Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-08-11 Agenda Packet CITY OF ■ . CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA August 11 , 2021 7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 23, 2021. C2. Consideration to adopt Staff Retreat Meeting Minutes of July 14, 2021. (No meeting July 28, 2021.) D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE - W&W LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. - A request to subdivide a vacant 2-acre parcel into 6 lots for the development of 6 single-family residences, a Tree Removal Permit to remove 16 Heritage Trees, and a Minor Exception for increased wall height for a site within the Low (L) Residential District. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project is exempt under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects (Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit and Minor Exception. (SUBTT20353, DRC2020-00195, DRC2021-00119, DRC2021-000338). D2. LOCATED AT 8443 HAVEN AVENUE — HAVEN CITY MARKET—A request to modify an existing Conditional Use Permit (DRC2015-00959) and to add an Entertainment Permit to allow for indoor and outdoor entertainment and temporary uses at an existing food hall located within the Industrial Park District, Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Commercial Overlay District. The action is categorically exempt from the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities; APN: 0208-622-27. Conditional Use Permit Modification, Entertainment Permit (DRC2021-00149, DRC2021-00195). D3. General Plan Amendment to amend the land use element to add three new zoning designations known as City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, and redesignate 62 parcels identified in Exhibit 1 of the staff report from their existing land use designations to one of the new land use designations. (DRC2021-00281) Development Code Amendment to establish three new zoning districts known as City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, establish development standards and permitted uses for each new zoning district, and remove 8 parcels from the Haven Avenue Overlay and 1 parcel from the Industrial Commercial Overlay. (DRC2021-00282) Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 41 of the 62 parcels within the city to one of the three new zoning districts. (DRC2021-00283) Planned Community Amendment to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 of the 62 parcels to the new Urban Corridor zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Corridor zoning district. (DRC2021-00284) Specific Plan Amendment to amend the Victoria Specific Plan to rezone 6 of the 62 parcels within the specific plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. (DRC2021-00285) Master Plan Amendment to amend the Town Square Master Plan to rezone 2 of the 62 parcels within the master plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. (DRC2021-00286) An addendum to the 2010 General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared for this project. All of these items will be forwarded to City Council for final consideration following the Planning Commission's recommendation on each. E. General Business - None F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a Speaker Card located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. HPC/PC Agenda —August 11, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Communications." Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:OOpm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,279 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, August 5, 2021, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Agenda —August 11, 2021 Page 3 of 3 ME,-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 235 2021 7:00 P.M. MEETING MINUTES The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on June 23, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:01 p.m. A. Roll Cal Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; David Eoff, Sr. Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 9, 2021. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Morales to approve Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0 vote. (Abstain Oaxaca) D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED AT 6386 SAPPHIRE STREET— GEORGE BOTROS FOR SAINT JUSTINA ORTHODOX CHURCH —A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 18,506 square foot Sunday school and social hall facility in the Very Low (VL) Residential District. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, this project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption, Section 15332—In-Fill Development Projects APN: 1062-332-25; Design Review and Conditional Use Permit Modification. (DRC2020-00199, DRC2020-00471 Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. George Botros, Architect, available for questions. Roger Parsons, Resident, parking concern and asked if it will be paved. George Botros answered parking lot will be completely paved. Jerry Pennington, Resident, asked when will project be started and completed. George Botros answered projected to be started in 6 months; completion 2-3 years. Priest of Church, Resident, any issues will get resolved immediately. Great relationship with neighbors. **name unintelligible**, Congregant of Church, expressed in favor and the mentioned benefits of having the hall. Chairman Guglielmo closed the public hearing. Commissioners concur and are in favor of the project. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Commissioner Oaxaca to approve Resolution 21-39 and 21-40. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. E. General Business Ell. PROGRESS UPDATE ON PROPOSED CAMINO PRADERA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Mike Smith, Principal Planner, presented Commissioners with an update on Camino Pradera development standards. Chairman Guglielmo opened for public comments. Renee Massey, Resident, expressed she is looking forward to the meeting. Mentioned it may take up to two meetings, since it's been so long. Looks forward to working with facilitator so things can move on. E2. ANNUAL SELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR THE COMMISSION AND APPOINTMENTS TO OTHER COMMITTEES. Commissioner Dopp was appointed unanimously as Vice-Chairman, 1-year term of the Planning Commission. Motion by Commissioner Guglielmo, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Commissioner Oaxaca was appointed unanimously as Chair, 2-year term of the Planning Commission. Motion by Commissioner Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 23, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Draft HPC/PC Meeting Design Review Trails Advisory Public Art Committee Committee Committee CHAIRMAN —Oaxaca MEMBER—Williams MEMBER— Morales MEMBER— Dopp (remain) (remain) (remain) VICE CHAIR— Dopp MEMBER - Oaxaca MEMBER—Guglielmo (remain) (remain) 1ST ALTERNATE— Dopp ALTERNATE— Dopp (remain) (remain) F. Director Announcements Mike Smith mentioned July 14t" PC Agenda will have no items, but we plan to have a Retreat in Tri- Communities conference room 6:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. Dinner will be provided and start at 6:00p.m. Retreat will begin at 6:30 p.m. Agenda forthcoming. G. Commission Announcements Commissioner Oaxaca expressed his appreciation to all for providing service to our community in the past 15 months and continue to help our applicants get done what they need to get done. He said it's impressive City was able to keep projects moving along during that time. H. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 7:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: HPC/PC Meeting Minutes —June 23, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Draft CITY OF ■ . CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RETREAT AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER NEW LOCATION: TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA July 14, 2021 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. MEETING MINUTES The Staff Retreat meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on July 14, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:14 p.m. A. Roll Cal Planning Commission present: Chairman Oaxaca, Vice Chair Dopp, Commissioner Guglielmo, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Oaxaca opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Discussion Planning Commission and Staff Discussion: 1. Past— Evaluation and Discussion of Approved Projects. 2. Present — Healthy RC Development Checklist. 3. Future — Draft General Plan and Future Project Review. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, explained tonight's meeting will be about having an informal discussion, and talk about how staff can support the Commission and work together as a team. Talked about how to work through any issues Commissioners may confront in reviewing projects. A debrief by Mike Smith, Principal Planner, to find out how Commissioners feel on the end results of projects they approved, if they were successful or not successful. Also, talked about General Plan that is in the works on the new vision on development of the city and expectation for those projects. How projects will be reviewed going forward on all categories; residential, industrial, commercial. This is a good time to brainstorm what kind of tools might be helpful to implement. Looking for ideas from Commissioners if they would like to share. There will be no conclusion tonight but generate ideas and come back and talk about internally. D. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Dopp, second by Commissioner Morales, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: HPC/PC Staff Retreat Minutes —July 14, 2021 Page 2 of 2 Draft CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1' DATE: August 11, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE -W&W LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. - A request to subdivide a vacant 2-acre parcel into 6 lots for the development of 6 single-family residences, a Tree Removal Permit to remove 16 Heritage Trees, and a Minor Exception for increased wall height for a site within the Low(L) Residential District APN: 0202-061-32. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project is exempt under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit and Minor Exception. (SUBTT20353, DRC2020-00195, DRC2021-00119, DRC2021-00338) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353, Design Review DRC2020-00195, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 and Minor Exception DRC2021-000338 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to subdivide a vacant 2-acre parcel and construct 6 single-family residences. BACKGROUND: The rectangular project site is approximately 350 feet east to west and 250 feet north to south. The existing grade is approximately 1,475 feet along the north property line and 1,465 along the south property line, resulting in a grade change of about 10 feet. Onsite vegetation includes native and non-native vegetation and various trees scattered on site (Exhibit A). Street improvements along the project's frontage on Hellman Avenue have not been constructed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District West Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District PROJECT ANALYSIS: A. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353: The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property into 6 numbered lots for residential development and 1 lettered lot (Exhibit B). The lettered lot is intended for stormwater drainage and will be maintained by a future homeowner's association for the subject subdivision. All 6 lots front a cul-de-sac which will be constructed with the proposed subdivision. This cul- de-sac will connect to an existing street, Billings Place. As demonstrated on Table A and B of Sheet "T" on the project plans, all 6 lots comply with all pertinent technical development standards such as lot area, lot width, lot depth and lot frontage, as outlined in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC). B. Design Review DRC2020-00195: The project includes a Design Review for the construction of 6 single-family residences on the 6 proposed lots. As demonstrated in Table B on sheet "T" of the project plans, all proposed house product meets all pertinent standards for single-family development within the Low (L) Residential District, per RCMC Table 17.36.010-1. Five (5) separate floor plans are proposed, along with six (6) different elevations featuring variations in the Craftsman and Mission architectural styles (Exhibit B). This exceeds the three (3) different floor plans required, and two (2) varying types of elevations (architectural styles) required per floor plan, as prescribed in RCMC Section 17.122.010. The Development Code requires subdivisions of 5 or more lots to include a minimum of 25 percent of single-story plans. The project features a total of three (3) single- story homes and three (3) two-story homes which exceeds this requirement. Each floor plan and architectural variation includes wall and roof plane articulation and carries the architectural design theme to each elevation (360-degree architecture). Each plan includes design elements that emphasize the chosen architectural style including the use of stucco or wood siding, exposed rafter tails, architecturally relevant window and door surrounds, window shutters, wrought iron accents, and tile roofs. The plans also include the use of decorative garage and front entry doors that emphasize the architectural style. All front yards will be landscaped with a variety of drought-tolerant shrubs, groundcovers, and trees, in compliance with the City's residential landscape requirements per RCMC Sec. 17.56.070. C. Minor Exception DRC2021-00338: Each lot will be separated by a 6-foot-high decorative block wall. Existing block walls will be kept in place along the project's north and east boundaries. A new 7-foot-high combination wall is proposed along the south project boundary. This wall will consist of a retaining wall approximately 2 feet high, and a garden wall that is 5 feet high. The maximum height of this combination wall will be 7 feet (as measured from the midpoint of the retaining wall). As this exceeds the 6-foot height limit for walls on residential property as prescribed in RCMC Table 17.48.050-1, the applicant has applied for a Minor Exception requesting for a height increase of 1 foot over the maximum wall height allowed in the underlying zone. D. Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119: There are currently 40 trees on-site, 16 of which are considered Heritage Trees due to their size or species. Most trees on the project site are in poor condition. As part of the project, the applicant is proposing to remove all the trees with the exception of one avocado tree. As required, the applicant has applied for a Tree Removal Permit to remove the Heritage Trees. The project's landscape plan shows that the project will plant a total of 69 trees in the entire subdivision, more than replacing the number of trees proposed to be removed, regardless of Heritage Tree status. E. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted for the project on March 17, 2021. The Page 2 meeting had 11 attendees. Residents asked questions about the project's entitlement process, environmental review, and expressed concerns about a potential lack of privacy resulting from the development of the site. In response to resident comments, the applicant moved the house footprints on Lots 1, 3, and 4 further from the neighboring properties. Extensive tree screening was also implemented along the north property lines of Lots 1 and 6 in order to provide for privacy between the said lots and the neighboring properties. In order to provide for privacy for the existing homes to the south which sits at a lower grade than the project site, single-story homes set back at least 11 feet from the southern property line are plotted on Lots 3 and 4. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on June 1, 2021. The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission, provided that applicant extend the rear patios for all lots to at least 12 feet deep, in order to maximize the usability of outdoor space. This is reflected in the in the Design Review Committee Comments (Exhibit C). The applicant has since incorporated this change in the project. G. Public Art: Per RCMC Chapter, 17.124.020(B)1, any project with a density that is equal to 4 dwelling units or below is exempt from the City's Public Art requirement. As the project is proposing a density of 3 dwelling units per acre, the project is exempt from the City's Public Art requirements. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres, surrounded by single- family residential uses. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no written correspondence, phone calls, or in person inquiries have been received regarding the project notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: One of the City Council's core values is "providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all." The high-quality neighborhood provided by the project supports this core value by continuing to provide world-class development within the City for the benefit of future and current residents. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Exhibit B - Project Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments (June 1, 2021) and Action Agenda Exhibit D - Draft Resolution 21-41 of Approval Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353 Exhibit E - Draft Resolution 21-42 of Approval Design Review DRC2020-00195 Exhibit F - Draft Resolution 21-43 of Approval Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 Exhibit G - Draft Resolution 21-44 of Approval Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 Exhibit H - Conditions of Approval Exhibit I - Statement of Agreement Page 3 LA e � ,� 0 � •-,,+yyy.^.,,,',,.' - �_ •.....Nr .. ._ .`�a _ � _''r__� ran. • �,.' Pepperidge Ln Pepperidge Ln �, � - }'. _ , , ' �_'i [ _� p .;h} — 1 , -�1 .Pr•�i - .� {y � y: . r �. V � � � � ■ ! �. 1 777 � I.� '4:. - y .�_�.} - ..c dl qs - Ledig Or I - - 9 •�' {� Ledig Dr Ixdig Dr 'fie y� r1rc re'ssive InIL r ne or I PROJEC SITE Ills i. nI ' '�'... r' - p- : J"'"`r �' i Jam ' `L Monte Vista _ n t k Mo A. .-. - ' Monte Visten .'� 7 r Mante.Vis[a St - Monte Vista St h,• - f � �� �•. Monte Vista St � r '-� 41 PROJECT PLANS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIL PLAN SHEET INDEX m V SITE UTILIZATION MAP C2 TETAT VE TRACNT MAP MAP �o C CONCEPTUALGRADING PLAN FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20353 3 CONCEPTUAL =JAW �.� C4 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PUN-CROSS SECTION sgLL 05 CONCEPTUAL BLOCK WALL PLAN Z 06 PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE AND DRAINAGE PUN J N - - --—-- C7 CUT/FILL MAP `E o4nit� t % ]pei idge Ln ♦♦` 3 hAignQn�4tet ..—..—/ 600' R ra IT 1 ID 5 VACANT p CIL `D L Mime Vista \ Monte visa St / z � o ♦ . Q Q ♦ ♦ J rn / H J Z ♦ , w F� O aa aw Z>o N p¢g _ (IIIaiv�nLe P'ooN Service a � Biel itv # > ----- - o oU)o H cn w 0 <n ��E� La Vine St L Q GRAPHIC SCALE OWNER/APPLICANT: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SOILS ENGINEER: MR. FRANK HU W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. S.R. CLARKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE& CALLAND ENGINEERING, INC. R00xH WL 1521 E EAGLE RIDGE 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD.,SUITE#1 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE#1 DEVELOPMENT, INC. 576 LAMBERT ROAD ���m romPNWECT LA VERNE, CA 91746 UPLAND, CA 91786 UPLAND, CA 91786 110 COPPERWOOD WAY, #P, BREA, CA 92821 rvo CONTACT: FRANK HU CONTACT: WINSTON LIU, PE CONTACT: TOM LAU OCEANSIDE, CA 92058 CONTACT: JACK LEE (909) 632-8386 (909) 608-7118 (909) 608-7118 CONTACT: SEAN CLARKE (714) 671-1050 nC;Ere 760) 716-31 as OF BN— SUBTT20353&DRC2020-00195 Exhibit B IF 6i WLY 2G 6D 6a. ao q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 210 My = � 11.0' S- 22.0'� �I 19TH STREET <n •- 1 a 4 -I 4 MIGN NETEE ST c+� z1 _ _ _ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20353 BILLINGS LEDIG PL o 2S 1 w c `EXISTING SIDEWASK REPOSED Z z V c Wo SIDEWALK 51 ohs K a SITE NN //// \ PROPOSED 8" BILLINGS PLACE CURB RS"8"ER EXISTING 8"J `EXISTING 8' p CURB&GUIIER HELLMAN AVENUE CURB k GUTTER CURB&GUTTER to out ITS NTS. ¢ MONTE VISTA } ST a klm a VCR SEWER NN 4 m U' EXlsrws 6 wATE ? / I I �� I I BASELINE ROAD r LOT 34 OF -3 LO- /3 OF LOT 32 OF LO;P 3-1 OF% LOT 30 OF 1 m, A I I- /I ^ I u LOCATIONNICINITY MAP m;& TRACT J92 r cr ��2Acr az �' raAcr r 2 Tr�acr 1��2 o!f Iv I 1" 3 ---r0 3/4'IRON 10 E,N G LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT i0 SCALE IIIIII���/// 0.6 + 1 I / IBRACT N30 2 0 1 /� -- BEING A SUBCOUCAMON OFGAS LOT O 9 OF OFLOC 12.IN THE CITf t6.0' OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, nw \ PAGES 6,RECORDS OF SAID COUNN. _ _ _ .•' __35001 GENERAL NOTES. III ---A' 125++Q,. -�• / RIS -��_ _ m`y, \ 5 -\\ -� J J J PROJECT ADDRESS: 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE III U \ •`•. • j \ / i • RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CAUFORNIA 91730 -� 1•%+ FROpoRED j / \\ / _-- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0202-061-32-0000 s e 111G0 \ z l---- / /o ^ _�- __-7' PREYING LAND USE: R--RESIDENTAL / � R---RESIDENTI __-_-LOT / OPO ED LAND USE: IAL YY ._ M k/ -- L PROP PARKING: 18 LOT Q/ -- or a oq DEVELOPMENT AREA GROSS AREA 87,527 SF,2.01 AC ° I :v / 11.�34'�F/ —�� / ., TRACT 0280 W 8,74Y, ��. ,• --' Ci -------' i �_J .("' DATE MAP PREPARED: JUNE 2020 ED t2.0' I /r \I \_ -/ UTILELU-P LOTS: SIX(6)RESIDENTIAL LOTS TIL 1 ✓�o i' C*ny�i\, ZZ1 NUMBER _ 11 I �!"" / -__- .,,11✓i B J PURVEYORS 1111 11�^ \ T3Y" U70 EAS COOTHILN EDISON CO. p870 EAST FOOTHILL BLVD .L III 124.9' - / a / - 14Q9 / - \ -I UPIPND.CA 917BG 111 o .,ea� I8 a \, �/ rx� ,\,6 , pl wnrvsE / SOUTHERN SRN GAS1 Po'{{.. Ijl '_ • / z /e T \ McTr GAS; sourHERN GAS COMPANY 1� // 1 I+•r 0/� --_-- _ \ ONTTARIO.WEST 91761 II HA _ __—_ rJ 1 (800)443 3466 -- i / WATER k SEWER. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOT 5 -= - A LOT / P. BIN 638 I� \ I / CUCAMONGA CA 91730 rc III it 1 \ ` .1 / LdT as / (909)987 2591 �j 1 ` IOA / g • I BENCH MARK 8,983 SF TRACT 02,3E - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK#17 1 3T. 50 ELEV=1478.110 NAVE 88 22' 0 I' I \ \ u t 15' �� / ND CHISELED•X"ON FIRE HYDRANT ACROSS STREET FROrCCC ppqq�''�,,y� �\\ -�- 69 8 HELLMAN AVENUE.w10i@R'H'N2 �I I�� I BASIS OF BEARINGS: OFPROPOSED e" 'A FREPHm _zo I 1L __-_____ BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF SUBJECT / W \\\ PROPERTY BEING NORTH 89'39'05'EAST AS SHOWN PER 125.0' l 125.6 1 t 18.0 TRACT NO,9280,M.B.133/28-30, iz AREA SUMMARY —kTo� _hi.— osm - I I�+ LOT 32 ---- LOT NUMBER AREA(SF) \\ l I 1111 -rRr�,.r I C C7�`r�9 I LOT 1 11,035 � r LOT 2 10,752 (n b pgQP 01D ogAIH / r I \ A LOT 3 14.631 z _____ 4 14,631 I� h _ . "� _ g \ Jilr 5 / " \ \ / LOT 5 9.983 1111 — __ RNI I` y , � LOT B 6.7a5 J ¢ EnsEXHENT RaOw ^I a�h z 1 p / /��� LOT A 2.280 F Q U LV"t 3 1� 11I I I BILLINGS PLACE 15,408 Z F Q (e)s� / / III I I TOTAL 87,521 W z r Z DRAIN S�Eq Si OT 4/ z r ' 1 1 LJT 31 z c•�• /TA V 14/713SF �---- w 1+.• \ \V AI A`\ �1 1 .�3T 8F 20 (,,. 8F./i, ., / ��� V 11 TRACT 0280 i / 0_Q V 1 I iz" �ymll m Y posEo °' / +I I / I Q z Wq ¢ G �NARDINO .ANIY _ / LEGEND, � V E EASEMENT pea 1 11 i A 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY W w< e LOT LINE Lu CENTERL NE Q J V F gg ••° 6 1 \\Il y-� u B / s'�_ \ I / \ W= ,a EFFETE LINE F 2 ZG ___ __ EASEMENT NE F _ O Q ``(1460) --_- - , - a - - _ _-_------ _—_—' 144j1 11/ I I _______ _ — /___ / III ,r LOT 23 I i LOT 30 LOT 1 TRACT 0280 i 221 i� / —�---- �� -TRACT 0280 i 1 _ N LOT 24 TRAC TRACT 9280 1 i 11 T i / � � � CIECIED WE DRAWN WE LOT i \\\ I// GRAPHIC SCALE ` r PROOECT NO, TRACT 0280ET NC2UMBEre. SHE // ` �NFE�T1 ENE— SUBTT20353 OF &D—��-------' RC2020-00195 - I\ / m � e vOP—ER — I , �'� / ExlsnNc 6 wATE 120 z J �._ I I I I LOT 3a or G LOT/3a�r � LOT 32�r Lo�'si or , I Lor 30 or I I� — ,���I / TRACT-14-192 �/ T-? CT-14-102 TRACT 14102 �� T'RACT 14-p2 / TRACT 14102 y/ I\ FD LEA &TAG RCE 15446 ACOEP D AS LOCATION OF I'IRON PIPE,L 2529 \ PER TR CT N0.9280,M.B.133/28-30 P o I II'1I� r 11 0Vi I FDIRONkPIPE,NO TACT I I` I I mom m B \ I 0.O6 TRAOIH 0. ST , c OCK II ER C�T21J0 M 133 8 & J 68186 BL TO FA � FL )2.09°11BC / ... w.�. n a \a. k..... L 6. 4TF580 �' � l \\ : g O // GARAGE_ __--LO 1 / •t3s.• Lo 3a 1 26T.3 P: F.F. 0.60 s' F.F.472.30 i an�o TO .\' ria.�6 F.F. 39, e'..�I YRACY 0230 I I W \ _ PAD=471.I' CaARAGE _) __SAD-47g:6 .y L 7 III kl ��Ir Z Lu W v 6=0.004 sl IL m :?ass:-,3: F�2x Pin' . as e Tn � _ s Z o 1+111IFF�-°f�J e 6.9a'te G1�sT.2 aF,1 /1 Ik•,. rGff gR AQE -� 5'WIDELcOE rt —��. o %J F 4,77:I . \\\ YJ I 1 1 \\ \ v- �. F F=467,} s p \ F. =466.D ,.I LO 12 e I rJ 1 U \ o '�" - A LOT za 4isx FzF= 0 D467.0 ,a.6x C"�r- , TRACT 92S0 o PAD=48Z.P' - - -'a / I ro a � i _ 4 T \ \ 4sa@o 95 EL `\ •':a '.': / ':'b:s 5FL'�S.a \ I\.\.' � z w Fs.. .[.I'T j5 I P.Irwcu. - i `� \\ �,00xc o•k? 7 YRACr 9280 Y r- \\ __ o ROPM E FL \ 4k41 CL LQT3 �ry� ..�.. .... I W V V A s2;0 o LOT 4 ��:......j11y o /u>o II.' .yt M' (a)s' a6 , / F2' o I�„ / A I V' .' F F.-464.00 4 .'.�ry z< t o0 0> a6a 4 / III LOT 3-1 I I _ \ ah z \ \ E _ $ '� FF-463.3 V �Fs PAD-463.5 :yyg.' _ I \ --- - n Z PADyls33 `% I � I I '... 6�� i .� .'�.: I I I I TRACE 0230 Q v v v / I, GARAGE/�� - I v n�FF / R yA. :�4 Ta., F.F'=6 �0 �� 6a.Som �'a ,I p 1 _ z1 64 63 \\ \\ III / .'.'.' ao ''. s3so'.' III l"!�y...::2R.WN..�� 1#.- CR Z Z I � L \ IN Fy rc, PgSFD = s' '1- .av _ '��ii' -A—E-'EARO.N s26o \ W W Q \VI 11 11 I I_ _-- iI- EsriE— n _ , 60° /� — ---- --- — �— ��IRII \` �U W 2 �, l I I _GnIN' = IL U 11 SEPARATE PERMWALL IP° / / I I W rn z II ',/ LOT 23 I i LOT 2B I v f4 c0 .O v !/� LOT 22 v TRACY 9230 i p7 2a i � TRACT D280 - -j--------- ��� _ TRACY 0290 I/ / --�r vI i TRACT 023O i LJ�rv27 m� 1 OT P5 ' 7R9rar E TRACT J290 / vv \ A\ n aw GAP IC SFAPROJECT NO, %J/ r LOT 20 TRACT 0290 LOT2B ErNUMBER C3 _ _ i/ _--- TRACT 9230 OF SUBTT20363& RC2020-00 95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - CROSS SECTION E TRACT NO. 20353 fag. PROPOSED v BUILDING $ PROPOSED 5' A w 3& DRAINAGE USEMENi PROPOSED L PROPOSED PROPOSED BLOCK WALL BUILDING NE � I 32.2'3 LOT 4 BUILDING PROPOSED fi' I 1S 0' FLY RAv BLOCK WALL LOT 2 Exlrnrvc 33.0 15 1 BUILDING II- 330' -' EXISTING I XISTNG LOT 5 SIG,p E%ISTING E y GRADE JP 033' 22.0' 11' GRADE _ -___ GRADE--- ____ IIBI^ -__ /- 2.0' 0.33' F.F:466.50 2.09.- - _2R MIN. III EXISTING �20-----_1).0' y �i 2% 4.09. PA 463.80 BLOCK WALL 2% 3% 4 �� (2%) 2�-T PAD=463.30 PPD=466.0 �-IN TO REMAIN =PROPOSED --_---- 2.0% GRADE L� %ISTING 2% %ISTINSIDEWALK PAD-46J'20 SIDEWALK EXISTING 8' EXISTING8"ON, AGE CURB&GUTTER CURB&GUTTER SWALE SECTION A-A HORS,1"-10 SECTION D-D SECTION E-E VERTICAL 1"=5' - HORS.1-=10' VERTICPLI VERTICAL 1'-5 p% Pr 1 J.2 PROPOSED LOT 1 5.0'� 2iING fi'i BUILDING 3.0' PROPOSED 6' RI RETAINING WALL I CK TO REMA 15.3 IN 13'6 ' 37.5' XISTNG�E I i BUILDING III 5.0' PROPOSED 13.2' PROPOSED 6' PI o BLOCK WALL IIIIMN. 3.6% FF,F-4J1.30 Z-1 BILDING LOT2INJ 4 � ____-__� __ ix F.F.=466.50 M_ MIN 1��� 30.222.2' BUILDING LOT3 50 PPRAIE_ PROPOSED NEWo EXIET PPD-JO BOPROPOSED COMBINATION RETAINING/EXISTING) I FR TANOING WALL PER GRADESE PERMGRADE ---___-_-__ -- EXISTING 0.33' I 465.46 GRADE I ---- 2% ---PAD-463.50 2 EXISTING WALL FL _ GRADE -_-_-___ , e.aes4 Exlrnrvc ___-____ _ .q �m PROTECT IN 2% _� ----- - - I PLACE E TING 4612 BUILDING SECTION C-C FL ILI VERTICAL 1"=5' � � � W z � Z uN r o F J U Z W F 5¢ a _ Z. BUILDING� 10.0' P pr PROEWER/STORMNG POSED 15'WIDE W Q I DRAIN&SECONDARY Q Q RETAININGTo WALL' IN' 13.6 PROPOSED LOT6 5.0 1 BLOCKopoSWN_L ED IL EMERGE EMERGENCY W W Q U 2 0.3i� BUILDING 25. 1s.8' 8.0' > U Q 4 II 6.1 2.0 13D' PR POSED 6 Lu J r p _-F_F__ 80' PROPOSE LOT5 4 WALL eu- F U _ „n �- z- - --_ EL F a Z CK 6.5' ac PAD�I �.�Jli i F.F 171.1D- 2S 5.3' 201 Z PAD-4J1.J0 I PROPOSED NEW E%ISTING L� - __ G GRAD E 4JFL2 E%GSI RPDE __-___ __ f0(D i ?, __________________69 9.0' 250' BUILDING LOT PER 11.5 COMBINATION RETAINING/ o F.F.=46].JO - E%ISTING FREESTANDING WALL 33 X MN 2,0% --�3T, ____L_______ GRADE 6.8' 0.33'El PERMIT 3 466.83 PAD=46J.20 _______--- FL 466.J0 _----- -- -- _ EXISTING WALL Ilo RGTEC11_ IN 5% Im PLACE N 2% Pao=463.30 � jl II D:c BUILDING SECTION B-B T SIT 11MA,wi HORZ.1"=10' EXISTING) // RACE PROJECT NO, VERTICAL 1"=5 TNUMBER: C4 OF SUBTT20353&DRC2020-00195 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BLOCK WALL PLAN o �o — GIs IG B ICP T i O R F% LOT 30 O LOT 3�1 OF LO-%33 OF LOT 32 OF' LO;P 3-1 � v�^ TRACT-k1192 a m� 7;} CT�4192 '� 7RAC7-14-192 ,�- TRACT-kk1,-1�2 �� 7RACf 14�C2 nl , _ 1 E.IrnNG�LaGK-- J Iry,Ran _ I -....----- ... .�.... - .. .. 5. .. .. ra' RIs — ....... .. .. ,. .... .. � LEGEND. PROPERTr Bourvoaar/LOT urvE .. . ............. :.. 4 -..: .. CE NTERL NE � {zr.-..l..... IIIII 01SITE EASEMENT NE LOT 1 -- 1 TC TOP OF OBRB tf?T�6/ - ----- -ii,o3 , LOT 84 GW NE HP HIGH PONT 11r�m ss-. .. IF,745 SFIF 13PA"'\\ol. , II \ i - ----PAD=470.,E o. TRACT 9280 ZLu PE PwsN LaooloN III 12aL. 1z.o' I aJ�.....,� - , r R i 5 ES FINISH SURFACE LOCK - 25G I r j A.�..' ` ,d" % TF TOP OF BLOCK WALL FOOTING c.,rvK wall �� r TG TOP OF GRATE Yt t.�, a �.F. `;jq INV INKRT 114B' i `^¢. S PROPOSED DRAINAGE P AWTATLELR N �NANGE ETA N NG BLOCK WL FREE STANDING BLOCK _ _ -___- - -_ f. LOT/nn 4 e I I. 1� 4 �..V. / o LOT 5 - ��` 101752 SF !o£ o G. vuKke.. i NOTE: p $F ,--� 1 \ \ F F 466,50 o ��g LdT 33 / ALL PRoaoseo aLocrc wnu sNAu DE E 4 z v ' v PAD 46&0 TRACT 0-50 -r COMPROMSED OF DEC ORAT UE BLOCK P F F-467.70 o __ , 1 a z. - / CMC scc.n.4a.oao a PAD 467.p Y 1 ' zz• m Ili f I' I 1�11 1h , � �N �{rr , wI0 �\ 11 - L ---- - - - Il�r° I G v 6Loa \ -s0 T ---- --- 125 0 as D Tw a.,G Tr � 125-6' LOT 32 / 1° _ 7 \, T, TRACT 9280 ' I 4� �x 1 Z r E. g d r LOT4 To M „ 91 ,':.Klan• •° a LOT-3- I EASEMENT w a ...,.:. ,' / 6 31 1d 831$F /T A v� 1g713 SF LOT }__-- W w z v 1 .. �,,. ,' , TRACT 9280 1 / a >o 5, .~ r ,1 RF=463.60 a"' SF' F.464.00 L Q� j I PA6 463.3i. Y Rosw '� f°" *y /PAD=463� a RNA .� 1 w FJ5�Z Q N6 x a .� ry E FFn 1 , W Q U �I I t. v J �1 � , W — s.- — 2 % I.I.I Q=V S _ � "He° <o m M.e.tlI3N GEO (1460) _ - b B i rlAz�eemNlNti,- __ - N c -----w ---' / ' / -------- � ----'----_ GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 23 r LOT 30 •ELOT Pp II TRACT 9280 ' LOT 2a1 i� �' TRACT 0280 I _ IiK�6n _ TRACT 9280 1 i TRACT 0280 T aon LOT 25 / TRACT 0230 \ ET NBNBER. T CS —i / \ of sKEErs I l i I-' I ` -------------------� SUBTT20353&DRC2020-00195 / . Fin WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN i IlE P = FOR TRACT 20353 N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q _ GRAPHIC SCALE v 00 1 / �I III IIZ / II EZISTiNc s wATCR/ I � l i LOT 34 OF I � � � i I � L07i 38 Jr �� LOT 82 OFf/31 C1F // �� / 4 / TRACT-L:1J2 00 TFRXCT-114-1D2 II� TRACT 14102, �� TRACT 1% 2 �II Y oN PIP ( RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE&INSPECTION \ FO LEA &TAG.RCE 15446 1 ACCEP o s LoIAnory o yJ , CONSTRUCTION: PER TR CTANO-9280,M.BF t}}I E e I I �I7 m q A \ s I / 03-"IRON PIPE,rvp'rkGl 1MR.52 FRANK LHU E Ii \ T s'RCR I I`2�O. LA V E.EAGLE RIDGE T REUa MER 1RACT,N6.9280 — K u I I B. }3 8}o LA VERNE,CA 91746 CONTACT:FRANK HU Y ' — - (909) 832-6388 k P051 CONSTRUCTION: � HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION �A_ Y�I l-TLW-m1� G/A/RG6/ - 7RC_ LEGEND 27 z' PROJECT BOUNDARY - 1 DRAINAGE BOUNDARY FOR EACH BMP o \ S-0.00�70' dam' x r FLOW LINE II IQ _ l� It W r., s.{ sNMI5a _ Mw �e`� __ WOMP BMP AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE .00w a i a ¢ a - i oaO E GAIE ENT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NECESSARY WATER QUALITY / kkk rc/ I MANAGEMENT PLAN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DEVICES HAVE GARAGE 6 ` GRADE ,. \a BEEN CONSTRUCTED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND ARE FUNCTIONAL ,r R III _ l�N FF=46], f� zs.s 1 U \ \� E\46fi..' •Y I if TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE DATE BELOW. 466' 19 a WEIDONG LIU RCE �/'�-231LZ 46� _ rr{1 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE ELEV. V G J 1�11¢ rwr } ` •_- - T2 YJR 13 ELEV i I �nTO' WOMP EMIR MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 465.14 E . 14 ! �- I Rjl i / MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBIIJTY:HOA / I / o,z x _ FUNDING SOURCE:OWNER/HOA TEN MAINANCE SCHEDULE:TWICE A YEAR INSPECTION CB 6 AND MAINTENANCE AS NEEDED. [L 462.1 ELEV 16 —— -- W / . [ STARTUP DATE:WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETECD fRAi z z . ��. y,r s�' •` / �, ; . WOMP BMP LATITUDINAL/LAGITUDINAL 4}A -3 ✓ -RETENTION Qp1 p Q 463 �G / 0. _�_ _(34.128372. -117.602049) z— Q W ELEv. /, "m/ 462..E..>>.. W z C7 1 � aW>o d 1 Wg Q/ F 48400 lilt p0a<2 cm, C V A I III LO J z (4 3 PRoaose0 •.;� •� ��''' I i II I MAC W W a j > \ \ EGRETINTON CL' v v GARP�'� 6YSTEM G.=463 I j J U Q q B-4 = F.F 463 r.. 'b •° 2 2 0_13 L,_gE ---- 2.6ELE BEE. �. E =� �° �.. W o N0 J _ 31 / 1 h 1 F J N QZ W 11�r � ua NO cou Ea L ANDIN __ wi uAP 12aa - - 01 ING RrE PERMIT v , L Y 23 l ` III�I,% LO r 22 1 TRACT 8280 i / LOT 24 I _ TRACT�2�0 1 I r / d�� � YR ACY C23D // / I� \ NUMBER �EToC6geR v l i TRACT�280 / 9289vv _ OF SUBTT20353&DRC2020-00195 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUT/FILL MAPo TRACT MAP NO. 20353 GRAPHIC SCALE g a m 2.L 4.71 \54 2.1 �jC'�.1t�2 t�.0 .60 �.18 0,76 9y3 1'Z5. 2 3 A38 O6 }j22 1.15 4806'. 6 0.08 Oy0.4.42 O.IO 0.]3 1.22,.]6 2,17 2.5'/ 3.2 41 (t'z61 - 1 1 1 T.25-1'23 0.80 0.X[9 0.3-,3.96: .] 5�4�.5{�.9Y S48 .84 031 �� t.31_ 1114� 2.06 y.'}y 3.98 4 yQ3F 92 + 1... .h _ _ _ ] 0.] 0.81 O88 0.]4 O.ES 10 9h1 0 088 Afl] 3`° s]aG,22 -3 3- (I-$� s4 0 N' G 2. 29 4/6 h / ]9 ,2�, T' 0.45 "1 0}�.Q�9 14 A. 0 446 d 125 50'5^r 4163 4.24 40 2.11 64 1 /] +9 / +/S 0 0.08 0.09 0.03 0. z580/�4 4 6 0 5.58 �.6 4.66 A13 9] \ '.�..p.... 3 080 p L 9 --_- 3- 1ia5�55�6 Qc 5 6.121 II 5.21 5.21 3.9 flhb°^m .3 '° • .-.'?.'.-jy. 4?:-'-:->:e 6.--7 ,"15�._F-$3��4fr ]43 � .t665,5,89'. .9 ] 4.• .¢ 5.]8 5.]6 5'6 4A4,2•}:Q:d?: -- \\ ..'..............:.'.'� ............... /1 y. /.../.../ 1z ".'a.e'._{s x _____-f� ].11 55I 6.41 02 58 {0 3p A 0.90 006/0.06 0.5?,�0.93 yt i9'i 3 �+/ - - - e I _ I: •r w 1 / / � 1 \�a I / 1 � ' _1•� % I 6.61 663 6.8] 6. 6.]4 6. `35 661 �A ] 8'.40- 03 11 1 6]� 6]1 6 6 II' S Or2 1.\ 46\O.OI�p. \10.8 0P9 Z�] 52 6.5E 6.2 6A} J.2} ].291 •1 E ,51 I.}4 i}3 ].,}/6:99 510 5"IN 1.}Si 0.5 OP3 0 �J <O.e l20 \ .1 9E s.es 6.04 6.s2 s3a 6.20 - - -s3$a ��ee,se-]-j'J.se J.se �i21\ +i..ib. - - o 4 'g�eiz x.y6 90 6. 9 5 8.52 BAB 70� 7.99 1T9\8.22\]. S.9 .J5/0 �- /--Y"--.-'.'. i �. / \ Y Y Ali \ I\ 11.4 .•�.. _ _ .._.. .. _ _ ��'�\4qyyer+ + I 09:• 0/ 5 9.05 .1B BBS"8.4$ 8.22 BS4 8.4 5. .'751'.3. - '-.&1".9'9& 3'-D.69.'Q.]t-.0.B1'-"0'09-'092-- \ I rb � 8833 �9.6] �$•0.26 �n 1 23�8 _. Q '_/� 62t'893. ] \E21\9.39 $.58 8.0Y4 S. :j).:2]d'.1. ':61r'A52'�8+50.'B11'. 19.6318.6J I+i.9J 7.4a,el'.9'23,.�'JZ.. ..... Z S]'. 79 398 4:.9 4.5J0.24 0.58 0.68\1�1J 6s/Ys.'26a II �' - - - - \ 1 '4 , j IIII J Q 3.6J 14.47 4.30 4i1L7.0 .8 3.]8 3.66 3 :1} �yV1 3.16/2.]2 2$ 18'SOB"f 51 10861}J66 0 N00 0.60 09 t0 t.}2 /&0 2.3,+102 2 III F Q U - - - - y - 7--W Q / \ \ 5Y\]16.'.P.SJ .]2 2.93 3.52 1418 4.00 3.85 3.]1 .s9 3.54 3.4] , Z]."q(�'.9 2.4] 2.d0 1 T 0.9] 0.62 *1 02] 98 1 46 1+ 1§Jz/2 SS'1'1 1 1 Wc~Z(� 2.561}.4, 3.89 3.]t 3.5] }.42 .29 }.29 3.2�z. .41�p+.h�il 2.63 2.X3 $+ .9 0.56 0.2d 09 3J (12J� IA0'206 2. 22 3 Q 6 --0,3byib.K�'Q44-�0.]4--.9B'-f52-.P31�-Y42'.2.Sf�'2:63- ffi�3 ,06 11 Q U o _.pz zY 1'',a' ,I � .e'3. .\`fa'... 1 W lJ,� +t+{. .'.I'.'.'.'.I......5 ..... U J LU \ / _ - ------------- - LLI U ----------- ~O - F EARTHWORK CUT..............7,850 CY Issuc: on,c: aenanmo y FILL..............1,770 CY cxccxco:w� oxnwrv:vn SHRINKAGE......320 CY(18%) sm6rg s rfil.:��oal rut site so-m�m sum s�nz ,n,m Ne1 rnemm EXPORT........6,080 CY oxawlxe mc: o w cxa?cT NO, ---------------------------------- SPECIAL NOTE: NUMBER: 1 oz naxx nx.�n.lmax a s o+wo••e ]646 m oio£c3 URPOSES ONLY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY QUANTITIES e 6 omeoax. THE QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR PERMIT AND BONDING c P j PRIOR TO START of GRADING SUBTT20353&DRC2020-00195 Prq NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A 6 PROJECT CT Data 6929 HEL MAN AVE., vid " 'Map NOT TO SCALE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 ¢ SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES D 0202-061-32 ZONING: RESIDENTIAL-L BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-B BUILDING CODE: 2019-MC,CPC,CEC,CMC 33 19TH 10 T. 6929 HELLMAN AVE., RANCHO W&WLANO,CIVIL CONSULTANTS INC. MIGNONETTE ST_ ARCHIIECNRE,aWL ENONNSUL&INTERIO2 /� A:DEVELOPMENT STANDARD ZONING REQUIREMENTS: 2335 W.FOOIHUL BLVD.,SIT 1,UPLAND CA 91786 CV CAMONGA, CA 91730 LOT AREA LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH FRONTAGE Q m LEDIG DR PHONE(909)608-7118 FAX(909f 946-1137 (MIN.7,200 SF)(MIN.65 FT.) (MIN.100 FT.) (MIN.40 FT) go3 W Pr*c4 Dke4®ry DIPaWng Index MOM E nsr sr. po ¢ LOT I 11,034 SF. 70 FT 146.9 FT. 72.6 FT. Z L� OWNER: ARCHITECT&CIVIL ENGINEER: DRAWING NUMBER AND PRE ISSUE DALE LOT 2 10,772 BE 80 FT. 125.6 FT. 83.3 FT. PROJECT a° N a FRANK HU WINSTON UU,P.E.&TOM LAU,A.I.A. LOT 3 14,641 SF 100.1,155.5 FT 125.6,59.3 FT. 52.9 FT ® m SITE `° Q 1925'ARIGHT AVE.,AD W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS q j LA VERNE,CA 91750 2335 W.FOOTHILL BLVD.,SUITE 1, LOT 4 14,998 SF. 100.1,154.5 FT 125,59.3 FT, 52.9 FT, ryry��Work a83 LL u TEL:(909)392-7562 UPLAND,CA 91786 �aa LOT 5 9,901 SF. 80 FT. 125 FT. 80 FT. 01 W ork 'g d'3 Z i TEL:(909)608-7118,FAH:(909)948-1137 LOT 6 8,670 SF. 70 FT 124.9 FT. 70 Fi. `i 0 Bc NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A 6 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES, (p LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ? LOT A 2,246 SF. 40 FT. - 41.2 FT. TOTAL LIVING AREA OF 27,021 SOFT.AND GARAGE OF 4,228 SOFT. S.R.CLARKE LANDSCAPE w ARCHITECTURE&DEVELOPMENT z rc TOTAL b Q N > o m 110 COPPERWOOD WAY WP SHE AREA: 72262 SF. ES 0 z w OCEANSIOE,CA 92058 8 e Legal D rVpton € o Z 0 TEL:(760)716-3100 -- B:DEVELOPMENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK 12,IN THE CITY OF RANCHO off'. 0 w Oo SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK REAR YARD BUILDING HEIGHT CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS 3.B 3 w P1MBUnOx Pux FRONT YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD (REO.15 FT.) (MAX.35 FT.) PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS,PAGE(S)46,RECORDS OF g„ Z c-2 TENIATME TRper uw (REO.37 FT.)(RED.5/10 FT.) SAIDpCOUNTY. 2 p c-s cOucEPTueL R arc wuL Puxc LOT 1 37 FT. 5/10 FT. IS FT. }1g'_6^FT. N®4 m d _ 0-6 PREUlHRO-IT I gwrucE nu+ LOT 2 37 FT 5/0 FT, 15 FT. }30'-3"FT. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING. By 17 cm Flu MAP LOT 3 37 FT. 5/10 FT. 15 FT. }18'-11"FT 2. SEE CIVIL FOR SITE DRAINAGE. =u LOT 4 37 FT. 5/10 FT. IS FT. }20-9"FT. LOT 5 3]FT. 5/10 FT. IS FT. }2g'-3"FT UB &@�ffiA4 i vxrxm MN,maEm WiA SxEEi IxOFx LOT 6 37 FT. 5/10 FT. IS FT. }30'-3"FT. LOT A 37 FT. - - •-XED SHE 01A TRY 1:wax allo ROOFSvui+sK a 5 d F W A-2.01R Lm 2:FLOOR u+0 ROOF PIANO -o+ aQc Q BUILDING TYPE AND GROSS FLOOR AREA: ado G Z LOT NO.OF IST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR TOTAL UVING GARAGE A-201F TOY 6:FLOOR INc ROOF PWlS STORY (SF.) (SF.) AREA(SF.) (SF.) F C) F A-YEA LOT 1:EIf RUS LL A-J O1B LOT 2:E1EvnnONs LOT 1 1 3,452 SF. - 3,452 SF. 667 SF. HAd Z w solo LOT 4 EMVAnOxS LOT 2 2 2,464 SF. 2,235 BE 4,699 SF. 658 SF. '° U O = LOT 3 1 3,463 SF. - 3,463 SF. 763 IF. F) A-AN Lm 6:EIEVA M T�� LOT 4 1 3,463 EF - 3,463 SF 761 SF. Oo LOT 5 2 2,466 SF. 2,227 SF. 4.693 SF. 657 SF. To ,-I PRELNRVR LOT 6 2 2,586 SF. 2,184 SF. 4.770 SF. 659 SF. oho L-3 WARA NSKE AAN P :GR w BUILDING COVERAGE:MAX.PERMISSIBLE 40% (INCL.EAVES>24',BALCONY&LATTICE PATIO COVER) a a LOT =4,119 SF./11,035 SF.=37% HISREr MAP SEAL/$TAMP LOT 2 =3,122 ST./10,752 SF.=29% o g LOT 3 =4,226 SF./14,713 SF.=29% a€. LOT 4 =4224 9:/14,631 SF.=29% u:2 LOT 5 =3,123 SF./ 9,983 SF.=31% LOT 6 =3,245 SF./ 8,745 SF.=37% -,&_ waga LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: �i;Y LOT OVERALL FRONT YARD FRONT YARD HARDSCAPE FRONT YARD DECORATIVE COVERAGE LANDSCAPE(MIN.25%) (MAX.50I HARDSCAPE(MAX.25%) "-' o zoosAR LOT 1 5.391 SF. 49% 49% 2% rR€ D D/LL LOT 2 6,126 SF. 6" SUPERMSED BYTL oB C LOT 3 1,820 SF. 679" 339. - LOT 4 8,819 SR 68% 32% P PERMIT SETK LOT 5 5,516 SF. 61% 35% 4% ��V BIB SET LOT6 4,1816 SF. 53% 42% 5% 5 REVISION CMU PIER,WHERE OCCURS Q ua SPLIT-FACE CMU WALL AND CAP J Q Am RFweRITru x SHEET NO 3E 0 T 2 CMU PENCE WALL ELEVATION SCALE: I/4"=I'-D" OF SHEETS DRC2020-00195 S H E E T Refereme Notes O I-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE II PROPOSED NEW GRADE O 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 12 PROPERTY LINES. Q CONCRETE PAVED DRIVEWAY 17 PROPOSED AC CONDENSER UNIT LOCATION. ®(N)6'HT.CMU(SPLIT PHASE WALL PATH 2'CONCRETE CAP ON TOP),SEE CIVIL PLAN&DETAIL 10 14 (N)7'HT.,CMU(SPLIT PHASE WALL),SEE CIVIL PLAN. �5 (E)CMU WALL TO REMAIN 15 (N)8'HT.,CMU(SPLIT PHASE WALL),SEE CIVIL PLAN. WSW LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ©(N)LANDSCAPE AREA 16 CONCRETE PAVED WALKWAY ARCHITECTURE,CIVIL ENGINEERING&INTERIOR 2336 W.FOOTHILL BLVD.,SD 1,UPLAND CA 91786 �7 (N)INFILTRATION BASIN PHONE:(909)608-7118 FAX:(909f 946-1137 ®SET BACK LINES q _� W �9 (N)FIRE HYDRANT g'o d Z 7 10 PROPOSED SIZE DRAINAGE,SEE CIVIL PLANS. 10 03 LL z _ EXISTING RESIDE0- o¢� Z U APN.0202-%1-20-0000 W NG RESIDENTS ODTING RESIDBUS _? o MN:0202-}42-48-0000 APN:0202---46-0000 ZONE:LR(2-4 OU/AC) - 20NE:IR(2-4 W/AC) PPN:U202-}42-4I-0000 0- 5 ED (O n ZONE IR L2-4 OU/AC) ZONE:LR(2-4 DU/AC) o ¢GO ) U m 4 5 \ 58939'05"W,35001' A -o N J, DO Y U _ - - -- ------- ---- - o x DO < ED DO BACs... .....:. .LOT t5 ..'....... r a -p� .,. A,... ...... - :L.`L ROD.l APN%020 G 5 1-64 0000 .o - 25�-0 E. (2-4 DJ/AC) t ACK d:... 2 _0. OT 1 '•l. -tor LO DEPTH '•'•• 'a --- - ,5 o I5'_D�� - - ..Y. ..... _ ;_�.�is:. .. I6 o N i LU ETBA +__ti__ lil O F 2 2s�_D„ _o„ i, L'J. \ '::i': : g °off �- EXIST G R DE g W z a ' SETBACK r u 1 .V'.' APN.02 -5J1-65-0000 0 ZONE: (2-4 UU/AC) uw :'�+ LOT 2 �a - i --- - rm----- --- _11r.'®............. �—I - --J' --JS�] w xEru sE0./srnuP ...............pEPTH.'.': S h ?• .s............. E%I50 71-6 RRE -0000 Ih�T�'q MN:02 -SJ1-66-0000 dam':• w$I. .... ZONE: (2-4 DJ/AC) LOT 3OB Z ULL 4 ' '''<' LOT 4 m / :: O o ')z c:;a:;:;_;::I r o TL CHECKED By TL PLAN I E%1.1 RESIDENfS A ��'= PERMIT SET LOT A K •:.�:.•:.'. PN.02D 571-67-OD00 = o ZONE:L (2-4 DU/AC) -00 BID SET ':'.' '.E.'.'.'.'. 0_�I _ _ _ f o _ �A '.f.'.'.'.'. 1-3 _ N - —_ - 58939• i' 10 5w� 350-0" BNB SEE REF NOTE I5 mad 0 o� E%ISRNG R610EN15 EXISTING RESIDENTS 91FIING RESIDENTS NE%ISRNG RESIOENR EXISTING RESIOENR - w MN:0202-571-76-0000 MN:0202 - - AP 2-SJ1-J4-W W M:0202-S-4 DJ 0000 APN:0202-571-72-0000 EXISTING RESIDENTS 777L, ZONE:LR(R-4 DU/AC) NE Lfl(2- ZONE:IR(2-4 DJ/AC) ZONE:IR(2-4 DU/AD) APN:E.tR(2-S DU 0000 NORTH EET N0: NNE.�(2_4 DD,AD, ® A 1 .02� 1 Proposed SKe Man SCALE I"=20'-0" 00195 OF SHEETS DRUM S H E E T w WSW LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,OWL ENGINEERING&INTERIOR P335 W.FOOTHUL BLVD.,SHE 1,URAND CA 91786 PHONE:(909)608-7118 FAX:(909f 946-1137 9=� W 'i g Z & n f 03 D, s O i o¢� Z V OTING RE510EN5 0 APN.0202-341-20-0000 E%ISHNG NEEIDENTE 91FING RESIDENTS =P? o MN:0202-542-48-0000 pPN:0202-542-46-ODMO = O y ZONE:LR(2-4 0U/AC) ZONE M(2-4 DU/AC) APN:OM2-343-47-0000 °- W 20NE:IR(2-4 W/AC) ZONE N(2-4 0U/K) o00 ¢N _ N a< Cl, ______ ________ ___ O}O YM - — -- - -- °—4 -- — — --------- Y F, A II LOT6 2'-9.. o i 25 o�1i1 a I E%ISR RESIDENTS APN'.020-571-64-0000 E - - (3-4DU/AC) xoY SETBACK _p" I'' I �C' 0 I § I ^ I SEBpC Iz4'-e° 2 LOT 1 m I 114'-10" m I LOT DEPTH z 1' ---- --- -- --- -__ - ---- --- --------- _ m -- 0 I _ F W w Gq,� -- 1�� •��- -� 15 Q � R CA fn _0 om ,1 ii °off J 25'-0" o �p II EXCH G NESIDEIRS g W z a s SETBACK - - -- II APN:02 -571-65-OD00 ° off' o " II ZONE' (3-4 OU/AC) uw W Ih - I,1 m 17'- LOT 5 \\ LOT 2 Dap m I25'-o" - - T DEPTH , I I I w r _ 1 - -_= Y J= _ +] co', KEv uaP SEaL/STAMP 1____-________o- ______-____N_____________--______ - - - o a 1 _DEPTH DEPTH 1 _: EX10 G RESIDENTS ��_ EIBACK APN:ON-571-66-GERM i w$ O ZONE: (2-4 DU/AC) i oy ii I y pc /Ay Ie'-a' I ao� �. LOT 3 �� I I r o zMA LOT 4 0 n'—s I TL GO 4-' C TL RESIDERSPLAN CH S LOT A 1 APN02571-67-0000 : o PERMIT SETK1 ZONE: (2-4 DU/AC) ° E10 SET 0TEA = Q.m 350'-0' 7- SEE REF NOTE 15 =3S 0 oL OCTRG RESIDERS OTING RESIDERS IXISIING NESIDENR N%GTING—GEN5 E%GANG RESIDERS - w APN'.0202-571-76-0000 APN:0202 - - AP 2-SJ-J4-0000 AP M3M3-571-7J-MMMM AM,0202-57,-72-0000 IXISTNG RESIDERS ZONE:IR(2-4 Du ACJ ZONE LR(2-4 OU/AC) xE.LR 2- ZONE:IR(2-4 DU/AO) ZONE:IR(2-4 DU/AC) APN:0202-571-66-0000 NORTH EET No: ZONE:IR(2-4 W/AC) 1 Proposed SVte Phi/Setback scale r'=zo'_o" A1 .03,T OF SHEETS D RC2020-00195 S H E E T Re4erar-1 - -- Ll F_________________________ WBW LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,CINL ENGINEERING&INTERIOR 23M w FOO7NLL MO.,SlE I,IPI,AND CA 91786 PHONE:(909)608-7118 FA%:(SO9�946-1137 5g gym Ts Z 10 pro CC 1 o= I IRig, R.:a 03 I e�I I dos p e Fff3 gi------------------------ LL- 21R4 Ryan SCALE: I/8"=I'—C" 1,ws r O o ° R H J 06 It 5 O a1 O F u— r MAP =A</=TAMP mnsnR acorsooM a° Ni /1 w __-------` - ® --------- ------- olNlxc -- F p SUPOYMSED B', TL �Yy rcircncry _ Y eB CHECKED BN TL ❑® m PLAN CHECK —/—/—_PERMIT BIO SET _�� REVISION rcEORO�M«, aEORaoM N � NORTH `€€ SHEET NO: �o®®r�I� SCALE I/8 A2.01 A OF SHEETS DRC2020-00195 S H E E T Reference No es IT] WSW LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,CIAL ENWEPING A INTEPIOR M W.FOOTHILL BLVD.,STE 1,UPLAND CA 917M PHONE ISM)608-718 FAX(909 946-1137 0 o om Cc it DO z o 'z ------------------- z s iz 0 z 0 0 3 Rool Plan SCALE: 1/8'-I-0' N 0 -j (L F- j LL LL 0 LL 0 z 0 U) 0 Od Lu Od 17 1, 1'. U) Ti r7p m iH ............................. KEYSEAL/ST11P B -------- (3 lie) ,AT Pis G� ----------- ----- od JOB NO. T— DRAM BY SUPE-SED BY CHEOFED BY! ii Ni 8!11 N L� —N—N S PERMIT SET ii Ni Ni fl:Ni:HN A, ------------- ------------L11 ki ii Ni Ni M M HT. ID SET JJ- Ni Ui L—R— Ni Ni IN 2j5 A -17 NORTH + 111T NO 2 Second Floor Plan SCALE: 1/8'=1-0' 1 First Floor Plan SCALE 1/8'=I'-O" A2.01 B - OF SHEETS DRC2020-00195 E 7 Reference Notes El WBW LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,CIML ENGNEERING&INTERIOR 2335 W FOOTHILL BLVD,STE 1,UPLAND,CA 91786 I PHONE:(909)60-7118 FAX:(90)946-1137 L________________+ PHON Fol pro '0 5 1 0 ------ -------- Z' '0 N Fh , Z X. m o 0 M X� M L-------------------------------—----------------—--- I I-----' -----—----- --- ------------------—---—----------— 2 SCALE: 1/8 1 0 Roof Han Cl) 0 0 Ir 06 Ir 70 0 _j LL 5 1 11—B ININ. a is ----------------—----——--------- 7 r 7 ININ. JOB NO. M BRAM BY; ­.'B. TL 11— IN NI ININ. ­C­By! TL PLAI CIECI P-11 SET im iu iii:M11 i Mi M BIG OFT :1 IH IU V V M 4.Mi M M N _�� REVISION N Mi Mi :U IN Mi Ni iU A 0-2 NORTH SHEET 10: + A2.01 C 9 Hoor Plan SCALE: Reference Notes El - ---------- ------- —------- ------ --------------- W&WI-AIN DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. --------I ARCHITECTURE,CIML ENGINEERING&INTERIOR ------------—-- 2 P335 W FOOTHILL BLVD,STE 1,JftAND,CA 91786 HONE:(909)60-7118 FAX:(90)946-1137 0 5 L------- -------- --------------- ----------------- C,11 . . Z MO --------------------------------------------—--------j ------------------------------- L-------------------—-------------------------- 1 ----------------------------- z y J gs LL 0 21 Roof Han SCALE: 1/8"—1'-0" wo 0 0 CC _j Oa 4il E m 0 LL_j II A -RIP -------- -------- ---------- L-6 M NO. ORA..1; TUAz TL Y! TL PLAI CIECI ­1411 SET H 00 ----------- R GO SET fli 11 V V N _� REVISION -------------------------- --- --------------------------- IN 2­ 1— ­2' NORTH + SHEET 10: - A2.01 D 9 Hoor Ian SCALE: 1/8.�l 7-1 �F SHEETS Reference N-f.=:� -------------------------------------------------------------------------- El ----------------------- W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARI E.WE ENGINEERING k INTERIM P335 W.FOOTHILL BLVD.,STE 1,UPLAND CA 91786 HONE:(909)608-7118 FAK(9091946-1137 0. 1 10 < z z CIS 0 Z' Z Cc) S----------------------------- < z LL Rig o ----------------- Cc agg LL o z 00 < 3 Roof plan SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0 m 0 LL-j EL -i LL 0 LL- 0 z 0 0 0 CC C) Cc FL Lu .6 ---------- -DI ---------- I ------------------- W 7 DID III N RR EPA. RUPERMSED PLAN CHECK PERMIT SET REVISION 4S -T I 0CIEEPIKED.1 II ........ -------- Ng RI + NO, - A2.01 E 2 Second Fbor Han SCALE: 1/8"=I'-O" 1 First Floor Man SCALE- 1/8'=1-011 OF SHEETS S DRC2020-00195 , H RE BE T Relerence Notes o \1� i—, ------------------------ W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,COAL ENNNEENING&INTERIM 2335 W.FOOTHILL BLVD.,SR I,UPLAND CA 91786 PHONE:(909)B139-AI8 FAk(9)9)946-1137 r g=� 1 m3 pay < M _ o 08 N F o= 1 f 1 gpo w wo ,�.., ZLL LL , wL� H w W ' I 'o 0 w ----------------------------------—-- ---- �B3 �m ey F� a in O z d Roof Y Plan SCALE: I/8"=1'-0" ' CD Q O a ww J LL ° OFz0 � o O g Lu OC LL V- •-iiOa' .3�er r ze'-o- ° �om k I owi.o Roots LiIN.— oLL� NEr Nna scAL/sTnua IIII IIII I'11-IT HIT HIT - o& nusrEr+eeoaoam III Illi III HIT HIT III I SH TO III III III e�sxres. ;•! I HIT HIT III III III HIT &E a g ; ° 0 - s . gym °W. _ o° n I CNECRED —�--�— PERMIT SET _ a aID SET .. o . ., ' euconv ,q, en•H / eeoaooxxiATK® e[oaooNu lncnmE arv°v aoou sEorz°om xv --- �s Q a is'-i°' is'-r iz'-io' is'-0 •I NORTH y€EET �`'Lu'l? ® A2.01 F 2 Second RI lean SCALE: I/8"=I'-0' 1 First Roor Plan SCALE I/8" -W OF SHEETS DRC2020-00195 S H E E T Reference[Notes Q EAGLE ROOFING,STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:BEL AIR, COLOR:4697 SLATE RANGE Q JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARM:,L 5" COLOR:SHERWIN WILLIAMS-SW6424 TANSY GREEN ❑3 JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 8" --- - -- ---- — -- - —— - --- COLOR:SHERWIN WILLIAMS-SW6424 TANSY GREEN W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,CML ENGNEERINC&INTERIOR ®JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE SHINGLE SIDING, STAGGERED EDGE PANEL 2335 W FOOTHILL NL19.,SIE 1,INLAND,CA 9178E —_—__--_—__ — COLOR:SHERWIN WILLIAMS-SW6686 LEMON CHIFFON PHONE:(909)808-7118 FAX:(909)948-1137 ❑5 STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH gF <N t LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL WIN WILLIAMS- g= Z COLOR:SHERWIN SW6686 LEMON CHIFFON p3b�3o N ©36"HT.WOOD RAILING W/PAINT FINISH COLOR:SHERWIN MLLIAMS-SW7005 PURE WHITE O [� x ❑7 ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL 5il Z U West C JELD-WEN-IWP-WOOD EXTERIOR DOOR E:� 0 4 ®tlest Elevation SCALE: 383 GLASS PANEL U COLOR.WALNUT,GLASS:CLEAR H W o= ®STANDARD SLIDING PAPO DOOR OR EQUAL a Z= MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITO SERIES ° OU J i o¢ COLOR:WHITE t ''= o 3� w zm❑9 HALF-VENT HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL °' Z u- MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES W r COLOR:WHITE y Ro 10 SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL MILGARD:TOPS ANY&MONTECITY SERIES „ COLOR:WHITE t t t t II CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIESN COLOR:WHITE tl - - ---- --- 12 STONE F CORONADO STONE:RIVER ROCK y`-6a D Cn z COLOR:REND BLEND .wo r O LLI O 3 East Elevation SCALE: /8"=I'-0" 13 DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL JELD-WEN-IWP 389 GLASS PANEL e O = Q 14 GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL o J Q J CLOPAC CANYON RIDGE CARRIAGE HOUSE, 'K N. O W w SERIES I,DESIGN 12, s:8 Z WINDOW:RED I3 GLASS:SEEDED,COLOR:WALNUT FINISH C p= - r.o. WOOD CARBELS,FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM, =p WOOD COLUMN W/PAINT FINISHG. i COLOR:SHERWIN WILLIAM-SW7005 PURE WHITE $p Nn�- --- Z EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL w W K v uaP sEu/stoup HINKLEY,TUCKER,SMALL WALL MOUNT LANTERN,F11 �° t t t SKU: 1960 MB,FINISH:BLACK,HT: 11.5" V. _ _ 17 TRELLIS E W/PAINT FINISH COLOR:SHERWIN WILLIAMS-SW7005 PURE WHITE e ? wwg M Q JOB NO. 2 South Elevation SCALE: I 8"/ =I'-0" DRAWNp°€ SUPERHSED DTTL wCHECKED NT: TL PLAN CKECK o P --/—/ _ SET BIG XET _�� REVISION a'o� 0 zrvo v[aeuiTru —___ —___ —___——___—_ _ __.—_—___—_ __.—___ ___.—__---- ; 0 _—————- _——-- — - _———_— N0: North Elevation SCALE: I/8=I'-D" A3.01 A OF SHEETS DRC2020-00195 S H E E T Reference Notes o �I EAGLE ROOFING,STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:CAPISTRANO, COLOR:3645 SUNRISE BLEND T.o.Mo _ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ ❑z STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAI COLOR:820 SILVERADO,BASE 200 xIr+ - -- - - - -- WBW LAND,CIAL E LONSII G&INT MOO O STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH PR(HIIECNNE,CIWL ENgNEBiING k INTFPogt _ LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL 2335 W.FOOTHILL BLVD,STE I,UPLAND CA 91766 1 , 1 1 COLOR:63149 HATTERAS,BASE 100 PHONE:(9)9)608-7116 FAX(909)946-1137 R 5$Ya zoo" - - -- ---- --- ®STANDARD SLIDING PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL w`5 W 11 MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITO SERIES COLOR:WHITE 0 0 HALF-VENT HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL w MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES ^ ¢ O w w c LL A __________ COLOR:WHITE £a a O O__ ©SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL '£` p O MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES S F- SCALE: 8"=1'-0 � �e$f I�IeV�fl®P� / U N _ COLOR:WHITE o R n > �7 CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL � ° N 5 z w O MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES 2 2 < <d m o TO,aloes- Ri- - --- ----- ---- __ ______ COLOR:WHITE �$ O> > ¢ U� w$ "'O aW 3 r ®ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL W 4 O FELLA,2 PANEL CONTINUOUS SPRINGUNE 2 LL e U LL=O PREMIUM WOOD ENTRY DOOR COLOR:CHAPPO U -1i h h h �9 DOOR OR MATCH EQUALg ¢ V R - JELD-WEN 3p FIBERGLASS EXTERIOR DOOR €o£ Z, 8FT-FWSH 6w h \ h 1 10 GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL h �m - 4 CLOPAY,CANYON RIDGE CARRIAGE HOUSE h eo SERIES I,DESIGN II = WINDOW:REC II,GLASS:SEEDED, g COLOR:WALNUT FINISH °^ 0 W O ep East II�� pp N C' d I)=$�LL LSO��`h U�®� SCALE: 1/8"-1'-0' II WOOD CARRELS,FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM, £9 u) p WOOD COLUMN W/PAINT FINISH k' Q TYRSHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT, of £'ad O COLOR:SW2808 ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN __w Q J 3 II z s z z a s z Ia Ix I5 oq„ e� W T.o.Rmcs$_ --__ _ _ 12 EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL t ,5 O W HINKLEY,MANOR HOUSEu0y Z SKU: I419BK,FINISH:BLACK,HT: I8 _ « 'ry wwB x oci$_ 8i r - --- - - - ------ TRELLIS E W/PAI NT INT FINISH s ow SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT, q 1 1 1 COLOR:SW2808 ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN Rai NEY MAP SEAL/STAMP n b Va 14 36'HT.METAL RAIIJNG W/PAINT FINISH .� ---- ---- --- - ---- - - - -- SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT, qg COLOR:SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT g€7 H _ 1 1 i 1 -1i 4 IS COLUMN BY VETO o58 1 1 FRP TUSCAN TAPERED ROUND OR MATCH TO EQUAL =a p pply,I� B � OB NO. 2 South Bevatonl SCALE: L/8'-I'-O' 08 J TI «� o vls[o'Y s TO LL TOP CLAN CHE.i.o.P.,+- _W PERMIT SET ___ _____ o'w p� BID SET ad o REVISION £�� Q axo ttsuaurtu« un[Is,xozo T.o. _ _ xI-0 A y 1 + h ® ghNow—I 0 q Q 1 Y.. 'I h + N 1 1 h ` 1 SHEET No. - ------- -------- -- --------------- 9 North ElevOon SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0" A3.01 B — SHEETS DRC2020-00195 s E E T Reference Motes O EAGLE ROOFING,STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:BEL AIR, COLOR:4697 SLATE RANGE O JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 5" SHERWIN WWAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW9160 ARMADILLO O JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 8" ie� - SHERWIN WWAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW9160 ARMADILLO WBWLAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. ARCHITECTURE,CML ENGNEERINO&INTERIOR ®JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE SHINGLE SIDING, 2335 W FOOTHILL BLN1,STE 1,LPLAN9,CA 91786 STAGGERED EDGE PANEL PHONE:(909)608-7118 FAX:(909)946-1137 T.ii9°o(�. „ SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW9160 ARMADILLO �5 STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH y F= W LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL SHERWIN WWAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW7040 SMOKEHOUSE10 p3L�3o iA ©JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE SHINGLE SIDING, .Fo STAGGERED EDGE PANEL W SHERWIN WWAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW7040 SMOKEHOUSE j i �7 ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL �`@" _O 4 East Elevaflo O SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" JELD-WEN-IWP-WOOD EXTERIOR DOOR 5Ba �] 383 GLASS PANEL g g ¢ G COLOR:WALNUT,GLASS:CLEAR 8 z g LL O as J � U ©STANDARD SLIDING PATIO DOOR OR EQUALS 1} MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITO SERIES .o ? i COLOR:BRONZE $ N i p aU Eia,o - ----— �9 HALF-VENT HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL ��, MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES R q COLOR:BRONZE < ii � 10 SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTEC17Y SERIES 4Yg3 - COLOR:BRONZE 11 CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL NS MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES agtl COLOR:BRONZE 114 F I2 STONE gi U) Z CORONADO STONE:RIVER ROCK .wo W O 3 West Bevatbn SCALE: 1/8—C-O'� COLOR:RENO BLEND .E coF (n 3: Q 13 JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 5" HN o _ SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW9160 ARMADILLO �� J (n w 14 GARAGE ODOR OR MATCH EQUAL O W ILL!GLOPAY,CANYON RIDGE CARRIAGE HOUSE, `s I z SERIES 1,DESIGN 12. k 3 WINDOW:REC 13 po' GLASS:SEEDED,COLOR:WALNUT FNIS 22. H Ga w 15 WOOD CARBELS,FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM, $po WOOD COLUMN W/PAINT FINISH >o u 0 SHERWIN WILLIAM PAINT, no K v MaP sEu/sraMP _ COLOR:SW2846 ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN :€o EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL 6.2 HINKLEY,TUCKER,SMALL WALL MOUNT LANTERN, a ? i7T - SKU: 1960 MB,FINISH:BLACK,HT: 11.5' wwg 17 TRELLIS E W/PAINT FINISH SHERWIN LL COLOR+ IAM PAINT, i7 Noe NO. ���vffi� i SCALE: I/8"=1'-0"Sodh COLOR:SW2846 ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN p�€ DRAWN BY: TI/n SOPERHSED BTTL wCBECKED BT: TL c uPAN CKECK PPRMIl —/SPT BID SSET _�� REVISION ---" ------- ---- -- 1 1 W o Q SHEET NO: q Np1®PtLL e 1 North II�V�6E®atV®n SCALE: A3.01 C OF SHEETS S H E E T Reference Notes Q EAGLE ROOFING,STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:CAPISTRANO, COLOR:3636 PIEDMONT BLEND �2 STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL COLOR:81 OATMEAL,BASE 200 W&WIAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. 2 ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL ARCHITECTURE,CML ENGINEERING&INTERIOR SIMPSON DOOR COMPANY,37503 THERMAL SASH(SDL) 23 W FDDIHILL BD9,STE 1,UPLAND,CA 91786 PHONE:(909)608-7118 FAX:(909)946-1137 ®STANDARD SLIDING PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL m TB Iroory;, MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITO SERIES s , ® s COLOR:WHITEF„ Ii z �5 HALF-VENT HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL pg 0 MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES .F° �y COLOR:WHITE =.3 y U IN MIT W ©SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL N i I�,�,,�,ry&Cp,„, MILGARD:TUB ANY&MONTECITY SERIES _ 0 i 4 East Bevation SCALE: I/8"=I'-O" COLOR:WHITE 5: J �7 CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL g g ¢ C MILGARD:TUB ANY&MONTECITY SERIES 8 lai Z' ¢o COLOR:WHITEEF a J E ®COLUMN FINIS TIT TF IF IF IF IF IF H Cf LA HASP A STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL z°� N o+ s COLOR:81 OATMEAL,BASE 200T. $� s 10i0 "—"—" 0 DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL �€� ~4 SIMPSON DOOR COMPANY,37503 THERMAL SASH(SDL) Ro m 10 GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL '-�^ WAYNE DALTON GARAGE DOOR, R MODELS 44,TI-11 PLYWOOD m „ ffi ffi COLOR:WALNUT IN WOOD CARBELS,FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM, tl _ IF WOOD COLUMN W/PAINT FINISH (n ERW1N WILLIAM PAINT,COLOR:SW7008 ALABASTER $gs � Z s� West 12 EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL Eo O w 0 05 R INWest Elevation SCALE: 1/8"-1'-0" HINKLEY,ALFORD PLACE,LARGE WALL MOUNT LANTERN SKU:2565 O 3 ; 13 TRELDS W/PAINT FINISH W N u) Lu SHERWIN WILLIAM PAINT, w Q W LL COLOR:SW2807 ROCKWOOD MEDIUM BROWNITT El TIT ELI TF ITT E s:W Z k8: p` p-q "—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ _— £3"'" u v uaP scu/stoup R F W ¢€Y 2 South Elevator SCALE: I/8"-1'-0" p'E o uaz : SUPFRHSED BTTL wCHECKED BY: TL aN CKECK o P-11 --/—/ _ SET BIG SET _�� REVISION so-a �Bc 0 / Eni SIE 'l SHEET NO: q pp 1� I� Y North 1 Bevyp ion SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" A3.01 D OF SHEETS S H E E T Reference Motes Q EAGLE ROOFING.STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:BEL AIR, COLOR:ROOFING. SIERRA MADRE ❑2 JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 5" SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW7040 SMOKEHOUSE \41 ❑3 JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE PLANK,LAP SIDING,CEDARMILL 8" COLOR:RICH ESPRESSO WBWLAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. -4zo-Door ®JAMESHARDIE,HARDIE SHINGLE SIDING, ARCHITECTURE,QML ENGINEERING&INTERIOR STAGGERED EDGE PANEL 2335 W.FOOTHILL BLVD,SIE 1,UHAND CA 91796 _ COLOR:MONTEREY TAUPE PHONE:(909)606-7118 FAX(909)946-1137 I �5 STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH wfi W HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL Z =®rSHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT,COLOR:SW6187 ROSEMARY a3 N a "FEN. M. = ©36"HT.WOOD RAILING W/PAINT FINISH a£sNUP ♦ o . COLOR:SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT oN'H u S. West�5 �7 ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL a'6 ZO 4 West Bevation SCALE: I/8"=1'-0" JELD-WEN-IWP-WOOD EXTERIOR DOOR °�® pm o 383 GLASS PANELa W COLOR:WALNUT,GLASS:CLEAR o Q N a N= ®STANDARD SLIDING PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL € O 2 a a MILGAR TUSCANY D:TUS &MONTECITO SERIES GO OR BRONZE __ C �¢o ?r. � � i 9 HALF-VENT Z HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL 'L"a o MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES 1 COLOR:BRONZE A 1 + 10 SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL < MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES - Ao COLOR:BRONZE < ir II CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL Gm MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES ! / COLOR:BRONZE B8o = STONE g F U) CORONADO STONE:RIVER ROCK -�,"om � U) Z c� F� FF�� p COLOR:DESERT RUST azs LO O �W LD NJ East LS Devafion SCALE: 1/8"=I'-O" d9 F Dn > Q 13 DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL £dY JELDD WEN-WE 389 GLASS PANEL gN O = F w F U) uJ 14 GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL o„W Q J CLOPAY,CANYON RIDGE CARRIAGE HOUSE, " Q W W --- --- --- ----- -$i'o'aose SERIES I,DESIGN 12, im Z _ WINDOW:REC 13 N': 775 Ep GLASS:SEEDED,COLOR:WALNUT FINISH pN� $ - -Diu-off IS WOOD CARPELS,FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM, WOOD COLUMN W/PAINT FINISH W SHERWIN WILLIAM PAINT: ' N COLOR:SW2846 ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN �w K v uaP sEAL/sraMP --- - -4l Ifi EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL 8€0 HINKLEY,TUCKER,SMALL WALL MOUNT LANTERN, 1 SKU: 1960 MB,FINISH:BLACK,HU 11.5" gb 17 TRELLIS E W/PAINT FINISH H,� SHERWIN WILLIAM PAINT: COLOR:SW2846 ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN "W 6 Sol'!h LS Devatbn SCALE: 1/8"=I'-O' JOB NO, n€ D TULL sY WIPERMSED TL ITEIKEI PLAN CHECK —/_✓—_ �� B. PERMIT ------ --r----------- .a. _ �$ Bi0 � REVISION -- ---- 4r.o_oov `3 ® $0 0 EET H0: --- _ A3.01 E 1 North Bevation SCALE: I/8"=1'-0" DRC2020 00195 OF SHEETS S H E E T Reference Notes �I EAGLE ROOFING,STANDARD SELECT,STYLE:CAPISTRANO, z s Iz a a is x s ii m COLOR:3125 TERRACOTTA O STUCCO W/PAINT FINISH LA HABRA STUCCO:SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR EQUAL COLOR:97 PACIFIC SAND,BASE 200 WSW LAND DESIGN GNEERN &INT INC. ❑3 COLUMN BY VETO ARCHITECTURE,CINL ENgNEEAING k INIDWOR ERR TUSCAN TAPERED ROUND OR MATCH TO EQUAL 2335 W.FOOTHIL BLWI..STE I,UPIANO CA 91786 A 4 NNE(909)608-7118 FAX(909)946-1131 R ®STANDARD SLIDING PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL m MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITO SERIES 5€ UM II'o$-�- COLOR:WHITETn ss Z z i �5 HALF-VENT HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW OR EQUAL DO 0 MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES � � co COLOR:WHITE o < J ©SINGLE HUNG WINDOW OR EQUAL MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES FU O 4 West Bevan SCALE: 1/8—C-O" COLOR:WHITE U o V) �7 CASEMENT WINDOW OR EQUAL ¢ r MILGARD:TUSCANY&MONTECITY SERIES -8 m COLOR:WHITE o ZO= <¢ T.o.RmrsO- ------ - - - - - - o ®ENTRY DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL Y O J w Yo 3 PELLA,2 PANEL CONTINUOUS SPRINGLINE "2; W< 19 PREMIUM WOOD ENTRY DOOR 2 LIE zi 0o�- - -- - - - -- - COLOR:CHAPPO �G o DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL F„E < a _ JELD-WEN °$ FIBERGLASS EXTERIOR DOOR b ziT _ _ _ __ ____ ___ 8FT-FLUSH .o. o� O O 10 GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUALW CLOPAY,CANYON RIDGE CARRIAGE HOUSE p SERIES I,DESIGN II =+9 WINDOW:REC II,GLASS:SEEDED, F a J) �� - - - ---------- COLOR:WALNUT FINISH � N z ai$i m co 0 w 0 3 East Bevation SCALE: I/8"=1'-0" Ell FASCIA BOARD,WINDOW&DOOR TRIM W/PAIN FINISH U) 3 Q SHERWN WLLIAM PAINT. 0 GQLOR:SW7596 ONLY NATURAL WW F U) ___________ _____ e , 12 EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT OR MATCH EQUAL u,g 0 W W HINKLEY,MANOR HOUSE "-g z SKU: 14I9BK,FINISH:BLACK,HT: IB" 8 TRELLIS E W/PAINT FINISH 1.2 F SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT, "oz w COLOR:SW6090 JAVA is + 1 S�: Eal/sTalnP R 14 36"HT.METAL RAILING W/PAINT FINIS r MaR s„ Ir�o$_ _ _ _-------- -- ___________ ____ __ __ SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT. „§ COLOR:SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT :€e - El , i os� : Y „ JOE 2 South Bevatoon SCALE: 1/8"-I-0° DRAWN BY: TU SUGERWSED BY: 09 CHECKED BY: TL T.o.Nm+ _ ' i 'LAN CHECN —/—/ 'g-_�H PERMIT SET —/—/ SO SET —/ oho REVISION 0°2�$- - --- - - j N - -- --- 3 i a an II-o Q9w Q 1! 1 4 1 + ` FIT ti i / SHEET NO: — — Nort h '� A3.01 F q 0 NortIII Elevation SCALE: 1/8"-1•_o OF SHEETS DRC2O20-00195 S H E E T Reference Notes EVZLE Rom STAMOA SELECT,sriE.au COLOR:4697 ELATE RANGE. aN, L dAwEL 1WVL_HMFIIE PLANK LAP WINO,OEDARMLL N- COLOR:DfJ W WNWAMS-SW5424 TANSY CREDO 0 JALESMAFIIRE,ROWE PLANK,LAP SONGG OEDARMLL Jr - - - - - - - - - -- CupR:9CRN111 WLl1ALC SMBH2E TANSY SAEEH WAMLAa DI'BSN0 MiL E MaW p { Q JAYEENAME,MWOIE SOW SAUM.. 11A11EClllF.OwOMiFIgG 3 YHIOA STAGFkRED EDLE PALIEL 2J8/ UM.SR L CA Ril �?•-}.,.1., COLOR:SERVA4*WAM5-SNUBS LEMON dRFFOW NM€E i�A# Mal 7Q STTICCO M/PAINT FlNIM p L E �I LA MAI'RR STUCCO:SWO FLOAT 20/30 ON EOWA d y COLOR:PERNW MWAMS SMBSW LEMON CHlFFOM E7 N ©SA"HT,NOW RALP10 YI/PALIT FReSH o 5� 00.0R:SWRWW RIWAMS-SWNUS PLRE 4Mr 0 EIITRY DOOR OR MATCH EWAL $ g 4 West EWmlian 93r�ELLK y7 FLiTMON Dar SCALE: L/8•.1'-D" COLOR:W/WNIT,trA55:REAR ¢!}( �R STANDARD SIAMIC PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL }Eg Sa3 $$$ MLOLNP TUSCANY*MONTECITO SEERU °A CD.OR•*ME wS Q HA1•F-VENT NOR12lYHTAL SiIOMP 51`OO'k OR ECLIAI WLMWD.105CANY A WNICI1Y WhEs RgS COLOR:M{TE 10 9NDLE LMIL WHOO'E CR EOW4 $g to MLGAM TOSCAHY @ VCWTIVTV S RIES EE COLOR:XwTE 9p L / 0 CASEMENT W OR EHUAL 9 - 'T MDO'M` 11 11�CAfRF."SCANY 3 MONICIly SERIES 1 COLOR:WE 12 STONE F F N CORONADO 54K-"YEN ROCK � U] Z COLOR:RENO BLEND i r ❑ W Q SCALP I/8-.I-0' 13 DOOR OR✓AXM EOM 3 Easf Elevaria� ❑ H N H 910-VEH-FAP]A4 dA55 PANEL pp p = 4 GARAOF DOOR OR MAFCH EWAL CLOPAY,CAfTON LADCE CARWOE Nd15E, ❑ W SERES I,DE46h 12. Z W OM YNNO REC IS A CLASS SEEDED.Cant WALNUF"059 6ppe} -_- - I5 WOOD EMULS FASOA ROAAD.W1100W t DOW DAM. `9 LY WmCOLUMN W/i'AWT Fm9+ � TH MRt SHEPLW MLLUAM-S&MM PURE MATE �p EXTE810R WALL LLOHI OR MATCH E911AL � eE,Rw ss ds n IUHKLLY-TMER,SMALL WALL MOIIMT LANTERN, 6 BBN 5MIR 19R6 Ma,:�F BLACK,MT.e[.S- II I'F�F-[{� I �f•rf el [7 T E W/iAMi FMZ1 § COLOR;SNERMN 1XWAM5-S'N7D0.5 PORE MMiF: G South Elevaibn SCALE' 1/8'.I'-0" Tlm p r,.lRRrsc rtr n 6 ypP� ncaiP nr n _ AY 9E*g -I�— '�.` ��� RrcVIS10 LV �ap ®se was ML IF ru► G E'- SCA E I/8.I'-0" A3.O 1 A 4'.ation DRC2020-00195 SHEETS E — T Refererx a Notes Q EAGLE RppFWG, IRISESTmDARD SELECT.SrnE:C1P6TRAN0. ar� ,�SIIRRIEE LFHO 0 STUCCO WI PAINT M05H LOT LA RWBRA SINLYSF SAO FLOAT 10I50 OR E.0141 COLOR:QO%VERAOO.BASE 2% 1i'•a'� _ -- - �3 STUCCO WI PAINT FINISH ATrNyLIEIILUO91f,OA 9L1p9 NS1OLT k NUo. A I ` LA KWA SAPCM SAND FLOAT 70/M CFI EOWA TAi%iGp94 RNY.SIE L IRA CA COLOR:63I49 HATTERAS.BASE IW LLAm��1 EOFT6 FAc(98p w.. ..:b.-1 ❑A STAADAiD SWING PAID DOOR OR EOUAL i COL TUSr#MprTEpin SERIES E COLOR:OR:gl: CAAN WHITE � t� HAIF-SEMf HORIZONTAL SLUNG XINOpR OR EQUAL IELDARD:TUSCANY k MORTEOTr 5Efd5 Q iR DOLOR:TMITE Y Wo J Clsviad__ _ SCALE. I/ -I-0 ®5N0.ER C:TU "T&YOR NTEj CIT SEAS DOLOR WW11 jaa� o Q CASEMENT MNDOW OR EWAL WLCARD:TUSGWY k MORIECITY WKS gY S c OOI.OR:%}tlTE ; W ®ENTRY DOW OR MATCH EQUAL LL Yi4 iN1LL O PANEL CONTINUOUS SPF M E a PREYUM HOOD ENTRY DOOR 6 DOLOR:CHAPPO £g a DOOR OF MATCH ECUAL � .ELD-WEIN iU*R0.ASS EITERIOR DOOR iL n• --T )AFT-FLUV ID GARACE DOMR OR MATW EQUAL VLOPAV,CANYON RIDES CARRIAGE HOUSE SEM I.DESIGN 11 1€ F WINDOW REC II,GLAi5:SEECED, 1 DOLOR:WALNUT FINISH ell ll � CIy .% _may II.�.,�.� y,_,� N Q w d J �b74 ERYa11Li11 CALL .!ti-L-ti %YICO CA1BEl5,FASpA BOARD,MXD011 k ODOR IIAM, F,,, 2 R W WOW OWAR WI PANT FINiSH Q SHOWN*WAYS PAWXT, O F F - COLOR,SW7808 ROpINAOW DARN gRowN Q LLIJ 17 i E%1ER10R WALL LIGHI Wip1 EQUAL z w w wouy.MANOR HMM y SIN'14POM,TIMSH:%KK NF 19' . - 13 TRELLIS E W/PANT FINISHM1 - SHMMN WILLIAMS PAINT, mom le y'MT.METAL RING W/PAINT PNISH W -_ -_-_ ____ ___ _ ____ _ __ - SHEFW UWAYS PANT, COIOFL SWS993 MACK OP MONT $E� t + f Is cRAN 9r 00 1' RIP TUSCAN TAPERED ROUND OR MATCH TO EQUAL y � Mg � 2 5v11th Elevation SCALE: IIM"=r g aNe.wtP Er n 699� acaeP iw. TL a awl P � + � - � W Airg _IJ— i LiEV11816l41 m ---------- - ----------- -- - - _ -- A3.01 B iJarth elevation SCALE: 1/O"-1•__ ORC2O2O-N195 of SHEETS 9 H E E T Reference Noes Q EACIE 4637 R STANDARD SElECi,SIYIE BEL Ail, CR:A6ei OOL SLATE P...._ Lr ®JAI[514AIM.HAFM RANK.lW SIBM C[R/Algl S" 511EA11N NIHUAAI$PANE,MDR:SWO160 ARYWILLO 3�JAW9HARDC HARDIE PLANK,LAP W&C,CEDANMU 8" SHEFINX ft"S PAWI.G0.0ft.309160 ARWdLIA �RIK-OwFoo T�� AAA=CROD E.HAPRE SHIX(aE ApHG. U% rpin LL R*.SIF 1, G 9I RE _ SIALGERE6 FAGS PAWLF[IE Vf�AY �A@ 99 SNFRWJ WLLUMS PANT,MOR;S"IW AR11ADILLO 0 STU=W/FIMT FINISH LA HABRA STUCCO SANG BOAT Z0/30 OR EOIIAL SHER1iN 1NUMS PANT,COLOR:•SW7060 SMOKEHOUSE as ©&AICSNAKW.HAFM"BE SLAW. y STA15l EDGE PANEL $10WN'AWILIS PAINT.COLOR:SA70A0 SAOKDKOEE 4 East Elevation SCALE: 1/11'--O" ❑]81 GLASS PANEL O ExiERCR DOOR z COLOR:MUM?.FLAGS PEAR 0 STANDARD%DMG PATIO DOOR OR EQUAL R Lry w MILGAREE TIISCAHY&MONTWTO SERIES COLORr BRONZE y eS x 9n HALF-WENT HGiZONTAL SUNG WMODW OR=t ggg MLCAPO TUSCANY&UNTECITV SERIES R COLCR�RRUNZE H SINGLE MLNC*MOW OR MW p MLGARO TDSCAHY&IIEIiiEpTY AHIR [eg —_ GOLOR:BRONZE t� 11 CA%WM W WroWW OR EQUAL y .. MICARO rUSGANY A,MDNTECITY SERIF. = color:BRAHIE I F r- Crj ` I2 STORE ill Vqi 1 , Z CORtlHAM SRAM:RIVER ROCB L m ❑ W Q 3 West Elevation scuE: 1/8"=I'-D" cAIDR RErmaErD � � 1S AAIESINAIAM.HARDE PLANK,LAP SWIG.CIDEMWL 5' e 0 : Q SMEAHBI WUJAMS PANT,DOLOR:SAISD ARYMI-1.0 J > 1!GARAGE MOR OR MATCH MMIL p FJ w W CLWAY,,COFYM RW CARmAGE NW , � Z SE SERIES I,DESIGN IZ a$ WNOOK REC I] Ea- 4, , i- GLASR m an,MDR WALNUT FWS, . i ¢ Q WDM CARPELS.FASCIA DOM,WNOOW a DOCK TR4, A y NOcO COLUMN W/PAINT EHSH !p SAERm WLJAM PAINT. p[ kEr•AP !S*u� 1 d COLOR;S*X*RA'YMV BRONZE GREEN 6E iyN - 16 f;lmck WALL L*ir OR MA=i EQUAL HNKLEY,TUCKER,SMALL 1FA1L MWNT LANTERN, S ip 91u:1960 M8,EN151F BLACK,Hr: ITS" 1?TRELLIS E W/PAINT FMSH 96AWT1 WEIJAY PAIHi, DOLOR'SR28i8 RA1'F710FT BRONZE COHN d•a SouthElevationSCALE'. f/8'=I'-0" � vuw.an Tj.pL wu.rnEP rt. n IbxxY� •Jy oe«m nr n � TAr � 21 � - y FiEVIS10N 1 North EIaVBtlan SCALE ya•.I-o- A3.01 C s1 mc Ts F E T Reference Plates ❑T EAGLE R3OR4G WRO SELECT,STYLE,CMSIRANO, coEDR:3sw aaEDMONTCWT BLEND 0 mcCa W/>AINi FN15H LA HABRA SR1000!SAND FLOAT 20/30 OR PAuu pLOk BI OATMEAL t)ASE ZOO - - .- - - - ❑D E"T DOOR OR MAiC/1 EQUAL 01 owulu�ow F1"mK a alum 4 l SIMPSON DOCK COMPANY.37W3 I IE]WAL SASH(W Lsf6r rmTIRL EW.5E 1. CA R1 mRE ao-nu r�r swan ©STANDARD sLSNHG PAra BOOM OR EOi7A1 *m MAFiAA6: EOSCANY A µQH EpTO SEA R COLOR-*LATE r QS HALF-%W HORIZONTAL RA WG'WINDOW OR EDBAE - e MSGARQ TUSCANY a MOINTECITY SMS 5 CROR:Vwq o fl �D SWOtE HLKIR NMcOW OR EWAL- � 9i g East t Mat OLOR. lOSCANY k MOpIIEpTI''�EAIES C � 9 z C COLOR.WAX �Y SCALE' I/S'-I'-p" - j ©7 Ni WNDOW OR EQUAL MILCM S a MlWRO 1ElSCANY k i1dMEGTY SERIES $p BBBB COLOR:*d TE W 4 ❑B COLUMN RNISH � g' LA HAeRA STUCCO;SAND FLOAT 70/30 OR EQUAL S aj i CELOR'al OATMEAL,BASE 200 m Q DOOR OR MATCH MAIL pQ SMPSON DOOR OLMPANY,3750.7❑%AL SASH(SOL) `RS I]GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL E � p WRY11E OALTCN GARAGE BOIN. R _ MODELS N,TI-II PLYWOOD - � caae;wwar NOW CAROELS,FASCIA BOARD.WIDOW ae DOOR TFm, $$yy = NOW COL(WH W/FAINT ndSH �d3 F h N .9RRNN WLIJAM PAW7.LQOR!SW7008"ASTER �B� =1 N Z 3 West Elevation SCALE: I/9=I'-D' [ r2 E W&UY, WOW WALL U PtgX.LAt�WkLi MOUNT JRNTRm N SNlS 2595 $ d = 43 TRELUS W/PAW)FM95 qq [n LL SUM"INLUAM PAINT. 5" D W W maz 51 M7 ROONAWD MTONRA mom ��- Z 2 South Elevation SCALE: IX-I'-0, „ SEi wes.kxa rtr n 36••@PE o«� n �=— . 1 � an urn mIla- z31ON wi $ oilg NoM Elevation SCALE I/8-_I�_O" A3.01 D SHEETS E T Reference NoW ❑F COLOR ROOFING.STANDARD SELECT.5111E BEL AR C0.0R:4563 A WXNIE 0 JALIESNARM.WMWE PLANK,LIP SIMB,CEPARW1 5" SKAWN WILUkM$PAINT,COLOR:SW70IW°$IDK0Iba Q JALEWARDIE,HAIM PLANK.LAP 9pp1{'CEDANWL Z- COLOR.RICO ESPRESSO MdW LA190EM EONRILTWTFS MC. AR7FOCYR.DLt B[rtERxc RRAua o AWS,ARM NNIdE snluF SIDING, �,.F�fLL AID.�L �mEE - _ $1AODERED EDOE PA EL NOIC Ir ibTRe FAR 941ar 1-;1 COLOR:YdTETV TAUPE gg u STUCCO W/PART RINISN3 j LA NAg l SIUCCD.i WI FLDAF 70170 OR FWAI [9 1 1 S IMEN WKUMS PAINT,COLOR;S'A51B7 ROSEYIRY �EFiE� ? 11 ]6 MT.WW RA&W W/PANT FRRSII ¢Cy C COLOR:SWISM7 BLACK OF NIGHT i Q1 ENTRY WW(I0 LIAICJI EQUAL € j 4 West Elevation SCALE: I/a-1'-0' AU-IIEN-LW-L000 EXTERIOR DOOR $m s 23 CLASS PANEL WWW COLOR:WALNUT.OlASS CLEAR W STANDARD WGIN0 PATIO DOOR CA Ed7AL x 4 E LlGARU TUSCANY A"TECITO SERIES ... COLOR:BRCINZE JR i �9AIF N -YENr NOfnEDNTAL sicw omw m EOJN W MILC D,TUSCANY&MCNTECITY SERIES `.- -- COLOR:BRONZE Epp, - - 10 SMOLE HUNG WIDOW CR EWAL d ARCARD,TMCANY k MOIRECITT SERIES COLOR:BRONZE 'SIR II CASEIEIfi WNOO1r OR EglRk �I LRSARP TUSCANY @ VONTECITY 9W5 COLOR:RRONAE Ip STONE g3 F F CORONADO SLOE RIMER ROCK COLOR:#SERT RUST A Lo ❑ W D 3 East Elevation W-ALe pp co r FS DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL p Q JELD-Wm-IWP 343E OLASS PANEL �>y 0 2 F L— CO w W GARAGE DOOR OR MATCH EQUAL CC Q J MLOPAY,CANYON ROOF CARIdA(E HOUSE. ❑ LU LEI SERIES I,DESIGN IZ, //r Z W60M REM IS 5 GLASS SEEDED.CDLM WALNUT F1H@I pa WOM CAREIELS FASCIA BOARD,YOWN 8 OOCR TRIM. I = - WOOD COLUNN W/PAINT PUSH &-ON"VALLI"PAINT: g VCOLRSW NMI ROYCROn WHIM ORMOI �� �4r YAP yF.A/yTwPn FS EXTMOR WALL IIONT OR RAFCI IDXJX �a HRIKLEY,TUCM,SMMi WALL MOUNT LANTERN, qu Igo MB.Fgyf BLACIL IR.11,57 L7 wLus E W/PAINT FNSN x BURN WILUAM PAINT. tt r� South C CU.LR!SF,QOAR WYCROFT ORONU OREEM 2 �FWF Elevation SCALE: I/E I'-O" q rw.�w�sN TT$ ]' wALRW[R�Y n 5g o4ORA!N: n WUT ���$ RFtvxTtlrtpi =J_ ZI L F2EVISI�N A3.01 E i North Bevatian SCALE: 1117771 OF OR >, E E C2020-00195 SHEETS T 8 T Reference Notes [D aXD R3125 T,STACO17A >•`clECT,STYLE'CAF6IRANQ 'p� - --- ----- cHxar y12$TERRAcnTTa -r S1UCCp W/pAINI FMSH LA NABRA SRIL[O:SAND FLOAF 20/.70 OR EGIA MOO V PAVIC 5AND,BASE 20D 0D-LV4 BY VEFO AKRKAAC DYI IIF14fPTCE k,% FRP TUSCAN TAPERED ROUND OR MATCH TO EONAL p�5=Tum m PF L ma Ct lam STAWAFNgL IIGI fi1FTltl FYc(1Ep WF ryR �1 w]SIDING PAWDOOR OR E WILGAR .s YILGARO:TYSCANY V YOM1Epia SETAESES VaHITE 5 WLQA TENT SGANT&AL SLId1G XMHOO'k OR EWK $ z WLDARO NSCAHY#YORIEPTY gRES COLM MATE $ a ©SIRLE HUNG MNDOW OR EWAL i O wL m m.TUSCMV R MONTECITT SEWS 4 west elevation SCALE: ,/9"-I'-0" GROR:INYTEE L$i N �T CAS0"T 09M OR EOIIAL wLGRD:%SCARY h YONIEGTV SERIES y e OOLm..MGTE ®ENTRY DUDE OR MATCH EOOAL gT RCLLA,7 PANEL EDNTI N OUS SPRMPAE $ _ "REARM WOW ENTRY DOOR 1t Z u u-u UOIOR:LHAPPO i II Q DOOR CR MAnN[Wk € ,ELD-WEN E FINERLA55 EXTERIOR WM BFT-IlV9{ t y! i0 GARASE WOR OR MATCH EONAL clltl F E A.OPAY,CANYON RID4 CARRIAGE ROUSE f SEWS I,DESIGN o pP F N WNWW.AEC II,(LASS SEEDED. •R ___ _________ aXW.VALNL,1 FIM9, E6 = W z I I CA C 3 East Elevation SCALE' ,/Ir-I'-0 FASbA 00MI0,MWN a DOOR TRIM R/PAN FfM%I � ~ ©SHEIMAN%AWAY PLANT, d O Q CCA-m SW9996♦pmY NAIDRAL ¢d J ♦- (0 Ljj 1y19 CL Q J 12 EXTERIOR VAC{LIGHT OR MATW EDUA1 S� Q LLN L11 "NKLEY_MANOR NOMSE tes 2 5N11:IIIEQR,FKS H:ELAUC NT:IN, S _ — cFF TRELLIS E V/PARR FINIIN g ` SHERMN YAWAYS PAINT. �y m ® 1f ® CYiLK:S090 JAVA �ppt3 ,T N0O 36-NT.METAL RARl1p W/PANT PIA19H +'u,IP yFAa/s*•,.: SNETAMN YAWAVS PAINT. Ir-F"- - ------ - ----------- --- - -- Cd.IXI:4y5995&ACE fif mGHI ;YP 2 South Elevation ��E grFRx>fa Tlr• n 6 vc.aa Hlr n FeEVISIG[V i�'4•- - --- ---- --- - ---- --- - - �� -------� - F 1 NO il�..A�l t*tev� CAL SE: A3.0 OF BHEETs DRC2020-00195 s H a e 7 PLANTLEGEND NK TREES SVM BOTANICALNAME COMMONNAME I-A .XSPD. T1 ODOLARPUB GRALILIOR 0'x10-20' MOO T2 LAGERSTROEMIA'MUSKI-'- EECRAP 5'x12 MOD. TS MAGNOLIA G.'D.D.BLANCHARID SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA HYBRID MOD. GEUERA PARVIFLORA INSTRIIIAN WILLOW SHRUBS SVM BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME HT SPD. WUCOLS S.R.C LARKE LANDSCAPE CIETUS I MLNSFT ROSEARCHITECTURE&DEVELOPMENT 110 COPPERWOOD WAY W 'x3i' LOW OCEANSIDE CA 9205 TECOMA CAPENSIS EHONEYSUCKLELOw PpT6011&2100 LU1p52 GROUNDCOVER �. APN 0202 342 46 DDDD y` �� w(2 a /c) � I I \ N 2�'45 DD � SVM NAME COMMON NAME m (2xD9fAC)— .x SPD. WUCOL9 LANTANA'NEWGOLD' NEW GOLD LANDTANA 1 GA2'x4' LOWROBMAR 'HINTONC:ROMARYHYBRD1G4RF GR ROT —UP HGH v�21 °NATIVE BIOSWALE SEED MIX -- Mf�F pF 2pP° r T MULCR HIGH GRADE SHREDDED STYLE " ..25.. ° NOTES: V AbNIXDiDG RE Bins LC CURMoNa moss Arvo aeoauio 1 FORMTO THE STANDARDS of THE CITY of RANCHO 1 / EI' - L (z�Du/ hAC APE 2 =Q, o RRGAr ON AREAS N THE PUBLIC RGHr of wnv SHALL NTA NE Eo m DN ,Lq s BE MA BY TH wNER 1 l ILLl SETBACK -,0 A I "l. -- 'IN ECAREASSHAD BE MA NTANED FREE OSFSOEBRSAND LTrER ALL PLANT MAiAER z L,f, BHALLBEMARTANED NA' LTHYGRDWNGLDNDTDN DGEAGEDORDE DP NTMAr . s, Ili 2�flNpY 1 SHALL BE SATEFACTORLY TREATED OR REPLACED PER THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERM TE J Z I� 11 - % - 1 2 LOT 1 r --1 1 3 ALL GRADED DISTURBED,OR ERODED AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE PERMANENTLY PAVED OR R LLI x I T T m 1 3 COVE RED BY STRUCTURES SHALL SE PERMANENTLY REVEGETATED AND RRGATED. 0 1�� }x „ — — 4 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES 9HALLBECONSIDERED AND ENHANCED WITH 1- uN Z 1 5 oscnvE r H H caRAo He oB�ecT ves LL INCLUDE POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE OF Q _� p %1 / PLANTED AREAS THROUGHOUT THE SITE.Ew L.L. a = r 1 4 TEST BYAOUALFEO AGRONOMIST SHALL INFLUENCE PLANT MATERIALS AND U ——_ LAT ON TECHNIQUES z _ 3 1 �` '� NDTU-ED TO CONFORM iO RECOMMENDATIONS W � BA. 3 AND,DR ANDBLAPEARLHTELT NDROERTDPRDMOTE o i 1 r HEALTHY AND AGORoOS PLANT—OWl H U 3 _ 25 0" U 7"o 1 �� 2 ` i G PESDEN LO B ALL PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE TREATED WITH SOIL CONDITIONERS TO INCREASE w J 3 E SETBACK m m 1 .,y.NE2 /(p) C AND RETArvsoL MOISTURE. 7 0 1 "rn 0A0 F'4 9 MULCH:ALL REQUIRED PLANTING AREAS AND ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHOUT VEGETATION 3 0 1t ' 21. SHALL BE COVEREDw WITH MULCH TO AM MINIMUM DEPTH OFS INCHES,EXCLUDING SLOPES ^w 2(naou fLOT 10.uLPUNr NAREAs sHDA�L BE MA NTNNED N AwEED AND DEER B FREE CONDITION. � 1 —_ 11 NON B OD GRADARLE ROOT BARR ERE SHALL BE INSTALLED WERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 5' n _ OF PUBLIC MPROVEMENTSINCLUONG WALKS CURBS OR STREETPAVEMENT ORWHERENEW yp�X m V 1 ?` ' BE WRPPPED AROUN THEROOT�LLP➢JACENr TO EX ST NG TREES ROOT BARR ERSW LL NOT W z Z T _ < — TRE 12 ES 6HPLL FAC NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY UNDERGROUNDILfIV. ~ wTREEETHATAREPU-TEDNANYEASEMENTw LLNEEDTHECITYSAPPROVALwr ER F J iiHORvnmour NEXT BARRIER. U, z. O � F; LO 1. �i o D NE5 66� AC A WATER BUDGET ". PN. LANDSCAPE QTY. HVDROZONE AREA CITY. jl zoNC L (z a Du/Acj - to LA=19,164 SOFT. HA1(HIGH)=NA I I i SLR=6,]9]SEPT.(TURF) HA2(.ED)=2dd8 SEPT. �LOT 3 MONTHLY AVG.ETD=38.661N. HA3(LOVJ)=i6,]pB SEPT, (n M I / Tp w E �17 MAXIMUM ALLOWED(MAWA) ESTIMATED USE(EMU) AMOUNT UNDER MAWA 304.249.44 GAL. 200.026.89 GAL. 106.226.55 GAL. O W U -:•' ,' Q Z ........ T� - - -- LLLL i< `- Lu EXISTING TREE NOTE U a -- - - -'- _ SC[REE_N,i-T{-IL _ - NO EXISTING TREES ARE TO REMAIN ON SITE,ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED. J O>Q i '.�I I �' -'.1 L - _ � _ - ���sAN-SERN>R0 No courvn I -.__ ,.o...�< Z v CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 10' 20' ii w SCALE:-1'= 20' a NORTH EETHA ®SITE PLAIN MOD-5121 �sI EPLAN"ll s EET L1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS June 1, 2021 7:00 p.m. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE — WM LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. - A request to subdivide a vacant 2-acre parcel into 6 lots for the development of 6 single- family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall height, and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a site within the Low (L) Residential District.. APN: 0202-061- 32. Tentative Tract Map, Design. Review, Minor Exception, and Tree Removal Permit. (SUBTT20353, DRC2020-00195, DRC2021-00038, DRC2021-00119) Site Characteristics: The rectangular project site is approximately 350 feet (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south). The existing grade is approximately 1,475 feet along the north property line and 1,465 along .the south property line, for a grade change of about 10 feet. Vegetation includes native and non-native vegetation along with various trees scattered on site. Street improvements along the project's frontage on Hellman Avenue have not been constructed. The existing, Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low L Residential District North Single- Family Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Residences South Single-Family'Residencel Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District West Vacant Low Residential Low L Residential District Project Overview: The proposed Tentative Tract Map includes 6 numbered lots and 1 lettered lot. The lettered lot is for stormwater drainage and will be maintained by the homeowner's:association. All 6 lots fronts a cul-de-sac which will be constructed with the proposed subdivision. This cul-de-sac will. connect to an existing street, Billings Place. As demonstrated on Table A of Sheet "T" on the project plans, all 6 lots complies with all pertinent development standards such as lot area, lot width, lot depth and lot frontage, as outlined in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC). The project site is not within the Equestrian Overlay. Therefore, no equestrian trails are proposed with the project. House Product and Architecture The project includes a Design Review (DRC2020-00195) for the residences on the 6,new lots. As demonstrated in Table B on sheet "T" of the project plans, all proposed house product meets all pertinent standards for single-family development within the Low (L) Residential District, per RCMC Table 17.36.010-1. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS SUBTT20353—W&W LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. June 1, 2021 Page 2 Five (5) separate floor plans are proposed, along with six (6) different elevations featuring variations in the Craftsman and Mission architectural,styles. This exceeds the three (3) different floor plans required, and two (2) varying types of elevations required per floor plan as prescribed in RCMC Section 17.122.010. The Development Code requires subdivisions of 5 or more lots to include a minimum of 25 percent of single-story plans. The project features a total of four (4) single-story homes and two (2) two-story homes, exceeding this requirement. Each floor plan and architectural variation includes wall and roof plane articulation and carries the architectural design theme to each elevation (360-degree architecture). Each plan includes design elements that emphasize the chosen architectural style including the use of stucco or wood siding, exposed rafter tails, architecturally correct window and door surrounds, window shutters, wrought iron accents, and tile roofs. The plans also include the use of decorative garage and front entry doors that emphasize the architectural style. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design(building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Director/ Planning Commission: ®Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant: ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director Planning Commission. ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. I-]Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Michael Smith, Principal Planner CITY OF • CUCAMONGA *70081 Design Review Committee Meeting AGENDA June 1 , 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order The meeting of the Design Review Committee was held on June 1, 2021. The meeting was called to order by Mike Smith, Staff Coordinator, at 7:00pm. Design Review Committee members present: Francisco Oaxaca, Diane Williams. Staff Present: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and, after noting there were no public comments, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2021. Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Project Review Items D1. LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST CORNER FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (12939 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) — WOOD PARTNERS — A request for a Design Review to construct a mixed-use development comprising of 255 residential units and 5 live/work units and a Minor Exception to reduce the number of required parking stalls by 11% within the Community Commercial (CC) District.. APNs: 0229-311-14 and -15. Design Review and Minor Exception. (DRC2020-00440, DRC2020-00441) Staff presented the project with a recommendation that the Design Review Committee move the project forward to the Planning Commission provided that the applicant incorporate at least 2,500 square-feet of commercial space along the Foothill frontage, in order to better justify the "mixed use" component of the project. Williams said that the project should incorporate a tot lot as part of the project's amenities, since 2 and 3-bedroom units may have children living in them. She also suggested that a dog run be included. Committee member Williams also expressed concerns about the parking reduction sought for by the project, stating that reduced parking may lead to parking overflow to the surrounding neighborhood. Williams also stated that she agrees with staffs recommendation that commercial space be added to the project and noted that the project as currently proposed looks more like an apartment project, rather than a true mixed-use development. Committee member Oaxaca said that the architectural design of the project overall was handled well but suggested that the building incorporate more vertical articulation to break up massing. He also agreed with committee member Williams regarding adding a tot lot and a dog park to the project, in order to increase the number of active amenities, Oaxaca also agreed with committee member Williams about incorporating more true commercial space for the project. Oaxaca said that at this time, he is not supportive of the parking reduction, and will await further analysis/findings during the Planning Commission meeting. Finally, Oaxaca mentioned that he would also like to see more outreach about the project, possibly in the form of an additional neighborhood meeting. The Committee voted to require the project to return to the Design Review Committee forreview after the applicant has addressed the concerns expressed during the meeting. 2-0 Vote The Committee took the following action: x Recommend the project return to the Design Review Committee. 2-0 Vote. D2. LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE — W&W LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. - A request to subdivide a vacant 2-acre parcel into 6 lots for the development of 6 single- family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall height, and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a site within the Low (L) Residential District.. APN: 0202-061- 32. Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception, and Tree Removal Permit. (SUBTT20353, DRC2020-00195, DRC2021-00038, DRC2021-00119) Staff presented the project and noted that the applicant has made a number slight revisions to the project plans in response to the neighborhood meeting. The applicant increased setbacks along the northerly portion of the project and added landscape trees in order to soften the transition between the new houses and the existing neighborhood. The applicant has also plotted single-story homes along the southerly portion of the project to maintain privacy for the existing homes south of the project site. Committee member Williams and Oaxaca said they liked each lot has a unique home and appreciated the applicant's willingness to respond to neighborhood concerns. They also appreciated the inclusion of single-story homes on the project. Committee member Oaxaca stated that he would like to see an increased patio cover depth of at least 12 feet in order to increase usability. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project move forward to the full Planning Commission, provided that patio depths for all homes be increased to at least 12 feet. 2-0 Vote The Committee took the following action: x Recommend approval to PC/PD. E. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes —June 1, 2021 Page 2 of 2 Draft RESOLUTION NO. 21- 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20353, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES INTO 6 LOTS WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0202-061-32. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at 6929 Hellman Avenue; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 2 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 250 feet (north to south); and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-41 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20353—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS August 11, 2021 Page 2 East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District West Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District d. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 6 lots for single-family residential development; and e. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to the Low (L) Residential district as described in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The minimum lot depth proposed within the subdivision is 125 feet, which meets the minimum required lot depth of 100 feet. The minimum lot width proposed is 70 feet, in compliance with the minimum 70-foot lot width requirement. Individual lot areas will range between 8,670 square feet to 14,998 square feet, which are in excess of the required minimum 7,200 square-foot lot size. The minimum average lot area is 11,669 square feet, in excess of the minimum 8,000 square foot average lot size; and f. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2020-00195 for the architectural review of 6 single-family residences, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 to remove 16 Heritage Trees, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 for a 1-foot wall height increase over the City's 6-foot wall height requirement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 2 acres into 6 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential which is intended for the development of single-family residences with a typical density of 2-4 units per acre. The proposed development will have a density of 3 dwelling units per acre which is within the density range expected for properties under the Low Residential General Plan Designation. b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development projects. The proposed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-41 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20353 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS August 11, 2021 Page 3 development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres, surrounded by single-family residential uses. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00195, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0202-061-32. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2020-00195, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. A. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at 6929 Hellman Avenue; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 2 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 250 feet (north to south); and c. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single- Family Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Residences South Single-Family Residence/ Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC August 11, 2021 Page 2 West Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District d. The proposed project consists of the construction of 6 single-family residences and ancillary site improvements: and e. The application is in conjunction to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353 for the subdivision of a vacant parcel into 6 single-family lots, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 for the removal 16 Heritage Trees, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 to allow a height increase of 1 foot over the maximum wall height; and f. The project complies with all pertinent development standards related to building height, lot coverage, front/rear setbacks; and g. The project complies with the residential front yard landscaping requirements as prescribed in the Development Code. h. The proposed single-family residences will comply with the development standards applicable to the Low (L) Residential Zoning District. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct 6 single-family residences on each lot of a concurrent 6-lot subdivision (SUBTT20353). The underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential; and b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The property is surrounded on three sides by single-family residential development; and C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres and surrounded by single-family development. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC August 11, 2021 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11t" day of August 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2021- 00119, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 16 HERITAGE TREES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0202-061-32. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at 6929 Hellman Avenue; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 2 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 350 feet(east to west) by approximately 250 feet(north to south); and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-43 TRP DRC2021-00119 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS August 11, 2021 Page 2 West Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District d. Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 is for the removal of 16 Heritage Trees. An Arborist Report (JAG Landscape Services, September 2019) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of all 40 trees on-site, 17 of which are Heritage Trees. The report concludes that based on the poor condition of a majority of the trees on the project site, a total of 39 trees will need to be removed, including 16 Heritage Trees; and e. The application is in conjunction to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353 for the subdivision of a vacant parcel into 6 single-family lots, Design Review DRC2019-00558 for the construction of 6 single- family residences, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 to allow a height increase of 1 foot over the maximum wall height. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related Tentative Map (SUBTT20353) will be consistent with the General Plan. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 6-lot single-family subdivision; and b. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated with the development of the project site. In this case, removal of the trees is necessary to construct the related 6-lot single-family subdivision. The Arborist Report submitted for the project (JAG Landscape Services, September 2019) concluded that based poor health of a majority of on-site trees, a total of 39 trees, 16 of which are considered Heritage Trees, will need to be removed; and C. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed. The removed trees will be replaced by 69 trees as part of the proposed project; and d. The proposed Tree Removal Permit, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 16 trees will be replaced with new trees as part of the overall landscape theme. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres and surrounded by single-family development. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-43 TRIP DRC2021-00119 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS August 11, 2021 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2021-00038, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 7 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, ADJACENT TO LOTS A, 3, AND 4, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 6-LOT SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6929 HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0202-061-32. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2021- 00038 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at 6929 Hellman Avenue; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 2 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 250 feet (north to south); and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-44 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES August 11, 2021 Page 2 South Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District West Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District d. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet; and e. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 7 feet adjacent to lots A, 3, and 4 within the subdivision; and f. The application is in conjunction to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353 for the subdivision of a vacant parcel into 6 single-family lots, Design Review DRC2019-00558 for the construction of 6 single-family residences, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119 to remove 16 Heritage Trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan designation of the project site is Low (L) Residential, and the zoning of the property is Low (L) Residential District. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site. b. The Minor Exception is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house and the property line wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-44 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES August 11, 2021 Page 3 have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres and surrounded by single-family development. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a construction noise reduction plan for Planning Department review and approval. The plan shall depict the location of all construction equipment and how noise from all equipment will be addressed during project grading and construction. 2. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120?D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with the City's noise standards or construction halted. 3. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools. Internal combustion engines should be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer and in good repair. All diesel equipment should be operated with closed engine doors and should be equipped with factory?recommended mufflers. Construction equipment that continues to generate substantial noise at the project boundaries should be shielded with temporary noise barriers, such as barriers that meet a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25, sound absorptive panels, or sound blankets on individual pieces of construction equipment. Stationary noise?generating equipment, such as generators and compressors, should be located as far as practically possible from the nearest residential property lines. 4. Provide notification to residential occupants adjacent to the project site at least 24 hours prior to initiation of construction activities that could result in substantial noise levels at outdoor or indoor living areas. This notification should include the anticipated hours and duration of construction and a description of noise reduction measures being implemented at the project site. The notification should include a telephone number for local residents to call to submit complaints associated with construction noise. Exhibit H www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. If feasible, removal of vegetation with suitable nesting bird habitats should be scheduled to occur in the fall and winter (between September 1 and January 31), after fledging and before the initiation of the nesting season. For construction activities occurring during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31), surveys for nesting birds covered by the CFGC and the MBTA shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than seven days prior to vegetation removal for the project. The surveys should include the disturbance area plus a 100-foot buffer around the site, as feasible without trespassing on private lands. If active nests are located, construction work shall be conducted outside a buffer zone from the nest to be determined by the qualified biologist. The buffer shall be a minimum of 50 feet for non-raptor bird species and at least 100 feet for raptor species, or as determined by a qualified biologist. Larger buffers may be required depending upon the status of the nest and the construction activities occurring in the vicinity of the nest. The buffer area(s) shall be closed to all construction personnel and equipment until the adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest site. A qualified biologist shall confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and young have fledged the nest prior to removal of the buffer. If buffer zones are determined to be infeasible, a full-time qualified biological monitor shall be onsite to monitor construction within the buffer zones to ensure active nests and nesting birds are not impacted. 6. Construction contractors shall sweep all on-site driveways and adjacent streets and roads at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads. 7. Construction contractors shall minimize the area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 8. Construction contractors shall treat all graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways to minimize fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll compaction as appropriate. Watering shall be done as often as necessary, and at least twice daily, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. 9. Construction contractors shall monitor all graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods, such as water and roll compaction, and environmentally safe dust control materials, shall be applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. If no further grading or excavation operations are planned for the area, the area shall be seeded and watered until landscape growth is evident, or periodically treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. 10. Construction contractors shall stop all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations during periods of high winds (20 miles per hour or greater, as measured continuously over a one-hour period). Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 12. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 14. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 15. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 16. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 18. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 19. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 21. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 22. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 23. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 24. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 25. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 26. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 27. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 29. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 30. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 2. "Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street. a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developers expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on opposite sides of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite of the street from the project: The Developer shall pay a fee to the City for one-half the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section 1 above and be eligible for reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street." 3. "Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In-Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee" 4. The minimum useable flat area for the City maintained storm drain easement in Lot 4 shall be 12-feet. Near Billings Court, at the location of the return fencing/wall, a 12-foot wide gate shall be installed in-lieu of fencing to provide the City and CVWD access to the underground utility pipes. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. From the proposed design, it is not practicable to provide an emergency overland escape route for the storm water flows. To minimize the possibility of flooding due to the catch basin clogging, the proposed public storm drainpipe shall be sized for 2-times the 100-year storm event flow. The project shall have 2 separate catch basins side by side, with each catch basin capable of conveying the 100-year storm event. 6. Lot A Infiltration Basin shall be privately maintained by the Tract xxxx Homeowner's Association and shall be specifically described in the project's CC&R's. 7. Lot 4 shall not be permitted to install any structures over the public storm drain easement. This will be described in the project's CC&R's. 8. The project CC&R's shall note that any flat work constructed over the public storm drain easement shall be the responsibility of the owner of Lot 4 to replace should the City/CVWD require removal, replacement, repair of the public storm drain line and sewer line. 9. For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to handle Q100 and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the Q100 if the sump outlet is plugged. 10. Planning Commission Resolution 92-17 states that drainage from single family lots shall flow directly to streets. If cross-lot drainage is determined to be necessary, "drainage from only one lot shall flow through only one other lot." Cross-lot drainage shall be contained in a concrete/rock lined swale or reinforced concrete pipe (12" minimum diameter). 11. The overflow drainage easement over Lot 2 shall not have slopes within the easement. If required, a retaining wall shall be constructed along the edge of the drainage easement to maintain a relatively flat area to allow the storm water to flow. 12. Drainage facilities crossing LMD areas shall be shown on the public landscape plans 13. Where single family residential developments back onto arterial streets, the area outside the perimeter wall will be maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District, unless a homeowners ' association is established for that purpose. 14. All cross lot drainage easements, such as shown on Lot 2, shall be private drainage easements and shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 15. At the south end of Billings Court, there are proposed two under parkway drains on each side of a catch basin. These under parkway drains shall be modified City Std. Plan 107-A drains with the slope of the drain at 2% from the flowline of the curb down to the parkway to allow the inlets to act as interceptors for the 2-year storm event to met the Low Impact Development (LID) requirements for the project. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 16. In accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 18. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 total feet on Hellman Avenue 60 total feet on Billings Place (full width) 19. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 20. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 21. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: Hellman Avenue. 22. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Grading Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 23. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 24. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 26. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. The project is required to annex into the following districts: LMD 1, SLD 1 and SLD 2. 27. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: All publicly maintained improvements such as street and storm drain improvements. 28. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: All publicly maintained improvements such as street and storm drain improvements. 29. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 30. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project is required to annex into the following districts: LMD 1, SLD 1 and SLD 2. 31. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas ( percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 32. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 33. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 34. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace determined during design A.C. Pvmt: Remove and replace determined during design Side-walk : Remove and replace determined during design Drive Appr.: Not permitted Street Lights: Determined during design Street Trees: Bike Trail: Class III Other Street Name: Billings Court Curb & Gutter: A.C. Pvmt: Side-walk Drive Appr.: Street Lights: Street Trees: Other Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 35. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Hellman Avenue Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia indica Common Name: Crape Myrtle (Tuscarora) Min. Grow Space: 20' on center standard trunk Spacing: 20' on center Size: 15 gallon min. Qty.: To be determined during design Street Name: Billings Court Botanical Name: Chionanthus retusus Common Name: Chinese Fringe Tree Min. Grow Space: 20' on center standard trunk Spacing: 20' on center Size: 15 gallon min. Qty.: To be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 38. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: 39. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 40. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 41. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 43. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 44. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, T-24 energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department. 11. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Engineering Services Department Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 15. The conceptual grading and drainage plan is showing driveway slopes exceeding 10%. Therefore, prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show driveway profiles for each side of the driveway from the street curb line to the garage door(s). 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 17. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 20. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 21. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 22. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 24. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 25. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 26. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 27. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". The infiltration testing of the bottom of the basin shall be performed after the basin has been constructed. 29. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 30. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20353 Project Name: EDR - Hellman 6-Lot Homes (Tentative Tract Map) Location: 6929 HELLMAN AVE - 020206132-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. www.CityofRC.us Printed:6/16/2021 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353, Design Review DRC2020-00195, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 I, Winston Liu, as applicant for the above referenced applications hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353, Design Review DRC2020-00195, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038, for property located north at 6929 Hellman Avenue, APN 0202-061-32, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 11, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-41, 21-42, 21-43, and 21-44 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20353, Design Review DRC2020-00195, Tree Removal Permit DRC2021-00119, and Minor Exception DRC2021-00038 Exhibit I CITY Nis . RANCHO ■ . ! . ! DATE: August 11, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 8443 HAVEN AVENUE — HAVEN CITY MARKET — A request to modify an existing Conditional Use Permit (DRC2015-00959) and to add an Entertainment Permit to allow for indoor and outdoor, temporary and permanent uses at an existing food hall located within the Industrial Park District, Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Commercial Overlay District. The action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities; APN: 0208-622-27. Conditional Use Permit Modification, Entertainment Permit (DRC2021- 00149, DRC2021-00195). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2021-00149 and Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to expand the range of permitted uses under existing Conditional Use Permit (DRC2015-00959) and to add an Entertainment Permit at Haven City Market to permit indoor and outdoor, temporary and permanent uses. The existing Conditional Use Permit allows Haven City Market to operate as a food hall and grocery market. The Director has referred this application to the Planning Commission pursuant to the following provision in the Development Code:17.14.060 Approving Authority. Section C. Referral to the Planning Commission. At any point in the application review process, the Planning Director may transfer decision making authority to the Planning Commission at his/her discretion because of policy implications, unique or unusual circumstances, or the magnitude of the project. Decisions referred to the Planning Commission shall be considered as a noticed public hearing. A referral to another decision-maker is not an appeal and requires no appeal application or fee. BACKGROUND: Haven City Market("HCM") is an approximately 85,000 square foot food hall with a 21,000 square foot outdoor eating area in a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres. The center is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, bounded to the north and south by Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route, respectively. The center consists of seven (7) buildings: two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings, and a multi-tenant retail building (Exhibit A). HCM occupies the inline anchor tenant space of the multi-tenant retail building. Vehicular access to the site is granted via drive entrances along Arrow Route, Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Commercial Center General Industrial Park District',' Commercial/Industrial Park North City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic/Regional Industrial Park District' City Hall West Vacant Land Industrial Park Industrial Park District' South Commercial Offices Industrial Park Industrial Park District' East Warehouses Industrial Park Industrial Park District 1-Haven Avenue Overlay District(HAOD) 2- Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD) PROJECT ANALYSIS A. Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959: The existing Conditional Use Permit, approved by the Planning Director on August 31st, 2016, permitted the operation of thirty-four (34) food- related tenant spaces (approximately 59,000 square feet), a gourmet market(approximately 20,500 square feet), and an art gallery (5,619 square feet) at HCM (Exhibit B). The majority of food-related tenant spaces are located in stalls accessible via corridors inside the building. Five tenant spaces are located in individual suites accessible from the exterior of the building. The approved gourmet market tenant space is only accessible via the interior corridors. The art gallery was approved to be located within a mezzanine area accessible via a semi-circular staircase and ADA-compliant elevator. To date, only the food-related tenant spaces have been constructed and are operating. The gourmet market and art gallery were never constructed.Additionally, the five exterior facing tenant spaces were constructed but are not occupied by food uses. Rather, two Conditional Use Permits were approved for individual tenant spaces to permit service uses. The approved uses are an indoor cycling studio (DRC2020-00081) and an indoor activity center for children (DRC2020-00210). A virtual reality gaming center was also permitted to operate in one of the tenant spaces. The remaining two units remain vacant. Additional entitlements were approved to expand the range of permitted uses in HCM. The following table outlines entitlements approved for HCM: Entitlements Type Date Action DRC2015-00959 Conditional Use Permit 08/31/2016 Establish uses in HCM DRC2015-01187 Conditional Use Permit 08/31/2016 Permit alcohol sales and wine tasting in market DRC2016-00202 Minor Exception 08/31/2016 Reduce parking requirements DRC2017-00023 Conditional Use Permit 02/20/2018 Permit restaurant with full liquor service DRC2020-00081 Conditional Use Permit 06/18/2020 Permit indoor cycling studio DRC2020-00210 Conditional Use Permit 07/15/2020 Permit indoor activity center Page 2 Note:All entitlement staff reports are included under Exhibit C Conditional Use Permit(DRC2015-01187)was approved to permit alcoholic beverage sales and tasting (Type 21 and 86) within the gourmet food market. Approval of both applications permitted the sale beer, wine and distilled spirits and on-site wine tasting. Conditional Use Permit (DRC2017-00023) was approved to permit a Restaurant with Full Liquor Service under a Type 47 License to operate in one of the food-related tenant spaces at the southeast corner of HCM. The tenant, Native Son Alehouse, currently operates a restaurant and serves food along with alcohol. The hours of operations are 11:00am to midnight, 7 days a week. A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00202) was approved to reduce the amount of required parking spaces by less than 25%. The Development Code requires a total of 1,155 parking spaces be provided with the incorporation of the subject project. However, the site only contains a total of 924 parking spaces, which is 20% less than the required amount. Based on a Parking Study by Kunzman and Associates, Inc. (March 2015) it was anticipated no more than 865 parking spaces of the existing 924 onsite parking spaces will be used (234 for existing uses and 631 for proposed Haven City Market). B. Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149: This Conditional Use Permit proposes expand the number of conditionally permitted uses onsite while maintaining all previous entitlement and their conditions of approvals. The following tables are established under Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 to outline temporary and permanent uses permittable in the various areas of the HCM: Temporary Uses/Events"O Parking Lot6'7'8'9 Unit Outdoor Tenant 101 Eating Area Spaces Live Music/Concerts2,4,5 N Y Y N Live Background Music3 N Y Y Y Other Special Gathering N Y Y Y Events2,4,5 Private Event/Weddin 52,4,5 N Y Y N Events with Alcohols N Y Y Y Cultural Events/Exhibits N Y Y Y Movie Night N Y Y Y Classes/Seminars/Workshops N Y Y Y Community Group Meetings N Y Y Y Farmer's Market Y Y Y N Night Market N Y N N Car Shows' Y N N N Fairs and Festivals' Y N N N Temporary Retail Space Y Y Y N Animal-Keeping/Petting Zoos N N N N Outdoor Sporting/Athletic Y Y N N Events' 1. All events shall conform to the City's performance standards(Chapter 17.66), including noise and odor standards. 2. Amplified or acoustical sounds permitted 3. Acoustical sounds only 4. Includes designated space for patrons to attend events. 5. Must notify San Bernardino Sheriff's Department of activities prior to event. Provide si na a and site lighting for all event occurring to safely direct attendees to intended destinations. Page 3 6. Separate with physical barriers event areas off from the rest of the parking lot. Provide vehicle and pedestrian paths of travel to ensure safe circulation. 7. Provide off-site parking spaces equivalent to 125%of the number of parking spaces dedicated to event space(e.g., 25 spaces needed offsite for 20 spaces used for temporary retail stalls onsite). 8. Up to 4 events are permitted a year. City events are exempt from the 4-event limit. 9. Ancillary sale of merchandise permitted. 10. "Y"=Use Permitted."N"=Use Not Permitted Exterior- Interior- Permanent Uses',' Facing Facing Unit 101 Mezzanine Suites Suites 13,731 SF 9,550SF 49,450SF (market) 5,619SF 6,680SF storage) Restaurants Y Y Y Y Grocery N N Y N Art Gallery N N N Y General Retail Y N Y Y Office Y N Y Y Indoor Fitness' Y N Y Y Indoor Amusement' Y N Y Y Education/Childcare/Tutoring' Y I N I Y Y 1. Individual uses limited to one (1) suite with a maximum size of 3,000 square feet. Limit is shared between all the categories.The Planning Director may approve of additional square footage. 2. Permanent uses are not permitted in the Parking Lot or Outdoor Eating Area. 3. The following uses are prohibited: 4. Liquor stores, Convenience stores,Adult-Oriented business, Gun sales, Gun ranges,Tattoo establishments,Smoke shops, Hookah shops, Secondhand dealer, Thrift stores, Bars/nightclubs, Animal-Keeping/Sales, Massage, Mortuary/Funeral home, Manufacturing,Warehousing,and Storage not part of an approved use. 5. "Y"=Use Permitted."N"=Use Not Permitted For each use proposed in HCM, the Planning Director determines whether a use is substantially similar to uses listed in the Permanent Uses or Temporary Uses/Events tables above. Uses that are deemed substantially similar will not be required to have a Conditional Use Permit (for permanent uses) or Temporary Use Permit (for temporary uses). The five exterior-facing tenant suites will be permitted to have uses in the"Permanent Uses" column of the table above. No changes are proposed to the existing interior-facing restaurant uses as approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959. The mezzanine space is permitted to have the art gallery as originally permitted under Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 or alternative office/retail uses. The mezzanine will be permitted to have the same uses as the exterior-facing tenant suites, including all applicable restrictions established in the Permanent Uses table above. Unit 101 was the originally designated space for the gourmet market. It was divided into a 13,731 square foot publicly accessible market space and 6,680 square footage back-of- house storage area. The gourmet market will still be permitted to occupy these two areas. However, in lieu of the market use, an "Entertainment Flex space" can be incorporated into the publicly accessible market space. The remaining 6,680 square footage area will remain as storage. The Entertainment Flex space will be permitted to host any temporary events consistent with the Temporary Use/Events table above. In addition to temporary uses, the Page 4 Permanent Uses table also specifies permanent uses (other than the gourmet market) that can be permitted within Unit 101. HCM will be permitted to have temporary events in the 21,000 square foot outdoor eating area. The range of events permitted in the outdoor area is established in the Temporary Use/Events table above. A Condition of Approval is included to limit all events to occupy up to 50% of the outdoor eating area, or approximately 10,500 square feet of space. The remaining 50% of the outdoor eating area will be maintained as seating for patrons not attending the temporary event. HCM will also be permitted to have events in the parking lot in front of the building. Events in the parking lot are required to be physically separated from the rest of the parking lot and ensure adequate vehicle circulation at all given times. A path of travel is required for pedestrian into the building. Signage and site lighting are required where and when necessary. When events occupy space designated for parking, off-site parking will be provided to make up for 125% of that loss (e.g., 25 parking spaces required off-site for every 20 parking spaces taken up). Up to 4 parking lot events are permitted a year. Approval for parking lot events is granted on a provisional basis and may be revised or revoked by staff during the first year period. All temporary events can vary in duration, size, time, etc. as long as the activity meets all City's performance standards per Section 17.66 of the City's Development Code, such as noise and odor. All activities will also have to conform with the California Building Code and occupancy requirements. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is granted on a provisional basis for a period of one (1) year. During that time, HCM is granted leeway to experiment with a variety of events that fall within the constraints placed by the Conditions of Approvals. The City reserves the right to re-evaluate the range of uses permitted and place additional restrictions on event types any time during the first year. Wherein a specific event type does not occur in that one (1) year period, the uses may be re-evaluated in future years. For example, if no live music/concert events occur within the first year, it can be reviewed in subsequent years. Events that deviate or intensify from events in the first year are subject to re-review. Any revisions to the facility to incorporate a permanent use where permanent uses have not been approved (i.e., Entertainment Flex space, parking lot and outdoor eating area) will require additional entitlements. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit does not constitute automatic permits to operate the uses indicated in the tables above. Prior to any commencement of any use, a Condition of Approval requires that all appropriate permits and Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. This requirement ensures that the space where the event or use occurs will conform to all California health and safety standards. Per Section 17.16.120 of the Development Code, the following findings shall be made, supported by facts as discussed below, prior to the approval of the subject Conditional Use Permit: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: Temporary uses are permitted throughout the City regardless of zoning district. Development Code Section 17.104 provides guidance on the ranges of temporary use Page 5 categories that are permitted in the City. Events such as concerts, fairs and festivals, farmer's markets, etc. are all conditionally permitted under a Temporary Use Permit. Section 17.104 also lists guidelines for specific temporary use permits. The events permitted and their guidelines are similar to the events and guidelines proposed under this Conditional Use Permit. The intent of the proposed Conditional Use Permit is to streamline the process for HCM to hold temporary events that are generally consistent with those permitted on other sites in the City. Permanent uses such as the previously approved restaurants in the interior spaces, the previously approved gourmet market, and the variety of non-restaurant uses permitted in the front-facing spaces and mezzanine, are all consistent with the uses permitted or conditionally permitted in the Industrial Park(IP) District of the Zoning District. All permanent uses will conform with performance standards (e.g. noise, odors) established in the City's Municipal Code. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The existing commercial center is well-designed to accommodate a wide variety of permanent and temporary uses. Pedestrian access is provided to the Entertainment Flex space, outdoor eating areas and all tenant spaces, and there is absence of physical constraints that would restrict access. The proposed uses will occupy previously unused spaces designated for the gourmet market and make use of existing spaces already dedicated to outdoor dining. Also, events are temporary in nature and subject to revision if it is discovered that it the density or intensity of events create impacts on adjacent neighbors. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: The proposed uses are located at an existing commercial shopping center. The permanent uses are consistent with uses found in other existing commercial shopping center. Temporary uses will be conditioned to meet all City performance standards, including but not limited to noise, circulation, and public safety. If impacts detrimental to public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare are discovered during the 1-year provisional time period, the City can re-evaluate the use and impose additional conditions as necessary. C. Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195: The applicant also submitted an Entertainment Permit in conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit application. The Entertainment Permit permits the operation of amplified music and/or dancing along with events being permitted at HCM under this Conditional Use Permit. The Entertainment Permit must be renewed annually to remain in good standing. Without the Entertainment Permit, HCM is limited to non-live music played from a recording device (e.g. radio) and/or unamplified music provided by no more than four performers. Dancing and disc jockeying are also not permitted without an Entertainment Permit. A Condition of Approval is included with this application that will require all activities in HCM, without or without an entertainment permit, to conform to the City's noise standards. Page 6 Per Section 17.16.170 of the Development Code, the following findings shall be made, supported by the facts as discussed below, prior to the approval of the subject Entertainment Permit: Finding: The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application is consistent to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. Fact: It is unlikely that approving the Entertainment Permit would erode the conduct of the establishment or impact public health, safety, morals, or welfare. Finding: The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in a legal, proper, and orderly manner. Fact: HCM has continued to adhere to City regulations and has maintained operation in an orderly manner. It is unlikely that approving the Entertainment Permit would cause HCM to operate in an illegal and/or unorderly manner. Finding: Granting the application would not create a public nuisance. Fact: The proposed Entertainment Permit is unlikely to create a public nuisance. All entertainment-related activities will be located onsite and will be conditioned to meet City performance standards, including noise, circulation, and safety. The Entertainment Permit is also subject to an annual renewal process. In the event that the Entertainment Permit creates public nuisance, and the condition is not remedied, the Entertainment Permit would potentially not be renewed. Finding: The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. Fact: The project site is located in the Industrial Park (IP) District and substantially surrounded by existing industrial uses and City Hall. The closest residential uses are the Avana Apartments, located over 800 feet away and across from Haven Avenue. The proposed activities permitted under the Entertainment Permit are unlikely to impact the peace and quiet of those neighborhoods given the distance and lack of adjoining property lines. In the event that the Entertainment Permit irreversibly impacts the peace and quiet of adjoining neighborhoods, the Entertainment Permit would potentially not be renewed. Finding: The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. Fact: The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement during the course of this application. In the event that City staff discovers false, misleading, or fraudulent statements have been made by the applicant, the Entertainment Permit could be revoked. D. Public Art: The project does not involve expansion of building square footage and is not subject to the public art requirement. E. Environmental Assessment: Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Page 7 Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves a modification of the approved uses and activities for an existing 85,000 square feet food hall. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on their own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed permanent and temporary uses will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. Temporary events hosted by HCM may also be ticketed. In the event that a fee is collected from attendees, a portion of that fee remitted to the City as Admission Tax. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value#7 (Continuous Improvement) by continuing to improve the existing commercial center. The proposed Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit will permit quality tenants to occupy underutilized spaces in Haven City Market. Fully occupied spaces will help keep Haven City Market a quality destination for residents in the City. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on July 29, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (124 addresses)within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A-Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Floor Plans for HCM Denoting Areas Exhibit C - Previous Entitlement Staff Reports Exhibit D - Draft Resolution 21-46 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 Exhibit E - Draft Resolution 21-45 of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195 Exhibit F — Conditions of Approval Exhibit G —Attachment A Exhibit H — Statement of Agreement DRC2021-00149 Page 8 a9 (on r G - - f .x w T�l�f . I 5 ryGcb 4.4 tl rrient I 3 t � � If K J e tea[ v - crow c , -r r „ � L IIo I I r Aw Cen rail c olDst mt pAbt t� G if v WC S _ fj6 t Tlr h ur ���jy zT,ar �- Cen a les tef'f L, str <4o,�, I m o i � o 1k 11 It ► _. AI iul a a,: , . B4O* Y HomeF d 9Corp .� IneFgnl + T C uato a Ma Fee MYIESHr - . r1.Delve !C , IH = I • _ + �Ry aaR ncM10 y ;'j' 4 - e ✓ a onpat rlments - r w sFeF`u, +f W r yy�� V 41 o ar Y �tp r. I Cel Ae apace C t al Care Resea Q � I �tl ■ vf, i ' r. lOf NCh st ;" Y t, orican - D Ab s Tbol, r - - I' aVe one Pl �e e solutions - ® t rpeFtCan -Sea _Tha EI etc 6 mPenY + APPIIanA R Pa r 1 ` 1 e D k ele 9 1 ' a StafFl g Gr ... p m dIB okkeep f -.� e _ � Go t T z r . . G .nr� A r Pra �e Pal6muP hk aR — _ n _ G�tEl en, J 7 oES ort F e c e m�11111 ums 4 �' x — ry Castaway Pools i� Che Whom & Assoc 4 o jFaute ,�rc� �.�q Frro Pc ne` - - Arravh Ouute - Aru iva nr aId A tej 4 �� a , _ se kl FtD+ 00 Idi Reference Notes [-I(E)TRANSFORMER TO REMAIN. 2❑(N)MONUMENT SIGN UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. H W x - U`�-J"' .. ❑3(E)PARKING TO REMAIN, c 4 m ;' I _ `- ", � -. ❑4 PROPOSED(N)1RANSfORIAER LOCATION. UG�m (E)LOADING/UNLOADING PLATFORM W/METAL - CANOPY ABOVE i0 REIAAIN. ©SETBACK MEASURED FROM FACE OF BUILD �m STREET CURB AND REAR PROPER 1O S o. ✓k 2 ❑(N)PARKING AT 9 LOCATIONS. wA E PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN od 1's SIDE LK TO OUTDOOR GARDEN. pK y /J .I� ❑9 MEANS OF EGRESS. /b /7 / t1 IEI Retal I 0 VEHICULAR ACCESS&TRAFFIC DIRECTION,. 'x. PROJECT DIRECTORY SIGN UNDER SEPARATE P AERIAfT. z' L Goa G d rl/-_ \ I - ❑2 ALCOHOL SERVE AREA W/42 HT,CABLE RAILING c - I TO MATCH OUTDOOR SEATING AREA,SEE H R n n n n n �I SIGN&GE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ROOMS OR 11� _ TMP, AREAS CONTANING CONTROLS FOR--CONDITIONING $ SYSTEM.AUTOMATIC FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM OR Y CONTROL ELEMENTS. a� b� I'.� (((((( .—� - ; ❑SEE NOT N 6SON A202 CONNECTION. D J _ ' i 7 D.0 AD A PARKING SEE ENLARGED PLAN &'2' �/ ®(E)PARKING TO REMAIN,REPAINT PARKING 1 - ] _ 1 STRIPING PER Cltt STANDARD,SEE I&2 } 0 �' ICI jLl TYP. _ I•^'^-i-...,• ❑J(N)20DO GAL GREASE INTERCEPTOR W/SAMPLE J K BOX AT TWO LOCATIONS,UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. " TYP.11 \\\ \�.�\ - cal — .� Q(E)10 UTILITY EASEMENT 4 p .N \ { B _ ❑9(E)6 SIDEWALK EASEMENT ak I o � (E)PARKING LOT LIGHT TO REMAIN. ENTRY. v'•i'n P OJ ©(N)CART CORRAL AT BUILDING M �W w ©(N)NO OVERNIGHT PARKING SIGN. I ©(N)EMPLOYEE PARKING ONLY SIGN IEI 'M� Q B o- ®(N)AOA DIRECTIONAL slcu. N s 3 s g g 6 B R — 3 Aft ®REMOVE&DISPOSE(E)GALURD. YP - 3 -FRONT 5 TBACk y 26(N) ELEG.EQUIPMENT CMU WALL ENCLOSURE f - T,Y 1 J 6 29 6"L% 0 e'W X 12'-O H,PROVIDE 46"DEEP FULL LENGTH 6'RAISED CONC.PLATFORM AT ELEC. - _ _ _ O EQUIPMENT AREA.SEE ELEC.PLAN FOR EQUIPMENT LOANiION.(E)SITE DRAINAGE i0 REMAIN,SEE SEE CIVIL (N)CABLE RAILING SYSTEM. I L � •t, -Qp OJ G ,- _ _ — _ —,{lam 1 -- ©6 N)3 W.CART CORRAL W/6 HT &24'WIDE ' � u i_ O❑ 11 Ir D 1 1 Q d-TO ®RETURN ON BOTH SIDES,PROVIDE WHEEL STOP n CONIC.CURB I� SIDES AND CART ' • O0 O - SIGN AT EACH LOCATKJN. uj ' \ ' WELL,SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. (N)60"H.CART RETURN SIGN. ri I 1 } _ ^ 1 J -- 3❑(N)SCORED COLOR GDNGRETE W/ACID FINISH AT EST SIDE SDEWALK&,GARDEN AREA -j — >' IEI Dental O}Ilcc ) � - 1 0 '? J LOR AST CREAM c s. SEE LANDSCAPE&HARpSCAPE PLANSPEED DO P TO . IN.I.C1 .)Y•' �:.. .,.�A P - _-1 REMAIN. �(E)SPEED BUMP TO MATCH E%Si NG ... ®(N)2 H x2 W K6 L METAL PLANTER BOX ALONG . SIDEWAY AOJ,DRIVEWAY EXCEPT MALL ENTRY. < N iy[{\ ©(N)TRUNCATED DOMES PAD AT ZERO CURB AREA W W lI^ "" 1. ALONG SDEWALK,MIN,3 O"FULL LENGTH. Y I- \ \ 4 36(N)CONNECTION. CHECK VALVE AND(E) FIRE DEPT. QDU U Z o -- 1 -_� r� _ _ _ r �a NQ SEPARATE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT IS UNDER Z U B , - - R SEPARATE SUBMITTAL/APPLICATION. W 2) KNOX BOTSO SHALL BE PROVIDED AT LOCATIONS U U a: r. REQUIRED By THE FIRE INSPECTOR. = N AA �,$.�..t,,� - 50 5 �.-r _— — ___ "_� 3)2013 ADA COMPUANX. Z Ur O T*�h:4&JO ROUTE n " -"" 4} THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY CAL/OSHA W le]U Z ... ... Y. ._ _.__ .. �....... ......- - :. - - _ PERMR AS REQUIRED BY CCR TITLE B.SECTION 341 a Z F _ ---' PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE BUILDING PERMIT, ''-----------'_-'--' ---_- -" ' WHERE EXCAVATIONS S ARE TO BE MADE HE W X 2 -- EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE DELINEATED AND THE W -- REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER(DIGALERT B11) G C SHALL 8E NOTIFIEDAT LEAST lWQ WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE WORK.[CA S & GOVERNMENT COOS 4216] Legend oRAVIENc F: — —PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK. IX-1 N Q.: ® —-�—MEANS OF EGRESS He NUHa[x A1.01 Proposed Site Plan SCALE: I"=30-D' TRAFFIC DIRECTION Exhibit B � I —� ---------- HAVEN AVE. I w a - m o � 0 o I _ ®9 0® E II � I YP� I 32 G V o 0 a o i � w I I 112 'E SLE SEieACn a s a g y y oo Ir , I _ itin <_ - — _ -- - k �< I a - 5>61 1� - — — I ® © ouo o o0 0 © 0 © � 0 ® 00 �0 0 0 ® o 0000 ooa o0000 xf � vAw � o _ w - - - A;N HE - - - � - - - f - - - n - a - o - - - wN - - - - - H H NDc a a G w HAVEN CITY MARKET aMn� a,s R1� .�owEss exr IN Ww+iN —MlsB T�1�.1. W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc A RAN HAVEN AVE. M"'^L �,`Oa ,F,r O RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 a . '� °asoiAL � No c rres _ Vu-NT[N N—UllNTn 3 g0 EXISTING SITE PLAN&NOTES axNcnENrns�oN eoe-rne vax fsosj sa6-,rsr avNCN N�swN HAVIEN AVE. � t _.a 1' mr191 r Io f G it III i ' ." �� II �-� �._�— •, �� / . i \ I 112' x SIDE SE a — _ 6 a ' W WI "WI. f I ... _ —L o. - - L - - - c — — 65 V ry t — -_.... -._-. �y, N IS pp .� S 1 _ ® ©Nowo o ® © o ® m © oo ® oo 0 0 0 A o N000 000 00000 gm - _ - - - _ o - - _ - - - - - - - ip _ 7a - S> - o_Fi ON 21 PH HAVEN CITY MARKET P c 6 ngE F�m__ �oRas SUe��s�aM,,,AE W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc RAN HAVEN AMEN „ c�cc -u6wl�rrns ^^'�•'rc^ m�' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 �?33 w. eEw..sm,E,.ua�ano,cn sys6 °rH�'ac"`EXISTING SITE PLAN$NOTES �(sos)�o x:fsos)sa owncn rnswvDID �.. -- HAVEN AVE. IF N I ` µ /❑ 0 r51 � s o I �'� �\gym v �� �`�. � � � �\`S<./• \ ,� `r� ,:�; �z F x I' I> ®� u i IVY C -9 T 5"DE 9cia A.h, u w , m w ; W - I J T W y =. N a J �L _ 1 2 �0 0 I 1 t. ,,ss;ue� 4 a. e I6._q.. u ❑ ...o �65 6. 5 `�. J .... _ T ® © oUo o oa ®_ 0000 000 00000 m - o _ - >n - _ - - - �fm m 'f >oo - n _ N ao9m _ 10 oar — _ No.nesnx HAVEN CITY MARKET c PaN�E«zx 5x„M,ra< g c..I. Sx 5can�.ra< W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc FDce A°oa�ss: 8443 HAVEN AVE., Er,mo iNc roa cuxw esueumnL al.zoi> Ind.�E PIAN cxEcrc x[- AAnAE NN 28.2UIE iE 5 h'.0 PA6NN.15LA el Yas O� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OA 91730 c ccc, Pxc„,F eu n cs cl sae_Ile IA.(ow>oa EXISTING SITE PLAN&NOTES RE15i0N rnvNEx nx„ n — P-tAWEP4 AVE. -.._ IF f I'M IL 0 m _ \ , `I ZIN Is V _ VL 0 J GO v� W W� v _ .._ W .-rW V _W - , 1 � I o_m I fit, — I � J - 1 - I am w 4 _ ... I �Y I !LAP ® o0 0 ® 00 � 0 ® 00 o a o ® o 0000 000 00000 m _ _ - - _ - - _ - co- - - mg='-_ off _ - - - 2, - - - _ k _ _f 8 -- - e HAVEN CITY MARKET °MnI m Lw,`,"°`�og';°,�„5=s a a. ?2066 W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc P00 RAN HAVEN AVE.,ON puFn�rin,r 11-n[_5u 11 nLrtA 1.H.z 7 c FOR F RANCHO CUCAfd ONGA, CA 91730 �� (90)o 0-18- su ee ulaMCF*F>,cinsug[Na[hsov gcsugNmnl. m(e°g)s°e-�iie Fnx:(gog)gas-ii3Y *E�.-EXISTING SITE PLAN&NOTES mrH�Eg Mayor L.Dennis Michae I Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo Council Members William J.Alexander,Lynne Kennedy,Diane Williams City Manager John R Gillison 10500 Civic Center Drive I P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807 `909.477.2700 www,CityofRC.us August 31, 2016 Lyfe Company, LLC. Attn: Tommy Ly 18414 Colima Road Rowland Heights, CA 91748 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00959 — LYFE COMPANY, LLC —A request to re-purpose a vacant building of 85,000 square feet to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor garden area on property located within the Industrial Park District, Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Commercial Overlay District at 8443 Haven Avenue —APN: 0208-622-27. Related Cases: Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187, Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198, Minor Exception DRC2016-00202, and Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2016-00402. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Dear Mr. Ly: The Conditional Use Permit process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves a modification to the exterior of an existing building of 85,000 square feet for a proposed food hall, gourmet market, and retail space. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Further, the project will include the addition of a 20,325 square foot outdoor patio area. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Planner has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. Project Description: 1. The applicant proposes to repurpose a vacant building of 85,000 square feet to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor garden area (Haven City Market). The subject building is within a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres located on the east side of Haven Avenue, and bound to the north and south by Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route. The center consists of seven (7) buildings - two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings, a multi-tenant retail building, and a Exhibit C APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00959— LYFE COMPANY, LLC August 31, 2016 Page 2 vacant major tenant building (the subject building) that was previously occupied by JC Penney. 2. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950 to modify the exterior elevations of the subject building and to add an outdoor garden area; Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187 to allow for alcoholic beverage sales and tasting (Type 21 and 86) within a gourmet food market (HK2 Food District); Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198 to allow for changes to an existing sign program to accommodate future tenants of Haven City Market; Minor Exception ORC2016-00202 to allow for a reduction of required parking spaces; and Public Convenience or Necessity to allow for retail alcohol sales within an over-concentrated census tract. 3. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, with the western portion of the parcel, including a majority of the parking area, in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD) and the eastern half of the parcel, including the building and future garden area, in the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) at 8443 Haven Avenue. The Development Code allows for Commercial (Re-Purposing) — Industrial uses within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 4. The floor plan indicates the interior of the building will contain thirty-four (34) food-related tenant spaces (about 59,000 square feet), a gourmet market (20,500 square feet), and an art gallery (5,619 square feet). Most of the tenant spaces will only be accessible from the interior of the building. The storefront tenants along the west side of the building will be directly accessible from the exterior of the building. The art gallery will be located within a mezzanine area that will be accessible via a semi-circular staircase and ADA-compliant elevator. 5. The hours of operation of Haven City Market will be 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily. All tenants will be opening and closing at the same time. The hours of the outdoor garden area will also be 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Haven City Market is anticipated to be open 365 days a year. 6. The project does not include a proposal for entertainment; however, the applicant has expressed interest in providing entertainment at a later date. Therefore, prior to entertainment being conducted at this site, including, but not limited to, live music, dj, dancing and karaoke, an Entertainment Permit applicant shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 7. The project includes a gourmet market of approximately 20,000 square feet to be located within the northern end of the Haven City Market, of which approximately 15,000 square feet will be dedicated to sales and display area and 5,000 square feet will be dedicated to back of house/storage area. A Conditional Use Permit (DRC2015-01187) was submitted and is being reviewed concurrently for the proposal to sell alcoholic beverages and conduct tasting (Type 21 and 86) within a gourmet food market. Since the site is located within an over-concentrated census tract (21.1), the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control required approval of a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2016-00402), which was approved by the City Council on June 15, 2016. Future tenants of the Haven City Market that apply for on-sale and off-sale alcohol licenses will be required to obtain land use approval by the Planning Department and may be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00959— LYFE COMPANY, LLC August 31, 2016 Page 3 8. The request for a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00202) is to reduce the amount of required parking spaces by less than 25%. The Development Code requires a total of 1,155 parking spaces be provided with the incorporation of the subject project. However, the site only contains a total of 924 parking spaces, which is 20% less than the required amount. Section 17.16.110 within the Development Code states that an exception may be granted for a reduction of up to 25% of the required parking spaces. Kunzman and Associates, Inc. prepared a parking study for the site and found that there will be sufficient parking for the proposed use. The study indicates that site visits were conducted on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Friday, March 13, 2015 and Saturday, March 14, 2015. Based on the site visits, Kunzman and Associates, Inc. found that the parking lot was most impacted on Friday between 10:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. At that time, there were 234 parking spaces being used. The study also indicates the Haven City Market requires 631 parking spaces to be provided. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed use will not negatively impact the onsite parking as it is expected that no more than 865 parking spaces of the existing 924 onsite parking spaces will be used (234 for existing uses and 631 for proposed Haven City Market). 9. Vehicular access to the site is granted via drive entrances along Arrow Route, Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive. 10. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on April 5, 2016. No major issues were raised at this meeting; however, secondary and policy items were discussed involving the proposed Uniform Sign Program Modification, walls and landscape requirements. The Committee agreed with staffs recommendations and recommended approval of this project. 11. Notice of the application was sent on April 18, 2016 to all property owners within 660 feet of the site. Staff received one inquiry within the 10-day comment period from a neighboring property owner/tenant. The tenant/owner ultimately wanted to know the type of uses that were being proposed. Staff informed him of the retail and food uses and no concerns were raised. Findings of Approval: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/ standards. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (1P) District, Haven Avenue Overlay (HAOD) District and Industrial Commercial Overlay (ICOD) District. The Development Code allows for Commercial (Re- purposing) — Industrial uses within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project involves the repurposing of an existing site and building for various commercial purposes. The site contains adequate infrastructure for the proposed use, including access, parking, and utilities. Furthermore, the use Conditions are included that will require the operation of the use to comply with the City's performance standards, including noise, and odor standards. APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00959— LYFE COMPANY, LLC August 31, 2016 Page 4 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project involves the repurposing of an existing, vacant building to allow for a food hall and gourmet market. It is not anticipated that the uses will create a nuisance or be a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare as the uses will operate within an enclosed area, will have sufficient parking and will be required to comply with conditions of approval to ensure the onsite and offsite safety and welfare of persons and improvements. This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,399 appeal fee. All City Planner's decisions will be posted to the City's website at www.CitvofRC.us/AdminAApprovedProlects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Dominick Perez at Dominick.Perez cit ofrc.us, or (909) 477-2750 extension 4315. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Candyce rnett City Planner CB:DPIjy Attachment: Conditions of Approval Conditions of Approval RANCHO ucshON cA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC201 5-01 1 87, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Deuartment Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval of Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950 is to allow for the modification of the exterior of an existing building of 85,000 square feet and to add a 20,325 square foot patio for property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 is to allow for the repurposing of a vacant building of 85,000 square feet and addition of an outdoor garden area to be used as a food hall, which shall include a gourmet market, thirty-four (34) food related spaces for food and food related retail sales, and art exhibit space on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 3. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187 is to allow for the operation of a grocery store of 20,500 square feet with a type 21 ABC license for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits and a type 87 ABC license for special event tasting (type 87) on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue — APN: 0208-622-27. 4. Approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00202 is to allow for a reduction of the amount of required parking by 20 percent for a proposed food hall use (Haven City Market) located at 8443 Haven Avenue—APN: 0208-622-27. 5. Prior to the installation of signage, a sign permit shall be approved by the Planning Department. All signage must be in compliance with the approved uniform sign program for the subject building located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 6. Restaurants with full liquor service and bars, where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages, shall obtain approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Restaurants without alcohol sales or with beer and wines sales do not require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 7. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. 8. Expansion of the use beyond that outlined in this letter and the Site Plan in the file requires Planning Director approval. 9. An approved City of Rancho Cucamonga business license shall be obtained by all onsite businesses prior to conducting business. 10. Any interior or exterior changes to the floor plan and/or building shall first be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department. 11. Per Section 17.104 of the Development Code, temporary outdoor events (outside of the outdoor garden area) shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Planning Department. 12. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music (including karaoke) or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless an Entertainment Permit been obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www CityofRC us Printed 8130/21716 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. Signs shall be posted in a prominent place at all exits of the premises, stating "No Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages Beyond This Point." 14. The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that no patron leaves the building or outdoor garden area with an open container of alcoholic beverage. 15. The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Services Department. 16. If operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to, noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, or if any of the Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled properly, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible suspension, modification, or revocation. Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 18. Copies of the signed Approval Letter with all Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 19. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 20. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 21. Existing heritage trees, as defined by Section 17.16.080 of the Development Code, that are proposed to be removed shall be subject to a Tree Removal Permit. The applicant shall submit a Tree Removal Permit with an arborist report, site plan, site photos and review fee to the Planning Department for review and approval. 22. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 23. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall confirm that the site contains a sufficient amount of trees through the parking lot. If the site is determined to be deficient, the applicant shall plant additional trees to be compliant with the Development Code. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityofRC us Printed 8130120 f 6 Page 2 0!b Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 27. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 28. All new parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 29. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 30. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 31. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. The design and placement of cart corrals shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place within the Building at the end of each workday. 32. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 33. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 8:00 a.m. until midnight, seven days a week. 34. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. For all new lighting fixtures, including, but not limited to, ground and wall mounted lights, details of the fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Furthermore, adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. 35. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." Printed 8130l2018 lwww CityofRC us Page 3 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 36. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 37. The design of the store front and site shall be consistent with the plans reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 15, 2016. 38. Decorative pavement shall be provided across the pedestrian walkway at the building storefront, and throughout the outdoor garden area. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 39. If additional trash receptacles are necessary, the location and design shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and shall incorporate the following design features: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally compatible overhead shade trellis. 40. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 41. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 42. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 43. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. www.CdyofRC us Printed B130l21718 Page 4 of 8 Project#. DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959_ DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy_ 45, All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.). 46. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program, The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The proposed project resembles a Mall as described by the CBC. Please design the building to comply with the Mall requirements in the current editions of the CBC and CFC for Chapter 4 special occupancies, Fire Alarm, mass evacuation, fire sprinklers, smoke removal, allowable area, mixed occupancy, fire walls, FD access, structural importance factor and proximity to other buildings. The applicant has provided a commitment letter indicating that the change of occupancy/ construction design plans will address all the requirements for mall buildings. Occupancy will not be granted until all the requirements of the change of occupancy have been met and accepted by the Building and Fire Inspection departments Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed 813012016 www CityofRC us page 5 a a Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 4. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 6. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 9. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed 8l mo% WWW CityofRC us Page 6 of 8 Project*: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit_ Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"information for Grading Plans and Permit". 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 13. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 14. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 15, Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 16. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility 1D Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 17. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www CityofRC us Printed fil30I2fJ1fi Pape 7 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradim_Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 19. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 20. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 24. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 25. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www.CityofRC.us Printed 813012016 Page 8 of 8 Mayor L.Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B.Kennedy Council Members William J.Alexander,Sam Spagnolo,Diane Williams City Manager John R.Gillison � ► I I 10500 Civic Center Drive I P.Q.Box 807 1 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729.0807 1909.477.2700 www.CityofRC.us April 4, 2018 Lyfe Company, LLC_ Attn: Tommy Ly 18414 Colima Road Rowland Heights, CA 91748 SUBJECT: [REVISED APPROVAL LETTER FOR) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015- 01187 — CC Chang —A request to obtain a Type 21 ABC License for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits and Type 86 ABC License for instructional tasting within a grocery store located within the Haven Avenue Overlay and Industrial Commercial Overlay of the Industrial Park District at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route at 8443 Haven Avenue — APN: 0208-622-27. Related Cases: Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959, Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198, Minor Exception DRC2016-00202, and Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2016-00402. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Dear Mr. Ly: This approval letter is a revised version of the original approval letter for Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187. The revised letter has been provided to correct unintentional errors regarding one of the types of ABC licenses that are the subject of the Conditional Use Permit. The license type was misidentified as Type 87. The correct license type is Type 86. The Conditional Use Permit process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves a proposal to establish a gourmet market that will include the sales and tasting of alcoholic beverages. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Planner has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-01187 LYFE COMPANY, LLC April 4, 2018 Page 2 Project Description: 1. The applicant proposes to repurpose a vacant building of 85,000 square feet to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an Outdoor garden area (Haven City Market). The subject building is within a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres located on the east side of Haven Avenue, and bound to the north and south by Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route. The center consists of seven (7) buildings - two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings. a multi-tenant retail building, and a vacant major tenant building (the subject building) that was previously occupied by JC Penney. 2. The floor plan indicates the interior of the building will contain thirty-four (34) food-related tenant spaces (about 59,000 square feet), a gourmet farmers market (20,500 square feet), and an art gallery (5:619 square feet)_ Most of the tenant spaces will only be accessible from the interior of the building. The storefront tenants along the west side of the building will be directly accessible from the exterior of the building. The art gallery will be located within a mezzanine area that will be accessible via a semi-circular staircase and ADA-compliant elevator. 3. This application involves a proposal to sell alcoholic beverages and conduct tasting (Type 21 and 86) within the gourmet food market. 4. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, with the western portion of the parcel, including a majority of the parking area, in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD) and the eastern half of the parcel, including the building and future garden area, in the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) at 8443 Haven Avenue. The Development Code allows for alcoholic beverage sales within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 5. Since the site is located within an over-concentrated census tract (21.1), the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control required approval of a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2016-00402), which was approved by the City Council on June 15, 2016. 6. Future tenants of the Haven City Market that apply for on-sale and off-sale alcohol licenses will be required to obtain land use approval by the Planning Department and may be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. 7. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950 to modify the exterior elevations of the subject building and to add an outdoor garden area; Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 to repurpose a vacant 85,000-square foot building to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor garden area (Haven City Market); Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198 to allow for changes to an existing sign program to accommodate future tenants of Haven City Market; and Minor Exception DRC2016-00202 to allow for a reduction of required parking spaces. 8. The hours of operation of Haven City Market will be 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily. All tenants will be opening and closing at the same time. The hours of the outdoor garden area will also be 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Haven City Market is anticipated to be open 365 days a year. 9. The request for a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00202) is to reduce the amount of required APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC201 5-01 1 87— LYFE COMPANY, LLC April 4, 2018 Page 3 parking spaces by less than 25 percent. The Development Code requires a total of 1,155 parking spaces be provided with the incorporation of the subject project. However, the site only contains a total of 924 parking spaces, which is 20 percent less than the required amount. Section 17.16.110 within the Development Code states that an exception may be granted for a reduction of up to 25 percent of the required parking spaces. Kunzman and Associates, Inc. prepared a parking study for the site and found that there will be sufficient parking for the proposed use. The study indicates that site visits were conducted on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Friday, March 13, 2015 and Saturday, March 14, 2015. Based on the site visits, Kunzman and Associates, Inc. found that the parking lot was most impacted on Friday between 10:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. At that time, there were 234 parking spaces being used. The study also indicates the Haven City Market requires 631 parking spaces to be provided. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed use will not negatively impact the onsite parking as it is expected that no more than 865 parking spaces of the existing 924 onsite parking spaces will be used (234 for existing uses and 631 for proposed Haven City Market). 10. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on April 5, 2016. No major issues were raised at this meeting; however, secondary and policy issues were discussed involving the proposed Uniform Sign Program Modification, walls and landscape requirements. The Committee agreed with staffs recommendations and recommended approval of this project. 11. Notice of Application was sent on April 18, 2016 to all property owners within 660 feet of the site. Staff received one inquiry within the 10-day comment period from a neighboring property owner/tenant. The tenant/owner ultimately wanted to know the type of uses that were being proposed. Staff informed him of the retail and food uses and no concerns were raised. Findings of Approval: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/ standards. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD) and industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The Development Code allows for retail alcohol sales within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project involves the repurposing of an existing site and building for various commercial purposes, including the operation of a gourmet market that will sell alcohol for offsite consumption. The site contains adequate infrastructure for the proposed use, including access, parking, and utilities. Furthermore, the use Conditions are included that will require the operation of the use to comply with the City's performance standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project involves the sales of alcoholic beverages from the gourmet market. It is not anticipated that the uses will create a nuisance or be a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare as the uses will operate within an enclosed area. Furthermore, the use will have sufficient parking and will be required to comply with APPROVAL LETTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-01187—LYFE COMPANY, LLC April 4, 2018 Page 4 conditions of approval to ensure the onsite and offsite safety and welfare of persons and improvements. This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,432 appeal fee. All City Planner decisions will be posted to the City's website at www.CityofRC.us/AdminApprovedPromects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Dominick Perez at Dominick.Perez(cDcitvofrc.us, or (909)477-2750 extension 4315. Sincerely, PLANNIN PARTMENT r Candyce Burn City Planner CB:DPIjy Attachment: Conditions of Approval Conditions of Approval RANCHOCUCAMON GA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2015-01187 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following special Conditions 1. Approval of Minor Design Review ❑RC2015-00950 is to allow for the modification of the exterior of an existing building of 85,000 square feet and to add a 20,325 square foot patio for property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 is to allow for the repurposing of a vacant building of 85,000 square feet and addition of an outdoor garden area to be used as a food hall, which shall include a gourmet market, thirty-four (34) food related spaces for food and food related retail sales, and art exhibit space on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 3. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187 is to allow for the operation of a grocery store of 20,500 square feet with a Type 21 ABC License for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits and a Type 86 ABC License for instructional tasting on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue — APN: 0208-622-27. 4. Approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00202 is to allow for a reduction of the amount of required parking by 20 percent for a proposed food hall use (Haven City Market) located at 8443 Haven Avenue—APN: 0208-622-27. 5. Prior to the installation of signage, a sign permit shall be approved by the Planning Department. All signage must be in compliance with the approved uniform sign program for the subject building located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 6. Restaurants with full liquor service and bars, where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages, shall obtain approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Restaurants without alcohol sales or with beer and wines sales do not require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 7. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. 8. Expansion of the use beyond that outlined in this letter and the Site Plan in the file requires Planning Director approval. 9. An approved City of Rancho Cucamonga business license shall be obtained by all onsite businesses prior to conducting business. 10. Any interior or exterior changes to the floor plan and/or building shall first be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department. 11. Per Section 17.104 of the Development Code, temporary outdoor events (outside of the outdoor garden area)shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Planning Department. 12. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music (including karaoke) or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless an Entertainment Permit been obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www Cityo(RC.us Printed 41212018 Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. Signs shall be posted in a prominent place at all exits of the premises, stating "No Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages Beyond This Point." 14. The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that no patron leaves the building or outdoor garden area with an open container of alcoholic beverage. 15. The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Services Department. 16. If operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to, noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, or if any of the Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled properly, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible suspension, modification, or revocation. Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 18. Copies of the signed Approval Letter with all Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 19. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50,00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 20. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 21. Existing heritage trees, as defined by Section 17.16.080 of the Development Code, that are proposed to be removed shall be subject to a Tree Removal Permit. The applicant shall submit a Tree Removal Permit with an arborist report, site plan, site photos and review fee to the Planning Department for review and approval. 22. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 23. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall confirm that the site contains a sufficient amount of trees through the parking lot. If the site is determined to be deficient, the applicant shall plant additional trees to be compliant with the Development Code. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www C-tyofRC us Printed 4f2l2018 pay„2 ci B Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninci De artment Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 27. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82_ 28. All new parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 29. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 30. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 31. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. The design and placement of cart corrals shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place within the Building at the end of each workday. 32. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 33. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 8:00 a.m. until midnight, seven days a week. 34. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. For all new lighting fixtures, including, but not limited to, ground and wall mounted lights, details of the fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Furthermore, adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. 35. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." www.CityofRC.us Printed 4.712t}18 Page 3 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 36. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m, until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 37. The design of the store front and site shall be consistent with the plans reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 15, 2016. 38. Decorative pavement shall be provided across the pedestrian walkway at the building storefront, and throughout the outdoor garden area. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 39. If additional trash receptacles are necessary, the location and design shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and shall incorporate the following design features: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors_ c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f.Architecturally compatible overhead shade trellis, 40. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 41. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 42. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fie in the Planning Departmentr the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations, 43. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, andlor landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. Printed 4C1J2gt8 www CityofRC us page 4 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planninci Department Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 45. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.). 46. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. En-gineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The proposed project resembles a Mall as described by the CBC. Please design the building to comply with the Mall requirements in the current editions of the CBC and CFC for Chapter 4 special occupancies, Fire Alarm, mass evacuation, fire sprinklers, smoke removal, allowable area, mixed occupancy, fire walls, FD access, structural importance factor and proximity to other buildings. The applicant has provided a commitment letter indicating that the change of occupancy/ construction design plans will address all the requirements for mall buildings. Occupancy will not be granted until all the requirements of the change of occupancy have been met and accepted by the Building and Fire Inspection departments Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval www Cityo(RC us Printed 41212018 Page 5 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gradina Section Standard Conditlons of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 4. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 6. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 7, Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code_ 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 9. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed 4/2/2018 www CityofRC us page 6 of B Project#: DRC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 13. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 14. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 15. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 16. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 17. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed:4212018 www CityofRC us page 7 of 5 Project#: ORC2015-00950 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structuralltreatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 19. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 20. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-speck water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet's located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 24. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 25. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www CityofRC us Printed 412124t8 Page 8 of 8 Mayor L.Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo Council Members William J,Alexander,Lynne Kennedy,Diane Williams City Manager John R.Gillison RANCHOCITY OF a a 10500 Civic Center Drive I P.O.Box 807 ' Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807 1909,477,2700 1 www.CityofRC.us August 31, 2016 Lyfe Company, LLC. Attn: Tommy Ly 18414 Colima Road Rowland Heights, CA 91748 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00202 — LYFE COMPANY, LLC - A request to reduce the amount of required parking spaces by less than 25% for a proposed food hall, gourmet market, and retail space located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route at 8443 Haven Avenue — APN: 0208-622-27. Related Cases: Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187, Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198, and Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2016-00402. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Dear Mr. Ly: The Minor Exception review process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is a Minor Exception for reduction in parking to allow for the operation of a proposed food hall, gourmet market, and retail space of 85,000 square feet. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Further, the project will include the addition of a 20,325 square foot outdoor patio area. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Planner has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. Project Description: 1. The applicant proposes to repurpose a vacant building of 85,000 square feet to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor garden area (Haven City Market). The subject building is within a commercialloffice center of about 17.65 acres located on the east side of Haven Avenue, and bound to the north and south by Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route. The center consists of seven (7) buildings - two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings, a multi-tenant retail building, and a vacant major tenant building (the subject building) that was previously occupied by JC Penney. APPROVAL LETTER MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00202— LYFE COMPANY, LLC August 31, 2016 Page 2 2. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, with the western portion of the parcel, including a majority of the parking area, in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD) and the eastern half of the parcel, including the building and future garden area, in the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) at 8443 Haven Avenue. 3. This application is to reduce the amount of required parking spaces by less than 25%. The Development Code requires a total of 1,155 parking spaces be provided with the incorporation of the subject project. However, the site only contains a total of 924 parking spaces, which is 20% less than the required amount. Section 17.16.110 within the Development Code states that an exception may be granted for a reduction of up to 25% of the required parking spaces. Kunzman and Associates, Inc. prepared a parking study for the site and found that there will be sufficient parking for the proposed use. The study indicates that site visits were conducted on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Friday, March 13, 2015 and Saturday, March 14, 2015. Based on the site visits, Kunzman and Associates, Inc. found that the parking lot was most impacted on Friday between 10:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. At that time, there were 234 parking spaces being used. The study also indicates the Haven City Market requires 631 parking spaces to be provided. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed use will not negatively impact the onsite parking as it is expected that no more than 865 parking spaces of the existing 924 onsite parking spaces will be used (234 for existing uses and 631 for proposed Haven City Market). 4. Vehicular access to the site is granted via drive entrances along Arrow Route, Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive. 5. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950 to modify the exterior elevations of the subject building and to add an outdoor garden area; Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 to repurpose a vacant 85,000 square foot building to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor garden area (Haven City Market); Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187 to allow for alcoholic beverage sales and tasting (Type 21 and 86) within a gourmet food market (HK2 Food District); Uniform Sign Program Modification DRC2015-01198 to allow for changes to an existing sign program to accommodate future tenants of Haven City Market; and Public Convenience or Necessity to allow for retail alcohol sales within an over-concentrated census tract. 6. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on April 5, 2016. No major issues were raised at this meeting; however, secondary and policy items were discussed involving the proposed Uniform Sign Program Modification, walls and landscape requirements. The Committee agreed with staffs recommendations and recommended approval of this project. 7. Notice of the application was sent on March 21, 2016 to all property owners within 660 feet of the site. Staff did not receive any responses regarding this application within the 10-day comment period from anyone notified. Findings of Approval: 1. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages the establishment of commercial-serving uses that meet the needs of residents. The project involves the establishment of a food hall, comprised of food tenants, a retail gourmet APPROVAL LETTER MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00202—LYFE COMPANY, LLC August 31, 2016 Page 3 market, and art gallery, which is anticipated to provide a needed service to residents and employees within the City. 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Haven City Market is located within a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres. The center contains multiple office buildings as well as several food and service businesses. The proposed food and market uses are compatible with the existing businesses within and around the subject commercial/office center, and residences located to the west, across Haven Avenue, as it will provide grocery and dining needs. 3. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The site contains 924 parking spaces. However, the Development Code requires a total of 1,155 parking spaces be provided with the incorporation of the subject project. Kunzman and Associates, Inc. were hired by the Applicant to prepare a parking study for the site (on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Friday, March 13, 2015 and Saturday, March 14, 2015) and found that there will be sufficient parking for the proposed use. 4. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Minor Exceptions have consistently been allowed in various commercial and industrial districts, such as this site, where the applicant has provided a professionally prepared parking study that has shown onsite parking will not be effected by a new use or site modification. Staff determined that no special privilege was granted for this project. This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,399 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Dominick Perez at Dominick.PerezCaD-cityofrc.us, or (909) 477-2750 extension 4315. Sincerely, PLANNINA DEPARTMENT Candyce urnett City Planner CB:DP/jy Attachment: Conditions of Approval Conditions of Approval RANCHO cA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following special Conditions 1. Approval of Minor Design Review DRC2015-00950 is to allow for the modification of the exterior of an existing building of 85,000 square feet and to add a 20,325 square foot patio for property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27, 2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 is to allow for the repurposing of a vacant building of 85,000 square feet and addition of an outdoor garden area to be used as a food hall, which shall include a gourmet market, thirty-four (34) food related spaces for food and food related retail sales, and art exhibit space on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 3. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01187 is to allow for the operation of a grocery store of 20,500 square feet with a type 21 ABC license for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits and a type 87 ABC license for special event tasting (type 87) on property located at 8443 Haven Avenue — APN: 0208-622-27. 4. Approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00202 is to allow for a reduction of the amount of required parking by 20 percent for a proposed food hall use (Haven City Market) located at 8443 Haven Avenue—APN: 0208-622-27. 5. Prior to the installation of signage, a sign permit shall be approved by the Planning Department. All signage must be in compliance with the approved uniform sign program for the subject building located at 8443 Haven Avenue-APN: 0208-622-27. 6. Restaurants with full liquor service and bars, where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages, shall obtain approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Restaurants without alcohol sales or with beer and wines sales do not require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 7. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. 8. Expansion of the use beyond that outlined in this letter and the Site Plan in the file requires Planning Director approval. 9. An approved City of Rancho Cucamonga business license shall be obtained by all onsite businesses prior to conducting business. 10. Any interior or exterior changes to the floor plan and/or building shall first be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department. 11. Per Section 17.104 of the Development Code, temporary outdoor events (outside of the outdoor garden area) shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Planning Department. 12. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music (including karaoke) or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless an Entertainment Permit been obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www CityofRc.us Pnnted 8l30l2016 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. Signs shall be posted in a prominent place at all exits of the premises, stating "No Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages Beyond This Point." 14. The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that no patron leaves the building or outdoor garden area with an open container of alcoholic beverage. 15. The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Services Department. 16. If operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to, noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, or if any of the Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled properly, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible suspension, modification, or revocation. Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 18. Copies of the signed Approval Letter with all Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 19. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 20. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 21. Existing heritage trees, as defined by Section 17.16.080 of the Development Code, that are proposed to be removed shall be subject to a Tree Removal Permit. The applicant shall submit a Tree Removal Permit with an arborist report, site plan. site photos and review fee to the Planning Department for review and approval. 22. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 23. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall confirm that the site contains a sufficient amount of trees through the parking lot. If the site is determined to be deficient, the applicant shall plant additional trees to be compliant with the Development Code. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www CilyolRC.us Printed 8130I2016 Page 2 of a Project*: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 27. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 28. All new parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 29. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 30. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 31. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. The design and placement of cart corrals shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place within the Building at the end of each workday. 32. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 33. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 8:00 a.m. until midnight, seven days a week. 34. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. For all new lighting fixtures, including, but not limited to, ground and wall mounted lights, details of the fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Furthermore, adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. 35. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." Www Cityoti�C.uS Printed 8130l2016 Page 3 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 36. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 37. The design of the store front and site shall be consistent with the plans reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 15, 2016. 38. Decorative pavement shall be provided across the pedestrian walkway at the building storefront, and throughout the outdoor garden area. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 39. If additional trash receptacles are necessary, the location and design shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and shall incorporate the following design features: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally compatible overhead shade trellis. 40. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 41. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 42. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 43. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. www CityofRC us printed t3l31}l201fi Page 4 of Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 45. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.). 46. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The proposed project resembles a Mall as described by the CBC. Please design the building to comply with the Mall requirements in the current editions of the CBC and CFC for Chapter 4 special occupancies, Fire Alarm, mass evacuation, fire sprinklers, smoke removal, allowable area, mixed occupancy, fire walls, FD access, structural importance factor and proximity to other buildings. The applicant has provided a commitment letter indicating that the change of occupancy/ construction design plans will address all the requirements for mall buildings. Occupancy will not be granted until all the requirements of the change of occupancy have been met and accepted by the Building and Fire Inspection departments Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval www CityofRC us Printed 8/30/2016 Page 5 of 8 Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC201 5-01 1 98, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 4. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 6. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 9. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.C4ofRC us PRnted 8l30l2016 Page 6 of B Project#: DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 13. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 14. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 15. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 16. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 17. If the depths of the infiltration pits, underground chambers, rock pits or similar device is greater than its width land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.us ?rioted:8I3012076 Page 7 of 8 Project M DRC2015-00950 DRC2015-00959, DRC2015-01187, DRC2015-01198, DRC2016-00202 Project Name: Haven City Market Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Uniform Sign Program Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 19. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 20. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 24. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 25. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www.C1tyolRC.us Printed 8I3012016 Page 8 of 8 Mayor L.Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tern Lynne B.Kennedy Council Members William J.Alexander,Sam Spagnolo,Diane Williams City Manager John R.Gillison CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive I P.Q,Box 807 1 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807 1909.477.2700 1 www.CityofRC.us February 20, 2018 Native Son Alehouse Attn: Jon Sanchez 305 E. 4th St., Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00023 — NATIVE SON ALEHOUSE: A request to operate a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license to allow for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits within a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space located within the Industrial Park(IP) District, Haven Avenue Overlay, and Industrial Commercial Overlay at 8443 Haven Avenue (Haven City Market) — APN: 0208-622-27 Dear Mr. Sanchez, The Conditional Use Permit process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities, which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves the operation of a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits within a previously entitled space (Haven City Market). Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. Project Description: 1. The applicant, Native Son Alehouse, is requesting to operate a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits within a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Avenue Overlay, and Industrial Commercial Overlay at 8443 Haven Avenue (Haven City Market). 2. Section 17.30 and 17.32 of the Development Code states that alcoholic beverage sales may be permitted within the Industrial Park (lP) District when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, prior to the commencement of any alcoholic beverage sales, a Conditional Use Permit must be approved by the Planning Director, 3. On August 31, 2016, the Planning Director approved a request to repurpose a vacant building of 85,000 square feet to be used as a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space with an outdoor APPROVAL LETTER FOR NATIVE SON ALEHOUSE DRC2017-00023— NATIVE SON ALEHOUSE February 20, 2018 Page 2 garden area (Haven City Market). Native Son Alehouse is a use that is consistent with the envisioned tenant mix for the Haven City Market. 4. On August 31, 2016, the Planning Director approved a minor exception to reduce the amount of required parking by less than 25%for the Haven City Market. Currently there are 924 parking spaces provided for all uses and tenants within the Haven City Market, which include Native Son Alehouse. Vehicular access to the site is granted via drive entrances along Arrow Route, Haven Avenue, and Civic Center Drive. 5. Native Son Alehouse will be located in a tenant space at the southeast corner of the Haven City Market, and will comprise of a front"beer bar"with counter seating and a rear"craft cocktail bar" accessible from a 40-foot long hallway from the front"beer bar."The rear"craft cocktail bar" will feature counter seating, booths, and an outdoor patio. Both areas will serve food along with alcohol, and will be non-age-restricted.The business will have a total floor area of approximately 1,660 square feet, which includes the 396-square foot outdoor patio. 6. The front "beer bar" will operate between the hours of 11:00 a.m. to midnight, 7 days a week. The rear "craft cocktail bar" will operate between the hours of 5:00 p.m. to midnight, 7 days a week. The business plans to employ 20 to 30 employees, with 4-5 employees on staff for each bar area during peak operating times. 7. The Development Code requires all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the subject property be notified for all Conditional Use Permit applications. The required notification was sent out on December 11, 2017. Planning staff did not receive any phone calls or any other correspondence within the 10-day comment period. Findings of Approval: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards.The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Avenue Overlay and Industrial Commercial Overlay. The Development Code allows for retail alcohol sales within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project involves a request to operate a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits within a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space (Haven City Market). The site contains adequate infrastructure for the proposed use, including access, parking, and utilities. Furthermore, the use Conditions are included that will require the operation of the use to comply with the City's performance standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project involves the sale of alcoholic beverages within a tenant space in a previously entitled food hall, gourmet market, and retail space (Haven City Market). It is not anticipated that the use will create a nuisance or be a detriment to the public health, safety or welfare as the use will operate within an enclosed area. Furthermore, a Condition of Approval APPROVAL LETTER FOR NATIVE SON ALEHOUSE DRC2017-00023— NATIVE SON ALEHOUSE February 20, 2018 Page 3 has been included that states"should the business create negative impacts, then the conditional use permit may be brought back to the Planning Director for modification or revocation_': This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,432 appeal fee. All Planning Director approvals of Conditional Use Permits will be posted to the City's website at www.CityofRC.us/AdminApprovedProiects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Vincent Acuna, Assistant Planner by phone at (909) 477-2750 extension 4323 or by email at: vincent.acuna@cityofrc.us. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Candy Burnett City Planner CB:VAIjy Attachment: Conditions of Approval ri Conditions of Approval UA'CHO CAMONG A Community Development Department Project#: DRC2017-00023 Project Name: Haven City Market- Native Son Ale House Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is hereby granted for Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00023, the request to operate a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits within a food hall, gourmet market, and retail space (Haven City Market) at 8443 Haven Avenue. The restaurant measures 1,270 square feet, with a 396 square foot outdoor patio. 2. Any modification or intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by the original Conditional Use Permit (DRC2017-00023) shall require review and approval by the Planning Director. Revisions to the hours of operation, request to operate an ABC license other than a Type 47, change in operation of the activities/operations as stated in this Approval Letter and Conditions of Approval are subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. 3. Alcoholic beverages shall be sold and served in containers that are distinctive in design and color and are easily distinguishable from containers used in the service of non-alcoholic beverages. 4. There shall be no promotions encouraging intoxication or drinking contests or advertisements indicating `Buy one drink, get one free," "Two for the price of one," or "All you can drink for...." or similar language. 5. Oversized containers or pitchers containing in excess of 25 ounces of an alcoholic drink shall not be sold to a single patron for their sole consumption. 6. Employees and contract security personnel shall not consume any alcoholic beverages during their work shift. 7. The quarterly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of food during the same period. The licensee shall at all times maintain records which reflect separately the gross sales of food and the gross sales of alcoholic beverages of the licensed business. Said records shall be kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department or employee designated by the Rancho Cucamonga Police, City of Rancho Cucamonga and/or Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control on demand. 8. Full and complete meals must be offered and made available at all times the premises is exercising the privileges of its alcoholic beverage license, with the exception of the last '/2 hour of operation each day. 9. During hours of operation, the premises shall be designed and used for and must possess the necessary utensils, table service, and condiment dispensers to serve meals to the public. 10. At each public entrance/exit to or from the patio, which leads to an unlicensed adjacent property, there shall be clearly marked signs stating, "REMOVAL OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FROM PATIO AREA IS PROHIBITED." www.CityoiRC.us Printed 2/1412018 Project M DRC2017-00023 Project Name: Haven City Market-Native Son Ale House Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE -020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planninu Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 11. A file containing the names and dates of employment of every person serving alcoholic beverages for consumption by patrons on the licensed premises and every manager shall be kept on the premises. The file shall also include a copy of each person's certificate of completion of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control L.E.A.D. course (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs)or equivalent. 12. All fake ID's will be confiscated and turned in to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, within a timely manner, not to exceed a 30-day period. 13. A minimum of eight (8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in a combination of interior and exterior of the business, with the intent to capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business. The placement and exact number of cameras shall be determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (San Bernardino County Sheriff) prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. The applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security camera prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 14. Video recordings of surveillance cameras shall be nothing less than NTSC (National Television System Committee, the NTSC is the analog video color format used to broadcast television signals) standards, with a minimum of 1080p resolution. A minimum of 90 days surveillance video shall be kept and relinquished upon request by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, or a designated agent. The applicant(s) or on-site manager(s) shall maintain the recording system and cameras in working condition. 15. Entertainment as defined by RCMC Section 17.20.020 is not included as part of this permit. An entertainment permit shall be applied for, and approved by the Planning Commission prior to any on-site entertainment. 16. Owner/ manager shall be responsible for all vendors to obtain a valid City of Rancho Cucamonga Business License. 17. An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department or employee designated by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased or rented by the licensee. The log shall indicate date, time, description of incident, staff involved/ witnesses, what action taken, police notification if reported, and report number. 18. The applicant shall be required to obtain all necessary permits, approvals, and licenses from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 19. The applicant shall be required to obtain all necessary permits, approvals, and licenses from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 20. Should the business create negative impacts, the conditional use permit may be brought back to the Planning Director for modification or revocation. www.Q1yofRC.us Printed 211412018 Page 2 of 4 Project#: DRC2017-00023 Project Name: Haven City Market- Native Son Ale House Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 21. The business shall comply with the approved uniform sign program for the Haven City Market. 22. Hours of operation shall be restricted to the operating hours for the Haven City Market, which was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959. 23. All applicable conditions of approval specified in Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 relating to the approval of the Haven City Market shall remain in full force and effect. Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 25. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 26. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 27. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 28. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed EngineerlArchitect. 29. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 30. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 31.Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Building and Safety Services Department www.CityofRc.us Printed 211412018 Page 3 of 4 Project#: DRC2017-00023 Project Name: Haven City Market- Native Son Ale House Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE-020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations (if needed). A full set of tenant improvement plans (including electrical, mechanical, plumbing, T-24 calculations, fully dimensioned floor plan, ceiling plan, occupant load count and an approval letter from Haven City Marketplace Leasing Management) will be required as a submittal with the building permit application. The documents must be submitted to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The tenant improvement will require separate permits for fire sprinkler and fire alarm alterations per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Printed:2I14M18 www-Cityo(RC.us page 4 of 4 June 18, 2020 Andrew Chow 8443 Haven Avenue, Suite 107 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00081 — A request to operate an indoor cycling studio in a 1,750 square foot tenant space located in the northwest corner of Haven City Market. The subject property is at 8443 Haven Avenue which is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District and the Industrial Commercial Overlay (ICO); APN:0208-622-27. Dear Mr. Chow The Conditional Use Permit review process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Departments staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guideline Section 15301- Existing Facilities, as the project involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. The project scope involves the establishment of a conditionally permitted land use in an existing multitenant commercial center. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Planner has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. Project Description: 1. Business Operations: Hours of operation are 6:00am to 10:00pm Sunday- Saturday. Classes are scheduled at least 15 minutes apart to allow for employees to clean equipment and for customers to adjust their bikes prior to class. A sample class schedule is included as an attachment. A maximum of thirty-three (33) people can cycle at one time. A minimum of one employee will be on site during operating hours. EPICycle offers complimentary towels, cycling shoes and a shower facility. Branded clothing is available for sale. 2. Site Background: EPICycle is a 1,750 square foot storefront in the Haven City Market building. Haven City Market is a re-purposed 85,000 square foot building (formerly J.C. Penny's) to include retail storefronts, a gourmet market and food hall. The primary related records for land use decisions include Minor Design Review DRC2015- 00950, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00202. APPROVAL LETTER FOR EPICYCLE DRC2020-00081 —ANDREW CHOW June 18, 2020 Page 2 3 Parking: The 2016 Kunzman Associates, Inc. Parking study findings supported a twenty percent reduction in the required on-site parking for Haven City Market per RCDC Section 17.64.050 (Table 17.64.050-1) Planning Director Burnett approved the minor exception request which permitted the use of the existing 924 parking spaces to meet project parking demand (without the minor exception 1,155 spaces would have been required). Study authors parked the EPICycle tenant space at a restaurant standard 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The most accurate classification of EPICycle in the Table 17.64.050-1 "Parking Requirements by Land Use" is "health clubs and other fitness related facilities" which is parked at 5 per 1,000 square feet. Since the parking study evaluated the space with a twice as strict standard, the parking needs for EPICycle are addressed. Furthermore. the owners anticipate higher levels of class attendance are expected in the early morning and later evening: as is a common trend in fitness centric land uses. 4. Public Comment: In accordance with RCDC Section 17.16.025 staff mailed notices of application to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. These notices were mailed on May 27, 2020. Staff did not receive any public comments about the project. Findings of Approyal: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/ standards. The subject property is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District and the Industrial Commercial (IC) Overlay District. EPICycle Studio offers indoor bicycling classes with 33 stationary bikes in a 1,750 square foot space. EPICycle Studio is an "Indoor Fitness and Sports facility. small" as it is "an establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet." (RCDC Section 17.32.020(C)(9)), this land use is conditionally permitted in the IC (RCDC Section 17.38.050(Table 17.38.050-1)). The General Plan land use designation is General Commercial (GC), which permits the existing commercial multi-tenant commercial center. Supporting the creation of high-quality business options for residents is a reoccurring theme of the General Plan. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density. and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. An exit analysis was completed to the satisfaction the Fire Marshall. As described above in project detail #2-3 staff reviewed the existing development of the site and found the indoor cycle studio to be a suitable land use. The site contains adequate infrastructure for the proposed use including access. parking and utilities. Operating in compliance with the City's performance standards is a condition of approval 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. All exercise activities are limited to the interior of the tenant space. The land use has sufficient parking and associated infrastructure. APPROVAL LETTER FOR EPICYCLE DRC2020-00081 — ANDREW CHOW June 18, 2020 Page 3 This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal. and be accompanied by a $1,637 appeal fee. All City Planner approvals of Conditional Use Permits will be posted to the City's website at www.City fRC.us/AdminApprovedProiects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Griffin Sproul, Planning Technician by phone at (909) 477-2750, extension 4309 or by email at, griffin.sproul@cityofrc.us. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT f A L ne McIntosh, AICP Planning Director Attachment: Conditions of Approval Class Schedule Previous Minor Exception DRC2016-002002 Conditions of Approval LM RANCHO Community Development Department CUC AMONCA Project#; DRC2020-00081 Project Name: EDR - EPICycle Studios Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Changes in operations and/or site development may require a Conditional Use Permit Modification or other entitlements at the discretion of the Planning Director or her designee. Contact the Planning Department prior to making any changes. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees. because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 6:00 am until 10:00 pm. The last class will end by 10:00 pm wwwCilyofRC.us Printed 6/11/2020 Project#: DRC2020-00081 Project Name: EDR - EPICycle Studios Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and 1 or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering 1 Environmental Programs 1 Construction & Demolition Diversion Program, Fire Prevention 1 New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, Keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 2. Fire are extinguishers required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult 9 with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. 3. Business is approved for 33 cycles as shown and indicated on the plans and occupant load table. The addition of more cycles or a change in equipment from cycles to another fitness product or machine will require review and approval by the Fire District and the Building Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:611 1 12 0 2 0 Page 2 of 3 Project#: DRC2020-00081 Project Name: EDR - EPICycle Studios Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including T-24 energy calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. Modifications to the fire sprinklers are required to be a separate submittal/permit. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. www_CityofRC-Lis Printed:5/1112020 Page 3 of 3 X J I- E August 31, 2020 Maybelle Charm Guevarra SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00210 which involves the establishment of a 1,985 square foot indoor amusement/entertainment facility at 8443 Haven Avenue Suite 109 which is located within the industrial Park (IP) District and the Industrial Commercial Overlay (IGO); APN: 0208-622-27, Dear Maybelle Charm Guevarra: The Conditional Use Permit Review DRC2020-00210 process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Environmental Determination: 1. Prior to any action being taken for this request, the Planning Departments staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guideline Section 15301- Existing Facilities, which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project scope involves the establishment of a conditionally permitted land use in an existing multitenant commercial center. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Planner has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. Project Description: 1. Business Operations: Created! is an indoor amusementientertainment facility within a 1,985 square foot tenant space located on the west side of the Haven City Market Building at 8443 Haven Avenue. Hours are 9:00am — 7:00pm daily. Created! offers a weekly schedule of themed children's play activities based on age group. In between activity classes are open play periods where children can use indoor play sets while parents watch. Club members can book private parties by reservation. 2. Site History: The Haven City Market building is an 85,000 square foot repurposed building (formerly J.C. Penny's), which was designed to house a food hall, retail storefronts and a gourmet market under Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00959, Minor Design Review DRC2015-00959 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00202, 3. Parking: The 2016 Kunzman Associates, Inc. Parking study findings supported a twenty percent reduction in the required on-site parking for Haven City Market per RCDC Section 17.64.050 (Table 17.64.050-1). Planning Director Burnett approved the minor exception Rev 12-17 APPROVAL LETTER FOR CREATED DRC2020-00210 —MAYBELLE CHARM GUEVARRA August 31, 2020 Page 2 request which permitted the use of the existing 924 parking spaces to meet project parking demand (without the minor exception 1,155 spaces would have been required). Study authors parked the Created tenant space at a high turnover restaurant standard of 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Table. 17.64.050-1 "Parking Requirements by Land Use" does not separately identify a standard for an indoor amusement/entertainment facility land use. The strictest potentially applicable shopping center standard is 5 per 1,000 square feet. Since the parking study evaluated -the space with a twice as strict standard, the parking needs for Created have been addressed. 4. Public Comment: In accordance with RCDC Section 17.16.025 staff mailed notices of application to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. These notices were mailed on July 15, 2020. Staff did not receive any,public comments about the project. Findings of Approval: 1'. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/ standards. Created! is classified as an "Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility" under RCDC 17.32.020(C)7. Land uses of this type include "establishments providing amusement and entertainment services in an indoor facility for a fee or admission charge, including, but not limited to, dance halls, ballrooms, bowling alleys, Iaser,tag,.inflatable playgrounds, trampoline parks, escape room venues and electronic game arcades, as primary uses." Created! customers pay to use facility equipment (various indoor play structures and play sets) and participate in programed entertainment activities. Customers can pay for amusement activities or use of facility equipment per use as an.admission fee or on a membership basis. The space will be rented out for private parties. Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility is an allowed land use in the Industrial Commercial Overlay (1CO) District with the approval of conditional use permit. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet alf related performance criteria and development standards. The site contains adequate infrastructure for the proposed use including access, parking and utilities. Operating in compliance with the city performance standards is a condition of approval. 3. Granting the .permit would not 'be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. All activities are limited to the interior of the tenant space. The land use has sufficient parking and.associated infrastructure. This project is approved subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. Rev 12-17 APPROVAL LETTER FOR CREATED DRC2020-00210 -- MAYBELLE CHARM GUEVARRA August 31, 2020 Page 3 This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,685 appeal fee. All City Planner approvals of Conditional Use Permits will be posted to the City's website at www.CitvofRC.us/AdminApprovedProjects. Decisions will be posted for a minimum of 30 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Griffin Sproul Planning Technician by phone at (909) 477-2750 extension 4309 or by email at: griffin.sproul@cityofrc.us Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Anne McIntosh, AICP Planning Director AM:elt Attachment: Conditions of Approval Site Plan & Floor Plan Business Operations Statement Rev 12-17 Conditions of Approval RANCHO Community Development Department CUCA MONGA Project#: DRC2020-00210 Project Name: EDR - Created Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City. Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval. and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. AEI checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approva{. 5. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other mod ificationslintensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shalt require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. www.CityofRC.us Printed W1312020 Project#: DRC2020-00210 Project Name: EDR- Created Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. All operations and. businesses shall be conducted- to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m.. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein,. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. Enaineeringg Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. ** CD Information'Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion ,Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from -landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall I Engineering /Environmental Programs I Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. Fire Prevention 1 New Construction Unit Standard Conditions:of'Approval 1. Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. A fire alarm system is required to be installed in addition to the existing-fire sprinkler monitoring system. 2. Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 3. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit..Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 4. Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Printed:81012020 www.QtyofRC.us Page 2 of 3 Project*: DRC2020-00210 Project Name: EDR-Created Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE- 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. 6. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the build inglsuitelunit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 7. A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including T-24 energy calculations and structural calculations (where required) to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. Modifications to the automatic fire sprinkler system is required to be a separate submittal/permit. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. Play equipment shall comply with the provisions in the California Building Code for allowable size, location, and flame and smoke spread. If there is any plumbing work on your plans please contact CVWD ASAP (Local water district), their turnaround timeline is 4-6 weeks to grant a plumbing first release. A "Plumbing First Release" is required before B&S issues a demolition or Tl permit when there is plumbing involved. www.CityofRC.us Printed:811 312 02 0 Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 21-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2021-00149, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH INDOOR AND OUTDOOR, TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT USES AT AN EXISTING FOOD HALL—HAVEN CITY MARKET, LOCATED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8443 HAVEN AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0208- 622-27 A. Recitals. 1. Tommy Ly, owner of Lyfe Company, LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11t" day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8443 Haven Avenue; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Commercial Center Industrial Park Industrial Park District',2 North City of Rancho Cucamonga City Industrial Park Industrial Park District' Hall West Vacant Land Industrial Park Industrial Park District' South Commercial Offices Industrial Park Industrial Park District' East Warehouses Industrial Park Industrial Park District 1 Haven Avenue Overlay District(HAOD) 2 Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD) Exhibit D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-46 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 2 C. The subject property is an approximately 85,000 square foot food hall with a 21,000 square foot outdoor eating area in a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres. The center consists of seven (7) buildings: two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings, and a multi-tenant retail building; and d. The subject property was previously permitted operation of operation of thirty-four (34) food-related tenant spaces (approximately 59,000 square feet), a gourmet market (approximately 20,500 square feet), and an art gallery (5,619 square feet); and e. This Conditional Use Permit proposes expand the number of conditionally permitted uses onsite while maintaining all previous entitlement and their conditions of approvals. The following tables are established under Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 to outline temporary and permanent uses permittable in the various areas of the HCM: Temporary Uses/Events',10 Parking Unit 101 Outdoor Tenant Lot6,7,8,9 Eating Area Spaces Live Music/Concerts2,4,5 N Y Y N Live Background Music3 N Y Y Y Other Special Gathering Events2,4,5 N Y Y Y Private Event/Weddin 52,4,5 N Y Y N Events with Alcohols N Y Y Y Cultural Events/Exhibits N Y Y Y Movie Night N Y Y Y Classes/Seminars/Workshops N Y Y Y Community Group Meetings N Y Y Y Farmer's Market Y Y Y N Night Market N Y N N Car Showss Y N N N Fairs and Festivals Y N N N Temporary Retail Space Y Y Y N Animal-Keeping/Petting Zoos N N N N Outdoor Sporting/Athletic Events Y Y N N 1. All events shall conform to the City's performance standards(Chapter 17.66),including noise and odor standards. 2. Amplified or acoustical sounds permitted. 3. Acoustical sounds only. 4. Includes designated space for patrons to attend events. 5. Must notify San Bernardino Sheriff's Department of activities prior to event. 6. Provide signage and site lighting for all event occurring to safely direct attendees to intended destinations. 7. Separate with physical barriers event areas off from the rest of the parking lot.Provide vehicle and pedestrian paths of travel to ensure safe circulation. 8. Provide off-site parking spaces equivalent to 125%of the number of parking spaces dedicated to event space(e.g.,25 spaces needed offsite for 20 spaces used for temporary retail stalls onsite). 9. Up to 4 events are permitted a year. City events are exempt from the 4-event limit. 10. Ancillary sale of merchandise permitted. Exterior- Interior- Unit 101 Mezzanine Permanent Uses2,3 Facing Facing Suites Suites Size 9,550 s.f. 49,450 s.f. 13,731 s.f. (market) 5,619 s.f. 6,680 storage) Restaurants Y Y Y Y Grocery N N Y N PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-46 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 3 Art Gallery N N N Y General Retail Y N N Y Office Y N N Y Indoor Fitness' Y N N Y Indoor Amusement' Y N N Y Education/Childcare/Tutoring' Y N N Y Individual uses limited to one(1)suite with a maximum size of 3,000 square feet.Limit is shared between all the categories. 2. Permanent uses are not permitted in the Parking Lot or Outdoor Eating Area. 3. The following uses are prohibited: Liquor stores,Convenience stores,Adult-Oriented business, Gun sales,Gun ranges,Tattoo establishments, Smoke shops, Hookah shops,Secondhand dealer,Thrift stores, Bars/nightclubs,Animal-Keeping/Sales, Massage, Mortuary/Funeral home,Manufacturing,Warehousing,and Storage not part of an approved use. f. The Conditional Use Permit is granted on a provisional basis for a period of one(1) year. During that time, HCM is granted leeway to experiment with a variety of events that fall within the constraints placed by the Conditions of Approvals.The City reserves the right to re-evaluate the range of uses permitted and place additional restrictions on event types any time during the first year. Wherein a specific event type does not occur in that one (1)year period, the uses may be re- evaluated in future yearsEvents that deviate or intensify from events in the first year are subject to re-review.Any revisions to the facility to incorporate a permanent use where permanent uses have not been approved (i.e., Entertainment Flex space, parking lot and outdoor eating area)will require additional entitlements; and g. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit does not constitute automatic permits to operate the uses indicated in the tables above. Prior to any commencement of any use, a Condition of Approval requires that all appropriate permits and Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.This requirement ensures that the space where the event or use occurs will conform to all California health and safety standards. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. Temporary uses are permitted throughout the City regardless of zoning district. Development Code Section 17.104 provides guidance on the ranges of temporary use categories that are permitted in the City. Events such as concerts, fairs and festivals, farmer's markets, etc. are all conditionally permitted under a Temporary Use Permit. Section 17.104 also lists guidelines for specific temporary use permits. The events permitted and their guidelines are similar to the events and guidelines proposed under this Conditional Use Permit.The intent of the proposed Conditional Use Permit is to streamline the process for HCM to hold temporary events that are generally consistent with those permitted on other sites in the City. Permanent uses such as the previously approved restaurants in the interior spaces, the previously approved gourmet market, and the variety of non-restaurant uses permitted in the front-facing spaces and mezzanine, are all consistent with the uses permitted or conditionally permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District of the Zoning District. All permanent uses will conform with performance standards (e.g. noise, odors) established in the City's Municipal Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-46 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 4 b. The existing commercial center is well-designed to accommodate a wide variety of permanent and temporary uses. Pedestrian access is provided to the Entertainment Flex space, outdoor eating areas and all tenant spaces, and there is absence of physical constraints that would restrict access. The proposed uses will occupy previously unused spaces designated for the gourmet market and make use of existing spaces already dedicated to outdoor dining. Also, events are temporary in nature and subject to revision if it is discovered that it the density or intensity of events create impacts on adjacent neighbors. c. The proposed uses are located at an existing commercial shopping center. The permanent uses are consistent with uses found in other existing commercial shopping center. Temporary uses will be conditioned to meet all City performance standards, including but not limited to noise, circulation, and public safety. If impacts detrimental to public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare are discovered during the 1-year provisional time period, the City can re-evaluate the use and impose additional conditions as necessary. 4. Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves a modification of the approved uses and activities for an existing 85,000 square feet food hall. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on their own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 111" DAY OF August 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I,Anne McIntosh,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-46 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 5 Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. DRC2021-00195,A REQUEST FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATION OF A FOOD HALL— HAVEN CITY MARKET, LOCATED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8443 HAVEN AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0208-622-27 A. Recitals. 1. Tommy Ly, owner of Lyfe Company, LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 111" day of August 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8443 Haven Avenue; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Commercial Center Industrial Park Industrial Park District' 2 North City of Rancho Cucamonga City Industrial Park Industrial Park District' Hall West Vacant Land Industrial Park Industrial Park District' South Commercial Offices Industrial Park Industrial Park District' East Warehouses Industrial Park Industrial Park District 1 Haven Avenue Overlay District(HAOD) 2 Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD) Exhibit E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-45 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 2 C. The subject property is an approximately 85,000 square foot food hall with a 21,000 square foot outdoor eating area in a commercial/office center of about 17.65 acres. The center consists of seven (7) buildings: two (2) dental office buildings, three (3) multi-tenant office buildings, and a multi-tenant retail building; and d. The subject property was previously permitted operation of operation of thirty-four (34) food-related tenant spaces (approximately 59,000 square feet), a gourmet market (approximately 20,500 square feet), and an art gallery (5,619 square feet); and e. The applicant submitted Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2021-00149 in conjunction with this Entertainment Permit application to modify the uses onsite. Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 proposes a variety of temporary entertainment uses and events to be permitted onsite, including but not limited to concerts, private parties, fairs and festivals, etc. The scope of these temporary uses and events includes amplified music and other entertainment activites that requires an Entertainment Permit; and f. This Entertainment Permit is proposed to permit a variety of entertainment activities to complement the uses and activities proposed under Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2021-00149, including but not limited to: amplified music,dancing,discjockey and/orkaraoke; and g. The proposed entertainment activities are permitted with Haven City Market building and in the outdoor eating area to the rear and side of the building. Entertainment activities are prohibited from covering more than 50%of the south lawn area. Entertainment is not permitted in the front parking lot at the front of the building. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. It is unlikely that approving the Entertainment Permit would erode the conduct of the establishment or impact public health, safety, morals, or welfare. b. Haven City Market has continued to adhere to City regulation and has maintained operation in an orderly manner. It is unlikely that approving the Entertainment Permit would cause Haven City Market to operate in an illegal and/or unorderly manner. c. The proposed Entertainment Permit is unlikely to create a public nuisance. All entertainment-related activities will be located onsite and will be conditioned to meet City performance standards, including noise, circulation, and safety. The Entertainment Permit is also subject to an annual renewal process. In the event that the Entertainment Permit creates public nuisance and the condition is not remedied, the Entertainment Permit would potentially not be renewed. d. The project site is located in the Industrial Park (IP) District and substantially surrounded by existing industrial uses and City Hall.The closest residential uses are the Avana Apartments, located over 800 feet away and across from Haven Avenue. The proposed activities permitted under the Entertainment Permit are unlikely to impact the peace and quiet of those neighborhoods given the distance and lack of adjoining property lines. In the event that the Entertainment Permit irreversibly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-45 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 3 impacts the peace and quiet of adjoining neighborhoods, the Entertainment Permit would potentially not be renewed. e. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement during the course of this application. In the event that City staff discovers false, misleading, or fraudulent statements have been made by the applicant, the Entertainment Permit could be revoked. 4. Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the minor alterations of private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project involves a modification of the approved uses and activities for an existing 85,000 square feet food hall. No square footage will be added to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on their own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11t" DAY OF August 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11t" day of August 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-45 DRC2021-00195 HAVEN CITY MARKET ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT August 11, 2021 Page 4 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2021-00149 DRC2021-00195 Project Name: EDR - Haven City Market CUP Modification Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Exterior-facing tenant suites and mezzanine are permitted to have education, indoor fitness, indoor amusement, general retail, and general office uses in addition to restaurant use. The mezzanine area is permitted to have an art gallery use. The Planning Director shall make the determination of whether a future proposed use is substantially similar to one of the listed-use above. Education and indoor fitness uses are limited to one (1) suite with a maximum size of 3,000 square feet in either of the tenant suites or mezzanine area. The following uses are prohibited: Liquor stores, Convenience stores, Adult-Oriented business, Gun sales, Gun ranges, Tattoo establishments, Smoke shops, Hookah shops, Secondhand dealer, Thrift stores, Bars/nightclubs, Animal-Keeping/Sales, Massage, Mortuary/Funeral home, Manufacturing, Warehousing, and Storage not part of an approved use. 2. Temporary events are permitted in Unit 101, outdoor eating area and parking lot without the need of Temporary Use Permit. Events are limited to the 13,731 s.f. area previously designated for the market. The 6,680 s.f. area designated as the back-of-house storage area shall remain as storage. Events are limited to no more than 50% of the outdoor eating area. The remainder of the area shall be accessible by the general public. Events in the parking lot shall include the following requirements: 1. Events shall be physically seperated from the rest of the parking lot. 2. Provide signage and site lighting for all event occurring to safely direct attendees to intended destinations 3. Provide vehicle and pedestrian paths of travel to ensure safe circulation 4. Provide off-site parking spaces equivalent to 125% of the number of parking spaces dedicated to event space (e.g., 25 spaces needed offsite for 20 spaces used for temporary retail stalls onsite) 5. Up to 4 events are permitted a year. City events are exempt from the 4-event limit. 3. All temporary and permanent events are subject to the limitations in Attachment A of this Resolution. Exhibit F www.CityofRC.us Printed:8/3/2021 Project#: DRC2021-00149 DRC2021-00195 Project Name: EDR - Haven City Market CUP Modification Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted on a provisional basis for a period of one (1) year. The City reserves the right to re-evaluate the range of uses permitted and place additional restrictions on event types any time during the first year. Wherein a specific event type does not occur in that one (1) year period, the uses may be re-evaluated in future years (i.e. if no live music events occur within the first year, it can be reviewed in subsequent years). Events that deviate or intensify from events in the first year are subject to re-review. Any revisions to the facility to incorporate a permanent use where permanent uses have not been approved (i.e., Entertainment Flex space, parking lot and outdoor eating area)will require additional entitlements. The operator of Haven City Market shall report all temporary events that occur on the subject property during the review period. The Planning Director shall review the reported activities of Haven City Market and determine whether events are consistent with the list of uses permitted. The Planning Director shall make the final determination as to whether temporary events may continue after the one (1) year provisional period and/or request changes to events. 5. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit does not constitute automatic permits to operate the uses indicated in the tables above. Prior to any commencement of any use, a Condition of Approval requires that all appropriate permits and Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:8/3/2021 Page 2 of 3 Project#: DRC2021-00149 DRC2021-00195 Project Name: EDR - Haven City Market CUP Modification Location: 8443 HAVEN AVE - 020862227-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 12. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 13. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 2. During events no signs or structures allowed in the public Right-of-Way 3. During events provide adequate on-site parking and abide by all traffic laws. www.CityofRC.us Printed:8/3/2021 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A All temporary and permanent events in Haven City Market are subject to the limitations in Attachment A of this Resolution. Temporary Uses/Events',10 Parking Unit 101 Outdoor Eating Tenant Lot6,7,8,9 Area Spaces Live Music/Concerts2,4,5 N Y Y N Live Background Music3 N Y Y Y Other Special Gathering EventS2,4,5 N Y Y Y Private Event/Weddin s2,4,5 N Y Y N Events with Alcohols N Y Y Y Cultural Events/Exhibits N Y Y Y Movie Night N Y Y Y Classes/Seminars/Workshops N Y Y Y Community Group Meetings N Y Y Y Farmer's Market Y Y Y N Night Market N Y N N Car Showss Y N N N Fairs and FestivalS5 Y N N N Temporary Retail Space Y Y Y N Animal-Keeping/Petting Zoos N N N N Outdoor Sporting/Athletic Events Y Y N N 1. All events shall conform to the City's performance standards(Chapter 17.66), including noise and odor standards. 2. Amplified or acoustical sounds permitted 3. Acoustical sounds only 4. Includes designated space for patrons to attend events. 5. Must notify San Bernardino Sheriff's Department of activities prior to event. 6. Provide signage and site lighting for all event occurring to safely direct attendees to intended destinations. 7. Separate with physical barriers event areas off from the rest of the parking lot. Provide vehicle and pedestrian paths of travel to ensure safe circulation. 8. Provide off-site parking spaces equivalent to 125%of the number of parking spaces dedicated to event space(e.g.,25 spaces needed offsite for 20 spaces used for temporary retail stalls onsite). 9. Up to 4 events are permitted a year. City events are exempt from the 4-event limit. 10. Ancillary sale of merchandise permitted. Exterior- Interior- Unit 101 Mezzanine Permanent Uses2,3 Facing Facing Suites Suites Size 9,550 s.f. 49,450 s.f. 13,731 s.f. (market) 5,619 s.f. 6,680 (storage) Restaurants Y Y Y Y Grocery N N Y N Art Gallery N N N Y General Retail Y N N Y Office Y N N Y Indoor Fitness' Y N N Y Indoor Amusement' Y N N Y Education/Childcare/Tutoring' Y N N Y 1. Individual uses limited to one(1)suite with a maximum size of 3,000 square feet. Limit is shared between all the categories. 2. Permanent uses are not permitted in the Parking Lot or Outdoor Eating Area. 3. The following uses are prohibited: a. Liquor stores,Convenience stores,Adult-Oriented business,Gun sales,Gun ranges,Tattoo establishments, Smoke shops, Hookah shops,Secondhand dealer,Thrift stores, Bars/nightclubs,Animal-Keeping/Sales, Massage, Mortuary/Funeral home, Manufacturing,Warehousing,and Storage not part of an approved use. Exhibit G Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for [Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 and Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195] I, Tommy Ly, on behalf of owner Lyfe Company, LLC, as applicant for Haven City Market, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 and Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195, for property located at 8443 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 1111, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-46 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00149 3. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-45 for Entertainment Permit DRC2021-00195 Olt, i I DATE: August 11, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment to amend the land use element to add three new zoning designations known as City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, and redesignate 62 parcels identified in Exhibit 1 of the staff report from their existing land use designations to one of the new land use designations. (DRC2021-00281) Development Code Amendment to establish three new zoning districts known as City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, establish development standards and permitted uses for each new zoning district, and remove 8 parcels from the Haven Avenue Overlay and 1 parcel from the Industrial Commercial Overlay. (DRC2021-00282) Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 41 of the 62 parcels within the city to one of the three new zoning districts. (DRC2021-00283) Planned Community Amendment to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 of the 62 parcels to the new Urban Corridor zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Corridor zoning district. (DRC2021- 00284) Specific Plan Amendment to amend the Victoria Specific Plan to rezone 6 of the 62 parcels within the specific plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. (DRC2021- 00285) Master Plan Amendment to amend the Town Square Master Plan to rezone 2 of the 62 parcels within the master plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. (DRC2021-00286) An addendum to the 2010 General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared for this project. All of these items will be forwarded to City Council for final consideration following the Planning Commission's recommendation on each. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning Commission adopt resolution number 21-50 recommending to that the City Council adopt resolutions and ordinances to do the following: Pagel • Amend the 2010 General Plan Land Use Element to add three new land use designations: City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High and redesignate 62 parcels from their existing land use designations to one of the new land use designations in order to be consistent with the proposed housing element and state law. The 62 parcels affected by this General Plan Amendment and the proposed new land use designations assigned to each are identified in Exhibit 1 of this staff report. • Amend the Development Code (Title 17) to establish three new zoning districts: Urban Center, General Urban and Urban Corridor that correspond to the proposed three General Plan Land Use Designations, establish development standards and permitted uses for each new zoning district and remove 8 parcels from the Haven Avenue Overlay and 1 parcel from the Industrial Commercial Overlay, as identified in Exhibit 2. • Amend the Zoning Map to rezone 41 identified parcels within the city to one of the new zoning districts. • Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 parcels identified in Exhibit 3within the planned community to the new Urban Corridor zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Corridor zoning district. • Amend the Victoria Specific Plan to rezone 6 parcels identified in Exhibit 4 within the specific plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. • Amend the Town Square Master Plan to rezone 2 parcels identified in Exhibit 5 within the master plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. BACKGROUND: Since 1969, California has required that all local governments (cities and counties) adequately plan to meet the housing needs of everyone in the community. California's local governments meet this requirement by adopting housing plans as part of their General Plan. California's housing-element law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and demand of Californians, local governments must adopt plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for(and do not unduly constrain), housing development. As a result, housing policy in California rests largely on the effective implementation of local general plans and, in particular, local housing elements. The City is currently in the process of updating its housing element as part of the PlanRC General Plan process. In Rancho Cucamonga, the sixth cycle housing element is required to be certified by the City Council by October 15, 2021 and covers the planning period of October 2021 through October 2029. However, the state provides a 120-day grace period for certification, allowing cities to adopt and certify their housing element no later than February 12, 2022. The City is currently on track to adopt the new General Plan, including the housing element, later this year, or early next year, by the final deadline of February 12, 2022. While certifying and adopting the housing element within the grace period is permitted, one of the provisions of current housing law states that if a city cannot show that it has a capacity to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based on its existing planning and zoning framework by the statutory deadline (i.e., October 15, 2021), the city is considered to have a "shortfall" in capacity. If there is a shortfall in capacity, the City must rezone sites identified in its housing inventory that can meet the shortfall and establish a "by-right" process for new housing developments that include 20 percent of the units for lower income households on those sites. This would eliminate discretionary Planning review for these developments and reduce local control over certain new developments. To avoid this, the City is proposing to amend the 2010 General Plan, Development Code and related special planning documents to adopt new General Plan land use and zoning designations for selected parcels to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021. These sites were selected from sites identified by the draft Housing Element that were recognized as having the potential to develop housing. The draft Housing Element was presented to the Planning Commission on May 12 and submitted to the state for review on June 3. The state provided initial comments on the element via conference call on July 29, 2021 and provided a few comments on our draft Housing Element and were supportive of our plans to rezone Page 2 by the October 15th deadline. ANALYSIS: The City identified 62 vacant parcels that in its inventory of housing sites to achieve its RHNA obligation at all income levels. If these parcels are rezoned with updated land use and zoning designations, they will provide fill the shortfall of planned housing units needed to meet the RHNA by October 15, 2021. A list and maps of all affected parcels is listed as Exhibit 1. The proposed general plan and zoning designations that have been developed as part of the PlanRC General Plan process. To properly redesignate these sites to allow for housing development the following changes to our existing planning documents are being proposed: General Plan Amendment Staff proposes amending Chapter 2 (Land Use) of the 2010 General Plan to add three new mixed use general plan designations to support potential future development of additional housing units along key corridors, consistent with the community vision laid out in the new General Plan, along with conforming changes to the remainder of the chapter to ensure internal consistency. All necessary land use maps, tables and text will be amended to include these new designations: City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High. • City Center is a mixed-use designation along activated public spaces with commercial and residential uses at densities of 40-100 units per acre. City Center sites correspond with the downtown areas identified through public input on the new General Plan, including the Civic Center area (Haven and Foothill), Victoria Gardens area (Foothill and Day Creek) as well as 411 and Haven. • City Corridor Moderate is a medium to high intensity mixed use designation along active, walkable streets with commercial and residential uses of 24-42 units per acre. These sites are located along Foothill Boulevard west of Haven Avenue. • City Corridor High is intended to provide medium to high intensity mixed use development along active, walkable corridors at densities of 36-60 units per acre. These sites are located along Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue. The proposed map, text and table changes are provided as Attachment A to the Resolution. Development Code Amendment Staff proposes the following changes to the Development Code to establish three new zoning districts: Urban Center, General Urban and Urban Corridor that correspond to the proposed three General Plan Land Use Designations. General Plan • Use Designation • City Center Mixed Use - Urban Center City Corridor Moderate Mixed Use - General Urban City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor Development standards for each zoning district are also being proposed, including density, setbacks, building height and open space requirements. Table 17.30.030-1 (land use table) is also proposed to be amended to include allowed land uses and permit requirements for uses within the new zoning designations. In addition, 8 parcels identified for new zoning designations will be removed from the Haven Avenue Overlay and 1 parcel proposed for rezoning will be removed from the Industrial Commercial Overlay. These overlays are more restrictive than the land use table of the Development Code with respect to permitted uses. Removing these parcels from their current overlays will allow broader application of the new zoning, development standards and allowed uses for those parcels. The proposed text and table changes are provided as Attachment B to the Resolution. Zoning Map Amendment The zoning map is also proposed to be amended to rezone 41 of the identified parcels from their existing zoning designation to one of the new zoning designations. The remaining parcels are part of a special planning area (Planned Community, Specific Plan or Master Plan) that will be amended as outlined below. The proposed map Page 3 changes are provided as Attachment C to the Resolution. Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 13 of the identified parcels are located within the Terra Vista Planned Community (north side of Foothill between Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue), which supersede many regulations of the Development Code. The Terra Vista Plan is proposed to be amended to rezone the 11 identified parcels to the Mixed Use — Urban Corridor zoning designation and establish development standards for the urban corridor zoning district including density, setbacks, building height and open space requirement. These standards will mirror what is being proposed for the Development Code. Text will also be added indicating allowed land uses for the Mixed Use—Urban Corridor zone will be governed by the Development Code Allowed Land Use Table (17.30.030-1). The proposed text and table changes are provided as Attachment D to the Resolution. The proposed map changes are provided as Attachment C to the Resolution. Victoria Specific Plan Amendment 6 of the identified parcels are located within the Victoria Specific Plan (south side of Foothill between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard), which supersede many regulations of the Development Code. The Victoria Specific Plan is proposed to be amended to rezone the 6 identified parcels to the Mixed Use — Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the urban center zoning district including density, setbacks, building height and open space requirement. These standards will mirror what is being proposed for the Development Code. Text will also be added indicating allowed land uses for the Mixed Use— Urban Center zone will be governed by the Development Code Allowed Land Use Table (17.30.030-1). The proposed text and table changes are provided as Attachment E to the Resolution. The proposed map changes are provided as Attachment C to the Resolution. Town Square Master Plan Amendment 2 of the identified parcels are located within the Town Square Master Plan (north west corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive), which supersede many regulations of the Development Code. The Terra Vista Plan is proposed to be amended to rezone the 2 identified parcels to the Mixed Use— Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the urban center zoning district including density, setbacks, building height and open space requirement. These standards will mirror what is being proposed for the Development Code. Text will also be added indicating allowed land uses for the Mixed Use — Urban Center zone will be governed by the Development Code Allowed Land Use Table (17.30.030-1). The proposed text and table changes are provided as Attachment F to the Resolution. The proposed map changes are provided as Attachment C to the Resolution. Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed changes do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed project would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review. The addendum is provided as Exhibit 2. The EIR addendum will be certified by the City Council when they take final action. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed amendments may result in the development of additional housing and context sensitive non- residential uses which may result in an increase in revenue through property and sales taxes. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Through the proactive rezoning of these properties to meet state law, we are intentionally embracing and anticipating the future to retain local control on new housing developments to ensure that they are developed Page 4 with the high quality and thoughtful design Rancho Cucamonga is known for. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1 — Master Parcel List and Maps Exhibit 2 — Parcels to be removed from Haven Avenue Overlay and Industrial Commercial Overlay Exhibit 3 —Terra Vista Planned Community parcels to be rezoned Exhibit 4 —Victoria Specific Plan parcels to be rezoned Exhibit 5 —Town Square Master Plan parcels to be rezoned Exhibit 6 — Draft EIR Addendum Exhibit 7 — Resolution 21-50 with proposed changes as attachments A-F Page 5 Parcels for Proposed General Plan/Zoning Designation Changes Parcel Number(APN) Address Current GP Designation New GP Designation Current Zoning Designation New Zoning Designation Special Planning Area 20721142 8841 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Medium Residential General Urban 20721143 Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Medium Residential General Urban 20721144 Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Medium Residential General Urban 20721146 8801 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20810117 8998 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20810118 9008 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20810119 9030 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20810120 9040 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20815101 9590 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20815115 9554 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20832124 10043 FOOTHILL BLVD Medium Residential City Corridor Moderate Medium Residential General Urban 20833108 10315 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Commercial/Office General Urban 20833117 10333 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Low Medium Residential General Urban 20833118 10237 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Low Medium Residential General Urban 20833123 10277 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor Moderate Low Medium Residential General Urban 20833140 Mixed Use City Corridor High Mixed Use Urban Corridor Town Square/Haven Ave Overlay 20833147 Mixed Use City Corridor High Mixed Use Urban Corridor Town Square/Haven Ave Overlay 20834115 8310 HAVEN AVE Industrial Park City Corridor High Industrial Park Urban Corridor Haven Ave Overlay 20835302 10575 FOOTHILL BLVD Industrial Park City Center Industrial Park Urban Center Haven Ave Overlay 20835503 Community Commercial City Corridor High Industrial Park Urban Corridor Industrial Commercial Overlay 20863247 General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20863248 9172 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20863249 9116 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Low Residential General Urban 20863250 9110 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 20913101 10411 26TH ST Industrial Park City Corridor High Industrial Park Urban Corridor Haven Ave Overlay 20913102 8812 HAVEN AVE Industrial Park City Corridor High Industrial Park Urban Corridor Haven Ave Overlay 20949104 Industrial Park City Corridor Moderate Industrial Park General Urban 21008141 Industrial Park City Center Industrial Park Urban Center Haven Ave Overlay 21008142 Industrial Park City Center Industrial Park Urban Center Haven Ave Overlay 22902168 12181 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902169 12225 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902170 12271 FOOTHILL BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902171 8158 DAY CREEK BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902172 8188 DAY CREEK BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902173 8160 DAY CREEK BLVD General Commercial City Center Regional Related Office/Commercial Urban Center Victoria SP 22902307 General Commercial City Corridor High General Commercial Urban Corridor 22931114 Community Commercial City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 22931115 12939 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor High Low Residential Urban Corridor 107742251 Mixed Use City Corridor High Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 107742255 Mixed Use City Corridor High Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 107742298 Mixed Use I City Corridor High I Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 107742299 Mixed Use City Corridor High Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC Exhibit A Parcels for Proposed General Plan/Zoning Designation Changes Parcel Number(APN) Address Current GP Designation New GP Designation Current Zoning Designation New Zoning Designation Special Planning Area 107742301 Community Commercial City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 107742302 Community Commercial City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 107762134 9950 FOOTHILL BLVD Community Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 107764168 8001 ARCHIBALD AVE Community Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 107764169 8019 ARCHIBALD AVE Community Commercial City Corridor Moderate Community Commercial General Urban 107764171 8045 ARCHIBALD AVE Community Commercial City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 109012117 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012118 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012120 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012121 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012122 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012138 Mixed Use City Corridor High Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109012139 Mixed Use City Corridor High Financial Urban Corridor Terra Vista PC 109060120 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 109060121 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 110016102 8033 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 110016103 12962 FOOTHILL BLVD Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 110020103 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 110020104 8050 EAST AVE Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor 110020107 Mixed Use City Corridor High Community Commercial Urban Corridor WILSONAVE BEECHAVE' W U O J m Y W U Q Cr O BASE LINE RD W Q. Q r Q W m Existing General Plan Z w Q =� m = - Community Commercial U momFOOTHILLBLVD 1qa r General Commercial i 0 Industrial Park 0�ARROWRTE Medium Residential a - Mixed Use Q LU w 6TH ST I i N 34 WTH ST Miles Q City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSON AVE BEECH AVER Q - U O J tt1 Y W W U Q BASE LINE RD �q Y� W r Q Proposed General Plan w m Land Use Changes = D Z U D � _L m = 0 City Center Q U �Va m O FOOTHILL BLVD °cl� ,d r-P] 0 City Corridor Moderate 0 City Corridor High ARROW RTE El w V Q O z LU w 6TH ST N o 114 1�2 34 1 4TH ST Draft, July 26, 2021 Miles LWj City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSONAVE BEECH 1% Q O Cr m Y W W U Q O BASE LINE RD IU Q. r C � Q r Q w m Existing Zoning z Q =� m = 0 Community Commercial (CC) �o m . .= FOOTHILL BLVD ° ,� �� %r ® Commercial/Office (CO) i, General Commercial (GC) 0 Industrial Park(IP) �ARROWRTE a 0 Low-Medium Residential (LM) 0 Financial (MFC) 0 0 Mixed Use (MU) z 0 Regional Rel. Ofc/Comm (RRO/C) Uj w 6TH ST N 0 1�4 1�2 34 1 4TH ST Miles La City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSON AVE BEEC ,O J m Y W W U ¢ O BASE LINE RD Q. Q r Q w m ® Proposed Zoning Changes = W < = 0 General Urban ILa m iO/. FOOTHILL BLVD ° / ,� %� 0 Urban Center ��� 0 Urban Corridor �ARROWRTE El 0 I 2 � W 6TH ST N O 1/4 1/Z 3/4 1 Draft, July 26, 2021 4TH ST Miles LaU City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 SITE TO BE REMOVED FROM INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY " E w Gpo Qa Parcel# `b 20835503 GG�FadtFikkl:B Iv:d 'uu� • Q xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx • Q U �' �. � ]Q',] xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx x • O xxxxr,]�xxxx xxxxxxxxx.;.;xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxk • Xx X Xx X X x XX X X x X X x X X x X X x X X x X X x X X x X X% Xx X X x X Xx (XXXX • xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxX.xxxxxxX.xxxxxxx% • X%XX XX%X xXXx X Xx XXXXX%XXXXXXX X x X X x XX%XXxXXx • • G •• ••••• x%Xx xxxx xxxx X x x x Nik x x k x x k x x x x x x x x x xx x xx x xxxx • D x,�Xx xxx xxxxx• xxXxxxxxXX—XXXxx • Laurel St xxxxx xxx xx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx r`r.w! xxxxxx xxxxxx • p xxxxx xxxxxXXXX xxC4 00 Win. Exhibit B SITES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY r e # 20834115 r „ 20913101 r 20913102 i 21008141 r i • iiiii 21008142 20833140 i x 20833147 i xx 20835302 xx i xx i xx xx * * i HIM auk IL i l i i t t t t �i i i i IL71 i 0 i i i W3 o Z, Terra Vista Parcels to be Rezoned (Shown in dark green) i:l7'J !:Sf f i —Foot i11IBIa Ic F—Will 61a1 Fv OM IIIHIvdo Fa of hill•Blvd� 1077 7- 107742299 1077 1077 107742302 109012117 109012118 109012120 109012121 109012122 109012138 109012139 Exhibit C Victoria Specific Plan Parcels to be Rezoned (Shown in dark green) r - G S3 m r- Y N � Victoria Gardens Ln U a d 15 22902168 229021697 �6G F_oothiVl161vc1 F.6okreIV ee 22902170 ��$ 11 22902171 22902172 22902173 Exhibit D Town Square Master Plan Parcels to be Rezoned (Shown in Purple) =(66 FdotFiilllBlvd activp tip 33140 20833147 tm Im C ity Hall Station iklc-� ter U F Rnnnhn Ckicamon6f Exhibit E ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update SCH # 2000061027 August 2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II Phone: (909) 774-4324 Email: Jennifer.Nakamura@cityofrc.us Exhibit F This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. i 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 18 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 18 1.2 LEGAL STANDARDS ................................................................................... 18 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.............................................. 21 2.1 LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT....................................................... 21 2.2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS UNDER THE PROPOSED PROJECT................................ 21 2.3 ADDENDUM SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW............................... 33 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT................................................................... 34 3.1 IMPACTS HAVING NO POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS...................... 34 3.2 IMPACTS POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ................................................... 35 3.2.1 AESTHETICS ................................................................................... 35 3.2.2 AIR QUALITY................................................................................... 36 3.2.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES............................................................ 37 3.2.4 ENERGY........................................................................................... 38 3.2.5 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS................................................... 39 3.2.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS.................................................................... 39 3.2.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .................................. 40 3.2.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY............................................ 42 3.2.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING ........................................................... 43 3.2.10 MINERAL RESOURCES .................................................................. 44 3.2.11 NOISE............................................................................................... 45 3.2.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING ........................................................ 46 3.2.13 PUBLIC SERVICES.......................................................................... 46 3.2.14 PARKS AND RECREATION ............................................................ 46 3.2.15 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION ............................................... 47 3.2.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES................................................. 49 3.2.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.............................................. 50 August 2021 i General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report 4.0 DETERMINATION/ADDENDUM CONCLUSION............................................... 51 5.0 ADDENDUM PREPARATION SOURCES/REFERENCES ............................... 52 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Regional Vicinity Map.................................................................................... 22 Exhibit 2: Site Vicinity Map............................................................................................ 23 Exhibit 3 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations ............................................... 24 Exhibit 4: Existing Zoning ............................................................................................. 25 Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations .......................................... 31 Exhibit 6: Proposed Zoning .......................................................................................... 32 August 2021 ii General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document serves as the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)documentation for the proposed City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Code Amendments (proposed project). As Lead Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) certified the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (Certified EIR; SCH No. 2000061027) on May 19, 2010, in connection with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update (General Plan) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the Certified EIR has been prepared for consideration as the proposed project involves amending the General Plan Land Use Element and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (Development Code). The analysis in this addendum to the Certified EIR was conducted to determine whether the proposed project would result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts compared to the impacts disclosed in the Certified EIR. This addendum demonstrates that the analysis provided in the Certified EIR adequately addresses the potential physical environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration apply. 1.1 BACKGROUND State law requires every jurisdiction in California to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan to guide its physical development. The City's General Plan contains elements addressing land use, circulation and infrastructure, design, economic development, air quality and conservation, healthy community, housing, noise, parks, recreation and open space, and safety to establish the framework for population and job growth and for provision of public services and facilities. The Land Use Element is one of the seven mandated elements of a general plan. State law requires that every jurisdiction demonstrate that their existing planning and zoning framework allow for the realistic development of housing units to meet their allocation for each income level under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The City's RHNA allocation for the 2015 to 2023 planning period is 10,525 units. The current General Plan Land Use Element and Development Code have been able to accommodate its moderate income RHNA (5,245 units) with entitlements and potential accessory dwelling units (ADUs). As such, the City has 5,280 remaining units (5,073 extremely low/very low- and low-income units and 225 above moderate-income units)that need to be allocated as part of its planning and zoning framework. 1.2 LEGAL STANDARDS CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 specifies the type of documentation required when changes are proposed to a project. When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent or supplemental EIR shall be required unless one or more of the following events occurs: August2021 18 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. (c) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency's role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approval on that project is required. Information appearing after an approval does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions described in subdivision (a) occurs, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall only be prepared by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this situation no other responsible agency shall grant an approval August2021 19 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf for the project until the subsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted. (d) A subsequent EIR or subsequent negative declaration shall be given the same notice and public review as required under Section 15087 or Section 15072. A subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall state where the previous document is available and can be reviewed. Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines includes situations when a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required and, therefore, an addendum to the previously Certified EIR is appropriate. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states: (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously Certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. As discussed below, none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of subsequent EIR apply and the preparation of this Addendum is appropriate. This Addendum supports the conclusion that the proposed project modifications are minor and do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects in the Certified EIR. In addition, as discussed below, the proposed project modifications would not result in any new or substantially increased significant environmental impacts, new mitigation measures, or new alternatives that would substantially reduce significant impacts. As a result, an addendum is an appropriate CEQA document for analysis and consideration of the proposed project modifications. August 2021 20 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT MODIFICATIONS 2.1 LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed land use and development code amendments associated with the proposed project would occur entirely within the City limits; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity Map. Rancho Cucamonga is located in the southwest portion of San Bernardino County, south of the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and Angeles National Forest. Adjoining cities include Fontana to the east, Ontario to the south, and Upland to the west; refer to Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity Map. Proposed changes to the Land Use Element and Development Code would be reflected in parcels at various locations within the project site. The City encompasses a mix of existing commercial, industrial, residential, mixed use, and park uses; refer to Exhibit 3, Existing General Plan Land Use Designations. On-site zoning includes a mix of existing commercial, industrial, residential, financial, mixed use, and regional related office/commercial; refer to Exhibit 4, Existing Zoning. 2.2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS UNDER THE PROPOSED PROJECT As stated, the City has 5,280 remaining RHNA units (5,073 extremely low/very low- and low-income units and 225 above moderate-income units)that need to be allocated as part of its planning and zoning framework in order to meet State RHNA requirements. As such, the City proposes the following: 1. Amend the General Plan Land Use Element to provide four new land use designations and amend the land use map, tables, and text to reflect the new land use designations; refer to Table 1, Proposed Land Use and Development Code Amendments, and Exhibit 5, Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations. a. City Center. The City Center land use designation is intended to provide mixed-use urban areas with commercial and residential hubs and infill development along activated public spaces. Buildings would transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods and developments would support safe streets for pedestrians and cyclists. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of commercial, residential, service, and/or office uses on upper stories are allowed in the City Center land use areas. Additionally, high density residential (40 to 100 dwelling units per acre) with nearby civic uses would be allowed in the City Center land use area. b. City Corridor High. The City Corridor High land use designation is intended to provide medium to high intensity mixed-use development along active, walkable corridors. Buildings would front streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods with some context-sensitive auto-oriented uses in transition areas. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of uses on upper stories are allowed in the City Corridor High land use areas. High density residential (36 to 60 dwelling units per acre) in proximity to some civic and auto-oriented uses is also allowed if the scale and character is appropriate. August 2021 21 Lancaster I I 395 Palmdale Adelanto I Apple Valley i Victorville I i Hesperia 1 L O S A N G E L E S I S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y I C O U N T Y I i 1 � Project I Arrowhead San Site Fernando Running San Springs Burbank Bernardino Pasadena ' Glendora J Fontana � Rancho 101 1 among Rialto Redlands West Pom a Ontario Covina -- ---� _ Chino -- -- Los .� Whittier I Riverside Angeles Yorba' Moreno ' Linda i Norco Valley � r Fullerton _ \ Corona RIVERSIDE Torrance ` C O U N T Y Garden Orange \ Perris Grove ORANGE � Sun Hemet Santa C O U N T Y City Long Ana Beach Irvine Huntingto Costa �` Lake Beach Mesa / Elsinore i Newport Beach Murrieta i i Laguna Aq Beach San Juan / Temecula Cy7c� Capistrano ifs\ �� C O Dana �'� -- cF PointSan Clemente USMC iFallbrook Camp Pendleton ti L �J ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR NOT TO SCALE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS �I� Regional Vicinity Map INTERNATIONAL 071211A 179819 Exhibit 1 r P. r[• ��1. -.' - - yi,+:�'"4 ter.. - a 1 4- 1, •r ;�'•�, ^� :tom � � . . _ ��"• `'gal',•.-' .`�.�' �:i. I• -------- . r. - ti IS 1{� i i'F r wy' 1 - l — P Zi 0 s' .r� � 1 � 1 • �i •E �1-- Ir------�—� ��'- ■. , `} a bw • � ... ,I� —— r.t I <:. x r Base Line Road - - kil 15 8. ;E� - • L Foothill Boulevard. c��.l'_. •�' •1��� �•-�---. a� o � .� - , Arnow Route:' i 1 err ' i+;, -_ - I�il l 1i_=. ��y?L f5 � ' •„ -1 u u. �-_� ;II51 '�� f, i• ■ '- _ '. - ��' it R _ �. ? , .,ram--- - - - .r rY 1 i- .. - .•�'•�� - a � ei 'it rii�c�•.. A •+ .:�._ - •} .7 - � .- - :y .I - yiS-• — �• -- �.� 'L�a.. ; _ ?'•. ..#f - +:• i. �l �'+��f E _J-� •!p it = ,.� .. I~ ili 'Ik �• - _� .LT._.. 'S lA ..M I _ •111i 11 �1 - .I _ ii 67h SIL jr _� - - - - -- ---- 4th_S_treet ,ice • Y - - ' �1, ' �, • �• �. - (( _ .� - 1 _.._ _ rJA �Qwr. + .; 1 .:_ [Z� .; � — �' lY•�� r:���- 'k' '� _. _ t' �•�j�r�li!�!��� ��� ��1 - 1�:ail _ �.(- a II'' ;�• .. � �' • • 's • s • ' 'a • s a •' •� a • Michael Baker • WILSONAVE BEECH Q J m Y W W U Q O BASE LINE RD W W Existing General Plan 1001 Community Commercial w m General Commercial S 4 FOOTHILL BLVD ,a I� � 00 Industrial Park i, C Medium Residential ARROWRTE Mixed Use a 0 Z W 6TH ST 0 1�4 1�2 3 I Miles 4THST City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR NOT TO SCALE , RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS Existing General Plan Land Use Designations I II T E R N A T I a N A L 07/2111N 179819 Exhibit 3 WILSONAVE BEECH0R/1/ O m Y W W W U O BASE LINE RD W Existing Zoning z W W C Community Commercial (CC) m ® Commercial/Office (CO) 0 �O O FOOTHILL �� � � = General Commercial (GC) i Industrial Park (IP) ARROWRTE 0 Low-Medium Residential (LM) a � Financial (MFC) r Mixed Use (MU) z 0 Regional Rel. Ofc/Comm (RRO/C) LU W 6TH ST 0 '/44 'h % 1 K=Miles 4THST #City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR NOT TO SCALE , RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS 6dsting Zoning INTERNATIaNAi 07/211 A 179819 Exhibit 4 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf c. City Corridor Moderate. The City Corridor Moderate land use designation is intended to provide medium to high intensity mixed-use development along active, walkable streets. Buildings would front streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods with some context-sensitive auto- oriented uses in transition areas. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of uses on upper stories are allowed in the City Corridor Moderate land use areas. Medium density residential (24 to 42 dwelling units per acre) in proximity to some civic and auto-oriented uses is also allowed if the scale and character is appropriate. 2. Rezone 62 identified parcels to allow for additional housing units to one of three zoning districts that correspond to the four new General Plan land use designations; refer to Table 1 and Table 2, Summary of Proposed Parcel Rezoning, and Exhibit 6, Proposed Zoning. a. Urban Center— Limited. The Urban Center - Limited zone is intended to provide mixed-use urban areas with commercial and residential hubs and infill development along activated public spaces. Buildings would transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods and developments would support safe streets for pedestrians and cyclists. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of commercial, residential, service, and/or office uses on upper stories are allowed in the Urban Center - Limited zoning areas. Additionally, high density residential (40 to 100 dwelling units per acre) with nearby civic uses would be allowed within areas zoned Urban Center - Limited. b. City Corridor High. The City Corridor High zone is intended to provide medium to high intensity mixed-use development along active, walkable corridors. Buildings would front streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods with some context-sensitive auto-oriented uses in transition areas. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of uses on upper stories are allowed in areas zoned City Corridor High. High density residential (36 to 60 dwelling units per acre) in proximity to some civic and auto-oriented uses is also allowed if the scale and character is appropriate. c. General Urban— Limited. The General Urban — Limited zone is intended to provide medium to high intensity mixed-use development along active, walkable streets. Buildings would front streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods with some context-sensitive auto-oriented uses in transition areas. Primarily ground floor commercial and retail activity with a mix of uses on upper stories are allowed in areas designated General Urban — Limited, in addition to office, business, and service uses in proximity to walkable, urban areas. Medium density residential (24 to 42 dwelling units per acre) in proximity to some civic and auto-oriented uses is also allowed if the scale and character is appropriate. August 2021 26 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf 3. Amend the Development Code and applicable Specific Plan and Master Plans to establish development standards for the new proposed zoning districts. a. Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 parcels to the new Urban Corridor zoning designation; b. Amend the Victoria Specific Plan to rezone six parcels within the specific plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation; and c. Amend the Town Square Master Plan to rezone two parcels within the master plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation. Table 1 Proposed Land Use and Development Code Amendments Proposed Zone Urban Center-Limited City Corridor High General Urban-Limited General Plan Land Use Category City Center City Corridor High City Corridor Moderate Intent Mixed-use urban areas with Medium to high intensity Medium to high intensity mixed-use development commercial and residential mixed-use development along along active,walkable streets.Buildings front hubs and infill development active,walkable corridors. streets and transition in scale to surrounding along activated public Buildings front streets and neighborhoods with some context-sensitive auto- spaces. Buildings transition transition in scale to oriented uses in transition areas. in scale to surrounding surrounding neighborhoods neighborhoods and with some context-sensitive developments support safe auto-oriented uses in streets for pedestrians and transition areas. cyclists. Lot Size(min)' Large Medium to Large Medium Height 12 stories max 4 stories min-7 stories 3 stories min-5 stories max max Residential Density 40-100 36-60 24-42 du/ac Lot Coverage(max) 85% 75% 80% Front Setback 0-5 ft 0- 10 ft 0- 10 ft min/max 2 Accessory Dwelling Allowed per current City Allowed per current City Allowed per current City Ordinance Unit Allowed? Ordinance Ordinance General Uses Primarily ground floor Primarily ground floor Primarily ground floor commercial and retail Allowed commercial and retailactivity commercial and retail activity activity with a mix of uses on upper stories. with a mix of commercial, with a mix of uses on upper Medium density residential in proximity to some residential, service,and/or stories. High density civic andauto-oriented uses if the scale and office uses on upper stories. residential inproximity to character is appropriate. High density residential with some civic and auto- nearby civic uses. oriented uses if the scale and characteris appropriate. Notes: min=minimum;max=maximum;du=dwelling units;ac=acre;ft=feet 1.Lot sizes will be based on building types. 2.Side/rear setbacks will be based on building types. August 2021 27 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf Table 2 Summary of Proposed Parcel Rezoning APN Existing Land New Land Use Current Use Existing Zoning New Zoning Net Potential Use Designation Designation Designation Designation Units 20721142 Mixed Use City Corridor Commercial Medium General Urban 82 Moderate Residential 20721143 Mixed Use City Corridor Vacant Medium General Urban 51 Moderate Residential 20721144 Mixed Use City Corridor Vacant Medium General Urban 35 Moderate Residential 20721146 Mixed Use City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 13 Moderate Commercial 20810117 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 19 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20810118 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 30 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20810119 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 24 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20810120 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 180 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20815101 Mixed Use City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 28 Moderate Commercial 20815115 Mixed Use City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 13 Moderate Commercial 20832124 Medium City Corridor Vacant Medium General Urban 349 Residential Moderate Residential 20833108 Mixed Use City Corridor Vacant Commercial/Office General Urban 19 Moderate City Corridor Low Medium 20833117 Mixed Use Moderate Vacant Residential General Urban 45 City Corridor Low Medium 20833118 Mixed Use Moderate Vacant Residential General Urban 108 City Corridor Low Medium 20833123 Mixed Use Moderate Commercial General Urban 174 Residential 20833140 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Mixed Use Urban Corridor 89 20833147 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Mixed Use Urban Corridor 113 20834115 Industrial Park City Corridor High Vacant Industrial Park Urban Corridor 290 20835302 Industrial Park City Center Vacant Industrial Park Urban Center 198 20835503 Community City Corridor High Vacant Industrial Park Urban Corridor 49 Commercial 20863247 General City Corridor Vacant Community General Urban 53 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20863248 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 50 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20863249 General City Corridor Commercial Low Residential General Urban 20 Commercial Moderate 20863250 General City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 15 Commercial Moderate Commercial 20913101 Industrial Park City Corridor High Industrial Industrial Park Urban Corridor 138 20913102 Industrial Park City Corridor High Vacant Industrial Park I Urban Corridor 284 August2021 28 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf APN Existing Land New Land Use Current Use Existing Zoning New Zoning Net Potential Use Designation Designation Designation Designation Units 20949104 Industrial Park Moderate Corridor Industrial Industrial Park General Urban 58 21008141 Industrial Park City Center Vacant Industrial Park Urban Center 253 21008142 Industrial Park City Center Vacant Industrial Park Urban Center 260 22902168 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 33 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902169 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 32 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902170 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 45 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902171 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 32 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902172 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 43 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902173 General City Center Commercial Regional Related Urban Center 129 Commercial Office/Commercial 22902307 General City Corridor High Vacant General Urban Corridor 147 Commercial Commercial 22931114 Community City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 14 Commercial Commercial 22931115 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Low Residential Urban Corridor 136 107742251 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 26 107742255 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 224 107742298 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 28 107742299 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 21 107742301 Community City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor ill Commercial Commercial 107742302 Community City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 15 Commercial Commercial 107762134 Community City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 79 Commercial Moderate Commercial 107764168 Community City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 14 Commercial Moderate Commercial 107764169 Community City Corridor Commercial Community General Urban 16 Commercial Moderate Commercial 107764171 Community City Corridor High Commercial Community Urban Corridor 27 Commercial Commercial 109012117 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 199 Commercial 109012118 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 232 Commercial 109012120 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 38 Commercial 109012121 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 32 Commercial 109012122 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 40 Commercial 109012138 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 143 109012139 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Financial Urban Corridor 60 August 2021 29 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf Existing Land New Land Use Current Use Existing Zoning New Zoning Net Potential APN Use Designation Designation Designation Designation Units 109060120 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant ommuni y Urban Corridor 127 Commercial 109060121 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 31 Commercial 110016102 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 55 Commercial 110016103 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 109 Commercial 110020103 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 21 Commercial 110020104 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 22 Commercial 110020107 Mixed Use City Corridor High Vacant Community Urban Corridor 190 Commercial TOTAL 5,511 Notes: APN=Assessor's Parcel Number Based on Table 2, the project would accommodate an additional 5,511 units (5,162 low- income units and 349 above moderate income units) within the City, thereby exceeding the City's remaining RHNA requirement of 5,280 units. August 2021 30 WILSONAVE BEECH s � U J 41 Y w Uj Q O BASE LINE RD w Proposed General Plan J Q r Land Use Changes U Z W 0 City Center _ ¢ W m U City Corridor Moderate �0 O FOOTHILL BLVD ,i 0 City Corridor High ARROW RTE El B 0 z 3 LU w 6TH ST Draft, July 26, 2021 Miles 4THST City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR NOT TO SCALE , RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS FT ffl- Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations 114TERHRT19HAL 07/211 A 179819 Exhibit 5 WILSONAVE BEECH AV O J m Y W W U O BASE LINE RD W Proposed Zoning Changes ro z w General Urban m0 Urban Center �O O FOOTHILL BLVD , o �C= 0 Urban Corridor ARROW RTE a IU z Uj W 6TH ST Draft, July 26, 2021 N 0 ��4 ��2 3/4 1 Miles 4THST City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR NOT TO SCALE , RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS FT ffl- Proposed Zoning IHTERNATIaHAi 07/211 A 179819 Exhibit 6 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report The proposed project is anticipated to require the following permits and approvals: • General Plan Amendment to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to add three new zoning designations and redesignate 62 parcels from their existing land use designations to one of the new land use designations; • Development Code Amendment to establish three new zoning districts with established development standards and permitted uses for each new zoning district and remove six parcels from the Haven Avenue Overlay and one parcel from the Industrial Commercial Overlay; • Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 41 parcels within the City to one of the three new zoning districts; • Planned Community Amendment to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 parcels to the new Urban Corridor zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Corridor zoning district; • Specific Plan Amendment to amend the Victoria Specific Plan to rezone six parcels within the specific plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district; and • Master Plan Amendment to amend the Town Square Master Plan to rezone two parcels within the master plan to the new Urban Center zoning designation and establish development standards for the Urban Center zoning district. 2.3 ADDENDUM SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As discussed in the Certified EIR, implementation of the General Plan was determined to have no impact or a less than significant impact with implementation of standard conditions with regard to the following impact thresholds: • Biological Resources; • Geology and Soils; • Land Use and Planning • Population and Housing; • Public Services; • Parks and Recreation; • Transportation/Traffic; and • Utilities and Service Systems. The Certified EIR established that, with implementation of both standard conditions and mitigation measures, implementation of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to the following environmental issue areas: • Cultural Resources; August 2021 33 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf • Hazards and Hazardous Materials; • Hydrology and Water Quality; and The Certified EIR determined that significant and unavoidable impacts would occur with implementation of the General Plan related to the following environmental issue areas: • Aesthetics; • Agricultural and Forestry Resources; • Air Quality; • Greenhouse Gas Emissions; • Mineral Resources; and • Noise For all of the topical impact categories cited above, this Addendum will address the project's potential to result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts compared with the impacts disclosed in the Certified EIR. However, based on the scope, location, and existing environmental setting of the project, a more detailed analysis will be provided for the following environmental topics: Aesthetics, Air Quality; Biological Resources; Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning; Mineral Resources, Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Parks and Recreation, Transportation/Circulation; and Utilities and Service Systems. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This comparative analysis has been undertaken to analyze whether the proposed project would result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts as compared to implementation of the General Plan that was analyzed under the Certified EIR. The comparative analysis discusses whether impacts are greater than, less than, or similar to the conclusions discussed in the Certified EIR. 3.1 IMPACTS HAVING NO POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS • Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The parcels identified for redesignation and rezoning are not mapped as important farmland nor are the parcels currently designated or zoned for agriculture or forest use.' Additionally, none of the identified parcels are under a Williamson Act contract.2 Thus, the proposed project modifications would not adversely impact agriculture and forestry resources in this regard, and no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources would result from implementation of the proposed project. California Department of Conservation. Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dIrp/ciff/. Accessed July 29,2021. 2 California Department of Conservation. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land, 2017. August 2021 34 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report • Cultural Resources: The Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report (June 2020) was prepared as a supporting document to 2010 General Plan Update. The report analyzes the existing archaeological and cultural resources within the City. Based on the Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report, there are no known cultural resources that qualify for the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources on-site.3 Additionally, the project site has been disturbed by existing industrial, commercial, and residential development. No new or substantially more severe significant impacts to cultural resources would result from implementation of the proposed project. • Wildfire: As shown in Exhibit 4.8-2, Fire Hazard Severity Zones, of the Certified EIR, the proposed project area is not located within an area designated as a high fire hazard severity zone. The majority of the project area is urbanized and developed and is not adjacent to any wildland-urban interface areas. As such, no impacts relative to wildfires are anticipated. It should be noted that the Certified EIR did not include a specific analysis of wildfire as this topical area was not included in the CEQA Guidelines at the time the Certified EIR was prepared. However, a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required as a result of wildfire impacts absent new information on that front.4 Information regarding impacts related to wildfire were known long before the City certified the EIR. Thus, concerns related to these impacts could have been raised when the City considered the 2010 General Plan Update and associated EIR. Under Public Resources Code section 21166(c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved, becomes available. "`[S]ection 21166 comes into play precisely because in-depth review has already occurred [and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has long since expired ..."' (Id., 1050.) There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact, and thus the City may rely on an addendum. Accordingly, the City finds that impacts related to wildfire are not "new information" under Public Resources Code Section 21166. 3.2 IMPACTS POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS 3.2.1 AESTHETICS Future development and redevelopment in accordance with the new land use designations and zoning districts could potentially obstruct views of scenic resources within the City. Future development and redevelopment would potentially create obstructions to the views of land uses located immediately south of individual development sites. Depending on the building heights of new structures, some views of the mountains may be partially blocked, including views of the foothills at lower elevations. Compliance with the 2010 General Plan Update goals LU-8, LU-13, LU-18, LU-19, LU-20, and LU-21 would 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report, June 2020. 4 Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development (CREED) v. City of San Diego, (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 515, 531. August 2021 35 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf minimize the potential impacts to scenic vistas. However, the Certified EIR determined that, regardless of compliance with City regulations, impacts of the buildout of the 2010 General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. Future development would comply with City standards and result in similar heights and setbacks as to what is established in the Municipal Code. As such, the project impacts would not exceed the impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR. As discussed in the Certified EIR, there are no scenic highways in or near the City. As such, the project would not result in impacts to scenic highways. Future development and redevelopment pursuant to the 2010 General Plan Update would change the visual quality of individual development sites. Similarly, future development in accordance with the amended General Plan Land Use Element and Development Code could alter the visual quality and character of individual development sites. Compliance with General Plan policies LU-9.1, LU-9.3, and LU-9.5 as well as all policies under the General Plan Goal LU-11 would ensure that potential impacts related to the visual quality of each parcel would be reduced to less than significant. Additionally, compliance with and SC 4.1-8, SC 4.1-9, and SC 4.1-10 would require future development to comply with the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines for Residential/ and Commercial- Industrial land uses. Future development and redevelopment of the proposed project could introduce new sources of light and glare. However, compliance with SC-4.14 and 4.15 would require a submittal of lighting plan and solar access easements for each individual future development and redevelopment project. Additionally, the City's light and glare regulations (SC 4.1-5) prohibit the creation of areas of intense light and glare through the use of fences, walls, berms, screens, and landscaping to reduce light and glare spillover, as the City also has regulations for outdoor lighting poles and fixtures for allowable illumination and glare levels, standards for exterior lighting and lighted signs, and parking lot lighting regulations, with which all future developments would need to comply. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Overall, the proposed project would not result in additional impacts to scenic vistas, scenic highways, visual quality, or light and glare beyond what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. No new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of impacts have been identified. 3.2.2 AIR QUALITY The Certified EIR determined that the 2010 General Plan Update would not involve specific construction activities; however, Mitigation Measure 4.3-3 includes a range of construction-related measures that the City would require of each future project developed under the proposed 2010 General Plan Update. Construction emissions would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis for future development and redevelopments. August 2021 36 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf Additionally, the Certified EIR determined that long-term operation (stationary sources and mobile sources) of the 2010 General Plan Update would exceed the established significance thresholds for the criteria pollutants of PM1o, and PM2.5. Long-term operational emissions would remain significant with implementation of identified 2010 General Plan Update goals and policies, and Mitigation Measures 4.3-1 and 4.3-2. Impacts in this regard were determined to be significant and unavoidable. The 2010 General Plan Update was determined to be less than significant with regard to conflicts with an applicable Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and odors. The proposed project would introduce new land use designations and zoning districts. The proposed project would not directly involve construction activities. However, construction of future development and redevelopment projects under the proposed project would be required to implement 2010 General Plan Update Mitigation Measure 4.3-3 to reduce potential construction-related impacts to air quality. Additionally, construction emissions would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis, and would adhere to existing South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) standards to minimize construction air pollutants (dust control, emissions control features on construction equipment, idling restrictions). Therefore, no greater short-term air quality impacts would occur than that previously analyzed in the Certified EIR. Similarly, long term operations of future development projects in accordance with the amended General Plan Land Use Element and Development Code could generate operational emissions in exceedance of established thresholds. Future development would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis and would need to implement the range of standards and practices outlined in Mitigation Measures 4.3-1 and 4.3-2 of the 2010 General Plan Update. As such, the project would not result in new impacts not previously identified in the Certified EIR. 3.2.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update has the potential to impact special status species; however, compliance with General Plan Resource Conservation Element Policies RC-1.1, RC-8.1, RC 8.2, RC-8.3, and LU-8.5, and Standard Conditions SC 4.4-1, SC 4.4-2, SC 4.4-3, SC 4.4-4, and SC 4.4-5 would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Based on the Certified EIR, development associated with buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update has the potential to impact wetland areas and other natural communities; however, compliance with General Plan Resource Conservation Element Policies RC- 1.1, RC-8.1, and RC-8.2, and Standard Conditions SC 4.4-6 and SC 4.4-7 would ensure that potential impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, the Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update has the potential to disrupt wildlife movement through the loss of open space corridors; however, compliance with General Plan Resource Conservation Element Policy RC-8.4 would ensure that potential impacts would be less than significant. August 2021 37 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf Lastly, the Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update has the potential to result in removal of trees and plants protected by local and County ordinances. However, compliance with County and City codes (SC 4.4-8 and SC 4.4-9, respectively), would ensure that these impacts would be less than significant. The City is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. Thus, the Certified EIR concluded no impacts would occur in this regard. The Certified EIR concluded that with implementation of the policies in the 2010 General Plan Update and compliance with the standard conditions, no significant adverse impacts on biological resources would occur and no mitigation measures were recommended. Based on Exhibits 4.4-1 K, through 4.4-1 N, Vegetation Types, in the Certified EIR, multiple parcels identified by the proposed project are generally developed, disturbed land with pockets of vegetation including ruderal vegetation and annual brome. Additionally, as shown in Table 4.4-3, Title, of the Certified EIR, various special status wildlife species are known to occur in the General Plan area. The parcels proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed project are located in urban and built out areas of Rancho Cucamonga. Regardless, future projects would be required to undergo site-specific environmental review, during which, the project would be evaluated on a site-specific level to determine its potential to impact special-status species or sensitive communities known to occur in the area. Additionally, future development would continue to be subject to the 2010 General Plan Update standard conditions detailed in the Certified EIR. Overall, the proposed project would not result in additional impacts to biological resources beyond what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. No new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of biological resources impacts have been identified. 3.2.4 ENERGY Analysis of energy consumption generally focuses on multiple resources, including water, wind, oil, gas, coal, solar, geothermal, and nuclear resources. As discussed in Section 3.1, the Certified EIR did not include a specific analysis of energy, and a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required as a result of energy impacts absent new information on that front. However, concerns related to these impacts could have been raised when the City considered the 2010 General Plan Update and associated EIR. Under Public Resources Code section 21166(c), a supplemental environmental review is not necessary unless new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved, becomes available. As the proposed project would involve changes to the proposed land use that was analyze in the 2010 General Plan EIR and the Certified EIR, new information of potential impacts has been introduced, and further analysis is warranted. Although the project would indirectly result in fuel consumption during construction for construction employees and August 2021 38 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf equipment, the nature of project improvements would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Compliance with state energy regulations, such as California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24) and California Green (CALGreen) Building Standards, would result in efficient use in energy for future development projects. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. 3.2.5 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The Certified EIR determined that GHG emissions would result from construction activities associated with long-term implementation of land use policies in the proposed 2010 General Plan Update. The primary source of GHG emissions generated by construction activities is from use of diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e., generators, worker vehicles, materials delivery, etc.). Compliance with General Plan policies RC6.1 and PF-7.1 would add energy efficient standards to the City's Municipal Code, and adopt programs such as recycling of construction and demolition materials into future development projects. The Certified EIR determined that the buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would result in an increase in long-term GHG emissions. The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the buildout would be from motor vehicles. Other emissions would be generated from the combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off- site GHG emissions from the generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over the long term. The Certified EIR determined that implementation of the 2010 General Plan Update goals, policies, and implementation plans, as well as the Standard Conditions of Approval (SC) described above would and will result in reducing long-term GHG emissions. As such, less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. While the proposed project plans for additional future development in the City, the project itself does not propose any new development or structures. Future development projects in accordance with the proposed project would undergo site-specific environmental review on a project level, during which it would be evaluated for potential impacts related to GHG. Additionally, Standard Conditions SC 4.5-1 through 4.5-3 would apply to future development projects to reduce potential GHG impacts. As such, the proposed project would not result in additional impacts beyond what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. No new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of GHG impacts have been identified. 3.2.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The Certified EIR determined that future development in accordance with the 2010 General Plan Update would potentially be subject to seismic ground movement and ground shaking and could be exposed to ground rupture hazards, including cracks on the ground surface, building foundation and structural damage, roadway cracks, and pipeline breaks. Certified EIR Exhibit 4.7-2, Earthquake Hazard Zones, indicates that multiple parcels identified to be redesignated and rezoned under the proposed project are located within the Red Hill Fault zone. Nevertheless, compliance with General Plan Public Health and Safety Element Policies PS-5.1 and PS-5.2 as well as Standard Conditions SC 4.7- August 2021 39 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf 1, 4.7-2, 4.7-3, and 4.7-4 would reduce impacts regarding potential ground rupture and shaking to be less than significant. The Certified EIR determined that future development in the southwestern portion of the City would be subject to liquefaction hazards. Multiple parcels identified to be redesignated and rezoned under the proposed project are located within this portion of the City, and would therefore be exposed to liquefaction hazards. Compliance with Standard Condition 4.7-4 would ensure future projects conduct site-specific investigations and establish construction standards and inspection procedures to ensure that development does not pose a threat to public safety, including liquefaction hazard. As such, impacts would be less than significant with regard to liquefaction impact. The Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update has the potential to result in landslides and seismic settlement. However, with the implementation of the General Plan policy PS-5.7 and Standard Conditions 4.7-2, 4.7-3, 4.7-4, and 4.7-5 would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. As shown in Exhibit 4.17-3, Soil Association of the Certified EIR, future buildout of the proposed project would occur on different soil foundations. Additionally, parcels that would be impacted by the project are located at the ends at the northern end of the City. Therefore, future development would potentially result in landslides and seismic settlement. Compliance with City policies and standards would reduce the potential for landslides and settlement. As such, impacts to less than significant. The Delhi, Tujunga, Hanford, Cieneba, Ramona and Greenfield soils underlying the City are determined by the Certified EIR to have high erosion potential. As shown in Certified EIR Exhibit 4.7-3, parcels that would be redesignated and rezoned by the proposed project would contain these soils. Future project compliance with Standard Conditions 4.7-7 and 4.7-8 and General Plan Policies Public Health and Safety Element PS-8.3 and PS-8.4 would help reduce soil erosion from future development within each parcel. Additionally, in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), each individual project would be required to implement erosion-control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in project-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs). Thus, project impacts regarding soil erosion would be less than significant. Overall, future projects in accordance with the proposed project would be required to undergo project-specific environmental review, in which future project impacts related to geology and soils would be evaluated on a project-specific level and mitigated, as needed. Standard Conditions 4.7-4 and 4.7-9 in the Certified EIR would require future projects to prepare geotechnical evaluation reports to evaluate site-specific geologic conditions. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in additional geologic impacts than what was already analyzed in the Certified EIR. 3.2.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Hazards August 2021 40 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf Airports Although there are no airports located in the City, the Certified EIR determined that future development in the City's southern portion may extend into the navigable airspace of the Ontario International Airport and therefore, could affect aircraft landing and take-off operations. Thus, the Certified EIR concluded that future development associated with buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update in this area would need to comply with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent hazards to users, occupants, and visitors of the development and to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations (Standard Condition 4.8-9). Compliance with these regulations would allow the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to review development plans, identify/prevent potential hazards to aircraft navigation, and prevent exposure of persons or workers to aircraft hazards. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. According to Exhibit 4.8-1, Airspace Protection Areas in the Certified EIR, the parcels identified to be redesignated and rezoned are located within a designated FAA Height Notification Area for the Ontario International Airport. Within this notification area, FAR Part 77, Subpart B, requires that the FAA be notified of any proposed construction or alteration having a height greater than an imaginary surface extending 100 feet outward and one foot upward (slope of 100 to 1) for a distance of 20,000 feet from nearest point of any runway. Beyond the FAA Height Notification Area boundary, any object taller than 200 feet requires FAA notification. Future projects developed in accordance with the proposed project would be evaluated on a project-level and undergo separate environmental review. If future projects are within the FAA Height Notification Area, they would be required to comply with FAA regulations and thus, would reduce potential hazards in this regard to less than significant levels. As such, the proposed project would not result in additional impacts regarding airport hazards beyond what was already analyzed in the Certified EIR. No new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of impacts have been identified. Hazardous Materials Based on the Certified EIR, future development of the 2010 General Plan Update may include facilities that would be listed in government databases related to hazards and hazardous materials. However, compliance with existing regulations (Standard Conditions 4.8-2 through 4.8-5)would reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. According to the California Environmental Protection Agency's (CaIEPA) Cortese List,5 two voluntary cleanups occurred on two parcels included as part of the proposed project, located at 9116 East Foothill Boulevard (Former Town Center Cleaners) and 8013 Archibald Avenue (Mission Plaza Properties). Cleanup at 8013 Archibald Avenue was completed as of October 19, 2017. However, the case at 9116 East Foothill Boulevard is currently open. Future development at this location would need to comply with the 5 California Environmental Protection Agency Cortese List website, https:Hcalepa.ca.gov/ SiteCleanup/CorteseList/, accessed July 28, 2021. August 2021 41 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf following existing regulations would prevent the creation of threats to public health and safety: Hazardous Material Transportation Act (SC 4.8-1); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (SC 4.8-2), the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (SC 4.8-3), the CUPA (SC 4.8-4); and the California Accidental Release Prevention Program (SC 4.8-5). With adherence to these requirements, it is not expected the project would result in any new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of impacts related to existing hazardous materials. The proposed project would allow residential development and would not introduce any new land uses that routinely use, store, or dispose of hazardous materials. All future developments would be required to comply with existing regulations, including the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), and the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA). Compliance with these regulations would avoid the creation of a significant hazard to the public and reduce the potential for the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Additionally, all potentially significant effects resulting from the proposed project, such as those relating to hazards and hazardous materials, can be minimized through compliance with General Plan policies and Standard Conditions 4.8-1 through 4.8-9 provided in the Certified EIR. In addition, adherence to the local, State, and Federal regulatory framework would be required. No new significant impacts involving hazards and hazardous materials, or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. 3.2.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY The Certified EIR determined that future development in accordance with the 2010 General Plan Update would be required to comply with the NPDES General Construction Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities. Additionally, future development would need to comply with Mitigation Measure 4.9-3, which would require projects to prepare Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs) that identify BMPs related to water quality and runoff volumes/pollutants. The City is largely developed, with an existing storm drain system of underground lines and concrete-lined creeks. Individual development projects would need to comply with Mitigation Measures 4.9-1 and 4.9-2, which would require the project applicant to implement erosion control measures under the SWPPP and implement on-site BMPs, respectively. Individual projects would also need to comply with additional City regulations, such as Standard Conditions SC 4.9-4. The Certified EIR determined that, as new development and redevelopment introduces structures, driveways, parking lots, walkways, and other site improvements, the amount of impervious surface area in the City would increase. Thus, with the implementation of the proposed project, runoff volumes are likely to increase over existing conditions. Compliance with the General Plan Policies PS-7.1 and PS-7.2 would require the upgrade and expansion of the flood control system and maintain the flood control system and upstream tributary areas, respectively. In addition, individual development projects would be required to comply with City regulations (Standard Condition 4.9-1 and 4.9-4) as well as Mitigation Measures 4.9-3 and 4.9-4 to incorporate adequate BMPs that would August 2021 42 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf effectively prohibit non-storm water discharges from entering into the storm drain system. Lastly, future projects would be required to implement Mitigation Measures 4.9-1 and 4.9- 2 and Mitigation Measure 4.9-6 through Mitigation Measure 4.9-8 to identify appropriate methods for controlling discharge of debris and sediment into water bodies and fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides through preparation of a landscaping plan. The Certified EIR determined that multiple areas designated under the Land Use Element of the General Plan as residential uses would be located in recognized 100-year floodplains. However, compliance with Standard Conditions 4.9-4 through 4.9-6 would reduce any significant adverse impacts related to the placement of housing within a 100- year flood hazard area. The Certified EIR also determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would involve development in inundation areas of the San Antonio Dam, Cucamonga Creek, and the Alta Loma Basin. Certified EIR Exhibit 4.9-4, Dam Inundation Hazards, shows the areas within the City that are located in an inundation area. Additionally, there are multiple locations within the City that have a potential for mudflow hazards. However, compliance with Standard Conditions 4.9-4 and 4.9-10 would reduce impacts associated with flooding due to inundation by seiche or mudflow. The proposed project would introduce new land use designations and zoning districts that would result in new development. Future projects would undergo site-specific environmental review to determine impacts related to hydrology and water quality. Such projects would also be required to comply with existing regulations (e.g., NPDES Construction General Permit) and standard conditions detailed in the Certified EIR. Project-specific WQMPs and SWPPPs and associated BMPs would also be prepared to reduce impacts related to hydrology and water quality. Thus, no new significant hydrologic and water quality impacts, or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. No new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of impacts have been identified. 3.2.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING The Certified EIR determined that the 2010 General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts with regards to physically dividing established communities and conflicting with any applicable habitat conservation plan (HCP) or natural community conservation plan (NCCP). The potential for buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update to conflict with applicable land use plans adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of Standard Conditions 4.10-1 and 4.10-2 and Mitigation Measure 4.10- 1. Standard Conditions 4.10-1 and 4.10-2 require all future development projects to be consistent with the goals and policies of the 2010 General Plan Update and the Development Code standards and design guidelines. Mitigation Measure 4.10-1 requires the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department to track all development that takes place within the City against the projected densities detailed in the 2010 General Plan Update to ensure the City begins preparing an update to the General Plan prior to development reaching the established target densities. August 2021 43 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf The project proposes to redesignate and rezone parcels within the City to accommodate the City's RHNA allocation. No new development or structures are proposed and thus, the project would not physically divide any established communities within Rancho Cucamonga. Future development on the redesignated and rezoned parcels would be required to undergo project-specific environmental review, upon which each project would be evaluated on its potential to physically divide an established community. Thus, project impacts in this regard would be less than significant. The proposed project would increase the overall buildout potential for residential development within Rancho Cucamonga. While the project proposes General Plan and Development Code amendments, the project would comply with existing General Plan goals and policies related to preserving and providing residential uses. Specifically, the project would encourage more residential development in compatible neighborhoods (Policy LU-1.6); plan for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly mixed-use and high-density residential areas in strategic infill locations (Policy LU-2.1); promote infill development that contributes positively to existing residential neighborhoods (Policy LU-2.4); facilitate effective use of land constrained by challenging parcel sizes/dimensions (Policy LU-2.5); and encourage new development projects to build on vacant infill sites within built out areas and/or redevelop underutilized properties (Policy LU-3.7). Additionally, future development in accordance with the proposed project would be required to continue to comply with existing General Plan goals and policies and be consistent with Development Code standards. Further, Standard Conditions 4.10-1 and 4.10-2 would still apply to all future development projects (i.e., being consistent with the goals and policies of the 2010 General Plan Update and Development Code standards, as amended by the project). Further, implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.10-1, included in the Certified EIR, would ensure the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department continues to track development as it occurs within the City to be sure an update to the General Plan is set in motion prior to development reaching the established target densities including the additional buildout allowed by the project. There are no applicable HCP or NCCPs in the City. Thus, similar to the 2010 General Plan Update, the proposed project would not conflict with any HCP or NCCP. Further, it should be noted that this threshold regarding the potential to conflict with any HCP or NCCP under the "Land Use and Planning" topical area was removed from the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Checklist as part of the update in December 2018. Overall, no new impacts involving land use and planning, or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts in the Certified EIR would occur with implementation of the proposed project. The proposed project does not trigger new land use impacts requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR. 3.2.10 MINERAL RESOURCES The certified EIR determined that future development in accordance with the 2010 General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to existing aggregate resources. Additionally, the Certified EIR determined that potential loss of availability of these local mineral resources due to future development would result in a August 2021 44 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report less than significant impact, and adherence to Goal RC-7 and associated policies of the General Plan would further reduce the potential for impacts. As shown in Exhibit 4.11-2, Significant Aggregate Resources of the Certified EIR, parcels that would be impacted by the proposed project are not located in any aggregate resource centers. However, as shown in Exhibit 4.11-1, Mineral Land Classification of the Certified EIR, the majority of the project site is located in mineral land classification MRZ-2. Therefore, significant mineral deposits may be present within the project site. The parcels proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed project are located in urban and built out areas of Rancho Cucamonga. Future development would also need to comply with Goal RC-7 and associated policies to further reduce potential impacts. As such, operational mineral resource impacts would be less than significant. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. 3.2.11 NOISE Short-term construction noise impacts were determined to be less than significant in the Certified EIR with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.12-1 through 4.12-4, and compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance as provided in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, Noise Standards. Similarly, the Certified EIR determined that operational noise impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.12-5 through 4.12-7. A portion of the proposed project is located within a designated FAA Height Notification Area for Ontario International Airport, located approximately four miles to the southwest, and is therefore subject to FAA requirements regarding notification. The proposed project does not propose development or redevelopment of residential or other land uses that would impact sensitive receptors. However, implementation of the proposed project would potentially result in development or redevelopment of residential or other land uses within close proximity to sensitive receptors. Future projects would be required to undergo separate environmental review at a project-level to determine potential noise-related impacts from construction and operational activities. Further, future development would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 of the Certified EIR and prepare a noise mitigation plan to negate any potentially significant impacts resulting from construction noise. Short-term construction noise associated with future development would also be required to implement Mitigation Measures 4.12-1 4.12-2, and 4.12-4 of the Certified EIR, as well as comply with General Plan Policies PS- 13.1 through PS-13.11 and PS-14.1 through PS-14.2 from the Certified EIR and comply with the City's Noise Control Ordinance to reduce potential noise impacts. Similarly, future development projects would be subject to individual environmental review regarding operational noise impacts. Future development and redevelopment projects would be required to comply with Mitigation Measures 4.12-5 through 4.12-7 of the Certified EIR to ensure that operations of their development would not exceed the noise thresholds and standards imposed by the City. As such, operational noise impacts would be less than significant. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. August 2021 45 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf 3.2.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING The Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would not result in an increase in the overall population growth of the City. However, the Certified EIR determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would indirectly increase the City's population, housing stock, and employment base by providing capacity to accommodate future development. Exceedances of SCAG projections for population, households, and employment are expected, which may have the potential for a significant impact based on the rate of future development proposals and entitlements. Additionally, the increase in the jobs/housing ratio at buildout may create more traffic congestion. The Certified EIR also determined that buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would not result in the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing. The proposed project would allocate RHNA units as part of its planning and zoning framework in order to meet State RHNA requirements. The proposed project would not exceed the City's buildout capacity of 63,261 housing units. Additionally, the project would comply with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and provide an adequate number of residential units that would sustain the City's planned population growth. As such, the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts. No new mitigation measures are required. 3.2.13 PUBLIC SERVICES The Certified EIR determined that, although buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would create additional demand for fire and police protection services, the City's general fund or other existing funding mechanisms would reduce the impacts to these services. Buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would result in an additional demand for schools and public libraries. Future development and redevelopment projects would need to comply with Standard Conditions 4.14-1 and 4.14-2, which would require the project to comply with all applicable state and local regulations codes, ordinances and standard conditions, as well as pay applicable developer's fees to impacted school districts. Additionally, future development and redevelopment projects would need to comply with the General Plan Policies PF 3.1 through PF 3.6 to ensure that impacts to library services would be less than significant. As discussed in Section 3.2.10, the proposed project would potentially result in an indirect increase in the City's overall population. This in turn would result in an increase in the demand for public services. Future development and redevelopment resulting from the proposed project would comply with Standard Conditions 4.14-1 and 4.14-2 as well as the General Plan Policies PF 3.1 through PF 3.6. With compliance to these standards and regulations, the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to public services. No new mitigation measures are required. 3.2.14 PARKS AND RECREATION The Certified EIR determined that the buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update could lead to an increase in the City's population, and therefore increase the usage and demand for parks and recreational facilities. The City's Local Park Ordinance requires developers of residential projects to dedicate land and/or pay in-lieu fees for the provision of August 2021 46 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report parklands at a standard of 3 to 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents (SC 4.15-2). Residential development and redevelopment would also provide on-site recreational areas and facilities, as required by the City's Development Code (SC 4.15-1). As discussed, the proposed project would potentially result in an indirect increase in the City's overall population. As a result, the usage parks and recreational facilities within the would potentially increase. Future development would comply with City standards and pay the required fees for the provision of parklands. With compliance to these standards, the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to parks and recreational facilities. No new mitigation measures are required. 3.2.15 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Based on the Certified EIR, buildout of the General Plan would increase traffic volumes in the City, leading to four intersections operating at LOS E or worse by 2030 (Rochester Avenue at Arrow Highway [LOS F in PM peak hour], Etiwanda Avenue at Foothill Boulevard [LOS E in PM peak hour], Etiwanda Avenue at Arrow Highway [LOS F in PM peak hour], and East Avenue at Base Line Road [LOS E in PM peak hour]), as well as increasing the potential for traffic accidents. Improvements at these intersections would allow the deficient intersections to operate at LOS D or better. Further, future development and redevelopment under the General Plan would have to provide emergency access. Standard Conditions 4.16-1 through 4.16-5 would ensure improvement of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic volumes, prevent traffic hazards, and provide for continued emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. Conflicts with Applicable Plans, Ordinances or Policies Establishing Measures of Effectiveness for the Performance of the Circulation System Short-term construction traffic impacts associated with General Plan implementation were determined to be less than significant in the Certified EIR with implementation of Standard Condition 4.16-2. Similarly, the Certified EIR determined that operational traffic impacts associated with General Plan implementation would be less than significant with implementation of Standard Conditions 4.16-3 through 4.16-9. No significant, unavoidable impacts relative to transportation/circulation would occur with implementation of future development envisioned in the General Plan. As discussed above, the proposed project would allocate RHNA units as part of its planning and zoning framework in order to meet State RHNA requirements. The proposed project would not exceed the City's buildout capacity of 63,261 housing units. Additionally, the project would comply with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and provide an adequate number of residential units that would sustain the City's planned population growth. Furthermore, applicants for individual developments would be required to comply with Standard Condition 4.16-1 and prepare a traffic study addressing the additional trips resulting from the development. Compliance with Standard Condition 4.16-2 would ensure improvement of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic volumes. As such, impacts regarding the for the performance of the circulation system would be less than significant. August 2021 47 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf The State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR), in implementing Senate Bill (SB) 743, issued proposed updates to the CEQA guidelines in November 2017 that amends the Appendix G question for transportation impacts to delete reference to vehicle delay and level of service (LOS) and instead refer to Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines asking if the project would result in a substantial increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the revisions to the CEQA Guidelines in December of 2018, and as of July 1, 2020 the provisions of the new section are in effect statewide. The revisions of the CEQA guideline were not taken into account in determining the impact of the buildout of 2010 General Plan Update, as these changes to the CEQA guidelines occurred after the Certified EIR was published. It should be noted that the traffic impacts of future development would be evaluated based on the VMT metric, on a site-specific basis as future developments associated with the proposed project are proposed. Public Transit/Alternative Transportation Modes The Certified EIR promotes alternative transportation systems through Goals CM-1, CM- 2, CM-3, and supporting policies. Future development and redevelopment associated with General Plan implementation would need to comply with Standard Conditions 4.16- E and 4.16-7, which would provide facilities for alternative modes of transportation. Implementation of Standard Conditions 4.16-8 and 4.16-9 would also encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. Should future development and redevelopment of the proposed project result in roadway improvements, individual development projects would comply with City standards related to sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and public transit opportunities. Since the proposed project constitutes minor, technical changes to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the City's Development Code, the project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of identified impacts relative to public transit/alternative transportation modes. Therefore, no conflict with policies, plans and programs for alternative transportation would occur beyond what was previously analyzed in the Certified EIR. Emergency Access The Certified EIR determined that emergency access impacts associated with General Plan implementation would be less than significant. Compliance with Standard Condition 4.16-2, which includes Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and the standards in the Work Area Protection and Traffic Control Manual, would maintain emergency access to individual parcels at all times. The Manual states that the needs of emergency service providers (law enforcement, fire, and medical) should be assessed and appropriate coordination and accommodations made. Thus, notification of the Rancho Cucamonga Police and Fire Departments of potential roadway closures and construction work would allow for the use of alternative routes by emergency vehicles and would avoid adverse impacts to emergency response and access. Also, as provided for in Standard Condition 4.14-3, compliance with the requirements for emergency lane width, vertical clearance, and distance would ensure that adequate emergency access is August 2021 48 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf available for all future projects associated with General Plan implementation. Future development and redevelopment projects resulting from the proposed project would be required to comply with the regulations set forth of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and comply with the Standard Conditions 4.16-2 and 4.16-3. As such, the project would not result in impacts to emergency access greater than what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. Design Hazards/Incompatible Uses The Certified EIR determined that a less than significant impact would occur relative to design hazards and incompatible uses. Roadway improvements would have to be made in accordance with the City's Circulation Plan, roadway functional design guidelines, access and circulation design guidelines, and intersection line-of-sight design guidelines, as provided for in Standard Condition 4.16-4. The Certified EIR concluded that impacts relative to traffic hazards would be less than significant. As a land use and development code amendment, the proposed project would not directly result in design hazards and incompatible uses. Compliance with Standard Condition 4.16-4 would reduce the potential for design hazards and incompatible uses by future development. No new significant impacts involving transportation/circulation, or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts, would occur with implementation of the proposed project beyond what was previously analyzed within the Certified EIR. 3.2.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Impacts to tribal cultural resources by the buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update were not analyzed by the Certified EIR. Under Public Resources Code section 21166(c), a supplemental environmental review is not necessary unless new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved, becomes available. The parcels proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed project are located in urban and built out areas of the City. Regardless, future projects would be required to undergo site-specific environmental review, during which projects would need to comply with California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) and establish formal a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. August 2021 49 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf 3.2.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS The project would involve amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element and the Development Code, and the rezoning of 62 parcels. As such, the project would not directly impact the existing utility and service systems. Future development and redevelopment projects of the project would include the development of parcels that are currently vacant; refer to Table 2. Development of these parcels would result in the installation of new connecting utility lines and an increase in the demand for water, wastewater, solid waste and dry utility services. Water Supply and Infrastructure As discussed above, future development and redevelopment of the proposed project would result in the construction of new connecting water lines and potentially and increase in demand for water. As such, future development and redevelopment projects would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis under separate environmental review and may be subject to SB 610 and/or SB 221 and comply with all applicable requirements in order to demonstrate the availability of an adequate and reliable water supply (Standard Condition 4.17-1). With compliance to these standards and regulations, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Wastewater Infrastructure and Treatment The Certified EIR determined that the buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to wastewater facilities. As an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the proposed project would not directly impact the existing wastewater facilities that are servicing the City. However, development and redevelopment of the project would potentially increase the existing development and increase the demand for wastewater services. As stated in Section 3.2.7, future development projects would need to comply with all applicable NPDES Permit rules and regulations (Standard Condition 4.17-2). Future development projects would also need to individually submit a water and sewer plan to the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), proving that the project would be designed and constructed to meet CVWD requirements (Standard Condition 4.17-3). Compliance to existing standards would reduce impacts to be less than significant. Dry Utilities According to the Certified EIR, private companies that serve the City, such as Southern California Edison (SCE), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), Charter Communications (Charter) and Time Warner Cable (Time Warner) are private companies that provide services on demand. Therefore, no significantly adverse impacts on their services are expected. Future development projects would need to coordinate with individual utility agencies with service connections. The individual project developer would be required to comply with Standard Conditions 4.15 through 4.17-7, and would be responsible for the for relocation of onsite utilities. Additionally, individual future August 2021 50 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Reporf development projects would be required by the City to implement all applicable Title 24 energy efficiency standards regarding natural gas and electricity usage (Standard Condition 4.17-4). As such impacts to dry utilities services and facilities would be less than significant. Solid Waste The Certified EIR determined that the buildout of the 2010 General Plan Update would result in an estimated net increase in solid waste disposal of 201.5 tons per day and 73,545 tons per year. This increase would represent a nominal percentage of the existing landfills that service the City's permitted capacity. The proposed project would result in changes to land use designations within the General Plan Land Use Element as well as the City's existing zoning code. These changes would result in changes to the build out of 2010 General Plan Update, and would potentially result in changes to future development. The project would not impact the City's compliance with State law(AB939), which requires a 50 percent diversion of solid waste from landfills. Additionally, the project would comply with the General Plan Update's Goal PF-7 and Policies PF-7.1 through PF- 7.5, which state the City's aim to minimize the volume of solid waste that enters regional landfills and encourage recycling. Therefore, with continuing adherence to the requirements of AB 939 and SIB 1016 and implementation of the identified goal and related policies in the proposed 2010 General Plan Update, impacts regarding solid waste would be less than significant. 4.0 DETERMINATION/ADDENDUM CONCLUSION As detailed in the analysis above, this Addendum supports the conclusion that the modifications to the General Plan Land Use Element and Development Code are considered minor technical changes, and do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed project would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. August 2021 51 General Plan and Development Code Amendments Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report 5.0 ADDENDUM PREPARATION SOURCES/REFERENCES California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/, accessed on July 29, 2021. California Department of Conservation. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land, 2017. California Environmental Quality Act, 1970, as amended. Public Resources Code Sections 15162 — 15164. California Environmental Protection Agency Cortese List website, https://calepa.ca.gov/ SiteCleanup/CorteseList/, accessed July 28, 2021. Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development (CREED) v. City of San Diego, (2011) 196 Cal.AppAth 515, 531. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report, June 2020. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, 2010. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, 2010. August 2021 52 RESOLUTION NO. 21-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF (1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2021-00281 TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO ADD THREE NEW ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND REDESIGNATE 62 PARCELS FROM THEIR EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO ONE OF THE NEW LAND USE DESIGNATIONS; (2) MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00281 TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ESTABLISH THREE NEW ZONING DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PERMITTED USES FOR EACH NEW ZONING DISTRICT AND REMOVE 6 PARCELS FROM THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY AND 1 PARCEL FROM THE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY; (3) ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2021-00283 TO REZONE 41 PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY TO ONE OF THE THREE NEW ZONING DISTRICTS, (4) PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT DRC2021-00284 TO AMEND THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY TO REZONE 13 PARCELS TO THE NEW URBAN CORRIDOR ZONING DESIGNATION AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE URBAN CORRIDOR ZONING DISTRICT; (5) SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2021-00285 TO AMEND THE VICTORIA SPECIFIC PLAN TO REZONE 6 PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN TO THE NEW URBAN CENTER ZONING DESIGNATION AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT; (6) MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2021-00286 TO AMEND THE TOWN SQUARE MASTER PLAN TO REZONE 2 PARCELS WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN TO THE NEW URBAN CENTER ZONING DESIGNATION AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT; AND (7) AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED EIR FOR THE 2010 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a set of amendments, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "the Amendments". 2. On August 11, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Exhibit G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 GPA, MCA, ZMA, PCA, SPA, MPA— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 11, 2021 Page 2 Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City is required by law to update its housing element that covers the planning period of October 2021 through October 2029; b. The City is currently in the process of updating the housing element as part of the PlanRC General Plan process and is currently on track to adopt the new General Plan, including the housing element, later this year; C. Current housing law states that if cities cannot show that it has the capacity to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based on its existing planning and zoning framework, the city is considered to have a "shortfall" in capacity; d. The City is proposing to amend its current General Plan, Development Code, Zoning Map and related special planning documents for selected parcels to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021 and to avoid the shortfall; e. The City prepared the Amendments, which are included as Attachments A through F to this Resolution and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full; f. Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00281 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 conform to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof (as amended), and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan; g. The Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are also consistent with the proposed Planning Community, Specific Plan, and Master Plan amendments included herein. h. General Plan Amendment DRC2021-00281 would be internally consistent with the remainder of the General Plan; i. Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021-00285, and Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286 would be consistent with the General Plan, as amendment; and j. The Planning Commission finds that the Amendments serve the important purpose of providing sufficient opportunities for housing development within the City to meet demand at all income levels in accordance with its assigned RHNA. 3. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed changes do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed project would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 GPA, MCA, ZMA, PCA, SPA, MPA— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 11, 2021 Page 3 environmental review. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Department staff's determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed addendum. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2021-00281 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00282 as indicated in Attachment B incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 as indicated in Attachment C incorporated herein by this reference. 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284 as indicated in Attachment D incorporated herein by this reference. 8. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021-00285 as indicated in Attachment E incorporated herein by this reference. 9. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 10. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11T" DAY OF AUGUST 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 GPA, MCA, ZMA, PCA, SPA, MPA— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 11, 2021 Page 4 I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11t" day of August 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: i l � `II i �r Chapter 2: gingy ManaLand Use, CommunityDesign, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Introduction Chapter 2: Rancho Cucamonga enjoys a wealth of high-quality resources. Through the City's Managing Land Use, strategic development efforts to provide a sustainable balance of residential, Community Design, and commercial, industrial, and recreational uses, the City has grown and prospered. Historic Resources Land use planning ensures that these land uses are located in proximity to each other to achieve economic efficiencies while minimizing incompatibilities. Following This Chapter consists of the the boom period of the early 2000s that resulted in an 87 percent build-out of the following sections: City, a dramatic slowdown in development occurred. As Rancho Cucamonga • Land Use achieves a degree of maturity, the primary challenge for land use planning will be to determine the best use for remaining infill properties. A second challenge will be to • Community Design guide re-use of aging commercial properties for long-term community and property . Historic Resources owner benefit. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-1 Community design is integral to balancing aesthetic qualities and functionality for the many different land uses, which are required of a complete community. Such balance is necessary to maintain and enhance a community that is highly enjoyable for living, working, and recreation. In Rancho Cucamonga, a strong emphasis on community design has allowed the City to achieve a particular identity, incorporating the history and character qualities of the three communities that preceded it: Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda. Preservation of historic resources has allowed Rancho Cucamonga to retain its rich culture and heritage while facing growing and expanding development. The City is committed to preserving and developing aspects of the community that provide a sense of its origin and history. This Chapter focuses on land use, community design, and historic resources, and how they help shape the physical features of Rancho Cucamonga. Achieving Our Vision Rancho Cucamonga's stable residential neighborhoods, diverse commercial and industrial development, extensive parks and recreational facilities, and high-quality community amenities can be attributed to the City's long-standing commitment to land use planning and urban design. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's vision for land use, community design, and historic resources is reflected in the following Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga Guiding Principles: The Spirit of Family ■ Rancho Cucamonga is a people-first community with a focus on families. We strive to create an environment that leads to stable and healthy families. ■ We continue to develop and maintain a system of high-quality, world-class community parks and sports complexes that appeal to all ages and all interests, from local and regional leagues to national events. ■ We encourage the retention, rehabilitation, and development of a diverse housing stock that caters to residents in all stages of their lives. The Spirit of Innovation and Enterprise ■ We maximize the industrial economic development power of our rail and highway connections. The Foothill Boulevard, State Route 210, and 1-15 corridors are the core of our commercial development and provide both jobs for our families and revenues for our community services. Our economic base maintains a mix of cultural, residential, industrial, and local and regional commercial uses with stable development. ■ As we mature as a City, infill development will maintain our high standards and will complement existing development. The Spirit of Heritage ■ We have an abiding respect for the heritage we share. Our historic communities—Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda —are at the heart of our City and must be preserved, honored, and enhanced. We encourage the preservation and restoration of historical buildings and cultural resources to recognize the contributions of our forefathers. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN ■ Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) is the historic thread that ties our community together. We must continually revitalize the corridor while telling the story of the past and balancing preservation. This will be done through the adaptive re- use of buildings, strong architectural design, and public art. ■ We promote the use of citrus and vineyard plantings to remind us of our agricultural past. ■ Our outstanding views of the mountains, the varied natural topography of the area, and the trails that allow us to access these open spaces are assets and must be preserved. The Spirit of Leadership ■ We have a strong dedication to community planning. The quality of our built environment is by design. Our government leads by example. We are committed to achieving higher standards for community development, architecture, and landscaping. Our streetscapes reflect the high-quality development that we demand while embracing the concept of water conservation and ease of maintenance. ■ We promote sustainable neighborhood and building design. The Spirit of Tomorrow ■ We are dedicated to a sustainable balance in land use patterns (residential, business, educational, agricultural, recreational, open space, and historic uses) and supporting transportation. ■ We are proactive in the design and use of lands within our Sphere of Influence, being vigilant in maintaining open space wherever possible. ■ We continue to provide a stable City government which respects the decisions of the past while being committed to long-range planning initiatives and the positive impacts of future development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-3 Land Use In Rancho Cucamonga, vacant land has become a scarce resource. Land use decisions must be carefully crafted to protect established residential neighborhoods and plan for appropriate infill development while connecting land uses and transportation modes. These key objectives provide the framework for the City's land use strategies. Land use is a term that describes different types of activities that occur in a particular area. For example, some areas in Rancho Cucamonga contain homes while other areas contain stores, warehouses, parks, or schools. In some places, like Victoria Gardens, a mixture of uses creates an active and vital commercial and cultural center. This Land Use section describes the general location, type, and intensity of development throughout Rancho Cucamonga. The maps, graphics, and text in this section also define the distribution, intensity, and preferred form of land uses within residential neighborhoods, along key corridors, and on specific sites. The Land Use Policy Map (Figure LU-1) presents a pictorial representation of land use policy. Cumulatively, these policies will shape future development to maintain and enhance all areas of Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Context The pattern of development within Rancho Cucamonga is characterized by essentially a north/south split roughly along Foothill Boulevard. The northern two- thirds of the City are predominately residential, while the southern third is largely industrial. Commercial centers are primarily clustered along Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, and several other major roadways. The northern edge of the Sphere of Influence is dominated by open space and hillside terrain. Table LU-1 identifies the land use distribution for the City and Sphere of Influence by general categories as of 2009. Table LU-1: Land Use Distribution - 2009 � Sphere of Land Use city Influence Total Percent of Acres Acres Total Acres Residential 10,310 125 10,435 39.3% Commercial 660 -- 660 2.5% Mixed Use 702 -- 702 2.6% Industrial 3,203 -- 3,203 12.1% Public Facilities 1,656 1,448 3,104 11.7% Schools 536 -- 536 2.0% Parks 347 -- 347 1.3% Open Space and Conservation 707 1,186 1,893 7.1% Vacant 2,503 3,168 5,671 21.4% Total 20,624 5,927 26,551 100.0% Source:Rancho Cucamonga GIS data,2009. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN The residential character of Rancho Cucamonga can be described as primarily low- density and consisting of high-quality, stable neighborhoods. Most residential uses located in the northern areas include large lot, detached homes. The lots become gradually smaller south of Banyan Street. Higher-density housing such as townhomes, condominiums, and apartment complexes are located in the central portion of the City, in the Terra Vista and Victoria neighborhoods. Commercial uses vary greatly, from regional shopping centers to smaller neighborhood retail stores. Regional-serving commercial uses can be found on Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue, and at Victoria Gardens, located between Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and 1-15. Neighborhood shopping centers are distributed throughout the City and can be found at most major intersections. Many older neighborhood shopping centers located in the western portion of the City are struggling with vacancies, financial instability, and physical decay. Some of these centers may need revitalization or facelifts. Industrial uses range from heavy industrial such as Tamco Steel and Mission Foods, to warehouses, distribution centers, and light industrial that includes business parks and office uses. Most of the industrial uses are located south of Foothill Boulevard, with the heavy industrial uses located on both sides of 1-15. Retail uses at Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. i Modern and attractive office buildings along Haven Avenue. I . ; I Iry Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-5 Public facilities include government buildings such as City Hall, fire stations, and multi-purpose community facilities. Also included in this category are infrastructure such as cellular towers; water, gas, and electrical transmission lines; electrical plants and facilities; water district facilities; and flood control facilities (catch basins, levees, storm drainage channels, and spreading basins). Rancho Cucamonga is a community that supports life-long learning with four elementary school districts (Alta Loma, Central, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda), one high school district (Chaffey Joint Union High School District), one community college (Chaffey College), and satellite facilities for other institutions of higher learning (University of La Verne and University of Redlands are examples). These facilities are distributed throughout the community. One of the City's most attractive assets is Rancho Cucamonga's world-class park system. The system features facilities throughout the community designed to meet the needs of residents of all ages. Preserving open space for environmental and aesthetic value is a primary objective of the General Plan. Open space can serve multiple functions such as groundwater recharge, wildlife corridors, and neighborhood connections. The largest significant open space remains within the City's Sphere of Influence. Many vacant lands have already been entitled for development but construction has not occurred. These parcels will continue to contribute to the community in the future through thoughtful design and development. Land Use Growth Strategy The General Plan reinforces established land uses attained in the City over the last 10 to 15 years by emphasizing protection of existing residential neighborhoods, and targeting of new residential, office, and commercial growth along major corridors, such as Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard, where development opportunities exist on vacant or underutilized properties. The land use growth strategy will focus on the following three objectives: ■ Protect and maintain established residential neighborhoods ■ Target new infill development opportunities ■ Integrate land use and transportation Protection of Established Residential Neighborhoods The City's neighborhoods reflect the history, strength, and character of Rancho Cucamonga, and the General Plan continues the City's practice of protecting, maintaining, and enhancing established residential neighborhoods. New development will be required to complement and reinforce the unique character of each neighborhood through sensitive infill projects and transitions in scale of development. Existing neighborhoods are stable and provide good access to parks and schools. The City is committed to fostering strong, safe, and vibrant neighborhoods, and ensuring that parks and schools are connected to a comprehensive trails and sidewalk pedestrian system. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN I� R Residence on Etiwanda Avenue. - IN `V � a - M..�. nab_�..� • - :��T�Y.. 011 Y 1 Infill Development Between 1999 and 2009, development largely occurred in the northeast Etiwanda portion of the City and around the Terra Vista and Victoria neighborhoods. In fact, most of those neighborhoods are now fully developed. However, many small opportunity areas remain, and vacant lots are located throughout the City where new development can take place. Struggling commercial shopping centers also present opportunities for revitalization. Successful infill development is characterized by overall residential densities that support public transit and commercial districts that offer a wider variety of convenience services and amenities. Well-planned infill can create cultural, social, recreational, and entertainment opportunities, gathering places, and bring vitality to historic roadway corridors (e.g., Foothill Boulevard) and neighborhoods. Attention to the design of infill development is essential to ensure that the new development fits in with the established physical context and gains acceptance from surrounding residential neighborhoods. A cooperative partnership between government, the development community, neighborhood organizations, and other resources is essential to achieve infill success. Successful infill development has already occurred. For example, the Town Square development at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard has integrated residential and commercial development. u== 7/ The Town Square development integrates R commercial and residential development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-7 Infill development can provide the following benefits: ■ Responds to the Needs of the Community. Infill can contribute to unmet economic, social, or civic needs in the community. Through sensitive design, infill can introduce new development into the community and achieve a balanced mix of well-designed housing types, sizes, and prices for all income levels, in combination with a variety of commercial and/or civic and cultural uses. ■ Appearance and Viability. Infill development can be designed to complement surrounding development, create connected and sociable places, and ultimately increase property values. Infill development can address gaps in the existing community structure, provide for continuity and enclosure of the streetscape, and add elements that give a place definition and security. ■ Walkability. Infill development can enhance circulation and walkability of a community by replacing vacant, deserted sites with revitalized businesses that relate to the surrounding neighborhood through street-friendly and pedestrian-friendly design. ■ Infrastructure. Infill development capitalizes on existing infrastructure and minimizes the need for costly new improvements. Although some infrastructure may require upgrading to meet new demand, the broader community is likely to benefit from those improvements. ■ Access to Healthy Food. In connection with the City's commitment to a Healthy Mind, Body, and Earth, the City recognizes the need to support land uses that improve access to healthy food in the community. Community gardens, school gardens, farmers' markets, and edible estates have a unique purpose, function, and placement within the community. They provide a means for the community to enjoy the benefits of land uses that will produce healthier food choices while gaining social, cultural, and fitness benefits as well. Refer to Chapter 5: Community Services, for additional information. Land Use and Transportation Connections An important component of the General Plan is its focus on connecting all areas of See the Community the City with transportation options. Transportation options may include bus or shuttle Mobility Chapter for a transit, walking, and bicycling. In the Alta Loma and Etiwanda communities, discussion of complete equestrian travel is a transportation option as well. streets and a comprehensive bikeways Undisputedly, Rancho Cucamonga is dependent on the automobile as the primary plan. mode of transportation, whether cars are used to go from home to work, school, shopping, or elsewhere in the community. However, the General Plan incorporates greater transportation options, such as walking and transit, particularly through infill and Mixed Use development. For example, residents living in a new Mixed Use development should not only be able to walk a few blocks to grab a bite to eat or get a cup of coffee, but also to access a transit line. The General Plan includes planning for new trails that link established residential neighborhoods and connect them with shopping centers, employment areas, and schools and parks. The Pacific Electric Trail will serve as an important east-west connector to the City's comprehensive trail network. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Land Use Plan The Land Use Plan guides the development, maintenance, and improvement of land and properties in Rancho Cucamonga. The Land Use Plan, illustrated in Figure LU-2 and described below, will allow the City to both preserve the unique qualities that define Rancho Cucamonga and forge a new path toward a sustainable future. Rancho Cucamonga actively works toward creating a community with a balanced mix of land uses that fosters economic, environmental, and social sustainability. The City continues to lead Inland Empire cities in testing new ideas that support emerging business practices and lifestyle trends, such as high-density housing and flexible business space. New approaches to land use planning and development are driven by the need to create connections between land use and transportation choices, and to achieve more sustainable development approaches. Density and Intensity Density and intensity are quantitative measures used to describe how much development may occur on a property. For residential uses, the term "density" is used. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan describes density in terms of the number of dwelling units allowed per net acre (du/acre), exclusive of streets and public rights-of-way. For nonresidential land use categories (e.g., commercial or industrial), the term "intensity" is used. Development intensity addresses the amount of building square footage that is on a particular parcel or lot. Intensity can be described in many ways, including total building square footage, the percent of the lot the building occupies, the mass of a building, or floor-area ratio. The General Plan uses floor-area ratio, or FAR, to measure nonresidential intensity. FAR is the ratio of the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot to the total net area of the lot. It does not include the area within parking structures (see Figure LU-1). _ Figure LU-1: Floor-Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5 FAR 1.0 FAR 0.5 FAR Example: Gross Building Area(all floors) 50,000 sq. ft. FAR= 0.5FAR= Lot Area 100,000 sq. ft. The determination of development intensity or density at which a proposed project can occur is a function of: 1) General Plan policies intended to maximize public safety, achieve high-quality site planning and design, retain significant natural Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-9 resources, and ensure compatibility between uses; and 2) development standards contained in the Development Code, public works standards, and other City regulations. Residential Designations Six residential land use designations are established to preserve the character of existing residential neighborhoods and to create opportunities for new housing types. While residential uses are the primary permitted uses, other complementary and compatible uses can be entitled as Development Code regulations permit, such as parks, trails, special residential uses addressed by State law, child care facilities, schools, and places of religious assembly. Each of the residential use categories includes a range of allowable densities. The maximum density defines the maximum number of units -mI�I' per net acre at which development can occur within a given area. The �,-"� determination of precise density, development location, and lot coverage on any residential property is a function of: 1) the provisions of the General Plan that are intended to maximize public safety, achieve high- quality site planning and design, retain significant natural resources, and ensure compatibility between uses; and 2) the building and development Very Low Residential standards contained in the Development Code, public works standards, and other applicable regulations and ordinances. _-_ Very Low Residential (0.10 to 2.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Very Low Residential designation is characterized by detached, very low-density single residential units on 0.5-acre lots or larger, with private yards and private parking. This designation generally applies to the foothill areas north of Banyan Street and north of the Pacific Electric Trail in the Etiwanda area. There are some areas below Banyan Street that are also required to meet the same requirements as the Equestrian/Rural Low Residential Overlay area (see Land Use Overlay discussion below). New development is required to provide community and local trails for equestrian use in accordance with the Hiking and Riding Trails Plan, the Trail Implementation Plan, and the Equestrian/Rural Area Overlay `o- District. Typical population density is 1-6 persons per acre. Low Residential (2.0 to 4.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) - The Low Residential designation is characterized by detached, low- density single residential units on individual lots forming a cohesive neighborhood, with private yards and private parking. Typical population -- density is 6-13 persons per acre. Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4.0 to 8.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Low Medium Residential designation is characterized by detached or attached housing structures that contain either one or two individual dwelling units, such as single-unit zero-lot-line homes, cluster and patio homes, and duplexes. All development approaches include private, individually accessible parking for each unit. Development of townhomes at the upper end of the range may be suited to locations near .:. commercial areas and along major arterials. This designation - encourages housing diversity without changing the low-intensity character of the neighborhood. Typical population density is 13-26 Medium Residential persons per acre. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Figure LU-2: Land Use Plan (11x17) Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-11 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Medium Residential (8.0 to 14.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Medium Residential designation is characterized by detached and attached residential units, including small-lot subdivisions, duplexes and triplexes, and attached townhouse-type developments that provide private open space and multi- unit structures that comprise a cohesive development incorporating common open space areas. Mobile home parks are also allowed in this designation. Residential units may contain private yards and private parking or open common areas and shared parking. Building intensity at the lower end of the density range is suitable adjacent to low and very low-density residential areas. Typical population density is 26-45 persons per acre. Building intensity at the higher end of the range is more appropriate adjacent to parks, along transit routes and arterial roads, and near activity - -`_ _ �■ centers. Development at the higher densities normally consists of a semi- n _ detached or attached unit design. The Medium Residential designation _` also serves as an appropriate buffer between low-density residential areas and areas of higher-density commercial activities. r -- Medium High Residential (14.0 to 24.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Medium High Residential designation is characterized by low-rise Medium High Residential condominiums and apartment buildings. Approaches to development may consist of multiple-unit buildings or groups of buildings, with both private F . and common open space areas provided. This density is appropriate near y ,~ major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability. Typical population density is 45-77 persons per acre. High Residential (24.0 to 30.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The High Residential designation is characterized by higher-density, multi- story residential development with a focus on providing an urban intensity and function at locations within walking distance to transit, recreation and community facilities, employment centers, and commercial services. Development typically is characterized by buildings between three to six High Residential stories in height and with open common areas. On-site amenities for residents are provided. Typical population density is 77-97 persons per acre. Commercial Designations Four commercial designations establish opportunities for varied commercial business enterprises. Commercial areas provide places where residents and visitors can shop for goods and services, and where businesses can locate to serve local, regional, and international markets. Each of the non-residential designations indicates a probable and maximum level of development intensity. The building intensity is measured according to the FAR. The FAR describes the intensity of the use on a site and not the building height or site coverage. It does not include the area within parking structures. The lower number in the FAR range indicates the probable FAR on average r ,e but in some cases, it may be lower. The higher number is the maximum FAR for any specific project. The FAR is applied to the r I gross acreage of a project or lot, less that portion of the site to be dedicated to arterial highways, flood control channels, and easements, as defined in the Community Mobility Chapter. rl+ Office Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-13 Office (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The Office designation concentrates office-oriented business activities near centers of commercial activity and avoids the building of individual, isolated office buildings. Office developments may include low-rise, multi-tenant garden-type arrangements, particularly along the 1-15 corridor, Haven Avenue Office Overlay district, and within Mixed Use designated areas. Business activities permitted within this category include corporate headquarters, administrative and professional offices, finance, legal, insurance, real estate services, banks, and business support services. Supportive convenience retail and service commercial uses such as restaurants may also be allowed to serve the needs of employees and visitors. Neighborhood Commercial (Probable FAR of 0.25 and Maximum FAR of 0.35) The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (5 to 15 acres in size) located near or within residential neighborhoods and offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses include small-scale restaurants, grocery and convenience stores, service businesses that generate limited traffic, and boutique retail sales. Neighborhood _ Commercial centers should be compatible in design and a: . scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian and bicycle access into and around the center should also be provided. Nt - * General Commercial (Probable FAR of 0.25 and Maximum FAR of 0.35) The General Commercial designation applies to properties along major activity corridors. This designation provides for _ a wide range of community-oriented and regional-oriented _ = commercial businesses, including businesses that cater to _ tourists traveling on Historic Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard). Rather than perpetuate the linear "strip" configuration Neighborhood Commercial along arterial highways and parking-lot-dominated commercial centers that represent development approaches of the past, the General Commercial designation emphasizes cluster approaches and buildings pulled close to the roadway, with reciprocal access provided between commercial developments. Community Commercial (Probable FAR of 0.25 and Maximum FAR of 0.35) The Community Commercial designation allows for a development of larger retail, entertainment, and commercial service business centers, generally as part of a cohesive and coordinated shopping destination of retail and service-oriented businesses that serve the entire community. Community areas typically include larger retail Community Commercial uses, theaters, restaurants, professional and medical offices, and community facilities. Community Commercial centers encompass sites from 10 to 50 acres in size, with buildings or collections of buildings containing 100,000 square feet or more of floor area. Design of Community Commercial centers includes well-designed pedestrian connectivity between uses and parking areas. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-14 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Mixed Use Designation The Mixed Use designation recognizes that portions of Rancho Cucamonga are evolving into more urban places, and that the community desires the creation of new, more sustainable development forms. Mixed Use development approaches offer opportunities for people to live close to work or near transit stops, to walk to neighborhood stores and parks, to enjoy indoor and outdoor entertainment close to home, and to experience exciting pedestrian districts. Mixed Use (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The Mixed Use designation offers opportunities for more intensely developed districts that combine complementary commercial, office, residential, and community uses in areas with easy access to transit. Mixed Use development may occur in two ways: 1) as a combination of uses within a single building (for example, retail on the first floor and residential or office on the upper floors); or 2) as a combination of uses on multiple parcels within a specified district of the City. In either case, the intent is to achieve a complete integration of the uses and their support functions into a livable development that fosters a strong sense of place. The desired outcome of the Mixed Use designation is to create F special urban places within the general suburban pattern of single- purpose uses. Victoria Gardens and the Town Center at Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard are exemplary developments that incorporate highly successful Mixed Use concepts. Community expectations of Mixed Use developments involve excellence in site planning, design, public safety, and use _—_ configurations based on the following criteria: w Mixed Use ■ Development projects will be interconnected rather than being rigidly separated. ■ New commercial and Mixed Use development will emphasize pedestrian orientation in site and building design and promote a walkable environment with active street frontages, well-scaled buildings, and usable public spaces such as small plazas, courtyards, and sidewalk cafes that are highly accessible and convenient to residents and visitors. ■ Parking lots and enclosed parking facilities will generally be located to the rear of buildings or at other locations where they are not visible from major streets. ■ Safe and convenient pedestrian movement will be provided into and within the site. • The mix of uses will promote walkability by offering goods and services that appeal to and meet the needs of adjacent and nearby residents. ■ Development forms will consist of generally higher intensities of use than in surrounding areas. ■ Projects will express a common design theme that may be carried out by architectural styles, landscaping and lighting treatment, street improvements and street furniture, and other means of unifying the development. This does not preclude an eclectic mix of architectural styles, but development will be tied together in physical form by some means. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-15 ■ Development approaches will involve a variety of scales and spaces to provide interest and diversity. ■ An integrated circulation system of arterial access, internal circulation, parking facilities, pedestrian pathways, bicycle routes, transit stops (where applicable), and related signage will be provided. Movement among uses within a district will be possible without forcing patrons to use adjacent arterial highways. ■ Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles will be integrated into development approaches to provide both the reality and perception of public safety. ■ Adequate emergency vehicle access will be provided to address public safety needs. ■ All development will provide a unique and engaging experience for residents and visitors to the City, similar to those often found in older, walkable towns and cities. Victoria Gardens integrates 9:' fF y•� a retail shopping a .' experience with public spaces, including courtyards,squares, open i A greens, playgrounds, and plazas. �,- � J Each application of the Mixed Use designation on the Land Use Plan has a specific intent, and the designation includes guidance tailored to the individual area. Flexibility is provided in the ranges to permit combinations of uses at a variety of intensities. Tables LU-2 through Table LU-14 identify the standards for each Mixed Use area. Unless otherwise specified, the most intensive combination is the most desirable. The successful application of Mixed Use provisions inherently favors large area master planning allowing for greater development flexibility. Such master planning generally requires consolidated ownership or partnership agreements within the Planning Area. Mixed Use planning over fragmented ownership patterns and smaller project area size is problematic. Consolidation for development of Mixed Use projects is strongly encouraged. Alternatively, development proposals that contain fragmented ownership patterns within a Mixed Use area should be required to master plan adjoining areas outside of the proponent's site. The Mixed Use areas include (numbers correspond with Figure LU-3): Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN 1. Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub- Area 18) 2. Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 3. Terra Vista 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Site Avenue and Center Avenue 11. Western Gateway(Bear Gulch 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Area) Avenue and Hellman Avenue 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue Channel Site and Hampshire Street 13. Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue City Corridor-Moderate (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The City Corridor - Moderate designation provides for a mix of uses at moderate development intensities along Foothill Boulevard. Allowed uses include medium- and medium-high density residential and a broad range of commercial uses including general retail, personal services, banks, restaurants, cafes, and office. Uses may be in freestanding or mixed-use buildings and projects. Civic uses, such as fire stations, schools, and churches, may be allowed and should be designed to be compatible with the scale and character of the corridor environment. City Corridor- High (Probable FAR of 0.6 and Maximum FAR of 1.5) The City Corridor - High designation provides for high development intensities along Foothill Boulevard, particularly adjacent to city centers. Allowed uses include medium-high and high density residential and a broad range of commercial uses including general retail, personal services, banks, restaurants, cafes, and offices. Office uses are strongly encouraged along Haven Avenue. Uses may be in freestanding or mixed-use buildings and projects. Civic uses, such as fire stations, schools, and churches may be allowed and should be designed to be compatible with the scale and character of the corridor environment. City Center(Probable FAR of 1.0 and Maximum FAR of 2.0) The City Center designation provides for intense concentrations of retail and civic activity, multifamily housing, and employment in a pedestrian-oriented, transit-ready environment. Allowed uses include medium-high to high density residential and a wide range of commercial uses, including general retail, personal services, banks, restaurants, cafes, and office. Uses may be in freestanding or mixed-use buildings and projects. Infill and redevelopment with a mix of uses is encouraged. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-17 Industrial Designations Industrial areas in Rancho Cucamonga benefit from their strategic location near the I- 15 and 1-10 freeways, the Metrolink station, and railway lines. A variety of light industrial, business park, office, manufacturing, heavy industrial, and similar business and industrial uses have been established, providing diverse employment opportunities for residents throughout the Inland Empire. Three Industrial designations are established that continue to provide many industrial development opportunities. Industrial Park (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) .., The Industrial Park designation accommodates master-planned concentrations of light industrial, research and development businesses, green technology, and general and medical office uses. The designation also allows for limited convenience goods and services for employees and visitors. Industrial Park uses are typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is higher than uses involving mostly manufacturing or warehousing. The Industrial Park designation applies to major traffic corridors in the City, including 4t" Street, Haven Avenue, Arrow Highway, and Foothill Boulevard, near the largest concentrations of civic and commercial activity. Industrial Park General Industrial (Probable FAR of 0.50 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) The General Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesale supply, heavy commercial, green technology, and office uses. Where adjacent to residential uses, properties designated General Industrial should be designed for office uses, or site planning should incorporate buffering techniques to minimize noise and traffic impacts associated with the industrial activity. Heavy Industrial (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.50) The Heavy Industrial designation permits heavy manufacturing, compounding, processing or fabrication, warehousing, storage, freight handling, and truck services and terminals, as well as supportive service commercial uses. Heavy Industrial areas are located to take advantage of rail lines and arterial roadway access, and to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses. Open Space Designations The Open Space designations identify areas devoted to the preservation of natural resources and outdoor recreation. The General Plan establishes four Open Space designations. Hillside Residential (0.10 to 2.0 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Hillside Residential designation is established to: 1) maintain the natural open space character of sensitive areas in the Sphere of Influence; 2) protect natural land forms from extensive grading and minimize erosion; 3) provide for public safety against wildland fire, fault, and flooding hazards; 4) protect water, plant, and animal resources; and 5) provide design standards that allow for limited residential development that respects and responds to the sensitive environmental conditions in the hillsides. The maximum dwelling unit density may not exceed two units per net buildable acre in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. Buildable acre is considered to be a contiguous area of the lot, which is less than 30 percent in natural slope, or the area determined through the environmental studies and Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-18 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN investigation as buildable and is subject to slope/capacity factor calculations contained in Section 17.24.080 of the Development Code. Maximum population density is 1.6 persons per acre. Open Space (0 to 0.10 Dwelling Units per Acre) The Open Space designation, which applies to both public and privately owned lands, is designed to: 1) establish protection in areas of fire, geologic, seismic, or flood hazards through restriction of intensive uses; 2) . promote the retention of open space for recreational use ' and the protection of natural resources; and 3) promote the preservation of open spaces that protect natural features, offer views to residents, and maintain open areas where flood, fire, geologic, and seismic conditions may endanger public health and safety. Recreational uses, including golf courses, are permitted where terrain and access are appropriate to accommodate such uses. On private lands designated Open Space, one residential Open Space unit is permitted per 10 acres, with at least one unit permitted on lots less than 10 acres in size. Maximum population density is 0.3 persons per acre. Conservation (FAR Not Applicable) The General Plan recognizes the sensitivity of the Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (AFSS) habitat and = the benefits it provides for wildlife conservation. The ` purpose of the Conservation designation is to identify sensitive areas like AFSS habitat that will be managed to preserve and protect sensitive habitat, wetland resources, and sensitive plant and animal species potentially occurring in designated areas. In cooperation with the County of San Bernardino, the City has designated vital AFSS areas within the Sphere of Flood Control/Utility Corridor Influence as Conservation, and distinct and defined conservation areas have been set aside as mitigation sites for various State, County, City, and private projects. Additional parcels may be purchased in the future as mitigation for other projects in the region. As development of habitable structures is not permitted within the Conservation designation, no FAR standard applies. Flood Control/Utility Corridor The Flood Control/Utility Corridor designation includes lands primarily used for flood control purposes and to support public utilities. Improvements typically include flood control channels, drainage basins, and major utility corridors, such as high-tension electric power transmission lines and towers. Flood control facilities include improved channels and natural waterways under the control of the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Both Deer and Day Creeks, along with utility easements within the Sphere of Influence, are key elements of the Flood Control/Utility Corridor designation. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-19 As development of habitable structures is not permitted within the Flood Control/Utility Corridor designation, no FAR standard applies until they are deemed surplus, rezoned, and subdivided. The majority of this designation falls in the City's Sphere of Influence where the area is subject to flooding, potential wildland fires, and geologic and seismic hazards. To provide a high level of public safety, these areas _ should be left natural for the most part, offering residents the additional benefits of a scenic and recreational resource with limited development potential. Public Facility Designations Civic/Regional The Public Facility designations refer to uses operated for public benefit. The General Plan establishes the following three Public Facility designations. Civic/Regional (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 1.0) The Civic/Regional designation applies to diverse public and quasi-public uses, including the Civic Center and police station, the County Courthouse facilities, the county jail/detention center, City fire stations, City libraries, post offices, and the City public works yard. ■ Schools (Probable FAR of 0.10 and Maximum FAR of 0.20) The Schools designation identifies both existing and planned schools within the City and Sphere of Influence. Elementary, junior high, high Schools school, and college locations are indicated by type on the Land Use Policy Map. School sites indicated as "planned" may change as growth w� AFC projections and student forecasts dictate. Parks The Parks designation identifies both existing and planned public parks within the City and Sphere of Influence. Existing parks include developed parkland owned by the City. Parklands include traditional neighborhood- level and community-level parks, as well as multi-purpose recreation- oriented lands such as the Epicenter and Central Park. Planned park sites are identified generally in areas where future residential development will NOW occur. The location of future parks will be further defined by detailed Parks neighborhood site planning and the City's desire to locate new parks adjacent to and integrated with school sites. The City also controls 130 acres of undeveloped parkland not including undeveloped trail acreage. Land Use Overlays To add additional flexibility for land development while maintaining other community goals and priorities, the City has created overlay zones for very specific areas. These include the Haven Avenue Office District, the Equestrian/Rural Area, and the Master Plan Overlay. The benefit of overlay zones is the ability to customize development agreements to achieve higher standards and appropriate densities that support the overall goals of the district. In addition to these, the Development Code also includes a Senior Housing Overlay District and the Hillside Overlay District. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Haven Avenue Office Overlay The Haven Avenue Office Overlay District provides an area for intensive, high-quality office development at this highly visible community gateway. progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development is required for the area, which is envisioned as the City's premier office corridor. Haven Avenue has a unique combination of access to 1-10 and LA/Ontario International Airport, making it an ideal location for high-end office development. Equestrian/Rural Overlay The Equestrian/Rural Overlay District allows for the keeping of horses and other farm animals, subject to regulations specified in the Development Code. All new developments within this overlay zone are required to provide community and local trails for equestrian use in accordance with the Hiking and Riding Trails Plan (see Chapter 5, Community Services). Properties designated as Very Low Residential are also subject to the Equestrian/Rural Overlay regulations. Master Plan Overlay The Master Plan Overlay District provides a tool to look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve area- or district-wide circulation, drainage, and neighborhood compatibility issues. The Master Plan Overlay creates an opportunity for the City to address the special or unique needs or characteristics of certain areas so designated by the General Plan, to ensure a harmonious relationship between existing and proposed uses, and to coordinate and promote the community improvement efforts of both private and public resources. The requirement for implementation of a project using the Master Plan Overlay is to prepare a conceptual master plan as a precursor to entitlement approval. Figure LU-2 identifies the locations of the Master Plan Overlays. Planning Direction for Mixed Use Areas Mixed Use designations assume a significant role in this General Plan. The majority of these designations are arrayed along Foothill Boulevard. Their location is of critical importance because of the pivotal nature of Foothill Boulevard as the City's core commercial spine. Each Mixed Use designation applies different development parameters, including the use mix, to each individual area as described in the following sections. The land use percentages shown in each of the tables are to be used as guidelines only; the application of site planning principles and performance criteria is central to achieving high-quality development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-21 Mixed Use: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors The Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Mixed Use area (#1 on Figure LU-3) is bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, 1-15, and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel. This Mixed Use area is intended to: ■ Achieve a powerful commercial magnet within the region ■ Create a unique urban village • Establish a City and regional landmark of visual excellence ■ Include a performing arts/cultural center of regional significance A majority of the regional commercial component has already been completed, including a performing arts/cultural center - the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. A portion of the site will include additional residential, retail, and office development. Public/Quasi Public uses, in addition to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, include public parks, privately owned spaces open to the public during normal hours of operation, pedestrian paths and sidewalks, bikeways, landscape and hardscape areas within and connecting to public spaces, schools to serve residential uses, and other public facilities necessary to achieve a well-supported development and ensure a high level of amenities. Victoria Gardens creates a ', very pedestrian-friendly € environment. y. 14 F Residential uses are intended to be an integral part of the development rather than developed as separate enclaves isolated from other activities and uses. Buffering, building design and orientation, lighting control, noise control, and other considerations to ensure a high standard of quality for residential development are required. The intent is to create a truly contemporary urban complex based on the best urban design practices. A variety of densities and housing types, from multi-unit condominiums and apartments to detached single unit residential, is envisioned. Housing types that cater to the lifestyles of couples and professionals without children are one example of the emerging market niche that is particularly suited to this area. Building types and standards need not conform to residential designations applied elsewhere in the City, but a mix of housing types is required. Table LU-2 specifies the uses and the range of development for each type of land use. The land use categories are broad to allow for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market. Figure LU-3 identifies the locations of the Mixed Use designations. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-22 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Residential uses are within walking distance of the retail,entertainment, public spaces,and cultural facilities at Victoria Gardens. i, j. Table LU-2: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Land Use Mix Percent Acreage Range Estimated"Most Land Us Range Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Unit Range Units(du) Commercial—retail,service commercial, office,tourist 20%-41% 99-209 acres 222 acres commercial Public/Quasi Public— performing arts center,trails, 5%- 12% 26-61 acres 40 acres landscape/hardscape, public spaces 77-153 acres @ 98 acres @ Residential 15%-30% 14 du/acre2 14 du/acre2 788 to 1,852 du 1,082 du Residential/Mixed Use 3-21 acres 3 acres @ Main Street Area 0%-4% 14-100 du/acre 100 du/acre 290 du 290 du 32 acres 32 acres @ Residential Low Medium 6% 4-8 du/acre 8 du/acre 128 to 256 du 208 dui Total Residential' 21%-36% 112-206 acres 133 acres 1,206 to 2,398 du 1,580 du Rights-of-way— 20%-25% 102-128 acres 115 acres collector/local roads Totals 100% 510 acres 510 acres Notes: 1. The acreage in this category also includes land for local park and school purposes. 2. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac as long as the total of 1,082 dwelling units is not exceeded. 3. Indicates target dwelling units based on historic City experience where development occurs midway between 50-75%of the range. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-23 Figure LU-3: Mixed Use Areas Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-25 Mixed Use: Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) The Town Center Mixed Use Area (#2 on Figure LU-3) functions as a vibrant community activity center at the southwestern corner of the Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard intersection. The other three corners are comprised of a mix of public service, commercial, office, and historic uses. The intent of the Mixed Use designation at this location is to: ■ Complete and strengthen the town center complex with complementary, community-oriented uses. ■ Introduce a distinct, intensified, Mixed Use development project that maximizes the potential of this key site and relates to surrounding uses in the node. ■ Reinforce the Haven Avenue office corridor and anchor it at the north end. ■ Contribute to a unique architectural presence by providing a design contrast to the City Hall/County Courthouse facilities, Town Center commercial complex, and the historic Virginia Dare winery building. The primary, but not exclusive use is shown in Table LU-3, with the Town Center node at Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Office uses, when completed, will be located along Haven Avenue and will provide convenient pedestrian access to nearby commercial and civic uses. Commercial uses include specialty restaurants, cafes, small retail stores, and other service commercial uses catering to the large employee population along Haven Avenue and the nearby industrial area. The design and fagade treatment of commercial uses complement and provide visual interest. Common outdoor spaces provide comfort and shelter within an attractive landscaped/hardscaped setting, and connect to the Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue intersection. Public/Quasi Public uses complement the City Hall and the County Courthouse facilities. Government offices, community meeting facilities, and a public plaza or sculpture garden represent some of the possibilities. Public spaces provide connections, both physically and visually, to other uses within the Town Center node. This area offers a special opportunity to reflect a strong visual recognition of the vineyard historical heritage in this central portion of the City; this topic is also discussed in the Community Design section of this Chapter. Town Center at Foothill �' p Boulevard and Haven Avenue. $II u * a NOW— Managing . Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Residential uses are an integral part of the development, oriented to the Town Center node. The location is well suited for workers seeking condominiums and higher-end apartments close to jobs and community services. Pedestrian connections between residential and non-residential uses are lined with open space paseos and well- lighted paths. Table LU-3 specifies the uses and the range of development for each land use category. The commercial and residential components have been completed. Table LU-3: Mixed Use: Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Percent Average Density Case" Range (du/acre) Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Unit Range Units(du) Commercial—retail,service commercial, support office, 10%-15% 3-5 acres 5 acres tourist commercial Office—professional 30%-50% 10-15 acres 15 acres Public/Quasi Public— community theater, 0%-10% 0-3 acres 1 acre institutional 8-10 acres@ 9 acres @ Residential 25%-35% 14 du/acre' 14 du/acre' 112to140du 126du Rights-of-way— 5% 1 acres 1 acre collector/local roads Totals 100% 31 acres 31 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 14 du/ac as long as the total of 140 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Terra Vista The Terra Vista Mixed Use Area (#3 on Figure LU-3) is located along the north side of Foothill Boulevard and is bisected by Milliken Avenue. This area is part of the Terra Vista Community Plan, approved in 1981, and one of the key remaining areas left to be developed within the Terra Vista Community. The intent is to: ■ Establish a large office complex with an emphasis on medical corporate offices and financial services. ■ Complement the concentration of health care and medical facilities in the area. ■ Incorporate a high-density residential component near commercial and public services. Table LU-4 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-27 Table LU-4: Mixed Use: Terra Vista Acreage Range Estimated "Most Case" Land Use Percent Average Density Acres/Dwelling Units Range (du/acre) (du) Dwelling Unit Range Office—professional, 85%-87% 45-47 acres 47 acres medical corporate offices 6.5-8.1 acres 6.5 acres @ Residential 12%-15% 6.5 @ 24-30 du/acre or 30 du/acre' 8.1 @ 14-24 du/ac 195 du 113-195 Totals 100% 53.5 acres 53.5 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range.Actual density may increase up to 30 du/ac as long as the total of 195 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue This site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue (#4 on Figure LU-3). A Master Plan was approved and implemented for the site, which includes a 10.5-acre, 166-unit workforce multi-unit housing project, an existing restaurant at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue, and commercial, office, and restaurant land use at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Table LU-5 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Table LU-5: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue Estimated"Most Land Use Percent Acreage Case" Range Range Acres/Dwelling Units(du) Residential Medium/Residential 10.5 acres @ Medium High 0%-62% 0-10.5 acres 20 du/acre (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre)' 210 du Commercial—Retail and restaurant 0%-100% 0-17 acres 17 acres Note: 1. This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include multi-unit housing of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-28 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Medium High Residential Development along Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa and Center Avenues. r Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue This area (#5 on Figure LU-3) is comprised of a stretch of small properties along the north side of Foothill Boulevard that are candidates for revitalization. Since Foothill Boulevard is also Historic Route 66, it has seen much change over the years. Many of the shopping centers reflect a different style and set of standards than more contemporary developments. Therefore, their vitality has been limited and, over the course of time, will diminish. Revitalization can occur either on an individual parcel basis or more comprehensively through land assembly. A large portion of this area has already been developed for residential use (Main Street at Route 66). The remaining corners at Hellman and Archibald Avenues have not been redeveloped. This Mixed Use designation will facilitate the re-use of challenging parcel sizes and dimensions through flexibility in site planning and use configuration. The intent is to achieve: ■ A revitalized "mini-district"that has unique appeal to residents and visitors ■ An intimate, walkable character with an interesting mix of businesses integrated with residential ■ A distinct appearance and ambiance that sets the area apart from other portions of Foothill Boulevard ■ A small but distinct complex of multi-unit housing that gives the neighborhood a permanent residential anchor Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-29 "Main Street at Route 66" residential developmentJV ' tr _ along Foothill Boulevard, near Hellman Avenue. A _ e _ F i- , Retail uses may be combined with office uses to achieve multi-story buildings. The clustering of buildings is desirable, along with shared parking facilities. The overall design should provide a pedestrian ambiance that is distinct from the surrounding auto-oriented commercial development. Residential development is an integral part of this Mixed Use area. A range of housing types is envisioned, including condominiums, apartments, and lofts. The inclusion of home enterprise (live/work) uses may involve more activity than typical home occupations but will still present a fundamentally residential character. The creative integration of residential development will add variety and ongoing activity along this segment of Foothill Boulevard. In an effort to encourage the assembly of parcels, particularly at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, a higher density (30 du/ac) will be allowed only if lot consolidation can yield a minimum lot size of 75,000 square feet. A Master Plan Overlay will be required for the remaining developable sites. Table LU-6 specifies the uses and the range of development for each classification. Table LU-6: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue Percent Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Range Average Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Unit Range Units (d& j Commercial 30%-33% 11.3-12.5 acres 12.5 acres 11.3 acres @ 11.3 acres @ Residential Medium 30%-30% 15 du/acre' 15 du/acre' 170 du 170 du 13.7-15 acres @ 13.7 acres @ Residential High' 37%-40% 30 du/acre' 30 du/acre2 329 to 450 du 411 du Totals 100% 37.5 acres 37.5 acres Notes: 1. The Residential High (30 du/ac) designation is only allowed when properties are consolidated to create a minimum project lot size of 75,000 square feet. 2. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 30 du/ac, as long as the total of 450 dwelling units is not exceeded. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-6: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue Percent Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Range Average Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling IL Dwelling Unit Range Units (du) Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street This site is located on Foothill Boulevard between Helms Avenue, Hampshire Street, and Malachite Avenue (#6 on Figure LU-3). The long-established commercial shopping center presents an opportunity to revitalize this site with neighborhood commercial-serving uses and residential development. The self-storage facility located at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street will buffer the low-density residential development to the south. Table LU-7 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Table LU-7: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Percent Average Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling Range Dwelling Unit Range Units (du) Commercial 60%-70% 3.8-4.4 acres 4.4 acres 1.9-2.5 acres @ 1.9 acres @ Residential 30%-40% 30 du/acre' 30 du/acre' 45 to 76 du 57 du Totals 100% 6.3 acres 6.3 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range.Actual density may increase up to 30 du/ac as long as the total of 76 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue This site is located on Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue (#7 on Figure LU-3). The relatively large vacant site should provide a combination of restaurants, entertainment, retail, hospitality, office, and residential opportunities within an urban village setting. Commercial uses should be located along Foothill Boulevard, with retail buildings fronting the boulevard to create a more pedestrian-friendly street frontage. Large-scale retail business and "big box" buildings are allowed so long as they accommodate automobile, pedestrian, and transit modes of transportation. Smaller retail and restaurant buildings are encouraged to be grouped continuously along the street, while individual building pads separated by large parking areas are discouraged. Table LU-8 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. A pedestrian-friendly, gridded street network is recommended for the interior to connect the commercial and residential areas, while surface parking areas are Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-31 encouraged to be located behind buildings. Pedestrian connections to Foothill Boulevard and transit stops will also be important. Table LU-8: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue Percent Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Range Average Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Unit Range Units(du) Commercial 40%-60% 19.1-28.7 acres 28.7 acres Office—professional 6%-10% 2.9-4.8 acres 4.8 acres Public/Quasi-Public— 4% 1.9 acres 1.9 acres parks/public plazas 12.4-23.9 acres @ 12.4 acres @ Residential 26%-50% 24-30 du/acre' 30 du/acre' 298 to 717 du 372 du Totals 100% 47.8 acres 47.8 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 30 du/ac as long as the total of 717 dwelling units is not exceeded. The residential component will provide connections in the form of small interior streets and pedestrian paseos to the commercial and office components of the development. Residential development should also include an active street front instead of blank walls along Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive, and interior streets to connect the various parts of the development. Isolated and gated residential development that is walled off from adjoining uses would be prohibited. Nearly two acres of public space in the form of public plazas and fountains will provide people with gathering areas in the commercial component of the development. Additional recreational amenities are also encouraged for the residential component of the development. Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub-Area 18) This area is bounded on the south by 4t" Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the railroad, and on the west by Utica Street (#8 on Figure LU-3). The development is entirely built out. It surrounds an 18-hole golf course and includes the Metrolink Station off Milliken Avenue. The Industrial Area Specific Plan (Empire Lakes) Mixed Use area reflects the mixed land use approved under the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. The intent of the Mixed Use designation is to: ■ Promote planning flexibility to achieve more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs ■ Integrate a wider range of retail commercial, service commercial, recreation, and office uses within this industrial area of the City ■ Allow for the sensitive inclusion of high-density residential development that offers high-quality multi-unit condominiums and apartments for employees desiring housing close to work and transit Table LU-9 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-9: Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan/Subarea 18 Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Percent Average Density Case" Range (du/acre) Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Units Units(du) Commercial—retail, service commercial, tourist commercial, 15%-25% 34-57 acres 40 acres office(commercial and professional) Office—professional, medical 40%-60% 90-136 acres 110.5 acres corporate offices Public/Quasi-Public/Recreation 7.5% 16.5 ac 16.5 acres 25-50 acres @ 50 acres @ Residential 11%-22% 27.75 du/acre' 27.75 du/acre' 694 to 1,388 du 1,388 du ROW—Metrolink Parking 4.5% 10.3 ac 10.3 acres Totals 100% 227 acres 227 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 27.75 du/ac as long as the total of 1,388 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel This site, located at Foothill Boulevard along Deer Creek Channel (#9 on Figure LU- 3), provides an excellent opportunity to integrate commercial and residential uses into a cohesive development. Commercial development will be sited along the Foothill Boulevard frontage, while residential development will be located toward the southern area of the property. Development should provide pedestrian access between uses and direct pedestrian connections to Foothill Boulevard and transit stops. High-density development should step down to detached residential development along the western boundary providing a transition to the adjacent low- density residential development. Public street connections to Hampshire Street and Devon Street in the adjacent residential neighborhood will be discouraged, except for emergency vehicles. Table LU-10 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Table LU-10: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel Percent Acreage Range Estimated "Most Case" Land Use Average Density(du/acre) Range Dwelling Unit Ran a Acres/Dwelling Units(du) 9 9 Commercial 25%-30% 4.4-5.3 acres 5.3 acres 12.4-13.3 acres @ 12.4 acres @ Residential 70%-75% 10-14 du/acre' 14 du/acre' 124 to 186 du 174 du Totals 100% 17.7 acres 17.7 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 14 du/ac as long as the total of 186 dwelling units is not exceeded. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-33 Mixed Use: Haven Avenue and Church Street This 14.77-acre site, located on the south side of Church Street between Center and Haven Avenues, was once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin (#10 on Figure LU-3). Deemed surplus due to drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, it became available for private development. Site development, as approved through a master plan, is nearly completed, with Low Residential units lined along Center Avenue and Medium Residential units located within the interior of the site. Table LU-11 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Table LU-11: Mixed Use: Haven Avenue and Church Street Site se Im IL Acreage Range Office—professional 0%-100% 0-10.95 acres Residential Medium 0%-100% 0-3.36 acres (8-14 dwelling units per acre)' Note: 1. This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Residential Medium (8-14 dwelling units per acre). Mixed Use: Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) This area (#11 on Figure LU-3) serves as the entrance to the City from the west, and is part of an important historical heritage that has not been able to compete successfully in the market place. The intent is to achieve: ■ A dynamic entrance to Rancho Cucamonga that reflects and sustains the historic character represented by a few existing structures in the area ■ A "target district" that attracts specialty businesses and is attractive to both local residents and visitors to the community ■ A significant example of the Historic Route 66 theme to exemplify the important role of the Rancho Cucamonga area during that historic era ■ A sustainable economic vitality The primary, but not exclusive, proposed uses are retail and service commercial serving the Red Hill and Bear Gulch neighborhoods, as well as selective markets on a more regional scale. This area has served as a "dinnerhouse" district, which is a desirable continued role as exemplified by the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp Restaurants. However, there is not enough vitality in the area to sustain that specialty. By allowing a mix of commercial, tourist commercial, office, and residential development with somewhat greater intensities than currently prevail, the possibility exists to generate investment interest in this area. Tourist-serving commercial uses are an important component of this concept, but it must be recognized that the location limits access to as large a market as could be achieved at a freeway location. Office development is proposed as a means of achieving some level of daytime and early evening population in the area. Residential development should be multi-unit condominium and apartment types to energize the district during day and evening business hours. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-34 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Policies and implementation actions encourage the assembly of parcels within this area. Incentive programs that include opportunity for intensity/density bonuses or the offering of City assistance in the preparation of master plans for all or some portion of the Mixed Use area will be further defined when a project is received. Table LU-12 specifies the uses and the range of development for each land use category. The use categories are broad to allow for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market. Table LU-12: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Gateway Bear Gulch Area) Acreage Range Estimated "Most Land Use Percent Range Average Density Case" (du/acre) Acres/Dwelling MC� Dwelling Unit Range Units(du) Commercial—retail, service commercial,tourist commercial,office 50%-70% 27.5-38.5 acres 38.5 acres (commercial and professional) 16.5-27.5 acres @ 16.5 acres @ Residential 30%-50% 14 du/acre' 14 du/acre' 231 to 385 du 231 du Totals 100% 55.0 acres 55.0 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 14 du/ac as long as the total of 385 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7.24-acre site, located at the southern base of"Red Hill," is strategically near the northwest corner of Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue (#12 on Figure LU-3). Like other newly designated Mixed Use areas, this site presents an opportunity to expand commercial office activity while providing an opportunity for new multi-unit residential development in the City. Table LU-13 specifies the uses and range of development that are allowed. Table LU-13: Mined Use: Foothill Boulevard - Cucamonga Channel Site Land Use Mix Percent Range Acreage Range Residential Medium 0%- 100% 0-7.24 acres (8-14 Dwelling Units Per Acre)' Office 0%- 100% 0-7.24 acres Note: 1. This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Residential Medium High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District(SHOD). Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-35 Mixed Use: Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) This is a relatively small, but significant, site within the historic Alta Loma commercial area (#13 on Figure LU-3)that was once the location of a large citrus packing house. The site is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street, between the neighborhood elementary school and original downtown for the Alta Loma community. This site, already developed, brings new activity into the historic town center with multi-unit residential development. Table LU-14 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Mixed Use: Historic Alta Loma(Amethyst Site) Table LU-14: Mixed Use: Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) Land Use Mix Percent Range Residential Medium High 0%- 100% 0-3.24 acres (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Office—Professional 0%- 100% 0-3.24 acres Implications of Land Use Policy Over time, the distribution of uses within the community will change as vacant properties develop and application of land use policy will facilitate evolution toward the mix of uses the City envisions. Table LU-15 summarizes the level of development expected through the 2030 planning horizon year. The anticipated change from year 2009 baseline conditions are shown as well. As planned infrastructure improvements, long-term public facility and service needs, and resource use set forth in the other General Plan Chapters have been based on these growth projections, the City will continue to track development to monitor projected versus actual conditions, and to adjust policies and implementation programs accordingly. Tables LU-16 through LU-18 summarizes the build-out capacity in detail for each land use designation. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-15: Build-Out Summary Baseline: 20091 General Plan Build Out: 2030 Change Percent City S0I2 Total City S0I2 Total (total only) Change Dwelling Units 55,608 91 55,699 62,196 1,057 63,253 7,554 13.6% Population 179,200 300 179,500 200,400 3,400 203,800 24,300 13.5% Non- Residential 80,030,000 0 80,030,000 99,797,000 0 99,797,000 19,767,000 24.7% Square Feet Employment 77,350 0 77,350 103,040 0 103,040 25,690 33.2% Notes: 1. 2009 Baseline data is based on Existing Land Use Geographical Information Systems land use data. 2. SOI:Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-37 Table LU-16: Land Use Plan Summary-Residential Designations City Area Sphere of Influence Totals Land Use Designations Density g Factor' Target Target Total Dwelling Dwelling Total Total Target Acres 2 Dwelling Acres 2 Dwelling Dwelling Units Units s Units Acreage Units s Units Dwelling Units Residential Designations Hillside(0.1-2.0 du/ac) 1.29 133 13 to 268 151 695 70-1,400 831 828 83-1,668 982 Very Low(0.10-2.0 du/ac) 1.29 4,007 401 to 8,029 7,394 - - - 4,007 401-8,029 7,394 Low(2.0-4.0 du/ac) 3.25 4,371 9,194 to 18,080 18,050 - 4,371 9,194-18,080 18,050 Low Medium 6.50 1,852 7,739 to 15,100 13,320 - 7,739-15,100 13,320 (4.0-8.0 du/ac) 1,852 Medium(8.0-14.0 du/ac) 11.75 790 6,270 to 10,837 9,283 - 790 6,270-10,837 9,283 Medium High 20.25 367 5,237 to 8,915 7,432 - 5,237-8,915 7,432 (14.0-24.0 du/ac) 367 High(24.0-30.0 du/ac) 27.75 44 1,376 to 1,713 1,221 - 44 1,376-1,713 1,221 Mixed Use Varies 276 3,701 to 6,511 5,345 - 276 3,701-6,511 5,345 Open 0 OSpace 0.10 483 0 to 48 5 2,496 0-250 226 2,979 0-298 226 ( ) `RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 12,323 33,931 to � �� Notes: 1. The Density Factor is based upon actual development that has occurred in the City and represents a level midway between 50%and 75%of the range. It is used to calculate the target number of dwelling units. This factor is only applied to vacant developable lands. A different Density Factor was applied to existing development to obtain an accurate baseline number. 2. The range of dwelling units is derived by multiplying the lower and upper threshold of density/intensity range by the number of acres, and rounded to the nearest whole number. This range represents the theoretical potential.Some development will produce densities at or near the top of the range;however, most will not. 3. Target dwelling units is the probable level of development based on historical development patterns, except for Mixed Use Residential, which is based primarily on a target density. 4. Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses. 5. Open Space is generally a non-residential category that permits a very limited number of residential units on privately owned properties. Within the City, Open Space applies to the golf courses and the Pacific Electric Trail. In the northwest quadrant of the City, a few properties are designated Open Space and could yield residential units. However, any such development would be limited to a density of 0.1 units per acre(or one unit per parcel on lots less than 10 acres in size)and would be subject to the slope, drainage,flood zones, and fault zone analysis at a minimum under the Hillside Overlay Ordinance,further limiting any residential Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-38 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-16: Land Use Plan Summary-Residential Designations ICity Area Sphere of Influence Totals Land Use Designations Density g Factor' Target Target Total Dwelling Dwelling Total Total Target Acres 2 Dwelling Acres 2 Dwelling Dwelling Units Units 3 Units Units 3 Acreage Units Dwelling Units development potential. Table LU-17: Land Use Plan Summary-Non-Residential Designations Acres Square Feet Probable Square Feet Employment3 Land Use Designations (in thousands) (in thousands) (City Only) Total Acres City Sol (City Only) � (City Only) Non-Residentia12 Office(0.40-1.0 FAR) 86 1,497 to 3,746 1,497 3,180 86 Neighborhood Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 164 1,785 to 2,500 1,785 3,030 164 Community Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 119 1,292 to 1,810 1,292 1,970 119 General Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 470 6,555 to 7,165 6,555 10,020 470 Subtotal - 11,129 to 15,221 11,129 - Mixed Use(0.25-1.0 FAR)^ 626 6,498 to 25,996 11,973 20,270 626 Subtotal 626 6,498 to 25,996 11,973 20,270 Industrial Park(0.40-0.60 FAR) 559 9,739 to 14,610 9,739 6,610 559 -Haven Overlay(0.40-1.0 FAR) 215 3,745 to 9,365 3,745 7,950 215 General Industrial(0.50-0.60 FAR) 1,974 42,993 to 51,592 42,993 29,220 1,974 Heavy Industrial(0.40-0.50 FAR) 891 15,523 to 19,405 15,523 15,820 891 Subtota'J-W - �000 to 94,� - Open Space(0.0-0.10 du/ac) 483 2,496 - - - 2,979 Conservation i 353 983 - - - 1,336 Flood Control/Utility Corridor 1,711 1,753 - - 3,464 Subtot _--_ ■ Civic/Regional(0.40-1.0 FAR) 130 2,265 to 5,662 2,265 1,050 130 Schools(0.10-0.20 FAR) 558 2,430 to 4,861 2,430 3,920 558 Parks 445 - - - 445 Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-39 Subtotal 1,133 o_ 4,695 to 10,523 4,6951 4,970 ` 1,133 -- °322 to 146a �3A- Notes: 1. The range of square footage is derived by multiplying the probable lower and upper threshold of intensity range by the number of acres,and rounded to the nearest hundred. 2. Non-residential FAR Range:lower number is the probable FAR on average,but in some cases it may be lower.Higher number is the maximum FAR allowed for any specific project. 3. Employment is calculated by using the Probable Square Feet and employment factors for each non-residential land use designations. 4. Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential use. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-18: Build Out Summary by Land Use Acres' Target Dwelling Units Probable Non-Residential Land Use Designations Percent (City Only) of Total Square Feet City SOI Total City SOI Total Employment (in thousands) Hillside Residential(0.1-2.0 du/ac) 133 695 828 3.1% 151 831 982 Very Low Residential(0.1-2.0 du/ac) 4,007 - 4,007 15.1% 7,394 - 7,394 Low Residential(2.0-4.0 du/ac) 4,371 4,371 16.5% 18,050 18,050 Low Medium Residential(4.0-8.0 du/ac) 1,852 1,852 7.0% 13,320 13,320 Medium Residential(8.0-14.0 du/ac) 790 790 3.0% 9,283 9,283 Medium High Residential(14.0-24.0 du/ac) 367 367 1.4% 7,432 7,432 High Residential(24.0-30.0 du/ac) 44 44 0.2% 1,221 1,221 - Mixed Use 902 902 3.4% 5,345 5,345 11,973 20,270 Office(0.40-1.0 FAR) 86 86 0.3% - - 1,497 3,180 Neighborhood Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 164 164 0.6% 1,785 3,030 Community Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 119 119 0.4% 1,292 1,970 General Commercial(0.25-0.35 FAR) 470 470 1.8% 6,555 10,020 Industrial Park(0.40-0.60 FAR) 559 559 2.1% 9,739 6,610 -Haven Ave Office Overlay(0.40-1.0 FAR) 215 215 0.8% 3,745 7,950 General Industrial(0.50-0.60 FAR) 1,974 1,974 7.4% 42,993 29,220 Heavy Industrial(0.40-0.50 FAR) 891 891 3.4% - 15,523 15,820 Open Space(0.0-0.1 du/ac) 483 2,496 2,979 11.2% 226 226 - - Conservation 353 983 1,336 5.0% - - Flood Control/Utility Corridor 1,711 1,753 3,464 13.0% - - Civic/Regional 0.40-1.0 FAR) 130 - 130 0.5% 2,265 1,050 Schools(0.10-0.20 FAR) 558 558 2.1% 2,430 3,920 Parks 445 445 1.7% - - - - - GRAND TOTAL ---6 100.0% 62,196 1,057 63,253 99,797 103,040 Notes: 1. Acres include existing development and undeveloped vacant properties. 2. Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-41 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-42 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Focus Areas The process of preparing the General Plan involved focusing on potential areas of change, both from a geographic standpoint and a strategic or policy standpoint. For each of these potential areas of change, or focus areas, existing conditions were evaluated, and alternative directions were developed and analyzed. These focus areas are Foothill Boulevard, South Haven Avenue, Southwest, Southeast, and the Hillsides (see Figure LU-4: Focus Areas). Foothill Boulevard The Foothill Boulevard Focus Area covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 as it runs through the City. While commercial uses predominate all along Foothill Boulevard, the western and eastern portions of the boulevard have distinct land use patterns. The western portion, which stretches from the western border of the City to roughly Haven Avenue, is fronted by comparatively small parcels, with housing developments directly behind them. In some instances, the residential uses extend all the way to Foothill Boulevard. The eastern portion, which runs from Haven Avenue to East Avenue, is fronted by much larger parcels that feature extensive retail centers surrounded by parking lots. The eastern portion also includes some of the large, vacant commercial lots remaining in Rancho Cucamonga, while the western portion is largely built out. The main issues for this focus area include: ■ Encouraging commercial and Mixed Use development appropriate for the land use patterns of the Boulevard ■ Concentrating commercial uses at major intersections to prepare Foothill Boulevard for the future integration of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service currently planned by Omnitrans ■ Improving the visual feel of Foothill Boulevard to better recognize that as the City's major east-west thoroughfare, it is the main public face of Rancho Cucamonga Mercury Insurance office building on Foothill Boulevard. vft- Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN The vision for this area includes: ■ Involving the concentration of community- and regional-serving uses east of Haven Avenue, while neighborhood-serving uses are focused on the western portion ■ Allow new Mixed Use, commercial, residential, and civic development opportunities along the length of the Boulevard ■ Design new development in such a way as to accommodate both transit and automobile access South Haven Avenue The South Haven Avenue Focus Area covers a portion of Rancho Cucamonga that the City envisions as its major office corridor. The Development Code supports this vision through the use of an overlay district that offers incentives for office development. Haven Avenue, which north of the focus area runs past City Hall, is one of Rancho Cucamonga's most significant north-south corridors. To the south, the focus area borders the City of Ontario, making the large vacant property just inside the City of Rancho Cucamonga a prime location for a large "gateway" development to mark the entrance to the City. Established uses in the focus area range from small-scale office and commercial to large-scale light industrial and warehousing. Large vacant parcels exist throughout the area, although many have proposed or approved plans. Three-story office building on South Haven Avenue. ri The vision for this area includes: ■ Creating a central business hub at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue ■ Encouraging development with an emphasis on the creation of pleasant, well-landscaped, office park settings, with restaurants and other amenities that are within walking distance for employees and visitors ■ Attracting multi-story Class A office buildings Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Figure LU-4: Focus Areas Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-45 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-46 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Southwest The Southwest Focus Area is bordered to the south by the City of Ontario and to the west by the City of Upland. The area is divided north from the south by a Metrolink rail line that runs adjacent to 8t" Street. Uses in the focus area are primarily light industrial and warehousing, but planned residential neighborhoods border the area to the southwest and the northeast. The residential neighborhood to the southwest is isolated from commercial and retail uses (e.g., grocery stores, restaurants, dry cleaners, etc.) in Rancho Cucamonga, and those residents are likely to do much of their daily shopping in Ontario. The focus area has several large vacant parcels remaining, although many have approved development plans. The focus area and the immediate surrounding area have several community centers, including the Mulberry Early Learning Center, Northtown Community Center, and the RC Family Resource Center. The historic neighborhood of Northtown, which developed around the railroad tracks in the 1930s, is also located here, as is the historic Biane Winery. The City of Rancho Cucamonga applied for and received in 2009 a $360,000 four- year grant from the prestigious Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to develop a program and community partnership for the purpose of reducing childhood obesity in Southwest Cucamonga. The focus of the grant will be to promote healthy eating and active living for families and children. The vision for this area includes: ■ Allowing for the development of commercial and community services needed by the adjacent residential neighborhoods ■ Implementing community design improvements and reducing truck traffic impacts on the residential neighborhoods ■ Encouraging the re-use and rehabilitation of historic or high-quality buildings to the greatest extent possible Southeast The Southeast Focus Area is bordered to the west by 1-15 and to the east by unincorporated San Bernardino County and the City of Fontana. Heavy industrial uses, primarily steel and pipe manufacturing predominate. Development located directly north of the focus area includes a shopping center, a Metropolitan Water District reservoir, and a multi-unit residential neighborhood. The focus area surrounds Reliant Energy's Etiwanda Power Plant on Etiwanda Avenue. This area supports the only remaining land in Rancho Cucamonga devoted to heavy industrial uses; these businesses are a valuable source of employment and revenue. The focus area also benefits from proximity to the freeway, although the circulation system requires improvements to meet the needs of the intensive truck traffic generated by the industrial uses. (This issue is addressed in the Community Mobility Chapter.) For the health of residents as well as for the long-term economic viability of this part of Rancho Cucamonga, wherever possible, the "greening" of businesses in the area is strongly encouraged. The development of green businesses represents a Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-47 tremendous opportunity for Rancho Cucamonga to maintain its leadership in the environmental arena. The vision for this focus area includes: ■ Concentrating heavy industrial uses ■ Supporting infrastructure improvements to attract industrial, manufacturing, and green technology uses ■ Preventing encroachment of conflicting uses that would diminish the utility of the area for heavy industry Hillsides The Hillside Focus Area is in unincorporated San Bernardino County, adjacent to Rancho Cucamonga's northern border; it lies within the City's Sphere of Influence. Most of the area consists of undeveloped hillsides, although large-lot residential subdivisions have been established in the areas designated Hillside Residential (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) and Open Space (0.0 to 0.10 du/ac). The area also has significant land set aside for resource conservation in Day and East Etiwanda Canyons, where no development is allowed. Hillside development in Rancho Cucamonga is regulated by the Hillside Development Ordinance, which applies to all projects on land with natural slopes of eight percent grade or greater, with some exceptions, as indicated in the Ordinance. The Hillside Overlay District, as depicted on the Development District Map in the Development Code, defines the boundaries. The Hillside Overlay District also applies to areas outside of this focus area. The Ordinance includes a comprehensive set of guidelines and standards that seek to allow for reasonable development of hillside areas while minimizing the adverse effects of grading, protecting environmentally sensitive areas, and providing for public health and safety. The Ordinance contains basic design guidelines and minimum development standards. The intent is to encourage innovative and alternative development solutions, as well as to establish minimum acceptable criteria. Clustering of units is encouraged where feasible, and positioning the units to "fit" the land and minimize grading is required. The most significant provisions of the Ordinance involve the use of: ■ Slope development standards, which require development integration with the slope and increasingly restrictive grading and structural design as the slope increases ■ A slope density formula, which limits the maximum possible density allowed based upon the slope gradient ■ Building envelopes, which limit the maximum allowable building height to 30 feet, as measured from the finished grade Table LU-19: Slope Development Guidelines establishes the design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. These guidelines are further defined in the Hillside Development Ordinance. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-48 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-19: Slope Development Guidelines Percent Natural Slope uidelines 5 or less This is not a hillside condition. Grading with conventional, fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable. 5 to 7.9 Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing landforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading. When in conjunction with the techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adjacent to these special design features as partial compliance with this standard. 8 to 14.9 This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architectural and design techniques that minimize grading are required in this zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level foundations of greater than 18 inches, stem walls, stacking and clustering. In conjunction with the alternative techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider padded building sites adjacent to those special features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that special design feature and the adjacent lots. 15 to 29.9 Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes, and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized. Use of larger lots, variable setbacks and variable building structural techniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected. Structures shall blend with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors. Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours, or using grade separations. 30 and over This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited. The vision for the Hillside Focus Area includes: ■ Limit development to densities that do not exceed the capacity of the City to provide public services and adequate public safety or the capacity of the land; in particular, the City's ability to protect any new development from wildland and fires is a significant concern ■ Protect visually prominent natural landforms and other sensitive land resources ■ Protect natural resources and sensitive habitat ■ Provide opportunities to experience natural habitats through education programs for students and trail extensions ■ Maintain a natural "visual frame"for the northern edge of the City Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-49 General Plan Implementation Tools Conventional zoning districts consistent with land use designations in the General Plan will be used to implement the General Plan in many instances. By law, these districts and land use categories must be consistent with each other. The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code identifies the Development Districts that govern the use of properties. Table LU-20 identifies the consistency between the General Plan Land Use Designations and Development Districts. However, a number of considerations suggest that some form of customized zoning is appropriate as an implementation device. Several techniques are authorized under the General Plan, such as the Master Plan Overlay District, Specific Plan, and Planned Community Zoning. Master Plan Overlay District The Master Plan Overlay District is a combining district included in the Development Code that calls for preparation of a conceptual master plan as a precursor to development approval. Use of this implementation tool requires attention to development issues that may not be readily resolved through the use of conventional zoning districts or site development standards. The Master Plan Overlay District allows the City to address issues such as circulation, drainage, open space linkages, trail connections, compatibility with adjacent uses, and similar concerns through a comprehensive approach and creative design flexibility. Where Mixed Use designations are involved, use combinations and proportions can also be used to create more satisfactory results. Locations requiring this approach are shown on the General Plan Land Use Policy Map, Figure LU-1. Specific Plan Specific plans allow for flexibility in design and customized development standards tailored to specific needs and conditions. The Specific Plan is one of the most creative tools available for guiding and regulating development, but also requires considerable attention to detail and may be too involved for some situations. As specified by the California Government Code, a specific plan must be consistent with the General Plan and must respond to all of the required General Plan topics to the extent that they apply to the area in question. One of the problems associated with any customized zoning approach is that it imposes additional administrative burdens on the City. This is because each specific plan contains customized rules that may not be found elsewhere in the City's regulatory system. To simplify the situation, development regulations for these plans have been incorporated into the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Planned Community Zoning Planned Community Zoning may be thought of as a less comprehensive form of a Specific Plan. It does allow custom design and development regulations, but its scope can be limited to only those aspects of the plan that deviate from conventional zoning requirements. It may include as many land use categories as are needed to implement the applicable General Plan designations. It is typically accompanied by thorough design guidelines to ensure a coherent, quality result as the Planning Area is built out. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-50 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-20: General Plan Land Use Designations and Development District Consistency Matrix Land Use Am Development Districts Residential MMMA Very Low _ VL-Very Low Low L-Low Low Medium LM-Low Medium' Medium ' M-Medium' Medium High — MH-Medium High High H-High Com Office OP-Office and Professional Neighborhood Commercial NC-Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial GC-General Commercial Commercial Recreation Mixed= MMMMIIIIIIIIIIIIII SP-Specific Plan Districts Mixed Use PC-Planned Community Districts City Corridor—Moderate MU-GU—Mixed Use—General Urban City Corridor—High MU-UCR—Mixed Use—Urban Corridor City Center MU-UCT—Mixed Use—Urban Center Industrial Industrial Park IP- Industrial Park General Industrial GI -General Industrial Heavy Industrial HI/MI—Heavy Industrial/Minimum Impact HI/RS-Heavy Industrial/Rail-Served Open Space Hillside Residential HR—Hillside Residential District Conservation - OS-Open Space Open Space Flood Control/Utility Corridor FC- Flood Control UC-Utility Corridor Public Facility Civic/Regional All Zoning Districts Schools All Zoning Districts Parks All Zoning Districts Note: 1. Development Code allows multi-unit residential in LM (Low Medium) under optional standards, and single-unit detached residential in M(Medium)under optional standards. Adopted Specific Plans The Specific Plans and Planned Communities identified in Table LU-21 and Figure LU-5 have been approved by the City. In 1999, the Development Code was amended Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-51 to incorporate the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. These Specific Plans are no longer stand-alone documents. A summary of each is provided below. Table LU-21: Adopted Specific Plans and Planned Communities Name Acreage Date Adopted Specific Plans Etiwanda North Specific Plan 6,850 1992 Etiwanda Specific Plan 3,000 1983 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 560 1987 Industrial Area Specific Plan 5,000 1981 Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (Empire Lakes) 380 1994 Planned Communities Caryn Planned Community Development Plan 244 1986 Terra Vista Community Plan 1,321 1983 Victoria Community Plan 2,150 1981 Etiwanda North Specific Plan The same development pressure that prompted the 1983 Etiwanda Specific Plan also necessitated the need for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, adopted in 1992. The plan area is located just north of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A portion of the Specific Plan area lies outside the City and outside the Sphere of Influence. Open space is the most prominent feature of the Etiwanda North area, which is comprised of a gently sloping alluvial fan and chaparral habitat situated on the lower slopes of the foothills. Drainage courses throughout the Etiwanda North area support a variety of tree species, including oak, sycamore, and walnut, among others. A unique feature of the area is a freshwater marsh, approximately 11 acres in size, located in the northwestern portion of the area. Open space is expected to remain a prominent feature even after development occurs. The Specific Plan builds upon the unique character and charm of the Etiwanda Specific Plan area by providing a land use pattern that extends the low-density character of Old Etiwanda into the Etiwanda North area. Etiwanda Specific Plan Etiwanda can be described as a rural community, characterized by large land parcels, eucalyptus tree rows, remnants of citrus groves and vineyards, stone curbs, and other elements that convey its unique and historic sense of place. The Specific Plan area is located within the northeast corner of the City and is roughly bounded by the 1-15 to the southeast, the City's Sphere of Influence to the north, the Victoria Planned Community to the west and the City's industrial area to the south. The Specific Plan project area encompasses over 3,000 acres. The main purpose of the Specific Plan is to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of the City. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan provides a balanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard by taking advantage of opportunities in future community growth. The plan calls for a series of activity centers and gateways, linked through a unifying suburban parkway design. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-52 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Figure LU-5: Specific Plans and Planned Communities Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-53 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-54 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN An additional purpose is to capture and reflect the historic significance of this route as part of the legendary Route 66 that linked Los Angeles and Chicago for several critical decades during the twentieth century. Such landmarks as the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp Restaurant symbolize that memorable period in the emergence of Southern California as a mecca for families seeking a better life. The combination of use patterns, development standards, and design guidelines of the plan testify to the area's complex planning issues and the need for creative regulatory devices. Ultimately, the goal of the Specific Plan is to give this critical centerpiece of the City the prominence it deserves. Industrial Area Specific Plan The Industrial Area Specific Plan is a particularly significant specific plan due to its successful role in the development of the City's industrial base (which is a critical component of an overall long-term balance of uses). Part of this success can be attributed to the quality standards incorporated into the Specific Plan and the protection those standards afford to business investors in this area. The Specific Plan, encompassing nearly 5,000 acres, has been divided into three zones and 19 subareas. The subareas represent specific land use characteristics and development constraints which can be dealt with on a subarea basis rather than through the application of broadly applied development standards. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to establish specific standards and guidelines that will be used for development throughout the City's industrial area. Industrial Area Specific Plan Sub-Area 18 Plan (Empire Lakes) The purpose of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is to provide for a broader mix of land uses than was originally permitted within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The plan was expanded to include such uses as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses. These uses are intended to surround the existing 18-hole golf course. A subsequent amendment to further expand the use list included limited multi-unit residential development to maximize potential use of the Metrolink Station near Milliken Avenue. Adopted Planned Communities Caryn Planned Community Development Plan The Caryn Planned Community Development Plan, now completed, lies north of the Victoria planned community. The community's special identity is provided by an elementary school, single-unit residential development, and walking trails that tie the community together. Terra Vista Community Plan The Terra Vista Community Plan area is centrally located in Rancho Cucamonga and encompasses 1,321 acres. It is comprised of four distinct neighborhoods, with a greenway serving as the backbone connector. The area is planned for a mix of residential and commercial uses, with a large concentration of commercial and office uses along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue that serves as a community-wide activity center. Victoria Community Plan The Victoria Community Plan area encompasses 2,150 acres and provides for a series of residential villages and related support uses, designed around a central spine called Victoria Park Lane. Victoria Community Plan includes the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-55 Areas Subject to Flooding According to State law as revised in 2007 (AB 162), General Plan land use chapters must identify and annually review the areas covered by the General Plan that are subject to flooding, as identified by floodplain mapping by either the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources (DWR). Flooding concerns are discussed in detail in the Public Health and Safety Chapter. See Figure PS-5, Flood Hazards, in the Public Health and Safety Chapter for map identifying flood hazards. 100-year floods have a 1.0 FEMA, through the National Flood Insurance Program, produces Flood Insurance percent chance of occurring Rate Maps (FIRM) that identify property and buildings in flood insurance risk areas. each year. 500-year floods FIRMs (2008) indicate areas that are subject to 100-year and 500-year floods. The have a 0.2 percent chance of areas subject to 100-year floods are located along the Cucamonga Creek Channel, occurring each year. Demens Creek Channel and uplands, Etiwanda Creek Channel, and upper Day Creek within the Sphere of Influence. There are also smaller 100-year flood areas scattered throughout the City. The State Department of Water Resources has initiated the Awareness Floodplain Mapping project, with the goal of identifying all pertinent flood hazard areas in California by 2015 for areas that are not mapped under the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program, and to provide the community and residents with an additional tool for understanding potential flood hazards that are currently not mapped as a regulated floodplain. The awareness maps identify the 100-year flood hazard areas using approximate assessment procedures. As of 2009, the State Department of Water Resources had not prepared any flood studies for San Bernardino County. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-56 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Key Land Use Issues Key issues relative to land use are: ■ Protecting Established, Stable Residential Neighborhoods. Rancho Cucamonga's stable residential neighborhoods are an asset to the community. While proposed development in and around predominantly single-unit residential neighborhoods needs to be carefully evaluated, it is also important to recognize that some land use compatibility issues can be addressed through proper design. Transitions between single-unit residential and more intensive uses are inevitable, and new development will incorporate strategies and measures that will continue to protect single- unit residential neighborhoods. ■ Infill Development. Rancho Cucamonga will be encouraging development of vacant or underutilized land located in the built-up areas of the City. Any new infill development should be planned to be complementary with surrounding development and to minimize impacts. Appropriate infrastructure and supporting services must be adequate or in place to serve new infill development without sacrificing services to the existing population. Rancho Cucamonga must also work hard to assist in land assembly and lot consolidation to create more successful infill development projects. ■ Linking Transportation and Land Use. As Rancho Cucamonga moves forward, it will be essential to connect land use decisions with transportation improvements. As stated earlier, Rancho Cucamonga is a very automobile- oriented community, but new opportunities such as Mixed Use development along Foothill Boulevard, the opening of the Pacific Electric Trail, and Victoria Gardens show the potential to increase walking, bicycling, and transit options. See the Community Mobility Chapter for more information regarding transportation and land use linkages. ■ Revitalizing Older, Deteriorating Areas. Some areas of Rancho Cucamonga are showing signs of deterioration, deferred maintenance, and the inadequacy of pre-incorporation standards for development. Attention must be given to these areas before conditions become worse. ■ Protection of Hillsides. Hillside development is a sensitive issue since it involves the loss of open space, fire protection issues, and can disrupt views of mountainsides. Issues that need to be addressed when considering hillside development include, but are not limited to, views and vistas, fire safety, excessive grading and scarring of land, and habitat protection. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-57 Land Use Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are aimed at providing guidance and policy direction regarding land use in Rancho Cucamonga. GOAL LU-1: Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community-serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of residents. Policy L1.1-11 Protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga has many stable, high-quality residential neighborhoods that constitute a significant part of the City's character. Without land use controls, new development could encroach on these areas and diminish the quality of life in these neighborhoods. Policy 1-1.142: Designate appropriate land uses to serve local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga is located near major transportation corridors including the 1-10, 1-15, and SR-210 freeways, as well as major roadways such as Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. Because of the recognized quality of development within Rancho Cucamonga, the City can serve both local and regional needs. Policy L1.1-1.1 Encourage commercial centers that serve a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. Discussion: The community seeks a range of neighborhood, community, and regional commercial centers at convenient locations throughout the City. The locations of various types of centers, as guided by the General Plan land use designations, are expected to provide reasonable competition and choice of merchandise for residents and visitors. Policy 1-1.144: Continue code enforcement activities to ensure proper maintenance of homes, buildings, yards, and neighborhoods in all areas of the City, and work with businesses and homeowners to gain compliance. Discussion: Although many of Rancho Cucamonga neighborhoods and commercial businesses are stable and attractive, it is important to maintain a high level of maintenance standards to prevent deterioration that would impact property values and the overall character of the City. Policy 1-1.145: Development of densities and intensities shall be implemented within the ranges specified in the General Plan; neither higher nor lower than the limits of the range. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-58 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: To achieve the goals of the General Plan, land resources should be developed as efficiently as possible, yet should not exceed the ranges specified in the land use categories. If a land use change is proposed, a General Plan amendment is required in order to properly evaluate and consider that change. Development within the allowed density/intensity range is performance-driven, and only rarely will development be allowed at the upper end of the range. Policy L1.146: Encourage small-lot, single-unit attached and/or detached residential development (5,200-square-foot lots or smaller) to locate in areas where this density would be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga takes pride in the quality of its residential neighborhoods and the predominantly single-unit character. The General Plan seeks to retain that primary character while also providing for a variety of housing densities. Diversity of housing types is important for long-term sustainability of the community, and a variety of housing densities can be accommodated in appropriate locations. GOAL LU-2: Facilitate sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods and is accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles. Policy 1-11-2.1: Plan for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly Mixed Use and high- -Earth density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. Discussion: Based on a comprehensive land use analysis, the General Plan identifies areas that are appropriate for Mixed Use development. Generally, these areas are located along Foothill Boulevard, although other limited areas designated for Mixed Use development are located within the southern industrial section of the City. The General Plan allows considerable latitude in terms of the mix of uses and development density/intensity to encourage excellence of design, integrated uses, and sustainability in Mixed Use development. Policy 1-1.1-2.2: Require new infill development to be designed for BOd��� pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide Y connections to transit and bicycle facilities. Discussion: While the development pattern of Rancho Cucamonga demands significant automobile usage to get from one use to another, the General Plan seeks to achieve a more balanced mix of transportation choices as the City evolves. Consequently, the General Plan expands the potential for Mixed Use development in key areas. Development of higher-density housing mixed with a variety of commercial and civic uses, and public spaces, with convenient access for pedestrians, bicycle riders, and transit users will have positive impacts on air quality, mobility, and other general quality of life measures. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-59 Policy 1-1-1-2.1 Provide direct pedestrian connections between development BOd��� projects where possible. ]I Discussion: Development should include access for pedestrians, bicycles, earth transit, as well as automobiles. Focus should be placed on creating a more pedestrian-friendly environment that encourages both walking and bicycling. This connectivity will provide for and maintain the existing high level of public safety provided to residents. Policy LU-2.4: Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas. Discussion: The General Plan encourages the development of vacant residential lots where they are largely surrounded by other residential development to maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and to meet housing demand. Land use controls that include development standards will ensure that infill development is compatible with neighboring uses. Policy LU-2.5: Facilitate effective use of land constrained by challenging parcel sizes and dimensions, and encourage consolidation of parcels to provide greater development flexibility. Discussion: Where properties or vacant lands have not been developed or revitalized due to insufficient property sizes, the General Plan encourages consolidation of properties. Financial incentives, increased density/intensity bonuses to help spur development, or greater flexibility in development standards are effective tools that can be utilized to facilitate parcel consolidation where desired. GOAL LU-3: Encourage sustainable development patterns that link transportation improvements and planned growth, create a healthy balance of jobs and housing, and protect the natural environment. Policy LU-3.1: Encourage the creation and maintenance of regional employment, cultural and retail destinations, as well as a full range of amenities and services to support residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Discussion: The Rancho Cucamonga community currently enjoys a wealth of various employment, cultural, entertainment, and retail destinations. The General Plan recognizes that the City will need to continue to attract and maintain a balanced mix of uses, a range of amenities, and high-quality development to adequately meet the needs of the growing population base. Policy 1-1-1-3.2: Encourage a mix of retail, service, industrial and manufacturing, and professional uses that create diverse, well-paying employment opportunities. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-60 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: A diverse employment base that includes different business sectors allows for a diverse workforce and income levels. This diversity allows for competitive salaries and rewarding employment opportunities for all levels of society. Further, a diverse employment base maximizes job opportunities for Rancho Cucamonga residents. The General Plan establishes a comprehensive set of land use designations that allows flexibility and responsiveness to market conditions and supports a diversity of businesses. Policy LU-3.1 Locate regionally serving land uses with immediate access earth to the regional transportation network that is designed to provide maximum access capabilities and permit maximum dispersal of traffic. Discussion: Regional-serving businesses depend on good access to the regional transportation network. Consequently, the General Plan designates areas near the 1-15 corridor and the area surrounding Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 for important commercial and Mixed Use development. Policy 1-11-3.4: Promote development that is sustainable in its use of land -Earth and that limits impacts to natural resources, energy, and air and water quality. Discussion: Since incorporation, development in the City has been held to very high site development standards and exacting aesthetic requirements. The level of community standards are high and it is important to preserve the qualities that Rancho Cucamonga has achieved. The General Plan carries forward the community expectations of excellence, and enhances those expectations with new policies and guidelines that strongly encourage new development to incorporate sustainability in site design, construction and building materials, and long-term operations. Policy LlJ-3.5: Work toward a sustainable jobs-housing balance by -Earth accommodating a range and balance of land uses within Rancho Cucamonga. Discussion: The General Plan establishes diverse commercial, industrial, and Mixed Use land use designations that allow many opportunities for business development. Prime commercial and industrial areas are protected from encroachment of uses that will diminish the utility of those areas for their intended purpose. The Mixed Use designations also promote a sustainable mix of residential and commercial development. Policy LU-3.6: Create focused, pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods that are r reminiscent of the qualities found in earlier days, particularly Bodyma within the original communities of Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda, and along Historic Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard). Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-61 Discussion: Many historic neighborhoods built in Southern California were designed for walking, so older neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga are often more walkable than newer developments. Improved walkability means better pedestrian connections between neighborhoods and schools, parks and open space, and commercial centers. Pedestrian-friendly approaches should be incorporated into all new development as part of the Healthy RC Initiative. Policy LU-3.7: Encourage new development projects to build on vacant -Earth infill sites within a built-out area, and/or redevelop previously developed properties that are underutilized. Discussion: Infill development puts more people near shops, restaurants, and other amenities, which increases the liveliness of an area and the economic viability of its businesses. Infill projects can provide neighborhood centers with a Main Street flavor, including the presence of civic buildings and public places. Infill and redevelopment of this nature creates more sustainable development that improves efficiencies in the use of infrastructure and the use of land, and over time improves efficiencies in energy and transportation. Policy LU-3.8: Implement land use patterns and policies that incorporate earth smart growth practices, including placement of higher densities near transit centers and along transit corridors, allowing Mixed Use development, and encouraging and accommodating pedestrian movement. Discussion: Smart growth emphasizes accessibility, meaning that the activities people use frequently are located close together. Its practices integrate transportation and land use decisions by encouraging more compact, Mixed Use development within existing urban areas and along transit lines, such as Omnitrans bus routes and possible future Bus Rapid Transit lines. Higher- density development along transit corridors could lead to fewer automobile trips as residents opt for transit use, particularly along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Policy 1-1.1-3.9: Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working with property owners, developers, local businesses, and other community organizations to coordinate efforts. Discussion: Several aging commercial shopping centers located in the western portion of Rancho Cucamonga are in need of revitalization or a major facelift. Revitalization of aging commercial centers will assist in maintaining a healthy, strong tax base and provide improved commercial services for surrounding residential neighborhoods. Policy LU-3.10: Reserve appropriate areas of land for institutional uses to ensure that necessary services are provided to all areas of the community, and to encourage the creation of job opportunities for Rancho Cucamonga residents. Discussion: Industrial land areas are limited and a precious economic resource. The City needs to pay close attention to maintaining a proper balance of uses and will assist non-industrial users in finding appropriate locations throughout the City. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-62 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Policy LU-3.11: New development should be permitted especially where it is logical to extend existing infrastructure improvements and includes housing of varied densities. Discussion: Our Planning Area is almost 50 square miles, and we seek to have the City develop in an organized fashion. We much prefer to expand in a cost-effective way by avoiding the leapfrog development patterns typical of some areas that experience high growth pressures. GOAL LU-4: Establish a pedestrian-friendly Foothill Boulevard corridor that facilitates transit use and provides a range of commercial destinations to serve bath local and regional needs. Policy 1-1-1-4.1: Provide new Mixed Use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor to allow residential, commercial, Body and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. Discussion: A key focus of the Foothill Boulevard planning concept is the design of an attractive, pedestrian-oriented corridor that promotes the use of walking, biking, and transit, and that supports the potential for higher-density mixed commercial and residential uses throughout the corridor. Policy 1-1.1-4.2: Concentrate community- and regional-serving uses on Foothill Boulevard (east of Haven Avenue), providing a range of commercial, office, residential, restaurant, and entertainment-related uses. Discussion: Eastern Foothill Boulevard (east of Haven Avenue) will focus more on community and regionally focused retail and commercial service land uses. There will be some opportunities to integrate residential, commercial, office, and medical uses. These uses are meant to work together to create an environment that is pedestrian friendly, but also accommodates transit, bicycle, and automobile use. Policy 1-1-1-4.1 Focus neighborhood-serving uses on Foothill Boulevard (west of Haven Avenue), and encourage a range of commercial and residential uses. Discussion: Western Foothill Boulevard (west of Haven Avenue) should focus on improving neighborhood-serving retail and commercial services to better meet the needs of surrounding residential neighborhoods. There will be opportunities to integrate residential and commercial uses as Mixed Use at designated properties. Policy LU-4.4: Concentrate commercial uses near major intersections. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-63 Discussion: Concentrating large commercial centers at major intersections will result in an improved critical mass of commercial activity at accessible locations and accommodate greater vehicular traffic, while addressing commercial needs of the community. Better defined and designed commercial development at these locations also has the potential to become community focal points. Policy LU-4.5: Continue to reinforce the identity of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue by supporting development projects that are comparable to the quality of the Civic Center and County Courthouse complex, Terra Vista Town Center, and the adaptive re-use of the historic Virginia Dare Winery. Discussion: The intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue is an important area of the City due to the civic uses of the City Hall and Courthouse complex, the re-use of the Virginia Dare Winery, the Town Square Mixed Use project, and the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center. Policy WAR Accommodate land uses that support the activity centers envisioned in the Historic Cucamonga sector, as identified in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Discussion: Creating identifiable centers is important in placemaking. Building on the City's historic routes is a viable way to create meaningful places with appropriate land uses. See the Historic Resources section of this Chapter for more information regarding historic districts. GOAL LU-5: Support a regionally serving office district that provides professional and technical employment opportunities for the Inland Empire. Policy LU-5.1: Create a central business hub at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, extending south to 4t" Street, with higher-intensity office, commercial, and public/quasi- public uses. Discussion: To accommodate more office and professional uses in Rancho Cucamonga, Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and the City's southern boundary, is planned as the City's office district. The proximity to transportation, including the freeways, Metrolink, and the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system will benefit workers as well as reducing the need for the automobile for commuting. Policy 1-1.1-5.2: Encourage development along the Haven Avenue Corridor that incorporates appropriate intensity and design excellence for an important gateway to Rancho Cucamonga. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-64 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: Haven Avenue is a major gateway into the City from the south and 1-10; consequently, development in this area is very important to the City's image. Future office and business park development at this gateway location, particularly at major street intersections such as Haven Avenue and 41" Street, should be appealing, eye-catching, and representative of the design quality found throughout the City. Further, the inclusion of certain iconic design elements can foster a unique gateway identity. Policy LU-5.3: Promote the Haven Avenue Corridor as a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere that caters to professional, technological, and similar businesses in a campus-like setting with a prestigious identity. Discussion: The Haven Avenue Corridor is an outstanding location for office/business park usage. The proximity to the Civic Center, freeways, Metrolink, and the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system is convenient for business and reduces the need to commute by automobile. The location is close to the LA/Ontario International Airport without any of the negative impacts of being near such a facility. Policy LU-5.4: Promote a pedestrian-friendly corridor where employees can BOd � walk to restaurants, commercial services, and other -`1 amenities in the area. Discussion: Haven Avenue is planned to accommodate a more pedestrian- friendly environment with retail and dining opportunities within walking distance so that employees and visitors can walk to amenities. Policy LU-5.5: Require development to provide courtyards and plazas, public art, and landscaped open spaces that promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscaped pathways between buildings and along Haven Avenue. Discussion: As an important gateway to the City, Haven Avenue is intended to accommodate a well-designed, business-friendly environment that can be enjoyed by employees and visitors. High-quality public spaces that connect to other buildings and other properties, parking areas, sidewalks, streets, and transit are design features that contribute to walkability, and the creation of sustainable development. These public spaces can include public art, shaded resting areas, and a variety of hardscape and softscape surfaces to create a more pleasant environment. Policy LU-5.E: Support the integration of transportation facilities, including transit, to support the office environment. Discussion: Haven Avenue is a heavily used roadway that connects major land uses in the City, including Chaffey College, Terra Vista Town Center, the Civic Center, large office complexes, and LA/Ontario International Airport. Over the long term, it will be important to integrate land uses with transportation opportunities due to the various activity centers located along Haven Avenue. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-65 GOAL LU-6: Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods. Policy LU-6.1: Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs. Discussion: The residential neighborhoods in southwest Rancho Cucamonga are not well served by any commercial shopping centers, in large part due to a lack of proximity. The closest centers are located south in neighboring Ontario or in the Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue areas. However, there are several community centers in southwest Rancho Cucamonga, including the Northtown Community Center (affiliated with the Northtown Housing Development Corporation) and the RC Family Resource Center, that provide community services to area residents. Policy 1-11-6.2: Minimize impacts of industrial development and truck traffic in residential areas or on residential streets. Discussion: Southwest Rancho Cucamonga contains residential neighborhoods that are interspersed with industrial development. Some pockets of residential uses are located in close proximity to industrial uses and can be affected by noise, vibrations, and truck traffic. Wherever possible, these impacts existing from development should be addressed through code enforcement. New development should include mitigation such as limits on hours of operation, buffering through sound walls, site design and landscaping, and traffic control enhancements to reduce adverse impacts to residential neighborhoods. Policy Lll-6.3: Protect and preserve historical sites that reflect the area's long-standing agricultural heritage. Discussion: The historic Northtown community is located in southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Several historic structures are still standing within this community. It is vital to the heritage of the community to preserve these buildings, wherever possible. The General Plan encourages adaptive re-use and other historic incentives to protect buildings. See the Historic Resources section of this Chapter for more information regarding historic structures. Policy 1-11-13A Support infrastructure improvements that encourage investment in southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Discussion: Maintenance and investment in infrastructure and services are essential to improving the stability and vitality of southwest Rancho Cucamonga. The condition of the area's infrastructure and buildings, particularly sidewalks and streetscapes, as well as availability of services or lack thereof, communicate a great deal about a community identity. Well-maintained, inviting, aesthetically pleasing elements make a strong quality statement about Rancho Cucamonga as a whole, and are particularly important in conveying the message that southwest Rancho Cucamonga is a desirable area for business investment. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Policy LU-6.5: Encourage the re-use and rehabilitation of historic or high- quality existing buildings. Discussion: Re-use of existing buildings conserves building materials in a way that is not possible for new development, and is therefore highly consistent with the sustainability goals of the community. Historic buildings, if preserved, can significantly contribute to the unique character of a neighborhood. See the Historic Resources section of this Chapter for more information regarding historic structures. GOAL LU-7: Encourage diverse employment-generating land uses that are clean and modern, and that incorporate green technologies. Policy Lu-7.1: Concentrate heavy industrial and utility-related uses in the area immediately surrounding the electrical power plant. Discussion: Historically, more intensive industrial uses have located near the electrical power plant in an area on Etiwanda Avenue, south of Arrow Highway. Continued use of this area for heavy industrial activity will help the City avoid dependency on too narrow a spectrum of industrial and commercial businesses, and some accommodation of heavy industry is important for the City's economic health and jobs-housing balance. However, future economic development does not require a significant expansion of heavy industrial uses, particularly of a visually intrusive nature. Policy 1-11-7.2: Support infrastructure improvements to attract light earth industrial and manufacturing uses, green technology uses, energy-related businesses, and research and development uses. Discussion: Future development of a range of light industrial uses will create job opportunities for Rancho Cucamonga residents. By investing in infrastructure that serves green technology businesses, and by providing desired amenities, Rancho Cucamonga can establish itself as a leader in green and clean technologies. This reputation will further attract desirable industries that, in turn, further improve the jobs-housing balance. Policy L1.1-7.1 Support public and quasi-public uses in southeast Rancho Cucamonga that are complementary to heavy industrial land uses. Discussion: The West Valley Detention Center, Reliant Energy Etiwanda Generating Station, and Metropolitan Water District facilities are all located in southeast Rancho Cucamonga. Additional uses that could be accommodated in the area include complementary public and quasi-public uses such as passive solar and wind power generation plants and recycling facilities. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-67 GOAL LU-8: Encourage visually attractive hillsides where the natural environment is protected, a sustainable level of development is ensured, and appropriate measures to protect against hazards are in place. Policy LU-8.1: Regulate development on natural slopes of eight percent -Earth grade or greater through the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. Discussion: The Development Code contains a comprehensive set of hillside development regulations that are applied to all projects within a hillside area (eight percent slope or greater), including parcel maps, tentative tract maps, and site plans. The regulations establish special review procedures; methods for slope determination; guidelines and standards for site design, road construction, landscaping, architecture, drainage, and grading; and provisions for transfer of dwelling unit allocations. The Ordinance encourages innovative design that is sensitive to the unique characteristics of hillside areas. The Hillside Ordinance applies to areas within the City and the Sphere of Influence, although the County of San Bernardino has final land use decision power if the area is not annexed to the City. Policy 1-1.1-8.2: Approve only those residential densities that do not exceed earth the capacity of the land or the ability to reasonably provide public services and adequate public safety. Discussion: The Hillside Development Ordinance provides slope density regulations that correlate the intensity of development to the steepness of the terrain in order to establish the carrying capacity of a site (buildable area). This ensures that the amount of development in slope areas can be adequately supported by roads and other essential services. Regulating density based on the terrain is also used to minimize grading impacts, minimize removal of vegetation, and address landslide and fire hazards. Policy LU-8.3: Require adequate access for emergency vehicles and evacuations. Discussion: Providing access in the event of an emergency is crucial for the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. Hillside residents must be able to evacuate and emergency vehicles must be able to get to properties in a timely manner. Multiple roadway options shall be required in the event that one of the roadways is blocked or inaccessible. Roadway planning in the hillside terrain must be reviewed by the Fire District and the Engineering Department. Policy LU-8.4: Prohibit extensive disturbances and scarring of ridgelines earth and other distinctive landforms in the hillsides. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-68 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: The scarring of hillsides through extensive grading can be visible to most of Rancho Cucamonga. This scarring is unattractive, changes the hillside character, removes native vegetation, and visually impacts most of the community. Hillside development can be accomplished through sensitive site design and grading techniques. Policy LU-8.5: Protect natural resources and sensitive habitat areas, and Barth avoid encroachment from new hillside development. Discussion: The hillsides of Rancho Cucamonga include important natural resources such as water recharge areas and sensitive habitat such as the alluvial fan sage scrub. In order to continue to supply the City with adequate water, recharge areas must be maintained. An additional benefit is the preservation of wildlife corridors. Policy LU-B.E: Require that hillside development minimize alteration of Earth natural landforms, and encourage clustering where feasible to retain maximum open space. Discussion: The objectives for managing development in hillside areas are to maintain existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines wherever feasible. Furthermore, the City should avoid development that would result in fire, flooding, landslide, erosion, and other safety hazards. The City seeks hillside development that limits the extent of grading alterations to natural landforms, and provides for innovative design and arrangement of building sites that retain significant natural habitats and features. Clustering is a way of laying out a project whereby the structures are "clustered" together and open space is shared by the residents. Policy 1-1.1-8.7: Blend hillside development with natural surroundings Earththrough architecture and the use of appropriate construction materials, colors, and natural vegetation. Discussion: Building designs can accommodate the natural terrain by incorporating split pads or stepped footings, or by detaching part of the dwelling such as the garage. Building massing, height, and roof design are also important elements in preserving the character of the hillside. Construction materials that blend with the terrain include treated wood, wood-like materials, or river rock. Landscaping standards around hillside properties include erosion control and the use of fuel modification zones around all structures in hillside areas, as required by the Fire District. This includes the use of fire resistant vegetation, proper spacing of trees and shrubs, and annual clearance of debris. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-69 Policy LU-8.8: Provide conveniently located places to experience nature in -Earth the northerly reaches of the Planning Area, particularly through trail extensions and educational programs. Bod" Discussion: Trails located in the hillsides and Sphere of Influence can provide J opportunities for the public to experience the natural environment. The North Etiwanda Preserve is an example of providing trails for the public to enjoy within protected open space areas. Other examples include access to Cucamonga Canyon or the San Bernardino National Forest. Linear buffer parks are another example. Such parks simultaneously manage, maintain, and preserve the natural ecosystem while providing a visually appealing, educational, and light recreational use fire break between hillside development and the open undisturbed Wildland areas. Policy LU-8.9: Restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by natural or man-made hazards. Discussion: Certain portions of our City are vulnerable to flooding and wildfire damage. Though other hazards exist, these two are the most prevalent. We want to make sure that intensities of development in areas vulnerable to these hazards are kept to a minimum and, in the limited cases where they do occur, that life and property are protected to the maximum degree feasible. Policy LU-8.10: Hillside development shall be controlled by customized regulations. Discussion: Public safety and aesthetic implications for the limited hillside terrain in our City require special design attention. Moreover, particularly in the Sphere of Influence area, the visual impact of development on the rest of our community is substantial. Consequently, we will maintain and apply stringent hillside development standards. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Community Design Rancho Cucamonga has long stood apart from other communities in the Inland Empire by focusing on high-quality development with a persistent attention to detail in matters of design. This investment in community design has created an excellent foundation for continuing these practices, and this General Plan identifies how the City will continue to sustain and build upon its past achievements. Community design is not just about aesthetics; community design has distinct functional dimensions as well. This is especially true in Rancho Cucamonga. The City evolved from three historic communities (Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda). The City faced the challenge of not only respecting the qualities of these communities, but achieving a coherence and identity for the City as a whole. Design, therefore, applies at multiple levels, from citywide, to district, to neighborhood, and down to individual projects. Community design policies at any scale must lead to creating places and environments that are alive, function effectively, promote health and sustainability (public, social, and economic), respect people, have meaning, and create a sense of identity and place. Linear systems—highways, streets, sidewalks, trails, and open space corridors, for example—must perform both a useful function as well as contribute to the aesthetic qualities that make an enjoyable living environment. General Design Principles The principles for achieving this overall objective include the following: ■ Innovative design, regardless of its style, is more important to the achievement of "quality" than the use of any predetermined theme. Innovative design promotes the use of novel variations to solve common and unique problems in urban development. (An exception is where both theme and innovation are essential in districts with a strong historical character). ■ High quality is the result of extensive consideration in providing innovative and appropriate solutions to all aspects of the design. ■ Developments should be designed to serve the community's residents, businesses, and visitors, as well as reflect the community's aesthetic values. ■ Designers are expected to respect and work in concert with community goals, as well as address client requests. ■ Designers should not view their project singularly, but as part of a larger master plan area in which they are responsible for design continuity and compatibility. ■ Rancho Cucamonga does not depend on standardized design solutions; "off the shelf' model buildings which may be accepted elsewhere are not necessarily the acceptable measure of quality design in the community. ■ New developments should acknowledge the positive aspects of nearby existing buildings by incorporating compatible features. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-71 ■ Architectural styles should complement and augment surrounding development. They should convey a sense of thoughtfulness and not expediency. ■ Building elevations should give equal attention to architectural detail and interest on all faces, including the rear. ■ Design in Rancho Cucamonga pays careful attention to detail because that is where real quality is manifested. ■ Be wary of the same architectural style repeated too often or over too large an area. It can become boring and, as a result, no longer communicate quality. ■ Encourage the use of "green" design techniques as outlined in the City's "green" building standards. Pattern and Scale of Development Rancho Cucamonga exhibits a wide variety of building types and forms, from homes, to large shopping centers, to industrial plants. Together these buildings create variation in the form and character of the City. In both direct and indirect ways, the built environment can either foster or inhibit the pursuit of varying lifestyles. In the northwest area of the City for example, a rural pattern of development (large irregular lots and low-scale, large structures) allows for lifestyles that are more agrarian, such as equestrian and agriculture uses. Much of the City exhibits a more suburban pattern of development (small lots, majority single-unit homes) that accommodates family oriented lifestyles, requiring a closer relationship between home, school, and recreation. Within urban centers, such as Victoria Gardens, a more urban development pattern (combined and integrated mix of compatible uses, higher- density, and taller structures) helps create a focused multi-use district. Urbanized areas are intended to be unique and engaging experiences that offer more pedestrian and transit opportunities, convenient access to activities, public spaces, and a wide array of uses. Rancho Cucamonga welcomes and embraces the diversity of form and scale of development. A gradual transition between these various patterns and development styles is desired and needs to be an important consideration in proposed building scale and form. Within this established pattern, distinguishable places have evolved Rancho Cucamonga exhibits that this General Plan refers to as "districts," "neighborhoods," "urban centers," and a wide variety of building "corridors." Each of these has different roles and design elements that need to be types and forms. recognized and fostered in future development. Jf �+s r Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-72 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Districts and Neighborhoods The City has subareas that contain special qualities or unique features that distinguish them. These subareas exist at various scales in size, function, and identity, but may be generally categorized as districts or neighborhoods. Districts tend to be larger areas that may contain a historic or functional similarity. Neighborhoods are smaller areas with a more local focus and identity. Distinguishable districts and neighborhoods can be defined in Rancho Cucamonga using one or more of the following criteria: ■ The area is an historic community that eventually became surrounded by newer development. ■ The area has been master-planned and designed to look and function as a distinguishable place. ■ The area stands apart due to the clustering of similar land uses. The historic communities, or districts, of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda each has its own style of development and types of uses. Within the newer sections of town, the planned communities of Terra Vista and Caryn, for example, have master- planned neighborhoods with ample landscaping. Neighborhood Organization and Design Most established neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga have developed around five basic principles: ■ Neighborhood commercial centers are located conveniently to serve residential neighborhoods. ■ Housing at higher densities is appropriate near shopping centers and along transit corridors. ■ Schools and neighborhood parks are centrally located within neighborhoods. ■ Bicycle and pedestrian paths connect housing with schools and shopping centers. ■ Neighborhood identity is achieved through architectural, landscape, and entry design. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-73 Pedestrian paths and open greens create a V. quality residential �—=-- neighborhood. ■ F 1. - low i - � . These principles have been implemented through various means: specific plans, planned community projects, and incrementally through individual subdivision and commercial developments. Approved specific plans and planned communities are discussed in the Land Use section of this Chapter. Both architectural and landscape design for housing, commercial, and public uses are typically integrated within each specific plan and planned community. Based on Planning Commission actions and policy direction, comprehensive design guidelines for residential development have been prepared by the Planning Department for use by developers, property owners, architects, landscape architects, and others involved in any aspect of housing development. These guidelines cover the following subjects: ■ Desirable site planning techniques for multi-unit and single-unit housing that create active street fronts ■ Proper layout of a subdivision that slows automobile through-traffic, but allows for pedestrian connections and adequate public safety response ■ Architectural guidance for creating a varied and attractive streetscape, with well-thought out design solutions ■ Grading techniques and standards ■ Appropriate use of drought-tolerant landscaping to create a pleasant environment and tie new development into the surrounding context and fire resistant landscaping ■ Preferred fencing materials ■ Trail design for pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian use In general, neighborhood commercial centers should be designed as pedestrian- oriented commercial areas that connect with adjacent residential areas. Site planning should incorporate outdoor gathering areas such as plazas and courtyards. Streetscapes should encourage pedestrian and bicycle activity and include shade, drinking fountains, benches, trash receptacles, and newspaper stands. The Planning Department has prepared design guidelines for commercial development (both Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-74 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN neighborhood and community level) to inform developers, property owners, architects, planners, landscape architects, and civil engineers. These guidelines cover proper site planning techniques, architectural design considerations, landscape design techniques, proper signage, and master planning requirements. Urban Centers and Corridors The General Plan's focus on Mixed Use areas will result in the development of new urban centers within Rancho Cucamonga, extending the range of choice in how the community can live, work, and play. Creative site planning, design, and use configuration will be applied to create urban places that emphasize convenient non- vehicular modes of transportation, "park once" parking facilities, interconnection of uses, usable public spaces, strong architectural design, and variety in scale and open space to provide diversity. The City helps promote healthy lifestyles through design features of urban places. The General Plan requires that urban centers be designed so that people can interact and enjoy outdoor amenities such as gardens, courtyards with fountains, quiet shaded areas for working or reading, and interesting paths to walk to nearby stores and businesses—all activities that provide both emotional and physical stimulation (see Figure LU-6: Community Design Framework). Victoria Gardens will continue to be an important contributor to the diverse offering of lifestyles. New development or redevelopment adjacent to these established urban centers should relate to these areas both physically and functionally. MONO ��x Y V� kr ,, • _ � � I Ft� I - Urban centers are 26, pedestrian-friendly places that include public spaces. Travel Corridors and Streetscapes Travel corridors in Rancho Cucamonga include roadways, bicycle and pedestrian paths, equestrian trails, and railways. Travel routes are not just modes of access but an important way of experiencing the City. Roadways in particular are a means of organizing land uses, welcoming and directing visitors, and establishing a consistent and aesthetically pleasing image through landscape and streetscape design. See the Community Mobility Chapter regarding complete streets and the City's plan to design and operate an entire roadway network with all users in mind, including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-75 wy ,ll y Landscaped medians, The backbone street system within Rancho Cucamonga is well established. Major street lighting,and street travel routes are laid out in a grid pattern that is well connected to adjacent trees all contribute to an communities, facilitating efficient traffic movement and orientation of travelers. The attractive streetscape. City is conveniently connected to the regional freeway system through multiple interchanges at both the 1-15 and SR-210 freeways. The proximity of the freeways also creates important freeway views to commercial, office, and industrial uses within Rancho Cucamonga. The City's adopted street classifications contain a hierarchy of roadways designed to accommodate the traffic volumes and turning movements of anticipated traffic. Street types vary in street width, the number/size of travel and turning lanes, median size and design, and parkway size and design, as shown on Figure CM-3: Typical Roadway Cross Sections in the Community Mobility Chapter. Future roadways will provide the final links within the transportation system and will be designed based on their functional role from both a traffic and land use standpoint. Special Boulevards Street classifications are further defined in Rancho Cucamonga by different patterns of landscape design, layout of bike and pedestrian paths, setback of adjacent structures, street furnishings, lighting, and hardscape treatments. Variations in design may occur along a particular roadway, but the overall intent is to establish certain character and consistency in the appearance of the roadway to reinforce users' mental image or perception of the route. Major intersections have also received special design treatment to distinguish between different districts or neighborhoods, identify major developments or urban centers, or to direct/orient travelers to key destination points. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-76 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Figure LU-6: Community Design Framework Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-77 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-78 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Landscaping, hardscaping, and meandering sidewalks y are some of the r ; _ characteristics of a"Special - — Boulevard." The roadways in Table LU-22 are designated "Special Boulevards" and are to incorporate extensive landscape setback areas, and denote where landscape and hardscape design, trails, and setback standards will be master planned and implemented. All major arterials (divided and undivided) are identified as Special Boulevards, as well as several important secondary and collector segments. The landscape prominence of these roadways has been and will continue to be a focus in the design process for both the private and public sectors. These linkages are described in Table LU-22 in terms of location, improvement classification, and applicable implementation mechanism. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-79 Table LU-22: General Plan Special Boulevards Street Street Segment A�Implementation Am Name Haven North City boundary to Pacific Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Avenue Electric Trail Pacific Electric Trail to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community and Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Foothill to 41h Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Milliken Hillside to 19th Street Caryn Planned Community Avenue th Victoria Planned Community and Milliken 19 to Base Line Road Avenue Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community and Milliken Boulevard Avenue Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard to 4th Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Milliken Avenue Beautification Master Plan Day Creek SR-210 Freeway to Foothill Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Boulevard Boulevard Corridor Master Plan Base Line Haven Avenue to Rochester Terra Vista Planned Community and Base Road Avenue Line Road Beautification Master Plan Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Boulevard Corridor Master Plan Community and Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard to Victoria Planned Community Etiwanda Avenue Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue Etiwanda Specific Plan Community and Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan West of Haven Avenue Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan Foothill Grove Avenue to Eastern Boulevard boundary of Subarea 3 of Foothill Foothill Specific Plan Specific Plan; and 1-15 to East Avenue Western boundary of Industrial Area Specific Plan to Day Creek Industrial Area Specific Plan Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard to 1-15 Victoria Specific Plan Freeway Arrow Industrial Area Specific Plan and adjacent Highway Grove Avenue to East Avenue development for segment between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue Church Haven Avenue to Day Creek Street Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard to eastern Victoria Planned Community boundary of Victoria Planned Community 6th Street West of Haven Avenue to Industrial Area Specific Plan and 6th Street Hellman Avenue Beautification Master Plan 4th Street West of Archibald Avenue to City 4th Street Beautification Master Plan boundary Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-80 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-22: General Plan Special Boulevards Street Street Segment Implementation Name Archibald Northern boundary of City to Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan Avenue Arrow Highway Arrow Highway to 4t"Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan Rochester Base Line Road to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community Avenue Boulevard Foothill Boulevard to southern Industrial Area Specific Plan City limits Miller Eastern boundary of Victoria Avenue Planned Community to East Etiwanda Specific Plan Avenue Etiwanda Wilson Avenue to Arrow Highway Etiwanda and Foothill Specific Plans Avenue East Avenue Wilson Avenue to Foothill Etiwanda Specific Plan Boulevard Wilson Haven Avenue to Milliken Adjacent Development Avenue Avenue Victoria Park Milliken Avenue to Base Line Victoria Planned Community Lane Road Beautification Master Plans During the late 1980s and into the early '90s, Rancho Cucamonga prepared Beautification Master Plans for many of the Special Boulevards. These plans sought to provide consistent direction to development and establish attractive design themes that would reinforce the City's high design standards. In general, the Beautification Master Plans go beyond the typical parkway street tree concept and integrate street enhancement plans into a broader landscape fabric within the entire parkway setback area. Most of the concepts incorporate background or accent trees, rockscape, and even perimeter walls. Design objectives of the Beautification Master Plans are to: ■ Provide identifiable themes along major streets ■ Provide attractive, enduring, and maintainable streetscapes ■ Complement other community improvements ■ Protect the public's health, safety, and welfare These plans are being successfully implemented throughout the City. Table LU-23 lists the Beautification Master Plans and the design focus of each concept. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-81 Table LU-23: Beautification Master Plans Beautification Street Elements addressed by concept Archibald Avenue Parkway/background/accent trees, perimeter walls Base Line Road,west of Haven Avenue Parkway/background/accent trees Base Line Road, east of Haven Avenue Parkway/background trees, entire median Day Creek Boulevard Parkway/background/accent trees, entire median, perimeter walls, community art Haven Avenue Parkway/background trees, entire median Milliken Avenue Parkway/background trees, entire median 4th Street Parkway/background/accent trees, shrubs and hardscape 6th Street Parkway trees, entire median 19th Street Parkway/accent trees, perimeter walls Historic/Special Design Streets Certain roadway sections are worthy of special treatment due to their historic character: Etiwanda Avenue, Hillside Road, Hellman Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard. Provisions for maintaining and/or replacing the trees should be developed to address fire and public safety issues as they occur. ■ Etiwanda Avenue. Etiwanda Avenue, from Wilson Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, was established in 1883 as the main north/south spine through the Etiwanda Colony Lands. The street retains the original rock curbs, eucalyptus tree windrows, and rural character associated with low-density development. Future roadway designs have been adopted as part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The basic design intent is to maintain the current street widths, rock curbs, and existing street trees where possible, and enhance the rural character with additional informal plantings, trails, and extensive setbacks. As future development is proposed, the City needs to carefully define those areas where change to the historic streetscape is required because of traffic demand and public safety. Implementation strategies to discourage the use of Etiwanda Avenue for through traffic should be developed and considered in all future projects along this route. ■ Hillside Road. The segment of Hillside Road between Alta Loma Channel and Hermosa Avenue has been designated for special historic significance, and plans have been developed consistent with its historic character. ■ Hellman Avenue. The segment of Hellman Avenue between Base Line Road and 19th Street has been designated for special historic significance and should be studied to establish street requirements consistent with its historic character. ■ Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66. Foothill Boulevard is a unique historic route for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Southern California, and the western United States. Officially, the numerical designation 66 was assigned to the Chicago-to-Los Angeles route in the summer of 1926. From the outset, public road planners intended Route 66 to connect the main streets of rural and urban communities along its course for the most practical of reasons: most small towns had no prior access to a major national Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-82 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN thoroughfare. Route 66 runs east to west through Rancho Cucamonga and contains historic resources potentially significant for their association with Route 66. i Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan • •, Supplemental to the Special Boulevards designation, the Foothill Boulevard/Historic HISTORIC Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (adopted January 2002) guides the design concepts for the streetscapes, entry areas, and rights-of-way of Foothill ���►.6 Boulevard/Historic Route 66 through the entirety of its run through Rancho Cucamonga. The plan acknowledges the importance of Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 to America's culture and heritage, and works to enhance and reflect the unique historic elements of Historic Route 66 and Rancho Cucamonga. y The plan draws upon positive improvements to Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 and develops a set of unique and unifying historic themes that will be implemented along the Boulevard. The plan provides specific design concepts for the western and _ eastern gateways into the City, and for eight centers along the Foothill Boulevard corridor. The plan also provides concepts for the Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas at various locations, a unifying palette of streetscape furniture, unique Route 66 icons, artwork, and various other visual enhancement concepts that can be utilized in future developments and improvements along the Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Utility Infrastructure Enhancements Plan has implemented public signage and monuments that Improving the visual streetscape in Rancho Cucamonga can be accomplished by reflect the culture and placing overhead utilities underground. Undergrounding utility lines helps maintain heritage of this historic views of the San Bernardino Mountains and avoids visual clutter. Many newer boulevard. districts and residential neighborhoods have had most utility lines installed underground during their initial development. However, many older neighborhoods still have overhead utility lines. Placing overhead utilities underground remains an important aspect of enhancing the aesthetic quality in neighborhoods and major street corridors. A major impediment to undergrounding utility lines is cost. Rancho Cucamonga will consider undergrounding utilities along commercial corridors where it can enhance the streetscape and improve the overall image of the street. Residential neighborhoods interested in removing overhead utilities must work with the City and possibly set up an assessment district or other financing system to help pay for the costs of such improvement. Entry Monuments Entry monuments provide the first impression of Rancho Cucamonga as visitors enter the City. Special attention has been given to the development and design of these gateways. A plan for entry monuments was developed, and a number of intersections have entry monuments installed. The number and location of entry monuments are shown in Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations. The letters identifying each gateway correspond to a description of the gateway, provided in Table LU-24: Entry Monuments Design Elements. Each site will have to be designed to complement the surrounding streetscape and architecture, while following the design. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-83 ---------- i_;-----i I------------------i I � l ' Hillside Rd. ' I ' ' Wilson Ave. I ' Wilson Ave. , Banyon St. Banyon St. s L K J O N M a a a a a d ` > L I 0f j � (Lj W (.) a> Base Line Rd. W "' VV _v o R > I P cor- 2 = Churc i Ave. H 1 Q Foothill Blvd. a I G R 'O Arrow H Arrow H . 8th ft. I r h T 6th St. A B C 4th St. Entry Monuments OIllustration showing typical freeway off-ramp configuration: Major Gateway Entry Monuments w;, ENTRY L MONUMENT O Secondary Gateway — - ti ,....... 0 Foothill Boulevard Entry Monuments 'O Standard Entry-3 Corners ROUTE 210 2 .''1' Standard Entry-2 Corners 0 Standard Entry-1 Corner =��-������������'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`�����. OMid-Block Entry Monument ENTRY MONUMENT Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-84 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Table LU-24: Entry Monuments Design Elements This existing gateway has elements of Mission Revival form,with cobblestone walls. A Its elements may be included in future gateway locations where a more historic or traditional look is desired. B The eastern half of this gateway was completed first and the western side was designed to match it. C This existing gateway is constructed of cobblestone, concrete, and granite tiles with applied brass letters. Both sides of the street are completed. D This gateway is completed and will act as an example for future smaller entry monumentation. This gateway should be designed to generally follow existing gateway D, on the E northwest corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. F This gateway should be similar to existing gateway D. The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and landscaping. This gateway is located on Historic Route 66, and should be designed to follow the G more historic style of gateway A.The design should also incorporate text and graphics identifying Historic Route 66.This gateway should match gateway Q. H This gateway should be on the north side of the street. The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and landscaping. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the northeast I corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limited, a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. J The conceptual design for this gateway is complete. These gateways will identify the City from the SR-210 off ramps. Ideally the K,L,M,N gateways would be at the intersection of the major street and each off ramp, as shown in the illustration in Figure LU-6.The gateways should be similar to existing gateway D,with placement and landscaping to match adjacent design elements. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the south side O of the street,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limited, a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. P This gateway is a small existing cobblestone and concrete gateway. This gateway is located on the Historic Route 66, and should be designed to follow Q the more historic style of gateway A.The design should also incorporate text and graphics identifying Historic Route 66.This gateway should match gateway G. This gateway should be on the south side of Arrow Highway, and similar in forms R and materials to existing gateway D.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and planting. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the northeast S corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limited, a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. This gateway should be on both sides of Vineyard Avenue, and similar in forms and T materials to existing gateway A.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and planting. Note:Descriptions are keyed to locations shown on Figure LU-6, Entry Monument Locations. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-85 it\ IM This entry monument signifies the southern entry into Rancho Cucamonga on Haven Avenue at 4tn Street. r• tt Pedestrian Connectivity Walking to local destinations is a wonderful way to get exercise, reduce short vehicle trips, and contribute to reduced pollutant emissions. The built environment and community design can influence walking behavior. Rancho Cucamonga residents look for opportunities to walk and bicycle, both to recreate and socialize. The General Plan policies respond by encouraging changes in the built environment that will increase walking. This includes building more sidewalks and trails, making the streetscape more pedestrian friendly, creating better connectivity between destinations, and increasing pedestrian safety. The City's aim is to design streets for people to use them and assume people will walk. Creating a pedestrian environment involves more than laying down a sidewalk or installing a signal. A truly viable pedestrian system involves paying attention to the smallest details, including how a commercial center provides connections to residential neighborhoods and what paving materials are used for walkways. Facilities should be accessible to all pedestrians, especially those with disabilities and children. 1 1 I Linkages:Walkways and Corridors Parking Lot Pedestrian Connections Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-86 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN The walking environment should be open and inviting, not sterile and vacant. Pedestrians need more than sidewalks adjacent to parking and crosswalks across six lanes of traffic. In addition to protecting pedestrians from motor vehicle traffic, it is important to have a secure, pleasant, and interesting walking environment to encourage people to walk. The following strategies improve the built environment for walking: ■ Move buildings toward the street and make them accessible from sidewalks. Avoid large blank walls and expansive parking areas. Create an interesting environment for pedestrians along the streets. ■ Create linkages such as walkways, corridors, and shared-use paths that connect pedestrian facilities. Linkages increase pedestrian convenience by providing short cuts to destinations. Linkages often provide travel routes that are more appealing than walking next to traffic. ■ Promote the uniform design and distribution of street furniture, information kiosks, receptacles, trees and planting boxes, and public and private signage. Work with developers to provide pedestrian amenities such as street lighting, benches, and streetscape improvements for new developments. ■ Require all new developments to provide safe and convenient pedestrian environments and access through building orientation, site layout, traffic management, and connections to transit service and local commercial and community facilities. ■ Continue to require development to provide and maintain benches and shelters at key transit locations. ■ Along major transit routes, continue to provide amenities such as continuous sidewalks, canopies, arcades, shade trees, and seating areas to improve the pedestrian environment along major commercial streets. ■ Continue to design and engineer safe and accessible roadways and pedestrian facilities. Provide adequate lighting along major pedestrian routes and trails to encourage walking in the evenings. Sidewalks, benches,trees, and trellises provide pedestrian comfort within parking areas. :h Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-87 Accessibility Accessibility for all people, including those with special needs, has always been an important commitment for Rancho Cucamonga. The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted in 1990 to ensure that people with disabilities have equal opportunities and access to public spaces as those who do not have disabilities. People with disabilities may have diminished mobility, limited vision, or reduced cognitive skills. In some instances, individuals may experience a combination of disabilities, which is more common as a person grows older. A person may experience a disability on a permanent or temporary basis. Without accessible pedestrian facilities, people with disabilities will have fewer opportunities to engage in employment, school, shopping, recreation, and other everyday activities. New or altered facilities must provide access for all pedestrians. Street designs that accommodate people with disabilities create a better walking environment for all pedestrians. Adequate time to cross streets, well-designed curb ramps, limited driveways, and sidewalks that are wide and clear of obstructions and have minimal cross-slope are examples of design features that accommodate pedestrians with disabilities, persons using strollers, and indeed, all pedestrians. Sustainable Landscaping Sustainable landscaping for the local climate requires minimal resource inputs, such as water, pesticides, and labor for maintenance. Sustainable landscaping begins with an appropriate design that includes functional, cost-efficient, visually pleasing, environmentally friendly and maintainable areas. Rancho Cucamonga's general criteria for landscaping design include the following: ■ Landscaping to enhance streetscapes and prominent entryways ■ Water-efficient landscaping principles ■ Improving water quality through landscaping ■ Landscape maintenance and protection ■ Historical landscaping and trees ■ Fire-resistive landscaping and defensible space in the High Fire Hazard r areas 1 ii - jt j No-mow landscaping Incorporating historic landscaping (vineyards) Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-88 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN �W W A Parking lot bioswales Native and drought-tolerant landscaping Enhancing Streetscapes or Entryways Implementing efficient Landscaping can help integrate the diverse elements of Rancho Cucamonga's built irrigation systems will help form. Strategic placements of mature tree specimens, color accents, and distinctive meet the requirements of plant and tree forms enhance streetscape views and project entryways. Even when AB 1881,which provides the buildings along a street seem to bear no relationship to one another, a bold guidelines for residential landscaped edge or median can unify the streetscape and create a memorable and commercial developers image. Landscaping along streets can define a particular project or edge of a regarding efficient irrigationand landscaping neighborhood, screen undesirable views, or tie into the existing landscape of the techniques. surrounding area. Water Efficiency Principles Water imported from distant sources is costly and in diminishing supply. As the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) focuses on obtaining more water from local groundwater sources, water conservation in Rancho Cucamonga becomes a higher priority. Rancho Cucamonga's attractive landscaped environment must be balanced with the ever-present need to conserve water. The City Council has adopted a Water Efficiency Ordinance that requires reduced consumption of water in landscapes through the following principles: ■ Planning and Design. Appropriate planning and design of landscaping can lead to more sustainable landscaping over the long run. It can conserve water, create beautiful and visual scenery, and create a more sustainable landscape that is good for the environment. ■ Drought-Tolerant Plant Materials. Using plants that can survive periods of time with little or no water assists in the efforts to conserve water. Lawns can be removed or reduced in size and replaced with drought-tolerant plants, which can save a significant amount of water over the year, particularly during the dry and hot summer months. Artificial turf has come a long way in design and durability, and should also be considered as an alternative. ■ Efficient Irrigation Systems. Irrigation systems can be designed to water different groupings of plant types based on water needs. Drip irrigation can be used where plants need little water. Smart irrigation systems, which employ weather sensors, can efficiently irrigate plants based on weather conditions. Systems can automatically shut off irrigation when it rains. ■ Use of Mulch. Using mulch can insulate soils and retain moisture, which helps conserve water. Mulch also suppresses weeds, minimizing landscape maintenance and labor. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-89 Improving Water Quality Landscaping can be used to improve water quality, particularly during rain storms when polluted urban runoff enters creeks and channels. Stormwater is polluted by oil and grease from roads, pesticides from lawns and agriculture, sediment from construction sites, and carelessly discarded trash. Landscaped parkways and medians, such as those found on Haven Avenue or Milliken Avenue, can be retrofitted with vegetated bioswales that include native and drought-tolerant plants. Bioswales are landscape elements designed to retain runoff and remove silt and pollution from it. Pollutants can be filtered out as water sits in the vegetated swales or is filtered by underground systems. Draining water into bioswales can also help recharge groundwater basins. Parking lot planters can also be developed with bioswales, where water can flow from asphalt surfaces and into these swales. Bioswales are a natural way to clean water and help keep a healthy earth. There are various other methods and programs available to help improve water quality. See Chapter 6: Resource Conservation for more information regarding water quality improvement initiatives. Landscape Maintenance and Protection Rancho Cucamonga undertakes design strategies to reduce operation and maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. Some of the design strategies are applied to both new development and existing landscapes, and include educating, informing, and involving the public. Many medians on major streets do not use turf, which requires continual maintenance and plenty of water to maintain a green and manicured appearance. Use of creek rocks and drought-tolerant, low-maintenance plants minimizes maintenance labor. Landscape design can be Replacing lawn Iwo used to achieve effective fire parkways with Yam.. vegetation can reduce .':.� :., protection in residential water use ands: - �_ neighborhoods bordering ` maintenance. ` � hillside and open space areas. Fuel modification — rl::. Y... :- � the manipulation or removal of fuels to lessen the potential damage of a wildland fire — reduces radiant and convective heat and provides valuable defensible space for firefighters to make an effective stand against an approaching fire front. Fuel modification zones are strategically placed as a buffer to open space or areas of natural vegetation and generally would occur surrounding the perimeter of a subdivision or isolated development of a single-unit dwelling. In high fire-hazard areas, landscape plans for private and public development must be reviewed and approved by the Fire District to ensure proper use of fire-resistant plants and adequate vegetation management zones. For further discussion and information regarding Public Safety and fire hazard areas, please see Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-90 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Historic Landscaping and Trees Historic landscaping and trees provide reminders of Rancho Cucamonga's agrarian past and highlight the importance of mature landscaping as a design component. Trees contribute to the scale and character of the environment and provide many essential functions. Trees provide cooling shade, reduce heat, provide protection from high winds, contribute to clean air, create sound barriers, support wildlife, and increase property values. Street and shade tree canopies can lower temperatures along sidewalks and encourage walking even during the hottest times of the year. Large canopy trees can shade expansive parking areas, cooling hot asphalt. Within Rancho Cucamonga, certain types of vegetation also provide a historic link to the City's agricultural past. Stands of eucalyptus tree windrows in Alta Loma and Etiwanda were planted in the late 1800s to protect crops from severe winds. Remaining vineyards and citrus trees enhance the historic rural atmosphere of the City, and are scenic and historical assets. New vineyards are being included in the landscape design of new developments, providing aesthetic and functional features; the grapes can be used for commercial wine-making. Preservation of historic agricultural landscapes is discussed in detail in the Historic Resources section of this Chapter and in Chapter 6: Resource Conservation. The plantings of new vineyards are both functional - and visually attractive,and tie back to Rancho =- Cucamonga's agricultural heritage. Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a Tree Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 19.08 of the Municipal Code) that deals specifically with trees, including heritage trees. The purpose and intent of the ordinance includes: ■ The eucalyptus, palm, oak, sycamore, pine, and other trees growing within the City are a natural aesthetic resource, which help define community character. Such trees are worthy of protection to preserve scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening, and counteract air pollution. It is pertinent to the public peace, harmony, and welfare that such trees be protected from indiscriminate cutting or removal, especially where such trees are associated with a proposal for development. ■ The ordinance establishes regulations for the preservation of heritage trees on private property to retain as many trees as possible, consistent with the purpose of this Chapter and the reasonable economic enjoyment of such property. ■ In particular, the eucalyptus windrows are a unique inheritance whose cumulative value as a windbreak system is a resource. The City aims to perpetuate a windbreak system through protection of selected blue gum Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-91 Eucalyptus windrows and expansion of the system through planting of new spotted gum eucalyptus windrows along the established grid pattern, as development occurs. View Corridors Rancho Cucamonga is rich in scenic resources. The orientation of the roadway network and elevation changes provide spectacular views of the foothills, the San Gabriel Mountains, and the San Bernardino National Forest. From the foothill area, long, open vistas to the south provide outstanding views of the City and beyond. These north-south views are particularly prominent along the straight alignments of Archibald, Haven, and Etiwanda Avenues. Additional scenic resources include the remaining stands of eucalyptus windrows, vineyards, and natural vegetation associated with flood control lands and utility corridors. Views of these resources are most prominent from the roadways and in certain locations from places of work and residences. Long-range vistas can be preserved and framed within a development project, as well as along roadways. However, mountain backdrops cannot be viewed or appreciated if screened by buildings or scarred by poor hillside development. View corridors within Rancho Cucamonga can be carelessly diminished or destroyed by the indiscriminate placement of communication towers, advertising signs, buildings, tall trees, or other human-built features. The design policies for maintaining view corridors are meant to be combined with policies on landscaping and Special Boulevards to create scenic corridors and attractive travel ways that will orient travelers and enhance foreground and distant views. View of Cucamonga Peak from Milliken Avenue. Public Art Public art refers to works of art in any media located in a public setting, with the purpose of beautifying public spaces and buildings, drawing attention to the message the artwork may communicate, and educating the public. Public art can increase the intrinsic and monetary values of the places it graces; it can express a civic and corporate pride. A city with public art is a city that thinks, feels, and grows. An existing art installation in Rancho Cucamonga is the piece located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, at the entry plaza of the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center. Public art takes many forms, including Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-92 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN statues, sculptures, lighting effects, street furniture, paving, railings, signs, fountains, wall murals, and reliefs. Many cities allot funding to public art. Some employ public art programs, where a certain percentage of building costs (often one percent) has to be used to create public art. Public art at the Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard plaza entrance to the Terra Vista Town r Center. TFRRA VISTA TOWN c Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Mural Program The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Mural Program, led by the Redevelopment Agency, has been designed to enhance economic opportunities for businesses along Foothill Boulevard, and to encourage additional investment in properties along the City's primary retail/commercial thoroughfare. The mural program will help create an aesthetically pleasing environment for residents and visitors, and may also provide economic benefits for merchants through increased interest and activity along Foothill Boulevard. In addition to the economic benefits, the program will create cultural, educational, and artistic value, providing residents and visitors the opportunity to connect with the rich history of the Rancho Cucamonga community through a series of colorful visual displays. Signs The City recognizes the need for signs as a means for business advertising and identification. One characteristic that distinguishes Rancho Cucamonga from other communities in the area is its sensitivity to sign design and insistence on attractive signage. The City aims to maintain a visually attractive community through high- quality site planning, building designs, landscaping, and signs. Well-designed signs are not only pleasing in appearance, but can enhance the economic value and accessibility of a project. The Sign Ordinance contains a reasonable system of controls and provides incentives and flexibility for variety and good design. The objectives of the Sign Ordinance are to: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-93 ■ Provide public convenience by directing persons to various activities and enterprises ■ Ensure the development of a high-quality environment by providing a reasonable system of controls for signs ■ Encourage signs that are well designed and pleasing in appearance and to provide incentive and latitude for variety, good design relationship, and spacing ■ Encourage a desirable urban character that has a minimum of overhead clutter ■ Enhance the economic value of the community and each area thereof through the regulation of such things as size, number, location, design, and illumination of signs ■ Encourage signs that are compatible with adjacent land uses ■ Reduce possible traffic and safety hazards through good signing ■ Protect the general public health, safety, and welfare of the community Larger-scale multi-tenant projects require a Uniform Sign Program to establish standard designs and technical signage criteria. These criteria are applied uniformly to create coordinated yet distinct signage for businesses within a single development. Standards are developed through coordination of City staff and the property owner/developer to ensure that a project retains a quality visual environment. The adoption of Uniform Sign Programs allows places such as shopping centers, office parks, and multi-tenant developments to communicate to tenants the expectations for quality signage. Art murals on the Barton Plaza building at Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue and on the Lowe's building I at Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue ' reflect Rancho Cucamonga's heritage. i rr - f - r - Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-94 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Community Design Issues Key issues relative to land use are: • Pattern and Scale of Development. The integration of various neighborhoods, districts, and urban centers into a coherent City structure and image will continue to be important as the City fills in. The design of connectors or retrofits of existing neighborhoods built independent of each other, new infill projects, or even brand new development will have to be considered to balance integration, yet preserve a neighborhood character within the City as a whole. • High-Quality Design Standards. Design standards must uphold the high quality Rancho Cucamonga demands, but must be flexible enough and contain enough options so as not to prevent desirable development from locating in the City. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-95 Community Design Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are aimed at providing guidance and policy direction regarding community design in Rancho Cucamonga. GOAL LU-9: Faster a cohesive, healthy community through appropriate patterns and scales of development, including complementary transitions between districts, neighborhoods, and land uses. Policy 1.11-9.1: Preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing districts and neighborhoods through focused attention on land use, community design, and economic development. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga has distinguishable districts and neighborhoods that either evolved historically around agriculture, have been more recently master planned, or have been encouraged to develop as a concentration of uses such as the industrial area of the City. The City's intent is to maintain the integrity of these districts or neighborhoods as they continue to age over time. Therefore, the City seeks compatible infill development or redevelopment where necessary, preservation of historic resources, implementation of a streetscape design that reinforces the established image or theme, and focused attention on the economic viability and sustainability of these districts and neighborhoods. Policy 1-11-9.2: Integrate districts and neighborhoods into the overall City structure and image. Discussion: Programs that seek to enhance the identity of individual neighborhoods or districts must be balanced with the need to establish a coherent City structure and image. Methods to provide this integration include the use of clear linkage systems such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, open space corridors, and landscaping that is compatible in form and color. Adherence to the overall General Design Principles will also result in the quality design that is a hallmark of Rancho Cucamonga. Policy 1-1.1-9.1 As the City revitalizes areas through redevelopment and earth infill development, provide a transition between the developed and natural (unbuilt) environment through landscaping techniques, open space linkages, preservation of landforms, sensitive site planning, architectural design, and public art. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-96 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: New development within Rancho Cucamonga's foothill areas or rural areas such as Etiwanda should utilize a variety of design techniques to create a project that blends with the surrounding environment, while maintaining a balance with fire-safe landscape design. Techniques such as the preservation of mature trees onsite, the use of native plant materials, development of linear buffer parks or the incorporation of special vegetation such as vineyards or groves within the project design can create a more harmonious setting for new development. In addition, sensitive grading techniques and the preservation of landforms in hillside development can minimize the visual impact of development in predominately open space areas. Project site planning should consider visual impacts to surrounding open space areas or distant views from roadways and should incorporate features of the natural environment through the design and landscaping of open space areas and corridors. Landscape setbacks adjacent to permanent open space areas should be sufficient in distance and landscape design to provide fire protection, defensible space, and a transition between the natural and built environment. The overall intent is to provide a more harmonious transition between development and the surrounding natural environment, as well as adhering to fire-safe landscape principles. Policy LU-9.4; Ensure that infill development is sensitive and compatible with the design and scale of all adjacent historic properties. Discussion: Every act of construction is an opportunity to repair, enhance, or embellish a district. The best way is to create infill development that is sensitive to and inspired by the existing conditions. This includes materials, scale, and massing. Policy LU-9.5: Establish Mixed Use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place" that emanates from the architectural and landscape design. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga has a well-established pattern of suburban and rural development. The City has the opportunity to enhance this pattern with the development of more urbanized centers of activity within suitable locations. This General Plan provides detailed land use and design guidance for each of the Mixed Use areas, which are envisioned as concentrations of activity at carefully selected locations within the City. Policy LllAR Maintain the rural development pattern and character of the Etiwanda area through the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Discussion: Etiwanda is recognized as a special rural town established in 1883 by George and William Chaffey for agricultural production. Rancho Cucamonga has adopted the Etiwanda Specific Plan to further enhance and preserve the remaining rural characteristics of the area through land use, density/intensity of development, streetscape design, preservation of significant vegetation, and detailed design guidelines. The Etiwanda Specific Plan is the primary tool for implementing this policy and will be upheld through the project design, review, and approval process. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-97 GOAL LU-10: Encourage sustainable landscaping and streetscape design. Policy 1-1.1-10.1: Continue to require implementation of the City's Water earth Efficiency Ordinance, which should be reviewed and updated periodically. Discussion: The Water Efficiency Ordinance establishes a water conservation plan to reduce water consumption in the landscape environment using water-efficient landscaping principles. Policy 1-1.1-102 Encourage the planting of edible landscapes, using citrus Earth trees, box gardens, vineyards, and other edible plant materials whenever possible. Body` Edible landscaping is the process of planting edible plants in spaces other than in a traditional garden. Edible landscapes save space as they combine landscaping and food-growing into a single space. It is a very sustainable method of landscaping that refers back to Rancho Cucamonga's beginnings as an agrarian community. Converting power line utility corridors to this use can promote and preserve the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga while significantly reducing the fire hazards presented by these uninterrupted rights of way. Utility corridors and the invasive grasses that they support have a high potential for transporting hillside wildfires into the residential and urban areas of the City. Policy LU-10.3: Promote low water usage, and emphasize fire-safe defensible space. Discussion: With water a limited resource and wild fires a constant threat, the use of drought tolerant or fire resistant plant material can make a big difference. Policy 1-1.1-10A Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs No for commercial frontages that create vibrant places which Body support walking, bicycling, transit, and sustainable economic development. Discussion: The design of streetscapes can create walkable environments that support walking, bicycling, and transit as well as supporting new and existing commercial development. Policy LU-10.5: Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad right-of-way. Discussion: Metrolink service along the Santa Fe Railway is an important transportation resource within Rancho Cucamonga. Landscaping along this travel route and around the Metrolink station should convey an aesthetically pleasing image, while providing desired screening or framing of particular views. The City will pursue the planning and installation of a landscape design that will create a pleasant travel experience for all passengers traveling to or through the community. Policy 1-1.1-10.E: Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-term operation and maintenance costs within the City's Landscape earth Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-98 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: Reducing landscape maintenance along the City's street medians and corridors saves maintenance labor costs, water, and energy, creating a more sustainable environment. Where possible, turf areas and lawns should be removed from streetscapes and replaced with low-maintenance, drought-tolerant plantings and natural hardscape materials. Continue to implement "smart" landscape watering systems in medians. GOAL LU-11: Ensure that community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulations. Policy Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City. Discussion: The objectives of the existing Sign Ordinance include: efficiently directing people to various locations; ensuring a high-quality visual environment; requiring signs that are well designed and placed, and are pleasing in appearance; minimizing overhead clutter; enhancing economic value of properties; promoting signs that are compatible with adjacent uses; reducing possible traffic and safety hazards through good sign design; and protecting the general health and welfare of the community. Policy LU-11.2; Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures. Discussion: Undergrounding utilities can remove visual clutter and can eliminate wind-related power outages. Utility wire undergrounding and relocation projects, however, are expensive and residential neighborhoods must work with the City and utility providers before committing to such a task. Policy LU-11.3: Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment. Discussion: Communication towers can be designed to blend with the surrounding environment to increase aesthetics and reduce visual clutter. The towers can also be retrofitted to look like trees or concealed in windmills and other similar features. They can also be located on buildings or other tall features. These installations are generally referred to as concealed cell sites or stealth cell sites. GOAL LU-12: Faster a variety of travel routes that are enjoyable ways to experience Rancho Cucamonga. Policy LU-12.1: Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-99 Discussion: The Community Design section of the General Plan establishes Special Boulevards within Rancho Cucamonga for which the landscape/hardscape design, trails, and setback standards shall be master planned and consistently applied throughout the length of the Special Boulevard segment or route. The application of special paving materials, plant materials, lighting, signing, and siting of structures at key intersections shall also be incorporated in Special Boulevard designs. Many of the streetscapes for Special Boulevards have been conceptually designed and adopted through specific plans and planned community projects, followed by the preparation of more detailed Beautification Master Plans. Streetscape design for all other roadways should adhere to the basic principles of creating a strong landscape edge and providing a high-quality, consistent appearance. The City expects all streetscape designs to incorporate water efficiency principles and design strategies for publicly landscaped areas. Policy Lu-12.2: Require the design of transit stops to be compatible with -Earth adjacent development and provide for adequate seating, signage, shade, and refuse receptacles. Discussion: Most transit stops in Rancho Cucamonga are built as a condition of approval for an adjacent project. The City expects transit stops to be designed as an "extension" of a developer's project and seek individual design solutions that are compatible with adjacent development in terms of shelter/shading design, seating, and other user amenities. The City also expects convenient, well- designated pedestrian paths linking the transit stop to adjacent uses. Policy 1-1.1-12.1 Support development projects that are designed to facilitate ��r convenient access for pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and Body automobiles. Discussion: Development should include access for pedestrians, bicycles, and transit, as well as automobiles. Focus should be placed on creating a more pedestrian-friendly environment that encourages both walking and bicycling. Policy 1-1.1-12A Retrofit, where feasible, existing neighborhoods to allow for -Earth convenient, multi-modal access to schools, parks, and shopping centers. Bo d`jjr Discussion: Current design standards call for a high level of connectivity for alternative modes of transportation (bicycles, walking, equestrian, etc.) to destinations. Older developments were not held to these same standards. Over time, the retrofit of these neighborhoods and districts will add to the public realm and encourage alternate ways of getting around. GOAL Lu-13: Take full advantage of view lines and vista paints with carefully designed development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-100 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Policy LU-13.1: On north-south roadways, open space corridors, and other locations where there are views of scenic resources, trees, and structures, encourage framing and orientation of such views at key locations, and endeavor to keep obstruction of views to a minimum. Discussion: Scenic resources include the San Gabriel mountains and foothills, long vistas of the City from hillside areas, and other views of special vegetation or permanent open space lands. Project-level site planning, landscape design, placement of signs, and other human-made features must consider the impacts upon views from roadways and through a project site to the foothills, valley vistas, or other scenic resources. The City's desire is to see the "framing" of views through new development, not obstruction. This may be accomplished through the clustering of trees or structures, selection of landscape materials, or the building orientation and footprint. GOAL LU-14: Support public art as an important amenity of a beautiful City. Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations �l f Policy LU-14.1: particularly along major travel corridors. Mind Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the value of including public art within development sites and within public rights-of-way to enhance the quality of a project and the image of the community. The City will continue to require art as a condition of approval for projects at key locations and will continue to seek funding to provide public art within public rights-of-way, including the Metrolink corridor. Policy LU-14.2: Continue to promote the establishment of entry monumentation as a means of identifying communities, districts, and neighborhoods. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga developed plans for gateways to enhance the impressions of the City at the points of entry. These plans include both identification of monument locations and conceptual designs for different types of gateways. A number of the gateways have been constructed and successfully beautify the entries into the City. Since that time, SR-210 and Day Creek Boulevard have been added to the City's street system. As part of this General Plan Update, the City has augmented the number of entry gateways to reflect entrances produced by the new routes. Incorporate a public art ordinance in the Development Code. Policy LU-14.3: `. . Mind Discussion: Developing a public art ordinance program would help spur additional public art pieces throughout the City with the intent of promoting a rich, diverse, and stimulating cultural environment. In preparing such an ordinance, the City must prepare proper guidelines and regulations for setting up the program. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-101 Historic Resources As Rancho Cucamonga developed out of expansive swaths of vineyard and citrus groves into residential neighborhoods and industrial and commercial centers, some of the City's long-standing historical buildings have been torn down. Other structures have been lost to disrepair, neglect, redevelopment, and fire. Recognizing that economic prosperity and growth can sometimes overrun the historic fabric of the community, historic preservation groups and the City have made efforts to protect the historical buildings and landmarks that remain. The General Plan reinforces this commitment to recognizing, protecting, and maintaining Rancho Cucamonga's past. Rancho Cucamonga History The following narrative provides a glimpse into Rancho Cucamonga's past. Understanding the past and how the City has transformed over the years leads to understanding of the importance of protecting and maintaining many of the City's historic buildings. The Beginnings of Our Community Early History Originally inhabited by Native Americans, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a center of land development opportunity since Franciscan priests and Spanish soldiers entered and began their occupation of the area in the late eighteenth century. The name "Cucamonga," a Shoshone word for "sandy place," first appeared in a written record of the San Gabriel Mission dated 1811. Development of the three towns of Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda began in the late 1870s and 1880s as a direct result of acquisition and distribution of land and water and the availability of rail transit through the region. In the 1930s a fourth distinct neighborhood, Northtown, developed along the Santa Fe Railroad. Etiwanda The first European settlers came to the Etiwanda Colony, located in the eastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga, in the early 1860s. Having made his fortune in the California gold mines, Captain Joseph S. Garcia (1823-1902) of the Azores Islands (located off the coast of Lisbon, Portugal), purchased a large amount of land in the Cucamonga Valley and in 1881, sold off much of the land comprising Etiwanda-560 acres—to brothers George and William Chaffey for $30,000. This purchase included Garcia's house and the water rights to local water sources, including Day Canyon and a creek to the east. The Chaffeys made other land purchases in the Etiwanda area over time, eventually creating a tract of over 7,500 acres. They named the colony"Etiwanda" after an Indian chief who had been a friend of their uncle. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-102 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Cultivating the sandy soil in an Etiwanda vineyard, 1929. P N. Cucamonga In 1870, Jewish immigrant Isaias Hellman, a prominent Los Angeles businessman and one of the original 23 founders of the Farmers and Merchants Bank in downtown Los Angeles, along with several of his associates, came into ownership of the Rancho Cucamonga at a cost of approximately $50,000. They immediately sold a small amount of the land, turning a quick profit, and kept the remaining 8,000 acres. Under a newly formed partnership, Cucamonga Company (later Cucamonga Vineyard Company) and Hellman and his associates subdivided the residual acreage, planted it with a variety of crops, and oversaw restoration of the local vineyards, resulting in the Cucamonga Valley becoming the biggest winemaking area in California. Some Cucamonga Company lands were sold, ultimately comprising portions of Alta Loma and Etiwanda. A dramatic effort was undertaken, tunneling horizontally into Cucamonga Canyon in the San Gabriel Mountains to the north with a primary labor force of local Chinese immigrants, to access water from natural springs in the mountains. Water was delivered to Cucamonga in 1887. _ Cucamonga Winery, built in 1835, is said to be California's oldest winery (photo taken in 1939). .,,# r s' Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-103 Alta Loma In 1880, Pasadena-based horticultural land developer Adolph Petsch and a group of associates purchased 160 acres of land in northern Alta Loma, naming the land Hermosa. They also purchased the water rights to nearby Deer and Adler Canyons and formed the Hermosa Land and Water Company in 1881. In 1883, they purchased more land in present-day Alta Loma, establishing the "Iowa Tract" on 500 acres. The Iowa Tract was joined with Hermosa in 1887, and the entire area was renamed loamosa. The Hermosa Land and Water Company was incorporated in the same year to handle the consolidated land holdings which amounted to over 700 acres. Petsch and the Hermosa Land and Water Company were able to sell lands quickly because of their ability to supply each parcel with a dependable supply of water, using a method of irrigation similar to that which was being used in Etiwanda. The Alta Loma area produced high quantities of citrus fruits, including lemons, oranges, and grapefruit beginning in the 1880s, and continued to grow citrus on a large scale for the next 60 years. loamosa was renamed Alta Loma when colonists determined that a new town should be built along the incoming Pacific Electric Railway in 1913. Northtown The Northtown neighborhood, named for its position to the township of Guasti to the south, is a historically Latino community that began along the Santa Fe Railway in the 1930s when Mexican immigrants began moving to the region looking for work during the Great Depression, eagerly answering the demand for agricultural laborers to pick grapes, maintain vineyards, and harvest and pack citrus. Located south of the original town center development of Cucamonga, Northtown comprises approximately a square mile roughly bounded by the Santa Fe Railway to the south, Feron Boulevard to the north, Archibald Avenue to the west and Haven Avenue to the east. The community was, for a time, a distinctly defined land area surrounded by vineyards, orchards, and empty fields on all sides. In the early 1900s, several other Latino neighborhoods were located throughout the City, including a neighborhood on Monte Vista Street in Alta Loma and one on Base Line Road in Etiwanda, where 1-15 now passes through the City. Mexican immigrants also lived in Guasti, a self- contained wine company town located south of Northtown (currently in the neighboring City of Ontario). The 1930s-era worker housing in Northtown tended to be small in size, containing only one or two bedrooms, one outhouse, and sometimes a garage or additional outbuilding. Northtown was connected to Cucamonga by commercial development along Archibald Avenue. Railroads and Early Town Development (1887.1945) Construction of railroads through the Cucamonga Valley allowed for tremendous growth of the local agriculture industry, the success of land sales, and subsequent development of the towns of Cucamonga (including the Northtown neighborhood), Alta Loma, and Etiwanda. Similar to other Southern California boomtowns, construction of railroads through the region created a rapid increase in local development, enabling both people and goods to move in and out of Rancho Cucamonga at an unprecedented speed, which dramatically increased agricultural production and sales. From the early 1900s to the 1950s, the northern portion of the City's landscape consisted of mostly citrus groves, while the southern portion was dominated by vineyards. The San Bernardino Line of the Pacific Electric Railway, with stations in Claremont, Upland, Alta Loma, Etiwanda, Fontana, and Rialto, was the Pacific Electric's longest line. It was completed through Rancho Cucamonga via stations at Alta Loma and Etiwanda in July 1914, offering competition to the older Santa Fe Railway to the south. Initially the Pacific Electric Railway was mostly used to transport citrus, although it carried a variety of freight. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-104 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Pacific Electric Railway r� Etiwanda Station, 1950. - S �7 Los AM6CLE5 � . } bug Winemaking (1858.1970) Granted the 13,000-acre Rancho Cucamonga in 1839, Tiburcio Tapia planted a small vineyard from vine clippings likely obtained from the neighboring San Gabriel Mission, established by Franciscan priests in 1771, and also formed a small-scale winery. Tapia's original vineyard passed through the hands of several individuals before being sold to John Rains in 1858, who added greatly to the original vineyard, doubling it in size. As a result of this effort, Cucamonga became the most important business point between San Bernardino and Los Angeles, and shortly thereafter, the wines produced here became known far and wide. Following Rains' death, the vineyard was taken over by Pierre and Jean Louis Sansevain, who also improved the vineyards, but the vineyards were later destroyed, falling victimto locust infestation. View of the Cucamonga { Valley, home to numerous acres of vineyards in 1942. R s. , Despite the loss of Tapia's original vineyard, the winemaking industry continued to develop and flourish in the Cucamonga Valley, moving from modestly sized wine making operations to larger-scale wine production facilities. Secondo Guasti's Italian Vineyard Company, established in 1883, was among the first production-oriented Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-105 wine-making companies in the region, covering over 5,000 acres with wine-producing grapes by the early 1900s. By comparison, the entire Cucamonga Valley contained over 16,000 acres of wine grapes by 1919. In 1919, the 181" Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed, establishing nation-wide prohibition of the sale, manufacturing, or transportation of alcoholic beverages. It lasted approximately 15 years and had a pronounced effect on the local wine-making industry. While many wineries were forced to close down operations, others conceived of creative ways to keep their businesses open despite Prohibition. Some wineries continued to harvest grapes, using their facilities to produce a variety of products, including table grapes, grape juice, grape and wine jellies, and beef and liver additives. As taking wine with meals was an important custom for Italian immigrants, home winemaking was allowed at a maximum quantity of 200 gallons per year for family use. Despite hardships placed on grape growers during the Prohibition era, the amount of land used for vineyards continued to grow in the Cucamonga region, increasing from 16,000 acres in 1919 to 21,000 acres in 1930. Prohibition was repealed in December of 1933, and many United States wineries restarted their operations. During this time, the wine-making industry largely shifted from small- to large-scale production. To compete with large-scale wineries, small- scale wineries joined with one another to form cooperatives such as the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association (formed 1934); members would pool their fruit and share revenue on a percentage basis determined by the quantity of fruit contributed by each grower. Improvements in the handling and transportation of wine grapes that came about upon the repeal of Prohibition also facilitated recovery and success of the winemaking industry in the Cucamonga Valley, which continued to flourish until the early 1950s. The postwar alteration of Cucamonga Valley's rural landscape began in 1947 with construction of Henry J. Kaiser's large steel mill in Fontana. Then, in 1951, the City of Ontario removed a vineyard purchased 11 years earlier for expansion of its airport; Ontario continued to acquire more vineyards as the airport grew. Meanwhile, tastes in wine were changing, and sweet wines traditionally produced in the Cucamonga Valley were losing market share to drier varietal wines produced in Northern California. Bad weather conditions in the early 1950s led to poor harvests. Suburban sprawl sent real estate prices and property taxes soaring, and increased air pollution adversely affected agriculture. In 1950, 20 wineries were operating in the Rancho Cucamonga area. By 1970, only five remained. Route 66 (1926-1970) Completed in the late 1930s, United States Highway 66 (Route 66) resulted from a nation-wide effort to create a highway linking small towns and larger cities from Chicago to Los Angeles. In Rancho Cucamonga, Route 66 is Foothill Boulevard running east-west through the City. Several historic resources potentially significant for their association with Route 66 remain. Aided by the financial backing and large- scale organization of the Federal Aid Road Act of 1916 and the Federal Highway Act of 1921, Route 66 (also referred to as The Mother Road)was commissioned in 1926. Nationwide prosperity following World War II afforded many people the opportunity to travel for leisure. Automobile excursions west on Route 66 quickly evolved into a cultural phenomenon, attracting a multitude of tourists anxious to see the West and visit the interesting roadside businesses that had sprung up alongside Route 66. These roadside attractions appealed to the tourist market with an array of food and refreshment options, trading posts, references to Native American culture, and more obscure sources of entertainment, such as snake pits, petting zoos, and exotic carnival games. The popularity of Route 66 indirectly led to its demise and ultimately Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-106 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN to its decommissioning in 1985. Experiencing heavy traffic by tourists and by the trucking industry, Route 66 became crowded and fell into disrepair. In addition, beginning in the 1950s, modern highways and interstate systems were built throughout the nation, often bypassing small towns that had grown dependent on Route 66 travelers for business. Despite the dramatic decline in traffic, some Route 66 businesses endured, developing a cult following of travelers anxious to experience the mystic Route 66 as it once was. Foothill Boulevard(Historic y Route 66), 1962. 1P. Was. -- Postwar Development (1945.1977) Following World War II in 1945, Rancho Cucamonga's landscape began to shift from a rural to suburban environment, reflecting the nation-wide trend toward decentralization of the city. Driven by rapid highway construction, increasing automobile ownership, availability of modern building technologies, and the Baby Boom, the postwar period brought about an increase in housing demand and rising land values, spawning development of tract housing and light industry in Rancho Cucamonga. The area that is now Rancho Cucamonga (not yet incorporated and under the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County) became a sprawling suburb during this time, with neighborhood-scale shopping centers and office parks and proliferating surface parking. As lands once occupied by agricultural uses were needed to accommodate this new pattern of development, the citrus groves and vineyards that had once characterized the local landscape eventually gave way almost entirely to suburbanization. Consolidation and Incorporation (1977) Encouraged by the initial boom in land values and development, Rancho Cucamonga activists began discussing the possibility of incorporating the three towns of Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda as early as 1887. Despite attempts at consolidation over the years, it was not until many decades later that this dream was realized. The City of Rancho Cucamonga was finally incorporated in 1977, consolidating Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda into one municipality, reaching a milestone sought after by local residents for nearly 100 years. Incorporation halted the uncontrolled growth that had been occurring in the area and provided numerous other benefits, including increased recreational opportunities and park development, improvements to existing neighborhoods, construction of new neighborhoods, and advances in local economic development. The three historic towns became part of the larger whole, providing opportunities for growth and improvement but also absorbing the character of each town center. As a result, the City now has the Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-107 opportunity to plan for the benefit of the City at-large while also continuing to recognize the historic communities from which it came. Preservation Framework The following programs are incentives that have been used to preserve and recognize local historic resources. Federal and State Programs National Historic Preservation Act To be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, the quality or significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or cultural achievement must be present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and possess one of the following: ■ The project is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of American history. ■ The project is associated with the lives of persons significant in the past. ■ The project embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. ■ The project has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The Casa de Rancho Cucamonga (Rains House Museum) at 8810 Hemlock is the only building in Rancho Cucamonga on the National Register of Historic Places, as of 2009. California Register of Historical Resources The California Register of Historical Resources program is designed to allow State and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify, evaluate, register, and protect historical resources. It is also an authoritative guide to the State's significant historical and archeological resources. The California Register of Historical Resources includes buildings, structures, objects, sites, and districts significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. As of 2009, five properties were listed in the California Register, including: ■ Padre/Biane Winery, 9951 8t" Street(1909) ■ Ernst Mueller House, 6563 East Avenue (date unknown) ■ James G. Isle House, 6490 Etiwanda Avenue (date unknown; moved to 7086 Etiwanda Avenue) ■ Herbert Goerlitz House, 6558 Hermosa/9893 Highland Avenue (1926; moved to 6558 Hermosa Avenue) ■ John Rains House, 7869 Vineyard Ave (1859; currently at 8810 Hemlock Street) Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-108 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN In addition, there are two California Historical Landmarks and six California Points of Historical Interest in Rancho Cucamonga.' California Historical Landmarks: ■ Cucamonga Rancho Winery/Thomas Vineyards, 8916 Foothill Boulevard (1839) (California Historical Landmark No. 490) ■ Site of Tapia Adobe, top of Red Hill, approximately 8501 Red Hill Country Club Drive (1839; California Historical Landmark No. 360), demolished. Note: Property is also a local Designated Point of Interest (DPI). California Points of Historical Interest: ■ Base Line Road, Highway from Highland to Claremont(1853; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-012) ■ Cucamonga Chinatown Site, 9591 San Bernardino Road (1920; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-077) ■ Christmas House, 9240 Archibald Avenue (1904; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-073) ■ Garcia Ranch House (currently the Chaffey-Garcia House), 7150 Etiwanda Avenue (1874; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-082) ■ Sycamore Inn (historically Uncle Billy's Tavern), 8318 Foothill Boulevard (1848; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-070) ■ Milliken Ranch, 8798 Haven Avenue (1891; point of Historical Interest No. SBR-075) Mills Act In 1972, California State senator James Mills introduced a bill known as the Mills Act to grant property tax relief to owners of qualified historic properties. The Mills Act is a preservation tool created by the California legislature to encourage the preservation and restoration of historic properties. The Act enables cities to enter into historical property agreements with owners of qualifying properties; these agreements will result in reductions to the owner's property taxes. The agreements provide a benefit to cities in that they ensure preservation and guarantee authentic rehabilitations and a high level of maintenance of cultural resources important to communities. Local Programs In 1978, the City adopted the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance to "designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those historic structures and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga." The Ordinance established a Historic Preservation Commission to review applications for Landmark designation, review plans for physical alterations or change of use to Landmarks, and maintain the register of Landmarks. Pursuant to the Ordinance, a Landmark Designation Program was established. An important element of the program is the identification of benefits and incentives to encourage participation. The City has designated many Landmarks and Points of Interest within Rancho Cucamonga and the Sphere of Influence. Each is photographed and described in the Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest booklet, prepared by the Community Development Department (see Figure LU-8: Historic Resources). 1 The State no longer designates Historical Landmarks or Points of Historical Interest. Properties previously designated as such must be reevaluated to be included in the California Register and may not constitute historical resources for purposes of evaluation under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-109 Participation in the Landmark Designation Program provides the following benefits: ■ Qualifies buildings to use the flexible Historical Building Code ■ Qualifies the owners to apply for use of the Mills Act contract for lower property taxes ■ Enables owners to receive free information about rehabilitation ■ Fosters civic pride and encourages additional historical research ■ Allows qualified owners to participate in the City's Landmark Plaque Program Historic Districts and Neighborhood Character Areas In an effort to recognize historic communities in Rancho Cucamonga and groupings of historic resources and places of interest, the General Plan recommends evaluating the potential creation of historic districts and/or neighborhood character areas. A historic district is a definable unified geographic entity that possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development. It can be distinguished from surrounding properties and presents the same constraints and opportunities as individually listed properties. Historic districts can be designated at the national, State, and local level. Each level of designation has its own specific criteria, although the California Register and most local inventories base their designation criteria on those contained in the National Register. In addition, each level of designation entails a different level of protection, triggers different levels of review, and makes the property potentially eligible for various preservation incentives. A neighborhood character area, also commonly referred to as a conservation district, is a tool used to define a group of significant historic resources that do not retain adequate integrity to qualify as a historic district but still maintain important levels of cultural, historic, or architectural significance. The focus of a neighborhood character area is on maintaining basic community character of an area, but not necessarily specific historic details of buildings or landscapes. Neighborhood character areas are designated as a zoning overlay geographically over a neighborhood and may be coupled with other regulations. Conceptually, a neighborhood character area creates "buffer zones"to transition from historic districts to surrounding development. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-110 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Figure LU-8: Historic Resources Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-111 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-112 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Key Historic Preservation Issues Key issues relative to historic preservation are: ■ Loss of Historic Buildings. Historic resources in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are growing increasingly rare, highlighting the opportunity to continue developing a comprehensive preservation program implemented by a historic preservation ordinance, regularly updating a local historic resource survey and inventory of historic resources, and maintaining a local register of historic resources. By updating the Historic Preservation Ordinance to be consistent with State and Federal preservation standards and maintain a local register of historic resources, greater protection and community awareness of historic resources will be achieved. Existing historic resource survey efforts, local inventory of historic resources, and local registry of historic resources needs to be clearly identified, distinguished from one another, and updated overtime. ■ Lack of Preservation Incentives. The variety of available preservation incentives should be consolidated into one program to increase awareness and streamline use of available incentives. The City currently utilizes the Mills Act and should expand it to create an incentive program that includes a variety of available incentives for properties listed in the local register. ■ Loss of Cultural Landscapes. Agriculture was the leading industry responsible for development of Rancho Cucamonga beginning in the late 1880s, made possible by the acquisition and distribution of water to Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda, and the availability of rail transit through the three communities. As such, important cultural landscape features in Rancho Cucamonga include but are not limited to vineyards, citrus groves, windbreaks, resources related to water acquisition and distribution, railway rights-of-way, and uniquely designed curbs and gutters. ■ Loss of Historic Town Center Identity. Rancho Cucamonga existed as three distinct towns until the City incorporated in 1977. However, the unique identities of the historic towns of Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda have become difficult to discern, and are increasingly threatened as historic buildings are altered or demolished and cultural landscapes vanish, diminishing a historic sense of place within each community. The City should identify and retain character in these historic centers to the maximum extent feasible. In accordance with General Plan policy that approves the creation of specific plans for identified areas in the City, specific plans have been prepared for Etiwanda (adopted 1983), Etiwanda North (adopted 1992), and Foothill Boulevard (adopted 2002). The creation of specific plans for Alta Loma and Cucamonga should become priorities. ■ Preservation of Post-World War II Historic Resources. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is home to post-World War II buildings and tract housing developments that have recently become old enough and/or developed sufficient significance to be considered historic resources. As the age threshold for determining whether or not a property is "historic" is typically 45 to 50 years, early tract housing is beginning to present itself as a potential historic resource. Buildings may be individually eligible for the local register or may qualify for eligibility only as an intact grouping (tract). This topic warrants further research in Rancho Cucamonga, as the City is home to some of the earliest tract housing development in the Inland Empire. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-113 ■ Interpretation of Historic Resources. Interpretation of historic resources refers to the way in which historic buildings, objects, and sites are identified and communicated to the public. An effective interpretation program helps preserve a sense of local history and enhances opportunities for cultural heritage tourism. ■ Lack of Resources for Educating Residents about Identifying and Caring for Historic Properties. Property owners often alter historic properties in a manner that causes significant loss of architectural integrity, rendering potential historic resources ineligible for inclusion in the local inventory, register and/or historic district. Likewise, City employees charged with preservation program implementation and code enforcement often do not have sufficient training in dealing with historic resources to adequately address historic preservation. The City's Library does not have a preservation resource center but does have a small local history collection of books. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-114 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Historic Preservation Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are aimed at providing guidance and policy direction regarding historic resources in Rancho Cucamonga. The goals and policies allow for the continued protection, preservation, maintenance, recognition, and documentation of historic resources so that future Rancho Cucamonga residents can enjoy what many residents value today. GOAL LU-15: Maintain a local historic resource survey, local inventory of historic resources, and local register of historic resources. Policy LU-15.1: Regularly update the City's historic context statement, historic resource survey, and the inventory of historic resources. Discussion: The historic context statement will be updated regularly. Exclusion from this document will not preclude a finding of significance for any resource. The City should identify and thoroughly document historic resources throughout the City by conducting research, historic evaluation, and documentation using accepted methodology and standards of the profession. The City will perform an intensive, comprehensive survey of all historic resources Citywide to the maximum extent feasible, prioritizing survey of areas of importance identified in previous surveys. Existing City status codes will be changed to be consistent with California Register Historical Resource Status Codes. Regularly updating the City's historic resource survey creates an opportunity for regularly updating the local inventory of historic resources. The inventory will, along with the survey, be updated regularly. To distinguish the inventory from the local register of historic resources, the City will formally adopt the name, "Rancho Cucamonga Inventory of Historic Resources" to describe buildings, structures, objects, sites, and districts surveyed and found to meet eligibility criteria established by the City and aligned with the California Register. Existing City status codes will be changed to be consistent with the California Register Historical Resource Status Codes. Properties listed in the National or California Registers will be considered for automatic listing in the inventory. Policy 1-1.1-15.2: Identify funding sources to support regularly updating the historic context statement and historic resource survey. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-115 Discussion: There are many approaches toward identifying a stable funding source for preservation activities. For example, the City could assume the majority of the cost of maintaining a current context statement and survey by including in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance a requirement for the City to periodically update and supplement its historic resource survey. Alternatively, property owners could be made primarily responsible for the cost. For example, the demolition review process could be amended to provide for review of proposed demolition of properties in general over 45 years of age. Findings from these demolition reviews could then be used by the City to supplement the existing historic resources inventory. In addition, the City could consider charging a nominal fee on all permits in order to help maintain a Citywide historic resource survey. Policy LU-15.3: Continue to encourage listing local historic resources in the California and National Registers. Discussion: By pursuing designation of eligible resources identified in the local inventory of historic resources for National or California Register listing, increased protection will be provided. Policy 1-1-1-15A Define local register of historic resources. Discussion: The local register of historic resources contains the inventory of historic resources, as well as resources otherwise identified to be historically significant and is officially adopted by the City Historic Preservation Commission. The City will officially establish "local landmarks" included in the list as the local register of historic resources. Historic resources currently designated will form the core of the register; properties listed as "potential historic sites" will be retained in the inventory and will be reevaluated prior to inclusion in the local register. As part of the register, the City will record all contributing features including secondary buildings and structures, as well as non-architectural site and landscape features. Policy LU-15.5: Designate local landmarks from the inventory. Discussion: Determine which surveyed resources already contained in the inventory of historic resources or otherwise evaluated as historically significant, such as through a National or California Register nomination, are currently eligible for listing in the local register of historic resources. GOAL LU-16: Protect historic resources. Policy LU-16.1: Incorporate historic preservation principles into the City's project review process. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-116 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: The City will continue to minimize potential impacts to historic resources when developing and enforcing land use, design review, zoning, building code, fire code, environmental review, and other City regulations. The City will use the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes (collectively, Secretary's Standards) as the standard of review for development projects affecting historic resources. The City will continue to evaluate and present to the City Historic Preservation Commission reviews for proposed exterior changes to surveyed, inventoried, and listed historic resources to evaluate project conformance with the Secretary's Standards. Policy LU-16.2: Avoid illegal demolition of historic resources and "demolition by neglect." Discussion: The City will create an ordinance or modify the existing Historic Preservation Ordinance to address illegal demolition of identified historic resources. Such an ordinance will include means of addressing historic properties that are being neglected and have fallen into disrepair, either in the Historic Preservation Ordinance or in a separate ordinance designed to deal specifically with this problem. GOAL LU-17: Expand preservation incentives. Policy LU-17.1: Allow for use of the Williamson Act (California Land Conservation Act). Discussion: The City will investigate the use of the Williamson Act, which encourages the City to enter into legal contracts with private landowners to restrict development on certain parcels of land to agriculture or open space use; in exchange, property owners will receive lower property tax assessments. Policy 1-1.1-17.2: Create a conservation easement program for historic resources. Discussion: The City will investigate such programs that provide a legal agreement between property owner and easement holder that are designed to protect significant historic/architectural and archaeological/cultural resources. Policy 1-1.1-17.1 Develop a preservation grant program. Discussion: The City will investigate a preservation grant program to provide financial and technical assistance to qualifying property owners that require assistance to repair their historic resources. Policy 1-1.1-17A Facilitate acquisition of preservation loans. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-117 Discussion: The City will investigate facilitating preservation loans that can be used for historically sensitive maintenance and rehabilitation of historic resources. Revolving loans involve an initial fund, established with a set amount of money, which is then distributed in the form of a loan to qualified projects or property owners. Interest and principal from the loans is paid back into the fund, to be redistributed for future loans. Policy LU-17.5: Continue to pursue designation as a Certified Local Government (CLG). Discussion: The CLG program requires the City to maintain a qualified historic preservation review commission, a historic resource survey, and to enact and enforce preservation regulations. Benefits of becoming a CLG include recognition of the City's preservation program, direct participation in Federal and State preservation programs, and access to designated funding, including funding for updating the City's historic context statement and historic resource survey. Certain changes to the City Historic Preservation Commission may be required to meet Office of Historic Preservation requirements. Policy LU-17.6: Continue to utilize Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funds for historic preservation. Discussion: CDBG funding can be used to support planning (for example, General Plan updates), historical resources surveys, re-use plans, consultant services, property acquisition, and rehabilitation, preservation, and restoration of public or private properties, among other efforts. Policy LU-17.7: Continue to promote use and knowledge of the California Historical Building Code (CHBC). Discussion: The CHBC is an alternative building code that enables owners of historic properties to employ reasonable alternatives or levels of equivalency to standard or prevailing code and/or regulation compliance when conformance with established codes and/or regulations would adversely affect the appearance or economic viability of qualified historic properties. The Historic Preservation Ordinance should cross reference use of the CHBC, which should also be included by reference in the local building code. Policy LU-17.8: Promote the use of the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program. Discussion: This program encourages private sector rehabilitation of historic properties by offering a Federal tax credit for building rehabilitation projects completed in conformance with the Secretary's Standards. A 20 percent tax credit is available for the certified rehabilitation of certified historic structures, and a 10 percent tax credit is available for the rehabilitation of non-historic, non-residential buildings built before 1936. Policy LU-17.9: Address adaptive re-use in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-118 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: Ordinances supporting adaptive re-use of historic properties encourage private property owners to adapt historic buildings to new uses, often by streamlining the permitting process for such development projects. Establishing development standards that apply to projects on a systematic rather than individual basis provides greater certainty that a re-use project can receive necessary entitlements, including parking waivers. While adaptive re-use of historic properties can be addressed in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, a separate Adaptive Re- use Ordinance could also address re-use of older, non-historic properties. Policy LU-17.10: Employ the use of floor area incentives. Discussion: The City will investigate the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) or Transfer of Floor-Area Ratio (TFAR) measures as a means of protecting land or redirecting development away from historic properties by transferring the rights to develop from one area and giving them to another. Such incentives could be used to avoid densification of the City's historically large lots that contain a single-unit residence surrounded by a historic vineyard or citrus grove, which is an increasingly rare property type in the City. Policy LU-17.11: Continue to make available land development incentives and modifications to development standards. Discussion: Incentives, such as relief from parking requirements (waivers), allowing for excavation of side yards, increased height and story allowances, and flexible setback requirements, will be considered and made available to property owners of historic resources. Such incentives can be added to the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Policy LU-17.12: Promote the use of the National Park Service (NPS) Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program's cost-share grant program for preservation of Historic Route 66 resources. Discussion: The NPS provides cost-share grant funds for preservation, restoration, and rehabilitation projects completed in conformance with the Secretary's Standards. GOAL LU-18: Identify and protect cultural landscape features. Policy LU-18.1: Prepare a Cultural Landscape Report. Discussion: The City will create a comprehensive plan for local cultural landscape preservation to complement architectural preservation efforts, beginning with development of a Cultural Landscape Report (CLR) that documents the history, significance and treatment of a cultural landscape [and] evaluates the history and integrity of the landscape including any changes to its geographical context, features, materials, and use. Cross reference cultural landscapes to the survey and inventory. Policy L1.1-18.2: Update files for identified historic resources to include extant cultural landscape features. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-119 Discussion: Extant historic landscape features will be considered contributing features of historic properties in the City that have been identified, starting with properties listed in the local register. Files for such resources will be updated to reflect contributing cultural landscapes. Policy LU-18.3: Create a conservation easement program for cultural landscapes. Mind Discussion: Conservation easement programs are an effective means of preserving significant historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources or agricultural lands for future generations. An easement on a property can be donated to a local preservation or nonprofit organization or governmental agency. Such an easement agreement would stipulate that the property remain in its current use for a period of time or in perpetuity. In exchange, the property owner gets a one-time tax deduction for donation of the easement while retaining ownership of the property. Future development and certain alterations to the property will require approval by the organization holding the easement. If title to the property changes hands, the easement remains in effect in perpetuity or for the number of years specified in the original easement donation. Policy 1-1.1-18A Continue to rebuild agricultural landscapes. earth Discussion: The City will continue to rebuild agricultural landscapes by either requiring or encouraging incorporation of historic landscape features, such as vineyards, fruit trees, and windbreaks into new development projects. Additionally, the City could identify land uses that are not suitable for development such as power line utility corridors where agricultural landscapes could be incorporated. These large swaths of visually displeasing land use could support agricultural landscaping while simultaneously eliminating a community fire hazard and promoting the City's beautification, healthy living, and historic preservation goals. Policy LU-18.5: Retain and restore windbreaks where appropriate. Discussion: The City will retain and rebuild historic tree windbreaks throughout the City to the maximum extent feasible using approved tree species for planting in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZs) in conformance with the Secretary's Standards. Apply the California Historic Building Code (CHBC) in limited instances where extant historic windbreaks would otherwise be removed due to fire concerns. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-120 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN GOAL LU-19: Identify and protect historic districts and Neighborhood Character Areas (NCAs). Policy LU-19.1: Identify historic districts and Neighborhood Character Areas (NCAs). Discussion: Identify potential boundaries for and contributing features of potential historic districts and NCAs in the survey. The City Historic Preservation Commission will recommend these boundary locations to make official the designation of historic districts and NCAs. Policy 1-1.1-19.2: Create new, and modify existing, specific plans to guide development of historic districts and Neighborhood Character Areas (NCAs). Discussion: Plans should reflect the City's design context, setting, and community character established by historic patterns of development in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary's Standards. The existing Etiwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plans will be amended to include plans to guide development of historic districts and NCAs. Policy 1-11-19.1 Evaluate post-World War II buildings for historic significance. Discussion: The City will perform a historic resource survey of all post-World War II buildings and housing tracts to determine eligibility of these resources for the local inventory and register of historic resources, and will add historic resources to the local inventory and register as appropriate. GOAL LU-20: Develop a historic resource interpretation program. Policy 1-11-20.1: Create a historic resource interpretation program aimed at 1�f enhancing both public awareness of local history and opportunities for heritage tourism. Mind Discussion: Although the City currently identifies local landmarks with markers and way-finding signage denoting proximity, these efforts should be expanded upon. The City will investigate and identify particularly popular historic sites, such as the John Rains House, Maloof Compound, Regina Winery, and Pacific Electric multi-use trail, with informational signage about local history and maps highlighting locations of other local historic resources. Individual historic resources and districts can be identified with markers and/or entry signage as they are designated. Points of entry to/from Pacific Electric Trail at Historic Town Centers will be highlighted with appropriate signage. The City will also need signage for"neighborhood identification." Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-121 GOAL LU-21: Preserve and interpret Historic Route 66 for residents, visitors, and business owners. Policy LU-21.1: Evaluate Route 66 properties and designate Route 66-related historic resources. Mind Discussion: Buildings erected on Foothill Boulevard from 1926 to 1970, the established nationwide period of significance for Route 66 properties, may be historically significant for their association with Route 66 and as such, the City will develop a method to evaluate these properties now to avoid loss of potentially significant historic resources. A survey can be conducted on the Route 66 properties in Rancho Cucamonga. Historic resources found to be significant for their association with Route 66 should be added to the local inventory and listed in the local register of historic resources. Policy LU-21.2' Amend the existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Development Code § 17.32) to include a linear Route 66 Neighborhood Character Area (NCA). Discussion: As extant Route 66 properties are few in number, tend to be altered, and are generally interrupted by new development, a linear Route 66 NCA can be established to include the roadway right-of-way and adjacent historic resources, including automobile service stations, roadside eateries, and motels. Remaining Route 66 resources are clustered, such as the Bear Gulch neighborhood. These groupings will be recognized with interpretive signage. Policy LU-21.1 Clarify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan/Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Mural Program to include policies that prioritize preservation of documented historic character of Route 66. Discussion: Scale, setback, and architectural design of new construction along Historic Route 66 will emphasize Foothill Boulevard as a center of commercial activity. Development will occur close to the road and not set back by large parking lots. Land uses and property types that historically lined Foothill Boulevard will be encouraged for future development. The City will consider replication of original Route 66 signage, encourage authenticity, and avoid adding non-historic streetscape features. The City will continue to encourage contemporary murals celebrating Route 66. GOAL LU-22: Create interpretative programs for the Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way. Policy 1.1.1-22.1: The City shall maintain and build on existing programs for Bod�'� Pacific Electric Trail development and interpretation. Y Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-122 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Discussion: Existing programs include extension of the Pacific Electric Trail throughout the City, construction of north-south trail systems to provide access from the Pacific Electric Trail to a variety of locations throughout the City, and wayfinding and informational signage and outdoor recreation amenities, such as benches and water fountains. The City is expanding recreational opportunities along the trail and providing public restrooms. The City can incorporate signage along the trail that publicizes the trail as a means of experiencing the City's historic town centers and connecting historic sites such as the Maloof Compound and Etiwanda Depot. Additional improvements to the trail that emphasize its role in development of Rancho Cucamonga's historic town centers will be included in local planning efforts, as well as in future amendments to the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan (adopted November 2000), as appropriate. GOAL LU-23: Educate residents and City staff to address historic properties. Policy LU-23.1: Continue to work with City staff and homeowners' organizations, historical societies, and historic preservation advocacy groups to develop education programs about the maintenance and care of historic buildings. Discussion: Programs can train owners how to be stewards of historic properties. Topics covered should include basic maintenance, along with techniques for appropriate renovation, restoration, and rehabilitation, as well as re-use of historic properties. The City could assign this task to a local organization and should establish a fund to be used to produce educational materials to support these efforts. Other historic preservation advocacy organizations, such as the California Preservation Foundation, could be utilized. Sponsorship of a statewide workshop in the City would highlight the importance of historic preservation in the community. Policy 1-1.1-23.2: Continue to train City staff in historic preservation. Discussion: City staff, including plan checkers, inspectors, and code enforcement officers, will be trained to review historic properties and detect inappropriate alterations to historic resources. The City will regularly inspect historic properties to enforce code compliance and appropriate preservation treatments. Development of a thorough understanding of how to use and apply the Secretary's Standards and California Historical Building Code will facilitate project approval when property owners are seeking permits. City staff will participate in statewide preservation conferences when possible and report on their experience at conference and workshops. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-123 This page intentionally left blank. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-124 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 AchievingOur Vision.................................................................................................................................................2 LandUse...................................................................................................................................................................4 LandUse Goals and Policies..................................................................................................................................58 CommunityDesign..................................................................................................................................................71 Community Design Goals and Policies...................................................................................................................96 HistoricResources................................................................................................................................................ 102 Historic Preservation Goals and Policies.............................................................................................................. 115 List of Tables Table LU-1: Land Use Distribution - 2009.................................................................................................................4 Table LU-2: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Land Use Mix..................................................................................23 Table LU-3: Mixed Use: Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue).....................................................27 Table LU-4: Mixed Use: Terra Vista........................................................................................................................28 Table LU-5: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue.................................28 Table LU-6: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue...................30 Table LU-7: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street............................................31 Table LU-8: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue ...........................................................................32 Table LU-9: Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan/Subarea 18.........................................................................33 Table LU-10: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel..................................................................33 Table LU-11: Mixed Use: Haven Avenue and Church Street Site..........................................................................34 Table LU-12: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Gateway Bear Gulch Area).................................................................35 Table LU-13: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard —Cucamonga Channel Site .............................................................35 Table LU-14: Mixed Use: Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) .............................................................................................36 TableLU-15: Build-Out Summary...........................................................................................................................37 Table LU-16: Land Use Plan Summary-Residential Designations .........................................................................38 Table LU-17: Land Use Plan Summary-Non-Residential Designations..................................................................39 Table LU-18: Build Out Summary by Land Use......................................................................................................41 Table LU-19: Slope Development Guidelines.........................................................................................................49 Table LU-20: General Plan Land Use Designations and Development District Consistency Matrix ......................51 Table LU-21: Adopted Specific Plans and Planned Communities..........................................................................52 Table LU-22: General Plan Special Boulevards .....................................................................................................80 Table LU-23: Beautification Master Plans...............................................................................................................82 Table LU-24: Entry Monuments Design Elements..................................................................................................85 List of Figures Figure LU-1: Floor-Area Ratio (FAR)........................................................................................................................9 FigureLU-2: Land Use Plan ................................................................................................................................... 11 FigureLU-3: Mixed Use Areas................................................................................................................................24 FigureLU-4: Focus Areas.......................................................................................................................................45 Figure LU-5: Specific Plans and Planned Communities.........................................................................................53 Figure LU-6: Community Design Framework..........................................................................................................77 Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations................................................................................................................84 Figure LU-8: Historic Resources........................................................................................................................... 111 Creating Pedestrian Connectivity Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-125 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWED USES, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.26 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 17.26.010 Chapter purpose. 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. 17.26.010 Chapter purpose. This chapter establishes the framework of zoning districts within the city and their relationships to the city's general plan land use designations. (Code 1980, § 17.26.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. A. Zoning district purpose. Zoning districts are established in order to classify, regulate, designate, and distribute the uses of land and buildings; to regulate and restrict the height, setbacks and bulk of buildings; to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces around buildings; and to regulate the density of population. The city is divided into zoning districts that are grouped into two categories: (a) base zoning districts and (b)overlay zoning districts. These districts are listed and described in Table 17.26.020-1 (Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts), along with the general plan land use designation that they implement. B. Base zoning districts. The base zoning district is the primary zoning district that applies to a property. Every parcel throughout the city has a base zoning district that establishes the primary land use type, density, intensity, and site development regulations. Base districts are grouped into six categories as follows: 1. Residential Zoning Districts. 2. Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 3. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. 4. Industrial Zoning Districts. 5. Open Space Zoning Districts. 6. Special Purpose Zoning Districts. C. Overlay zoning districts. The Overlay Zoning Districts supplement base zoning districts for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To allow more flexibility from the standard provisions of the underlying base zone. 2. To protect unique site features or implement location-specific regulations. 3. To specify a particular standard or guideline for an area. D. In the event of a conflict between the regulations of the base zoning district and the Overlay Zoning District, the provisions of the Overlay Zoning District shall apply. TABLE 17.26.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Residential Zoning Districts Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a VL minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. L Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 s are feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. Low Medium Residential. Designates areas for low medium density single-family or LM multiple-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with site M development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum. Medium High Residential. Designates areas for medium high density multiple-family use, MH with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site H development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use Zoning Districts Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site MU development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Mixed Use—General Urban. Designates areas for a mix of residential and non-residential MU-GU uses of lower intensity, with site development standards that assure buildings create walkable streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. Mixed Use— Urban Corridor. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential MU-UCR uses of medium to high intensity, with site development regulations that assure buildings create a vibrant pedestrian environment and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. Mixed Use— Urban Center. Designates areas for a mix of residential and non-residential MU-UCT uses of high intensity, with site development regulations that allow for infill development with buildings that transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of OP professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relativel compatible with residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience NC shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. GC General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping facilities, major service- Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the city or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on a CC larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the SC Thomas Brothers Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses in other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial development RRC that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large-format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. Commercial Office. Designates areas for activities that cater to business support and CO personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Industrial Zoning Districts Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light IP industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. Neo-Industrial. Designates areas to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; and NI convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district can allow for small scale, context sensitive warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support small business development. Industrial Employment. Designates areas reserved for manufacturing, processing, construction and heavy equipment yards, warehousing and storage, e-commerce distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that typically generate more truck IE traffic, noise,and environmental impacts than would be compatible with office and residential uses. This zoning district prohibits non-industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses(such as restaurants or convenience stores)that support the employees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Open Space Zoning Districts Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. The use OS regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public safety; HR protecting water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control. Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. UC Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. Special Purpose Zoning Districts Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a specific plan SP with unique land use and development standards for a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a Planned PC Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area. Planned Communities typically include less detail than specific tans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay Zoning Districts Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the SH city's senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with an residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes a "rural/farm" E character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district ualifications. Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the general plan for this FB important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the city. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development regulations. H Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. Industrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District to IC encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and special develo ment review requirements focused on retail opportunities. LW Large Warehouse. Designates area where large industrial buildings with a gross floor area over 450,000 square feet are permitted. (Code 1980, § 17.26.020; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) Chapter 17.30 ALLOWED LAND USE BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 17.30.010 Purpose. 17.30.020 Classification of land uses. 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. 17.30.040 Other allowed use provisions. 17.30.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish allowed land uses and corresponding requirements for permits and entitlements for each of the city's base zoning districts. Uses allowed herein are consistent with and implement the corresponding land use designations in the city's general plan. Allowed land uses include both primary and accessory uses that are permanent in nature. Regulations for temporary uses are listed separately in chapter 17.104 (Temporary Uses). (Code 1980, § 17.30.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 17.30.020 Classification of land uses. In order to simplify land use regulations, land uses listed in this chapter and throughout this title have been grouped into general categories on the basis of common function, product, or compatibility characteristics. These allowed use categories are called "use classifications." Use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification. Each land use is described in chapter 17.32(Allowed Use Descriptions). For example,"personal service use" includes a wide range of individual personal service uses (beauty parlor, dry cleaning, tanning salons, tailors). Rather than listing all such uses individually throughout this title, "personal service use" is listed once and is further described in chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions). The following rules apply to use classifications: A. Specific use regulations. Additional use regulations for specific land uses are listed in article V(Specific Use Requirements). B. Temporary uses. Land use classifications in this chapter identify both primary and secondary or accessory uses that are permanent in nature. Temporary uses are separately listed and regulated in chapter 17.104 (Temporary Uses). C. Uses not listed. Land uses that are not listed in the zoning district tables are not allowed, except as otherwise provided for in this title. D. Illegal uses. No use that is illegal under local, state, or federal law shall be allowed in any zoning district within the city. E. Overlayzoning districts.When a property is located within an Overlay Zoning District,any special allowed use provisions associated with said Overlay Zoning District shall apply. If the special allowed use provisions for the Overlay Zoning District are in conflict with the allowed use provisions of the base zoning district, the allowed use provisions for the Overlay Zoning District shall prevail. F. Special planning areas. When a property is located within a designated Special Planning Area (e.g., Specific Plan, Planned Community, master plan), there may be special allowed use provisions associated with the adopted/approved area plan. If the documents associated with the Special Planning Area are silent regarding allowed use provisions, the allowed use provisions of the base zoning district shall apply. If the allowed use provisions of the adopted/approved area plan conflict with the allowed use provisions of the base zoning district, the allowed use provisions for the Special Planning Area shall prevail. Page 1 G. Similar uses. When a use is not specifically listed in this Code, it shall be understood that the use may be permitted if the planning director determines that the use is substantially similar to other uses listed based on established criteria and required findings outlined in section 17.16.100 (Similar Use Determination). It is further recognized that every conceivable use cannot be identified in this title and, anticipating that new uses will evolve over time, the planning director may make a similar use determination to compare a proposed use and measure it against those uses listed. (Code 1980, § 17.30.020; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. A. Allowed land uses. Allowed uses and corresponding permit and entitlement requirements for the base zoning districts are listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Uses are organized into common categories as follows: 1. Residential uses. 2. Agriculture and animal related uses. 3. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 4. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 5. Retail, service, and office uses. 6. Automobile and vehicle uses. 7. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. B. Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) include: 1. Permitted (P). A land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this title (e.g., development standards) as well state and federal law. 2. Conditionally permitted(C). A land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. 3. Not permitted (N). A land use shown with an "N" is not allowed in the applicable zoning district. Additionally, uses not shown in the table are not permitted, except as otherwise provided for in this title. 4. Adult entertainment permit(A).A land use shown with an"A"indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of an adult entertainment permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development operational standards) as well as state and federal law. C. Base zoning district names and symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. •Very Low Residential (VL) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Low Residential (L) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Low Medium Residential (LM) • Commercial Office (CO) • Medium Residential (M) • Industrial Park (IP) Page 2 • Medium High Residential (MH) • Neo-Industrial (NI) • High Residential (H) • Industrial Employment (IE) • Mixed Use (MU) • Open Space (OS) • Mixed Use—General Urban (MU-GU) • Hillside Residential District (HR) • Mixed Use—Urban Corridor(MU-UCR) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) • Mixed Use—Urban Center(MU-UCT) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) • Office Professional (OP) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • General Commercial (GC) • Community Commercial (CC) TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU MU- MU- MU- OP INC GC CC SC RRC CO IP Ni IE OS HR FC UC District GU UCR UCT (Residential Uses Adult Day Care Home P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Caretaker Housing M M M M M M M M M M P P P N N N N M M M P M P P Dwelling,Multi-Family N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling,Single- P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family — Dwelling,Two-Family N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emerqencv Shelter N N N N N N I N N N N N N P N N N N N C N N N N N Family Day Care Home,La a�"� M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N r — — Family Day Care P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home,Small Guest House P P P I N I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group Residential M M M M M M M J M M M M M M M N M N N N N N M N N Home Occupation(2) P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Manufactured Home(3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Park(3) M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care N M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility — — Residential Care P P P P P P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Short-Term Rental(16) P P P P P P P P P P P N N P P P P N P P P P P Single-Room N N N P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occu anc Facility Transitional Housing P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets(4) Animal Keeping,Exotic Animals(^) M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Insects(4) Animal Keeping, P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N Livestock Animals(4) Animal Keeping,poultry(4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Commercial — Equestrian Facility, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Hobby — — Land Use/Zoning MU- MU- MU_ District VL L LM M MH H MU GU UCR UCT OP IN GC CC SC RRC CO IP Ni IE OS HR FC UC Recreation,Resource Preservation,Open Space,Education,and Public Assembl Uses (Assembly Use M I M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Page 3 Cemetery/Mausoleum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N Community M M M M M M M M j M M M M M M M N P P N N M N N Center/Civic Use Community Garden M M M M M M N N J N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Convention Center N N N N N N M M j M M M M M M M M M C C N N N N Golf N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Course/Clubhouse Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N M M M M N M M P P P N M C N N N N N Entertainment Facility Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N M M 1 M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Sports Facility—Large Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N P P P P P M P P M C N N N N N Sports Facility—Small Library and Museum M M M M M M P P P P N P N P M N N M M M M Page 4 Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N M M M M M M M N N M M M C N N N N N Recreation Park and Public Plaza P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N M M M P P P P Public Safety Facility M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C C N M N N Resource-Related P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation — — — School,Academic M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N M N N Private School,Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P N N Public — — — School, College/University M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N M N N Private School, College/University M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N C N N Public Schools,Specialized Education and N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M C C C N N N N Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N M M M M N N M N N P N N N N N N N N Auditoriums TutoringCent er—Lar e N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N TutoringCenter—Small N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Utility,Transportation,Public Facility,and Communication Uses Broadcasting and N N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N Recording Studios — Park and Ride Facility N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N C P C N N N N Parkinq Facilitv N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N _NL N Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Fixed N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C C N M M Based Structures Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines"I Wind Energy System— P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Small(10) Land Use/Zoning MU- MU- MU- District VL L LM M MH H MU GU UCR UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Retail,Service,and Office Uses Adult Day Care Facilit N N N N N N M M M M M M M N N N M C C N N N N N Adult-Oriented Business(s) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A N N N N Alcoholic Beverage N N N N N N M M M N M M M M M M M M N N N N N Sales Ambulance Service N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N C P N N N N Animal Sales and N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N Grooming — — — Art,Antique,Collectable N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Shop(11) - - - Artisan Shop(13> N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N M M M M M M P P P P P P P N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N M M M M M N M M M M M N C N N N N N Bed and Breakfast Inn M M M N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M P N N N N and Yard Business Support N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Services — — Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M C N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N I N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business N N N N N N P P P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N Child Day Care N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N M M M P P N N N N Facility/Center Commercial Cannabis N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Activity Consignment Store N N N N N N M M M M N M M N MI N I NJ N N N N NJ NJ N Page 5 Convenience Store N N N N N N P P P P N P P N M N N M M N N N N N Crematory Services(7) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N Drive-In and Drive- Through Sales and N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N M M M M N N N N N Service(1) Land Use/Zoning MU- MU- MU_ District VL L LM M MH H MU GU UCR UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Equipment Sales and N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C P N N N N Rental Feed and Tack Store N I N I N N I N I N IN.NN N N I P I P I N N I N I N I N N N N N N N Furniture,Furnishing, N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N and Appliance Store — — — Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N N P P P N P P Nurser — — — Grocery N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N Store/Supermarket Gun Sales N I N I N N I N I N I N N N N N I N I M I N N N I N I M M N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N M M M M N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N M P P N N N N Supply Store — — — Hotel N N N N N N M M M M M N M N N M M M N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Kennel,Commercial N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M C N N N N N Liquor Store N N N N N N M M M M N M M M M M N M M N N N N N Maintenance and Repair,Small N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P P P P P N N N N Equipment Massage Establishment N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Massage Establishment,Ancillary N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N (1a) Medical Services, N M M M M M M M M M P N P P N N P P P N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N General — — — Medical Services, N N M M M M M M M M M N M N N N N P P N N N N N Hospitals Land Use/Zoning MU- MU- MU District VL L LM M MH H MU GU UCR UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Mobile Hot Food Truck N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Mortuary/Funeral Home N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N N N N N N N Office,Business and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Professional — — — Office,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Pawnshop(7) N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Personal Services N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Restaurant,No Liquor N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Service — — — Restaurant,Beer and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P C N N N N Wine I — — — Restaurant,Full Liquor N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N Service Retail,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N P P M M P N N N N Retail,General N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N M M C N N N N Retail,Warehouse Club N N N N N N P P P P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N Secondhand Dealer N N N N N N P P P P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N ShootingRange N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C N N N N N Smoke Shop(') N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N N N N N N N N Specialty Food Store(13) N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N Tattoo Shop(') N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N jL N Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N M M M M N M M M N M N N N N N N Veterinar Facilit M N N N N N M M M M N P P M M M N N P P N N Automobile and Vehicle Uses Auto and Vehicle Sales N N N N N I N N N N N M I N I M I N I N P N M M N N I N I N I N and Rental Page 6 Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Stora e18 Auto Parts Sales N N N I N N N N N N N N P P N I N P N I N I P N N N I N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M N N N N N N Detailing Recreational Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Service Stations N I N I N N N N M j M M M M P M N M M M M N N N N N Vehicle Services,Major N I N I N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N P P N N N N Vehicle Services,Minor N t N N N N N N N M M P N N M N P P N N N N N Land Use/Zoning VL M MH H MU MU- MU- MU- OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC District GU UCR UCT Industrial,Manufacturing,and Processing Uses Commercial (Secondary/Accessory) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N -Industrial Commercial (Repurposing)- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N N N Industrial E-Commerce Distribution Distribution/Fulfillment N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Center,Small(12) Distribution/ Fulfillment Center, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Large Parcel Sorting N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facilities Parcel Hub Small(< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 130,000 s .ft. Parcel Hub Large(> N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 130,000 s .ft. Lumber Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I N C N N N N Maker Space/Accessory N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N M P P N N N N Maker Space Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N Custom�12) Manufacturing,Green N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Technology Manufacturing,Light- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Small(l2) Manufacturing,Light Lar e('2) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Microbrewery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Printing and Publishing N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N C C N N N N Collection Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Processing Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Development Storage,Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C C N N N N Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Li ht(12) Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C P N N N N Medium(12) Table Notes: (1) Reserved. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. Page 7 (4) See additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. (12) Not permitted on any parcel that is located within,or partly within,five hundred(500)feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. (13) Permitted in Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts when proposed in conjunction with"Commercial(Repurposing)—Industrial'. (14) Massage establishment permit required.See additional regulations for massage establishments in chapter 5.18. (16) A short-term rental must be a single family residence in zoning districts other than VL,L,and LM.See additional regulations for short-term rentals in Chapter 8.34. (17)Maximum building gross floor area for all industrial uses is 450,000 square feet.A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area. (18)Auto and vehicle storage is permitted as an on-or off-site accessory use to any manufacturing use upon issuance of a minor use permit. The minor use permit may also permit truck storage as an accessory use to manufacturing. (Code 1980, § 17.30.030; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 858 § 4, 2013; Ord. No. 860 § 4, 2013; Ord. No. 863 §4, 2013; Ord. No. 867, 2014; Ord. No. 873 §§ 4, 6, 2015; Ord. No. 879 § 4, 2015; Ord. No. 881 §4, 2015; Ord. No. 866§4, 2016; Ord. No. 895§3, 2016; Ord. No. 921 §5, 2017; Ord. No. 922§ 3, 2017; Ord. No. 938 § 5, 2018; Ord. No. 944 § 2, 2019; Ord. No. 948 §4, 2019; Ord. No. 949 § 1, 2019; Ord. No. 969 § 1, 2020) Page 8 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability.The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the city's Mixed Use Zoning Districts. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the general plan. TABLE 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT Standard Site/Lot Area n/a n/a n/a n/a (minimum)(1) Lot Width/Depth n/a n/a n/a n/a (minimum) Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a n/a n/a n/a Maximum Density 50 units/acre 24-42 36-60 40-100 units/acre units/acre units/acre Project shall Protect shall Project shall Protect shall incorporate a incorporate a incorporate a incorporate a minimum of two minimum of two minimum of two minimum of two of the following of the following of the following of the following types of land types of land types of land types of land Land Use Mix(2>) uses: uses: uses: uses: Commercial, Commercial, Commercial, Commercial, Office, Office, Office, Office, Institutional, Institutional, Institutional, Institutional, Residential, Residential, Residential, Residential, Live/Work Live/Work Live/Work Live/Work Setbacks(4)(1) Street Yard 50%-75% 0—10 ft. 0—10 ft. 0—5 ft. (Major/Special reduction of Boulevard) streetscape requirements�a> 50%-75% Street Yard reduction of 0—10 ft. 0—10 ft. 0—5 ft. (Secondary/Collector) streetscape requirements�$> 75%- 100% Street Yard (Local reduction of 0—10 ft. 0—10 ft. 0—5 ft. Streets) streetscape requirements`) Match rear yard Match rear yard Match rear yard Match rear yard Rear Yard (adjacent setback setback setback setback R residential) requirements of requirements of requirements of requirements of to adjacent base adjacent base adjacent base adjacent base district district district district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet industrial) Development MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT Standard Match side yard Match side yard Match side yard Match side yard Interior Side setback setback setback setback (adjacent to requirements of requirements of requirements of requirements of residential) adjacent base adjacent base adjacent base adjacent base district district district district Interior Side (adjacent to 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet commercial or industrial) Distance Between Buildings Minimum per Minimum per Minimum per Minimum per Primary Buildings Building Code Building Code Building Code Building Code requirements requirements requirements requirements Minimum per Minimum per Minimum per Minimum per Accessory Buildings Building Code Building Code Building Code Building Code requirements requirements requirements requirements Building Height (maximum in feet)(?) Primary Buildings 75 feet maximum 3 stories min.— 4 stories min.— 12 stories max. 5 stories max. 7 stories max. Not to exceed Not to exceed Not to exceed Not to exceed Accessory Buildings primary building primary building primary building primary building height height height height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area 10% minimum 10% minimum 10% minimum 10% minimum (overall net area) Minimum of 150 Minimum of 150 Minimum of 150 Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; square square square Open Space See Section feet/unit; See feet/unit; See feet/unit; See Requirements 17.36.020(D)for Section Section Section additional 17.36.020 (D) 17.36.020(D) 17.36.020(D) requirements for additional for additional for additional requireets mn requirements requirements Recreation Required per Required per Required per Required per Area/Facility Section Section Section Section 17.36.010(E) 17.36.010(E) 17.36.010 (E) 17.36.010(E) Parking Requirement See Table See Table See Table See Table 17.64.050-1; 17.64.050-1; 17.64.050-1; 17.64.050-1; NOTE:A parking NOTE:A NOTE:A NOTE:A Parking Spaces study is required parking study is parking study is parking study is for all Mixed Use required for all required for all required for all projects per Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use Section protects per protects per protects per 17.64.060(D) Development MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT Standard Section Section Section 17.64.060(D) 17.64.060(D) 17.64.060(D) Allowed per Allowed per Allowed per Allowed per Accessory Dwelling Chapter 17.100 Chapter 17.100 Chapter 17.100 Chapter 17.100 Units (Accessory (Accessory (Accessory (Accessory Dwelling Units) Dwelling Units) Dwelling Units) Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three(3)acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half('/2)acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis,at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. &) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (?) All buildings within one hundred(100)feet of LM,L,or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet(25');however,there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum,and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (D For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. B. Open space mixed use development standards. 1. Front and/or street yard setbacks do not count towards meeting the usable open space requirements. 2. Required perimeter and parking landscape area, per section 17.56.060(N), shall not be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement, but is counted towards the overall landscape requirement. 3. A maximum of 30 percent of the total requirement for private open space shall be counted toward required open space area. Additional private open space area will not count towards the total requirement for open space. This maximum 30 percent requirement may be modified by not more than five percent if determined to be necessary during design review. 4. Each private open space shall have a minimum width and depth of six feet. 5. Each common open space shall have at least one minimum dimension of 15 feet and the other dimensions shall be at least six feet, except for private open space (e.g., balconies or patios). a. Open space shall include both indoor/interior space and outdoor open space. b. Open space can be in the form of private open space (e.g., balconies) or common open space (e.g., pool or side or rear setback areas). C. An indoor recreational room of up to 600 square feet may be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement. d. A landscaped and usable utility easement may be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement if it is properly landscaped in compliance with chapter 17.56 (Landscaping). (Code 1980, § 17.36.020; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 881, §4, 2015; Ord. No. 890, § 5(Atts. A, B, D), 8-3-2016; Ord. No. 894, § 5(Att. 1), 9-21-2016; Ord. No. 972 § 5, 2020) WILSONAVE BEECHAVE' W U O J m Y W U Q Cr O BASE LINE RD W Q. Q r Q W m Existing General Plan Z w Q =� m = - Community Commercial U momFOOTHILLBLVD 1qa r General Commercial i 0 Industrial Park 0�ARROWRTE Medium Residential a - Mixed Use Q LU w 6TH ST I i N 34 WTH ST Miles Q City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSON AVE BEECH AVER Q - U O J tt1 Y W W U Q BASE LINE RD �q Y� W r Q Proposed General Plan w m Land Use Changes = D Z U D � _L m = 0 City Center Q U �Va m O FOOTHILL BLVD °cl� ,d r-P] 0 City Corridor Moderate 0 City Corridor High ARROW RTE El w V Q O z LU w 6TH ST N o 114 1�2 34 1 4TH ST Draft, July 26, 2021 Miles LWj City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSONAVE BEECH 1% Q O Cr m Y W W U Q O BASE LINE RD IU Q. r C � Q r Q w m Existing Zoning z Q =� m = 0 Community Commercial (CC) �o m . .= FOOTHILL BLVD ° ,� �� %r ® Commercial/Office (CO) i, General Commercial (GC) 0 Industrial Park(IP) �ARROWRTE a 0 Low-Medium Residential (LM) 0 Financial (MFC) 0 0 Mixed Use (MU) z 0 Regional Rel. Ofc/Comm (RRO/C) Uj w 6TH ST N 0 1�4 1�2 34 1 4TH ST Miles La City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 WILSON AVE BEEC ,O J m Y W W U ¢ O BASE LINE RD Q. Q r Q w m ® Proposed Zoning Changes = W < = 0 General Urban ILa m iO/. FOOTHILL BLVD ° / ,� %� 0 Urban Center ��� 0 Urban Corridor �ARROWRTE El 0 I 2 � W 6TH ST N O 1/4 1/Z 3/4 1 Draft, July 26, 2021 4TH ST Miles LaU City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE URBAN CORRIDOR ZONING DISTRICT Development 9 Standard MU-UCR� Site/Lot Area (minimum)(1) n/a Lot Width/Depth n/a (minimum) Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 36-60 units/acre Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land Land Use Mix(1)(3) uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks(4)(1) Street Yard (Major/Special 0— 10 ft. Boulevard) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 0— 10 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 0— 10 ft. Match rear yard Rear Yard (adjacent setback to residential) requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or 0 feet industrial) Match side yard Interior Side setback (adjacent to requirements of residential) adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to 5 feet commercial or industrial) Distance Between Buildings Minimum per Primary Buildings Building Code requirements Development MU-UCR(9) Standard Minimum per Accessory Buildings Building Code requirements Building Height (maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 4 stories min.— 7 stories max. Not to exceed Accessory Buildings primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area o (overall net area) 10/o minimum Minimum of 150 square Open Space feet/unit; See Requirements Section 17.36.020(D) for additional requirements Recreation Required per Area/Facility Section 17.36.010(E) Parking Requirement See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE:A parking study is Parking Spaces required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Allowed per Accessory Dwelling Chapter 17.100 Units (Accessory Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three(3)acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half('/2)acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis,at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings,parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred(100)feet of LM, L,or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet(25');however,there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum,and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. (9) Permitted land uses within the Urban Corridor Zoning District are governed by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapters 17.30 and 17.32. . DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT Development Standard MU-UCT Site/Lot Area (minimum)(1) n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 40-100 units/acre Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land Land Use Mix(2)(1) uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks(4)(5) Street Yard (Major/Special 0—5 ft. Boulevard) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 0—5 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 0—5 ft. Match rear yard Rear Yard (adjacent setback to residential) requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or 0 feet industrial) Match side yard Interior Side setback (adjacent to requirements of residential) adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to 5 feet commercial or industrial) Distance Between Buildings Minimum per Primary Buildings Building Code requirements Development Standard MU-UCT Minimum per Accessory Buildings Building Code requirements Building Height (maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 12 stories max. Not to exceed Accessory Buildings primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area o (overall net area) 10/o minimum Minimum of 150 square Open Space feet/unit; See Requirements Section 17.36.020(D) for additional requirements Recreation Required per Area/Facility Section 17.36.010(E) Parking Requirement See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE:A parking study is Parking Spaces required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Allowed per Accessory Dwelling Chapter 17.100 Units (Accessory Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three(3)acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half('/2)acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis,at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings,parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred(100)feet of LM, L,or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet(25');however,there maybe areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum,and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. (9) Permitted land uses within the Urban Corridor Zoning District are governed by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapters 17.30 and 17.32. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT Development Standard MU-UCT Site/Lot Area (minimum)(1) n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 40-100 units/acre Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land Land Use Mix(2)(1) uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks(4)(5) Street Yard (Major/Special 0—5 ft. Boulevard) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 0—5 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 0—5 ft. Match rear yard Rear Yard (adjacent setback to residential) requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or 0 feet industrial) Match side yard Interior Side setback (adjacent to requirements of residential) adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to 5 feet commercial or industrial) Distance Between Buildings Minimum per Primary Buildings Building Code requirements Development Standard MU-UCT Minimum per Accessory Buildings Building Code requirements Building Height (maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 12 stories max. Not to exceed Accessory Buildings primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area o (overall net area) 10/o minimum Minimum of 150 square Open Space feet/unit; See Requirements Section 17.36.020(D) for additional requirements Recreation Required per Area/Facility Section 17.36.010(E) Parking Requirement See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE:A parking study is Parking Spaces required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Allowed per Accessory Dwelling Chapter 17.100 Units (Accessory Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three(3)acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half('/2)acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis,at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings,parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred(100)feet of LM, L,or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet(25');however,there maybe areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum,and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. (9) Permitted land uses within the Urban Corridor Zoning District are governed by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapters 17.30 and 17.32.