Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-111 - Resolution
RESOLUTION NO, 2021-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH No. 2020100066) PREPARED FOR THE BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC PROJECT WHICH PROPOSES THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2,175,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIAMTELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF SANTA ANITA, AVENUE AND 2,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF 4T" STREET AND SOUTH OF 6T" STREET—APNS: 0229-283-50 AND 61, MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM A. Recitals. 1. Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC filed a development application for General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00213), Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2020-00267), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20271), Design Review (DRC2020-00202), Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-00266), Minor Use Permit (DRC2021-00315) and Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180) for a development project as described in the title of this Resolution (collectively, the"Project"). 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City concluded that there was substantial evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact on several resources and determined that an EIR must be prepared for the Project in order to analyze the Project's potential impacts on the environment. 3. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082, on October 2, 2020, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR for the Project, and circulated the NOP and initial study to the Office of Planning and Research, the County Clerk, responsible and trustee agencies, governmental agencies, organizations, and persons who may be interested in the application for a 30-day public review period. 4. The City received comments from California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Transportation, Native American Heritage Commission, Southcoast Air Quality Management District, and Inland Empire Biking Alliance in response to the NOP. 5. After providing notice to the required tribes under AB 52 and SB 18, the City initiated consultation with one tribe in the area, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation, and comments were also received from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, in accordance with the City's obligations under AB 52 and SB 18. 6. The City released the Draft EIR for a 45-day public review period beginning May 7, 2021 and ending on June 21, 2021. During the public review period the City received a total of 3 comment letters on the Draft EIR that required responses, and the City has prepared responses to each comment. Resolution No. 2021-111 —Page 1 of 4 I 7. The EIR concludes that with the inclusion of mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant impact on any environmental resources. 8. The City prepared a Final EIR in accordance with CEQA, which contains the City's responses to comments, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)for the Project, the Draft EIR as modified by the Final EIR, and all appendices. 9. On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider recommending the Project to the City Council for final consideration and concluded the hearing on that date. 10. On October 20, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project and concluded the hearing on that date. 11. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Findings. Based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR, together with its appendices, and all other available evidence presented to the City Council during the above referenced public hearing on October 20, 2021, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, and upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded due notice and an opportunity to comment on the EIR and the Project. b. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving',the Project, make one or more of the following written findings for each significant effect identified in the Final EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: i. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR; ii. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or iii. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Resolution No. 2021-111 —Page 2 of 4 These required findings are set forth in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. C. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section 111.13 of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. d. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant, but that can be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation, are described in Section III.0 of Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. e. No environmental impacts were identified in the Final EIR as significant and unavoidable despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, and a statement further confirming this conclusion is provided in Section I of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. f. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to assure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project. g. Prior to taking action on the Final EIR and approving the Project, the City Council specifically finds and certifies that: (1) the Final EIR was presented to the City Council; (2) the City Council reviewed and considered the Final EIR and all of the information and data in the administrative record, and all oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings; (3) the Final EIR is adequate and has been completed in full compliance with CEQA; and (4)the Final EIR reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. h. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information requiring additional recirculation or additional environmental review of the Project under CEQA. 3. Determination. On the basis of the foregoing and all of the evidence in the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR, adopts findings pursuant to the CEQA as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Location of Record. The documents and other materials, including the staff reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, and specifications, that constitute the record on which this Resolution is based are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. All such documents are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2021-111 — Page 3 of 4 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of October 2021. nis ichael, May r ATTEST: nice C. Reynolds, ity Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 20th day of October 2021. AYES: Hutchison, Michael, Scott, Spagnolo NOES: None ABSENT: Kennedy ABSTAINED: None Executed this 21st day of October, 2021, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ice C. Reynolds, dhy Clerk Resolution No. 2021-111 — Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CEQA Guidelines Sections 15090,15091 and 15093 For BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No.2020100056) Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga I. INTRODUCTION The following findings of fact are based in part on the information contained in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report("EIR")for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project("Project"), as well as additional facts found in the complete record of proceedings. The EIR is hereby incorporated by reference and is available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (10500 Civic Center Drive) and on the City's website: https://www.Cityofrc.us/community-development/planning Public Resources Code Section 21002 provides that"public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]" The same statute provides that the procedures required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) "are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to provide that"in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures,individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof." The mandate and principles announced in Public Resources Code section 21002 are implemented, in part, through the requirement that agencies must adopt findings before approving projects for which EIRs are required. For each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a project,the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three permissible conclusions. Specifically, Section 15091(a)of the CEQA guidelines states: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. Public Resources Code section 21061.1 defines"feasible"to mean"capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, legal, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Bd. of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta I]).) For purposes of these Findings(including the table described below),the term"avoid"refers to the effectiveness of one or more mitigation measures to reduce an otherwise potentially significant effect to a less than significant level. Although CEQA Guidelines section 15091 requires only that approving agencies specify that a particular significant effect is "avoid[ed] or substantially lessen[ed],"these Findings, for purposes of clarity, in each case will specify whether the effect in question has been"avoided"(i.e.,reduced to a less than significant level). Wi h respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The EIR for the Project concluded the Project would not result in any sig' ificant d unavoidable impacts;thus,a Statement of Overriding Considerations is not required for', he Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project. Zise Findings constitute the City's best efforts to set forth the evidentiary and policy bases for its sion to approve the Project in a manner consistent with the requirements of CEQA. To the ext' nt that these Findings conclude that various mitigation measures outlined in the Final EIR are feasible and have not been modified, superseded or withdrawn, the City hereby binds itself to implement these measures as measures built into the design of the Project itself or as conditions of Project approval. (See Public Resources Code § 21081.6, subd. (b); Guidelines, § 15126.4, subd. (a)(2).) These Findings, in other words, are not merely informational, but rather constitute a binding set of obligations that will come into effect when the City Council adopts a resolution approving the Project. In addition, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the Project, and is being approved by the City Council by the same Resolution that has adopted these Findings. The City will use the MMRP to track compliance with Project mitigation measures. The MMRP will remain available for public review during the compliance period. The Final MMRP is attached to and incorporated into the EIR certification resolution and is approved in conjunction with certification of the EIR and adoption of these Findings of Fact. In the event of any conflict 2 between these Findings and the MMRP with respect to the requirements of an adopted mitigation measure,the more stringent measure shall control. II. FINDINGS CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT When approving a project for which an EIR has been prepared, the lead agency must certify that the EIR complies with CEQA, that the EIR reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis, and that the EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the lead agency, which reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR before approving the project.(Public Resources Code §21082.1, subd. (c); Guidelines, § 15090, subd. (a).) The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby finds,determines and certifies that the EIR complies with CEQA, for reasons explained in the entire record of proceedings, including but not limited to the EIR itself, staff reports, oral testimony, and technical studies. The Council hereby finds, determines and certifies that that City Staff has reviewed the EIR as has an independent CEQA consultant under contract to the City and the EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. The Council also hereby finds, determines and certifies that the EIR was presented to the Council, and that the Council reviewed and considered the information in the draft and final EIR before approving the Project. III. FINDINGS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT In compliance with Section 15201 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has taken steps to provide opportunities for public participation in the environmental review process.A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed on October 2, 2020, to potential Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, and other interested parties for a 30-day public review period to solicit comments and to inform agencies and the public of the Project. The Project was described; potential environmental effects associated with Project implementation were identified; and agencies and the public were invited to review and comment on the NOR The City received five responses to the NOP after the end of the scoping period. Table 2-1 of the Draft EIR summarizes the NOP comments addressing environmental and related issues. Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a virtual scoping meeting for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Draft EIR on October 15, 2020. The public scoping meeting was held virtually in accordance with San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements in effect at the time. In addition to City staff and Project Applicant representatives,the meeting was attended by two members of the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA). The LIUNA members indicated support for the Project. No comments on the scope of the Draft EIR were raised at the public scoping meeting. Based on the NOP, and on public comments received during scoping, the City identified environmental issues for which the Project would result in no impacts or less than significant impacts,and therefore these issues were not discussed in detail in the EIR.This includes the entirety of the Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Mineral Resources, Public Services, Recreation, and Wildfire topical areas. Refer to Section 6.1, Effects Determined Not to be Significant, for a summary discussion of the environmental effects which were found not to be significant. To address potentially significant environmental effects in the remaining topical areas, an EIR was prepared for this Project in accordance with CEQA, and taking into consideration input received during the EIR scoping process. As required by CEQA, the EIR includes appropriate review, analysis, and mitigation measures for the environmental impacts of the Project. This Final EIR 3 could be utilized by other permitting agencies in their capacity as Responsible and Trustee agencies under CEQA. A Draft EIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period,beginning on May 7, 2021, and concluding on June 21, 2021. The Notice of Availability advertising the electronic location and availability of the Draft EIR was provided to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research via the CEQAnet Web Portal for distribution to relevant State agencies;published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin; mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site; mailed to all responsible agencies, individuals and stakeholders who had requested notification; and, posted at the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The Draft EIR was also available on the City's website, at City Hall, the Archibald Library, and the Paul A. Biane Library. Three written comment letters from an agency, an organization, and an individual were received on the Draft EIR; one comment letter was received during the public review period and two comment letters were received after the end of the public review period. Responses to these comments, including comments received after the end of the public review period, were prepared and are included in the Final EIR.It should be noted that the existence of differing opinions arising from the same pool of information is not a basis for finding the EIR to be inadequate; when approving an EIR,an agency need not correctly resolve a dispute among experts about the accuracy of the EIR's environmental forecasts. Additionally, pursuant to Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, responses to comments from a public agency were transmitted 10 days prior to the public hearing for the Project and certification of the Final EIR. Although not required by the CEQA Guidelines, written responses were also provided to other commenters at the same time. For the purposes of CEQA, and the findings herein set forth, the administrative record for the Project consists of those items listed in Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The record of proceedings for the City's decision on the Project consists of the following documents, at a minimum, which are incorporated by reference and made part of the record supporting these Findings: • The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Project; • The Draft EIR for the Project and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference; • All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Draft EIR; • All comments and correspondence submitted to the City during the public comment period on the Draft EIR, in addition to all other timely comments on the Draft EIR; • The Final EIR for the Project,including the Planning and Historic Commission staff report, minutes of the Planning Commission public hearing; City Council staff report;minutes of the City Council public hearing;comments received on the Draft EIR;the City's responses to those comments; technical appendices; and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference; • The mitigation monitoring and reporting program(MMRP)for the Project; • All findings and resolutions adopted by the City in connection with the Project, and all documents cited or referred to therein; 4 • All reports, studies,memoranda,maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the Project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Project; • All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the Project,up through the close of the public hearing; • Any minutes and/or verbatim transcripts of all information sessions, public meetings, and public hearings held by the City in connection with the Project; • Any documentary or other evidence submitted to the City at such information sessions, public meetings and public hearings; • All resolutions adopted by the City regarding the Project, and all staff reports, analyses, and summaries related to the adoption of those resolutions; • The City's General Plan and all updates and related environmental analyses; • Matters of common knowledge to the City,including,but not limited to Federal, State,and local laws and regulations; • The City's Zoning Code; • Any documents expressly cited in these Findings,in addition to those cited above; and • Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision(e). Pursuant to Guidelines Section 15091(e),the administrative record of these proceedings is located and available by appointment for review at 10500 Civic Center Drive, during normal business hours. The custodian of these documents and other materials is the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The City has relied on all of the documents listed above in reaching its decisions on the Project even if not every document was formally presented to the City Council or City Staff as part of the City files generated in connection with the Project. Documents set forth above that are not found in the Project files fall into two categories. The first category includes prior planning or legislative decisions of which the City was aware in approving the Project. (See City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation Commission (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 381, 391-391; Dominey v. Department of Personnel Administration(1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 729, 738, fn. 6.) The second category includes documents that influenced the expert advice provided to City Staff or consultants, who then provided advice to the Planning Commission and the City Council as final decision maker. Such documents form part of the underlying factual basis for the City's decisions relating to approval of the Project.(See Pub.Resources Code, §21167.6,subd.(e)(10);Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council of City of San Jose (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus(1995)33 Cal.AppAth 144, 153, 155.) Based upon the evidence before it,the City finds that the Project will not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts;therefore, a statement of overriding considerations is not required. The EIR's analysis of each topical issue describes applicable Regulatory Requirements (RR)s and Project-specific Mitigation Measures (MMs). These components are described below. 5 • Regulatory Requirements. RRs are based on federal, State, or local regulations or laws that are frequently required independently of CEQA review and also serve to offset or prevent specific impacts. The City may impose additional conditions on the Project during the approval process,as appropriate,including those that are standard to all projects,typical to a project of a particular nature, or specific to the proposal. • Mitigation Measures. Where a potentially significant environmental effect has been identified and is not reduced to a level considered less than significant through the application of RRs, Project-specific MMs have been recommended in accordance with CEQA and are included in the Project's Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The Findings below describe in detail the MMs in the EIR, since these measures prevent or reduce the significance of impacts that the Project would otherwise potentially have on the environment. These Findings refer to RRs to the extent that they are relevant to the City's analysis of environmental effects, but the full text of the RRs is not provided below. For the details of applicable RRs, please see the appropriate text in the EIR, which these Findings incorporate by reference. The Findings below describe numbered impacts (e.g., Impact 1.1) that were analyzed in detail in the EIR. Impacts are presented below in summary form. For a detailed description of impacts, please see the appropriate text of the EIR,which these Findings incorporate by reference.Based on the analysis of impacts in the EIR, the EIR concludes that so significant and unavoidable impacts would result from the Project. A. PROJECT SUMMARY The approximately 91.4 gross acre Project site is located at 12434 4'Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Project site is bounded by 4t' Street to the south (which is also the jurisdictional boundary between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario)and 6''Street to the north, and generally located between Etiwanda Avenue to the east and Santa Anita Avenue to the west. The Project site is located within the City of Rancho Cu among4 Southeast Focus Area,as designated in the General Plan,which is comprised primarily of industrial land uses and is generally bound by I-15 to the west, the City's jurisdictional boilndaries to the east and south,and Foothill Boulevard Focus Area to the north. Th� southern portion of the Project site is currently occupied by a 23,240 square foot (sf) retail building, a 1,431,000-sf warehouse building, and associated facilities. There are existing surface parking lots(auto and truck trailer)and vacant land(previously a vineyard)in the northern portion of the Project site. Big Lots vacated the Project site in February 2020, after which it was marketed for new tenants. Reoccupation of the existing buildings and on-going operations at the site were appropriately assumed for baseline conditions evaluated in the EIR. Geodis occupied the site from October 2020 to May 2021. The Project includes redevelopment of the Project site with two new contemporary warehouse buildings (Buildings 1 and 2) with a combined building area, including the mezzanine space, of approximately 2,175,000 sf consisting of 2,134,000 sf of warehouse uses and 41,000 square feet of ancillary office space. The Project also includes construction of a new public roadway referred to as Street "A", which would extend north-south along the eastern boundary of the Project site between 41 Street and 6`' Street. Additional on-site improvements associated with the Project include,but are not limited to, surface parking areas (automobile and truck trailer spaces ancillary 6 to operation of the two buildings), vehicle drive aisles, landscaping, storm water quality/storage, utility infrastructure, and exterior lighting. In addition to certification of the Project's Final EIR and these Findings of Fact, the Project also involves the following discretionary approvals as described in Section 1.4.4,Required Permits and Discretionary Actions,of the Final EIR: General Plan Amendment,Zoning Map Amendment, Site Plan and Architectural Review,Minor Use Permit,Tentative Parcel Map No.20271,Development Agreement, and Tree Removal Permit. B. FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTS DETERMINED TO HAVE NO IMPACT OR LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITHOUT MITIGATION MEASURES The City agrees with the characterization in the Final EIR with respect to impacts identified as"no impact" or "less than significant impact" and finds that, based upon substantial evidence in the record,as discussed below,the following impacts associated with the Project are not significant or are less than significant,and do not require mitigation,as described in the Final EIR.Under CEQA, no mitigation measures are required for impacts that are less than significant. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21002; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15126.4, subd. (a)(3),- 15091.) Note that impacts are presented below in summary form. For a full description of impacts,see the appropriate text in the EIR,which the Council hereby incorporates by reference into these Findings. 1. Aesthetics Impact LI: The Project,including site-adjacent improvements and the 6th Street at-grade crossing, would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, resulting in a less than significant impact. Further, trees removed by the Project would be replaced in accordance with City's requirements(refer to RR 3-3 and RR 3-4). Impact 1.2: The Project site is not within a State scenic highway and is not in proximity to a State scenic highway. The Project does not have the potential to degrade scenic resources within a State scenic highway and no impacts would occur. Impact 1.3: The Project site is within an urbanized area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As such,the analysis for this threshold is based on the review of the potential for the Project to conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. The Project would not conflict with the applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, including Rancho Cucamonga Development Code standards and General Plan polices. No impact would occur. Impact 1.4: The Project site is located in an urban area, which includes existing sources of light and glare.The Project involves redevelopment of the Project site and would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.Impacts would be less than significant. 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources As identified in the NOP,there is no Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance, forest land, or timberland on or near the Project site. The Project would result in no impacts to agriculture and forestry resources. 7 3. Air Quality Impact 2.3: The Project would not expose sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, workers or school children) to substantial pollutant concentrations, including localized criteria pollutant emissions during construction and operation,mobile source and construction-related diesel particulate matter (DPM)emissions, or carbon monoxide(CO)"Hot Spots". Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 2.4 The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and would adhere to applicable regulatory requirements addressing odor emissions(refer to RR 2-1 and RR 2-5). Impacts would be less than significant. 4. Biological Resources Impact 3.1: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, and 6r' Street at-grade crossing study area consist of two land cover types that would be classified as disturbed and developed. These areas do not support native plant communities, nor do they provide suitable habitat for sensitive plant or wildlife species.Therefore,the Project would not impact Candidate,Sensitive,or Special Status species.No impact would occur. Impact 3.2 & 3.3: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, and 6th Street at-grade crossing study area do not support riparian habitat; United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) jurisdictional areas; wetlands; or, sensitive natural communities. Therefore, no impact would occur. Potential indirect impacts to the ephemeral channel and water det�ntion basin east of the Project site, which are not within the Project's impact limits, would be less than significant with adherence to construction-related water quality protection requirements (outlined in RR 9-1). Impact 3.4: The Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas and 6' Street at-grade crossing study area do not contain known native wildlife nursery sites and are not within a Wildlife Corridor or i nkage. Vegetation and trees on the Project site, site-adjacent improvement areas, 6'" Street at- gra le cros�ing study area, and in the vicinity have the potential to provide suitable nesting op ortuniti$s for avian and raptor species. Compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (M TA) and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, as out ined in RR 3-1 and RR 3-2 would ensure that potential impacts to nesting birds and raptors are les' than significant. Impact 3.5: The Project would result in the removal of heritage trees; however, the removal of any heritage trees would be conducted in compliance with the City's tree protection policies/requirements,as outlined in RR 3-3 and RR 3-4.No impact would occur related to conflict with tree protection policies or ordinances. Impact 3.6: The Project site is not within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Communities Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan area. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted plan and no impacts would occur. 8 5. Cultural Resources Impact 4.1: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Impact 4.3: Construction activities would not disturb known human remains. However, if human remains are encountered in subsurface soils,they would be handled in accordance with applicable State regulations (refer to RR 4-1), which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered.Potential impacts to human remains would be less than significant. 6. Energy Impact 5.1 The Project would adhere to the state-mandated provisions of Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards and the CalGreen Code,and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,and RR 5-1 (limits idling). The Project aims to achieve energy conservation goals within the State of California. As such, the Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, during Project construction or operation. Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 5.2: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant. 7. Geology and Soils Impact 6.1(i): The Project site is not in a fault hazard area;nor is the Project site within a mapped Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault.No impact would occur. Impact 6.1(ii): The Project site is within a seismically active region. As such, the Project's proposed structures may be subject to moderate to large seismic events,resulting in strong seismic ground shaking. As required by RR 6-1 and 6-2,the Project would be required to comply with the City's Building Regulations/2019 California Building Code (CBC) and the City's Grading Standards, and would be required to incorporate the recommendations from the Geotechnical Investigation,which would ensure that people and/or structures would not be exposed to potential substantial adverse effects from strong seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 6.1(iii): The Project is not located within an area of liquefaction susceptibility.The Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. No impact would occur. Impact 6.1 (iv): The Project site and surrounding areas are relatively flat. The Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury, or death involving landslides.No impact would occur. Impact 6.2: The Project site is in a soil erosion hazard area, where soils have a moderate to high erosion hazard and soil blowing hazard.Construction activities and operations would be conducted in adherence to City,regional,and State regulations related to management of windblown dust and other sources of soil erosion (RR 6-3 and RR 6-4). Additionally, construction activities would be 9 conducted in compliance regulations pertaining to protection of water quality. With adherence to existing regulations and requirements, there would be a less than significant impact related to erosion during construction and operation. Impact 6.3: The near surface soils encountered at the on-site boring locations consist of artificial fill soils and native alluvium. Grading of the Project site would be performed in accordance with the City's building and grading standards and recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation(RR 6-1 and RR 6-2),and impacts related to instability of the site's geologic materials would be less than significant. Impact 6.4: The Project site soils have low expansion potential and no soils would be imported to the Project site.No impact would occur related to expansive soils. Impact 6.5: The Project would connect to the City-owned municipal wastewater conveyance system and would not utilize septic tanks for an alternative wastewater disposal system.The Project would have no impact related to the use of septic tanks and/or alternative wastewater systems. 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 7.1: Construction and operation of the Project, which would replace existing buildings, would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)/City screening threshold for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and would not generate a net increase in GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may significantly impact the environment. GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Notwithstanding, the Project Applicant has agreed to implement additional mitigation measures(revised MM 2-1 and new MM 2-2)identified in Section 'III.B.1, below, which would further reduce the Project's less than significant GHG emissions. Impact 7.2: The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including Senate Bill (SB) 32 and the California Air Resources Board(CARB)2017 Scoping Plan,the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG),Connect SoCal,and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan. This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required. Notwithstanding, the Project Applicant has agreed to implement additional mitigation measures(revised MM 2-1 and new MM 2-2), which would further reduce the Project's less than significant GHG emissions. 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 8.1 & 8.2: Due to the lack of contaminants that exceed established standards for commercial/industrial uses, construction of the Project would not result in the exposure of the public to hazardous materials associated with potential Recognized Environmental Concerns (RECs).Further,no Asbestos Containing Materials(ACMs)or Lead Based Paint(LBP)occurs on- site. Construction and operation of the Project would involve handling of hazardous materials in limited quantities and typical to urban environments.Through compliance with existing regulations applicable to the Project(RR 8-1 through RR 8-3)the Project would not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment.Impacts would be less than significant. 10 Impact 8.3: No existing or proposed schools are located within one-quarter mile of the Project site. The nearest school to the Project site (Sacred Heart Parish School) is located 1.5 miles to the north.Accordingly,the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.Additionally,the Project would not cause a significant human health or cancer risk to school children at the nearest school to the Project site (Sacred Heart Parish School) due to air pollutant emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 8.4: The Project site is located on the State list of underground storage tanks(USTs) and leaking underground storage tanks(LUSTS)due to the previous presence of USTs on-site;the on- site USTs were removed in 1998.During the removal,no petroleum hydrocarbon staining or odors were noted beneath the USTs. The location of the Project on a site included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.No impact would occur and no mitigation is required. Impact 8.5: The Project site is located within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) for the Ontario International Airport (ONT). The Project site is located outside the safety zones for the ONT; however,it is within the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)Height Notification Surface Zone and near the Airspace Obstruction Surface Zone. The proposed buildings would have a maximum height of 50-feet, would not require notification of the FAA, and would not cause an obstruction for aircraft operations. The Project site is also with the Overflight Notification Zone. Although no safety hazard would result,the Project would adhere to the requirements of the ONT Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan related to Real Estate Disclosure Policy (refer to RR 8-4). The Project would not result in airport-related safety hazards for people residing or working in the Project area. Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 8.6: The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. The Project would not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. No impact would result and no mitigation is required. Impact 8.7: The Project site is not located within a designated fire hazard area or a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone within a Local Responsibility Area.The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk associated with wildland fires.No impact would occur. 10. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact 9.1: Short-term construction and long-term operation of development under the Project would generate pollutants that may enter stormwater. However, compliance with existing regulations, as identified in RR 9-1 through RR 9-3, would prevent the violation of water quality standards, ensure compliance with waste discharge requirements and prevent the degradation of stormwater quality and groundwater quality. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Impact 9.2: The Project would result in net increase in water demand as compared to existing conditions; however, the net increase would represent less than one percent of water demand for Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD).Therefore,the Project would not deplete groundwater supplies.The Project site is not in an CVWD groundwater recharge area;therefore,implementation of the Project would not interfere with groundwater recharge.Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Impact 9.3: The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off- site, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site, create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or impede or redirect flood flows. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Impact 9.4: The Project site is not within a 100-year flood zone,is not within a tsunami zone,and is not within proximity to an enclosed or partially enclosed body of water that is capable of producing seiches. Therefore,there would be no impact related to risk of release of pollutants due to Project inundation from a flood, tsunami or seiche. The Project site is not located within a dam inundation area and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation is not required. Impact 9.5: The Project site is within the Santa Ana River Basin and with adherence to RR 9-1 through RR 9-3, the Project would not conflict with the Santa Ana Basin Plan. The Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins are "low priority" basins and not subject to the requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan.No impacts would occur. 11. Land Use and Planning Impact 10.1: The Project site is surrounded by existing non-residential development. Redevelopment of the Project site, including construction of new Street A, would not physically divide an established community.No impact would occur. Impact 10.2: Implementation of the Project would not result in conflicts with any local or regional land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.The Project is consistent with the advisory Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (2010) Policy LU-7.1 because following the preparation of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (20�10), the NRG Etiwanda Generating Station closed and there is no longer a need for the imthediately surrounding areas to be developed with heavy industrial uses. No impacts would occur. 12. Mineral Resources As identified in the NOP, the Project site is not located within an area known to be underlain by regionally-important mineral resources and is not identified as a locally-important mineral resource recovery site. Implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residents of the State of California. No impact would result. 13. Noise Impact 11.2: The Project would not result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels during construction or operation. This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required. 12 Impact 11.3: The Project site is located within the ONT AIA but outside the 60 dBA CNEL airport noise impact zone. The Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels.This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required. 14. Population and Housing Impact 12.1: The Project proposes to redevelop the Project site with two warehouse buildings and would not include the development of any residential uses. The Project would result in a net increase of approximately 277 employment opportunities. The Project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area.Impacts would be less than significant. Impact 12.2: The Project site does not contain any residential structures under existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people and would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.No impact would occur. 15. Public Services As identified in the NOP,the Project would not involve new residential uses or an increase in the City's population,and there is an existing demand for public services at the Project site associated with the existing development on-site. The Project would be developed in adherence to existing regulations relative to fire protection, and required development impact fees would be paid. The Project would not require the construction of new or alteration of existing public service facilities to maintain an adequate level of service to the Project area,and no physical environmental impacts would result. Impacts to public services would be less than significant. 16. Recreation As identified in the NOP, the Project does not propose any uses that would directly generate a population that would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. In addition,the Project does not propose to construct any new on-or off-site recreation facilities. Implementation of the Project would not result in the increased use or substantial physical deterioration of an existing neighborhood or regional park, or substantial adverse environmental effects related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Impacts related to recreational facilities would be less than significant. 17. Transportation/Traffic Impact IM: The Project site is within a Transit Priority Area, and the Project would be implemented in accordance with applicable regulations related to Transportation(refer to RR 13-2 and RR 13-3).The Project would not conflict with a program,plan,ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. No impact would result. Impact 13.2: The Project's VMT impact would be considered less than significant based on the City's Low VMT Area screening threshold. Further, the Project's VMT impact would be considered less than significant based on the comparison of baseline Project-generated VMT per service population to the City's baseline condition. Thus,the Project would not conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required. 13 Impact 13.3: Construction activities within the public right-of-way would be conducted in accordance with requirements established by the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario (refer to RR 13-1 and RR 13-5) and Caltrans as appropriate, and Project-generated truck traffic during construction and operation would travel on designated truck routes,and would adhere to applicable regulations associated with truck travel (refer to RR 13-4). The Project does not involve the introduction of any design features or incompatible uses that would substantially increase hazards for motorists, pedestrians,or bicyclists, on the roadways surrounding the Project site. This impact would be less than significant. Impact 13.4: Proposed construction activities would be conducted in compliance with requirements of the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario(refer to RR 13-1 and RR 13-5),and the Project circulation system would meet Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) standards for access, width, and turning radii. The Project would provide adequate emergency access and impacts would be less than significant. 18. Tribal Cultural Resources Impact 14.1.a: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resources that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k).No impact would occur. 19. Utilities and Service Systems Impact 15.1: The Project would increase the demand for utility services and in addition to cooplying with Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards and the CALGreen Code,the Project would adhere to regulations addressing water conservation (refer to RR 15-2 and RR 15-3). Utility infrastructure installation and associated improvements would occur within the identified physical impact area for the Project (on-site and within the public right-of-way along adjacent streets) as addressed throughout the Draft EIR, and in compliance with applicable requirements of the utility pro iders(RR 15-1).No additional impacts would result.This impact would be less than significant anc no mitigation is required. Im act 15. : Development allowed by the Project would require water supplies from the CVWD. Th Project-specific Water Supply Assessment (WSA) demonstrates that CVWD has available wa er supplies to meet the water demands of the Project for the next twenty years through 2040, inc uding demands during normal, single dry and multiple dry years. The CVWD has concurred with the findings of the WSA that available water supplies would be adequate to serve the Project. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Impact 15.3: The Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) wastewater treatment facilities have sufficient capacity to serve the Project and existing commitments. This impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Imact 15.4: The Project's construction and operational refuse would be disposed of at the Mid Valley Landfill. Construction and operational activities would comply with applicable regulations addressing solid waste management (refer to RR 15-4 and RR 15-5). The Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.This impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 14 Impact 15.5: Construction and operation associated with implementation the Project would be conducted in compliance with applicable statues and regulations related to solid waste.No impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 20. Wildfire As identified in the NOP,the Project site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone, and is surrounded by development, with no wildland areas in the immediate vicinity. As such, no impacts related to wildfire would occur. C. FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTS DETERMINED TO BE MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL The EIR identified certain potentially significant effects that could result from the Project. However, the City finds for each of the significant or potentially significant impacts identified in this section that based upon substantial evidence in the record, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR and, thus, that adoption of the mitigation measures set forth below will reduce these significant or potentially significant effects to less-than- significant levels. Adoption of the recommended mitigation measures will effectively make the mitigation measures part of the Project. Impacts and Mitigation Measures are presented below in summary form. For a detailed description of impacts and Mitigation Measures, see the appropriate text in the EIR. As stated in Part I of these Findings, above, the City hereby binds itself to implement these measures as measures built into the design of the Project itself or as conditions of Project approval. 1. Air Quality Threshold 2.1: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: The air quality plan applicable to the Project is the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP).The Project's net operational emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds or LST thresholds,and the Project's construction and operational characteristics would not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. However, prior to mitigation the Project's construction-related emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds for NOx• Thus, Project-related construction activities have the potential to result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the 2016 AQMP, resulting in a potentially significant impact. With the implementation of MM 2-1, which was expanded in the Final EIR to include additional construction-related mitigation requirements recommended by the CARB the Project would not conflict with the 2016 AQMP,and this impact would be less than significant. MM 2-1 reduces NOx emissions by requiring the use of Tier 3 and Tier 4 equipment, restricting idling time for heavy construction equipment,requiring electrical hookups for zero near 15 i zero construction equipment and use of commercially available electric powered equipment, and requiring use of Model Year 2014 or later heavy-duty trucks for dirt and material hauling. To reduce the Project's less than significant operational air quality impacts identified in the Draft EIR,new MM 2-2 was also added in the Final EIR in response to CARB's recommendations.MM 2-2 reduces NOx emissions through Project design requirements(EV-ready truck dock positions), and operational requirements to be imposed on future building occupants related to transportation refrigeration units(TRUs),use of service equipment powered by alternative fuels,and idling times for trucks and support equipment. MM 2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit issuance,the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall verify that the following applicable notes are included on the grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with these notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction-site by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. • During construction activity, Project construction contractors shall ensure that off-road diesel construction equipment complies with applicable California Air Resources Board(CARB)emissions standards or equivalent and shall ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. • The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier III certified or better, by construction phase as shown: o Demolition/Crushing: ■ Boom Lift ■ Concrete/Industrial Saws ■ Crusher ■ Skid Steer o Utilities/Infrastructure: ■ Trencher o Building Construction: ■ Forklifts ■ Generator Sets ■ Welders o Paving: ■ Pavers ■ Paving Equipment ■ Rollers o Architectural Coating ■ Air Compressors • The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier IV Final certified or better, by construction phase as shown: o Demolition/Crushing: ■ Breakers ■ Excavators ■ Generator Sets ■ Rubber Tired Dozers 16 o Grading: ■ Crawler Tractors • Excavators ■ Graders ■ Rubber Tired Dozers ■ Scrapers o Utilities/Infrastructure: ■ Excavators ■ Skip Loaders/Backhoes o Building Construction ■ Cranes ■ Crawler Tractors ■ Laser Screed ■ Scissor Loaders/Backhoes ■ Skip Loaders/Backhoes • Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to two minutes and electrical hook ups shall be provided to support use of zero and near-zero construction equipment and tools whenever feasible. • Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction shall be electric powered, provided that it is commercially available, which may be plug-in (electric)or battery powered. • Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material hauling during construction shall meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency/California Air Resource Board truck engine standard for Model Year 2014 or later. MM 2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following operational requirements in the final building design or stipulate the operational requirements for building occupants, as appropriate: Project Design • Make truck dock positions EV-ready by installing conduits at truck dock positions for future accommodation of light-duty and/or heavy-duty electric trucks and charging stations. Lease Agreement and Owner-Occupant Requirements • Those loading docks used by trucks with transport refrigeration units(TRU) as determined by a cold storage tenant shall be equipped with electrical hookups(applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only). • TRUs entering the Project site shall be plug-in capable(applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only). • On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall be no longer than 15 minutes (applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only). • Service equipment(e.g.,yard hostlers,yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks)shall be powered by alternative fuels, electrical batteries or other 17 alternative/non-diesel fuels(e.g., propane)that do not emit diesel particulate matter, and that are low or zero emission. • Trucks and support equipment shall not idle longer than five minutes while on site. Threshold 2.2: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or Stale ambient air quality standard? Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: Prior to mitigation and with adherence to applicable regulatory requirements (RR-1 through RR-5), the Project's construction activities would result in a cumulatively-considerable net increase of NOx, which is an 03 precursor, for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard,resulting in a potentially significant impact. As discussed above, this impact would be mitigated to a less than significant level with implementation of MM 2-1, as revised in the Final EIR, which is presented above because MM 2-1 includes requirements that serve to reduce NOx emissions. During operation, the Project would not result in a cumulatively-considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard, and impacts would therefore be less than significant. Notwithstanding the Project's less than significant impact, new MM 2-2 presented above would also be implemented to further reduce operational air pollutant emissions.As discussed above,MM 2-2 includes requirements that serve to reduce NOx emissions. 2. Cultural Resources Threshold 4.2: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: The Project has a low potential to impact unknown archaeological resources; however, there is a potential to encounter subsurface archaeological resources during construction resulting in a potentially significant impact prior to mitigation.Implementation of MM 4-1 and MM 4-2, which identify actions to be taken during construction to protect unknown resources, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. MM 4-1 requires that prior to the commencement of grading,a qualified archaeologist be retained to conduct contractor training so all personnel are aware of the potential for the presence of resources at the site and understand the protocols to follow in the event of a discovery. In the unlikely event that archaeological resources are unearthed, resulting in a potential loss of a previously unknown resource, MM 4-2 requires a qualified archaeologist must be retained to evaluate the find and make decisions on its disposition. MM 4-1 Prior to site preparation or grading activities,construction personnel shall be instructed by a qualified Archaeologist of the potential for encountering unique archaeological resources and instructed on steps to take in the event such resources are encountered. This shall include the provision of written materials to familiarize personnel with the 18 _- range of resources that might be expected, the type of activities that may result in impacts, and the legal framework of cultural resources protection. All construction personnel shall be instructed to stop work in the vicinity of a potential discovery until a qualified Archaeologist assesses the significance of the find and implements appropriate measures to protect or scientifically remove the find. Construction personnel shall also be informed that unauthorized collection of archaeological resources is prohibited. MM 4-2 In the event that cultural resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation and grading activities,the Contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery.The Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified Archaeologist(Project Archaeologist),subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to evaluate the significance of the find and to determine an appropriate course of action. All artifacts except for human remains and related grave goods or sacred objects belong to the Property Owner. All artifacts discovered at the development site shall be inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist. Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function,and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting,these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner, as deemed appropriate. If any artifacts of Native American origin are discovered, the Property Owner/Developer and Project Archaeologist shall notify the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department and the appropriate local Native American tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission. The significance of Native American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the tribe (refer to MM 14-1 though MM 14-6 in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural Resources). All items found in association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special handling(see RR 4-1). Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts, shall be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. The report shall include a discussion of the significance of all recovered artifacts.The report and inventory,when submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, shall signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to archaeological and/or cultural resources.A copy of the report shall also be filed with the Archaeological Information Center(AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum and the Native American tribe, as appropriate. 19 3. Geology & Soils Threshold 6.6. Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site is underlain by native alluvial soils,which have a High paleontological sensitivity. The depth of proposed excavation for the Project is up to 26 feet. Therefore, there is a potential for significant paleontological resources to be unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, without mitigation. With the implementation of MM 6-1, which identifies actions to be taken during construction to protect paleontological resources that may be present, potential impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. MM 6-1 requires that full-time paleontological monitoring be required starting at a depth of 12 feet below the surface during grading,excavation,or utility trenching activities at the Project site.For grading and other earth disturbance activities at depths between five and 12 feet below the surface,periodic "spot checks"for potential paleontological resources is warranted and also required by MM 6-1. If significant fossils are discovered during a spot check, full-time monitoring is required. MM 6-1 further identifies steps to be taken in the event paleontological resources are encountered,including temporary halting construction activities or diverting equipment to allow for the removal of fossils in a timely manner; depositing fossils in an accredit institution, if warranted; and,preparation of a final monitoring and mitigation report. MM 6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City, a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Monitoring Program (PRIMMP). The PRIMMP shall include the provision of a qualified professional paleontologist (or his or her trained paleontological monitor representative) during on-site subsurface excavation of Quaternary (i.e., early Holocene and late Pleistocene) alluvial-fan deposits, as outlined below. Selection of the paleontologist shall be subject to approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director,or designee,and no grading activities shall occur at the site until the paleontologist has been approved by the City. The PRIMMP shall include the requirements below. • Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be performed by a qualified paleontologist or paleontological monitor.Monitoring shall be conducted full time in areas of grading or excavation activities that occur in undisturbed exposures of Quaternary (i.e., early Holocene and late Pleistocene) alluvial-fan deposits at a depth of 12 feet and below in order to mitigate any adverse impacts (loss or destruction)to potential nonrenewable paleontological resources. For grading and other earth disturbance activities at depths between 5 and 12 feet below the surface, periodic spot checks for potential paleontological resources shall be conducted. Periodic monitoring shall consist of approximately 1 to 3 scheduled site visits per week by a paleontological monitor during construction ground disturbance. If significant fossils are discovered during a spot check,full-time monitoring should be initiated. • Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediment that are likely to 20 contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates.The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely manner.Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or if they are present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. • Recovered specimens shall be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including screen-washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates, if indicated by the results of test sampling. Preparation of individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-consuming than for accumulations of invertebrate fossils. • All fossils shall be deposited in an accredited institution, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, that maintains collections of paleontological materials. All costs of the paleontological monitoring and mitigation program, including any one-time charges by the receiving institution, are the responsibility of the Project Applicant. • The Project Paleontologist shall prepare of a final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record their original location(s). A letter documenting receipt and acceptance of all fossil collections by the receiving institution must be included in the final report.The report,when submitted to(and accepted by)the City of Rancho Cucamonga,shall signify satisfactory completion of the Project program to mitigate impacts to any nonrenewable paleontological resources. 4. Noise Threshold 11.1: Would the Project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: During the Project's construction phase, the Project would result in a temporary increase in noise levels along the eastern property boundary, which is shared with the West Valley Detention Center. The construction noise levels would exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga construction noise level standard of 65 dBA Leq. With implementation of MM I I-I and MM 11-2, construction-related noise impacts at the eastern property boundary would be reduced 62.1 dBA Leq, which would not exceed the City's standard, resulting in a less than significant impact with mitigation. MM 11-2 requires installation of a temporary noise barrier at the eastern property line during construction, and MM 11-2 requires use of properly operating and maintained mufflers and directing stationary construction equipment away noise sensitive receivers. 21 The Project would not result in a permanent increase in daytime or nighttime noise levels during operation in excess of established noise standards. This impact is less than significant, and no mitigation is required. MM 11-1 Prior to issuance of grading or building permits,the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall review the plans to ensure the plans require the installation of a minimum 6-foot-high temporary construction perimeter noise barrier along the Project site's boundary with the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center. The location and following specifications for the noise control barrier shall also be included on the plans: • The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. • The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of the following materials with no decorative cutouts or line-of-sight openings between shielded areas and the noise source: o An acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic curtains, quilted blankets, or equivalent) attached to the construction-site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. o Any combination of construction materials satisfying a weight of at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area. • The noise barriers shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes,or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. The required barrier shall be installed prior to any construction activities commencing on-site and shall remain in place until construction activities have been completed. The construction contractor shall allow for periodic inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the required noise barrier remains in place until completion of construction activities on-site. MM 11-2 During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. The construction contractor shall allow for periodic inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure compliance with these requirements. I 5. Tribal Cultural Resources Threshold 14.1.b: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision(c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1,the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: The Project has a low potential to impact unknown tribal cultural resources; however, there is a potential to encounter subsurface tribal cultural resources during 22 construction resulting in a potentially significant impact prior to mitigation.Implementation of MM 14-1 through MM 14-6, required during the City's consultation with the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation,would reduce this impact to a less than significant level.MM 14-1 through MM 14-6 require monitoring of ground-disturbing activities,outline the parameters for the monitoring activities, and identify actions that should be taken if tribal cultural resources or Native American human remains are encountered.These measures further ensure the proper identification and subsequent treatment of any tribal cultural resources and/or Native American human remains that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with the development of the Project.If human remains are encountered in subsurface soils,implementation of RR 4-1,which outlines state-required actions required to be taken in the event human remains of Native American origin are discovered,would also ensure potential impacts are less than significant. MM 14-1 Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation—the tribe that consulted on this project pursuant to Assembly Bill A52 - S1318 (the "Tribe" or the "Consulting Tribe"). A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.The Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring,grubbing,tree removals,boring,grading,excavation,drilling,and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground- disturbing activities at the Project site have little to no potential for impacting tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find(not less than the surrounding 50 feet)until the find can be assessed.All tribal cultural resources unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by the Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe and a qualified archaeologist if one is present. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate,for educational,cultural and/or historic purposes.If human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue in other parts of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[fJ).Preservation in place(i.e., avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin(non-TCR) shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 23 MM 14-2 Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects,called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours,the NAHC and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. MM 14-3 Upon discovery of human remains, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant shall immediately divert work at minimum of 100 feet and place an exclusion zone around the discovery location. The monitor/consultant(s) shall then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who shall call the coroner. Work shall continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are human and subsequently Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance.If the finds are determined to be Native American,the coroner shall notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who shall then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). MM 14-4 If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation is designated MLD,the Koo- nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial,the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects that,as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. MM 14-5 Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day,the remains shall be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe shall make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials shall be removed. The Tribe shall work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations shall either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe 24 does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure container on-site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery.The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. MM 14-6 Native American and Archaeological monitoring during construction projects shall be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance,physical modification,or separation of TCR's shall be taken. The Native American monitor must be approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. Principal personnel for Archaeology must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES AND GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS A. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion of any significant irreversible environmental changes that would be caused by a proposed project. Specifically, Section 15126.2(d)states: Uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project may be irreversible, since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or non-use thereafter unlikely. Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts (such as highway improvement which provides access to a previously inaccessible area) generally commit future generations to similar uses. Also, irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents associated with the project.Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified. Generally,a project would result in significant irreversible environmental changes if the following occurs: • The primary and secondary impacts would generally commit future generations to similar uses; • The project would involve a large commitment of nonrenewable resources; • The project involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents associated with the project; and • The proposed consumption of resources is not justified (e.g., the project involves the wasteful use of energy). Determining whether the Project may result in significant irreversible effects requires a determination of whether key non-renewable resources would be degraded or destroyed in such a way that there would be little possibility of restoring them. The southern portion of the Project site 25 is developed with industrial uses,associated facilities,and landscaping,and the northern portion of the Project site consists of a surface parking area and vacant land(a former vineyard).The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan anticipates that development within the Southeast Focus Area will eventually support urban uses that would generate jobs and revenue. Thus,the Project would alter the Project site by replacing the existing warehouse and retail buildings, which were originally constructed in 1983,with two new contemporary high-cube industrial warehouse buildings. There are no non-renewable resources present at the Project site; therefore, conversion of the land from its current state to a high-cube industrial warehouse development would have no direct effect on any such resources at the Project site. Construction of the Project would require the commitment and reduction of nonrenewable and/or slowly renewable resources, including petroleum fuels and natural gas (e.g., for construction, vehicle operations)as well as lumber, sand/gravel, steel, copper, lead, and other metals(for use in building and internal roadway construction and utility infrastructure). Construction of the Project would not involve the use of large sums or sources of renewable energy. Additionally,the Project is required by law to comply with federal, state,and local building requirements addressing energy conservation, compliance with these requirements reduces a building operation's energy volume that is produced by fossil fuels. Non-renewable natural resources that would be consumed over the operating life of the Project could include fuels (e.g., petroleum) for both on-site workers who would commute to the Project site and for the vehicles that would deliver goods to/from the Project site.Depending on the specific occupants of the Project's future buildings, various non-renewable natural resources could be consumed during operations, including metals (such as lead, copper, etc.). There also could be a variety of ancillary maintenance and fueling activities for equipment used inside the future buildings and in the truck loading areas of the industrial buildings. These activities could involve the Muse of liquid fuels such as gasoline and diesel, propane, or other gases. The consumption of nory-renewable resources to construct and operate the Project over the long-term would likely commit subsequent generations to the same use of the land and similar patterns of energy consumption, although the Project is expected to generate a significant amount of solar energy thr ugh a commitment to construct a rooftop solar system under the proposed Development AgI eement It is improbable that the site would revert to permanently undeveloped conditions due to Me large capital investment that would already have been committed. However, the Project is not!expected to reduce the availability of any natural resources as a result of long-term operational activities. An'-analysis of the Project's potential to transport or handle hazardous materials which, if released into the environment,could result in irreversible damage to the environment is provided in the EIR. As concluded in the analysis, compliance with federal, State, and local regulations related to hazardous materials would be required of all contractors working on the property during the Project's construction and of all occupants that occupy the Project's buildings. As such, construction and long-term operation of the Project would not have the potential to cause significant irreversible damage to the environment, including damage that may result from upset or accident conditions. Lastly, an increased commitment of public services(e.g., police and fire)would also be required. However, as discussed above, the Project would not require the construction of new or alteration of existing fire or police protection facilities to maintain an adequate level of service to the Project area,and no physical environmental impacts would result. 26 In summary,Project development is an irreversible commitment of the land,energy resources,and public services. B. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS CEQA requires an EIR include a discussion of ways in which the proposed project could induce growth. The CEQA Guidelines identify a project as growth-inducing if it fosters economic or population growth or if it encourages the construction of additional housing either directly or indirectly in the surrounding environment (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.2[e]). New employees from the future high-cube warehouse uses proposed by the Project represent direct forms of growth. These direct farms of growth have a secondary effect of expanding the size of local markets and inducing additional economic activity in the area, placing additional demands on public services and infrastructure systems, and in the generation of a variety of environmental impacts. To address this issue, potential growth-inducing effects are examined through analysis of the following questions: I. Would this project remove obstacles to growth(e.g.,through the construction or extension of major infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the project area or through changes in existing regulations pertaining to land development)? 2. Would this project result in the need to expand one or more public services to maintain desired levels of service? 3. Would this project encourage or facilitate economic effects that could result in other activities that could significantly affect the environment? 4. Would approval of this project involve some precedent setting action that could encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment? A project could indirectly induce growth by reducing or removing barriers to growth or by creating a condition that attracts additional population or new economic activity. However, a project's potential to induce growth does not automatically result in growth.Growth can only happen through capital investment in new economic opportunities by the private or public sectors. Under CEQA, growth inducement is not considered necessarily detrimental,beneficial, or of little significance to the environment. This issue is presented to provide additional information on ways in which the Project could contribute to significant changes in the environment,beyond the direct consequences of implementing the Project examined in the EIR. 1. Would this Project remove obstacles to growth (e.g., through the construction or extension of major infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the Project area or through changes in existing regulations pertaining to land development)? Urban development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and existing development in the Southeast Focus Area, described in Section III.A, are already served by an extensive network of utility/service systems and the other infrastructure necessary to accommodate or serve the existing conditions and planned growth. The existing utility/service systems can be readily upgraded and/or extended onto the future development sites. Further, future development would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis prior to the time of proposed construction in order to determine the utility/service systems necessary to serve the proposed land uses. The Project would not involve the construction of any off-site infrastructure; existing and planned 27 �I utility infrastructure and facilities are available adjacent to the Project site. New utility infrastructure would be required to serve the proposed development and would connect to existing utilities. The utility infrastructure installed as part of the Project would be sized and located expressly to serve the Project and would not, therefore, induce growth in the Project vicinity. The Project would not involve the construction of any major roadways. A new public street referred to as"Street A"would be constructed along the eastern boundary of the Project site to provide a connection between 4' Street and 6' Street to alleviate vehicular trips on nearby streets. Additionally, as shown in the General Plan Circulation Plan, the Project includes the connection of 6t' Street over the railroad tracks west of the Project site to complete 6th Street between Santa Anita Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. These roadway improvements would not induce growth in the Project vicinity. As previously discussed,the Project site is currently designated for Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial uses. The Project implements growth and development anticipated in the Southeast Focus Area, as identified in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. However, a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are requested for the northern portion of the Project site for consistency of land use designations across the Project site and to create a uniform set of development standards to follow. The Project is not, therefore, considered to be growth- inducing with respect to the removal of obstacles to growth. 2. Would this Project result in the need to expand one or more public services to maintain desired levels of service?Consistent with the existing condition,the Project would create the typical range of service calls for the RCFPD and SBSD that occur with the proposed industrial ,uses. The Project would not necessitate the construction of new or the expansion of existing public service facilities in order to maintain desired levels of service. No demand for other public services (e.g., schools, parks, libraries) would occur with the Project and the facilities or associated resources of these services do not need to be expanded. In addition,the City has funding mechanisms in place through existing regulations and standard practices to accommodate future growth and the demand for public services. This Project would not, therefo e,have significant growth inducing consequences with respect to public services. 3. Would this Project encourage or facilitate economic effects that could result in other activities that could significantly affect the environment? During Project construction, a number of designs, engineering, and construction-related jobs would be created. This would last until Project construction is completed. This would be an indirect, growth-inducing effect of the Project. As the Project is built and occupied, Project employees would seek shopping, entertainment, employment, home improvement, auto maintenance, and other economic opportunities in the surrounding area. This would represent an increased demand for such economic goods and services and could, therefore, encourage the creation of new businesses and/or the expansion of existing businesses that address these economic needs. However, it is expected that any such development would occur consistent with planned growth identified in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the General Plans of nearby cities, including Ontario and Fontana. The Project is located near existing commercial and retail areas that would help serve the needs of Project employees.However,the Project would not increase the residential population in the City and would not directly induce or cause substantial unexpected growth in the area. 28 Once operational,the Project could result in a net increase of approximately 277 employment opportunities in the City,and the number of jobs that would result from operation of the Project is within the growth projections for the City and region, including the growth assumptions in SCAG's current Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS; referred to as Connect SoCal). It is expected that the short-term construction jobs and new positions during Project operation would be filled by workers who already reside in the local area or region. Operation of the Project is not anticipated to generate a substantial permanent increase in population in the City,and the increase in demand for additional goods and services would be limited to those associated with employee demands. 4. Would this Project involve some precedent setting action that could encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment:' The Project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to provide a consistent land designation for the Project site. However, no changes to any of the City's building safety standards(i.e.,building,grading,plumbing,mechanical,electrical,fire codes)are proposed or required to implement this Project. Regulatory requirements and mitigation measures have been identified to ensure that implementation of the Project complies with applicable City plans, policies, and ordinances, ensure that there are no conflicts with adopted land development regulations, and environmental impacts are minimized. The Project does not propose any precedent-setting actions that,if approved,would specifically allow,or encourage other projects and resultant growth to occur. Furthermore, the Project is not extending any infrastructure or facilitating further development.Accordingly,the Project's potential influence on other nearby properties to redevelop at greater intensities and/or different uses than the City's General Plan and Zoning allow is speculative. CEQA does not require the analysis of speculative effects (CEQA Guidelines Section 151454). If any other property owner were to propose redevelopment of a property in the Project vicinity or in any part of the City, the redevelopment project would require evaluation under CEQA based on its own merits, including an analysis of direct and cumulatively considerable effects. V. FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Although the Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts, CEQA requires evaluations of alternatives that can reduce the significance of identified Project impacts that will not be avoided or substantially lessened by mitigation measures and can "feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the proposed Project." Thus, overall Project objectives were considered by the City in evaluating the alternatives. The objectives that have been established for the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project are listed below. 1. Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2. Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City's ongoing municipal operations. 3. Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for operational 29 design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region. 4. Create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment, and to improve the jobs to housing balance. 5. Develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with other nearby land uses. 6. Maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways,and avoid locating industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to residential uses. 7. Develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network. The following findings and brief explanation of the rationale for the findings regarding Project alternatives identified in the EIR are set forth to comply with the requirements of Section 15091(a)(3)of the CEQA Guidelines. The consideration of alternatives is an integral component of the CEQA process.The selection and evaluation of a reasonable range of alternatives provides the public and decision-makers with information on ways to avoid or lessen environmental impacts created by a proposed project.When selecting alternatives for evaluation, CEQA requires alternatives that meet most of the basic objectives of the Project, while avoiding or substantially lessening the Project's significant and unavoidable impacts. As noted above, the Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts. Fogr alternatives to the Project were defined and analyzed. Nol!Proiect/No Action Alternative Section 15126.6(e)of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR evaluate a"no project"alternative to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving a project with the impacts of not approving that project. Section 15126.6(e)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines describes the two general types of no project alternative: (1) when the project is the revision of an existing land use or regulatory plan,policy, or ongoing operation,the no project alternative would be the continuation of that plan; and (2) when the project is other than a land use/regulatory plan (such as a specific development on an identifiable property),the no project alternative is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. Under the No Project/No Action Alternative,the existing warehouse building, retail building, and associated facilities on the Project site would be retained, but they would not be reoccupied and would remain vacant with no associated operations. As described previously, the Project site is currently occupied by a former Big Lots warehouse building and retail building which is currently vacant. The Project site includes 23,240-sf retail building and a 1,431,000-sf warehouse building. The No Project/No Action represents both types of no project alternatives outlined in the CEQA Guidelines: (1) continuation of development consistent with the existing land use and zoning 30 designations,and(2)assumes the Project does not proceed(leaving the existing warehouse building and retail building on-site). Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the No Project/No Action Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and unavoidable impact. The No Project/No Action Alternative would avoid the Project's less than significant impacts; however, it also has potential for negative effects associated with urban blight and safety and security issues. Findings Regarding Project Objectives The No Project/No Action Alternative would not meet the Project objectives,would not realize any of the Project's design benefits associated with new development and would not meet current City design standards. No Proiect/No Development Alternative—Reuse of Existing Buildings The Project site is currently occupied by a 1,43 1,000- sf former Big Lots warehouse building and a 23,240- sf for Big Lots retail building. Big Lots vacated the Project site in February 2020, and the Project site was reoccupied by Geodis from October 2020 to May 2021.Although the buildings are currently vacant, uses that are consistent with the City's zoning and adhere to applicable regulations could reoccupy the buildings. Under No Project/No Development—Reuse of Existing Buildings Alternative(No Project/No Development Alternative),the existing warehouse building, retail building,and associated facilities on the Project site would be retained and reoccupied for use consistent with that allowed by right pursuant to Section 17.30,Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District, of the City's Development Code. This includes, but is not limited to, ongoing warehouse and retail uses. It is expected that, depending on the type of use that would occupy the existing buildings,tenant improvements could be needed to accommodate reuse of the buildings; however, these improvements would not require approval of discretionary actions. With respect to roadway and utility infrastructure,this Alternatives analysis assumes that existing circulation patterns would be maintained, and existing utility infrastructure would continue to serve the site. This alternative would not involve implementation of the roadway and infrastructure improvements proposed as part of the Project, including construction of a public roadway that would be implemented with the Project(Street A),and construction of an at-grade crossing of 6' Street at the railroad tracks. The No Project/No Development Alternative represents both types of no project alternatives outlined in Section 15126.6(e)(3)of the CEQA Guidelines, discussed previously: (1)continuation of development consistent with the existing land use and zoning designations, and(2)assumes the Project does not proceed(leaving the existing warehouse building and retail building on-site). Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and unavoidable impact.Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical issues: air quality(due to construction-related emissions), cultural resources(due to the potential to encounter previously undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter previously undiscovered paleontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal 31 cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These potentially significant impacts are associated with construction activities, not operation of the Project and therefore would not apply to the No Project/No Development Alternative. As described above, the No Project/No Development Alternative would have a similar lack of impacts, or less than significant impacts, as the Project related to aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils (related to seismic ground shaking and soil conditions), hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology/drainage and groundwater, land use and planning, operational noise, population and housing, transportation, and utilities and service systems. Therefore, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen Project impact related to these issues. The Project and No Project/No Development Alternative would also have less than significant impacts for the following topics;however,the No Project/No Development Alternative would have less impacts: construction-related air quality emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, GHG emissions, geology and soils (related to paleontological resources), and tribal cultural resources.Notably,the No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid potentially significant impacts related to cultural resources, paleontological resources, and tribal cultural resources that require Project-level mitigation to reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The Project and No Project/No Development Alternative would have less than significant impacts for the following topics; however, the No Project/No Development Alternative would have potentially greater impacts: energy conservation; conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs; and water quality impacts during operations. Findings Regarding Project Objectives The discussion below addresses the ability of the No Project/No Development Alternative to attain the Project objectives. 1. Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The No Project/No Development Alternative would not involve redevelopment of the Project site, rather it would involve the reuse of existing buildings and facilities at the Project site for continued warehouse and retail uses. Additionally, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not further achievement of planning objectives outlined in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Therefore, while the No Project/No Development Alternative meets the intent of this Project objective, it does not meet it to the same extent as the Project. 2. Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City's ongoing municipal operations. The No Project/No Development Alternative would involve 'reuse of the existing buildings and would not maximize redevelopment of the underutilized Project site. While the No Project/No Development Alternative would generate revenue consistent with previous use of the site, it would not generate increased revenues. Therefore, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet this objective. 32 3. Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region. The reuse of the existing buildings on-site, which involves operation of a retail building, and leaving the northern portion of the Project site undeveloped, would not meet this Project objective, which is associated with maximizing development of the Project site through redevelopment and the operation of contemporary high cube warehouse industrial buildings. 4. To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment, and to improve the jobs to housing balance. The Project would generate more employment opportunities than what would be generated through reuse of the existing buildings.Therefore, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not achieve this objective to the same extent as the Project. 5. To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with other nearby land uses. Retention of the existing buildings under the No Project/No Development Alternative would not conflict with existing architecture or the operations of nearby uses and would achieve this objective. 6. To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways,and avoid locating industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to residential uses. The reuse of the existing buildings on-site, which involves operation of a retail building, and leaving the northern portion of the Project site undeveloped,would not maximize the amount of available industrial warehouse uses, and would not meet this Project objective. 7. To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network. The No Project/No Development Alternative would involve the use of existing buildings and facilities at the Project site for continued warehouse and retail uses. Although existing uses under the No Project/No Development Alternative would continue to operate with service from existing roadways and infrastructure,due to the reduction in warehouse uses, and lack of contemporary buildings,the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet the intent of this objective to the same extent as the Project relative to supporting goods movement in Southern California. Existiniz Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative Under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, the existing 1,43 1,000 sf warehouse building would be retained and operated as a warehouse,and the underutilized northern portion of the Project site would be developed with 530 new trailer parking stalls. The existing warehouse would be modified to include up to 54 additional loading dock doors.Additionally,it is also expected that internal improvements to the existing building would be needed to accommodate a tenant. Truck trailer parking would continue to be provided east of the warehouse building. The existing retail building and landscaping in the southern portion of the Project site would be removed and this area would be developed with surface parking(495 parking stalls with a combination of existing and new parking stalls). New landscaping would be installed on-site. This Alternative 33 would require installation of a retaining wall between the existing warehouse building in the southern portion of the Project site and new truck trailer parking area in the northern portion of the Project site. Existing circulation patterns would be maintained, and existing utility infrastructure would continue to serve the site. As with the Project, this Alternative would include replacement of existing sidewalks on 4' Street and 6''', and implementation of on-street bikeways along these roadways.In addition to the new truck trailer parking in the northern portion of the Project site,this Alternative would involve construction of the northern portion of Street A,which would terminate with a cul-de-sac before extending into the southern portion of the Project site,and retention of the existing rail spur. Should redevelopment of the southern portion of the Project site be considered in the future, extension of Street A to 4'h Street could be completed. Additionally,this Alternative does not involve the construction of an at-grade crossing of 6'i'Street at the railroad tracks. For purposes of analysis,it is anticipated that operations under this Alternative could also occur 24 hours per day/7 days per week, consistent with the Project. This Alternative would generate less PM peak hour trips and average daily trips(ADT)compared to reuse of the existing buildings(with no modifications), and a slight increase in AM peak hour trips. Additionally, due to the overall reduction in building intensity,this Alternative would generate less vehicle trips compared to the Project.The Project would result in a net increase of 176 actual AM peak hour trips, 104 actual PM peak hour trips, and 976 ADT. When considering passenger car equivalent(PCE)trip generation, the Project would result in a net increase of 189 actual AM peak hour trips, 110 actual PM peak hour trips, and 1,278 ADT. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would be consistent with the existing land use and zoning designations for the Project site, and associated development standards. Therefore,a General Plan amendment,and Zoning Map amendment would not be required.Further, it is not anticipated that the Project Applicant would enter into a Development Agreement with the City. This Alternative would require a site plan and architectural review, a Tentative Parcel Map, and a tree removal permit. Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts Tho Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the Existing Wajrehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and unavoidable impact. Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical issues: air quality(due to construction-related emissions),cultural resources(due to the potential to encounter undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter pal ontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These potentially significant impacts are associated with construction activities,not operation of the Project. As described above, the Project and the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would be required to comply with applicable regulations and would also implement the same mitigation measures required for the Project. Therefore,this Alternative would have a similar lack of impacts, or less than significant impacts, for each topical issue. However, due to the reduction in construction activities and overall building space, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would have reduced impacts associated with air pollutant emissions, GHG emissions,noise, and utilities and services systems. 34 Findings Regarding Project Objectives The discussion below addresses the ability of the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative to attain the Project objectives. 1. Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not conflict with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and therefore would meet this objective. 2. Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City's ongoing municipal operations. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would involve reuse of the existing warehouse building on-site and construction of a surface parking area for truck trailer parking in the northern portion of the site. While this Alternative would generate increased property tax revenue compared to existing conditions, it would not maximize redevelopment of the underutilized site. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not meet this objective. 3. Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region. The reuse of the existing warehouse building and addition of trailer dock doors and additional parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not meet this Project objective,which is associated with the operation of contemporary high cube warehouse buildings,and maximizing development on-site. Redevelopment of the Project is necessary to accomplish this objective. 4. To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment, and to improve the jobs to housing balance. The Project would generate more employment opportunities than what would be generated through reuse of the existing building with additional parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, due to the greater amount of building area proposed by the Project.Therefore,the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would meet the objective but not to the same extent as the Project as it would not generate additional new jobs. 5. To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with other nearby land uses.Retention of the existing use/building under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not conflict with existing architecture or the operations of nearby uses. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would meet this objective. 6. To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways,and avoid locating industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to residential uses.The reuse of the existing warehouse building and addition of surface parking under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking 35 Alternative would not maximize the amount of available industrial warehouse uses,and would not meet this Project objective. 7. To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would involve the use of the existing warehouse building and addition of parking for continued warehouse uses. Although the existing warehouse building would continue to operate with service from existing roadways and infrastructure,due to the reduction in warehouse space,and lack of contemporary buildings, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would not meet the intent of this objective to the same extent as the Project relative to supporting goods movement in Southern California. Existina Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative Under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative, the existing 1,431,000 sf warehouse building on the Project site would be retained and would operate as a high-cube warehouse, the existing retail building would be removed, and the underutilized northern portion of the Project site would be developed with a new 713,200 sf high-cube warehouse building and associated parking and facilities. Collectively with the existing warehouse and additional warehouse, this Alternative would have 2,144,200 sf of building area, compared to 2,175,000 sf with the Project, a reduction of 30,800 sf. Similar to the Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative, the existing warehouse would be modified to include up to 54 additional loading dock doors and additional truck trailer parking would be provided east of the existing building. A retaining wall would be installed along the northeastern portion of this truck trailer parking area. It is also anticipated that internal improvements to the existing building would be needed to accommodate a tenant. In addition to removal of the retail building in the southern portion of the Project site,existing landscaping in this area would be removed to accommodate additional surface parking(495 parking stalls consisting of a combination of existing and new parking stalls). The new 713,200 sf high-cube warehouse building in the northern portion of the Project site would include an 8,000-sf mezzanine area, and up to 16,000 sf of office space. There would be 88 dock doors and 89 trailer stalls on the north and south sides of the building,and automobile parking(258 stalls)would be provided near potential office areas.Approximately 100,000 sf of new landscaping would be installed around the building. This Alternative would require installation of a retaining wall between the existing and proposed buildings. With respect to circulation and utility infrastructure improvements, existing circulation patterns would be maintained,and existing utility infrastructure would continue to serve the site. Similar to the Project, this Alternative would include replacement of existing sidewalks on 4' Street and 6' Street, and implementation of on-street bikeways along these roadways. Short- and long-term bicycle parking would be provided for both buildings. The existing rail spur on-site (south of 6'' Street)would be retained. This Alternative would also include construction of the northern portion of Street A,which would terminate with a cul-de-sac before extending into the southern portion of the Project site,and retention of the existing rail spur.Should redevelopment of the southern portion of the Project site be considered in the future,extension of Street A to 4''Street could be completed. This Alternative does include the construction of an at-grade crossing of 6'' Street at the railroad tracks,as proposed with the Project. 36 it For purposes of analysis, it is anticipated that operations under this Alternative could also occur 24 hours per day/7 days per week, consistent with the Project. This Alternative would increase peak hour and ADT compared to reuse of the existing buildings(with no modifications). Additionally, due to the overall reduction in building intensity, this Alternative would generate slightly less vehicle trips compared to the Project. The Project would result in a net increase of 176 actual AM peak hour trips, 104 actual PM peak hour trips, and 976 ADT. When considering passenger car equivalent(PCE)trip generation,the Project would result in a net increase of 189 actual AM peak hour trips, 110 actual PM peak hour trips, and 1,278 ADT. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would involve uses allowed by the existing land use and zoning designations for the Project site. However, as with the Project, a General Plan amendment and Zoning Map amendment would be required for the northern portion of the Project site, changing the designation from Heavy Industrial to General Industrial. This Alternative would also require site plan and architectural review, a Tentative Parcel Map, and a tree removal permit.It is also anticipated that the Project Applicant would enter into a Development Agreement with the City. Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen a significant and unavoidable impact. Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to levels considered less than significant for the following topical issues: air quality (due to construction-related emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils(due to the potential to encounter paleontological resources), noise(due to construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). These potentially significant impacts are associated with construction activities, not operation of the Project. Both the Project and the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would be required to comply with applicable regulations and would also implement the same mitigation measures required for the Project.Therefore,this Alternative would have a similar lack of impacts, or less than significant impacts for each topical issue.However,due to the reduction in construction activities due to the reuse of the existing warehouse building, and slight reduction in overall building space,the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would have reduced impacts associated with air pollutant emissions,GHG emissions,and noise. Findings Regarding Project Objectives The discussion below addresses the ability of the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative to attain the Project objectives. I. Ensure that development of the Project site is accomplished consistent with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would not conflict with applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and therefore would meet this Project objective. 2. Maximize redevelopment of the existing underutilized Project site and generate increased property tax revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to support the City's ongoing municipal operations. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse 37 Alternative would involve reuse of the existing warehouse building on-site and construction of a new building in the underutilized northern portion of the site. Due to the similarity in overall building space as the Project, and because this Alternative would also increase property tax revenue,this Alternative would meet this Project objective. 3. Maximize development of Class A high cube warehouse industrial buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are designed to meet contemporary industry standards for operational design criteria, can accommodate a wide variety of users, and are economically competitive with similar industrial buildings in the local area and region. The reuse of the existing warehouse building and construction of a new building in the underutilized northern portion of the Project site under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective, but not to the same extent as the Project.Modifications to the existing building would not meet contemporary industry standards to the same extent as a new warehouse building. 4. To create employment-generating businesses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the need for members of the local workforce to commute outside the area for employment, and to improve the jobs to housing balance. As with the Project, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would generate new employment opportunities and would meet this Project objective,but not to the same extent as the Project. 5. To develop a project with an architectural design and operational characteristics that complement other existing buildings in the immediate vicinity and minimize conflicts with other nearby land uses. Retention of the existing warehouse building and construction of a new warehouse under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would not conflict with existing architecture or the operations of nearby uses. Therefore,the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective. i 6. '''To maximize industrial warehouse buildings in close proximity to an already-established :industrial area, designated truck routes, and the State highway system in order to avoid or shorten truck-trip lengths on other roadways,and avoid locating industrial warehouse ;,buildings in close proximity to residential uses. The Project site is within an established industrial area near designated truck routes and the State highway system. The reuse of the existing warehouse building and construction of a new building on the underutilized northern portion of the Project site under the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective. 7. To develop properties that have access to available infrastructure, including roads and utilities to be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would involve the use of the existing warehouse building and construction of new warehouse building,and would ;continue to operate with service from existing roadways and infrastructure. Additionally, the buildings would be used as part of the Southern California supply chain and goods movement network. Therefore, the Existing Warehouse and Additional Warehouse Alternative would meet this Project objective. Environmentally Superior Alternative CEQA requires the identification of an environmentally superior alternative. As discussed above, the No Project/No Development Alternative, which involves reuse of the existing building and facilities on-site would result in greater operational impacts than the Project for certain 38 environmental issues, less construction-related impacts,and no change from current conditions for other environmental issues. However, Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines states that, if the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, then the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. The Project would result in potentially significant impacts during construction for the following topics, and Project-level mitigation measures are required to reduce these potentially significant impacts to levels considered less than significant: air quality (due to construction-related emissions), cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered cultural resources), geology and soils (due to the potential to encounter paleontological resources), noise (due to construction-related noise), and tribal cultural resources (due to the potential to encounter undiscovered tribal cultural resources). For all other topics, the Project which would be implemented in compliance with applicable regulations, would result in no impact or a less than significant impact. The Project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore,no alternative is needed to reduce or avoid such impacts. Therefore, for purposes of this discussion, for an alternative to be superior to the Project, it would need to reduce construction- related impacts. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative to the Project due to the reduction in construction activities, and reductions in overall building space. Specifically, this alternative would involve modifications to and reuse of the existing warehouse building, and construction of a new parking area in the northern portion of the Project site, rather than construction of two new industrial warehouse buildings. This Alternative would generate approximately 884 fewer daily trips compared to the Project. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would have reduced impacts associated with air pollutant emissions, GHG emissions, noise, and utilities and services systems. The Existing Warehouse and Additional Parking Alternative would meet some, but not all of the Project objectives, or would not meet the Project objectives to the same extent as the Project. This is primarily because the Project objectives are related to maximizing industrial development on the Project site that is consistent with the City's General Plan, and to constructing 'contemporary buildings. VI. FINDINGS REGARDING RECIRCULATION OF THE DRAFT EIR The City Council adopts the following findings with respect to whether to recirculate the Draft EIR. Under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, recirculation of an EIR is required when "significant new information"is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the Draft EIR for public review but prior to certification of the Final EIR. The term "information" can include changes in the project or environmental setting, as well as additional data or other information.New information added to an EIR is not"significant" unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect(including a feasible project alternative)that the project's proponents have declined to implement."Significant new information"requiring recirculation includes,for example,a disclosure showing that: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented. (2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. 39 (3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but the project's proponents decline to adopt it. (4) The Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15088.5.) Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. The above standard is "not intend[ed] to promote endless rounds of revision and recirculation of EIRs." (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 1112, 1132.) "Recirculation was intended to be an exception,rather than the general rule." (Ibid.) The City Council recognizes that the Final EIR contains minor additions to the Draft EIR in the form of revised and new feasible mitigation measures to further reduce the Project's less than significant air pollutant and GHG emissions and additional information clarifying the prior tenants and ongoing operations at the site. CEQA case law emphasizes that "`[t]he CEQA reporting process is not designed to freeze the ultimate proposal in the precise mold of the initial project; indeed, new and unforeseen insights may emerge during investigation,evoking revision of the original proposal."'(Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford(1990)221 Cal.App.3d 692,736-737;see also River Valley Preservation Projects.Metropolitan Transit Development Bd. (1995)37 Cal.AppAth 154, 168,fn. 11.) "CEQA compels an interactive process of assessment of environmental impacts and responsive project modification which must be genuine. It must be open to the public, premised upon a full and meaningful disclosure of the scope, purposes, and effect of a consistently described project, with flexibility to respond to unforeseen insights that emerge from the process. In short, a project must be open for public discussion and subject to agency modification during the CEQA process." (Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 33rd Dist. Agricultural Assn. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, 936 (internal citations omitted).) Here, the changes made to the Draft EIR in the Final EIR are exactly the kind of revisions that the case law recognizes as legitimate and proper without requiring or necessitating recirculation. The City Council finds that none of the revisions to the Draft EIR made by,or discussion included in, the Final EIR involves "significant new information" triggering recirculation because the changes do not result in any new significant environmental effects, substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, or feasible mitigation or project alternatives that the Project Applicant declines to adopt that would clearly lessen the environmental effects of the project. Notably, based on recommendations from CARB MM 2-1 was expanded in the Draft EIR and MM 2-2 was added to further reduce the Project's construction-related and operational air pollutant emission. Under such circumstances, the City Council hereby finds that recirculation of the EIR is not required. 40 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program BRIDGE POINT RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST Project File Name: Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Proiect Applicant: Bridge Industrial Prepared by: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: September 2021 Mitigation Measure No,J Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified for Monitoring Frequency I Verification Verification l Date/Initials Air Quality RR 2-1 During construction,the Contractor shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)Rules 402 and 403,to minimize short term emissions of dust and particulates.SCAQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant emissions not be a nuisance off- During plan site.SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be check and controlled with the best available control measures so BO B/C A/C that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in construction activities the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission i source.The Contractor shall provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a SCAQMD-approved Dust Control Plan or other sufficient proof of compliance with Rule 403, prior to grading permit issuance. Responsible Person Monitoring frequency ' Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 1 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - ResponsibleMitigation Measure No. Implementing Action MonitoringI Timingof I Method of I Verified / 'I for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date Initials RR 2-2 Architectural coatings shall be selected so that the - volatile organic compound(VOC)content-of t#g coatings is compliant with SCAQMD Rule 1113.This requirement Prior to issuance shall be included as notes on the contractor specifications, BO A of building C which shall be reviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga permits Building and Safety Services Department prior to issuance of a building permit. RR 2-3 The Project Applicant and/or future tenants shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 201 and Regulation II (requiring a Permit to Construct prior to the installation of any equipment that may cause air contaminants)as well as Rule 203 (requiring a Permit to Operate prior to the use of any equipment that may cause air contaminants). These rules and regulation are required unless the Prior to issuance Project's equipment or aspects are exempt under Rule BO A of occupancy D 219,which identifies those equipment, processes,or permits operations that do not require permits.The Project Applicant shall provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the SCAQMD-approved Permit to Construct and Permit to Operate or other sufficient proof of compliance with Rules 201 and 203, prior to occupancy permit issuance. RR 2-4 Building occupants shall comply with Rule 2202, Prior to issuance which provides employers with a menu of options to PD A of tenant D reduce mobile source emissions generated from Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 2 Bridge��R�c���mo�oP�e� | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No.'�KmpAemwemkUmg Action Responsible Monitoring Timing Of Method of Verified � I for Monitoring Frequency ) Verification Verification Date/initials employee commutes,to comply with federal and State improvement CAA requirements.This Rule applies to any employer who permits employs 2GUor more employees ona full orpart-time basis atavvorksite for a consecutive six-month period | calculated asa monthly average, unless otherwise exempt.An employer subject tothis Rule is required to annually register with the SCAQK8Dto implement an emission reduction program, in accordance with | subdivisions(f) and (0),that will obtain emission reductions equivalent toavvorhsite specific emission reduction target(ERT)specified for the compliance year. | | | | | RR 2'5 The Project shall be operated in compliance with established standards in Section 17.G6.O6O Odor, ! Particulate Matter, and Air Containment Standards,mfthe City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.These Prior to issuance standards address compliance with the rules and regulations of the air pollution control district and the 8O A of building C state Health and Safety Code related toodorous permits emissions, particulate matter,and air containment; noxious odor emissions;and restrictions on the emission of dust and particulate matter. | | | | | | MnW2-1 Prior to grading permit and building permit Prior toissuance issuance,the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall verify that BO 8/C of grading and A/C the following applicable notes are included on the grading � U | | | | | U plans and building plans. Project contractors shall buildingResponsible be | � � \ ��«��� / ��wm��r�� | ' , ` Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A'' With Each New Development A' On*�e|nspe���on � ' | CE: Oty Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B:Other Agency Permit/Approval B]: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction [: Plan Check � PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal(RepnrtqStudies/P}ans) UFC: Fire Chief nrdesignee | E: During Construction | K 3 | | i Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I for Monitoring , Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials required to ensure compliance with these notes and permits/during permit periodic inspection of-the construction of Rancho Cucamonga staff or its designee to confirm compliance.These notes also shall be specified in bid r documents issued to prospective construction contractors. • During construction activity, Project construction contractors shall ensure that off-road diesel construction equipment complies with applicable California Air Resources Board(CARE)emissions standards or equivalent and shall ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. • The following off-road construction equipment shall be CARB Tier III certified or better, by construction phase as shown: o Demolition/Crushing: • Boom lift ■ Concrete/Industrial Saws ■ Crusher ■ Skid Steer o Utilities/infrastructure: • Trencher o Building Construction: Responsible Person ( Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D:Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 4 | � Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ' Responsible monitoring Timing of Method of Verified| N�W�@st��N�e���me�W�./Umm��m������Nm��um | for Monitoring | Frequency | Verification | Verification | Date/initials � Forklifts � Generator Sets � Welders o Paving: pavers * Paving Equipment � Rollers o Architectural Coating � 0 Air Compressors * The following off-road construction equipment shall beCARB Tier\V Final certified or better, by construction phase as shown: � n Demolition/Crushing: � Breakers � Excavators � Ge n e rato r Sets � Rubber Tired Dozers o Grading: � Crawler Tractors � Excavators � Graders � Rubber Tired Dozers � Scrapers � o Utilities/Infrastructure: U * Excavators - - - Responsible Person | ' Monitoring Frequency 1 Method of Verification PD, Planning Director A: With Each New Development A/ On-site Inspection [E: City Engineer ordesignee 8: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval ! B]: Building Official ordesignee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check ! PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion O:Separate Submittal (Repo rts/Studies/P|ans) | U F[: Fire Chief ordesignee | E: During Construction � U Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I Responsible Monitoring ( Timing of I Method of Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification date/Initials ■ Skip Loaders/Backhoes © Building Construction ■ Cranes ■ Crawler Tractors ■ Laser Screed ■ Scissor Loaders/Backhoes ■ Skip Loaders/Backhoes • Idling of heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to two minutes and electrical hook ups shall be provided to support use of zero and near- zero construction equipment and tools whenever feasible. • Off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts(e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction shall be electric powered, provided that it is commercially available,which may be plug-in (electric)or battery powered. • Heavy-duty trucks used for dirt and material hauling during construction shall meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency/California Air Resource Board truck engine standard for Model Year 2014 or later. Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 6 / | Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Re���n���/ Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified | �����m���m&�e��wmeM0�. �Implementing�cK� » } Kor-`--� n0 \ Frequency | Verification`~�- - | Verifimation | Dome/UmitUals hHHA2-2 The Project Applicant shall include the following operational requirements in the final building design or / stipulate the operational requirements for building ! occupants,asappropriate: Pro*ect Design ° Make truck dock positions EV'veodybyinstalling | conduits at truck dock positions for future accommodation of light-duty and/or heavy-duty Prior to issuance electric trucks and charging stations. of building | Lease Aoreemnent and Om/nepOccuoantReouirements. permits ! w Those loading docks used by trucks with transport refrigeration units(TRU)as determined byacold BO A/D C/D storage tenant shall be equipped with electrical hookups(applicable to cold storage tenant lease agreements only). w TRUs entering the Project site shall beplug-in Prior tnissuance capable(applicable to cold storage tenant lease oftenant | agreements only). improvement | ~ On-site TRU diesel engine run time shall beno permits for all longer than 1S minutes(applicable to cold storage project tenants tenant lease agreements on|Y). or occupants * Service equipment e.8,yard hnst|ers,yard | equipment,| U ' ' / U powered by alternative fuels,electrical batteries | Responsible Person | Monitoring Frequency | Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection | CE:City Engineer or designee 8: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official ordesignee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check | PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/5tudies/P/and / UF[: Fire Chief ordesignee | E: During Construction | � ' 7 ! Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification I Verification Date/Initials or other alternative/non-diesel fuels (e.g., —_ propane)that do not emit diesel particulate matter, and that are low or zero emission. • Trucks and support equipment shall not idle longer than five minutes while on site. Biological Resources RR 3-1 All construction activities shall comply with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3511 and 3513.The MBTA governs the taking and killing of migratory birds,their eggs, parts, and nests and prohibits the take of any migratory bird,their eggs, parts, and nests. Compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code shall be accomplished by completing the following: • Construction activities involving vegetation Prior to removal shall be conducted between September 1 PD B/C construction/ A/D and January 31. If construction occurs inside the during peak nesting season (between February 1 and construction August 31), a pre-construction survey(or possibly multiple surveys) by a qualified Biologist shall be conducted within 72 hours prior to construction activities to identify any active nesting locations. If the Biologist does not find any active nests,the construction work shall be allowed to proceed. The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall Responsible Person ( Monitoring Frequency ( Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D:Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 8 | Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project � Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ����m��m V Timing of Method of ��rN0�� M�N0igatiow*�easwre0Wm.�Ummn��mm�m�0m����U�w I | —'----'—`=` | | | ' ~ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials document a negative survey with areport indicating that no impacts to active avian nests shall occur. |f the biologist finds an active nest on within the pre-construction survey area and determines that | the nest may be impacted,the Biologist shall de/ineateanoppropriatebufferzonearoundthe nest.The size of the buffer shall be determined by the Biologist,and shall be based on the nesting species itssensitiv�tytodisturbance expected | ^ ' | types of disturbance,and location in relation to � the construction activities.These buffers are typically]0O feet from the nests ofnon-listed species and S0O feet from the nests of raptors and listed species.Any active nests observed during the survey shall be mapped onanaerial photograph. Only construction activities(if any) that have been approved bya Biological Monitor shall take place within the buffer zone until the nest{s vacated.The Biologist shall serve asa Construction Monitor when construction activities | take place near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. Results U of the pre-construction survey and any l ' '� i - Responsible Person / ^ - MomNt»� Frequency ^ ` / � N����������erificaton PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection i CE:City Engineer ordesignee 8: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval | | BO: Building Official ordesignee C/Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal(Reports/5tudies/P|ans) UFC: Fire Chief urdesignee | E� DuhngCnnstruction ( � ' u � Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible oring ,X #ng of Method of Verified Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I �111 � for Monitors �, ;. Frequent I Verification f Veri ion Date/Initials . subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the Pr avner/fir and the City; - — --- monitoring report shall summarize the results of the nest monitoring,describe construction restrictions currently in place, and confirm that construction activities can proceed within the buffer area without jeopardizing the survival of the young birds. RR 3-2 All construction activities shall comply with Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code,which protect active nests of any raptor species, including common raptor species. Compliance with these codes shall be accomplished by completing the following: • If vegetation is to be cleared during the potential Prior to raptor nesting season (December 1 to August 31), PD B/C construction/ A/D all suitable habitat within 500 feet of the during construction impact area shall be thoroughly construction surveyed for the presence of nesting raptors by a qualified Biologist within 72 hours prior to clearing. If the Biologist does not find any active nests,the construction work shall be allowed to proceed.The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall document a negative survey with a Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 10 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests shall occur. If any active nests are detected,the area shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans with a buffer.The size of the buffer shall be determined by the Biologist and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, expected types of disturbance, and location in relation to the construction activities.These buffers are typically 300 feet from the nest of non- listed species and 500 feet from the nests of raptors and listed species.The buffer area shall be avoided until the nesting cycle is complete or until it is determined that the nest has failed. Results of the pre-construction survey and any subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the Property Owner/Developer and the City.The monitoring report shall summarize the results of the nest monitoring, describe construction restrictions currently in place,and confirm that construction activities can proceed within the buffer area without jeopardizing the survival of the young birds. Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D:Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 11 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible I Monitoring ( Timing of I M of I Verified 4�w. for Monii»g Frequency Verification Verifi" ion Date/initials ■ Although presumed absent, prior to development of the Project site,-a pre-constr owl clearance survey shall be conducted to ensure burrowing owls remain absent from the construction impact area.The clearance survey shall be conducted in accordance with the CDFW (2012)Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation which requires that two clearance surveys be conducted 14—30 days and 24 hours prior to any grading or vegetation removal on the Project site. If burrowing owls are observed on the Project site during the pre-construction surveys, a burrowing owl relocation plan shall be prepared and submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencement of vegetation clearing/ grubbing,grading, and construction activities on the Project site.The burrowing owl relocation plan shall outline methods to relocate any burrowing owls occurring on the Project site and ensure compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. If an active burrow is found during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31),occupied burrows will not be disturbed and will be provided with a protective buffer unless a qualified biologist verifies through Responsible Person Monitoring frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 12 | / � | Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ' �e���wm^��v ��mm����� Timing Of Method of Verified / N���a�onN�easwmwNm. Implementing Action I | | | | � ' for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials noninvasive means that either: (1)the birds have not begun egg laying,or(2)juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and | are capable of independent survival.The size nf the buffer will depend on the time of year and level disturbance as outlined in the CDFVVStaff Report. RR 3-3 All tree replacement, protection,and maintenance Prior toissuance | associated with implementation oƒthe Project shall be of grading � conducted in accordance vviththe nequirernentaset forth PD A permit/during QC \n Chapter 17.8Oof the Citya Development Code. | | | construction | | RR 3-4|n compliance with the[itv's Tree Removal Permit process(Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,Chapter 17.1G.O8O),the Property Owner/Developer shall obtain u Tree Removal Permit from the Planning Director prior tu Prior totree | remova[ PD B relocation, removal | � Conditions imposed by the Planning Director for replacement of removed trees or tree relocation shall be � completed by the Property Owner/Deve|oper.Cultural Resources RR 4-1 If human remains are encountered during the ' Prior toissuance conduct of ground-disturbing activities,Section 7050.5 of of grading | the California Health andSafety Code states that no PD/BO C permit/during [/D � further disturbance shalloccur until the County Coroner grading and has made a tionuforiginandd{spnsitionofthe construction | | U | ' | Responsible Person / M����mn�ng Frequency / '� ^ method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer ordesignee B: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval 8O: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D: Separate Submittal (Repo rts/Stu dies/PI ans) | U FC: Fire Chief ordesignee | E� During | 8 v ' ' u 13 ! / Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Action Aesponsible ( Monitoring 1 Timing of I Method of Verified Z r M ring Frequency I Verification Verification Date/Initials materials pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code.The provisions of Section 15064.5 -of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines shall also be followed.The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric,the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).The NAHC will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent (MLD).With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative,the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery.The descendent must complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials.These requirements shall be included as notes on the contractor specification and verified by the Community Development Department, prior to issuance of grading permits. MM 4-1 Prior to site preparation or grading activities, construction personnel shall be instructed by a qualified Prior to the start Archaeologist of the potential for encountering unique of demolition, archaeological resources and instructed on steps to take PD B A/D in the event such resources are encountered.This shall site clearing or include the provision of written materials to familiarize grading personnel with the range of resources that might be II Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 14 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible I Monitoring Timing of I Method of Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials expected,the type of activities that may result in impacts, and the legal framework of cultural resources protection. All construction personnel shall be instructed to stop work in the vicinity of a potential discovery until a qualified Archaeologist assesses the significance of the find and implements appropriate measures to protect or scientifically remove the find.Construction personnel shall also be informed that unauthorized collection of archaeological resources is prohibited. MM 4-2 In the event that cultural resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation and grading activities,the Contractor shall immediately cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery.The Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified Archaeologist(Project Archaeologist),subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga,to evaluate During grading the significance of the find and to determine an PD C and A/D appropriate course of action.All artifacts except for construction human remains and related grave goods or sacred objects belong to the Property Owner. All artifacts discovered at the development site shall be inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist. Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal Responsible Person ( Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 15 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program on 1'14c: �esponsible Monitor* Timing of =M od of Verified Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Acti Monitoring "Frequency Verification Ve4fkat,on Date/Initials affiliation (prior ownership),function,and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and ,Ahese -- artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner, as deemed appropriate. If any artifacts of Native American origin are discovered, the Property Owner/Developer and Project Archaeologist shall notify the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department and the appropriate local Native American tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission.The significance of Native American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the tribe (refer to MM 14-1 though MM 14-6 in Section 4.14,Tribal Cultural Resources).All items found in association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special handling(see RR 4-1). Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 16 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I Responsible Monitoring Timing of I Method of I Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts,shall be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above.The report shall include a discussion of the significance of all recovered artifacts. The report and inventory,when submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,shall signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to archaeological and/or cultural resources.A copy of the report shall also be filed with the Archaeological Information Center(AIC)at the San Bernardino County Museum and the Native American tribe,as appropriate. Energy RR 5-1 Construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with Section 2449,General Requirements for In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets, of the California Code of Regulations(CCR)Title 13, Motor Vehicles. During grading Section 2449(d)(2) limits idling times of construction BO C and A vehicles to no more than five consecutive minutes. construction Adherence to idling limitations shall be confirmed through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials. Geology and Soils RR 6-1 In accordance with the City's Building Regulations, Prior to issuance as contained in Title 15, Buildings and Construction,of the BO B/C of building A/C Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,which includes permits Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 17 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No.,/! enting Action I Res for Mo blv Monitoring �'irr+ing of I Met of Verified nitoring' Frequency on Verific Date/Initials adoption of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC),all construction on the Project site-shall cot ply avfth €W_ -and the amendments and exemptions to the CBC that the City has adopted.This Title requires site-specific investigation and establishes construction standards and inspection procedures to ensure that development does not pose a threat to public safety. RR 6-2 All grading operations and construction on the Project site shall be conducted in conformance with the applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading Standards During (Municipal Code Chapter 19.04).Grading operations shall BO B/C construction A/C also be consistent with the recommendations included in the Project-specific Geotechnical Investigation prepared by SCG for the Project. RR 6-3 Development on the Project site shall comply with Section 17.66.060 of the Rancho Cucamonga Prior to issuance Development Code,with regard to dust control. BO B/C of building A/C Specifically, "no dust or particulate matter shall be permits/during emitted that is detectable by a reasonable person without construction instruments." RR 6-4 In accordance with Chapter 17.56, Landscaping Standards, of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Prior to which establishes minimum landscape requirements to PD A approval of site C/D control soil erosion, among other purposes,development plans on the Project site shall submit preliminary and final Responsible Person Monitoring.Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 18 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Monitoringl0mming of Mehhodmf VerifiedMitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I Vor0ylomitmriFrequency�� | � �w�mc� | Verification . | Verificm%,om | Date/Initials landscape and irrigation plans as part nf the design review process(Section 17.ZO.04Oof the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code), | *WNH8'1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the Project Applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City,a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Monitoring Program (PR|MMP).The PR|WqK4P shall include the provision ofa qualified professional paleontologist(or his or her trained paleontological monitor representative)during on-site subsurface � excavation of Quaternary(i.e, early Holocene and late | Pleistocene)alluvial-fan deposits,as outlined below. � � �e|ectionofth� pa|eonto|oQi�tsha|| besubjec1�oapprova| � Prior tothe of the City nf Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director,or � PD Q/C/D issuance of D | designee,and until the paleontologist has been approved by the City. grading permits The PR|K4K8P shall include the requirements below. * Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities in areas identified as likely tocontain paleontological resources shall be performed bya qualified paleontologist orpaleontological monitor. Monitoring shall be conducted full time � in areas of grading or excavation activities that | occur in undisturbed exposures ofQuaternary � U (ie,early Holocene and late Pleistocene)alluvial- Responsible Permmn | Monitoring Frequency� | , . Nerifimmtimw PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On'she Inspection [E: City Engineer ordesignee B: Prior to Construction 8: Other Agency Permit/Approval BU: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check � PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal(Repo rts/Studiey/P|ans) UFC: Fire Chief ordesignee | E: During Construction | 3 19 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No.j Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring limit ,pf Method cif Verified for Monitoring. Frequency I Verifi n I Verification Date/Initials fan deposits at a depth of 12 feet and below in G order to mitigate any adverse impacts(loss-of destruction)to potential nonrenewable F paleontological resources. For grading and other earth disturbance activities at depths between 5 and 12 feet below the surface, periodic spot checks for potential paleontological resources shall be conducted. Periodic monitoring shall consist of approximately 1 to 3 scheduled site visits per week by a paleontological monitor during construction ground disturbance. If significant fossils are discovered during a spot check,full-time monitoring should be initiated.3 • Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediment that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates.The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface,or if they are present,are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency JMethod of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 20 ' | | Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project / Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ��������U������ Responsible �� / riming of Method of Verified I for Monitoring Frequency' / Verification | Verification | Damp/initials paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. ~ Recovered specimens shall be prepared toapoint of identification and permanent preservation, including screen-washing sediments torecover small invertebrates and vertebrates, ifindicated by the results of test sampling. Preparation of individual vertebrate fossils is often more time- consuming thanforaccurnu|ationsofinvertebrate fossils. • All fossils shall be deposited inanaccredited institution,such asthe San Bernardino County Museum,that maintains collections of paleontological materials.All costs ofthe paleontological monitoring and mitigation program, including any one-time charges bythe receiving institution,are the responsibility ofthe Project Applicant. ° The Project Paleontologist shall prepare nfafinal � monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary maps and graphics toaccurately | record their original|ocation(s).Aletter U documenting receipt and acceptance of all fossil | | | | | V ° Responsible Person _ Monitoring Frequency ` _ � , -| ' � Methodof Verification | PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A/ On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer nrdesignee B: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval 8O: Building Official ordesignee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal (Repo rts/Studies/P|any) / � FC: Fire Chief ordesiQnee | �� Durin��onstruction | U , . . 21 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified forMoWtoring Frequency Verification I Verification I Date/initials collections by the receiving institution must be __.included-in the final rem. The repo -- submitted to(and accepted by)the City of Rancho Cucamonga, shall signify satisfactory completion of the project program to mitigate impacts to any nonrenewable paleontological resources. Hazards and Hazardous Materials RR 8-1 The Project Applicant shall comply with the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, as administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation,which governs During the transport of hazardous materials and wastes. Vehicles FC C/E construction A/B transporting hazardous materials are required to comply and operations with the regulations, as implemented by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). RR 8-2 The Project Applicant shall comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA),the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and the California During FC C/E construction A/B Accidental Release Prevention Program,where applicable, and operations which collectively manage the transport,storage, use,and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. RR 8-3 The Project Applicant shall comply with Section 17.66.040, Hazardous Materials, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code to ensure that required FC E During A/B/D information is reported to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire operations Protection District, as the regulatory authority. Businesses Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency ( Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 22 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. ��m��m�Un Monitoring riming Method � N���a�om*�maswmmNo. Implementing Action `| ���R��'---- |nitoring �re�w��u� | '---g�Verificatiom ] Verification Date/Initials required by State law to prepare hazardous materials release response plans and Hazardous Materials Inventory Statements shall,upon request,submit copies ofthese | plans, including any revisions,tothe Fire Protection District. Underground storage of hazardous materials shall � comply with all applicable requirements and shall comply with the procedures for notification outlined inthis section. | | | | | RR 8-4 The Project site is within the Airport Influence Area /A|A0 established by the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan(ONTALUCP). Construction activities and future development shall be implemented in compliance with the following applicable requirement identified in the ONTALU[P: Prior to m Real Estate Transaction Disclosure. In compliance certificate of with Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for pD D occupancyfor D LA/Ontario Airport's(ONTALU[P~s)Overflight buildings and Policy OZ,a Real Estate Transaction Disclosure is tenant required for all development within the Project improvements site.State Law(Business and Professions Code Section 11U1O) provides the following disclosure � language: ! NOTICE OF AIRPORT 8V VICINITY. This property b | U | | | | | k / U presently located/n the vicinity ofmnairport,Responsible Person | Monitoring Frequency Method of Verifitation .' PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection [E: City Engineer ordesignee 8: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Pians) UFC: Fire Chief ordesignee | E: During Construction � 8 23 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Monitoring "fiming of Verified Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action for Monit frequency Verification Verification bete/initials within what is known as an airport influence area. For that-reason, the propertY subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations(for example, noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you. Hydrology and Water Quality RR 9-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity(Construction General Permit)applicable at the time a grading permit is Prior to issuance issued.The Property Owner/Developer shall prepare and of grading implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan BO A/B/C A/B/D (SWPPP),which must include erosion-and sediment- permits/during construction control Best Management Practices(BMPs)that will meet or exceed measures required by the determined risk level of the Construction General Permit,as well as BMPs that control the other potential construction related pollutants.A Construction Site Monitoring Program that Responsible,Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D:Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 24 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program _ Monitoring �� Method of Verified / N���;�Gmm��eaaupe�Wo. Umm��m����m��m��m I Responsible — | | '-'-'=' i | ^ implementing �» m�������� | �r��w���� ( ����c��mw | ��n��m���n | Date/initials identifies monitoring and sampling requirements during construction ba required component nf the SVVPPP. Evidence of compliance with the NPDES Construction | General Permit shall be provided to the O1y'a Building and i Safety Services Director prior to issuance ofagrading permit. RR 9-2 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with Section 19.20.J6O,Water Quality Management Plan,nf the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,which requires that all qualifying land development/redevelopment Prior toissuance ! projects submit and have approved a water quality i BO A/B of grading D management plan(VV[lMP)to the City Engineer onaform permits provided by the City.The VVC\W4P shall identify all 8k8Pyto be incorporated into the Project to control storm water and non-storm water pollutants during and after construction. RR 9'3 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with Chapter 19.2Oof the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which|s the City's Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinance and which During i provides regulations to comply with the Clean Water Act BO E A/B | operations � (CVVA),the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality i Control Act,and the NPDES permit for San Bernardino County.This ordinance prohibits the discharge ofspecific Upollutants into the storm water; regulates connections to | - 1 ^ ' Responsible Person | ��xm�on�n�FnequmnwV / � . '. ^.Methmd of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer nrdesignee B: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval | BO: Building Official ordesignee C:Throughout Construction [: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal (Repo rty/5tudies/P|ans) ' UF[: Fire Chief ordesignee | E� Durin�Con�truction | U r ' ' u 25 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 'MetResponsible I Monitoring I Timing of Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action hod of I Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Hate/Initials the storm drain system; and requires development projects to implement permanent BMPs on individual sites to reduce pollutants in the storm water. Noise MM 11-1 Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall review the plans to ensure the plans require the installation of a minimum 6- foot-high temporary construction perimeter noise barrier ' Bernardino alongthe Project site's boundary with the San e a d 1 rY County West Valley Detention Center.The location and following specifications for the noise control barrier shall also be included on the plans: • The noise control barriers must present a solid Prior to issuance face from top to bottom. BO B of grading or A/C • The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of building permits the following materials with no decorative cutouts or line-of-sight openings between shielded areas and the noise source: o An acoustical blanket(e.g.,vinyl acoustic curtains quilted blankets orequivalent) , q attached to the construction-site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 26 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project � Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Mitigation Measure No.'�Umplementing Action monitoring Timing of Method of Verified I for Monitoring Frequency ) Verification | Verification | Date/initials o Any combination of construction materials satisfying a weight ofat least 4 pounds per square foot of face area. The noise barriers shall be maintained,and any damage promptly repaired.Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier ovopenings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. The required barrier shall be installed prior toany construction activities commencing on-site and shall remain in place until construction activities have been completed.The construction contractor shall allow for periodic inspection by the City mf Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the required noise barrier remains in place until completion of construction activities on'siLe. 0AK8 11-2 During all Project site construction,the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' During grading standards.The construction contractor shall place all BD C and A stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise construction is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site.The construction contractor shall U aUnvvforperiodic/nspectionbytheOtyo of Rancho | | | | | 8 . . ����� | � - | . .~ m f Verification Responsible-- / Monitoring Frequency / .__ -- -, PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection [E: City Engineer ordesignee 8: Prior toConstruction B:Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official ordesignee [Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal(Repo rts/S\udies/P|ans) . UF[: Fire Chief ordesignee | E� Dur/n8Construct/on | � | ' ' ' » 27 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible 1 1onitoring ( Timing of Method of I Verified for Monitor ing Frequency Verificatin Verification Date/Initials Cucamonga to ensure compliance with these requirements. _— Transportation RR 13-1 During construction activities,work within streets, sidewalks, and public places shall comply with: (1) Title 12.03, Public Improvement Construction,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,which requires an Prior to issuance encroachment permit from the City and adherence to the of building current edition of The Standard Specifications for Public CE B/C A/B/C Works Construction (Green Book),and (2)the California permits/during construction Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). Application for the permit shall be made as part of the respective plan check process and prior to any work on public areas or rights-of-way. RR 13-2 In accordance with Chapter 3.28,City-Wide System Fees for Transportation Development,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, prior to the Prior to issuance issuance of each building permit,the Property CE A/B of building C Owner/Developer shall pay applicable city-wide permits transportation development impact fees to the satisfaction of the City Engineering Department. RR 13-3 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with Prior to issuance Chapter 17.78,Transportation Demand Management,of PD A of tenant C the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,which improvement requires the provision of amenities or programs to permits Responsible Person Monitoring frequency E = Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 28 � ! Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified | for Monitoring | Frequency | Verification | Verification \ Date/initials encourage the use of alternative modes of travel by employees; patrons;and visitors of commercial, industrial, office,and mixed-use developments.These may include, but are limited to shower facilities, preferred parking, bicycle storage,video conference facilities,transit improvements,and other measures to reduce vehicle trips | ^' ^^^ ~^'These facilities-- ---shown ''the site / improvement and building plans submitted to the RR 13-4 In accordance with Chapter 10.56,Truck Routes and Restrictions,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,commercial vehicles and vehicle combinations described in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vehicle Code, or their successor provisions, three tons shall use designated truck routes. Non-during the permit process,and vehicles which exceed a maximum gross weight of During designated truck routes shall be used only asnecessary CE [/E construction A for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries ofgoods, and operations wares,and merchandise from orto any building or structure located ona city street or for the purpose of � delivering materials to be used in the repair, alteration, | remodeling,or construction of any building orstructure upon a city street for which a building permit has Upreviously been obtained. - | | ' ' ~ | - - � Responsible Person / Monitoring= � _ ,"=���`�n" / ' ` � �--^—�^~~ ~`~~�~^~~ ' PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection [E: City Engineer ordesignee 8: Prior toConstruction B:Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal(Repnrts/Studies/P|ans) UFC: Fire Chief ordesignee | E: During Construction | U 29 / Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No.f Implementing Action Res nsile monitoringTimingof Method of °; Verified for Monitoring Ii`requency I Verification I Verification bate/Initials RR 13-5 Work in the public right-of-way along 4th Street in the City of Ontario shall_comply with Title 7_Chanter 3_ prQr to the Public Rights-of-Way,of the City of Ontario Municipal issuance of Code,which requires an encroachment permit from the CE B/C building A/B/C City.Application for the permit shall be made as part-of permits/during the respective plan check process and prior to any work construction on public areas or rights-of-way. Tribal Cultural Resources MM 14-1 Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the Project Site,the Project Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation—the tribe that consulted on this project pursuant to Assembly Bill A52-5618(the"Tribe"or the "Consulting Tribe").A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Prior to issuance Rancho Cucamonga prior to the issuance of any permit of grading necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.The PD B/C permit/during A/B Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve ground-disturbing construction activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring,grubbing,tree removals, boring,grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching,within the project area.The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide Responsible Person Monitoring frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 30 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of ! Method of 1 Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification I Verification 1 Date/initials descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations,soil,and any cultural materials identified.The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground- disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any tribal cultural resources,construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 50 feet) until the find can be assessed.All tribal cultural resources unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by the Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe and a qualified archaeologist if one is present. If the resources are Native American in origin,the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate,for educational,cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project Site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease,and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health&Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section Responsible Person ( Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 31 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I Responsible todrit Timing of Method of Verified 1 for Monitoring Moriltairing Or en Verification Verification Date/initials 5097.98(d)(1)and (2).Work may continue in other parts of the Project site while evaluation and,if necessary, mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible,treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin (non-TCR)shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. MM 14-2 Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or cremation,and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects,called associated grave goods in PRC During grading 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. PD C and A/B Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any construction discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency 1 Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D:Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 32 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of ! Method of Verified I for Monitoring Frequency Verification I Verification Date/Initials excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours,the NANC and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. MM 14-3 Upon discovery of human remains,the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant shall immediately divert work at minimum of 100 feet and place an exclusion zone around the discovery location. The monitor/consultant(s)shall then notify the Tribe,the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who shall call the coroner. Work shall continue During grading PD C and A/B to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the construction remains are human and subsequently Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American,the coroner shall notify the NANC as mandated by state law who shall then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). MM 14-4 If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation is designated MLD,the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy During grading shall be implemented.To the Tribe,the term "human PD C and A/B remains"encompasses more than human bones. In construction ancient as well as historic times,Tribal Traditions Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D:Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 33 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 'Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action I Responsible I Monitoring Timing of 1 Method of � Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials included, but were not limited to,the preparation of the soil for burial,the burial of funerary Xrts w th_tha deceased,and the ceremonial burning of human remains. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. _-- Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. MM 14-5 Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on During grading the same day,the remains shall be covered with muslin PD C and A/D cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy construction equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available,a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe shall make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. Responsible Person Monitoring;Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 34 i i Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified for Monitoring ' Frequency 1 Verification , Verification i Date/initials If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials shall be removed.The Tribe shall work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully,ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe,documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches.Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes.Cremations shall either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC.The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains,funerary objects,sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure container on-site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery.The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency ( Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B:Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D:Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 35 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of of Verified for Monitoring l Frequency 1 Verification IMethod Verification Date/Initials at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity.There _ - --- shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. MM 14-6 Native American and Archaeological monitoring during construction projects shall be consistent with current professional standards.All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification,or separation of TCR's shall be taken.The Native American During grading monitor must be approved by the Gabrieleno Band of PD C and A D Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. Principal personnel for / Archaeology must meet the Secretary of Interior construction standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. Utilities and Services RR 15-1 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and Prior to final constr ucted to me et the applicable cable requirements ements of the ma approval or pp q p Pp Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD) Municipal Code issuance of and City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. CE A/B building B/D Approval of the plans by the CVWD is required prior to permits, final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever whichever occurs first. occurs first Responsible Person g Frequency----- Method of Verification po Monitoring Fre uenc PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 36 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project ' Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. � ������ �����v� Timing m� Method of ���� 0���a�on��easure�Wo.�Ummz�m�o�m�U������m I | | ^,`^ | | ' - V�x��������@ � Fr��w�m�� � V�c��mtk�� � Venfimation ��D�b�YVm�Ua10 � . RR 15-2 Landscaping associated with the Project shall be implemented io compliance with Chapter 17.S6of the City ufRanchoCucamnon8aDeve|opnn�ntCode,vvhichnequires / | preparation and review of landscape and irrigation plans during the Design Review process, Pursuant toSection During design 17.56.O]0(8>oftheUeve|opment[ode,�heOna/ PD A/B [/D ` ' review landscapeha d irrigation plans shallbe prepared in substantial compliance with the preliminary landscape and irrigation plan approved by the designated approving by a registered licensed Landscape Architect and shall be RR 15-3 Landscape plans prepared for the Project shall be in compliance with Chapter 17.82,Water Efficient Landscaping,of the City Rancho Cucamonga Development i Prior to issuance | Code,which includes requirements for development of a PD A/G of building C water budget, landscape design guidelines, soil and permits / grading requirements,and a requirement to use recycled | | | | | � water. | | | | | RR 15-4 Demolition and construction activities on the Prior toissuance | Project site shall be conducted in compliance with of demolition, requirements of Chapter 8.19,Construction and grading, and Code.Demolition Waste Collection,of the City's Municipal CE A/8/D building [/D / Construction and demolition waste shall be made construction available for oeconszruczmn,salvage, and recovery prior permits/after U to demolition. |ndusiveofthe wecovenedandsa|va�ed | ! | construction | | U | � ~ ( | i �p��s�� / Monitoring Frequency r � _ ` Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection [E:City Engineer ordesignee B: Prior toConstruction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval | BO: Building Official ordesignee [:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain ordesignee D:OnCompletion D:Separate Submittal (Reports/Stud(es/P|ans) � UF['' Fire Chief or designee i �' Durin8Construction | U p / � / U � 37 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No. im lementi Responsi ( Montoring Timing of Method of'`f Verified g 1 p ng Action far Monitoring Frequency Verification Ver, on Date/initials materials,all construction and demolition projects are required to divert a minimum of 65%of the tonnage _ _— generated as a result of the project from the landfill Prior to issuance of each Demolition or Building Permit, a "Form CD-1 Waste Management and Recycling Plan" shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department. RR 15-5 Development shall comply with Chapter 8.17, Refuse, Recyclables and Green Waste Collection, of the After issuance City's Municipal Code.The collection and disposal of CE E of occupancy A refuse, recyclables or green waste shall only be conducted by entities issued a permit to do so by the City,with permits certain exceptions,as identified in the Municipal Code. Conditions of Approval Requested by the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians(SMBMI) Cultural Resources CR-1 In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer)shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find.Work on the During grading other portions of the project outside of the buffered area PD C and A may continue during this assessment period.Additionally, construction the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department(SMBMI)shall be contacted, as detailed within TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D:On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 38 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implementing Action Responsible { Monitoring Timing of Method of ( Verified for Monitoring frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find,so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. CR-2 If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources,as defined by CEQA(as amended, 2015),are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured,the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment During grading PD C and D Plan,the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for construction review and comment,as detailed within TCR-1.The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. CR-3 If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project,work in the immediate vicinity(within a 100-foot During grading buffer of the find)shall cease and the County Coroner PD C and A/B shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety construction Code§7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1 The SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted,as detailed in CR-1,of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project During grading PD C and A/D implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find,so as to provide Tribal input with construction regards to significance and treatment.Should the find be Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A:With Each New Development A:On-site Inspection CE:City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction i 39 Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure No./Implemen Action Responsible Monitoring . ng of Method of I Verified for Monitoring Frequency Verification Vet` ' Won Date/Initials deemed significant,as defined by CEQA(as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring andTreatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI,and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan.This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. TCR-2 Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project(isolate records,site records,survey reports,testing reports,etc.)shall be During grading supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for PD C and D dissemination to SMBMI.The Lead Agency and/or construction applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency E Method of Verification PD: Planning Director A: With Each New Development A: On-site Inspection CE: City Engineer or designee B: Prior to Construction B: Other Agency Permit/Approval BO: Building Official or designee C:Throughout Construction C: Plan Check PO: Police Captain or designee D: On Completion D: Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) FC: Fire Chief or designee E: During Construction 40 a 46 Conditions of Approval RANCHO C,tiCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE ��>rMM&^ r'^ ►n1TJn (c a 12121 v TO v01►R cc.16C I: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report SCH No. (2020100056) and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program. 2. No more than 10% of the building space shall be used for high-cube cold storage warehouse space, consistent with analyses conducted in the Environmental Impact Report. 3. Use of natural gas and installation of required infrastructure is prohibited and any modification to this prohibition may be subject to additional review under CEQA. 4. No sort use shall be operated on the Site during the operation of the project. A sort use means a fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as defined in the ITE Manual, and as further described in the project's Draft EIR. 5. The final hydrology shall be submitted to City of Ontario for review and approval. 6. The project will need to obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Ontario for any proposed work impacting City of Ontario right-of-way including, but not limited to, traffic control. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 8. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 9. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Project#: E RC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, RC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E.DR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE Aa_ua .�fi_GO CONDITlONs>4 12121 Y TO-Y-1 IQ j2w JrCT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 11. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee pursuant to CDFW s current fee schedule, including all County processing fees. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Department within 5 days of the approval of the project by Planning Commission/City Council. 12. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 13. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business that is approved by this Minor Use Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Minor Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the necessary discretionary body prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensification of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review by the City. 14. This project ill, subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, in accordance with Development Agreement DRC2021-00180. The applicant shall be required to install art onsite pu suant to Development Code Section 17.124 with a minimum value of $200,000, pursuant to Developme' t Agreement DRC2021-00180. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development 'project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 15. This tentative! tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 16. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 17. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 2 of 23 a ` Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE Al U-9N &Q- rnArnIT AI-S a vv1 v TO YOUR vQn 1crT• Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 19. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 20. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 21. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 22. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 23. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include all applicable Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 25. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 26. The proposed public street shall be named Catherine Bridge Place. This street name shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 3 of 23 J Project#: D RC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE @W � i�ill�11 r C-0- AWIT/OiNS-A 12121 Y TO-Y-01IR PRn I= T: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high wall. For this project, these walls shall be constructed of poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the building setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 28. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The applicant", shall construct a public street along with east side of the project between 4th Street and 6th Street. Tho public street shall be a full width Industrial Street meeting the City Standard Plan 100-A. 2. (At-Grade Cr ssing) This project shall construct at-grade crossing improvements through the rail road along 6th Street. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the 6th Street at-grade crossing from future developments as they occur on APN: 0229-283-79. 3. The street ligihts shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of streetlights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 4. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change/ Periodic Increases- Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Police Impact Fee www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 4 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE kaP9 l�S�'r= /'`GAIAITIPIILIC ACC1 V XQ Y-0110 DOl1 10-1- Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. 1) Electric: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and RCMU requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU's proposed underground electric system will be located off of Etiwanda Ave and Sixth Street East of the proposed development. 2) Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require the developer to install a 1-4" UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage of the development (along the South side of Sixth Street) along the project boundary along with a 3'x4'x3' pullbox on each end of the route and into the project boundary. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 1-2" UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit and/or vaults shall run into each of the development's individual telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 6. The applicant shall modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of 4th Street and the Barrington Avenue to incorporate the new public street into an offset intersection with Barrington Avenue controlled by a single traffic signal. Furnish and install new traffic signal equipment as necessary per Caltrans standard plans and specifications plus 2019 revision, and City standard drawings. Furnish and install the necessary infrastructure to connect the signal to the adjacent signals at 4th Street and Etiwanda, and 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenues. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 5 of 23 I Project#: D C2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, D C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE A529 &G C0-AWITIONS APPLY—TO Y-01IR PRn I=CTs Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for review plans for improvements identified below, these improvements shall be completed no later than issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the project's first building. 1. At the intersection of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill Blvd. A. Modify the traffic signal to optimize coordination timing along Foothill Blvd between the 1-15 and East Ave and implement a 140-second cycle length during the PM peak hour. B. Submit to the City fair share contributions to construct the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a third westbound through lane in the amount of$37,089. 2. At the intersection of the 1-15 southbound ramps and Ontario Mills Dr./4th St. A. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn lanes. B. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn lanes. 3. At the intersection of the 1-15 northbound ramps and 4th St. A. Modify the existing traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length. 8. Bus Stop: The developer shall construct a new bus shelter at the existing bus stop along the project frontage on 4th Street to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The design of the bus shelter shall be consistent with the design of the project. The developer shall also evaluate the existing bus stop along 4th street, located at the easterly frontage of the project, for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the bus stop does not meet current ADA regulations, then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the bus stop pad for compliance. Design shall be completed, and improvements secured for prior to issuance of a Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on 4th Street 44 total feet on 6th Street 66 total feet on the proposed Industrial Street(full right of way width) 10. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. Printed:10/21/2021 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AA����'���= rnNnIT ONS a cvL v TO YOUR con 15CI: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided where necessary ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved, for the utilities which serve both parcels, including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm drainage. 12. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 14. A lot line adjustment or a map shall be approved among the existing parcels meeting City Development Code requirements, prior to issuance of Building Permits. 15. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 16. Prior to approval of a lot merger, lot line adjustment, or a final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LIVID 313, SLD 1 &SLD 6 among the newly created parcel(s). 17. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts and or Community Facility District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. NOTE: The parcels are currently annexed into LIVID 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6. 18. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 7 of 23 Project#: C2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AUUUM&G C 0- AWITJ GUS APPLY TO Y-01IR PRQ WET: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: 4th Street Curb &Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy Street Lights: Per City Standards Street Trees: Per City Standards Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer Street Name: 6th Street Curb & Gutter: Remove and replace as determined during design A.C. Pvmt: Grind and overlay as determined during design Side-walk : Remove and replace as determined during design Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy Street Lights: Per City Standards Street Trees: Per City Standards Bike Trail: Class II Bike Lane or as required by the City Engineer Street Name: roposed Industrial Street Curb & Gutter; Per City Standards A.C. Pvmt: Per City Standards Side-walk : Per City Standards Drive Appr.: Per City Standards and City Driveway Policy Street Lights: Per City Standards Street Trees: Per City Standards Other: Modification to exist signalized intersection of Barrington and 4th to provide signalized access to new Industrial Street. Signal modification plans subject to review and approval of City Engineer. Notes: (a) Where applicable, median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21I2021 Page 8 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE��F9—a—"- = C-QVWT 0- AM 412121 v Tn vn1 w vvn 15CT- Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A security shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 9 of 23 Project#: D C2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, D C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AME 9 �1G-00NDJTIONS RIPPLY TO-Y-0110212Rn I=''T- Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: 4th Street Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia Common Name: Min. Grow Space: 30 Spacing: 30 Size: 15 gallon minimum Qty.: to be determined during design Street Name: 6th Street Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora Common Name: St Mary Min. Grow Space: 20 Spacing: 20 Size: 15 gallon minimum Qty.: to be de rmined during design Street Name: Proposed Industrial Street(both sides of street) Botanical Name: Magnolia grandiflora Common Name: St Mary Min. Grow Space: 20 Spacing: 20 Size: 15 gallon minimum Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed:10/21/2021 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 23 -- - --- — L--_-- Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE ���� ^ rnNn1TjnA1c a 12121 v Tn v01 Q ccn Icrr- Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 24. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 25. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 26. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 27. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 28. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 29. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior walls of all normally occupied buildings. Ponding design specifications for Building 2 appear to exceed the maximum allowable depth for onsite storm water retention. This Condition was acknowledged in the Responses letter posted Aug 27, 2020. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 11 of 23 Project#: C202 -00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE A5-P9 NGONDIT AI-3 RIPPLY TO Y01'R PRC1.EeT: Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Existing parcel 22928351 is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD 85-1). Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Special Districts Division at (909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to complete the annexation. The annexation requirement will not be considered complete until the applicant begins the annexation process and Special Districts notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started. 3. Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 4. Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center. 5. Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 6. Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 7. Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 8. Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 9. Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 10. Plans for the public,, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 11. Plans for the 4 racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 12. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 13. Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 14. Plans for the temporary access and/or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 15. Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. vwvw.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 12 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE ABUZZ �+� _G COUDITJONc a 1112121 v TO v01 IR vvn Icr-r- Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site. Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards, an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code. 17. Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 18. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 19. Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com. 20. Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months. 21. Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 22. Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 23. Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 24. High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 25. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. www.cityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 13 of 23 Project#: D RC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EIDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE O-C-^nNDIT nA1s Al2J21Y TO Y-01 JR PRn JECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 26. A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates. 27. A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane). 28. Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the shrubs and trees. 29. A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 30. All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via hftps://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4gdxhs4tpl 3c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xwyU-a?dl=0 31. Roof access its required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to th' Documents section. 32. Street addres and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 33. Fire apparatUls access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs and/or other ! pproved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard has been uplo ded to the Documents section. 34. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment anJ devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section. 35. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 14 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AU- end-"� G CQ- 10ITICNS APPLY T� Y4UR 12R0- JE�T: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required. Disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of California published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400'. Connection to the public sewer will be required. Utility easements may be required if water and sewer are from 4th street to serve building 2. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. vwvw.cityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 15 of 23 Project#: D RC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E' R - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE Abu-a Air C0 WIT AIS APPLY TO Y-01 IR 12020J6CT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 13. The applicant, shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 15. This project hall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 16 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE k-U—b—M1G-CONLUTIONS-JI PPLY T-YTUR 12RGIE�T: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 17 of 23 Project#: D C2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, D C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE @1�P96MI&G. CONDIT AIS RIPPLY Tom^--YOUR PRO MC-1- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signers and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide ',inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 24. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 18 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AMBMA ii= C-GAIDIVOUS a 12121 v TO v01 w vvn IcCr- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 30. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 31. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 32. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 19 of 23 Project#: RC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, RC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EbR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE A —2— 6-C0- AWIT/CUVS RIPPLY TO Y-0I IR PR: WCT: Grading Section Standard Conditions,of Approval 36. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 37. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP"section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed': copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix) D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommenda ions, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management j Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 40. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Oernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 41. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) may be prepared as a Phased WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural devices may be constructed as construction progresses. 42. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed:10/21/2021 www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 23 I� Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR- Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE A629950kQ rnIrnITjnAIe a 12121 v TO v01 Io IRRO MCI:- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 44. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 21 of 23 i Project#: C2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, D C2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: E R - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST- 022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE.&-f-99.I1.ifG-001XINCNS APPLY T-0Y-0oIR IRRO 1JE T: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The deed for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot a `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adlequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must of be, used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity(77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to i vater q ality land uses or activities. e. Class V njectior wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular repair or maintenance activities, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, s P ecialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural !infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 22 of 23 Project#: DRC2020-00202 DRC2020-00213, DRC2020-00265, DRC2020-00266, DRC2020-00267, DRC2020-00312, DRC2021-00180, SUBTPM20271 Project Name: EDR - Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga Location: 12434 4TH ST-022928350-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map ALL OF THE AME "n rn WITJnAt 412121 v Tn vnUc can 161T: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/21/2021 Page 23 of 23