HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/10/20 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketMayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Sam Spagnolo
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
October 20, 2021
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC
FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00
p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of
meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. Live
Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.
TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION
PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED
VIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITY
D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT
AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR
COURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)
D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROW
ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDING
PRICE AND TERMS. – CITY
D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK
STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAH
WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDING
PRICE AND TERMS. – CITY
D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE
NO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)
D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES AND
FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)
D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,
FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,
PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR
TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,
A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE
LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND
JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED
ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN
GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,
TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY
NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 1
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo &,7<2)5$1&+2&8&$021*$5(*8/$50((7,1*$*(1'$2FWREHU10500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730),5(3527(&7,21',675,&7%2$5'±&,7<&281&,/+286,1*68&&(6625$*(1&<68&&(6625$*(1&<±38%/,&),1$1&($87+25,7<&/26('6(66,21 75,&20081,7,(65220 305(*8/$50((7,1*6&281&,/&+$0%(56 30The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).&/26('6(66,21± 3075,&20081,7,(6522052//&$// Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo $$11281&(0(172)&/26('6(66,21,7(0 6 %38%/,&&20081,&$7,21621&/26('6(66,21,7(0 6 &&,7<0$1$*(5$11281&(0(176'&21'8&72)&/26('6(66,21'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED
VIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT
AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR
COURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROW
ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDING
PRICE AND TERMS. – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK
STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAH
WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDING
PRICE AND TERMS. – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE
NO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)
'CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES AND
FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,
FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,
PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR
TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
' CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,
A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE
LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND
JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED
ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN
GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,
TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY
NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
(5(&(66±Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
5(*8/$50((7,1*± 30
&281&,/&+$0%(56
3/('*(2)$//(*,$1&(
52//&$// Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
$$0(1'0(176727+($*(1'$
%$11281&(0(1735(6(17$7,216
%Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
%Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
&38%/,&&20081,&$7,216
0HPEHUVRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLODOVRVLWDVWKH)LUH%RDUG+RXVLQJ6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\6XFFHVVRU
$JHQF\DQG3XEOLF)LQDQFH$XWKRULW\7KLVLVWKHWLPHDQGSODFHIRUWKHJHQHUDOSXEOLFWRDGGUHVV
WKH)LUH3URWHFWLRQ'LVWULFW+RXVLQJ6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\3XEOLF)LQDQFLQJ
$XWKRULW\%RDUGDQG&LW\&RXQFLORQDQ\LWHPOLVWHGRUQRWOLVWHGRQWKHDJHQGDState law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
&RPPHQWVDUHWREHOLPLWHGWRILYHPLQXWHVSHULQGLYLGXDORUOHVVDVGHHPHGQHFHVVDU\E\WKH
0D\RUGHSHQGLQJXSRQWKHQXPEHURILQGLYLGXDOVGHVLULQJWRVSHDN All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
7KHSXEOLFFRPPXQLFDWLRQVSHULRGZLOOQRWH[FHHGRQHKRXUSULRUWRWKHFRPPHQFHPHQWRIWKH
EXVLQHVVSRUWLRQRIWKHDJHQGD During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
&216(17&$/(1'$56
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
'&216(17&$/(1'$5
'Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
'Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
'Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
' Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
'Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
'Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
'Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
'Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
' Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
'Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
'Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
'Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
(&216(17&$/(1'$525',1$1&( 6 6(&21'5($',1*$'237,21
)$'0,1,675$7,9(+($5,1*,7(0 6
)Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
*$'9(57,6('38%/,&+($5,1*6,7(0 6 &,7<),5(',675,&7
*Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
+&,7<0$1$*(5
667$))5(3257 6
,&281&,/%86,1(66
,&281&,/$11281&(0(176
&RPPHQWVWREHOLPLWHGWRWKUHHPLQXWHVSHU&RXQFLO0HPEHU
,,17(5$*(1&<83'$7(6
(8SGDWHE\WKH&LW\&RXQFLOWRWKHFRPPXQLW\RQWKHPHHWLQJVWKDWZHUHDWWHQGHG)
-&,7<$77251(<,7(06
.,'(17,),&$7,212),7(06)251(;70((7,1*
/$'-28510(17
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
&(57,),&$7,21
,/LQGD$7UR\DQ00&&LW\&OHUN6HUYLFHV'LUHFWRURIWKH&LW\RI5DQFKR&XFDPRQJDRUP\GHVLJQHHKHUHE\
FHUWLI\XQGHUSHQDOW\RISHUMXU\WKDWDWUXHDFFXUDWHFRS\RIWKHIRUHJRLQJDJHQGDZDVSRVWHGRQDWOHDVW
WZHQW\IRXU KRXUVSULRUWRWKHPHHWLQJSHU*RYHUQPHQW&RGH DW&LYLF&HQWHU'ULYH5DQFKR
&XFDPRQJD&DOLIRUQLD &XOWXUDO&HQWHU'ULYH5DQFKR&XFDPRQJD&$ DQGRQWKH&LW\
VZHEVLWH
/,1'$$752<$100&
&,7<&/(5.6(59,&(6',5(&725
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 2
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,
A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE
LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY
D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND
JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED
ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN
GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,
TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY
NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 3
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY
NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND
CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 4
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 5
---
---
ELECTRIC RESCUE TOOLS
CURRENT SET-UP
LOCATED ON MEDIC TRUCK 174, MEDIC TRUCK 175,
RESCUE 175 AND THE RESERVE TRUCK
•Requires 4 large hose reels
•5000 psi system
•Vehicle mounted hydraulic pump
•Carbon Monoxide and greenhouse gases emitted
•Minimum of 5 different tools
•Large amount of storage space required
•All apparatus with hydraulic tools also require a gas-
powered accessory pump
•Estimated $70,000 per apparatus Hurst Hydraulic
Rescue Tools
•Outdated technology that struggles with the advanced
materials utilized in modern vehicles
MOVING FORWARD
•The RCFD Apparatus Committee has invested in researching and bidding a
new generation of electric rescue tools for this unit
•Replacement USAR Heavy Rescue unit is currently under construction and will
have these tools
•These new tools are ½ the cost with 2x the power, speed, and efficiency of
our current equipment
HOLMATRO RESCUE TOOLS -ALL-ELECTRIC PENTHEON SERIES
THE FUTURE IS ELECTRIC
•Community Benefit –Allows for safer, faster, and more efficient extrication
•More freedom of movement –No pump or hose attached
•No set-up time –Just press the on/off button to start working
•Less storage space required –No pumps or hoses to store
•No emissions –Healthier for rescuers, patients, and the environment
•Less maintenance –No pumps or hoses to check
ALL ELECTRIC OPERATION
•Only 3 tools needed
•Allows for safe use in confined
spaces
•No risk of carbon monoxide
poisoning
•10,000 psi system
•Could be used for emergencies in
the proposed OIA tunnel
NEW CAR TECHNOLOGY
CUTTER PCU60
SUPERIOR CUTTING PERFORMANCE ON NEW CARS
•The U-shaped blades pull even the toughest materials into the
cutting recess, which will allow for the best cutting performance
on modern and future (even stronger) car models.
•Inclined cutting is a completely new, revolutionary cutting
technology.
•Extricating patients under challenging conditions has just become
safer, quicker, and easier than ever.
•396,788 lbf of cutting force
SPREADER PSP60
•Unparalleled Speed
•Ultimate Control
•Extended working time
•Under water use
•Realtime diagnostics
•Ease of use
•117,350 lbf spreading force
SMART RAM EXTENSION
INTEGRATED LASER POINTER
TELESCOPIC RAM PTR50
BATTERY
PURPOSE-BUILT BATTERY WITH HIGH CAPACITY. DESIGNED FOR EXTENDED WORKING TIME.
•7Ah capacity
•Contains extra powerful and large cells
•Realtime feedback on battery
temperature and state of charge
•Suitable for on-tool battery charging
•Waterproof
•Safe
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo &,7<2)5$1&+2&8&$021*$5(*8/$50((7,1*$*(1'$2FWREHU10500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730),5(3527(&7,21',675,&7%2$5'±&,7<&281&,/+286,1*68&&(6625$*(1&<68&&(6625$*(1&<±38%/,&),1$1&($87+25,7<&/26('6(66,21 75,&20081,7,(65220 305(*8/$50((7,1*6&281&,/&+$0%(56 30The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).&/26('6(66,21± 3075,&20081,7,(6522052//&$// Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo $$11281&(0(172)&/26('6(66,21,7(0 6 %38%/,&&20081,&$7,21621&/26('6(66,21,7(0 6 &&,7<0$1$*(5$11281&(0(176'&21'8&72)&/26('6(66,21'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITY'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY 'CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)'CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY' CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY'CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITY(5(&(66±Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.5(*8/$50((7,1*± 30&281&,/&+$0%(563/('*(2)$//(*,$1&(52//&$// Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo$$0(1'0(176727+($*(1'$%$11281&(0(1735(6(17$7,216%Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.%Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.&38%/,&&20081,&$7,2160HPEHUVRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLODOVRVLWDVWKH)LUH%RDUG+RXVLQJ6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\DQG3XEOLF)LQDQFH$XWKRULW\7KLVLVWKHWLPHDQGSODFHIRUWKHJHQHUDOSXEOLFWRDGGUHVVWKH)LUH3URWHFWLRQ'LVWULFW+RXVLQJ6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\3XEOLF)LQDQFLQJ$XWKRULW\%RDUGDQG&LW\&RXQFLORQDQ\LWHPOLVWHGRUQRWOLVWHGRQWKHDJHQGDState law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.&RPPHQWVDUHWREHOLPLWHGWRILYHPLQXWHVSHULQGLYLGXDORUOHVVDVGHHPHGQHFHVVDU\E\WKH0D\RUGHSHQGLQJXSRQWKHQXPEHURILQGLYLGXDOVGHVLULQJWRVSHDN All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.7KHSXEOLFFRPPXQLFDWLRQVSHULRGZLOOQRWH[FHHGRQHKRXUSULRUWRWKHFRPPHQFHPHQWRIWKHEXVLQHVVSRUWLRQRIWKHDJHQGD During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
&216(17&$/(1'$56
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
' &216(17&$/(1'$5
'Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,
2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.
'Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September
07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for
the Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
(CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and
Authorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
'Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary
McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the
Amount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
'Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 Deep
Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of
$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
' Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,
South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
'Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
'Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
'Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
'Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
'Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
' Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
'Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
'Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
'Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
(&216(17&$/(1'$525',1$1&( 6 6(&21'5($',1*$'237,21
)$'0,1,675$7,9(+($5,1*,7(0 6
)Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
*$'9(57,6('38%/,&+($5,1*6,7(0 6 &,7<),5(',675,&7
*Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
+&,7<0$1$*(5
667$))5(3257 6
,&281&,/%86,1(66
,&281&,/$11281&(0(176
&RPPHQWVWREHOLPLWHGWRWKUHHPLQXWHVSHU&RXQFLO0HPEHU
,,17(5$*(1&<83'$7(6
(8SGDWHE\WKH&LW\&RXQFLOWRWKHFRPPXQLW\RQWKHPHHWLQJVWKDWZHUHDWWHQGHG)
-&,7<$77251(<,7(06
.,'(17,),&$7,212),7(06)251(;70((7,1*
/$'-28510(17
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
&(57,),&$7,21
,/LQGD$7UR\DQ00&&LW\&OHUN6HUYLFHV'LUHFWRURIWKH&LW\RI5DQFKR&XFDPRQJDRUP\GHVLJQHHKHUHE\
FHUWLI\XQGHUSHQDOW\RISHUMXU\WKDWDWUXHDFFXUDWHFRS\RIWKHIRUHJRLQJDJHQGDZDVSRVWHGRQDWOHDVW
WZHQW\IRXU KRXUVSULRUWRWKHPHHWLQJSHU*RYHUQPHQW&RGH DW&LYLF&HQWHU'ULYH5DQFKR
&XFDPRQJD&DOLIRUQLD &XOWXUDO&HQWHU'ULYH5DQFKR&XFDPRQJD&$ DQGRQWKH&LW\
VZHEVLWH
/,1'$$752<$100&
&,7<&/(5.6(59,&(6',5(&725
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 6
10
45
63
65
106
146
149
154
156
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers forthe Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the FederalEmergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; andAuthorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.(CITY/FIRE)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with MaryMcGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in theAmount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 DeepCleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of
Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,
Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman
Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interest
of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Execution
of a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,
Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,
Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)
D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%
Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496
plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project. (CITY)
D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,
Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.
(CITY/ FIRE)
D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 with
Southern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure
fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292
for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)
D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that a
Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red
Hill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and
Not Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)
D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of Employer
Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)
D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 7
159
162
202
204
208
212
214
216
218
226
229
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers forthe Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the FederalEmergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; andAuthorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.(CITY/FIRE)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with MaryMcGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in theAmount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 DeepCleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice ofCompletion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and HellmanAvenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and AuthorizeRelease of Bonds. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interestof a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red HillCountry Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Executionof a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement RehabilitationProject. (CITY)D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.(CITY/ FIRE)D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 withSouthern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructurefund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that aPortion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 RedHill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land andNot Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of EmployerPaid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management AssociationBargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement PlanCovering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021
114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)
D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completion
of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and
Authorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
Funds. (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,
Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)
(CITY)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to
be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021
00315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings
on Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 8
238
240
242
258
---
---
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAOctober 20, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING THE ARTE APARTMENT COMPLEX ARISING OUT OF ALLEGEDVIOLATIONS OF THE PROJECT’S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – CITYD2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECTAND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIORCOURT CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROWROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229012970000;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JON KELLY, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS.; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITYD4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222;NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND SARAHWATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES; REGARDINGPRICE AND TERMS. – CITY D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENTCODE SECTION 54956.9(A); INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, ET AL V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:21CV01656SP. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER022916214; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916222; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913116; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022913131; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPELLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITYD12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916215; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYD13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022929117; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.B2.Presentation of Electric Extrication Tool by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of August 4, 2021, August 18,2021, September 1, 2021, September 15, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September07, 2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers forthe Month of September in the Total Amount of $1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07,2021 Through October 10, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2021 for theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)D5.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of September 30, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D6.Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383 Awarded by the FederalEmergency Management Agency for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; andAuthorization to Appropriate $86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.(CITY/FIRE)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with MaryMcGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in theAmount of $33,640 and Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)D8.Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement with 360 DeepCleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of$200,000 and Authorization to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)D9.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side of East Avenue,South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice ofCompletion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC201701023 as Complete,Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street, Between Amethyst Avenue and HellmanAvenue, Submitted by Steadfast RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and AuthorizeRelease of Bonds. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the Sale of Fee Interestof a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red HillCountry Club Drive Identified as a Portion of APN 020711204 & 020711214 and Executionof a Related Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)D12.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC201800912,Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street,Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC. (CITY)D13.Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of $1,718,302, Plus 10%Contingency for the Fiscal Year 202122 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)D14.Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the amount of $127,496plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement RehabilitationProject. (CITY)D15.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for Maintenance,Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years.(CITY/ FIRE)D16.Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract No. 2021049 withSouthern California Sound Image for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)D17.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructurefund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project. (CITY)D18.Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that aPortion of Real Property Owned by the City Located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 RedHill Country Club Drive and Identified as APN 020711204 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land andNot Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021112) (CITY)D19.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the Value of EmployerPaid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga Management AssociationBargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021113). (CITY)D20.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Improvement PlanCovering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure “I” FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021114 & RESOLUTION NO. 2021115) (CITY)D21.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the Completionof a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, andAuthorization of Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide CapitalInfrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)D22.Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered Venue Operators GrantFunds. (CITY)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTIONF. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)F1.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenueand Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021100)(CITY)G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, tobe Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC202000213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC202000267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), DesignReview (DRC202000202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC202000266), Minor Use Permit (DRC202100315), Development Agreement (DRC202100180) and Certification of Environmental ImpactReport (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildingson Certain Property Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 FeetWest of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th Street; APNS: 022928350 and 51.(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021106, 2021107, 2021108, 2021109, 2021110 & 2021111)(ORDINANCE NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)I. COUNCIL BUSINESSI1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Dylan Merola.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 9
---
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 7
August 4, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, August 4, 2021, in the
Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne
Kennedy. Absent: Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City
Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris,
Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
A1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.
MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)
A2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
A3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
A4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12963 WHITTRAM AVENUE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-14. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY
MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
A5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST
CORNERS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 0229-291-22 AND 0229-291-23.
NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS
SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
Page 10
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 7
A6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE
TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 2
CASES; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED LETTERS FROM TWO ENTITIES THREATENING LITIGATION
IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 982 . THE LETTERS ARE
AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. – CITY
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 6:55 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on August 4, 2021,
in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
Pro Tem Kennedy called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne
Kennedy. Absent: Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney, and Patricia Bravo-Valdez,
Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.
Council Member Spagnolo led the Pledge of Allegiance.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
None.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Chef Eugenio “Geno” Rodriguez in Honor of his
Outstanding Efforts and Continued Service to the Healthy RC C.A.S.A. Cooking Class for Over 10 years.
Management Aide, Joanna Marrufo, shared Chef Eugenio “Geno” Rodriguez’ dedication to the community
showcasing his leadership in the Healthy RC C.A.S.A. Cooking Class. She noted that Chef Rodriguez helped
community members make the healthy choice the easy choice with healthy recipes. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and
Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to Chef Eugenio “Geno” Rodriguez.
B2. Presentation of Rancho Cucamonga’s Ranking – Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially.
Paige Garcia, Management Aide and Annette Mumolo, Senior Community Affairs Coordinator, presented a
PowerPoint sharing that the City of Rancho Cucamonga was recently included as a top city in the U.S. in
MoneyGeek’s 2021 Best Cities for Black Women to Flourish Financially analysis.
Page 11
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 7
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Janet Walton offered a prayer.
Tom Rheiner spoke in support of item H2 and suggested that the City work with local schools to alert parents of the
new Residential Permit Parking District on De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court.
Kelly Soiles and Danielle Frazer representing One & All Church thanked the City for their support and offered to be
a community partner with available resources such as a food distribution program for the community.
Philip Hakopian shared traffic safety concerns and requested increased police presence to enforce traffic safety
laws.
City Manager Gillison referred Mr. Hakopian to speak with the Chief of Police to obtain more information on traffic
enforcement.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,869,868.92
and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California
Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $3,905,174.15 Dated July 12, 2021 Through July 25, 2021.
(CITY/FIRE)
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $341.04 Dated July 12, 2021 Through July 25, 2021.
(CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of Cougar Court, Related to Case
No. DRC2016-00038 and Previously Subdivided Parcels of Land in the Low (L) District in relation to
Parcel Map 16884, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D4. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $15,973 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund
705) for the Comar Inc. Power Upgrade Project. (CITY).
D5. Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors,
LLC (CO18-103) for Fiber Optic Project Management and Design Services for Fiscal Year 2021/22.
(CITY)
D6. Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20301 Located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard Related
to Case No. SUBTPM20301. (CITY).
D7. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located at the Southwest Corner of Arrow Route and
Helms Avenue at 9393 Arrow Route per the Improvement Agreement Related to Case No.
DRC2018-00139, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds.
(CITY).
D8. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2021-00438, Located at 8763 Brilliant
Lane. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-87, 2021-88, 2021-89) (CITY).
D9. Consideration of Reimbursement Payment for Underground Utilities Improvements Related to Case
No. DRC2006-01012 and Authorization of an Appropriation of $76,880. (CITY)
Page 12
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 7
D10. Consideration of the Purchase of Asphalt Materials on an As Needed Basis from Holliday Rock of
Upland, California in an amount Not to Exceed $165,000 for FY 2021/22. (CITY)
D11. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract CO 19-187 with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for
Citywide Tree Maintenance Services During FY 2021/2022 and Authorize the City Manager to Renew
the Contract Annually. (CITY)
D12. Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees
Association Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-081) (CITY).
D13. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Sidepath, Inc. for Data Center Support
Services in the total amount not to exceed $200,000. (CITY)
D14. Consideration to Award Contract to Golden State Construction for the Civic Center COVID and ADA
Improvement Project. (CITY)
D15. Consideration to Approve and Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District for Property Commonly Known as APN
0208-151-24 Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Road,
and Appropriate American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds for the Purchase as Indicated in the Staff
Report. (CITY)
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent
Calendar Items D1 through D15, with Council Member Scott abstaining from item D2 due to her employment
with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
No items.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1. Consideration of Resolutions Denying Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use
Permit DRC2020-00087, and a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-082, 2021-083, 2021-084) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison provided an overview of item F1. City Manager Gillison noted that the item includes the
Resolutions that derived from the City Council’s decision at the July 7, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting. He
noted that at the July 7, 2021 City Council Meeting, Council ultimately decided to deny Minor Design Review
DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, the Council also voted to approve Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 which permits the subdivision of the existing parcel into two new parcels. He
recommended that the City Council adopt resolutions denying Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and
conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Administrative Hearing.
There were no public communications.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Administrative Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo to adopt Resolutions No.
2021-082, 2021-083 and 2021-084, denying Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 and Conditional Use Permit
DRC2020-00087, and Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. Motion carried, 3-1-1. Opposed:
Hutchison, Absent: Mayor Michael.
Page 13
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 7
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. A Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Denial of a Request for a
Conditional Use Permit to Operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage Facility Located at 9910 6th Street in an
Existing Industrial Building within the General Industrial (GI) District—APN:0209- 211-42 and 43
(DRC2021-00213). This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2021-085) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, who presented a PowerPoint presentation
providing the background and overview of the Conditional Use Permit Appeal of the Planning Commission’s
Denial of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage Facility Located at
9910 6th Street in an Existing Industrial Building within the General Industrial (GI) District. Senior Planner
McPherson noted that conducting a discretionary review allows staff and the applicant to consider the context of
a project, its potential impacts on the surrounding properties, and if a project meets the goals and policies of the
general plan. He shared the two primary concerns with the project: 1.) zoning/impacts to surrounding properties
and 2.) inconsistency with General Plan land use/economic development goals and policies. He closed by stating
that the project fails to comply with certain general plan goals and policies related to land use and economic
development and recommended the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s
decision to deny the subject Conditional Use Permit.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Public Hearing.
Matthew Nelson, Gresham Savage Nolan & Tilden, representing the appellant, Brookfield Properties the owner
of 9910 Sixth Street, spoke in opposition of item G1 and stated that the denial of the appeal by the Planning
Director and Planning Commission lacks any reason, accountability or basis in law. He concluded by asking that
the City Council respectfully sustain the appeal.
Adam Schmid, Vice President of Development, Brookfield Properties, spoke in opposition of item G1 and shared
his disagreement with the analysis presented by City staff. He clarified a discrepancy discussed at the Planning
Commission Meeting regarding employment and noted that the total projection for jobs was 70 from which 40
would be new jobs and 30 would be relocated employees. He noted that it was a reduction as they had previously
quoted 97 people would be employed. He concluded by asking that the City Council overturn the Planning
Commission’s Denial of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Operate an Auto and Vehicle Storage Facility
Located at 9910 6th Street.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing.
City Manager Gillison asked staff to respond and address the constant moving number of projected employment
numbers provided by Brookfield Properties.
Senior Planner McPherson noted that the original estimate was 25-30 employees. The subsequent estimated
number of employees at the Planning Commission was then changed to 97 employees and now the number of
employees has changed to 70 employees.
Council discussion ensued regarding diesel trucks, net zero trucks, emissions, truck routes, equity, highest and
best use of properties in the area, economic development opportunities and proximity to local establishments and
impacts to surrounding neighborhoods.
Director of Engineering Services, Jason Welday, clarified the areas un-restricted trucking routes.
City Attorney Markman asked the applicant if they are leasing a parking lot to a specific company that is not open
to the general public and inquired on the primary use of the property.
Page 14
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 7
Adam Schmid, Vice President of Development, Brookfield Properties responded that the company is not open to
the general public and that the company would use limited office space but essentially the company is using the
property to park their fleet.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo to adopt Resolution No.
2021-085, denying the Appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Conditional Use Permit
DRC2020-00439, a request to operate an auto and vehicle storage use within the General Industrial (GI) District
located at 9910 6th Street; and making findings in support thereof – APN: 0209-211-42 And 43. (DRC2021-
00213).Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael.
G2. Continued Public Hearing for Consideration of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning
Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Car Wash – A Request for General
Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One
Project-Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to
General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non-Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land
(0208-291-01 and 0208-291-02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential
District Related to a Proposed Car Wash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on
the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-045) (CITY) (Continued from June 2, 2021 City
Council Meeting)
City Manager Gillison noted the receipt of a letter from Paige Gosney from Gresham Savage Nolan & Tilden, law
firm representing Arbor Express Auto Wash, requesting continuance of the public hearing. He noted that the date
of November 3, 2021 is agreeable by the applicant to continue the hearing date. Correspondence received was
provided to the City Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Public Hearing.
Elliot Rothman requested the City Council consider continuing the Public Hearing to the Regular Meeting of
November 17, 2021 instead of the proposed November 3, 2021 date.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to continue the Public
Hearing item to the Regular City Council Meeting on November 17, 2021 at 7:00PM in the Council Chambers,
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael.
H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Analysis of the Current State of Parking for the Area of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road.
(CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Associate Engineer, Baldwin Ngai, who presented a PowerPoint
presentation providing an analysis of the current state of parking for the area of Foothill Boulevard and San
Bernardino Road. He concluded by stating that staff is not recommending any changes to the existing
parking, but if a development for a new restaurant or office building moves forward with pulling permits, staff
can evaluate options for additional parking capacity.
Council Member Scott thanked staff for conducting the parking study for the area of Foothill Boulevard and
San Bernardino Road.
Page 15
DRAFT
August 4, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 7
H2. Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on De Anza Drive,
Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2021-086) (CITY).
City Manager Gillison introduced Associate Engineer, Baldwin Ngai and Assistant Engineer, Chris Ellis, who
presented a PowerPoint providing background and overview of the proposed Residential Permit Parking District
on De Anza Drive, Emery Place, Meyers Drive, and Danner Court. Associate Engineer Ngai noted that the
proposed permit parking district is anticipated to alleviate impacts to the neighborhood and protect the
community’s quality of life.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to adopt Resolution
No. 2021-086, establishing the “De Anza, et al.” residential permit parking district on De Anza Drive, Emery Place,
Meyers Drive, and Danner Court. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual
Business Meeting. (CITY)
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to appoint Mayor Pro
Tem Kennedy as Voting Delegate and Council Member Scott as Alternate for the League of California Cities (Cal
Cities) Annual Business Meeting. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael.
I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
None.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
None.
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
None.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy adjourned the meeting at 8:41 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Approved:
Page 16
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 8
August 18, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, August 18, 2021, in
the Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City
Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris,
Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
(RCCEA), TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES AND FIRE MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL
USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS
LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)
D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S
INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS
PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS;
REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)
Page 17
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 8
D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12963 WHITTRAM
AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 022916214. NEGOTIATING PARTIES,
JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE
AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS
SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND
SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AND FURTHER
IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
022929122 AND 022929123. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO
NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY
NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT
EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF
SECTION 54956.9: 2 CASES; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED LETTERS FROM TWO ENTITIES
THREATENING LITIGATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
982 . THE LETTERS ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. –
CITY
D8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST
CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBER 020833140; AND 020833147; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY
MANAGER AND MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND CHRIS HYUN, JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP
REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 6:40 p.m.
Page 18
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 8
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on August 18, 2021,
in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC,
Director of City Clerk Services.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Director of City Clerk Services, Linda Troyan, announced that item B4 on the agenda would be postponed to
a future City Council Meeting.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Sympathy in Memory of John Lyons, Longtime Community Member.
Mayor Michael announced that at the conclusion of the City Council Meeting, the City Council would have a
moment of silence and adjourn the meeting in memory of John Lyons, longtime community member. Mayor
Michael noted that John Lyons was an original Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board Member dating
back to the late 70’s and 80’s. He added that John Lyons was an enthusiastic supporter of the City for many
decades and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. The City and City Council expresses our heartfelt condolences
to the Lyons family. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Certificate of Sympathy to the
Lyons family.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Len Tavernetti, Service Officer, Chapter #2929, Military Order of the
Purple Heart, Designating Rancho Cucamonga as a Purple Heart City.
Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to Len Tavernetti, Service Officer,
Chapter #2929, Military Order of the Purple Heart, Designating Rancho Cucamonga as a Purple Heart City.
B3. Recognizing Arrowhead Credit Union’s ArrowHeart Foundation for their Continued Support of our Rancho
Cucamonga Station and the Sheriff’s Department for Providing Basic Essentials to our Homeless
Population.
Rancho Cucamonga Chief of Police, Ernie Perez, expressed his gratitude to the ArrowHeart Foundation for their
support in providing essential items for the community. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented
a Certificate of Recognition to the ArrowHeart Foundation.
B4. Recognizing Sheriff’s Services Specialist Gloria Huerta for 16 years of Service with Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department. (Promoted to Public Information Officer for the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s
Department).
Mayor Michael announced that item B4 would be presented at a future City Council Meeting.
Page 19
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 8
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Tanner Marston thanked the City Council and expressed his concerns with the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Project and the development of Amazon warehouses in Rancho Cucamonga.
Eight (8) speakers representing Rebels Rugby: Rachel Toalepai, Erik Jones, Robert Verdi, Stacey Barnier, Kennedy
Bales, Piusaati Satela, Kris Anderson and Cole Seanoa, requested that the City Council support diversity in sports
and allocate a lighted field for rugby.
Two (2) speakers: Kathi Pryor and Teresa Martinez, spoke about pickleball and the limited amount of pickleball fields
available in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. They requested that the City Council consider converting existing tennis
courts into pickleball courts or build new pickleball courts to accommodate the growing interest in the City. Six (6)
emails from: Beth Henry, Marian Sherman, Henry Corrado, Joe and Patty Dagata, Marilyn Griffin and Emily Wang,
were provided by Kathi Pryor in support of additional pickleball courts.
Stephanie Lyons asked the City Council to re-evaluate Central Park for different sport uses.
City Manager Gillison directed Rebels Rugby to speak with Deputy City Manager, Elisa Cox, for potential options of
fields to consider for rugby use. Regarding pickleball, he informed that the City currently has an assessment survey
to understand community demands and new trends. He suggested that community members participate in the
Recreation Needs Assessment Survey.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,640,419.43 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $10,780,160.75 Dated July 12, 2021
Through August 08, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of July in
the Total Amount of $8,843,331.43. (CITY/FIRE)
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $11,417.78 Dated July 12, 2021 Through August 08,
2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of July 31, 2021 for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Flashing Yellow Arrow Project (CO# 2020- 054).
(CITY)
D5. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to Parcel Map No. 19855 Located at the 9611
Hillside Road on the South Side of Hillside Road and West of Archibald Avenue as Complete,
Submitted by Monte Vista Assets, Inc., File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds.
(CITY)
D6. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC2018-00711 as Complete, Located at
the 9063 Center Avenue, on the Northeast Corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street, Submitted by
Center Avenue Industrial, LLC, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)
D7. Consideration of the Purchase of Itron Smart Meters, Current Transformers, and Test Switches from
McAvoy and Markham Engineering and Sales in the Amount of $380,000 and an Appropriation in the
Amount of $99,800. (CITY)
Page 20
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 8
D8. Consideration to Accept and Allocate $73,330 Award by the California State Library for a Library of
Things Collection. (CITY)
D9. Consideration of the Use of a California State Contract #1-18-23-10D, Awarded to Winner Chevrolet
/ Elk Grove Auto Group, of Elk Grove, California, for the Purchase of Two (2) Electric Vehicle (EV)
Chevy Bolts in the amount of $70,000.00. (CITY)
D10. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2021-00244 - GROCERY OUTLET - A request for a
Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) Determination for Alcoholic Beverage Sales for Off-Site
Consumption (Type-20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine) for a Grocery Store (Grocery Outlet) Located in the
Community Commercial (CC) District and the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan at 9040 Foothill Boulevard – APN: 0208-101-20. This Project is Categorically
Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption – Existing Facilities). (CITY)
D11. Consideration of a Resolution Designating the City Manager and the Police Chief as the Public
Officials Authorized to Temporarily Close Streets for Celebrations, Parades, Local Special Events,
and Other Purposes Pursuant to Vehicle Code Section 21101(e). (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-091)
(CITY)
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve Consent
Calendar Items D1 through D11, with Council Member Scott abstaining from item D2 due to her employment
with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 5-0.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
None.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
None.
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the
Proposed Annexation of Territory (Owner: Mark Allen Hartwig, APN: 0201-043- 55, Annexation No.
88-21-1) Located at 10175 Snowdrop Road into an Existing Community Facilities District, Calling a
Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special Taxes to the Qualified Electors.
(RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-023) (FIRE)
City Manager Gillison introduced Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager and Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of
Finance, who provided a verbal report for item G1. Deputy Director of Finance Daniels, noted that the property
owner, Mark Allen Hartwig, fully supports the annexation and levy of special taxes. He concluded by
recommending that the Fire Protection District Board adopt a resolution making determinations and authorizing
the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Owner:
Mark Allen Hartwig, APN: 0201-043-55, Annexation No. 88-21-1) to existing Community Facilities District No.
88-1 (“CFD No. 88-1”) and calling a special election for such purpose.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
No public communications were made.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Page 21
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 8
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Resolution No. FD
2021-023, authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be
annexed (Owner: Mark Allen Hartwig, APN: 0201-043-55, Annexation No. 88-21-1) to existing Community
Facilities District No. 88-1 (“CFD No. 88-1”) and calling a special election for such purpose. Motion carried 5-0.
G2. Public Hearing for the Approval of the Draft Substantial Amendment to the 17-18 and 20-21 Annual Action
Plans for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, reported that given the urgency to expend
prior year funds, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is amending the 2017-2018 Action Plan by cancelling the
Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot activity. This activity has a budget of $459,000 and is comprised of the following
prior year resources: $276,299.11 (from FY2014), $132,700.89 (from FY15), and $50,000 (from FY17). He
informed that by cancelling the activity, the City is now able to reprogram these funds towards projects where the
funds can be drawn. As such, all prior year funds will be reprogrammed towards existing activities in the 2020-
2021 Action Plan. He concluded by recommending that the City Council approve the Draft Substantial
Amendment to the 17-18 and 20-21 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
No public communications were made.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Council Member Hutchison asked what would happen to the budgeted amount for the Etiwanda Pacific Electric
Depot project if not reallocated and if there would be an opportunity in the future to restore the Etiwanda Pacific
Electric Depot.
Management Analyst Nunez responded that the funds would not be available to the City if not reallocated.
City Manager Gillison informed that the City had an RFP process in the past that did not result in a successful
outcome. He noted that the City is currently working on having the property as well as the adjacent SBCTA
property appraised with the goal of beginning a new RFP process to rehabilitate and restore the Etiwanda Pacific
Electric Depot. He noted that the City has not given up on the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot and that the City
has stabilized the condition of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the Draft
Substantial Amendment to the 17-18 and 20-21 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program. Motion carried 5-0.
H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring Results of a Special Election in Community
Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-21-1, and Ordering the Annexation of Such Property
Located at 10175 Snowdrop Road in Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (Owner: Mark Allen
Hartwig, APN: 0201-043-55). (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-024) (FIRE)
City Manager Gillison introduced Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager and Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of
Finance, who provided a verbal Report for item H1. Deputy Director of Finance Daniels informed that the
landowner casted their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexation Territory.
He noted that adoption of Resolution No. FD 2021-024 constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring
the results of the election and the annexation of the Annexation Territory to Community Facilities District No.
88-1 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien.
Page 22
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 8
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. FD
2021-024, declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No.
88-21-1, and ordering the Annexation of such property located at 10175 Snowdrop Road in Community Facilities
District No. 88-1. Motion carried 5-0.
H2. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Local Hazard Mitigation
Plan. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-090) (FIRE/CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Joseph Ramos, Emergency Management Coordinator, who provided a
PowerPoint presentation on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No.
2021-090, adopting the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Motion carried 5-0.
H3. Consideration of a City Policy Pertaining to Early Feedback on General Plan Amendments, Planned
Community, Master Plan and Specific Plan Amendments, and Development Code Amendments.
(CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager, who provided a PowerPoint presentation
of a City Policy pertaining to early feedback on General Plan Amendments, Planned Community, Master
Plan and Specific Plan Amendments, and Development Code Amendments. Deputy City Manager Burris
informed that under the new process the Council would provide feedback on proposed legislative
amendment, the applicant can decide whether to pursue the legislative amendment, and the other
entitlements for the applicant’s proposed project, with the Council’s preliminary policy considerations in mind.
He noted that the opportunity provides the applicant with more information about whether the proposed
project is likely to be successful after the application has been processed by staff. Deputy City Manager
Burris concluded by recommending that the City Council adopt the policy providing early Council feedback
on General Plan amendments, Specific Plan, Planned Community, Master Plan Amendments, or
Development Code Amendments.
Council discussion ensued regarding foundational policy changes, benefits of feedback in the early stages
of proposed projects, mis-construing feedback for approvals or denials, importance of meeting minutes
details, providing support for the Planning Commission and streamlining the process for future applicants.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to receive, file and adopt
the Legislative Changes Review Policy providing early Council feedback on General Plan Amendments, Specific
Plan, Planned Community, Master Plan Amendments, or Development Code Amendments. Motion carried 5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
None.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
None.
Page 23
DRAFT
August 18, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 8 of 8
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested staff to report on the “Ho Ho” Parade at a September meeting to
decide if the City Council would consider having a Holiday Parade in 2021.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting in Memory of John Lyons, Longtime Community Member, at 8:45
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Approved:
Page 24
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 7
September 1, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, September 1, 2021, in
the Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L.
Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Sam Spagnolo.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City
Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris,
Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT
SERVICES AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.
MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)
D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
Page 25
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 7
D5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE
TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1
CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED ONE LETTER FROM ONE ENTITY THREATENING LITIGATION
IN CONNECTION WITH A GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT. THE
LETTER IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. – CITY
D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CHERRY AVENUE
JUST NORTH OF THE I-15 FREEWAY, IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER DD004461-01-03;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS);
REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on September 1,
2021, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L.
Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Sam Spagnolo.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC,
Director of City Clerk Services.
Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
None.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Michael announced that at the conclusion of the City Council Meeting, the City Council would have a
moment of silence and adjourn the meeting in honor of the 13 fallen service members, who made the ultimate
sacrifice while providing security at the Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan on Thursday, August 26, 2021. Mayor
Michael informed that the City of Rancho Cucamonga plans to honor and remember Lance Cpl. Merola at a
future City Council meeting and plans to proudly display an Armed Forces banner in his name, embellished with
the gold star, reserved for those who have made the ultimate sacrifice while serving our Nation. He invited the
community to honor and remember Lance Corporal Dylan Merola on Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 7:00 p.m.
at Central Park’s Freedom Courtyard. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council expressed their
condolences for the 13 fallen service members.
Page 26
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 7
B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition Presented to John and Brenda Neilon for their Dedication and
Commitment to the Community.
Mayor Michael introduced John and Brenda Neilon, co-founders of Enable Music, and dedicated Los Osos High
School seniors who have been playing music to help members of the RC Community. Mayor Michael and
Members of the City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to John and Brenda Neilon for their dedication
and commitment to the community.
B2. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Sheriff’s Services Specialist Gloria Huerta for 16
Years of Service with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. (Promoted to Public Information Officer
for the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department).
Rancho Cucamonga Chief of Police, Ernie Perez, thanked Gloria Huerta for her dedicated 16 Years of Service
with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and congratulated Ms. Huerta in her new role of Public
Information Officer for the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. Mayor Michael and Members of the City
Council presented a Certificate of Recognition to Gloria Huerta.
B3. Presentation of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for the City’s 2020 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Tamara Oatman, Finance Director, and Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of Finance, shared their recent achievement
of being awarded with a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and noted that this is the 33rd year of receiving the award. Mayor Michael and
Members of the City Council congratulated the Rancho Cucamonga Finance Department on the honorable award
received.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Janet Walton invited the community to a free event, “Route 66 Franklin Graham God Loves You Tour” on October
2, 2021 and offered a prayer.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 7, 2021.
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,861,997.35
and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (No Checks Issued to Southern California
Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $4,109,922.24 Dated August 09, 2021 Through August 22,
2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Cooperative Contract Through Sourcewell Awarded to Genuine
Parts Company DBA Napa Auto Parts to Furnish Aftermarket Vehicle Parts and Supplies, Equipment,
Products, or Services for the Remainder of Fiscal Year 2021/2022, and Authorize the Use of Future
Renewals as Awarded Through Sourcewell, Funded by Various Citywide Account Numbers in
Accordance with the Adopted Fiscal Year Budgets. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Award a Contract to AMG & Associates, Inc. in the Amount of $16,389,050, Plus a
Project Contingency of $945,220, and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $2,834,270
for the Design Build of Fire Station 178. (CITY/FIRE)
D5. Consideration of the Purchase of Electrical Parts in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000. (CITY/FIRE)
Page 27
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 7
D6. Consideration of Amendment No. 6 to Contract CO 17-143 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Park
Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $652,110 (City) and
$73,880 (Fire). (CITY/FIRE)
D7. Consideration of a Resolution Waiving the Collection of Certain Inspection, Permit, and Special
Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2021-22. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-027) (FIRE)
D8. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $19,220 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705)
for the Fire Station 3 - SCE Exit to RCMU Project. (CITY)
D9. Consideration to Continue the Existing Local Emergency Due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Pandemic. (CITY)
D10. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lisa Wise Consulting
(CO# 19-196) for Development Code Consulting Services in the Amount of $155,630 and
Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $155,630 from the Community Development
Technical Services Fund. (CITY)
D11. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract CO 2020-030 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMD
4R Parkway Paseo and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to
Exceed $486,890. (CITY)
D12. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract CO 2020-029 with Landscape West Management
Services, Inc. for LMD 2 Parkway Paseo and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in
an Amount Not to Exceed $1,200,000. (CITY)
D13. Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to Contract CO 18-030 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance of LMDs 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 Parkways, Paseos, and Medians in
an Amount Not to Exceed $1,009,780. (CITY)
D14. Consideration of Amendment No. 4 to Contract CO 16-262 with BrightView Landscape Services for
Landscape, Irrigation, and Parks Maintenance for PD-85 Parks in an Amount Not to Exceed $266,990.
(CITY)
D15. Consideration of Amendment 4 to Contract CO 17-140 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Landscape
and Irrigation Maintenance on Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Medians in an Amount Not to
Exceed $266,470. (CITY)
D16. Consideration of Amendment No. 5 to Contract CO 17-142 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance on General Fund and LMD 3B Parkways in an Amount Not to
Exceed $875,680. (CITY)
D17. Consideration of Amendment No. 5 to Contract CO 16-148 with BrightView Landscape Services for
Landscape, Irrigation, and Parks Maintenance for Landscape Maintenance District 1 Parks in an
Amount Not to Exceed $294,150. (CITY)
D18. Consideration of Amendment No. 11 to Contract CO 2012-009 with BrightView Landscape Services
for Maintenance of Parkway, Paseo, and Median Landscapes within Landscape Maintenance Districts
1 and 5 in an Amount Not to Exceed $273,870. (CITY)
D19. Consideration of a Contract with Alfaro Communication Construction, Inc., in an Amount of $222,780
Plus 10% Contingency, Issuance of a Purchase Order to Onward Engineering for On- Call
Construction Inspection Services, and Appropriations from the MSRC Air Pollution Reduction and
AB2766 Air Quality Improvement Funds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project. (CITY)
Page 28
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 7
D20. Consideration of Approval and Execution of an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) Between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and Chris Hyun for Property Generally Located on the Northwest Corner
of Civic Center Drive and Haven Avenue. (CITY)
D21. Consideration to Accept Animal Care & Adoption Center - Roof Maintenance & Repair Project as
Complete, file a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds for Contract No. 2021-078.
(CITY)
D22. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submission of a Grant Application for the Rubberized
Pavement Program from CalRecycle. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-094) (CITY)
D23. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Attestation of Veracity for the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility 2020 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2021-095) (CITY)
D24. Consideration of a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2021-084 Approving SUBTPM20164 and
Approving a Revised Resolution, and Conditions, which Replaces and Supersedes Resolution
2021-084. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-093) (CITY)
One (1) letter in opposition to item D20 was received from Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve Consent
Calendar Items D1 through D24. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Spagnolo.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
None.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
None.
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. Consideration of Resolution Nos. 2021-096 and 2021-097 and Consideration of First Reading of
Ordinance Nos. 983, 984 and 985, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending, 1)
The 2010 General Plan to Amend the Land Use Element to Add Three New Zoning Designations Known
as City Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, and Redesignate 62 Parcels from Their
Existing Land Use Designations to One of the New Land Use Designations. (DRC2021- 00281), 2) Title
17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts Known as City
Center, City Corridor Moderate and City Corridor High, Establish Development Standards and Permitted
Uses for Each New Zoning District, and Remove 8 Parcels from the Haven Avenue Overlay and 1 Parcel
from the Industrial Commercial Overlay. (DRC2021- 00282), 3) A Zoning Map Amendment to Rezone 41
of the 62 Parcels Within the City to One of the Three New Zoning Districts. (DRC2021-00283), 4) An
Amendment to the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 of the 62 Parcels to the New Urban
Corridor Zoning Designation and Establish Development Standards for the Urban Corridor Zoning
District. (DRC2021-00284), 5) An Amendment to the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone 6 of the 62
Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning Designation and Establish Development
Standards for the Urban Center Zoning District. (DRC2021-00285), and 6) An Amendment to the Town
Square Master Plan to Rezone 2 of the 62 Parcels Within the Master Plan to the New Urban Center
Zoning Designation and Establish Development Standards for the Urban Center Zoning District.
(DRC2021- 00286). An Addendum to the 2010 General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report
Page 29
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 7
(SCH #2000061027) Has Been Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-096 & 2021-097)
(ORDINANCE NOS. 983, 984 & 985) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II, who provided a PowerPoint
presentation outlining the proposed General Plan Amendments. Management Analyst Nakamura informed that
the City is proposing to amend the 2010 General Plan, Development Code and related special planning
documents to adopt new General Plan land use and zoning designations for selected parcels from the vacant
parcel inventory to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021.
She informed that staff proposes amending Chapter 2 (Land Use) of the 2010 General Plan to add three new
mixed use general plan designations to support potential future development of additional housing units along
key corridors, consistent with the community vision laid out in the new General Plan, along with conforming
changes to the remainder of the chapter to ensure internal consistency. She informed that all necessary land use
maps, tables and text will be amended to include the new designations: City Center, City Corridor Moderate and
City Corridor High.
Staff noted the receipt of two (2) letters in support to item G1: one (1) from Gilman Bishop, Bishop Ventures, LLC
and one (1) from Bret Bernard, Milan Capital Management. Staff noted a revision to Ordinance No. 983, the
revision included a change to paragraph 7 of the Ordinance to properly note the eight (8) parcels being removed
from the Haven Avenue Overlay (only 4 of 8 were originally listed) and 1 parcel was removed from the Industrial
Commercial Overlay. Correspondence received and Amended Ordinance No. 983 was provided to the City
Council.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
Mike Pallman, Vineyard Hill, LLC, spoke in opposition of item G1 stating that two(2) of his parcels would be
affected upon City Council’s approval due to density requirements under the new designations for property located
at the corner of Foothill Blvd. and Vineyard Ave.
Bret Bernard, Milan Capital Management, thanked staff and spoke in support of item G1 and the concept of
mixed-use.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Council discussion ensued regarding parcels being amended, addressing housing element issues, state
guidelines/ requirements, mixed-use designation benefits, projects affected by proposed General Plan
Amendments, impacts to the community, density ranges and the willingness to work with applicants.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to Adopt Resolution
Nos. 2021-096, 2021-097 and Introduce First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 983, 984 and 985 by titles only and
waive further readings.
Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 983, 984 and 985.
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Kennedy, to Adopt Resolution Nos. 2021-096, 2021-097 and Introduce First Reading of Ordinance Nos. 983,
984 and 985 by titles only and waive further readings. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member
Spagnolo.
H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S)
None.
Page 30
DRAFT
September 1, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 7
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Scott congratulated Northtown Housing for recently being recognized as a Non-Profit
Organization of Distinction by Assembly Member James C. Ramos who represents the residents of the
40th District in the California State Assembly.
Mayor Michael reported on a recent event hosted by HealthyRC, called Community Paint Day, where
artists and volunteers spray painted visions of hope, love and dreams mural on the sidewalk’s located at
the corner of Ninth St. and Baker Ave. near Los Amigos Elementary School.
I2.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
None.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
None.
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
City Manager Gillison informed that the City was a recipient of a large piece of steel that framed windows
of one of the World Trade Center buildings in New York. He noted that the large piece of steel has been
stored for years and that the City Council provided direction at an earlier Special City Council Meeting to
bring an item to a future Regular City Council meeting to move forward with building a 911 Memorial at
Fire Station 8 which is currently under design.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting in honor of the 13 fallen service members, who made the ultimate
sacrifice while providing security at the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan on
Thursday, August 26, 2021, the meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Approved:
Page 31
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 10
September 15, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, September 15, 2021,
in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City
Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris,
Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT
SERVICES AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.
MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)
D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
Page 32
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 10
D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SAN
SEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228-044-24; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENT
EASEMENT FOR MULTI-USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITY
D6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION
PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY-SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS AT
THE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITY
D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,
FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
0229-162-14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,
PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR
TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
D8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-23; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.
NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
D9. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-22; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.
NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH
ABOVE. – CITY
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 6:37 p.m.
Page 33
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 10
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on September 15,
2021, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC,
Director of City Clerk Services.
Council Member Spagnolo led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Michael announced that the first Public Hearing on Redistricting would be heard at tonight’s meeting.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Director of City Clerk Services, Linda Troyan, announced that there would be an additional presentation of a
Commemorative Plaque for the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot, item B4.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian
and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.
Mayor Michael introduced Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.
Delaney Spaulding who shared her Olympic Journey at the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games and her Silver Medal
awarded to her for the softball competition in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. Mayor Michael and Members of
the City Council presented a Certificate of Recognition to Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian.
B2. Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston,
Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service to the Rancho
Cucamonga Public Library.
Library Director, Julie Sowles, shared accomplishments and contributions of Library Board/ Foundation Members
to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented
Proclamations to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library
Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for their service and commitment to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.
B3. Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month.
City Manager’s Office Management Aide, Joanna Marrufo, shared available resources at
www.cityofrc.us/mentalhealth for mental health information and tips to recognize the signs to help prevent suicide.
She announced an upcoming virtual workshop, “Being Selfish is Selfless” on October 6, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. Mayor
Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to HealthyRC, proclaiming the month of
September as Suicide Prevention Month.
Page 34
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 10
Mayor Michael announced the addition of a presentation of a Commemorative Plaque for the Etiwanda Depot.
B4. Presentation of a Commemorative Plaque for the Etiwanda Depot from the Friends of the Pacific Electric
Trail and Native Sons of the Golden West.
Dennis Jones, President of Friends of The Pacific Electric Trail, Victoria Jones, Community Outreach Director of
Friends of The Pacific Electric Trail, and Joe Castillo Member of Native Sons of the Golden West, shared a
PowerPoint presentation showcasing images of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot and Trail. Mayor Michael and
Members of the City Council were presented with a Commemorative Plaque for the Etiwanda Depot from the
Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail and Native Sons of the Golden West.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Janet Walton recited a story titled “City on a Hill” and offered a prayer.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of
September 1, 2021.
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021
Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through
September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage
Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the
Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY)
D5. Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)
D6. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal
Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)
D7. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018-00430, Located East
of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY)
D8. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021-054. (CITY)
D9. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various
Locations, Contract No. 2021-053. (CITY)
D10. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the
Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case
No. DRC2017-00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds.
(CITY)
Page 35
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 10
D11. Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-099) (CITY)
D12. Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees
Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic
Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105) (CITY)
D13. Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements,
Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos.
1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020-00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop
Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-102), (RESOLUTION NO.
2021-103) (CITY)
D14. Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021-009, 2021-010, and
2021-011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021-029, FD 2021-030 AND FD 2021-031) (FIRE)
D15. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part-Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION
NO. 2021-104) (CITY)
D16. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part-Time Employee
Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-028). (FIRE)
D17. Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG-Rancho
Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management,
Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and
Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY)
D18. Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18-121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional
Website Development. (CITY) One (1) letter in opposition to item D20 was received from Mitchell M.
Tsai, Attorney for Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters.
Mayor Michael pulled item D17 and asked staff to report further on item D17.
Mayor Michael questioned if SMG Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC would provide marketing
services allowing City staff to work on community events and programming.
Community Services Deputy Director Distelrath, confirmed that based on the information provided by SMG
Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC, they would be responsible for marketing available spaces
at the Victoria Garden’s Cultural Center, allowing staff more time to focus on providing community events and
programming.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent
Calendar Items D1 through D18, with the exception of item D17 and Council Member Scott abstaining on item
D3, due to her employment with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 5-0.
City Manager, John Gillison introduced Katie Distelrath, Community Services Deputy Director, who reported
on item D17. She shared the background and noted that in May of 2019, the City entered into a 5-year
agreement SMG-Premier for catering and concession services at Victoria Garden’s Cultural Center, Lewis
Family Playhouse and bar service at Paul A. Biane Library.
Page 36
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 10
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to approve Consent
Calendar Item D17. Motion carried, 5-0.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
Ordinance No. 983
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code
Amendment DRC2021-00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020-1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030-1, and
Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and
Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting
Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an
Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof
Ordinance No. 984
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned
Community Amendment DRC2021-00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13
Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in
Support Thereof
Ordinance No. 985
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned
Community Amendment DRC2021-00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels
Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General
Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and
Making Findings in Support Thereof
MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Ordinance
Nos. 983, 984 and 985 by titles only and waive full readings.
Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 983, 984 and 985.
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Scott,
to adopt Ordinance Nos. 983, 984 and 985, by titles only and waive full readings. Motion carried 5-0.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
None.
Mayor Michael announced in order to adhere to 8:00 p.m. time certain requirement for the Re-districting
Public Hearing, item G3 would be heard next, followed by the Re-districting Public Hearing.
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G3. Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst
Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue
and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/ City Engineer and Baldwin
Ngai, Associate Engineer, who provided a PowerPoint presentation on a proposed Residential Permit Parking
District. Staff recommended the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2021-100 to establish the “Estacia Street, et
Page 37
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 10
al.” residential permit parking district on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen
Street and Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue; and
waive fees for the first issuance of permits for the proposed residential permit parking district.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
Kevin Van Lierde spoke on parking issues, property values and suggested that Arte Apartments partner or
negotiate a parking agreement with Kick Back Jack’s to provide overflow parking for Arte Apartment residents.
Seven (7) public communications were made in opposition to item G3 by David VanGorden, Traci Swanson,
Robert Ogburn, Albert Ortiz, Ashley Camacho, Pedro Esquivel and Dan Daniel. Speakers expressed opposition
to the proposed Residential Permit Parking District and shared concerns of insufficient options to solve the
overflow parking caused by Arte apartments, depreciating property values, neighborhood nuisances caused by
the development of Arte apartments, 72-hour parking restrictions, traffic safety concerns, accountability on Arte
Apartment’s behalf, parking permit costs and inconveniences caused by permit parking districts to homeowners
and guests.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Engineering Services Director Welday addressed public comments and noted that the City has been in
communication with Arte Apartments regarding parking options. He spoke on city-wide 72-hour parking
restrictions and addressed traffic concerns.
Assistant City Attorney Ghirelli spoke on the City’s ability to enforce the conditions of approval that were placed
on the Arte project, such as Arte being required to comply with a Parking Management Plan. He noted that if Arte
is not maximizing and using their parking spaces for resident parking the City could impose a Public Nuisance
action against them to enforce the condition of approval. He noted that any violation of a Condition of Approval
constitutes a public nuisance. He stated that staff is monitoring to make sure Arte Apartments is complying.
City Manager Gillison spoke on different options and or remedies that Arte could consider to alleviate the overflow
parking issue associated with Arte apartments. He spoke on market changes and trends with apartment rentals
having a larger number of occupants per apartment due to the rising cost of living in California.
Council discussion ensued regarding concerns shared by residents affected by the proposed Permit Parking
District, remedy options, compliance with the Parking Management Plan, Condition of Approval for Arte
apartments, request for City staff to be included in the inspections of Arte apartments and the lack of oversight
and accountability on Arte’s behalf.
Assistant City Attorney Ghirelli stated that parking on a public street is legal and that the most effective tool to
remove vehicles would be by implementing a Permit Parking District but there are other remedies for the City to
apply pressure for Arte to find alternative arrangements to alleviate the overflow parking issue on site.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy suggested that the item be continued to a future City Council meeting to allow staff to
explore other alternative remedies and work with Arte apartments to find a solution.
Mayor Michael noted that not adopting the Permit Parking District may prolong the current overflow parking issue
associated with Arte apartments but that he would like Arte apartments to be accountable and solve the parking
issues in the neighborhood.
City Manager Gillison recommended the item be brought back by the second meeting in October with a report
and allow staff to work with Arte and explore remedies.
Council Member Scott requested Arte’s presence at the Regular Meeting of October 20, 2021.
Page 38
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 8 of 10
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to bring back the item as an
Administrative Hearing at the Regular Meeting of October 20, 2021 in Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730. Motion carried, 5-0.
G1. 8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN PUBLIC HEARING #1 - Consideration of City Council Election District
Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria
to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries and Receiving Public Input on
Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/ Administrative Services and Todd Tatum
from National Demographics Corporation, who provided a PowerPoint presentation introducing the City’s 2021
Redistricting process. Mr. Tatum shared the Redistricting Process timeline, criteria for cities and state law
requirements, redistricting principles, demographic summary of existing districts and how neighborhoods are
defined. He concluded by encouraging the public to participate in the mapping process and submit maps using
tools available at drawrc.org.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
There were no public communications.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy noted the additional material information provided to Council on the dais consisting of
two (2) emails: one (1) from Don Horvatich and one (1) from Kim Earl regarding the City’s re-districting process
and stated that she is hopeful that they were watching the meeting to witness the City’s public engagement
process as the City is actively seeking the community’s input to make decisions that are reflective of what is in
the best interest of the community.
Mayor Michael announced that no action will be taken at the first Redistricting Public Hearing and that Public
Hearing No. 02 will take place on November 3, 2021 at 8:00 p.m. time certain in the Council Chambers. He invited
the community to submit comments and review documents at www.drawrc.org.
G2. Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020- 2021
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, who provided a PowerPoint presentation
providing an overview of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020- 2021
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER).
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
There were no public communications.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation
Report (CAPER); determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines and authorize the City Manager or their designee to
submit Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Motion carried, 5-0.
Page 39
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 9 of 10
H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day.
(RESOLUTION NO 2021-098) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Deborah Allen, Management Aide, who provided a PowerPoint
presentation on the California Clean Air Day pledge, a project of the Coalition for Clean Air.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, adopt Resolution No. 2021-
098, proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. Motion carried, 5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Katie Distelrath, Community Services Deputy Director, who provided a PowerPoint
presentation on the history of holiday parades in prior years and current challenges in holding a holiday parade in
the 2021 holiday season. Deputy Director Distelrath introduced a modified Santa Tour Concept where the
Community Services Department would facilitate 2-3 block parties per night, mid-week, over 4-5 nights in
December. She calculated the approximate cost of the 4-5 night event to be $15,000-$20,000 which included the
cost of part-time staff and supplies. She noted that budget appropriation would be required, and a decision would
need to be made to allow for planning and resource allocation for December.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy thanked staff for providing options and deferred to her City Council colleagues for input
and noted that funds for a Holiday Parade or Santa Tour were not budgeted for this fiscal year. She recommended
the City Council consider including Santa Tour Activities in the next fiscal year budget.
Mayor Michael concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy’s suggestion to revisit the item for consideration in next
year’s Fiscal year budget for the 2022 Holiday Season.
I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
None.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
Assistant City Attorney Ghirelli announced that during Closed Session the City Council authorized the initiation of
litigation on a case involving RJM Design Group, Tovey Schultz Construction, Inc. and other parties arising out of
alleged design and construction defects at the RC Sports Center.
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
None.
Page 40
DRAFT
September 15, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 10 of 10
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael announced that the October 6, 2021 Regular Meetings have been cancelled and that the next
Regular City Council Meetings will take place on Wednesday, October 20, 2021.
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 9:47 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Approved:
Page 41
DRAFT
September 8, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 2
September 8, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, September 8, 2021, in the
Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
Michael called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services;
Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Community and
Economic Development; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the pledge of allegiance.
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
James Bank, thanked the City for providing different options for the development of the Regina Winery site. He
noted that two of the proposed options had little to do with the City’s history and that the micro housing within
the proposed developments takes away historic preservation. He shared his preference for the proposed
development project submitted by Cucamonga Valley Winery Resort (CVWR) which included a full winery that
would promote historic preservation and provide long range benefits for the City and produce long term tax
revenue.
C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
C1. Review and Discussion of Adaptive Reuse and Development Proposals for the Regina Winery Site.
(CITY)
John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager and David Eoff, Senior Planner,
who provided the background and overview of the development of the Regina Winery site and the Request for
Proposal (RFP) process. She informed that today’s presentations for the development of the Regina Winery site
along with the receipt and analysis of community feedback was one step in the RFP process. She spoke about
project stakeholders and informed that there would be three proposals presented with 20 minutes allotted per
presentation.
Deputy City Manager Sassoon introduced representatives from Cucamonga Valley Winery Resort (CVWR), the
first proposal presentation for the Regina Winery site. CVWR shared a video showcasing 3D images of the
proposed development of the Regina Winery site. CVWR stated that their proposed Winery Resort would be a
landmark destination providing world-class experiences through offerings that would include: Wine Tasting
Tours, wine production on-site accessible to guests, award winning non-chain restaurant and bar, retail spaces,
sufficient parking, outdoor patios and membership tasting areas, weddings and private events, full service on-
site catering, hidden prohibition bar, corporate & cultural events and conference spaces, 20-room contemporary
luxury resort and club house accommodations, a central bell/ viewing tower anchoring the center of the vineyard
and areas for Farmers and Artisan Craft Markets. CVWR concluded their presentation stating that they provide
an agricultural greenbelt, open spaces, beautifully landscaped common areas and the development would be
designed and operated in such a way that it both serves as a community resource, a representation of the
Valley’s long-standing history in agriculture and viticulture and as a fun versatile food, beverage and
entertainment venue for the surrounding communities and visitors alike. CVWR provided a flyer to the City
Council showcasing project highlights (included in the record), and a link to access the Site Plan and 3D images.
Council discussion ensued, questions asked to representatives from CVWR included: if there would be a spa, if
they would be repurposing portions or items of the Regina Winery site, what the capacity would be for special
events, accessibility to property, if there were renderings of the historic area and how they planned to preserve
the winery’s history, if tours would be pre-arranged, if the number of rentals (20 proposed) would increase, if
they would have sufficient parking and how many kitchens would be on-site.
Page 42
DRAFT
September 8, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 2
Representatives from CVWR responded that there currently is no spa included in the design, special events
would be able to accommodate 200-300 guests indoor and up to 500 guests outdoors, no renderings of the
historic space are available yet, wine tours would be pre-arranged and range from $20- $75 dollars per guest, if
there is an opportunity they could possibly increase the number of rentals on-site but that the priority of the
development is to keep sightlines low and that expansion is unlikely with 20 rentals being enough for now, CVWR
informed that 214 parking spaces were required for the project but that they committed to 220 spaces to have
sufficient parking and lastly they informed that the property would have three (3) kitchens on-site.
Deputy City Manager Sassoon introduced representatives from National CORE, the second proposal
presentation for the Regina Winery site. National CORE shared a PowerPoint presentation showcasing their
proposed Regina Winery Reuse Project which included a development with the following guiding principles:
creative re-use of the Regina Winery, commercial and community program, building inclusive homes for Rancho
Cucamonga, diverse places and open spaces to serve residents and visitors, neighborhood sensitivity/
compatibility and being environmentally and financially sustainable. National Core presented renderings of the
development and informed that the concept plan included Housing: 40 Artist Lofts, 130 Market Rate Apartments,
100 Workforce Apartments; Retail: 22,50 Sq. Ft. retail space and 73,000 Sq. Ft. office space and a 4,500 Sq.
Ft. retail hall with a micro-winery, wine tasting, restaurant and a 2,650 Sq. Ft. patio. Amenities included: an Art
Walk, outdoor office/ event space, a vineyard trail, stage for local arts and music and private residential
amenities. National Core noted that they will identify, document, preserve, and re-purpose vintage/historic
materials and items from throughout the project site and structures to maintain the history of the site. They also
announced their partnership with Chaffey College and noted that the development would include two story
buildings with CORE office and Academy space.
Council discussion ensued, questions asked to representatives from National CORE included: if the project
included sufficient parking, the number of National CORE employees to be on site, what the capacity would be
for special events (banquet hall), balancing business and private events, if the development included single-
family homes, if National CORE would need financial assistance from the City and if a long-term lease
arrangement would still be an option.
Representatives from National CORE responded that parking management for the proposed development is
important and that the development would be enough parking for all residents and would not impede
neighborhood. They noted that 120-140 employees would be on site, informed that the capacity for special
events would range from 400 to 500 guests and that busines rentals normally occurred during the week leaving
the banquet facility available for special events such as weddings on the weekends. They stated that there would
be no single-family homes as all housing on property would be regular and resort style apartments. They
concluded by stating that a long-term lease arrangement would still be an option, provided an overview of the
financial benefits for the City and stated that they would not need financial assistance from the City.
Deputy City Manager Sassoon introduced the third proposal presentation by representatives from Arteco,
Pelican Communities, Greens and Torti Gallas and Partners for Cooper’s Row. The Cooper’s Row project
included a mix of uses including: a place for culinary adventure, locally based craft retailers, wine tasting, a
brewery, a distillery, galleries and art studios, community gathering spaces, shopkeeper homes, creative office
spaces, a boutique hotel, cottage and bungalow homes, live/work residences and courtyard gardens. Cooper’s
Row was described as a revitalization of the existing Filippi winemaking and warehouse facilities into a
destination “Eatertainment” and craft retail experience complimented by hospitality, housing and creative office
opportunities. Developers for Cooper’s Row concluded by showing a project rendering showcasing the 14.2
acres to include 3,400 Sq. Ft. Wine making/tasting facility (Micro Winery), 4,515 Sq. Ft. banquet hall, 4,500 Sq.
Ft. outdoor event space, 5,200 Sq. Ft. Restaurant/ Gallery, 32 maker spaces, 80 room boutique hotel, 25,00 Sq.
Ft. office space, 57 cottages, 40 live-work units and 64 residential over retail units.
Council discussion ensued, questions asked to Cooper’s Row representatives from Arteco, Pelican
Communities, Greens and Torti Gallas and Partners included: if the project included sufficient parking, what the
capacity would be for special events, total amount of housing units on property, if there would be wine tasting
tours, why the proposed development was named “Cooper’s Row”, types of rentals offered, if there was a
rendering of the boutique hotel, how many rooms the hotel would have, projected nightly rate for hotel and if
they would need financial assistance from the City.
Cooper’s Row representatives from Arteco, Pelican Communities, Greens and Torti Gallas and Partners
responded that there would be sufficient parking with parking garages for cottages and 1.5 – 2.00 parking spaces
Page 43
DRAFT
September 8, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 2
per apartment, the banquet hall would accommodate 250 guests, they informed that the development would
include a total of 161 housing units composed of 57 cottages, 40 live-work apartments and 64 above retail
apartments. They noted that there would be self-guided wine tasting tours and that the name “Cooper’s Row” is
because it represents wine barrels that are made by a Cooper, a craftsman that makes wine barrels. They noted
that all housing options available in the development project would be rentals and would not be for sale. The
hotel was described as a Boutique Hotel with 80 rooms and a spa with room rates ranging from $175.00 p/night
with financial benefits through TOT tax revenue generated from the hotel and going to the City’s General Fund.
They concluded by stating that they would not need financial assistance from the City.
Senior Planner, David Eoff, provided a preliminary overview of community input collected through community
engagement efforts and open houses. Senior Planner Eoff informed that the overall engagement for the Regina
Winery Project included over 600 survey participants online and in person and over 100 open house attendees
answering survey questions tailored to each proposal. He noted that the preliminary survey feedback showed
the community in favor of the development proposed by Cucamonga Valley Winery followed by CORE Village
and Cooper’s Row. He concluded by stating that the next steps in the RFP process is to continue analyzing
community feedback, complete a financial Analysis and conduct reference checks.
Mayor Michael noted that this was a preliminary meeting in which the City Council is not ready to make decisions
and requested that staff compile and provide a chart/ spreadsheet comparison of the three projects.
City Manager Gillison responded staff would provide a chart including the different elements of each project.
D. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 4:32 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Approved:
Page 44
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the
Total Amount of $5,627,825.18 and City and Fire District Weekly Check
Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas
Company) in the Total Amount of $12,772,036.38 Dated September 07,
2021 Through October 10, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit
Registers for the Month of September in the Total Amount of
$1,083,058.23. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $3,050,451.95 and $2,577,373.23 for the City and
the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $12,390,440.12 and
$381,596.26 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Electronic Debit Register amounts are
$545,127.97 and $537,930.26 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Weekly Check Registers
Attachment 2 – Electronic Debit Register
Page 45
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013050 09/08/2021 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 873.66 0.00 873.66
AP 00013051 09/08/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 40,446.32 0.00 40,446.32
AP 00013052 09/08/2021 HAMPTON YOGA 52.50 0.00 52.50
AP 00013053 09/08/2021 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 33,220.00 0.00 33,220.00
AP 00013054 09/08/2021 ILAND INTERNET SOLUTIONS 6,883.01 0.00 6,883.01
AP 00013055 09/08/2021 RCCEA 1,577.00 0.00 1,577.00
AP 00013056 09/08/2021 RCPFA 12,743.84 0.00 12,743.84
AP 00013057 09/08/2021 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 9,158.83 0.00 9,158.83
AP 00013058 09/09/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,028.77 0.00 1,028.77
***AP 00013059 09/09/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 474.23 -80.39 393.84
AP 00013060 09/09/2021 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 99.95 0.00 99.95
***AP 00013061 09/09/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 3,785.69 647.00 4,432.69
AP 00013062 09/09/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 26.19 0.00 26.19
AP 00013063 09/09/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 530.13 0.00 530.13
AP 00013064 09/09/2021 HOSE MAN INC 268.74 0.00 268.74
***AP 00013065 09/09/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 4,159.35 337.00 4,496.35
AP 00013066 09/09/2021 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 341.00 0.00 341.00
AP 00013067 09/15/2021 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 11,720.00 11,720.00
AP 00013068 09/15/2021 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 114,750.00 0.00 114,750.00
AP 00013069 09/15/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,735,003.00 0.00 3,735,003.00
AP 00013070 09/15/2021 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 651,020.00 0.00 651,020.00
AP 00013071 09/16/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 382.53 382.53
AP 00013072 09/16/2021 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 735.00 0.00 735.00
AP 00013073 09/16/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 833.24 0.00 833.24
AP 00013074 09/16/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 257.42 0.00 257.42
AP 00013075 09/16/2021 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 112.22 0.00 112.22
***AP 00013076 09/16/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 23,075.07 3,346.25 26,421.32
AP 00013077 09/16/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 6,206.97 0.00 6,206.97
***AP 00013078 09/16/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 4,654.97 155.20 4,810.17
***AP 00013079 09/16/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 26,270.85 1,190.50 27,461.35
AP 00013080 09/16/2021 SUNRISE FORD 4,487.74 0.00 4,487.74
AP 00013084 09/22/2021 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 2,600.00 2,600.00
AP 00013085 09/22/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 28,785.48 0.00 28,785.48
AP 00013086 09/22/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 14,352.84 0.00 14,352.84
AP 00013087 09/22/2021 FEHR & PEERS 0.00 3,826.09 3,826.09
AP 00013088 09/22/2021 RCCEA 1,545.25 0.00 1,545.25
AP 00013089 09/22/2021 RCPFA 12,743.84 0.00 12,743.84
***AP 00013090 09/22/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 91,761.43 3,863.40 95,624.83
AP 00013091 09/22/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 67.00 0.00 67.00
AP 00013092 09/23/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 8,024.42 0.00 8,024.42
AP 00013093 09/23/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 3,848.73 0.00 3,848.73
AP 00013094 09/23/2021 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 201.52 0.00 201.52
AP 00013095 09/23/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,597.80 0.00 3,597.80
AP 00013096 09/23/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 335.82 335.82
AP 00013097 09/23/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 153.20 0.00 153.20
***AP 00013098 09/23/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 886.82 158.53 1,045.35
AP 00013099 09/23/2021 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 0.00 38.79
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 46
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013100 09/23/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,453.82 0.00 1,453.82
AP 00013101 09/23/2021 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 423.68 0.00 423.68
AP 00013102 09/23/2021 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013103 09/23/2021 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013104 09/23/2021 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013105 09/23/2021 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 865.08 865.08
AP 00013106 09/23/2021 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14
AP 00013107 09/23/2021 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,532.94 1,532.94
AP 00013108 09/23/2021 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32
AP 00013109 09/23/2021 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 851.32 851.32
AP 00013110 09/23/2021 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013111 09/23/2021 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013112 09/23/2021 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68
AP 00013113 09/23/2021 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78
AP 00013114 09/23/2021 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 893.07 893.07
AP 00013115 09/23/2021 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78
AP 00013116 09/23/2021 COX, KARL 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013117 09/23/2021 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013118 09/23/2021 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013119 09/23/2021 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32
AP 00013120 09/23/2021 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33
AP 00013121 09/23/2021 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 893.07 893.07
AP 00013122 09/23/2021 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 238.25 238.25
AP 00013123 09/23/2021 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32
AP 00013124 09/23/2021 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14
AP 00013125 09/23/2021 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33
AP 00013126 09/23/2021 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58
AP 00013127 09/23/2021 FRITCHEY, JOHN D 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013128 09/23/2021 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013129 09/23/2021 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 238.25 238.25
AP 00013130 09/23/2021 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58
AP 00013131 09/23/2021 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68
AP 00013132 09/23/2021 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 903.04 903.04
AP 00013133 09/23/2021 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013134 09/23/2021 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58
AP 00013135 09/23/2021 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 238.25 238.25
AP 00013136 09/23/2021 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013137 09/23/2021 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68
AP 00013138 09/23/2021 LONGO, JOE 0.00 181.48 181.48
AP 00013139 09/23/2021 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013140 09/23/2021 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 181.48 181.48
AP 00013141 09/23/2021 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013142 09/23/2021 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013143 09/23/2021 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013144 09/23/2021 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013145 09/23/2021 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,838.72 1,838.72
AP 00013146 09/23/2021 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 47
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013147 09/23/2021 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013148 09/23/2021 NEE, RON 0.00 865.08 865.08
AP 00013149 09/23/2021 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 181.48 181.48
AP 00013150 09/23/2021 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78
AP 00013151 09/23/2021 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,379.46 1,379.46
AP 00013152 09/23/2021 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94
AP 00013153 09/23/2021 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,377.34 1,377.34
AP 00013154 09/23/2021 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32
AP 00013155 09/23/2021 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013156 09/23/2021 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 893.07 893.07
AP 00013157 09/23/2021 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78
AP 00013158 09/23/2021 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14
AP 00013159 09/23/2021 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013160 09/23/2021 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013161 09/23/2021 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,873.16 1,873.16
AP 00013162 09/23/2021 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013163 09/23/2021 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 851.32 851.32
AP 00013164 09/23/2021 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 505.96 505.96
AP 00013165 09/23/2021 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 2,027.69 2,027.69
AP 00013166 09/23/2021 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14
AP 00013167 09/23/2021 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013168 09/23/2021 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32
AP 00013169 09/23/2021 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58
AP 00013170 09/23/2021 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00013171 09/29/2021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 26,559.70 0.00 26,559.70
AP 00013172 09/29/2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 1,767.00 0.00 1,767.00
AP 00013173 09/29/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 68,123.43 0.00 68,123.43
AP 00013174 09/29/2021 FEHR & PEERS 1,643.00 0.00 1,643.00
AP 00013175 09/29/2021 GEOGRAPHICS 87.50 0.00 87.50
AP 00013176 09/29/2021 HAMPTON YOGA 35.00 0.00 35.00
AP 00013177 09/29/2021 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 38,720.00 0.00 38,720.00
AP 00013178 09/30/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 521.60 0.00 521.60
AP 00013179 09/30/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 3,952.94 0.00 3,952.94
AP 00013180 09/30/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 853.63 0.00 853.63
AP 00013181 09/30/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 1,841.50 0.00 1,841.50
AP 00013182 09/30/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 187.67 0.00 187.67
AP 00013183 09/30/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,409.24 0.00 3,409.24
AP 00013184 09/30/2021 HOSE MAN INC 113.73 0.00 113.73
AP 00013185 09/30/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 817.20 817.20
AP 00013186 09/30/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 177.79 0.00 177.79
AP 00013187 09/30/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 2,440.71 0.00 2,440.71
AP 00013188 09/30/2021 SUNRISE FORD 98.33 0.00 98.33
AP 00013189 10/06/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 25,173.65 0.00 25,173.65
AP 00013190 10/06/2021 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC 33,945.00 0.00 33,945.00
AP 00013191 10/06/2021 RCCEA 1,545.25 0.00 1,545.25
AP 00013192 10/06/2021 RCPFA 12,579.84 0.00 12,579.84
AP 00013193 10/06/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 10,895.52 0.00 10,895.52
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 48
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013194 10/06/2021 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00
AP 00013195 10/06/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,675,268.78 0.00 3,675,268.78
AP 00013196 10/06/2021 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 287,660.00 0.00 287,660.00
AP 00013197 10/07/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 408.00 408.00
AP 00013198 10/07/2021 CRAFCO INC 90.51 0.00 90.51
AP 00013199 10/07/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 47.42 0.00 47.42
AP 00013200 10/07/2021 FASTENAL COMPANY 103.04 0.00 103.04
AP 00013201 10/07/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 562.46 0.00 562.46
AP 00013202 10/07/2021 HOSE MAN INC 156.27 0.00 156.27
AP 00013203 10/07/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 30.77 30.77
***AP 00013204 10/07/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 2,658.74 404.06 3,062.80
***AP 00013205 10/07/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 697.05 1,384.93 2,081.98
AP 00013206 10/07/2021 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 320.14 0.00 320.14
AP 00013207 10/07/2021 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 341.00 0.00 341.00
AP 00013208 10/07/2021 VISTA PAINT 842.18 0.00 842.18
AP 00419906 09/08/2021 KABUKI RANCHO CUCAMONGA INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00419907 09/08/2021 PITA STREET RANCHO INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00419908 09/08/2021 SUNRISE BAKERY INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00419909 09/08/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
AP 00419910 09/08/2021 ALL WELDING 365.00 0.00 365.00
AP 00419911 09/08/2021 ANDERSON, JANA 98.50 0.00 98.50
AP 00419912 09/08/2021 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES 2,917.51 0.00 2,917.51
AP 00419913 09/08/2021 ANIXTER INC 8,490.70 0.00 8,490.70
AP 00419914 09/08/2021 AUFBAU CORPORATION 0.00 5,004.00 5,004.00
AP 00419915 09/08/2021 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 552.00 0.00 552.00
AP 00419916 09/08/2021 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 156.25 0.00 156.25
AP 00419917 09/08/2021 C V W D 401.90 0.00 401.90
AP 00419918 09/08/2021 C V W D 0.00 872.34 872.34
AP 00419919 09/08/2021 C V W D 274.30 0.00 274.30
***AP 00419925 09/08/2021 C V W D 141,756.81 410.26 142,167.07
AP 00419926 09/08/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52
AP 00419927 09/08/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11
AP 00419928 09/08/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00419929 09/08/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00419930 09/08/2021 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 116.50 0.00 116.50
AP 00419931 09/08/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 5,814.69 0.00 5,814.69
AP 00419932 09/08/2021 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 600.00 0.00 600.00
***AP 00419933 09/08/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,661.22 6,437.38 11,098.60
AP 00419934 09/08/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 159.67 159.67
AP 00419935 09/08/2021 CROWN POINTE INVESTIGATIONS LLC 0.00 2,090.00 2,090.00
AP 00419936 09/08/2021 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5.00 0.00 5.00
AP 00419937 09/08/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,143.24 0.00 1,143.24
AP 00419938 09/08/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 40,984.89 0.00 40,984.89
AP 00419939 09/08/2021 DYNAMIC TELCO 490.38 0.00 490.38
AP 00419940 09/08/2021 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 1,591.62 1,591.62
AP 00419941 09/08/2021 FUEL SERV 0.00 325.18 325.18
AP 00419942 09/08/2021 GILBERT, VELMA 62.00 0.00 62.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 49
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00419943 09/08/2021 GRAINGER 162.73 0.00 162.73
AP 00419944 09/08/2021 HAN, LI 56.87 0.00 56.87
AP 00419945 09/08/2021 HENKELS & MCCOY INC 15,973.00 0.00 15,973.00
AP 00419946 09/08/2021 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00
AP 00419947 09/08/2021 INLAND EMPIRE BLUE BELLES 250.00 0.00 250.00
AP 00419948 09/08/2021 IPERMIT 243.35 0.00 243.35
AP 00419949 09/08/2021 ITRON INC 7,783.84 0.00 7,783.84
AP 00419950 09/08/2021 JIN, JANET 62.39 0.00 62.39
AP 00419951 09/08/2021 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00
AP 00419952 09/08/2021 LI, LINGGUANG 74.64 0.00 74.64
AP 00419953 09/08/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 14,500.32 14,500.32
AP 00419954 09/08/2021 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 1,710.00 0.00 1,710.00
AP 00419955 09/08/2021 LUNA, GUADALUPE 1,008.00 0.00 1,008.00
AP 00419956 09/08/2021 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00
***AP 00419957 09/08/2021 MARY MCGRATH ARCHITECTS 12,125.00 35,970.75 48,095.75
AP 00419958 09/08/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 35.21 35.21
AP 00419959 09/08/2021 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 717.20 0.00 717.20
AP 00419960 09/08/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 112.04 0.00 112.04
***AP 00419961 09/08/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 69.83 1,334.79 1,404.62
AP 00419962 09/08/2021 O S T S INC 2,354.62 0.00 2,354.62
AP 00419963 09/08/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 915.53 0.00 915.53
AP 00419964 09/08/2021 ONTRAC 58.60 0.00 58.60
AP 00419965 09/08/2021 PALMER CONSULTING 4,025.00 0.00 4,025.00
AP 00419966 09/08/2021 PEP BOYS 101.59 0.00 101.59
AP 00419967 09/08/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 0.00 24,254.87 24,254.87
AP 00419968 09/08/2021 PORAC 168.00 0.00 168.00
AP 00419969 09/08/2021 PRAYTOR, LIZA 1,067.38 0.00 1,067.38
AP 00419970 09/08/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17
AP 00419971 09/08/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 209.96 209.96
AP 00419972 09/08/2021 QUADIENT INC 594.61 0.00 594.61
AP 00419973 09/08/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 19.40 0.00 19.40
AP 00419974 09/08/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 4,255.80 0.00 4,255.80
AP 00419975 09/08/2021 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 355.00 0.00 355.00
AP 00419976 09/08/2021 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 173.01 0.00 173.01
AP 00419977 09/08/2021 REZEK ENGINEERING 184.39 0.00 184.39
AP 00419978 09/08/2021 RIVAS, ANDREA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00419979 09/08/2021 RODAS, RACHAEL 20.00 0.00 20.00
AP 00419980 09/08/2021 RODRIGUEZ, JACQUELINE 61.00 0.00 61.00
AP 00419981 09/08/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 8.00 0.00 8.00
AP 00419982 09/08/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST 3,501.00 0.00 3,501.00
AP 00419983 09/08/2021 SBPEA 2,396.46 0.00 2,396.46
AP 00419984 09/08/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00419988 09/08/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25,797.76 0.00 25,797.76
***AP 00419989 09/08/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,072.73 2,503.03 3,575.76
AP 00419990 09/08/2021 SUN, MILLY 127.00 0.00 127.00
AP 00419991 09/08/2021 TESLA ENERGY OPERATIONS INC 294.24 0.00 294.24
AP 00419992 09/08/2021 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 4,250.00 0.00 4,250.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 50
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00419993 09/08/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00
AP 00419994 09/08/2021 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00
AP 00419995 09/08/2021 US POSTMASTER 265.00 0.00 265.00
AP 00419996 09/08/2021 VCA CALIFORNIA VETERINARY SPECIALISTS 104.00 0.00 104.00
AP 00419997 09/08/2021 VEND U COMPANY 159.26 0.00 159.26
AP 00419998 09/08/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,725.60 0.00 5,725.60
AP 00419999 09/08/2021 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 4,538.67 0.00 4,538.67
AP 00420000 09/08/2021 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00420001 09/08/2021 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 680.00 0.00 680.00
AP 00420002 09/08/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,477.96 0.00 2,477.96
AP 00420003 09/08/2021 WOOLFORD, MARK A 34.00 0.00 34.00
AP 00420004 09/08/2021 ZOETIS US LLC 152.04 0.00 152.04
AP 00420006 09/14/2021 KALICORP INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420007 09/15/2021 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00420008 09/15/2021 AED BRANDS LLC 0.00 213.41 213.41
AP 00420009 09/15/2021 ALTA RANCHO PET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00420010 09/15/2021 AMS PLANNING & RESEARCH CORP 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00
AP 00420011 09/15/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 102.00 0.00 102.00
AP 00420012 09/15/2021 ANIMAL HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC CENTER 84.00 0.00 84.00
AP 00420013 09/15/2021 BAKER & TAYLOR LLC 711.52 0.00 711.52
AP 00420014 09/15/2021 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 2,160.00 2,160.00
AP 00420015 09/15/2021 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL HEALTH USA INC 63.57 0.00 63.57
AP 00420016 09/15/2021 BOLTON, HEATHER 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420017 09/15/2021 BOOT BARN INC 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00420018 09/15/2021 BROWNE, KEGAN 100.00 0.00 100.00
***AP 00420020 09/15/2021 C V W D 12,991.71 839.93 13,831.64
AP 00420021 09/15/2021 CALANIMALS 360.00 0.00 360.00
AP 00420022 09/15/2021 CALIFA GROUP 5,836.26 0.00 5,836.26
AP 00420023 09/15/2021 CALIXTO, ANAID 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420024 09/15/2021 CAMBRIDGE SEVEN ASSOCIATES INC 8,889.00 0.00 8,889.00
AP 00420025 09/15/2021 CASTRO, DAVID 151.63 0.00 151.63
AP 00420026 09/15/2021 CELLEBRITE INC 3,850.00 0.00 3,850.00
AP 00420027 09/15/2021 CHOI, ELLEN 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420028 09/15/2021 CHOW, NAOMI 50.00 0.00 50.00
***AP 00420029 09/15/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,274.13 360.42 2,634.55
AP 00420030 09/15/2021 CODE RED HEADSETS 865.05 0.00 865.05
AP 00420031 09/15/2021 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 187.50 0.00 187.50
AP 00420032 09/15/2021 CONSERVE LANDCARE LLC 65,295.87 0.00 65,295.87
AP 00420033 09/15/2021 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 1,301.47 0.00 1,301.47
AP 00420034 09/15/2021 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 0.00 540.00
AP 00420035 09/15/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 883.56 0.00 883.56
AP 00420036 09/15/2021 DATA ARC LLC 5,984.58 0.00 5,984.58
AP 00420037 09/15/2021 DATA TICKET INC 8,608.84 0.00 8,608.84
AP 00420038 09/15/2021 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 2,149.50 0.00 2,149.50
AP 00420039 09/15/2021 DIRECTV 299.99 0.00 299.99
AP 00420040 09/15/2021 DIRECTV 87.99 0.00 87.99
AP 00420041 09/15/2021 EAN SERVICES LLC 0.00 2,623.39 2,623.39
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 51
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420042 09/15/2021 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00
AP 00420043 09/15/2021 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 206.61 206.61
AP 00420044 09/15/2021 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES 1,473.00 0.00 1,473.00
AP 00420045 09/15/2021 FOOTHILL VACUUM & JANITORIAL 0.00 5.66 5.66
***AP 00420047 09/15/2021 FRONTIER COMM 2,114.47 1,651.40 3,765.87
AP 00420048 09/15/2021 FUEL SERV 555.80 0.00 555.80
AP 00420049 09/15/2021 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY & CREMATORY 560.00 0.00 560.00
AP 00420050 09/15/2021 GILLISON, JOHN 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00420051 09/15/2021 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 150.00 0.00 150.00
AP 00420052 09/15/2021 GONZALEZ, MARIA 212.49 0.00 212.49
AP 00420053 09/15/2021 GOSE, DALE 50.00 0.00 50.00
***AP 00420054 09/15/2021 GRAINGER 3,458.32 24.74 3,483.06
AP 00420055 09/15/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 734.64 0.00 734.64
AP 00420056 09/15/2021 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 39.20 0.00 39.20
AP 00420057 09/15/2021 HARGIS, ILANY G 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420058 09/15/2021 HARTE, KASSANDRA 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420059 09/15/2021 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84
AP 00420060 09/15/2021 HDL COREN & CONE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00
AP 00420061 09/15/2021 HERITAGE WELLNESS COLLECTIVE 877.00 0.00 877.00
AP 00420062 09/15/2021 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 1,393.00 0.00 1,393.00
AP 00420063 09/15/2021 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 605.45 0.00 605.45
AP 00420064 09/15/2021 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 95.00 0.00 95.00
AP 00420065 09/15/2021 HUYNH, THANH 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00420066 09/15/2021 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 619.13 0.00 619.13
AP 00420067 09/15/2021 INLAND TOPSOIL MIXES 646.50 0.00 646.50
AP 00420068 09/15/2021 INTERVET INC 323.25 0.00 323.25
AP 00420069 09/15/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 1,503.11 1,503.11
AP 00420070 09/15/2021 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 195.00 0.00 195.00
AP 00420071 09/15/2021 LOPEZ, SAMANTHA 9.00 0.00 9.00
***AP 00420073 09/15/2021 LOWES COMPANIES INC 6,911.42 1,059.22 7,970.64
AP 00420074 09/15/2021 LUCKY FEET SHOES INC 323.25 0.00 323.25
AP 00420075 09/15/2021 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 286.22 0.00 286.22
AP 00420076 09/15/2021 MARLINK INC 0.00 162.00 162.00
AP 00420077 09/15/2021 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 363.01 0.00 363.01
AP 00420078 09/15/2021 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 40.00 0.00 40.00
AP 00420079 09/15/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 4,007.43 0.00 4,007.43
AP 00420080 09/15/2021 MUSIC CHANGING LIVES 11,490.08 0.00 11,490.08
AP 00420081 09/15/2021 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00
AP 00420082 09/15/2021 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY 66.58 0.00 66.58
***AP 00420083 09/15/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 357.53 408.23 765.76
AP 00420084 09/15/2021 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 861.46 0.00 861.46
AP 00420085 09/15/2021 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 345.00 0.00 345.00
AP 00420086 09/15/2021 PALACIOS, JENNIFER 78.66 0.00 78.66
AP 00420087 09/15/2021 PALMER CONSULTING 2,424.45 0.00 2,424.45
***AP 00420088 09/15/2021 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 8,792.36 838.88 9,631.24
AP 00420089 09/15/2021 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 252.00 0.00 252.00
AP 00420090 09/15/2021 POSTAL PERFECT 525.00 0.00 525.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 52
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420091 09/15/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 123.05 123.05
AP 00420092 09/15/2021 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 1,826.21 0.00 1,826.21
AP 00420093 09/15/2021 QUINN COMPANY 744.40 0.00 744.40
AP 00420094 09/15/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 87.18 0.00 87.18
AP 00420095 09/15/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 385.63 385.63
AP 00420096 09/15/2021 SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 48.49 0.00 48.49
AP 00420097 09/15/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,443.92 0.00 15,443.92
AP 00420098 09/15/2021 SHOETERIA INC 2,237.26 0.00 2,237.26
AP 00420099 09/15/2021 SHRED PROS 646.00 0.00 646.00
AP 00420100 09/15/2021 SKYLINE SAFETY AND SUPPLY 90.10 0.00 90.10
AP 00420101 09/15/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 3,651.41 0.00 3,651.41
***AP 00420106 09/15/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117,817.08 5,091.98 122,909.06
AP 00420107 09/15/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 425.46 0.00 425.46
AP 00420108 09/15/2021 SPRINGSHARE LLC 1,299.00 0.00 1,299.00
AP 00420109 09/15/2021 THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 162.67 0.00 162.67
***AP 00420110 09/15/2021 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 1,560.00 1,075.00 2,635.00
AP 00420111 09/15/2021 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 552.43 552.43
AP 00420112 09/15/2021 TOJIN, JUAN 1,060.80 0.00 1,060.80
AP 00420113 09/15/2021 TSAI FONG BOOKS INC 1,523.42 0.00 1,523.42
AP 00420114 09/15/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 14,068.41 0.00 14,068.41
AP 00420115 09/15/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,124.60 0.00 1,124.60
AP 00420116 09/15/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00
AP 00420117 09/15/2021 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00
AP 00420118 09/15/2021 UPS 33.00 0.00 33.00
AP 00420119 09/15/2021 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 95.18 95.18
AP 00420120 09/15/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 0.00 85.11 85.11
AP 00420121 09/15/2021 VERIZON 23.94 0.00 23.94
AP 00420122 09/15/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6,113.83 0.00 6,113.83
AP 00420123 09/15/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 308.84 0.00 308.84
AP 00420124 09/15/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,003.63 0.00 1,003.63
AP 00420125 09/15/2021 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00
AP 00420126 09/15/2021 WHITE, VANNESSA 140.05 0.00 140.05
AP 00420127 09/15/2021 WILL-BURT COMPANY, THE 0.00 1,505.00 1,505.00
AP 00420128 09/15/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 265.00 0.00 265.00
AP 00420129 09/15/2021 WILSON, AARON 317.82 0.00 317.82
AP 00420130 09/15/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 750.24 0.00 750.24
AP 00420131 09/15/2021 WOLFE, SARAH 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420132 09/15/2021 YI, KAITLIN 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00420133 09/16/2021 HOFFMAN, FRANK 20.00 0.00 20.00
AP 00420134 09/21/2021 AMINS INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420135 09/21/2021 AMINSUBS INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420136 09/21/2021 DRUNKEN CAKE POPS LLC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420258 09/22/2021 A Y NURSERY INC 1,831.75 0.00 1,831.75
AP 00420259 09/22/2021 AALEWIS, JESSICA 180.96 0.00 180.96
AP 00420260 09/22/2021 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 1,598.78 0.00 1,598.78
AP 00420261 09/22/2021 AED BRANDS LLC 0.00 337.59 337.59
AP 00420262 09/22/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:8
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 53
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420263 09/22/2021 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 700.00 0.00 700.00
AP 00420264 09/22/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,881.90 0.00 1,881.90
AP 00420265 09/22/2021 ASSI SECURITY 1,677.60 0.00 1,677.60
AP 00420266 09/22/2021 ATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 0.00 7,140.00 7,140.00
AP 00420267 09/22/2021 BERMUDEZ, YAMI 1,753.92 0.00 1,753.92
AP 00420268 09/22/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 65,105.59 0.00 65,105.59
AP 00420269 09/22/2021 BURRIS, MATT 2,299.17 0.00 2,299.17
AP 00420270 09/22/2021 CALIF MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC 95.00 0.00 95.00
***AP 00420271 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 196.57 1,003.94 1,200.51
AP 00420272 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC 425.00 0.00 425.00
AP 00420273 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52
AP 00420274 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11
AP 00420275 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00420276 09/22/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00420277 09/22/2021 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 1,220.00 0.00 1,220.00
AP 00420278 09/22/2021 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 15,432.20 0.00 15,432.20
AP 00420279 09/22/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 5,410.00 0.00 5,410.00
AP 00420280 09/22/2021 CHICK-FIL-A 4,048.52 0.00 4,048.52
AP 00420281 09/22/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 598.68 598.68
AP 00420282 09/22/2021 CIRCLEPOINT 6,300.00 0.00 6,300.00
AP 00420283 09/22/2021 CMRTA 60.00 0.00 60.00
AP 00420284 09/22/2021 COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 0.00 1,073.32 1,073.32
AP 00420285 09/22/2021 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 66.36 0.00 66.36
AP 00420286 09/22/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,712.70 0.00 1,712.70
AP 00420287 09/22/2021 DATA ARC LLC 15,938.77 0.00 15,938.77
AP 00420288 09/22/2021 DECASTRO, ELENA 14.00 0.00 14.00
***AP 00420289 09/22/2021 DELL MARKETING LP 1,702.15 3,404.26 5,106.41
AP 00420290 09/22/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,120.00 0.00 1,120.00
AP 00420291 09/22/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 490.00 0.00 490.00
AP 00420292 09/22/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 40.00 0.00 40.00
AP 00420293 09/22/2021 DIG SAFE BOARD 66.22 0.00 66.22
AP 00420294 09/22/2021 EKAHAU INC 1,595.00 0.00 1,595.00
AP 00420295 09/22/2021 ELLIS, CHRISTIAN 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00420296 09/22/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 393.21 0.00 393.21
AP 00420297 09/22/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 90.10 0.00 90.10
AP 00420298 09/22/2021 FIRST AID 2000 208.39 0.00 208.39
AP 00420299 09/22/2021 FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 0.00 374.75 374.75
AP 00420300 09/22/2021 FORTIN LAW GROUP 7,486.90 0.00 7,486.90
***AP 00420301 09/22/2021 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 103,714.00 1,232.00 104,946.00
AP 00420302 09/22/2021 GRAINGER 1,232.60 0.00 1,232.60
AP 00420303 09/22/2021 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,492.54 0.00 1,492.54
AP 00420304 09/22/2021 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 280.00 0.00 280.00
AP 00420305 09/22/2021 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84
AP 00420306 09/22/2021 HONDA YAMAHA HUSQVARNA OF REDLANDS 834.33 0.00 834.33
AP 00420307 09/22/2021 HUANG, KEXIANG 5.11 0.00 5.11
AP 00420308 09/22/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 804.00 0.00 804.00
AP 00420309 09/22/2021 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 329.69 0.00 329.69
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:9
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 54
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420310 09/22/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 270.66 0.00 270.66
AP 00420311 09/22/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 0.00 2,795.42 2,795.42
AP 00420312 09/22/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,683.00 0.00 1,683.00
AP 00420313 09/22/2021 KOSMONT COMPANIES 2,580.00 0.00 2,580.00
AP 00420314 09/22/2021 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 2,203.40 2,203.40
AP 00420315 09/22/2021 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,482.10 0.00 5,482.10
AP 00420316 09/22/2021 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 8,703.00 0.00 8,703.00
AP 00420317 09/22/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 6,124.25 6,124.25
AP 00420318 09/22/2021 LOZANO SMITH LLP 15,812.14 0.00 15,812.14
AP 00420319 09/22/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 431.00 0.00 431.00
AP 00420320 09/22/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 2,832.26 0.00 2,832.26
AP 00420321 09/22/2021 MENCHACA, LESLIE 156.00 0.00 156.00
AP 00420322 09/22/2021 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 108.00 0.00 108.00
AP 00420323 09/22/2021 MORRIS, AUDREY 262.00 0.00 262.00
AP 00420324 09/22/2021 MUSIC CHANGING LIVES 4,868.20 0.00 4,868.20
AP 00420325 09/22/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 106.42 106.42
AP 00420326 09/22/2021 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 2,700.00 0.00 2,700.00
AP 00420327 09/22/2021 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN & GRAPHICS 1,439.09 0.00 1,439.09
AP 00420328 09/22/2021 NEWSBANK INC 8,534.00 0.00 8,534.00
AP 00420329 09/22/2021 NV5 INC 8,613.68 0.00 8,613.68
AP 00420330 09/22/2021 OCC BUILDERS INC 0.00 20,766.05 20,766.05
AP 00420331 09/22/2021 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 4,207.80 0.00 4,207.80
AP 00420332 09/22/2021 ONTRAC 17.74 0.00 17.74
AP 00420333 09/22/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 1,612.50 0.00 1,612.50
AP 00420334 09/22/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 1,520.00 0.00 1,520.00
AP 00420335 09/22/2021 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00
AP 00420336 09/22/2021 PEREZ, VERONICA 112.00 0.00 112.00
AP 00420337 09/22/2021 PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP 0.00 10,344.00 10,344.00
***AP 00420338 09/22/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 30,627.03 1,470.29 32,097.32
AP 00420339 09/22/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17
AP 00420340 09/22/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 292.02 292.02
AP 00420341 09/22/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 40.41 0.00 40.41
AP 00420342 09/22/2021 REHABWEST INC 332.50 0.00 332.50
AP 00420343 09/22/2021 REISNER, JENNIFER 112.00 0.00 112.00
AP 00420344 09/22/2021 ROBERTSON, BRENDA 198.60 0.00 198.60
AP 00420345 09/22/2021 SALVADOR, GIAN 16.78 0.00 16.78
AP 00420346 09/22/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST 0.00 2,728.00 2,728.00
AP 00420347 09/22/2021 SANS INSTITUTE 6,120.00 0.00 6,120.00
AP 00420348 09/22/2021 SBPEA 2,378.84 0.00 2,378.84
AP 00420349 09/22/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00420350 09/22/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 1,652.32 0.00 1,652.32
***AP 00420352 09/22/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,523.80 301.68 1,825.48
AP 00420355 09/22/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,614.58 0.00 7,614.58
AP 00420356 09/22/2021 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,572.00 0.00 1,572.00
AP 00420357 09/22/2021 STEADFAST PROPERTIES & DEVELOPMENT INC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00
AP 00420358 09/22/2021 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00
AP 00420359 09/22/2021 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 480.00 0.00 480.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:10
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 55
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420360 09/22/2021 TRANSFORM SR LLC 32,467.83 0.00 32,467.83
AP 00420361 09/22/2021 TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES INC 2,930.00 0.00 2,930.00
AP 00420362 09/22/2021 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 305.24 0.00 305.24
AP 00420363 09/22/2021 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 151.90 0.00 151.90
AP 00420364 09/22/2021 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 301.45 0.00 301.45
AP 00420365 09/22/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00
AP 00420366 09/22/2021 UPS 66.00 0.00 66.00
AP 00420367 09/22/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 183.22 0.00 183.22
AP 00420369 09/22/2021 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,117.20 0.00 1,117.20
AP 00420370 09/22/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 597.28 0.00 597.28
AP 00420371 09/22/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,857.65 0.00 2,857.65
AP 00420372 09/22/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 41,436.70 0.00 41,436.70
AP 00420373 09/22/2021 WESTLAND GROUP INC 2,921.75 0.00 2,921.75
AP 00420374 09/22/2021 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,863.14 0.00 1,863.14
AP 00420375 09/22/2021 YANG, EUN YOUNG 50.34 0.00 50.34
AP 00420376 09/22/2021 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 21.69 0.00 21.69
AP 00420377 09/22/2021 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 0.00 20,485.00 20,485.00
AP 00420378 09/23/2021 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 619.50 619.50
AP 00420379 09/23/2021 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78
AP 00420380 09/23/2021 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 238.25 238.25
AP 00420381 09/29/2021 ACAI LIFE SUPERFOODS LLC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420382 09/29/2021 MAGLOMA INC 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00
AP 00420383 09/29/2021 RED HILL COFFEE SHOP 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420384 09/29/2021 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,386.75 0.00 3,386.75
AP 00420385 09/29/2021 ACCESS TOOLKIT 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00
AP 00420386 09/29/2021 ALL WELDING 1,390.00 0.00 1,390.00
AP 00420387 09/29/2021 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 297.59 0.00 297.59
AP 00420388 09/29/2021 ALTUM GROUP, THE 2,575.40 0.00 2,575.40
AP 00420389 09/29/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 2,157.30 0.00 2,157.30
AP 00420390 09/29/2021 ATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 2,190.00 0.00 2,190.00
AP 00420391 09/29/2021 BAKER & TAYLOR LLC 326.71 0.00 326.71
AP 00420392 09/29/2021 BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS TRAINING INC 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00420393 09/29/2021 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 3,682.67 0.00 3,682.67
AP 00420394 09/29/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 41,106.68 0.00 41,106.68
***AP 00420402 09/29/2021 C V W D 188,957.78 1,432.65 190,390.43
AP 00420403 09/29/2021 CA LLC - ALTA LAGUNA MHP 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00420404 09/29/2021 CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION 1,425.00 0.00 1,425.00
AP 00420405 09/29/2021 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 116.50 0.00 116.50
AP 00420406 09/29/2021 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 600.00 0.00 600.00
AP 00420407 09/29/2021 CASTLE, ARTHUR 32.91 0.00 32.91
AP 00420408 09/29/2021 CELLEBRITE INC 668.06 0.00 668.06
AP 00420409 09/29/2021 CHAMPION AWARDS & SPECIALTIES 19.40 0.00 19.40
AP 00420410 09/29/2021 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00
***AP 00420411 09/29/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,956.85 322.91 2,279.76
AP 00420412 09/29/2021 CIRCLEPOINT 10,639.00 0.00 10,639.00
AP 00420413 09/29/2021 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 13,302.50 0.00 13,302.50
AP 00420414 09/29/2021 COAST RECREATION INC 155.61 0.00 155.61
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:11
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 56
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420415 09/29/2021 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 450.00 0.00 450.00
AP 00420416 09/29/2021 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,867.07 0.00 2,867.07
AP 00420417 09/29/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,650.74 0.00 1,650.74
AP 00420418 09/29/2021 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 7,599.62 7,599.62
AP 00420419 09/29/2021 DEGRAW, LIANNE 83.77 0.00 83.77
AP 00420420 09/29/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 62.50 0.00 62.50
AP 00420421 09/29/2021 DOG WASTE DEPOT 291.61 0.00 291.61
AP 00420422 09/29/2021 ECORP CONSULTING INC 1,791.25 0.00 1,791.25
AP 00420423 09/29/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 147.86 0.00 147.86
AP 00420424 09/29/2021 FIRST IN PRODUCTS INC 0.00 1,388.91 1,388.91
AP 00420425 09/29/2021 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 39.98 39.98
AP 00420426 09/29/2021 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS INC 0.00 2,413.30 2,413.30
AP 00420427 09/29/2021 FRONTIER COMM 7,944.02 0.00 7,944.02
AP 00420428 09/29/2021 FS CONTRACTORS INC 10,225.73 0.00 10,225.73
AP 00420429 09/29/2021 FUEL SERV 608.02 0.00 608.02
AP 00420430 09/29/2021 GILLISON, JOHN 22.60 0.00 22.60
AP 00420431 09/29/2021 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00
AP 00420432 09/29/2021 GRAINGER 32.54 0.00 32.54
AP 00420433 09/29/2021 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 1,055.95 0.00 1,055.95
AP 00420434 09/29/2021 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00420435 09/29/2021 HANDTEVY PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY STANDARDS 0.00 922.50 922.50
AP 00420436 09/29/2021 HLP INC 158.90 0.00 158.90
AP 00420437 09/29/2021 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00420438 09/29/2021 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE CO INC 502.22 0.00 502.22
AP 00420439 09/29/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 1,725.00 1,725.00
AP 00420440 09/29/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 0.00 4,764.63 4,764.63
AP 00420441 09/29/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 2,619.00 0.00 2,619.00
AP 00420442 09/29/2021 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.47.20 0.00 47.20
AP 00420443 09/29/2021 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 239,727.47 0.00 239,727.47
AP 00420444 09/29/2021 KAISER PERMANENTE FONTANA MEDICAL CENTER 535.00 0.00 535.00
AP 00420445 09/29/2021 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 15,603.75 0.00 15,603.75
AP 00420446 09/29/2021 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 79,233.00 0.00 79,233.00
AP 00420447 09/29/2021 KNIGHT LEADERSHIP SOLUTIONS 1,410.00 0.00 1,410.00
AP 00420448 09/29/2021 LABCORP EMPLOYER SERVICES INC 1,599.00 0.00 1,599.00
AP 00420449 09/29/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 646.50 646.50
AP 00420450 09/29/2021 LISA WISE CONSULTING 96,107.83 0.00 96,107.83
AP 00420451 09/29/2021 LOZANO SMITH LLP 2,349.00 0.00 2,349.00
AP 00420452 09/29/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 573.10 573.10
AP 00420453 09/29/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 908.97 0.00 908.97
***AP 00420454 09/29/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 157.13 552.39 709.52
AP 00420455 09/29/2021 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 600.00 0.00 600.00
AP 00420456 09/29/2021 NBS 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00
AP 00420457 09/29/2021 OLMEDA, CHRISTINA 138.00 0.00 138.00
AP 00420458 09/29/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 13,232.50 0.00 13,232.50
AP 00420459 09/29/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 28,415.74 0.00 28,415.74
AP 00420460 09/29/2021 PATTON SALES CORP 426.96 0.00 426.96
AP 00420461 09/29/2021 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:12
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 57
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420462 09/29/2021 PLACEWORKS 33,344.71 0.00 33,344.71
AP 00420463 09/29/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 244.60 244.60
AP 00420464 09/29/2021 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 302.54 0.00 302.54
AP 00420465 09/29/2021 PRO-WEST & ASSOCIATES INC 4,361.93 0.00 4,361.93
AP 00420466 09/29/2021 QIN, VIVIANNA 77.98 0.00 77.98
AP 00420467 09/29/2021 QUADIENT INC 713.03 0.00 713.03
AP 00420468 09/29/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.00 0.00 3,166.00
AP 00420469 09/29/2021 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LLC 0.00 2,772.43 2,772.43
AP 00420470 09/29/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 6,978.00 0.00 6,978.00
AP 00420471 09/29/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST 0.00 2,818.00 2,818.00
***AP 00420472 09/29/2021 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 460.15 178.15 638.30
AP 00420473 09/29/2021 SHRED PROS 163.00 0.00 163.00
AP 00420474 09/29/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 30,946.00 0.00 30,946.00
***AP 00420476 09/29/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,523.80 301.68 1,825.48
AP 00420477 09/29/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 1,735.74 1,735.74
***AP 00420486 09/29/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25,834.19 2,337.75 28,171.94
AP 00420487 09/29/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,114.33 0.00 3,114.33
AP 00420488 09/29/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,261.06 0.00 3,261.06
***AP 00420489 09/29/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 2,110.00 925.00 3,035.00
AP 00420490 09/29/2021 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 5,721.06 0.00 5,721.06
AP 00420491 09/29/2021 STRATEGIC ECONOMICS INC 6,323.75 0.00 6,323.75
AP 00420492 09/29/2021 SUN, DIAN 87.16 0.00 87.16
AP 00420493 09/29/2021 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00420494 09/29/2021 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 2,700.00 2,700.00
AP 00420495 09/29/2021 TOWN SQUARE CLEANERS 527.31 0.00 527.31
AP 00420496 09/29/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 21,256.24 0.00 21,256.24
AP 00420497 09/29/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,124.60 0.00 1,124.60
AP 00420498 09/29/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 20,489.49 0.00 20,489.49
AP 00420499 09/29/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,124.60 0.00 1,124.60
AP 00420500 09/29/2021 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 628.71 628.71
AP 00420501 09/29/2021 UPS 48.63 0.00 48.63
AP 00420502 09/29/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 0.00 599.03 599.03
AP 00420503 09/29/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.32 0.00 46.32
AP 00420504 09/29/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,617.30 5,617.30
AP 00420505 09/29/2021 VERONICA TAM AND ASSOCIATES 9,400.00 0.00 9,400.00
AP 00420506 09/29/2021 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,389.53 0.00 10,389.53
AP 00420507 09/29/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 377.22 0.00 377.22
***AP 00420508 09/29/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,362.81 221.93 1,584.74
AP 00420509 09/29/2021 WELLS, JUDITH 22.60 0.00 22.60
AP 00420510 09/29/2021 WESTLAND GROUP INC 5,180.25 0.00 5,180.25
AP 00420511 09/29/2021 WESTLAND GROUP INC 28,900.00 0.00 28,900.00
AP 00420512 09/29/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 350.00 0.00 350.00
AP 00420513 09/29/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 104.48 104.48
AP 00420514 09/29/2021 ZHONG, XIN 13.54 0.00 13.54
AP 00420515 09/30/2021 REDMOND SCHWARTZ MARK DESIGN INC 65,650.00 0.00 65,650.00
AP 00420516 10/06/2021 4 IMPRINT INC 6,874.63 0.00 6,874.63
AP 00420517 10/06/2021 5 STAR BAKERY PRODUCTS LLC 198.00 0.00 198.00
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:13
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 58
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420518 10/06/2021 AAA PROPERTY MGMT & INVESTMENT 79.81 0.00 79.81
AP 00420519 10/06/2021 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES INC 265.00 0.00 265.00
AP 00420520 10/06/2021 ADAAWE 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00
AP 00420521 10/06/2021 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 1,311.50 0.00 1,311.50
AP 00420522 10/06/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
AP 00420523 10/06/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 4,311.14 0.00 4,311.14
AP 00420524 10/06/2021 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 2,900.00 0.00 2,900.00
AP 00420525 10/06/2021 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3,480.00 0.00 3,480.00
AP 00420526 10/06/2021 AUERBACH POLLOCK FRIEDLANDER 2,875.00 0.00 2,875.00
AP 00420527 10/06/2021 BEGZADEH, LAMIA 8.36 0.00 8.36
AP 00420528 10/06/2021 BIAN, YINGYAN 85.94 0.00 85.94
AP 00420529 10/06/2021 BIRD TRUST, THE CLAUDIA STORM 5,394.00 0.00 5,394.00
AP 00420530 10/06/2021 BLIGH PACIFIC 9,289.00 0.00 9,289.00
AP 00420531 10/06/2021 BOOT BARN INC 512.71 0.00 512.71
AP 00420532 10/06/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 34,220.26 0.00 34,220.26
AP 00420533 10/06/2021 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 843.75 0.00 843.75
AP 00420534 10/06/2021 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES INC 160,744.25 0.00 160,744.25
***AP 00420535 10/06/2021 C V W D 74.34 743.15 817.49
AP 00420536 10/06/2021 C V W D 0.00 138.00 138.00
AP 00420537 10/06/2021 C V W D 226.55 0.00 226.55
***AP 00420543 10/06/2021 C V W D 97,463.14 529.41 97,992.55
AP 00420544 10/06/2021 CADENCE ARTS NETWORK INC 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00420545 10/06/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11
AP 00420546 10/06/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52
AP 00420547 10/06/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00420548 10/06/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00420549 10/06/2021 CALIX INC 12,496.85 0.00 12,496.85
AP 00420550 10/06/2021 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 116.50 0.00 116.50
AP 00420551 10/06/2021 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 275.00 0.00 275.00
***AP 00420552 10/06/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,661.22 6,437.39 11,098.61
AP 00420553 10/06/2021 CHEN, DAVID 0.00 320.00 320.00
AP 00420554 10/06/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 37.51 37.51
AP 00420555 10/06/2021 COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 0.00 1,665.86 1,665.86
AP 00420556 10/06/2021 CRESTWOOD CORPORATION 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00
AP 00420557 10/06/2021 DR HORTON / WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING INC 7.61 0.00 7.61
AP 00420558 10/06/2021 DATA ARC LLC 5,287.40 0.00 5,287.40
AP 00420559 10/06/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,143.24 0.00 1,143.24
AP 00420560 10/06/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 40,555.97 0.00 40,555.97
AP 00420561 10/06/2021 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 700.00 700.00
AP 00420562 10/06/2021 EXPRESS CORPORATE HOUSING 43.56 0.00 43.56
AP 00420563 10/06/2021 FRASURE, MICHAEL 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
***AP 00420564 10/06/2021 FRONTIER COMM 2,456.20 579.12 3,035.32
AP 00420565 10/06/2021 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 281.58 0.00 281.58
AP 00420566 10/06/2021 GALLARDO, ERNEST 300.00 0.00 300.00
AP 00420567 10/06/2021 GONZALES, NICHOLAS 64.06 0.00 64.06
AP 00420568 10/06/2021 GOODMAN, DEBORAH 50.41 0.00 50.41
AP 00420569 10/06/2021 GRAINGER 0.00 846.96 846.96
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:14
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 59
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420570 10/06/2021 GUZMAN AND JEFFREY D EASLEY JD, VALERIE 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00
AP 00420571 10/06/2021 HARVEY, RICHARD 995.00 0.00 995.00
AP 00420572 10/06/2021 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 331.50 331.50
AP 00420573 10/06/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
AP 00420574 10/06/2021 HSU, ALEXANDRE 78.60 0.00 78.60
AP 00420575 10/06/2021 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 88.00 0.00 88.00
AP 00420576 10/06/2021 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 915.00 915.00
AP 00420577 10/06/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 1,176.50 0.00 1,176.50
AP 00420578 10/06/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 128.39 0.00 128.39
AP 00420579 10/06/2021 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50
AP 00420580 10/06/2021 JOHNSON, NICK 0.00 320.00 320.00
AP 00420581 10/06/2021 JY NEW HOME LLC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00
AP 00420582 10/06/2021 K-K WOODWORKING 64.59 0.00 64.59
AP 00420583 10/06/2021 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 19,202.28 0.00 19,202.28
AP 00420584 10/06/2021 LANGUAGE NETWORK INC 125.00 0.00 125.00
AP 00420585 10/06/2021 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 524.31 0.00 524.31
AP 00420586 10/06/2021 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00
AP 00420587 10/06/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 2,510.09 0.00 2,510.09
***AP 00420588 10/06/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 59,084.36 5,805.78 64,890.14
***AP 00420589 10/06/2021 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 581.72 429.26 1,010.98
AP 00420590 10/06/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1,197.41 0.00 1,197.41
AP 00420591 10/06/2021 MEEDER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00
***AP 00420592 10/06/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 85.02 139.59 224.61
AP 00420593 10/06/2021 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 60.00 0.00 60.00
AP 00420594 10/06/2021 PAPE GROUP INC, THE 1,100.12 0.00 1,100.12
AP 00420595 10/06/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 1,001.98 0.00 1,001.98
AP 00420596 10/06/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17
AP 00420597 10/06/2021 PROHEALTH PARTNERS A MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 300.00 300.00
AP 00420598 10/06/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 89.90 0.00 89.90
AP 00420599 10/06/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 43.64 0.00 43.64
AP 00420600 10/06/2021 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 160.00 0.00 160.00
AP 00420601 10/06/2021 RLF II WEST LLC 75,000.00 0.00 75,000.00
AP 00420602 10/06/2021 SAFE SOFTWARE INC 9,001.00 0.00 9,001.00
AP 00420603 10/06/2021 SAFETY CENTER INC 2,900.00 0.00 2,900.00
AP 00420604 10/06/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,443.92 0.00 15,443.92
AP 00420605 10/06/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 31.85 0.00 31.85
AP 00420606 10/06/2021 SBPEA 2,357.25 0.00 2,357.25
AP 00420607 10/06/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00420608 10/06/2021 SHOETERIA INC 355.00 0.00 355.00
AP 00420609 10/06/2021 SHRED PROS 218.00 0.00 218.00
AP 00420610 10/06/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 77,093.67 0.00 77,093.67
AP 00420611 10/06/2021 SIMMONS, STEPHEN 400.00 0.00 400.00
***AP 00420612 10/06/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 112.65 11.26 123.91
AP 00420613 10/06/2021 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,709.00 0.00 2,709.00
AP 00420614 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIF FLEET SERVICES INC 128.40 0.00 128.40
AP 00420616 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29,942.70 0.00 29,942.70
AP 00420617 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.98 0.00 45.98
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:15
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 60
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00420618 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.56 0.00 47.56
***AP 00420619 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,110.75 2,591.75 3,702.50
AP 00420620 10/06/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 305.22 0.00 305.22
AP 00420621 10/06/2021 SUN, LUJIA 24.68 0.00 24.68
AP 00420622 10/06/2021 TAHA, MOHAMMAD 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00
AP 00420623 10/06/2021 THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 2,581.30 0.00 2,581.30
AP 00420624 10/06/2021 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 6,374.11 0.00 6,374.11
AP 00420625 10/06/2021 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 150.00 0.00 150.00
AP 00420626 10/06/2021 TIREHUB LLC 1,528.70 0.00 1,528.70
AP 00420627 10/06/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00
AP 00420628 10/06/2021 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 497.03 497.03
AP 00420629 10/06/2021 UPS 33.00 0.00 33.00
AP 00420630 10/06/2021 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00
AP 00420631 10/06/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 378.87 0.00 378.87
AP 00420632 10/06/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 899.35 0.00 899.35
***AP 00420633 10/06/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5,331.29 2,951.86 8,283.15
AP 00420634 10/06/2021 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 0.00 223.39 223.39
AP 00420635 10/06/2021 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38
AP 00420636 10/06/2021 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 0.00 118.79 118.79
AP 00420637 10/07/2021 ATALLAH & SONS 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420638 10/07/2021 HONG JI MANAGEMENT INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00420639 10/07/2021 ORIGINAL MUFFIN MESSAGE, THE 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00
$12,390,440.12
$12,772,036.38
$381,596.26
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:45:22
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:16
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 61
DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT
9/1 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,908.20 1,908.20
9/2 Bank Fee 100.20 100.20
9/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 219.46 219.46
9/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,229.25 2,229.25
9/3 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 213.09 213.09
9/3 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,461.32 2,461.32
9/7 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 8,983.21 8,983.21
9/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 57,076.73 57,076.73
9/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 109,568.94 109,568.94
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,293.04 3,293.04
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,436.12 3,436.12
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,358.41 5,358.41
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,982.67 9,982.67
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 29,597.28 29,597.28
9/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 116,628.57 116,628.57
9/9 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60
9/9 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50
9/9 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,320.00 2,320.00
9/20 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 144,948.30 144,948.30
9/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 173.60 173.60
9/22 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 57,108.71 57,108.71
9/22 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 106,375.22 106,375.22
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,293.04 3,293.04
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,436.12 3,436.12
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,029.32 5,029.32
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,982.67 9,982.67
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 29,430.80 29,430.80
9/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 116,643.58 116,643.58
9/23 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60
9/23 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50
9/23 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 124.20 124.20
9/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 184,641.08 184,641.08
9/27 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 54,008.53 54,008.53
9/28 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 386.64 386.64
9/28 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,603.86 1,603.86
9/29 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 592.14 592.14
9/29 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,037.73 1,037.73
TOTAL CITY 545,127.97
TOTAL FIRE 537,930.26
GRAND TOTAL 1,083,058.23
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 to SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
1 Page 62
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers
for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total
Amount of $7,516.92 Dated September 07, 2021 Through October 10,
2021. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $6,813.73 and $703.19 for the City
and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 63
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
So Calif Gas Company Only.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9/7/2021 through 10/10/2021
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
***AP 00420351 09/22/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,439.26 352.26 2,791.52
***AP 00420475 09/29/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,374.47 350.93 4,725.40
$6,813.73
$7,516.92
$703.19
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:49:45
10/11/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 64
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of
August 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive
and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of August 31, 2021.
BACKGROUND:
The attached investment schedules as of August 31, 2021 reflect cash and investments managed
by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with the
requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District’s adopted Investment Policies
as approved on June 28, 2021.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s and District’s Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to
the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days
following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers
have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council’s core value of providing and
nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of
the City’s investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the
various services the City provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Investment Schedule (City)
Attachment 2 - Investment Schedule (Fire)
Page 65
Page 66
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
5,801,214.36 1.73 Asset-Backed Security
43,206,482.57 12.89 Federal Agency Bond / Note
28,069,506.22 8.38 Corporate Note
1,232,500.93 0.37 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
1,013,350.00 0.30 Municipal Bond / Note
9,247,620.15 2.76 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
180,900,695.63 53.98 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
62,345,226.58 18.60 Local Agency Investment Fund
3,304,757.62 0.99 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$335,121,354.06 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFM Managed Account 452,922.87 269,471,369.86
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 62,345,226.58
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 3,304,757.62
$452,922.87 $335,121,354.06 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
65,649,984.20
0.00
0.00
4,993,053.39
11,494,462.90
85,574,982.34
47,057,768.72
73,829,840.84
46,521,261.67
0.00
19.59
0.00
0.00
1.49
3.43
25.54
14.04
22.03
13.88
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $335,121,354.06
794
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
1.73%
ABS
12.89%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
8.38%
Corporate Note
0.37%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
0.30%
Muni Bond / Note
2.76%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
53.98%
US TSY Bond / Note
18.60%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
0.99%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1
Page 67
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$256,129,287.63
(475,000.00)
(8,620,702.06)
22,842,375.54
0.00
(404,591.25)
$269,471,369.86
434,125.13
(2,160.32)
20,958.06
$452,922.87
Total
269,463,830.12
559,402.46
8,652,400.85
477,522.25
399,904.09
(22,844,535.86)
(255,801,029.59)
(740,188.20)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $167,306.12
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
477,522.25
8,652,400.85
399,904.09
0.00
(22,844,535.86)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$737,969.08 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340000 Page 1
Page 68
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 178,125,000.00 180,900,695.63 67.13
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 9,155,000.00 9,247,620.15 3.43
Municipal Bond / Note 1,000,000.00 1,013,350.00 0.38
Federal Agency Bond / Note 43,200,000.00 43,206,482.57 16.03
Corporate Note 27,250,000.00 28,069,506.22 10.42
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 1,225,000.00 1,232,500.93 0.46
Asset-Backed Security 5,805,000.00 5,801,214.36 2.15
Managed Account Sub-Total 265,760,000.00 269,471,369.86 100.00%
Accrued Interest 559,402.46
Total Portfolio 265,760,000.00 270,030,772.32
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
2.15%
ABS
0.46%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
10.42%
Corporate Note
16.03%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
0.38%
Muni Bond / Note
3.43%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
67.13%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
1.85%
4.27%
31.76%
17.46%
27.40%
17.26%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 987
0.48%
0.40%
Account 73340000 Page 2
Page 69
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
1.06%
A
0.16%
A+
1.51%
A-
1.68%
AA
86.55%
AA+
2.12%
AA-
5.03%
AAA
0.70%
BBB+
1.19%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
1,454,669.72 0.54 AMAZON.COM INC
8,134,916.88 3.02 APPLE INC
517,556.98 0.19 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA LLC
2,460,835.60 0.91 CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST
664,219.38 0.25 CHARLES SCHWAB
243,244.33 0.09 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
244,414.70 0.09 ENERBANK USA
31,443,505.87 11.67 FANNIE MAE
2,985,744.00 1.11 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
8,777,232.70 3.26 FREDDIE MAC
1,746,881.60 0.65 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
375,436.20 0.14 GM FINANCIAL CONSUMER AUTOMOBILE TRUST
515,046.66 0.19 GM FINANCIAL LEASINGTRUST
1,885,776.60 0.70 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
529,694.30 0.20 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES
280,600.40 0.10 HYUNDAI AUTO LEASE SECURITIZATION TRUST
540,041.80 0.20 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES
1,561,738.50 0.58 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
7,685,881.65 2.85 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
607,088.47 0.23 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
919,552.20 0.34 KUBOTA CREDIT OWNER TRUST
1,709,235.20 0.63 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
243,712.28 0.09 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
180,007.20 0.07 MERCEDES-BENZ AUTO LEASE TRUST
458,524.89 0.17 MICROSOFT CORP
250,468.89 0.09 MORGAN STANLEY
3,095,703.00 1.15 NOVARTIS AG
1,013,350.00 0.38 SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
1,671,553.70 0.62 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION
440,426.80 0.16 UNILEVER PLC
180,900,695.63 67.13 UNITED STATES TREASURY
2,606,510.00 0.97 US BANCORP
Account 73340000 Page 3
Page 70
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
3,076,443.00 1.14 WAL-MART STORES INC
250,660.73 0.09 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
$269,471,369.86 Total 100.00%
Account 73340000 Page 4
Page 71
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
8,003,750.40 7,999,262.70 1,711.96 7,998,437.50 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 912828ZX1 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
2,986,362.50 2,985,012.52 5,104.35 3,035,775.98 09/28/2009/28/20AaaAA+ 2,935,000.00 912828XQ8 0.13
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
8,113,750.40 8,110,873.49 41,775.96 8,202,500.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 912828YK0 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
5,854,218.75 5,851,766.26 27,675.78 5,921,152.34 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 5,750,000.00 912828TY6 0.15
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
8,596,875.00 8,594,453.24 42,688.52 8,695,312.50 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 8,400,000.00 912828M80 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
5,132,812.50 5,129,945.20 18,189.54 5,205,078.13 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828N30 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
2,476,125.12 2,474,153.56 4,956.52 2,515,031.25 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,400,000.00 9128283U2 0.19
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
1,877,309.38 1,875,673.17 131.25 1,910,257.03 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 1,810,000.00 9128284A5 0.19
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
7,142,187.50 7,142,968.75 290.06 7,200,156.25 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 912828P79 0.13
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
5,027,344.00 5,025,817.59 11,548.91 5,039,648.44 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5 0.16
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
5,214,844.00 5,213,806.40 46,331.52 5,329,882.81 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 9128284L1 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
3,588,593.75 3,588,669.92 14,451.84 3,630,429.69 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,500,000.00 912828R69 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
6,508,125.00 6,512,039.77 3,463.11 6,518,281.25 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7 0.15
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
5,993,437.20 5,990,470.27 652.17 5,990,156.25 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21
Account 73340000 Page 5
Page 72
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
4,992,969.00 4,994,386.92 288.72 4,991,796.88 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8 0.18
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
4,990,625.00 4,991,635.67 2,887.23 4,988,476.56 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
8,412,500.00 8,437,858.04 524.86 8,600,312.50 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 9128286G0 0.18
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
3,774,850.96 3,784,628.97 24,361.96 3,836,983.59 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,615,000.00 912828X70 0.23
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
4,998,437.50 5,006,461.82 2,445.65 5,006,640.63 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3 0.33
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
5,895,914.35 5,918,347.42 8,628.26 5,995,139.06 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,670,000.00 912828Y87 0.24
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
6,151,875.00 6,180,410.74 207.18 6,216,328.13 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 912828YE4 0.24
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
6,312,187.20 6,352,163.26 53,647.54 6,457,968.75 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
2,583,593.75 2,593,567.01 12,635.87 2,616,796.88 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 912828YM6 0.31
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
5,168,750.00 5,193,902.31 19,057.38 5,239,843.75 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828YV6 0.30
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
6,465,937.20 6,524,749.07 455.80 6,663,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1 0.23
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
2,746,562.50 2,765,874.42 5,785.52 2,769,335.94 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0 0.34
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
4,438,125.00 4,481,545.74 978.26 4,478,730.47 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7 0.36
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
6,903,750.00 6,962,451.20 1,521.74 6,956,250.00 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7 0.39
Account 73340000 Page 6
Page 73
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
3,848,812.50 3,841,414.82 2,503.74 3,837,082.03 05/07/2105/06/21AaaAA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4 0.73
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
4,086,710.94 4,079,121.35 1,351.63 4,076,834.18 07/07/2107/06/21AaaAA+ 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3 0.74
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
5,915,625.00 5,913,807.17 1,956.52 5,912,578.13 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3 0.71
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
2,625,984.38 2,626,425.19 36.60 2,623,810.55 03/03/2103/02/21AaaAA+ 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3 0.70
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
3,004,218.60 2,975,776.96 9,467.21 2,973,632.81 04/06/2104/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7 0.93
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
6,101,906.25 6,087,308.06 11,625.00 6,086,656.25 06/04/2106/02/21AaaAA+ 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6 0.79
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
1,986,250.00 1,986,192.65 1,086.96 1,986,015.63 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.77
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
2,979,375.00 2,992,158.02 1,630.43 2,992,031.25 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.68
382,055.55 180,900,695.63 181,185,099.65 0.30 182,499,093.39 178,125,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
4,534,528.50 4,500,940.98 8,750.00 4,510,530.00 07/26/1707/26/17AaaAAA 4,500,000.00 459058FY4 1.95
INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
1,743,337.02 1,742,050.90 793.73 1,741,387.85 04/20/2104/13/21AaaAAA 1,745,000.00 459058JV6 0.23
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
1,408,016.13 1,407,746.45 949.79 1,406,968.50 11/24/2011/17/20AaaAAA 1,410,000.00 459058JM6 0.32
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
1,561,738.50 1,567,071.28 12,177.08 1,576,950.00 02/23/2102/19/21AaaAAA 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1 0.47
Account 73340000 Page 7
Page 74
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
22,670.60 9,247,620.15 9,217,809.61 1.13 9,235,836.35 9,155,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
504,350.00 500,955.47 484.17 502,300.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QR2 0.95
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
509,000.00 502,024.05 527.50 503,385.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QS0 1.05
1,011.67 1,013,350.00 1,002,979.52 1.00 1,005,685.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
4,263,821.22 4,260,795.59 1,508.75 4,261,192.80 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4 0.24
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
4,802,740.80 4,802,007.38 5,766.67 4,802,928.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5 0.23
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
1,700,309.40 1,698,888.80 1,357.64 1,698,470.00 11/05/2011/03/20AaaAA+ 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8 0.28
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
4,400,822.80 4,396,264.29 2,872.22 4,394,984.00 11/25/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1 0.29
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
3,479,400.45 3,490,888.90 8,165.63 3,529,794.50 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 3,350,000.00 3135G0X24 0.36
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3,992,252.00 4,007,265.07 4,111.11 4,009,400.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 4,000,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.45
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
4,990,315.00 5,014,308.18 5,138.89 5,017,800.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.42
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
2,985,744.00 3,005,508.58 2,458.33 3,007,110.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71 0.45
FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
2,493,140.00 2,499,222.89 1,736.11 2,499,000.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5 0.63
Account 73340000 Page 8
Page 75
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
1,978,754.00 1,990,466.93 125.00 1,988,500.00 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7 0.50
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
2,274,182.50 2,294,371.27 3,785.42 2,293,077.00 09/25/2009/23/20AaaAA+ 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3 0.44
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
1,379,380.40 1,388,086.14 2,200.83 1,387,720.40 11/13/2011/12/20AaaAA+ 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
4,465,620.00 4,495,298.79 7,125.00 4,494,465.00 12/04/2012/02/20AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53
46,351.60 43,206,482.57 43,343,372.81 0.39 43,384,441.70 43,200,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
458,524.89 455,000.00 758.33 455,000.00 02/14/1702/14/17AaaAAA 455,000.00 594918BW3 2.40
WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE)
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
3,076,443.00 2,975,277.66 14,883.33 2,913,840.00 06/21/1806/21/18Aa2AA 3,000,000.00 931142DU4 3.04
APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
3,510,345.00 3,372,696.63 26,668.00 3,348,574.20 05/06/1905/06/19Aa1AA+ 3,390,000.00 037833AK6 2.73
APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
1,452,314.88 1,442,669.50 3,300.00 1,444,737.60 05/11/2005/11/20Aa1AA+ 1,440,000.00 037833DV9 0.64
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
3,172,257.00 3,009,005.14 5,500.00 3,019,140.00 02/11/1902/11/19Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 037833CG3 2.86
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
664,219.38 659,720.28 2,241.25 659,670.00 03/18/2103/16/21A2A 660,000.00 808513BN4 0.77
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
1,454,669.72 1,453,092.78 1,982.44 1,452,875.70 05/12/2105/10/21A1AA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5 0.50
Account 73340000 Page 9
Page 76
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024
440,426.80 440,000.00 145.37 440,000.00 08/12/2108/09/21A1A+ 440,000.00 904764BN6 0.63
BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
517,556.98 514,954.50 203.85 514,953.65 08/12/2108/09/21A2A 515,000.00 05565EBU8 0.75
US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
2,606,510.00 2,612,471.91 5,694.44 2,640,450.00 11/05/2010/30/20A1AA- 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1 0.69
NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
3,095,703.00 3,113,567.40 2,479.17 3,144,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20A1AA- 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3 0.63
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
607,088.47 610,000.00 143.10 610,000.00 02/16/2102/09/21A2A- 610,000.00 46647PBY1 0.56
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
1,709,235.20 1,700,031.96 23,200.00 1,714,864.00 03/09/2103/05/21A3A- 1,600,000.00 539830BE8 1.05
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
1,746,881.60 1,739,178.14 16,488.89 1,757,296.00 03/09/2103/05/21A2A- 1,600,000.00 369550BG2 1.09
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
1,671,553.70 1,684,121.52 1,158.44 1,684,005.85 02/01/2101/28/21A1A 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0 0.76
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
1,885,776.60 1,903,458.81 857.38 1,903,876.00 02/17/2102/12/21A2BBB+ 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8 0.81
105,703.99 28,069,506.22 27,685,246.23 1.52 27,704,033.00 27,250,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
250,660.73 245,000.00 38.26 245,000.00 01/29/2001/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 949763S64 1.90
Account 73340000 Page 10
Page 77
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
250,468.89 245,000.00 409.79 245,000.00 01/30/2001/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 61760A6Q7 1.85
ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
244,414.70 245,000.00 24.16 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
243,244.33 245,000.00 10.07 245,000.00 07/29/2007/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 169894AT9 0.50
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
243,712.28 245,000.00 7.38 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55
489.66 1,232,500.93 1,225,000.00 1.06 1,225,000.00 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
180,007.20 179,985.44 20.00 179,981.80 01/27/2101/20/21AaaAAA 180,000.00 58770GAC4 0.25
HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
280,600.40 279,980.36 52.27 279,976.70 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 280,000.00 44891TAD8 0.42
GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
515,046.66 514,932.33 51.93 514,922.24 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 515,000.00 36261RAD0 0.33
HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
529,694.30 529,991.51 39.75 529,990.30 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 530,000.00 43813GAC5 0.27
HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
540,041.80 539,947.66 91.20 539,943.19 04/28/2104/20/21NRAAA 540,000.00 44933LAC7 0.38
GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
375,436.20 374,948.03 54.69 374,940.30 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 375,000.00 36261LAC5 0.35
KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
919,552.20 924,965.91 230.22 924,965.13 07/28/2107/20/21AaaNR 925,000.00 50117XAE2 0.56
CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
119,850.47 119,979.18 18.13 119,976.29 01/27/2101/20/21NRAAA 120,000.00 14316NAC3 0.34
CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
811,493.24 809,838.62 187.20 809,825.45 04/21/2104/13/21NRAAA 810,000.00 14314QAC8 0.52
Account 73340000 Page 11
Page 78
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
1,529,491.89 1,529,753.26 374.00 1,529,748.32 07/28/2107/21/21AaaAAA 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4 0.55
1,119.39 5,801,214.36 5,804,322.30 0.46 5,804,269.72 5,805,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
265,760,000.00 270,858,359.16 0.48 559,402.46 269,463,830.12 269,471,369.86 Managed Account Sub-Total
$265,760,000.00 $270,858,359.16 $559,402.46 $269,463,830.12 $269,471,369.86 0.48%
$270,030,772.32
$559,402.46
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account 73340000 Page 12
Page 79
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
4,487.70 5,312.90 8,003,750.40 100.05 WELLS_F 8,000,000.00 912828ZX1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
0.07 0.83
1,349.98 (49,413.48) 2,986,362.50 101.75 BONY 2,935,000.00 912828XQ8US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
0.09 0.91
2,876.91 (88,749.60) 8,113,750.40 101.42 CITIGRP 8,000,000.00 912828YK0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
0.11 1.11
2,452.49 (66,933.59) 5,854,218.75 101.81 CITIGRP 5,750,000.00 912828TY6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
0.12 1.19
2,421.76 (98,437.50) 8,596,875.00 102.34 CITIGRP 8,400,000.00 912828M80US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
0.12 1.23
2,867.30 (72,265.63) 5,132,812.50 102.66 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828N30US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
0.13 1.32
1,971.56 (38,906.13) 2,476,125.12 103.17 CITIGRP 2,400,000.00 9128283U2US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
0.13 1.40
1,636.21 (32,947.65) 1,877,309.38 103.72 CITIGRP 1,810,000.00 9128284A5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
0.14 1.48
(781.25)(57,968.75) 7,142,187.50 102.03 BNP_PAR 7,000,000.00 912828P79US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
0.14 1.49
1,526.41 (12,304.44) 5,027,344.00 100.55 WELLS_F 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
0.14 1.53
1,037.60 (115,038.81) 5,214,844.00 104.30 CITIGRP 5,000,000.00 9128284L1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
0.17 1.63
(76.17)(41,835.94) 3,588,593.75 102.53 NOMURA 3,500,000.00 912828R69US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
0.17 1.72
(3,914.77)(10,156.25) 6,508,125.00 100.13 WELLS_F 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
0.18 1.79
2,966.93 3,280.95 5,993,437.20 99.89 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
0.18 1.91
(1,417.92) 1,172.12 4,992,969.00 99.86 HSBC 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
0.20 1.95
(1,010.67) 2,148.44 4,990,625.00 99.81 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
0.22 2.04
(25,358.04)(187,812.50) 8,412,500.00 105.16 RBS 8,000,000.00 9128286G0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
0.30 2.44
Account 73340000 Page 13
Page 80
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(9,778.01)(62,132.63) 3,774,850.96 104.42 MORGAN_ 3,615,000.00 912828X70US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
0.33 2.59
(8,024.32)(8,203.13) 4,998,437.50 99.97 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
0.39 2.86
(22,433.07)(99,224.71) 5,895,914.35 103.98 WELLS_F 5,670,000.00 912828Y87US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
0.37 2.85
(28,535.74)(64,453.13) 6,151,875.00 102.53 BNP_PAR 6,000,000.00 912828YE4US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
0.40 2.95
(39,976.06)(145,781.55) 6,312,187.20 105.20 CITIGRP 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
0.42 2.98
(9,973.26)(33,203.13) 2,583,593.75 103.34 CITIGRP 2,500,000.00 912828YM6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
0.44 3.09
(25,152.31)(71,093.75) 5,168,750.00 103.38 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
0.45 3.17
(58,811.87)(197,812.80) 6,465,937.20 107.77 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
0.51 3.37
(19,311.92)(22,773.44) 2,746,562.50 99.88 MORGAN_ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
0.54 3.55
(43,420.74)(40,605.47) 4,438,125.00 98.63 BNP_PAR 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
0.61 3.90
(58,701.20)(52,500.00) 6,903,750.00 98.63 JPM_CHA 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
0.61 3.90
7,397.68 11,730.47 3,848,812.50 98.69 HSBC 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
0.68 4.30
7,589.59 9,876.76 4,086,710.94 98.59 CITIGRP 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.70 4.38
1,817.83 3,046.87 5,915,625.00 98.59 RBS 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.70 4.38
(440.81) 2,173.83 2,625,984.38 99.09 CITIGRP 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
0.70 4.45
28,441.64 30,585.79 3,004,218.60 100.14 NOMURA 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
0.72 4.50
14,598.19 15,250.00 6,101,906.25 100.03 RBC 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
0.74 4.67
Account 73340000 Page 14
Page 81
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
57.35 234.37 1,986,250.00 99.31 CITIGRP 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
0.77 4.85
(12,783.02)(12,656.25) 2,979,375.00 99.31 CITIGRP 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
0.77 4.85
(1,598,397.76) 0.34 (284,404.02) 180,900,695.63 178,125,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.55
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
33,587.52 23,998.50 4,534,528.50 100.77 NEW ACC 4,500,000.00 459058FY4INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEV NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
0.11 0.41
1,286.12 1,949.17 1,743,337.02 99.90 TD 1,745,000.00 459058JV6INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
0.21 1.64
269.68 1,047.63 1,408,016.13 99.86 TD 1,410,000.00 459058JM6INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
0.31 2.23
(5,332.78)(15,211.50) 1,561,738.50 104.12 MORGAN_ 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
0.57 3.42
11,783.80 0.24 29,810.54 9,247,620.15 9,155,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.42
Municipal Bond / Note
3,394.53 2,050.00 504,350.00 100.87 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QR2SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
0.21 0.92
6,975.95 5,615.00 509,000.00 101.80 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QS0SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
0.32 1.90
7,665.00 0.27 10,370.48 1,013,350.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.41
Federal Agency Bond / Note
3,025.63 2,628.42 4,263,821.22 100.09 MORGAN_ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
0.20 1.86
Account 73340000 Page 15
Page 82
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Bond / Note
733.42 (187.20) 4,802,740.80 100.06 KEYBANC 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
0.22 2.02
1,420.60 1,839.40 1,700,309.40 100.02 CITIGRP 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
0.24 2.18
4,558.51 5,838.80 4,400,822.80 100.02 NOMURA 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
0.24 2.24
(11,488.45)(50,394.05) 3,479,400.45 103.86 RBS 3,350,000.00 3135G0X24FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
0.46 3.27
(15,013.07)(17,148.00) 3,992,252.00 99.81 NEW ACC 4,000,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
0.55 3.76
(23,993.18)(27,485.00) 4,990,315.00 99.81 HSBC 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
0.55 3.76
(19,764.58)(21,366.00) 2,985,744.00 99.52 NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
0.63 3.80
(6,082.89)(5,860.00) 2,493,140.00 99.73 07/21/22NEW ACC 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
0.70 0.89
(11,712.93)(9,746.00) 1,978,754.00 98.94 NOMURA 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
0.65 3.96
(20,188.77)(18,894.50) 2,274,182.50 98.88 CITIGRP 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
0.66 4.03
(8,705.74)(8,340.00) 1,379,380.40 99.24 BMO 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
0.69 4.14
(29,678.79)(28,845.00) 4,465,620.00 99.24 JEFFERI 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
0.69 4.14
(177,959.13) 0.47 (136,890.24) 43,206,482.57 43,200,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.03
Corporate Note
3,524.89 3,524.89 458,524.89 100.77 01/06/22NEW ACC 455,000.00 594918BW3MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
0.61 0.35
101,165.34 162,603.00 3,076,443.00 102.55 11/15/22NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 931142DU4WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE)
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
0.37 1.19
Account 73340000 Page 16
Page 83
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
137,648.37 161,770.80 3,510,345.00 103.55 NEW ACC 3,390,000.00 037833AK6APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
0.27 1.64
9,645.38 7,577.28 1,452,314.88 100.86 NEW ACC 1,440,000.00 037833DV9APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
0.24 1.69
163,251.86 153,117.00 3,172,257.00 105.74 12/09/23NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 037833CG3APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
0.63 2.21
4,499.10 4,549.38 664,219.38 100.64 02/18/24CSFB 660,000.00 808513BN4CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
0.50 2.44
1,576.94 1,794.02 1,454,669.72 99.98 JPM_CHA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
0.46 2.68
426.80 426.80 440,426.80 100.10 08/12/22DEUTSCH 440,000.00 904764BN6UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024
0.59 2.93
2,602.48 2,603.33 517,556.98 100.50 GOLDMAN 515,000.00 05565EBU8BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
0.58 2.92
(5,961.91)(33,940.00) 2,606,510.00 104.26 12/20/24US_BANC 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
0.77 3.21
(17,864.40)(49,047.00) 3,095,703.00 103.19 01/14/25US_BANC 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
0.81 3.29
(2,911.53)(2,911.53) 607,088.47 99.52 02/16/24JPM_CHA 610,000.00 46647PBY1JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
0.70 2.45
9,203.24 (5,628.80) 1,709,235.20 106.83 12/01/24MERRILL 1,600,000.00 539830BE8LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
0.92 3.09
7,703.46 (10,414.40) 1,746,881.60 109.18 SUSQ 1,600,000.00 369550BG2GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
0.97 3.49
(12,567.82)(12,452.15) 1,671,553.70 99.20 12/28/25MITSU 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
0.94 4.26
Account 73340000 Page 17
Page 84
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(17,682.21)(18,099.40) 1,885,776.60 99.25 MERRILL 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
1.03 4.37
365,473.22 0.64 384,259.99 28,069,506.22 27,250,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.64
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
5,660.73 5,660.73 250,660.73 102.31 NEW ACC 245,000.00 949763S64WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
0.26 1.40
5,468.89 5,468.89 250,468.89 102.23 NEW ACC 245,000.00 61760A6Q7MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
0.27 1.40
(585.30)(585.30) 244,414.70 99.76 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
0.53 2.88
(1,755.67)(1,755.67) 243,244.33 99.28 NEW ACC 245,000.00 169894AT9CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
0.69 3.87
(1,287.72)(1,287.72) 243,712.28 99.47 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
0.69 3.87
7,500.93 0.49 7,500.93 1,232,500.93 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.67
Asset-Backed Security
21.76 25.40 180,007.20 100.00 MITSU 180,000.00 58770GAC4MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
0.25 1.33
620.04 623.70 280,600.40 100.21 SOCGEN 280,000.00 44891TAD8HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
0.35 1.76
114.33 124.42 515,046.66 100.01 RBC 515,000.00 36261RAD0GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
0.33 1.73
(297.21)(296.00) 529,694.30 99.94 JPM_CHA 530,000.00 43813GAC5HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
0.29 1.44
94.14 98.61 540,041.80 100.01 BARCLAY 540,000.00 44933LAC7HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
0.38 1.94
488.17 495.90 375,436.20 100.12 DEUTSCH 375,000.00 36261LAC5GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
0.32 1.43
Account 73340000 Page 18
Page 85
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
(5,413.71)(5,412.93) 919,552.20 99.41 MITSU 925,000.00 50117XAE2KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
0.70 2.71
(128.71)(125.82) 119,850.47 99.88 MITSU 120,000.00 14316NAC3CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
0.37 1.53
1,654.62 1,667.79 811,493.24 100.18 MERRILL 810,000.00 14314QAC8CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
0.48 2.18
(261.37)(256.43) 1,529,491.89 99.97 RBC 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
0.56 2.52
(3,055.36) 0.47 (3,107.94) 5,801,214.36 5,805,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.11
265,760,000.00 269,471,369.86 (1,386,989.30) 7,539.74 0.40 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.59
Total Investments $270,030,772.32
$559,402.46
$269,471,369.86
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $265,760,000.00 ($1,386,989.30)$7,539.74 0.40% 2.59
Account 73340000 Page 19
Page 86
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
08/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 (2,992,031.25)(152.85)(2,992,184.10) 3,000,000.00 08/02/21
08/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
91282CCL3 (5,006,640.63)(968.07)(5,007,608.70) 5,000,000.00 08/02/21
08/09/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 (1,986,015.63)(305.71)(1,986,321.34) 2,000,000.00 08/06/21
08/09/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 (5,912,578.13)(550.27)(5,913,128.40) 6,000,000.00 08/06/21
08/09/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
91282CCN9 (5,990,156.25)(183.42)(5,990,339.67) 6,000,000.00 08/06/21
08/12/21 BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
05565EBU8 (514,953.65) 0.00 (514,953.65) 515,000.00 08/09/21
08/12/21 UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024
904764BN6 (440,000.00) 0.00 (440,000.00) 440,000.00 08/09/21
(2,160.32)(22,844,535.86)(22,842,375.54) 22,955,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
08/01/21 SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA
TXBL GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
799055QS0 0.00 3,165.00 3,165.00 500,000.00 08/01/21
08/01/21 SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA
TXBL GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
799055QR2 0.00 2,905.00 2,905.00 500,000.00 08/01/21
08/02/21 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 116.95 116.95 0.00 08/02/21
08/06/21 MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
594918BW3 0.00 5,460.00 5,460.00 455,000.00 08/06/21
08/09/21 APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
037833CG3 0.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 3,000,000.00 08/09/21
08/12/21 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
38141GXS8 0.00 8,122.50 8,122.50 1,900,000.00 08/12/21
Account 73340000 Page 20
Page 87
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
08/14/21 NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
66989HAP3 0.00 26,250.00 26,250.00 3,000,000.00 08/14/21
08/15/21 HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
44891TAD8 0.00 98.00 98.00 280,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 0.00 171.00 171.00 540,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
50117XAE2 0.00 244.61 244.61 925,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
58770GAC4 0.00 37.50 37.50 180,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 0.00 34.00 34.00 120,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 0.00 351.00 351.00 810,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
91282CAF8 0.00 3,125.00 3,125.00 5,000,000.00 08/15/21
08/15/21 CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
14317DAC4 0.00 397.38 397.38 1,530,000.00 08/15/21
08/16/21 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
46647PBY1 0.00 1,717.15 1,717.15 610,000.00 08/16/21
08/16/21 GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
36261LAC5 0.00 109.38 109.38 375,000.00 08/16/21
08/20/21 GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
36261RAD0 0.00 141.63 141.63 515,000.00 08/20/21
08/21/21 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 0.00 119.25 119.25 530,000.00 08/21/21
08/24/21 ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
29278TQD5 0.00 93.64 93.64 245,000.00 08/24/21
08/25/21 FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 0.00 3,750.00 3,750.00 2,000,000.00 08/25/21
08/29/21 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
169894AT9 0.00 104.04 104.04 245,000.00 08/29/21
Account 73340000 Page 21
Page 88
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
08/29/21 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
949763S64 0.00 395.36 395.36 245,000.00 08/29/21
08/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 114.45 114.45 245,000.00 08/30/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 0.00 6,625.00 6,625.00 2,650,000.00 08/31/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
9128284A5 0.00 23,756.25 23,756.25 1,810,000.00 08/31/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
9128283Z1 0.00 82,500.00 82,500.00 6,000,000.00 08/31/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
912828P79 0.00 52,500.00 52,500.00 7,000,000.00 08/31/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
912828YE4 0.00 37,500.00 37,500.00 6,000,000.00 08/31/21
08/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
9128286G0 0.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 8,000,000.00 08/31/21
399,904.09 399,904.09 0.00 55,210,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
MATURITY
08/01/21 SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA
TXBL GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.062% 08/01/2021
799055QQ4 475,000.00 2,522.25 477,522.25 (1,197.00) 0.00 475,000.00 08/01/21
2,522.25 0.00 (1,197.00) 477,522.25 475,000.00 475,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
08/03/21 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 06/29/2017 1.925% 06/29/2022
3134GBVA7 508,300.00 909.03 509,209.03 8,300.00 8,300.00 FIFO 500,000.00 08/02/21
08/03/21 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
3133EHHH9 4,055,440.00 19,413.33 4,074,853.33 63,440.00 56,631.68 FIFO 4,000,000.00 08/02/21
08/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/01/2015 1.875% 05/31/2022
912828XD7 3,044,882.81 9,836.07 3,054,718.88 (34,335.94) 2,604.72 FIFO 3,000,000.00 08/02/21
08/12/21 FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
3135G0X24 1,012,079.25 1,540.36 1,013,619.61 (15,249.00)(4,595.75)FIFO 975,000.00 08/10/21
Account 73340000 Page 22
Page 89
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
31,698.79 62,940.65 22,155.06 8,652,400.85 8,620,702.06 8,475,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(13,746,673.48) 431,964.81 (13,314,708.67) 20,958.06 62,940.65 Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions $20,958.06 ($13,314,708.67)$431,964.81 ($13,746,673.48)$62,940.65
Account 73340000 Page 23
Page 90
Trustee and/orPurchase Maturity CostBond Issue/DescriptionPaying AgentAccount NameTrust Account #FundInvestmentDateDate*YieldValueAssessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo Improvement Fund 16913302 101 Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A 0.01% 301,282.77$ Masi PlazaReserve Fund 16913301 841 Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A 0.01% 242,500.00$ Redemp. Fund 16913300 841 Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A 0.01% 211,252.06$ 755,034.83$ CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 1 (2013) Wells Fargo Reserve Fund 46571801 865 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 1,416,993.14$ Agency Project 46571807 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 77,811.40$ Cultural Center Fund 46571808 615 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 191,843.27$ Bond Fund 46571800 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 822,828.13$ Developer Project 46571806 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 98,092.12$ Special Tax 46571805 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 77.15$ 2,607,645.21$ CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 2 (2013) Wells Fargo Bond Fund 46659800 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 155,703.00$ Reserve Fund 46659801 867 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 132,473.06$ Special Tax Fund 46659805 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 7.23$ 288,183.29$ CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Series Wells Fargo Admin Expense Fund 48436802 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% -$ Bond Fund 48436800 820 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% 1,802,738.00Reserve Fund 48436801 821 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% 1,187,360.17Special Tax Fund 48436807 820 Money Market Fund N/A 64.73Project Fund 48436809 617 Money Market Fund N/A 44,980.733,035,143.63$ 2014 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund 48709906 Money Market Fund N/A -$ Bond Fund 48709900 858 Money Market Fund N/A 409,755.50 Reserve Fund 48709901 859 Money Market Fund N/A 260,752.22 Sepcial Tax Fund 48709907 858 Money Market Fund N/A 14.19 Rebate Fund 48709908 Money Market Fund N/A - Redemption Fund 48709903 Money Market Fund N/A - Prepayment Fund 48709904 Money Market Fund N/A - 670,521.91$ 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds Wells Fargo Bond Fund 82631600 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 0.56$ Interest 82631601 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 0.98 Principal 82631602 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 1.71 Acquisition and Construciton - Series A 82631605 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 7,632,862.28 Acquisition and Construciton - Series B 82631606 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 2,294,226.19 Cost of Issuance 82631607 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A - City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal AgentsFor the Month Ended8/31/2021\\RCV00117\Departments\FINANCE\KATHERINE\Fiscal Agent Stmts\_Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook Template.xlsx - Shortcut.xlsx Summary ReportPage 1 Page 91
Trustee and/orPurchase Maturity CostBond Issue/DescriptionPaying AgentAccount NameTrust Account #FundInvestmentDateDate*YieldValueCity of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal AgentsFor the Month Ended8/31/20219,927,091.72$ Escrow Acct - Day Creek Villas Sr. Affordable Housing Chase Bank City of Rancho Cucamonga 389918209 396 Money Market Fund 4/24/2019 N/A 0.00$ 0.00$ CFD No. 2000-01 South Etiwanda Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-1 AGY 6712140200 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140201 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 10,652.370 Bond Fund 6712140202 852 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 49,690.50 Prepayment Fund 6712140203 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140204 853 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 12,100.00 72,442.87$ CFD No. 2000-02 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-2 AGY 6712140300 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140301 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 91,569.62$ Bond Fund 6712140302 856 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 459,791.75$ Prepayment Fund 6712140303 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Reserve Fund 6712140304 857 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 117,350.00 668,711.37$ CFD No. 2001-01 IA 1&2, Series A Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140400 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140401 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 186,189.56 Bond Fund 6712140402 860 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 505,187.25 Prepayment Fund 6712140403 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140404 861 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 117,350.00 808,726.81$ CFD No. 2001-01 IA3, Series B Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140500 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140501 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 3,223.06 Bond Fund 6712140502 862 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 49,318.75 Prepayment Fund 6712140503 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140504 863 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 26,250.00 78,791.81$ CFD No. 2006-01 Vintner's Grove Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-1 AGY 6712140600 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140601 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 304.34 Bond Fund 6712140602 869 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 197,132.40 Prepayment Fund 6712140603 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140604 870 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 130,466.80 327,903.54$ \\RCV00117\Departments\FINANCE\KATHERINE\Fiscal Agent Stmts\_Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook Template.xlsx - Shortcut.xlsx Summary ReportPage 2 Page 92
Trustee and/orPurchase Maturity CostBond Issue/DescriptionPaying AgentAccount NameTrust Account #FundInvestmentDateDate*YieldValueCity of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal AgentsFor the Month Ended8/31/2021CFD No. 2006-02 Amador on Rt. 66 Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-2 AGY 6712140700 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140701 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 1,190.49 Bond Fund 6712140702 871 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 118,338.40 Prepayment Fund 6712140703 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140704 872 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 78,281.60 197,810.49$ 19,438,007.48 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS19,438,007.48$ * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.\\RCV00117\Departments\FINANCE\KATHERINE\Fiscal Agent Stmts\_Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook Template.xlsx - Shortcut.xlsx Summary ReportPage 3 Page 93
Page 94
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
1,480,798.87 2.25 Corporate Note
488,126.98 0.74 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
2,383,731.19 3.63 Commercial Paper
2,412,212.55 3.67 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
18,156,332.65 27.63 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
40,324,874.41 61.36 Local Agency Investment Fund
475,990.45 0.72 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$65,722,067.10 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFM Managed Account 31,822.36 24,921,202.24
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 40,324,874.41
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 475,990.45
$31,822.36 $65,722,067.10 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
40,800,864.86
0.00
794,794.10
1,588,937.09
0.00
5,837,562.33
5,628,580.33
5,112,691.97
5,958,636.42
0.00
62.08
0.00
1.21
2.42
0.00
8.88
8.56
7.78
9.07
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $65,722,067.10
387
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
2.25%
Corporate Note
0.74%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
3.63%
Commercial Paper
3.67%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
27.63%
US TSY Bond / Note
61.36%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
0.72%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1
Page 95
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$24,975,928.40
0.00
(1,013,430.00)
998,359.38
0.00
(39,655.54)
$24,921,202.24
16,422.93
(30.57)
15,430.00
$31,822.36
Total
24,940,617.71
65,494.82
1,018,603.33
0.00
11,249.60
(998,389.95)
(24,955,707.93)
(58,914.84)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $22,952.74
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
0.00
1,018,603.33
11,249.60
0.00
(998,389.95)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$54,614.38 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340100 Page 1
Page 96
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 17,815,000.00 18,156,332.65 72.85
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 2,445,000.00 2,412,212.55 9.68
Corporate Note 1,380,000.00 1,480,798.87 5.94
Commercial Paper 2,385,000.00 2,383,731.19 9.57
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 490,000.00 488,126.98 1.96
Managed Account Sub-Total 24,515,000.00 24,921,202.24 100.00%
Accrued Interest 65,494.82
Total Portfolio 24,515,000.00 24,986,697.06
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
1.96%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
9.57%
Commercial Paper
5.94%
Corporate Note
9.68%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
72.85%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
9.56%
0.00%
23.42%22.59%
20.52%
23.91%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1019
0.43%
0.45%
Account 73340100 Page 2
Page 97
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
2.22%
A-
9.57%
A-1
1.51%
AA
72.84%
AA+
9.68%
AAA
2.22%
BBB+
1.96%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
376,371.75 1.51 AMAZON.COM INC
181,611.87 0.73 BANK OF AMERICA CO
186,146.60 0.75 CITIGROUP INC
244,414.70 0.98 ENERBANK USA
182,160.50 0.73 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
2,412,212.55 9.68 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
370,627.20 1.49 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
794,407.73 3.19 LMA AMERICAS LLC
243,712.28 0.98 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
794,529.36 3.19 MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC
183,880.95 0.74 MORGAN STANLEY
794,794.10 3.19 RABOBANK NEDERLAND
18,156,332.65 72.84 UNITED STATES TREASURY
$24,921,202.24 Total 100.00%
Account 73340100 Page 3
Page 98
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022
2,440,381.13 2,440,392.11 775.00 2,440,476.56 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,440,000.00 91282CAX9 0.11
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023
2,398,275.00 2,398,645.55 16,036.78 2,414,591.02 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,295,000.00 9128284S6 0.16
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
998,906.20 998,411.72 108.70 998,359.38 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023
2,392,775.00 2,394,293.28 16,510.04 2,410,342.97 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,260,000.00 9128285P1 0.22
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
2,443,109.38 2,445,734.11 1,814.20 2,445,310.55 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,450,000.00 91282CCC3 0.31
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
548,281.25 548,421.46 293.03 548,367.19 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 550,000.00 91282CCG4 0.35
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
2,424,143.75 2,424,956.61 8,937.91 2,431,563.48 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,345,000.00 912828YV6 0.44
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
2,444,835.94 2,445,679.54 1,572.23 2,443,579.10 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,475,000.00 912828ZT0 0.57
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
1,000,937.50 998,189.14 2,527.17 998,085.94 05/27/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CBW0 0.79
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026
1,064,687.50 1,066,508.34 5,399.59 1,067,851.56 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 9128286X3 0.70
53,974.65 18,156,332.65 18,161,231.86 0.35 18,198,527.75 17,815,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026
2,412,212.55 2,424,224.99 927.06 2,422,970.55 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAAA 2,445,000.00 459058JS3 0.85
927.06 2,412,212.55 2,424,224.99 0.85 2,422,970.55 2,445,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Account 73340100 Page 4
Page 99
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026
183,880.95 183,895.19 603.85 185,034.30 05/27/2105/25/21A1BBB+ 165,000.00 61746BDZ6 1.19
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES
(CALL
DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026
182,160.50 182,474.36 103.13 183,570.75 05/27/2105/25/21A2BBB+ 165,000.00 38143U8H7 1.30
JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026
370,627.20 371,646.05 4,675.00 373,585.20 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 340,000.00 46625HQW3 1.20
BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026
181,611.87 181,931.28 2,117.50 182,902.50 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 165,000.00 06051GFX2 1.21
CITIGROUP CORP NOTES
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
186,146.60 186,191.65 1,926.67 187,113.90 05/27/2105/25/21A3BBB+ 170,000.00 172967KN0 1.29
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026
376,371.75 375,337.17 1,135.42 375,356.25 05/27/2105/25/21A1AA 375,000.00 023135BX3 0.98
10,561.57 1,480,798.87 1,481,475.70 1.17 1,487,562.90 1,380,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Commercial Paper
COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA COMM
PAPER
DTD 04/28/2021 0.000% 11/29/2021
794,794.10 794,764.15 0.00 794,504.45 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 21687AYV9 0.12
LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022
794,407.73 794,484.14 0.00 794,137.87 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 53944RAR9 0.16
MUFG BANK LTD/NY COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 02/18/2022
794,529.36 794,436.87 0.00 794,112.25 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 62479MBJ1 0.15
0.00 2,383,731.19 2,383,685.16 0.14 2,382,754.57 2,385,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
244,414.70 245,000.00 24.16 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45
Account 73340100 Page 5
Page 100
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
243,712.28 245,000.00 7.38 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55
31.54 488,126.98 490,000.00 0.50 490,000.00 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
24,515,000.00 24,981,815.77 0.43 65,494.82 24,940,617.71 24,921,202.24 Managed Account Sub-Total
$24,515,000.00 $24,981,815.77 $65,494.82 $24,940,617.71 $24,921,202.24 0.43%
$24,986,697.06
$65,494.82
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account 73340100 Page 6
Page 101
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(10.98)(95.43) 2,440,381.13 100.02 HSBC 2,440,000.00 91282CAX9US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022
0.11 1.25
(370.55)(16,316.02) 2,398,275.00 104.50 HSBC 2,295,000.00 9128284S6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023
0.17 1.71
494.48 546.82 998,906.20 99.89 MERRILL 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
0.18 1.91
(1,518.28)(17,567.97) 2,392,775.00 105.88 CITIGRP 2,260,000.00 9128285P1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023
0.25 2.18
(2,624.73)(2,201.17) 2,443,109.38 99.72 BARCLAY 2,450,000.00 91282CCC3US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
0.35 2.70
(140.21)(85.94) 548,281.25 99.69 MERRILL 550,000.00 91282CCG4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
0.36 2.78
(812.86)(7,419.73) 2,424,143.75 103.38 GOLDMAN 2,345,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
0.45 3.17
(843.60) 1,256.84 2,444,835.94 98.78 WELLS_F 2,475,000.00 912828ZT0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
0.58 3.73
2,748.36 2,851.56 1,000,937.50 100.09 BNP_PAR 1,000,000.00 91282CBW0US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
0.73 4.58
(1,820.84)(3,164.06) 1,064,687.50 106.47 CITIGRP 1,000,000.00 9128286X3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026
0.74 4.53
(42,195.10) 0.36 (4,899.21) 18,156,332.65 17,815,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.68
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
(12,012.44)(10,758.00) 2,412,212.55 98.66 11/10/21KEYBANC 2,445,000.00 459058JS3INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026
0.96 0.20
(10,758.00) 0.96 (12,012.44) 2,412,212.55 2,445,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.20
Corporate Note
(14.24)(1,153.35) 183,880.95 111.44 BNP_PAR 165,000.00 61746BDZ6MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026
1.20 4.10
Account 73340100 Page 7
Page 102
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(313.86)(1,410.25) 182,160.50 110.40 11/25/25JPM_CHA 165,000.00 38143U8H7GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES
(CALL
DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026
1.35 3.97
(1,018.85)(2,958.00) 370,627.20 109.01 01/01/26JSEB 340,000.00 46625HQW3JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026
1.27 4.04
(319.41)(1,290.63) 181,611.87 110.07 FIFTH_3 165,000.00 06051GFX2BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026
1.26 4.29
(45.05)(967.30) 186,146.60 109.50 JPM_CHA 170,000.00 172967KN0CITIGROUP CORP NOTES
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
1.30 4.33
1,034.58 1,015.50 376,371.75 100.37 UBS 375,000.00 023135BX3AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026
0.92 4.59
(6,764.03) 1.18 (676.83) 1,480,798.87 1,380,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 4.25
Commercial Paper
29.95 289.65 794,794.10 99.97 RBC 795,000.00 21687AYV9COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA COMM
PAPER
DTD 04/28/2021 0.000% 11/29/2021
0.10 0.25
(76.41) 269.86 794,407.73 99.93 JPM_CHA 795,000.00 53944RAR9LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022
0.18 0.41
92.49 417.11 794,529.36 99.94 MITSU 795,000.00 62479MBJ1MUFG BANK LTD/NY COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 02/18/2022
0.12 0.48
976.62 0.13 46.03 2,383,731.19 2,385,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.38
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
(585.30)(585.30) 244,414.70 99.76 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
0.53 2.88
(1,287.72)(1,287.72) 243,712.28 99.47 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
0.69 3.87
(1,873.02) 0.61 (1,873.02) 488,126.98 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.38
24,515,000.00 24,921,202.24 (60,613.53)(19,415.47) 0.45 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.32
Account 73340100 Page 8
Page 103
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Total Investments $24,986,697.06
$65,494.82
$24,921,202.24
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $24,515,000.00 ($60,613.53)($19,415.47) 0.45% 2.32
Account 73340100 Page 9
Page 104
For the Month Ending August 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
08/09/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
91282CCN9 (998,359.38)(30.57)(998,389.95) 1,000,000.00 08/06/21
(30.57)(998,389.95)(998,359.38) 1,000,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
08/02/21 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 1.51 1.51 0.00 08/02/21
08/10/21 INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026
459058JS3 0.00 7,946.25 7,946.25 2,445,000.00 08/10/21
08/24/21 ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
29278TQD5 0.00 93.64 93.64 245,000.00 08/24/21
08/25/21 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP
NOTES (CALL
DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026
38143U8H7 0.00 3,093.75 3,093.75 165,000.00 08/25/21
08/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 114.45 114.45 245,000.00 08/30/21
11,249.60 11,249.60 0.00 3,100,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
08/09/21 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
3133EHHH9 1,013,430.00 5,173.33 1,018,603.33 15,430.00 13,721.35 FIFO 1,000,000.00 08/06/21
5,173.33 13,721.35 15,430.00 1,018,603.33 1,013,430.00 1,000,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
15,070.62 16,392.36 31,462.98 15,430.00 13,721.35 Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions $15,430.00 $31,462.98 $16,392.36 $15,070.62 $13,721.35
Account 73340100 Page 10
Page 105
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of
September 30, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive
and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of September 30, 2021.
BACKGROUND:
The attached investment schedules as of September 30, 2021 reflect cash and investments
managed by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with
the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District’s adopted Investment Policies
as approved on June 28, 2021.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s and District’s Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to
the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days
following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers
have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council’s core value of providing and
nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of
the City’s investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the
various services the City provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Investment Schedule (City)
Attachment 2 – Investment Schedule (Fire)
Page 106
Page 107
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
5,801,624.22 1.74 Asset-Backed Security
38,474,839.98 11.51 Federal Agency Bond / Note
32,554,193.39 9.74 Corporate Note
1,233,434.63 0.37 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
1,011,130.00 0.30 Municipal Bond / Note
12,980,349.88 3.88 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
176,923,817.02 52.96 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
60,845,226.58 18.21 Local Agency Investment Fund
4,306,549.99 1.29 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$334,131,165.69 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFM Managed Account 39,251.45 268,979,389.12
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 60,845,226.58
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 4,306,549.99
$39,251.45 $334,131,165.69 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
65,151,776.57
0.00
0.00
4,984,526.67
7,986,514.07
95,231,587.06
47,188,549.15
65,588,764.20
47,999,447.97
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
1.49
2.39
28.50
14.12
19.63
14.37
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $334,131,165.69
785
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
1.74%
ABS
11.51%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
9.74%
Corporate Note
0.37%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
0.30%
Muni Bond / Note
3.88%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
52.96%
US TSY Bond / Note
18.21%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
1.29%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1
Page 108
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$269,471,369.86
0.00
(11,929,238.36)
12,379,975.20
0.00
(942,717.58)
$268,979,389.12
162,702.39
(25,596.29)
(97,854.65)
$39,251.45
Total
269,741,221.09
670,326.84
11,942,392.27
0.00
149,548.48
(12,405,571.49)
(269,463,830.12)
(559,402.46)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $74,684.61
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
0.00
11,942,392.27
149,548.48
0.00
(12,405,571.49)
(0.01)
0.00
Cash Balance
$424,338.33 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340000 Page 1
Page 109
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 174,870,000.00 176,923,817.02 65.77
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 12,910,000.00 12,980,349.88 4.83
Municipal Bond / Note 1,000,000.00 1,011,130.00 0.38
Federal Agency Bond / Note 38,745,000.00 38,474,839.98 14.30
Corporate Note 31,705,000.00 32,554,193.39 12.10
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 1,225,000.00 1,233,434.63 0.46
Asset-Backed Security 5,805,000.00 5,801,624.22 2.16
Managed Account Sub-Total 266,260,000.00 268,979,389.12 100.00%
Accrued Interest 670,326.84
Total Portfolio 266,260,000.00 269,649,715.96
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
2.16%
ABS
0.46%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
12.10%
Corporate Note
14.30%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
0.38%
Muni Bond / Note
4.83%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
65.77%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
1.86%2.97%
35.40%
17.54%
24.38%
17.85%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 975
0.50%
0.50%
Account 73340000 Page 2
Page 110
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
1.06%
A
0.57%
A+
2.80%
A-
1.68%
AA
83.47%
AA+
2.11%
AA-
6.42%
AAA
0.70%
BBB+
1.19%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
1,452,095.82 0.54 AMAZON.COM INC
8,114,769.54 3.02 APPLE INC
1,671,683.50 0.62 ASTRAZENECA PLC
515,740.57 0.19 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA LLC
2,459,703.52 0.91 CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST
662,399.10 0.25 CHARLES SCHWAB
243,842.62 0.09 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
244,797.14 0.09 ENERBANK USA
26,745,831.88 9.94 FANNIE MAE
2,970,729.00 1.10 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
8,758,279.10 3.26 FREDDIE MAC
1,735,128.00 0.65 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
375,072.98 0.14 GM FINANCIAL CONSUMER AUTOMOBILE TRUST
514,711.24 0.19 GM FINANCIAL LEASINGTRUST
1,878,754.20 0.70 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
529,314.82 0.20 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES
280,272.47 0.10 HYUNDAI AUTO LEASE SECURITIZATION TRUST
539,658.77 0.20 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES
1,825,341.30 0.68 IBM CORP
5,303,837.26 1.97 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
7,676,512.62 2.85 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
606,943.90 0.23 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
922,850.73 0.34 KUBOTA CREDIT OWNER TRUST
1,701,550.40 0.63 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
244,300.53 0.09 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
180,039.69 0.07 MERCEDES-BENZ AUTO LEASE TRUST
457,531.17 0.17 MICROSOFT CORP
250,152.60 0.09 MORGAN STANLEY
3,078,879.00 1.14 NOVARTIS AG
1,011,130.00 0.38 SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
1,659,659.29 0.62 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION
1,099,283.84 0.41 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP
Account 73340000 Page 3
Page 111
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
440,683.76 0.16 UNILEVER PLC
176,923,817.02 65.79 UNITED STATES TREASURY
2,584,030.00 0.96 US BANCORP
3,069,720.00 1.14 WAL-MART STORES INC
250,341.74 0.09 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
$268,979,389.12 Total 100.00%
Account 73340000 Page 4
Page 112
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
4,501,406.25 4,499,626.46 1,421.54 4,499,121.09 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 912828ZX1 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
2,981,317.82 2,980,506.89 9,889.67 3,035,775.98 09/28/2009/28/20AaaAA+ 2,935,000.00 912828XQ8 0.13
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
8,105,000.00 8,102,740.96 50,792.35 8,202,500.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 912828YK0 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
5,847,031.25 5,844,827.65 35,292.97 5,921,152.34 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 5,750,000.00 912828TY6 0.15
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
8,583,750.00 8,581,632.15 56,459.02 8,695,312.50 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 8,400,000.00 912828M80 0.14
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
5,123,437.50 5,121,923.89 26,851.22 5,205,078.13 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828N30 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
2,470,874.88 2,469,850.65 9,603.26 2,515,031.25 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,400,000.00 9128283U2 0.19
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
1,872,501.47 1,872,058.14 4,068.75 1,910,257.03 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 1,810,000.00 9128284A5 0.19
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
7,131,250.00 7,135,098.91 8,991.71 7,200,156.25 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 912828P79 0.13
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
5,023,437.50 5,024,434.50 1,104.97 5,039,648.44 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5 0.16
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
5,200,781.00 5,203,221.92 57,540.76 5,329,882.81 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 9128284L1 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
3,581,484.20 3,584,493.94 19,113.73 3,630,429.69 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,500,000.00 912828R69 0.17
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
6,502,031.25 6,511,485.80 4,795.08 6,518,281.25 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7 0.15
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
5,986,875.00 5,990,879.85 1,263.59 5,990,156.25 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21
Account 73340000 Page 5
Page 113
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
4,988,281.00 4,994,623.10 798.23 4,991,796.88 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8 0.18
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
4,985,156.00 4,991,972.94 276.24 4,988,476.56 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
8,382,500.00 8,423,439.00 16,270.72 8,600,312.50 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 9128286G0 0.18
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
3,761,859.38 3,779,393.51 30,255.98 3,836,983.59 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,615,000.00 912828X70 0.23
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
4,985,937.50 5,006,276.84 3,974.18 5,006,640.63 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3 0.33
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
5,873,765.63 5,911,345.15 16,717.26 5,995,139.06 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,670,000.00 912828Y87 0.24
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024
3,986,250.00 3,996,347.49 1,915.76 3,996,250.00 09/03/2109/01/21AaaAA+ 4,000,000.00 91282CCT6 0.41
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
2,293,758.71 2,310,654.27 2,403.14 2,325,942.78 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 2,245,000.00 912828YE4 0.24
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
6,285,937.20 6,342,772.24 350.27 6,457,968.75 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
2,573,437.50 2,591,138.80 15,692.93 2,616,796.88 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 912828YM6 0.31
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
5,146,875.00 5,188,997.53 25,204.92 5,239,843.75 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828YV6 0.30
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
6,429,375.00 6,512,411.71 14,129.83 6,663,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1 0.23
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
2,735,390.63 2,765,510.05 37.77 2,769,335.94 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0 0.34
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
4,414,218.75 4,481,933.17 1,895.38 4,478,730.47 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7 0.36
Account 73340000 Page 6
Page 114
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
6,866,562.50 6,963,239.49 2,948.37 6,956,250.00 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7 0.39
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
3,822,000.00 3,842,525.79 3,695.99 3,837,082.03 05/07/2105/06/21AaaAA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4 0.73
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
4,056,271.30 4,080,346.62 2,618.78 4,076,834.18 07/07/2107/06/21AaaAA+ 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3 0.74
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
5,871,562.80 5,915,410.26 3,790.76 5,912,578.13 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3 0.71
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
2,605,281.25 2,626,856.17 1,134.67 2,623,810.55 03/03/2103/02/21AaaAA+ 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3 0.70
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
2,979,375.00 2,976,211.58 61.81 2,973,632.81 04/06/2104/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7 0.93
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
6,048,531.25 6,087,527.77 15,375.00 6,086,656.25 06/04/2106/02/21AaaAA+ 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6 0.79
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
1,968,125.00 1,986,423.54 2,105.98 1,986,015.63 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.77
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
2,952,187.50 2,992,289.15 3,158.97 2,992,031.25 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.68
452,001.56 176,923,817.02 177,690,427.88 0.31 179,105,641.63 174,870,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
4,526,995.50 4,500,748.94 16,250.00 4,510,530.00 07/26/1707/26/17AaaAAA 4,500,000.00 459058FY4 1.95
INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
1,742,197.53 1,742,199.35 975.50 1,741,387.85 04/20/2104/13/21AaaAAA 1,745,000.00 459058JV6 0.23
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
1,407,319.59 1,407,829.50 1,243.54 1,406,968.50 11/24/2011/17/20AaaAAA 1,410,000.00 459058JM6 0.32
Account 73340000 Page 7
Page 115
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
3,748,995.76 3,752,241.58 417.22 3,752,221.30 09/23/2109/15/21AaaAAA 3,755,000.00 4581X0DZ8 0.52
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
1,554,841.50 1,565,511.49 1,239.58 1,576,950.00 02/23/2102/19/21AaaAAA 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1 0.47
20,125.84 12,980,349.88 12,968,530.86 0.95 12,988,057.65 12,910,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
503,790.00 500,869.65 968.33 502,300.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QR2 0.95
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
507,340.00 501,937.18 1,055.00 503,385.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QS0 1.05
2,023.33 1,011,130.00 1,002,806.83 1.00 1,005,685.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
4,260,426.00 4,260,760.34 2,396.25 4,261,192.80 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4 0.24
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
4,796,817.60 4,801,925.67 766.67 4,802,928.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5 0.23
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
1,697,359.90 1,698,930.68 1,711.81 1,698,470.00 11/05/2011/03/20AaaAA+ 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8 0.28
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
4,392,977.60 4,396,401.47 3,788.89 4,394,984.00 11/25/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1 0.29
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
2,873,362.77 2,900,144.20 4,181.67 2,901,803.25 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 2,895,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.45
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
4,962,630.00 5,013,998.26 7,222.22 5,017,800.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.42
Account 73340000 Page 8
Page 116
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
2,970,729.00 3,005,390.54 3,708.33 3,007,110.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71 0.45
FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
2,482,525.00 2,499,239.32 3,038.19 2,499,000.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5 0.63
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
1,970,146.00 1,990,663.63 750.00 1,988,500.00 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7 0.50
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
2,264,101.60 2,294,485.13 191.67 2,293,077.00 09/25/2009/23/20AaaAA+ 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3 0.44
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
1,369,649.01 1,388,123.71 2,780.00 1,387,720.40 11/13/2011/12/20AaaAA+ 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53
FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
4,434,115.50 4,495,391.09 9,000.00 4,494,465.00 12/04/2012/02/20AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53
39,535.70 38,474,839.98 38,745,454.04 0.40 38,747,050.45 38,745,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
457,531.17 455,000.00 1,668.33 455,000.00 02/14/1702/14/17AaaAAA 455,000.00 594918BW3 2.40
WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE)
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
3,069,720.00 2,976,855.68 20,758.33 2,913,840.00 06/21/1806/21/18Aa2AA 3,000,000.00 931142DU4 3.04
APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
3,502,120.86 3,373,549.01 33,448.00 3,348,574.20 05/06/1905/06/19Aa1AA+ 3,390,000.00 037833AK6 2.73
APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
1,450,579.68 1,442,539.70 4,200.00 1,444,737.60 05/11/2005/11/20Aa1AA+ 1,440,000.00 037833DV9 0.64
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
3,162,069.00 3,008,679.26 13,000.00 3,019,140.00 02/11/1902/11/19Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 037833CG3 2.86
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
662,399.10 659,729.32 178.75 659,670.00 03/18/2103/16/21A2A 660,000.00 808513BN4 0.77
Account 73340000 Page 9
Page 117
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
1,452,095.82 1,453,150.93 2,528.06 1,452,875.70 05/12/2105/10/21A1AA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5 0.50
UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024
440,683.76 440,000.00 374.90 440,000.00 08/12/2108/09/21A1A+ 440,000.00 904764BN6 0.63
BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
515,740.57 514,955.76 525.73 514,953.65 08/12/2108/09/21A2A 515,000.00 05565EBU8 0.75
US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
2,584,030.00 2,609,674.10 9,965.28 2,640,450.00 11/05/2010/30/20A1AA- 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1 0.69
NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
3,078,879.00 3,110,799.71 6,854.17 3,144,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20A1AA- 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3 0.63
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
606,943.90 610,000.00 429.29 610,000.00 02/16/2102/09/21A2A- 610,000.00 46647PBY1 0.56
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
1,701,550.40 1,697,503.78 3,866.67 1,714,864.00 03/09/2103/05/21A3A- 1,600,000.00 539830BE8 1.05
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
1,735,128.00 1,736,089.86 21,155.56 1,757,296.00 03/09/2103/05/21A2A- 1,600,000.00 369550BG2 1.09
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
1,659,659.29 1,684,137.89 2,211.56 1,684,005.85 02/01/2101/28/21A1A 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0 0.76
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
1,878,754.20 1,903,394.96 2,211.13 1,903,876.00 02/17/2102/12/21A2BBB+ 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8 0.81
IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
1,825,341.30 1,842,088.50 20,881.67 1,844,861.75 09/03/2109/01/21A2A- 1,675,000.00 459200JZ5 1.08
Account 73340000 Page 10
Page 118
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE)
CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
1,671,683.50 1,683,945.27 6,867.50 1,684,095.25 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 1,675,000.00 04636NAA1 1.08
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
1,099,283.84 1,102,572.29 3,556.72 1,102,546.90 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17
154,681.65 32,554,193.39 32,304,666.02 1.46 32,335,536.90 31,705,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
250,341.74 245,000.00 25.51 245,000.00 01/29/2001/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 949763S64 1.90
MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
250,152.60 245,000.00 782.32 245,000.00 01/30/2001/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 61760A6Q7 1.85
ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
244,797.14 245,000.00 21.14 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
243,842.62 245,000.00 6.71 245,000.00 07/29/2007/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 169894AT9 0.50
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
244,300.53 245,000.00 3.69 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55
839.37 1,233,434.63 1,225,000.00 1.06 1,225,000.00 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
180,039.69 179,985.95 20.00 179,981.80 01/27/2101/20/21AaaAAA 180,000.00 58770GAC4 0.25
HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
280,272.47 279,980.85 52.27 279,976.70 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 280,000.00 44891TAD8 0.42
GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
514,711.24 514,933.93 51.93 514,922.24 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 515,000.00 36261RAD0 0.33
Account 73340000 Page 11
Page 119
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
529,314.82 529,991.70 39.75 529,990.30 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 530,000.00 43813GAC5 0.27
HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
539,658.77 539,948.73 91.20 539,943.19 04/28/2104/20/21NRAAA 540,000.00 44933LAC7 0.38
GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
375,072.98 374,949.07 54.69 374,940.30 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 375,000.00 36261LAC5 0.35
KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
922,850.73 924,966.57 230.22 924,965.13 07/28/2107/20/21AaaNR 925,000.00 50117XAE2 0.56
CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
119,731.54 119,979.57 18.13 119,976.29 01/27/2101/20/21NRAAA 120,000.00 14316NAC3 0.34
CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
811,291.30 809,841.59 187.20 809,825.45 04/21/2104/13/21NRAAA 810,000.00 14314QAC8 0.52
CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
1,528,680.68 1,529,757.50 374.00 1,529,748.32 07/28/2107/21/21AaaAAA 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4 0.55
1,119.39 5,801,624.22 5,804,335.46 0.46 5,804,269.72 5,805,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
266,260,000.00 271,211,241.35 0.50 670,326.84 269,741,221.09 268,979,389.12 Managed Account Sub-Total
$266,260,000.00 $271,211,241.35 $670,326.84 $269,741,221.09 $268,979,389.12 0.50%
$269,649,715.96
$670,326.84
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account 73340000 Page 12
Page 120
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
1,779.79 2,285.16 4,501,406.25 100.03 WELLS_F 4,500,000.00 912828ZX1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
0.08 0.75
810.93 (54,458.16) 2,981,317.82 101.58 BONY 2,935,000.00 912828XQ8US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
0.11 0.83
2,259.04 (97,500.00) 8,105,000.00 101.31 CITIGRP 8,000,000.00 912828YK0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
0.11 1.03
2,203.60 (74,121.09) 5,847,031.25 101.69 CITIGRP 5,750,000.00 912828TY6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
0.12 1.11
2,117.85 (111,562.50) 8,583,750.00 102.19 CITIGRP 8,400,000.00 912828M80US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
0.12 1.15
1,513.61 (81,640.63) 5,123,437.50 102.47 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828N30US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
0.15 1.23
1,024.23 (44,156.37) 2,470,874.88 102.95 CITIGRP 2,400,000.00 9128283U2US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
0.16 1.32
443.33 (37,755.56) 1,872,501.47 103.45 CITIGRP 1,810,000.00 9128284A5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
0.18 1.40
(3,848.91)(68,906.25) 7,131,250.00 101.88 BNP_PAR 7,000,000.00 912828P79US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
0.17 1.41
(997.00)(16,210.94) 5,023,437.50 100.47 WELLS_F 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
0.18 1.46
(2,440.92)(129,101.81) 5,200,781.00 104.02 CITIGRP 5,000,000.00 9128284L1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
0.21 1.54
(3,009.74)(48,945.49) 3,581,484.20 102.33 NOMURA 3,500,000.00 912828R69US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
0.22 1.64
(9,454.55)(16,250.00) 6,502,031.25 100.03 WELLS_F 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
0.23 1.70
(4,004.85)(3,281.25) 5,986,875.00 99.78 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
0.24 1.83
(6,342.10)(3,515.88) 4,988,281.00 99.77 HSBC 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
0.25 1.87
(6,816.94)(3,320.56) 4,985,156.00 99.70 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
0.28 1.96
(40,939.00)(217,812.50) 8,382,500.00 104.78 RBS 8,000,000.00 9128286G0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
0.39 2.36
Account 73340000 Page 13
Page 121
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(17,534.13)(75,124.21) 3,761,859.38 104.06 MORGAN_ 3,615,000.00 912828X70US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
0.42 2.51
(20,339.34)(20,703.13) 4,985,937.50 99.72 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
0.48 2.78
(37,579.52)(121,373.43) 5,873,765.63 103.59 WELLS_F 5,670,000.00 912828Y87US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
0.47 2.77
(10,097.49)(10,000.00) 3,986,250.00 99.66 NOMURA 4,000,000.00 91282CCT6US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024
0.50 2.86
(16,895.56)(32,184.07) 2,293,758.71 102.17 BNP_PAR 2,245,000.00 912828YE4US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
0.50 2.87
(56,835.04)(172,031.55) 6,285,937.20 104.77 CITIGRP 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
0.52 2.92
(17,701.30)(43,359.38) 2,573,437.50 102.94 CITIGRP 2,500,000.00 912828YM6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
0.54 3.01
(42,122.53)(92,968.75) 5,146,875.00 102.94 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
0.56 3.09
(83,036.71)(234,375.00) 6,429,375.00 107.16 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
0.63 3.28
(30,119.42)(33,945.31) 2,735,390.63 99.47 MORGAN_ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
0.65 3.47
(67,714.42)(64,511.72) 4,414,218.75 98.09 BNP_PAR 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
0.76 3.82
(96,676.99)(89,687.50) 6,866,562.50 98.09 JPM_CHA 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
0.76 3.82
(20,525.79)(15,082.03) 3,822,000.00 98.00 HSBC 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
0.86 4.22
(24,075.32)(20,562.88) 4,056,271.30 97.86 CITIGRP 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.88 4.30
(43,847.46)(41,015.33) 5,871,562.80 97.86 RBS 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.88 4.30
(21,574.92)(18,529.30) 2,605,281.25 98.31 CITIGRP 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
0.89 4.37
3,163.42 5,742.19 2,979,375.00 99.31 NOMURA 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
0.91 4.43
Account 73340000 Page 14
Page 122
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(38,996.52)(38,125.00) 6,048,531.25 99.16 RBC 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
0.94 4.58
(18,298.54)(17,890.63) 1,968,125.00 98.41 CITIGRP 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
0.96 4.76
(40,101.65)(39,843.75) 2,952,187.50 98.41 CITIGRP 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
0.96 4.76
(2,181,824.61) 0.43 (766,610.86) 176,923,817.02 174,870,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.50
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
26,246.56 16,465.50 4,526,995.50 100.60 NEW ACC 4,500,000.00 459058FY4INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEV NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
0.14 0.32
(1.82) 809.68 1,742,197.53 99.84 TD 1,745,000.00 459058JV6INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
0.26 1.56
(509.91) 351.09 1,407,319.59 99.81 TD 1,410,000.00 459058JM6INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
0.34 2.14
(3,245.82)(3,225.54) 3,748,995.76 99.84 JPM_CHA 3,755,000.00 4581X0DZ8INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
0.55 2.96
(10,669.99)(22,108.50) 1,554,841.50 103.66 MORGAN_ 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
0.68 3.37
(7,707.77) 0.36 11,819.02 12,980,349.88 12,910,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.81
Municipal Bond / Note
2,920.35 1,490.00 503,790.00 100.76 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QR2SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
0.25 0.83
5,402.82 3,955.00 507,340.00 101.47 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QS0SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
0.46 1.82
5,445.00 0.36 8,323.17 1,011,130.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.33
Account 73340000 Page 15
Page 123
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Bond / Note
(334.34)(766.80) 4,260,426.00 100.01 MORGAN_ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
0.24 1.77
(5,108.07)(6,110.40) 4,796,817.60 99.93 KEYBANC 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
0.28 1.93
(1,570.78)(1,110.10) 1,697,359.90 99.84 CITIGRP 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
0.32 2.09
(3,423.87)(2,006.40) 4,392,977.60 99.84 NOMURA 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
0.32 2.15
(26,781.43)(28,440.48) 2,873,362.77 99.25 NEW ACC 2,895,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
0.70 3.68
(51,368.26)(55,170.00) 4,962,630.00 99.25 HSBC 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
0.70 3.68
(34,661.54)(36,381.00) 2,970,729.00 99.02 NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
0.76 3.72
(16,714.32)(16,475.00) 2,482,525.00 99.30 07/21/22NEW ACC 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
0.81 0.81
(20,517.63)(18,354.00) 1,970,146.00 98.51 NOMURA 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
0.76 3.88
(30,383.53)(28,975.40) 2,264,101.60 98.44 CITIGRP 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
0.77 3.95
(18,474.70)(18,071.39) 1,369,649.01 98.54 BMO 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
0.86 4.06
(61,275.59)(60,349.50) 4,434,115.50 98.54 JEFFERI 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
0.86 4.06
(272,210.47) 0.58 (270,614.06) 38,474,839.98 38,745,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.91
Corporate Note
2,531.17 2,531.17 457,531.17 100.56 01/06/22NEW ACC 455,000.00 594918BW3MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
0.80 0.27
92,864.32 155,880.00 3,069,720.00 102.32 11/15/22NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 931142DU4WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE)
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
0.42 1.11
Account 73340000 Page 16
Page 124
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
128,571.85 153,546.66 3,502,120.86 103.31 NEW ACC 3,390,000.00 037833AK6APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
0.32 1.56
8,039.98 5,842.08 1,450,579.68 100.73 NEW ACC 1,440,000.00 037833DV9APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
0.29 1.60
153,389.74 142,929.00 3,162,069.00 105.40 12/09/23NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 037833CG3APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
0.69 2.13
2,669.78 2,729.10 662,399.10 100.36 02/18/24CSFB 660,000.00 808513BN4CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
0.60 2.37
(1,055.11)(779.88) 1,452,095.82 99.80 JPM_CHA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
0.53 2.60
683.76 683.76 440,683.76 100.16 08/12/22DEUTSCH 440,000.00 904764BN6UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024
0.57 0.86
784.81 786.92 515,740.57 100.14 GOLDMAN 515,000.00 05565EBU8BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
0.70 2.84
(25,644.10)(56,420.00) 2,584,030.00 103.36 12/20/24US_BANC 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE)
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
1.01 3.12
(31,920.71)(65,871.00) 3,078,879.00 102.63 01/14/25US_BANC 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
0.96 3.20
(3,056.10)(3,056.10) 606,943.90 99.50 02/16/24JPM_CHA 610,000.00 46647PBY1JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
0.71 2.36
4,046.62 (13,313.60) 1,701,550.40 106.35 12/01/24MERRILL 1,600,000.00 539830BE8LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
1.01 3.05
(961.86)(22,168.00) 1,735,128.00 108.45 SUSQ 1,600,000.00 369550BG2GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
1.12 3.40
(24,478.60)(24,346.56) 1,659,659.29 98.50 12/28/25MITSU 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
1.11 4.18
Account 73340000 Page 17
Page 125
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(24,640.76)(25,121.80) 1,878,754.20 98.88 MERRILL 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
1.12 4.29
(16,747.20)(19,520.45) 1,825,341.30 108.98 MORGAN_ 1,675,000.00 459200JZ5IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
1.29 4.29
(12,261.77)(12,411.75) 1,671,683.50 99.80 04/28/26MORGAN_ 1,675,000.00 04636NAA1ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE)
CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
1.24 4.53
(3,288.45)(3,263.06) 1,099,283.84 99.48 JPM_CHA 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
1.24 4.59
218,656.49 0.82 249,527.37 32,554,193.39 31,705,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.80
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
5,341.74 5,341.74 250,341.74 102.18 NEW ACC 245,000.00 949763S64WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
0.26 1.32
5,152.60 5,152.60 250,152.60 102.10 NEW ACC 245,000.00 61760A6Q7MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
0.27 1.32
(202.86)(202.86) 244,797.14 99.92 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
0.48 2.80
(1,157.38)(1,157.38) 243,842.62 99.53 NEW ACC 245,000.00 169894AT9CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
0.62 3.80
(699.47)(699.47) 244,300.53 99.71 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
0.63 3.79
8,434.63 0.45 8,434.63 1,233,434.63 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.59
Asset-Backed Security
53.74 57.89 180,039.69 100.02 MITSU 180,000.00 58770GAC4MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
0.24 1.21
291.62 295.77 280,272.47 100.10 SOCGEN 280,000.00 44891TAD8HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
0.39 1.68
Account 73340000 Page 18
Page 126
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
(222.69)(211.00) 514,711.24 99.94 RBC 515,000.00 36261RAD0GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
0.35 1.65
(676.88)(675.48) 529,314.82 99.87 JPM_CHA 530,000.00 43813GAC5HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
0.31 1.35
(289.96)(284.42) 539,658.77 99.94 BARCLAY 540,000.00 44933LAC7HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
0.40 1.86
123.91 132.68 375,072.98 100.02 DEUTSCH 375,000.00 36261LAC5GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
0.35 1.35
(2,115.84)(2,114.40) 922,850.73 99.77 MITSU 925,000.00 50117XAE2KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
0.62 2.63
(248.03)(244.75) 119,731.54 99.78 MITSU 120,000.00 14316NAC3CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
0.39 1.38
1,449.71 1,465.85 811,291.30 100.16 MERRILL 810,000.00 14314QAC8CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
0.48 2.08
(1,076.82)(1,067.64) 1,528,680.68 99.91 RBC 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
0.57 2.43
(2,645.50) 0.47 (2,711.24) 5,801,624.22 5,805,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.03
266,260,000.00 268,979,389.12 (2,231,852.23)(761,831.97) 0.50 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.55
Total Investments $269,649,715.96
$670,326.84
$268,979,389.12
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $266,260,000.00 ($2,231,852.23)($761,831.97) 0.50% 2.55
Account 73340000 Page 19
Page 127
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
09/03/21 IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
459200JZ5 (1,844,861.75)(16,582.50)(1,861,444.25) 1,675,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC
(CALLABLE) CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
04636NAA1 (1,684,095.25)(5,304.17)(1,689,399.42) 1,675,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024
91282CCT6 (3,996,250.00)(774.46)(3,997,024.46) 4,000,000.00 09/01/21
09/13/21 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
89236TJK2 (1,102,546.90)(2,935.16)(1,105,482.06) 1,105,000.00 09/08/21
09/23/21 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 (3,752,221.30) 0.00 (3,752,221.30) 3,755,000.00 09/15/21
(25,596.29)(12,405,571.49)(12,379,975.20) 12,210,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
09/01/21 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 33.81 33.81 0.00 09/01/21
09/01/21 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
539830BE8 0.00 23,200.00 23,200.00 1,600,000.00 09/01/21
09/08/21 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
3137EAEW5 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 4,800,000.00 09/08/21
09/14/21 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
4581X0DK1 0.00 13,125.00 13,125.00 1,500,000.00 09/14/21
09/15/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
91282CAK7 0.00 3,125.00 3,125.00 5,000,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 KCOT 2021-2A A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025
50117XAE2 0.00 431.67 431.67 925,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
58770GAC4 0.00 37.50 37.50 180,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 CARMX 2021-3 A3
DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026
14317DAC4 0.00 701.25 701.25 1,530,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 0.00 171.00 171.00 540,000.00 09/15/21
Account 73340000 Page 20
Page 128
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
09/15/21 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 0.00 34.00 34.00 120,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 0.00 351.00 351.00 810,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
44891TAD8 0.00 98.00 98.00 280,000.00 09/15/21
09/15/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
912828ZD5 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 5,000,000.00 09/15/21
09/16/21 GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
36261LAC5 0.00 109.38 109.38 375,000.00 09/16/21
09/18/21 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
808513BN4 0.00 2,475.00 2,475.00 660,000.00 09/18/21
09/20/21 GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
36261RAD0 0.00 141.63 141.63 515,000.00 09/20/21
09/21/21 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 0.00 119.25 119.25 530,000.00 09/21/21
09/23/21 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 0.00 4,312.50 4,312.50 2,300,000.00 09/23/21
09/24/21 ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
29278TQD5 0.00 93.64 93.64 245,000.00 09/24/21
09/29/21 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
949763S64 0.00 395.36 395.36 245,000.00 09/29/21
09/29/21 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
169894AT9 0.00 104.04 104.04 245,000.00 09/29/21
09/30/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
9128282Y5 0.00 63,750.00 63,750.00 6,000,000.00 09/30/21
09/30/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
91282CBT7 0.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 3,000,000.00 09/30/21
09/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 114.45 114.45 245,000.00 09/30/21
09/30/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
912828ZF0 0.00 6,875.00 6,875.00 2,750,000.00 09/30/21
149,548.48 149,548.48 0.00 39,395,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
Account 73340000 Page 21
Page 129
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
SELL
09/03/21 FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
3135G0X24 3,481,554.50 8,468.06 3,490,022.56 (48,240.00)(9,104.19)FIFO 3,350,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
912828ZX1 3,501,640.63 772.76 3,502,413.39 2,324.22 1,961.06 FIFO 3,500,000.00 09/01/21
09/13/21 FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 1,100,248.50 1,319.86 1,101,568.36 (7,348.25)(6,741.09)FIFO 1,105,000.00 09/08/21
09/20/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
912828YE4 3,845,794.73 2,593.23 3,848,387.96 (44,590.62)(20,153.20)FIFO 3,755,000.00 09/15/21
13,153.91 (34,037.42)(97,854.65) 11,942,392.27 11,929,238.36 11,710,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(450,736.84) 137,106.10 (313,630.74)(97,854.65)(34,037.42)Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions ($97,854.65)($313,630.74)$137,106.10 ($450,736.84)($34,037.42)
Account 73340000 Page 22
Page 130
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue/Description Paying Agent Account Name Trust Account #Fund Investment Date Date*Yield Value
CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 1 (2013) Wells Fargo Reserve Fund 46571801 865 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 1,417,005.18$
Agency Project 46571807 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 77,812.06$
Cultural Center Fund 46571808 615 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 191,844.90$
Bond Fund 46571800 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 4.51$
Developer Project 46571806 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 98,092.95$
Special Tax 46571805 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 77.15$
1,784,836.75$
CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 2 (2013) Wells Fargo Bond Fund 46659800 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 0.85$
Reserve Fund 46659801 867 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 132,474.19$
Special Tax Fund 46659805 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01% 7.23$
132,482.27$
CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Series Wells Fargo Admin Expense Fund 48436802 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% -$
Bond Fund 48436800 820 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% 9.88
Reserve Fund 48436801 821 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01% 1,187,370.26
Special Tax Fund 48436807 820 Money Market Fund N/A 64.73
Project Fund 48436809 617 Money Market Fund N/A 44,981.11
1,232,425.98$
2014 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund 48709906 Money Market Fund N/A -$
Bond Fund 48709900 858 Money Market Fund N/A 3.25
Reserve Fund 48709901 859 Money Market Fund N/A 260,754.43
Sepcial Tax Fund 48709907 858 Money Market Fund N/A 14.19
Rebate Fund 48709908 Money Market Fund N/A -
Redemption Fund 48709903 Money Market Fund N/A -
Prepayment Fund 48709904 Money Market Fund N/A -
260,771.87$
2019 Lease Revenue Bonds Wells Fargo Bond Fund 82631600 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 0.56$
Interest 82631601 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 0.98
Principal 82631602 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 1.71
Acquisition and Construciton - Series A 82631605 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 7,632,927.11
Acquisition and Construciton - Series B 82631606 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 2,294,245.68
Cost of Issuance 82631607 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A -
9,927,176.04$
CFD No. 2000-01 South Etiwanda Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-1 AGY 6712140200 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140201 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 10,652.41
Bond Fund 6712140202 852 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.10
Prepayment Fund 6712140203 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -
Reserve Fund 6712140204 853 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 12,100.09
22,752.60$
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended
9/30/2021
I:\FINANCE\KATHERINE\Fiscal Agent Stmts\FY 2021-22\09-2021\September 2021_Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook
Summary Report Page 1 of 2Page131
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue/Description Paying Agent Account Name Trust Account #Fund Investment Date Date*Yield Value
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended
9/30/2021
CFD No. 2000-02 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-2 AGY 6712140300 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140301 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 91,569.95$
Bond Fund 6712140302 856 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.96$
Prepayment Fund 6712140303 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Reserve Fund 6712140304 857 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 117,350.83
208,921.74$
CFD No. 2001-01 IA 1&2, Series A Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140400 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140401 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 186,190.00
Bond Fund 6712140402 860 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 1.06
Prepayment Fund 6712140403 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -
Reserve Fund 6712140404 861 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 117,351.16
303,542.22$
CFD No. 2001-01 IA3, Series B Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140500 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140501 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 3,223.09
Bond Fund 6712140502 862 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.10
Prepayment Fund 6712140503 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -
Reserve Fund 6712140504 863 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 26,250.12
29,473.31$
CFD No. 2006-01 Vintner's Grove Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-1 AGY 6712140600 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140601 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 304.45
Bond Fund 6712140602 869 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.41
Prepayment Fund 6712140603 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -
Reserve Fund 6712140604 870 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 130,467.37
130,772.23$
CFD No. 2006-02 Amador on Rt. 66 Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-2 AGY 6712140700 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$
Special Tax Fund 6712140701 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 1,190.56
Bond Fund 6712140702 871 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.25
Prepayment Fund 6712140703 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -
Reserve Fund 6712140704 872 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 78,281.94
79,472.75$
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS 14,112,627.76$
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
I:\FINANCE\KATHERINE\Fiscal Agent Stmts\FY 2021-22\09-2021\September 2021_Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook
Summary Report Page 2 of 2Page132
Page 133
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
1,893,221.71 3.02 Corporate Note
489,097.67 0.78 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
1,589,221.70 2.53 Commercial Paper
2,760,323.22 4.40 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
18,113,020.19 28.85 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
37,574,874.41 59.83 Local Agency Investment Fund
367,572.10 0.59 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$62,787,331.00 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFM Managed Account 148.79 24,844,884.49
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 37,574,874.41
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 367,572.10
$148.79 $62,787,331.00 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
37,942,446.51
0.00
0.00
1,589,221.70
0.00
6,621,781.29
5,505,853.26
4,600,165.28
6,527,862.96
0.00
60.42
0.00
0.00
2.53
0.00
10.55
8.77
7.33
10.40
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $62,787,331.00
404
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
3.02%
Corporate Note
0.78%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
2.53%
Commercial Paper
4.40%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
28.85%
US TSY Bond / Note
59.83%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
0.59%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1
Page 134
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$24,921,202.24
0.00
(2,062,544.80)
2,077,117.56
0.00
(90,890.51)
$24,844,884.49
1,711.04
(2,433.66)
871.41
$148.79
Total
24,941,648.34
88,748.26
2,064,047.44
0.00
208.40
(2,079,551.22)
(24,940,617.71)
(65,494.82)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $8,988.69
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
0.00
2,064,047.44
208.40
0.00
(2,079,551.22)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$39,319.00 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340100 Page 1
Page 135
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 17,835,000.00 18,113,020.19 72.90
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 2,810,000.00 2,760,323.22 11.11
Corporate Note 1,790,000.00 1,893,221.71 7.62
Commercial Paper 1,590,000.00 1,589,221.70 6.40
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 490,000.00 489,097.67 1.97
Managed Account Sub-Total 24,515,000.00 24,844,884.49 100.00%
Accrued Interest 88,748.26
Total Portfolio 24,515,000.00 24,933,632.75
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
1.97%
Cert of Deposit -
FDIC
6.40%
Commercial Paper
7.62%
Corporate Note
11.11%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
72.90%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
6.40%
0.00%
26.65%
22.16%
18.52%
26.27%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1019
0.44%
0.56%
Account 73340100 Page 2
Page 136
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
0.44%
A+
3.47%
A-
6.40%
A-1
1.51%
AA
72.89%
AA+
11.11%
AAA
2.21%
BBB+
1.97%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
374,564.25 1.51 AMAZON.COM INC
149,703.00 0.60 ASTRAZENECA PLC
180,026.88 0.72 BANK OF AMERICA CO
185,102.29 0.75 CITIGROUP INC
244,797.14 0.99 ENERBANK USA
180,811.13 0.73 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
163,463.40 0.66 IBM CORP
364,416.37 1.47 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
2,395,906.85 9.64 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
367,793.30 1.48 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
794,577.06 3.20 LMA AMERICAS LLC
244,300.53 0.98 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
794,644.64 3.20 MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC
182,326.49 0.73 MORGAN STANLEY
109,430.97 0.44 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP
18,113,020.19 72.90 UNITED STATES TREASURY
$24,844,884.49 Total 100.00%
Account 73340100 Page 3
Page 137
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022
2,439,618.87 2,440,366.25 1,025.00 2,440,476.56 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,440,000.00 91282CAX9 0.11
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023
2,391,461.60 2,393,764.28 21,209.94 2,414,591.02 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,295,000.00 9128284S6 0.16
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
997,812.50 998,479.98 210.60 998,359.38 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/31/2021 0.125% 08/31/2023
792,888.32 793,745.93 85.10 793,695.70 09/03/2109/02/21AaaAA+ 795,000.00 91282CCU3 0.21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023
2,384,300.00 2,389,380.12 21,835.86 2,410,342.97 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,260,000.00 9128285P1 0.22
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
1,965,433.50 1,971,665.70 1,864.98 1,971,219.73 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 1,975,000.00 91282CCC3 0.31
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
546,906.25 548,467.98 405.74 548,367.19 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 550,000.00 91282CCG4 0.35
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
2,413,884.38 2,422,934.10 11,821.11 2,431,563.48 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,345,000.00 912828YV6 0.44
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
1,941,980.37 1,952,115.97 1,659.32 1,949,926.76 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 1,975,000.00 912828ZT0 0.57
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
489,296.90 493,033.39 315.90 492,910.16 09/03/2109/01/21AaaAA+ 500,000.00 91282CBH3 0.70
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
694,750.00 698,754.75 2,197.01 698,660.16 05/27/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 700,000.00 91282CBW0 0.79
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026
1,054,687.50 1,065,357.02 7,141.39 1,067,851.56 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 9128286X3 0.70
69,771.95 18,113,020.19 18,168,065.47 0.34 18,217,964.67 17,835,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
364,416.37 364,731.87 40.56 364,729.90 09/23/2109/15/21AaaAAA 365,000.00 4581X0DZ8 0.52
Account 73340100 Page 4
Page 138
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026
2,395,906.85 2,424,609.00 2,251.44 2,422,970.55 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAAA 2,445,000.00 459058JS3 0.85
2,292.00 2,760,323.22 2,789,340.87 0.80 2,787,700.45 2,810,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026
182,326.49 183,542.88 1,136.67 185,034.30 05/27/2105/25/21A1BBB+ 165,000.00 61746BDZ6 1.19
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES
(CALL
DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026
180,811.13 182,135.28 618.75 183,570.75 05/27/2105/25/21A2BBB+ 165,000.00 38143U8H7 1.30
JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026
367,793.30 371,046.32 5,610.00 373,585.20 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 340,000.00 46625HQW3 1.20
BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026
180,026.88 181,630.90 2,598.75 182,902.50 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 165,000.00 06051GFX2 1.21
CITIGROUP CORP NOTES
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
185,102.29 185,906.42 2,408.33 187,113.90 05/27/2105/25/21A3BBB+ 170,000.00 172967KN0 1.29
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026
374,564.25 375,331.27 1,447.92 375,356.25 05/27/2105/25/21A1AA 375,000.00 023135BX3 0.98
IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
163,463.40 164,963.15 1,870.00 165,211.50 09/03/2109/01/21A2A- 150,000.00 459200JZ5 1.08
ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE)
CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
149,703.00 150,801.07 615.00 150,814.50 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 150,000.00 04636NAA1 1.08
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
109,430.97 109,758.33 354.06 109,755.80 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 110,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17
16,659.48 1,893,221.71 1,905,115.62 1.15 1,913,344.70 1,790,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Account 73340100 Page 5
Page 139
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Commercial Paper
LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022
794,577.06 794,590.13 0.00 794,137.87 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 53944RAR9 0.16
MUFG BANK LTD/NY COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 02/18/2022
794,644.64 794,536.25 0.00 794,112.25 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 62479MBJ1 0.15
0.00 1,589,221.70 1,589,126.38 0.16 1,588,250.12 1,590,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
244,797.14 245,000.00 21.14 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
244,300.53 245,000.00 3.69 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55
24.83 489,097.67 490,000.00 0.50 490,000.00 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
24,515,000.00 24,997,259.94 0.44 88,748.26 24,941,648.34 24,844,884.49 Managed Account Sub-Total
$24,515,000.00 $24,997,259.94 $88,748.26 $24,941,648.34 $24,844,884.49 0.44%
$24,933,632.75
$88,748.26
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account 73340100 Page 6
Page 140
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(747.38)(857.69) 2,439,618.87 99.98 HSBC 2,440,000.00 91282CAX9US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022
0.14 1.17
(2,302.68)(23,129.42) 2,391,461.60 104.20 HSBC 2,295,000.00 9128284S6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023
0.22 1.63
(667.48)(546.88) 997,812.50 99.78 MERRILL 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023
0.24 1.83
(857.61)(807.38) 792,888.32 99.73 CITIGRP 795,000.00 91282CCU3US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/31/2021 0.125% 08/31/2023
0.26 1.92
(5,080.12)(26,042.97) 2,384,300.00 105.50 CITIGRP 2,260,000.00 9128285P1US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023
0.33 2.10
(6,232.20)(5,786.23) 1,965,433.50 99.52 BARCLAY 1,975,000.00 91282CCC3US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
0.44 2.62
(1,561.73)(1,460.94) 546,906.25 99.44 MERRILL 550,000.00 91282CCG4US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
0.46 2.70
(9,049.72)(17,679.10) 2,413,884.38 102.94 GOLDMAN 2,345,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
0.56 3.09
(10,135.60)(7,946.39) 1,941,980.37 98.33 WELLS_F 1,975,000.00 912828ZT0US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
0.71 3.65
(3,736.49)(3,613.26) 489,296.90 97.86 NOMURA 500,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.88 4.30
(4,004.75)(3,910.16) 694,750.00 99.25 BNP_PAR 700,000.00 91282CBW0US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
0.92 4.50
(10,669.52)(13,164.06) 1,054,687.50 105.47 CITIGRP 1,000,000.00 9128286X3US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026
0.92 4.44
(104,944.48) 0.44 (55,045.28) 18,113,020.19 17,835,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.55
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
(315.50)(313.53) 364,416.37 99.84 JPM_CHA 365,000.00 4581X0DZ8INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
0.55 2.96
(28,702.15)(27,063.70) 2,395,906.85 97.99 11/10/21KEYBANC 2,445,000.00 459058JS3INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026
1.12 0.12
(27,377.23) 1.04 (29,017.65) 2,760,323.22 2,810,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.49
Account 73340100 Page 7
Page 141
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(1,216.39)(2,707.81) 182,326.49 110.50 BNP_PAR 165,000.00 61746BDZ6MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026
1.37 4.02
(1,324.15)(2,759.62) 180,811.13 109.58 11/25/25JPM_CHA 165,000.00 38143U8H7GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES
(CALL
DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026
1.49 3.89
(3,253.02)(5,791.90) 367,793.30 108.17 01/01/26JSEB 340,000.00 46625HQW3JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026
1.42 3.95
(1,604.02)(2,875.62) 180,026.88 109.11 FIFTH_3 165,000.00 06051GFX2BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026
1.43 4.20
(804.13)(2,011.61) 185,102.29 108.88 JPM_CHA 170,000.00 172967KN0CITIGROUP CORP NOTES
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
1.39 4.25
(767.02)(792.00) 374,564.25 99.88 UBS 375,000.00 023135BX3AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026
1.03 4.51
(1,499.75)(1,748.10) 163,463.40 108.98 MORGAN_ 150,000.00 459200JZ5IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
1.29 4.29
(1,098.07)(1,111.50) 149,703.00 99.80 04/28/26MORGAN_ 150,000.00 04636NAA1ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE)
CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
1.24 4.53
(327.36)(324.83) 109,430.97 99.48 JPM_CHA 110,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
1.24 4.59
(20,122.99) 1.31 (11,893.91) 1,893,221.71 1,790,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 4.23
Commercial Paper
(13.07) 439.19 794,577.06 99.95 JPM_CHA 795,000.00 53944RAR9LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022
0.16 0.33
108.39 532.39 794,644.64 99.96 MITSU 795,000.00 62479MBJ1MUFG BANK LTD/NY COMM PAPER
DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 02/18/2022
0.11 0.39
971.58 0.13 95.32 1,589,221.70 1,590,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.36
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
Account 73340100 Page 8
Page 142
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
(202.86)(202.86) 244,797.14 99.92 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
0.48 2.80
(699.47)(699.47) 244,300.53 99.71 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
0.63 3.79
(902.33) 0.55 (902.33) 489,097.67 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.30
24,515,000.00 24,844,884.49 (152,375.45)(96,763.85) 0.56 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.32
Total Investments $24,933,632.75
$88,748.26
$24,844,884.49
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $24,515,000.00 ($152,375.45)($96,763.85) 0.56% 2.32
Account 73340100 Page 9
Page 143
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
09/03/21 ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC
(CALLABLE) CORP
DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026
04636NAA1 (150,814.50)(475.00)(151,289.50) 150,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 IBM CORP
DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026
459200JZ5 (165,211.50)(1,485.00)(166,696.50) 150,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 (492,910.16)(173.23)(493,083.39) 500,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/31/2021 0.125% 08/31/2023
91282CCU3 (793,695.70)(8.24)(793,703.94) 795,000.00 09/02/21
09/13/21 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
89236TJK2 (109,755.80)(292.19)(110,047.99) 110,000.00 09/08/21
09/23/21 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 (364,729.90) 0.00 (364,729.90) 365,000.00 09/15/21
(2,433.66)(2,079,551.22)(2,077,117.56) 2,070,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
09/01/21 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 09/01/21
09/24/21 ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
29278TQD5 0.00 93.64 93.64 245,000.00 09/24/21
09/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 114.45 114.45 245,000.00 09/30/21
208.40 208.40 0.00 490,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
09/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
912828ZT0 493,984.38 324.45 494,308.83 332.04 (100.95)FIFO 500,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
91282CBW0 300,222.66 770.38 300,993.04 796.88 765.28 FIFO 300,000.00 09/01/21
09/03/21 COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA COMM
PAPER
DTD 04/28/2021 0.000% 11/29/2021
21687AYV9 794,807.88 0.00 794,807.88 303.43 38.43 FIFO 795,000.00 09/02/21
Account 73340100 Page 10
Page 144
For the Month Ending September 30, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
SELL
09/13/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
91282CCC3 109,656.25 90.42 109,746.67 (133.20)(154.55)FIFO 110,000.00 09/08/21
09/20/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024
91282CCC3 363,873.63 317.39 364,191.02 (427.74)(503.08)FIFO 365,000.00 09/15/21
1,502.64 45.13 871.41 2,064,047.44 2,062,544.80 2,070,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(14,572.76)(722.62)(15,295.38) 871.41 45.13 Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions $871.41 ($15,295.38)($722.62)($14,572.76)$45.13
Account 73340100 Page 11
Page 145
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief
Rob Ball, Fire Marshal
Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of Finance
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $82,383
Awarded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the FY
2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant; and Authorization to Appropriate
$86,510 for Approved Grant Expenses and Required Local Match.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council / Fire Board:
1. Accept grant revenue in the amount of $82,383.33 awarded by Federal Emergency
Management Agency under the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant Program; and
2. Authorize the appropriation of $82,390 for the purchase of smoke detectors and other
grant approved expenses.
3. Authorize the appropriation of $4,120 for the required local match.
BACKGROUND:
In January 2021, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) opened up the application
period for the FY 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Grant Program. FP&S grants support
projects that enhance the safety of the public and firefighters from fire and related hazards.
Staff reviewed the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) which identified smoke alarm
installation programs as one of the grant funding priorities. Having worked with the American Red
Cross in 2019 on two “Sound the Alarm” smoke alarm installation events at mobile home parks in
the city, staff felt that a large scale smoke alarm installation project could be planned, coordinated,
and executed effectively. Staff also felt that there was sufficient interest among volunteer and
charitable organizations to adequately staff such events. As such, the decision was made to
apply for grant funds.
Staff saw the potential grant funds as a means of improving the quality of life and household
safety of those who live in homes constructed prior to the current Building and Fire Codes that
require a smoke alarm in all sleeping rooms. The grant’s NOFO encouraged fire agencies to
propose projects that would benefit disadvantaged members of the community. Socioeconomic
research by the US Fire Administration shows that low- and fixed-income households are
Page 146
Page 2
9
7
9
disproportionately affected by home fires. Research on households in the US shows that those
that are by definition low- or fixed-income are more likely to live in a community’s older housing
stock.
With the data available from the City’s Community and Economic Development division and the
US Census Bureau, and assistance from the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT), it
was determined that the residents of mobile home parks and the southwest Cucamonga area of
the city would benefit most from a smoke alarm installation program.
As reported to FEMA in the grant application, the Cucamonga area of the city has some of the
oldest housing stock in the region. A little more than 1/3 of the housing was built prior to 1986 and
prior to the code requirements to have smoke alarms in every sleeping room. Of the 11 census
blocks in the Cucamonga area of the city, three have an average annual household income that
is below 150% of the Federal Poverty Level for a household of four and two other census blocks
have an average annual household income that is less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level.
There are approximately 800 single-detached homes in this area that were built prior to codes
requiring smoke alarms in every sleeping room. In addition to these homes, staff identified 855
mobile homes coaches that are less likely to have a smoke alarm in every sleeping room.
Within weeks of the September 2019 “Sound the Alarm” event with the American Red Cross there
was a fire in a mobile home. The resident was at home at the time of the fire. A smoke alarm
installed during the “Sound the Alarm” event activated and alerted the resident that there was a
fire. The early notification allowed the resident to escape the fast moving fire. With the success of
the “Sound the Alarm” event, the decision was made to submit an application for grant funding for
a large-scale smoke alarm installation program.
For maximum reach and effectiveness, Fire District staff will be working closely with Healthy RC,
the Family Resource Center, faith-based organizations, and other community organizations who
have relationships with the neighborhoods and households that can benefit from this program.
ANALYSIS:
With past experience showing that mobile home coaches and older housing stock need an
average of three smoke alarms installed to meet current fire and life safety codes, staff reported
to FEMA that the project would need approximately 5,000 smoke alarms to install three alarms in
the 1,655 homes that were identified as being the preferred recipients of the benefits of the grant.
In addition to installing smoke alarms, staff reported to FEMA that the opportunity to install smoke
alarms would also be used to provide the households with fire and injury prevention information
as was done during the Sound the Alarm events. As this would require a significant amount of
printed material and enhancements to City and Fire District web pages, the grant application
requested $4,250.00 for these materials. To facilitate the installation of the smoke alarms, the
grant application also requested $2,250.00 for miscellaneous tools, materials, and equipment for
use by City, Fire District, and volunteer personnel.
The smoke alarms that will be installed will meet all current state codes. They will be sealed
battery, maintenance-free alarms that have a life span of 10 years. Residents receiving a smoke
alarm will not have to replace the batteries at regular intervals. These alarms provide long-term
protection without additional costs for replacement batteries. In addition to eliminating the cost of
maintenance, these alarms also eliminate the need to use stools or ladders to access the alarms
to replace batteries. This will eliminate a potential source of fall injuries that could significantly
affect quality of life, especially for senior aged residents.
Page 147
Page 3
9
7
9
FISCAL IMPACT:
Grant funding has been approved in the amount of $82,383.33 in Federal funding. As a condition
of this grant, the Fire District is required to contribute non-Federal funds equal to or greater than
5% of the Federal funds awarded, or $4,119.17 for a total approved budget of $86,502.50.
Staff requests that the Fire Board accept the grant and approve the following appropriation
necessary to receive the grant funds and budget the related expenses:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
1275000-4750 /
2087-0
Federal Grants Fund Grant Income - Federal $82,390.00
3281000-8275 Fire Fund Transfer In- Federal Grants
Fund
$82,390.00
TOTAL REVENUE:$164,780.00
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
1275208-9281 /
2087275-0
Federal Grant Fund Transfer Out – Fire Fund $82,390.00
3281506-5291 /
2087-4215
Fire Fund – Fire
Prevention
Equipment Supplies &
Repairs
$86,510.00
TOTAL EXPENSE:$168,900.00
The District will be reimbursed from grant funds when invoices for the eligible expenses are
submitted to the grant administrator.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the City Council / Fire Board’s vision and core values by
providing a sustainable City, as well as promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community
for all. This item also incorporates working together cooperatively and respectfully with City
departments, residents, and community-based organizations.
ATTACHMENTS:
n/a
Page 148
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief
Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services
for the Fire Station 178 Project in the Amount of $33,640 and
Authorization to Appropriate $33,640. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board:
1. Approve amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement, FD 19-021, with
Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project
in the amount of $33,640; and
2. Authorize the appropriation of $33,640 to the Fire Capital Fund (Fund 288).
BACKGROUND:
On February 17, 2016, at the direction of the Fire Board, the District purchased 3.8 acres of
property located on the south side of Town Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue for a public use,
namely for fire safety and protection services for building a future Fire Station 178. Much strategic
analysis went into the selection of this land as the most viable location for the future fire station.
The location will help maximize existing resources to better serve the central community. This
new station will be based on modern construction standards and is intended to meet the District's
mission for at least 50 years.
On November 20, 2019, the Fire District and Mary McGrath Architects entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), CO #FD19-021, for consulting services that included Project Initiation
and Program Development. This initial phase identified goals and objectives, data collection, and
the scope and scale of the project with the Design Team.
On August 5, 2020, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 001 with Mary McGrath
Architects for $372,875 (including a 10% contingency) for Conceptual Design Build services of
the new Fire Station 178, in accordance with the price proposal submitted in RFP# 20/21001.
On July 7, 2021, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 002 for $44,540 for design of
a joint City/Fire records storage building and a solar/battery storage system for the fire station.
ANALYSIS:
Page 149
Page 2
9
8
3
The conceptual design build phase for the new Fire Station 178 has been a Team RC project with
input from the City Manager's Office, Planning, Engineering, and the Fire District. Mary McGrath
Architects has assisted the Design Team in architectural schematic design, landscape, cost
estimate, bridging documents (detailed project specifications, structural performance
requirements, grading and drainage conceptual design, sustainable goals, etc.), construction and
design documents.
On September 1, 2021, the Fire Board considered options for construction of a 9/11 Memorial
using steel remnants obtained from the South Tower of the World Trade Center. During the study
session, the Fire Board directed staff to move forward with incorporating the 9/11 Memorial at the
Fire Station 178 site. Mary McGrath Architects has provided a proposal for design of this
memorial. The scope of work includes design and layout of the memorial, as well as creation of
the Basis of Design documents and coordination with the Design-Build contractor’s team.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of the amendment is $33,640. An appropriation of $33,640 in the Fire District’s
Capital Fund (3288501-5650 / 1645288-6311) is needed for the amendment.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The construction of the Fire Station 178 will promote a safe and healthy community for all by
enhancing the delivery of vital life safety services and ensuring efficient response times to
residents, visitors, and businesses. The inclusion of the 9/11 Memorial will continue to build and
preserve a family-oriented atmosphere by providing the community a space for reflection and
remembrance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Scope of Work
Page 150
October 4, 2021
Darci Vogel
Business Manager
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Via E‐mail: Darci.Vogel@cityofrc.us
RE: Additional Service Request for War memorial Park Concept Design
Dear Ms. Vogel,
It is our pleasure to submit our proposal for the creation of a concept design for the War Memorial Park.
We are excited to see the project moving forward and look forward to the opportunity to creating such
an important monument for the City. The documents will be prepared at a concept level of design and
will include written performance requirements. These documents will allow the Design‐Build
contractor’s team to provide a high‐level order of magnitude cost proposal for the park addition and
ultimately, the DB Team will complete the construction documents for the memorial and construct it.
The fee proposal includes a conceptual layout with associated structural, lighting and landscape
architectural elements. The total fee for this scope of work is $33,640.
We look forward to the opportunity to continue our good working relationship with the City and Fire
District. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding this proposal.
Sincerely,
Mary McGrath, AIA, LEED® AP,
President
Mary McGrath Architects
510.208.9400
mmcgrath@marymcgratharchitects.com
Page 151
2
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1: War Memorial Park Design
Approach:
The design team will work with the City advisory members in the development of a park design
that creates a walking and resting experience. The elements to be included in the memorial
include the following:
- 9/11/2001 Monuments
o WTC Steel (three pieces)
o Pentagon
o Flight 93
o Names of all lives lost
- Wars:
o Gulf War (1991)
Names of service members from Rancho Cucamonga who lost their life.
o War In Afghanistan (2001 – 2021)
Names of service members from Rancho Cucamonga who lost their life.
o Iraq War (2003 – 2011)
Names of service members from Rancho Cucamonga who lost their life.
The goal is for the elements to be simple and reverent. The park should include trees, benches,
lighting and be secured with fencing and gates that can be closed if need arises. The walking
path may be a DG surface.
We will prepare this work in two steps. The first is a general layout and the design of the
vertical Twin Tower metal piece with a name plate. Based on comments from this initial design,
the team will make revisions and expand on the other monument designs.
Task 2: Basis of Design Documents and DBE Coordination
Approach:
Once we have an approved design, we will issue the Basis of Design to the DBE for pricing and
participate in a Teams meeting with the DBE to present the design approach and respond to
questions.
Page 152
Rancho Cucamonga Design Build
War Memorial Park
Basis of Design Bridging Documents
October 4, 2021
Task 1
Develop Design Concepts
for Park
Mary McGrath
Architects
Principal in
Charge
Project
Manager
Project
Architect SR.
Designer
Architect
Designer
Intermediate
Designer
Technical
Editor Totals
rate $195 $185 $165 $145 $125 $75
hours 12 0 0 60 0 0
total amount $2,340 $0 $0 $8,700 $0 $0 $11,040
Consultant Struct. Mech/Plmb Elec/Data Civil Cost Landscape Totals
Fee $3,500 $0 $1,500 $4,600 $0 $6,000
10% Mark‐up $350 $0 $150 $460 $0 $600
total amount $3,850 $0 $1,650 $5,060 $0 $6,600 $17,160
Task 1 $28,200
Task 2
Meeting with DBE to
review Design
Mary McGrath
Architects
Principal in
Charge
Project
Manager
Project
Architect SR.
Designer
Architect
Designer
Intermediate
Designer
Technical
Editor Totals
rate $195 $185 $165 $145 $125 $75
hours 16 0 0 16 0 0
total amount $3,120 $0 $0 $2,320 $0 $0 $5,440
Consultant Struct. Mech/Plmb Elec/Data UL Cost Landscape Totals
Fee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10% Mark‐up $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
total amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Allowance Task 2 $5,440
Total Fee:
Task 1 Develop Design Concepts for Park $28,200
Task 2 Meeting with DBE to review Design $5,440
$33,640
Page 153
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief
Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief
Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services
Agreement with 360 Deep Cleaning Services, LLC for Janitorial Services
as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of $200,000 and Authorization
to Appropriate $23,500. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board:
1. Approve amendment No. 005 to the Professional Services Agreement, FD2020-005, with
360 Deep Cleaning Services, LLC for janitorial services and enhanced disinfecting and
surface sterilization services in the amount of $200,000;
2. Approve 360 Deep Cleaning Services, LLC as a single source vendor through June 30,
2023;
3. Authorize the appropriation of $23,500 to the Fire Fund (Fund 281) for current FY 2021-
22.
BACKGROUND:
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fire District identified the need for enhanced
cleaning, sterilization, and decontamination services in order to mitigate the spread of the virus in
fire stations and other facilities where first responders are housed or congregate in the
performance of their duties. Enhanced measures include aerosolized fogging decontamination of
large surface areas and additional cleaning of likely surface exposure areas in frequent contact
by Fire District personnel and visitors.
On July 1, 2020, the Fire District and 360 Deep Cleaning Services entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), FD2020-005, for janitorial services and enhanced disinfecting and
surface sterilization services. Since that time, the Fire District has amended the contract four
times to incrementally increase the total compensation from $19,999 to $100,000 in order to
ensure the safety Fire District personnel and visitors of services during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ANALYSIS:
In order to provide continuity of operations and ensure the health and safety of Fire District first
responders, staff recommends utilizing a single-source contract with 360 Deep Cleaning Services
to continue providing janitorial services and enhanced disinfecting and surface sterilization
Page 154
Page 2
9
8
9
services for all Fire District facilities through June 30, 2023.
In the time since their contract was initiated, 360 Deep Cleaning Services has met the needs of
the Fire District without exception, providing a measure of confidence and security to first
responders who are potentially exposed to COVID-19 on a routine basis as part of their assigned
duties. This is important to maintain critical availability of staff during critical periods of high wildfire
risk and potential resurgence of COVID-19 hospitalizations.
Contract cleaning services occasionally fail to meet the service levels as set in competitively
based contracts, leading to potential gaps in service that could compromise the safety and well-
being of Fire District personnel. Given the continued propagation of COVID-19 variants and recent
breakthrough infections, the Fire District recommends continuing the current contract with 360
Deep Cleaning Services until June 30, 2023 to reduce the risk factors associated with procuring
new janitorial and cleaning services during the still active pandemic.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amendment No. 005 to 360 Deep Cleaning Services Contract No. FD2020-005 increases the
total contract amount from $100,000 to $300,000 through June 30, 2023. For FY 2021-22, a total
of $90,000 was budgeted for janitorial services in 3281529-5304 (Fire Facilities Maintenance /
Contract Services – Facilities). An appropriation of $23,500 is needed for the amendment for
current FY 2021-22.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by mitigating the
spread of the COVID-19 virus in fire stations and other facilities where first responders are housed
or congregate in the performance of their duties.
ATTACHMENTS:
n/a
Page 155
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the West Side
of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street, Related to Case No.
SUBTT16578, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Bonds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the
development of Case No. SUBTT16578 and authorize the City Engineer to file the
appropriate Notice of Completion;
2. Release 90% of the Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Receipt No. 310558) for the
associated public improvements;
3. Release the Labor and Material Cash Bond (Receipt No. 310558); and
4. Retain 10% of Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Receipt No. 310558) as the
Maintenance Cash Bond to be released upon approval of the City Engineer after
successful completion of the 1-year warranty period.
BACKGROUND:
Case No. SUBTT16578 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2015 to
construct 6 single-family residences within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue. An
improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on June 2, 2021 to
ensure construction of the required public improvements.
ANALYSIS:
All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Blackstone Residential Operating
Partnership, LP., submitted the following securities to ensure satisfactory completion of the
improvements:
Faithful Performance Cash Bond $41,116 Receipt #310558
Labor and Materials Cash Bond $41,116 Receipt #310558
Page 156
Page 2
9
7
6
City staff conducted a final inspection of the public improvements on September 2, 2021 and
confirmed all work was completed to City standards. Typically, a separate maintenance bond in
the amount of 10% of the faithful performance bond would be submitted to the City once work is
completed. However, the developer has requested the City simply retain 10% of the faithful
performance cash bond amount as the maintenance cash bond for the satisfactory period (one
year from the final inspection).
With completion of the improvements, 90% of the Faithful Performance cash bond and Labor and
Materials cash bond are no longer required. The improvements will be reinspected in 10 months
and the remaining cash bond will be released upon approval of the City Engineer if no defects in
materials or workmanship are observed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high-
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 157
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
TR16578
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 158
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Darren Chin, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to DRC2017-
01023 as Complete, Located at the 9417 19th Street, South of 19th Street,
Between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman Avenue, Submitted by Steadfast
RC Senior, LLC. File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Bonds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the
development of DRC2017-01023, as complete, and authorize the City Engineer to file
the appropriate Notice of Completion;
2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #0721355 and accept Maintenance Bond #0721355
for the associated public improvements; and
3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On October 11, 2018, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission approved Case No.
DRC2017-01023 for development of the Sage Alta Loma residential care facility located at the
9417 19th Street, south of 19th Street, between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman Avenue. This
approval included conditions to construct certain off-site public improvements. On December 4,
2019, the improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council to ensure
construction of the required public improvements.
ANALYSIS:
All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine months to
ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond.
Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Steadfast RC Senior, LLC.,
submitted Faithful Performance Bond #0721355 in the amount of $99,800 to ensure satisfactory
completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this bond is no longer
required and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond #0721355 in the amount of $9,980
to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period.
Page 159
Page 2
9
8
2
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 160
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 161
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Reza Afzali for the
Sale of Fee Interest of a Portion of City Owned Parcels Located at 8204
Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill Country Club Drive Identified as a
Portion of APN 0207-112-04 & 0207-112-14 and Execution of a Related
Lot Line Adjustment. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of a fee interest of a
portion of City Owned Parcels located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive, identified as portions of APN 0207-112-04 and 0207-112-14;
2) Authorize the City Manager or his delegate to execute and sign all documents necessary
to effectuate the proposed sale; and
3) Authorize the City Manager to execute and sign a related lot line adjustment to incorporate
the subject property into the buyer’s adjacent parcel.
BACKGROUND:
In 1993, the City acquired the larger parcels located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill
Country Club Drive, approximately 400 ft east of the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive
and Foothill Boulevard. The larger parcels were acquired for use as planned right-of-way for the
future realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive; however, portions of each parcel have been
deemed unnecessary for the future realignment project. The portions under consideration for sale
to Mr. Afzali consist of approximately 1,094 square feet of land and are described in Exhibit “A”
and shown on Exhibit “B” (Property) of the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement. Resolution
No. 2021-112 is being considered separately in this agenda for the declaration of the Property as
Exempt Surplus Land pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 as it is not necessary for the
City’s use and finding that such declaration is exempt from environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2018-00936, submitted
by 8166 Foothill Boulevard LLC, for the development of a service station and convenience store
at 8166 Foothill Boulevard on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country
Club Drive to the west of the subject Property. The project’s design necessitates the acquisition
of approximately 1,094 square feet of Property owned by the City to accommodate the project’s
easterly north-south drive aisle and driveway to Red Hill Country Club Drive.
Page 162
Page 2
9
5
2
ANALYSIS:
The developer, Reza Afzali, has requested that the City sell the Property required to allow for
construction of the site improvements related to the planned service station and convenience
store. Based on Mr. Afzali’s request, staff evaluated the Property in question and determined that
it was not necessary for the construction of the future Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment
process and would be surplus after the realignment project was completed. Following this
determination, staff negotiated a proposed sale price for the property of $27,350 (a rate of $25
per square foot). Staff believes this price to be in line with current market values for similar
property in the area.
The attached Purchase and Sale Agreement outlines the term of the sale and responsibilities of
the parties and the transaction’s escrow officer. Escrow is anticipated to close by December 30,
2021 and the buyer would have a 45 day due diligence period at the beginning of the escrow
period.
In addition to the completion of the sale, the developer will be required to record a lot line
adjustment to incorporate the subject Property into the adjacent parcel owned by the buyer. While
lot line adjustments are administratively considered for approval by the City Engineer, it does
require execution by both property owners. In order to streamline the approval and recording
process for the lot line adjustment, it would be prudent for the City Manager or his delegate to be
authorized to sign the lot line adjustment on behalf of the City.
Moratorium
Related to the development of Case No. DRC2018-00936, on April 21, 2021, the City Council
approved Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980 establishing a moratorium for a period of
45 days on the approval of building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or
the expansion of existing service station uses. This moratorium was subsequently extended by
the City Council by Ordinance No. 981 until April 20, 2021. An exception to the moratorium was
included in Ordinance No. 980 for projects that had been “deemed complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued
a building permit for construction of redevelopment of the proposed services station within six
months of the moratorium’s effective date”. Case No. DRC2018-00936 is exempted from this
moratorium if building permits are issued by October 21, 2021. In addition to approval of building
plans and compliance with conditions of approval that would be due at issuance of a building
permit, prior to such issuance, the site grading would need to be completed and a pad elevation
certification issued by the project’s engineer of record and accepted by the City Engineer. As of
the date of the writing of this staff report, demolition of the existing structures and site
improvements has occurred, and the project’s grading permit has been issued to the developer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Proceeds, in the amount of $27,350, from the sale of the subject Property would be deposited
into Account No. 1025000-4440 (Capital Reserve Fund - Sale of Fixed Assets).
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Purchase and Sale Agreement
Page 163
ATTACHMENT 1
1
7
8
4
Vicinity Map
APN
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
1
4
APN: 0207-112-04Approximate Location of
Proposed Property Sale
Page 164
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
This Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions (this “Agreement”) is made
and entered into as of October 20, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and between REZA AFZALI
(“AFZALI”) (“Buyer”) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION (“CITY”) (the “Seller”), with respect to the following facts:
RECITALS
A.Seller is the owner of and desires to sell to Buyer:
(a)A 1,094 square foot partial fee acquisition over a portion of the real
property located at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill Country Club Drive in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and further identified as a
portion of San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0207-112-04 & 0207-112-14,
and more particularly described on Exhibit A, and depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, together with all of the interest of Seller in any and all rights and
appurtenances pertaining to such property, including any right, title and interest of Seller in and
to adjacent streets, alleys or rights-of-way (collectively, the “Land”); and
(b)The Land is hereinafter sometimes referred to herein as the “Subject
Property Interest.”
B.Buyer desires to purchase the Subject Property Interest from Seller.
C.By this Agreement, Seller is agreeing to sell the Subject Property Interest to
Buyer upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Buyer and
Seller agree as follows:
1.Purchase and Sale. Subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth, on the Close of Escrow (as defined in Section 2), Seller agrees to sell to
Buyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller, the Subject Property Interest.
2.Opening and Closing of Escrow. Within five (5) days after the Effective Date, an
escrow (the “Escrow”) shall be opened with Stewart Title Company (the “Escrow Holder”),
1200 California Street, Redlands, CA 92374, Attention: Joyce Strohm, Escrow Officer,
Telephone: (909) 363-4836; Email: JStrohm@stewart.com (“Opening of Escrow”). Upon the
Opening of Escrow, the parties hereto shall deposit a fully executed original of this Agreement
with Escrow Holder and this Agreement shall serve as the instructions to Escrow Holder for
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. Seller and Buyer agree to execute such
additional and supplementary escrow instructions as may be appropriate to enable Escrow
Holder to comply with the terms of this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event of any
conflict between the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the terms and provisions of any
supplementary escrow instructions, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.
ATTACHMENT 2Page165
2
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
The “Close of Escrow” or “Closing” shall be the date that a permanent easement deed for the
Property in favor of Buyer is recorded in the Official Records of the San Bernardino County
Recorder’s Office. The Close of Escrow shall occur within fifteen (15) days after the expiration
of the Due Diligence Period (as hereinafter defined), but not later than December 30, 2021 (the
“Closing Date”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller at its option may extend the Close of
Escrow for two (2) periods of thirty (30) days each; provided that Seller shall provide Buyer with
written notice of such an extension of the Close of Escrow at least thirty (30) days prior to the
then currently scheduled Close of Escrow.
3. Purchase Price; Deposit; Escrow Account.
(a) The purchase price for the Property to be paid by Buyer is the sum of $25
per square foot or a sum of Twenty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($27,350.00).
Thus, the total amount to be paid to Seller is the sum of Twenty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($27,350.00) (the “Purchase Price”)
(b) Within five (5) business days after the Effective Date, Buyer shall deliver
to Escrow Holder an earnest money deposit in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00)
(the “Deposit”) in the form of a cashier’s check, or other form acceptable to the Escrow Holder.
The Deposit shall be placed in an interest-bearing bank account (the “Escrow Account”) and all
interest accruing thereon shall increase and become a part of the Deposit. On the Close of
Escrow, the Deposit shall be applied toward the cash payment of the Purchase Price. The
remaining balance of the cash payment of the Purchase Price shall be payable by Buyer in the
form of a cashier’s check, or other form acceptable to Seller and the Escrow Holder and placed
in the Escrow Account no later than one (1) business day prior to the Close of Escrow. In the
event that Buyer terminates this Agreement by written notice to Seller on or prior to the
expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 9) in accordance with the terms and
provisions hereof, the Deposit shall be refunded to Buyer, less any and all cancellation fees
charged by the Escrow Holder and/or Title Company. Upon the expiration of the Due Diligence
Period, if this Agreement has not been terminated or deemed terminated as provided herein, the
Deposit shall become non-refundable and shall be applied toward the Purchase Price at the Close
of Escrow or released to and retained by Seller if the Close of Escrow does not occur as the
result of (i) a default by Buyer or (ii) Buyer’s termination of this Agreement (except in the event
of a default by Seller or the failure of a condition precedent to Buyer’s obligations under this
Agreement as provided in Section 12).
4. Delivery of Documents on the Close of Escrow.
(a) On the Close of Escrow, Seller covenants and agrees to cause to be
delivered to Buyer a duly executed and acknowledged Grant Deed in the form attached as
Exhibit C hereto (the “Grant Deed”) conveying to Buyer a fee simple interest over a portion of
the Property subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions (as defined in Section 5) approved by
Buyer, as provided below.
(b) At the Close of Escrow, Buyer shall receive the Title Policy (as defined in
Section 5) issued by Stewart Title Company (the “Title Company”), 11870 Pierce Street, #100 ,
Riverside, CA 92505, Attention: Kathy Crawford, Title Officer, Phone: (951)276-2700 x 6
Page 166
3
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
Email:KCrawfor.stewart.com, insuring in Buyer fee title in the Subject Property Interest, free
and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than the Permitted Title Exceptions (as defined in
Section 5).
5. Title and Title Insurance.
(a) Within five (5) days after the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer
a preliminary title report for the Property from Title Company together with copies of all
instruments noted as exceptions therein (the “Preliminary Title Report”), and the most recent
ALTA survey of the Property, if any, in Seller’s possession or under Seller’s control. Buyer
shall also have the option of ordering, at its cost, an ALTA survey for the Property pursuant to
the terms set forth in Section 14 (the “Survey”).
(b) Buyer shall have until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period to
disapprove any exceptions to title shown on the Preliminary Title Report or reflected on the
Survey (collectively, “Disapproved Exceptions”) and to provide Seller with notice of
disapproval in writing describing the defect with reasonable particularity (the “Disapproval
Notice”). Any exceptions to title not disapproved by Buyer within such period shall be deemed
approved. Within five (5) business days of Seller’s receipt of a Disapproval Notice, Seller shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to notify Buyer in writing that Seller intends to remove the
Disapproved Exceptions. If Seller notifies Buyer of an intention to eliminate the Disapproved
Exceptions, Seller shall do so concurrently with or prior to the Close of Escrow; provided,
however, if such Disapproved Exception is not susceptible of removal and cure prior to the Close
of Escrow despite Seller’s commercially reasonable efforts, the scheduled date for the Close of
Escrow shall be automatically extended by a reasonable additional time to effect such a cure, but
in no event shall the extension exceed thirty (30) days after the Closing Date. If Seller does not
elect to remove any of the Disapproved Exceptions, Buyer, by notifying in writing Seller within
three (3) business days after the expiration of Seller’s election period, may elect to terminate this
Agreement or to take the Property subject to the Disapproved Exceptions. In any event, Seller
covenants to pay in full all loans secured by mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering the
Property and to remove any mechanics liens and any other monetary liens encumbering the
Property (other than current real property taxes and assessments which are not due and payable)
prior to or concurrently with the Close of Escrow; provided, however, Seller shall have the right
to bond over mechanic’s liens so long as such bond is reasonably acceptable in form and
substance to the Buyer and is sufficient to allow the Title Company to insure over such liens in
the Title Policy (defined below). The Title Policy shall include such endorsements as Buyer
shall reasonably request and which Title Company agrees to issue on or before the expiration of
the Due Diligence Period. Any title policy endorsements are to be paid for by Buyer. Whether
or not Buyer shall have furnished to Seller any notice of Disapproved Exceptions pursuant to the
foregoing provisions of this Agreement, Buyer may, at or prior to the Close of Escrow, notify
Seller in writing of any objections to title first raised by the Title Company between (a) the last
date on which Buyer is entitled to make such an objection as set forth above and (b) the date on
which the transaction contemplated herein is scheduled to close. With respect to any
Disapproved Exceptions set forth in such notice, Seller shall have the same option to cure (or in
the case of a monetary lien, the obligation to obtain the removal or bonding thereof as provided
above) and Buyer shall have the same option to accept title subject to such matters or to
terminate this Agreement as those which apply to any notice of Disapproved Exceptions made by
Page 167
4
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
Buyer before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. If Seller elects to attempt to cure any
such matters, the scheduled date for the Close of Escrow shall be automatically extended by a
reasonable additional time to effect such a cure, but in no event shall the extension exceed thirty
(30) days after the scheduled date for the Close of Escrow set forth in Section 2.
(c) Buyer’s obligation to consummate the purchase contemplated by this
Agreement is conditioned upon the irrevocable commitment by the Title Company, issued on or
before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, and reconfirmed not later than one (1)
business day prior to the Closing Date, to issue a CLTA Standard Coverage Owner’s Policy of
Title Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price, issued by Title Company (the “Title
Policy”). The Title Policy shall insure Buyer’s fee interest in the Subject Property Interest
subject only to the following permitted conditions of title (the “Permitted Title Exceptions”):
(i) General and special real property taxes and assessments for the
then current tax fiscal year which are a lien not then due and payable;
(ii) The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of
any municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property;
(iii) Such other exceptions listed in the Preliminary Title Report that
have been approved, or been deemed approved, by Buyer as provided in Section 5(b); and
(iv) Any exceptions directly or indirectly caused by Buyer or Buyer’s
agents, employees or contractors.
At Buyer’s election and cost, Buyer may cause the Title Company to provide Buyer with
an ALTA Extended Coverage Owner’s Policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer’s receipt
of an ALTA policy shall only be a condition to closing provided that Buyer pays the cost of the
ALTA policy in excess of the cost of a CLTA policy and Buyer obtains an ALTA survey
acceptable to the Title Company prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Seller shall
not encumber the Property during the period from the Effective Date to the Close of Escrow or
the date of the termination of this Agreement. From and after the Effective Date and prior to the
end of the Due Diligence Period (as hereinafter defined), Seller shall not amend or terminate any
Lease or enter into any new lease with respect to the Property without having given Buyer prior
written notice of such action. After the end of the Due Diligence Period and prior to the Close of
Escrow, Seller shall not amend or terminate any Lease or enter into any new lease with respect to
the Property without Buyer’s consent, which consent may be granted or withheld in the sole and
absolute discretion of Buyer.
6. Deposit of Documents and Funds in Escrow.
(a) Seller and Buyer, as applicable, hereby covenant and agree to deliver to
Escrow Holder at least one (1) business day prior to the Close of Escrow the below listed
instruments, documents, and funds, the delivery of each of which shall be a condition of the
Close of Escrow.
(b) Seller shall deliver:
Page 168
5
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
(i) The Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller;
(ii) A Withholding Exemption Certificate Form 593-C as
contemplated by California Revenue and Taxation Code §18662 (the “Withholding Affidavit”)
duly executed by Seller;
(iii) A Certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with Internal
Revenue Code Section 1445 duly executed by Seller;
(iv) Such proof of Seller’s authority and authorization to enter into this
transaction as the Title Company may reasonably require in order to issue the Title Policy; and
(c) Buyer shall deliver:
(i) The balance of Purchase Price together with such funds as are
required to pay for costs and expenses payable by Buyer hereunder; and
(ii) Such proof of Buyer’s authority and authorization to enter into this
transaction as the Title Company may reasonably require in order to issue the Title Policy.
Each of the Buyer and Seller may waive any condition of the Close of Escrow to be
performed by the other and set forth in this Section 6.
7. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. Escrow Holder is
hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and distribute the documents
called for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has
then been fulfilled:
(a) The Title Company is irrevocably committed to issue in favor of Buyer the
Title Policy, with a liability in the amount of the Purchase Price, as set forth in Section 5(c).
(b) Escrow Holder shall have received Buyer’s authorization to close and
Buyer’s notice of approval or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies/conditions to
Buyer’s obligations hereunder, as provided for in Section 12;
(c) Escrow Holder shall have received Seller’s authorization to close and
Seller’s notice of approval or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies/conditions to
Seller’s obligations hereunder, as provided for in Section 13; and
(d) Seller and Buyer shall have deposited in Escrow the documents and funds
required pursuant to Section 6.
Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record at the Close
of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for the issuance
of the Title Policy.
8. Escrow Charges and Proration.
Page 169
6
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
(a) Seller shall pay none of the fees and charges of Escrow Holder. If the
Escrow shall fail to close due to Seller’s default or a failure of a condition precedent to Buyer’s
obligations under this Agreement as provided in Section 12, Seller shall pay all Escrow
cancellation charges.
(b) Buyer shall pay (i) all of the fees and charges of Escrow Holder, (ii) the
cost of the premium for the CLTA Standard Coverage portion of the Title Policy, (iii) the cost of
all endorsements to the Title Policy, (iv) all costs and charges for the recordation of the Grant
Deed, and (v) Buyer’s share of the charges prorated under this Agreement. If the Escrow shall
fail to close due to Buyer’s default or a failure of a condition precedent to Seller’s obligations
under this Agreement as provided in Section 13, Buyer shall pay all Escrow cancellation charges.
9. Due Diligence Period; Access. During the period commencing on the Effective
Date and ending at 5:00 p.m. on the date which is forty-five (45) days thereafter (the “Due
Diligence Period”), Buyer may inspect the Property as necessary to approve all zoning and land
use matters relating to the Property and to approve the physical condition of the Property subject
to the limitations set forth below.
(a) Within five (5) days after the Effective Date, Seller shall provide to Buyer,
any and all of the following documents to the extent in Seller's possession or under Seller’s
control: environmental materials (as described in Section 10(a)(i) and (iv)) soils and geological
testing or reports, structural engineering reports, plans and specifications, utility contracts,
service contracts, brokerage agreements, and property tax bills for each of the two (2) prior fiscal
years. It is understood by the parties hereto that Seller does not make any representation or
warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in
Seller’s files or in the documents produced by Seller, including without limitation, any
environmental audit or report prepared by unaffiliated third party consultant. To the extent
permitted by law, Buyer shall keep all information provided by the Seller confidential and shall
not disclose it to any third parties except its accountants, legal counsel, and other consultants
employed in connection with its acquisition of the Property. In the event this Agreement is
terminated, Buyer shall promptly return to Seller all such documentation and other information
obtained from or otherwise provided by Seller. Buyer shall provide Seller with copies of all
reports, test results, surveys and other written materials obtained by Buyer in connection with its
investigation of the Property promptly following Buyer’s receipt thereof. Buyer may terminate
this Agreement in Buyer’s sole and absolute discretion for any reason, or for no reason
whatsoever, by giving written notice to the Seller on any day prior to and including the final day
of the Due Diligence Period, in which event, this Agreement shall become null and void and,
except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, neither party shall have any further rights, duties
and obligations hereunder, and Buyer shall be entitled to the immediate refund of the Deposit.
(b) Subject to Buyer’s compliance with the terms of this Section 9, Buyer and
its agents, attorneys, accountants, and other representatives shall have the right, at Buyer’s sole
cost and expense, to enter upon the Property during the Due Diligence Period to make
inspections and other examinations of the Property and the improvements thereon. Buyer’s
physical inspection of the Property shall be conducted during normal business hours at times
mutually acceptable to Buyer and Seller. Buyer shall give Seller at least 24 hours prior notice of
any entry onto the Property and Seller shall have the right to be present during any such entry or
Page 170
7
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
inspections. No invasive testing or boring shall be done without the prior notification of Seller
and Seller’s written permission of the same, which permission may be withheld in Seller’s sole
and absolute discretion. Buyer shall promptly repair any damage to the Property caused by its
inspections and investigations. To evidence Buyer’s right of entry to the Property, the parties
shall execute and deliver that certain Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit F
within three (3) days following the Effective Date.
10. Warranties, Representations and Covenants of Seller. Seller hereby represents,
warrants and covenants to Buyer the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all
such representations and warranties are true and correct in all material respects as of the
Effective Date. If the Seller acquires additional knowledge regarding the matters which are the
subject of the warranties or representations contained in this Section 10 which would cause any
of such warranties or representations to be incorrect in any material respect prior to the Close of
Escrow, Seller shall give prompt written notice thereof to Buyer. Within seven (7) business days
following receipt of such notice, Buyer may elect to cancel this Agreement and receive a refund
of the Deposit. As of the Close of Escrow, the warranties and representations contained in this
Section 10 shall be true and correct in all material respects, subject to any matters disclosed in
writing by Seller to Buyer as provided herein.
(a) Hazardous Substances.
(i) To Seller’s actual knowledge, except as otherwise described in
Exhibit D, Seller has received no written notice, warning, notice of violation, administrative
complaint, judicial complaint, or other formal or informal notice alleging that conditions on the
Property are or have been in violation of any Environmental Law (as defined in Exhibit E), or
informing Seller that the Property is subject to investigation or inquiry regarding Hazardous
Substances (as defined in Exhibit E) on the Property or the potential violation of any
Environmental Law.
(ii) To Seller’s actual knowledge, except as otherwise described in
Exhibit D, there is no monitoring program required by the Environmental Protection Agency or
any similar state agency concerning the Property.
(iii) To Seller’s actual knowledge, except as otherwise described in
Exhibit D, no toxic or hazardous chemicals, waste, or substances of any kind have ever been
spilled, disposed of, or stored on, under, or at the Property, whether by accident, burying,
drainage, or storage in containers, tanks, or holding areas, or by any other means.
(iv) To Seller’s actual knowledge, Seller has produced a list of all
information, records, reports and studies maintained by Seller or under Seller’s control in
connection with the Property concerning Hazardous Substances and all existing orders and
directives from or agreements with any governmental agency pertaining to the environmental
condition of the Property and any requests for information, documents, access or investigation
pertaining thereto and such list is contained in Exhibit D attached hereto. To the extent that
certain documents contain confidential information, Buyer shall sign a confidentiality agreement
as a condition to Buyer’s review of such confidential documents.
Page 171
8
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
(v) To Seller’s actual knowledge, Seller has received no written
request, directive, administrative order or judicial order to impose any type of land use restriction
or institutional control relating to Hazardous Substances on the Property.
(b) Seller has full right and power to execute, deliver and perform its
obligations under this Agreement, and when executed and delivered, Seller and all parties having
an interest in the Property shall be lawfully bound by the terms of this Agreement. Seller is the
sole owner of the Property, to Seller’s actual knowledge, the Property is free and clear of all
liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may
appear on the Preliminary Title report, and free and clear of encroachments on the Property from
adjacent properties, encroachments by improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent
property, other than those that may appear on any Survey provided by Seller to Buyer or which
Buyer otherwise obtains as described in Section 5(a). Seller shall not further transfer or
encumber the Property or allow the Property to be further encumbered prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(c) To Seller’s actual knowledge there is no pending or threatened litigation,
which does or may adversely affect the Property.
(d) To Seller’s actual knowledge, there are no written or oral commitments to
or agreements with any governmental authority or agency materially and adversely affecting the
Property, or any part thereof or any interest therein, which will survive the Close of Escrow other
than those that may appear on the Preliminary Title Report. Seller has entered into no
understanding or agreement with any taxing or assessing authority respecting the imposition or
deferment of any taxes or assessments respecting the Property.
(e) Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder
including the transfer of title to the Property to Buyer, violates or shall violate, any contract,
instrument, partnership agreement, trust agreement, or any other agreement to which Seller is a
party, and which affects the Property or any part thereof, and the sale of the Property herein
contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto.
(f) Seller is not a “foreign person” within the meaning of Section 1445(f)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
(g) There are no (i) assignable contracts and agreements (collectively, the
“Operating Agreements”) relating to or affecting the Property to which the Seller is a party or
is obligated and pertaining to the upkeep, repair, maintenance, operation, or remediation of the
Property which will survive the Close of Escrow, (ii) assignable existing warranties and
guaranties (expressed or implied) issued to Seller in connection with the Improvements
(collectively, the “Intangibles”); (iii) personal property items owned by Seller (collectively, the
“Personal Property”) on the Property; or (iv) other contracts or agreements, such as
maintenance, service, or utility contracts relating to or affecting the Property to which Seller is a
party or is obligated which will survive the Close of Escrow.
(h) Seller agrees to indemnify Buyer and agrees to defend and hold Buyer
harmless from all actual, reasonable out-of-pocket loss, costs, liability, expense, damage, or other
Page 172
9
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
injury, including without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and all other costs and
expenses incurred by reason of, or in any manner resulting from the breach of any warranties and
representations in this Section 10. The provisions of this Section 10 shall survive the Close of
Escrow or the termination of this Agreement for a period of two (2) years.
As used anywhere in this Agreement, the terms “actual knowledge” and “to Seller’s
actual knowledge” refers to the actual knowledge of the City of Rancho Cucamonga without the
obligation to undertake any investigation or inquiry.
11. Warranties, Representations and Covenants of Buyer. Buyer hereby represents,
warrants and covenants to Seller the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all
such representations and warranties are true and correct in all material respects as of the
Effective Date. If Buyer acquires additional knowledge regarding the matters which are the
subject of the representations or warranties contained in this Section 11 which would cause any
of such representations or warranties to be incorrect in any material respect prior to the Close of
Escrow, Buyer shall give prompt written notice thereof to Seller. Within seven (7) business days
of receipt of such notice, Seller may elect to cancel this Agreement and Buyer shall be entitled to
receive a refund of the Deposit. As of the Close of Escrow, the representations and warranties
contained in this Section 11 shall be true and correct in all material respects, subject to any
matters disclosed in writing by Buyer to Seller as herein provided.
(a) Buyer has the full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement
and has taken all action necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement has been duly and validly authorized by
Buyer, and no other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery, and
performance of this Agreement by Buyer.
(b) There is no pending litigation or, to the best of Buyer’s knowledge,
threatened litigation, which does or will materially adversely affect Buyer’s ability to
consummate this transaction.
(c) This Agreement and all documents executed by Buyer which are to be
delivered to Seller at or prior to the Closing are, or at the time of Closing will be, duly
authorized, executed, and delivered by Buyer, are or at the time of Closing, will be legal, valid
and binding obligations of Buyer, enforceable in accordance with their terms, and do not and at
the time of Closing will not violate any provisions of any agreement or judicial order to which
Buyer is a party or to which Buyer is subject.
(d) Buyer agrees to indemnify Seller and agrees to defend and hold Seller
harmless from all actual, reasonable out-of-pocket loss, costs, liability, expense, damage, or other
injury, including without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and all other costs and
expenses incurred by reason of, or in any manner resulting from the breach of any warranties and
representations in this Section 11. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the Close of
Escrow or the termination of this Agreement for a period of two (2) years.
12. Buyer’s Conditions. For the benefit of the Buyer, the Close of Escrow and
Buyer’s obligation to consummate the purchase of Property shall be contingent upon and subject
Page 173
10
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
to written notice to Escrow Holder by Buyer of the occurrence of all of the following conditions
precedent (or Buyer’s written waiver thereof, it being agreed that Buyer can waive any or all
such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(a) Buyer’s obtaining a satisfactory commitment issued by Title Company to
issue the Title Policy in favor of Buyer with a liability amount equal to the Purchase Price
showing Buyer’s fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions, and
being otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Section 5 of this Agreement, and expressly
insuring against the claims of any persons in possession, other than Seller, of all or any part of
the Property and the claims of any mechanics or materialmen.
(b) Buyer’s verifying that there are no mechanics’ and/or materialmen’s liens,
or lis pendens actions affecting the Property, and that all taxes, sewer, water, and utility bills
have been paid.
(c) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and warranties of Seller
contained in this Agreement are either all true and correct in all material respects or, to the extent
that is not the case, have been waived by Buyer.
(d) Seller’s delivery of all documents required to be delivered by Seller
pursuant to Section 6 hereof.
(e) Buyer’s approval, prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, of
the physical condition of the Property, including without limitation, any and all inspections, tests,
survey(s), if any, and other studies to be conducted by Buyer, in Buyer’s sole discretion.
(f) If Buyer has elected to obtain the same, Buyer’s obtaining and approving
the Survey provided for herein prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period.
If all the foregoing conditions precedent have not been either met to Buyer’s sole
satisfaction or expressly waived in writing by Buyer on or before the respective dates set forth
therein, or if no date is set forth therein on or prior to the Close of Escrow, then this Agreement
shall, at the option of Buyer, become null and void, in which event, except as expressly set forth
in this Agreement, neither party shall have any further rights, duties and obligations hereunder,
and Buyer shall be entitled to the immediate refund of the Deposit.
13. Seller’s Conditions. For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow and Seller’s
obligation to consummate the sale of the fee simple interest in a portion of the Property, shall be
contingent upon and subject to written notice to the Escrow Holder by Seller of the occurrence of
all of the following conditions precedent (or Seller’s written waiver thereof, it being agreed that
Seller can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(a) Deposit by Buyer of the Purchase Price and all other sums to be deposited
by Buyer in Escrow in accordance with the requirements hereof.
(b) Buyer’s delivery of all documents required to be delivered by Buyer
pursuant to Section 6 hereof and performance of all other material covenants and agreements to
be performed by Buyer under this Agreement.
Page 174
11
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
(c) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and warranties of Buyer
contained in this Agreement are all either true and correct in all material respects or, to the extent
that is not the case, have been waived by Seller.
14. Survey. Buyer, at Buyer’s sole cost and expense, may obtain an ALTA survey
acceptable to the Title Company prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period.
15. Destruction/Condemnation. In the event that prior to the Close of Escrow, the
Property, or any portion thereof, is damaged by fire, earthquake, or other casualty, or is subject
to a taking by a public authority other than Buyer, then Buyer shall have the right, exercisable by
giving notice to Seller within fifteen (15) days after receiving written notice of such damage or
taking, either (a) to terminate this Agreement, in which case neither party shall have any further
rights or obligations hereunder, except that (i) Buyer and Seller shall each be responsible for one
half (½) of any cancellation fees charged by the Escrow Holder and/or the Title Company and
(ii) the Deposit and any other funds deposited into Escrow by Buyer, including interest thereon,
shall be refunded to Buyer, or (b) to accept the Property in its then condition and proceed with
the Closing, and to receive an assignment of all of Seller’s rights to any proceeds of insurance or
condemnation awards payable by reason of such damage or taking. If Buyer elects to proceed
under the preceding clause (b), there shall be no adjustment to the Purchase Price and Seller shall
not compromise, settle or adjust any claims to such proceeds of insurance or condemnation
awards. Seller agrees to give Buyer prompt notice of any damage to or taking of the Property
promptly after Seller receives notice of the same.
Buyer’s Initials:__________ Seller’s Initials:__________
16. Disposition of Deposit. IF THE TRANSACTION HEREIN PROVIDED SHALL
NOT BE CLOSED BY REASON OF SELLER’S DEFAULT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR
THE FAILURE OF SATISFACTION OF THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 12
HEREOF, AND BUYER SHALL NOT HAVE DEFAULTED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT,
THEN THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE RETURNED TO BUYER, AND NEITHER PARTY
SHALL HAVE ANY FURTHER OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY TO THE OTHER;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, IF THE TRANSACTIONS HEREUNDER SHALL FAIL TO
CLOSE BY REASON OF SELLER’S DEFAULT, AND BUYER SHALL HAVE FULLY
PERFORMED ITS OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER AND SHALL BE READY, WILLING
AND ABLE TO CLOSE, THEN BUYER SHALL BE ENTITLED TO SPECIFICALLY
ENFORCE THIS AGREEMENT (BUT NO OTHER ACTION, FOR DAMAGES OR
OTHERWISE, SHALL BE PERMITTED). IF BUYER FAILS TO COMPLETE THE
PURCHASE OF THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AS
HEREIN PROVIDED BY REASON OF ANY DEFAULT OF BUYER, IT IS AGREED THAT
THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE NON-REFUNDABLE AND SELLER SHALL BE ENTITLED TO
SUCH DEPOSIT, WHICH AMOUNT SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY SELLER AS
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND NOT AS A PENALTY AND AS SELLER’S SOLE AND
EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. IT IS AGREED THAT SAID AMOUNT CONSTITUTES A
REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE DAMAGES TO SELLER PURSUANT TO
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1671 ET SEQ. BUYER AND SELLER AGREE
THAT IT WOULD BE IMPRACTICAL OR IMPOSSIBLE TO PRESENTLY PREDICT
WHAT MONETARY DAMAGES SELLER WOULD SUFFER UPON BUYER’S FAILURE
Page 175
12
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
TO COMPLETE ITS PURCHASE OF THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN A PORTION OF
THE PROPERTY. BUYER DESIRES TO LIMIT THE MONETARY DAMAGES FOR
WHICH IT MIGHT BE LIABLE HEREUNDER AND BUYER AND SELLER DESIRE TO
AVOID THE COSTS AND DELAYS THEY WOULD INCUR IF A LAWSUIT WERE
COMMENCED TO RECOVER DAMAGES OR OTHERWISE ENFORCE SELLER’S
RIGHTS. IF FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY ESCROW HOLDER TO
EFFECTUATE THE TERMS OF THIS PARAGRAPH, BUYER AND SELLER AGREE TO
EXECUTE THE SAME. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THIS PROVISION BY
PLACING THEIR INITIALS BELOW:
__________________________ __________________________
BUYER SELLER
17. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail,
postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery (by recognized courier
service or otherwise). Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery
or (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid,
certified or registered, return receipt requested. A copy of all notices shall be sent to Escrow
Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided that if
any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
Seller: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attn: Jason Welday
Phone: (909) 477-2700
email: Jason.Welday@cityofrc.us
Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attn.: Regina N. Danner, Esq.
Phone: (213) 626-8484
Fax: (213) 626-0078
email: rdanner@rwglaw.com
Buyer: Reza Afzali
8530 Mulholland Drive
Los Angeles, California 90046
Phone: (310) 877-5428
email: rafzali922@gmail.com
Page 176
13
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
Escrow Holder: Stewart Title Company
1200 California Street
Redlands, California 92374
Attention: Joyce Strohm
Escrow Officer
Telephone: (909) 363-4836
email: jstrohm@steward.com
18. Broker’s Commissions. Buyer is represented by a real estate agent or broker in
this transaction. Buyer’s brokerage firm is Delmar Commercial Real Estate Services, and
Donald Barmakian is Buyer’s agent. Seller represents that it has not incurred liability for
brokerage commission or finder’s fee arising from or relating to the transaction contemplated by
this Agreement. Buyer is responsible for payment of any brokerage commission in this action.
This Section 18 is intended to be solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and is not intended to
benefit, nor may it be relied upon by, any person or entity not a party to this Agreement. This
Section 18 shall survive the Close of Escrow and the delivery of the Grant Deed.
19. Time is of the Essence. The parties hereto agree that time is of the essence with
respect to each term, condition and covenant hereof.
20. Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement are expressly binding
upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their successors in interest and
assigns.
21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with all exhibits hereto, integrates
all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all
negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with
respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.
22. Severability. Invalidation of any of the terms, conditions, covenants, or other
provisions contained herein by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other
terms, conditions, covenants, or provisions hereof, and the same shall remain in full force and
effect.
23. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only when
duly executed by Seller and Buyer and deposited with Escrow Holder.
24. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that suit is brought for the enforcement of this
Agreement or as the result of any alleged breach thereof, the prevailing party or parties in such
suit shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses from the
losing party or parties, and any judgment or decree rendered in such proceedings shall include an
award thereof.
25. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of Seller and Buyer and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
Page 177
14
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
26. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, facsimile signatures shall be deemed to be original
signatures, and shall be followed by the immediate overnight delivery of original signature
pages.
28. Assignment of Agreement. Neither Buyer nor Seller may assign or transfer their
respective rights or obligations under this Agreement without first obtaining the prior written
consent of the other, which consent may be granted or withheld in the sole and absolute
discretion of the applicable party.
29. Interpretation. Whenever used herein, the term “including” shall be deemed to be
followed by the words “without limitation.” Words used in the singular number shall include the
plural, and vice-versa, and any gender shall be deemed to include each other gender.
30. Captions. The captions and headings of the Articles and Sections of this
Agreement are for convenience of reference only, and shall not be deemed to define or limit the
provisions hereof.
31. Exhibits. The exhibits and schedules attached hereto are hereby incorporated by
reference herein.
32. Effect of Waiver. A waiver by either party hereto shall not affect either party's
right to enforce the provisions contained herein, nor shall any extension or waiver be held to be
an extension of time or waiver of any prior or subsequent breach of the same or any other
obligation under this Agreement.
33. Confidentiality. Buyer acknowledges that, during the course of its due diligence,
the information it will receive with respect to the Property and Seller is confidential in nature.
Buyer agrees (unless otherwise required by law) not to disclose such information to any third
party and to keep such information confidential, except for disclosures which may be made to
Buyer's attorneys, accountants, and other consultants employed for the purpose of facilitating the
transactions contemplated hereby, provided that Buyer makes all such parties aware of the
confidentiality requirements set forth herein, and causes such parties to abide by this Section.
34. No Memorandum. The parties agree that neither this Agreement nor a
memorandum hereof shall be recorded, as the parties intend to maintain the confidentiality of the
transactions contemplated hereby.
Page 178
15
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
Page 179
16
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of
the date first above written.
“Buyer”
REZA AFZALI
Reza Afzali
“Seller”
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By:
Name: John Gillison
Title: City Manager
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Richards, Watson & Gershon,
A Professional Corporation
By:
Regina N. Danner,
Deputy City Attorney
Page 180
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 10 OF TRACT NO. 2521 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS, WHICH WAS VACATED BY THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. 83-
130 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-225182, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 20
FEET WIDE, LYING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE
NORTH 59°25’30” WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 42.44 FEET TO
A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES) SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE SOUTH 89°47’47” EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.80
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 451.56 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 18.19 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°18’28”; THENCE SOUTH 30°12’29” EAST, 30.87 FEET TO A POINT ON
A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 507.49 FEET (A
RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 52°02’28” WEST);
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 68.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 07°41’11”; THENCE SOUTH 30°37’55” WEST, 50.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°04’23” WEST,
7.37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH
30°34’30” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 123.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 1,094
SQUARE FEET.
SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, OFFERS OF
DEDICATION, RIGHTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD, IF ANY
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED,
CHECKED AND APPROVED BY:
OCTOBER 7, 2021
JACK C. LEE DATE
P.L.S. NO. 8407
REGISTRATION EXPIRES:
06/30/2022
Page 181
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION NPOR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022 Page 182
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITIONNEXHIBIT "B"
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
POR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022Page183
1
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF GRANT DEED
Page 184
11231-0001\2583122v1.doc
GRANT DEED
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Stewart Title Company
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Reza Afzali
8530 Mulholland Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90046
APN: 0207-112-04 & 14 [SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY]
GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:
The undersigned declares that this Grant Deed is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant
to California Government Code Section 27383 and exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax
pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922.
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged City
of Rancho Cucamonga (“Grantor”) hereby grants to Reza Afzali, (“Grantee”), a portion of
certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California, more particularly described on Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SUBJECT TO:
1. General and special real property taxes and assessments and supplemental
assessments for the current fiscal year;
2. All liens, encumbrances, easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions of
record; and
3. All matters which would be revealed or disclosed in an accurate survey of the
property.
Page 185
-2-
11231-0001\2583122v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of the date set forth
below.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated: ___________ ____, 2021 _____________________________________
L.Dennis Michael, Mayor
Page 186
-3-
11231-0001\2583122v1.doc
A Notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached,
and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that
document.
State of California )
)
County of __________ )
On _______________, 2017, before me, ________________, Notary Public, personally
appeared, _____________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_____________________________________
Signature (Seal)
Page 187
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 10 OF TRACT NO. 2521 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS, WHICH WAS VACATED BY THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. 83-
130 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-225182, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 20
FEET WIDE, LYING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE
NORTH 59°25’30” WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 42.44 FEET TO
A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES) SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE SOUTH 89°47’47” EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.80
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 451.56 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 18.19 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°18’28”; THENCE SOUTH 30°12’29” EAST, 30.87 FEET TO A POINT ON
A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 507.49 FEET (A
RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 52°02’28” WEST);
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 68.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 07°41’11”; THENCE SOUTH 30°37’55” WEST, 50.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°04’23” WEST,
7.37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH
30°34’30” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 123.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 1,094
SQUARE FEET.
SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, OFFERS OF
DEDICATION, RIGHTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD, IF ANY
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED,
CHECKED AND APPROVED BY:
OCTOBER 7, 2021
JACK C. LEE DATE
P.L.S. NO. 8407
REGISTRATION EXPIRES:
06/30/2022
GRANT DEED
Page 188
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION NPOR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022
GRANT DEED
Page 189
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITIONNEXHIBIT "B"
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
POR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022
GRANT DEED
Page 190
1
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
EXHIBIT D
DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
None Known
Page 191
1
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
EXHIBIT E
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Environmental Laws means all federal, state, local, or municipal laws, rules, orders,
regulations, statutes, ordinances, codes, decrees, or requirements of any government authority
regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any Hazardous
Substance (as later defined), or pertaining to occupational health or industrial hygiene (and only
to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene laws, ordinances, or regulations
relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property), occupational or environmental
conditions on, under, or about the Property, as now or may at any later time be in effect,
including without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) [42 USCS §§ 9601 et seq.]; the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) [42 USCS §§ 6901 et seq.]; the Clean Water Act, also known as
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) [33 USCS §§ 1251 et seq.]; the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) [15 USCS §§ 2601 et seq.]; the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act (HMTA) [49 USCS §§ 1801 et seq.]; the Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide
Act [7 USCS §§ 136 et seq.]; the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act [42 USCS
§§ 6901 et seq.]; the Clean Air Act [42 USCS §§ 7401 et seq.]; the Safe Drinking Water Act [42
USCS §§ 300f et seq.]; the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 USCS §§ 6901 et seq.]; the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act [30 USCS §§ 1201 et seq.]; the Emergency Planning and
Community Right to Know Act [42 USCS §§ 11001 et seq.]; the Occupational Safety and Health
Act [29 USCS §§ 655 and 657]; the California Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances
Act [H & S C §§ 25280 et seq.]; the California Hazardous Substances Account Act [H & S C
§§ 25300 et seq.]; the California Hazardous Waste Control Act [H & S C §§ 25100 et seq.]; the
California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act [H & S C §§ 24249.5 et seq.]; the
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act [Wat C §§ 13000 et seq.] together with any amendments of or
regulations promulgated under the statutes cited above and any other federal, state, or local law,
statute, ordinance, or regulation now in effect or later enacted that pertains to occupational health
or industrial hygiene, and only to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene
laws, ordinances, or regulations relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property,
or the regulation or protection of the environment, including ambient air, soil, soil vapor,
groundwater, surface water, or land use.
Hazardous Substances includes without limitation:
(a) Those substances included within the definitions of hazardous substance,
hazardous waste, hazardous material, toxic substance, solid waste, or pollutant or contaminant in
CERCLA, RCRA, TSCA, HMTA, or under any other Environmental Law;
(b) Those substances listed in the United States Department of Transportation (DOT)
Table [49 CFR 172.101], or by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or any successor
agency, as hazardous substances [40 CFR Part 302];
(c) Other substances, materials, and wastes that are or become regulated or classified
as hazardous or toxic under federal, state, or local laws or regulations; and
Page 192
2
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
(d) Any material, waste, or substance that is
(i)a petroleum or refined petroleum product,
(ii) asbestos,
(iii) polychlorinated biphenyl,
(iv) designated as a hazardous substance pursuant to 33 USCS § 1321 or listed
pursuant to 33 USCS § 1317,
(v) a flammable explosive, or
(vi) a radioactive material.
Page 193
1
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
EXHIBIT F
FORM OF RIGHT OF ENTRY AND ACCESS AGREEMENT
RIGHT OF ENTRY AND ACCESS AGREEMENT
THIS RIGHT OF ENTRY AND ACCESS AGREEMENT (herein called this “Agreement”) is
made and entered into as of _________, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (herein called “Grantor”), and REZA
AFZALI (herein called “Grantee”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of the fee simple interest in the real property located at
8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Redhill Country Club Drive, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, over which Grantee seeks to acquire a fee simple interest over a portion of the real
property, more particularly described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference (herein called the “Property”);
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee contemplate entering into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement and Escrow Instructions related to the Property (the “Purchase Agreement”);
WHEREAS, Grantee has requested the right of entry upon and access to the Property for
the purpose of undertaking tests, inspections and other due diligence activities (herein called the
“Due Diligence Activities”) in connection with the proposed acquisition by Grantee of the
Property under the Purchase Agreement;
WHEREAS, Grantor has agreed to grant to Grantee, and Grantee has agreed to accept
from Grantor, a non-exclusive, revocable license to enter upon the Property to perform the Due
Diligence Activities in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee desire to execute and enter into this Agreement for the
purpose of setting forth their agreement with respect to the Due Diligence Activities and
Grantee’s entry upon the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee do hereby
covenant and agree as follows:
1. Access by Grantee.
(a) Subject to Grantee’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, until the earlier to occur of (i) the Close of Escrow, (may be inconsistent with the 45
days in the agreement) or (ii) the earlier termination of this Agreement, Grantee and Grantee’s
agents, employees, contractors, representatives and other designees (herein collectively called
Page 194
2
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
“Grantee’s Designees”) shall have the right to enter upon the Property for the purpose of
conducting the Due Diligence Activities.
(b) Grantee expressly agrees as follows: (i) any activities by or on behalf of
Grantee, including, without limitation, the entry by Grantee or Grantee’s Designees onto the
Property in connection with the Due Diligence Activities shall not damage the Property in any
manner whatsoever or disturb or interfere with the rights or possession of any tenant on the
Property, (ii) in the event the Property is altered or disturbed in any manner in connection with
the Due Diligence Activities, Grantee shall immediately return the Property to the condition
existing prior to the Due Diligence Activities, and (iii) Grantee, to the maximum extent allowed
by law, shall indemnify, defend and hold Grantor harmless from and against any and all claims,
liabilities, damages, losses, costs and expenses of any kind or nature whatsoever (including,
without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses and court costs) suffered, incurred or sustained
by Grantor as a result of, by reason of, or in connection with the Due Diligence Activities or the
entry by Grantee or Grantee’s Designees onto the Property. Notwithstanding any provision of
this Agreement to the contrary, Grantee shall not have the right to undertake any invasive
activities or tests upon the Property, or any environmental testing on the Property beyond the
scope of a standard “Phase I” investigation, without the prior written consent of Grantor of a
workplan for such “Phase II” or invasive testing, which may be granted, denied or conditioned in
Seller’s sole and absolute discretion. If Grantor does not respond or reject any workplan within
five (5) business days of Grantee’s delivery of the written workplan proposal to Grantor pursuant
to the notice provisions of this Agreement, then Grantor shall be deemed to have not approved
the submitted workplan and Grantee may proceed with such testing. If Grantor rejects such
proposed workplan in whole or in part, then this Agreement shall become null and void at the
sole option of Grantee. If Grantee terminates this Agreement under the foregoing provision, then
neither party shall have any further rights, duties and obligations.
2. Lien Waivers. Upon receipt of a written request from Grantor, Grantee will
provide Grantor with lien waivers following completion of the Due Diligence Activities from
each and every contractor, materialman, engineer, architect and surveyor who might have lien
rights, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Grantor and its counsel. To the extent
permitted by applicable law, Grantee hereby indemnifies Grantor from and against any claims or
demands for payment, or any liens or lien claims made against Grantor or the Property as a result
of the Due Diligence Activities.
3. Insurance. Prior to entry onto the Property, Grantee shall, and shall cause all of
Grantee’s Designees performing the Due Diligence Activities to, procure or maintain a policy of
commercial general liability insurance issued by an insurer reasonably satisfactory to Grantor
covering each of the Due Diligence Activities with a single limit of liability (per occurrence and
aggregate) of not less than $1,000,000.00, and to deliver to Grantor a certificate of insurance and
copy of additional insured endorsement naming Seller as named additional insured, evidencing
that such insurance is in force and effect, and evidencing that Grantor has been named as an
additional insured thereunder with respect to the Due Diligence Activities. Such insurance shall
be maintained in force throughout the term of this Agreement.
Page 195
3
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
4. Successors. To the extent any rights or obligations under this Agreement remain
in effect, this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against, and shall inure to the
benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and
permitted assigns.
5. Limitations. Grantor does not hereby convey to Grantee any right, title or interest
in or to the Property, but merely grants the specific rights and privileges hereinabove set forth.
6. Notices. Whenever any notice, demand, or request is required or permitted under
this Agreement, such notice, demand, or request shall be in writing and shall be delivered by
hand, be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or shall be
sent by nationally recognized commercial courier for next business day delivery, to the addresses
set forth below the respective executions of the parties hereof, or to such other addresses as are
specified by written notice given in accordance herewith, or shall be transmitted by facsimile to
the number for each party set forth below their respective executions hereof, or to such other
numbers as are specified by written notice given in accordance herewith. All notices, demands,
or requests delivered by hand shall be deemed given upon the date so delivered; those given by
mailing as hereinabove provided shall be deemed given on the date of deposit in the United
States Mail; those given by commercial courier as hereinabove provided shall be deemed given
on the date of deposit with the commercial courier; and those given by facsimile shall be deemed
given on the date of facsimile transmittal. Nonetheless, the time period, if any, in which a
response to any notice, demand, or request must be given and shall commence to run from the
date of receipt of the notice, demand, or request by the addressee thereof. Any notice, demand,
or request not received because of changed address or facsimile number of which no notice was
given as hereinabove provided or because of refusal to accept delivery shall be deemed received
by the party to whom addressed on the date of hand delivery, on the date of facsimile transmittal,
on the first calendar day after deposit with commercial courier, or on the third calendar day
following deposit in the United States Mail, as the case may be.
7. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Grantee.
8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed, enforced and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
9. Termination. This Agreement can be terminated by Grantor at any time and for
any reason, or no reason, upon written notice from Grantor to Grantee.
10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, and all of such counterparts together shall constitute one and
the same instrument.
11. No Recording of Agreement or Memorandum of Agreement. In no event shall
this Agreement or any memorandum hereof be recorded in the Official Records of San
Bernardino County, California, and any such recordation or attempted recordation shall
constitute a breach of this Agreement by the party responsible for such recordation or attempted
recordation.
Page 196
4
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have caused this Agreement to be
executed and sealed, on the day and year first written above.
GRANTOR: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation
By:
Name: John Gillison
Title: City Manager
Attest:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Address for notices: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attn: Jason Welday
Phone: (909) 477-2700
email: Jason.Welday@cityofrc.us
Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attn.: Regina N. Danner, Esq.
Phone: (213) 626-8484
Fax: (213) 626-0078
email: rdanner@rwglaw.com
Page 197
5
11231-0001\2564587v1.doc
GRANTEE: REZA AFZALI
REZA AFZALI
Address for notices: Reza Afzali
8530 Mulholland Drive
Los Angeles, California 90046
Phone: (310) 877-5428
email: rafzali922@gmail.com
Page 198
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 10 OF TRACT NO. 2521 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS, WHICH WAS VACATED BY THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. 83-
130 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-225182, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 20
FEET WIDE, LYING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE
NORTH 59°25’30” WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 42.44 FEET TO
A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES) SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE SOUTH 89°47’47” EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.80
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 451.56 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 18.19 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°18’28”; THENCE SOUTH 30°12’29” EAST, 30.87 FEET TO A POINT ON
A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 507.49 FEET (A
RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 52°02’28” WEST);
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 68.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 07°41’11”; THENCE SOUTH 30°37’55” WEST, 50.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°04’23” WEST,
7.37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH
30°34’30” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 123.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 1,094
SQUARE FEET.
SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, OFFERS OF
DEDICATION, RIGHTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD, IF ANY
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED,
CHECKED AND APPROVED BY:
OCTOBER 7, 2021
JACK C. LEE DATE
P.L.S. NO. 8407
REGISTRATION EXPIRES:
06/30/2022
RIGHT OF ENTRY
Page 199
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION NPOR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022
RIGHT OF ENTRY
Page 200
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITIONNEXHIBIT "B"
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
POR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022
RIGHT OF ENTRY
Page 201
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No.
DRC2018-00912, Located on the North Side of 9th Street, West of
Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 9th Street, Submitted by 9th & Vineyard, LLC.
(CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Improvement Agreement Extension for Case
No. DRC2018-00912 located on the north side of 9th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768
9th Street.
BACKGROUND:
On January 22, 2020, Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2018-00912 for the
development of three industrial/warehouse buildings totaling 236,534 square feet within the
General Industrial (GI) District, located on the north side of 9th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue,
at 8768 9th Street.
On November 4, 2020, City Council approved an Improvement Agreement and associated
securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvments in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond No. PB00573800106 $136,300
Labor and Material Bond No. PB00573800106 $136,300
ANALYSIS:
The developer, 9th & Vineyard, LLC has submitted a request for a 12 month extension to the
Improvement Agreement. Completion of the public improvements has been delayed due to a
substantial delay from Southern California Edison completing their plans and pricing to
underground existing power lines.
If approved, the Improvement Agreement would be extended to October 20, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 202
ATTACHMENT 1
1
7
4
8
DRC2018-00912
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 203
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in an Amount of
$1,718,302, Plus 10% Contingency for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Local
Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Local Overlay Pavement
Rehabilitation (Project);
2. Accept the bids received for the Project;
3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $1,718,302 to the lowest
responsive bidder, Gentry Brother’s, Inc, for the total Bid;
4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $171,830;
5. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $39,600 to Onward Engineering, Inc. for on-
call construction inspection services; and
6. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $29,868 to Ninyo and Moore, Inc. for on-call
materials testing services.
7. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $45,000 to Westland Group, Inc. for on-call
Construction Monumentation Survey Services.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses asphalt overlay as a paving method to apply a new layer of
asphalt to deteriorating roadway surfaces. Instead of demolishing the old asphalt surface
completely, asphalt overlay project will use the existing layers as a base for the new asphalt
pavement. An asphalt overlay project extends the life of the pavement an additional 8 to 15 years.
Engineering staff used its Pavement Management System (PMS) to determine the list of
neighborhood streets to be resurfaced. PMS is a planning tool that analyzes existing pavement
conditions and identifies good, fair, poor conditions. A vicinity map illustrating the various locations
for asphalt overlay is included as Attachment 1.
The scope of work consists of weed kill, routing and crack sealing, asphalt concrete overlay,
adjusting existing manholes and valves to new grade, restriping and installation of pavement
markings. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction.
ANALYSIS:
The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published
in the Daily Bulletin on September 7, and 14, 2021. The City Clerk’s Office facilitated the formal
solicitation for bidding the project.
Page 204
Page 2
9
7
7
On September 21, 2021, the City Clerk office received seven (7) construction bids. The Engineer’s
estimate for the project was $2,070,000. The apparent low bidder Gentry Brother’s, Inc. submitted
a bid in the amount of $1,718,301.84. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2.
The Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in
accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has
completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder Gentry
Brother’s meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 “Existing
Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:
Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $1,718,302
Construction Contract Contingency (10%)$171,830
Construction Inspection Services $39,600
Construction Materials Services $29,868
Construction Monumentation Survey Services $45,000
Bid Noticing Advertisement $2,000
Estimated Construction Costs $2,006,600
A total of $1,820,000 has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021/22 from the State Gas Tax R&T7360
Fund (Fund 174), for FY 2021/22 local overlay projects. In addition, $250,000 has been budgeted
from the Measure I fund (Fund 177) for ADA Access Ramps at Various Locations and a portion
of this amount will be used to cover all modifications of existing curb ramps along the project
limits. A total amount of $2,070,000 is available for the local asphalt overlay project. Total funds
for this project are identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No.'s in the amounts
listed below:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
11743035650/1022174-0 Gas Tax R&T7360
Fund (174)
Local Street Rehab $1,820,000
11773035650/1150177-0 Measure I Fund
(177)
ADA Ramps $186,600
Total Project Funding $2,006,600
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 - Bid Summary
Page 205
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2021-02
FY 2021/22 LOCAL OVERLAY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 206
UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1 1 LS Mobilization $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 $25,125.37 $25,125.37 $52,663.12 $52,663.12
2 1 LS Clearing, Grubbing, and Removal - Including Disposal $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $38,548.22 $38,548.22 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $69,000.00 $69,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $61,000.00 $61,000.00 $42,383.50 $42,383.50
3 9,511
TN
Asphalt Concrete Overlay (Including Pavement Preparation) Per Details $85.00 $808,435.00 $71.00 $675,281.00 $88.00 $836,968.00 $74.74 $710,852.14 $73.00 $694,303.00 $82.00 $779,902.00 $84.00 $798,924.00 $98.72 $938,925.92
4 20 CY Class 2 Miscellaneous Base at SD Easement Per Detail $60.00 $1,200.00 $45.00 $900.00 $300.00 $6,000.00 $350.00 $7,000.00 $175.00 $3,500.00 $325.00 $6,500.00 $105.00 $2,100.00 $113.41 $2,268.20
5 625
LF Sawcut and Smooth Out the Edge of Existing Gutter at SD Easement
(EB Only) Per Detail $10.00 $6,250.00 $11.00 $6,875.00 $17.00 $10,625.00 $5.00 $3,125.00 $5.00 $3,125.00 $16.00 $10,000.00 $17.00 $10,625.00 $27.68 $17,300.00
6 43549 SY Variable Pavement Edge Cold Plane (0'-0.1') Per Details $2.00 $87,098.00 $1.75 $76,210.75 $0.80 $34,839.20 $1.37 $59,662.13 $1.00 $43,549.00 $2.20 $95,807.80 $1.25 $54,436.25 $2.27 $98,856.23
7 2184 SY Variable Pavement Edge Cold Plane (0'-0.125') Per Details $2.50 $5,460.00 $2.40 $5,241.60 $6.50 $14,196.00 $2.00 $4,368.00 $1.40 $3,057.60 $4.00 $8,736.00 $1.42 $3,101.28 $2.29 $5,001.36
8 41871 SY Variable Pavement Edge Cold Plane (0'-0.2') Per Details $4.00 $167,484.00 $2.00 $83,742.00 $0.80 $33,496.80 $1.69 $70,761.99 $2.25 $94,209.75 $2.25 $94,209.75 $2.74 $114,726.54 $2.30 $96,303.30
9 28631 SF Grind and Patch 0.12' AC Per Detail $2.00 $57,262.00 $2.00 $57,262.00 $2.10 $60,125.10 $2.20 $62,988.20 $1.25 $35,788.75 $1.30 $37,220.30 $2.76 $79,021.56 $1.95 $55,830.45
10 26249 SF Construct PCC Access Ramp Per Plans and Specifications $12.00 $314,988.00 $7.00 $183,743.00 $11.50 $301,863.50 $9.00 $236,241.00 $11.00 $288,739.00 $10.00 $262,490.00 $11.00 $288,739.00 $6.99 $183,480.51
11 1050
SF Install Truncated Detectable Warning Surfaces Per Plans and
Specifications $50.00 $52,500.00 $22.00 $23,100.00 $24.00 $25,200.00 $42.00 $44,100.00 $50.00 $52,500.00 $38.00 $39,900.00 $35.00 $36,750.00 $68.05 $71,452.50
12 2943
LF Sawcut, Remove, and Replace PCC Curb and Gutter Per Plans and
Details $50.00 $147,150.00 $55.00 $161,865.00 $47.00 $138,321.00 $48.00 $141,264.00 $63.00 $185,409.00 $67.00 $197,181.00 $66.00 $194,238.00 $51.08 $150,328.44
13 958 SF Sawcut, Remove, and Replace PCC Sidewalk Per Plans and Details $10.00 $9,580.00 $9.00 $8,622.00 $8.70 $8,334.60 $9.00 $8,622.00 $12.00 $11,496.00 $8.50 $8,143.00 $12.00 $11,496.00 $23.25 $22,273.50
14 10778 SF Sawcut, Remove, and Replace PCC Spandrel Per Plans and Details $12.00 $129,336.00 $12.00 $129,336.00 $19.30 $208,015.40 $18.81 $202,734.18 $20.00 $215,560.00 $30.00 $323,340.00 $22.00 $237,116.00 $25.89 $279,042.42
15 1325
LF Sawcut, Remove, and Replace PCC Retaining Curb for Access Ramp Per
Plans and Details $40.00 $53,000.00 $20.00 $26,500.00 $29.00 $38,425.00 $37.00 $49,025.00 $26.00 $34,450.00 $27.00 $35,775.00 $49.00 $64,925.00 $78.21 $103,628.25
16 23 LF Install 12"-18" PCC Retaining Curb at SD Easement Per Detail $100.00 $2,300.00 $45.00 $1,035.00 $72.00 $1,656.00 $100.00 $2,300.00 $25.00 $575.00 $50.00 $1,150.00 $210.00 $4,830.00 $298.21 $6,858.83
17 114
EA
Adjust Manhole Cover with Frame (Storm Drain, Sewer, Etc.) to Grade $500.00 $57,000.00 $600.00 $68,400.00 $517.00 $58,938.00 $550.00 $62,700.00 $480.00 $54,720.00 $575.00 $65,550.00 $546.00 $62,244.00 $562.45 $64,119.30
18 74 EA Adjust Water Valve and Gas Valve Cover to Grade $200.00 $14,800.00 $110.00 $8,140.00 $340.00 $25,160.00 $100.00 $7,400.00 $450.00 $33,300.00 $150.00 $11,100.00 $288.00 $21,312.00 $378.57 $28,014.18
19 58
EA
Adjust Water Valve and Sewer Clean Out Cover with Frame to Grade $500.00 $29,000.00 $110.00 $6,380.00 $340.00 $19,720.00 $550.00 $31,900.00 $600.00 $34,800.00 $575.00 $33,350.00 $535.00 $31,030.00 $547.30 $31,743.40
20 14
EA Adjust Water Meter with Frame to Grade (CVWD Will Supply New Box If
Damaged)$400.00 $5,600.00 $150.00 $2,100.00 $340.00 $4,760.00 $400.00 $5,600.00 $900.00 $12,600.00 $300.00 $4,200.00 $840.00 $11,760.00 $395.69 $5,539.66
21 1
LS Traffic Striping, Signage, Markings, and Markers Per City STD Plan. No.
103, 133, 401-B (All Legends, Symbols, Limit Lines, and Crosswalks
Shall Be Thermoplastic)
$15,000.00 $15,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $19,356.36 $19,356.36 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $13,922.73 $13,922.73
22 1 LS Traffic Control $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $58,020.27 $58,020.27 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 $99,000.00 $99,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $172,000.00 $172,000.00 $55,768.43 $55,768.43
TOTAL BID AMOUNT:$2,068,443.00 $1,718,301.84 $1,983,643.60 $1,991,000.00 $1,998,682.10 $2,119,554.85 $2,299,000.00 $2,325,704.23
7
LC Paving & Sealing, Inc.
6
Hardy & Harper, Inc.Gentry Brothers Inc.All American Asphalt Onyx Paving Company, Inc.
4
Sequel Contactors, Inc.
52
R.J. Noble Company
BASE BID
3`
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEFY21-22 LOCAL OVERLAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS
APPARENT LOW BIDDER
Bid Date: September 21, 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 207
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with Doug Martin Contracting Co. Inc. in the
amount of $127,496 plus 10% Contingency, for the Fiscal Year 2021/22
Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal
Pavement Rehabilitation Project on file with the City Engineer (Project);
2. Accept the bids received for the Project;
3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $127,496; to the lowest
responsive bidder Dough Martin, for the total bid;
4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount $12,750;
5. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount $33,958 to Aufbau Corporation for on-call
construction inspection services; and
6. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $17,790 to Ninyo and Moore for on-call
materials testing services.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses a method known as slurry seal to restore existing asphalt
pavement comprised of minor cracks throughout the roadway. Slurry seal is the application of a
mixture of water, asphalt emulsion, aggregate and additives to an existing asphalt pavement
surface. Slurry seal provides a new wear surface over existing asphalt pavement reducing the
need for costly repairs. A typical life expectancy for slurry seal is estimated between five and eight
years.
Engineering staff used its Pavement Management System (PMS) to determine the list of
neighborhood streets to be resurfaced. PMS is a planning tool that analyzes existing pavement
conditions and identifies good, fair, and poor conditions. A vicinity map illustrating the various
neighborhood streets scheduled this fiscal year for slurry seal is included as Attachment 1.
Page 208
Page 2
9
9
1
ANALYSIS:
The scope of work to be performed consists of weed kill, routing and crack sealing, application of
slurry seal, protecting existing manholes and valves, restriping and installation of pavement
markings. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction
project.
The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published
in the Daily Bulletin on September 21 and September 28, 2021. The City Clerk’s Office facilitated
the formal solicitation for bidding the project. On October 5, 2020, the City Clerk office received
five (5) construction bids. The Engineer’s estimate for the project was $196,750. The apparent
low bidder Doug Martin Contracting, Co. Inc. submitted a bid in the amount of $127,496. A full bid
summary is included as Attachment 2.
Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance
with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the
required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder Doug Martin
Contracting Co. Inc., meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 “Existing
Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:
A total of $280,000 has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021/22 from the Gas Tax R&T7360 (Fund
174), for local slurry seal street resurfacing projects. Funding for this project continues to be
available under the Capital Improvement Project Account No. in the amount listed below.
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
11743035650/1022174-0 Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (174)Local Street Rehab $193,912
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 - Bid Summary
Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $127,496
Construction Contract Contingency (10%)$12,750
Construction Inspection Services $33,958
Construction Materials Testing $17,790
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,918
Estimated Construction Costs $193,912
Page 209
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2021-07
FY 2021/22 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 210
UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1 1 LS Mobilization $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $22,889.78 $22,889.78 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
2 61,700 SY Slurry Seal Type II, Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (EAS) With Latex
Including Routing And Crack Sealing, Protection Of Existing Survey
Monuments, Manholes, Valve Covers ETC Per Details
$2.50 $154,250.00 $1.79 $110,443.00 $1.35 $83,295.00 $1.69 $104,273.00 $1.98 $122,166.00 $2.54 $156,718.00
3 1 LS Replacement of Striping, Thermoplastic, Pavement Markings and
Markers (Note: All Legends, symbols, Limit Lines and Crosswalks shall
be Thermoplastic
$18,000.00 $18,000.00 $9,053.00 $9,053.00 $9,200.00 $9,200.00 $10,592.73 $10,592.73 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $7,722.00 $7,722.00
4 1 LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $16,890.18 $16,890.18 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $8,160.00 $8,160.00
TOTAL BID AMOUNT:$193,750.00 $127,496.00 $134,995.00 $154,645.69 $159,666.00 $182,600.00
4
Pavement Coatings Co.
5
BID DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2021
3`
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEFY21-22 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS
APPARENT LOW BIDDER
Doug Martin Contractin
Company, Inc.American Asphalt South, Inc.All American Ashpalt
2
Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 211
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Accela, Inc. for
Maintenance, Support and Cloud Hosting Services in the Amount Not to
Exceed $1,256,328 Over Five Years. (CITY/ FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff reccomends the City Council approve a five-year agreement with Accela, Inc. for
annual maintenance, support, and cloud hosting services of the City's land management
software in the total amount of $1,142,117, with costs shared between the City and the
Fire District in the amounts of $856,587 from the City General Fund and $285,530 from
the Fire District Fund. Staff is also requesting Council approve a contingency 10%
spending allowance of $114,211 for a total not-to-exceed spending authority of
$1,256,328 for the life of the agreement.
BACKGROUND:
Accela a cloud-hosted land management, permitting and record keeping platform used
for development and construction projects as well as follow up inspection reports from
across disciplines. This platform, which is hosted in Microsoft Azure Cloud for
Government, uses an open architecture and a centralized database, allowing information
to be shared across departments, improving communication between City staff, business
partners, and residents. The system provides process management and record storage
for the Planning, Building and Safety, Engineering, and Fire Department.
In 2012 the decision was made to implement Accela as a fully cloud-hosted platform-as-
a-service (PaaS), reducing the demand for physical hardware in the City’s data center
and providing automated cloud updates and security patching for both the Accela
application and the hosting servers.
At the conclusion of the initial five-year lease, the City entered into the current four-year
maintenance, support and cloud hosting agreement with Accela, Inc. in June 2018 which
expires December 20, 2021.
Page 212
Page 2
9
9
6
ANALYSIS:
The City utilizes the platform as a service (PaaS) model for Accela, which requires annual
maintenance, support, and cloud-hosting services to continue using the platform.
At the end of every contract cycle, DoIT negotiates best-and-final pricing terms for a multi-
year agreement generally covering 3-5 years. In the case of the proposed agreement
beginning in 2021, Accela capped the annual cost escalation to 5% under a five-year
agreement. The graduated annualized pricing of the negotiated terms allows the City to
gradually absorb inflationary costs while maintaining the performance and integrity of the
platform. Staff recommends continuing to share costs with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District at a rate of 25% of the total hosting, maintenance, and support of
Accela.
The upcoming five-year proposal contains the following pricing and pro-rata cost sharing
projections:
City RCFD
Term Start Annual Cost Share 75%Share 25%
Year 1 12/20/2021 $ 215,122.80 $ 161,342.10 $ 53,780.70
Year 2 12/20/2022 $ 221,576.48 $ 166,182.36 $ 55,394.12
Year 3 12/20/2023 $ 228,223.78 $ 171,167.84 $ 57,055.95
Year 4 12/20/2024 $ 235,070.49 $ 176,302.87 $ 58,767.62
Year 5 12/20/2025 $ 242,122.61 $ 181,591.96 $ 60,530.65
Total $ 1,142,116.16 $ 856,587.12 $ 285,529.04
Copies of the agreement are on file with the City Clerk's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost to the City over the life of the four-year agreement is $1,142,117, which
includes all hosting, support, and maintenance costs associated with the Accela land
management platform. Any contingency expenditures will be appropriated as needed in
accordance with the City’s budget processes.
The City and Fire District have historically budgeted for their respective shares of Accela
maintenance costs using DoIT Account No. 1001209-5300 (Contract Services) and Fire
District Account No. 3281501-5300 (Contract Services). Sufficient funds are available in
the current Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget to cover the first year of the proposed service
agreement.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Entering into a five-year agreement with pre-negotiated pricing supports Council's goals
for mid-range and long-term planning by creating a fixed cost structure for future budget
planning.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 213
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Change Order 001 to Public Works Contract
No. 2021-049 with Southern California Sound Image for the Council
Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the final base estimate for Change Order 001 to
Public Works Contract No. 2021-049 with Southern California Sound Image to complete the A/V
refresh of the City Council Chambers in the total amount not to exceed $331,800.
BACKGROUND:
The audio and visual equipment in the Council Chambers supporting the broadcast of City Council
meetings to the public was last updated in 2015. Within the past two years components of the
Council Chambers equipment have reached the end of their projected service life and have begun
to fail unexpectedly, causing intermittent service disruptions during meetings and special events.
In May 2021, Council awarded Contract No. 2021-049 to Southern California Sound Image for
the Central Park Audio-Visual update project to complete a comprehensive A/V refresh of the
Community Rooms at the David Drier Senior Center and Goldy Lewis Community Center. Council
also approved staff to move forward with Change Order 001 to complete a similar update to the
technology equipment required to manage and broadcast City Council meetings over our local
television provider’s government access channel.
ANALYSIS:
Auerbach Pollock Friedlander completed the specific design plans for the Council Chambers in
September 2021 which was used to develop a project estimate from Southern California Sound
Image. The final base estimate provided by Southern California Sound Image is $192,000 to
complete the scope of work as provided by Auerbach Pollock Friedlander. Additionally, staff has
identified legacy network equipment supporting the audio-visual technology that is also in need
of replacement in the amount of $47,096. Staff is additionally recommending a 20% contingency
of $60,904.
Since the original approval from Council in May 2021 there have been a series of supply chain
disruptions and labor market changes that have directly impacted the projected costs of this
project. The increased costs from the initial estimates, as well as the request for contingency
funds, reflect the continued impact of our current supply chain and labor uncertainties.
Page 214
Page 2
9
9
5
This project is scheduled to begin at the conclusion of the Central Park Audio-Visual equipment
updates, with work tentatively scheduled to take place during the holiday closure in December
2021.
All documents related to this project are on file with the City Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT:
For the Council Chambers A/V Refresh project, staff recommends an appropriation in the amount
of $331,800 into account number 1025001-5602 to cover the projected $192,000 in equipment
and service costs from Southern California Sound Image, $47,096 in network improvements, the
contract amendment with Auerbach Pollock Friedlander in the amount of $31,800 to complete
design work for the Council Chambers refresh, and the project contingency amount of
$60,904. The cost of the Council Chambers A/V Refresh project will be reimbursed by PEG funds
into revenue account number 1025000-4911 (Reimbursement from Other Funds).
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The Council Chambers A/V Systems Update projects address the core value of intentionally
embracing and anticipating the future as improvements to our systems exponentially increase the
capabilities of staff to serve our internal and external rental customers.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 215
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Theresa Gates, Management Aide
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $170,681 from the
Citywide Infrastructure fund (Fund 198) and a Transfer from the Trust
Account (Fund 882) in the Amount of $188,292 for the 6th Street Cycle
Track Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $170,681 from the Citywide Infrastructure fund
(Fund 198) to Project Account No. 1198303-5650/2005198-0 for the 6th Street Cycle Track
project and
2) Authorize a transfer of funds in the amount of $188,292 deposited by Lewis Development
for construction of the portion of 6th Street Cycle Track along the frontage of The Resort
from the Trust Account (Fund 882) to the Citywide Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198).
BACKGROUND:
In 2016, SBCTA and the City executed a Cooperative Agreement (SBCTA Contract No. 15-
1001129) for Phase I of the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. The scope of
work consisted of installing bike lanes and bike lockers as well as providing pedestrian and bicycle
access along portions of Milliken Avenue that connect to the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink
Station. Construction for Phase 1 was completed in March 2019. This initial project was funded
through the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 2 Call for Projects.
In 2019, SBCTA was successful in obtaining grant funding as a part of the ATP Cycle 4 Call for
Project, for Phase II of the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project which includes
projects in the cities of Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Rialto, and San
Bernardino. In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Phase II includes constructing a Class IV
protected bike lane (also known as a Cycle Track) along 6th Street from Haven Avenue to
Rochester Avenue.
At the June 3, 2020 Council Meeting, City Council approved a Cooperative Agreement (SBCTA
Contract No. 2020-1002316/City Contract No. CO2020-135) related to the design and
construction of the 6th Street Cycle Track project. A copy of this agreement is on file with the City
Clerk. The Agreement designates SBCTA as the agency responsible for the planning,
environmental, design, right-of-way, and construction phases while the City will provide design
and construction oversight support services related to Phase II of the Project.
Page 216
Page 2
9
8
5
ANALYSIS:
The Cooperative Agreement specifies that 25 percent of the project cost will be attributable to
design and construction oversight support services totaling $341,363 which will be the City's share
in the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in late 2026 or sooner. Funds to cover this
share were anticipated to be budgeted in two separate fiscal years. The first half of the funding in
the amount of $170,690 was budgeted in FY2020/21 and has been paid. The remaining amount
was expected to be billed by the end of FY2020/21, therefore staff included it in the amended
budget. However, based on progress of the project, billing for the second half of the City’s share
did not occur before fiscal year end. Given the anticipated timing of this second invoice, the funds
to cover the payment were not included in the budget for FY2021/22 and thus an appropriation is
needed to make the required payment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As mentioned above, the City's share of the cost for the project is $341,380. The first half of the
funding in the amount of $170,682 was expended as anticipated into the Fiscal Year 2020/21
Budget and the remaining $170,681 needs to be appropriated in Fiscal Year 2021/22 in the
following account:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
1198303-5650/2005198-0 Citywide Infrastructure
Fund (198)
6th St Cycle Track $170,681
Further, a deposit was received from Lewis Development in the amount of $188,292 for
construction of a cycle track along the frontage of The Resort development. These funds were
deposited into Trust Account No. 1882000-4809. Staff is requesting that this deposit be
transferred from the Trust Account to the Citywide Infrastructure (Fund 198) Revenue Account
No. 1198000-4901 to off-set project costs and in line with the intent of the deposit.
Transfer from
Account No.
Transfer To Account
No.
Description Amount
1882000-4809 1198000-4901 6th St Cycle Track $188,292
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City be ensuring the construction of high-
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 217
Foo
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54221 that a Portion of Real Property Owned by the City Located
at 8204 Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill Country Club Drive and
Identified as APN 0207-112-04 & 14 as Exempt Surplus Land and Not
Necessary for the City's Use. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-112) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution declaring pursuant to
Government Code Section 54221 that a portion of real property owned by the City located at 8204
Foothill Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill Country Club Drive and identified as APN 0207-112-04 &
14 as exempt surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use, finding that such declaration is
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, and taking
related actions.
BACKGROUND:
The City is the owner in fee simple of certain real property (“Property”) located at 8204 Foothill
Boulevard and 8211 Red Hill Country Club Drive, approximately 400 feet east of the intersection
of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard. These larger parcels were acquired for use
as planned right-of-way for the future realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive; however,
portions of each parcel have been deemed unnecessary for the future realignment project. The
portions proposed to be deemed exempt surplus land (Property) are described in Exhibit “A” and
shown on Exhibit “B” of the attached resolution. The area of the land to be considered under this
item is approximately 1,094 square feet. A lot line adjustment is being processed to add the
subject land described above to an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS:
Under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-54233 (“Act”), surplus land is
land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular
public meeting declaring the land as surplus and not necessary for the City’s use. The Act
provides that land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the City
may take action to dispose of it consistent with the City’s policies or procedures.
Under the Act, land is necessary for the City’s use if the land is being used or is planned to be
used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council or for City work or operations. The
Act specifies that the City’s use does not include commercial or industrial uses, and land that is
disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of revenue is not necessary for the
Page 218
Page 2
9
5
1
City’s use.
The Property is not currently being used by the City and after evaluation of the Property for
potential use in City work of operations, staff has determined that it is not suitable for the City’s
use and qualifies as exempt surplus land consistent with the Act. As noted above, the subject
land described above is not necessary for the City’s use because it is not necessary for the
realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive and it is not identified for use by the City in another
written plan. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1), “exempt surplus land” includes
land that is less than 5,000 square feet in area that is sold to an owner of contiguous land. The
subject land is less than 5,000 square feet in size and is intended to be sold to a contiguous
landowner, following the approval of the lot line adjustment.
Further, staff has determined that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act per CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it only declares the Property as exempt
surplus land so that it can be conveyed to a contiguous property owner and does not include
development or activity that could have a significant effect on the environment.
Staff recommends that the City Council declare that the Property as exempt surplus land and not
necessary for the City’s use. Following the adoption of the attached resolution the City may
proceed to sell or lease the Property to any entity without further regard to the requirements of
the Act.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Resolution No. 2021-112
Page 219
ATTACHMENT 1
1
7
8
4
Vicinity Map
APN
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
1
4
APN: 0207-112-04Approximate Location of
Proposed Surplus Property
Page 220
Resolution No. 21-XXXX -Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54221 THAT PORTIONS OF THE REAL
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400
FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB
DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IDENTIFIED AS APN 0201-112-04
& APN 0201-112-14 IS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND NOT
NECESSARY FOR THE CITY’S USE, FINDING THAT SUCH
DECLARATION IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND TAKING
RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is the owner in fee simple of
that certain real property described in Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B”, attached
hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, under the Surplus Property Land Act, Government Code Sections
54220-54233 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the
City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus
and not necessary for the City’s use. The land must be declared either surplus land or
exempt surplus land; and
WHEREAS, under the Act, land is necessary for the City’s use if the land is being
used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council, for
City work or operations; and
WHEREAS, the Property is vacant mixed use zoned land and is not currently being
used by the City; and
WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for
City work or operations, including for street purposes; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the City’s
use. The Property was initially acquired as part of larger parcels for use in the Red Hill
County Club Driver realignment project. However, the Property at issue is not necessary
for the realignment project and it is not identified for use by the City in another written
plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare that the Property is exempt surplus
land and not necessary for the City’s use; and
WHEREAS, the accompanying staff report provides supporting information upon
which the declaration and findings set forth in this Resolution are based;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Page 221
Resolution No. 21-XXX -Page 2 of 2
Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of
this Resolution.
Section 2. The City Council hereby declares that the Property is exempt
surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use. The basis for this declaration is that
the surplus land is less than 5,000 square feet in area.
Section 3. This Resolution has been reviewed with respect to the applicability
of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et
seq.) (“CEQA”) for conformance. It is determined that deeming the subject land as surplus
is categorically exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because
this Resolution merely declares the Property as exempt surplus land so that it can be
conveyed to a contiguous property owner. No development or activity that could have a
significant effect on the environment is proposed.
Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15062.
Section 5. The officers and staff of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and
severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the
purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified
and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the
requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of
interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________ 2021.
Page 222
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 10 OF TRACT NO. 2521 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS, WHICH WAS VACATED BY THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. 83-
130 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-225182, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 20
FEET WIDE, LYING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE
NORTH 59°25’30” WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY, 42.44 FEET TO
A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES) SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE SOUTH 89°47’47” EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.80
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 451.56 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 18.19 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°18’28”; THENCE SOUTH 30°12’29” EAST, 30.87 FEET TO A POINT ON
A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 507.49 FEET (A
RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 52°02’28” WEST);
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 68.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 07°41’11”; THENCE SOUTH 30°37’55” WEST, 50.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°04’23” WEST,
7.37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH
30°34’30” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 123.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 1,094
SQUARE FEET.
SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, OFFERS OF
DEDICATION, RIGHTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD, IF ANY
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED,
CHECKED AND APPROVED BY:
OCTOBER 7, 2021
JACK C. LEE DATE
P.L.S. NO. 8407
REGISTRATION EXPIRES:
06/30/2022
Page 223
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITION NPOR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022 Page 224
CITY SURPLUS LAND FOR ACQUISITIONNEXHIBIT "B"
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 3
APN: 0207-112-14
POR. OF LOTS 8 & 9
TRACT NO. 2521
M.B. 36/37-38
PARCEL 1
APN: 0207-112-03 & -20
L
O
T
7
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
2
5
2
1
M.
B
.
3
6
/
3
7
-
3
8
P
A
R
C
E
L
2
A
P
N
:
0
2
0
7
-
1
1
2
-
0
4
Jack C. Lee PLS 8407
OCTOBER 7, 2021
REGISTRATION
EXPIRES: 06/30/2022Page225
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director
Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst
SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Confirming Paying and Reporting the
Value of Employer Paid Member Contribution to CalPERS for the Rancho
Cucamonga Management Association Bargaining Unit. (RESOLUTION
NO. 2021-113). (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution confirming paying and reporting
the value of employer paid member contribution (EPMC) to CalPERS for the Rancho Cucamonga
Management Association (RCMA) bargaining unit.
BACKGROUND:
The City has an existing written labor agreement which specifically provides for the normal
CalPERS member pension contributions to be paid by the employer (the City) and, in accordance
with PELRA, reported as additional compensation. This benefit has applied to all City bargaining
groups.
The City Council previously approved Resolution No. 19-113, modifying paying and reporting the
value of EPMC for the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA), effective June
6, 2020. At that time, the RCCEA bargaining unit included the City’s Mid-Management group.
On March 24, 2021, the Mid-Management group voted to separate from RCCEA, in accordance
with the City’s Employer Employee Relations Resolution, to form their own bargaining unit,
RCMA. As a result, the City Council approved a one-year MOU between the City and RCMA,
effective June 2, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This MOU includes language specific to RCMA,
previously approved by City Council in the RCCEA MOU and Resolution 19-113, establishing
how the City will pay and report the value of EPMC for the mid-management group.
ANALYSIS:
Although specific language establishing how the City will pay and report the value of EPMC has
been incorporated in the RCMA MOU, it must also be adopted by Resolution in accordance with
CalPERS regulations.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution confirming how the City pays
and reports the value of EPMC to CalPERS for the RCMA bargaining unit.
Page 226
Page 2
9
8
8
Upon approval by the City Council, the effective date of this Resolution would be March 24, 2021
to ensure RCMA bargaining unit members are covered from the date RCMA was recognized as
its own bargaining unit through the date the MOU was adopted.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action is to confirm the previously approved EMPC election for RCMA employees and does
not have a fiscal impact for FY 2021-22.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item supports the City Council’s Core Values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the
future and working cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2021-113
Page 227
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
CONFIRMATION OF PAYING AND REPORTING THE VALUE OF
EMPLOYER PAID MEMBER CONTRIBUTION TO CALPERS FOR
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
(RCMA) BARGAINING UNIT.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has the authority to
implement Government Code Section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to Section 20691; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has a written labor
agreement which specifically provides for the normal member contributions to be paid by the
employer, and reported as additional compensation; and
WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to implement Section 20691 is the
adoption by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of a Resolution to commence
paying and reporting the value of said Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has identified the following
conditions for the purpose of its election to pay EPMC:
This benefit shall apply to all miscellaneous employees within the Rancho Cucamonga
Management Association bargaining unit.
This benefit shall consist of paying 3% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting
the same percent (value) of compensation earnable* (excluding Government Code
Section 20636 (c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September
1, 2010 and before July 4, 2011.
This benefit shall consist of paying 2% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting
the same percent (value) of compensation earnable* (excluding Government Code
Section 20636 (c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4,
2011.
The effective date of this Resolution shall be March 24, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California elects to pay and report the value of EPMC, as set forth above.
* Note: Payment of EPMC and reporting the value of EPMC on compensation earnable is on pay rate and
special compensation except special compensation delineated in Government Code Section
20636(c)(4) which is the monetary value of EPMC on compensation earnable.
PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October 2021.
Page 228
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026 and a Resolution
Adopting the Amended Measure “I” Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-114 &
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-115) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions:
1) Approving the Local Measure “I” Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan covering Fiscal
Years 2021/2026 and adopting the attached Measure “I” Capital Improvement Plan
Expenditure Strategy.
2) Approving the amended Local Measure “I” Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan covering
Fiscal Years 2020/2025 as requested by the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure “I”
Funds.
BACKGROUND:
Measure “I”, the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction
receiving revenues from the program annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan which
outlines the specific projects and anticipated costs for which Measure “I” funds will be used. In
addition to adopting the Plan, the City is required by San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) Policy No.40003 (amended May 6, 2015) to annually acknowledge the
requirement to meet the minimum General Fund Maintenance of Effort (MOE) level approved by
both the City Council and SBCTA Board in February and March 2016 respectively. The required
MOE level for Fiscal Year 2021/22 is $2,225,757.
In addition to the adoption of the annual Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, each local
jurisdiction is required to amend the program to adjust for changes as they become apparent.
Staff was notified by SBCTA in early September that the City had not submitted its Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan for the current fiscal year and that disbursement of Measure I funds
would be placed on hold until the submittal was made. While addressing this notification, staff
also noted that the amended program for Fiscal Year 2020/21 had not been completed. Failure
to submit these program resolutions to SBCTA may result in an audit finding.
Page 229
Page 2
9
9
4
ANALYSIS:
Staff has prepared the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for consideration by the City Council.
Upon adoption, the plan will be kept on file with the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) for informational purposes. The Plan includes pavement rehabilitation of Fifth
Street from Lucas Ranch Road to Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Avenue along various stretches,
and Rochester Avenue from Sixth Street to Arrow Route, as well as design for Banyan from
Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue, along with contract services for concrete, striping and
signal maintenance in Fiscal Year 2021/22. In addition to the required resolution, the City is
required to adopt the attached Measure "I" Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy. This
strategy is a narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure “I” Funds
are to be used for and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of project.
The Plan has been “over-programmed” to ensure that the adopted plan contains ample projects
for Measure "I" expenditures. In addition, no more than 50% of the estimated annual program
revenue is programmed for categorical expenditures or general program categories as required
by SBCTA policy. A general program category is a program of work without any identified streets/
locations such as traffic signal maintenance.
In addition to the FY2021/26 Plan, staff has also prepared the amended Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2020/21 for consideration by the City Council for adoption and
to be kept on file with the SBCTA for informational purposes. This amendment captures projects
that have been added throughout the year and accounts for estimated actual expenditures.
Upon adoption of these resolutions, staff will submit both resolutions and program documents to
SBCTA. This will allow for the hold placed on disbursement of Measure I funds to be lifted,
including the single monthly payment from September 2021. Further, it is staff’s intent with this
item to proactively address any audit findings on this matter. Staff has also put measures in place
to ensure that the program resolutions are submitted in a timely manner in future years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of these items will meet SBTCA Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE, and
Expenditure Strategy requirements allowing the City to continue receiving Measure “I” funding.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution to Adopt the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2021/2026
Attachment 2 – Resolution to Amend the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025
Page 230
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE
MEASU RE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN FOR FY2021/2022 THROUGH FY2025/2026
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in
November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to
impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the
incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation
improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set
forth in Ordinance No. 04-01 of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for
revenue from the Local Street Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code 190300 and Ordinance No. 04-01
require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportation -
related construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort
base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan,
which for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $2,225,757.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HERBY RESOLVES, that the Measure I Five-
Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby
adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October 2021.
_____________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1Page231
Measure I Local Pass-through Program
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Fiscal Years 2021/2022 thru 2025/2026
Named Projects:
Is Project in
City's
Non-motorized
Transportation
Plan?
(Yes/No)
Does Project
have an ATP
Component?
(Yes/No)
Is the Project on the
City's Nexus Study
List?
(Public/DIF Share %)
Estimated Total
Project Cost
FY2021/22 Est. Revenue FY2022/23 Est. Revenue FY2023/24 Est. Revenue FY2024/25 Est. Revenue FY2025/26 Est. Revenue Total Est. Rev.
$3,570,297.00 $3,710,666.00 $3,817,874.00 $3,928,143.00 $4,041,559.00 $19,068,539.00
Carryover
Funds
Current
Estimate
Carryover
Funds
Current
Estimate
Carryover
Funds
Current
Estimate
Carryover
Funds
Current
Estimate
Carryover
Funds
Current
Estimate Total
5th Street: Lucas Ranch Road to Hermosa Avenue -
Pavement Rehabilitation No No 0%100%$67,500.00 0.00 67,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $67,500.00
Archibald Avenue: 210 Freeway to 19th Street -
Pavement Rehabilitation No No 0%100%$101,250.00 0.00 101,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $101,250.00
Banyan St from Milliken Ave to Rochester Ave -
Pavement Rehabilitation Yes No 0%100%$580,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 520,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $580,000.00
Etiwanda Avenue: Foothill to Wilson Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation Yes No 0%100%$2,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 2,450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $2,550,000.00
Hermosa Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation No No 0%100%$101,250.00 0.00 101,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $101,250.00
Rochester Ave from 6th St to Arrow Rte - Pavement
Rehabilitation Yes No 0%100%$700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $700,000.00
Named Projects Total:$0.00 $1,110,000.00 $0.00 $620,000.00 $0.00 $2,450,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $4,180,000.00
Total Carryover + Estimate:$1,110,000.00 $620,000.00 $2,450,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
(%) Named Projects to FY Est. Revenue:31.09%16.7%64.17%0.00%0.00%
Categorical Projects:
ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide No No $250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $250,000.00
Concrete Contract Services - Maintenance City Wide No No $500,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $500,000.00
Pavement Management - Evaluate Pavement Condition
City Wide No No $325,000.00 25,000.00 125,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 125,000.00 $325,000.00
Signal Contract Services - Maintenance City Wide No No $3,930,000.00 878,910.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 $3,958,910.00
Striping Contract Services - Maintenance City Wide No No $750,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 $750,000.00
Categorical Projects Total:$1,511,160.00 $1,252,250.00 $1,152,250.00 $1,152,250.00 $1,252,250.00 $6,320,160.00
(%) Categorical Projects to FY Est. Revenue:42.33%33.74%27.55%26.78%30.98%
Resolution Number:2021-XXX
Resolution Approval Date:10/20/21
Contact Person/Title:
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of
Engineering Services
Phone:(909)774-2046
Email:justine.garcia@cityofrc.us
Total Carryover Programming:$0.00
Total Estimated Programming:$10,500,160.00
Total Programming:$10,500,160.00
Rancho Cucamonga
6/30/21 Carryover Balance:$4,390,489.75
Total Programming is currently 44.76% (must not exceed 150%) of Carryover Balance + Total Est. Revenue.
Generated on: 9/27/2021Page 1 of 1Rancho Cucamonga
Add Named Project:
Rochester: BaseLine-Banyan Rehab FY2021/22 Current Estimate = $80,000 Total = $80,000
Add Categorical Project:
Fiber Leasing Major TS Repair FY2021/22 Current Estimate = $30,000 FY22/21, 23/24, 24/25, 25/26 = $30,000 Total = $150,000 FY2021/22 Current Estimate = $77,250 FY22/21, 23/24, 24/25, 25/26 = $77,250 Total = $386,250
Highlighted numbers are updated and include the added projects listed below.
EXHIBIT A
Page 232
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EXPENDITURE STRATEGY
Fiscal Year 2021/2022 thru 2025/2026
Each jurisdiction shall adopt a Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy
as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adoption. The Expenditure Strategy is
not intended to be a narrative description of the projects listed in the Capital
Improvement Plan. Instead, the Expenditure Strategy should provide the policy
approach adopted by the Council for the expenditure of Measure I funds. The
jurisdictional Expenditure Strategy provides an opportunity to document circumstances
or analyses which are not otherwise apparent when reviewing the Measure I Capital
Improvement Plan.
You must include the strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan
adopted by your governing body.
The Measure I Captal Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for the
expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City’s General Plan Circulation
Element as basis.
The City currently has a carryover balance of $4,390,489 million in the Measure I
Local Street fund and anticipates $3,570,297 million in new revenue for
FY21/22. In this next fiscal year, the City is planning to use $1,110,000 million
on pavement rehabilitation projects and $1,511,160 on our annual Pavement
Management Program, signal repair and maintenance and concrete services. The
remaining $949,000 is being accumulated for future projects.
Over the Five Year Plan it is anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the
following manner:
Percent Type of Improvement
40 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of Existing Roadways
50 Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement Striping and Maintenance
7 Concrete Services (ADA, Repair and Sidewalks)
3 Pavement Management
Page 233
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE
AMENDED MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN COVERING FY2020/2021 THROUGH
FY2024/2025
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in
November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to
impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the
incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation
improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set
forth in Ordinance No. 04-01 of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for
revenue from the Local Street Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code 190300 and Ordinance No. 04-01
require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportation-
related construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort
base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan,
which for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $2,225,757.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HERBY RESOLVES, that the Amended Measure
I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is
hereby adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October 2021.
_____________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
City Clerk
Page 234
Resolution Number: 2020-094 Resolution Approval Date: 8/19/20 Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Contacl Person/Title: Engineer
Phone: (909)774-4037 Email: Gianfranco.Laurie@cityofrc.us
ls Project In
City's
Non-motorized
Transportation
Plan? 1�•t:1•• • 1■:.1(1 [:JM (Yes/No)
4th St from Haven Ave lo Milliken Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation 4th SI from Milliken Ave to Ontario Mills Dr -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation 6th St from Hellman Ave to Archibald Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Banyan St from Milliken Ave to Rochester Ave -Yes Pavement Rehabilitation Banyan St from Rochester Ave to Etiwanda Ave -Yes Pavement Rehabilitation Carnelian St from Base Line Rd to Rte 210 -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd -Yes Pavement Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Highland Ave to Base Line Rd -Yes Pavement Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Rte 210 to V\lllson Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from \1\/hillram Ave to Arrow Rte -Yes IJ\lidening and Rehabilitation Foothill Blvd from 1-15 Freeway to East Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Haven Ave from Base Line Rd to Rte 210 -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Haven Ave from Rte 210 to IJ\lilson Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Highland Ave from Beryl SI to Archibald Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Lemon Ave from London Ave to Haven Ave -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Local Overlay at Various Locations (Attached Street Yes List) -Pavement Rehabilitation Milliken Ave from Rte 21 Oto Banyan St -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from 6th SI to Arrow Rte -Pavement Yes Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from Banyan St to Highland Ave -Yes Pavement Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to Banyan St -No Pavement Rehabilitation PY. 11:..i., I �·-:. 111• !ADA Corrective Measures -City Vl/ide I No I Concrete Contract Services -Maintenance City Vl/ide I No
l�avement Management -Evaluate Pavement Condition I City \Mde No
Rancho Cucamonga
Does Project
have an ATP Component?
(Yes/No)
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No No
No
Measure I Local Pass-through Program
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Fiscal Years 2020/2021 thru 2024/2025
FY2020/21 Est. Revenue FY2021/22 Est. Revenue FY2022/23 Est. Revenue
ls the Project on the
City's Nexus Study Estimated Total $2,617,906.00 $3,118,788.00 $2,999,650.00 list? Project Cost (Pub!ic/DIF Share %) Carryover Current Carryover Current Carryover Current Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Funds Estimate
0% 100% $300,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $500,000.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $520,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $750,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $760,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $40,000.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $960,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $880,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $20,000.00 0.00 850,000.00
0% 100% $1,108,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $825,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 650,000.00
0% 100% $900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 900,000.00
0% 100% $500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $675,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $1,040,000.00 0.00 708,102.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $547,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $650,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $520,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0% 100% $979,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Named Projects Total: SO.DO $2,001,656.00 SO.DO $100,000.00 SO.DO $2,600,000.00 Total Carryover+ Estimate: $ $2,001,656.00 $100,000.00 $2,600,000.00 (%) Named Projects to FY Est. Revenue: 76.46% 3.2% 86.67%
$500,000.00 11,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
$500,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
$425,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 125,000.00
Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT A
Rancho Cucamonga
6/30/20 Carryover Balance: I $4,634,1,1.0• 1
FY2023/24 Est. Revenue FY2024/25 Est. Revenue Total Est. Rev.
$3,089,312.00 $3,184,710.00 $15,010,366.00
Carryover Current Carryover Current Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Total
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $300,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $200,000.00
0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 $500,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 520,000.00 $520,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $40,000.00
0.00 $900,000.00 0.00 0.00 $940,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $870,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
0.00 825,000.00 0.00 0.00 $825,000,00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $850,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $900,000.00
0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 $500,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $708,102.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 650,000.00 $650,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 520,000.00 $520,000.00
0.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 $150,000.00
SO.DO $2,875,000.00 SO.DO $1,690,000.00 $9,466,656,00
$2,875,000.00 $1,690,000.00
93.06% 53.07%
100,000.00 100,000.00
100,000.00 100,000.00 $500,000.00
25,000.00 125,000.00 $300,000.00
Generated on: 8/3/2020
$40,000.00
$411,000.00
Page 235
I Signal Contract Seivices -Maintenance City Wide I No No I I $3,930,000.00 871,312.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 $3,951,312.00 I
I Striping Contract Seivices-Maintenance City \1\/ide I No No I I $750,000.00 182,097.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 $782,097.00 I
Categorical Projects Total; $1,164,409.00 $1,145,000.00 $1,245,000.00 $1,145,000,00 $1,245,000.00 $4,944,409.00 I
(%) Categorical Projects to FY Est. Revenue: 44,48% 36.71% 41.50% 37.08% 39.09%
Total Carryover Programming: so.ool
Total Estimated Programming: s14,400,o65.001
Total Programming: s14,400,o65.00l
Total Programming is currently 73.68% (must not exceed 150%) of Canyover Balance+ Total Est. Revenue.
Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 of 2 Generated on: 8/3/2020
Add Named Projects: Arrow @ Railroad Spur/New Panels FY20/21 = $37,785 Total= $35,786 Church St.: Haven FY20/21 = $755,763.28 Total = $755,768.28
Highlighted numbers are updated and include the added projects below.
Page 236
Page 237
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA
Corporation for the Completion of a Local Roadway Safety Plan in the
Amount of $70,948, Plus a 10% Contingency, and Authorization of
Appropriations from the Federal Grants (Fund 275) and Citywide Capital
Infrastructure (Fund 198) Funds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement with KOA
Corporation (on fille with the City Clerk) for the completion of a Local Roadway Safety
Plan in the amount of $70,948;
2. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,095;
3. Authorize appropriation of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant revenue
in the amount of $72,000 to the Federal Grants Fund (Fund 275); and
4. Authorize appropriations of expenditures in the amount of $70,238 from the Federal
Grants Fund (Fund 275) and $7,805 from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvements Fund
(Fund 198)
BACKGROUND:
Federal regulations require that each State develop a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). An
SHSP is a statewide data-driven roadway safety plan that coordinates efforts to reduce traffic
related accidents (fatalities and injuries) on all public roadways.
While local agencies can reference the SHSP to improve roadway safety, having a Local
Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is more desirable as it addresses targeted traffic safety concerns
and challenges specific to the local jurisdiction. Developing an LRSP establishes a framework to
systematically identify and evaluate roadway safety problems and recommend roadway safety
improvements. Having an LRSP in place allows local agencies to prioritize a list of improvements
and actions that contribute to the statewide plan.
In October 2019, Caltrans announced a funding call for applications to help support the
development of LRSPs. Funds were awarded to local agencies on a first come first serve basis.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga was notified on January 8, 2020 that $72,000 had been awarded
to the City for the development of a LRSP. A 10% local match will also be required.
Page 238
Page 2
9
5
3
ANALYSIS:
Engineering Staff has worked with the Procurement Division, providing a detailed scope of
services to develop a form Request for Proposals (RFP) to find a qualified consultant to complete
the LRSP. An RFP, #21/22-003 was posted and advertised on the City’s electronic bidding
system, Planet Bids, on April 27, 2021. There were nine hundred fifty-three (953) notified vendors,
thirty-eight (38) prospective vendors, and five (5) responses were received. An evaluation panel
was formed, and the proposal responses were reviewed and rated in accordance with the criteria
identified in the RFP. After evaluation, staff found that it is in the City’s best interest to award a
Professional Services Agreement to KOA Corporation for the completion of the LRSP. All
applicable solicitation documentation is on file in Planet Bids.
A Best and Final Offer (BAFO) was submitted by KOA Corporation with a fee in the amount of
$70,948 for the completion of the LRSP. Staff has determined the KOA Corporation is able to
meet the needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, scope and fee schedule.
KOA’s scope of work includes engagement of key staff and stakeholders to identify potential
roadway safety projects and priorities; review of traffic patterns, roadway features, traffic volumes,
traffic collision data, and other environmental conditions; identification of goals, priorities, and
safety countermeasures; and preparation of the final plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The estimated cost for the proposed contract including a 10% contingency is $78,043. The grant
program requires an 10% match from local funds, totaling $7,805 including contingency. Upon
completion of the project, the City will be eligible for reimbursement of 90% of the contract costs
from the LRSP grant program up to the $72,000 grant award.
Budget for this project has not been included in the FY2021/22 Budget, therefore appropriations
are needed to account for both grant revenue and project expenditures in the following amounts
and accounts:
Revenue:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
1275208-4750/2082-0 Federal Grants (275)Caltrans Grant Revenue -
Local Roadway Safety Plan
$72,000
Expenditures:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
1275208-5300/2082-4215 Federal Grants (275)Caltrans Portion – Local
Roadway Safety Plan
$70,238
1198303-5300/2082-4215 Citywide Infrastructure
Improvements (198)
City Match - Local Roadway
Safety Plan
$7,805
Total $78,043
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing for continuous improvement by planning for future construction
of high-quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 239
980
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Hunt Gracia, Community Services Director
Cristina Gorka, Box Office Coordinator
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Acceptance and Appropriation of Shuttered
Venue Operators Grant Funds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the acceptance and appropriation of federal funds
from the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant.
BACKGROUND:
The Shuttered Venue Operators Grant (SVOG) program was established in Section 324 of the
Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, signed into law on
December 27, 2020 and amended by the American Rescue Plan Act signed into law on March
11, 2021. The program includes over $16 billion in grants to shuttered venues, to be administered
by the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Disaster Assistance. Eligible applicants may
qualify for grants equal to 45% of their 2019 gross earned revenue.
Funds may only be used for specific expenses which include payroll, rent, utility, worker protection
expenditures, payments to independent contractors, other ordinary and necessary business
expenses, licensing, fees, insurance, advertising, and capital expenditures related to producing a
theatrical or live performing arts production.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Lewis Family Playhouse and operations at the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center were shut down in March of 2020. In April 2021 the City applied for the
SVOG with the dual intentions of offsetting budgetary impacts from the closure and safely
reopening and providing operations and programming to our community with a goal of presenting
a season in Fall of 2022.
ANALYSIS:
In July 2021, the City was awarded $432,654.62 from the federal Shuttered Venue Operators
Grant for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center to support the ongoing operations of the performing
arts industry. In September, the City was granted a Supplemental Award for $216,327.31. Award
amounts are based on the loss between earned revenue from 2019 compared to the earned
revenue in 2020 and 2021. Total grant funds received amount to $648,981.31.
The City can use these funds on eligible expenses incurred or accrued between March 1, 2020
through June 30, 2022. Payments on expenses must be completed by January 22, 2023.These
Page 240
Page 2
9
5
6
funds will be used to pay for theatre staff salaries, the contract with AMS Planning & Research,
who are currently conducting an analysis regarding the future of programming at the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center, and to purchase equipment to move performances outdoors for the
interim until it is safe for indoor performances to return.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding will be received into the Federal Grants Fund 275, and on a quarterly basis, the General
Fund will be reimbursed for eligible expenditure. Interest earned on SVOG funds must be utilized
towards eligible expenditures, as such the appropriations are reflecting a nominal amount of
interest in addition to the grant award.
Federal Grants Fund - Grant Income-Federal – 1275000-4750/2088-0 for $649,500
Federal Grants Fund – Transfers Out – 1275208-9001/2088275-0 for $649,500
General Fund – Transfers in from Fund 275 – 1001000-8275 for $649,500
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This effort supports the vision and values of the City Council by building on our success as a world
class community to find a sustainable means to continue presenting high quality arts and
entertainment, thereby intentionally embracing and anticipating the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 241
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking
District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street,
and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
100) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt the attached resolution to establish the “Estacia Street, et al.” residential permit
parking district on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, and
Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue;
2) Waive fees for the first issuance of permits for the proposed residential permit parking
district; and
3) Direct staff to continue efforts with property management for the Arte apartment complex
to modify the property’s parking management plan to address on-site parking efficiency,
provide for off-site parking supply where possible, and address measures to communicate
and enforce parking protocols and limitations to new and existing residents.
BACKGROUND:
Beginning in May of this year, staff received multiple inquiries from residents of the neighborhood
generally located north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Hermosa Avenue (Tract 9153) and
comprised of Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Effen Street, Dorset Court, and
Cambridge Avenue (see Attachment 1). Residents expressed concerns with nuisance activity as
well as vehicles parked in violation of the 72-hour limit per the City’s ordinance. This pattern of
illegal parking had been accompanied with trash being left in the street. As an initial response,
the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (Police Department) had been called upon to
issue citations and remove illegally parked vehicles along the streets within the area. In addition,
staff organized and held a community meeting on June 3, 2021, to better understand concerns
and provide information on the process to form a permit parking district.
During this meeting, residents reported that vehicles causing these concerns originate from
outside of the immediate neighborhood, specifically from the Arte apartment complex (Arte) and
Page 242
Page 2
9
9
2
have led to a lack of available on street parking for residents and guests, blocking of driveways
and mailboxes, and concern for public safety. Following the process as outlined in Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) Section 10.50, a representative of the neighborhood has
provided a petition showing support from 60 of the 68 addresses in the neighborhood, or 88% of
the residents, for the creation of a permit parking district along Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue,
Stafford Street, Effen Street, Dorset Court, and Cambridge Avenue.
On September 15, 2015, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the petition. During
the hearing, the City Council received testimony from residents of the neighborhood with respect
to the impacts of overflow parking from Arte, which is located at the northeast corner of Hermosa
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Among the impacts identified were occupation of limited on-street
parking spaces, littering and animal waste, noise, and physical altercations involving residents of
the apartment complex. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council directed staff to
schedule an administrative hearing on October 20, 2021, to further consider the petition. As well,
staff was asked to work with Arte’s property manager to resolve the overflow parking issues
including enforcement of the project’s conditions of approval relative to its parking management
plan, if necessary.
Arte is a mixed-use development that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 26,
2016 for construction of 182 units including 5 live-work units. Per the RCMC, Arte was required
to have a total of 388 parking spaces. This quantity was based on the summation of the uses
within it including the number of bedrooms in each apartment unit, the live/work commercial floor
area, and guest parking. As part of the application process, the developer submitted a Minor
Exception request to allow them to provide 24.48% less parking stalls than the amount required
by the RCMC. A reduction of 24.48% in the number of required parking stalls equates to 293
stalls being provided. Minor Exceptions may be granted to modify certain requirements of the
RCMC described in RCMC Sections 17.16.110 (Minor Exceptions) and 17.64.060 (Reductions in
Parking Requirements). The maximum reduction in the parking requirement that is allowed with
a Minor Exception by the RCMC is 25%. Any request for a reduction that exceeds 25% requires
the approval of a Variance application. The Planning Commission approved this Minor Exception
request in conjunction with the approval of the overall project.
In support of the requested Minor Exception, the developer submitted a parking analysis prepared
on May 4, 2016 by Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers (LLG) that was based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers’ Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition, the Urban Land Institute’s
Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, the American Community Survey’s Parking Reform Made Easy
publication, and similar projects in San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties. This
analysis concluded that with the requested parking reduction, the parking supply would range
from operating in a deficit of 9 spaces to providing a surplus of 71 spaces, with the median
estimate being a surplus of 29 spaces. To verify these conclusions, staff hired Nelson Nygaard to
perform an independent third-party review of LLG’s parking analysis. Nelson Nygaard’s review
proposed that even with the then proposed parking reduction, the parking supply would likely be
overbuilt “compared to peer developments and by nationally recognized standards”. While the
parking analysis and third-party peer review supported the requested parking reduction, the
project was designed and conditioned to manage parking supply and demand through certain
design decisions, including:
Garage spaces are located on the first floor and oriented to the project’s interior;
Free standing carports are located primarily along the north and east project perimeter;
Tandem spaces are located throughout the project and primarily adjacent to garages;
Page 243
Page 3
9
9
2
Tandem spaces are to be assigned to the same tenant to avoid conflicts; and
The requirement to construct 16 on-street public parking spaces along the Hermosa
Avenue frontage.
Further, the developer was required, as a condition of approval (Planning Department Special
Condition No. 3 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-51), to prepare a Parking
Management Plan for the City Planner’s approval prior to occupancy. The plan is subject to
periodic review by the City Planner, who may require additional measures if it is determined that
on-site parking supply is not adequately meeting demand. This special condition of approval
reads as follows:
A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for Planning Director review and
approval prior to occupancy. The Parking Management Plan shall include, at a
minimum, requirements that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly
monitored. The Planning Director may periodically review and require additional
parking mitigation measures if it is determined that the on-site parking is
inadequate to meet the project’s ongoing parking demand.
The parking management plan required the tenant garages and parking spaces to remain free of
personal possessions so that the parking spaces were exclusively available for vehicles. The
property owner must comply with the parking management plan to help ensure that the maximum
amount of on-site parking is available for tenants and guests. Aside from the applications for a
Design Review, Minor Exception, and Tree Removal Permit, there were no other entitlements,
such as a Conditional Use Permit, required by the RCMC nor requested by the applicant for Arte.
ANALYSIS:
Following the September 15, 2021 public hearing, a cross departmental team from the Planning
Department, Community Improvement Division, Police Department, and Engineering Services
Department sought to better understand Arte’s parking operation and to follow up on prior
conversations with the property manager related to on-site parking management. This pursuit has
entailed two on-site garage inspections with Arte’s management, discussions to gain a better
understanding from the property manager of on-site parking protocols, and encouraging and
attending meetings and discussions with an adjacent business owner to identify opportunities for
Arte to provide managed off-site parking.
Parking Management Protocols
Based on these latest conversations with the property manager, staff was able to obtain a clearer
understanding of the parking supply and management protocols for the complex. The site has a
total of 293 spaces on site consisting of the following:
Assigned Spaces
Tandem Garage Spaces: 128 spaces (64 x 2 spaces each)
Single Car Garage Spaces: 35 spaces
Carports: 73 spaces
Rental Carports: 8 spaces
Total: 244 spaces
Unassigned Spaces for Resident Use
Single Spaces: 14 spaces
Future Resident Spaces: 2 spaces
Page 244
Page 4
9
9
2
Retail Spaces: 10 spaces
Handicap Accessible Spaces: 7 spaces
Electric Vehicle Spaces: 4 spaces
Guest Spaces: 2 spaces
Tandem Spaces: 10 spaces (5 x 2 spaces each)
Total: 49 spaces
Assignment of spaces is based on the bedroom count of the unit:
1-Bedroom: 1 space
2-Bedroom: 2 spaces
3-Bedroom: 2 spaces
Finally, the assigned rental carports listed above are assigned to residents for an additional fee
of $100 per month. At this time, each of these spaces have been rented and the property manager
is maintaining a waiting list of other residents who have made requests for additional spaces.
Garage Inspections
At the September 15, 2021 public hearing, the City Council directed staff to verify compliance with
the parking management plan by inspecting the building’s parking garages. Arte’s property
manager voluntarily consented to Community Improvement staff participating in an inspection,
and therefore no inspection warrant was needed. On September 21 and September 29, 2021,
Community Improvement staff accompanied Arte property management on their quarterly garage
inspections. During those inspections, four of the 96 (4%) garages were found to be used for
storage in a manner that would not allow them to house a vehicle, thus violating the requirements
of the parking management plan. The property manager mentioned to staff that three out of the
four associated units were in litigation with the complex. Community Improvement has since
issued compliance orders for these four garages and will follow up to ensure that the violations
are resolved.
It should be noted that during the inspections staff were approached by two residents of Arte who
indicated that they have four vehicles and were frustrated that the manager would only assign
them two parking spaces for a two-bedroom unit. This lends credence to staff’s observation and
theory that while the parking analysis and third-party peer review indicated that the site should
experience a surplus of parking supply, the higher rents in developments like Arte are tending to
result in units being occupied by more adults living in each unit—especially those with higher
bedroom counts—than was likely assumed in the parking analysis leading to a shortfall in parking
supply.
Off-Site Parking Opportunities
Understanding that the current parking demand is exceeding supply, the property manager has
identified two potential nearby sites for off-site parking. However, they do not currently control
either site. The first is the vacant single-family property on Foothill Boulevard immediately to the
east of Arte. The property manager has contacted the property owner in an attempt to acquire the
property but to date has not been able to secure the property. The property owner of the adjacent
residential property has indicated they are not interested in selling at this time. The second
opportunity would be a shared (by time of day) parking agreement with Kick Back Jack’s (KBJ)
on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. Staff has participated in
some discussions between both the property manager and the owners of KBJ to encourage dialog
Page 245
Page 5
9
9
2
and provide community perspective. Unfortunately, Kick Back Jacks does not own the property,
they are a tenant, and to date the property owner has not shown a desire to move forward with a
shared arrangement due to liability and management concerns. Discussions related to such an
agreement are ongoing at this time but there is no immediate prospect for an agreement.
Next Steps
While current discussions with the property manager have been progressing, it is clear that
resolution of the overflow parking and associated impacts described above will not occur
immediately or even in the next several months and that a successful solution will require a
combination of diligent parking management, the addition of off-site parking where and when
possible, and restriction of access to free and available on-street parking in adjacent
neighborhoods through the implementation of residential permit parking districts.
Parking Management Plan
In accordance with the Planning Department Special Condition No. 3, staff recommends that the
parking management plan be updated by the property manager and resubmitted to the City. This
update should incorporate the current parking inventory and protocols along with modifications
that could make more efficient use of the available on-site parking. Potential opportunities for
more efficient parking management could include:
Assigning of future resident and retail spaces to residents who may only need parking
after normal business hours;
Issuance of temporary guest permits to manage the number of guest vehicles on the site
at any given time;
Issuance of resident permits (if such a system is not already in place) for all vehicles
registered to residents to allow for easy identification of violators on the property;
Rigorous notification to existing and new residents of parking protocols and limitations
along with consequences for violations via community newsletters, posted notices, sales
scripts, and lease disclosures;
Off-site parking protocols (if applicable) to ensure compliance with shared or off-site
parking agreements. Future prospects include the northeast corner of Hermosa and
Foothill and the property to the east of Kick Back Jack’s; and
Regular review of the parking management plan to monitor effectiveness.
Staff would work collaboratively with the property manager to determine which of these
mechanisms could be most effective and practical as well as identifying other industry best
practices. The plan would be reviewed for approval by the Planning and Engineering Services
Directors.
Off-Site Parking Supply
The parking management plan’s capacity is inherently limited by the number of parking spaces
that are available on-site. Staff will continue to encourage ongoing dialog between the property
manager and all nearby property owners as well as KBJ’s owners to vet the possibility of additional
off-site parking capacity. Protocols for management of off-site parking that is secured by Arte
should be included in the complex’s parking management plan and updated as changes to off-
site supply occur.
Page 246
Page 6
9
9
2
Residential Permit Parking Districts
As mentioned above, effective reduction and management of overflow parking will need to include
the implementation of residential permit parking districts in the vicinity of Arte. Experience has
shown that while on-site parking management and the addition of parking supply can curb the
parking demand to a certain extent, the availability of free and unrestricted parking on nearby
streets tends to cause the demand for parking to expand because neighborhood parking may be
closer and more convenient than the official supply, it allows for more adults to occupy an
apartment, and makes the decision for a family or individuals to buy a second or third car easier
because parking is freely available. As well, off-site parking agreements may take long periods of
time for the property manager to secure and are often subject to term limitations that may
reintroduce a parking shortfall in the future.
Residential permit parking districts are a means provided for in the California Vehicle Code and
municipal code to allow for residents of the parking district to have more control over the
availability of on-street parking in their neighborhood. While the process of obtaining permits can
be cumbersome at first, the system is intended to minimize inconvenience by providing multiple
means of obtaining resident permits as well as guest and “OK TO PARK” permits for larger parties.
For the purposes of the petition before the City Council, staff has recommended that the first-time
permit issuance fee be waived and that the maximum number of permits be mailed to each
resident in the district along with instructions on obtaining guest permits when needed.
Chapter 10.50.020 of the RCMC requires that the City Council make the following findings prior
to adoption of a resolution creating a residential permit parking district:
A. Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking
district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of
available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district;
Vehicles parked within the proposed residential permit parking district are observed to
originate from outside of the neighborhood and have regularly interfered with the use of
on street parking by residents and their guests. Many of the vehicles are observed to be
owned by residents outside of the immediate neighborhood.
B. The interference by such vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly
intervals;
The interference of on street parking is occurring significantly and daily.
C. That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking
district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental
pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed
district;
Vehicles from outside the community have created impacts including a reduction of
parking available for residents, litter, and concerns for public safety leading to potential
devaluation of real property.
D. That 75% of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit
parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition);
Page 247
Page 7
9
9
2
The petition requesting the creation of the residential permit parking district is supported
by 60 out of 68 addresses in the neighborhood (see Attachment 2), which is 88% of the
residents within the proposed district.
E. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential
areas;
With one exception (see information on Dorset Court below), the proposed residential
permit parking district consists of all contiguous streets of the neighborhood west of and
connecting to Hermosa Avenue. There are commercial uses and apartments south and
southeast of the proposed parking district along Foothill Boulevard whose customers and
residents would not be eligible to obtain permits since they would not be part of the district.
There is also a single-family neighborhood to the east of the proposed district and north
of the apartments. Some residents from this neighborhood attended the community
meeting in June and expressed concerns with overflow parking, however staff has not
received a petition requesting a permit parking district from this neighborhood. Should the
implementation of the proposed district result in displaced parking that is of concern to
residents east of Hermosa Avenue, staff will assist them with processing a request for a
similar parking district.
F. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is
practical.
Staff worked with members of the community to explore other options for parking
restrictions, such as time specific restriction of parking, complete restriction of parking,
and different boundaries for the proposed permit parking district among others but these
options did not satisfy the needs of the neighborhood. Continued enforcement of the
violations occurring on the streets within the proposed permit parking district have also
proved to be costly and ineffective in discouraging further violations. It was determined
that the requested residential permit parking district is the most appropriate and practical
solution to address these impacts.
The installation of “permit parking only” signs would allow patrolling officers to cite or tow violators
at their discretion depending on circumstances including extent of violations, persistence of
violations and availability of resources. Residential permit parking districts have been created and
proven to be effective in several areas of the City. The permit parking district is anticipated to
alleviate these impacts to the neighborhood and protect the community’s quality of life.
In discussions with the residents, concerns were raised about the nominal fees charged for
issuance of permits as part of the residential permit parking program. These fees were initially
implemented many years ago to defray some of the cost for implementation of such districts. The
amount collected has not been increased since the inception of the program and covers only a
small portion of the actual cost of implementation of the district and issuance of the permits. In an
effort to partner with the neighborhood in seeking a solution to the problems described above
related to overflow parking in the neighborhood, staff agreed to recommend a one-time fee waiver
for the initial issuance of permits in this district as part of its creation. Staff will also be evaluating
the program to determine how best to fund the creation and operation of future districts.
Finally, as alluded to above, staff has made a change to the attached resolution from the draft
presented on September 15, 2021 as it relates to the boundaries of the proposed residential
permit parking district. Following the public hearing, staff noted that the residents of the small cul-
Page 248
Page 8
9
9
2
de-sac of Dorset Court were split in their desire to form the district. While it is the City’s normal
procedure and preference to provide for contiguous and complete networks of streets within a
permit parking district, out of respect for those residing on Dorset Court, the resolution and
associated map has been revised to exclude this street from the district. This would allow for free
and unrestricted public parking on this cul-de-sac eliminating the need for residents of Dorset
Court and their guests to obtain and display permits to park on their street. However, frontages
along Elmhurst would remain in the district for simplicity of understanding to drivers and
consistency of enforcement by the Police Department. One ramification of this change is that
residents living on Dorset Court (i.e., those at 10068 to 10078 Dorset Court) would not be eligible
to obtain parking permits for the district. With the elimination of Dorset Court from the proposed
district, the final tally of signatures in support is 58 out of 63 or 92%.
Finally, the City can continue to enforce the requirements of the parking management plan and
minimum parking counts imposed on the Arte project as part of the project’s initial approval. To
date, Community Improvement expects to be able to obtain compliance through the issuance of
compliance orders. However, the City has other available remedies to ensure continued
compliance, including the issuance of administrative citations, which carry fines for violations of
permit conditions. A violation of a permit condition constitutes a violation of the Municipal Code,
which can also be remedied through code enforcement and nuisance abatement actions.
However, the fact that some tenants are legally parking their vehicles on city streets does not, in
and of itself, constitute a public nuisance attributable to the Arte complex. The Municipal Code
and State law definitions of a public nuisance primarily address the maintenance or operation of
property in a condition that poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Given that the
complex provides the required number of parking spaces, the condition of the property is not the
primary problem. Instead, the parking problem is attributable to individual tenants owning more
cars than parking spaces required to be available at the building, causing these tenants to find
the nearest legal parking spaces for their surplus vehicles. Nuisances tend not to be found where
an activity is authorized by law, such as parking on public streets. Further, the City Attorney has
opined that it is unlikely the city would be successful in pursuing a nuisance case against Arte as
it is highly unlikely a court would revoke the project entitlements, rendering all the residents of the
complex homeless, because Arte residents are legally parking on a public street. For this reason,
staff believes that establishing a permit parking district to prohibit the overflow parking is the most
effective way to resolve the problem.
Should the City Council not desire to move forward with permit parking at this time, it is
recommended that the City Council direct staff to notify all the property owners who signed the
petition that the request was denied. Further, staff also recommends we bring this item back in 6
months to see if progress has been made by Arte in obtaining additional parking. Finally, it is
recommended that Community Improvement be directed to move forward and enforce all property
violations in the neighborhood related to trash cans left out on the street, which many neighbors
are doing to prevent parking in front of their property. This violation has been held in abeyance
during the permit parking district process but is otherwise enforced citywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of this action would be minor, consisting of the cost of parking passes,
installation of signs, and the associated administration of the permit parking program for an
additional 63 residences. City already has several permit parking districts, and this district would
adopt the same policies and procedures.
Page 249
Page 9
9
9
2
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Creation of the proposed permit parking district addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by
establishing programs that maintain the high quality of life in local neighborhoods that promote a
world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Petition Map
Attachment 3 - Resolution No. 2021-100 (Revised)
Page 250
ATTACHMENT 1
1
6
9
9
ESTACIA STREET, ET AL.
RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT
VICINITY MAP
Map not to scale
HAVEN AVENUEFOOTHILL BOULEVARD
CHURCH STREETHERMOSA AVENUEPage 251
DORSET CTSTAFFORD STMAP –EFFEN ST, ELMHURST AVE, DORSET CT, STAFFORD ST, CAMBRIDGE, & ESTACIA STUPDATED: 10/11/2021KEY: ‐SIGN (65/68)‐NOT SIGN (3/68)‐YES (60/68) ~ 88%‐NO (5/68) ~ 7% Page 252
Resolution No. 2021-100 -Page 1 of 5
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING THE “ESTACIA
STREET, ET AL.” PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.50
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
A. Recitals
1. California Vehicle Code Section 22507 allows a general law city to establish by
resolution a preferential parking program by which there is a designation of certain
streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents adjacent to
the streets for their use and the use of their guests.
2. Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code permits the establishment
of a Permit Parking District in an area in which vehicles operated by persons whose
destinations are outside of the proposed Permit Parking District substantially and
regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use by
residents.
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a map of an area herein referred to as “Estacia Street,
et al.” and also hereinafter referred to as the “Parking District” in which vehicles
operated by persons whose destination is outside of the boundaries of the proposed
district, substantially and regularly interfering with the use and availability of parking
spaces in the Parking District.
4. Substantial evidence has been presented to this Council demonstrating that the
persons referred to in Recital 3 above, not only occupy a majority of the parking spaces
in the Parking District, but also block access to the Parking District’s residences,
disrupt delivery of mail and packages, and deposit trash and litter within the Parking
District, and that these activities occur at regular and significant intervals.
5. It is the purpose of this Resolution to establish the Parking District as an area within
which parking shall be limited at all times to parking by residents of that Parking
District, their guests, and those persons exempt from that limitation pursuant to
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100.
6. Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.040, the residents of
the proposed Permit Parking District’s petition shall be submitted before the City
Council with the City Engineer’s Recommendation and Report which is attached
hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof.
7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been satisfied.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
Page 253
Resolution No. 2021-100 -Page 2 of 5
1
7
0
0
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby finds that all the facts stated in Part A of this Resolution are true
and correct.
2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this City Council including the evidence
contained in the staff report, the City Council further finds and determines as follows:
A. Vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are outside of the Parking
District as defined in Subsection 10.50.020(A) of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of
parking spaces for use of residents within the Parking District;
B. The interference by the vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above occurs at
regular and significant intervals;
C. The vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above cause and are the source of
unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, and environmental pollution within the Parking
District;
D. A petition of the Residents of the proposed Permit Parking District has been
received by the City Engineer and said petition was confirmed to have more than
75% of the Residents agree to the establishment of the Permit Parking District.
E. No unreasonable displacement of vehicles operated by persons whose destination
is outside of the Parking District will result into surrounding residential areas; and
F. No alternative solution, other than the establishment of the Permit Parking District
is feasible or practical.
3. Based on the findings set forth in Paragraph 2 above, the Parking District is hereby
established as a Permit Parking District pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 10.50
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and parking therein is restricted to those
residents and their guests possessing permits issued by the City Engineer or his
designee and those exempt pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
10.50.100.
4. The City Engineer’s Recommendation and Report has been submitted and the City
Council accepts and approves said Recommendation and Report inclusive of Cost of
Parking Permits.
5. The City Engineer is hereby instructed to immediately cause appropriate signs to be
placed and posted within the Parking District indicating the parking limitations
established by this Resolution and to implement and administer the permit process
specified in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 10.50.070 and 10.50.080.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Page 254
Resolution No. 2021-100 -Page 3 of 5
1
7
0
0
EXHIBIT A
“Estacia Street et al.” Permit Parking District
The proposed district includes the houses fronting Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford
Street, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona
Avenue and shall restrict parking on both sides of these streets to vehicles with valid permits
or exemptions as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
Page 255
Residential Parking Permit Program Page 1
Updated: 7/26/2021
Resolution No. 2021-100 -Page 4 of 5
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT PROGRAM
The Parking Permit District Program is governed by Section 10.50, “Permit Parking Districts” of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and allows residents of a Permit Parking District special permits that
exempt them and their guests from certain on-street parking restrictions.
REQUESTING A PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT
Requests for creation of a Permit Parking District may be made by submitting a petition signed by at least
seventy-five percent (75%) of the residents (one vote per address) within the boundaries of the proposed district
(as designated in the petition) to the Engineering Services Department. All requests will be reviewed for
conformance with program requirements defined in Section 10.50, “Permit Parking Districts” of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code including the following required findings:
Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may
substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of
residents within the proposed permit parking district;
The interference by commuter vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals;
That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or
are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for
residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district;
That 75 percent of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking
privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition);
That no unreasonable displacement of commuter vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas;
That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is feasible or
practical.
Upon completion of this review, City staff will inform applicants of their findings. Requests that meet program
requirements will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The City Council may establish the
requested Permit Parking District by adoption of a resolution.
LIMITATIONS
A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.44.130, "Storage of Vehicles upon Streets", of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.44.130, a vehicle may not park in the
same parking space on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours.
As well, parking permits do not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.64.030 "Parking Restriction", of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.64.030, it is unlawful for any person to park or
store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat upon any public street or highway or alley
within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM on any day.
EXHIBIT B
Engineer’s Recommendations
Page 256
Residential Parking Permit Program Page 2
Updated: 7/26/2021
Resolution No. 2021-100 -Page 5 of 5
TYPES OF PERMITS AND PROPER DISPLAY
The City currently issues a mirror-hanger style permit which shall be hung from the inside rear view mirror, visible
from the front of the vehicle. Temporary guest parking permits are to be placed on the dashboard with the printed
side visible from the front of the vehicle.
OBTAINING PARKING PERMITS
Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for parking permits.
Proof of residency less than 30 days old is required upon application for permits. A maximum of five (5) parking
permits may be issued to residents of a single dwelling unit. Requests for more than five (5) parking permits per
address are subject to review by the City Engineer.
Parking permits may be obtained in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM at City Hall, located
at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 or by mailing a copy of your information to the
Engineering Services Department at the address listed below.
Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms (originals will be
reviewed for proof of residency and returned to the requestor):
Current utility bill, bank statement, credit card bill, or other bill statement that was sent through the
mail on a monthly billing cycle
Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days
Proof of property ownership, tax bill or new escrow papers
EXPIRATION
Parking permits are valid for a period of up to five (5) years. Parking permits currently being issued will expire
on July 31, 2025.
COSTS
Parking Permit $10 for the first vehicle plus $2 for each
additional vehicle (maximum of 5) when
registered all at the same time.
Replacement of lost, stolen, or damaged permits $10 each
Temporary Guest Parking Permit Free
The cost listed for parking permits is based on the cost of materials and staff time to manage the program and
for keeping records. Costs are subject to change.
TEMPORARY GUEST PARKING PERMITS
Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for Temporary Guest
Parking Permits which are valid for one day. If a resident desire more than fifty (50) Temporary Guest Parking
Permits for a special event, the resident may apply for a special event permit that will temporarily suspend the
need for visitors to display a parking permit. Staff may require that the resident fulfill special conditions, such as
notifying neighbors of the special event, and covering the permit parking district regulation signs.
FINE FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS
Fine per violation $50 (Fines are subject to change)
PROGRAM CONTACT INFORMATION
City of Rancho Cucamonga / Engineering Services Department
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2700
Page 257
“Estacia Street, et al.”
Residential Permit
Parking District
Support (60/68) = 88%
Does not support (5/68)
Activities Since September
Action Items
Understand Current Parking Management Protocols
Perform Garage Inspections
Encourage Increased Off-Site Parking Supply
Evaluate Public Nuisance Question
Parking Management Protocols
•Project Approvals
•Approved by Planning Commission in 2016
•Design Review
•Minor Exception (Parking Reduction)
•Tree Removal Permit
•182 Units (Including 5 Live/Work Units)
•293 Parking Spaces (24.48% Reduction)
Parking Management Protocols
•Minor Exception Request
•Parking Study by LLG Engineers
•Peer Review by Nelson Nygaard
Parking Management Protocols
Planning Department Special Condition No. 3
A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for Planning
Director review and approval prior to occupancy. The Parking
Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, requirements
that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly
monitored. The Planning Director may periodically review and
require additional parking mitigation measures if it is
determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the
project’s ongoing parking demand.
Parking Management Protocols
Assigned Parking Spaces
Tandem Garage Spaces 128 spaces
Single Car Garage Spaces 35 spaces
Carports 73 spaces
Rental Carports 8 spaces
Total 244 spaces
Parking Management Protocols
Unassigned Spaces
Single Spaces 14 spaces
Future Resident Spaces 2 spaces
Retail Spaces 10 spaces
Handicap Accessible Spaces 7 spaces
Electric Vehicle Spaces 4 spaces
Guest Spaces 2 spaces
Tandem Spaces 10 spaces
Total 49 spaces
Garage Inspections
•Inspections on 9/21 and 9/29
•4 Violations (4%) Identified
•Compliance Orders Issued
Off -Site Parking Opportunities
Kick Back
Jack’s
Ju
Parcel
Off -Site Parking Opportunities
Kick Back
Jack’s
Ju
Parcel
Public Nuisance Question
Recommended Next Steps
Action Items
Parking Management Plan Update
Off-Site Parking Supply
Residential Permit Parking Districts
Parking Management Plan Update
Potential Parking Mitigation Measures:
•Intricate Management of Unassigned Parking Spaces
•Guest Parking Management
•Rigorous Outreach
•Parking Lifts
•Regular Review
Off -Site Parking Supply
Kick Back
Jack’s
Ju
Parcel
Permit Parking District
Municipal Code Section 10.50.020
Designation of permit parking districts
A.Drivers who don’t live in the neighborhood are regularly
occupying on-street parking in the neighborhood.
B.Traffic hazards, environmental pollution, or devaluation of
real property.
C.Support from 75% of the residents within the proposed
district (a signed petition)
D.That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result
into surrounding residential areas
E.No practical alternative solutions
Proposed Permit Parking District
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council:
1.Adopt Resolution No. 2021-100 to establish the
“Estacia Street, et al.” residential permit parking
district on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford
Street, Effen Street and Cambridge Avenue between
Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue;
2.Waive fees for the first issuance of permits for the
proposed residential permit parking district; and
3.Direct staff to continue efforts with the property
management for the Arte apartment complex as
described in this presentation.
Response cont.
•Property Values
•Analysis shows
average of 6%
increase over the
last few years.
•Ability to Sell
•We have similar
districts in many
different areas.
•None have been
requested to be
removed.
Arte
Apartments
Analyzed
Neighborhood
166 Homes
Obtaining Parking Permits
•City will cover the initial cost for five (5) resident
parking permits (exp. July 31, 2025)
•These five (5) permits will be directly mailed to all
addresses within the newly formed district.
•Permits can be replaced if lost
•Costs
•$10 –First permit
•$2 –Each additional permit
•Permits are available for guests
DATE:October 20, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:Consideration of Resolutions and Consideration of First Reading of
Ordinance Nos. 986 and 987, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading Approving General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning
Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267), Tentative Parcel Map
(SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree Removal
Permit (DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315),
Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180) and Certification of
Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2020100056) to Allow for the
Development of Two Industrial Warehouse Buildings on Certain Property
Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300
Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of 4th Street and South of 6th
Street; APNS: 0229-283-50 and 51. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-106,
2021-107, 2021-108, 2021-109, 2021-110 & 2021-111) (ORDINANCE
NOS. 986 & 987) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program, and approve General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning Map Amendment
(DRC2020-00267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202),
Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development
Agreement (DRC2021-00180) through the adoption of the attached Resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
The project site totals approximately 91.39 acres and is comprised of two adjacent parcels (APN:
0229-283-50 and 0229-283-51), generally located between Santa Anita Avenue to the west,
Etiwanda Avenue to the east, 4th Street to the south and 6th Street to the north. A rail spur running
east and west borders the property to the north parallel to 6th Street which serves the subject site
and the site to the east, north of the West Valley Detention Center. This rail spur also turns south
into the property, running north and south parallel to the easterly property line. Staff notes that
there is an approximate 40-foot elevation difference between 4th and 6th Streets which spans the
site from north to south, approximately 3,200 feet.
The site is currently improved with two buildings: a large industrial warehouse building addressed
12434 4th Street, totaling approximately 1,431,000 square feet in size and a smaller concrete tilt-
up building addressed 12322 4th Street, totaling approximately 23,240 square feet. Both existing
Page 258
Page 2
9
7
8
buildings were built in 1984, with the larger building serving as a distribution center for Big Lots,
and the smaller building serving as a retail store for Big Lots, until this tenant vacated the site in
February 2020. Most recently, the large warehouse building was occupied by Geodis Logistics as
a temporary distribution facility. This tenant only recently vacated the site in May 2021, but the
facility currently remains viable for warehouse uses. The smaller concrete tilt-up building formerly
housing the Big Lots retail store is currently vacant. The remainder of the project site comprises
landscaped areas, drive aisles, parking areas and trailer parking and loading areas. A portion of
the project site along 6th Street comprises approximately 11 acres of vacant land which was
previously a vineyard. All existing improvements with the exception of the existing rail spur will be
demolished as part of the proposed project.
After the applicant submitted their application, but before it was deemed complete, the City
Council enacted a moratorium on November 4, 2020 to prohibit certain industrial uses while the
City updated its code standards in response to rising interest and significant demand for the
development of new industrial uses and the redevelopment of legacy uses largely located within
the Southeast Industrial Quadrant (SEIQ), an area of the City bounded by Arrow Route to the
north, 4th Street to the south, I-15 Freeway to the west, and the City’s jurisdictional limit line to the
east. Following the expiration of the moratorium on June 30, 2021, the City Council adopted
Ordinance 982 on July 7, 2021, which established new development standards for industrial
projects throughout the City in response to this demand in industrial development. Notably, the
subject project is deemed exempt from Ordinance 982 as the subject development application
had been deemed complete on March 11, 2021, which is prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982.
Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.02.020F.1, “all land use permit applications that are
active and that have been determined by the planning director to be complete before the effective
date of this title, or any amendments thereto, will be processed according to the regulations in
effect when the application was deemed complete.” Thus, as the subject application was deemed
complete prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, it has been analyzed against standards in effect
prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982.
On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project.
Thirteen public comments were received at that meeting, all but one of which were in support of
the project. One resident expressed concerns regarding traffic, air quality and other environmental
concerns. In addition to these comments, Commissioners inquired about the availability for
electric vehicle charging stations, the completion of the 6th Street at-grade crossing, whether solar
panels would be required, clarification on the proposed community benefit fee, whether the project
would generate sales tax, and how the project might impact air quality and greenhouse gas
emissions. After considering staff’s responses to these various questions and deliberating on the
application, the Commission voted unanimously (5 in favor, 0 against) to recommend that the City
Council approve the project.
For a full analysis and discussion of the proposed project, which includes discussion on
compliance with development standards and architecture, please reference the September 22,
2021, Planning Commission Staff Report and Meeting Minutes which is included with this report
as Attachment 16.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, proposes the construction of two new
speculative industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 2,175,000 square feet
combined on property currently addressed as 12322 and 12434 4th Street. The project requires
the demolition of existing structures described above. The proposed project includes the
construction of one new north-south street which will connect 4th Street and 6th Street which will
Page 259
Page 3
9
7
8
be known as “Catherine Bridge Place,” in honor of Catherine Vail Bridge, a longtime resident who
served in World War II as a Women Airforce Service Pilot (WASP) and who was a critical
proponent of the City’s incorporation.
Entitlements Required for Proposed Development: The project requires a General Plan
Amendment, a Zoning Map Amendment, a Tentative Parcel Map, a Design Review and a Tree
Removal Permit. Further, the applicant proposes to enter into a Development Agreement with the
City, which requires the review and approval of an ordinance by the City Council and which
includes a variety of provisions intended to off-set any adverse impacts the project may cause
that are not otherwise mitigated through CEQA. Lastly, the applicant is also requesting the
approval of a Minor Use Permit in anticipation of the building being utilized as a Large
Distribution/Fulfillment Center.
General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213): Currently, the general plan land use designation
across the project site is split between General Industrial (GI) and Heavy Industrial (HI). The
applicant has applied for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the general plan land use of
the entire project site as General Industrial (GI), thereby eliminating the HI land use designation
from the project area. Staff notes that the City is currently processing a comprehensive general
plan update, known as “PlanRC.” It is presently anticipated that the PlanRC general plan update
will redesignate this site as “Industrial Employment,” a land use designation which is intended to
facilitate the heaviest industrial uses permitted within the City, including but not limited to, large
distribution and logistics facilities, certain types of e-commerce uses and other uses which are
similar to those currently permitted within the Heavy Industrial (HI) land use designation. However,
the proposed GI designation currently allows for the potential warehouse uses proposed for the
Project site, including large distribution/fulfillment centers. Therefore, the Project would be
consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan as amended by the proposed application.
Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267): Similar to the split land use designation, the site is
also split between the Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment (IE) zoning districts. As noted
previously, prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, the Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment
districts were referred to as the General Industrial and Heavy Industrial districts, respectively. The
applicant has requested that the project area be re-zoned to the NI District, which is similar to the
GI zoning district in place prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982. Given that the NI zoning district
is consistent with the prior GI zoning district and allows a similar range of uses, the proposed new
NI zoning would be consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan, as amended to reflect
a GI land use designation throughout the site.
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271): As mentioned, the project includes a request to approve
a Tentative Parcel Map to consolidate the two existing parcels within the project area and
subdivide them into two new lots, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. Parcel 1 proposes an area of
approximately 55 acres with street frontage along 4th Street and Catherine Bridge Place and
Parcel 2 proposes an area of approximately 30 acres with street frontage along 6th Street and
Catherine Bridge Place. Staff has reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map and has determined that it
complies with the relevant development standards, subject to certain conditions of approval.
Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-00266): Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.16.080 as
written prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, a tree removal permit is required to permit the
removal of a heritage tree which meets at least one of the following criteria:
1. All eucalyptus windrows; or
2. Any tree in excess of 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height
(DBH) of 20 inches or more as measured 4 ½ feet from ground level; or
Page 260
Page 4
9
7
8
3. Multi-trunk trees having a total diameter at breast height (DBH) of 30 inches or more as
measured 4 ½ feet from ground level; or
4. A stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival;
or
5. Any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the planning
director because of age, size, condition, location or aesthetic qualities.
589 trees exist onsite which include 125 heritage trees. The project will result in the removal of
464 non-heritage trees and 101 heritage trees. Thus, a tree removal permit is required. 24 existing
heritage trees will remain in place. In addition to these heritage trees remaining in place, and
pursuant to tree replacement requirements established in the Development Code, the project will
also result in 712 onsite trees, including 229 new street trees and 107 replacement heritage trees.
Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315): While the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map
Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review and Tree Removal Permit are exempt from
Ordinance 982, these applications did not address the potential uses/tenants for the project
because the project is being building on a speculative basis. Therefore, no pending use permit
application was deemed complete prior to the effective date of Ordinance 982, and future uses
by tenants who occupy the building will be subject to new standards under Ordinance 982. Thus,
the applicant is requesting the review and approval of a Minor Use Permit subject to Development
Code Section Table 17.30.030-1 as amended by Ordinance 982, in order to attract a new tenant
under the use classification of a “Large Distribution/Fulfillment Center.” Development Code
Section 17.32.020.G.3 (modified as part of Ordinance 982) classifies Large Distribution Fulfillment
Centers as “E-Commerce Distribution” and provides the following definition(s) for this use:
E-Commerce Distribution. Activities that involve the buying, selling, and distribution of
products and associated services over the internet or through mobile applications. Products
are transported using freight trucks and stored in warehouses or fulfillment centers to then
be distributed to designated shipping locations using delivery trucks. Includes the following
categories of e-commerce distribution.
a. Distribution/Fulfillment Center. A fulfilment center or similar use’s primary
purpose is storage and distribution (non-sort) of e-commerce products to
consumers or end-users, either directly or through a parcel hub. These facilities
shall have a minimum ceiling height of 24 feet.
1.Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large. A distribution/fulfillment center
with a minimum gross floor area over 50,000 square feet.
Pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 as amended by Ordinance 982, a Minor Use Permit is required for
Large Distribution Fulfillment Centers.
Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180): The developer has proposed to enter into a
Development Agreement with the city pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.060.A.1. The
proposed Development Agreement (hereafter referred to as the “Agreement”), includes, but is not
limited to, the following major terms which are summarized below:
The term of the development agreement would initially be six years, with an option for
the applicant to extend the term by nine years upon payment of $2 million.
A requirement for future tenants to designate Rancho Cucamonga as the point of sale
for the material handling equipment used in Project’s operations;
A requirement that the developer shall pay a “Community Benefit Fee,” in order to
address the Project’s expected impacts on affordable housing demand, future
greenhouse gas emissions, fire protection services, environmental justice and related
Page 261
Page 5
9
7
8
impacts typically associated with large warehouse development. The amount of the
Community Benefit Fee to be paid by the developer totals $9 million dollars paid to the
city in four installments up to the fifth year of operations of Buildings 1 and 2, with the
first installment of $3 million to be paid when grading permits are pulled. The applicant
may receive a refund of up to $3 million if a project tenant generates a certain amount
of sales tax to the City;
A requirement that the developer complete certain traffic improvements involving
improvements to signal timing and restriping and pay a “Fair Share” contribution to the
City’s Industrial Area Traffic Improvement fund in the amount of $37,089;
A requirement that the developer will pay for, and construct to city standards, a new
public street (”Catherine Bridge Place”), along the east side of the project site, which will
run north-south and connect 4th Street and 6th Street;
A requirement that the developer will contribute $1 million as an in-lieu fee, and work in
good faith to assist the city in obtaining approval from the California Public Utilities
Commission to permit and construct an At-Grade crossing at 6th Street;
CEQA Determination: Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2020100056), has been prepared for this project. The intent of this
EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed project and identify
feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these
impacts. A summary of all of the project-related impacts and the recommended mitigation
measures is provided in the Final EIR. The following summarizes key points in the environmental
review process:
Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting: The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as
public notification that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible
agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the
document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the
purpose of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the
scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping meeting is to receive public testimony on those issues
that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as it relates to the project and environment.
Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting was prepared for the
project and circulated on October 2, 2020 to the State Clearinghouse (SCH No. 2020100056),
public agencies, Native American tribes, those interested parties who had previously requested
notification and all property owners within 660 feet of the subject site. The notice advertising the
NOP and the public scoping meeting was also published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on
October 2, 2020 and made publicly available on the city’s website. the Public Scoping Meeting
was held virtually over Zoom on October 15, 2020. No members of the public or any interested
party provided comments at the Public Scoping Meeting. The public comment period to respond
to the NOP closed on November 2, 2020 and comment letters were received from California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Transportation, Native American
Heritage Commission, Southcoast Air Quality Management District, and Inland Empire Biking
Alliance. Written responses to all significant environmental issues raised were prepared and made
available in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).
AB 52 and SB 18 Compliance: Notification in accordance with AB 52 was sent on July 20, 2021,
to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have required notification by the city. Notification
in accordance with SB 18 was sent out to twelve tribal communities on August 24, 2020. One
tribe (Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation) requested consultation. In response to
this request, staff held a conference call with the tribe on November 4, 2020, at which point
representatives of this tribe requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA
Page 262
Page 6
9
7
8
document requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving activities. Additional comments
were provided by Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation in writing which have been
included as mitigations. In addition to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, the
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) also responded with comments though they did
not request consultation. Rather the SMBMI provided language which they requested “be made
a part of the project/permit/plan conditions.” Accordingly, language from SMBMI has been
incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Thus, the CEQA
document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures.
Draft EIR Preparation and Circulation: Following the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting, a DEIR
was prepared and was distributed to all Responsible and Trustee agencies, and individuals who
had requested to review the DEIR. The DEIR was distributed for a 45-day public review period on
May 7, 2021 with the comment period concluding on June 21, 2021. A Notice of Availability
including electronic links to the DEIR and all technical appendices was posted at the County,
published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, mailed to all property owners within 660 feet,
interested parties requesting such notification and posted on the city’s website on May 7, 2021.
Further, and also on May 7, 2021, the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided to the
Office of Planning and Research via the online “CEQAnet” portal for distribution to Responsible
and Trustee agencies and hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided
for public review at the following locations:
Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730;
Paul A Biane Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739;
Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Comments were received from Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, Attorneys at Law, on behalf
of California’s Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARECA),” the California Air Resources Board
(CARB), and from an individual resident, Mark Rush. Written responses to all significant
environmental issues raised were prepared and made available in the Final EIR (FEIR). Staff
notes that two additional comment letters were received from Blum Collins, Attorneys at Law, on
behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and Mitchell Tsai, Attorney at Law, on
behalf of Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters. Both of these letters were withdrawn by the
commenters, with each noting that the Project developer had sufficiently addressed their
concerns. These comment letters, responses to comments and the commenter’s withdrawal
letters are included with this staff report as Attachments 3 and 4.
The administrative DEIR, FEIR, technical appendices and other environmental documents can
be referenced on the City‘s website accessed here: Bridge Development CEQA Documents
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP): In compliance with CEQA, a monitoring
program has been prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted
mitigation measure or project design feature that reduces the significance level of a particular
impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure.
Findings of Fact in Support of Determinations Related to Significant Environmental Impacts: The
EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation
measures, impacts associated with the project would remain less than significant. No significant
and unavoidable impact was identified; thus, it is determined that no Statement of Overriding
Consideration is required to be adopted.
Page 263
Page 7
9
7
8
Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement provided in Chapter 17.124 of the
Development Code. As an industrial development, this project would typically include artwork that
has a minimum value that meets or exceeds one dollar per square foot. While the valuation to
satisfy the public art requirement would be approximately $2,175,000 (as it is based on square
footage of the project), staff notes that pursuant to the proposed development agreement, all but
$200,000 of this amount will be transferred to the proposed community benefit fee. As a condition
of approval for the project, the applicant shall be required to install art on-site at a minimum value
of $200,000, pursuant to Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The applicant has provided a Fiscal Impact Analysis (Kosmont, 2020, rev. 2021), which estimates
that the subject project would produce approximately 1,678 construction jobs and 1,470
permanent jobs. Further, this analysis anticipates that the project would result in estimated annual
General Fund revenues of $599,500. Accounting for anticipated general fund expenditures related
to the project of $196,800, the estimated net fiscal impact to the City is anticipated to be
approximately $402,700 annually.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing
and anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the city with
new industrial warehouse facilities which will attract quality tenants, the project also results in the
construction of a new public street which will improve circulation in the SEIQ by providing an
additional north-south connection between 4th and 6th Streets. The development of the project
will also aide in facilitating the completion of an east-west at-grade crossing at 6th Street, thereby
also improving east-west access throughout the SEIQ.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Attachment 2 - Project Plans
Attachment 3 - Blum Collins Comments, Responses, and Withdrawal Letter
Attachment 4 - Mitchell Tsai Letter Comments, Responses and Withdrawal Letter
Attachment 5 - City Council Resolution - General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213
Attachment 6 - City Council Ordinance No. 986 - Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267
Attachment 7 - City Council Resolution - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271
Attachment 8 - City Council Resolution - Design Review DRC2020-00202
Attachment 9 - City Council Resolution - Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266
Attachment 10- City Council Resolution - Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315
Attachment 11- City Council Ordinance No. 987 - Development Agreement DRC2021-00180
Attachment 12- City Council Resolution – EIR, Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Program
Attachment 13- Design Review Committee Comments
Attachment 14- September 22, 2021 PC Staff Report and Meeting Minutes
Page 264
Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Project Site
4th Street
APN: 0229-283-50 Etiwanda Avenue APN: 0229-283-51
6th Street Santa Anita Avenue 6th Street
4th Street I-15 FreewayAttachment 1Page265
Attachment 2 - Project plans can be accessed through the following link:
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drop
box.com%2Fsh%2Fpy8i3sb3fkd1uty%2FAABUmCWIRChv3Ka3gADChO54a%2FBrid
ge%2520Development%2520Project%3Fdl%3D0%26subfolder_nav_tracking%3D1
&data=04%7C01%7CJasmin.Oriel%40cityofrc.us%7C59f041ae321344b01b8708d9
8f48bf2f%7C4b433582df6c4498ac682ba6de5d8261%7C0%7C0%7C63769836487
9397330%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=j1oSLYtPQhuSO3ExeIOb
lriIwx0INXwZWwt9C%2FTc%2Fvk%3D&reserved=0
or you may Scan QR code for access:
Page 266
1
Attachment 3
Page 267
2
3
4
Page 268
5
4(cont)
Page 269
6
5(cont)
Page 270
7
6(cont)
Page 271
7(cont)
Page 272
8
7(cont)
Page 273
9
8(cont)
Page 274
10
9(cont)
Page 275
10(cont)
Page 276
11
10(cont)
Page 277
12
11(cont)
Page 278
13
12(cont)
Page 279
13(cont)
14
Page 280
14(cont)
Page 281
14(cont)
Page 282
14(cont)
Page 283
14(cont)
Page 284
15
14(cont)
Page 285
15(cont)
Page 286
15(cont)
Page 287
15(cont)
Page 288
1
RESPONSE TO BLUM COLLINS COVER LETTER
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1
This cover letter identifies that comments on the Draft EIR are being provided by Blum Collins, LLP, on
behalf of the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA), provides a summary of the Project,
and transmits comments from Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE). This cover letter also
summarizes the comments by SWAPE; responses to SWAPE comments are provided below. As
requested, notices and information referring to, or relating to, the Project will be provided, consistent
with applicable law. Pursuant to the responses to comments provided below, no further analysis or
recirculation of the Draft EIR is required.
Attachments to the SWAPE comment letter are provided at the end of these responses to comments.
RESPONSE TO SWAPE COMMENT LETTER
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2
The commenter summarizes the project description, no specific comment or request for additional
information is made, therefore no further response is required.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 3
The commenter incorrectly claims that the Draft EIR’s air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas (GHG)
impacts are underestimated and requests preparation of an updated EIR based on the subsequent
comments. This is a summary of the detailed comments provided in the body of the comment letter,
which are addressed responded to in the following responses. Furthermore, on July 7, 2021, Golden
State Environmental Justice Alliance withdrew its comment letter and opposition to the Project and
requested that this letter not be included in the Final EIR and be removed from the public record. Golden
State Environmental Justice Alliance explained that the Project's developer has addressed its concerns
about environmental mitigation. No additional response if required.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4
The commenter summarizes their claim that the emissions calculations using CalEEMod are not
substantiated and are underestimated based on the subsequent comments. This assertion in incorrect
as outlined in the responses to specific comments provided in the responses to comments below.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 5
The commenter correctly summarizes that the Draft EIR’s air quality analysis relies on CalEEMod
2016.3.2 to calculate emissions associated with the Project and that CalEEMod identifies that project-
specific information should be included in the modeling (if known). The commenter claims that changes
have been made to the CalEEMod defaults and that these changes are not substantiated or identified in
Page 289
2
the Draft EIR. To the contrary, the Draft EIR and associated Appendix B1 – Air Quality Impact Analysis
clearly states on Page 42, that “The duration of construction activity was based on information provided
by the Project Applicant.” In this case, site-specific information was provided by the Project Applicant
relative to the Project’s construction schedule.
The commenter goes on to allege that the schedule identified in the Draft EIR and underlying Appendix
B1 – Air Quality Impact Analysis does not differentiate between the “Building Construction/Architectural
Coatings” and somehow dilutes the architectural coatings-related emissions. To the contrary, as the
commenter points out, the actual modeled number of days for architectural coatings is two working-
weeks shorter than the overall duration identified for the vertical construction phase. The reason for this
is that the modeling accounts for the fact that during the first two working-weeks of vertical
construction, there would be no architectural coatings required. It is also important to note that the
schedule presented in the Draft EIR and associated technical analysis is a summary of a lengthy and more
complicated construction process with various construction activities occurring for both buildings. The
“building construction” category includes various construction activities that require architectural
coatings, including, but not limited to: painting of screen walls, trusses and ledgers, the interior and
exterior of warehouse buildings; striping; caulking; etc. Furthermore, the Draft EIR and underlying
technical analysis conservatively assumes that both Building 1 and Building 2 could be constructed and
painted concurrently, which likely overstates the potential impacts associated with the vertical
construction phase of the Project since the building construction would be staggered. For this Project,
the schedule that was provided by the Developer and its contractor, reasonably assumed 190 days for
all architectural coatings. As such, the analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis is correct
and no changes to the Draft EIR are needed.
It should also be noted that the Project Applicant is voluntarily pursuing a LEED certification for the
proposed buildings. As part of this effort low VOC paint (10 grams per liter VOC content) would be used
during construction. This would further reduce the VOC emissions resulting from construction of the
Project and the numbers in the Draft EIR are conservative by not assessing these reductions.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 6
The VOC emission rates assumed in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis were extracted from
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1113, as stated on Page 2 of Appendix
B1 of the Draft EIR. SCAQMD’s Rule 1113, as summarized in Table 1 of the Rule, identifies the current
limit for the Building Envelope as 50 g/l, which is consistent with the analysis contained in the Draft EIR
(screen capture of Table 1 below); and, establishes a VOC content limits for the “building envelope”
coating category, which is appropriate to use for the Project because the primary painting activities
would be for the physical interior and exterior structure (walls), which constitute the “building
envelope.” The SCAQMD’s rule also serves as substantial evidence because SCAQMD is the applicable
jurisdiction governing air quality in the Project’s region. As such, the analysis in the Draft EIR and
supporting technical analysis is correct and no changes to the Draft EIR are needed. Additionally, as
discussed above, the Project Applicant is voluntarily pursuing a LEED certification for the proposed
Page 290
3
buildings. As part of this effort low VOC paint (10 grams per liter VOC content) would be used during
construction. This would further reduce the VOC emissions resulting from construction of the Project.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 7
The commenter incorrectly identifies that the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis includes
unsubstantiated changes to the vendor and worker trip numbers. Again, as stated on Page 41 of
Appendix B1 of the Draft EIR, “It should be noted that for Vendor Trips, specifically, CalEEMod only assigns
Vendor Trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all phases of
construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for Vendor Trips have been adjusted based on a ratio of the
total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity.” Furthermore, the adjustments
made to the Worker trips actually results in more daily worker trips due to the overlapping assumed for
vertical building construction and architectural coating activity. As noted, the Draft EIR and supporting
technical analysis clearly substantiate the change made since vendor trips are not assigned by default to
every phase in CalEEMod. Lastly, the reason there are changes made to the worker and vendor trips also
has to do with the fact that CalEEMod arbitrarily assigns worker and vendor trips to any phase of
construction modeled in CalEEMod as a “building construction” phase type. In this instance, the
adjustments shown in the CalEEMod output referencing “Building Construction” are actually associated
with the Utilities/Infrastructure Construction Phase, which was modeled in CalEEMod using the “Building
Construction” phase type, since there is no specific “Utilities/Infrastructure Construction Phase” type. It
is appropriate to change the defaults in this instance, since the defaults would treat the
Utilities/Infrastructure Construction Phase as a typical vertical building construction phase. As such, the
analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis is correct and no changes to the Draft EIR are
needed.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 8
The commenter incorrectly asserts that energy use reduction assumptions used in CalEEMod are
unsubstantiated. CalEEMod defaults are based on the prior 2016 Title 24 standards. As noted in the Draft
EIR and supporting technical appendices (Air Quality, GHG and Energy), the 2019 version of Title 24 which
became effective on January 1, 2020 results in approximately 30% less energy demand for non-
residential buildings compared to the 2016 Title 24 standards, as summarized in the 2019 Building Energy
Page 291
4
Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions 1 (published March 2018). It is therefore appropriate to
reduce the CalEEMod defaults by 30% to account for mandatory compliance with the regulation. The
commenter provides no substantial evidence as to why these reductions are improper, or that if the
reductions had not been taken, the EIR analysis and conclusions would have to be revised to render a
new significant impact. As such, the analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis is correct
and no changes to the Draft EIR are needed.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 9
The commenter incorrectly asserts truck trip generation rates have been underestimated. The source of
the vehicle mix is not from the ITE Trip Generation Manual but from the ITE Trip Generation Supplement,
which includes additional data on truck trip generation for 50 land uses (Appendix C: Truck Trips as
Percent of Total Vehicle Trips), which is provided in Appendix C of this Final EIR. There is no weekday
daily truck mix for the high-cube fulfillment center (non-sort) land use, as such, the PM to daily truck mix
percentage relationship for high-cube fulfillment center (sort) land use from the ITE Trip Generation
Supplement was calculated and a similar relationship was applied to determine the high-cube fulfillment
center (non-sort) daily truck mix. Based on this PM-to-daily ratio (3% daily over 2% PM or 1.5 x PM%),
the daily truck percentage calculated for the non-sort facilities was 10.5% (7% PM trucks x 1.5 = 10.5%
trucks for daily). For high-cube cold storage warehouse uses Appendix C identifies a daily truck
percentage of 35% or 2.120 x 35% = 0.742. Similarly, for high-cube fulfillment center (non-sort) uses a
daily truck percentage of 10.5% or 1.81 x 10.5% = 0.19. The trip generation calculations (including truck
trips) and associated mobile-source emissions are therefore not understated and have been calculated
following industry standards. As such, the analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis is
correct and no changes to the Draft EIR are needed.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 10
The Draft EIR’s conclusion that the Project’s operational air quality impact would be less than significant
is correct and the City appropriately considered the existing conditions at the Project site as part of its
environmental baseline. The existing conditions here reflect the existing warehouse buildings on the
Project site that were occupied by warehouse uses for over 37 years, and were occupied during
preparation of the Draft EIR. First, the existing buildings are intact and can be occupied by a warehouse
use at any time without any new entitlements or approvals from the City. The existing buildings were
occupied by warehouse and retail uses (Pic ‘n Save and Big Lots) from approximately 1983 to February
29, 2020. The existing buildings were briefly vacant from March 1, 2020 to October 29, 2020, at which
time they were re-occupied by another warehouse user (Geodis). The NOP was published on October
2, 2020, only 27 days before the existing buildings were re-occupied by Geodis. The EIR was therefore
prepared while the existing buildings were occupied and their occupied use is a reasonable
environmental baseline to compare the Project impacts against as it was the actual conditions during
preparation of the EIR.
1 https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020 -03/Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ_ada.pdf
Page 292
5
The Commenter cites to a portion of CEQA Guidelines section 15125(a) but fails to cite to the rest of
Guidelines section 15125(a)(1), which provides that “Generally, the lead agency should describe physical
environmental conditions as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice
of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and
regional perspective. Where existing conditions change or fluctuate over time, and where necessary to
provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the project's impacts, a lead agency may
define existing conditions by referencing historic conditions, or conditions expected when the project
becomes operational, or both, that are supported with substantial evidence. In addition, a lead agency
may also use baselines consisting of both existing conditions and projected future conditions that are
supported by reliable projections based on substantial evidence in the record.”
The fact that the existing buildings were actually re-occupied with a warehouse use during the time the
EIR was prepared is evidence that the buildings could be reoccupied and supports the use of the existing
conditions baseline here. Additionally, this vacancy occurred at the beginning of the COVID pandemic,
which further substantiates that the vacant condition does not represent an accurate baseline. Because
traffic counts were not available for Big Lots, the Draft EIR used conservatively low ITE trip generation
rates for a warehouse use. For energy and water use, the Draft EIR used data from historic operations
of the Big Lots building. The City’s use of the existing conditions baseline is supported by substantial
evidence and the fact that the existing buildings happened to be vacant for a brief 8-month period during
which the NOP was released over 37 years of operation is immaterial to the appropriateness of
operational conditions being the proper baseline.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 11
The commenter asserts that there would be a significant air quality impact when not taking into
consideration emissions from existing uses. As identified in Response to Comment 9, the Draft EIR and
supporting technical analyses correctly take credit for the existing uses onsite. As such, no significant
impact would occur. The analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis is correct and no
changes to the Draft EIR are needed.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 12
The commenter attempts to provide updated modeling of the Project’s construction-related emissions
of VOC and NOx based on CalEEMod defaults and not based on the information included in the Draft EIR.
However, the commenter provides no substantial evidence to support the use of CalEEMod defaults
when, as explained above, there are more accurate and appropriate Project specific inputs available. To
the contrary, Response to Comments 4 through 6 above, which address the CalEEMod assumptions,
refute the commenters assertions and support the fact that the Draft EIR and supporting technical
studies are correct, and no significant impact would occur from implementation of the Project, with
adherence to regulatory requirements and implementation of mitigation measures identified in the
Draft EIR to reduce NOx emissions. As such, the analysis in the Draft EIR and supporting technical analysis
is correct and no changes to the Draft EIR are needed. Additionally, refer to Response to Comment 13
Page 293
6
below, which addresses expanded Draft EIR mitigation measure (MM) 2-2, resulting in a further
reduction in NOx emissions during construction.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 13
The commenter incorrectly asserts that it is inappropriate to take credit for the existing uses onsite when
considering the Project’s impacts related to GHG emissions. This issue is addressed in Response to
Comment 9, above.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 14
The commenter summarizes the Project’s GHG emissions conclusion, restating data presented in the
Draft EIR that the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year.
2. The commenter also summarizes that the Draft EIR relies upon a separate and independent basis of
consistency with CARB’s Scoping Plan, the City’s Sustainability Community Action Plan, and SCAG’s
Connect SoCal in order to conclude the Project would result in a less than significant GHG impact. While
2 Note that the commenter does not question or challenge the City’s well-established use of the
SCAQMD’s threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year for industrial projects which is an independent basis for
the City to determine that GHG impacts are less than significant. This numeric threshold is supported by
direct testimony from SCAQMD expert staff who stated that a warehouse project would be subject to
the industrial project 10,000 MT CO2e/year GHG threshold. (meeting minutes available here:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-
significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-8/ghg-meeting-8-minutes.pdf?sfvrsn=2). The use
of this threshold was not questioned by CARB, who commented on the Project. In addition, the California
Attorney General indicates that the 10,000 metric ton threshold is appropriate for warehouse facilities
such as this Project (Brief of Amici Curiae the Attorney General and The California Air Resources Board
in Support of Plaintiffs and Respondents Albert Thomas Paulek, et al. and Plaintiffs and Appellants
Laborers International Union of North America, Local 1184, et al.,
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/WLC%20-%20Amicus.pdf). Moreover, the
increase of emissions above baseline caused by the Project is 2,478.53 MT CO2e/year which is below the
SCAQMD’s threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year for mobile sources from local agency land use development
approvals for projects such as commercial, residential, and mixed-use projects that is also applicable to
the mobile sources emissions from trucks and cars accessing the proposed project. (see i.e. Presentation
from last working group meeting, available here: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-
meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2 and spreadsheet calculating emissions
from residential and commercial project based on trip rates http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-
meeting-13/ghg-meeting-13-individual-emissions-and-capture-rates.xls?sfvrsn=2 – emissions are based
on trip rates)
Page 294
7
the Draft EIR presents both a comparison to a numeric threshold and consistency with plans analysis,
the City notes that the Appendix G threshold questions are presented as an “or” and either analysis is a
valid, independent method to determine the significance of the Project’s GHG impacts. As explained in
the Draft EIR, the Project would have a less than significant GHG impact under either of the questions
and basis by itself is an appropriate basis for the City to analyze GHG impacts. The commenter then
incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR’s GHG analysis is incorrect and provides five reasons. A specific
response to each of the five reasons is as follows:
Reason 1: Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions
The commenter incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR’s quantitative GHG analysis is incorrect and based
on unsubstantiated quantitative analysis of emissions. The commenter refers to comments previously
made (specifically Comments 4 through 10) as the support for this assertion. As provided herein,
Responses to Comments 4 through 10 refute all of the allegations of incorrect and unsubstantiated
modeling and analysis assumptions.
Reason 2: Incorrect Analysis of GHG emissions
The commenter incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR inappropriately takes credit for the existing
operational emissions. Refer to Response to Comment 9, above, which addresses this comment.
Reason 3: Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact
The Draft EIR correctly identifies that no potentially significant GHG impact would occur. Refer to
Response to Comment 12, above, which addresses the less than significant impact conclusion. In
addition, notwithstanding the Project’s less than significant GHG impacts, in response to a comment
letter from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) (Comment Letter C of the Final EIR), the Project
Applicant has voluntarily agreed to incorporate additional mitigation measures that would further
reduce the Project’s less than significant GHG emissions impacts. Specifically, MM 2-1 included in Draft
EIR Section 4.2, Air Quality, has been expanded (as shown in bold underline) to include additional
construction-related mitigation requirements, and new MM 2-2 includes operational requirements.
MM 2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit issuance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
shall verify that the following applicable notes are included on the grading plans and
building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with these
notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction-site by City of Rancho
Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be
specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
• During construction activity, Project construction contractors shall ensure that
off-road diesel construction equipment complies with applicable California Air
Resources Board (CARB) emissions standards or equivalent and shall ensure that
all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer’s specifications.
Page 295
8
• The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier III certified or
better, by construction phase as shown:
○ Demolition/Crushing:
Boom Lift
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Crusher
Skid Steer
○ Utilities/Infrastructure:
Trencher
○ Building Construction:
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Welders
○ Paving:
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers
○ Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
• The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier IV Final
certified or better, by construction phase as shown:
○ Demolition/Crushing:
Breakers
Excavators
Generator Sets
Rubber Tired Dozers
○ Grading:
Crawler Tractors
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
○ Utilities/Infrastructure:
Excavators
Page 296
9
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
○ Building Construction
Cranes
Crawler Tractors
Laser Screed
Scissor Loaders/Backhoes
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
• Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to two minutes
and electrical hook ups shall be provided to support use of zero and near-zero
construction equipment and tools whenever feasible.
• Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate
compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction shall be
electric powered, provided that it is commercially available, which may be
plug-in (electric) or battery powered.
• Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material hauling during construction shall
meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency/California Air Resource
Board truck engine standard for Model Year 2014 or later.
MM 2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following operational requirements in the
final building design or stipulate the operational requirements for building
occupants, as appropriate:
Project Design
• Make truck dock positions EV-ready by installing conduits at truck dock
positions for future accommodation of light-duty and/or heavy-duty electric
trucks and charging stations.
Lease Agreement and Owner-Occupant Requirements
• Those loading docks used by trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU)
as determined by a cold storage tenant shall be equipped with electrical
hookups (applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only).
• TRUs entering the Project site shall be plug-in capable (applicable to cold
storage tenant lease agreements only).
• On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall be no longer than 15 minutes
(applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only).
Page 297
10
• Service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet
jacks) shall be powered by alternative fuels, electrical batteries or other
alternative/non-diesel fuels (e.g., propane) that do not emit diesel
particulate matter, and that are low or zero emission.
• Trucks and support equipment shall not idle longer than five minutes while
on site.
Reason 4: Failure to Consider Performance-Based Standards Under CARB’s Scoping Plan
The comment indicates that the Project would not meet the VMT Per Capita as anticipated in CARB’s
2017 Scoping Plan and therefore, the less-than-significant determination in the Draft EIR is incorrect and
unsubstantiated. However, the analysis as presented in this comment is inaccurate for several reasons,
which leads to the comment’s inaccurate assumption of Project-related Per Capita VMT rates.
First CARB itself describes the document relied upon by the commenter as “non-binding technical
information that acts as an optional aide to local governments and lead agencies.”3 The City was
therefore well within its discretion when it opted not to rely on statewide per capita VMT values.
Second, the per capita analysis in the comment takes the light-duty vehicles- (LDV) associated VMT in
the State and divides it by the total population of the State, to reach the Per Capita values. The Project
VMT per Service Population as disclosed in the DEIR is based on the total Project generated VMT which
includes home-work, commercial-work, commercial-customer trips and divides that total by only the
number anticipated employees of the Project.
By contrast, the State LDA-associated VMT used by the commenter included all of the home-work, home-
shopping, commercial-work, commercial-customer trips and divides it by the total population consisting
of all of the residents, employees, and customers in the State. The Project’s VMT per Service Population
is based only on the employees and appropriately does not include any residential and non-employee-
based population. This is the primary reason why the State VMT Per Capita estimates cited by the
commenter appear to be lower than the Project-generated VMT per Service Population. This is
underscored by the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPRs) Technical Advisory on Evaluating
Transportation Impacts in CEQA (see page 5 of the Technical Advisory) which states that in order to have
an accurate comparison of VMT estimates, the same model and methodology used to determine the
thresholds should be used to provide project-generated VMT.
The City adopted its VMT methodology and thresholds based on consistency with SB 743 and a goal of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, the City found that “[t]he intent of SB 743 is to promote
infill development and reduce GHGs by promoting development in VMT- efficient areas (i.e., Cities that
have VMT per service population below the County average). As identified above, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga land uses are currently more efficient on average from a VMT per service population
3 https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/carb-2017-scoping-plan-identified-vmt-reductions-
and-relationship-state-climate
Page 298
11
perspective than the average of the County of San Bernardino as a whole; therefore, comparisons to the
City average are more in line with the legislative intent of SB 743.” City Council staff report related to
resolution 2020-056 is available online here:
https://rcdocs.cityofrc.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=568102&dbid=0&repo=RanchoCucamonga.
Reason 5: Failure to Consider Performance-Based Standards Under SCAG’s RTP/SCS
The commenter incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR did not consider performance-based standards
under SCAG’s RTP/SCS. First, there is no requirement to consider any numeric performance-based
standards for purposes of determining a potential impact. The Draft EIR correctly relies on a robust
qualitative analysis of the Project’s consistency with SCAG’s RTP/SCS (Draft EIR pages 4.10-10 through
4.10-27), consistent with applicable CEQA requirements.
As detailed on page 4.7-14 of Section 4.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the Draft EIR, the total mobile
source emissions from passenger vehicles for the Project are 6,388.45 MTCO2e annually (net mobile
emissions are 2,210 MTCO2e annually). The Project-related Service Population, as stated above,
includes only employees of the Project so it is inaccurate to divide the total passenger-car emissions by
only the employee trips because the GHG analysis assumes other vehicle trips to the Project site
(customers, guests, etc.) in addition to those of employees. This results in an overestimate of per capita
emissions and the commenter’s comparison to the SB 375 per capita emissions is therefore flawed
because the service population used by SCAG includes residential and non-employee-based population
in addition to the employee-based population.
Second, the commenter selectively identifies a VMT per capita benchmark specifically for passenger and
light duty automobiles and attempts to conflate consistency with unadopted numeric per capita targets.
This approach is again flawed because it focuses only on passenger and light duty vehicles and associated
emissions, and ignores all other emissions categories, which are correctly evaluated in the Draft EIR.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT 15
The commenter incorrectly asserts that the Project would have potentially significant air quality and
GHG impacts and that additional mitigation should be required. As summarized in the Draft EIR and
supporting technical studies, the Project would not result in a significant air quality (after
implementation of identified regulatory requirements and mitigation for construction-related emission),
or GHG emissions impact. As such, there is no nexus to require mitigation and no mitigation is required.
Notwithstanding, the City and the Project Applicant have agreed to new expanded MM 2-1 and new MM
2-2, identified in Response to Comment 13 above, to further reduce the less than significant air quality
and GHG emissions resulting from the Project. These measures are based on recommendations provided
by the commenter in this comment, and CARB.
Page 299
ATTACHMENTS TO SWAPE COMMENT LETTER
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
July 7, 2021
Members of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Members of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project (SCH Number: 2020100056)
Dear Members of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Commission:
On behalf of the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance ("GSEJA"), I am writing to you regarding the
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project ("Project"), which proposes to remove 1,454,240 square feet of existing
buildings and develop two new buildings totaling approximately 2,175,000 square feet.
GSEJA is withdrawing its comment letter and opposition to the Project and requests that the letter not be
included in the Final EIR and be removed from the public record. The Project's developer has addressed GSEJA's
concerns about environmental mitigation.
Sincerely,
�geoi
D' ector
Page 493
Page 1
1
Attachment 4
Page 494
Page 2
2
1(cont)
Page 495
Page 3
2(cont)
Page 496
Page 4
2(cont)
Page 497
Page 5
3
2(cont)
Page 498
Page 6
4
Page 499
Page 7
4(cont)
Page 500
Page 8
5
4(cont)
Page 501
Page 9
5(cont)
Page 502
Page 10
5(cont)
Page 503
Page 11
6
5(cont)
Page 504
Page 12
7
6(cont)
Page 505
Page 13
8
7(cont)
Page 506
Page 14
9
8(cont)
Page 507
Page 15
10
9(cont)
Page 508
Page 16
11
10(cont)
Page 509
Page 17
12
13
14
11(cont)
Page 510
Page 18
15
16
14(cont)
Page 511
Page 19
17
16(cont)
Page 512
Page 20
17(cont)
18
Page 513
Page 21 Page 514
Page 22
19
Page 515
Page 23
19(cont)
Page 516
Page 24
19(cont)
Page 517
Page 25
19(cont)
Page 518
Page 26
19(cont)
Page 519
Page 27 Page 520
Page 28 Page 521
Page 29 Page 522
Page 30 Page 523
Page 31 Page 524
Page 32 Page 525
Page 33 Page 526
Page 34 Page 527
Page 35 Page 528
Page 36 Page 529
Page 37 Page 530
Page 38 Page 531
Page 39 Page 532
Page 40 Page 533
Page 41 Page 534
Page 42 Page 535
Page 43 Page 536
Page 44 Page 537
Page 45 Page 538
Page 46 Page 539
Page 47 Page 540
Page 48 Page 541
Page 49
20
Page 542
Page 50
21
Page 543
Page 51
22
Page 544
Page 52
23
24
Page 545
Page 53
24(cont)
Page 546
Page 54
24(cont)
Page 547
Page 55
25
Page 548
Page 56 Page 549
Page 57 Page 550
Page 58 Page 551
1
Response to Mitchell M. Tsai (on behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of
Carpenters)
Responses to Main Comment Letter
1. This comment identifies that comments on the Draft EIR are being provided by Mitchell M.
Tsai, Attorney at Law, on behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
(Southwest Carpenters), and provides a summary of the Project and the Southwest
Carpenters’ interest in the Project. The statement of interest is acknowledged. The City will
respond to all comments on the Draft EIR and Final EIR consistent with applicable law.
Notices and information referring to, or relating to, the EIR will also be provided consistent
with applicable law. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental
analysis provided in the Draft EIR, thus, no further response is required. Furthermore, on
July 14, 2021, The Office of Mitchell M. Tsai withdrew its comment letter dated June 21,
2021, on the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Draft EIR and respectfully requested
that the letter not be included in the Final EIR.
2. The commenter recommends that the City consider utilizing skilled and trained workforce
policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate
greenhouse gas (GHG), air quality and transportation impacts, and that the Project should
be built to standards that exceed existing code requirements. This comment also refers to
the comment letter provided by a technical consultant, which is included in Exhibit A of the
comment letter; however, the letter included in Exhibit A does not specifically comment on
the Draft EIR. The recommendations provided in this comment are acknowledged. As
noted in the Draft EIR, potentially significant impacts of the Project have been adequately
addressed in Draft EIR Sections 4.1 through 4.15, including air quality, GHG, and
transportation (vehicle miles traveled [VMT]) impacts, which are addressed in this
comment. As evaluated in the Draft EIR, the Project’s impact would be less than significant
or less than significant with mitigation.
Notwithstanding the Project’s less than significant impacts, in response to a comment letter
from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Project Applicant has voluntarily
agreed to incorporate additional mitigation measures during construction and operation that
would further reduce the Project’s less than significant impacts (refer to modified MM 2-1
and new MM 2-2 below; new text is presented as bold and underlined). The new and
expanded mitigation requirements have been incorporated into the Final EIR and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project.
MM 2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit issuance, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga shall verify that the following applicable notes are included on the
grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to
ensure compliance with these notes and permit periodic inspection of the
construction-site by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm
compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to
prospective construction contractors.
• During construction activity, Project construction contractors shall ensure
that off-road diesel construction equipment complies with applicable
Page 552
2
California Air Resources Board (CARB) emissions standards or
equivalent and shall ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.
• The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier III
certified or better, by construction phase as shown:
○ Demolition/Crushing:
Boom Lift
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Crusher
Skid Steer
○ Utilities/Infrastructure:
Trencher
○ Building Construction:
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Welders
○ Paving:
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers
○ Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
• The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier IV
Final certified or better, by construction phase as shown:
○ Demolition/Crushing:
Breakers
Excavators
Generator Sets
Rubber Tired Dozers
○ Grading:
Crawler Tractors
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
○ Utilities/Infrastructure:
Excavators
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
○ Building Construction
Cranes
Crawler Tractors
Laser Screed
Page 553
3
Scissor Loaders/Backhoes
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
• Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to two
minutes and electrical hook ups shall be provided to support use of
zero and near-zero construction equipment and tools whenever
feasible.
• Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g.,
plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project
construction shall be electric powered, provided that it is
commercially available, which may be plug-in (electric) or battery
powered.
• Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material hauling during
construction shall meet the United States Environmental Protection
Agency/California Air Resource Board truck engine standard for
Model Year 2014 or later.
MM 2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following operational
requirements in the final building design or stipulate the operational
requirements for building occupants, as appropriate:
Project Design
• Make truck dock positions EV-ready by installing conduits at
truck dock positions for future accommodation of light-duty
and/or heavy-duty electric trucks and charging stations.
Lease Agreement and Owner-Occupant Requirements
• Those loading docks used by trucks with transport refrigeration
units (TRU) as determined by a cold storage tenant shall be
equipped with electrical hookups (applicable to cold storage
tenant lease agreements only).
• TRUs entering the Project site shall be plug-in capable (applicable
to cold storage tenant lease agreements only).
• On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall be no longer than 15
minutes (applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements
only).
• Service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts,
and pallet jacks) shall be powered by alternative fuels, electrical
batteries or other alternative/non-diesel fuels (e.g., propane) that
do not emit diesel particulate matter, and that are low or zero
emission.
Page 554
4
• Trucks and support equipment shall not idle longer than five
minutes while on site.
While this comment provides several recommendations and the commenter and its
technical consultant’s perception of the benefits of using local labor, it does not raise any
issues with the environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR.
3. This comment identifies that review of the Draft EIR and specifically the analysis of
transportation impacts was provided by a technical consultant supporting the commenter.
Responses to the comments received from the technical consultant have been provided
herein, as requested. Attachments to the technical consultant comment letters are
included in Attachment A of this response.
4. This comment incorrectly asserts in its heading that approval of the Project would be in
violation of CEQA. Subsections A and B of this comment summarize CEQA requirements
and caselaw related to analysis of environmental impacts and requirements for
recirculation of a Draft EIR. As noted by commenter, an EIR is meant to “provide public
agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project
is likely to have on the environment and to ‘identify ways that environmental damage can
be avoided or significantly reduced,’”1 which is exactly what the Draft EIR does. While this
comment quotes several provisions of CEQA, the Guidelines, and caselaw, it does not
raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR. As such, no
further response is required.
5. This comment incorrectly asserts that the City must adopt a mandatory finding of
significance that the project may cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings due
to the COVID-19 crisis. Commentor made an identical comment on the Recirculated Draft
EIR for the Victorville CarMax Auto Superstore Project (SCH 2019070975). We
incorporate by reference the response made therein.2 Specifically, it is noted note that
neither provision cited by commenter, CEQA § 21083(b)(3) nor Guidelines § 15065(a)(4)
require the City to analyze the effects of COVID-19 on the general public. The purpose of
CEQA, as noted by commenter, is to analyze the “significant effects of the proposed
project on the environment.”3 The sections cited by commenter, CEQA § 21083(b)(3) and
Guidelines § 15065(a)(4), provide that the lead agency is required to make a mandatory
finding of significance if “the environmental effects of a project will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.” Courts have repeatedly
held that agencies “are not required to analyze the impact of existing environmental
conditions on a project's future users or residents.”4. The Project, in this case, is neither a
source nor a cause of COVID-19 and, as such, exposure to COVID-19 is not a direct or
indirect effect of the Project. Further, the commenter’s source for its statement that
“[r]ecently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community
1 Comment 4, quoting Guidelines § 15002(a)(2).
2 City of Victorville – Victorville CarMax Auto Superstore Project RDEIR (SCH 2019070975), p. 3-44 – 3-93; available
at: https://www.victorvilleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/4578/637381839182670000.
3 CEQA § 21100(b)(1).
4 California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 377.
Page 555
5
spread of COVID-19” was more than a year old at the time of the comment letter. While
this time period may constitute “recent” in other contexts, it represents more than half of
the length of the COVID-19 crisis as a whole, which has been ongoing in the United States
for less than two years. In addition, at the time of the article, no vaccines were yet available
for COVID-19, compared to the time of the comment letter when 60.1% of California
residents have received at least one dose of a vaccine that protects against COVID-19.5
As such, circumstances, including the rate and causes of transmission, have changed
significantly since the date of the article cited by commenter.
The Project will comply with all state and local regulations regarding the prevention of the
transmission of COVID-19 in place at the time of construction and Project operation,
respectively. Commenter’s suggestions regarding additional methods to prevent the
spread of COVID-19 are acknowledged.
6. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR does not include an accurate and
complete Project Description related to the bases for the Draft EIR analysis estimate that
10% of the building will operate as a high-cube cold storage warehouse, and that the
Project has been designed to accommodate a high-cube non-sort fulfillment center. The
comment summarizes CEQA requirements and caselaw related to describing a project.
The City agrees with commenter that a project description must be “accurate, stable, and
finite,” which is exactly what is provided in the Draft EIR. As identified on page 3-9 of the
Draft EIR, different types of high-cube warehouses have various operational
characteristics (e.g., fulfillment centers that can be non-sort or sort facilities, cold storage
warehouses, hours of operations, etc.). The future tenants of the buildings are not
currently known, could not reasonably be known, and were not known when the Draft EIR
was prepared. The Project involves the development of two Class A speculative industrial
buildings that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards, and that can
accommodate a wide variety of users. Each building has been designed to operate
independently. Moreover, a Condition of Approval will be included for the Project limiting
any cold storage to a maximum 10% of building square footage and the Project Applicant
has agreed as part of the proposed Development Agreement that the proposed buildings
would not be operated as sort use fulfillment centers. Therefore, for purposes of analysis
in the Draft EIR, certain assumptions regarding the Projects’ physical characteristics,
operations, and construction activities are made, and are clearly identified in Draft EIR
Section 3.0, Project Description.
The proposed building design/site plan and associated parking layout was the basis for
anticipating that the proposed buildings would operate as non-sort fulfillment centers. The
referenced text on page 3-38 of the Draft EIR is simply acknowledging that based on the
proposed building design/site plan, the Project Applicant anticipates that the proposed
buildings would be operated as high-cube non-sort fulfillment center. As identified on page
3-9 of the Draft EIR, based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Rate 155
for “fulfillment center” a non-sort fulfillment center typically ships large box items that use
more automation than manual sortation, and a sort fulfillment center typically ships out
5 https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-cases-tracking-outbreak/covid-19-vaccines-
distribution/.
Page 556
6
smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means. As provided by the
Guidelines, a conclusion is supported by substantial evidence if there is “enough relevant
information and reasonable inferences … that a fair argument can be made to support a
conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached.” In this case, the
Project buildings, due to the proposed design and parking layout, are proposed to operate
as non-sort fulfillment centers. Notwithstanding the anticipation that based on the current
design the proposed buildings would likely operate as non-sort fulfillment centers, the City
conservatively evaluated Project operations in the Draft EIR as a non-sort fulfillment center
use and as a sort fulfillment center use, where applicable. The supplemental analysis for
a sort fulfillment center is related to impacts based on trip generation (e.g., air quality,
energy, greenhouse gas emissions, off-site traffic noise, and transportation) because a
sort fulfillment center use would be expected to generate an estimated 13,070 actual
vehicle trip-ends per day, and a net increase of 10,038 total vehicle trip-ends per day
(passenger cars and trucks) when taking into consideration daily trips that would be
generated by use of the existing buildings (3,032 actual vehicle trip-ends per day as
discussed in Draft EIR Section 4.13, Transportation). For comparison, the high-cube non-
sort fulfillment center warehouse and high-cube cold storage building operations would
generate 3,472 actual passenger car vehicle trip ends per day, compared to 12,528 actual
passenger car vehicle trip ends per day with the high-cube sort fulfillment center
warehouse use. There would be a minimal difference in truck trip ends per day (536 trips
ends per day with a non-sort warehouse operation compared to 542 trip ends per day with
a sort warehouse operation), and no difference in trip generation for the high-cube cold
storage warehouse use. Therefore, the Draft EIR conservatively analyzes the impacts
resulting from use of the buildings as non-sort fulfillment centers and sort fulfillment
centers ensuring that the potential environmental impacts resulting from operation of the
Project have been adequate analyzed. As noted above, the Project Applicant has agreed
as part of the proposed Development Agreement that the proposed buildings would not
be operated as sort use fulfillment centers. No further analysis is required.
The estimation that 90% of the building square footage would be operated as a high-cube
non-sort fulfillment center warehouse and the remaining 10% would be operated as a high-
cube cold storage warehouse was not based on the building design/site plan. Rather, the
Project Applicant is proposing that a maximum 10% of the Project building square footage
would be occupied by tenants with high-cube cold storage uses, and therefore this was
the maximum amount of cold storage square footage analyzed. In addition, as part of its
Project approvals, the City will condition the Project with a restriction that no more than
10% of the building space be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with the analysis in the Draft EIR. As noted in the Draft EIR and reiterated
herein, because the Project will involve no more than 10% use for cold storage, no
revisions to the Draft EIR project description or associated analyses are required. In
addition, as part of its Project approvals and for purposes of clarification, this operational
characteristic that has already been disclosed in the Draft EIR, will be enforced by the City
through a Condition of Approval that restricts the Project to no more than 10% of the
building space being used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space, consistent with
the analysis in the Draft EIR. As noted in the Draft EIR and reiterated herein, because the
Project will involve no more than 10% use for cold storage as a condition of approval, no
revisions to the Draft EIR project description or associated analyses are required.
Page 557
7
Notwithstanding, for clarification, page 3-9 of the Draft EIR Project Description (1st partial
paragraph) is hereby revised to read as follows:
“…However, for purposes of analysis in this Draft EIR, and based on the proposed
building design/site plan and associated parking layout, it is assumed that 90% of the
building square footage would be operated as a high-cube non-sort fulfillment center
warehouse 6 and the remaining 10% would be operated as a high-cube cold storage
warehouse 7. A Condition of Approval will be included for the Project limiting
any cold storage to a maximum 10% of building square footage.”
Further, prior to the issuance of building permits to construct the proposed buildings, the
Project Applicant would be required to submit construction documents/plans to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for review and approval. Should building design changes be
proposed during subsequent project reviews that are not consistent with the Project
analyzed in the EIR, the City would review the changes in compliance with Section 15162
of the CEQA Guidelines to determine if further environmental review is required, or if the
changes are within the scope of the EIR and no further environmental
review/documentation is needed.
7. This comment summarizes CEQA requirements and caselaw related to mitigation and the
deferral of mitigation. While this comment quotes several provisions of CEQA, the
Guidelines, and caselaw, it does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis
provided in the Draft EIR. As such, no further response is required. Response to Comment
8 provided below addresses comments related to these issues, and specifically mitigation
for impacts to biological resources (tree removal).
8. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR defers development of biological
resources mitigation measures addressing potential impacts associated with the removal
of trees. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, which has been used by the City to establish
thresholds of significance includes various thresholds that are relevant to tree removal.
The analysis for Threshold 3.4 (starting on Draft EIR page 4.3-28) clearly identifies that
the loss of vegetation onsite, including tree removal, has the potential to impact nesting
birds during the breeding season and adherence to regulatory requirements (refer to RR
3-1 and RR 3-2 on pages 4.3-24 through 4.3-26) would ensure that these impacts are less
than significant. RR 3-1 and RR 3-2 outline Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California
Department of Fish and Game Code requirements related to the protection of nesting
birds, and specifically identify how compliance will be accomplished. This analysis is also
cross-referenced under Threshold 3.1 on Draft EIR page 4.3-26, which addresses habitat
modification. As discussed under the analysis for these thresholds, the removal of trees,
relative to their biological resource value, would be less than significant with adherence to
regulatory requirements. Contrary to the assertion made by the commenter, this analysis
6 Fulfillment centers can be categorized as either sort or non-sort facilities. A non-sort fulfillment center typically
ships large box items that use more automation than manual sortation. A sort fulfillment center typically ships out
smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means. (Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Rate 155)
7 A cold storage warehouse has the ability to keep temperature sensitive items in a temperature-controlled
environment.
Page 558
8
does not rely on the compliance with the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance
(Development Code Section 17.80) to determine that impacts are less than significant.
As noted in Guidelines Section 15126.4(a)(1), the “EIR shall describe feasible measures
which could minimize significant adverse impacts.” Impermissible deferral of mitigation
can occur “when an EIR puts off analysis or orders a report without either setting standards
or demonstrating how the impact can be mitigated in the manner described in the EIR.”8
Commenter’s assertion that the Draft EIR’s reliance on the City’s Tree Removal Permit
process constitutes deferred mitigation because the City “does not commit itself to any
specific or binding course of action which is project-specific” is incorrect. As noted in the
Draft EIR, specifically in RR 3-4, cited by commenter, the Project is required to comply
with the City’s Tree Removal Permit process found in Development Code Chapter
17.16.080.9 As further detailed below, Chapter 17.16.080 sets forth specific requirements
and actions for a Tree Removal Permit, including, but not limited to, “[r]eplacement of the
removed tree or trees with tree(s) of species and quantity commensurate with the
aesthetic value of the tree or trees removed.”10 Furthermore, Figure 3-13 of the Draft EIR
sets forth the current site plan, under which 24 existing heritage trees would be protected
in place, and the remaining heritage trees to be removed would be replaced at a 1:1 ratio
with like trees.11 Notwithstanding the level of specificity and detail contained in the Draft
EIR surrounding tree removal, it is also noted that courts have repeatedly found that
compliance with relevant codes and regulations can constitute substantial evidence that
mitigation measures would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.12 As such,
compliance with the City’s Tree Removal Permit process contains a sufficient level of
detail so as to not constitute deferred mitigation.
The Project’s compliance with the City’s regulation for protecting trees is addressed under
Threshold 3.5 (Draft EIR page 4.3-30), including Development Code Sections 17.80 and
Section 17.16.080. The City’s tree removal permit requirements outlined in of the City’s
Development Code is to provide a review process for the removal of heritage trees that
are considered to be a community resource. Development Code Section 17.16.080(D)
identifies that (1) no person, firm, or corporation shall remove, relocate, or destroy any
heritage tree within the city limits, including an applicant for a building permit, without first
obtaining a tree removal permit from the planning director; and (2) no tree removal permit
shall be issued for the removal of any heritage tree on any lot associated with a proposal
for development, unless all discretionary approvals have been obtained from the City.
As part of the CEQA review process, the City required preparation of a detailed tree
inventory. The Tree Inventory Report for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project at
12434 4th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, is provided in Appendix C2 of the Draft
EIR and includes a detailed description of each existing tree within the Project site and
8 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 413, 443
(internal citations omitted).
9 Draft EIR, p. 4.3-26.
10 Development Code Chapter 17.16.080(F)(5)(i).
11 Draft EIR, p. 3-24.
12 See, e.g., Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884, 904; Tracy First v. City of
Tracy (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 912, 933-34.
Page 559
9
within the study area for the 6th Street at-grade crossing. The following information is
provided for each tree, which is identified by number on exhibits and in the tree data
summary matrix: common name, species, number of main trunks, diameter at breast
height, tree height, canopy diameter, health rating, aesthetic rating, and whether or not
the tree is a heritage tree. Where applicable, notes were provided regarding
characteristics of the tree or is location that may be relevant (e.g., limb failure, location
over light poles, etc.). In addition to the biological resource characteristics of the trees and
associated biological resource impacts associated with removal of the trees addressed in
Draft EIR Section 4.3, Biological Resources, as discussed above, the potential visual
impacts associated with removal of trees is addressed in Draft EIR Section 4.1, Aesthetics.
The conceptual landscape plan presented on Figure 3-13 of the Draft EIR (page 3-24)
clearly identifies that based on the current site plan 24 existing heritage trees would be
protected in place, and the remaining heritage trees to be removed would be replaced at
a 1:1 ratio with like trees.
The tree information presented in the Draft EIR is extensive and will assist the City Council
in making the required findings relative to removal of onsite trees, and whether or not to
issue a tree removal permit. As noted herein, no findings associated with any Project
approvals have yet been made. These findings will be appropriately made by the Planning
Director at the time the tree removal permit is issued, based on final project design
information, including the final landscape plan. It is at the discretion of the Planning
Director to approve, conditionally approval or deny the application for a tree removal
permit, and information in the Draft EIR about existing trees to be removed will be used to
inform that decision making process, but will not be the only information considered.
Compliance with the City’s tree removal permit requirements is mandatory and, as
identified above, tree removal cannot occur until a tree removal permit is issued ensuring
compliance with the City’s tree protection policies. The commenter has provided no
evidence that the Project would conflict with the City’s tree protection policies.
Commenter’s reliance on Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Department of Food
and Agriculture13 is misplaced. In that case, the lead agency “abused its discretion by
relying on [another agency’s] regulatory scheme as a substitute for performing its own
evaluation of the environmental impacts” of the project at issue.14 There was no such
reliance on another agency’s findings here. The Draft EIR finds that, after compliance with
the City’s tree removal permit process, there would be no impact “related to conflict with
tree protection policies or ordinances.”15 Given that the impact is analyzing whether there
will be a conflict with tree protection policies or ordinances, and the Draft EIR notes that
compliance with the City’s tree removal permit process will be required, the City correctly
found that compliance with this process will result in no impact.
No additional analysis or mitigation is required for impacts to biological resources, and no
revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
13 (2005) 136 Cal.App.4th 1.
14 Id. at 16.
15 Draft EIR, p. 1-17.
Page 560
10
9. The commenter incorrectly states in the heading of this comment, and elsewhere in the
comment letter, that an “IS/MND” (referring to an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration) has been prepared for the Project. For clarification, and as acknowledged
elsewhere in the comment letter, an EIR has been prepared. This comment summarizes
CEQA requirements and caselaw related to providing substantial evidence to support the
analysis findings. While this comment quotes several provisions of CEQA, the Guidelines,
and caselaw, it does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the
Draft EIR. As such, no further response is required. Response to Comment 10 provided
below addresses comments related to this issue, and specifically information related to
the baseline conditions analyzed in the Draft EIR.
10. This comment incorrectly asserts that an improper Project baseline was utilized in the
Draft EIR thereby potentially understating air quality, GHG emissions and transportation
impacts. Section 15125 of the CEQA Guidelines sets forth the requirements for the EIR’s
description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the Project.16
Subsection (a)(1) of that Section, to which Commenter provides a limited citation, goes on
to note that “[w]here existing conditions change or fluctuate over time, and where
necessary to provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the project's
impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by referencing historic
conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or both,
that are supported with substantial evidence.”17 It further provides that “a lead agency
may also use baselines consisting of both existing conditions and projected future
conditions that are supported by reliable projections based on substantial evidence
in the record.”18 The Final Statement of Reasons for the 2018 Guidelines update explains
that “a lead agency may look back to historic conditions to establish a baseline where
existing conditions fluctuate, provided that it can document such historic conditions with
substantial evidence. (See, Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air
Quality Management District 48 Cal.4th at pp. 327-328 (‘Environmental conditions may
vary from year to year and in some cases it is necessary to consider conditions over a
range of time periods’).”19
The existing conditions defined in the Draft EIR meet the requirements outlined by the
CEQA Guidelines and applicable caselaw because they reflect the existing warehouse
and retail buildings on the Project site, occupied by warehouse uses for over 37 years,
including during preparation of the Draft EIR. The existing buildings are intact and can be
occupied by a warehouse use at any time without any discretionary approvals from the
City.20 As explained in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment included in the Draft
EIR as Appendix I-1 (“Phase I”), the existing buildings were constructed in approximately
1983 and “[s]ince construction, the site buildings have been used by Big Lots (formerly
known as Pic-N-Save) for warehouse, distribution, and retail purposes.”21
16 CEQA Guidelines §15125(a).
17 CEQA Guidelines §15125(a)(1).
18 Id.
19 CEQA Guidelines Update Statement of Reasons; available at:
https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/2018_CEQA_Final_Statement_of%20Reasons_111218.pdf
20 Draft EIR, p. 4-4.
21 Draft EIR, Appendix I-1, p. 1.
Page 561
11
Big Lots occupied the existing buildings at the time the development applications for the
Project were submitted in November 2019. Following submittal, the existing buildings were
briefly vacant from March 1, 2020 to October 29, 2020 at which time the buildings were
then re-occupied by another warehouse user (Geodis). The re-occupation of the existing
warehouse building was reasonably foreseeable when the NOP was published on October
2, 2020, as the property owner was in the process of seeking out tenants through standard
methods of advertisement. The 8-month vacancy does not represent the 37-year history
of the project site; therefore, this brief vacancy would not be considered an accurate or
reasonable baseline for the project site. Additionally, this vacancy occurred at the
beginning of the COVID pandemic, which further substantiates that the vacant condition
does not represent an accurate baseline. The NOP was published only 27 days before
the existing buildings were re-occupied by Geodis. Therefore, the EIR was prepared while
the existing buildings were occupied, coupled with their occupied use for approximately
37 years prior, is a reasonable environmental baseline to compare the Project impacts
against. Therefore, the baseline that was used to inform the analysis is supported by
substantial evidence.
The Draft EIR included the normal operation of existing buildings and uses, 23,240 square
foot (sf) retail building and a 1,431,000 sf warehouse building, as the baseline conditions
for the Project site.22 As noted above, these uses have been consistent in the existing
buildings at the Project site since their construction 37 years ago, with the exception of an
eight-month period amid a global pandemic during which the buildings were vacant before
they were reoccupied. Therefore, the Draft EIR used the “realized physical conditions on
the ground” as required by CBE. The fact that the existing buildings were briefly vacant at
the time the NOP was published does not affect the environmental baseline. As noted by
the court in CBE v. SCAQMD, “the date for establishing baseline cannot be a rigid one.
Environmental conditions may vary from year to year and in some cases it is necessary
to consider conditions over a range of time periods.”23 Importantly, CBE v. SCAQMD
notes that “[n]either CEQA nor the CEQA Guidelines mandates a uniform, inflexible rule
for determination of the existing conditions baseline. Rather, an agency enjoys the
discretion to decide, in the first instance, exactly how the existing physical conditions
without the project can most realistically be measured, subject to review, as with all CEQA
factual determinations, for support by substantial evidence.”24 In this case, the Project
site’s use as retail and warehouse for over 37 years, including during the period that the
Draft EIR was prepared, constitutes substantial evidence that those conditions represent
an accurate baseline.
With the respect to trip generation and associated air pollutant and GHG emissions from
motor vehicles, Urban Crossroads employed a commonly used tool for estimating baseline
vehicle trip generation utilizing a regionally and nationally recognized data source: ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). It is not uncommon to use the ITE Trip
22 Draft EIR, p. 4-4.
23 Id. at 327-28, quoting Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (2001) 87
Cal.App.4th 99, 125, emphasis added.
24 Id. at 329.
Page 562
12
Generation Manual rates when there is limited driveway data available as the use of the
ITE rates would provide an average representation of the existing trip generation. CEQA
allows for the impacts of a project to be assessed based on the incremental effects of the
project taking into consideration the existing/baseline conditions. As the Project site
contains multiple structures that by right could be occupied and operated by both a retail
and warehouse use, the decision to account for these uses as part of the baseline
condition is supported by CEQA caselaw, as discussed above. In an effort to conduct a
conservative analysis, the existing trip generation was estimated using ITE’s High-Cube
Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse (ITE Land Use Code 154) and Free-
Standing Discount Store (ITE Land Use Code 815) land uses.
ITE Land Use Code 154 is the lowest generating land use of the various industrial-related
land uses in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and ITE Land Use Code 815 is the best-fit
land use when taking into consideration of the retail tenant that previously occupied the
space. The daily rate for ITE Land Use Code 154 is 1.4 trips per thousand square feet as
compared to the daily rate utilized for the proposed Project (1.81 trips per thousand square
feet for ITE Land Use Code 155 and 2.12 trips per thousand square feet for ITE Land Use
Code 157). The resulting trip generation for the existing use is intentionally understated in
order to ensure the delta between the proposed Project and existing use is conservatively
higher for evaluation in the applicable technical studies. It should be noted that another
by-right warehouse user could occupy the space and generate more traffic than that
credited for the Project. In other words, the delta in trips between the proposed Project
and the existing baseline conditions is more than appropriate.
ITE describes High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse uses to include
“at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area (with an average of 798,000 square feet),
has a ceiling height of 24-feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or
consolidation of manufacturing goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their
distribution to retail locations or other warehouses.” These types of warehouses have a
high level of automation and logistics management which allow for highly efficient
processing of goods. In comparison, the ITE Land Use Code 150 for Warehousing
generically indicates that these facilities are “primarily devoted to the storage of materials.”
The average surveyed building size in the ITE Trip Generation Manual is 285,000 square
feet for the Warehousing land use and has a daily rate of 1.74 trips per day. The High-
Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse use was utilized as it closely fit the
description of the existing use relative to functionality and size and had the most
conservative (lower) daily trip generation rate.
No revisions to the Draft EIR, including the analysis of air quality, GHG emissions, and
transportation impacts are required.
11. The commenter incorrectly states in the heading of this comment that an “IS/MND”
(referring to an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) has been prepared for the
Project. For clarification, and as acknowledged elsewhere in the comment letter, an EIR
has been prepared. This comment incorrectly asserts that the analysis of air quality and
GHG emissions, and VMT is not supported by substantial evidence in the Draft EIR due
to the estimate that only 10% of the proposed building space would be occupied by high-
Page 563
13
cube cold storage warehouse uses. the focus of this comment is the difference in trip
generation estimate for warehouses with cold storage and warehouses without cold
storage. The estimate made for purposes of analysis that that 90% of the building square
footage would be operated as a high-cube non-sort fulfillment center warehouse and the
remaining 10% would be operated as a high-cube cold storage warehouse is explained in
Response to Comment 6 above. As also identified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
condition the Project with a restriction that no more than 10% of the building space be
used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space, consistent with the analysis in the Draft
EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR, including the analysis of air quality, GHG emissions,
and transportation impacts are required.
Although the commenter cites to the ITE High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation
Analysis for the proposition that “SCAQMD’s recommended air quality analysis approach
… is to utilize the cold storage trip rates when the tenant(s) is unknown and when then
proposed warehousing may accommodate that use,”25 it is assumed that the commenter
is referring to the flow chart contained within SCAQMD’s Warehouse Truck Trip Study
Data Results and Usage.26 The commenter correctly notes that the flow chart indicates
that cold storage rate should be used for sites where no tenant has been identified and
the site can allow cold storage, but fails to point out that if the site allows dedicated e-
commerce fulfillment center use, the project should develop a site-specific rate.27 Here,
the Project will be conditioned to allow only 10% cold storage use and the rest of the
warehouse will be used as a fulfillment center. Therefore, the traffic analysis used the
appropriate trip rates and the analysis is consistent with SCAQMD’s recommendations.
Notwithstanding the Project’s less than significant impact, please also refer to the
additional mitigation requirements included in new MM 2-2 (Response to Comment 2) that
would apply to cold storage tenants. These measures would further reduce the Project’s
less than significant air quality and GHG emissions impacts.
12. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Project would likely be used as a “parcel hub
warehouse” due to its proximity from the Ontario Airport and the recent exponential growth
in air freight at this location. Concurrent with preparation of the Bridge Point Rancho
Cucamonga Project Draft EIR, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was processing Ordinance
No. 982, which includes amendments to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code to modify administrative procedures and development standards within the
Development Code for industrial development within the City. The Planning Commission
hearing for Ordinance No. 982 was held on May 26, 2021, during public circulation of the
Project’s Draft EIR, and Ordinance No. 982 was adopted by the City Council on July 21,
2021. Ordinance No. 982 became effective on August 20, 2021. Pursuant to Ordinance
No. 982, and specifically Table 17.30.030-1, Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements
by Base Zoning District, parcel sorting facilities are not permitted in any zoning district,
including the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) zoning districts, which are
25 Comment 11.
26 SCAQMD Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage, Inland Empire Logistics Council, June 2014;
available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-
for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc_6-19-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
27 Id. at p. 11.
Page 564
14
the two zoning districts that allow distribution/fulfillment centers. Therefore, the proposed
buildings would not be used as a parcel hub warehouse and no further analysis is required.
13. The commenter correctly identifies that the Project VMT estimates based on the California
Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) as presented in the Bridge Point Rancho
Cucamonga Air Quality Impact Analysis (Air Quality Analysis) and Bridge Point Rancho
Cucamonga Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHG Analysis) included in Appendix B1 and
Appendix H of the Draft EIR, respectively, are higher than the VMT estimates generated
by the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) as presented in the Bridge
Point Rancho Cucamonga Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (VMT Analysis)
included in Appendix L of the Draft EIR. Based on the Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA
(December 2018) (OPR Technical Advisory), the VMT Analysis is required to use model-
based trips and trip length since that is the same model and method that the City used to
adopt their thresholds. The Project’s VMT Analysis is based on the City’s guidance to
utilize SBTAM (travel demand model) which calculates model-based trips and model-
based trip length to come up with total VMT, results are then divided by the service
population, in this case employees, as outlined in the VMT Analysis.
For purposes of the Air Quality Analysis, CalEEMod defaults for trip length (16.6 miles) x
the ITE-based trip generation were used, consistent with industry standards for conducting
air quality analyses. The SBTAM model was developed based on regionally specific
transportation and employment data and is a more accurate representation of the Project’s
VMT. However, because CalEEMod is the standard model used for air quality and GHG
analysis, the VMT calculated from this model was conservatively used for those impact
determinations. Therefore, the appropriate methods for determining VMT were used for
the respective analyses and there is no correlation between the two methods. No revisions
to the analysis presented in the Draft EIR are required.
14. The commenter incorrectly states in the heading of this comment that an “IS/MND”
(referring to an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) has been prepared for the
Project. For clarification, and as acknowledged elsewhere in the comment letter, an EIR
has been prepared.
Urban Crossroads prepared the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) Analysis dated March 23, 2021, and Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga High-Cube
Fulfillment Center Traffic Memo (Traffic Memo) dated April 15, 2021. These documents
are included in Appendix L1 and Appendix L2 of the Draft EIR, respectively, and are
summarized in Section 4.13, Transportation, of the Draft EIR. Urban Crossroads has
provided technical input for this response, which is based on the comment letter from
Smart Mobility (Exhibit D of this Comment Letter).
This comment incorrectly asserts that the Project Transportation Analysis is not supported
by substantial evidence. The City Guidelines state that a low VMT area is defined as an
individual traffic analysis zone (TAZ) where total daily Origin/Destination (O/D) VMT per
service population is lower than the City average total daily O/D VMT per service
population. (City Guidelines pg. 19-20) This test was performed, and it was disclosed in
the analysis that the project did not meet this test. However, City Guidelines also state
Page 565
15
elsewhere that “it may be appropriate to extract the project generated VMT using the
production-attraction (P/A) trip matrix instead of the O/D trip matrix… when a project is
entirely composed of retail or employment type uses and there is a need to isolate
commute VMT.” (City Guidelines page 23). The Guidelines also state “The City should
evaluate the appropriate methodology based on the project land use types and context.”
(City Guidelines page 23). In this case, VMT for this Project is entirely composed of
employment uses and the City appropriately evaluated the VMT per service population
based on the P/A trip matrix as well, which resulted in the Project residing in a low VMT
area. As stated in the OPR Technical Advisory, “…projects that locate in areas with low
VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility),
will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT” (OPR Technical Advisory pg. 12). The Project here
is consistent with the underlying land use and does not propose to change other factors
that would prohibit the use of map-based screening. This methodology is appropriate for
the Project land use type (industrial warehouse) based on the adopted VMT analysis
guidelines and impact thresholds.
15. This comment also incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR transportation analysis is
unsubstantiated, and refers to the Smart Mobility Comment letter. Following is a response
to each of the issues raised in this comment.
1. The City Guidelines also state that “for low VMT screening to be satisfied, the analyst
must verify that the project land uses would not alter the existing built environment
in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips (e.g., the proposed
project is consistent with existing land use in the area, the project would be expected
to contribute VMT consistent with existing land use in the area, and the project would
not significantly alter travel patterns in the area).” Consistent with the Guidelines and
for disclosure purposes, a full VMT analysis was also conducted for the Project
based on the City’s adopted guidance to use the P/A trip matrix for single land use
projects. The analysis findings support and verify the screening conclusion that P/A
based project generated VMT per service population would not exceed the City’s
impact threshold or significantly alter travel patterns in the area. As explained in the
VMT analysis, the Project generated VMT per service population is 7.77% below
than the City’s current threshold, and the cumulative project generated VMT per
service population 10.34% below the City’s threshold. Therefore, the Project’s VMT
impact would also be considered less than significant based on the comparison of
baseline project generated VMT per service population to the City’s adopted
threshold and the comparison of cumulative project generated VMT per service
population to the City’s adopted threshold.
2. The SBTAM model output files are proprietary files that require a specialized
program called TransCAD to read and open. This is because the SBTAM model is
built upon TransCAD software. The model outputs (i.e., matrices) can contain
thousands of rows and thousands of columns for each matrix (of which there are
numerous). The volume of information from the model matrices is far more
substantial than for other technical areas (like noise, air quality, traffic, etc.). Because
each of the matrices can have thousands of rows and thousands of columns, they
cannot be printed as part of an appendix and it is not feasible to include them in the
Page 566
16
EIR. The key model input (i.e., number of project employees, location, and industrial
use) is included in the VMT Analysis. The resulting VMT for the Project from the
SBTAM model outputs was accurately calculated and is provided in Table 4.13-6 of
the Draft EIR. Further, as outlined in the VMT Analysis, “the Project meets the Low
VMT Area screening criteria … and therefore results in less than significant
transportation impact.” As such, while the project-level VMT analysis was not
required, it was conducted and provided for informational purposes based on the
City’s adopted guidance to use the P/A trip matrix for single land use projects. The
analysis findings support and verify the screening conclusion that P/A based project
generated VMT per service population would not exceed the City’s impact threshold
or significantly alter travel patterns in the area. In addition, it is also important to note
that the OPR Technical Advisory notes that when estimating the effect of an
office/employment development on VMT, it may be appropriate to consider total
employee VMT, which is consistent with CEQA’s requirement to evaluate both direct
and indirect effects of a project. Evaluating project VMT utilizing the P/A trip matrix
is consistent with OPR guidance.
3. Refer to Response to Comment 12, which addresses operation of the Project with
respect to parcel hub warehouses. As identified, in accordance with the City’s current
zoning, parcel sorting facilities are not permitted in any of the City’s zoning districts.
4. Refer to Response to Comment 13, which addresses the CalEEMod VMT estimates.
No revisions to the Draft EIR, including the analysis of transportation and VMT impacts
are required.
16. This comment summarizes CEQA requirements and caselaw related to analyzing
inconsistencies between a project and planning documents. While this comment quotes
several provisions of CEQA, the Guidelines, and caselaw, it does not raise any issues with
the environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR. As such, no further response is
required. Response to Comment 17 provided below addresses comments related to this
issue, and specifically the Project’s consistency with the Southern California Associate of
Governments (SCAG) Connect SoCal.
17. As commenter notes, Guidelines Section 15125(d) requires discussion of the project in
relation to any applicable general plans, specific plans, or regional plans. The Draft EIR
properly analyzes consistency with SCAG’s Connect SoCal in several places, including
consistency with its purpose and objectives,28 as well as in the air quality section,29 GHG
Emission section, under the heading “Connect SoCal 2020-2045 RTP/SCS
Consistency,”30 the land use and planning section,31 the population and housing section,32
and the transportation section.33 This analysis is consistent with SCAG’s guidance on
28 Draft EIR, p. 3-3.
29 Draft EIR, p. 4.2-27 – 28.
30 Draft EIR, p. 4.7-20
31 Draft EIR, p. 4.10-2 – 3, 4.10-13 – 14.
32 Draft EIR, p. 4.12-1 – 2.
33 Draft EIR, p. 4.13-2 – 3, 4.13-25.
Page 567
17
how to implement plan consistency, which provides that “[f]or the purpose of determining
consistency with Connect SoCal for … CEQA … lead agencies such as local jurisdictions
have the sole discretion in determining a local project’s consistency.”34 The additional
areas to which commenter cites within Connect SoCal refer to the fleet of vehicles that will
be coming to and from the Project once it is in operation. As noted in the Draft EIR and
elsewhere herein, no tenant has yet been identified for the Project. Any vehicles coming
to and from the Project once it is in operation will be required to comply with all air quality
regulations and plans applicable to the area. Further, CARB is tasked with regulating the
GHG emissions to which commenter refers and, as CARB’s regulations get more
stringent, the Project’s GHG emissions will decrease as well by virtue of its compliance
with them. In addition, SCAQMD recently adopted Rule 2305, the Warehouse Indirect
Source Rule, which sets forth additional requirements “to reduce local and regional
emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, and to facilitate local and regional
emission reductions associated with warehouses and the mobile sources attracted to
warehouses in order to assist in meeting state and federal air quality standards for ozone
and fine particulate matter.”35 This rule applies to “owners and operators of warehouses
located in the [SCAQMD] jurisdiction with greater than or equal to 100,000 square feet of
indoor floor space,”36 which, as discussed herein and in the Draft EIR, includes the Project.
While this rule is subject to a legal challenge, it is worth noting that the new rules are
currently applicable to the Project when it is developed and operational. As a result, these
new rules likely would result in reductions to Project operational GHG emissions beyond
those identified in the Draft EIR.
18. This conclusion statement reflects the opinion that recirculation of the Draft EIR is
required. As presented in the responses to comments above, the findings and conclusions
of the Draft EIR are not affected by any of the comments contained herein. Therefore,
there are no changes or revisions to the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the
Draft EIR.
Responses to SWAPE Letter (Exhibits A, B and C of the Comment Letter)
19. The comment letter included in Exhibit B provides an explanation of how CalEEMod is used
to calculate emissions from construction worker vehicle trips, describes the relationship
between construction worker trip length and VMT, and suggests that hiring local
construction labor can reduce worker trip lengths and associated GHG emissions. Exhibit
B and Exhibit C of the comment letter includes resumes for SWAPE technical staff. Exhibits
A, B and C do not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the Draft
EIR, thus, no further response is required. Also refer to Response to Comment 2 above,
which further addresses use of local labor for construction of the Project. As noted above,
this comment letter and its attachments were withdrawn because the Southwest Regional
Carpenters are satisfied that the Developer has committed to additional environmental
34Connect SoCal, p. xiv; available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal-
plan_0.pdf?1606001176.
35 Rule 2305, Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE)
Program, adopted May 7, 2021, p. 1. Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-
xxiii/r2305.pdf?sfvrsn=15.
36 Id.
Page 568
18
measures that further reduce the Project’s environmental impacts, including Covid-19 safe
construction work practices; local and trained workforce for carpenter craft work; EV-ready
truck dock positions; solar; and Tier 4 standards for certain off-road construction
equipment.
Responses to Smart Mobility Comment Letter (Exhibit D of the Comment Letter)
20. This comment provides a summary of the comments provided in the body of the letter
included in Exhibit D addressing calculation of VMT and the Project’s VMT analysis, and
the assertion that the Project would likely function as a parcel hub. As presented in the
responses to comments above, the Draft EIR adequately analyzes and discloses the
potential environmental impacts resulting from the Project, including transportation/VMT
impacts. Moreover, as explained in Response to Comment 12 above, parcel hub is not an
allowable use at the Project Site and therefore the Project will not function as a parcel hub.
As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR analysis or conclusions are required, and
recirculation of the Draft EIR is not required.
21. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR VMT Analysis conducted for the Project
incorrectly applies the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool. Please refer to Response to Comment
14, which addresses this issue.
22. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Draft EIR incorrectly used the VMT per service
population metric. Please refer to Response to Comment 15 (Item 1), which addresses this
issue.
23. This comment indicates that the SBTAM modeling results have been omitted from the Draft
EIR. Please refer to Response to Comment 15 (Item 2), which addresses this issue.
24. This comment incorrectly asserts that the Project’s trip generation is underestimated
because operation of the proposed buildings as a parcel hub warehouse was not
considered. Please refer to Response to Comment 12, which addresses this issue.
This comment also indicates that the Draft EIR does not explain why the proposed site plan
does not support a sort use. The future tenants of the buildings are not currently known,
could not reasonably be known, and were not known when the Draft EIR was prepared.
The Project involves the development of two Class A speculative industrial buildings that
are designed to meet contemporary industry standards, and that can accommodate a wide
variety of users. Each building has been designed to operate independently. Therefore, for
purposes of analysis in the Draft EIR, certain assumptions regarding the Projects’ physical
characteristics, operations, and construction activities are made, and are clearly identified
in Draft EIR Section 3.0, Project Description. The proposed building design/site plan and
associated parking layout was the basis for anticipating that the proposed buildings would
operate as non-sort fulfillment centers. As identified on Page 3-9 of the Draft EIR, based
on ITE Trip Rate 155 for “fulfillment center” a non-sort fulfillment center typically ships large
box items that use more automation than manual sortation, and a sort fulfillment center
typically ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means.
The sort facility operations require more employees and associate parking.
Page 569
19
As provided by the CEQA Guidelines, a conclusion is supported by substantial evidence if
there is “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences … that a fair argument
can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be
reached.” In this case, the Project buildings, due to the proposed design and parking
layout, are anticipated to operate as non-sort fulfillment centers, and that was appropriately
the basis for analysis in the Draft EIR, including the VMT analysis. It should also be noted
that (1) as discussed in Response to Comment 6, the Project Applicant has agreed as part
of the proposed Development Agreement that the proposed buildings would not be
operated as sort use fulfillment centers; and (2) as discussed in Response to Comment 12,
in accordance with the City’s current zoning, parcel sorting facilities are not permitted in
any of the City’s zoning districts. Therefore, the proposed buildings would not be operated
as a sort use fulfillment center or parcel hub facility and no further analysis is required.
25. This comment identifies the differences between the VMT estimates generated by
CalEEMod and the SBTAM model, again raises the issue of operation of the Project as a
parcel hub warehouse, and indicates that traffic impacts are underestimated. Please refer
to Response to Comment 12, 13, and 24, which address these issues.
Page 570
P: (626) 381-9248
F: (626) 389-5414
E: info@mitchtsailaw.com
Mitchell M. Tsai
Attorney At Law
155 South El Molino Avenue
Suite 104
Pasadena, California 91101
VIA E-MAIL
July 14, 2021
Mike Smith, Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Dept.
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Em: Michael.Smith@cityofrc.us
Sean McPherson, Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Dept.
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Em: Sean.McPherson@cityofrc.us
RE: Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project (SCH No. 2020100056) Draft
Environmental Impact Report June 21, 2021 Letter
Dear Mike Smith and Sean McPherson,
On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, the Office of Mitchell M.
Tsai withdraws its comment letter dated June 21, 2021, on the Bridge Point Rancho
Cucamonga Project Draft EIR and respectfully requests that the letter not be included
in the Final EIR.
The Southwest Regional Carpenters are satisfied that the Developer has committed to
additional environmental measures that further reduce the Project’s environmental
impacts, including Covid-19 safe construction work practices; local and trained
workforce for carpenter craft work; EV-ready truck dock positions; solar; and Tier 4
standards for certain off-road construction equipment.
Sincerely,
___________________________
Mitchell M. Tsai
Page 571
<Recipient> -<Subject Matter>
July 14, 2021
Page 2 of 2
Attorneys for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters
Page 572
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2020-00213, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM A SPLIT DESIGNATION OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL FOR 91.39 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA
AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF
FOURTH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for General
Plan Amendment No. DRC2020-00213 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2.WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213.
3.WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date; and
4.WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 91.39-acres
of land, located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue, 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda
Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street. Said parcels of land are currently designated
as both Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE); and
b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project
site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Attachment 5Page573
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106
GPA DRC2020-00213 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
c.This application changes the General Plan land use designation for two project
related parcels of land (APN: 0229-283-50 and 0229-283-51) from a split designation of General
Industrial and Heavy Industrial to General Industrial; and
d. This project also necessitates amending the Zoning Map (DRC2020-00267) to
change the zoning designation of the same two project related parcels of land (APN: 0229-283-
50 and 0229-283-51) from a split zoning designation of Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial
Employment (IE) to Neo-Industrial (NI).
e.In addition to the subject General Plan Amendment, the project scope includes
Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design
Review DRC2020-00202, Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-0266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-
00315) to allow for the anticipated use and a Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180).
3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.Approving the General Plan Amendment is in the public interest as it corrects a
discrepancy whereas the current project site, which comprises two parcels which are currently
designated between two land use designations (General Industrial and Heavy Industrial), would
be redesignated under one land use designation of General Industrial. Correcting this discrepancy
in land use designations complies with General Plan Land Use Goal LU-9 which requires that the
City “Foster a cohesive, healthy community through appropriate patterns and scales of
development, including complementary transitions between districts, neighborhoods and land
uses.”
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail, and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
Page 574
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106
GPA DRC2020-00213 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
b. The approval of the application will allow for the development of the project,
including the construction of a new public street as a condition of approval, will contribute
positively to the surrounding area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements
to an underutilized project site while also improving traffic circulation within the vicinity of the
project area. In addition, the project site is located in an area of the City that is specifically planned
for industrial uses, such as the project, in the General Plan. Thus, there is a substantial public
benefit to be derived from the application and the application furthers the planning goals of the
General Plan.
4. The General Plan Amendment, in addition to the Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative
Parcel Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit, Minor Use Permit, and Development
Agreement (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA
Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR
would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report
(EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. . By separate Resolution
No. 2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and
determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is incorporated herein by reference, and made a
part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the
record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in
the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are
made applicable to the Project..
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves the application for General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213
subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan Land Use Map is hereby amended to
change the land use designation of the subject 91.39 acres of land from Neo-Industrial (NI) and
Industrial Employment (IE), to Neo-Industrial (NI), as shown in Attachment A.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to
the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by
certified mail, return receipt requested, to Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, at the address
identified in City records.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day
Page 575
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106
GPA DRC2020-00213 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
of October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 576
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106
GPA DRC2020-00213 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 5
Attachment A
Page 577
Civ/Reg
GI
GI
HI
GI
GI
HI
Page 578
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 579
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 580
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 581
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 582
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 583
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 584
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 585
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 586
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 587
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 588
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 589
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 590
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 591
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 592
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 593
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 594
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 595
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 596
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 597
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 598
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 599
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 600
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 601
ORDINANCE NO. 986
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2020-00267, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM A SPLIT DESIGNATION OF THE NEO-INDUSTRIAL (NI) AND INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (IE) DISTRICTS TO NEO-INDUSTRIAL (NI) DISTRICT FOR 91.39 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for Zoning Map
Amendment No. DRC2020-00267, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the Application."
2.WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application DRC2020-00267 and
unanimously adopted Resolution No. 21-58 recommending that the City Council approve Zoning Map
Amendment DRC2020-002267.
3.WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing and introduced for First Reading of Ordinance 986 adopting Zoning
Map Amendment DRC2020-00267 and concluded said hearing on that date.
4.WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to property located within the City; and
b.The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 91.39-acres of land,
located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue, 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north
of 4th Street and south of 6th Street. Said parcels of land are currently designated as both Neo-Industrial
(NI) and Industrial Employment (IE); and
c.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and
adjacent properties are as follows:
Attachment 6
Page 602
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 986
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2020-00267 – Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail, and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
d.This amendment changes the zoning designation for two project related parcels of land
(APN: 0229-283-50 and 0229-283-51) from Neo-Industrial (NI) District and Industrial Employment (IE)
District to Neo-Industrial (NI) District; and
e.This amendment necessitates amending the General Plan Land Use Map (DRC2020-
00213) to change land use designation for the two project related parcels of land (APN: 0229-283-50 and
0229-283-51) from the current split designation of General Industrial and Heavy Industrial to General
Industrial; and
f.In addition to the subject Zoning Map Amendment, the project scope includes General
Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213, Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review DRC2020-
00202, Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-0266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development
Agreement (DRC2021-00180).
SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a.That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms
of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. With approval of Zoning
Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, the project will be compatible with the existing and future land uses
surrounding the project site. The proposed Neo-Industrial (NI) designation is compatible with the
surrounding designations; and
Page 603
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 986
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2020-00267 – Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed
Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with General Plan. Approving the Zoning Map Amendment
corrects a discrepancy whereas the current project site, which comprises two parcels which are currently
split zoned between Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) would be redesignated under one
zoning district, Neo-Industrial (NI). Correcting this split-zoning discrepancy complies with General Plan
Land Use Goal LU-9 which requires that the City “Foster a cohesive, healthy community through
appropriate patterns and scales of development, including complementary transitions between districts,
neighborhoods and land uses.”; and
c. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor
the surrounding properties. The amendment will change the zoning designation for two project related
parcels of land (APN: 0229-283-50 and 0229-283-51) from the current designation which is split between
the Neo-Industrial (NI) District and Industrial Employment (IE) District to Neo-Industrial (NI) District, for
which a portion of the site is already currently zoned
SECTION 4: The Zoning Map Amendment, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Tentative
Parcel Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit, Minor Use Permit, and Development Agreement
(collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the
Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially
significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution No. 2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made
the required CEQA findings and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is
incorporated herein by reference, and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and
other materials that constitute the record on which this determination was made are located in the
Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures
set forth therein are made applicable to the Project.
SECTION 5: The Zoning Map is hereby amended to change the zoning designation for the subject
91.39 acres of land from Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) District to Neo-Industrial (NI)
District, as shown in Attachment A.
SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for
any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, clauses,
phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by
subsequent legislation.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
Page 604
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 986
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2020-00267 – Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 2021.
BY: ____________________________________
L.Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the 20th day of October, 2021, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of ______________, 2021, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 605
Page 606
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 607
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 608
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 609
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 610
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 611
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 612
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 613
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 614
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 615
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 616
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 617
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 618
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 619
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 620
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 621
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 622
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 623
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 624
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 625
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 626
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 627
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 628
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 629
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM20271, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 91.39 ACRE PROJECT
SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS
LOCATED APPROXIAMTELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA
AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 0229-283-50 AND
51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC has filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the
application."
2.WHEREAS, September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that
the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271; and
3.WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date;
and
4.WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES:
1.This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 91.39-acre project site is located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita
Avenue and approximately 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th
Street. The site is currently improved with two buildings: a large industrial warehouse building
addressed 12434 4th Street, totaling approximately 1,431,000 square feet in size and a smaller
concrete tilt-up building addressed 12322 4th Street, totaling approximately 23,240 square feet. The
northerly portion of the project site comprises 11 acres of vacant land which previously consisted of
a vineyard. The remainder of the project site is improved with parking areas, drive aisles, trailer
loading areas and landscaping. Curb, gutter, streetlights and sidewalks have been constructed
along 4th Street and 6th Street. A rail spur running east and west borders the property to the north
parallel to 6th Street. This rail spur turns south into the property, running north and south and serves
Attachment 7Page630
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX
SUBTPM20271 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
the properties to the east of the project site. All existing improvements, with the exception of the rail
spur, will be demolished as a result of this project; and
b.The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
c.The project is for the construction and operation of two new industrial warehouse
buildings totaling approximately 2,175,000 square feet; and
d.Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271 is for the subdivision of the 91.39-acre
project site into two parcels of land. Proposed Building 1, totaling approximately 1,422,500 square
feet will be located on Parcel 1 which will total an area of approximately 55 acres. Building 2,
totaling approximately 752,500 square feet will be located on Parcel 2 which will total an area of
approximately 30 acres. The project will also result in the construction of a new north-south public
street (Catherine Bridge Place), proposed to connect 4th Street and 6th Street. Vehicular access to
Parcel 1 will be from 4th Street and access to Parcel 2 will be from 6th Street. Catherine Bridge Place
will also provide vehicular access to both new parcels.; and
e.This application is also being processed concurrently with General Plan
Amendment DRC2020-00213, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM20271, Design Review DRC2020-00202, Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266, Minor
Use Permit DRC2021-00315 and Development Agreement DRC2021-00180; and
3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Page 631
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX
SUBTPM20271 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
a.The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan permits a variety of land uses within industrial
districts, such as warehouses, distribution centers and similar uses. The Development Code, as
affected by Ordinance 982, permits Large Distribution/Fulfillment Centers upon the approval of a
Minor Use Permit.
b.The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two parcel
tentative parcel map and the proposed industrial warehouse development comply with all
requirements of the General Plan and Development Code. Each parcel complies with the 0.5-acre
minimum lot size and 100-foot minimum lot width outlined in Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development
Code. Additionally, the proposed industrial warehouse development complies with all of the related
development standards including buiding setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking and design; and
c.The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed.
The project site is well suited for the proposed industrial warehouse development as it is located
along multiple street frontages, thereby providing multiple points of ingress/egress and emergency
services access. The density is below the authorized permitted size under the General Plan and
Development Code; and
d.The design or proposed improvements of the subdivision are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. An
Environmental Impact Report was submitted as part of the review of the project which demonstrated
that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment upon implementation of
identified mitigation measures; and
e.The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The
subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues, as the proposed
tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels in order to
create two separate parcels for two new proposed industrial warehouse buildings. The review of the
project included the evaluation of environmental studies which concluded that the project would not
have a significant impact on the environment.
f.The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired
by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use
of the project site for the project.
4.The Tentative Parcel Map, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map
Amendment, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit, Minor Use Permit, and Development
Agreement (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA
Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR would
clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) that
focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution No.
2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and determinations, (ii)
certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the
Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is incorporated herein by reference, and made a part
Page 632
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-107
SUBTPM20271 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the record on
which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody
of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to
the Project.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves the application for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271 subject to
each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, at the address identified in
City records.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of
October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 633
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 634
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 635
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 636
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 637
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 638
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 639
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 640
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 641
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 642
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, , Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 643
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 644
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 645
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 646
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, , Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 647
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 648
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 649
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 650
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 651
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 652
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 653
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 654
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 655
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 656
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN
REVIEW DRC2020-00202, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
TOTALING 2,175,000 SQUARE FEET ON CERTAIN PROPERTY
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA
AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH
OF 4TH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for the approval
of Design Review DRC2020-00202, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application;" and
2.WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that
the City Council approve Design Review DRC2020-00202; and
3.WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date;
and
4.WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES:
1.This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearings on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 91.39-acre project site is located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street; and
b.The project site is improved with an existing 1,431,000 square foot industrial
warehouse building and an existing 23,240 square foot retail building and associated improvements
such as parking areas, drive aisles, loading areas, landscaped areas and a rail spur which serves
properties to the east of the project site. The site also includes an area comprising approximately
11-acres of vacant land which was previously used as a vineyard. All existing improvements, except
for the rail spur, will be demolished as part of this project; and
Attachment 8
Page 657
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00202–BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
c.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail, and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
d.The project is for the development of two new industrial warehouse buildings on
two new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 1,422,500 square feet including a
mezzanine not to exceed 25,000 square feet, and Building 2 will total approximately 752,500 square
feet and include a mezzanine not to exceed 16,000 square feet; and
e.The project also includes an application to subdivide the project site into two new
parcels: Parcel 1 which will total approximately 55 acres in size and be developed with Building 1,
and Parcel 2, which will total approximately 30 acres in size and be developed with Building 2; and
f.The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including
setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and
g.The project requires 469 parking stalls and 268 trailer loading stalls for Building 1
and 184 parking stalls and 91 trailer loading stalls for Building 2. Accordingly, the project provides
478 parking stalls and 268 trailer loading stalls for Building 1, and 221 parking stalls and 91 trailer
loading stalls for Building 2; and
h.The project scope includes General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213, Zoning Map
Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, Tree Removal Permit
DRC2020-00266, Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 and Development Agreement DRC2021-
00180.
Page 658
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00202–BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed industrial
warehouse project will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of General Plan
Amendment DRC2020-00213, which will amend the General Plan land use designation of the
project site from a split designation of General Industrial and Heavy Industrial to General Industrial,
a land use designation which permits the proposed industrial warehouse use; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is located. Industrial warehouses, specifically Large
Distribution/Fulfillment Centers, are permitted within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District subject to the
approval of a Minor Use Permit. Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 was submitted for the operation
of a Large Distribution/Fulfillment Center use. The project will be in compliance with the Zoning Map
with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, which will amend the zoning
designation of the project area which is currently split between the Neo-Industrial (NI) District and
Industrial Employment (IE) District to Neo-Industrial (NI) District for the whole of the project area;
and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of
the related General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-
00267. Large Distribution/Fulfillment Centers are permitted within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District
upon the approval of a Minor Use Permit. The project complies with all other development criteria
outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking, and design; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental
impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. The Design Review, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map,
Tree Removal Permit, Minor Use Permit, and Development Agreement (collectively, the “Project”)
were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that
an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact
report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution
No. 2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and
determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is incorporated herein by reference, and made a
part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the
record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in the
custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made
applicable to the Project.
Page 659
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00202–BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Council hereby approves the application for Design Review DRC2020-00202 subject to each and
every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, at the address identified in
City records.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of
October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 660
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 661
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 662
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 663
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 664
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 665
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 666
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 667
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 668
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 669
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 670
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 671
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 672
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 673
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 674
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 675
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 676
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 677
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 678
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 679
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 680
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 681
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 682
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 683
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
DRC2020-00266 TO REMOVE UP TO 101 HERITAGE TREES, IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW
INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST
OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH
STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS:
0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for Tree
Removal Permit DRC2020-00266 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2.WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September 2021, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and
concluded said hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously
to recommend that the City Council approve Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266.
3.WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date.
4.WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 91.39-acre project site is located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa
Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street;
and
b.The project site includes 589 trees, including 125 heritage trees. The project will
result in the removal of 464 non-heritage trees and 101 heritage trees, thus necessitating a tree
removal permit; and
Attachment 9
Page 684
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00266 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
c. Pursuant to the tree replacement requirements established by the Development
Code, the project will result in the planting of 712 trees, including 229 new street trees and 107
replacement heritage trees; and
d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations
for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as
follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail, and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
e. The applicant is requesting the removal of up to 101 heritage trees. A Tree
Inventory Report (Psomas, 2021) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the trees
within the project area. The report concludes that based on the fact that many of the trees are
planted near pavement, structures, or within basins that likely have limited root development,
minor damage and upheaval are expected to occur as the roots continue to develop. Further,
stress in the form of reflected heat from nearby structures and pavement is expected to affect
trees on the project site.; and
f.This application is in conjunction with General Plan Amendment DRC2020-
00213, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, Design
Review DRC2020-00202, Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 and Development Agreement
DRC2021-00180.
3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Page 685
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00266 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
a. Due to their proximity to existing structures, pavement, and basins, as noted in
the Tree Inventory Report prepared for the project, the location of existing trees will eventually
result in limited root development which will result in minor damage and upheaval. Under existing
conditions, stress in the form of reflected hgear from nearby structures and pavement affects trees
on the Project site; and
b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which
will allow economic enjoyment of the property. Of the 125 heritage trees onsite, 101 will be
removed as they are in conflict with the proposed development, including the construction of a
new public street; and
c. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the
established character of the area, and property values. The removal of the trees will not negatively
impact the neighborhood or the character of the area as there are a number of mature trees within
the vicinity of the project site. Additionally, the applicant will plant 712 replacement trees including
229 street trees and 107 new heritage trees; and
d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within
the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. The removal of the
subject trees is necessary to construct public improvements required by the project; and
e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or
relocation. The trees to be removed conflict with the proposed improvements related to the
construction of the proposed industrial warehouse development; and
f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. The trees
slated for removal do not constitute a significant natural resource as the trees in the surrounding
area are not dependent for their survival or are they significant because of their size, species,
location or aesthetic qualities; and
g. Removal of the trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, or
condition of approval, nor are any of the trees to be removed identified as a historic landmark;
and
h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project
and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. Of the 125 heritage trees identified
onsite, the applicant has identified 24 heritage trees which will remain. The trees slated for
removal are in conflict with the construction of important onsite improvements needed to improve
circulation in the area, including the construction of a new public street, and cannot be
incorporated into the project as a result of those improvements. Further, the trees must be
removed in order to permit development of the site consistent with the densities and standards
set forth in the General Plan and Development Code; and
i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or
viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the
surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees and industrial
development, at a great distance from residential areas or areas where the public is known to
Page 686
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00266 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
recreate. The impact on the surrounding area will be minimal with the planting of 712 replacement
trees.
4. The Tree Removal Permit, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map
Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Minor Use Permit, and Development
Agreement (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA
Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR
would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report
(EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. . By separate Resolution
No. 2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and
determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is incorporated herein by reference, and made a
part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the
record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in
the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are
made applicable to the Project.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council approves the application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266 subject to
each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed t: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by
certified mail, return receipt requested, Bridge Point Development, LLC, at the address identified
in City records.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day
of October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 687
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00266 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 5
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 688
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 689
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 690
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 691
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 692
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 693
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 694
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 695
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 696
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 697
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 698
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 699
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 700
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 701
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 702
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 703
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 704
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 705
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 706
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 707
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 708
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 709
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 710
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 711
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR USE PERMIT DRC2021-
00315, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A LARGE DISTRIBUTION/FULFILLMENT
CENTER (E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION) USE RELATED TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS
TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2,175,000 SQUARE FEET ON CERTAIN
PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA
ANITA AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF
4TH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for the approval of
Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Minor Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2.WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the
City Council approve Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315.
3.WHEREAS, On October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date
4.WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY
RESOLVES:
1.This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced
public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 91.39-acre project site is located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street and is
improved with an existing 1,431,000 square foot industrial warehouse building and an existing 23,240
square foot retail building and associated improvements such as parking areas, drive aisles, loading
areas, landscaped areas and a rail spur which serves properties to the east of the project site. The site
also includes an area comprising approximately 11-acres of vacant land which was previously used as a
vineyard. All existing improvements, with the exception of an existing rail spur, will be demolished as part
of this project
b.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and
adjacent properties are as follows:
Attachment 10Page712
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110
MUP DRC2021-00315 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 2
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail, and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
c.The project site is improved with an existing 1,431,000 square foot industrial warehouse
building and an existing 23,240 square foot retail building and associated improvements such as parking
areas, drive aisles, loading areas, landscaped areas and a rail spur which serves properties to the east
of the project site. The site also includes an area comprising approximately 11-acres of vacant land
which was previously used as a vineyard. All existing improvements, with the exception of the rail spur,
will be demolished as part of this project; and
d.The project scope includes General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213, Zoning Map
Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, Design Review DRC2020-00202,
Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266, Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 and Development
Agreement DRC2021-00180; and
e.The project is for the development of two new industrial warehouse buildings on two
new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 1,422,500 square feet including a mezzanine not
to exceed 25,000 square feet, and Building 2 will total approximately 752,500 square feet and include a
mezzanine not to exceed 16,000 square feet; and
f.The project requires 469 parking stalls and 268 trailer loading stalls for Building 1 and
184 parking stalls and 91 trailer loading stalls for Building 2. Accordingly, the project provides 478
parking stalls and 268 trailer loading stalls for Building 1, and 221 parking stalls and 91 trailer loading
stalls for Building 2; and
g. The project’s compliance with the related development standards is shown in the
following tables:
Page 713
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110
MUP DRC2021-00315 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 3
Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Complies?
Warehouse/storage
and office
1 per 1,000 sf for the first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for
the next 20,000 sf, and 1 per
4,000 sf for remaining sf
Office requires 1 per 250 sf
Building
1: 469
stalls;
Building
2: 268
stalls
Building 1:
478;
Building 2:
268
YES
Trailer Loading
Stalls 1 per loading dock
Building
1: 184;
Building
2: 91
Building 1:
221;
Building 2:
91
YES
3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced
public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council
hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height
Maximum 35 feet (at front
setback) and
75 feet (1-foot increment
from the front setback
line)
Building 1: 54 feet; Building 2:
50 feet YES
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) 50-60%Building 1: 59.2%; Building 2:
57.8% YES
Front Building
Setback
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street)
Building 1: ~118 feet
(4th Street); Building 2: ~215
feet (6th Street)
YES
Street Side
Setback 25 Feet (Street A) Building 1: ~185 feet;
Building 2: ~93 feet YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
45 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
YES
Parking Setback
25 feet (4th Street);
20 feet (6th Street);
15 feet (Street A)
46 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
YES
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet Building 1: 136 feet
Building 2: 45 feet YES
Rear Yard
Setback Min. 0 feet Building 1: 77 feet
Building 2: ~90 feet YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10% 10% YES
Page 714
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110
MUP DRC2021-00315 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 4
a. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use
including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints, and can be conditioned to meet all
related performance criteria and development standards.
b. The operating characteristics of the proposed use, including traffic, noise, light, and
other characteristics, will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other adjacent uses in
the vicinity. The project involves the demolition of an existing industrial warehouse use and the
construction of two new industrial warehouse uses of similar scale and characteristics. The proposed use
is required to comply with all relevant industrial performance standards pursuant to Development Code
Section 17.66.110 for noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odor, and humidity, heat,
and glare. Further, the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project identified mitigation
measures which when implemented will mitigate traffic characteristics to less than significant levels.
c. The proposed improvements of the site, including building design, height and bulk of
buildings, setbacks fencing, landscaping, signage size and location are compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood or area. The project meets all relevant development standards including height, setbacks,
fencing and landscaping. The buildings design, including bulk and massing, comply with design criteria
established by the Development Code. Specifically, the project meets design provisions established by
Development Code Section 17.122.030.
d. The proposed use shall not result in conditions that would be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare of the community. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the
project which determined that, with the implementation of certain mitigation measures, the project will not
result in significant environmental impacts. The project includes the construction of a new public street,
running north-south along the eastern property line of the project site, which will connect 4th Street and
6th Street thereby improving traffic circulation within the vicinity of the project. The new public street will
also improve vehicular access, as well as emergency access, to the project site and proposed industrial
buildings and users.
e. Adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed use of will
be made available concurrent with the proposed development. The project has street frontage on 4th
Street, 6th Street and a new north-south public street proposed to be located along the eastern property
line of the project site which will connect 4th Street and 6th Street. The site is served, or will be
conditioned to be served by, services and utilities provided by Burrtec Waste Industries, Cucamonga
Valley Water District, Southern California Edison, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility, and all other
public and private services that accommodate the operation of Large Distribution/Fulfillment Center (E-
Commerce Distribution).
f. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed location would be consistent with and help
achieve the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan and the development code. Large
Distribution/Fulfillment Center (E-Commerce Distribution) is permitted within the Neo-Industrial (NI)
District subject to the approval of a Minor Use Permit. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed
location would achieve General Plan Policy ED-1.5 (Support housing opportunities for workers of all
income ranges) and Policy ED-4.5 (Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic
benefits of new proposed uses in the City’s industrial-zoned areas) as the developer has agreed to pay a
Community Benefit Fee to offset any impact to the City’s affordable housing demand as a result of the
number of jobs anticipated to be created by the use. The project would also achieve ED-4.3 (Improve
connectivity between development projects to create a more cohesive atmosphere) as the project
Page 715
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX
MUP DRC2021-00315 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 5
involves the construction of a new north-south public street which connects 4th Street and 6th Street,
thereby improving connectivity within the vicinity of the project site.
g.The project would not result in a negative effect to the City’s land use inventory
available for residential and economic development, consistent with the intent of the general plan land
use element. The project site proposes to be redesignated from a currently split-zoned orientation
between the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Districts to Neo-Industrial (NI) which
does not permit residential development. The site is already developed with a warehouse building, and
therefore redeveloping the site with two new warehouses will not result in the loss of any land use
inventory available for residential or economic development.
4.The Minor Use Permit, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment,
Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit and Development Agreement (collectively,
the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City
determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an
environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. . By
separate Resolution No. 2021-111, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and
determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111 is incorporated herein by reference, and made a part
hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the record on which
this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of the
Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the
Project..
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Council hereby approves the application for Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 subject to each and
every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
return receipt requested, to Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, at the address identified in City
records.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Page 716
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110
MUP DRC2021-00315 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
October 20, 2021
Page 6
Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of October 2021,
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 717
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 718
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 719
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 720
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 721
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 722
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 723
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 724
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 725
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 726
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 727
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 728
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 729
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 730
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 731
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 732
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 733
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 734
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 735
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 736
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 737
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 738
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 739
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 740
ORDINANCE NO. 987
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00180, BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND BRIDGE POINT RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, LLC, TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF
TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 2,175,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY
LOCATED APPROXIAMTELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA
ANITA, AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA
AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET
–APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51.
A.Recitals.
1.Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for Development
Agreement Amendment DRC2021-00180 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter
the subject Development Agreement is referred to as the “Application." Bridge Point Rancho
Cucamonga, LLC owns the property subject to the Development Agreement and is hereinafter
referred to as “Owner.”
2.On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the Application and adopted Resolution No. 21-63 recommending approval of
the Development Agreement.
3.On October 20, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
introducing for First Reading Ordinance 987 and concluded said hearing on that date.
4.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B.Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The Application applies to the approximately 91.39-acre project site which
comprises two parcels APN: 0229-283-50 and 0229-283-51. The project site is improved with
an existing 1,431,000 square foot industrial warehouse building and an existing 23,240 square
foot retail building and associated improvements such as parking areas, drive aisles, loading
areas, landscaped areas and a rail spur which serves properties to the east of the project site.
The site also includes an area comprising approximately 11-acres of vacant land which was
previously used as a vineyard. All existing improvements, with the exception of the rail spur,
will be demolished as part of this project.
b.Concurrent with this Application, the Applicant has also applied for General
Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267, Tentative
Attachment 11Page741
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00180 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 20, 2021
Page 2
Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, Design Review DRC2020-00202, Tree Removal Permit
DRC2020-00266, and Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315 to construct two new industrial
warehouse buildings on two new parcels of land: Parcel 1, totaling about 55 acres, will be
improved with Building 1 totaling approximately 1,422,500 square feet, including a mezzanine
not to exceed 25,000 square feet; Parcel 2, totaling about 30 acres, will be improved with
Building 2 totaling approximately 752,500 square feet, including a mezzanine not to exceed
16,000 square feet. Associated improvements include new parking, drive aisles, truck parking
and loading areas, and a new north-south public street located along the easterly boundary
of the project site which will connect 4th Street and 6th Street. Collectively, these approvals are
referred to herein as the “Project.”
c.The existing Land Use, General Plan ad Zoning Designations for the
project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse,
Commercial
Retail and
former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and General
Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI) Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI)
District
d.As part of the Project, and in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City has prepared Environmental Impact Report SCH No.
2020100056 (EIR), which analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project and
related approvals.
Page 742
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00180 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 20, 2021
Page 3
e.Pursuant to Section 17.22.060 of the Development Code, Development
Agreements have been determined to be beneficial to the public in that:
Development Agreements increase the certainty in the approval of
development projects, thereby preventing the waste of resources, reducing
the cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging investment in
and commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
Development Agreements provide assurance to the applicant for a
development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may
proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and
regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, thereby strengthening
the public planning process, encouraging private participation in
comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of
development.
Development Agreements enable the City to plan for and finance public
facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, sewerage, transportation,
drinking water, school, and utility facilities, thereby removing a serious
impediment to the development of new housing.”
The proposed Development Agreement Amendment is being made and entered into for the
Project to ensure that the above three goals are fulfilled.
SECTION 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs
1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a.The Application is consistent with the objectives, policies, and general land
uses specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans. The proposed
Development Agreement authorizes the construction and operation of the Project, subject to the
approval of the General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-
00267, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271, Design Review DRC2020-00202, Tree Removal
Permit DRC2020-00266 and Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315, respectively.
b.The Application is compatible and in conformity with public convenience,
general welfare, and good land use and zoning practice. The proposed Development Agreement
will increase certainty and provide assurances that any impacts from the Project will be offset,
including potential impacts to affordable housing stock through the payment of fees by the
developer.
c.The Application will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general
welfare of the City. The EIR prepared for the Project analyzed the Project’s potential
environmental effects and concluded that no significant environmental effects would be caused
by the Project after the incorporation of the required mitigation measures.
Page 743
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00180 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 20, 2021
Page 4
d. The Application will not adversely affect the orderly development of
property or the preservation of property values. The proposed Development Agreement
Amendment will prevent the inefficient use of resources, reduce the public cost of development,
and encourage comprehensive planning.
SECTION 4. The Development Agreement, in addition to the General Plan Amendment,
Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit and Minor
Use Permit (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the
Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the
potentially significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution No. 2021-111, the City Council
has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii)
adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2021-111
is incorporated herein by reference, and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The
documents and other materials that constitute the record on which this determination was made are
located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the
mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project.
SECTION 5. On the basis of the foregoing and the totality of the administrative record
before it, the City Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2020-00180 as shown in
Exhibit 1.
SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid,
or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or
effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Page 744
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 987
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00180 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 20, 2021
Page 5
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day
of October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Clerk
Page 745
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Janice C. Reynolds
City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. _______
REGARDING THE BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement” or this “Development Agreement”) is
made and entered into as of the “Effective Date” set forth herein, by and between BRIDGE POINT
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and the
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (“City”).
RECITALS
Section 1. On October 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(“Council”) adopted the following resolutions:
A. Resolution No. 2021-106, approving General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213;
B. Resolution No. 2021-108, approving Design Review DRC2020-00202;
C. Resolution No. 2021-107, approving Tentative Parcel Map 20271;
D. Resolution No. 2021-109, approving Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266;
E. Resolution No. 2021-110, approving Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315; and
F. Resolution No. 2021-111, certifying, after making appropriate findings, an
Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) identified as SCH No. 2020100056.
Section 2. On October 20, 2021, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 986 and
following second reading adopted Ordinance No. ____, approving Zoning Map Amendment
DRC2020-00267.
Section 3. Collectively, the resolutions identified in Section 1 of the recitals and
ordinance identified in Section 2 of the recitals (collectively, “Project Entitlements”)
amended the City’s land use regulations to allow the demolition of the existing buildings
on-site (a 23,240 square-foot (“sf”) retail building and a 1,431,000-sf warehouse building)
and associated improvements, and permit the redevelopment and operation of the site with
two high-cube warehouse buildings for a distribution/fulfillment center with ancillary office
space, including the 1,422,500 square foot (“sf”) Building 1 and 752,500 sf Building 2 along
Page 746
-2-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
with the construction of a new public roadway, internal drive aisles, parking, on -site
landscaping, lighting, and utility connections.
Section 4. California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. authorizes cities to
enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests
in real property for the development of such property. Developer is owner of the Site, as
defined below and generally described as a 91.4-acre site located at 12434 4th Street in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California comprising tax Assessor
Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0229-283-50 and -51, and has a legal interest in the real property
subject to this Agreement.
Section 5. City and Developer mutually desire to enter into this Development
Agreement to develop the Project in accordance with the terms set forth herein.
Section 6. On October 20, 2021, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 987 (the
“Approving Ordinance”), and following second reading adopted Ordinance No. ______,
thereby approving this Development Agreement between the City and Developer. The
Approving Ordinance is effective as of ________________. All requirements of the
California Environment Quality Act have been met with respect to the Project, Project
Entitlements, and this Agreement, and this Agreement is consistent with the City’s General
Plan.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the
following terms shall have the following meaning:
“Approving Ordinance” means Ordinance No. _______, which approved this Agreement.
“Building 1” means the 1,422,500 sf building identified as “Building 1” in the Development Plan.
“Building 2” means the 752,500 sf building identified as “Building 2” in the Development Plan.
“City” means the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
“Community Benefit Fee” means any fee required under Section 11(B) of this Agreement.
“Developer” means Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
“Development Plan” means those plans, specifications, and images attached hereto, collectively
marked as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference.
“Effective Date” shall mean the date that the Approving Ordinance becomes effective.
“ITE Manual” means the Institute of Traffic Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition.
Page 747
-2-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
“Material Handling Equipment” shall mean all equipment intended for use in connection with the
Project’s operation for the purpose of loading or unloading goods and materials, including all
forklifts.
“MMRP” shall refer to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the Project’s
Final EIR and on file in City’s Planning Department.
“Non-Sort” means a fulfillment center that ships large box items that are processed primarily with
automation rather than through manual means, as defined in the ITE Manual, and as further
described in the Project’s Draft EIR.
“Project” means the proposed development of the Site, consistent with the terms and conditions of
the Project Entitlements.
“Project Entitlements” mean the Resolutions and Ordinance described in recitals Sections 1
through 3.
“Site” means the real property that is the subject of the Project Entitlements and as legally
described, depicted and identified in Exhibit “A”.
“Sort” means a fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically
by manual means, as defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the Project’s Draft
EIR.
“Term” means the initial six (6) year term of this Agreement, beginning from the Effective Date,
and any extension pursuant to Section 6.
“TIA” means the Project’s final traffic impact analyses for Non-Sort Uses included in the
application for the Project Entitlements and on file in the City’s Engineering Services Department,
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of this Agreement and shall be enforceable
as any other provision of this Agreement.
Section 3. Interest of Developer. Developer warrants and represents that, as of the
Effective Date, it will have legal title to or an equitable interest in the Site; that it has full
legal right to enter into this Agreement; and that the persons executing this Agreement on
behalf of Developer have been duly authorized to do so.
Section 4. Binding Effect of Agreement. Developer hereby subjects the Project and
the Site to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The
City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations
and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and
shall pass to and be binding upon Developer’s successors and assigns in title or interest to
the Project and/or Site. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter
executed, covering or conveying the Project and/or Site or any portion thereof shall
conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the
covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether
Page 748
-3-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other
instrument.
The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of
such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and
increasing the enjoyment and use of the Site by Developer and the future occupants of the Project,
the intended beneficiaries of such covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the
public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted.
Section 5. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship
between City and Developer is such that City and Developer are each an independent party
and neither is the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever and neither shall
be considered to be the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever.
Section 6. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the
Effective Date and shall continue for six (6) consecutive calendar years thereafter, unless
the Term is otherwise terminated, modified, or extended in accordance with the provisions
of this Agreement. So long as there are no material changes to the Project, the Developer
is not then in breach beyond the notice and cure periods set forth in this Agreement, and the
Developer has made all payments to the City as required pursuant to this Agreement,
Developer has an option to extend the Term one time for an additional nine (9) years for a
total Term of fifteen (15) years. To exercise this option, Developer must, no less than ninety
(90) days’ prior to the expiration of the Term, both: (i) provide City with written notice of
the intent to exercise the option and (ii) pay to City two million dollars ($2,000,000.00).
Upon receipt of such notice and payment, City shall provide written confirmation that the
Developer’s option to extend the Term has been exercised and accepted. The Term shall
not be extended until City provides written confirmation to Developer, which notice shall
not be unreasonably withheld and shall be provided prior to the expiration of the Agreement
provided that Developer has provided required notice and full payment.
Section 7. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in
Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the
parties to provide for the timing of development resulting in a later adopted initiative
restricting the timing of development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the
parties’ intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Developer shall
have the right (without obligation), subject to the provisions of this Development
Agreement, to complete the Project in such order and at such rate and at such times as
Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment.
Section 8. Assignment. In the event of a proposed transfer of interest in the Site or
any portion thereof or in this Agreement by Developer to a transferee, Developer agrees to
comply with the following conditions:
(i) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall
provide the City with written notice thereof along with written evidence and
documentation, of a form and substance satisfactory to the City,
demonstrating the experience, capability, competence and financial ability
Page 749
-4-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
of the proposed assignee to carry out and complete Development Plan and
comply with the terms of this Agreement.
(ii) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall also
provide satisfactory evidence that the transferee will assume in writing
through an assignment and assumption agreement all remaining obligations
of Developer under this Agreement. The assignment and assumption
agreement shall be in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney.
(iii) The City Manager shall have consented to the assignment of this
Agreement, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
Any assignment of this Agreement not made in strict compliance with the foregoing
conditions shall constitute an event of default by the Developer pursuant to Section 18.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall
be binding upon any transferee whether or not such an assignment and assumption
agreement is signed by the assignee upon acquiring the Property.
Section 9. General Standards and Restrictions Pertaining to Development of the
Site. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this
Development Agreement:
A. Developer shall have the right to develop and operate the Project on the Site in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Project Entitlements and City
shall have the right to control development of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement and the Project Entitlements.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no Sort use shall be
operated on the Site during the useful life of the Project’s two buildings. Due to City’s reliance
on the traffic mitigation identified in this Agreement and the Draft EIR pertaining solely to Non-
Sort uses, this provision shall survive expiration of this Agreement.
C. The type, density, intensity, configuration of uses, size, and location of buildings
and other improvements and provisions for the reservation or dedication of land for public
purposes, location of public improvements, together with other terms and conditions of
development applicable to the Site, shall be as set forth in this Development Agreement, including
the Development Plan, and the Project Entitlements, except as modifications may be made
pursuant to Section 16.
D. All public improvements, including landscaping, irrigation, sidewalk, traffic
improvements and public streets, as set forth in the Development Plan, Project Entitlements, and
this Development Agreement, shall be installed by the Developer in the time and manner described
in the Development Plan, Project Entitlements, and this Development Agreement.
Section 10. Effect of City Regulations on Development of Project. Developer is
entitled to protections afforded by the development agreement statute, Government Code
Section 65864 et seq., including a vested right to develop the Project site in accordance with
the rules, regulations and official policies in effect as of the Effective Date. The City
Page 750
-5-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
acknowledges that, pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.02.020,
Ordinance No. 982 does not apply to the Project’s Entitlements which are governed by the
regulations in effect when the applications were deemed complete (March 11, 2021) except
as expressly addressed herein. No future modification of City’s code or ordinances, or
adoption of any code, ordinance, regulation, whether adopted by the City Council or through
the initiative or referendum process, which conflicts with this Agreement shall apply to the
Property or modify this Agreement without amendment hereto to so provide by the parties.
A. The provisions of this Section 10 shall not preclude the application to the
development of the Site those changes in City ordinances, regulations, plans, or specifications
which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations as
provided in California Government Code Section 65869.5 or any successor provision or
provisions. In the event such changes in the law prevent or preclude compliance with one or more
of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or
suspended or performance thereof delayed, as may be necessary to comply with such changes in
the law.
B. The category of Development Impact Fees (“DIF”) applicable to the Project shall
be those in effect as of the Agreement’s Effective Date (i.e. new DIF categories which may be
adopted by the City after the Agreement’s Effective Date shall not apply to the Project), however
the existing DIF and other development fees associated with the construction and development of
the Project, including but not limited to land use approvals, development fees, building permits,
etc., shall be pursuant to the rates as annually adjusted and in effect at the time application is made
for such approvals or permits.
C. Nothing herein shall prevent the application of health, safety, and accessibility
regulations (e.g., fire, building, seismic, plumbing, and electric codes and requirements under the
Americans with Disabilities Act or similar accessibility statute) that become applicable to the City
as a whole.
D. The parties acknowledge and agree that the City is restricted in its authority to limit
its police power by contract and that the limitations, reservations and exceptions set forth in this
Section 10 are intended to reserve to the City all of its police power which cannot be so limited.
Section 11. Developer’s Obligations. In consideration of the rights and benefits
Developer is guaranteed under this Agreement, the Developer agrees to provide each and
every one of the community benefits and other measures set forth in this Section 11.
A. Material Handling Equipment. Designation of City of Rancho Cucamonga as Point
of Sale for Material Handling Equipment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designated as
the point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. Developer
shall include a requirement in all tenant leases that tenants shall designate the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as the point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s
operations. City shall be a third party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases.
B. Community Benefit Fee. Developer shall pay to City the Community Benefit Fees
in the amount and schedule as set forth below. The Community Benefit Fees are intended to
Page 751
-6-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
address affordable housing demand, fire protection services, environmental justice, and related
increases to City services associated with warehouse development.
i. Community Benefit Fee amount and schedule:
Payment Amount Due
Payment 1 $3,000,000.00 Upon issuance of a grading permit, provided
that no grading permit shall be issued until the
fee is paid.
Payment 2a $650,000.00 Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for Building 1, provided that no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued until the fee is paid.
Payment 2b $350,000.00 Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for Building 2, provided that no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued under the fee is paid.
Payment 3a $1,000,000.00 Upon the third anniversary of issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy for Building 1
Payment 3b $500,000.00 Upon the third anniversary of issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy Building 2
Payment 4a $2,250,000.00 Upon the fifth anniversary of issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy Building 1
Payment 4b $1,250,000.00 Upon the fifth anniversary of issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy Building 2
ii. If a Community Benefit Fee payment is scheduled to be due, pursuant to the
schedule above, after the Term of this Agreement, then such community benefit fee payment shall
automatically become due and owing on the final day of the Term. Developer may pay any of the
Community Benefit Fee payments in advance of the scheduled due date, which early payment shall
reduce the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflationary increase applied to such payments
pursuant to paragraph (v) below.
iii. If Developer has not received a building permit for construction of the
second building’s structure (whether Building 1 or Building 2) within twenty-four (24) months of
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first building, then Developer shall pay an additional
one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) Community Benefit Fee to City, due no later than twenty -six
(26) months from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first building, in order to
compensate for the deferred payment of the second building’s Community Benefit Fees. Whether
Building 1 or Building 2 is the first building constructed depends on Developer’s Project phasing.
iv. Except for Payment 1 described above, up to fifty percent (50%) of the
Community Benefit Fees received by City for Buildings 1 and/or 2, as identified in paragraph (i) of
paragraph B of this Section 11, shall be refunded to Developer if, within the Term of this
Agreement, a Project tenant generates five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) in sales tax to
the City annually for any three (3) consecutive years, provided that Developer can demonstrate
that the tenant responsible for generating five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) in sales tax
received by the City for any three (3) consecutive year period has a lease covering the entire Term
of this Agreement. The refund shall correspond to the Project building in which the tenant has met
the requirements of this paragraph and shall be paid to Developer thirty (30) days following the
Page 752
-7-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
expiration of the Term. By way of example only, if the tenant of Building 1 generates five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000.00) during each of years three, four, and five of the Term, then City
shall refund to Developer an amount equal to fifty (50) percent of payments 2a, 3a, and/or 4a
received by City within thirty days following the conclusion of the Term. The City shall have no
further reimbursement obligation after this Agreement has expired.
v. Any Community Benefit Fee payment made after the first anniversary of
the Effective Date of this Agreement is considered a deferred Community Benefit Fee payment
and is subject to a CPI-based inflationary increase, if any, based on the CPI – All Urban Consumers
for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California as published by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics (or any successor thereto). Under no circumstance will the amount of
each deferred Community Benefit Fee payment be lower than the amount identified in the table
above.
vi. Payment of the Community Benefit Fees above shall satisfy all but two
hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) of Developer’s public art requirements under Ordinance
912 (codified at Chapter 17.124 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code), which may be
satisfied either through the procurement of art or payment of an in-lieu fee.
vii. Payment of the Community Benefit Fees above shall fully satisfy any future
commercial linkage fee adopted by the City, even if said fees are higher than the amounts specified
above.
viii. Late Charges, Interest. If Developer fails to pay a Community Benefit Fee
payment by the due date, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) of such
delinquency in accordance with Section 24. If Developer fails to pay the Community Benefit Fee
within thirty (30) days after such notice is served on Developer (the “Period to Cure”) then
Developer shall pay a late charge in the amount equal to one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the
Community Benefit Fee due but not paid. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the amount of
the costs and expenses that City will incur in the event the Community Benefit Fee is not paid
when due is extremely difficult to calculate, and that the late charge set forth in the immediately
preceding sentence is a reasonable, good faith estimate of such costs and expenses, but payment
of such late charge shall not limit the City’s remedies following any default by Developer under
this Agreement. If any Community Benefit Fee, is not paid within the Period to Cure, then such
Community Benefit Fee (including any late charge) shall also bear interest, from the due date until
paid, at the rate that is the lesser of (i) ten percent (10%) per annum, or (ii) the highest rate
permitted by applicable law.
C. Traffic Improvements. Developer shall submit off-site plans that meet or exceed
the ninety percent (90%) design stage for Catherine Bridge Place, 4th Street, and 6th Street, as
determined by the City Engineer, for issuance of a grading permit.
i. Timing of Traffic Improvements. The traffic improvements identified in
paragraph (ii) below shall be completed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, no later than by
issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the Project’s first building (whether Building 1 or
Building 2). However, in the event that Developer is unable to complete the improvements by
issuance of certificate of occupancy of the Project’s first building, despite Developer’s
Page 753
-8-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
commercially reasonable efforts, due to processing, required coordination with other projects, or
other issues outside of Developer’s control, then Developer shall issue a bond, satisfactory in form
and value to the City Engineer, for the remaining work and shall be obligated to complete the
required improvements within one year of issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project’s
first building. For those improvements identified below requiring coordination and approval by
Caltrans, City shall cooperate with Developer on Developer’s efforts to obtain Caltrans approval;
however, if Developer is unable to achieve 90% plan check review, as determined by the City
Engineer, despite best efforts due to processing delays by Caltrans, then issuance of grading and
building permits for the Project shall not be delayed provided that all other requirements for
issuance of grading and building permits have been met. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City
will only issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for the Project until the improvements that
require Caltrans approval are completed. Unless the improvements are completed within one year,
the temporary certificate of occupancy shall expire, unless an extension is mutually agreed to by
both Parties.
ii. Traffic Improvements. Developer shall construct the following traffic
improvements consistent with the demands outlined in the Project’s TIA for a Non-Sort use and
determined necessary by the City Engineer:
a. I-15 NB Ramps & 4th St: Modify the traffic signal to implement a
130-second cycle length;
b. Etiwanda Ave. & Foothill Blvd: Modify the timing of existing
traffic signals between the I-15 and East Avenue to optimize traffic signal coordination along
Foothill Boulevard by implementing a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour; and
c. I-15 SB Ramps & Ontario Mills Dr./4th St: Modify the traffic signal
to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the WB right turn lane, restripe
the SB approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn lanes, and
modify the traffic signal to implement overlap phasing for NB and SB right turn lanes. Developer
may receive reimbursement of fifty percent (50%) of the actual cost of the improvements in this
paragraph c. if the improvements are first constructed by Developer and the same improvements
are also required to be constructed by the Speedway Commerce Center project located on APNs
0229-291-54 and 0229-291-46. Alternatively, if the improvement is first constructed by the
Speedway Commerce Center project, then Developer shall pay a reimbursement to the City, which
will be passed through to the Speedway Commerce Center project’s developer, equal to fifty
percent (50%) of the actual cost of the improvements and is not required to construct the
improvements.
iii. Developer’s provision of traffic improvements pursuant to this
Section 11(C) will satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to the impacts mitigated by the
required traffic improvements described above.
D. Fair Share Payment to Remaining Traffic Improvements. Developer shall pay a
fair share fee into the City’s Industrial Area Traffic Improvement Fund, equivalent to the amounts
calculated in the TIA for a non-Sort use: $37,089 (the “Fair Share Fee”). The Fair Share Fee shall
be due prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. Developer’s payment
Page 754
-9-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
of the Fair Share Fee for remaining traffic improvements pursuant to this Section 11(D) will satisfy
any Condition of Approval pertaining to required contributions to the City’s Industrial Area Traffic
Improvement Fund for impacts mitigated by the improvements listed in the TIA for the Non-Sort
use but not required to be constructed in Section 11(C)(ii).
E. New Public Street. Developer shall construct, consistent with the City’s standards
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, a new public street (known as Catherine Bridge Place)
on the east side of the Project site between 4th and 6th Streets, to be classified as an Industrial
Collector (66-foot full-width right-of-way), as shown in Exhibit C of this Agreement depicting the
proposed cross section for Catherine Bridge Place with one travel lane, landscaped parkway in
each direction, and a sidewalk on the west side of the street. Developer shall be responsible for all
costs associated with the design and construction of the new public street. City shall accept
dedication of the public street and the related improvements in the same manner as it accepts other
similar public improvements constructed as part of private development pr ojects in the City upon
completion of the public street and related improvements. Developer shall provide a standard one-
year warranty for the improvements, excluding normal roadway wear and tear. No certificate of
occupancy for any Project component will be issued for the Project until the improvements are
completed and accepted by City which the City shall not unreasonably delay. Developer’s
provision of a new public street pursuant to this Section 11(E) will satisfy any Condition of
Approval pertaining to required provision of a new public street on the east side of the Project site
between 4th and 6th Streets.
F. 6th Street At-Grade Crossing Contribution. Developer shall work in good faith with
the City in its effort to acquire and obtain approval from the California Public Utility Commission
and BNSF Railway to permit an at-grade, railroad spur crossing at 6th Street connecting the existing
roadway on either side of the railroad (6th Street Crossing”); provided, however, that such efforts
by Developer do not include changes to the Project or monetary expenditures by Developer outside
of the in-lieu fee described below. Developer shall pay one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) as an
in-lieu fee to City and contribution toward the 6th Street Crossing. The fee required pursuant to
this Section 11(F) shall be due upon the issuance of the first building permit for the Project.
Developer’s contribution to the City to achieve the 6th Street Crossing will satisfy any Condition
of Approval pertaining to the 6th Street Crossing.
G. Financing Districts. The City may initiate (i) proceedings to form one or more
special assessment districts (each, an “Assessment District”) to levy special benefit assessments
(the “Special Benefit Assessments”) or (ii) proceedings to form one or more Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Sections 53311 et seq.) Community
Facilities Districts (each, a “CFD,” and collectively, with the Assessment Districts, the “Districts,”
or individually, a “District”) to levy special taxes (the “CFD Taxes”), to finance the construction
or acquisition of public facilities, including but not limited to the construction of eligible street
improvements, right-of-ways, appurtenant facilities, and other authorized improvements
benefiting properties within the City’s industrial zoning districts, and the maintenance and
operation of public streets, parkways, medians, public right-of-ways, public safety, and any other
improvements or services benefiting properties within all industrial zones throughout the City (the
“Facilities and Services”). Developer shall not oppose the formation of any District or the
annexation of lands to any District, and shall vote in favor of any such Special Benefit Assessments
or CFD Taxes for a District; provided, however, that in no event shall the annual total, combined
Page 755
-10-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
amount of the Special Benefit Assessments and CFD Taxes for the Districts exceed forty-nine
thousand, one-hundred and seventy dollars ($49,170.00) per acre for the Site (the “Max Levy”).
The Max Levy shall increase annually by an amount determined necessary to fund the Facilities
and Services, but such annual increase shall be no less than two percent (2%) and no more than
six percent (6%). Developer shall satisfy its obligations under this paragraph G. prior to the
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. The provisions of this paragraph G.
shall not apply to or affect the validity of any existing Assessment District or CFD applicable to
the Site as of the Effective Date.
H. Solar Panels and Purchase Agreement. Developer shall install a solar collector
system that covers a percentage of the Project’s total roof area, with such percentage based on the
formula outlined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.76.020(B), as amended by
Ordinance No. 982, which requires in part that the renewable energy system shall be built to
generate an amount of electricity sufficient to meet the following criteria: (a) annualized building
demand based on the approved use; and (b) annualized demand required to charge fully electric
vehicles and trucks, assuming that all vehicles and trucks to the site are fully electric; and (c) a
reasonable rate of efficiency loss over 10 years. Such percentage shall be established pursuant to
a study to be prepared by Developer and approved by the City, with City review time fully
reimbursed by the Developer and paid prior to any issuance of the first building permit. The final
percentage of required roof area coverage shall be confirmed by the Cit y Engineer. The Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Utility (“RCMU”) and Developer agree to execute a power purchase
agreement, a draft of which is attached as Exhibit “D” to this Agreement (“Power Purchase
Agreement”), within six (6) months of the Effective Date, provided that no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued for the Project until the Power Purchase Agreement is executed. The
solar collector system shall be metered separately from the metered power usage demand of the
Project’s two buildings. The Power Purchase Agreement will commit the City to purchase all
electricity produced by the Project at market rate for at least 25 years, which market rate shall be
specified in the executed Power Purchase Agreement.
I. RCMU Connection. The Project shall utilize RCMU for electricity and high-speed
broadband provided that within ten (10) months of City Council approval of the Project, RCMU
has brought all required infrastructure for electricity and high-speed broadband (“Required
Infrastructure”) to the Project site at the locations identified in Exhibit “E” at RCMU’s sole cost
and expense. “Required Infrastructure” shall include all underground ducts and structures and
surface mounted equipment (except for transformers) and cabling to serve both buildings on the
property. This requirement shall satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to the Project’s
electric and fiber optic connection to RCMU.
J. Other City Fees. Developer is responsible for other applicable existing
development fees, with the exception of any public arts fees required by Ordinance 912, except
that Developer shall be liable for two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) public arts
requirement, which may be satisfied by Developer as either through the procurement of art or
payment of an in-lieu fee.
K. MMRP Compliance Costs. The MMRP includes mitigation measures applicable
to the Project that may require City to verify compliance outside of City’s plan check process for
the Project. Accordingly, Developer shall reimburse City for all compliance costs, including City
Page 756
-11-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
staff and consultant time and expenses, incurred in verifying Developer’s compliance with the
MMRP, except for such costs associated with mitigation measures that are verified during plan
check and recovered by City through development fees. City shall submit an invoice for such
costs on an as-needed basis and Developer shall pay the invoice to City within thirty (30) days of
receipt.
L. Developer’s obligations under this Section 11 may extend past the Term of this
Agreement. Therefore, this Section 11 shall survive the expiration or termination of the Term;
provided, however, that upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 27 below, all of
Developer’s obligations hereunder shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.
Section 12. City’s Obligations. The City shall reasonably expedite review and
processing of all plans and issuance of all permits associated with the Project. The City
shall refund not more than fifty percent (50%) of the community Benefit Fee payments
identified in Section 11(B)(i), exclusive of Payment 1, consistent with and provided the
provisions and conditions of Section 11(B)(iv) are satisfied.
Section 13. Annual Review. During the Term of this Development Agreement, City
shall annually review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terms of
this Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual report with the City providing
information regarding compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement no later
than sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of the Effective Date. Annual reports shall
include all information necessary for the City to assess Developer’s compliance with the
terms and provisions of this Agreement. Developer shall have the right to cause the annual
report to be filed by any lessee then occupying the Site provided, however, that Developer
shall remain primarily responsible for such filing. The City shall deliver a copy of the
findings of each annual review to each Lender (if such Lender’s address is provided to the
City) concurrently with delivering such findings to Developer.
Section 14. Indemnification and Legal Challenge. To the maximum extent permitted
by law, Developer agrees to, and shall, defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected
officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents, and employees
(“Indemnitees”) harmless from liability for damage and/or claims for damage for personal
injuries, including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other
actions and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of
Developer’s activities in connection with the construction of the Project or Developer’s
operation of the permitted use, and which may arise from the direct or indirect operations
of Developer or those of Developer’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other
persons acting on Developer’s behalf, which relate to the Developer’s construction of the
Project or operation of the permitted use. This indemnity provision applies to all damages
and claims for damage, as described above, regardless of whether or not the City prepared,
supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project.
Notwithstanding, the foregoing indemnity shall not include indemnification against (i) suits
and actions brought by Developer by reason of City's default or alleged default hereunder,
or (ii) suits and actions caused solely by or resulting solely from City's acts or omissions, or
(iii) suits and actions arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City;
Page 757
-12-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
provided further, however, that the foregoing indemnity shall not apply to claims pertaining
to City’s operation of those portions of the Site dedicated to City after the dedication thereof.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of
any provision of this Agreement, any of the Project Entitlements including, without
limitation, the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Design Review, EIR, or any other
supporting document relating to the Project, the Developer shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses
incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to s uch
action. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree
to cooperate in defending such action. In the event of any litigation challenging the
effectiveness of this Agreement, or any portion hereof, this Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect while such litigation, including any appellate review, is pending, unless
otherwise ordered by the court. Absent issuance of an injunction, the Developer may elect
to continue development under this Agreement pending completion of the litigation but it
shall do so at its sole risk, and the City shall not be liable for any loss suffered as a result
thereof.
Section 15. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or
in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in
California Government Code Section 65868, et seq., or successor provisions thereto.
Section 16. Minor Amendments to Development Plan. Upon the written application
of Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development Plan, including
modifications to the building design or footprint affecting setbacks, parking layout and
design, and landscape design may be approved by the Planning Director. Substantial
changes in the Development Plan, as determined by the Planning Director, shall be
processed through the process required by law to amend or modify the Development Plan.
Upon the approval of substantial changes to the Development Plan, Developer and City
shall amend this Agreement to memorialize and acknowledge the revised Development
Plan.
Section 17. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this
Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) by
registered or certified mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement, and if such
violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after
such notice is served on Developer, or if not corrected within such reasonable time as may
be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within said
thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within
said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may,
without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such
declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the
obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement,
apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer
of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate.
Page 758
-13-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Section 18. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the
happening of one or more of the following events or conditions:
A. If a material warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Developer
to City set forth herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein is false or proved to
have been false in any material respect when it was made;
B. If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant
to Section 13 hereinabove, upon the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied
in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and
opportunity to cure as described in Section 17 hereinabove; or
C. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after
notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Section 17 hereinabove.
Section 19. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in
performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce this Agreement.
Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of
the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of
a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. Subject to the provisions of Section 20,
all other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement
are available to each party to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development
Agreement by the other party (subject to applicable notice and cure periods). No waiver by
City or Developer of any breach or default under this Development Agreement by the other
party shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default
hereunder.
Section 20. City Not Liable For Damages. It is acknowledged by the parties that the
City would not have entered into this Agreement if it could be held liable in damages under
or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Consequently, and except for
the payment of attorney’s fees in accordance with this Agreement, the City shall not be
liable in damages to the Developer, or to any assignee, transferee or any other person, and
the Developer covenants on behalf of itself and its successors in interest not to sue for or
claim any damages:
A. For any breach of this Agreement;
B. For the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or
provided hereunder or pursuant hereto;
C. Arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the
application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement; or
D. For any injury to or interference with the rights of the property owner, allegedly or
actually arising out of, or incurred in connection with, the parties entering this Agreement, or their
exercise of any rights under this Agreement.
Page 759
-14-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
The parties hereby warrant that each enters into this Agreement with the understanding that if the
City defaults on its obligations under this Agreement due to an action taken by the electorate of
the City in the exercise of the reserved powers of initiative and referendum, this Agreement shall
be modified or suspended to the extent required by Government Code Section 65869.5 and the
Developer’s right to seek specific performance, a writ of mandate, or other mandatory relief shall
be limited by such force as the action taken by the electorate may have in light of state law as
determined by any court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the Developer’s principal remedy
shall lie in reformation of this Agreement
Section 21. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or
cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on (i) the Project, or any part thereof, the
beneficiary of said encumbrance or lien (“Mortgage Lender”) and (ii) any direct ownership
interest in Developer, the beneficiary of said encumbrance or lien (“Mezzanine Lender”;
together with Mortgage Lender, “Lenders” and each or any of the foregoing a “Lender”)
shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said
encumbrance or lien to:
A. Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, or cure any default
of Developer under this Agreement within the time limits set forth in Section 17, and any such act
or thing done or performed by Lender or cure shall be as effective as if done by Developer;
B. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising
foreclosure proceedings or power of sale, assignment in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedy
afforded in law or in equity or by the pledge or security document evidencing the encumbrance or
lien (hereinafter referred to as “a trust deed”);
C. Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at
any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant
to a power of sale contained in a trust deed or otherwise, or to Lender or its nominee or designee
by an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, and to the first transferee thereafter (each of the foregoing
a, “Successor Developer”);
D. Lender or its nominee or designee acquires and succeeds to the interest of
Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to
a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a pledge or trust deed or otherwise, or by
an assignment in lieu of foreclosure; and
E. Upon request from any Lender, the City or Developer shall deliver to the Lender
so requesting within 30 days of such request an estoppel certifying, among other thing, compliance
with this Agreement by City and Developer, if true, Lender’s rights under this Agreement and such
other matters as such Lender may request.
Should any Lender require or request an amendment of this Agreement in respect of the rights and
remedies granted to a Lender, City hereby agrees to execute and deliver such an amendment so
long as the proposed amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights, powers, and
remedies of the City in respect of a default by Developer hereunder. No Successor Developer shall
be liable for any act or omission of the prior Developer (provided that this sentence shall not relieve
Page 760
-15-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
any Successor Developer from curing an on-going breach or default, other than any Incurable
Default, that is continuing as of the date such Successor Developer acquires its direct or indirect
interest in the Project). No Successor Developer shall have any additional liability hereunder
accruing after the date on which such Successor Developer transfers, conveys or otherwise assigns
this Agreement as permitted hereunder and such transferee or assignee thereof has assumed th is
Agreement. No modification or amendment of, or that otherwise impairs any right under, Section
21, 22 or 23 of this Agreement, entered into prior to any Successor Developer acquiring its direct
or indirect interest in the Project, shall be binding upon such Successor Developer unless such
Successor Developer has consented to same in writing.
Section 22. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach
under this Agreement by Developer to Lender (if known by City) simultaneously with such
notice of default City gives to Developer and afford Lender the opportunity after receipt of
service of the notice to:
A. Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice, where
the default can be cured by the payment of money;
B. Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice where
the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured
within that time; or
C. Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where
something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and ca nnot be
performed within thirty (30) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default
are commenced within a thirty (30) day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by
City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender.
D. The foregoing cure period shall run successively and not concurrently with the cure
period of Borrower and each other Lender such that the time limits set forth in Section 17 shall not
commence with respect to Mezzanine Lender until they have expired as to Mortgage Lender and
shall not commence as to Mortgage Lender until they have expired as to Mezzanine Lender, in
each such case, with the applicable default not having been cured.
E. All cure periods contained herein shall be extended day for day during any period
in which any Lender is prohibited, delayed, prevented or enjoined from commencing or pursing
any rights or remedies it may have under the pledge, trust deed or other related loan documents by
any legal process or proceedings, including, without limitation, any bankruptcy or other insolvency
proceedings affecting Developer.
F. If the breach or default is of a type that cannot reasonably be cured by any Lender
(each an “Incurable Default”) (for example, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
a bankruptcy of Borrower), the City will not exercise any remedies on account of such Incurable
Default if any Lender proceeds promptly and diligently to obtain possession of the Project through
appropriate foreclosure proceedings and diligently prosecutes same to completion in accordance
with Section 23 below.
Page 761
-16-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
G. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be construed as obligating any Lender to
cure any breach or default or perform any obligation of Borrower under any Development
Agreement; provided that if any Lender elects to perform any obligation of Developer under any
Development Agreement the parties thereto agree to accept such performance as if undertaken by
Developer.
Section 23. Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the
terms of this Agreement by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its
encumbrance or lien on the Project. The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure
of the encumbrance by order of court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power
of sale contained in the instrument creating the encumbrance or lien, or by an assignment in
lieu of foreclosure. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the
City for the default or breach by Developer unless:
A. Subject to Section 22(E) above, they are commenced within thirty (30) days after
the later of (i) service on Developer (and on Lender if such Lender’s address is provided to the
City) of the notice described hereinabove and (ii) the expiration of the cure periods afforded to
Developer in Section 17 and, in the case of Mortgage Lender, the expiration of the cure periods
afforded to Mezzanine Lender in Section 23;
B. They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required
by law to completion; and
C. Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this
Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure
proceedings or assignment in lieu of foreclosure are complete or are discharged by redemption,
satisfaction, or payment.
Section 24. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement
shall be provided by email and certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the
respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified
by the parties hereto.
To Developer:
Heather Crossner
Senior Vice President, Development
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
11100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Email: hcrossner@bridgeindustrial.com
and
Legal Department
Page 762
-17-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Bridge Industrial
9525 West Bryn Mawr, Suite 700
Rosemont, IL 60018
Email: dhemmer@bridgeindustrial.com
To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730
Attention: City Manager
Email: JGillison@Cityofrc.us
With a Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 S. Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attention: Nicholas R. Ghirelli
Email: nghirelli@rwglaw.com
To Mortgage Lender: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
[______]
[______]
Attention: [______]
Email: [______]
With a Copy to: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
[______]
[______]
Attention: [______]
Email: [______]
Section 25. Attorneys’ Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this
Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall
be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees incurred
during the proceeding (including appeals) as may be fixed within the discretion of the court.
Section 26. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens
hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
Section 27. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, this
Agreement may be terminated at any time upon the written mutual agreement of both
parties.
Section 28. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in
accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action
or litigation brought for breach or to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be the
Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, California.
Page 763
-18-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Section 29. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to
be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, or enforceability of the remaining
provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
Section 30. Recordation. The City Clerk shall record this Agreement in the Official
Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino within ten (10) business
days following the Effective Date. Upon the expiration of the terms of this Agreement and
the request of the Property Owner, the City will execute and deliver, in recordable form, an
instrument confirming that this Agreement is terminated and of no further force or effect.
Section 31. Force Majeure. In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or
hindered or prevented from performance of any act required hereunder by reason of acts of
God, strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, riots, insurrection,
terrorism, war or other reason of similar nature not the fault of the party delayed in
performing the work or doing the acts required under the terms of this Agreement, then the
performance of such act shall be excused for the period of the delay caused by the foregoing.
Financial inability shall not be deemed an excuse for delay under this Section 31.
Section 32. Integrated Agreement. This Development Agreement consists of this
Agreement together with all Exhibits attached hereto, and all of the same are hereby
incorporated by reference. The provisions of this Agreement shall govern over any
inconsistent or conflicting provisions set forth in the Exhibits. No representation or
promise, verbal or written, not expressly set forth herein shall be binding or have any force
or effect.
Section 33. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in every provision hereof in which
time is a factor.
Section 34. Operating Memoranda. The provisions of this Agreement require a close
degree of cooperation between the City and Developer. The anticipated refinements to the
Project may demonstrate that clarifications to this Agreement and the Project Entitlements
are appropriate with respect to the implementation of this Agreement and the Project
Entitlements. If, when, and as it becomes necessary or appropriate to take implementing
actions or make such changes, adjustments or clarifications, the Parties may effectuate such
actions, changes, adjustments or clarifications through an operating memorandum
(“Operating Memorandum”) approved by the parties in writing which references this
Section. Such Operating Memorandum shall not require public notices and hearings or an
amendment to this Agreement unless it is required by Sections 15 or 16 above. The City
Manager shall be authorized, after consultation with and approval of Developer, to
determine whether a requested adjustment, clarification or implementing action (i) may be
effectuated pursuant to this Section 34 and is consistent with the intent and purpose of this
Agreement and the Project Entitlements or (ii) is of the type that would constitute an
amendment to this Agreement and thus would require compliance with the provisions of
Section 15 or Section 16 above. The authority to enter into such Operating Memorandum
is hereby delegated to the City Manager, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute any Operating Memorandum hereunder without further City Council action.
Page 764
-19-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
Page 765
-20-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective
on the Effective Date set forth hereinabove.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a Municipal Corporation
Dated:
By:
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
DEVELOPER:
(Signatures of two principals required)
Dated:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds
City Clerk
Dated:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Approved as to form:
James L. Markman
City Attorney
Page 766
-21-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of San Bernardino )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 767
-22-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of San Bernardino )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 768
A-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
EXHIBIT “A-1”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Page 769
A-2-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Page 770
A-2-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
EXHIBIT “A-2”
SITE MAP
Page 771
B-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
EXHIBIT “B”
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT; TO BE ADDED PRIOR TO RECORDING
Page 772
C-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
EXHIBIT “C”
Cross Section - Catherine Bridge Place
Page 773
D-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
EXHIBIT “D”
Draft Power Purchase Agreement
INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE
POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
between
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
and
________
Page 774
INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT
RENEWABLE POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
D-2
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED ......................................................................................... 3
2. SELLER’S FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE .................... 3
3. CONTRACT CAPACITY AND QUANTITY; TERM; CONTRACT PRICE;
BILLING; COLLATERAL REQUIREMENT .......................................................... 6
4. GREEN ATTRIBUTES; RESOURCE ADEQUACY BENEFITS; ERR
REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 10
5. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES; COVENANTS ................................. 11
6. GENERAL CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 13
7. INDEMNITY ............................................................................................................... 17
8. LIMITATION OF DAMAGES .................................................................................. 17
9. INSURANCE ............................................................................................................... 18
10. NOTICES ..................................................................................................................... 21
11. FORCE MAJEURE .................................................................................................... 21
12. EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION .................................................... 22
13. GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES ............................................................................... 25
14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND RECORDING CONVERSATION .......... 25
15. ASSIGNMENT ............................................................................................................ 26
16. GOVERNING LAW .................................................................................................... 26
17. DISPUTE RESOLUTION .......................................................................................... 26
18. MISCELLANEOUS .................................................................................................... 27
APPENDIX A – DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................. 30
APPENDIX B – COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE CONFIRMATION LETTER ................... 40
APPENDIX C – FORECASTING REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 41
APPENDIX D – DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY ........................................................................ 42
APPENDIX E – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE PPA MILESTONES AND
EXAMPLE ACTION STEPS ..................................................................................... 43
APPENDIX F – NOTICES LIST ............................................................................................................ 45
APPENDIX G – FORM OF LETTER OF CREDIT ............................................................................. 47
APPENDIX H – FORM OF CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT .............................................................. 50
Page 775
D-3
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of California (“Buyer” or “RCMU”), and _________(“Seller”), a
________________, hereby enter into this Power Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) made and
effective as of the Execution Date. Seller and Buyer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement
jointly as “Parties” or individually as “Party.” In consideration of the mutual promises and
obligations stated in this Agreement and its appendices, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE ONE. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED
This Agreement includes the following appendices, which are specifically incorporated
herein and made a part of this Agreement:
Appendix A Definitions
Appendix B Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter
Appendix C Forecasting Requirements
Appendix D Description of the Facility
Appendix E Seller’s Milestone Schedule
Appendix F Notices List
Appendix G Form of Letter of Credit
Appendix H Form of Consent to Assignment
This Agreement specifically incorporates herein by reference as if appended hereto the
following documents (collectively referred to herein as the “Referenced Documents”):
Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA Application, submitted by Seller, dated
__________
Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA Generation Forecast, dated _____________
Project Phasing Plan, approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on _____________
To the extent any provisions of the Referenced Documents conflict with any other
provisions of the Agreement, the other provisions of the Agreement shall control.
ARTICLE TWO. SELLER’S FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE
This Agreement governs Buyer’s purchase of the Product from the electrical generating
facility (hereinafter referred to as the “Facility” or “Project”) as described in this Section.
1.1. Facility Location. The Facility is physically located at:
Page 776
D-4-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
_____________________________.
1.2. Facility Name. The Facility is named _____________.
1.2.1. The Facility’s renewable resource is _______.
1.3. Interconnection Point. The Facility is connected to the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility (RCMU’s) electric system at __________ distribution circuit
at a service voltage of __12____ kV.
1.4. Delivery Point. The Delivery Point for Energy is the Interconnection Point.
1.5. Facility Description. A description of the Facility, including a summary of its
significant components, a drawing showing the general arrangements of the
Facility, and a single line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the
Facility and loads with the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s electric
distribution system, is attached and incorporated herein as Appendix D.
1.6. Commercial Operation.
1.6.1. The Facility’s expected Commercial Operation Date is _______.
1.6.2. Seller shall achieve Commercial Operation no later than the expected
Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1, which date shall be
no later than _______ (__) months from the Execution Date of this
Agreement. The expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section
2.6.1 may be extended for only the following reasons:
1.6.2.1. If Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including
but not limited to Seller’s timely filing of all required applications and
documents, payment of all applicable fees, and completion of all
electric system upgrades needed, if any) to have the Project physically
interconnected to the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s distribution
system, but fails to secure any necessary commitments from the
Transmission/Distribution Owner for such interconnection and
upgrades due to delays beyond Seller’s reasonable control, then the
expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 shall
be extended for the number of days necessary to physically
interconnect the Facility; provided, however, that such delay may not
extend the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section
2.6.1 for a period of more than six (6) months; or
1.6.2.2. If Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including
but not limited to Seller’s timely filing of all required applications and
documents and payment of all applicable fees, if any) to obtain
permits necessary to construct and operate the facility but fails to
secure any such permits due to delays beyond Seller’s reasonable
control, then the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in
Page 777
D-5-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Section 2.6.1 shall be extended for the number of days necessary to
secure such permits; provided, however, that such delay may not
extend the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section
2.6.1 for a period of more than six (6) months; or
1.6.2.3. In the event of Force Majeure, the expected Commercial Operation
Date specified in Section 2.6.1 shall be extended on a day-to-day
basis for a cumulative period of not more than six (6) months;
provided that Seller complies with Section 10.
1.6.2.4. Extensions under Section 2.6.2.1, 2.6.2.2, and 2.6.2.3, to the extent
they may occur concurrently, shall run concurrently.
1.6.3. Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer of the Commercial Operation Date of
the Facility at least thirty (30) days prior to such date.
1.6.4. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement, if Seller is unable to achieve
Commercial Operation by the expected Commercial Operation Date
specified in Section 2.6.1, which may be extended pursuant to Section 2.6.2,
then Seller shall either (i) terminate the Agreement, in which case Buyer
may retain the full Reservation Deposit, or (ii) pay to Buyer daily delay
damages in the amount of twenty cents ($0.20) for each kilowatt of Contract
Capacity for each day beyond the expected Commercial Operation Date
specified in Section 2.6.1, as may be extended pursuant to Section 2.6.2, that
Seller requires to achieve Commercial Operation.
1.6.5. Commercial Operation shall occur only when all of the following conditions
have been satisfied:
1.6.5.1. the Facility’s status as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource is
demonstrated by Seller’s receipt of pre-certification from the CEC;
1.6.5.2. the Parties have executed and exchanged the “Commercial
Operation Date Confirmation Letter” attached as Appendix B;
1.6.5.3. Seller is in compliance with all applicable requirements of the
RCMU Electric Service Rule 22 – Generating Facility
Interconnections;
1.6.5.4. Seller has furnished to Buyer all insurance documents required
under Section 9;
1.6.5.5. Seller has provided thirty (30) days’ Notice prior to the
Commercial Operation Date as required under Section 2.6.3;
1.6.5.6. Seller has obtained all permits necessary to operate the Facility and
is in compliance with all Laws applicable to the operation of the
Facility;
Page 778
D-6-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.6.5.7. Seller has successfully installed and tested the Facility at its full
Contract Capacity, and the Facility is capable of reliably generating at
its full Contract Capacity; and
1.6.5.8. Seller has satisfied the Collateral Requirement set forth in Section
3.9.
1.6.5.9. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has approved the Phasing Plan
submitted by Seller for the Facility.
ARTICLE THREE. CONTRACT CAPACITY AND QUANTITY; TERM; CONTRACT
PRICE; BILLING; COLLATERAL REQUIREMENT
1.7. Contract Capacity. Pursuant to the Phasing Plan approved by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, the Contract Capacity is as follows:
Phase 1: _____ kW, alternating current (AC).
Phase 2: _____ kW, alternating current (AC).
Phase 3: _____ kW, alternating current (AC).
1.8. Contract Quantity.
1.8.1. The “Contract Quantity” during each Contract Year is the amount set forth
in the applicable Contract Year in the “Delivery Term Contract Quantity
Schedule,” set forth in Appendix F , which amount is net of Station Use.
Seller shall have the option to update the Delivery Term Contract Quantity
Schedule one (1) time prior to Commercial Operation Date by an amount not
to exceed a five percent (5%) increase or decrease from the Contract
Quantity specified as of the Execution Date.
1.8.2. At least ninety (90) days prior to the occurrence of a Phasing Plan Transition
Event, Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer that includes the following
information (i) the new Contract Capacity consistent with Section 3.1; (ii)
the date upon which the changed Contract Capacity will be available to
Buyer; and (iii) documentation reasonably satisfactory to Buyer
demonstrating that the requirements of the Phasing Plan have been met.
1.8.3. Within thirty (30) days of receiving Notice from Seller pursuant to Section
3.2.2., the City Manager shall cause the Contract Quantity values specified
in Appendix F to be modified for the applicable Contract Years consistent
with the Phasing Plan, and such modification shall be considered an element
of the administration of this Agreement and shall not require the consent of
the Parties hereto. Upon such modification, the City Manager shall
promptly provide a copy of such revised Appendix F to Seller.
Page 779
D-7-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.9. Transaction. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall sell and deliver, or cause to be
delivered, and Buyer shall purchase and receive, all Product produced by or
associated with the Facility that is delivered to the Delivery Point. In no event shall
Seller have the right to procure the Product from sources other than the Facility for
sale or delivery to Buyer under this Agreement. Buyer shall have no obligation to
receive or purchase the Product from Seller prior to the Commercial Operation Date
or after the end of the Delivery Term.
1.10. Term of Agreement; Survival of Rights and Obligations.
1.10.1. The term shall commence upon the Execution Date of this Agreement and
shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the Delivery Term unless
terminated sooner pursuant to Sections 10.4 or 11 of this Agreement (the
“Term”).
1.10.2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all of the
rights and obligations that this Agreement expressly provides survive
termination as well as the rights and obligations that arise from Seller’s or
Buyer’s covenants, agreements, representations, and warranties applicable
to, or to be performed, at or during any time before or as a result of the
termination of this Agreement.
1.11. Delivery Term. Seller shall deliver the Product from the Facility to Buyer for a
period of twenty-five (25) Contract Years for all generation technologies. The
Delivery Term shall commence on the Commercial Operation Date and
continue until the end of the last Contract Year unless the Agreement is
terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.
1.12. Contract Price.
1.12.1. Throughout the Delivery Term, and subject to and in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement, Buyer shall pay the Contract Price to Seller for the
Product based on the amount of Delivered Energy. The Contract Price shall
be $__ per MWh of Delivered Energy.
1.12.2. In any Contract Year, if the amount of Delivered Energy exceeds one
hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the annual Contract Quantity amount, the
Contract Price for such Delivered Energy in excess of one hundred fifteen
percent (115%) shall be adjusted to be seventy-five percent (75%) of the
applicable Contract Price.
1.12.3. Seller shall curtail production of the Facility in accordance with the
applicable Notice after receipt of: (a) Notice from Buyer that Buyer has been
instructed by the CAISO or the Transmission/Distribution Owner or any
other jurisdictional entity to curtail Energy deliveries; or (b) Notice that
Seller has been given a curtailment order or similar instruction in order to
respond to an Emergency; or (c) Notice of a Curtailment Order issued by
Buyer. Buyer shall have no obligation to pay Seller for any Product
Page 780
D-8-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
delivered in violation of this Section 3.6.3. Seller shall assume all liability
and reimburse Buyer for any and all costs and charges incurred by Buyer,
including but not limited to CAISO penalties, as a result of Seller delivering
Energy in violation of the Section 3.6.3. Buyer shall have no obligation to
pay Seller for any Product that Seller would have been able to deliver but for
the fact of a curtailment pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) of the first sentence
of this Section 3.6.3.
1.12.4. Buyer shall have the right, but not the obligation, to issue to Seller a
Curtailment Order. Buyer shall pay Seller the Contract Price for the Product
Seller would have been able to deliver but for the fact that Buyer issued a
Curtailment Order (“Paid Curtailed Product”) as calculated pursuant to
Section 3.6.5.
1.12.5. No later than fifteen (15) days after the end of a calendar month in which
Buyer issued a Curtailment Order, Seller shall prepare and provide to Buyer
a calculation of the amount of Product the Facility would have been able to
deliver under Sections 3.6.4 for the applicable month. Seller shall apply
accepted industry standards in making such calculation and take into
consideration past performance of the Facility, and other relevant
information, including but not limited to, Facility availability, weather, water
flow, and solar irradiance data for the period of time during the Buyer issued
Curtailment Order. Upon Buyer’s request, Seller shall promptly provide to
Buyer any additional and supporting documentation necessary for Buyer to
audit and verify Seller’s calculation.
1.13. Billing.
1.13.1. The amount of Delivered Energy shall be determined by the meter
specified in Section 6.2.1 or Check Meter, as applicable. Buyer has no
obligation to purchase from Seller any Energy that is not or cannot be
delivered to the Delivery Point, regardless of circumstance. Buyer will not
be obligated to pay Seller for any Product that Seller delivers in violation of
Section 3.6.3, including any Product Seller delivers in excess of the amount
specified in any Curtailment Order.
1.13.2. For the purpose of calculating monthly payments under this Agreement,
the amount recorded by the meter specified in Section 6.2.1 or Check Meter,
as applicable, will be multiplied by the Contract Price noted in Section 3.6.1,
as possibly adjusted under Section 3.6.2, less any Energy produced by the
Facility for which Buyer is not obligated to pay Seller as set forth in Section
3.7.1.
1.13.3. On or before the last Business Day of the month immediately following
each calendar month, Seller shall determine the amount of Delivered Energy
received by Buyer pursuant to this Agreement for each monthly period and
issue an invoice showing the calculation of the payment. Seller shall also
Page 781
D-9-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
provide to Buyer: (a) records of metered data sufficient to document and
verify the generation of Delivered Energy by the Facility during the
preceding month; (b) access to any records; and (c) an invoice, in the format
specified by Buyer.
1.13.4. In the event an invoice or portion thereof or any other claim or adjustment
arising hereunder, is disputed, payment of the undisputed portion of the
invoice shall be required to be made when due, with Notice of the objection
given to the other Party. Any invoice dispute or invoice adjustment shall be
in writing and shall state the basis for the dispute or adjustment. Payment of
the disputed amount shall not be required until the dispute is resolved. In the
event adjustments to payments are required as a result of inaccurate meter(s),
Buyer in its reasonable discretion shall determine the correct amount of
Delivered Energy received under this Agreement during any period of
inaccuracy and recompute the amount due from Buyer to Seller for the
Delivered Energy delivered during the period of inaccuracy. The Parties
agree to use good faith efforts to resolve the dispute or identify the
adjustment as soon as possible. Upon resolution of the dispute or calculation
of the adjustment, any required payment shall be made within thirty (30)
days of such resolution.
1.13.5. All interest paid or payable under this Agreement shall be computed as
simple interest using the Interest Rate and, unless specified otherwise in this
Agreement, shall be paid concurrently with the payment or refund of the
underlying amount on which such interest is payable.
1.14. Title and Risk of Loss. Title to and risk of loss related to the Energy from the
Facility shall transfer from Seller to Buyer at the Delivery Point. Seller
warrants that it will deliver to Buyer the Product from the Facility free and
clear of all liens, security interests, claims, and encumbrances or any interest
therein or thereto by any person.
1.15. Collateral Requirement. On or before the Commercial Operation Date, Seller
shall post and thereafter maintain a collateral requirement equal to sixty dollars
($60.00) for each kilowatt of Contract Capacity (the “Collateral
Requirement”). The Collateral Requirement will be held by Buyer and must be
in the form of either cash deposit or Letter of Credit. The Collateral
Requirement shall be posted to Buyer and maintained at all times during the
Delivery Term. Buyer shall be entitled to draw upon the Collateral
Requirement for any damages arising upon Buyer’s declaration of an Early
Termination Date as set forth in Section 12.3. In the event that Buyer draws on
the Collateral Requirement, Seller shall promptly replenish such Collateral
Requirement to the amount specified in this Section 3.9. Buyer shall return the
unused portion of the Collateral Requirement to Seller promptly at the end of
the Delivery Term, once all payment obligations of the Seller under this
Agreement have been satisfied. Buyer shall pay simple interest on cash held to
Page 782
D-10-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
satisfy the Collateral Requirements at the rate and in the manner set forth in
Section 3.7.5.
ARTICLE FOUR. GREEN ATTRIBUTES; RESOURCE ADEQUACY BENEFITS;
ERR REQUIREMENTS
1.16. Green Attributes. Seller hereby provides and conveys all green attributes
associated with all electricity generation from the project to buyer as part of the
product being delivered. seller represents and warrants that seller holds the
rights to all green attributes from the project, and seller agrees to convey and
hereby conveys all such green attributes to buyer as included in the delivery of
the product from the project.
1.17. Conveyance of Product. Throughout the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide
and convey the Product to Buyer in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement, and Buyer shall have the exclusive right to the Product. Seller
shall, at its own cost, take all actions and execute all documents or instruments
that are reasonable and necessary to effectuate the use of the Green Attributes,
Resource Adequacy Benefits, if any, and Capacity Attributes, if any, for
Buyer’s benefit throughout the Delivery Term.
1.18. WREGIS. Seller shall cause and allow Buyer, or Buyer’s agent, to be the
“Qualified Reporting Entity” and “Account Holder” (as such terms are defined
by WREGIS) for the Facility within thirty (30) days after the Commercial
Operation Date. In the event that Buyer is not the Qualified Reporting Entity,
Seller shall, at its sole expense, take all actions necessary and provide any
documentation requested by Buyer in support of WREGIS account
administration and compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio
Standard. Seller, at its sole expense, shall take all necessary steps and
submit/file all necessary documentation to ensure that the Facility remains an
Eligible Renewable Energy Resource throughout the Delivery Term as
outlined in Section 4.5 and that all WREGIS Certificates associated with the
Product accrue to Buyer and will satisfy the requirements of the California
Renewables Portfolio Standard.
1.19. Resource Adequacy Benefits.
1.19.1. During the Delivery Term, Seller grants, pledges, assigns and otherwise
commits to Buyer all of the Contract Capacity, including Capacity
Attributes, if any, from the Project to enable Buyer to meet its Resource
Adequacy or successor program requirements, as the CAISO or other
regional entity may prescribe (“Resource Adequacy Requirements”).
1.19.2. Seller shall cooperate in good faith with and comply with reasonable
requests of Buyer to enable Buyer to maximize anyResource Adequacy
Benefits attributable to the Facility or any credits that reduce the Resource
Adequacy Requirements of the Buyer.
Page 783
D-11-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.20. Eligible Renewable Energy Resource. Seller shall take all actions necessary to
achieve and maintain status as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource
(“ERR”) throughout the Delivery Term. Within thirty (30) days after the
Commercial Operation Date, Seller shall file an application or other
appropriate request with the CEC for CEC Certification for the Facility. Seller
shall expeditiously seek CEC Certification, including promptly responding to
any requests for information from the requesting authority.
ARTICLE FIVE. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES; COVENANTS
1.21. Representations and Warranties. On the Execution Date, each Party represents
and warrants to the other Party that:
1.21.1. it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws
of the jurisdiction of its formation;
1.21.2. the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement are within its
powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action and do not violate
any of the terms and conditions in its governing documents, any contracts to
which it is a party or any Laws;
1.21.3. this Agreement and each other document executed and delivered in
accordance with this Agreement constitutes a legally valid and binding
obligation enforceable against it in accordance with its terms;
1.21.4. it is not Bankrupt and there are no proceedings pending or being
contemplated by it or, to its knowledge, threatened against it which would
result in it being or becoming Bankrupt; and
1.21.5. there is not pending or, to its knowledge, threatened against it or any of its
Affiliates any legal proceedings that could materially adversely affect its
ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
1.22. General Covenants. Each Party covenants that throughout the Term of this
Agreement:
1.22.1. it shall continue to be duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its formation;
1.22.2. it shall maintain (or obtain from time to time as required, including
through renewal, as applicable) all regulatory authorizations necessary for it
to legally perform its obligations under this Agreement; and
1.22.3. it shall perform its obligations under this Agreement in a manner that does
not violate any of the terms and conditions in its governing documents, any
contracts to which it is a party, or any Law.
Page 784
D-12-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.23. Seller’s Representations, Warranties and Covenants. In addition to the
representations, warranties and covenants specified in Sections 5.1 and 5.2,
Seller makes the following additional representations, warranties and
covenants to Buyer, as of the Execution Date:
1.23.1. Seller has met all applicable legal and regulatory requirements to sell
wholesale electricity in California;
1.23.2. Seller, and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that
throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement that: (i) the Project
qualifies and is certified by the CEC as an ERR as such term is defined in
Public Utilities Code Section 399.12 or Section 399.16; and (ii) the Project’s
output delivered to Buyer qualifies under the requirements of the California
Renewables Portfolio Standard. To the extent a change in law occurs after
execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to
be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller
has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in
law;
1.23.3. Seller and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that
throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement the Renewable Energy
Credits transferred to Buyer conform to the definition and attributes required
for compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard, as set
forth in the California Energy Commission’s Enforcement Procedures for
the Renewables Portfolio Standard for Local Publicly Owned Electric
Utilities adopted on December 22, 2020, and as may be modified by
subsequent decision of the California Energy Commission or by subsequent
legislation. To the extent a change in law occurs after execution of this
Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false
or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used
commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in law;
1.23.4. Throughout the Delivery Term, Seller shall: (a) own and operate the
Facility; (b) deliver the Product to Buyer free and clear of all liens, security
interests, claims, and encumbrances or any interest therein or thereto by any
individual or entity; and (c) hold the rights to all of the Product;
1.23.5. Seller is acting for its own account, has made its own independent
decision to enter into this Agreement and as to whether this Agreement is
appropriate or proper for it based upon its own judgment, is not relying upon
the advice or recommendations of the Buyer in so doing, and is capable of
assessing the merits of, and understands and accepts, the terms, conditions
and risks of this Agreement;
1.23.6. Throughout the Delivery Term: (a) Seller shall not convey, transfer,
allocate, designate, award, report or otherwise provide any or all of the
Product, or any portion thereof, or any benefits derived therefrom, to any
Page 785
D-13-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
party other than Buyer; and (b) Seller shall not start-up or operate the
Facility per instruction of or for the benefit of any third party, except as
required by other Laws;
1.23.7. The construction of the Facility shall comply with all Laws, including
applicable state and local laws, building standards, and interconnection
requirements;
1.23.8. No other person or entity, including any other generating facility, has any
rights in connection with Seller’s Interconnection Agreement or Seller’s
Interconnection Facilities and no other persons or entities shall have any
such rights during the Term;
1.23.9. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall not allow any other person or
entity, including any other generating facility, to use Seller’s Interconnection
Facilities; and
1.23.10. All representations made by Seller in its Industrial Zoning District
Renewable PPA Application are true and correct.
1.23.11. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of
(Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development
Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, the Contract Capacity, during the applicable phase, is
sufficient to meet the annualized customer load.
ARTICLE SIX. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1.24. Interconnection Requirements. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall comply
with all contractual, metering, and applicable interconnection requirements,
including those set forth in the RCMU Electric Service Rule 22,,
Transmission/Distribution Owner’s applicable tariffs, the CAISO Tariff and
implementing CAISO standards and requirements, and all Laws so as to be
able to deliver Energy to the Delivery Point. Seller shall provide and maintain
during the Delivery Term, at its cost, all data processing gateways or remote
intelligence gateways, telemetering equipment and data acquisition services,
and associated measuring and recording equipment necessary to meet all
applicable WREGIS and RCMU requirements applicable to the Facility during
the Delivery Term.
1.25. Metering Requirements.
1.25.1. All Energy from the Project must be delivered through a single revenue
quality meter and that meter must be dedicated exclusively to the Project.
All Delivered Energy purchased under this Agreement must be measured by
the Project’s revenue quality meter(s) to be eligible for payment under this
Agreement. Seller shall bear all costs relating to all metering equipment
installed to accommodate the Project.
Page 786
D-14-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.25.2. Buyer may, at its sole cost, furnish and install one Check Meter at the
interconnection associated with the Facility at a location provided by Seller
that is compliant with Buyer’s electric service requirements. The Check
Meter may be interconnected with Buyer’s communication network, or the
communication network of Buyer’s Agent, to permit periodic, remote
collection of revenue quality meter data. In the event that Buyer elects to
install a Check Meter, Buyer may compare the Check Meter data to the
Facility’s revenue meter data. If the deviation between the Facility’s
revenue meter data and the Check Meter data for any comparison is greater
than 0.3%, Buyer may provide Notice to Seller of such deviation and the
Parties shall mutually arrange for a meter check or recertification of the
Check Meter or the Facility’s revenue meter, as applicable. Each Party shall
bear its own costs for any meter check or recertification. Testing procedures
and standards for the Check Meter shall be the same as for a comparable
Buyer-owned meter. Parties shall have the right to have representatives
present during all such tests. The Check Meter, if Buyer elects to install a
Check Meter, is intended to be used for back-up purposes in the event of a
failure or other malfunction of the Facility’s revenue meter, and Check
Meter data shall only be used to validate the Facility’s revenue meter data
and, in the event of a failure or other malfunction of the Facility’s revenue
meter, in place of the Facility’s revenue meter until such time that the
Facility’s revenue meter is recertified.
1.26. Meter Data. Seller hereby agrees to provide all meter data to Buyer in a form
acceptable to Buyer, including any inspection, testing and calibration data and
reports. Seller shall grant Buyer and Buyer’s agent the right to retrieve the
meter readings from Seller or Seller’s meter reading agent.
1.27. Standard of Care. Seller shall: (a) maintain and operate the Facility and
Interconnection Facilities in conformance with RCMU Rule 22, all Laws, and
Prudent Electrical Practices; (b) obtain any governmental authorizations and
permits required for the construction and operation of the Facility and
Interconnection Facilities; and (c) generate, schedule and perform transmission
services in compliance with all applicable RCMU rulesand Prudent Electrical
Practices. Seller shall reimburse Buyer for any and all losses, damages,
claims, penalties, or liability Buyer incurs as a result of Seller’s failure to
obtain or maintain any governmental authorizations and permits required for
construction and operation of the Facility throughout the Term of this
Agreement.
1.28. Access Rights.
1.28.1. Operations Logs. Seller shall maintain a complete and accurate log of all
material operations and maintenance information on a daily basis. Such log
shall include, but not be limited to, information on power production, fuel
consumption (if applicable), efficiency, availability, maintenance performed,
outages, results of inspections, manufacturer recommended services,
Page 787
D-15-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
replacements, electrical characteristics of the generators, control settings or
adjustments of equipment and protective devices. Seller shall provide this
information electronically to Buyer within twenty (20) days of Buyer’s
request.
1.28.2. Access Rights. Buyer, its authorized agents, employees and inspectors
may, on reasonable advance notice under the circumstances, visit the Project
during normal business hours for purposes reasonably connected with this
Agreement. Buyer, its authorized agents, employees and inspectors must (a)
at all times adhere to all safety and security procedures as may be required
by Seller; and (b) not interfere with the operation of the Project. Buyer shall
make reasonable efforts to coordinate its emergency activities with the safety
and security departments, if any, of the Project operator. Seller shall keep
Buyer advised of current procedures for contacting the Project operator’s
safety and security departments, if any exist.
1.29. Protection of Property. Seller shall be solely responsible for protecting its own
facilities from possible damage resulting from electrical disturbances or faults
caused by the operation, faulty operation, or non-operation of the
Transmission/Distribution Owner's facilities. Buyer shall not be liable for any
such damages so caused.
1.30. Forecasting. Seller shall comply with the forecasting in Appendix C.
1.31. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Seller acknowledges that a Governmental
Authority may require Buyer to take certain actions with respect to greenhouse
gas emissions attributable to the generation of Energy, including, but not
limited to, reporting, registering, tracking, allocating for or accounting for such
emissions. Promptly following Buyer’s written request, Seller agrees to take
all commercially reasonable actions and execute or provide any and all
documents, information, or instruments with respect to generation by the
Facility reasonably necessary to permit Buyer to comply with such
requirements, if any.
1.32. Reporting and Record Retention.
1.32.1. Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to meet the Milestone
Schedule set forth in Appendix E and avoid or minimize any delays in
meeting such schedule. Seller shall provide Project development status
reports in a format and a frequency, which shall not exceed one (1) report
per month, specified by the Buyer. The report shall describe Seller’s
progress relative to the development, construction, and startup of the
Facility, as well as a Notice of any anticipated change to the Commercial
Operation Date and whether Seller is on schedule to meet the Commercial
Operation Date.
Page 788
D-16-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.32.2. Seller shall within ten (10) Business Days of receipt thereof provide to
Buyer copies of any Interconnection Agreement and all other material
reports, studies and analyses furnished by any Transmission/Distribution
Owner, and any correspondence with the Transmission/Distribution Owner
related thereto, concerning the interconnection of the Facility to the
Transmission/Distribution Owner’s electric system or the transmission of
Energy on the Transmission/Distribution Owners’ electric system.
1.32.3. Seller shall provide to Buyer on the Commercial Operation Date, and
within thirty (30) days after the completion of each Contract Year thereafter
during the Delivery Term, a copy of any inspection and maintenance report
regarding the Facility that was also provided to the
Transmission/Distribution Owner during the previous Contract Year.
1.33. Tax Withholding Documentation. Upon Buyer’s request, Seller shall promptly
provide to Buyer Internal Revenue Service tax Form W-9 and California tax
Form 590 (or their equivalent), completed with Seller’s information, and any
other documentation necessary for Buyer to comply with its tax reporting or
withholding obligations with respect to Seller.
1.34. Modifications to Facility. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall not repower
or materially modify or alter the Facility without the written consent of Buyer.
Material modifications or alterations include, but are not limited to, (a)
movement of the Site, (b) changes that may increase or decrease the expected
output of the Facility other than as allowed under Section 3.2, (c) changes that
may affect the generation profile of the Facility, (d) changes that may affect
the ability to accurately measure the output of Product from the Facility and (e)
changes that conflict with elections, information, or requirements specified
elsewhere in this Agreement. Material modifications or alterations do not
include maintenance and repairs performed in accordance with Prudent
Electrical Practices. Seller shall provide to Buyer Notice not less than ninety
(90) days before any proposed repowering, modification, or alteration occurs
describing the repowering, modification, or alteration to Buyer’s reasonable
satisfaction.
1.35. No Additional Incentives. Seller agrees that during the Term of this
Agreement it shall not seek additional compensation or other benefits pursuant
to the Self-Generation Incentive Program, as defined in CPUC Decision 01-03-
073, the California Solar Initiative, as defined in CPUC Decision 06-01-024,
Buyer’s net energy metering tariff, or other similar California ratepayer
subsidized program relating to energy production with respect to the Facility.
1.36. Site Control. Seller shall have Site Control as of the earlier of: (a) the
Commercial Operation Date; or (b) any date before the Commercial Operation
Date to the extent necessary for the Seller to perform its obligations under this
Agreement and, in each case, Seller shall maintain Site Control throughout the
Page 789
D-17-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Delivery Term. Seller shall promptly provide Buyer with Notice if there is any
change in the status of Seller’s Site Control.
ARTICLE SEVEN. INDEMNITY
1.37. Seller shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer and its directors,
officers, officials, and employees against and from any and all loss, liability,
damage, expense, and costs (including without limitation costs and fees of
litigation and reasonable attorneys’ fees) of every nature resulting from or
arising out of Seller’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or
its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement,
except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful
misconduct of Buyer.
1.38. Buyer shall not be responsible for any cost of decommissioning or demolition
of the Facility or any environmental or other liability associated with the
decommissioning or demolition of the Facility without regard to the timing or
cause of the decommissioning or demolition. Seller agrees to indemnify,
defend, and hold harmless, Buyer for any costs incurred by Buyer if and to the
extent that Seller’s actions or inactions causes any or all of them to become
required, whether statutorily or otherwise, to bear the cost of any
decommissioning or demolition of the Facility or any environmental or other
liability associated therewith, including, but not limited to, any investigations,
actions, suits, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, penalties, and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys’ fees) associated with clean-up costs and
defense costs. The indemnity requirements set forth in this Section shall
survive the termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE EIGHT. LIMITATION OF DAMAGES
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT THERE IS NO
WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE, AND ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED.
LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES ONLY, SUCH
DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY
AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES OR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE
WAIVED UNLESS EXPRESSLY HEREIN PROVIDED. NEITHER PARTY SHALL
BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR
INDIRECT DAMAGES, LOST PROFITS OR OTHER BUSINESS INTERRUPTION
DAMAGES, BY STATUTE, IN TORT OR CONTRACT, UNDER ANY INDEMNITY
PROVISION OR OTHERWISE. UNLESS EXPRESSLY HEREIN PROVIDED, AND
SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7 (INDEMNITY), IT IS THE INTENT
OF THE PARTIES THAT THE LIMITATIONS HEREIN IMPOSED ON REMEDIES
AND THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES BE WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CAUSE OR
CAUSES RELATED THERETO, INCLUDING THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY PARTY,
Page 790
D-18-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
WHETHER SUCH NEGLIGENCE BE SOLE, JOINT OR CONCURRENT, OR
ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ARTICLE NINE. INSURANCE
1.39. Insurance Coverage. Seller shall, at its own expense, starting on the Execution
Date and until the end of the Term, and for such additional periods as may be
specified below, provide and maintain in effect the following insurance
policies and minimum limits of coverage as specified below, and such
additional coverage as may be required by Law, with insurance companies
authorized to do business in the state in which the services are to be performed,
with an A.M. Best’s Insurance Rating of not less than A-:VII.
1.39.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial general liability
insurance, written on an occurrence, not claims-made basis, covering all
operations by or on behalf of Seller arising out of or connected with this
Agreement, including coverage for bodily injury, broad form property
damage, personal and advertising injury, products/completed operations,
contractual liability, premises-operations, owners and contractors protective,
hazard, explosion, collapse and underground. Such insurance must bear a
combined single limit per occurrence and annual aggregate of not less than
five million dollars ($5,000,000.00), exclusive of defense costs, for all
coverages. Such insurance must contain standard cross-liability and
severability of interest provisions. The Seller shall name the Buyer, its
officers, officials, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds on the
completed operations policy. The completed operations policy shall be as
broad as one of the following ISO forms CG 20 37, 2039, or CG 20 40.
Completed operations coverage must be maintained for a period of not less
than four (4) years after this Agreement terminates. If Seller elects, with
Buyer’s written concurrence, to use a “claims made” form of commercial
general liability insurance, then the following additional requirements apply:
(a) the retroactive date of the policy must be prior to the Execution Date; and
(b) either the coverage must be maintained for a period of not less than four
(4) years after this Agreement terminates, or the policy must provide for a
supplemental extended reporting period of not less than four (4) years after
this Agreement terminates. Governmental agencies which have an
established record of self-insurance may provide the required coverage
through self-insurance.
1.39.2. Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Workers’ compensation insurance
with statutory limits, as required by the state having jurisdiction over Seller’s
employees, and employer’s liability insurance with limits of not less than:
(a) bodily injury by accident - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) each
accident; (b) bodily injury by disease - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00)
policy limit; and (c) bodily injury by disease - one million dollars
($1,000,000.00) each employee.
Page 791
D-19-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.39.3. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial automobile
liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage with a
combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00)
per occurrence. Such insurance must cover liability arising out of Seller’s
use of all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles in the performance of
the Agreement.
1.39.4. Umbrella/excess liability Insurance. Umbrella/excess liability insurance,
written on an occurrence, not claims-made basis, providing coverage excess
of the underlying employer’s liability, commercial general liability, and
commercial automobile liability insurance, on terms at least as broad as the
underlying coverage, with limits of not less than four million dollars
($4,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the annual aggregate.
1.39.5. Pollution Liability Insurance. If the scope of work involves areas of
known pollutants or contaminants, pollution liability coverage will be
required to cover bodily injury, property damage, including clean-up costs
and defense costs resulting from sudden, and accidental conditions,
including the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot,
fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, hydrocarbons, liquids or gases, waste
materials or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants into or upon land, the
atmosphere or any water course or body of water shall be maintained. The
limit will not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence
or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate for bodily injury and property
damage. The policy will endorse RCMU as additional insured. If the
contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the
minimums shown above for all policies, the City requires and shall be
entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the
contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified
minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
1.40. Additional Insurance Provisions.
1.40.1. On or before the later of (a) sixty (60) days after the Execution Date and
(b) the date immediately preceding commencement of construction of the
Facility, and again within a reasonable time after coverage is renewed or
replaced, Seller shall furnish to Buyer certificates of insurance evidencing
the coverage required above, written on forms and with deductibles
reasonably acceptable to Buyer. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence,
Seller shall in no event furnish Buyer certificates of insurance evidencing
required coverage later than the Commercial Operation Date. All
deductibles, co-insurance and self-insured retentions applicable to the
insurance above must be paid by Seller. All certificates of insurance must
note that the insurers issuing coverage must endeavor to provide Buyer with
at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice in the event of cancellation of
coverage. Buyer’s receipt of certificates that do not comply with the
requirements stated in this Section 9.2.1, or Seller’s failure to provide such
Page 792
D-20-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
certificates, do not limit or relieve Seller of the duties and responsibility of
maintaining insurance in compliance with the requirements in this Section 9
and do not constitute a waiver of any of the requirements of Section 9.
1.40.2. Insurance coverage described above in Section 9.1 shall provide for thirty
(30) days written Notice to Buyer prior to cancellation, termination,
alteration, or material change of such insurance.
1.40.3. Evidence of coverage described above in Section 9.1 shall state that
coverage provided is primary and is not excess to or contributing with any
insurance or self-insurance maintained by Buyer.
1.40.4. Buyer shall have the right to inspect or obtain a copy of the original
policy(ies) of insurance.
1.40.5. All insurance certificates, endorsements, cancellations, terminations,
alterations, and material changes of such insurance must be issued, clearly
labeled with this Agreement’s identification number and submitted in
accordance with Section 10 and Appendix F.
1.40.6. The insurance requirements set forth in Section 9.1 shall apply as primary
insurance to, without a right of contribution from, any other insurance
maintained by or afforded to Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their
respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, and employees,
regardless of any conflicting provision in Seller's policies to the contrary.
To the extent permitted by Law, Seller and its insurers shall be required to
waive all rights of recovery from or subrogation against Buyer, its
subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors,
shareholders, agents, employees and insurers. The commercial general
liability insurance required in Section 9.1.1 and the umbrella/excess liability
insurance required in Section 9.1.4 must name Buyer, its subsidiaries and
Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents and
employees, as additional insureds for liability arising out of Seller’s
construction, use or ownership of the Facility. The Worker’s Compensation
policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Buyer
for all work performed by the Seller, its employees, agents and
subcontractors.
1.40.7. Seller shall remain liable for all acts, omissions or default of any
subcontractor or subsupplier and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Buyer for any and all loss or damages, as well as all costs, charges and
expenses which Buyer may suffer, incur, or bear as a result of any acts,
omissions or default by or on behalf of any subcontractor or subsupplier.
1.40.8. If Seller fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Section 9,
Seller, among other things and without restricting Buyer’s remedies under
Law or otherwise, shall, at its own cost, act as an insurer and provide
Page 793
D-21-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
insurance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Section 9.
With respect to the required commercial general liability insurance set forth
in Section 9.1.1, umbrella/excess liability insurance set forth in Section
9.1.4, commercial automobile liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.3,
and pollution liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.5 Seller shall provide
a current, full and complete defense to Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates,
and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees,
assigns, and successors in interest, in response to a third party claim in the
same manner that an insurer with an A.M. Best’s Insurance Rating of A-:VII
would have, had the insurance been maintained in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in this Section 9 and given the required additional
insured wording in the commercial general liability insurance and
umbrella/excess liability insurance, and standard “Who is an Insured”
provision in commercial automobile liability form.
ARTICLE TEN. NOTICES
Notices (other than forecasts and scheduling requests) shall, unless otherwise specified
herein, be in writing and may be delivered by hand delivery, United States mail, overnight
courier service, facsimile, or electronic messaging (e-mail). A notice sent by facsimile
transmission or e-mail will be recognized and shall be deemed received on the Business
Day on which such notice was transmitted if received before 5 p.m. Pacific prevailing
time (and if received after 5 p.m., on the next Business Day) and a notice by overnight
mail or courier shall be deemed to have been received on the next Business Day after such
Notice is sent or such earlier time as is confirmed by the receiving Party unless it confirms
a prior oral communication, in which case any such notice shall be deemed received on
the day sent. A Party may change its addresses by providing notice of same in accordance
with this provision. All Notices, requests, invoices, statements or payments for this
Facility must reference this Agreements identification number. Notices shall be provided
as indicated in Appendix F.
ARTICLE ELEVEN. FORCE MAJEURE
1.41. No Default for Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be in default in the
performance of any of its obligations set forth in this Agreement when and to
the extent failure of performance is caused by Force Majeure.
1.42. Requirements Applicable to Claiming Party. If a Party, because of Force
Majeure, is rendered wholly or partly unable to perform its obligations when
due under this Agreement, such Party (the “Claiming Party”) shall be excused
from whatever performance is affected by the Force Majeure to the extent so
affected. In order to be excused from its performance obligations under this
Agreement by reason of Force Majeure:
1.42.1. The Claiming Party, on or before the fourteenth (14th) day after the initial
occurrence of the claimed Force Majeure, must give the other Party Notice
describing the particulars of the occurrence; and
Page 794
D-22-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.42.2. The Claiming Party must provide timely evidence reasonably sufficient to
establish that the occurrence constitutes Force Majeure as defined in this
Agreement.
1.43. Limitations. The suspension of the Claiming Party’s performance due to Force
Majeure may not be greater in scope or longer in duration than is required by
such Force Majeure. In addition, the Claiming Party shall use diligent efforts
to remedy its inability to perform. When the Claiming Party is able to resume
performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the Claiming Party shall
give the other Party prompt Notice to that effect.
1.44. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement on at least five (5)
Business Days’ prior Notice, in the event of Force Majeure which materially
interferes with such Party’s ability to perform its obligations under this
Agreement and which (a) extends for more than 365 consecutive days, (b)
extends for more than a total of 365 days in any consecutive 540-day period, or
(c) is consistent with Section 2.6.2.3.
ARTICLE TWELVE. EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
1.45. Termination. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 11.4 or this Section
12, this Agreement automatically terminates immediately following the last
day of the Delivery Term.
1.46. Events of Default. An “Event of Default” means, with respect to a Party, the
occurrence of any of the following:
1.46.1. With respect to either Party:
1.46.1.1. A Party becomes Bankrupt;
1.46.1.2. Except for an obligation to make payment when due, if there is a
failure of a Party to perform any material covenant or obligation set
forth in this Agreement (except to the extent such failure provides a
separate termination right for the non-breaching Party or to the extent
excused by Force Majeure), if such failure is not remedied within
thirty (30) days after Notice thereof from the non-breaching Party to
the breaching Party;
1.46.1.3. A Party fails to make any payment due and owing under this
Agreement, if such failure is not cured within ten (10) Business Days
after Notice from the non-breaching Party to the breaching Party; or
1.46.1.4. Any representation or warranty made by a Party (a) is false or
misleading in any material respect when made or (b) becomes false or
misleading in any material respect during the Term.
1.46.2. With respect to Seller:
Page 795
D-23-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
1.46.2.1. Seller fails to take all corrective actions specified in any Buyer
Notice, within the time frame set forth in such Notice, that the Facility
is out of compliance with any term of this Agreement; provided that if
such corrective action falls under a specific termination right under
Section 12.2.2, then the time frame, if any, set forth for such right
shall apply;
1.46.2.2. The Facility has not achieved Commercial Operation by the
expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 and
Seller has not elected to pay daily delay damages pursuant to Section
2.6.4;
1.46.2.3. Subject to Section 11, Seller delivers less than eighty percent (80%)
of the applicable Contract Quantity from the Facility to Buyer for a
period of two (2) consecutive Contract Years;
1.46.2.4. Seller fails to maintain its status as an ERR as set forth in Section
4.5 of the Agreement;
1.46.2.5. Seller abandons the Facility;
1.46.2.6. Seller installs generating equipment at the Facility that exceeds the
Contract Capacity and such excess generating capacity is not removed
within five (5) Business Days after Notice from Buyer;
1.46.2.7. Seller delivers or attempts to deliver to the Delivery Point for sale
under this Agreement product that was not generated by the Facility;
1.46.2.8. Seller fails to install any of the equipment or devices necessary
for the Facility to satisfy the Contract Capacity set forth in Section
3.1;
1.46.2.9. An unauthorized assignment of the Agreement, as set forth in
Section 15;
1.46.2.10. Seller fails to reimburse Buyer any amounts due under this
Agreement;
1.46.2.11. Seller breaches the requirements in Section 6.12 regarding
incentives; or
1.46.2.12. Seller fails to maintain the Collateral Requirement set forth in
Section 3.9.
1.46.2.13. The annualized customer load associated with the Facility
pursuant to Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of (Alternative
Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development
Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho
Page 796
D-24-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Cucamonga Municipal Code is less than fifty percent (50%) of the
Contract Quantity, as measured over a Contract Year.
1.47. Declaration of an Event of Default. If an Event of Default has occurred, the
non-defaulting Party shall have the right to: (a) send Notice, designating a day,
no earlier than five (5) days after such Notice and no later than twenty (20)
days after such Notice, as an early termination date of this Agreement (“Early
Termination Date”); (b) accelerate all amounts owing between the Parties; (c)
terminate this Agreement and end the Delivery Term effective as of the Early
Termination Date; (d) collect any Settlement Amount under Section 12.5; and
(e) if the defaulting party is the Seller and Buyer terminates the Agreement
prior to the start of the Commercial Operation Date, Buyer shall have the right
to retain the entire Reservation Deposit.
1.48. Suspension of Performance. If an Event of Default shall have occurred, the
non-defaulting Party has the right to immediately suspend performance under
this Agreement and pursue all remedies available at Law or in equity against
the defaulting Party (including monetary damages), except to the extent that
such remedies are limited by the terms of this Agreement.
1.49. Calculation of Settlement Amount.
1.49.1. If either Party exercises a termination right under Section 12.3 after the
Commercial Operation Date, the non-defaulting Party shall calculate a
settlement amount (“Settlement Amount”) equal to the amount of the non-
defaulting Party’s aggregate Losses and Costs less any Gains, determined as
of the Early Termination Date. Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the
Settlement Amount shall be Zero dollars ($0).
1.49.2. If the non-defaulting Party’s aggregate Gains exceed its aggregate Losses
and Costs, if any, determined as of the Early Termination Date, the
Settlement Amount shall be Zero dollars ($0).
1.49.3. The Buyer shall not have to enter into replacement transactions to
establish a Settlement Amount.
1.49.4. Buyer shall have the right to draw upon the Collateral Requirement to
collect any Settlement Amount owed to Buyer.
1.50. Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties
pursuant to this Section 12 shall be cumulative and in addition to the rights of
the Parties otherwise provided in this Agreement.
1.51. Duty to Mitigate. Buyer and Seller shall each have a duty to mitigate damages
pursuant to this Agreement, and each shall use reasonable efforts to minimize
Page 797
D-25-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
any damages it may incur as a result of the other Party’s non-performance of
this Agreement, including with respect to termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE THIRTEEN. GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES
1.52. Governmental Charges. Seller shall pay or cause to be paid all taxes imposed
by any Governmental Authority (“Governmental Charges”) on or with respect
to the Product or the Transaction arising at the Delivery Point, including, but
not limited to, ad valorem taxes and other taxes attributable to the Project,
land, land rights or interests in land for the Project. Buyer shall pay or cause to
be paid all Governmental Charges on or with respect to the Product or the
Transaction from the Delivery Point. In the event Seller is required by Law or
regulation to remit or pay Governmental Charges which are Buyer’s
responsibility hereunder, Buyer shall reimburse Seller for such Governmental
Charges within thirty (30) days of Notice by Seller. If Buyer is required by
Law or regulation to remit or pay Governmental Charges which are Seller’s
responsibility hereunder, Buyer may deduct such amounts from payments to
Seller with respect to payments under the Agreement; if Buyer elects not to
deduct such amounts from Seller’s payments, Seller shall reimburse Buyer for
such amounts within thirty (30) days of Notice from Buyer. Nothing shall
obligate or cause a Party to pay or be liable to pay any Governmental Charges
for which it is exempt under the Law. A Party that is exempt at any time and
for any reason from one or more Governmental Charges bears the risk that
such exemption shall be lost or the benefit of such exemption reduced; and
thus, in the event a Party’s exemption is lost or reduced, each Party’s
responsibility with respect to such Governmental Charge shall be in
accordance with the first four sentences of this Section.
ARTICLE FOURTEEN. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND RECORDING
CONVERSATION
1.53. Release of Information. Seller authorizes Buyer to release to the FERC, CEC,
CAISO, CPUC, other Governmental Authority, and/or media outlet
information regarding the Facility, including the Seller’s name and location,
and the size, location and operational characteristics of the Facility, the Term,
the ERR type, photographs of the project, the Commercial Operation Date,
greenhouse gas emissions data, and the net power rating of the Facility, as
requested from time to time pursuant to the CEC’s, CPUC’s or applicable
Governmental Authority’s rules and regulations.
1.54. Public Announcements. Seller shall make no public announcement regarding
any aspect of this Agreement or the role of Seller in regards to the
development or operation of the Project without the prior written consent of
Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any public
announcement by Seller must comply with California Business and
Professions Code § 17580.5 and with the Guides for the Use of Environmental
Page 798
D-26-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Marketing Claims, published by the Federal Trade Commission, as it may be
updated from time to time.
ARTICLE FIFTEEN. ASSIGNMENT
1.55. General Assignment. Except as provided in Sections 15.2 and 15.3, Seller may
not assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the prior written
consent of the Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed so long as among other things (a) the assignee assumes the Seller’s
payment and performance obligations under this Agreement, (b) the assignee
agrees in writing to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof, (c) Seller
delivers evidence satisfactory to Buyer of the proposed assignee’s technical
and financial capability to meet or exceed Seller’s obligations hereunder and
(d) the Seller delivers such tax and enforceability assurance as Buyer may
reasonably request.
1.56. Assignment to Financing Providers. Seller may assign this Agreement as
collateral for any financing or refinancing of the Project (including any tax
equity or lease financing) with the prior written consent of the Buyer, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Parties agree that,
the consent provided to Buyer in accordance with this Section 15.2 shall be in
a form substantially similar to the Form of Financing Consent attached hereto
as Appendix H; provided that (a) Buyer shall not be required to consent to any
additional terms or conditions beyond those contained in Appendix H,
including extension of any cure periods or additional remedies for financing
providers, and (b) Seller shall be responsible at Buyer’s request for Buyer’s
reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees associated with the review, negotiation,
execution and delivery of documents in connection with such assignment.
1.57. Notice of Change in Control. Except in connection with public market
transactions of the equity interests or capital stock of Seller or Seller’s
Affiliates, Seller shall provide Buyer notice of any direct change of control of
Seller (whether voluntary or by operation of Law).
ARTICLE SIXTEEN. GOVERNING LAW
This agreement and the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and
construed, enforced, and performed in accordance with the laws of the State of California,
without regard to principles of conflicts of law. To the extent enforceable at such time, each
party waives its respective right to any jury trial with respect to any litigation arising under or in
connection with this agreement.
ARTICLE SEVENTEEN. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.58. Intent of the Parties. The sole procedure to resolve any claim arising out of or
relating to this Agreement is the dispute resolution procedure set forth in this
Section 17, except that either Party may seek an injunction in Superior Court in
San Bernardino County, California if such action is necessary to prevent
Page 799
D-27-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
irreparable harm, in which case both Parties nonetheless will continue to
pursue resolution of all other aspects of the dispute by means of this procedure.
1.59. Management Negotiations.
1.59.1. The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any controversy or claim
arising out of or relating to this Agreement by prompt negotiations between
each Party’s authorized representative, or such other person designated in
writing as a representative of the Party (each a “Manager”). Either Manager
may request a meeting, to be held in person or telephonically, to initiate
negotiations to be held within ten (10) Business Days of the other Party’s
receipt of such request, at a mutually agreed time and place.
1.59.2. All communication and writing exchanged between the Parties in
connection with these negotiations shall be deemed inadmissible as evidence
such that it cannot be used or referred to in any subsequent judicial or
arbitration process between the Parties, whether with respect to this dispute
or any other.
1.59.3. If the matter is not resolved within forty-five (45) days of commencement
of negotiations under Section 17.2.1, or if the Party receiving the written
request to meet refuses or does not meet within the ten (10) Business Day
period specified in Section 17.2.1, either Party may initiate arbitration of the
controversy or claim according to the terms of Section 17.3.
1.60. Arbitration Initiation. If the dispute cannot be resolved by negotiation as set
forth in Section 17.2 above, then the Parties shall resolve such controversy
through arbitration (“Arbitration”). The Arbitration shall be adjudicated by
one retired judge or justice from the JAMS panel. The Arbitration shall take
place in San Bernardino County, California, and shall be administered by and
in accordance with JAMS’ Commercial Arbitration Rules. If the Parties
cannot mutually agree on the arbitrator who will adjudicate the dispute, then
JAMS shall provide the Parties with an arbitrator pursuant to its then-
applicable Commercial Arbitration Rules. The arbitrator shall have no
affiliation with, financial or other interest in, or prior employment with either
Party and shall be knowledgeable in the field of the dispute. Either Party may
initiate Arbitration by filing with the JAMS a notice of intent to arbitrate at any
time following the unsuccessful conclusion of the management negotiations
provided for in Section 17.2.
ARTICLE EIGHTEEN. MISCELLANEOUS
1.61. Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is determined to be invalid,
void or unenforceable by any court having jurisdiction, such determination
shall not invalidate, void, or make unenforceable any other provision,
agreement or covenant of this Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement
Page 800
D-28-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
held invalid or unenforceable only in part or degree will remain in full force
and effect to the extent not held invalid or unenforceable.
1.62. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts
each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall be deemed
one and the same Agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this
Agreement by facsimile or PDF transmission will be deemed as effective as
delivery of an originally executed counterpart. Each Party delivering an
executed counterpart of this Agreement by facsimile or PDF transmission shall
also deliver an originally executed counterpart, but the failure of any Party to
deliver an originally executed counterpart of this Agreement shall not affect
the validity or effectiveness of this Agreement.
1.63. General. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be
enforceable unless reduced to writing and executed by both Parties. This
Agreement shall not impart any rights enforceable by any third party other than
a permitted successor or assignee bound to this Agreement. Waiver by a Party
of any default by the other Party shall not be construed as a waiver of any other
default. The term “including” when used in this Agreement shall be by way of
example only and shall not be considered in any way to be in limitation. The
headings used herein are for convenience and reference purposes only.
1.64. Interpretation. Whenever this Agreement specifically refers to any Law, tariff,
Governmental Authority, regional reliability council,
Transmission/Distribution Owner, or credit rating agency, the Parties hereby
agree that the references also refers to any successor to such Law, tariff or
organization.
1.65. Construction. The Agreement will not be construed against any Party as a
result of the preparation, substitution, or other event of negotiation, drafting or
execution thereof.
1.66. Forward Contract. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement
constitutes a “forward contract” within the meaning of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, and Buyer and Seller are “forward contract merchants” within the
meaning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Each Party further agrees that, for all
purposes of this Agreement, each Party waives and agrees not to assert the
applicability of the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 366 in any Bankruptcy
proceeding wherein such Party is a debtor. In any such proceeding, each Party
further waives the right to assert that the other Party is a provider of last resort
to the extent such term relates to 11 U.S.C. §366 or another provision of 11
U.S.C. § 101-1532.
1.67. Change in Electric Market Design. If a change in the CAISO Tariff renders
this Agreement or any provisions hereof incapable of being performed or
administered, then any Party may request that Buyer and Seller enter into
negotiations to make the minimum changes to this Agreement necessary to
Page 801
D-29-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
make this Agreement capable of being performed and administered, while
attempting to preserve to the maximum extent possible the benefits, burdens,
and obligations set forth in this Agreement as of the Execution Date. Upon
delivery of such a request, Buyer and Seller shall engage in such negotiations
in good faith. If Buyer and Seller are unable, within sixty (60) days after
delivery of such request, to agree upon changes to this Agreement or to resolve
issues relating to changes to this Agreement, then any Party may submit issues
pertaining to changes to this Agreement to the dispute resolution process set
forth in Article 17. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) a change in cost shall not
in and of itself be deemed to render this Agreement or any of the provisions
hereof incapable of being performed or administered, and (ii) all of the
unaffected provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
during any period of such negotiation or dispute resolution.
1.68. Further Assurances. Each of the Parties hereto agrees to provide such
information, execute and deliver any instruments and documents and to take
such other actions as may be necessary or reasonably requested by the other
Party which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement and
which do not involve the assumptions of obligations other than those provided
for in this Agreement, to give full effect to this Agreement and to carry out the
intent of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by
its authorized representative as of the date of last signature provided below.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
(Seller) (Buyer)
(Signature) (Signature)
(Type/Print Name) (Type/Print Name)
(Title) (Title)
(Date) (Date)
Page 802
D-30-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix A – Definitions
“Affiliate” means, with respect to a Party, any entity that, directly or indirectly, through
one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with that
Party.
“Arbitration" has the meaning set forth in Section 17.
“As-Available Facility” means a generating facility that is powered by one of the
following sources, except for a de minimis amount of Energy from other sources: (a) wind, (b)
solar energy, (c) hydroelectric potential derived from small conduit water distribution facilities
that do not have storage capability, or (d) other variable sources of energy that are contingent
upon natural forces other than geothermal.
“Available Capacity” means the rated alternating current (AC) generating capacity of the
Facility, expressed in whole kilowatts, that is available to generate Product.
“Bankrupt” means with respect to any entity, such entity:
(a) Files a petition or otherwise commences, authorizes or acquiesces in the
commencement of a proceeding or cause of action under any bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization or similar law, or has any such petition filed or commenced against it;
(b) Makes an assignment or any general arrangement for the benefit of creditors;
(c) Otherwise becomes bankrupt or insolvent (however evidenced);
(d) Has a liquidator, administrator, receiver, trustee, conservator or similar official
appointed with respect to such entity or any substantial portion of its property or assets; or
(e) Is generally unable to pay its debts as they fall due.
“Baseload Facility” means a generating facility that does not qualify as an As-Available
Facility.
“Business Day” means any day except a Saturday, Sunday, a Federal Reserve Bank
holiday, or the Friday following Thanksgiving during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. local
time for the relevant Party’s principal place of business where the relevant Party in each instance
shall be the Party from whom the notice, payment or delivery is being sent.
“CAISO” means the California Independent System Operator Corporation or any
successor entity performing similar functions.
“CAISO Grid” means the system of transmission lines and associated facilities that have
been placed under the CAISO’s operational control.
“CAISO Tariff” means the CAISO FERC Electric Tariff, Fifth Replacement Volume No.
1, as amended from time to time.
Page 803
D-31-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
“California Renewables Portfolio Standard” means the renewable energy program and
policies codified in California Public Utilities Code Sections 399.11 through 399.33 and
California Public Resources Code Sections 25740 through 25751, as such provisions may be
amended or supplemented from time to time.
“Capacity Attributes” means any current or future defined characteristic, certificate, tag,
credit, or ancillary service attribute, whether general in nature or specific as to the location or any
other attribute of the Project, intended to value any aspect of the capacity of the Project to
produce Energy or ancillary services, including, but not limited to, any accounting construct so
that the full Contract Capacity of the Project may be counted toward a Resource Adequacy
Requirement or any other measure by the CPUC, the CAISO, the FERC, or any other entity
invested with the authority under federal or state Law, to require Buyer to procure, or to procure
at Buyer’s expense, Resource Adequacy Benefits or other such products.
“CEC” means the California Energy Commission or its successor agency.
“CEC Certification” means certification by the CEC that the Facility is an ERR and that
all Energy produced by the Facility qualifies as generation from an ERR.
“CEC Pre-Certification” means provisional certification of the proposed Facility as an
ERR by the CEC upon submission by a facility of a complete application and required
supplemental information.
“Check Meter” means the Buyer revenue-quality meter section(s) or meter(s), which
Buyer may require at its discretion, and which will include those devices normally supplied by
Buyer or Seller under the applicable utility electric service requirements.
“City Manager” means the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
“Claiming Party” has the meaning set forth in Section 10.2.
“Commercial Operation” means the Contract Capacity has been installed and the Facility
is operating and able to produce and deliver the Product to Buyer pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement.
“Commercial Operation Date” means the date on which the Facility achieves
Commercial Operation.
“Contract Capacity” means the amount of electric energy generating capacity, set forth in
Section 3.1, that Seller commits to install at the Site.
“Contract Price” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.6.
“Contract Quantity” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“Contract Year” means a period of twelve (12) consecutive months with the first Contract
Year commencing on the Commercial Operation Date and each subsequent Contract Year
commencing on the anniversary of the Commercial Operation Date.
Page 804
D-32-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
“Costs” means (a) brokerage fees, commissions and other similar third-party transaction
costs and expenses reasonably incurred either in terminating any arrangement pursuant to which
it has hedged its obligations or in entering into new arrangements which replace the Transaction;
and (b) all reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with the termination of
the Transaction.
“CPUC” means the California Public Utilities Commission, or successor entity.
“Credit Rating” means, with respect to any entity, (a) the rating then assigned to such
entity’s unsecured senior long-term debt obligations (not supported by third party credit
enhancements), or (b) if such entity does not have a rating for its unsecured senior long-term
debt obligations, then the rating assigned to such entity as an issuer rating by S&P and/or
Moody’s. If the entity is rated by both S&P and Moody’s and such ratings are not equivalent,
the lower of the two ratings shall determine the Credit Rating. If the entity is rated by either
S&P or Moody’s, but not both, then the available rating shall determine the Credit Rating.
“Current Inverters” means devices used to convert DC electric energy to alternating
current electric energy.
“Curtailment Order” means any instruction from Buyer to Seller to reduce the delivery of
Energy from the Facility for any reason other than as set forth in Sections 3.6.3 (a) or (b).
“DC” means direct current.
“DC Collection System” means the DC equipment, cables, components, devices and
materials that interconnect the Photovoltaic Modules with the Current Inverters.
“Delivered Energy” means all Energy produced from the Facility and delivered by Seller
to the Delivery Point, expressed in kWh, as recorded by the meter specified in Section 6.2.1 or
the Check Meter, as applicable.
“Delivery Point” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5.
“Delivery Term” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5.
“Early Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.3.
“Eligible Renewable Energy Resource” or “ERR” has the meaning set forth in Public
Utilities Code Sections 399.12 or Section 399.16 and California Public Resources Code Section
25741, as these code provision may be amended or supplemented from time to time.
“Emergency” means (a) an actual or imminent condition or situation which jeopardizes
the integrity of the electric system or the integrity of any other systems to which the electric
system is connected or any condition so defined and declared by the CAISO; or (b) an
emergency condition as defined under an Interconnection Agreement and any abnormal
interconnection or system condition that requires automatic or immediate manual action to
prevent or limit loss of load or generation supply, that could adversely affect the reliability of the
Page 805
D-33-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
electric system or generation supply, that could adversely affect the reliability of any
interconnected system, or that could otherwise pose a threat to public safety.
“Energy” means three-phase, 60-cycle alternating current electric energy measured in
kWh, net of Station Use. For purposes of the definition of “Green Attributes,” the word
“energy” shall have the meaning set forth in this definition.
“Execution Date” means the latest signature date found at the end of the Agreement.
“Facility” has the meaning set forth in Section 2. The terms “Facility” or “Project” as
used in this Agreement are interchangeable.
“FERC” means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any successor government
agency.
“Force Majeure” means an event or circumstance which prevents one Party from
performing its obligations under the Agreement, which event or circumstance was not
anticipated as of the Execution Date, which is not within the reasonable control of, or the result
of the negligence of, the Claiming Party, and which, by the exercise of due diligence, the
Claiming Party is unable to overcome or avoid or cause to be avoided, including war, riot, civil
disturbance or disobedience, terrorism, sabotage, strike or labor dispute. Force Majeure does not
include: (a) the lack of wind, sun, or other fuel source of an inherently intermittent nature; (b)
reductions in generation from the Facility resulting from ordinary wear and tear, deferred
maintenance or operator error; or (c) any delay in providing, or cancellation of, interconnection
service by a Transmission/Distribution Owner or the CAISO, except to the extent such delay or
cancellation is the result of a Force Majeure claimed by the Transmission/Distribution Owner or
the CAISO. Force Majeure may include delays in performance or inability to perform or comply
with the terms and conditions of this Agreement due to delays in obtaining necessary equipment,
labor, or materials or other issues caused by or attributable to pandemics or epidemics, including
the disease designated COVID-19 or the related virus designated SARS-CoV-2 or any mutations
thereof (collectively, “COVID-19”), if the elements of Force Majeure defined in the first
sentence hereof (other than the requirement that the event or circumstance was not anticipated as
of the date the Agreement was agreed to) have been satisfied; provided, however, that the
general existence of COVID-19 shall not be sufficient to prove the existence of a Force Majeure
absent a showing of other facts and circumstances which in the aggregate establish that a Force
Majeure as defined in the first sentence hereof (other than the requirement that the event or
circumstance was not anticipated as of the date the Agreement was agreed to) has occurred.
“Gains” means with respect to any Party, an amount equal to the present value of the
economic benefit to it, if any (exclusive of Costs), resulting from the termination of the
Transaction, determined in a commercially reasonable manner, subject to Section 12.5. Factors
used in determining economic benefit may include, without limitation, reference to information
either available to it internally or supplied by one or more third parties, including, without
limitation, quotations (either firm or indicative) of relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves,
volatilities, spreads or other relevant market data in the relevant markets, market price referent,
market prices for a comparable transaction, forward price curves based on economic analysis of
the relevant markets, settlement prices for a comparable transaction at liquid trading platforms
Page 806
D-34-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
(e.g., NYMEX), all of which should be calculated for the remaining Delivery Term to determine
the value of the Product.
“Governmental Authority” means any federal, state, local or municipal government,
governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency, or instrumentality, or any
judicial, regulatory or administrative body, having jurisdiction as to the matter in question.
“Governmental Charges” has the meaning set forth in Section 13.1.
“Green Attributes” means any and all credits, benefits, emissions reductions, offsets, and
allowances, howsoever entitled, attributable to the generation from the Project, and its avoided
emission of pollutants. Green Attributes include but are not limited to Renewable Energy
Credits, as well as: (1) any avoided emission of pollutants to the air, soil or water such as sulfur
oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and other pollutants; (2) any
avoided emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons,
perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) that have been
determined by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or otherwise by
law, to contribute to the actual or potential threat of altering the Earth’s climate by trapping heat
in the atmosphere; (3) the reporting rights to these avoided emissions, such as Green Tag
Reporting Rights. Green Tag Reporting Rights are the right of a Green Tag Purchaser to report
the ownership of accumulated Green Tags in compliance with federal or state law, if applicable,
and to a federal or state agency or any other party at the Green Tag Purchaser’s discretion, and
include without limitation those Green Tag Reporting Rights accruing under Section 1605(b) of
The Energy Policy Act of 1992 and any present or future federal, state, or local law, regulation or
bill, and international or foreign emissions trading program. Green Tags are accumulated on a
MWh basis and one Green Tag represents the Green Attributes associated with one (1) MWh of
Energy. Green Attributes do not include (i) any energy, capacity, reliability or other power
attributes from the Project, (ii) production tax credits associated with the construction or
operation of the Project and other financial incentives in the form of credits, reductions, or
allowances associated with the project that are applicable to a state or federal income taxation
obligation, (iii) fuel-related subsidies or “tipping fees” that may be paid to Seller to accept
certain fuels, or local subsidies received by the generator for the destruction of particular
preexisting pollutants or the promotion of local environmental benefits, or (iv) emission
reduction credits encumbered or used by the Project for compliance with local, state, or federal
operating and/or air quality permits. If the Project is a biomass or biogas facility and Seller
receives any tradable Green Attributes based on the greenhouse gas reduction benefits or other
emission offsets attributed to its fuel usage, it shall provide Buyer with sufficient Green
Attributes to ensure that there are zero net emissions associated with the production of electricity
from the Project.
“Interconnection Agreement” means the small generator interconnection agreement
entered into separately between Seller, Transmission/Distribution Owner, and CAISO (as
appropriate) obtained by Seller pursuant to Transmission/Distribution Owner’s Wholesale
Distribution Tariff.
“Interconnection Facilities” has the meaning set forth in the tariff applicable to the
Seller’s Interconnection Agreement.
Page 807
D-35-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
“Interconnection Point” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3.
“Interest Rate” means the rate per annum equal to the “Monthly” Federal Funds Rate (as
reset on a monthly basis based on the latest month for which such rate is available) as reported in
Federal Reserve Bank Publication H.15-519, or its successor publication.
“JAMS” means JAMS, Inc. or its successor entity, a judicial arbitration and mediation
service.
“kW” means kilowatt.
“kWh” means kilowatt-hour.
“kWPDC” means peak DC power.
“Law” means any statute, law, treaty, rule, regulation, ordinance, code, permit,
enactment, injunction, order, writ, decision, authorization, judgment, decree or other legal or
regulatory determination or restriction by a court or Governmental Authority of competent
jurisdiction, including any of the foregoing that are enacted, amended, or issued after the
Execution Date, and which becomes effective during the Delivery Term; or any binding
interpretation of the foregoing.
“Letter of Credit” means an irrevocable, non-transferable standby letter of credit issued
either by a U.S. commercial bank or a foreign bank with a U.S. branch office with a Credit
Rating of at least “A-” by S&P and “A3” by Moody’s (without a “credit watch”, “negative
outlook” or other rating decline alert if its Credit Rating is “A-” by S&P or “A3” by Moody’s).
The Letter of Credit must be substantially in the form as contained in Appendix G to this
Agreement; provided that if the Letter of Credit is issued by a branch of a foreign bank, Buyer
may require changes to such form.
“Losses” means, with respect to any Party, an amount equal to the present value of the
economic loss to it, if any (exclusive of Costs), resulting from the termination of the Transaction,
determined in a commercially reasonable manner, subject to Section 12.5. Factors used in
determining the loss of economic benefit may include, without limitation, reference to
information either available to it internally or supplied by one or more third parties including,
without limitation, quotations (either firm or indicative) of relevant rates, prices, yields, yield
curves, volatilities, spreads or other relevant market data in the relevant markets, market price
referent, market prices for a comparable transaction, forward price curves based on economic
analysis of the relevant markets, settlement prices for a comparable transaction at liquid trading
platforms (e.g. NYMEX), all of which should be calculated for the remaining term of the
Transaction to determine the value of the Product.
“Manager” has the meaning set forth in Section 17.2.
“Mechanical Completion” means that all equipment and systems that are necessary to
generate the effective capacity of the Facility are installed. The Facility is mechanically,
electrically, and structurally constructed with all control systems installed and connected. The
Page 808
D-36-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Facility is functionally complete to the extent necessary to begin commissioning and testing of
the Facility, though commissioning and testing need not have commenced.”
“MW” means megawatt (AC).
“MWh” means megawatt-hour.
“Notice,” unless otherwise specified in the Agreement, means written communications by
a Party to be delivered by hand delivery, United States mail, overnight courier service, facsimile
or electronic messaging (e-mail).
“Party” means the Buyer or Seller individually, and “Parties” means both collectively.
For purposes of Section 16 (Governing Law) the word “party” or “parties” shall have the
meaning set forth in this definition.
“Phasing Plan” means the plan submitted by Seller to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
specifying the phases of the Project and the Contract Capacity associated with each Phase, and
further, consistent with the requirements of Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of (Alternative
Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17
(Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
“Phasing Plan Transition Event” means the occurrence of an event that transitions the
Facility from one Phase to a different Phase as specified in the Phasing Plan.
“Photovoltaic Module” means the individual module or component that produces DC
electric energy from sun light.
“Photovoltaic Module DC Rating” means, for each Photovoltaic Module installed or to
be installed at the Site, the number (expressed in kWPDC) stated on the nameplate affixed
thereto representing the manufacturer’s maximum (at “peak” sunlight) DC power rating at the
standard test condition (“Pmp” or Power maximum at peak).
“Product” means all Energy produced by the Facility throughout the Delivery Term, net
of Station Use and electrical losses from the Facility to the Delivery Point; all Green Attributes;
all Capacity Attributes, if any; and all Resource Adequacy Benefits, if any; generated by,
associated with or attributable to the Facility throughout the Delivery Term.
“Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 2. The terms “Facility” and “Project” as
used in this Agreement are interchangeable.
“Prudent Electrical Practices” means those practices, methods and acts that would be
implemented and followed by prudent operators of electric energy generating facilities in the
Western United States, similar to the Facility, during the relevant time period, which practices,
methods and acts, in the exercise of prudent and responsible professional judgment in the light of
the facts known at the time the decision was made, could reasonably have been expected to
accomplish the desired result consistent with good business practices, reliability and safety.
Prudent Electrical Practices shall include, at a minimum, those professionally responsible
practices, methods and acts described in the preceding sentence that comply with manufacturers’
Page 809
D-37-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
warranties, restrictions in this Agreement, and the requirements of Governmental Authorities,
WECC standards, the CAISO and Laws. Prudent Electrical Practices also includes taking
reasonable steps to ensure that:
(a) Equipment, materials, resources, and supplies, including spare parts inventories,
are available to meet the Facility’s needs;
(b) Sufficient operating personnel are available at all times and are adequately
experienced and trained and licensed as necessary to operate the Facility properly and efficiently,
and are capable of responding to reasonably foreseeable emergency conditions at the Facility and
Emergencies whether caused by events on or off the Site;
(c) Preventive, routine, and non-routine maintenance and repairs are performed on a
basis that ensures reliable, long term and safe operation of the Facility, and are performed by
knowledgeable, trained, and experienced personnel utilizing proper equipment and tools;
(d) Appropriate monitoring and testing are performed to ensure equipment is
functioning as designed;
(e) Equipment is not operated in a reckless manner, in violation of manufacturer’s
guidelines or in a manner unsafe to workers, the general public, or the Transmission/Distribution
Owner’s electric system or contrary to environmental laws, permits or regulations or without
regard to defined limitations such as, flood conditions, safety inspection requirements, operating
voltage, current, volt ampere reactive (VAR) loading, frequency, rotational speed, polarity,
synchronization, and control system limits; and
(f) Equipment and components are designed and manufactured to meet or exceed the
standard of durability that is generally used for electric energy generating facilities operating in
the Western United States and will function properly over the full range of ambient temperature
and weather conditions reasonably expected to occur at the Site and under both normal and
emergency conditions.
“Renewable Energy Credit” has the meaning set forth in Public Utilities Code Section
399.12(h), as may be amended from time to time or as further defined or supplemented by Law.
“Reservation Deposit” means the deposit submitted by Seller to Buyer at the time Seller
submitted its application for an Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA contract, which
amount shall equal four dollars ($4.00) for each kilowatt of proposed alternating current (AC)
generator capacity. Buyer shall return the Reservation Deposit to Seller once the Project achieves
Commercial Operation by crediting Seller the full amount of the Reservation Deposit on Buyer’s
first payment for delivered Product. Buyer shall retain the full amount of the Reservation Deposit
in the event the Project does not achieve Commercial Operation by the Commercial Operation
Date.
“Resource Adequacy Benefits” means the rights and privileges attached to the Facility
that satisfy any entity’s resource adequacy obligations, as those obligations are set forth in any
Page 810
D-38-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Resource Adequacy Rulings and shall include any local, zonal, or otherwise locational attributes
associated with the Facility.
“Resource Adequacy Requirements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.1.
“Resource Adequacy Rulings” means any other resource adequacy laws, rules or
regulations enacted, adopted or promulgated by any applicable Governmental Authority, as such
decisions, rulings, Laws, rules or regulations may be amended or modified from time-to-time
during the Delivery Term.
“Restricted Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.8.1.
“Settlement Amount” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.5.
“Site” means the real property on which the Facility is, or will be, located, as further
described in Appendix D.
“Site Control” means the Seller: (a) owns the Site, (b) leases the Site, (c) is the holder of
a right-of-way grant or similar instrument with respect to the Site, or (d) prior to the Commercial
Operation Date, has the unilaterally exercisable contractual right to acquire or cause to be
acquired on its behalf any of (a), (b), or (c).
“Station Use” means energy consumed within the Facility’s electric energy distribution
system as losses, as well as energy used to operate the Facility’s auxiliary equipment. The
auxiliary equipment may include, but is not limited to, forced and induced draft fans, cooling
towers, boiler feeds pumps, lubricating oil systems, plant lighting, fuel handling systems, control
systems, and sump pumps. This use is not to exceed 1% of average annual output.
“Term” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4.1.
“Transaction” means the particular transaction described in Section 3.3.
“Transmission/Distribution Owner” means any entity or entities responsible for operating
the electric distribution system or transmission system, as applicable, at and beyond the
Interconnection Point.
“WECC” means the Western Electricity Coordinating Council, the regional reliability
council for the Western United States, Northwestern Mexico and Southwestern Canada.
“WREGIS” means the Western Renewable Energy Generating Information System or
any successor renewable energy tracking program.
“WREGIS Certificates” has the same meaning as “Certificate” as defined by WREGIS in
the WREGIS Operating Rules and are designated as eligible for complying with the California
Renewables Portfolio Standard.
Page 811
D-39-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
“WREGIS Operating Rules” means those operating rules and requirements adopted by
WREGIS as of December 2010, as subsequently amended, supplemented or replaced (in whole
or in part) from time to time.
*** End of Appendix A ***
Page 812
D-40-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix B – Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter
In accordance with the terms of that certain Industrial Zoning District Renewable Power
Purchase Agreement dated ________(“Agreement”) for the Facility named
________________________ by and between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA “Buyer”)
and ____________________ (“Seller”), this letter serves to document the Parties further
agreement that (i) the conditions precedent to the occurrence of the Commercial Operation Date
have been satisfied as of this _____ day of _________, ______. This letter shall confirm the
Commercial Operation Date, as defined in the Agreement, as the date referenced in the preceding
sentence.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its
authorized representative as of the date of last signature provided below:
By: By:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
(Seller) (Buyer)
(Signature) (Signature)
(Type/Print Name) (Type/Print Name)
(Title) (Title)
(Date) (Date)
*** End of Appendix B ***
Page 813
D-41-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix C – Forecasting Requirements
A. AVAILABLE CAPACITY FORECASTING.
Seller shall provide the Available Capacity forecasts described below. [The following
bracketed language applies to As-Available solar or wind Projects only] [Seller’s availability
forecasts below shall include Project availability and updated status of [The following bracketed
language applies to solar Projects only] [photovoltaic panels, inverters, transformers, and any
other equipment that may impact availability] or [The following bracketed language applies to
wind Projects only] [transformers, wind turbine unit status, and any other equipment that may
impact availability].] [The following bracketed language applies to As-Available Product only]
Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to forecast the Available Capacity of the Project
accurately and to transmit such information in a format reasonably acceptable to Buyer. Buyer
and Seller shall agree upon reasonable changes to the requirements and procedures set forth
below from time-to-time, as necessary.
1. Annual Forecast of Available Capacity. No later than (I) the earlier of
July 1 of the first calendar year following the Execution Date or one hundred and eighty (180)
days before the first day of the first Contract Year of the Delivery Term (“First Annual Forecast
Date”), and (II) on or before July 1 for each calendar year from the First Annual Forecast Date
for every subsequent Contract Year during the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide to Buyer a
non-binding forecast of the hourly Available Capacity for each day in each month of the
following calendar year in a form reasonably acceptable to Buyer.
2. Monthly Forecast of Available Capacity. Ten (10) Business Days before
the beginning of each month during the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide to Buyer a non-
binding forecast of the hourly Available Capacity for each day of the following month in a form
reasonably acceptable to Buyer.
*** End of Appendix C ***
Page 814
D-42-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix D – Description of the Facility
Seller should complete the information below and attach a description of the Facility,
including a summary of its significant components, a drawing showing the general arrangements
of the Facility, and a single line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility and loads
with Buyer’s electric distribution system.
Name of the Facility:
Address of the Facility:
Description of the Facility, including a summary of its significant components, such as
for solar photovoltaic [Photovoltaic Modules, DC Collection System, Current Inverters],
meteorological station, instrumentation and any other related electrical equipment:
Drawing showing the general arrangement of the Facility:
A single-line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility with Buyer:
A legal description of the Site, including a Site map:
Longitude and latitude of the centroid of the Site:
*** End of Appendix D ***
Page 815
D-43-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
APPENDIX E – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE PPA
MILESTONES AND EXAMPLE ACTION STEPS
Action Deadline Date Completed Responsible Party
Step 1: Submit Application Seller
Step 2: Approve Application Buyer
Step 3: Sign Conditional PPA Both
Step 4: Acquire Interconnection Agreement Seller
Step 4A: Submit copy of Interconnection Agreement to
Buyer
Seller
Step 5: Submit confirmation of RPS precertification
requirement and provide Copy of precertification
application to Buyer
Seller
Step 6: File Project with WREGIS and submit proof to
Buyer.
Seller
Step 7: Pay Interconnection Fee and submit proof to
Buyer.
Seller
Step 8: Acquire Conditional Use Permit and
Construction Permits
Seller
Step 8A: Submit proof of permits to Buyer. Seller
Step 9: Notify Buyer 10 days prior to construction start. Seller
Step 10: Submit proof of insurance to Buyer. Seller
Step 11: Mechanical Completion. Seller
Step 12: Notify Buyer 30 days in advance of the
Commercial Operation Date.
Seller
Step 12: Commercial Operation Date Seller
Step 13: Submit application for certification to CEC. Seller
*** End of Appendix E ***
Page 816
D-44-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix F – Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule
Dated: XXXXX XX, 20XX
Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule
Contract Year Contract Quantity (kWh/Yr) Phase Effective Date
1 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
2 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
3 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
4 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
5 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
6 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
7 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
8 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
9 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
10 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
11 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
12 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
13 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
14 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
15 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
16 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
17 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
18 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
19 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
20 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
21 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
22 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
23 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
24 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
25 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX
*** End of Appendix F***
Page 817
D-45-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix G – Notices List
Name: ______(“Seller”) Name: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
(“Buyer” or “RCMU”)
All Notices: [Seller to complete] All Notices:
Delivery Address: Delivery Address:
Street:
City: State: Zip:
Mail Address: (if different from above) Mail Address:
Attn: Attn:
Phone: Phone:
Facsimile: Facsimile:
DUNS: DUNS:
Federal Tax ID Number: Federal Tax ID Number:
Invoices: Invoices:
Attn: Attn:
Phone: Phone:
Facsimile: Facsimile:
Payments: Payments:
Attn: Attn:
Phone: Phone:
Facsimile: Facsimile:
Wire Transfer: Wire Transfer:
BNK:
ABA:
ACCT:
BNK:
ABA:
ACCT:
Credit and Collections: Credit and Collections:
Attn: Attn:
Phone: Phone:
Facsimile: Facsimile:
With additional Notices of an Event of
Default to Contract Manager:
Contract Manager:
Attn: Attn:
Page 818
D-46-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Phone: Phone:
Facsimile:
*** End of Appendix G***
Page 819
D-47-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix H – FORM OF LETTER OF CREDIT
Issuing Bank Letterhead and Address
STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. XXXXXXXX
Date: [insert issue date]
Beneficiary: City of Rancho Cucamonga Applicant: [Insert name and address of
Applicant]
Attention:
Letter of Credit Amount: [insert amount]
Expiry Date: [insert expiry date]
Ladies and Gentlemen:
By order of [insert name of Applicant] (“Applicant”), we hereby issue in favor of City of
Rancho Cucamonga (the “Beneficiary”) our irrevocable standby letter of credit No. [insert
number of letter of credit] (“Letter of Credit”), for the account of Applicant, for drawings up to
but not to exceed the aggregate sum of U.S. $ [insert amount in figures followed by (amount
in words)] (“Letter of Credit Amount”). This Letter of Credit is available with [insert name of
issuing bank, and the city and state in which it is located] by sight payment, at our offices
located at the address stated below, effective immediately, and it will expire at our close of
business on [insert expiry date] (the “Expiry Date”).
Funds under this Letter of Credit are available to the Beneficiary against presentation of the
following documents:
1. Beneficiary’s signed and dated sight draft in the form of Exhibit A hereto, referencing this
Letter of Credit No. [insert number] and stating the amount of the demand; and
2. One of the following statements signed by an authorized representative or officer of
Beneficiary:
A. “Pursuant to the terms of that certain [insert name of the agreement] (the
“Agreement”), dated [insert date of the Agreement], between Beneficiary and [insert
name of Seller under the Agreement], Beneficiary is entitled to draw under Letter of
Page 820
D-48-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Credit No. [insert number] amounts owed by [insert name of Seller under the
Agreement] under the Agreement; or
B. “Letter of Credit No. [insert number] will expire in thirty (30) days or less and [insert
name of Seller under the Agreement] has not provided replacement security acceptable to
Beneficiary.
Special Conditions:
1. Partial and multiple drawings under this Letter of Credit are allowed;
2. All banking charges associated with this Letter of Credit are for the account of the Applicant;
3. This Letter of Credit is not transferable; and
4. The Expiry Date of this Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended without a written
amendment for a period of one year and on each successive Expiry Date, unless at least sixty
(60) days before the then current Expiry Date, we notify you by registered mail or courier
that we elect not to extend the Expiry Date of this Letter of Credit for such additional period.
We engage with you that drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of
Credit will be duly honored upon presentation, on or before the Expiry Date (or after the Expiry
Date as provided below), at our offices at [insert issuing bank’s address for drawings].
All demands for payment shall be made by presentation of originals or copies of documents; or
by facsimile transmission of documents to [insert fax number], Attention: [insert name of
issuing bank’s receiving department], with originals or copies of documents to follow by
overnight mail. If presentation is made by facsimile transmission, you may contact us at [insert
phone number] to confirm our receipt of the transmission. Your failure to seek such a
telephone confirmation does not affect our obligation to honor such a presentation.
Our payments against complying presentations under this Letter of Credit will be made no later
than on the sixth (6th) banking day following a complying presentation.
Except as stated herein, this Letter of Credit is not subject to any condition or qualification. It is
our individual obligation, which is not contingent upon reimbursement and is not affected by any
agreement, document, or instrument between us and the Applicant or between the Beneficiary
and the Applicant or any other party.
Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, this Letter of Credit is subject to and governed by
the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision, International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Publication No. 600 (the “UCP 600”); provided that, if this Letter
of Credit expires during an interruption of our business as described in Article 36 of the UCP
600, we will honor drafts presented in compliance with this Letter of Credit within thirty (30)
days after the resumption of our business and effect payment accordingly.
The law of the State of California shall apply to any matters not covered by the UCP 600.
Page 821
D-49-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
For telephone assistance regarding this Letter of Credit, please contact us at [insert number and
any other necessary details].
Very truly yours,
[insert name of issuing bank]
By:
Authorized Signature
Name: [print or type name]
Title:
*** End of Appendix H***
Page 822
D-50-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Appendix I – FORM OF CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT
CONSENT AND AGREEMENT
This CONSENT AND AGREEMENT (“Consent and Agreement”) is entered into as of
[_______ __, 2___], between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (“RCMU”), and
[_________________] , as collateral agent (in such capacity, “Financing Provider”), for the
benefit of various financial institutions (collectively, the “Secured Parties”) providing financing
to [_______] (“Seller”). RCMU, Seller, and the Financing Provider shall each individually be
referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.
Recitals
A. Pursuant to that certain Power Purchase Agreement dated as of _____________,
2___ (as amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time, as including all related
agreements, instruments and documents, collectively, the “Assigned Agreement”) between
RCMU and Seller, RCMU has agreed to purchase energy from Seller.
B. The Secured Parties have provided, or have agreed to provide, to Seller financing
(including a financing lease) pursuant to one or more agreements (the “Financing Documents”),
and require that Financing Provider be provided certain rights with respect to the “Assigned
Agreement” and the “Assigned Agreement Accounts,” each as defined below, in connection with
such financing.
C. In consideration for the execution and delivery of the Assigned Agreement,
RCMU has agreed to enter into this Consent and Agreement for the benefit of Seller.
Agreement
1. Definitions. Any capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning
specified for such term in the Assigned Agreement.
2. Consent. Subject to the terms and conditions below, RCMU consents to and approves the
pledge and assignment by Seller to Financing Provider pursuant to the Loan Agreement and/or
Security Agreement of (a) the Assigned Agreement, and (b) the accounts, revenues and proceeds
of the Assigned Agreement (collectively, the “Assigned Agreement Accounts”).
3. Limitations on Assignment. Financing Provider acknowledges and confirms that,
notwithstanding any provision to the contrary under applicable law or in any Financing
Document executed by Seller, Financing Provider shall not assume, sell or otherwise dispose of
the Assigned Agreement (whether by foreclosure sale, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or
otherwise) unless, on or before the date of any such assumption, sale or disposition, Financing
Provider or any third party, as the case may be, assuming, purchasing or otherwise acquiring the
Page 823
D-51-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Assigned Agreement (a) cures any and all defaults of Seller under the Assigned Agreement
which are capable of being cured and which are not personal to the Seller, (b) executes and
delivers to RCMU a written assumption of all of Seller’s rights and obligations under the
Assigned Agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to RCMU, (c) otherwise
satisfies and complies with all requirements of the Assigned Agreement, (d) provides such tax
and enforceability assurance as RCMU may reasonably request, and (e) is a Permitted Transferee
(as defined below). Financing Provider further acknowledges that the assignment of the
Assigned Agreement and the Assigned Agreement Accounts is for security purposes only and
that Financing Provider has no rights under the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement
Accounts to enforce the provisions of the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement
Accounts unless and until an event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Financing
Documents between Seller and Financing Provider (a “Financing Default”), in which case
Financing Provider shall be entitled to all of the rights and benefits and subject to all of the
obligations which Seller then has or may have under the Assigned Agreement to the same extent
and in the same manner as if Financing Provider were an original party to the Assigned
Agreement.
“Permitted Transferee” means any person or entity who is reasonably acceptable to RCMU.
Financing Provider may from time to time, following the occurrence of a Financing Default,
notify RCMU in writing of the identity of a proposed transferee of the Assigned Agreement,
which proposed transferee may include Financing Provider, in connection with the enforcement
of Financing Provider’s rights under the Financing Documents, and RCMU shall, within thirty
(30) business days of its receipt of such written notice, confirm to Financing Provider whether or
not such proposed transferee is a “Permitted Transferee” (together with a written statement of the
reason(s) for any negative determination) it being understood that if RCMU shall fail to so
respond within such thirty (30) business day period such proposed transferee shall be deemed to
be a “Permitted Transferee”.
4. Cure Rights.
(a) Notice to Financing Provider by RCMU. RCMU shall, concurrently with the
delivery of any notice of an event of default under the Assigned Agreement (each, an “Event of
Default”) to Seller (a “Default Notice”), provide a copy of such Default Notice to Financing
Provider pursuant to Section 9(a) of this Consent and Agreement. In addition, Seller shall
provide a copy of the Default Notice to Financing Provider the next business day after receipt
from RCMU, independent of any agreement of RCMU to deliver such Default Notice.
(b) Cure Period Available to Financing Provider Prior to Any Termination by
RCMU. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, subject to (i) the expiration of the relevant
cure periods provided to Seller under the Assigned Agreement, and (ii) Section 4(a) above,
RCMU shall not terminate the Assigned Agreement unless it or Seller provides Financing
Provider with notice of the Event of Default and affords Financing Provider an Additional Cure
Period (as defined below) to cure such Event of Default. For purposes of this Agreement
“Additional Cure Period” means (i) with respect to a monetary default, ten (10) days in addition
to the cure period (if any) provided to Seller in the Assigned Agreement, and (ii) with respect to
a non-monetary default, thirty (30) days in addition to the cure period (if any) provided to Seller
in the Assigned Agreement.
Page 824
D-52-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
(c) Failure by RCMU to Deliver Default Notice. If neither RCMU nor Seller
delivers a Default Notice to Financing Provider as provided in Section 4(a), the Financing
Provider’s applicable cure period shall begin on the date on which notice of an Event of Default
is delivered to Financing Provider by either RCMU or Seller. Except for a delay in the
commencement of the cure period for Financing Provider and a delay in RCMU’s ability to
terminate the Assigned Agreement (in each case only if both RCMU and Seller fail to deliver
notice of an Event of Default to Financing Provider), failure of RCMU to deliver any Default
Notice shall not waive RCMU’s right to take any action under the Assigned Agreement and will
not subject RCMU to any damages or liability for failure to provide such notice.
(d) Extension for Foreclosure Proceedings. If possession of the Project (as defined in
the Assigned Agreement) is necessary for Financing Provider to cure an Event of Default and
Financing Provider commences foreclosure proceedings against Seller within thirty (30) days of
receiving notice of an Event of Default from RCMU or Seller, whichever is received first,
Financing Provider shall be allowed a reasonable additional period to complete such foreclosure
proceedings, such period not to exceed ninety (90) days; provided, however, that Financing
Provider shall provide a written notice to RCMU that it intends to commence foreclosure
proceedings with respect to Seller within ten (10) business days of receiving a notice of such
Event of Default from RCMU or Seller, whichever is received first. In the event Financing
Provider succeeds to Seller’s interest in the Project as a result of foreclosure proceedings, the
Financing Provider or a purchaser or grantee pursuant to such foreclosure shall be subject to the
requirements of Section 3 of this Consent and Agreement.
5. Setoffs and Deductions. Each of Seller and Financing Provider agrees that RCMU shall
have the right to set off or deduct from payments due to Seller each and every amount due
RCMU from Seller whether or not arising out of or in connection with the Assigned Agreement.
Financing Provider further agrees that it takes the assignment for security purposes of the
Assigned Agreement and the Assigned Agreement Accounts subject to any defenses or causes of
action RCMU may have against Seller.
6. No Representation or Warranty. Seller and Financing Provider each recognizes and
acknowledges that RCMU makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, that Seller
has any right, title, or interest in the Assigned Agreement or as to the priority of the assignment
for security purposes of the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement Accounts.
Financing Provider is responsible for satisfying itself as to the existence and extent of Seller’s
right, title, and interest in the Assigned Agreement, and Financing Provider releases RCMU from
any liability resulting from the assignment for security purposes of the Assigned Agreement and
the Assigned Agreement Accounts.
7. Amendment to Assigned Agreement. Financing Provider acknowledges and agrees that
RCMU may agree with Seller to modify or amend the Assigned Agreement, and that RCMU is
not obligated to notify Financing Provider of any such amendment or modification to the
Assigned Agreement. Financing Provider hereby releases RCMURCMU from all liability
arising out of or in connection with the making of any amendment or modification to the
Assigned Agreement.
Page 825
D-53-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
8. Payments under Assigned Agreement. RCMU shall make all payments due to Seller
under the Assigned Agreement from and after the date hereof to [__________], as depositary
agent, to ABA No. [__________], Account No. [__________], and Seller hereby irrevocably
consents to any and all such payments being made in such manner. Each of Seller, RCMU and
Financing Provider agrees that each such payment by RCMU to such depositary agent of
amounts due to Seller from RCMU under the Assigned Agreement shall satisfy RCMU’s
corresponding payment obligation under the Assigned Agreement.
9. Miscellaneous.
(a) Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed received
(i) at the close of business of the date of receipt, if delivered by hand or by facsimile or other
electronic means, or (ii) when signed for by recipient, if sent registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, provided such notice was properly addressed to the appropriate address indicated on the
signature page hereof or to such other address as a party may designate by prior written notice to
the other parties, at the address set forth below:
If to Financing
Provider:
Name:
Address:
Attn:
Telephone:
Facsimile:
Email:
If to RCMU:
Name:
Address:
Attn:
Telephone:
Facsimile:
Email:
(b) No Assignment. This Consent and Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of RCMU, and shall be binding on and inure to
the benefit of the Financing Provider, the Secured Parties and their respective successors and
permitted transferees and assigns under the loan agreement and/or security agreement.
Page 826
D-54-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
(c) No Modification. This Consent and Agreement is neither a modification of nor an
amendment to the Assigned Agreement.
(d) Choice of Law. The parties hereto agree that this Consent and Agreement shall
be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding
any choice of law rules which may direct the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.
(e) No Waiver. No term, covenant or condition hereof shall be deemed waived and
no breach excused unless such waiver or excuse shall be in writing and signed by the party
claimed to have so waived or excused.
(f) Counterparts. This Consent and Agreement may be executed in one or more
duplicate counterparts, and when executed and delivered by all the parties listed below, shall
constitute a single binding agreement.
(g) No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third party beneficiaries to this
Consent and Agreement.
(h) Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Consent
and Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this
Consent and Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
(i) Amendments. This Consent and Agreement may be modified, amended, or
rescinded only by writing expressly referring to this Consent and Agreement and signed by all
parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of RCMU and Financing Provider has duly executed this
Consent and Agreement as of the date first written above.
City of Rancho Cucamonga (RCMU)
By: _________________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: ________________________________
[____________________________________]
(Financing Provider), as collateral agent
By: _________________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: ________________________________
Page 827
D-55-
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The undersigned hereby acknowledges the Consent and Agreement set forth above, makes the
agreements set forth therein as applicable to Seller, including the obligation of Seller to provide a
copy of any Default Notice it receives from RCMU to Financing Provider the next business day
after receipt by Seller, and confirms that the Financing Provider identified above and the Secured
Parties have provided or are providing financing to the undersigned.
[________________________][name of Seller]
By: _________________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: ________________________________
*** End of Appendix I***
Page 828
E-1
11231-0001\2567614v10.doc
Exhibit “E”
RCMU Connections
Page 829
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 830
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 831
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 832
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 833
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 834
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 835
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 836
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 837
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 838
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 839
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 840
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 841
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 842
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 843
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 844
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 845
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 846
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 847
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 848
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 849
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 850
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 851
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 852
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH No. 2020100056)
PREPARED FOR THE BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
LLC PROJECT WHICH PROPOSES THE DEVELOPMENT OF
TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 2,175,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY
LOCATED APPROXIAMTELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA
ANITA, AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA
AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET AND SOUTH OF 6TH STREET
– APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 51, MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT
TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
A.Recitals.
1.Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed a development application for General
Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267), Tentative
Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree Removal Permit
(DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development Agreement
(DRC2021-00180) for a development project as described in the title of this Resolution
(collectively, the “Project”).
2.In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State
CEQA Guidelines, the City concluded that there was substantial evidence that the Project might
have a significant environmental impact on several resources and determined that an EIR must
be prepared for the Project in order to analyze the Project’s potential impacts on the environment.
3.Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082, on October 2, 2020, the City published
a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR for the Project, and circulated the NOP and initial
study to the Office of Planning and Research, the County Clerk, responsible and trustee agencies,
governmental agencies, organizations, and persons who may be interested in the application for
a 30-day public review period.
4.The City received comments from California Department of Fish and Wildlife,
California Department of Transportation, Native American Heritage Commission, Southcoast Air
Quality Management District, and Inland Empire Biking Alliance in response to the NOP.
5.After providing notice to the required tribes under AB 52 and SB 18, the City initiated
consultation with one tribe in the area, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation, and
comments were also received from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, in accordance with
the City’s obligations under AB 52 and SB 18.
6.The City released the Draft EIR for a 45-day public review period beginning May 7,
2021 and ending on June 21, 2021. During the public review period the City received a total of 3
comment letters on the Draft EIR that required responses, and the City has prepared responses
to each comment.
Attachment 12
Page 853
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-111
BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC FINAL EIR CERTIFICATION AND CEQA
FINDINGS
October 20, 2021
Page 2
7. The EIR concludes that with the inclusion of mitigation measures, the Project will not
have a significant impact on any environmental resources.
8. The City prepared a Final EIR in accordance with CEQA, which contains the City’s
responses to comments, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project,
the Draft EIR as modified by the Final EIR, and all appendices.
9. On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider recommending the Project to the City Council for final consideration and
concluded the hearing on that date.
10. On October 20, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the Project and concluded the hearing on that date.
11.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Findings. Based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR,
together with its appendices, and all other available evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports
and public testimony, and upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City
Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded due
notice and an opportunity to comment on the EIR and the Project.
b.Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before
approving the Project, make one or more of the following written findings for each significant effect
identified in the Final EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding:
i.Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in
the Final EIR;
ii.Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and
jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have
been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or
iii.Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other
considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
Page 854
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-111
BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC FINAL EIR CERTIFICATION AND CEQA
FINDINGS
October 20, 2021
Page 3
These required findings are set forth in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by this reference.
c. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less
than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section III.B of Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
d. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant,
but that can be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation, are described in Section
III.C of Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
e.No environmental impacts were identified in the Final EIR as significant and
unavoidable despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, and a statement further
confirming this conclusion is provided in Section I of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
f.State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and Public Resources Code
Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to assure compliance
with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is
attached hereto as Exhibit B and is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Further, the
mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project.
g.Prior to taking action on the Final EIR and approving the Project, the City
Council specifically finds and certifies that: (1) the Final EIR was presented to the City Council;
(2) the City Council reviewed and considered the Final EIR and all of the information and data in
the administrative record, and all oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and
hearings; (3) the Final EIR is adequate and has been completed in full compliance with CEQA;
and (4) the Final EIR reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis.
h.No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have
produced any substantial new information requiring additional recirculation or additional
environmental review of the Project under CEQA.
3. Determination. On the basis of the foregoing and all of the evidence in the
administrative record before it, the City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR, adopts findings
pursuant to the CEQA as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) attached hereto
as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
4.Location of Record. The documents and other materials, including the staff
reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, and specifications, that constitute the record on
which this Resolution is based are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of
the Planning Director, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. All such
documents are incorporated herein by reference.
5.Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Page 855
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-111
BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC FINAL EIR CERTIFICATION AND CEQA
FINDINGS
October 20, 2021
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day
of October 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 856
1
FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF DETERMINATIONS
RELATED TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15090, 15091 and 15093
For
BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT
Final Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse No. 2020100056)
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga
I.INTRODUCTION
The following findings of fact are based in part on the information contained in the Draft and Final
Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project (“Project”),
as well as additional facts found in the complete record of proceedings. The EIR is hereby
incorporated by reference and is available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Department (10500 Civic Center Drive) and on the City’s website:
https://www.cityofrc.us/community-development/planning
Public Resources Code Section 21002 provides that “public agencies should not approve projects
as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]” The same statute
provides that the procedures required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) “are
intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of
projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or
substantially lessen such significant effects.” Section 21002 goes on to provide that “in the event
specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such
mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects
thereof.”
The mandate and principles announced in Public Resources Code section 21002 are implemented,
in part, through the requirement that agencies must adopt findings before approving projects for
which EIRs are required. For each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a
project, the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three permissible
conclusions. Specifically, Section 15091(a) of the CEQA guidelines states:
(a)No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been
certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the
project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of
those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for
each finding. The possible findings are:
Page 857
2
1.Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the final EIR.
2.Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of
another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes
have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such
other agency.
3.Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations,
including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained
workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives
identified in the final EIR.
Public Resources Code section 21061.1 defines “feasible” to mean “capable of being accomplished
in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic,
environmental, social, legal, and technological factors.” CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds
another factor: “legal” considerations. (See also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Bd. of Supervisors
(1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta II).)
For purposes of these Findings (including the table described below), the term “avoid” refers to the
effectiveness of one or more mitigation measures to reduce an otherwise potentially significant
effect to a less than significant level. Although CEQA Guidelines section 15091 requires only that
approving agencies specify that a particular significant effect is “avoid[ed] or substantially
lessen[ed],” these Findings, for purposes of clarity, in each case will specify whether the effect in
question has been “avoided” (i.e., reduced to a less than significant level).
With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a
public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency
first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the
agency found that the project’s “benefits” rendered “acceptable” its “unavoidable adverse
environmental effects.” (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources
Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The EIR for the Project concluded the Project would not result in any
significant and unavoidable impacts; thus, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is not required
for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project.
These Findings constitute the City’s best efforts to set forth the evidentiary and policy bases for its
decision to approve the Project in a manner consistent with the requirements of CEQA. To the
extent that these Findings conclude that various mitigation measures outlined in the Final EIR are
feasible and have not been modified, superseded or withdrawn, the City hereby binds itself to
implement these measures as measures built into the design of the Project itself or as conditions of
Project approval. (See Public Resources Code § 21081.6, subd. (b); Guidelines, § 15126.4, subd.
(a)(2).) These Findings, in other words, are not merely informational, but rather constitute a
binding set of obligations that will come into effect when the City Council adopts a resolution
approving the Project.
In addition, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the
Project, and is being approved by the City Council by the same Resolution that has adopted these
Findings. The City will use the MMRP to track compliance with Project mitigation measures. The
MMRP will remain available for public review during the compliance period. The Final MMRP is
attached to and incorporated into the EIR certification resolution and is approved in conjunction
with certification of the EIR and adoption of these Findings of Fact. In the event of any conflict
Page 858
3
between these Findings and the MMRP with respect to the requirements of an adopted mitigation
measure, the more stringent measure shall control.
II.FINDINGS CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
When approving a project for which an EIR has been prepared, the lead agency must certify that
the EIR complies with CEQA, that the EIR reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and
analysis, and that the EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the lead agency, which
reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR before approving the project. (Public
Resources Code § 21082.1, subd. (c); Guidelines, § 15090, subd. (a).)
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby finds, determines and certifies that the EIR complies
with CEQA, for reasons explained in the entire record of proceedings, including but not limited to
the EIR itself, staff reports, oral testimony, and technical studies. The Council hereby finds,
determines and certifies that that City Staff has reviewed the EIR as has an independent CEQA
consultant under contract to the City and the EIR reflects the City’s independent judgment and
analysis. The Council also hereby finds, determines and certifies that the EIR was presented to the
Council, and that the Council reviewed and considered the information in the draft and final EIR
before approving the Project.
III.FINDINGS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF
THE PROJECT
In compliance with Section 15201 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has taken steps to provide
opportunities for public participation in the environmental review process. A Notice of Preparation
(NOP) was distributed on October 2, 2020, to potential Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies,
and other interested parties for a 30-day public review period to solicit comments and to inform
agencies and the public of the Project. The Project was described; potential environmental effects
associated with Project implementation were identified; and agencies and the public were invited
to review and comment on the NOP. The City received five responses to the NOP after the end of
the scoping period. Table 2-1 of the Draft EIR summarizes the NOP comments addressing
environmental and related issues. Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a virtual
scoping meeting for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Draft EIR on October 15, 2020. The
public scoping meeting was held virtually in accordance with San Bernardino County Department
of Public Health requirements in effect at the time. In addition to City staff and Project Applicant
representatives, the meeting was attended by two members of the Laborers’ International Union of
North America (LIUNA). The LIUNA members indicated support for the Project. No comments
on the scope of the Draft EIR were raised at the public scoping meeting.
Based on the NOP, and on public comments received during scoping, the City identified
environmental issues for which the Project would result in no impacts or less than significant
impacts, and therefore these issues were not discussed in detail in the EIR. This includes the entirety
of the Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Mineral Resources, Public Services, Recreation, and
Wildfire topical areas. Refer to Section 6.1, Effects Determined Not to be Significant, for a
summary discussion of the environmental effects which were found not to be significant.
To address potentially significant environmental effects in the remaining topical areas, an EIR was
prepared for this Project in accordance with CEQA, and taking into consideration input received
during the EIR scoping process. As required by CEQA, the EIR includes appropriate review,
analysis, and mitigation measures for the environmental impacts of the Project. This Final EIR
Page 859
4
could be utilized by other permitting agencies in their capacity as Responsible and Trustee agencies
under CEQA.
A Draft EIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period, beginning on May 7,
2021, and concluding on June 21, 2021. The Notice of Availability advertising the electronic
location and availability of the Draft EIR was provided to the Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research via the CEQAnet Web Portal for distribution to relevant State agencies; published in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin; mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site;
mailed to all responsible agencies, individuals and stakeholders who had requested notification;
and, posted at the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The Draft EIR was
also available on the City’s website, at City Hall, the Archibald Library, and the Paul A. Biane
Library.
Three written comment letters from an agency, an organization, and an individual were received
on the Draft EIR; one comment letter was received during the public review period and two
comment letters were received after the end of the public review period. Responses to these
comments, including comments received after the end of the public review period, were prepared
and are included in the Final EIR. It should be noted that the existence of differing opinions arising
from the same pool of information is not a basis for finding the EIR to be inadequate; when
approving an EIR, an agency need not correctly resolve a dispute among experts about the accuracy
of the EIR's environmental forecasts.
Additionally, pursuant to Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, responses to comments from a
public agency were transmitted 10 days prior to the public hearing for the Project and certification
of the Final EIR. Although not required by the CEQA Guidelines, written responses were also
provided to other commenters at the same time.
For the purposes of CEQA, and the findings herein set forth, the administrative record for the
Project consists of those items listed in Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e).
The record of proceedings for the City’s decision on the Project consists of the following
documents, at a minimum, which are incorporated by reference and made part of the record
supporting these Findings:
•The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Project;
•The Draft EIR for the Project and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference;
•All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment
period on the Draft EIR;
•All comments and correspondence submitted to the City during the public comment period
on the Draft EIR, in addition to all other timely comments on the Draft EIR;
•The Final EIR for the Project, including the Planning and Historic Commission staff report,
minutes of the Planning Commission public hearing; City Council staff report; minutes of
the City Council public hearing; comments received on the Draft EIR; the City’s responses
to those comments; technical appendices; and all documents relied upon or incorporated
by reference;
•The mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) for the Project;
•All findings and resolutions adopted by the City in connection with the Project, and all
documents cited or referred to therein;
Page 860
5
•All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating
to the Project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee
agencies with respect to the City’s compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with
respect to the City’s action on the Project;
•All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in
connection with the Project, up through the close of the public hearing;
•Any minutes and/or verbatim transcripts of all information sessions, public meetings, and
public hearings held by the City in connection with the Project;
•Any documentary or other evidence submitted to the City at such information sessions,
public meetings and public hearings;
•All resolutions adopted by the City regarding the Project, and all staff reports, analyses,
and summaries related to the adoption of those resolutions;
•The City’s General Plan and all updates and related environmental analyses;
•Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations;
•The City’s Zoning Code;
•Any documents expressly cited in these Findings, in addition to those cited above; and
•Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code
section 21167.6, subdivision (e).
Pursuant to Guidelines Section 15091(e), the administrative record of these proceedings is located
and available by appointment for review at 10500 Civic Center Drive, during normal business
hours. The custodian of these documents and other materials is the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department.
The City has relied on all of the documents listed above in reaching its decisions on the Project
even if not every document was formally presented to the City Council or City Staff as part of the
City files generated in connection with the Project. Documents set forth above that are not found
in the Project files fall into two categories. The first category includes prior planning or legislative
decisions of which the City was aware in approving the Project. (See City of Santa Cruz v. Local
Agency Formation Commission (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 381, 391-391; Dominey v. Department of
Personnel Administration (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 729, 738, fn. 6.) The second category includes
documents that influenced the expert advice provided to City Staff or consultants, who then
provided advice to the Planning Commission and the City Council as final decision maker. Such
documents form part of the underlying factual basis for the City’s decisions relating to approval of
the Project. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21167.6, subd. (e)(10); Browning-Ferris Industries v. City
Council of City of San Jose (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v.
County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 153, 155.)
Based upon the evidence before it, the City finds that the Project will not result in any significant
and unavoidable impacts; therefore, a statement of overriding considerations is not required.
The EIR’s analysis of each topical issue describes applicable Regulatory Requirements (RR)s and
Project-specific Mitigation Measures (MMs). These components are described below.
Page 861
6
•Regulatory Requirements. RRs are based on federal, State, or local regulations or laws
that are frequently required independently of CEQA review and also serve to offset or
prevent specific impacts. The City may impose additional conditions on the Project during
the approval process, as appropriate, including those that are standard to all projects, typical
to a project of a particular nature, or specific to the proposal.
•Mitigation Measures. Where a potentially significant environmental effect has been
identified and is not reduced to a level considered less than significant through the
application of RRs, Project-specific MMs have been recommended in accordance with
CEQA and are included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP).
The Findings below describe in detail the MMs in the EIR, since these measures prevent or reduce
the significance of impacts that the Project would otherwise potentially have on the environment.
These Findings refer to RRs to the extent that they are relevant to the City’s analysis of
environmental effects, but the full text of the RRs is not provided below. For the details of
applicable RRs, please see the appropriate text in the EIR, which these Findings incorporate by
reference.
The Findings below describe numbered impacts (e.g., Impact 1.1) that were analyzed in detail in
the EIR. Impacts are presented below in summary form. For a detailed description of impacts,
please see the appropriate text of the EIR, which these Findings incorporate by reference. Based on
the analysis of impacts in the EIR, the EIR concludes that so significant and unavoidable impacts
would result from the Project.
A. PROJECT SUMMARY
The approximately 91.4 gross acre Project site is located at 12434 4th Street, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Project site is bounded by 4th Street to the
south (which is also the jurisdictional boundary between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the
City of Ontario) and 6th Street to the north, and generally located between Etiwanda Avenue to the
east and Santa Anita Avenue to the west. The Project site is located within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Southeast Focus Area, as designated in the General Plan, which is comprised primarily
of industrial land uses and is generally bound by I-15 to the west, the City’s jurisdictional
boundaries to the east and south, and Foothill Boulevard Focus Area to the north.
The southern portion of the Project site is currently occupied by a 23,240 square foot (sf) retail
building, a 1,431,000-sf warehouse building, and associated facilities. There are existing surface
parking lots (auto and truck trailer) and vacant land (previously a vineyard) in the northern portion
of the Project site. Big Lots vacated the Project site in February 2020, after which it was marketed
for new tenants. Reoccupation of the existing buildings and on-going operations at the site were
appropriately assumed for baseline conditions evaluated in the EIR. Geodis occupied the site from
October 2020 to May 2021.
The Project includes redevelopment of the Project site with two new contemporary warehouse
buildings (Buildings 1 and 2) with a combined building area, including the mezzanine space, of
approximately 2,175,000 sf consisting of 2,134,000 sf of warehouse uses and 41,000 square feet of
ancillary office space. The Project also includes construction of a new public roadway referred to
as Street “A”, which would extend north-south along the eastern boundary of the Project site
between 4th Street and 6th Street. Additional on-site improvements associated with the Project
include, but are not limited to, surface parking areas (automobile and truck trailer spaces ancillary
Page 862
7
to operation of the two buildings), vehicle drive aisles, landscaping, storm water quality/storage,
utility infrastructure, and exterior lighting.
In addition to certification of the Project’s Final EIR and these Findings of Fact, the Project also
involves the following discretionary approvals as described in Section 1.4.4, Required Permits and
Discretionary Actions, of the Final EIR: General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Site
Plan and Architectural Review, Minor Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map No. 20271, Development
Agreement, and Tree Removal Permit.
B.FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTS DETERMINED TO HAVE NO
IMPACT OR LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITHOUT MITIGATION
MEASURES
The City agrees with the characterization in the Final EIR with respect to impacts identified as “no
impact” or "less than significant impact" and finds that, based upon substantial evidence in the
record, as discussed below, the following impacts associated with the Project are not significant or
are less than significant, and do not require mitigation, as described in the Final EIR. Under CEQA,
no mitigation measures are required for impacts that are less than significant. (Pub. Resources
Code, § 21002; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15126.4, subd. (a)(3); 15091.) Note that impacts are
presented below in summary form. For a full description of impacts, see the appropriate text in the
EIR, which the Council hereby incorporates by reference into these Findings.
1.Aesthetics
Impact 1.1: The Project, including site-adjacent improvements and the 6th Street at-grade crossing,
would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, resulting in a less than significant
impact. Further, trees removed by the Project would be replaced in accordance with City’s
requirements (refer to RR 3-3 and RR 3-4).
Impact 1.2: The Project site is not within a State scenic highway and is not in proximity to a State
scenic highway. The Project does not have the potential to degrade scenic resources within a State
scenic highway and no impacts would occur.
Impact 1.3: The Project site is within an urbanized area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As
such, the analysis for this threshold is based on the review of the potential for the Project to conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. The Project would not
conflict with the applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, including
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code standards and General Plan polices. No impact would
occur.
Impact 1.4: The Project site is located in an urban area, which includes existing sources of light
and glare. The Project involves redevelopment of the Project site and would not create a new source
of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Impacts
would be less than significant.
2.Agriculture and Forestry Resources
As identified in the NOP, there is no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance, forest land, or timberland on or near the Project site. The Project would result in no
impacts to agriculture and forestry resources.
Page 863
8
3.Air Quality
Impact 2.3: The Project would not expose sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, workers or school
children) to substantial pollutant concentrations, including localized criteria pollutant emissions
during construction and operation, mobile source and construction-related diesel particulate matter
(DPM) emissions, or carbon monoxide (CO) “Hot Spots”. Impacts would be less than significant.
Impact 2.4 The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors)
adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and would adhere to applicable regulatory
requirements addressing odor emissions (refer to RR 2-1 and RR 2-5). Impacts would be less than
significant.
4.Biological Resources
Impact 3.1: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, and 6th Street at-grade crossing
study area consist of two land cover types that would be classified as disturbed and developed.
These areas do not support native plant communities, nor do they provide suitable habitat for
sensitive plant or wildlife species. Therefore, the Project would not impact Candidate, Sensitive, or
Special Status species. No impact would occur.
Impact 3.2 & 3.3: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, and 6th Street at-grade
crossing study area do not support riparian habitat; United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) jurisdictional areas; wetlands; or, sensitive natural communities.
Therefore, no impact would occur. Potential indirect impacts to the ephemeral channel and water
detention basin east of the Project site, which are not within the Project’s impact limits, would be
less than significant with adherence to construction-related water quality protection requirements
(outlined in RR 9-1).
Impact 3.4: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas and 6th Street at-grade crossing
study area do not contain known native wildlife nursery sites and are not within a Wildlife Corridor
or linkage. Vegetation and trees on the Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, 6th Street at-
grade crossing study area, and in the vicinity have the potential to provide suitable nesting
opportunities for avian and raptor species. Compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
(MBTA) and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, as
outlined in RR 3-1 and RR 3-2 would ensure that potential impacts to nesting birds and raptors are
less than significant.
Impact 3.5: The Project would result in the removal of heritage trees; however, the removal of
any heritage trees would be conducted in compliance with the City’s tree protection
policies/requirements, as outlined in RR 3-3 and RR 3-4. No impact would occur related to conflict
with tree protection policies or ordinances.
Impact 3.6: The Project site is not within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural
Communities Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation
plan area. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an
adopted plan and no impacts would occur.
Page 864
9
5. Cultural Resources
Impact 4.1: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Impact 4.3: Construction activities would not disturb known human remains. However, if human
remains are encountered in subsurface soils, they would be handled in accordance with applicable
State regulations (refer to RR 4-1), which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event
human remains are encountered. Potential impacts to human remains would be less than significant.
6. Energy
Impact 5.1 The Project would adhere to the state-mandated provisions of Title 24 Energy
Efficiency Standards and the CalGreen Code, and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, and
RR 5-1 (limits idling). The Project aims to achieve energy conservation goals within the State of
California. As such, the Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, during Project construction or
operation. Impacts would be less than significant.
Impact 5.2: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable
energy or energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant.
7. Geology and Soils
Impact 6.1(i): The Project site is not in a fault hazard area; nor is the Project site within a mapped
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The Project would not expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of
a known earthquake fault. No impact would occur.
Impact 6.1(ii): The Project site is within a seismically active region. As such, the Project’s
proposed structures may be subject to moderate to large seismic events, resulting in strong seismic
ground shaking. As required by RR 6-1 and 6-2, the Project would be required to comply with the
City’s Building Regulations/2019 California Building Code (CBC) and the City’s Grading
Standards, and would be required to incorporate the recommendations from the Geotechnical
Investigation, which would ensure that people and/or structures would not be exposed to potential
substantial adverse effects from strong seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less than
significant.
Impact 6.1(iii): The Project is not located within an area of liquefaction susceptibility. The Project
would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. No impact
would occur.
Impact 6.1 (iv): The Project site and surrounding areas are relatively flat. The Project would not
expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,
or death involving landslides. No impact would occur.
Impact 6.2: The Project site is in a soil erosion hazard area, where soils have a moderate to high
erosion hazard and soil blowing hazard. Construction activities and operations would be conducted
in adherence to City, regional, and State regulations related to management of windblown dust and
other sources of soil erosion (RR 6-3 and RR 6-4). Additionally, construction activities would be
Page 865
10
conducted in compliance regulations pertaining to protection of water quality. With adherence to
existing regulations and requirements, there would be a less than significant impact related to
erosion during construction and operation.
Impact 6.3: The near surface soils encountered at the on-site boring locations consist of artificial
fill soils and native alluvium. Grading of the Project site would be performed in accordance with
the City’s building and grading standards and recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical
Investigation (RR 6-1 and RR 6-2), and impacts related to instability of the site’s geologic materials
would be less than significant.
Impact 6.4: The Project site soils have low expansion potential and no soils would be imported to
the Project site. No impact would occur related to expansive soils.
Impact 6.5: The Project would connect to the City-owned municipal wastewater conveyance
system and would not utilize septic tanks for an alternative wastewater disposal system. The Project
would have no impact related to the use of septic tanks and/or alternative wastewater systems.
8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Impact 7.1: Construction and operation of the Project, which would replace existing buildings,
would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)/City screening
threshold for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and would not generate a net increase in GHG
emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may significantly impact the environment. GHG
emissions impacts would be less than significant. Notwithstanding, the Project Applicant has
agreed to implement additional mitigation measures (revised MM 2-1 and new MM 2-2) identified
in Section III.B.1, below, which would further reduce the Project’s less than significant GHG
emissions.
Impact 7.2: The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted
for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including Senate Bill (SB) 32 and the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) 2017 Scoping Plan, the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), Connect SoCal, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan.
This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required. Notwithstanding, the Project
Applicant has agreed to implement additional mitigation measures (revised MM 2-1 and new MM
2-2), which would further reduce the Project’s less than significant GHG emissions.
9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Impact 8.1 & 8.2: Due to the lack of contaminants that exceed established standards for
commercial/industrial uses, construction of the Project would not result in the exposure of the
public to hazardous materials associated with potential Recognized Environmental Concerns
(RECs). Further, no Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) or Lead Based Paint (LBP) occurs on-
site. Construction and operation of the Project would involve handling of hazardous materials in
limited quantities and typical to urban environments. Through compliance with existing regulations
applicable to the Project (RR 8-1 through RR 8-3) the Project would not pose a significant hazard
to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal
of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which
could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Impacts would be less than
significant.
Page 866
11
Impact 8.3: No existing or proposed schools are located within one-quarter mile of the Project
site. The nearest school to the Project site (Sacred Heart Parish School) is located 1.5 miles to the
north. Accordingly, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school. Additionally, the Project would not cause a significant human health or cancer risk to school
children at the nearest school to the Project site (Sacred Heart Parish School) due to air pollutant
emissions. Impacts would be less than significant.
Impact 8.4: The Project site is located on the State list of underground storage tanks (USTs) and
leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) due to the previous presence of USTs on-site; the on-
site USTs were removed in 1998. During the removal, no petroleum hydrocarbon staining or odors
were noted beneath the USTs. The location of the Project on a site included on a list compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 would not create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Impact 8.5: The Project site is located within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) for the Ontario
International Airport (ONT). The Project site is located outside the safety zones for the ONT;
however, it is within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Height Notification Surface Zone
and near the Airspace Obstruction Surface Zone. The proposed buildings would have a maximum
height of 50-feet, would not require notification of the FAA, and would not cause an obstruction
for aircraft operations. The Project site is also with the Overflight Notification Zone. Although no
safety hazard would result, the Project would adhere to the requirements of the ONT Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan related to Real Estate Disclosure Policy (refer to RR 8-4). The Project
would not result in airport-related safety hazards for people residing or working in the Project area.
Impacts would be less than significant.
Impact 8.6: The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities nor does it serve as an
emergency evacuation route. The Project would not impair implementation of, or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. No impact
would result and no mitigation is required.
Impact 8.7: The Project site is not located within a designated fire hazard area or a Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zone within a Local Responsibility Area. The Project would not expose people or
structures to a significant risk associated with wildland fires. No impact would occur.
10. Hydrology and Water Quality
Impact 9.1: Short-term construction and long-term operation of development under the Project
would generate pollutants that may enter stormwater. However, compliance with existing
regulations, as identified in RR 9-1 through RR 9-3, would prevent the violation of water quality
standards, ensure compliance with waste discharge requirements and prevent the degradation of
stormwater quality and groundwater quality. Impacts would be less than significant and no
mitigation is required.
Impact 9.2: The Project would result in net increase in water demand as compared to existing
conditions; however, the net increase would represent less than one percent of water demand for
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Therefore, the Project would not deplete groundwater
supplies. The Project site is not in an CVWD groundwater recharge area; therefore, implementation
of the Project would not interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant
and no mitigation is required.
Page 867
12
Impact 9.3: The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site, create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff, or impede or redirect flood flows. Impacts would be less than significant and no
mitigation is required.
Impact 9.4: The Project site is not within a 100-year flood zone, is not within a tsunami zone, and
is not within proximity to an enclosed or partially enclosed body of water that is capable of
producing seiches. Therefore, there would be no impact related to risk of release of pollutants due
to Project inundation from a flood, tsunami or seiche. The Project site is not located within a dam
inundation area and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation is not required.
Impact 9.5: The Project site is within the Santa Ana River Basin and with adherence to RR 9-1
through RR 9-3, the Project would not conflict with the Santa Ana Basin Plan. The Chino and
Cucamonga Groundwater Basins are “low priority” basins and not subject to the requirements of
the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an
adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan. No impacts would occur.
11.Land Use and Planning
Impact 10.1: The Project site is surrounded by existing non-residential development.
Redevelopment of the Project site, including construction of new Street A, would not physically
divide an established community. No impact would occur.
Impact 10.2: Implementation of the Project would not result in conflicts with any local or regional
land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect. The Project is consistent with the advisory Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
(2010) Policy LU-7.1 because following the preparation of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
(2010), the NRG Etiwanda Generating Station closed and there is no longer a need for the
immediately surrounding areas to be developed with heavy industrial uses. No impacts would
occur.
12.Mineral Resources
As identified in the NOP, the Project site is not located within an area known to be underlain by
regionally-important mineral resources and is not identified as a locally-important mineral resource
recovery site. Implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residents of the State of California.
No impact would result.
13.Noise
Impact 11.2: The Project would not result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels during construction or operation. This impact is less than significant
and no mitigation is required.
Page 868
13
Impact 11.3: The Project site is located within the ONT AIA but outside the 60 dBA CNEL airport
noise impact zone. The Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to
excessive noise levels. This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required.
14.Population and Housing
Impact 12.1: The Project proposes to redevelop the Project site with two warehouse buildings and
would not include the development of any residential uses. The Project would result in a net
increase of approximately 277 employment opportunities. The Project would not directly or
indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area. Impacts would be less than
significant.
Impact 12.2: The Project site does not contain any residential structures under existing conditions.
Therefore, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people and
would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur.
15.Public Services
As identified in the NOP, the Project would not involve new residential uses or an increase in the
City’s population, and there is an existing demand for public services at the Project site associated
with the existing development on-site. The Project would be developed in adherence to existing
regulations relative to fire protection, and required development impact fees would be paid. The
Project would not require the construction of new or alteration of existing public service facilities
to maintain an adequate level of service to the Project area, and no physical environmental impacts
would result. Impacts to public services would be less than significant.
16.Recreation
As identified in the NOP, the Project does not propose any uses that would directly generate a
population that would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities. In addition, the Project does not propose to construct any new on- or off-site
recreation facilities. Implementation of the Project would not result in the increased use or
substantial physical deterioration of an existing neighborhood or regional park, or substantial
adverse environmental effects related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
Impacts related to recreational facilities would be less than significant.
17.Transportation/Traffic
Impact 13.1: The Project site is within a Transit Priority Area, and the Project would be
implemented in accordance with applicable regulations related to Transportation (refer to RR 13-2
and RR 13-3). The Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing
the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. No impact
would result.
Impact 13.2: The Project’s VMT impact would be considered less than significant based on the
City’s Low VMT Area screening threshold. Further, the Project’s VMT impact would be
considered less than significant based on the comparison of baseline Project-generated VMT per
service population to the City’s baseline condition. Thus, the Project would not conflict with or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). This impact is less than
significant and no mitigation is required.
Page 869
14
Impact 13.3: Construction activities within the public right-of-way would be conducted in
accordance with requirements established by the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario (refer
to RR 13-1 and RR 13-5) and Caltrans as appropriate, and Project-generated truck traffic during
construction and operation would travel on designated truck routes, and would adhere to applicable
regulations associated with truck travel (refer to RR 13-4). The Project does not involve the
introduction of any design features or incompatible uses that would substantially increase hazards
for motorists, pedestrians, or bicyclists, on the roadways surrounding the Project site. This impact
would be less than significant.
Impact 13.4: Proposed construction activities would be conducted in compliance with
requirements of the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario (refer to RR 13-1 and RR 13-5), and
the Project circulation system would meet Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD)
standards for access, width, and turning radii. The Project would provide adequate emergency
access and impacts would be less than significant.
18.Tribal Cultural Resources
Impact 14.1.a: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resources that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k). No impact would occur.
19.Utilities and Service Systems
Impact 15.1: The Project would increase the demand for utility services and in addition to
complying with Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards and the CALGreen Code, the Project would
adhere to regulations addressing water conservation (refer to RR 15-2 and RR 15-3). Utility
infrastructure installation and associated improvements would occur within the identified physical
impact area for the Project (on-site and within the public right-of-way along adjacent streets) as
addressed throughout the Draft EIR, and in compliance with applicable requirements of the utility
providers (RR 15-1). No additional impacts would result. This impact would be less than significant
and no mitigation is required.
Impact 15.2: Development allowed by the Project would require water supplies from the CVWD.
The Project-specific Water Supply Assessment (WSA) demonstrates that CVWD has available
water supplies to meet the water demands of the Project for the next twenty years through 2040,
including demands during normal, single dry and multiple dry years. The CVWD has concurred
with the findings of the WSA that available water supplies would be adequate to serve the Project.
Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Impact 15.3: The Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) wastewater treatment facilities have
sufficient capacity to serve the Project and existing commitments. This impact would be less than
significant and no mitigation is required.
Impact 15.4: The Project’s construction and operational refuse would be disposed of at the Mid
Valley Landfill. Construction and operational activities would comply with applicable regulations
addressing solid waste management (refer to RR 15-4 and RR 15-5). The Project would not
generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. This impact would
be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Page 870
15
Impact 15.5: Construction and operation associated with implementation the Project would be
conducted in compliance with applicable statues and regulations related to solid waste. No impact
would occur and no mitigation is required.
20. Wildfire
As identified in the NOP, the Project site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone,
and is surrounded by development, with no wildland areas in the immediate vicinity. As such, no
impacts related to wildfire would occur.
C. FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTS DETERMINED TO BE
MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL
The EIR identified certain potentially significant effects that could result from the Project.
However, the City finds for each of the significant or potentially significant impacts identified in
this section that based upon substantial evidence in the record, changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR and, thus, that adoption of the mitigation
measures set forth below will reduce these significant or potentially significant effects to less-than-
significant levels. Adoption of the recommended mitigation measures will effectively make the
mitigation measures part of the Project. Impacts and Mitigation Measures are presented below in
summary form. For a detailed description of impacts and Mitigation Measures, see the appropriate
text in the EIR.
As stated in Part I of these Findings, above, the City hereby binds itself to implement these
measures as measures built into the design of the Project itself or as conditions of Project approval.
1. Air Quality
Threshold 2.1: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: The air quality plan applicable to the Project is the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The
Project’s net operational emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds
or LST thresholds, and the Project’s construction and operational characteristics would not exceed
the assumptions in the AQMP. However, prior to mitigation the Project’s construction-related
emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds for NOX. Thus, Project-related
construction activities have the potential to result in an increase in the frequency or severity of
existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment
of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the 2016 AQMP, resulting
in a potentially significant impact. With the implementation of MM 2-1, which was expanded in
the Final EIR to include additional construction-related mitigation requirements recommended by
the CARB the Project would not conflict with the 2016 AQMP, and this impact would be less than
significant. MM 2-1 reduces NOx emissions by requiring the use of Tier 3 and Tier 4 equipment,
restricting idling time for heavy construction equipment, requiring electrical hookups for zero near
Page 871
16
zero construction equipment and use of commercially available electric powered equipment, and
requiring use of Model Year 2014 or later heavy-duty trucks for dirt and material hauling.
To reduce the Project’s less than significant operational air quality impacts identified in the Draft
EIR, new MM 2-2 was also added in the Final EIR in response to CARB’s recommendations. MM
2-2 reduces NOx emissions through Project design requirements (EV-ready truck dock positions),
and operational requirements to be imposed on future building occupants related to transportation
refrigeration units (TRUs), use of service equipment powered by alternative fuels, and idling times
for trucks and support equipment.
MM 2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit issuance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
shall verify that the following applicable notes are included on the grading plans and
building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with these
notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction-site by City of Rancho
Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be
specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
•During construction activity, Project construction contractors shall ensure that
off-road diesel construction equipment complies with applicable California Air
Resources Board (CARB) emissions standards or equivalent and shall ensure that
all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer’s specifications.
•The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier III certified
or better, by construction phase as shown:
o Demolition/Crushing:
Boom Lift
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Crusher
Skid Steer
o Utilities/Infrastructure:
Trencher
o Building Construction:
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Welders
o Paving:
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers
o Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
•The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier IV Final
certified or better, by construction phase as shown:
o Demolition/Crushing:
Breakers
Excavators
Generator Sets
Rubber Tired Dozers
Page 872
17
o Grading:
Crawler Tractors
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
o Utilities/Infrastructure:
Excavators
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
o Building Construction
Cranes
Crawler Tractors
Laser Screed
Scissor Loaders/Backhoes
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
•Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to two minutes and
electrical hook ups shall be provided to support use of zero and near-zero
construction equipment and tools whenever feasible.
•Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate
compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction shall be electric
powered, provided that it is commercially available, which may be plug-in
(electric) or battery powered.
•Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material hauling during construction shall
meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency/California Air
Resource Board truck engine standard for Model Year 2014 or later.
MM 2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following operational requirements in the final
building design or stipulate the operational requirements for building occupants, as
appropriate:
Project Design
•Make truck dock positions EV-ready by installing conduits at truck dock
positions for future accommodation of light-duty and/or heavy-duty electric
trucks and charging stations.
Lease Agreement and Owner-Occupant Requirements
•Those loading docks used by trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU)
as determined by a cold storage tenant shall be equipped with electrical
hookups (applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only).
•TRUs entering the Project site shall be plug-in capable (applicable to cold
storage tenant lease agreements only).
•On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall be no longer than 15 minutes
(applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only).
•Service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet
jacks) shall be powered by alternative fuels, electrical batteries or other
Page 873
18
alternative/non-diesel fuels (e.g., propane) that do not emit diesel particulate
matter, and that are low or zero emission.
•Trucks and support equipment shall not idle longer than five minutes while on
site.
Threshold 2.2: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or
State ambient air quality standard?
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: Prior to mitigation and with adherence to applicable regulatory
requirements (RR-1 through RR-5), the Project’s construction activities would result in a
cumulatively-considerable net increase of NOX, which is an O3 precursor, for which the Project
region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard, resulting
in a potentially significant impact. As discussed above, this impact would be mitigated to a less
than significant level with implementation of MM 2-1, as revised in the Final EIR, which is
presented above because MM 2-1 includes requirements that serve to reduce NOx emissions.
During operation, the Project would not result in a cumulatively-considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or
State ambient air quality standard, and impacts would therefore be less than significant.
Notwithstanding the Project’s less than significant impact, new MM 2-2 presented above would
also be implemented to further reduce operational air pollutant emissions. As discussed above, MM
2-2 includes requirements that serve to reduce NOx emissions.
2.Cultural Resources
Threshold 4.2: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: The Project has a low potential to impact unknown archaeological
resources; however, there is a potential to encounter subsurface archaeological resources during
construction resulting in a potentially significant impact prior to mitigation. Implementation of MM
4-1 and MM 4-2, which identify actions to be taken during construction to protect unknown
resources, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. MM 4-1 requires that prior to
the commencement of grading, a qualified archaeologist be retained to conduct contractor training
so all personnel are aware of the potential for the presence of resources at the site and understand
the protocols to follow in the event of a discovery. In the unlikely event that archaeological
resources are unearthed, resulting in a potential loss of a previously unknown resource, MM 4-2
requires a qualified archaeologist must be retained to evaluate the find and make decisions on its
disposition.
MM 4-1 Prior to site preparation or grading activities, construction personnel shall be instructed
by a qualified Archaeologist of the potential for encountering unique archaeological
resources and instructed on steps to take in the event such resources are encountered.
This shall include the provision of written materials to familiarize personnel with the
Page 874
19
range of resources that might be expected, the type of activities that may result in
impacts, and the legal framework of cultural resources protection. All construction
personnel shall be instructed to stop work in the vicinity of a potential discovery until
a qualified Archaeologist assesses the significance of the find and implements
appropriate measures to protect or scientifically remove the find. Construction
personnel shall also be informed that unauthorized collection of archaeological
resources is prohibited.
MM 4-2 In the event that cultural resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation and
grading activities, the Contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities
within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery. The Property Owner/Developer shall
retain a qualified Archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), subject to approval by the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, to evaluate the significance of the find and to determine an
appropriate course of action. All artifacts except for human remains and related grave
goods or sacred objects belong to the Property Owner.
All artifacts discovered at the development site shall be inventoried and analyzed by
the Project Archaeologist. Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried,
assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership),
function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts
shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner, as deemed
appropriate.
If any artifacts of Native American origin are discovered, the Property
Owner/Developer and Project Archaeologist shall notify the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department and the appropriate local Native American tribe
identified by the Native American Heritage Commission. The significance of Native
American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and
shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the tribe (refer to MM
14-1 though MM 14-6 in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural Resources). All items found in
association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or
sacred in origin and subject to special handling (see RR 4-1).
Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines
that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be
discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Department.
A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts, shall be
prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. The report shall include a
discussion of the significance of all recovered artifacts. The report and inventory, when
submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, shall signify
completion of the program to mitigate impacts to archaeological and/or cultural
resources. A copy of the report shall also be filed with the Archaeological Information
Center (AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum and the Native American tribe,
as appropriate.
Page 875
20
3. Geology & Soils
Threshold 6.6: Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site is underlain by native alluvial soils, which have a
High paleontological sensitivity. The depth of proposed excavation for the Project is up to 26 feet.
Therefore, there is a potential for significant paleontological resources to be unearthed during
ground-disturbing activities, without mitigation. With the implementation of MM 6-1, which
identifies actions to be taken during construction to protect paleontological resources that may be
present, potential impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. MM 6-1
requires that full-time paleontological monitoring be required starting at a depth of 12 feet below
the surface during grading, excavation, or utility trenching activities at the Project site. For grading
and other earth disturbance activities at depths between five and 12 feet below the surface, periodic
“spot checks” for potential paleontological resources is warranted and also required by MM 6-1. If
significant fossils are discovered during a spot check, full-time monitoring is required. MM 6-1
further identifies steps to be taken in the event paleontological resources are encountered, including
temporary halting construction activities or diverting equipment to allow for the removal of fossils
in a timely manner; depositing fossils in an accredit institution, if warranted; and, preparation of a
final monitoring and mitigation report.
MM 6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall submit to and
receive approval from the City, a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation
Monitoring Program (PRIMMP). The PRIMMP shall include the provision of a
qualified professional paleontologist (or his or her trained paleontological monitor
representative) during on-site subsurface excavation of Quaternary (i.e., early
Holocene and late Pleistocene) alluvial-fan deposits, as outlined below. Selection of
the paleontologist shall be subject to approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Director, or designee, and no grading activities shall occur at the site until the
paleontologist has been approved by the City. The PRIMMP shall include the
requirements below.
• Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities in areas identified as likely
to contain paleontological resources shall be performed by a qualified
paleontologist or paleontological monitor. Monitoring shall be conducted full time
in areas of grading or excavation activities that occur in undisturbed exposures of
Quaternary (i.e., early Holocene and late Pleistocene) alluvial-fan deposits at a
depth of 12 feet and below in order to mitigate any adverse impacts (loss or
destruction) to potential nonrenewable paleontological resources. For grading and
other earth disturbance activities at depths between 5 and 12 feet below the surface,
periodic spot checks for potential paleontological resources shall be conducted.
Periodic monitoring shall consist of approximately 1 to 3 scheduled site visits per
week by a paleontological monitor during construction ground disturbance. If
significant fossils are discovered during a spot check, full-time monitoring should
be initiated.
• Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed
to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediment that are likely to
Page 876
21
contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall
be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow for the removal of
abundant or large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the
potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or if they are
present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified
paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources.
• Recovered specimens shall be prepared to a point of identification and permanent
preservation, including screen-washing sediments to recover small invertebrates
and vertebrates, if indicated by the results of test sampling. Preparation of
individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-consuming than for accumulations
of invertebrate fossils.
• All fossils shall be deposited in an accredited institution, such as the San
Bernardino County Museum, that maintains collections of paleontological
materials. All costs of the paleontological monitoring and mitigation program,
including any one-time charges by the receiving institution, are the responsibility
of the Project Applicant.
• The Project Paleontologist shall prepare of a final monitoring and mitigation report
of findings and significance, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary
maps and graphics to accurately record their original location(s). A letter
documenting receipt and acceptance of all fossil collections by the receiving
institution must be included in the final report. The report, when submitted to (and
accepted by) the City of Rancho Cucamonga, shall signify satisfactory completion
of the Project program to mitigate impacts to any nonrenewable paleontological
resources.
4. Noise
Threshold 11.1: Would the Project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: During the Project’s construction phase, the Project would result
in a temporary increase in noise levels along the eastern property boundary, which is shared with
the West Valley Detention Center. The construction noise levels would exceed the City of Rancho
Cucamonga construction noise level standard of 65 dBA Leq. With implementation of MM 11-1
and MM 11-2, construction-related noise impacts at the eastern property boundary would be
reduced 62.1 dBA Leq, which would not exceed the City’s standard, resulting in a less than
significant impact with mitigation. MM 11-2 requires installation of a temporary noise barrier at
the eastern property line during construction, and MM 11-2 requires use of properly operating and
maintained mufflers and directing stationary construction equipment away noise sensitive
receivers.
Page 877
22
The Project would not result in a permanent increase in daytime or nighttime noise levels during
operation in excess of established noise standards. This impact is less than significant, and no
mitigation is required.
MM 11-1 Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall
review the plans to ensure the plans require the installation of a minimum 6-foot-high
temporary construction perimeter noise barrier along the Project site’s boundary with
the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center. The location and following
specifications for the noise control barrier shall also be included on the plans:
•The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom.
•The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of the following materials with no
decorative cutouts or line-of-sight openings between shielded areas and the noise
source:
o An acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic curtains, quilted blankets, or
equivalent) attached to the construction-site perimeter fence or equivalent
temporary fence posts.
o Any combination of construction materials satisfying a weight of at least 4
pounds per square foot of face area.
•The noise barriers shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps,
holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground
shall be promptly repaired.
The required barrier shall be installed prior to any construction activities commencing
on-site and shall remain in place until construction activities have been completed.
The construction contractor shall allow for periodic inspection by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to ensure that the required noise barrier remains in place until completion
of construction activities on-site.
MM 11-2 During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all
construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained
mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. The construction contractor shall
place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from
the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. The construction contractor shall
allow for periodic inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure compliance
with these requirements.
5.Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold 14.1.b: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native American tribe.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings: The Project has a low potential to impact unknown tribal cultural
resources; however, there is a potential to encounter subsurface tribal cultural resources during
Page 878
23
construction resulting in a potentially significant impact prior to mitigation. Implementation of MM
14-1 through MM 14-6, required during the City’s consultation with the Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. MM 14-1
through MM 14-6 require monitoring of ground-disturbing activities, outline the parameters for the
monitoring activities, and identify actions that should be taken if tribal cultural resources or Native
American human remains are encountered. These measures further ensure the proper identification
and subsequent treatment of any tribal cultural resources and/or Native American human remains
that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with the development of
the Project. If human remains are encountered in subsurface soils, implementation of RR 4-1, which
outlines state-required actions required to be taken in the event human remains of Native American
origin are discovered, would also ensure potential impacts are less than significant.
MM 14-1 Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the
project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleño
Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation – the tribe that consulted on this project pursuant
to Assembly Bill A52 - SB18 (the “Tribe” or the “Consulting Tribe”). A copy of the
executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to the
issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal
monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve
ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as
activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or
auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching,
within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that
shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities,
locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end
when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project site are completed, or when the
Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-
disturbing activities at the Project site have little to no potential for impacting tribal
cultural resources. Upon discovery of any tribal cultural resources, construction
activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding
50 feet) until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by project
activities shall be evaluated by the Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe
and a qualified archaeologist if one is present. If the resources are Native American in
origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe
deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains
and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site, all ground
disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per
Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5.
Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public
Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue in other parts of
the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred
manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include
implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource
along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological
material that is not Native American in origin (non-TCR) shall be curated at a public,
non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution
agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it
shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational
purposes.
Page 879
24
MM 14-2 Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation
or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary
objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according
to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human
skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation
halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner
recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe
that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within
24 hours, the NAHC and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.
MM 14-3 Upon discovery of human remains, the tribal and/or archaeological
monitor/consultant/consultant shall immediately divert work at minimum of 100 feet
and place an exclusion zone around the discovery location. The monitor/consultant(s)
shall then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction
manager who shall call the coroner. Work shall continue to be diverted while the
coroner determines whether the remains are human and subsequently Native
American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further
disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner shall notify
the NAHC as mandated by state law who shall then appoint a Most Likely Descendent
(MLD).
MM 14-4 If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the Koo-
nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains”
encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal
Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the
burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human
remains. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as
bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part
of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed
with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made
exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as
associated funerary objects.
MM 14-5 Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the landowner shall arrange a
designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of
the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human
remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains shall
be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment
placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is
not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe
shall make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in
situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials
shall be removed. The Tribe shall work closely with the qualified archaeologist to
ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data
recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a
minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation
shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations shall either be
removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all
material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location
is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete,
a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe
Page 880
25
does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or
destructive diagnostics on human remains.
Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be stored
using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and
objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure container on-site if possible.
These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of
reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between
the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no
publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.
MM 14-6 Native American and Archaeological monitoring during construction projects shall be
consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any
unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of TCR’s shall be taken.
The Native American monitor must be approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission
Indians-Kizh Nation. Principal personnel for Archaeology must meet the Secretary of
Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a
principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern
California.
IV.FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES AND
GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
A. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion of any significant irreversible
environmental changes that would be caused by a proposed project. Specifically,
Section 15126.2(d) states:
Uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project may be
irreversible, since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or non-use thereafter
unlikely. Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts (such as highway improvement
which provides access to a previously inaccessible area) generally commit future generations to
similar uses. Also, irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents associated with
the project. Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current
consumption is justified.
Generally, a project would result in significant irreversible environmental changes if the following
occurs:
•The primary and secondary impacts would generally commit future generations to
similar uses;
•The project would involve a large commitment of nonrenewable resources;
•The project involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential
environmental accidents associated with the project; and
•The proposed consumption of resources is not justified (e.g., the project involves the
wasteful use of energy).
Determining whether the Project may result in significant irreversible effects requires a
determination of whether key non-renewable resources would be degraded or destroyed in such a
way that there would be little possibility of restoring them. The southern portion of the Project site
Page 881
26
is developed with industrial uses, associated facilities, and landscaping, and the northern portion of
the Project site consists of a surface parking area and vacant land (a former vineyard). The Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan anticipates that development within the Southeast Focus Area will
eventually support urban uses that would generate jobs and revenue. Thus, the Project would alter
the Project site by replacing the existing warehouse and retail buildings, which were originally
constructed in 1983, with two new contemporary high-cube industrial warehouse buildings. There
are no non-renewable resources present at the Project site; therefore, conversion of the land from
its current state to a high-cube industrial warehouse development would have no direct effect on
any such resources at the Project site.
Construction of the Project would require the commitment and reduction of nonrenewable and/or
slowly renewable resources, including petroleum fuels and natural gas (e.g., for construction,
vehicle operations) as well as lumber, sand/gravel, steel, copper, lead, and other metals (for use in
building and internal roadway construction and utility infrastructure). Construction of the Project
would not involve the use of large sums or sources of renewable energy. Additionally, the Project
is required by law to comply with federal, state, and local building requirements addressing energy
conservation, compliance with these requirements reduces a building operation’s energy volume
that is produced by fossil fuels.
Non-renewable natural resources that would be consumed over the operating life of the Project
could include fuels (e.g., petroleum) for both on-site workers who would commute to the Project
site and for the vehicles that would deliver goods to/from the Project site. Depending on the specific
occupants of the Project’s future buildings, various non-renewable natural resources could be
consumed during operations, including metals (such as lead, copper, etc.). There also could be a
variety of ancillary maintenance and fueling activities for equipment used inside the future
buildings and in the truck loading areas of the industrial buildings. These activities could involve
the use of liquid fuels such as gasoline and diesel, propane, or other gases. The consumption of
non-renewable resources to construct and operate the Project over the long-term would likely
commit subsequent generations to the same use of the land and similar patterns of energy
consumption, although the Project is expected to generate a significant amount of solar energy
through a commitment to construct a rooftop solar system under the proposed Development
Agreement. It is improbable that the site would revert to permanently undeveloped conditions due
to the large capital investment that would already have been committed. However, the Project is
not expected to reduce the availability of any natural resources as a result of long-term operational
activities.
An analysis of the Project’s potential to transport or handle hazardous materials which, if released
into the environment, could result in irreversible damage to the environment is provided in the EIR.
As concluded in the analysis, compliance with federal, State, and local regulations related to
hazardous materials would be required of all contractors working on the property during the
Project’s construction and of all occupants that occupy the Project’s buildings. As such,
construction and long-term operation of the Project would not have the potential to cause significant
irreversible damage to the environment, including damage that may result from upset or accident
conditions.
Lastly, an increased commitment of public services (e.g., police and fire) would also be required.
However, as discussed above, the Project would not require the construction of new or alteration
of existing fire or police protection facilities to maintain an adequate level of service to the Project
area, and no physical environmental impacts would result.
Page 882
27
In summary, Project development is an irreversible commitment of the land, energy resources, and
public services.
B.GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
CEQA requires an EIR include a discussion of ways in which the proposed project could induce
growth. The CEQA Guidelines identify a project as growth-inducing if it fosters economic or
population growth or if it encourages the construction of additional housing either directly or
indirectly in the surrounding environment (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.2[e]). New
employees from the future high-cube warehouse uses proposed by the Project represent direct forms
of growth. These direct forms of growth have a secondary effect of expanding the size of local
markets and inducing additional economic activity in the area, placing additional demands on
public services and infrastructure systems, and in the generation of a variety of environmental
impacts.
To address this issue, potential growth-inducing effects are examined through analysis of the
following questions:
1.Would this project remove obstacles to growth (e.g., through the construction or extension of
major infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the project area or through changes
in existing regulations pertaining to land development)?
2.Would this project result in the need to expand one or more public services to maintain desired
levels of service?
3.Would this project encourage or facilitate economic effects that could result in other activities
that could significantly affect the environment?
4. Would approval of this project involve some precedent setting action that could encourage and
facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment?
A project could indirectly induce growth by reducing or removing barriers to growth or by creating
a condition that attracts additional population or new economic activity. However, a project’s
potential to induce growth does not automatically result in growth. Growth can only happen through
capital investment in new economic opportunities by the private or public sectors. Under CEQA,
growth inducement is not considered necessarily detrimental, beneficial, or of little significance to
the environment. This issue is presented to provide additional information on ways in which the
Project could contribute to significant changes in the environment, beyond the direct consequences
of implementing the Project examined in the EIR.
1.Would this Project remove obstacles to growth (e.g., through the construction or
extension of major infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the Project area
or through changes in existing regulations pertaining to land development)? Urban
development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and existing development in the Southeast
Focus Area, described in Section III.A, are already served by an extensive network of
utility/service systems and the other infrastructure necessary to accommodate or serve the
existing conditions and planned growth. The existing utility/service systems can be readily
upgraded and/or extended onto the future development sites. Further, future development
would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis prior to the time of proposed construction in
order to determine the utility/service systems necessary to serve the proposed land uses. The
Project would not involve the construction of any off-site infrastructure; existing and planned
Page 883
28
utility infrastructure and facilities are available adjacent to the Project site. New utility
infrastructure would be required to serve the proposed development and would connect to
existing utilities. The utility infrastructure installed as part of the Project would be sized and
located expressly to serve the Project and would not, therefore, induce growth in the Project
vicinity.
The Project would not involve the construction of any major roadways. A new public street
referred to as “Street A” would be constructed along the eastern boundary of the Project site to
provide a connection between 4th Street and 6th Street to alleviate vehicular trips on nearby
streets. Additionally, as shown in the General Plan Circulation Plan, the Project includes the
connection of 6th Street over the railroad tracks west of the Project site to complete 6th Street
between Santa Anita Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. These roadway improvements would not
induce growth in the Project vicinity.
As previously discussed, the Project site is currently designated for Light Industrial and Heavy
Industrial uses. The Project implements growth and development anticipated in the Southeast
Focus Area, as identified in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. However, a General Plan
Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are requested for the northern portion of the Project
site for consistency of land use designations across the Project site and to create a uniform set
of development standards to follow. The Project is not, therefore, considered to be growth-
inducing with respect to the removal of obstacles to growth.
2. Would this Project result in the need to expand one or more public services to maintain
desired levels of service? Consistent with the existing condition, the Project would create the
typical range of service calls for the RCFPD and SBSD that occur with the proposed industrial
uses. The Project would not necessitate the construction of new or the expansion of existing
public service facilities in order to maintain desired levels of service. No demand for other
public services (e.g., schools, parks, libraries) would occur with the Project and the facilities
or associated resources of these services do not need to be expanded. In addition, the City has
funding mechanisms in place through existing regulations and standard practices to
accommodate future growth and the demand for public services. This Project would not,
therefore, have significant growth inducing consequences with respect to public services.
3. Would this Project encourage or facilitate economic effects that could result in other
activities that could significantly affect the environment? During Project construction, a
number of designs, engineering, and construction-related jobs would be created. This would
last until Project construction is completed. This would be an indirect, growth-inducing effect
of the Project. As the Project is built and occupied, Project employees would seek shopping,
entertainment, employment, home improvement, auto maintenance, and other economic
opportunities in the surrounding area. This would represent an increased demand for such
economic goods and services and could, therefore, encourage the creation of new businesses
and/or the expansion of existing businesses that address these economic needs. However, it is
expected that any such development would occur consistent with planned growth identified in
the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the General Plans of nearby cities, including Ontario
and Fontana.
The Project is located near existing commercial and retail areas that would help serve the needs
of Project employees. However, the Project would not increase the residential population in the
City and would not directly induce or cause substantial unexpected growth in the area.
Page 884
29
Once operational, the Project could result in a net increase of approximately 277 employment
opportunities in the City, and the number of jobs that would result from operation of the Project
is within the growth projections for the City and region, including the growth assumptions in
SCAG’s current Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS;
referred to as Connect SoCal). It is expected that the short-term construction jobs and new
positions during Project operation would be filled by workers who already reside in the local
area or region. Operation of the Project is not anticipated to generate a substantial permanent
increase in population in the City, and the increase in demand for additional goods and services
would be limited to those associated with employee demands.
4.Would this Project involve some precedent setting action that could encourage and
facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment? The Project
involves a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to provide a consistent land
designation for the Project site. However, no changes to any of the City’s building safety
standards (i.e., building, grading, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire codes) are proposed or
required to implement this Project. Regulatory requirements and mitigation measures have
been identified to ensure that implementation of the Project complies with applicable City
plans, policies, and ordinances, ensure that there are no conflicts with adopted land
development regulations, and environmental impacts are minimized. The Project does not
propose any precedent-setting actions that, if approved, would specifically allow, or encourage
other projects and resultant growth to occur. Furthermore, the Project is not extending any
infrastructure or facilitating further development. Accordingly, the Project’s potential influence
on other nearby properties to redevelop at greater intensities and/or different uses than the
City’s General Plan and Zoning allow is speculative. CEQA does not require the analysis of
speculative effects (CEQA Guidelines Section 151454). If any other property owner were to
propose redevelopment of a property in the Project vicinity or in any part of the City, the
redevelopment project would require evaluation under CEQA based on its own merits,
including an analysis of direct and cumulatively considerable effects.
V. FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
Although the Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts, CEQA requires
evaluations of alternatives that can reduce the significance of identified Project impacts that will
not be avoided or substantially lessened by mitigation measures and can "feasibly attain most of
the basic objectives of the proposed Project." Thus, overall Project objectives were considered by
the City in evaluating the alternatives.
The objectives that have been established for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project are listed
below.
1.Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable goals
and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan.
2.Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased
property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City’s ongoing
municipal operations.
3.Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for operational
Page 885
30
design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are economically competitive
with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region.
4. Create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the need
for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment, and to
improve the jobs to housing balance.
5. Develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that complement
other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with other nearby
land uses.
6. Maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established
industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid or
shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways, and avoid locating industrial warehouse buildings
in close proximity to residential uses.
7. Develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and utilities to
be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network.
The following findings and brief explanation of the rationale for the findings regarding Project
alternatives identified in the EIR are set forth to comply with the requirements of Section
15091(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
The consideration of alternatives is an integral component of the CEQA process. The selection and
evaluation of a reasonable range of alternatives provides the public and decision-makers with
information on ways to avoid or lessen environmental impacts created by a proposed project. When
selecting alternatives for evaluation, CEQA requires alternatives that meet most of the basic
objectives of the Project, while avoiding or substantially lessening the Project’s significant and
unavoidable impacts. As noted above, the Project would not result in any significant and
unavoidable impacts.
Four alternatives to the Project were defined and analyzed.
No Project/No Action Alternative
Section 15126.6(e) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR evaluate a “no project” alternative
to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving a project with the impacts of not
approving that project. Section 15126.6(e)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines describes the two general
types of no project alternative: (1) when the project is the revision of an existing land use or
regulatory plan, policy, or ongoing operation, the no project alternative would be the continuation
of that plan; and (2) when the project is other than a land use/regulatory plan (such as a specific
development on an identifiable property), the no project alternative is the circumstance under which
the project does not proceed.
Under the No Project/No Action Alternative, the existing warehouse building, retail building, and
associated facilities on the Project site would be retained, but they would not be reoccupied and
would remain vacant with no associated operations. As described previously, the Project site is
currently occupied by a former Big Lots warehouse building and retail building which is currently
vacant. The Project site includes 23,240- sf retail building and a 1,431,000-sf warehouse building.
The No Project/No Action represents both types of no project alternatives outlined in the CEQA
Guidelines: (1) continuation of development consistent with the existing land use and zoning
Page 886
31
designations, and (2) assumes the Project does not proceed (leaving the existing warehouse building
and retail building on-site).
Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts
The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the No
Project/No Action Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and unavoidable
impact. The No Project/No Action Alternative would avoid the Project’s less than significant
impacts; however, it also has potential for negative effects associated with urban blight and safety
and security issues.
Findings Regarding Project Objectives
The No Project/No Action Alternative would not meet the Project objectives, would not realize any
of the Project’s design benefits associated with new development and would not meet current City
design standards.
No Project/No Development Alternative– Reuse of Existing Buildings
The Project site is currently occupied by a 1,431,000- sf former Big Lots warehouse building and
a 23,240- sf for Big Lots retail building. Big Lots vacated the Project site in February 2020, and
the Project site was reoccupied by Geodis from October 2020 to May 2021. Although the buildings
are currently vacant, uses that are consistent with the City’s zoning and adhere to applicable
regulations could reoccupy the buildings. Under No Project/No Development – Reuse of Existing
Buildings Alternative (No Project/No Development Alternative), the existing warehouse building,
retail building, and associated facilities on the Project site would be retained and reoccupied for use
consistent with that allowed by right pursuant to Section 17.30, Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning
District, of the City’s Development Code. This includes, but is not limited to, ongoing warehouse
and retail uses. It is expected that, depending on the type of use that would occupy the existing
buildings, tenant improvements could be needed to accommodate reuse of the buildings; however,
these improvements would not require approval of discretionary actions. With respect to roadway
and utility infrastructure, this Alternatives analysis assumes that existing circulation patterns would
be maintained, and existing utility infrastructure would continue to serve the site. This alternative
would not involve implementation of the roadway and infrastructure improvements proposed as
part of the Project, including construction of a public roadway that would be implemented with the
Project (Street A), and construction of an at-grade crossing of 6th Street at the railroad tracks.
The No Project/No Development Alternative represents both types of no project alternatives
outlined in Section 15126.6(e)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, discussed previously: (1) continuation
of development consistent with the existing land use and zoning designations, and (2) assumes the
Project does not proceed (leaving the existing warehouse building and retail building on-site).
Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts
The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the No
Project/No Development Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and
unavoidable impact. Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant
impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical issues: air quality (due
to construction-related emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter previously
undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter previously
undiscovered paleontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal
Page 887
32
cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These
potentially significant impacts are associated with construction activities, not operation of the
Project and therefore would not apply to the No Project/No Development Alternative.
As described above, the No Project/No Development Alternative would have a similar lack of
impacts, or less than significant impacts, as the Project related to aesthetics, biological resources,
geology and soils (related to seismic ground shaking and soil conditions), hazards and hazardous
materials, hydrology/drainage and groundwater, land use and planning, operational noise,
population and housing, transportation, and utilities and service systems. Therefore, the No
Project/No Development Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen Project impact related
to these issues.
The Project and No Project/No Development Alternative would also have less than significant
impacts for the following topics; however, the No Project/No Development Alternative would have
less impacts: construction-related air quality emissions, biological resources, cultural resources,
GHG emissions, geology and soils (related to paleontological resources), and tribal cultural
resources. Notably, the No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid potentially significant
impacts related to cultural resources, paleontological resources, and tribal cultural resources that
require Project-level mitigation to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
The Project and No Project/No Development Alternative would have less than significant impacts
for the following topics; however, the No Project/No Development Alternative would have
potentially greater impacts: energy conservation; conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs; and water quality impacts
during operations.
Findings Regarding Project Objectives
The discussion below addresses the ability of the No Project/No Development Alternative to attain
the Project objectives.
1.Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable
goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan. The No Project/No Development Alternative would not involve
redevelopment of the Project site, rather it would involve the reuse of existing buildings and
facilities at the Project site for continued warehouse and retail uses. Additionally, the No
Project/No Development Alternative would not further achievement of planning objectives
outlined in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Therefore, while the No Project/No
Development Alternative meets the intent of this Project objective, it does not meet it to the
same extent as the Project.
2.Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased
property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City’s
ongoing municipal operations. The No Project/No Development Alternative would involve
reuse of the existing buildings and would not maximize redevelopment of the underutilized
Project site. While the No Project/No Development Alternative would generate revenue
consistent with previous use of the site, it would not generate increased revenues. Therefore,
the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet this objective.
Page 888
33
3.Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for
operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are
economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region.
The reuse of the existing buildings on-site, which involves operation of a retail building, and
leaving the northern portion of the Project site undeveloped, would not meet this Project
objective, which is associated with maximizing development of the Project site through
redevelopment and the operation of contemporary high cube warehouse industrial buildings.
4.To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce
the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment,
and to improve the jobs to housing balance. The Project would generate more employment
opportunities than what would be generated through reuse of the existing buildings. Therefore,
the No Project/No Development Alternative would not achieve this objective to the same extent
as the Project.
5.To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that
complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with
other nearby land uses. Retention of the existing buildings under the No Project/No
Development Alternative would not conflict with existing architecture or the operations of
nearby uses and would achieve this objective.
6.To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established
industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid
or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways, and avoid locating industrial warehouse
buildings in close proximity to residential uses. The reuse of the existing buildings on-site,
which involves operation of a retail building, and leaving the northern portion of the Project
site undeveloped, would not maximize the amount of available industrial warehouse uses, and
would not meet this Project objective.
7.To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and
utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement
network. The No Project/No Development Alternative would involve the use of existing
buildings and facilities at the Project site for continued warehouse and retail uses. Although
existing uses under the No Project/No Development Alternative would continue to operate with
service from existing roadways and infrastructure, due to the reduction in warehouse uses, and
lack of contemporary buildings, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet
the intent of this objective to the same extent as the Project relative to supporting goods
movement in Southern California.
Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative
Under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, the existing 1,431,000 sf
warehouse building would be retained and operated as a warehouse, and the underutilized northern
portion of the Project site would be developed with 530 new trailer parking stalls. The existing
warehouse would be modified to include up to 54 additional loading dock doors. Additionally, it is
also expected that internal improvements to the existing building would be needed to accommodate
a tenant. Truck trailer parking would continue to be provided east of the warehouse building. The
existing retail building and landscaping in the southern portion of the Project site would be removed
and this area would be developed with surface parking (495 parking stalls with a combination of
existing and new parking stalls). New landscaping would be installed on-site. This Alternative
Page 889
34
would require installation of a retaining wall between the existing warehouse building in the
southern portion of the Project site and new truck trailer parking area in the northern portion of the
Project site. Existing circulation patterns would be maintained, and existing utility infrastructure
would continue to serve the site. As with the Project, this Alternative would include replacement
of existing sidewalks on 4th Street and 6th, and implementation of on-street bikeways along these
roadways. In addition to the new truck trailer parking in the northern portion of the Project site, this
Alternative would involve construction of the northern portion of Street A, which would terminate
with a cul-de-sac before extending into the southern portion of the Project site, and retention of the
existing rail spur. Should redevelopment of the southern portion of the Project site be considered
in the future, extension of Street A to 4th Street could be completed. Additionally, this Alternative
does not involve the construction of an at-grade crossing of 6th Street at the railroad tracks.
For purposes of analysis, it is anticipated that operations under this Alternative could also occur 24
hours per day/7 days per week, consistent with the Project. This Alternative would generate less
PM peak hour trips and average daily trips (ADT) compared to reuse of the existing buildings (with
no modifications), and a slight increase in AM peak hour trips. Additionally, due to the overall
reduction in building intensity, this Alternative would generate less vehicle trips compared to the
Project. The Project would result in a net increase of 176 actual AM peak hour trips, 104 actual PM
peak hour trips, and 976 ADT. When considering passenger car equivalent (PCE) trip generation,
the Project would result in a net increase of 189 actual AM peak hour trips, 110 actual PM peak
hour trips, and 1,278 ADT.
The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would be consistent with the existing
land use and zoning designations for the Project site, and associated development standards.
Therefore, a General Plan amendment, and Zoning Map amendment would not be required. Further,
it is not anticipated that the Project Applicant would enter into a Development Agreement with the
City. This Alternative would require a site plan and architectural review, a Tentative Parcel Map,
and a tree removal permit.
Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts
The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the Existing
Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant
and unavoidable impact. Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially
significant impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical issues: air
quality (due to construction-related emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter
undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter
paleontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources
(due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These potentially
significant impacts are associated with construction activities, not operation of the Project.
As described above, the Project and the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative
would be required to comply with applicable regulations and would also implement the same
mitigation measures required for the Project. Therefore, this Alternative would have a similar lack
of impacts, or less than significant impacts, for each topical issue. However, due to the reduction
in construction activities and overall building space, the Existing Warehouse and Additional
Parking Alternative would have reduced impacts associated with air pollutant emissions, GHG
emissions, noise, and utilities and services systems.
Page 890
35
Findings Regarding Project Objectives
The discussion below addresses the ability of the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking
Alternative to attain the Project objectives.
1.Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable
goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative
would not conflict with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set
forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and therefore would meet this objective.
2.Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased
property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City’s
ongoing municipal operations. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative
would involve reuse of the existing warehouse building on-site and construction of a surface
parking area for truck trailer parking in the northern portion of the site. While this Alternative
would generate increased property tax revenue compared to existing conditions, it would not
maximize redevelopment of the underutilized site. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and
Additional Parking Alternative would not meet this objective.
3.Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for
operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are
economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region.
The reuse of the existing warehouse building and addition of trailer dock doors and additional
parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not meet this
Project objective, which is associated with the operation of contemporary high cube warehouse
buildings, and maximizing development on-site. Redevelopment of the Project is necessary to
accomplish this objective.
4.To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce
the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment,
and to improve the jobs to housing balance. The Project would generate more employment
opportunities than what would be generated through reuse of the existing building with
additional parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, due to
the greater amount of building area proposed by the Project. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse
and Additional Parking Alternative would meet the objective but not to the same extent as the
Project as it would not generate additional new jobs.
5.To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that
complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with
other nearby land uses. Retention of the existing use/building under the Existing Warehouse
and Additional Parking Alternative would not conflict with existing architecture or the
operations of nearby uses. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking
Alternative would meet this objective.
6.To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established
industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid
or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways, and avoid locating industrial warehouse
buildings in close proximity to residential uses. The reuse of the existing warehouse building
and addition of surface parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking
Page 891
36
Alternative would not maximize the amount of available industrial warehouse uses, and would
not meet this Project objective.
7. To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and
utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement
network. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would involve the use
of the existing warehouse building and addition of parking for continued warehouse uses.
Although the existing warehouse building would continue to operate with service from existing
roadways and infrastructure, due to the reduction in warehouse space, and lack of contemporary
buildings, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not meet the
intent of this objective to the same extent as the Project relative to supporting goods movement
in Southern California.
Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative
Under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative, the existing 1,431,000 sf
warehouse building on the Project site would be retained and would operate as a high-cube
warehouse, the existing retail building would be removed, and the underutilized northern portion
of the Project site would be developed with a new 713,200 sf high-cube warehouse building and
associated parking and facilities. Collectively with the existing warehouse and additional
warehouse, this Alternative would have 2,144,200 sf of building area, compared to 2,175,000 sf
with the Project, a reduction of 30,800 sf.
Similar to the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, the existing warehouse
would be modified to include up to 54 additional loading dock doors and additional truck trailer
parking would be provided east of the existing building. A retaining wall would be installed along
the northeastern portion of this truck trailer parking area. It is also anticipated that internal
improvements to the existing building would be needed to accommodate a tenant. In addition to
removal of the retail building in the southern portion of the Project site, existing landscaping in this
area would be removed to accommodate additional surface parking (495 parking stalls consisting
of a combination of existing and new parking stalls).
The new 713,200 sf high-cube warehouse building in the northern portion of the Project site would
include an 8,000- sf mezzanine area, and up to 16,000 sf of office space. There would be 88 dock
doors and 89 trailer stalls on the north and south sides of the building, and automobile parking (258
stalls) would be provided near potential office areas. Approximately 100,000 sf of new landscaping
would be installed around the building. This Alternative would require installation of a retaining
wall between the existing and proposed buildings.
With respect to circulation and utility infrastructure improvements, existing circulation patterns
would be maintained, and existing utility infrastructure would continue to serve the site. Similar to
the Project, this Alternative would include replacement of existing sidewalks on 4th Street and 6th
Street, and implementation of on-street bikeways along these roadways. Short- and long-term
bicycle parking would be provided for both buildings. The existing rail spur on-site (south of 6th
Street) would be retained. This Alternative would also include construction of the northern portion
of Street A, which would terminate with a cul-de-sac before extending into the southern portion of
the Project site, and retention of the existing rail spur. Should redevelopment of the southern portion
of the Project site be considered in the future, extension of Street A to 4th Street could be completed.
This Alternative does include the construction of an at-grade crossing of 6th Street at the railroad
tracks, as proposed with the Project.
Page 892
37
For purposes of analysis, it is anticipated that operations under this Alternative could also occur 24
hours per day/7 days per week, consistent with the Project. This Alternative would increase peak
hour and ADT compared to reuse of the existing buildings (with no modifications). Additionally,
due to the overall reduction in building intensity, this Alternative would generate slightly less
vehicle trips compared to the Project. The Project would result in a net increase of 176 actual AM
peak hour trips, 104 actual PM peak hour trips, and 976 ADT. When considering passenger car
equivalent (PCE) trip generation, the Project would result in a net increase of 189 actual AM peak
hour trips, 110 actual PM peak hour trips, and 1,278 ADT.
The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would involve uses allowed by the
existing land use and zoning designations for the Project site. However, as with the Project, a
General Plan amendment and Zoning Map amendment would be required for the northern portion
of the Project site, changing the designation from Heavy Industrial to General Industrial. This
Alternative would also require site plan and architectural review, a Tentative Parcel Map, and a
tree removal permit. It is also anticipated that the Project Applicant would enter into a Development
Agreement with the City.
Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts
The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the Existing
Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a
significant and unavoidable impact. Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce
potentially significant impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical
issues: air quality (due to construction-related emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential
to encounter undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter
paleontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources
(due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These potentially
significant impacts are associated with construction activities, not operation of the Project.
Both the Project and the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would be
required to comply with applicable regulations and would also implement the same mitigation
measures required for the Project. Therefore, this Alternative would have a similar lack of impacts,
or less than significant impacts for each topical issue. However, due to the reduction in construction
activities due to the reuse of the existing warehouse building, and slight reduction in overall
building space, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would have reduced
impacts associated with air pollutant emissions, GHG emissions, and noise.
Findings Regarding Project Objectives
The discussion below addresses the ability of the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse
Alternative to attain the Project objectives.
1. Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable
goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative
would not conflict with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set
forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and therefore would meet this Project objective.
2. Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased
property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City’s
ongoing municipal operations. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse
Page 893
38
Alternative would involve reuse of the existing warehouse building on-site and construction of
a new building in the underutilized northern portion of the site. Due to the similarity in overall
building space as the Project, and because this Alternative would also increase property tax
revenue, this Alternative would meet this Project objective.
3.Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for
operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are
economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region.
The reuse of the existing warehouse building and construction of a new building in the
underutilized northern portion of the Project site under the Existing Warehouse and Additional
Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective, but not to the same extent as the
Project. Modifications to the existing building would not meet contemporary industry standards
to the same extent as a new warehouse building.
4.To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce
the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment,
and to improve the jobs to housing balance. As with the Project, the Existing Warehouse
and Additional Warehouse Alternative would generate new employment opportunities and
would meet this Project objective, but not to the same extent as the Project.
5.To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that
complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with
other nearby land uses. Retention of the existing warehouse building and construction of a
new warehouse under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would
not conflict with existing architecture or the operations of nearby uses. Therefore, the Existing
Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective.
6.To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established
industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid
or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways, and avoid locating industrial warehouse
buildings in close proximity to residential uses. The Project site is within an established
industrial area near designated truck routes and the State highway system. The reuse of the
existing warehouse building and construction of a new building on the underutilized northern
portion of the Project site under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative
would meet this Project objective.
7.To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and
utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement
network. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would involve the
use of the existing warehouse building and construction of new warehouse building, and would
continue to operate with service from existing roadways and infrastructure. Additionally, the
buildings would be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement
network. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would
meet this Project objective.
Environmentally Superior Alternative
CEQA requires the identification of an environmentally superior alternative. As discussed above,
the No Project/No Development Alternative, which involves reuse of the existing building and
facilities on-site would result in greater operational impacts than the Project for certain
Page 894
39
environmental issues, less construction-related impacts, and no change from current conditions for
other environmental issues. However, Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines states that,
if the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, then the EIR shall also
identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives.
The Project would result in potentially significant impacts during construction for the following
topics, and Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce these potentially significant
impacts to levels considered less than significant: air quality (due to construction-related
emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered cultural resources),
geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter paleontological resources), noise (due to
construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter
undiscovered tribal cultural resources). For all other topics, the Project, which would be
implemented in compliance with applicable regulations, would result in no impact or a less than
significant impact. The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts;
therefore, no alternative is needed to reduce or avoid such impacts. Therefore, for purposes of this
discussion, for an alternative to be superior to the Project, it would need to reduce construction-
related impacts.
The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would be the environmentally
superior alternative to the Project due to the reduction in construction activities, and reductions in
overall building space. Specifically, this alternative would involve modifications to and reuse of
the existing warehouse building, and construction of a new parking area in the northern portion of
the Project site, rather than construction of two new industrial warehouse buildings. This
Alternative would generate approximately 884 fewer daily trips compared to the Project. The
Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would have reduced impacts associated
with air pollutant emissions, GHG emissions, noise, and utilities and services systems.
The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would meet some, but not all of the
Project objectives, or would not meet the Project objectives to the same extent as the Project. This
is primarily because the Project objectives are related to maximizing industrial development on the
Project site that is consistent with the City’s General Plan, and to constructing contemporary
buildings.
VI. FINDINGS REGARDING RECIRCULATION OF THE DRAFT EIR
The City Council adopts the following findings with respect to whether to recirculate the Draft EIR.
Under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, recirculation of an EIR is required when
“significant new information” is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of
the Draft EIR for public review but prior to certification of the Final EIR. The term “information”
can include changes in the project or environmental setting, as well as additional data or other
information. New information added to an EIR is not “significant” unless the EIR is changed in a
way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse
environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including
a feasible project alternative) that the project’s proponents have declined to implement. “Significant
new information” requiring recirculation includes, for example, a disclosure showing that:
(1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new
mitigation measure proposed to be implemented.
(2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless
mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance.
Page 895
40
(3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others
previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project,
but the project’s proponents decline to adopt it.
(4) The Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature
that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15088.5.)
Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or
amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. The above standard is “not
intend[ed] to promote endless rounds of revision and recirculation of EIRs.” (Laurel Heights
Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 1112, 1132.)
“Recirculation was intended to be an exception, rather than the general rule.” (Ibid.)
The City Council recognizes that the Final EIR contains minor additions to the Draft EIR in the
form of revised and new feasible mitigation measures to further reduce the Project’s less than
significant air pollutant and GHG emissions and additional information clarifying the prior tenants
and ongoing operations at the site.
CEQA case law emphasizes that “‘[t]he CEQA reporting process is not designed to freeze the
ultimate proposal in the precise mold of the initial project; indeed, new and unforeseen insights
may emerge during investigation, evoking revision of the original proposal.’” (Kings County Farm
Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 736-737; see also River Valley Preservation
Project v. Metropolitan Transit Development Bd. (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 154, 168, fn. 11.) “CEQA
compels an interactive process of assessment of environmental impacts and responsive project
modification which must be genuine. It must be open to the public, premised upon a full and
meaningful disclosure of the scope, purposes, and effect of a consistently described project, with
flexibility to respond to unforeseen insights that emerge from the process. In short, a project must
be open for public discussion and subject to agency modification during the CEQA process.”
(Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 33rd Dist. Agricultural Assn. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929,
936 (internal citations omitted).) Here, the changes made to the Draft EIR in the Final EIR are
exactly the kind of revisions that the case law recognizes as legitimate and proper without requiring
or necessitating recirculation.
The City Council finds that none of the revisions to the Draft EIR made by, or discussion included
in, the Final EIR involves “significant new information” triggering recirculation because the
changes do not result in any new significant environmental effects, substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects, or feasible mitigation or project alternatives
that the Project Applicant declines to adopt that would clearly lessen the environmental effects of
the project. Notably, based on recommendations from CARB MM 2-1 was expanded in the Draft
EIR and MM 2-2 was added to further reduce the Project’s construction-related and operational air
pollutant emission. Under such circumstances, the City Council hereby finds that recirculation of
the EIR is not required.
Page 896
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
1
BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST
Project File Name: Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Applicant: Bridge Industrial
Prepared by: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: September 2021
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
Air Quality
RR 2-1 During construction, the Contractor shall comply
with South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rules 402 and 403, to minimize short term
emissions of dust and particulates. SCAQMD Rule 402
requires that air pollutant emissions not be a nuisance off-
site. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be
controlled with the best available control measures so
that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in
the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission
source. The Contractor shall provide the City of Rancho
Cucamonga with a SCAQMD-approved Dust Control Plan
or other sufficient proof of compliance with Rule 403,
prior to grading permit issuance.
BO B/C
During plan
check and
construction
activities
A/C
Page 897
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
2
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
RR 2-2 Architectural coatings shall be selected so that the
volatile organic compound (VOC) content of the coatings
is compliant with SCAQMD Rule 1113. This requirement
shall be included as notes on the contractor specifications,
which shall be reviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Building and Safety Services Department prior to issuance
of a building permit.
BO A
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
C
RR 2-3 The Project Applicant and/or future tenants shall
comply with SCAQMD Rule 201 and Regulation II
(requiring a Permit to Construct prior to the installation of
any equipment that may cause air contaminants) as well
as Rule 203 (requiring a Permit to Operate prior to the use
of any equipment that may cause air contaminants).
These rules and regulation are required unless the
Project’s equipment or aspects are exempt under Rule
219, which identifies those equipment, processes, or
operations that do not require permits. The Project
Applicant shall provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga
with the SCAQMD-approved Permit to Construct and
Permit to Operate or other sufficient proof of compliance
with Rules 201 and 203, prior to occupancy permit
issuance.
BO A
Prior to issuance
of occupancy
permits
D
RR 2-4 Building occupants shall comply with Rule 2202,
which provides employers with a menu of options to
reduce mobile source emissions generated from
PD A Prior to issuance
of tenant D
Page 898
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
3
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
employee commutes, to comply with federal and State
CAA requirements. This Rule applies to any employer who
employs 250 or more employees on a full or part-time
basis at a worksite for a consecutive six-month period
calculated as a monthly average, unless otherwise
exempt. An employer subject to this Rule is required to
annually register with the SCAQMD to implement an
emission reduction program, in accordance with
subdivisions (f) and (g), that will obtain emission
reductions equivalent to a worksite specific emission
reduction target (ERT) specified for the compliance year.
improvement
permits
RR 2-5 The Project shall be operated in compliance with
established standards in Section 17.66.060, Odor,
Particulate Matter, and Air Containment Standards, of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. These
standards address compliance with the rules and
regulations of the air pollution control district and the
state Health and Safety Code related to odorous
emissions, particulate matter, and air containment;
noxious odor emissions; and restrictions on the emission
of dust and particulate matter.
BO A
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
C
MM 2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit
issuance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall verify that
the following applicable notes are included on the grading
plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be
BO B/C
Prior to issuance
of grading and
building
A/C
Page 899
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
4
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
required to ensure compliance with these notes and
permit periodic inspection of the construction-site by City
of Rancho Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm
compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid
documents issued to prospective construction
contractors.
•During construction activity, Project construction
contractors shall ensure that off-road diesel
construction equipment complies with applicable
California Air Resources Board (CARB) emissions
standards or equivalent and shall ensure that all
construction equipment is tuned and maintained
in accordance with the manufacturer’s
specifications.
•The following off-road construction equipment
shall be CARB Tier III certified or better, by
construction phase as shown:
o Demolition/Crushing:
Boom Lift
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Crusher
Skid Steer
o Utilities/Infrastructure:
Trencher
o Building Construction:
permits/during
construction
Page 900
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
5
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Welders
o Paving:
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers
o Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
• The following off-road construction equipment
shall be CARB Tier IV Final certified or better, by
construction phase as shown:
o Demolition/Crushing:
Breakers
Excavators
Generator Sets
Rubber Tired Dozers
o Grading:
Crawler Tractors
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
o Utilities/Infrastructure:
Excavators
Page 901
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
6
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
o Building Construction
Cranes
Crawler Tractors
Laser Screed
Scissor Loaders/Backhoes
Skip Loaders/Backhoes
• Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be
restricted to two minutes and electrical hook ups
shall be provided to support use of zero and near-
zero construction equipment and tools whenever
feasible.
• Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19
kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure
washers) used during project construction shall be
electric powered, provided that it is commercially
available, which may be plug-in (electric) or
battery powered.
• Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material
hauling during construction shall meet the United
States Environmental Protection
Agency/California Air Resource Board truck engine
standard for Model Year 2014 or later.
Page 902
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
7
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
MM 2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following
operational requirements in the final building design or
stipulate the operational requirements for building
occupants, as appropriate:
Project Design
• Make truck dock positions EV-ready by installing
conduits at truck dock positions for future
accommodation of light-duty and/or heavy-duty
electric trucks and charging stations.
Lease Agreement and Owner-Occupant Requirements
• Those loading docks used by trucks with transport
refrigeration units (TRU) as determined by a cold
storage tenant shall be equipped with electrical
hookups (applicable to cold storage tenant lease
agreements only).
• TRUs entering the Project site shall be plug-in
capable (applicable to cold storage tenant lease
agreements only).
• On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall be no
longer than 15 minutes (applicable to cold storage
tenant lease agreements only).
• Service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard
equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks) shall be
powered by alternative fuels, electrical batteries
BO A/D
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
Prior to issuance
of tenant
improvement
permits for all
project tenants
or occupants
C/D
Page 903
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
8
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
or other alternative/non-diesel fuels (e.g.,
propane) that do not emit diesel particulate
matter, and that are low or zero emission.
• Trucks and support equipment shall not idle
longer than five minutes while on site.
Biological Resources
RR 3-1 All construction activities shall comply with the
MBTA and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503,
3511 and 3513. The MBTA governs the taking and killing
of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests and
prohibits the take of any migratory bird, their eggs, parts,
and nests. Compliance with the MBTA and California Fish
and Game Code shall be accomplished by completing the
following:
• Construction activities involving vegetation
removal shall be conducted between September 1
and January 31. If construction occurs inside the
peak nesting season (between February 1 and
August 31), a pre-construction survey (or possibly
multiple surveys) by a qualified Biologist shall be
conducted within 72 hours prior to construction
activities to identify any active nesting locations. If
the Biologist does not find any active nests, the
construction work shall be allowed to proceed.
The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall
PD B/C
Prior to
construction/
during
construction
A/D
Page 904
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
9
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
document a negative survey with a report
indicating that no impacts to active avian nests
shall occur.
If the biologist finds an active nest on within the
pre-construction survey area and determines that
the nest may be impacted, the Biologist shall
delineate an appropriate buffer zone around the
nest. The size of the buffer shall be determined by
the Biologist, and shall be based on the nesting
species, its sensitivity to disturbance, expected
types of disturbance, and location in relation to
the construction activities. These buffers are
typically 300 feet from the nests of non-listed
species and 500 feet from the nests of raptors and
listed species. Any active nests observed during
the survey shall be mapped on an aerial
photograph. Only construction activities (if any)
that have been approved by a Biological Monitor
shall take place within the buffer zone until the
nest is vacated. The Biologist shall serve as a
Construction Monitor when construction activities
take place near active nest areas to ensure that no
inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. Results
of the pre-construction survey and any
Page 905
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
10
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the
Property Owner/Developer and the City. The
monitoring report shall summarize the results of
the nest monitoring, describe construction
restrictions currently in place, and confirm that
construction activities can proceed within the
buffer area without jeopardizing the survival of
the young birds.
RR 3-2 All construction activities shall comply with
Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511 and 3513 of the California
Fish and Game Code, which protect active nests of any
raptor species, including common raptor species.
Compliance with these codes shall be accomplished by
completing the following:
• If vegetation is to be cleared during the potential
raptor nesting season (December 1 to August 31),
all suitable habitat within 500 feet of the
construction impact area shall be thoroughly
surveyed for the presence of nesting raptors by a
qualified Biologist within 72 hours prior to
clearing. If the Biologist does not find any active
nests, the construction work shall be allowed to
proceed. The biologist conducting the clearance
survey shall document a negative survey with a
PD B/C
Prior to
construction/
during
construction
A/D
Page 906
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
11
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
report indicating that no impacts to active avian
nests shall occur.
If any active nests are detected, the area shall be
flagged and mapped on the construction plans
with a buffer. The size of the buffer shall be
determined by the Biologist and shall be based on
the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance,
expected types of disturbance, and location in
relation to the construction activities. These
buffers are typically 300 feet from the nest of non-
listed species and 500 feet from the nests of
raptors and listed species. The buffer area shall be
avoided until the nesting cycle is complete or until
it is determined that the nest has failed. Results of
the pre-construction survey and any subsequent
monitoring shall be provided to the Property
Owner/Developer and the City. The monitoring
report shall summarize the results of the nest
monitoring, describe construction restrictions
currently in place, and confirm that construction
activities can proceed within the buffer area
without jeopardizing the survival of the young
birds.
Page 907
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
12
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
Although presumed absent, prior to development
of the Project site, a pre-construction burrowing
owl clearance survey shall be conducted to ensure
burrowing owls remain absent from the
construction impact area. The clearance survey
shall be conducted in accordance with the CDFW
(2012) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation
which requires that two clearance surveys be
conducted 14 – 30 days and 24 hours prior to any
grading or vegetation removal on the Project site.
If burrowing owls are observed on the Project site
during the pre-construction surveys, a burrowing
owl relocation plan shall be prepared and
submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior
to commencement of vegetation clearing/
grubbing, grading, and construction activities on
the Project site. The burrowing owl relocation
plan shall outline methods to relocate any
burrowing owls occurring on the Project site and
ensure compliance with the MBTA and California
Fish and Game Code. If an active burrow is found
during the breeding season (February 1 through
August 31), occupied burrows will not be
disturbed and will be provided with a protective
buffer unless a qualified biologist verifies through
Page 908
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
13
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
noninvasive means that either: (1) the birds have
not begun egg laying, or (2) juveniles from the
occupied burrows are foraging independently and
are capable of independent survival. The size of
the buffer will depend on the time of year and
level disturbance as outlined in the CDFW Staff
Report.
RR 3-3 All tree replacement, protection, and maintenance
associated with implementation of the Project shall be
conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth
in Chapter 17.80 of the City’s Development Code.
PD A
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit/during
construction
A/C
RR 3-4 In compliance with the City’s Tree Removal Permit
process (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter
17.16.080), the Property Owner/Developer shall obtain a
Tree Removal Permit from the Planning Director prior to
removal, relocation, or destruction of any heritage tree.
Conditions imposed by the Planning Director for
replacement of removed trees or tree relocation shall be
completed by the Property Owner/Developer.
PD B Prior to tree
removal D
Cultural Resources
RR 4-1 If human remains are encountered during the
conduct of ground-disturbing activities, Section 7050.5 of
the California Health and Safety Code states that no
further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner
has made a determination of origin and disposition of the
PD/BO C
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit/during
grading and
construction
C/D
Page 909
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
14
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
materials pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California
Public Resources Code. The provisions of Section 15064.5
of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
shall also be followed. The County Coroner must be
notified of the find immediately. If the remains are
determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner shall notify the
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC
will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent
(MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her
authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site
of the discovery. The descendent must complete the
inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC.
The MLD may recommend scientific removal and
nondestructive analysis of human remains and items
associated with Native American burials. These
requirements shall be included as notes on the contractor
specification and verified by the Community Development
Department, prior to issuance of grading permits.
MM 4-1 Prior to site preparation or grading activities,
construction personnel shall be instructed by a qualified
Archaeologist of the potential for encountering unique
archaeological resources and instructed on steps to take
in the event such resources are encountered. This shall
include the provision of written materials to familiarize
personnel with the range of resources that might be
PD B
Prior to the start
of demolition,
site clearing or
grading
A/D
Page 910
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
15
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
expected, the type of activities that may result in impacts,
and the legal framework of cultural resources protection.
All construction personnel shall be instructed to stop work
in the vicinity of a potential discovery until a qualified
Archaeologist assesses the significance of the find and
implements appropriate measures to protect or
scientifically remove the find. Construction personnel shall
also be informed that unauthorized collection of
archaeological resources is prohibited.
MM 4-2 In the event that cultural resources are
inadvertently unearthed during excavation and grading
activities, the Contractor shall immediately cease all earth-
disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of
discovery. The Property Owner/Developer shall retain a
qualified Archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), subject to
approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to evaluate
the significance of the find and to determine an
appropriate course of action. All artifacts except for
human remains and related grave goods or sacred objects
belong to the Property Owner.
All artifacts discovered at the development site shall be
inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist.
Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried,
assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/D
Page 911
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
16
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal
placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these
artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the
Property Owner, as deemed appropriate.
If any artifacts of Native American origin are discovered,
the Property Owner/Developer and Project Archaeologist
shall notify the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Department and the appropriate local Native American
tribe identified by the Native American Heritage
Commission. The significance of Native American
resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the
provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs,
customs, and practices of the tribe (refer to MM 14-1
though MM 14-6 in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural
Resources). All items found in association with Native
American human remains shall be considered grave goods
or sacred in origin and subject to special handling (see RR
4-1).
Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project
Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no
longer necessary, monitoring activities may be
discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department.
Page 912
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
17
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of
recovered artifacts, shall be prepared upon completion of
the steps outlined above. The report shall include a
discussion of the significance of all recovered artifacts.
The report and inventory, when submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, shall signify
completion of the program to mitigate impacts to
archaeological and/or cultural resources. A copy of the
report shall also be filed with the Archaeological
Information Center (AIC) at the San Bernardino County
Museum and the Native American tribe, as appropriate.
Energy
RR 5-1 Construction activities shall be conducted in
compliance with Section 2449, General Requirements for
In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets, of the California
Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 13, Motor Vehicles.
Section 2449(d)(2) limits idling times of construction
vehicles to no more than five consecutive minutes.
Adherence to idling limitations shall be confirmed through
periodic site inspections conducted by City building
officials.
BO C
During grading
and
construction
A
Geology and Soils
RR 6-1 In accordance with the City’s Building Regulations,
as contained in Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which includes
BO B/C
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
A/C
Page 913
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
18
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
adoption of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), all
construction on the Project site shall comply with the CBC
and the amendments and exemptions to the CBC that the
City has adopted. This Title requires site-specific
investigation and establishes construction standards and
inspection procedures to ensure that development does
not pose a threat to public safety.
RR 6-2 All grading operations and construction on the
Project site shall be conducted in conformance with the
applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading Standards
(Municipal Code Chapter 19.04). Grading operations shall
also be consistent with the recommendations included in
the Project-specific Geotechnical Investigation prepared
by SCG for the Project.
BO B/C During
construction A/C
RR 6-3 Development on the Project site shall comply with
Section 17.66.060 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code, with regard to dust control.
Specifically, “no dust or particulate matter shall be
emitted that is detectable by a reasonable person without
instruments.”
BO B/C
Prior to issuance
of building
permits/during
construction
A/C
RR 6-4 In accordance with Chapter 17.56, Landscaping
Standards, of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,
which establishes minimum landscape requirements to
control soil erosion, among other purposes, development
on the Project site shall submit preliminary and final
PD A
Prior to
approval of site
plans
C/D
Page 914
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
19
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
landscape and irrigation plans as part of the design review
process (Section 17.20.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code).
MM 6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the
Project Applicant shall submit to and receive approval
from the City, a Paleontological Resource Impact
Mitigation Monitoring Program (PRIMMP). The PRIMMP
shall include the provision of a qualified professional
paleontologist (or his or her trained paleontological
monitor representative) during on-site subsurface
excavation of Quaternary (i.e., early Holocene and late
Pleistocene) alluvial-fan deposits, as outlined below.
Selection of the paleontologist shall be subject to approval
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director, or
designee, and no grading activities shall occur at the site
until the paleontologist has been approved by the City.
The PRIMMP shall include the requirements below.
• Monitoring of mass grading and excavation
activities in areas identified as likely to contain
paleontological resources shall be performed by a
qualified paleontologist or paleontological
monitor. Monitoring shall be conducted full time
in areas of grading or excavation activities that
occur in undisturbed exposures of Quaternary
(i.e., early Holocene and late Pleistocene) alluvial-
PD B/C/D
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
D
Page 915
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
20
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
fan deposits at a depth of 12 feet and below in
order to mitigate any adverse impacts (loss or
destruction) to potential nonrenewable
paleontological resources. For grading and other
earth disturbance activities at depths between 5
and 12 feet below the surface, periodic spot
checks for potential paleontological resources
shall be conducted. Periodic monitoring shall
consist of approximately 1 to 3 scheduled site
visits per week by a paleontological monitor
during construction ground disturbance. If
significant fossils are discovered during a spot
check, full-time monitoring should be initiated.3
• Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to
salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid
construction delays and to remove samples of
sediment that are likely to contain the remains of
small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The
monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt
or divert equipment to allow for the removal of
abundant or large specimens in a timely manner.
Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially
fossiliferous units are not present in the
subsurface, or if they are present, are determined
upon exposure and examination by qualified
Page 916
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
21
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
paleontological personnel to have low potential to
contain fossil resources.
•Recovered specimens shall be prepared to a point
of identification and permanent preservation,
including screen-washing sediments to recover
small invertebrates and vertebrates, if indicated
by the results of test sampling. Preparation of
individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-
consuming than for accumulations of invertebrate
fossils.
•All fossils shall be deposited in an accredited
institution, such as the San Bernardino County
Museum, that maintains collections of
paleontological materials. All costs of the
paleontological monitoring and mitigation
program, including any one-time charges by the
receiving institution, are the responsibility of the
Project Applicant.
The Project Paleontologist shall prepare of a final
monitoring and mitigation report of findings and
significance, including lists of all fossils recovered
and necessary maps and graphics to accurately
record their original location(s). A letter
documenting receipt and acceptance of all fossil
Page 917
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
22
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
collections by the receiving institution must be
included in the final report. The report, when
submitted to (and accepted by) the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, shall signify satisfactory completion
of the project program to mitigate impacts to any
nonrenewable paleontological resources.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
RR 8-1 The Project Applicant shall comply with the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, as administered
by the U.S. Department of Transportation, which governs
the transport of hazardous materials and wastes. Vehicles
transporting hazardous materials are required to comply
with the regulations, as implemented by the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans).
FC C/E
During
construction
and operations
A/B
RR 8-2 The Project Applicant shall comply with the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the
California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and the California
Accidental Release Prevention Program, where applicable,
which collectively manage the transport, storage, use, and
disposal of hazardous materials and wastes.
FC C/E
During
construction
and operations
A/B
RR 8-3 The Project Applicant shall comply with Section
17.66.040, Hazardous Materials, of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code to ensure that required
information is reported to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, as the regulatory authority. Businesses
FC E During
operations A/B/D
Page 918
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
23
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
required by State law to prepare hazardous materials
release response plans and Hazardous Materials Inventory
Statements shall, upon request, submit copies of these
plans, including any revisions, to the Fire Protection
District. Underground storage of hazardous materials shall
comply with all applicable requirements and shall comply
with the procedures for notification outlined in this
section.
RR 8-4 The Project site is within the Airport Influence Area
(AIA) established by the LA/Ontario International Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP). Construction
activities and future development shall be implemented in
compliance with the following applicable requirement
identified in the ONT ALUCP:
• Real Estate Transaction Disclosure. In compliance
with Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for
LA/Ontario Airport’s (ONT ALUCP’s) Overflight
Policy O2, a Real Estate Transaction Disclosure is
required for all development within the Project
site. State Law (Business and Professions Code
Section 11010) provides the following disclosure
language:
NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN VICINITY: This property is
presently located in the vicinity of an airport,
PD D
Prior to
certificate of
occupancy for
buildings and
tenant
improvements
D
Page 919
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
24
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
within what is known as an airport influence
area. For that reason, the property may be
subject to some of the annoyances or
inconveniences associated with proximity to
airport operations (for example, noise, vibration,
or odors). Individual sensitivities to those
annoyances can vary from person to person. You
may wish to consider what airport annoyances,
if any, are associated with the property before
you complete your purchase and determine
whether they are acceptable to you.
Hydrology and Water Quality
RR 9-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges
Associated with Construction Activity (Construction
General Permit) applicable at the time a grading permit is
issued. The Property Owner/Developer shall prepare and
implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which must include erosion- and sediment-
control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will meet
or exceed measures required by the determined risk level
of the Construction General Permit, as well as BMPs that
control the other potential construction related
pollutants. A Construction Site Monitoring Program that
BO A/B/C
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits/during
construction
A/B/D
Page 920
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
25
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
identifies monitoring and sampling requirements during
construction is a required component of the SWPPP.
Evidence of compliance with the NPDES Construction
General Permit shall be provided to the City’s Building and
Safety Services Director prior to issuance of a grading
permit.
RR 9-2 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with
Section 19.20.260, Water Quality Management Plan, of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which requires
that all qualifying land development/redevelopment
projects submit and have approved a water quality
management plan (WQMP) to the City Engineer on a form
provided by the City. The WQMP shall identify all BMPs to
be incorporated into the Project to control storm water
and non-storm water pollutants during and after
construction.
BO A/B
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits
D
RR 9-3 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with
Chapter 19.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
which is the City’s Storm Water and Urban Runoff
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance and which
provides regulations to comply with the Clean Water Act
(CWA), the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality
Control Act, and the NPDES permit for San Bernardino
County. This ordinance prohibits the discharge of specific
pollutants into the storm water; regulates connections to
BO E During
operations A/B
Page 921
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
26
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
the storm drain system; and requires development
projects to implement permanent BMPs on individual
sites to reduce pollutants in the storm water.
Noise
MM 11-1 Prior to issuance of grading or building permits,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall review the plans to
ensure the plans require the installation of a minimum 6-
foot-high temporary construction perimeter noise barrier
along the Project site’s boundary with the San Bernardino
County West Valley Detention Center. The location and
following specifications for the noise control barrier shall
also be included on the plans:
• The noise control barriers must present a solid
face from top to bottom.
• The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of
the following materials with no decorative cutouts
or line-of-sight openings between shielded areas
and the noise source:
o An acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic
curtains, quilted blankets, or equivalent)
attached to the construction-site
perimeter fence or equivalent temporary
fence posts.
BO B
Prior to issuance
of grading or
building permits
A/C
Page 922
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
27
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
o Any combination of construction materials
satisfying a weight of at least 4 pounds per
square foot of face area.
• The noise barriers shall be maintained, and
any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes,
or weaknesses in the barrier or openings
between the barrier and the ground shall be
promptly repaired.
The required barrier shall be installed prior to any
construction activities commencing on-site and shall
remain in place until construction activities have been
completed. The construction contractor shall allow for
periodic inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
ensure that the required noise barrier remains in place
until completion of construction activities on-site.
MM 11-2 During all Project site construction, the
construction contractors shall equip all construction
equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and
maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’
standards. The construction contractor shall place all
stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise
is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors
nearest the Project site. The construction contractor shall
allow for periodic inspection by the City of Rancho
BO C
During grading
and
construction
A
Page 923
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
28
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
Cucamonga to ensure compliance with these
requirements.
Transportation
RR 13-1 During construction activities, work within
streets, sidewalks, and public places shall comply with: (1)
Title 12.03, Public Improvement Construction, of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which requires an
encroachment permit from the City and adherence to the
current edition of The Standard Specifications for Public
Works Construction (Green Book), and (2) the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
Application for the permit shall be made as part of the
respective plan check process and prior to any work on
public areas or rights-of-way.
CE B/C
Prior to issuance
of building
permits/during
construction
A/B/C
RR 13-2 In accordance with Chapter 3.28, City-Wide
System Fees for Transportation Development, of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, prior to the
issuance of each building permit, the Property
Owner/Developer shall pay applicable city-wide
transportation development impact fees to the
satisfaction of the City Engineering Department.
CE A/B
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
C
RR 13-3 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with
Chapter 17.78, Transportation Demand Management, of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which
requires the provision of amenities or programs to
PD A
Prior to issuance
of tenant
improvement
permits
C
Page 924
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
29
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
encourage the use of alternative modes of travel by
employees; patrons; and visitors of commercial, industrial,
office, and mixed-use developments. These may include,
but are limited to shower facilities, preferred parking,
bicycle storage, video conference facilities, transit
improvements, and other measures to reduce vehicle trips
in the City. These facilities shall be shown in the site
improvement and building plans submitted to the City
during the permit process.
RR 13-4 In accordance with Chapter 10.56, Truck Routes
and Restrictions, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, commercial vehicles and vehicle
combinations described in Sections 35400 and 35401 of
the California Vehicle Code, or their successor provisions,
and vehicles which exceed a maximum gross weight of
three tons shall use designated truck routes. Non-
designated truck routes shall be used only as necessary
for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods,
wares, and merchandise from or to any building or
structure located on a city street or for the purpose of
delivering materials to be used in the repair, alteration,
remodeling, or construction of any building or structure
upon a city street for which a building permit has
previously been obtained.
CE C/E
During
construction
and operations
A
Page 925
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
30
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
RR 13-5 Work in the public right-of-way along 4th Street
in the City of Ontario shall comply with Title 7, Chapter 3,
Public Rights-of-Way, of the City of Ontario Municipal
Code, which requires an encroachment permit from the
City. Application for the permit shall be made as part of
the respective plan check process and prior to any work
on public areas or rights-of-way.
CE B/C
Prior to the
issuance of
building
permits/during
construction
A/B/C
Tribal Cultural Resources
MM 14-1 Prior to the commencement of any ground
disturbing activity at the Project Site, the Project Applicant
shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the
Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation – the tribe
that consulted on this project pursuant to Assembly Bill
A52 - SB18 (the “Tribe” or the “Consulting Tribe”). A copy
of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga prior to the issuance of any permit
necessary to commence a ground- disturbing activity. The
Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the
construction phases that involve ground-disturbing
activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the
Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to,
pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree
removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and
trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor shall
complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide
PD B/C
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit/during
grading and
construction
A/B
Page 926
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
31
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction
activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials
identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all
ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are
completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal
Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-
disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no
potential for impacting tribal cultural resources. Upon
discovery of any tribal cultural resources, construction
activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find
(not less than the surrounding 50 feet) until the find can
be assessed. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by
project activities shall be evaluated by the Tribal monitor
approved by the Consulting Tribe and a qualified
archaeologist if one is present. If the resources are Native
American in origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain
it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems
appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic
purposes. If human remains and/or grave goods are
discovered or recognized at the Project Site, all ground
disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county
coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section
7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be
treated alike per California Public Resources Code section
Page 927
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
32
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue in other parts
of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary,
mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5[f]). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the
preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is
not feasible, treatment may include implementation of
archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the
resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and
analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not
Native American in origin (non-TCR) shall be curated at a
public, non-profit institution with a research interest in
the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an
institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution
accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a
local school or historical society in the area for
educational purposes.
MM 14-2 Native American human remains are defined in
PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in
any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.
Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC
5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.
Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any
discoveries of human skeletal material shall be
immediately reported to the County Coroner and
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/B
Page 928
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
33
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
excavation halted until the coroner has determined the
nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the
human remains to be those of a Native American or has
reason to believe that they are those of a Native
American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24
hours, the NAHC and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.
MM 14-3 Upon discovery of human remains, the tribal
and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant
shall immediately divert work at minimum of 100 feet and
place an exclusion zone around the discovery location.
The monitor/consultant(s) shall then notify the Tribe, the
qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction
manager who shall call the coroner. Work shall continue
to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the
remains are human and subsequently Native American.
The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to
prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are
determined to be Native American, the coroner shall
notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who shall then
appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD).
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/B
MM 14-4 If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh
Nation is designated MLD, the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy
shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human
remains” encompasses more than human bones. In
ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/B
Page 929
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
34
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the
soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the
deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.
The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in
the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.
Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the
death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably
believed to have been placed with individual human
remains either at the time of death or later; other items
made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human
remains can also be considered as associated funerary
objects.
MM 14-5 Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing
activities, the landowner shall arrange a designated site
location within the footprint of the project for the
respectful reburial of the human remains and/or
ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human
remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on
the same day, the remains shall be covered with muslin
cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy
equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect
the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a
24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours.
The Tribe shall make every effort to recommend diverting
the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected.
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/D
Page 930
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
35
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined
that burials shall be removed. The Tribe shall work closely
with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the
excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully.
If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation
shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed
descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of
documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data
recovery purposes. Cremations shall either be removed in
bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely
recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains
includes four or more burials, the location is considered a
cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.
Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be
submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT
authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any
invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human
remains.
Each occurrence of human remains and associated
funerary objects shall be stored using opaque cloth bags.
All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and
objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure
container on-site if possible. These items should be
retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The
site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but
Page 931
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
36
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the
landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There
shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials
recovered.
MM 14-6 Native American and Archaeological monitoring
during construction projects shall be consistent with
current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid
any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or
separation of TCR’s shall be taken. The Native American
monitor must be approved by the Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. Principal personnel for
Archaeology must meet the Secretary of Interior
standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10
years of experience as a principal investigator working
with Native American archaeological sites in southern
California.
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/D
Utilities and Services
RR 15-1 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and
constructed to meet the applicable requirements of the
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Municipal Code
and City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Approval of the plans by the CVWD is required prior to
final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever
occurs first.
CE A/B
Prior to final
map approval or
issuance of
building
permits,
whichever
occurs first
B/D
Page 932
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
37
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
RR 15-2 Landscaping associated with the Project shall be
implemented in compliance with Chapter 17.56 of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which requires
preparation and review of landscape and irrigation plans
during the Design Review process. Pursuant to Section
17.56.030(B) of the Development Code, the final
landscape planting and irrigation plans shall be prepared
by a registered licensed Landscape Architect and shall be
in substantial compliance with the preliminary landscape
and irrigation plan approved by the designated approving
authority.
PD A/B During design
review C/D
RR 15-3 Landscape plans prepared for the Project shall be
in compliance with Chapter 17.82, Water Efficient
Landscaping, of the City Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code, which includes requirements for development of a
water budget, landscape design guidelines, soil and
grading requirements, and a requirement to use recycled
water.
PD A/B
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
C
RR 15-4 Demolition and construction activities on the
Project site shall be conducted in compliance with
requirements of Chapter 8.19, Construction and
Demolition Waste Collection, of the City’s Municipal Code.
Construction and demolition waste shall be made
available for deconstruction, salvage, and recovery prior
to demolition. Inclusive of the recovered and salvaged
CE A/B/D
Prior to issuance
of demolition,
grading, and
building
construction
permits/after
construction
C/D
Page 933
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
38
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
materials, all construction and demolition projects are
required to divert a minimum of 65% of the tonnage
generated as a result of the project from the landfill. Prior
to issuance of each Demolition or Building Permit, a “Form
CD-1 Waste Management and Recycling Plan” shall be
submitted to the Engineering Services Department.
RR 15-5 Development shall comply with Chapter 8.17,
Refuse, Recyclables and Green Waste Collection, of the
City’s Municipal Code. The collection and disposal of
refuse, recyclables or green waste shall only be conducted
by entities issued a permit to do so by the City, with
certain exceptions, as identified in the Municipal Code.
CE E
After issuance
of occupancy
permits
A
Conditions of Approval Requested by the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI)
Cultural Resources
CR-1 In the event that cultural resources are discovered
during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity
of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a
qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior
standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the
other portions of the project outside of the buffered area
may continue during this assessment period. Additionally,
the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural
Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as
detailed within TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact and/or
historic-era finds and be provided information after the
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A
Page 934
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
39
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the
nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with
regards to significance and treatment.
CR-2 If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural
resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are
discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the
archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment
Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for
review and comment, as detailed within TCR-1. The
archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project
and implement the Plan accordingly.
PD C
During grading
and
construction
D
CR-3 If human remains or funerary objects are
encountered during any activities associated with the
project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot
buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner
shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety
Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of
the project.
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/B
Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1 The SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be
contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or
historic-era cultural resources discovered during project
implementation, and be provided information regarding
the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with
regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be
PD C
During grading
and
construction
A/D
Page 935
Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification
PD: Planning Director
CE: City Engineer or designee
BO: Building Official or designee
PO: Police Captain or designee
FC: Fire Chief or designee
A: With Each New Development
B: Prior to Construction
C: Throughout Construction
D: On Completion
E: During Construction
A: On-site Inspection
B: Other Agency Permit/Approval
C: Plan Check
D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)
40
Mitigation Measure No. / Implementing Action Responsible
for Monitoring
Monitoring
Frequency
Timing of
Verification
Method of
Verification
Verified
Date/Initials
deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended,
2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan
shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with
SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this
Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that
represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project,
should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.
TCR-2 Any and all archaeological/cultural documents
created as a part of the project (isolate records, site
records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be
supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for
dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or
applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI
throughout the life of the project.
PD C
During grading
and
construction
D
Page 936
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH
No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program.
1.
No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space,
consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report.
2.
Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this
prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA.
3.
No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a
fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as
defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project’s Draft EIR.
4.
The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval.5.
The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work
impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The
applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such
expenses as they become due.
9.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 937
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
10.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW's current fee schedule, including
all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning
Commission/City Council.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this
Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to
submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review
by the City.
13.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in
accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install
art onsite pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant
to Development Agreement DRC2021-00180.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
14.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
15.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
16.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code
and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and
slope planting.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 938
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
20.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
21.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
22.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all
applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
23.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
24.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
25.
The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be
submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy prior to approval of the final map
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 939
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the
building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the
Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks
(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project,
these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to
match the building
Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way.
These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and
have a width equal to that of the driveway.
27.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The applicant shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and
6th Street. The public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A.
1.
(At-Grade Crossing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road
along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street
at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79.
2.
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
3.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
(Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 940
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider
for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric
service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and
RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the
proposed development.
2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The City will require the developer to install a 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the
development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3’x4’x3’
pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the
conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and
subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within
a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137
and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit
and/or vaults shall run into each of the development’s individual telecommunication room and be shown
on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes
first.
5.
The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington
Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled
by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans
standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install
the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda,
and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues.
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 941
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements
identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of
occupancy of the project's first building.
1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd.
A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the I-15 and East
Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour.
B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn
lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of $37,089.
2. At the intersection of the I-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St.
A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn
lanes.
B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes.
3. At the intersection of the I-15 northbound ramps and 4th St.
A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length.
7.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
60 total feet on 4th Street
44 total feet on 6th Street
66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street (full right of way width)
8.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.9.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by
CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is
involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm
drainage.
10.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
11.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
12.
A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development
Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits.
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 942
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
14.
Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the
City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 3B,
SLD 1 & SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s).
15.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are
currently annexed into LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6.
16.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
17.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 943
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: 4th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: 6th Street
Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design
A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design
Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street
Curb & Gutter: Per City Standards
A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards
Side-walk : Per City Standards
Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy
Street Lights: Per City Standards
Street Trees: Per City Standards
Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to
new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer.
Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)
Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 944
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
19.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to
cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 945
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name: 4th Street
Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space: 30
Spacing: 30
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: 6th Street
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street (both sides of street)
Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora
Common Name: St Mary
Min. Grow Space: 20
Spacing: 20
Size: 15 gallon minimum
Qty.: to be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
21.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 946
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
22.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
23.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
24.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.25.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
26.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
27.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
28.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite
storm water retention.
This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 947
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD
85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at
(909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement
will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts
notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.
2.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal
distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.
4.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
5.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
6.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
9.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
10.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
11.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
12.
Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit.
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
13.
Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
14.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 948
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
16.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
17.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
18.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
19.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
20.
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
22.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
23.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
24.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 949
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
26.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
27.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
28.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
30.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
32.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
34.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 950
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA
Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and
building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of
plan check submittal.
The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'.
Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer
are from 4th street to serve building 2.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 951
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 952
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building
pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County
Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates.
17.
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be
prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 953
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
20.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
21.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface
profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall
be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm
water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
22.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
23.
DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and
fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer
of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of
the storm water retention.
24.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
26.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 954
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
28.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
29.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
30.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
31.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
32.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
33.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
34.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 955
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
36.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
38.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
39.
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
40.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased
WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural
devices may be constructed as construction progresses.
41.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
42.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 956
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
43.
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 957
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or
maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car
dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
45.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 958
Project #: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266,
DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271
Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 12434 4TH ST - 022928350-0000
Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of
Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map
AmendmentALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
46.
www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 23Printed: 10/11/2021 Page 959
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
April 20, 2021
7:00 p.m.
Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner
LOCATED AT 12322 AND 12434 4TH STREET – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
LLC – A request for a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative Parcel
Map, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit and Development Agreement to allow for the
development of two industrial warehouse buildings on certain property located approximately
1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th
Street and south of 6th Street; APNs: 0229-283-50 and -51. File Number DRC2020-00202.
Site Characteristics: The project site totals approximately 91.39 acres and is comprised of two
adjacent parcels (APNs: 0229-283-50 and -51). These parcels are generally located between
Santa Anita Avenue to the west, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, 4th Street to the south and 6th
Street to the north. Both parcels have “double” street frontage along 6th Street and along 4th
Street. A rail spur running east to west is present along the north side of the project site. It is
aligned parallel to 6th Street. At the northeast corner of the project site this rail spur turns south
into the property, running north to south parallel to the easterly property line of the project site.
Staff notes that there is an approximate 40-foot elevation difference between 4th and 6th Streets
which spans the site from north to south - a distance of approximately 3,200 feet.
The site is currently improved with two buildings: a large industrial warehouse building
addressed 12434 4th Street totaling approximately 1,431,000 square feet and a smaller concrete
tilt-up building addressed 12322 4th Street totaling approximately 23,240 square feet. Both
existing buildings were built in 1984. The larger building served as a distribution center and the
smaller building served as a retail store for Big Lots until this tenant vacated the site in February
2020. Currently, the large warehouse building is occupied by Geodis Logistics and is being used
as a temporary distribution facility. This tenant plans to vacate the site in May 2021. The smaller
concrete tilt-up building formerly housing the Big Lots retail store is currently vacant with no
plans for a future tenant. The remainder of the project site comprises landscaped areas, drive
aisles, parking areas and trailer parking and loading areas. A portion of the project site along 6th
Street comprises approximately 11 acres of vacant land which was previously a vineyard. All
existing improvements are proposed to be demolished as part of the proposed project.
Staff notes that the project site is currently divided between both the General Industrial and
Heavy Industrial General Plan land use designations. Similarly, the project site is also split
between the General Industrial (GI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts. The Committee
should note that the subject development application involves a request for a General Plan
Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to convert the entire project site to the General
Industrial land use designation and General Industrial (GI) zoning district.
The existing land use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent
properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse and
Heavy Industrial and General
Industrial
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
General Industrial (GI) Districts
Attachment 13Page960
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2020-00202 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC.
April 20, 2021
Page 2
Commercial
Retail
North Industrial Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario) Industrial Industrial (Crossroads Business
Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) and
General Industrial (GI) Districts
East Industrial and
Public Facility
Heavy Industrial and
Civic/Regional
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
General Industrial (GI) Districts
Project Overview: The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into two new parcels,
Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, in order to accommodate the construction of two new industrial
warehouse buildings totaling a cumulative 2,175,000 square feet in size. Parcel 1 is proposed to
have an area of approximately 55 acres with street frontage along 4th Street and will be
improved with Building 1 totaling 1,422,500 square feet. Parcel 2 is proposed to have an area of
approximately 30 acres with street frontage along 6th Street and will be improved with Building 2
totaling 752,500 square feet. As a result of this project, a new public road (labeled as “Street A”
in the attached plan set), is proposed to be constructed. Street A will run parallel to the east
property line of the project site, aligned north to south, and will connect 4th Street and 6th Street.
Building 1 will have office and mezzanine areas not to exceed 25,000 square feet and a
maximum height of 54 feet. Building 2 will have office and mezzanine areas not to exceed
16,000 square feet and a maximum height of 50 feet. Access will be provided to Building 1 from
4th Street and the new Street A. Access to Building 2 will be provided from 6th Street and the
new Street A. The applicant is proposing this project as speculative development and no
tenants have been identified for either building at this time.
As the project site is bounded to the north and east by an existing rail spur, the project is
required to demonstrate that rail service is possible pursuant to Development Code Section
17.36.040.D.6. The applicant is not required to construct rail-related improvements on the
property. However, the plans must demonstrate that the site could have a functional/practical
rail service if any future owner/tenant decides that rail service is required/desired. Accordingly,
the applicant has provided an Alternative Rail Serve Plan (Sheet A1-5P of the attached plan
set). The applicant’s Alternative Rail Serve Plan demonstrates that both buildings can
accommodate rail pursuant to Development Code standards.
The proposed industrial warehouse buildings meet the City’s 360-degree architectural
standards. Each building provides well-defined articulation and a varied use of architectural
features creating an attractive aesthetic. For example, the long span of each façade facing both
4th and 6th Streets provides a well-articulated wall plane. Further, the street facing corner of each
building provide office tower elements which exhibit a vertical concrete accent feature. These
corner elements also provide an aluminum storefront system framed by an aluminum panel
cornice. Throughout each elevation, the typical concrete tilt-up façade is punctuated by panel
joints, reveals and windows. The project also provides an attractive and varied color pallet to
break up the expanse of the façade which includes “Pure White Field Color” (Sherwin Williams
SW 7005), “Network Gray” (SW 7073), “Cyberspace” (SW 7076), and “Dignity Blue” (SW 6804).
Page 961
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2020-00202 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC.
April 20, 2021
Page 3
The proposed project complies with all applicable development standards for the General
Industrial (GI) District, as shown in the table below:
Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, 17.64.090 and Table 17.64.050-1, auto
parking for warehouse/storage uses is based on a tiered ratio as illustrated in the table below. In
addition, office areas require parking at 1 stall per 250 square feet. Further, the development
code requires 1 trailer loading stall for each dock door proposed. As such, the proposed project
is required to provide 469 auto parking stalls and 184 trailer loading stalls for Building 1, and
268 auto parking stalls and 91 trailer loading stalls for Building 2. The table below demonstrates
the project’s compliance with all parking standards:
Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking Complies?
Warehouse/storage
and office
1 per 1,000 sf for the first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for
the next 20,000 sf, and 1 per
4,000 sf for remaining sf
Office requires 1 per 250 sf
Building
1: 469
stalls;
Building
2: 268
stalls
Building 1:
478;
Building 2:
268
YES
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height
Maximum 35 feet (at front
setback) and
75 feet (1-foot increment
from the front setback
line)
Building 1: 54 feet; Building 2:
50 feet YES
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) 50-60% Building 1: 59.2%; Building 2:
57.8% YES
Front Building
Setback
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street)
Building 1: ~118 feet
(4th Street); Building 2: ~215
feet (6th Street)
YES
Street Side
Setback 25 Feet (Street A) Building 1: ~185 feet;
Building 2: ~93 feet YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
45 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
YES
Parking Setback
25 feet (4th Street);
20 feet (6th Street);
15 feet (Street A)
46 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Street A)
YES
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet Building 1: 136 feet
Building 2: 45 feet YES
Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet Building 1: 77 feet
Building 2: ~90 feet YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10% 10% YES
Page 962
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2020-00202 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC.
April 20, 2021
Page 4
Trailer Loading
Stalls 1 per loading dock
Building
1: 184;
Building
2: 91
Building 1:
221;
Building 2:
91
YES
The project also meets all relevant landscape standards, as noted in the table above. 589 trees
exist onsite which include 125 heritage trees. The project will result in the removal of 464 non-
heritage trees and 101 heritage trees. 24 existing heritage trees will remain in place. In addition
to these heritage trees remaining in place, and pursuant to the Development Code, the project
will also result in 712 onsite trees, including 229 new street trees and 107 replacement heritage
trees. Ornamental ground cover and shrubs make up the balance of the landscaped area.
Staff Comments
Major/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee
discussion regarding the project:
None.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or
proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the
office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the
review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire
Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC)
screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project, these walls shall be constructed of
poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building.
2. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public
right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the
building setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway.
3. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All
downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls.
Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the
design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the
selected action below to the Planning Director / Planning Commission:
× Recommend approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
☐Recommend approval with modifications to the design of the project by incorporating
revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The
revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning
Commission.
Page 963
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2020-00202 – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC.
April 20, 2021
Page 5
☐Recommend conditional approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions
requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions
shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by
the Planning Director / Planning Commission.
☐Recommend revisions to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by
the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is required prior to review and action by the
Planning Director / Planning Commission.
☐Recommend denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
Staff Planner: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner
Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner
Attachment: Exhibit A: Project Plans
Page 964
DATE:September 22, 2021
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, AICP
SUBJECT:LOCATED AT 12322 and 12434 4th Street – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, LLC – Recommendation to the City Council for a General Plan
Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267),
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree
Removal Permit (DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and
Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180) to allow for the development of two
industrial warehouse buildings on certain property located approximately 1,000
feet east of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of
4th Street and south of 6th Street; APNS: 0229-283-50 and 51. An Environmental
Impact Report (SCH No. 2020100056) was prepared for the project. Primary Case
File No. DRC2020-00202.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental
Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring
and reporting program, and approve General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning Map Amendment
(DRC2020-00267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree Removal
Permit (DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development Agreement (DRC2021-
00180) through the adoption of the attached Resolutions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, proposes the construction of two new industrial
warehouse buildings totaling approximately 2,175,000 square feet combined on property currently addressed as
12322 and 12434 4th Street. The project requires the demolition of existing structures located on the site totaling
approximately 1,454,240 square feet combined, which includes one existing industrial warehouse building
totaling approximately 1,431,000 square feet and one retail building totaling approximately 23,240 square feet.
The proposed project includes the construction of one new north-south street which will connect 4th Street and
6th Street. The applicant and City have negotiated a development agreement which includes a variety of
provisions intended to off-set any adverse impacts the project may cause that are not otherwise mitigated through
CEQA.
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.14.060.B, “when a proposed project requires more than one permit
with more than one approving authority, all project permits shall be processed concurrently, and final action
shall be taken by the highest-level designated approving authority for all such requested permits.” The City
Council is the highest-level approving authority because it must approve the General Plan and Zoning
amendments and development agreement. Staff has opted to process the package of entitlements concurrently
such that the Planning Commission is the recommending body for all of the entitlements.
Attachment 14Page965
Page 2 of 10
9
3
1
BACKGROUND:
The project site totals approximately 91.39 acres and is comprised of two adjacent parcels (APN: 0229-283-50
and 0229-283-51), generally located between Santa Anita Avenue to the west, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, 4th
Street to the south and 6th Street to the north. A rail spur running east and west borders the property to the north
parallel to 6th Street which serves the subject site and the site to the east, north of the West Valley Detention
Center. This rail spur also turns south into the property, running north and south parallel to the easterly property
line. Staff notes that there is an approximate 40-foot elevation difference between 4th and 6th Streets which spans
the site from north to south, approximately 3,200 feet.
The site is currently improved with two buildings: a large industrial warehouse building addressed 12434 4th
Street, totaling approximately 1,431,000 square feet in size and a smaller concrete tilt-up building addressed
12322 4th Street, totaling approximately 23,240 square feet. Both existing buildings were built in 1984, with the
larger building serving as a distribution center for Big Lots, and the smaller building serving as a retail store for
Big Lots, until this tenant vacated the site in February 2020. Most recently, the large warehouse building was
occupied by Geodis Logistics as a temporary distribution facility. This tenant only recently vacated the site in
May 2021, but the facility currently remains viable for warehouse uses. The smaller concrete tilt-up building
formerly housing the Big Lots retail store is currently vacant. The remainder of the project site comprises
landscaped areas, drive aisles, parking areas and trailer parking and loading areas. A portion of the project site
along 6th Street comprises approximately 11 acres of vacant land which was previously a vineyard. All existing
improvements with the exception of the existing rail spur will be demolished as part of the proposed project.
After the applicant submitted their application, but before it was deemed complete, the City Council enacted a
moratorium on November 4, 2020 to prohibit certain industrial uses while the City updated its code standards in
response to rising interest and significant demand for the development of new industrial uses and the
redevelopment of legacy uses largely located within the Southeast Industrial Quadrant (SEIQ), an area of the
City bounded by Arrow Route to the north, 4th Street to the south, I-15 Freeway to the west, and the City’s
jurisdictional limit line to the east. Following the expiration of the moratorium on June 30, 2021, the City Council
adopted Ordinance 982 on July 7 which established new development standards for industrial projects
throughout the City in response to this demand in industrial development. Notably, the subject project is deemed
exempt from Ordinance 982 as the subject development application had been deemed complete on March 11,
2021, which is prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.02.020F.1, “all
land use permit applications that are active and that have been determined by the planning director to be
complete before the effective date of this title, or any amendments thereto, will be processed according to the
regulations in effect when the application was deemed complete.” Thus, as the subject application was deemed
complete prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, it has been analyzed against standards in effect prior to the
adoption of Ordinance 982.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
The project site is currently divided between both the General Industrial (GI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) General
Plan land use designations. Similarly, the project site is also split between the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial
Employment (IE) zoning districts. The development application also includes a request for a General Plan
Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to convert the entire project site to the General Industrial (GI) land
use designation and Neo-Industrial (GI) zoning district.
The existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning*
Site Industrial Warehouse,
Commercial Retail
and former vineyard
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
General Industrial (GI)
Industrial Employment (IE)
and General Industrial (GI)
District
Page 966
Page 3 of 10
9
3
1
*Prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, the Neo-Industrial District was referred to as the General Industrial District and the Industrial
Employment District was referred to as the Heavy Industrial District.
The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into two new parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, in order to
accommodate the construction of two new industrial warehouse buildings totaling a cumulative 2,175,000 square
feet in size. Parcel 1 proposes an area of approximately 55 acres with street frontage along 4th Street and will
be improved with Building 1 totaling 1,422,500 square feet. Parcel 2 proposes an area of approximately 30 acres
with street frontage along 6th Street and will be improved with Building 2 totaling 752,500 square feet. As a result
of this project, a new public road (labeled as “Street A” in the attached plan set), is proposed to be constructed.
The City has determined that this new street shall be named ”Catherine Bridge Place,” in honor of First Lieutenant
Catherine Vail Bridge, a long time resident who served in World War II as a Women Airforce Service Pilot (WASP)
and who was a critical proponent of the City’s incorporation. Catherine Bridge Place will run parallel to the
easterly property line of the project site running north and south and will connect 4th Street and 6th Street providing
street frontage to both new parcels.
Building 1 will have office and mezzanine areas not to exceed 25,000 square feet and a maximum height of 54
feet. Building 2 will have office and mezzanine areas not to exceed 16,000 square feet and a maximum height
of 50 feet. Access will be provided to Building 1 from 4th Street and Catherine Bridge Place. Access to Building
2 will be provided from 6th Street and Catherine Bridge Place. The applicant is proposing this project as
speculative development and no tenants have been identified for either building at his time. However, the
applicant has agreed to preclude so-called “sort” use tenants that serve as distribution centers for smaller items
that require extensive, manual sorting and generate greater traffic demands. The applicant has applied for a
minor use permit for a large distribution center/warehouse that does not incorporate a sort use.
Architecture: The proposed industrial warehouse buildings meet the City’s 360-degree architectural standards.
Each building provides well-defined articulation and a varied use of architectural features creating an attractive
aesthetic. For example, the long span of each façade facing both 4th and 6th Streets provides a well-articulated
wall plane. Further, the street facing corner of each building provides office tower elements which exhibit a
vertical concrete accent feature. These corner elements also provide an aluminum storefront system framed by
an aluminum panel cornice. Throughout each elevation, the typical concrete tilt-up façade is punctuated by panel
joints, reveals and windows. The project also provides an attractive and varied color pallet to break up the
expanse of the façade which includes “Pure White Field Color” (Sherwin Williams SW 7005), “Network Gray”
(SW 7073), “Cyberspace” (SW 7076), and “Dignity Blue” (SW 6804).
The proposed project exceeds all applicable development standards according to the development code prior to
the adoption of Ordinance 982 for the Neo-Industrial (NI) district (formerly General Industrial), as shown in the
table below:
North Industrial Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment (IE)
District
South Industrial
(City of Ontario)
Industrial Industrial (Crossroads
Business Park Specific Plan)
West Industrial General Industrial (GI)Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI) District
East Industrial and Public
Facility
Heavy Industrial (HI) and
Civic/Regional
Industrial Employment (IE)
and Neo-Industrial (NI) District
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height Maximum 35 feet (at front
setback) and
Building 1: 54 feet; Building 2: 50 feet YES
Page 967
Page 4 of 10
9
3
1
Parking: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, 17.64.090 and Table 17.64.050-1, auto parking for
warehouse/storage uses is based on a tiered ratio as illustrated in the table below. In addition, office areas
require parking at 1 stall per 250 square feet. Further, the development code requires 1 trailer loading stall for
each dock door proposed. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 469 auto parking stalls and 184
trailer loading stalls for Building 1, and 268 auto parking stalls and 91 trailer loading stalls for Building 2. The
table below demonstrates the project’s compliance with all parking standards:
Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Complies?
Warehouse/storage
and office
1 per 1,000 sf for the first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf
for the next 20,000 sf, and
1 per 4,000 sf for
remaining sf
Office requires 1 per 250
sf
Building 1:
469 stalls;
Building 2:
268 stalls
Building 1:
478; Building
2: 268
YES
Trailer Loading
Stalls 1 per loading dock
Building 1:
184;
Building 2:
91
Building 1:
221; Building
2: 91
YES
Alternative Rail Serve Plan: As the project site is bounded to the north and east by an existing rail spur, the
project is required to demonstrate that rail service is possible pursuant to Development Code Section
17.36.040.D.6 which was in effect prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982. The applicant is not required to
75 feet (1-foot increment
from the front setback
line)
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)50-60%Building 1: 59.2%; Building 2: 57.8%YES
Front Building
Setback
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street)
Building 1: ~118 feet
(4th Street); Building 2: ~215 feet (6th Street) YES
Street Side
Setback
25 Feet (Catherine bridge
Place)
Building 1: ~185 feet;
Building 2: ~93 feet YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
45 feet (4th Street);
35 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Catherine Bridge
Place)
45 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Catherine Bridge Place)
YES
Parking Setback
25 feet (4th Street);
20 feet (6th Street);
15 feet (Catherine Bridge
Place)
46 feet (4th Street);
~72 feet (6th Street);
25 feet (Catherine Bridge Place)
YES
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet Building 1: 136 feet
Building 2: 45 feet YES
Rear Yard
Setback Min. 0 feet Building 1: 77 feet
Building 2: ~90 feet YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10%10%YES
Page 968
Page 5 of 10
9
3
1
construct rail-related improvements on the property; however, the plans must demonstrate that the site could
have a functional/practical rail service if any future owner/tenant decides that rail service is required/desired.
Accordingly, the applicant has provided an Alternative Rail Serve Plan (Sheet A1-5P of the attached plan set).
The applicant’s Alternative Rail Serve Plan demonstrates that both buildings can accommodate rail pursuant to
Development Code standards in effect at the time the application was deemed complete.
Traffic Improvements: As a result of the proposed project, certain improvements are required to improve traffic
circulation adjacent to the site, as well as in the vicinity of the SEIQ. In addition to the new north-south street
proposed along the easterly property line of the site which will connect 4th Street and 6th Street, additional traffic
related public improvements have been included in the development agreement consisting of minor traffic signal
modifications, signal timing, and pavement restriping improvements at the I-15 and 4th Street Interchange and
signal timing updates along Foothill Boulevard from East Avenue to I-15 to improve operations at the intersection
of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
Entitlements for Proposed Development: The project requires a General Plan Amendment, a Zoning Map
Amendment, a Tentative Parcel Map, a Design Review and a Tree Removal Permit. Further, the applicant
proposes to enter into a Development Agreement with the City, which requires the review and approval of an
ordinance by the City Council. Lastly, the applicant is also requesting the approval of a Minor Use Permit in
anticipation of the building being utilized as a Large Distribution/Fulfillment Center.
General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213): Currently, the general plan land use designation across the project
site is split between General Industrial (GI) and Heavy Industrial (HI). The applicant has applied for a General
Plan Amendment to redesignate the general plan land use of the entire project site as General Industrial (GI),
thereby eliminating the HI land use designation from the project area. Staff notes that the City is currently
processing a comprehensive general plan update, known as “PlanRC.” It is presently anticipated that this general
plan update will redesignate this site as “Industrial Employment,” a land use designation which is intended to
facilitate the heaviest industrial uses permitted within the City, including but not limited to, large distribution and
logistics facilities, certain types of e-commerce uses and other uses which are similar to those currently permitted
within the Heavy Industrial (HI) land use designation. However, the proposed GI designation currently allows for
the potential warehouse uses proposed for the Project site, including large distribution/fulfillment centers.
Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the General Plan, as amended by the proposed application.
Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267): Similar to the split land use designation, the site is also split
between the Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment (IE) zoning districts. As noted previously, prior to the
adoption of Ordinance 982, the Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment districts were referred to as the
General Industrial and Heavy Industrial districts, respectively. The applicant has requested that the project area
be re-zoned to the NI District, which is similar to the GI zoning district in place prior to the adoption of Ordinance
982. Given that the NI zoning district is consistent with the prior GI zoning district and allows a similar range of
uses, the proposed new NI zoning would be consistent with the General Plan, as amended to reflect a GI land
use designation throughout the site.
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271): As mentioned, the project includes a request to approve a Tentative
Parcel Map to consolidate the two existing parcels within the project area and subdivide them into two new lots,
Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. Parcel 1 proposes an area of approximately 55 acres with street frontage along 4th Street
and Catherine Bridge Place and Parcel 2 proposes an area of approximately 30 acres with street frontage along
6th Street and Catherine Bridge Place. Staff has reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map and has determined that it
complies with the relevant development standards, subject to certain conditions of approval.
Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-00266): Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.16.080 as written prior to
the adoption of Ordinance 982, a tree removal permit is required to permit the removal of a heritage tree which
meets at least one of the following criteria:
1. All eucalyptus windrows; or
Page 969
Page 6 of 10
9
3
1
2. Any tree in excess of 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) of 20
inches or more as measured 4 ½ feet from ground level; or
3. Multi-trunk trees having a total diameter at breast height (DBH) of 30 inches or more as measured 4 ½
feet from ground level; or
4. A stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival; or
5. Any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the planning director because of
age, size, condition, location or aesthetic qualities.
589 trees exist onsite which include 125 heritage trees. The project will result in the removal of 464 non-heritage
trees and 101 heritage trees. Thus, a tree removal permit is required. 24 existing heritage trees will remain in
place. In addition to these heritage trees remaining in place, and pursuant to tree replacement requirements
established in the Development Code, the project will also result in 712 onsite trees, including 229 new street
trees and 107 replacement heritage trees.
Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315): While the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative
Parcel Map, Design Review and Tree Removal Permit are exempt from Ordinance 982, these applications did
not address the potential uses/tenants for the project because the project is being building on a speculative
basis. Therefore, no pending use permit application was deemed complete prior to the effective date of
Ordinance 982, and future uses by tenants who occupy the building will be subject to new standards under
Ordinance 982. Thus, the applicant is requesting the review and approval of a Minor Use Permit subject to
Development Code Section Table 17.30.030-1 as amended by Ordinance 982, in order to attract a new tenant
under the use classification of a “Large Distribution/Fulfillment Center.” Development Code Section
17.32.020.G.3 (modified as part of Ordinance 982) classifies Large Distribution Fulfillment Centers as “E-
Commerce Distribution” and provides the following definition(s) for this use:
E-Commerce Distribution. Activities that involve the buying, selling, and distribution of products and
associated services over the internet or through mobile applications. Products are transported using freight
trucks and stored in warehouses or fulfillment centers to then be distributed to designated shipping
locations using delivery trucks. Includes the following categories of e-commerce distribution.
a. Distribution/Fulfillment Center. A fulfilment center or similar use’s primary purpose is storage
and distribution (non-sort) of e-commerce products to consumers or end-users, either directly or
through a parcel hub. These facilities shall have a minimum ceiling height of 24 feet.
1.Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large. A distribution/fulfillment center with a minimum
gross floor area over 50,000 square feet.
Pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 as amended by Ordinance 982 requires a Minor Use Permit for Large Distribution
Fulfillment Centers.
Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180): The developer has proposed to enter into a Development
Agreement with the city. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.060.A.1, development agreements:
1. Increase the certainty in the approval of development projects, thereby preventing the waste of
resources, reducing the cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging investment in and
commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum efficient utilization of resources at
the least economic cost to the public;
2. Provide assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the
applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and
subject to conditions of approval thereby strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private
participation in comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development;
Page 970
Page 7 of 10
9
3
1
3. Enable the city to plan for and finance public facilities, including but not limited to, streets, sewerage,
transportation, drinking water, school and utility facilities, thereby removing a serious impediment to the
development of new housing.
The proposed Development Agreement (hereafter referred to as the “Agreement”), includes, but is not limited
to, the following major terms which are summarized below:
The term of the development agreement would initially be six years, with an option for the applicant to
extend the term by nine years upon payment of $2 million.
A requirement for future tenants to designate Rancho Cucamonga as the point of sale for the material
handling equipment used in Project’s operations;
A requirement that the developer shall pay a “Community Benefit Fee,” in order to address the Project’s
expected impacts on affordable housing demand, future greenhouse gas emissions, fire protection
services, environmental justice and related impacts typically associated with large warehouse
development. The amount of the Community Benefit Fee to be paid by the developer totals $9 million
dollars paid to the city in four installments up to the fifth year of operations of Buildings 1 and 2, with
the first installment of $3 million to be paid when grading permits are pulled. The applicant may receive
a refund of up to $3 million if a project tenant generates a certain amount of sales tax to the City;
A requirement that the developer complete certain traffic improvements involving improvements to
signal timing and restriping and pay a “Fair Share” contribution to the City’s Industrial Area Traffic
Improvement fund in the amount of $37,089;
A requirement that the developer will pay for, and construct to city standards, a new public street
(”Catherine Bridge Place”) along the east side of the project site, which will run north-south and connect
4th Street and 6th Street;
A requirement that the developer will contribute $1 million as an in-lieu fee, and work in good faith to
assist the city in obtaining approval from the California Public Utilities Commission to permit and
construct an At-Grade crossing at 6th Street;
Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Williams, Oaxaca, and Smith) reviewed the project
on April 20, 2021. No members of the public attended the meeting to speak on the item, and the Design Review
Committee recommended that the item be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented.
Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement provided in Chapter 17.124 of the Development
Code. As an industrial development, this project would typically include artwork that has a minimum value that
meets or exceeds one dollar per square foot. While the valuation to satisfy the public art requirement would be
approximately $2,175,000 (as it is based on square footage of the project), staff notes that pursuant to the
proposed development agreement, all but $200,000 of this amount will be transferred to the proposed community
benefit fee. As a condition of approval for the project, the applicant shall be required to install art on-site at a
minimum value of $200,000, pursuant to Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code.
Fiscal Impact Analysis: The applicant has provided a Fiscal Impact Analysis (Kosmont, 2020, rev. 2021), which
estimates that the subject project would produce approximately 1,678 jobs. Further, this analysis anticipates that
the project would result in estimated annual General Fund revenues of $599,500. Accounting for anticipated
general fund expenditures related to the project of $196,800, the estimated net fiscal impact to the City is
anticipated to be approximately $402,700 annually. To offset any impacts on the project’s impacts to affordable
housing demand, the developer and the City have negotiated the development agreement discussed above
which provides revenue intended to offset any adverse fiscal impacts of the project.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.
2020100056), has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to inform the public
Page 971
Page 8 of 10
9
3
1
about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen
the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. The contents of the EIR become a planning
tool for the Planning Commission and City Council to use in determining the appropriate and best land use for
the project site.
The intent of this EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed project and
identify feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts.
A summary of all of the project-related impacts and the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the
Final EIR. The following summarizes key points in the environmental review process:
Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting: The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as public notification
that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested
parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA
recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purpose of identifying the range of potential significant
impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping meeting is to receive
public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as it relates to the project
and environment.
Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting was prepared for the project and
circulated on October 2, 2020 to the State Clearinghouse (SCH No. 2020100056), public agencies, Native
American tribes, those interested parties who had previously requested notification and all property owners within
660 feet of the subject site. The notice advertising the NOP and the public scoping meeting was also published
in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on October 2, 2020 and made publicly available on the city’s website. the Public
Scoping Meeting was held virtually over Zoom on October 15, 2020. No members of the public or any interested
party provided comments at the Public Scoping Meeting. The public comment period to respond to the NOP
closed on November 2, 2020 and comment letters were received from California Department of Fish and Wildlife,
California Department of Transportation, Native American Heritage Commission, Southcoast Air Quality
Management District, and Inland Empire Biking Alliance. Written responses to all significant environmental
issues raised were prepared and made available in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).
AB 52 and SB 18 Compliance: Notification in accordance with AB 52 was sent on July 20, 2021, to tribal
communities from a list of six tribes that have required notification by the city. Notification in accordance with SB
18 was sent out to twelve tribal communities on August 24, 2020. One tribe (Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians
– Kizh Nation) requested consultation. In response to this request, staff held a conference call with the tribe on
November 4, 2020, at which point representatives of this tribe requested that mitigation measures be included
in the CEQA document requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving activities. Additional comments
were provided by Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation in writing which have been included as
mitigations. In addition to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, the San Manuel Band of Mission
Indians (SMBMI) also responded with comments though they did not request consultation. Rather the SMBMI
provided language which they requested “be made a part of the project/permit/plan conditions.” Accordingly,
language from SMBMI has been incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).
Thus, the CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures.
Draft EIR Preparation and Circulation: Following the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting, a DEIR was prepared
and was distributed to all Responsible and Trustee agencies, and individuals who had requested to review the
DEIR. The DEIR was distributed for a 45-day public review period on May 7, 2021 with the comment period
concluding on June 21, 2021. A Notice of Availability including electronic links to the DEIR and all technical
appendices was posted at the County, published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, mailed to all property owners
within 660 feet, interested parties requesting such notification and posted on the city’s website on May 7, 2021.
Further, and also on May 7, 2021, the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided to the Office of Planning
Page 972
Page 9 of 10
9
3
1
and Research via the online “CEQAnet” portal for distribution to Responsible and Trustee agencies and hard
copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public review at the following locations:
Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730;
Paul A Biane Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739;
Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730.
Comments were received from Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, Attorneys at Law, on behalf of California’s
Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARECA),” the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and from an
individual resident, Mark Rush. Written responses to all significant environmental issues raised were prepared
and made available in the Final EIR (FEIR). Staff notes that two additional comment letters were received from
Blum Collins, Attorneys at Law, on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and Mitchell Tsai,
Attorney at Law, on behalf of Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters. Both of these letters were withdrawn
by the commenters, with each noting that the Project developer had sufficiently addressed their concerns. These
comment letters, responses to comments and the commenter’s withdrawal letters are included with this staff
report as Exhibits 7 and 8.
The administrative DEIR and FEIR are included with this staff report as Exhibits 3 and 4. Technical appendices
and supporting documentation can be referenced on the City‘s website under the tab ”CEQA Documents
Available for Review“ under the Current Projects & Planning Initiatives which can be accessed here:
https://www.cityofrc.us/community-development/planning
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP): In compliance with CEQA, a monitoring program has been
prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted mitigation measure or project design
feature that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing
milestones for each mitigation measure.
Findings of Fact in Support of Determinations Related to Significant Environmental Impacts: The EIR concludes
that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the
project would remain less than significant. No significant and unavoidable impact was identified; thus, it is
determined that no Statement of Overriding Consideration is required to be adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE:
A notice of public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet of the subject property, the site
was posted, and a notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on September 8,
2021. In addition to the comments received as part of the CEQA process, staff also received one phone call from
an individual who owns property near the project site who expressed clarification on the location and scope of
the project, and expressed general concerns about traffic. No other comments or correspondence have been
received in response to these notices as of the writing of this report.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing and
anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the city with new industrial
warehouse facilities which will attract quality tenants, the project also results in the construction of a new public
street which will improve circulation in the SEIQ by providing an additional north-south connection between 4th
and 6th Streets. The development of the project will also aide in facilitating the completion of an east-west at-
grade crossing at 6th Street, thereby also improving east-west access throughout the SEIQ.
Page 973
Page 10 of 10
9
3
1
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Exhibit B - Project Plans
Exhibit C - Draft EIR
Exhibit D - Final EIR
Exhibit E - EIR Findings
Exhibit F - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit G - Blum Collins Comments, Responses, and Withdrawal Letter
Exhibit H - Mitchell Tsai Letter Comments, Responses and Withdrawal Letter
Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Comments
Exhibit J - Planning Commission Resolution General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00213
Exhibit K - Planning Commission Resolution Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267
Exhibit L - Planning Commission Resolution Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271
Exhibit M - Planning Commission Resolution Design Review DRC2020-00202
Exhibit N - Planning Commission Resolution Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266
Exhibit O - Planning Commission Resolution Minor Use Permit DRC2021-00315
Exhibit P - Planning Commission Resolution Development Agreement DRC2021-00180 and Draft Development
Agreement
Page 974
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission Regular Meeting
AGENDA
September 22, 2021
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on
September 22, 2021. The meeting was called to order by Chair Oaxaca at 7:02 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chair Oaxaca, Vice Chair Dopp, Commissioner Guglielmo,
Commissioner Morales and Commissioner Williams.
Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Acting Planning Director;
Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Sean McPherson,
Senior Planner; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner.
B. Public Communications
Chair Oaxaca opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public
communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2021.
Motion by Commissioner Guglielmo, second by Commissioner Williams to approve Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote.
D. Public Hearings
D1. LOCATED AT 12322 and 12434 4th Street – BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
LLC – Recommendation to the City Council for a General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-
00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267), Tentative Parcel Map
(SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-
00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development Agreement (DRC2021-
00180) to allow for the development of two industrial warehouse buildings on certain
property located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west
of Etiwanda Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street; APNS: 0229-283-50 and
51. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2020100056) was prepared for the project.
Primary Case File No. DRC2020-00202.
Page 975
HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES – September 22, 2021
Page 2 of 5
Draft
Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation
(copy on file). He noted a clerical error on the Resolution for the Tree Removal Permit. It indicates
589 trees and 125 Heritage Trees. It is a total of 589, including the Heritage Trees.
Chair Oaxaca asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing Item.
Commissioner Morales asked about truck queuing issues. If it becomes a problem backing up onto 4th
Street, could it be a Condition of Approval on how to manage and direct queuing, so it does not create
traffic.
Sean McPherson answered the project is exempt from the provision of Ordinance 982, which would
require certain projects of this size to include parking management/circulation plans. He said in this
case, as the project is exempt, there was no management plan required. What the developer has
proposed is a queuing lane off Catherine Bridge Place for proper queuing on site.
Commissioner Morales asked if there will be trucking station for electric vehicles on site.
Sean McPherson responded the loading areas will be required to be equipped with EV charging ports.
Commissioner Oaxaca asked where the crossing on 6th Street will be. Is it relevant to the project.
Sean McPherson explained the northern portion of the site borders 6th Street. Currently, there are white
gates that block that road, and 6th Street is not complete. He said terms of the Development Agreement
require the developer to contribute $1 Million dollars toward its completion and work in good faith with
California Public Utilities Commission and the City to assure that segment on 6th Street will be complete.
Vice Chair Dopp asked regarding the solar panels to what extent is it going to fulfill electricity demands
that we are anticipating.
Sean McPherson answered in terms of the project working towards meeting those expectations, the
installation of solar is anticipated for this project despite being exempt from Ordinance 982 in order to a
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and so forth.
Vice Chair Dopp asked about the sales tax that is currently conditioned, we do not get a lot of sales tax
revenue from this type of project. Is that correct.
Sean McPherson explained the community benefit fee. This project would create certain impacts. For
example, it would create jobs that would not be very high-paying, which will exacerbate the jobs-housing
imbalance. Also, staff noted that the 1,678 jobs listed in the staff report are construction jobs. It is
anticipated that the project will result in approximately 1,470 long-term jobs. In order to anticipate that
potential impact and how it might affect affordable housing in the City, the developer has agreed to pay
a Community Benefit Fee. Going beyond the notion of sales tax, the community benefit fee could pay
toward offsetting impacts now. The applicant/developer also agreed that future tenants would have to
purchase equipment to run in the building. Future tenants would have to designate the City as the point
of sale of that equipment in order to obtain some sales tax.
Vice Chair Dopp asked about the EIR, greenhouse gases, air quality. He said there is a general
perception out there when starting a project, anticipating 275 truck stalls, that there is going to be
significant emission impact to the Community. Is there a way to reconcile some of the fears people have
against the data.
Page 976
HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES – September 22, 2021
Page 3 of 5
Draft
Sean McPherson explained one thing that is important to consider is the square footage 2.1 million sq.
ft. Worth noting in terms of potential impacts is that the property is currently already improved with a 1.4
million sq. ft. building. In effect, the aggregate increase of sq. footage is not that full 2.1 million sq ft. but
rather 750 thousand sq. ft. As a result of the EIR analysis, a whole host of mitigation measures were
identified in order to bring the threshold of all impacts, including air quality impact emissions, to acceptable
levels.
Commissioner Morales mentioned on the development agreement it says it could be extended an
additional 9 years for additional payment. He asked to explain why it would be extended an additional 9
years.
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained that developers and cities negotiate development agreements
because they provide benefits to the city, but they provide best advice to develop under the current
ordinances in place at the time the development agreement is entered into. It provides certainty about
land use regulations that are applied to the project during the term of the development agreement. A
developer will typically want out, along with possible development agreement because it provides
uncertainty about what rules will apply to their property and development its uses over that time. That is
why the applicant may want to extend the development agreement after that 6th year.
With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chair Oaxaca opened public hearing.
Heather Crossner, Applicant, presented a PowerPoint slideshow on the Project Overview.
Commissioner Morales has concerns about truck queuing. Asked if they had any idea what it would look
like.
Heather Crossner responded there is one queuing space for every 10 loading docks. They have 275
loading docks, which require 27 queuing spaces. They have way more on site because it’s so large. She
said they far exceed queuing requirements.
Vice Chair Dopp asked who the tenant might be.
Heather Crossner responded they do not have a tenant. Does not happen until after construction. Too
early in the process.
The following persons commented in favor of the project: Randy Wetman, Samuel Nieto, Desiree
Vincente, Bill Quisenberry, Thomas Ruiz, Delshawn McClellon, Oscar Delcid, David Hanson, Sean
Silva, Louie Lopez, George Rivera, Zach Strasters.
Mark Rush, Resident, expressed environmental concerns.
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation of the
agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted: The actual correspondence should be
referred to for details:
• Email received from Rudy Zeledon, City of Ontario, Planning Director, requesting a need for a
hydrology study and encroachment permit.
• Email received from Aiden Marshall, Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, Notice of Settlement.
With no further comments from the Public, Chair Oaxaca closed public hearing.
Page 977
HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES – September 22, 2021
Page 4 of 5
Draft
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned that in compliance with all the mitigation measures, the EIR,
Conditions of Approval, and as required by the Development Agreement, the project will be required to
comply with water efficient landscaping. He said the City has a water efficient landscaping ordinance
that does require compliance with a particular water budget for the project.
Commissioner Morales stated it appears a lot of good work went into this project. It’s good for the city.
Expressed he is in support of the project.
Vice Chair Dopp mentioned the environment means a lot and that all of our environmental people, who
submitted letters, spoke in favor of the project. That really says something. Overall, this is something
that will be great for our Community.
Commissioner Williams complimented staff for putting this together. She said the design is nicely done
and she is eager to see it. In full support of it.
Commissioner Guglielmo thanked staff for their diligent report and detail that went into this project. It
does make their analysis much easier when seeing a lot of people come out and support a project like
this. He really does hope it gets off the ground and is in support of recommending to City Council.
Chair Oaxaca stated that with a project like this, “sustainability” takes on a much broader meaning. The
support of this project has been expressed to us this evening. He believes when this project is
complete, it will be a model what an industrial development should look like in the city moving forward.
Motion by Vice Chair Dopp, second by Commissioner Williams to adopt the proposed Resolutions and
recommend to City Council for final action; 21-57 General Plan Map Amendment DRC2020-00213; 21-
58 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2020-00267; 21-59 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20271; 21-60
Design Review DRC2020-00202; 21-61 Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00266; 21-62 Minor Use
Permit DRC2021-00315; 21-63; Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0 vote. Recommending to City Council for final action.
E. General Business
E1. Findings of General Plan Conformity for Real Property Acquisition of Approximately 1.10
Acres Located at the Southwest Corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Avenue; APN:
0208-151-24.
David Eoff, Senior Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on
file).
Chair Oaxaca asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this item.
Commissioner Guglielmo mentioned this is obviously a very old structure and asked if there is anything
that designates it historic or if there are any concerns with the removal for affordable housing.
David Eoff answered that the historical analysis of the structure and site will be part of the next step of
the process when an application or project is proposed. He said the removal of the structure or
restoration of the structure is part of the CEQA analysis when a project is presented.
Vice Chair Dopp stated from our presentation of City Council Goals, does this strategic property fall
under that specific provision.
David Eoff answered yes.
Page 978
HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES – September 22, 2021
Page 5 of 5
Draft
Commissioners concur and are in favor of the project.
Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Guglielmo to approve proposed
Resolution 21-56 Findings of General Plan Conformity. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote.
F. Director Announcements
Acting Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura announced the General Plan EIR is currently available online
for review and comment. Comments are being accepted on the EIR through October 25, 2021 and there is
an informational video on the website that explains more about the EIR and its conclusions.
G. Commission Announcements - None
H. Adjournment
Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Guglielmo to adjourn the meeting, motion
carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m.
Page 979
2021-10-20 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G1. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL - VIA STAFF EMAIL
City Council
October 20, 2021
Primary Case No: DRC2020-00202
Project Background
•Who:Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga,LLC (applicant and property
owner);
•What:Redevelopment of site with two new industrial buildings totaling
approximately 2,175,000 square feet ;
•Where:12322 and 12434 4th Street (APNs:0229-283-51 and 51);
•Zoning/Land Use:Property currently split between various land uses
and zoning districts.
Project Background (cont.)
•September 22,2021 –Planning Commission holds public
hearing to consider item.After receiving public testimony,
commission raised questions regarding:
•Environmental impacts;
•Availability/potential for electric vehicle charging stations and solar;
•The completion of the 6th Street At -Grade crossing;
•Community Benefit Fee and anticipated sales tax generated;
After considering staff’s responses and delinerating on the item,
Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council
approve the project.
Santa Anita AvenueEtiwanda Avenue6th Street
4th Street
Project Overview
Current Zoning: Neo-Industrial (NI)
and Industrial Employment (IE).
Proposed Zoning: Neo-Industrial (NI)
NI
IE
Current Land Use: General Industrial
and Heavy Industrial.
Proposed Land Use: General Industrial HI
GI
Proposed Project
•Redesignate entire project area to General Industrial Land UsedesignationandNeo-Industrial (NI)Zoning District;
•Demolish existing improvements,subdivide into two new parcels andredevelopsitefortwonewindustrialbuildingstooperateasa“LargeDistributionFulfillmentCenter,”(speculative,no tenant identified);
•New street to be constructed,named in honor of Catherine Vail Bridge;
•Entitlements include:
•General Plan Amendment
•Zoning Map Amendment
•Tentative Parcel Map
•Design Review
•Tree Removal Permit
•Minor Use Permit
•Development Agreement
Building 1:
1,422,500 square feet
Building 2:
752,500 square feet
Renderings –Building 1
Renderings –Building 2
Development Agreement
Development Code Section 17.22.060,the use of development agreements is
beneficial to the public in a number of ways .
•6-year term,could be extended an additional 9 years upon payment of $2
million;
•Future tenants shall designate the City as point of sale for operations
equipment;
•Developer to pay “Community Benefit Fee”totaling approximately $9 million
over 5 years of operation;
•Developer to complete,at their expense,traffic improvements including
construction of Catherine Bridge Place,restriping and signal timing and payment
of Fair Share contribution toward Industrial Area Traffic Improvement Fund
(improved circulation);
•Developer to contribute $1 million as an in-lieu fee and work in cooperation
with the City in obtaining approval from CPUC for 6th Street At -Grade crossing.
Public Art
•Project is subject to public art requirement pursuant to
Development Code Section 17.124 and as a condition of
approval and pursuant to development agreement,art
valued at a minimum $200,000 shall be installed onsite.
Design Review Committee
•Design Review Committee reviewed the project on April 20,
2021 and recommended that the project be forwarded to
the Planning Commission as presented.
Environmental Review
•Environmental Impact Report (EIR)prepared for project (State ClearingHouseNo.2020100056).Notice of Preparation (NOP)circulated onOctober2,2020,Scoping Meeting held on October 15,2020,andcommentperiodclosedonNovember2,2020;
•Draft EIR made available for 45-day public review on May 7,2021,concluding on June 21,2021.Various comments received which havebeenaddressedintheFinalEIR;
•Upon implementation of the project and all mitigation measures,impacts associated with the project will remain less than significant.NoStatementofOverridingConsiderationsisnecessary.
•AB 52 and SB 18 notices mailed to tribal governments.Two tribesrespondedandconcernshavebeenincorporatedintoMitigationMonitoringandReportingProgram.
Noticing
•Notices mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet as
well as various agencies (148 mailers),published in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the site was posted on
October 6,2021;
•To date,staff has received one inquiry from OmniTrans.The
following condition of approval is proposed:
Noticing (cont.)
•In response to OmniTrans comment,staff recommends the
following condition of approval:
“The developer shall construct a new bus shelter at the existing bus stop along the
project frontage on 4th Street to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.The
design of the bus shelter shall be consistent with the design of the project.The
developer shall also evaluate the existing bus stop along 4th street,located at the
easterly frontage of the project,for conformance to current ADA regulations.If the
bus stop does not meet current ADA regulations,then the developer shall be
responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the bus stop pad for
compliance.Design shall be completed,and improvements secured for prior to
issuance of a Building permit.The reconstruction along with all public
improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy.”
Recommendation
•Staff recommends that the City Council:
•Certify the EIR;
•Adopt the MMRP;
•Approve the project through Resolutions attached to
staff report.