and wines for sale. In addition,the applicant describes the Laredo Taco Company restaurant as serving fresh Mexican food made-to-order. The 7-Eleven and service station component of the project proposes to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, whereas Laredo Taco Company proposes to operate 5:00 AM to 10:OOPM every day. The proposed project is consistent with all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard approx. Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet (1-foot increment from the feet (fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling cano Page 2 of 9 Page 660 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 3 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback (9th Min. 25 feet feet (proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet (fueling cano Street Side Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (9th Average Depth of 25 feet (9th Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet (9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet cano 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landscaping: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls. This results in an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Convenience 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 Store at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9th Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Page 3 of 9 Page 663 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 4 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164: The project includes a proposal to subdivide the existing subject parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9t" Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Upon reviewing the application, staff identified certain concerns with the proposed development, particularly related to the request for the PCN and the related CUP. Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459: The project requires a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) pursuant to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulations and state law to allow an off-sale alcohol license (Type 20) related to the proposed convenience store within a census tract where alcohol licenses exceed concentration limits established by state law. The applicant has provided a Letter of Justification supporting their request for a PCN, which is included with this report as Exhibit D. Regarding the request for PCN, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, is overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses. ABC permits 3 off-sale alcohol licenses within Census Tract 21.05; the proposed convenience store would constitute the ninth off-sale alcohol license within the census tract. Staff notes that according to a conversation with ABC staff, there are currently 7 active licenses and 1 pending license, in addition to 7-Eleven's request. Pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4, an "undue concentration" of off-sale retail license applications exists under either of the following two scenarios: (1) "The applicant premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes . . . than the average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency;" or (2) "the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located." According to ABC personnel, Census Tract 21.05 is already significantly overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses under the second standard. This means an undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within the census tract. According to ABC's online database, there are 23 census tracts within Rancho Cucamonga where at least one off-sale alcohol license has been issued, and only one other census tract has 9 off-sale alcohol licenses (Census Tract 20.36 — Terra Vista). Therefore, if approved, the requested PCN would make the subject Census Tract 21.05 equal to the most overconcentrated census tract in the City. Exhibit E included with this staff report graphically illustrates the boundary of Census Tract 21.05, highlighting the location of these uses. An undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within this census tract by three times the state's standard, and staff acknowledges that these facts correspond to the concerns raised by neighbors over the course of two neighborhood meetings held for the project. Another concern relative to off-sale alcohol sales is the project's proximity to an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and potential for this to result in an increase in alcohol and tobacco sales to minors. While Cucamonga Elementary School is located immediately to the northeast of the project site across the Archibald Avenue and 9t" Street intersection, staff also notes that the project site is within close proximity to Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, approximately 1,800 feet to the east. Staff notes that the Sherriff's Department recently conducted an operation at 22 off-sale establishments Citywide in which 4 locations, all within close proximity to schools (2 elementary, 1 private, and 1 high school), were caught selling alcohol and tobacco to underage minors. While these incidences were not directly related to the proposed 7-Eleven, this information supports concerns raised by neighbors during two neighborhood Page 4 of 9 Page 669 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 5 meetings held for the project and illustrates a sensitivity to locating such uses near schools Finding: The Development Code provides no findings for PCNs. Rather, ABC regulates the distribution of alcohol licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract pursuant to Sections 23958 and 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code. As described above, the limits are calculated based on the ratio of alcohol licenses to the population within a specific census tract. In cases where a census tract exceeds the allowable limit of certain alcohol licenses (i.e., creates an "undue concentration"), findings in support of a PCN are required to be made by the local governing body. For Rancho Cucamonga, the local governing body is the City Council. The Business and Professions Code does not define the phrase "public convenience or necessity." According to the courts, this means that "the discretion to make that decision includes the discretion to determine the relevant factors on a case-by-case basis." (Nick v. City of Lake Forest, 232 Cal.AppAth 871 (2014)). Decision makers are afforded considerable discretion in making this determination. Fact: Issuing the ABC license to the applicant does not serve the public convenience or necessity because: 1)there is already a significant undue concentration of off-sale alcohol licenses in the subject census tract; 2), the license site is near a school, which data provided by the Sherriff's Department suggests could result in an increase in the number of minors obtaining alcohol; and 3) both of these reasons were expressed by multiple neighbors as part of two public neighborhood meetings. Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00787: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine sales. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations, convenience stores, and alcoholic beverage sales. Further, Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code defines that convenience stores "may be part of a service station or an independent facility." The code also describes alcoholic beverage sales as "the retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by...ABC...as an off-sale establishment." Therefore, one CUP is required to allow the convenience store with service station that functions as an "off-sale establishment."As such, by permitting the requested off-sale alcohol sales, approval of the CUP would exacerbate the overconcentration within the census tract as it is related to the request for a PCN. The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below, specifically Findings #1 and #3, do not support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: General Plan Goal LU-1, requires that the City "Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community-serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents." Policy LU-1.1 further requires that the City "Protect neighborhoods from the Page 5 of 9 Page 669 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 6 encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment."Similarly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." The project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol within an overconcentrated census tract. If permitted,the census tract would contain three times the number of off-sale alcohol licenses that constitute undue concentration under state law. This would be the highest number of licenses within a census tract within the City. This concern of overconcentration has been clearly expressed by neighborhood residents over the course of two neighborhood meetings. Further, while the proposed restaurant component increases the availability of food establishments, the immediate vicinity is already well served, or planned to be well served by service stations and convenience stores, in addition to the noted overconcentration of alcohol off-sales. Therefore, approving such a use is not consistent with the stated goals and policies of General Plan Land Use Goals LU-1 and LU-6. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact:As noted above, the project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol sales within an overconcentrated census tract. The project site is also located across the street from an elementary school. Data from the Sherriff's Department suggests that there is a correlation between the proximity of convenience stores and schools which may increase the potential for alcohol and tobacco sales to minors, as evidenced at other locations throughout the City of similar uses within close proximity to schools. Therefore, the proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. B. Neighborhood Meetings and Neighborhood Concerns: As part of the development review process, the applicant and developer held a Neighborhood Meeting on November 10, 2020, to solicit comments from the surrounding property owners. About 6-7 participants attended virtually. All participants at this meeting expressed opposition to the project, and generally raised the following concerns: perception of high number of service stations and liquor/convenience stores within the area; proximity of the project to Cucamonga Elementary School; concern over hours of operation; and concerns regarding traffic, noise and glare. As a result of the type of concerns raised by residents at this meeting, staff initiated a second Neighborhood Meeting which was held on January 11, 2021. To ensure maximum neighborhood participation for this second meeting, City staff expanded the radius for mailed notices to include over 300 mailers printed in both English and Spanish. A Spanish interpreter was also present at the second meeting. Approximately 12 residents attended this second Neighborhood Meeting and many of the same concerns were raised, with one resident expressing support for the project. As this report has already covered concerns related to the overconcentration of off-sale alcohol, which was a prominent concern raised by the neighbors, staff responds to the remaining neighbor concerns as follows: Page 6 of 9 Page 600 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 7 1. Perceived Concentration of Service Stations: Regarding service stations, there is no "concentration ordinance" in the Development Code which regulates the number of service stations within the City. However, staff acknowledges the neighbor's comments that there are multiple service stations within the vicinity of the subject project. While there is only one service station currently within Census Tract 21.05 (Valero Station, 8514 Vineyard) slightly over a mile from the proposed project, 3 other service stations exist within 1 mile of the project site (76 Station at 10075 Arrow Route, Kwik Sery at 9524 Foothill Boulevard, and Shell Gas at 7996 Archibald Avenue). Staff notes that another service station about '/4 of a mile to the north of the project site was approved as part of DRC2015-00682 in July 2018 to rehabilitate an existing abandoned service station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. It is not known at this time when that service station rehabilitation project may begin construction. Exhibit E also provides the location of service stations within the project vicinity. Staff notes for the Commission's information that Each of these service stations include off-sale alcohol. 2. Hours of Operation: multiple residents raised concerns regarding potential impacts associated with the proposed hours of operation, including an increase in crime and noise. Staff notes that the proposed convenience store and service station will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the Laredo Taco Company proposing hours of 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM, 7 days a week. 3. Traffic, Noise and Glare: Residents expressed concern over potential for increased traffic related to the service station. Staff notes that the project applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis(Urban Crossroads, February 2021), which demonstrates that no significant traffic impacts will occur as a result of this project. To off-set any potential traffic deficiencies, certain traffic improvements to the Archibald and 9th Street, intersection will be required. These improvements generally include modifying existing lanes to accommodate a shared left-through lane and dedicated right turn lane in conjunction with a modification to the traffic signal to accommodate right-turn overlap phasing. Similar improvements at the City's request, and at the applicant's cost, have been identified for the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection, as well. Regarding Noise, the applicant also provided an Acoustical Study (Urban Crossroads, September 2020) which demonstrates that the project will not result in any significant increase in either construction or operational noise. Lastly, the applicant has provided staff with a preliminary Lighting Plan which demonstrates that the project will meet all required lighting standards, thus limiting the potential for adverse impacts on adjacent properties. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on January 19, 2021. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised one design issues related to whether or not two tri-colored metal band features proposed to wrap around the building and fueling canopy should be illuminated. The committee recommended that that tri-colored band should be illuminated, provided that this element comply with all relevant lighting and glare standards. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. For reference on the full discussion related to design and architecture, Exhibits F and G included with this report provide the DRC Comments and Minutes, as well as 3D renderings of the project. F. Fiscal impact Analysis: The Fiscal Impact Analysis(The Natelson Dale Group, Inc.) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide an annual net fiscal benefit of approximately $114,000 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. Generally, new recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also Page 7 of 9 Page 685 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 8 be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. G. Options for the Planning Commission to Consider: While the Planning Commission considers staff's recommendation to deny the application, the Commission may consider the following options: 1. Uphold staff's recommendation to deny application and recommend denial of the PCN to City Council; 2. Reject staff's recommendation and approve the application, and recommend that the City Council approve the PCN; 3. Consider approving (or in the case of the PCN, recommending approval of,) certain entitlements relative to the project application while denying other entitlements. For example, approving the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and CUP, but recommending denial of the PCN, so that the project may be constructed without authorization of off-site sales; 4. Explain to the applicant which aspects of the project the commission finds favorable, direct the applicant to revise the project, and set a continued hearing to a future date. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). Staff notes that, if the project is denied, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. Any correspondence received prior to the public hearing will be provided to the Commission under separate cover. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: For reasons discussed in this report, particularly as it relates to the project's potential to exacerbate an existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses, staff notes that the project will not achieve the City Council's Core Value to "promote and enhance a safe and healthy community." EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Page 8 of 9 Page 6136 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit B: Project Plans Exhibit C: Applicant's Project Description Exhibit D: Applicant's Letter of Justification for PCN Exhibit E: Census Tract 21.05 Vicinity Map Exhibit F: January 19 DRC Comment Letter and Action Minutes Exhibit G: 3D Renderings Page 9 of 9 Page 680 �k•: I t f Map/AerialPhotograph - - _ S R Subject site: a r . , .. •. • t r' % ��"'.44 T 1 t'c Oin 010 l Exhlibit A — . �020 Gnog!eG ogle r EaLtt, ' �f VICINITY MAP —EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH c EOH—EO—EOH—EOH—EOH E H CEO EOH—EOH—EOH =§ Y 8 8 FOOTHILL BLVD Ed 25 . - 66 PROPOSED 9TH STREET - ---— ——— RIGHT 40MPH ——— b --- - _ �a{�}X��q,, ARRO RDUTE m N —_—_ — E4PAY —`— --------�/ _ TVJ' o E TH Sr o0 _ Co PROPOSED LOT PROPOSED Sl e e sT. - LINE BIKE RACK SETBACK LNG ♦ FEMA FLOOD(N)TERS CT MIT LINE ITE " E PROPOSED FIRE • ' MONUMENT SIGN rc ro.'.'.'." . . HYDRANT '.rn.'.'.'.' i '."io,•,.... . . W .2z22 57 2 ° 1 n/ L PATIO f PROJECT DATA oN� a COMMERCIAL ♦ s6Xs0 U� Mxa a r PROPOSED 45'B ILDING PROJECT INFORMATION: Z C7 �o w STORAGE . ____, GREASE ' ..q E6 SETe K APPDCANi: rack ASSOCIATES,INC. �� F j1 ° ATTN MIKE HERMANINTERCEPTOR W701 N.PARKCETERDR. Ig ZWO6 N pEdll <.e�". ° SANTA ANA,CA 92705 a a2 a 0 ME:(714)560-8615DEL p W a 7 p MHERMA1NWAIT.COM3 J it W m7 W DESIGNATED f • jy w J=0 I RESTAURANT ARCHITECT. Tut t ASSOCIATED INC. y ATIR ON VIRUS W�0 Z p O,� PARKING ^I' 701 N.PARKCENTER DR. 0 I ®E I I' SANTA NA, A 9270 5 Z STALLS w x aFEMA FLOOD TEL 71e W-E624 I 3 LIMIT ENE � cee p1a)529 799z I rnmisoraTWM it It + L I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) : 0209-033-35-0000 I p 1 l I N3 I uJ AD— ME ARCHIBALI AVENUE .:•:♦:•••:•:LL.• SWC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST RANCHO OJCAMONGA,CA 917M PR0.CCT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STANON-CONVENIENCE SUE 28. ' 20' 30' 0 I Q O1 CONSTRUCTOR Tree EXISTING - 6D.5' 56 2 n=n O ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: GENERAL INWSIMAL(G-Q LL OUUTH: GENERAL INOUSTPoAL(M) STORAGE . N j Ip Opjdil j 7-ELEVEN I Q EAST: GENERA INDUSINAL(G) 0 BUILDING �. STORE xEST GENERAL MWSTRTAL c-I p 11 DX66 I.J 11A.Il ZONING G-I-cExFRAL INDUSTRIAL N ICI i• 6I600 6 Q ONG LAND USE: VACANT M PROPOSED ZONING: G-1-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL W 4 N y PROPUSED LAND USE GROUND-UP GAS STAl -CON fl ENGE STARE Ipogel qq I— BUILDING INFORMATION: 0) li<T, NET ACREAGE: E73.314 SF I.fiB ACRES I. PROPSED = RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 6,6005E(i 3,600ff PATO AREA) ➢q, I ELEC RICAL I PROPOSED RESTAURANT AREA: :zoos SF %8os U ME PRUPO 1)CONVENIENCE AREA E4,595 SF u r E TE N ° PROPOSED CANOPY AREA 3.1e0 SF Ip048I 0> I. CABIl ET ILL BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWABLE BULDING HBGIT:75 R Ng" iE e 0' Q LOi COYERACE: 13.3%(9.780 W) LANDSCAPING LOT COYERACE: 318R 23.306 SF) 6 F=o i/ DESIGNATED W PROP SED FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: AS ° RESTAURANT 3, " TRAN FORM 1 PARKING _ REouIRED BuaDING SETBACKS Il T� maM ARaEBALO Av£ as Fr STALLS ,. T I o Ipoj�I ' FROM 91H STREET SFr F (7) N • I SIDE 5 FT o . •� REAR OFT S R f -- 0... 8 ••125 5• ••'�'•'". 1 6` REQUIRED&I ARC MCI SETBACKS TRW457 ` m ' IIBAW AYE 45 FT F \�Y -sm>� Fl✓aLl 91H STREET 217 YI _' '• .:•�•..,', .J: 45'B ILDIN I RFQUERFDLPNDSCAAxc sFTBncus �_ n •.•• SETS CK I SIDE TINTB11aR 5FT 11 •' V •.7S ".'."• SIDE(STREET) 5 FT N O IL aI N F REPR ' ' .ST'AC N.G.t>ISfA E EXIST G FIE O5 0 0 R I PARKING REQUIREMENTS W ®, O `q4 • HYDR HITCONVENIENCE PARKING REQUIRED: 14 3 STALLS PER TWO SF N a COUVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED: 14 STALLS(PLUS AWERONAE 14 O SS AT FUEL m ( W y PROPOSED I RESTAURANT PARKING REWIRED: 20(RESTAURANT USE:10 PER TWO 47 ' m RESTAURANT PARKING PRONGED: 22 Si4ll5 c Y • 1 i AT ER_ DESIGNATED I TOTAL PARKING REWIRW: 34 11—(MIL 2 ACCESSIBLE 8 BINI RACKS) 0 j L ONVENIENCE i4 PR D TF.H M TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 36 S1ALL5(INCL 2 ACCESSIBLE 2 EV 8 BIKE RACKS) ' W y W V PR POS UTILITY INFORMATON: PROPOSED 9' DESIGNATED EN --PARKING ° BIG RICAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON e = HEALY TANK '� CONVENIENCE �♦ S ARE rr cns: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY • • ST E (5) ULL L WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRCT / ■ ARKI G O E,f7r�l MO ME T U STORM DRINK: CITY OF RANCHOLCUCAHWGA k STA LS 9 „ SANITARY SEWER. WCANWGA VALE 1 OU R V 7w 11 REFUSE CgLEcnW: GIRRTFC DISFosALr wATE Effie/ 3 ° R D1STrncT 5) I SITE LEGEND ��® s PROPERTY DNE ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING ------ PATH OF TRAVEL SPACE BUILDING SETBACK $ (E)UTILITY POLE TV EXISTING I ( -------- DRIVEWAY TO LANDSCAPE SETBACK � (E)FIRE HYDRANT iS W DRAINAGE& DRAINAGE& BE REMOVED — — DEMO BUILDING Q (E)STREET LIGHT UTILITY EASEMENT ZUTILITYY EASEMENT " I E lb l ° O CONCRETE PAMNC/SIDEWALK \ I m (SCALE:1 � O STANDARD A.C.RIMING \ \ I LANDSCAPE AREA Page 669 SHEET CSP-9 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN zo�SCALE: 1 ®DECORATIVE PAVING =r-o^ KEYNOTES zz 1❑ PRE-FABRICATED COOLER WALLS, CEILING, FLOOR, DOORS z w AND RACKS. MAINTAIN 2" AIR SPACE BETWEEN COOLER � AND ADJACENT WALLS PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS. Q a-a- o- a- o cno �2 MOP SINK L W W W Li _� z �_ U H P H W U U > > �3 PROVIDE SPACE FOR RECESSED BOX IN WALL FOR CO2 0 0 0 0 0 w Li LINES AND PVC CONDUIT FOR POST MIX AND SLURPEE cn cn � z Z MACHINES. > > > > W W W Li W W J J D' Of [if O_ U U U O O O O O O O M r N O coCD ro CD \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ln CO 00 O O O O O O O 111'-4" r7 Ln U r- 03 m 3'-1 3/4" 3'-0" 46'-7 1/2" 2'6" 2'-1" 3'-2 1/4" 50'-9 3/4" COOLER FIRE VAULT FREEZER RISER 110B 108 111 1 ❑ M CD O O \ / / m N COOLER VAULT1r 3° X O pip0 GENERAL NOTES v � M =Q _ a '—' �1 0_ L z Q J ------ El � - v PERCENTAGE OF ALCOHOL SALES: 5% Z L W z a � 5'o" q 1/2" 363.9 SF /6,966.4 SF = .05 w — z Q qLoNW BEER CAVE TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 6,966.4 SFj / \ / \ I/ \ I/ \ Lu W ;BACKROOM s'4° 9' S° LL J of LIJ mc'l 3'-5 1/2" BEER CAVE AREA: 235.5 SF W W J =U WOMENS N MENS WINE SALES AREA: 135.4 SF , m W U Oz LE �oL)L) RESTROOM RESTROOM- ~ U ' Q Z ao ao so COOLER TOTAL ALCOHOL SALE AREA: 363.9 SF 2 Q aL Ju 105 106 a� s� a� a� VAULT O - N c. co � M 81 81 81 81 - � 2 8'-7" 9'9 1/4" v 7�-5" 83 8 83 8 83 8 83 8 c7 / ME2O V V 0 4 4O co IM n A 9l6 lM la r FOOD m 3 WINE W Q - 114 ao ■ a ' M 112 9'-2 1/2" 5'-3' 5'-5" 5'-5" s� O ( fj� CUPTOWER ® 8'-2„ S wI TRASH BELO V 3'-6nZIA J� � z ® 83 8 FD CUPTOWER 9 DQ 3 CV wl TRASH BELO ❑D O 83 a 191 0 w 0 „ n0 ooDo as D00 DO M 0 s >w cuPr DO o0 - 0' p co O w/TRASH �O 8'-6" N Q Q O L w 4'-6" u c> co� o ❑❑ N o = 03 Da 0 MERCHANDISE �Q �.� a o v o y 0 101 6'-1 1/2" ?c ^^ 3 ¢`o a a Do 0a �� o � rnoF C� M wo I <o Do o a a 3 °a`OO_° O rn 3 Uz DINING ~ Fs ❑ ❑ OFFICE N e 115 CUP TOWER 103 Lu co Ow/TRASH BELOW 9 V co MICRO MATIC TAP.m.. - rn U ❑ a a coM RAS RA RAS RAS � N 00 o °� NNW o Za SALES STORAGE o 102 � 113 _ � "' O m � N (n J M sso 0 0 T CD NN o v ® ® W II O 0 2 950 GS TP 0 � O o ri c M 070 E o U a 0 c i o m �_ C 4'-0" 9'-0" 4'-0" w- 2OZZ , Z 1 Z c 27'-4" 17'-0" 15'-11 1/4" 7'-4 1/4" 12'-2 1/2" 16-0 1/2" 16'-0"(VARIES)CD Zz W Z U n CD 111'-101/2" i IN c o 0 N z 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 I o SHEET: ww �w o Z A2 . 0 SCALE: z� FLOOR PLAN�� 3/16" = 1'-0" �o Page 570 Page 662 Page 126 =dada= ❑o a �" �aRnaer ITITIT M ...... .............................. T.O.LOC4NOPV oc• M w Z U � mQ as as as as as LU as J W ZQ� W a a a Lu >aU ❑ ............ LU .................. a a a a a e A I rill I I 111111Wm Wuo F FINI9H FLOOR FINISH FLOOR Q t�Q Z W 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-EAST(FACING ARCHIBALD AVE.) SCALE: 2 1�� %ooS n$ M-5 F � F � - C T�'O.PARPPEi .O.PNUPEf�' N W II Ul � a m M ' m T.O.LTC CPNOPY � U � � L { W A ❑ U o.CnrvoPv N�,!�6�I1 �@@ gg ageg 51 �5€ss� 2sy a a a a a a a a s a ��® s�� ........................ a FINISH FLOOR FINISH FLOOR ^ E�= r� d 2 Page 603 SHEET A3.O EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST(STOREFRONT) a/1sA p-�^ $P �C E oa ao-o � Z •.;y firs:-' .. —Pri.iiEcviv�•� b Lu W L > 0 t9 FW �'iwSH Rope 13yQg1 n6� ty 0 6 C E E E A C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-EAST{FACING ARCH IBALO AVE.) ,,g°`E-0 2 ■ m 1111 !1111 x F � F 5 3 Y B 2 S r 0r�awn ti n P � 3 o vxvr�i•. A — l7i 67 m � N l �• 5 Page 609 SHEA3.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST(STOREFRONT) 1 KEYNOTES ❑o a �" ITITIT �'T.O.VARAPET i.0.PANAPET�' 14'E' CCPNOPY TO LTC OAN� Qm N'TO.GWOPY iO.GANppyY ZU MFU O Zrc WZ W Zap w Wo 9 a W i >aU O Jp Wm❑ W w JSU W hh A m Wu0 � FFLOOR FINISH FLOOR _ Q K W EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE z 1�. W 38os M-5 I � F � F � � r �'TO.PAHAPET � N TO.PANAPET�' V1 a m M ' m m c AA ���� ❑ U eT.O.GWOPY ... �MUCH A A - FINISHFLOOR r� d 2 Page 609 SHEET: AV.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-SOUTH MATERIAL SAMPLES k k k k z VINTFGEW OD CEDAR EMPIREBLOCN GRAY 888 qq t p NPCHIHA FIBER CEMENT SIDING FIBER CEMENT PANELS C E s z s oa D A �nva uaa ivare. uwru� 154 DARN BRONZE SILVERPONTE-SW 785E CENTRIA-EOONOLAP IR' I SHERWN WILLLAIAS CORRUGATED METAL SIDING N �$0 JT w9 C Lv J m' w e TRLCORNBLACN-5WWM REFLECTIVE WHITE-SATW w SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWINVALLAAMS n C E C E C E E H E i3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREETS ,g E 2 pl. ■ m FINISHES EIFSSTSTU FIa$N;$TIh^CO d SFR: STOREFRONT DNT p g FINISH:ANppIgDAIIAANDM MFR: FIBER CEMENT SIDING k FINISH:VINTAGEWODD-CEDER MFR: NICHIHA F 3 FIBER CEMENT PANELS FINISH:EMPIHEBLOOK-GRAY F MFR: NICHIHA CORRUGATED METAL SIDING a FII$H:DARK BROmm J T IAFR: CEHTRIA n r� _ Pc� PETAL CLADDING N -. LJ Fes:EMPIIRESL.00K•GRAY MFR: y. m MATERIAL SAMPLES . NkFIKA FIBER O PAENT Sum .. B-IREBLOCR•GRAY NLCHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL Byk�yyu� e ... CENTR NBRONZE E�S�i� � C GENTILE E +lL n� y 51lVERPOINTE-SYY 7859 9 SHERWIN WILLIALIS E TRICORN BLACK-SW 6258 A B D T� E $NERwINvaI.LWMg @ REFLECTIVE WHITE•$W 7757 is $HERWIN"LLWA$ PATS 985 G Page�. 66® A3.1 C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-SOUTH , , 1 sLAa MATERIAL SAMPLES .|§ )I§ ___,_ � |||||§ __ma �l +7. m�� m 7 � ■� � K | AMS z !-LLI z u LLJ■ ! ' ¥a -j _ �. . Lij ~} \ ) � \ ' � | c EXTERIOR ELEVATION-Nd T(FACING 9TH STR ) 2 FINISHES ) ] ___ , ■ MFR FlNlSH: ��O r | « � � § f «', � k ; § | � � °l-, / i 21 | MATERIAL SAMPLES | AESTHETIC WMTE-SW 7M -, -UAYAS . am_____ § ' SHEET Page�5 A3.2C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST . \ 1 — KEYNOTES INTERCOM CALL B-MECHANICALLY FASTENEU TO COLUMN. i MWNT AT 461NCHES MA%.ABOVE SIAB TO BUTTON _ Ed OFIRE E%iINGUISHER-ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE MAK.1&INCHES FROM GRADE TO PAPER TOWEL OPENING S �3 —ET%dFEETRLUMINATED LOGO SIGN(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) r S S S S S OTATE—A IMAGE TRIGTRIPE(NON-ILLUMINATED) �B OVERFLOW PROTECTION AS REQUIRED.SEE CANOPY DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIQANONS n N �B WASHBUCKET ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE—INCHES FROM GRADETO PAPER �rc TOWEL OPENING GASDISPENSER — OCANOPY COLUMN O\ ACM CANOPY FAECW i IT'If �TSB �f — TO.CPNOPY�' 1E0 NOT USED 3 O NOT USED 5 — 41 BO.CANOPY O NOT USED 4 9 B 13 PARKING BOLLARD STORESIDE STREETSIDE Ln N z F° O Z v=a a _z C) w Zrc_ mz w W > B W> zoo wU 0 �H > Z W O aN LLQ Jrc wUU a w —j o Inl Ja= IJ a LL1 z FINISH FLW = a w K 13 T TYP. TYP. EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE: z 1�. W iE 38os _„ n$I sgpF I � F � F � 21" 2 T.O� O R N Y = N � � W G CANOPY U1 .. B.O. O T m I. m c m DO O U IFO o g � e5 � 13 FINISH R-04 SHEET Page 608 A3. 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST ,4°A;Eo. 1 2 (2)WHORIZOMABPR AT TOP BOND BEAM GENERAL NOTES 2d'OVERLAP AROUNOGORNERS. 8'X S'X IS'PRECISION BLOCKSOUG 1. TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOW: GROUT INTERIOR SURFACE TO BE SMOOTH A ROOF WITH A MINIMUM CLEARANCE HEIGHT TO ALLOW THE BIN LID TO COMPLETELY i ANDNONABSORBANT.APPLVAIPHATIC OPEN R . _ UEI EGLOSSENAMEL-DEVTHAN— CM RU U WALL GAP tt B.CONSTCTED OF REINFORCED MASONRY WITHOUT WOODEN GATES,AND WALL BY IC.DEVOE COATING OVER EPDXY (COL— SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 FEET HIGH. PRIMER-TRU GLAEE WB 4030 BY ICI. MATCH WALL) C,PROVISION OF CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR. STUCCO PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. D.ALL TRASH BINS INTHETRASH ENCLOSURESHALSEIEANPROOFWITH UDSTHAT p a Q Q Q z EXTERIOR FINISH STUCCO PMM ARECONTINUOUSLYKEPTGLOSED, u _ MIN.2 COATS TO MATCH BUILDING N -- 9 r--- ❑o INTERIOR - ANORIZONTAL REBAR AT TOP B MID HEIGHT SIDE W VERTICAL REBAR AT 16.O.G.IN PGG FILLED CELLS WITH ALTERNATE BENDS Q\ N ry GA.METAL WEEP SCREED 321 A4 GONT REBAR TOP AND BOnOM 'CLEAR FROM EDGE OF FOUNDATION "' ^4 3"OUR. A15 fi Y :.21 ....: WALL SECTION P,gC-- 1 6IM A1.5 n M N n 0 U M�a wU) Z> G) > �a❑ 8 6 9 8 B ;p W Jp Q O PO T.O.ENCLOSURE i.O.ENCLOSURE Lu >a ZZ FRAMING h FRAMING J p �f,�m❑ Q S Lu W1O zL1 U I, F Ir J Q Q ry tltl = p P. W A1.5 REF.GML ENCL.S go CIVIL ENCLOSURE ELEVATION S°ALE: 6 ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: C HEALY ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 4 KEYNOTES � • 3l8'=1'-0" 3/8'=1'-0' J 3l8"=1'-0" 1 W �1 T"THICK KC LOADING PAD OVER 9D%COMPACTED BASE,4%MAXIMUM SLOPE. 13 12 SLOPE PF—PVC SLEEVES IN CONCRETE TYP. DI-PER FT. ➢q m B.O.ENCLOSURE ROOFh �3 6-PCC CURB AROUND INSIDE PERIMETER OF ENCLOSURE. %ooS B.O.ENCL.ROOF �4 6-PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH CONCRETE TYP.OF 5. oG� p_g TYP. T TYP. 6 9 6 14 �5 8"X8'X 16 PRECISON BLOCK WITH STUCCO FINISH TO.ENCLOSURE FRAMING 6U O 10"XPXIA—LIDCONCRETECPP. (3)HEAVYDUTY METAL HINGE,COMNUOUSLYWELDEDTOGATE AdDJAMSTUSE. L f 1318'CORRUGATED META PANEL WELDED TO-META ANGLE WITH DIAGONAL r p TYP § 8 1 ) 9 BRACING,CONTIN000S WELDALJOINTS:PRIMEANDVAINT. `` e S116'META PLATE WITH SURE BOLTASSEMBLY WELDED IN PLACE. r — C 11 10 CANE BOLT PND CANE BOLT RECEPTACLE. ENCLOSURE LING 9 1�1 PC S'RAISED P WAKWAV. ❑ ILQ, NO S HSS eM---BEAM(TYP.) rr f N N v. w p o 13 SHEET META ROOFING,OVERHANG PAST CMU WALL BELOW FTYP.) N a B 5 b ]1Y114'STEEL COLUMN,PAINTEDIB'EMBED,11Px312'SO PLWELD ASA-FROM Q ' L9 SCALE: 4C.Y.DUMPBJER 4GY.DUMPSTER '❑° TDP x SIDE ENCLOSURE ELEVATION 3 m i PROVIDEo6r w PRD DERBY w i m 3l8"=1'-0" OTHERS 0 OTHERS o OILIGRE45E 15 GUTTER WI DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGING AT ADJACENT LANDSCAPE AREA q L CDNTMNER -°, rn - ❑ U T t t 0 2'FASCN a1.5 �e ,z 13 to _ T.O.ENCLOSURE 14 g —ENCLOSURE 6 FRAMING - ��e5 T ] TYEl P. y n LJ LJ� 2— ENREF CMBL 2 A15 SHEET: 8 10 8 5 B Page 600 q1.5 FRONT ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 1 YyF ] y jy- c „••ry loin NRE �ip - P, 4^ `'�^• �T Fj`3• �i�� �a �' l lh 1•S'73', � �ry . ti, �f 5-r .. Nr loon ,.��:� _ *VEBOT,.Ac IMF �l . ./'� `� - sib ,.wy� hti ..A .:A- - - ` - rlRr -]� • � TI: Y��'• �",�. G ti" ': "� -.ia-,. -F. ><.x - Y- - .� .�I. �.. i i. \. _ ,Yr. _ ..r -- ',%•+T a�.rr_.�: c.r - - c`� ,7 ic;'s�'� - •#"�� b ��yyeeP:`'Y ti- '�"! � '+a'►�3� � u�.,�' �- �.t^' .- ,b`� '�°�-r.r• �: ai I j !we-r�a�ars��a�ro ix�arara��nu `` '! '. F.r iWqlf/J�.,�YlYsa9rflltll�lSl'N,rAl i� r'1'iQ�,aiIY Y^hiiQl�iM ' �xr, - 'ttr• '=1 :l +'i i �.�l�;r 6c {`{i��! 1,+� I f' o-ie:rrtir•r' mrrom„rr..r r•xn nm gs•r n ran•ra,m�.l,,. r.r �..it I'i � rF,v ,r. '! 'b. r . :r ]; I ,,.�.�. r !'r� ,'?i r a .r•! .:' i- : Sr .I a I •.� •.rla .-x l�� r r-'.r �k I !• .rrr r _'++ � I• -�, I, ryy . !, y .: - ,/ ... .. f :. . r . ter,�e' .'.(t .. _ , .F. r• .=r:r•�,• r i. ., r e,w , .- .e. r.d'. ,..�.,1 ,�4 SSS16 r.'�.1 1.�' �., i��n� .�`.asA��t3� t'.� ,l l a n i s ! J ,i+ ,�'.� ,�.1� i. v' I: 'fir;. •� T,�.�,. .i ! PRE Id- ' • by . - .�J ' ' _ x t=r 1' �� 'Y' S •� �-� • 5 � ' ' rid;,,F'•.s � � � S i � _ r� r Tom- ' � •1 I� r,. l� f_rr TTT - MW } J 1l..�•r' Ag ION 17 j •-�/ � .,4, �.+�r.-;...�-•..�,,,� . - ram, ': ` .� - . . . . .. ! � ' '+-•': �{' -ram, �''w. V • • 1 1 1 1 z :1 • PLANTING LEGEND TREES SYMBOL TREE NAME OTY. WUCOLS r STREET TREE ALONG 9TH STREET CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA, CAMPHOR TREE 4 M 9TH STREET 24" BOX SIZE. 30'-0" O.C. R.O.W. PROPOSED MONUMENT - ° 4 a- • -0 SIGN PER ARCH. DWGS. STREET TREE ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE PLATANUS RACEMOSA, CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 5 M ° 24" BOX SIZE. 30'-0" O.C. f O , I. d a' 4 a A °d ° a 4 4 4 A BIKE RACK PER QUERCUS VIRGINIAN& SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 6 M ARCH. DWGS. a a. PATIO PER 36 BOX SIZE. STANDARD TRUNK. moo- a ARCH. DWGS. 4 41 a" - ° ° a 4 4 PARKING LOT SHADE TREE TREE �� a a _ ° e P.L. ° e 4 y 4 QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK 5 L - - ° O 24" BOX SIZE. p ° a d ■ a a a v o SECONDARY PARKING LOT TREE 6 L COMMERCIAL • PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR, FERN PINE STORAGE 4 15 GAL. SIZE- _ W EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE AT PROPERTY LINE _ 013 n ° , ■ ° Z . GEIJERA PARVIFLORA, AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 14 M a A�4' 7—ELEVEN ' ° a Li 15 GAL. SIZE. a STORE Q FLOWERING ACCCENT TREE CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM', PALO VERDE 143 36" BOX SIZE. 11 L a +:4 -0' add X co ALTERNATE: LAGERSTROEMIA I. 'NATCHEZ' ° ■ " o _ a d°. 4 ■ d Oco LJ_ SHRUBS - PROPOSED SHRUBS WILL BE SELECTED FROM THE FOLLOWING: oo M g0 a ■ o f SYMBOL SHRUB NAME WUCOLS LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER 'd `a ' a TRANSFORMER 05 GAL. SIZE L EC a aa. PER ARCH. DWGS. ' 4a PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'MONUS', BRIGHT 'N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL L d • ° 15 GAL. SIZE EVERGREEN SCREEN WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY SHRUBS AROUND 5 GAL. SIZE L TRANSFORMER. 5 GALLON d . SIZE MINIMUM �E)13=1 CALL I STEM ON 'LITTLE JOHN', LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH A 5 GAL- SIZE L W a a LAURUS NOBILIS, SWEET BAY ` W w y W w w w - W v W Y W W Y c 15 GAL. SIZE ` W W J LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM', WAXLEAF PRIVET 5 GAL. SIZE M % W W W W w w W w w w w v v n ROSMARINUS 'TUSCAN BLUE', TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY W w y o`er 5 GAL. SIZE L o d DODONAEA VISCOSA, HOPSEED BUSH 15 GAL. SIZE M °ryX� TRASH ENCLOSU GROUND COVER AND SHRUB MASSES PER ARCH. DWG RE SYMBOL GROUND COVER/SHRUB MASS NAME WUCOLS LANTANA 'GOLD RUSH', LANTAN GOLD RUSH 1 GAL. SIZE e@ 24" O.C. L '' w 0 a. SENECIO REPENS, BLUE CHALKSTICKS L — " J 1 GAL SIZE O - ALOE 'BLUE ELF', BLUE ELF ALOE 1 GAL. SIZE P.L. ALOE STRIATA, CORAL ALOE L 1 GAL. SIZE SALVIA'BEE'S BLISS', BEE'S BLISS SAGE L 1 GAL. SIZE SALVIA'ALLEN CHICKERING', ALLEN CHICKERING SAGE GENERAL NOTES: IRRIGATION NOTE: 5 GAL. SIZE L • SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOW FLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', PROSTRATE ROSEMARY GROUND COVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' OF ET WEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOW FLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR 1 GAL. SIZE L MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL. DRIP SYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATION WATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THE CURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATER ORDINANCE. BACCHARIS P- 'TWIN PEAKS', DWARF COYOTE BRUSH ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES 1 GAL. SIZE L CONNECT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. TYP. EROSION CONTROL DROUGHT TOLERANT BANK PLANTING SUCH ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE WUCOLS PLANT FACTOR AS BACCHARIS MIXED WITH ASSORTED GRASSES. M DETECTOR CHECKS AND FIRE CHECK VALVES WILL BE SCREENED WITH THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS' EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCE FINAL LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN y REGION '4-SOUTH INLAND VALLEY'. DETENTION BASIN BOTTOM SHALL RECEIVE A HYDROSEED MIX M DETERMINED. w w CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING. H = HIGH WATER NEEDS M = MODERATE WATER NEEDS • ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM 1.0 LBS/ACRE CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE: L = LOW WATER NEEDS ESCHSCHOLZIA CAESPITOSA 1.0 LBS/ACRE VL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS • JUNCUS BUFONIUS 1.0 LBS/ACRE THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARY • LEYMUS TRITICODIDESRIO 6.0 LBS/ACRE INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLY VERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE. IT IS • DESCHAMSIA DESPITOSA 4.0 LBS/ACRE MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID IN EXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT • FESTUCA RUBRA'MOLATE' 10.0 LBS/ACRE STRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIES INDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AS MORE HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM 6-0 LBS/ACRE RELIABLE INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. • MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 1.0 LBS/ACRE • MUHLENBERGIA MICROSPERMA 3.0 LBS/ACRE • HORDEUM DEPRESSUM 3.0 LBS/ACRE 1 , CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 20' 40' 60� NORTH SCALE: 1 " = W-0" 7- ELEVEN CORNER OF 9TH STREET & ARCHIBALD AVENUE SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. 2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAY �LEv FALLBROOK, CA 92028 RANCHO C U CAM O N GA, CA DATE: 12/09/2020 PH: 760-842-8993 Lml Page 579 Page 671 Page 135 W W W W W W EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS ADJACENT TO EX.TRANSFORMER. W W 5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM P.L. EX.TRANSFORMER Page 698 PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 I 0 i \ \ / APPLICANT (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 o APN 02 CHASE ORBIS EaSTEVAIE,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA Z NG: GENE L IN ST IAL p II \ \ / APN: 0209-041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE v ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 m \ / (949)330-7562 TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 0 -=TEOH N. 25- - HI / UTILITY PROVIDERS w n NINTH STREET EX.SERVICE\ J / I STORM: BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PUBUC WORKS 909 387-7995 PROP.40'DRIVEWAY PER 259' / r BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 909 297-14]0 BUD DWG.101 TYPE C \ ; / CITY OF RANCGO CUCAMONGA 909 477-2]40 SEVER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 98]-2591 EX.PULL BOX TO REMAIN - -C4-- - I \ WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 987-2591 1124.89 TO 11280]TC 1124.89 FS RELOCATE EX.SIGN I REMOVE AND \ ° GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 909 335-7955 E%.FIRE HYDRANT 1124.25 EL 1124.45 FL m 1124.8fi Fs- PROP. S/W REPLACE RAMP ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 909 329-9445 ° TN REMAIN 1125--A - TELEPHONE: AT&T 800 331-0500 EX.TRAFFIC SIGNAL PN: 0209-054-79 CABLE: CHARIER CABLE 909 975-3398 N I EX.R/W n - AND PULL BOX TO / 5 _ - N89'50'01'W 219.46'= REMAIN ; v> m : MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) EX.TREE TO REMAIN 1124.B9 BW.. ��112456 FS •• --.. ... �• 6r N i �/' '.'.1124.61,FS'.'.'..'.N44'0UIUU 2].95' vl, �-1125- EX.LIGHT i0 REMAINS L 1124.69 BW I '�1124.]8'FS ."44 BUILDING; \ PROPOSED RAMP SITE DATA 1124.93 TC '1125.06 TC _ 1124.]4 F5 SETBACK x 1124.26FL '.`. 1124.56 FS ''''''"� '.'.�'.;.�. ; I \ SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE L ?¢m \ / RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 1124.81TC 1124.57T 1124.68F5' o• 1123.]2 . I EX. TRAFFIC SIGN L O um 6 5 11243]FS - 9 �i o ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-0000 _ 1124.07 FS PROPOSED BIKE RACK - AND PULL BOX TO / 1124.74 TC' - REMAIN `n 5 1123.21 TC .N 112424 F5 PROPOSE ', 'y` 3),„(({'''45'BUILD 'PROPOSED THOMAS PROS.COORDINATES. RIVERSIDE 1122.]t FS \jam,, GREASE n\/ .'.1'.).'SETBACK ING 1 I 11 I COUNTIES PAGE 6021NIRD j VERS "o .1123.501P'20• .. .. ......... I / {I I u X _, - INTERCEPTOR Y.......:1 1 MONUMENTS 1 ZONING/LAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ----- / N a oap "o 1123.61T1117.731NV 1124.18 S o 1118821NV { / EX SIDEWALK I,i 3 0l FEMA: FEMA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. ^T 1+�i•1 ''•" •• 1. = I TO REMAIN / �I APN: 0209-054-80 FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA E c� 111].591NV ...... \ - / ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC SUBJECT TO I PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOW EVENT .m 1124.35 FF "" 6 ' / ) LEGEND CONSTRUCTION NOTES w o 5[ I 1124.35 FS... PROP.FIRE WATER L 1122.OFS -'1124.35F5'�'�-'... PROP DOMES PROPERTY LINE O x ^ n- - 605' TIC WATER ---- 1 CONCRETE CURBLi n e I , 11. 1124.35 FF ry PROP.IRRIGATION WAIERI / - CENTER LINE w o _ O2 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER o� --________ z 5.' 28.' 20 30 20' 6' ,„ 56.1', 56' 44.96' O •- ®�i _ t I ----- EASEMENT OR SETBACK LINE 3 3'WIDE VALLEY GUTTER Y 1 I+oi•1 f ... 9 01 I n ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL Oq ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH DETECTABLE - I ice. 1.5. I ' n I - GRADE BREAK WARNINGS 1124.20TC: 1124.35 FF o- ..w I \ 3 O \ \ PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 5 CURB CUT 1123.70FS ]EEE}cN I XX.XX T STORE \� X%.XX FS UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN WITH GRAVEL PAD i 6,000 SF \\ I ty� 111435 EF -- o \ vNi / + XX.XX TC EXISTING SPOT GRADE 7 BIORETENTION BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS o \ 11z3a5 pnn / / XX.X%FS AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE E - ______--___ °y•. 11.oi• 159 .. Div o In DETAIL 1,SHEET 2. PROPOSED PROPOSED FLOW / p ELECTRICAL \ /3 / 1 I 2.00% (DIRECTION AND SLOPE) O B AND OVERFLOW BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS n q METER CABINET1124.26 FS �\/ / I I AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE 5 PARCEARMAP 8653 �z \ I+oi•I 1124.35 FS 6 / °I _ DETAIL 2.SHEET 2. o I I - LANDSCAPE/ m PROPOSED °1124.18 � 4.6. �1121.97 TC)'?tf I PLANTER AREA O9 BIOSWALE 90/21-22 �r 20 TRANSFORMER.. 1124.14'F5 2 1�12149 FL \\\ l j o 10 HEADWALL O E. 112241 TO o �T _ 9 1121 6 1121.85 TC STANDARD DUTY >° ________ B III 1.91FS1+ i+1 1122.]FL \ 11 CATCH BASIN o 0 EX.RIBBON 11 ... � ... 1121 37 FL / CONCRETE PAVEMENT CUTER TO REMAIN '.'.'.'... "' "" "'1119.OTFG / / ° -J Ed 1122.88TC, - EX.PL 1122.38FS .1123.04'FS: : '.1121.05 FS :EX R WTI.. ] N \ 1 APN: 0209-054-82 ° T7T 1i22.8iTP 10 / \ / ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) p` cs _ � ::'S .. . sorc m\/ 3 / I lQ _ ESTIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES �� o - PROPOSED- -� q 1119.56 FL \ I - - _ OIL&WATER PROPOSED ::: 21121.001'C,,,, .� I I CUT: 153 CY SEPARATOR 1120.00 FG.' 1 O AIR&WATER _ ^Y /m T �� a 95"' U FILL 5,457 CY 1T122.37TC 1120 m nQA^° PROP.SEWER FS 1121.42 TC ,l 3 112068 FL 1120�65 TC O `�^\� / NET: 5,304 Cy FILL ` Ui f '" T1113.38INV 1120.92 FL L,\� 8 \ 1120 1120.15 FS 1 Q NOTE:THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING GROUND pµry rl 1109.4]IN TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT GRADES ON m E __ THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON THE >e /w 1121.93 TO 1121.52 TC 11 _ 1120.32 TC° - \ / GRADING PLAN(S). Q w PROPOSED HEALY 1121.43 FL 2 1121.02 TO 1P' 1119.82E Z 1v ERID E : PRO PGEED I' 1121.27 TCI 3 2 EX.FlRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN I ACCOUNTHE RTHFNNCHANGESEIN ABOVE VOLUME REDUER TO BIULKINGPOCLEARING ANDS ONLY, GRUBBING HAW ?SHR NKAGEEEN �ROVERED � _ 0 9 LOT LINE e 112077,FL EXCAVATION AND RE-COMPACTION, N 5 C i FOR THE /^ \��.•..• 1121 1120e� .. '.'.\' 1`PR OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINS,DSLABS,CONSTRUCTION OF E PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW EW •�v I OP.40'DRIVEWAY PER \ PAVEMENTS, ETC, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ESTIMATES FOR BIDDING x ---------- --- N89'49'29"W 236119 S 111955 Tf. --- 1119.5 Tf ••a b T STD.TWO.101 TYPE C I° \ PURPOSES. J a E* ) 111011TC. -7 1119.21 TC \ Iy/ PRoposeD TRasH n18A1T LEGAL DESCRIPTION /L�u �� n$ I/ - ENCLOSURE) I) \` I\\ IT / PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS,PAGE 21 AND yV 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. ^ 9 EX.RIBBON EX.DRIVEWAY / LL _ GUTTER To REMAIN- o BE BENCHMARK PARCEL 1 REMOVE EXISTING -m REMOVED) d S -- - a PARKING WTHIN / I 2'BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB STAMPED"CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10041A 2009"AT THE --- PARCEL MAP 1528 n SHARED ACCESS 1 \ / No CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE 1.0!WESTERLY FROM THE END OF PMB 14/56 Q E%.TRANSFORMER CURB RETURN ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.ELEVATION 1207.70 0 o RE-STRIPE TO E ACCOMMODATE n \ o E APN: 0209-032-34 ADDITIONAL 3 0 EASEMENT NOTES ¢ ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARKING z \ \ / I APN: 0209-054-78 SITE AREA U •\ \ \ / / 3 1, EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND J \ v, ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED TOTAL SITE AREA I.8]ACRES J N APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164,PAGE 144]OF _ EXISTING BUILDING \ \ / / 1 OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA I.7]ACRES U)w °- Q4 2. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES ~o • _-____--_ 4 \ \ I EX.I \ / 80 8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04.1984 ON FILE IN fV U" BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF PARCEL MAPS EXISTING PERVIOUS I.]8 ACRES Z y I 589'S000"E 235.06' PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES ~w E i w8 _ rca ______ - u ------------- \ \�^ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES _� a U REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES Ow LU Q aa� W °o PARCEL 2 z w _-__--- -_-_ PARCEL MAP 1528 ILL a _ EMS 14/56 I \\ \\ I I W a LL 0 0 APN: 0209-032-37 -- -----ll \ \\ / APN: 0209-054-76 NORTH ILL W 3 Z a ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ / } ZONING: MEDIUM(8-t4 DU/AC) t` z io m O co U y GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET E FLOOD ZONE X FLOOD ZONE A\ Nr� 3D 6D $= 1 X / I I SHEET NUMBER ➢ M„ sElr,sx 1 OF 2 a aMir„�,4F 7N:MAS M aW1E VALE CO2,CIA]J-3(200) a s]E i 8 mxxa R W EAL ME—(a DU/x) 1128 112E �EOH EO NMm-/S (N FG 27. r 9 _ I,Exsc noE I p L ... EL-o' 1124 MA 1124 .. EG 1120 I.a�Y muu(e�e w/AC) 113. 9 ax 5.6, 28.5 20' 30' 20' S/W 60.5 S/W 56' S6' A LANDSCAPE DRIVE GAS DRIVE ARKING BUILDING LANDSCAPE HALF-STREET -- AISLE PUMPS AISLE ARCHIBALD BLVD 1118 =ry m x o 1114 1114 O v; E 0.. - 2 11+00 12+00 13+00 L7 »:...... is o a- m, HORIZON o-4�AD SECTION A— GJ w oo fi 9 TAIL SCALE 1"=30" 'z O .......... E2 F VERTICAL SCALE 1"-3' � o HR W o. 28 1128 IS T rfi m i FG z f o D ueszs 2R 2% W p 0 1124 MA% TAX- 1124 _ b' i I EG k s$ _ _ 1120 1120 n� <o F.u./sss" SCAPE S/4.W S/a.W 29 _37 LF-ST'REET H 30 16' DRIVE m u AISLE 19' 35' 111' 53' 23' NI N1H ST ` - TRASH ARKING LANDSCAPE BUILDING PAN O LANDSCAP rc[SECTION M A r 1116 ENCLOSURE 1116 1'-50' 1114 1114 U) z EX.TH Ex' 21+00 22+00 23+00 O SOUERLY NORTHERLY R/W R/W m 5 (66') o F (29•) (32) nD'> n9) 25') n2) SECTION B—B W o$ 2E,.MEM, HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=30" E IXVEMEM DERINC _Ex.CURBVERTICAL SCALE —3PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER IX.CURB 18^TO BIORETEN110N BOTTOM n S k GUTTER k GUTTER ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN \ 3n ADJOINING SIZE STRUCTURES PER PLAN o E PROP,SIDEWALK BASE COURSE o p COMPACTED SUB-GRADE _ 2_4^OF OVERFLOW } 2-4^OF OVERFLOW - MULCH DRAIN ?P MULCH DRAIN NINTH STREET `� �� NOT TO SCALE J 0 6 Ex. EASTERLY f--'11II -I=1 T-i -- N_ W D b WESTERLY ENGINEERED II II II-III I_ ENGINEERED o$ R/W SOIL MEDIA 131I -I_I -II III- SOIL MEDIA Z D. 0 R/W (VARIES 100'-1044) ETlli BE o (60-80,: IJ'I-I -11 III-I (60-8% 0= a (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96•) ASTM C33 -III II ASTM C33 O Q U �� 4 20ND40R -,IIFII I 20N40% �� (VARIES) (VARIES 41.5'-455't) (32') (12.96') COMPOST -1'I-' COMPOST Lu W Q PER WOMP - PER WOMP Z Q~Z W 65A,RI�t) 5' REPORT) REPORT) W W H U F Q y 3 IXISi.AC c'i < U ¢N r° i 5 PAVEMEM Ex.MFANDERINO V• `"°V` � W A W 0 O J= Ex.SIDEWO�K IX.CURB IX.CURB EX.MEAN J J pa 3 Q E CURER k GUTTER 6 PERFORATED 6 PERFORATED W W 3 Z U rMZO 5 WRAP EN D30 MIL PVC PVC PIPE WRAP EN 30E MIL VC PVC PIPE - BASE COURSE NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHT0 R57 NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO N5] T ro O $$ COMPACTED SUB GRADE GRAVEL GRAVEL co N U 3'THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"THICK LAYER OF PE ARCHIBALD AVENUE cRAVEL GRAVEL page 686 NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER DETAIL-1 DETAIL-2 2�F 2 a€ p811YnnA N.T.S. N.T.S. : BMP INSPECEON/MAINTENANCFACENIR6 LEGEND c RFSPONSIBIE PARTYIS) REQUIRED MINIMUM FREQUENCY Of ACIIVIflFS EOH EO — -1125� _ \ EOH`-�: OWNER WILL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/HERSELF I \ V RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINE a EDUCATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS,TENANTS, WITH THE EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS PROVIDED NINTH STREET AND OCCUPANTS ON STORMWATER BURNS OWNER \ ;� - CENTERLINE = YEARLY / ° (BMP NI) WTHINTHISWOMPAND EDUCFTETENANTS _ _ - _ _ - a AND EMPLOYEES. / DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY GARDENING AND LAWN CARE PRACTIICESTO _———1125 IANDSFAPE MANAGEMENT IBMP NB) OWNER PREVENT LANDSCAPE WATER FROM EXITING WEEKLY _ \ \ / -—-(147)-—-EXISTING CONTOURS THE PROJECT SITE. 147 PROPOSED CONTOURS HAZARDOUS WASTES AS DEFINED BYTTLE 22 _ ............ TIE 22 OCR COMPLIANCE IBMP NE) OWNER CCR WILL BE MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONGOING 'S "� .r EH. .:...:.' \ \/ / —�—F—F_£_FLOW LINE n THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH 23":: .. z DEPARTMENT. PROP.BIOSWALE STESPECIFIC SPILLCOMINGENCl PLAN SHALL o I\ \ O T BMP.", - I SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN \ \ / S SPILLCONTINGENCYPIANIBMPN7) OWNER BEMADEAVAIIABI£FORTENANTSAND ONGOING \ S4,SS E'T - \ III EMPLOYEES. 50 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN \r OWNERSTGABIDE BYTIESiATE,COUNtt, \_ 1122 _ o o` J'•' 2 I \ \ Z r UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK COMPLIANCE AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH \ BMP N3, \ ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN OWNER ONGOING f III (BMP NS) DEPARTMENT ANDLOCALLDR. la6,.1 54,SSL 2 REGULATIONS. BMP NIT N15 . J ' \ / $ HAZARDOUS MATERIAI$DISCLOSURE OWNERS TO ABIDE BY RESPECTIVE FIRE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN COMPUANCE(BMP N9) OWNER PROTECDONAGENCYREGULATONSfORTHE ONGOING % MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. PROP.BIOSWALE \ / 1.6 p \ / D EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE e UNIFORM FIRE CODE IMPLEMENTATION(BMP fi N.) OWNER COMPLY WITH CAUFORNIA FIRE CODE. ONGOING la 1 rO / m -' BMP S12 8 'PROPOSED - / \ \\ J OD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DMA 17 ELEVEN : I \ C LIMB SHALL BE PICKED UP TRASH ENCLOSURE \ 64 BUILDING EX.R/W 1 \ \\ m / °gym oy LITTER/DEBAISCONTROLPROGRAM(BMP Nll) OWNER AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT AND CLEANED, WEEKLY \\2 B,60O$F. I \ \ / r'1 J •^�'► DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW L z m ®E.. 2 r DUMPSIERG SHALL BE EMPTIED. �l PROP.BIOREIENTION.�-�::�:.: � o_fi MIH UNDERDRAI IL ii:: I�oT. E PER BIO-I DETAIL:: ::::�: _ ENSURE TENANTSARE FAMILIARWIM ONSIIE LAT:34.094954'�: \ / DMA ID - BMPS AND ASSOCIATED MAINTENANCE 7 Jr .I DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA LABEL BE REQUI RED.OWNER WILL CHECK WITH CITY I,ao,. / LONG:-117.593]88': 2 \ \ Q / ACRES Oho o AND COUNTY AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO OBTAIN NEW/UPDATED EDUCATION 11120 o EMPLOYEE TRAINING IBMP N12) OWNER MATERIALEANDPROADETHESEMATERIALS YEARLY 5 \ Fe TOTENANTS.EMPLOYEES SHALL BE MINED eovl .RMP.:N 4 i��F TOCLEAN UPSPILLS AND PARTQPATE IN _ 9 L \ G`+ ONGOING MAINTENANCE,THE WQMP E%.R \ \ / J I LANDSCAPED AREA > E^ REQUIRES ANNUAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND \ ofi TMINING FOR NEW HIRES WITHIN 2 MONTHS. / I 1/ 9 � LAT 34.095131' '� BMP NI4, NI INSPECT,CLEAN AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE PRIOR TO RAINY SIMON ANDAFTER EVERY LONG:-117.594241'0 O 1122 . CATCH BASIN INSPECTION BMP NI4I OWNER fACILITIES. PAIN EVENTGREATERTHAN 0.5INCHES. 1120. KEY NOTES Y VACUUM SWEEPING OF PRIME STREETS AND PARKING LOTS ANO PPIVATESTREETSMUSTBE QUARTERLY(MINIMUM),WEEKLY DURING - - , / 4 MA- \ ' / O1 PROPOSED CURB CUT n _i PARKING LOTS BMP NUS) OWNER SWEPT. RAINY SEASON(OCT-MAY) - BMP NET L/J 0.1 ' PR S4 N3' O2 PROPOSED UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN -J PRO P.R 54,S5 \ \ - STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILING AND MAINTAIN LEGIBILITY OF STENCIUNG AND PROPOSED OVERFLOW RISER STRICTURE fi SIGNAGE(OMP ELI OWNER SIGNS. MIRY. \ / RAS PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ° io N TH AND WASTE STORAGE AREAS MUST BE \ / / 5 1 f INSPECTED TO ENSURE RECEPTACLES ARE NOT PROP.BIOREIENTON - �� 4 \ \ PROPOSED GRAVEL PAD pwp O 0 o COLLECTING STORM WATER.TR45H MiH UNDERDRAINS _ 3 BMP NI4,51� \ \ / / 6 PROPOSED FUEUNG AREA(DRAINAGE i0 BE DIRECTED - TRASHANDWASTESTORAGEAREA(BMPSB) OWNER WEEKLY - - -- \ \ I TO OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE BMP) ENCLOSURE AREAS SHALL BE SWEPTAND PER BIO-2 DETAIL \\ \ CLEANED,GUMPSTERS SHALL BE EMPTED.LIDS LAT:34.094748' E%.DRAINAGE V-GUiIER \ \J / MUST BE MAINTAINED CLOSED WALL TIMES. LONG:-11 J.593912' ` \ \1 / �I ] PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TANKS IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE INSPECTED TO I \ ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONALItt.DREGS / �B PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE ti$ EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS&LANDSCAPE MUSTBEINSPECTEDTOAVOID 9 PROPOSED OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR a DESIGN(BRAD 54) OWNER OVERWAIERING AND WATER C'YCLCAND WEEKLY DISCHARGE POINT 12 _ O p p DUIIATIONSHALLBEADIUSIEOSEASONALLVBV EXISTING 10 PROPOSED HEADWALL p E f LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR. BUILDING TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE 11 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN m LANDSCAPE AREAS 14INCHES BELOW CURB, REMOVED WITHIN THE Sl INCH DEPRESSION E%.R I \ - ND D OF PER ,O SIDEWAII(OR PAVEMENT BMP EST AREMOVEDEWEQUIR THE BIOSWALE AND N V o 12 CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN OWNER WEEKLY \\ ° REQUIREMENTS / VARIES {, TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE �� iQ BIOSWAIES IBMP N4) OWNER DISPOSED OF PER LOCALIUAISDICTION WEEKLY REQUIREMENTS.INSPECT FOR SIGNS Of E%.CB- E ROGIONORDAMAGETOVEGETATION. ° TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE --- Q °= OFFER FFERI WITHIN THE ICTIONN AND EQUIRE ENTS, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIRED BIOPETENTION BASIN IBMPN41 OWNER OF PERLOFALIGNSOF EON REQUIREMENTS. AFTER EVERYRAIN OSSHALL OCCUR MONTHLY $ INCHES INSPECTIONSPERFORMANCE. ANCE. Y INSPECT FOR SIGNS OF EROSION OR DAMAGE 'a P TO ENSURE OPTIMUM PEPWRMANLE. a mvEGETAnoN. _ � BIO SWALE DETAIL Q o$ FU EL DISPENSING AREAS WILL EMEND \ N.T.S. N LL 6.5 FEET(2.0 METERS)FROM THE — 03 CORNER OF EACH FUEL DISPENSER,OR �—_ ____ EX.78" Q sY THE LENGTH AT WHICH THEHOSEAND Q _> NOZZLE ASSEMBLY MAY BE OPERATED PLUS I FOOT IDS M ETER),WHICHEVER 15 PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER E° 18'TO BIORETENTION BOTTOM $ LESS.THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA WILL BE PAVED WITH PORTIAND CEMENT ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN Q - CONCRETE(OR EQUIVALENT SMOOTH ADJOINING SIZE STRUCTURES PER PLAN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE).THE FUEL W 2 DISPENSING AREA WILL HAVE AN 2. APPROPRIATE SLOPE(2 PERCENT-4 _ 2-4`OF OVERFLOW P} 2-4"OF OVERFLOW ,A _ °E - MULCH DRAIN `! MULCH DRAIN PERCENT)TO PREVENTPONDING AND a - WILLBESEPARATEDFROMTHERESTOF THE SITE BY A GRADE BREAK THAT m j PREVENTSRUN-ONOFSTORMWATER.AN �= OVER HANGING ROOF STRUCTURE OR EIILEILEe=ILF-ly� y-IF U CANOPY WILL BE PROVIDED.THE COVER'S ENGINEERED II II-II II II II II II II II ENGINEERED I'III_II II it J ° SOIL MEDIA SOIL MEDIA REEFED l- J y MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE AREA OF THE A 09,STM 3 C33 A 3 FUEL DISPE III II II (60-80 U)W RAND STM CNSING AREA IN THE FIRST E 3 3 31 I I a SAND, SAND, iI N o$ ITEM ABOVE.THECOVERWILLNOT 20-40Y, II III II II II III-III-II-II II 20-40R II Wye DRAIN ONTO THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA COMPOST 3113 COMPOST IEIII AND THE DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE ROUTED PER WOMP PER WORO K j Q E TO PREVENT DRAINAGE ACROSS THE REPORT) REPORT) O U K U h FU ELING AREA.THE FUELING AREA WILL a0 a 2 DRAIN TO THE PROJECTS TREATMENT n jk W W DC U o a FUEUNG ARE0.5(S12) OWNER CONTROL BMP(5). ED ONGOING 6"PERFORATED 6"PERFORAIEO W d a W ED ED e WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM PVC PIPE WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM PVC PIPE W U IN 30 MIL PVC IN 30 MIL PVC > to NON-PERMEABLE UNER AASNTO-7 NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO/57 W a W K 0 o GRAVEL GRAVEL J Q Ua W a 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA NORTH W W 3 Z O 3.S GRAVEL GRAVEL Z U n A, O 6g N.T.S. 3I0-2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET O N.T.S. N.T.S. pary�p 40 80 o � $➢ �� r l�.Cr SHEET NUMBER aM,Na,.4 1 PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOU1H,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 -021-1 CHASE ORRIS EaS1EVALL,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA ° ZO G: IN AL INDU T IAL O II \ \ / �° APN: 0209=041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS ° `\ +MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 R879 AIRPORT DRIVE a ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 z (949)330-7562 TO OGRA0PHY 19 PROVIDED ON o AEON EON H \E 125- _ HI / EOH-F-\EOH NINTH STREET \ \ SITED T \ / I SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE \ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 \ --�-- - - - I / ° ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-ONO(E)SIGN LIZED \ - o4I _______ NTEIA$E TI N / r \ THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES: 2009 SAN BERNARDIN0&RIVERSIDE 1_-� ----�1125�������� \ \ COUNTIES PAGE 602 GRID J-3 APN: 0289\054-79 ° 8 _ - '0 \ ELA 0'/ / I ZONINGAAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \VI / h m ZONING: MEDIUM =t4 f1t/AC) --- _ 11 4) \ ^J� i I \ FEMA: LUCA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. -11 Z`J' r b9 •+1.08 •+24 •+1.17 1.4 •+1.42 •+1.15 •+0. •-0.12 0. o FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA w l 1 f ___ / SUBJECT TO 1 PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOOD EVENT V \\`-- - LEGEND- L =Q< 5g + •63`� PROPERTY UNE O k w m +3 •+I. •+1. 1.35 •+1.66�,\1.18 •+.]5 •+0.15 •-.0 I \ �+ "g \ CENTER LINE "o I / \\ 1 \ I 1 -77 LIMITS OF DISNRBANCE s -------- +\3 \p+1 _- 53,`+1.6 •at163 n2ID91.I4 •+.4 +Y.B311 •+0. I 1 \\\ \1� / 1 � PROPOSED FILL ^ ? 1 / \ \ 'V of I �.17 PROPOSE CUT 1 II••�•I �� I \ \ �I I ° PN: 0209-054-8 ^ _ \ I \ \ I MEDIUM(8-14 U AC) 3 •+1i 6 11165 •+1 I .;II9 s3 a35_+.v _1.86 •+Lo I ESTIMATE EARTWORK QUANTITIES Ih�•II - \ \ \ / / \ -e -- _--- CUT: 5,4 7 o z i I FILL: 5,457 CY 09 1•+11 2 l 70 •+2 02 2l •+316 3.03 +.93 +2.49\ •+1.4 \ \ / / 1 I •- ®�n _ J-¢EVEN SigEE � NET: 5,304 CY FlLL Y 1 lao•I \ 6.000 Sf \ ,I/ / 01 I n I �� NOTE: THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING 1 �' � I I \ \ / I GROUND TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT +.51 +1 8 2 O6 •� 9 •+3.54 •+3.43 .35 •+2.75 •,1 6 I ` \ / I o OR ON THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON \ la THE GRADING PLAN(S). ' \ I - � I \ I 5 THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ABOVE ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY THEY HAVE NOT BEEN FACTORED TO ACCOUNT- +.`Jb •+3.]9 •+3.69 +.60 f \ \ / / EXCAVATION OUANOCRE OVER- NCOMPACTIONGES IN LAND CONSTRUCTION UME DUE TO KMETHODS.NOR DO THEY ING, CLEARING AND RCCOUNT FOR THEGEHICKNE55 - o ------- 5�o.d '+2.]2 '+ 'I11 \ / / ^�� OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINGS, SLABS, REUSE OF PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW PAVEMENTS, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ES11MAlE5 FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. - PARCEL 1 I I \ / 1 4 / � o 5 .44 14.0-.2 •+294 .3 •+4,05 •+199 •+2. +1 I I I _ k PARCEL MAP 8653 't + o s PMB 90/21-22 z n2a )v ij SITE AREA Y123122 \ Q 1 / ° TOTAL SITE AREA 1.87 ACRES O o wo J u •1. 2111M \ \ ,\ TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.77 ACRES 2 16 u m °a -______ 99 .+ . 291 (��i 3. +3J4 ��x EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES E m dye � \ 1 I n eN: 0209-054- EXISTING PERVIOUS 1.78 ACRES 7 •+2.98 •+2.87 •+2 57 -0.85,•-1.15 ` \ \\S/ / I j ZONING: APEDIUM(8-14 D/AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES Q o _ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES rc y �� 1ieU 4) / -1120 37 •+2.68 •+164 •+2.50 1.58 •+1.1 � ] \ U`\ / I I \ P + + 86 +2 1 •2.1 \`•t0.88 •+0.32 •+0.1 0 \ 1 \ W o. LJL ----------------------- _ PARCEL 1 n PARCEL MAP 1528 \ \ / 0 - PMB 14/561111111111111TTTT7_711111111111 APN: 0209-032-34 ° -ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ \ / / o AP 0209-05 o \\ \ / / II ZONING: MEDIUM(8 4 DU%A�), $ N os N w o� __ i- \ m z I Zym j Q zo _ -- \\ \\ j / I �W wU PARCEL 2 \ \ / / I Z of H z w 'T \ I PARCEL MAP 1528 \ 4 �� sxz. _ W L¢(0 U z`" --'-- PMB 14/56 � I\ `\ \\ / II I W a W a o APN: 0209-032-37 I \ `1 I I I APN: 209-054-7 NORTH W W 3 Z 0 3= ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \I \\ / + M IUM(8-14 U/AC) Do t` Z 1 I xnwrw U. 0 y$ -1115- PaGRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 N MwnYAR SHEET NUMBER mo - SEI IYC IQ vs,ft1N aWMtwnµiy INCWAsm=EAAXW?,GWJ-d(,W) r -AT B1 52E ---- IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA WE UTTIZATION MAP FOR TENT TO CE PARCEL MAP NO. 2 164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS • • n600 .. . -• IAx aun'�L - -- - e ••OLL,fna E } T '• }• f OWNER I e MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T.MANDEVILLE A w 500 LINDA VISTA AVENUE .. �,-� 4. • � PASADENA,CA 91105 �•Jr"� •" •! '` Lrrrrn wv APPLICANT S[I/4.SfG Ia 7.IS,ftilF CHASE ORBIS EASTEVAIE,LLC 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 ••�tl �•r•..�-/ .� 1 • ._ �I ➢NYmsmm CLWEVA47602,Md-J(2009) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 -� •, .JI PH.949-330-]562 __ •• w MAP PREPARER ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1- - -01� KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES LAND USE:GENERAL ,- - ZONING:GENERAL INDUSiRIALi ZONING:MEDIUM 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 INDUSTRIAL 0.50-0.60 FAR ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL II LEGEND ORANGE,CA 92868 ( ) LAND USE:GENERAL LAND USE:SCHOOLS(FAR 0.10-020) BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 RIGHT-OF-WAY (714) LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0,50-0.60 FAR) INDUSTRIAL 0.50-0.60 FAR �. [ 786-6275 e' Q' �I p PROPERTY LINE SITE ADDRESS R/w — I�j.• \ 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE CENTER LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 /NTH STREE �D EXISTING STORM DRAIN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS ' _ 9 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 0209-032-35-0000 RAW I' a/r; - ZONING:MEDIUM ZONING/LAND USE t LAND USE:MEDIUM FAR 14.0 DU/AC) ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL R ABBREVIATIONS LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL }+ } IT ADJACENT LAND USE � 3 AC ACRES NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ~ l PROP. : - - ARM ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER SOUTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL M' PROJECT SIZE ZONING:MEDIUM EAST:MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) PARCEL 1 I LAND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) R WEST:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CENTER LINE 68 AC Du Dwfiuwc UNITS UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BUILDING E%. EXISTING SEWER:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAVALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6 600 S.F. GAS:SOUTHERN CAAUFNIA COMPANY PARCEL MAP 8653 R FAR FLOOR AREA RATIO ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CAMFORNIA EDISON PMB 90 21-22 PARCEL MAP 8653 I i TELEPHONE:�•1 R PROPERTY LINE CABLE:CHARTER CABLE 90/21-22 I SCHOOL:CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT PROP. PROPOSED zorvwc:GENERAL EASEMENT NOTES ¢� R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 1, EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE UNES AND PARCEL MAP 1528 PROP.BIOREIENTION BASIN INS : - - INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT PMB 14/56 W11H UNDERDRAINS ZONING:MEDIUM SD STORM DRAIN RECORDED JAGE 481],1885 IN BOOK 39 AND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PROP.RISER 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL MPG: 0209-032-34 P.,.�.P PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED PROP.BIOREIEN ROM BASIN ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL Til DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE WITH DROP IN t; LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) C.AIl1 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SE ENT OR UND CONSULTS PROP.R i_�• I 3 NACIDENTALFPURPOSE S IN THE AND THE DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 26.1977 AS BOOK 9164, PAGE 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. R 4. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP NO.8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04,1984 l ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF \ � •I A� - - 3 PARCEL MAPS ISTING BUILDING EX.CATCH ZONING:MEDIUM PROJEOT NOTES • •_ - - (TO BASIN LAND u5E MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) q iHOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN REMAIN - BERNARDINO k RIVERSIDE COUNTIES(PAGE 602 GRID 1-3). EX.CATCH 2. FEMA FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE X AND EX.CATCH BASIN ZONE A.COMMUNITY PANEL N0, BASIN' O60]1C8830J. EX.CATCH R 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS BASIN TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS:2 APN:0209-032-26 - - TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:2.3292 ACRES ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL I ZONING:MEDIUM 4, TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS AND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP 1528 I LAND USE:ME01111,1(FAR S0-14.0 DU/AC) LEGAL DESORPTION (0.50-0.60 FAR) PMB 14/56 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO,8653 AS PER y EA.CATCH /,' J' PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, APN:0209-032-37 I BASIN -- �Lw� _ PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ZONING: MERAL INDUSTRIAL E%.CATCH - E%.CATCH RECORDS. INDUSTRIAL LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) BASIN] BASIN SITE UTILIZATION MAP L PREPARATION DATE • R/W _ ——— NORTH 12/10/2020 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET N BOULEVARD I10 30 660 120 \ 3 R/W \ a \ \ APNPARULL:0209-032-36 E%.CATCH BASIN ZONING:GNERAL INDUSTRIAL _ WEN PRINTED AT Nu SIZE - - LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) (24 RY.w ZONING:VERY LOW ZONING:C4JERAL INDUSTRIAL E%.CATCH LAND USE:VERY LOW SCALE: '-W Kimley»>Horn SITS I MAP W.D. 94�' CCO LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) BASIN DATE: O6/2020 SHEET '. '� FAR 20-4.0 DU AC DESIGNED: %0 : S4 OF I 6xEET5 CHECKED 766 THE CITY DRIVE.SUITE NO.ORANGE.CA 92868 PlN CK REF: PHONE:711.11DnD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NO' REVISIONS I DATE I BY I FE. WWY.KIMLEY-H 11— Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LMF Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts Part Number ® 6 CPY-FLAT-C SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ ® 28 CPY-FLAT-C-WH SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ Z+ 1 XSPLG-4ME-2 2 @ 900 1.000 23600 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N 6 XSPLG-4ME-B SINGLE 1.000 17200 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N w/XA-SP2BLS ®> 6 XSPW WALL MOUNT 1.000 4270 31 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ Calculation Summary; 1.00 LLF Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min All Calc Points Fc 1.93 16.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. Canopy Fc 21.20 24 14 1.51 1.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .l 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Paved Parking Fc 4.24 16.5 1.0 4.24 16.50 o.z o.z o.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN 0.0 0.1 l 0.1 0.2 0.2 3.- 0. 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.� 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 3 0.3 0.2� 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POLES MOUNTED ON & BASE e°"° ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED: 0.1 o.i1 .2 0. 0.2 0 0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o (7) SSS-4-11-17-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ (17' x 4" x 0.125" STEEL SQUARE POLE, TENON MOUNT) LG-4ME-B MH:20 (6) PD-1 H4BZ SINGLE HORIZONTAL TENON 1 @90° 0.1 0.1 ).2 0.4 1.1 2.8 5.8 7.9 7.4 .3 9 2.8 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.8 1 17 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (1) PD-2H4(90)BZ DOUBLE HORIZONTAL TENON 2@90° (6) XA-SP2BLS BACKLIGHT SHIELD W �p 0.1 0.11 .2 0. 1.1 2.7 6.4 5.9 .3 6.5� .2 3 3 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.•7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.4 2.2 3.5 4.7 L 8 4.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROPOSED POES MEET 120MPH SUSTAINED WIND LOADS ® 159 1 -- 0.1 0.1 .2 0.E 1.1 2.8 3.7 .1 3.5 O3 4�• 5. 1 11.1 12.0 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12X.�11-' " 12.1 12.2 12.1 12.2 12.2 11.8 10.5 6.7 3.7 3.2 6 9 6.2 5.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *** CUSTOMER TO VERIFY ORDERING INFORMATION*AND CATALOGUE NUMBER PRIOR TO PLACING ORDER 1JP 18�20R21 21 1A 2�1 2* 21 21®21 p21 1 21 A 21 21M 21 21 Ill 21 K 21 21M 21p 21®21 21 11 20 lip 1 I O G�� o 0.1 0.1 .2 0. O 13 13 13 13 11 11 ® 11.7 5.4 4.1 5L7 9 .3 0.1 (S.0 ( .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ® 16 6CO(32 23 23 240f9024 24 23 28F O23 23 ( fOC1 3 23 23 2 �6 23 23 23 F,0I 3 23 23 230ff020 1 LJ I FEY ��LUJ LUG LJ LJ IJ ��LUJ �U 9 1 O 16 20 22 23 23 24 24 23 23 23 23 23 3-23 23 2 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 20 1 MH:20 0.1 0.11 .2 0.9 1� 1. 2.1 2.7 .7J .2 .8 6. ® ® ® � ® ® � ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 12.0 5.9 4.6 6.6 9.6 5.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 18�0 21 21 21 Z=' 20 20 20 2=0 0 20 20 d(T 20 20 20 20 Ld 20 20 20 2=0 20 20 20 �3 17 1 0.1 0.1 .2 1.9 2.6 2.7 R'.4 3.9 3.9 .2 4.8 6. 10.2 13.2 13.0 12.0 11.5 11.3 1 .2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 2 11.0 10.1 7.4 6.2 6.4 9.7 8.1 9 •5.8 11004 70'1 8 0 3 0.0 ( 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3.3 5.0 6.0 5.9 5.2 5.0 6.6 6.5 8.5 8.7 10.0 9.4 5.9 4.3 3.7 3.5 3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 5.6 9.9 9L1 9.2 3.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 04 0 0 0.0 0.0 10 ' 9 ' 9 ' 9 12 ' 10 ' 0.1 0.2 .5 4.5 6.6 7.9 4.4 5.3 9.0 12.1 123 14.2 7 9 2.5 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 .3 2.2 3.1 4.1 7,13 6.4 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 .46 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 .7 5. 3 5.1 6.0 11.0 11.6 14.2 6.5�12.3 6 8 4.0 .2 1.3 1.0 l.N 1.1 1.2 1. 1 2 1.2 3- 1 N�4 2.8 3. 5 20 EBl.l 0.4 0.1 0.0 �7p_ y.v 0.0 0.0 0.0 XS G-4 -B _ S V MH:20 _ Q / O 0.1 0.2 3.6 5.0 8.0 4.6 5.7 10.8 10.6 JL2 4 1�.I Nl .8 6 5 3.8 .1 1.1 1.0 1.9 3.2 3. 3. 3 7 3.5 .5 2.1 k.7 2. 3. 7 4 4.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0 0 0.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 � N o N o 0 0 0 0 � 0.1 0.2 0.3 5.6 .-6., ;4• 5.3 4.3 6. 8.2 10.0 9.7 -10.6 5.3 3.8 2.3 0 1.0 1.3 5. 05 1 01.6 0 2.0 3.80 5.2 05.4 5.2 - 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 r0.0 d.0 0.0 0.0 . �_ FYI C m 0.1 0.2 1052 _ 3.5 a, 6, 4.8 3.8 8 8.0 6.5 5.7 4.2 - CPY-FLAT-C 0.7 1.3 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •e MH:12 M 0.1 )0. 2 0.3 3.7 6.2 -5.7 5.5 0 3.0 F 4.8 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. (�.0 0.0 0.0 3 � 19 ' 4 ' ,. 8 ' 111 . 2 / 12 1 �34 . 4 ' 22 . 6 ' 0.1 0.2 0.4 3.4 6.2 7 9 4.5 2.8 2.0 1 4 1.4 1.5 2.9 4.7 1. 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 61 y j XSPW Q 1 m 0.1 0.2 0.6 4.5� 8.3 6.5 .5 .8 2 2 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 2.7 4.2 Mid:11 O 0 O m 2.0 1.3oO o 0 0.2 0 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 Xs -4ME-B C XSPW /� MH:11 0.2 0.5 3.9 8 4 7.2 4.3 3.0 4 1.0 0.7 �0.9 2. 2 TI m 7 3.2 1.�3 0. 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 3 6 7.4 5.4 3.3 .4 l.� 1.1 0.9 00.9 2.1 3.3 XSPW 3.4 1.50 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.0 o2 5 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .P 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 / MH:11 KD�1 .� �� 5 .9 .� - 1.0 .-9 3 4 �D3:0 33. 7 T 9 7� � �1 1.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.2 3.9 4.6 3.9 3.7 3 H 3.7 2.2 1.1 1.6 2983.1 2.7 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 3.2 2.9 2.8 .9 , 2.7 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � � BOM : Complete Part Description 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.4 3.1 6.9 6.1 5.5 6 x7H .4 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.W 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.3 0 rl�. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 QO U' (' 28 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ 01�v�- -P--1 - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.1n n5+9 8.2 7.6 6. 5.6 2.3 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7' 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 O.Q O.O .b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 iJ d V 06 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.8 6.0 5.2 SP5GYWE-B4. 5.6 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. __0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 XSPLG D-HT-4ME-24L-57K-UL-BZ-N 0.0 0.0 0.1 0v1 0.2 - 0.6 ' •°�°o.s 0.2 Wo.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 07 SSS-4-11 -17-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ 06 PD-1 H4(90)BZ \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0. 0.3 0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 �0 - .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 PD-2H4(90)BZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.07 0 �.l 0.1 �0.2 . 0.1 0.1 0.1 A00 R Co H-01 B A L -ODO-0 O A� VOEO'N oU 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 06 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� .0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40 Mo �H0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.i; O.ii 0 0.0 0.0 O.ii 0 06 XA-SP2BLS 0.0 .0 0. 0..0 0 -0 �� -�0 0.-�- 0.� -0.0---0.0 - �� 0 0.� fr 00 0-0 - 8 0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q n - r, n n n n n r, n n n n n n n n n 9 n n n n Illumination results shown on this lighting design CREE12.�.& are Ligd ingus d i parameters provided to in - - - yout By: " ' LIGHTING Crepr edu useddctunctionwithatoryaire Project Name : 7- Eleven #1046125 Archibald + 9th Rancho Cucamonga, CA E scale 1 = 20 test procedures conducted under laboratory �o I I i n W i t h e row conditions. Actual project conditions differing - from these design parameters may affect field COMPANY OF IDEAL INDUSTRIES INC. results.The customer is responsible for A O AO O0 verifyingdimensionalaccuracyalongwith SR-42253 Footcandles calculated at grade Filename: 71 1 -20061 1 RCCACW.AG Date:6/11/2020 4 O 9201 Washington Ave,Racine,W 1 53406 https://creelighting.com-(800)236-6800 compliance with any applicable electrical, lighting,or energy code. Page 586 Page 678 Page 142 —�EOH EOH 9TH STREET — — o X EXISTING Fj I I Lu I V) W EXISTING POWER POLE (TYP) EXISTING R/W J_ I I � I =1 0 PROJECT SITE I Q W z W_ z I 1--EXISTING OVERHEAD w m I UTILITY (TYP) > O a � m z_ 0I I (n W NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 160 Kimley*Horn Page 587 Page 679 Page 143 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATWE PARCEL MAP NO® 20164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS APN:0209-021-17 APN:0209-021-16 I \ \ I ♦ NEwwI ZONING:INDUSTRIAL ZONING:INDUSTRIAL II I \ \ I \ APN:0209-041-01 eI4� ZONING:MEDIUM NINTH STREET I \\ v OWNER IC N89W'00"W n R /`1� IN 500 UNDA META AVENU E.MANOEVILLE ——1125 PASADENA,CA 91105 APN:0209-054-79 -- " S8s'S0'00'E 2t9.47' //ZS \ \I j / ZONING:MEDIUMS APPLICANT SEI I SfC Iq T.IS,ft7W CHASE ORRIS EASTEVALE,LLC Ex-R/Y/ 208 NEWPORAT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 544tl8'304E 27.95' / INOVAS&i0S ddx PACT 601, J-J(xtl9) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 1 T \ 1 PH.949-330-7562 p3- I I vv iv1 MAP PREPARER KINNEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 ORANGE,CA 92868 'III✓/ ` 1 \ / I BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 1122, I APN:0209-054-80 PARCEL 1 _ \` / b14)7a6-627s ZONING:MEDIUM I 1.68 AC - W i /�v 1 TOPOGRAPHY 1 ` `.� I / I ADKAN ENGINEERS 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE Ex. RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 PROPOSED / / Ex' NORMERLY TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 8U ING ,I / SOUTHERLY " I Q\ R/w R/W SITE ADDRESS VARIES 44.96'1 8678(29') (37') RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AVENUEBALD AMON ACA 917M V II v / 11 (I. 1D') (Iv') (25') _ (12') ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS PARCEL 1 020s-032-35-0000 PARCEL MAP 8653 n I \` m I S 1 \ o E%IST.AC 1 ZONING/LAND USE PMB 90/21-22 a \ ° '\ "� PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ——1120-— z 3 \ w1 /1\, EX.CURB &GCUIUIRRB SIDEWALK LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ &G ER P EX.R PARCEL MAPS65S - \\ \ / 1 \ ADJACENT LAND USE / 1 APN:0209-054-82 �\F� \'S NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL i PMB 90/21-22 \\-R/W \ \\ \P / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM 845E COURSE �COMpgC1ED SUB-GRADE SO UTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ \ \ WEST:GENERAEA T.MEDIUM L a-14 INDUSTRIALLc) ZONING:INDUSTRIAL \ / 1 NINTH STREET NOT TO SCALE UTILITY PURVEYORS li \ / /(,1 WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT �\ \ / /'I EN Ex. SEWER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ '' / WESTERLY EASTERLY GAS:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY yV���I R/W ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON -- PROP.It J / I R/W (VARIES 100'-104'2) TELEPHONE:AT&T o N89'49'29'W 236.18' - / (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96'J CABLE:CHARTER CABLE SCHOOL:CHARTER CUCAMONGACAB SCHOOL DISTRICT -_` (VARIES) (VARIES 4L5'-45.5'E) (32') (1296') EASEMENT NOTES PARCEL 2 1 3 U / / 1� (VARIES 1. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND n -------3 5 RECORDEDINCIDENTAL JANUARyES,N eas NOBOOKN 39 PARCELI -0.65 AC o 6.5'-]4 E%IST.AC 1 ryy' w Q � I I OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PARCELMAP 1528--- rn / PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL EM.SIDEW Ex.CURB SIDEWALK PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED E%.CURB PMB 14/56 0 \ / &CUTER &GUHR DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE \m 144E E OFFICIAL DERGROU APN:0209-032-34 �3 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND ZONING:INDUSTRIAL �/ / APN:0209-054-78 \BASE COURSE INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT EXISTING I COMPACTED SUB-GRADE RECORDED APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164, BUILDING I/ / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM ------ z (TO REMAIN) PAGE 144E of OFFICIAL D RECORDS. Ex.R z I\ / I ARCH NOT TO AVENUE EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL \ / NOi i0 SCALE MAP N0.8653 RECORDED OCTOBED 04,1984 1 I 4 1 1 I I \ 1 / ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF --- N89'S0'00'W 235.06'------' r \ \ / II PARCEL MAPS PARCEL 2 I 1 \ \\ / jll` PROJECT NOTES PARCEL MAP 1528 \\ \\ I 11 1. THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN - PMB 14/56 _ /!\ \ \4 / 1 BERNARDINO&RIVERSIDE COUNTED(PAGE _--- ---_--------------- 602 GRID J-3. APN:0209-032-37 \\ \\ I 2. FEN FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL N0. ZONING: INDUSTRIAL I \ \ / 06071C8630J. \ / III 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS TOTAL F PARCELS / III TOTAL SITEBER ACREAGE:232932ACRES 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS LEGAL DES CRIPTION APN:ZONING: MEDIUM PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 40.8653 AS PER ZONING:MEDIUM NORTH PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MAP PREPARATION DATE 0 20 40 80 5/5/2020 MAP REVISION DATE SCALE: 1"=40' O. 1941210DS DATE: 2020 DDESIGNED:: xo �mley»)Horn TENTATIRE-igI81013MAP 20164 CHECKED: ESA OF I SHEETS 7fi3 TIE CITY DRIVE SUITE 200,ORANGE,CA 91Bfi0 Pw cK REF: HExe n4-w9-1wo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA no. REVISIONS DATE BY F.B. WAW.KIMIEY-HORN.COM DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Orbis Rancho Partners LLC ("Owner") owns an approximately 2.33 acre property located at 8768 Archibald Avenue immediately south of 9th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") ("Site"). While a majority of the Site is currently vacant, approximately 25% of the Site is improved with a commercial building and its associated parking. At this time, the Owner wishes to construct a "Lab Store" concept 7-Eleven convenience store of 4,595 square feet, a 2,005 square foot co- branded quick service restaurant, and 16 fueling stations ("Project"). The co- branded quick service restaurant will be occupied by Laredo Taco and situated in the same building as the 7- Eleven. Access to the Project will be provided on 9th Street via a full access driveway and on Archibald Avenue with right-in/right-out access only. The Project is part of a new concept that 7-Eleven deems the "Lab Store" and one of less than a handful of other Lab Stores where customers can try and buy the latest innovations in a revolutionary store format. The Lab Store concept evolved from the reality that customers demand more than just bread and milk from convenience retailing. The Lab Store will provide organic and healthy food options that differ from the traditional convenience store customer experience._The store will provide a new customer experience with patio and inside dining areas that offer made-to-order smoothies, agua frescas, street tacos on handmade tortillas, and baked-in-store cookies and croissants. Many of the new items in the Lab Store will be offered on a limited-time basis with new offerings on a routine basis. The innovative concept will be customer-focused by exploring new ideas that are currently not available in the current market. The Lab Store and restaurant will provide residents and visitors an additional option for shopping and dining in the south west area of the City were services are currently limited. In short, the Lab Store is a place for customers to taste and buy new food and beverage items. The 2,005 square foot quick service restaurant, Laredo Taco Company, is famous in South Texas for its handmade tortillas, barbacoa, carne guisada and fresh salsa bar. All of which, are prepared onsite and made to order. The Project will create approximately 21 new jobs, which are allocated between 15 jobs and 6 jobs for the Lab Store and the Laredo Taco, respectively. The Project proposes enhanced architectural detailing that is inspired by modern and mid- century modern architecture that mimics details of this style including a butterfly roof design on the gas canopy and angled roof design on the convenience store/restaurant building, use of concrete and natural materials, placement of windows, steel work, and covered patio canopy. The City recognizes in the General Plan, that the Southwest Focus Area is isolated from commercial and retail uses such as restaurants, grocery stores, etc. The Project, which is one block north of the SW focus area, provides for indoor and outdoor dining, access to healthy food options as well as convenience items, and fuel in an innovative experience and design setting, which will positively contribute to an area of the City that is currently lacking such amenities. The Project is located at the corner of Archibald Avenue and E 9th Street within a Exhibit C Pagb68 E 3 commercial/industrial land use area and will not impact residential uses. The Project is within a 10-15 walking distance of a large number of residential neighborhoods and businesses in the area. Given that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 "Infill" Categorical Exemption (among other exemptions), it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to the City's development code and land use regulations, the Project is consistent with the existing zoning and qualifies as a permitted use subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, because the existing commercial building will remain in place, the entitlements will include a parcel map to create two separate legal parcels for the Project and the existing commercial building and its associated parking, independently. In the current retail market, customers have come to expect the ability to purchase alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores and quick service restaurants. Accordingly, the Project will require both a Type 20- Off-Sale Beer& Wine license and a Type 41 - On-Sale Beer& Wine—Eating Places license for onsite consumption of beer and wine at Laredo Taco from the Alcoholic Beverage Control and a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination from the City. A letter of Justification to support the PCN has been submitted with the application. This Project supports the goals and policies of the General Plan (LU-3.7, Goal LU-6, LU-9.1, and LU-9.4) and the City Council Goal #4 to attract new businesses to increase ongoing net revenues for the City. 0245-000-- 940359. Page F •1.- � �{ •}_tied ,,� '1 ryf�T i ce WON* ti5�, �,'' .-fir •�..� - c r + .°�` `jti�y.:ti v a 3 ,�, , . . - -ti-i 1 �~ c i�,..�, t - J. ••.�,� .ref_ :. - . - " . BRAND GUIDELINES _ EST. 2017 �} r:7 'F �,D F e � r ! �t,�+�r} s l�,�+' � auf r� y 'A.� e: -, •C`e F4 N��• -e �44, � i 5� F,� F � l���.�;3c� � '��-„� `•y�t'T;E�:"�+::lF '�.h tAP .����' � �� �?!{n,.i.a. -•� '•4 ! �� .'f✓-� i. i:• kl �. � l • + „� -�� 1�� xr. �.1 .1e ,r��+ � `^ i w �`q � �� '� �. tit, i' �=_;�yfiY�{���•`i Jf e��air�"+'� ?"Y.,- y�`..."�Ri. -�..1 � _G� ! •? 5SY'�7 t+�{ ,) iTA`{: ��+��fK" -,,. �, �i�,{�[ .+`�•. i i .dY. �l.Y 1 I � sS-� W S O � 0 a w o co m • �# � S '9 I Y G m x n'1 i r m W W N N di O fO O 1 i m f i I o I Page 609 R K r I= r-r j i - r I?4 t- F m m cr w w m R �• m m0 �. w ❑ c w a ,� R g a mR o m ol _ o _ o c 'a m u o — m o •K o o c o m c v n v =R w O n T " v o 3 3 o w R t et m H o a, � o i 's •� M G n m N 3 m = m x 2 O � N m � m m m = c m r a d { m m cQ v o 3 H o w o i°. . `� Page 609 \ _ ID113 ( \ _ • \ � - 0 cl � � , / 2 ; - _ _ _ . "A \ ) _ ( )' I _ / } } \ \ ` 0 a, ■� & s | § % § t — , � f - � AOL lb ■ s � �� �• . \ \ ~ , ` Page 680 l \ � or - - 'bob A � f NOW rn � 1 4 o n P w a mfD 31 rorn _ cc m 3 m p o m o `° w ? N d ^ N, sr a 1 m o a 3 w y o � 3 a p_ m �n o "� `4 T � 0 3 ro _a C3 1p � N Sp (� p m m o m p' 0 a S � C O Page 685 cr Cm d {� c S O T T cm0. m p m d V' • • • N d N J` p Z a O n N m -C• a C d N m p 3 F T m CD ro S v n �n C o 3 o -� v 0 a m y tlCi ry S N V_ n p 19 Co a j S � cn E c p rn °.-' .m 0n rn d a T a N d � T m T �_ p y N m w J o 3 cn 0 0 C f d m - m � N m 3 0 0 T D O d T CO CM o q < fir`m z o `6 O n N a � m a 0 m m °i c O (/Oi A o cn' O m n cn !TT z m 3 n c �• O _ T � p rri �• O � N �C `e [p v A. Nco O m d jp �p 1O % Y q M �_ C d G y y IE = w m LID a cm m i S K g `n m d w w o N. a mZL p o CL ; Page 686 i ............ wti •yr�y�r` � .'� fit • P _ � K W4- 3 N o w S Li o m c m cr' c m 3 3 a s m A 2 s w 3. o sr o R. m a Z Z w m � U b d w 3 m � ° T ti'c ° a, w r i -. 3 E vryry _. � T ry ..G O poem in N m 2 m w a m w w w m Q m � ° °e m °c •[ o � E co c w o y n a T N T m O O SD o m W Page 689 AOr` r 4'. 1. 1 li x F 4 Z 4 <9 F. m 4+ m m 0. -' E m m p H a m w :^ o m udi m o s m m N E 3 T w m •c '° ° n" ° o S c_ F w c m o 0 d o FLc J o O S N p O L1.T y —`C ry T �D o J y w 7 to A N C d VI S S n o �. — m Z o m x o N m m -10 < F m °—' m p a m m m E m m m x k m T e a J m E m o J mCDv n a a a o v J p a s o °_ 3 N o = v m o _ 117 �pp N Z ti `C a m F J j " N p ey M E Q ry �' N m o c io 3 � tr.�n a T m �° y i LO eD p ID O p m A J C p n O O C. m .. A `� Page 690 2. C n C n t n C o ; -i 2 a 0S C) m 0 o p p p a p m 9 rL pZ2 U1 mS r 3 ry3y to f r ti Y N v n c o :E A °a n 0 m a ro ] n o c x E¢ m o n n m m5 en �C T x °' z � rn m i G) m' 1 Jz O� 10 K d p ° 4 T N ern jcolli m n g m f N O S S O O 0 m o b /4 • • O • • °. ' q S. m In a o E y ' p liCS IE o p f�l I P'n w N a E �' D ° y m • S N P c E — �° ° r s o m 3" m EL Q • 0 P C v or n O O m a i a90 -O rn cn S N C v Page 699 ' + r, c v m Z m 1, Page 688 N O N _ T r O o ; 3 3� T" a n T m o. � C/) o0) u n¢r m a K Ov ,$ n_g, s , b a n �i u r Z w n m E ,R" m 'S w m m n T � � o c { a �c m ° S i x p r o c n n H G1 p m �p a �.` � g O ° K Q N - T S m m 0. m 0 —p nA n nw �^ m 0 0 m O Ov ` 2. O m'S � m n3 ° p 2 d A = a ,Fr c E, c - a T m a T IQ m N S ro ro S D_ ro ro ?g v p g m 3 n ? a m rP 2 p m n � S c O � g az Q � a N Fr- O � m N Page 683 N N �r CO) ,a � n� m j n „� •- ' m (n 0 m w M 3 x � N � A N � A a M C'n m 0 om O 20,E 4! K a � a S F R_ C K N N v 451. 0 Ul Sn w 0 R1 n RL F O $7 a ° m °v moo` m p ➢.A� c �: ° m m e n O W N 0 o n a c F m 3 a � � � W a m rc E w m N ^y e C1 A m m g y ry � p � � ep O d° am m R o 3 L. ° �� a H m 7 a T O z cm D o n e. q= o 1 =p v c n o _ b � � A N W Page 689 N A yy { S G r oil S. RI ° m Qo- N i^ F 0 8=e 'Zo e z m T 0. am —_g. aQ m s Z op 80 ! oc a T ° m Ir .o w 8 E : w cd O .Z7 _ afo w$ a o $ T m 3 A xZL 4 m ro 'm o O 1 0 N ° m F in a y R a' `L a e a- o o w o e ° m f N m T r �n fnm y m ' � CO A m IT1 a T o _ O _ G) O o ° q � o N N - ° W N � FF N — w a T v °a 3 - o a 3 v e o m Z o N `� Page 689 ® [ o p Fl�l/) , !#!2W, » ( 0 CAJ V7 � °» - ƒ� i, } J E 2 / � - « § f 2 } 2 ¥ � # G ■ !!§ 2 ! \( rr� k((ƒI \} I O /t | - �� £f E¥ \ ( ■ iffy({» �}ƒ%24 ■ ; ;f\fƒ % f � , {\/7(■ - � k }) X23 } To } } \0 �� /(B" (lyzff , �� ! Page e — - � » � � . p \ _ }\E � �. � m GOI crt 0 m coo) k k � _ _ m § # m ° 3 — 2 ® ( / \ ( m \ \ ( ( I � ! g (\ § » %) q � \ \ . 0o } I§ /0o { ®/ § w \ _ ^ \ . \\ \ \ �� • � \ \ � \ Page 685 ca 0 ' o 0 3. n 3 0 r R1 0 0 o o a s w ? S C ° 3 r 6 -' 'p Z 0 0 a' T ° 3 a CID'm o' m D m m N s o a r $ O m O Cn 0-0 lGi 's n ° " C H a T N Z 3 S vw VI . m o m c a sr a 9 _ 1 N O = r O m 3 d ' /j n B A - FA a p L It m aA irs Y:A Page 686 W N a 3 v a O y �•� A'' m m S .Z7 s m 0 'w =' w O O •i S N .O-. � F y. N R V T N- N R inp m m en' IS y o 3 3 o A 3 Cr o m a N O O T H O W ? b O O p w 0. e m S O % 00 N _ N � S 1 f u W Page 6055 w a f7 d'9 T iE �p m N N n S mz rw fA ■+ w r.+ w � �S $W b -a m m a � v m � z `C N o 0 m w n m i.0y ply ! ,P A�yy z rn -m c w ''-9I oo _�l GA -9 Oo �°-o o °'-, �IC � C vclI y v. z � c N N C = to C I:t 100 C! '_ 1 n o N _ J N J fA �I CI a O I�I m �I`i a � � w - n 3 o w a Y m .. J u N b c b H E ° R lE 'b'� 6. n fG O z L14 N �rl tANIZI to IN Z o a N n 04 9E wo 3naE..A9t rQaQC1 ?3b1 0 0 a QOQO P n Nio > qq�� TT V O0 �i� , ' Aid'I � � o . WJD 'a IId 10 N vrnFRp 'M F W A a- os_i. voAcm m Lam•+ 1 � m 3 < c Z I i 3 p torr1 I r n o °c m o m 2.3 m m iHr� J yII Ii jp � : ,l I iNl�3ii 11,,�� ACCENT i BODY COPY TYPE� SUBHEAD TYPE F J O T A N x nx wS pg a ° s a n a¢ K 2�;7 Coll) d Aa O m z mim a ° 00 _ S. d m a m -' n a-ai °a "nti no 91 z � '� 2Z Z gti Zccmi 3 n ° 3 y k 3 A 3 m w 3 5Co Q' irF F f n E RL 4 n N d a CD mom '�� 0 � j 0 1 C2 ti W a A n � w -0 C0 W CD CW9 W co wA Urµ m v Cob rG7 C9 70 C7 C C '� m m C7 vl y c C) F Co Inc cODo C x cCo cc CD cm 7C < 4D ado = !n x N C < X X N N Page SEA w rn aa m a Es ro = c (n O 5, 3 tA JA A g.3 2L 1 Z 11 ro O 0 G1i O C1l a m W co � C o a a cv 1 Co m T + a J O�7 • O�7 `-� o F a 0 3 m t!,6 Q9;9 m 614 en rn o z q C Iz Iz r Y v Z Z A p 9 i , rn rm .� rrj- P.�m'c•y � n��'N � 3 6 R CD 8 � � } A a rnom 0 0 LA ' w Page 909 w sd '4.w m Y m ? g n ,� ,, 0 9 o 25, • o rri Iv co 'm m r CM 1 Y w rkn Orm G � Q o � _ dNam S p 3 6 w T o _ 1 � 3 m y Q C { P .,: Ait Q �io n� y w�A I q C)rm �, IE o ,. w �. CD r rm W Page 908 C g I rn rri E 9rr� SR. y 40 M o rn UNi z m o ' < 14 OO e. c va oil f ,L A C a ��C ° dv m ° 'a Izi w p 2.3 ° iS O P C To Y g IW 1 A n w } F ��R mm m P £ E Q wns m 3» m � � moo• - a�T 62 i o T m N o R gi q, Page 4503 v t� r y t � 1 COO � o f f 5 , Page f®d y Z I mp ; O Z C" Ch • + A t • r` 3 �' r O 2 a 0 C7 Q u =0 sk • �I• f!1 � a c fA ;13 c o H y s u C mz c7z ab .. n p o b o $ O Oo O � ° n e N V. a . } o; N-0m a p r G a p a Q ♦. wm N;� _� 3 °,gym r� oOPO _ a CD } 9 H 10 MP Ln .� :s � � a b .a r O r y V' .� ww '\) Page 909 Met rre 2 w �,1 C w * I ry '_ � rri rn _ f n' rm cn a � - 5 # :0 v a rn rn a �� Ta ti o0 4 W712 70 3 3m co ow G w Z 7D � Ca �; g � . rn � v com © © p da. © z Col.) �7�6 �� LA r7l N r o s o 4 � C 7t} � �' ca :E � o T ZEicm m N 1 1"r7 n o r" n .� �C A C 3 rri Cool r— (A c rm C=, x. 0 al r o ,do!9 Page NO � ©.% . ° \ 0 \ ^� �\ t • - \ �, � © ` . . � i � � ~ . . \ � . - @rLrIOC ƒ m � / \ 0 \ ( ( { � / m �< - z m rn C=x . . } % « � } « ff7 . - R A Ll - ` � ¥� \ ( K � - _ - . � � \ � - . Page US 0 q / W m "1 O m a ° m leef 0 3 II S = N ? c y F 2 Y ,� - _ {�t y 0 n m Y S a A ° w w v t O T # z � � v m 1 A .I { +'•• � I❑' M L w 5 � Page 996 LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION 7-Eleven Fuel Station and Convenience Store at 9th Street&Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7-Eleven is proposing to construct an automotive fuel station and convenience store ("Store") on vacant land located on the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7-Eleven will be applying for a Type 20 license to allow the sale of beer and wine at the convenience store. The sale of alcoholic beverages is being offered as a convenience to customers who do not want to travel to another location that sells alcoholic beverages (i.e., a liquor store or another convenience store). In the current retail market, customers have come to expect alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores. The sale of alcoholic beverages will comply with all applicable regulations for the concurrent sale of fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code Section 23790(d)). According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverages ("ABC"), this Store is located in an area of overconcentration (Census Tract 21.05: 3 licenses allowed; 8 active licenses). Due to the over-concentration of liquor licenses in the census tract, Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code requires City Council to approve a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity prior to issuance of the requested Type 20 License. The following information supports a determination that a Type 20 license at this Store will serve the public convenience. 1. 7-Eleven has policies and procedures to ensure the safe sale of alcoholic beverages. 7-Eleven takes the right to sell age-restricted alcoholic beverages very seriously and ensures that all alcoholic beverages are sold in a legal and responsible manner. As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store employees, the company has put in place one of the most comprehensive crime-deterrence programs in the convenience store industry. These policies and procedures ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages for off- site consumption at this location will not cause or contribute to crime in the area or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 7-Eleven's policies and procedures include the following: "Operation Alert" Training Program. All 7-Eleven employees and new franchisees participate in a multimedia training program on security procedures, proper store maintenance, violence avoidance, and recommended behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially violent encounter. Each trainee is supplies with comprehensive resource materials on crime deterrence and violence avoidance. The robbery rate at 7-Eleven stores has decreased by 65% since implementation of this program. Exhibit D Page NO Responsible Alcohol Sales Training. 7-Eleven trains all cashiers and managers to sell alcohol in compliance with California law, such as age verification and prevention of sales of alcoholic beverages that may be detrimental to the public welfare (i.e., the sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons). In addition, the training includes the rules associated with the concurrent sale of automotive fuel and alcoholic beverages. Time-Access Safes. 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no more than $50 ($30 at night) in the cash register. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than $30 is kept in the cash register after dark and that the store staffers cannot open the safe. All 7-Eleven stores use a Timed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal amount of money in the register yet still serve customers efficiently. One section of the time-accessed safe contains a locked drop-safe where large bills and checks are deposited by the clerk. Another section dispenses change (coins or bills) only at predetermined time intervals. Security Cameras. 7-Eleven maintains state-of-the art video camera system and alarms in its stores nationwide. This system includes a 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor mounted in clear view of the customers. The alarm system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. The cameras will allow 7-Eleven to confirm whether cashiers comply with all verification requirements for sale of alcoholic beverages. Lighting and "Fishbowl" Layout. The Store will install bright interior and exterior lighting, including adjacent public sidewalks and alley to create a safer environment. In addition, 7-Eleven will place the cash register in the front of the store and keep windows in front of the sales area free of signs and merchandise so police and others can see inside. This is called the "fishbowl" effect because store employees are on display for passersby, including police to see. The "fishbowl" effect will deter crime and minors from attempting to purchase alcoholic beverages at the Store. Quantity, Display, and Storage of Alcoholic Beverages. 7-Eleven will not sell "airline" or small-size bottles of single beers less than 20 ounces at this location. In addition, in accordance with the Business and Professions Code there will be no display of alcoholic beverages in an ice-tub or within five-feet of the front door or cash register and there will be no advertisements for alcoholic beverages on the motor fuel islands. 2. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the 7-Eleven fuel station will be a public convenience and will not have a detrimental effect on the immediate neighborhood. For more than 80 years, 7-Eleven has been American's neighborhood food store, bringing convenience into the lives of millions. Approving a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption is appropriate for a fuel station convenience store with the size and variety of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to be found, and is a service Page 970 typically expected by the public at such fuel station convenience stores. 7-Eleven's training and safety protocols will ensure that alcoholic beverages are sold in accordance with law. By including the sale of alcoholic beverages at the Store, customers looking for an easy "one-stop" experience while they pump gas are accommodated. "One-stop" shopping results in increased efficiency for customers, and is consistent with the operational plan of convenience stores. Furthermore, by providing one-stop shopping, the Store will provide a convenience to the community that may result in fewer vehicle trips and less traffic congestion. Customers would be inconvenienced if they were forced to purchase gas and snacks at the fuel station convenience store, and alcoholic beverages at a liquor store or at another similar location that may not have the training and controls that 7-Eleven employs. Alcoholic beverages will not comprise a significant amount of shelf space within the Store, and will only amount to a small percentage of the total annual sales from the convenience store. The sale of beer and wine will only be ancillary to the sale of gas and other snacks and items typically contained in a fuel station store, but nevertheless, are still necessary and an expected convenience for the consumer. The evolution of fuel stations and convenience stores over the years is that it now commonplace for fuel station/convenience stores to possess a Type 20 or 21 license in California. Modern day customers have become accustomed to stopping at a fuel station/convenience store for their basic needs, including alcoholic beverages. The sale of alcoholic beverages will not affect the peace or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. On the contrary, 7-Eleven's policies and procedures will ensure that alcohol is sold in a legal and responsible manner while enhancing the convenience for customers so that they have an easy one-stop shopping experience. 3. Concurrent Sale of Fuel and Alcoholic Beverages The sale of alcohol will be in strict compliance with California law and all other applicable standards requested by ABC, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, and the City Council. As mentioned above, the State has specific rules that regulate the concurrent sale of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code § 23790.5(d)). These include the following: • No alcoholic beverages shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unless it is in a permanently affixed cooler. • No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. • No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. Page 1179 • No display or sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from an ice tub. • No alcoholic beverages advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self- illuminated advertising for alcoholic beverages shall be located on buildings or windows. • Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. who sell alcoholic beverages shall be at least 21 years of age to sell alcoholic beverages. Page 928 ow Security Plan ELEVEII n PHYSICAL SECURITY ❑ A SECURITY SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED THAT WILL COMBINE PANIC BUTTON "SILENT"ALARM REMOTE AND A CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION MONITOR TO SECURE THE PREMISES. THE MAIN HUB OF THIS SYSTEM WILL BE LOCATED IN THE OFFICE WITHIN THE STORE. DATA WILL BE STORED FOR 30 DAYS. EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED TO PROVIDE DATA TO POLICE WHEN REQUESTED. ❑ SECURITY CAMERAS: EIGHT(8) STATE OF THE ART SECURITY CAMERAS WILL BE INSTALLED, FOUR EXTERIOR AND FOUR INTERIOR,TO MONITOR ACTIVITY AND TO AVOID ANY PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS. LOCATION OF THE CAMERAS ARE SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN. ❑ THE CAMERAS WILL BE OPERATING 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT 7-ELEVEN PROVIDES A SAFE AND UPSCALE ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR PATRONS. ❑ OUR MAIN POS REGISTER IS BEING REPOSITIONED SO THAT THE PERSON AT THE SALES COUNTER CAN SEE THE ACTIVITY AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE FUEL PAD AREA. Page 621 Page 713 Page 177 Security Plan lELEIIEn o . OPERATIONAL SECURITY CASH CONTROL— CONTRACTUALLY STORES ARE REQUIRED TO DO DEPOSIT DAILY RECEIPTS AT BANK SO THAT MINIMAL CASH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PREMISES AT ANY GIVEN TIME. LIMITED AMOUNT OF CASH ON THE PREMISES WILL IN A WELL SECURED AND TIMED SAFE.ALTERNATIVELY,ARMORED VEHICLE PICK IS DONE THREE TIMES A WEEK. POS-WE WILL USE ONLY ONE REGISTER AT NIGHT. DOLLAR BILLS HIGHER THAN 20'S AND LARGER ARE DEPOSITED RIGHT AWAY IN A TIME LOCK SAFE FRONT SIGN & LOITERING-WE WILL POST THE SIGN AT THE FRONT DOOR TO SAY"STORE HAS LESS THAN $40 AFTER DARK"AND"TIME LOCK SAFE — CLERK CANNOT OPEN"."NO LOITERING"SIGN WILL ALSO BE POSTED. STORE MAY PLAY CLASSICAL MUSIC ON THE EXTERIOR TO DESIST LOTERING. SALE OF ALCOHOL— HOURS OF BEER AND WINE SALES (NO HARD LIQUOR, NO SINGLE CANS OF BEER SMALLER THAN 40 OZ. AND NO SINGLE MALTS) SHALL BE FROM 6 AM — 2 AM,SEVEN DAYS A WEEK.ALL ALCOHOL VAULT DOORS WILL BE LOCKED AND SECURED AT 2 AM. EMPLOYEES ARE TRAINED TO ASK FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER WHO DO NOT LOOK OF AGE TO PURCHASE BEER AND WINE AND EMPLOYEES ARE ALSO TAUGHT TO FOLLOW PROTOCOLS OF (ABC). Page 622 Page 714 Page 178 Security Plan ELEIIEn o . OPERATIONAL SECURITY HOURS— OPERATION HOURS WILL BE 24 HOURS, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. LIGHTING —STORE WILL BE WELL LIT, INSIDE AND OUTSIDE, CLEAN AND ORGANIZED TO CREATE A"FISHBOWL"EFFECT,A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO OUR PATRONS. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LIGHTING TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE PREMISES, INCLUDING ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDE WALKS AND ALLEY TO CREATE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT. ❑ LITTER CONTROL— REMOVAL OF LITTER WILL BE ON A DAILY BASIS INCLUDING ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ALLEY UNDER THE LICENSEE'S CONTROL. GRAFFITI — REMOVAL OF ALL GRAFFITI TO THE STOREFRONTSHALL BE DONE WITH 24— 48 HOURS OF NOTICE OR KNOWLEDGE. FRANCHISEE WILL WORK WITH POLICE TO UNDERSTAND ANY GANG ACTIVITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Page 623 Page 715 Page 179 For more than 80 Years,7-Eleven has been American's THE"FISHBOWL" neighborhood food store,bringing convenience into the lives of millions.As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and Its neighborhood store Research indicates that robbers do not like stores that CRIME employees,the company has put in place one of the are brightly lit,with store staffers and cash registers most comprehensive c me-deterrence programs in clearly visible from the street.That is why 7-Eleven DETERRENCE EL the convenience store industry. puts the cash register in the front of the stores and PROGRAM7-Eleven developed and implemented its robbery and keeps windows in front of the sales area free of signs violence deterrence program In 1975-76,based on and merchandise so police and others can see inside. search interviews with convicted robbers.The It's called the"fishbowl"effect because store JV An (program has bean continually updated with ongoing employees are on display for passersby,including rch.7-Eleven's crime-detemenca program is Police,to see.As part of a nationwide remodeling to Provide.safe h.ppir�q (based on four primary components of visibility into program,the company installed bright interior and _ -"-_ _ .and out of the stores,lighting,effective cash control, exterior lighting. JWW and store-personnel training.Additionally,7-Eleven has installed video surveillance systems in its stores. TIMED-ACCESS SAFES More Than "OPERATION ALERT"TRAINING Research also shows that keeping less than$50 in the Years30 - - - cash register deters 80 percent of potential robbers. 7-Eleven corporate-store employees and new Most robbers say the"risk"is greater than the"take" franchisees participate in multimedia training for that small amount of money. Store-Personnel Training Program program and are supplied with comprehensive 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no materials on crime deterrence and violence more than$50($30 at night)in the cash register_ avoidance. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than$30 is Timed-Access Cash Controllers The program,called"Operation Alart",includes kept in the cash register after dark and that the store information on security procedures,proper store staffers cannot open the safe.All 7-Eleven stores use intananca,violence avoidance and recommended a Timed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal InsideBright Lighting _ Outside behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially amount of money in the register yet still serve violent encounter. customers efficiently. The training emphasizes the high values the company One section of the timed-access safe contains a Closed-Circuit Televisionplaces on the safety of all 7-Eleven store personnel locked drop-safe where large bills and checks are and customers,and 7-Elavan's no-resistance deposited by the clerk.Another section dispenses Surveillance Cameras philosophy toward robbery.At 7-Eleven,the safety of change(coins or bills)only at predetermined time store personnel and customers is more important than intervals. protecting the company's money or property during a robbery. Page 624 Page 716 Page 180 STATE-OF-THE-ART removing signs from store windows.The result was a -7-Eleven completed a nationwide installation VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEMS 30 percent decrease in robberies in the test stores. of closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its _ _ stores.The company updated its robbery :9 r'w-A six-month follow-up study in Houston deterrence/violence avoidance training program for 7-Eleven has spent millions of dollars to install and indicated the same 30 percent decrease in robberies. store personnel. maintain state-of-the-art video camera systems and The message was that robbers steal for cash,and if alarms in its stores nationwide.This system includes a stores reduce their cash availability and publicize it, 2003-7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio they can deter robberies.The robbery deterrence teenage robbers to see if the younger robbers looked capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor program-including training for store personnel, cash at things differently than the adult robbers.The study mounted in clear view of the customers.The alarm management,additional field staff security managers, found that they look at the target and security system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. posters, signs and decals-was adopted measures in essentially the same way,with escape companywide. route and money being the most important factors. FACTS -A study for 7-Eleven by Athena Research 2004-The Operation Alert training program was The robbery 7-Elevenhas decreased Corporation (Athena)found that security cameras and updated including computer-based training for all by 65 •_ deterrence alarms did not reduce the robbery rate in the stores. program was • . _ _• in 1976. experimental stores.7-Eleven began installation of timed-access cash controller safes in its stores. 2005-7-Eleven began installing new safes with 7-Eleven is recognized high-speed bill acceptors and additional security and industryand - - agencies as 7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of accountability features. majorthe first - - formal crime armed robbers in prison.The results indicated deterrence program - •- robbers still looked for the same things in stores 2007-"Operation Alert"training, including visibility, Operation Program targeted for robbery-cash availability and visibility lighting and cash control, has been reemphasized in into and out of the stores. all of its stores. been certified/approved in several states. 1991 -One part of a three-part study by the National Associations of Convenience Stores showed robbery HISTORY OF 7-ELEVEN'S decreased in the first year after installation of ROBBERY DETERRENCE PROGRAM high-resolution, closed-circuit television systems and alarms. 1975-The Western Behavioral Sciences Institute, in 1993-7-Eleven began natonwide installation of conjunction with 7-Eleven stores, conducted a closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its robbery deterrence study with a grant from the U.S. stores as part of its nationwide remodeling program. Department of Justice. In the test stores, robbery deterrence measures recommended by robbers were -Athena conducted new research of armed implemented in order to determine their impact on robbers in prison to update its 1985 study,which crime.These steps included training employees in indicated robbers still looked for the same factors. robbery deterrence, reducing available cash and Page 525 -� 57fis1t.�,� • , r �. 7i,�.f} x F >f 4 �i_ � �. ,,,,, Arco Gas Stationi ►. �S • t w �m I _ ail 'a I�R • cr: , .w:+y POW i Chevron Gas Station IG Carl's Liquor -- - tt * 'r f t/i'iq • Cam' C ��C'� - C;Rnd::r-aroy���'b f•,+"._ • .. a�psh m- y a Str• I•i � rT �- �'�j, .r r �' �, r �v� n;; • Il�r: I�� _. �i. s• �m�l;Ii ; �'i. i _ y � C-ies�ca=Ct. ' _���• �+a1'.a1ti,9. �i `� 1? _ �' ." :;y � ram• -+ ��ii r,� r ���Y. '�s •� Y� �_ ry.,i:r. '�, �• m It .o ,•: w■ Illp. r, �,.��x..•" ,y �, 1i(1 a � ^•, � �� •� � "� a q .. m �'4' ¢ � �� t s. �.. � Norfolk r.`m 4�, � n•Lezf�r f !•` � .w1 I µ o.,� v _ oo Sl, ' l ti r =~ 1• M ! w. s: w i - _ � u �•i•rd � i ', �� �f 1ortdav'� ��w ;a�,� � i�l��dr�J I, - O� .p,. � � s' 'r - • � .a._ �.w ��N• ;� 1.e�.�'';.. ,s r`}' •rs } i9.AiitlMi•s��gpi �I��NF }.� �,�,,i'1 � ^aa 1.•�3f „� •�++ - �#6 • �" ' HI rNi: ai ,kY.v� R' iw -° '•' �1. � ��.aw-ky',It_•le��Py =k: o'end u Station .pp • •d to ay;ice . ,t• D �. be �. A ='•- i Plaee IHII���''Ia,. t'14 i+�'\ f" � I,� „� I � , r : • '. � � � i a'i,i►'�i i F '`�� ��� . -,••s ��f� ! � ,+ �� T m . � F � i vim'• m � � ,' �, s� ' F nlrt � Wx--��. ^l�a;�1� -`• �:\ +y,k1;�/fir� ..d�`��rFr- �' �.. �iS�' '!. ���,,,f. •i x y a= � � �tii�l •1 l4o,Ty+ti. �K. '� k�� � ,a ;•:��-+r�r•.r �.'- r{ � ~r m� `' � - m�' -.a� sp� •:7l twat ;�, �' E � m .rJr? o''�ti'�'a+ •f��`� F - 'i���'e � ee �rr �r�iw .'� r• �s-yP' Easy Shop Market • 1 it,l, a a �i - - - Arr• o le- JL �� 8usinessm�en�e•�� :.,'_ �p - `` w AL Station76 Gas "� �S '��. � P��� � � I - • ��x ?��'� �'� S � T('�d •�L'I 4neyrSt a ' } r • �� U ■ x P e 6rest Pr_ �` -. _ "" All �w r 41 ,I� 4 I I I ' I '�i � 1. 1 1 1 • • ' • I I I 043, 5 r j e 11 I •1 I I , ,� - E j III C ri b _ it Am 9 •I r. L r W Ed .F.�1Y•y+���"� -.k; iwAi i�•I �' 1 � 4 E i ael've�sow5 i yL� �� DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Sean McPherson, AICP January 19, 2021 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS/7-ELEVEN -- A request for site plan and architectural review of a new commercial building and service station located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Site Characteristics: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91 Street. The north half of the site is largely vacant while the south half is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and associated improvements such as a parking lot—this building is not directly related to the proposed project and will remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9t' Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9t" Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (G1) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential (R) District Prolect Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The north elevation faces 91" Street, with the proposed outdoor patio connecting to the sidewalk via pedestrian walkways. The east elevation fronts on Archibald Avenue. A large landscaped setback with multiple pedestrian paths connects the sidewalk along Archibald Avenue to the proposed building and outdoor patio. The site plan illustrates an interior dining area for Laredo Taco, a convenience store area, food preparation areas, bathrooms, and employee backrooms and storage areas. Primary entrances to the building are proposed at the north elevation and west elevations. Exhibit F Page 980 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORB1S17-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 2 Vehicular access is provided to the site via an access driveway along 911 Street to the west of the proposed building, and another access driveway along Archibald Avenue to the south of the proposed building. Staff notes that an existing vehicular driveway currently provides access to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building. This driveway is proposed to be closed off with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. Access to this existing building and parking lot is proposed via a new shared access driveway leading to the south from the proposed 7-Eleven development. Architecture: The proposed commerciallrestaurant building exhibits a modern vernacular design theme and provides a variety of colors and materials. Notably, each building elevation incorporates a tri-colored metal band, which, according to the applicant, may or may not be illuminated. The east, west and south elevations include a prominent angled wall feature composed of fiberwood siding (Nichiha-brand "Vintagewood Cedar'), though staff notes that this feature is most prominent on the west facade of the building facing interior to the site. The north elevation is dominated by corrugated metal siding (Centria-brand "154 Dark Bronze"), a feature which is also prominently featured on the east and west elevations. Additional fiber cement panels (Nichiha-brand "Empireblock — Gray") along each elevation, and stucco finish along the north, south and east elevations compliment the design. Each elevation also incorporates anodized aluminum storefront glass throughout. The project proposes a varied color pallet, including lighter tones such as "Silverpointe" (SW 7653) and "Reflective White" (SW 7757), and darker colors used for features such as the covered outdoor patio ("Tricorn Black," SW 6256). Staff notes that the applicant proposes a flat-roofed canopy to cover the 14 fueling stations. This canopy incorporates the same tri-colored metal band as the building, which is reflected across each elevation. This is not proposed to be illuminated. The color pallet of the fueling canopy mimics the color pallet of the proposed building. At 17 feet in height, the flat-roofed canopy is intended to be subordinate to the convenience/restaurant building. This is reflected in its lower profile (17 feet in height as opposed to 20 feet in height for the convenience/restaurant building). The proposed project exceeds all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? (approx.) Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(1-foot increment from the feet(fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% (inclusive of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet Front Building Setback Min. 25 feet (covered YES (9'" Street) patio); 86.4 feet (proposed Page 920 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 3 building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy)_ Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Street Side Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (911 Average Depth of 25 feet (91 Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (gth Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(911 St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet(canopy) 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet canopy) Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landsca in : Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050- 1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Convenience Store 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9` Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Tentative Parcel Map: As noted, the project also proposes a Tentative Parcel Map to split the existing parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 Page 929 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 4 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along Y' Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0,65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Staff notes that the existing commercial industrial building currently provides 29 parking stalls. Due to the reconfiguration of access driveways relative to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building, Parcel 2 will lose approximately 3 parking stalls. In order that this existing building maintain its current number of parking stalls, a shared parking agreement shall be required pursuant to conditions of approval for the project. Staff Comments None Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Discuss whether the tri-colored metal band should be illuminated or not. Seconda Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee forward the item to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Staff Planner: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Plan Set Page 988 RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.33 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ADDRESSED 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of SUBTPM20164, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied the portion of Conditional Use permit DRC2020-00087 involving off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20) and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license. At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to the balance of the development application and return at a later date for consideration. 4. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 5. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Page 983 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 91h Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 is for the subdivision of the 2.33-acre project site into two parcels of land. The service station and convenience store will be located on Parcel 1 (1.86 acres) and the exiting multi-tenant commercial building will remain on Parcel 2 (.65 acres). The existing vehicular entrance serving the multi-tenant commercial building will be demolished, and a new entrance to Parcel 2 will be provided from a shared driveway with Parcel 1; and g. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 for review of the site plan and design of a service station and convenience store and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00138 for the operation of a service station and convenience store. Page 688 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan permits a variety of land uses within industrial districts, such as service stations and convenience stores. The Development Code permits both service stations and convenience stores within the General Industrial (GI) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two parcel tentative parcel map and the proposed service station with convenience store comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Development Code. Each parcel complies with the 0.50-acre minimum lot size and minimum required lot dimensions outlined in Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code. Additionally, the proposed service station and convenience store complies with all of the related development standards including buiding setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking and design; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed service station and convenience store as it is located at the intersection of two public streets and provides two points of vehicle access; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Environmental studies related to traffic, noise, air quality/greenhouse gasses and biological resources were submitted as part of the review of the project which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues, as the proposed tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels in order to create a separate parcel for the service station and convenience store apart from the existing multi-tenant commercial. The review of the project included the evaluation of environmental studies which concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment. f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres Page 589 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are General Industrial (GI) District, which permits the development and operation of service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial and residential development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption were found to not to be significantly impacted based on the following technical studies: an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). These technical studies determined that any impacts associated with the project will be less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Page 500 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 5 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 995 RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12, 2021, including written and oral Page 996 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 911 Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 91h Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). The proposed service station will operate 24 hours-a day, 7 days per week. Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 91h Street. The existing driveway which serves the existing multi-tenant industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Page 509 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 Resolution 21-19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant located within the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M. to 10:OOP.M. and proposes on- sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087; and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high-quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District which permits service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with all other Development Code requirements of the General Industrial (GI) District as provided in the table below: Page 690 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard (approx.) Maximum 35 feet(at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(I-footincrement from the feet(fueling setback line) cano 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback(9th Min. 25 feet feet(proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy) Street Side Min. 45 Feet(Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd—Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) buildin 31.9 feet(9th Average Depth of 25 feet(91h Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet(9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet(canopy) 120 feet Rear Yard Min. 0 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Page 999 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 5 Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public, health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, April 2021); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12t" DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Page 600 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 6 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 903 RESOLUTION NO. 21-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087 — A REQUEST TO OPERATE A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Page 908 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91" Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 91" Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidelwalk and the 91" Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land se, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the consutrction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 squre foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). The proposed service station will operate 24 hours-per-day, 7 days per week. Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 9tn Street. The existring driveway which serves the existing multi-tennt industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolutioin 21-19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant Page 509 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 3 located within the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M. to 10:OOP.M. and proposes on- sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087; and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, it meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high -quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 Page 000 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 4 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Categorical Exemption, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, April 2021); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley- Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: Page 005 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 006 Conditions of Approval RANCHO [�',,11CAMONGA Community Development Department ON Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A shared parking and access agreement between both resultant parcels relative to the tentative parcel map shall be recorded prior to final occupancy. 2. Signage and lighting shall be treated sensitively so as not to create a nuisance to residential properties across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all signage shall be either externally illuminated or provide "halo lit" illumination. Internally illuminated signage shall not be permitted. Further, lighting along pathways within landscaped setbacks along 9th Street and Archibald Avenue shall be treated with pedestrian level lighting, which may include low-level bollards with downlighting. The tri-colored band surrounding the building shall not be illuminated. 3. The applicant shall design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ("LEED") silver standards and cause the building to be certified as such by the U.S. Green Building Council. 4. Off-sale alcohol sales are prohibited pursuant to the Planning Commission's Resolution of Denial of off-sale alcohol sales dated March 10, 2021 and the applicant has withdrawn related requests for a determination of findings for Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. Electric vehicle charging stations shall be maintained in good working order and remain available to the public for use at all times. 6. In the event that the service station includes sale of diesel gasoline, diesel shall be replaced with biodiesel fuel in perpetuity. 7. All cigarette and tobacco products shall be only accessible by the cashier/clerk and not displayed near the store entrance. Further, no windows facing Archibald Avenue or within view of the elementary school across Archibald Avenue shall advertise tobacco or tobacco products, nor shall any window advertisements for alcohol sales relative to the restaurant be visible from Archibald Avenue or the elementary school. 8. Add your condition here! Standard Conditions of Approval g Printed:5/6/2021 www.CityofRC.us Page 009 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 11. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 14. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. www.CityofRC.us Page 040 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 2 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 16. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing ramp located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 2. The project shall share a common driveway on Archibald Avenue between parcels 1 and 2 of tentative parcel map 20164. www.CityofRC.us Page 009 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 3 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require 1-4" UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the south side of 9th Street along the project boundary. An additional 14" fiber optic conduit will be required on Archibald Ave along the project boundary where both of the end runs will require a 3'x4'x3' pullbox on each end. This infrastructure will eventually be interconnect to the City's existing fiber optic backbone conduit on the NWC of Archibald and 9th. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 1-2" UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit and/or vaults shall run into the building's telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 4. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 5. At the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue, this leg of the intersection shall be reconstructed with a 35-foot curb return radius. The ADA ramp at this leg of the intersection shall be constructed per current ADA regulations. City Drawing/Plan No. 1094 shows the traffic signal poles constructed behind a future 35-foot radius curb return. In the event a traffic signal pole was constructed in a location that conflicts with the reconstructed curb return (or if the pedestrian buttons do not meet current ADA regulations, or other unforeseen issues), the applicant shall prepare a traffic signal modification plan for review and approval by the City. The traffic signal modification shall be constructed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building certificate of occupancy. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Page 050 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 4 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Grading Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project shall be annexed into LMD3B, SLD 1 and SLD 6. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 053 Page 5 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Archibald Avenue Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia Common Name: California Sycamore Min. Grow Space: 40' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 40-feet Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Street Name: 9th Street Botanical Name: Quercus ilex Common Name: Holly Oak Min. Grow Space: 50' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 50' Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: www.CityofRC.us Page 009 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 6 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 16. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 17. Construct improvements as outlined in the traffic impact analysis and as follows, 1. At the intersection of 9th St and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the eastbound approach of 9th St from one left turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the eastbound approach of 9th St and construct all traffic signal equipment as needed. 1. At the intersection of Arrow Rte and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the northbound approach of Archibald Ave to include an additional exclusive right turn lane, and implement a right turn overlap including all traffic signal equipment as needed. A separate project had been conditioned to construct the following improvements, should these improvements be completed prior to the above improvements, a fair share contribution to the improvements constructed shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Improvements conditioned by separate project. A. Re-stripe the eastbound and westbound Arrow Route approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane and one shared through/right turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the westbound Arrow Route approach. C. Modify existing eastbound and westbound protected left turn operation to protected/permissive left turn operation, including all traffic signal equipment as needed. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. www.CityofRC.us Page 009 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 7 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 4. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan is required to be submitted to the San Bernardino County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Submittal can be made electronically through the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) at https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ 5. A Hazardous Materials Management Plan and a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement are required to be submitted to the Fire District. See Sections 5001.5.1 and 5001.5.2 of the California Fire Code. 6. One or more of the operations in use or proposed for this building/business requires a Fire Code Operating Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 8. Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 9. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. A suppression system is required to protect, the exhaust duct, the hood, and the grease producing appliances. 11. Commercial cooking suppression systems are required to be electrically supervised (monitored) in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 12. Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Page 050 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 8 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a site specific soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CFC NFPA 13 and the Current RCFPD Ordinance Standard 9-5. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations. Where EV charging stations are provided they must be ADA accessible in accordance to the current edition of the California Building Code. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The Water Quality Management Plan shall show a oil-water separator as a BMP between the fueling islands and the bio-retention system BMP. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Page 055 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 9 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Archibald Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. www.CityofRC.us Page 056 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 10 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 19. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 20. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer, or his designee, for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 25. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. 26. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 1 www.CityofRC.us Page i359 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 11 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 28. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. If required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 29. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 32. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 33. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City Engineer, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Page 1350 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 12 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Page 1i359 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 13 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 39. The preliminary water quality management plan shows a "Bio" detail as 6" perforated PVC outlet drain, this is commonly referred to a bio-retention system with an underdrain. Show the outlet from this system to a storm drain. If the system only uses the outlet riser to outlet the water from the "Bio" system, then this system is a bog which may cause a vector nuisance issue and prior to the approval of the WQMP the applicant coordinate a review by the West Valley Vector and Mosquito Control District for their input on the proposed BMP. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Surveillance cameras (number to be determined prior to final occupancy in coordination with Police Department) shall be installed a combination of interior and exterior to the business, with the intent to capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security cameras. 2. Video recordings of surveillance cameras shall be nothing less than NTSC (National Television System Committee, the NTSC is the analog video color format used to broadcast television signals) standards, with a minimum of 1080p resolution. A minimum of 90 days surveillance video shall be kept and relinquished upon request by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, The Sheriff's Department, or a designated agent. The applicant(s) or on-site manager(s) shall maintain the recording system and cameras in working condition. 3. The applicant or on-site manager(s), shall post a prominent, permanent sign stating, "NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES" in place that is clearly visible to patrons of the premises. The sign shall fit the requirements as set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www.CityofRC.us Page 060 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 14 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The business shall have an alarm system active and monitored by an alarm company who is able to contact law enforcement if a problem occurs within the business. 5. Applicant or on-site manager, shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licenses premises. 6. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. The exterior lighting shall be maintained in working condition by the applicant or on-site property manager. www.CityofRC.us Page 063 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 15 of 15 Arco Gas Stationi ►. ' t w �m I _ UpLI '21FR I • cr: , .wr+•; yip _ F Othlll B1v Chevron1 �•IG' • `h1 — — R1J Y 11R_ YY kLiquor ! o� POW 1 1 � • -- - tt * 'r ft/i'iq • Cam' C t�. ��C'� - Cad::r-aroy���'b f•,+"._ r .. •m , I ;�' ampsh m— y a Str• I•i � rT �- �'•j, .r r �' �, r �v� n;; • Il�r: I�� _. C-Ie Fca=Ct. ' _���•' �+a'.a1ti,9. JE '>;L: ,. `� 11 _ c It �,.��x..•" ,y �, 1i(1 a � ^•, � �� •� � "� ' q .. m �'4' ¢ � �� t s. �.. � Norfolk t.`m 4�, � n•Lezf l)r f V44 .w1 I µ o.,� v _ oo Sl, ' l ti r =~ 1• M ! w. s: 'i o - _ � u �if•rd � � ', �� �f 1ortdav'� ��w ;a�,� � i�l��dr�J I, - O� .p,. � � s' 'r - • � .a._ �.w ��N• ;� 1.e�.�'';.. ,s r`}' •rs } i9.�iig1•i•'s t�gpi �F/�f�NF }.� �,�,,�'1 � ^aa 1.•�3f „� •�++ - �#6 • �� ' rl rMi: liill ,yY.�ti *' iw -a,''I' =k: o'end (approved to ay;ice ,t• D '. be �. A �p ='•- i Plaee IHII���''Ia,. t'F4i+�'\ f" � F,� „� I � , r . • '. � � � i a'i,i►�7j F '`�� ��� . ' F nlrt � Wx--��. ^l�a;�1� -`• �:\ +y,k1;�/fir� '..d�`��rFr- �' �.. �iS�' '!. ���,,,f. •i x y a= � � �tii�l !� �mT,a»k PK• +� ,�,\ � ,7 i•p�N�I•.k v.'- r{ � M1 r m� •� � - N� -.a� 'S"a •:Zl twa� .;�, �' E � m .rum? o''�ti'�'a� •f��`7 F - 'i���'e .� ee �rr. M.r�iw �'�, r• ��a�, Easy Shop Market • 1 it,l, a a �i - - — Arr• o le- JL AL Station76 Gas �S '��. � P�'�� � � I - • ��Y x ?��'� �'� _ S � T('�d •lL'14 n'eyrSt a ' } r • �� U ■ x P e 6rest Pr_ �` -. _ w, All �w r V ,I� 4 I I I ' I '�i � 1. 1 1 1 • • ' t ¢ - • I I � , r --z ;-J Attacht 3 fill '10e L�� I ■I 1 '� .ir. 2G2 0� a Am /I�O�-I e "L� g _ f -,� � ! Imo. '� r� ixi A "'r -° ' f❑z d •�-.r rf __• ,� —� 7,ih+St - .. '.II� 'I Ed 'i' ✓' �' ink i L�'1 � �� . 4 f, I�nor . 0-�_"•rrr-i �i� � � 'll.� yL r F +u {� li .'a 37 a r y F� � -�.� r4zjl�, '4 L. � a �N .• � Yl.f�•�, y arJ^����'��.+ ��{, ry it lF�fr�, _r�- .r 1 i �+�' t� � r Wit, .4 t4- .*!F" �•�`�u. 1.{-A sr 5 3.,lal. k, A � • # i r t ti 1f 1 LL Attachment 4 &'k y a This publication was developed by the Riverside University Health System - Public Health.Thank you to the contributors: Michael Osur, MBA, Miguel Vazquez, AICP, Salomeh Wagaw MPH. A list of partners who helped shaped this checklist can be found on the following page. Suggested Citation: Riverside University Health System - Public Health. Healthy Development Checklist, 2017. Page 296 The Healthy Development Checklist was commissioned by the Riverside University Health System-Public Health and produced by Raimi +Associates. The project was funded with a BEYOND grant from the Western Riverside Council of Governments and produced in collaboration with the San Bernardino Council of Governments. We wish to thank the following organizations and individuals for providing their valuable feedback on this checklist: American Planning Association, California Chapter, Inland Empire Section-John Hildebrand California Baptist University- Marshare Penny ChangeLab Solutions- Eric Calloway City of Coachella- Louis Lopez City of Rancho Cucamonga-John Gillison City ofJurupa Valley- Laura Roughton CityofPalm Desert- Lauri Aylaian & Ryan Stendell City of Riverside-AI Zelinka City ofVictorville- Michael Szarzynski Claremont Graduate School- Kimberly Morones Coachella Valley Association of Governments- LeGrand Velez Health Assessment and Research for Communities- Jenna LeComte-Hinely Lewis-San Antonio Healthy Communities Institute- Angelica Baltazar National Community Renaissance-Alexa Washburn Partners for Better Health- Evette d e Luca Prevention Institute- Rachel Bennett Public Health Alliance-Carla Blackwater San Bernardino County Public Health Department- Corwin Porter,Trudy Raymundo&Scott Rigsby San Bernardino County Land Use Services-Tom Hudson, Karen Watkins, & Linda Mawby San Bernardino Council of Governments -Josh Lee Transportation&Land Management Agency- Steve Weiss Western Riverside County of Governments-Jennifer Ward &Andrea Howard Page 297 The Healthy Development Checklist is intended to help communities across the region incorporate health into everyday life. It is a major step forward in Riverside County's(also known as the Riverside University Health System)continuing drive to build healthy communities. Beginning in 2011, with the adoption of the Healthy Communities Element as part of the County's General Plan and the Healthy Riverside County Resolution, we have continued to encourage the inclusion of health in planning and transportation policy in the County and in its 28 cities.' The Checklist has also garnered the support of regional partners, including the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and Western Riverside Council of Governments. Both of these partners are working with Riverside County to promote a broader use of this Health Development Checklist, including in San Bernardino County. An overarching principle in the Healthy Development Checklist is Equity. Health equity is ensuring that all people have full and equal access to opportunities that enable them to lead healthy lives.This approach to health equity has informed the content and strategies in the Healthy Development Checklist. EEngagement and Empowerment. All of us must work collectively to ensure our communities are engaged in the planning process.We must empower our constituents to be engaged in decision-making by providing accurate, easy to understand and timely information. Engagement and Empowerment of our communities allows for inclusion and a higher sense of buy-in. Quality. We must ensure that our communities are built to the highest quality possible.This means keeping healthy communities as the focus and ensuring that where people live, work, play and learn provides them with opportunities to build health into their everyday life. U Utilization. How we utilize our limited resources is essential to ensure we can serve our growing population. We must build complete streets that encourage active transportation, healthy eating and active living. Increase healthy behaviors. We must build our communities so that there is easy access to parks, open spaces, recreational activities, shopping,jobs and educational opportunities. Healthy behaviors lead to lower morbidity and mortality rates thereby, improving and extending an overall quality of I ife. TTransportation. The provision of active transportation infrastructure for walking, biking and access to transit ensures greater healthy options for our residents. Y Youth. By building healthy communities where youth can thrive and grow with clean air, water, access to healthy foods, parks and active transportation we can increase the opportunities for our children to live a healthier life. ' For additional information on community health data in Riverside County,you can visit SHAPE Riverside County. Page 298 HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST & CRITERIA The design of our communities has a great impact on our health and the well-being of our residents. This checklist provides criteria, empirical evidence, and best practices for new healthy development. Our goal is to encourage developers, city officials, and decision makers to use this tool to help guide the development of neighborhoods that promote physical and mental health, encourage community engagement, and improve quality of life for all. Community members may also find this tool as a useful resource to better understand healthy development practices. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST? The Healthy Development Checklist was developed to provide criteria for healthy development practices in the Inland Empire. It is intended to be used as a tool to judge the overall health performance and supportiveness of new development projects.While not every criterion will apply to every development project, projects should aim to comply with as many of the criteria as possible to promote health through their development project. HOW TO USE THE CHECKLIST? The Healthy Development Checklist is organized into six topical categories: 1) Active Design 2) Connectivity 3) Public Safety 4) Environmental Health 5) Community Cohesion 6) Access to Food, Services, and Jobs A summary checklist is followed by a more detailed catalogue of the checklist. For each checklist question, projects can assess their performance as follows: • "COMPLIES WITH ALL CRITERIA"(if a project meets all criteria) • "COMPLIES WITH SOME CRITERIA"(if the project meets some, but not all of the bulleted criteria) • "DOES NOT COMPLY"(if the project does not meet any of the criteria) • "N/A"(if the criteria does not apply to this project) WHO SHOULD USE THE CHECKLIST? Developers, planning staff, and decision-makers should use the Healthy Development Criteria: • Developers should refer to the criteria and checklist as a guide for the design and planning of a project in the early stages, preferably before submitting an application for development review. • City staff can use the checklist to review development proposals and make recommendations to both developers and decision-makers.The checklist can also be used to inform staff reports and public meetings on projects. • Decision-makers are encouraged to use the completed project checklist to better understand the health outcomes of a proposed project. • Community members and advocates can use the checklist as a resource and tool to guide healthy development in their communities. Checklist I Page 5 Page ZS9 SUMMARY CHECKLIST Complies with Complies with Does not N/A ACTIVE DESIGN all criteria some criteria comply 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project support access to neighborhood amenities (e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community center, caf6, etc.) within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project incorporate attractive, pedestrian-scale exteriors ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ walkability by providing a highly-connected street network? 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ provide all residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? Checklist I Page 6 Page 200 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A PUBLIC SAFETY all criteria some criteria comply 11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project foster injury prevention through the use of traffic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ calming features, such as bulb outs and speed humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and moderate roadway speeds? 12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate safe access to schools within a reasonable walking distance? 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 14. SMOKING. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project incorporate efforts to protect residents from ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ the harmful effects of high volume roads? 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mitigate noise pollution for all residents? 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? COMMUNITY COHESION 19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate spaces that facilitate social engagement? 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate facilities and access to a variety of recreational opportunities for all users? 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate facilities and access to a multi-purpose community space accessible to the public? Checklist I Page 7 Page 205 ies ies ACCESS TO FOOD, JOBS, AND SERVICES Callnc�rliteriaith somelc iteiah compy N/A 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ access to a full-service grocery store (e.g., sells meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables) within reasonable walking distance of all residents? 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens, edible landscaping, or small-scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? 24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ designate space or provide access to a farmer's market within a reasonable walking distance? 25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? 26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ shorter commutes and better access to jobs? 27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project provide future residents with access to health ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ services? 28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ increased access to affordable and high-quality childcare? 29. MIXED-USE. How well does the project integrate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mixed-use development? 30. MIXED HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to a mix of housing options that will allow ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? Checklist I Page 8 Page 2136 DETAILED HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ACTIVE DESIGN 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the project support access to neighborhood ' amenities(e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community center, caf6, etc.)within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? RATIONALE: Neighborhoods that include destinations within reasonable walking distance are linked to increased total physical activity of residents. A"walk shed" radius is a useful measure to delineate the area from which a place is reachable by a short walk, commonly understood as up to one half mile.' An effective circulation system links people to key neighborhood destinations efficiently and safely. CRITERIA: • Review the project for the following features: • Access to one or more existing or planned transit stops(including bus, streetcar, informal transit stop, rapid transit, light or heavy rail stations, commuter rail stations)within a 'z mile walk distance;and • At least two destinations within a %mile walking distance of all or most residents, including , parks, schools, commercial centers, and offices. EVIDENCE: - Congress for New Urbanism.2001. 'Ped Sheds."Transportation Tech Sheet.Retrieved from: • http.//cnu.civicactions.net/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU Ped Sheds.pdf Frumkin,H.and L.Frank,R.Jackson.2004.Urban Sprawl and Public Health:Designing,Planning,and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington,DC:Island Press. Klingerman M.and J.Sallis,S.Ryan,L.Frank,P.Nader.2007. 'Association ofneighborhood design and recreation , environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents."American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4).•274-77. Mouzon,S.2012. "Walk Appeal."Better Cities and Towns.Retrieved from:http.•//bettercities.nednews-opinion/blogs/steve- ' mouzon/18645/walk-appeal 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the project incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? - RATIONALE: The close proximity of parks and recreation services encourages use, physical activity, and mental health benefits for people of all ages. Parks can also be used as spaces for community events and civic engagement. People living within a half mile of a park consider facilities close enough to walk to. - ' For the purposes ofthis Checklist,any references to a"reasonable walking distance"should consider the walk shed as a measure for walkability and also the best applicability to the local community context(e.g., urban, - suburban, rural).While practical influences should always be considered(e.g., safety,shortcuts, etc.), projects • should aim for at least a'/z mile walk distance, but a'/a mile walk distance is preferred. • Active Design I Page 9 - Page 263 ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features.• • Every resident lives within '2 of park or public open space;and • A ratio of at least 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents;and • Joint-use agreements with local school districts or other entities(if necessary, to achieve these park standards.) EVIDENCE: Louv,Richard.2008.Last Child in the Woods.New York:Algonquin Books. Trust for Public Land.2016. 'Parks on the Clock:Why we Believe in the 10-minute walk."Retrieved from: https.//www.tpl.org/blog/why-the-10-minute-walk#5m.0001 boOtOr4t 1 d50von 1 fn8ldyt 18 Westrup,L.2002. "Quimby Act 101:An Abbreviated Overview."California Department of Parks and Recreation.Retrieved from:https.//www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/quimbyl01.pdf 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the project contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? RATIONALE: Walking is positively correlated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Perceptions matter:the extent to which a neighborhood is perceived as walkable is correlated with residents' likelihood of participating in regular physical activity. A quality pedestrian environment also creates a physical and psychological buffer between pedestrians, bikes and cars, in addition to providing shade.A carefully planned built environment can be highly effective in preventing pedestrian injuries. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Pedestrian signals, in-pavement flashing lights, four-way stops, crosswalks, and/or pedestrian overpasses to ensure pedestrian safety and • Gently sloped walks instead of or in addition to steps in public open spaces;and • Barrier-free paths that facilitate access for all users;and ' • Legible signage that minimizes confusion and communicates important wayfinding information to all users(e.g., seniors, deaf, multi-language),-and • • Street trees planted between the vehicle travel way and sidewalk at intervals of no more than 50 feet along at least 60%of the total existing and planned block length within a project and on blocks bordering the project;and • Within ten years, shade from trees or permanent structures over at least 40 0 of the total • length of the existing and planned sidewalks within or bordering the project(measured from the estimated crown diameter). • EVIDENCE: Retting,R.A.,and A. T.McCaln S.A.Ferguson.2003. '4 review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes."American Journal of Public Health 93(9),• 1456-1462. •Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative. 'Best Practices for Complete Streets."Retrieved from. https.//www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/cs/resources/cs-bestpractices-sacramento.pdf U.S. Green Building Council.2016.LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development Retrieved from: • http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version • • Active Design I Page 10 Page 284 , 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? RATIONALE: The presence of a complete sidewalk network is a major determinant of whether or not someone may choose walking for any given trip.Walking is positively correlated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Lack of physical activity is a major factor in Americans' health.The provision of a network that facilitates walking can help bridge this physical activity gap and directly influence measurable health indicators. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Sidewalks on both sides of all new and redeveloped streets;and • Minimum sidewalk width of feet along residential streets and 8 feet along commercial or mixed-use streets;and • Continuous sidewalks across the entire project street network(excepting alleys and service-oriented streets),-and • Incorporation of universal design features to ensure that all users(including those using • wheelchairs, walkers,pushing strollers, and hand carts)can easily travel to neighborhood destinations, including: o Multi-use pathways that are separated from vehicular traffic and that facilitate pedestrian and wheelchair access, o Planting strips on both sides ofall streets without protruding into the path of travel- and ' o Short right-turn radii for major roads and ramps crossing pedestrian rights-of-way. EVIDENCE: • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.2011.A Policy on Geometric Design of High ways and Streets. Washington,DC.-American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Boodlal,L.2003. 'Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings-an informational guide."US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.Retrieved from:http.//www.bikewalk.org/pdfs/sopada fhwa.pdf 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project incorporate attractive, pedestrian-scale exteriors and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? RATIONALE: • Building design greatly affects our sense of comfort while walking, biking, or driving, as well as our connection to a place and our neighbors. Providing opportunities to have frequent face-to-face contact in a neighborhood has been shown to promote social ties among neighbors.Architectural • features such as porches and transparent shop fronts that promote visibility from a building's exterior have been linked to higher levels of perceived social support and lower levels of • psychological distress. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Buildings with primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street or public open spaces;and Active Design I Page 11 Page 289 ' • Buildings that are scaled appropriately to the width of the street to create a pleasant public realm environment(generally using a rule of thumb of at least 1 foot of building height for every 1.5 feet from street centerline to building facade),,and • Surface parking is located behind buildings(or to the side in certain contexts). EVIDENCE: 11 ChangeLab Solutions.(n.d.)'Pedestrian Friendly Code Directory:Eyes on the Street."Retrieved from: ' http.//www.changelabsolutions.org/childhood-obesity/eyes-street Lund,Hollie.2002. Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community."Journal of Planning Education and Research.21 (3):301-312. Speck,J.2012. Walkable City How Downtown can Save America,One Step at a Time.New York:North Point Press. Wekerly, G.2000. 'From Eyes on the Street to Safe Cities."Places 13(l):44-49. 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.How well does the project incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? • RATIONALE: Certain features can be incorporated into the design of buildings that help people increase their physical activity as a part of daily life.Active design strategies include the convenient placement of stairs, building and site design to encourage walking, and the provision of spaces for physical activity. ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Placement of stairs within 25'ofan entrance and before any elevator; • Stair prompts and signage at elevator banks; • Windows&skylights to make enclosed stairs more visible and appealing; • No unnecessary escalators and elevators; • Elimination ofphysical barriers(such as walls, door locks, and poor placement of building elements)that can deter physical activity. EVIDENCE: , Center for Active Design.2010. 'Active Design Guidelines:Promoting Physical Activity and Health In Design."City of New York. • • Active Design Page 12 Page 268 , CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? RATIONALE: Research indicates that children who bike or walk to recreational sites(parks, playgrounds, etc.) use sites more often.The safer it is to bike or walk to play sites,the more likely it is that kids will bike or walk there. Furthermore,trail use is significantly correlated with user proximity, with evidence showing that trails within at least 1/2 mile of every residence is ideal for maximizing access and use.Trails and parks that are well maintained, safe, clean, well-lit, and have facilities, such as restrooms, drinking fountains, and exercise equipment, are used more and contribute to higher physical activity levels among users. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Pedestrian amenities at parks and on trails, including seating, restrooms, signage, lighting, landscaping, shade structure, trash cans and drinking fountains;and • Park design that emphasizes connectivity to other park/trail access points within reasonable walking distance, including complete streets design, close proximity to transit stops, and safe pedestrian and bike routes. EVIDENCE: Kaczynski,A.and K.Henderson.2007. 'Environmental correlates ofphysical activity:a review of evidence aboutparks and • recreation."Leisure Sciences 29(4):315-354. National Center for Environmental Health.2013.Parks and Trails Health lmpactAssessment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Retrieved from:https.•//www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/parks trails/sectionc.htm#1 Shulaker,B.and J.lsacoff, T.Kjer,and K.Hart.2016.Park Design for Physical Activity and Health.San Francisco:Trust for Public Land. 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance walkability by providing a highly-connected street network? RATIONALE: There is ample evidence that greater street connectivity and higher residential density are related to higher total physical activity and lower BMI.Adults are more likely to walk if they live in neighborhoods with high connectivity and intersection density, high population density, and a mix • of land uses. A high intersection density is one of the single most important variables for determining whether a • place will have high enough levels of connectivity to foster increased levels of walking, as well as for increasing transit use and reducing vehicle distance traveled. Grid street patterns that decrease distance between destinations encourage walking and help foster physical activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: Connectivity Page 13 Page 267 , • No cul-de-sacs, courts, and paseos without through access by pedestrians and bicyclists to otherstreets, courts,paseos, orparks; • An internal connectivity of at least 140 motorized/non-motorized intersections per square mile;and • Small, walkable blocks with perimeters no more than 1600 feet long;and • At least one through connection(street, alley, trail/path)of all blocks and the project boundary every 800 feet. Does not apply to blocks or portions of the boundary where ' connections cannot be made due to physical obstacles. EVIDENCE: Frank L,Schmid T,Sallis l Chapman J,Saelens B.2005. "Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form:findings from SMARTRAQ."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28:117-125. Stangl,P.2015 'Block size-based measures ofstreet connectivity:A Critical Assessment and new approach."Urban Design Internationa120(l),- 1-12. U.S. Green Building Council.2016.LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development.Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project provide all residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? RATIONALE: In addition to walking and biking, public transit offers a potential alternative to driving. Public transit improvements can also result in other benefits, including reduced traffic crashes, improved physical fitness and health, energy conservation, increased community livability, increased affordability, and economic development. Urban form, including the presence of compact development and access to public transit,tend to have a positive association with physical activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • At least 50%of dwelling units and nonresidential use entrances have access to existing or planned transit stops(including bus, streetcar, informal transit stop, rapid transit, light or hea vy rail stations, commuter rail stations)within a '/z mile walk distance;and • Compact development and mixed land use that maximizes walkable access to public transit, and • • Transit facilities designed to maximize user comfort while waiting by incorporating shade structures, street furniture and relevant information/signage. EVIDENCE: • En American Public Transportation Association.2009. 'Defining Areas of Influence."(Recommended Practice).Retrieved from: ' http.•//www.apta.com/resources/standards/Documents/APTA%20SUDS-UD-RP-001-09.pdf • Convergence Partnership.2006.Healthy,Equitable Transportation Policy.Retrieved from: http.//www.convergencepartnership.org/sites/default/files/healthtrans fullbook final.PDF Forsyth,A.and L.Smead(Eds.).2015.Mobility,Universal Design,Health,and Place(A Research Brief).Health and Places Initiative.Retrieved from:http.//research.gsd.harvard.edu/hapi/files/2015/11/HAPI ResearchBrief UniversalDesign- • 112315.pdf Litman, T.2010. 'Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits."American Public Transportation Association.Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA_Health Benefits Litman.pdf • Connectivity I Page 14 • Page 268 ' 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? RATIONALE: Good bicycle connectivity and safe bicycle facilities can have dramatic public health benefits. New , bicycling facilities can dramatically lower health care costs. Additionally, communities that support transit use, walking, and bicycling are associated with more physical activity and lower body weights. Key metrics to the success of bicycle networks is trail/bikeway accessibility. Use of trails and bikeways is negatively correlated with distance to the facility. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • On-street bicycle facilities(Class 11 or Class IV)on most streets;and • Class W facilities on limited access roadways with higher rates of speed and larger intersection spacing;and ' • Highly visible or color-coded markings and/or bicycle lane striping on the road surface(or a painted buffer between the bicycle and travel lanes).;and • Where appropriate, 'bicycle boulevards"with narrower travellanes, slower targetspeeds, unique signage, and bicycle prioritization through vehicle barriers or other visual cues. EVIDENCE: Gotsch; T.2011. 'Costs&Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland,Oregon."Journal of Physical Activity&Health 8(1).- 549-558. ' Handy,S.L.2004.Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation,Land Use,and Physical Activity. Washington,DC.-Transportation Research board andInstitutes of Medicine Committee on Physica/Activity,Health Transportation,and Land Use. PucherJ,and J.Dill,and S.Handy.2010. "Infrastructure,programs,and policies to increase bicycling:an international • review."Preventive Medicine 50: 106-25. Ln Connectivity Page 15 , Page 269 ' PUBLIC SAFETY 11. INJURY PREVENTION.How well does the project foster injury prevention through the use of traffic calming features, such as bulb outs and speed humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and moderate roadway speeds? RATIONALE: Vehicle speed is one of the most critical variables that determines traffic collision severity.The use of design features that moderate traffic speeds and increase driver awareness of bicycle and pedestrian activity all help to reduce the occurrence and severity of injury of collisions. This is especially true for those with limited mobility, such as elderly pedestrians and children. Risk of injury is also greater on busier streets and streets with more than two lanes. However, pedestrian safety can be improved through the provision of continuous wide sidewalks, well-marked and signalized crosswalks,traffic controls at intersections; and traffic-calming infrastructure. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Traffic-calming infrastructure, such as speed humps, ,bulb-outs, and chicanes,-and • To the extent possible, neighborhood/local streets have a target speed limit of20 miles per hour and collectors/arterials have a target speed limit of30 miles per hour,-and • All vehicle travel lanes on local streets within the project area are no wider than 10 feet,• collector streets and roads are no wider than 11 feet,-and arterial roads have travel lanes no wider than 12 feet,-and • All two-lane streets have clearly marked space for on-street parking and/or bicycle lanes,- and _ • Outside lane striping to delineate the vehicle travel way from on-street parking, bicycle lanes, or unused shoulders,-and • Grade-separated cycle tracks OR wide parking lanes(up to 10 feet)where physical separation between bicycle lanes and on-street parking is not desirable or possible, such as in areas with high parking turnover. EVIDENCE: Koepsel% T.2002. "Crosswalk markings and the risk ofpedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in olderpedestrians."The Journal of the American Medical Association 288(17):2136-2143. , National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington,DC.-Island Press. Zegeer,C.2001. Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations."Transportation Research • Record(1773):56-68. 12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS.How well does the project incorporate safe access to schools • within reasonable walking distance? • RATIONALE: The implementation of safe routes to school strategies have resulted in significant decreases in the number of child pedestrian deaths and injury rates.Additionally, improved safety for students walking and biking to school also has broader benefits, including reduced transportation costs, increased connectivity between neighborhoods, and improved student alertness. Public Safety I Page 16 Page 234 ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • An attendance,boundary that adheres to these specified distances:most or all students living within a 3/4-mile walking distance forgrades 8 and below, and 1 1/2-mile walking distance forgrades 9 and above, of school building. EVIDENCE: , Boarnet,MG,and CL Anderson,K.Day, T.McMillan,M.Alfonzo.2005. 'Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation:urban form changes and children's active transportation to school."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2): 134-40. National Center for Safe Routes to School.2015.Creating Healthier Generations:A Look at the 10 Years of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program.Retrieved from:http.•//saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS 10YearReport Final pdf U.S. Green Building Council.(n.d)LEED BD+C.•Schools.Access to Quality Transit.Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/credits/schools-new-construction/v4-draft/ltc5 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? RATIONALE: Street lighting improvements can help reduce both crime and people's perceptions of fear. In addition, street lighting can have the effect of increasing activity after dark. , CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Lighting that enhances visibility of streets, alleys, windows, walkways, and bikeways for pedestrians and vehicle traffic;and • Safe pedestrian path zones that align with traffic patterns and generate a sense of welcome at all hours of the day;and • Enough lighting for safety, while ensuring lighting does not produce glare for users, including pedestrians, drivers, or light trespass to neighbors. EVIDENCE: ' IESNA Security Lighting Committee.2003. 'Guideline for Security Lighting for People,Property,and Public Spaces."New York:Illuminating Engineering Society ofAmerica. � Painter,K. 1996. "The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime,Fear,and Pedestrian Street Use,after dark." Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2-3): 193-201. Ln cu Public Safety Page 17 Page 235 � ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH -'AOKING. How well does the project incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? RATIONALE: Each year, smoking causes about one in five deaths in the United States. Smoking continues to be an ongoing health issue and is one of concern in the Inland Empire. Furthermore,there is extensive evidence that indicates second hand smoke, especially in shared spaces, such as multifamily residential buildings, can be a health hazard for non-smokers in adjoining units. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • No smoking in parks and public plazas, and • Signage stating smoking bans in parks and public plazas, and • Restrict smoking in multifamily residential buildings so as to protect tenants from the effects ofsecondhand smoke generated in nearby or adjoining units. EVIDENCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.2014. 'Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking."Smoking and Tobacco Use,Data and Statistics,Fact Sheets.Retrieved from:http.//www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data-statistics/fact sheets/health-effects/effects cig smoking/ 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project incorporate efforts to protect residents from the harmful effects of high volume roads? RATIONALE: Pollutants from cars,trucks and other motor vehicles are found in higher concentrations near major roads. People who live, work or attend school near major roads appear to have an increased incidence and severity of health problems associated with air pollution exposures related to roadway traffic, including higher rates of asthma onset and aggravation, cardiovascular disease, impaired lung development in children, pre-term and low-birthweight infants, childhood leukemia, and premature death. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Near-road landscaping that reduces particle concentrations and noise. Generally, include a context-appropriate vegetation barrier that is at least20 feet and has full coverage(no gaps),-and • Locate homes at least 1,000 away from a high-volume road;and • Install filtration systems for all buildings within 1,000 feet of high-volume road EVIDENCE: California Department of Education.2015.Sustainable Communities and School Planning.Retrieved from: • http.//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf California Environmental Protection Agency.2017.Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Roadways.Retrieved from:haps.//www.arb.ca.gov/ch/rd technical advisor final • Environmental Health I Page 18 Page 238 , 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project mitigate noise pollution for all residents? RATIONALE: Noise pollution can negatively impact the physical and mental health of residents. Unwanted noise may increase due to population growth, street traffic changes, and even mobile technology. Long ' term exposure to excessive noise can lead to stress,fatigue, hearing loss, and loss of productivity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Active rooms, such as kitchens,placed in locations that buffer sounds from roads in rooms where noise is more problematic, such as bedrooms;and • Minimize exposure to noise pollution in outdoor spaces by planting earthen berms with grasses or shrubs;and • Use ofgreen roofs, which can absorb noise and reduce outside sound levels by up to 40- 50 decibels;and • Reduce exposure to noise pollution for building occupants by incorporating acoustically designed walls, double-glazed windows, and well-sealed doors. EVIDENCE: Brophy, V.and JO Lewis.2011.A Green Vitruvius.London:Earthscan. Kryter,K. 1994.The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise:Physiology,Psychology,and Public Health.San Diego: Academic Press. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.(n.d.)'Environmental Health."Healthy People 2020.Retrieved from: https./lwww.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic%nvironmental-health 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.How well does the project mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? RATIONALE: The negative impacts of the built environment disproportionately impact disadvantaged communities, including higher incidences of respiratory disease, cancer, obesity, and developmental diseases. Community design,together with planning decisions, can play a key role in making these communities healthier and mitigating the impacts of existing land use patterns and transportation investments in the region. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Minimize exposure to hazardous contaminants, including contaminated soils,pesticides, contaminated groundwater, and emissions by not siting residential development near or in the path of exposure sites(e.g., bus fleets stations, factories,powerplants, landfills, and areas ofpesticide spraying) 0 • Minimize development of sensitive land uses-defined as schools, hospitals, residences, and elder and childcare facilities-near air pollution sources-including freeways, high volume roads, airplane landing paths, and polluting industrial sites. EVIDENCE: California Department of Education.2015 Sustainable Communities and School Planning.Retrieved from: http.•//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf _ Environmental Health I Page 19 Page 233 1 Environmental Protection Agency.2016. "Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis." Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/ejtg 5 6 16 v5.l.pdf 5rinivasan,5.and L.O Fallon,A.Dearry.2003. 'Creating Healthy Communities,Healthy Homes,Healthy People:Initiating a Research Agenda on the Built Environment and Public Health."American Journal of Public Health 93(9).• 1446-1450. 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? RATIONALE: Poor indoor quality can contribute to chronic disease, including asthma, heart disease, and cancer. Poor ventilation, humidity, and exposure to carbon monoxide can exacerbate negative impacts to health. Most exposure to environmental pollutants occurs by breathing air indoors. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Building materials that are not known to emit harmful toxins;and • Reduce occupant exposure to VOCs by using cabinetry, doors, molding, shelving, and trim materials with low VOCs. Employ caulking, adhesives,paints, varnishes, and other finishes that are free of solvents and V005;and • Reduce occupant exposure to molds by using mold resistant materials in community bathrooms and other water sensitive locations. EVIDENCE: American Lung Association.(n.d). Healthy Air at Home."Retrievedfrom:http.//www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy- air/indoor/at-home/ Environmental Protection Agency.(n.d). "Improving Indoor Air Quality."Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/indoor-air- • quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality CE Environmental Health Page 20 Page 234 , COMMUNITY1 1 19. PASSIVE SPAutb. How well does the project incorporate spaces that facilitate social engagement? RATIONALE: Creating public spaces that promote the engagement of residents and high connectivity of neighborhoods and services have positive impacts on health.The good design of public spaces is important to ensuring not only their use, but the encouragement of socialization and activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Plazas, a central square, dog runs, and bbq areas that encourage social interaction and enhance opportunities for physical activity and • Seating that encourages people to be comfortable in parks and public spaces;and • Design that promotes public gathering and use of open space for activities,places for food, and flexibility for multiple uses, including: o Visible and accessible entrances, spaces, and paths, o Functional structures, o Pedestrian and bicyclist access, o Public art, o Close access to public transit. EVIDENCE: ' Eitler, Thomas W.,E.T.McMahon,and T.C.Thoeng.2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington,D.C.: Urban Land Institute. • Project for Public Spaces.2009. Why Public Spaces Fail.Retrieved from:http://www.pps.org/reference/failedplacefeat/ 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to a ' variety of recreational opportunities for all users? RATIONALE: Having accessible recreation, exercise, or sports facilities in neighborhoods tends to be associated with active recreation.Additionally, research has shown that children are more physically active in preschools that have more available playground equipment and a larger space for outdoor play. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Sports fields, courts, swimming pools, tot lots,putting green, recreational gardening and fitness facilities, including: o Baseball or softball diamonds, soccer fields, an open playgreen, a skate park, basketball, tennis, sand volleyball, and/or practice fields;or o Swimming pools, which may include an adult lap pool and spa, a children's pool, a splash park;or o Equestrian staging area(if appropriate to the context). • Parks that emphasize open space and natural habitat, have minimal development, and are 6 -0 well distributed throughout the site. Park amenities may include: 0 • 0 -0 Community Cohesion I Page 21 Page 239 UU , o Open lawns o Restrooms o Shade structures o Picnic areas o Interpretive areas and interpretive signage •' • Park facilities for users of all ages with different recreational needs, interests and abilities. Seniors and veryyoung children in particular have unique needs. Consider the following , age-specific park infrastructure: o Very young children(age 0-6):tot lots, splash pads o Older children(6-18).•sports fields, courts, skate park o Adults:sports fields,putting green,gardening and fitness facilities, adult lap pool o Senior(age 60+).•gardening and fitness facilities, adult lap pool, trails EVIDENCE: Bauman,A.E.,and F.C.Bull.Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity and Walking in Adults and Children:A Review of the Reviews.London:National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.Retrieved from: http.//www.nice.org.uk/nicemedialpcl`f/wor`d/environmenta/%20corre/ates%2Oof%20%physical%activity%20re vie w.pdf ' Harnik,P.and B. Welle.2011.From Fitness Zones to the Medical Mile:How Urban Park Systems Can Best Promote Health • and Wellness. Trust for Public Land Retrieved from:https.•//www.tpl org/sites/default/files/cloudd tpl org/pubs/ccpe-health- promoting parks-rptpdf Ulrich,R.Evidence Based Environmental Design for Improving Medical Outcomes.Retrieved from:http.//muhc- healing.mcgill.ca/english/Speakers/ulrich p.html 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to a multi- , purpose community space accessible to the public? RATIONALE: Adaptable, multi-purpose community rooms can help foster a sense of social cohesion and offer space for education and health related programming. Education and lifelong learning can improve social well-being and help maintain cognitive function as people age. CRITERIA: , Review the project for the following features: • At least one community space in every community and/or neighborhood-and , • Community room with multi-use spaces, including recreational rooms, auditoriums, • outdoor plazas, and green building features;and • Integration of community rooms with parks, open space facilities, and cultural centers. EVIDENCE: • GJ American Society of Landscape Architects.2014. 'Health Benefits of Nature."Professional Practice.Retrieved from: http.//www.asla.org/healthbene/itsofnature.aspx • Eitler, T.and E.McMahon, T. Thoerig.2013.Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places.Washington DC:Urban Land Institute. Community Cohesion Page 22 Page 246 ' ACCESS TO FOOD, SERVICES, AND JOBS 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate access to a full-service grocery store(e.g., sells meat, dairy,fruits and vegetables)within reasonable walking distance of all residents? RATIONALE: Residents of communities with access to healthy foods have healthier diets. Proximity to supermarkets is associated with lower rates of obesity and the presence of convenience stores is associated with higher rates of obesity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • A neighborhood market within the project design, or • A public, multi-use space that allows for food markets, or • Access to a full-service grocery store within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE • Sallis,J.,and Karen Glanz.2009. Physical Activity and Food Environments:Solutions to the Obesity Epidemic."Milbank Quarterly.87(1): 123-154. Wakefield,J.2004. 'Fighting Obesity Through the Built Environment."Environmental Health Perspectives 112(l 1):A616- A618. 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the project incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens, edible landscaping, or small scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? RATIONALE: Community gardens provide a whole host of community benefits in addition to serving as an additional source of healthy food. Participation in community gardening is associated with higher fruit and vegetable intake,though, and can be an effective strategy at improving access to healthy foods. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Community gardens in neighborhood parks and residential development as part of project design;or • Joint-use agreements with local school districts or other entities(if necessary to ensure access to a school garden),-or • Access to a communitygarden within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Eitler, Thomas W.,ET McMahon,and T.C.Thoerig.2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington,D.C.: Urban Land Institute. Lovell,S.2010. 'Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States."Sustainability2(8).• • 2499-2522. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 23 Page 247 , 24. FARMER'S MARKET.How well does the project designate space or provide access to a farmer's market within reasonable walking distance? RATIONALE: Proximity to farmer's markets has been found to be associated with lower body mass index(BMI) among youth, while density of fast-food and pizza venues has been found to be associated with higher BMI. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Space included for a farmer's market within project design;or • Access ensured to a farmer's market within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Jilcott,S.B.,and S. Wade,J.T.McGuirt, Q. Wu,S.Lazorick,J.B.Moore.2011. The association between the food ' environment and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth.Public Health Nutrition 14(09): 1610-1617. Leadership for Health Communities.2007 Action Strategies Toolkit. Washington,D.C.:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 25. HEALTHY FOOD.How well does the project maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? RATIONALE: Peoples'food choices and their likelihood of being overweight or obese are also influenced by their food environment.A popular measure of healthy and less healthy food availability in a given geographic area-including distance to food retailers, cost of foods, or density of food outlets- is the modified Retail Environment Food Index(mREFI), which is a ratio of fast-food restaurants and convenience stores compared to supermarkets, produce markets, and farmer's markets. Presence of fast food retailers has a negative effect on diets and diet related health outcomes. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: , • Restrict fast food retailers within 'z mile of schools, and • Manage the allowance of fast food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy food retailers to unhealthy food retailers. This could be accomplished by utilizing the Modified Retail Environment Food Index Score. Calculate the mREFI, which is calculated for a census tract as(healthy retailers)/(healthy retailers f unhealthy retailers).Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have 'poor access"to healthy retail food, scores of to 10 to have fair access,"scores above 10 to 25 to have ';good access,"and scores above 25 to have 'high access.' EVIDENCE: Centers for Disease Control.2011. 'Census Tract Level State Maps of the Modified Retail Food Environment Index(mRFEI). Retrieved from:ftp.//ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/dnpao%ensus-tract-level-state-maps-mrfei TAG508.pdf •Moore L VandA VDiez Roux,JANettleton,DRJacobs,M Franco.2009. 'Fast-food consumption,diet quality,and neighborhood exposure to fast food:the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis."American Journal of Epidemiology 170(1): 29-36. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 24 Page 248 , 26. JOBS.How well does the project design promote shorter commutes and better access to jobs? RATIONALE: Jobs-housing balance is an indirect method of estimating how much commuting future residents of the proposed community might have to endure.While some may find driving enjoyable, , commuting is generally a stressful activity that affects one's health and one's social ties to their community. Extended commutes increase stress, with implications for both mental health and familial relationships. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Design includes more housing nearjob-center areas;or • Includes jobs near housing-dense areas;or • Includes affordable housing between job center areas;or • Creates mixed-use projects that include jobs and housing. EVIDENCE: • California Planning Roundtable.2008. 'Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance."Retrieved from: http.//www.cproundtable.org/media/uploads/pub files/CPR-Jobs-Housing.pdf Frank,LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid.2004. 'Obesity Relationships with Community Design,Physical Activity,and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. Freeman,Lance.2002. "The Effects ofSprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties:An Explanatory Analysis':Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1).•69-77. Koslowsky,M.and A.Kluger,M.Reich. 1995. Commuting stress:causes,effects,and methods of coping.New York.•Plenum • Press. 27. HEALTH SERVICES.How well does the project provide future residents with access to health services? RATIONALE: The inability to access public transit poses a significant barrier for low-income patients to access health care services and can result in missed appointments, avoiding care, and deterioration of health conditions. One method to bridging the gaps in healthcare is by creating clinical- • community partnerships, which can be more cost effective and culturally appropriate in addressing preventive care and population health. CRITERIA: • Review the project for the following features: • Access to a clinic or health facility within reasonable walking distance, or • • Include multi-use spaces that could be used as a health center or to provide health services within the project design. EVIDENCE: • Active Living by Design. Clinical-Community Collaboration Case Examples.Retrieved from: http.//activelivingbydesign.org/resources/clinical-community-collaboration-case-examples/ Access to Food, Jobs, and Services Page 25 ' Page 249 ' Hobson,J.and Julie Quiroz-Martinez.2002.Roadblocks to Health:Transportation Barriers to Healthy Communities. Transportation for Healthy Communities Collaborative.Retrieved from: http.//www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/roadblocks to health 2002.pdf 28. CHILDCARE.How well does the project support increased access to affordable and high quality childcare? RATIONALE: Access to quality childcare is vital to a child's early development and also contributes to important economic benefits, including direct and indirect job benefits, increased tax revenues, and a more productive workforce. Communities, cities, and developers are finding unique ways to partner in supporting child care facilities as part of development projects and land use plans. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: ' • Mixed use development included as part ofproject design;or • • Design of flexible, multi-use spaces that could be used as a child care center;or • Access to a child care center within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Hodgson,K.2011.Child care and Sustainable Community Development.(American Planning Association Family Friendly Communities Briefing Papers).Retrieved from:https.//www.planning.org/research/family/briefi'ngpapers/childcare.htm Local Investment in Child Care aINCC).2008. 'Building Child Care Into New Developments:A Guide For Creating Child Care Facilities In Transit-Oriented Developments."Retrieved from:http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/ Uploads/200806241inccdevBRweb.pdf • PolicyLinkand the Marguerite Casey Foundation.2016.High-Quality,Affordable Childcare forAll:Good for Families, • Communities,and the Economy.(Issue Brief Series:The Economic Benefits of Equity).Retrieved from: http.//www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Childcare-for-All-FINAL-05-06-16.pdf 29. MIXED-USE.How well does the project integrate mixed-use development? RATIONALE: There are many different health and wellbeing benefits to living in a mixed-use area.Youths, adults, and seniors residing in neighborhoods with mixed land use typically engage in more total physical activity than those in single-use neighborhoods. Adults are more likely to walk if they live in neighborhoods with high connectivity, high population density, and mixed land use. Additionally, one primary characteristic of a high quality healthy community is mixed land use, • where residents live in proximity to services and amenities, rather than in purely residential environments. • CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Neighborhood-serving uses, such as food markets, libraries, dry cleaning services and ,beauty salons within the project design;and • Retail and service uses on the ground floor to entice pedestrians. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 26 Page 280 , EVIDENCE: Barton,H.and C. Tsourour.2001.Healthy Urban Planning.New York.-Rout/edge. Eitler, T.and E.McMahon, T. Thoerig.2013.Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places.Washington DC:Urban Land Institute. Frank,LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid.2004. Obesity Relationships with Community Design,Physical Actiivty,and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. , Frumkin,H.and L.Frank,R.Jackson.2004. Urban Sprawl and Public Health:Designing,Planning,and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington,DC-Island Press. 30. MIXED-HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to a mix of housing options that will allow all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? RATIONALE: Offering housing that is affordable to local workers is crucial, as a mix of housing that meets a ' diversity of needs and incomes allows diverse professionals to live in the community in which they work.There are ample benefits to having housing that can accommodate local workers, including increased social cohesiveness and a decrease in the amount of driving necessary to support a community. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: , • An inclusionary housing requirement, and • Design of multi-generational housing, and • A wide range of housing for diverse household sizes and types. EVIDENCE: Fraser,J.and R. Chaskin,J Bazuin.2013.Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households. Cityscape:A Journal of Policy Development and Research 15(2):83-100. Urban Land Institute.2003.Mixed Income Housing,Myth and Fact.Retrieved from:hitp.//inclusionaryhousing.ca/wp- content/uploads/sites/2/2010/01/ULI-Mixed-Income-Hsg-2003.pdf . • Access to Food, Jobs, and Services Page 27 Page 285 , Works Cited Active Living by Design. Clinical-Community Collaboration Case Examples. Retrieved from: http.//activelivingbydesign.org/resources/clinical-community-collaboration-case-examples/ American Association of State High way and Transportation Officials. 2011.A Policy on Geometric Design of High ways and Streets. Washington, DC:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. American Lung Association. (n.d). 'Healthy Air at Home."Retrieved from:http.//www.lung.org/our- initiatives/healthy-air/indoor/at-home/ American Public Transportation Association. 2009. 'Defining Areas of Influence."(Recommended Practice). Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/standards/Documents/APTA o20SUDS- UD-RP-001-09.pdf American Society of Landscape Architects. 2014. 'Health Benefits of Nature."Professional Practice. Retrieved from:http.//www.asla.org/healthbenefi'tsofnature.aspx Barton, H. and C. Tsourour. 2001. Healthy Urban Planning. New York:Routledge. Bauman,A. E., and F.C. Bull. Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity and Walking in Adults and Children:A Review of the Reviews. London:National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Retrieved from:http.//www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/word/environmental o20correlates o20of o 201ophysical%acti vity%20re vie w.pdf Boarnet, MG, and CL Anderson, K. Day, T. McMillan, M.Alfonzo. 2005. Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation:urban form changes and children's active transportation to school."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28(2): 134-40. Boodlal, L. 2003. Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings-an informational guide."US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.bikewaIk.org/pdfs/sopada_fhwa.pdf Brophy, V. andJO Lewis. 2011.A Green Vitruvius. London:Earthscan. California Department of Education. 2015. Sustainable Communities and School Planning. Retrieved from:http.//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf California Planning Roundtable. 2008. 'Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance."Retrieved from: http.//www.cproundtable.org/media/uploads/pub files/CPR-Jobs-Housing.pdf Center forActive Design. 2010. 'Active Design Guidelines:Promoting Physical Activity and Health In Design."City of New York. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. 'Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking."Smoking and Tobacco Use, Data and Statistics, Fact Sheets. Retrieved from:http.//www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data-statistics/fact sheets/health-effects/effects cig smoking/ Centers for Disease Control. 2011. 'Census Tract Level State Maps of the Modified Retail Food Environment Index(mRFEI). Retrievedfrom:ftp.//ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/dnpao%ensus- tract-level-state-maps-mrfei TAG508.pdf ChangeLab Solutions. (n.d.)'Pedestrian Friendly Code Directory:Eyes on the Street."Retrieved from: http.//www.changelabsolutions.org/childhood-obesity/eyes-street Works Cited I Page 28 Page 286 Congress for New Urbanism. 2001. Ped Sheds."Transportation Tech Sheet. Retrieved from: http.//cnu.civicactions.net/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU Ped Sheds.pdf Convergence Partnership. 2006. Healthy, Equitable Transportation Policy. Retrieved from: http.//www.convergencepartnership.org/sites/default/files/healthtrans fullbook final.PDF Eitler, Thomas W., E.T. McMahon, and T.C.Thoerig. 2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d). "Improving Indoor Air Quality."Retrieved from: https.'//www.epa.go v/indoor-air-quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Near Roadway Air Pollution and Health. Retrieved from: http.//www3.epa.gov/otaq/nearroadway.htm Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. "Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis."Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016- 06/documents/ejtg 5.6 16 v5.l.pdf Forsyth,A. and L. Smead(Eds.). 2015. Mobility, Universal Design, Health, and Place(A Research Brief). Health and Places Initiative. Retrieved from:http.//research.gsd.harvardedu/hapi/files/2015/ 11/HAPI ResearchBrief UniversalDesign-I 12315.pdf Frank, LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid. 2004. 'Obesity Relationships with Community Design, Physical Activity, and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. Frank L, Schmid T, Sallis J, Chapman J, Saelens B. 2005. "Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form:findings from SMARTRAQ."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28117--125. Fraser, J. and R. Chaskin, J Bazuin. 2013. Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households. Cityscape:A Journal of Policy Development and Research 15(2).•83-100. Freeman, Lance. 2002. "The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties:An Explanatory Analysis". Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1).•69-77. Gotschi, T. 2011. 'Costs&Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon."Journal of Physical Activity&Health 8(l).•549-558. Handy, S. L. 2004. Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Washington, DC.- Transportation Research board and Institutes of Medicine Committee on PhysicalActivity, Health Transportation, and Land Use. Harnik, P. and B. Welle. 2011. From Fitness Zones to the Medical Mile:How Urban Park Systems Can Best Promote Health and Wellness. Trust for Public Land Retrieved from: https.•//www.tpl.org/sites/default/files/cloud.tpl,org/pubs/ccpe-health-promoting-parks-rpt.pdf Hobson, J, and Julie Quiroz-Martinez. 2002. Roadblocks to Health: Transportation Barriers to Healthy Communities. Transportation for Healthy Communities Collaborative. Retrieved from: http.//www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/roadblocks to health 2002.pdf Hodgson, K. 2011. Child care and Sustainable Community Development. (American Planning Association Family Friendly Communities Briefing Papers). Retrieved from: https.//www.planning.org/research/family/briefi'ngpapers/childcare.htm Works Cited I Page 29 Page 283 IESNA Security Lighting Committee. 2003. 'Guideline for Security Lighting for People, Property, and Public Spaces."New York:Illuminating Engineering Society ofAmerica. Jilcott, S. B., and S. Wade, J.T. McGuirt, Q. Wu, S. Lazorick, J.B. Moore. 2011. The association between the food environment and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth. Public Health Nutrition 14(09): 1610-1617. Kaczynski,A. and K. Henderson. 2007. 'Environmental correlates ofphysical activity a review of evidence about parks and recreation."Leisure Sciences 29(4):315-354. Klingerman M. and J. Sallis, S. Ryan, L. Frank, P. Nader. 2007. 'Association of neighborhood design and recreation environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents." American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4):274-77. Koepsel% T. 2002. "Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians."The Journal of the American Medical Association 288(17):2136-2143. Koslowsky, M. and A. Kluger, M. Reich. 1995. Commuting stress:causes, effects, and methods of coping. New York:Plenum Press. Kryter, K. 1994.The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise: Physiology, Psychology, and Public Health. San Diego:Academic Press. Leadership for Health Communities. 2007.Action Strategies Toolkit. Washington, D.C.:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Litman, T. 2010. 'Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits."American Public Transportation Association. Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/ A PTA-Health-Benefits Litman.pdf Local Investment in Child Care(LINCC). 2008. 'Building Child Care Into New Developments:A Guide For Creating Child Care Facilities In Transit-Oriented Developments."Retrieved from:http.•//www. reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/20080624Iinccde vBRweb.pdf Louv, Richard. 2008. Last Child in the Woods. New York:Algonquin Books. Lovell, S. 2010. 'Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States."Sustainability 2(8).•2499-2522. Lund, Hollie. 2002. "Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community."Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21(3).•301-312. Moore L V and A V Diez Roux, JA Nettleton, DR Jacobs, M Franco. 2009. "Fast-food consumption, diet quality, and neighborhood exposure to fast food-the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis." American Journal of Epidemiology 170(1).•29-36. Mouzon, S. 2012. "Walk Appeal."Better Cities and Towns. Retrieved from:http.//bettercities.net/news- opinion/blogs/ste ve-mouzon/18645/walk-appeal National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington, DC- Island Press. National Center for Environmental Health. 2013. Parks and Trails Health Impact Assessment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from: https.•//www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/parks trails/sectionc.htm#1 Works Cited I Page 30 Page 288 National Center for Safe Routes to School. 2015. Creating Healthier Generations:A Look at the 10 Years of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program. Retrieved from: http.//saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS 10YearReport Finalpdf Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.) 'Environmental Health."Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from:https.//www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics- objecti ves/topic%n viron m en tal-h ealth Painter, K. 1996. "The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime, Fear, and Pedestrian Street Use, after dark."Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2-3): 193-201. PolicyLink and the Marguerite Casey Foundation. 2016. High-Quality, Affordable Childcare forAlk Good for Families, Communities, and the Economy. (Issue Brief Series: The Economic Benefits of Equity). Retrieved from:http://www.policylinkorg/sites/default/files/Childcare-for-All-FINAL-05-06- 16.pdf Project for Public Spaces. 2009. Why Public Spaces Fail. Retrieved from:http.//www.pps.org/ reference/failedplacefeat/ Pucher J, and J. Dill, and S. Handy. 2010. "Infrastructure,programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review."Preventive Medicine 50: 106-25. Retting, R.A., and A. T. McCartt, S.A. Ferguson. 2003. 'A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes."American Journal of Public Health 93(9),• 1456-1462. Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative. 'Best Practices for Complete Streets." Retrieved from:https.•//www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/cs/resources/cs- bestpractices-Sacramento.pdf Sallis, J.,and Karen Glanz. 2009. "PhysicalActivity and Food Environments:Solutions to the Obesity Epidemic."Milbank Quarterly. 87(1).• 123-154. Scott M., and D. Cohen, K. Evenson, J. Elder, D. Catellier, JS Ash wood,A. Overton. 2007 "Weekend Schoolyard Accessibility, Physical Activity, and Obesity The Trial ofActivity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG)Study."Preventive Medicine(44), 398-403. Shulaker, B. and J. Isacoff, T. Kjer, and K. Hart. 2016. Park Design for Physical Activity and Health. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. Speck, J. 2012. Walkable City:How Downtown can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: North Point Press. Srinivasan, S. and L. O Fallon,A. Dearry. 2003. 'Creating Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes, Healthy People:Initiating a Research Agenda on the Built Environment and Public Health." American Journal of Public Health 93(9): 1446-1450. Stangl, P. 2015. 'Block size-based measures of street connectivity A Critical Assessment and new approach."Urban Design International20(1),• 1-12. Trust for Public Land 2016. 'Parks on the Clock: Why we Believe in the 10-minute walk."Retrieved from:https.•//www.tpl.org/blog/why-the-l0-minute-walk#sm.0001bo0t0r4t1d50von1fn8ldyt18 Ulrich, R. Evidence Based Environmental Design for Improving Medical Outcomes. Retrieved from: http.//muhc-healing.mcgill.ca/english/Speakers/ulrich p.html Works Cited I Page 31 Page 289 Urban Land Institute. 2003. Mixed Income Housing, Myth and Fact. Retrieved from: http.//inclusionaryhousing.ca/wp-contentluploads/sitesl2l2O 10/0l/UL/-Mixed-Income-Hsg- 2003.pdf U.S. Green Building Council. 2016. LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development. Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version U.S. Green Building Council. (n.d.)LEED BD+C.•Schools.Access to Quality Transit. Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/credits/schools-new-construction/v4-draft/Itc5 Wakefield, J. 2004. Fighting Obesity Through the Built Environment."Environmental Health Perspectives 112(11):A616-A618. Wekerly, G. 2000. From Eyes on the Street to Safe Cities."Places 13(1).•44-49. Westrup, L. 2002. 'Quimby Act 101:An Abbreviated Overview."California Department of Parks and Recreation. Retrieved from:https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/quimbyl0l.pdf Zegeer, C. 2001. 'Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations." Transportation Research Record(1773):56-68. Works Cited I Page 32 Page 286 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G1. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 12, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on May 12, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner Diane Williams. Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar- None D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE - M&A HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire ❑rive and Copley Drive; APNs 0226-572-01 to -10. Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00558. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Dopp asked about the sound wall and giving it any consideration 6 ft. wall level. Vincent Acuna answered yes and working with property owner. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Page 787 All Commissioners concur and are in support of the project. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 D2. LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request to construction a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low(VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09, Hillside Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00973. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Ryochum, resident, lives at 10826 Carriage Drive, asked if HOA is in conformance with debris control. Mena Abdul-Ahad answered yes, it was approved by HOA the dust control. Refer to Applicant. Erick Molinar, Applicant, responded yes, followed typical standard practice. Sherie Garcia, residents, lives at 10827 Carriage Drive, is concerned about their view. Mena Abdul-Ahad mentioned HOA reviewed elevation and meet minimal requirements. Consistent with homes already existing. Ryochum stated HOA not aware and not sure it went through HOA. Sherie Garcia stated it's the first-time hearing about this. Want confirmation it went through to HOA. Mena Abdul-Ahad stated she received letter from applicant on the HOA approval. Commissioners concur there is inconsistency with the plans and renderings. Stating it's an important step_ Requesting to defer action and come back with requested records. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo motioned public hearing will remain open. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 to continue Item D2 to May 26th PC meeting. D3. LOCATED IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE -- W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site -APN: 0225-181-73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, VARIANCE, AND MINOR EXCEPTION File Numbers: SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 2of8 FINAL Page 288 Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Jim Freeman and Bruce Hemlock, Choctaw residents, expressed concerns about wall height. Tabe van der Zwaag stated the wall height is 6 ft. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 26' PC meeting. D4. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception and Tree Removal Permit File Numbers: SUBTT20334, ❑RC2020- 00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Williams requesting creative artwork near bike racks. Jim Manning, Applicant, stated they will work on creating Art design at bike racks even though exempt from Art fee. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Commission Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 261h PC meeting. E. General Business E1. LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS - A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—May 12, 2021 Page 3 of 8 FINAL Page 289 Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). During his presentation, he announced exciting news that the applicant agreed to design the building to Lead Silver Standards. He explained "Lead Silver Standards" shows a dedication and a commitment to environmentally and sustainable development. He said this would be the first Lead Silver Certified 7111 in the State of California, which has been included in the Conditions of Approval. Note: Change to the following Condition of Approvals: #3, #8, #20, 21 (refer to the revised COA for detailed information). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this project. Commissioner Dopp asked regarding concentration service stations, is it a good planning principal to put so many gas stations in a specific part of town. Anne McIntosh commented that the moratorium had an exception for projects that receive a building permit within 6 months of the date that it was adopted. She said there was a recognition that some projects might go forward if they are able to meet the deadline. Commissioner Dopp asked about types of services and buildings are in an area. Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned there are cases that have said there is a legitimate planning purpose and exercise of the City's police power to limit the number of similar types of uses next to each other if the City is concerned that the number of uses will start to compete against each other in such a way the competition will cause closures and that eventually causes blight in the community. It's that blight position caused by too much competition that could potentially be a legitimate planning concern to weigh in on as a Planning Commission. Commissioner Dopp mentioned in the scope of our expectation and drive to create equity in southwest Cucamonga, his concern and considerations about a key parcel of land on a key street looking forward in terms of the General Plan is whether we believe this is the best use for this land from a land use perspective. Sean McPherson responded that staff's recommendation is based on the application in front of them today. He said in terms of broader conversation regarding gas stations and types of uses should be allowed on major corridors, most visible parcels, that broader question is why staff is working towards further analyzing service stations. For example, why there is currently a moratorium to address those broader holistic questions. The applicant has heard the concerns and responded to the Commissions questions and concerns to the point where staff feels we recommend approval of this project. Anne McIntosh stated when we had our overview of the General Plan Update, we talked specifically this being in the middle of a focus area for Cucamonga town center. She said you probably are recalling some of the comments we made about the importance of this neighborhood and desire to have smaller businesses that serve the neighborhood. Creating that walkability connections and opportunities creating employment. She said it's valid to take that into consideration. As this being a key corner for the future of Cucamonga Town Center. It's a valid discussion to have. Matt Burris mentioned whether or not there should be any concerns about over concentration of service station is a legitimate one. Commissioner Dopp asked about conditions and food. He said his understanding is there really is no hard requirement that 7/11 maintain the fresh food options. He asked is this something that Planning entertained or we can, in the back end, in a condition by adding a Healthy RC requirement. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES — May 12, 2021 Page 4 of 8 FINAL Page 790 Nicholas Ghirelli stated he thought the applicant already agreed to do that. Yes, we can condition that. Commissioner Morales asked if there will be bright lights over the gas pumps. Sean McPherson answered no. In conversation with the applicant, the tri-color band surrounding the gas station canopy will not be illuminated. Commissioner Williams stated she is fine with it. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo announced even though this is not a public hearing, he opened for public comments. Grant Ross, Orbis Real Estate Partners, Applicant, is available to answer questions. Commissioner Dopp asked what unique options 7111 will be offering in the type of food they are putting in their store. As well as on a percentage basis. Michelle Moore, 7111 representative, explained their fresh food will consist of fresh fruit, pre-made sandwiches, protein packs, hummus, as well as ready to go items such as fresh eggs, milk, all standard dairy products_ She said it will be a larger grocery set with plenty of product selection. Do not know percentage. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo looked to the Commissioners for deliberation, comments. Commissioner Williams stated the company has shown dedication to make it successful with their decision to eliminate beer and wine. She is in support. Commissioner Morales stated this project proposed at this site does not rise to our expectation and goals for our city in that part of the southwest section. He heard resident's concerns being so close to the schools and homes across the street. Appreciate that they made the change outside with the canopy for the gas pumps, but the bright lights underneath will have an impact on the neighborhood. He said there will be a lot of traffic around the school. He said this would probably work best in another part of our city but for this site will not make the findings for approval and should deny the entitlements. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed the applicant has gone the extra mile in terms of responding to the concerns by staff, Commission, and residents in the area. He said this project is an opportunity to introduce what could be a new model for this type of project. One that is a lot more responsive, new and modern. He said it could bring a new version of this convenience store model to a community that could be a positive addition and should not suffer in comparison with other older approaches to the gas station/convenience store combination. He said looking at this project, this is one we struct a good balance between the needs of the community and expectations for this part of the city. One that could be new and modern in a good way. Commissioner Dopp asked a question regarding Healthy RC initiative and how does the process work. Sean McPherson replied the Healthy RC initiative was incorporated into the current General Plan where staff had analyzed this project up against. In terms of our consideration as to whether or not this would be seen as a benefit to the community. HPCIPC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 5 of 8 FINAL Page 295 John Gillison, City Manager, explained Healthy RC process involves doing an audit of the products being sold. Healthy RC usually works with registered or certified dieticians and it's about moving away from the pre-packaged and some fast food and moving towards healthier choices. He said it's an interactive process and at the end of that, it's trying to make sure they have healthy choices and qualifies as a healthy option. Commissioner Dopp mentioned he does not know how it would look like in terms of a condition. John Gillison explained you could require that they work with Healthy RC and meet the standards applied to other restaurants and/or small grocery stores to ensure that they have sufficient fresh and healthy options available to customers. He said that would be the closer we could come at this point and time. Typically, the process is done with an existing store and they were looking to change out what they were selling. Matt Burris asked if Dopp can elaborate on what his concern and question is in regard to the condition. Commissioner Dopp responded his concern is the whole project. He said what if this model does not work from a Healthy perspective. He is looking for a condition that holds them to it. Nicholas Ghirelli asked Dopp if he is looking for a condition that is going to address the type of products sold at the 7111 or looking for a greater justification to deny the project as a whole because you don't think it's use is appropriate at this location. Commissioner Dopp stated maybe he is foreseeing this project getting through. He said there needs to be an expectation moving forward to make sure 7111 adheres to the principals and values the other Commissioners have expressed. In terms of a commitment to go above and beyond what a traditional convenience store actually does. Matt Burris provided options to the Planning Commissioners that could identify a minimum percentage type of foods or menu with the restaurant and the convenience store have dedicated towards Healthy foods. If you're concern and want to go broader and speak to the design of the site or need additional analysis to better understand what parameters that the project maybe excelling in or not doing so well in with regards to its physical form in the neighborhood and it's context. Commission Dopp stated he does not know if it advances the city towards long term generic goals of creating a world class community. He is not sure this really provides high quality job opportunities for the area. He said there is an expectation and model in the city that one of the bases to construct a mini argument here is to deny the project is it has been reiterated by Staff, Mayor and Council the desire to hold off for higher quality development is a worthwhile goal. Commissioner Dopp said we can do better and over time by committing one of the key vacant lots of land, maybe holding off and seeing overtime assuming the General Plan comes to fruition, we see a tremendous increase in development, activity and quality that 7111 might look out of place. That is his general argument as to why we should deny the project. Requesting Commissioners take into consideration Healthy RC and maybe finding some way to put into resolution some formal requirements moving forward. Thinking long term. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed we have encountered a project that has exposed issues through discussions about this project, he doesn't feel fully equipped to grapple with. The applicant has followed the rules the best they can. He said we are also dealing with conversations taking place at the Council level. We have a project before us that could potentially meet that we could to better, we have been HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 6of8 FINAL Page 298 talking about. He is starting to feel less certain to make a decision aye or nay tonight based on what he has heard. Chairman Guglielmo expressed his excitement for this project, the new 7111 prototype to be used in Rancho Cucamonga. Stating applicant has gone the extra mile listening to our concerns. Offered up a Lead Silver Certification. He worries about the Healthy RC, since there is really no clear outline what that guideline might be. He is open to a discussion, but it may not be spelled out clear enough to where they commit to something but cannot deliver on it. As far as the best use for that land, he thought it might be a multi-tenant industrial park with retail stores in the front but it's just not that big of a site. It could generate in terms of revenue for the City. Talking about revenue per acre. He said it's the best use for that site in the foreseeable future. He is in support and would like to see it move forward. Commissioner Oaxaca stated he is certainly not the one to make a decision. Something we should all discuss as a Commission. Nicholas Ghirelli provided options for the Commissioners explaining they have draft resolutions to approve the project with all the conditions. They can ask staff to consider drafting conditions to address concerns assuring that fresh food is sold in dedicated areas as identified in the floor plan. He said if you try and come up with standards what those foods are, Commission should consider continuing the item since staff will not have those standards in a form of a condition tonight. Options are: approve as is; approve with new conditions; continue it so staff can explore new conditions; or deny the project. Commissioner Williams mentioned she has a 7111 around the corner from where she lives. It's an old traditional 7111 and she has been known to run over there and is amazed to find the item on their shelf. She does not find it unhealthy at all. The fact is the applicant has gone the extra mile is very impressive. She suggested that Healthy RC has guidelines and would be a very simple thing to take their logo to restaurants and have it placed on their menu, "This is recommended by Healthy RC". She feels like she is being asked to judge somebody who has already done everything we asked of them. She didn't think they would come back but they did. She believes the neighbors will enjoy it very much and love having the gas station there. She said we could end up having a nice product in that corner. Matt Burris mentioned that the Healthly Development Checklist has a number of parameters on healthy retailers and food offerings. We do have some information we could reference to help give suggestions, inspiration to address or draft a Condition of Approval to speak to healthy food retailing. If so inclined to have staff look into. Commissioner Morales stated he appreciate all the work staff and applicant and hearing the comments on both sides. He said it's not in the best interest for the city but respects what Commission decides to do tonight. Motion by Chairman Guglielmo, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 3-2. Against: Morales, Dopp. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Adjournment HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—May 12, 2021 Paqe 7 of 8 FINAL Page 293 Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5- 0. Meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, q1 1 46 Eli ab th Thornhill Ex five Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 26, 2021 - HPCIPC Meeting. HPCIPC Regular Meeting MINUTES — May 12, 2021 Page 8 of 8 FINAL Page 294 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING -ITEM G1. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL- RECEIVED JULY 7, 2021 AT 5:03PM From: Melissa Myers<melimyers2013@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 7, 2021 5:03 PM To: Records <Records@cityofrc.us> Subject: Notice of Public Hearing RE: Planning Commission Decision SUBTPM20164 CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you Irecognize the sender and know the content is safe.) Hello Sean, Unfortunately, I am unable to make the meeting tonight due to prior commitments. I would like the following statement to be read to the City Council and Planning Commission Board. Please confirm receipt of this email. Thank you. Melissa Myers Ferrell "Good Evening City Council Members and Planning Commission Board Members: Thank you for your service in making our beautiful city of Rancho Cucamonga a great place to reside. My name is Melissa Myers Ferrell. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the meeting this evening due to prior commitments. I am writing this e-mail to express my concern for the project: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087 - Orbis Real Estate Partner (building of 7-Eleven Convenience Store and Gas Station). I am a resident of the Discovery Village Complex directly across the street from the proposed project. I am concerned if this project is moved forward it will create additional crime, loitering , vandalism (including additional trash near the Discovery Village's Archibald Gate), traffic jams, and lower the value of my home property. I concerned for the following reasons: 1) The 7-Eleven Convenience Store is proposed to stay open 24 hours. This will provide unlimited alcoholic beverages at all times (including late evenings and early mornings). Multiple studies have shown that increased alcoholic beverage consumption within a community increases crime, increases homelessness, and eventually lowers the property value. RC City will be spending more money on law enforcement and resources to address these problems. 2) At the Discovery Village Archibald Gate we have problems with loitering, vandalism, and trash that is dumped during evening hours. Having a convenience store across the street provides easy access to alcoholic beverages (which will increase the loitering and vandalism in our community). This has created a major challenge for our complex because we are constantly spending thousands of dollars to deal with trash removal, cleaning up, and addressing vandalism. Page 299 3) Traffic Jam - My last concern about having a convenience store at that location is the increased traffic. Traffic jams regularly occur when the two local schools (Rancho Cucamonga Middle School and Cucamonga Elementary School) are in session. In the morning, it's virtually impossible to leave our complex because of the traffic from these institutions. Adding a convenience store will only increase the traffic congestion in our community. I asked respectfully that the City Council and Planning Commission Board Members decline this proposal. Thank you for your time and consideration. Melissa Myers Ferrell Homeowner of at Discovery Village 8728 1/2 Pinecrest Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730" Page 286 2021-07-07 -MATERIAL SUBMITTED DURING PUBLIC CO MUNICATIONS FOR ITEM G1 V, I c — q\.,& '�- 6'f'(T I te" /d '� 6 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of gih Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. • Generate more traffic to an already congested area. • Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) • Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ■ Based on Real Estate News "10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ■ #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition,within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address /-0 ?C'A." , Page 287 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. and residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. • Generate more traffic to an already congested area. • Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) ® Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ® Based on Real Estate News"10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ® #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition, within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address '6_7$�� -Pfoe CV05P Piz- C) <e A le-C Y:� 3 q-T7P/2- rtA) - n 0 -7.36 Ok rU "76 7 �67 6 V(yl ct Cf e_r f P/ awe flfma'� (U-(A W al o C, � 701�, P41n6 DO-Z'A L_ '' 0 t M Cyr O 62 < c r C C-) Page 288 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of 91h Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. 0 Generate more traffic to an already congested area. 0 Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ■ Based on Real Estate News "10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ■ #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition, within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address P A Page 808 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, DENYING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application and voted to approve the project by a vote of 3 in favor and 2 against. 7. On May 19, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga voted to appeal the Planning Commission's approval by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against, in order further analyze the project and consider questions which were raised at the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. 8. On July 7, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a public hearing to in appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. After taking testimony from staff, the applicant's representative and the public, the City Council voted to deny the subject Minor Design Review by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against and directed staff to return with resolutions as appropriate at a later meeting. Attachment 2 Page 269 9. On August 4, 2021, the city Council adopted a Resolution denying Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 10. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings on July 7, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject 2.33-acre(101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, would accommodate a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas. Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and Page 270 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 3 f. The construction of buildings less than 10,000 square feet in area on vacant land requires the approval of a Minor Design Review (Development Code Section 17.16.130); and g. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) silver standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and h. Since the May 12,2021 Planning Commission meeting, new facts have been found which cause staff to re-assess its recommendation for the Planning Commission to approve the project.3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the general plan. The project is not consistent with the general plan. Specifically, the project fails to meet Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.1, Goal LU-6 and Policy LU-6.1. General Plan Goal LU-1, requires that the City"Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community- serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents." The project fails to meet this goal as it proposes a 14-pump service station with a convenience store within a census tract where four service stations and eighth convenience stores already exist. Throughout the development process, residents expressed concern about a perceived overconcentration of these uses within this area of the City. Policy LU-1.1 further requires that the City "Protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment." Staff has found that there may be a correlation between increased criminal activity and service station uses. According to data provided by the Sherriff's Department, calls for service at service stations has increased every year since 2016. This includes two homicides reported at service stations in the calendar 2021 year. These findings appear to corroborate concerns expressed by residents throughout the development process. Lastly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, has been identified by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA)as a disadvantaged community. Further,according to City business licenses data, there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 of which only 3 would be considered "healthy" retailers (supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets and warehouse clubs) according to the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist, published by the Riverside University Health System, was developed to provide for healthy development criteria in the Inland Empire. The Healthy Development Checklist identifies four score ranges.Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have"poor access"to healthy retail food, scores between 5 and 10 are considered to have "fair access," scores above 10 are considered to have "high access." This Census Tract's modified Retail Environment Food Index Page 271 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 4 (mREFI) score is 5.6. Permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store would not achieve the intent of either Goal LU-6 or Policy LU-6.1 as it would further exacerbate the imbalance of healthy versus non-healthy retailers within the subject census tract, which is also a disadvantaged community. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district within which the site is located. Development Code Section 17.02.010 establishes the purpose and intent of the Development Code, which is to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and welfare, and more particularly to: 1)implement the goals and objectives of the general plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the city in accordance with such plan; 2) project the physical, social, and economic stability of residential, commercial, industrial and other land uses within the city to assure its orderly and beneficial development; 3) reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate location, use or design of buildings and other improvements; and 4) attain the physical, social and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning. As referenced in Finding (a) above, the project proposes to locate a service station with a convenience store which also includes a fast-food restaurant within '/2 mile of two schools and within a census tract which has been identified as a disadvantaged community. Further,throughout the development process, members of the public have expressed concerns over the existing number of service stations and convenience stores within the neighborhood and associated concerns of crime which may result from these types of uses. Thus, the proposed project fails to meet the objective of the development code as provided in Development code Section 17.02.010. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code. While the project meets all relevant technical development standards for the General Industrial District,the project fails to meet the purpose and intent of the Development Code as provided for in Development Code Section 17.02.010. Further, the project fails to meet performance criteria established within the Healthy Development Checklist. The project fails to meet criteria for certain areas such as "Pedestrian Environment" and "Frontage Design." Regarding Pedestrian Environment, the project proposes a vehicle-oriented use (service station) adjacent to a residential neighborhood and within proximity to two schools. The public improvements offered as part of the project are minimum City standards and do not specifically improve the Pedestrian Environment as called for by the Healthy Development Checklist. Further, introducing such a vehicle-oriented use as a service station across the street from residential uses and within proximity to schools, especially without the inclusion of pedestrian-oriented design features,does not improve the walkability of the area. Rather, such a use would induce additional vehicular traffic which could result in negative impacts to the pedestrian environment. Regarding Frontage Design,While the project provides an appropriately scaled building with the primary parking field located opposite the building from Archibald Avenue, the building provides no primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street. The project does provide one entrance on the north side of the building, but this entrance is oriented towards and provides access to the restaurant's outdoor patio. Staff notes that a primary entrance facing Archibald Avenue had been requested by staff throughout the development review process, but that the Page 272 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 5 applicant neglected to include this element of design as they cited loss-prevention concerns for 7-Eleven. Further,while the project proposes a large, landscaped setback and a private patio for use by patrons of the restaurant, the project provides no usable public open spaces. Thus, the project does not meet the intent of the Checklist regarding Frontage Design. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public, health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. Throughout the development process, and in particular at the July 7 City Council meeting, members of the public have expressed concern and provided testimony citing concerns relative to the number of existing convenience stores and service stations which presently exist within proximity to the subject site. In responding to concerns expressed by members of the public, staff has found that there may be a correlation between increased criminal activity and service station uses.According to data provided by the Sherriff's Department, calls for service at service stations has increased every year since 2016. This includes two homicides reported at service stations in the calendar 2021 year. Lastly, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, has been identified by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as a disadvantaged community. The Healthy Development Checklist, referenced in other findings above, establishes criteria to achieve compliance with Healthy Food objectives. This criterion includes restricting fast-food retailers within '/2 mile of schools and managing the allowance of fast-food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy food retailers to unhealthy foods retailers. The project is site is within '/2 mile of two schools, and according to City business licenses data, there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 of which only 3 would be considered "healthy" retailers (supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets and warehouse clubs) as defined by the Healthy Development Checklist. Thus, permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project which the City disapproves. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the application for Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, Grant Ross, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4t" DAY OF AUGUST 2021. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 273 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 6 ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 274 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087—A REQUEST TO OPERATE A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license. At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request fora determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application and voted to approve the project by a vote of 3 in favor and 2 against. 7. On May 19, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga voted to appeal the Planning Commission's approval by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against, in order further analyze the project and consider questions which were raised at the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. 8. On July 7, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a public hearing to in appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. After taking testimony from staff, the applicant's representative and the public,the City Council voted to deny the subject Conditional Use Permit by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against and directed staff to return with resolutions as appropriate at a later meeting. 9. On August 4, 2021, the City Council adopted a Resolution denying Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. Attachment 3 10. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings on July 7, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject 2.33-acre(101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91" Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9t" Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 9t' Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, would accommodate a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas. Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). The proposed service station proposes operating Page 276 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20-XX CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 3 hours of 24 hours-per-day/7-days perweek.Vehicle access to the fuel islands will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 91h Street. The existing driveway which serves the existing multi-tenant industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 21- 19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store proposes operating hours of 24 hours a day/7 days a week. The restaurant located within the convenience store proposes operating hours from 5:OOA.M. to 10:OOP.M. and proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087; and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) silver standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and j. Since the May 12,2021 Planning Commission meeting, new facts have been found which cause staff to re-assess its recommendation for the Planning Commission to approve the project. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code,general plan,and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The project does not comply with the general plan. Specifically, the project fails to meet Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.1, Goal LU-6 and Policy LU-6.1. General Plan Goal LU-1, requires that the City"Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community- serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents." The project fails to meet this goal as it proposes a 14-pump service station with a convenience store within a census tract where four service stations and eighth convenience stores already exist. Throughout the development process, residents expressed concern about a perceived overconcentration of these uses within this area of the City. Policy LU-1.1 further requires that the City "Protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment." Staff has found that there may be a correlation between increased criminal activity and service station uses.According to data provided by the Sherriff's Department, calls for service at service stations has increased every year since 2016. This includes two homicides reported at service stations in the calendar 2021 year. These findings appear to corroborate concerns Page 277 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20-XX CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 4 expressed by residents throughout the development process, including those members of the public who expressed concerns regarding crime at the July 7 City Council hearing. Lastly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, has been identified by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA)as a disadvantaged community. Further,according to City business licenses data, there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 of which only 3 would be considered "healthy" retailers (supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets and warehouse clubs) according to the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist, published by the Riverside University Health System, was developed to provide for healthy development criteria in the Inland Empire. The Healthy Development Checklist identifies four score ranges.Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have"poor access"to healthy retail food, scores between 5 and 10 are considered to have "fair access," scores above 10 are considered to have "high access." This Census Tract's modified Retail Environment Food Index (mREFI) score is 5.6. Permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store would not achieve the intent of either Goal LU-6 or Policy LU-6.1 as it would further exacerbate the imbalance of healthy versus non-healthy retailers within the subject census tract, which is also a disadvantaged community. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. The project meets all relevant technical development standards. However, the project fails to meet performance criteria established within the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist, published by the Riverside University Health System, was developed to provide for healthy development criteria in the Inland Empire. The project fails to meet criteria for certain areas such as Pedestrian Environment and Frontage Design. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property,or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. Throughout the development process, and in particular at the July 7 City Council meeting, members of the public have expressed concern and provided testimony citing concerns relative to the number of existing convenience stores and service stations which presently exist within proximity to the subject site. In responding to concerns expressed by members of the public, staff has found that there may be a correlation between increased criminal activity and service station uses.According to data provided by the Sherriff's Department, calls for service at service stations has increased every year since 2016. This includes two homicides reported at service stations in the calendar 2021 year. Lastly, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, has been identified by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as a disadvantaged community. The Healthy Development Checklist, referenced in Finding (b)above, establishes criteria to achieve compliance with Healthy Food objectives. This criterion includes restricting fast-food retailers within '/2 mile of schools and Page 278 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20-XX CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 5 managing the allowance of fast-food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy food retailers to unhealthy foods retailers. The project is site is within '/z mile of two schools, and according to City business licenses data,there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 of which only 3 would be considered "healthy" retailers (supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets and warehouse clubs) according to the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist identifies four scores. Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have "poor access" to healthy retail food, scores between 5 and 10 are considered to have "fair access,"scores above 10 are considered to have"high access."This Census Tract's mREFI score is 5.6. Permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store would not comply with the checklist as it would: 1) locate a fast-food retailer within '/z mile of schools; and 2) it would further exacerbate that disparity of healthy and unhealthy retailers within Census Tract 21.05 which has been identified as being within a disadvantaged community. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project which the City disapproves. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b)forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, Grant Ross, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 279 RESOLUTION NO. XX-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.33 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ADDRESSED 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of SUBTPM20164, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license. At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request fora determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application and voted to approve the project by a vote of 3 in favor and 2 against. 7. On May 19, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga voted to appeal the Planning Commission's approval by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against, in order further analyze the project and consider questions which were raised at the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. 8. On July 7, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a public hearing to in appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. After taking testimony from staff, the applicant's representative and the public,the City Council voted to deny the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review related to the application but approve the subject Tentative Parcel Map by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against and directed staff to return with resolutions as appropriate at a later meeting. Atta pals M e n t 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 2 9. On August 4, 2021, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 subject to certain conditions of approval. 10. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on July 7, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern portion of the site is largely vacant while the southern portion is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the gth Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres. Parcel 1 will remain vacant, and Parcel 2 will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District Page 281 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 3 e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general plan and specific plans. The General Plan designates the project site as General Industrial which permits the widest possible range of light and medium industrial, as well as limited commercial, activity.The proposed project is for the subdivision of the site into two parcels. No physical changes are being proposed to the site. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project proposes no physical changes to the site. Any necessary public improvements (i.e. installation of public street trees), will be required to meet all city standards; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. No physical changes are being proposed to the site; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The proposed project is for the subdivision of the project site into two parcels. No building or construction is proposed in conjunction with this tentative parcel map. No environmental impacts are expected. e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems.The proposed project is only for the subdivision of the project site into two parcels. No building or construction is proposed in conjunction with this tentative parcel map. No health impacts are expected. f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions, as the project includes the subdivision of an existing parcel into two new parcels where no physical changes occur. The City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164,subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the Page 282 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 4 adoption of this Resolution, and (b)forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, Grant Ross, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 283 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTAT� E PARCEL MAP NO. 20164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS IAH tlLll6 y, APN:0209-021-17 APN:0209-021-16 *�f ZONING:INDUSTRIAL ZONING:INDUSTRIAL APN:0209-041-01 1U's ZONING:MEDIUM NINTH STREET OWNER N89'50'00"W n Q 280 NEWPORTPEC O CENR REDRIVE,SUTIE 240 NE WORT BEACH,CA 92660 APN:0209-054-79 S89'50'00"E 219.47' - APPLICANT ZONING:MEDIUM i 1 EX.R/W Sfi 4S-C.la EiS,R7W CRISIS REAL 7 280 NEWPORTSCENTERADRIVER SUITE 240 S44T8'30'E 27,95' RKMAS'L60S aff PACE 602,ON J-3(20) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 PH.949-330-7562 MAP PREPARER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 1100 W.TOWN AND COUNTRY,SUITE 700 ORANGE,CA 92868 APN:0209-054-80 BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 ZONING:MEDIUM (714 786-6275 W TOPOGRAPHY ADKAN ENGINEERS 2 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 ] TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 Q SITE ADDRESS VARIES 44A6' M78 ARCHIBALD AVENUE 3 PARCEL 1 RANCHO CUGPANDA,CA 91730 �.gg qC ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS PARCEL 1 0209-032-35-0000 PARCEL MAP 8653 " ZONING/LAND USE PMB 90/21-22 3 z e ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL z; LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARCEL 2 ADJACENT LAND USE EX.R PARCEL MAP 8653 n APN:0209-054-82 EX.R/14 o NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PMB 90/21-22 ZONING:MEDIUM SOUTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL EAST:MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) WEST:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONING:INDUSTRIAL UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SEWER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT GAS:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PROP,It J TELEPHONE:AT&T I 1 CABLE:CHARTER CABLE N89'49'29'W 236.18' - m SCHOOL:CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT Z EASEMENT NOTES U 1. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT 3 a m Q RECORDED JANUARY 17,1885 IN BOOK 39 PARCEL 1 m ,yo f Q OF DEEDS,PAGE 484, PARCEL MAP 1528 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PMB 14/56 3 PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED PARCEL 2 \M DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE APN:0209-032-34 �.g5 AC 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q3 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND ZONING:INDUSTRIAL \b APN:0209-054-78 INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT ZONING:MEDIUM RECORDED APRIL 26,1977 AS BON 9164, PAGE ENT OR D OF O RECORDS. EX.R �4 EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL 1 I 4 MAP N0.8653 RECORDED OCTOBE 04,1984 ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF N89'50'00°W 235.06' PARCEL MAPS PARCEL 2 PROJECT NOTES PARCEL MAP 1528 1. THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN PMB 14/56 602NARDINO)RIVERSIDE COUNTIES(PAGE 2. FEMA FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE X AND APN:D2D9-032-37 ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO, 06071C8630J. ZONING: INDUSTRIAL 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS:2 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:2.329.ACRES 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS APN: )209-054-76 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.8653 AS PER ZONING:MEDIUM NORTH PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MAP PREPARATION DATE 0 20 40 80 7/23/2021 MAP REVISION DATE SCPLE: 1"=40' W.O. 19412— DES. 62020 Klmley»>Horn TENTATI\f?c-vge(284v1AP 20164 L" 1 CHECKED: SA 765 111E CITY DRIVE.SUITE 100.ORANGE,CA 92868 OF SHEETS Pw cK REF: Hn°Ne na-9J9-1m° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °N�G'N0' REVISIONS OATS BY FB. WMV KMEEY-HORN O]M Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM19948 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map 19948 Location: 9007 ARROW RTE - 020901219-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to approval of the final map, developer shall provide evidence of the recordation of a reciprocal parking, access, and maintenance agreement between all parcels on the parcel map. 2. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) for all property to be subdivided. The CC&Rs shall form a Property Owners Association and shall include the following provisions relating to the site's uniform sign program: a) The existing uniform sign program (Uniform Sign Program # 50) governing the property shall remain in effect after approval of the final map; and b) the property owners association shall have the sole authority to apply for a modification to the existing uniform sign program. 3. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Property Owners Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. Printed:7/22/2021 www.CityofRC.us Attain e n t 6 Project#: SUBTPM19948 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map 19948 Location: 9007 ARROW RTE - 020901219-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department access and possibly for private fire protection underground piping and fire hydrants are required to be recorded between property owners favoring the RCFPD. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided and the common areas are being shared by multiple owners. Please submit a proposed perpetual access and fire protection reciprocal maintenance agreement document favoring the RCFPD. The document shall grant irrevocable use and maintenance remedies to the Fire District and shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. Fire Construction Services (FCS) shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The submittal for the proposed document shall include the site plan, the title report, legal description and the Assessor's parcel number. Upon approval by FCS the agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office. FCS has a template available to facilitate the process. If you have any questions and/or to obtain the electronic template please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner at (909) 774-4209 or at moises.eskenazi@cityofrc.us e www.CityofRC.us Pa 286 Printed:7/22/2021 g Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: A Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage Facility Located at 9910 6th Street in an Existing Industrial Building within the General Industrial (GI) District—APN:0209- 211-42 and 43 (DRC2021-00213). This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-085) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 through the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, Inc., applied for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 to operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility at a 4.55 acre site which is improved with an existing 8,888 square foot industrial building and large asphalt area within the General Industrial (GI) District at 9910 6th Street. The Planning Director denied Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 on May 4, 2021, and the applicant appealed the decision to the Planning Commission on May 12, 2021, within the 10-day appeal period under case file No. DRC2021-00159. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.14.070, the appeal authority of Planning Director decisions is the Planning Commission. Accordingly, a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider the appeal of the Planning Director's denial was held on June 9, 2021, at which point the Planning Commission voted (4 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 absent), to uphold the Planning Director's decision and deny the appeal. The applicant appealed the Planning Commission's decision on June 16, 2021, within the 10-day period under case file No. DRC2021-00213. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.14.070, the appeal authority for Planning Commission decisions is the City Council. For a full background and project description, please reference the Director's denial letter dated May 4, 2021, and the Planning Commission staff report dated June 9, 2021. These reports and related attachments are included with this staff report as Attachment 1. Page 287 ANALYSIS: As noted in the staff report prepared for the June 9 Planning Commission hearing, when analyzing this project, staff primarily considered two topic areas: zoning/impacts to surrounding properties and General Plan consistency. Zoning/impacts to surround properties: Pursuant to Development Code Section Table 17.30.030- 1, Auto and Vehicle Storage is a conditionally permitted use in the General Industrial GI) zone. There are locations in this zoning designation where Auto and Vehicle Storage might be considered more appropriate, such as the Southeast Industrial Quadrant(SEIQ)of the city. Within the SEIQ, for example, an Auto and Vehicle Storage use might complement other surrounding uses which in the SEIQ typically comprise a variety of large-scale distribution and logistics facilities, heavy industrial uses, public facilities, etc. For reference, staff has conducted an informal citywide survey of existing Auto and Vehicle Storage businesses which appear to have similar operational characteristics (i.e. fleet, tractor, and trailer storage), and found that there are six which currently exist within the city. Of these six, five are located within the SEIQ. On the other hand, there are locations within the GI District where Auto and Vehicle Storage is detrimental to the neighborhood in which it is located. The industrial neighborhood on 6th Street, for example, particularly this block of 6th Street, is one of those neighborhoods where an Auto and Vehicle Storage use raises compatibility concerns. Other uses within the vicinity of the project site include, but are not limited to, a variety of neighborhood-serving uses such as a church, restaurants, personal service businesses such as barber shops and massage businesses and professional offices. A single-family residential neighborhood is located approximately 1,400 feet to the west. Notably, immediately to the east of the project site is a brewery (Rowdy's Brewery) with a large outdoor patio. The patio fronts the driveway of the proposed project and would therefore be exposed to the truck traffic entering and existing the facility. The proposed project is expected to generate 18 truck trips every day. This is a good example of how certain locations within the GI District could be detrimental as Rowdy's Brewery depends on customers to frequent their business in person to consume food and drinks. Locating the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use immediately next to uses such as these create conflicts as industrial uses such as Auto and Vehicle Storage are known to create adverse impacts, such as air pollution emissions and noise. Notably, no air quality or noise studies were prepared for this project. Thus, these impacts have not been fully evaluated. General Plan Consistency: The Director's denial letter also cited certain goals and policies from the Economic Development Chapter of the General Plan. In order to approve a CUP, the approving authority must find that the proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the General Plan. As discussed in the Director's denial letter for this project, as well as the staff report prepared for the June 9, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the General Plan established certain goals and policies, namely Goal ED-1 and Policy ED-1.3, which the project fails to meet. Further, regarding zoning, staff notes that the subject project site previously housed a recycling facility. As was discussed in the Director's denial letter, the General Plan provides goals and policies, such as Policy ED-1.3, which promote the establishment of "innovative industries," including those uses which incorporate and promote green technology, at redeveloped industrial sites. Considering the dynamic context of the existing neighborhood along this block of 6th Street, staff views the turnover of the former recycling facility as an opportunity to facilitate the development of new, innovative businesses as intended by Policy ED-1.3. Further, trucks not only don't contribute to clean industrial, they add to potential environmental impacts, which is contrary to green technology uses envisioned by the General Plan. Page 2 Page 288 June 9, 2021 Planning Commission Public Hearing: At the June 9, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission raised a number of concerns with the project including but not limited to: incompatibility with surrounding uses within the subject 6th Street neighborhood and how the project fails to meet General Plan Goal LU-6 relative to Southwest Cucamonga in particular. General Plan Goal LU-6 "promotes the stability of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods and contains Policy LU-6.1, which requires that the City "continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Further, one commissioner even commented on the City Council's efforts to consider Rancho Cucamonga as a "world-class city," emphasizing the need for the Commission to carefully evaluate those projects which are not consistent with that goal. At the June 9, 2021 meeting, commissioners also identified a discrepancy in the number of jobs anticipated to be created by the proposed use. Previously, the applicant's business description included as an exhibit to the June 9 Planning Commission staff report noted that the"total number of staff on site in shifts (is) expected to range from 25 to 30 with the largest shift having 12 to 15 staff present." More importantly, the business operations also notes that a "typical day involves 21 on site employees between 6 AM to 6 PM." This is important because the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project appears to base the number of anticipated vehicle trips, including 18 truck trips per day, on the 21 on site employees. However, in a letter dated June 2, 2021, provided to staff in anticipation of the June 9 meeting, the applicant's legal representative stated that the "project will directly employ 97 individuals..." with no clarification as to how this number relates to the number of employees previously noted by the applicant. Staff notes that the Traffic Impact Assessment does not account for this increased number of employees. Further, staff notes that this increased number of employees may have an adverse impact on parking. In the case of this project, staff utilized parking standards for warehouse/storage uses at a ratio of 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet (for the first 20,000 square feet of building area) pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050. This ratio was used as the development code does not provide a specific parking ratio for Auto and Vehicle Storage, and as the applicant's business description notes that the business would also include temporary storage of materials within the existing building which would be transferred between trucks. As noted in the Planning Director's denial letter, the use requires 9 parking spaces, whereas the site provide 11 parking spaces. Staff is concerned that the number of parking stalls provided will not be able to accommodate up to 97 employees as it is not clear how many of these 97 employees will be on site, will be present during various shifts, or will be truck drivers who will be off site. Applicant's Appeal to City Council (DRC2021-00213): The applicant's attorney has provided a letter explaining why they believe the Planning Commission (and previously the Planning Director), erred in their determination of denial of the subject Conditional Use Permit. This letter has been included with this staff report as Attachment B. the letter raises the following arguments in response to the Planning Commission's determination of denial: A. Claims that the "real reason" for denial was an attempt to unlawfully apply a "retroactive" application of code provisions not yet in effect. B. Claims that the decision to "unfairly" target auto and vehicle storage is not supported by substantial evidence. Staff notes that the applicant's appeal letter also cites previous arguments which were provided to the Planning Commission on June 9, but which are summarized in brief in the appeal letter addressed to the City Council and which was submitted to staff on June 16, 2021. Page 3 Page 289 The applicant's attorney argues that the "Planning Director's decision was based on a premature application of the Development Code Amendments proposed under Ordinance 982 before they were even introduced at a public hearing." The applicant's attorney cites Development Code Section 17.02.020(F) and 17.02.020(F)(1), which provides, in short, that pending applications "...will be processed according to the regulations in effect when the application was deemed complete." For the Council's information, Ordinance 982 was adopted on July 7, 2021, is set to become effective on August 20, 2021 and will prohibit Auto and Vehicle Storage, except when such use is an on- or off-site accessory use to any manufacturing use upon issuance of a minor use permit. Staff notes that the subject application was deemed complete by Planning staff on February 18, 2021. As such, staff has applied the development standards and findings which were in effect prior to Ordinance 982, as clearly referenced in the Planning Director's denial letter and Planning Commission staff report. Specifically, staff notes that the Planning Director's denial, as well as the Planning Commission's decision to affirm the Director's decision and also deny the project, were based on the inability to make the required findings for Conditional Use Permits established in Development Code Section 17.16.120 which were in effect prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982. Staff clearly applied the development code standards, and findings, which were in effect at the time of the application being deemed complete. If staff had applied the new use table outlined in Ordinance No. 982, then it would have been forced to reach the conclusion that the CUP must be denied because the proposed use is not conditionally permitted. Neither the Planning Director nor Planning Commission made such a finding. Notably, among these required findings provided in Section 17.16.120 is the finding that the project must comply with the general plan. Staff has provided evidence which demonstrates that the subject project does not comply with the general plan, specifically Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal LU-1 and Policy LU-1.1 of the 2010 General Plan. And, importantly, the project would result in real physical impacts to surrounding uses, including to diners using the outdoor patio at Rowdy's Brewery. As a result, the project would be "detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located." FISCAL IMPACT: Staff notes that no Fiscal Impact Analysis was prepared for this project as staff recommended denial of the project for the reasons discussed in this staff report. In the event that the City Council desires to approve the project, or if they feel additional research is warranted, a Fiscal Impact Analysis may be prepared at that time. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: As noted in the Planning Commission staff report dated June 9, 2021, and in addition to the proposed use not following the General Plan, the project also fails to meet the following City Council Core Values: • Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all. • Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. • Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. • Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. • Equitable prosperity for all. • Continuous improvement ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — May 4, 2021 Director Letter and June 9 Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 Page 290 related and Attachments Attachment 2 —Applicant's Planning Commission Appeal Letter Attachment 3— Resolution of Denial of Appeal to the City Council Page 5 Page 291 01 MAREWAS %7,Wm IF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mw- DATE: June 9, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 9910 6T" STREET - CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL DRC2021-00159 — BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES —An appeal of the Planning Director's denial of a request for a conditional use permit to operate an auto and vehicle storage facility located at 9910 6th Street in an existing industrial building within the General Industrial (GI) District— APN:0209-211-42 and 43. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project which is disapproved by the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the Planning Director's decision to deny Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant, Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, Inc., applied for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 to operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility at a 4.55 acre site which is improved with an existing 8,888 square foot industrial building and large asphalt area within the General Industrial (GI) District at 9910 61h Street. The Planning Director denied Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 on May 4, 2021, and the denial was appealed on May 12, 2021, within the 10-day appeal period. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.74.070, the appeal authority for Planning Director decisions is the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: Upon denying the project, the Planning Director determined that certain findings as established in Development Code Section 17.16.120 could not be made in the affirmative. For a complete description of the proposed use, reference the Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 denial letter dated May 4, 2021 which is included with this staff report as Exhibit A. PROJECT ANALYSIS: When analyzing this project, staff considered two topic areas: zoning and economic development, which are relevant to the implementation of the City's land use objectives and General Plan goals and policies. Zoning: Pursuant to Development Code Section Table 17.30.030-1, Auto and Vehicle Storage is a conditionally permitted use in the General Industrial GI) zone. There are locations in this zoning designation where Auto and vehicle Storage might be appropriate, such as the Southeast Industrial Quadrant (SEIQ) of the City. Within the SEIQ, for example, an Auto and Vehicle Storage use might complement other surrounding uses, which in the Atfi m e n t 1 SEIQ typically comprise a variety of large-scale distribution and logistics facilities, heavy industrial uses, public utility faculties, etc. Staff has conducted an informal citywide survey of existing Auto and Vehicle Storage businesses which appear to have similar operational characteristics (i.e. fleet, tractor, and trailer storage), and found that there are six which currently exist within the City. Of these six, five are located within the SEIQ. On the other hand, there are locations within the GI District where Auto and Vehicle Storage is detrimental to the neighborhood in which it is located. The industrial neighborhood on 6th Street, for example, particularly this block of 6th Street, is one of those neighborhoods where Auto and Vehicle Storage use raises compatibility concerns. This block of 6th Street is comprised of a variety of industrial and commercial businesses including light and medium manufacturing, office, and specialized auto repair. A single-family residential neighborhood is located approximately 1,400 feet to the west. Notably, and immediately to the east of the project site, is an industrial park which contains a brewery (Rowdy's Brewery). This is a good example of how certain locations within the GI District could be detrimental as Rowdy's Brewery depends on customers to frequent their business in person to consume food and drinks. Locating the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use immediately next to uses such as these create conflicts as industrial uses such as Auto and Vehicle Storage are known to create adverse impacts, such as reduced air quality and noise. Further, regarding zoning, staff notes that the subject project site previously housed a recycling facility. As was discussed in the Director's denial letter, the General Plan provides goals and policies which promote the establishment of"innovative industries," including those uses which incorporate and promote green technology. Considering the dynamic context of the existing neighborhood along this block of 6th Street, staff views the turn- over of the former recycling facility as an opportunity to facilitate the development of new, innovative businesses. Further, trucks not only don't contribute to clean industrial, they add to potential environmental impacts, which is contrary to green technology uses envisioned by the General Plan. Economic Development: The Director's denial letter also cited certain goals and policies from the Economic Development Chapter of the General Plan. To be clear, Economic Development does not pertain to fiscal performance alone. Rather, economic development goals contained within the General Plan must be met through zoning and land use decisions. As discussed in the Director's denial letter for this project, the General Plan established certain goals and policies, namely Goal ED-1 and Policy ED-1.3, which are discussed more below. Applicant's Appeal: In support of this appeal, the applicant's attorney has provided a letter explaining why he believes the Planning Director's determination of denial of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 was incorrect. The letter has been included with this staff report as Exhibit B. The letter raises the following arguments in response to the Planning Director's determination of denial: A. The Planning Director's General Plan Consistency Analysis is beyond the scope of the findings under development code Section 17.16.120 B. The proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage Use would not be detrimental to public interest, health, safety or welfare or cause any "material injury"; purely economic considerations are not relevant. C. The Planning Director's denial is arbitrary and capricious, lacks evidentiary support and fails to follow the procedures required by law. Staff disagrees with the arguments raised in the applicant's letter, but in an abundance of caution has further refined and expanded upon the rationale for recommending denial of this application in order to respond to the applicant's concerns. Staff feels that the project fails to meet certain goals and policies established in the General Plan, primarily Goal ED-1 and Policy ED-1.3, and therefore does not comply with the General Plan. As noted in the Director's denial letter, Goal ED-1 requires that the City "achieve and maintain a diverse and sustainable economic base." This Page 2 PIRggE293 goal further provides Policy ED-1.3 which "encourage(s) the re-use of vacant warehousing facilities and other sites in Industrial zoned areas to attract new, innovative industries, particularly green technology." The General Plan continues by noting that while the exact type of business considered to be "green tech" might change over time, "...the City will continue to support the development of new buildings and reuse of existing buildings to accommodate the evolving spatial needs of innovative firms." The applicant proposes the re-use of a 4.55-acre site within the GI District for Auto and Vehicle Storage which had previously been used as a recycling center. The applicant proposes to re-use the 4.55-acre site and the existing industrial building located on-site to accommodate the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use. The re- use of the project site in such a manner does not meet the goals provided above, and thus, does not comply with the General Plan as it fails to "attract new, innovative industries," let alone one that focuses on green technology. While the General Plan does not provide a definition for what constitutes an "innovative industry," staff notes that parcels of a similar size and which are located within the same zone within proximity to the project site comprise industrial parks which house a variety of tenants including, but not limited to, breweries, light manufacturing business, offices and specialized auto repair. Notably, these uses are permitted by right within the GI zoning district. Other uses which are permitted by right within the GI District, and which may be considered innovative, include but are not limited to, recording studios, small equipment maintenance and repair, a variety of medical services, and custom, light and medium manufacturing, etc. In referencing the Development Code, Table 17.26.020-1 ("Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts"), defines the GI zoning district as follows: General Industrial. Designates areas for the widest possible range of light and medium industrial activity, including manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses. The district may be employed as a buffer between nonindustrial uses and heavy industrial uses. Though Development Code Section Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements By Base Zoning District) provide that Auto Vehicle Storage in the GI District is a conditionally permitted use, the Development Code makes clear that the GI District is intended to facilitate "the widest possible range" of industrial activity, which according to the Development Code's Allowed Use Table, could include non-industrial commercial uses, as well. Further, and as already discussed, properties of this size within the GI District can accommodate a range of innovative uses, and which could facilitate green technology uses, as the General Plan intends. Therefore, and to state again, allowing the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage facility to locate at the subject site in perpetuity does not comply with General Plan goals and policies. Approving such a project would directly prevent the encouragement of diverse employment-generating land uses that are clean and modern, and that incorporate green technology. Allowing the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use is inconsistent with the General Plan's direction to use the vacant industrial site for new innovative industries which could otherwise locate at the subject site if it were redeveloped similar to other parcels of approximately the same size and zoning designation. Furthermore, Auto and Vehicle Storage is not considered a green technology for purposes of re-using a vacant industrial site. Additional General Plan Goals and Policies: Beyond the project failing to meet the above referenced General Plan goals and policies, which were discussed in the Director's denial letter, staff believes that the project also fails to meet the following additional General Plan goals and policies of the Land Use Chapter of the General Plan: • Goal LU-1. Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of residents. Page 3 PiRggE294 o Policy LU-1.1: Protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment. ■ Discussion: "Rancho Cucamonga has many stable high-quality residential neighborhoods that constitute a significant part of the City's character. Without land use controls, new development could encroach on these areas and diminish the quality of life in these neighborhoods." The proposed Auto and Vehicle storage meets no discernable community need for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, which is contrary to Goal LU-1. As previously discussed, and pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements By Base Zoning District), the Development Code permits a variety of uses which meet community needs including restaurants, broadcast and recording studios, garden centers and/or plant nurseries, home improvement supply stores, etc. Staff notes that Table 17.30.030-1 also permits other community serving uses upon approval of a CUP, such as indoor entertainment, indoor fitness and sports facilities and childcare facilities, etc. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would meet no such community need and developing the entire site with the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use as proposed by the applicant would prevent this property from being developed with a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses which can occur on a parcel of this size and within this zone as evidenced by other parcels within the vicinity that have been developed with various other community serving uses which meet the needs of residents. • Goal LU-6: Promote the stability of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods. Policy LU-6.1: Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs. ■ Discussion: "The residential neighborhoods in southwest Rancho Cucamonga are not well served by any commercial shopping centers. The closest shopping centers are located south in neighboring Ontario or in the Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue areas. However, there are several community centers in southwest Rancho Cucamonga, including the Northtown Community Center (affiliated with the Northtown Housing Development Corporation) and the RC Family Resource Center, that provide community services to area residents." While Policy LU-6.1 discusses commercial shopping centers, staff notes that southwest Rancho Cucamonga has been historically underserved such as restaurants and other neighborhood serving uses. The development pattern of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga can be characterized by industrial uses interspersed with existing single-family residential neighborhoods. This mix of incompatible land uses within proximity to each other can diminish the quality of life within residential neighborhoods. The proposed Auto and Vehicle storage meets no discernable community need for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, which is contrary to Goal LU-6. As previously discussed, and pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements By Base Zoning District), the Development Code permits a variety of uses which may be considered to meet community needs including restaurants, broadcast and recording studios, garden centers and/or plant nurseries, and home improvement supply stores, etc. Staff notes that Table 17.30.030-1 also permits other community serving uses upon approval of a CUP, such as indoor entertainment, indoor fitness and sports facilities and childcare facilities, etc. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would meet no such community need and developing the entire site with the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use as proposed by the applicant would prevent this property from being developed similar to those surrounding parcels which are similarly situated and which are within the same zone which have been Page 4 PIRggE295 found house a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses for the benefit of the residents, particularly within southwest Rancho Cucamonga where residential neighborhoods historically have existed within close proximity to incompatible industrial uses. • Policy LU-6.4: Support infrastructure improvements that encourage investment in southwest Rancho Cucamonga. o Discussion: "Maintenance and investment in infrastructure and services are essential to improving the stability and vitality of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. The condition of the area's infrastructure and buildings, particularly sidewalks and streetscapes, as well as availability of services or lack thereof, communicate a great deal about a community identity. Well-maintained, inviting, aesthetically please elements make a strong quality statement about Rancho Cucamonga as a whole, and are particularly important in conveying the message that southwest Rancho Cucamonga is a desirable area for business investment." While Policy LU-6.4 discusses infrastructure improvements that encourage investment in southwest Rancho Cucamonga, it also acknowledges the critical importance of the area's services and buildings in improving and maintaining the stability and vitality of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. In the case of the subject project, the applicant proposes an Auto and Vehicle Storage with the GI District, which the Development Code identifies as the zone "Designate(d)...for the widest range of light and medium industrial activity." As previously noted, surrounding parcels which are similarly situated, and which are within the same zone have been found to house a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses for the benefit of the residents. The existence of these dynamic and varied uses creates a vitality which is critical to the stability of not only the immediate neighborhood, but to the whole of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use which meets no discernable community need may adversely affect the vitality of this area, and therefore destabilize the community identity of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Relationship Between the General Plan and the Development Code The Planning Commission must find that the proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the general plan in order to grant this appeal. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.16.120.D.1. provides: "The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards." Staff further notes that the relationship between the General Plan and the Development Code is discussed in Development Code Section 17.02.010. Particularly, subsection D provides the following regarding the Development Code's relationship with the land use element of the general plan. It states: No use of land or buildings for which an application is required pursuant to this title is to be approved for processing under this title unless it is consistent with the land use element of the general plan. In the event of any conflict between this title and the land use element, the land use element shall prevail. A proposed use is consistent with the land use element when all of the following conditions are met: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the programs and standards of the land use element. 2. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the land use element and all applicable standards contained therein. Page 5 PIRggE296 As provided in this staff report, the proposed project is not in compliance with numerous goals and policies of the land use element of the general plan. Therefore, as staff has demonstrated that the project is not in compliance with the General Plan, and as the Development Code provides that "no use of land or buildings for which an application is required...is to be approved for processing...unless it is consistent with the land use element of the general plan," staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the Planning Director's denial of the proposed Conditional Use Permit. CEQA DETERMINATION: The decision is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is disapproved by the City. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on May 26, 2021. On that same date, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: In addition to the proposed use not being in compliance with the General Plan, the project also fails to meet the following City Council Core Values: • Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all. • Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. • Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. • Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. • Equitable prosperity for all. • Continuous improvement Lastly, staff notes that representatives from Brookfield Properties have engaged staff previously requesting to use the property for truck storage. As far back as November 2019, staff met with representatives from Brookfield Properties and expressed our discouragement in these types of uses at this site for many of the same reasons discussed in the May 41" denial letter and this staff report. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Director's Denial Letter CUP DRC2020-00439 Exhibit B: Applicant's Appeal Letter Exhibit C: Supplemental Appeal Information Exhibit D: Project Description and Plans Exhibit E: Resolution of Denial 21-38 Page 6 PIRggE297 Mayor L.Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tern Lynne 8.Kennedy Council Members Ryan A.Hutchison,Kristine D.Scott,Sam Spagnolo City Manager John R.Gill ison 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91 730 1 909.477,2700 1 www.CityofRC.us ■ May 4, 2021 Joonas Partanen Brookfield Properties 9910 611 Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: LETTER OF DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00439 — H.E.R. TRUCKING, INC. - A request to operate an auto and vehicle storage facility located at 9910 6th Street in an existing industrial building within the General Industrial (GI) District—APN:0209-211-42 and 43. Dear Joonas Partanen: In my capacity as Planning Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I have reviewed the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility (the "project"). Based upon the information contained in your application and other evidence available to me, I have determined that the subject project is denied on the basis that the proposed use is not in compliance with the goals and policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, and therefore does not meet the required findings of the CUP. Protect Description: 1. The applicant, Joonas Partanen, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking Inc. is requesting to operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility at a 4.55 acre site which is improved with an existing 8,888 square foot industrial building within the General Industrial (GI) District at 9910 61h Street—APN: 0209-211-42 and 43. 2. The Conditional Use Permit is for the storage of trucks and trailers consisting of a fleet of 3- axle tractors, 53' wide dry vans, and refrigerator trailers. 3. The proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage facility proposes to operate 7 days a week, Monday to Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with truck trips occurring between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The site will be used to park a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' dry vans, refrigerator trailers and storage containers. All equipment will be on site when off duty and only 50% of the fleet is on site. The maximum number of vehicles is anticipated to be approximately 70 tractor& trailers. No goods will be stored at the facility. 4. A total of nine (9) parking spaces are required to meet the parking demand of trucking storage per Development Code Section 17.64. One (1) parking space is required per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet of tenant space. There are 11 parking spaces existing on site. Analysis: The operation of Auto and Vehicle Storage in the General Industrial (GI) District requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit provides a process for review Exhibit A PIRgQE298 DENIAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00439 — H.E.R TRUCKING May 4, 2021 Page 2 and determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for the specific site. It is anticipated that uses qualifying for a Conditional use Permit are minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Required Findings: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.16.120, the Planning Director is required to make three findings in order to approve a Conditional Use Permit. If the director cannot not make any one of these findings, the Conditional Use Permit cannot be approved. The following required findings cannot be made based on the proposed use: Finding: The proposed use does not comply with the General Plan (Development Code Section 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: The project fails to meet certain goals and policies established in the General Plan, specifically Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal ED-3 and Policy ED-3.3 and therefore does not comply with the General Plan. Goal ED-1 requires that the City"achieve and maintain a diverse and sustainable economic base." This goal further provides Policy ED-1.3 which "encourage(s) the re-use of vacant warehousing facilities and other sites in Industrial zoned areas to attract new, innovative industries, particularly green technology." The General Plan continues by noting that while the exact type of business considered to be "green tech" might change over time, "...the City will continue to support the development of new buildings and reuse of existing buildings to accommodate the evolving spatial needs of innovative firms." The project proposes the re-use of a 4.55-acre site for Auto and Vehicle Storage which had previously been used as a recycling center. The applicant proposes to re-use the 4.55-acre site and the existing industrial building located on-site to accommodate the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use. The re-use of the project site in such a manner does not comply with the General Plan as it fails to "attract new, innovative industries," let alone one that focuses on green technology. While the General Plan does not provide a definition for what constitutes an "innovative industry," staff notes that parcels of a similar size and which are located within the same zone surrounding the project site comprise industrial parks which house a variety of tenants including, but not limited to, breweries, light manufacturing business, offices and specialized auto repair. Dedicating the site in perpetuity to the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would prevent the City from attracting new innovative industries which could otherwise locate at the subject site if it were redeveloped into an industrial park similar to other parcels of approximately the same size and zoning designation. Furthermore, Auto and Vehicle Storage is not considered a green technology. The project also fails to meet General Plan Goal ED-3, which provides that the City "continue to emphasize quality as a core community value as it applies to local workers and residents." This goal further provides Policy ED-3.3 which requires that the City"maintain a healthy fiscal balance." As discussed in the General Plan, "high quality programs, facilities and services can only be provided if the City continues to attract and maintain revenue-generating businesses."The project proposes an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility to occupy a 4.55-acre industrially-zoned parcel. Using data relative to property and sales tax generation, staff has found that those parcels within the vicinity of the subject site which are similarly sized and within the same zoning designation provide a much higher number of businesses which support a diverse economic base and generally perform much better on a value-per-acre basis than Auto and Vehicle Storage. Staff PiRggE299 DENIAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00439 — H.E.R TRUCKING May 4, 2021 Page 3 has found that, on average, industrial zoned parcels throughout the City perform at a value-per- acre of approximately$4,000. Generally, Auto and Vehicle Storage facilities provide a much lower value-per-acre. Thus, dedicating the project area to an economically underperforming use such as Auto and Vehicle Storage fails to comply with ED-1.3 and is therefore not compliant with the General Plan. Finding: Granting the permit would be detrimental to the public interest or welfare to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Granting the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to the public interest and welfare as it will allow a fiscally underperforming use within an industrial zone on a site which could otherwise accommodate a variety of higher performing uses. Further, and as discussed in the previous finding, staff notes that parcels of a similar size and which are located within the same zone within the vicinity of the project site comprise industrial parks which house a variety of diverse tenants including, but not limited to, breweries, light manufacturing business, offices and specialized auto repair. A Conditional Use Permit granted in perpetuity for a fiscally underperforming business such as an Auto and Vehicle Storage use located within a high performing block of diverse businesses will have a negative impact on the economic vitality of this industrial neighborhood. The decision is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is disapproved by the City. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,685 appeal fee. All Planning Director decisions of a Conditional Use Permit will be posted to the City's website at www.CitvofRC.us/AdminApprovedProlects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please contact Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, at sean.mcpherson@cityofrc.us or (909) 477-2750, ext. 4307, Monday through Thursday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, PLA NING DEP TM T Anne Macintosh, AICP Planning Director Pegg(B@0 G R E S H A M I SAVAGE Matthew.Nelson@GreshamSavage.com • San Bernardino Office ` (909)890-4499 • fax(909)890-9877 May 12, 2021 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission c/o Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Notice of Appeal of Planning Director Administrative Denial of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code § 17.14.070) Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission: This firm represents Brookfield Properties ("Brookfield") in connection with its application on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, Inc. for the above-reference Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 seeking to operate an auto and vehicle storage facility in an existing industrial building located at 9910 6th Street (APN Nos. 0209-211-42 and 43) ("Site") in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") (the "Project"). The Project Site is currently zoned as General Industrial (GI), which designation allows for auto and vehicle storage as a conditionally permitted use. (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code§ 17.30.030;Table 17.30.030-1.) On May 4, 2021, the City Planning Director issued a decision denying Brookfield's application for the Project on the grounds that the proposed vehicle storage use was not consistent and failed to comply with certain policies and goals of the City's current General Plan, including Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal ED-3 and Policy ED-3.3. The Planning Director's denial and the written findings supporting that denial, are inadequate and insufficient to justify denial of the Project. We respectfully request that this correspondence be included as part of the administrative record for this matter. Enclosed herewith is a check in the amount of $1,685.00 as payment of the appeal processing fee for this matter. In accordance with Municipal Code Sections 17.14.070, et seq., Brookfield respectfully submits this appeal of the Planning Director's denial of the Project for the following reasons: A. The Planning Director's General Plan "Consistency' Analysis is Beyond the Scope of the Findings Under Development Code Section 17.16.120. n SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 • San Bernardino, California 92408 SAN DIEGO 401 West A Street, Suite 925 • San Diego, California 92101 �J GreshamSavage.com Exhibit B MggE8e1 B I210-001--4019620.1 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga May 12,2021 Page 2 The first part of the Planning Director's denial is based upon an interpretation of City General Plan policies and goals (which, coincidentally, are in the process of being updated as part of the pending General Plan Update) and exercise of discretion regarding long-term planning vision, each of which are more appropriately reserved for a legislative body such as the Planning Commission, rather than a member of City Planning Staff. To that end, Brookfield believes that the Planning Commission should have the opportunity to evaluate the Project and make determinations about whether the Project does or does not comply with the City's General Plan and the specific policies and goals set forth therein. The Planning Director's denial is based upon a series of findings regarding the Project's alleged non-compliance with General Plan policies that "encourage" the reuse of warehouse spaces to attract new and innovative - e.g., high revenue- generating - uses in the area, particularly green-technology. These are long-term planning policies and goals - not objective development standards or planning requirements that can be applied to a particular project on an objective, dispassionate basis. There is no finding or other determination by the City that the Project fails to comply with any uniformly-applicable, mandatory development standard for uses in the General Industrial (GI) zoning district or the General Industrial General Plan designation, such as Floor Area Ratio. As such, there are no independent, objective grounds to deny the Project. The required findings under Development Code Section 17.16.120 (D)(1) are concerned only with whether the proposed use is "allowed"within the applicable zoning district and whether it "complies" with other applicable provisions of the zoning code, General Plan, any applicable specific plans, etc.—not whether the proposed use is "consistent" with the General Plan. Therefore, a plain reading of this Code Section makes clear that the Planning Director's determination is limited to whether the proposed use is permitted within the underlying land use designations and whether it complies with other published City regulations and standards (or is capable of such compliance with imposition of reasonable conditions of approval). This interpretation is bolstered by Development Code Section 17.16.120 (E) which states that "performance criteria" and "development standards" may be imposed to ensure that the proposed use will comply with the required findings—not amorphous standards such as what constitutes a "healthy fiscal balance" for the City. Finally, even if the Development Code permitted the Planning Director to make broad General Plan goal and policy "consistency" determinations, California law does not require strict compliance with every single component of the City's General Plan; rather, the law simply requires that a project be generally consistent with the General Plan. (Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale City Council (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1552, 1563 ["State law does not require perfect conformity between a proposed project and the applicable Pggge3@2 B I210-001--4019620.1 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga May 12,2021 Page 3 general plan" because "it is nearly, if not absolutely, impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every policy set forth in the applicable plan."]; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 717-718 [To be consistent, a project must simply be "compatible" with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified].)The City Planning Director, in denying the Project, identified and "cherry-picked" certain specific General Plan policies and goals that could be used to justify the denial rather than evaluating the Project holistically and determining whether the Project is compatible with the entirety of the General Plan, as required by longstanding California law. B. The Proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage Use Would Not be Detrimental to Public Interest, Health, Safety or Welfare or Cause any "Material Injury"; Purely Economic Considerations are Not Relevant. The second half of the Planning Director's denial is based on the finding that "granting the permit would be detrimental to the public interest or welfare to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located." As a preliminary matter, we are concerned about the Planning Director's paraphrasing of the Section 17.16.120(e)(3) finding requirements as opposed to stating the finding verbatim. Specifically, the entirety of the finding is as follows: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (omitted portions highlighted). We cannot know the motive behind the excising of the terms "health, safety, convenience" and "materially injurious," but it does appear to be an implicit acknowledgement that the CUP denial simply could not be justified under these finding requirements, which are much more focused on health, safety and material injuries to persons, property or improvements. These issues are commonly understood to include those which may physically impact persons or property such as noise, odors, light and glare, traffic, etc., rather than whether a proposed use might be "fiscally underperforming". Revenue and purely economic considerations are not relevant to findings related to public interest, health, safety or welfare in this context. To allow the Code to be interpreted in the manner suggested by the Planning Director would surely result in a "slippery slope" and create a precedent with unintended and far-reaching consequences if every such approval was subject to speculative opinion as to what might be a "higher-performing" or more "ideal" use for a given property under the guise of public health and safety concerns. Economic considerations are better left to private property owners who have the right to develop and use their property based PIRgge3@3 B I210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga May 12,2021 Page 4 on market demand—not based on a list of other potential speculative uses that one individual has decided may be more useful or beneficial. C. The Planning Director's Denial is Arbitrary and Capricious, Lacks Evidentiary Support and Fails to Follow the Procedures Required by Law. First, the denial is based on the allegation that the CUP is for a "fiscally underperforming use." This term "fiscally underperforming use," however, is not defined in the letter nor does it exist in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Municipal Code or any other published City regulation or guideline. Furthermore, there are no identified thresholds, criteria or guidelines for fiscal performance of a land use. Basing the denial of a project upon a newly-invented, "on the fly" standard is the most clear cut example of an arbitrary and capricious action. Even assuming the CUP denial was not arbitrary and capricious, the total paucity of evidentiary support fails to meet any objective legal and common sense standard. The totality of the "evidence" relied on by the Planning Director is limited to the following: Using data relative to property and sales tax generation, staff has found that those parcels within the vicinity of the subject site which are similarly sized and within the same zoning designation provide a much higher number of businesses which support a diverse economic base and generally perform much better on a value-per-acre basis than Auto and Vehicle Storage. Staff has found that, on average, industrial zoned parcels throughout the City perform at a value-per-acre of approximately $4,000. Generally, Auto and Vehicle Storage facilities provide a much lower value-per-acre. This paragraph leaves so many questions unanswered: what is the fiscal analysis expertise of the staff that prepared this analysis? What was the source of the "data relative to property and sales tax generation?" Where are these "similarly sized" parcels and what businesses exist there? Other uses purportedly perform "much better" on a value-per-acre basis, but how much more? How is "value-per-acre" calculated? Is "value-per-acre" even a reasonable or generally accepted metric? In the simplest of terms, the Planning Director failed to show any work to support the stated conclusions and failed to meet the obligation of factual transparency. As for the specific "facts" cited, the denial merely states that average industrial uses perform at $4,000 value-per-acre (is that annually?), while Auto and Vehicle Storage facilities provide "much lower" value-per-acre. How much lower? Half? If the CUP use only provides $2,000 value-per-acre, then for this site it would be approximately $10,000 versus $20,000 for the City-wide "average." Assuming this hypothetical is correct (which is impossible to conclude, due to the complete absence of supporting Mgge3@4 B I210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga May 12,2021 Page 5 evidence), is the Planning Director really taking the position that a $10,000 per year value-per-acre difference is "detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located"? Finally, Development Code Section 17.16.120 (D) provides that the Planning Director "shall" approve the CUP (or approve with conditions after making the requisite findings). This language conveys a mandatory duty rather than a permissive standard that would allow the Planning Director to otherwise deny the CUP for subjective or personal reasons in his or her sole and absolute discretion. As outlined above and as will be further detailed in additional materials submitted under separate cover, there is simply no factual basis to conclude that the proposed use would not meet the requisite findings. Therefore, the Director is required to approve the CUP as provided by Development Code Section 17.16.120 (D). Conclusion Based on the foregoing, Brookfield has demonstrated that the Planning Director's denial of the CUP for the Project was arbitrary and capricious, the denial is entirely lacking in evidentiary support and the Planning Director has failed to follow the procedures required by law. Brookfield fully intends to demonstrate that the Project meets each and every CUP finding and reserves the right to submit additional grounds in support of the appeal of the Planning Director's decision prior to and during any subsequent Planning Commission hearing on the matter. We appreciate the City's processing of this appeal and look forward to a just and fair hearing on the Project before the City Planning Commission. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, Matthew Wm. Nelson, of GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN &TILDEN, A Professional Corporation MWN/jmk PIRgge3@5 B1210-001--4079620.1 G R E S H A M I SAVAGE Matthew.Nelson@GreshamSavage.com • San Bernardino Office A, : cr i-< _Y s A i (909)890-4499 • fax(909)890-9877 June 2, 2021 VIA EMAIL (Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us) Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission c/o Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Supplemental Information for Appeal of Planning Director Administrative Denial of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code§17.14.070) Dear Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission: This letter is submitted in advance of the appeal hearing scheduled for June 9,2021 to provide supplemental information to our May 12,2021 Notice of Appeal. In addition to the grounds for appeal raised in our previous letter, the Project as proposed meets each and every finding under Development Code Section 17.16.120 as follows: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code,Municipal Code,general plan,and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. a. Compliance with Zoning and General Plan. The Project site is currently zoned General Industrial (GI), which designation allows for auto and vehicle storage as a conditionally permitted use. (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code § 17.30.030; Table 17.30.030-1.) The Project site also has a General Plan designation of General Industrial, which permits a "wide range of industrial activities" (Rancho Cucamonga General Plan at LU-17). The Project is not located within any Specific Plan. The Project is within the permitted Floor Area Ratio (FAR) under the General Plan (Probable FAR of 0.50 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) based on the existing 8,888 square foot building that will remain on-site and therefore is appropriate in terms of density and intensity. (See General Plan at LU-17). SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 • San Bernardino, California 92408 SAN DIEGO 401 West A Street, Suite 925 • San Diego, California 92101 LJ GreshamSavage.com M���@6 Exhibit C Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 2 The Project is also infill development, which is identified as a "key land use issue' and is discussed as follows on page LU-53 of the General Plan: Infill Development. Rancho Cucamonga will be encouraging development of vacant or underutilized land located in the built-up areas of the City. Any new infill development should be planned to be complementary with surrounding development and to minimize impacts. Appropriate infrastructure and supporting services must be adequate or in place to serve new infill development without sacrificing services to the existing population. Rancho Cucamonga must also work hard to assist in land assembly and lot consolidation to create more successful infill development. The Project would involve the beneficial reuse of a 4.55 acre site that was previously used as a recycling center. It is complementary to, and consistent with surrounding development which consists of other industrially-zoned properties, thereby minimizing potential impacts to surrounding properties. All necessary infrastructure and supporting services are adequate and in place. Although the required findings under Development Code Section 17.16.120 (D)(1) do not require a full General Plan consistency analysis, the Project is consistent with the following relevant General Plan Land Use policies: • Policy LU-1.2: Designate appropriate land uses to serve local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate. The Project proposes to provide storage for trucks and trailers consisting of a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' wide dry vans, and refrigerator trailers, which are vital to the region's logistics industry. This Project will help satisfy the current demand for local truck storage facilities, and takes advantage of Rancho Cucamonga's location near major transportation corridors including the 1-10, 1-15, and SR-210 freeways. Should market conditions change in the future, the Project's proposed use of the site and minimal building footprint would not preclude the development of other, different uses on the site. P1Rgge3@7 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 3 • Policy LU-3.2: Encourage a mix of retail, service, industrial and manufacturing, and professional uses that create diverse, well-paying employment opportunities. The Project supports diverse employment opportunities for a diverse workforce and income levels. The Project will directly employ 97 individuals whose salaries will range from $34,500 to $110,000 per year. The Project will also indirectly support jobs within the trucking industry, which typically pay well above the median income for San Bernardino County. • Policy LU-3.3: Locate regionally-serving land uses with immediate access to the regional transportation network that is designed to provide maximum access capabilities and permit maximum dispersal of traffic. The Project's location on 6th Street in the southern portion of Rancho Cucamonga is ideally situated to provide quick access to the I-10 freeway via Archibald Avenue. This will help to minimize truck traffic on other travel corridors. • Policy LU-3.4: Promote development that is sustainable in its use of land and that limits impacts to natural resources,energy,and air and water quality.As discussed above, the Project is infill development which involves the beneficial reuse of a former recycling center. The Project is therefore sustainable and limits impacts to natural resources, energy and air and water quality that would otherwise occur if the site were developed with a more intensive use or additional building square footage. In addition, the Project will help to reduce vehicle miles traveled and corresponding truck emissions by providing a convenient location for trucks to be parked and stored locally, thereby avoiding the need to travel to more distant or less-efficient locations. The Project site is located 1.1 miles from the 1-10 Freeway, with access provided from 6th Street to Archibald. Truck travel from the site will be low-impact as it is not required to travel through residential areas to access the freeway. The site is centrally located to service local retail and distribution customers in the surrounding areas such as Ontario, Rialto, and San Bernardino. Having a centrally located site will significantly cut down on the drive time to pick up or deliver loads to the surrounding areas, thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled. • Policy LU-3.5: Work toward a sustainable jobs-housing balance by accommodating a range and balance of land uses within Rancho Cucamonga. As discussed above, the Project is an employment-generating and PIRggE808 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 4 employment-supporting use by providing an ancillary service to the trucking industry. This will help to promote a healthy jobs-housing balance. • Policy LU-3.7: Encourage new development projects to build on vacant infill sites within a built-out area, and/or redevelop previously developed properties that are underutilized. As discussed above, the Project is infill development which involves the beneficial reuse of a former recycling center. Infill and redevelopment of this type creates more sustainable development that improves efficiencies in the use of infrastructure and the use of land, and over time improves efficiencies in energy and transportation. Notably, the Planning Director's decision did not cite to a single General Plan Land Use Polio in justifying the denial of the Project, and instead focused solely on Economic Development Policies which contain broader policy considerations that are not appropriate for a project-level land use decision such as whether to approve a Conditional Use Permit. Moreover, the Planning Director's exclusive reliance upon fiscal considerations is misguided and does not reflect actual market conditions. The relatively small size of the site does not lend itself to many of the uses suggested by the Planning Director, such as being redeveloped into an "industrial park". In addition, most "green industry" manufacturing uses (i.e., photovoltaic panels, wind turbines or electric vehicles) require much larger sites to be able to maximize production and be financially viable. The market conditions will dictate the highest and best use of the site, which may evolve and change over time. For example, the recycling industry (which is considered "green") is currently struggling across the U.S., as evidenced by the closure of rePlanet (the former site occupant) in 2019 along with its other 283 recycling centers and processing facilities. Conversely, the transportation and logistics sector is the backbone of the economy. While many industries have been negatively impacted by the COVID- 19 pandemic, the trucking industry is thriving and has continued to see growth in an ever demanding e-commerce and distribution market. H.E.R Trucking has seen a steady increase in revenue during these trying times while also not downsizing or furloughing and as a result, the company will create employment opportunities for local citizens in the logistics and transportation business. P1Rgge3@9 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 5 The property owner should not be precluded from using the site for a lawful purpose until a "new or innovative industry' or green technology tenant or buyer comes along. Retail and manufacturing are in decline while distribution and trucking companies are thriving. The site is already developed with an existing office building, a fully paved yard, lighting and walls, which makes it an ideal site for outside storage, trucking and transport facilities. b. Consistency With Other Development Code Provisions. The Project site otherwise complies with all other Code requirements. The site has adequate parking (9 spaces are required under Development Code Section 17.64; there are eleven existing spaces). Appropriate screening/fencing and lighting will be provided pursuant to Development Code Chapters 17.48 and 17.58,respectively. The Project will comply with all performance standards contained within Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code. The Project will not involve the use, handling, storage or transport of hazardous materials. The Project will comply with the industrial noise and other standards included in Table 17.66.110-1 (refer to Finding No. 3, below for more detail). The Project will not create odors, heat, excessive vibration, glare or high- intensity illumination. Conditions of Approval may be imposed as part of the Conditional Use Permit as necessary, to otherwise ensure compliance with any other specific Code requirements or performance standards. 2. The site is physically suited for the type,density,and intensity of the proposed use including access,utilities,and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Auto and vehicle storage is a conditionally permitted use within the GI Zoning District. As discussed above, the Project does not exceed the maximum FAR of 0.60 for the General Industrial Land Use Designation under the General Plan. Therefore, the site is suited for the density and intensity of the proposed use. Because the Project site was previously used as a recycling center, there is adequate access and existing utility infrastructure to serve the site and there are no physical constraints. At 4.55 acres, the site is an ideal size to accommodate the parking and storage of 70 tractor-trailers, which is the maximum number proposed. The Project applicant is willing to accept and abide by reasonable conditions of approval to otherwise meet all related performance criteria and development standards. PIRgge330 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 6 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. As discussed above, the Project will comply with all performance standards contained within Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code, including the "Class B" industrial standards contained within Development Code Table 17.66.110-1. As stated in Development Code Section 17.66.110: "The performance standards allow industrial uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the land use category to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding industrial activity". Specifically, the Class B industrial standards "...are intended to provide for the broadest range of industrial activity while assuring a basic level [of] environmental protection. It is the intent of the standards of this section to provide for uses whose operational needs may produce noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odors, or humidity, heat, and glare which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to meet the Class A standards. The standards are so designed to protect uses on adjoining sites from effects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability". (Id.) Therefore, compliance with the standards contained within Table 17.66.110-1 conclusively establishes that the Project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Each provision contained within Table 17.66.110-1 is addressed below: • Noise: Although noise caused by motor vehicles is specifically exempt from the noise standards contained in Table 17.66.110-1, the Project will not create noise levels exceeding 80db. Furthermore, truck trips will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., thereby limiting the potential for noise impacts to occur during sensitive hours while traveling on roadways elsewhere within the City. • Vibration: Although vibration caused by motor vehicles is specifically exempt from the standards contained in Table 17.66.110-1, the trucks accessing the PIRgge331 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 7 Project site will not cause significant vibration, and no other sources of vibration are proposed. • Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: The Project site is fully paved and will not create dust or "emit particulate matter or air contaminants that are readily detectable without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses". In addition, the trucks accessing the Project site will not be permitted to queue or idle for any significant length of time. State law limits truck idling times to five minutes. Approximately 70 tractor trailers will be stored on site, which will not be arriving/departing simultaneously, but will be accessing and leaving the site periodically at different times throughout the day. Therefore, the Project would not result in a detectable amount of exhaust or emissions occurring at any one time. • Odor: The Project would not "emit matter causing unpleasant odors that are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses". Other than occasional diesel exhaust (which would dissipate quickly and not cause an odor concern for adjacent properties) the Project does not include any odor sources. In fact, compared to the previous recycling center use on the Site,the Project might actually result in a reduction of odors. • Humidity, Heat and Glare: The Project does not include any components that would create humidity, heat or glare. With regard to lighting, the Project will comply with the requirements under Chapter 17.58 to ensure that light spillover to adjacent properties does not occur. The above considerations illustrate the subject matter and issues that are relevant to Finding No. 3. Whether the proposed Project would be "fiscally underperforming" and concerns related to "economic vitality" are clearly not within the scope of applicable environmental, health and safety considerations and to find otherwise would result in a gross misinterpretation and misapplication of the Code. CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption: Infill Development Projects The CEQA Guidelines include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which shall therefore be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. The Project falls qualifies for the Class 32 Exemption for Infill Development Projects (CEQA Guidelines§ 15332) as follows: PIRgge332 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 8 a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The Project is consistent with its general plan and zoning designations of General Industrial (GI). Auto and vehicle storage is a conditionally permitted use within the GI Zone. (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code § 17.30.030; Table 17.30.030-1.) The Project site's General Plan designation of General Industrial permits a "wide range of industrial activities" (Rancho Cucamonga General Plan at LU-17). The Project will comply with all performance standards contained within Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code, including the "Class B" industrial standards contained within Development Code Table 17.66.110-1. As discussed above, the Project is consistent with applicable (i.e., Land Use) General Plan Policies LU-1.2, -3.3, -3.4, -3.5 and -3.7. Broader Economic Development policies contained within the General Plan are not relevant to a project-level decision on a Conditional Use Permit. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project site is 4.55 acres and is substantially surrounded by urban uses. c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The Project site is paved and developed with an existing 8,888 foot structure and other associated improvements. The surrounding area consists of other industrially-zoned properties which have been developed and cleared of natural features. Neither the Project site nor surrounding properties contain suitable habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality. Compliance with the "Class B" industrial standards contained within Development Code Table 17.66.110-1 will ensure that the Project will not result in any noise or air quality issues. The Project does not propose any truck PIRgge333 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2, 2021 Page 9 washing facilities or services, and will not otherwise generate any significant sources of wastewater. The Project site is already paved, and the Project will not increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the Site such that increased stormwater runoff would occur. Projects that generate fewer than 250 daily trips do not require a Level of Service (LOS) or vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis pursuant to the City's traffic impact analysis guidance that was adopted in June 2020 (Resolution No. 2020-056). Such projects are deemed to not have a significant traffic impact due to their small size and/or low trip generation. The Project will store a maximum number of 70 tractor trailers when not in use and therefore will generate vehicle trips that are well below the 250 screening threshold. e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Project site was previously developed with a recycling center, and is adequately served by all required utilizes and public services. The change in use to auto and vehicle storage will not result in increased demand for any utilities or public services. As demonstrated herein, there is ample evidence to support approval of the Project and no proper basis for the Planning Director's denial since the Project meets each and every required finding. We look forward to further addressing these issues at the upcoming appeal hearing. Very truly yours, Matthew Wm. Nelson, of GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN &TILDEN, A Professional Corporation MWN:jmk PIRgge334 ■ 0 Architectural Corporation March 31, 2021 Sean McPherson,AICP sean.mcpherson@citvofrc.us Senior Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Regarding: CUP 9910 6th St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA Amor Job Number A2338 Dear Sean, As we had advised during the initial submittal in November,the property is proposed to be used for general truck and trailer storage by H.E.R. Trucking Inc. The main contact at H.E.R. Trucking is Hugo Ruiz President hugo@hertrucking.com, (818) 968-5110. This site is primarily going to be used for fleet storage. Per a conversation in November of 2020 with planner Dat Tran, the overall land use fits into the Auto and Vehicle Storage designation per the city's land use table but requires a staff level CUP by the Planning Director. No new structures are anticipated and the operator plans to use portions of the existing approximately 8,900 SF building for administration uses and some temporary warehousing. See provided existing floor plan on the enclosed modified exhibit. The Hours of Operation are proposed to be 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Tenant plans to use the site to park its fleet of 3 axle tractors, 53' dry vans, refrigerator trailers and occasionally containers from the port. All equipment will be on site when off duty. Normally only 50%of the fleet is on site. Number of vehicles anticipated are 70 tractor& trailers on holidays: normally half that otherwise. In other words, at such times as the tractors and/or trailers are not in use making regular deliveries, they would be stored at the facility. When the company's delivery volume requires the trucks,they will leave the facility. Routine truck and trailer maintenance such as oil changes and repairs will be done at the site. Tenant plans to use the existing loading docks for LTL (Less than load) and trans loading services. Customers will not be bringing goods to the facility. The trucking company could have smaller loads on trucks they are bringing to the site for storage that they wish to consolidate onto one trailer to deliver. This would not be a regular occurrence. The primary use of the site would be the storage of unused vehicles. Total number of staff on site in shifts expected to range from 25 to 30 with the largest shift having 12 to 15 staff present. Clients and other outside visitors are not expected to visit the site. A more detailed description of the operations related to traffic is as follows and as indicated in the enclosed Traffic Impact Assessment: • Typical day involves 21 on site employees between 6 AM to 6 PM. There are no afternoon shifts. Evening shift will only be a security guard. Exhibit D www.AmorArch.com 9483 Haven Avenue,Suite 100,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 909.259.9971 PIRgg(B35 Sean McPherson CUP 9910 6th St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA March 31, 2021 Page 2 of 2 • Employee times are as follows: 0 13 employees 8 AM to 4 PM 0 4 employees 6 AM to 2 PM 0 1 employee 9 AM to 3PM 0 3 executives (will assume 8 AM to 4 PM) • Between 7 AM to 8 PM, a maximum of 18 trucks will occur throughout various times in the day. • For 14 trucks, a car will be driven into the site to pick up a tractor&trailer and then the tractor&trailer will drive out of the site. • For 4 trucks, a tractor&trailer will drive into the site to drop the truck off and then a car will drive out of the site. Based on the above and the additional submittal documents, we have taken the liberty of providing some suggested findings in support of the project: 1. The subject property is zoned GI, General Industrial. The overall proposed land use fits into the Auto and Vehicle Storage designation perthe city's land use table (17.30.030-1 of the Municipal Code)which states that"the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code(e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law." 2. Landlord's traffic engineer has provided a Traffic Impact Assessment that demonstrates that the current project would produce a less than significant traffic impact on the adjoining streets. 3. Landlord will provide the suggested street improvements as depicted on the enclosed site plan. 4. There are other similar truck storage facilities within the city of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. The Director's approval of the project would not constitute a special approval not customarily offered to similar sites in the same zone. Very truly yours, AMORARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION 44&i Bill Beebe www.AmorArch.com 9483 Haven Avenue,Suite 100,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 909.259.9971 PIRggE836 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: F.1 THRU F.6 THESE CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED BY THE LANDLORD AND HAVE BEEN REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY THE FIRE MARSHAL(SHANE ADAMS, FIRE PREVENTION SUPERVISOR.) F.7 A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUSINESS PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE SAN TYP.I BERNARDINO COUNTY CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY(CUPA).SUBMITTAL CAN BE O ILERS MADE ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING SYSTEM p^(TYPJ LENGTH F TRA (CERS)AT https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ 4 TRAILERS ONLY LENGT TRAILERS TRAILER AND/OR TRACTORS, SHIPPING CONTAINER F.8 A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY EASEMENT 55'-11" 91'-5" 130'-6" (E)NEIGHBORING STATEMENT ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE FIRE DISTRICT.SEE SECTION ' BUILDING N 89-44-21 W 316.22 — — 5001.5.1 OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE. — — — — — — — F.9 ONE OR MORE OF THE OPERATIONS IN USE OR PROPOSED FOR THIS BUILDING/BUSINESS I REQUIRES A FIRE CODE OPERATING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRE I I I CODE AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 1-1. I r I PROPOSED VEHICLE STORAGE: I _ I PRO TRAILER I, SITE WILL BE USED TO PARK FLEET OF 3-AXLE I STORAGE AR KEEP CLEAR r TRACTORS, 53' DRY VANS, REFRIGERATOR TRAILERS AND OCCASIONALLY CONTAINERS I (E)BLOCK WALL I FROM THE PORT. NUMBER OF VECHICLES ANTICIPATED ARE 70 TRACTOR&TRAILERS ON HOLIDAYS AND NORMALLY HALF THAT OTHERWISE. OF I \_(E)NEIGHBORING BUILDING ALL STORAGE AREA WILL PROVIDE MINIMUM 14'-0"VERTICAL CLEARANCE. �] r PROPOSED VEHICLE STORAGE: �I I SITE WILL BE USED TO PARK FLEET OF 3-AXLE J TRACTORS, 53' DRY VANS, REFRIGERATOR TRAILERS AND OCCASIONALLY CONTAINERS I FROM THE PORT. NUMBER OF VECHICLES ANTICIPATED ARE 70 TRACTOR&TRAILERS ON ] I I HOLIDAYS AND NORMALLY HALF THAT OTHERWISE. r ALL STORAGE AREA WILL PROVIDE MINIMUM 14'-0"VERTICAL CLEARANCE. (E) EASEMENTS I I J - I I ,I• -- J I I � 34 TRACTORS& I s J 1 O TRAILERS 27 TRAILERS ONLY J Z I 7 Y r PROP u 1' T I L IJ n KEEP i AREA J�r�fJlnrJC CLEAR O 4P L) I 6th St w (E)BLOCK WALL I 1 N IP p (E)BOUNDARY— LINE,TYP. i � a _ I I (E)AC LPAVEMENT 4th St ■■ ■■ ■■ .. .. .r�■ T , I a M I � r - zo C14Q o I (0 am 2 I I �� 97'-10" co I N 75'-7��——— 0 O KEEP CD I Z I CLEAR I I I - I I 14' I I I (E) LOADING AREA TYP." I I I 103 I w 4'-0" - r FINISH FLOOR 2 LOADING Z 0 STILLS cog J - vLO (E)AC r O Q - (E)F11 zPAVEMENTS a (E)RAILROAD I HYDRAN / r TRACKS i 2T CTORS ~ � TRAILERS IRKING ^� C I OFFICES AREA (E)WAREHOUSE 0'-0" a AREA I 0 L I 101 ' FINISH FLOOR O I (E) 4 TRACTORS ¢ o SINGLE-STORY PARKING I EASEMENT 35'1-11" BUILDING r GENDER (E) LOADING 8,888 SF TOILET AREA N SEE ENLARGED BLOCK 1 O2 FLOOR PLAN I WALL - - (E)ELECTRIC - TRANSFORME I `� PAD ID (E)GREASE RAIL GUAR TRAP MANHOL (4) I - p _ I (E) (E)SEWER I (E) (E) CHAIN- ---- --J GATE (L)KNOX LINKCLEANOUT LAR DS AP O / (E) B I FENCE I (E)OFFICES F - L/ J AREA (E) LAN DSCAPE — 00 WHEEL 10(E) /(E)AC (E)FIRE AREA / T (E) Cl) (E)CONTROL I STOP[() STALLS LPAVEMENT HYDRANT J / (E)AC LANDSCAPE CO BOX / LLCPAVEMENT AREA 7 )LANDSCAPE ( ONUMENT (N)5'WIDE SIDEWALK E ( ) (E)SIDEWALK 1 "- AREA SIGN BE RELOCATED ED WITHIN(E)EASEMENT PROPERTY --- ---- -- LINE O _ _ -� LLI Z (E) (E) (E)POWER POLE-- (E) N 89-42-59 W (E) JJ 316.21' (E) — — — DRIVE-WAY DRIVE-WAY o ® DRIVE WAY DRIVE WAY' (E) (E) o w _ ` DRIVE-WAY DRIVE-WAY DRIVE-WAY � z I 75'-7" I > (E)BACK 4 ' E 28' 18, < (E)STREET LIG T FLOW DEVICE (E)CATCH BASIN (E)UTILITY VAULT w PULLBOX (E)TELEPHONE (E)WATERMETER WITH MANHOLE W 'WIDE SIDEWALK L---------------------------------------------------J (E)FIRE SERVICE (E)CABLE TV BOX WITHIN(E)EASEMENT > Q PULLBOX E CABLE TV BOX (y` CONNECTION&VALVE (E)POWER POLE W/ MAX.5%TRAVEL DIRECTIONS J (N)5'WIDE SIDEWALK (E)CATCH BASIN -m AND MAX.2%CROSS Q 1/16" = 1'-0" Q WITHIN(E)EASEMENT WITH MANHOLE (E)DRIVE APPROACH AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDED MAY 24,1988 AS U) m MAX.5%TRAVEL DIRECTIONS TO BE MODIFIED INSTRUMENT NO.88-164375,OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,THIS ITEM O AND MAX.2%CROSS SLOPE SIXTH STREET AFFECTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS PLOTTED HEREON. wj 2 V AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDED OCT 18,1988 AS 01f (E) BUILDING ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN N INSTRUMENT NO.88-350119,OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,THIS ITEM LLI AFFECTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS PLOTTED HEREON. SCALE: 1"=40'-0" 0 40 80 160 THIS PLAN AND CONCEPT DRAWINGS ARE PROPERTY OF AMOR ARCHITECTURAL 9483 HAVEN AVENUE, SUITE 100 CORPORATION.THIS DRAWING IS LOANED WITHOUT OTHER CONSIDERATION THAN THE AGREEMENT AND CONDITION THAT IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, SITE PLAN RANCHO C U CAM O N GA, CA 91730 COPIED,OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF,DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY,AND IS NOT TO B ROO KF I E L D BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO ASSIST IN MAKING OR TO FURNISH ANY INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS,PRINTS,APPARATUS OR PARTS J J L 909.259.9971 TEL. LOGISTICS THEREOF. THE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS DRAWING WILL BE CONSTRUED AS AN • ACCEPTANCE OF THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS AND AS AN ADMISSION OF THE 9910 SIXTH ST 909.944.8409 FAX. Am I .EXCLUSIVE OWNERSHIP OF THE PLAN AND CONCEPT DRAWINGS OF AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION. THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL PLAN ONLY AND IS REVISED: 2021 .03.31RANCHO C U CAM O N GA CA WEST COAST I CENTRAL I EAST COAST Architectural SUBJECT TO CHANGES. AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION MAKES NO WARRANTY NOR REPRESENTATION TO ITS ACCURACY. A2338 2020.1 2.01 www.AmorArch.com Corporation ©2021 AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION - All Rights Reserved Page 37 Page 317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (E) ROLL-UP DOOR (E) ROLL-UP DOOR ■ I � I I O O 0 (E) LOADING a AREA J 103 O w4'-0" - FINISH FLOOR LO T I I + (E) OFFICE (E) OFFICE 105 106 I I (E) HALLWAY 104 I I (E)ALLGENDER TOILET (E) ROLL-UP DOOR 0 108 (E) DATA ROOM (E)ALLGENDER 111 (E) HALLWAY TOILET 107 (E) LOADING 109 AREA 102 co I (E)WAREHOUSE AREA 101 (E) BREAK ROOM 0'-0. 110 FINISH FLOOR I I (E)OFFICE 113 (E) HALLWAY 112 0O O 0 a J J O (E) RECEPTION w 115 (E) LOBBY 114 F — — — Kd Ed E ROLL-UP DOOR — — 75'-T J (E) BUILDING FLOOR PLAN N 1/8" = 1'-0" nommol 0 2 4 10 THIS PLAN AND CONCEPT DRAWINGS ARE PROPERTY OF AMOR ARCHITECTURAL ( E ) FLOOR PLAN 9483 HAVEN AVENUE, SUITE 100 CORPORATION.THIS DRAWING IS LOANED WITHOUT OTHER CONSIDERATION THAN THE AGREEMENT AND CONDITION THAT IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, RANCHO CU CAM O N GA, CA 91730 COPIED,OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF,DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY,AND IS NOT TO B ROO KF I E L D BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO ASSIST IN MAKING OR TO FURNISH ANY INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS,PRINTS,APPARATUS OR PARTS J J L 909.259.9971 TEL. LOGISTICS THEREOF. THE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS DRAWING WILL BE CONSTRUED AS AN • • ACCEPTANCE OF THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS AND AS AN ADMISSION OF THE 9910 SIXTH ST. 909.944.8409 FAX. Aml EXCLUSIVE OWNERSHIP OF THE PLAN AND CONCEPT DRAWINGS OF AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION. THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL PLAN ONLY AND IS RANCHO C U CAM O N GA CA WEST COAST I CENTRAL I EAST COAST Architectural SUBJECT TO CHANGES. AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION MAKES NO WARRANTY NOR REPRESENTATION TO ITS ACCURACY. A2338 2021 .03.31 www.AmorArch.com Co r p o ration ©2021 AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION - All Rights Reserved Page 38 Page 318 RESOLUTION NO. 21-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISION TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-439,A REQUEST TO OPERATE AN AUTO AND VEHICLE STORAGE USE WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI)DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9910 6T"STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-211-42 AND 43. A. Recitals. 1. Joonas Partanen with Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, filed an application for the approval Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga denied Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439, and made findings supporting that decision. 3. On May 12, 2021, Joonas Partanen with Brookfield Properties,on behalf of H.E.R.Trucking ("Appellant"), filed a timely appeal of the Planning Director's decision denying the application. 4. On June 9, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Director's decision to deny the application and making the findings of support thereof. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 9, 2021, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant, Joonas Partanen, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking Inc. is requesting to operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility at a 4.55 acre site which is improved with an existing 8,888 square foot industrial building within the General Industrial (GI) District at 9910 6th Street—APN: 0209-211-42 and 43. b. The Conditional Use Permit is for the storage of trucks and trailers consisting of a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' wide dry vans, and refrigerator trailers. c. The proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage facility proposes to operate 7 days a week, Monday to Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with truck trips occurring between 7:00 Exhibit E PIRgg(B39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-38 APPEAL DRC2021-00159 — Brookfield Properties June 9, 2021 Page 2 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The site will be used to park a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' dry vans, refrigerator trailers and storage containers. All equipment will be on site when off duty and only 50%of the fleet is on site.The maximum number of vehicles is anticipated to be approximately 70 tractor & trailers. No goods will be stored at the facility. d. A total of nine(9)parking spaces are required to meet the parking demand of trucking storage per Development Code Section 17.64. One (1) parking space is required per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet of tenant space. There are 11 parking spaces existing on site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is allowed within the applicable zoning district but does not comply with the applicable provisions of the general plan.The proposed project is permitted within the applicable zoning district upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and complies with relevant technical development standards. However, the project does not comply with multiple goals and policies of the general plan. Specifically, the project does not comply with Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal Lu-1, Policy LU-1.1, Goal LU-6, and Policies LU-6.1 and LU-6,4 of the General Plan. Further,the project is not in compliance with Development Code Section 17.02.010.D, which requires that"use of land or buildings for which an application is required pursuant to this title is to be approved for processing unless it is consistent with the land use element of the general plan." As the project is inconsistent with the land use element of the general plan, the project is not in compliance with Development Code Section 17.02.010.D. b. The site is not physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use. The site is not suited for the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use.The industrial neighborhood within which the project proposes to locate is comprised of a variety of industrial and commercial businesses including light and medium manufacturing, office, and specialized auto repair. A single- family residential neighborhood is located approximately 1,400 feet to the west. Notably, and immediately to the east of the project site, is an industrial park which contains a brewery (Rowdy's Brewery). Locating the proposed use immediately next to these types of uses creates conflicts which could include reduced air quality and noise. C. Granting the permit will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Economic development and land use policies contained within the general plan are intended to promote the public interest, health, safety, convenience and welfare. The project fails to meet numerous economic development and land use goals and policies as established in the general plan, namely, Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.1, Goal LU-6, and Policies LU-6.1 and LU-6.4. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categoricallyy exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CRQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is disapproved by the City. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the Appeal of a Planning Director decision denying DRC2020-00439 and PBgg(B40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-38 APPEAL DRC2021-00159 — Brookfield Properties June 9, 2021 Page 3 upholds the Planning Director's decision to deny Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of June 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: PIRgge341 RECEIVED REjHAM SAVAGE JUN 1 6.-Z0G ry1 Matthe \elsot reshamSavagc.com - San Bernardino Officc (909)890-4499 . faa (909)890-987 7 CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `off g ` `70 June 15, 2021 f Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Re: Notice of Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Regarding Planning Director Denial of DRC2020-00439 (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code §17.14.070) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This firm represents Brookfield Properties ("Brookfield") in connection with its application on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, Inc. for the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439 seeking to operate an auto and vehicle storage facility in an existing industrial building located at 9910 6th Street (APN Nos. 0209-211-42 and 43) ("Site") in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") (the "Project"). This notice of appeal is submitted as a final attempt to give the City Council the opportunity to remedy the unlawful actions of City staff and the Planning Commission due to the improper denial of the Project and avoid the drain on City resources that will occur should we be required to litigate this matter. On May 4, 2021, the City Planning Director issued a troubling and unusual decision denying Brookfield's application for the Project solely on the grounds that the proposed vehicle storage use was allegedly inconsistent with certain economic policies and goals of the City's current General Plan, including Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3, Goal ED-3 and Policy ED-3.3. The Planning Director's denial and the written findings supporting that denial were wholly inadequate and insufficient to justify denial of the Project. Brookfield timely filed an appeal of the Planning Director's decision, which was heard by the Planning Commission on June 9, 2021. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 21-38 denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Director's decision. Unfortunately, there was also no basis in law or fact to justify the Planning Commission's denial of Brookfield's appeal. We respectfully request that this correspondence be included as part of the administrative record for this matter. Enclosed herewith is a check in the amount of $1,685.00 as payment of the appeal processing fee for this matter. °3 SSO Fast Hospitality C.auc,Suite 300 ® San Bernardino, California 9- 4(il West ,, tiu-ect, Suite 924 ® San I)ieho, California 41210t Gr sbalnsaaag .colas Attachment 2 Page 322 B1210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 2 In accordance with Municipal Code Sections 17.14.070, et seq., Brookfield respectfully submits this appeal of the Planning Director's denial of the Project and the Planning Commission's subsequent denial of the appeal for the following reasons: 1. Previous Arguments Raised on Appeal. Correspondence dated May 12,2021 and June 2,2021 was submitted to the City as part of Brookfield's appeal and was included as part of the June 9, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report packet at Exhibits B and C, respectively. Additional arguments and information were presented by Brookfield and its legal counsel at the Planning Commission hearing. For sake of brevity the analysis and arguments made therein will not be fully reiterated in this letter,but are briefly summarized as follows: • The Planning Director's General Plan "consistency analysis' was beyond the scope of the permissible findings under Development Code Section 17.16.120 which only requires "compliance" with applicable provisions of the General Plan, etc.—NOT a consistency analysis based upon broader economic considerations. • The Planning Director's decision did not cite to a single General Plan Land Use Polici! in justifying the denial of the Project, nor did the June 9, 2019 Planning Commission staff report address any of the above policies or dispute Brookfield's consistency analysis. Instead, the Planning Commission staff report instead discussed three completely inapplicable General Plan Land Use Policies in an attempt to justify the denial: LU-1.1, LU-6.1 and LU-6.4 (dealing with residential neighborhoods, commercial services and infrastructure, respectively). These policies are irrelevant to an industrially-zoned project site that will have no impact on residential neighborhoods and is already served by existing infrastructure. • The Project is infill development (beneficial reuse of a 4.55 acre site that was previously used as a recycling center) and is therefore consistent with General Plan Land Use Policies discussed at page LU-53 of the General Plan as well as policies LU-1.2, LU-3.2, LU-3.3, LU-3.4, LU-3.5 and LU-3.7 due to the Project's strategic access close to the I-10 Freeway via Archibald Avenue; creation of jobs; support of a healthy jobs-housing balance; reduction of vehicle miles traveled; and sustainability due to reuse of the existing site with no new construction proposed. This consistency analysis related to these policies was never addressed or refuted by City staff. • The Project site is currently zoned General Industrial (GI), which designation allows for auto and vehicle storage as a conditionally permitted use. (Rancho Page 323 B 1210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 3 Cucamonga Development Code§ 17.30.030;Table 17.30.030-1.) The Project site also has a General Plan designation of General Industrial, which permits a "wide range of industrial activities" (Rancho Cucamonga General Plan at LU- 17). There was no finding or other determination by staff that the Project fails to comply with any uniformly-applicable, mandatory development standard for uses in the General Industrial (GI) zoning district or the General Industrial General Plan designation. • Brookfield demonstrated that the Project will comply with all performance standards contained within Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code; however, none of these performance standards were mentioned in the Planning Director's denial or the June 9, 2021 staff report. There was absolutely no factual basis for the finding that the Project would be"detrimental to the public interest or welfare to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located." • Some of the Planning Commissioners expressed general concern about "incompatibility" with surrounding land uses, most notably the adjacent Rowdy's Brewery. However, all surrounding property owners received notice of the hearing and no letters were received, nor were there any public comments made at the Planning Commission hearing from any concerned adjacent property owners. In addition, staff's June 9, 2021 presentation also focused exclusively on nearby office park and manufacturing uses to support the argument that a truck storage facility was "incompatible" with the area, while ignoring the warehouse and larger industrial uses to the north and south of the Project site. • The Project meets each and every one of the CUP findings under Development Code Section 17.16.120 based upon a plain, common sense reading of the Code and General Plan. However, these provisions have been stretched, misinterpreted and misapplied in such a way as to amount to an abuse of discretion.' Brookfield hereby incorporates by reference each and every one of the statements and arguments in support of its position contained in the above-referenced correspondence into the record for this appeal before the City Council. ' Cal. Code Civ.Proc.§1094.5;Topanga Assn.for a Scenic Communihj v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506,517. Page 324 B1210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 4 2. The Real Reason for Denial: Attempted Unlawful "Retroactive" Application of Code Provisions Not Yet In Effect. The failure of City staff and the Planning Commission to analyze any of the relevant standards, code requirements and policies that actually apply to the Project was puzzling and initially suggested that this denial was prejudicial and based on other inappropriate reasons (perhaps a "general dislike" of the Project) rather than any of the required findings. Also troubling was that the Planning Commission packet only included a Resolution for denial of the appeal, which suggested that a decision had already been prematurely made before considering any of the relevant information presented at the hearing. In fact, the reason for this inexplicable and seemingly prejudicial denial of the Project and subsequent appeal became clear the following week upon review of the June 16, 2021 City Council Agenda which contained Item G.1: Ordinance No. 982 entitled "An Ordinance Of The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, Amending Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code To Modifij Administrative Procedures within the Development Code And Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses And Definitions And Create New Development Standards For Industrial Development Within The City, Making Findings In Support Thereof, And Making A Determination That The Ordinance Is Exempt From The California Environmental Quality Act". Among other things, Ordinance No. 982 would result in a complete ban on auto and vehicle storage anywhere within the City without any rational basis or valid justification; it would also change the required CUP findings to include expanded considerations that were seemingly the basis for this Project denial on May 4, 2021, even though the Ordinance had not yet been adopted. During the June 9, 2021 Planning Commission hearing, staff and Planning Commissioners repeatedly stated that the Project would be better suited to the City's Southeast Industrial Quadrant ("SEIQ")—despite the fact that a moratorium on industrial development was enacted for the SEIQ on November 4, 2020 and despite staff's knowledge that Ordinance No. 982 would be introduced less than one week later, proposing to ban the Project's proposed use City-wide. City staff acted in bad faith by denying and delaying the Project until just before the proposed City-wide ban was to be announced. The proposed Project did not involve any tenant improvements, therefore Brookfield's tenant could have potentially begun operations at the site immediately after CUP approval upon obtaining a business license, which would have vested the entitlement well before Ordinance No. 982 was introduced. Were it not for staff's improper actions in denying the CUP based on inapplicable criteria in an attempt to "run the clock", the Project would already be operational. Page 325 B 1210-001--40796M 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 5 As shown on attached Exhibit "A", Ordinance No. 982 would expand the CUP findings to include "consistency" with the General Plan rather than "compliance" and would require consistency with the "purposes" of the Development Code and zoning district instead of simply requiring compliance with applicable provisions. Other language and considerations within the proposed new Section 17.20.060 that were improperly applied to the Project (before ever having been made available to the public) have also been highlighted within Exhibit A. Review of the Planning Director denial letter and the record of the Planning Commission appeal clearly shows that these new, expanded considerations were the basis for the denial rather than the scope of permissible findings under the Code section then in effect. This sheds some light upon why the Planning Director's decision was solely based upon revenue and economic considerations and an assertion that the Project would be "fiscally underperforming". This term "fiscally underperforming use," is not defined in the denial letter nor does it exist in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Municipal Code or any other published City regulation or guideline. Furthermore, there are no identified thresholds, criteria or guidelines for fiscal performance of a land use. Under the Development Code Amendments proposed under Ordinance No. 982 (which have yet to take effect) these expanded considerations might arguably be permissible; however, they are clearly beyond the scope of the current Code which was in effect at the time of Project denial and the subsequent Planning Commission denial of Brookfield's appeal. Because the Project clearly met each and every finding under current Section 17.16.120, the Planning Director was forced to instead rely on these newly-developed standards in an attempt to justify denial of the Project. Basing the denial of a project upon a newly-invented, "on the fly" standard is the most clear cut example of an arbitrary and capricious action. A property owner has the right to know what legal standards will apply to the use and development of their property, so that they can make investment decisions accordingly. Those standards cannot be a "moving target" based on an opinion that a different, hypothetical use might be more desirable or beneficial. The Planning Director's decision was clearly based on a premature application of the Development Code Amendments proposed under Ordinance No. 982 before they were even introduced at a public hearing in a clear attempt to advance the City's interests in enforcing these new policies which had been under development for the past six months. This violates the well-established legal principle that new laws are only intended to operate prospectively unless specific language of retroactive application is included.2 The proposed amendments to the Development Code also make clear that they are 2 Myers v.Phillip Morris Companies,Inc.,28 Cal.4th 833,840;see also Evangelatos v.Superior Court, 44 Ca1.3d 1188, 1206-1208; Quarry v.Doe I(2012)53 Ca1.4th 945,955. Page 326 B 1210-001--4079620.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 6 only intended to be applied to projects prospectively and following the effective date according to Section 17.02.020(F),which provides: F. Effect of zoning code changes on projects in process. The enactment of this title, or any amendments thereto, may have the effect of imposing different standards on new land uses, development, and/or structures than those that applied to existing land uses, development, and/or structures. Following the effective date of this title the following provisions shall apply. Successive amendments to this title shall specify their applicability to pending applications and projects not yet or under construction; in the event an amendment is silent on this matter, the following shall apply. 1. Pending applications. All land use permit applications that are active and that have been determined by the planning director to be complete before the effective date of this title, or any amendments thereto, will be processed according to the regulations in effect when the application was deemed complete. (Emphasis added). Therefore, the Planning Director and Planning Commission erred by applying the considerations outlined in the Development Code Amendments proposed under Ordinance No. 982, rather than limiting their review to the findings in effect at the time of Project submittal and review. Furthermore, in the event that Ordinance No. 982 is approved prior to Brookfield's City Council appeal hearing, it is clear that only the findings under existing Development Code Section 17.16.120 may be considered. 3. Decision to Unfairly Target Auto and Vehicle Storage is Not Supported by Substantial Evidence. The May 4,2021 Planning Director denial letter contained the following reasoning: "Using data relative to property and sales tax generation, staff has found that those parcels within the vicinity of the subject site which are similarly sized and within the same zoning designation provide a much higher number of businesses which support a diverse economic base and generally perform much better on a value-per-acre basis than Auto and Vehicle Storage. Staff has found that, on average, industrial zoned parcels throughout the City perform at a value-per-acre of approximately $4,000. Generally, Auto and Vehicle Storage facilities provide a much lower value-per-acre." Besides the fact that there was absolutely no supporting data or evidence provided for the above statement, this reasoning is now particularly disingenuous given that it is aPzi@L9@--W620.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15,2021 Page 7 contradicted by the following statement included on page 208 of the June 16, 2021 City Council packet: "The data shows that the majority of the City's existing industrial stock consists of smaller units. 65% of the units (521) are under 30,000 square feet and 75% (602) are under 50,000 square feet. It is not the intent to more heavily regulate these smaller industrial uses, but rather to encourage them to locate and thrive here in Rancho Cucamonga. Fiscally, these smaller industrial uses employ more people per acre, produce more revenue per acre (sales and property tax), and have equal or lower impacts per acre than most of the larger industrial uses." The Project site is less than five acres in size and is developed with an approximately 8,000 square foot building, and is therefore within the category of "smaller industrial uses" that the City purportedly wishes to encourage based upon their unique characteristics. Yet, auto and vehicle storage uses are now inexplicably proposed to be banned City-wide even though their operational characteristics do not significantly differ from an enclosed warehouse use (and in fact, typically result in fewer impacts than a warehouse). The supporting materials in the June 16, 2021 City Council staff report also fail to provide any rational basis or justification for unfairly targeting this use. Conclusion Based on the foregoing, Brookfield has demonstrated that the Planning Director and Planning Commission's denial of the CUP and subsequent appeal for the Project was arbitrary and capricious and entirely lacking in evidentiary support. The denial was based on prejudicial reasons and clearly based on proposed Development Code amendments which were not in effect and had not even yet been introduced at the time of Project denial. Therefore, the City's denial of the project was an abuse of discretion and failed to follow the procedures required by law. Both the Planning Director and Planning Commissions decisions were based on considerations entirely outside the scope of the required findings then in effect, despite the fact that as demonstrated in ample materials provided by Brookfield, the Project meets each and every one of the CUP findings under the Code. To deny the property owner the lawful use of their property in this manner amounts to an unconstitutional taking. We appreciate the City's processing of this appeal and look forward to a just and fair hearing on the Project before the City Council to avoid the need for costly and protracted litigation. However, we are prepared to bring legal action and are confident that a reviewing court would find favorably for Brookfield in light of the entire record and the suspicious timing and circumstances surrounding the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga June 15, 2021 Page 8 Project's CUP denial and proposed Ordinance No. 982. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, !V ,,: 7 r� I` f j Matthew Wm.Nelson, of GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN &TILDEN, A Professional Corporation BR-agye--32Q20.1 Exhibit A Page 330 Current Findings Under Develoyment Code Section 17.16.120 D. Findings.The director shall approve,or approve with conditions,an application for a conditional use permit after finding all of the following.If the director does not make all of these findings,he/she shall deny the conditional use permit: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code,Municipal Code,general plan,and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. 2. The site is physically suited for the type,density,and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities,and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest,health,safety,convenience,or welfare, or materially injurious to persons,property,or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Proposed Findings Under Ordinance No.982 (New Section 17.20.060 would require CUPS to be considered by Planning Commission) E.Findings.The approving authority shall make the following findings before approving a conditional use permit application: 1.The proposed use is consistent with the general plan. 2.The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the development code and the purposes of the applicable zoning district as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. 3.The site is physically suitable for the type,density,and intensity of the use being proposed,including access,utilities,and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. 4.The design,location,size and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. 5.Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to detrimental to the public interest,health,safety, convenience,or welfare,or materially injurious to persons,property,or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The factors to be considered in making this finding include: a.Property damage or nuisance arising from noise,smoke,odor,dust,vibration or illumination caused by the use; b.Hazard to persons or property from possible explosion,contamination,fire or flood caused by the use;and, c.Significantly increase the volume of traffic or negatively alter the pattern of traffic. 6.The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services,including police,fire,streets,and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use;and 7.The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Page 331 # k � _ ƒ 2 \ d / f \ / (n _ _ _ = & 2 \ LH ( \�2 2 = E 2 \ ( 22/ a / 2 CL k - 2 _ - ) - ® k 2 - 2 A \ u § 0 a 3 ( .0 / i / 2 (n § # \ k < e k ƒ 4-1 g \ \ = mg y \ / i e m e a) = e $ / \ 0 / \ j K � 5 a. Co f � z .2- CD tL0 77 \ / 2 CL E o \ E < JQ J / CDI / f 0 \ z J / « ®0 a 0 \ \ ƒ \ \ »dd �» oA / k \ \j\ , . . »�\ k \U) S § J a \ J / Page 332 CITY HALL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (111,10A MONcA 909,477-2700 Receipt Number: 89651 Date; 6/16/2021 3:08 PM Cashier Id: cash2 41613-Accela_13-lanning Fees DRC2021-00213 GL-1001000-4508 $2,740.00 A1078-Accelajechnolo& Fee-Permit DRC2021-00213 GL-1020000.4517 $192.00 A4518-GEN PLAN MAINT FEE DRC2021-00213 GI-1016000.4518 $274.00 CC $3,206.00 Total Paid: $3,206.00 Received From: MARK OSTOICH Page 333 RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00439, A REQUEST TO OPERATE AN AUTO AND VEHICLE STORAGE USE WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9910 6T" STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-211-42 AND 43. (DRC2021-00213). A. Recitals. 1. Joonas Partanen with Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking, filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga denied Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439, and made findings supporting that decision. 3. On May 12, 2021, Joonas Partanen with Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking ("Appellant"), filed a timely appeal of the Planning Director's decision denying the application (DRC2021-00159). 4. On June 9, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted Resolution No. 21-38 to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Director's decision to deny the application and making the findings of support thereof. 5. On June 16, 2021, the Appellant filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the application to the City Council (DRC2021-00213). 6. On August 4, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings of support thereof. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 4, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Attachment 3 Page 334 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX APPEAL DRC2021-00213— Brookfield Properties AUGUST 4, 2021 Paqe 2 a. The applicant, Joonas Partanen, on behalf of H.E.R. Trucking Inc. is requesting to operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage facility at a 4.55 acre site which is improved with an existing 8,888 square foot industrial building within the General Industrial (GI) District at 9910 6th Street—APN: 0209-211-42 and 43. b. The Conditional Use Permit is for the storage of trucks and trailers consisting of a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' wide dry vans, and refrigerator trailers. c. The proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage facility proposes to operate 7 days a week, Monday to Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with truck trips occurring between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The site will be used to park a fleet of 3-axle tractors, 53' dry vans, refrigerator trailers and storage containers. All equipment will be on site when off duty and only 50% of the fleet is on site. The maximum number of vehicles is anticipated to be approximately 70 tractor &trailers. No goods will be stored at the facility. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including all written and oral testimony, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is allowed within the applicable zoning district but does not comply with the applicable provisions of the general plan. The project does not comply with multiple goals and policies of the general plan. Specifically,the project does not comply with Goal ED-1, Policy ED-1.3,Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.1, Goal LU-6, and Policies LU-6.1 and LU-6,4 of the General Plan: • Goal ED-1 requires that the City "achieve and maintain a diverse and sustainable economic base." Policy ED-1.3 further"encourage(s)the re-use of vacant warehousing facilities and other sites in Industrial zoned areas to attract new, innovative industries, particularly green technology." The General Plan continues by noting that while the exact type of business considered to be "green tech" might change over time, "...the City will continue to support the development of new buildings and reuse of existing buildings to accommodate the evolving spatial needs of innovative firms." The project proposes the re-use of a 4.55-acre site for Auto and Vehicle Storage which had previously been used as a recycling center. The applicant proposes to re-use the 4.55-acre site and the existing industrial building located on-site to accommodate the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use.The re-use of the project site in such a manner does not comply with the General Plan as it fails to "attract new, innovative industries," let alone one that focuses on green technology. Dedicating the site to the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would prevent the City from attracting new innovative industries which could otherwise locate at the subject site if it were redeveloped into an industrial park similar to other parcels of approximately the same size and zoning designation. Furthermore, Auto and Vehicle Storage is not considered a green technology. • Goal LU-1 requires that the City "ensure (that) established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of residents. Policy LU-1.1 further provides that the City must "protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a n�eg�ative impact on the residential living environment." The proposed Aurco �%ehicle CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX APPEAL DRC2021-00213— Brookfield Properties AUGUST 4, 2021 Paqe 3 storage meets no discernable community need for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, which is contrary to Goal LU-1. As previously discussed, and pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements By Base Zoning District), the Development Code within the subject zoning permits a variety of uses which meet community needs including restaurants, broadcast and recording studios, garden centers and/or plant nurseries, home improvement supply stores, etc. Staff notes that Table 17.30.030-1 also permits other community serving uses upon approval of a CUP, such as indoor entertainment, indoor fitness and sports facilities and childcare facilities, etc. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would meet no such community need and developing the entire site with the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use as proposed by the applicant would prevent this property from being developed with a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses which can occur on a parcel of this size and within this zone as evidenced by other parcels within the vicinity that have been developed with various other community serving uses which meet the needs of residents. • Goal LU-6 "promote(s) the stability of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods" whereas Policy LU-6.1 "continue(s) to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs, and Policy LU-6.4 "support(s) infrastructure improvements that encourage investment in Southwest Rancho Cucamonga." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga has been historically underserved by restaurants and other neighborhood serving uses. The development pattern of Southwest Rancho Cucamonga can be characterized by industrial uses interspersed with existing single-family residential neighborhoods. This mix of incompatible land uses within proximity to each other can diminish the quality of life within residential neighborhoods. The proposed Auto and Vehicle storage meets no discernable community need for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, which is contrary to Goal LU-6. As previously discussed, and pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements By Base Zoning District), the Development Code permits a variety of uses which may be considered to meet community needs including restaurants, broadcast and recording studios, garden centers and/or plant nurseries, and home improvement supply stores, etc. Staff notes that Table 17.30.030-1 also permits other community serving uses upon approval of a CUP, such as indoor entertainment, indoor fitness and sports facilities and childcare facilities, etc. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use would meet no such community need and developing the entire site with the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use as proposed by the applicant would prevent this property from being developed similar to those surrounding parcels which are similarly situated and which are within the same zone which have been found house a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses for the benefit of the residents, particularly within southwest Rancho Cucamonga where residential neighborhoods historically have existed within close proximity to incompatible industrial uses. While Policy LU-6.4 discusses infrastructure improvements that encourage investment in southwest Rancho Cucamonga, it also acknowledges the critical importance of the area's services and buildings in improving and maintaining the stability and vitality of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. In the case of the subject project, the applicant proposes an Auto and Vehicle Storage with the GI District which the Development Code identifies as the zone "Designate(d)..%RNkidest CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX APPEAL DRC2021-00213— Brookfield Properties AUGUST 4, 2021 Paqe 4 range of light and medium industrial activity." As previously noted, surrounding parcels which are similarly situated, and which are within the same zone have been found to house a variety of local and community serving businesses and uses for the benefit of the residents. The existence of these dynamic and varied uses creates a vitality which is critical to the stability of not only the immediate neighborhood, but to the whole of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Permitting the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use which meets no discernable community need may adversely affect the vitality of this area, and therefore destabilize the community identity of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Further, the project is not in compliance with Development Code Section 17.02.010.D, which requires that"use ofland or buildings for which an application is required pursuant to this title is to be approved for processing unless it is consistent with the land use element of the general plan." As the project is inconsistent with the land use and economic development elements of the general plan, the project is not in compliance with Development Code Section 17.02.010.D. Therefore, the proposed use does not comply with all applicable provisions of the zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. b. The site is not physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use. The site is not suited for the proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use. A single- family residential neighborhood is located approximately 1,400 feet to the west of a single-family residential neighborhood. Notably immediately to the east of the project site, is an industrial park which contains a brewery (Rowdy's Brewery). Other uses within the vicinity of the project include, but are not limited to, a variety of neighborhood-serving uses such as a church, restaurants, personal service businesses such as barber shops and massage businesses and professional offices. The proposed Auto and Vehicle Storage use is incompatible with the surrounding uses as it would likely increase traffic, air pollution and noise as explained in subparagraph c below, which would be detrimental to the lower intensity uses which surround the subject site. Therefore, the site is not physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use. c. Granting the permit will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. ). The proposed use involves the big-rig trucks entering and exiting the proposed facility at an entrance that is adjacent to the outdoor dining patio for Rowdy's Brewery, a location where families and residents are known to congregate. Locating the proposed use immediately next to uses such as this creates conflicts which could include traffic, air pollution and noise. For example, the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project anticipates 18 truck trips per day, which is based on approximately 21 employees. At the June 9, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant provided new evidence which suggests that the number of employees would be approximately 97 individuals. It is anticipated that this increase in the number of employees would result in additional traffic, including truck trips, which was not analyzed as part of the Traffic Impact Assessment. Further, common impacts associated with truck and trailer traffic include increased particulate matter which reduces air quality, as well as increased noise impacts associated which such uses, which could include loading dock activity and truck movements such as engines starting and stopping, engine idling, and frequent vehicle braking. Therefore, the granting of the permit will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4)as a project that is disapproved by the City. The City Council concurs with the Planning Department's determination. Page 337 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-XX APPEAL DRC2021-00213— Brookfield Properties AUGUST 4, 2021 Paqe 5 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the Appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's decision to deny Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00439. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, Joonas Partanen, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4t" DAY OF AUGUST 2021. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 338 9910 61h Street CUP Appeal to City Council August 4, 2021 Project Background • Applicant: Brookfield Properties, on behalf of H . E . R. Trucking; • Project: Request for CUP to operate Auto and Vehicle Storage. • CUP denied by Planning Director on May 4, 2021; • Applicant appealed to PC on May 12, 2021; • CUP and appeal denied by PC on June 9, 2021; • Applicant appealed to City Council on June 16, 2021. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject Property ry _ 1 a r `* t r r,.r rdn a w -maw 1 r ■ w ■ w ■ t w e . , 1 ': r ! r �1 �� ■ or �■ w r ■ w ■ ■ ■ ■ w 1 ■ w ■ %,= in /• '11 i 1 I Y' �I �� � � r r • 1 ♦ rN 1 ♦ ♦ r r r r ( r l r 6"N r r r r 1 1 r t • � ._.. 1 I I I I I 1 �:. ............. r r r r r r I � r r r r r r +••� , I r r r r � r c t r r r'r I r t r l l r l _ y ^ l II II r r r. r. r 1 r r r v� _��.,—=•�—='�—sr. ,_s,:, z�,k. - ia`='' '"�'7. �"a r '"���i;. A"' `f"- - `�.�,� � ae� .� A a.,�t.:. ',a+"��+ 5 �_�,. �- E Subject Property V'l ------------ 71 4 S Y`-res„ �g'"� k .�,r } � � ,;9• -, c r ';X r y �,, r _ _ - " V FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS' [�i::lw.m'Rm�.dwn�x iH E�P°RNIAEN �� wP—a�m — —.,r, m �� Fe OHEOR MOPE Ol1X�EOPFMT�p°NS HU6E MPR[AMFL FORIXI8Bl11dNFBLNH66E I 1' oa -�� I I&mewl ev[m xwnw®Ix�NavNorrxs rmm�cnN[ I I I I � 1 I x�,�NY,.N°N�LNvw„TMMN�N.�xE, II I I V '�! �Af� I I n�,�LY°µox�YMNuinRi°LIRE PPEroTPR�mL„PNLLR„�, ql x,:RLIr.�ELE.«wN°E. ENINEE,ti J `$1 1 eRR � L I �f I eoS a I } 8 l _ I � j xnlan ELocR JJ " I �Er�ova� i °ixa�E�a,oPr a,eo�elsr° [�I Ln R7 Lonwxc --- I --- ® � I I 0 CVIM STREET rrrnars�orrurur.uen n°n®ieL�na I (E)BUILDING ENLARGED FLDDR PLAN N ED ,8°Og FAX SITE PLAN I" HAVENAVENUE,SUITE 190 BROOICFIELD RANCHO CUCAMONGA,G.A91730 LOGISTICS J�L 999.259.9971 �� 9910 SIX P TH ST. 909,9°6 Fax, r.aLaw RANCHOCVCAMONGA,CA REVISED':2021.03�31 —Tco,vsrlcewmeL ensrcaysT A,inii°°oEial A2338 202D.12,D1 w .Amwrkch.wm June 9 2021 Public Hearing • Planning Commission voted (4-0, 1 absent), to deny the CUP and uphold the Planning Director's decision to deny the project. • Concerns from the Planning Commission included : • Incompatibility and impact of use upon surrounding uses within 6t" Street neighborhood; • Failure to meet General Plan goals and policies; • Failure to meet the City Council's expectation of Rancho Cucamonga as a "world-class community," emphasizing the need for the Commission to carefully evaluate projects which do not meet General Plan goals and policies. • new information provided at the June 9t" meeting regarding employment figures would exacerbate impacts of project. Applicant 's Appeal to City Council Applicant's appeal to City Council : • 1) Claims that the "real reason" for denial was an attempt to unlawfully apply a "retroactive" application of code provisions not yet in effect, a reference to recently adopted Ordinance 982. • 2) Claims that the decision to "unfairly" target auto and vehicle storage uses is not supported by substantial evidence. Analysis • Proposed use requires a CUP, which is a discretionary action. These types of decisions require findings to be made. Simply applying for a CUP does NOT mean an automatic approval in the event that a project meets technical development standards. • Conducting a discretionary review allows staff and decision makers the opportunity to consider the context of a project, its potential impacts on the surrounding properties, and whether or not a project meets the goals and policies of the general plan. • In this case, there are two primary concerns: • 1) zoning/impacts to surrounding properties; • 2) inconsistency with General Plan land use/economic development goals and policies. B s in Rd B =e Rtl a L[ R BeselLl Rtl Ba .Lne Pd 4i Rd .�. n a� a m T VISA � ,�- '� N MI I - x Churc 5[ _- i LJ— Fuca �onga fry'" � 7 r.—`� I. ,' I s'� r �;� ,5` -• - _ `�� � rmw Aoat = a ,r .= ■�Illil h riL), Arrow Rau[+ a' Arrowut_ „ - m 3r,; w wA , Kaiser, r—ii � Z ..� ti Y F,..'i; r_ - Fourth51 — A -` Sa�Be•�a�a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r _+ C S U o _ ti D International USA 3 ManarchBeauty,Group �^ - � - rT .. m Ha Famil.Br wery a. m _ -_�. - . .-�:: aryw�ll suPPlY store qr - air Safari $ N edpls Ars National Services p I tting I o s m p - Multi Sales 3 - eaB r s � � Gen Scheu Business Center f n "1 Gold Veterin Hospital • FACTORY RADIO .ICE&REPAIR ; ._.rY I-1 InW Mo1urC I Radiator 3: Q Epigl. dl Pe I"saaai Nip sloe T _ m- m - Quality Male Ea i r tionG .Case Paper_., .� ' GPM Hdndling In Ranch puters � cc t Sulvic's Floral De igns �., - Gel e .. - Imm, Me I Eons Ad. ' 'corape .� _ ASAP Pgvrersporls tnW Oon Ns., 5 p }�7 At as Testing B C orsports 8 1 � SiDance Terrific Laboratories yr r, =Tv n et I o ' m Affordable Hollow - w AST it(. o" AAtreatl Media'~ —'� iul Park <Melal Doorsi'&fral es i + i i� D I 5isn P i StaGkz Dlcki�, into I Zaokn" esr,v Co IM Breakers SupplleS5i ilary axl 8 �' alifrinpire 'CP ustgin � _ , SNVHAIR. - � {v��s.Eofle ePrims Sc e . �I I / '+1,. -•'i __�. Express amlenerslnc Danyennand .` �� suoPlemenlsstore g u,•':,,."•,.6;hSl Woodworking bthSt 6 _.�.__.._b • fith St Gth St 6t St 6th t bl7 St '{� � Ih St bth St p} Fy}I deco4sule.cum 8 Trunspuci 1' ti r oP industrial Suppi ,• �., 1. 3 I GtI. x Maur ion _ �r l A � us�Oln alssing & nd" Mari urse �4 IIND 1 5< � � I k iwtry��i�.,h r ii Al 2 41 PARK dr Jft Sixth Street Industrial Park �- F p w u C _ (East of Project Site) 3 I ..�: 95 r�cC y �; � �T \ � b. ,�''44�'q 1J +'S s� 3k \ -� ' •� ` _ L.�'�i����� ��_",��:f 5:���"F:�t.;�d:3' ?��`} 6�,c�,�. :�''•!��''fi��s , �� �..;F:.a+w ��,.�����?1a'�f�N�.�._. e y.. � �.� ,«\ _+ C S U o _ ti D •International USA 3 Monarch BVeauty,Group rT .. m Ha Famil.Br wery a. m _ -_�. - ' •'4 . .-�:: Dry wall suPPIY air Safari $ N `` r edpls Ars National Services r p - Multi Sales 3 - ' �: r .. � � Gen r a Schea Business Center f `' -As Gold Gold Veterin Hospital FACTORY RADIO .ICE&REPAIR AK; - _. OMER f D I lnW Mo1urC 1 Radialor 3: - iuku r «gyp o du ry u EPOPRWti Pa CS� I""a"i 7snp sloe'-_.. m. 4ualily Male ri Lion G Case Paper Hdndling In r y GPM Ra*;hplil � Sulvia's tlrvral Designs Ion$ Ad'> Don t• ' I �rs•' s ASAP Povrersporls• - .p �: ,` At as Te$ting B C orsports I • t I Laboratories ravt�r� =,TVSn;,p • Sixlhslreet "e Dance Terrific ' �e industrial Park AffarMetil u6le Hollow - i� AST GNS ' AAtreatl Media'� A-0elal Doorsr8 frai es i + i I' D I SlewNJ appY i ke'cutackz Di n$on, into ZonA�B CoM&MucuitBreakers D as5i IIIIFFaaEleeln sl pPlY9mre GLt �pirCP�ust r�P.inSNVH g - Y ;e.s.EoflegePrimsSce �•, Express Fasteners Inc oplemenls star t: 5th St 6t St 6th 0l7 St 6,11 St 6th St 6th 51 bth St deco4sule.cum Trai pacific • • in snap Y Industrie Suppi ! " JIlL. Deli Commercial/Industrial Park • IMP 7 st Be • z O Ali of ng: nd' t � i i l Ma!a NunE Realty DRE•A�01 D. i. Y s' 2 _ r � }�.�� iyr•.� rtj'{ ''slaw'^y�X' ,� ! .5�. h 4 � a AA 4 \ M ' h ti�gF�nsg -- •_ :, 710 aw— T r.14 f . Park 3 <, 2 Site) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r U o _ ti D International USA 3 MonarchBeauty,Group rT .. m Ha Famil.Br wery a. m _ -_�. - . .-�:: aryw�ll suPPlY store qr - air Safari $ N Ars National Services r Multi Sales . , 3 . _ ea B Gen Scheu Business Center f ���••��� a - , n � Gold 6 Velerin Hospital • FACTORY RADIO .ICE&REPAIRlka Omni T Q EPOPRWol Pa rs I'�s,api 7snr sto=e { m ➢_ _ Quality Maier Ea e 6 Hdndlirl In i r lien G ;:' ease Pa r �GPM A v Ra ch paters Con t # _ Sxilvias- I r DE �f �� - Me I ions et rJ. -crrspe { . ASAP Powersports� W Oon I � }�7 At as Testing B C orsports ii 1 � IQr� Terrific Laboratories r.+eter� =Tv n;,r DanceTerri Sixthstreet m Affurdable Hollow - w ffiASRGNS ho" T ` AAtreatl Media'~ —'� industrial Park <Metal Doorsi'8 fral esSign P,4i yM� L� 4 $taeki Dlekfns'an. inter I ZowB"ysBre':vCo M� itBreaker Supplies5i lilary axl 8 alii mpire CP ustgp in q {usCoegePrims Sc e- SNVHAIR• Dan ennand f. Express Fasteners Inc oplemenlsstore bth St bth St 6t St 6th t bt r St 6;11 St Gth St 6th 51 bth St Transpacific �• deco4sale.cum industrial Suppi `. Ip u encan Foam&ahr�e ion IMP ustorn I - aising nd i - ➢ t m JL - Mari!aNun e Realty DRE401 ._t ➢ '•T i. Y n II_ 2 , 1!r _ - a TAX 4.0 AM Iw §1 ^ °A BusinessArchibald th (NE Corner of Archibald and 6 Street low r . C U y m �Maxxis n y p International 115A 3 Monarch'�Bedut Group �^ �• � �� - • _ Hr •Famil.Br wery m a -. — •'�:` Dry wall supPlY store q - Hairsafari 9 $ N o1R' _ `r f de•Is Ars National Services r a Pr�lyrLting I lore ?. Multi SalesGen 3 m Scheu Business Center N A � Golden Veterin Hospital FACTORY RADIO y V .ICES,REPAIR ; ._. Y •� t r e o IIIOmni D RadralOr 3: Epig1P'. BI Pa C p i I'asmrn a snp Blare 8,` - D. r Quality Maleri EL i r tiOn Gr �. _ r _ �BSe Par ` � G. - Hdndiing In n .. A_ Rancho amputers rAm t I } 1 Snlvisr DE Ms I Iona cei,ery .� f D p Don t• Irsp s ASAP Po wersports� .p grid�l0ldrl 5 as Testing B C arsports 8 6 Dance Terrific ,- boratorie�_ , r.Ivr�r, =,TVSh;,� • Sixlhstreet 5�GN5 w - -- _• -_ �- AAtreat �" industrial Park Meta D- E BFra s' ' a py Massag I �' Th Stackz Dlckluson, inito I i Takeout Zonad`y s Bre,v Co _ At e.Circuit Brea ker Supplies Si iilary M&M ra 8 alif rlp Is I CP ust•` P in SNVHAIR. - u �p s.Eir l...Pr s I Sc e Dan errnand r. - - . Express Fasteners Inc 6Vaudworkin l rg - - I► - suPPlemenlsstore ... y ... NIL t - 61hgSt ' �bfhS 6ih t ol7 St 6;h Si 6th St -'{ 6th St 6th St D i " '"�-�- Transpadfia --" d 1COA.le.com _ , Industrial'Suppl r ' Rancho Business Plaza ` Maie + � Disc i IMPnew B I. ustom Reliable D h r A J wising �..; iiy IF �i i _ Maria - 5 r Realty DRE"#,01 n 1 � , .- �� �_ _ a l��' _ ���r � � �� �\�`l = hr/�f1� _ � 1 i � i� ���-'�'� a_ g b.��y�• MS All AV \� r• r r. / Rancho Business 9201-9303 • . • Avenue L: c S U Manarch Beauty,Group y'- m •Maxxis International USA Iiiii&'v Ha Famil.Br wery a. •"�,c Dry wall supPlY store r. - P Lill" i y ,� Pri ing BusinessScheu D u o I i 3 Scheu Business Center a I � n Gold Veterin Hospital -FACTORYRAIO REPAIR .Shc� ._. Y ��,�h-b",qR• • q ..., lam I III n -IlnW MoluMCA dialor I 3:' T - luku srnu Q EPOPIRWelPe C9� j� -I'asaapi 7snp store m- m Quality Male ion so Case Paper �t Hdndlingln- i, GPM' n V; .+�■ pi 8 Ra ch puters m Sulvia's flrcrdl Deigns - dMa 1 Eons .- 'con _>n Don ASAP Puwersporls W _ rs� 5 }�7 at as Testing B C orsporls 8 ' 1 � •. Iv� 6an�eTerrific . Laboratories hIalon = i h.r • Sixth street Affurduhle Hollow - w IGN5 —�� industrial Park <tlgetal Doors�B Prat Ps h T ` .AA tre Me is hq � � 1St $tackz YM Dlckl�, inilD I ZonB"y s Bre,v Co M' OIr¢�tt6reaker 5upplles 5, iilary ax isw�r9m �` • f,• GSif rin' pii EP�ust`rtPrjin SNVHAIR {vtCoU7a'gePrims Sc e Express Fasteners 's Inc Ddnger rand �� _ suoPlemenlsstore ' u,.,..,.,,...6:11 St Woodworking Gth St 6tSt 6t 6th St .�.__..._b 6 _ fith St h 1 bl7 St '{I � th 51 bth St • p} decu4sule.cum 8 Transpacific ;• 1 ti oP Indi Supp! " 031L �T .,� �1.Ow1 j It 1 r � IYO `m I ■ :.: x Maur i ion us�m r ' � � A � • als�pg r. ncl JL �a .Mar! urge I „•5< la�o 1 - t` I � r � 3 � I I 2 - NEW 7. lo fir ii Er"t � I' N" JAK77 `•'� xW��� � r 7�� p, �,f ,�.• --, k sue` ,@-j"`[>• r tiTY.j.� �Et a :. :. 111i St 7th St -71h°StF 1' a • Mai S International JSA MonarchrBAuty GroupHamilton Family Brewery ��• "' ,_ `m Dry wsr supply stare r "-y.. Hair Safari ' � Pro edwls Ars National o s • I .� .���'9 & D Pr�iyrLtl g Multi Sales - -.• i. Gen"' ,° o Scheu Business Center Q r y D U. Veterin Hospital FACTORY RADIO M"IEICE&REPAIR D I -- a.■w.__�__-__, iveLine i g Radiator GVJC Packa h;�hsr+p Wistor•hop _ If du rr Eplgl. el Pe C5. I'acmnra sup store I m •n i _ - 8 ;- �. Ouality Male ri Ea Handling In lion Case Ps .� GPM • :Y Ranch paters Cpm. rh{' _ SxilvivlIN D� r pu re1ASAP � . '. Me 0.16ffona 9 nW' Do s Powersports ,�;: Tr', IfP. p = oldt }�7 AtiasTesting' 11,', B C otorsporls 8 r r •.• r�� Dance Terrific Laboratones ,-0 r.+vlur� Izr=,Ti ynpp • Sixlhslreet �E Induslrlal Park m a; 'AAcre ion &Frames yMas . Sta ckz - Dlckfason Janilai, Rom B"s Bre�,v Co I M&MGrcuit Breakers - Supplies Sanoary rda µi' -�. ' EI .r+cal pplrsrore ,'�: - ,,yy s� -611 _ 4Gfe InlandlEpire CP CustomPruits _ _ • • ColleyePnnlssc e•I .'• SNVHAIR [utamin {' � + s.iaplemenls sln'e '1! 7 ■ ^6t h,stlmpmwlqmmp� 6th t 6ttl St 61h St bth St A 5lh S1 6th St om A ` Transpadfic Ind ustrial'Supply IML Ainencan Foam&Fabric' tF `r . `m G.I a Mare 0n B ussorn •it l A � � alsin9 & nd' ` `' I I — > r .Mari urge '� u IIND t • . 1. i� - lei r.. ow o s i aJim � � F.�wq #ll�n.®gin. M®N rA6 - D E' i a f fp. ' ri 41 ]M i. I 1 / INN. A. a .n 1 11r■ .�s _ •4�--... - d � � .—_lam -� �.— — �... Incompatibility wit Genera P an Project fails to comply with following General Plan goals and policies: • Goal ED-1 : Policy ED-1 .3 • Goal LU-1 : Policy LU-1 . 1, Policy LU-6. 1, Policy LU-6.4 Development Code Section 17.02.010 provides, in part: "No use of land or buildings for which an application is required is to be approved for processing unless it is consistent with the land use element of the general plan." Noticing and Recommendation • Notices mailed, published and posted on July 21, 2021; • No responses to the notices for the City Council meeting. • Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the subject Conditional Use Permit. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Questions/Comments ? (Q1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing for Consideration of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 — Alan Smith for Arbor Express Car Wash — A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project-Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non-Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208-291-01 and 0208-291-02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to a Proposed Car Wash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-045) (CITY) (Continued from June 2, 2021 City Council Meeting) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2021-045 denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. BACKGROUND: On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to approve Design Review DRC2018- 00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 for the site plan, design review, and operation of a 5,078 square foot car wash and 1,296 square foot detailing center on 1.36 acres of land. The Planning Commission also recommended City Council approval of the Related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments that are necessary to permit the car wash use and to rezone adjacent land to accommodate the loss of residential density on the parcel where the car wash would be located. The Planning Commission's approval of the Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Tree Removal Permit are contingent upon the City Council approving the proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments. One Planning Commissioner voted in opposition to the project based on their determination that a car wash and detailing center were not the highest and best use for the project site. A timeline for this project is attached as Attachment 3. Correspondence received by Applicant supporting their request is attached as Attachment 5. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The Page 339 "L" shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The proposed car wash project would be known as the "Arbors Car Wash." It would be an automated express type of car wash. The car wash would comprise two parcels (APN 0209-291- 06 and APN 0208-291-03). One parcel is currently zoned General Commercial (GC) with a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (Parcel 1). Parcel 1 is currently vacant. The other parcel is currently zoned Low Medium (LM) with a General Plan Land Use designation of Low Medium Residential (Parcel 2). Parcel 2 is currently occupied by a single-family residence. Parcel 2's zoning and land use designation do not permit car washes. In order to accommodate the car wash, the applicant has applied for Zoning Map amendment and General Plan amendment to change Parcel 2 to General Commercial so that both Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 would have the same zoning and General Plan land use designation. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments would also change the zoning/land use designation of two separate parcels (APNs 0208-9-01 and -020), one of which is currently occupied by a single-family residence and the other which is vacant (Parcels 3 and 4, respectively). These parcels are currently zoned Low Medium with a General Plan land use designation of Low Medium Residential. Parcels 3 and 4 would not be developed with the proposed car wash. Instead, Parcels 3 and 4 are proposed to be rezoned to accommodate higher residential density for purposes of satisfying a State law referred to as "No-Net Loss," which effectively precludes the City from reducing the residential density of sites within the City unless it offsets that loss on other sites. In order to offset the loss of 6.8 potential units on Parcel 2 due to its change from Low Medium to General Commercial, Parcel 3 and Parcel 4, which total 1.21 acres, must be upzoned to accommodate an equivalent number of units, going from a potential residential density of 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Site Single-Family Low Medium (LM) Residence Low Medium Residential Residential District 4-8 du/acre North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District 4-8 du/acre Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District (2-4 Center Civic/Regional du/acre East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District 4-8 du/acre West I Service Stationz General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 —"Beverly Hills House"(designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989)on APN:0208-291-03; 2—Non-operational but approved for reactivation August 15,2018 and undergoing building plans review to reopen Page 34e 2 ANALYSIS: In order for the conditional use permit, design review, and tree removal permit approved by the Planning Commission for Arbors Car Wash at the subject (project) location to take effect, a General Plan amendment is required, as well as a corresponding zone map amendment. This is needed specifically to redesignate the land use on the easternmost parcel (Parcel 2) from Low Medium to General Commercial. Land use entitlements such as conditional use permits must be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map. Therefore, the entitlements for the Arbors Car Wash were made contingent upon the City Council's approval of the proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments. In addition, the Zoning Map must be consistent with the General Plan, and so the requested Zoning Map amendment cannot be approved unless the General Plan amendment is concurrently approved. Therefore, staff's analysis focuses on the General Plan amendment, although many of the same issues would apply to the Zoning Map amendment. Staff has identified the following issues with the proposed General Plan amendment that inform the recommendation to deny these applications. Issue 1: Importance of the General Plan Land Use Element and Map to the Planning Process Staff believes an amendment to the general plan from one land use type to another is a weighty decision that should not be taken lightly. Since our early years, we have been known as "the City with a plan" and that commitment to being a well-planned city has returned great dividends in the areas of health, prosperity, and overall quality of life. The 2010 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is the City's legislative document that guides land use and development decisions with such a long-range view in mind. Many cities call their General Plan the "road map" or the "constitution" for the city. The adoption and amendment of a General Plan is a legislative action. The City Council has wide latitude in amending the General Plan, subject only to the limitation that its decision-making not be arbitrary or capricious. It is the prerogative of the City Council to make the decision whether or not to amend the General Plan. Typically, staff believes a General Plan amendment is appropriate when a project will advance a significant and important goal of the City that could not be met without the amendment. The City has numerous goals that might merit a General Plan amendment, such as the provision of new housing, especially affordable housing, a business that would generate a significant number of high-wage jobs, a business that would provide critical neighborhood services such as a grocery store, to diversify the city's economy, to provide for numerous, high wage jobs, and/or to provide for a substantial revenue stream that helps the City provide services. In summary, staff believes General Plan amendments are appropriate for new development or investment that improves neighborhoods and quality of life in the city. As an All-America City, Rancho Cucamonga has long been mindful about the type and locations of businesses in the city. District 2 tends to have more automobile-oriented uses, including a majority of both the city's car washes and the city's gas stations. The City's recent measures to further study such auto-related uses, which have historically dominated the economic development of District 2, indicate the opposite of a justification of a General Plan amendment for a car wash. It is not that car washes and other automobile-oriented uses are not important and do not have a role in the city's business mix; it is that they create impacts such as noise and traffic that are not compatible with certain uses such as residential uses and schools. Staff analysis: General plan amendments are only appropriate when an amendment furthers important goals of the City. The establishment of a new car wash does not rise to this level. There Page YNe 3 is no documented shortage of car wash facilities in Rancho Cucamonga at this time. Car wash facilities do not provide numerous jobs, high-wage jobs, bring a needed amenity to the neighborhood, bring a unique business to the city, provide affordable or attainable housing, or otherwise further the City's overarching goals. Issue 2: PlanRC Comprehensive General Plan Update The City began a two-year comprehensive General Plan update in January 2020. When adopted, this new long-range vision for future land use development will close the chapter on the 2010 General Plan and establish a vision for the next ten or more years. As an All-America City, one of our core community values is listening to the community. Extensive community outreach was conducted through meetings, discussion groups and surveys to better understand the community's land use and development goals. Through this process, the community articulated three core values to help guide community development: health, equity, and stewardship. Additionally, the community has identified five critical priorities for the city: 1. Design for people first 2. Provide connectivity and accessibility 3. Create destinations 4. Establish Rancho Cucamonga as the cultural and economic hub of the Inland Empire 5. Address environmental justice The public review draft of PlanRC reflects the goals articulated by the community. It has been released in draft form prior to public hearings and adoption, which are scheduled to take place in Fall 2021, and staff has conducted extensive public engagement around the draft plan. While community feedback is still ongoing at the time of this writing, feedback on the draft thus far has been very positive. The draft plan indicates that the Archibald and Arrow intersection, including the subject property is intended to be designated "Neighborhood Corridor." This designation was chosen with care to help address the community's values and realize the community's priorities. This designation discourages auto-dependent land uses in favor of commercial businesses that serve the local community and can be accessed without requiring an automobile. Improving walkability helps address health, equity, and stewardship. In addition, this commercial corner is adjacent to the proposed Cucamonga Town Center Focus Area, which envisions enhanced commercial and industrial uses at a walkable, neighborhood scale. Together, these proposals help to create a people-first destination that is connected to and accessible by the surrounding neighborhoods. Furthermore, as stated above, car washes and many other auto-oriented businesses are predominantly in District 2. Further saturating certain types of businesses in one area of the city is both inequitable and a fragile approach to economic development that is not in line with the community's values or the ideal of an All-America City. There are other locations in the city which are identified as potential locations for any increased demand in auto-related uses that might result from a growing residential population. Staff analysis: At the time of the Planning Commission's review of this application, PlanRC was still being prepared and the community's vision had not yet been fully translated into a land use plan or policies. Additionally, staff did not yet have the benefit of hearing from the community to understand whether the draft PlanRC would be well received by the community. Staff now has both and can more fully assess the proposed General Plan amendment in the context of the community's vision as articulated by PlanRC. While PlanRC is but a draft plan, the requested General Plan amendment conflicts with the community's stated values and priorities. The community's future land use vision for Arrow and Archibald neighborhood, as proposed in the draft PlanRC Land Plan does not include auto-related Page 34e 4 uses. The General Plan update community engagement effort indicate the community greatly desires walkable, destination-oriented retail developments. The subject property will no longer be designated as LM Residential but is not proposed to accommodate a car wash use in the future designation either. Furthermore, as the comprehensive General Plan update is in process, staff asserts that this amendment to a single parcel of land is not timely. A project that is compliant with the current land use and zoning designation could be considered, but any reconsideration of land use on these parcels should only be considered as part of the comprehensive update. Issue 3: Legal Limit on the Number of General Plan Amendments As a way of signifying the importance of the long-range planning process, State law limits the number of amendments to mandatory elements of the General Plan a City can approve to four a year. The Land Use Element is a mandatory element of the General Plan. For 2021, the City has multiple General Plan amendments to the Land Use Element under way: the PlanRC comprehensive General Plan update (including the Land Use Element), as well as three major industrial projects (all of which are 500,000 SF to 2,200,000 sf and represent hundreds of millions of dollars of investment and thousands of jobs) that will require General Plan amendments to calibrate zoning designations for very large sites. In addition, the Housing Element update is contingent upon an amendment to the Land Use Element to designate sites on the housing inventory for residential development. In the absence of any other requests, these projects alone exceed the use of all four of the City's allowed amendments. Staff analysis: As stated above, staff does not believe a car wash is a land use that warrants the consideration of one of a limited number of allowable General Plan amendments. It is appropriate for the City Council to consider the application before it without comparing the relevant merits of other General Plan amendments. However, should the City Council approve the requested General Plan amendment, one more of the listed General Plan amendment requests would have to be delayed until 2022. Delaying the update of the City's Housing Element and General Plan until 2022 would impact the City's ability to regulate new residential development. Delaying the approval of any of the property owner-requested amendments for the referenced major industrial projects risks hundreds of millions of dollars of investment and thousands of jobs for the city. Issue 4: Redesignating Land Use from Residential to Commercial In 2017 the California Legislature approved California's 2017 Housing Package, which, among other housing bills, included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reducing a site's residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density on a site that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in determining compliance with housing element law unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need. In addition, the "Housing Crisis Act" adopted pursuant to SB 330, prohibits the City from enacting a "development policy, standard, or condition" to change the use of property to a "less intensive use" or reduce the intensity of land use from that allowed by the General Plan or zoning as of January 1, 2018. Under this law, a "less intensive use" would include changing the land use designation or zoning of property to prohibit residential development. However, there is an exception to this prohibition. When the City amends the General Plan and zoning to lower the intensity of use on one parcel, it must be offset by increases on other parcels "to ensure that there is no net loss in residential capacity." This provision applies City-wide and is not listed to sites on the City's housing inventory used by HCD. Pane 5 Page 34T Taken together, two laws mean that the City may only reduce or eliminate residential density for a parcel if there is a sufficient replacement of residentially zoned land so that there is"no net loss" of residential development capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85- acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity as a result of this project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations for Parcels 3 and 4, which are non-project related parcels (APNs: 208-29-01 and -02) as described previously. The subject 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land (Parcel 2) has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)zoning designation. Rezoning Parcels 3 and 4 (a total of 1.21 acres)from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the General Plan and zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 vs 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will, in turn, make the project compliant with the "no net loss" provision in Senate Bill Nos. 166 and SB 330. Staff analysis: Although the applicant has been able to identify residential capacity on other sites in order to avoid a net loss, as discussed above, such a re-designation is not without potential neighborhood impacts. Issue 5: Car Wash Use Adjacent to Low or Medium Density Residential Housing As stated in Issue 4, the General Plan Amendment requested would require a re-designation and re-zoning of the adjacent property to the east to a higher density residential land use and zone. If developed to its full potential, these residential properties would be located immediately adjacent to a car wash use. The noise of equipment, vehicles, and patrons at the site during operating hours as well as the environmental conditions of water spraying and air blowing, while not found to have significant environmental impacts under CEQA, with mitigation, are still conditions that are not ideal in a residential neighborhood or adjacent to a school. For the City Council to approve this General Plan Amendment, the Council would have to concurrently increase residential density immediately adjacent to the proposed car wash. Staff does not believe these are compatible land uses and so the amendment exacerbates a future conflict of land uses as more residents are allowed to be placed next to the car wash. Furthermore, while CEQA does not consider how impacts may disproportionally affect disadvantaged communities, introducing land use conflicts such as new sources of noise adjacent to an existing school and housing sites can create new environmental justice and equity issues. Staff analysis: Car wash uses are not compatible with residential neighborhoods. There are many other locations in the city of Rancho Cucamonga where a car wash could be located at a much further distance away from neighboring residences and schools. Summary In summary, staff cannot recommend the requested General Plan amendment and zoning map amendment to accommodate the development of a car wash due to the lack of consistency with the City's current and future land use goals, the lack of a demonstrated need for the use, and the PanPage 342F 6 lack of a clear community benefit that would be achieved by the project as well as the impact on other, larger projects currently in process. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of$4,862 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer-reviewed or confirmed. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. Even assuming the $4,862 figure is accurate, this amount is so minimal that within 2-3 years it will be eclipsed by costs and the project will go negative. Generally speaking, a commercial use on 1 acre or more should be contributing at $20,000 per acre or more to be comparable in average revenue to the City's other commercial uses, even on the low end of the analysis. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The request to make an amendment for a single property and for this proposed development project does not meet the Council's vision or core values. Additionally, this proposal does not address the community's core values or priorities as articulated through the PlanRC community outreach process. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on April 28, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (135 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 28, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Attachment 1 - Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 10, 2021 Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Minutes Dated March 10, 2021 Attachment 3 - Correspondence Received Attachment 4 - Draft Resolution No. 2021-045 Attachment 5 - Project Timeline Page 3Ze RANCHOCITY OF (a Mh - DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00533,ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536, &TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218 -ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1.36-acre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review DRC2018-00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. • Recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The project scope is for the site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center. Project approval is contingent on the approval of related General Plan/Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation of one of two parcels that makes up the project site from a residential land use/zoning designation (Low Medium (LM)) to a commercial land use/zoning designation (General Commercial(GC)). Based on the State of California's "no- net-loss" requirement, the loss of potential residential development on the one project Atta q4M4e n t 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00219 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 related parcel of land, requires that loss to be made up on other parcels in the city. The project includes rezoning two adjacent parcels of land to a higher residential density to make up for the lost potential residential units on the project site. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The "L" shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located on the parcel of land to the west of the project site, at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved the reactivation of this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and Zoning Map (DRC2015-00684 amendments changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial GC District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District 4-8 du/acre North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District 4-8 du/acre Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial GC District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District (2-4 Center Civic/Regional du/acre East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District 4-8 du/acre West I Service Station' General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 —`Beverly Hills House"(designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989)on APN:0208-291-03; 2—Non-operational but approved for reactivation ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a carwash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,078 square foot automated "express" car wash, and a separate Page 347 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 1,296 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The existing single- family residence on the project site will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The first floor of the carwash building is comprised of an enclosed carwash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 roll-up service doors, an office area, and a restroom. Three separate shaded canopies will be provided in the parking lot area with individual self-service vacuums, totaling 32 stalls along with 8 customer/employee parking stalls. The carwash is designed to recycle 86 percent of the wash water. Development Code Section 17.90.030-E (Drive-In and Drive-Through Uses) states that drive-through lanes are required to be set back 45 feet from the ultimate curb face and 300 feet from an intersection. Development Code Section 17.90.030 allows for deviations from the above provisions through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review. The development standards that apply to the project are as follows: Development Criteria Minimum Proposed Compliant? Requirement Building Setback (along Arrow Route 45 feet 78 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback from Street 45 feet 45 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback Intersection 300 feet 190 feet No* Rear Building Setback (at north property 0 feet 60 feet Yes line) Side Building Setback (at east property 20 feet 20 feet Yes line) Side Building Setback (at west property 5 feet 100 feet Yes line Parking Setback (along Arrow Route 25 feet 50 Feet Yes 45 feet Landscape Setback (average)/ 45 Feet Yes 30 feet (minimum) Landscape Coverage 10 percent 26 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 35 percent 11 Percent Yes maximum Deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review permit. Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 40 parking spaces. Land Use Required Parking Provided Parkin Car Wash/ Detail Center 16 Stalls 40 Stalls Page 348 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 Access to the site will be provided by a 40-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the carwash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The carwash and detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of "alumawood" arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of-way. B. General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2019-00534: The project includes a request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to change the General Plan land use and zoning designations for one parcel of land (APN: 0208-291- 03) within the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, and for two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APNs: 0208-291-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M)/Medium (M) Residential District, respectively. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California's 2017 Housing Package, which, among other housing bills, included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce or eliminate residential density for a parcel if there is a sufficient replacement of residentially zoned land so that there is "no net loss" of residential development capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity as a result of this project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations for two non-project related parcels (APNs: 208-29-01 and -02) as described previously. Page 349 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 5 The subject 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres)from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 vs 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will, in turn, make the project compliant with the "no net loss" provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments will also be compatible with the existing and future land uses surrounding the project site. The proposed car wash is designed to minimize potential impacts on the surrounding land uses. The vehicle entrance to the car wash will be shared with the adjacent service station and will be approximately 270 feet from the nearest residential land use. Noise making equipment related to the car wash and vacuum stations will be located within an enclosed equipment room, reducing noise levels below the maximum noise levels permitted for a residential land use. The car wash building will be positioned on a north-south axis, further reducing any potential noise or light impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center located to the north of the project site will provide a buffer between the proposed carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. The proposed General Commercial designation is compatible with the General Commercial designation to the south. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments increasing the permitted residential density of the non-project related parcel to the east will also not impact the continued use of the existing single-family residence (Beverly Hills House)for residential purposes. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's carwash needs and will support the surrounding community's needs as Arrow Route is identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The development of a car wash on the two project-related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. C. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536: Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, car washes are a Page 350 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 6 permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed carwash will employ approximately 25 full and part-time employees with 7 persons on the largest shift for both the carwash and detail center. The facility will operate 7 days per week from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with customers staying in their vehicle during the car washing and drying process. Complimentary self-serve vacuums will be available upon exiting the carwash tunnel. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of one of the parcels that make up the project site from Low Medium (LM)/ Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, carwashes are a permitted land use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed car wash is compliant with each of the applicable development standards of the Development Code. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is suitable for a car wash land use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Subject to the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the establishment of the carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. D. Tree Removal Permit (DRC2019-00218): The project includes a request for the removal of 17 trees. An Arborist Report (Steve Anderson, Arborist) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the 17 onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal. The removed trees will be replaced by 42 new trees as part of the proposed project. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on December 17, 2019. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised three design issues: 1) the use of Page 351 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 7 stone veneer on the east elevation of the carwash building; 2) the addition of stone veneer on the vacuum housing bases; and 3) the use of"alumawood" on the trellis structures. The committee recommended that stone veneer be added to the east elevation of the carwash building and that stone veneer not be added to the bases of the vacuum housing bases. The committee was also accepting of the use of"alumawood" on the trellis structures rather than real wood. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. The plans before the Planning Commission have been updated to reflect the recommendations by the Design Review Committee. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the RC Family Resource Center on April 29, 2019. Owners of property located within 660 feet of the project site were notified and invited to attend the meeting. No property owners/residents attended the meeting. G. Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $6,374 or pay an in-lieu fee to the City's public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy. H. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with Senate Bill 18 (SB18), notification was sent on October 16, 2018, to tribal communities from a list of seven tribes provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians) and requested any cultural studies that were prepared for the studies. The studies were forwarded to the two tribes and no further comment was received. Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on April 1, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by MIG, Inc and was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential impacts to migratory birds, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, and reduce noise impacts during the project's construction, as well as potential impacts that may be created upon operation of the development, such as traffic-related impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments Page 352 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 8 were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of$4,862 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement) by redeveloping two underutilized parcels of land. The project is also consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed car wash will complement the approved reestablishment of the existing service station to the west and is designed to minimize any impact on the surrounding land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Design Review and Conditional Use Permit for the proposed carwash as presented and recommend City Council approval of the related General Plan land use/ Zoning Map amendments. 2. Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed General Plan land use and Zoning Map amendments along with the related entitlements based on the determination that redesignating a residential property to commercial at this location is not consistent with the City's land use goals pursuant to the General Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on February 3, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (143 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on February 2, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Page 353 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit C - Business Operation Letter Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Comments (December 17, 2019) and Action Agenda Exhibit E - Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan Draft Resolution 21-15 Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 Draft Resolution 21-16 Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 Draft Resolution 21-14 of Approval for Design Review DRC2018-00535 Draft Resolution 21-12 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 Draft Resolution 21-13 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 Page 354 h ` 4 J' iAL 1 ite ARM ft5b, k i r Page 355 UISTING SCHOOL REVISIONS BY EXISTINGACCESS ROAD PROPOSED B'DECORATIVE BL llaw 2BOD DENSE LWOSCPff 0 ` 'J p EKISRNG PARKINGLOT o La a I F VAIIR 0)F u �o ash w c >w DECORAT O Z'v y� Q VAKIUGXT R IRON F J O - g m DRIVE W Q m 9g a PROPOBLOCK VALLRATNE =F _ 10 17 2 3p-t>° ld N L_ DENSE LANDSCAPE D '� w F U V44LK Sa - 0 1.D 0 to pp J LOAnINc � T w to 3�1 ' Po IILv10N REDT �9 (5418 S�.Ff.) g LU < v�.rypNCDUI ETALLB _ -v FO— 'w Ls >„ K s IMPERVIOUS SURFACE �iJ - •� `0 ov EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 5,341 SQ.FT. ��Z 5;3i NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA 43,693 SQ.FT. CO 9 0 ax 9 N N DR. - REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT 49,034$Q.FT. Q LLI � b� LS.F B31(+3 a�J�}I/,Na a 4`' v 'L3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 5 2q� 19'- tl II ICI. 0'. 2v 17 p. Our pmposetl pm)atrsenv ronmeMally advanced wM1h upb 86%water C O(ULCE —SONfER'p .. J L8 DRNE �580F) a DRNE recycling,LEDSIeand lauding lght,naewellaasolerrodpenele Q y NRLK (exceadmg wde requremema) m ExlsnNc �, O R-_ NOTAPART $: G L ENTER - 20 NRWCA�IT BWOH All equipment s cencxled wMnthe building to eliminate sound m B' S U o M 4`A f ESCME LS o Alpotluda(Soap.max,�c)are MDtleg etlableaM enwronme ally •. _ Mandly. a 1 1 FOUNTMN Q Ls o-N DR IANDscAPE m� •00 -_.__.____ __. _--.. SITE SUMMARY DR rvE- Pos I CAPE 4, Qs o m (9744,9780ARROW ROUTE) DR •PoS° jz' BUILDINGS(COMBINED FOOTPRINT) 5,2325G.FT. DRNE - >-sa9oRTHEMED M LANDSCAPING(38%)10%MIN 22343 SQ.FT LANDSCAPE CURS FMTRu�cE CONCRETE 31:725 SQ.FT. LANDSCAPE SITE TOTAL(1.36ACRE5) 59,300 SQ.FT. xOj g DEDICATION(ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING TTTT�II1 EXCLUDED FROM TOTALS ABOVE) 2,650 SQI f,MSNEM LANDSCAPE 4 LANDSCAPDFIRE LANDSCAPE PARKING SUMMARY 'FHII�L DETECTOR CHECK\ LOCTIONSAUwVARr VACUUMS 32 STALLS • `.---- 4 '97µ- " SEE$NEETB 9780 " CUSTOMER-EMPLOYER 8STALLS " - OVERHEAD LITI LINES BB So - LOADING(14'X 24') 1STALL 40'COMMON .� 0, 10 DEDICATION DRNEAPPROACH - -• INDEX '0 SHT. DESCRIPTION 1 SITE PLAN + ARROW ROUTE BGP SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 2 CAR WASH FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATION WN z_Iyp 7 CAR WASH ELEVATIONS,DETAIL FLOOR GENERAL INFORMATION PLAN AND ELEVATIONS -00 Sux1"•20'-0" N 4 ARBOR FLOOR PUN AND ELEVATIONS My LON 21 B OCCUPANCY 5 ROOF PUNS AND SIGN ELEVATIONS O O O O M' E B CONSTRUCTION TYPE VS a BUILOINGCRDSS-SECTION m go ro Omm Exhibit G1 CONCEPTUALGRAOINGPLAN 4 S BUILDING:2-STORY Li CONCEPTy�.J�Lf CAW A N N N N N EIAIP PHOTOMERO�I UgIIiINGl a7� Bn.w 1NOUR SEPARATON WQMP PRELIMINARYW PC, 000Q1 IN UEU OF SPRINKLERS 200'PER BUILDING WITHIN 200'OF SITE ELWE (AREA SEPARA(ION) U.S.TOPO U.S.TOPO MAP O O N U OI SMN. wKw wawmn� ARBOR 1 _o r r � Advanced Engineering .' a * 22837 Yea NW,S jhe 1w.1Noad land lil Is.(A 91364 10, (818)222,PA2 f(818)222-1986 fax l J .00 RESIDENTIAL I � R SIDEI TIAL � LL LL U. ZONE. L de i9 LOW DUI d d d V- (2-4 DU1AC) K � FAMILY � z � z z z � SITE UTILIZATION v# EO c cn I cry - - - - -- - - , . PLAN l � � ; � .00 I I 1 ' ALL 1 VACANT LOTLO I UL r ' *. ; 9 OFFICE .L ,� ,. . PROFESSIONAL ..�i� � •_. ADDRESS w w f LL �� ZONE: P + SPECIAL ED 0 1 _ l OFFICE PARK SCHOOL 11 z l I ar # ' Ranoo Cucamon , CA 91730 � l J I PREPARED FOR PROPOSED GENERAL I LL qw w J COMMERCIAL ZONE:GC I { EXISTING ZONE.LM Alan Smith � < VACANT LOT 4-8 DUTAC REST E AL C9 I MEDIUM -14 DU/AC) i PROPOSE b ONE. MH (MEDIUM I RESIDENTIAL HIGH RESI NTURAL)14-24DUTAC ZONE; L EXISTING Z NE LM (LOVE-MIEDIUM! I v ArrT LET E? IS I N G ESIDENTU At-) 4-8 DUTAC I LOW ( -4 DLVAC} J GENERAL 1 fERCi L U- i O � 1 04 0 I z I a R{ POSED _ I i AR DETAIL PROPOSED � uj a ir to AREA CAR WASH ED z I W I J Is . . Apnew F 1 ■ r M ST. - - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ` ONE: CI GENERAL C I I ERCI L - 1 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZC E: C EMT0 E IDE ZONE: I L 41 EXIT S �D � GENERAL C }II�'fI ERCI L SgURW LOW -4 D 1AD � COS+MERCIA.L IOFFIC i EXNST. BLOC a I COI�fu1EKCIAL/DFFICE SING E FI�IIL HOMES � 16 LF1 U EXIST. BLDG � - -- COMMERCIAL 1OFFICE a .; � •� FI �r LIB f f F V i i F_(I EXIST. BLDG l ll � o �� u�' xID' GOMAAEf IJ 1 FFICE C0�1+1\4RC L ft FFI E EAST BAG - GRJ1PwrC SCALE "Mr=FtC /OFFICE � SC�IE= r - 7�r EXIST. BLDG RESI ENTI L r \ COMMERCIAL/OFFICE E: L LOW 4 DU kC) s I CLE F MILY F DIMES L 100, I I GENERAL I DUSTRIA - 5zo : GI EAST.BLDG ' �7 GENERAL I DUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL IGFEICE I I wow RESUENTIAL I ZONE: H 1 IESI ENTIA HIGH MAC) NE. L f. - SUP APART SEC T BLD LOW DU/ p,RO n sp; Page357 REVISIONS BY Iwo I40'-o" Idw rtn L n 4 I I 4 A URRRR IN UEU OF SPRINKLER , A SERR ATION) Id-o" ID o' 116=o 'W'd 14%d 150'0 FM FLOOR PLM w-tv sz_rz------rt--sz ------ ��--s� --- --- C] I � o I & - j I UMORS I b-d I.41d 14'ro" B+o NJ-d (`� �IDtE ux.�ara We a our rdwe�wa, aEC01O FLOOR" ,I/"MM q� td®Q+Ma6 u"c rc o —_ \ t a a 4 a s r Tr r r e f Pgq 8wb,re�-,�-0• a,o■e ,\ / urncE'l j/a,oNE y' rtpR SOUTH ELEVATION eiTOM M nN¢a WEST ELEVATION �� U ewe.(/ �r�Iaae `3� I.1.rwae 1 2 � d 6Nrb AP 7R 1NS BY ROOF RIOR,ROlAr ROCUM03 CONCRETE TLE ROOF([) / CORMCE IRCN )CONCaETETRFR00f\ /4\ ETpLWNHA(1) .o O Sf11CW N STICCO/3) 71rAj: RN CkE70f IMTICE pECOMTNE OEOORRTNEDOORS =GONER ,3/COLUYN6 UlIt000118 STUCCO(J) OEC DOORTNE ST WMSERNORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION /1 O �/ YMM ROOF K4HPW TRA Mo— O TLNEFFW 45`•0' TOM DOM Oq —�C01�R \� Q � OL7ucco— �N MIM COI.OW �S COIOYI 6 gym ITONEVEMM 0 0 0 0 0 � OEOORA� FINaMOIIIDE O aR 3 sTUCCO SOUTH ELEVATION ,. DOORDECORAS WEST ELEVATION VFT� T DOORS e I °o r DETALCOM 'O ,LELOf1. • RoaFNaNTN7Nf 6 N° _,TLe,aoF Daeu+e 11{tTLTOR�z _ TOPR \ JL— J STUOOO Q S1o1EY�LSRIrVATIO L uomST@EV9R0, ODECmFRMNLRRDE CaIMFLOOR PLANNORTH ELEVATION N Page 359 3 fR ,ar. ARBOR loLol REVISIONS BY `.RECYCLE I� BIN N - ALUMAWOOD PLUMAWCGD ARBOR O. ARBOA IE _ O w - _ v i _ I , _ u B _ STONE O VENEER LATCH O VENEEfl ,� RABH r cc)BIN N THROW, ^� • 518"/ POAAPPROVED 18 GA.CLEANED.PRIME D - CRANE EOLT LEVER HANDLE AND PAINTED BO% RIBBEDSTEELGATES TRASNIRECYCLE PLAN SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION i••=T•.p^ 2 IoI-o° 2� N - N N ALUMAY=D ARBOR CURD FfY.E _ 1 _DECORATIVE O 1211COLUMNS Y- �Q 5 -- ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ---- WWFPCF _ ALUMAVVODD ARBOR ENTRANCE ELEVATION ARBOR. .•=Td" END ELEVATION ARBOR ]� v 41•�11 41-6 DEOORATIVE 12¢'COLUMNS }— CCRO FACE —PRECAST DECDRATNE.— -- VTDNE ENEER PAY O \ STATION I FPCE FArZ nM , 0 '1 3'-2°Ro 9° - N 1w _ Top cuRa t IN STONE DECOIIATIVE VENEER Scale 2 IDI•o° 2 BOLLARD Oj Dream 14b" - ^B Page 360 BN�I I .. 4 ARBORPLAN, 'A'.Vr PAY STATION PLAN 421-1Lo" FRONTELEVATION U2^•I'o SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION lie" I-d oI sB�u REVISIONS BY Sco""B" TILE EiE Tu ROOF TILE OOF�-- — -- 4q SL IS 18GA GI.RI CAW OVER x•vLymLYwD a BL � wocE � I BEE FLAT ROOF 4 d a L di � � I gL S. I FIAT ROOF i Ba SL F TROOF BE BE � I CON"Im TILL W FAW TB[NOOF. 1LENOOf ROOF PLAN cARwnsN WOW CONCRETE TILE ROOF J g RIDGE ROSE BL. F � L uz ROOF PLAN DETAIL AREA Ae i 7 ALIJ W 'S • 4 ip o z4 _ =S _ ..ESS d -0 1` STONIE1 J—EER TONE . (D un 2b _._6TIOMIM ZIv — (pU%B%It. � Brewn 5wY FACE&nth e MA,SIDE;IYP) PL�VAT�N B., PERIMETER BLOCK WAL 5 (ser SITE PwN FOR LOCATION) MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION are^=r o END ELEVATION aiE,.=ro" VACUUM DELIVERY ARCH SCA--. Of " ARBOR REVISIONS BY Q 5 tTi —. sTltio oKQ FOAM raccEiT[q.cR) 4+&aatT m TAiLsc ZF"a _ � \ v _ m Zr Tb AFq H . - � RECE55ED A sNtca OYER I "WPLawm 4', aka+ 'D 3z6 wI'a�1Y v ARGTt _ '� AAn✓E¢tfiolY WINOgV Al N "6P ARW AWMAWc a 2'o" R•, RzRMu1G i0 9 To - N - AA m = tD - d c ARCH 0 I. -0 R6ces,ED $ WINDOW eI - N � p lo'd ' COxee IA m LowMHI -TIMNEI EpUIP. m SECTION qa">4o n • ,PLIr rAce E4,cr.K EWLCIE FIREDETECTORCHECK I DSCAPE DUMTORCHECK FACE �K �E •c I,,,)MATCH .. ID K) I PERIMETER \VAU-5 s�.I. I s�.w. WIDTH VARIES TO ACCOMMOOA7E [B(ECTOP, l I� p a.c CHECK VALVES R-VIDEO (®�-8 SHOVI.I) _. _ L—I__ 4 a �, 62 men FIRE AND LANDSCAPE DETECTOR CHECKS "--P-o" DETECTOR CHECK SCREEN WALL FRONT =11-0' 3 DETECTOR CHECK SCREEN WALL oe a 6 s I. vaw wwun. ARBOR OWNERIDEMOPER: IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12223 NIGHWID AVE,STE 106 201 _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARROW ROUTE MOOD CUGUfONGV,CA 917J9 (909)2J4-960J AN. y ENGINEER: 400S RIMEERS INC. CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN BrN sr CORONA 5.RCA 92 ATE.SIE.101 CORONA CA 92879 (951)279-904I PH. a a a (951)279-2830 I" INFILTRAT/ON BASIN DETAIL: S OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, 6TH STN ASSESSORS PARCEL Na: N.T.S. TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. o > 0208-291-03-0000 "' s TOTAL ACREAGE SAKE ENGINEERS,INC. AUGUST 2020 arN sr x TOTAL ACREAGE I.6 AC. DSTRUBEDAREA 1.3 AC. ( 1415K'1 IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.W90 AG(39,084 SF) - PERVIOUS AREA 0.46 AC.(20,249 S.F.) SAN BERNARDIND{' TOPOGRAPHY. • _pl�l 5z --. 1„56l ILANDMARK wl 14586 CHOKE CHERRY DRIVE S TURVEMG '41'2r E/28.00' 1' S B9.41"19'E 64.00'.'I IS.5 P MIDMOI E,CA 92392 LS (760)955-4141 M. 1--8S 1.50 Tc ZONING AND LAND USE.• sr.30 FL -� 5z.J5 166 PROP.EXIST. R/W R/W fog• R/W EX151.ZONING LOW-NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL i So PROP.ZONING GENERAL INDUSTRIAL L6 m EXIST.LAND USE VA ANT MENTAL 9 1 5. 14 JB' J6' 14' PROP.LAND USE MIXED USE NORTHSOUT,-IM 7 152.10 TC 05'n 4' V0 A IAEAST NU 52.20 IC ..WEST \BENCHMARK:RESET 2'BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB STAMPED ` PROP 5 EXIST.AC (E)C&C XTY RANCHO CWAMONG4 8Mf 10041A 2009"AT 6" B" �J FS ARROW ROUTE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL SUO AND IL'1 14 0 TC .. ARCHIBM.D AYE.f.0'+/-WESTEMY FROM THE END CF d I TYP.STREET SECTION: OF CURB REIURN ON FOOTHILL BLVO. (I1531 a 1.20 -� I F SIa 11+52.6714+86.06 N..S. ELEY.=IZO7lW 2.6 6 52. i .. I1 4 sz - �� EARTHEN a H CONSTRUCTION NOTES: BAS/S OF BEARING: MODIFIEDFC&G DETAIL:, 5z.75 FS Ls HaMM sz. ww ww NTS' 51.0 THE CENTERLINE OF ARCH/BALD AVENUE N N 1 1 1 I LS O.B3 FL 13 II1 BEING NORTH 00T5:T01YEST AS SHOWN ON ION N Cqy pCC Iy�/,I pFgA,p y AA- Ma 13J/80-81. I 1 9 I N__ 3 (PER SOIL ENG.RECOAIMENDAiION L JJ B 1 Si 5� 18'.O.C.EW OVER CO.NPACRD N4/hE FLOOD ZONE. 5 sz.6060 F5. -52'2f TC 15"I 1'0D 1.1A0 F 3 ry Io-S4WCUT&REMOVE EXIST.CURB&GUTTER FLOOD ZONE=X I 52. p 52.f0 T(�' 1.50 i 1 u I `'I"\ H ry o J S4WCUT&REAIOIE EXIST DRIVEWAY APROICN COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C-863W 1 1.60 FL 30.9 T T�� m 51.0 TC 51.30 T -5 Fs 5f.30 FS 0.46 FS 50.5 FL g = o-cONsT 6-CURB PER Cln OF RANCHO cucAmI STD.104,TYPE AI-6 02/18/2015 � �, �l0 1.50 FS i ----_--_ ----__ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Q I1-, L S FF 5,.60 LS I8T TC.. 4. NV/9 I" 50-�n�E A2-6 ae&cuTrzR PER cm of RANCHO cuG4eaNCa Q 51.7.j TC g 4 {bj PE 51.f0 - ,y` ( Go-CONS..4'P.C.C.SIDEWALK OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST OUMlER OF THE 7 CONST.RIBBON GUTTER W+J' 5 NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSfBP I SOUTH RANGE 7 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO 5 MERIDIAN V151 5 LS &CONST.RIBBON GUTTER W-4' EARTHWORK: 1U I ' f 51. FG Sat 7C W r 1 9&CONST.r2•WOE NOW STRIP PILL 600t C.Y. 51.50 ITC 5 TC I LS f RMER f0 CONST.COVERED IRASH ENCLOSURE PER CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMaW SID. CU7 600t C.Y. Q I '. _ WI 50 1 52.00 I 4 11 CON51.oRR211'4Y APPROACH PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYPVGI 5/0.101,I1Pf C W=25' N07F I 51.4 l 4 i,,x f2 INSTALL TRUNCATED DOMES 51190 9 N 3"PVC PIPE ENUH OUA7IIIES SHOWN HERE ARE FOR RAW I 0140 I .90 FL 6 1J CONST H4NDIC4P/VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIAIL MU77NG PUN CHECK FEES ONLY.GRADING 51 N01 TC I 14 APPLY 4'WIDE BLUE STRIPING 5'WIDE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PERFORM 5.0 FS 5 JO FL 4.00 BASAL/BOTT04 4 TER OWN CALCULAT06 FOR EARTH VOLUME �. IS RELOCATE EXIST.WATER METER WITH THE SOILS ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION .. S/ 16 CONST.2'TOAIE571C WATER SERVICE PER CUG411ONCA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ELECTRIC T SO.CAL.EDISON CO. 1-800-655-4555 W POINT A� � --- - _ 17 INSTALL 6'DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK PER CUCAMONOA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT GAS CUCAMONGA MOCAL CAS CO. 1-900-427-2591 J2,9B• 1j IB sCONST'6-SEWER LATERAL PER CUWONG4 VALLEY WATER TISTRICT SIT.201 WATER CUGWONCA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT_1-909-987-259f ,pESTR,� 6 SEWER TIME WANG4 VALLEY WATER DISTRICT-1-889-987-259r Q AREA J 1 J AREA J� f9 CONST.6"CLEW OUT PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT STD.207 TELEPHONE -TIME WARNER 1-898-892-2153 w '0 CWlE CH4RIER COMMUNICATIONS 1-BB6-499-8080 ___�___�___�___�___�___�___�__..___�___�___�___ �___B^IVL__�__ __ten-�___�__�___.�__g7yL___� _�___�___�___�__ ___� o-CONST.CURBSIDE GRAIN OUiIFf PER CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA 57D.107-$ SCHOOL DISTRICF-CUCWONG4 UNIFIED SCHOOL TISRBCi_i-909-987-8942 m --± Aq�ryyA. --T -� _ -� _�.18+--y v-__�__�yy�. ��o�__n'18 L¢ 21 COMFIT FIRE DEP.WiMEM CONNEC710N PROP. EXIST. � �I RAW R/W IN, R/W -'-----'---- i 8'SS--�---- --R'--s- ---s--83'S-- CONST.B'CURB&CLARET PER-OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ¢ ' FIRE&LS.DETECTOR CHECK SD.IN,TYPE A2-B ION 5f 50' R/W 245' ��W PER ARCH PLAN SHT.6 9.5' I 'r+e4. Z�J-CONSE 6'HIGH BLOCK WALL PER ARCH.PUN i o-7' 47' J7' 13' I EX6T GRATE GR4DE Q z 2,T 1.T EXIST.ORATE (E)AC 1 CONSi.PARKWAY DRAW PER CRY OF RANCHO CUGUIONGA SM.IO]A WIDTH=J N 12' N _ T.6 D14 RIP RAP 1 ��_ __m I r(O 1T x ,My/N MIN - S. C&G PROP.DI _ .. _ ___ p 6 4 (E)C&G EXlS7.AC (E)C&C SUN' p 1 5 (b ARROW ROUTE (E)C&G sEC77ON C-C REVISIONS I DATE 1 B R i'=f0' TYP.STREETSECTION: SECR0N A-A W rsro' STa 12.20.01-,2+52.67 N.T.S. N I*to' 0 JW so /ro 9744 ARROW ROUTE -_ LEGEND. "'''° co.= CLEAN our --------- FLOW LINE = PROPERTY LINE 209' CONCEPTUAL GRADING& - S.F.: SQUARE FEET - a- PROPER TY g• I DRAINAGE PLAN GB.- GRADE BREAK M. WATER LINE EXIST.GRATE -� CENTER LINE H.P.= HIGH POINT PROP< PROPOSED ` g CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----W------ DZ77NG WATER LINE IS = FINISHED SURFACE APW ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 4 1 1 I N 4MF � ____ EX6TNG SINITARY SEWER LINE 50= STORM TRAIN gPO„(L' PARCEL COLLMPOSED GRANITE (E)AC 8 2% 5250 fF 52.20 FF 20X2D� _ a�iPN 6 SCALE , -J0 SAKE J.N. JIM V ft = FLOW LIVE s= SEWER ____ ------ ------------ - ------- PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: W NX PROPOSED SLOPE TO = TOP OF CURB NIS= NOT TO SCALE c°5w30 MIE 8-24-2020 AC SHEET IXISTNG CONTOUR W.I. WROUGHT IRON S/W= SDEWAlX 4 NV BRAWN: IMT • SUFlf)MG• LMW lYIIICNERT C.L.= C/WN LANK RJ' RIGHT OF WAY `"r4 ryVM1 I[G S RAMOW AK,AE 2R2 - -EQJ- PROPOSED CONTOUR P.LPx PROTECT IN PUCE IYc= P R7 AND CEMENT CONCRETE (E)C&G SECTION B-B F4W°� DESIGNED:SA X w" REi.WALL iIV TOP OF WALL EXISb EX/971NG (A5lJ 279-4047 FAX(W)179-1&W OF 2 SHE Lu=LAND USE H.r'=1°' SAMAKBARPOUR P.E. RCE 053038 'CHECKED.s+ NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE IF= TOP ER NE AC=ASPHALT CONCRETE V I'=10' �$]j`o`��\ CI RPNCHO CUCA\JN3150 DAW..NO.. p (ROW_) IXISTNG ELEVATION C[ = CENTERLINE COUP= CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT PUN CK REF.' udrt'�Q/L\4La LC DALE:8-2A-2010 G-) ARBOR aU .� PLANTING LEGEND w u� — _ i SM'WOL BOTANICAL NAME cg6ML5V NAME SIZE F—AC&Ary G • CITY STD.STREET TEE 156LL4 NA 5 ~ $m$ • l` — FIR RUCTION PER URBAN FORESTRY OEM. D.C.30' =mm c T"7 a _ iANIACMfRTA MHNE BOA aGN .S OII 12 W R0ow I -- T CaNew CMWPoM CAREW THE:MLTPTPoM WBOo V 3 ADS IB Qp g cnu WPL 5 pMrvMMI � N F a O` MELYPXAOVNXDIINU G.EFVT THE;MLTRTWM M'n .SP) 12 INLLTRTIuW J AIM. EBSTIH TEi0HN3DVED AA YLmm ALmm TEE OF HEAVEN 0 CNOCEMM DEO m INCENSE CEO. E 10 CANWENSS CARVAY INANO PINE TREE ENGINE PROfO5E06'IVE • ' ELM BLUE WNAY JIHIRR IS GW SIM) U B�E�E rll 'BaE,HDW' L a 'PDDOCFMSNW pRINAYYfW P000PARE16 ISll ,SIN) r CUTH SPOT RSA US 5 A I(L) Q U %=R'Snal ROBMVOTFYl6PAHER 5GAL .3H) W 0 j,� U • LIGLGIPoN J.'1EAIMAI' GLOSSY PPoVET 5GI1 .S(L) [_' Z f ��F •.MTIG/C4F09AG [HfMWA IS. .5 GO ` Q Qo RCGAA.'ILEBWX Mr. MNEN:EBIsm 2GW .31LI N J •SLLVIAGH WN ORI'FORRED' FORMA DSWE I- .S ICI H D PROPOSEDh' T. fCORATIVE GHMA[NWN RENDER STARELOMER SGN 1111 WALL ®MNIDLEIIS(MICA BAIEPoXA' DWA%IIOIAN HAXTMQM SGN .SIMI • INNC—FIEPOMER FIRER NEA HEAVENLY 56A .S IN) BAMNp - --'- y •DIETES IPoDIgDES AFRICAN IRIS 56A. .5 ON) ''B^� VINESIGRUUDONER. c'n^ ®CAN[SSA NACNENNA GEEN CARPET NATN RUN I .SIMI in m 'GREEN I—T' u/ai/ 2/� TRASH ENCLOSME 1 W V/ U SCREENWrvnlES- ELPNWNIA MARITMIG RENCIL MICA BISX 16AD. }(L) O Q ' AT IO'O.C. 6'QC. tea/ Q a. (D ®WIN CMFORNIANATWLGAAS4NDMANDY',AGHMTEC NDAC6EED.51) ^ 2 3 U SEED.MSSEED. W / f ■ MACFADYENA MGM CATI' UT'S CREW VIH IGNB .3W Q U 0'D.C. J S6'NCI TREE VITAS V.C4BEAEi WIG" CIHFOEi SNNUXOX GRAPE IT Bt .S On m U NONINING GROOKOVER _ •.R.. /` 2'DEPTH DECCRVORD GGMITE PAM SPPoHS W S.PONN K Y DEPTH SOREST ROO'MUN J m III: WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET: 0 � PTRO.IECT'.ARBOR ElPRE55 CAR WASH U os=Es @ MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWAI: PETER FEAnRE L PER owrvR BSL'.. EM 55.70 PmcIe GNWDWwa a 'rPROPOsED PROPOSED Co..FBI(Gals)0.62 SIGNAG n" r MDOR/TREIIIF ETAdINsanenl O.SS PER ^^ ) TLA 20.822 n I rvEs :. I_. Special Land Area 0.00 .3lsu adlusLmeM) 11111 391.227 Gallons per year vBNN EN ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU): Z - NydroZOD¢W1 LOW WATER Hydro20n¢N2 MED WAIEfl UEGA 55.1 w --- —— -------- ColWeraion ktror 082D COmerslon filO6Tr 082D Crop Coefficient 0.30 Crop CoeRcienl 0.40 , _ H/dromreArea 17,927 Mpromm Area 2.895 ZL M9a5on Efficiency 0.81 WI9alion ERlciency O.81 Special Land Area 0.00 Special Land Area 0.00 OFFSIM IRRIGATION SUMMARY INFO, TREE SIMMARY TABLE: ETWU• 226,923 ETWU. 48A99 0 NOTE:ALL AREAS TO BE GRIP IRRIGATED SLOG.NG STALLS=39 TIMES%Q'O=13 TOTAL FORALL HYDROZONES: SLOG.LINEAR FOOT DIMENSIONS=545 LF TREES REQ'D=11 L TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA: 1.5T4 S.F TNT.PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS=545 LF iFEES REO'0=IS I�tlromTlB W1 228,823 Hydromne p2 48,839 Y m IRRIGATION CONCEPT STATEMENT: NOTE AF m PRECIPITATION RATE: .6 IN/HR z U FLOW PATE(GALMR) .6 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED= A8 E7WU TOTAL- 279�N2 �� 9/2010 CG CGG TREES PROVIDED= 32 AT 218 rI L IRRIGATION PLANS SH4LL COMELY WITH THE CITY'S ORDINANCE FOR WATER I. NL RNA III ROECEIVE 3'DEMX,MIROENTSMEN D,FTH SNDL 9 I E UQIb AT 15 GAL. EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING. II. IN AHts NIX GRQNO[OVM FLWRDfEM FlAIS MUXDEPTX SXNLEDXE AIO DIE HAT 9/IB/ZOaOgJJ$2p G 2. ALL RANTERS AREAS GHALL UTILIZE A DRIP WATERING SYSTEM FOR LOW AWES(Hlfl. VOLUME APPLICATON OF WATER. 2. INSTALL UENi BOOT BAPNER TONL THESWITHIN B'CE HASCARE. E 3. ALL VALVES SHALL HAVE PRESSURE REGULATION AND FLOW SENSING DEVISES 3. DIDONL GPoNNO COVER BENEATH SXNNS NOISES. o ON SIT IRRI GATE eupGCex[Oy£0.{.E: FOR FLOWHIONITORED IEtIGATION WILL BE USED. 4. CONTROLLERS SHALL BE•SMART'CONTROLLERS UTILIZING THE LATEST L S 1 TOTAL SITE AREA: 62.384 S.F PRIVAT AMDSCA.E NOTE c NOTE:ALL AREAS TO BE GRIP IRRIGATED Sir WSC TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER CONTROL AND MONITORING.ALL CONTROLLERS SHALL F _ __e_S AREA: 20.822 S.F. ALSO HAVE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MANAGERS OR SIMILAR DEVICES FOR WEATHER PERCENT LANDSCAPE: 33% ALL TIC I R MEME WITHIN.11 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY,INCLUDING STREET TREES.SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE c� TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA: 1N,248 SIX BASED ADJUSTMENTS. .. PRECIPITATION RATE: .43 IN/XR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BANS.IF TNERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND PrBNATE FLANS,THE STREET N FLOW RATE(GAUHR) .6 IMPROVEMENT PLANS WILL GOVERN. �(207'p 10360_4 20' o a P �CTiLE I'=i0' h RMSION6 BY I i PLAN NOTES I '2d-0 Oj liN5l16NlIN6 PAr1FlW REPRE`81f51LL9MNATION LEVIlm MUBW PRdA 1 2.0 '1.4 '18 VBDRATORY DATA TAKEN NAI OgIIFOLLED Odtl21110N5MLI2IN6D.ARBtt INW5IRY STNIDPfD7 LPNP RATN651N ALLpOHY.E WIIN ILLLMINATINb �. B1611ff$tIN650OI APRROVFD F£1NW TONALAAIILEd'ANY +1.8 ' +1.7 IMR.FPL1URHt511MINN4E WAY VARY DE TO VARIATIMA110N IN IN ELE4IRIOAL VOLTAGE,TOl8tA4CE IN-ADD dlNER VARIAEIE FIND OIXDITION6 '2,0 +1.6 '2.3 3.3 I i a 's LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE -0a5D ( TYTE H4LFPLILHU LANP/ TL 'i6 '1.2 '1.5 WOpg, LLTENB VX VOLTAGE I I I • I ED OW Uilpsgpl-P.ED-IV-6eLED-3EOWA- � I I I I bv-2D6-A°D-#ar,-vt.ED f1.9 `3. `1.6 `7.2 1. 4.0 ®US.A NI %.k LED im WSPPI-R®-III-64LID-3`vGMA- ]OBV. �2.9 11 '20 +1.5 20 i I O US ARGIOEOMWL lED 'IOW/ I I SO roSAvl-P,ID-v5W-0+LE0.39OWA. X�Bv. 20 O 616 LED ISN �_ 2.9 i 1 5 '1 WP%2-5O.4OK-DIMEL# 20DV. �'r '1.2 '1.11 '6.8 O DEG04 %4aMN-vM lID 36W I�UI •iD+T-0' 20BV. m .SF . +d ' �R O US.ARONIIEOIVRAL 4Q ] 1.3 1. 5.1 � � Yp6gpIfLED-IIf4lEDd50MA- LED 'Iqy/ I NW-20bIDD-#ifSVLEO 200V. 'S 7 +Y.2 '3.6 '12.2 3.1 '1.9'3 7. 6.0 3.8 +10.1 `1.8 r7,� 2. '3.8 2.1 2.3 2.A 2.7 2.7 '2.5 3.3 2.5 3.2 '2.5 '2.4 2.4 +2.2 '24 1.7 '20 `2.8 '2.6 2.�, '9.6 I I I g6I '2.8 '3.0 '3.3 3,1 `2.9 2.6 '2.5 '2.2 '2.0 '1.9 '1.8 1.8 +1.9 +2.1 '2.4 '2.8 3.4 '3.2 '2.Q 3.2 +2D'a i I I +3.3 '3.9 '3.9 '3.3 '3.2 '3.2 '2.8 `2.1 +1.9 '1.7 '1.4 1.8 +2.1 +2.6 '2.8 3.7 3.5 '3.5 (n I (n dd 2 4.9 '3.1 _ Z ICI sc x ♦ CL�oz sA .2o'c• 3 a '4.1 '5.0�3 5 '4 0 2.3 .4 '1 + '-D' SAIL LBIIFR �6 6.9 4.8 '3.2 w a0 '3.8 +5.0 +4.9 '4 .6 2.7 .8 '1 .7 +3.3 3.5 +3.5 3. '5.4 m J v 2 Q 4 3 1 � O '3.1 4., 4.7 '4] 4 0 3.3 E +Idb' m 2.6 2.9 3.8 4.1 '3 .5 +2. 17 1.3 1.9 '1.9 +3.8 'QS 8.2 '31 +3.2 +3. I UP. '2.4 '3.1w' 8 +.8 2.2 1.8 1. 1. +Id4'SE 2.8 +2.8 +2.8 w2 a. a 26 '28 +2.6 'S. I ��rr +1.8 +2.4 +2. +2.0 +1.6 '1A '1.5 '1.7 +3.3 +9..8 8.0 2,2 +23 +2.6 +2.6 +2.5 '2. 2.1 '1.6 '2.0 '2. +1.1 +1 RETENII ARROW ROUTE �s o.,E wnazozo N ��U U U sc.� nsxoleo On1NH L6 A ERRfC GROUP INC , North Page ��W S-E: E I A P PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN ARBOR '\� PRROW ROUTE '•�' 8 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SITE& DRAINAGE PLAN n SECTION AA" BTM sT IYP. TUTS _ � a - 9 b Y � � t a w (1156) --- 4TH sT a --- x S4N BERNgRpINO FI4Y INFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL: o ---- -------�-- --- ---- ----- -- N.T.S. x N3 BSL LS ; SD-12 LS / s 1 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. j 1y BMP REPONSIBLE PARTY INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES REQUIRED MINIMUM FREDUENCY IS OF ACTIVITIES N7I AC INFILTRATION BASIN ALAI SMITH INSPECT BASIN FOR EROSION,AND SEDIMENT QUARTERLY AND DEWS PREFERABLY N15 END OF NEE WET ACCUMULATION SCHEDULE AT THE % - SUMMER MAINTENANCE Ni ALAN SMITH FOLLOW MIIKARON MARTERA ATTACHED AT END OF NEW OWNERSHIP m WOAFP REPORT. N2 ALAI SMITH PESTICIDES AND HER6YCwES SHVL BE APPLIED IN NEW OWNERSHIP ACLwRO4A'CE M1M THE GV1fORNtA DEPARTMFL!!OF SPITE wE6 Ri.DUMEY T.MIST BE PERFORMm BY A STALE CERDFlm MPIIDAinR. 1 . NJ ALAN SMITH UMRm roTo,MOYANG OF UY.NS.PRUIuxC OFTYtxEiA{wxEEDED TO . A. NEE iDE CON.B - SH41 BE PROWOEO INTO PERPETUITY.SEE AEACHm OUNNm IN THE ATTACNm SC-TJ (1153 c�anRnw sroreuwnrz —iwuo . N4 ALAN SMITH 1.INSPECT BASIN roR ERGS AO.AND SEDIMENT AND EVERY 4 MONTHS DEBRIS ACCUMUTADON PREf£TUBLY AT 1HE ENO Cl Tiki 54 55 LS NJ SD-12 THE WET SEASON TO SCHEDULE SUMMER NNNEAWICE N6 ALAI SMITH TROAECT ro COMPLY WITH CRY OF RANCHO JAN.&AUG. I �,T NNI 2CUCANONKA WATER DUAL TY ORDINANCE' ^ N6 Nil AIAN SM17H IT$fWL BE THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO EVERY 3 MONTHS PROVIDE PROPER UTTER WHIROL PER LASH GNP SC-60.LITER CONTROLS SNALL BE PROVIDED DOM REGULARLY SCHEDULED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE.OR AS NEEDED TO PREVENT -A Nil ^ N75 -... 115`L� V, TRANSPORTATION OF TRASH&DEBRIS FROM THE FD—ASIZE. Al ` m N15 ALAN SMITH DEBRIS AND TRASH SO NOW DRAW TO MONTHLY LS _ ° LS S2 ALAN SMITH THE siaRui ATZ<A swum—A—OR A— MONTHLY THE sroRux AaA ro MMIWZE C'IXLECIwN OF$IDRAMAIFR WRINN THE i, - .. SmCNBWi COMAWMEM IAFA A MNYIFACNRm 4 SIOWGE SHED WY BE ARID FOR SYNL COMNNERS N15 �, SS ALAN SMITH A Pft MNIOSURE WILL E TD WRECTROOF OR MONTHLY Nil FRECIPRAliON,SEE SD-J2 MORE INFORMATION IN 5 APPENDIX B L$ • -... I S4 ALAI SMITH OWNER SHAL BE RED Rm TO ADUERE TO THE MONTHLY CALIFORNIA NT LS LWOK APE ORDINANCE"MAPS WILL INCI.UDEOM WATER ETHE �'. WPIFMEWARON OF SNARi IRRIG4110N CONTROLLERS TO MAKBFRE WATER CONSERJAiION.SE£BROCHURE _-.- M APPENDIX B:EWCAl10NAL N41ERW5 AC -- L _- 55 ALAI SMITH KNISH-GRADED AT A MINIMUM OF 1-2 INCHES WEEKLY MOW TOP OF CURB OR SDEWA1K MR INCREASED REENIION/INFNIR1110N OF STORMWAiER AND IRRIGATION WATER. AC A N APPLICATION: - - - i S6 ALAN SMITH 1.INSPmi 51WIA FDR ERo6AML MMADE ro EVERY 6 MONTHS LEGS D.' SS v ir�t wo TOFFR¢ .sFasoN O SO-11 ROOF RUNOFF CONTROLS SGFmU1£SLIMMER MWNTEtUNCE ANO fffORE MAw.R SD-12 LANDSCAPE AREA N4 FALL RImwFF ro BE saE THE swxE a READr roR SO-J2 TRASH ENCLOSURE �- S6 24RA55 MIC T AHD uOMiNG FREW/ENCY MAY NOi TC-30 VEGETATED SHALE __. L$ 1,86D SF 845/N B07TOW HAVE A URDE&TRACT a4 PIXLUTAM RE 4L. T 017 INFlLTRATION BASIN - - -- OWNER/DEVELOPER: SD-f2 ALAN SMITH �� ro WEEKLY FL ALAN SMITH _ ro 2.DESIGN ARRIGA11011 MiEAlS ro E14H LWDSCA^£ f2549 OVERLAND DRIVE Q...- -_--_ p ARu5 s+EOIFw WATER KTDA W— WJACHO CUGIMONG4,CA 81739 J. ME AA,EICN FFAIURTN6 OW REDUCERS-------------- EDUCERS OR SHUTOFF ALOES 1RANL1F0 6Y A PRESSURE DROP ro (MI)800-8900 PH. ITC-li M of awKEn ENG/NEER'. J4.0 SPRWRIER NFM6 QR IIxES.E M UT.=34.097,59 SD-J2 ALAN SMITH PROPOSED TRASH REV ENCLOSURE TO SOLID ROOF OR MONTHLY SAKE ENGINEERS.INC. LOA'fx=-l17597919 AWNING TO PREVENT O-12 MORE 1 DIRECT 400 5..01 92 79 SIE.202 PREGYPRAIiON.SEE SO-J2 MORE INFORFMTION IN CORONA CA 92879 MPEHODt B (951)279-404f PH. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: - 0208-291-03,0208-291-06 eA TOTAL ACREAGE' ARROW ROUTE i.J6 AC ORC2018-00535 WDID: TOTAL ACREAGE' WOMP BMP AS-BUILT CERT/FICAT TOTAL ACRE 6F I.J6 AC 1 HEREBY CEWIFY 7HAT THE NECESSARY WATER DUALITY MANAGEMENT SAKE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHEET N0. OISRARBED AFFA 1.36 AC PLAN STORM WATER STRUCTURAL TREATMENT(BEST MANAGEMENT d9__1E ENGINEERJ, INC PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT NEW IMPERWOUS ARFA 0.90 AC PRACTICE)DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AWOD HEAVY EQUIPMENT A Ww m. IX/ST.IMPERWOUS AEA_0.25 AC AND ARE FUNCTIONAL TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE WITHIN B451N AREA. �° INxwN ENaNFEAAG•5M EW•LAW MEOPACK PLAN SITE&DRAINAGE PLAN TOTAL BMER�'AREA_0.90 AC DATE BELOW 0 20 40 ° 4A0 S ANWUN4 AVE,STE.202 OR OF 1 SNFEIS a CNLTF"92679 Rag D PLAN SIGNATURE DATE 1 inch= 20 ft. (951J 279-041 FM'(951)011 2810 ALE NO. SCALE:AS SHOWN ON PLAN ARBOR / gip' 1 _ f � r �x I ■ R5 I � w� �J ■ e 1 1 I i• h IMP F tt �.1 ifs m ROQt Arr�wlHo�rte r�fr.av Ol1tE` - - �� N 3ncy. Sk i • �J -. , �,. �� ��I � 4.- � 4~ !" � �=1�11�/llil�TCIIIiIICI4111i•J Z711 t� iiiiiiiiiii id s 1f J a . � a�Cgs sax � I rs°"�.."' E 5 �— � (€ B 1 e �€d1l Il 4 3 � 3 �I r✓.J' � a ip' I o 3 F Ea s g o. �5 � a U h a : a= �� t w� 4" V G ! w.mrxs w. SS�iJ i`xP '..S F 33131`5 k` Page 368 U.S.TOPO MAP ARBOR f t O C:5 O N N Q � d a� a • r � � r- -� a C4-- cd Cfl �u Page 369 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 — ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The "L" shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located to the west of the project site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved a project to reactivate this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and zoning map amendments (DRC2015-00684), changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial GC District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District West I Service Station' General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 —"Beverly Hills House"(designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989 on APN:0208-291-02; Exhibit D Page370 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 —ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 2 2—Not in operation but approved for reactivation Staff Summary and Design Review Committee Responsibility: In addition to the entitlement requests for a Design Review, the subject application also includes requests for a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment in order to alter land-use policy to accommodate the proposed use. Zoning map amendments and general plan amendments are legislative actions that establish City policy and require City Council review. These high-level legislative actions are typically intended to achieve some type of substantial public benefit. Generally, staff is not able to identify any such substantial public benefit which justifies a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment for this project. Staffs overriding concern with the project is thus whether the carwash land use is appropriate for the proposed location. The development review process, though, places the DRC review of the onsite structures prior to Planning Commission review of the higher-level land use policy issues. The DRC is, therefore, being asked to review the design of a project for which staff is unable to support the related entitlements. Consequently, subsequent reports to the Planning Commission and City Council will provide a thorough analysis of the appropriateness of the zoning map amendment and the general plan amendment. Along with the above-outlined concerns related to the land-use changes, staff has also identified a number of project-related technical deficiencies. Development Code Section 17.90.030 provides the Planning Commission with the flexibility to permit deviations from these provisions through the development review process or through the approval of Variances. As such, the DRC is not expected to offer recommendations based on staff's concerns regarding the proposed zoning map amendment/general plan amendment or technical deficiencies. Rather, the DRC is being requested to review the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the full Planning Commission for consideration of each of the project entitlements and the outstanding technical issues. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a car wash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,865 square automated "express"car wash, a separate 1,428 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The first floor of the car wash building is comprised of an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 rollup service doors, office area, and restroom. The existing single-family residence noted above will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The car detailing center will be a separate service from the automated car wash. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be located in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 13 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)accessible parking stall. Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use)states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 45 parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the car Page 371 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 —ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 3 wash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The car wash and car detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of "alumawood" arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of- way. Staff Comments: Staff has identified the following design issues that the applicant should address prior to the project moving forward to the Planning Commission for full review of the project: 1. The west elevation (front) of the car wash building includes a stone veneer on the tower elements. The east elevation (rear) includes similar tower elements without the use of the stone veneer. It is recommended that the east building elevation be updated to include stone veneer on each of the tower elements along with a similar gable treatment as that used on the west elevation. The City has a policy requiring 360-degree architecture carrying architectural details to all elevations. 2. Update the supports of the vacuum shade canopies to include a stone veneer base to carry over the stone veneer used on the on-site buildings. 3. The overhead lattice arbors and the lattice cover over the trash enclosures are currently called out to be constructed of "alumawood," which is not appropriate for a commercial development. It is recommended that the "alumawood" be replaced with wood. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Design Issues — Visual enhancement of the rear side of the main car wash building, stone veneer bases on the vacuum canopies and the use of wood rather than "alumawood" for the overhead trellises. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Page 372 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 —ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 4 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the on-site buildings. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee consider the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the Planning Commission for review of the overall project and the related entitlements. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Michael Smith Page 373 RANCHOCITY OF 0 lick Pni 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams x Tony M. Guglielmo Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca x Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY- A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building Page 1 of 3 Page 374 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00381 — KEN KANG—A request for site plan and architectural review for the reconstruction and expansion of a service station and convenience store located in the Mixed-Use (MU) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, at 8166 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0207-112-20 and 23. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00936. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303—New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535—ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018- 00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved with the Committee recommending that stone veneer be added to the carwash building tower elements on the east elevation. The Committee was also accepting of the use of"alumawood"on the trellis structures rather than real wood and not requiring stone veneer to be added to the bases of the vacuum canopies. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. Page 2 of 3 Page 375 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA it DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. ADJOURNMENT 7:45pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, December 12, 2019 at least seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 Page 376 0 December 9, 2020 To: Tabe van der Zwaag,Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 From: Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst MIG, Inc 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92507 Subject: Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project Dear Mr.van der Zwaag: On Tuesday November 24, 2020, City staff met (via Zoom) with representatives of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (Project) located on two contiguous parcels at 9744 (Parcel 1) and 9760 (Parcel 2)Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City).This Memorandum provides a brief Project background, details the proceedings of the November 24, 2020 meeting, and documents the direction given by the City pertaining to preparation of the Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration(IS/MND)for the proposed Project. In attendance at this meeting were: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director;Alan Smith, Project Applicant; Paige Gosney,Applicant's Counsel;and Pam Steele, Bob Prasse, and Cameron Hile, MIG. The Project includes development of a new automated car wash building and a separate detail center building along with associated parking, landscaping, and car wash system appurtenances on Parcels 1 and 2. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial.The Draft IS/MND that was prepared for the Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25,2020 and ending August 12,2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route(Parcel 3)and 9872 Arrow Route(Parcel 4)from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. As shown in the table below, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), Parcel 2 (0.85 acres), Parcel 3(0.43 acres),and Parcel 4(0.79 acres)currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4- 8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore,this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. PLANNING I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 USA • 951 .787.9222 wat9tgo�b7n.com Parcel# 2 3 4 Existing Zoning Low Medium Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Pro osed Zoning Medium Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units The purpose of the November 24,2020 meeting with City staff was to discuss the redesignation of Parcels 3 and 4 and for the City to provide direction on how best to implement this change for the CEQA review. The City directed the applicant to generate a Final IS/MND to include the additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4 in the Project Description and in discussions of the Project Description throughout the document. The City further indicated that there is no need to include additional analysis regarding Parcels 3 and 4 in the Final IS/MND or to recirculate the revised document for another public review period. The basis for this approach is that there is no specific development proposal for Parcels 3 and 4 at this time, and any such future proposal will be subject to a full environmental review in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA guidelines. The Final IS/MND,dated December 9,2020 and included as an attachment to this memorandum,reflects the approach and direction provided by City staff as described above.The Final IS/MND shows revisions made to the Draft IS/MND with strikethrough for deleted text and underline for added text. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me at cameronh .migcom.com or call my cell phone at(626) 840-7719. Best Regards, Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst, MIG Inc. 2 Page 378 Attachment 1 Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 Page 379 Arbor Express Car Wash Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 44P�C�0 CUCAM��C9� O � y V 1 i�ir • 111 � or�d Class C�"� Prepared for.- Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite#106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 - a.y December 9, 2020 Page 380 -This document is designed for double-sided printing- Page 381 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 - Purpose of CEQA..................................................................................................................................1 1.2- Project Background and Purpose of the Final IS/MND..........................................................................2 2 Project Description......................................................................................................................................................4 2.1 - Project Title............................................................................................................................................4 2.2- Lead Agency Name and Address..........................................................................................................4 2.3- Contact Person and Phone Number......................................................................................................4 2.4- Project Location.....................................................................................................................................4 2.5- Project Sponsor's Name and Address...................................................................................................4 2.6- General Plan Land Use Designation......................................................................................................4 2.7- Zoning District........................................................................................................................................5 2.8- Project Description.................................................................................................................................5 2.9- Surrounding Land Uses.........................................................................................................................8 2.10- Environmental Setting............................................................................................................................9 2.11 - Required Approvals ...............................................................................................................................9 2.12- Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required................................................................................9 3 Determination ...........................................................................................................................................................21 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .........................................................................................21 3.2- Determination.......................................................................................................................................21 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts........................................................................................................................23 4.1 - Aesthetics............................................................................................................................................23 4.2- Agriculture and Forest Resources........................................................................................................26 4.3- Air Quality............................................................................................................................................28 4.4- Biological Resources...........................................................................................................................34 4.5- Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................................37 4.6- Geology and Soils................................................................................................................................43 4.7- Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................................46 4.8- Hazards and Hazardous Materials.......................................................................................................50 4.9- Hydrology and Water Quality...............................................................................................................54 4.10- Land Use and Planning........................................................................................................................58 4.11 - Mineral Resources...............................................................................................................................60 4.12- Noise....................................................................................................................................................61 4.13- Population and Housing.......................................................................................................................69 4.14- Public Services ....................................................................................................................................70 4.15- Recreation............................................................................................................................................72 4.16- Transportation and Traffic....................................................................................................................73 4.17- Tribal Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................83 4.18- Utilities and Service Systems...............................................................................................................86 4.19- Mandatory Findings of Significance.....................................................................................................90 5 Mitigation Summary..................................................................................................................................................93 6 References...............................................................................................................................................................99 6.1 - List of Preparers...................................................................................................................................99 6.2- Persons and Organizations Consulted.................................................................................................99 6.3- Bibliography.......................................................................................................................................100 Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) Page 382 Table of Contents Appendices Appendix A Air Quality/GHG Modeling Data Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix D Roadway Construction Noise Modeling Data Appendix E Noise Study Appendix F Vibration Calculations Appendix G Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix H Infiltration Testing Report List of Tables Table1 Residential Density Capacity.......................................................................................................................................5 Table2 Construction Schedule.................................................................................................................................................8 Table3 Surrounding Land Uses...............................................................................................................................................9 Table 4 RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions.....................................................................................................29 Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ..................................................................................................................29 Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (Ibs/day).................................................................................... 30 Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions (Ibs/day) ......................................................................................................31 Table 8 Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (Ibs/day) ................................................................................32 Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................47 Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................48 Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory....................................................................................................48 Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements....................................................................................................63 Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels......................................................................................................................63 Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Required ......................................................................................................64 Table 15 Operational Reference Noise Levels(dBA).............................................................................................................66 Table 16 Operational Noise Levels (dBA)...............................................................................................................................66 Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria........................................................................................................67 Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria...................................................................................................67 Table 19 Construction Vibration Impacts................................................................................................................................68 Table 20 Existing (2018) Conditions....................................................................................................................................... 75 Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary...........................................................................................................................76 Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions..................................................................77 Table 23 Opening Day(2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.............................................78 Table 24 Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Conditions.....................................................................................................79 Table 25 Horizon Year(2040)With Project Conditions..........................................................................................................79 List of Exhibits Exhibit1 Regional Context Map.............................................................................................................................................. 11 Exhibit2 Project Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................................................. 13 Exhibit3 Site Plan................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Exhibit4 Floor Plans............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Exhibit5 Elevations................................................................................................................................................................ 19 II Initial Study Page 383 1 Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga(Lead Agency)received an application for Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit from Southwest Design Group (Project Proponent)for the construction and operation of an automated car wash and detail center (Project) on a 1.36-acre site consisting of two parcels in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to one of the two parcels on which the car wash will be developed in order to bring the site into compliance with the Zoning Code. The application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels to the east of the Project site to provide higher housing density.The approval of the application of the car wash development as well as the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change constitutes a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations§§ 15000, et. seq.). This Initial Study was prepared to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental impacts that could result from the Project. This report was prepared to comply with CEQA Guidelines§ 15063,which sets forth the required contents of an Initial Study. These include: ■ A description of the Project, including the location of the Project(See Section 2); ■ Identification of the environmental setting (See Section 2.11); ■ Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries(See Section 4); ■ Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any(See Section 4); ■ Examination of whether the Project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls (See Section 4.10); and ■ The name(s)of the person(s)who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study(See Section 5). 1.1 - Purpose of CEQA CEQA§21000 of the California Public Resources Code provides as follows: The Legislature finds and declares as follows: a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern. b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man. c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment of the natural resources of the state. d) The capacity of the environment is limited, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the government of the state take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds being reached. e) Every citizen has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. f) The interrelationship of policies and practices in the management of natural resources and waste disposal requires systematic and concerted efforts by public and private interests to enhance environmental quality and to control environmental pollution. g) It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state government which regulate activities of private individuals, corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 1 Page 384 Introduction The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to: h) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state. i) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise. j) Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man's activities, insure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities and examples of the major periods of California history. k) Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment,consistent with the provision of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions. 1) Create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony to fulfill the social and economic requirements of present and future generations. m) Require governmental agencies at all levels to develop standards and procedures necessary to protect environmental quality. n) Require governmental agencies at all levels to consider qualitative factors as well as economic and technical factors and long-term benefits and costs, in addition to short-term benefits and costs and to consider alternatives to proposed actions affecting the environment. A concise statement of legislative policy,with respect to public agency consideration of Projects for some form of approval, is found in CEQA§21002, quoted below: The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve Projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such Projects, and that the procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects. The Legislature further finds and declares that in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such Project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual Projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof. 1.2- Project Background and Purpose of the Fina11S/MND The Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND)for the proposed Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25,2020 and ending August 12,2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) and 9872 Arrow Route (Parcel 4) from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential.The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units of that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Draft IS/MND included a Variance requesting a reduction in the required 20-foot setback from the adjacent residential land use and from the required 45-foot average landscape setback.The City has also requested the Project applicant remove the Variance from the Project and redesign the Site Plan so the setback from the proposed car wash building complies with the City's Municipal Code standard of a minimum of 20 feet when adjacent to a residential use and so the Project includes the required 45-foot average landscape setback from Arrow Route. As such, the Project Site Plan was updated to shift the proposed car wash building further to the west to accommodate for a 20-foot setback with the residential use to the east.The Site Plan was also updated to include a 45-foot landscape setback. Finally, the proposed concrete block wall around the Project was changed from 8-feet to 6-feet tall. These changes are reflected in Exhibits 3 through 5 below and resulted in a reduction in the size of the proposed car wash building and detail center building, an increase in the amount of proposed 2 Initial Study Page 385 Introduction landscaping, and a reduction in the proposed number of employee-customer parking stalls. These minor design changes will not result in any new or more severe environmental impacts than were previously analyzed in the Draft IS/MND that was circulated for public review and comment. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 3 Page 386 2 Project Description 2.1 - Project Title Arbor Express Car Wash 2.2- Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 909-477-2750 2.3- Contact Person and Phone Number Tabe Van der Zwaag,Associate Planner 909-477-4316 2.4- Project Location The Project site is located approximately 2.45 miles to the south of Interstate 210(1-210),approximately 3.02 miles to the west of Interstate 15(1-15),and approximately 2.18 miles to the north of Interstate 10(1-10)in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (See Exhibit 1, Regional Context Map). The Project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres located on the north side of Arrow Route,just east of Archibald Avenue(See Exhibit 2, Project Vicinity Map). Parcel 1 is located at 9744 Arrow Route (APN#208-291-06 and Parcel 2 is located at 9760 Arrow Route (APN#208-291-03). The Project Site will be developed with the proposed car wash development (See Section 2.8, below, for detailed Project description).As part of a gas station project that was recently approved by the City at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue(8477 Archibald Avenue),Parcel 1 has previously undergone a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. Parcel 2 will undergo an identical change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial as part of the Project. Two additional parcels(Parcel 3 and Parcel 4), located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route(APN#0208-291-02&0208-291-01)will undergo a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. However, no physical changes to Parcel 3 or Parcel 4 are proposed. • Latitude 340 5' 58.85" North, Longitude 1170 35' 32.14"West 2.5- Project Sponsor's Name and Address Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite#106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 2.6- General Plan Land Use Designation Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 4 Page 387 Project Description 2.7- Zoning District Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) 2.8- Project Description As previously described,the Project is comprised of two adjacent parcels along Arrow Route east of Archibald Avenue.Parcels 1 and 2 encompass approximately 1.36 acres, or 59,297 square feet. Parcel 1 is undeveloped while Parcel 2 contains an occupied single-family home.The single-family residence on Parcel 2 is currently used as a rental unit and will be demolished as part of the Project. As previously mentioned, Parcel 1 is currently zoned for General Commercial use as a result of a previously approved gas station Project. Parcel 2 is currently zoned for Low Medium Density Residential.As such,the Project includes a similar General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. This would bring the entire Project site into conformance for commercial uses in order to allow for the car wash use.The car wash development includes the construction of an automated express car wash building,a detail center building, shaded vacuum canopies/stalls, and associated parking and landscaping on Parcels 1 and 2 (See Exhibit 3, Site Plan). The 5,078-square foot car wash structure will have two floors (See Exhibit 4, Floor Plan). The first floor will include an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, enclosed area for mechanical equipment, restrooms, office space, cashier space, and storage space. The second floor will include an equipment room, an office and restrooms. The detail center building will be 1,296 square feet and consist of a single floor.The detail center will be used for auto detailing,which will be a separate service from the automated car wash and will contain restrooms and an office. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be included in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 8 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)accessible parking stall. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac)to General Commercial would result in the redesignation of land for residential uses to commercial uses. The redesignation of Parcel 2, which is 0.85 acres in area, would subsequently result in the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units. As previously mentioned, the Project application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4, which are 0.43 and 0.79 acres in area, respectively. As shown in Table 1, Residential Density Capacity, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre(du/ac), Parcel 2(0.85 acres), Parcel 3(0.43 acres),and Parcel 4(0.79 acres) currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial,and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4-8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore, this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. Table 1 Residential Densit Ca acit Parcel# 1 2 3 4 Existing Zoning Low Medium Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Proposed Zoning Medium Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 5 Page 388 Project Description Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common-approach driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This will be a shared driveway with the parcel to the west of the Project site on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue,which is currently being developed with a gas station. Upon entering the site,three lanes are provided for cars to line up at three automated cashier pay stations with barrier gate arms to pay for their wash and wait their turn. The automated barrier gate arms would allow one vehicle through the car wash tunnel at a time. Upon exiting the car wash tunnel, cars will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. To exit the site, cars would continue on the one-way lane and loop back out to the driveway onto Arrow Route.Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route.The Project will also include LED site and building lighting as well as solar roof panels. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches,decorative doors and columns,and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area(see Exhibit 5, Elevations).The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building.Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of"Alumawood"arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Express Car Wash System The express car wash will include a New Wave Industries, Inc. PurClean Spot Free Rinse System and PurWater Water Recovery System. The PurWater Reclaim System consists of two primary components: the underground reclaim tank(s) and the above ground PurWater unit. The below ground tanks are normally supplied by a local concrete vault vendor, with their capacity and lay-out per PurWater specifications.The primary purpose of the reclaim system is to provide quality water to the wash so that the water can be re-used within the wash and still provide a clean car.The re-use of the water allows the operator to minimize the amount of incoming fresh water to the wash and the amount that is discharged from the wash to the municipal sewer system.The reclaim system is not designed to meet a specific effluent quality of the discharge,although in many cases the water discharged from the system goes directly to sewer or a leach field. However, the system will allow for up to 86% water recycling, which will limit the amount of discharge into the municipal system at any given time. In addition, all cleaning products proposed to be used during operation of the Project would be biodegradable and environmentally friendly. As the primary purpose of the PurWater Reclaim System is to provide quality water for re-use within the wash, the system is designed to separate settleable solids (typically sand, grit) and free hydrocarbons, from fat oil and greases, from the water going to the wash. These solids and oils can affect the wash quality, and increase the maintenance on wash pumps, piping, and nozzles. The large settleable solids (60-70 micron and larger) are settled within the underground tanks prior to entering the above ground PurWaterunit.The PurWaterunit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be retreated or go out with the effluent. The free oils (60-70 micron and larger)float to the surface within the underground tanks and are trapped within the tanks. Accumulated settleable solids and free oils are periodically (normally every 3- 6 months) removed from the reclaim system by pumping out the underground tanks and replacing with fresh water. Some amount of water is continuously discharged from the reclaim system in order to satisfy the water balance for the wash.The volume of discharge is dependent on the amount of fresh water used by the wash, less any water that is lost to evaporation and carry-out. Depending upon local municipal requirements, the discharge can be sent directly to sewer or to a leach field or may require additional treatment before final discharge. As each municipality will have its own discharge requirements, it is important to understand what contaminants the PurWater Reclaim System can and cannot affect. The PurWater Reclaim system uses two processes to reduce contaminant loading. The first is physical separation using centrifugal force (the cyclones) and gravity settling (the reclaim tanks). Physical separation will directly affect the amount of 6 Initial Study Page 389 Project Description free oil&grease(FOG)and total suspended solids(TSS)left in the discharge water,and indirectly affect the BOD/COD level as it removes oil&grease.The second process is chemical,oxidation using ozone.Ozone will affect the bacterial count, BOD/ COD, total suspended solids (primarily bacterial), and some dissolved oils and chemicals. From field testing and experience, the PurWater Reclaim system has been shown to produce effluent qualities as follows:TSS, FOG, and BOD are typically the main concerns by municipalities receiving an effluent from a car wash. Given the type of processes used by the PurWater Reclaim system,there is no effect on total dissolved solids(TDS), pH, or temperature.There may also be little to no effect on certain chemicals dissolved in the water, emulsified or dissolved oils, and non-settleable solids. No heavy metals are used in the process so the PurWater system will not add or impact existing heavy metals. The above effluent qualities are going to be similar for other types of systems that incorporate physical separation (plate separators,screen/bag filters, media filters,etc.)and chemical oxidation. Biological processes,when operating properly, may produce lower TSS, FOG, and BOD levels than the above, but still will not affect dissolved minerals and some dissolved chemicals in the water.The above effluent quality estimates are based on normal contaminant loadings seen by car washes. The estimates are not a guarantee of performance. The estimated discharge quality from the PurWater Reclaim System may or may not be acceptable for direct discharge to sewer or a leach field.Local authorities and municipalities should be consulted to determine whether additional treatment is required to meet discharge permits.The second component of the reclaim system is the above ground treatment system,which further removes solids from the reclaim water so that it is acceptable for the high- pressure pumps and nozzles within the wash. The PurWater reclaim unit has a suction pump that brings water up from the reclaim tank to be treated.The pump speed is controlled by a Variable Frequency Drive(VFD)to either continuously recirculate water(low speed) or to provide water to the wash (high speed). Several pump speeds can be programmed into the VFD to meet various or multiple demands. The PurWater unit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The cyclones create nearly 1000 G's of centrifugal force to obtain this fine particle separation. The treated (cleaned)water is sent to the wash and /or back to the reclaim tank as part of its continual recirculation mode. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be re-treated or go out with the effluent. The above ground reclaim system also has the function of providing odor control for the reclaim water. Reclaim water is a great environment for growing bacteria which can create plugging and odor problems. Typically, anaerobic bacteria (bacteria that grow in the absence of oxygen) will grow beneath the settled solids in the reclaim water tank. This type of bacteria produces hydrogen sulfide which produces an odor similar to rotten eggs. To control this bacterial growth, the PurWater reclaim system continuously recirculates water through the tanks to keep the water moving so that it does not go septic. The PurWater system also incorporates one of three odor control devices to further keep the bacterial growth in check. The first method uses an Air Sparger, which brings in air as the recirculation water passes through it. This puts oxygen in the water stream and helps control the anaerobic bacteria. The second method adds an enzyme into the recirculation water, plus uses the Air Sparger. The enzyme breaks down the dissolved organic material in the water, which takes away the bacteria's food source to keep their population controlled. The third method used is the addition of ozone, which is a powerful disinfectant similar to chlorine.The ozone kills the bacteria to provide a nearly-bacteria free water.Also,ozone oxidizes dyes in the water, so it will remove the color created by wash chemicals(i.e.,triple foams). Stormwater Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route. The car wash development would consist of approximately 22,343 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 38% of the overall site total. A 20-foot landscaping setback will be included along the Project's eastern boundary (between Parcel 2 and 3) and a 45-foot landscaping setback will be provided along the Project's southern boundary.An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the Project's southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping. These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment.In addition,the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 7 Page 390 Project Description Project Construction Details Default assumptions for construction phases were used, and construction of the proposed car wash is anticipated to take approximately four to six months to complete. Soil cut and fill will be balanced on site. Details about construction (e.g. start date,schedule,number of workers,number and type of equipment)are not available at this time;therefore,default construction details were used where necessary throughout the analysis.The proposed development will connect to existing water,sanitary sewer,electricity,and gas facilities.Water and sewer service are provided by the Cucamonga valley Water District. Electricity would be provided by Southern California Edison and natural gas will be provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Utility undergrounding would be required. The start date for construction is not currently known as of the circulation of this document.As such, CalEEMod default settings for construction were utilized to provide an estimate of construction phasing, scheduling, equipment, etc. (See Appendix A). As shown in the CalEEMod output file in Appendix A of this document, construction was estimated to begin on January 1, 2020 and conclude June 10, 2020 for an approximately 6-month construction length.As shown in Table 2, Construction Schedule,construction will include a demolition phase,site preparation phase, grading phase, building construction phase, paving phase, and architectural coating phase. Demolition activities will include use of concrete saws, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Site Preparation activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers,and tractor/loaders.Grading activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers,and tractor/loaders. Building Construction activities will include use of a crane, forklifts, generator sets, tractor/loaders, and welders. Paving activities will include use of cement and mortar mixers, pavers, rollers, and tractor/loaders.Architectural Coating activities will include use of air compressors. Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. The number of construction workers is not known at this time. Table 2 Construction Schedule Start End No. Construction Phase Date Date Days Construction Equipment Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 1 Concrete Saw, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader,Water Truck Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 3 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader,Water Truck Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 100 Crane, Forklift, Generator Set, Tractor/Loader,Welder Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 Cement Mixer, Paver, Roller, Tractor/Loader Architectural Coatings 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 Air Compressor 2.9- Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. A gas station project is currently under construction immediately to the west of the Project site at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue.To the west of the gas station,on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue is vacant land designated for office professional uses. Immediately to the east of the Project site are single-family homes.To the south of the Project site,on the south side of Arrow Route, is a strip-mall retail center with various businesses. Surrounding uses are summarized in Table 3, Surrounding Land Uses. 8 Initial Study Page 391 Project Description Table 3 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Zoning District Existing Land Use Project Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 1:Vacant Land Site Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential 4-8 du/ac Parcel 2: Single Family Home North Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Mulberry Early Education Center South General Commercial/ General Commercial (GC)/ Strip Mall/ Low Medium Residential Low Density Residential 2-4 du/ac Single Family Homes East Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential 4-8 du/ac Single Family Home West General Commercial/ General Commercial (GC)/ Gas Station Under Construction/ Office Office Professional OP Vacant Land 2.10— Environmental Setting The Project is located on two parcels (one vacant) in a developed area in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California.The Project site is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and the area is built-out and urbanized. Disturbed non-native vegetation and limited pavement is located on the site. The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, vacant land and residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). • The site contains a local landmark known as the Beverly Hills House.The Beverly Hills House includes limited historic landscaping in the immediate vicinity of the structure. • The site does not contain scenic resources. • The site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes. • On-site vegetation consists of disturbed non-native vegetation and pavement and does not provide suitable habitat for any sensitive, or special status species. • There are no on-site water features indicative of potential riparian habitat or wetlands. 2.11 — Required Approvals The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the only land use authority for this Project requiring the following approvals: • Conditional Use Permit • Design Review • General Plan Amendment • Zone Change 2.12— Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required None Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 9 Page 392 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 10 Initial Study Page 393 Banyan 51 '6'qaD St Lvm�Ave 00 (EO (21 D Foothill Fwy 6 Vctarta Paes Ln A L T A LOMA 13—L—Rd Red Hill Park IR Dn-4 oy Victoria Ga Rancho Z Cucamonga S a Project Lem St ah St U Location Generalir 51h St E ft St fcxl'i 51 a. Cucamonga-Guasti z c Ontario Mills Regional Park hdaftd I.pl,&Bled qv oh Blvd Ontario E Airp*rt Or International Airport P Go gle Source:Google Maps Not to Scale http:f/www,migcom.com-951-787-9222 Exhibit I Regional Context Map Arbor Express Car Wash Project Rancho Cucamonga,California Page 394 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 12 Initial Study Page 395 M A Eamly E-ducairon Cenier All tYo1icnaChuich (Inland Cann rs� Cr a CL In InParma � i p`ucd SIT Acrow flowe Atrow Route Armw RG4lir Wealeatei nl ] �cafe Medical Crnte�r -Fhck In the Box E 3 A.%An "Leapue Comm Dr Goa gre -Ex Wm Car Woh Site r _ _ _ -Change from Low Medium R mdeniial to General Co mnercial hDttD Sulm r r ' -Change from Lour Medium Residental ra.Medium Fhgh Re-3idential Exhibit 2 Project Vici n ityflap Ar bo r Ex p ress Ca r Was h Project Ra nc h c Coca m onga CaiFfbm is Page 396 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 14 Initial Study Page 397 EY'9WAS:#P*N* rRP9�dSS'OCa+41IV! 44.G��LL 'S 55 1l SITESUMMARY BLJ IL DINGS=MBIHE D FOOTPRINTp 5.232 SO.FT. LA DSCAPINIG L38%� 10% MIN 22.34.3 SOFT CONCRETE 31.725 SO FT. SITE TOTAL(1.85 C�kES) 1%.300 S❑ FT # # m DEDICATiON 1 DDITIOMNALLANDSOAPIN — �XCLUIEG FR'O" YOT,4LS AUCVQ 2.@M SO.FT L PARKING SUMMARY '•i � a � Ili�tl�t` VAC LIUMS -32 STA�Ls i * I wloL CUSTOMER-EMPLOYER .8 STALLS LOADING(1 d'X 241) 1 STALL yLOM Mal, l I OiIIQ L1WQ$ChRti p _ w►L R •YY F' ILRB ib L� mn;&mri I a- e CKM p-y+ • Y ` 4 u L6 d OttI 470 �i1 Cary ocru_CENTM-� J. --- DW a wrra oarM $ i l �t {tip � PCd �F�+i�rF7 �� • r - I I'oc��ni fa4lGY! WYtlg+�if R! L.�IF07GM[ i __F � Pl70.�9lI rllIX Liu vF3N6Er* ti r}tiF win*lrrt WNW SO•C���i1�FI u tmlcrmu QPWE APPr4 AC14 r� Source:Southwest Deg g n Group Exhibit 3 Site Plan Ar bo r Ex p ress Ca r Vas h Project Ra nc ho Cuca mong a,Ca lifor n is Page 398 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 16 Initial Study Page 399 Q r Wash Bu it di rig 4 � r i N R_ X_ . Tw=z ir.r ya4+ �YMEW 4+W++ ti 6.4 t i i L I -- 71i �_-Im Lj -map I �1fiR R+r • Detail Center Building m"? -0 :rl le leellw i I �'' +I�a■irll� Source:SoLOwest Design Group - :, Fxh ibit 4 FI oor Pla n s Arbor Express Car Wash Pfoject Ra nc ho Cuca mong a,Ca ObrrOa Page 400 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 18 Initial Study Page 401 Car Wadi BuildIn g F. Arc- , 1or -W Im w 1w Eno x f� ' r ..... •.1.-ILI' 11,h - , — u7'{IfliLal.�i �•fli JL •+--1- � .�ILiidr ir�L� } RAP�} GM7=MT"""" Det-arj Center Building 0.. IIWM 4013.m..� k1 Ta ado -I J17Ms 1 l J 7t1 MGf fto R PR ,,��{{ 4F k71 f ilfk'AYIfJ\MM pw 15�1RL�IJti�'�IWn I4tifIIl54'�ISk Source:SkutFn5t Design Group Exhibit 5 Elevations k>p_tix,.M,rry ar.an.9 s 1.tv�a Arbor Express Car Wash Project Rancho Cucamonga.California Page 402 Project Description This Page Intentionally Left Blank 20 Initial Study Page 403 3 Determination 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact'as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards&Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.2- Determination I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the Project MAY have a 'potentially significant impact' or 'potentially significant unless mitigated' impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required. Name:Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Date Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 21 Page 404 Determination This Page Intentionally Left Blank 22 Initial Study Page 405 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.1 - Aesthetics Would the Project: Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant with Significant No Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within El El El view from a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its El El El surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020.The report is attached as Appendix B. 4 No Impact. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two ways. First,a structure may be constructed that blocks the view of a vista. Second, the vista itself may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Managing Land Use,Community Design and Historic Resources chapter,the primary scenic resources within the City include the San Gabriel Mountains and the foothills.' The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level. The Project is located on two adjacent parcels(one undeveloped parcel and one parcel with an occupied single-family home),within a fully urbanized area, visually dominated by commercial uses, residential uses, and surface streets. This site is not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista.2 Compliance with Municipal Code guidelines and regulations restricting height would ensure that views of scenic resources, including views of the San Bernardino Mountains to the north, would be preserved through standard height restrictions. Views of the surrounding hillsides from the Project site are obstructed by existing development and landscaping and are limited. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point,which complies with the City's Zoning Code(Section 17.36.030)restrictions for building height.The Project will include a 6-foot concrete wall between the car wash and the Beverly Hills House; however, this wall will not block existing views of scenic vistas to the north. Because the proposed development would not result in structures greater in height than currently exists in the vicinity, development of the Project and accessory landscaping elements would have no effect on a scenic vista. The Project Application also includes a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately east of the Project site located at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route. While the change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential would lead to a higher residential density capacity on the parcel, any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to scenic vistas at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City's Municipal Code height restrictions for residential uses.As such,the Project would result in no direct or indirect impact with respect to view of a scenic vista. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 23 Page 406 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts b) No Impact.The Project is located in an urbanized area and not adjacent to a designated state scenic highway or eligible state scenic highway as identified on the California Scenic Highway Mapping System.3 Additionally, as discussed in Section 4.1.c. below, the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, as construction and operation of the proposed Project would not result in any changes or damage to the Beverly House (Please also see discussion of vibration-related impacts in Section 4.1.2(Noise)of this document). Because the Project is not located adjacent to a designated or eligible state scenic highway, and the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, no impact to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway or local scenic road would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Development of the Project could result in a significant impact if it resulted in substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Degradation of visual character or quality is defined by substantial changes to the existing site appearance through construction of structures such that they are poorly designed or conflict with the site's existing surroundings. Construction of the proposed Project would result in short-term impacts to the existing visual character and quality of the area. Construction activities would require the use of equipment and storage of materials within the Project site. However, construction activities are temporary and would not result in any permanent visual impact. Upon Project completion,the Project would consist of one car wash facility that includes a car wash tunnel, office, restrooms, vacuum area, and parking. Access to the site will be provided via a shared 50-foot driveway on Arrow Route. The building heights will not exceed 24 feet at its highest point. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point, which complies with the City's Zoning Code (Section 17.36.030) restrictions for building height. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches,decorative doors and columns,and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area.The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building.Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of "Alumawood" arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Parcel 1 is undeveloped,while Parcel 2 contains a single-family residence. Project construction would result in demolition of the vacant single-family home. While no direct or indirect changes to the single-family residence located to the east of the site (the Beverly Hills House)would occur as a result of construction of the proposed Project, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial could alter the visual character of the Project site and its surroundings. According to the Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report, the residence directly to the east of the Project site, dubbed the Beverly Hills House, has been designated in the City's Historic Landmarks Points of Interest as City Landmark#32.According to the report,the Beverly Hills House was constructed between 1927 and 1932,and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location. Evaluations performed during the Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed Project recommended the property as eligible for listing in the California Register;therefore,the Beverly Hills House is recommended a historical resource(i.e., significant) under CEQA. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property and no direct or indirect impacts from construction and operation of the car wash development would occur. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House in the future, they will take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property's setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity,and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark.This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting.A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C).Therefore,the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact 24 Initial Study Page 407 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts on the building's integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its circa 1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a substantial negative impact to the visual character of the site or its surroundings. The Project is adjacent to a gas station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, as well as strip-mall type commercial uses on the south side of Arrow Route, across from the proposed Project. Surrounding uses are generally one to two stories in height, which is similar to the proposed car wash building. The surrounding area is not visually distinct and does not portray a particular architectural theme or aesthetic. However,there is a historical theme relating to the region's agricultural past,that the City encourages in proposed development projects.These themes have been incorporated into the proposed Project. Therefore, the car wash development would represent a new commercial feature within a primarily commercial area. Because of the commercial uses in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, the addition of the Project would provide a new architectural aesthetic in an area that is older in character and would not conflict with the existing character. With specified design features included, the car wash development and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial would have less than significant impacts on the visual character of the site and the surroundings.Additionally,any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to impacts to the visual character of the site and its surroundings at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City's Municipal Code and General Plan Design Guidelines for residential uses. Impacts will be less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. Excessive or inappropriately directed lighting can adversely impact night-time views by reducing the ability to see the night sky and stars. Glare can be caused from unshielded or misdirected lighting sources. Reflective surfaces(i.e., polished metal)can also cause glare. Impacts associated with glare range from simple nuisance to potentially dangerous situations (i.e., if glare is directed into the eyes of motorists). Sources of daytime glare are typically concentrated in commercial areas and are often associated with retail uses. Glare results from development and associated parking areas that contain reflective materials such as hi-efficiency window glass, highly polished surfaces, and expanses of pavement. There are lighting sources adjacent to this site, including free-standing street lights, light fixtures on buildings, and pole- mounted lights. The car wash development includes interior lighting and outdoor security lighting. Light spillover and glare would be avoided by requiring that light be designed to Project downward and prohibiting the creation of glare on adjacent properties per the requirements of Municipal Code Section 17.58.050.A-D (General Lighting Requirements).The Project also includes solar roof panels; however, solar roof panels are designed to absorb light and would not cause glare. Compliance with the Municipal Code standards for lighting and glare during construction and operation of the proposed Project would ensure that lighting and glare impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The potential aesthetic impacts related to views and aesthetics are generally site specific.As discussed above, Project-related impacts would be less than significant. Lighting and sources of glare, while not always site-specific,would be consistent with the majority of the surrounding urban area and would be used during similar hours as surrounding uses. While the Project plus cumulative development would change the appearance of the site and surrounding area,all development Projects would be expected to be conditioned to follow applicable local planning and design guidelines as specified in Section 17.58.050 of the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, aesthetic impacts are not expected to be cumulatively considerable and no adverse impacts would occur. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 25 Page 408 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.2- Agriculture and Forest Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of ❑ ❑ ❑ the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section ❑ ❑ ❑ 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to ❑ ❑ ❑ non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? a) No Impact.The Project would be located in a fully developed, urbanized area that does not contain agriculture or forest uses. The Important Farmland in California (2014) prepared by the Department of Conservation identifies the Project site as Urban and Built-Up Land and does not identify the Project site as being Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.4 Therefore, there would be no conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use as a result of construction of the proposed Project. No impact would occur. b) No Impact.No Williamson Act contracts are active for the Project site.5 Therefore,there would be no conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. 26 Initial Study Page 409 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts c) No Impact.Public Resources Code§12220(g)identifies forest land as land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. The Project site and surrounding properties are not currently being managed or used for forest land as identified in Public Resources Code § 12220(g). The Project site has already been disturbed by previous development and is surrounded by residential and commercial uses.Therefore, development of this Project would have no impact to any timberland zoning. d) No Impact.The Project site is partially developed, disturbed land with limited non-native vegetation;thus,there would be no loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non-forest use as a result of this Project. No impact would occur. e) No Impact. The Project site is a partially developed site within an urban environment. The Project is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and surface streets.None of the surrounding sites contains existing forest uses.Development of the proposed Project would not change the existing environment in a manner that would result in the conversion of forestland to a non-forest use. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact on agricultural and forestry resources. Development of the Project would not preclude or hinder existing or future agricultural operations in the surrounding area. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 27 Page 410 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.3— Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or ❑ ❑ ❑ Projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air ❑ ❑ ❑ quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if the Project conflicts with or obstructs implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Conflicts and obstructions that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet attainment deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable air quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South Coast Air Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project(1)does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP.6 Consistency review is presented below: (1) The Project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, as demonstrated herein; therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standard violation. (2)The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant Projects. Significant Projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and off-shore drilling facilities. This Project is considered significant because it includes a General Plan Amendment. This Consistency Criterion refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the 2016 AQMP.The 2016 AQMP was designed to achieve attainment for all criteria air pollutants within the Basin while still accommodating growth in the region. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. Therefore, if the growth under the Project is consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by SCAG in the RTPISCS, plan 28 Initial Study Page 411 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts implementation would be consistent with the AQMP,even if emissions could potentially exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily emissions thresholds. The proposed Project would result in the loss of one (1) single-family residential unit with a decrease of between two (2) and six (6) residents. The Project will also result in an increase of employees in the area by approximately three (3) to six (6) employees. The 2016 RTP/SCS population and employment projections for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as well as the decrease in population and increase in employment that would occur with the implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, are shown in Table 4(RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions). Table 4 RTP/SCS and Sp ecific Plan Growth Assum tions Proposed Project Population Employment Arbor Car Wash and GPA/ZCA -2 to-6 3 to 6 RTCISCS Growth 2012-2040 34,200 34,700 Within Growth Assumptions? Yes Yes Source:SCAG 2016.7 As shown in Table 4, the implementation of the proposed Project would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP. Impacts will be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact.A project may have a significant impact if Project-related emissions would exceed federal, state, or regional standards or thresholds, or if Project-related emissions would substantially contribute to existing or Project air quality violations.The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin,where efforts to attain state and federal air quality standards are governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). Both the state of California (state) and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants (known as `criteria pollutants'). These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), inhalable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less(PM,o),fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The state has also established AAQS for additional pollutants. The AAQS are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace within a reasonable margin of safety.Where the state and federal standards differ, California AAQS are more stringent than the national AAQS (except for Federal NO2 standards which are stricter). Air pollution levels are measured at monitoring stations located throughout the air basin. Areas that are in nonattainment with respect to federal or state AAQS are required to prepare plans and implement measures that will bring the region into attainment. Table 5, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status, summarizes the attainment status in the Project area for the criteria pollutants. Discussion of potential impacts related to short-term construction impacts and long-term area source and operational impacts are presented below. Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant Federal State Os 1-hr -- Nonattainment 03 8-hr Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Attainment Nonattainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Pb Nonattainment Attainment Source:ARB,2020.See Appendix A. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 29 Page 412 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Construction Emissions Short-term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities related to development of the proposed car wash. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). To determine if construction of the Project could result in a significant air quality impact, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 has been utilized.CaIEEMod defaults have generally been used as construction inputs into the model(see Appendix A), with modifications to the model described in detail below. The methodology for calculating emissions is included in the CaIEEMod User Guide, freely available at http://www.caleemod.com. The "Automobile Care Center" land use category was used in the model to represent the proposed car wash and detail center, and a total of 7,292 square feet of floor area was included. A total of 39,254 square feet of the "Other Asphalt Surfaces" land use category was used in the model to account for on-site surface parking and the covered vacuum stalls. Finally, a total of 18,267 square feet of landscaping was also included in the model as "Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces". Demolition of the single-family home on Parcel 2 would occur as a result of Project construction;therefore,a total of 1,912 square feet of demolition was included in the model.Soils imports and exports will balance on site. Construction activities are anticipated to start in January 2019 and be completed by summer 2019.As such,the first full operational year for the Project will be 2020.CaIEEMod defaults for equipment needs were utilized. Based on the results of the model,maximum daily emissions from the construction of the car wash would not result in excessive emissions of criteria pollutants. As indicated in Table 6, Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs./day), emissions of criteria pollutants would not exceed SCAQMD daily construction thresholds. Impact would be less than significant. Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions Ibslda Source ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2019 17.01 25.40 16.01 0.03 3.82 2.19 Winter 2019 17.01 25.44 16.00 0.03 3.82 2.19 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No Source:MIG,2018.See Appendix A. Operational Emissions Operation of the proposed car wash facility would result in long-term criteria air pollutant emissions. Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions, energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions would result from vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the proposed car wash. Area source emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape maintenance equipment,use of consumer products, and periodic repainting of the small structure. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas. The proposed car wash consists of one automated tunnel designed to reclaim and recycle water. According to the International Carwash Association,"self-serve"automatic car washes use approximately 30 gallons of freshwater per vehicle.$ As such,water use for the proposed car wash was estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle—though each individual vehicle washed would require more water, the Project Proponent estimates that the car wash would recycle up to 86% of all water used. As such, 30 gallons per vehicle is likely an overestimation for total water usage. Number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day, based on the Project proponent's estimates of similar developments. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually, total water demand is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year. Because data are not widely available on energy consumption by the type of vacuums used at these types of facilities,the default energy use amounts were.CaIEEMod was utilized to estimate mobile source emissions. Project trip generation rates were taken from the Project Traffic Impact Analysis,performed by Trames Solutions,Inc.in September 2018(See Appendix G).9 CaIEEMod also includes default outdoor water demand for landscape irrigation. Default inputs for all operational sources were used for the Project. Daily operational emissions as estimated by CaIEEMod are summarized in Table 7, Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions. Operational emissions generated by operation of the car wash would not exceed the thresholds established by SCAQMD. Impacts will be less than significant. 30 Initial Study Page 413 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions Ibs/da Source ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 PIVI2.5 Summer Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.24 5.70 14.55 0.05 3.72 1.03 Summer Total 1.43 5.76 14.61 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.20 5.81 13.91 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Total 1.39 5.87 13.97 0.05 3.72 1.03 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Potentially Significant? No No No No No No Source:MIG,2018.See Appendix A. c) Less than Significant Impact.Cumulative short-term,construction-related emissions from the Project will not contribute considerably to any potential cumulative air quality impact because short-term Project emissions will be less than significant and other concurrent construction Projects in the region will be required to implement standard air quality regulations and mitigation pursuant to State CEQA requirements,just as this Project has.The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook identifies methodologies for analyzing long-term cumulative air quality impacts for criteria pollutants for which the Basin is nonattainment. These methodologies identify three performance standards that can be used to determine if long-term emissions will result in cumulative impacts. Essentially,these methodologies assess growth associated with a land use Project and are evaluated for consistency with regional Projections. These methodologies are outdated and are no longer recommended by SCAQMD. SCAQMD allows a project to be analyzed using the Projection method such that consistency with the AQMP will indicate that a project will not contribute considerably to cumulative air quality impacts. As discussed in AQMP Consistency, the Project is consistent with growth assumptions in the AQMP and would not exceed any applicable SCAQMD thresholds for short-and long-term emissions.Therefore,the Project will not contribute to any potential cumulative air quality impacts. d) Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are those segments of the population that are most susceptible to poor air quality such as children,the elderly,the sick,and athletes who perform outdoors. Land uses associated with sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers,and retirement homes. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed Project include residences to the east and the early childhood education center to the north of the site. Localized Significance Thresholds As part of SCAQMD's environmental justice program,attention has recently been focusing more on the localized effects of air quality. Although the region may be in attainment for a particular criteria pollutant, localized emissions from construction activities coupled with ambient pollutant levels can cause localized increases in criteria pollutant that exceed national and/or State air quality standards. Construction LST's Construction-related criteria pollutant emissions and potentially significant localized impacts from the proposed car wash were evaluated pursuant to the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. This methodology provides screening tables for one through five-acre Project scenarios,depending on the amount of site disturbance during a day using the Fact Sheet for equipment usage in CalEEMod.10 Daily oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) emissions will occur during site preparation and grading activities on the site. Table 8, Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (Ibs/day), summarizes on- and off-site emissions as compared to the local Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 31 Page 414 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts thresholds established for Source Receptor Area (SRA) 32 (Northwest San Bernardino Valley). The car wash site is approximately 1.36-acres in size; therefore,the 1-acre threshold was used.A 25-meter receptor distance was used to reflect the proximity of the single-family home located just to the east of the Project site. This receptor is the closest to the Project site;therefore,would have the highest noise impacts. Table 8 Car Wash Localized Si nificance Threshold Anal sis Ibslda Phase CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 14.89 22.68 2.13 1.33 Site Preparation 7.89 19.48 3.73 2.17 Grading 6.61 16.04 3.01 1.82 Building Construction 13.49 15.98 0.92 0.88 Paving 8.90 9.17 0.52 0.48 Architectural Coating 1.84 1.84 0.13 0.13 Threshold 863 118 5 4 Potentially Substantial? No No No No Source:MIG,2018.See Appendix A. As shown in Table 7, emissions of NOX and CO will be greatest during demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction activities associated with the proposed car wash. Emissions of particulate matter will be greatest during site preparation and grading activities. It should be noted that the CaIEEMod results summarized in Table 8 include application of SCAQMD Rule 403 and require the utilization of applicable best management practices to minimize fugitive dust emissions. A 50 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions is assumed based on rule requirements(while the Project Construction Noise Analysis states that water trucks would not be used during construction, such trucks will in fact be used to control fugitive dust during Project construction- See Section 4.12 for Noise Analysis). Based on CaIEEMod calculations, and assuming that exposed areas will be watered two times daily during construction activities, localized emissions of criteria pollutants will not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds during construction of the proposed car wash. Impacts will be less than significant. Operation LST's Operation-related LSTs become of concern when there are substantial on-site stationary sources such as smoke stacks or furnaces that could impact surrounding receptors.The Project does not include such on-site operations,and the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not permit such operations;therefore, impacts related to operational LSTs will not occur. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate State and Federal CO standards at intersections, even if the broader Basin is in attainment for Federal and State levels. The California Department of Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (Protocol) screening procedures have been utilized to determine if the Project could potentially result in a CO hotspot. Based on the recommendations of the Protocol, a screening analysis should be performed for the Project to determine if a detailed analysis will be required. The California Department of Transportation notes that because of the age of the assumptions used in the screening procedures and the obsolete nature of the modeling tools utilized to develop the screening procedures in the Protocol, they are no longer accepted. More recent screening procedures based on more current methodologies have been developed. The SCAQMD has not developed a screening threshold. The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) developed a screening threshold in 2011, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 31,600 vehicles per hour or more will require detailed analysis. In addition,the Bay Area Air Quality Management District developed a screening threshold in 2010, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 44,000 vehicles per hour would require detailed analysis. Additionally, a CMP Intersection refers to the intersection of two CMP roadways, of which both Arrow Highway and Archibald are considered CMP roadways." However, the Project's operations would not generate 31,600 or 44,000 vehicle trips per hour.The Project would also not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where 32 Initial Study Page 415 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited(e.g.,tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway). Finally, the Project is consistent with the applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. Therefore, the Project passes the screening analysis and impacts are deemed less than significant. Based on the local analysis procedures,the Project would not result in a CO hotspot,and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e) Less than Significant Impact.According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations,wastewater treatment plants, landfills,and certain industrial operations(such as manufacturing uses that produce chemicals,paper,etc.).Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes, as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills.The proposed Project does not include any of the above noted uses or processes.While short- term odors could be generated during construction as a result of activities like asphalt laying and application of architectural coatings,these impacts will be temporary and will cease upon Project completion. Less than significant impacts would occur. Cumulative Impacts No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The SCAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project's individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin's existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the SCAQMD construction and/or operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact. As described in this section, the proposed car wash operational emissions would not exceed thresholds. Therefore,the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 33 Page 416 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.4- Biological Resources Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special status species in local ❑ ❑ ❑ or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the ❑ ❑ ❑ California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal ❑ ❑ ❑ pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or ❑ ❑ ❑ impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other ❑ ❑ ❑ approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 34 Initial Study Page 417 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a) Less than Significant Impact.According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife BIOS viewer, a total of six sensitive wildlife species and no sensitive plant species were identified as occurring within the Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, within which the Project site is Iocated.12 However, given the previously disturbed nature of the site and surrounding area, it is highly unlikely that any plant or wildlife species listed by the State and/or Federal government as endangered or threatened occur at the Project site. Based on site visits there is limited ornamental landscaping and trees on site; however, there is no identifiable natural habitat on site. Construction of the car wash will include replacement of existing ornamental landscaping with similar landscaping upon Project completion. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur with construction of the Project. b-c) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home.According to the federal National Wetlands Inventory, the Project site does not contain any riparian habitat or wetlands and the Project would not disturb any offsite wetlands.13 There is no vegetation or on-site water features indicative of potential wetlands. No impact would occur. d) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.The Project site consists of two parcels:one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home.The site is bounded by roadways to the west and south,a school to the north, and residential uses to the east, preventing the use of the Project site and surrounding area as a wildlife corridor.There are no substantial vegetated areas or waterbodies located onsite that could serve as habitat. However,there are a number of trees on the Project site that have the potential to provide habitat for nesting birds.Vegetation communities on the Project Site have the potential to provide nesting habitat for bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) Sections 3503 and 3513.There is potential for ground-and tree-nesting birds to establish nests on the Project Site prior to project construction. Destruction of, or disturbance to, an active nest is prohibited. Construction activities including site mobilization, tree removal other vegetation clearing activities, grubbing, grading, and noise/vibration from the operation of heavy equipment also has the potential to result in significant direct(i.e., death or physical harm)and/or indirect (i.e., nest abandonment) impacts to nesting birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures 13I0-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season(typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities(including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging,clearing,grubbing,vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area(in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five(5)days or longer occurs,an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest,the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes(e.g.young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 35 Page 418 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts e) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home.The Project includes the removal of five trees.The proposed Project will comply with the provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.80, Tree Preservation), which prohibits the removal of a City tree by any person or entity other than the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no City trees on the Project site. Therefore, development of the proposed express car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. No impact will occur. f) No Impact. The Project site is not within any Habitat Conservation Plan area and no impacts would occur.14 Cumulative Impacts As discussed above, impacts related to Biological Resources are anticipated to be less than significant. Similar to the proposed car wash development,all cumulative Projects would be subject to individual project review and conformance with conservation plans and standard provisions for compliance with state and federal protection laws. Since Project- related impacts would be less than significant and because cumulative Project-related impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation, the cumulative impact from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would be expected to be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. 36 Initial Study Page 419 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.5- Cultural Resources Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as ❑ ❑ ❑ defined in '15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ❑ ElElpursuant to'15064.5? ie c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique ❑ El Elgeologic feature? Rr d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? ❑ ❑ ❑ A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020 and provides the basis for the analysis in this Section. a) Less than Significant Impact.The Project site encompasses approximately 1.36 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and a privately-owned residential property to the east. To the west of the site is a parcel currently being developed with a gas station. As discussed in the Historical Resources Evaluation, a cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC),and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project. The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings,one historic road,and one historic district)have been recorded within one-mile of the Project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the Project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the Project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). As such, it is not a recommended "historical resource" under CEQA and does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) is known as the Beverly Hills House. The Beverly Hills House was designated as City Landmark #32 in 1989. The listing criteria was requested and not available to the applicant.Access issues to the Beverly Hills house prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore, the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e., significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state"a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource...may have a significant effect on the environment." Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as "demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired" (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a "substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource." The Project includes demolition of the existing single-family home on Parcel 2, construction of an express car wash and detail center, and associated parking and landscaping improvements and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial on Parcel 2.The Project has been designed to include a 6-foot concrete-block wall and 20-foot setback to provide a buffer along the eastern and northern edges of the development. Construction of the car wash development will involve Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 37 Page 420 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts minimal ground disturbing activities. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. This change would not authorize any development on this parcel and, pursuant to CEQA, any future proposed development would be required to analyze potential impacts to historical resources at such time that an application is submitted to the City. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to review and approval by the City's Historic Preservation Commission. No physical changes to the Beverly Hills House would occur with development of the car wash and there are no direct impacts to the Beverly Hills House from the car wash development.The Project will not result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the resource would be impaired. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since Project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House,they would take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. The Project proposes to construct an express carwash adjacent to the house at 9786 Arrow Route,"The Beverly Hills House."The Project will take place on parcels adjacent to the Beverly Hills House property, and the house will be preserved in place. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property's setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity,and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark.This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting.A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C).Therefore,the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact on the building's integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its c1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a significant adverse to a historical resource. The proposed Project does not include any direct or indirect changes to the Beverly Hills House and is therefore preserving the house and property as they currently exist.According to the Historical Resources Evaluation, construction and operation of the express car wash development would not cause a substantial adverse change in the Beverly Hills House. There would be no direct impact on the resource; therefore,there would be no adverse impact. In the future should any physical changes be proposed for the Beverly Hills House, the City would require completion of an evaluation to determine eligibility for listing in the California Register.Any applicant(s) for future development at 9786 Arrow Route would be required to conduct a full historic resource impact analysis on the Beverly Hills House prior to receipt of demolition permits.The analysis would include the following: 1) a full California Register eligibility evaluation of the Beverly Hills House, 2) an analysis of direct and indirect construction and operation impacts of the proposed development on the Beverly Hills House, and 3) recommendations for mitigation measures, if necessary. If it is determined that the development would result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the Beverly Hills House, such that the significance of the resource would be impaired, the applicant would be required to implement the recommended mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the City's Community Development Director and/or Historic Preservation Commission. Mitigation measures shall include, but not be limited to,data collection,preservation of the resource in place, or resource relocation. Should the property be determined to be eligible, a report would be prepared indicating options for mitigation in priority preference order of Preservation, Data Collection, and Resource Relocation. As such,the Project will have a less than significant impact. b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the cultural resources records search and field survey, findings for archaeological resources were negative. Given the urbanized nature of the Project vicinity, previously recorded archaeological resources are not anticipated to be uncovered during Project construction activities. However,formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically,the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians(SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. In addition, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 and GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant. 38 Initial Study Page 421 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities,all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer)shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find.Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period.Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources,as defined by CEQA(as amended,2015),are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC.The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified.The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin,the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" or "unique archaeological resource", time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f)for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 39 Page 422 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts c) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.The Project site consists of two previously disturbed parcels. One of the parcels is currently undeveloped (Parcel 1)and one contains a single-family residence(parcels 2).The Project will include demolition of the existing single-family home on parcel 2 and construction of an express car wash and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from residential to commercial on Parcel 2.Any buried paleontological resources would have already been uncovered or destroyed at the time of initial grading of the Project site. However, in the event that paleontological materials are uncovered, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4 are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to previously undiscovered paleontological resources and/or unique geological features that may be accidentally encountered during Project implementation to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that a paleontological sensitivity training for construction personnel be conducted before commencement of excavation activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 requires that a qualified paleontologist conduct periodic paleontological spot checks to determine if excavations have extended into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits as well as the presence of a paleontological monitor during all excavations into the local geologic formation or into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Mitigation Measure CUL-3 requires that ground-disturbing activities be halted or diverted away from the vicinity and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established if paleontological materials are encountered until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires that a professional paleontologist prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring efforts, methodology used, and the description of fossils collected and their significance. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4, impacts to paleontological resources will be less than significant as a result of construction of the proposed car wash. Mitigation Measures CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six(6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits,construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required.The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor,who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity 40 Initial Study Page 423 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of the find so that the find can be evaluated.A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist's discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts,as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance.The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. No known human remains are anticipated to be located on or beneath the Project site. However,formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 to reduce impacts to previously undiscovered buried human remains. In addition, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains. In the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered the contractor is required to halt work in the immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Health and Safety Code § 7050.5, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner,with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a Native American, he/she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 and GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8, impacts to buried human remains will be less than significant. Mitigation Measure SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project,work in the immediate vicinity(within a 100-foot buffer of the find)shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code§7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 41 Page 424 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MILD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe, the term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to,the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation, the Project would result in no impacts to historical resources and less than significant impacts to known archaeological or paleontological resources and known human remains. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other Projects in the region is not likely since Projects would be subject to individual Project-level environmental review.Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect cultural resources and prevent significant impact to paleontological resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. 42 Initial Study Page 425 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.6- Geology and Soils Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on ❑ ❑ ❑ other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ iv) Landslides? El El El b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in ❑ ❑ ❑ on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or ❑ ❑ ❑ property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ❑ ❑ ❑ where sewers are not available for the Se disposal of waste water? a.i) Less than Significant Impact.Although the Project site is located in seismically active Southern California, the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.15 No active faults have been identified at the ground surface on the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 43 Page 426 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an area of high regional seismicity. The Red Hill fault is approximately 3 miles northwest of the Project site and the Cucamonga fault is approximately 5.75 miles north of the Project site.Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the California Building Code (CBC). The 2016 California Building Code (California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Volume 2) contains seismic safety provisions with the aim of preventing building collapse during a design earthquake, so that occupants would be able to evacuate after the earthquake.A design earthquake is one with a two percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, or an average return period of 2,475 years.Adherence to these requirements will reduce the potential of the building from collapsing during an earthquake,thereby minimizing injury and loss of life. Although structures may be damaged during earthquakes, adherence to seismic design requirements will minimize damage to property within the structure because the structure is designed not to collapse. The CBC is intended to provide minimum requirements to prevent major structural failure and loss of life.Adherence to existing regulations will reduce the risk of loss,injury,and death;impacts due to strong ground shaking would be less than significant with construction of the proposed car wash. a.iii) Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction generally occurs as a "quicksand"type of ground failure caused by strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground shaking. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has not yet conducted seismic hazard mapping in the area of the Project site. The San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map does not include the Project site within a liquefaction susceptibility area; therefore, the subsurface conditions at the site are not considered to be conducive to liquefaction.16 Based on the mapping performed by San Bernardino County and the conditions encountered at the site,which have been discussed in detail in previous sections, adverse impacts due to the risk of liquefaction are less than significant. a.iv) No Impact. Landslides are mass movements of the ground that include rock falls, relatively shallow slumping and sliding of soil, and deeper rotational or transitional movement of soil or rock. The Project site is relatively flat and, according to the San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map, is not located within an area susceptible to landslides.Therefore,there would be no impact from landslides on the Project and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Topsoil is used to cover surface areas for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation due to its high concentrations of organic matter and microorganisms. Little native topsoil is likely to occur on the site because of previous development activities. Construction of the proposed Project would have the potential to expose surficial soils to wind and water erosion during construction activities. Wind erosion would be minimized through soil stabilization measures required by South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), such as daily watering. Water erosion would also be prevented through the City's standard erosion control practices (Municipal Code Section 8.21.160) required pursuant to the California Building Code and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), such as silt fencing or berms. Following Project construction, the site would be covered completely by paving, the car wash structure, and landscaping. Impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. c) Less than Significant Impact. Impacts related to liquefaction and landslides are discussed above in Sections 4.6.a and 4.6.15. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The downslope movement is due to gravity and earthquake shaking combined. Such movement can occur on slope gradients of as little as one degree. Lateral spreading typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. Lateral spreading of the ground surface during a seismic activity usually occurs along the weak shear zones within a liquefiable soil layer and has been observed to generally take place toward a free face(i.e.retaining wall,slope,or channel)and to lesser extent on ground surfaces with a very gentle slope. Due to the absence of any channel within or near the Project site, and the subsurface soil conditions that are not conducive to liquefaction, the potential for lateral spread occurring on the Project site is considered to be negligible.As shown above,the Project site is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that has been identified as being unstable or having the potential to result on-site or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence, 44 Initial Study Page 427 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts liquefaction or collapse.The Project site is relatively flat and consists of non-native alluvial soils.The Project is required to be constructed in accordance with the CBC. Compliance with existing CBC regulations would limit hazard impacts arising from unstable soils to less than significant levels. Therefore, the Project would not likely result in landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse and no mitigation is required. d) Less than Significant Impact. It is unknown whether the Project would be located on expansive soils. In any case, the Project would be required to be in conformance with the California Building Code, City regulations, and other applicable standards. Conformance with standard engineering practices and adherence to design criteria would reduce impacts related to expansive soil potential to a less than significant level. e) No Impact. The Project proposes to connect to the existing municipal sewer system. The Project would connect to this system and would not require use of septic tanks. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential cumulative impact related to earth and geology is typically site-specific.The analysis herein determined that the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to landform modification,grading,or the destruction of a geologically significant landform or feature with implementation of mitigation. Moreover, existing State and local laws and regulations are in place to protect people and property from substantial adverse geological and soils effects, including fault rupture, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-induced ground failure(including liquefaction), and landslides. Existing laws and regulations also protect people and property from adverse effects related to soil erosion, expansive soils, loss of topsoil, development on an unstable geologic unit or soil type that could result in on-or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.These existing laws and regulations would render potentially adverse geological and soil effects of the Project to a level considered less than significant. Moreover, these existing laws and regulations ensure that past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region do not result in substantial adverse geological and soils effects. As a result, the existing legal and regulatory framework would ensure that the incremental geological and soils effects of the Project would not result in greater adverse cumulative effects when considered together with the effects of other past,present,and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region.The impacts of the Project-related to geology and soils would be less than cumulatively considerable. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 45 Page 428 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.7- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,that may have a ❑ ❑ ❑ significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse ❑ ❑ ❑ gases? a) Less than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time." Climate change is the result of numerous,cumulative sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world.Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself(e.g., changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet's surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the "greenhouse effect." The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth's surface and warms it.The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation.Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re-radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 600 Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 250 years ago)are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth's temperature.Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities.Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. The County of San Bernardino adopted its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Plan) in 2011, which provides guidance on how to analyze GHG emissions and determine significance during the CEQA review of proposed development projects within the County of San Bernardino.The reduction strategies in the GHG Plan correspond to reduction measures. Measurable reductions in GHG emissions are achieved through adherence to the County's DRP procedures. The County's GHG DRP procedures, updated in 2015, are streamlined by 1) applying a uniform set of performance standards to all development project, and 2) utilizing Screening Tables to mitigate project GHG emissions. Projects have the option of preparing a project- specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate GHG emissions in lieu of the utilizing the Screening Tables. A review standard of 3,000 MT CO2e per year is used to identify projects that require the use of Screening Tables or a project-specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate project emissions. 46 Initial Study Page 429 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Projects that exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e per year are required to either achieve a minimum 100 points per the Screening Tables or a 31% reduction over 2007 emissions levels. Consistent with CEQA guidelines,such projects would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. The car wash project will include activities that emit greenhouse gas emissions over the short- and long-term. While one Project could not be said to cause global climate change, individual Projects contribute cumulatively to greenhouse gas emissions that result in climate change.A greenhouse gas emissions inventory was prepared for the Project and is analyzed below. Short-Term Emissions The Project will result in short-term greenhouse gas emissions from activities associated with construction of the car wash. Construction assumptions for the proposed Project are discussed in Section 4.3 of this document. Greenhouse gas emissions will be released by equipment used for demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. GHG emissions will also result from worker and vendor trips to and from the site. Table 9, Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, summarizes the estimated yearly emissions from construction activities. Carbon dioxide emissions from construction equipment and worker/vendor trips were estimated utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) version 2016.3.2 (see Appendix A). Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are continuous year after year until operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference,SCAQMD recommends in its draft threshold to amortize construction emissions over a 30- year operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be grouped with operational emissions in order to generate an approximate Project GHG inventory. Amortized car wash construction emissions are included in Table 9. Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction GHG Emissions MTIYR Year CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* 2019 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 TOTAL 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 AMORTIZED TOTAL" 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 *MTCO2E Note:Slight variations may occur due to rounding and variations in modeling software ^Amortized over 30 ears Long-Term Emissions The proposed car wash/detail center activities will result in continuous greenhouse gas emissions from mobile and operational sources. Mobile sources including vehicle trips to and from the development will result primarily in emissions of CO2 with minor emissions of CH4 and N2O. The most significant GHG emission from natural gas usage will be methane. Electricity usage by the Project and indirect usage of electricity for water and wastewater conveyance will result primarily in emissions of carbon dioxide. Disposal of solid waste will result in emissions of methane from the decomposition of waste at landfills coupled with CO2 emission from the handling and transport of solid waste.These sources combine to define the long-term greenhouse gas emissions for construction of the car wash. To determine long-term emissions,CaIEEMod was used.The methodology utilized for each emissions source is based on the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures handbook.18 A summary of the car wash's net long-term greenhouse gas emissions is included in Table 10, Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Mobile sources are based on annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) based on daily trip generation identified in the Project traffic report.19 Natural gas usage and electricity usage are based on default demand figures utilized in CaIEEMod. Solid waste generation is also based on CaIEEMod defaults. Emissions are presented as metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent(MTCO2E) meaning that all emissions have been weighted based on their Global Warming Potential (GWP) (a metric ton is equal to 1.102 US short tons). Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 47 Page 430 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source GHG Emissions MTIYR CO2 CHa N2O TOTAL* Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 36.23 0.00 0.00 36.38 Mobile 766.55 0.04 0.00 767.57 Solid Waste 5.65 0.33 0.00 14.01 Water/Wastewater 10.05 0.06 0.00 12.08 TOTAL 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 MTCO2E/YR Note:Slight variations may occur due to rounding Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Table 11, Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory,summarizes the yearly estimated greenhouse gas emissions from construction and operational sources. The total yearly carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for the car wash are estimated at 834.28 MTCO2E. This does not exceed the established GHG emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year. Impacts from the proposed car wash development will be less than significant. Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventor Source GHG Emissions MTIYR CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Construction 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 Operation 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 Total 834.28 Significance Threshold 3,000 Significant Impact? No MTCO2E/YR Note:Slight variations may occur due to rounding ^Construction impacts amortized over 30 ears b) Less than Significant Impact.As shown above,the Project would be consistent with the County of San Bernardino GHG Plan.Additionally,the Project's consistency with AB 32 and Senate Bill (SB)32 are discussed below. AB 32 Consistency.AB 32 was adopted in 2006 and requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are also consistent with AB 32 goal. The Project would generate GHG emissions, directly and indirectly, from a variety of sources. The CARB Scoping Plan includes strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32. These strategies serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Therefore, the Project would not conflict or otherwise interfere with implementation of AB 32. SB 32 Consistency.SB 32 was adopted in 2016 and requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions 40%below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 codifies the reduction target issued in Executive Order B-30-15. SB 32 builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an interim goal to achieving Executive Order S-3-05's 2050 reduction goal of 80% below 1990 levels. 48 Initial Study Page 431 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts The CARB 2017 Scoping Plan identified reduction measures to achieve the SB 32 GHG reduction goal. Like the previously adopted Scoping Plans,the 2017 Scoping Plan includes statewide reduction measures that are implemented at the state level. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the 2017 Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Additionally,the 2014 Scoping Plan Update indicates"California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as required by AB 32";and it recognizes the potential for California to"reduce emissions by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed in the developed world and to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050." Moreover, the Project does not propose facilities or operations that would substantively interfere with any future County- mandated,state-mandated,or federally-mandated regulations enacted or promulgated to legally require development to assist in meeting state-adopted GHG emissions reduction targets, including those established under Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-15, SIB 32, or the 2017 Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with implementation of SIB 32 or otherwise interfere with implementation of this or future goals. Cumulative Impacts GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective.As discussed above,the Project's emissions would be below the County's threshold for of 3,000 MT per year of CO2e for commercial projects and would not conflict with applicable plans. Thus, the Project's cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be less than significant. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 49 Page 432 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.8- Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑ materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ❑ ❑ ❑ involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile ❑ ❑ ❑ of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,would it create a ❑ ❑ ❑ significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the Project result ❑ ❑ ❑ in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the ❑ ❑ ❑ Project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation ❑ ❑ ❑ plan? 50 Initial Study Page 433 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent ❑ ❑ ❑ to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in a significant hazard to the public if it includes the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or places housing near a facility, which routinely transports, uses, or disposes of hazardous materials. The Project is located within a commercial and residential area and is bound by surface streets, commercial, uses and vacant land. The Project would not place housing near any hazardous materials facilities. The routine use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials is primarily associated with industrial uses, which require such materials for manufacturing operations or produce hazardous wastes as by-products of production applications. The Project includes an express car wash and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential on the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site and does not propose or facilitate any activity involving significant use, routine transport, or disposal of hazardous substances. Construction of the car wash would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents.Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products.Construction would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete.All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. With regard to Project operation, widely used hazardous materials common at commercial uses include paints and other solvents, cleaners, and pesticides. Operation of the proposed car wash would involve the use of cleaning solutions for daily operation and paints for routine maintenance and re-coating of structures. The remnants of these and other products are disposed of as household hazardous waste (HHW) that includes used dead batteries, electronic wastes, and other wastes that are prohibited or discouraged from being disposed of at local landfills. Through compliance with existing regulations, use of common household hazardous materials and their disposal does not present a substantial health risk to the community. Impacts associated with the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes would be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. According to the State Water Resources Control Board, there are no open cases of leaking underground storage tanks(LUST)within one-quarter mile of the Project site.20 The property located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald that is scheduled to be developed with a gas station, is the site of a former gas station and a former LUST cleanup site. This case has been closed since 2001, and according to the Project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA), performed by RGS Engineering Geology, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on,or migrating onto the site,is considered low(See Appendix C, Phase I ESA).There would be a less than significant impact related to the release of hazardous materials into the environment as a result of development of the proposed car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Construction of the Project would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents.Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products.Construction of the proposed express car wash would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete.All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 51 Page 434 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. Activities associated with the demolition of the existing single-family home may pose a hazard with regard to asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paints. ACM were used on a widespread basis in building construction prior to and into the 1980s; therefore, it is assumed that ACM is present on the Project site and will need to be handled following specific regulations/guidelines described below. Asbestos generally does not pose a threat when it remains intact.When asbestos is disturbed it becomes airborne.SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires work practices that limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and disturbance of ACM.21 This rule is designed to protect uses and persons adjacent to demolition or renovation activity from exposure to asbestos emissions. Rule 1403 requires a certified inspector to survey any facility being demolished or renovated for the presence of all friable and Class I and Class II non-friable ACM. The applicant must also notify SCAQMD of their intent to perform demolition or renovation of any buildings that may contain asbestos prior to demolition and requires that all ACM is removed prior to any demolition. Rule 1403 also establishes notification procedures, removal procedures, handling and clean-up procedures, storage, disposal, landfilling requirements, and warning label requirements, including HEPA filtration,the"glovebag"method,wetting,and some methods of dry removal that must be implemented when disturbing appreciable amounts of ACM (more than 100 square feet of surface area).All ACM shall be disposed of at a waste disposal site operated in accordance with Rule 1403.The applicant will also ensure the safety of construction workers involved in the ACM removal by complying with all California Asbestos Standards in Construction, including, but not limited to minimum air circulations, use of respirators, wetting of materials, clothing laundering, construction and demolition equipment requirements, and shielding specifications. Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 1403 would ensure that impacts related to the release of ACM are less than significant. Exposure of construction workers to lead-based paint during demolition activities is also of concern, similar to exposure to asbestos. Exposure of surrounding land uses to lead from demolition activities is generally not a concern because demolition activities do not result in appreciable emissions of lead.22 The primary emitters of lead are industrial processes. Any lead- based paint utilized on the exterior and interior of the existing single-family home would generally remain inside the structure or close to the exterior of the building and would be removed during demolition. Improper disposal of lead-based paint could contaminate soil and subsurface groundwater in and under landfills not properly equipped to handle hazardous levels of this material. Due to the age of the buildings it is assumed that lead-based paint is present. Therefore, 8 CCR Section 1532.1 (California Construction Safety Orders for Lead)must be followed for the demolition of all existing structures requiring exposure assessment and compliance measures to keep worker exposure below action levels. The Project is also subject to Title 22 requirements for the disposal of solid waste contaminated with excessive levels of lead.Testing, monitoring,containment,and disposal of lead-based materials will comply with all Cal/OSHA standards and regulations under California Construction Safety Orders for Lead section 1532. Adherence to standard regulation would ensure that impacts related to the release of lead based paints would be less than significant. With regard to operation, the proposed car wash would not involve the use of hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Project operation would involve the use of solvents, cleaners, and waxes used for typical car wash operations, and with compliance with existing regulations, would not pose a significant risk to the environment or humans. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. There is a special education school located approximately 200 feet to the north of the Project site(Mulberry Early Education Center).However,as mentioned above,the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Impacts will be less than significant. 52 Initial Study Page 435 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts d) No Impact. The Project is not located on a site listed on the state Cortese List, a compilation of various sites throughout the state that have been compromised due to soil or groundwater contamination from past uses.23 Based upon review of the Cortese List,the Project site is not: ■ listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC),21 ■ listed as a leaking underground storage tank(LUFT)site by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),25 ■ listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB,26 ■ currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) as issued by the SWRCB,21 or ■ developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.28 No impact will occur in relation to hazardous materials sites. e-f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.29 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25- miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. g) Less than Significant Impact. Per state Fire and Building Codes, sufficient space will have to be provided around the buildings for emergency personnel and equipment access and emergency evacuation. All Project elements, including landscaping, would be sited with sufficient clearance from existing and proposed structures so as not to interfere with emergency access to and evacuation from the facility. The car wash will be required to comply with the California Fire Code as adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Chapter 15.04.010). The car wash site plan includes one ingress/egress access point via a 50-foot wide driveway on Arrow Route. The car wash driveway would be constructed to California Fire Code specifications and would allow emergency access and evacuation from the site. The Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan because no permanent public street or lane closures are proposed. Construction work in the street associated with the buildings would be limited to lateral utility connections would be limited to nominal potential traffic diversion. Project impacts would be less than significant. h) No Impact.The Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, as identified on the latest Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE).30 There are no wildland conditions in the urbanized area where the Project site is located. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The incremental effects of the Project related to hazards and hazardous materials, if any, are anticipated to be minimal, and any effects would be site-specific. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to hazards or hazardous materials that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future.The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to or from hazards or hazardous materials. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 53 Page 436 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.9- Hydrology and Water Quality Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,the ❑ ❑ ❑ production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ ❑ ❑ river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or ❑ ❑ ❑ amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or ❑ ❑ ❑ other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect ❑ ❑ ❑ flood flows? 54 Initial Study Page 437 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of ❑ ❑ ❑ Se a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ Se a) Less than Significant Impact.A project normally would have an impact on surface water quality if discharges associated with the project would create pollution,contamination,or nuisance as defined in Water Code§ 13050,or that cause regulatory standards to be violated as defined in the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control Plan for the receiving water body. For the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact could occur if the proposed Project would discharge water that does not meet the quality standards of the agencies that regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the Project does not comply with all applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)to reduce potential water quality impacts during construction activity(Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.190) and the implementation of post-construction best management practices (BMPs) such as detention basins, infiltration ponds, porous pavement, sand and organic filters, etc. (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.110). Construction Impacts Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3)earth-moving activities which,when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. All new development Projects equal to one acre or more are subject to San Bernardino County NPDES Permit No. CAS618036.The car wash development would disturb approximately 1.36 acres of land and therefore will be subject to NPDES permit requirements during construction activities. In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared and submitted for the proposed Project. All construction projects must apply BMPs that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes,filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion. Compliance with City discharge requirements would ensure that construction of the Project would not violate any water quality standards or discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impacts would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. Operational Impacts An Infiltration Testing Report was prepared by Christopher Krall, P.G. of RGS Engineering Geology, dated September 12, 2018 (See Appendix H). The purpose of the testing was to determine the vertical infiltration rate of stormwater infiltration for the soil below the site in order to include the appropriate storage capacity for the proposed infiltration basin. Proposed construction will increase impervious areas on the Project site as the site currently consists of mostly impervious surfaces. The approximately 1.36-acre site will be replaced with a car wash structure,vacuum area,detail center,and associated paving and landscaping. Runoff from the developed site would result in increased potential water contamination from urban pollutants that are commonly found in surface parking lots, ornamental landscape planters and from atmospheric buildup on rooftops. Runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route.The Project would Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 55 Page 438 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts be subject to post-construction BMPs to address increases in impervious surfaces, methods to decrease incremental increases in off-site stormwater flows, and methods for decreasing pollutant loading in off-site discharges. A key design criterion is to treat the first 3/4-inch rainstorm flows,since the first rains typically carry the most concentrated levels of pollution that have built up since the last storm.Common post-construction BMPs include retaining stormwater on-site to filter back into the groundwater.The car wash development would consist of approximately 15,607 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 26% of the overall site total.An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the car wash's southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping.These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment. As previously mentioned, the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. Landscaped areas and on-site storm drainage facilities will collect stormwater to be conveyed to the bio swales for treatment, and then pumped to the City storm drainage system on Arrow Route. The proposed Project would not generate hazardous wastewater that would require any special waste discharge permits. All wastewater associated with the building's interior plumbing system would be discharged into the local sewer system for treatment at the regional wastewater treatment plant. Although the amount of impervious surface would be greater than existing conditions, runoff would be captured on site and conveyed through a proposed on-site storm drainage system that includes water treatment at the site's various bio swales prior to being discharged into the municipal storm drain at Arrow Route. Impacts associated with operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. b) Less than Significant Impact. If the Project removes an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduces runoff that results in groundwater recharge such that existing wells would no longer be able to operate,a potentially significant impact could occur. As described in the Infiltration Testing Report, groundwater was encountered in both exploratory trench excavations at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. In general,groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface. Project-related grading would only go a few feet below the surface and would not reach the depth of the groundwater table. No disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed building footprint and pavement area would increase impervious surface coverage on the site, thereby reducing the total amount of infiltration onsite. However, infiltration of irrigation water through soil and water from runoff through soft-bottom channels would ensure continued groundwater recharge in Rancho Cucamonga as impervious surfaces increase. The Project site is not utilized for groundwater recharge and will include landscaped areas that would serve as infiltration.Because this site is not managed for groundwater supplies and would provide landscaped areas for continued infiltration, this change in infiltration would not have a significant effect on groundwater table level. Impacts related to development of the proposed Project would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the Project results in substantial on-or off-site erosion or siltation. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio swales and an infiltration basin for treatment and then conveyed to the City's storm drainage system in Arrow Route. Therefore, the drainage pattern would not be substantially altered in a manner that could cause increases in erosion off-site. Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be implemented during construction. At the completion of construction,the site would consist of impervious surfaces and would therefore not be prone to substantial erosion. No streams cross the Project site; thus, the Project would not alter any stream course. Impacts would be less than significant. d-e)Less than Significant Impact. No streams traverse the Project site;thus,the Project would not result in the alteration of any stream course. During construction,the Project applicant would be required to comply with drainage and runoff guidelines pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 19.20. With regard to Project operation, construction of the car wash would increase the net area of impermeable surfaces on the site;therefore, increased discharges to the City's existing storm drain system would likely occur.As shown on the Project site plans, stormwater associated with the proposed Project would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio 56 Initial Study Page 439 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts swales for treatment and then conveyed to the City's storm drainage system at Arrow Route. Permits to connect to the existing storm drainage system would be obtained prior to construction. All drainage plans are subject to City review and approval. These requirements would apply to the proposed Project.Therefore, the increase in discharges would not impact local storm drain capacity. The Project is not an industrial use and therefore would not result in substantial pollutant loading such that treatment control BMPs would be required to protect downstream water quality. In addition, as mentioned above, runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Post-construction BMP's, as described above, would ensure the Project would not result in substantial pollutant loading. Impacts related to the proposed Project Change would be less than significant. f) Less than Significant Impact.The Project does not propose any uses that could have the potential to otherwise degrade water quality beyond those issues discussed in Section 4.9 herein. Impacts would be less than significant. g&h) No Impact. According to flood maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood floodplain.31 No impact would occur. i) No Impact.According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Health and Safety Element,the Project site is not located within a dam inundation area.32 No impact would result. j) No Impact.The City is not exposed to tsunami hazards due to its inland location. In addition, no large water bodies that would pose potential for seiche are located in the Project area. The potential for mudflows is unlikely given the site's distance from hillside and mountainous terrain. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential impacts related to hydrology and storm water runoff are typically site-specific BMPs are implemented at the project level. The analysis above determined that the implementation of the Project would not result in significant impacts. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact under most hydrology criteria, and therefore could not contribute toward a cumulative impact. In regard to Project impacts that would be considered less than significant, such impacts are not expected to result in compounded or increased impacts when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects, as other projects would be subject to similar laws and requirements regarding hydrology practices. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 57 Page 440 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.10- Land Use and Planning Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local ❑ ❑ Elcoastal program,or zoning ordinance) ir adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ❑ ❑ ❑ conservation plan? Se a) No Impact. The Project is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and south, a school to the north, and residential uses to the east. The site is currently designated in the City's General Plan and Zoning Code for General Commercial uses on Parcel 1, and Low Medium Density Residential on Parcel 2. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial, bringing the entire Project site under the same General Commercial designation. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. Therefore, the Project is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. The Project does not involve construction of any roadway, flood control channel,or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the community.Therefore,no impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. Parcel 1 is designated as General Commercial in the City's General Plan and is zoned (GC) General Commercial. However, Parcel 2 is designated as Low Medium Density Residential in the General Plan, and zoned(LM)Low Medium(4-8 du/ac)residential.The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for Parcel 2 in order to make the site consistent. Section 17.34 (General Development Standards)of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides general site development standards for commercial uses. The primary purpose of the General Commercial zone is to provide for general shopping with a variety of business, retail, personal, and related or similar services.The Project does not conflict with the intent or implementation of this designation as it allows for a variety of businesses and related services, of which a car wash and detail center would be. Furthermore, the Project would maintain the integrity of the commercial areas to the west and south in terms of density, use,and design.As previously mentioned,the Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The Project does not include any feature that would circumvent any mitigating policies in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. c) No Impact.As discussed in Section 4.4.f above, the Project site is not located within any habitat conservation plan or community conservation plan. Therefore, no impact will occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project does not conflict with any existing land use regulations and therefore could not contribute towards any cumulative impacts. The Project does not propose any new roadways or other significant infrastructure improvements that would restrict 58 Initial Study Page 441 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts access or require a diversion for existing travel routes.The Project does not result in an impact on any sensitive plant or animal species covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, nor does it hinder the implementation or establishing of such plans. For these reasons, the Project would not cumulatively contribute to land use conflicts and potential impacts are considered less than cumulative considerable. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 59 Page 442 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.11 — Mineral Resources Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to ❑ ❑ ❑ the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or other land use plan? a-b) No Impact. The Project site is located in an almost completely urbanized area characterized by residential and commercial development and some vacant land.The Project site is not shown in the City's General Plan to be within an area defined by regionally significant aggregate resources and there are no mineral extractions or process facilities on or near the site.33 No mineral resources are known to exist within the vicinity. Impacts related to the proposed car wash and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to mineral resources.Therefore,the Project would not result in incremental effects to mineral resources that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Thus, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur. 60 Initial Study Page 443 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.12- Noise Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ❑ El ❑ ordinance, or applicable standards of other if agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ Se ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above ❑ ❑ ❑ levels existing without the Project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity ❑ ❑ ❑ above levels existing without the Project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the Project ❑ ❑ ❑ expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to ❑ ❑ ❑ excessive noise levels? Roadway Construction Noise Modeling was performed and is included as Appendix D. A Project Operational Noise Assessment was prepared by Jeremy Louden, Principal, of Ldn Consulting, Inc. and dated August 28, 2019. A Project Construction Noise Assessment was also prepared by Mr. Louden, and is dated January 7, 2019. These reports are included as Appendix E, Noise Analyses.34 35 Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. Sound (and therefore noise) consists of energy waves that people receive and interpret. Sound pressure levels are described in logarithmic units of ratios of sound pressures to a reference pressure, squared. These units are called bels. In order to provide a finer description of sound, a bel is subdivided into ten decibels, abbreviated dB.To account for the range of sound that human hearing perceives, a modified scale is utilized known as the A- weighted decibel(dBA).Since decibels are logarithmic units,sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by ordinary arithmetic means. For example, if one automobile produces a sound pressure level of 70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dBA. In fact, they would combine to produce 73 dBA. This same principle can be applied to other traffic quantities as well. In other words, doubling the traffic volume on a street or the speed Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 61 Page 444 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of the traffic will increase the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. Conversely, halving the traffic volume or speed will reduce the traffic noise level by 3 dBA.A 3 dBA change in sound is the beginning at which humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound and a 5 dBA change is generally readily perceptible.36 Noise consists of pitch, loudness, and duration; therefore, a variety of methods for measuring noise have been developed. According to the California General Plan Guidelines for Noise Elements, the following are common metrics for measuring noise:37 LEQ(Equivalent Energy Noise Level):The sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over given sample periods. LEQ is typically computed over 1-, 8-, and 24-hour sample periods. CNEL(Community Noise Equivalent Level):The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day,obtained after addition of five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:OOpm to 10:OOpm and after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night from 10:OOpm to 7:OOam. LuN (Day-Night Average Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after the addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:OOpm and before 7:OOam. CNEL and LDN are utilized for describing ambient noise levels because they account for all noise sources over an extended period of time and account for the heightened sensitivity of people to noise during the night. LEQ is better utilized for describing specific and consistent sources because of the shorter reference period. City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code The City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, under Section 17.66.050—Noise Standards, provides the local government ordinance relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Operational Noise Standards Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. Construction Noise Restrictions To control noise associated with the construction of the proposed Project the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established permitted hours of operation and noise level limits.According to Section 17.66.050(D)(4)(a)of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code the following activities are exempt from the provisions of the noise standards: • When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church or similar type of use,the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided that noise levels created do not exceed the base noise level standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line. • When adjacent to a commercial or industrial use,the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday and Sunday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the standards of 70 dBA at the adjacent property line. Based on the nearby residential and school uses, the permitted hours of construction activity at the Project site shall be between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. In addition, the noise level standard of 65 dBA Leq shall apply to noise levels generated by Project construction at the nearby 62 Initial Study Page 445 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts land uses. If the Project demonstrates compliance with these standards, the construction noise level impacts are considered exempt from the noise standards. Existing Noise Environment Noise level measurements were conducted by Ldn Consulting between the hours of 12:00 p.m.and 1:30 p.m.on May 9,2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on "slow" response and "A- weighting." The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 12, Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements, provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Appendix E. Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements Noise Level dBA ID Location Description Leg Lmin Lmax 1 Central of site at northern property line—set back from roadways. 63.4 37.1 90.8 Source:Ldn Consulting,Inc.Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment.August 28,2019. a, c, d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.66.050) sets allowable levels for residential and commercial land uses. Exterior noise exposure for residential use is allowable up to 60 dBA and for commercial uses is allowable up to 65 dBA. Construction Noise Levels As previously mentioned, short-term construction noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc. and presented in a Noise study dated January 7, 2018. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a rubber tire dozer, a backhoe, power tools, concrete mixers and paving machine that can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur from grading, building construction, and paving activities. This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken at similar sites and construction activities to describe the typical construction noise levels for each stage of Project construction. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 65 dBA Leq to in excess of 80 dBA Leq when measured at 50 feet. However,these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA Leq per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA Leq measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receiver and would be further reduced to 68 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the source to the receiver. According to the project's contractor, grading of the project will occur all in a single phase using a single rubber-tired dozer. No water truck will be required due to the size of the sight,access to a water supply line and the fact that the grading operations will only occur for 2-3 weeks. Trenching and underground earthwork will be completed using a single backhoe. Building construction will consist of concrete trucks and paving activities will utilize a paving machine. To determine the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Table 13, Construction Reference Noise Levels, provides a summary of the construction reference noise level measurements. Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels Reference Reference Noise Reference Noise Distance from Levels @ 50 Feet Levels @ 100 Feet Noise Source Source(Feet) dBA Leq) dBA Le )5 Grading Activities' 50 73.5 67.5 Foundation Trenchin z 50 68.2 62.2 Building Construction3 50 67.2 61.2 Paving Activities4 50 70.4 64.4 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 9/3/15 at a construction site located in the Ramona. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 63 Page 446 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 2 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 6/20/16 at a construction site located in Corona. 3 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 4/10/18 at a commercial construction site located in San Jacinto. ^As measured by Ldn Consulting on 10/30/18 during roadway construction in San Diego. 5 Reference noise levels are calculated at 100 feet using a drop off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. The dozer will be moving along the property line and then moving away from the property line as needed to complete the finished site elevations.Therefore,the dozer would be adjacent to property line for only a short period of time and then moving away from that same location by at least 100-150 feet, in a loop or sweeping motion. The acoustical center of the activities, on an hourly basis,would be in between those two distances from the property line.An example of how the dozer would move around the site is provided in Figure 2 of the Construction Noise Assessment. Trenching, building construction and paving activities will also move around the site. Typically, the equipment will be more than 50 feet from the nearest sensitive receptors.To be conservative,and average distance of 50 feet was used to determine potential impacts. Utilizing the noise levels from Table 13 above, at an average distance of 50 feet, the construction noise levels from each phase would exceed the City's 65 dBA hourly threshold. Table 14, Construction Noise Level Reductions Required, summarizes the maximum noise levels at each of the studied receivers.Therefore, inclusion of Mitigation Measure N01-1 is required to reduce temporary construction noise impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measure N01-1 requires installation of temporary noise attenuation barriers will be installed along the northern and eastern property lines during the grading operations. It is recommended that the temporary barriers stay in place until all construction activities are completed. In addition,Mitigation Measure NOW includes requirements for construction hours,combustion-engine equipment,equipment staging areas, equipment idling, loading and unloading of materials, public communication.These measures are discussed in more detail below Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Require Reference Noise Noise Reduction Levels @ 50 Feet Needed to Achieve Resultant Noise Noise Source dBA Le 65 Decibels dBA ' Levels dBA Grading Activities' 73.5 -8.5 65 Foundation Trenchin 2 68.2 -3.2 65 Building Construction 67.2 -2.2 65 Paving Activities4 70.4 -5.4 65 'Temporary noise barrier needed to achieve additional reductions. Construction Noise Mitigation The Fresnel Diffraction Method was utilized for determining the relative noise reduction associated with a temporary wooden noise attenuation wall. The proposed noise attenuation wall would need to be 6-foot high and located at the property line to break the line of sight from the equipment at the adjacent property.The attenuation wall would reduce mid octave-band (250- Hz and 500-Hz) sound levels associated with typical construction activities between 8.5 dB and 10.1 dB. The reduction is dependent upon the source elevation and the topography between the source and receptor. The effective mitigated sound level at the nearest occupied residential area is therefore anticipated to be at or below 65 decibels (73.5 dB minus 8.5 dB) with the incorporation of the 6-foot high temporary noise attenuation barrier. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with inclusion of the temporary noise attenuation barrier and no further mitigation is required for the proposed grading activities. Mitigation Measures NOW: The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction: • Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines.Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, hay bales,or any other suitable material such that a minimum reduction 64 Initial Study Page 447 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of 8.5 dBA is achieved at the nearest sensitive land use. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays,with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site(i.e., to the center)during construction. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines(i.e., in excess of 5 minutes)will be prohibited. • The Project will designate a "construction liaison" that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site. • If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Operational Noise levels Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM.As previously mentioned, long-term operational noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc., and presented in a Noise study dated August 28, 2019.A substantial increase in ambient noise is an increase that is barely perceptible (3 dBA). The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles along the eastern edge of Parcel 2. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system. The car wash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north.The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3 of the Operational Noise Assessment.The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The modeling includes a 6-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. Rooftop mechanical ventilation units(HVAC)will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA (See Appendix E). Receptors used in the noise modeling (Figure 4 of the Noise Study) do not represent actual noise sensitive land uses.The receptor locations that were chosen for the analysis are located on the Project site and are for noise modeling purposes only. However, these receptor locations are located closer to the Project site than actual existing noise sensitive receptors located at the residential uses to the east and the elementary school to the north. Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SoundPLAN Essential,version 4.1,a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package(NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 65 Page 448 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Standard 9613-2, "Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation." The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data.The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impacts, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time due to the fact that wind patterns fluctuate.Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver.Acoustically hard sites include surfaces,such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off-site uses are considered acoustically soft,or absorptive,therefore,an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. Elevations were taken from the project plans. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 15, Operational Reference Noise Levels(dBA), below. Table 15 0 erational Reference Noise Levels dBA Noise Source Number of Sources Reference Sound Power Level' Car Wash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 4 80.0 ' Reference Noise Level provided in Operational Noise Assessment Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific modeled receptor locations are shown in Table 16, Operational Noise Levels (dBA), below. The results of the noise modeling along with the modeled receptor locations are shown in Figure 4 of the Operational Noise Analysis.As shown in Table 16,noise levels would not exceed the City's standard of 65 dBA at the modeled receptor locations with incorporation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Because the nearest sensitive receptors are located further away than the modeled receptor locations, noise levels would be even lower at these locations due to distance attenuation. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at nearby sensitive land uses. Table 16 Operational Noise Levels dBA Modeled Receptor With Mitigation Location Measures R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 *Noise levels are hourly averages Lq Mitigation Measures N01-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5)feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight(8)feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. 66 Initial Study Page 449 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts b) Less than Significant Impact. Vibration is the movement of mass over time. It is described in terms of frequency and amplitude and unlike sound; there is no standard way of measuring and reporting amplitude. Vibration can be described in units of velocity(inches per second)or discussed in decibel (dB) units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration.Vibration impacts to buildings are generally discussed in terms of peak particle velocity(PPV)that describes particle movement over time (in terms of physical displacement of mass). For purposes of this analysis, PPV will be used to describe all vibration for ease of reading and comparison.Vibration can impact people, structures,and sensitive equipment.38 The primary concern related to vibration and people is the potential to annoy those working and residing in the area.Vibration with high enough amplitudes can damage structures (such as crack plaster or destroy windows). Groundborne vibration can also disrupt the use of sensitive medical and scientific instruments such as electron microscopes.Common sources of vibration within communities include construction activities and railroads. Operation of the Project does not include uses that cause vibration. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack hammering, and demolition-related activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration impacts if large bulldozers, large trucks, or other heavy equipment are used. The construction of the car wash would not require the use of equipment such as pile drivers, which are known to generate substantial construction vibration levels. According to the Caltrans vibration manual, large bulldozers, vibratory rollers (used to compact earth), and loaded trucks utilized during grading activities can produce vibration, and depending on the level of vibration, could cause annoyance at uses within the Project vicinity or damage structures. Caltrans has developed a screening tool to determine of vibration from construction equipment is substantial enough to impact surrounding uses. The Caltrans vibration manual establishes thresholds for vibration impacts on buildings and humans.These thresholds are summarized in Tables 17, Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria, and Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria. Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria Structural Integrity Maximum PPV(in/sec) Transient Continuous Historic and some older buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modern industrial and commercial structures 2.00 0.50 Source:Caltrans 2013 Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria Human Response PPV Threshold (in/sec) Transient Continuous Barely perceptible 0.035 0.012 Distinctly perceptible 0.24 0.035 Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10 Severely perceptible 2.00 0.40 Source:Caltrans 2013 Construction of the car wash would not require rock blasting, or pile driving, but could require use a vibratory roller, small bulldozer, loaded trucks, and jackhammer. Construction activities that use vibratory rollers and bulldozers are repetitive sources of vibration;therefore,the continuous threshold is used. Commercial and residential uses adjacent to the Project site are located to the north and east, respectively. As a worst-case scenario, the historic and some older buildings threshold is used. Based on the threshold criteria summarized in Tables 17 and 18, vibration from use of heavy construction equipment for the Project would be below the thresholds to cause damage to nearby structures at the receptors shown in Table 19, Construction Vibration Impacts. This includes the Beverly Hills House, which will not be directly or indirectly impacted by Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 67 Page 450 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts construction vibration. With regard to long-term operational impacts, activities associated with the car wash would not result in any excessive vibration-related impacts to adjacent or on-site properties. All of the receptors will experience barely perceptible vibration from the use of this equipment (See Appendix F, Vibration Calculations). Furthermore, pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,these construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM.Therefore, the Project would not result in excessive, strongly perceptible vibration. Impacts will be less than significant. Table 19 Construction Vibration Im acts Distance Receptors Equipment PPVref (feet)* PPV 1 —Single-Family Residence E Vibratory Roller 0.21 82 0.0448 2— Mulberry Ed. Center N Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 0.0136 1 —Single-Family Residence E Large Bulldozer 0.089 82 0.0190 2— Mulberry Ed. Center N Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 0.0058 1 —Single-Family Residence E Small Bulldozer 0.003 82 0.0006 2— Mulberry Ed. Center N Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 0.0002 1 —Single-Family Residence E Loaded Truck 0.076 82 0.0162 2— Mulberry Ed. Center N Loaded Truck 0.076 1 205 1 0.0049 1 —Single-Family Residence E) Jackhammer 0.035 82 0.0075 2— Mulberry Ed. Center N Jackhammer 0.035 205 0.0023 Source:MIG 2018.See Appendix E. *Actual distance from center of Project site to receptor. e,f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.39 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25-miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative noise impacts would occur primarily as a result of increased traffic on local roadways due to buildout of the Project and other projects in the vicinity.A project's contribution to a cumulative traffic noise increase would be considered significant when the combined effect exceeds perception level threshold. The combined effect compares the "cumulative with Project" condition to existing conditions.Although there may be a significant noise increase due to the Project in combination with other related projects(combined effects), it must also be demonstrated that the Project has an incremental effect. In other words, a significant portion of the noise increase must be due to the Project.The following criteria were utilized to evaluate the combined effect of the cumulative noise increase. • Combined Effect. The cumulative with Project noise level"Future With Project"would cause a significant cumulative impact if a 3.0 dB increase over existing condition occurs AND the resulting noise level exceeds the applicable exterior standard at a sensitive use. • Incremental Effect. The "Future With Project" causes a 1.0 dBA increase in noise over the "Future Without Project" noise level. • A significant impact would result only if both the combined and incremental effects criteria have been exceeded. As discussed in Section 4.12.a. above, the proposed Project would not exceed the applicable City exterior noise standard at nearby sensitive uses. Therefore, none of the roadway segments would exceed both the Combined Effect and Incremental Effect criteria because the Combined Effect criteria requires a project to result in noise levels that exceed the applicable exterior noise standard. Therefore, the Project in combination with cumulative background traffic noise levels would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. 68 Initial Study Page 451 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.13- Population and Housing Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses)or ❑ ❑ ❑ indirectly(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? a) No Impact. The Project would employ between three and six employees and would not induce population growth. No new expanded infrastructure is proposed that could accommodate additional growth in the area that is not already possible with existing infrastructure. No impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact.The Project site consists of two parcels:one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home.The single-family residence is currently used as a rental property and would be demolished in order to develop the car wash.There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of residential units necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Displacement, in the context of housing, can generally be defined as persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence.40 There is a single- family home located on the site that is currently used as a rental property by one family. There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to population or housing. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to population and housing that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. As a result, no cumulative impacts related to population and housing would occur. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 69 Page 452 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.14- Public Services Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Se d) Parks? El El El Se e) Other public facilities? El El Se El a) Less than Significant Impact.The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD)provides fire protection services for the City. The RCFPD employs over 120 full time and part time employees that serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50 square mile area. Fire,rescue,emergency medical and hazardous materials incidents are coordinated by an on-duty Battalion Chief supervising cross-trained firefighter/paramedics and firefighter/emergency medical technicians(EMTs) responding from seven fire stations. The RCFPD located closest to the Project site is Fire Station 172, located approximately 0.65 miles north of the Project site at 9612 San Bernardino Road. Development of the car wash as proposed by the Project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services. However, development would not increase to a substantial level considering the site's location and surrounding area of similar uses,and incremental impacts would be offset with payment of Development Impact Fees. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Police protection services would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department. The closest sheriff's station is located at 10510 Civic Center Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 1.00 miles east of the Project site.Although a new car wash development would be constructed and operated on the Project site, the Project is in a currently developed area currently served by the County Sheriff's Department. The Project is not anticipated to increase response times to the Project site or surrounding area.As required for a development of this type,the Project is subject to a law enforcement Development Impact Fee as imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project does not propose or require new or physically altered police protection facilities.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) No Impact.The Project is a non-residential land use.The Cucamonga School District will require development impact fees be paid by the applicant. With payment of the required fees, no significant impact to school services or facilities would occur and no mitigation is required. d) No Impact. The City has established park impact fees to offset the costs associated with increased maintenance and the addition of park facilities resulting from new development. The City's park impact fees are generated based on the number of residential units in either subdivision or non-subdivision developments. The Project includes development of a car wash and 70 Initial Study Page 453 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts does not have a residential component.As such,the Project would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. Therefore,the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. e) Less than Significant Impact. The City requires that certain types of development pay impact fees to compensate for additional services provided by public facilities as a result of implementation of their project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires development impact fees for libraries and animal centers; however,the Project would not be subject to these impact fees as they are based on the number of residential units proposed by the development. The Project does not include residential uses and would not result in a direct increase in population within the City or surrounding area. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities would occur with Project implementation and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in a significant impact to any public services or facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to public services or facilities that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to public services or facilities. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 71 Page 454 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.15— Recreation Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an ❑ ❑ ❑ adverse physical effect on the environment? a) No Impact.The Project does not include development of any residences that could directly generate increased demand for parks and recreational facilities. Implementation of the Project would not generate an increase in demand on existing public or private parks or other recreational facilities that would either result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. Furthermore,as the Project does not include residential uses,the Project would not be subject to a park impact fee.Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. b) No Impact. As previously addressed, the Project does not include residential development and would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities.The Project does not include recreational facilities, nor would it require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in an increased use of recreational facilities or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities.Therefore, no cumulative impacts on recreational facilities would result from Project implementation. 72 Initial Study Page 455 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.16— Transportation and Traffic Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards ❑ ❑ ❑ established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible ❑ ❑ ❑ uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease ❑ ❑ /� ❑ the performance or safety of such facilities? a) No Determination. A traffic impact study was prepared for the Project by Trames Solutions, dated March 20, 2019 (See Appendix G)41 According to the traffic impact study, the Project is estimated to generate 909 additional daily trips, with 50 AM peak hour trips and 89 PM peak hour trips. Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed Project,no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed Project. However, the following intersection improvements were recommended to address cumulative impacts during the peak hours: Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 73 Page 456 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts • Archibald/Arrow Route-Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an unacceptable level of service during the peak hour.Since the project does not directly cause a significant impact at this location,the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis.Furthermore,the development on the northeast corner(DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald)— Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash —8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width. • Malvern/Arrow Route - Install a channelized median at the intersection of Malven Avenue/Arrow Route to restrict northbound left turns. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $5,000. Since the project does not directly cause the need for this improvement,the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The traffic Study area was established in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff through the Scoping Letter Agreement process.The traffic study area includes four intersections as listed below: 1. Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route 2. Malven Avenue/Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Avenue/Arrow Route 4. West Project Driveway(Car Wash)/Arrow Route 5. East Project Driveway(Car Wash)/Arrow Route Morning and evening peak hour traffic conditions were analyzed for the following scenarios: • Existing(2018)Traffic • Opening Day+Ambient+Cumulative(ODAC 2019) • Opening Day+Ambient+Cumulative+Project(ODACP 2019) • Horizon Year(2040)Without Project • Horizon Year(2040)With Project Future traffic analysis is based on a background (ambient)growth of 2% per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service (LOS) as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate LOS conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway.The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine LOS. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections,the calculation of LOS is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the LOS has been calculated. 74 Initial Study Page 457 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street.The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. The LOS are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE LEVEL OF SECONDS SERVICE SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and u Significance Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established LOS "D" as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS "E" or "F" is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. However, pursuant to recent CEQA court case rulings, LOS is no longer considered a significant impact. As such, no impact determination has been made, and the findings of the LOS based traffic impact study prepared by Trames Solutions have been included in this section of the Initial Study Checklist for informational purposes. Existing Conditions(2018)Delay and Level of Service As shown in Table 20, Existing(2018) Conditions,the study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level of service(LOS"D"or betted)during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls. Table 20 Existing 2018 Conditions Traffic Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service Intersection Signal AM PM AM PM 1.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 51.9 54.7 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 28.0 24.3 D C 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 37.4 27.5 D D 4. Project Driveway/Arrow Route -- -- -- -- -- Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2019 TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination.Therefore,to account for these trips(termed "ambient growth"), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. To account for traffic not attributed to the project or Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 75 Page 458 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts other planned developments within the study area, linear growth between 2018 traffic volumes and San Bernardino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM)2040 forecast has been utilized to estimate ambient growth for opening year(2019) conditions. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development.The land use category for an automated car wash facility(7,293 sf)with a 140-foot long car wash tunnel was used.The number of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual.The latest version(10t"edition)only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation for a car wash facility. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta(Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.)to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility.Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the number of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased.Therefore,the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 of the Traffic Study were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the Project are shown in Table 21, Project Trip Generation Summary. The proposed Project is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37%, PM-35%)and a 5% internal trip reduction (with the adjacent gas station)was assumed for the car wash. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash(17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale,CA). Project Tnp Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The Project's trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the Project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution patterns for the Project are illustrated on Figures 4-A and 4- B of the Project Traffic Study. Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary Peak Hour AM PM Land Use Quantity In Out I Total In Out Total Dail Express Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction(AM-37%:PM-35%)' -- -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction(5%) -- -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 Car Wash Subtotal 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 Total Project Trips 29 21 50 40 48 89 909 Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2018 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash. 1711 Hawthorne Blvd.,Lawndale, CA TSF=thousand square feet Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination.Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project.A 5% reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale,CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37%and 35%were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 76 Initial Study Page 459 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Cumulative Traffic Trip Generation To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus Project traffic conditions, Project traffic was combined with existing traffic,area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments that are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff.The location of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study.According to the Project Traffic Study, cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions,project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. Other Approved or Proposed Development Project The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study and include the following projects: • DRC 20118-000119(9000 Hellman Ave.)—174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse • DRC 2013-00565(NE of Archibald/7th)—171,941 General Industrial • DRC 2017-00654(SW of Haven/26th)—207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail • DRC 2016-00695(8th/Industrial)—150,003 sf General Industrial • DRC 2015-00682(8477 Archibald)—Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash—8 Fueling Positions OtherApproved Project Trip Generation The cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. OtherApproved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-E through 4-1 contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative(ODAC 2019)Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative(ODAC 2019)conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 22, Opening day(2019)Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Conditions, below.As shown on Table 22,the study area intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service(LOS"D"or better)during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls,except for the intersection of Archibald Ave./Arrow Route(#1).However,the improvement of widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service(LOS"D"or better). Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative ODAC 2019 Conditions Traffic Delay(Seconds)2 Level of Service Intersection Signal' AM PM AM PM 1.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 55.9 62.7 E E -With Improvements TS 53.7 51.3 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 30.6 26.3 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 38.0 28.6 D C Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 77 Page 460 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.W. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 13.7 13.4 B B 5. E. Project Driveway/Arrow Route Future Intersection Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project(ODACP 2019)Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project(ODACP 2019)conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 23, Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project(ODACP 2019)Conditions,below.As shown on Table 23, most study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS"D"or better)during peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route(#1)will continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service with existing geometry. However, the same improvement measure under ODAC conditions (widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing)is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service(LOS"D"or better). Table 23 Opening Da 2019 Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Traffic Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service Intersection Signal' AM PM AM PM 1.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 57.7 65.9 E E -With Improvements TS 54.5 54.3 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 32.8 29.0 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 41.3 38.8 D D 4.W. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 14.6 15.1 B C 5. E. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 14.0 13.6 B B Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2018 TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year(2040) Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year(2040)Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 24,Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions, below.As shown on Table 24, the following study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service(LOS"E"or worse)during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls: • Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route(#1) • Malven Avenue/Arrow Route(#2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route(#1),the separate westbound right turn with overlap phasing improvement identified under ODAC conditions is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS "D"or better). For the intersection of Malven Avenue/Arrow Route(#2), restricting the northbound approach to right turns only is anticipated to improve the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service(LOS"D"or better). However,this improvement will shift the northbound traffic heading west on Arrow to instead,turn right and make a U-turn at Ramona Avenue.The peak hour operations at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route have been evaluated for 2040 conditions and are presented in Table 24. It should be noted however that the intersection of Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E"or worse)during the peak hours even without and with the shifted northbound left turn volumes from 78 Initial Study Page 461 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Malven Avenue. As shown in Table 24, restricting northbound left turns at Malven Avenue/Arrow Route (#2) and northbound/southbound left turns at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route (#3) during peak hours are anticipated improve both intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 24 Horizon Year 2040 Without Project Conditions Traffic Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service Intersection Signal' AM PM AM PM 1.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 70.3 56.8 E E -With Improvements TS 54.2 53.6 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 53.8 35.2 F E -Without NB left turn during peak hours CSS 17.6 17.1 C C 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 46.6 45.5 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 15.2 13.9 C B 5. E. Project Driveway/Arrow Route Future Intersection 6. Ramona Ave./Arrow Route CSS >100 >100 F F -Without NB/SB left turns duringpeak hours CSS 15.8 16.1 C C Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year(2040) With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year(2040)With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 25, Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions,below.As shown on Table 25,the Project Driveway/Arrow Route(#4)intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS"E"or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. As shown in Table 25, the improvements identified previously under Horizon Year(2040)Without Project conditions are anticipated to improve the deficient intersections to operate at an acceptable level of(LOS"D"or better). Table 25 Horizon Year 2040 With Project Conditions Traffic Delay(Seconds)2 Level of Service Intersection Signal' AM PM AM PM 1.Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 72.5 58.9 E E -With Improvements TS 54.4 54.8 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 60.4 40.4 F E -Without NB left during peak hours CSS 18.1 17.7 C C 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 46.7 45.8 D D 4.W. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 16.3 15.7 C C 5. E. Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 15.0 14.3 B B -With Improvements CSS 1 15.7 1 14.6 1 C B 6. Ramona Ave./Arrow Route CSS >100 >100 F F -Without NB/SB left turns during peak hours CSS 16.1 16.5 C C Source:Trames Solutions,Inc.,2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 79 Page 462 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Findings For Existing (2018) conditions the study area intersections are operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS "D"or better) during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls. For ODAC (2019)and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route(#1) is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service(LOS"E"or worse)during the peak hours. Providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year(2040)Without Project conditions,the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route(#1)and Malven Avenue /Arrow Route(#2)are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service(LOS"E"or worse)during the peak hours. For the intersection of Archibald Avenue /Arrow Route (#1), providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For the intersection of Malven Avenue/Arrow Route(#2),restricting the northbound approach to right turns only during the peak hours is anticipated to improve the intersection to acceptable LOS.This improvement will in turn affect Ramona Avenue at Arrow Route,and in order to mitigate the secondary effects,the same treatment will be required to be installed during the peak hours at the intersection of Ramona Avenue and Arrow Route. Because LOS is no longer considered a significant impact pursuant to CEQA,the Project is not required to incorporate mitigation measures that would alleviate the above-described impacts. The Project traffic impact study provides the following recommendations,again provided for informational purposes only: Recommendations 1. On-Site. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes.The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below: • Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. • Provide signage to restrict access to right turns in/out only to/from the project driveways. • On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. • Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. 2. Off-Site.The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below: • Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue /Arrow Route with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level of service during the peak hours.However,this location is projected to operate deficiently under ODAC and 2040 without and with project conditions. The improvements will be conditioned to be constructed by the project. Furthermore, the development on the northeast corner(DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) — Gas Station/CStore/ Car Wash —8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width. • Install signs to restrict northbound left turns left turns during peak hours at both Malven Avenue and Ramona Avenue along Arrow Route during peak hours(7:00—9:00 AM and 4:00—6:00 PM).This impact will only be present for 2040 conditions and the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately$500 per location.The project fair share percentages are as follows: 80 Initial Study Page 463 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Malven Ave./Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 49 84 Existing Traffic 2,148 2,309 2040 Traffic 2,654 2,787 New Traffic 506 478 Project Percentage 9.7% 491506 17.6% 841478 Dollar Amount $88 Ramona Ave./Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 54 79 Existing Traffic 2,171 2,280 2040 Traffic 2,621 2,770 New Traffic 450 490 Project Percentage 12.0% 541450 16.1% 791490 Dollar Amount $81 Total for Project $169 b) Less than Significant Impact.The Project could result insignificant impacts if it conflicts with the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program(CMP)through reducing the Level of Service of a non-exempt segment to fall to"F". If LOS for a non-exempt segment is reduced to "F", a deficiency plan outlining specific mitigation measure and a schedule for mitigating the deficiency will be required. The nearest affected CMP designated arterials within the Project vicinity are Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue.As shown above,the Project will not reduce the Level of Service for a non-exempt CMP segment to LOS "F". While the Project will add new vehicle trips to the local roadway system, impacts to CMP designated roadways would be less than significant. Impacts to CMP designated freeways will be less than significant. c) No Impact. A significant impact would occur if the Project caused a change in air traffic patterns that would result in a substantial safety risk. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan and does not include any structures that would change air traffic patterns or uses that would generate air traffic. Therefore, no impacts related to a change in air traffic patterns would occur. d) Less than Significant Impact.A significant impact would occur if the Project substantially increased an existing hazardous design feature or introduced incompatible uses to the existing traffic pattern.Access to the Project site is proposed via a 50-foot shared driveway on Arrow Route. The design of the Project would comply with all applicable City regulations. Furthermore,the Project does not involve changes in the alignment of Arrow Route, other than to widen the westbound right-turn lane, and the proposed car wash is consistent with existing commercial uses adjacent to the Project site on the west and south. The Project would not result in a traffic safety hazard due to any design features. No impact would occur. e) Less than Significant Impact.A significant impact would occur if the design of the Project would not satisfy emergency access requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or in any other way threaten the ability of emergency vehicles to access and serve the Project site or adjacent uses.The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access.As discussed above, access to the Project site is proposed via a shared driveway on Arrow Route. The driveway width, 50 feet, is sufficient to provide access to fire and emergency vehicles and is consistent with the California Fire Code requiring a minimum of 20 feet.All access features are subject to and must satisfy the City of Rancho Cucamonga design requirements,including the Fire Department's requirements.The Project would result in less than significant impacts with regard to emergency access. f) Less than Significant Impact. Public bus transit service in the Project vicinity is currently provided by the OmniTrans Route 66. Route 66 stops along a route to include the following stops: Montclair Plaza, Central & Foothill, Upland High School, San Antonio Hospital, Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Victoria Gardens, Juniper and Foothill, and Fontana Metrolink Transit Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 81 Page 464 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Center.42 Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will also not be affected by the proposed Project.The Project would not conflict with or decrease the performance or safety of these services. Impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The traffic study addresses both the Project-specific and the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts.The Project would have a significant impact to the intersections of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route during Horizon Year(2040)conditions. However, this impact would occur without development of the Project and mitigation is not feasible given existing geometry and traffic conditions.Therefore, impacts from the Project are considered less than significant and no cumulatively considerable impact will occur. 82 Initial Study Page 465 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.17- Tribal Cultural Resources Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a Cultural Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in ❑ se ❑ ❑ Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c)of ❑ Se ❑ ❑ Public Resource Code Section 5024.1,the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. a-b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.Assembly Bill(AB)52 specifies that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change to a defined Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) may result in a significant effect on the environment.AB 52 requires tribes interested in development Projects within a traditionally and culturally affiliated geographic area to notify a lead agency of such interest and to request notification of future Projects subject to CEQA prior to determining if a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. The lead agency is then required to notify the tribe within 14 days of deeming a development application subject to CEQA complete to notify the requesting tribe as an invitation to consult on the Project.AB 52 identifies examples of mitigation measures that will avoid or minimize impacts to TCR.The bill makes the above provisions applicable to Projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative declaration circulated on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 amends Sections 5097.94 and adds Sections 21073,21074,2108.3.1.,21080.3.2,21082.3,21083.09,21084.2,and 21084.3 to the California Public Resources Code (PRC), relating to Native Americans. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As part of the findings process, the City sent an email to the NAHC requesting a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within San Bernardino County.A response from the NAHC was received on September 7, 2018. The following tribes were listed by the NAHC as having traditional lands or cultural places within the County:Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and Serrano Nation of Mission Indians. Further, MIG sent a request to the NAHC on September 26, 2018 to search their SLF to ascertain whether their files contained any new information relating to the presence of Native American cultural resources within the Project area generally and on the Project site specifically. A response letter was received indicating the absence of documentation of tribal resources in the Project area or on the Project site. However, in accordance with Assembly Bill 52(AB 52),which added various provisions to the California Public Resources Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 83 Page 466 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Code(PRC)that concern Tribal Cultural Resources, including Section 21080.3.1(d),the City contacted local tribes requesting to be notified of Projects. Responses were received from three local tribes:the Morongo Band of Mission Indians(MBMI),The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI), and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (BBMIKN). The Morongo Band of Mission Indians had no information to provide and did not request formal consultation or mitigation.The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4and SMBMI-5 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. As such, Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4 and SMBMI-5 have been incorporated herein. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources and Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains.These measures are incorporated into the Cultural Resources section of this document. In addition, Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-4 are incorporated herein to further address potential impacts related to TCR's encountered during Project implementation. Mitigation Measure TCR-1 requires that a qualified tribal representative conduct tribal cultural resources sensitivity training for construction personnel. Mitigation Measure TCR-2 requires that a qualified Native American monitor be present during all construction excavations into non-fill sediments. If tribal cultural resources are encountered, Mitigation Measure TCR-3 requires that all ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the find and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established around the find until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure TCR-4 requires that the Native American monitor prepare a final report at the conclusion of monitoring activities.With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 through SMBMI-5, GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-8,and TCR- 1 through TCR-4, impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant,as defined by CEQA(as amended,2015),a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two(2)feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural 84 Initial Study Page 467 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts resources will be required.The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor,who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist,who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated.A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s)and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant,the South Central Costal Information Center,the City,and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures.The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any,evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation the Project would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since projects would be subject to individual project-level environmental review. Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect tribal cultural resources and prevent significant impact to such resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 85 Page 468 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.18— Utilities and Service Systems Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality ❑ ❑ ❑ Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which ❑ ❑ ❑ could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded ❑ ❑ ❑ entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project's Projected ❑ ❑ ❑ demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the ❑ ❑ ❑ Project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could affect Regional Water Quality Control Board treatment standards by increasing wastewater production such that expansion of existing facilities or construction of new facilities would be required. Exceeding the RWQCB treatment standards could result in contamination of surface or groundwater with pollutants such as pathogens and nitrates. New development in the City is required to install wastewater infrastructure concurrent with Project development.Wastewater conveyance is handled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Wastewater is processed by CVWD and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). CVWD is one of eight member agencies that operate under the IEUA. IEUA operates 5 interconnected regional water-recycling facilities that treat approximately 60 million gallons per day (mgd) and have a combined permitted capacity of 84.4 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409). Two of the five IEUA 86 Initial Study Page 469 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts treatment plants serve development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4). At all IEUA treatment plants, wastewater is subject to tertiary-level water treatment, which produces effluent suitable for reuse (e.g. irrigation, wetlands/wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge). Per the General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report(2010), the treatment plant RP-1 currently has an average excess capacity of approximately 9 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409)and the portion of the City served by RP-1 (the western half and southern third) are the more developed areas of the City; therefore, additional development and redevelopment sufficient to exceed the remaining capacity of RP-1 is not anticipated.Wastewater generation more than RP- 1's capacity,though considered unlikely,would be diverted to RP-4. RP-4 provides a current excess capacity of 7.9 mgd and a potential excess capacity of 21.9 mgd.43 All wastewater generated by the interior plumbing system of the car wash would be discharged into the local sewer main and conveyed for treatment at one of the above facilities. Wastewater flows associated with the car wash would consist of the same kinds of substances typically generated by commercial uses and no modifications to any existing wastewater treatment systems or construction of any new ones would be needed to treat this Project's wastewater.Water use for the car wash was conservatively estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle based on estimates provided by the Applicant. The number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually,total water demand for the car wash is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year(10,500 gpd). Outdoor water use for landscaping is estimated at 420,480 gallons per year(1,152 gpd),for a total water use of 2,336,730 gallons per year(6,402 gpd).Wastewater is typically estimated to be 80 percent of total water use. Therefore, estimated wastewater generation from interior demand and outdoor irrigation demand for the proposed car wash development is 1,869,530(5,122 gpd).This volume is within the remaining capacity of the CVWD's 21.9 mgd total treatment capacity. This Project would thus have a less-than-significant impact on the ability of the CVWD to operate within its established wastewater treatment requirements,which are enforced via the facility's NPDES permit authorized by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board(SARWQCB).Therefore,the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to wastewater treatment requirements of the SARWQCB. b) Less than Significant Impact.The Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD)would supply water to the Project. CVWD's drinking water comes from two primary sources: local groundwater and imported water. CVWD manages its supply and demand with careful analysis regarding customer need and population estimates to ensure there will be an adequate supply of clean, reliable water into the future. CVWD, like most other agencies, creates a Water Supply Master Plan every few years that helps guide our operations and water supply investments.CVWD has a diverse water supply portfolio that helps decrease its dependence on imported water. Finding new sources of water is critical to ensuring water supply reliability for CVWD's customers. CVWD has been building a network of wells to take advantage of local groundwater supplies. The District's diversified supply ensures a reliable water supply during times of drought, regulatory constraints and other emergencies. CVWD maintains 34 reservoirs with a total capacity to store 95 million gallons of water in our service area. Water Code § 10910-10915 require the preparation of a water supply assessment (WSA) demonstrating sufficient water supplies for any subdivision that involves the construction of more than 500 dwelling units, or the equivalent thereof. As the Project is below the established thresholds, no WSA is required. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD,approximately 48 percent of CVWD's overall supply comes from local groundwater wells in the Chino Groundwater Basin and the Cucamonga Basin. CVWD currently operates 20 groundwater wells throughout its service area.Three percent of the water delivered to CVWD consumers is local canyon and tunnel water that flows out of nearby canyons and foothills, often a combination of surface and groundwater. These sources include Cucamonga Canyon, Day Canyon, Deer Canyon, East Etiwanda Canyon, and a number of tunnels in the local mountains. This water is treated at CVWD's Arthur H. Bridge or Lloyd W. Michael Treatment Plants, flows into storage reservoirs, and then into the distribution system to consumers. CVWD purchases 46 percent of its water through the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, who purchases water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), a regional water wholesaler that delivers imported water from the State Water Project. State Water Project water originates in Northern California in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, and makes a 400 mile journey to the CVWD service area. This water is treated at CVWD's Lloyd W.Michael Water Treatment Plant,the largest conventional treatment plant in the region.The treated water is stored in reservoirs until it is needed by consumers. The water used within the CVWD service area as of 2015 was Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 87 Page 470 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts approximately 41,451 AFY and is expected to increase to 63,700 AFY(during a normal year) by the year 2035, an increase of 22,249 AFY.44 Based on the CaIEEMod assumptions, the combined estimated water demand for the proposed Project is approximately 7.17 AFY, within the estimated increase in water demand. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD,there is sufficient supply to accommodate demand under normal and single-and multiple-dry year conditions utilizing imported water.45 Local supplies would supplement imported supplies and provide additional supply reliability. Local supplies include groundwater pumped from the Cucamonga and Chino groundwater Basins, desalinated groundwater, and recycled water. The UWMP is based on area population Projections as provided by SCAG. As discussed in Section 4.13, the Project is consistent with SCAG Projections for the service area.As the estimated increase in water use is within the anticipated increase in the UWMP and the Project is consistent with regional population Projections, impacts would be less than significant. Regarding wastewater facilities, as discussed in the preceding response, wastewater generated at the Project site is treated at IEUA's Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4)facilities. The proposed Project is estimated to have a combined wastewater generation of approximately 5,122 gpd.This generation is well within the existing remaining treatment capacity of RP-1 and RP-4.Therefore, the expansion of the existing facility would not be required. Connections to local water and sewer mains would involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that would occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements.The Project site is located within the existing service area of CVWD and is surrounded by existing development that is currently connected to existing CVWD water and wastewater lines.No additional improvements are needed to either water lines, sewer lines, or treatment facilities to serve the Project. Standard connection fees would address any incremental impacts of the Project.Therefore,the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts as a result of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts could occur as a result of this Project if storm water runoff was increased to a level that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities.As discussed in the Hydrology section, the Project would not generate any increased runoff from the site that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities. A NPDES permit would be required for the Project and, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, all construction Projects shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion shall also be applied pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.110. Implementation of BMPs would reduce pollutants in stormwater and urban runoff from the Project site. The proposed storm drainage system and BMPs must be designed to the satisfaction of the City's Public Works Director and in conformance with all applicable permits and regulations. The Project applicant/developer would be required to provide all necessary on-site infrastructure. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation beyond compliance with existing regulations is required. The proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on requiring the construction of new facilities or expansion of existing storm drainage facilities. d) Less than Significant Impact.The Project could result in significant impacts if it required additional water supplies than are currently entitled.Water demand is provided by survey data utilized in the CalEEMod air quality model.Total water demand for the proposed Project is estimated at 2,336,610 gallons per year or 7.17 AFY. This number represents a conservative estimate because the proposed car wash would also utilize recycled water for car wash needs. Water demand within the EMWD service area is anticipated to increase by 22,249 AFY between 2015 and 2035.The Project's conservative estimated water demand, 7.17 AFY, is well within anticipated increase in demand. Based on the CVWD 2015 UWMP, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project's estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies, and therefore would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. As summarized above, the 2015 UWMP indicates that there is adequate supply to serve the projected demand. The Project would comply with all water conservation and efficiency standards required by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Works 88 Initial Study Page 471 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Department. Therefore, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project's estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies and would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. e) Less than Significant Impact. As detailed in Sections 4.17.a and 4.17.b, the Project would be adequately served by existing facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. f) Less than Significant Impact. Significant impacts could occur if the Project would exceed the existing permitted landfill capacity or violates federal,state,and local statutes and regulations. Solid Waste services are provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division (SWMD). Solid waste collection and transport in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities. The County of San Bernardino contracted Burrtec to operate and maintain their solid waste disposal facilities located throughout the County. Solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Burrtec's West Valley Materials Recovery Facility(MRF). Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, a County Class III (i.e., municipal waste)landfill located at 2390 North Alder Avenue in Rialto(Ceballos 2009).According to the 2010 General Plan Update, Mid Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tons/day), a remaining capacity of 670,000 cubic yards(cy), and an anticipated close date of 2033. Landfill capacity is expected to decrease over time with future growth and development throughout San Bernardino County and surrounding Inland Empire areas. Waste reduction and recycling programs and regulations are expected to reduce this demand and extend the life of existing landfills.Construction and operation of the proposed Project would result in an estimated net increase in solid waste disposal of 27.85 tons per year. This increase is well within the remaining capacity of Mid-Valley Landfill's daily permitted capacity. This nominal incremental increase in solid waste disposal, assuming that all solid waste in the City would be disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill,would not be considered cumulative considerable.Therefore,impacts related to the proposed Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Compliance with County waste reduction programs and policies would reduce the volume of solid waste entering landfills. Individual development projects within the County would be required to comply with applicable state and local regulations, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50 percent. The Project would increase the volume of solid waste generated in the County by 27.85 tons per year. According to CalRecycle, solid waste facilities serving San Bernardino County are projected to have a combined annual disposal limit of 3,633,512 tons and an annual remaining lifetime capacity surplus of 154,709,576 tons in the year 2025.16 Combined remaining capacities at the landfills would be adequate to accommodate the proposed Project. Impacts related to sufficient landfill capacity are anticipated to be less than significant. g) No Impact.The Project is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, County, and City statutes and regulations related to solid waste as a standard Project condition of approval.Therefore, no impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to utilities/service systems. The Project would require use of existing water and wastewater infrastructure,as well as existing,available solid waste disposal for building facility operation. Development of public utility infrastructure is part of an extensive planning process involving utility providers and jurisdictions with discretionary review authority. The coordination process associated with the preparation of development and infrastructure plans is intended to ensure that adequate resources are available to serve both individual projects and cumulative demand for resources and infrastructure as a result of cumulative growth and development in the area. Individual projects are subject to review for utility capacity to avoid unanticipated interruptions in service or inadequate supplies. Coordination with the utility companies would allow for the provision of utility service to the Project and other developments. The Project and other planned projects are subject to connection and service fees to assist in facility expansion and service improvements triggered by an increase in demand. Because of the utility planning and coordination activities described above, no significant cumulative utility impacts are anticipated. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 89 Page 472 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.19- Mandatory Findings of Significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ ❑ ❑ community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively ❑ ❑ ❑ considerable? c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects ❑ ❑ ❑ on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed Project would not substantially impact any scenic vistas, scenic resources, or the visual character of the area, as discussed in Section 4.1 and would not result in excessive light or glare. The Project site is located within a developed area with no natural habitat. The Project would not significantly impact any sensitive plants, plant communities,fish, wildlife or habitat for any sensitive species.There would be no impact to migratory birds. Adverse impacts to historic resources would not occur with mitigation incorporation. Construction-phase procedures would be implemented in the event any important cultural, archaeological, or paleontological resources are discovered during grading, consistent with Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-9. This site is not known to have any association with an important example of California's history or prehistory.Based on the preceding analysis of potential impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17,no evidence is presented that this Project would degrade the quality of the environment. Impacts related to degradation of the environment, biological resources, and cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would result in significant impacts in the following areas: cultural resources, noise, and traffic. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for each of these environmental issue areas in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Standard conditions would also be imposed upon the Project. Other new development projects within the City would also be subject to these requirements. All other impacts of the Project were determined either to have no impact or to be less than significant, without the need for mitigation. Cumulatively,the Project would not result in any significant impacts that would substantially combine with impacts of other current or probable future impacts.Therefore,the Project, in conjunction with other future projects,would not result in any cumulatively considerable impacts. c) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the analysis of the Project's impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17,there is no indication that the proposed Project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of temporary adverse effects during construction related to noise these would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation. Long-term effects include increased vehicular traffic, traffic-related noise, use 90 Initial Study Page 473 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of household hazardous materials,emissions of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions,and increased demand on emergency response services. The analysis herein concludes that direct and indirect environmental effects would at worst require mitigation to reduce to less than significant levels. Environmental effects would result in less than significant impacts. Based on the analysis in this Initial Study, the City finds that direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 91 Page 474 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts This Page Intentionally Left Blank 92 Initial Study Page 475 5 Mitigation Summary 113I0-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season(typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities(including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging,clearing,grubbing,vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area(in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five(5)days or longer occurs,an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest,the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes(e.g.young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six(6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits,construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required.The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor,who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 93 Page 476 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated.A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist's discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts,as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance.The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer)shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find.Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period.Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources,as defined by CEQA(as amended,2015),are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project,work in the immediate vicinity(within a 100-foot buffer of the find)shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code§7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant,as defined by CEQA(as amended,2015),a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. 94 Initial Study Page 477 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC.The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified.The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin,the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" or "unique archaeological resource", time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f)for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 95 Page 478 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MILD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe, the term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to,the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. NO1-1 The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction: • Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines.Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: 96 Initial Study Page 479 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays,with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site(i.e., to the center)during construction. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines(i.e., in excess of 5 minutes)will be prohibited. • Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance. • The Project will designate a "construction liaison" that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site. • If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. NO1-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5)feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight(8)feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks during grading and earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two(2)feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required.The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor,who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist,who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 97 Page 480 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated.A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s)and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant,the South Central Costal Information Center,the City,and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures.The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any,evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. 98 Initial Study Page 481 6 References 6.1 - List of Preparers City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) Planning Department 909-477-2750 Ext.4314 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ■ Tabe Van der Zwaag,Associate Planner MIG (Environmental Analysis) 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 951-787-9222 ■ Pamela Steele, Principal ■ Bob Prasse, Director of Environmental Services ■ Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY(Phase I ESA) 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California 91784 951-315-3517 ■ Christopher Krall, Engineering Geologist LDN CONSULTING, INC. (Noise) 42428 Chisolm Trail Murrieta, California 92562 760-473-1253 ■ Jeremy Louden, Principal Trames Solutions, Inc. (Traffic and Transportation) 4225 Oceanside Blvd.,#354H Oceanside, California 92056 760-291-1400 ■ Scott Sato, P.E. 6.2- Persons and Organizations Consulted None Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 99 Page 482 References 6.3- Bibliography 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. May, 2010. 2 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Los Angeles County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/index.htm [August 2018]. 3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: San Bernardino County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/index.htm [September 2018]. 4 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/[September 2018]. 5 California Department of Conservation.Williamson Act Program. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dIrp/wa/SanBernardino so 15 16 WA.pdf[September 2018]. 6 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 1993. 7 California Air Resources Board. South Coast Air Quality Management Plans. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/scabsip/scabsip.htm. [February 2020]. 8 International Car Wash Association.Water Use, Evaporation and Carryout in Professional Car Washes. By Chris Brown Consulting. https://www.carwash.org/docs/default-source/2018-water-study/ica---water-qualitv.pdf?sfvrsn=c27ldb4b 2. [February 20201. 9 Trames Solutions, Inc.Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. 11 San Bernardino Associated Governments. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. June 2016. 12 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CNDDB Quick View Tool: Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018410-cnddb-guickview-tool [September 2018]. 13 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html [September 2019]. 14 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. NCCP Plan Summaries. https:Hnrm.dfq.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=15329&inline[September 2018]. 15 California State Department of Conservation.Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps. http://www.quake.ca.gov/qmaps/ap/ap maps.htm [September 2018]. 16 San Bernardino County: Land Use Services. Geologic Hazard Overlay maps. http://cros.sbcountygov/lus/Plannin /q ZoningOverlayMaps/GeologicHazardMaps.aspx[September 2018]. 17 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics.April 2009. 18 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions.August 2010 19 Trames Solutions, Inc.Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 20 State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/[September 20181. 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1403:Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. Amended October 5, 2007 22 California Department of Toxic Substances. Draft Lead Report. June 2004. 23 California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/[September 20181. 24 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List—Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese List.cfm [September 2018]. 25 California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/[September 2018]. 100 Initial Study Page 483 References 26 California State Water Resources Control Board. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/files/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList- CurrentList.pdf[September 2018]. 27 California State Water Resources Control Board. List of Active CDO and CAO. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/[September 20181. 28 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a). https://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselisVsection-65962-5a/[September 2018]. 29 Federal Aviation Administration.Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/airportdata 5010/[September 2018] 30 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones In LRA—South West San Bernardino County. November 2008. 31 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number 06071C8630J. February 18, 2015. 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Health and Safety Element. Figure PS-6. May 2010. 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Resource Conservation Element. Figure CR-2. May 2010. 34 Ldn Consulting, Inc.Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment. May 26, 2018. 35 Ldn Consulting, Inc.Arbor Car Wash Facility Construction Noise Assessment. January 7, 2019. 36 California Department of Transportation. Basics of Highway Noise:Technical Noise Supplement. September 2013. 37 California Governor's Office of Planning and Research. General Plan Guidelines. 2003. 38 California Department of Transportation. Transportation-and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. September 2013. 39 Federal Aviation Administration.Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/airportdata 5010/[September 2018]. 40 The Brookings Institute. Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. 1999. 41 Trames Solutions, Inc.Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 42 OmniTrans. Route 66: Fontana-Foothill-Montclair. http://www.omnitrans.org/schedules/route66/[September 2018]. 43 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 44 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 45 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 46 CalRecycle. Identify Disposal Facility Capacity Shortfalls. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/FacIT/facilitv/disposalgap.aspx [September 2018]. Arbor Express Car Wash(13603) 101 Page 484 Appendix A Air Quality/ GHG Modeling Data Page 485 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 486 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 + 1000sgft ; 0.90 39,254.00 i 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = - - '------------------ --------------- Other Non-Asp halt Surfaces 18.27 + 1000sg } ft ; 0.42 18,267.00 1 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- -------------- ------------------E--------------- Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sgft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Page 487 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Page 488 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 4.00 3.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 23.72 97.37 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblWater I ndoorWaterUse Rate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 2.0 Emissions Summary Page 489 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2019 •i 17.0092 i 25.3989 16.0127 i 0.0327 � 6.4193 1.2974 i 7.3023 3.0347 i 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 i 3,279.976 3,279.976 i 0.6608 0.0000 31296.497 5 i 5 i i i 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 6.4193 1.2974 7.3023 3.0347 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 3,279.976 3,279.976 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 11 5 5 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2019 •i 17.0092 i 25.3989 i 16.0127 i 0.0327 i 2.9378 1.2974 i 3.8209 i 1.3786 i 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 i 3,279.976 i 3,279.976 i 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 2.9378 1.2974 3.8209 1.3786 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 3,279.976 3,279.976 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 5 5 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Page 490 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 i 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Energy •i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 i 0.0535 � 3.8000e- i i 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- � i 76.3633 i 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- � 76.8171 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i Mobile i 1.2433 i 5.7012 i 14.5536 0.0475 i 3.6694 i 0.0470 i 3.7163 i 0.9817 i 0.0441 1.0258 :-4,829.392 i 4,829.392 i 0.2494 i 1 4,835.628 2 i 2 i i i 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 4,905.769 0.2509 1.4000e- 4,912.460 7 7 003 3 Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area ;� 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.0000e- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- � i 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 , 005 i Energy ;i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 i 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- � i 76.3633 76.3633 i 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i Mobile ;� 1.2433 i 5.7012 14.5536 i 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 i 3.7163 0.9817 i 0.0441 1.0258 � i 4,829.392 4,829.392 i 0.2494 4,835.628 2 2 i 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 4,905.769 0.2509 1.4000e- 4,912.460 7 7 003 3 Page 491 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBlo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 •Demolition +Demolition !1/1/2019 11/1/2019 5: 1 i i _ 2 •Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/2/2019 :1/2/2019 5: 1 i i 3 •Grading +Grading !1/3/2019 i1/7/2019 5: 3: i i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !1/8/2019 i5/27/2019 5: 100: i i 5 •Paving +Paving !5/28/2019 i 6/3/2019 5: 5 + I 1 1 6 •Architectural Coating •Architectural Coating -6/4/2019 -6/10/2019 5• 5, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Page 492 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1; 8.001 81: 0.73 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247: 0.40 --------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- i Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3: 8.001 97: 0.37 --------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation 'Graders 1 8.001 187: 0.41 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.001 247: 0.40 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.001 97: 0.37 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 6.001 187: 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 6.001 247, 0.40 + _ __ i __ i Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 1 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Cranes 1 6.001 231, 0.29 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction +Forklifts 1 6.001 89: 0.20 ---------------------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------i------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets 1 8.001 84, 0.74 - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- �_ � _ i Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.001 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Welders 31 8.001 46, 0.45 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- i Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.001 9 0.56 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 6.00 1 130: 0.42 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 1; 8.001 132: 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 7.001 80, 0.38 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 i 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------s-------------r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT Page 493 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 5' 13.00: 0.00: 9.00: 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT -----------------AT------------- ----------------- ---------i --------- ' ---------------------------------i----------r Site Preparation 3; 8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix ?HHDT ----------------• _____________�____________________, ---__---i ---------L-------------- �__________r__________ i------------ , ----------�- Grading 3; 8.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT ________________• ____________AII _�____________________, ---__---i _________ _________ _________-_____________!----------r--------_ Building Construction 's 7; 26.00- 11.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix ;HHDT --------------= i------------------------------- --------------------- i----------r Paving 5; 13.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT Architectural Coating ; 1 5.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 i 0.2850 0.0000 ; 0.2850 � i � 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 2.2950 i 22.6751 i 14.8943 0.0241 i 1.2863 1.2863 i 1.2017 ; 1.2017 i 2,360.719 1 2,360.719: 0.6011 i i 2,375.747 8 i 8 i i i 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 2,360.719 0.6011 2,375.747 8 8 5 Page 494 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0775 i 2.6797 i 0.5361 7.0700e- i 0.1572 � 0.0100 0.1672 i 0.0431 9.5800e- 0.0527 i 765.8097 � 765.8097 � 0.0549 i i 767.1828 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0631 i 0.0442 i 0.5823 1.5400e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- i i 153.5672 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 i 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 ---- ---•r------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j---------------+ ---- r--------------j-------j-------+ ---- Off-Road •i 2.2950 i 22.6751 i 14.8943 � 0.0241 i � 1.2863 � 1.2863 i � 1.2017 � 1.2017 � 0.0000 i 2,360.719�2,360.719� 0.6011 i i 2,375.747 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 2,360.719 0.6011 2,375.747 7 7 5 Page 495 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0775 i 2.6797 i 0.5361 7.0700e- i 0.1572 � 0.0100 0.1672 i 0.0431 9.5800e- 0.0527 i 765.8097 � 765.8097 � 0.0549 i i 767.1828 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0631 i 0.0442 i 0.5823 1.5400e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 i 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- i i 153.5672 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 i 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 -----------%i------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+-------i---------------'-------j-------+------- Off-Road •i 1.7123 i 19.4821 i 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 i i 1,718.404 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 1,718.404 9 9 4 Page 496 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0388 i 0.0272 i 0.3584 9.5000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- i i 94.5029 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 94.53 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 i 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 1.7123 i 19.4821 i 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 i 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 i i 1,718.404 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 1,718.404 9 9 4 Page 497 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0388 i 0.0272 i 0.3584 9.5000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- i i 94.5029 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 94.5029 004 004 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 i 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+------- ---------------j-------j------- +------- Off-Road •i 1.4197 i 16.0357 i 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 i i 1,407.435 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 77T 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 1,407.435 9 9 9 Page 498 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0388 i 0.0272 i 0.3584 9.5000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- i i 94.5029 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 94.53 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 i 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 1.4197 i 16.0357 i 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 i 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 i i 1,407.435 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 1,407.435 9 9 9 Page 499 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0388 i 0.0272 i 0.3584 9.5000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- i i 94.5029 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 94.53 004 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 2.2721 i 15.9802 i 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 i i 2,027.721 '� i i i i i i i i • 4 i 4 i i i 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 2,027.721 4 4 0 Page 500 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0429 i 1.2627 i 0.3114 � 2.8300e- i 0.0704 � 8.3700e- � 0.0788 i 0.0203 � 8.0100e- 0.0283 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 i i 302.4713 003 003 003 Worker •i 0.1262 i 0.0883 i 1.1646 3.0800e- i 0.2906 2.2700e- 0.2929 i 0.0771 2.1000e- 0.0792 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- i i 307.1345 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 [77T 608.8574 608.8574 1 0.0299 609.6058 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 i 15.9802 i 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 i 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 i i 2,027.721 i i i i i i i i • 4 4 i 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 2,018.022 1 0.3879 2,027.721 4 4 0 Page 501 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0429 i 1.2627 i 0.3114 2.8300e- i 0.0704 8.3700e- 0.0788 i 0.0203 8.0100e- 0.0283 i 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 i i 302.4713 003 003 003 Worker •i 0.1262 i 0.0883 i 1.1646 3.0800e- i 0.2906 2.2700e- 0.2929 i 0.0771 2.1000e- 0.0792 i 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- i i 307.1345 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 [777608.8574 608.8574 0.0299 609.6058 003 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 0.9038 i 9.1743 i 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 i i 1,335.375 '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 1 Paving •1 0.4716 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 1 17335.375 3 3 1 Page 502 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0631 i 0.0442 i 0.5823 1.5400e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 i 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- i i 153.5672 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 153.5672 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 0.9038 i 9.1743 i 8.9025 0.0135 i 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 1,335.375 '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 1 Paving •i 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 1 17335.375 3 3 1 Page 503 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0631 i 0.0442 i 0.5823 1.5400e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 i 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- i i 153.5672 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 153.5672 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •1 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+------- ------------------------------- +------ - Off-Road •i 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 � 2.9700e- i � 0.1288 � 0.1288 i � 0.1288 0.1288 � i 281.4481 � 281.4481 � 0.0238 i i 282.0423 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 003 Page 504 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0243 i 0.0170 i 0.2240 � 5.9000e- i 0.0559 � 4.4000e- � 0.0563 i 0.0148 � 4.000Oe- 0.0152 � i 59.0181 � 59.0181 � 1.8500e- i i 59.0643 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.000Oe- 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 59.0643 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •1 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 i i 282.0423 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 003 Page 505 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0243 i 0.0170 i 0.2240 � 5.9000e- i 0.0559 � 4.4000e- � 0.0563 i 0.0148 � 4.00OOe- 0.0152 � i 59.0181 � 59.0181 � 1.8500e- i i 59.0643 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.00OOe- 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 59.0643 004 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Page 506 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 1.2433 � 5.7012 i 14.5536 i 0.0475 i 3.6694 i 0.0470 i 3.7163 i 0.9817 i 0.0441 1.0258 � i 4,829.392�4,829.392� 0.2494 � i 4,835.628 2i i i i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 1 Unmitigated 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392•4,829.392• 0.2494 4,835.628 2 2 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center + 709.83 ; 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 ......................................------------ ---------- ---------- -----------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ....................................................------------T---------- --------------------- ------------------------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 } 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 ........................---------- - -------- ------- --------- --------- -------- --------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------rt---------T----------T------------------ --------t-----------r___________r__________r_________________ Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Page 507 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY I SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339+ 0.043800; 0.200255; 0.122233; 0.016799; 0.005871; 0.020633; 0.029727; 0.002027; 0.001932; 0.004726; 0.0007041 0.000955 r t---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5503391 0.0438001 0.2002551 0.1222331 0.0167991 0.0058711 0.0206331 0.0297271 0.0020271 0.0019321 0.0047261 0.000704, 0.000955 r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339. 0.043800, 0.200255, 0.122233, 0.016799, 0.005871, 0.020633, 0.029727, 0.002027, 0.001932, 0.004726, 0.000704, 0.000955 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 7.000Oe- 0.0636 i 0.0535 i 3.8000e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 i 76.3633 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- i 76.8171 Mitigated :i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i NaturalGas 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- - 4.8400e- 4.8400e- - 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- - 1.4000e- 76.8171 Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Page 508 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care i 649.088 •i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- 76.8171 Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i --------- i ------- -------'------- ------- ------- ------- -------'--------- -- ------- ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.7400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care 0.649088�i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 i 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- i 76.8171 Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------�-------'---------------+---- -� I-------�--------------- ------ --------ter i i i i i i i i �- i i i *------- Other Asphalt 1 0 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces --------- •� ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------�-------'---------------+---- -� �-------�-------�---------ter i i i i i i i i �- i � i *------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i Total 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 6.0 Area Detail Page 509 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- i 6.6600e- 0.0000 i i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 i 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Unmitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 6.6600e- 0.0000 - 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 0.0142 - 4.000Oe- • 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.0229 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating %------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --- + ------ ------- ------- -------* Consumer •i 0.1648 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � � 0.0000 Products •� i Landscaping •i 6.3000e- i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.1883 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 0.0142 4.000Oe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Page 510 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.0229 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.1648 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i � � 0.0000 Products '� i Landscaping •i 6.3000e- i 6.00OOe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.00OOe- 0.0151 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.1883 6.00OOe- I 6.6600e- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0142 0.0142 4.00OOe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Page 511 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Page 512 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 + 1000sgft ; 0.90 39,254.00 i 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = - - '------------------ --------------- Other Non-Asp halt Surfaces 18.27 + 1000sg } ft ; 0.42 18,267.00 1 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- -------------- ------------------E--------------- Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sgft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Page 513 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Page 514 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 4.00 3.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 23.72 97.37 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblWater I ndoorWaterUse Rate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 2.0 Emissions Summary Page 515 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2019 •i 17.0115 i 25.4397 � 15.9988 i 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 i 7.3023 3.0347 i 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 i 3,257.585 3,257.585 i 0.6628 0.0000 31274.154 5 i 5 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 7.3023 3.0347 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 3,257.585 3,257.585 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 5 5 4 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2019 •i 17.0115 i 25.4397 i 15.9988 i 0.0325 i 2.9378 1.2976 i 3.8209 i 1.3786 i 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 i 3,257.585 i 3,257.585 i 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 2.9378 1.2976 3.8209 1.3786 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 3,257.585 3,257.585 0.6628 1 0.0000 3,274.154 5 5 4 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Page 516 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 i 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Energy •i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 i 0.0535 � 3.8000e- i i 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- � i 76.3633 i 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- � 76.8171 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i i ---- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------------_------- ------- -------�-------�-------*------- Mobile i 1.1955 i 5.8094 i 13.9106 0.0450 i 3.6694 i 0.0473 i 3.7167 i 0.9817 i 0.0444 1.0261 � i 4,577.876 i 4,577.876 i 0.2504 4,584.136 9 i 9 i 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 4,654.254 0.2519 1.4000e- 4,660.968 3 3 003 7 Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area ;� 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.0000e- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- � i 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 , 005 i Energy ;i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 i 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- � i 76.3633 76.3633 i 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i Mobile ;� 1.1955 i 5.8094 13.9106 i 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 i 3.7167 0.9817 i 0.0444 1.0261 � i 4,577.876 4,577.876 i 0.2504 4,584.136 9 9 i 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 4,654.254 0.2519 1.4000e- 4,660.968 3 3 003 7 Page 517 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBlo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 •Demolition +Demolition !1/1/2019 11/1/2019 5: 1 i i _ 2 •Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/2/2019 :1/2/2019 5: 1 i i 3 •Grading +Grading !1/3/2019 i1/7/2019 5: 3: i i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !1/8/2019 i5/27/2019 5: 100: i i 5 •Paving +Paving !5/28/2019 i 6/3/2019 5: 5 + I 1 1 6 •Architectural Coating •Architectural Coating -6/4/2019 -6/10/2019 5• 5, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Page 518 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1; 8.001 81: 0.73 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247: 0.40 --------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- i Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3: 8.001 97: 0.37 --------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation 'Graders 1 8.001 187: 0.41 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.001 247: 0.40 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.001 97: 0.37 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 6.001 187: 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 6.001 247, 0.40 + _ __ i __ i Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 1 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Cranes 1 6.001 231, 0.29 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction +Forklifts 1 6.001 89: 0.20 ---------------------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------i------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets 1 8.001 84, 0.74 - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- �_ � _ i Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.001 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Welders 31 8.001 46, 0.45 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- i Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.001 9 0.56 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 6.00 1 130: 0.42 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 1; 8.001 132: 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 7.001 80, 0.38 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 i 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------s-------------r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT Page 519 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 5' 13.00: 0.00: 9.00: 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT -----------------AT------------- ----------------- ---------i --------- ' ---------------------------------i----------r Site Preparation 3; 8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix ?HHDT ----------------• _____________�____________________, ---__---i ---------L-------------- �__________r__________ i------------ , ----------�- Grading 3; 8.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT ________________• ____________AII _�____________________, ---__---i _________ _________ _________-_____________!----------r--------_ Building Construction 's 7; 26.00- 11.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix ;HHDT --------------= i------------------------------- --------------------- i----------r Paving 5; 13.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix EHDT_Mix EHHDT Architectural Coating ; 1 5.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 i 0.2850 0.0000 ; 0.2850 � i � 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 2.2950 i 22.6751 i 14.8943 0.0241 i 1.2863 1.2863 i 1.2017 ; 1.2017 i 2,360.719 1 2,360.719: 0.6011 i i 2,375.747 8 i 8 i i i 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 2,360.719 0.6011 2,375.747 8 8 5 Page 520 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0796 i 2.7162 i 0.5754 6.9500e- i 0.1572 � 0.0102 � 0.1674 i 0.0431 9.7600e- 0.0528 i 752.9340 � 752.9340 � 0.0571 i i 754.3624 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0693 i 0.0485 i 0.5291 1.4500e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- i i 144.0446 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 i 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 ---- ---•r------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j---------------+ ---- r--------------j-------j-------+ ---- Off-Road •i 2.2950 i 22.6751 i 14.8943 � 0.0241 i � 1.2863 � 1.2863 i � 1.2017 � 1.2017 � 0.0000 i 2,360.719�2,360.719� 0.6011 i i 2,375.747 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 2,360.719 0.6011 2,375.747 7 7 5 Page 521 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0796 i 2.7162 i 0.5754 6.9500e- i 0.1572 � 0.0102 � 0.1674 i 0.0431 9.7600e- 0.0528 i 752.9340 � 752.9340 � 0.0571 i i 754.3624 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0693 i 0.0485 i 0.5291 1.4500e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- i i 144.0446 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 i 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 -----------%i------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+-------i---------------'-------j-------+------- Off-Road •i 1.7123 i 19.4821 i 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 i i 1,718.404 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 1,718.404 9 9 4 Page 522 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0299 i 0.3256 8.9000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 � 88.5734 2.7800e- i i 88.6428 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 88.67 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 i 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 1.7123 i 19.4821 i 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 i 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 i i 1,718.404 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 1,704.918 0.5394 1,718.404 9 9 4 Page 523 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0299 i 0.3256 8.9000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 � 88.5734 2.7800e- i i 88.6428 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.780077 88.6428 004 004 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 i 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+------- ---------------j-------j------- +------- Off-Road •i 1.4197 i 16.0357 i 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 i i 1,407.435 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 77T 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 1,407.435 9 9 9 Page 524 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0299 i 0.3256 8.9000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 � 88.5734 2.7800e- i i 88.6428 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 88.67 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 i 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •i 1.4197 i 16.0357 i 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 i 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 i i 1,407.435 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 1,396.390 0.4418 1,407.435 9 9 9 Page 525 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0299 i 0.3256 8.9000e- i 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 i 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 � 88.5734 2.7800e- i i 88.6428 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 0.0894 7.000Oe- 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.780077 88.67 004 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 2.2721 i 15.9802 i 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 i i 2,027.721 '� i i i i i i i i • 4 i 4 i i i 0 j [ Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 2,018.022 1 0.3879 2,027.721 4 4 0 Page 526 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0447 i 1.2643 i 0.3448 2.7500e- i 0.0704 8.5000e- 0.0789 i 0.0203 8.1300e- 0.0284 i 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 003 003 003 Worker •i 0.1386 i 0.0971 i 1.0581 2.8900e- i 0.2906 2.2700e- 0.2929 i 0.0771 2.1000e- 0.0792 i 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- i i 288.0891 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 [777T581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 i 15.9802 i 13.4870 0.0220 i i 0.9158 i 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 i 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 2,027.721 i i i i i i i • 4 4 i 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 2,018.022 0.3879 2,027.721 4 4 0 Page 527 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0447 i 1.2643 i 0.3448 2.7500e- i 0.0704 8.5000e- 0.0789 i 0.0203 8.1300e- 0.0284 i 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 003 003 003 Worker •i 0.1386 i 0.0971 i 1.0581 2.8900e- i 0.2906 2.2700e- 0.2929 i 0.0771 2.1000e- 0.0792 i 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- i i 288.0891 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 [777T581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 003 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 0.9038 i 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 i i 1,335.375 '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 1 Paving •1 0.4716 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 1 17335.375 3 3 1 Page 528 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0693 i 0.0485 i 0.5291 1.4500e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 i 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- i i 144.0446 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 144.0446 0.0396 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 0.9038 i 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 i 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 i i 1,335.375 '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 1 Paving •i 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 1,325.095 0.4112 1 17335.375 3 3 1 Page 529 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0693 i 0.0485 i 0.5291 1.4500e- i 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 i 0.0385 1.0500e- 0.0396 i 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- i i 144.0446 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 0.1453 1.1400e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 144.0446 0.0396 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •1 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------i-------j---------------+------- ------------------------------- +------ - Off-Road •i 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 � 2.9700e- i � 0.1288 � 0.1288 i � 0.1288 0.1288 � i 281.4481 � 281.4481 � 0.0238 i i 282.0423 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 003 Page 530 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0267 i 0.0187 i 0.2035 5.6000e- i 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 i 0.0148 4.000Oe- 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- i i 55.4018 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.000Oe- 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 55.4018 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •1 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •1 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 i i 282.0423 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 003 Page 531 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0267 i 0.0187 i 0.2035 5.6000e- i 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 i 0.0148 4.00OOe- 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- i i 55.4018 004 004 004 . 003 i Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 0.0559 4.4000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.00OOe- 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 55.4018 004 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Page 532 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 1.1955 i 5.8094 i 13.9106 i 0.0450 i 3.6694 i 0.0473 i 3.7167 i 0.9817 i 0.0444 � 1.0261 � i 4,577.876�4,577.876� 0.2504 � i 4,584.136 2i i i i i i i i 9 i 9 i i i 5 Unmitigated 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 -4,577.876•4,577.876• 0.2504 - 4,584.136 9 9 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center + 709.83 ; 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 ......................................------------ ---------- ---------- -----------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ....................................................------------T---------- --------------------- ------------------------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 } 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 ........................---------- - -------- ------- --------- --------- -------- --------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------rt---------T----------T------------------ --------t-----------r...........r..........r................. Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Page 533 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY I SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339+ 0.043800; 0.200255; 0.122233; 0.016799; 0.005871; 0.020633; 0.029727; 0.002027; 0.001932; 0.004726; 0.0007041 0.000955 r t---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5503391 0.0438001 0.2002551 0.1222331 0.0167991 0.0058711 0.0206331 0.0297271 0.0020271 0.0019321 0.0047261 0.000704, 0.000955 r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339. 0.043800, 0.200255, 0.122233, 0.016799, 0.005871, 0.020633, 0.029727, 0.002027, 0.001932, 0.004726, 0.000704, 0.000955 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 7.000Oe- 0.0636 i 0.0535 i 3.8000e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- i i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 i 76.3633 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- i 76.8171 Mitigated :i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i NaturalGas 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- - 4.8400e- 4.8400e- - 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- - 1.4000e- 76.8171 Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Page 534 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care i 649.088 •i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- 76.8171 Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i --------- i ------- -------'------- ------- ------- ------- -------'--------- -- ------- ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.7400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care 0.649088�i 7.000Oe- i 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- i 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 i 76.3633 i 1.4600e- i 1.4000e- i 76.8171 Center 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------�-------'---------------+---- -� I-------�--------------- ------ --------ter i i i i i i i i �- i i i *------- Other Asphalt 1 0 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces --------- •� ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------�-------'---------------+---- -� �-------�-------�---------ter i i i i i i i i �- i � i *------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i Total 7.000Oe- 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 1.4000e- 76.8171 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 6.0 Area Detail Page 535 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 0.1883 i 6.000Oe- i 6.6600e- 0.0000 i i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 i 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Unmitigated 0.1883 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- 0.0000 - 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 0.0142 - 4.000Oe- • 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.0229 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating %------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --- + ------ ------- ------- -------* Consumer •i 0.1648 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � � 0.0000 Products •� i Landscaping •i 6.3000e- i 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.000Oe- 0.0151 •� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.1883 6.000Oe- 6.6600e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0142 0.0142 4.000Oe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Page 536 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.0229 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.1648 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i � � 0.0000 Products '� i Landscaping •i 6.3000e- i 6.00OOe- 6.6600e- i 0.0000 2.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0142 0.0142 i 4.00OOe- 0.0151 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.1883 6.00OOe- I 6.6600e- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0142 0.0142 4.00OOe- 0.0151 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Page 537 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 26 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Page 538 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 + 1000sgft ; 0.90 39,254.00 i 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = - - '------------------ --------------- Other Non-Asp halt Surfaces 18.27 + 1000sg } ft ; 0.42 18,267.00 1 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- -------------- ------------------E--------------- Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sgft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Page 539 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Page 540 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 4.00 3.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays } 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading } 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 23.72 97.37 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblWater I ndoorWaterUse Rate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 2.0 Emissions Summary Page 541 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG I NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 •i 0.1725 i 0.9427 0.7963 i 1.4800e- 0.0302 0.0502 i 0.0804 0.0105 i 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 i 126.7630 126.7630 i 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 003 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 0.0302 0.0502 0.0804 0.0105 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 126.7630 126.7630 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 11 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 •i 0.1725 i 0.9427 i 0.7963 i 1.4800e- 0.0238 i 0.0502 i 0.0740 i 7.4600e- i 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 i 126.7629 i 126.7629 i 0.0211 0.0000 i 127.2908 003 003 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 0.0238 0.0502 0.0740 7.4600e- 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 126.7629 126.7629 0.0211 0.0000 127.2908 003 003 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.24 0.00 7.99 28.68 0.00 5.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Page 542 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2019 3-31-2019 0.6357 0.6357 2 4-1-2019 6-30-2019 0.4763 0.4763 Highest 0.6357 0.6357 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.0343 i 1.000Oe- i 8.3000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.6100e- i 1.6100e- i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1.7200e- •� 005 004 . 003 003 i 003 Energy •i 1.2800e- i 0.0116 i 9.7600e- � 7.000Oe- i i 8.8000e- i 8.8000e- i i 8.8000e- 8.8000e- � 0.0000 i 36.2252 i 36.2252 i 1.2200e- i 4.3000e- � 36.3847 •� 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 003 004 i Mobile •1 0.2112 i 1.0770 i 2.5603 8.3100e- i 0.6557 i 8.5600e- i 0.6643 i 0.1757 i 8.0300e- 0.1837 0.0000 1 766.5484 i 766.5484 i 0.0410 i 0.0000 767.5740 •� 003 003 003 Waste •i i i � i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 i 0.0000 i 5.6533 i 0.3341 i 0.0000 14.0058 Water •i i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.6079 i 9.4381 i 10.0460 i 0.0628 i 1.5500e- 12.0802 003 i Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 0.6557 9.4400e- 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 818.4746 0.4392 1.9800e- 830.0464 003 003 003 003 Page 543 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.0343 i 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.6100e- 1.6100e- i 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- �� 005 004 ; 003 003 i 003 Energy •1 1.2800e- i 0.0116 9.7600e- i 7.000Oe- 8.8000e- i 8.8000e- i 8.8000e- 8.S000e- 0.0000 i 36.2252 36.2252 i 1.2200e- 4.3000e- 36.3847 �� 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 003 004 i Mobile 0.2112 i 1.0770 2.5603 i 8.3100e- 0.6557 8.5600e- i 0.6643 0.1757 i 8.0300e- 0.1837 0.0000 i 766.5484 � 766.5484 i 0.0410 � 0.0000 767.5740 003 003 003 . 1 i Waste 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 i 0.0000 5.6533 i 0.3341 0.0000 1 14.0058 Water •i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.6079 i 9.4381 10.0460 i 0.0628 1.5500e- 12.0802 003 i Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 0.6557 9.4400e- 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 1'818.4746 0.4392 1 1.9800e- 830.0464 003 003 003 003 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Page 544 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 I Demolition +Demolition I 1/1/2019 I 1/1/2019 5: I 1 + i i 2 •Site Preparation +Site Preparation 11/2/2019 :1/2/2019 5: 1 + i 3 :Grading +Grading i1/3/2019 :1/7/2019 5: 3: + i i 4 :Building Construction +Building Construction 11/8/2019 i5/27/2019 5: 100: + i 5 •Paving +Paving 15/28/2019 :6/3/2019 5: 5 + i 6 :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5• 5. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Page 545 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1; 8.001 81: 0.73 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247: 0.40 --------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- i Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3: 8.001 97: 0.37 --------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation 'Graders 1 8.001 187: 0.41 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.001 247: 0.40 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.001 97: 0.37 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 6.001 187: 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 6.001 247, 0.40 + _ __ i __ i Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 1 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Cranes 1 6.001 231, 0.29 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction +Forklifts 1 6.001 89: 0.20 ---------------------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------i------------ ------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets 1 8.001 84, 0.74 - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- �_ � _ i Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.001 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- _ i Building Construction 'Welders 31 8.001 46, 0.45 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- i Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.001 9 0.56 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 6.00 1 130: 0.42 �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 1; 8.001 132: 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 7.001 80, 0.38 �- - - - ------------ ------------- ----------- Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 i 97: 0.37 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------s•------------r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT Page 546 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 5' 13.00: 0.00: 9.00: 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix IHDT_Mix IHHDT -----------------AT------------- ----------------- ---------i --------- ' ---------------------------------i----------r Site Preparation 3; 8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix ?HHDT ----------------• _____________�____________________, ---__---i ---------L-------------- �__________r__________ i------------ , ----------�- Grading 3; 8.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix IHHDT ________________• ____________AII _�____________________, ---__---i _________ _________ _________-_____________!----------r--------_ Building Construction 's 7; 26.00- 11.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix ;HHDT --------------= i------------------------------- --------------------- i----------r Paving 5; 13.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix IHHDT Architectural Coating ; 1• 5.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 9.4000e- 0.0000 9.4000e- i 1.4000e- 0.0000 ; 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 •� 004 004 004 004 . i Off-Road ;� 1.1500e- i 0.0113 i 7.4500e- 1.0000e- i 6.4000e- 6.4000e- i 6.0000e- ; 6.0000e- 0.0000 i 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- i 0.0000 i 1.0776 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 1.1500e- 0.0113 7.4500e- 1.0000e- 9.4000e- 6.4000e- 1.5800e- 1.4000e- 6.000Oe- 7.4000e- 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 0.0000 1.0776 003 003 005 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 Page 547 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 4.000Oe- i 1.3800e- i 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 8.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.3449 � 0.3449 � 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.3456 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 005 : 005 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 7.000Oe- 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0664 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.4000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 1.000Oe- 1.5000e- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4112 0.4112 3.0007e- 0.0000 0.4119 11 005 003 004 004 005 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 4.2000e- 0.0000 4.2000e- i 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 •� 004 004 005 005 Off-Road •i 1.1500e- i 0.0113 i 7.4500e- 1.000Oe- 6.4000e- 6.4000e- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- i 0.0000 i 1.0776 •� 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 1.1500e- 0.0113 7.4500e- 1.000Oe- 4.2000e- 6.4000e- 1.0600e- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.6000e- 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 0.0000 1.0776 003 003 005 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 Page 548 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 4.000Oe- i 1.3800e- i 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 8.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.3449 � 0.3449 � 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.3456 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 005 : 005 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 7.000Oe- 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0664 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.4000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- j 1.000Oe- 1.5000e- 4.000Oe- j 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4112 1 0.4112 j 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1-0.4119 11 005 003 004 004 005 004 005 005 005 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 3.1600e- 0.0000 3.1600e- i 1.5100e- 0.0000 1.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 •� 003 003 003 003 Off-Road •i 8.6000e- i 9.7400e- i 3.9400e- 1.000Oe- 4.4000e- 4.4000e- 4.1000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- i 0.0000 i 0.7795 •� 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 8.6000e- 9.7400e- 3.9400e- 1.000Oe- 3.1600e- 4.4000e- 3.6000e- 1.5100e- 4.1000e- 1.9200e- 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.7795 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Page 549 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0408 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 1.7000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0408 1 0.0408 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 1.4200e- 0.0000 1.4200e- i 6.8000e- i 0.0000 6.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 •� 003 003 004 004 Off-Road •i 8.6000e- i 9.7400e- i 3.9400e- 1.000Oe- 4.4000e- 4.4000e- 4.1000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- i 0.0000 i 0.7795 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 8.6000e- 9.7400e- 3.9400e- 1.000Oe- 1.4200e- 4.4000e- 1.8600e- 6.8000e- 4.1000e- 1.0900e- 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.7795 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004 Page 550 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0408 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 1.7000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0408 1 0.0408 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 7.5700e- i 0.0000 7.5700e- i 3.8100e- 0.0000 3.8100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 003 003 Off-Road •i 2.1300e- i 0.0241 i 9.9100e- 2.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.0200e- 1.0200e- 0.0000 i 1.9002 1.9002 6.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.9152 003 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 2.1300e- 0.0241 9.9100e- 2.000Oe- 7.5700e- 1.1000e- 8.6700e- 3.8100e- 1.0200e- 4.8300e- 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.000Oe- 0.0000 1.9152 003 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 003 004 Page 551 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- i 3.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.1225 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 3.4100e- i 0.0000 3.4100e- i 1.7100e- i 0.0000 1.7100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 003 003 Off-Road •i 2.1300e- i 0.0241 i 9.9100e- 2.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.0200e- 1.0200e- 0.0000 i 1.9002 1.9002 6.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.9152 003 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 2.1300e- 0.0241 9.9100e- 2.000Oe- 3.4100e- 1.1000e- 4.5100e- 1.7100e- 1.0200e- 7300e- 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.000Oe- 0.0000 1.9152 003 003 005 003 003 003 003 003003 004 Page 552 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- i 3.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.1225 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 0.1136 i 0.7990 i 0.6744 1.1000e- 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 i 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 i 0.0000 i 91.9759 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 0.0000 91.9759 003 Page 553 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 2.1800e- i 0.0644 i 0.0164 1.4000e- i 3.4700e- 4.2000e- 3.8900e- i 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- i 0.0000 i 13.5661 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 . 004 i Worker •i 6.2600e- i 4.9900e- i 0.0543 1.5000e- i 0.0143 1.1000e- 0.0144 i 3.7900e- 1.000Oe- 3.8900e- 0.0000 i 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 13.2736 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 . 004 i Total 8.4400e- 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 0.0177 5.3000e- 0.0183 4.7900e- 5.000Oe- 5.2900e- 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3707 0.0000 26.8397 11 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 0.1136 i 0.7990 i 0.6744 1.1000e- i i 0.0458 i 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 i 91.5359 i 91.5359 i 0.0176 i 0.0000 91.9758 003 Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5359 91.5359 0.0176 0.0000 91.9758 003 Page 554 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 2.1800e- i 0.0644 i 0.0164 1.4000e- i 3.4700e- 4.2000e- 3.8900e- i 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- i 0.0000 i 13.5661 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 . 004 i Worker •i 6.2600e- i 4.9900e- i 0.0543 1.5000e- i 0.0143 1.1000e- 0.0144 i 3.7900e- 1.000Oe- 3.8900e- 0.0000 i 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 13.2736 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 . 004 i Total 8.4400e- 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 0.0177 5.3000e- 0.0183 4.7900e- 5.000Oe- 5.2900e- 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3707 0.0000 26.8397 11 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 2.2600e- i 0.0229 i 0.0223 3.000Oe- 1.3100e- 1.3100e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 i 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- i 0.0000 i 3.0286 •� 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Paving �i 1.1800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 i i i i i 1 i i • i i i i Total 3.4400e- 0.0229 0.0223 3.000Oe- 1.3100e- 1.3100e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 0.0000 3.0286 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Page 555 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6000e- i 1.2000e- i 1.3600e- 0.0000 i 3.6000e- 0.0000 3.6000e- i 9.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.3316 0.3316 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.3318 004 004 003 004 004 005 004 . 005 i Total 1.6000e- 1.2000e- 1.3600e- 0.0000 3.6000e- 0.0000 3.6000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.3318 11 004 004 003 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 2.2600e- i 0.0229 i 0.0223 3.000Oe- 1.3100e- 1.3100e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 i 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- i 0.0000 i 3.0286 •� 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 1 i Paving �i 1.1800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 i i i i i i i i • i i i i Total 3.4400e- 0.0229 0.0223 3.000Oe- 1.3100e- 1.3100e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 0.0000 3.0286 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Page 556 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6000e- i 1.2000e- i 1.3600e- 0.0000 i 3.6000e- 0.0000 3.6000e- i 9.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.3316 0.3316 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.3318 004 004 003 004 004 005 004 . 005 i Total 1.6000e- 1.2000e- 1.3600e- 0.0000 3.6000e- 0.0000 3.6000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.3318 11 004 004 003 004 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating •1 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off-Road •i 6.7000e- i 4.5900e- i 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.6397 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 i Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.0000 0.6383 1 0.6383 j 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6397 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Page 557 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- i 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.1276 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.2000e- j 0.0000 1.4000e- j 0.0000 j 1.4000e- 4.000Oe- j 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1275 1 0.1275 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 11 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating •1 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off-Road •i 6.7000e- i 4.5900e- i 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.6397 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 i Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.0000 0.6383 1 0.6383 j 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6397 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Page 558 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.00OOe- i 5.00OOe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- i 4.00OOe- 0.0000 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.1276 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 5.2000e- j 0.0000 1.4000e- j 0.0000 j 1.4000e- 4.00OOe- j 0.0000 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1275 1 0.1275 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 11 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Page 559 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.2112 i 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- i 0.6557 � 8.5600e- i 0.6643 i 0.1757 i 8.0300e- 0.1837 0.0000 i 766.5484 766.5484 � 0.0410 i 0.0000 i 767.5740 •� 003 003 003 . i Unmitigated 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- - 0.6557 8.5600e- • 0.6643 - 0.1757 8.0300e- 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 • 766.5484 • 0.0410 - 0.0000 767.5740 003 003 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center + 709.83 ; 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 ......................................------------ ---------- ---------- -----------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ....................................................------------T---------- --------------------- ------------------------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 } 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 ........................---------- - -------- ------- --------- --------- -------- --------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------rt---------T----------T------------------ --------t-----------r___________r__________r_________________ Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Page 560 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY I SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339+ 0.043800; 0.200255; 0.122233; 0.016799; 0.005871 1 0.020633; 0.029727; 0.002027; 0.001932; 0.004726; 0.0007041 0.000955 } I I I I I I I I I I t---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5503391� 0.0438001 0.2002551 0.1222331 0.0167991 0.0058711 0.0206331 0.0297271 0.0020271 0.0019321 0.0047261 0.000704, 0.000955 } I I I I I I I I I I Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339. 0.043800, 0.200255, 0.122233, 0.016799, 0.005871, 0.020633, 0.029727, 0.002027, 0.001932, 0.004726, 0.000704, 0.000955 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Electricity •1 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 23.5824 1 23.5824 19.7000e- 1 2.000Oe- 23.6668 Mitigated 004 I 004 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Electricity �� 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 23.5824 1 23.5824 19.7000e- 1 2.000Oe- 23.6668 Unmitigated .I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 . I 1 004 I 004 I •I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 �I------- I I I I I I I I +- 1- I I I T------- NaturalGas •1 1.2800e- 1 0.0116 1 9.7600e- 1 7.000Oe- 1 1 8.8000e- 18.8000e- 1 1 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 1 12.6428 1 12.6428 12.4000e- 1 2.3000e- 12.7179 Mitigated :i 003 1 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . i 1 1 004 1 004 1 ----''--- --------------------------------------------}..______......}__._......___- ....-'----'-"------------------------------}..-'----......*-------+'----'' --------------------------------------------}--------------*..---- NaturalGas 1.2800e- 0.0116 - 9.7600e- 7.000Oe- - 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- - 2.3000e- 12.7179 Unmitigated 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 Page 561 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care i 236917 •i 1.2800e- i 0.0116 9.7600e- 7.000Oe- 8.8000e- i 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 i 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- � 2.3000e- 12.7179 Center 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 004 i - ------ ------ - Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i -0-0-0-0-0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces - ------ ------ - Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 1.2800e- 0.0116 9.7600e- 7.000Oe- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 2.3000e- 12.7179 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care 236917 �i 1.2800e- i 0.0116 i 9.7600e- i 7.000Oe- 8.8000e- i 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 i 12.6428 12.6428 i 2.4000e- i 2.3000e- 12.7179 Center 1 .� 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 004 i Other Asphalt i 0 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces --------- •� ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------�-------'---------------+---- -� �-------�-------�---------ter i i i i i i i i �- i � i *------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i Total 1.2800e- 0.0116 9.76OOe- 7.000Oe- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 8.8000e- 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 2.3000e- 12.7179 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 Page 562 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care 74013.8 •i 23.5824 i 9.7000e- 2.000Oe- 23.6668 Center i ;� 004 004 ----------- •� J-------J------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces I -----------I J-------J------- Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 2.000Oe- 23.6668 004 004 Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care 74013.8 •i 23.5824 i 9.7000e- i 2.000Oe- i 23.6668 Center i ;� i 004 004 ----------- ---------------J-------J-------*------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ........... J-------J-------*------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 2.000Oe- 23.6668 004 004 6.0 Area Detail Page 563 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.0343 i 1.000Oe- i 8.3000e- 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.6100e- i 1.6100e- i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1.7200e- :� 005 004 . 003 003 i 003 Unmitigated 0.0343 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 1.6100e- 1.6100e- - 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 005 004 003 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 4.1800e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ;� 003 Consumer •i 0.0301 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 Products •� i Landscaping •i 8.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.6100e- 1.6100e- i 0.0000 0.0000 � 1.7200e- •� 005 005 004 . 003 003 i 003 Total 0.0343 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 1.6100e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 005 004 003 003 003 Page 564 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 4.1800e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 •------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------- -----+-------� ------ ------- ------- -------* ----- Consumer •i 0.0301 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 Products '� i Landscaping •i 8.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.6100e- 1.6100e- i 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- �� 005 005 004 . 003 003 i 003 Total 0.0343 1.0000e- 8.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 1.6100e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 005 004 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Page 565 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Total CO2 C74 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •i 10.0460 0.0628 i 1.5500e- i 12.0802 •� 003 i .........-e..............+------------..}..............�...... Unmitigated •• 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 12.0802 003 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care 11.91625/ •i 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- i 12.0802 Center i 0.42036 ;i 003 --------- v ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0/0 ■i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ; ---------- ------- ------- Other Non- 0/0 ■i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; Total 10.0460 j 0.0628 j 1.5500e- 12.0802 003 Page 566 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care 1 1.91625/ •i 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- i 12.0802 Center 1 0.42036 ;i i i 003 ---------------- Asphalt 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i •� •� ------- ------- Other Non- i 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� Total 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 12.0802 003 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Page 567 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 5.6533 0.3341 i 0.0000 1 14.0058 Unmitigated 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care 27.85 •i 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 i 14.0058 Center i •� ----------- Other Asphalt 0 ■i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- 0 ■i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; Total 5.6533 j 0.3341 j 0.0000 14.0058 Page 568 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care i 27.85 •i 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 i 14.0058 Center i •� •� -------------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i •� •�---------------- Non- i 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� Total 5.6533 j 0.3341 j 0.0000 14.0058 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number Page 569 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 32 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PM Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 11.0 Vegetation Page 570 Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment To be provided... Page 571 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 572 HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION Arbor Express Car Wash Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: Ruth Villalobos, President Ruth Villalobos &Associates, Inc. Ontario, California 91764 Prepared by: David Brunzell, M.A., RPA BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 Project No. RVA1802 Data Base Information: Type of Study: Intensive Survey Resources Recorded: Post War Residence at 9760 Arrow Route, Beverly Hills House at 9786 Arrow Route (Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark No. 32) USGS Quadrangle: 7.5-minute Guasti, California (1981) BCRCONSULTING LLC December 7, 2018 Page 573 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and privately owned residential properties to the east and west. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). As such it is not recommended a "historical resource" under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state "a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource...may have a significant effect on the environment." Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as "demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired" (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a "substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource." Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate ii Page 574 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT the physical impact on the environment caused by demolition or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. iii Page 575 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORICSETTING .............................................................................................................. 1 PERSONNEL..........................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..............................................................................................................................3 RESEARCH ......................................................................................................................3 FIELDSURVEY ................................................................................................................3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................4 RESEARCH ......................................................................................................................4 FIELDSURVEY................................................................................................................5 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ............................................................................................6 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA...............................................................................................6 CALIFORNIA REGISTER EVALUATIONS.......................................................................6 RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................................7 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................9 FIGURES 1: Project Location Map ........................................................................................................2 TABLES A: Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site ...............................4 APPENDICES A: DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS B: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT C: NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE Page 576 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT INTRODUCTION BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, a church and privately owned residential properties to the east, and Archibald Avenue to the west. The project site is located in Section 11 of Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. It is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Guasti, California (1981) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). HISTORIC SETTING Please note that references for this section are provided in Appendix A. The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native American group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. In 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain, the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide. Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth century, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864. German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes were the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus, olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda, where they tested their ground-breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882, the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro-electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts (also speculative agricultural colonies) were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to form Iomosa. When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma. The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma's infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and workers to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit 1 Page 577 Ita Loma WT &oD t330_ Elm BASF BASEPOAD ell •L T o) ST v ire eh A Cucamonga AMONG • H.storlCaf SM11208 '30e, Q. 16 T tz C 200 A.. i ark cc . ........... �- A--urr�" ''���/.._ _ _t19�= 70 Z z 7 zz ProjectArea 02 Sr Or 31 ATCMPSON- PlZeser�w WO 0i /aso— -Well _2 i!4 Well Vicinity Map Project Location ffn Ontario L0 ,;Aiigt+�_,� Lai A Pomona 0 0.25 0.5 1 Riverside B Kilometers Anahe 0 10 20 0 0.5 1 n(I Beach Sant-1 Miles T's'ri NMiles Project Location Site Figure 1 BCRCONSULTlNG LLC Arbor Express Car Wash Project Ruth Villalobos&Associates,Inc. F Reference:ESRI;USGS Quad:Guasti,California(1981) I Page 578 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT packinghouses, and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma's local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum. After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California's population expanded, but the process was gradual at first. Suburban expansion continued and the area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty-first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past. PERSONNEL David Brunzell, M.A., RPA acted as the Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the current study. Mr. Brunzell also compiled the Department of Park and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms and technical report. BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Joseph Orozco, M.A. ABD completed the record search through the South Central Coastal Information Center. BCR Consulting Staff Historian Dylan Williams, B.A. conducted the additional research, and BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Nicholas Shepetuk performed the field survey. METHODS Research Records Search. On November 29, 2018, a records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the current project. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and the Inventory of Historic Structures. Additional Research. BCR Consulting performed additional research through records of the General Land Office Maintained by the Bureau of Land Management, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the San Bernardino County Assessor, San Bernardino County Historical Archives, and through various Internet resources. Field Survey An intensive-level field survey of the project site was conducted on November 19, 2018. Property access was limited so survey methods included making observations and taking detail and context photographs of the subject property and buildings. Based on these limitations, archaeological resources have not been assessed for the current project. The historic-period buildings were recorded on DPR 523 forms. Cultural resources were 3 Page 579 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT recorded per the California OHP Instructions for Recording Historical Resources in the field using: • Detailed note taking for entry on DPR Forms (see Appendix A) • Digital photography of all cultural resources (see Appendix A). RESULTS Research Records Search. Data from the SCCIC revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (23 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. The records search is summarized as follows: Table A. Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site USGS 7.5 Min Cultural Resources Within 1 Mile of Project Site Studies W/in 1 Mile Quad Guasti, California P-36-2910: Historic-Period Nat.Trails Hwy. (3/4 Mile NW) SB-106-0178, 0311, (1981) P-36-10289H: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile NE) 0325, 0341, 0356, P-36-12367: Historic-Period Residence(1/2 Mile NE) 0449, 1262, 1473, P-36-16422: Historic-Period Structure(1/2 Mile S) 2290, 3572, 3589, P-36-16423: Historic-Period Building (1/2 Mile SE) 4138, 4165,4667, P-36-16425: Historic-Period Residence(1/2 Mile SW) 5493, 6812, 6817, P-36-16435: Historic-Period Residence(1/4 Mile NW) 6952, 7048, 7387, P-36-16436: Historic-Period Residence(1/2 Mile SW) 7484, 7854, 7855 P-36-16438: Historic-Period Residence(1/4 Mile E) P-36-16439: Historic-Period Market(1/2 Mile E) P-36-16440: Historic-Period Milliken Ranch (3/4 Mile E) P-36-16458: Historic-Period Residence(1/2 Mile NW) P-36-16459: Historic-Period Structure(1/2 Mile N) P-36-16460: Historic-Period Structure(1/2 Mile N) P-36-16462: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile NE) P-36-16480: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile NW) P-36-16481: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-16482: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-16483: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-16484: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-16485: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-16486: Historic-Period Residence(3/4 Mile N) P-36-21512: Historic-Period Residence(1/4 Mile NW) P-36-23221: Historic Cucamonga District(3/4 Mile NW) Additional Research. Additional research was performed for the project site to provide the background for the two properties developed during the historic era (i.e. greater than 45 years ago) within its boundaries (see also Field Survey Results, below). Review of the City's Historic Landmarks Points of Interest indicated that the Beverly Hills House (at 9786 Arrow Route) has been designated as City Landmark#32 (see Appendix A). 4 Page 580 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 9760 Arrow Route. The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954. Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joint ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today (see Appendix A for references). 9786 Arrow Route (Beverly Hills House). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (see Appendix A for references). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler's reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (ibid.). Field Survey 9760 Arrow Route. This property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage unit and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false-paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). Since access was limited, descriptions are made using available photographs and observations from the edge of the property boundary. This property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It was built using Spanish Colonial style architecture popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta- colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence. 5 Page 581 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS During the field survey, four historic-period buildings on two separate properties were identified. CEQA calls for the evaluation and recordation of historic and archaeological resources. The criteria for determining the significance of impacts to cultural resources are based on Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and Guidelines for the Nomination of Properties to the California Register. Properties eligible for listing in the California Register and subject to review under CEQA are those meeting the criteria for listing in the California Register, or designation under a local ordinance. Significance Criteria California Register of Historical Resources. The California Register criteria are based on National Register criteria. City Landmark Designation criteria are similar to California Register criteria; the differences are bracketed [ ] below. For a property to be eligible for inclusion on the California Register or as a City Landmark, one or more of the following criteria must be met: 1. It is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local [including City] or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the U.S.; 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local [the City's], California, or U.S. history; 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, represents the work of a master, possesses high artistic values; and/or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, the California Register requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource's period of significance to "obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resources." (CCR 4852 [d][2]). The California Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its significance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. California Register Evaluation 9760 Arrow Route. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is therefore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual or possess high artistic values. 6 Page 582 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic-age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under CEQA. Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California's suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house's integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). A full California Register eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the limited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark (#32). RECOMMENDATIONS The historic-period house at 9760 Arrow Route is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register. As such it is not recommended a "historical resource" under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state "a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource...may have a significant effect on the environment." Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as "demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired" (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a "substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource." Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic 7 Page 583 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate the physical impact on the environment caused by demolition or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. 8 Page 584 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT REFERENCES California Office of Historic Preservation 2001 2001 Technical Assistance Series #1. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Historical Resources. Electronic Document: http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/ 1054/files/ts01ca.pdf. Accessed 12/7/2018. United States Geological Survey 1981 Guasti, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. PLEASE SEE APPENDIX A FOR ADDITIONAL REFERENCES. 9 Page 585 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX A DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS Page 586 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or#: 9760 Arrow Route P1. Other Identifier: N/A *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication O Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9760 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155'AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route,east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *133a. Description: The subject property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage unit and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false- paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. *133b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures, and objects.) *P4. Resources Present: O Building❑Structure ❑Object❑Site❑District ❑Element of District❑Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession#) - Photo 1: View N. *P6. Date Constructed/ Age and Sources: OHistoric .K constructed 1954 (San Bernardino Assessor)❑ - Prehistoric ❑ Both *P7. Owner and Address: z Matthews Living Trust Fund 9760 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA *P8. Recorded by: D,. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date: 11-19-18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Historical Resources Evaluation of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map O Continuation Sheet OBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): Page 587 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code: 6Z *Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder)9760 Arrow Route B1. Historic Name: N/A B2. Common Name: N/A B3. Original Use: Single-Family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Ranch/Postwar Minimal *136. Construction History: The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954 (San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. *137. Moved? ONo ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: N/A *138. Related Features: None 139a.Architect: b. Builder: Unknown *1310. Significance:Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: Mid-20th Century, 1954 Property Type: Single Family Property Applicable Criteria: N/A Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: 1950s Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: N/A 1311.Additional Resource Attributes: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical/architectural context by theme, period, and geographic scope.Address Integrity.) The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joint ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today(San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Rancho Cucamonga History The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native American group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. In 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain,the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide.Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth century, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864(City of Rancho Cucamonga). German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes were the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus,olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda,where they tested their ground-breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882,the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro-electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts(also speculative agricultural colonies)were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to (Sketch Map with north arrow re uired.) form Iomosa.When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma(Emick 2011). ` (Continued on Continuation Sheet, page 3.) Ir, *B12. References: Emick, Paula, 2011 Images of America: Rancho Cucamonga. Arcadia Publishing, r �� Charleston. City of Rancho Cucamonga, "Historic Landmarks, Points of Interest: Our Heritage," Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, "San Bernardino County File Lot Book 047: 'Cucamonga: + subject Property =- Section 11 T1S R7W"'. San Bernardino Historic Archives, San Bernardino. San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Property Information Management System. Online assessor database. http://www.sbcounty.gov/assessor/pims/ accessed 11/14/18. 1314. Evaluators: David Brunzell, BCR Consulting, Claremont, California *Date of Evaluation: 12/7/18 N\ State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder)9760 Arrow Route Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D.Williams *Date: 0 Continuation ❑ Update *1310(continued from page 2). The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma's infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and workers to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit packinghouses, and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma's local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum.After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California's population expanded, but the process was gradual at first(Emick 2011). The area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty-first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past(City of Rancho Cucamonga). Evaluation California Register of Historical Resources requires that a significance criterion (1-4) be met for a resource to be eligible. A resource is eligible if(1) it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; (2) it is associated with the lives of persons important in California's past; (3) it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value; or(4)it has yielded or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The California Register also requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource's period of significance (normally 45 years) to "obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resources" (CCR 4852 [d][21). The California Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its significance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials,workmanship,feeling, and association. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route was fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is there fore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the subject property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual or possess high artistic values. Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic-age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Thus BCR Consulting recommends the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)Status Code"6Z". Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California's suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house's integrity of design, materials,and workmanship. Page 589 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or#:The Beverly Hills House P1. Other Identifier: Beverly Hills House *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9786 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155'AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route,east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *P3a. Description: The subject property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It is a classic representation of Spanish Colonial style architecture that was popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta-colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence (San Bernardino Property Assessor 2018). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (City of Rancho Cucamonga ND). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler's reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (San Bernardino County Records 1949-1951). A full California Register of Historical Resources eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the limited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark(#32). References: San Bernardino County Assessor 2018. Records on File at the San Bernardino County Assessor.Accessed 11/20/2018. City of Rancho Cucamonga ND. Historic Landmarks Pointes of Interest. Electronic Document: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/ filebank/blobd load.aspx?blobid=10247.Accessed 11/20/2018. *P3b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential P5a. Photo or Drawin Photo re uired for buildin s,structures, and objects. *P4. Resources Present: 0 Building❑Structure❑Object ❑Site ❑District❑Element of District❑Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession#) Photo 1: Overview from Zillow.com. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: OHistoric r; constructed in 1932 (San Bernardino Property Assessor �V [PIMS])❑Prehistoric ❑Both *P7. Owner and Address: Janice Y. Gruber 9786 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 „ ' 1 *P8. Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date Recorded: 11/18/18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Cultural Resources Assessment of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ❑NONE 0 Location Map ❑ Sketch Map ❑ Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Recor",a,J�Fc Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): �_cc State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial Paget of 2 'Resource Name or#:The Beverly Hills House *Map Name:Guasti. California U5G5 7.5 Minute Quad *Scale: 1:24000 *Date of Map:1981 :+ rd6q a w 1'-sip i n8a1Nl�. ,]lir Tr3rler +• ■ *.•'i :s-i •• A11r1� {LEA �!_.! n ar L•anden rk} rr ,: A .III• :! 1 . cA►.E �t�_.... ...* . .. BM 2208 ,ray I . i' is •Iri %; ;t ,' f` �.._ a 11 aA Cam'' • L 1060===- 6everly Hills House euramongs sch l awls Pq _Reservnl + f I' .Well • •..:, -ice - 14 rr! V ��... ,•J f1 tl q P r N �.. T0 .25 .5 1 0 � km VANr:Hr. 0 .25 .5 1.0 aN'rAxro— Miles __ •��� DPR 523J (1195) 'Required information Page 591 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX B PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Page 592 Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County goo Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles,CA 90007 tel 213-763-3466 nhm.org NATURAL Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 MUSEUM e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 3 December 2018 BCR Consulting 505 West 8th Street Claremont, CA 91711 Attn: Nicholas Shepetuk, Staff Archaeologist re: Paleontological resources for the Vertebrate Paleontology Records Search for the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, project area Dear Nicholas: I have conducted a thorough check of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, project area as outlined on the portion of the Guasti USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 19 November 2018. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed project area, but we do have localities farther afield from sedimentary deposits similar to those that may occur subsurface in the proposed project area. The entire proposed project area has surficial sediments composed of soil on top of younger Quaternary Alluvium, derived as alluvial fan deposits from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, partly via Deer Creek that currently flows just to the east and via Cucamonga Creek that currently flows just to the west. These deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but they may be underlain at relatively shallow depth by older sedimentary deposits that do contain significant fossil vertebrate remains. Our closest fossil vertebrate locality from similar older Quaternary deposits is LACM 7811, due south of the proposed project area west of Mira Loma along Sumner Avenue north of Cloverdale Road, that produced a fossil specimen of whipsnake, Masticophis, at a depth of 9 to 11 feet below the surface. Further to the south between Corona and Norco our vertebrate fossil locality LACM 1207 produced a fossil specimen of deer, Odocoileus. Inspiring wonder,discovery and responsibility for our natural and cultural worlds. Page 593 Shallow excavations in the younger Quaternary Alluvium exposed in the proposed project area are unlikely to encounter significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations that extend down into older Quaternary deposits, however, may well encounter significant remains of vertebrate fossils. Any substantial excavations below the uppermost layers in the proposed project area, therefore, should be monitored closely to quickly and professionally recover any fossil remains while not impeding development. Also, sediment samples should be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project area. Any fossils collected should be placed in an accredited scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice Page 594 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX C NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE Page 595 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown,Jr.,Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 'is Cultural and Environmental Department 1550 Harbor Blvd.,Suite 100 West Sacramento,CA 95691 Phone: (916)373-3710 „a Email: nahc(cDnahc.ca.gov Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov Twitter:@CA_NAHC December 4, 2018 Nicholas Shepetuk BCR Consulting LLC VIA Email to: nickshepetuk@gmail.com RE: Arbor Express Car Wash Project, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Shepetuk: A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: katy.sanchez@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, �Q KATY SANCHEZ Associate Environmental Planner Attachment Page 596 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contacts List 12/4//2018 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Gabrielino Covina CA 91723 admin@gabrielenoindians.org (626) 926-4131 Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Anthonv Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 Gabrielino Tonqva San Gabriel CA 91778 GTTribalcouncil@aol.com (626)483-3564 Cell (626) 286-1262 Fax Gabrielino /Tongva Nation Sandonne Goad, Chairperson 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 Gabrielino Tongva Los Angeles CA 90012 sgoad@gabrielino-tongva.com (951) 807-0479 This list is current as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code,Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code, or Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native American Tribes for the proposed: Arbor Express Car Wash Project,San Bernardino County. Page 597 Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 598 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 599 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California R G S Engineering c c o l o g y www.L-gsgeosciences.com (951)315-3517 June 14, 2018 Alan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 SUBJECT: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744, 9760, & 9786 Arrow Route (APN 0208-291-06, 03, & 02) Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Smith: Enclosed, please find our Phase I Environmental Assessment report for the subject property. Our services are generally guided by the provisions of the ASTM E 1527 and EPA AAI (CFR 40 312) standards. The objective of this study is to evaluate the environmental condition of the subject property and determine the likelihood of hazardous materials impact. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations relating to the environmental condition of the property are presented herein. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, �[aNAL Q- RGS Engineering Geology 5 G l p tti� CEG�B16� r a � CEWIFIED ; CNGINESAG GCplpGLST x�ES173�1•I Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 rr OF CpL\F Engineering Geologist Distribution: [1] Addressee (electronic) Geologic Evaluation O Fault/Seismic Studies O Environmental Assessments O Rftec600tion Testing 1.0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.1 Purpose 1 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services 1 2.3 Significant Assumptions 2 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions 2 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions 2 2.6 User Reliance 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 3.1 Location and Legal Description 2 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics 3 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water) 4 3.5 Current Uses if the Adjoining Properties 4 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4 4.1 Title Records 4 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations 4 4.3 Specialized Knowledge 4 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information 4 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues 5 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information 5 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase 1 5 4.8 Other 5 5.0 RECORD REVIEW 5 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources 5 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources 6 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) 6 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property 7 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties 7 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 7 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions 7 6.2 General Site Setting 8 6.3 Exterior Observations 9 Page 601 6.4 Interior Observations 9 7.0 INTERVIEWS 9 7.1 Interview with Owner 9 7.2 Interview with Site Manager 10 7.3 Interview with Occupants 10 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials 10 7.5 Interview with Others 10 8.0 FINDINGS 11 9.0 OPINION 11 10.0 CONCLUSIONS 11 11.0 DEVIATIONS 12 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 12 13.0 REREFENCES 12 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) 12 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) 13 Page 602 Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Site Plan 1.0 SUMMARY In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject sites is considered low. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable conditions of the sites are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment conducted in accordance with our proposal and your written authorization. This report has been prepared in general conformance with applicable guidelines provided by various professional societies and institutions. Our field reconnaissance of the site was performed on Thursday June 13, 2018. The field reconnaissance involved traversing the property in order to observe surface soil conditions, structures, possible generators or storage of hazardous materials, drainage courses, land use, vegetation, and any notable surface conditions which would indicate the presence of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination on or near the site. 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to identify, to the extent feasible and pursuant to the processes presented herein, the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the properties or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water in connection with the properties. 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services The scope of work completed for this investigation included a field reconnaissance of the site and surrounding areas, historical record and document review, historic aerial photo review, and submittal of this report. RGS Engineering Geology ARe Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 2.3 Significant Assumptions This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by environmental professionals practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. In addition, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. No soil/water sampling or testing was provided for this assessment. 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions In preparing this report, we were provided information derived from secondary sources. We have made no independent investigation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived from these sources. We have assumed the information provided to us by our sources was accurate and complete. 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms or conditions were brought to our attention or discovered through the course of our investigation relating to the environmental condition of the property. 2.6 User Reliance The findings and analyses set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluation(s) and is the property and for the sole use of our Client. However; RGS may, upon written authorization and instruction from the Client, provide copies of this report, and then only in total, to whom ever instructed. Additionally, Client, without any permission from RGS may assign this report to person(s) or entity(s) of their choice and all of the same entitlements, restrictions, and limitations apply to the new entity(s) as if they were the original requestor of services. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location and Legal Description The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route, just east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The site includes three contiguous properties with the following addresses and APN numbers: RGS Engineering Geology pi 91e Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 9744 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-06-0000 9760 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-03-0000 9786 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-02-0000 The geographical relationships of the site and surrounding vicinity are depicted on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics The property located at 9744 Arrow Route is currently open and vacant. There are remnants of a previous single-family home on-site. The properties of 9760 and 9786 Arrow Route currently support occupied single-family home developments with appurtenant landscaping and yard improvements. Vegetation consists of a few mature landscape trees and landscape bushes and grass locally. Seasonal weeds and grasses occupy the open areas of the site. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient sloping to the south at less than two percent. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route which exists as an improved road with concrete curb, gutter, and pavement. 3.3 Current Use of the property Selected site photographs showing the physical condition of the property and man- made improvements are provided in Appendix B of this report for your review. The following is a brief description of the on-site features. Man-made features on the site include two single family residences with associated improvements such as driveways and landscaping. Overhead electrical lines serve the property and we assume underground utilities include sewer, water and gas. Other utilities may also be present. A pole mounted transformer was noted along the southern property line at 9760 Arrow Route. The transformer does not appear to be in a compromised condition, showing no visible leaks or damages. Asbestos The structures present on-site were likely constructed prior to the 1980's and could contain asbestos containing materials (ACM). Prior to the deconstruction or remodeling, an asbestos and lead paint survey should be conducted by a professionally licensed consultant to determine the potential impacts from these substances, if any. RGS Engineering Geology P e Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water No structures are present at 9744 Arrow Route. A residential structure is present at 9760 Arrow Route, and 9786 Arrow Route. Out buildings/sheds are also noted at 9786 Arrow Route. The residential structures and out buildings were not surveyed as part of this assessment and are reportedly limited to typical residential use and storage. No interior inspection was conducted or considered necessary as the homes are reportedly leased and used only for residential purpose. The homes are accessed along driveways extending from Arrow Route. On-site sewage disposal was likely used in the past. Septic tanks may be present on the properties. 3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties Based on our historical research, data review, and aerial photograph examination, the property is bordered to the north by a school, to the east by a residence, to the west by an abandoned gas station, and to the south by Arrow Route (4 lanes) and a retail shopping center. 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4.1 Title Records No title records were provided for our review. 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations No environmental liens or use limitation were provided by the client or known to exist in association with the property. 4.3 Specialized Knowledge We have not been provided with any specialized knowledge concerning the past land use or environmental condition of the property. 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Information has been obtained for the purpose of this Phase I environmental assessment from EDR resource group and together with our field inspection and document review represents commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information. RGS Engineering Geology 13gRe Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No reduction in the value of the property related to environmental impacts, issues, or concerns has been reported. 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information The property is currently owned by: - 9744 Arrow Route - Dejager Family Trust - 9760 Arrow Route - Mathews, Cleotis and Jancy - 9786 Arrow Route - Graber, Janice 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I It is our understanding that the client intends to develop the site as a carwash. This phase I assessment was performed as part of the due diligence associated with the development. 4.8 Other No other information of significance was provided by our client for the purpose of our assessment. 5.0 RECORD REVIEW Records were obtained and reviewed that would help identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Reasonably ascertainable information, which was publicly available, obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and that was practically reviewable, was utilized. 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources For this ESA, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) provided a complete search of standard environmental records in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E 1527-05, Section 8.2.1. A complete list of the records searched and a copy of The EDR report is presented in Appendix 16.6. Information obtained by the review of standard records indicated the following: • No facilities are noted in a condition, location, or elevation that could impact the subject property. RGS Engineering Geology P e Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources Additionally, EDR and the client/user provided records for our review from the following local agencies. • San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services, Waste Management Department • San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department • California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region • California Department of Toxic Substance Control • California Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation • Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Copies of the records requests and agency responses are contained in Appendix 16.6. The remaining agencies did not report relative information within their files. 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) The physical setting of the property was determined by review of the USGS 7.5 Minute topographic map, Guasti Quadrangle and information provided by EDR. A complete list of referenced used to findings is provided in Section 13.0, References. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient of less than two percent sloping toward the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route. The subject site is situated within a natural geomorphic province in southern California known as the Peninsular Ranges which are one of California's eleven geomorphic provinces, each of which display distinct geologic and topographic features. The Peninsular Ranges are bordered to the east by the Salton Trough and to the north by the Transverse Ranges (San Bernardino, San Gabriel, and Santa Monica Mountains). The Peninsular Range province extends southerly to the Baja peninsula and westerly to the Pacific Ocean. Elongated northwesterly- trending valleys and mountains structurally controlled by regional tectonic forces with elevated erosional surfaces generally characterize this province. The eastern portion of the province has been extensively uplifted by faulting and represents the highest and most rugged terrain including Mount San Jacinto at well over 10,000 feet elevation. From the east, the province gradually descends to the west toward the Pacific Ocean. The Peninsular Ranges are traversed by numerous northwest trending faults creating and subdividing the province into many sub-parallel, northwest trending ranges and valleys. The northwesterly trending mountains and valleys are flanked by regional faults, which remain active today, including the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault zones. RGS Engineering Geology P e Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 Locally, the site is situated on a broad alluvial fan emanating from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. These deposits consist of braised stream channel deposits of silt, sand, and gravel, and rocks. The largest sediments remain near the foothills while the finer material is distributed across the valley floor. 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property The properties were developed as rural residential homes during the 1950's based on review of historic aerial photographs. The residences remain on the eastern two parcels. The home on the western parcel was demolished around 1985. Prior to the residential development, the property was used for agricultural purpose and appears to have young citrus trees planted during 1938. No records are available beyond that year. 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties Uses in the area surrounding the property were assessed to the extent information were revealed in the course of researching the property itself. This included aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, city directories and historical topographic maps. The adjacent properties have similarly been open and vacant land in the past. Agriculture was conducted just west of the site from at least 1938. During the 1950's residential improvements were constructed on the adjoining properties and by 1959 no agricultural use is noted on the surrounding properties. The gas station to the west appears in 1985 and the school to the north between 1994 and 2006. Groundwater Conditions The specific depth of groundwater occurrence at the site could not be determined through the scope of our work and likely fluctuates seasonally. In general, groundwater occurs within the alluvial sediment and is recharged seasonally from mountain streams to the north. The static water table below the site is likely on the order of more than 300 feet below the ground surface considering the regional topography, physical properties of the sediment, and distance to mountain streams. The direction of groundwater flow is south, concurrent with the natural topography. 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The field reconnaissance was performed on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental RGS Engineering Geology P e Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 conditions in connection with the property. The property was visually and physically observed from all adjacent public thoroughfares and by traversing it in order to observe the existence of or potential indications of the present and past uses, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum products, above and underground storage tanks, odors, pools of liquid, drums and other containers, potentially PCB-containing electrical and hydraulic equipment, fuel sources, stains and corrosion of structures and equipment, drains and sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil and pavement, stressed vegetation, solid waste, trash, construction and demolition debris, mounds and depressions suggesting disposal, waste water or other liquid or any discharge into a drains, ditches, underground injection systems, or streams, wells, and septic systems and any other notable conditions which would indicate a recognized environmental condition in connection with the property. The western portion of the site exists as open, vacant land. The eastern portions are currently occupied by homes and were not accessible. Considering the size of the property, our methodology for site reconnaissance included review of government database lists, examination of aerial photographs, followed by site inspection of potential environmental conditions identified. The interior of the residence was not observed nor is inspection of the residence considered necessary as it is reportedly used solely for residential purposes. There were no other physical limitations or inaccessible site areas noted during our site visit. 6.2 General Site Setting The site is located along Arrow Route which exists as an improved, four-lane road. The property supports single-family residential development with no commercial or industrial operations. Topographically the site area is rather flat with a uniform gradient to the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south and is collected along storm water improvements associated with Arrow Route. Photographs of the site are presented in Appendix B. RGS Engineering Geology AR Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 6.3 Exterior Observations Observations Identification Comments Indications of the present and past uses, No treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum roducts Aboveground storage tanks No Underground storage tanks No Odors No Pools of liquid No Drums and other containers No PCB-containing equipment Yes Pole mounted transformer Fuel sources No Stains No Corrosion of structures and equipment, No Drains and sums No Pits No Ponds No Lagoons No Stained soil and pavement No Stressed vegetation No Solid waste, trash, construction and demolition Yes Various domestic trashes. debris Mounds and depressions No Waste water, liquid or discharges No Underground injections stems No Streams No Wells No Septic s stems No Other No 6.4 Interior Observations The on-site homes are reportedly used for residential occupancy only. Accordingly no observation of the home interior is considered necessary or was conducted as part of this phase I. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with Owner Considering the open, vacant, and residential land use dating back to the 1950's, interviews with the site manager and owner were not considered necessary. Information regarding the environmental conditions of the property and mandatory State disclosures will be provided by the owner as pertinent. RGS Engineering Geology AR Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 The owner provided no information relative to recognized environmental conditions associated with the property. The owner is not aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; and any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. No other recognized environmental conditions were indicated by the owner. 7.2 Interview with Site Manager No site manager is associated with the property. 7.3 Interview with Occupants The owners representative (Alan Smith) was contacted via telephone and reported no environmental impact to the site. The property has been used for residential purposes since the 1950's according to records search and phone discussion with the tenant. 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials Interviews were attempted with state and local government officials to obtain information that may indicate recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property. A reasonable attempt was made to interview staff of the following agencies: • The local fire department (Corona Fire Department) • Riverside County Department of Environmental Health • Riverside County Department of Land Use Services • Riverside County Solid Waste Management • California Regional Water Quality Control Board • City of Corona building permits. No pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was obtained from these agencies. 7.5 Interview with Others No other pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was ascertained from interviews or discussions with others. RGS Engineering Geology ARd Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 8.0 FINDINGS The following recognized environmental conditions were identified: • Asbestos containing materials and/or lead paint may be present within the structure based on the age of construction. This condition should be evaluated by a qualified professional prior to demolition. The following historical environmental conditions were identified: • No historical recognized environmental conditions were identified in addition to the aforementioned issues. The following de minimis conditions were identified, but are not considered recognized environmental conditions for reasons explained below: • Localized domestic trash on-site. 9.0 OPINION In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject site is considered low. Localized domestic trash and organic debris does not constitute a significant environmental impact to the site. The potential for asbestos containing materials and lead paint should be evaluated prior to demolition of the existing residence. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable site conditions are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. No significant data gaps that affected our ability to recognize environmental conditions were encountered. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 for the Property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Section 11.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property with the possible exception of asbestos containing materials and lead paint to be evaluated by others. RGS Engineering Geology ARd Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 No additional recognized environmental conditions were noted through the scope of this study and no further action, other than described above, is considered necessary at this time. 11.0 DEVIATIONS No deletions, deviations, or other limitations to the standard of practice were imposed as part of our assessment. 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES No additional services are recommended at this time with the exception of asbestos and lead paint evaluation to be conducted prior to demolition of the building. 13.0 REREFENCES American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1527-93., pp 1-24 American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Transaction Screen Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1528-93, pp 25-55. ASFE, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments„ Second Edition, 1995 Carson, Scott E. And Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) This Phase I report has been prepared by the undersigned RGS Engineering Geology, Principal Engineering Geologist licensed in the State of California. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely; RQ&Engineering Geology Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 ki'ncipal Engineering Geologist RGS Engineering Geology )39�e Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. The resumes of professionals involved in the collection,/analysis, and reporting of environmental data for this report are provided in App nI'x'16.9 fore iew. C i tophe Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Principal gineering Geologist RGS Engineering Geology MRe Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.0 APPENDICES RGS Engineering Geology ARd Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.1 Site Location Map RGS Engineering Geology Page I Page 617 6/14/2018 Google Maps Go gle Maps SITE LOCATION MAP- Figure 1 En Yff gh School Paul V 7 ETIWANDA GRAPE LAND UP1.4d H,lk o? Ml LDII Hlghl�llll tourahy Cerra'al Pork 6-- F'0xl Al—103A 0 RW Hill P.. Z Catle Al—t WEST END Vr The Eacl- -h.E l.LOS OLWOS. RWHHIC.11ryCl�q 7.—V—T—E— 9 ,J F. COLLEGE R.—h. U,I.,d High&l.1 9 1 C—....g. W enm aouw wanmv Hvry �. WMwv srrm, v l.rwvgeaee A oleo awe £ rn.aver Nrn arinv arras acute Mron qun -h. Upland U.— DMv Cl PFwaa U.P-y ..RT.'U GAMONDA ..l.i, m-0h*—lUMhVD--HM 1.7 6mll z wow mho a�,emlaw H,h School JDh. b li'll9C"I.S.l"P Vbulbn Cen1w—wo B 1 N, C-1 GUASTI DELL RACIVO f ..UT..— DUSTRIAL PARK ..'04 c 9 Y c gle GATEWAY Map data @2018 Google 2000 ft 1 Page 618 https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0974207,-117.5923378,14z 1/1 Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.2 Site Plan RGS Engineering Geology Page I Page 619 EXISTING SCHOOL REVISIONS EXISTING ACCESS ROAD 2V BOX MULTI-TRUNK ' CAMPNEATREEED, OC fSTAGGEREo1 128 G4 10 o � 0 a I, .LANDSCAPE0',-, - � -p of=m EUSRNGPARKINGLOT. j WNW c 5 EXIT Z m DRIVEWpm o a0. TRAsw ro NN I REC/ClE 186 . ' LAND.RBPPE. I ; ADA ACCE$3 f0 RED — CARW I_n c O yo - s OWE. N Y y Q pUp mZ o L8 q 2 7vq, 3u43 a3u+G r�Na . Q^ 0 ➢ I. FIN..SERVICE p o DHNE STATION J. n Q 5114 11W 11'-Ia° 5'-6 V`. m I I L DUAL CENTER 19 20' (-•-- U4 EXISTING - 2'..1421ISO.1U. NOT A PART 'LS n -•- OFNE �J M�,�•��,. O N ESCAPE, fOUNTNN •J PGS,. I CONOGN DPdVE _ • EN ARRTNEO POS„ ENTRANCECE R 'Q in LG. MONU SIGN r LANDSCAPE V .. .. .. NMAPPROIACH .144 REMOVE REMOVE 9TS0 9m PERCRTSTDS EXISTING EXISTING APPROACH APPROACH N ARROW ROUTE R 5 1'-20 SUMMARY (9744,9760 ARROW ROUTE) ` BUILDINGS(COMBINED)FOOTPRINT 5867 SOFT. LANDSCAPING(25%) 15,455 SOFT. CONCRETE 40,766 SOFT. u•I.1"=20' SITE TOTAL(1.42 ACRES) 68,088 SO.FT.' PARKING � T bor VACUUMS 33 STALLS Page 62@AR WASH •_� CUSTOMER/EMPLOYEE 15 STALLS EXPRESS SITE PLAN - LOADING(14!X27') , 1STALL DI s— uva uuwwm �R90ft �r"ml0' REVISIONS BY _a i(n1 9p1 TUNNEL N C D � 0 a EQUIP. OM Bfl�N OFFICE b RO Rry, PVRi..RM '.OFFICE NI I f ..._ N 12101 I5m�o" FIRST FLOOR PLAN N 9SOFT. 5865SQ.Ff TOTAL ,. I N I L-1 a � OFFICE EQUIP RR _ ❑0 15�=0 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 14M SQ.FT Ire' -CONCRETE'. • RECESSED TILE ROOF CORNICE STUCCO CONCRETE. TILE ROOF STUCCO ''I I_.I VEN ER LJ Dale . STONE DECORATIVE IATiICE Rn. — ENTER Self l Ell Ire' VENEER 1219MWMM COVER DECORATIVE WEST ELEVATION 4XI2DOORS STONE SOUTH ELEVATION °e"" VENEER JaN Page 621 .R 2 Ire' of sn..l. REVISIONS BY RECESSED CONCRETE TILE ROOF CORNICE —PRCN CONCRETE TILE ROOF CONCRETETILE ROOF .• STUCCO - �rf{rye STONE II 1' STUCCO VENEER EXIT DECORATIVE IATTICE DECORATIVE ET -STUCCO a12 DOORS .COVER 12VWLUMNS 4X12 DOORS NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION CONCRETETILERCOF CONCRETE TILE ROOF L 9 COVER 'LATTICE LATTICE COVER B UCCO DECORATIVE �V.'.; CI $1U000 122VVCOWMNS 12$COIUMNS �I ' -I a .ECORATNE STONE STONE JO DETAILCENTER = 4X12 MR VENEER VENEER 7 1428SO.FT. 0 V _ V SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION O �.ftR OFFICE - N CONCRETETILE ROOF \ CONCRETE TILE ROOF 131-c IC.!, 131•0" —— (� stucco STUCCO �.. Sole Ire' Page 622-,,--' s SITE PLAN NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION DI 3 s.n N[a .aelsme : ARBOR log-o _ REVISIONS BY _RECYCLE j� ALUNAWDOD uuMAwooD ARSOR ARBOR SPUTFACEBLOCK IAISN Q IPAINTTOMATONSUI—G) BIN- BI TXROW qo — IATcH . MS'0 ppA APPNOVED 18GA.UMED.PRIMEO' CRANE BOLT IEVER HANDLE AND PLANTEDDSOX RIBBED STEEL GATES TRASNIRECYCLE PLAN SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION I/4° 2 lol-o� 2` NAWODD BOR � — a wRg FocE �J 0 VA Ul FA FYI El�1'�— --- Q � _ � _� DECORATIVE Q 121 COLUMNS ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ENTRANCE __— wPB Fi"C6 AWMAWWD : - _..ARSOR_... ENTRANCE ELEVATION ARBOR U4" END ELEVATION ARBOR q¢" 4'e 2'DECORATVEfj� M(COLUMNS 7 Wzel FA� PRELASr DECORATIVE— • — — CONCRETE CAP -- -- _ STONE VENEER PAY STATION m � n a � FAt6 0 Q • — Ro qu N To?_ ToP[95 V N I Z STONE D MTPIEJ 6'+M r IOI o' Z1 RDUARD VENEER Drr.n 14L0 aau Page 623 BNM ARBOR PLAN. PAY STATION PLAN FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION "j, nz. uFwuxry ARBOR Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.3 Site Photographs RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 Page 624 - - � J:�:;. r :�•ram y r Page 625 Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.4 Historical Research Documentation RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 Page 626 Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: 5324295.5 June 11, 2018 ILnor,--- ire EDR Aerial Photo DecadePackage 6 Armstrong Road,4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 E D R� Toll Free:800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Page 627 EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/11/18 Site Name: Client Name: Arbor Carwash RGS Geosciences 9744 Arrow Route 1225 Chestnut Street CEDR Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91731 UPLAND, CA 91784 EDR Inquiry# 5324295.5 Contact: Christopher Krall Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR)Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source 2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1994 1"=500' Acquisition Date: June 01, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500' Flight Date: August 03, 1989 USDA 1985 1"=500' Flight Date: July 28, 1985 USDA 1975 1"=500' Flight Date: August 01, 1975 USGS 1966 1"=500' Flight Date: April 16, 1966 USGS 1959 1"=500' Flight Date: October 16, 1959 USDA 1953 1"=500' Flight Date: February 02, 1953 USDA 1949 1"=500' Flight Date: May 21, 1949 USDA 1938 1"=500' Flight Date: May 27, 1938 USDA When delivered electronically by EDR,the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources,Inc.It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources,Inc.All rights reserved.Reproduction in any media or format,in whole or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,or its affiliates,is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.or its affiliates.All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. age 628 5324295 - 5 page 2 a I .. _ — �:e— �' � - r k. •� 1 ..rl l�S-� p7p 1 1 1 Y� l Y _ 'n'} �r - mr, :� W�'�•' ., it �.iL _ �— •.•- Iri!. Edi or, It In 77 411 s_ r 01 ig 6J CA �-' L>: ` � +' � 'ti� ![. r�"Sys" I II�� I ❑ i'� M 1� c en � _ � a�y� OVA -Asl'Norio all ��. � �� — .� -#•.'I `- >� ��� I r� ,� ;�L Y1���1 a4T�l�V� -)•Y L _+. , - �'.� - III..Ir1' 1 '' ,Il � � -1� !'�4 Y•�F �I � � ��I , l',1 I �, ` _' '�' .�t _F� '•f I Y r i'f;ti` ��� •'� 7�-.� Ip �'`�+ ' z- 4 Inn'I�r� '•,.i.'1' ,YiT 7t41 I+�,. i �A -4 4 I At _.I •''- sd Ir_1�',,,. ,� I �+ -...p , r wI '! L l I ��..M f�W I' J� _ ±va .� 1 11'lai�`I I I ♦ - jjIq di Ito I .I • E lf K- pi OWL it ly 1 r e l - 1 s _ I I LL I j - i I f ' I _ iF{ - - � � � � I ,..., �1 I• Z �--�-.-���-� it � Li - -•:, - "- ti. -.ram ��- _� _ y11��rMVr - ..rM�—.r1�Arr. � e...w► w i �• lip oil Air As lk - �'+ may,. '� _ � � I �'• � �rr'' �-� �� � '• `, � � .�1�'.i 7' Ito c fit fit Or JI 3 INQUIRY#:5324295.5 NMI Ty. YEAR: 2012 1 . ` Wb rp dWD UL in : + r � JJam' ��T� �� �•� � -•� 'E I 'a a. ' �' 1 r ' �, r • '47 t R - I, 1 Am Is AN Im or IL 1'�- s r Plan tits 7 .Ifs wf l 7 ,a _ .Ali"a. at Irits -.4 Ir URI � or dft Ar �• t •: • , ' fir! .c Tr r •• � I y � R- • a r.ro —--s —_...f _ • ss s .�a�...�' tip+-- � -i •i-` cv►• s • • .,.. -_ ` � • ., .� --mow■ -... lot AIL 1p YA r 'ANIAM.! ,t J _,��, !lam ..� �• A'Uri OOP jr ..� . ' fl + +• { AV I••' ..� ��•� � - • , '�. •� r � ��:.� *� � `: ',-ra. � OMAP ., �. _ .fir �.-• "' 91 t• r ti..01 i II 11 LN i __._�.�. � ems.-.�_�. %..: 1 .`�y �� 1•- ! � _. .��i.''..., �:��'�� c �t� �� �.-• ? • N AL '4* A 1 ' .• --,+�, � arm' � r !'Y�'�'.� L i r R . •a . x+t40, ba t i _Aft 111M urn _ -�i . • ;;ii is � .... . ' . • �c.. r�+wi�.ri���ar a�ij.. �•': �`'`►T•i•♦•w� � • � lfil INQUIRY#:5324295.5 yr ..* •ti J � ' YEAR: 1994 (rEDR' :� � ;' zr�•�-�. �� �,} _s Page 633C AIL_J - - . - •+ 7T �'— nor -� - - .. - room r - . . 1� , e ti r c•. 1 tot �I ■ s �, 10 ;pot wig ' •�el� a■ -. Fn F- cal v''D I.. -fir+• d .� �_L' I�• �+ , ... � '. VA = N '�• r --Irs {S�� iaYa }mr :. i Ali WIN IR .. � . 11 •� �--- [ �► - • • r JJJIII.��� J.' l - * I 1 R • 1. 7 �. �� � • } L � �Yr �� tO' • 4 r� t `� I I �r • R � t a • � � r 41 41 lip- 40 All— It ilk .e IL s•a�.�. . INQUIRY#:5324295.5 •' +' � - a 1 YEAR: 1985 ■ .. 4ea-.ti t+� (rEDR �. t) Page 6 6' • •�� ►� IP �- - ' ��. � *ti pia � � w `�?' `- �„rs��'�:.�;•,,,. -� - t • Alt 41 •� :pia k � j ,?• -. - • d, of t ..: ..11 qjj I if 97 7-77777 - 1 � ' 1 ♦ 4 ..,,yR:. ^:_^..�•m�il�+mml �.._,'._... ..._- f r .,z�+. ':. r�$,::we::�a;a�c • � yf `'� y� 1 t�. 6 1•i f• wli z r r'e � r ; 1 F�• r4 M * r r �� 3 r w9 n_ I h i a - �Y i 10 IA 411 Ir � g r 7 - } • ' a b ' � f ..,.,..«ram_.--....�..-...,,�, � I ".__ 1 Y�A'^^•'.^.^^ i'+�— 5 ^..� �- „ __ - .. • ^ 'ram _._ f r i !{} .� •'"r� i �Ij Jet,`, ���',��� :l fE brr'�', ._ ♦ f r'� /t a t+ !,1� _ �. � ip .iG ,��.��y. Ee "7 "���`� ` r•�^f••., �— 2�21 fit �=Zt�I t kf,�t* ' OA r r� _ � e QuipNoll JI +# g ti. f _ ..qr�...�+ter. ;t!"irr G.f f{��♦-�,�'+ ±� t��,�. ,�.�.� ri ^ .� {' INQUIRY#:5324295.5 YEAR: 1959 (FEDR gI Page 638 =500' - d ' f r' -C VA; p Ftr�q� F-1 7 I I MIL - - _ !: 4 All .ZI •�����j+=lii�i y t ......... . . : . ::*A�i1.i�lr.`1 I�.:f S •!i �E ±�H� - ..:.�i;iiS.lh� �i , i 3µ •� — I ,t J ...� .fir :21: ;?:cs:i iii f �i •• f ,+A a i.� mL a .r INQUIRY#:5324295.5 IJr YEAR: 1953 dM_ w =500' (rEDR _ `•— .+ Page 639 iii .'�� � :� 1 'L MQ�' I .NZ�•M�-.ZKZ .�, .M H•ia•rK S' �,�' j !js• ��- �i� •�.)� >1pp.b 2 i ..� I' •r .••s•r,. ••s•♦.M •r.M::.: ,, .. .:ram. • 9 �i' '��'� :�: ,. _ ���,�'� •.., r~fir ► . i}=L............... Y2::•..;.::YS: —-.--a6-— ii: '• 'si: :eE•3•s..:.tt:itis::r, t.i '� �,_��, .z.,ti:-:•`as•r. �?e`s•38.1�: a r, may.• is ..:t ♦ • ••i .... . � ••• •ar r .. ..1,_.,�,•.'Yh57• _ .Ma a ryi rN��M� rf.N•� •1!• ►Y.+M. �' ra� � : '•aM .:M•+.� I•f �s�lY1fa�M I �M..ra«KM•-.+�i. :, _ E:.•..r�fµM'.s•r'• jl' .� .w.M.� M ! afl••M..,.•,-.. - I.. _ •�. •�yrM i /1•.�.♦•.•.1.f. i:.r•.Nr.f�:lY ••~ I f •MWss.!•,w` �:: :- - - M M fY'•• r.rr •1i•!� : •,r1 •.M...1.•.7 f, `w`.,w`w.:ruw\•�.r► .i I•:: . irM.ia.rr. : '. .0�G•t..�•I� -2 r'wwr�`»',:"�'M•.:.::::::: •ar:: K�i yid s '.\• 72+,.::. ... fir:,•¢ -' 2 ��M:itw.i•'�1rY.• :r: s.•;Z.a•':••Z.Y.1 •�., - :E::::•,.,y•:� :�� t , Ell. lie: ,:•• !r: y�•ttt ft��' ••••+�•is+a+w•wai: •• •• ••.J . . tii'M• :Y:S..'•. •�•: on;••♦.::: •. �... •::•. :::�it"i::iil r t:i":•.t:i:':�� :;�E"�~:•:: Y..:�!�E � ..:st.f:i.. :.:":;: :H�:::t µ::::� � ;;; 5:•:tt�:"r :^:�.".."':' �_�•.:..ii.•t :�:r. p::......_� i � .�! :'�' I31f:3:`t:� !«�'i'• .:SY♦i:!:: r:i { « Z1. ..ON!. •Z t♦ frZ �• •:Z`•,•i. ••Mr• .f♦Y♦.y.��i.�.••H�rq 1'�•• iM AlInMl4i •+i �i..�:: .aa.I 1' :. :�"�:�•: .:R.tS M....�� v?":•, •wPl '•- i ... ._ ::3't::IEr:::31LY3Y:Y3::��•�. t.1�:�1:: a<'I'n:'.�•4i •:: N `.♦ iS r'ttl:} r, } 3•......r ,..•t•::':':':;.:::T:::::;::_. ' ••MN • t•S:. •.. Lj=�Zr .`rE••••::::• •.•.ai iwt ......• it}` .tt• - :Y.i :•ia+�*.i� =S:}�Y' t'}�. .•tS, ii,j 3t..,.:.^:»•..•.• ' :wr.; j:• .Z'a�..�`` yy:.` rK: •a2Y."ar.a.. "..... :::_ "5:...Lei•: ':r................... 1• # r'fi:..►:. .»:••"ii: i i. «a:�::.`iai..t:Zi 3 r:::�. �;..,.:;:::_:: _ ;:; - 1.� �- w ii:i::,�«.. •1 .r t'..3 iHjjr. :.::.•..S:..... ••=t.::::E2::::::�:::'.,::: :c• •i a: �t•sIT s.:::..•::.,..... •:2: :T; t.P� • r••♦w.i:��.• : ••• ♦r.•: t.S•322t:}t�•�r�.i i::.:::::t?:i:: ::. �'.:., I...Ir. � � ...r..........•.... •L s �.• .t'.•,..; • i'r',,��..:.�:.i.,,�..:f rY.• Sti r• e�i• ti try fif tY.S=;1;'itt:, " • :�. Z' .,,ew.::.......;,. :i. =a'�.1':Y:tf� {• ni.j.''£��t�?:3:5'tti�•�::::�i�}i�ist 2,:+ •�• : .• Z� `i �;Y 7°•�'t�}'�. . .YS :L"tl.•::5,'.:::a::il".., :.�E.:7t: :'3. �w.r. • i . 3 ":l:La:::::::::.:.: E t:S'•" '•. :..t.:[L::'�L::'�.:�.:a.t:it:":.�''.••:'_... -•222 w••••:• T7 '��� • :: L=- 'I:.................... �= ::2`:tttr s': e..t.ir•�;:...h ,+ �••••'• •.isir ;iSi:aS S 1 •.• ,e.�15::'t:":'f.':arSS::'::3:::::.....:«:::......•.3...',#:i:::::. •�.�'r il. Y� •. } •r •. r.�� � SLR::::::T •r..•......'•.•.«t..,•. r: •�• tf !!..'::•r .�{ :i::: - :: e: :L.• 1 ::rL:••:.:'.:'."H'.:::::::` :::i:...... ..,••:� :: i. i. K . ._. ............ .•r........:L:i::�Y:: R i:..r::.at •a.. .•r ♦♦.;.. t •rS•� • 3S' .+ :: ...2Y ..............N.e.2. r{:,•:::::•. ..»•3. .i. ::: :. •: . ._ SLr .,.......u:..... ...•, ...................: s : r +`iii:iN •.•::! N.t \:• ;• •t`a Y:: ............. •.2.::�:` IWO ................ . .. air. �;..t; • : ?n:., .• i � •� ;1: i is E�•.:�ei �-•;i�-n• ... ' � ti3r �'�i •:.: ! E 'i,::i:r.�3:?;:l.�7 =.,:.ire;: ' t!} •r �_�} •i ;�• •t. .1. .'32iy 75..3�• T . ''�iS [ •# t _ :i.•t3t � � '� • -� >�� .. LS'y'11::tit:�, a Ls�itr- .�, L{�, •i �w i,ff{ ZiL:, •,}r• _ '��®q ..\/. i •i�\ �� ••a� _ <• ,..��..,'i CCC • �±2=�f >! � . �S �':_ � S'`'. 1-�: � i_+'f i � *i. I,y - � • r�, ,ii� . ti .1 'r} INQUIRY'#:5324295.5 £ ..y y• � � Ala �..! YEAR: 1949 Liat e #. .. r"€ y'at}1 .. :• } r :... CEDR` i; ; `` `y.t Page 640 ter` 4 S ::a•fr••• a•..• r.•w• • • .1N.•• ;f ••i: ..:.... ...... 1 ••••M.••♦ •1r N• ♦.w•. 1N � �. •aN•.• •. ooN••r•• N••• 19 •NN••1• •.•./• «•••N hh• N•N.••...N••N.••••r.••N•r•N •aprlhl Hr••h •q•N:• • 1••a•..to : NNw :.•.•.•••.••.• •.•. • r.• N./•••NN•a.S:.f.•• �� ••h•...... ...•N• • •.•N• •a..•=:N••••. ••••••• ••-••• .1•M•.•.r•Nr.••a•.•N unto ss 2•. : 1: ?; . r ;: 44 ::::::::::::::::::: • r :C�•a...t::....::S:i:S:::: It .::�'s:��.?6E3i �•••.' i ••a•=.• ..•S. 1� r.i�., •• •�t:::::i:: •• .a.• i..•. ....... . SI ri•, aai.:a Saa. • �...•�•a 1/a:'•••�.:.••e•::T;•;; '� + .. L.:..•.•. ;••••• ......... ........................ -•;:..... •. yb•••!s•l :i er3 :;;:_2.::.::?•:::. :....a .i r ::• : :::: • . :•: 00 :.:1a• N •N •.•NN .. 111111......• •N•a• .NN••}1•-1��••••. �•.1• _ :..N Nw. = 11 •1..•M .N N•.• {■e •••N1••S•N•M.••rr .•. N •r•f.N '•�• I�Ii •�•• to a, • •N.M. Np•N�. NFh .......N . N• . �•.• ♦ N•••N.•••1.1••f•. :S�•N. • N•/N :�::::• is ..• I••Z•• N -M•i• Y1: • ••M.H. •�. •:_••• : ♦ •••aNy•e� .24 •..:;N••.N•a•.•• w•. • I.•: � . W. 'N•r'iHi .•••••• N• N•NN.NNN.•.• _ •1•1�. -••'.::::: ............ .� •::••.. N.. 1M.•a•./• :ii�iii:. • N•,N •:::•. H. ...w: i�a ::.S.i•r.i.. L::;:::::i:t:.•: t •..•.• MW ..........1u.• :••.. •.• ::.: :�? i •S• ' „-• t .NI .......••.•.•.•.• •. '• t'4•f� !.`H ... we ......................:- _ ....�:. (• • •HN.wa•• ••` •.• S 1i •+ � L'� 2• Y- . .• •.::;... «..:•.............• -•-..� ::2: �.. i •S •� i:I:= . ...3 •..r".�r•.;:2: ....•.......•wH. .•.. • • ..:. i .�J1 ..� •.r'-,=«�"1�. .............. .. Si• •p ♦..:' � � j�a�'a 35::� , a:..•, war•?.•c •, • ..•.....w �. :.~::•�•:•..�.::.•..... £• '•:: .fir;,'-7 i _ �^'y C_9' • :.� � 'S12 i� i liSi:::�.. .i:.. :� .. :i LYr....••N...•..•-•'•tI•:i •'2�i: } t... _�• • ••. ••..�� •ice N• ♦ w.-.. -a N.w:i �isi::" :i••• r••/•N •• i�i=i: •.1'I22 • .::. •�'iiCS:iS2r.1i'�i+i�•} . . :••:�ui-Mu" •a r • :i 'ii�•r• w�1�.�Z::71.rS2•.SiI•S�•�,.L i •-4f: :•w.•::::.�w:. N../.••..a •.•Nr\,.. :1.•"F'ii.:i, :: w.. :'::a�i':'•::':'iwi;��� I� •.• w N.raa i:•.N .. •'�: i.•r.•.7•.S .i � S:.N.=:�•.• .•►.:\•.q.t:f NN••.:N- •: ::i:I�•:SI:iI:?io;;...•'..L:. �•w•:ii•'•.•,is . •.uwN•q•rNwYNp «iN•N,•:a :•::`. •pi iu:••i: ......:«:•.I•. •MHa• 5::.•• •••MN INa NNN•a•.. .h ISu.u.I u•u u. SL. w:i:i:rN r.• ::::. ••r• sN•H .NNr• '. ..il•'�.'S�T•.'••«:'::�': .•;..r•'2'iI�-' . .�; .. .N.•..........• - •::fir`: s3ic:e ..�.,?m�.. •!�j�• ::ua.NfwN• • •� : S •.•S.♦..•.•i' :L. ..11. :. �• ::fir•.. .m i .: . ::::.... � S.Z><... i'- i. •71i1t�r� 1 i •ia: 7:. i �1: SiiS >- 12: •. �:..:.. �.. :it :' t a. t. 'SSS 'Z: •. ,WV14 to �•2-Ss. .•.�.=5. . .ISM ........ p. .C�S'JS'C. 01. ... sue p' 'ss•; i.i: :::•.;..�i... Kai •w. :SSi.i7l•;• :. 7 S 22X!• �, ••`.fa •f:::::j.......... I N Q U I RY#:5324295.5 .......I:.:,.::.. N i • :� , YEAR: 1938 Page.641 (rEDR ;;.:.. =500' .............. ' Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: 5324295.3 June 07, 2018 Certified 11 Report 6 Armstrong Road,4th floor (rEDR� Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Page 642 Certified Sanborn® Map Report 06/07/18 Site Name: Client Name: Arbor Carwash RGS Geosciences 9744 Arrow Route 1125 Chestnut St CEDR Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91731 Upland, CA 91730 EDR Inquiry# 5324295.3 Contact: Christopher Krall The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by RGS Geosciences were identified for the years listed below.The Sanborn Library is the largest,most complete collection of fire insurance maps.The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley,Perris&Browne, Hopkins, Barlow,and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc.(EDR)is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC,the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives.This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Certification # 2C86-4BBA-BFCO PO# 1702-01 Project Arbor Carwash UNMAPPED PROPERTY Sanborn(@ Library search results This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, Certification#:2C86-4BBA-BFCO LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million were not found. fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris& Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: ✓ Library of Congress ✓ University Publications of America ✓ EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866 rM Limited Permission To Make Copies RGS Geosciences (the client)is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer.No one other than the client is authorized to make copies.Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive,the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies.This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client,its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy;a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources,Inc.It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources,Inc.All rights reserved.Reproduction in any media or format,in whole or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,or its affiliates,is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.or its affiliates.All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Page 643 5324295 - 3 page 2 Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.5 Regulatory Records Documentation RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 Page 644 Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: 5324295.2s June 07, 2018 The EDR Radius Map"' Report with GeoCheck@ 6 Armstrong Road,4th floor Shelton,CT 06484 (rEDR° Toll Free:800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Page 645 FORM-LBD-DCA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 OverviewMap----------------------------------------------------------- 2 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary 4 MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Orphan Summary 44 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking-------------------------- GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map------------------------------------------- A-5 Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------ A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC5324295.2s Page 1 Page 646 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 34.0996540-34'5'58.75" Longitude (West): 117.5924900- 1 17'35'32.96" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X(Meters): 445347.2 UTM Y(Meters): 3773169.2 Elevation: 1156 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: 5620426 GUASTI, CA Version Date: 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: 20140603 Source: USDA TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Page 647 MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.) ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION Al EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY#K DRYCLEANERS Lower 60,0.011,SE B2 MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE UST Higher 87,0.016,West B3 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-LQG Higher 87,0.016,West B4 MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST Higher 87,0.016,West B5 MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST,San Bern.Co. Permit,Notify 65 Higher 87,0.016,West B6 MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD SWEEPS UST,CA FID UST Higher 87,0.016,West B7 WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV EDR Hist Auto Higher 87,0.016,West B8 JOHN R HIX(14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD HIST UST Higher 87,0.016,West A9 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 107,0.020,SSE B10 HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW EDR Hist Auto Lower 168,0.032,WSW B11 MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR ENVIROSTOR,SCH Lower 230,0.044,WSW C12 CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST UST,CA FID UST,San Bern.Co.... Lower 367,0.070,South C13 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380,0.072,South C14 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380,0.072,South C15 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380,0.072,South 16 INSPIRON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 911,0.173,SSW 17 ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO ENVIROSTOR,VCP Higher 1914,0.363, East 18 PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS RCRA-SQG,LUST,SWEEPS UST,CA FID UST, FINDS,... Lower 2263,0.429,WSW 19 THRIFTY OIL#320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2505,0.474, NNE 20 INTER-METRO IND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE ENVIROSTOR,San Bern.Co. Permit Lower 2516,0.477,West 21 RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU ENVIROSTOR,VCP Higher 2944,0.558, North 22 AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET ENVIROSTOR, HIST UST Lower 3601,0.682,WSW 23 FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B ENVIROSTOR,VCP Higher 5032,0.953, NW 5324295.2s Page 2 Page 648 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL---------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY---------. Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS------------------Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA-Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries LUCIS------------------------ Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Page 649 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State-and tribal-equivalent NPL RESPONSE__________________State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC-------------------- Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST------------------ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfie/ds sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS____________________ Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI__________________________ Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register H IST Cal-Sites---------------- Historical Calsites Database CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL_____________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Page 650 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LIENS 2______________________ CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS----------------------California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90--------------------SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen/NLR RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD___________ _____ Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST------------ EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP_________________________ Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS________________________ PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System- FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act) MILTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA______________Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS___________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS____________ Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES________ Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC--------------- Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN________ Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste&Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EMI__________________________ Emissions Inventory Data TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Page 651 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENF-------------------------- Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE--------------------------. ICE HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES----------------------- Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC-------------------- Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS--------.Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List PROJECT-------------------- PROJECT(GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS(GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL&GAS (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO------------- NON-CASE INFO(GEOTRACKER) MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ------------Well Stimulation Project(GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT(GEOTRACKER) CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP-------------------- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Page 652 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EquaVHigher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0-1/8(0.016 mi.) B3 8 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR,and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page INSP/RON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE SSW 118-114(0.173 mi.) 16 23 State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR:The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund;Voluntary Cleanup;and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there are 6 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 114-112(0.363 mi.) 17 25 Facility Id:60002530 Status:Active RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU N 112-1(0.558 mL) 21 37 TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Page 653 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id:60002366 Status:No Further Action FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B NW 112-1(0.953 mi.) 23 41 Facility Id:60002569 Status:Active Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR WSW 0-118(0.044 mi.) B11 17 Facility Id:36010022 Status:No Further Action INTER-METRO/ND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE W 114-112(0.477 mi.) 20 35 Facility Id:71002573 Status:Inactive-Needs Evaluation AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET WSW 112-1(0.682 mi.) 22 40 Facility Id:71002437 Status:Inactive-Needs Evaluation State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact,water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0-1/8(0.016 mi.) B4 10 Database:LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version:02/14/2005 Facility Status:Case Closed Global ID:T0607101726 MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0-118(0.016 mi.) B5 11 Database:LUST, Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Status:Completed-Case Closed Global Id:T0607101726 THRIFTY OIL#320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 114-112(0.474 mL) 19 32 Database:LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version:02/14/2005 Database:LUST, Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Status:Completed-Case Closed Facility Status:Case Closed Global Id:T0607100225 Global ID:T0607100225 Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 1/4-1/2(0.429 mL) 18 27 Database:LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version:02/14/2005 Database:LUST, Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Status:Completed-Case Closed TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Page 654 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Status:Case Closed Global Id:T0607100092 Global ID:T0607100092 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST:The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EquaVHigher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0-1/8(0.016 mi.) B2 8 Database:UST, Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Facility Id:86009049 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP:Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 114-112(0.363 mi.) 17 25 Status:Active Facility Id:60002530 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites SCH:This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases,these properties may be listed in the CalSites category. depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the. environment they pose. A review of the SCH list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SCH site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE(ARR WSW 0-1/8(0.044 mi.) B11 17 TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Page 655 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id:36010022 Status:No Further Action Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0-1/8(0.016 mL) B6 13 Status:A Tank Status:A Comp Number:39175 Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-1/8(0.070 mL) C12 19 Status:A Tank Status:A Comp Number:8858 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 5 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page JOHN R HIX(14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0-1/8(0.016 mi.) B8 15 Facility Id:00000039175 Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-1/8(0.070 mL) C12 19 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-1/8(0.072 mi.) C13 21 Facility Id:00000054010 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-1/8(0.072 mi.) C14 22 Facility Id:00000056788 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-1/8(0.072 mi.) C15 22 Facility Id:00000008858 TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Page 656 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA FID UST:The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations.The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 2 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0-118(0.016 mi.) B6 13 Facility Id:36000337 Status:A Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-118(0.070 mi.) C12 19 Facility Id:36003408 Status:A Other Ascertainable Records DRYCLEANERS:A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries,family and commercial;garment pressing and cleaners'agents; linen supply;coin-operated laundries and cleaning;drycleaning plants except rugs;carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY#K SE 0-1/8(0.011 mi.) At 8 Database:DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST, Date of Government Version:03/16/2018 HIST CORTESE:The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list,as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 2 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. EquaVHigher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page THRIFTY OIL#320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 114-112(0.474 mi.) 19 32 Reg Id:083601836T Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 114-112(0.429 mi.) 18 27 Reg Id:083600858T TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Page 657 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Bern. Co. Permit: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division. A review of the San Bern. Co. Permit list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2017 has revealed that there are 2 San Bern. Co. Permit sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU IN 0-118(0.016 mL) B5 11 Facility Status:INACTIVE Facility Id:FA0004767 Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page CHINO BASIN MIND 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0-118(0.070 mL) C12 19 Facility Status:ACTIVE Facility Id:FA0016208 Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/23/2018 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page MOBIL#18-AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU IN 0-118(0.016 mL) B5 11 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV W 0-1/8(0.016 mi.) B7 15 Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW WSW 0-1/8(0.032 mi.) B10 16 TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Page 658 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry,wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE SSE 0- 1/8(0.020 mi.) A9 16 TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 Page 659 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There were no unmapped sites in this report. TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 Page 660 OVERVIEW MAP - 5324295.2S hurcl7sTT- / i 21 z /i—TE � I T F - a � —LIA R �. Arro W dr i - s La 9t h Si _ �_��j - — - —L—J _ I r ,8 W r,1, i.-0.,9�� N. -- T T 71 - 3 7 Gvv) I G Target Property I a I Miles Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA El Upgradient Area ♦ Sites at elevations lower than ° Power transmission lines Areas of Concern the target property 1 Manufactured Gas Plants 100-year flood zone National Priority List Sites 0 500-year flood zone Dept.Defense Sites 0 National Wetland Inventory State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information.The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Arbor Carwash CLIENT: RGS Geosciences ADDRESS: 9744 Arrow Route CONTACT: Christopher Krall Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 INQUIRY#: 5324295.2s Page 661 LAT/LONG: 34.099654/1 1 7.59249 DATE: June 07,2018 12:39 pm Copyright m 2018 EDR,Ina(c)2015 TomTom Rel 2015 DETAIL MAP - 5324295.2S Y L 4�• n. I� a P I a c e r U P_ I sIIGO � • ,�1� ._ ♦ _ 1r • � A I P q is S t !y AI P i n e St �F U 9F E 8TH 8 ARTS UJTIGNS,INr.Ca D+P •• t CP.S INC It' 'r-- - -- Sa I i na -- — ¢ i j - i yW WNIS MII•VCHIIIiCARI ' m 7. CFFIIQQCU GNGA VMC CUCA S 1 r CUNMCC N �� h UCAMO NTA RPPPPPP .I III I)CARP RS SJATESCH - • ,„ P I 4 �B Target Property o 1118 1is 114Miles Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA Areas of concern Sites at elevations lower than 100-year flood zone the target property 1 Manufactured Gas Plants 500-year flood zone r Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Dept.Defense Sites This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information.The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Arbor Carwash CLIENT: RGS Geosciences ADDRESS: 9744 Arrow Route CONTACT: Christopher Krall Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 INQUIRY#: 5324295.2s Page 662 LAT/LONG: 34.099654/1 1 7.59249 DATE: June 07,2018 12:51 pm Copyright 2018 EDR,Inc.( 2015 TonnTonn Rel.2015 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 >1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls/ engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 State-and tribal-equivalent NPL RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR 1.000 1 0 2 3 NR 6 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 2 0 2 NR NR 4 TC5324295.2s Page 4 Page 663 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 >1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CPS-SLIC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 UST 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 State and tribal Brownfie/ds sites BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste/ Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCH 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST 0.250 2 0 NR NR NR 2 HIST UST 0.250 5 0 NR NR NR 5 CA FID UST 0.250 2 0 NR NR NR 2 Local Land Records LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DEED 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 TC5324295.2s Page 5 Page 664 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted CHMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 LDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MCS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen/NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MILTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ABANDONED MINES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CUPA Listings 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 EMI 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ENF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HAZNET 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 TC5324295.2s Page 6 Page 665 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 >1 Plotted ICE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HIST CORTESE 0.500 0 0 2 NR NR 2 HWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 MINES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 San Bern. Co. Permit 0.250 2 0 NR NR NR 2 PEST LIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Notify 65 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1 UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 WDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 PROJECT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PROD WATER PONDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 OTHER OIL GAS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NON-CASE INFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MILITARY PRIV SITES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 UIC GEO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 WELL STIM PROJ 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SAMPLING POINT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 CIWQS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR Hist Auto 0.125 2 NR NR NR NR 2 EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 1 NR NR NR NR 1 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 -Totals-- 0 22 1 7 3 0 33 NOTES: TP=Target Property NR=Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5324295.2s Page 7 Page 666 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Al EXPERT CLEANER DRYCLEANERS S121693635 SE 9755 ARROW HWY#K N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.011 mi. 60 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relative: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: Lower Facility ID: 105454 Actual: Application Number: 304975 1154 ft. Permit Number: Not reported Status: O Representative Name: SY KYONG JO Representative Telephone: 909 4819626 Permit Status: Not reported BCAT Number: 000601 BCAT Description: DRY CLEANING, DRY-TO-DRY NON-VENT, PERC UTM East: 0 UTM North: 0 B2 MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 UST 0003784751 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 1 of 9 in cluster B Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 86009049 Actual: Permitting Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1156 ft. Latitude: 34.101006 Longitude: -117.591658 B3 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 RCRA-LQG 1007200051 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE CAL000050535 <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 2 of 9 in cluster B Relative: RCRA-LQG: Higher Date form received by agency:03/07/2004 Actual: Facility name: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 1156 ft. Facility address: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730-3662 EPA ID: CAL000050535 Mailing address: 12265 WEST BAYAUD AVE LAKEWOOD,CO 80228 Contact: JOHN HOOVER Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: 800-253-8054 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Large Quantity Generator Description: Handler:generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during any calendar month;or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month;or generates more than 100 kg of any residue or contaminated soil,waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill,into or on any land or water,of acutely hazardous TC5324295.2s Page 8 Page 667 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued) 1007200051 waste during any calendar month;or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month,and accumulates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time;or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil,waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill,into or on any land or water,of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month,and accumulates more than 100 kg of that material at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Owner/operator address: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 03/24/2002 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Owner/operator address: 3225 GALLOWS RD FAIRFAX,VA 22937 Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 03/24/2002 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste(haz.and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater,storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE TC5324295.2s Page 9 Page 668 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued) 1007200051 Historical Generators: Date form received by agency:02/28/2002 Site name: EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP Classification: Large Quantity Generator Violation Status: No violations found B4 MOBIL#18-AJ6 LUST S105774326 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 3 of 9 in cluster B Relative: LUST REG 8: Higher Region: 8 Actual: County: San Bernardino 1156 ft. Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: Not reported Local Case Num: 2001012 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: UNK Leak Source: UNK Global ID: T0607101726 How Stopped Date: 2/20/2001 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 2/20/2001 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 11/5/2001 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 0 Longitude: 0 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 TC5324295.2s Page 10 Page 669 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL#18-AJ6 (Continued) S105774326 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: IRS Staff Initials: JC3 Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 36000L Hydr Basin#: Not reported Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported B5 MOBIL#18-AJ6 LUST S100179548 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE San Bern.Co.Permit N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Notify 65 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 4 of 9 in cluster B Relative: LUST: Higher Lead Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Actual: Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site 1156 ft. Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607101726 Global Id: T0607101726 Latitude: 34.099656 Longitude: -117.593008 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 11/05/2001 Case Worker: JC RB Case Number: Not reported Local Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY File Location: Local Agency Local Case Number: 2001012 Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0607101726 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: JACKSON CRUTSINGER Organization Name: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Address: 620 SOUTH E STREET City: SAN BERNARDINO Email: jcrutsinger@sbcfire.org Phone Number: Not reported Global Id: T0607101726 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: ROSE SCOTT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB(REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET,SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513206375 LUST: Global Id: T0607101726 TC5324295.2s Page 11 Page 670 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL#18-AJ6 (Continued) S100179548 Action Type: Other Date: 02/20/2001 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0607101726 Action Type: Other Date: 02/20/2001 Action: Leak Stopped Global Id: T0607101726 Action Type: Other Date: 03/02/2001 Action: Leak Reported LUST: Global Id: T0607101726 Status: Open-Case Begin Date Status Date: 02/20/2001 Global Id: T0607101726 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 11/05/2001 San Bern.Co. Permit: Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0002338 Permit Category: HAZMAT HANDLER-UST ONLY Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0002345 Permit Category: HAZMAT HANDLER 0-10 EMPLOYEES(W/GEN PRMT) Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0002341 Permit Category: SPECIAL GENERATOR Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0011877 Permit Category: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT(PER UST) Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 TC5324295.2s Page 12 Page 671 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL#18-AJ6 (Continued) S100179548 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0011878 Permit Category: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT(PER UST) Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0004767 Owner: WESTERN FUEL GROUP Permit Number: PT0011879 Permit Category: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT(PER UST) Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 07/31/2004 NOTIFY 65: Date Reported: Not reported Staff Initials: Not reported Board File Number: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Discharge Date: Not reported Issue Date: Not reported Incident Description: Not reported B6 MOBIL OIL SWEEPS UST S101590945 West 8477 ARCHIBALD CA FID UST N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 5 of 9 in cluster B Relative: SWEEPS UST: Higher Status: Active Actual: Comp Number: 39175 1156 ft. Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-020967 Referral Date: 07-28-92 Action Date: 07-28-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: 333 SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-039175-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 1000 Active Date: 07-08-88 Tank Use: OIL STG: W Content: WASTE OIL Number Of Tanks: 4 Status: Active Comp Number: 39175 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-020967 Referral Date: 07-28-92 Action Date: 07-28-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: 334 TC5324295.2s Page 13 Page 672 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL OIL (Continued) S101590945 SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-039175-000002 Tank Status: A Capacity: 8000 Active Date: 07-08-88 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: REG UNLEADED Number Of Tanks: Not reported Status: Active Comp Number: 39175 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-020967 Referral Date: 07-28-92 Action Date: 07-28-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: 335 SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-039175-000003 Tank Status: A Capacity: 10000 Active Date: 07-08-88 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: LEADED Number Of Tanks: Not reported Status: Active Comp Number: 39175 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-020967 Referral Date: 07-28-92 Action Date: 07-28-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: 336 SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-039175-000004 Tank Status: A Capacity: 12000 Active Date: 07-08-88 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: REG UNLEADED Number Of Tanks: Not reported CA FID UST: Facility ID: 36000337 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: 00039175 Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 8477 ARCHIBALD Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported TC5324295.2s Page 14 Page 673 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL OIL (Continued) S101590945 NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active B7 WENTLAND MOBILE EDR Hist Auto 1020706997 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AV N/A <1/8 CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 6 of 9 in cluster B Relative: EDR Hist Auto Higher Actual: Year: Name: Type: 1156 ft. 1987 WENTLAND MOBILE Gasoline Service Stations 1988 WENTLAND MOBILE Gasoline Service Stations 1991 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations 1992 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations 1993 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations 1996 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts 1997 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts 1998 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts 1999 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts 2000 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts 2001 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC&REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts B8 JOHN R HIX(14-313) HIST UST 0001569289 West 8477 ARCHIBALD N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.016 mi. 87 ft. Site 7 of 9 in cluster B Relative: HIST UST: Higher File Number: 0002A273 Actual: URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002A273.pdf 1156 ft. Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000039175 Facility Type: Gas Station Other Type: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: 7149808440 Owner Name: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION Owner Address: 612 SOUTH FLOWER STREET Owner City,St,Zip: LOS ANGELES,CA 90017 Total Tanks: 0004 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 0333 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00001000 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 002 TC5324295.2s Page 15 Page 674 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number JOHN R HIX(14-313) (Continued) 0001569289 Container Num: 0334 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00008000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: PREMIUM Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 003 Container Num: 0335 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: REGULAR Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 004 Container Num: 0336 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00012000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: A9 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING EDR Hist Cleaner 1019947310 SSE 9755 ARROW RTE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.020 mi. 107 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: EDR Hist Cleaner Lower Actual: Year: Name: Type: 1153 ft. 2000 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs 2001 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs 2002 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs 2003 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs B10 HERNANDEZ JOHN R EDR Hist Auto 1020427704 WSW 9710 ARROW N/A <1/8 CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.032 mi. 168 ft. Site 8 of 9 in cluster B Relative: EDR Hist Auto Lower Actual: Year: Name: Type: 1154 ft. 1969 BARRENA MARTIN Gasoline Service Stations 1970 BARRENA MARTIN Gasoline Service Stations 1971 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1972 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1973 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations TC5324295.2s Page 16 Page 675 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HERNANDEZ JOHN R (Continued) 1020427704 1974 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1976 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1977 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1978 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1979 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations 1980 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations B11 MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER ENVIROSTOR S107736794 WSW ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARROW ROUTE SCH N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.044 mi. 230 ft. Site 9 of 9 in cluster B Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Lower Facility ID: 36010022 Actual: Status: No Further Action 1154 ft. Status Date: 04/19/2002 Site Code: 404252 Site Type: School Investigation Site Type Detailed: School Acres: 6.27 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program: Not reported Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: School District Latitude: 34.0999 Longitude: -117.5918 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: RESIDENTIAL AREA Potential COC: Chlordane DDD DDE DDT Lead Confirmed COC: 30004-NO 30006-NO 30007-NO 30008-NO 30013-NO Potential Description: SOIL Alias Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTER Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: SAN BERNARDINO CO.SUPT.OF SCHOOLS Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTR Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: 404252 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 36010022 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completed Date: 11/02/2001 Comments: Not reported TC5324295.2s Page 17 Page 676 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued) S107736794 Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completed Date: 05/13/2002 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Date: 04/19/2002 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Phase 1 Completed Date: 08/09/2001 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported SCH: Facility ID: 36010022 Site Type: School Investigation Site Type Detail: School Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Acres: 6.27 National Priorities List: NO Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Lead Agency Description: DTSC-Site Cleanup Program Project Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Site Code: 404252 Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program Status: Not reported Status: No Further Action Status Date: 04/19/2002 Restricted Use: NO Funding: School District Latitude: 34.0999 Longitude: -117.5918 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: RESIDENTIAL AREA Potential COC: Chlordane,DDD, DDE, DDT, Lead Confirmed COC: 30004-NO,30006-NO,30007-NO,30008-NO,30013-NO Potential Description: SOIL TC5324295.2s Page 18 Page 677 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued) S107736794 Alias Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTER Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: SAN BERNARDINO CO.SUPT.OF SCHOOLS Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTR Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: 404252 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 36010022 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completed Date: 11/02/2001 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completed Date: 05/13/2002 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Date: 04/19/2002 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Phase 1 Completed Date: 08/09/2001 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported C12 CHINO BASIN MWD SWEEPS UST S101618860 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 CA FID UST 0.070 mi. San Bern.Co.Permit 367 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C Relative: SWEEPS UST: Lower Status: Active Actual: Comp Number: 8858 1147 ft. Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-020130 Referral Date: 09-10-91 TC5324295.2s Page 19 Page 678 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued) S101618860 Action Date: 09-10-91 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: 3 SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-008858-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 5000 Active Date: 06-28-88 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: REG UNLEADED Number Of Tanks: 1 HIST UST: File Number: 00029BF0 URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00029BFO.pdf Region: Not reported Facility ID: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: Not reported Owner Name: Not reported Owner Address: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Not reported Total Tanks: Not reported Tank Num: Not reported Container Num: Not reported Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: Not reported Tank Used for: Not reported Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Num: Not reported Container Num: Not reported Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: Not reported Tank Used for: Not reported Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Num: Not reported Container Num: Not reported Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: Not reported Tank Used for: Not reported Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Not reported Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: CA FID UST: TC5324295.2s Page 20 Page 679 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued) S101618860 Facility ID: 36003408 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: 00008858 Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active Facility ID: 36003408 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: 00054010 Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: P O BOX Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active San Bern.Co. Permit: Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0016208 Owner: Verizon Wireless Permit Number: PT0036191 Permit Category: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1-3 CHEMICALS SPECIAL Facility Status: ACTIVE Expiration Date: 09/30/2018 C13 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI HIST UST 0001569274 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.072 mi. 380 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C Relative: HIST UST: Lower File Number: Not reported Actual: URL: Not reported 1147 ft. Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000054010 Facility Type: Other TC5324295.2s Page 21 Page 680 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI (Continued) 0001569274 Other Type: PUBLIC AGENCY Contact Name: D. PETERS Telephone: 7149871712 Owner Name: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI Owner Address: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE Owner City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Total Tanks: 0001 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 1 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00050000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Container Construction Thickness: 1/4 Leak Detection: Stock Inventor C14 CHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICT HIST UST 0001569275 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.072 mi. 380 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C Relative: HIST UST: Lower File Number: Not reported Actual: URL: Not reported 1147 ft. Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000056788 Facility Type: Other Other Type: PUBLIC AGENCY Contact Name: D. PETERS Telephone: 7149871712 Owner Name: CHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICT Owner Address: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE Owner City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Total Tanks: 0001 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 5 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00005000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Container Construction Thickness: 1/4 Leak Detection: Stock Inventor C15 MAIN OFFICE HIST UST 0001569296 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A <1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.072 mi. 380 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C Relative: HIST UST: Lower File Number: Not reported Actual: URL: Not reported 1147 ft. Region: STATE TC5324295.2s Page 22 Page 681 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MAIN OFFICE (Continued) 0001569296 Facility ID: 00000008858 Facility Type: Gas Station Other Type: Not reported Contact Name: JERALD C. ROGERS Telephone: 7149871712 Owner Name: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI Owner Address: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE. Owner City,St,Zip: CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Total Tanks: 0003 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: NUMBER 3 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00005000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Container Construction Thickness: 1/4 Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 002 Container Num: NUMBER 1. Year Installed: 1974 Tank Capacity: 00012000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Container Construction Thickness: 1/4 Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 003 Container Num: NUMBER 2 Year Installed: 1974 Tank Capacity: 00009000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Container Construction Thickness: 1/4 Leak Detection: Stock Inventor 16 INSPIRON CORP RCRA-SQG 1000347777 SSW 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE FINDS CAD107724254 1/8-1/4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 ECHO 0.173 mi. 911 ft. Relative: RCRA-SQG: Lower Date form received by agency:09/01/1996 Actual: Facility name: INSPIRON CORP 1138 ft. Facility address: 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 EPA ID: CAD107724254 Mailing address: ARCHIBALD AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Contact: Not reported Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: Not reported Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 TC5324295.2s Page 23 Page 682 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number INSPIRON CORP (Continued) 1000347777 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler:generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time;or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month,and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 415-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: OMNICARE, INC Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 415-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste(haz.and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater,storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Registry ID: 110002667123 TC5324295.2s Page 24 Page 683 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number INSPIRON CORP (Continued) 1000347777 Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate,transport, and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification,permit,compliance,and corrective action activities required under RCRA. Click this hTnarlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS:detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1000347777 Registry ID: 110002667123 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002667123 17 ALLMARK PLAZA ENVIROSTOR S121475143 East 10060-10080 ARROW ROUTE VCP N/A 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.363 mi. 1914 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Higher Facility ID: 60002530 Actual: Status: Active 1159 ft. Status Date: 08/15/2017 Site Code: 401793 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detailed: Voluntary Cleanup Acres: 2.19 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Program Manager: Amit Pathak Supervisor: Yolanda Garza Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program: Voluntary Cleanup Program Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Responsible Party Latitude: 34.09996 Longitude: -117.5854 APN: 0208-321-32-0000 Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 0208-321-32-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 401793 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002530 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number TC5324295.2s Page 25 Page 684 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued) S121475143 Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 11/13/2017 Comments: Signed and sent a copy to the RP. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Schedule Due Date: 03/23/2018 Schedule Revised Date: Not reported VCP: Facility ID: 60002530 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detail: Voluntary Cleanup Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Acres: 2.19 National Priorities List: NO Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Lead Agency Description: DTSC-Site Cleanup Program Project Manager: Amit Pathak Supervisor: Yolanda Garza Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Site Code: 401793 Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Programs Code: Voluntary Cleanup Program Status: Active Status Date: 08/15/2017 Restricted Use: NO Funding: Responsible Party Lat/Long: 34.09996/-117.5854 APN: 0208-321-32-0000 Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 0208-321-32-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 401793 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002530 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 11/13/2017 Comments: Signed and sent a copy to the RP. TC5324295.2s Page 26 Page 685 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued) S121475143 Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Removal Action Workplan Schedule Due Date: 03/23/2018 Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 18 PNEU DRAULICS INC RCRA-SQG 1000423885 WSW 8575 HELMS LUST CAD981370810 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 SWEEPS UST 0.429 mi. CA FID UST 2263 ft. FINDS Relative: ECHO Lower HIST CORTESE San Bern.Co.Permit Actual: CIWQS 1141 ft. RCRA-SQG: Date form received by agency:01/24/1986 Facility name: PNEU DRAULICS INC Facility address: 8575 HELMS RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 EPA ID: CAD981370810 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact address: 8575 HELMS RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 714-980-5366 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler:generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time;or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month,and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: PNEU DRAULICS Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 415-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 TC5324295.2s Page 27 Page 686 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued) 1000423885 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 415-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste(haz.and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater,storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found LUST: Lead Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100092 Global Id: T0607100092 Latitude: 34.097785 Longitude: -117.598866 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 05/23/1997 Case Worker: CR2 RB Case Number: 083600858T Local Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY File Location: Local Agency Local Case Number: 87031 Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Waste Oil/Motor/Hydraulic/Lubricating Site History: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0607100092 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: CATHERINE RICHARDS Organization Name: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Address: 620 SOUTH E STREET City: SAN BERNARDINO Email: crichards@sbcfire.org Phone Number: 9093868419 Global Id: T0607100092 TC5324295.2s Page 28 Page 687 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued) 1000423885 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB(REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET,SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824903 LUST: Global Id: T0607100092 Action Type: Other Date: 03/31/1988 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0607100092 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/23/1997 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0607100092 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 03/31/1988 Action: Not reported Global Id: T0607100092 Action Type: Other Date: 03/31/1988 Action: Leak Reported LUST: Global Id: T0607100092 Status: Open-Case Begin Date Status Date: 03/31/1988 Global Id: T0607100092 Status: Open-Site Assessment Status Date: 05/10/1988 Global Id: T0607100092 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 05/23/1997 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: San Bernardino Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083600858T Local Case Num: 87031 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Waste Oil Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: ETIT Cross Street: 9TH STREET Enf Type: CLOS TC5324295.2s Page 29 Page 688 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued) 1000423885 Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: LINK Leak Source: LINK Global ID: T0607100092 How Stopped Date: Not reported Enter Date: 5/10/1988 Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 3/31/1988 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 5/23/1997 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: 5/10/1988 Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 5/10/1988 GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Yes Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 34.0978012 Longitude: -117.5997403 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: VJJ Staff Initials: CR2 Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 36000L Hydr Basin#: UPPER SANTA ANA VALL Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported SWEEPS UST: Status: Active Comp Number: 9068 Number: 1 Board Of Equalization: Not reported Referral Date: 09-10-91 Action Date: 09-10-91 Created Date: 09-21-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 36-000-009068-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 1 TC5324295.2s Page 30 Page 689 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued) 1000423885 Active Date: 09-21-88 Tank Use: UNKNOWN STG: P Content: UNKNOWN Number Of Tanks: 1 CA FID UST: Facility ID: 36000278 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 8575 HELMS Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active FINDS: Registry ID: 110002683953 Environmental Interest/Information System California Hazardous Waste Tracking System-Datamart(HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators,transporters,and treatment,storage,and disposal facilities. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate,transport, and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification,permit,compliance,and corrective action activities required under RCRA. STATE MASTER C;lirrk f c;hgnarlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS:detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1000423885 Registry ID: 110002683953 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002683953 HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE TC5324295.2s Page 31 Page 690 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued) 1000423885 Facility County Code: 36 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083600858T San Bern.Co. Permit: Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0005354 Owner: PNEUDRAULICS INC Permit Number: PT0002353 Permit Category: SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR Facility Status: ACTIVE Expiration Date: 05/31/2018 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0005354 Owner: PNEUDRAULICS INC Permit Number: PT0002352 Permit Category: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 11-30 CHEMICALS Facility Status: ACTIVE Expiration Date: 05/31/2018 CIWQS: Agency: Pneudraulics Inc Agency Address: 8575 Helms Ave, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Place/Project Type: Construction-Commercial SIC/NAICS: Not reported Region: 8 Program: CONSTW Regulatory Measure Status: Terminated Regulatory Measure Type: Storm water construction Order Number: 99-08DW WDID: 8 36C352003 NPDES Number: CAS000002 Adoption Date: Not reported Effective Date: 05/27/2008 Termination Date: 06/29/2010 Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Design Flow: Not reported Major/Minor: Not reported Complexity: Not reported TTWQ: Not reported Enforcement Actions within 5 years: 0 Violations within 5 years: 0 Latitude: Not reported Longitude: Not reported 19 THRIFTY OIL#320 LUST S103950760 NNE 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD HIST CORTESE WA 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.474 mi. 2505 ft. Relative: LUST: Higher Lead Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Actual: Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site 1208 ft. Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100225 Global Id: T0607100225 TC5324295.2s Page 32 Page 691 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number THRIFTY OIL#320 (Continued) S103950760 Latitude: 34.106933 Longitude: -117.589509 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 05/06/1991 Case Worker: CR2 RB Case Number: 083601836T Local Agency: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY File Location: Local Agency Local Case Number: 91001 Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0607100225 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB(REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET,SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 Global Id: T0607100225 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: CATHERINE RICHARDS Organization Name: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Address: 620 SOUTH E STREET City: SAN BERNARDINO Email: crichards@sbcfire.org Phone Number: 9093868419 LUST: Global Id: T0607100225 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/06/1991 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0607100225 Action Type: Other Date: 09/06/1990 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0607100225 Action Type: Other Date: 01/30/1991 Action: Leak Stopped Global Id: T0607100225 Action Type: Other Date: 04/24/1991 Action: Leak Reported LUST: Global Id: T0607100225 Status: Open-Case Begin Date Status Date: 09/06/1990 TC5324295.2s Page 33 Page 692 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number THRIFTY OIL#320 (Continued) S103950760 Global Id: T0607100225 Status: Open-Site Assessment Status Date: 01/30/1991 Global Id: T0607100225 Status: Completed-Case Closed Status Date: 05/06/1991 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: San Bernardino Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083601836T Local Case Num: 91001 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Dispose-remove contaminated soil and dispose in approved site Cross Street: RAMONA Enf Type: CLOS Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Subsurface Monitoring How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: Overfill Leak Source: Other Source Global ID: T0607100225 How Stopped Date: 1/30/1991 Enter Date: 4/15/1991 Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 9/6/1990 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 5/6/1991 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 1/30/1991 Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 4/15/1991 GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: No Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 34.106796 Longitude: -117.5893911 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: TC5324295.2s Page 34 Page 693 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number THRIFTY OIL#320 (Continued) S103950760 Staff: CAB Staff Initials: CR2 Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 36000L Hydr Basin#: UPPER SANTA ANA VALL Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 36 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083601836T 20 INTER-METRO IND CORP ENVIROSTOR S110493943 West 9393 ARROW RTE San Bern.Co.Permit N/A 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.477 mi. 2516 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Lower Facility ID: 71002573 Actual: Status: Inactive-Needs Evaluation 1143 ft. Status Date: Not reported Site Code: Not reported Site Type: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Tiered Permit Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 41 Senate: 25 Special Program: Not reported Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 34.09940 Longitude: -117.6291 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD076053701 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 110000477573 Alias Type: EPA(FRS#) Alias Name: 71002573 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number TC5324295.2s Page 35 Page 694 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number INTER-METRO IND CORP (Continued) S110493943 Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported San Bern.Co. Permit: Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0003998 Owner: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LP Permit Number: PT0014569 Permit Category: EPCRA FACILITY Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 09/30/2006 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0003998 Owner: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LP Permit Number: PT0001582 Permit Category: HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR-51-100 EMPLOYEES Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 09/30/2006 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0003998 Owner: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LP Permit Number: PT0001580 Permit Category: CA ANNUAL FEE Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 09/30/2006 Region: SAN BERNARDINO Facility ID: FA0003998 Owner: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LP Permit Number: PT0001581 Permit Category: HAZMAT HANDLER 51-100 EMPLOYEES(W/GEN PRMT) Facility Status: INACTIVE Expiration Date: 09/30/2006 TC5324295.2s Page 36 Page 695 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 21 RC PLAZA ENVIROSTOR S118757317 North 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENUE VCP WA 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.558 mi. 2944 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Higher Facility ID: 60002366 Actual: Status: No Further Action 1224 ft. Status Date: 10/23/2017 Site Code: 401749 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detailed: Voluntary Cleanup Acres: 3.38 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Program Manager: Xihong(Scarlett)Zhai Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program: Voluntary Cleanup Program Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Responsible Party Latitude: 34.10801 Longitude: -117.5925 APN: 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000, 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 1077-641-68-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-69-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-70-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-72-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-73-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-74-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-75-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-76-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-77-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 401749 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002366 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE TC5324295.2s Page 37 Page 696 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number RC PLAZA (Continued) S118757317 Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 07/07/2016 Comments: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Completed Date: 09/07/2017 Comments: Mailed annual cost estimate letter. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Date: 08/03/2017 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Technical Report Completed Date: 10/19/2017 Comments: DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Completed Date: 09/13/2016 Comments: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported VCP: Facility ID: 60002366 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detail: Voluntary Cleanup Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Acres: 3.38 National Priorities List: NO Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Lead Agency Description: DTSC-Site Cleanup Program Project Manager: Xihong(Scarlett)Zhai Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Division Branch: Southern California Schools&Brownfields Outreach Site Code: 401749 Assembly: 40 Senate: 123 Special Programs Code: Voluntary Cleanup Program Status: No Further Action TC5324295.2s Page 38 Page 697 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number RC PLAZA (Continued) S118757317 Status Date: 10/23/2017 Restricted Use: NO Funding: Responsible Party Lat/Long: 34.10801 /-117.5925 APN: 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000, 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 1077-641-68-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-69-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-70-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-72-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-73-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-74-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-75-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-76-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 1077-641-77-0000 Alias Type: APN Alias Name: 401749 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002366 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 07/07/2016 Comments: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Completed Date: 09/07/2017 Comments: Mailed annual cost estimate letter. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Date: 08/03/2017 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Technical Report Completed Date: 10/19/2017 Comments: DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination. TC5324295.2s Page 39 Page 698 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number RC PLAZA (Continued) S118757317 Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Completed Date: 09/13/2016 Comments: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 22 AVERY DENNISON-MPD ENVIROSTOR S110493657 WSW 9292 NINTH STREET HIST UST N/A 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.682 mi. 3601 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Lower Facility ID: 71002437 Actual: Status: Inactive-Needs Evaluation 1123 ft. Status Date: Not reported Site Code: Not reported Site Type: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Tiered Permit Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program: Not reported Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 34.09663 Longitude: -117.6038 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD050745363 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 71002437 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported TC5324295.2s Page 40 Page 699 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number AVERY DENNISON-MPD (Continued) S110493657 Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported HIST UST: File Number: 0002999E URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002999E.pdf Region: Not reported Facility ID: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: Not reported Owner Name: Not reported Owner Address: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Not reported Total Tanks: Not reported Tank Num: Not reported Container Num: Not reported Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: Not reported Tank Used for: Not reported Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Not reported Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: 23 FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS ENVIROSTOR S121475146 NW 9116 EAST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,SUITE 102 VCP N/A 1/2-1 RANCH CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 0.953 mi. 5032 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Higher Facility ID: 60002569 Actual: Status: Active 1219 ft. Status Date: 10/20/2017 Site Code: 401800 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detailed: Voluntary Cleanup Acres: 1.06 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Program Manager: Anantaramam Peddada Supervisor: Robert Senga TC5324295.2s Page 41 Page 700 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued) S121475146 Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Program: Voluntary Cleanup Program Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Responsible Party Latitude: 34.10765 Longitude: -117.6063 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: DRY CLEANING Potential COC: Tetrachloroethylene(PCE Confirmed COC: Tetrachloroethylene(PCE Potential Description: SOIL,SV, UE Alias Name: 401800 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002569 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 01/16/2018 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Site Screening Future Due Date: 2018 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Site Characterization Report Future Due Date: 2018 Schedule Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Phase 1 Schedule Due Date: 05/02/2018 Schedule Revised Date: Not reported VCP: Facility ID: 60002569 Site Type: Voluntary Cleanup Site Type Detail: Voluntary Cleanup Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Acres: 1.06 National Priorities List: NO Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SMBRP Lead Agency: SMBRP Lead Agency Description: DTSC-Site Cleanup Program Project Manager: Anantaramam Peddada Supervisor: Robert Senga Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Site Code: 401800 Assembly: 40 Senate: 23 Special Programs Code: Voluntary Cleanup Program TC5324295.2s Page 42 Page 701 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued) S121475146 Status: Active Status Date: 10/20/2017 Restricted Use: NO Funding: Responsible Party Lat/Long: 34.10765/-117.6063 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: DRY CLEANING Potential COC: 30022 Confirmed COC: 30022 Potential Description: SOIL,SV, UE Alias Name: 401800 Alias Type: Project Code(Site Code) Alias Name: 60002569 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Completed Date: 01/16/2018 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Site Screening Future Due Date: 2018 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Site Characterization Report Future Due Date: 2018 Schedule Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Phase 1 Schedule Due Date: 05/02/2018 Schedule Revised Date: Not reported TC5324295.2s Page 43 Page 702 Count:0 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) NO SITES FOUND TC5324295.2s Page 44 Page 703 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List(Superfund).The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program.NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas.As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:01/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC) Telephone:202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone:214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone:913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone:303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone:415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site,responds to the comments,and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:01/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980,the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version:10/15/1991 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/1994 Telephone: 202-564-4267 Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned �C�3242095.2s Page G R-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:01/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List(NPL)and Base Realignment and Closure(BRAC)sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version:11/07/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/05/2017 Telephone: 703-603-8704 Date Made Active in Reports:04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:92 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System)tracks hazardous waste sites,potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States.The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015.The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL)and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive �8932120R.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available.Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List(NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that.based upon available information,the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA-Treatment,Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: (415)495-8895 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA-Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: (415)495-8895 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly 7C'324299q.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA-Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: (415)495-8895 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA-Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: (415)495-8895 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version:02/16/2018 Source: Department of the Navy Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/22/2018 Telephone: 843-820-7326 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps,building foundations,liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version:02/13/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/27/2018 Telephone: 703-603-0695 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/29/2018 Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version:02/13/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/27/2018 Telephone: 703-603-0695 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/29/2018 Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7CU324295.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version:01/16/2018 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports:03/23/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/27/2018 Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly State-and tribal-equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation,either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version:01/30/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/31/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control's(DTSC's)Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's(SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further.The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites(National Priorities List(NPL)); State Response,including Military Facilities and State Superfund;Voluntary Cleanup;and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites,and provides additional site information, including,but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse,properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version:01/30/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/31/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF(SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active,Closed and Inactive Landfills.SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills.These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version:02/12/2018 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/14/2018 Telephone: 916-341-6320 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 7C'32420R.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside,San Diego,Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version:02/26/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region(7) Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/26/2004 Telephone: 760-776-8943 Date Made Active in Reports:03/24/2004 Last EDR Contact:08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report(GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank(LUST)Sites included in GeoTracker.GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact,or have the potential to impact,water quality in California,with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: see region list Date Made Active in Reports:03/21/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside,San Diego counties. For more current information,please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version:03/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region(9) Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/23/2001 Telephone: 858-637-5595 Date Made Active in Reports:05/21/2001 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2011 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region(8). For more current information,please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version:02/14/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region(8) Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/15/2005 Telephone: 909-782-4496 Date Made Active in Reports:03/28/2005 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency:Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono,San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version:06/07/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office(6) Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/07/2005 Telephone: 760-241-7365 Date Made Active in Reports:06/29/2005 Last EDR Contact:09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information,please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version:09/09/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region(6) Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/10/2003 Telephone: 530-542-5572 Date Made Active in Reports:10/07/2003 Last EDR Contact:09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations.Alameda,Alpine,Amador,Butte,Colusa,Contra Costa,Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno,Glenn,Kern,Kings,Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa,Merced, Modoc,Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento,San Joaquin,Shasta,Solano,Stanislaus,Sutter,Tehama,Tulare,Tuolumne,Yolo,Yuba counties. 7C'32420R.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:07/01/2008 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region(5) Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/22/2008 Telephone: 916-464-4834 Date Made Active in Reports:07/31/2008 Last EDR Contact:07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update:9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles,Ventura counties. For more current information,please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version:09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region(4) Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/07/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6710 Date Made Active in Reports:10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact:09/06/2011 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey,San Benito,San Luis Obispo,Santa Barbara,Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version:05/19/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region(3) Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/19/2003 Telephone: 805-542-4786 Date Made Active in Reports:06/02/2003 Last EDR Contact:07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations.Alameda,Contra Costa, Marin, Napa,San Francisco,San Mateo,Santa Clara,Solano,Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version:09/30/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region(2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-622-2433 Date Made Active in Reports:11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact:09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt,Lake, Mendocino, Modoc,Siskiyou,Sonoma,Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version:02/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast(1) Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/28/2001 Telephone: 707-570-3769 Date Made Active in Reports:03/29/2001 Last EDR Contact:08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota,Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version:10/12/2017 Source: EPA Region 8 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona,California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version:09/30/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 415-972-3372 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7C'32429q.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho,Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version:10/24/2017 Source: EPA Region 10 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version:10/14/2017 Source: EPA Region 1 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida,Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version:10/14/2017 Source: EPA Region 4 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version:01/06/2018 Source: EPA Region 6 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version:10/16/2017 Source: EPA, Region 5 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas,and Nebraska Date of Government Version:10/12/2017 Source: EPA Region 7 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases(GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites(CPS;also known as Site Cleanups[SC]and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups[SLIC]sites)included in GeoTracker.GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact,or have the potential to impact,water quality in California,with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:03/21/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7C'3242912s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:04/03/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region(1) Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/07/2003 Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date Made Active in Reports:04/25/2003 Last EDR Contact:08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:09/30/2004 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region(2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-286-0457 Date Made Active in Reports:11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact:09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:05/18/2006 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region(3) Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/18/2006 Telephone: 805-549-3147 Date Made Active in Reports:06/15/2006 Last EDR Contact:07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:11/17/2004 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region(4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6600 Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact:07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency:Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:04/01/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region(5) Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/05/2005 Telephone: 916-464-3291 Date Made Active in Reports:04/21/2005 Last EDR Contact:09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:05/24/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board,Victorville Branch Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/25/2005 Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date Made Active in Reports:06/16/2005 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually Pa3e24ALs Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/07/2004 Telephone: 530-542-5574 Date Made Active in Reports:10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:11/24/2004 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board,Colorado River Basin Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact:08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:04/03/2008 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region(8) Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/03/2008 Telephone: 951-782-3298 Date Made Active in Reports:04/14/2008 Last EDR Contact:09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation&Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC(Spills,Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup)program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges. Date of Government Version:09/10/2007 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region(9) Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/11/2007 Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date Made Active in Reports:09/28/2007 Last EDR Contact:08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency:Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version:05/15/2017 Source: FEMA Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/30/2017 Telephone: 202-646-5797 Date Made Active in Reports:10/13/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 136 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank(UST)Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board.These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No.92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No.2012-0061.These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. 7C'324R.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:03/08/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-327-7844 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites(GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: SWRCB Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-341-5851 Date Made Active in Reports:03/29/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version:07/06/2016 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/12/2016 Telephone: 916-327-5092 Date Made Active in Reports:09/19/2016 Last EDR Contact:03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:10/14/2017 Source: EPA, Region 1 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota, Utah,Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:10/12/2017 Source: EPA Region 8 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,Nebraska,and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:01/13/2018 Source: EPA Region 7 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies ��3e2A295.25 Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6(Louisiana,Arkansas,Oklahoma, New Mexico,Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version:04/24/2017 Source: EPA Region 6 Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/27/2017 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Date Made Active in Reports:12/08/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 134 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9(Arizona,California, Hawaii,Nevada,the Pacific Islands,and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:09/30/2017 Source: EPA Region 9 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10(Alaska, Idaho,Oregon,Washington,and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:10/24/2017 Source: EPA Region 10 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4(Alabama, Florida,Georgia, Kentucky,Mississippi, North Carolina,South Carolina,Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version:10/14/2017 Source: EPA Region 4 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5(Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version:10/16/2017 Source: EPA Region 5 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version:03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7 Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/22/2008 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Date Made Active in Reports:05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact:04/20/2009 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7C'32M.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version:07/27/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1 Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/29/2015 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2016 Last EDR Contact:03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 142 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version:01/30/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/31/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MCA Process. Date of Government Version:03/26/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/27/2018 Telephone: 916-323-7905 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/27/2018 Number of Days to Update:38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property,the expansion,redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance,pollutant,or contaminant.Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped,open land,and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions.A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community.Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA,as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version:01/19/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-566-2777 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update:21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System.WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units.WMUDS is composed of the following databases:Facility Information,Scheduled Inspections Information,Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information,SWAT Report Summary Information,SWAT Report Summary Data,Chapter 15(formerly Subchapter 15) Information,Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters,TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information,Closure Information,and Interested Parties Information. Pa3e24ALs Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:04/01/2000 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2000 Telephone: 916-227-4448 Date Made Active in Reports:05/10/2000 Last EDR Contact:05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: Department of Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3836 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version:02/08/2018 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/09/2018 Telephone: 916-341-6422 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version:12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Telephone: 703-308-8245 Date Made Active in Reports:01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact:01/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County,California. Date of Government Version:01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9 Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/07/2009 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Date Made Active in Reports:09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version:06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2004 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact:06/09/2004 Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version:04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health&Human Serivices, Indian Health Service Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2014 Telephone: 301-443-1452 Date Made Active in Reports:01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact:05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7CU324295.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version:02/22/2018 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 202-307-1000 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:71 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996,California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database.No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version:08/08/2005 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2006 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:08/24/2006 Last EDR Contact:02/23/2009 Number of Days to Update:21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases,these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version:01/30/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/31/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there,and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version:06/30/2017 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/18/2017 Telephone: 916-255-6504 Date Made Active in Reports:09/21/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites.TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version:07/01/1995 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/30/1995 Telephone: 916-227-4364 Date Made Active in Reports:09/26/1995 Last EDR Contact:01/26/2009 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations.The U.S.Department of Justice("the Department')provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by,for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. 7C'32M.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:02/22/2018 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 202-307-1000 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:71 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System.This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's.The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version:06/01/1994 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2005 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:08/11/2005 Last EDR Contact:06/03/2005 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version:02/28/2018 Source: Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 707-463-4466 Date Made Active in Reports:03/28/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version:10/15/1990 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/25/1991 Telephone: 916-341-5851 Date Made Active in Reports:02/12/1991 Last EDR Contact:07/26/2001 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version:04/19/2018 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/24/2018 Telephone: 415-252-3896 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database(FID)contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version:10/31/1994 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/05/1995 Telephone: 916-341-5851 Date Made Active in Reports:09/29/1995 Last EDR Contact:12/28/1998 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned Local Land Records 7C'320.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version:01/28/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA('Superfund')lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies.These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 202-564-6023 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:94 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions&Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed/Land Use Restriction.The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP)list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit.The list represents deed restrictions that are active.Some sites have multiple deed restrictions.The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program(HWMP)has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office.The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility(or part of the facility)has been closed or cleaned up.The types of land use restriction include deed notice,deed restriction,or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version:02/08/2018 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/08/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:02/08/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:0 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version:01/19/2018 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-366-4555 Date Made Active in Reports:03/23/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/27/2018 Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System.CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents(accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version:02/15/2018 Source: Office of Emergency Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/20/2018 Telephone: 916-845-8400 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually 7C'3212;Ls Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing(GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites(Landfills)included in GeoTracker.GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact,or have the potential to impact,water quality in California,with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing(GEOTRACKER) Military sites(consisting of:Military UST sites;Military Privatized sites;and Military Cleanup sites[formerly known as DoD non UST])included in GeoTracker.GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact,or have the potential to impact,water quality in California,with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:03/21/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases.Typically, they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version:06/06/2012 Source: FirstSearch Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:02/22/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013 Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version:12/11/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Telephone: (415)495-8895 Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version:01/31/2015 Source: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/08/2015 Telephone: 202-528-4285 Date Made Active in Reports:10/13/2015 Last EDR Contact:05/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin Islands. 7C'3212;12s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:12/31/2005 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: 888-275-8747 Date Made Active in Reports:01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact:04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by:Army Corps of Engineers,Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness,Wilderness Study Area,Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service,National Park Service. Date of Government Version:12/31/2005 Source: U.S.Geological Survey Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2006 Telephone: 888-275-8747 Date Made Active in Reports:01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact:04/11/2018 Number of Days to Update:339 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998,with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs.Currently the member states are Alabama,Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina,Oregon,South Carolina,Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version:01/01/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/03/2017 Telephone: 615-532-8599 Date Made Active in Reports:04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/15/2018 Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up,closure,and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version:01/11/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-566-1917 Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/27/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a"Watch List'to facilitate dialogue between EPA,state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred.Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected,but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA,state and local agencies-primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version:08/30/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2014 Telephone: 617-520-3000 Date Made Active in Reports:06/17/2014 Last EDR Contact:05/07/2018 Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe.This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action.The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites.Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up.Still others have not been fully investigated yet,and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. 7C'321A.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:04/22/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/03/2015 Telephone: 703-308-4044 Date Made Active in Reports:03/09/2015 Last EDR Contact:05/08/2018 Number of Days to Update:6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/21/2017 Telephone: 202-260-5521 Date Made Active in Reports:01/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System.TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/10/2018 Telephone: 202-566-0250 Date Made Active in Reports:01/12/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:2 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended(92 Stat.829)requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version:12/31/2009 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Telephone: 202-564-4203 Date Made Active in Reports:02/25/2011 Last EDR Contact:04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL(Superfund)site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 703-416-0223 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:94 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans ��3e21R.2S Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances.The Risk Management Program Rule(RMP Rule)was written to implement Section 112(r)of these amendments.The rule,which built upon existing industry codes and standards,requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program,which includes a(n):Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release,an accident history of the last five years,and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases;Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring,and employee training measures;and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care,employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies(e.g the fire department)should an accident occur. Date of Government Version:11/02/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Telephone: 202-564-8600 Date Made Active in Reports:12/08/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/20/2018 Number of Days to Update:21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version:04/17/1995 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/03/1995 Telephone: 202-564-4104 Date Made Active in Reports:08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact:06/02/2008 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version:10/25/2013 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Telephone: 202-564-6023 Date Made Active in Reports:10/20/2014 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators,transporters,commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version:06/01/2017 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/09/2017 Telephone: 202-566-0500 Date Made Active in Reports:10/13/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 126 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) program. Date of Government Version:11/18/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Telephone: 202-564-2501 Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly 7C'321A.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)lTSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA(Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version:08/30/2016 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/08/2016 Telephone: 301-415-7169 Date Made Active in Reports:10/21/2016 Last EDR Contact:05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update:43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version:12/31/2005 Source: Department of Energy Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/07/2009 Telephone: 202-586-8719 Date Made Active in Reports:10/22/2009 Last EDR Contact:03/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version:07/01/2014 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/10/2014 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:10/20/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/04/2018 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version:05/24/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Telephone: 202-566-0517 Date Made Active in Reports:12/15/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/27/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database(RADINFO)contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations for radiation and radioactivity. ��3e212A2S Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:01/03/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/04/2018 Telephone: 202-343-9775 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update:99 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records,it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version:10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: 202-564-2501 Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2007 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection&Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some EPA regions are now closing out records.Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version:10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: 202-564-2501 Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2008 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version:07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact:05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies CONSENT: Superfund(CERCLA)Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL(Superfund)sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version:12/31/2017 Source: Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups:Large Quantity Generators(LQG) and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version:12/31/2015 Source: EPA/NTIS Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/22/2017 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:09/28/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:218 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Biennially 7C'320.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version:12/31/2014 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2015 Telephone: 202-208-3710 Date Made Active in Reports:01/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/11/2018 Number of Days to Update:546 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP)in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.Atomic Energy Commission(AEC)operations. Date of Government Version:12/23/2016 Source: Department of Energy Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Telephone: 202-586-3559 Date Made Active in Reports:02/17/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/07/2018 Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills shut down,large piles of the sand-like material(mill tailings)remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low;however,in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version:06/23/2017 Source: Department of Energy Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Telephone: 505-845-0011 Date Made Active in Reports:11/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 703-603-8787 Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S.where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964.These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version:04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Telephone: 703-305-6451 Date Made Active in Reports:12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact:12/02/2009 Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned US AIRS(AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem(AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS).AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies.This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution,such as electric power plants, steel mills,factories,and universities,and provides information about the air pollutants they produce.Action, air program,air program pollutant,and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. �83e21A5.2S Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:10/12/2016 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: 202-564-2496 Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version:10/12/2016 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: 202-564-2496 Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version:01/25/2018 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/28/2018 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous(ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals,such as iron ore or molybdenum)and nonferrous(Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals,such as gold,silver,copper,zinc,and lead)metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version:12/05/2005 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/29/2008 Telephone: 703-648-7709 Date Made Active in Reports:04/18/2008 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines&Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version:04/14/2011 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2011 Telephone: 703-648-7709 Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining(primarily coal mining)is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).The inventory contains information on the location,type,and extent of AML impacts,as well as,information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems.The inventory is based upon field surveys by State,Tribal,and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version:12/20/2017 Source: Department of Interior Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2017 Telephone: 202-208-2609 Date Made Active in Reports:03/23/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:92 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly 7C'3212;Ls Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers'to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report:PCS(Permit Compliance System),AIRS(Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS(Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET(Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS(Federal Facilities Information System),STATE(State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS(PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version:02/21/2018 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/23/2018 Telephone: (415)947-8000 Date Made Active in Reports:03/23/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version:09/30/2016 Source: Department of Defense Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Telephone: 703-704-1564 Date Made Active in Reports:01/12/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies ECHO: Enforcement&Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version:01/13/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-564-2280 Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version:01/04/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/19/2018 Telephone: 202-564-0527 Date Made Active in Reports:04/13/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2018 Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80(Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs.All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version:02/20/2018 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/21/2018 Telephone: 800-385-6164 Date Made Active in Reports:03/23/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/23/2018 Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version:01/01A989 Source: Department of Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/27/1994 Telephone: 916-255-2118 Date Made Active in Reports:08/02/1994 Last EDR Contact:05/31/1994 Number of Days to Update:6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned 7C'3212;Ls Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CORTESE: "Cortese"Hazardous Waste&Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board(LUST),the Integrated Waste Board(SWF/LS),and the Department of Toxic Substances Control(Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version:03/26/2018 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/27/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/27/2018 Number of Days to Update:38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version:02/28/2018 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 925-454-2361 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/07/2018 Number of Days to Update:64 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO Cupa facilities Date of Government Version:04/20/2018 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/24/2018 Telephone: 415-252-3896 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: DRYCLEAN AVAQMD A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version:03/08/2018 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/13/2018 Telephone: 661-723-8070 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers.These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries,family and commercial;garment pressing and cleaner's agents;linen supply;coin-operated laundries and cleaning;drycleaning plants,except rugs;carpet and upholster cleaning;industrial launderers;laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version:03/27/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/29/2018 Telephone: 916-327-4498 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version:03/16/2018 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/20/2018 Telephone: 909-396-3211 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. 7C'324239q.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:12/31/2015 Source: California Air Resources Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2017 Telephone: 916-322-2990 Date Made Active in Reports:08/15/2017 Last EDR Contact:03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 147 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter,and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: 916-445-9379 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: 916-255-3628 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure,post-closure care,and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version:02/14/2018 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/16/2018 Telephone: 916-341-6066 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data.The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC.The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually,representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction,and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID,TSD ID,waste category,and disposal method.This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/12/2017 Telephone: 916-255-1136 Date Made Active in Reports:10/17/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections/Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version:02/20/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/21/2018 Telephone: 877-786-9427 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/23/2018 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste&Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board[LUST],the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS],and the Department of Toxic Substances Control[CALSITES].This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. 7C'32423912s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:04/01/2001 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/22/2009 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:04/08/2009 Last EDR Contact:01/22/2009 Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action("cleanups")tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version:02/20/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/21/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/23/2018 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California,unless specifically exempted,it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC.A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version:01/08/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/09/2018 Telephone: 916-440-7145 Date Made Active in Reports:02/06/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/11/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: Department of Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-322-1080 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program(MWMP)ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities(PDF)and Transfer Stations(PDF)throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version:02/27/2018 Source: Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2018 Telephone: 916-558-1784 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits,including stormwater. Date of Government Version:03/14/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-445-9379 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to:Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides;Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. �C-93242N.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:03/05/2018 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2018 Telephone: 916-445-4038 Date Made Active in Reports:04/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: Department of Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-323-3836 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version:03/23/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/27/2018 Telephone: 916-445-3846 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells,in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 916-445-2408 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites.The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region's active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version:04/15/2015 Source: RWQCB,Central Valley Region Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/17/2015 Telephone: 559-445-5577 Date Made Active in Reports:06/23/2015 Last EDR Contact:04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update:67 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version:06/19/2007 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/20/2007 Telephone: 916-341-5227 Date Made Active in Reports:06/29/2007 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version:07/03/2009 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/21/2009 Telephone: 213-576-6726 Date Made Active in Reports:08/03/2009 Last EDR Contact:03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies 7C'32423R.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites(GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies OTHER OIL GAS: OTHER OIL&GAS(GEOTRACKER) Other Oil&Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies PROD WATER PONDS: PROD WATER PONDS(GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies PROJECT: PROJECT(GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies NON-CASE INFO: NON-CASE INFO(GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SAMPLING POINT: SAMPLING POINT(GEOTRACKER) Sampling point-public sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies WELL STIM PROJ: WELL SAMP PROJ(GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans,a depiction of the monitoring network,and the facilities,boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features(oil and gas wells,produced water ponds, UIC wells,water supply wells,etc?)being monitored Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies �C�3242395.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CIWQS: The California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System(CIWQS)is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections,and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version:03/05/2018 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2018 Telephone: 866-794-4977 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:60 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies UIC GEO: UIC GEO(GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version:03/12/2018 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:12/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants(manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel.These plants used whale oil,rosin,coal,or a mixture of coal,oil,and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar(oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals),sludges,oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment.The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly,serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might,in EDR's opinion,include gas station/filling station/service station establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were not limited to gas,gas station,gasoline station, filling station,auto,automobile repair,auto service station,service station,etc.This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might,in EDR's opinion,include dry cleaning establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were not limited to dry cleaners,cleaners,laundry,Laundromat,cleaning/laundry,wash&dry etc.This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,but may not show up in current government records searches. �C_932423R.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version:N/A Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:01A3/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version:N/A Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:12/30/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 182 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program(oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills)and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program(soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version:01/09/2018 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/11/2018 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports:02/22/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version:04/05/2018 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2018 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: 7C'324239q.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version:03/01/2018 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2018 Telephone: 209-223-6439 Date Made Active in Reports:03/15/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version:04/21/2017 Source: Public Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/25/2017 Telephone: 530-538-7149 Date Made Active in Reports:08/09/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 106 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version:01/25/2018 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/26/2018 Telephone: 209-754-6399 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/26/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version:02/26/2018 Source: Health&Human Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 530-458-0396 Date Made Active in Reports:03/15/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank,hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version:02/22/2018 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/27/2018 Telephone: 925-646-2286 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: 7CU324295.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version:01/05/2018 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/2018 Telephone: 707-465-0426 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version:03/05/2018 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/08/2018 Telephone: 530-621-6623 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency.CUPA's are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program.The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version:03/01/2018 Source: Dept.of Community Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2018 Telephone: 559-445-3271 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: 830-934-6500 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version:03/05/2018 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/08/2018 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:04/30/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update:53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: 7C'32423R.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/26/2018 Telephone: 760-339-2777 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version:06/08/2017 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/09/2017 Telephone: 760-878-0238 Date Made Active in Reports:08/04/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/30/2018 Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites&Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version:02/02/2018 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/2018 Telephone: 661-862-8700 Date Made Active in Reports:03/28/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database.California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code.The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits,inspections,and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version:11/14/2017 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Telephone: 559-584-1411 Date Made Active in Reports:12/15/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:02/06/2018 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/09/2018 Telephone: 707-263-1164 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LASSEN COUNTY: 7C'32423R.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: 530-251-8528 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version:03/30/2009 Source: EPA Region 9 Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/31/2009 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Date Made Active in Reports:10/23/2009 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:206 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned HMS:Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version:01/16/2018 Source: Department of Public Works Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/23/2018 Telephone: 626-458-3517 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version:01/16/2018 Source: La County Department of Public Works Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/16/2018 Telephone: 818-458-5185 Date Made Active in Reports:02/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version:01/01/2018 Source: Engineering&Construction Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/01/2018 Telephone: 213-473-7869 Date Made Active in Reports:05/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version:01/01/2018 Source: Community Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/17/2018 Telephone: 323-890-7806 Date Made Active in Reports:02/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. �8_32429Ls Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:01/21/2017 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/19/2017 Telephone: 310-524-2236 Date Made Active in Reports:05/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/11/2018 Number of Days to Update:21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version:03/09/2017 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/10/2017 Telephone: 562-570-2563 Date Made Active in Reports:05/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version:01/04/2018 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/05/2018 Telephone: 310-618-2973 Date Made Active in Reports:01/18/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database.California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code.The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits,inspections,and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version:02/21/2018 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/22/2018 Telephone: 559-675-7823 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version:03/30/2018 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/06/2018 Telephone: 415-473-6647 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version:01/11/2018 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/12/2018 Telephone: 209-381-1094 Date Made Active in Reports:02/08/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies MONO COUNTY: ��302 22s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version:02/22/2018 Source: Mono County Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/27/2018 Telephone: 760-932-5580 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version:03/27/2018 Source: Monterey County Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/29/2018 Telephone: 831-796-1297 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version:01/09/2017 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/11/2017 Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version:02/22/2018 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/27/2018 Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date Made Active in Reports:03/29/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version:01/31/2018 Source: Community Development Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/01/2018 Telephone: 530-265-1467 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. �C_9321N.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:02/05/2018 Source: Health Care Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2018 Telephone: 714-834-3446 Date Made Active in Reports:04/03/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/07/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups(LUST). Date of Government Version:02/05/2018 Source: Health Care Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2018 Telephone: 714-834-3446 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/07/2018 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities(UST). Date of Government Version:01/02/2018 Source: Health Care Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/07/2018 Telephone: 714-834-3446 Date Made Active in Reports:03/28/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/08/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks,underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version:03/15/2018 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2018 Telephone: 530-745-2363 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/24/2018 Telephone: 530-283-6355 Date Made Active in Reports:03/15/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites(LUST). Date of Government Version:04/05/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2018 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly ��302 22s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version:04/05/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2018 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version:11/02/2017 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2018 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports:02/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update:33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site-hazardous material storage sites,underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version:11/02/2017 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2018 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports:02/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:11/01/2017 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:11/17/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators,hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators,and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version:11/30/2017 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2017 Telephone: 909-387-3041 Date Made Active in Reports:01/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: �C932M.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes:HE58-This report contains the business name,site address,business phone number,establishment 'H'permit number,type of permit,and the business status. HE17-In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates,violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated,the quantity,method of storage,treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler,and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List-Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County(underground tank cases, non-tank cases,groundwater contamination,and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version:03/05/2018 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/07/2018 Telephone: 619-338-2268 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version:10/31/2015 Source: Department of Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Telephone: 619-338-2209 Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2016 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:58 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego's jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases,open cases,and cases that did not have a case type indicated.The cases without a case type are mostly complaints;however,some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version:04/18/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/23/2018 Telephone: 858-505-6874 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version:03/23/2010 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/15/2010 Telephone: 619-338-2371 Date Made Active in Reports:07/09/2010 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version:09/19/2008 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/19/2008 Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date Made Active in Reports:09/29/2008 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. �C_9321N.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:11/02/2017 Source: Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date Made Active in Reports:12/19/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/02/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co.UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version:03/20/2018 Source: Environmental Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/22/2018 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update:43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version:11/16/2017 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Telephone: 805-781-5596 Date Made Active in Reports:12/18/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators,and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version:03/14/2018 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/20/2018 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version:03/15/2018 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/20/2018 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:06/06/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version:09/08/2011 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2011 Telephone: 805-686-8167 Date Made Active in Reports:10/07/2011 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: ��3021A.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:02/20/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/20/2018 Telephone: 408-918-1973 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies HIST LUST-Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks.This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version:03/29/2005 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/30/2005 Telephone: 408-265-2600 Date Made Active in Reports:04/21/2005 Last EDR Contact:03/23/2009 Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version:03/03/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2014 Telephone: 408-918-3417 Date Made Active in Reports:03/18/2014 Last EDR Contact:05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version:02/04/2018 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/06/2018 Telephone: 408-535-7694 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version:01/21/2017 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/22/2017 Telephone: 831-464-2761 Date Made Active in Reports:05/23/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version:06/15/2017 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/19/2017 Telephone: 530-225-5789 Date Made Active in Reports:08/09/2017 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SOLANO COUNTY: �C11324295.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version:03/08/2018 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/13/2018 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version:03/08/2018 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/13/2018 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports:03/29/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version:03/01/2018 Source: County of Sonoma Fire&Emergency Services Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/27/2018 Telephone: 707-565-1174 Date Made Active in Reports:04/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version:04/03/2018 Source: Department of Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/06/2018 Telephone: 707-565-6565 Date Made Active in Reports:05/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update:33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:02/06/2018 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/07/2018 Telephone: 209-525-6751 Date Made Active in Reports:03/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version:01/08/2018 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2018 Telephone: 530-822-7500 Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/31/2018 Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: �C932429 .2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version:01/26/2018 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/2018 Telephone: 530-527-8020 Date Made Active in Reports:03/21/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/25/2018 Telephone: 760-352-0381 Date Made Active in Reports:03/19/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version:03/19/2018 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/22/2018 Telephone: 559-624-7400 Date Made Active in Reports:04/17/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/16/2018 Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version:01/22/2018 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/25/2018 Telephone: 209-533-5633 Date Made Active in Reports:03/16/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan,Hazardous Waste Producers,and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan(B),Waste Producer(W),and/or Underground Tank(T)information. Date of Government Version:12/26/2017 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/25/2018 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports:03/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/23/2018 Number of Days to Update:48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned,and Inactive Sites. �C-9321M.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version:12/01/2011 Source: Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports:01/19/2012 Last EDR Contact:03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites(LUST). Date of Government Version:05/29/2008 Source: Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/24/2008 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports:07/31/2008 Last EDR Contact:05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update:37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents,the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation,handling,storage,treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version:12/26/2017 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/25/2018 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports:03/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/23/2018 Number of Days to Update:54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites(UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version:02/28/2018 Source: Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/14/2018 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version:03/27/2018 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/03/2018 Telephone: 530-666-8646 Date Made Active in Reports:05/04/2018 Last EDR Contact:03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update:31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version:02/01/2018 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/2018 Telephone: 530-749-7523 Date Made Active in Reports:03/21/2018 Last EDR Contact:04/25/2018 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Varies �8-321259q.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report,the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example,the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover,the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data.Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version:01/03/2018 Source: Department of Energy&Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/14/2018 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports:03/22/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/18/2018 Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/11/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:07/27/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 107 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version:12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/31/2018 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports:03/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update:37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/25/2017 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports:09/25/2017 Last EDR Contact:04/12/2018 Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version:12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/23/2018 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports:04/09/2018 Last EDR Contact:05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update:45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version:12/31/2016 Source: Department of Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/13/2017 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports:07/14/2017 Last EDR Contact:03/08/2018 Number of Days to Update:92 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency:Annually 7C'32425912s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle(Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty Gases(Miscellaneous)) N=Natural Gas Bundle(Natural Gas,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)).This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation.This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation.This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly,the sick,and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities-schools,daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes-where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source:American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone:312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers:Provider of Services Listing Source:Centers for Medicare&Medicaid Services Telephone:410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number,produced by Centers of Medicare&Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source:National Institutes of Health Telephone:301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source:National Center for Education Statistics Telephone:202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive,annual,national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts,which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source:National Center for Education Statistics Telephone:202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers:Licensed Facilities Source:Department of Social Services Telephone:916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source:FEMA Telephone:877-336-2627 Date of Government Version:2003,2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory Source:Department of Fish&Game Telephone:916-445-0411 �89321259�2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S.Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION ©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. �896 2591.2s Page GR-50 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ARBOR CARWASH 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 34.099654-34° 5'58.75" Longitude(West): 117.59249- 117°35'32.96" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X(Meters): 445347.2 UTM Y(Meters): 3773169.2 Elevation: 1156 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: 5620426 GUASTI, CA Version Date: 2012 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC5324295.2s Page A-1 Page 754 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General South SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY:ELEVATION PROFILES Z N O W N N .� O III- - . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ N North South TP 0 N O � V N N fli fT N N N N N N 41 V, � QI T 01 W W N N N A V A Of N V W N N W N W West East TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 1156 ft. Source:Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC5324295.2s Page A-2 Page 755 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type 06071C8630J FEMA FIRM Flood data Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type 06071C8628J FEMA FIRM Flood data 06071C8629H FEMA FIRM Flood data NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage GUASTI YES-refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found AQUIFLOWO Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported '©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts,Inc.,Bainbridge Island,WA.All rights reserved.All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s),which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS)investigation. TC5324295.2s Page A-3 Page 756 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Quaternary Series: Quaternary Code: Q (decoded above as Era,System&Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale-a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS- 11 (1994). TC5324295.2s Page A-4 Page 757 SSURGO SOIL MAP - 5324295.2s 1 2 U �1 � Target Property 111 6 118 Nfil" SSURGO Soil Water SITE NAME: Arbor Carwash CLIENT: RGS Geosciences ADDRESS: 9744 Arrow Route CONTACT: Christopher Krall Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 INQUIRY#: 5324295.2s Page 758 LAT/LONG: 34.099654/1 1 7.59249 DATE: June 07,2018 12:54 pm Copyright m 2018 EDR,Inc.(c)2015 TonnTom Rel.2015. GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey(NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: HANFORD Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class B- Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential- Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max:42 Max:7.8 Materials(more SOILS,Sands, Min: 14 Min:6.1 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200),Silty Soils. 2 11 inches 59 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max:42 Max:7.8 Materials(more SOILS,Sands, Min: 14 Min:5.6 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200),Silty Soils. Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Hanford Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class B- Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained TC5324295.2s Page A-6 Page 759 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential- Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max:42 Max:7.8 materials(35 SOILS,Sands, Min: 14 Min:6.1 pct.or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200),Silty,or Clayey Gravel and Sand. 2 11 inches 59 inches fine sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max:42 Max:7.8 materials(35 SOILS,Sands, Min: 14 Min:5.6 pct.or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200),Silty,or Clayey Gravel and Sand. LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE(miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 0.001 miles State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TIP 2 USGS40000140837 1/2- 1 Mile South 4 USGS40000140834 1/2- 1 Mile SSE TC5324295.2s Page A-7 Page 760 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note:PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 3149 1/2- 1 Mile South 3 1071 1/2- 1 Mile SE TC5324295.2s Page A-8 Page 761 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 5324295.2S 1240 40 240 4� 1200 \ti o� a 6 IlW 9th St 1120 V120 Burlin ton Nor ern a \o o, \ th St z �y o IOW 6th St LA 0 0 0 1 40 County Boundary o 1i4 1i2 1 Miles N Major Roads N Contour Lines Groundwater Flow Direction N Earthquake Fault Lines CcD Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location OO Earthquake epicenter,Richter 5 or greater c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location ® Water Wells H D Closest Hydrogeological Data © Public Water Supply Wells • Oil,gas or related wells ® Cluster of Multiple Icons SITE NAME: Arbor Carwash CLIENT: RGS Geosciences ADDRESS: 9744 Arrow Route CONTACT: Christopher Krall Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 INQUIRY#: 5324295.2s Page 762 LAT/LONG: 34.099654/1 1 7.59249 DATE: June 07,2018 12:54 pm Copyright cg 2018 EDR,Inc.0 2015 TomTom Rai.2015. GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 1 South CA WELLS 3149 1/2-1 Mile Lower Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 036/018-005 User ID: TAN FRDS Number: 3610018037 County: San Beernardino District Number: 13 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Raw Source Lat/Long: 340525.0 1173530.0 Precision: Undefined Source Name: WELL 30 System Number: 3610018 System Name: CUCAMONGA CWD Organization That Operates System: P O BOX 638 CUCAMONGA 91730 Pop Served: 128000 Connections: 34398 Area Served: CUCAMONGA Sample Collected: 03-JAN-12 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-JAN-12 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 07-FEB-12 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-FEB-12 Findings: 4.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 05-MAR-12 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-APR-12 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-APR-12 Findings: 4.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 24-APR-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-APR-12 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 07-MAY-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-MAY-12 Findings: 6.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 15-MAY-12 Findings: 36. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 15-MAY-12 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-6� 763 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 22-MAY-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-MAY-12 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 30-MAY-12 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-MAY-12 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 04-JUN-12 Findings: 37. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-JUN-12 Findings: 6.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-JUN-12 Findings: 40. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-JUN-12 Findings: 6.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 19-JUN-12 Findings: 41. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-JUN-12 Findings: 6.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 26-JUN-12 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 26-JUN-12 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 02-JUL-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-JUL-12 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 09-JUL-12 Findings: 40. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-JUL-12 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 16-JUL-12 Findings: 4.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 23-JUL-12 Findings: 39. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-JUL-12 Findings: 6.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 31-JUL-12 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 31-JUL-12 Findings: 6.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-AUG-12 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-64 764 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 20-AUG-12 Findings: 17. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-AUG-12 Findings: 17. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-SEP-12 Findings: 15. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-SEP-12 Findings: 15. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-SEP-12 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-SEP-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-SEP-12 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 01-OCT-12 Findings: 17. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-12 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-12 Findings: 4.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 15-OCT-12 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-OCT-12 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-OCT-12 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 05-NOV-12 Findings: 18. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-NOV-12 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-NOV-12 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-NOV-12 Findings: 6.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 09-SEP-13 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-SEP-13 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-OCT-13 Findings: 0.22 UG/L Chemical: DIBROMOCHLOROPROPANE(DBCP) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-13 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-13 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-69e 765 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 14-OCT-13 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-OCT-13 Findings: 6.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 21-OCT-13 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-OCT-13 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 04-NOV-13 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-NOV-13 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-NOV-13 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-NOV-13 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-JAN-14 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06-JAN-14 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 03-MAR-14 Findings: 29. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-MAR-14 Findings: 4.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 11-MAR-14 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11-MAR-14 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 17-MAR-14 Findings: 42. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-MAR-14 Findings: 6.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 24-MAR-14 Findings: 30. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-MAR-14 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 31-MAR-14 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-APR-14 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-APR-14 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-APR-14 Findings: 4.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-J,� 766 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 01-MAY-14 Findings: 39. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 01-MAY-14 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 05-MAY-14 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 05-MAY-14 Findings: 6.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-MAY-14 Findings: 37. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-MAY-14 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 19-MAY-14 Findings: 28. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-MAY-14 Findings: 40. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-MAY-14 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 02-JUN-14 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUN-14 Findings: 19. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-JUN-14 Findings: 23. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-JUN-14 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 23-JUN-14 Findings: 36. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-JUN-14 Findings: 5.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 30-JUN-14 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-JUN-14 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-JUL-14 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JUL-14 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 410. US Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 7.8 Chemical: PH, LABORATORY Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 160. MG/L Chemical: ALKALINITY(TOTAL)AS CAC03 TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-J,� 767 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 190. MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 160. MG/L Chemical: HARDNESS(TOTAL)AS CAC03 Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 48. MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 9.9 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 24. MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 1.9 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 8.9 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 20. MG/L Chemical: SULFATE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 0.21 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE(F)(NATURAL-SOURCE) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 16. UG/L Chemical: VANADIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 270. MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 7800. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE+NITRITE(AS N) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 14-JUL-14 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-JUL-14 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 21-JUL-14 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-JUL-14 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-JUL-14 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 04-AUG-14 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-AUG-14 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 11-AUG-14 Findings: 29. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$'�_J,� 768 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 11-AUG-14 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-SEP-14 Findings: 31. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-SEP-14 Findings: 4.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-SEP-14 Findings: 4.6 UG/L Chemical: CHROMIUM,HEXAVALENT Sample Collected: 16-SEP-14 Findings: 26. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-SEP-14 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-SEP-14 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 29-SEP-14 Findings: 36. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-SEP-14 Findings: 6.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 07-OCT-14 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-OCT-14 Findings: 4.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 13-OCT-14 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-OCT-14 Findings: 5.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 20-OCT-14 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-DEC-14 Findings: 29. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JAN-15 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JAN-15 Findings: 5.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-JAN-15 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-JAN-15 Findings: 4.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 21-JAN-15 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-JAN-15 Findings: 5.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 27-JAN-15 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-J,� 769 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 27-JAN-15 Findings: 4.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 03-FEB-15 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-FEB-15 Findings: 4.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 17-FEB-15 Findings: 37. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-FEB-15 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 23-FEB-15 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-FEB-15 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 09-MAR-15 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-MAR-15 Findings: 5. UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 16-MAR-15 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-MAR-15 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 24-MAR-15 Findings: 32. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-MAR-15 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 30-MAR-15 Findings: 25. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-MAR-15 Findings: 4.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-APR-15 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-APR-15 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-APR-15 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 20-APR-15 Findings: 21. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-APR-15 Findings: 23. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-MAY-15 Findings: 18. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11-MAY-15 Findings: 37. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-J,; 770 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 11-MAY-15 Findings: 5. UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 01-JUN-15 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JUN-15 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 15-JUN-15 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 22-JUN-15 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-JUN-15 Findings: 6. UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 29-JUN-15 Findings: 17. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-JUL-15 Findings: 17. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-JUL-15 Findings: 16. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-JUL-15 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-JUL-15 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 27-JUL-15 Findings: 16. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-AUG-15 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-AUG-15 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 11-AUG-15 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-AUG-15 Findings: 19. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-AUG-15 Findings: 34. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-AUG-15 Findings: 5.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 31-AUG-15 Findings: 38. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 31-AUG-15 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-SEP-15 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-SEP-15 Findings: 4.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-6� 771 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 14-SEP-15 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-SEP-15 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 21-SEP-15 Findings: 36. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-SEP-15 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 28-SEP-15 Findings: 14. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-OCT-15 Findings: 14. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-OCT-15 Findings: 33. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-OCT-15 Findings: 6.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 26-OCT-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-NOV-15 Findings: 35. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-NOV-15 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 16-NOV-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-NOV-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-NOV-15 Findings: 2.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-NOV-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-DEC-15 Findings: 2.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 07-DEC-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-DEC-15 Findings: 2.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 21-DEC-15 Findings: 13. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-JAN-16 Findings: 7.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-JAN-16 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 01-FEB-16 Findings: 6.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-J,� 772 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 01-FEB-16 Findings: 4.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 29-FEB-16 Findings: 7.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 29-FEB-16 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 07-MAR-16 Findings: 7.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 07-MAR-16 Findings: 4.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-APR-16 Findings: 8.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-APR-16 Findings: 6.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 25-APR-16 Findings: 9.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 25-APR-16 Findings: 6.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 09-MAY-16 Findings: 8. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 09-MAY-16 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-JUN-16 Findings: 8.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-JUN-16 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 15-JUN-16 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 20-JUN-16 Findings: 8.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 20-JUN-16 Findings: 5.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 28-JUN-16 Findings: 8.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 28-JUN-16 Findings: 6. UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 05-JUL-16 Findings: 8.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 05-JUL-16 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 11-JUL-16 Findings: 8.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 11-JUL-16 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�& 773 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 18-JUL-16 Findings: 3.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 26-JUL-16 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-AUG-16 Findings: 7.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-AUG-16 Findings: 4.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 08-AUG-16 Findings: 3.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 15-AUG-16 Findings: 3.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-AUG-16 Findings: 3.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 29-AUG-16 Findings: 8. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 29-AUG-16 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 06-SEP-16 Findings: 8.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-SEP-16 Findings: 6.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-SEP-16 Findings: 8.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-SEP-16 Findings: 6.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 20-SEP-16 Findings: 8. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 20-SEP-16 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 27-SEP-16 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 04-OCT-16 Findings: 8.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 04-OCT-16 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 11-OCT-16 Findings: 7.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 11-OCT-16 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 17-OCT-16 Findings: 8. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-OCT-16 Findings: 5.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�& 774 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 25-OCT-16 Findings: 7.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 25-OCT-16 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 31-OCT-16 Findings: 8.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 31-OCT-16 Findings: 6.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 07-NOV-16 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 14-NOV-16 Findings: 3.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-NOV-16 Findings: 7.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-NOV-16 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 13-JAN-17 Findings: 7.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 13-JAN-17 Findings: 4.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 09-FEB-17 Findings: 7.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 09-FEB-17 Findings: 4.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 13-MAR-17 Findings: 7.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 13-MAR-17 Findings: 5.5 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 20-MAR-17 Findings: 7.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 20-MAR-17 Findings: 4.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 17-APR-17 Findings: 8. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-APR-17 Findings: 5.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 24-APR-17 Findings: 9.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 24-APR-17 Findings: 6.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 01-MAY-17 Findings: 8.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 01-MAY-17 Findings: 5.8 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a?e 775 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 08-MAY-17 Findings: 7.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 08-MAY-17 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 15-MAY-17 Findings: 8.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 15-MAY-17 Findings: 6.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 22-MAY-17 Findings: 7.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-MAY-17 Findings: 5.6 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 30-MAY-17 Findings: 7.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-MAY-17 Findings: 4.9 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 05-JUN-17 Findings: 6.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 05-JUN-17 Findings: 4.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 12-JUN-17 Findings: 6.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-JUN-17 Findings: 4.3 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 19-JUN-17 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 26-JUN-17 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 03-JUL-17 Findings: 5.7 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-17 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-JUL-17 Findings: 7.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-JUL-17 Findings: 5.2 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 24-JUL-17 Findings: 7.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 24-JUL-17 Findings: 5.4 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE Sample Collected: 02-AUG-17 Findings: 220. MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 02-OCT-17 Findings: 7.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s PagT-�z 776 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 02-OCT-17 Findings: 5.1 UG/L Chemical: PERCHLORATE 2 South FED USGS USGS40000140837 1/2-1 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-340517117353001 Monloc name: 001 S007W14E001 S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070203 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 34.0880661 Longitude: -117.5925527 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Vert measure units: Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Vert accmeasure units: Not Reported Vertcollection method: Not Reported Vert coord refsys: Not Reported Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:0 3 SE CA WELLS 1071 1/2-1 Mile Lower Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 01S/07W-14G01 S User ID: TAN FRDS Number: 3610018025 County: San Beernardino District Number: 13 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Raw Source Lat/Long: 340525.0 1173500.0 Precision: 100 Feet(one Second) Source Name: WELL 05 System Number: 3610018 System Name: CUCAMONGA CWD Organization That Operates System: P O BOX 638 CUCAMONGA 91730 Pop Served: 128000 Connections: 34398 Area Served: CUCAMONGA TC5324295.2s Pag$'�_a� 777 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 200. MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 1200. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE+NITRITE(AS N) Sample Collected: 14-JUL-14 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-JUL-14 Findings: 6.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-JUL-14 Findings: 5.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-AUG-14 Findings: 7.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11-AUG-14 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-AUG-14 Findings: 6.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 25-AUG-14 Findings: 6.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-SEP-14 Findings: 6.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-SEP-14 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-SEP-14 Findings: 3.4 UG/L Chemical: CHROMIUM,HEXAVALENT Sample Collected: 16-SEP-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-SEP-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-SEP-14 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-OCT-14 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-OCT-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-OCT-14 Findings: 6.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-OCT-14 Findings: 7.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-DEC-14 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JAN-15 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a� 778 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 12-JAN-15 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-JAN-15 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-JAN-15 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-FEB-15 Findings: 6.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-FEB-15 Findings: 6.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-FEB-15 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-FEB-15 Findings: 6.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-MAR-15 Findings: 5.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-MAR-15 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-MAR-15 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-MAR-16 Findings: 1.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 14-MAR-16 Findings: 1.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-APR-16 Findings: 1.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 13-APR-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 18-APR-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 25-APR-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-MAY-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 09-MAY-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 16-MAY-16 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 24-MAY-16 Findings: 1.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 31-MAY-16 Findings: 1.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-JUN-16 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�& 779 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 15-JUN-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 20-JUN-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 28-JUN-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 05-JUL-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 11-JUL-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 18-JUL-16 Findings: 1.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 26-JUL-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-AUG-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 08-AUG-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 15-AUG-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-AUG-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 29-AUG-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-SEP-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-SEP-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 20-SEP-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 27-SEP-16 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 04-OCT-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 11-OCT-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-OCT-16 Findings: 1.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 25-OCT-16 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 31-OCT-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 07-NOV-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a; 780 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 14-NOV-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-NOV-16 Findings: 1.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-NOV-16 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 05-DEC-16 Findings: 1.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-DEC-16 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 19-DEC-16 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 27-DEC-16 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 13-JAN-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 23-JAN-17 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-JAN-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 09-FEB-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 13-MAR-17 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 27-MAR-17 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 03-APR-17 Findings: 1.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 10-APR-17 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 17-APR-17 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 24-APR-17 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 01-MAY-17 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 08-MAY-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 15-MAY-17 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-MAY-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-MAY-17 Findings: 1.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a� 781 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 05-JUN-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 12-JUN-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 19-JUN-17 Findings: 1.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 300. US Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 7.1 Chemical: PH, LABORATORY Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 150. MG/L Chemical: ALKALINITY(TOTAL)AS CAC03 Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 180. MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 120. MG/L Chemical: HARDNESS(TOTAL)AS CAC03 Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 37. MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 7.4 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 22. MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 2.1 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 3.9 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 12. MG/L Chemical: SULFATE Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 0.15 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE(F)(NATURAL-SOURCE) Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 3.5 UG/L Chemical: CHROMIUM,HEXAVALENT Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 24. UG/L Chemical: VANADIUM Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 210. MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 22-JUN-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE+NITRITE(AS N) Sample Collected: 26-JUN-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-17 Findings: 1.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) TC5324295.2s Pag$'�& 782 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 17-JUL-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 24-JUL-17 Findings: 1.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 31-JUL-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-AUG-17 Findings: 210. MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 05-SEP-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 02-OCT-17 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 09-OCT-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 23-OCT-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 30-OCT-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 06-NOV-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 18-DEC-17 Findings: 1.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 08-JAN-18 Findings: 1.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS N) Sample Collected: 03-JAN-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-JAN-12 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-JAN-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 25-JAN-12 Findings: 5.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-FEB-12 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-FEB-12 Findings: 4.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-FEB-12 Findings: 5.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-FEB-12 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 05-MAR-12 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-MAR-12 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�& 783 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 19-MAR-12 Findings: 5.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-MAR-12 Findings: 5.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-APR-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-APR-12 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-APR-12 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-APR-12 Findings: 4.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 01-MAY-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-MAY-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 15-MAY-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-MAY-12 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-MAY-12 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-JUN-12 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-JUN-12 Findings: 4.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-JUN-12 Findings: 4.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 26-JUN-12 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-JUL-12 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-JUL-12 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-JUL-12 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 31-JUL-12 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06-AUG-12 Findings: 5.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-AUG-12 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 28-AUG-12 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a4 784 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 04-SEP-12 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-SEP-12 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-SEP-12 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-SEP-12 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-12 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 15-OCT-12 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-OCT-12 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-OCT-12 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 05-NOV-12 Findings: 5.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-NOV-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-NOV-12 Findings: 4.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 26-NOV-12 Findings: 4.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-DEC-12 Findings: 6.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-DEC-12 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-DEC-12 Findings: 6.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 26-DEC-12 Findings: 5.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 31-DEC-12 Findings: 6.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-JAN-13 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-JAN-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-JAN-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-FEB-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 25-FEB-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a?e 785 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 04-MAR-13 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11-MAR-13 Findings: 6.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-MAR-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 25-MAR-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-APR-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-APR-13 Findings: 4.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-APR-13 Findings: 4.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06-MAY-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 15-MAY-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-MAY-13 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-JUN-13 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUN-13 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-JUN-13 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-JUN-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-JUL-13 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-JUL-13 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-JUL-13 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 05-AUG-13 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-AUG-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 26-AUG-13 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-SEP-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-SEP-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s PagTNa� 786 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 16-SEP-13 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-SEP-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-SEP-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-OCT-13 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-OCT-13 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 21-OCT-13 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 04-NOV-13 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-NOV-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-NOV-13 Findings: 4.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 25-NOV-13 Findings: 6.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 09-DEC-13 Findings: 6.6 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-DEC-13 Findings: 5.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-DEC-13 Findings: 7. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06-JAN-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 13-JAN-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 20-JAN-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-JAN-14 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-FEB-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-FEB-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 18-FEB-14 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-FEB-14 Findings: 4.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03-MAR-14 Findings: 6.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a� 787 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 10-MAR-14 Findings: 4.8 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 17-MAR-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 24-MAR-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 31-MAR-14 Findings: 5. MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07-APR-14 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 14-APR-14 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 22-APR-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 29-APR-14 Findings: 6.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 05-MAY-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12-MAY-14 Findings: 4.9 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 19-MAY-14 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 27-MAY-14 Findings: 4.7 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 02-JUN-14 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUN-14 Findings: 5.3 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 16-JUN-14 Findings: 5.4 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 23-JUN-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 30-JUN-14 Findings: 5.1 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08-JUL-14 Findings: 5.2 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE(AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 320. US Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 7.7 Chemical: PH, LABORATORY Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 150. MG/L Chemical: ALKALINITY(TOTAL)AS CAC03 Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 190. MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a� 788 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 130. MG/L Chemical: HARDNESS(TOTAL)AS CAC03 Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 40. MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 8.2 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 19. MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 1.8 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 4.5 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 12. MG/L Chemical: SULFATE Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 0.29 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE(F)(NATURAL-SOURCE) Sample Collected: 10-JUL-14 Findings: 18. UG/L Chemical: VANADIUM 4 SSE FED USGS USGS40000140834 1/2-1 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-340516117345801 Monloc name: 001 S007W14G001 S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070203 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 34.0877884 Longitude: -117.5836636 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Vert measure units: Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Vert accmeasure units: Not Reported Vertcollection method: Not Reported Vert coord refsys: Not Reported Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:0 TC5324295.2s Pag$'�_a� 789 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database:CA Radon Radon Test Results Zipcode Num Tests >4 pCi/L 91730 34 0 Federal EPA Radon Zone for SAN BERNARDINO County: 2 Note:Zone 1 indoor average level>4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level>=2 pCi/L and<=4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level<2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 91730 Number of sites tested: 1 Area Average Activity %<4 pCi/L %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCi/L Living Area-1 st Floor 2.400 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% Living Area-2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC5324295.2s Pag$-�-a; 790 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model(DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006.The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000-and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps.The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S.Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and 03 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source:FEMA Telephone:877-336-2627 Date of Government Version:2003,2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory Source:Department of Fish&Game Telephone:916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System(AIS)to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report,hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G.Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J.Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale-A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M.Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS-11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)leads the national Conservation Soil Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,storing,maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape.Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed(SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO:Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO)database.SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps.This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners,townships and county natural resource planning and management. Pa3e24P912s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells,rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System(SDWIS)after August 1995. Prior to August 1995,the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System(FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System(NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater.The groundwater data includes information on wells,springs,and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source:Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database:CA Radon Source:Department of Health Services Telephone:916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986-1992.Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307&309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S.with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. �C-932A2M.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration,800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information(also from 1975)regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California's Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION ©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. Pa3e24PR.2s Page PSGR-3 Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 16.6 Interview Documentation RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 Page 794 No interviews were conducted due to the open and vacant nature of the property. RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 Page 795 16.8 Resume RGS Engineering Geology Page 8 Page 796 CHRISTOPHER M. KRALL P.G, C.E.G., REA POSITION: Principal Engineering Geologist EDUCATION: B.S., Geology, University of Redlands, Redlands, California, 1985 Special Studies in Environmental Waste Management, University of California, Riverside Extension Program, Cal-OSHA Safety Training Program for Hazardous Waste Workers, Trench Excavation Safety EXPERIENCE: Mr. Krall has performed numerous preliminary geotechnical investigations throughout southern California. He has conducted fault investigations along the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Elsinore-Whittier, Willard, Wildomar, Murrieta Hot Springs, Cucamonga, Casa Loma and Park Hills fault zones. Mr. Krall is experienced in percolation testing, geologic field mapping, subsurface explorations, aerial photo interpretations, seismic refraction surveys, laboratory testing and report preparations. In various localities, these studies have involved evaluation of slope stability, landslides, fault zones, seismicity, liquefaction, ground water conditions, grading requirements and other geologic conditions. Mr. Krall has served as the Project Manager for Assessment District 159 and 161 improvements in the Temecula area of Riverside County, California. Mr. Krall has gained extensive practical experience on transportation related projects through his participation in a variety of highway and road improvement projects on major San Bernardino and Riverside County Highways. He has been involved in geotechnical investigations on five major highway projects in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties including: Highway 74/Ortega Highway; Highway 178/San Bernardino County; Interstate 10/San Bernardino County; Route 91/Riverside County; and Highway 60/Riverside County. Mr. Krall is knowledgeable and experienced in working with highway operating right-of-ways, encroachment permits and lane closure procedures, in accordance with Caltrans standards. Additionally, Mr. Krall has been involved in the preparation of Materials reports following Caltrans Test 130 procedures. ASSOCIATIONS/AFFILIATIONS: Member - Inland Geologic Society Member - Geologic Society of America Member - Association of Engineering Geologist REGISTRATIONS: Registered Geologist - State of California Certified Engineering Geologist - State of California Registered Environmental Assessor - State of California Certified Concrete Technician - American Concrete Institute RGS Engineering Geology Page 9 Page 797 Appendix D Roadway Construction Noise Modeling Data Page 798 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 799 Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81 .7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 800 file:///PI/...%20Express%2OCar%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%2OSite%2oPreparation.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81 .7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61 .3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 801 file:///PI/...%20Express%2OCar%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%2OSite%2oPreparation.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Paving **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 360.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Concrete Mixer Truck 61.7 57.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 60.1 57.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 802 file:///PI/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 205.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Concrete Mixer Truck 66.5 62.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 65.0 62.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 803 file:///PI/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81 .7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 804 file:///PI/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81 .7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61 .3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 805 file:///PI/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Demolition **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 72.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.4 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 806 file:///PI/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%o20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 77.3 70.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.3 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 807 file:///PI/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%o20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Construction **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 360.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Crane 63.4 55.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 56.9 52.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 808 file:///PI/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[I I/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 205.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Crane 68.3 60.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 61.7 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 809 file:///PI/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[I I/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Arch Coatings **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 360.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 205.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Page 810 file:///Pl/...r%20Express%2OCar%2OWash ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OArch%2OCoatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 811 file:///Pl/...r%20Express%2OCar%2OWash ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OArch%2OCoatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Site Preparation **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Faimly Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 812 file:///PI/...ss%20Car%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OSite%2OPreparation%2ORetail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 813 file:///PI/...ss%20Car%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OSite%2OPreparation%2ORetail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Paving **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 146.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Concrete Mixer Truck 69.5 65.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 67.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 70.7 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 814 file:///PI/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 308.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Concrete Mixer Truck 63.0 59.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 61.4 58.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 64.2 57.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 815 file:///PI/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Grading **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.0 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 816 file:///PI/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 817 file:///PI/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Construction **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 146.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Crane 71.2 63.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 71.3 68.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 64.7 60.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 818 file:///PI/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[i t/l/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 308.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Crane 64.8 56.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 64.8 61.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 58.2 54.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 819 file:///PI/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[i t/l/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Arch Coatings **** Receptor#1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 146.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor#2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 308.0 0.0 Results Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Page 820 file:///PI/...ess%20Car%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OArch%2OCoatings%2ORetail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 61.9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 61 .9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 821 file:///PI/...ess%20Car%2OWash_ISMND_Rancho%2OCucamonga/Technical%2OStudies/Noise/RCNM%2OArch%2OCoatings%2ORetail.txt[I1/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Appendix E Noise Study Page 822 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 823 Ldn Consu/tinges X"ICAW 42428 Chisolm Trail,Murrieta CA 92562 phone 760-473-1253 www.ldnconsulting.net fax 760-689-4943 October 8, 2018 Alan Smith Owner/ Developer 12549 Overland Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Subject: The Arbor Carwash Facility Operational Noise Assessment in the City of Rancho Cucamonga CA Ldn Consulting is pleased to submit the following noise impact analysis for the proposed Arbors Carwash Project(project). The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate operational noise levels from the proposed car wash, and central vacuum equipment. The calculated noise levels have been propagated to the nearest potential habitat using the logarithmic relationship describing the acoustical spreading or drop off rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance from the source. The propagated noise levels are then compared to the applicable City standards. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The project consists of a carwash facility and is proposing a drive thru carwash building. The project site is located at 9744 Arrow Route in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. The proposed project site vicinity map is provided in Figure 1. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and across Arrow Route, a school use to the north and a residential property to the east. It should be noted: the residential property to the east is looking to rezone that property to commercial. The proposed site configuration can be seen in Figure 2. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS Section 17.66.050 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's municipal code regulates exterior noise levels. The noise ordinance provides Noise Standards relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. 10/8/18 - 1 - 18-47 The ArbcPfigigv loise Alan Smith Lei CbMWdAW&Jha Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone760-473-1253 li San Antonio F'Eel Cff1�6 ,FI $ f "Illud■Rd f r ■ :� f W 21ra91* r f / 'WrgLl,8t# 4 59P all e - `a _ -Js Rd 1W 161681 Et6tIr51 Lilr•4L arrfln#Au• _f W t-oas1III Revd E 7 t V AII vr N h W 14rr"Nrr y� �E ArJ-*W"WY Art R4 Rancho } Cucamonga 4 k ftl7SL 54n9amurfino8l W4sl&1 9r +h$t E4015i SdR 9wndrA MontclairTF; a � 'I131i81O VIP rILAL5l�d W HOIDI-i1r EADhipl'rd 5 rrp# rCT t Etdon Elva W fAii:lal& d d ■ £ !I 7 IJt C ri. ' - FtnCISS1 �a *l4r R � ,Sfi *w• p cc w n�reralr -- "}n% - — d .ta � E klrvrid•4F W ElliILfbAve _ Sourm7ESFi, ERE, tie rrre, U ,ilnter If CRElV1EN�- 7k Projed_Location P, lJRCen, EsriJapan, lV1E I,Esri China IFion , Korea, EsrilThaiIsnd), roagnylndis, N GCC.Q 0 penStreLkMa p n mntributcrs.and the CIS U -eF C,cmmunity 0 1 2 Miles Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map 1 in = 2 miles 10/8/2018 - 2 - 18-47 The Arb(l?9qIgv825NIoise Alan Smith LeiGDU0pdMWDw. Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 •- .. -- - - ARGMHAf.DALE-•--•-- .. ...----- - TI ! w _■i € 1--- i t'f? x - - P 1. l g - C f4d. � _4 1 .Eft -- �_ ..... ._,� �_ ....._ . ..--•- -.._..�. �. Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan 10/8/2018 - 3 - 18-47 The Arb(l?9qi%v82gVoise Alan Smith WIN CVJpdMW JAW. Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone760-473-1253 Existing Setting Noise level measurements were conducted between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on "slow" response and "A-weighting." The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 1 provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Attachment A. The Measurement location is shown in Figure 3. Table 1: Summary of Noise Level Measurements 1 Central of site at northern property line—set back from roadways 63.4 37.1 90.8 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Proposed Carwash and Central Vacuum The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system, the manufacturer's noise specification is provided in AttachmentB. The carwash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north. The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3. The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The manufacturer's noise specification is provided in Attachment B. The modeling includes an 8-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. The location of the central vacuum is shown in Figure 3. Proposed HVAC Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA as can be seen in AttachmentB. 10/8/2018 - 4 - 18-47 The ArbcF99iav827Noise Alan Smith Lei CbMWdAW&Jha Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone760-473-1253 � F • VVI _y a +_4 sf.W�,' r4 -1 7 mafx` i - ---- ---- ---- --J r L 1 - 4 CF{`a'l c� Noise Measurement Location -' F Central Vacuum Blowers rip St L Project Boundary - -- Site Plan - " 1.1 1 15 user 9 59 100 NKiiiiii Feet Figure 3 Proposed Site Configuration 10/8/2018 - 5 - 18-47 The Arbdr39qi%v828Voise Alan Smith W117 CVJpdMW DWI Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone760-473-1253 Operational Noise Modeling Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SounclPLAN Essential, version 4.1, a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package (NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO Standard 9613-2, "Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation." The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data. The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impac"s, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time. Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver. Acoustically hard sites include surfaces, such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off site uses are considered acoustically soft, or absorptive, therefore, an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 2. Elevations were taken from the project plans. Table 2: Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) PowerNoise Source 1W F Number of Sourcels Reference Sound Carwash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 3 80.0 ' Reference Noise Level provided in Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific points are shown in Table 3. The results of the noise modeling along with the receiver locations are shown are shown in Figure 4 for the unmitigated scenario. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, noise levels would not exceed the City's standards for adjacent properties. Therefore, no noise abatement measure is required to comply with City standards. 10/8/2018 - 6 - 18-47 The Arb0figov829Joise Alan Smith Lei CbMKdAW&Jha Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone760-473-1253 Table 3: Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Receiver Without Mitigation R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 FINDINGS Operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at adjacent properties with the following design features: 1. The carwash dryer system shall not to exceed 82.5 d6A unmitigated noise level at 5 feet and shall be set back within the carwash tunnel approximately eight feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. 2. All carwash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, and vacuum motor and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. 3. In order to meet daytime noise limits as defined in the Escondido Noise Ordinance, the carwash must cease operating no later than 10.00 p.m. No noise abatement measures are required or recommended. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (760) 473-1253. Sincerely, Ldn Consulting, Inc. \\Vt\ Jeremy Louden, Principal ATTACHMENTS A- Measurement Data B - Sound Reference Data 10/8/2018 - 7 - 18-47 The Arb(l?9qi%v83OJoise Alan Smith LeiGDU0pdMWDw. Owner/ Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 �I. _ 7 I — � 2 ALA L; ' � 1 -- ---- --- — $ t ti g/ -- - ---- ---- --V - -- ---- -- - --- ---- -E -' 2b Receivers - Central Vacuum Blowers "+ ❑ HVAC • `- d8A Le-50 55 ryry — 60 i�•� �• n 70 7 � , , L •�Project Boundary =.S.. Lap cantri iltarps, 5 r,Gecgr4 Pd rbu Site Plan thA,O 15IJse Y+ 9 59 100 NMl6iiiiii Feet Figure 4 Unmitigated Noise Level Contours 10/8/2018 - 8 - 18-47 The Arb(l?9qi%v831Voise �al Information Attachment A: Ambient Noise Levels Serial Number 21733 Model 703+ User Job Description Location Start Time Wednesday, 9 May 2018 12:00:14 Stop Time Wednesday, 9 May 2018 13:30:14 Run Time 01:30:00 Pre Calibration 12:00:01 Post Calibration 13:30:26 Calibration Deviation 60 Sec. Sample Interval Note Results Dose 4 Dose 1.3 Projected Dose 6.9 0 Leq 63.4 dBA TWA 63.4 dBA TWA (8) 56.1 dBA Lmax 90.8 dBA Lpeak (max) 122.8 dB SEA 125.8 dB Lmin 37.1 dBA Lep (8) 56.1 dBA SE 0.0 Pa2hr Overload? Yes Iratis ics L10 60.0 dBA L30 56.5 dBA L50 54.5 dBA L70 53.0 dBA L90 51.0 dBA Settings Exchange Rate 3 Threshold 0 dBA Criterion Level 75 dBA Criterion Duration 8 hours RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight Unweighted Detector Slow Gain 30 dB Page 832 measuretnemne►utis The results of all measurements, in the form of print-outs directly from the sound level meter, can be found following this report. All measurements were taken as 15-second averages. For clarity, the results of the 1/3-octave band measurements are Listed below. For comparison, I have included the test results from our measurements taken on your original blower (1 motor configuration) in 1998. '/s-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels, in decibels A) Center Fregygncv S Feel frolILBIgMers 10 feet-from B Iowers 5 Feet, oM RIgzwer a UZ (4 motor systEM) 4 motoz systea�, 0 motor-1998 t(st) 25 76.1 70.2 67.3 31.5 76.6 71.9 71.4 40 76.8 72.0 75.5 50 78.4 74.2 79.3 63 77.8 72.8 85.3 80 77.3 74.8 81.9 100 78.1 74.0 63.7 125 80.0 73.7 83.3 160 75.9 73.8 86.4 200 77.0 73.9 85.9 250 81.7 73.7 88.5 315 79.3 75.0 90.3 400 83.6 80.5 97.0 500 76.9 73.7 96.2 630 67.0 70.8 96.5 800 67.1 63.7 89.7 1,000 66.4 64.9 88.5 1,250 64.5 64.5 84.7 1,600 65.8 63.7 82.4 2,000 64.5 61.5 83.0 2,500 61.4 59.4 80.3 3,150 61.5 58.3 78.5 4,000 59.5 56.8 76.4 5,000 57.9 54.1 74.0 6,300 54.5 49.9 72.5 8,000 51.3 48.8 70.6 10,000 49.6 44.5 68,9 12,500 47.2 42.2 67.1 16,000 44.9 38.4 64.3 20,000 38.9 32.8 59.9 Overall (sum): 90.5 dB 86.4 dB 103.0 dB A-Weighted: 82.5 dBA 79.4 dBA 99.8 dBA Please note that even though the data are listed to the nearest 0.1 decibel, accuracy beyond the nearest whole decibel should not be expected. Page 833 Attachment B: Central Vacuum Noise Levels VAC U T E SOUND LEVEL METER READINGS MODEL: FT-DD-T460HP3(60HP TURBINE VACUUM PRODUCER) READING ONE: 72 DB-A, 10 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45'ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING TWO: 65 DB-A, 20 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45'ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING THREE:59 DB-A, 30 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45' ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. SOUND LEVEL METER USED: SIMPSON MODEL#40003—MSHA APPROVED. MEETS OSHA&WALSH-HEALY REQUIREMENTS FOR NOISE CONTROL. CONFORMS TO ANSI 51.4-1983, IEC 651 SPECS FOR METER TYPE. NOTE:THESE READINGS WERE TAKEN OUTSIDE ON CONCRETE SLAB NO ENCLOSURE. Vacutech 1350 Hi-Tech Drive,Sheridan WY, 82801 PHONE: (800)917-9444 FAX.• (303) 675-1988 EMAIL:info@vacutechllc WEB SITE: vacutechllc.com Page 834 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels TRAII/E� Split System Cooling Product Data Three Phase 4TTA3 2'/2 - 5 Tons PUB. NO. 22-1791 -14-EN Page 835 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels TJ?ME� Features and Benefits • All aluminum Spine Fin TM coil • Compressor Sump Heat • WeatherGuardTM fasteners • S.E.E.T.design testing • Quick-SessTM cabinet, service access • 100% line run test and refrigerant connections with full . Low ambient cooling to 55T as coil protection shipped • DuraTuffTm base,fast complete drain, . Low ambient cooling to 30T with weatherproof AY28XO79 • Comfort"R"TM mode approved • Low ambient cooling to 0°F with • Glossy corrosion resistant finish BAYLOAM103 • Internal compressor high/low pressure and temperature protection • Extended warranties available • Liquid line filter-drier • Polyslate gray cabinet with anthracite gray badge and cap • R-410A refrigerant • Low Pressure Switch • High Pressure Switch Page 8 -1©2016Trane 2 221791-14-EN Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels rXWE" Contents Features and Benefits 2 General Data 4 Product Specifications 4 A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] 4 Accessory Description and Usage 5 AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions 5 Model Nomenclature 7 Electrical Data 8 Dimensions 12 Mechanical Specification Options 14 Page 837 22-1791-14-EN 3 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels TRM/E" General Data Product Specifications Model No.O 4TTA3030A3 4TTA3030A4 4TTA3036133 4TTA3036134 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz O 200/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 10 5 14 8 Max Fuse Size(Amps) 15 15 20 15 Compressor RECIP RECIP SCROLL SCROLL RLAmps-LRAmps 7.4-54.9 3.7-28 10.4-73 5.8-38 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 0.7 0.4 0.56 0.4 Fan HP 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 Fan Dia(inches) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Coil Spine FinTM Spine FinTM Spine FinTM Spine FinTM Refrigerant R-410A 5/11-LB/OZ 5/11-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ Line Size-(in.)O.D.Gas® 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 Line Size-(in.)O.D.Liquid® 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec.Subcooling 10, 10, 10, 10, Dimensions H x W x D(Crated) 38 x 30.1 x 33 38 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 Weight-Shipping 224 222 176 176 Weight-Net 197 195 149 149 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28XO79 AY28XO79 AY28XO79 AY28XO79 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs-Base&Cap 4"High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs-4"Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset© TAYREFLN2' TAYREFLN2' TAYREFLN7' TAYREFLN7' O Certified in accordance with the Unitary Air-Conditioner equipment certification program which is based on AHRI Standard 210/240. ® Calculated in accordance with N.E.C.Only use HACR circuit breakers or fuses. O Standard line lengths-60'.Standard lift-60'Suction and Liquid line. For greater lengths and lifts refer to refrigerant piping software Pub#32-3312-0t.(tdenotes latest revision) ® For accessory description and usage,see page 5. © "=15,20,25,30,40 and 50 foot lineset available. A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] SOUND POWER A_WEIGHTED FULL OVTAVE SOUND POWER LEVEL dB-[dB(A)] MODEL LEVEL[dB(A)] 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 4TTA3030A3/4 78 49 60.2 66 70.3 71.4 69.8 60.4 53 4TTA3036B3/4 78 45.5 58.7 63.1 69.7 70 68.1 59 49.8 4TTA3042D3/4 79 47.5 64.5 67 75.3 74 70.7 62.2 52.8 4TTA3048D3/4 j 79 47.4 60 1 66.9 j 75.3 1 73.5 j 70.3 j 62 1 51.4 4TTA306OD3/4 1 80 1 47.3 55.7 69 72.7 1 75.8 1 69.4 1 62.2 1 53.3 Note:Rated in accordance with AHRI Stnadard 270-2008 4 Page 82281791-14-EN Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels TJ?ME� General Data Product Specifications Model No.O 4TTA3042D3 4TTA3042D4 4TTA3048D3 4TTA3048D4 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz O 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 18 8 18 8 Max Fuse Size(Amps) 30 15 30 15 Compressor SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL RLAmps-LRAmps 13.6-83 6.4-41 13.7-83 6.4-41 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 1.2 0.6 1.2 0.6 Fan HP 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/5 Fan Dia(inches) 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 Coil Spine Fin TM Spine Fin TM Spine Fin TM Spine Fin TM Refrigerant R-410A 6/2-LB/OZ 6/2-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ Line Size-(in.)O.D.Gas® 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 Line Size-(in.)O.D.Liquid® 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec.Subcooling 10, 10, 10, 10, Dimensions H x W x D(Crated) 34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 Weight-Shipping 228 228 235 235 Weight-Net 196 196 203 203 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A TAYASCT501 A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28XO79 AY28XO79 AY28XO79 AY28XO79 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs-Base&Cap 4"High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs-4"Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 BAY24XO45 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset© TAYREFLN7" TAYREFLN7` TAYREFLN3` TAYREFLN3 Accessory Description and Usage AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions Anti-Short Cycle Timer — Solid state timing device that prevents AHRI STANDARD 210/240 RATING CONDITIONS— compressor recycling until five (5) minutes have elapsed after (A) Cooling 80°F DB, 67°F WB air entering indoor coil, 95°F DB satisfying call or power interruptions. Use in area with questionable air entering outdoor coil. power delivery,commercial applications, long lineset,etc. (B) High Temperature Heating 47°F DB, 43°F WB air entering Evaporator Defrost Control—SPST Temperature actuated switch outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. that cycles the condenser off as indoor coil reaches freeze-up (C) Low Temperature Heating 17°F DB, 15°F WB air entering conditions.Used for low ambient cooling to 30°F with TXV. outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. Rubber Isolators — Five (5) large rubber donuts to isolate (D) Rated indoor airflow,for heating is the same as for cooling. condensing unit from transmitting energy into mounting frame or AHRI STANDARD 270 RATING CONDITIONS — (Noise rating pad. Use on any application where sound transmission needs to be numbers are determined with the unit in cooling operation.) minimized. Standard Noise Rating number is at 95°F outdoor air. Hard Start kit — Start capacitor and relay to assist compressor motor startup. Use in areas with marginal power supply, on long linesets, low ambient conditions, etc. Extreme Condition Mount Kit — Bracket kits to securely mount UnitarySonallAC C us condensing unit to a frame or pad without removing any panels. uSTE° Use in areas with high winds,or on commercial roof tops,etc. L Intertek Page 839 22-1791-14-EN 5 Appendix F Vibration Calculations Page 840 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 841 13603 Vibration Screening Receptors Distance (ft) 1 - Single-Family Residential (E) 50 2 - Mulberry Ed. Center(N) 205 Equipment PPVref D n Eref Eequip PPV Vibratory Roller 0.21 50 1.3 0.0853 Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 1.3 0.0136 Large Bulldozer 0.089 50 1.3 0.0361 Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 1.3 0.0058 Small Bulldozer 0.003 50 1.3 0.0012 Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 1.3 0.0002 Loaded Truck 0.076 50 1.3 0.0309 Loaded Truck 0.076 205 1.3 0.0049 Jackhammer 0.035 50 1.3 0.0142 Jackhammer 0.035 205 1.3 0.0023 Page 842 Appendix G Traffic Impact Analysis Page 843 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 844 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 Prepared for: Mr. Alan Smith Southwest Design Group 12223 Highland Ave., Ste. #106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Prepared by: ESSI V 25B6 E7P. `t Scott Sato, P.E. 4225 Oceanside Blvd., #354H Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 291-1400 TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. (0301-0001-03) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY............................................................................... 1 A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives B. Site Location and Study Area C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description 2. Existing Land Use 3. Proposed Land Use 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project 5. Proposed Project Opening Year 6. Proposed Project Phasing 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES................................................................... 7 A. Level of Service Definition B. Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS...................................................................................................... 11 A. Study Area Intersections B. Area Roadway System C. Existing (2018)Traffic Volumes D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC................................................................................. 15 C. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate 2. Project Trip Generation 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 4. Other Trip Generation Factors 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 2. Method of Projection 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6gEgz6DOCx) TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION PAGE 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS..................................................................................................... 33 A. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions B. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions C. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Conditions D. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year(2040)With Project Conditions 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................... 39 A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6 gEppryDOCx) LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1-A Study Area....................................................................................................................... 3 1-B Site Plan .......................................................................................................................... 4 3-A Existing (2018) Traffic Controls and Intersection Geometrics....................................... 12 3-B Existing (2018)Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 13 4-A Project Trip Distribution................................................................................................... 17 4-B Project Only Traffic Volumes.......................................................................................... 19 4-C Cumulative Developments Location Map ...................................................................... 20 4-D DRC 2018-00119 Trip Distribution................................................................................. 22 4-E DRC 2013-00565 Trip Distribution................................................................................. 23 4-F DRC 2017-00654 Trip Distribution................................................................................. 24 4-G DRC 2016-00695 Trip Distribution................................................................................. 25 4-H Neighboring Property Trip Distribution........................................................................... 26 4-1 Cumulative Development Only Traffic Volumes............................................................ 27 4-J Opening Day Plus AmbieTOCnt Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019)Traffic Volumes ...... 28 4-K Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) TrafficVolumes ............................................................................................................... 30 4-L Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Traffic Volumes................................................... 31 4-M Horizon Year(2040)With Project Traffic Volumes........................................................ 32 6-A Circulation Recommendations ....................................................................................... 40 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6 gEppr8DOCx) LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... ES-1 2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. ES-2 3-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2018) Conditions...................................................... 14 4-1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... 16 4-2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. 16 4-3 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Rates ......................................................... 21 4-4 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Summary ................................................... 21 5-1 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions................................................................................................ 34 5-2 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions ............................................................................................. 35 5-3 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Conditions........................................................... 36 5-4 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year(2040)With Project Conditions................................................................ 38 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6gEppADOCx) LIST OF APPENDICES ScopingAgreement..................................................................................................................... 3.1 TrafficCount Worksheets ........................................................................................................... 3.2 Existing (2018) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ................................................. 3.3 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets............................................................................ 5.1 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets............................................................................ 5.2 Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets............................................................................ 5.3 Horizon Year(2040)With Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets............................................................................ 5.4 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6 gEppR,TiDOCx) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed by 2019 with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip- ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37%, PM-35%) and a 5% internal trip reduction was assumed. The pass- by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES PEAK HOUR TRIP RATESI AM PM LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Automated Car Wash Empirical 140 Feet 025 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 Data Source: Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta(Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6 gEgg1.DOcx) ES-1 �Q @C ��II TABLE 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PEAK HOUR AM PM LAND USE QUANTITY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1183 Pass-by Reduction(AM-37%:PM-35%)' -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction(5%) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash,17111 Hawthorne Blvd,Lawndale,CA The traffic study has been conducted in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga traffic study guidelines. These guidelines include the following conditions: o Existing (2018) Traffic o Opening Day + Ambient Traffic + Cumulative (ODAC 2019) o Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (ODACP 2019) o Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions o Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed project. Project recommendations include: • Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. • On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. • Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC rQ$r� 6gEgnDOcx) ES-2 @C ��cL ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 1 .0 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The traffic study will be based on the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program and Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines criteria. Study objectives include the following_ Existing (2018) Traffic. Existing traffic will be counted to determine current conditions. This constitutes the environmental setting for a CEQA analysis at the time that the hearing body reviews the project. Traffic count data shall be new or recent. In some cases, data up to one year old may be acceptable with the approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department. Any exception to this must be requested prior to approval of the scoping agreement Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative (ODAC 2019). Traffic conditions prior to the time that the proposed development is completed will be estimated by increasing the existing traffic counts by an appropriate growth rate to be provided by City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department staff, projected to the year that the project is estimated to be completed. Traffic generated by other cumulative projects will then be added, and the impacts on the circulation system will be analyzed. This will be the basis for determining "no-project" conditions. Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (ODACP 2019). Traffic generated by the project will be added to the "No Project" conditions identified in Scenario 2. This scenario will identify the potential project impacts to the circulation system. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project. The Horizon Year forecasts has been developed based on applying a 2% per year growth rate (44% total growth) to the existing traffic volumes and traffic generated by other cumulative projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project. The project traffic has been added to the Horizon Year traffic volumes to determine the potential long range impacts due to the project traffic. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC�Jp6gEp(g) DOCX) rQ C 0O.7�JJ B. Site Location and Study Area The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Figure 1-A illustrates the site location and the traffic analysis study area. In general, the study area shall include any intersection of Collector or higher classification street with another Collector roadway or higher classification street, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Per discussion with City Staff, the study area includes the following intersections: STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route LI3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. /Arrow Route. C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description The Arbor Car Wash site is proposed to be developed by 2019. The following uses are proposed as indicated below: • An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel 2. Existing Land Use The project site is currently vacant. Adjacent uses include the following: • North —Residential • South —Commercial • East —Residential • West —Vacant/Gas Station 3. Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use: Car Wash 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project Figure 1-B illustrates the conceptual land use plan. As shown in Figure 1-13, the project is proposed to have a full access driveway along Arrow Route and a reciprocal access with the adjacent gas station. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6gEpp 4DOCX) 2 @C O0�� FIGURE 1 -A STUDY AREA W i SITE ARROW ROUTE 0 w ui 'z > m z O h O LEGEND: © =EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION 10 =FUTURE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION ---- =FUTURE DRIVEWAY AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:01.dwg) 3 FIGURE 1 -B SITE PLAN N —EuxD aalDxDED. „w,� Dx�E I m I 1 ID � I aE.FExxDE�l, i CDa! uxDEDnRxo - — I I ' �Q , m DExBE VN II � WRLK 'N I J r 17-2,�. L , i ,u s DxHE - nxxaxDDxD � DE,EDP E� P'q _- - la`-_-' UI a dA so E D wux axe m i o Dx�E ta 3 I --_------------'�__ ----_LP• A ROMH ARROW ROUTE AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:01.dwg) 4 5. Proposed Project Opening Year The proposed project is anticipated to be completed by 2019. Future traffic analysis has been based on a background (ambient) growth of 2% per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. 6. Proposed Project Phasing The project is expected to be completed in a single phase. Therefore, all traffic recommendations included in this report have been assumed to be completed by 2019. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC"6gEgyDOCX) 5 @C THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStgAA T ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAM TUDY REPORT 6 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES Traffic operations are quantified through the determination of"Level of Service" (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade "A" through "F" is assigned to an infrastructure facility (intersection) representing progressively worsening traffic conditions. This section presents the LOS definition, LOS criteria and methodologies for the Intersection Operations. A. Level of Service Definition The definitions of Level of Service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: • LOS "A": Completely free-flow conditions. The operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles, and operations are constrained only by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is good. Minor disruptions to flow are easily absorbed without a change in travel speed. • LOS "B": Free flow conditions, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS "A", but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver. Minor disruptions are still easily absorbed, although local deterioration in LOS will be more obvious. • LOS "C": The influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles. Minor disruptions can cause serious local deterioration in service, and queues will form behind any significant traffic disruption. • LOS "D": The ability to maneuver is restricted due to traffic congestion. Travel speed is reduced by the increasing volume. Only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating. • LOS "E": Operations at or near capacity, an unstable level. Vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. • LOS 7": Forced or breakdown flow. It occurs either when vehicles arrive at a rate greater than the rate at which they are discharged or when the forecast demand exceeds the computed capacity of a planned facility. Although operations at these points — and on sections immediately downstream — appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 7 B. City of Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established Level of Service (LOS) "D" as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS "E" or "F" is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate Level of Service (LOS) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The Levels of Service results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine level of service. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the level of service has been calculated. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 8 The levels of service are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE LEVEL OF (SECONDS) SERVICE SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT&Nf,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 9 THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStgAA T ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFF TUDY REPORT 10 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS A. Study Area Intersections In general, the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of"Collector" or higher classification street, with "Collector" or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project could have a significant impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department may require deviation from these requirements based on area conditions. Pursuant to the attached scoping agreement (see Appendix 3.1), and discussions with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the study area include the following intersections (shown previously on Figure 1-A): STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. /Arrow Route. B. Area Roadway System Figure 3-A identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The existing intersection traffic controls and geometrics are identified. C. Existing (2018)Traffic Volumes Existing intersection level of service calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts made for Trames Solutions, Inc. in June 2018 while school was in session. Existing (2018) AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 3-13. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix 3.2. Existing average daily traffic (ADT)volumes (see Figure 3-13)for the roadway are estimated based on the following formula: PM Peak Hour Link Volume (Approach + Exit) x 12 = ADT Leg Volume. D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service The City of Rancho Cucamonga has established Level of Service (LOS) "D" as the maximum allowable threshold for the intersection operations. Therefore, LOS "E" or "F" is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures. The results of the existing conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 3-1. The existing condition operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix "3.3". As shown on Table 3-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route is currently operating at unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) during the AM peak hour with the existing geometry and traffic controls. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) II FIGURE 3-A EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROLS AND INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS W Q Q o a Q 0° rT/7 a O w SITE I ARROW ROUTE W a z I 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ LEGEND: Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Q =INTERSECTION ID + L FUTURE INTERSECTION =TRAFFIC SIGNAL } } i =STOP SIGN 1 DEF =DEFACTO RIGHT TURN LANE --- =PROJECT DRIVEWAY AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:01.dwg) 12 FIGURE 3-B EXISTING (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES QLJ o a 011 U N 2 Q --1 x w SITE I 0 � ARROW ROUTE O © 23.5 27.3 27.3 26.2 27.6 W Vi a Ln r` Z N LO N AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route �92 LO �78 ^G a —792 —1109 v v —880 LEGEND: Go f--235 f-49 + f-126 FUTURE Q =INTERSECTION ID 64-J } 925� 8P- �l } (' INTERSECTION 17� N N o M on 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000's) 583� M ro� 736� �N o• 106� 144� PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route 0 co i138 �--94 co —723 —1013 o o —88 3 + I- f-186 f-37 + f-118 FUTURE 117-# 1 } 1194— 1 f' 118� } (� INTERSECTION 819— N a 0 16� N N 979— Go 0''o 82� 61� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 13 TABLE 3-1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING (2018) CONDITIONS Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service ID Intersection Control L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 64.9 47.5 E D 2 Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 28.0 24.3 D C 3 Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 39.6 37.2 D D 4 Project Driveway/Arrow Route - Future Intersection - - - - TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left; T=Through; R=Right;d=Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable level of service C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-000146teeFar Wash ReporU3-1 14 Q� 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC This section of the report quantifies the number of trips generated by the proposed project and other known developments in the area. A. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination. Therefore, to account for these trips (termed "ambient growth"), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. A 2% ambient growth rate that has been used in this study to account for traffic not attributed to the project or other planned developments within the study area. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. 2. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development. For the purpose of this analysis, the following land use assumption is evaluated: • An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (101" edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 4-2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37%, PM-35%) and a 5% internal trip ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 15 reduction was assumed. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 4-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES' AM PM LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY IN I OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Automated Car Wash Empirical Data 140 Feet 0.25 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 ' Source: Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta(Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) TABLE 4-2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PEAK HOUR AM PM LAND USE QUANTITY IN I OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction(AM-37%:PM-355,o)' -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction(55,o) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd,Lawndale,CA 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The project's trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution pattern for the project is illustrated on Figure 4-A. 4. Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination. Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project. A 5% reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.Docx) 16 FIGURE 4-A PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION rF p O 0 r m O a SITE 30% ARROW ROUTE O O O O 55% 50% 30% a z 0 0 O 1C! IlJ I< r Irk LEGEND: © =INTERSECTION ID ---- =FUTURE DRIVEWAY 10% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:01.dwg) 17 Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37% and 35% were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Appendix 3.1 contains the survey sheets. 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip generation, trip distribution, proposed arterial highway and local street systems, which would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the site. Based on the identified project traffic generation and distribution, Project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-B. B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 4. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-C and include the following projects: • DRC 20118-000119 (9000 Hellman Ave.)— 174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse • DRC 2013-00565(NE of Archibald/7th)— 171,941 General Industrial • DRC 2017-00654 (SW of Haven/26th)—207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail • DRC 2016-00695(8th/Industrial)— 150,003 sf General Industrial 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation Table 4-3 presents the cumulative development trip generation rates and anticipated cumulative traffic volumes. Table 4-4 indicates that the cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 4,822 trips per day with 465 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 504 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 18 FIGURE 4-B PROJECT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES QQ o a O CD O x a SITE 0 kw r, I i - ARROW ROUTE 0.2 0.3 0.4 0-0 0 4 0.2 � a � O z O z z o AM PEAK HOUR AM PEAK HOUR PASS-BY 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route �-2 �--0 f5 —11 —6 'L-12 4--5 0-# o o 8— 0 2-# o 0 9-# 7-� 6— 1� 5— 0— -7- 0--* 2--� PM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR PASS-BY 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route k--4 �—o —1 1 —15 —9 o o, �--17 4-9 .1 1. f--2 f-0 f-0 - ~0 f-9 0� '1 f 1 g� '1 � 4--4 '1 } (� 14� 9— OON 2- NO 1 1— MOO 0— -lt - 0� 4--� LEGEND: Q =INTERSECTION ID 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000's) NOM =NOMINAL,LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES PER DAY AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 19 FIGURE 4-C CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENTS LOCATION MAP W SITE O I 0 dO— © ARROW ROUTE w ui m z O `0 O x LEGEND: Q =INTERSECTION ID ----- =FUTURE ROADWAY/PROJECT DRIVEWAY O =CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT ID (SEE TABLE 4-4 FOR REFERENCE) AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 20 TABLE 4-3 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION RATES PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES ITE AM PM LAND USE CODE QUANTITY2 IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY General Light Industrial 110 Varies TSF 0.62 0.08 0.70 0.08 0.55 0.63 4.96 Multifamily(Low Rise) 220 207 DU 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 General Office Bldg. 710 1.625 TSF 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 11.03 Shopping Center 820 Varies TSF 1 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.83 1.90 3.73 42.94 1 Source: ITE(Institute of Transportation Engineers)Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition,2017. 2 TSF=Thousand Square Feet;DU=Dwelling Units TABLE 4-4 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PEAK HOUR MAP AM PM ID PROJECT NAME LAND USE QUANTITY' IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Overton Moore 1 Properties(DRC Gen.Lt.Industrial 174.745 TSF 108 14 122 14 96 110 867 2018-00119) SCHEU 2 Management Corp Gen.Lt.Industrial 171.941 TSF 107 14 121 14 95 109 853 (DRC 2013-00565) Charles Joseph Multifamily Housing 207 DU 23 72 95 72 43 115 1,515 3 Assoc. Shopping Center 14.3 TSF 9 6 15 26 27 53 614 (DRC 2017-00654) Pass-by(25%Retail) -2 -2 -4 -7 -6 -13 -154 Subtotal 30 76 106 91 64 155 1,975 Rancho Cucamonga 4 Prop.(DRC 2016- Gen.Lt.Industrial 150.003 TSF 93 12 105 12 83 95 744 00695) Neighboring Property Gen.Office Bldg. 1.625 TSF 2 1 3 1 2 3 18 5 (east of project site) I Shopping Center 8.5 TSF 5 3 8 16 16 32 365 Subtotal 7 4 11 17 18 35 383 Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation 345 120 465 148 356 504 4,822 TSF=Thousand Square Feet;DU=Dwelling Units 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-D through 4-H contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Based on the identified trip distribution for the cumulative development on arterial highways throughout the study area, cumulative development traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-I. Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 44 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStgoggr ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 21 FIGURE 4-D DRC 2018-00119 TRIP DISTRIBUTION o a a 0 j a SITE l ARROW ROUTE O O O 15% 15% W a z 0 O r LEGEND: O =INTERSECTION ID -FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 1 O% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT O =DRC 201 8-001 1 9 AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 22 FIGURE 4-E DRC 2013-00565 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Q � o a a 0 1 a SITE ARROW ROUTE O O I . a z a co r y� 1 LEGEND: O =INTERSECTION ID -FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 10% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT O =DRC 2013-00565 AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 23 FIGURE 4-F DRC 2017-00654 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Q o a a 0 1 a SITE 20% 20% ARROW ROUTE O I . a z a DJ LEGEND: O =INTERSECTION ID —FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 10% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT O =DRC 201 7-00654 AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 24 FIGURE 4-G DRC 2016-00695 TRIP DISTRIBUTION a a i 0 a SITE ARROW ROUTE O O 10% LJ 10% a z a 01 u0 LEGEND: O =INTERSECTION ID —FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 10% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT Oq =DRC 2016-00695 AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 25 FIGURE 4-H NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TRIP DISTRIBUTION J C, o a m 0 U --j a SITE 5 30% 45°o I ——— ARROW ROUTE O ® 0 50% 30% w a z o � O lrJ 1t! � r LEGEND: O =INTERSECTION ID —FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY 10% =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT O =NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:02-cm.dwg) 26 FIGURE 4-1 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES W Q Q o a m N r--1 � UO rY w SITE � I� ARROW ROUTE 0.7 0.8 O 0.8 © 0.8 © 0.7 W a N Z O AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route *--0 4--0 O N �a2 �a3 ^O O �a3 LEGEND: + �0 f-0 + f-0 FUTURE 0—# 12— 7 0-4 1 } (► INTERSECTION � =INTERSECTION ID 11 O M o 0 00 10y —0 0 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000's) 0� 0� PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route i2 i0 —22 —24 —21 O M N N O O + � f-1 �1 + f-0 FUTURE 0—# 1 f 49— 2—# 1 } (► INTERSECTION N 46— O ^ Q O— 46— N O O 0� 2� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 27 FIGURE 4-J OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE (ODAC 2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES W Q Q o a Q � or,- U N w SITE ARROW ROUTE 24.7 28.70 © 28.6 27.5 © 28.9 W a OR 00 z C! LO N AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route 4--94 �80 a —850 —1174 °^L o —941 LEGEND: + f--240 f-50 + f-129 FUTURE Q =INTERSECTION ID 65-J 11 } 956— 7 84-4 1 } (' INTERSECTION 606— M P C-iN 17 N N 761— N 0 a 0•0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000's) 108� �v N 147--� N PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route i143 �--96 a o —759 —1057 M v —922 + f-191 f-39 +� f-120 FUTURE 119-# 1 } 1267— 1 f, 122-# 1 } " INTERSECTION 01 Go 881— �01 16� N N 1045— �0•o 01 84� 64� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 28 Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-K. Horizon Year(2040) Without Project Traffic Volumes are shown on Figure 4-L. The Horizon Year forecasts were based on applying a 2% per year growth rate to the existing traffic volumes and additional traffic from previously identified cumulative development projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 4-M. These forecasts were based on the adding the project traffic to the Horizon Year without Project traffic forecasts. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT�1f,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 29 FIGURE 4-K OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT (ODACP 2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES W Q Q o a Q 0 00 U N 2 .4 w SITE ARROW ROUTE 0 Q 24.9 29 28.9 27.9 29.1 W a � 00 z Cl) LO N AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route 4--96 oLO �80 a —855 —1185 N ,o -94 7 , + 7 �241 f-50 +I f-129 179 LEGEND: 65� � f � 964— � � 86� � f � 16� � =INTERSECTION ID 612— M P Cn N 18 N N 766— N Lo 0 965— 1�.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000's) 108� �v N 149--� w PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route i147 �96 o,o —770 —1072 00 v —931 Lo o �-26 +[' f-193 f-39 +� f-120 �� —1083 199—# 128 1 126 11 } I• 25—#1 10 -# oa 8 56— ,0,0 1294— 84� 68� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 30 FIGURE 4-L HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES W Q Q o a Q h 0 r-- —j I = w I SITE ARROW ROUTE W a z AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route -132 -112 ,oNo —1182 —1640 �vM —1310 LEGEND: + . F-338 f-50 + �- f-181 FUTURE INTERSECTION ID 92-J 11 } (' 1344— 7 118-4 �1 } (� INTERSECTION = 851— o o 17 N N 1070— r.10 co 153--� ,O" 207--� co PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route co i20 N135 coLo co —1063 1483 o 0o —129 f-2693+ O . 1+ f70 FUTURE 168-J } 1768— 172-J INTERSECTION 1225— N v v 16� N cli N 1456� N CO118� 90--� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 31 FIGURE 4-M HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES W Q Q o a Q h 0 r-- -j I _ w I SITE ARROW ROUTE W a z AM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route �134 01 �112 coo —1187 —1651 v M —1316 N �117 LEGEND: +� �339 f-50 �+ f-181 f1649 1352— 120 �1 f 16� =INTERSECTION ID 92 857— a s`r 18 N N 1075— ��M 1360— 153� ,O" 209--� co PM PEAK HOUR 1.Archibald Ave./ 2.Malven Ave./ 3.Hermosa Ave./ 4.Project Dwy./ Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route i205 135 co Ld,o f 1074 —1498 - —1302 �n o �26 + f-271 f-39 ° + f-170 01 �� —1523 168-J f 1786— 1 176-# 1 } f' 25-# 1234— N v v 18� N N 1467— N 00 N Go 1811— 118� � 94� AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:04-vol.dwg) 32 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Peak hour intersection analysis has been performed at the study area intersections for ODAC of the project scenarios and for projected future conditions. Improvements are recommended to satisfy the level of service requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and if the following impacts are identified: 1) Any study intersection that is operating at LOS "A", "B", "C" or "D" for any study scenario without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to a LOS "E" or "F" shall mitigate the impact to bring the intersection back to as least LOS "D" . 2) Any study intersection that is operating at a LOS "E" or "F" for any study scenario without project traffic shall mitigate any impacts so as to bring the intersection back to the overall level of delay established prior to project traffic being added.. A. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions The results of the ODAC conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-1. The ODAC conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix "5.1". As shown on Table 5-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is projected to continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn at the Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route intersection is improve intersection delay to acceptable level of service (LOS "D" or better). B. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions The results of the ODACP conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-2. The ODACP conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix "5.2". As shown on Table 5-4, no new intersections are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse), in addition to the deficient intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route as previously identified under Existing and ODAC 2019 conditions, with existing geometry and traffic controls. The separate southbound right turn improvement identified under ODAC conditions for the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to improve intersection LOS to acceptable level of service (LOS "D" or better). C. Horizon Year(2040)Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-3. The Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix "5.3". As shown on Table 5-3, the following ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT�1g,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 33 TABLE 5-1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOF OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE (2019) CONDITIONS Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service ID Intersection Control L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 70.6 52.8 E D -With Improvements' TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 54.2 51.4 D D 2 Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 30.6 26.3 D D 3 Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 39.8 38.7 D D 4 Project Driveway/Arrow Route Future Intersection - I TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left; T=Through; R=Right;d=Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable level of service C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-Cpgb orEWWash Report.xlsx/5-1 34 Q� TABLE 5-2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE PLUS POJECT(2019) CONDITIONS Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Traffic Northbound ESouthbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service3 ID Intersection Control L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Archibald Ave)Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 71.3 53.9 E D -With Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 54.7 52.5 D D 2 Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 31.5 27.9 D D 3 Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 40.1 39.5 D D 4 Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 23.7 30.3 C D TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left; T=Through; R=Right;d=Defacto right turn lane;1=Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable level of service C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-0pg orM7Wash Report.xlsx/5-2 35 �� TABLE 5-3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORIZON YEAR(2040)WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service3 ID Intersection Control L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 119.6 116.6 F F -With Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 94.3 107.8 F F 2 Malven Ave./Arrow Route4.5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 37.9 57.3 E F 3 Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 51.6 52.6 D D 4 Project Driveway/Arrow Route Future Intersection - TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left; T=Through; R=Right;d=Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach(northbound left tun movement)is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-cpg orMeash Report.xlsx/5-3 36 �� study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls: • Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route (#1) • Malven Avenue/Arrow Route (#2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-3 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS "E" or worse. D. Horizon Year(2040)With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-4. The Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix "5.4". As shown on Table 5-4, the Project Driveway/Arrow Route (#4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. Similar to Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersections of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-4 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS "E" or worse. For the Project Driveway/Arrow Route (#3) intersection, restricting the driveway to a right- in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT ,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 37 TABLE 5-4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORIZON YEAR(2040)WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service3 ID Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM I PM 1 Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 120.2 118.2 F F -With Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 95.4 114.9 F F 2 Malven Ave./Arrow Route4,5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 39.7 62.8 E F 3 Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 52.3 53.3 D D 4 Project Driveway/Arrow Route CSS 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 48.8 46.8 E E With RIR0/LI Access CSS 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 17.9 17.2 C C TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left; T=Through; R=Right;d=Defacto right turn lane;1=Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach(northbound left tun movement)is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. 6 RIRO/LI=Right-In/Right-Out/Left-In Only Driveway C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-cpg orobNash Report.xlsx/5-4 38 �� 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis For Existing (2018), ODAC (2019), and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) is operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn lane is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2) are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) during the peak hours. Further improvements in addition to the improvements previously identified under ODAC (2019) conditions are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS "E" or worse. For Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (#4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service. Restricting the Project driveway to a right-in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site Figure 6-A illustrates the on-site recommended roadway and intersection lane improvements. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below. • Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. • On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. • Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMEStg0gT0f,INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUD REPORT.DOCX) 39 FIGURE 6-A CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS --r°o_1 -�- - N Euxo iEuanx�v $I �— I.i I m I 1 Is I I_� � I aE.FExx��l, i CDa! uxgetnRxo — I , m cexBE VN II � WRLK 'N I J r 9 e _---- ___ I$ I oE.aEor�„E� Itne�vr) UI a dA so o EE aaE wux axe m i CE � o �E ta 3 I w COMYON- ___---_—_ __—__--_—__----__---'. -- ----_LP. AP jwmH N ARROW ROUTE PROVIDE STOP SIGN CONTROL AT THE PROJECT DRIVEWAY. LEGEND: ON-SITE TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETAILED =STOP SIGN CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT. L =LANE IMPROVEMENT(PROJECT ACCESS) VERIFY THAT MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE IS PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT ACCESS POINT. AN Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. Rancho Cucamonga,CA(0301-0001:01.dwg) 40 Appendix H Infiltration Testing Report Page 893 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 894 1225 Chestnut Street R E n gin cc ring Upland, California 91784 G e o l o g y ckrall@aol.com (951)315-3517 September 12, 2018 Allan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 SUBJECT: REPORT OF INFILTRATION TESTING Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, California Project No. 1702-01 Mr. Smith: In accordance with your authorization, we have conducted infiltration testing for low impact development (LID) design associated with the proposed site improvements. Our test procedures and content of this report conform to the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations related to site infiltration are presented herein. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, or require additional services, please call our office. Respectfully submitted, RGS Engineering Geology �w'� "E 'o tr r�"No.CEG�Btis rP ' CERTIFIED ' E.NGINEEEW * GEOROWT jr� dP+RES1;.1•� �. Ch tistcqphe. rall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816GEneri g Geologist Geologic Evaluation O Fault/Seismic Studies O Environmental Assessments O Infiltration Testing Page 895 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 INTRODUCTION Accompanying Map, Illustrations, And Appendices Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Infiltration Test Location Plan Appendix A - References Appendix B - Exploratory Trench Logs Appendix C - Infiltration Test Data Scope of Work For the purpose of this study RGS conducted the following scope or work in accordance with written authorization: • Review related geologic and soils information available in our files. • Excavate, log, and backfill two deep exploratory trenches on-site to evaluate the underlying soil condition to a maximum depth of 15 feet. • Excavate a total of two shallow test pits to a depth near the bottom of the proposed basin for infiltration testing. • Prepare each test pit for infiltration testing. • Conduct two field infiltration tests to determine the representative rate to be used for storm water mitigation design. Testing utilized the Riverside County percolation test method in conformance with the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Documents for Water Quality Management. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and geologic recommendations for storm water basin design. Purpose and Objective The purpose and objective of testing is to determine the rate of storm water infiltration for native sediments exposed along the bottom of proposed retention basins associated with site improvements at the proposed Arbor Carwash Express in Rancho Cuca Monga, California. Best management practices utilize drawdown time based on infiltration rate combined with the interaction of chemical, physical, and biological processes between soil, organic matter, and water to filter out sediments and constituents from surface run- off and storm water. Accordingly, best management practices require a maximum RGS Engineering Geology Pa ftW62 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 drawdown time to provide proper filtration and avoid nuisance issues. Since drawdown time is contingent on the infiltration rate of the underlying soil, tests are used to help establish the vertical infiltration rate of the soil below a proposed infiltration facility. The test methods attempt to simulate the physical processes and seasonal variance that will occur when the facility is in operation. The established infiltration rate combined with calculated storm water flow is then used by the project engineer to design the low impact development best management practice for water quality suited to the particular project. Site Conditions and Location The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route just east of Archibald Avenue in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The geographical relationship of the site and surrounding area is shown on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. Most of the site is currently vacant with a small residence located near the center of the property. Access for infiltration testing was limited due to the existence of the home. However, the soil conditions in the area tested are considered representative of the infiltration basin and the site as a whole based on the local geology. Topography in the area of the proposed improvements is generally flat with a gradient of less than 2 percent toward the south-southwest. The area is void of shrubs or trees with only a sparse growth of seasonal weeds and grasses observed. Proposed Development The proposed site improvements include an express carwash with associated landscaping, hardscape, and buildings. Low impact design for storm water quality includes a water run-off retention basin near the south-central portion of the site. The proposed improvements and low impact development facilities are shown on depicted on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SITE EVALUATION AND TESTING Subsurface Evaluation To evaluate the subsurface conditions below the proposed retention basin and infiltration trench, two exploratory trench excavations (one at each infiltration facility) were conducted using Case 580 M rubber tired backhoe equipped with a 24 inch wide bucket to a depth of at least 10 feet below the proposed basin or trench invert. The number of exploratory excavations was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Each excavation was carefully monitored by our state licensed Engineering Geologist, Christopher Krall, who prepared a log of the soil column, encountered and collected representative soil samples for field classification as warranted. Geologic conditions RGS Engineering Geology Pa ftV73 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 related to infiltration such as soil texture, density, and moisture content was recorded. Soil color and mottling or staining and groundwater occurrence were also noted. A copy of the exploratory trench logs is provided in Append B of this report for review. The exploratory trenches were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. Infiltration Test Method Our field test method for infiltration was conducted in conformance with Appendix A of the Riverside County Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our test method followed the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. This test measures the length of time required for a quantity of water to infiltrate into the soil and is often called a "percolation rate". It should be noted that the percolation rate is related to, but not equal to, the infiltration rate. While an infiltration rate is a measure of the speed at which water progresses downward into the soil, the percolation rate measures not only the downward progression but the lateral progression through the soil as well. This reflects the fact that the surface area for infiltration testing would include only the horizontal surface while the percolation test includes both the bottom surface area and the sidewalls of the test hole. However, there is a relationship between the values obtained by a percolation test and infiltration rate expressed by the following equation known as the Porchet Method of converting percolation rate to infiltration rate. It = AH 600 At (r+2Havg) Where: It = tested infiltration rate (inches/hour) OH = change in head over the time interval, inches At = time interval, minutes r = effective radius of test hole Havg = average head over the time interval, inches Test Preparation and Procedure Test pits were excavated at each proposed infiltration facilities (two for the proposed basin and two for the proposed trench) to a depth of two to three feet below the exiting ground surface to replicate the bottom of the infiltration facility. The number of test pits was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Along the bottom of each test pit a test hole was excavated to a depth of 22 to 24 inches with a diameter of approximately 8 inches. A six inch diameter perforated plastic pipe and 2 inches of gravel was placed in each test hole to prevent scouring or erosion. RGS Engineering Geology Pa ft Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 A water container was inverted over each test hole and 5 gallons of clean water was allowed to soak into the soil prior to testing. Pre-soaking of the test holes was performed to emulate possible saturated conditions during seasonal storms. Where pre-soaking of the test holes was complete in a timely manner, testing was conducted immediately following the pre-soak. Where pre-soaking was slower, testing was conducted the following day. Under no circumstance was presoaking allowed to continue for more than 26 hours. Following the presoak, test holes were filled with clear water to a height of 20 inches (5 times the test-hole radius) and the time required for the water to seep into the soil was recorded. All measurements were taken from a fixed reference point using a ruler placed within the test hole and are accurate to 0.25 inches. When 2 consecutive measurements indicated that 6 inches of water seeps into the soil in less than 25 minutes, the strata was classified as "sandy soil" and testing continued for an additional hour with measurements taken every 10 minutes. The drop that occurs during the final 10 minutes was used to calculate the field percolation rate. In non-sandy material at least twelve measurements were recorded over a period of at least six hours at approximately 30 minutes intervals. The final reading was used to calculate the field percolation rate. The test pits were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. At the completion of testing, a 3 feet long surveyor's stake (lath), flagged with highly visible banner tape was placed in the location of the test indicating date, test hole number, and the company performing the test. The approximate location of each test pit is shown on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND TEST RESULTS Earth Material The earth material underlying the infiltration areas is summarized below. Detailed descriptions of the soil characteristics are provided on our exploratory trench logs, Appendix B. In summary the subsurface conditions below each proposed infiltration areas are similar and expose silty sand (Unified Soil Classification—SM)that is yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, medium dense, non-cohesive, moderately graded, with a slight blocky soil structure. Soil stratigraphy is generally consistent to a depth of 15 feet or more. Groundwater Occurrence Groundwater was encountered in both of our exploratory trench excavation at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. RGS Engineering Geology Pa~5 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 In general, groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface and groundwater is not expected to impact this development. Test Results Our field test data is presented in Appendix C for review and summarized in Table I below. The percolation rate of the earth material underlying the infiltration areas yields good percolation rates ranging from 1.12 to 1.16 minutes per inch. These values were converted to infiltration rate following the Porchet Method equation as explained in the previous section of this report. TABLE 1 Tabulated Percolation/Infiltration Test Results Test No. Location Interval Tested Earth Materials Perc. Rate Infilt. Rate (inches) (min/inch) (inch/hour) P-1 See Plan 34"-54" Silty Sand(SM) 1.12 6.91 P-2 See Plan 37"-57" Silty Sand(SM) 1.16 6.75 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions • Based on our investigation, the areas of proposed infiltration are underlain by silty sand (SM) that is considered permeable with moderate to good percolation rates to a depth of 15 feet below the ground surface. • Groundwater was not encountered in each exploratory trench at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater is not expected to impact the development or infiltration process. • A field infiltration rate of 6.75 inches per hour is considered representative of the underlying native soil and should be considered the standard for design of the low impact development system. • Considering the location and geologic setting of the site, installation of the proposed LID BMP will not create adverse effects to slope stability, soil erosion, off-site impacts. RGS Engineering Geology PaQ06 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr.Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12,2018 Recommendations • The low impact development system should be designed by the project engineer considering the geologic information and field infiltration rate contained in this report. • All required setbacks as set forth in the design handbook should be adhered to during site planning, design, and construction. • To account for long term performance variables of full scale working infiltration facilities due to accumulation of fine particles, post construction compaction of native soil, non-homogeneous soil strata, and site variations, a safety factor of 3 should be applied to the infiltration rate for design purposes. • Future building expansion or other improvements in the area of the infiltration system, including hardscape, flatwork sidewalks or paving, and water wells, should be reviewed by this firm and approved by the local governing agency. CLOSURE It is the owner's responsibility to insure that proper design and construction methods of the infiltration LID system are employed. Improper placement or construction of the system can cause premature failure regardless of the soil conditions. It is also the owner's responsibility to adequately maintain this infiltration system to extend its longevity and performance. Please understand that this investigation was limited to the evaluation and feasibility of soil infiltration rates and has not included a comprehensive analysis of the stability of the proposed development from a geotechnical standpoint. RGS Engineering Geology Pa17 6/14/2018 Google Maps Go gle Maps SITE LOCATION MAP- Figure 1 En Yff gh School Paul V 7 ETIWANDA GRAPE LAND UP1.4d H,lk o? Ml LDII Hlghl�llll tourahy Cerra'al Pork 6-- F'0xl Al—103A 0 RW Hill P.. Z Catle Al—t WEST END Vr The Eacl- -h.E l.LOS OLWOS. RWHHIC.11ryCl�q 7.—V—T—E— 9 ,J F. COLLEGE R.—h. U,I.,d High&l.1 9 1 C—....g. W enm aouw wanmv Hvry �. WMwv srrm, v l.rwvgeaee A oleo awe £ rn.aver Nrn arinv arras acute Mron qun -h. Upland U.— DMv Cl PFwaa U.P-y ..RT.'U GAMONDA ..l.i, m-0h*—lUMhVD--HM 1.7 6mll z wow mho a�,emlaw H,h School JDh. b li'll9C"I.S.l"P Vbulbn Cen1w—wo B 1 N, C-1 GUASTI DELL RACIVO f ..UT..— DUSTRIAL PARK ..'04 c 9 Y c gle GATEWAY Map data @2018 Google 2000 ft 1 Page 902 https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0974207,-117.5923378,14z 1/1 EXISTING SCHOOL REVISIONS EXISTING ACCESS ROAD 2V BOX MULTI-TRUNK ' CAMPNEATREEED, OC fSTAGGEREo1 128 G4 10 o � 0 a I, .LANDSCAPE0',-, - � -p of=m EUSRNGPARKINGLOT. j WNW c 5 EXIT Z m DRIVEWpm o a0. TRAsw ro NN I REC/ClE 186 . ' LAND.RBPPE. I ; ADA ACCE$3 f0 RED — CARW I_n c O yo - s OWE. N Y y Q pUp mZ o L8 q 2 7vq, 3u43 a3u+G r�Na . Q^ 0 ➢ I. FIN..SERVICE p o DHNE STATION J. n Q 5114 11W 11'-Ia° 5'-6 V`. m I I L DUAL CENTER 19 20' (-•-- U4 EXISTING - 2'..1421ISO.1U. NOT A PART 'LS n -•- OFNE �J M�,�•��,. O N ESCAPE, fOUNTNN •J PGS,. I CONOGN DPdVE _ • EN ARRTNEO POS„ ENTRANCECE R 'Q in LG. MONU SIGN r LANDSCAPE V .. .. .. NMAPPROIACH .144 REMOVE REMOVE 9TS0 9m PERCRTSTDS EXISTING EXISTING APPROACH APPROACH N ARROW ROUTE R 5 1'-20 SUMMARY (9744,9760 ARROW ROUTE) ` BUILDINGS(COMBINED)FOOTPRINT 5867 SOFT. LANDSCAPING(25%) 15,455 SOFT. CONCRETE 40,766 SOFT. u•I.1"=20' SITE TOTAL(1.42 ACRES) 68,088 SO.FT.' PARKING � T bor VACUUMS 33 STALLS Page 90aARWASH •_� CUSTOMER/EMPLOYEE 15 STALLS EXPRESS SITE PLAN - LOADING(14!X27') , 1STALL DI s— uva uuwwm �R90ft APPENDIX A References RGS Engineering Geology Page 904 REFERENCES Carson, Scott E. and Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 Franks, Alvin, I., 1972, "Geology for Individual Sewage Disposal Systems," in California Geology, Volume 25, Number 9, September 1972, pp. 195-203 Heath, Ralph C., 1987, "Basic Groundwater Hydrology", United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Kaplan, Benjamin O., 1988, "Septic Systems Handbook", Lewis Publishers, Second Printing 1988, 283 pp. Riverside County Flood Control District, 2001, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices, Revised September 2011. San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. RGS Engineering Geology Page 905 APPENDIX B Exploratory Trench Logs RGS Engineering Geology Page 906 EXPLORA TOR Y TRENCH LOG PROJECT NAME Arbor Carwash ELEVATION NA TRENCH NO. T-1 PROJECT No. 1702-01 EQUIPMENT _CASE 580 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION z H H y w LOGGED BY CK DATE 6-13-18 x o a A F W SAMPLED BY CK U U O P A F Q a U U W Alluvium (Qal) NG 94.1 3.6 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): BULK Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 105.2 4.8 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive, 5 Slight blocky structure 5 10 10 15 15 Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG Trend: Scale: V=5' *TEST SYMBOLS B- BULK SAMPLE R- RING SAMPLE SC- SANDCONE MD-MAXIMUM DENSITY GS- GRAIN SIZE SE- SAND EQUIVALENT NG-NUCLEAR GAUGE (90)-RELATIVE COMPACTION RGSEngineering Geology Page 907 EXPLORA TOR Y TRENCH LOG PROJECT NAME Arbor Carwash ELEVATION NA TRENCH NO. T-2 PROJECT No. 1702-01 EQUIPMENT _CASE 580 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION z H H y w LOGGED BY CK DATE 6-13-18 x o a A F W SAMPLED BY CK U U O P A F Q a U U W Alluvium (Qal) NG 93.8 3.9 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 107.4 5.1 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive, 5 Slight blocky structure 5 10 10 15 15 Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG Trend: Scale: V=5' *TEST SYMBOLS B- BULK SAMPLE R- RING SAMPLE SC- SANDCONE MD-MAXIMUM DENSITY GS- GRAIN SIZE SE- SAND EQUIVALENT NG-NUCLEAR GAUGE (90)-RELATIVE COMPACTION RGSEngineering Geology Page 908 APPENDIX C. Infiltration Test Data RGS Engineering Geology Page 909 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Project: I Excel Transport Project No: 1653-01 Date: 11/16/2016 Test Hole No: 1 1-1 Tested By: Christopher Krall Depth of Test(DT): 20"-32" USCS Soil Classification: Silty Sand (SM) Test Hole Radius (inches): 4 Depth of Test Hole(in.) 20 SANDY SOIL CRITERIA TEST* Time Initial Depth Final Depth Interval to Water to Water Water Level Greater than or Equal to 6" Trial No. Start(t) Stop (t) (min.) (in.) (in.) Change (in.) (y/n) 1 6:15 6:30 15 10 2 8 Yes 2 6:30 6:45 15 10 2 8 Yes If two consecutive measurments demonstrate that 6 inches of water seeps into soil in less than 25 minutes,the test shall be run for an additional hour with measurements taken every 10 minutes. Otherwise,test holes were pre-soaked overnight and at least twleve measurements were recorded over a 6 hour period (approximately 30 minute intervals). (At)Time (Do)Initial (DF) Final (OH)Water Percolation Reading Interval Depth to Depth to Head Level Rate Infiltration Rate No. Start(t) Stop (t) (min.) Water(in.) Water(in.) Change(in.) (min./in.) (in./hr.) 1 11:55 12:05 10 11 2 9 1.11 6.97 2 12:05 12:15 10 11 2 1 9 1.11 6.97 3 12:15 12:25 10 11 2.1 8.9 1.12 6.91 4 12:25 12:35 10 11 2.1 8.9 1.12 6.91 5 12:35 12:45 10 11 2.2 8.8 1.14 6.86 6 12:45 12:55 10 11 2.1 8.9 1.12 6.91 7 8 9 10 11 12 Comments: Page 910 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Project: I Excel Transport Project No: 1653-01 Date: 11/16/2016 Test Hole No: I P-2 Tested By: Christopher Krall Depth of Test(DT): 20"-32" USCS Soil Classification: Silty Sand (SM) Test Hole Radius (inches): 4 Depth of Test Hole(in.) 20 SANDY SOIL CRITERIA TEST* Time Initial Depth Final Depth Interval to Water to Water Water Level Greater than or Equal to 6" Trial No. Start(t) Stop (t) (min.) (in.) (in.) Change (in.) (y/n) 1 7:05 7:13 8 3 9.25 6.25 Yes 2 7:14 7:23 9 3.25 9.3 6.05 Yes If two consecutive measurments demonstrate that 6 inches of water seeps into soil in less than 25 minutes,the test shall be run for an additional hour with measurements taken every 10 minutes. Otherwise,test holes were pre-soaked overnight and at least twleve measurements were recorded over a 6 hour period (approximately 30 minute intervals). (At)Time (Do)Initial (DF) Final (OH)Water Percolation Reading Interval Depth to Depth to Head Level Rate Infiltration Rate No. Start(t) Stop (t) (min.) Water(in.) Water(in.) Change(in.) (min./in.) (in./hr.) 1 11:55 12:05 10 11 2 9 1.11 6.97 2 12:05 12:15 10 11 2.1 1 8.9 1.12 6.91 3 12:15 12:25 10 11 2.2 8.8 1.14 6.86 4 12:25 12:35 10 11 2.3 8.7 1.15 6.80 5 12:35 12:45 10 11 2.4 8.6 1.16 6.75 6 12:45 12:55 10 11 2.4 8.6 1.16 6.75 7 8 9 10 11 12 Comments: Page 911 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project State Clearinghouse No. N/A June 15, 2020 Page 912 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Page 913 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) identifies Mitigation Measures incorporated into the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project(Project). For each Mitigation Measure, the MMRP identifies the significant impact, the related mitigation measure, the implementation entity, the monitoring and verification entity, and timing requirements. Arbor Express Car Wash 1 June 8, 2020 Page 914 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This Page Intentionally Left Blank 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 91 5 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potential Impacts BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to on Migratory If vegetation removal is scheduled during the Cucamonga vegetation Nesting Birds. nesting season (typically February 1 to Planning removal. September 1), then a focused survey for active Department nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil,equipment,and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors,surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area(in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500- foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs,an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey,a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be Arbor Express Car Wash 3 June 8, 2020 Page 916 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests,and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non- anthro o enic nest failure). CULTURAL RESOURCS Adverse Change in SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of resources are discovered during project activities, Cucamonga Throughout an Archeological all work in the immediate vicinity of the find(within Planning Excavation/ Resource. a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified Department/Tribal Ground archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior Representatives Disturbing standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work Activities. on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period.Additionally, the San Manuel 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 917 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4,if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Adverse Change in SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, Cucamonga Throughout an Archeological 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be Planning Excavation/ Resource. ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Department/Tribal Ground Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of Representatives Disturbing which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and Activities. comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. Adverse Change in GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall Cucamonga Throughout an Archeological be required to retain and compensate for the Planning Excavation/ Resource. services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both Department/Tribal Ground approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Representatives Disturbing Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is Activities. listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement Arbor Express Car Wash 5 June 8, 2020 Page 918 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Adverse Change in GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon Cucamonga Throughout an Archeological discovery of any archaeological resources, cease Planning Excavation/ Resource. construction activities in the immediate vicinity of Department/Tribal Ground the find until the find can be assessed. All Representatives Disturbing archaeological resources unearthed by project Activities. construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 919 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" or "unique archaeological resource", time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. Adverse Change in GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Sections 21083.2(b)for unique archaeological Cucamonga Throughout an Archeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., Planning Excavation/ Resource. avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. Department/Tribal Ground If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment Representatives Disturbing may include implementation of archaeological Activities. data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Arbor Express Car Wash 7 June 8, 2020 Page 920 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Adverse Change in CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Training for Construction Personnel. The Cucamonga Throughout a Paleontological Applicant shall retain a professional Planning Excavation/ Resource. paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set Department Ground forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Disturbing shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Activities. Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities,and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Adverse Change in CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Spot Checks During Grading and Earth- Cucamonga Throughout a Paleontological Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a Planning Excavation/ Resource. professional paleontologist, who meets the Department Ground qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Disturbing Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Activities. Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 921 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth- moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. Adverse Change in CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of and Implement Treatment Plan if Cucamonga Throughout a Paleontological Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. Planning Excavation/ Resource. In the event that paleontological resources and or Department Ground Arbor Express Car Wash 9 June 8, 2020 Page 922 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity unique geological features are unearthed during Disturbing ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing Activities. activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist,who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist's discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. Adverse Change in CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and the Significance of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the Cucamonga Throughout a Paleontological above activities, the professional paleontologist Planning Excavation/ Resource. shall prepare a report summarizing the results of Department Ground the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the Disturbing methodology used in these efforts, as well as a Activities. description of the fossils collected and their 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 923 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. Disturbance of SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. objects are encountered during any activities Cucamonga Throughout associated with the project,work in the immediate Planning Excavation/ vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall Department/Tribal Ground cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted Representatives Disturbing pursuant to State Health and Safety Code Activities. §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. Disturbance of GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. Human Remains and Associated Funerary Cucamonga Throughout Objects: Native American human remains are Planning Excavation/ defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation Department/Tribal Ground or cremation,and in any state of decomposition or Representatives Disturbing skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called Activities. associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by Arbor Express Car Wash 11 June 8, 2020 Page 924 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Disturbance of GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon Cucamonga Throughout discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological Planning Excavation/ monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately Department/Tribal Ground divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an Representatives Disturbing exclusion zone around the burial. The Activities. monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe,the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American.The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent MLD . Disturbance of GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Cucamonga Throughout Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation is Planning Excavation/ designated MLD, the following treatment Department/Tribal Ground measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe,the Representatives Disturbing term "human remains" encompasses more than Activities. human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. 12 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 925 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture,are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Disturbance of GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. continuation of ground disturbing activities, the Cucamonga Throughout land owner shall arrange a designated site Planning Excavation/ location within the footprint of the project for the Department/Tribal Ground respectful reburial of the human remains and/or Representatives Disturbing ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered Activities. human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and Arbor Express Car Wash 13 June 8, 2020 Page 926 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity.There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. Disturbance of GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Human Remains. Archaeological and Native American monitoring Cucamonga Throughout and excavation during construction projects will Planning Excavation/ 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 927 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity be consistent with current professional standards. Department/Tribal Ground All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary Representatives Disturbing disturbance, physical modification, or separation Activities. of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. NOISE Generation of NO1-1: The following measures are required Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to Issuance Noise Levels in during construction to reduce noise impacts Cucamonga of Grading Excess of Local associated with construction: Planning Permits. Standards During Department Construction Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to,5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Arbor Express Car Wash 15 June 8, 2020 Page 928 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise- generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center)during construction. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited. • Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance. • The Project will designate a "construction liaison" that will be responsible for 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 929 020 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity responding to any local complaints about construction noise.The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site. If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Generation of NO1-2: The car wash dryer system shall not Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to Issuance Noise Levels in exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five(5)feet and Cucamonga of Occupancy Excess of Local shall be set back within the car wash tunnel Planning Permits. Standards During approximately eight(8)feet from the exit allowing Department Operation the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room Arbor Express Car Wash 17 June 8, 2020 Page 930 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity equipped with passive rooftop ventilation.The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Adverse Change in SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a Indians Cultural Resources Department(SMBMI) Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any Planning Excavation/ Resource. pre-contact resources discovered during project Department/Tribal Ground implementation, and be provided information Representatives Disturbing regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Activities. Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow fora monitorto be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. Adverse Change in SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a documents created as a part of the project(isolate Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural records, site records, survey reports, testing Planning Excavation/ Resource. reports,etc.)shall be supplied to the applicant and Department/Tribal Ground Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Representatives Disturbing Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, Activities. consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. 18 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8 2020 Page 01 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Adverse Change in TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a Sensitivity Training for Construction Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Planning Excavation/ Resource. professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Department/Tribal Ground Secretary of the Interior's Professional Representatives Disturbing Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Activities. Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities.The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor,under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Adverse Change in TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a Resources Spot Checks during grading and Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall Planning Excavation/ Resource. retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Department/Tribal Ground Secretary of the Interior's Professional Representatives Disturbing Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Activities. Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a Arbor Express Car Wash 19 June 8, 2020 Page 932 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations(e.g.,grading,trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8 2020 Page 03 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Adverse Change in TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the Planning Excavation/ Resource. event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed Department/Tribal Ground during ground-disturbing activities, ground- Representatives Disturbing disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted Activities. away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated.A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area.All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Arbor Express Car Wash 21 June 8, 2020 Page 934 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Monitoring IMPACT Implementation and Timing Signature Date Entity Verification Requirements g Entity Adverse Change in TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Project Proponent City of Rancho Prior to and Significance of a Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under Cucamonga Throughout Tribal Cultural the direction of a qualified professional Planning Excavation/ Resource. archaeologist who meets the U.S.Secretary of the Department/Tribal Ground Interior's Professional Qualifications and Representatives Disturbing Standards, shall prepare a final report at the Activities. conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center,the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8 2020 Page 05 RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00533, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR ONE 0.85 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 1.21 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0208-291-01 —02 AND -03. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018-00533 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06-acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land are currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South ��Fa mmercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District mily Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Page 936 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 —ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District West Service Station General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 — "Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 — Non-operational but approved for reactivation C. This amendment will change the land use for three parcels of land. Parcel 0208- 291-01 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Parcels 0208- 291-01 and -02 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential; and d. This amendment necessitates amending the Zoning Map (DRC2018-00534) to change zoning designation of one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and of two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest as it is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's carwash needs and will support the surrounding community's needs as Arrow Route are identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The development of a car wash on the two project- related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. b. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not negatively impact the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and C. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan and zoning designation for two non-project related parcels Page 937 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 —ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 (208-29-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District; and d. The 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 VS 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will in turn make the project compliant with the no-net-loss provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166); and e. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment will change the zoning designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for two adjacent parcels of land (APN: 0208- 291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Page 938 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 —ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018- 00533, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2O21. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 939 RESOLUTION NO. 21-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00534, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FOR ONE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR 1.22 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -- APNS: 0208-291-01 —02 AND -03. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2018-00534, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2020-00534 and issued Resolution No. 21-16 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2020-00533 be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06-acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land are currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial GC District Site Single-Famiiy Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District Page 940 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-16 ZMA DRC2018-00534—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial GC District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' I Residential District West Service Station' I General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 —"Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2— Non-operational but approved for reactivation C. This amendment changes the zoning designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low:Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for two non-project specific adjacent parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and - 02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District; and d. This amendment necessitates amending the General Plan Land Use Map (DRC2018-00533) to change land use designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC) and for two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) to Medium (M) Residential District. e. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 to change the land use designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Design Review DRC2018-00535 for the site plan, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 and design of the facility and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 to remove onsite trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. With approval of Zoning Map amendment DRC2018-00534, the project will be compatible with the existing and future land uses surrounding the project site. The proposed car wash is designed to reduce impacts on the surrounding land uses.The vehicle entrance to the car wash will be shared with the adjacent service station and will be approximately 270 feet from the nearest residential land use. Noise making equipment related to the car wash and vacuum stations will be located within an enclosed equipment room, reducing noise levels below the maximum noise levels permitted for a residential land use. The car wash building will be positioned on a north-south axis, further reducing any potential noise or light impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center provides a buffer between the proposed carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. The proposed General Commercial designation is compatible with the General Commercial designation to the south. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments increasing the permitted residential density of the non-project related parcel to the east will also not impact the continued use of the existing single- family residence (Beverly Hills House) for residential purpose; and Page 941 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-16 ZMA DRC2018-00534—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed Zoning Map amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's carwash needs and will support the surrounding community's needs as Arrow Route is identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2A states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The development of a car wash on the two project-related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by .permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site; and C. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not affect the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments, wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains .the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to,allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and d. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity, the applicant is requesting to amend.the General Plan and zoning designation for two non-project related parcels (208-29-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low:Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District; and e. The 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium(LM) Residential District (4-8.dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related, parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the'zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 VS 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will in turn make the project compliant with the no-net-loss provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166); and f. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment will change the zoning designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for two adjacent parcels of land (APN: 0208- 291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained' in the proposed Mitigated Negative Page 942 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-16 ZMA DRC2018-00534—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission, therefore, recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2018-00534, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 943 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-16 ZMA DRC2018-00534—ALAN SMITH March 10,.2021 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2O21. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Z'z"'� BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: 4"Lz* G Anne McIntosh, AICP, SecTPIng I,Anne Mcintosh;AICP, Secretary of t e Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, OAXACA, MORALES, WILLIAMS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DOPP ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 944 RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT CARWASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 SQUARE FOOT DETAILING CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2018-00535, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South ��Fa mmercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District mily Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Page 945 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 —ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District West Service Station General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 — "Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 — Non-operational but approved for reactivation d. The project is for the development of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center; and e. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 40 parking spaces, 24 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 16 parking spaces; and b. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 to operate the carwash and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 to remove onsite trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed carwash will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, which will amend the General Plan land use designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136)from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC); and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Carwash facilities are permitted within the General Commercial (GC) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project will be in compliance with the Zoning Map with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District. Carwash facilities are a conditionally permitted use within the General Commercial (GC) District. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project complies with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking and design; and Page 946 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than- significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2018-00535 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. Page 947 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 —ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2O21. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 948 RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2018-00536, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 DETAIL CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL(GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00536, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public,testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM)'Residential district; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial GC District Site Single-Family Low Medium.Residential Low Medium(LM) Residence Residential District. North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District Page 949 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP DRC2018-00536—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial GC District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence" Residential District West I Service Station General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 —"Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2— Non-operational but approved for reactivation d. The project is for the development and operation of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center; and e. The carwash and detail center will employ approximately 25 full and part-time employees with 7 persons on the largest shift for both the carwash and detail center. The facility will operate 7 days per week from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with customers staying in their vehicle during the car washing and drying process; and f. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 40 parking spaces, 24 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 16 parking spaces; and b. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Design Review DRC2018-00535 for the site plan and design of the facility and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019- 00218 to remove onsite trees. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the.specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of one of the parcels that make up the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, carwashes are a permitted land use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed car wash is compliant with each of the applicable development standards of the Development Code; and b. That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use. including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is suitable for a car wash land use as it provides appropriate site access, has all. utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development Page 950 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP DRC2018-00536—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 standards for a carwash facility; and C. That granting,the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Subject to the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the proposed carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety„ convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the;project is located. The.project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. 3. Based upon .the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment. for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") .and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project; which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on .the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided ,public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the 'imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based. on these findings, the Planning. Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and' considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and -all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. Page 951 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP.DRC2018-00536—ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 4. Based,upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1., 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. 2) A[I conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 20-XX for Design Review DRC2018-00535 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2O21. PLANNING COMM ION OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: " Tony uglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: JAU rn L' Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at,.a regular meeting"of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, OAXACA, MORALES, WILLIAMS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DOPP ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 952 RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218 A REQUEST TO REMOVE 17 TREES RELATED TO A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT CARWASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 SQUARE FOOT DETAILING CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS 'IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0208-291-03.AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and. b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and :85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial GC District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence 'Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial GC District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low L Residential District Page 953 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC2019-00218 —ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 2 Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District West Service Station General Commercial General Commercial GC District 1 — "Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, '1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2— Non-operational but.approved for reactivation d. Tree Removal Permit DRC201'9-00218 is for the removal-of 17 trees. An Arborist Report (Steve Anderson; Arborist) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the 17 onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal; and e. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC201`8-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two,off-site parcels of land, Design Review DRC2018-00535 for the design and site plan review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 to operate the carwash. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tree. Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related carwash and detail center (Design Review DRC2018-00535) will be. consistent with the General Plan with the approval of the related General Plan amendment to change the land use designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC). The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 131-unit mixed- use development; and b. The proposed Tree Removal'Permit will be in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the .district in which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated with the development of the project site. In this case, removal of the trees is necessary to construct a related 5,078 square foot carwash and associated. 1,296 square foot detailing center. The Arborist Report submitted for the project (Steve Anderson, Arborist) concluded that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal; and C. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a,species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed. The removed trees will be replaced by 42 trees as part of the proposed project; and d. The proposed Tree Removal Permit, together with,the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 17 trees will be replaced with new trees as part of the overall landscape theme. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission Page 954 PLANNING,COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC201 9=0021 8—.ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 3 finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared. an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in. that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public,notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and '(1i) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends.that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to. ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council:adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative. Declaration,. and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500'Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 4. Based upon .the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and.in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, Page 955 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC2019-00218 —ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF MARCH 2O21. PLANNING COMM SION OF THE Y NCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony buglielmo, -airman ATTEST: --me- 4414�—' Anne McIntosh, AICP, Se I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, OAXACA, MORALES, WILLIAMS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DOPP ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 956 RANCHOCITY OF CUCAMONGA $l Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda March 10, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on March 10, 2021. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Guglielmo at 7:12 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Sean McPherson, Sr. Planner; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2021. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 to adopt minutes as presented. D. Public Hearings D1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 (LOCATED AT 8005 CAMINO PREDERA) — RENEE MASSEY--An appeal of a Planning Director approval of a request to construct a 3,300 square foot single-family residence with two separate attached 2-car garages totaling 1,063 square feet on a vacant property of 15,601 square feet (0.36-acre) within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District located at 8005 Camino Predera —APN: 0207-631-06. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing item. With no questions from the Commission, Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing 57 Attachment 2 Commissioner Dopp requested to have the last slide brought back up on the screen and asked him to zoom in on the picture to get the perception of the what we are looking at and to recognize the different between the property to the East vs. the property being proposed today. Chuck Buquet, presented the Commissioners a presentation requested by Renee Massey, Appellant. He went over the Hillside development and highlighted and discussed grading of project site. Rob Patel, Project Applicant, responded with saying the City Planning Director already approved the project. He said their main concern was to lower the street profile and to have it consistent. He mentioned he notably reduced his street profile to be sensitive to the community's view and did a significant amount of changes. He requests the Commissioners to uphold the Planning Directors approval for his single- family residence and deny this appeal The following residents of Camino Predera supports the appeal of the project: Renee Massey, Mr. Massey, Catherine Webber; Eric Webber, Suzanne Buquet, R Element. John Adams, resident, 8045 Camino Predera, request Commissioners to see this appeal as no merit. Paul Bardos concurs with Mr. Adams. Jay Adams, resident, stated he is in support of Rob Patel's project plan. (909) 732-8009 - Sneda, support of the project site. For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted: The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: • Email received from Samiee (vacant lot owner) requesting to support the proposed development • Email received from Paul Bardos in support of the proposed development. Rob Patel, Applicant, stated in his rebuttal it's the City's responsibility to decide on the final approval and they approved the project. Chuck Buquet, Appellant, discussed in his rebuttal all they are looking for is doing what Commissioners have required of other developers that have come through is a reduced profile that can be there in the keeping of the tradition of Red Hill. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Commissioner Oaxaca stated the issues raised tonight, he can certainly understand the opinions and desires of the residents He said the existing ordinances are guidelines when it comes to establishing a certain expectation of sensitivity from a property owner to surrounding owners when it comes to views. The applicant has gone as far as reasonably possible to submit a project that meets the existing ordinances of the Hillside Development Codes. He is confident we are not setting a precedent that would be detrimental to the Redhill neighborhood and property owners along Camino Predera. Commissioner Williams stated she is glad that Planning staff has been working on developing a specific criteria to eliminate some of the questions for the next 11 to 12 houses coming down the road, we will be able to be more clear and say here is what has been decided by City Council. They would need to build within these criteria. She said the property owner brought the height down compared to the house HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES— March 10, 2021 Page 2 of 7 FINAL Page 958 on the East, looking at the picture Commissioner Dopp brought up earlier. She said we have nothing to stand on to deny this house. Commissioner Morales asked the City Attorney to confirm if it is the Planning Commission and not the Planning Director as the approving authority in this case Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; stated we adopted this standard for what triggers when a Hillside Development Review Permit has to go to the Planning Commission. He said the rule is the Planning Director is charged with making the decision on the Hillside Design Review Permit, it's only the exception that allows it to go to the Planning Commission. In this case, after reviewing the plans, City Staff determined it did not meet the threshold for going straight to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Morales asked about the cut and fill/cubic yard issue that was brought up. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, responded that the State Law has less restrictive requirements for professional preparation of plans for single family homes. Explained we would frequently look at plans when submitted and look again when something is submitted for plan check to get building permits when we have construction drawings. She said at the time the applicant actually knows they are able to proceed and they are ready to spend money on construction drawings we can double check those. Nicholas Ghirelli mentioned the City has an application checklist that lists everything that needs to go into an application for Hillside Design Review Permit before it's submitted Commissioner Morales commented there is a lot of good public comments tonight both for and against. He said the project does comply with the development code and the Planning Director is the approving authority in this case. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked in the event that what is submitted for final plan check is not consistent with what the Commission may approve tonight, what is staffs recourse at that point with the applicant Anne McIntosh responded that we either require it conform or bring it back to the Commission for amendment. Nicholas Ghirelli added the Building and Safety department would not issue a building permit for plans that do not comply with the approved plans. Commissioner Dopp asked staff regarding the tress in right of way and in front of Rob Patel's property. The disparity between staffs requirements that there be trees and landscaping of a vertical nature vs. a generic back. He said there are no trees West of the property in the Red Hill area on the south side of the street. Tabe van der Zwaag responded it is true there are no tress on the street west of applicant's house. He cannot say what happened to those trees over time. Commissioner Dopp stated the appellant has a generic point in favor of standards across the board in keeping consistency, it's important as a Commission to deliberate conditions possibly removing that aspect should be up for consideration. He said the Patel's did what they could to meet the standards and the cherished viewpoints to the people to the North. He said the codes have been met, the standards have been met and this is a reasonable project. HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES — March 10, 2021 Page 3 of 7 FINAL Page 959 Chairman Guglielmo stated the Patel's exhibited their best efforts to work with the neighbors and lowered the building height as much deemed necessary within the codes of the City. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 in favor to uphold the Planning Director's decision and deny the appeal and direct staff to prepare a draft resolution and return to the next PC meeting on March 24" for final decision on Item D1. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00533, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018- 00535, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536, & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ORC2019-00218 (LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE) — ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1.36rvacre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06 A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing Item. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated this is the first Item that has come before them where part of the application involves a General Plan Amendment and a Zoning change request that effects adjacent properties. He asked is this a situation where the adjacent properties that will be affected by the zoning change are also owned by the applicant. Tabe van der Zwaag responded no they are not owned by the applicant. Anne McIntosh mentioned the original application was different on how it was dealing with those parcels. She asked if the applicant could address that relationship when they give their presentation and explain the owners of the parcels. Commissioner Dopp asked whether or not staff feels this is the best use of land given the nature of the land and the area to put in a car wash on that specific part of land. Anne McIntosh responded we have had a number of conversations as to whether or not it's the best use of the site. She said it's a reasonable question for the Commissioners to discuss. Particularly, since we are giving a General Plan Amendment as a way to approve the project Commissioner Dopp asked about the density, planning practices regarding car washes in the area. Tabe van der Zwaag mentioned there was a moratorium put in place for car washes. He said it happened at the same time this application was submitted. The City put new regulations in for future car washes. This project skated right in underneath that moratorium and deemed complete prior to those regulations put in place. He said it did not need to comply with current standards. HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES — March 10, 2021 Page 4 of 7 FINAL Page 960 With no other questions from the Commission, Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing. Paige Gosney, Land Use Counsel for Alan Smith, stated this car wash fills the need for what the city is lacking for a particular type of car wash, it will be like no other. Available to answer questions. Nick Nazari, Owner of Car Wash on Haven/Jersey, stated he is opposed to car wash due to competition, stating too many in the city. He will fight it. Rick Gomez, Resident, in full support of project. Ryan Caufman, Resident, great idea for city and added it is environmentally friendly. Karla and Adam Elkebir, Resident, in support of car wash. Rebuttal - Paige Gosney stated competition is not a reason to deny a project. This car wash will provide something special to the community. Allan Smith, Applicant, stated he does not want to create an issue for anybody. Explained this type of car wash is an express wash. He said it's affordable when people cannot afford a full-service. Upgrading the lights/signals at Arrow and Archibald and adding a third lane to reduce congestion. For the record, it is noted that the following correspondence was received after the preparation of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted: The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: • Email received from Dan and Sheree Griffith in support of the project development. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Commissioner Dopp stated a concern for him is saturation with car washes in the area. He said maybe it is the best use of the land. As a Commission we need to start to have a conversation to do better for that part of town. He is open to deliberation and discussion but at the end of day the project and concept is good, he just wishes it was in another part of town. Commissioner Morales stated with the 17 trees being removed and replaced by 42 trees is a net positive. Expressed the design of car wash is very nice, and it is affordable and fast. He said Rancho Cucamonga residents will remain in the city rather than driving to Upland and Fontana. He believes it will bring in extra net positive car wash business, provide jobs to the community, plus this site needs to be developed. Commissioner Williams stated we do not want people leaving town to get their services. She said putting higher density on the property is a good idea. This area is a kind of a service location and it will actually improve this particular piece of town. She is in favor and does not have a problem with competition and explained there are people who want full service but there are a lot of other people who cannot afford it and do not want full service and may not have the time, so this service is for them. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated the discussions have been very interesting and the points Commissioner Dopp brought up is something to consider. He said what has been intriguing is the zoning change that is requested on the adjacent properties and it actually brings those properties into closer alignment for what we are looking to do in the city and that is to create opportunities. A transition from what we have seen in Rancho Cucamonga over the years seem to be more in line for the future of the city. He sees this as being overall positive. HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES— March 10, 2021 Page 5 of 7 FINAL Page 961 Commissioner Dopp stated he stands by his position and wishes them the best. He said he sees the positive but at the end of the day he will vote no out of sheer fact we need to have this conversation. Vice Chair Oaxaca mentioned the Conditional Use Permit and has a concern of the operating hours. He said the car wash will be up against residential uses and with vacuum stations and machines generating noise tends to create issues. Inquired if staff has any comments on those hours of operation. Commissioner Williams has the same concerns recommending shutting down at 6:00 PM or 6:30 PM rather than 9:00 PM. Nicholas Ghirelli explained whatever conditions you applied to a Conditional Use Permit need to be tied to an impact to a project. He said the MND looked at the city's code requirements for noise and the noise standards apply from hours of 7 AM to 10 PM, and obviously it will not go up to 10 PM. There is going to be some noise generated from this project and if you believe the noise is going to have an impact to the neighbors, you could adopt a reasonable condition on the hours of operation. Chairman Guglielmo re-opened the public hearing. Paige Gosney stated they understand the future of the area and multi-family to be East of the project site and they propose operating from 7:00 AM — 8:00 PM. Cameron Hilo, MIG, Environmental Consultant, explained the car wash itself will be enclosed within the car wash building. The equipment will also be within the building. In addition, there will be an 8ft cinderblock wall and over the process of the application they moved the car wash building further west away from the eastern property lines to provide further distance. In terms environmental threshold of noise, any future residents will not be impacted from the noise limit set out by the City. Commissioner Williams stated she would be okay with 8:00 PM. She asked if it comes up in the future from residents they are being impacted by the noise, can the CUP be modified. Tabe van der Zwaag mentioned the Conditions of Approval already include a condition if it breaks any of our regulations or cause any undue concerns with the neighbors, it can be brought back to the Commission. Mike Smith added if the applicant ever requested modification in their operating hours or any other characteristics of the project, they would have to approach the City first with that request for the Director's consideration and follow up review by the Planning Commission prior to any changes being implemented. Anne McIntosh mentioned the most likely scenario in the future if there is residential development being built to the East and they find it's a nuisance, that would be the time to revisit those hours. Commissioner Morales asked if the operating hours could remain at 9:00 PM and when the housing is developed and gets built and needs to be revisited, we can do at that time. He said right now we should give them every opportunity to succeed and leave it at 9:00 PM. Nicholas Ghirelli mentioned another option is to add language to the condition on the operating hours that says if residential use ever developed on the adjacent property, the operating hours should shut down at 8:00 PM. (7 AM to 8 PM) Vice Chair Oaxaca, Chairman Guglielmo and Commissioner Williams agree it would be a reasonable approach. HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES -- March 10, 2021 Page 6 of 7 FINAL Page 962 Chairman Guglielmo stated he is in support of modifying operating hours 7 AM to 8 PM. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 4-1-0 (opposed Dopp) modify CUP operating hours 7 AM —8 PM. Adding a sentence to Planning Condition#3 stating the operating hours will become 7 AM — 8 PM. E. General Business Ell. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Denying a Conditional Use Permit for Alcoholic Beverage Sales Under DRC2020-00087 and Recommending that the City Council Deny a Request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459. Sean McPherson, Sr. Planner presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and mentioned after staff presentation at the PC meeting of February 2411, Commission voted unanimously to deny the CUP relative to the off sales alcohol beverage sales as well as recommend the City Council deny the PCN. Commission directed staff and applicant to work together on the balance of the development application. As an update, the project is on-going with the applicant and staff still intends to return to the Commission at a later date. Grant Ross, Owner and Applicant, mentioned they removed the beer and wine from the project. They are eager to bring project back at a future hearing. Commissioner Dopp encourages Mr. Ross and 7111 to devote as much space as possible to options that are not junk food, caffeine, typical convenient store items that are usually at their stores. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 to continue with resolution. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Workshop - None I. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5-0. Meeting was adjourned at 10:49pm. Respectfully submitted, r li beth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: HPCIPC Meeting on March 24, 2021. HPCIPC Meeting MINUTES— March 10, 2021 Page 7 of 7 FINAL Page 963 DRC2O18-00535 — Arbor Carwash Timeline Original Application Submittal — June 18, 2018 Application Resubmittals — October 11, 2018 December 18, 2018 February 26, 2019 Incompleteness Determinations — July 18, 2018 November 08, 2018 January 17, 2019 Completeness Determination — May 8, 2019 Neighborhood Meeting —April 29, 2019 Design Review Committee - December 17, 2019 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Hired —January 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments — February 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted — March 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments Round 2 - April 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted — End of April 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments Round 3 — May 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted — June 2020 CEQA Peer Review Accepted as Complete July 2020 Planning Commission Hearing Continuance August 12, 2020 (Applicant Requested to Change Project Scope) September 2020 — Meetings with applicant's legal representative to discuss GPA October-November 2020 — (info gathered from email sent by applicant to staff on 11/10/20) applicant attempting to work with school district to obtain a letter memorializing their support of the proposed rezone of the property at 9782 Arrow Route to MH) December 2020 - CEQA Consultant Revises IS/MND to reflect revised GPA Planning Commission — March 10, 2021 Scheduled for City Council Review— June 2, 2021 Attachment 3 Page 964 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00533, AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00534 — A REQUEST TO 1) AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR ONE 0.85 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 1.21 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AND 2) AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FOR ONE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND FORTWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; - APNS: 0208-291-01 —02 AND -03. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018- 00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00534 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the application." The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are part of a larger application for entitlements to permit a car wash on the site identified as APN: 0209-291-06 and 0208-291-03. In addition, the applications are needed to address the State's no-net loss provisions effectively precludes the City from reducing the residential density of sites within the City unless it offsets that loss on other sites. 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended City Council approval of said application on that date. 3. On June 2, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing MeetiRg to August 4, 2021. 4. On August 4, 2021 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reopened wed the duly noticed public hearing on the application 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of theCity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Page 965 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings on June 2, 2021 and August 4, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06-acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land currently have a General Plan Land Use designation of Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Site Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District South Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residence' Residential District West Service Stationz General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 —"Beverly Hills House" (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 — Non-operational but approved for reactivation C. This General Plan Amendment (DRC2018-00533) will change the General Plan Land Use designation for three parcels of land. Parcel 0208-291-01 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial, and Parcels 0208-291-01 and -02 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential; and d. This Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00534) will change the zoning designation of one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and of two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment would facilitate the development of a proposed car wash. The City Council dings that the addition of a new car wash at this location is unnecessary due to an overconcentration of car washes in the vicinity. The project is located within Southwest Rancho Cucamonga, an area of the City the majority of which has been identified by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as being a disadvantaged community. Staff notes that while there are approximately 15 car washes throughout the City, the proposed project would constitute the fourth car wash within Southwest Rancho Cucamonga alone. The City Council believes that an over concentration of car washes in such a small area, especially an area which has been identified as a disadvantaged community, could cause potential impacts, such as noise impacts due to Page 966 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 3 industrial vacuuming systems, increased air pollution and traffic congestion as the use is a vehicle-oriented service which might induce additional traffic to the area. Thus, the City Council finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are inconsistent with the City's objectives of promoting successful land use development. Specifically, and considering the proliferation of car washes within Southwest Rancho Cucamonga, the City Council finds that the project fails to meet the intent of Genera Plan Land Use Goal LU-6 which requires that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." The City Council finds that considering the number of car washes currently in operation in Southwest Rancho Cucamonga, approving a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to permit a fourth car wash does not meet any compelling community need. b. The City Council has long been concerned about the adverse impacts of car washes on the community. To that end, it adopted a moratorium on car wash uses so that the City could analyze those impacts, particularly those located near residential uses. Given the City Council's concerns about car washes, it does not believe that amending the General Plan and Zoning Map to permit a car wash next to higher density residential development is in the best interest of its residents. C. The future land use vision for Arrow and Archibald neighborhood as proposed inthe draft PlanRC Land Plan does not include auto-related uses. The subject property will no longer be designated as LM Residential but is not proposed to accommodate a car wash use in the future designation either. d. Car was uses are not compatible with residential neighborhoods. The General Plan and Zoning Map Amendment would intensity these two incompatible uses by increasing density and allowing even more residential dwelling units to be in close proximity to the car wash. There are many other locations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga where a car wash could be located at a much further distance from neighboring residences and creating none of these incompatibilities. e. Considering the totality of the findings list above, the City Council finds that the General Plan Amendment is not in the public interest. There is no substantial public benefit to be derived from such an amendment and the proposed amendment does not further the goals of the General Plan. Further, the City Council also finds that the Zoning Map Amendment would not be consistent with the General Plan's goals, policies and implementation programs. This is because the City Council is not approving the proposed General Plan Amendment. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project which the City disapproves. 5. Based on all of the evidence in the record and the above findings, the City Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. Page 967 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 4 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, Alan Smith, at the address identified in City records. Page 968 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS August 4, 2021 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 41h DAY OF AUGUST 2021. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 969 SOUTHWEST V1 07 � Tc GROUP ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENTAND BENEFITS We are proud to submit our Tuscan themed, environmentally-clean Express Car Wash, providing a much-needed service and aesthetic improvement to the surrounding area, complimenting the Vineyard tradition and quality development of Rancho Cucamonga. As our population increases, no longer will Rancho Cucamonga residents have to leave our City for quality service. Arbor Express Car Wash will be the first Express Car Wash in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After 3 years working with the City, we are happy to present the first of its kind Express Car Wash in our beautiful City. Our Project is fully Code-Compliant, including SB330 (Residential Density Offset), with the help of the Planning Director, which we appreciate. This information is reflected in our approved CEQA Report which confirms this Project is the appropriate Land Use for our site. On March 10, 2021, our Project received a majority Planning Commission Approval with Conditions we have reviewed and accept. Please see the attached Staff recommendations to the Planning Commission for our Project to be Approved and forwarded to you, the City Council, for Approval. Our Master-Planned Project offers environmentally-clean and affordable car wash services to our community. It will provide additional employment to our neighborhood, as well as ongoing support for local fundraising groups and organizations. We are grateful and want to thank the City Planning Director and her staff for their help and support, as well as their recommendation for Approval, and appreciate your consideration for Approval. Respectfully, Pete Dejager Alan E. Smith Attachment 5 12223 HIGHLANDAVE, SUITE # 106-201 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739.909g2314 603 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �y DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00533,ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536, $TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019.00218 -ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1,36-acre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action. • Approve Design Review DRC2018-00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. • Recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The project scope is for the site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center. Project approval is contingent on the approval of related General Plan/Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation of one of two parcels that makes up the project site from a residential land use/zoning designation (Low Medium (LM)) to a commercial land use/zoning designation (General Commercial(GC)). Based on the State of California's"no- net-loss" requirement. the loss of potential residential development on the one project Page 971 z x. rrp wEST F.LEvATi0N SOUTH ELEVATION �r[ior 3 Sry*114Yy 913Am GnGxm W-�Ayeclsi:LYdJN O]tY ArEn I:u�ae��[MgeiCmcw��L9-0kC LN Asa ARCHIBALD AVE. I 1 k _ � k: 57 a �4! Y r s ARBOR EXPRESS [} oFs1( CAR WASH SCHEMATIC G A f`C I A MO�14TFS "-, OT44 ARROW RDLITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1 RAMCkOCOCAMOHGA.CA925T1 LANDSCAPE City is recognized for sustainability plan From Stgff rgportP open space, transporta- tion and mobility,green The City of Rancho building and waste re- Cucamonga recently re- duction. ceived the "Green Re- The city began devel- gion" Award from the oping the plan in August Southern California As- 2013 using a $160,000 sociation of Governments grant from SCAG. It was for its community-based adopted in April 2017. Sustainable Community Crucial to the com- Action Plan_ pletion of the plan was SCAG, the country's an extensive public out- largest metropolitan reach campaign, which planning organization, resulted in the participa- announced the win- tion of thousands of res- a ners of its Sustainabil- idents, local businesses, ity Awards Program at community organiza- its 2018 Regional Con- tions, students, city staff ference and General As- and elected officials. a sembly Thursday,May 3, The eity's sustainabil- in Indian Wells. ity efforts are part of its The plan serves as a larger Healthy RC initia- road map.for advancing tive established by the environmental sustain- City Council in 2008. ability in Rancho Cu- For more informa- camonga, according to tion and to view the Sus- a news release from the tainable Community Ac- city. tion Plan visit https:// Key areas of the plan www.cityofrc.us/web- include energy and water sites/healthyre/chp/en- efficiency, land use and viro.asp. Page 974 G- FORCE 0■ • reputation for To: Rancho Cucamonga City Council re: Arbor Express Car Wash We are proud to be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and we are excited about new developments which improve life in the neighborhoods here. The population growth over the years was met with remarkable and responsible development in our City. Expansion of Housing also creates the need for services desired by the new residents. Ideally we'd like those services to be nearby so consumers needn't travel outside the City. The Arbor Express Car Wash provides just such services for all citizens in our community. The northeast corner of Archibald and Arrow has been a blight in the community for many years. The prospect of having attention paid to these parcels, AND having new services available to nearby residents is a win-win in our opinion. We have reviewed the plans & drawings and we couldn't be more pleased with the quality inherent in the design, as well as the attention to environmentally- responsible detail in the project. We have seen other of their projects and they certainly reflect the first-class amenities our City is known for. We can only hope that you'll be able to attract a buyer for the adjacent parcel to the west who will mirror such effort. In our opinion, the Arbor Express Car Wash warrants your positive review and endorsement. How soon can it move forward? Thanks again for your consideration. Dan & Cheree Griffith Page 975 REALTY ".WORLD ALL STARS REALTY WORLD ALL STARS 10807 laurel St.#tra'RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAUFORAIIA 91730 (909)942-3003- (9")583.4852 fan wuvw,rwA1 7AR me www.RealtyWnrldAUSUrsA*m a RWAl1stan@grm9.come OLD 0-"-SNutmber-,96,ne-9 i May 24, 2021 To. Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH Dear Cite Council. 'thank you for the opportunitti to submit this letter in Support of the proposed ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH for%our consideration and Appro%al I am in support of population grov%th and business dci elopment.ho%%e.er. there are not enough businesses in the Service sector in Rancho Cucamonga to beep nit«ith the gro-,%th Arbor Express Car Wash provides a ialuable Service to all citizens ofour Comrnumt,<. It will help to keep our cltiiens from hat ing to drive to. and spend mone._ at other cities to trash their cars.or wait in long lines at existing Car a ashes. It prov ides an env ironmen tal K-responsible alternative by rec.cling its water. and utilizing solar power at a cost to the consumer loNt enough to encourage Its use. And. it%-,ill upgrade the aesthetics to an area that is in much-need ofimpro.ements The Arbor Express Car Wash warrants tour positive review and endorsement. and I urge the CaN Council to approve this project Thank for your consideration. incerel%. PresidenVCo-Owner DRE#01102161 Realty Worltl ALL STARS 10807 Laurel St, Suite 110 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (D)NS-942-3003 k Page 976 REALTY WORLD ALL STARS 10807 laurel Sireet#11Q Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 909.921.2310 1 otn4 .. I Dre Lic&01526169 May 20, 2021 RE: Arbor Express Car Wash Dear City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, As Rancho Cucamonga continues to add to its,population density, the consequential impact on our precious natural resources cannot be overlooked. The Arbor Express Car Wash will provide an environmentally responsible alternative to current wasteful habits by recycling water and utilizing solar power at a cost to the consumer low enough to encourage its use. We need solutions to-our housing crisis and yet, adding more housing and-occupants can only be accomplished responsibly by minimizing drain on our limited resources. Projects like this express car wash, that incorporate technology to recirculate water and offset its impact on our power grid, is the responsible way to grow our city. It will also improve the surrounding aesthetics. I urge you to approve this project. Sincerely, Joe homas, broker Realty World All Stars Rancho Cucamonga homeowner since 1979 Page 977 Bruce Engles sREALTY ;lWORLD Al I.STABS 10807 Laurel St_ Suite 110 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 BRE Lic# 01330880 May 26, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga , CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga City Council: The main issue 1 want to emphasize before the City Council would be, that with the population growth and business development in our City, one of the consequential outcomes is there are not enough Service businesses to keep up with those demands, and that Arbor Express Car Wash provides a valuable Service to all citizens of our Community. No longer will our citizens need to drive out of, and spend their money in, other cities just to wash their cars. It is environmentally-responsible (recycling its water & solar power), and the aesthetics upgrade a corner area that is in much-need of improvement. I strongly recommend that the City Council approve this project. Thank you. Bruce Engles Bruce Engles Realtor Page 978 2021-08-04 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED FOR ITEM G2 G R E S H A M I SAVAGE Paige.Gosney@GreshamSavage.com • San Bernardino Office r i-t Y 3 A 1 (909)890-4499 • fax(909)890-9877 July 30,2021 VIA E-MAIL-city.clerk@cityofrc.us AND U.S. MAIL Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: City Council Agenda Item G.2: Arbor Express Auto Wash (Consideration of General Plan Amendment (DRC2018-00533) and Zoning Map Amendment(DRC2018-00534)) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This firm represents Arbor Express Auto Wash ("Arbor Express") in connection with the above-referenced auto wash project located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") (the "Project"). The Project, including design review, a conditional use permit, tree removal permit, and proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments, were considered and approved by the City Planning Commission on March 10, 2021, by a vote of 4-1 pursuant to a Staff recommendation of approval. The Planning Commission expressly agreed with Staff and recommended approval of the General Plan and Zoning Map amendments that are scheduled to be considered by the City Council as Agenda Item No. G2 at the upcoming August 4,2021, meeting. The purpose of this letter is to formally request a further continuance of the City Council hearing on the Project due to some recent and unexpected changes to the Project Applicant team and availability to attend the August 4 meeting. In short, Alan Smith, the lead Project Applicant was recently asked to step away and so will no longer be involved with the Project. Pete DeJager will be the Project Applicant moving forward. SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 • San Bernardino, California 92408 /fffv TD�� SAN DIEGO 401 West A Street, Suite 925 • San Diego, California 92101 �J GreshamSavage.com D617-002--4132050.1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga July 30, 2021 Page 2 Mr. DeJager,however,has been only tangentially involved in the planning, design and entitlement of the Project and so Mr. Smith's sudden removal has left the Project in a bit of a disarray as he was intending to present the Project to the City Council at the August 4 hearing. In addition, Mr. DeJager has had an unexpected family matter arise and so will not be available to attend the August 4 hearing and give the Project presentation on behalf of Arbor Express. In light of these developments, we are requesting that the City Council agree to a further continuance of the Project to the meeting scheduled for November 3, 2021. Based upon our discussions with City Staff, the City Council meeting dates in September and October are not feasible to accommodate the Project hearing on top of other previously-planned items. A further brief continuance of the hearing on the Project is both necessary and justified, as Arbor Express has invested countless thousands of dollars over the course of more than three (3) years in support of this Project and successfully obtained 4-1 Planning Commission approval of the Project's entitlements, including recommendations of approval of the General Plan and Zoning Map amendments. We appreciate the City Council's consideration and anticipated approval of this reasonable request for a brief continuance of the public hearing on the Project to November 3, 2021. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, Paige H. G ey, of GRESHAM AVAGE NOLAN &TILDEN, A Professional Corporation PHG/tdg cc: City Manager,John Gillison* City Attorney,James L. Markman* City Planning Director,Anne McIntosh* (*via e-mail only) D617-002--4132050.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Analysis of the Current State of Parking for the Area of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: At the March 17, 2020 meeting of the City Council, Councilmember Scott requested a follow-up item be brought to the Council regarding parking concerns related to the area west of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. This area currently hosts Vince's Spaghetti, a very popular family restaurant, and an undeveloped triangular parcel directly to the east, proposed for development of a new restaurant and 2nd story office building. Due to the popularity of Vince's Spaghetti, Council requested staff to complete an analysis of these concerns and provide an update related to findings. ANALYSIS: Parking for Vince's Spaghetti is available onsite within an asphalt paved parking lot where 56 regular parking stalls and 2 handicap accessible stalls have been made available. In addition to the restaurant site parking lot, on-street parking is also available along portions of San Bernardino Road as shown on the attached vicinity map. On-street parking is prohibited along the Foothill Boulevard. As Councilmember Scott noted in her comments at the March 17th Council Meeting, the parking lot for Vince's Spaghetti is often observed to operate at or near its capacity, sometimes resulting in vehicles parked on the unimproved area east of the existing parking lot. A parking study was conducted to analyze parking in the area during a typical Friday and Saturday. The graph provided as Attachment 2 shows that peak times fall between approximately 5:30pm and 8:30pm on a Friday, and that during this time the existing parking lot experiences at most 91% utilization represented by the blue line (51 spaces out of the 56 are occupied, leaving 5 vacant)with 16 vehicles parked within the unimproved area (orange bar) and 2 vehicles parked on the street (grey bar). A similar peak in parking demand can be observed for Saturday between 5:OOpm and 9:OOpm, when the parking lot experiences the same maximum utilization of 91%, but with 13 vehicles parked within the unimproved area and 5 vehicles parked on the street. While no immediate action is recommended at this time, staff will continue to monitor the potential Page 979 for future development on the undeveloped parcel. Should the development move forward into plancheck and progress toward building permits, staff will develop a program to address additional parking on the street and bring an item back to the City Council for consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City to build upon our success as a world class community by proactively addressing any potential future impacts related to parking, ensuring equitable development. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Graphical Analysis Page 2 Page 980 VICINITY MAP a Elemen ' 'fella Vist:y � s tary I school m Red Hill n - tauntry Club camirt❑Sur I Anil.,St . J ® I F ash 111$Ivcr Sc$4 1 14 1 dwo ate& • Cava Or I a > Vince's Spaghetti is IBM Undeveloped Parcel ATTACHMENT 1 Page 981 GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS Parking Utilization - Friday 5/21 100% 91% 55 89% 90% 89% 84% 50 86% 79% 80% 45 70% 40 64% 60% 57% 35 Y v g 30 V) N° ¢ 50% 0 �On Street to 41% 25 0 �Dirt Lot 40% 38% 38% -%Utilized 20 3 29% 30% 25% 25% 2 3 • 15 20% 160 2 10 16% 10% 7% 14% 9% 5 2% 4% 0% OOK A 6 a a a a 6 a a a a a � � 0 O° o° o° O° o° o° o° o° O° .O° o° o° o° o° O° o° o° o° o° .o° o° O° .. �. �. (6. A. 4i oi' yO yti' yti' y"i yo yh yro y�' y4i yoi ti0 Ly ti1 Lei Time ATTACHMENT 2 Page 982 GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS Parking Utilization - Saturday 5/22 100% 55 91% 91% 90% 0 88% 86/ 50 88% 82% 80% 86% 79% 45 70% 40 35 60% v v o 30 c Y Q 50% O On Street 0 to J 41% 25 �Dirt Lot 40% 38% %Utilized 34% 20 30% 15 20% 16% 10 14% 10% 5 4%- 2 0% 2% 2% 2°� � 1 S 1 0 0 :P :P 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 00 00 0. ti. 1• �. 0• �. �. �• o• y0• yti. ,y* y.11 yN. y51 yro* y1. y�. ,y* If" ,L'y -D1, 1L1 . Time Page 983 Analysis of Parking for The Area of Foothill Blvd and San Bernardino Rd City Council Meeting 08/04/21 BACKGROUND ' r US- Magic Lamp Inn : lop oot Vince's Spaghvw etti r a 3 1 56 0 P i I stalls 01' ' BernardinoT • -- *' • - .. --- LIM= Undeveloped Parcel ANALYSIS Parking Utilization - Friday 5/21 100% 91% 55 89% 90% 89% 84% 50 86/ 80% ° 79°° 45 70% 40 64% 60% 57% 35 + v o 30 �' c N .; 50% O > �On Street 41% 25 0 L �Dirt Lot 40% 38% 38% 0 Utilized 20 3 29% 30% 25% 25 2 3 15 4 20% 160 --. 10 16% 10% 7% 14% 9% 5 2% 4% 0% 71 S S S 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 00 0° o° o o° o0 0° o° o° o0 0° oo .00 o° o° KIP o° 61 61 ° o° oo .00 o° o0 v ti 3 0 �' w do titi titi 4do ti� ti� tip' ti� ti� yo yv titi 4 Time ANALYSIS Parking Utilization - Saturday 5/22 100% 55 91% 91% 90/° 86% --- -- ---- 88%-- 50 88% 82% 80% ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------86%- -- 79% 45 70% ----- -------------- - 40 35 60% --------------------------------------------------------------- o 30 'Fu 50% ---- ---------------- O > o �On Street Ln 41% 25 �Dirt Lot ° ------------------40/ 38% %Utilized 34% 20 30% ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- 15 20% ------------------------- 16% 10 14% 10% 1 5 4% 2 2% 2% 2% 0% o o0 0° o° .o0 0° o0 00 .00 .00 .00 00 00 0° o0 00 00 0° .00 00 .00 ti• ti• 3• o�• �• �• �• w• �;• tio• titi• titi• ti3• tio�• tih• tip• �• tiw• tip• ,yo• titi• titi• ti3• Time PARKING IN THE FUTURE Magic Lamp Inn oth�//e/ % Vince's Spaghetti 56 0 pi stalls ' BernardinoT' • -- *' • - .. ,�. • Undeveloped Parcel QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 1 f r r r j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer Chris Ellis, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 086) (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution to establish the "De Anza, et al." residential permit parking district on De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court. BACKGROUND: Located west of Coyote Canyon Elementary School, between the West Greenway Park Community Trail and Elm Avenue, Tract 14803 began development in 1996. The tract of 43 single family homes is circulated by residential collector streets internally, which intersects with Elm Avenue providing access to the City's street network. In 2001, Tract 16001 began development on the south side of Elm Ave between Church Street and Spruce Ave, eventually being given the name Jamboree Apartments. Along the south side of De Anza Drive, parking is restricted during the nighttime hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM between Elm Avenue and Emery Place. No other restrictions for on street parking are currently in place for the remaining portions of De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court. Municipal Code section 10.50.020 allows for the formation of a permit parking district if: A. Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district. B. The interference by such vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals. C. That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district. Page 984 D. That 75% of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by City Council action in absence of a petition). E. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas. F. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is practical. ANALYSIS: Staff was contacted earlier this year by residents from the neighborhood expressing concerns of nuisance activity as well as vehicles parked in violation of the 72-hour limit per the City's ordinance. This pattern of illegal parking had been accompanied by trash being left in the street. In response, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department had been called upon to issue citations and remove illegally parked vehicles along the streets within the proposed permit parking district. As reported by residents,vehicles causing these concerns originate from outside of the immediate neighborhood and have led to a lack of available on street parking for residents and guests, blocking of driveways and mailboxes, and concern for public safety. Following the process as outlined in Municipal Code section 10.50, a representative of the neighborhood has provided a petition showing support from 40 of the 43 addresses in the neighborhood, or 93% of the residents, for the creation of a permit parking district along De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court. The representative was not able to reach or gain support from 3 of the addresses. Chapter 10.50.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that the City Council make the following findings prior to adoption of a resolution creating a residential permit parking district: A. Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district; Vehicles parked within the proposed residential permit parking district are observed to originate from outside of the neighborhood and have regularly interfered with the use of on street parking by residents and their guests. Many of the vehicles are observed to be owned by residents outside of the immediate neighborhood. B. The interference by such vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; The interference of on street parking is occurring significantly and daily. C. That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district; Vehicles from outside the community have created impacts including a reduction of parking available for residents, litter, and concerns for public safety leading to potential Page 2 Page 985 devaluation of real property. D. That 75% of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by City Council action in absence of a petition); A petition requesting the creation of the residential permit parking district is supported by 40 out of 43 addresses in the neighborhood, which is 93% of the residents within the proposed district. A copy of the petition is on file in the office of the City Engineer. E. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas; The proposed residential permit parking district contains the last of the on-street parking available in the area located along the frontage of single-family residential units. Surrounded by apartments and condominiums within walkable distance, the potentially displaced vehicles likely belong to residents of these residential developments. The creation of the proposed permit parking district would encourage these nearby residential developments to resolve this demand for parking on site and limit the impacts to the community. It should be noted that existing on street parking remains available along Elm Avenue. F. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is practical. Staff worked with members of the community to explore other options for parking restrictions, such as time specific restriction of parking, complete restriction of parking, different boundaries for the proposed permit parking district, etc. but these options did not satisfy the needs of the neighborhood. Continued enforcement of the violations occurring on the streets within the proposed permit parking district have also proved to be costly and ineffective in discouraging further violations. It is determined that the requested residential permit parking district is the most appropriate and practical solution to address these impacts. Residential permit parking districts have been created and proven to be effective in other areas of the city. The proposed permit parking district is anticipated to alleviate these impacts to the neighborhood and protect the community's quality of life. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this action would be minor, consisting of the cost of parking passes, installation of signs, and the associated administration of the permit parking program for an additional 43 residences. The City already has several permit parking districts, and this district would adopt the same policies and procedures. COUNCIL MISSION I VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Creation of the proposed permit parking district addresses the City Council's vision for the City by establishing programs that maintain the high quality of life in local neighborhoods that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Resolution for City Council Page 3 Page 986 De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive and Danner Court Residential Permit Parking District Vicinity Map Not to Scale l Y � [ col lag*School i Base Line Rcl K_ 13—yan st genvl rk Dr m Leman Ave �1Q�9a nr Vl nty�� Or a Muirp�ef¢ar a � Vl—ria st Grapeland Y w aEtl _ w Rr �46�,Jte Terra Vista Pkwy w/ >- o �P I pkNN +s Coyote Carryon aCf Park Rancho o IN Cucamonga I—vv Ft? w W 1=; A Jegr I u��in Vier•. °j�^- North Terse/Blvd Whltt"I Av Cohie(_:: � Cucamonga y P,. -NMS, Proposed "De Anza hfoUnidin Yiew�•' rr c b 6th5t - I N Dr. Permit Parking District VHeyhridge Pf { Canno-n br Spruce avenue Park WestGreenway 4 Park LJ /= Huxley ll ` c C ote Canyon fi Flamell �r School apenesc Jamboree Apartments ,L cruse C7 ° Ralph M.Levris Park ChuK£h St AN ATTACHMENT 1 Page 987 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-#### A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING THE "DE ANZA DRIVE, ET AL." PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals 1. California Vehicle Code Section 22507 allows a general law city to establish by resolution a preferential parking program by which there is a designation of certain streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents adjacent to the streets for their use and the use of their guests. 2. Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code permits the establishment of a Permit Parking District in an area in which vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are outside of the proposed Permit Parking District substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use by residents. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a map of an area herein referred to as "De Anza Dr, et al." and also hereinafter referred to as the "Parking District" in which vehicles operated by persons whose destination is outside of the boundaries of the proposed district, substantially and regularly interfering with the use and availability of parking spaces in the Parking District. 4. Substantial evidence has been presented to this Council demonstrating that the persons referred to in Recital 3 above, not only occupy a majority of the parking spaces in the Parking District, but also block access to the Parking District's residences, disrupt delivery of mail and packages, and deposit trash and litter within the Parking District, and that these activities occur at regular and significant intervals. 5. It is the purpose of this Resolution to establish the Parking District as an area within which parking shall be limited at all times to parking by residents of that Parking District, their guests, and those persons exempt from that limitation pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100. 6. Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.040, the residents of the proposed Permit Parking District's petition shall be submitted before the City Council with the City Engineer's Recommendation and Report which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been satisfied. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ATTACHMENT 2 Page 988 1. This Council hereby finds that all the facts stated in Part A of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this City Council including the evidence contained in the staff report, the City Council further finds and determines as follows: A. Vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are outside of the Parking District as defined in Subsection 10.50.020(A) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of parking spaces for use of residents within the Parking District; B. The interference by the vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above occurs at regular and significant intervals; C. The vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above cause and are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, and environmental pollution within the Parking District; D. A petition of the Residents of the proposed Permit Parking District has been received by the City Engineer and said petition was confirmed to have more than 75% of the Residents agree to the establishment of the Permit Parking District. E. No unreasonable displacement of vehicles operated by persons whose destination is outside of the Parking District will result into surrounding residential areas; and F. No alternative solution, other than the establishment of the Permit Parking District is feasible or practical. 3. Based on the findings set forth in Paragraph 2 above, the Parking District is hereby established as a Permit Parking District pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and parking therein is restricted to those residents and their guests possessing permits issued by the City Engineer or his designee and those exempt pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100. 4. The City Engineer's Recommendation and Report has been submitted and the City Council accepts and approves said Recommendation and Report inclusive of Cost of Parking Permits. 5. The City Engineer is hereby instructed to immediately cause appropriate signs to be placed and posted within the Parking District indicating the parking limitations established by this Resolution and to implement and administer the permit process specified in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 10.50.070 and 10.50.080. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2021-###-Page 2 of 5 Page 989 EXHIBIT A "De Anza Dr et al." Permit Parking District The proposed district includes the houses fronting De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court and shall restrict parking on both sides of these streets north of Elm Avenue to vehicles with valid permits or exemptions as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. MIN EM ME IUD M, VEX 97W ELM] E wluff E vao Mal zo 9M EM MM m<; N PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY VIOLATORS WILL BE TOWED Resolution No. 2021-###-Page 3 of 5 Page 990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91 730 1 909.477,2700 1 www.CityofRC.u3 EXHIBIT B Engineer's Recommendations PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT PROGRAM The Parking Permit District Program is governed by Section 10.50, "Permit Parking Districts" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and allows residents of a Permit Parking District special permits that exempt them and their guests from certain on-street parking restrictions. REQUESTING A PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Requests for creation of a Permit Parking District may be made by submitting a petition signed by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the residents (one vote per address)within the boundaries of the proposed district (as designated in the petition) to the Engineering Services Department. All requests will be reviewed for conformance with program requirements defined in Section 10.50, "Permit Parking Districts" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code including the following required findings: • Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district; • The interference by commuter vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; • That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district; • That 75 percent of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition); • That no unreasonable displacement of commuter vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas; • That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is feasible or practical. Upon completion of this review, City staff will inform applicants of their findings. Requests that meet program requirements will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The City Council may establish the requested Permit Parking District by adoption of a resolution. LIMITATIONS A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.44.130, "Storage of Vehicles upon Streets", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.44.130, a vehicle may not park in the same parking space on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours. As well, parking permits do not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.64.030 "Parking Restriction", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.64.030, it is unlawful for any person to park or store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat upon any public street or highway or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM on any day. Residential Parking Permit Program Page 1 Updated: 7/26/2021 Resolution No. 2021-###-Page 4 of 5 Page 991 TYPES OF PERMITS AND PROPER DISPLAY The City currently issues a mirror-hanger style permit which shall be hung from the inside rear view mirror, visible from the front of the vehicle. Temporary guest parking permits are to be placed on the dashboard with the printed side visible from the front of the vehicle. OBTAINING PARKING PERMITS Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for parking permits. Proof of residency less than 30 days old is required upon application for permits. A maximum of five (5) parking permits may be issued to residents of a single dwelling unit. Requests for more than five (5) parking permits per address are subject to review by the City Engineer. Parking permits may be obtained in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 or by mailing a copy of your information to the Engineering Services Department at the address listed below. Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms (originals will be reviewed for proof of residency and returned to the requestor): • Current utility bill, bank statement, credit card bill, or other bill statement that was sent through the mail on a monthly billing cycle • Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days • Proof of property ownership, tax bill or new escrow papers EXPIRATION Parking permits are valid for a period of up to five (5) years. Parking permits currently being issued will expire on July 31, 2025. COSTS • Parking Permit $10 for the first vehicle plus $2 for each additional vehicle (maximum of 5) when registered all at the same time. • Replacement of lost, stolen, or damaged permits $10 each • Temporary Guest Parking Permit Free The cost listed for parking permits is based on the cost of materials and staff time to manage the program and for keeping records. Costs are subject to change. TEMPORARY GUEST PARKING PERMITS Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for Temporary Guest Parking Permits which are valid for one day. If a resident desire more than fifty (50) Temporary Guest Parking Permits for a special event, the resident may apply for a special event permit that will temporarily suspend the need for visitors to display a parking permit. Staff may require that the resident fulfill special conditions, such as notifying neighbors of the special event, and covering the permit parking district regulation signs. FINE FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS • Fine per violation $50 (Fines are subject to change) PROGRAM CONTACT INFORMATION City of Rancho Cucamonga / Engineering Services Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700 Residential Parking Permit Program Page 2 Updated: 7/26/2021 Resolution No. 2021-###-Page 5 of 5 Page 992 City Council Presentation De Anza Drive et al .11 Permit Parking District Lo„ege , Banyan Sid Lemon Ave pc T762 v n� ' � _ 7803 9e 'ypn a' 7a02 ~' 7808 7 �' lei A103'� 11041051 7B21 7814 TS01 { 1103 10 11009 11021 TB27 7 7B20 7807 4 j ' . . 7813 11003 7838 7826 If 11G3 103 10421104 7832 - T J � 41018 T825 ♦ is < I1161205$ 1070 a 7831 'f ♦ Rancho 9 ♦ Cucamonga ♦ ; 1 -- w A"",RIP* � 7853 -, North ♦ ♦ ♦ vran.,,'nv +r 7$49 Cucamonga ♦ 7B55 — ♦ ♦ 7061 AN Existing Condition • Regular/Frequent Occurrences of: • Trash/Environmental Pollution • Unreasonable Noise • Interference of Parking (e.g. double-parked, abandoned vehicles, Etc.) .e►fi_ �� �. :1�T 1���r'. •\t"'♦ '.�y�K w'1 .h�• •� r .f,Y ���'� '" W t;-. ; �y �-. y l tt T r R-• `~.--.1!��.rr,�'71►a.I�f'. � :� `+i`A4 ..� a c�Nrc'`'�'71fa -'' .15, 1���4 +�^- � n PIP `r f � - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r - �_" xR`;�� .�.� .;� � — a ,� a. qn •�, �� fit Ar- eq � ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r A � n 4� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Process of establishing a Parking District • Resident(s) in neighborhood contact the city and request to establish parking District. • Staff reviews the request to ensure conformance with the program requirements defined in Section 10.50, "Permit Parking Districts" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. • Staff designates the boundary of the proposed parking district. • A designated resident leads the effort in collecting signatures from residents (one vote per address) within the proposed district. Municipal Code Section 10 . 50 . 020 Designation of permit parking districts A. Drivers who don't live in the neighborhood are regularly occupying on-street parking in the neighborhood. B. Traffic hazards, environmental pollution, or devaluation of real property. C. Support from 75% of the residents within the proposed district (a signed petition) D. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas E. No practical alternative solutions A Proposed Parking District �:Yi'Y:Ti1F1�4G Existing Restricted Jamboree Parking Apartments rr�cr --- 776 7803 7802 • • Tao1 11021 782a 7aO7 003 •7a33 • • 1101 11068 • 1070 � • • Support (40) • ---� • No Signature (3) *, 78 AN No Parking lOpm ...... ....... TV Irk., PO 'rW C3Lw --Now 410b MOW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ProposedSignage Replace existing sign Install new sign and post • Install new sign on existing light standard 7759 � 7803 7802 1 7809 7so-e � 7813 ~ 7aa1 P RR I N i021 1103"11030104}10 7821 7814 �� 11009 7827 7820 7847 � 11003 7826 7813 PERMIT , 9903103E11042110 7833 783E 4fi418 7825 O N LY ti 11012 _ 058 RS � 1070 78 VIO+ ■ �y31 " WILL BE 7843 TOWED 784E 78E6 7R61 - AN Fiscal Impact • Fiscal impact would be minor. • Associated costs : • Parking passes • Installation of signs • Associated administration • The City already has other Permit Parking Districts in place. Council Goal ( s ) Addressed • Creation of the proposed permit parking district addresses the Council's vision to establish programs that: • Maintain high quality of life in local neighborhoods • Promote aworld-class community CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 4, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Joanna Marrufo, Management Aide SUBJECT: Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Business Meeting. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council designate Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy as voting Delegate and Council Member Scott as Alternate for the Annual Business Meeting of the 2021 League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Conference. BACKGROUND: The League's 2021 Annual Conference is scheduled to take place on September 22-24, 2021, in Sacramento. An essential part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting during the General Assembly on Friday, September 24. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on various resolutions that establish League policy on municipal issues of statewide importance. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate one (1) voting delegate and appoint up to two (2) alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. According to the League bylaws, the voting delegate and the two alternate delegates must be designated by an official vote of the City Council. ANALYSIS: The designated voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. Only one (1) voting card will be provided for use by either the voting delegate or the alternates. The task of voting at the Annual Business Meeting cannot be transferred to any other city official beyond the designated voting delegate and alternates. The voting delegate and alternates can be Council Members or City Staff scheduled to participate in the conference. Mayor Michael, a past-President of Cal Cities, will be unavailable for much of the conference and therefore isn't appropriate as a delegate. Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy and Council Member Scott both serve on Cal Cities policy committes and are well-versed in Cal Cities policy development processes and procedures. Both individuals also have experience with fiscal related matters and this familiarity will assist during the resolution review process. Page 993 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Actively participating in the policy-making process during the General Assembly supports the City Council's Core Values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and continuous improvement. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Voting Delegate Letter and Form Page 2 Page 994 � OF AIG U E CITIES Council Action Advised by August 31, 2021 June 16, 2021 TO: City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo — September 22-24, 2021 Cal Cities 2021 Annual Conference & Expo is scheduled for September 22-24, 2021 in Sacramento. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (during General Assembly) on Friday, September 24. At this meeting, Cal Cities membership considers and acts on resolutions that establish Cal Cities policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to Cal Cities office no later than Wednesday, September 15. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. Please note: Our number one priority will continue to be the health and safety of participants. We are working closely with the Sacramento Convention Center to ensure that important protocols and cleaning procedures continue, and if necessary, are strengthened. Attendees can anticipate updates as the conference approaches. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. • Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration will open mid-June at www.cacities.org. In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. • Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but ATTACHMENT 1 age 995 Suite 400, Sacramento, - • only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. • Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges. The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the Sacramento Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September 22, 8:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, September 23, 7:00 a.m. —4:00 p.m.; and Friday, September 24, 7:30 a.m.- 11:30 a.m. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League's office by Wednesday, September 15. If you have questions, please call Darla Yacub at (916) 658-8254. Attachments: • Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate/Alternate Form � OLEAGUE IORN CITIES CITY. 2021 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to Cal Cities office by Wednesday, September 15, 2021. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. To vote at the Annual Business Meeting(General Assembly),voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE Name: Name: Title: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES OR ATTEST: I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). Name: Email Mayor or City Clerk Date Phone (circle one) (signature) Please complete and return by Wednesday, September 15, 2021 to: Darla Yacub, Assistant to the Administrative Services Director E-mail: dyacub@cacities.org Phone: (916) 658-8254 � OEAiGUE CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates;these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates,may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk,may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates,but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute,the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. � �� � �� age 998