Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-11-10 Supplementals
GRESHAM SAVAGE Paige.Gosney&GreshamSavage.com San Bernardino Office (909)890-4499 - fax(909)890-9877 C.rry 0F R4 yCy®CUCA,�1/�f�'�A November 9, 2021 NOV 09 2®2� RECEIVED e �� VIA E-MAIL: Elizabeth.Thornhill®cityofrc.us A rpNG AND U.S. MAIL Yf Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission Attn: Elizabeth Thornhill, Exec.Planning Asst. City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Proposed Street Network (November 10,2021,Planning Commission Agenda Item 1312) Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission: This fine represents Tree Island Steel("Tree Island") in connection with its ownership of the property located 12459 Arrow Route (the "Property") in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's ("City") legacy Southeast Industrial Area ("SEIA"). Tree Island and its predecessors have operated a steel wire manufacturing business on the Property for nearly sixty (60) years. The purpose of this letter is to express Tree Island's significant concerns with the City's proposed General Plan Update ("GP Update") as related to the proposed street network expansion within the SEIA. The GP Update states that the existing SEIA street network is "at or near capacity" and therefore a significant expansion of the existing circulation network is necessary to accommodate future industrial development in the SEIA. (GP Update, Figure 3-11 [Focus Area 8: Southeast Industrial Area].) The GP Update includes a diagram of the City's proposed new SEIA street network, which includes several new north-south and east-west connectors throughout the SEIA and the Property ("Proposed Street Network"). Although the Proposed Street Network is described in the GP Update as "recommended" and for "illustrative purposes" only, the legal effect of this characterization in the GP Update is unclear given that the General Plan functions as the land use constitution and bedrock planning document of the City. The Tree Island Property is a relatively small parcel in comparison to the surrounding properties in the SEIA, including the Commercial Metals Company parcels located adjacent to the west and south and the Goodman industrial warehouse site situated to the east. However, Tree Island and the Property would be no less significantly F%\ RI RN tRDIN0 550 East Hospitality Lane,Suite 300 • San Bernardino,California 92408 401 West A Street,Suite 925 • San Diego, California 92101 ✓ GreshanlSavage.com al1]5-M--4181866.1 Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga November 9,2021 Page 2 impacted by imposition of the Proposed Street Network than its neighbors insofar as the addition of these streets would directly affect Tree Island's current steel wire manufacturing operations and, in addition, would limit the ability of Tree Island to sell the property for a different industrial use at some point in the future. Furthermore, contrary to the GP Update, there is no basis or support that we have seen for the City's claims that the current SEIA street network and infrastructure is inadequate to support the existing industrial uses, including Tree Island's operations and the Goodman logistics facility, or that the Proposed Street Network will mitigate transportation impacts related to the future development of the SEIA.1 The existing complexities of installing new streets and roadways in the SEIA is further complicated by significant utility infrastructure, railways, and heavy industrial legacy uses,none of which are accounted for or even discussed in the GP Update or the associated environmental document. There is, in short, no legitimate basis for imposing a "solution" on the SEIA where no actual or verifiable problem exists to be solved. Moreover, in conjunction with the City's recent adoption of Ordinance No. 982 establishing new and updated industrial development standards in the City, industrial stakeholders were advised that the City was planning to move away from the adoption of a specific street network and would consider the necessary infrastructure as it obtained additional information and as individual projects came forward. In that regard, and as part of Ordinance No. 982, the City adopted "Block Network Parameters for Public Streets", which provides a pathway for a master plan approval to "vary or waive the traffic standards identified in [the Block Network Parameters] if the city council determines that doing so would not frustrate the underlying purpose of the subject standard(s) or cause a significant impact on public health, safety, or welfare." (Dev. Code,§§ 17.22.020.C.3.ii; 17.36.040.C.9.a.ii.) The adoption of the Proposed Street Network as part of the GP Update would be contrary to and directly contravene the City's recently adopted Ordinance No. 982 and, in particular, the provisions referenced above regarding the "Block Network Parameters for Public Streets" and master plan approval regulations. If the Proposed Street Network is approved as part of the GP Update, then the City lacks authority under the Development Code's master plan provisions to deviate from or "waive" compliance with the street network layout for sites affected by the Proposed Street 1 The Proposed Street Network appears to function as an internal circulation system only that does not provide meaningful circulation relief to the larger SEIA network,inasmuch as no east-west connection is depicted to relieve Arrow Route and any north-south connection would require crossing the BNSF main railroad line and use of the Southern California Edison ("SCE") property located to the south, which does not appear possible given the significant dedications and easements from SCE and BNSF to establish the connector. The Proposed Street Network fails to provide any contiguous connectivity through the SEIA r508-000-41818662 Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga November 91 2021 Page 3 Network, including the Tree Island Property, unless a General Plan Amendment is approved as part of the underlying project entitlements. For the reasons outlined above, Tree Island strongly opposes approval of the GP Update with the Proposed Street Network. There is no data or information supporting a justifiable need for the street network expansion or confirmation and proof that the addition of these streets and connector roadways would effectively mitigate traffic congestion and impacts associated with future development of the SEIA. Furthermore, the grid pattern of streets proposed for the Tree Island Property and surrounding parcels would interfere with and inhibit both current business operations and future redevelopment of the Property and region for new industrial uses. We appreciate the City's consideration of these concerns and look forward to working cooperatively to ensure the continued vitality of the SEIA as the City's and region's core industrial center. To date, City staff has not engaged Tree Island in any meaningful capacity. We look forward to presenting our position and perspective. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, Paige H. Go y, of GRESHAM S AGE NOLAN&TILDEN, A Professional Corporation PHG/tdg cc: City Manager,John Gillison* City Attorney,James L.Markman* City Planning Director, Anne McIntosh* Client* (*via e-mail only) T508-0 -01818M2 Planning Commission November 10 , 2021 SUBTPM20317 Project Overview Project: A request to subdivide an existing 8,993 square foot office building on Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 17939 into 4 suites with a separate property title for each unit. Entitlement: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20317 Zoning Designation: Industrial Park (IP) District General Plan Designation: Industrial Park Project Background • Parcel Map 17939 was approved by Planning Commission on December 13, 2006, to subdivide the original project site into 8 parcels of land; • All eight buildings were also approved by the City Planner on that same date; • There is a shared parking and common area maintenance agreement between the eight office buildings that make up Parcel Map 17939; • The owner of each unit will also have an undivided interest in the common area of the building consistent with the provisions of the California Condominium Act; • Ownership of all 4 suites will remain under the ownership of the current property owner for the time being. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4� Location -a 6TF# STREET +FONIh�Afli�• I ,� VICE W SUBJECT SITE _ �- 5" -STORY {]fFII E OFFICE � 1 IG: IP-HAO L 35' HIGH 35' HIGH z fO 2 2•STOPY 1 SIOi�Y � >_ ZONINC: IP-HAOD , h11A1C�. IP-HriU❑ IL i s EL Z UFF ICE 3flGH I r IL 35'HIGH m STORY .I.STORY-• 0 TRH ONING_ IP-HAOQ+ _- * v JA � r I PROPERTY LINE OFFICE 35'HIGH } 2 SIUHY E - lMt-1. IP-HAOb 35' HIGH s ' CAL SCHO 2 S IOFRY 5"HIGH• - 40A11NG TP HAU -STORY IG: I P-F4AODJM I M EMA M ' � • u Irk= , p EISEN Dll Ia 4 1 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r j 1 ypyy — �' a w �h4 xs r• '- y r � r Location I P I 111111011,111 V! All _ _ .,. _ - - • ..�: ._.: ..max Project •• Inland Empire -� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r Parcel Map IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCH 1URN�,�snynrE��srmes re�x COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.20317 BASIS OF DENtfNG� PAPG8L30P PAXGBL MAP N01�999 AS SHOwN ON NAP RBCORt)8�IN 800K 22]Ph689 99 iHROWH•SOP MRCBL MAPS auw/wnie�.R-tia�'xA rrep mw rmx w.n��ru xaxo.ms oP snx srRrvnvurva couxrr,cnuswwu SITE anamE55DRs�5�PARLtl_NO-� � a��rrvwrrcrx&inr. .nuuuav,xv� xs GEOw571RKY 4 UNITS 4a � FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 7 7A A RF6 F- NORTH iC VICINITYP 77=ir `i :� � sr>•e�eurtolNc owxER: ��o-.'a'A��' Z V 1 Q ,n""S;;n Q Q sir neenz mca s w m�r,s®r.a �-�� Cnp `011DRE1.1 w J� a w O am-ai9xn v.u.mae wx wxr a raa a TOTAL BIDC AREA ,�, a Iti I POR PAR-A" s PM 17030 PMR 2Z2/39-42a „ a PARCEL 3 suITE I&S 51ITE zoo PM 17080 11�i?aFS W�+ 5 PMH 222/3D-42 r uiw—fa oc-man �m N � 46N a�w —m PARCEL�1 FIRST FLOOR sccnmo Ftoae"AN � unau o x x — - P. se.�' �ia�iwneu �un�iw.x.o�e�� � Mm a rr�rierr POR PAR"A' •-[] -'., ���� TENTATIVE PARCELAIAPNC.20377 CITY O RANCHO CUCAMONG POR PAR -A" 5.4K ® G ! Environmental Determination • Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); • The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities; • The project scope is for the subdivision of an existing commercial building into common interest ownership where no physical changes will occur. Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action : • Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20317 at 9377 Haven Avenue Place through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions . 4' x i r IF Q*N Ar .fF N.-sk - f,• , 11, Pr .X 116 y- ,. "Z ti F t�r x F I 47,Twt�.. Rancho uca mon a PLAN C g enera I PI n- RC G a U ate R �r Planning Commission Hearing 1 k , r le November 10, 2021 VO Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update What is a General Plan?, • State-required "constitution" of the City • Establishes the City's vision and priorities for the next 10- 2 E years • Guides future actions (policy choices + development applications) • Preserves and enhances community strengths • Addresses several topics of concern • Enables the community to come together to develop a shared vision for the future • 8 required Elements or Topics: 1. Land Use 5. Conservation 2. Circulation 6. Safety 3. Housing 7. Open Space 4. Noise 8. Environmental Justice CucamongaRancho Plan Update WhyUpdate the General Plan? • Update existing General Plan • Address critical topics affecting Rancho Apply what learnings from the past o Economic development Address emerging trends & ideas o Housing • Hold a "community conversation" about the o Wildfire risk future o Mobility • Address new State requirements o Health and equity Community character and sense of place • Integrate the General Plan with other documents o Resilience from the Covid-19 Pandemic and processes • Focus on implementation and clear decision- making � � W'W. r r �f Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Existing Plan Review + Conditions Alternatives Adopt Review existing policies Create and refine land use and reports, identify Public and decision and transportation makers to review and issues and opportunities alternatives adopt the General Plan Update \\ `L 0 ti Listening + Policy + Plan Visioning Development Develop long term Develop policy solutions => vision and guiding to address a range of principles for the Plan topics COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS c Throughout the process, the community has _ ra _ Cucamonga pdate LL been invited to engage via robust online ' ' - ' ' Series i surve s virtual workshops, zoom meetings, PLAN x y , p , g , =pfy y out pop-ups, social media, videos & more p '°'�♦' r yr5 aalsY yo ;Qar`' — PLANRC a; I I I What do you like about Scenario B? PLA� 4 relates to"man"'in" I ' ' T H E GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Future reinvestment/rhonge is more ensfoc and Meeralong the Foothill and Haven corridors and 0,Victoria Gardens and Melrolink Station It provides more housing choices,retail,and jobs along Haven c DRAFT PUBLIC REVIEW It presides more housing choices,retail,and jabs along Pohill i It provides more housing choice,retail,and jobs at Victoria Gardens ,T = It provides more housing choice,retail,and job around the Melrolink 6�A — ` M The character/images shown are what I'd like to see in the future DAY 2 - TUESDAY, JUNE 30TH other —•--� ---•--- None of the above Moo am-lo3 Healthcare. Exercise l WE NEED YOUR FEEDBACK o fo 20 sG ao so 60 i Moving Beyond Healthcare.Exercise&Food-A Healthy Community that Supports Diversity& Inclusion Number of Responses n 17:00 am-12:30 pm:Discussion Group 2 SURVEY#1 Land Use,Focus Area,and Mobility Providing Housing for All-Seniors.Young Professionals.and Essential Workers SURVEY#2 Housing,Open Space and Public Facilities • 2:00pm-330 pm:Discussion Group 3 SURVEY#3 Resource Conservation,Safety and Noise PW _ �o ..,,.�._«.. .. ..Y,M Building a M - - - T r � •�®®�0\ MORE INFO, I r r l P l ,•�®®v®®® un— r FEEDBACK POLL OPEN Which al thefollowingwere most influential in our evaluation of the Scenarios.(select up to 3)_4 • • • • .mot :__ - I.Protecting the natural environment and resources UNTIL NOVEMBER 25TH 2.Providingfarawideavayofhousingchoiceto.11— - PLAN __ people to stay ne in Lawn .11— CityofRC.us/GeneralPIan(Plan . T 3.supporting new transit opportunities e:g�a roam.c.�.usam„" CITY lGriffin Spr CITY I Jean Ward CITY I Jawn Wel �� a 4.Providing for economic development and job growth $.increasing citywide equity and health r r --- 6.Providing forwalkable shops and restaurants mm..yge, y � r�um..wnm..m< MINIM r 3, 1 - -_. 7.Supporting outdoor recreation and open space/parks ea•.bom. ",;;i°;"nx�,en e,,..�. - _ s.Improving quality of life mwya aim„urn.w�.n n.,.. 9aNCN0 Rancho Cucamonga Update Roadshows + Social Media + Videos + Short Surveys + Email Blasts + Website Updates Weeklong Zoom Info In Person Stakeholder Forums on Virtual Sessions & pop-ups: Worksho Webinars: Interviews Our Future p� Draft KEY COMMUNITY TOUCHPOINTS #1 & #2 Character Draft General . lot General Plan Plan Online Virtual Three-part Online Online Discussion Online Survey: Visioning Visioning Groups: Survey: Considering Survey Survey #2 Our Options Considering Draft #1 Our Options General Plan DISCOVERY VISIONINGPUBLICLAND USE & MOBILITY SCENARIOS 2020 Sept-Nov 20202021 rr� 2,300+ MEETING PARTICIPANTS 18 19 LOCAL GROUP � MONTHS The General Plan expresses r views ONLINE SURVEYS 15,000+ 11 ® WEBSITE • � VIEWS rtr• • values INFORMATIONAL - VI DEOS STAKEHOLDER from • INTERVIEWS • �� Rancho 'I 2�700+ VIRTUAL WORKSHOPS, SURVEY MEETINGS,WEBINARS& Cucamonga 1.1 MILLION+ RESPONSES POP-UPS community ! SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS EMAIL BLASTS (636,000+VIEWS) Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update IGuiding Community Themes QUALITY OF LIFE MOBILITY JOBS HOUSING NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES COMMUNITY & CULTURE EQUITY f F - - *r X 11 ACTIVITY CENTERS HEALTH RESILIENCE & SUSTAINABILITY r �r r Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update General Plan Organization VOLUME 1:VISION PLANO VISION&CORE VALUES..........................4 s RC Q CONTEXT........................................ 20 I C� ADMINISTRATION................................38 ROU LC�. VOLUME 2: BUILT ENVIRONMENT 66 - LAND USE&COMMUNITY CHARACTER..........52 FOCUS AREAS................................... 98 ® OPEN SPACE....................................134 MOBILITY&ACCESS.............................146 l'_ Q HOUSING........................................180 PUBLIC FACILITIES&SERVICES.................186 VOLUME 3: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE - RESOURCE CONSERVATION ....................206 QSAFETY..........................................230 NOISE...........................................250 City of Rancho Cucamonga GENERAL PLAN VOLUME 4: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY OGENERAL PLAN WORK PLAN...................266 All America Ciiiq RANCHO public Review Draft Q PLACEMAKINGTOOLKIT........................304 IIIi CUCAMONGA 2 0 V 2 0 May 2021 1t' ENVI PON MENTAL JUSTICE STRATEGY..........392 iLA— INN- Volume I : Vision RC *oo Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update V ision and Community Values Build on our success as a world class community to create an equitable, sustainable and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive. HEALTH Y a . 1 J EQUITY Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Health i Ir 'A ILI Make choices about our community p that shape the places where we live, work and - - =_ j .., 14 play, and ultimately improve our chances for living long, healthy, fruitful lives. HEALTH Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update I Equity h Craft a city that allows everyone �=y' a� to have a fair and just opportunity to thrive, regardless of factors such as race, zip code, s �` gender, age, etc. EQUITY stewardship :s Efficiently utilize our inite non-f renewable natural and financial W" . . resources to resiliently rebound from environmental, economic and public health shocks. " ''� - - Volume 1: Vision Pancho Cucamonga General Plan Update DESIGN FOR PROVIDE PEOPLE FIRST CONNECTIVITY CREATE AND DESTINATIONS ACCESSIBILITY ESTABLISH RC AS THE ADDRESS CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC HUB OF JUSTICE THE INLAND EMPIRE Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update M m • • 1'1111' a�a• Ili. ,. - - .: '.v I�f`'- � � -. .. ..,. ,!b Will D sl i� i Mid Am — r A ah_ r Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Big Ideas � J) 9 VI D � rgNM r r-r J � IT Y !\N � Ac' r ��� J B J !I_r �l •� L �Pr� �' � � 'mod � ''�. r �•�� .'��• � •., ..• • �,.� .;'• ���� ..... -` � - - /1 w. rri mi Irf lill IYI EIII lul f1 r .. � ` ., y�as '�"� — �•' .�, _ �,ICI ''Irl Irl t^.I II" IAI L.il Il�ll Y�e�. x Lee •��':_ Big Ideas CREATE DESTINATIONS i _ 4 i i Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update M m • • AkkJAMOL • A6� f � P n � v l Y a.. e� K x f i Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update M m • • AIN I , 1 dl VW ,III �`, 1 T I ��• - m Volume 1: Vision Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Putting the Plan Into Action FIGURE V-1 DEGREES OF CHANGE MAP I ;J I T , wl,°°°°e - - -■� Limited Change n ■M No p ¢�i ■ Moderate Change Upland Base Line Rtl � Base Llne Rtl _ Fontana �� Ln°,ehsL Significant Change Ah St f , 4th SLw ntario Putting the Plan Into Action FIGURE V-2 VISION DIAGRAM LJ � I 1 COMMUNITY ACTIVITY NODES � I - Neighborhood Activity Node 2 q o E n G Corridor Activity Node _i 4m db Focus Areas MOBILITY CORRIDORS Upland o V i Fontana Transit Priority Street Chu-S1 1" Bicycle Priority Street pA ill Dlvtl NV- Trail Network v v ® 61h5t f — s Ontario ROOD' N ® 0 1.000' 5.000' 10AOP IT I!rLAINN- Volume Built Environment - RC too Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Land Use & Community Character • Describes and defines the distinct types of places ("place types") the City aims to create to achieve the community's vision • Unifies land use, community character and design into a single chapter to ensure uses, experiences, and activities maintain desired look, feel, character, and ambiance ,�• • Preserves the character and strengths of each neighborhood and a recommends appropriate change—small in some cases, larger inx .q r' others — n Place type designations go beyond conventional land use designations to better define the existing and intended character, form, and function of each part of the city. LandPlan FIGURE LC-3 LAND PLAN I LJ 1 NEIGHBORHOODS CORRIDORS ' Alta Lama `, Etiwanda Semi-Rural Neighborhood Neighborhood Corridor Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Traditional Neighborhood h+ City Corridor-Moderate j a Q v Suburban Neighborhood-VeryLow ■ City Corridor-High 0 ¢ w c / Suburban Neighborhood-Low CENTERS \` v a = E \ ti-------------------- Suburban Neighborhood-Moderate Neighborhood Center 6 ` n .�'f 19` St ■ Urban Neighborhood ■ Traditional Town Center v Pacific Electric Trail ■ City Center Upland 1 p BaselinePd ________a Cr / Central North I Fontana ................ .------ 1 J- DISTRICTS �` 1 .¢ I , Office Employment District � , Church Ste` c Yf� ed Hill" �; , 21'°'Century Employment District East4iCd. Neo-Industrial Employment District Arrow Route p Industrial Employment District 1 c I OPEN SPACES ---------------� Cucamonga 1 y 1 Central South _ -- Natural Open Space ate\ s i 1 Rural Open Space VhSt i 'u i Southeast: T U I 1 General Open Space&Facilities c ' 4'St ----��------ -A Also ntario Also available online at the City's GIS Open Portal: https.Ilbit.lyl landplan EnvironmentVolume 2: Built Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update General Plan Designations FIGURE LC-2 PLACE TYPES AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Semi-Rural Neighborhood Office Employment Traditional District Naighborhoo.d Neighborhood Neighborhood NaturaIOpen Corridor Center Space ■ iY 21s7l Century' Suburban i . Employment N.eighborhood -V • 7 ■ District Very Low ' ■ City Corridor Traditional. ' Rural Open ■ Modarat"A Town Canter' Space Suburban • Neighborhood • Neo-Industrial Low Employment District General Open Suburban Highh tyCor CityCente" Space & -Neighborhood Facilities Mode-rate Industrial Employment District Urban Neighborhood *Open Space Designations in separate Open Space Chapter Neighborhood Designations TABLE LC-2 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGNATIONS SUMMARY FIGURE LC-4 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGNATIONS MAP Non- Resideritial Target Use Irrt,ensigr General Phan Designation Density Resimsity MIX Ratio -- (DV}ACJ* (FAR) I Semi-Rural Max.2 NA loop LJ Neighborhood Traditional o � -----------�-------� Neighborhod Max.B Max.0.4 .90/20 Su ur�wNeigInborhood Max. NA loop i ALTA LOMA `,' ETIWANDA r y Wilson Ave I Wilson Ave ' 7 S�w N ¢' rban eighborhood Max.14 NA loop 1 v a L r Suburban Neigh Cborhood \ v a c ;Y Max -Moderate .TO NA loop \ F L _ u ¢` = i --------------- - Urban Neighborhood 20-50 0.2-0.4 80f20 ^----- w• - r�1!' 191�St 'See"Calibratin Cevelo ment7on a 60 firfurtherdetails on densiL intensity _ 9 P P 9e P P n9 % and use m&ratio � I - , Baseline Rd I • �� '- +, �� ,i' � � --------; CENTRAL NORTH ' �� Fontana I %i Church St � I ED HIL6�/;� I '�ASTSI E r- - --------------------------- A _ Arrow Route '� - CUCAMONGA I ---------------� I CENTRAL SOUTH ' Semi-Rural Neighborhood \\6°M1St ! i S0.U_T_HEA T Traditional Neighborhood I I Suburban Neighborhood-Very Low Suburban Neighborhood-Low Ontario Suburban Neighborhood-Moderate ■ Urban Neighborhood • Cucamonga General • • - Corridor Designations FIGURE LC-5 CORRIDOR DESIGNATIONS MAP TABLE Ill CORRIDOR DESIGNATIONS SUMMARY Nan- ---���r-----I Residential Residential Target Use Mix LJ General Plan Designation Density Ratio Intensity (DU AC)* (Res Nan-Res)[FAR} --- -- -------, � L_—,_.— I Neighborhood Corridor Max.24 0.4-0.6 70/30 I LTA Oill ETIWAND Wil on Ave I ' Wilson Ave City Corridor- Moderate 24- 42 0.4-1.0 70/30 `\ a m v �c iy r / Q City Corridor- High 36-60 0.6-1.S 70/30 �\ a = W *See"Calibratin Qevelo.pment" page details on applying density,Intensity, 19 �� 77 on a e60forfurthei deta' and use mix ratioi f p _ V I anp Baseline Rd �-- _-- Fontana Church St i -- ED HILot/ �,i /I i L Al 2L—. ST E R I I If _ Arrow Route I \-1 IRS,� UCAMONGA � - 1 ; CENTRAL SOUTH ==1 71 St i SOUTHEA�T 1 1 1 ' Neighborhood Corridor --i_-�4°^St ■ City Corridor-Modera. Ontario ■ City Corridor-High mi I 2000' N 0 Low 5.0W 101M ED Center Designations FIGURE LC-6 CENTER DESIGNATIONS MAP TABLE LC-4 CENTER DESIGNATIONS SUMMARY - —1 r r—r------7 r- -- ----I LJ I Residential Non- Target Use Mix ial nt General Plan Designation Density Residential Inten t Ratio it (DU/AC)- y(FAR) (Res/Non-Res) 1 LTA O A ETIWAND Neighborhood Center Max 24 0.2- 0.4 20/80 I' Wil nAve Wilson Ave Traditional Town c Center Max 30 0.2- 0.6 50/50 a E r > I = 3 City Center 40-100 1.0-2.0 50/50 �'� U a I W I j *See"Calibrating Development"on page 60 for further details on applying density,intensity, � �`-� St and use mix ratio. rl\` 1 � U am I ------------- l _ --; CENTRAL Fontana p Baseline Rd i �Churchjst -- ' I ED HI LIB, ' TSI E F _ I Arrow Route — �' ,n St cT UNION x` ■ Neighborhood Center 411St —�� \ - - ■ Traditional Town Cen;� Ontario ■ City Center -- 2,oW' N District Designations FIGURE LC-7 DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS MAP TABLE Lii DISTRICTS DESIGNATIONS SUMMARY Non Residential Target Use Mix General Plan Residential � I LJ Designation Density Intensity Ratio I I (DU/AC)* (FAR) (Res/Nan-Res) Office Employment 18-30 0.6-1.0 20/80 District I LTA LOMA ETIWANDA 2111 Century ! WII on Ave I Wilson 24-42 0.4-1.0 30/70 Employment �y— District \ � a • a � �' Ir Neo-Industrial • a �• 14-24 0.4- 0.6 10/90 L > I = 3 Employment District 2 = I W Industrial Employment District 0 0.4- 0.6 10/100 „st *See"Calibrating Development"on page 50 for further details on applying density,intensity. Upland 1 saselin R and use mix ratio, — \ ; ! ror► tna \\ ;' Church St --7 ED HIIV ASTS I li ■ I . .. ■ Arrow Route ___ - _ r ONGA r --------------- — CUCAM -CENTRAL SOUTH \ ^St i SOUTHli i i Office Employment District 4'^St ---------- 21-Century EmployrrVc District Ontario Neo-Industrial Employment District— industrial Employment District �— FocusAreas FIGURE FA-1 FOCUS AREAS MAP • Specific parts of the city where the ; j L 1 ~l j vision indicates focused change - ; LA r ' r r r ----- • ----�—�_` J� V • Near-term improvement is supported by i wr Ave y wosonAve L_ �._�. —r— N - — ---a-^ 7 c r a broad cross section of the community .71 Nry • Higher level of detail and strategic recommendations to prioritize these Upland 1 '� °afiE�K,ro o o Base Lin Rd "jump-start" _ Base One Rtl Fontana � ova I areas to help ump-startn implementation Foorfiul ewa reWal -_ A!(Ow Route I - r _ h This General Plan recognizes that the e gro value of coordinated I and public -.a �` � J 4th 5tinvestment is especially high in focused areas of the city Ontario —� - m 1 _ . Focus Area T., Downtown Rancho Cucamonga FIGURE FA-2 FOCUS AREA 1: DOWNTOWN RANCHO CUCAMONGA '' '• ♦e s • i i . e.....•o aYq! ti y ® ■!7!r!7!■ `�� -.9.9 a ;? i I f 1•7sn 9.. .'. II■ 1717111■■7 { �\ ,f s ss`ps+• t•swi•♦1 ■. ■ : ...... . r S r • . ■ ••i+ r■riG„Chum 1'..i l ♦ A ■■ 01 �?� - - �-��_ >ts♦ ♦'�■ ■Z� ♦♦P ■■ . � ■ r s a � 1 w � • �♦.+ ��♦ ' i � ■ 11■11111 I i � '��«.,..!_..�,�-.� =.. � _ Il�lllly, ♦s♦ii ■ ..® ti.■ ti.. a ��■� L<nmul 11 , �1■�j♦w`I r.' �����►� , . �1 ; •...., i a.ti i © ■■ Alt{ �■ {{1 y�� .I •.w IL -- ♦i I �♦��� ��`, <s. ♦♦♦, . r � ■ ■■ r��CI �ARf11eILlFR41� ���t�� _° % -�� J+:� � _ �� h - ° _ T��y' mom Ll \\� ■J f%��I� .� 1�+" .i i,�•+, d .. Q it■■■■ ■ �1 h Mainstreet L` / ram• J 1��' A ,,ly _ _� >. 3 ♦ ♦ ♦' r rrl r Ylrl .. on } ���f.`/ = .� �� ��♦\'�� % ��r.arr! ± V _ _ \1 ■ r r1� C ' ® i♦ o P9 g _ r��♦ , .." •�� , -------, Victoria Gar'ens 4( 5♦ ♦ ♦ a rrrfrrr Y 0♦ y �/�� �♦♦ `>Ri� 1♦� ,��`*�� a rr��pr�� � � I-'' �1 li �utm■pst==. � i�� ?li na ro ,y y i y p - ���� / ♦ 90 , w yy r — G1 /�`, `�♦�♦♦♦♦ jj ♦ O `siL` s r+•r+�Ks V I �111 ♦♦♦ I♦ ♦ 1 bhh"=1 � LS�lt��a! .. > Ivy--== I I � � i n o cunino �.9. � �. ���♦Ow♦/�♦�♦��♦ �d�•1 IIi■f� ■t; ,Krti7 p =S� r �m....•7 �1♦♦1�Q ©�+ar :r�M•/ e�_ ■ -r g Ve I ,, _ 1■ � ,,�� r 'n fjrii '` �.. - , u_ y ��•rr��■ �I VictoriaG A—Lan .. AAA I mom \ ■� i Fo11Id ■ Y a o thill Blv ��� 1 I� �■ ■ \ \•4 :„_ ` . .a a e���f�� 1 Q A rto■f 1' ©� ,■ 1 ■ �1 r 1 � 1 � � �I �. s L 1i1 � `_ l� V ♦ _ �• w ■�� i z 1", Existing Street T'A a! tMilleniu ct 0 lids: �:=.,[ 8< lO Recommended Street RCS ;_ _ Recommended Alley/Drive --- Q 1 ® p New Network Connection it p p _ ...... I ---- 1 / ¢�, ——— Recommended Multipurpose Trail �k ` 1 Epicenter 0 II 1 �` Recommended Trailhead i Ja�d£enn�---� Qa � NW1 1 Recommended Park/Plaza 1 Transit Priority Street Arrow Route �' ! 1 r` Bike Priority Street 1 I �I �■©� `J Recommended Development Pattern off moil =, [Oki 6 EnvironmentVolume 2: Built Plan Update Focus Area 29. Civic Center FIGURE FA-3 FOCUS AREA 2: CIVIC CENTER " H. IJ' i J L l 1 J 7 ! ` . `,��io'�ii.� ' `�/\\` N1ir1 Je J i ♦:ay - • oo... ■■� ____ � o ExistingStreet ©��,\/ � x4 �, �\♦ b■ul III � __, � �� - Recommended Street r Recommended Alley/Drive ;t//jj New Network Connection ■ w care, �� ' \� �•' MAL `�- ,\\ I111r;1. - Recommended Multipurpose Trail Recommended Trailhead / �Sta116n . ��\� "T /a���i�-�� s - Recommended Park/Plaza I \ '\ ♦ �• RalphM. s ---� , \� �I� / /A� .i Lewis Park Transit Priority Street 7 J-' gTerra Vista Town Center 1 Bike Priority Street �, ' � 4 Recommended Development Pattern / 1 % e " kt Foothill Blvd"ppOOOP +ti _�' /a * I �i•� ,II� �■ 1■ ■ . �th1�� B�VI . ,eel. �1 �,, - 9W 4-0 ■ �— r a II Hampshire St ,,ti �� � � ��� Eucalyptus Ave Y iieii ai a ■1 II I ¢ I� `a • ■ i i ■■I r / White ak Ave •��, r 4■ ■i ~ 'I•�li ---�-© / I oospit ,' - #' a< of aN Irl u 7a*YW t �— - , — � i■i.Y■irFri ic Center Dr O� • III In 1 11' I ■■ Ir'Ii�l'II,'• ■ ' ♦ ^ L0 �� 1�,�� dI1■•I� II , °e up/ y �Im�e■ rig i t♦♦ , - Il�i+■I+rlll �� ♦ L-- - t -I--- MEN w tool' . .CV J I� I ■ > • ■ Civic Center Dr 111 � ..-__•_-..._.- r t6 ■rV1Iro ..I ■ °/ ;li "•� ■r �r: © • I'I�I'I'I�I,I! a �r ,.�- 1 r . . o ._. > I 11i1� I w - fu _ �_ Arrow Route'111 a: I i r��I !I �! © - - ■ I _ � �• �1 .. ~' r °', _ �. rau�ul ■ � ra■ ra ra ra ra � � �- — — Volume 2: Built Environment Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Focus Area 3: HART District (Cucamonga Station Area) FIGURE FA-4 FOCUS AREA 3: HART DISTRICT .r 1,4 /4� ¢ 1 r l ■ j {�' _� r aP ■4 �7 1 1 z1 y a r Newport Dr t v Y 1 Atacla 5[■ -F J ]N St ]th5t c ,� IN A& ThE Res art W Q Existing Street Recommended Street 16th St . Recommended Alley/Drive 6� ? ` A� i , ■ Q New Network Connection f, t A . ���� + +� 1■���' � — ' ——— Recommended Multipurpose Trail i ' Recommended Trailhead Recommended Park/Plaza 111111111111111411111ttksr w+ �� S /•� i . ■ Transit Priority Street I _ ' i:�7 `+1 ' �`D Bike Priority Street 1 � -w 1i A`�� +; —I Planned BRT Route — i�_r ��i I 1����%;i ■ ~ 1 j� -----7 -- Planned Tunnel Connection ——— Proposed Transit Connection 0 Proposed Local Circulator(potential Ontario tunnel connection) - -r .. I Recommended Development Pattern EnvironmentVolume 2: Built Cucamonga . . Focus Area 4: Red Hill Gateway FIGURE FA-5 FOCUS AREA 4: RED HILL GATEWAY � � 1 F r. Y. ` Existing Street It ir ■ ■ I a r Recommended Street L. ■ Q Recommended Alley/Drive r Red Hill '0 !� r fi p; ;'� �, � � Q New Network Connection e( �*•"�=r� � � / rx " .�``• � � �' I •�� [ r Multipurpose Trail Red Hill 'b ■ Country Club Recommended Trailhead ® s &P { Recommended Park/Plaza c n ■ � 6 i. o ca U land v � H OdRsit Priori 1 T p rc 9i d NE! RecommaIQ4ed Development Pattern cic�dl N �. Foothill I •fir . i 1111111111111■ �s OoN '.— r �. • j 1 I— . 'J _ -r CM 10 l E:%a- Fes— MMy _ J / 1 ! _ ,�' � ,� � � �► � 1♦ 1 � _I— illy ��—� s '-'-'ill i Ranchbri: .fit`..*rl■ r � I 11 —— ♦r — — w• 'I i > :=::L©��•'+''� \fib e�t��w 0 "AN �► �1�11 I — =— — — F � — aI) +• P b M 11i IIU�111111� - ! 1�1 € z�r� Q�•: WWI Ir rEr+ II. \C Mlw I�I�II�nn rur�ilrl • �' O "1� 1� � ,.. N ++ �� is +■ ■ W � � :C 1 �\�� a �Oo a ■ Ii W ��+�s !,■ i �ti� V K..� i a % S cur ■■li•r�� illl■111� °ram V __0 46r , : J V a s �';���t ■.rnuu■ii !�.ELtI!■■11 • �� Focus Area So. Cucamonga Town Center FIGURE FA-6 FOCUS AREA 5: CUCAMONGA TOWN CENTER sMhl+ry-+• ���1�!!M7!! ■ ; a >w Mulberr1'e' rl A � �� � LJ■ YY r EducationnteP ! �I M -01 L �l�� Hiy r r �■■ tilr■r Mr � +��■!ill�jMNr!! r I■�F , -�tt'. I1 e'� _ � � �®: ,`,�"aCw•'� �1 ■;..�. ■rr■ia■�i/�■!i♦ +�� krow Route i■T ;' ! 1r� 1fi- rw I I 11,111 7r+ t1 - MIN 1����11�1 1 ,, + .'� 1 j ��• �� a r t � ■■ ' ■ Jr - •r ■ ■ ■ es me t �iru! 16 � z �' Afit� -0 a Cucamon9 © Elementary School , ■l .� ���■ Q a! . s ,h SIN _ —� ■ it 9RanchoCucamon a ■ ' ■ ' ` . " ■� 111 C a d : Middle School •,MIN Ell el awl V..z ■ ■■.■■.- FeronBlvd �. ■�M+1��e •yl■•y �� r a �� • t T I ' LU 71 � � � �� ■ •�!•.e.��•■ 2,q�a1Pr ��7��7i��4t] ��■1 .�V�� �" :� �'�� r�r.`� � .- cb•� T� �_ t 1 1 "Main St ■n 7,lio; • ••-• •��• •••Old Town ■ �� iS ■ ■ -�' �� ��1•���� �.�i r �2 �� �1 �� Park .•..■ •� � . -------_� ! r a �� ��• , ® �� ��� Existing Street 9 Recommended Street Private School < ,,. :•; , .� o Montessori �' Recommended Alley/Drive , •• ¢ y� _\\\\"T r r Recommended Connection -o --- Recommended Multipurpose Trail .- ' t ® Recommended Trailhead � Transit Priority Streetrqpqpqpqpp - Bike Priority Street r•l�+rA+-rY a w ■7�Vra!•!7■gp4 ± 0 �m Focus Area 6,,,, Alta Loma Town Center FIGURE FA-6 FOCUS AREA 6:ALTA LOMA TOWN CENTER 7 Existing Street ■ i 'TY ` £ � ■■�� � r � — �' ■���A��1 }-���':,` 5� f= `.� Recommended Street � Recommended Alley/Drive '' = VON f 3 r r�{ o Rec�l� ���ntion . .ti PACIFIC E -3T Multipurpose Trail ® Trailhead Rec ark/Plaza ®� ® ® 3 , 9' $ ,� t Lomita Ct Transit Priority Street ��, I 1W� Bike Priority Street ! R �� I , i ~� �� Ole Recommended Development Pattern G td-Memd Dr 1 , , 4* EL O O �,. ; _ W oil *own40 oil 016 lam .Q ■ to Ic a F . s ■. LN a I • • ir OEM Yy Q EnvironmentVolume 2: Built Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Focus Area 7e. Etiwanda Heights Town Center FIGURE FA-7 FOCUS AREA 7. ETIWANDA HEIGHTS TOWN CENTER Ali 0 Focus Area 8e. Southeast Industrial Area FIGURE FA-9 FOCUS AREA 8: SOUTHEAST INDUSTRIAL AREA KAN L. Arrow Route Q . le 1 3 �,' ' ; �� IM •� WhittrdmAve_ , _ .-'iir�•X ;i- Mrs —o�� i�►� z• Y - O f z x vl < I w w . J • �� U 1 G� •9 ' Napa 5t mi , r1 Rau Cho Vim — 1 ,. ......5 b t Lion } ■ � � "` � ,,_ _ Existing Street Recommended Street E ,��• N� New Network Connection �� I 1 ——— Recommended Multipurpose Trail © / Recommended Trailhead moo i - �• I� \ '�� ti Recommended Park e a. Q • ------ Transit Priority Street w 1 Bike Priority Street "►' Xy' r � a \��p� ' � Recommended Development 1 ' T O ' *As perstate law,these recommended road alignments - 1 1 are not intended to interfere with utility operations. Volume 2: Built Environment Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Open Space p • Intent is to preserve the natural environment, water courses, and rural areas of the city, as well as preserve and enhance park space for recreation • Plan makes use of large and small areas giving people the ability to enjoy the beauty of the city and foster healthy livings-►Y • Emphasis on connectivity to provide a variety of trails and paths - connecting open space with existing and new neighborhoods _ openspace FIGURE OS-1 OPEN SPACE DESIGNATIONS MAP u 71. 11 of 1• � �� . ��'� Upland �. �— ,. �,� f a �•;; i Fontana RJ Li I_ - _ - t�4. .a. � '_..y .�•-�.--..-----m^-^^^^�^m w«.„y� .. JR1� . ., ;:,,.-.. -- •- f 11-uxr_w+�l.y�^L Y��C'_.!1 �" 7-1 Natural Open Space "— J — - - P'uraI Open Space Xntano. _ ■ General Open Space&Facilities = _ Mobility and Access Mobility needs to connect people to places. This includes connecting residents to their employers, connecting residents to destinations within the city, and connecting the rest of the Inland Empire to Rancho Cucamonga T ; • Intent to provide for safe, enjoyable, and healthy through a balanced, - multimodal transportation network • Focus on repurposing or reconfiguring roadways to provide additional bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities • Goal to make Rancho Cucamonga the mobility center of Inland Empire: ird ➢ Brightline high speed rail connection - ➢ Boring Company's tunnel to airport ➢ Regional north/south transit connection from the Cucamonga Station to Riverside County paralleling the 1-15 corridor EnvironmentVolume 2: Built Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Mobility and Access FIGURE M-3 LAYERED ROADWAY NETWORK FIGURE M-4 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY Sen 5-ebrlel Mou nle lns San Gabriel Movnta' SA N BE RNA RDI NO NA TI O NA L F ORE ST SA N B ERNA RDI NO NA T I ONA L F Ai,RE ST �...�_._. .._,—, .— ..._..—.. .�I ------ p-- r.-.-------.� �'- 'll ' .- ,- I .— 1._1 r i i r L_� i ,,,ay i d ICanyon _. _ SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1 t)ee "� S P H E R E O F I F L lie::, Ft Wanda i anyor Canyon • i6'E a ne —! � i San — capyon sm CITY ® �� """ Canyon • Pavm rune Rd ! C I i Cany'I n�.,st c yenl ... - � �. i CITY OF FONTANA - --- - •FONTA NA Elk �.: .........avllanA.. . ... ! —_— — S chc aPma ey cenege -a. -�' - Cnarcey ''`> g aua q � �7 ... � ■ s g® �r •Y® mann - ••• . — _ J S.. vlaona st t CITY OF CITY OF .• .g..�.......... • UPLAND q " UPLAND M1 LiRd '%' �` La Ra �� j � � • bow, � r �nd� Gardens r J a a�llll.. i AThz g Tna o I E is " ♦ ' .Uro. `"✓ Epice n,er i • c...,,9W.st. s' xraev ewe 1 en wr„rarn sane v.Bailor , xaMw�ro same�Ra�lue .a ew Metro link® yy{ CITY OF ® CITY OF F ON TA NA FONTANA� 1 'am st tnst i sa•a.rnarelna nve Gan aernaralna nve .—..�..— ..—..—_.—..—..—..—..—..—..—.�.—._—..—..—� CITY OF CITY OF ONTARIO ON TA RIO 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Q 0 0.5 1 2 Miles O ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I I ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I I 1 1 1 Volume Environment Rancho Cucamonga Update Mobility and Access Mobility Hub Concepts High Density Area Along Streetfront ■Parallel Parking O Information Kiosk db Bike Racks ■Scooter Share ---A Rideshare (arshane Parallel Parking go Bikeshare j Q Transit Stop----- ... Sidewalk Parking Bike Route/ Bike Route/ Parking Sidewalk ,. Sharrow Sharrow "y I Medium Density Area around Community Space 0 Carshare and/or EV(harging Station--------------I ■ScooterShare---- --®Bike Racks ■Rideshare .__■Mkrotransit Diagonal Parking—; ■Information Kiosk Bikeshare j ®TransR Stop Sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Travel Landscaped Travel Travel Bike Lane Sidewalk ■Parallel Parking Lane Lane Median Lane Lane Sidewalk Bike Route/ Parking Bus Stop Bus Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Median Travel Lane Travel Lane Bus Lane Bus Stop Parking Bike Route/ Sidewalk "• - Sharrow Sharrow a1�k N - 'sgap has Uee•dese oped fore e o car.v.... n m.1'z fc r 1-1s."' aneC'and could beeppllcabk for the Gtyor Narrcho Cucamonga Volume Environment Rancho Cucamonga Update Housing • Housing chapter of General Plan provides overview, goals and policies. • State mandated analysis (Appendix to General Plan) provides an assessment of Cit 's housing needs and how best a. . :. to accommodate the housing needs of existing and future residents _ -�� ��� � =���✓� • More on State mandated Housing p Element Update later " Local governmentsadopt plans I provide �-- opportunities for housing development. I / I I housing planning • Rancho Cucamonga is identifying theS amount and location I new housing in the community. Public Facilities Goal is to continue to be a city where residents enjoy state- of-the-art facilities that support existing programs, - accommodate future needs, and are accessible to all members of the community i • Public facilities include the Civic Center, community sports complexes, family resource center, cultural and senior centers, fire stations, public works facilities, and libraries IT • Efficient and reliable system of public facilities and infrastructure is essential as the city grows • Policies in this chapter ensure that future growth does not negatively affect the facilities or reduce services Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update -r.•• jF .-rl s / 5f ' I¢g 1,•� Y. L ti.y•i3 ..{ f . Resource Conservation Addresses the use and stewardship of natural resources: Water Forests Soils Rivers and other waters Wildlife Minerals • Identifies water courses, flood corridors, riparian habitats, and land that may accommodate floodwater for purposes of groundwater - - recharge and stormwater management • Also addresses ' andtribalresources "1 would like Rancho Cucamonga] to be known for having the ideal balance between nature and infrastructure." - Community Member Volume 3: Environmental Performance Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update safety "Public safety needs to keep up with population growth; people want to move to a safe Identifiescommunity." Seismic • geologic h - - • — Community Member Flooding Wildland and urban fires • routes Climate adaptation Human-caus- • hazards Includes policies intended to reduce injury to people and damage to the city To implement policies, . • developed • d adopted: '1'T� �■ �• c.lN - -P a I Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) , . Community Wildfire Protection - •Evacuation Assessment air Volume 3: Environmental Performance Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update IdentifiesNoise • • from of • - I • Supports a pattern of • uses designed • minimize exposure of • to excessive noise. MA�yj �w • Includes policies to address existing and foreseeable noise problems • Establishes areas where more noise may be acceptable The approach is to differentiate between good noise and � - � ` ' ' yb'-- bothersome noise and to develop a city with appropriate noise � . ' :� �����- and vibration levels thatsupport a range of places from quiet - ,Y neighborhoods t 11111 o active, exciting districts Volume 3: Environmental Performance Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update ,rr i AN volume 4. L Is_ RC Implementation r �f Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update General Plan Work Plan FUNDING These measures are actions for the City to update fees or seek grants to implement policies in the General Plan. TABLE WP-1 FUNDING Action Item Work Group Lead 11ming Funding Opportunities Through Special Districts:Investigate the use of special districts for assistance in providing affordable • Guide that lays out specific actions and steps Community Development Short-Term housing,transportation improvements,parking,and shared amenities required to achieve the goals set forth in Transportation System Funding Opportunities:Monitor new methods,pilot,or test various solutions to the conventional gas tax and toll roads for more equitable system-wide approach to the General Plan. funding transportation improvements.Some examples include Community Development Short-Term volume-based pricing,smart metering,congestion pricing,and curb pricing. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding Opportunkles:In the short-and mid-term,explore and identify potential A funding sources or incentives for the following greenhouse gas reduction activities • Organized into the follow V topics: + Evaluate the feasibility of a local or regional Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT)impact fee program,bank,improvement Community Development Short-Term ➢ Funding program or exchange. + Identify funding for and create an Urban Forestry Master Plan. Community Development Short-Terra ➢ improvements + Investigate including tree planting in the capital improvement program and development fee structure as an offset for ➢ new development impacts to greenhouse gases and on the Community Development Short-Term Process & Information environment in accordance with the urban forestry master ➢ plan.Rules Q�CSC Coordination Investigate possible incentives for existing non-residential developments to install electric hook-ups for trucks in docks ➢ Focus Area Implementation bays,and parking areas to reduce heavy-duty truck idling on- Community Development Mid-Term site. ➢ + Investigate incentives for existing public and private developmentstoimproveenergyefficiency. Community Development Mid-Term Standard Conditions of Approval Hazard Retrofit Funding Opportunities:Investigate potential funding sources for risk reduction activities that may include: + The creation of a Geologic Hazard Abatement District that can Community Development Mid-Term be used to generate funds to mitigate geologic hazards + Potential funding opportunities for voluntary improvements/ Community Development Ongoing retrofits on private properties. + Possible incentive programs to encourage property owners to retrofit their homes/businesses against climate-related Community Development Mid-Term hazards such as extreme weather,flooding,wildfire,etc. + New funding sources for vegetation management activities for properties located within the WUIFA. Public Safety Ongoing Placemakin g Toolkit • Illustrates the types of development patterns, . ,:{ forms and strategies that will result in human- x scale, pedestrian-oriented places `" a 19.." Focuses on three high-priority topics: illljjjj 1) Activating the public realm 2) Rebalancing streets and public spaces - 3) Completing the community fabric s_ The Placemaking Toolkit is set of implementation tools to help ensure the making of great places of strong and enduring value Activating the Public Realm Mixed-Use Centers&Districts `nY,' � "' ,} _ 1 �� Illlfll 'r� I �III11" - y Frontage Setbac k Area Pedestrian Way LandwaW CurbsideLane Amenity Area Privnt+Frontage Public Awnt"M Neighborhood Centers&Edges +Ir n I I Curbside Lane Land9ca Pedestrian Frorta• 35�tback PSI 3 � r Amenitye. 'Nay Ok Public Fro"& Private Frontage �� � RebalancingStreets and Public Spaces { r } • t9' • 5 • 11' • 11' . 12' • 15' • 1T • 11' ► 11' ► S' + i Typical Existing CondFtlo Narrow sidewalk directly Fining 7-lane street Wth ex-sting buildingsset far back. _ Travel and Tuna Lmwa Typical Existing Condition:Wrdetravei lanes,especialiythe outer Lane,with minimal bike lane space • 7, + lop a t Ill + 11- + M, + 111' i 11' + 7' • Y / a Phase]:Reconfigure existing street,either by reducing travel lane widths or the number of travel lanes.to accommodate 14 appropriate public realm dimensions.Introduce frontage lane with on-street parking where adjacent development is expected. Drovide protected bike lane in-lieu of frontage Lane in the short term. .old a till 4-_ TrawalmW Turn Lames(reduced widths] Street ReUvFlt:Lanes are narrowed and reconfigured to accommodate protected bike la nes and on-street parking. 10' • • 1�' • t' . :-0� . x;• + 11' • 7' • The installation of pa rklets and med ian with street trees and landsca ping fu rLher improves the streetscape to create a Phase 2:Enhance existing sidewalk and provide new street trees and landscaping,if not already instal led,to create an comfortable and attractive environment for ail rsersp-edestria ns,cycl ists,a Ind motorism 3 ppropriatety,safe,attractive and cornfnrtabie public frontage environment to support new street fronting commercial buildings. k 0 else ] LW jL,7 ,_ �;• -. �i�► �� I�• - k�.� ,r ,.. I If MW 4 '�� ,I 'Y _ fir �a � R - -s4-■4• � .� h' �k. } I- ,4i1 ' � �.Y/� -i:/'�r�fY 'e�..r� Y"Yyr i J� ` �• I:k Jf5 - I.a� _ �!. • •� �k .v. ,f• r T'1 w. � •ffr 4 w� .: rl'y7+ .• _ +r� �.7 L�. ��i Volume 4: Implementation Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Environmental Justice Strategy With this General Plan ' Cit is strivingto reduce and i eliminate disproportionate burdens I living, ' participating and thriving in this city. • By law, the General Plan must address the following five health and environmental justice outcomes: 1) Reduction of pollution exposure 2) Improvement of public facilities 3) Promotion of food access YM d 4) Promotion of safe and sanitary homes -: bA I 10i 1 _ S) Promotion of physical activity or • Environmental justice goals and policies within each chapter of the General Plan, and organized in one location in Volume 4. a# ` ImplementationVolume 4: - Update State Mandated ,iL-AINN- 6th **. RC Update Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update IState Mandated 6th Cycle Housing Element • - --).W Differs from other General Plan elements: ➢ Subject to detailed statutory requirements and must be updated every 8 years ➢ Must be reviewed for compliance by � � -F i State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) � and adopted by February 11, 2022 ` _ ---- IRecent Housing Legislation • Focuses on removing constraints for housing development and facilitating production of new housing designed to expand housing options: > Reduce fees, relax development standards ,1 ��, (2019 : SB 330) Streamline processing procedures - by right approval of housing (2017: SB 35; 2019: SB 330, AB 1485, SB 9) > Objective standards for site plan and design reviews (2019: SB 330) HousingRequirementsElement • Provide a variety of housing types for all income Ir groups •.. • Assist in the development of lower and moderate a6 e income housing • Remove constraints to housing • Conserve and improve existing housing • Promote fair housing • Implements the RHNA (Regional Housing Needs •P Allocation) - - . e ?D Rancho Cucamonga Regional HousingNeeds Assessment Regional State Planning Counties Nearby Cities RC Final RHNA Agencies CucamongaRancho Fontana SCAG San Bernardino • , units Ontario 20,803 Upland Each jurisdiction must demonstrate in its Housing Element that it can accommodate its total RHNA number and its allocations by income level. CucamongaRancho Plan Update Regional iousingNeeds Assessment Income Group Total Housing Percentage of Units Units Allocated Extremely/Very Low 3,245 31 % Low 1 ,920 18% Moderate 2,038 19% Above Moderate 3,322 32% Total 103525 100% Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Note: The City has a RHNA allocation of 3,245 very low income units (inclusive of extremely low income units). Pursuant to State law (AB 2634), the City must project the number of extremely low income housing needs based on Census income distribution or assume 50 percent of the very low income units as extremely low income. However, for purposes of identifying adequate sites for the RHNA, State law does not mandate the separate accounting for the extremely low income category. CucamongaA goal of the RHNA requirements is to provide housing for all income levels Rancho Plan Update Meeting the PHNA Extremely Low/ Low Moderate Above Very Low (51-80% AMI) (81-120% AMI) Moderate Total (Below 50%AMI) (Over 120% AMI) RH NA 37245 17920 27038 37322 107525 Potential ADUs 36 56 56 12 160 Entitlements 0 0 27000 31085 57085 The Resort 0 0 2,000 0 2,000 Victoria Gardens 0 0 0 385 385 Etiwanda Heights 0 0 0 25700 27700 Remaining Need 3,209 17864 0 225 5,280 CucamongaRancho Plan Update A More Diverse Housing Stock Provides Opportunities to, • Provide housing options for young professionals • Attract young families with children with affordable options • Allow seniors to age in place • Allow more residents to live and work in Rancho Cucamonga r .Ve Rancho I = E CucamongaPlan Update Benefits to Complying with State Housing Element Requirements • Provides for housing choice and viable neighborhoods local• Preserves • • to regulate housing • Access to state funding • Avoids possible litigation and fines for ME ,� -�.j -��\ gas �3►, .zy ,� �F�s '� „�, z�,.>- 4 J Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update HCD Review and Next Steps • Submitted to HCD on June 3, 2021 and received Letter of Review from HCD on August 2, 2021 • Made revisions to achieve substantial compliance: ✓ Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) ✓ Housing Sites Inventory ✓ Local Processing and Permit Procedures ✓ Housing Policies and Action Items • Submitted Revised Draft for second round of review on September 2, and received Letter of Review from HCD on November 2, 2021 • Currently making final non-substantive revisions based on HCD comments for City Council adoption • Transmit final adopted housing element to HCD for 90-day review I!rLA- INN- Fiscal Performance - RC *oo w Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Fiscal Impact Analysis Fire Protection Revenue or Expense Item General Fund District • Analysis confirmed that the General Plan buildout program will result in a significantly Property $4,989,000 $18,872,000 $23,861,000 positive net fiscal impact Property $691,000 $691,000 (includingSales Tax 172 1/2 cent sales tax) '' $6,689,000 -- $6,689,001 • Expected to generate about $25.2 millionProperty Tax In Lieu of VLF $13,471,000 -- $13,471,000 net annual revenue at full build-out Transient ' $4,422,000 --�- $4,422,00 Other Recurring Revenues $5,220,000 $119,000 $5,338,000 MEF"W -, $2?01,00J • Cost of providing services for new growth in ' -- $477,000__ $477,000 TotalRevenues $35,482,000 �21,669,000 $57,150,00 the buildout program will be significantly lower than the additional revenue Expenditures generated by growth Sheriff's Department $13,499,000 -- $13,499,000 Fire Department $10,373,000 $10,373,000 Public Works $3,670,000 -- $3,670,000 • $4,384,000 EMIR. $4,384,009 ExpendituresTotal $21,554,000 $10,373,000 $31,927,000 Net Revenue $13,928,000 $11,296,000 $25,223,000 TotalNet Revenue as%of _ 39%I Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Value Per Acre Rarcho Cucamonga, ► TaxableValue per Acre o- ^►A r t � �• h � T' 7 r, , r 1" t `S 0.... 2021 VPA Model Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Y pp 6lii i'i�! ■■f,aI i�•I��'1�Jill �i .a , � � ! � I11�1,�i �Ii �!•i� � I PM'11�� I`II _- INA ?� t * Jill, I d.,K. y -'�•� !. ►S 1f � � j. � 1y* off i l 11 Ili "V _ — . � '1'�. I � .• .1! � `� I• • � '-•- •• 1 - 10 iiil tell 11 Ili A �wf,/l� ill �11p ii it I11 IIi '- f!.5 � •••� �' K. - - f lii it Ili lil � I � � Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update � f F •• f ff'w./i r. s I•p t ` t; r riy .r�•, •r s rs ;,�`.`�r .�. ,�� � �• � ' 'ter � y, -�i � , �; �• I `� .� � �F e F s..-. I. C r •,r lei-r Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update M San Bernardino County Taxable Value z Value Per Acre per Acre ($} (inland empire portion) San Bernardino County, CA _ <100,000 1.5 million 100,001-1,000,000 1,000,001-1,500,000 1,500,001-1,750,000 { i � 1,75Q001-2,100,000 Cd. T'Ij �.i Rancho aw ; 2,100,001-2,500,000 2,500,001-3,500,000 C u c a m o n g ' R„ 3,500,001-4,000,000 33 x 4,000,001-5,000,000 5,000,001-7,000,000 q 7,000,001-15,000,000 � ,'}i �7 edlands >15,000,001 T�Mi� ll Riverside a; k Corona �. r 1 Riverside County N (inland empire portion) Temecula 1.5 million CucamongaPM Rancho Plan Update r �r r Related and rLA— INS- Implementing �f RC Plans IF Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Implementing Plans r`err RANCHO N�rt�Q � AQNA { CUCAMONGACEIVERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WORK PLAN TOOLKIT ECQNQNIlC STRATEGIC LQCAL HAZARD DEVELQPNlENT DEVELQP�IA�EI+1T PLAN lVtiITIGATIQN PLAN CQDE UPDATE CLIMATE ACTIQN PLAN EVACUATIc]N CQ11+kN►�UNITYIIILDI:IRE ASSESSNtENT PRC3T£CTICtN PLAN Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Climate Action Plan General Plan envisions a world-class community, in part, as one that reduces its contributions to a changing climate • CAP's measures to reduce community's contributions to climate change are grounded in the General Plan's core community values of Health, Equity, and Stewardship. • CAP builds on the broad climate change policies set forth ' in the General Plan. • Also implements the General Plan by including the - elements of a "qualified" plan under State regulations Rancho Cucamonga • Unlocks project-level environmental review streamlining cLiMaTEacTPubliioc Para c Review Draft RANCHO benefits for development consistent with General Plan. CUCAMONGA 1d Se pte m be r 2021 CucamongaRancho Plan Update Climate Action Plan mWT OF • A POLICIES, • TO NAM ENFR �����1Cti�Y �I�pF R o � o z REDUCE �ff ADAPT TO z CLIMATE ` x CLIMATE POLLUTION 'U CHANGE ad OPEN SPACE IANDSLIUS Pancho Cucamonga General Plan Update IHow Plans for Resiliency Work Together Safety Element Each Plan Addresses : /Zf\� Different Hazards Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Different � Community Wildfire Protection Plan Focused Areas or Issues Climate Action Plan IHow Plans for Resiliency Work Together Integration of these Plans ensures projects and . - strategies meet the multiple City goals and objectives around resiliency. . . • • fostering a stronger and more prepared community. p Development Code U date FIGURE LC-3 LAND PLAN • Create consistency with new General Plan LJ • Incorporate form-based zoning elements for mixed-use urban corridors Alta Loma Etiwanda 1 Wilson Ave , Wilson Ave L-7 • Improve administration and permit a rocedures to increase certaint in p Y a w development review process for projects St consistent with the General Plan JJ ___ Pacific Electric Trail � / �' Baseline Rd -____- �_C _ ________, � Central North I I Fontana • Ensure compliance with new State laws edHill` Church St b = i --------------------- I ` U 0 Arrow Route Cucamonga I _______________� I ...,, _ I Central South. . o �e,^st & Southeast) v � � I I 4.,St L--- b�� ----- L— !i m ntarto m— Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update MovingToward Form - based Design Conventional Zoning: Form - Based Code: �Iq Use/Density Administration Administration Urban Form (Buildings and Public Spaces) Urban Form (Buildings and Public Spaces) CucamongaRancho Plan Update Process for Development Code Update • Currently working on the update and meeting with - stakeholders to collect feedback and input on the current code and identify opportunities for improvement • Public review draft Development Code January- February 2022 - • Final to Planning Commission in Spring 2022 • Final adoption at City Council in late Spring or earl p Y p g Y Summer - Pancho Cucamonga General Plan Update I!rL-AhN- Environmental **RC Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report EIR Primary purpose of an EIR is to identify potential significant environmental effects of the General Plan and identify possible ways to reduce or avoid them. Prepare Environmental Revisions to General Plan Analysis of (GP) & Tools & Tools ( EIR) Tools Consider, discuss, and Analyze policies and Revise GP and EIR (and address possible programs to ensure other tools) to ensure environmental GP effectively deals mitigation can be impacts along the way with environmental achieved implications CucamongaRancho Plan Update Topics Covered in the EIR _ • Aesthetics (Visual) Land Use & Planning • Agricultural & Forestry Resources Mineral Resources • Air Quality Noise Owk. , • Biological Resources Population & Housing g p g a • Cultural Resources • Public Services • Energy • Recreation • Geology & Soils • Transportation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Utilities & Service Systems �• • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Tribal Cultural Resources • Hydrology & Water Quality • Wildfire TRAFFIC S A N B E R N A R D I N O N A T I O N A L F R E S T ------------- �- -.------ry -----. - - - - - E I R ANALYSIS I I /o Day - ir Canyon SPHERE OF I FL Deer t E a East Canyon Growth will increase traffic I iast • Canyon Il Powei nontlst -' W ■ _ � The Plan emphasizes connectivity andmobility itle Rtl options _Y ----: - . ----- ---- Bson Ave a a� o� a, • Chaffey . m E y €���� �� College • ■ . m a =tee �_.,.. ---- ------ _�- ---- -. B Ya s�- • Land use is intensified near transit to provide Lemon Ave - , • ■ - : --� options --.: st encoura• Employment ed to reduce the need to g°..... ..��.......am.....:..+ .� ---Rd oP ■ '��°r� �� Visla PkwY commute outside of the city l I m�� - ;` �h�«�5 • Trails are not just for recreation, but an important Fe LLI ET e option for mobility `�� .a .• The r . Epicenter ys '.y ■ Jersey BINd ■ • Short term vehicle miles travelled (VMT) impact, Metrolink ■St," r-„---� °n 6th St CITY OF long term design solutions ■ � ■ - ■ FONTAN/ 4th=t ■ I San Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update AIR QUALITY & GREENHOUSE GAS/CLIMATE CHANGE EIR ANALYSIS • Global issue • State mandate • • ' City is doing its part with : • ' o • Design — Compact Urban Form • Mobility — Providing options for transit, walking • Climate Action Plan — Measurable objectives - On-Road Transportation 56% - Water 1% _ Building Energy39% - Agriculture<l% _ Solid Waste3% - Wastwater<l% - Off-Road Transportation 1% PPM Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update NOISE n 110 dBA•Rock Band;Freight/Commuter Rail Horn of 50' E I R A N A LYS I S 105 105 dBA•Baby Crying at 18" 100 101 dBA•Impact Pile Driver at 50' 9 Construction noise 95 90 90 dBA•Rail Transit Horn of Hoe Ram/Jackhammer of 50' People being people noise 87 dBA•High School Finals Game In Stands 0 85 85 dBA•Diesel Truck 150 mph)of 50'•Dozer of 50'•Drill Rig at 50' 80 80 dBA•Rail Transit At-Grade 50 mphl at 50'•Backhoe Loader at 50' 75 dBA•NoisyUrban Area Da time•LoadingDock Maximum at 50'•IdlingCityBus at 50' • Transportation noise 75 74 dBA•Kid's Sports Event at Field Boundary 70 72 dBA•HVAC Equipment at 3':Drive-Thru Speaker Box at 4' 65 65 dBA•Normal Speech of 3'•Rail Transit Station of 50' • Building noise 60 60 dBA•Heavy Traffic af300'•Camfireaf6' Future analysis for project-specific solutions 55 50 50 dBA•Quiet Urban Daytime 45 40 40 dBA•Quiet Urban Nighttime;Loading Dock Average of 50' 35 35 dBA•Quiet Suburban Nighttime 30 25 25 dBA•Quiet Rural Nighttime 20 • Cucamonga General Plan Update PUBLIC UTILITIES EIR ANALYSIS i U ire�t f a ' M Col Existing policies recognize drought conditions t • There will be sufficient water for existing residents and new growth • Impact fees and coordination with service providers ensure adequate services • Plan protects natural drainages and stormwater basins M1# i i i -Al Y j a Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Topics Covered in the EIR _ • Aesthetics (Visual) Land Use & Planning • Agricultural & Forestry Resources Mineral Resources • Air Quality Noise Owk.:, • Biological Resources Population & Housing g p g a • Cultural Resources • Public Services • Energy • Recreation • Geology & Soils • Transportation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Utilities & Service Systems �• • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Tribal Cultural Resources • Hydrology & Water Quality • Wildfire Underline Significant in Current and This General Plan EIR Newly Significant in this EIR EIR Public Review Period • EIR Public Review Period was September 10 - PLAN October 25, 2021VIRC • 5 comment letters received and 2 comments through EIR comment portal Il ^1 • All comments on the EIR will be logged and responses included in the Final EIR document City of Rancho Cucamonga GENERAL PLAN UPDATE & CLIMATE ACTION PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Report September 2021 State Clearinghouse No.2021050261 CucamongaRancho Plan Update r rr r�r r Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Revisions Made to September Public Review Draft General Plan ➢ Changed Rancho Cucamonga Station to Cucamonga Station ➢ Changed name of Focus Area 3 from Rancho Cucamonga Station Area to HART District (Cucamonga Station Area) ➢ Removed reference to Volume 4 being adopted separately for administrative amendments ➢ Revised Figure M-3 to correct roadway network at Young's Canyon Road ➢ Added Policy RC 7.14 in the Resource Conservation Element that reads: Energy Storage Facilities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the development of energy storage facilities on property owned or controlled by Southern California Edison and will cooperate with Southern California Edison on the development of such facilities in a manner that balances the interests of the community with the need for clean, reliable energy. ➢ Added Policy RC 7.14 in the Resource Conservation Element that reads: ➢ Revised Work Plan Tables (WP-1 through WP-5) to consistently refer to the overarching City Department, rather than smaller department or division, under the Work Group Lead column Revisions Made to September Public Review Draft General Plan ➢ Added Action Item to Work Plan : General Plan Maintenance. To ensure that the General Plan remains current the City will conduct regular reviews of the Plan and the standard conditions of approval. • Review and update, as appropriate, the Standard Conditions of Approval • Provide an annual report of the implementation of the General Plan ➢ Updated Placemaking Toolkit with How to Use This Toolkit section and updated Frontages section for clarity and consistency with the development of the Form Based Code for Mixed Use Zones ➢ Added Chapter 3, Environmental Justice Strategy, to Volume 4 Recommended I!rLAINN- Revisions to too RC Consider Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Recommended Revisions for Consideration • Policy edit and additional Work Plan action item to address fiscal performance of development projects Revise Policy LC-3.2 as follows: ➢ Community Benefit. Require a community benefit and economic analysis for large projects that abut existing neighborhoods or for any project at the maximum density, with a focus on resolving physical, economic, long-term fiscal, and aesthetic impacts. Add action item to Volume 4, Table WP-3: ➢ Fiscal Impact Analyses. Establish additional procedures and tools to consider the financial benefits and impacts of development at the project approval level based on anticipated full life-cycle costs and value per acre. CucamongaRancho Plan Update Recommended Revisions for Consideration • General Plan Designation change to allow for open space/public facilities ➢ Change APN : 106117219 from Rural Open Space to General Open Space and Facilities Designation Current: Rural Open Space Proposed: General Open Space and Facilities -------------- ---- -------- - --- - --- - --- - -- a 0I a 0I U n c c m m Almond St Almond St I FT-M I I I ITT� I [-TTT] I I I I I � I Rancho CucamongaPlan Update Recommended Revisions for Consideration • Policy edit to address Haven Avenue and 4th Street gateway location Revise Policy LC-7.1 as follows: ➢ Gateway & Employment Hub. Establish the Central South Community Planning Area4s estabimshed as the City's main "gateway from the 1-10 Freeway" and an employment hub of regional significance. Haven Avenue and 4th Street, in particular, is a significant gateway location that is envisioned as a higher intensity urban environment with iconic architecture and a mix of uses that can include luxury or full service hotel, high rise office building, fine dining restaurant, and/or a public recreation amenity in addition to higher density residential uses. CucamongaRancho Plan Update Recommended Revisions for Consideration • Additional policy to address utility preservation : ➢ RC-7.14 Utility Preservation. Public and private development within the City, including multi-purpose trails, shall not interfere with safe and reliable transmission, storage, and generation of electricity. With the exception of utility infrastructure and other public improvements that do not interfere with such infrastructure, permanent structures are not allowed within utility corridors. • Additional Standard Conditions of Approval for projects related to open space and recreational uses within utility corridors CucamongaRancho Update Next steps - RC *oo Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Next Steps • General Plan, Climate Action Plan and Final y� EIR to City Council for consideration December 15, 2021 • Continue to work on the Development Code - = Update, a key implementing tool of } s n the updated General Plan •: . .. x - • Public review draft Development Codev� x. January-February 2022 • Public hearings on Development Code 1 Spring-Summer 2022 � , GeneralPancho Cucamonga Plan Update Recommend ations • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending the City Council: Certify the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan Adopt the General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan Gene ra I PI a n@C ifyof RC. u s AA- hN- Q Panning Departrnent 909-477-2750 C � www.CityOfRC .us/GeneralPlan Twitter: @CityofRC Instagram : @CityofRanchoCucamonga