Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-04-13 - Supplementals
Wood Partners D RC2020-00440 April 13 , 2022 rF (.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Project Description Who: Wood Partners What: A request to construct a mixed-use development comprising of 259 residential units, 2 commercial units totaling 2,253 square-feet, and 1 live/work unit with 816 square feet of non-residential space. Where: Southeast corner of Foothill Blvd and Etiwanda Ave Entitlements: Design Review DRC2020-00440 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r (-� Surrounding Zoning , General Plan , and Land Uses Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District 1 North Vacant City Corridor High Mixed-Use Urban Corridor(MU-UCR) District 1 South Single-Family Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Residences East Single-Family Low Residential Low(L) Residential District Residences West Shopping Center General Commercial Regional Related Commercial (RRC) District 1 1 —Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, Subarea 4 riCC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Location fir• y' • i ♦. I r.•. I T 4 - air t( ,Th�Mad I ;., [. >' ... a l 7 _ :mac`. • heny&C�'-.n I,r-�4 wn sQ "�ijYoSf7 S 'f Ire '"� ��yy���� ' F '. '�. .ramp s �� � 4 -'x'"!`'�� �,' { •=•• ervcr ''v q e • T.r 1 P. =O. a s - L:.�:J1 o e • -.4 - _ _ _ �.r •.._. ' .... 0 — _ ... Qgi@I�: ��� � MR Blvd'. .l WHistori¢.;le 66: Foothill Blvd BVvd - --G1 ° ° tI C Cri? BFvd 0 1 {L' BM.unn-Edwards Palnts N ; .F r Pant stow 4 .14t. it .r• . PROJECT SITE i ... IVP 1 w e t yy e .: a. .4041440, .... if IP +.01. .. i .r...**/..' e' -.-' 4. .1: gr — E ' ' . ate,ier ,- I.Sally Beaury g -- - -IO F H. r'.. .- • ,� rr sir aeash'ssvPh , r . . S - - } i ; _ r a DMV Now Kiosk • j� alveiion Army + r n"�L•7 �i ♦ 1 ly Thrift Store + � � Che.,uit Ave Chcsmut Ave Chestnut Ave CheslnA Ave Cf.,, utgv i` a 1 R F� • _, r„ -01,11111 lif-.7 1612,„ et. off/ R _ ., 'le". .... . "fir .r- - igr...6... . or_._Ar . ... r i" ff r. . ra - �� _ to - ..a+ .1 -_f JI J T -elf ,-A_ ln&low Dr r ir r . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VI r „,,,\.\\:\:::.\\\„ \ •\` . \ 1 N\-\\:‘‘ \ \\ '.. \ ir 11.=11111.111.-- • • - fit-4--fi, ---- �, _ --_— - is }`i9'S -�..q✓x” �' " t v { C '.t�,ry tA: c.�a S - �•t tt i t • ' _ r +• try x t - , c • 1a "''r 'a c dir a'�eh '� , i •r S' r .fd ltiir 5`+ � Looking southeast from the intersection of Foothill and Etiwanda c� �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V \. { '". - �� V Looking south from Foothill Boulevard � �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / y _ J •. Looking east from Etiwanda Avenue (- rj1=111111imCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :.:1!_ll Blvd �' — ->• SIDE VARO __.....____._._.j 41 5' _ -- —. — _ - �_.�- -•- .- -- • , �A �f - ... .. fir , _ �, vA,-: ..p. � rx §Y dA y�. h{i J 1.1 •. '- Br _ �� m Sat A3 Malt Ala Ala 61811 A3 +_� .... : jyJfT� - ...„ Lvl1 =� - uflfev I 4.7'I N/`+, Bl-A Ala Ala 1•ett I Aa 1 Aa� }q,}q{�,, '��,. �,�''I -AM, Exsmanl / or, ..::. gm; mg 21 � _ � ; l'�,a`''`'? , ,' BUILDING 2 MI. �... a. [65 Rhos BUILDING 1 -1. _ rnaruElec , �Ir it • Al LVI h,161 .I•AI' ''' ? . _;I1�� I L J qg k4i Aoyl 4 = _mliliFfi A.. I.•.9' _ • p,2 11 •E1 - ga mr. a,w �1 _ I, A ` .,� ......, IL - J ' _ : 77111 !Pr - l—fill dll. Courtyard PIP 'ia. 71 I CD r1. �y., Ala-all }� 1 I As Gp A3 W� + x.1' L :. IF 1'�� _•'}' -1 I Al r,,: ' W11.�EW111 i.. ! ..e A3 5a . r .*E t`,• A5 .�. _: turf B1 Kim -1. r- 1 L AS • TS` • ''! . e Aa�ll I�:�—. Courtyard -� &.. RI {� '1 ASJ: _ A3 n, l `�• • B1•ek 51 +,,4F[nan Arnvell' -_ e.� p • tl t 1 ' - ,,, jz_ 11 1 Hatch incicales area lncd�ded in camnxln - 1 illo �` r �. � �I ._,_ anon sp ace,minimum6'x 16'dmancian r—I Building 2 f I A 42'HOWall 10 . , - / / erg �� c - Blinding 1 ? 1200 Surface Parkin 161 g 3aragc Wall Line BBIDN - _K '4 127 Tandem Stalls] -- - QI } tit , +I Min d La 'etc!,na 692' t v$ eu11 r - add r. = ,9 on CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Foothill Blvd -a- - —IP. --b. -----------------------\ --p. 5. r.7 .....-.- 41011 ---AF—C;lavv-__. _*v... _ — --1.- -*- — — _____.7...._. .._=.._ ._ . . .._- Vz.% — -t. .--.-- --- .V4,- --- .1.4=, — V.m. _i'6_1‘,,... .;Pe. --,,„, . _,„ -_ ,. .A,-1;., z.- .i__._-:,-r-ipet: - -,. . - -4-, - tge -7,-qp.W ,P2r17_ ', i ,. aultr-0. SIDE YARO -5ffr-iisc. . -,2-.- A 4 „4. 41 41 1 1 ),1!, i ,,, . i.,47,±T '''' ,- --,,,V4—, , , ii. ,...4: ,,,, :.?:;,:.,:: 1 .'..- - - :" J. Ullrea-...- ,.. aat I A3 Malt:--XI:,-14.-i''"' 11811 , A3 , 1:•2 1-A.,t,11:vizi mg_ .._.= eassmani .1 ;'.. i . E 1, '".::: : Ili or . . _.. _ . ' '7' rel.''ir --- 1. - -- cil.- ilEi.dtv,- 1- 7 : ' ' . j LL'i-'.'4°'''' .,__7.-—7:_d..!ztl-fIl 17111Ii 1 / TI2ShfEICC • MI . .' =MO A' liNsii ....„. . ! AI M.. ''`'''. ',,,,. , tiNEgam A.1©1,/1 ......_,. , ra SU - : ..-----1 127 0 • . , - • I — NI - A.,, El . . a,• . „„„, 7 ......- 041 ' •'-"L.III Tt..-p4 1 .- . . , ,,.. 2.00. 1 ix-r 7...-..,„ k., A.3.g E imol — hirl.il -,-; = TLIT-1 4... BUILDING 1 ,,. - - , BUILDING 2 . 4 711 A3 . IV i I lafi IA . imk -- Al1 12:1121 ....... L_ ,..r 4.•CD 13 i . MEW ' ____m • dii iltr A3 ,,,.MI= A3 . Ala-all in Orli ... B1 PIP I I CO Ll rtyard 1—1-7 Re /10 .3.._11 7- ,R I i .., a 11 MN 3 ..v.. — '1 i '.-- '1.B1I•,,-a.. . i• . -1- I._-117_4-.11', p-n.-...,, -=:7:P4.i--1' .r- -92 - •.' ., _ T a 1 _ _ 2 oa ,t • , I I ....4 - . . . t t 1 , I Ilirl, i-r --- -H, ,. 1 , 1-,; -;,:.:',,-, - I _, _Hatch Inc!Gales aiea included in cerninac 1 Pi r' i I — r '• - ' i.E -1 aain space,rninimm 6'x 16'dnnension 42'High Wall '-1 Building 2 , 1 '''\ ' III .1111 10 I T C v.-!, I / / 0 2 ,ti ,• R - I 1 1 I.i b M . - Building 1 I ;i. -,-20o Surface Narking Gara .Wall LAM Beton .ki _EIPMPI ..K. . - 1 ip mi 2-Story ' _27 Tandem Stal ID) _ . -' ;-- 1111PE.ffruev. Affill . . . 11_ . 1 . = t-, , • -,-, t Berrer •cicr.rx1 .1V II - 1692' ,..,3 o n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (---c (--( air -40,(---ric IOOtlfll filvc Pocket Park _ - '. . ■ .,�,. I c.+,a : • -rG 1 A3 L� 41 u k 1- li A" - Aft It I.Y.,.i _ r .i i ,' Ma , -- . i ■..a» II ■ !' E 1� r f A. ..' Maim MI• 1- Lott, Lea ! L:16,-.I7h■r,.im •'I LOGGi 0 L•. 1 } rhi 0ii + n i � -- w • ' . �= Li Live/Work , Al i,_." A2 ,•••. 0 r iv,„,,,, , Commercial 1 �h Lela MC... :rr. .m. war « �� - . I- 2' ■ ' r' II=1. RI ■ Al • aai - Al r-r(�r . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BLVD a a i '/ r rrr err err r1e Column err Errerr errrrr errerr . rrrerr a FIE r r r r r r i II IL e o l ' e v i i ear FIE i CEx:r r r T. or 1 . k I / • • 1 II l 1 • .._. . • 7 Ai_ JAi nro . ' I t mff t Y ZX a t326 Garage Parking ya Q , - Y [1oo Tandem Stalls) 1 '�E , � � I 5 1 o e r la I r f , , r , _ l ] i 1 rl ;Er.Er.Er,Errr.E l I l a l ACCESS RAMPlir b j ---------------------------- e on CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conceptual Landscape Plan FOOTHILLS..CII£ITNICE UNE 2 o ir) \MO EASIEISISYT L, 0 0 0 G 15511.1 0 0 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 1 i pa n . " ----- _../JW1 --'-'--..-- •''-iitaL 4 r 'rue Air A!"..e..Airerrtpr 1.1.,..:_.:_fl ...2...,..r...r.....?iks..7..;_+•_..7.,:,;,a6.Z...M..04...c.i_13•,._-..,_..- - ....e.,.."er4P,MI.STIIRIBSSOMMF ''.--, ....4E%._: _.7.7.-7;e:,---....-.,.._-.7.1.777.•:-... .-,„:• .21,..,.2id&=-.1..----..s.0 rai in g us 1"---•'''"q 71.1-:, ''' f''''-'-'.' -.-- ''.4" . *,WI'X 411111111111W-Igitr''' '4mwAllg"erimgraMMaitlaletrdniidffiiiiiiiii.,,,Ki;RAMWAH.:=05EM.1. 1 -41111." la: z •• - 7. '-''.Tkvi Tir • 40,.*::0,..e..:. ,„-,,-•,-„,..:,0,,,r,---.4:7.,-- .•'rt.-v.' • ••••:''''' ..•''''oralrffdrif -Z2?-*----"'-----'.--,:s./. .,v///:/-;i7 :41%,;-/--g-..-..////2%. •• •••://,-/-_-v////;44-1',•-• -•---•---, - 'r- 411 0 .....",-,-,ee,A....Ai°--..;,,,.,.°1:62e,,-,.'! .1m:11,..,•01.,..1,...sf ,-,11,. :t,.::-ie,,,.-•-.tg..4.p,,,,,,,agwtgatzao.,.-..., -.:, -,4*,.-. . ..:, .. ....:. ••/..........--,_,_L•/:.,......... .-, . . .ifir, 7.• .-. •4,.. ',.:• t.-..7.E'21.'-'M=AMWMAS''.'. 4.'-.K e A4',A1r frIilgter''E.:.:..-•7•:Ii1.611111 i-:l '5t.'1 ;g;11ip1.i.. 1Imj.' l-L4il I›iriji4li rii:4 Se:.L44.7E;,:.l 0 TOi1ng 1:• .11..rM7::7-,2%"1.,7'ia..4,.,'••4/1V11.:e.....-•-:d-e! EPHR,VAANRCYE .'-::.:Sq.S•.in.n..,•W.... ..' its,. II „rAl POIH7 :... . .231i iLID4 • . ' r i.,. Re,1..A ° 77-4:117.11 7:111,t ,. WA'. 4J17:47;ri K,,,, i.111712 ,,,,i. LIgi,ITL ,.,24.4.0 i I i".1- '11'111.1441 ' 1441 ii L.,omiL.,iste,. AFIRIk.. ,4 •-;;• ,g...A111i, 41'ii,--11 .4......:1r . , .. IV• ,..n i 1 E 1 nu •..'Mli11,-.1 -..-=■,- -..• .01L-41 .111-d1"" Le.. Jr.? ILA .111.1 el..v Mlilo!ga. auto 1 . Elio ,111 51 rp--grv:7-gr,"!•%,z,*-71'14-111iiiiT- 1.11 -- ME E---• 11143D I -1 ' ,- -• -N.'tr. ••••-•• N IIWLI ,SPOIM-2 . ,:: 0..2ii r rii in! - - ..• i 4.1==:;iil r ort iv-01.1 I.' .L. ,-,.. -.7„-ffir.'.77111::::::::::::::::...01 ., 11" . . ATI, I., - ...... ... • 0 1 i • RiNkir41 Ire& All ' ' - -': -ipp,roi 1: ' ,diEl fp -cur- -.__ I 1 I aim •-._.... k. ir, „... ... Erri I - I'll-ZIM 9 li'll1111171411141111 4:...i: 7 I "III Ell MI I ' .11 111E1110,-, ..i v,e•''' ,t. ,.;., ......6,4. 1 .ir MI.V&1 IrOitiME!.:..2 - .4."11k0 • ...‘"•.•....is... 0.ii•4 111.04111!•ii•-r' . .,,..i.11 I: 1r37.11, .=-,.. _• . .,;'-` -.• _AILVD,12.:x_....x. i?!". La r 1 1 F. .7„,,,-_. .- . -.1 glifto,__--.1 I •- ''"''.I' 4 1 . Athimi; ,ox.,4 t _MI:_..,...... • . ..antmal iiiims. d ,t.. ..,-,:l 'rim •:1 ,•Iriviraft !,,..,.!...• & • ei;_, • _ 1 . .g1 gt •= ;,,,. - , .- -wr.7..:a.:,,...4,a-.. v_aci ,,, ,... ._ .,. ,....i .-.,, 4.4_-,,, ''3- .'7.'li: '.,t i.t111101.,M, .. '• ,,E. < 1 i ... 1 '' P ' 1'' --J• €'7•••'24-- • -• ''' •ilim.. 1 lliAM -i'-',11 • •smial mew,47rii....-____ _, ,... • . . .. :m.F1 .4-iir.. i 1 'II N. -1 '.',2 'fi'llei• -1 .1'! 1 1"- -'1'" 1 11.1'.w11 '1-1= -7'1 • 11§:17.17-17 T'• '1'1''1a1m4-1:::::::::1...i-,1•.'d __ • .,,' Ir." Er' 116.11P*11 ..7.=%. .14.,AV .. Ir. 1=g,.4.01 .1 -'-' '11 ' Is•im 0,44.5%., `.40 . -• n '-$:q•leilv'- •= . c' -,•-:Jr..- ,_..An ,IMEI N. min.c =;me: ,i,‘,.. _. .,Mr.45,1 Bag RA,;..1 gi.;,4 . .-r.m,-;• -, , -0.s .m. ...., .....W_Lt.':. RIM' 1"II. • Ill'Eik. -...r'"":, II7 iiIIIMIAli ----'-1..M.-w•I" i, .46, ..::-R•46'. ill 'il .111,..,,, I W• 1 ... i...-• 1.1. L-03,, _ g•mg.. mil.. pr-,,,thr..9 . ,÷,_ - r, .. M....^.110., I - .,..,.. .....Ift..C.. •• =1' Jail 11WIE IBC' gr'011. 1.1.4irwal • AIIIM-7.: ..... •_,,..••-,•-•• 117 •-•:- imeie -Iik-ir• -ii.i; Mgr ,4- ••....:.•• ii,-1 - • - AN- m._ . AAA; - mgi -0;,- -,, ;;4(D,..,c ( =..-- ' rin.:1 ......1:0.1.0T,"IF. ' 7ii..!. •-•'-•-I. =".: .'.-41 --ke. - . NE rim cii .i crii .iimii mrai 6.1.111 Illem, ,e. ,..4..!1,10,... 6,...36. i!ii:.-,.,..At* _,. ow..,0 .m..... ii,. 14Lri.. to,.La 0. 0 .,....w Ipqr,. Hour ••••=nr,-1 -,iim-. ...a - ...04,...,;., . low, lik,, 1:0 di i is .... .. , _ . . . • O .1=IWO: 1411 ig- • ..r., Am.,,,a,, im -- , ..---.E • 1, , __- •-•, ,.. ..,..,7,:, , ,,-- •., . ...-_,, .,,----- - rim', _____._mi -•...._.: • h• - --• 131,_ m.r_PPwr •,t,•• . . _... 0 •IL IME„. Ilreill% i mmmmmmm eimonsinkl 1.1a. j!m,.,:::. ,..... IA 1 _...,:...=-4,-_ .., ,-,. ,:....... „ ------,-,.ir•-...--- il gm , • 17a-• -- n: Alurnriglirrto-Nir, •1 "111 mm v. ..willgar-MEM_EL--..ilitiNNE ....,ielinaar,Vit.i.... _■4111.71 0. 0 .,. i.-4t my Wiltitt •L 1 milgtir, .1...... ININk*il WM, 15 0 ,. 'Whig 1:::.±,d1r:.- -1! -''l CIIETTZZIr tok, ..Ni Gr,••• WI -'. .'.. ... . ... .= .14-%...m 11 = go ISILLAPI13 '''''' t igl 111. ..f AR• e NiaaliiiiiiMEMILIONIMIlliiiiimclulliriltilliffilli 11 - r - • -4 M--1- .41 " p lit , 041 liiiilinicy it6og I. .., _ Wit' .. - • ill t 11) t 1 folit i LIM ° 6.,fArillal- 0 -------0 ...pp...vv....A...Np,... , , • 1 i6,...,., ilD INV 4....!.t2'''''.-':•:::: % a g. . - I ..17.4 cf‘. • .. ,. ;tr., • •11 „ !- 7.1j ,. . 0 ' . . . liir• ., Nat ---' . '''- ''.'',.- '.'' ' me:7.-- - ...-,-7/-7- --,-59.7=.4,-7' -7..:=..;,-,..-e.-- "•. ......,-,- ..7.'•• •,,. -7...,.0.•/...-7 ... .,,,:.v.r .. ."•%,Al•-•' -.. ' •..E.I. ' • ./ ..' •:.1:•••::?-.:30.: ••:;;..../:', :,•:•,..•. .=:••:,,TAX ::•:,;r" ':%:Nr; . .... . .,:...,'t- •• - .. •-'di - . : . _ _ • . • -- • •..L. i _, • . W BO : . !MIAMI ...L ' .18111•3 IMO-130MA C' .111 BLECK WILLI_ PM,...EA.GATE. 0 ...EASEMENT SEE ELEVATION T SHEET, Q Q DECORATIVE MC PIERBJETER MILL SEE PEP.I.SHEET LS . 1E N itUi , A 411 c_,C(r_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ail r r(c (-pc VI r Recreational Amenities ( Indoor) 1 \ , ,... __,... I \ --lia- Foothill Blvd — —. -- Jr .... .. ... _ .... —N.- ....-:. SIDE YARD (� i--- _ Business and '1 41 t f x p ]Y t r A a �i� Conference Center GS . '' n, DI • Lii I �, � , s I�;,y ab� Aa el H- 1,'�� c2 B1,19 Al ar- Ala 1-al[ .3 ',�I� —�/ E "� '!11 �. p my ��7 A3.An A3 rill 11 ; ���� tl i i+ .I : tltl { ' _ t ', . ;. 7Z DE. I Vb. ' & •1. I-.. :_• .1Itl .:, a r.2,1— plea AN- L ®L."� . L It ' ~n r n W... � „ �cct"v�c°` _tlF" - V le Ei Lovl O e ram,. �Ty '\ — I1 s,... €I,� m :I_ .E.L �rjr�' ''r� I.�.q2 .c .I _R� �` - A Al Yi1 �L.Al .. L 'A3 A9"^ A� A3 � A [n, aLu 4 1 1@. C Al Lvl 1 i� R 7 1P+ . / litm_ . S , na Iotm�I 1- ....! h.. ,�� Courtyard tl _E 4 f A -- As S $ L_ I naGE: lid Ah2..x Ala-all IA 13 Ma I .. • =R�1 P3 Jr 4I 7. Dill — ? , A5 1 r _ c.t-- Al _� ; gin r B1 Courtyard el � � O Al � �^ w � _ A3 +I I:- aic 41 11 ■— u 1 ... i A3 _� n1 - Ct - tlB1 g �" l % PA lir• 61.an �i'�'i • • B1 Zraah(�LYI mil(,I' - - rVy •-�. _.. _ ..7 .M Sr , [A1a� l- 4. I Y-- --- - �� It LY•. 14 l �I _I ■ I ,I,Cn_ �~ ar. L .. Hlhudd — U4i — a � es.: �, ram .,,,. `�" — • ' ��-- b B-S `. - as Incincicares aryl a in mammon ■ a { , 12 Imdn6 a 15 dmenelan Building 2 i'- {ii ��..1 a apon%KIM,min w . r. #' r g 6 t: '''- ,[ ,.1..‘ r,1 1 1 „,ht'.:!' rill_1_I erg l � Buildir Gym/Club Room 200Surface arkin �' 9 _Garage War Lino F30IDH 0'• rwI27 Tandem"tal la] --- 'a� -II ED .77 1 }Ain 10'Landxape WI ±692 I Buffer YJ:tI W �r �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recreational Amenities ( Indoor) 1 C2 gs1a, Ala l Ala' ,1 alq A�IIt A3- It _ • • —f •x•rrn fLrn � Alta Cuvee =,,, i�.- 11 =; . Indoor Amenity Exhibit ' . .' 1 • f 1 P Lobby/Leasing:1,600 SF 1 �.,._ �., ioees'3Lr+i c.w- ..obey .01 3i 4r -1- r-3. .��,—..-1 © j' .. 5 Fitness:1,200 SF - a , A3 Al Al © Club Room:1,3505F �I Al EI -I A, A2 4• . 00 Business Center/Conference:1,500 SF :. • • H 9 - {r-'' • A2 81 Be w'°" y = - I, _ Ail' 81 e• I. 1 ::II Mi __. Total Indoor—S,650 SF Asa {- i i,� e A3 -',' Courtyard A3 = l' I - M ` A3 . 7 L • Al ' . - 1125'x 60' 1 S -. Courtyard l� VDA3—_J !.. . 100'x 104' i, 61 rail —Al ..� a + r 4' 1 N. : '• u,euxre 3 . illlit _ . C1 . : " 1 Giri 1 1•'`�, _ } 131all W{ 1 it ° -B1 •TrashIElec t' _ill En .- i✓?' � .I j �Al ' alit 1 i (A11 Ls .4 - - ; el '.'' —1 -0 i ,.._ it,q n F-- � 1 Hatch Indicates ansa included in common } {2-SYo04 �ry4 - � My- �,*� open apace.minimum B'x 18 dimension - ......,g. `. 1 �• • F �' E111r= 42'High Wall *-EU Star C I I \ ' , 12,.. _T _ . e_1,—_, . , _ :::, _ _ tT 0 O Immiliww----- -- - 5 �� 1 1 /, • i hill , Iil+ie in ` - ir - . 1 • (�oII+I�f1:ilti 1 Irir-- 1 I I!] ri Ill 11 11611110 L. • I ' I -"` 111 it , I '_L • + _ ,q l''. -.1 ra — li. ram ; .J�• .n�1� -�.� a r',u,�_ ►A - mu - • 'j,{ _ __ �-,�I, .+ IWII II rr , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rrr Recreational Amenities (Outdoor) 1 \ , 1 . ,... __,... I \__ Foothill Blvd —ab- . . -- _ —N. - -M.- — —- — 4100-0. — - SIDE YARD_ +IP- — __.....___...____....__...1 57.-a—7 -____....,.______=______, ---• - .1 - lIk.•,- .1 •.r. 5 1, . ' II 1 4 : 41 41 t t r. / . ,;-' •-:...,. " -t r, ,...:r .... OE11.11A1 I ;" E256,X,1 131-1 Al drbal; _ All Al li ....,.....; H • - !I . , s 7 IS • 1'_capiii I '. ., • .111111 i'l._ U a.. • / li • 'WL • L,_, ,r ,,L.M.by ,j', - ' = — . lif"- 1 i• - / (BF , '4, 1d - — . 02: L dilliii • --, z t iiilli:1 9'A2 t rA-- .,,, A,IAJ-• a,,AI _JO ,,AIrl Mop c 1QLvil , ,--- Ei . i Min4 1_ 5. • i AS ' AI — [ , . . --. • / 111111r4 Pi I a. • - • -- P.-, i OE , (' r+ — rT -,' ' A 3 771 1.''.A- -I A3 .- A.IA ,. MN , Al ' - . '-: Cni -,,..c ' _. , , - < / , -- 1,, i . .._. - _. A3 rikil Al IL 1 43 i 111.11AP ' MUM A3 ,I;k, g .. 1 -• 11611 ill 5 A1 • •••' __i _ r • . — c fin pp . 1 B1 ' MN. I -r.,_&••I _A3 .,• r -'1 - ' ,i,. .. • Al Pi-al .-- Courtyard mil . VOI 3 in A. .._ra...... '..-. ' :r-°'. in -- - - 41 11 V, - . .P.3 ' .• ' p..= i13. 41,_ Gi R2 rual ..., -. - B1 1 i''• 11 4 . I • . . 131•aft . r -4 — ' - ••. \ \ J .7 . 4 `(A.,_F ArnlVf I .., 111M101 . # ME illr„..: _ ._ 1:=_._ _II t.t 111Pals b Ev L.•1' I . •• 1 -1 . ....,-• , c''': ri : 2-Lc":i Piga - Helen!swabs,area included iri osmmon WW1 apaCa.minimum 6'3 15'dimension ', I Building 2 1 1 I Y- / i 6/ MMM -. NE ‘ N 6 I I I 11 1111111 . 2 ';..NI 42*HO Wall C " 1 ..- ;''-'L MEMEN1MMENNIr . ,; I _ 40i., Courtyard A ; .., ,, Courtyard B . , k Paseo Garage WM'LIM Eisiox A. I lo _ , S - I I ..:...: - !!'" I .. s- • s•CO 'Z'ELic, r 1 rr, o r r(c- 111-- 3L 7,1 7 iOILIn nl VY•11 ''' i: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Co u rtya rd A BUILDING 1 COURTI'ARD AME VITY EXHIBIT f 0 LEGEND :: �� �.��f�e - _�::I �,, ® + : ���" Va.-- I a 9a �� k � �R �� � . . . ... 1 ME l ll li iili PpDLANASPAT:RRACE 3SUSF r.,'_.- 11.�. e a II Ilk ..� _. tdis= • • 0 CHAISE LOUNGE SEATING ' • - - .. wziu • __. I 1 BUILT•IN COOK CENTER AND E NINGSEATING _arj44i 'il -,.�P! FIREPir WITH LOUIIGE SEATING cI.I06sFl i� Ali ..- .60e a 1 0 LOUNGE SEATING AREA xi l-f �� r��� .40 CI... RI y r.411h, ACKEDBUILTINEATINGWITSTABLESANDSIDECHAIRSaup.imin �Q R . II! TOTAL BUILDING 1'COURTYARD AREA=11.025 SF IiL__sr, I JI III I �:, lit, • r�1 larlI IL.f I��II� 7� I-��; .1h IL_ .M:;: ,111 -C' a ■,■■44 i-� � '. _ fODI ENCLOSURE F&+CraG Y.l j �t��� .A ff`aa77 I = 1 k - -_ u--..;-1__ n R mitre 7 =1111._=�+ FWil. iSS OLIVGIRW...VG { VYr 1 il7 31m. of- �. �a � �rrrir 1 3 . s • li■��dwrir0114. �,�a -- a !F 4111. ::; "'--.: MImo I� - �� I 4 _ •I - • ` COOK OMER LOUNGE SWING WITH IRE PR r a111. p (i J - :19:1 i ill it ail \liii-11-,471 _ . - m - co . ,.•,..-_.•ti El ffl jiAr liki. , '!14.;,k ,,, on l_ if.... .. : J • s= .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Courtyard B rI BUILDING 2 AMENITY EXHIBIT 0' 1 a ` in �. xlw E ,, 1112iI Ri1N ' t ii 1., i., I. Ro�H E,•.,p� 1 LEGEND + 4p4pt 6 b _ i aI6'86'OPEN PLAY LAWN f 316 SF . I ■. ' ."r - - FIREPLACE LOUNGE(F10 SF) 1M-1 . -.. - �=I• - ....-�� [�.:. "•[ 1 OUTDOOR COO CENTER,WRING.AND ----' ,� ,-4 T I--- 15 ••=d�, l LOUNGE WARP.*AREA - ••:.I:••-. ,._• . •;•'1�19�@ QBUILT-INDAYBEDSEAflNG ""!N 1 ■ t ---______-_-_ L 16'a17'CiIARER'S TOT LOT{.72 SE} 1 r �- _ /�., �51{ [ ]AMENITY SPACE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA moo SF} -J — — - ,]-' - - TOTAL BOLDING 2 COURTYARD AREA=7.925SF I ' �• • .i ��• s'� R .' i! 31 - �� =ate: _���. !' I ii. T ' I- . .fiskifiiief - . ...,1' .ice■®�,. 7 - - r. �t i • "4 -►. - ^_JI•;, • Ef{pi - tb�rk4�1` oAY t T . l6 • � tiyy,,pp ,i-ma _ ' 13 li 1 111# r5 I r OUTDOOR RRE LACE COO(CENTER.C4NNG.AP<11O11NGE SEA',NG &11LT-i1AYBFD TO1 LOT PLAY EQUIPMENT MILIEU!'PLAY SURFACING OM PLAY LAWN �i[r r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Courtyard B — Open Play Lawn Alta Cuvee — Play Area &Tot Lot Detail _, ;•y.° „ , ..—,r:., ,��V_ � � II * zti © 1,376 sf turf lawn •.;' '- . 47 0 272 sf soft floor play area •`U, ` _ iI _ -• This area will have movable playground equipment, _ t I I l '' ••• • III: -' 11 .. '► movable toys and movable sports equipment that will •• . � accommodate younger and older kids while . 2' s 16' maintaining flexibility with the space to be used for * : - 0 _ more adult activities. - • . .w • We are also proposing to have a"kids day'once a - ,- .• , - • .-• month that is managed by the property where we will - 1 MIEWErent a bouncy house for the day for children to use. _ y��MI�!■■■■■ �,� I� -���� 0_L tAPi1r�� amiftr: 7imm . r ' r- _ , ,f "'� r It Jp r' WillyGoat • t.. ' ir ►" i ) r ~- Ill • NC .i......:.: 'yam. • E• •'• "4 �-—2 n 110410, ' .:[-el ,, . . 1 4kT -� 4 lit ... r- ( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ' Paseo . . . . . . , -.irk „„ 7 ' .'• PASEO AMENITY EKHIRIT A ^w_• ' L� LEGEND ■■■kas! gl r J i'. • IPA:.. ML r • +9- ■-s /1R I■4..F.. J I. a'n ■e■L.l�1aJ■N■■# IIi Y , .. ... PASEO PLAZA.BANC-ED CONCRETE PAVING.RAISED PLANTER ?I�• I ty■F 0 i T { - •✓ -U WITH BUILT.IN SEATING AND SIECHAEN TREE.TABLE AND CHAIR L r _ Po. 5. '11.••E , SEATING WITH Ti'/OLIJJGHTS AND POTTED PLANTS-11,900.59 0 N11111111E74 • - [ !LOUNGE SEATING ARFA 099:FI I • _ - `` VV BA+ III • R14SW PLANTER WRX EL. '..:.-•VG • ■ 7 6.i X35'DCCOMPOSCD GRAMM BOCCL BALL COURT WTI A' ;ci ��q CONCRETE HEADER(390 SF) .._ _,_ J 0 ENHAh ED CONCRETE PAVING WITH TABLE AND CHAIR SEATING I III SWEET'• , - f:RIllllilil OFRUITLESSOINE MEEALLE WISH UFUGHTS S : •�L\ i _I ;I -##J,'��i�,�,+„�.� ' * • I ;; 0 1u:r� - 111 I �sK r CD Tp'x 28.005 RUN i �1 -.41 7 = IL ����� © �I L - TOTAL PASEO AREA=l,2455F 1 �� ,iI1 •• r. �� �. r.'- ° 0 M ili 7 ! V ^ F ti, `::' 1—Fr 1 Il y ,T -ia - CI ! r - i-Il 7] ti it _,Al _ J TJ ` a •- 0 _ JI • fr F A..1, IL:. • BOCCE CALL[O'JRI PASEO LOUNGE SWING. I 1LIC®'r. � I F� ,- 1A illili MugAl — lUUMME•WR' 1 .1_14A it IE1'. .7";_'4. m mom I .. _d<� II 1 .Ir 4m In IW ,M DOG RAI STUCCO SEAT WALL PLANTER .111 r �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fencing and Access 1 \ r l ,... __,... _ _\ t• Foothill Blvd -- \-- —514 ...-.. ........_. �t _ ....-:. --or--ora1i YARD _ li'tP ' r•,. IAla E.p �`5A3.y� -- un5a A3 91a1t Ala Rra �61s11� �A3; �+iv_ 2L I ''- � ��g� a°nCI Bt-al�J Ala 1-al[ - krt '0V' / � � "I IMF 1 A. j,.. " ,— . 1 LCCf y a LV r I. _K .4 / .. -��� re,µg LL7 7 _ =N12.) .,mar p'_ -2 i7 'y y�w a Tra III Q �• .,, y■f�]1I�_nHIC' TC Lf-- II I�r rp�v P 1 II IB �'bOVBf A'I 4 R1 A3 F7 AlI1.2. 4 —1.R� , A2 E1i IIEW ..'�� Al 1 G7/ lim r� x 7 zo•o o-r llTqkai .. / whip AlJAlA p} 11`` A3 A3 ' l'y�I� Ala all II q9 1.C:] .. _� Alai IA OS ' i lk.1 El■W • P3 r —r } . 1164 s?�. 9 Al • _� C 03 ?:lL:: d4 A3 4 .. �, el C1 et .'92 n�aan'#••Ba i`1a Aknvc}, L _ .•_s I��M 4 � T 1 1-� Halch incrares area Included in Wmamn ■ l-r apin svaca,minimum n'a 15'dimension j Building 2 I, ey .� i�1t l w!—� - — 42'HIS Wall I " 41". / �br2 Buildirg 1- ±2fl0 Surface Larking ---_Garage W2l Line Bolox 0 r�wI27 Tardem(Stalls) ...WI ^11 .. 1 n - l � •J �`d Q1 y;. .. fY] It Yin u Ln q.^Cape )ire) _ n nq YJI ±692' W illir rr(�r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f� /- PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER 0 4 i - ( ) '_�.) SHERWIN WILLIAMS _ SW 7005-'PURE WHITE' r07O� �o �1 rK II • 1A PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER �0 - • I im 0 L �2� PLASTER FINISHED EPS TRIM � - I - !I� T SHERWIN WILLIAMS �J ,� iii � r A SW 7507-'DRV DOCK' ® �� T _ --=-41/8 I I , ,3 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER C3) �' O SHERWIN WILLIAMS 'J, - - 4- -L �— sw7o7a-•sOPrwARE' - �J 2 111 Q___ 1 I up _ ,o PLASTER FINISHED EPS CORNICEICORBELS, WOOD TRELLISICOLUMNS �� SHERWIN WILIAMS 0-6 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER FIBER CEMENT-BOARD&BATTEN SIDING (`�) CONCRETE TILE ROOFING SW 0100-"UMBER RUST FINISH:16120 FINISH SAND FLOAT FINIS!I:SMOOTH MANUFACTURER:EAGLE ROOFING (SAMPLE FOR TEXTURE ONLY. (SAMPLE FOR TEXTURE ONLY, "CAPIST RANO-TERRACOTTA GOLD" REFER TO PAINT CHIP FOR FAINT COLORI REFER TO PAINT CHIP FOR PAINT COLOR) 'S PLASTER FINISHED EPS TRIM +rrrr..�'+7'.i"";'j 4-1'l- T� ,. irmr.m. '�5. SHERWIN WILLIAMS �l' .. "` - ' SW 6073-'PERFECT GREIGE' ii=-r,-r- t."?. _. w`N •w �i,yi._- -• . (7;1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, r >! Y P. A -�+. (6) PI ASTER FINISH FD OVERHANG - - •:+". A SHERWIN WILUAMS , y >• r - r' _ - • SW8257•'GIBRALTAR' rf.' _ � -- - , � METAL RAILING \J SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW sass-'LLAMA WOOL' (ii)VINYL NAIL-ON WINDOW& 0 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 12 FABRIC AWNING FIBERGLASS PATIO DOOR COLOR:LIGHT BRONZE ANODIZED COLOR:SUNBRELLA'MARINE GLUE" COLOR:WHITE i-1 FIBER CEMENT-BOARD&BATTEN ',B� SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 0120-'GREEN ONYX' (ter CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING 2 1, li.lwIng.2 Pmeo, I , , ,._ rr. IL L F II L r xxii :1_1 .L6 rr rir , 1111111` 111P ' rr nr1,1.1 _ li II PI ji rr ._ . 11 ....i ..,,, 1.1 _ cr r F IP r . _ II _. .„N 1,r. 7 IM F 1- r r n- 1, _ , _ I 10 , ell v IT r 10!.,ir Fr opoitioulout c @ .,,, i Conceptual North Elevation-Foothill Boulevard 6 , Buidln5,2 ., Paeao ,Buldt,1 , BUILDING 1 I 41111 .1 .e...... - PI I so '31 M 7 rr rr -- weh napr' I .— n . . -•.-Jr 0 . i i'l h-!,;',,;•3 ..+' ' ,__. ,,, T rrrrr .... 110thll .,„, r r ''1 '.,' ioti-v ..•-'. ',, u W Iii A ''''41- ', 52* .,:,,-.,`,`•-::: , v?“I Fr - al 1- V I/ - ii -AI ii - ,IFF r F in m _ 1 Ptiogin.. , 110011011•0141,0-ill -- --- - - - — 1 i• 11 ,4 1 10 .110 _ il _s am conc.p....r,h,evation- ••.ill tioulevard :1----- — — = — — ... . .1-2 rq I1 ' _-'' --',, , ,:. ii . 1 . i - miir jimn, Juiir iti,4 ,,, 1_-4,_T:i: , - ...",. .--1 -Furimilpillimmidp. io. ii ......., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rY-- (-- a r r(c (-pc virs, — BUILDING 1 . Building 1 Paean &iIding 2 . i; . . i i Err ; _ 1I 1 r r ri . .Fs a: FIF s \ C Rq• 0 0 0 ° Conceptual South Elevation-Parking ° ailL IUWP Buil9iig 2 , BUILDING 2 r!-1 0 I i �1 — -� 1r rFire`? - LFFT ,. n _ E rI rn ram.r, RI7 laV pp 1.. •.. III y _ n 7' , Conceptual South Elevation-Parking Ertenar Building Materials . ,�.._.._. - • �' 1 Exterior Cement Piaster 4 Numinum Storefront System 7 Metal Railing 10 Fiber Cement Board&Batten 13 Metal Downspout �J r•� � Alit Concrete Tile Roofing 5 TUrn wiECP Flniah B Metal Canopy 11 Plantar Wall 16 Metal glade Sign t t r ,ID. lffi:--Yr C ■ 3 Vinyl Wire.Sy9te01 8 Metal Screee B Wood Trellis 12 Motel Scupper 15 F199ter Fi09fiett Over neng "':y, '1 ' "S 3 S F i = .4— I6 Fable Awning "�I°, '���''�y^�C1� i iE 1 111,4 :,,', M _:" 11,71 '7111111F 11al! .i �_ -JillA1°FA11p l n lino F' - 11111i1111 11111 1IIIIIr DO RillFr impir ,{----. it _ , _ tl ,„, cc' rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING 1 I l\\\\\.; `offII IN I' :1',;',,,. ifT1 Ii.JIJI IIIIIIIIIIIIa ^ I^ I i k EN 11 " I�i II F.... r Inin r — III.nixl TA Wu1 I� l '4 a BUILDING 2 li ao-i j r •' ' � wr cr rLE F 0i 6 r i rq , f1 F l ili r r , iii i IIP .i^ `.I " T a r i! p ...., . - _ =.- , .. ..,______. Building 2 Conceptual East Elevation-Parking ^ — — �y' �dua� I cnnxExtorter Cement of n2 4 Tri minum Storefront System 7 Metal Caning 11 Flan Cement Board a Batten 13 Metal node S.nnt 2 VI Concrete W oThe roofing 5 Mot &ree Email a Metal Canopy 12 Marla&Wall 14 Metal Plaster Foa S,gn n^ 6 .4,4 u: 3 Vnyl W'ntlaw Sy91em 6 Me1aI5deEd g WoaC Tre1116 12 h1Nel SCugg2f 16 Febllo Fin ne Overhang 16 Febnc Awning e ca.y.e _ .o R r, 12:: ) r t6, "_ mil uunn and;�r , ,`1 iiim nuNi o I. TiT �iiin H i4i uI I Ij/I. crr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING 1 — s'I "irr E - fi E El m - 7 b . pr. �Y INNAWWN 1-17 hilm 0111 F. IT -- I rr Fri ri ::d : 1,, .I .,..-4„_ _.,..f _.L.—r .;.: F:-, -eir lam. iL Building 1 Conceptual East Elevation-Paseo BUILDING 2 4y I � r "`f' I F.' 1, m..a ..1 .,I 4 11 Buildin.2Come.f- :,rs r.t1 `aseu _ - =c _ Exterior Building Matenals • 1 t'/ •• — �d 3iill C T = '�. 1 Exterior Cement Plaster 4 Aluminum 5torefiont System 7 Metal Railing 10 Fiber Cement Board 5 Batten 13 Metal Cownspoul j- 646 2 Concrete TIM Roofing 5 TrlmwrFCP Final. a Metal Canopy 11 Planar Wall t4 Metal Slane Sign } „p I . k 4700.q 0 0 $ 3 Vinyl Window 5yetem a Metal SaceG 9 Wood Trellis 12 Mehl Scupper 15 Roster Fib ohetl Overhang `� s- .Awning _ ; —.. ;I " -- IlI e � _111111.Ap I II m�bir- 504 / r . .1 ��ITTII .T1�•I (IIlI�ll 11iDi11ii �lIIIA i4 � I Ma.. e , : +.¢a �rrr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1=1=111 Er' ih Tmi% 1- 1; .E.;- -..", - - El Indi g Immti E 17 ; ; IF P - a 1111111 ; E. A r E _. -. P , ..... ii . 11- IT , .. a. 'ev.ion-•r_ 71"+---r,,. Bulrmn:1 Conte., i-Ti4iA le?iin;-rd wall J 4 r r rn riE Fl E riij1 FE itdint 1 Come,t al Elevation-South Coil and Wall Building 1 Conceptual Elevation-East Courtyard Wall - — -�.._.._. gam._. — - ErtenOr Building Male,Ols t t t e r ,,IDID. 5� ■ _ - 1 Exterior Gement Nagar a Aluminum Storefront System 7 Metal Rating 10 F bar Cement Huard&Batten 15 Metal Downspout "':y •1 'S 3 S F i = '� 2 Concrete Tile hoofing 5 Tnm w1ECP Flniah a Metal Canopy 11 Planter Wall 14 Mani Blade B,gn 3 Vinyl Winslow System B Metal Sneed 9 Weed Trellis 12 Metal Scupper 15 Realer Fin aM1ed Overhang - t n Fac Ammo a y. R'' a� =ti _sti 4.. "ICI�J I. t`r " uun�tuu11n mVir 1;4 -I . ,IIIII S- ••.11�F' -' CIIIfriiiiiipilliII�IIIip D4 r(e r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t 111. ' s E Er Imo. ., . _ _ — -. Y ` e il flfi cm � 11111111, E L L s . - rr v a I IN 4 III• • r _ . � `` ■ Building 2 Conceptual Elevation-West Courtyard Wall Budding 2 Conceptual Elevation-North Courtyard Wall F iii - t _ _ l r a J mill , 'I'li 144,5; Building 2 Conceptual Elevation-South Courtyard Wall Building 2 Conceptual Elevation-East a ,,, exterior Building Materials tt./. -r.' fy — -. 1 Exterior Cement Plaster 4 Numnum Storefront System ] Metal Raffling 10 F bar Cement Board&Batten 13 Metal CournspdR x 3 d . = J._, 2 Concrete Tile Roofing 5 TNn wiECP Finish 5 Metal Canopy 11 Plantar Wall 14 Metal Slade Sign ��"' .21 3 VInyI W ndaw System 5 Metal Saved g Woad Trellis 12 Metal Scupper 15 Plaster weaned Overneng `� -p f •1 1= rre 16 Fahnc Awning 1 '! a .4 4 k 1 i z .m �C I — ..i m ' i. ! "__ w' uum uuw fi`r terrr , _ _ _ _1 f . —TAP OIf I IIlplllll llIp Di $1 • IF • 11 t14 4 rr �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , Building 2 : Paseo -. Building 1 IT . . .7„.: , slim 'LIE IP PI ' . .;••••,.,. : L A±,_:. . . .• , " .-; :',','' ..-.r, 7,,,:-,- II! -,;':'4,-'111 :..• ri .. .1,•9 ....4.1... ... . . i. .i .„...:::...t,!.. _ 1 ,., .. „..„.:..,..„. :.,...... _,.... .1.1..,,,„. .,. .,....,.. .., • 5,1•1 . , ._.,, _-..A. --= ,..,.: -:;,..4.c..114*Z.?I: •• .. ..:,'14.-:.:::.,,,:. .-....4,, ' . ...,,,,,A..... ._........:istz-W.T. - , • i•.,... ' , " ''' Ili'!'• ..... ].'....: i;..4.1.45*.. ' '- .:) -'''. . , 1:-. ':•_:. • ,H.,......,1-4,!.t'.1...,A;:.:# 0::".11w'-'.. •-•' :11 • 10 --.'' .: All . . , . „...... ..,„, ,.,. .„ . : .,..,• : .A _,_., -, 4.! • „.:••••.:-.4_;_....• i •.,,•eir-',••.: '•`:',0 :` -' - ••• • . - -ii;•.IZ -`--.:.--•.;,_'• i.0„_.•-.....i„...,. It::7:Z-.-:;1.'':.. -T.:7:"'.::„1 ____7,-17- ' ' — .i.19VA r- . . ..e.:,.-.:.,, .._..' -: ::- ....::.,..• ,. , • _. --.1,;,;',1v, .,Ink.-...a.. _....,—;-..- -.-....r .......--,,,i.„• •••.:.:. —oil RIM . ;.: . ,-. ,....;•loym . - • :__,• • _S..0 SHOP ,.'..,-,,,..4,,,....•1-...;„y-,.1.F., . ,...0FFE.-, ,,,,• ... ••'•••;:'. .4-,a•diall'1 ; . - : - -:- ] . , II .• 0 -1',A ._...:... ,....,A... l 0 IM,..., r, „14 1 - ._...,,i,.. , i • _,• , ii- . " '''' -.1/4 • W ' ' . • i..1' 1. ..... .' .• e:;'14'1.' ;-':-e• ,,-).:..""` ..k.- ..lir.f... -...-:, .- ...-:e-, ."-• .""- -..,,;:' i.. j.:-44.'4"-,F- — .ir, iiiiii..'Y •1"..:....,-:,.;-7,1''•• ,e1 — • .'. , u - - :ii..--0_ ••• - • ,.•4..A,71. :•11eiiiiii.iee.:;:,,,,,,,m,_::::..ii, . ,,,, • ..,i_. 1 i U./Work Uri ItudDir?cl.6.cces nor,r,ere.1 Space CarrnErcial Spry, Conceptual North Elevation•Foothill Boulevard . •-. 44'--,! "' :'•''.•...". :'S ‘ .:.;. . .,- ,.. .,. . .. .... ., . .,_ .. . . . . .. t .. -. ,"...... '111M'AI / . _ '. .-ir.il...' .-. . .0..!,,,,,:,-, - • • -....._- : ,.. ....m.- wail/4 '.'''''''1,7!t••''"."-"'..--:,"''i%-4 •-tA ". ''. ''..-:'."-' • -. "-''.--:•..''''- • " ''''''''''" ' .. • k" ..-- ,',-2iri, .,......- ''.. 'T.t`r•'m- , ".47.,T„.1t, , .. .'• 1 '-',. iL.i.'-- :, ;r:m.i.• .,.,.:' , -..; ' • . -•.....31C-Akii. -EtTallrair7 W%,. - . _ — • ...•' '• '! .:j,.4,':k.:,,,i.41t;•:-41: . -.•V4.4::- 4,, OP',•,,r- .,.,.9R,!_. ... .'• - ,.L.•Wii I \ . ......4111111a-- -••t" ...:-.7-.X.{.1.:4C-v--,111P.,, :44'iric. ._,. • ..-- -- - _..11.4: - L. \ , At- - • • ir-f-- -/- • -- - -,t.7,--,•• • k• li: , , ft i•,:. 11.1.. .., _. 7,7711. ._..., - • , _ . .71::: •-„VI -a.v..--••,: ,..• -..-) 4, -;:,A„ No . . '.••=-WF •C 'Ir' • ___ • - _._.... . . - , ...."5"• .2 r • •• ENLARGED PLAZA CONCEPT A k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ( ( a r ci- r-,r- PASEO Paape _R�`"�p ETIWANDA i !.FR� AVE -I� !•Ri F •v 1 �M.FM N• ` nse eo .9 d-a I I RESIDENCES PASEO Conceptual Section-A(building 1) TO THE EAST �ioa-to- , kbrheeid euuw sane ned by Keep. - gI L • q Med..eueen where rep.eeed] 7a �I va.0 , ray ; „Thud Fir :g . a„' !''`"y±i,'. r / .171[...._ a` 1 1 1 I and Frno_ _ 11=11- Conceptual Section-A(Building 2) Conceptual Section-B 4 rr- 1 rrcr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCES "° -6" r TO THE SOUTH -63 Marlearar°quipmm,w°en°e I. _I hypan�er.[Mech.eaean uhere _�_---- — �° FOOTHILL - "- BLVD c«,M=m I , s°co,a_� 1 i Conceptual Section-B(Building 1) L-125'--5' RESIDENCES e TO THE SOUTH "��°" "°�'"�' a�re,e,. 'L. t .F.Wrtp„ FOOTHILL h BLVD v . \ I L l _ .Se me F. . : }- fIInD .1 Guy"L¢"k44.... .. C_, L_ L_ I I .....r i Conceptual Section-B 4 ri-Fit. r-' . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' A' o. - -r�-Tv. " r r • ill, kiiiiiii 'at .J � c �I .��' 1mil ` 'agt ;,� 1 ill 1 1, , ] I I 1 11 ll p 1 1 +- _ I. MAC ! .Al A R�� ]F'I�ti , -- - .� i,Tl I 'i il` f1 i on CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . .,.., ..{....=..... .'Alet! -- '''-''- -..., ,.... ...--.11, . ___......._....... ....... _...........N. .. .,. .• Emlim. ,- [ . ._ ... lipI.110 . ...", -- !LPN ' T rr...• - ••- 1 -- -: - • •-• :• ,. . i. . IL: ,a- IN.110 4111! PP - i' p. 1.1. 4 --, IHfl• TMIINXIIIIIMMIIMMONWM • , ... --------•--....,,,ftvAl.... 5 -'4IMW 1111i ill1111. Hil: ! 11 I' ET'1111111111'11111111111"'III'r 11101114r IIIIIIpr,, '1T1111111111111111#11111111111 i'"".'11111111111a11111111111 - Al ALA 1 AL A A-111 1.....a.„..! III!__ _ ---WSIIIM ----- —--.....---- 1 — — ,---,...-- -- - ---- ""Ilmmommins.K.- - —dr— i ii rcr.k `-, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr.rF4(cr r((- 11, 4r^, 1 AL le ,40101.11.111114:- . '.--- -----.------------ ....01..54 I • ,,- 1-- . _ 11 ill , -1 .j ii . 7.7 , 1 ,,,.... . ._. , ,. . __,. 1,iimuil , - 1i 1 , ). i_ 11,, .. _... . , ,. , , ,• .i.,.__ _-I r " b. . , . 4— • -',•••,••..,;,,V. N..-"..r.'.:j or•' ••,:.' ,.. ::;Vr,'4,.,..._-i..;e':.i.!•..,4....-!:T.!:V.'...,'.,,i,-.,.. 1.. ',.'.;.,-.•-,••i.••;..••.,*!. ,.;••-i,i•:Pil,t.•"i.•,.•f•.•.•;•:.'..,.-2j.."':4.:.4...1t.4ro1.k.;_+,-;!-_,.',.::4..:'.1-....'..6.,,e..--:-1%*...;,.i...:4.,,_..•:••._1_-.-,,;i.:..::,e._'TI.,Tr.•.•. F.r-T 7 7 ..-4,."-,.:...•,,•,,•.,:4•!.'..-7•„.7:::.-'- - • -• . ;: • ••..• ,... . _ - - - I 1 - i t „ t1. ...„ .,•-, 4 ; ....,., "AFt,dr..•••• ''',• !.,t; ••:''q',`.:v.. .9.-';i.. .' 4,i-e--:,•:VI.-.,1.'::-. .1...-:,42.:',...i:,.,,,..,..: .•;•.•• -- .'•.4::‘t''..,.. ilrt'?:•:'ig•ii i--..;;;:-..:•ir ._.,...2... ...42:::•,,,`, -.7-: ....,. ..• \-4,i''... :p.f.- ;:,.....,.....,-.:,.-4,4- ---- 1111.111 . '4,.:4,-.'L:P:• ..'f.:141...• -' ' .-..;...:;.. •,..',,•,.. ..i..,....4!p•:."'''.-'._. ;:-.....,.••••....,“.,milotivi'0061491 11' .111F 7).. •,,i,.-.f.',. ,—. ,,,,,,..:4'n-.1:•.'7,...r. .. ... . - .-•:#.`14‘...:::,Fc.44•W_ .. ,K•-....- --ill:11 --•:•'• ,,.'''-' ...• ii ..•.-- ... -. ... -.,..4:67-1;.... ..'„:.;:.. .:.. . ... .. .. . . "" ... ...,R. ...L.1. .-..,e_...-.. - • •. . -, ...._- - .t .1 . •—.•I ),-! - . . .. . - r --------- '• . ----111111Nt- - ..' -,. •• .r-4,- -.Yr'•-• ,! -,`?•7.:. • ":•4'llil .. ....---- -• • - .: : ,..-r •-,-,-.5'.--....,'. ----- 4)::'-:-;74--r".r;rr .","-h-'17:.....:;.....7.• '',1.r.c...„.44 i, , ,1•!.'- '''"7 •..• ,C I• NIP Itt Ill ....... . ___ _..,-"......T. a 171$*:,.::..-;:.74,7„..4-::. .•,.... .--1.150 ..4'6-I...:•'.. ..._. - :.-... . - ...' -I. : :tit..;...?,:.44.4'40.1,:r.rit,": ,'•H-" '':. .... •, . :. • - .0..-• # S . I• Il i ,ft...,. •..:,-s.,..,,....,:.*It........ Xts..74,-ri r i 1 1„1 , 1 4AP XP:, _- ---_-, .. . '' li; • - 4._ . . 4 •:.•• N. • .._:• .. '-.., -1,.. , -.7 .•,,.... _ 46 , — •: iz A,;44Q,0,-,..:M..07 i••....... ,-...-.. ... • .- ..... .. . .-... ,40,410) '..,....4r.••, ...• • .! .'.. ..k.-• .1%•,.. 41 ••••••:•-..- • ..•..i, ...:.:f111111k - .6;•,: ,..:.p. . ..r.z.. ...,. .. .. • .,.... ..,;.,„.:-.1r,•- :44(t.,7/-- .!•-.. t-:-.:.-i - . ..... .. ,.:iei.::::.:1011 II . -r-'', • • ,i fill N., :_-_.:,..„.i_.,,,,,,.,..:. ....,-,-;--,;4..: ........ .. ..c.z.)„,..„, . ,./ r , • ... .. . ..-. . . ..y.-.. , ,..k...,,,:i:,,h..,..:,,,:,..::,,,...-..,,,,..at.,.,.. :,..,..J.,:..:,:„::!..:.,:, .:._ .-.- ..; ,.-:,.... .:. .. •..... _...._..)?/-' ...., . ritivm.4',..:.,-....,.,::.,...,, '.;.7-•,...::.... ,. . ..,:,•-.-...,.. ._ ... 1-•Cii-2- ':.•••-• -•- '!_... P i r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r- r- (-- arkr r(c (-pc ill,r, • jai& , ,. _ _•,„ iu,, _ Ip-J171 „, If #i I ,,iti T , iv,. sm _ . 7 - i1 -- 4 N, _ I '1 .,,__ ',0:• UIJIIIJ If EiId____,lIrwE. _, _1HE111l11 IlL I S_HOP A _ = • f .+:•i ,. j--- =l1i. . ,.Z..-,1,,,. .:i:, l„.Nc::„..;-.,.„,..0: k F _a op, i ,0. + COFFEE COFFEES„' .; ...1.,¢ ! _; y rrs yaY w a • F � 4, � • • . tel: - - 1°....."41\(._ . �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Unit Composition • 259 Residential Units • 184 one bedroom • 55 two bedroom • 20 three bedroom • 1 Live-Work Unit • One bedroom • 816 square-feet of commercial-ready space • 2 Commercial Units • 2,253 square-feet ccr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Standard Required Proposed Complies Building Setback—Foothill(Major) 11'-3"min. 29'-6" YES ✓ Parking Setback—Foothill (Major) 7'-6"min. 32'-9" YES✓ Landscape and Wall Setback—Foothill (Major) 11' 3"min. avg. 34' 7"avg. YES✓ 7'-6"min. 26'-6"Min Building Setback—Etiwanda(Tertiary) 8'-9" 17' YES✓ Parking Setback—Etiwanda(Tertiary) 6'-3" 35' YES✓ Landscape and Wall Setback—Etiwanda(Tertiary) 8'-9"min.avg. 17'avg. YES✓ 6'-3"min. 17' min. Interior Side Setback 20' 102' YES✓ Interior Rear Setback 25' 77'—3" YES✓ Building Height 75' max., 25'within 100'of 59'-8"max, 25'within YES✓ residential 100'of residential Landscape Area 10% 14.2% YES✓ Open Space 150 sf/unit(39,000 sf) 48,350 sf YES ✓ v rr-kr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 41).(-r PARKING ANALYSIS Number Square Parking Ratio of Units Footage Required Parking Multi-family unit 184 N/A 1.5 per unit 276 (one bedroom) (1 in garage or carport) Multi-family unit 55 N/A 2 per unit 110 (two bedrooms) (1 in garage or carport) Multi-family unit 20 N/A 2 per unit 40 (three bedrooms) (2 in garage or carport) Live-Work 1 816 1.5 per unit 2 (1-bedroom units) (1 in garage or carport) Visitor parking 260 N/A 1 per 3 units 87 Commercial (including Live-Work 2 3,339 4 per 1,000 13 portion) Total Parking Spaces Required 528 Total Parking Spaces Provided 528 Total Garage Parking Spaces Required/Provided 280/328 � �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Alta Cuvee Apartments Building 1 Building 2 — Foathdl Blvd Parking Management Plan --• - — — -. Drawings -5 ..-- - ._ - — — 1*i . - f�. ' , r• r-. .,na s Ground Level f t `�' _ - _ :.. Y. `' ��Imi ,,t..*7_ m. or Cam' �' Ir ! 14I• Guest/Visitor-87 spacesI �hj� '��'' a.akn,...c.:„..;:,, .. gf" q..- _ • i_,��°°;�-� ii,�-•,�_ .•- IAssigned Residential-Building 1—50 spaces l "'" ' t ",g �'., rau i.Ri '," "' "'■"' :2r, a++�+• Assigned Residential-Building 2—50 spaces 1-. PP;1:■_",. Fl �+! ■i M■!:M , t MR._ • Commercial—13 spaces 'nl r ", =� "' ` "'u, •� "+ yif■! Counyetd ! _ • - _ - m yT.c, e, Courtyard 4!i■ fee- x, "- '1 ..,sc, p �+ ' :sa■+or 1■ • ' a Unit Mix ., .% _ Fri `� t ', 1 ��' '. �'1 a,-a. mink • • ai m Building 1 c . • - N i , -. '. 9 14 • Live/Work—0 apartments t t" �w�`.ri ...... � • L 28 1 I I .A.l K!•Yw.mrvm1m R.tY Mw•P •Buildingi 2 • 1 Bedroom-83 apartments ,�' .-: - Lt .�m►.Y. • 2 Bedroom—33 apartments �_ 12 _ sa 9 14 • 3 Bedroom—6 apartments / ` / kg 1 uoaSurfacer b 4 Building t qr r.oe.n,SW _ Clomp Wain. - - ,l - - - - - - - - - "r_ Building 2 61 f F • Live/Work-1 apartments ° W 7 'f 71// 'lad VI I .Aar ' 7 .i 'Y If I 4, ' • 1 Bedroom—101apartments r I 7` ak a 7,1: °_ ••-'r • 2 Bedroom—22 apartments •r • 3 Bedroom—14 apartments Site Plan-Ground Level car CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parking Management Plan FDOTHILLBLV❑ Drawings ----_--_---- r 21 J Basement Level % S •�■■■�� ! 20 10 1 •;� 35 �� al Guest/Visitor—Ospaces j _, • Assigned Residential-Building 1—153 spaces / I ® 1$ • Assigned Residential-Building 2—175 spaces J 1 34 �� � 24 ��, Ma__, ___�r • Commercial—Ospaces � F.` �1- 57 .11111 ' �, qI� 34 �� 1 __1.. 2 — T ±32 Garage Parking noo r..Vt..shall Unit Mix 'I' 'i i 1 36 I —" Building 1 h • Live/Work—0 apartments • 1 Bedroom—83 apartments I 21 - • 2 Bedroom—33 apartments • 3 Bedroom—6 apartments E Building 2 • Live/Work—1 apartments ' • 1 Bedroom—101 apartments TI • 2 Bedroom—22 apartments • 3 Bedroom—14 apartments Site Plan-Garage Level r. (- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review Committee ( DRC) • First Review on June 1 , 2021 : Committee expressed concerns regarding: • Recreational amenities • Commercial square footage • Parking • Second Review on June 20, 2021 : Committee voted to move the project forward for Planning Commission consideration. c(err CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Neighborhood Meeting • First Meeting on March 30, 2021 (Via Zoom): • 11 attendees • Questions about entitlement process • Parking impacts to surrounding neighborhood • Second Review on June 20, 2021 (In-Person): • 13 attendees • Parking overflow issues • Loss of privacy • Publicly-accessible amenities ccr� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Art • Project is subject to Public Art requirement. Total art value required is $198,339. • Project has been conditioned to meet the Public Art requirement prior to occupancy. e� �'' � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Assessment • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared for the project. Staff provided notice for a public comment period which started on September 1 , 2021 , ending on October 1 , 2021 . • Responses to comments from the original public comment period were incorporated in a revised MND, which was recirculated for public comment from February 8, 2022, to February 28, 2022. • Responses to comments from the second public comment period have been incorporated into the final response to comments section of the MND. • AB 52 and SB 18 notices mailed to tribal governments. Two tribes responded and concerns have been incorporated into Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. • Staff believes the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately addresses all potential environmental impacts and has incorporated the necessary mitigations to minimize such impacts. c7-�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Correspondence • Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet (40 property owners) on March 29, 2022 and published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on March 30, 2022. • Staff received a letter from Lozeau Drury, LLP containing comments regarding the adequacy of the recirculated IS/MND. (-(e�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission : • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Design Review DRC2020-00440 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. r-Frcr• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i-rA.,(t.f(r- RANCHO 1,( (c,(f-- CUCAMONGA Planning Commission April 13 , 2022 cit P-1 tl) w • � a 0 CD r-C • t-4 Cit ;-4 CtCDQ w p CD U C.) � W A-) P4 CZ; ;- 14 ct v� 4. a, o ar"C: (4- 0 cA ral 0 a) 0 l CD ti) v� U 0 c> a> >C aU � 0 Z4) r � RANCHO Background of the RC EIFD and PFA • City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention on February 16 , 2022 , to initiate the formation of the RC EIFD and establish the PFA . • The PFA is the governing board of the RC EIFD . • Fire Board of Directors adopted a Resolution to participate in the RC EIFD . r � RANCHO Overview of If t t Financing nrasrucureCUCAMONGA Plan • PFA to directed the preparation of the Infrastructure Financinc Plan ( IFP ) on March 8 , 2022 . • The DraftlFPwas: 1 . Published on the EIFD 's Website (www. cityofrc . us/E I FD ) ; 2 . Noticed to the properties and affected taxinc entities ; and 3 . Transm itted to the appropriate governinc bodies . • Commission received the IFP via email on March 24 , 2022 . • Presented the Draft IFPtothe PFAon April 5 , 2022 . rrqrri (1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A Enhanced Infras uctur - Financing District (EIFD) Presentation raft frastructure financing ' lan to thub1ic Financing Authority (PFA) Prepared by: Kosmont Companies Executive Summary • Rancho Cucamonga has significant potential for new private sector investment and development of regional significance (~$5+ billion ) over the next 20 years across multiple opportunity site areas in the City (downtown/TOD area, eastern industrial area, other) • Investments in critical infrastructure are needed to support new development, such as parking and transportation connectivity infrastructure and related public improvements • An EIFD was evaluated by staff and consultants as a critical tool to address infrastructure funding needs by capturing value from future development in the form of future property tax increment • On February 16, 2022, City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to form the EIFD and has established this PFA Board to govern and manage EIFD formation and future operations • On March 8, 2022 , the PFA held its inaugural meeting to provide the PFA with a general overview of EIFD, answer questions, and direct the preparation of the governing Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) . • A follow up public meeting was on April 5, 2022. Public hearings coming up in May-July. 6 kosnioAL Tax Increment Mechanics illustrative $700M $600M $500M $400M Period of New Incremental A/V from Increment Assessed Value Development New Development Available to (A/V) within TIF TIF District District $300M ; i Boundaries ; $200M i • • Incremental Growth �' of Existing A/V $100M / / / .- , . ., ,,-, / /7/- ;,,;. /44 $OM 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 95 Years from District Formation 7 kosnionN,, Note: Illustrative. Conservative 2% growth of existing assessed value (A/V) shown; does not include mark-to-market increases associated with property sales. EIFD Fundamentals Long Term Districts 45 years from first bond issuance; long-term committed revenues; districts can be formed in 12- 18 months Governance Public Financing Authority (PFA) led by city or county implements Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) — IFP is the investment plan of the EIFD, managed by the PFA Approvals Mandatory public hearings for formation (includes protest opportunity); no public vote to issue debt Non-contiguous EIFD project areas do not have to be contiguous, allowing them to target specific sites / areas and making Areas them compatible with other zoning / entitlement strategies Eligible Projects Any property with useful life of 15+ years & of communitywide significance; purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, rehabilitation, and maintenance Does NOT increase property taxes 8 kosrnann,a Types of P CanFund ar •lal Li-1,'• ' . • -I .- 11111 re7-,—.. .... -, —.................____ tiatii... . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . _ . . ..;.. . _. ._....., _ . - ,., i.k 1.. _ - . . 1 : _ . . . _ . ... :,, .... ... .. .. , ‘ . . , _ _., , 1 _ ____ ...... ,......, - - . 0 1 ..: _. 1 -. Kr—r :4- . .„ ,,,t. ......__ .....,_ • ., ___...... _ __ ...,,,. ...„....„__, _.,...„. .. , _ ___„„,,,N, _.„....._,_ ...,, , . , „ . _ _ _......... r . . ...30. _ __,_ ; ,. ___,, _.. ... t .,,.._,,,.,,„. • ...,..,,, , _ ______ . 4... , . ,rf- k: , • .111624._—:tTri4i.tirI . ,:liiii_ fi , ._.—:—\—7. i!roarfar �_ -•- _ _ _ Win:' ..-. .. . . ....: _ _ . F. Water / Sewer / Storm / Flood Roadway / Parking / Transit Parks / Open Space / Recreation .,ate ., _, ■.,....-. . .• ,..:. K yy I. L. �.}+ .r. • ti,. _ •• -- • • . • • -"....,. - h. •1! .. w ,...:_. -. IL--•:a .14- L '-_- — r.i•cs , r mi l [ ar•1111 �y k �. .- 4 ri, .il it,- .,,.,-,„.:0.- 7 . • - • k7 i ter ,' -mow • _."' • #.. r� .: . .. • Childcare Facilities & Libraries Brownfield Remediation Affordable Housing 1.41 r , 1. _ald 1111r.i'll.77. - I.. Illi — ! Ili • I v. 1.-. ' \ •...IN... - 11 i' itil J. II 111 ri - 44101111.-- . • r •, '• ' •• ram" .. iii _ ii 044 , . " . 9 AL Broadband Wildfire Prevention / Other Small Business / kosmonnks Climate Change Response Nonprofit Facilities Why are Public Agencies Authorizing EIFDs? 1 . Return on Investment: Private sector investment induced by district commitment accelerates growth of net fiscal revenues , job creation , housing production , essential infrastructure improvements 2 . Ability to attract additional funds ("OPM") — tax increment from other entities (county, special districts), federal / state grants / loans (e .g . for TOD , water, housing , parks, remediation ) 3 . Commitment of future revenues (versus existing revenues) to catalyze economic development that would not occur as quickly or intensely but for the TIF commitment io kosR urisdiction Pun ose Azusa Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure EJ:E"Is in Procffess Statevvide Brentwood Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Buena Park Mall reimagination, housing-supportive infrastructure (Partial Carson + L.A. County Remediation, housing infrastructure, recreation Coachella Valley Association of Govts (CVAG) Cities Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Covina Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure El Cajon Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure El Segundo + L.A. County Various infrastructure, regional connectivity Medford c r''�'r� '� BASINFairfield Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Fresno Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure • �;.a Fresno County Industrial and commercial supportive infrastructure . Forest lir Shade Humboldt County Mixed-use & energy supportive infrastructure F•Jaiian•A F'' • Irrrr � h r ;f Fare at "r. Indian Wells Housing and tourism-supportive infrastructure �A, - Imperial County Housing and greenfield infrastructure i La Verne + L.A. County Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure r " ' Long Beach (Multiple Districts) Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure •-,,. , • Los Angeles (Downtown, San Pedro) Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure _ •-. ,xCar}on Cit. . C~JE\AEI. . • • ( G R E A T Los Angeles County Uninc.West Carson Housing / bio-science / tech infrastructure 111116 acr ento '. 8 A I , ' Madera County (Two Districts) Greenfield infrastructure (water / sewer) Modesto + Stanislaus County Housing, transit, recreation-supportive infrastructure San Illr z- .. Francis ill -7' Mount Shasta + Siskoyou County Rural Brownfield site mixed-use infrastructure �. . . San .a 5e ..., Napa Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Ontario Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure oii5 ` .#bil x ' Palmdale + L.A. County Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Fre3no } � 4 .-' ; • - L.35 Vegas Pittsburg Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure r ` ` Placentia + Orange County Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure 7- . CY,/.41.1f E 4 ' Redondo Beach + L.A. County Parks / open space, recreation infrastructure c cFF•ai. Riverside Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Los s Padres Sacramento County (Unincorporated) Industrial / commercial supportive infrastructure NFore�` San Bernardino CountyTransit-su ortive infrastructure :. 11i I& PP ` San Jose Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Sanger Housing and commercial supportive infrastructure + s0 Santa Ana Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure San Di g -, DE South Gate Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure t) - - �ulexicali TO all -- ._ West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Cities Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure `'r., } Yucaipa Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure o on 11 Fully Formed In Formation Process Under Evaluation Contents of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (lIP) A. Description of the District B . Description of Proposed Facilities and Development C . Finding of Communitywide Significance D . Financing Section E. Goals of the District F. Appendices (e.g. , Map, Legal Description, Financial Analysis Detail) 12 kosnionN,, Preliminary EIFD — - , , .... , ..____ _ _______. .... _ Proposed EIFD Parcels i 1 1` lJ ----- City Limits � ` �` • Approx. 1 500 acres (6 .0% of I J Citywide acreage) Al mend St 3 11..1n H°; 1 � � fl.r_l,t�er tr. �� vi �_� • Approx.$729M in existing } �ti5,�n Awe .r v_I . . I k Chaffey College assessed value (2 . 7 % of Citywide ilk School `,- 1 Banyan St Banyan SS Banoyan St II / V)› iemorr ae n ,Zinto V:r Catch / B slrr Lemon Ave 9,e Dr ,9, A:t.1 Loma Qr pa. v V.c# fr , r,ci Et;war • Strategically defined to capture value from potential future Upland rillsl . , w Country Club Base Line Rd v Bast Line Rd development and optimize the . >_ Ce I EIFD 's abilityto finance public � r I i a n ' trt-6a>-. Arrbiw R te k it0 `� tf, ,, 15 facilities o x y .: 14.1 "_ . 340 R cha 0 - !. "1 'J_i t1,,".'.ieIk: T. Cucana W I0.1 DibiliI t Nall Ic.r} . . Q I 3 Kaiser eth Cucamo a - __ — Source: CityofRancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino CountyAuditor- ��tn St � el - �[i � � 9 { , , ,,, �, �� 3 Controller (2022) E 6,t h S r X { '—' 61 n 13 e 5tf, 1t I ; n kos 1 N nice C41h5t rt�+#, ----- - - -L SartBernard,naA.s, . Future Development Assumptions Absorption Assumed over 5-20 Y Area # SF or Units Estimated Estimated AV Factor Total AV at Buildout For-sale Residential 1 ,514 units $618,000 per unit $936 million Rental Residential 10, 253 units $317 ,000 per unit $3.255 billion Hotel 171 rooms $ 162 ,000 per room $28 million Commercial / Retail 922 ,000 SF $274 PSF $253 million Office 222 ,000 SF $211 PSF $47 million Industrial 6 , 272 ,400 SF $ 172 PSF $ 1 . 079 billion Total New Development Assumed within EIFD Study Area $5 . 597 billion 14 Note: AV at buildout values in current 2022 dollars.. ko f]O Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga, CoStar (2022) cnrup:�nics Targeted Infrastructure Improvements Potential Priority Projects Estimated Cost Estimated Timing 1 ) Parking infrastructure and related improvements between Haven $20-40M 2028-2032 Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard along Foothill Corridor 2) Transportation Connectivity Improvements linking Cucamonga $40-60M 2028-2032 Station and Haven / Arrow focus area Estimated Total Priority Projects $60- 100M • Potential projects were identified based on alignment of timing of funding needs and timing of EIFD funding capacity • Projects that would catalyze and support future development while delivering significant communitywide benefits 15 kosnionN„ Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga (2022) Financing Section • Based on projected growth of assessed value and property tax increment, the City and Fire District would be allocating incremental tax revenues of: • City - 38% of projected property tax increment ($98 million) • Fire - 26 % of projected property tax increment ($ 158 million) • Proposed funding scenario supports up to $ 100 million in debt issuance for targeted infrastructure , as well as related future maintenance costs . • Total debt service estimates for a 30-year bond is $233 million. • Strategy was to generate sufficient EIFD funding capacity for the estimated costs of public facilities, maintenance , and administration. 16 kosnionNe, Proposed Tax Increment Allocations from City and Fire Protection District over Time 120% $10,000,000 =Total Annual Revenue $9,000,000 loo°ro —City Percentage $8,000,000 Fire Percentage $7,000,000 80% $6,000,000 _ 1::: I I $3,000,000 $2,000,000 20% $1,000,000 0% • $0 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 • Average allocation of 38% of City tax increment (no MVLF in-lieu) from parcels within boundary o 17 • Average allocation of 26 % of Fire tax increment from parcels within boundary ko moAL Estimated Fiscal m aC s Annual Year 0-50 Year 0-50 (Stablized Nominal Present Value Year 20) Total @ 3.0% City of Rancho Cucamonga Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD) $25,486,770 $ 1 ,620,569,600 $650,817,300 Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $20,218, 100 $ 1 ,257,660, 100 $505,229,600 Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $5,268,670 $362 ,909,500 $145,587, 700 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD) $5,795,350 $462, 129,400 $ 171 ,640,900 Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $4,613,300 $286,979,900 $ 115,294,800 Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to Fire District $1 , 182 ,050 $175, 149,500 $56,346, 100 18 o s tl . Note: Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure. $2022 COr0Imrdcs ��{�� RANCHO Ne xt Steps CU CAMONGA The CityStaffrecommends the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution which documents : 1 . Planninc Commission to be informed about the IFP ; 2 . Make findings of General Plan conformance ; and 3 . Review of CEQA documentation . . . RA NC H O (-- �� CUCAMONGA LOZEAU DRU RY. P T 510.935.4200 1939 Harrison Street,Ste.150 www.lozeaudrury.com F 510.936.4205 Oakland,CA 94612 victona@lozeaudrury.com Via Email April 13, 2022 Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 vincent.acuna@cityofrc.us Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Elizabeth Thornhill 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us Re: Comment on the Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project (DRC2020-00440) Dear Mr. Acuna and Planning Commissioners: I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER")regarding the Recirculated Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("RIS/MND")prepared for the proposed Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project(DRC2020-0440), including all actions related or referring to the proposed construction, use, and maintenance of a 260-unit apartment community, located at 12901-12939 Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga("Project"). SAFER submitted comments on the original Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration("IS/MND") on October 1, 2021. SAFER's October comment was prepared with the assistance of expert reviews by Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CIH, wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., and environmental consulting firm Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE"). Based on these expert reviews, we concluded that the IS/MND failed as an informational document, and that there was a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, we requested that the City of Rancho Cucamonga("City")prepare an environmental impact report("EIR") for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code ("PRC") section 21000, et seq. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 The City prepared and published a Notice of Intent("NOI") to adopt the RIS/MND on February 9, 2022. According to the NOI, the City recirculated the IS/MND for the proposed Project to clarify changes that have risen during or since the public review period. After reviewing the RIS/MND, we also conclude the RIS/MND also fails as an informational document, and that there is a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, we request once more that the City prepare an EIR for the Project pursuant to CEQA, PRC section 21000, et seq. This supplemental comment on the RIS/MND has been prepared with the assistance of expert reviews by Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CDT, wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., and environmental consulting firm SWAPE. Mr. Offerman's comment on the original IS/MND and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Mr. Smallwood's comment is attached as Exhibit B hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. SWAPE's comment and the consultants' curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit C hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. SAFER's October 1, 2021 comments on the original IS/MND are attached as Exhibit D hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. DISCUSSION I. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project Will Have a Significant Health Risk Impact from its Indoor Air Quality Impacts. Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CIH, has conducted a review of the RIS/MND and relevant documents regarding the proposed Project's indoor air emissions, and concluded that his Indoor Environmental Engineering Comments (September 24, 2021) (Exhibit A) regarding the IS/MND, submitted by SAFER on October 1, 2021, still apply to the RIS/MND. Mr. Offermann concludes that it is likely that the Project will expose residents and commercial/industrial employees of the Project to significant impacts related to indoor air quality, and in particular, emissions of the cancer-causing chemical formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann is a leading expert on indoor air quality and has published extensively on the topic. Mr. Offermann's expert comments and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A. Even after receipt of SAFER and Mr. Offerman's October 1, 2021 comments on the IS/MND, which identified the Project's significant health risk impact from its indoor air emissions from formaldehyde, the RIS/MND does not evaluate the human health risks as a result of the Project's formaldehyde emissions. As SAFER's previous comments noted, the failure to address the Project's formaldehyde emissions is contrary to the California Supreme Court's decision in California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2015) 62 Ca1.4th 369, 386. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 Because Mr. Offermann's expert review is substantial evidence of a fair argument of a significant environmental impact to future users of the Project, an EIR must be prepared to disclose and mitigate those impacts. II. The RIS/MND Fails to Adequately Mitigate the Potential Adverse Impacts of the Project on Wildlife. After review of the RIS/MND, wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., concludes that the Project may have significant impacts on several special status species. An EIR is required to mitigate these impacts. Dr. Smallwood's conclusions were informed by wildlife biologist Noriko Smallwood's site visit in September 2021. Ms. Smallwood visited the site of the proposed Project on Dr. Smallwood's behalf for nearly 2 hours from 06:54 to 08:42 hours on September 4, 2021. Dr. Smallwood's expert comments on the IS/MND and curriculum vitae are included as Exhibit A in SAFER's October 1, 2021 comments attached hereto as Exhibit D. Dr. Smallwood's expert comments on the RIS/MND are included at Exhibit B. A. The wildlife baseline relied upon by the RIS/MND is still woefully inadequate. Wildlife biologist Dr. Smallwood's review of the impacts to wildlife from the Project concluded that the Project may have significant impacts on several special-status species. An EIR is required to analyze these impacts. Dr. Smallwood asserts that the RIS/MND does an"only" "slightly better job of characterizing baseline conditions of the site,"because it includes lists of species that were detected during the City's only reconnaissance-level survey that the IS/MND originally omitted. (Ex. B, p. 1.)According to Dr. Smallwood: "what was not improved, and what warranted an improvement, was a follow-up survey(or multiple surveys) at an appropriate time of day for wildlife." (Ex. B,p. 1.) Dr. Smallwood further explains: The RIS/MND ignores Noriko's survey results and what they mean to the characterization of the existing environmental setting and the likelihoods of special-status species occurrences. The RIS/MND misleadingly reports, "no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed within the biological survey area during the reconnaissance field survey." This reporting is misleading not only because it ignores the special-status species that Noriko detected, but also attempts to pass off the AECOM survey effort as sufficient for detecting special- status species. It was not. No reconnaissance-level survey effort is capable of detecting all the species that use a site, including those that use it seasons and times of day other than when the reconnaissance-level survey was performed. Furthermore, no biologist is perfect at detecting the species of wildlife that are available to be detected at the time of the survey. For these reasons, to characterize the wildlife community at a site, multiple methods and multiple surveys are needed. (Ex. B,pp. 2-3.) Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 Hence, RIS/MND's baseline for biological impacts continues to be inadequate, incomplete, and understates the biological values at the Project site. (See, Ex. B,pp. 1-5.) Dr. Smallwood concludes that: "A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately assess occurrence likelihoods of special-status species as part of the characterization of the current environmental setting." (Ex. B,p. 6.) In conclusion, the RIS/MND's failure to adequately evaluate the significance of the impacts to special-status species of wildlife violates CEQA. Thus, the Project requires an EIR to properly mitigate wildlife impacts of the Project. B. The RIS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impact on loss of breeding capacity. Neither the original IS/MND nor the RIS/MND assess the lost breeding capacity of birds that would result from the Project. Instead, the RIS/MND ignores Dr. Smallwood's comments regarding habitat loss to breeding birds. (Ex. B,p. 6.) Specifically, Dr. Smallwood's prediction that the proposed Project"would deny Californian's of 116 birds per year." (Ex. B,p. 6.) This potential loss of birds every year following construction of the Project easily qualifies as a significant, unmitigated impact that has not been analyzed. An EIR is required to fully analyze the Project's impact on lost breeding capacity, and to mitigate that impact. C. The RIS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife movement. The RIS/MND, like the IS/MND, fails to address impacts to wildlife movement, and instead looks for impacts to a wildlife corridor. (Ex. B, pp. 6-7.) In doing so, the RIS/MND ignores Dr. Smallwood's "comments regarding wildlife movement and how, in its analysis, the RIS/MND applies a false CEQA standard centered on whether the site is part of a wildlife movement corridor." (Ex. B,pp. 6-7.)As Dr. Smallwood points out, "[t]he CEQA standard does not rely on whether the site is part of a corridor." (Ex. B, p. 7.) Therefore, the RIS/MND improperly dismisses the Project's potential to significantly impact wildlife movement. Such impacts to wildlife movement from the Project's construction and operation should be addressed in an EIR and mitigated accordingly. D. The RIS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife by window collisions. Dr. Smallwood's comments conclude that the Project will have a significant impact on birds as a result of window collisions. (See, Ex. B,p. 7.) But neither the IS/MND nor the RIS/MND express any concern about bird-window collision impacts, nor do they propose any mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for such impacts to special-status bird species. Rather, the RIS/MND ignores Dr. Smallwood's comments regarding bird-window collision mortality, which he "predicted would be 234 bird deaths per year(95% CI: 139-329)." (Ex. B, p. 7.) As Dr. Smallwood points out, "this level of mortality would qualify as a Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 significant, unmitigated impact." (Ex. B,p. 7.) Thus, an EIR needs to be prepared to appropriately analyze the impacts of bird-window collisions, and mitigate accordingly. E. The RIS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife from additional traffic generated by the Project. Dr. Smallwood identifies the serious impacts that increased traffic has on wildlife. (Ex. B,p. 7.)Analyzing the potential impact on wildlife due to vehicle collisions is especially important because "traffic impacts have taken devastating tolls on wildlife" across North America. (Ex. D, p. 17 [citing Forman et al. 2003].) In the United States alone, estimates for "avian mortality on roads is 2,200 to 8,405 deaths per 100 km per year, or 89 million to 340 million total per year." (Ex. D,p. 17 [citing Loss et al. 2014].) The RIS/MND ignores Dr. Smallwood's comments regarding mortality caused by project-generated traffic. Dr. Smallwood predicted that"the Project's traffic would cause 3,276 wildlife fatalities per year." (Ex. B, p. 7.) The original IS/MND also failed to recognize at all this potential significant impact of the Project. However, as Dr. Smallwood points out, "this level of mortality would qualify as a significant, unmitigated impact." (Ex. B,p. 7.) Because a fair argument exists that the Project may have a significant impact on wildlife in the vicinity as a result of vehicle-wildlife collisions, an EIR must be prepared to assess this impact and identify appropriate mitigation. F. The RIS/MND fails to adequately address the Project's potential cumulative impacts on wildlife. The RIS/MND ignores Dr. Smallwood's comments regarding cumulative impacts on wildlife from the Project. (Ex. B, p. 7.) Dr. Smallwood's comments argue that the IS/MND and RIS/MND both fail to adequately analyze the cumulative impacts to wildlife from the Project by applying"a false CEQA standard for determining whether the project would contribute cumulatively to impacts to wildlife." (Ex. B,p. 7.) However, the RIS/MND's implied standard is not the standard of cumulative effects required under CEQA. The IS/MND also misrepresented the standard and failed to perform an appropriate analysis. An EIR must be prepared to include an adequate, serious analysis of the Project's cumulative impacts on wildlife. G. The pre-construction and burrowing owl surveys identified in the RIS/MND are not sufficient to address potential impacts to birds and bats that may be present at the site. Dr. Smallwood has reviewed the proposed wildlife impact mitigations identified in the RIS/MND related to pre-construction surveys for nesting birds and roosting bats (i.e. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and BIO-3), and burrowing owl surveys (i.e. Mitigation Measure BIO-2). (Ex. B, p. 7.)Although Dr. Smallwood agrees with the need for burrowing owls surveys and pre- construction surveys for birds and bats at the Project site; he notes that burrowing owl surveys and pre-construction surveys will come too late either to disclose the Project's anticipated impacts or to fully mitigate impacts to birds, including burrowing owls, and bats. (Ex. B,p. 7.) As Dr. Smallwood explains: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 The RIS/MND splits the original mitigation measure BIO-1 into two measures, BIO-1 and BIO-3, but doing so did not address any of the issues I raised in my comment letter of 26 September 2021. Whereas I concur these preconstruction surveys should be performed, I again point out that only small fractions of the surveys' targets would be found and salvaged before the site's habitat is destroyed. The habitat of bats and birds would be permanently destroyed, thereby decreasing the numerical capacities of birds and bats in the area. Habitat elsewhere is already occupied, and would be incapable of absorbing birds and bats displaced from this project. (Ex. B,p. 7.) In discussing Mitigation Measure BIO-2 regarding burrowing owl surveys, Dr. Smallwood states that he: ...concur[s] with the implementation of the CDFW (2012) survey guidelines,but this needs to happen prior to the circulation of an EIR. The surveys need to inform the public and the decision-makers of the project's potential impacts to burrowing owls and whether and to what degree those impacts can be mitigated. (Ex. B,p. 7.) By failing to determine the actual baseline of bird's and bat's reliance on the site for roosting, nesting, and foraging and instead waiting within sixty days prior to the start of construction to determine what roosts, nests, birds, and bats may suffer impacts from the Project, the RIS/MND fails to evaluate and mitigate the Project's potential significant impacts to nesting birds and bats. Furthermore, burrowing owl surveys need to be conducted prior to construction and included and circulated in EIR. Dr. Smallwood recommends that detection surveys be implemented for the Project before pre-construction surveys are performed. (Ex. B, pp. 5-6.) In addition to detection surveys and pre-construction surveys being performed, an EIR should be prepared detailing how the results of pre-construction surveys will be reported, while burrowing owl surveys should be performed prior to and circulated in that EIR. (Ex. B,p. 7.) III. The RIS/MND Relied on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project Emissions and Thus Failed to Adequately Analyze the Project's Air Quality Impacts. The RIS/MND for the Project relies on emissions calculated from CalEEMod.2016.3.2. (RIS/MND, pp. 4-9; Ex. C,pp. 1-2.) This model relies on recommended default values, or on site-specific information related to a number of factors. When more specific project information is known, the user may change the default values and input project-specific values, but CEQA requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. The model is used to generate a project's construction and operational emissions. SWAPE reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files and found that the values input into the model were inconsistent with information Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 provided in the RIS/MND, resulting in an underestimation of the Project's emissions. (Ex. C, p. 2.) SWAPE's expert comments and curriculum vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit C. The particular errors identified by SWAPE in the RIS/MND include the following: 1. Unsubstantiated Reduction to Residential Land Use Size. (Ex. C, pp. 2-3.) 2. Underestimated Parking Land Use Size. (Ex. C,pp. 3-4.) 3. Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors. (Ex. C, pp. 4-5.) 4. Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values. (Ex. C,pp. 5-6.) 5. Underestimated Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix Percentages. (Ex. C,pp. 6-8.) 6. Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates. (Ex. C,pp. 8-9.) 7. Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values. (Ex. C, pp. 9- 10.) 8. Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Final Mitigation. (Ex. C,pp. 10-12.) 9. Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures. (Ex. C,pp. 12-14.) Because the RIS/MND uses incorrect estimates for emissions, its air quality analysis and GHG emissions analysis cannot be relied upon to determine the Project's emissions. These errors should be corrected in a subsequent CEQA document prior to approval of the Project. IV. The RIS/MND Fails to Adequately Evaluate Health Risks from Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions. One of the primary emissions of concern regarding health effects for land development projects is diesel particulate matter("DPM"), which can be released during Project construction and operation. DPM consists of fine particles with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers including a subgroup of ultrafine particles (with a diameter less than 0.1 micrometers). Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gasses and cancer-causing substances. Exposure to DPM is a recognized health hazard,particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. According to the California Air Resources Board ("CARB"), DPM exposure may lead to the following adverse health effects: aggravated asthma; chronic bronchitis; increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations; decreased lung function in children; lung cancer; and premature deaths for those with heart or lung disease. The RIS/MND concludes that the proposed Project would have a less-than-significant health risk impact without conducting a proper quantified operational health risk assessment ("HRA"). (Ex. C,pp. 14-17.) Specifically, regarding potential health risk impacts associated with Project operation, the RIS/MND's justification is that"operation of the proposed Project would not produce emissions capable of resulting in substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations"because the Project"does not involve large boilers, generators, or any other Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 equipment or facilities that would warrant special permitting under SCAQMD regulations." (RIS/MND, p. 4-15.) However, SWAPE's review of the RIS/MND and its evaluation of potential health risk impacts for the Project found that the RIS/MND incorrectly concludes that the Project would have a less-than-significant health risk impact on nearby receptors, and completely failed to conduct a quantified operational HRA. (Ex. C, pp. 14-17.) SWAPE concluded that the RIS/MND's evaluation of the Project's potential health impacts, as well as the less-than- significant health impact conclusion, is incorrect for several reasons. (Ex. C,pp. 15-17.) First, the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA fails to account for the third trimester of pregnancy or infant receptors, as required by OEHHA guidance. (Ex. C, p. 15 [citing"Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf,] p. 2-5.) By not accounting for the first two age groups, the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA is not "protective of children." (Id.) In addition, SWAPE states that"because parameters for child and adult receptors are less than the parameters for the third trimester of pregnancy and infant receptors, such as Age Sensitivity Factors ("ASFs"), the RIS/MND's calculated carcinogenic risks are underestimated. (Ex. C,p. 15.) Second, the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA utilizes an incorrect Fraction of Time At Home ("FAH") value of 0.72 for the child receptor. (Ex. C, pp. 15-16 [citing RIS/MND, p. 4- 15, Table 4.3-4].) In accordance with SCAQMD guidance, the HRA should have used a FAH of 1 for the child receptor. (Ex. C, p. 16.) Thus, in utilizing an incorrect FAH value, the RIS/MND's construction HRA underestimates the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction. (Ex. C,p. 16.) Third, by failing to prepare a quantified operational HRA, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions that the Project would generate to the adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions. (Ex. C, p. 16.) SWAPE identifies potential emissions from both the exhaust stacks of construction equipment and daily vehicle trips. (Ex. C,p. 16 [citing RIS/MND, p. 4-10].) Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect toxic air contaminants ("TACs") emissions to potential health risks to nearby sensitive receptors, the Project fails to meet the CEQA requirement that projects correlate increases in project-generated emissions to adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions. (Ex. C, p. 16; see also, Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Ca1.5th 502, 510.) Fourth, the RIS/MND's conclusion is also inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Health Hazard Assessment's ("OEHHA")most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015. (See, "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.) OEHHA recommends Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 that projects lasting at least 2 months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors, a time period which this Project easily exceeds. (Ex. C,p. 16.) The OEHHA document also recommends that if a project is expected to last over 6 months, the exposure should be evaluated throughout the project using a 30-year exposure duration to estimate individual cancer risks. (Ex. C, p. 16.)Based on its extensive experience, SWAPE reasonably assumes that the Project will last at least 30 years, and therefore recommends that health risk impacts from the project be evaluated. (Ex. C, p. 16.) An EIR is therefore required to analyze these impacts. (Ex. C, p. 16.) Fourth, by claiming a less-than-significant impact without evaluating the combined lifetime cancer risk to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction and operation together, SWAPE found that the RIS/MND fails to compare the excess health risk impact to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million. (Ex. C,p. 17.) Thus, in accordance with the most relevant guidance, an updated assessment of the health risk posed to nearby existing receptors from Project construction and operation should be conducted. V. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May have a Significant Health Risk Impact. Correcting the above errors, SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. (Ex. C., pp. 17-20.) SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from Project construction. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. SWAPE applied a sensitive receptor distance of 100 meters and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance utilizing age sensitivity factors. (Ex. C.,pp. 17-20.) SWAPE found that the excess lifetime cancer risk over the course of a Project operation of 30 years is approximately 89.59 in one million. (Ex. C., pp. 19-20.) The risks to lifetime residents appreciably exceed SCAQMD's threshold of 10 in one million. (Ex. C.,pp. 17-19.) SWAPE's analysis constitutes substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant health impact as a result of diesel particulate emissions. A health risk assessment must be prepared disclosing the health risk impacts from toxic air contaminants. VI. The IS/MND Failed to Adequately Analyze Greenhouse Gas Impacts and Thus the Project May Result in Significant Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The RIS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions of 2,935.3 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year("MT CO2e/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year. (RIS/MND, p. 4-37, Table 4.8-1.) Furthermore, the RIS/MND relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the San Bernardino Regional GHG Reduction Plan, and the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan ("CAP") in order to conclude that the Project would result in a less- Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 than-significant GHG impact. (RIS/MND,pp. 4-37-4-39. However, SWAPE concludes that the RIS/MND's GHG analysis, as well as its subsequent less-than-significant conclusion, is incorrect for several reasons. (Ex. C, pp. 20-23.) First, as SWAPE points out, the RIS/MND's GHG analysis relies upon a flawed air model, as discussed above. (Ex. C,p. 21.) As a result, GHG emissions are underestimated and the RIS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Second, the RIS/MND utilizes an outdated GHG threshold. SWAPE notes that when compared to the correct quantitative threshold, the Project's GHG impacts are demonstrably significant. (Ex. C,p. 21.) Third and Fourth, SWAPE's updated analysis indicates a potential significant impact in GHG emissions. (Ex. C,pp. 21-23.) As such, SWAPE recommends that an updated GHG analysis using the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target should be prepared in an EIR and additional mitigation should be incorporated accordingly,per CEQA Guidelines, to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less-than-significant levels. (Ex. C,pp. 21-23.) SWAPE's analysis demonstrated a potentially significant health risk impact from the project that necessitates mitigation, and it proposes that the project design features that are incorrectly applied as mitigation measures by the model be implemented formally as mitigation measures in order to adequately reduce construction and operational emissions. To reduce the Project's emissions, SWAPE also recommends consideration of SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR's Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-AQ-1") and Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-GHG-1"). (Ex. C.,pp. 23-29.) In addition to implementing these measures, an EIR should be included with updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analysis. VII. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have Significant Noise Impact. Review of the proposed Project and relevant appendices regarding the Project's noise impacts from construction activities provides substantial evidence that the RIS/MND improperly analyzed construction noise levels and failed to adequately mitigate significant construction noise impacts. (See, Ex. D,pp. 30-31.) Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Supplemental Comments on Recirculated IS/MND April 13, 2022 Page 3 of 31 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the RIS/MND for the Project should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, ,a-/27,(-6; Victoria Ann Yundt LOZEAU DRURY LLP EXHIBIT A EE INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING :I I 1448 Pine Street,Suite 103 San Francisco,California 94109 Telephone:(415)567-7700 E-mail: offermann@IEE-SF.com http://www.iee-sf.com Date: September 24, 2021 To: Victoria A. Yundt Lozeau l Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, California 94612 From: Francis J. Offermann PE CIH Subject: Indoor Air Quality: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (IEE File Reference: P-4499) Pages: 19 Indoor Air Quality Impacts Indoor air quality(IAQ)directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants,and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a well- recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014). Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors with the majority of this time spent at home(EPA, 2011). Some segments of the population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously.Additionally,an increasing number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek. Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments. The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain and release a variety of pollutants to air (Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson, 2011). With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants. Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Impact. In the California New Home Study (CNHS) of 108 new homes in California (Offermann, 2009), 25 air contaminants were measured, and formaldehyde was identified as the indoor air contaminant with the highest cancer risk as determined by the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a),No Significant Risk Levels (NSRL) for carcinogens. The NSRL is the daily intake level calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000 (i.e., ten in one million cancer risk) and for formaldehyde is 40 µg/day. The NSRL concentration of formaldehyde that represents a daily dose of 40 µg is 2 µg/m3, assuming a continuous 24-hour exposure, a total daily inhaled air volume of 20 m3, and 100% absorption by the respiratory system. All of the CNHS homes exceeded this NSRL concentration of 2 1..ig/m3. The median indoor formaldehyde concentration was 36 lug/m3, and ranged from 4.8 to 136 µg/m3, which corresponds to a median exceedance of the 2 µg/m3 NSRL concentration of 18 and a range of 2.3 to 68. Therefore, the cancer risk of a resident living in a California home with the median indoor formaldehyde concentration of 36 1..tg/m3, is 180 per million as a result of formaldehyde alone. The CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk is 10 per million, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD,2015). Besides being a human carcinogen, formaldehyde is also a potent eye and respiratory irritant. In the CNHS, many homes exceeded the non-cancer reference exposure levels (RELs) prescribed by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2017b). The percentage of homes exceeding the RELs ranged from 98% for the Chronic REL of 9 µg/m3 to 28% for the Acute REL of 55 µg/m3. The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and 2 of 19 particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry,baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims. In January 2009, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an airborne toxics control measure (ATCM) to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, including hardwood plywood,particleboard,medium density fiberboard,and also furniture and other finished products made with these wood products (California Air Resources Board 2009). While this formaldehyde ATCM has resulted in reduced emissions from composite wood products sold in California, they do not preclude that homes built with composite wood products meeting the CARB ATCM will have indoor formaldehyde concentrations below cancer and non-cancer exposure guidelines. A follow up study to the California New Home Study(CNHS)was conducted in 2016-2018 (Singer et. al., 2019), and found that the median indoor formaldehyde in new homes built after 2009 with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor formaldehyde concentrations,with a median indoor concentrations of 22.4 µg/m3(18.2 ppb) as compared to a median of 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. Unlike in the CNHS study where formaldehyde concentrations were measured with pumped DNPH samplers, the formaldehyde concentrations in the HENGH study were measured with passive samplers, which were estimated to under-measure the true indoor formaldehyde concentrations by approximately 7.5%. Applying this correction to the HENGH indoor formaldehyde concentrations results in a median indoor concentration of 24.1 µg/m3, which is 33% lower than the 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. Thus,while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 33%lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer risk,the median lifetime cancer risk is still 120 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood products. This median lifetime cancer risk is more than 12 times the OEHHA 10 in a million cancer risk threshold(OEHHA, 2017a). With respect to the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, Rancho Cucamonga, CA the buildings consist of residential and commercial spaces. 3 of 19 The residential occupants will potentially have continuous exposure(e.g.24 hours per day, 52 weeks per year). These exposures are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in residential construction. Because these residences will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor residential formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 24.1 µg/m3 (Singer et. al., 2020) Assuming that the residential occupants inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 482 µg/day for continuous exposure in the residences. This exposure represents a cancer risk of 120 per million, which is more than 12 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. For occupants that do not have continuous exposure, the cancer risk will be proportionally less but still substantially over the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million(e.g. for 12/hour/day occupancy,more than 6 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million). The employees of the commercial spaces are expected to experience significant indoor exposures(e.g.,40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year). These exposures for employees are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences and hotels. Because the commercial spaces will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 24.1 µg/m3 (Singer et. al., 2020) 4 of 19 Assuming that the employees of commercial spaces work 8 hours per day and inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the formaldehyde dose per work-day at the offices is 161 µg/day. Assuming that these employees work 5 days per week and 50 weeks per year for 45 years (start at age 20 and retire at age 65) the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 70.9 µg/day. This is 1.77 times the NSRL (OEHHA, 2017a) of 40 µg/day and represents a cancer risk of 17.7 per million, which exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. This impact should be analyzed in an environmental impact report ("EIR"), and the agency should impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce this impact. Several feasible mitigation measures are discussed below and these and other measures should be analyzed in an EIR. Appendix A, Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations and the CARB Formaldehyde ATCM, provides analyses that show utilization of CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials will not ensure acceptable cancer risks with respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products. Even composite wood products manufactured with CARE certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million. The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. The following describes a method that should be used, prior to construction in the environmental review under CEQA, for determining whether the indoor concentrations resulting from the formaldehyde emissions of specific building materials/furnishings selected exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines. Such a design analyses can be used to identify those materials/furnishings prior to the completion of the City's CEQA review and project approval, that have formaldehyde emission rates that contribute to indoor 5 of 19 concentrations that exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, so that alternative lower emitting materials/furnishings may be selected and/or higher minimum outdoor air ventilation rates can be increased to achieve acceptable indoor concentrations and incorporated as mitigation measures for this project. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment This formaldehyde emissions assessment should be used in the environmental review under CEQA to assess the indoor formaldehyde concentrations from the proposed loading of building materials/furnishings, the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate data for building materials/furnishings, and the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. This assessment allows the applicant (and the City) to determine, before the conclusion of the environmental review process and the building materials/furnishings are specified, purchased,and installed,if the total chemical emissions will exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, and if so, allow for changes in the selection of specific material/furnishings and/or the design minimum outdoor air ventilations rates such that cancer and non-cancer guidelines are not exceeded. 1.) Define Indoor Air Quality Zones. Divide the building into separate indoor air quality zones, (IAQ Zones). IAQ Zones are defined as areas of well-mixed air. Thus, each ventilation system with recirculating air is considered a single zone, and each room or group of rooms where air is not recirculated(e.g. 100%outdoor air)is considered a separate zone.For IAQ Zones with the same construction material/furnishings and design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. (e.g. hotel rooms, apartments, condominiums, etc.) the formaldehyde emission rates need only be assessed for a single IAQ Zone of that type. 2.) Calculate Material/Furnishing Loading. For each IAQ Zone, determine the building material and furnishing loadings(e.g.,m2 of material/m2 floor area,units of furnishings/m2 floor area) from an inventory of all potential indoor formaldehyde sources, including flooring, ceiling tiles, furnishings, finishes, insulation, sealants, adhesives, and any products constructed with composite wood products containing urea-formaldehyde resins (e.g., plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard). 6 of 19 3.) Calculate the Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each building material, calculate the formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) from the product of the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/m2-h) and the area (m2) of material in the IAQ Zone, and from each furnishing (e.g. chairs, desks, etc.) from the unit-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/unit-h) and the number of units in the IAQ Zone. NOTE: As a result of the high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission,2014;USGBC, 2014),most manufacturers of building materials furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers," (CDPH, 2017), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. Most manufacturers of building furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using ANSI/BIFMA M7.1 Standard Test Method for Determining VOC Emissions (BIFMA, 2018), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. CDPH, BIFMA, and other chemical emission rate testing programs,typically certify that a material or furnishing does not create indoor chemical concentrations in excess of the maximum concentrations permitted by their certification.For instance,the CDPH emission rate testing requires that the measured emission rates when input into an office, school, or residential model do not exceed one-half of the OEHHA Chronic Exposure Guidelines (OEHHA, 2017b)for the 35 specific VOCs,including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017). These certifications themselves do not provide the actual area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (i.e., µg/m2-h) of the product, but rather provide data that the formaldehyde emission rates do not exceed the maximum rate allowed for the certification. Thus, for example, the data for a certification of a specific type of flooring may be used to calculate that the area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde is less than 31 µg/m2-h, but not the actual measured specific emission rate, which may be 3, 18, or 30 1.tg/m2-h. These area-specific emission rates determined from the product certifications of CDPH, BIFA, and other certification programs can be used as an initial estimate of the formaldehyde emission rate. 7 of 19 If the actual area-specific emission rates of a building material or furnishing is needed(i.e. the initial emission rates estimates from the product certifications are higher than desired), then that data can be acquired by requesting from the manufacturer the complete chemical emission rate test report. For instance if the complete CDPH emission test report is requested for a CDHP certified product, that report will provide the actual area-specific emission rates for not only the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017), but also all of the cancer and reproductive/developmental chemicals listed in the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), all of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) in the California Air Resources Board Toxic Air Contamination List(CARB, 2011), and the 10 chemicals with the greatest emission rates. Alternatively, a sample of the building material or furnishing can be submitted to a chemical emission rate testing laboratory, such as Berkeley Analytical Laboratory (https://berkelyanalytical.com), to measure the formaldehyde emission rate. 4.) Calculate the Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the total formaldehyde emission rate (i.e. µg/h) from the individual formaldehyde emission rates from each of the building material/furnishings as determined in Step 3. 5.) Calculate the Indoor Formaldehyde Concentration. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) from Equation 1 by dividing the total formaldehyde emission rates (i.e. µg/h) as determined in Step 4, by the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate (m3/h) for the IAQ Zone. Etotal Cln = (Equation 1) Qoa where: Can= indoor formaldehyde concentration(µg/m3) Etotal=total formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) into the IAQ Zone. Qoa= design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone (m3/h) The above Equation 1 is based upon mass balance theory, and is referenced in Section 8 of 19 3.10.2 "Calculation of Estimated Building Concentrations" of the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers", (CDPH, 2017). 6.) Calculate the Indoor Exposure Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Risks. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the cancer and non-cancer health risks from the indoor formaldehyde concentrations determined in Step 5 and as described in the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA, 2015). 7.)Mitigate Indoor Formaldehyde Exposures of exceeding the CEQA Cancer and/or Non- Cancer Health Risks. In each IAQ Zone,provide mitigation for any formaldehyde exposure risk as determined in Step 6, that exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million or the CEQA non-cancer Hazard Quotient of 1.0. Provide the source and/or ventilation mitigation required in all IAQ Zones to reduce the health risks of the chemical exposures below the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. Source mitigation for formaldehyde may include: 1.) reducing the amount materials and/or furnishings that emit formaldehyde 2.) substituting a different material with a lower area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde Ventilation mitigation for formaldehyde emitted from building materials and/or furnishings may include: 1.) increasing the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone. NOTE: Mitigating the formaldehyde emissions through use of less material/furnishings,or use of lower emitting materials/furnishings,is the preferred mitigation option,as mitigation with increased outdoor air ventilation increases initial and operating costs associated with the heating/cooling systems. 9 of 19 Further, we are not asking that the builder"speculate" on what and how much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers," (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier above (i.e. Pre- Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Impact. Another important finding of the CNHS, was that the outdoor air ventilation rates in the homes were very low. Outdoor air ventilation is a very important factor influencing the indoor concentrations of air contaminants, as it is the primary removal mechanism of all indoor air generated contaminants. Lower outdoor air exchange rates cause indoor generated air contaminants to accumulate to higher indoor air concentrations. Many homeowners rarely open their windows or doors for ventilation as a result of their concerns for security/safety, noise, dust, and odor concerns (Price, 2007). In the CNHS field study, 32%of the homes did not use their windows during the 24-hour Test Day, and 15% of the homes did not use their windows during the entire preceding week. Most of the homes with no window usage were homes in the winter field session. Thus, a substantial percentage of homeowners never open their windows, especially in the winter season. The median 24-hour measurement was 0.26 air changes per hour(ach),with a range of 0.09 ach to 5.3 ach. A total of 67% of the homes had outdoor air exchange rates below the minimum California Building Code(2001)requirement of 0.35 ach. Thus,the relatively tight envelope construction, combined with the fact that many people never open their windows for ventilation, results in homes with low outdoor air exchange rates and higher indoor air contaminant concentrations. The Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project,Rancho Cucamonga,CA is close to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g., I-15, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, etc.), and thus the Project site is likely a sound impacted site. 10 of 19 According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM,2021)the existing ambient noise levels in Table 4.13-1,range from 52.5 to 70.8 dBA Leg. There were no modeled future noise levels in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM, 2021). An acoustic study of the existing and projected future noise levels needs to be conducted to understand the ambient noise levels, Lan, and prepare the necessary project mitigation. We note that Project's close proximity to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g., I-15, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, etc.) make this Project site a significantly sound impacted site. As a result of the high outdoor noise levels, the current project will require a mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation to allow for a habitable interior environment with closed windows and doors. Such a ventilation system would allow windows and doors to be kept closed at the occupant's discretion to control exterior noise within building interiors. PM2_5 Outdoor Concentrations Impact. An additional impact of the nearby motor vehicle traffic associated with this project, are the outdoor concentrations of PM2.5. According to the Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM, 2021) the Project is located in the South Coast Air Basin,which is a State and Federal non- attainment area for PM2.5. An air quality analyses should to be conducted to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in the outdoor and indoor air that people inhale each day. This air quality analyses needs to consider the cumulative impacts of the project related emissions, existing and projected future emissions from local PM2.5 sources (e.g. stationary sources, motor vehicles, and airport traffic) upon the outdoor air concentrations at the Project site. If the outdoor concentrations are determined to exceed the California and National annual average PM2.5 exceedence concentration of 12 µg/m3, or the National 24-hour average exceedence concentration of 35 µg/m3, then the buildings need to have a mechanical supply of outdoor air that has air filtration with sufficient removal efficiency, such that the indoor 11 of 19 concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles is less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. It is my experience that based on the projected high traffic noise levels, the annual average concentration of PM25 will exceed the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards and warrant installation of high efficiency air filters (i.e. MERV 13 or higher) in all mechanically supplied outdoor air ventilation systems. Indoor Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures The following are recommended mitigation measures to minimize the impacts upon indoor quality: Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Mitigation. Use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde(NAF)resins(CARB, 2009). CARB Phase 2 certified composite wood products, or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins, do not insure indoor formaldehyde concentrations that are below the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Only composite wood products manufactured with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins, such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. Alternatively, conduct the previously described Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Chemical Emissions Assessment,to determine that the combination of formaldehyde emissions from building materials and furnishings do not create indoor formaldehyde concentrations that exceed the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. It is important to note that we are not asking that the builder"speculate" on what and how much composite materials be used,but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and 12 of 19 Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers", (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described above (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Mitigation. Provide each habitable room with a continuous mechanical supply of outdoor air that meets or exceeds the California 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (California Energy Commission, 2015) requirements of the greater of 15 cfm/occupant or 0.15 cfm/ft2 of floor area. Following installation of the system conduct testing and balancing to insure that required amount of outdoor air is entering each habitable room and provide a written report documenting the outdoor airflow rates. Do not use exhaust only mechanical outdoor air systems, use only balanced outdoor air supply and exhaust systems or outdoor air supply only systems. Provide a manual for the occupants or maintenance personnel,that describes the purpose of the mechanical outdoor air system and the operation and maintenance requirements of the system. PM2.5 Outdoor Air Concentration Mitigation. Install air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency (e.g. MERV 13 or higher) to filter the outdoor air entering the mechanical outdoor air supply systems,such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles are less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. Install the air filters in the system such that they are accessible for replacement by the occupants or maintenance personnel. Include in the mechanical outdoor air ventilation system manual instructions on how to replace the air filters and the estimated frequency of replacement. 13 of 19 References AECOM. 2021. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project. BIFA. 2018. BIFMA Product Safety and Performance Standards and Guidelines. www.bifma.org/page/standardsoverview California Air Resources Board. 2009. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Reduce Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. http s://www.arb.c a.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/fro-final.p df California Air Resources Board. 2011. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm California Building Code. 2001. California Code of Regulations, Title 24,Part 2 Volume 1, Appendix Chapter 12, Interior Environment, Division 1, Ventilation, Section 1207: 2001 California Building Code, California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento, CA. California Building Standards Commission (2014). 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx. California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2007-033. Final Report, ARB Contract 03-326. Available at: www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/03-326.pdf. California Energy Commission, 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6. http://www.energy.cag. ov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037- CMF.pdf 14 of 19 CDPH. 2017. Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1. California Depai anent of Public Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx. EPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, Chapter 16 — Activity Factors. Report EPA/600/R-09/052F, September 2011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Hodgson,A. T.,D.Beal,J.E.R.Mcllvaine.2002. Sources of formaldehyde,other aldehydes and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 12: 235-242. OEHHA(Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015.Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. OEHHA(Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2017a. Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels.No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. Available at: http://www.oehha.c a.gov/prop65/pdf/safeharbor081513.pdf OEHHA-Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.2017b.All OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html Offermann, F. J. 2009. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes. California Air Resources Board and California Energy Commission,PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program. Collaborative Report. CEC-500-2009-085. https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/04-310.pdf Offermann,F. J. and A. T. Hodgson. 2011. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes. Proceedings Indoor Air 2011 (12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011), June 5-10, 2011, Austin, TX. 15 of 19 Singer, B.C, Chan, W.R, Kim, Y., Offermann, F.J., and Walker I.S. 2020. Indoor Air Quality in California Homes with Code-Required Mechanical Ventilation. Indoor Air, Vol 30, Issue 5, 885-899. South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD).2015.California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Handbook. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality- analysis-handbook USGBC. 2014. LEED BD+C Homes v4. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C. http://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4 16 of 19 APPENDIX A INDOOR FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS AND THE CARB FORMALDEHYDE ATCM With respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products,the CARB ATCM regulations of formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, do not assure healthful indoor air quality. The following is the stated purpose of the CARB ATCM regulation - The purpose of this airborne toxic control measure is to "reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, and finished goods that contain composite wood products, that are sold, offered for sale, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California". In other words, the CARB ATCM regulations do not"assure healthful indoor air quality", but rather"reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products". Just how much protection do the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products?Definitely some, but certainly the regulations do not"assure healthful indoor air quality"when CARB Phase 2 products are utilized. As shown in the Chan 2019 study of new California homes, the median indoor formaldehyde concentration was of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb), which corresponds to a cancer risk of 112 per million for occupants with continuous exposure, which is more than 11 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Another way of looking at how much protection the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products is to calculate the maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. For this calculation I utilized the floor area (2,272 ft2), the ceiling height (8.5 ft), and the number of bedrooms(4)as defined in Appendix B(New Single-Family Residence Scenario) of the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers,Version 1.1,2017,California Department of Public Health, 17 of 19 Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Page s/V OC.aspx. For the outdoor air ventilation rate I used the 2019 Title 24 code required mechanical ventilation rate (ASHRAE 62.2) of 106 cfm (180 m3/h) calculated for this model residence. For the composite wood formaldehyde emission rates I used the CARB ATCM Phase 2 rates. The calculated maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence, without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard(MDF)— 15 ft2 (0.7% of the floor area), or Particle Board—30 ft2 (1.3% of the floor area), or Hardwood Plywood 54 ft2 (2.4% of the floor area), or Thin MDF—46 ft2 (2.0 % of the floor area). For offices and hotels the calculated maximum amount of composite wood product (% of floor area) that can be used without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants,assuming 8 hours/day occupancy,and the California Mechanical Code minimum outdoor air ventilation rates are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF)—3.6 % (offices) and 4.6% (hotel rooms), or Particle Board—7.2 % (offices) and 9.4% (hotel rooms), or Hardwood Plywood— 13 % (offices) and 17% (hotel rooms), or Thin MDF— 11 % (offices) and 14 % (hotel rooms) Clearly the CARB ATCM does not regulate the formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products such that the potentially large areas of these products, such as for flooring, baseboards, interior doors, window and door trims, and kitchen and bathroom cabinetry, could be used without causing indoor formaldehyde concentrations that result in CEQA 18 of 19 cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. Even composite wood products manufactured with CARB certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million. The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. If CARB Phase 2 compliant or ULEF composite wood products are utilized in construction, then the resulting indoor formaldehyde concentrations should be determined in the design phase using the specific amounts of each type of composite wood product, the specific formaldehyde emission rates,and the volume and outdoor air ventilation rates of the indoor spaces, and all feasible mitigation measures employed to reduce this impact (e.g. use less formaldehyde containing composite wood products and/or incorporate mechanical systems capable of higher outdoor air ventilation rates). See the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Alternatively, and perhaps a simpler approach,is to use only composite wood products(e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF)resins. 19 of 19 EXHIBIT B Shawn Smallwood, PhD 3108 Finch Street Davis, CA 95616 Vincent Acuna, Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 25 February 2022 RE: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Dear Mr.Acuna, I write to comment on the Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (RIS/MND) prepared for the proposed Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021), specifically on its analysis of potential impacts to biological resources. I commented on the original IS/MND in my letter of 26 September 2021. Herein I comment on new or revised issues that are raised in the RIS/MND, as well as on issues I raised regarding the IS/MND,but which remain unaddressed in the RIS/MND. ESISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The RIS/MND does a slightly better job of characterizing baseline conditions of the site, but only slightly. The improvement is in the provision of an updated memo from AECOM regarding its reconnaissance-level survey performed on 24 September 2020. The original IS/MND had omitted lists of species detected during this survey. What was not improved, and what warranted an improvement, was a follow-up survey(or multiple surveys) at an appropriate time of day for wildlife. The survey was performed by AECOM in the middle of a hot afternoon — a time during the day when, as biologists are generally well-aware, wildlife activity is at its nadir and species are least likely to be detected. The updated memo reveals that AECOM detected only 8 species of vertebrate wildlife. Of the 8 species detected by AECOM, 3 were not detected by Noriko Smallwood, who surveyed the site on my behalf during the morning of 4 September 2021 (Table 1). That AECOM found only 8 species at the same site where Noriko Smallwood found 24 goes to my point that AECOM's survey was performed at an inappropriate time of day for its stated purpose "to determine the potential for sensitive biological resources to occur within the biological survey area."Noriko found 3 times the number of species that AECOM found. The survey that is supposed to inform of the existing environmental setting, which itself is supposed to serve as the baseline against which potential impacts are analyzed, fails to do so. Neither the original IS/MND nor the RIS/MND should be treating the AECOM survey results as representative of existing environmental conditions. 1 Table 1. Species of wildlife detected by AECOM during the afternoon of 24 September 2020 and by Noriko Smallwood (NS) who surveyed from o6:54 to 08:42 hours on 4 September 2021 at the proposed Project site. Species Scientific name Status AECOM NS Great blue heron Ardea herodius + Gull Laridae + Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooperii WL, BOP + American kestrel Falco sparverius BOP + Mourning dove Zenaida macroura + Eurasian collared-dove Streptopelia decaocto Non-native + Rock pigeon Columba livia Non-native + Anna's hummingbird Calypte anna + White-throated swift Aeronautes saxatalis + Say's phoebe Sayornis saya + Black phoebe Sayornis nigricans + + Cassin's kingbird Tyrannus vociferans + European starling Sturnus vulgaris Non-native + California scrub jay Aphelocoma californica + Common raven Corvus corax + American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos + Tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor + Barn swallow Hirundo rustica + Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos + + Bushtit Psaltiparus minimus + House sparrow Passer domesticus Non-native + House finch Carpodacus mexicanus + + Lesser goldfinch Carduelis psaltria + + California ground squirrel Otospermophilus + + beecheyi Botta's pocket gopher Thomomys bottae + Side-blotched lizard Uta stansburiana + Western fence lizard Sceloperus occidentalis + The results of the AECOM survey combined with those of Noriko's survey brings the tally of vertebrate wildlife species detections to 27. The RIS/MND ignores Noriko's survey results and what they mean to the characterization of the existing environmental setting and the likelihoods of special-status species occurrences. The RIS/MND misleadingly reports, "no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed within the biological survey area during the reconnaissance field survey." This reporting is misleading not only because it ignores the special-status species that Noriko detected, but also attempts to pass off the AECOM survey effort as sufficient for detecting special- status species. It was not. No reconnaissance-level survey effort is capable of detecting all the species that use a site, including those that use it seasons and times of day other than when the reconnaissance-level survey was performed. Furthermore, no biologist is perfect at detecting the species of wildlife that are available to be detected at the time of 2 the survey. For these reasons, to characterize the wildlife community at a site, multiple methods and multiple surveys are needed (see below). As part of my research, I completed a much larger survey effort across 167 km2 of annual grasslands of the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, where from 2015 through 2019 I performed 721 i-hour visual-scan surveys, or 721 hours of surveys, at 46 stations. I used binoculars and otherwise the methods were the same as the methods I use for surveys at proposed project sites. At each of the 46 survey stations, I tallied new species detected with each sequential survey at that station, and then related the cumulative species detected to the hours (number of surveys, as each survey lasted 1 hour) used to accumulate my counts of species detected. I used combined quadratic and simplex methods of estimation in Statistica to estimate least-squares,best-fit nonlinear models of cumulative species detected regressed on hours of survey(number of surveys) at the station: R = 1,/a+bx(Hours)c ,where R represented cumulative species richness detected. The coefficients of determination, r2, of the models ranged o.88 to 1.00,with a mean of 0.97(95% CI: 0.96, 0.98); or in other words, the models were excellent fits to the data. I projected the predictions of each model to thousands of hours to find predicted asymptotes of wildlife species richness. The mean model-predicted asymptote of species richness was 57 after 11,857 hours of visual-scan surveys among the 46 stations. I also averaged model predictions of species richness at each incremental increase of number of surveys, i.e., number of hours (Figure 1). On average I detected 9 species over the first 1.8 hours of surveys in the Altamont Pass (1.8 hours to match the number of hours Noriko surveyed at the project site),which composed 15.8 % of the total predicted species I would detect with a much larger survey effort. Given the example illustrated in Figure 1, the 24 species Noriko detected after her 1.8 hours of survey at the project site likely represented 15.8% of the species to be detected after many more visual-scan surveys over another year or longer. With many more repeat surveys through the year, Noriko would likely detect 24/0.158 = 152 species of vertebrate wildlife at the site. The site is predicted to host 152 species of vertebrate wildlife over the course of the average year,which is nearly 20 times the number implied in the RIS/MND. Again, however, my prediction of 152 species of vertebrate wildlife is derived from visual-scan surveys during the daytime, and would not detect nocturnal mammals. The true number of species composing the wildlife community of the site must be larger. A reconnaissance-level survey should serve only as a starting point toward characterization of a site's wildlife community,but it certainly cannot alone inform of the inventory of species that use the site. This later point is especially true of a survey performed during the middle of a hot afternoon. 3 Figure 1. Mean (95%CI) 50 predicted wildlife species richness, R, as a nonlinear function of hour-long survey increments across 40 _=— 46 visual-scan survey _ ,•��' stations across the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area,Alameda U 30and Contra Costa • Counties, 2015-2019. 20 - 9- 00 1015 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative number of surveys (hours) There is no question that a larger survey effort would result in a longer list of species documented to use the project site, thereby changing our understanding of the current environmental setting. But still unknown are which species have yet to be detected, how many of the yet-to-be-detected species are special-status species, and how many are listed species. The likelihood of detecting special-status species is typically lower than that of more common species. This difference can be explained by the fact that special- status species tend to be rarer and thus less detectable than common species. Special- status species also tend to be more cryptic, fossorial, or active during nocturnal periods when reconnaissance surveys are not performed. Another useful relationship from careful recording of species detections and subsequent comparative analysis is the probability of detection of listed species as a function of an increasing number of vertebrate wildlife species detected (Figure 2). (Note that listed species number fewer than special-status species,which are inclusive of listed species.Also note that I include California Fully Protected species and federal Candidate species as listed species.) 4 Figure 2. Probability 1 0 of detecting >_i e-2.621955+0.068131N - Candidate, Threatened -ciQ P = 1 + e-2.621955+0.068131N - - o or Endangered Species CD -- of wildlife listed under m m 0.8 — g5% CI — oo California or federal 2 a) - 0 Endangered Species a 152 site visits — o Acts, based on survey _ • outcomes logit- m w 0.6 - — ••.• - regressed on the min .•' — -- number of wildlife m 0 — •. _— CD _-- species I detected during m m 0 •4 - - •0 —— 152 site visits in • MS — ,•' __ California. The dashed o 2 _ ,.•4 _— vertical line represents — ; __— s.• _— •the number of species Po detected by AECOM and o l 0 2 1 _v%. �•` the solid vertical line a 2 •"'' __ c - - represents the number U 0.0 Noriko Smallwood 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 detected. Number of species detected As was demonstrated in Figures 1 and 2, the number of species detected is largely a function of survey effort. Greater survey effort also increases the likelihood that listed species will be detected (which is the first tenet of detection surveys for special-status species). Based on the outcomes of 152 previous surveys that I performed at sites of proposed projects, Noriko Smallwood's survey effort at the project site carried a 28% chance of detecting a listed species, whereas the survey effort of AECOM resulted in the detections of many fewer species and therefore carried an ii% chance of detecting a listed species. To stand a reasonable chance of detecting a listed species,AECOM would have needed to perform another 9 of the surveys it completed on 21 September 2020. I have no doubt that listed species use the site, but serious efforts to detect them must be made before determining listed species are absent. No reconnaissance-level survey is capable of detecting enough of the wildlife species that occur at a site to realistically characterize the site's wildlife community. This context bears on my earlier and current comments regarding potential project impacts to biological resources. BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT The RIS/MND revises the City's treatment of burrowing owls by considering the species potentially present. However,while acknowledging potential presence of burrowing owls, the RIS/MND also downplays their occurrence likelihood by asserting that the site does not provide high quality habitat. Unless the City measured productivity of burrowing owls on site and compared productivity to burrowing owls at other sites, the City has no means of assessing habitat quality. Habitat quality carries a specific meaning in the field of wildlife biology, and that meaning goes to productivity, which is 5 measured by nest success, fecundity, number of chicks emerged from the burrow, number of chicks surviving to fledging, and even the number of chicks surviving to reproduce. None of these measurements were made at the site, so no conclusion of habitat quality can be taken as credible. The questions that are in most need of answers before the CEQA review is certified is whether the site provides habitat to burrowing owls, how many burrowing owls use the site, and for what purpose(s) do burrowing owls use the site. To answer these questions, the detection surveys recommended by CDFW (2012) need to be implemented in full, and they need to be completed prior to the public circulation of an EIR because one of the main objectives of the surveys is to inform the public and decision-makers of potential impacts and whether and to what degree they can be mitigated. The RIS/MND continues to imply that lack of CNDDB records support the RIS/MND determinations of species' absences from the site. This is a misapplication of CNDDB. CNDDB can be helpful for confirming occurrences of special-status species where they have been reported,but it cannot be relied upon for determining absences of species. CNDDB relies on volunteer reporting, and is limited in its spatial coverage by the access of biologists to private properties. The findings reported to CNDDB are not from any sort of randomized or systematic sampling across California, nor does CNDDB collect reports of negative findings. Another limitation of CNDDB is its focus on special-status species. Most members of any of California's wildlife communities are not reported to CNDDB,because CNDDB is not interested in them and Scientific Collecting Permits do not require reporting of them. This means that any species recently designated with special status will not be as well represented in CNDDB as are other species that were assigned special status decades ago. The limitations of CNDDB are well-known, and summarized by CDFW in a warning presented on its CNDDB web site (https:// wildlife.ca .gov/Data/CNDDB/ Maps-and-Data): "We work very hard to keep the CNDDB and the Spotted Owl Database as current and up-to-date as possible given our capabilities and resources. However, we cannot and do not portray the CNDDB as an exhaustive and comprehensive inventory of all rare species and natural communities statewide.Field verification for the presence or absence of sensitive species will always be an important obligation of our customers..." A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately assess occurrence likelihoods of special-status species as part of the characterization of the current environmental setting. Habitat Loss The RIS/MND ignores my comments regarding habitat loss to breeding birds. Based on simple assumptions and simple calculations, I predicted the project would deny Californians of 116 birds per year. This loss would qualify as a significant, unmitigated impact. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze the impacts of habitat loss to birds and other wildlife. Wildlife Movement The RIS/MND ignores my comments regarding wildlife movement and how, in its analysis, the RIS/MND applies a false CEQA standard centered on whether the site is 6 part of a wildlife movement corridor. The CEQA standard does not rely on whether the site is part of a corridor. BIRD-WINDOW COLLISION MORTALITY The RIS/MND ignores my comments regarding bird-window collision mortality, which I predicted would be 234 bird deaths per year (95% CI: 139-329). This level of mortality would qualify as a significant, unmitigated impact. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze the impacts of bird-window collisions. TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON WILDLIFE The RIS/MND ignores my comments regarding mortality caused by project-generated traffic. I predicted the project's traffic would cause 3,276 wildlife fatalities per year. This level of mortality would qualify as a significant, unmitigated impact. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze the impacts of vehicle-wildlife collisions. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The RIS/MND ignores my comments regarding cumulative impacts, and how the RIS/MND applies a false CEQA standard for determining whether the project would contribute cumulatively to impacts to wildlife. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze potential cumulative impacts MITIGATION BIO-i and BIO-3: Preconstruction survey for roosting bats and nesting birds The RIS/MND splits the original mitigation measure BIO-1 into two measures, BIO-1 and BIO-3,but doing so did not address any of the issues I raised in my comment letter of 26 September 2021. Whereas I concur these preconstruction surveys should be performed, I again point out that only small fractions of the surveys' targets would be found and salvaged before the site's habitat is destroyed. The habitat of bats and birds would be permanently destroyed, thereby decreasing the numerical capacities of birds and bats in the area. Habitat elsewhere is already occupied, and would be incapable of absorbing birds and bats displaced from this project. BIO-2: Burrowing owl surveys I concur with the implementation of the CDFW(2012) survey guidelines,but this needs to happen prior to the circulation of an EIR. The surveys need to inform the public and the decision-makers of the project's potential impacts to burrowing owls and whether and to what degree those impacts can be mitigated. 7 Thank you for your attention, Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. REFERENCES CITED CDFW(California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Sacramento, California. 8 EXHIBIT C SWAP E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street,Suite 201 Santa Monica,CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G,C.Hg. (949)887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310)795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com March 16, 2022 Victoria Yundt Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94618 Subject: Comments on the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Dear Ms. Yundt, We have reviewed the February 2022 Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ("RIS/MND")for the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City").The Project proposes to construct a 260-unit apartment building, 3,339-square feet ("SF") of commercial space, and 5,500-SF of indoor amenity space, as well as a total of 528 parking spaces, on the 5.2-acre site. Our review concludes that the RIS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts.As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report("EIR") should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the surrounding environment. Air Quality Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The RIS/MND's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2 (p. 4-9).1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data,total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known,the user can change the default values and input 1"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model,the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated.These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected. When reviewing the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the Updated Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health Risk Assessment Modeling Outputs as Appendix K to the RIS/MND, respectively, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the RIS/MND.As a result,the Project's construction and operational emissions are underestimated.Thus, an EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality. Unsubstantiated Reduction to Residential Land Use Size According to the RIS/MND,the Project proposes to construct "259 apartment units, ranging from 715 square feet to 1,367 square feet" (p. 1-14). Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the correct number of residential units (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 4, 58, 112). Land Uses I Size I Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area I Population General Office Building 5.54 1000s41 0.13 5,537.00 I 0 r Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 265.00 Space I- 0.00 89,810.OD i 0 i I- I i Parking Lot 20505 Space 1_BO 64,690 OD i 0 i i I- I f City Park 0.33 Acre i 0.33 14,375.0D I 0 I- Recreational Swimming Pool • 3.58 1000sgfl 0.00 3,572 00 i 0 I 3 1 1 r Apartments Mid Rise 259 00 Dwelling Unit 00 225,079 00 i 785 f Condofiownhouse 1.00 • Dwelling Unit i 0.00 1,57000 i 3 -- -- Strip p Mall 244 1000sgfl 0.00 27€00 0 However,further review demonstrates that the square footage associated with the residential land use floor surface area was reduced from the default value of 259,000-to 225,079-SF (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 10, 64, 118). Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet +I 259,000.00 225,079.00 As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.2 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table, the justification provided for this change is: "Apartments: 226,649 SF (Includes Live/Work Unit)" (Appendix K, pp. 4, 58, 112). 2"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 2 However,this justification is insufficient for two reasons. First,the RIS/MND fails to explicitly state the total square footage of the residential land use whatsoever. As such, we cannot verify that a floor surface area of 225,079-SF is accurate. Second, as previously stated,the RIS/MND indicates that the 259 apartment units will range from 715-SF to 1,367-SF (p. 1-13).Thus,the total square footage of the residential space will range from 185,185-SF3 to 354,053-SF.4 As such, in order to conduct the most conservative analysis,the model should have included 354,053-SF of floor surface area. This unsubstantiated reduction presents an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that go into the model's calculations.The square footage of a land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts).5 Thus, by including an unsubstantiated reduction to the residential floor surface area, the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related and operational emissions, and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Underestimated Parking Land Use Size According to the RIS/MND: "The proposed Project would provide 528 total parking spaces: 200 surface parking spaces and 328 garage parking spaces, including guest parking spaces" (p. 1-15). However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes only 265 spaces of"Enclosed Parking with Elevator" (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 4, 58, 112). Land Uses I Size I Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area I Population General Office Building 5.54 1000sgfl i 0.13 5,537.00 1 0 f Enclosed Parking with Elevator 265.00 Space 0.00 89,810.00 1 I I I Parking Lot 20000 Space 1.80 64,690.OD 0 City Park 0.33 Acre i 0.33 14,375.00 I 0 F Recreational Swimming Pool 3.58 1000sgfl 000 3572 00 i 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259 a0 Dwelling Unit 300 225,079 00 i 785 r Condofiawnhouse 1.00 Dwelling Unit 0.00 1,57600 I 3 Strip Mall 244 1000sgfl 0.00 2,43600 0 As demonstrated above, while the model correctly includes 200 surface parking spaces, the number of garage parking spaces is underestimated by 63 spaces.'Additionally, further review demonstrates that floor surface areas for both the "Enclosed Parking with Elevator" and "Parking Lot" land uses were 3 Calculated: 715-SF * 259 units= 185,185-SF total. Calculated: 1,367-SF * 259 units=354,053-SF total. 5"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.29. 'Calculated: 328 proposed garage parking spaces—265 modeled garage parking spaces=63 underestimation. 3 reduced from the default value of 106,000-to 89,810-SF and 80,000-SF to 64,690-SF, respectively(see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 10, 64, 118). Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblLandUse — LandUseSquareFeet 106,000.0° — 89,81°.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 80,0°0.00 64,69°.00 As you can see in the excerpt above, the garage and surface parking land use sizes were manually reduced by 16,190-SF and 15,310-SF, respectively.''8 As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.'According to the "User Entered Comments& Non-Default Data"table, the justification provided for these changes is: "Sub. Parking: 89,810 SF Sfc. Parking: 64,690 SF" (Appendix K, pp. 5, 59, 113). However,the RIS/MND fails to mention the square footage of the proposed garage or surface parking land uses whatsoever. As such,we cannot verify the revised parking land use sizes. These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as the square footage of parking land uses is used for certain calculations such as determining the area to be painted and stripped (i.e.,VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume to be ventilated (i.e., energy impacts).10 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the square feet of the proposed parking land uses,the model underestimates the Project's emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default architectural and area coating emission factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 6, 60, 114). Table Name Column Name I Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior • 10100 5100 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 10100 5100 • tblAreaCoating • Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exteriar 100 50 As you can see in the excerpt above, the nonresidential exterior architectural and area coating emission factors were each reduced from the default value of 100-to 50-grams per liter("g/L").As previously 'Calculated: (106,000-SF default"Enclosed Parking with Elevator" land use size)—(89,810-SF revised land use size) = 16,190-SF reduction. 8 Calculated: (80,000-SF default"Parking Lot" land use size)—(64,690-SF revised land use size) = 15,310-SF reduction. "CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14. 10"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.29. 4 mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 11According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table, the justification provided for these changes is: "SCAQMD Rule 1113 Compliance for Building Envelope and residential coatings-50 g/L" (Appendix K, pp. 5, 59, 113). However,these changes remain unsupported for two reasons. First,the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to mention the Building Envelope category of paint, and its associated VOC content limit of 50 g/L as required per SCAQMD Rule 1113,whatsoever. Second, the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to explicitly require the Project to use only Building Envelope coatings during construction and operation of the proposed nonresidential land uses whatsoever. As such, we cannot verify that the revised values are accurate. These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the architectural and area coating emission factors to calculate the Project's reactive organic gas/volatile organic compound ("ROG"/"VOC") emissions.12 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the default architectural and area coating emission factors,the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related and operational ROG/VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default gas fireplace values (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 8, 62, 116). Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 4 tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 DOD f — tblFireplaces 4. FireplaceDayYear 25.00 365.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHaurDay 3.00 D.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHaurDay 3_60 6 00 f tblFireplaces FireplaceWaadMass 1,01929 1 DOD + tblFireplaces FireplaceWaadMass 1,019.29 I D.OD tblFireplaces NumberGas 220.15 D.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 0.85 1.00 As you can see in the excerpt above, the model assumes that the Project would include only one gas fireplace. As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults 11"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 12"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.35,41. 5 be justified. 13According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table,the justification provided for these changes is: "No Fireplaces in units per Project Design 1 Outdoor Fireplace Included" (Appendix K, pp. 5, 59, 113). However,this justification is insufficient, as the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to mention or substantiate the exclusion of gas fireplaces from the Project design whatsoever.This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide: "CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site-or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA."14 Here, as the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to provide substantial evidence to support the assumption that no gas fireplace would be included in the Project design, we cannot verify the changes. This potential underestimation presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses the number of gas fireplaces to calculate the Project's area-source operational emissions.15 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the gas fireplace values, the model may underestimate the Project's area-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Underestimated Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix Percentages Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use" model includes several changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix percentages (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 9, 63, 117). 13"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 14"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13-14. is"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.40-41. 6 Table Name Column Name 1 Default Value New Value tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.00 tbl FleetM ix • HHD 0.07 0.00 4 }▪ ---------------- tblFleetMix • LDA 0.56 0.60 tblFleetMix ■ LDA ■ 0.56 0.60 4 }---------------- tblFleetMix • LDT1 0.04 0.06 tblFleetMix ■ LDT1 ■ 0.04 0.06 tblFleetMix • LDT2 0.18 0.19 • tblFleetMix ■ LDT2 ■ 0.18 0.19 4 }---------------- tblFleetMix • LHD1 0.01 0.02 tblFleetMix ■ LHD1 ■ 0.01 0.02 4 tblFleetMix • LHD2 4.7940e-003 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix • LHD2 4.7940e-003 5.0000e-003 4 }▪ ---------------- tblFleetMix • MC? 5.7250e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix ■ MC? ■ 5.7250e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix • MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix ■ MDV ■ 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix • MH 8.3000e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix ■ MH ■ 8.3000e-004 0.00 4 tblFleetMix • MHD 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix • MHD 0.02 0.00 4 tblFleetMix • OBUS 1.3650e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix • OBUS 1.3650e-003 0.00 4 }▪ ---------------- tblFleetMix • SBUS 7.9900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix ■ SBUS ■ 7.9900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix • UBUS 1.4910e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix ■ UBUS ■ 1.4910e-003 0.00 As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.16 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "Residential Trips" (Appendix K, pp. 6, 60, 114). However, these changes remain unsupported, as the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to mention the operational vehicle fleet mix or justify the revised percentages whatsoever. According to the CalEEMod User's Guide: 16"CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 7 "CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site-or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA" (emphasis added).17 Here, as the RIS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised operational vehicle fleet mix percentages,we cannot verify the changes. These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as operational vehicle fleet mix percentages are used by CalEEMod to calculate the Project's operational emissions associated with on-road vehicles.18 Thus, by including unsubstantiated changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix,the model may underestimate the Project's mobile-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates According to the RIS/MND: "It is anticipated that the proposed Project would accommodate approximately 788 future residents, and operational activities would generate approximately 1.6 tons per day of solid waste for residential uses and 154 pounds per day for commercial uses during Project operation" (p. 4-79). As such,the model should have included 584-and 28.1-tons per year("tpy") of solid waste for the Project's proposed residential and commercial land uses.19,2° However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes only 580.32-and 25.45-tpy of solid waste for the proposed residential and commercial land uses, respectively(see excerpts below) (Appendix K, pp. 172-173). 17"CaIEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13-14. 18"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.37. 19 Calculated: 1.6 tons *365 days=584 tpy for the residential land use. 20 Calculated: (154 lbs/2,000) * 365 days=28.1 tpy for the commercial land uses. 8 Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT;yr I Aparl rents Mid • 580.32 117.7997 • 8.9613 • 0.0000 • 29' 8438 Rise r r City Park D i D.0000 1 D.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 i, r r I II , , r 1r--r--T-� �CondoTTownhous. D +I D.0000 . D.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 r •r--r- T-� Enclosed Parking • D +• D.0000 : D.0000- : 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator , a, ` 1 1 General Office5.15 1.0454 • D.0618 • 0.0000 • 2.5899 Building ; 1 -T--T--,. Parking Lot D +: D.0000 . D.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 r r r r +r r •r--r--T- ; Recreational • D +• D.0000 1 D.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool : a, , r r r Strip Mall 20.45 4.1512 • D.2453 • 0.0000 , 10.2643 r ; r Total 122.9963 T.2689 0.0004 304.7181 As you can see in the excerpt above, the residential and commercial solid waste generation rates were underestimated by 3.68-and 2.5-tpy.Thus,the model is underestimated and inconsistent with the information provided in the RIS/MND. These underestimations present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the solid waste generation rates to calculate the Project's operational GHG emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste into landfills.'Thus, by including underestimated solid waste generation rates, the model underestimates the Project's operational GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several changes to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 10, 64, 118). Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value i I tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 76.00 - 15.00 i tblOffRaadEquipment HorsePower 76.00 15.00 4 21"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.46. 9 As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.22 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table,the justification provided for these changes is: "Project Inventory provided by Applicant" (Appendix K, pp. 5, 59, 113). However,the RIS/MND and associated documents fail to mention or justify the revised construction off- road equipment horsepower values whatsoever.This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide: "CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site-or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA" (emphasis added).23 Here, as the RIS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised horsepower values, we cannot verify the changes. These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as CalEEMod uses horsepower values to calculate emissions associated with off-road construction equipment.24 By including unsubstantiated changes to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values,the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Final Mitigation Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model assumes that most of the Project's off-road construction equipment fleet would meet Tier 4 Final emissions standards (see excerpt below) (Appendix K, pp. 7, 61, 115). 22"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 23"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13-14. 24"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p.33. 10 Table Name Column Name Default'Value New Value tIJIConstEquipMiugation • Tier • No Change Tier 4 Final 4 + — tblGonstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation ■ Tier ■ No Change Tier 4 Final 161ConstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final 4 4— tbleonstEquipMitigation ■ Tier ■ No Change Tier 4 Final tIJIConstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblGonstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final 4 tblConstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation ■ Tier ■ No Change Tier 4 Final tbleonstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final LblConstEquipMitigation ■ Tier ■ No Change Tier 4 Final tbiGonstEquipMitigation • Tier No Change Tier 4 Final t IConstEquipMitigation ■ Tier ■ No Change Tier Final i---------------- i As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.25 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table,the justification provided for the inclusion of Tier 4 Final mitigation is: "Best management practices to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 include watering exposed areas thrice daily" (Appendix B, pp. 71). Furthermore, the RIS/MND implements the following Best Management Practice ("BMP"), which would be included as a standard condition of Project approval: "The proposed Project would require the employment of contractor(s) capable of providing an equipment fleet comprising all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment with engines greater than 25 horsepower that meet or exceed the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA)Tier 4 off-road emissions standards.The use of Tier 4 engines is a standard practice for development projects and will be required by the City pursuant to the proposed Project's conditions of approval and in accordance with the General Plan Update EIR (adopted on December 15, 2021)" (p. 1-17). However, the inclusion of Tier 4 Final emissions standards remains unsupported. As demonstrated above, the RIS/MND fails to require the more efficient Tier 4 Final emission standards.The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA") has slowly adopted more stringent standards to lower the emissions from off-road construction equipment. Since 1994,Tier 1,Tier 2, Tier 3,Tier 4 Interim, and Tier 4 Final construction equipment have been phased in over time.Tier 4 Final represents the cleanest 25 "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 2, 9. 11 burning equipment and therefore has the lowest emissions compared to other tiers, including Tier 4 Interim equipment (see excerpt below):26 4aaii ui _995 1936 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2032 2033 2071 2005 2006 .30- 2J]6 2003 2010 2011 2012 .]]3 20_1 .3154 M1ttserwwei 25545050 .1;0.60 5.9/4.1/0.45 5.5/4.5/0.22 3.5]4.1/0.02 50514s 75 3.523.7 022. 3,513.7/002. 5.9 3.7)0.30 790,100 6.= 3.9•3 7 i 0.30 014/ O Ia;25: 030/ 3.. 00_5 3./: 100514,73 • 19;3:;0.22 3.0/3.//022 0015 /7551pe350 • 4.9/2.6 0 L5 0.13;'15. 0.16:0.30. 30.1,900 - 1.11/@9/BS/LIAO 30/2.6;'0.66' t,6;'2fii 0.19 ='.6;0.015 0015 60.hp5750 • Mee. 4/ 2.5 Medunr3 2.6� T` P 0.30.2.E]25'0.07 0.03 ......................... 10/119/ES/CAD LR/2e/215 760harGEN p14/ 51200np 0 50/ 2fi! GFN,11001u 0.30/05012.6I0.07 0.02 S cum derived from Calibers Par Resocrces Board.http:i/nwwarb.ca.gov/mspmg/sraiesel/Oocument3/OH-Roatl olesel Stdsds. a]When ARB and L1EPA standards differ.the standards shown here represent the more slringenl of the two. b]Standards pjven for all sues of Tier 1 engnes ere hfsrocarbons/oxides of nitrogen iNOe0/so rbon monoxide(COVparticulate matter t PHI in grams per bra ke horspower par hour lg0bhp-h0. ch Sle retards giver for all sizes of Tier lard Tier)engines.and Tier 4 engines below 75 horsepower are rlmmelhane hydrocarbons(HMNC]+NOp/CO/PM in glbhp-hr. 4]Standards given for tier 4 engines above 75 horsepower are NHHCr/HOe/CO/PM ing/bhpir. e]Engine families in this power category ma/abematey meet Ter 3 PM standarth4030 gldhp-hr]from 2003 2011 in exchange for introducing final PH standards in 2012 0 The inplemencaton srtedule shown is the three-,ear alternate Nile approach Other schedules ere evadable. g)Certain manufacturers have agreed to comply wier these standards by 2005. nHa Ede, • �e..e rw55 As demonstrated in the figure above,Tier 4 Interim equipment has higher emission levels than Tier 4 Final equipment. Therefore, by modeling construction emissions assuming a full Tier 4 Final equipment fleet,the RIS/MND fails to account for higher emissions that may occur as a result of the use of Tier 4 Interim equipment. Since the RIS/MND fails to specify whether the Project would use Tier 4 Interim or Tier 4 Final equipment, it is incorrect to model emissions assuming that the more efficient Tier 4 Final equipment would be implemented. Until an EIR is prepared requiring Tier 4 Final engines during all phases of construction, and not Tier 4 Interim equipment,the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the following area-related operational mitigation measures (see excerpts below) (Appendix K, pp. 54, 108, 165): 26"San Francisco Clean Construction Ordinance Implementation Guide for San Francisco Public Projects."August 2015,available at:https://www.sfdph.org/dph/files/EHSdocs/AirQuality/San Francisco Clean Construction Ordinance 2015.pdf, p.6 12 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use Low VOC Paint- Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint- Residential Exterior Use Law VOC Paint- Non-Residential Exterior Use only Natural Gas Hearths As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.27 However the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data"table, only provides justification for the inclusion of the area-related operational mitigation measures,which states: "SCAQMD Rule 1113 Compliance for Building Envelope" (Appendix K, pp. 6, 60, 114). However,the inclusion of the above-mentioned operational mitigation measures remains unsupported for three reasons. First,the RIS/MND fails to mention the use of low VOC paints whatsoever.As such, we cannot verify the Project actually intends on implementing the area-related operational mitigation measures. Second, the inclusion of the operational mitigation measures, based on the Project's purported compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsupported.As previously stated, according to the AEP CEQA Portal Topic Paper on mitigation measures: "By definition, mitigation measures are not part of the original project design. Rather, mitigation measures are actions taken by the lead agency to reduce impacts to the environment resulting from the original project design. Mitigation measures are identified by the lead agency after the project has undergone environmental review and are above-and-beyond existing laws, regulations, and requirements that would reduce environmental impacts."28 As you can see in the excerpt above, mitigation measures "are not part of the original project design" and are intended to go "above-and-beyond" existing regulatory requirements. As such,the inclusion of these measures, based on the Project's vague compliance SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsubstantiated. Third,the RIS/MND fails to formally include the above-mentioned design features as Project-level mitigation measures.This is incorrect, as AEP guidance states: "While not "mitigation", a good practice is to include those project design feature(s)that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental 27"CalEEMod User's Guide."California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,available at: https://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1. 28"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP), February 2020,available at:https://cegaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p.5. 13 impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact" (emphasis added).29 As you can see in the excerpt above, design features that are not formally included as mitigation measures in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") may be eliminated from the Project's design altogether.Thus, as the area-related operational measures are not formally included as mitigation measures, we cannot guarantee that they would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. As such,the inclusion of the above-mentioned operational mitigation measures in the model is incorrect. As a result,the model may underestimate the Project's operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The RIS/MND estimates that the carcinogenic risk posed to nearby, existing child and adult sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction would be 2.64 and 0.35 in one million, respectively, neither of which would exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 4-15;Table 4.3-4). Table 4.3-4. Construction Diesel PM Inhalation-Pathway Health Risk Assessment Parameter Description/Units Child Receptor Adult Receptor Maximum Annual Average Concentration[pg/m3] 0.04718 0.04718 [BR/BW] Daily Breathing Rate per Body Weight[Llkg-day] 861 335 A Absorption Fraction 100% 100% EF Exposure Frequency[360 days/365 days] 0.96 0.96 CPF Cancer Potency Factor [mg/kg-day'] 1.1 1.1 ASF Age Sensitivity Factor 3 1 ED Exposure Duration[Years] 2 2 AT Averaging Time[Years] 70 70 FAH Fraction of Time at Home 0.72 0.73 CF Conversion Factor[mg/kg] 1.0 x 10-6 1.0 x 10-6 Carcinogenic Risk(Excess Cancers per Million) 2.64 0.35 SCAQMD Threshold 10 10 Threshold Exceeded? No No Source: TAHA 2021 Regarding the health risk impacts associated with Project operation,the RIS/MND states: "Operation of the proposed Project would not create a new substantial permanent source of air pollutant emissions to the Project area.The proposed Project does not involve large boilers, generators, or any other equipment or facilities that would warrant special permitting under SCAQMD regulations.The operational emissions analysis shown in Table 4.3-2 demonstrates that operation of the proposed Project would not produce emissions capable of resulting in 29"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP), February 2020,available at:https://cegaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p.6. 14 substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations.Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations" (p. 4-15). As demonstrated above,the RIS/MND concludes that the Project would result in a less-than-significant operational health risk impact because the Project's equipment and facilities would not result in significant toxic air contaminant ("TAC") emissions. However,the RIS/MND's evaluation of the Project's potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for five reasons. First,the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA fails to account for the third trimester of pregnancy or infant receptors.According to OEHHA guidance, as discussed in detail below, residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.30 As such, by not accounting for the first two age groups, the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA is not "protective of children."31 Furthermore, because parameters for child and adult receptors are less than the parameters for the third trimester of pregnancy and infant receptors, such as Age Sensitivity Factors ("ASFs"),the RIS/MND's calculated carcinogenic risks are underestimated. Second, the RIS/MND's construction-related HRA utilizes an incorrect Fraction of Time At Home ("FAH") value. Specifically,the HRA utilizes a FAH value of 0.72 for the child receptor(see excerpt below) (p. 4- 15;Table 4.3-4): Table 4.3-4. Construction Diesel PM Inhalation-Pathway Health Risk Assessment Parameter Description/Units Child Receptor Adult Receptor Ca;r Maximum Annual Average Concentration[pg/m3] 0.04718 0.04718 [BR/BW] Daily Breathing Rate per Body Weight[L/kg-day] 861 335 A Absorption Fraction 100% 100% EF Exposure Frequency[360 days/365 days] 0.96 0.96 CPF Cancer Potency Factor[mglkg-day'] 1.1 1.1 ASF Age Sensitivity Factor 3 1 ED Exposure Duration[Years] 2 2 AT Averaging Time[Years] 70 70 FAH Fraction of Time at Home 0.72 0.73 CF Conversion Factor[mg/kg] 1.0 x 10-6 1.0 x 10-6 Carcinogenic Risk(Excess Cancers per Million) 2.64 0.35 SCAQMD Threshold 10 10 Threshold Exceeded? No No Source:TAHA 2021 However,the FAH value used for the childhood age is incorrect, as SCAQMD guidance states: 30"Risk Assessment Guidelines:Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p.2-5. 31"Risk Assessment Guidelines:Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at:https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p.2-5. 15 "For Tiers 1, 2, and 3 screening purposes,the FAH is assumed to be 1 for ages third trimester to 16. As a default, children are assumed to attend a daycare or school in close proximity to their home and no discount should be taken for time spent outside of the area affected by the facility's emissions. People older than age 16 are assumed to spend only 73 percent of their time at home."32 As such, per SCAQMD guidance,the HRA should have used an FAH of 1 for the child receptor.Thus, by utilizing an incorrect FAH value,the RIS/MND's construction HRA underestimates the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction. Third, by failing to prepare a quantified operational HRA,the Project is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions that the Project would generate to the adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions.33 According to the IS/MND,the Project is anticipated to generate 1,503 average daily vehicle trips which will generate additional exhaust emissions and expose nearby sensitive receptors to diesel particulate matter("DPM") emissions regardless (p.4-10). However,the RIS/MND fails to evaluate the potential TACs associated with Project operation or the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects.Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the Project's operational TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in TAC emissions with potential adverse impacts on human health. Fourth,the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA"),the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines:Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015, as referenced by the RIS/MND (p. 4-13).34 The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR").35 Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore,we recommend that health risk impacts from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30- year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month requirement set forth by OEHHA.This recommendation reflects the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, we recommend that an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project operation be included in an EIR for the Project. 32"Risk Assessment Procedures."SCAQMD,August 2017,available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf, p.7. 33"Sierra Club v. County of Fresno."Supreme Court of California, December 2018,available at: https://cegaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf. 34"Risk Assessment Guidelines:Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 35"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at:http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p.8-6,8-15 16 Fifth,while the RIS/MND includes an HRA evaluating the Project's health risk impacts to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction,the HRA fails to evaluate the combined lifetime cancer risk to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction and operation together. According to OEHHA guidance, as referenced by the RIS/MND, "the excess cancer risk is calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at the receptor location" (p. 4-13).36 However, the RIS/MND's HRA fails to sum each age bin to evaluate the total cancer risk over the course of the Project's total construction and operation.This is incorrect and thus, an updated analysis should quantify the entirety of the Project's construction and operational health risks together and sum them to compare to the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, as referenced by the RIS/MND (p. 4-15).37 Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment, we relied upon AERSCREEN, a screening level air quality dispersion model.38 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA39 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated ("CAPCOA")40 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project's operational health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors using the Project's annual PM10 exhaust estimates. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. Subtracting the 735-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project's operational DPM for an additional 27.99 years, approximately.The RIS/MND's annual CalEEMod output file indicates that operational activities will generate approximately 86 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation.41 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources.To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project operation, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: 36"Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p.8-4 37"South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds."SCAQMD,April 2019,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 38"AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model." U.S. EPA,April 2011,available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo.pdf. 39"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 4°"Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects."CAPCOA,July 2009,available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09.pdf. 41 See Attachment A for calculations. 17 grams 85.6 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate ( ) = x x x = 0.00123 g/s second 365 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00123 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 5.2-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with approximate dimensions of 205- by 103-meters.A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution.The population of Rancho Cucamonga was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.42 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures,the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10/0.43 According to the RIS/MND,the nearest sensitive receptors are residential uses located directly adjacent to the Project site (p. 4-13). However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that the maximally exposed individual resident("MEIR") is located approximately 100 meters from the Project site.Thus,the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 1.964 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.1964 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD.44 Consistent with the 735-day construction schedule,the annualized averaged concentration for operation was used for the latter 0.24 years of the infant stage of life (0—2 years), as well as the entire child (2—16 years) and adult (16—30 years) stages of life. Consistent with OEHHA guidance, as recommended by SCAQMD and referenced by the IS/MND,we used Age Sensitivity Factors ("ASF(s)")to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution (p. 4-15).45According to this guidance,the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant). Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th 42"Rancho Cucamonga." U.S. Census Bureau,2020,available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geold/0659451. 43"Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." EPA, 1992,available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf;see also"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p.4-36. 44"Supplemental Guidelines for Submission of Rule 1200 Health Risk Assessments(HRAs)."SDAPCD,July 2019, available at:https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Toxics Program/APCD 1200 Supplemental Guidelines.pdf. 45"Supplemental Guidelines for Submission of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 18 percentile breathing rates for infants.46 Finally, consistent with OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home ("FAH")Value of 1 for the infant and child receptors, and a FAH value of 0.73 for adult receptors.47 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-'and an averaging time of 25,550 days.The results of our calculations are shown in the tables below. The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor A e Grou Emissions Duration Concentration Breathing Cancer Risk ASF Cancer Risk g p Source (years) (ug/m3) Rate(L/kg-day) (without ASFs*) (with ASFs*) 3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 * 361 * 10 Construction 1., Operation 0.24 V.1JVY VIE 07 Infant Total 2 7.62E-07 10 7.62E-06 (Age 0-2) Child Operation 14 0.1964 572 2.37E-05 3 7.11E-05 (Age 2-16) Adult (Age 16 30) Operation 14 0.1964 261 7.89E-06 1 7.89E-06 Lifetime 30 3.24E-05 8.66E-05 *Cancer risk calculated separately in the RIS/MND. As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks to infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project operation, are approximately 7.62, 71.1, and 7.89 in one million, respectively.The excess cancer risk associated with the Project operation over the course of a residential lifetime is approximately 86.6 in one million. When summing the Project's operational cancer risk, as estimated by SWAPE, with the RIS/MND's construction-related cancer risk of 2.64 and 0.35 in one million,48 we estimate an excess cancer risk of approximately 89.59 in one million over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) (p. 4-15;Table 4.3-4).49 As such,the 46"Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act."SCAQMD,June 2015,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 19;see also"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 47"Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1,and 212."SCAQMD,August 2017,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf, p.7, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/Proposed- Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf. 48 It is important to note that the RIS/MND's construction-related cancer risk is underestimated,as it fails to start exposure in the third trimester of pregnancy. 49 Calculated:86.6 in one million+2.64 in one million+0.35 in one million =89.59 in one million. 19 lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million,thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the RIS/MND. An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project's air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection.The purpose of the screening-level construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project's emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used.Thus, an EIR should be prepared, including a quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation. Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts The RIS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse ("GHG") emissions of 2,935.3 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year("MT CO2e/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year(p. 4-37,Table 4.8-1). Table 4.8-1. Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Category Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e per year) Amortized Construction Emissions (Direct) 99.7 Area Source Emissions (Direct) 1-1.6 Energy Source Emissions (Indirect) 700.1 Mobile Source Emissions(Direct) 1.659.6 Solid Waste Disposal Emissions(Indirect) 304.7 Water SuooIv and Wastewater Treatment(Indirect) 159.5 Total Annual GHG Emissions 2,935.3 Threshold 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No Source: TAHA 2022 Furthermore,the RIS/MND relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS,the San Bernardino Regional GHG Reduction Plan, and the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan ("CAP") in order to conclude that the Project would result in a less-than-significant GHG impact(p. 4-37—4-39). However, the RIS/MND's GHG analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons: (1) The RIS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model; (2) The RIS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) The RIS/MND fails to indicate a potentially significant GHG impact; and (4) SWAPE's updated analysis indicates a potentially significant GHG impact. 20 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the RIS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,935.3 MT CO2e/year(p.4-37,Table 4.8-1). However,the RIS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the Updated Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health Risk Assessment Modeling Outputs as Appendix K to the RIS/MND, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the RIS/MND. As a result,the model underestimates the Project's emissions, and the RIS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the surrounding environment. 2) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated,the RIS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,935.3 MT CO2e/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year(p.4-37,Table 4.8-1). However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold,the SCAQMD's 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as "AB 32",was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California.AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.50 Furthermore,AEP guidance states: "[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone."51 As it is currently March 2022,thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the RIS/MND's less-than- significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year("MT CO2e/SP/year"),which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.52 3) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact When applying the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets,the Project's incorrect and unsubstantiated air model 5°"HEALTH &SAFETY CODE 38550."available at: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC§ionNum=38550. 51"Beyond Newhall and 2020:A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California."Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP),October 2016,available at: https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016 Final White Paper.pdf, p. 39. 52"Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group#15."SCAQMD,September 2010,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 21 indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.53 As previously stated,the RIS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,935.3 MT CO2e/year(p. 4-37,Table 4.8-1). Furthermore, according to CAPCOA's CEQA & Climate Change report, service population ("SP") is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project."54 The RIS/MND states: "With regards to the AQMP growth projections, operation of the proposed Project would introduce 260 new multi-family residential units to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, with an expected population of approximately 788 individuals as discussed in Section 4.14 Population and Housing" (p.4-11). As such, we estimate a SP of 788 people. When dividing the Project's net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the RIS/MND, by a SP of 788 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 3.7 MT CO2e/SP/year(see table below).55 RIS/NMD Greenhouse Gas Emissions Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 2,935.3 Service Population 788 Service Population Efficiency(MT CO2e/SP/year) 3.7 SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0 Exceeds? Yes As demonstrated above,the Project's service population efficiency value, as estimated by the RIS/MND's provided net annual GHG emission estimates and SP, exceed the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the RIS/MND.As a result,the RIS/MND's less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon.An EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less-than- significant levels. 4) Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to more accurately estimate the Project's construction-related and operational emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND. In our updated models, we included the correct land use sizes and solid waste generation rates; omitted the unsubstantiated changes to architectural and area coating emission factors,gas fireplace values, operational vehicle fleet mix percentages, and off-road equipment horsepower values; 53"Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group#15."SCAQMD,September 2010,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 54"CEQA&Climate Change." CAPCOA,January 2008,available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf, p.71-72. ss Calculated: (2,935.3 MT CO2e/year)/(788 service population)=(3.7 MT CO2e/SP/year). 22 incorporated Tier 4 Interim instead of Tier 4 Final emission standards; and excluded the incorrect operational mitigation measures.56 SWAPE's updated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact,when applying the outdated SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year.The updated CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE with Project-specific information, disclose the Project's mitigated emissions,which include approximately 2,922 MT CO2e of total construction emissions (sum of 2022, 2023, and 2024) and approximately 3,637 MT CO2e/year of net annual operational emissions (sum of area-, energy-, mobile-, waste-, and water-related emissions). When amortizing the Project's construction-related GHG emissions over a period of 30 years and summing them with the Project's operational GHG emissions, we estimate net annual GHG emissions of approximately 3,734 MT CO2e/year(see table below). SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Total Construction 2,921.81 Construction (amortized over 30 years) 97.39 Area 57.88 Energy 737.69 Mobile 2,371.12 Waste 310.42 Water 159.54 Annual Operational 3,636.65 Total Net Annual GHG Emissions 3,734.04 SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Exceeds? Yes As demonstrated above,the Project's net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, exceed the outdated SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year, thus resulting in a significant impact not previously addressed or mitigated in the RIS/MND. As a result,the RIS/MND's less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. An EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less- than-significant levels. Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant health risk and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further.As such, in an effort to reduce the Project's emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project.Therefore,to reduce the Project's emissions, we recommend consideration of SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR's Air Quality Project 56 See Attachment C for CalEEMod output files. 23 Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-AQ-1") and Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-GHG-1"), as described below:57 SCAG RTP/SCS 2020-2045 Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures—PMM-AQ-1: In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency: a) Minimize land disturbance. b)Suspend grading and earth moving when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dust plumes. c)Cover trucks when hauling dirt. d)Stabilize the surface of dirt piles if not removed immediately. e) Limit vehicular paths on unpaved surfaces and stabilize any temporary roads. f) Minimize unnecessary vehicular and machinery activities. g)Sweep paved streets at least once per day where there is evidence of dirt that has been carried on to the roadway. h) Revegetate disturbed land, including vehicular paths created during construction to avoid future off-road vehicular activities. j) Require contractors to assemble a comprehensive inventory list(i.e., make, model,engine year, horsepower, emission rates)of all heavy-duty off-road (portable and mobile)equipment(50 horsepower and greater)that could be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. Prepare a plan for approval by the applicable air district demonstrating achievement of the applicable percent reduction for a CARB-approved fleet. k) Ensure that all construction equipment is properly tuned and maintained. I) Minimize idling time to 5 minutes—saves fuel and reduces emissions. m) Provide an operational water truck on-site at all times. Use watering trucks to minimize dust;watering should be sufficient to confine dust plumes to the project work areas.Sweep paved streets at least once per day where there is evidence of dirt that has been carried on to the roadway. n) Utilize existing power sources(e.g., power poles)or clean fuel generators rather than temporary power generators. o) Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities.The plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation,and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service. Schedule operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. Provide a flag person to guide traffic properly and ensure safety at construction sites. "4.0 Mitigation Measures."Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum#1,September 2020,available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/fpeir connectsocal addendum 4 mitigationmeasures.pdf?1606004420, p.4.0-2—4.0-10;4.0-19— 4.0-23;See also: "Certified Final Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report."Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG), May 2020,available at: https://scag.ca.gov/peir. 24 p)As appropriate require that portable engines and portable engine-driven equipment units used at the project work site,with the exception of on-road and off-road motor vehicles,obtain CARB Portable Equipment Registration with the state or a local district permit.Arrange appropriate consultations with the CARB or the District to determine registration and permitting requirements prior to equipment operation at the site. q) Require projects within 500 feet of residences, hospitals, or schools to use Tier 4 equipment for all engines above 50 horsepower(hp) unless the individual project can demonstrate that Tier 4 engines would not be required to mitigate emissions below significance thresholds. r) Projects located within the South Coast Air Basin should consider applying for South Coast AQMD"SOON" funds which provides funds to applicable fleets for the purchase of commercially available low-emission heavy- duty engines to achieve near-term reduction of NOx emissions from in-use off-road diesel vehicles. s) Projects located within AB 617 communities should review the applicable Community Emissions Reduction Plan (CERP)for additional mitigation that can be applied to individual projects. t)Where applicable, projects should provide information about air quality related programs to schools, including the Environmental Justice Community Partnerships(EJCP),Clean Air Ranger Education (CARE), and Why Air Quality Matters programs. u) Projects should work with local cities and counties to install adequate signage that prohibits truck idling in certain locations(e.g., near schools and sensitive receptors). y) Projects that will introduce sensitive receptors within 500 feet of freeways and other sources should consider installing high efficiency of enhanced filtration units,such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value(MERV) 13 or better. Installation of enhanced filtration units can be verified during occupancy inspection prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. z) Develop an ongoing monitoring, inspection,and maintenance program for the MERV filters. aa)Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities. bb)The following criteria related to diesel emissions shall be implemented on by individual project sponsors as appropriate and feasible: - Diesel nonroad vehicles on site for more than 10 total days shall have either(1)engines that meet EPA on road emissions standards or(2) emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85% - Diesel generators on site for more than 10 total days shall be equipped with emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%. - Nonroad diesel engines on site shall be Tier 2 or higher. - Diesel nonroad construction equipment on site for more than 10 total days shall have either(1)engines meeting EPA Tier 4 nonroad emissions standards or(2)emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB for use with nonroad engines to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%for engines for 50 hp and greater and by a minimum of 20%for engines less than 50 hp. - Emission control technology shall be operated, maintained, and serviced as recommended by the emission control technology manufacturer. - Diesel vehicles,construction equipment,and generators on site shall be fueled with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD)or a biodiesel blend approved by the original engine manufacturer with sulfur content of 15 ppm or less. - The construction contractor shall maintain a list of all diesel vehicles,construction equipment,and generators to be used on site.The list shall include the following: i. Contractor and subcontractor name and address, plus contact person responsible for the vehicles or equipment. ii. Equipment type,equipment manufacturer,equipment serial number, engine manufacturer, engine model year,engine certification (Tier rating), horsepower,engine serial number,and expected fuel usage and hours of operation. iii. For the emission control technology installed:technology type,serial number, make, model, manufacturer, EPA/CARB verification number/level, and installation date and hour-meter reading on installation date. 25 - The contractor shall establish generator sites and truck-staging zones for vehicles waiting to load or unload material on site.Such zones shall be located where diesel emissions have the least impact on abutters,the general public,and especially sensitive receptors such as hospitals,schools, daycare facilities,elderly housing, and convalescent facilities. - The contractor shall maintain a monthly report that,for each on road diesel vehicle, nonroad construction equipment,or generator onsite, includes: i. Hour-meter readings on arrival on-site,the first and last day of every month,and on off-site date. ii. Any problems with the equipment or emission controls. iii. Certified copies of fuel deliveries for the time period that identify: 1. Source of supply 2. Quantity of fuel 3. Quantity of fuel, including sulfur content(percent by weight) cc) Project should exceed Title-24 Building Envelope Energy Efficiency Standards(California Building Standards Code).The following measures can be used to increase energy efficiency: - Provide pedestrian network improvements,such as interconnected street network, narrower roadways and shorter block lengths,sidewalks, accessibility to transit and transit shelters,traffic calming measures, parks and public spaces, minimize pedestrian barriers. - Provide traffic calming measures,such as: Marked crosswalks ii. Count-down signal timers iii. Curb extensions iv.Speed tables iv. Raised crosswalks v. Raised intersections vi. Median islands vii. Tight corner radii viii. Roundabouts or mini-circles ix. On-street parking x. Chicanes/chokers - Create urban non-motorized zones - Provide bike parking in non-residential and multi-unit residential projects - Dedicate land for bike trails - Limit parking supply through: Elimination (or reduction)of minimum parking requirements ii. Creation of maximum parking requirements iii. Provision of shared parking - Require residential area parking permit. - Provide ride-sharing programs Designate a certain percentage of parking spacing for ride sharing vehicles ii. Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride-sharing vehicles iii. Providing a web site or messaging board for coordinating rides iv. Permanent transportation management association membership and finding requirement. Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures—PMM-GHG-1 In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency: b) Reduce emissions resulting from projects through implementation of project features, project design, or other measures,such as those described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines. 26 c) Include off-site measures to mitigate a project's emissions. d) Measures that consider incorporation of Best Available Control Technology(BACT) during design, construction and operation of projects to minimize GHG emissions, including but not limited to: Use energy and fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment; ii. Deployment of zero-and/or near zero emission technologies; iii. Use lighting systems that are energy efficient,such as LED technology; iv. Use the minimum feasible amount of GHG-emitting construction materials; v. Use cement blended with the maximum feasible amount of flash or other materials that reduce GHG emissions from cement production; vi. Incorporate design measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse; vii. Incorporate design measures to reduce energy consumption and increase use of renewable energy; viii. Incorporate design measures to reduce water consumption; ix. Use lighter-colored pavement where feasible; x. Recycle construction debris to maximum extent feasible; xi. Plant shade trees in or near construction projects where feasible; and xii. Solicit bids that include concepts listed above. e) Measures that encourage transit use,carpooling, bike-share and car-share programs,active transportation, and parking strategies, including, but not limited to the following: Promote transit-active transportation coordinated strategies; ii. Increase bicycle carrying capacity on transit and rail vehicles; iii. Improve or increase access to transit; iv. Increase access to common goods and services,such as groceries, schools,and day care; v. Incorporate affordable housing into the project; vi. Incorporate the neighborhood electric vehicle network; vii. Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; viii. Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks,or transit service; ix. Provide traffic calming measures; x. Provide bicycle parking; xi. Limit or eliminate park supply; xii. Unbundle parking costs; xiii. Provide parking cash-out programs; xiv. Implement or provide access to commute reduction program; f) Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into project designs, maintaining these facilities, and providing amenities incentivizing their use; and planning for and building local bicycle projects that connect with the regional network; g) Improving transit access to rail and bus routes by incentives for construction and transit facilities within developments,and/or providing dedicated shuttle service to transit stations;and h)Adopting employer trip reduction measures to reduce employee trips such as vanpool and carpool programs, providing end-of-trip facilities, and telecommuting programs including but not limited to measures that: Provide car-sharing, bike sharing,and ride-sharing programs; ii. Provide transit passes; iii. Shift single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling,for example providing ride- matching services; 27 iv. Provide incentives or subsidies that increase that use of modes other than single-occupancy vehicle; v. Provide on-site amenities at places of work,such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking,and showers and locker rooms; vi. Provide employee transportation coordinators at employment sites; vii. Provide a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes. i) Designate a percentage of parking spaces for ride-sharing vehicles or high-occupancy vehicles, and provide adequate passenger loading and unloading for those vehicles; j) Land use siting and design measures that reduce GHG emissions, including: Developing on infill and brownfields sites; ii. Building compact and mixed-use developments near transit; iii. Retaining on-site mature trees and vegetation, and planting new canopy trees; iv. Measures that increase vehicle efficiency,encourage use of zero and low emissions vehicles, or reduce the carbon content of fuels, including constructing or encouraging construction of electric vehicle charging stations or neighborhood electric vehicle networks,or charging for electric bicycles; and v. Measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse. k)Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities.The measures provided above are also intended to be applied in low income and minority communities as applicable and feasible. I) Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle charging stations, or at a minimum, require the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for passenger vehicles and trucks to plug-in. m) Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules,such as: Staggered starting times ii. Flexible schedules iii. Compressed work weeks n) Implement commute trip reduction marketing,such as: New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options ii. Event promotions iii. Publications o) Implement preferential parking permit program p) Implement school pool and bus programs q) Price workplace parking,such as: Explicitly charging for parking for its employees; ii. Implementing above market rate pricing; iii. Validating parking only for invited guests; iv. Not providing employee parking and transportation allowances; and v. Educating employees about available alternatives. These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are 28 implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds.The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval,to ensure that the Project's significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible. Disclaimer SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented.This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Attachment A: Health Risk Calculations Attachment B: AERSCREEN Output Files Attachment C: CalEEMod Output Files Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV Attachment E: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV 29 Attachment A Operation Emission Rate Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0428 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.234520548 Total DPM (Ibs) 85.6 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001231233 Release Height (meters) 3 Total Acreage 5.2 Max Horizontal (meters) 205.15 Min Horizontal (meters) 102.58 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Setting Urban Population 174,453 Start Date 3/5/2022 End Date 3/9/2024 Total Construction Days 735 Total Years of Construction 2.01 Total Years of Operation 27.99 Attachment B Start date and time 03/09/22 16:22:09 AERSCREEN 21112 Alta Cuvee, Operation Alta Cuvee, Operation DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** Emission Rate: 0.123E-02 g/s 0.977E-02 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 205.15 meters 673.06 feet Area Source Width: 102.58 meters 336.55 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 174453 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*) : not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2022.03.09_Aerscreen_AltaCuvee_Operation.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics. . . Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 03/09/22 16:24:40 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 03/09/22 16:24:50 REFINE started 03/09/22 16:24:50 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 03/09/22 16:24:51 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 03/09/22 16:24:53 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.15020E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16425E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17610E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18610E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19637E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.19734E+01 103.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15377E+01 125.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11000E+01 150.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89502E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75200E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64408E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56051E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49393E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44001E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39580E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35826E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32688E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29975E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27646E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25606E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23804E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22221E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20821E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19563E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18421E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17390E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09 Aerscreen A1taCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13.04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16458E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15613E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14843E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14130E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13475E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12873E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12316E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11801E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11319E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10871E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10454E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10064E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.96972E-01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93512E-01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90263E-01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87208E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84339E-01 1025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81621E-01 1050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79052E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76626E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74328E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72149E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70080E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68114E-01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66243E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64450E-01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62740E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09_Aerscreen_AltaCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61109E-01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59550E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58057E-01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56621E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55246E-01 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53928E-01 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52665E-01 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51452E-01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50287E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49171E-01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48094E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47057E-01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46060E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45098E-01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44171E-01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43277E-01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42414E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41580E-01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40775E-01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39997E-01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39244E-01 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38516E-01 1825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37811E-01 1850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37128E-01 1875.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36751E-01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36098E-01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35466E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09 Aerscreen A1taCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34852E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34257E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33679E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33117E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32572E-01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32042E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31526E-01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31025E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30538E-01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30064E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29602E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29152E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28715E-01 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28288E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27872E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27467E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27072E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26686E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26310E-01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25943E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25585E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25235E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24894E-01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24560E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24234E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23916E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23605E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09_Aerscreen_AltaCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23300E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23003E-01 2675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22712E-01 2700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22427E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22148E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21876E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21608E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21347E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21091E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20840E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20595E-01 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20354E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20119E-01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19888E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19661E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19439E-01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19221E-01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19008E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18798E-01 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18593E-01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18391E-01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18193E-01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17999E-01 3199.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17808E-01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17621E-01 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17437E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17257E-01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09 Aerscreen A1taCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17079E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16905E-01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16734E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16566E-01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16400E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16238E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16078E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15921E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15767E-01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15615E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15466E-01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15319E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15175E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15033E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14893E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14756E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14620E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14487E-01 3750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14356E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14227E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14100E-01 3825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13975E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13852E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13730E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13611E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13493E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13377E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09_Aerscreen_AltaCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13263E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13150E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13039E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12930E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12822E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12716E-01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12611E-01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12508E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12406E-01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12306E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12207E-01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12110E-01 4275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12013E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11918E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11825E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11733E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11641E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11552E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11463E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11375E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11289E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11204E-01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11120E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11037E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10955E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10874E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10794E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09 Aerscreen A1taCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10715E-01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10637E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10560E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10484E-01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10409E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10335E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10262E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10190E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10118E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10048E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99780E-02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99091E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98411E-02 4975.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97738E-02 5000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.03.09_Aerscreen_AltaCuvee_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[3/16/2022 2:13:04 PM] Attachment C CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 5.54 + 1000sgft ; 0.13 5,537.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 328.00 + Space ; 0.00 131,200.00 + 0 Parking Lot 200.00 + Space ; 1.80 80,000.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,375.00 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.58 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 3,572.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 354,053.00 + 785 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 r f I. Strip Mall 2.44 1000sgft 0.00 2,436.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 627.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Land Use- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Residential Land Use Size" and "Underestimated Parking Land Use Size" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Construction Phase- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values." Energy Use - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Solid Waste- See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates" Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Final Mitigation" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation" Fleet Mix- See SWAPE comment regarding "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix." CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 6.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 3.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim I. tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change 7 Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 540.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 390.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 18.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 96.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 108.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 772.17 164.47 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual tblEnergyUse T24E • 845.95 177.65 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.92 3.50 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.07 2.74 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 4.58 4.09 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 25.90 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 0.10 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 21,180.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 10,590.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 5,540.00 5,537.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 14,374.80 14,375.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 3,580.00 3,572.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 259,000.00 354,053.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 1,000.00 1,570.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 2,440.00 2,436.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 2.95 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.08 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 6.82 3.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r . tblLandUse Population i 741.00 785.00 r . tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 r • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 2.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r . tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 627.49 r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 584.00 f r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 0.03 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.46 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual tblSolidWaste • SolidWasteGenerationRate • 20.41 0.00 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 2.56 28.10 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.06 tblVehicleTrips HOTTP 40.60 • 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP • 40.60 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL } 5.90 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HSTTP i 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP } 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PRTP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 34.08 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 1.05 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 34.08 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 6.65 5.48 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 1.89 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 5.81 0.00 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 33.82 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 44.32 34.08 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 24,295,400.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 65,154.03 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 984,644.96 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 211,732.46 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 180,736.95 2,979,860.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 603,492.07 0.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 110,774.26 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 •1 0.3077 i 2.9439 1 2.9131 i 8.6700e- 1 0.3829 0.0913 i 0.4741 0.0906 i 0.0866 0.1772 0.0000 i 786.8868 1 786.8868 i 0.0941 1 0.0000 i 789.2398 I 9 I I I 003 I I I I . I I I 1 1 '9 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I 1 ,1 J J J 2023 .1 3.1367 i 5.7500 : 8.7114 i 0.0212 1 0.8649 0.2025 i 1.0674 0.2321 i 0.1954 0.4276 : 0.0000 i 1,899.942: 1,899.942 i 0.1992 : 0.0000 11,904.923 9 I I I 1 I I . 1 8 I 8 1 1 9 9I I I 1 1 . 1 2024 •1 0.0833 i 0.5883 : 0.9628 i 2.5300e- 1 0.1247 0.0167 i 0.1414 0.0334 i 0.0162 0.0496 • 0.0000 i 227.1850 : 227.1850 i 0.0187 1 0.0000 I 227.6522 9 I I I 003 I I I I I . I I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I . I I I I i Maximum 3.1367 5.7500 8.7114 0.0212 0.8649 0.2025 1.0674 0.2321 0.1954 0.4276 0.0000 1,899.942 1,899.942 0.1992 0.0000 1,904.923 11 8 8 9 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ' PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 9 0.1913 1 2.3047 1 3.3178 1 8.6700e- 1 0.3829 1 0.0149 1 0.3978 1 0.0906 1 0.0147 : 0.1053 0.0000 786.8864 : 786.8864 1 0.0941 1 0.0000 i 789.2394 9 I 1 I 003 I 1 I I . I 1 •� I I . I I I J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2023 9 2.9341 i 5.6849 : 9.4808 i 0.0212 1 0.8649 : 0.0632 i 0.9281 : 0.2321 i 0.0627 0.2949 . 0.0000 1,899.941 : 1,899.941 I 0.1992 1 0.0000 11,904.922 9I I I I I I I I . 8 I 8 I I i 8 9I I I I I I I I . I I 9 J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2024 9 0.0642 i 0.5996 : 1.0423 i 2.5300e- 1 0.1247 : 3.7100e- i 0.1284 : 0.0334 i 3.6500e- 0.0371 . 0.0000 227.1849 : 227.1849 i 0.0187 : 0.0000 1227.6520 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I 1 I 003 ■ 1 I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I . I I I Maximum 2.9341 5.6849 9.4808 0.0212 0.8649 0.0632 0.9281 0.2321 0.0627 0.2949 0.0000 1,899.941 1,899.941 0.1992 0.0000 1,904.922 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 9.58 7.47 -9.96 0.00 0.00 73.65 13.58 0.00 72.81 33.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) 1 3-5-2022 6-4-2022 1.0409 0.6503 2 6-5-2022 9-4-2022 0.6314 0.5954 3 9-5-2022 12-4-2022 1.0487 0.8075 4 12-5-2022 3-4-2023 1.1862 1.0962 5 3-5-2023 6-4-2023 1.7816 1.7257 6 6-5-2023 9-4-2023 2.8553 2.7654 7 9-5-2023 12-4-2023 3.1483 3.0713 8 12-5-2023 3-4-2024 0.9541 0.9340 9 3-5-2024 6-4-2024 0.0274 0.0264 Highest 3.1483 3.0713 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •4 1.5321 i 0.0768 : 2.7065 i 4.3000e- 1 : 0.0186 i 0.0186 : i 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 i 57.4636 : 57.4636 i 5.2500e- 1 9.7000e- i 57.8849 9I I I 004 1 I I I I . I I I 003 I 004 I 91 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 ;l J J J J J J J J 4 I J J J Energy •1 0.0209 i 0.1788 : 0.0766 i 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 i 0.0145 : i 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 i 734.3489 : 734.3489 i 0.0283 1 8.8400e- 1 737.6910 9 I I : 003 1 I I I . I I 1 003 I 91 1 1 1 1 . I 1 ;1 J J J J J J J J V J J J Mobile •1 0.4302 i 2.9752 : 5.6448 i 0.0255 1 2.0948 1 0.0155 i 2.1103 : 0.5614 i 0.0144 0.5758 : 0.0000 i 2,368.464:2,368.464 i 0.1061 1 0.0000 1 2,371.116 9 I I I 1 I I I I . 1 I 1 I 1 1 7 '� I I I I . I I I 1 ;� J J J J J J J J I J J J Waste •1 1 1 1 i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 125.2962 i 0.0000 : 125.2962 i 7.4048 1 0.0000 1 310.4160 9 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 '9 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 ;� J J J J J J J J V I J J J i i i 1 1 i i i i i 1 Water .1 1 1 1 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • 8.6532 i 136.5093 : 145.1625 i 0.8951 0.0223 1 174.1820 '9 1 I I I I I I I ; I I I I '� . I I 1 Total 1.9832 3.2308 8.4279 0.0271 2.0948 0.0485 2.1433 0.5614 0.0474 0.6088 133.9494 3,296.785 3,430.735 8.4396 0.0321 3,651.290 8 2 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •4 1.5321 i 0.0768 : 2.7065 i 4.3000e- 1 : 0.0186 i 0.0186 : i 0.0186 0.0186 • 0.0000 i 57.4636 : 57.4636 i 5.2500e- 1 9.7000e- i 57.8849 '1 I I I 004 1 I I I I ; I 003 004 i 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I i ;l J J J J J J J J 4 I J J J Energy •1 0.0209 i 0.1788 : 0.0766 i 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 i 0.0145 : i 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 i 734.3489 : 734.3489 i 0.0283 1 8.8400e- 1 737.6910 '1 I I 1 003 1 I I I . I : 1 003 I . I 1 ;1 J J J J J J J J V J J J Mobile •1 0.4302 i 2.9752 : 5.6448 i 0.0255 1 2.0948 1 0.0155 i 2.1103 : 0.5614 i 0.0144 0.5758 : 0.0000 i 2,368.464:2,368.464 i 0.1061 1 0.0000 1 2,371.116 '1 I I I 1 I I I I . 1 I 1 I 1 1 7 '1 I I I I . I I I 1 ;� J J J J J J J J I J J J Waste •1 i i i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 125.2962 i 0.0000 : 125.2962 i 7.4048 1 0.0000 1 310.4160 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I i I I '9 I I 1 I I I I . I I I I i ;� J J J J J J J J J J J Water •1 i i i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • 7.8744 i 125.2508 : 133.1252 i 0.8146 1 0.0203 1 159.5371 'I 1 I I I I I I I ; I I I 9 . I I 1 Total 1.9832 3.2308 8.4279 0.0271 2.0948 0.0485 2.1433 0.5614 0.0474 0.6088 133.1706 3,285.527 3,418.697 8.3591 0.0301 3,636.645 3 8 5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.34 0.35 0.95 6.23 0.40 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 :Demolition :Demolition 3/5/2022 :3/18/2022 : 6: 12: I + i k 2 :Site Preparation :Grading 4/4/2022 :4/30/2022 : 6: 24: I + , i , i , 3 :Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Site Preparation 5/2/2022 :5/28/2022 : 6: 24: I + , i , i , 4 :Construction-East Building :Building Construction 5/30/2022 :2/17/2024 : 6: 540: I + , i i , 5 :Grading :Grading 11/7/2022 :11/26/2022 : 61, 18: I + , i i . 4 , 6 :Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation 11/28/2022 :12/10/2022 : 61, 12: I + , , I 1 1 7 :Construction-West Building :Building Construction 12/12/2022 :3/9/2024 : 6: 390: I + , i , i , 8 :Paving-East Building :Paving 5/8/2023 :9/9/2023 : 6: 108: I + , i i , 9 :Architectural Coatings-East Bldg :Architectural Coating 5/8/2023 :7/29/2023 : 61, 72: I + , i , i , 10 :Paving-West Building :Paving 8/7/2023 :11/25/2023 : 6: 96: I + 4 11 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:Architectural Coating '9/11/2023 :12/2/2023 6' 72' Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 720,137; Residential Outdoor: 240,046; Non-Residential Indoor: 11,960; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,987; Striped Parking Area: 12,672 (Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.00 81: 0.73 -I- Demolition :Excavators ; 11 8.001 158' 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 21 4.001 84' 0.74 Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 01 8.001 247' 0.40 + i- r Demolition :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1. 8.00' 97: 0.37 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors 2• 8.00• 212• 0.43 Site Preparation Excavators ; 0 8.00 158' 0.38 • y ; Site Preparation :Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 • J. i Site Preparation Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Aerial Lifts ; 2 7.00 63• 0.31 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 0 7.001 i 231• 0.29 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. i Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.00 84• 0.74 J. ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.00 100• 0.40 • J. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158• 0.38 • J. i Grading Graders ; 1 8.00 187• 0.41 • J. ; Grading :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Grading :Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 * r Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Rubber Tired Dozers 0• 8.00• 247• 0.40 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • Trenching/Utilities-West Building •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 8.00• 97• 0.37 Trenching/Utilities-West Building Trenchers ; 2 8.001 78' 0.50 • .1. ; Construction-West Building :Cranes ; 0 7.0O1 231' 0.29 • J. Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.0O1 89• 0.20 • J. Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.00 84• 0.74 • J. Construction-West Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.00 100• 0.40 • J. Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 • J. Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. Paving-East Building :Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 • J. Paving-East Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. Paving-East Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. Architectural Coatings-East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 5 8.00 78• 0.48 • J. Paving-West Building :Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 • J. Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. Paving-West Building Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 5• 8.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 5; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 6; 40.00i 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Cnc,+Q..;Irl;n., , I I , Construction 'East i 6; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I T Grading 6; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix HHDTe I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 1,440.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT \4/.,n+Q..;1,1 n., I I , I Construction-West i 4; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I , Architectural Coatings y 5; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT Cnn+Q1.1n I I I , I I Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix ,HDT_Mix THHDT i r + II I + Architectural Coatings : 5' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90: 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \l1/..c.+DId, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 6.3300e- 1 0.0551 1 0.0770 1 1.3000e- 1 1 2.8400e- 1 2.8400e- 1 1 2.7500e- : 2.7500e- • 0.0000 I 10.9785 1 10.9785 1 1.7500e- 0.0000 i 11.0222 9 003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 6.3300e- 0.0551 0.0770 1.3000e- 2.8400e- 2.8400e- 2.7500e- 2.7500e- 0.0000 10.9785 10.9785 1.7500e- 0.0000 11.0222 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 Worker •I 1.0300e- 1 7.5000e- 1 7.8400e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6300e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6500e- 1 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- • 0.0000 I 2.1051 1 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 : 2.1064 •1 003 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 003 I 004 I005 004 : i I I 005 Total 1.0300e- 7.5000e- 7.8400e- 2.0000e- 2.6300e- 2.0000e- 2.6500e- 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.1051 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 2.1064-' 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 2.2100e- 1 0.0493 1 0.0851 1 1.3000e- 1 1 1.8000e- 1 1.8000e- 1 1 1.8000e- : 1.8000e- • 0.0000 I 10.9785 1 10.9785 1 1.7500e- 0.0000 i 11.0222 9 003 I I I 004 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 • 1 I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 2.2100e- 0.0493 0.0851 1.3000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 10.9785 10.9785 1.7500e- 0.0000 11.0222 003 004 004 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 Worker •I 1.0300e- 1 7.5000e- 1 7.8400e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6300e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6500e- 1 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- • 0.0000 I 2.1051 1 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 : 2.1064 •1 003 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 003 I 004 I005 004 : i I I 005 Total 1.0300e- 7.5000e- 7.8400e- 2.0000e- 2.6300e- 2.0000e- 2.6500e- 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.1051 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 2.1064-' 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 0.0318 1 0.0000 1 0.0318 3.4400e- 1 0.0000 3.4400e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 '1 I I I I I 1 I 003 I 003 . 1 1 I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0306 0.3560 0.1974 1 5.1000e- 1 1 0.0140 1 0.0140 1 1 0.0129 0.0129 : 0.0000 1 45.0455 1 45.0455 1 0.0146 0.0000 i 45.4097 '1 I I I 004 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 '1 I I I I 1 1 I I . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.0306 0.3560 0.1974 5.1000e- 0.0318 0.0140 0.0458 3.4400e- 0.0129 0.0163 0.0000 45.0455 45.0455 0.0146 0.0000 45.4097 004 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 2.0700e- 1.5000e- 0.0157 1 5.0000e- 1 5.2600e- 1 3.0000e- 1 5.3000e- 1 1.4000e- 3.0000e- 1.4300e- • 0.0000 1 4.2102 1 4.2102 1.1000e- 1 0.0000 : 4.2129 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 1 005 003 : i I I 004 Total 2.0700e- 1.5000e- 0.0157 5.0000e- 5.2600e- 3.0000e- 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 3.0000e- 1.4300e- 0.0000 4.2102 4.2102 1.1000e- 0.0000 4.2129 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 0.0318 1 0.0000 1 0.0318 3.4400e- 1 0.0000 : 3.4400e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I 1 1 I 003 I 003 , 1 I I I 1 'I 1 I I I 1 I I I • 1 I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 8.7800e- 0.1463 0.2871 1 5.1000e- 1 1 8.4000e- 1 8.4000e- 1 1 8.4000e- 8.4000e- i 0.0000 1 45.0454 1 45.0454 1 0.0146 0.0000 i 45.4096 '1 003 I I I 004 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 1 I I I 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • 1 1 I I 1 Total 8.7800e- 0.1463 0.2871 5.1000e- 0.0318 8.4000e- 0.0327 3.4400e- 8.4000e- 4.2800e- 0.0000 45.0454 45.0454 0.0146 0.0000 45.4096 003 004 004 003 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I Worker •1 2.0700e- 1.5000e- 0.0157 1 5.0000e- 1 5.2600e- 1 3.0000e- 1 5.3000e- 1 1.4000e- 3.0000e- 1.4300e- • 0.0000 1 4.2102 1 4.2102 1 1.1000e- 1 0.0000 : 4.2129 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 1 005 003 : i I I 004 Total 2.0700e- 1.5000e- 0.0157 5.0000e- 5.2600e- 3.0000e- 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 3.0000e- 1.4300e- 0.0000 4.2102 4.2102 1.1000e- 0.0000 4.2129 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 I Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 0.0139 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0139 I 1 1.5600e- 1 1 0.0000 1.5600e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 '1 I I I I 1 1 I 003 I 003 . 1 I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0225 0.2454 0.1448 1 3.1000e- 1 1 0.0123 1 0.0123 1 1 0.0113 0.0113 : 0.0000 1 26.9238 1 26.9238 1 8.7100e- 0.0000 i 27.1415 '1 I I I 004 I 1 I I I . 1 1 I 003 1 1 '1 I I I I 1 1 I I . 1 1 I I 1 Total 0.0225 0.2454 0.1448 3.1000e- 0.0139 0.0123 0.0262 1.5600e- 0.0113 0.0129 0.0000 26.9238 26.9238 8.7100e- 0.0000 27.1415 004 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 8.2500e- 1 0.3078 0.0524 1 1.0900e- 0.0248 1 7.7000e- 1 0.0256 1 6.8100e- 1 7.4000e- 7.5500e- • 0.0000 i 105.4147 1 105.4147 1 5.8500e- 1 0.0000 i 105.5610 •1 003 I 1 1 003 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 004 003 . 1 I 1 003 1 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 2.0700e- 1 1.5000e- 0.0157 1 5.0000e- 1 5.2600e- 1 3.0000e- 1 5.3000e- 1 1.4000e- 1 3.0000e- 1.4300e- • 0.0000 1 4.2102 1 4.2102 1 1.1000e- 1 0.0000 : 4.2129 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 : i I I 004 Total 0.0103 0.3093 0.0680 1.1400e- 0.0300 8.0000e- 0.0309 8.2100e- 7.7000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 109.6248 109.6248 5.9600e- 0.0000 109.7739 003 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 I Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 0.0139 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0139 I 1 1.5600e- 1 1 0.0000 : 1.5600e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 9 I I I I 1 1 I 003 I 003 . 1 I I I 'I 1 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 5.7400e- 0.1014 0.1895 1 3.1000e- 1 1 5.0000e- 1 5.0000e- 1 1 5.0000e- 5.0000e- i 0.0000 1 26.9238 1 26.9238 1 8.7100e- 0.0000 i 27.1415 •1 003 I 1 004 1 1 004 I 004 1 I 004 004 1 1 003 1 1 '1 1 1 : I 1 1 I 1 . 1 1 1 I 1 Total 5.7400e- 0.1014 0.1895 3.1000e- 0.0139 5.0000e- 0.0144 1.5600e- 5.0000e- 2.0600e- 0.0000 26.9238 26.9238 8.7100e- 0.0000 27.1415 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 8.2500e- 0.3078 0.0524 1.0900e- 0.0248 1 7.7000e- 1 0.0256 1 6.8100e- 1 7.4000e- 7.5500e- • 0.0000 i 105.4147 1 105.4147 5.8500e- 0.0000 i 105.5610 •1 003 I 1 1 003 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 004 003 . 1 I 1 003 1 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • 1 I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 2.0700e- 1.5000e- 0.0157 1 5.0000e- 1 5.2600e- 1 3.0000e- 5.3000e- 1 1.4000e- 3.0000e- 1.4300e- • 0.0000 1 4.2102 1 4.2102 1.1000e- 1 0.0000 : 4.2129 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 : i I I 004 Total 0.0103 0.3093 0.0680 1.1400e- 0.0300 8.0000e- 0.0309 8.2100e- 7.7000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 109.6248 109.6248 5.9600e- 0.0000 109.7739 003 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.0881 1 0.9112 1 1.2874 1 2.1400e- 1 1 0.0386 1 0.0386 1 0.0377 : 0.0377 • 0.0000 I 185.4550 1 185.4550 1 0.0310 1 0.0000 i 186.2294 '1 I I 1 003 I 1 1 I I ; I 1 I I 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0881 0.9112 1.2874 2.1400e- 0.0386 0.0386 0.0377 0.0377 0.0000 185.4550 185.4550 0.0310 0.0000 186.2294 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling 9i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ,1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 9.1900e- 0.3428 0.0682 9.8000e- 0.0235 1 5.2000e- 1 0.0240 1 6.7700e- 1 5.0000e- 7.2700e- • 0.0000 93.7047 1 93.7047 6.1500e- 0.0000 : 93.8584 •1 003 I I 1 004 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 004 003 . I 1 003 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.0801 0.0582 0.6078 1 1.8000e- 1 0.2039 1 1.2900e- 0.2052 1 0.0542 1.1900e- 0.0554 : 0.0000 163.1432 1 163.1432 4.2500e- 1 0.0000 : 163.2494 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 Total 0.0892 0.4009 0.6760 2.7800e- 0.2274 1.8100e- 0.2292 0.0609 1.6900e- 0.0626 0.0000 256.8479 256.8479 0.0104 0.0000 257.1079 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.0436 1 0.8708 1 1.4474 1 2.1400e- 1 1 8.9600e- 1 8.9600e- 1 1 8.9600e- : 8.9600e- • 0.0000 I 185.4548 1 185.4548 1 0.0310 1 0.0000 i 186.2291 '1 I I 1 003 1 I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I I 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0436 0.8708 1.4474 2.1400e- 8.9600e- 8.9600e- 8.9600e- 8.9600e- 0.0000 185.4548 185.4548 0.0310 0.0000 186.2291 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling 9i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 9.1900e- 0.3428 0.0682 9.8000e- 0.0235 1 5.2000e- 1 0.0240 1 6.7700e- 1 5.0000e- 7.2700e- • 0.0000 93.7047 1 93.7047 6.1500e- 0.0000 : 93.8584 •1 003 I I I 004 1 I 004 1 1 003 I 004 003 . I 1 003 1 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 •I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.0801 0.0582 0.6078 1 1.8000e- 1 0.2039 1 1.2900e- 0.2052 1 0.0542 1.1900e- 0.0554 � 0.0000 163.1432 1 163.1432 4.2500e- 1 0.0000 : 163.2494 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I 003 I 1 •I I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 Total 0.0892 0.4009 0.6760 2.7800e- 0.2274 1.8100e- 0.2292 0.0609 1.6900e- 0.0626 0.0000 256.8479 256.8479 0.0104 0.0000 257.1079 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.1379 1 1.4294 1 2.1566 1 3.5900e- 1 1 0.0566 1 0.0566 1 0.0552 : 0.0552 • 0.0000 1 311.0997 1 311.0997 1 0.0513 1 0.0000 ! 312.3832 '1 I I 1 003 I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1379 1.4294 2.1566 3.5900e- 0.0566 0.0566 0.0552 0.0552 0.0000 311.0997 311.0997 0.0513 0.0000 312.3832 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0116 0.4433 0.0987 1.6000e- 0.0393 1 4.3000e- 1 0.0398 1 0.0114 1 4.1000e- 0.0118 : 0.0000 152.8593 1 152.8593 8.2900e- 0.0000 : 153.0665 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.1258 0.0878 0.9345 1 2.9100e- 1 0.3421 1 2.1100e- 0.3442 0.0909 1 1.9400e- 0.0928 : 0.0000 I 263.3840 1 263.3840 6.3800e- 0.0000 : 263.5436 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 • 1 I 1 1 1 Total 0.1374 0.5311 1.0332 4.5100e- 0.3814 2.5400e- 0.3840 0.1022 2.3500e- 0.1046 0.0000 416.2433 416.2433 0.0147 0.0000 416.6101 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.0731 1 1.4607 1 2.4279 1 3.5900e- 1 1 0.0150 1 0.0150 1 0.0150 : 0.0150 • 0.0000 1 311.0993 1 311.0993 1 0.0513 1 0.0000 ! 312.3828 'I I I 1 003 I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0731 1.4607 2.4279 3.5900e- 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 311.0993 311.0993 0.0513 0.0000 312.3828 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0116 0.4433 0.0987 1.6000e- 0.0393 1 4.3000e- 1 0.0398 1 0.0114 1 4.1000e- 0.0118 : 0.0000 152.8593 1 152.8593 8.2900e- 0.0000 : 153.0665 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.1258 0.0878 0.9345 1 2.9100e- 1 0.3421 1 2.1100e- 0.3442 0.0909 1 1.9400e- 0.0928 : 0.0000 I 263.3840 1 263.3840 6.3800e- 0.0000 : 263.5436 '1 1 1 I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1'I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 • 1 I I 1 1 Total 0.1374 0.5311 1.0332 4.5100e- 0.3814 2.5400e- 0.3840 0.1022 2.3500e- 0.1046 0.0000 416.2433 416.2433 0.0147 0.0000 416.6101 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road • 0.0175 I 0.1829 I 0.2902 I 4.8000e- I I 6.7100e- I 6.7100e- I 1 6.5500e- : 6.5500e- • 0.0000 I 41.8762 1 41.8762 I 6.8300e- 1 0.0000 ! 42.0469 '1 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0175 0.1829 0.2902 4.8000e- 6.7100e- 6.7100e- 6.5500e- 6.5500e- 0.0000 41.8762 41.8762 6.8300e- 0.0000 42.0469 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J Vendor • 1.5400e- I 0.0600 1 0.0128 I 2.1000e- I 5.3000e- 1 6.0000e- I 5.3500e- I 1.5300e- I 6.0000e- 1.5800e- • 0.0000 20.5543 1 20.5543 I 1.1200e- 1 0.0000 : 20.5821 •I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.0160 0.0107 0.1171 1 3.8000e- 1 0.0461 1 2.8000e- 0.0463 1 0.0122 2.6000e- 0.0125 � 0.0000 I 34.3054 1 34.3054 7.8000e- 1 0.0000 : 34.3250 'I I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I I 004 I I 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0175 0.0707 0.1299 5.9000e- 0.0514 3.4000e- 0.0517 0.0138 3.2000e- 0.0141 0.0000 54.8597 54.8597 1.9000e- 0.0000 54.9072 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 9.8400e- I 0.1966 I 0.3268 I 4.8000e- I I 2.0200e- I 2.0200e- I 1 2.0200e- : 2.0200e- • 0.0000 I 41.8762 1 41.8762 I 6.8300e- 1 0.0000 ! 42.0469 9 003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 9.8400e- 0.1966 0.3268 4.8000e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 0.0000 41.8762 41.8762 6.8300e- 0.0000 42.0469 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J Vendor • 1.5400e- I 0.0600 1 0.0128 I 2.1000e- I 5.3000e- 1 6.0000e- I 5.3500e- I 1.5300e- I 6.0000e- 1.5800e- • 0.0000 20.5543 1 20.5543 I 1.1200e- 1 0.0000 : 20.5821 •I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.0160 0.0107 0.1171 1 3.8000e- 1 0.0461 1 2.8000e- 0.0463 1 0.0122 2.6000e- 0.0125 � 0.0000 I 34.3054 1 34.3054 7.8000e- 1 0.0000 : 34.3250 'I I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I I 004 I I 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0175 0.0707 0.1299 5.9000e- 0.0514 3.4000e- 0.0517 0.0138 3.2000e- 0.0141 0.0000 54.8597 54.8597 1.9000e- 0.0000 54.9072 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 0.0239 1 0.0000 1 0.0239 2.5800e- 1 0.0000 : 2.5800e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 9 I I I I I 1 I 003 I 003 , 1 I I I 'I 1 I I I I I I I • 1 I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0230 0.2670 0.1480 1 3.8000e- 1 1 0.0105 1 0.0105 1 1 9.6800e- 9.6800e- i 0.0000 1 33.7841 1 33.7841 1 0.0109 0.0000 i 34.0573 '1 I I I 004 I 1 I I I 003 003 . 1 1 I I 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.0230 0.2670 0.1480 3.8000e- 0.0239 0.0105 0.0344 2.5800e- 9.6800e- 0.0123 0.0000 33.7841 33.7841 0.0109 0.0000 34.0573 004 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 1.5500e- 1 1.1300e- 0.0118 1 3.0000e- 1 3.9500e- 1 2.0000e- 1 3.9700e- 1 1.0500e- 1 2.0000e- 1.0700e- • 0.0000 1 3.1576 1 3.1576 1 8.0000e- 1 0.0000 : 3.1597 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 1 005 003 : i I I 005 Total 1.5500e- 1.1300e- 0.0118 3.0000e- 3.9500e- 2.0000e- 3.9700e- 1.0500e- 2.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 3.1576 3.1576 8.0000e- 0.0000 3.1597 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust •i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.0239 1 0.0000 1 0.0239 1 2.5800e- 1 0.0000 : 2.5800e- •• 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 '1 I I I I I 1 I 003 I 003 . 1 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 f J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 6.5900e- 0.1098 0.2153 1 3.8000e- 1 1 6.3000e- 1 6.3000e- 1 1 6.3000e- 6.3000e- i 0.0000 1 33.7841 1 33.7841 1 0.0109 0.0000 i 34.0572 '1 003 I 1 1 004 1 1 004 I 004 1 I 004 004 1 1 I I 1 '1 I I I 1 1 1 I I . 1 I 1 1 1 Total 6.5900e- 0.1098 0.2153 3.8000e- 0.0239 6.3000e- 0.0245 2.5800e- 6.3000e- 3.2100e- 0.0000 33.7841 33.7841 0.0109 0.0000 34.0572 003 004 004 003 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 Worker •1 1.5500e- 1.1300e- 0.0118 1 3.0000e- 1 3.9500e- 1 2.0000e- 1 3.9700e- 1 1.0500e- 1 2.0000e- 1.0700e- • 0.0000 1 3.1576 1 3.1576 8.0000e- 0.0000 : 3.1597 • 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 1 005 003 : i I I 005 Total 1.5500e- 1.1300e- 0.0118 3.0000e- 3.9500e- 2.0000e- 3.9700e- 1.0500e- 2.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 3.1576 3.1576 8.0000e- 0.0000 3.1597 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust •i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.9600e- 1 0.0000 1 6.9600e- 1 7.8000e- 1 0.0000 : 7.8000e- •• 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ! 0.0000 9 I I I I 003 I I 003 I 004 I 004 ; 1 I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0113 0.1227 0.0724 1 1.5000e- 1 1 6.1300e- 1 6.1300e- 1 1 5.6400e- 5.6400e- i 0.0000 1 13.4619 1 13.4619 1 4.3500e- 0.0000 i 13.5708 'I I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I 1 9 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I 1 1 Total 0.0113 0.1227 0.0724 1.5000e- 6.9600e- 6.1300e- 0.0131 7.8000e- 5.6400e- 6.4200e- 0.0000 13.4619 13.4619 4.3500e- 0.0000 13.5708 004 003 003 004 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 4.1200e- 0.1539 0.0262 1 5.5000e- 0.0124 1 3.9000e- 1 0.0128 1 3.4000e- 1 3.7000e- 3.7700e- • 0.0000 i 52.7073 1 52.7073 2.9300e- 0.0000 i 52.7805 •I 003 I I 1 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . 1 I 1 003 I 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 9 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 Worker •1 1.0300e- 1 7.5000e- 1 7.8400e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6300e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6500e- 1 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- • 0.0000 1 2.1051 1 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 : 2.1064 •1 003 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 : i I I 005 Total 5.1500e- 0.1547 0.0340 5.7000e- 0.0150 4.1000e- 0.0154 4.1000e- 3.9000e- 4.4800e- 0.0000 54.8124 54.8124 2.9800e- 0.0000 54.8870 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 6.9600e- 1 0.0000 1 6.9600e- 1 7.8000e- 1 0.0000 : 7.8000e- • 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 9 I I I I 003 I I 003 I 004 I 004 ; 1 I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 2.8700e- 0.0507 0.0948 1 1.5000e- 1 1 2.5000e- 1 2.5000e- 1 1 2.5000e- 2.5000e- i 0.0000 1 13.4619 1 13.4619 1 4.3500e- 0.0000 i 13.5707 •1 003 I I 1 004 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 1 I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I 1 1 Total 2.8700e- 0.0507 0.0948 1.5000e- 6.9600e- 2.5000e- 7.2100e- 7.8000e- 2.5000e- 1.0300e- 0.0000 13.4619 13.4619 4.3500e- 0.0000 13.5707 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 Hauling •I 4.1200e- 0.1539 0.0262 1 5.5000e- 0.0124 1 3.9000e- 1 0.0128 1 3.4000e- 1 3.7000e- 3.7700e- • 0.0000 i 52.7073 1 52.7073 2.9300e- 0.0000 i 52.7805 •1 003 I I 1 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . 1 I 1 003 I 1 ;1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Worker •I 1.0300e- 1 7.5000e- 1 7.8400e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.6300e- 1 2.0000e- 2.6500e- 1 7.0000e- 2.0000e- 7.1000e- • 0.0000 1 2.1051 1 2.1051 5.0000e- 0.0000 : 2.1064 • 003 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 : i I I 005 Total 5.1500e- 0.1547 0.0340 5.7000e- 0.0150 4.1000e- 0.0154 4.1000e- 3.9000e- 4.4800e- 0.0000 54.8124 54.8124 2.9800e- 0.0000 54.8870 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 7.9500e- I 0.0794 I 0.1074 I 1.8000e- I I 3.5700e- I 3.5700e- I 1 3.5000e- : 3.5000e- • 0.0000 I 15.6237 1 15.6237 I 2.2500e- 1 0.0000 i 15.6799 •1 003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I I 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 7.9500e- 0.0794 0.1074 1.8000e- 3.5700e- 3.5700e- 3.5000e- 3.5000e- 0.0000 15.6237 15.6237 2.2500e- 0.0000 15.6799 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 •1 1 I I I I I I I • I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J Vendor •i 8.9000e- I 0.0332 1 6.6000e- I 9.0000e- I 2.2700e- 1 5.0000e- I 2.3200e- I 6.6000e- I 5.0000e- 1 7.0000e- • 0.0000 9.0682 1 9.0682 I 5.9000e- 1 0.0000 : 9.0831 9004 I I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 .004 I I 004 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J J J J Worker •i 7.7500e- I 5.6300e- 1 0.0588 1 1.7000e- I 0.0197 1 1.2000e- 1 0.0199 I 5.2400e- I 1.2000e- 1 5.3600e- • 0.0000 15.7881 1 15.7881 1 4.1000e- I 0.0000 : 15.7983 9003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 .003 I I 004 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 8.6400e- 0.0388 0.0654 2.6000e- 0.0220 1.7000e- 0.0222 5.9000e- 1.7000e- 6.0600e- 0.0000 24.8563 24.8563 1.0000e- 0.0000 24.8814 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 3.5700e- I 0.0694 I 0.1200 I 1.8000e- I I 2.6000e- I 2.6000e- I 1 2.6000e- : 2.6000e- • 0.0000 I 15.6237 1 15.6237 I 2.2500e- 1 0.0000 i 15.6799 •1 003 I I I 004 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 • 1 I I 003 I I '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 3.5700e- 0.0694 0.1200 1.8000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 0.0000 15.6237 15.6237 2.2500e- 0.0000 15.6799 003 004 004 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 •1 1 I I I I I I I • I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J Vendor •i 8.9000e- I 0.0332 1 6.6000e- I 9.0000e- I 2.2700e- 1 5.0000e- I 2.3200e- I 6.6000e- I 5.0000e- 1 7.0000e- • 0.0000 9.0682 1 9.0682 I 5.9000e- 1 0.0000 : 9.0831 9004 I I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 .004 I I 004 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J J J J Worker •i 7.7500e- I 5.6300e- 1 0.0588 1 1.7000e- I 0.0197 1 1.2000e- 1 0.0199 I 5.2400e- I 1.2000e- 1 5.3600e- • 0.0000 15.7881 1 15.7881 1 4.1000e- I 0.0000 : 15.7983 9003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 .003 I I 004 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 8.6400e- 0.0388 0.0654 2.6000e- 0.0220 1.7000e- 0.0222 5.9000e- 1.7000e- 6.0600e- 0.0000 24.8563 24.8563 1.0000e- 0.0000 24.8814 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.1284 1 1.2839 1 1.8585 1 3.1300e- 1 1 0.0540 1 0.0540 1 1 0.0529 : 0.0529 • 0.0000 I 270.8250 1 270.8250 1 0.0383 0.0000 ! 271.7829 'I I I 1 003 I I 1 I I ; I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.1284 1.2839 1.8585 3.1300e- 0.0540 0.0540 0.0529 0.0529 0.0000 270.8250 270.8250 0.0383 0.0000 271.7829 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0116 0.4433 0.0987 1.6000e- 0.0393 1 4.3000e- 1 0.0398 1 0.0114 1 4.1000e- 0.0118 : 0.0000 152.8593 1 152.8593 8.2900e- 0.0000 : 153.0665 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.1258 0.0878 0.9345 1 2.9100e- 1 0.3421 1 2.1100e- 0.3442 0.0909 1 1.9400e- 0.0928 : 0.0000 I 263.3840 1 263.3840 6.3800e- 0.0000 : 263.5436 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1374 0.5311 1.0332 4.5100e 0.3814 2.5400e- 0.3840 0.1022 2.3500e- 0.1046 0.0000 416.2433 416.2433 0.0147 0.0000 416.6101 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.0618 1 1.2030 1 2.0800 1 3.1300e- 1 1 4.5000e- 1 4.5000e- 1 1 4.5000e- : 4.5000e- • 0.0000 I 270.8247 1 270.8247 1 0.0383 0.0000 ! 271.7825 'I I I 1 003 1 I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0618 1.2030 2.0800 3.1300e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 270.8247 270.8247 0.0383 0.0000 271.7825 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0116 0.4433 0.0987 1.6000e- 0.0393 1 4.3000e- 1 0.0398 1 0.0114 1 4.1000e- 0.0118 : 0.0000 152.8593 1 152.8593 8.2900e- 0.0000 : 153.0665 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.1258 0.0878 0.9345 1 2.9100e- 1 0.3421 1 2.1100e- 0.3442 0.0909 1 1.9400e- 0.0928 : 0.0000 I 263.3840 1 263.3840 6.3800e- 0.0000 : 263.5436 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 • 1 I 1 I 1 Total 0.1374 0.5311 1.0332 4.5100e- 0.3814 2.5400e- 0.3840 0.1022 2.3500e- 0.1046 0.0000 416.2433 416.2433 0.0147 0.0000 416.6101 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.0233 1 0.2337 1 0.3572 1 6.0000e- 1 1 9.1100e- 1 9.1100e- 1 1 8.9100e- : 8.9100e- • 0.0000 I 52.0781 1 52.0781 1 7.2500e- 0.0000 i 52.2593 'I I I 1 004 1 I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I 003 I I 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0233 0.2337 0.3572 6.0000e- 9.1100e- 9.1100e- 8.9100e- 8.9100e- 0.0000 52.0781 52.0781 7.2500e- 0.0000 52.2593 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling -I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor •1 2.2100e- 0.0857 0.0183 1 3.1000e- 1 7.5700e- 1 8.0000e- 1 7.6500e- 1 2.1800e- 1 8.0000e- 2.2600e- • 0.0000 29.3632 1 29.3632 1.5900e- 0.0000 : 29.4031 •1 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.0228 0.0153 0.1673 5.4000e- 0.0658 1 4.0000e- 0.0662 1 0.0175 3.7000e- 0.0178 � 0.0000 I 49.0077 1 49.0077 1.1200e- 1 0.0000 : 49.0358 '1 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I I 003 I I 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0250 0.1010 0.1856 8.5000e- 0.0734 4.8000e- 0.0738 0.0197 4.5000e- 0.0201 0.0000 78.3710 78.3710 2.7100e- 0.0000 78.4388 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.0119 1 0.2314 1 0.4000 1 6.0000e- 1 1 8.6000e- 1 8.6000e- 1 1 8.6000e- : 8.6000e- • 0.0000 I 52.0780 1 52.0780 1 7.2500e- 0.0000 i 52.2592 '1 I I 1 004 1 I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 • 1 I I 003 I I '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0119 0.2314 0.4000 6.0000e- 8.6000e- 8.6000e- 8.6000e- 8.6000e- 0.0000 52.0780 52.0780 7.2500e- 0.0000 52.2592 004 004 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor •1 2.2100e- 0.0857 0.0183 1 3.1000e- 1 7.5700e- 1 8.0000e- 1 7.6500e- 1 2.1800e- 1 8.0000e- 2.2600e- • 0.0000 29.3632 1 29.3632 1.5900e- 0.0000 : 29.4031 •1 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker .1 0.0228 0.0153 0.1673 5.4000e- 0.0658 1 4.0000e- 0.0662 1 0.0175 3.7000e- 0.0178 • 0.0000 I 49.0077 1 49.0077 1.1200e- 1 0.0000 49.0358 '1 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 . I I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 Total 0.0250 0.1010 0.1856 8.5000e- 0.0734 4.8000e- 0.0738 0.0197 4.5000e- 0.0201 0.0000 78.3710 78.3710 2.7100e- 0.0000 78.4388 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I Off-Road 4 0.0558 1 0.5504 1 0.7876 1 1 1.2300e- 1 1 1 0.0276 1 1 0.0276 1 1 1 1 0.0254 : 0.0254 : 0.0000 I 108.1451 1 1 108.1451 1 1 0.0350 1 1 0.0000 i 109.0195 'I I I 1 003 I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ; J J J J J J J J • I J J J t I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Paving .1 2.3600e- I I 1 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 •I 003 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0581 0.5504 0.7876 1.2300e- 0.0276 0.0276 0.0254 0.0254 0.0000 108.1451 108.1451 0.0350 0.0000 109.0195 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling 9i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 4.0300e- 0.1535 0.0342 5.5000e- 0.0136 1 1.5000e- 1 0.0138 1 3.9300e- 1 1.4000e- 4.0700e- • 0.0000 52.9128 1 52.9128 2.8700e- 0.0000 : 52.9846 •I 003 I I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 •1 J J J J J J J J • J J J Worker • 8.7100e- I 6.0800e- 1 0.0647 I 2.0000e- I 0.0237 1 1.5000e- 1 0.0238 I 6.2900e- I 1.3000e- 1 6.4200e- • 0.0000 18.2343 1 18.2343 1 4.4000e- I 0.0000 : 18.2453 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . I I 004 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 0.0127 0.1595 0.0989 7.5000e- 0.0373 3.0000e- 0.0376 0.0102 2.7000e- 0.0105 0.0000 71.1471 71.1471 3.3100e- 0.0000 71.2299 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I Off-Road 4 0.0180 1 0.5421 1 0.9340 1 1 1.2300e- 1 1 1 2.0200e- 1 1 2.0200e- I 1 1 1 2.0200e- : 2.0200e- • 0.0000 I 108.1450 1 1 108.1450 1 1 0.0350 1 1 0.0000 i 109.0194 •I I I I 003 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ; J J J J J J J J • I J J J t I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Paving .1 2.3600e- I I 1 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 •1 003 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0204 0.5421 0.9340 1.2300e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 2.0200e- 0.0000 108.1450 108.1450 0.0350 0.0000 109.0194 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling 9i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I •I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 4.0300e- 0.1535 0.0342 5.5000e- 0.0136 1 1.5000e- 1 0.0138 1 3.9300e- 1 1.4000e- 4.0700e- • 0.0000 52.9128 1 52.9128 2.8700e- 0.0000 : 52.9846 •1 003 I I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 .003 I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 •1 J J J J J J J J J J J Worker • 8.7100e- I 6.0800e- 1 0.0647 I 2.0000e- I 0.0237 1 1.5000e- 1 0.0238 I 6.2900e- I 1.3000e- 1 6.4200e- • 0.0000 18.2343 1 18.2343 1 4.4000e- I 0.0000 : 18.2453 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . I I 004 I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 0.0127 0.1595 0.0989 7.5000e- 0.0373 3.0000e- 0.0376 0.0102 2.7000e- 0.0105 0.0000 71.1471 71.1471 3.3100e- 0.0000 71.2299 004 004 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 1.1789 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0460 0.3127 0.4347 1 7.1000e- 1 1 0.0170 1 0.0170 1 1 0.0170 0.0170 : 0.0000 1 61.2781 1 61.2781 1 3.6700e- 0.0000 i 61.3697 'I I I I 004 I I I I I . I I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I 1 1 I I . I 1 1 1 1 Total 1.2249 0.3127 0.4347 7.1000e- 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0000 61.2781 61.2781 3.6700e- 0.0000 61.3697 004 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Worker •1 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0158 1 1.0000e- 0.0159 1 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- • 0.0000 1 12.1562 1 12.1562 2.9000e- 1 0.0000 : 12.1636 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 005 003 . I I 1 004 I 1 'I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 Total 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1.3000e- 0.0158 1.0000e- 0.0159 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- 0.0000 12.1562 12.1562 2.9000e- 0.0000 12.1636 003 003 004 004 003 005 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 1.1789 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0460 0.3127 0.4347 1 7.1000e- 1 1 0.0170 1 0.0170 1 1 0.0170 0.0170 : 0.0000 1 61.2780 1 61.2780 1 3.6700e- 0.0000 i 61.3697 'I I I I 004 I I I I I . I 1 I 003 I 1 'I I I I I 1 1 I I . I I 1 1 1 Total 1.2249 0.3127 0.4347 7.1000e- 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0000 61.2780 61.2780 3.6700e- 0.0000 61.3697 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Worker •1 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0158 1 1.0000e- 0.0159 1 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- • 0.0000 1 12.1562 1 12.1562 2.9000e- 1 0.0000 : 12.1636 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 005 003 . I I 1 004 I 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1.3000e- 0.0158 1.0000e- 0.0159 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- 0.0000 12.1562 12.1562 2.9000e- 0.0000 12.1636 003 003 004 004 003 005 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I Off-Road 4 0.0496 1 0.4892 1 0.7000 1 1 1.0900e- 1 1 1 0.0245 1 1 0.0245 I 1 1 1 0.0225 : 0.0225 : 0.0000 1 96.1290 1 1 96.1290 1 1 0.0311 I 1 0.0000 i 96.9062 '1 I I 1 003 I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ; J J J J J J J J • I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Paving •I 2.3600e- 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •I 003 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0519 0.4892 0.7000 1.0900e- 0.0245 0.0245 0.0225 0.0225 0.0000 96.1290 96.1290 0.0311 0.0000 96.9062 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 9 3.5800e- 0.1364 1 0.0304 4.9000e- 1 0.0121 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0122 1 3.4900e- 1 1.3000e- 3.6200e- • 0.0000 47.0336 1 47.0336 2.5500e- 0.0000 : 47.0974 •I 003 I I I 004 1 I 004 1 1 003 I 004 003 . I 1 003 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J • J J J 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Worker 9 7.7400e- 5.4000e- 1 0.0575 1 1.8000e- 1 0.0211 1 1.3000e- 0.0212 1 5.5900e- 1 1.2000e- 5.7100e- • 0.0000 I 16.2083 1 16.2083 3.9000e- 0.0000 : 16.2181 •I 003 I 003 I I 004 1 I 004 1 I 003 I 004 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 I 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 Total 0.0113 0.1418 0.0879 6.7000e- 0.0332 2.6000e- 0.0334 9.0800e- 2.5000e- 9.3300e- 0.0000 63.2419 63.2419 2.9400e- 0.0000 63.3155 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I Off-Road 4 0.0160 1 0.4819 1 0.8302 1 1 1.0900e- 1 1 1 1.8000e- 1 1 1.8000e- I 1 1 1 1.8000e- : 1.8000e- • 0.0000 1 96.1288 1 1 96.1288 1 1 0.0311 I 1 0.0000 i 96.9061 •I I I I 003 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 • 1 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ; J J J J J J J J • I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving •1 2.3600e- 1 1 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •I 003 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0184 0.4819 0.8302 1.0900e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 96.1288 96.1288 0.0311 0.0000 96.9061 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Vendor 91 3.5800e- 0.1364 1 0.0304 4.9000e- 1 0.0121 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0122 1 3.4900e- 1 1.3000e- 3.6200e- • 0.0000 47.0336 1 47.0336 2.5500e- 0.0000 : 47.0974 •1 003 I I 1 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J • J J J 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Worker 91 7.7400e- 5.4000e- 1 0.0575 1 1.8000e- 1 0.0211 1 1.3000e- 0.0212 1 5.5900e- 1 1.2000e- 5.7100e- • 0.0000 I 16.2083 1 16.2083 3.9000e- 0.0000 : 16.2181 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 . 1 I 1 004 I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 Total 0.0113 0.1418 0.0879 6.7000e- 0.0332 2.6000e- 0.0334 9.0800e- 2.5000e- 9.3300e- 0.0000 63.2419 63.2419 2.9400e- 0.0000 63.3155 004 004 003 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 1.1789 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0460 0.3127 0.4347 1 7.1000e- 1 1 0.0170 1 0.0170 1 1 0.0170 0.0170 : 0.0000 1 61.2781 1 61.2781 1 3.6700e- 0.0000 i 61.3697 'I I I I 004 I I I I I . I I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I 1 1 I I . I 1 1 1 1 Total 1.2249 0.3127 0.4347 7.1000e- 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0000 61.2781 61.2781 3.6700e- 0.0000 61.3697 004 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Worker •1 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0158 1 1.0000e- 0.0159 1 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- • 0.0000 1 12.1562 1 12.1562 2.9000e- 1 0.0000 : 12.1636 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 005 003 . I I 1 004 I 1 'I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 Total 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1.3000e- 0.0158 1.0000e- 0.0159 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- 0.0000 12.1562 12.1562 2.9000e- 0.0000 12.1636 003 003 004 004 003 005 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 1.1789 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.0460 0.3127 0.4347 1 7.1000e- 1 1 0.0170 1 0.0170 1 1 0.0170 0.0170 : 0.0000 1 61.2780 1 61.2780 1 3.6700e- 0.0000 i 61.3697 'I I I I 004 I I I I I . I 1 I 003 I 1 'I I I I I 1 1 I I . I I 1 1 1 Total 1.2249 0.3127 0.4347 7.1000e- 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0170 0.0000 61.2780 61.2780 3.6700e- 0.0000 61.3697 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Worker •1 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0158 1 1.0000e- 0.0159 1 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- • 0.0000 1 12.1562 1 12.1562 2.9000e- 0.0000 : 12.1636 •1 003 I 003 I I 004 I I 004 I I 003 I 005 003 . I I 1 004 I 1 'I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 Total 5.8100e- 4.0500e- 0.0431 1.3000e- 0.0158 1.0000e- 0.0159 4.1900e- 9.0000e- 4.2800e- 0.0000 12.1562 12.1562 2.9000e- 0.0000 12.1636 003 003 004 004 003 005 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated �� 0.4302 i 2.9752 i 5.6448 : 0.0255 i 2.0948 : 0.0155 : 2.1103 i 0.5614 : 0.0144 0.5758 : 0.0000 2,368.464 1 2,368.464: 0.1061 i 0.0000 i 2,371.116 I I I I 1 1 I I . 1 I 1 I I 1 7 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 I 1 �4 } 4. } } 4. } 4. } * } } } 1- Unmitigated . 0.4302 . 2.9752 . 5.6448 • 0.0255 . 2.0948 • 0.0155 • 2.1103 . 0.5614 • 0.0144 . 0.5758 • 0.0000 2,368.464•2,368.464• 0.1061 . 0.0000 •2,371.116 1 1 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise + 1,419.32 1,419.32 1419.32 • 5,197,323 • 5,197,323 City Park + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 t Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 T Y General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall + 83.16 ; 83.16 83.16 • 304,501 304,501 Total I 1,502.48 I 1,502.48 1,502.48 I 5,501,824 I 5,501,824 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 49 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.06 10.06 1 10.06 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.06 • 10.06 10.06 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 1: 0.014289 1: 0.004794 i 0.018611 1: 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 1: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 I I I I I I I I I 1 I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Install High Efficiency Lighting CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I Electricity •1 I 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 527.3533 527.3533 1 0.0244 1 5.0400e- i 529.4653 Mitigated .: I I I I I I I I . I I I I 003 1 .1 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 J J J J J J J J •• J J J I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I Electricity 9 I 1 1 1 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 527.3533 1 527.3533 1 0.0244 1 5.0400e- : 529.4653 Unmitigated .: I I I I I I I I . I I I 003 1 .1 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 J J J J J J J J •• J J J I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I NaturalGas 9 0.0209 1 0.1788 1 0.0766 1 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 1 0.0145 1 1 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 1 206.9956 1 206.9956 1 3.9700e- 1 3.7900e- : 208.2257 Mitigated ;i I I I 003 I I I I I • I 1 I 003 I 003 1 1 I I I I I I I ' 1 I 1 1 I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.0209 • 0.1788 • 0.0766 • 1.1400e- • • 0.0145 • 0.0145 • • 0.0145 • 0.0145 • 0.0000 • 206.9956 • 206.9956 • 3.9700e- • 3.7900e- • 208.2257 Unmitigated 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid 13.83167e•i 0.0207 1 0.1766 I 0.0751 1 1.1300e- 1 1 0.0143 1 0.0143 1 1 0.0143 ; 0.0143 • 0.0000 1 204.4723 1204.4723 1 3.9200e- 1 3.7500e- I 205.6874 Rise +006 ;: 003 I I i i I 003 003 ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I City Park 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I 1 I I 1 ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 22663.5 •1 1.2000e- 1 1.0400e- 4.4000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 8.0000e- 1 8.0000e- 1 18.0000e- ; 8.0000e- I 0.0000 1 1.2094 1 1.2094 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- i 1.2166 e I '1 004 I 003 1 004 I 005 I I 005 I 005 I I 005 005 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I • I I I 005 I 005 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I • I 1 I I 1 'I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 , I 1 1 1 1 -9 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 19213.4 •1 1.0000e- 1 9.4000e- 7.9000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 7.0000e- 1 7.0000e- 1 17.000Oe- 7.0000e- I 0.0000 1 1.0253 1 1.0253 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- : 1.0314 Building i :: 004 004 I 004 005 I I 005 I 005 I 005 005 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I • 1 I 005 005 =1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 i ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall I 5407.92 •1 3.0000e- 1 2.7000e- 2.2000e- 1 0.0000 1 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- 12.0000e- 2.0000e- • 0.0000 1 0.2886 1 0.2886 1 1.0000e- 1 1.0000e- I 0.2903 :1 005 I 004 I 004 I I 005 I 005 I I 005 005 1 I I 005 I 005 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.0209 0.1788 0.0766 1.1500e- 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 206.9956 206.9956 3.9700e- 3.8000e- 208.2257 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid 13.83167e•i 0.0207 1 0.1766 1 0.0751 1 1.1300e- 1 1 0.0143 1 0.0143 1 1 0.0143 ; 0.0143 • 0.0000 1 204.4723 1 204.4723 1 3.9200e- 1 3.7500e- I 205.6874 Rise I +006 ;: 003 I I I I i I I 003 I 003 i i ?1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I City Park 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 i ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 22663.5 •1 1.2000e- 1 1.0400e- 4.4000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 8.0000e- 1 8.0000e- 1 1 8.0000e- ; 8.0000e- I 0.0000 1 1.2094 1 1.2094 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- i 1.2166 e I '1 004 I 003 1 004 I 005 I I 005 I 005 I I 005 005 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I • 1 I I 005 I 005 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I • I 1 I I 1 1 'I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 , I 1 1 1 1 -9 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 19213.4 •1 1.0000e- 1 9.4000e- 7.9000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 7.0000e- 1 7.0000e- 1 1 7.0000e- 7.0000e- I 0.0000 1 1.0253 1 1.0253 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- : 1.0314 Building i .: 004 1 004 1 004 1 005 I I 005 I 005 I I 005 005 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I • 1 I 005 005 =1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 i ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall I 5407.92 •1 3.0000e- 1 2.7000e- 2.2000e- 1 0.0000 1 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- 1 2.0000e- 2.0000e- • 0.0000 1 0.2886 1 0.2886 1 1.0000e- 1 1.0000e- I 0.2903 :I 005 I 004 I 004 I I 005 I 005 I I 005 005 1 I I 005 I 005 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0209 0.1788 0.0766 1.1500e- 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 206.9956 206.9956 3.9700e- 3.8000e- 208.2257 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid i 1.02564e•1 291.9232 i 0.0135 : 2.7900e- : 293.0923 Rise i +006 :: I 003 -9 J J City Park i 0 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 -9 J J -r Condo/Townhous i 4973.76 •1 1.4157 i 7.0000e- : 1.0000e- i 1.4213 e I :1 005 I 005 it J J Enclosed Parking : 713728 .1 203.1446 i 9.3900e- I 1.9400e- : 203.9582 with Elevator I :1 1 003 : 003 it J J General Office i 50885 .1 14.4831 i 6.7000e- : 1.4000e- : 14.5411 Building i :1 i 004 : 004 i it J J Parking Lot : 28000 •i 7.9695 i 3.7000e- : 8.0000e- : 8.0014 1 :1 : 004 : 005 41 J J Recreational i 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I :1 41 J J Strip Mall I 29573 •1 8.4172 i 3.9000e- : 8.0000e- 1 8.4509 •1 I 004 I 005 i Total 527.3533 0.0244 5.0400e- 529.4653 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid i 1.02564e•1 291.9232 i 0.0135 : 2.7900e- : 293.0923 Rise i +006 :: I 003 -9 J J City Park i 0 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 -9 J J -r Condo/Townhous i 4973.76 •1 1.4157 i 7.0000e- : 1.0000e- i 1.4213 e I :1 005 I 005 it J J Enclosed Parking : 713728 .1 203.1446 i 9.3900e- I 1.9400e- : 203.9582 with Elevator I :1 1 003 : 003 41 J J General Office i 50885 .1 14.4831 i 6.7000e- I 1.4000e- : 14.5411 Building i :1 i 004 : 004 i it J J Parking Lot : 28000 •i 7.9695 i 3.7000e- I 8.0000e- : 8.0014 1 :1 : 004 : 005 it J J Recreational i 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I •: 41 J J Strip Mall : 29573 .1 8.4172 i 3.9000e- : 8.0000e- 1 8.4509 :1 004 1 005 Total 527.3533 0.0244 5.0400e- 529.4653 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.5321 i 0.0768 i 2.7065 i 4.3000e- i i 0.0186 i 0.0186 i : 0.0186 � 0.0186 : 0.0000 i 57.4636 : 57.4636 i 5.2500e- i 9.7000e- i 57.8849 •� I I I 004 I I I I I . I I 003 I 004 1 '1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 :1- } } } } } } } } r } } } Unmitigated • 1.5321 • 0.0768 • 2.7065 • 4.3000e- . • 0.0186 • 0.0186 • . 0.0186 • 0.0186 • 0.0000 • 57.4636 • 57.4636 • 5.2500e- • 9.7000e- • 57.8849 004 003 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.1179 i i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 Coating :� ,i I I I I I I 1 I I I I Consumer .1 1.3276 i i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 I▪ 0.0000 Products I I I '� 1 I I I I I I I ei i , I I 1 'I I Hearth •1 5.3600e- i 0.0458 1 0.0195 i 2.9000e- i : 3.7000e- i 3.7000e- : i 3.7000e- 3.7000e- • 0.0000 53.0703 : 53.0703 i 1.0200e- 1 9.7000e- 1▪ 53.3857 " 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 004 i 'I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 Landscaping .1 0.0812 i 0.0309 1 2.6870 i 1.4000e- i 1 0.0149 i 0.0149 1 i 0.0149 0.0149 • 0.0000 4.3932 1 4.3932 i 4.2400e- 1 0.0000 I▪ 4.4992 1 •I I I I 004 I I I I I I I 003 1 Total 1.5321 0.0768 2.7065 4.3000e- 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 57.4636 57.4636 5.2600e- 9.7000e- 57.8849 004 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 Architectural •i 0.1179 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 .. 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating :: I I I I I I I I • I I I I e J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Consumer .1 1.3276 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Products :1 I I I I I I I • I I I '� J J J J J I 1 I I 1 1 1 J J •• I 1 �1 J 7 J J J Hearth .1 5.3600e- i 0.0458 : 0.0195 i 2.9000e- i 1 3.7000e- i 3.7000e- : i 3.7000e- 3.7000e- I 0.0000 i 53.0703 : 53.0703 i 1.0200e- 1 9.7000e- i 53.3857 • 003 004 003 003 003 003I .� i I i i I i I • i I 003 004 f J J J J J J J J 4 J J J Landscaping .1 0.0812 i 0.0309 : 2.6870 i 1.4000e- i : 0.0149 i 0.0149 : i 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 i 4.3932 : 4.3932 i 4.2400e- : 0.0000 i� 4.4992 9 i 1 004 1 1 I 1 i i 1 1 003 1 Total 1.5321 0.0768 2.7065 4.3000e- 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 57.4636 57.4636 5.2600e- 9.7000e- 57.8849 004 003 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Use Water Efficient Irrigation System CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •i 133.1252 0.8146 0.0203 i 159.5371 Unmitigated •• 145.1625 : 0.8951 • 0.0223 : 174.1820 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal 1 MT/yr Apartments Mid 1 24.2954/ •i 131.3899 1 0.7974 : 0.0199 i 157.2473 Rise i 10.6385 :: J J City Park I 0/ •1 1.2433 1 6.0000e- : 1.0000e- 1 1.2483 0.393189:: I 005 I 005 i J J Condo/Townhous 1 0/ •1 i 0.1299 1 1.0000e- 1 0.0000 0.1304 e 10.0410754:i I 005 I f -II J J Enclosed Parking I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 with Elevator I •: 1 1 I- -IJ J General Office I 0/0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 Building i •: 1 1 t 41 J J Parking Lot I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 J J Recreational I 0/ •1 0.4104 1 2.0000e- 1 0.0000 I 0.4120 Swimming Pool i 0.129772 :i I 005 I 1 I- -rl J J Strip Mall 12.97986/ •1 11.9890 1 0.0976 1 2.4000e- I 15.1440 j 0 •: 1il i I 003 Total 145.1625 0.8951 0.0223 174.1820 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid 122.1088/ •i 120.5404 1 0.7257 : 0.0181 i 144.0746 Rise I 9.98957 :: 1 I- -II City Park I 0/ •i 1.1675 1 5.0000e- : 1.0000e- I 1.1722 0.369204:: I 005 I 005 J J Condo/Townhous I 0/ •1 0.1220 1 1.0000e- 1 0.0000 i 0.1225 e 10.0385698:1 I 005 i .1 J J Enclosed Parking I 0/0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 with Elevator I •: 1 1 I- 4I General Office I 0/0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 Building i •: 1 1 t 41 J J Parking Lot I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 J J Recreational I 0/ •1 0.3853 1 2.0000e- 1 0.0000 I 0.3869 Swimming Pool i 0.121855;i I 005 I 1 I- 4I Strip Mall 12.71167/ •1 10.9100 1 0.0888 1 2.1800e- I 13.7810 j 0 •: 1il i I 003 Total 133.1251 0.8146 0.0203 159.5371 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 125.2962 i 7.4048 0.0000 i 310.4160 Unmitigated •• 125.2962 : 7.4048 • 0.0000 : 310.4160 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 61 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid : 584 •i 118.5467 1 7.0059 : 0.0000 1293.6945 Rise I •1 i 1 1 J J City Park i 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 J J Condo/Townhous i 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 e j •: i I j J J Enclosed Parking : 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I •1 1 1 I- -1 General Office i 5.15 •i 1.0454 1 0.0618 1 0.0000 i 2.5899 Building i •: I- - Parking Lot : 0 :: 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 J J Recreational i 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Swimming Pool I •1 I- 41 J J Strip Mall i 28.1 :: 5.7041 1 0.3371 1 0.0000 i 14.1315 i •' t 1 i Total 125.2962 7.4048 0.0000 310.4160 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 62 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid : 584 •i 118.5467 1 7.0059 : 0.0000 1293.6945 Rise I •1 i 1 1 J J City Park : 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 J J Condo/Townhous i 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 e j •: i I j J J Enclosed Parking : 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I •1 1 1 t 41 General Office i 5.15 •i 1.0454 1 0.0618 1 0.0000 i 2.5899 Building i •: I- - Parking Lot : 0 :: 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 J J Recreational i 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Swimming Pool I •1 I- -el J J Strip Mall i 28.1 •: 5.7041 1 0.3371 : 0.0000 i 14.1315 i •' t 1 i Total il 125.2962 7.4048 0.0000 310.4160 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 63 of 63 Date: 3/15/2022 1:26 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 5.54 + 1000sgft ; 0.13 5,537.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 328.00 + Space ; 0.00 131,200.00 + 0 Parking Lot 200.00 + Space ; 1.80 80,000.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,375.00 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.58 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 3,572.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 354,053.00 + 785 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 r f I. Strip Mall 2.44 1000sgft 0.00 2,436.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 627.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Land Use- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Residential Land Use Size" and "Underestimated Parking Land Use Size" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Construction Phase- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values." Energy Use - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Solid Waste- See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates" Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Final Mitigation" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation" Fleet Mix- See SWAPE comment regarding "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix." CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 6.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 3.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim I. tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change 7 Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 540.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 390.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 18.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 96.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 108.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 772.17 164.47 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer tblEnergyUse T24E • 845.95 177.65 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.92 3.50 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.07 2.74 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 4.58 4.09 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 25.90 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 0.10 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 21,180.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 10,590.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 5,540.00 5,537.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 14,374.80 14,375.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 3,580.00 3,572.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 259,000.00 354,053.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 1,000.00 1,570.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 2,440.00 2,436.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 2.95 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.08 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 6.82 3.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r . tblLandUse Population i 741.00 785.00 r . tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 r • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 2.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r . tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 627.49 r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 584.00 f r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 0.03 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.46 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer tblSolidWaste • SolidWasteGenerationRate • 20.41 0.00 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 2.56 28.10 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.06 tblVehicleTrips HOTTP 40.60 • 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP • 40.60 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL } 5.90 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HSTTP i 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP } 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PRTP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 34.08 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 1.05 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 34.08 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 6.65 5.48 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 1.89 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 5.81 0.00 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 33.82 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 44.32 34.08 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 24,295,400.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 65,154.03 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 984,644.96 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 211,732.46 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 180,736.95 2,979,860.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 603,492.07 0.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 110,774.26 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 •i 4.7327 i 59.6883 1 42.3262 i 0.1768 : 6.1991 1.6062 i 7.7232 1.4906 i 1.5014 2.9188 0.0000 i 18,123.89: 18,123.89 i 1.8419 : 0.0000 i 18,169.43 1 9 I I I 1 I 1 I • 9 1 I I i i 44 i 44 i I 1 54 e J J J J J J J J .e. I J J J 2023 9 39.1642 i 50.3281 : 74.0071 i 0.1791 : 6.3900 1.7727 i 8.1627 1.7179 i 1.6725 3.3903 : 0.0000 i 17,790.37: 17,790.37 i 2.4052 : 0.0000 : 17,850.50 9 I I I I I : . 77 : 77 : I 1 86 9 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 �1 J J J J J J J J l J J J 2024 9 3.4245 i 23.1138 : 39.8750 i 0.1032 : 4.9834 0.6556 i 5.6390 1.3333 i 0.6388 1.9721 : 0.0000 i 10,232.76: 10,232.76 i 0.8277 : 0.0000 1 10,253.45 9 I I I I I : . 1 29 : 29 : I I 61 9 I I I 1 I I I I . I Maximum 39.1642 59.6883 74.0071 0.1791 6.3900 1.7727 8.1627 1.7179 1.6725 3.3903 0.0000 18,123.89 18,123.89 2.4052 0.0000 18,169.43 11 44 44 54 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 •i 2.9559 1 47.2500 1 49.2839 1 0.1768 1 6.1991 1 0.2245 1 6.4236 1 1.4906 1 0.2202 1.7107 • 0.0000 18,123.89 1 18,123.89 1 1.8419 1 0.0000 i 18,169.43 9 I I II I I II I II ■ 44 I 44 I II 1 54 •� I I I I I I I I • 1 J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2023 9 37.6236 i 49.7057 : 82.5893 i 0.1791 : 6.3900 : 0.6753 i 6.8091 : 1.7179 i 0.6724 2.3166 .. 0.0000 17,790.37: 17,790.37 i 2.4052 : 0.0000 1 17,850.50 9 I I I I I I I I ■ 77 I 77 I I 1 86 9I I I I I I I I • I I I 9 J J J J J J J J J J J1. 2024 •i i 2.6794 i 23.6887 : 43.0478 i 0.1032 : 4.9834 : 0.1574 i 5.1408 : 1.3333 i 0.1550 1.4883 .. 0.0000 10,232.76: 10,232.76 i 0.8277 : 0.0000 i 10,253.45 9 I I I I I I I I ■ 29 I 29 I I 1 61 9I I I I I I I I • I I I Maximum 37.6236 49.7057 82.5893 0.1791 6.3900 0.6753 6.8091 1.7179 0.6724 2.3166 0.0000 18,123.89 18,123.89 2.4052 0.0000 18,169.43 44 44 54 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 8.59 9.38 -11.98 0.00 0.00 73.80 14.64 0.00 72.52 33.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •1 8.9995 1 3.9135 1 23.0563 1 0.0245 1 1 0.4154 0.4154 1 i 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 i 4,718.741 1 4,718.741 0.1271 1 0.0858 i 4,747.486 '1 I I I I I i I I . I 8 I 8 i I i 8 Energy •1 0.1146 1 0.9798 1 0.4197 1 6.2500e- 1 1 0.0792 i 0.0792 1 1 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.266 1 1,250.266 i 0.0240 1 0.0229 : 1,257.696 .1 I I 1 003 1 I I I 4 1 4 1 I i 1 Mobile •1 2.7755 1 15.9763 1 34.5375 1 0.1489 1 11.7290 1 0.0849 i 11.8139 1 3.1381 1 0.0791 3.2172 • i 15,215.46 1 15,215.46 i 0.6462 1 1 15,231.61 •1 . : 29 : 29 1 i i 82 Total 11.8896 20.8696 58.0135 0.1797 11.7290 0.5795 12.3085 3.1381 0.5737 3.7118 0.0000 21,184.47 21,184.47 0.7972 0.1087 21,236.80 10 10 12 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •1 8.9995 1 3.9135 1 23.0563 1 0.0245 1 1 0.4154 1 0.4154 i i 0.4154 0.4154 : 0.0000 4,718.741 i 4,718.741 1 0.1271 I 0.0858 i 4,747.486 '1 I I I I I I I I . 8 I 8 I I i 8 I I I I I I I II I I Energy .i 0.1146 1 0.9798 0.4197 1 6.2500e- 0.0792 1 0.0792 1 0.0792 0.0792 • 1,250.266 1,250.266 1 0.0240 0.0229 i 1,257.696 •1 I I I 003 1 I I I I ■ 4 I 4 I I 1 1 I I I I I II v J J J 1. Mobile 9 2.7755 1 15.9763 1 34.5375 1 0.1489 I 11.7290 1 0.0849 1 11.8139 1 3.1381 1 0.0791 3.2172 • 15,215.46 1 15,215.46 1 0.6462 I 1 15,231.61 •▪1 I I I I I I I I I ■ 29 I 29 I I i 82 Total 11.8896 20.8696 58.0135 0.1797 11.7290 0.5795 12.3085 3.1381 0.5737 3.7118 ( 0.0000 21,11804.47 21,11804.47 0.7972 0.1087 21,236.80 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 -Demolition :Demolition !3/5/2022 13/18/2022 l 6: 12: i r i -I , 2 -Site Preparation :Grading !4/4/2022 :4/30/2022 1 61 247 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 3 -Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Site Preparation 15/2/2022 :5/28/2022 1 61 247 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 4 -Construction-East Building :Building Construction 15/30/2022 :2/17/2024 1 61 5407 + I 1 1 5 -Grading :Grading !11/7/2022 i11/26/2022 1 61 187 i r i , -I , 6 -Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation !11/28/2022 112/10/2022 1 61 127 i r i , -I 7 -Construction-West Building :Building Construction !12/12/2022 :3/9/2024 1 61 390: i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 8 -Paving-East Building :Paving 15/8/2023 :9/9/2023 1 61 1087 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 9 -Architectural Coatings-East Bldg :Architectural Coating 15/8/2023 :7/29/2023 1 61 727 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 10 -Paving-West Building :Paving !8/7/2023 i 11/25/2023 : 61 96: • r r t -r r--•• 1.- 1 1 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:Architectural Coating .9/11/2023 .12/2/2023 6. 72: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 720,137; Residential Outdoor: 240,046; Non-Residential Indoor: 11,960; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,987; Striped Parking Area: 12,672 (Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.001 81: 0.73 ; Demolition :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158' 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 2 4.001 84' 0.74 y ; Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212' 0.43 y ; Site Preparation :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Graders ; 1 8.001 187' 0.41 y ; Site Preparation :Rollers ; 2 8.001 80' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.001 367: 0.48 y ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212: 0.43 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.001 78' 0.50 y ; Construction-East Building :Aerial Lifts ; 2 7.001 63' 0.31 y ; Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 0 7.001 231' 0.29 y ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.001 89' 0.20 1 y _ Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84' 0.74 y ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100' 0.40 .1. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.001 97' 0.37 y ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.001 46' 0.45 .1. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212' 0.43 .1. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158: 0.38 * r Grading :Graders 1' 8.00: 187' 0.41 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • Grading •Rollers 2• 8.00• 80• 0.38 Grading [Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247' 0.40 • y i Grading [Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247• 0.40 i J. i Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 • J. i Construction-West Building [Cranes ; 0 7.00 231' 0.29 J. ; Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84• 0.74 • J. i Construction-West Building [Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100• 0.40 • J. i Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. i Paving-East Building [Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 J. ; Paving-East Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.00 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Architectural Coatings-East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 5 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 i J. i Paving-West Building [Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 5• 8.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 5; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 6; 40.00i 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Cnc,+Q..;Irl;n., , I I , Construction 'East i 6; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I T Grading 6; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix HHDTe I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 1,440.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT \4/.,n+Q..;1,1 n., I I , I Construction-West i 4; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I , Architectural Coatings y 5; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT Cnn+Q1.1n I I I , I I Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix ,HDT_Mix THHDT i r + II I + Architectural Coatings : 5' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90: 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \l1/..c.+DId, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0548 1 9.1820 1 12.8337 1 0.0211 1 1 0.4731 1 0.4731 1 1 0.4590 : 0.4590 • 12,016.953 1 2,016.953 1 0.3211 1 i 2,024.980 9 I I 1 I 1 I I I ; I 4 1 4 1 I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0548 9.1820 12.8337 0.0211 0.4731 0.4731 0.4590 0.4590 2,016.953 2,016.953 0.3211 2,024.980 4 4 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •▪1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J T '1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I Worker •I 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 1 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • I 421.8410 1 421.8410 1 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I 1 I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • 1 I I 1 1 Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3685 8.2092 1 14.1751 1 0.0211 1 1 0.0307 1 0.0307 1 0.0307 : 0.0307 • 0.0000 12,016.953 1 2,016.953 1 0.3211 1 i 2,024.980 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I ; I 4 I 4 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.3685 8.2092 14.1751 0.0211 0.0307 0.0307 0.0307 0.0307 0.0000 2,016.953 2,016.953 0.3211 2,024.980 4 4 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J T 'I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Worker •1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 1 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • I 421.8410 1 421.8410 1 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 1 Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 2.5506 1 29.6686 16.4479 1 0.0427 1 1 1.1687 1 1.1687 1 1.0752 ; 1.0752 • 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 1 i 4,171.301 9 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 I 1 1 8 '1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.6513 1.1687 3.8199 0.2863 1.0752 1.3615 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 1 I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J n• '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Worker •1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 422.1203 '1 I I 1 003 1 1 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I 1 I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 I 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •1 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 1 0.0427 1 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 ; 0.0700 : 0.0000 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i 4,171.301 '1 I I 1 I 1 I I I . I 2 I 2 I 1 1 8 '1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 0.0427 2.6513 0.0700 2.7212 0.2863 0.0700 0.3563 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I. '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Worker •1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 422.1203 '1 I I 1 003 1 1 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I 1 I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 : 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.8763 1 20.4507 12.0655 1 0.0255 1 1 1.0225 1 1.0225 1 0.9407 ; 0.9407 . 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 !2,493.199 'I I I I I 1 I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 1.8763 20.4507 12.0655 0.0255 1.1603 1.0225 2.1828 0.1296 0.9407 1.0703 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I Hauling 4 0.6741 25.1038 4.1100 0.0922 2.1000 1 0.0642 1 2.1641 1 0.5757 1 0.0614 0.6371 • 9,792.252 1 9,792.252 1 0.5182 1 i 9,805.206 '1 I I I I I I I I . 9 I 9 I I 1 6 .1 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I 1 I Total 0.8639 25.2168 5.6312 0.0964 2.5471 0.0669 2.6140 0.6943 0.0639 0.7582 10,214.09 10,214.09 0.5293 10,227.32 39 39 69 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 : 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I 1 I I I I I I I , • I I I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.4782 8.4467 1 15.7926 1 0.0255 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 ; 0.0418 . 0.0000 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 !2,493.199 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I I 6 9 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.4782 8.4467 15.7926 0.0255 1.1603 0.0418 1.2021 0.1296 0.0418 0.1714 0.0000 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.6741 I 25.1038 1 4.1100 I 0.0922 1 2.1000 1 0.0642 1 2.1641 I 0.5757 I 0.0614 0.6371 • 9,792.252 1 9,792.252 1 0.5182 I i 9,805.206 '1 I I I I I I I I . 9 I 9 I I 1 6 .1 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 14.2400e- 1 0.4471 12.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 • 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I 1 I Total 0.8639 25.2168 5.6312 0.0964 2.5471 0.0669 2.6140 0.6943 0.0639 0.7582 10,214.09 10,214.09 0.5293 10,227.32 39 39 69 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.9468 1 9.7976 1 13.8431 1 0.0230 1 1 0.4153 1 0.4153 1 1 0.4055 : 0.4055 • 12,198.162 1 2,198.162 1 0.3671 1 i 2,207.341 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 8 I 8 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9468 9.7976 13.8431 0.0230 0.4153 0.4153 0.4055 0.4055 2,198.162 2,198.162 0.3671 2,207.341 8 8 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0964 3.6585 0.6711 0.0107 0.2562 1 5.5600e- 1 0.2617 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 • 1,129.230 1 1,129.230 1 0.0695 1 i 1,130.966 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J I J J J J m J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.9490 0.5648 7.6061 0.0212 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 12,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 2,110.601 9 I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.162 1 2,198.162 1 0.3671 1 i 2,207.341 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.162 2,198.162 0.3671 2,207.341 8 8 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0964 3.6585 0.6711 0.0107 0.2562 1 5.5600e- 1 0.2617 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 • 1,129.230 1 1,129.230 1 0.0695 1 i 1,130.966 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J I J J J J m J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.9490 0.5648 7.6061 0.0212 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 12,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 2,110.601 9 I I I I I I I I I 8 I 8 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8839 1 9.1631 1 13.8243 1 0.0230 1 1 0.3626 1 0.3626 1 1 0.3541 : 0.3541 • 12,198.260 1 2,198.260 1 0.3628 1 i 2,207.330 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 8 I 8 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8839 9.1631 13.8243 0.0230 0.3626 0.3626 0.3541 0.3541 2,198.260 2,198.260 0.3628 2,207.330 8 8 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.8878 0.5086 6.9841 0.0204 2.2355 1 0.0135 2.2490 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 • 12,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 2,031.150 9 I I I I I I I I I 4 1 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.260 1 2,198.260 1 0.3628 1 i 2,207.330 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.260 2,198.260 0.3628 2,207.330 8 8 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.8878 0.5086 6.9841 0.0204 2.2355 1 0.0135 2.2490 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 • 12,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 2,031.150 9 I I I I I I I I I 4 1 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.8354 1 8.7106 1 13.8183 1 0.0230 1 1 0.3197 1 0.3197 1 1 0.3118 : 0.3118 • 12,198.126 1 2,198.126 1 0.3584 i 2,207.084 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; I 3 I 3 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8354 8.7106 13.8183 0.0230 0.3197 0.3197 0.3118 0.3118 2,198.126 2,198.126 0.3584 2,207.084 3 3 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0718 2.8460 0.5625 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,096.475 1 1,096.475 1 0.0559 1 1,097.873 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8353 1 0.4609 6.5130 0.0197 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,964.071 1 1,964.071 0.0457 1 1,965.212 9 I I I I I I I I • 1 6 I 6 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.126 1 2,198.126 1 0.3584 i 2,207.084 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 3 1 3 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.126 2,198.126 0.3584 2,207.084 3 3 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0718 2.8460 0.5625 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,096.475 1 1,096.475 1 0.0559 1 1,097.873 9 I I 1 I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8353 1 0.4609 6.5130 0.0197 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,964.071 1 1,964.071 0.0457 1 1,965.212 9 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 6 I 6 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road .1 2.5506 1 29.6686 16.4479 1 0.0427 1 1 1.1687 1 1.1687 1 1.0752 ; 1.0752 . 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 1 i 4,171.301 9 1 I I I I I I I . 1 2 1 2 I I 1 8 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.6513 1.1687 3.8199 0.2863 1.0752 1.3615 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J n• '1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 I I 1 I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 I 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •1 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 1 0.0427 1 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 ; 0.0700 • 0.0000 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i 4,171.301 9 I I 1 I 1 I I I . I 2 I 2 I I 1 8 '1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 0.0427 2.6513 0.0700 2.7212 0.2863 0.0700 0.3563 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I. '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Worker •1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 422.1203 '1 I I 1 003 1 1 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I 1 I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 : 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.8763 1 20.4507 12.0655 1 0.0255 1 1 1.0225 1 1.0225 1 0.9407 ; 0.9407 . 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 i 2,493.199 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I . 1 5 1 5 I I 1 6 '1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 1 Total 1.8763 20.4507 12.0655 0.0255 1.1603 1.0225 2.1828 0.1296 0.9407 1.0703 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Hauling 4 0.6741 25.1038 4.1100 0.0922 2.1000 1 0.0642 1 2.1641 1 0.5757 0.0614 0.6371 • 9,792.252 1 9,792.252 0.5182 1 i 9,805.206 '1 I I I I I I I I . 9 I 9 I I 1 6 .1 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J J J J 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I 1 I Total 0.8639 25.2168 5.6312 0.0964 2.5471 0.0669 2.6140 0.6943 0.0639 0.7582 10,214.09 10,214.09 0.5293 10,227.32 39 39 69 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 : 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I 1 I I I I I I I , • I I I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.4782 8.4467 1 15.7926 1 0.0255 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 ; 0.0418 . 0.0000 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 !2,493.199 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I I 6 9 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.4782 8.4467 15.7926 0.0255 1.1603 0.0418 1.2021 0.1296 0.0418 0.1714 0.0000 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.6741 I 25.1038 1 4.1100 I 0.0922 1 2.1000 1 0.0642 1 2.1641 I 0.5757 I 0.0614 0.6371 • 9,792.252 1 9,792.252 1 0.5182 I i 9,805.206 '1 I I I I I I I I . 9 I 9 I I 1 6 .1 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 J J J J J J J J - J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 : 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I , . I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J J J J 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 14.2400e- 1 0.4471 12.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 • 421.8410 1 421.8410 0.0112 1 1 422.1203 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I 1 I Total 0.8639 25.2168 5.6312 0.0964 2.5471 0.0669 2.6140 0.6943 0.0639 0.7582 10,214.09 10,214.09 0.5293 10,227.32 39 39 69 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8837 1 8.8171 1 11.9287 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3971 1 0.3971 1 1 0.3888 ; 0.3888 • 11,913.578 1 1,913.578 1 0.2751 1 i 1,920.455 9 I I 1 I I I I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8837 8.8171 11.9287 0.0201 0.3971 0.3971 0.3888 0.3888 1,913.578 1,913.578 0.2751 1,920.455 1 1 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0964 3.6585 0.6711 0.0107 0.2562 1 5.5600e- 1 0.2617 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 • 1,129.230 1 1,129.230 1 0.0695 1 i 1,130.966 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J I J J J J m J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.9490 0.5648 7.6061 0.0212 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 12,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 2,110.601 9 I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 11,913.578 1 1,913.578 1 0.2751 1 i 1,920.455 '1 I I 1 I I I I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 3 '1 •I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.578 1,913.578 0.2751 1,920.455 1 1 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0964 3.6585 0.6711 0.0107 0.2562 1 5.5600e- 1 0.2617 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 • 1,129.230 1 1,129.230 1 0.0695 1 i 1,130.966 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J I J J J J m J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.9490 0.5648 7.6061 0.0212 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 12,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 2,110.601 9 I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8233 1 8.2299 1 11.9133 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3464 1 0.3464 1 1 0.3392 : 0.3392 • 11,913.676 1 1,913.676 1 0.2707 1 i 1,920.444 '1 I I 1 I I 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8233 8.2299 11.9133 0.0201 0.3464 0.3464 0.3392 0.3392 1,913.676 1,913.676 0.2707 1,920.444 1 1 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.8878 0.5086 6.9841 0.0204 2.2355 1 0.0135 2.2490 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 • 12,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 2,031.150 9 I I I I I I I I • I 4 1 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 11,913.676 1 1,913.676 1 0.2707 1 i 1,920.444 '1 I I 1 I I I I I • 1 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 •I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.676 1,913.676 0.2707 1,920.444 0 0 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worker 9 0.8878 0.5086 6.9841 0.0204 2.2355 1 0.0135 2.2490 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 • 12,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 2,031.150 9 I I I I I I I I • I 4 1 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.7749 1 7.7896 1 11.9059 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3037 1 0.3037 1 1 0.2971 : 0.2971 • 11,913.541 1 1,913.541 1 0.2663 1 i 1,920.199 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 6 I 6 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.7749 7.7896 11.9059 0.0201 0.3037 0.3037 0.2971 0.2971 1,913.541 1,913.541 0.2663 1,920.199 6 6 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0718 2.8460 0.5625 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,096.475 1 1,096.475 1 0.0559 1 1,097.873 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8353 1 0.4609 6.5130 0.0197 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,964.071 1 1,964.071 0.0457 1 1,965.212 9 I I I I I I I I 1 6 I 6 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 11,913.541 1 1,913.541 1 0.2663 1 i 1,920.199 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 6 I 6 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.541 1,913.541 0.2663 1,920.199 6 6 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0718 2.8460 0.5625 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,096.475 1 1,096.475 1 0.0559 1 1,097.873 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8353 1 0.4609 6.5130 0.0197 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,964.071 1 1,964.071 0.0457 1 1,965.212 9 I I I I I I I I • 1 6 I 6 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0327 1 10.1917 1 14.5842 1 0.0228 1 0.5102 1 0.5102 1 1 0.4694 : 0.4694 . 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I I I I I • 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I I I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0437 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0764 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 3 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 : 406.2301 'I I I I 003 I I 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 'I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 • I I I I 1 Total 0.2504 2.9345 1.9816 0.0145 0.7033 5.4300e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.1000e- 0.1974 1,503.858 1,503.858 0.0659 1,505.506 003 003 0 0 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3341 1 10.0395 1 17.2957 1 0.0228 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 : 0.0374 : 0.0000 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I I I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0437 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3778 10.0395 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 3 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 406.2301 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I I 1 'I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 • I I I I 1 Total 0.2504 2.9345 1.9816 0.0145 0.7033 5.4300e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.1000e- 0.1974 1,503.858 1,503.858 0.0659 1,505.506 003 003 0 0 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I I fl J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 1 0.4721 0.4721 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 1 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I I 7 9 I I I I 1 I I I . I I I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 1 4.0700e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 406.2301 '1 I I 1 003 1 1 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I . I I 1 1 I Total 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 405.9801 405.9801 0.0100 406.2301 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 1 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 1 1,879.126 'I I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 7 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 1 4.0700e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 406.2301 'I I I 1 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I 1 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I I 1 1 I Total 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 405.9801 405.9801 0.0100 406.2301 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0327 1 10.1917 1 14.5842 1 0.0228 1 0.5102 1 0.5102 1 1 0.4694 : 0.4694 . 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I . I 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0491 1 1 I 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I . I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0819 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 3 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 : 406.2301 '1 1 1 I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I 1 I I 1 'I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 . I I I I 1 Total 0.2504 2.9345 1.9816 0.0145 0.7033 5.4300e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.1000e- 0.1974 1,503.858 1,503.858 0.0659 1,505.506 003 003 0 0 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3341 1 10.0395 1 17.2957 1 0.0228 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 1 1 0.0374 : 0.0374 : 0.0000 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving •1 0.0491 1 1 I 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3832 10.0395 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling .: 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Vendor 9 0.0728 2.8328 0.5848 0.0104 0.2562 1 2.7300e- 1 0.2589 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 • 1,097.877 1 1,097.877 1 0.0559 1 1,099.276 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 3 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 406.2301 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I I 1 'I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 • I I I I 1 Total 0.2504 2.9345 1.9816 0.0145 0.7033 5.4300e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.1000e- 0.1974 1,503.858 1,503.858 0.0659 1,505.506 003 003 0 0 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I I fl J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 1 0.4721 0.4721 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 1 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I I 7 9 I I I I 1 I I I . I I I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 1 4.0700e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 406.2301 '1 I I 1 003 1 1 003 1 I I 003 . I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I . I I 1 1 I Total 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 405.9801 405.9801 0.0100 406.2301 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I I �1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 1 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 1 1,879.126 9 I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 1 4.0700e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 405.9801 1 405.9801 0.0100 1 : 406.2301 '1 I I I 003 I 1 003 1 I I 003 . 1 I I I 1 '1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 • I I 1 1 1 Total 0.1776 0.1017 1.3968 4.0700e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 405.9801 405.9801 0.0100 406.2301 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated :i 2.7755 i 15.9763 i 34.5375 : 0.1489 i 11.7290 : 0.0849 : 11.8139 i 3.1381 : 0.0791 3.2172 : 15,215.46 1 15,215.46: 0.6462 i i 15,231.61 29 I 29 I I 1 82 '1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 .4 } } } } } } } } * } } } r Unmitigated . 2.7755 . 15.9763 . 34.5375 • 0.1489 . 11.7290 • 0.0849 • 11.8139 . 3.1381 • 0.0791 . 3.2172 • 15,215.46• 15,215.46• 0.6462 . • 15,231.61 29 29 82 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise + 1,419.32 1,419.32 1419.32 • 5,197,323 • 5,197,323 City Park + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 T 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 T Y General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall + 83.16 ; 83.16 83.16 • 304,501 • 304,501 Total I 1,502.48 I 1,502.48 1,502.48 I 5,501,824 I 5,501,824 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 48 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.06 10.06 1 10.06 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.06 • 10.06 10.06 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 1: 0.014289 1: 0.004794 i 0.018611 1: 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 1: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 I I I I I I I I I 1 I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Install High Efficiency Lighting CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.1146 0.9798 i 0.4197 i 6.2500e- i i 0.0792 i 0.0792 i i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.266 � 1,250.266: 0.0240 � 0.0229 i 1,257.696 Mitigated ;i 003 • i 4 I 4 I I 1 1 I I I I I I:I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.1146 • 0.9798 • 0.4197 • 6.2500e- • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 1,250.266• 1,250.266• 0.0240 • 0.0229 • 1,257.696 Unmitigated 003 4 4 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid i 10497.7 •i 0.1132 I 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 I 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 I 0.0237 I 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 I 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 62.0919 •1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- I 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 004 I 004 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 I 'I I I I I I 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 52.6394 .1 5.7000e- 1 5.1600e- I 4.3400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.9000e- 1 3.9000e- 1 1 3.9000e- 3.9000e- • 1 6.1929 I 6.1929 1 1.2000e- 1 1.1000e- I 6.2297 Building i ;: 004 1 003 I 003 I 005 1 I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 • i I I 004 1 004 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 i 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 'I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I 1 I I I I . I I I 1 I I 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 1 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall i 14.8162 .1 1.6000e- 1 1.4500e- I 1.2200e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1.1000e- I 1 1.7431 I 1.7431 1 3.0000e- 1 3.0000e- 1 1.7534 1 :I 004 I 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 . 1 I I 005 I 005 1 I 'I I 1 I I I I I 1 , • I I 1 1 1 Total 0.1146 0.9798 0.4197 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.266 1,250.266 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.696 003 4 4 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10.4977 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I City Park 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous i 0.0620919.1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 1 4.6000e- ; 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I , I I I I 004 I 004 I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking i 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I '1 I 1 1 I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 , , I I I I 1 41 .1 1 j I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I General Office i 0.0526394.1 5.7000e- 1 5.1600e- 4.3400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.9000e- 1 3.9000e- 1 1 3.9000e- 3.9000e- I 1 6.1929 I 6.1929 1 1.2000e- 1 1.1000e- : 6.2297 Building 1 :1 004 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I , I I I 004 I 004 �1 J J J J J J J J .1. 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall 10.0148162.1 1.6000e- 1 1.4500e- 1.2200e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1.1000e- I 1 1.7431 I 1.7431 1 3.0000e- 1 3.0000e- : 1.7534 1 :' 004 I 003 I 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 : 1 I I 005 I 005 1 1 'I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 , . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1146 0.9798 0.4197 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.266 1,250.266 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.696 003 4 4 1 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 8.9995 i 3.9135 i 23.0563 i 0.0245 i i 0.4154 i 0.4154 i i 0.4154 0.4154 : 0.0000 i 4,718.741 :4,718.741 i 0.1271 : 0.0858 i 4,747.486 9 I I I I I I I I I I• I 8 1 8 I 1 8 .1 I I I I I I I I • I I 1 Unmitigated • 8.9995 • 3.9135 • 23.0563 • 0.0245 • • 0.4154 • 0.4154 • • 0.4154 • 0.4154 • 0.0000 •4,718.741 •4,718.741 • 0.1271 • 0.0858 •4,747.486 8 8 8 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.6460 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i I i 0.0000 Coating :: I I •i I I I I I I 1 I • • I I 1 v J J Consumer 9 7.2748 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i I I 0.0000 Products :: I I I '� 1 I I I I I I I ei • , I I 1 Hearth 9 0.4290 i 3.6660 : 1.5600 i 0.0234 i : 0.2964 i 0.2964 : i 0.2964 0.2964 • 0.0000 4,680.000:4,680.000 i 0.0897 : 0.0858 14,707.810 'I I I I I I I I I , 0 I 0 I I 1 9 'I I I I I I I 1 I • , I I 1I •I J J J I 1 Landscaping 9 0.6498 i 0.2475 1 21.4963 i 1.1400e- i 1 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 : I 39.6759 •I I 1 I 003 I I I I I I I I Total 8.9995 3.9135 23.0563 0.0245 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 4,718.741 4,718.741 0.1271 0.0858 4,747.486 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Architectural •; 0.6460 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • i : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I '� 1 I I I I I 1 I , I 1 I I ,� I 1. J J J Consumer .1 7.2748 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 . i : 0.0000 i i I 0.0000 Products •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I I '� 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 ;I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Hearth •1 0.4290 i 3.6660 : 1.5600 i 0.0234 i 1 0.2964 i 0.2964 : i 0.2964 0.2964 : 0.0000 i 4,680.000:4,680.000 i 0.0897 1 0.0858 :4,707.810 •1 I I I I I I I • : 0 : 0 : 1 1 9 •l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 . J •J J J J J J J 7 J J J Landscaping •1 0.6498 : 0.2475 : 21.4963 : 1.1400e- : : 0.1190 i 0.1190 : : 0.1190 0.1190 I i 38.7418 : 38.7418 : 0.0374 1 i 39.6759 •1 I I I 003 I I I I • •1 I I I I I . 1 1 1 Total 8.9995 3.9135 23.0563 0.0245 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 4,718.741 4,718.741 0.1271 0.0858 4,747.486 8 8 8 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:30 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Equipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number J 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 5.54 + 1000sgft ; 0.13 5,537.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 328.00 + Space ; 0.00 131,200.00 + 0 Parking Lot 200.00 + Space ; 1.80 80,000.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,375.00 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.58 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 3,572.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 354,053.00 + 785 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 r f I. Strip Mall 2.44 1000sgft 0.00 2,436.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 627.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Land Use- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Residential Land Use Size" and "Underestimated Parking Land Use Size" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Construction Phase- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with RIS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values." Energy Use - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Solid Waste- See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates" Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Final Mitigation" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation" Fleet Mix- See SWAPE comment regarding "Unsubstantiated Changes to Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix." CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Water Mitigation - Consistent with the RIS/MND's model. Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 1.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 6.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated } 0.00 2.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 8.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 2.00 t T tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 3.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated r 0.00 4.00 r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim r t tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim t T tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim . I- 4 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier r No Change Tier 4 Interim I. tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change 7 Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstEquipMitigation Tier i No Change Tier 4 Interim r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 72.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 540.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 230.00 390.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 18.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 96.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 20.00 108.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 24.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 10.00 12.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r 4 • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 r • tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek i 5.00 6.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 772.17 164.47 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter tblEnergyUse T24E • 845.95 177.65 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.92 3.50 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 3.07 2.74 r 4 • tblEnergyUse T24E i 4.58 4.09 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass i 1,019.20 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 25.90 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace i 0.10 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblFireplaces NumberWood i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 21,180.00 r 4 • tblGrading MaterialExported i 0.00 10,590.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 5,540.00 5,537.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 14,374.80 14,375.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 3,580.00 3,572.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 259,000.00 354,053.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 1,000.00 1,570.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet i 2,440.00 2,436.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 2.95 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.08 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 6.82 3.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r 4 • tblLandUse LotAcreage i 0.06 0.00 r . tblLandUse Population i 741.00 785.00 r . tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 r • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 5.00 • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 2.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 r . tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 627.49 r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 584.00 v r • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 0.03 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.46 • 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter tblSolidWaste • SolidWasteGenerationRate • 20.41 0.00 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 2.56 28.10 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 67.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 13.00 40.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 . tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.06 r 4 . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 11.00 0.00 r . tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.06 tblVehicleTrips HOTTP 40.60 • 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP • 40.60 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL } 5.90 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HSTTP i 19.20 20.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.06 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP } 40.20 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PRTP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 34.08 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 1.05 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 34.08 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 6.65 5.48 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 1.89 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblVehicleTrips WDTR 5.81 0.00 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR i 33.82 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 44.32 34.08 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 24,295,400.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 65,154.03 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 984,644.96 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 211,732.46 0.00 r 4 • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 180,736.95 2,979,860.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 603,492.07 0.00 r 4 • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate i 110,774.26 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 •1 4.7747 i 59.7234 1 39.8050 i 0.1713 1 6.1991 1.6063 i 7.7243 1.4906 i 1.5015 2.9199 0.0000 i 17,560.01 : 17,560.01 i 1.8659 1 0.0000 i 17,606.66 1 9 1 I 1 1 I 1 I • 9 1 I I i 85 i 85 I i 54 ,� J J J 2023 •1 39.1938 i 50.2362 : 71.2922 i 0.1725 1 6.3900 1.7731 i 8.1631 1.7179 i 1.6728 3.3907 : 0.0000 i 17,120.51 : 17,120.51 i 2.4140 : 0.0000 : 17,180.86 9 I 1 I I : I : . 1 91 : 91 I 1 98 91 1 1 1 1 . 1 2024 •1 3.4508 i 23.0855 : 37.6475 i 0.0984 1 4.9834 0.6558 i 5.6392 1.3333 i 0.6389 1.9722 : 0.0000 i 9,745.442:9,745.442 i 0.8285 1 0.0000 1 9,766.153 9 I I I 1 . 3 I 3 1 1 9 9 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 : . I Maximum 39.1938 59.7234 71.2922 0.1725 6.3900 1.7731 8.1631 1.7179 1.6728 3.3907 0.0000 17,560.01 17,560.01 2.4140 0.0000 17,606.66 11 85 85 54 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 .1 2.9770 1 47.2851 : 47.7478 1 0.1713 1 6.1991 1 0.2256 1 6.4247 1 1.4906 1 0.2212 ; 1.7118 0.0000 17,560.01 : 17,560.01 : 1.8659 1 0.0000 i 17,606.66 9 I I I I I I I I ■ 85 I 85 I I 1 54 9I I I I I I I I , I I I J J J J J J J J - J J J1. 2023 9 37.6532 i 49.6138 : 79.8744 i 0.1725 1 6.3900 : 0.6756 i 6.8094 : 1.7179 i 0.6727 2.3169 : 0.0000 17,120.51 : 17,120.51 i 2.4140 : 0.0000 1 17,180.86 9 I I I I I I I I ■ 91 I 91 I I 1 98 9I I I I I I I I , I I I 9 J J J J J J J J J J J1. 2024 •i i 2.7057 i 23.6604 : 40.8203 i 0.0984 1 4.9834 : 0.1576 i 5.1410 : 1.3333 i 0.1552 1.4885 .. 0.0000 9,745.442:9,745.442 i 0.8285 : 0.0000 1 9,766.153 9 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 3 I 3 I I 1 9 9I I I I I I I I • I I I Maximum 37.6532 49.6138 79.8744 0.1725 6.3900 0.6756 6.8094 1.7179 0.6727 2.3169 0.0000 17,560.01 17,560.01 2.4140 0.0000 17,606.66 85 85 54 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 8.61 9.38 -13.24 0.00 0.00 73.76 14.64 0.00 72.49 33.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •I 8.9995 I 3.9135 I 23.0563 I 0.0245 I I 0.4154 0.4154 I I 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 14,718.741 I 4,718.741 0.1271 I 0.0858 i 4,747.486 'I I I I I I I I I . I 8 I 8 I I I 8 'I I I I I I I I I I I I ;I J J J J J J J J .. I J J J Energy .1 0.1146 I 0.9798 I 0.4197 I 6.2500e- I 1 0.0792 I 0.0792 I I 0.0792 0.0792 • 1,250.266 I 1,250.266I 0.0240 I 0.0229 I 1,257.696 .1 I I I 003 I I I I . I I 4 4 I I I 1 '1 1 1 1 I 1 •I . I I 1 I ;I J J J J J J J J J J J Mobile .1 2.4144 I 15.9946 I 29.9789 I 0.1375 I 11.7290 1 0.0853 I 11.8143 I 3.1381 I 0.0795 3.2176 • 14,064.271 14,064.271 0.6538 I 114,080.62 'I I I I I I I I I • .I I I I I I I I I ' • I 72 i 72 I I 1 32 Total 11.5285 20.8879 53.4549 0.1683 11.7290 0.5800 12.3089 3.1381 0.5741 3.7122 0.0000 20,033.28 20,033.28 0.8049 0.1087 20,085.80 54 54 62 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •1 8.9995 I 3.9135 I 23.0563 I 0.0245 I I 0.4154 I 0.4154 I I 0.4154 0.4154 : 0.0000 4,718.741 I 4,718.741 I 0.1271 I 0.0858 i 4,747.486 'I I I I I I I I I . 8 I 8 I I I 8 'I I I I I I I I I , . I I I 'I J J J J J J J J - J J J 1. Energy . 0.1146 I 0.9798 I 0.4197 I 6.2500e- 1 I 0.0792 I 0.0792 I I 0.0792 0.0792 • 1,250.266 I 1,250.266 I 0.0240 I 0.0229 i 1,257.696i •I I I I 003 I I I I I . 4 I 4 I I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I , I I I J J J J J J J J v J J J 1. Mobile 91 2.4144 I 15.9946 I 29.9789 I 0.1375 1 11.7290 I 0.0853 I 11.8143 I 3.1381 I 0.0795 3.2176 • 14,064.27 I 14,064.27 I 0.6538 I 14,080.62 •I I I I I I I I I . 72 I 72 I I i 32 'I I I I I I I I I , . I I Total 11.5285 20.8879 53.4549 0.1683 11.7290 0.5800 12.3089 3.1381 0.5741 3.7122 0.0000 20,033.28 20,033.28 0.8049 0.1087 20,085.80 54 54 62 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 -Demolition :Demolition !3/5/2022 13/18/2022 l 6: 12: i r i -I , 2 -Site Preparation :Grading !4/4/2022 :4/30/2022 1 61 247 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 3 -Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Site Preparation 15/2/2022 :5/28/2022 1 61 247 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 4 -Construction-East Building :Building Construction 15/30/2022 :2/17/2024 1 61 5407 + I 1 1 5 -Grading :Grading !11/7/2022 i11/26/2022 1 61 187 i r i , -I , 6 -Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation !11/28/2022 112/10/2022 1 61 127 i r i , -I 7 -Construction-West Building :Building Construction !12/12/2022 :3/9/2024 1 61 390: i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 8 -Paving-East Building :Paving 15/8/2023 :9/9/2023 1 61 1087 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 9 -Architectural Coatings-East Bldg :Architectural Coating 15/8/2023 :7/29/2023 1 61 727 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 10 -Paving-West Building :Paving !8/7/2023 i 11/25/2023 : 61 96: • r r t -r r--•• 1.- 1 1 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:Architectural Coating .9/11/2023 .12/2/2023 6. 72: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 720,137; Residential Outdoor: 240,046; Non-Residential Indoor: 11,960; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,987; Striped Parking Area: 12,672 (Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.001 81: 0.73 ; Demolition :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158' 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 2 4.001 84' 0.74 y ; Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212' 0.43 y ; Site Preparation :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Graders ; 1 8.001 187' 0.41 y ; Site Preparation :Rollers ; 2 8.001 80' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.001 367: 0.48 y ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212: 0.43 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247' 0.40 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.001 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilities-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.001 78' 0.50 y ; Construction-East Building :Aerial Lifts ; 2 7.001 63' 0.31 y ; Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 0 7.001 231' 0.29 y ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.001 89' 0.20 1 y _ Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84' 0.74 y ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100' 0.40 .1. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.001 97' 0.37 y ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.001 46' 0.45 .1. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212' 0.43 .1. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158: 0.38 * r Grading :Graders 1' 8.00: 187' 0.41 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • Grading •Rollers 2• 8.00• 80• 0.38 Grading [Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247' 0.40 • y i Grading [Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.001 247• 0.40 i J. i Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 • J. i Construction-West Building [Cranes ; 0 7.00 231' 0.29 J. ; Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84• 0.74 • J. i Construction-West Building [Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100• 0.40 • J. i Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. i Paving-East Building [Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 J. ; Paving-East Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.00 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Architectural Coatings-East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 5 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 i J. i Paving-West Building [Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 5• 8.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 5; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 6; 40.00i 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Cnc,+Q..;Irl;n., , I I , Construction 'East i 6; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I T Grading 6; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix HHDTe I I I Trenching/Utilities- 5; 40.00. 0.00i 1,440.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT \4/.,n+Q..;1,1 n., I I , I Construction-West i 4; 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I I , Architectural Coatings y 5; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT Cnn+Q1.1n I I I , I I Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix ,HDT_Mix THHDT i r + II I + Architectural Coatings : 5' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90: 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \l1/..c.+DId, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0548 1 9.1820 1 12.8337 1 0.0211 1 1 0.4731 1 0.4731 1 1 0.4590 : 0.4590 • 12,016.953 1 2,016.953 1 0.3211 1 i 2,024.980 9 I I 1 I 1 I I I ; I 4 1 4 1 I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0548 9.1820 12.8337 0.0211 0.4731 0.4731 0.4590 0.4590 2,016.953 2,016.953 0.3211 2,024.980 4 4 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •▪1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I Worker •I 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 1 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • I 378.4584 1 378.4584 1 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3685 8.2092 1 14.1751 1 0.0211 1 1 0.0307 1 0.0307 1 0.0307 : 0.0307 • 0.0000 12,016.953 1 2,016.953 1 0.3211 1 i 2,024.980 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; I 4 I 4 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.3685 8.2092 14.1751 0.0211 0.0307 0.0307 0.0307 0.0307 0.0000 2,016.953 2,016.953 0.3211 2,024.980 4 4 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •▪1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 'I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 1 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • I 378.4584 1 378.4584 1 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road .1 2.5506 1 29.6686 16.4479 1 0.0427 1 1 1.1687 1 1.1687 1 1.0752 : 1.0752 • 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 1 i 4,171.301 9 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 2 I 1 1 8 9I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.6513 1.1687 3.8199 0.2863 1.0752 1.3615 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 •1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 I 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •1 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 1 0.0427 1 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 ; 0.0700 : 0.0000 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i 4,171.301 '1 I I 1 I 1 I I I . I 2 I 2 I 1 1 8 '1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 0.0427 2.6513 0.0700 2.7212 0.2863 0.0700 0.3563 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.8763 1 20.4507 12.0655 1 0.0255 1 1 1.0225 1 1.0225 1 0.9407 ; 0.9407 . 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 ;2,493.199 'I I I I I 1 I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 1.8763 20.4507 12.0655 0.0255 1.1603 1.0225 2.1828 0.1296 0.9407 1.0703 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.7049 1 25.1471 1 4.6850 1 0.0897 1 2.1000 1 0.0651 1 2.1651 1 0.5757 1 0.0623 0.6380 • i 9,532.877 1 9,532.877 1 0.5629 1 9,546.950 9 I I I I I I I I . 1 8 I 8 I I 1 8 '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 ; 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 1 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I '1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I Total 0.8956 25.2659 5.9307 0.0935 2.5471 0.0679 2.6149 0.6943 0.0648 0.7591 9,911.336 9,911.336 0.5727 9,925.654 2 2 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Trenching/Utilities - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I 1 I I I I I I I , • I I I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.4782 8.4467 1 15.7926 1 0.0255 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 ; 0.0418 . 0.0000 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 ;2,493.199 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I I 6 9 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.4782 8.4467 15.7926 0.0255 1.1603 0.0418 1.2021 0.1296 0.0418 0.1714 0.0000 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day IHauling 9 0.7049 25.1471 I 4.6850 I 0.0897 I 2.1000 1 0.0651 1 2.1651 I 0.5757 I 0.0623 0.6380 • 9,532.877 1 9,532.877 1 0.5629 I 1 9,546.950 9 I I I I I I I I . 1 8 I 8 I I 1 8 '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 ; 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . 1 I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1 1.2457 13.8000e- 1 0.4471 12.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 19.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I '1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I Total 0.8956 25.2659 5.9307 0.0935 2.5471 0.0679 2.6149 0.6943 0.0648 0.7591 9,911.336 9,911.336 0.5727 9,925.654 2 2 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.9468 1 9.7976 1 13.8431 1 0.0230 1 1 0.4153 1 0.4153 1 1 0.4055 : 0.4055 • 12,198.162 1 2,198.162 1 0.3671 1 i 2,207.341 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 8 I 8 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9468 9.7976 13.8431 0.0230 0.4153 0.4153 0.4055 0.4055 2,198.162 2,198.162 0.3671 2,207.341 8 8 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.1024 3.6155 0.7882 0.0103 0.2562 1 5.7200e- 1 0.2619 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 • 1,085.025 1 1,085.025 0.0771 i 1,086.952 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Worker 9i 0.9535 1 0.5937 6.2284 0.0190 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 11,892.292 1 1,892.292 1 0.0490 1 1,893.518 9 I I I I I I I I • I p 1 0 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.162 1 2,198.162 1 0.3671 1 i 2,207.341 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.162 2,198.162 0.3671 2,207.341 8 8 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.1024 3.6155 0.7882 0.0103 0.2562 1 5.7200e- 1 0.2619 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 • 1,085.025 1 1,085.025 0.0771 i 1,086.952 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Worker 9i 0.9535 1 0.5937 6.2284 0.0190 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 11,892.292 1 1,892.292 1 0.0490 1 1,893.518 9 I I I I I I I I I p 1 0 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8839 1 9.1631 1 13.8243 1 0.0230 1 1 0.3626 1 0.3626 1 1 0.3541 ' 0.3541 • 12,198.260 1 2,198.260 1 0.3628 1 i 2,207.330 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 8 I 8 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8839 9.1631 13.8243 0.0230 0.3626 0.3626 0.3541 0.3541 2,198.260 2,198.260 0.3628 2,207.330 8 8 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1 1,057.137 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Worker 9 0.8947 0.5344 1 5.7101 1 0.0183 1 2.2355 1 0.0135 1 2.2490 0.5929 1 0.0124 0.6053 • 11,821.266 1 1,821.266 1 0.0440 1 1,822.365 9 I I I I I I I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.260 1 2,198.260 1 0.3628 1 i 2,207.330 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.260 2,198.260 0.3628 2,207.330 8 8 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1,057.137 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8947 0.5344 5.7101 0.0183 2.2355 1 0.0135 2.2490 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 • 11,821.266 1 1,821.266 0.0440 1 1,822.365 9 I I I I I I I I 1 8 I 8 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.8354 1 8.7106 1 13.8183 1 0.0230 1 1 0.3197 1 0.3197 1 1 0.3118 : 0.3118 • 12,198.126 1 2,198.126 1 0.3584 i 2,207.084 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; I 3 I 3 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8354 8.7106 13.8183 0.0230 0.3197 0.3197 0.3118 0.3118 2,198.126 2,198.126 0.3584 2,207.084 3 3 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0761 2.8087 0.6463 9.9900e- 0.2562 1 2.8200e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.6900e- 0.0765 • 1,054.662 1 1,054.662 0.0618 1,056.206 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8442 0.4839 5.3154 0.0177 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,762.225 1 1,762.225 0.0401 1 1 1,763.228 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 0 I 0 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •i 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 1 0.0230 1 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 1 0.0963 : 0.0963 • 0.0000 12,198.126 1 2,198.126 1 0.3584 i 2,207.084 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 3 1 3 I I 1 9 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.4687 9.3633 15.5636 0.0230 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 2,198.126 2,198.126 0.3584 2,207.084 3 3 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0761 2.8087 0.6463 9.9900e- 0.2562 1 2.8200e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.6900e- 0.0765 • 1,054.662 1 1,054.662 0.0618 1 1,056.206 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Worker 9 0.8442 0.4839 1 5.3154 1 0.0177 1 2.2355 1 0.0134 1 2.2489 0.5929 1 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,762.225 1 1,762.225 1 0.0401 1 1 1,763.228 '1 I I I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 2.5506 1 29.6686 16.4479 1 0.0427 1 1 1.1687 1 1.1687 1 1.0752 ; 1.0752 . 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 1 i 4,171.301 9 1 I I I I I I I . 1 2 1 2 I I 1 8 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.6513 1.1687 3.8199 0.2863 1.0752 1.3615 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 2.6513 1 1 0.0000 1 1 2.6513 I 1 0.2863 1 1 0.0000 : 0.2863 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road •1 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 1 0.0427 1 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 1 0.0700 ; 0.0700 • 0.0000 1 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i 4,171.301 9 I I 1 I 1 I I I . I 2 I 2 I I 1 8 '1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.7319 12.1952 23.9219 0.0427 2.6513 0.0700 2.7212 0.2863 0.0700 0.3563 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 .1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 f1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.8763 1 20.4507 12.0655 1 0.0255 1 1 1.0225 1 1.0225 1 0.9407 ; 0.9407 . 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 i 2,493.199 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I . 1 5 1 5 I I 1 6 '1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 1 Total 1.8763 20.4507 12.0655 0.0255 1.1603 1.0225 2.1828 0.1296 0.9407 1.0703 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I Hauling •1 0.7049 1 25.1471 1 4.6850 1 0.0897 1 2.1000 1 0.0651 2.1651 1 0.5757 1 0.0623 0.6380 • i 9,532.877 1 9,532.877 0.5629 1 9,546.950 9 I I I I I I I I . 1 8 I 8 I I 1 8 '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . 1 I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 1 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 9.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I '1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I Total 0.8956 25.2659 5.9307 0.0935 2.5471 0.0679 2.6149 0.6943 0.0648 0.7591 9,911.336 9,911.336 0.5727 9,925.654 2 2 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 I 1 Fugitive Dust 41 1 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1.1603 1 1 0.1296 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.1296 1 1 1 0.0000 1 1 1 i 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I 1 I I I I I I I , • I I I I I f1 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Off-Road .1 0.4782 8.4467 1 15.7926 1 0.0255 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 1 0.0418 ; 0.0418 . 0.0000 1 2,473.202 1 2,473.202 1 0.7999 ;2,493.199 '1 I I I I I I I I . 1 5 I 5 I I I 6 9 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.4782 8.4467 15.7926 0.0255 1.1603 0.0418 1.2021 0.1296 0.0418 0.1714 0.0000 2,473.202 2,473.202 0.7999 2,493.199 5 5 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day IHauling 9 0.7049 25.1471 I 4.6850 I 0.0897 I 2.1000 1 0.0651 1 2.1651 I 0.5757 I 0.0623 0.6380 • 9,532.877 1 9,532.877 1 0.5629 I 1 9,546.950 9 I I I I I I I I . 1 8 I 8 I I 1 8 '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 ; 0.0000 'I 1 I I I I I I I . 1 I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J '1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.1907 0.1188 1 1.2457 13.8000e- 1 0.4471 12.7800e- 0.4499 1 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 19.8100e- 1 378.7036 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I '1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I Total 0.8956 25.2659 5.9307 0.0935 2.5471 0.0679 2.6149 0.6943 0.0648 0.7591 9,911.336 9,911.336 0.5727 9,925.654 2 2 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8837 1 8.8171 1 11.9287 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3971 1 0.3971 1 1 0.3888 : 0.3888 • 11,913.578 1 1,913.578 1 0.2751 1 i 1,920.455 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8837 8.8171 11.9287 0.0201 0.3971 0.3971 0.3888 0.3888 1,913.578 1,913.578 0.2751 1,920.455 1 1 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.1024 3.6155 0.7882 0.0103 0.2562 1 5.7200e- 1 0.2619 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 • 1,085.025 1 1,085.025 0.0771 i 1,086.952 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Worker 9i 0.9535 1 0.5937 6.2284 0.0190 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 11,892.292 1 1,892.292 1 0.0490 1 1,893.518 9 I I I I I I I I • I p 1 0 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 11,913.578 1 1,913.578 1 0.2751 1 i 1,920.455 '1 I I 1 I I I I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 3 '1 •I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.578 1,913.578 0.2751 1,920.455 1 1 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.1024 3.6155 0.7882 0.0103 0.2562 1 5.7200e- 1 0.2619 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 • 1,085.025 1 1,085.025 0.0771 i 1,086.952 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Worker 9i 0.9535 1 0.5937 6.2284 0.0190 2.2355 1 0.0139 1 2.2494 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 • 11,892.292 1 1,892.292 1 0.0490 1 1,893.518 9 I I I I I I I I • I p 1 0 I I 1 0 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.8233 1 8.2299 1 11.9133 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3464 1 0.3464 1 1 0.3392 ' 0.3392 • 1 1,913.676 1 1,913.676 1 0.2707 1 i 1,920.444 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I 1 4 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.8233 8.2299 11.9133 0.0201 0.3464 0.3464 0.3392 0.3392 1,913.676 1,913.676 0.2707 1,920.444 1 1 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 1 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 1 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1 1,057.137 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Worker 9 0.8947 0.5344 1 5.7101 1 0.0183 1 2.2355 1 0.0135 1 2.2490 0.5929 1 0.0124 0.6053 • I 1,821.266 1 1,821.266 1 0.0440 1 1,822.365 9 I I I I I I I I • 1 8 I 8 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 1 1,913.676 1 1,913.676 1 0.2707 1 i 1,920.444 '1 I I 1 I I I I I • 1 0 I 0 I I 1 4 '1 •I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.676 1,913.676 0.2707 1,920.444 0 0 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 1 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 1 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1 1,057.137 9 I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Worker 9 0.8947 0.5344 1 5.7101 1 0.0183 1 2.2355 1 0.0135 1 2.2490 0.5929 1 0.0124 0.6053 • I 1,821.266 1 1,821.266 1 0.0440 1 1,822.365 9 I I I I I I I I • 1 8 I 8 I I 1 7 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.7749 1 7.7896 1 11.9059 1 0.0201 1 1 0.3037 1 0.3037 1 1 0.2971 : 0.2971 • 11,913.541 1 1,913.541 1 0.2663 1 i 1,920.199 9 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 6 I 6 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.7749 7.7896 11.9059 0.0201 0.3037 0.3037 0.2971 0.2971 1,913.541 1,913.541 0.2663 1,920.199 6 6 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ,1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0761 2.8087 0.6463 9.9900e- 0.2562 1 2.8200e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.6900e- 0.0765 • 1,054.662 1 1,054.662 0.0618 1,056.206 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.8442 0.4839 5.3154 0.0177 2.2355 1 0.0134 2.2489 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,762.225 1 1,762.225 0.0401 1 1 1,763.228 '1 I I I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3964 1 7.7117 1 13.3333 1 0.0201 1 1 0.0288 1 0.0288 1 1 0.0288 : 0.0288 • 0.0000 11,913.541 1 1,913.541 1 0.2663 1 i 1,920.199 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 6 I 6 I I 1 2 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3964 7.7117 13.3333 0.0201 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0288 0.0000 1,913.541 1,913.541 0.2663 1,920.199 6 6 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0761 2.8087 0.6463 9.9900e- 0.2562 1 2.8200e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.6900e- 0.0765 • 1,054.662 1 1,054.662 0.0618 1 1,056.206 '1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . 3 I 3 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I 1 '1 J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Worker 9 0.8442 0.4839 1 5.3154 1 0.0177 1 2.2355 1 0.0134 1 2.2489 0.5929 1 0.0123 0.6052 • 11,762.225 1 1,762.225 1 0.0401 1 1 1,763.228 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 0 I 0 I I 1 6 '1 I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0327 1 10.1917 1 14.5842 1 0.0228 1 0.5102 1 0.5102 1 1 0.4694 : 0.4694 . 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I I I I I • 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I I I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0437 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total .11 1.0764 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1,057.137 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I 'I I 1 1 1 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2562 2.9012 1.8125 0.0137 0.7033 5.5300e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.2000e- 0.1975 1,419.846 1,419.846 0.0706 1,421.610 003 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3341 1 10.0395 1 17.2957 1 0.0228 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 : 0.0374 : 0.0000 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I I I I I • I I I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0437 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3778 10.0395 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1,057.137 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I 'I I 1 1 1 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2562 2.9012 1.8125 0.0137 0.7033 5.5300e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.2000e- 0.1975 1,419.846 1,419.846 0.0706 1,421.610 003 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 I 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . 1 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 : 0.4721 . 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 ! 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 3 I 3 I I I 7 9 I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 1 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 •1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 364.2534 364.2534 8.7900e- 364.4731 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.10 Architectural Coatings - East Bldg -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 I 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . 1 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 : 0.4721 . 0.0000 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 ! 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 3 I 3 I I I 7 '1 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 1 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 •1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 364.2534 364.2534 8.7900e- 364.4731 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 1.0327 1 10.1917 1 14.5842 1 0.0228 1 0.5102 1 0.5102 1 1 0.4694 : 0.4694 . 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0491 1 1 I 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0819 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1,057.137 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I 'I I 1 1 1 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2562 2.9012 1.8125 0.0137 0.7033 5.5300e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.2000e- 0.1975 1,419.846 1,419.846 0.0706 1,421.610 003 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.11 Paving -West Building -2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •i 0.3341 1 10.0395 1 17.2957 1 0.0228 1 0.0374 1 0.0374 1 1 0.0374 : 0.0374 : 0.0000 1 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 1 i 2,225.433 'I I I 1 I 1 I I I • I 1 I 1 I I 1 6 'I I I 1 I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I Paving .1 0.0491 1 1 I 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 •• 1 1 0.0000 1 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.3832 10.0395 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I : I 1 I I : 1 I I Hauling •I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 J J J I J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vendor 9 0.0772 2.7944 0.6705 0.0100 0.2562 1 2.8300e- 1 0.2590 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 • 1,055.593 1 1,055.593 0.0618 1,057.137 'I I I I I I 003 I I I 003 . 4 I 4 I I 1 7 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I J J J J J J J J m J J J 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • I 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 'I I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I I 'I I 1 1 1 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2562 2.9012 1.8125 0.0137 0.7033 5.5300e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.2000e- 0.1975 1,419.846 1,419.846 0.0706 1,421.610 003 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 I 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . 1 1 I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 : 0.4721 . 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 ! 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 3 I 3 I I I 7 9 I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 1 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 •1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 364.2534 364.2534 8.7900e- 364.4731 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2023 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 Archit.Coating •i 32.7482 I 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I 1 1 I I I I I I . I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I . 1 1 I I I �1 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-Road .1 1.2777 8.6866 1 12.0741 1 0.0198 1 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 1 0.4721 : 0.4721 . 0.0000 1 1,876.320 1 1,876.320 1 0.1123 ! 1,879.126 '1 I I I I I I I I . I 3 I 3 I I 1 7 9 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I I Total 34.0260 8.6866 12.0741 0.0198 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.4721 0.0000 1,876.320 1,876.320 0.1123 1,879.126 3 3 7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 •I 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 q I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J J J •1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker •1 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 1 3.6500e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7000e- 0.4498 1 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 • 1 364.2534 1 364.2534 8.7900e- 1 364.4731 •1 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 . I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I I 1 I I I I • 1 I I I 1 Total 0.1789 0.1069 1.1420 3.6500e- 0.4471 2.7000e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4900e- 0.1211 364.2534 364.2534 8.7900e- 364.4731 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated :: 2.4144 i 15.9946 i 29.9789 : 0.1375 i 11.7290 : 0.0853 : 11.8143 i 3.1381 : 0.0795 3.2176 : 14,064.27 1 14,064.27: 0.6538 i i 14,080.62 72 I 72 I I 1 32 '1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 .4 } } } } } } } } r } } } r Unmitigated . 2.4144 . 15.9946 . 29.9789 • 0.1375 . 11.7290 • 0.0853 • 11.8143 . 3.1381 • 0.0795 . 3.2176 • 14,064.27• 14,064.27• 0.6538 . • 14,080.62 72 72 32 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise + 1,419.32 ; 1,419.32 1419.32 • 5,197,323 5,197,323 City Park + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 T 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 T Y General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall + 83.16 ; 83.16 83.16 • 304,501 • 304,501 Total I 1,502.48 I 1,502.48 1,502.48 I 5,501,824 I 5,501,824 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 48 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.06 10.06 1 10.06 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.06 • 10.06 10.06 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 1: 0.014289 1: 0.004794 i 0.018611 1: 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 1: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 I I I I I I I I I 1 I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Install High Efficiency Lighting CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.1146 0.9798 i 0.4197 i 6.2500e- i i 0.0792 i 0.0792 i i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.266 � 1,250.266: 0.0240 � 0.0229 i 1,257.696 Mitigated ;i 003 • i 4 I 4 I I 1 1 I I I I I I:I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.1146 • 0.9798 • 0.4197 • 6.2500e- • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 1,250.266• 1,250.266• 0.0240 • 0.0229 • 1,257.696 Unmitigated 003 4 4 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid i 10497.7 •i 0.1132 I 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 I 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 I 0.0237 I 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 I 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 62.0919 •1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- I 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 004 I 004 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 I 'I I I I I I 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 52.6394 .1 5.7000e- 1 5.1600e- I 4.3400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.9000e- 1 3.9000e- 1 1 3.9000e- 3.9000e- • 1 6.1929 I 6.1929 1 1.2000e- 1 1.1000e- I 6.2297 Building i ;: 004 1 003 I 003 I 005 1 I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 • i I I 004 1 004 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 i 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 'I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I 1 I I I I . I I I 1 I I 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 1 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall i 14.8162 .1 1.6000e- 1 1.4500e- I 1.2200e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1.1000e- I 1 1.7431 I 1.7431 1 3.0000e- 1 3.0000e- 1 1.7534 1 :I 004 I 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 . 1 I I 005 I 005 1 I 'I I 1 I I I I I 1 , • I I 1 1 1 Total 0.1146 0.9798 0.4197 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.266 1,250.266 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.696 003 4 4 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10.4977 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I City Park 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous i 0.0620919.1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 1 4.6000e- ; 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I , I I I I 004 I 004 I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking i 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I '1 I 1 1 I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I 1 I I I 1 1 , , I I I 1 1 I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 0.0526394.1 5.7000e- 1 5.1600e- 4.3400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.9000e- 1 3.9000e- 1 1 3.9000e- 3.9000e- I 1 6.1929 I 6.1929 1 1.2000e- 1 1.1000e- : 6.2297 Building 1 :1 004 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I , I I I 004 I 004 �1 J J J J J J J J .1. 1 J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall 10.0148162.1 1.6000e- 1 1.4500e- 1.2200e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1 1.1000e- 1.1000e- I 1 1.7431 I 1.7431 1 3.0000e- 1 3.0000e- : 1.7534 1 :' 004 I 003 I 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 : 1 I I 005 I 005 1 1 'I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 , . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1146 0.9798 0.4197 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.266 1,250.266 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.696 003 4 4 1 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 8.9995 i 3.9135 i 23.0563 i 0.0245 i i 0.4154 i 0.4154 i i 0.4154 0.4154 : 0.0000 i 4,718.741 :4,718.741 i 0.1271 : 0.0858 i 4,747.486 9 I I I I I I I I I I• I 8 1 8 I 1 8 .1 I I I I I I I I • I I 1 Unmitigated • 8.9995 • 3.9135 • 23.0563 • 0.0245 • • 0.4154 • 0.4154 • • 0.4154 • 0.4154 • 0.0000 •4,718.741 •4,718.741 • 0.1271 • 0.0858 •4,747.486 8 8 8 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.6460 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating :: I I •i I I I I I I 1 I • • I I 1 v J J Consumer 9 7.2748 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i i 1 0.0000 Products :: I I I '� I I I I I I I I ei • , I I 1 Hearth 9 0.4290 i 3.6660 : 1.5600 i 0.0234 i : 0.2964 i 0.2964 : i 0.2964 0.2964 • 0.0000 4,680.000:4,680.000 i 0.0897 : 0.0858 14,707.810 'I I I I I I I I I , 0 I 0 I I 1 9 'I I I I I I I 1 I • , I I 1I •I J J J I 1 Landscaping 9 0.6498 i 0.2475 1 21.4963 i 1.1400e- i 1 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 : 1 39.6759 1 •I I I I 003 I I I I I I I I Total 8.9995 3.9135 23.0563 0.0245 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 4,718.741 4,718.741 0.1271 0.0858 4,747.486 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Architectural •; 0.6460 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • i : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I '� 1 I I I I I 1 I , I 1 I I ,� I 1. J J J Consumer .1 7.2748 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 . i : 0.0000 i i I 0.0000 Products •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I I '� 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 ;I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Hearth •1 0.4290 i 3.6660 : 1.5600 i 0.0234 i 1 0.2964 i 0.2964 : i 0.2964 0.2964 : 0.0000 i 4,680.000:4,680.000 i 0.0897 1 0.0858 :4,707.810 •1 I I I I I I I • : 0 : 0 : 1 1 9 •l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 . J •J J J J J J J 7 J J J Landscaping •1 0.6498 : 0.2475 : 21.4963 : 1.1400e- : : 0.1190 i 0.1190 : : 0.1190 0.1190 I i 38.7418 : 38.7418 : 0.0374 1 i 39.6759 •1 I I I 003 I I I I • •1 I I I I I . 1 1 1 Total 8.9995 3.9135 23.0563 0.0245 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.4154 0.0000 4,718.741 4,718.741 0.1271 0.0858 4,747.486 8 8 8 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 54 Date: 3/15/2022 1:31 PM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Equipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Attachment D SWAP E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Matthew F.Hagemann,P.G.,C.Hg.,QSD,QSP Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert Industrial Stormwater Compliance CEQA Review Education: M.S.Degree,Geology,California State University Los Angeles,Los Angeles,CA,1984. B.A.Degree,Geology,Humboldt State University,Arcata,CA,1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy,contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance,and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.For the past 15 years,as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist,and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste,air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner,Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise(SWAPE)(2003-present); • Geology Instructor,Golden West College,2010-2104,2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst,Komex H2O Science,Inc.(2000--2003); • Executive Director,Orange Coast Watch(2001-2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist,National Park Service,Water Resources Division(1998-2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member,San Francisco State University,Department of Geosciences(1993- 1998); • Instructor,College of Marin,Department of Science(1990-1995); • Geologist,U.S.Forest Service(1986-1998);and • Geologist,Dames&Moore(1984-1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE,Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste,water resources, water quality,air quality,greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis,sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities. • Expert witness on numerous cases including,for example,perfluorooctanoic acid(PFOA) contamination of groundwater,MTBE litigation,air toxins at hazards at a school,CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation,and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. With Komex H2O Science Inc.,Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S.EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive,electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use,research,and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive,electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use,research,and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment,results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses,Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater.Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality,including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield,and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport,ensured adequacy of monitoring networks,and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment,soil,and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues,wrote technical guidance,and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S.EPA workgroups,including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.He prepared geologic reports,conducted 3 public hearings,and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities,mine reclamation,and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote"part B"permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality,including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA,RCRA,NEPA,NRDA,and the Clean Water Act to control military,mining,and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks,including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee,a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles,these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance,including the Office of Research and Development publication,Oxygenates in Water:Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 4 principles into the policy-making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. Geology: With the U.S.Forest Service,Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range.Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field,and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford,Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: • Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests. • Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998,Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: • At San Francisco State University,held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology,oceanography(lab and lecture),hydrogeology,and groundwater contamination. • Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach,California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017. Invited Testimony,Reports,Papers and Presentations: Hagemann,M.F.,2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference,Eugene,Oregon. Hagemann,M.F.,2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9,San Francisco,California. Hagemann,M.F.,2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation,Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005,Denver,Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas,NV(served on conference organizing committee). 5 Hagemann,M.F.,2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California,Los Angeles. Brown,A.,Farrow,J.,Gray,A.and Hagemann,M.,2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference,National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix,AZ(served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences,Irvine,CA. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting,Pechanga,CA. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives,Parker,AZ. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting,Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S.EPA Region 9. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate:A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. From Tank to Tap:A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S.EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. 6 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann,M.F.,2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage.Water Resources Division,National Park Service,Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage.Water Resources Division,National Park Service,Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting,Asheville,North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting,Las Vegas,Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station,Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons,Salt Lake City. Hagemann,M.F.,Fukunaga,G.L.,1996,The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui,Hawaii.Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting,Maui, October 1996. Hagemann,M.F.,Fukanaga,G.L.,1996,Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te rizati on and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California.Proceedings,California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater.California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 7 Hagemann,M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention...Proceedings,Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting,v.35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011. 8 Attachment E S WA P E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street,Suite 201 Santa Monica,California 90405 Attn:Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Mobil:(310)795-2335 Office:(310)452-5555 Fax:(310)452-5550 Email:prosenfeld@swape.com Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport&Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment&Remediation Specialist Education Ph.D. Soil Chemistry,University of Washington, 1999.Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration. M.S.Environmental Science,U.C.Berkeley, 1995.Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A.Environmental Studies,U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years' experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural,and military sources. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021 Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise(SWAPE);2003 to present;Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health;2007 to 2011;Lecturer(Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health;2003 to 2006;Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program;2002-2004;Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment,2001-2002;Research Associate Komex H2O Science,2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association,2002-2004;Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001;Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego,2000-2001;Remediation Project Manager Ogden(now Amec), San Diego,2000-2000;Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego,California, 1999—2000;Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996—1999; Scientist James River Corp.,Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber,Davenport,California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp.,California and USFS,Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St.Kitts,West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications: Remy,L.L.,Clay T.,Byers,V.,Rosenfeld P.E.(2019)Hospital,Health,and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires,Richmond,California 2007 and 2012.Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons,R.A., Seo,Y.Rosenfeld,P.,(2015)Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value.Journal of Real Estate Research.27(3):321-342 Chen,J.A,Zapata A.R., Sutherland A.J.,Molmen,D.R.,Chow,B. S.,Wu,L.E., Rosenfeld,P.E.,Hesse,R.C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science,8(6),622-632. Rosenfeld,P.E. &Feng,L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry,Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget,IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125. Feng, L.,Wu, C., Tam,L., Sutherland,A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry.Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17),319-327. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021 Tam L.K..,Wu C. D.,Clark J.J. and Rosenfeld,P.E. (2008).A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds,70,002252-002255. Tam L.K..,Wu C. D.,Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld,P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley,A.R. A. Scott,J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld,P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science& Technology 55(5),345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science& Technology 55(5),335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts:Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology.49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet(2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004.New Orleans,October 2-6,2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology.49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology,49(9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows,Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4),310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office,Publications Clearinghouse(MS-6), Sacramento,CA Publication#442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld,P.E.,and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application.Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4),363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research,73,388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(1-4),247-262. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021 Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond,Washington State. Rosenfeld,P.E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail.Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts,3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network,7(1). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil.Doctoral Thesis.University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County,California. Rosenfeld,P.E.(1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester&Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World.Bachelors Thesis.University of California. Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International,(May 9-10,2018)800 Fifth Avenue,Suite 101 Seattle,WA. Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara,CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston,MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston,MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting,Lecture conducted from Tuscon,AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States"Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams(AFFF)at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon,AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution.Lecture conducted from Tallinn,Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23'Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23'Annual International Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021 Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld,P.E.(October 15-18,2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23'Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane(TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS)Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego,CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego,CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 —25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia,PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel,Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27,2005).Fate,Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel,Marina Del Ray,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel,Virginia Beach,Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology,A National Problem and Unquantified Liability.National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel,Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021 Hagemann,M.F., Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D.and Rob Hesse(2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of tribal representatives.Lecture conducted from Parker,AZ. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando,FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties,Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane.National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants..Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum.Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel,Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable.Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association.Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association.Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld,P.E. and Grey,M.A. (November 11-14,2002).Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility.Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis,Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores,California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association.Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld,P.E.,and C.L.Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America.Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil.Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021 Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan,Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Teaching Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002.Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego,Ventura,and San Francisco.Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments,and Soil Stability. U.C.Berkeley,Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal:To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost.2001. Synagro Technologies,Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal:investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils.2000. King County,Depaitciient of Research and Technology,Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996. Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021 United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993 Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County,Illinois Martha Custer et al.,Plaintiff vs.Cerro Flow Products,Inc.,Defendants Case No.:No. 0i9-L-2295 Rosenfeld Deposition,5-14-2021 Trial,October 8-4-2021 In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois Joseph Rafferty,Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK, Case No.:No. 18-L-6845 Rosenfeld Deposition,6-28-2021 In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe,Plaintiff vs.Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail,Defendants Case No.:No. 17-cv-8517 Rosenfeld Deposition,5-25-2021 In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al.,Plaintiff vs.The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm,L.L.C.,Utah Shelter Systems,Inc. Case Number CV20127-094749 Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021 In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson,Jeremy et al Plaintiffs,vs. CNA Insurance Company et al. Case Number 1:17-cv-000508 Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021 In the Superior Court of the State of California,County of San Bernardino Gary Garner,Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs.BNSF Railway Company. Case No. 1720288 Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021 In the Superior Court of the State of California,County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs.Union Pacific Railroad,A Corporation,et al. Case No. 18STCV01162 Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020 In the Circuit Court of Jackson County,Missouri Karen Cornwell,Plaintiff vs.Marathon Petroleum,LP,Defendant. Case No.: 1716-CV10006 Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019 In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al,Plaintiffs, vs.United States Metals Refining Company et.al.Defendant. Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM Rosenfeld Deposition.6-7-2019 Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division MIT Carla Maersk,Plaintiffs, vs.Conti 168.,Schiffahrts-GMBH&Co.Bulker KG MS"Conti Perdido" Defendant. Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:1 5-CV-0023 7 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles—Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al.,vs.Ifran Khan et al.,Defendants Case No.:No.BC615636 Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles—Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al.vs El Adobe Apts.Inc.et al.,Defendants Case No.:No.BC646857 Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018;Trial 3-7-19 In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al.Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al.,Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ Rosenfeld Deposition,3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018 In The District Court Of Regan County,Texas, 112t Judicial District Phillip Bales et al.,Plaintiff vs.Dow Agrosciences,LLC,et al.,Defendants Cause No.: 1923 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al.,Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation,et al.,Defendants Cause No C12-01481 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017 In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County,Illinois Martha Custer et al.,Plaintiff vs.Cerro Flow Products,Inc.,Defendants Case No.:No. 0i9-L-2295 Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017 In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs.The BP Exploration et al.,Defendants Case:No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW Rosenfeld Deposition,4-22-2020 In The Superior Court of the State of California,For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber,Plaintiff vs.BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019(c/w BC582154) Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017,Trail 8-28-2018 In the Northern District Court of Mississippi,Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper,et al.,Plaintiffs, vs.Meritor Inc.,et al.,Defendants Case Number:4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2017 Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021 In The Superior Court of the State of Washington,County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al.,Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc.,Defendants Case No.:No. 13-2-03987-5 Rosenfeld Deposition,February 2017 Trial,March 2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California,County of Alameda Charles Spain.,Plaintiff vs.Thermo Fisher Scientific,et al.,Defendants Case No.:RG14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn,et al.,Plaintiffs vs.Doug Hoksbergen,et al.,Defendants Case No.:LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition,August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County,West Virginia Robert Andrews,et al.v.Antero,et al. Civil Action NO. 14-C-3 0000 Rosenfeld Deposition,June 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et.al.Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation,Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition:May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit,in and For Broward County,Florida Walter Hinton,et.al.Plaintiff,vs. City of Fort Lauderdale,Florida,a Municipality,Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition:December 2014 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al,Plaintiff,vs.Aruba et al,Defendant. Case Number cc-11-01650-E Rosenfeld Deposition:March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial:April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio John Michael Abicht,et al.,Plaintiffs, vs.Republic Services,Inc.,et al.,Defendants Case Number:2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons.w/2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama,Northern Division James K.Benefield,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.International Paper Company,Defendant. Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010,June 2011 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Drummond Company Inc., et al.,Defendants Civil Action No.CV 2008-2076 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010 In the United States District Court,Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Citgo Petroleum Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV1052 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009 Paul E.Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021 EXHIBIT D LOZEAU DRU RY. P T 510.935.4200 1939 Harrison Street,Ste.150 www.lozeaudrury.com F 510.936.4205 Oakland,CA 94612 victona@lozeaudrury.com _......441 Via E-mail and US Mail October 1, 2021 Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 vincent.acuna@cityofrc.us Re: Comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project (DRC2020-00440) Dear Mr. Acuna and Planning Commissioners: I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") prepared for the proposed Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project (DRC2020-0440), including all actions related or referring to the proposed construction, use, and maintenance of a 260-unit apartment community, located at 12901-12939 Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Project"). After reviewing the IS/MND, we conclude the IS/MND fails as an informational document, and that there is a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, we request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") prepare an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code ("PRC") section 21000, et seq. This comment has been prepared with the assistance of expert reviews by Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CIH, wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., and environmental consulting firm Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE"). Mr. Offerman's comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Mr. Smallwood's comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit B hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. SWAPE's comment and the consultants' curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit C hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 2 of 31 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project would involve the construction of a 260-unit apartment complex on 5.2 acres. Applicant is requesting to construct a mixed-use development comprising 259 residential units, 2 commercial units, and 1 live-work unit, and a Minor Exception to reduce the number of required parking stalls by 12% within the Community Commercial (CC) District. More specifically, the proposed Project would include the following elements: • Two four-story buildings, with a maximum height of 60 feet; • 259 apartment units, ranging from 715 square feet to 1,367 square feet; • 1 live-work unit, consisting of two stories and 1,570 square feet; • 3,339 square feet of commercial space (816 square feet in 1 live-work unit and 2,523 square feet of stand-alone commercial space); • 465 parking spaces, with 265 parking spaces located in a below-grade parking garage and the remaining 200 parking spaces located on a surface parking lot on the southern and eastern portions of the Project site; • Approximately 26 bicycle parking spaces; • Approximately 5,500 square feet of indoor amenity space, which includes a 1,600 square-foot lobby/leasing office, a 1,400 square-foot fitness center, and a 1,400 square-foot Club Room in the west building, and a 1,500 square-foot Business Center in the east building; • Two courtyards and a paseo, offering a pool and additional outdoor amenities; • Landscaping surrounding both buildings; • Sidewalks along Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; • Intersection improvements at Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard including lane modifications and restriping; • Creation of a bus stop in front of the Project on Foothill Boulevard; and • Undergrounding of existing Southern California Edison (SCE) overhead 12 kilovolt (kV) power lines along Etiwanda Avenue. IS/MND, p. 1-13. The Project site is located at 12901-12939 Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project site is bound by Foothill Boulevard, a vacant lot, and condominiums to the north; Etiwanda Avenue and a shopping center to the west; and residential single-family homes to the south and east. The 5.56-acre site comprises two parcels (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 0229-311-14 and 0229-311-15), which are currently vacant and undeveloped. II. LEGAL STANDARD As the California Supreme Court has held, "[i]f no EIR has been prepared for a Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 3 of 31 nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an EIR." Communities for a Better Env't v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, 319-320 (CBE v. SCAQMD) (citing No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75, 88; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491, 504-505). "Significant environmental effect" is defined very broadly as "a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment." Pub. Res. Code ("PRC") § 21068; see also 14 CCR § 15382. An effect on the environment need not be "momentous" to meet the CEQA test for significance; it is enough that the impacts are "not trivial."No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at 83. "The `foremost principle' in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language." Communities for a Better Env't v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 109 (CBE v. CRA). The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 (Bakersfield Citizens); Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927. The EIR is an "environmental `alarm bell' whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached the ecological points of no return." Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1220. The EIR also functions as a "document of accountability," intended to "demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action." Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392. The EIR process "protects not only the environment but also informed self-government." Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. An EIR is required if "there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment." PRC § 21080(d); see also Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. In very limited circumstances, an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement briefly indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR § 15371), only if there is not even a "fair argument" that the project will have a significant environmental effect. PRC, §§ 21100, 21064. Since "[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . . . has a terminal effect on the environmental review process," by allowing the agency "to dispense with the duty [to prepare an EIR]," negative declarations are allowed only in cases where "the proposed project will not affect the environment at all." Citizens of Lake Murray v. San Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440. However, mitigation measures may not be construed as project design elements or features in an environmental document under CEQA if such a mischaracterization is significant. See Lotus vs. Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645. A "mitigation measure" is a measure designed to minimize a project's significant environmental impacts, PRC § 21002.1(a), while a "project" is defined as including "the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 4 of 31 whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment." CEQA Guidelines § 15378(a). Unlike mitigation measures, project elements are considered prior to making a significance determination. Measures are not technically "mitigation" under CEQA unless they are incorporated to avoid or minimize "significant" impacts. PRC § 21100(b)(3). To ensure that the project's potential environmental impacts are fully analyzed and disclosed, and that the adequacy of proposed mitigation measures is considered in depth, mitigation measures that are not included in the project's design should not be treated as part of the project description. Lotus, 223 Cal.App.4th at 654-55, 656 fn.8. Mischaracterization of a mitigation measure as a project design element or feature is "significant," and therefore amounts to a material error, "when it precludes or obfuscates required disclosure of the project's environmental impacts and analysis of potential mitigation measures." Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 185. Where an initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, a mitigated negative declaration may be appropriate. However, a mitigated negative declaration is proper only if the project revisions would avoid or mitigate the potentially significant effects identified in the initial study "to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and...there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment." PRC §§ 21064.5 and 21080(c)(2); Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 331. In that context, "may" means a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. PRC §§ 21082.2(a), 21100, 21151(a); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927; League for Protection of Oakland's etc. Historic Res. v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904-05. Under the "fair argument" standard, an EIR is required if any substantial evidence in the record indicates that a project may have an adverse environmental effect—even if contrary evidence exists to support the agency's decision. 14 CCR § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 931; Stanislaus Audubon Society v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150-51; Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602. The "fair argument" standard creates a "low threshold" favoring environmental review through an EIR rather than through issuance of negative declarations or notices of exemption from CEQA. Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928. The "fair argument" standard is virtually the opposite of the typical deferential standard accorded to agencies. As a leading CEQA treatise explains: This 'fair argument' standard is very different from the standard normally followed by public agencies in making administrative determinations. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 5 of 31 Ordinarily, public agencies weigh the evidence in the record before them and reach a decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. [Citations]. The fair argument standard, by contrast, prevents the lead agency from weighing competing evidence to determine who has a better argument concerning the likelihood or extent of a potential environmental impact. The lead agency's decision is thus largely legal rather than factual; it does not resolve conflicts in the evidence but determines only whether substantial evidence exists in the record to support the prescribed fair argument. Kostka & Zishcke, Practice Under CEQA, §6.29, pp. 273-274. The Courts have explained that "it is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument exists, and the courts owe no deference to the lead agency's determination. Review is de novo, with a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review." Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928 (emphasis in original). CEQA requires that an environmental document include a description of the project's environmental setting or "baseline." CEQA Guidelines § 15063(d)(2). The CEQA "baseline" is the set of environmental conditions against which to compare a project's anticipated impacts. CBE v. SCAQMD, 48 Cal.4th at 321. CEQA Guidelines section 15125(a) states, in pertinent part, that a lead agency's environmental review under CEQA: ...must include a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time [environmental analysis] is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective. This environmental setting will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a Lead Agency determines whether an impact is significant. See Save Our Peninsula Committee v. County of Monterey (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 124-25 ("Save Our Peninsula"). As the court of appeal has explained, "the impacts of the project must be measured against the 'real conditions on the ground,- and not against hypothetical permitted levels. Id. at 121-23. III. DISCUSSION A. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have a Significant Health Risk Impact from its Indoor Air Quality Impacts. Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CIH, has conducted a review of the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project's indoor air emissions. Indoor Environmental Engineering Comments (September 24, 2021) (Exhibit A). Mr. Offermann concludes that it is likely that the Project will expose Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 6 of 31 residents and commercial/industrial employees of the Project to significant impacts related to indoor air quality, and in particular, emissions of the cancer-causing chemical formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann is a leading expert on indoor air quality and has published extensively on the topic. Mr. Offermann's expert comments and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A. Mr. Offermann explains that many composite wood products used in building materials and furnishings commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences, and hotels contain formaldehyde-based glues which off-gas formaldehyde over a very long time period. He states, "The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims." Ex. A, pp. 2-3. Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen. Mr. Offermann states that there is a fair argument that future residents and employees of the commercial spaces will be exposed to a cancer risk from formaldehyde of approximately 120 per million, assuming all materials are compliant with the California Air Resources Board's formaldehyde airborne toxics control measure. Id., pp. 4-5. This exceeds the South Coast Air Quality Management District's ("SCAQMD") CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk of 10 per million. Id., p. 4. Mr. Offermann also notes that the high cancer risk that may be posed by the Project's indoor air emissions likely will be exacerbated by the additional cancer risk that exists as a result of the Project's location near roadways with moderate to high traffic (i.e. Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, Interstate 15 freeway, Auto Club Speedway, etc.) and the high levels of PM 2.5 already present in the ambient air. Id., pp. 10-12. No analysis has been conducted of the significant cumulative health impacts that will result to future employees of the Project. Mr. Offermann concludes that these significant environmental impacts should be analyzed in an EIR and mitigation measures should be imposed to reduce the risk of formaldehyde exposure. Id., p. 5. Mr. Offermann identifies mitigation measures that are available to reduce these significant health risks, including the installation of air filters and a requirement that the applicant use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins in the buildings' interiors. Ex. A, pp. 12-13. The City has a duty to investigate issues relating to a project's potential environmental impacts, especially those issues raised by an expert's comments. See Cty. Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. Cty. of Kern, (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1597-98 ("under CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts"). In addition to assessing the Project's potential health impacts to residents Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 7 of 31 and employees, Mr. Offermann identifies the investigatory path that the City should be following in developing an EIR to more precisely evaluate the Projects' future formaldehyde emissions and establishing mitigation measures that reduce the cancer risk below the BAAQMD level. Ex. A, pp. 6-10. Such an analysis would be similar in form to the air quality modeling and traffic modeling typically conducted as part of a CEQA review. The failure to address the Project's formaldehyde emissions is contrary to the California Supreme Court's decision in California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 386 ("CBIA"). At issue in CBIA was whether the Air District could enact CEQA guidelines that advised lead agencies that they must analyze the impacts of adjacent environmental conditions on a project. The Supreme Court held that CEQA does not generally require lead agencies to consider the environment's effects on a project. CBIA, 62 Ca1.4th at 800-801. However, to the extent a project may exacerbate existing adverse environmental conditions at or near a project site, those would still have to be considered pursuant to CEQA. Id. at 801 ("CEQA calls upon an agency to evaluate existing conditions in order to assess whether a project could exacerbate hazards that are already present"). In so holding, the Court expressly held that CEQA's statutory language required lead agencies to disclose and analyze "impacts on a project's users or residents that arise from the project's effects on the environment." Id. at 800 (emphasis added). The carcinogenic formaldehyde emissions identified by Mr. Offermann are not an existing environmental condition. Those emissions to the air will be from the Project. Residents and commercial/industrial employees will be users of the Project. Currently, there is presumably little if any formaldehyde emissions at the site. Once the project is built, emissions will begin at levels that pose significant health risks. Rather than excusing the City from addressing the impacts of carcinogens emitted into the indoor air from the project, the Supreme Court in CBIA expressly finds that this type of effect by the project on the environment and a "project's users and residents" must be addressed in the CEQA process. The Supreme Court's reasoning is well-grounded in CEQA's statutory language. CEQA expressly includes a project's effects on human beings as an effect on the environment that must be addressed in an environmental review. "Section 21083(b)(3)'s express language, for example, requires a finding of a `significant effect on the environment' (§ 21083(b)) whenever the `environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly." CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800 (emphasis in original). Likewise, "the Legislature has made clear—in declarations accompanying CEQA's enactment—that public health and safety are of great importance in the statutory scheme." Id., citing e.g., §§ 21000, subds. (b), (c), (d), (g), 21001, subds. (b), (d). It goes without saying that the future residents and commercial/industrial employees of the Project are human beings and the health and safety of those residents and workers is as important to CEQA's safeguards as nearby residents currently living near the project site. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 8 of 31 Because Mr. Offermann's expert review is substantial evidence of a fair argument of a significant environmental impact to future users of the Project, an EIR must be prepared to disclose and mitigate those impacts. B. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Mitigate the Potential Adverse Impacts of the Project on Wildlife. Wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., concludes that the Project may have significant impacts on several special status species. An EIR is required to mitigate these impacts. Dr. Smallwood's conclusions were informed by wildlife biologist Noriko Smallwood's site visit in September 2021. Ms. Smallwood visited the site of the proposed Project on Dr. Smallwood's behalf for nearly 2 hours from 06:54 to 08:42 hours on September 4, 2021. Dr. Smallwood's expert comments and curriculum vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit B. The wildlife baseline relied upon by the IS/MND is woefully inadequate. Wildlife biologist Dr. Smallwood's review of the impacts to wildlife from the Project concluded that the Project may have significant impacts on several special- status species. An EIR is required to analyze these impacts. According to the IS/MND and Biological Resources Assessment ("BRA"), at least 49 special-status plant species and 52 special-status wildlife species have been documented within the Guasti and surrounding eight quadrangles. IS/MND, p. 4-14. A California Natural Diversity Database ("CNDDB") search also yielded four special-status species with occurrences that overlapped with the biological survey area ("BSA") used for the Project, which includes the entire Project site plus a surrounding 500-foot buffer. These special status species included the coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminates abdominalis), Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), and Parry's spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi). Id. While no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed within the BSA during the reconnaissance field survey for the Project site, "marginal habitat" for two special-status wildlife species, the Crotch bumble bee (Bombus crotchii) and western yellow bat (Lasiurus xanthinus), were identified during the database review is present in the biological survey area. Id. However, as Dr. Smallwood points out, the IS/MND fails to adequately address and mitigate Project impacts to special-status species. The IS/MND's baseline for biological impacts is inadequate, incomplete, and understates the biological values at the Project site for several reasons. See Ex. B, pp. 6-7. First, the IS/MND improperly relies on a single reconnaissance field survey that was insufficient and conducted using minimal effort at the most inappropriate time of the day. According to the IS/MND and BRA, a reconnaissance field survey was conducted by AECOM (2021) on September 24, 2020. See IS/MND, App. B, pp. 5-6. A botanist Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 9 of 31 visited the site for 90 minutes in the middle of the afternoon (14:00 to 15:30 hours), at a time when, as Dr. Smallwood points out, wildlife was least likely to be detected. Ex. B, p. 5 (citing IS/MND, App. B, p. 6). In fact, temperatures were reportedly 96° to 99° F, which Dr. Smallwood explains is "too hot for a wildlife survey." Id., p. 5 (citing IS/MND, App. B, p. 6). The IS/MND reports that "no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed within the biological survey area during the reconnaissance field survey." IS/MND, p. 4-14. However, Dr. Smallwood notes that "this report follows from a survey of insufficient effort at the most inappropriate time of day," and as a result, "there should be no surprise that special-status species were undetected." Ex. B, p. 5. Because the IS/MND fails to report which, if any, species of wildlife were detected by the botanist, Dr. Smallwood finds this lack of reporting suggests that "the botanist likely saw no wildlife in the heat of the middle of the afternoon." Id. Consequently, whether the BRA is substantial evidence is not apparent from the face of the document or the IS/MND. Second, the IS/MND misuses the CNDDB. Ex. B, p. 6. When discussing that the CNDDB search yielded four special-status species—i.e. coast horned lizard, Delhi Sands flower-loving fly, Los Angeles pocket mouse, and Parry's spineflower—with occurrences that overlapped the BSA, the IS/MND states that "the CNDDB records of these four species had non-specific locations which were not mapped precisely to the locations where the species were observed and each individual observation is a square mile or greater in size; so it is not known whether the observation was actually made precisely within the biological survey area." IS/MND, p. 4-14. However, this statement is flawed. As Dr. Smallwood explains, "CNDDB records are mapped accurately, but exact locations are often not shared publicly as a means to protect the species." Ex. B, p. 6. According to Dr. Smallwood: CNDDB records are intended to indicate the likelihood of occurrence of a special-status species in the project area, but not the species' exact locations. Nor is CNDDB intended to support determinations of species' absence, as the IS/MND implies. CNDDB is intended to flag the occurrences of species in the area, not to provide an exact accounting of where the species is located at the moment. Id. Additionally, the IS/MND further misrepresents CNDDB by implying that the older records are dismissible. See id. The IS/MND states that "...CNDDB records that overlap with the biological survey area are 19 years old or more and since that time, the area has been developed substantially. As a result, it is possible many locations no longer exist. Current site conditions do not provide suitable habitat for these species and none are known to occur or expected to occur within the Project site or vicinity." IS/MND, p. 4- 14. Dr. Smallwood explains that this statement is a misrepresentation of CNDDB because: CNDDB does not imply that species are static, or that locations where they were mapped previously are the only locations where the species would be found later. Wildlife populations are spatially dynamic, shifting Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 10 of 31 centers of activity every generation or so (Taylor and Taylor 1979), so it would be inappropriate of CNDDB to assert that locations of past occupancy should still be locations of current occupancy. For this reason, users of CNDDB typically determine whether CNDDB records exist within a 5-mile radius of a proposed project. Occurrences within 5 miles serve as indicators that the species could also occur at the project site, and if so, then protocol-level detection surveys should be performed. Ex. B, p. 6. Given the paucity of the coast horned lizard, Delhi Sands flower-loving fly, Los Angeles pocket mouse, and Parry's spineflower in San Bernardino County, the Project's baseline should be informed by protocol level surveys that can determine the presence or absence of these species at the Project site. Third, the surveys conducted for the Project do not provide substantial evidence of the presence or absence of special-status species that are known in the vicinity. The IS/MND asserts that "the BSA generally does not provide suitable habitat for special- status wildlife species." IS/MND, p. 4-14. Dr. Smallwood states that "[t]his assertion, however, lacks evidence in the form of detection survey results." Ex. B, p. 6. According to Dr. Smallwood, detection surveys are designed by species' experts to provide "the best chance for detecting the targeted species by applying the methods and survey effort most likely to detect the species if it is indeed present." Id. Here, the botanist that was charged with surveying the Project site for 90 minutes in the middle of the hot afternoon failed "to come anywhere close to having performed a detection survey for any species of wildlife." Id. As a result, neither the IS/MND nor the BRA was justified in asserting that the Project site lacks special-status species of wildlife. Hence, Dr. Smallwood recommends that detection surveys should be performed, and subsequently assessed and reported in an EIR. Id., p. 22. Furthermore, due to the absence of detection surveys, the IS/MND only speculates that habitat is marginal and occurrence likelihoods low. Ex. B, pp. 6-7. Dr. Smallwood states that the "IS/MND repeatedly speculates that for this or that species, anthropogenic disturbances prevent their occurrences," such as the IS/MND exemplifying one such disturbance as routine mowing of the site. Ex. B, p. 6 (citing IS/MND, pp. 4-14-4-15). However, as Dr. Smallwood points out, "[t]he IS/MND offers no evidence in defense of its premise that routine mowing precludes special-status species of wildlife." Id., pp. 6-7. As evidence, Dr. Smallwood calls attention to the IS/MND's failure "to identify the Crotch bumble bee host plants that allegedly occur in low density," as well as "make the case that the host plants in question are the only plants useable by Crotch bumble bee." Id., p. 7 (citing IS/MND, p. 4-14). Such failures indicate that the IS/MND "relies on generalities rather than specifics, and on speculation rather than evidence." Id. Additionally, the IS/MND suggests that special-status species, such as the western yellow bat, were killed off by house cats, driven away by traffic noise, and inhibited by the low supply of insect prey. IS/MND, p. 4-15; Ex. B, p. 7. But as Dr. Smallwood notes, "[n]one of these suggestions are backed by evidence, and no effort has been made to actually look for special-status species on the site." Ex. B, p. 7. Dr. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 11 of 31 Smallwood refers to the IS/MND's discussion of the Crotch bumble bee as a prime example: In the case of the Crotch bumble bee, the IS/MND reports, "No bumble bee species were observed during the field survey." (There is only one species of Crotch bumble bee.) This reporting ignores the fact that Crotch bumble bees are unlikely to be out and about in the middle of the afternoon when temperatures range 96° to 99° F, as was reportedly the conditions during the one survey performed — a survey performed not by a wildlife ecologist or an entomologist, but by a botanist. The report of having not detected Crotch bumble bee was a meaningless report, and serves only to misrepresent how wildlife ecologists determine whether a species is present or likely absent from a site. Id., p. 7. As a result, the conclusion that the Project will not significantly impact the Crutch bumble bee and western yellow bat is not supported by substantial evidence and a fair argument exists that the Project may have significant impacts on the special- status species. Dr. Smallwood recommends that detection surveys for multiple special- status species of wildlife be implemented to inform an EIR. Id., pp. 6, 22. Only with an accurate baseline could the IS/MND purport to assess the impacts on these special- status species. Fourth, in addition to these inadequate survey methods and unidentified baselines, the IS/MND and its BRA understate the range of animal species that are likely present on the Project site. While the IS/MND's BRA determines occurrence likelihood to be low for the western yellow bat and Crotch bumble bee, its determinations for all other species is unreported. IS/MND, App. B, pp. 8-9. The BRA refers the reader to Appendix D for determination of all species to be considered, but Appendix D is empty on the copy of the BRA report downloaded from City of Rancho Cucamonga's website. See id., p. 8 & Appendix D. Contrary to the IS/MND and BRA reports, Dr. Smallwood's review of eBird and iNaturalist identified no less than 60 special-status species of vertebrate wildlife and the Crotch bumble bee as having been seen very close to the project site, seen nearby, seen within the region, or whose geographic range overlaps the project site. Ex. B, pp. 7, 8-10 (Table 2) (listing species that Dr. Smallwood considers potentially occurring on the project site at one time or another or periodically). Ms. Smallwood also detected 24 species of vertebrate wildlife during her 108- minute site visit on September 4, 2021 . See Ex. B, p. 3 (Table 1) (listing species of wildlife Noriko Smallwood observed from 06:54 to 08:42 hours on 4 September 2021 at the proposed Project site). She saw Cooper's hawk and American kestrel (Photos 2 and 3, p. 3), California scrub-jays and American crows (Photos 4 and 5, p. 4), Say's phoebe and a great blue heron (Photos 6 and 7, p. 4), and side-blotched lizard and California ground squirrel (Photos 8 and 9, p. 5), among other species. Id., pp. 2-5. Based on Ms. Smallwood's observations, Dr. Smallwood writes: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 12 of 31 [Ms. Smallwood's] survey outcome indicates that the site of the proposed project continues to serve as valuable habitat to at least 24 species of vertebrate wildlife, and it likely serves as habitat to many more species. It also holds the potential to produce many new birds, mammals and reptiles for years to come. A fair argument can be made for the need to more rigorously survey the site for wildlife, and for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze potential project impacts to wildlife Id., p. 2. Furthermore, Dr. Smallwood points out the significance of Ms. Smallwood's observance of California ground squirrels on the adjacent property across the street from the Project site. Dr. Smallwood states: Ms. Smallwood's detection of California ground squirrels on the open field across the street indicates that ground squirrels likely also occur on the project site. The occurrence of ground squirrels in the project area is significant because many special-status species are found in association with ground squirrels and their burrow complexes. Ground squirrels are prey of large raptors such as bald eagle, golden eagle, ferruginous hawk and Swainson's hawk. Ground squirrels are also prey of terrestrial carnivores such as American badger, which specialize on ground squirrels. Ground squirrels also construct subterranean habitat used by many species such as burrowing owl. The occurrence of ground squirrel warrants detection surveys for multiple special-status species that associate with this species. Id., p. 5. Moreover, "[b]ecause ground squirrels occur in the project area," Dr. Smallwood also recommends that "breeding-season burrowing owl surveys need to be implemented (CDFW 2012)," but only "implemented prior to the circulation of an EIR to more appropriately address potential impacts to burrowing owls and mitigation of those impacts." Id. p. 22. Thus, given the close proximity of these special-status species, the IS/MND fails as a matter of law to analyze the impacts to these species and their habitat. In conclusion, the IS/MND's failure to adequately evaluate the significance of the impacts to special-status species of wildlife violates CEQA. Thus, the Project requires an EIR to properly mitigate wildlife impacts of the Project. ii. The IS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impact on loss of breeding capacity. Neither the IS/MND nor the BRA assess the lost breeding capacity of birds that would result from the Project. See Ex. B, pp. 7, 11. In so doing, the IS/MND fails to analyze the impact of habitat loss, or the loss of productive capacity on bird species likely to nest on the ground and in trees within the BSA. Id., p. 7. While habitat loss Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 13 of 31 results in the immediate numerical decline of birds and other animals, it also results in a permanent loss of productive capacity. Id. Dr. Smallwood cites a recent study that documented a "29% decline in overall bird abundance across North America over the last 48 years," a decline which he says was "driven by multiple factors, but principally attributed to habitat loss and habitat fragmentation." Id. (citing Rosenberg et al. 2019). Here, the IS/MND and BRA identify only mourning dove as a bird species likely to nest on the ground, and only house finch, northern mockingbird, and California scrub- jay as species likely to nest in trees in the area. IS/MND, p. 4-15; IS/MND, App. B, p. 9. In reality, however, Dr. Smallwood reports that "many more species of birds are capable of nesting on and around the project site," especially since a lot of bird species are considered ground-nesters. Ex. B, p. 7. Dr. Smallwood cites two studies that show bird nesting densities that were between 32.8 and 35.8 bird nests per acre, for an average of 34.3 bird nests per acre. Id. (citing Young (1948) and Yahner (1982), respectively). Assuming nesting density at the Project site is a fifth of the 34.3 average reported, then 6.8 bird nests per acre multiplied by the Project's 5.2 acres of habit, Dr. Smallwood predicts that 35 bird nests produce new birds at the site annually. Id., p. 11. Based on an average of 2.9 fledglings per nest, the Project would prevent the production of 102 new birds per year. Id. (citing Young (1948)). Based on Dr. Smallwood's calculations, "[a]fter 100 years and further assuming an average bird generation time of 5 years, the lost capacity of both breeders and annual fledgling production would total 11,600 birds." Id. (emphasis added). The potential loss of 11,600 birds in California over the first century following construction of this Project easily qualifies as a significant and substantial impact that has not been analyzed. An EIR is required to fully analyze the Project's impact on lost breeding capacity, and to mitigate that impact. Dr. Smallwood recommends, at a minimum, substantial compensatory mitigation is needed in response to the Project's impacts from habitat loss, including impacts to birds and bats using the site as stop-over or staging during migration. Ex. B, p. 22. iii. The IS/MND fails to address the Project's potential cumulative impacts on habitat fragmentation. The IS/MND does not assess the likelihood of cumulative impacts on wildlife, especially from habitat fragmentation in the vicinity. Ex. B, p. 11. In addition to habit loss, habitat fragmentation, known as the reduction of connectivity of remaining habitat patches on a landscape, can also further diminish the productive capacity of the Project site. Id. (citing Smallwood 2015). Habitat fragmentation has progressed rapidly around the Project site, which has led to a diminishing number of patches of open space in the area. Id. As a result, each of these patches of open space, including the Project's 5.2 acres, "is increasingly critical to the continued existence of many wildlife species." Id. Because a fair argument exists that developing a currently undeveloped site that is likely suitable habitat for many species of wildlife will further fragment wildlife habitat in this area, there is a fair argument that the Project may contribute to habitat Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 14 of 31 fragmentation. Thus, habitat fragmentation is a cumulative effect of this Project that should be analyzed in an EIR, and mitigated accordingly. See Ex. B, p. 22. iv. The IS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife movement. The IS/MND fails to address impacts to wildlife movement, and instead looks for impacts to a wildlife corridor. See IS/MND, pp. 4-16-4-17; Ex. B, p. 11. In doing so, the IS/MND improperly dismisses the Project's potential to significantly impact wildlife movement reasoning that the BSA "occurs within an industrial center of the Los Angeles Basin and does not occur within a recognized/established regional wildlife corridor or wildlife nursery site," and "as a result, direct impacts to a regional wildlife movement corridor would not occur." IS/MND, App. B, pp. 10-11; Ex. B, p. 11. These conclusions rely on a false CEQA standard. Ex. B, p. 11. As Dr. Smallwood states, "[t]he primary phrase of the CEQA standard goes to wildlife movement regardless of whether the movement is channeled by a corridor." Id.; see also CEQA Guidelines, App. G, pp. 333-34 (stating that the CEQA significance threshold is whether, among other things, a project will "[i]nterfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species...."). Impacts to wildlife movement may occur with or without the presence of a wildlife corridor. Ex. B, p. 11. Dr. Smallwood writes: A site such as the proposed project site is critically important for wildlife movement because it composes one of the last of a diminishing suite of open space patches within a growing expanse of anthropogenic uses, forcing more species of birds to use the site for stopover and staging during migration, dispersal, and home range patrol (Warnock 2010, Taylor et al. 2011, Runge et al. 2014). Id., p. 11. Hence, the Project "would cut birds and bats off from stopover, roosting and staging opportunities, forcing them to travel even farther between remaining stopover areas along migration routes." Id. Because the Project would interfere with wildlife movement in the region, Dr. Smallwood agrees that an EIR needs to be prepared to address the Project's impacts on wildlife movement in the region. Moreover, the Project site is located within the Pacific Flyway, which is one of four major North American migration routes for birds. While migratory birds travel the flyway on their annual north-south migration, they stopover at areas with suitable habitat and food supplies. As the IS/MND's BRA notes, many birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act ("MBTA") and California Fish and Game Code ("CFGC") §§ 3503-3503.5 "are likely to use the BSA for breeding, migratory stopovers, and local dispersal." IS/MND, App. B, p. 9 (emphasis added). However, no analysis of any direct impacts to wildlife movement, including birds' stop-over habitat, is included in the IS/MND and its appendix. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 15 of 31 Lastly, the IS/MND and BRA acknowledge that construction from the Project would have indirect impacts on wildlife movement, stating that the Project's "construction activities (i.e., increased noise, human presence, vibration) would likely result in wildlife avoidance of the area during the construction time frame." Id. at 11-12 (emphasis added). Such indirect and direct impacts could significantly affect wildlife movement, and should be addressed in an EIR and mitigated accordingly. Dr. Smallwood recommends, at a minimum, substantial compensatory mitigation is needed in response to the Project's impacts from interference with wildlife movement, including impacts to birds and bats using the site as stop-over or staging during migration. Ex. B, p. 22. v. The IS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife by window collisions. Dr. Smallwood's report concludes that the Project will have significant impact on birds as a result of window collisions. See Ex. B, pp. 12-18. But neither the IS/MND nor the BRA express any concern about bird-window collision impacts, nor do they propose any mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for such impacts to special- status species of bird. Id., p. 12. Analyzing the potential impact on wildlife due to window collisions is especially important because "[w]indow collisions are often characterized as either the second or third largest source or human-caused bird mortality." Id. According to Dr. Smallwood, the Project's buildings, at 60 feet tall, would extend into much of the bird traffic observed by Ms. Smallwood at the Project site on September 4, 2021. Id. The IS/MND's rendering of the project shows facades composed of extensive structural glass, which Dr. Smallwood notes, "would introduce substantial collision hazards to an aerosphere that currently provides critically important habitat to birds, and which would act as lethal traps to flying birds." Id. Moreover, hundreds of thousands of birds migrate along the Pacific Flyaway, and Ms. Smallwood's observations at the time of her site visit further confirmed that birds fly through the Project's airspace, even during the nonmigratory season. Id. Based on Dr. Smallwood's review, at least 47 special-status species of bird are known to the Project area, see id. pp. 8-10 (Table 2), most of which "have been documented as window collision fatalities and are therefore susceptible to new structural glass installations." Id., p. 12 (citing Supplemental Material to Basilio et al. 2020; Smallwood unpublished review). Dr. Smallwood reviewed a number of studies in order to calculate the number of bird collisions that would occur annually as a result of the Project. Ex. B, p. 13. According to his calculations, each m2 of glass would result in an average of 0.073 bird deaths per year. Id. Dr. Smallwood then looked at the building design for the Project and estimated the Project would include at least 3,196 m2 of glass on its facades. Based on the estimated 3,196 m2 of glass on its façades and the 0.073 bird deaths per year, Dr. Smallwood estimates that the Project would result in at least 234 bird deaths Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 16 of 31 per year. Id. Even more significant is the 100-year toll from this average annual fatality rate, which would be at least 23,363 bird deaths. Id. As Dr. Smallwood correctly points out, "[i]f the project moves forward as proposed, and annually kills 234 birds protected by state and federal laws, then the project would cause significant unmitigated impacts." Id. Considering the list of bird-window collision factors that Dr. Smallwood stressed should be used to formulate a bird-safe plan for the proposed Project, Ex. B, pp. 13-17, 22-23, he has suggested a number of mitigation measures. Id., pp. 17-18. As a starting point, before construction, [a]ny new project should be informed by preconstruction surveys of daytime and nocturnal flight activity." Id., p. 17. Dr. Smallwood explains: [Preconstruction] surveys can reveal the one or more facades facing the prevailing approach direction of birds, and these revelations can help prioritize where certain types of mitigation can be targeted. It is critical to formulate effective measures prior to construction, because post- construction options will be limited, likely more expensive, and probably less effective. Id., p. 17. However, with regard to most of the known or suspected collision risk factors that Dr. Smallwood lists, he warns that "the proposed project's design remains insufficiently described to determine the degree to which the project would contribute to relative collision risk." Id. Therefore, Dr. Smallwood suggests the following: Focused study of birds in the area could reduce the uncertainty of potential project impacts. Such studies could make use of radar (Gauthreaux et al. 2008) or visual scan surveys (Smallwood 2017). Key information useful for impacts assessment and mitigation would include intensity and timing of bird traffic, heights above ground, travel trajectories, and specific behaviors of birds in flight. Id. Dr. Smallwood also notes the importance of post-construction fatality monitoring, which he says "should be an essential feature of any new building project." Id. In addition, for mitigation measures involving the siting and design of the Project, Dr. Smallwood suggests: (1) retrofitting to reduce impacts by marking windows, managing outdoor landscape vegetation, managing indoor landscape vegetation, and managing nocturnal lighting; (2) siting and designing to minimize impacts by deciding on location of structure, deciding on facade and orientation, selecting type and sizes of windows, designing to minimize transparency through two parallel façades, designing to minimize views of interior plants, and landscaping to increase distances between windows and trees and shrubs; and (3) monitoring for adaptive management to reduce impacts by systematic monitoring for fatalities to identify seasonal and spatial patterns, and adjusting light management, window marking, and other measures as needed. Ex. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 17 of 31 B, pp. 17-18. Dr. Smallwood also recommends that the use of compensatory mitigation be incorporated at any new building project. Id., p. 23. Thus, because many birds can be expected to be killed by windows of the Proposed project, a fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to adequately address and mitigate this potential impact. vi. The IS/MND fails to address the Project's potential significant impacts on wildlife from additional traffic generated by the Project. Dr. Smallwood identifies the serious impacts that increased traffic has on wildlife. Ex. B, pp. 18-20. Analyzing the potential impact on wildlife due to vehicle collisions is especially important because "traffic impacts have taken devastating tolls on wildlife," across North America. Id., p. 18 (citing Forman et al. 2003). In the United States alone, estimates for "avian mortality on roads is 2,200 to 8,405 deaths per 100 km per year, or 89 million to 340 million total per year." Id. (citing Loss et al. 2014). As Dr. Smallwood explains: Vehicle collisions have accounted for the deaths of many thousands of reptile, amphibian, mammal, bird, and arthropod fauna, and the impacts have often been found to be significant at the population level (Forman et al. 2003). Increased use of existing roads will increase wildlife fatalities (see Figure 7 in Kobylarz 2001). It is possible that project-related traffic impacts will far exceed the impacts of land conversion to residential use for a warehouse. Id., pp. 18-19. Furthermore, a recent study conducted on traffic-caused wildlife mortality found "1,275 carcasses of 49 species of mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles over 15 months of searches along a 2.5 mile stretch of Vasco Road in Contra Costa County, California." Id., p. 18 (citing Mendelsohn et al. 2009). Hence, as Dr. Smallwood points out, an analysis is needed to determine whether increased traffic generated by the Project would result in impacts to local wildlife. Id., p. 19. The IS/MND anticipates that the proposed Project would generate an average of 16,382 daily miles traveled, which translates to 5,979,430 annual vehicle miles traveled. IS/MND, pp. 4-9, 4-23; Ex. B, p. 18. The additional 16,382 daily miles traveled that is expected from the Project will undoubtedly result in collisions with wildlife. Ex. B, p. 19. As Dr. Smallwood explains, this additional 16,382 daily miles driven as a result of the Project is "a lot of mileage to be driven at great peril to wildlife that must cross roads to go about their business of foraging, patrolling home ranges, dispersing and migrating." Id. (citing Photos 10 and 11, Ex. B, pp. 19-20). However, "[d]espite the obvious risk to wildlife, and despite the multiple papers and books written about this type of impact and how to mitigate them, the IS/MND does not address impacts to wildlife caused by vehicles traveling to and from the Project site." Ex. B, p. 19. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 18 of 31 To predict the road mortality of wildlife vulnerable to front-end collisions and crushing under tires, Dr. Smallwood analyzed the data from the study of traffic-caused wildlife mortality in Contra Costa County. Id., p. 20 (citing Mendelsohn et al. 2009). By inputting estimates of vehicle miles per wildlife fatalities calculated using the Contra Costa County study, i.e. 1,825 vehicle miles per fatality, Dr. Smallwood predicts: Based on the daily VMT predicted by the IS/MND, the project would generate 5,979,430 vehicle miles per year, which divided by the 1,825 miles per fatality, would predict 3,276 wildlife fatalities per year. Operations over 50 years would accumulate 163,820 wildlife fatalities. Ex. B, p. 20. Based on Dr. Smallwood's assumptions and calculations, the traffic generated by the Project would cause substantial, significant impacts to wildlife. Id. Dr. Smallwood also notes that "mitigation measures to improve wildlife safety along roads are available and are feasible," and therefore, "need exploration for their suitability with the proposed project." Id. Specifically, Dr. Smallwood suggests compensatory mitigation in the form of "funding research to identify fatality patterns and effective impact reduction measures," and "donations to wildlife rehabilitation facilities." Id., p. 23. Moreover, wildlife that will be run over by the Project's additional traffic may include special-status species of wildlife such as the coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii) and Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus). Although these two special-status species were not observed on the Project site during the reconnaissance field survey or Ms. Smallwood's site visit, the CNDDB search yielded occurrences for both the coast horned lizard and Los Angeles pocket mouse that overlapped with the Project's biological survey area. IS/MND, p. 4-14. Regardless of whether these special-status species appear on the Project site, they do cross roads over which traffic from the Project will travel. The IS/MND fails to recognize at all this potential significant impact of the Project. Because a fair argument exists that the Project may have a significant impact on wildlife in the vicinity, an EIR must be prepared to assess this impact and identify appropriate mitigation. vii. The IS/MND fails to adequately address the Project's potential cumulative impacts on wildlife. The IS/MND fails to adequately analyze the cumulative impacts to wildlife from the Project by improperly implying that cumulative impacts are in reality only residual impacts as a result of incomplete mitigation from project-level impacts. Ex. B, p. 21. For example, the IS/MND states: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 19 of 31 As previously discussed, impacts related to the proposed Project are less than significant or can be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The proposed Project's contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. IS/MND, p. 4-78. However, the IS/MND's implied standard is not the standard of cumulative effects required under CEQA. Ex. B, p. 21. CEQA defines cumulative impacts, and it outlines two general approaches for performing the required cumulative analysis. See 14 CCR § 15130; PRC § 21083(b)(2). According to Dr. Smallwood, cumulative effects for wildlife "can often be interpreted as effects on the numerical capacity (Smallwood 2015), breeding success, genetic diversity, or other population performance metrics expressed at the regional scale." Ex. B, p. 21 . Here, the IS/MND's cumulative "analysis" is based on flawed logic. The conclusion that the Project will have no cumulative impact because each individual impact has been reduced to a less-than-significant level relies on the exact argument CEQA's cumulative impact analysis is meant to protect against. The entire purpose of the cumulative impact analysis is to prevent the situation where mitigation occurs to address project-specific impacts, without looking at the bigger picture. This argument, applied over and over again, has resulted in major environmental damage, and is a major reason why CEQA was enacted. As the Court stated in CBE v. CRA: Cumulative impact analysis is necessary because the full environmental impact of a proposed project cannot be gauged in a vacuum. One of the most important environmental lessons that has been learned is that environmental damage often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources. These sources appear insignificant when considered individually, but assume threatening dimensions when considered collectively with other sources with which they interact. CBE v. CRA, 103 Cal.App.4th at 114 (citations omitted). Even if the IS/MND was applying the accurate CEQA standard, which would mean that the cumulative effects analysis would be nothing more than an analysis of mitigation efficiency, Dr. Smallwood points out "that none of the project-level impacts would be offset to any degree by the proposed preconstruction surveys to be performed for nesting birds." Ex. B, p. 21. Notwithstanding, the IS/MND misrepresented the standard and failed to perform an appropriate analysis. An EIR must be prepared to include an adequate, serious analysis of the Project's cumulative impacts on wildlife. viii. The pre-construction surveys identified in the IS/MND are not sufficient to address potential impacts to birds and bats that may be present at the site. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 20 of 31 Dr. Smallwood has reviewed the proposed wildlife impact mitigation identified in the IS/MND related to pre-construction surveys for nesting birds and roosting bats (i.e. Mitigation Measure BIO-1). See IS/MND, p. 4-15; Ex. B, pp. 21-22. Although Dr. Smallwood agrees with the need for pre-construction surveys for birds and bats at the Project site, he notes that pre-construction surveys will come too late either to disclose the Project's anticipated impacts or to fully mitigate impacts to birds and bats. Ex. B, p. 21. As Dr. Smallwood explains: Preconstruction surveys are not designed or intended to reduce project impacts, let alone to reduce impacts to less than significant levels; they are not even designed to assess impacts. Preconstruction surveys are only intended as last-minute, one-time salvage and rescue operations targeting readily detectable nests or individuals before they are crushed under heavy construction machinery. Because most special-status species are rare and cryptic, and because most species are expert at hiding their nests lest they get predated, most of them will not be detected by preconstruction surveys. Id., p. 21. By failing to determine the actual baseline of bird's and bat's reliance on the site for roosting, nesting, and foraging and instead waiting within seven days prior to the start of construction to determine what roosts, nests, birds, and bats may suffer impacts from the Project, the IS/MND fails to evaluate and mitigate the Project's potential significant impacts to nesting birds and bats. Dr. Smallwood recommends that detection surveys be implemented for the Project before pre-construction surveys are performed. Id., pp. 21-22. In addition to detection surveys and preconstruction surveys being performed, an EIR should be prepared detailing how the results of preconstruction surveys will be reported. Id., p. 22. C. The IS/MND Relied on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project Emissions and Thus Failed to Adequately Analyze the Project's Air Quality Impacts. The IS/MND for the Project relies on emissions calculated from CalEEMod.2016.3.2. IS/MND, p. 4-8; Ex. C, pp. 1-2. This model relies on recommended default values, or on site-specific information related to a number of factors. When more specific project information is known, the user may change the default values and input project-specific values, but CEQA requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. The model is used to generate a project's construction and operational emissions. SWAPE reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files and found that the values input into the model were inconsistent with information provided in the IS/MND, resulting in an underestimation of the Project's emissions. Ex. C, p. 2. Because the IS/MND uses incorrect estimates for emissions, its air quality analysis and GHG emissions analysis cannot be relied upon to determine the Project's emissions. The particular errors identified by SWAPE are discussed below. These errors should be Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 21 of31 corrected in a subsequent CEQA document prior to approval of the Project. SWAPE's expert comments and curriculum vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit C. The IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated reduction of land use size. Based on the IS/MND, the Project proposes to build "259 apartment units, ranging from 715 square feet to 1,367 square feet." IS/MND, p. 1-13. Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the correct number of residential units (i.e. 259 apartments), but the incorrect square footage associated with the residential land use floor surface area (i.e. reduction of the default value of 259,000- to 228,000-SF). IS/MND, App. A, pp. 25, 29; IS/MND, App. F, pp. 23, 27; Ex. C, pp. 4-5. Further review of the model's output files indicates that the land use size was reduced from the CalEEMod default value without adequate explanation or justification. IS/MND, App. A, p. 29; IS/MND, App. F, p. 27; Ex. C, p. 5. The CalEEMod User's Guide requires that any changes to the default models be justified. Ex. C, p. 5 (citing CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, pp. 2, 9). According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "Site Plan; Project population." IS/MND, App. A, p. 25; IS/MND, App. F, p. 23. Given that the IS/MND states that the apartment units will range from 715-SF to 1,367-SF, the total square footage of the residential space will range from 185,185- SF to 354,053-SF. Ex. C, p. 5. However, the IS/MND fails to explicitly state the total square footage of the residential land use, and therefore, the reduction to the default floor surface area is unsubstantiated. Id. This change also is not mentioned or justified in the IS/MND and associated appendices. SWAPE explains: This unsubstantiated reduction presents an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that go into the model's calculations. The square footage of a land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts). Ex. C, p. 5 (citing CalEEMod User Guide, p. 28). By including an unsubstantiated reduction to the floor surface area of the Project's residential units, the model underestimates the Project's construction-related and operational emissions, and thus, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id., p. 5. ii. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated reductions to architectural and area coating emission factors. Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alt Cuvee Mixed- Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default architectural coating emission factors. IS/MND, App. A, p. 27; IS/MND, App. F, p. 25; Ex. C, pp. 5-6. The Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 22 of 31 nonresidential exterior and interior architectural area coating emission factors were each reduced from the default 100 g/L to 50 g/L. IS/MND, App. A, p. 27; IS/MND, App. F, p. 25; Ex. C, pp. 5-6. The explanation provided in the file is: "SCAQMD Building Envelope 50 g/L." IS/MND, App. A, p. 26; IS/MND, App. F, p. 24; Ex. C, p. 6. But neither the IS/MND nor the associated appendices mention or justify these changes. According to SWAPE, these changes are unsupported for two reasons: First, the IS/MND and associated documents fail to mention the building envelope category of paint, and its associated VOC content limit of 50 g/L as required by SCAQMD Rule 1113, whatsoever. Second, the IS/MND and associated documents fail to explicitly require the Project to use only building envelope coatings during Project construction and operation of the proposed nonresidential land uses whatsoever. As such, we cannot verify that the revised values are accurate. Ex. C, p. 6. Such unsubstantiated reductions cause an issue because the model uses the architectural and area coating emission factors to calculate the Project's reactive organic gas/volatile organic compound ("ROG/VOC") emissions. Id. By including unsubstantiated reductions to the default architectural and area coating emission factors, the model could underestimate the Project's construction-related and operational ROG/VOC emissions. Id. Thus, the IS/MND's emissions for architectural and area coating should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. iii. The IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated reduction to gas fireplace values. Review of the CalEEMod output files for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model demonstrates a reduction to gas fireplaces values were manually altered to include no gas fireplaces. IS/MND, App. A, p. 28; IS/MND, App. F, p. 26; Ex. C, pp. 6-7. Neither the file nor the IS/MND and the associated appendices mention or justify these changes to the default values. Ex. C, p. 6. However, the IS/MND indicates that the east building would include a courtyard with an outdoor fireplace, meaning that at least one fireplace would be installed on the Project site. IS/MND, p. 1-13; Ex. C, p. 7. By including unsubstantiated reductions to the number of gas fireplaces, the model could underestimate the Project's area-source operational emissions, and thus, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Ex. C, p. 7. iv. The IS/MND relies on incorrect CO2 intensity factors. Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the CO2 intensity factors for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" and "Alta Cuvee Bus Bay" were officially reduced from 702.44- to 531 .98- and 471.24-pounds per megawatt hour ("Ibs/MWhr"), respectively. IS/MND, App. A, pp. 30, 91; IS/MND, App. F, pp. 28, 87; Ex. C, p. 2. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 23 of 31 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justifications for these changes are: • Electricity supplied by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility, which is not available as input selection. SCE used as surrogate • SB 100 mandates 44% renewable by end of 2024. SCE CO2 factor assumes 40% renewables when operations begin. SCE 2019 power mix = 36% renewables IS/MND, App. A, pp. 26, 91; IS/MND, App. F, pp. 23, 86. These justifications are insufficient. Ex. C, p. 2. Based on SWAPE's review of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2020 Power Content Label, the City's CO2 intensity factor is 630 lbs/MWhr, which means that the CO2 intensity factor is underestimated by approximately 98- and 159-lbs/MWhr, respectively. Id., pp. 2-3. Neither the IS/MND nor its associated appendices provide a citation or further justification for the updated carbon intensity factors. Such inconsistencies pose an issue because the model uses the CO2 intensity factor to calculate the Project's GHG emissions associated with electricity use. Id., p. 3. By including an underestimated carbon intensity factor, the models underestimate the Project's potential GHG emissions, and thus, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id. v. The IS/MND fails to model all required parking. Review of the CalEEMod output files for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" demonstrates that the required parking is underestimated in the model. IS/MND, App. A, p. 25; IS/MND, App. F, p. 23; Ex. C, pp. 3-4. According to the IS/MND, the Project is pending approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reduce the amount of required parking by 12%, from 526 to 465 spaces. IS/MND, p. 1-15, Table 1-2. However, this request is yet to be approved. Id., p. 1-15; Ex. C, p. 4. As SWAPE points out, "the model should have included the entire amount of required parking in order to conduct the most conservative analysis." Ex. C, p. 4. But review of the output files indicates that the Project's model only includes 465 parking spaces, rather than the 526 spaces required by the City. IS/MND, App. A, p. 25; IS/MND, App. F, p. 23; Ex. C, p. 4. Hence, the total amount of parking is underestimated by 61 spaces. Ex. C, p. 4. But this underestimation is incorrect since there is no way to verify whether the City will approve or deny the Project's requested parking exception. Id. As such, the potential underestimation affects CalEEMod calculations for the model's VOC emissions from architectural coatings and energy impacts. Id. By failing to include the entire amount of required parking spaces, the model underestimates the Project's construction-related and operational emissions, and thus, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 24 of 31 vi. The IS/MND relies on incorrect solid waste generation rates. Review of the CalEEMod output files for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" demonstrates that the solid waste generation rates for that of the proposed Project were reduced in the model, and as a result, may underestimate the Project's emissions. IS/MND, App. A, p. 30; IS/MND, App. F, p. 28; Ex. C, pp. 7-8. The total solid waste generation rate was cumulatively decreased by 23.71 tons per year. Ex. C, p. 7. According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "Remove duplicate waste generation." IS/MND, App. A, p. 26; IS/MND, App. F, p. 24. But the IS/MND estimates that the proposed Project's "operational activities would generate approximately 1 .6 tons per day of solid waste during Project operation." IS/MND, p. 4-73 & n.99. Based on the solid waste generation rate that the IS/MND uses, the Project's operational activities would generate approximately 584 tons per year of solid waste. Ex. C, p. 8. However, the model's output files indicate that its emissions estimates for the Project's total solid waste generation of 123.6 tons per year, which includes 119.6 tons per year for 259 mid-rise apartments, 0.46 tons per year of solid waste for 1 live-work unit (referred to as a condo/townhouse by the model), 0.03 tons per year of solid waste for outdoor amenity space (referred to as a city park), and 3.51 tons per year of solid waste for the commercial space (referred to as a strip mall). IS/MND, App. A, p. 85; IS/MND, App. F, p. 82; Ex. C, p. 8. As SWAPE points out, the model's solid waste is underestimated by 460.4 tons per year, and therefore, inconsistent with information included in the IS/MND. Ex. C, p. 8. Compared to the solid waste generation rate used by the IS/MND, the Project's model relies on solid waste generation rates that are grossly underestimated, and as a result, the model underestimates the Project's GHG emissions from operational activities. Id. Thus, the IS/MND's emissions for solid waste should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id. vii. The IS/MND relies on the use of underestimated operational vehicle fleet mix percentages. Review of the CalEEMod output files for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" demonstrates that the operational vehicle fleet mix percentages were underestimated within the model, and as a result, may underestimate the Project's mobile-source operational emissions. IS/MND, App. A, pp. 28-29; IS/MND, App. F, pp. 26-27; Ex. C, pp. 9-10. According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justification for these changes is: "Residential Trips." IS/MND, App. A, p. 27; IS/MND, App. F, p. 25; Ex. C, p. 9. However, neither the file nor the IS/MND and the associated appendices mention or justify these changes to the default values with substantial evidence. Ex. C, pp. 9-10. By including unsubstantiated changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix percentages, the model could underestimate the Project's operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id., p. 10. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 25 of 31 viii. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated reductions to off-road equipment horsepower values. Review of the CalEEMod output files for the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" demonstrates several reductions to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values. IS/MND, App. A, p. 30; IS/MND, App. F, p. 28; Ex. C, pp. 10-11. According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justification for these changes is: "Project Inventory." IS/MND, App. A, p. 26; IS/MND, App. F, p. 24; Ex. C, p. 10. However, neither the file nor the IS/MND and the associated appendices mention or justify these changes to the default values with substantial evidence. Ex. C, p. 10. By including unsubstantiated changes to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values, the model could underestimate the Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Id., pp. 10-11. ix. The IS/MND relies on the incorrect application of construction-related mitigation measures. Review of the CalEEMod output files reveals that the model relies on an incorrect application of the construction mitigation measure of "Water Exposed Area." IS/MND, App. A, p. 30; IS/MND, App. F, p. 28; Ex. C, pp. 11-12. No adequate justification is provided in the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table for the inclusion of this specific mitigation measure. Ex. C, p. 11. Instead, the file mentions "SCAQMD Rule 403" as a "Construction Off-Road Equipment Mitigation." IS/MND, App. A, p. 24; IS/MND, App. F, p. 22; Ex. C, p. 11. However, neither the IS/MND nor the appendices include these as formal mitigation measures, which means they are project design features making it impossible to guarantee whether the measures used in the model would be implemented, monitored, or enforced. See IS/MND, pp. 5-1-5-4; Ex. C, pp. 11-12. By the IS/MND using the construction-related mitigation measures in the model, it is artificially reducing its emissions measures. Ex. C, p. 12. As a result, the model may underestimate the Project's construction emissions and the mitigation cannot be relied upon. Id. Thus, the design features should be included as mitigation measures. Id., p. 25. x. The IS/MND relies on the incorrect application of operational mitigation measures. Review of the CalEEMod output files reveals that the model also relies on an incorrect application of several operational mitigation measures related to energy (i.e. Exceed Title 24, Install High Efficiency Lighting, Install Energy Efficient Appliances), area (i.e. No Hearths Installed, Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies), and water (i.e. Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet, Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet, Use Water Efficient Irrigation System). IS/MND, App. A, pp. 72, 77, 79; IS/MND, App. F, pp. 70, 75, 77; Ex. C, pp. 12-14. The file provided no adequate justification for any of these operational mitigation measures used to reduce operational-related emissions as a result of the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 26 of 31 Project, but includes a justification in the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table for area-related operational mitigation measures, which is "SCAQMD Rule 1113." IS/MND, App. A, p. 27; IS/MND, App. F, p. 25; Ex. C, p. 13. However, neither the IS/MND nor the appendices include these as formal mitigation measures, meaning they are considered project design features, which makes it impossible to guarantee whether the measures used in the model would be implemented, monitored, or enforced. See IS/MND, pp. 5-1-5-4; Ex. C, pp. 13-14. By the IS/MND using the operational-related mitigation measures in the model, it is artificially reducing its emissions measures. Ex. C, pp. 13-14. As a result, the model may underestimate the Project's operational emissions and the mitigation cannot be relied upon. Id., p. 14. Thus, the design features should be included as mitigation measures. Id., p. 25. In conclusion, as a result of these errors in the IS/MND, the Project's construction-related and operational emissions were underestimated and cannot be relied upon to determine the significance of the Project's air quality impacts. D. An Updated Air Model Analysis Is Needed to Determine Whether the Project Will Have a Significant Air Quality Impact. Review of the IS/MND's air model analysis demonstrates that the IS/MND fails to provide summer and winter CalEEMod output files. Ex. C, pp. 14-15. To calculate the Project's air quality analysis, the IS/MND uses the CalEEMod.2016.3.2 to calculate construction-related and operational emissions. IS/MND, p. 4-8. According to SWAPE, the CalEEMod is required to provide three types of output files: annual, summer, and winter. Ex. C, p. 14 (citing CalEEMod User's Guide, p. 61). SWAPE further explains: As demonstrated above, the CalEEMod summer and winter output files provide peak daily emissions estimates in pounds per day ("lbs/day"). Furthermore, the IS/MND quantifies the Project's construction-related and operational maximum daily criteria air pollutant emissions and compares them to the applicable SCAQMD thresholds. Id., pp. 14-15 (citing IS/MND, pp. 4-8, Table 4.3-1; 4-9, Table 4.3-2). However, SWAPE's review of the IS/MND's air quality assessment and GHG assessment demonstrates that the IS/MND failed to disclose the summer and winter CalEEMod output files. Ex. C, p. 15. Because the IS/MND fails to provide the summer and winter output files, the IS/MND's air quality analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment, and properly disclose all CalEEMod output files. E. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Evaluate Health Risks from Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 27 of 31 One of the primary emissions of concern regarding health effects for land development projects is diesel particulate matter ("DPM"), which can be released during Project construction and operation. DPM consists of fine particles with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers including a subgroup of ultrafine particles (with a diameter less than 0.1 micrometers). Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and cancer-causing substances. Exposure to DPM is a recognized health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. According to the California Air Resources Board ("CARB"), DPM exposure may lead to the following adverse health effects: aggravated asthma; chronic bronchitis; increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations; decreased lung function in children; lung cancer; and premature deaths for those with heart or lung disease. The IS/MND concludes that the proposed Project would have a less-than- significant health risk impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis ("HRA"). Specifically, regarding potential health risk impacts associated with Project construction, the IS/MND justifies its "less-than-significant" health risk impact conclusion by stating that "low magnitude of diesel exhaust emissions from construction equipment combined with the brevity of the construction period and local meteorological characteristics indicate that the proposed Project would not generate substantial emissions over an extended period of time that could cause a health risk to adjacent land uses." IS/MND, p. 4-11. Additionally, the IS/MND claims that "the size of the Project site indicates that only during a limited portion of construction activities would heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment be operating within 100 feet of sensitive receptors, and all construction equipment would be maintained in accordance with the CARB Portable Engine Air Toxics Control Measure and the Off-Road Diesel Regulation to control emissions to the maximum extent feasible." Id. In addition, with regard to potential health risk impacts associated with Project operation, the IS/MND's justification is that "[o]peration of the proposed Project would not create a new substantial permanent source of air pollutant emissions to the Project area," because the Project "would be consistent with existing surrounding land use developments," and "does not involve large boilers, generators, or any other equipment or facilities that would warrant special permitting under SCAQMD regulations." Id., p. 4- 12. According to the IS/MND this means that operation of the Project "would not produce emissions capable of resulting in substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations." Id. However, SWAPE's review of the IS/MND and its evaluation of potential health risk impacts for the Project found that the IS/MND incorrectly concludes that the Project would have a less-than-significant health risk impact on nearby receptors, and completely failed to conduct a quantified construction or operational HRA. Ex. C, pp. 15- 17. SWAPE concluded that the IS/MND's evaluation of the Project's potential health impacts, as well as the less-than-significant health impact conclusion, is incorrect for several reasons. Id. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 28 of 31 First, the IS/ND fails to quantitatively evaluate construction-related and operational toxic air contaminants ("TACs"), or make a reasonable effort to connect emissions to health impacts posed to nearby existing sensitive receptors. Ex. C, p. 16. SWAPE identifies potential emissions from both the exhaust stacks of construction equipment and daily vehicle trips. Id. In failing to connect TAC emissions to potential health risks to nearby sensitive receptors, the Project fails to meet the CEQA requirement that projects correlate increases in project-generated emissions to adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions. Ex. C, p. 16. See Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 510. Second, by failing to prepare a quantified construction and operational HRA, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions that the Project would generate to the adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions. Ex. C, pp. 16-17. The IS/MND's conclusion is also inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Health Hazard Assessment's ("OEHHA") most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015. See "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. OEHHA recommends that projects lasting at least 2 months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors, a time period which this Project easily exceeds. Ex. C, p. 17. The OEHHA document also recommends that if a project is expected to last over 6 months, the exposure should be evaluated throughout the project using a 30-year exposure duration to estimate individual cancer risks. Id. Based on its extensive experience, SWAPE reasonably assumes that the Project will last at least 30 years, and therefore recommends that health risk impacts from the project be evaluated. Id. An EIR is therefore required to analyze these impacts. Id. Third, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors, SWAPE found that the IS/MND fails to compare the excess health risk impact to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million. Ex. C, p. 17. Thus, in accordance with the most relevant guidance, an assessment of the health risk posed to nearby existing receptors from Project construction and operation should have been conducted. F. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May have a Significant Health Risk Impact. Correcting the above errors, SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. Ex. C., pp. 17-21. SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from Project construction. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. SWAPE applied a sensitive receptor distance of 100 meters and Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 29 of 31 analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance utilizing age sensitivity factors. Id. SWAPE found that the excess cancer risks at a sensitive receptor located approximately 100 meters away over the course of Project construction are approximately 27.1 in one million for infants and 23.7 in one million for children. Id., p. 20. Moreover, the excess lifetime cancer risk over the course of a Project operation of 30 years is approximately 60 in one million. Id. The risks to infants, children, and lifetime residents appreciably exceed SCAQMD's threshold of 10 in one million. SWAPE's analysis constitutes substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant health impact as a result of diesel particulate emissions. A health risk assessment must be prepared disclosing the health risk impacts from toxic air contaminants. G. The IS/MND Failed to Adequately Analyze Greenhouse Gas Impacts and Thus the Project May Result in Significant Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions of 2,668 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year ("MT CO2E/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year. IS/MND, p. 4-31, Table 4.8-1. Furthermore, the IS/MND relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the San Bernardino Regional GHG Reduction Plan, and the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan ("CAP") in order to conclude that the Project would result in a less-than-significant GHG impact. IS/MND, pp. 4-31-4-32. However, SWAPE concludes that the IS/MND's GHG analysis, as well as its subsequent less-than-significant conclusion, is incorrect for several reasons. Ex. C, pp. 21-25. First, as SWAPE points out, the IS/MND's GHG analysis relies upon a flawed air model, as discussed above. Id., pp. 21-22. As a result, GHG emissions are underestimated and the IS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Second, the IS/MND utilizes an outdated GHG threshold. SWAPE notes that when compared to the correct quantitative threshold, the Project's GHG impacts are demonstrably significant. Id., p. 22. Third, SWAPE's updated analysis indicates a potential significant impact in GHG emissions. Id., pp. 22-23. As such, SWAPE recommends, "an updated GHG analysis using the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target should be prepared in an EIR and additional mitigation should be incorporated accordingly, per CEQA Guidelines." Id., p. 23. Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 30 of 31 Fourth, the IS/MND fails to consider the performance-based standards underlying CARB's Scoping Plan. Ex. C, pp. 23-24. Based on SWAPE's quantitative consistency evaluation utilizing these standards, SWAPE concluded that the IS/MND's GHG significance determination regarding the Project's consistency with applicable plans and policies should not be relied upon. Id., p. 24. Fifth, the IS/MND also fails to consider the performance-based standards underlying SCAG's RTP/SCS. Id., pp. 24-25. SWAPE's quantitative consistency evaluation utilizing these standards concludes that the IS/MND's GHG significance determination concerning the Project's consistency with applicable plans and policies should not be relied upon. Id., p. 25. SWAPE's analysis demonstrated a potentially significant health risk impact from the project that necessitates mitigation, and it proposes that the project design features that are incorrectly applied as mitigation measures by the model be implemented formally as mitigation measures in order to adequately reduce construction and operational emissions. In addition to implementing these measures, an EIR should be included with updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analysis. H. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have Significant Noise Impact. Review of the proposed Project and relevant appendices regarding the Project's noise impacts from construction activities provides substantial evidence that the IS/MND improperly analyzed construction noise levels and failed to adequately mitigate significant construction noise impacts. Based on the noise levels presented in the IS/MND, "the equipment is expected to generate noise levels ranging from approximately 70.3 dBA to 82.6 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet." IS/MND, p. 4-46— 4-47. The IS/MND notes that "construction noise levels would exceed the residential and commercial construction noise standards at the majority of nearby sensitive receptors," and as result, impacts related to on-site construction noise would be significant without mitigation. Id. at 4-47. Although the IS/MND concludes that mitigation measures included in the IS/MD will place noise impacts under significant thresholds, substantial evidence exists in the IS/MND and related appendix that demonstrates there still could be significant noise impacts despite the IS/MND's noise mitigation measures. As the court in Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency stated, the application of an established regulatory standard cannot be applied in a way that forecloses the consideration of any other substantial evidence showing there may be a significant effect. Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 114. The court in Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara also held that an EIR is required if substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the project may have significant unmitigated noise Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project October 1, 2021 Page 31 of31 impacts, even if other evidence shows that the project will not generate noise in excess of a noise ordinance. See Keep Out Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 714, 732. Thus, an EIR to analyze potentially unmitigated noise impacts is required. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the IS/MND for the Project should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, f.Ge Victoria Ann Yundt LOZEAU DRURY LLP Exhibit A H E E INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING H E E 1448 Pine Street,Suite 103 San Francisco,California 94109 Telephone:(415)567-7700 E-mail: offermann@IEE-SF.com http://www.iee-sf.com Date: September 24, 2021 To: Victoria A. Yundt Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, California 94612 From: Francis J. Offermann PE CIH Subject: Indoor Air Quality: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (IEE File Reference: P-4499) Pages: 19 Indoor Air Quality Impacts Indoor air quality (IAQ) directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants, and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a well-recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major high- performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014). Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors with the majority of this time spent at home (EPA, 2011). Some segments of the population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously. Additionally, an increasing number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek. Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments. The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain and release a variety of pollutants to air (Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson, 2011). With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants. Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Impact. In the California New Home Study (CNHS) of 108 new homes in California (Offermann, 2009), 25 air contaminants were measured, and formaldehyde was identified as the indoor air contaminant with the highest cancer risk as determined by the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a),No Significant Risk Levels (NSRL) for carcinogens. The NSRL is the daily intake level calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000 (i.e., ten in one million cancer risk) and for formaldehyde is 40 µg/day. The NSRL concentration of formaldehyde that represents a daily dose of 40 µg is 2 µg/m3, assuming a continuous 24-hour exposure, a total daily inhaled air volume of 20 m3, and 100% absorption by the respiratory system. All of the CNHS homes exceeded this NSRL concentration of 2 µg/m3. The median indoor formaldehyde concentration was 36 µg/m3, and ranged from 4.8 to 136 µg/m3, which corresponds to a median exceedance of the 2 µg/m3 NSRL concentration of 18 and a range of 2.3 to 68. Therefore, the cancer risk of a resident living in a California home with the median indoor formaldehyde concentration of 36 µg/m3, is 180 per million as a result of formaldehyde alone. The CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk is 10 per million, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD, 2015). Besides being a human carcinogen, formaldehyde is also a potent eye and respiratory irritant. In the CNHS, many homes exceeded the non-cancer reference exposure levels (RELs) prescribed by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2017b). The percentage of homes exceeding the RELs ranged from 98% for the Chronic REL of 9 µg/m3 to 28% for the Acute REL of 55 µg/m3. The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and 2 of 19 particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims. In January 2009, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an airborne toxics control measure (ATCM) to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, including hardwood plywood, particleboard, medium density fiberboard, and also furniture and other finished products made with these wood products (California Air Resources Board 2009). While this formaldehyde ATCM has resulted in reduced emissions from composite wood products sold in California, they do not preclude that homes built with composite wood products meeting the CARB ATCM will have indoor formaldehyde concentrations below cancer and non-cancer exposure guidelines. A follow up study to the California New Home Study (CNHS) was conducted in 2016- 2018 (Singer et. al., 2019), and found that the median indoor formaldehyde in new homes built after 2009 with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor formaldehyde concentrations, with a median indoor concentrations of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb) as compared to a median of 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. Unlike in the CNHS study where formaldehyde concentrations were measured with pumped DNPH samplers, the formaldehyde concentrations in the HENGH study were measured with passive samplers, which were estimated to under-measure the true indoor formaldehyde concentrations by approximately 7.5%. Applying this correction to the HENGH indoor formaldehyde concentrations results in a median indoor concentration of 24.1 µg/m3, which is 33% lower than the 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. Thus, while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 33% lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer risk, the median lifetime cancer risk is still 120 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood products. This median lifetime cancer risk is more than 12 times the OEHHA 10 in a million cancer risk threshold(OEHHA, 2017a). With respect to the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, Rancho Cucamonga, CA the buildings consist of residential and commercial spaces. 3 of 19 The residential occupants will potentially have continuous exposure (e.g. 24 hours per day, 52 weeks per year). These exposures are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in residential construction. Because these residences will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor residential formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 24.1 µg/m3 (Singer et. al., 2020) Assuming that the residential occupants inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 482 µg/day for continuous exposure in the residences. This exposure represents a cancer risk of 120 per million, which is more than 12 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. For occupants that do not have continuous exposure, the cancer risk will be proportionally less but still substantially over the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million (e.g. for 12/hour/day occupancy, more than 6 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million). The employees of the commercial spaces are expected to experience significant indoor exposures (e.g., 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year). These exposures for employees are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences and hotels. Because the commercial spaces will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 24.1 µg/m3 (Singer et. al., 2020) 4 of 19 Assuming that the employees of commercial spaces work 8 hours per day and inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the formaldehyde dose per work-day at the offices is 161 µg/day. Assuming that these employees work 5 days per week and 50 weeks per year for 45 years (start at age 20 and retire at age 65) the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 70.9 µg/day. This is 1.77 times the NSRL (OEHHA, 2017a) of 40 µg/day and represents a cancer risk of 17.7 per million, which exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. This impact should be analyzed in an environmental impact report ("EIR"), and the agency should impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce this impact. Several feasible mitigation measures are discussed below and these and other measures should be analyzed in an EIR. Appendix A, Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations and the CARB Formaldehyde ATCM, provides analyses that show utilization of CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials will not ensure acceptable cancer risks with respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products. Even composite wood products manufactured with CARB certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million. The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. The following describes a method that should be used, prior to construction in the environmental review under CEQA, for determining whether the indoor concentrations resulting from the formaldehyde emissions of specific building materials/furnishings selected exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines. Such a design analyses can be used to identify those materials/furnishings prior to the completion of the City's CEQA review 5 of 19 and project approval, that have formaldehyde emission rates that contribute to indoor concentrations that exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, so that alternative lower emitting materials/furnishings may be selected and/or higher minimum outdoor air ventilation rates can be increased to achieve acceptable indoor concentrations and incorporated as mitigation measures for this project. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment This formaldehyde emissions assessment should be used in the environmental review under CEQA to assess the indoor formaldehyde concentrations from the proposed loading of building materials/furnishings, the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate data for building materials/furnishings, and the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. This assessment allows the applicant (and the City) to determine, before the conclusion of the environmental review process and the building materials/furnishings are specified, purchased, and installed, if the total chemical emissions will exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, and if so, allow for changes in the selection of specific material/furnishings and/or the design minimum outdoor air ventilations rates such that cancer and non-cancer guidelines are not exceeded. 1.) Define Indoor Air Quality Zones. Divide the building into separate indoor air quality zones, (IAQ Zones). IAQ Zones are defined as areas of well-mixed air. Thus, each ventilation system with recirculating air is considered a single zone, and each room or group of rooms where air is not recirculated (e.g. 100% outdoor air) is considered a separate zone. For IAQ Zones with the same construction material/furnishings and design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. (e.g. hotel rooms, apartments, condominiums, etc.) the formaldehyde emission rates need only be assessed for a single IAQ Zone of that type. 2.) Calculate Material/Furnishing Loading. For each IAQ Zone, determine the building material and furnishing loadings (e.g., m2 of material/m2 floor area, units of furnishings/m2 floor area) from an inventory of all potential indoor formaldehyde sources, including flooring, ceiling tiles, furnishings, finishes, insulation, sealants, 6 of 19 adhesives, and any products constructed with composite wood products containing urea- formaldehyde resins (e.g., plywood, medium density fiberboard,particleboard). 3.) Calculate the Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each building material, calculate the formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) from the product of the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/m2-h) and the area (m2) of material in the IAQ Zone, and from each furnishing (e.g. chairs, desks, etc.) from the unit-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/unit-h) and the number of units in the IAQ Zone. NOTE: As a result of the high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014), most manufacturers of building materials furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers," (CDPH, 2017), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. Most manufacturers of building furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using ANSI/BIFMA M7.1 Standard Test Method for Determining VOC Emissions (BIFMA, 2018), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. CDPH, BIFMA, and other chemical emission rate testing programs, typically certify that a material or furnishing does not create indoor chemical concentrations in excess of the maximum concentrations permitted by their certification. For instance, the CDPH emission rate testing requires that the measured emission rates when input into an office, school, or residential model do not exceed one-half of the OEHHA Chronic Exposure Guidelines (OEHHA, 2017b) for the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017). These certifications themselves do not provide the actual area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (i.e., µg/m2-h) of the product, but rather provide data that the formaldehyde emission rates do not exceed the maximum rate allowed for the certification. Thus, for example, the data for a certification of a specific type of flooring may be used to calculate that the area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde is less than 31 µg/m2-h, but not the actual measured specific emission rate, which may be 3, 18, or 30 µg/m2-h. These area-specific emission rates determined 7 of 19 from the product certifications of CDPH, BIFA, and other certification programs can be used as an initial estimate of the formaldehyde emission rate. If the actual area-specific emission rates of a building material or furnishing is needed (i.e. the initial emission rates estimates from the product certifications are higher than desired), then that data can be acquired by requesting from the manufacturer the complete chemical emission rate test report. For instance if the complete CDPH emission test report is requested for a CDHP certified product, that report will provide the actual area- specific emission rates for not only the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017), but also all of the cancer and reproductive/developmental chemicals listed in the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), all of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) in the California Air Resources Board Toxic Air Contamination List (CARB, 2011), and the 10 chemicals with the greatest emission rates. Alternatively, a sample of the building material or furnishing can be submitted to a chemical emission rate testing laboratory, such as Berkeley Analytical Laboratory (https://berkeleyanalytical.com), to measure the formaldehyde emission rate. 4.) Calculate the Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the total formaldehyde emission rate (i.e. µg/h) from the individual formaldehyde emission rates from each of the building material/furnishings as determined in Step 3. 5.) Calculate the Indoor Formaldehyde Concentration. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) from Equation 1 by dividing the total formaldehyde emission rates (i.e. µg/h) as determined in Step 4, by the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate (m3/h) for the IAQ Zone. Cin= EtotalQoa (Equation 1) where: Cin= indoor formaldehyde concentration(µg/m3) Etotai=total formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) into the IAQ Zone. 8 of 19 Qoa=design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone (m3/h) The above Equation 1 is based upon mass balance theory, and is referenced in Section 3.10.2 "Calculation of Estimated Building Concentrations" of the California Department of Health"Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers", (CDPH, 2017). 6.) Calculate the Indoor Exposure Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Risks. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the cancer and non-cancer health risks from the indoor formaldehyde concentrations determined in Step 5 and as described in the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA, 2015). 7.) Mitigate Indoor Formaldehyde Exposures of exceeding the CEQA Cancer and/or Non-Cancer Health Risks. In each IAQ Zone, provide mitigation for any formaldehyde exposure risk as determined in Step 6, that exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million or the CEQA non-cancer Hazard Quotient of 1.0. Provide the source and/or ventilation mitigation required in all IAQ Zones to reduce the health risks of the chemical exposures below the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. Source mitigation for formaldehyde may include: 1.) reducing the amount materials and/or furnishings that emit formaldehyde 2.) substituting a different material with a lower area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde Ventilation mitigation for formaldehyde emitted from building materials and/or furnishings may include: 1.) increasing the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone. NOTE: Mitigating the formaldehyde emissions through use of less material/furnishings, or use of lower emitting materials/furnishings, is the preferred mitigation option, as 9 of 19 mitigation with increased outdoor air ventilation increases initial and operating costs associated with the heating/cooling systems. Further, we are not asking that the builder "speculate" on what and how much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers," (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier above (i.e. Pre- Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Impact. Another important finding of the CNHS, was that the outdoor air ventilation rates in the homes were very low. Outdoor air ventilation is a very important factor influencing the indoor concentrations of air contaminants, as it is the primary removal mechanism of all indoor air generated contaminants. Lower outdoor air exchange rates cause indoor generated air contaminants to accumulate to higher indoor air concentrations. Many homeowners rarely open their windows or doors for ventilation as a result of their concerns for security/safety, noise, dust, and odor concerns (Price, 2007). In the CNHS field study, 32% of the homes did not use their windows during the 24-hour Test Day, and 15% of the homes did not use their windows during the entire preceding week. Most of the homes with no window usage were homes in the winter field session. Thus, a substantial percentage of homeowners never open their windows, especially in the winter season. The median 24-hour measurement was 0.26 air changes per hour (ach), with a range of 0.09 ach to 5.3 ach. A total of 67% of the homes had outdoor air exchange rates below the minimum California Building Code (2001) requirement of 0.35 ach. Thus, the relatively tight envelope construction, combined with the fact that many people never open their windows for ventilation, results in homes with low outdoor air exchange rates and higher indoor air contaminant concentrations. 10 of 19 The Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, Rancho Cucamonga, CA is close to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g., I-15, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, etc.), and thus the Project site is likely a sound impacted site. According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM, 2021) the existing ambient noise levels in Table 4.13-1, range from 52.5 to 70.8 dBA Ley. There were no modeled future noise levels in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM, 2021). An acoustic study of the existing and projected future noise levels needs to be conducted to understand the ambient noise levels, Lam,, and prepare the necessary project mitigation. We note that Project's close proximity to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g., I-15, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, etc.) make this Project site a significantly sound impacted site. As a result of the high outdoor noise levels, the current project will require a mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation to allow for a habitable interior environment with closed windows and doors. Such a ventilation system would allow windows and doors to be kept closed at the occupant's discretion to control exterior noise within building interiors. PM2.5 Outdoor Concentrations Impact. An additional impact of the nearby motor vehicle traffic associated with this project, are the outdoor concentrations of PM2.5. According to the Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project, (AECOM, 2021) the Project is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5. An air quality analyses should to be conducted to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in the outdoor and indoor air that people inhale each day. This air quality analyses needs to consider the cumulative impacts of the project related emissions, existing and projected future emissions from local PM2.5 sources (e.g. stationary sources, motor vehicles, and airport traffic) upon the outdoor air concentrations at the Project site. If the outdoor concentrations are determined to exceed the California and National annual average PM2.5 11 of 19 exceedence concentration of 12 µg/m3, or the National 24-hour average exceedence concentration of 35 µg/m3, then the buildings need to have a mechanical supply of outdoor air that has air filtration with sufficient removal efficiency, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles is less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. It is my experience that based on the projected high traffic noise levels, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 will exceed the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards and warrant installation of high efficiency air filters (i.e. MERV 13 or higher) in all mechanically supplied outdoor air ventilation systems. Indoor Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures The following are recommended mitigation measures to minimize the impacts upon indoor quality: Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Mitigation. Use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins (CARB, 2009). CARB Phase 2 certified composite wood products, or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins, do not insure indoor formaldehyde concentrations that are below the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Only composite wood products manufactured with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins, such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. Alternatively, conduct the previously described Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Chemical Emissions Assessment, to determine that the combination of formaldehyde emissions from building materials and furnishings do not create indoor formaldehyde concentrations that exceed the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. It is important to note that we are not asking that the builder"speculate" on what and how 12 of 19 much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health "Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers", (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described above (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Mitigation. Provide each habitable room with a continuous mechanical supply of outdoor air that meets or exceeds the California 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (California Energy Commission, 2015) requirements of the greater of 15 cfm/occupant or 0.15 cfm/ft2 of floor area. Following installation of the system conduct testing and balancing to insure that required amount of outdoor air is entering each habitable room and provide a written report documenting the outdoor airflow rates. Do not use exhaust only mechanical outdoor air systems, use only balanced outdoor air supply and exhaust systems or outdoor air supply only systems. Provide a manual for the occupants or maintenance personnel, that describes the purpose of the mechanical outdoor air system and the operation and maintenance requirements of the system. PM2_5 Outdoor Air Concentration Mitigation. Install air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency (e.g. MERV 13 or higher) to filter the outdoor air entering the mechanical outdoor air supply systems, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles are less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. Install the air filters in the system such that they are accessible for replacement by the occupants or maintenance personnel. Include in the mechanical outdoor air ventilation system manual instructions on how to replace the air filters and the estimated frequency of replacement. 13 of 19 References AECOM. 2021. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project. BIFA. 2018. BIFMA Product Safety and Performance Standards and Guidelines. www.bifma.org/page/standardsoverview California Air Resources Board. 2009. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Reduce Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/fro-final.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm California Building Code. 2001. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2 Volume 1, Appendix Chapter 12, Interior Environment, Division 1, Ventilation, Section 1207: 2001 California Building Code, California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento, CA. California Building Standards Commission (2014). 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx. California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2007-033. Final Report, ARB Contract 03-326. Available at: www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/03-326.pdf. California Energy Commission, 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6. 14 of 19 http://www.energy.ca.gov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037- CMF.pdf CDPH. 2017. Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1. California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx. EPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, Chapter 16 — Activity Factors. Report EPA/600/R-09/052F, September 2011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Hodgson, A. T., D. Beal, J.E.R. Mcllvaine. 2002. Sources of formaldehyde, other aldehydes and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 12: 235-242. OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2017a. Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels. No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. Available at: http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/safeharbor081513.pdf OEHHA - Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2017b. All OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html Offermann, F. J. 2009. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes. California Air Resources Board and California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program. Collaborative Report. CEC-500-2009-085. https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/04-310.pdf 15 of 19 Offermann, F. J. and A. T. Hodgson. 2011. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes. Proceedings Indoor Air 2011 (12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011), June 5-10, 2011, Austin, TX. Singer, B.C, Chan, W.R, Kim, Y., Offermann, F.J., and Walker I.S. 2020. Indoor Air Quality in California Homes with Code-Required Mechanical Ventilation. Indoor Air, Vol 30, Issue 5, 885-899. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2015. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Handbook. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air- quality-analysis-handbook USGBC. 2014. LEED BD+C Homes v4. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C. http://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4 16 of 19 APPENDIX A INDOOR FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS AND THE CARB FORMALDEHYDE ATCM With respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, the CARB ATCM regulations of formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, do not assure healthful indoor air quality. The following is the stated purpose of the CARB ATCM regulation - The purpose of this airborne toxic control measure is to "reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, and finished goods that contain composite wood products, that are sold, offered for sale, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California". In other words,the CARB ATCM regulations do not "assure healthful indoor air quality", but rather "reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products". Just how much protection do the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products? Definitely some, but certainly the regulations do not "assure healthful indoor air quality" when CARB Phase 2 products are utilized. As shown in the Chan 2019 study of new California homes, the median indoor formaldehyde concentration was of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb), which corresponds to a cancer risk of 112 per million for occupants with continuous exposure,which is more than 11 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Another way of looking at how much protection the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products is to calculate the maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. For this calculation I utilized the floor area (2,272 ft2), the ceiling height (8.5 ft), and the number of bedrooms (4) as defined in Appendix B (New Single-Family Residence Scenario) of the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1, 2017, California 17 of 19 Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx. For the outdoor air ventilation rate I used the 2019 Title 24 code required mechanical ventilation rate (ASHRAE 62.2) of 106 cfm (180 m3/h) calculated for this model residence. For the composite wood formaldehyde emission rates I used the CARB ATCM Phase 2 rates. The calculated maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence, without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard(MDF)— 15 ft2 (0.7% of the floor area), or Particle Board—30 ft2 (1.3% of the floor area), or Hardwood Plywood—54 ft2 (2.4% of the floor area), or Thin MDF—46 ft2 (2.0 % of the floor area). For offices and hotels the calculated maximum amount of composite wood product (% of floor area) that can be used without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants, assuming 8 hours/day occupancy, and the California Mechanical Code minimum outdoor air ventilation rates are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard(MDF)—3.6 % (offices) and 4.6% (hotel rooms), or Particle Board—7.2 % (offices) and 9.4% (hotel rooms), or Hardwood Plywood— 13 % (offices) and 17% (hotel rooms), or Thin MDF— 11 % (offices) and 14 % (hotel rooms) Clearly the CARB ATCM does not regulate the formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products such that the potentially large areas of these products, such as for flooring, baseboards, interior doors, window and door trims, and kitchen and bathroom cabinetry, 18 of 19 could be used without causing indoor formaldehyde concentrations that result in CEQA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. Even composite wood products manufactured with CARB certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million. The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met. If CARB Phase 2 compliant or ULEF composite wood products are utilized in construction,then the resulting indoor formaldehyde concentrations should be determined in the design phase using the specific amounts of each type of composite wood product, the specific formaldehyde emission rates, and the volume and outdoor air ventilation rates of the indoor spaces, and all feasible mitigation measures employed to reduce this impact (e.g. use less formaldehyde containing composite wood products and/or incorporate mechanical systems capable of higher outdoor air ventilation rates). See the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Alternatively, and perhaps a simpler approach, is to use only composite wood products (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF)resins. 19 of 19 Exhibit B Shawn Smallwood, PhD 3108 Finch Street Davis, CA 95616 Vincent Acuna, Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 26 September 2021 RE: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Dear Mr.Acuna, I write to comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the proposed Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021), specifically on its analysis of potential impacts to biological resources. I understand the project would consist of a 26o-unit apartment community composed of two 6o-foot-tall buildings and 3,339 square feet of commercial floorspace on 5.2 acres at 12901-12939 Foothill Boulevard. The IS/MND is deficient in its characterization of the environmental setting and by not analyzing impacts to special-status species caused by habitat loss, interference with movement in the region,bird-window collisions, wildlife- automobile collisions, and it is deficient in its mitigation plan. My qualifications for preparing expert comments are the following. I hold a Ph.D. degree in Ecology from University of California at Davis,where I also worked for four years as a post-graduate researcher in the Department of Agronomy and Range Sciences. My research has been on animal density and distribution, habitat selection, interactions between wildlife and human infrastructure and activities, conservation of rare and endangered species, and on the ecology of invading species. I study wildlife mortality caused by wind turbines, electric distribution lines, agricultural practices, and road traffic. I authored numerous papers on special-status species issues. I served as Chair of the Conservation Affairs Committee for The Wildlife Society—Western Section. I am a member of The Wildlife Society and the Raptor Research Foundation. I was a part-time lecturer at California State University, Sacramento. I was Associate Editor of wildlife biology's premier scientific journal, The Journal of Wildlife Management, as well as of Biological Conservation, and I was on the Editorial Board of Environmental Management. I have performed wildlife surveys in California for thirty-six years, including at many proposed project sites. My CV is attached. SITE VISIT Noriko Smallwood, a wildlife biologist with a Master's Degree from California State University Los Angeles,visited the site of the proposed project on my behalf for nearly 2 hours from 06:54 to 08:42 hours on 4 September 2021 (Photo 1). She walked the site's perimeter, stopping to scan for wildlife with the use of binoculars. The sky was clear with no wind, and temperatures ranged 64-72° F. 1 Noriko Smallwood certifies that the foregoing and following survey results are true and accurately reported. Noriko Smallwood s =_ Photos 1. Site of proposed Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project. Photo by Noriko Smallwood, 4 September 2021. Ms. Smallwood detected 24 species of vertebrate wildlife during her 108 minutes at the site (Table 1). She saw Cooper's hawk and American kestrel (Photos 2 and 3), California scrub jays and American crows (Photos 4 and 5), Say's phoebe and a great blue heron (Photos 6 and 7), and side-blotched lizard and California ground squirrel (Photos 8 and 9), among other species. Noriko's detections of 24 species of vertebrate wildlife need to be interpreted within the context of her survey effort. No matter who performs the survey, the results of a single survey qualify as a thin empirical foundation for characterizing the environmental setting of any given site, including one proposed for a project. A single survey can serve only as a starting point toward characterization of a site's wildlife community. Noriko had only <2 hours available to perform a visual scan survey on 4 September 2021, so there were only so many species she was likely to detect. Noriko could have detected many more species than she did had she also performed surveys at different times of day to detect diurnal, nocturnal and crepuscular species, or surveys in different seasons and years to detect migrants and species with multi-annual cycles of abundance, or surveys of different methods such as se of acoustic detectors or thermal-imaging for bats, owls, and nocturnally migratory birds, and live-trapping for small mammals. Noriko survey outcome indicates that the site of the proposed project continues to serve as valuable habitat to at least 24 species of vertebrate wildlife, and it likely serves as habitat to many more species. It also holds the potential to produce many new birds, mammals and reptiles for years to come. A fair argument can be made for the need to more rigorously survey the site for wildlife, and for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze potential project impacts to wildlife. 2 Table 1. Species of wildlife Noriko Smallwood observed from 06:54 to 08:42 hours on 4 September 2021 at the proposed Project site. Species Scientific name Status Great blue heron Ardea herodius Gull Laridae Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooperii WL, BOP American kestrel Falco sparverius BOP Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Eurasian collared-dove Streptopelia decaocto Non-native Anna's hummingbird Calypte anna White-throated swift Aeronautes saxatalis Say's phoebe Sayornis saya Black phoebe Sayornis nigricans Cassin's kingbird Tyrannus vociferans European starling Sturnus vulgaris Non-native California scrub-jay Aphelocoma californica Common raven Corvus corax American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor Barn swallow Hirundo rustica Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos Bushtit Psaltiparus minimus _ House sparrow Passer domesticus Non-native House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Lesser goldfinch Carduelis psaltria California ground squirrel Otospermophilus beecheyi Side-blotched lizard Uta stansburiana Photos 2 and 3. Cooper's hawk (left) and American kestrel(right) at the site of the proposed project, 4 September 2021. Photos by Noriko Smallwood. 3 , ifilr Photo 4 and 5. California scrub jay (left) and American crow (right) at the project site, 4 September 2021. Photos by Noriko Smallwood. IP y • Photos 6 and 7. Says phoebe (left) and great blue heron (right) at the project site. Photos by Noriko Smallwood, 4 September 2021. 4 i`i'_ w y+ . ` A •• � i .�g` •fr • � J. :y AP , 4 } i ' �.• Photos 8 and 9. Side-blotched T,, lizard at the project site and a = ---,.,. t. ground squirrel across the street, 4 . �:'• September 2021. Photos by Noriko -1a. -' Smallwood. , . - i' 1 I , Ms. Smallwood's detection of California ground squirrels on the open field across the street indicates that ground squirrels likely also occur on the project site. The occurrence of ground squirrels in the project area is significant because many special- status species are found in association with ground squirrels and their burrow complexes. Ground squirrels are prey of large raptors such as bald eagle, golden eagle, ferruginous hawk and Swainson's hawk. Ground squirrels are also prey of terrestrial carnivores such as American badger, which specialize on ground squirrels. Ground squirrels also construct subterranean habitat used by many species such as burrowing owl. The occurrence of ground squirrel warrants detection surveys for multiple special- status species that associate with this species. BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT The IS/MND refers to a reconnaissance field survey Performed by AECOM (2021) on 24 September 2020. A botanist visited the site for 90 minutes in the middle of the afternoon (14:00 to 15:30 hours) when wildlife were least likely to be detected. In fact, temperatures were reportedly 96° to 99° F, which was just too hot for a wildlife survey. The IS/MND (page 4-14) reports, "no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed within the biological survey area during the reconnaissance field survey,"but this report follows from a survey of insufficient effort at the most inappropriate time of day. Given the minimal effort at the worst time of day, there should be no surprise that special-status species were undetected. I further note that nothing is reported of AECOM's (2021) wildlife survey; that is, the IS/MND fails to report which, if any, species of wildlife were detected by the botanist who was sent to do the job. This lack of reporting suggests to me that the botanist likely saw no wildlife in the heat of the middle of the afternoon. 5 The IS/MND misuses the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). According to the IS/MND, "the CNDDB records of these four species had non-specific locations which were not mapped precisely to the locations where the species were observed and each individual observation is a square mile or greater in size; so it is not known whether the observation was actually made precisely within the biological survey area." In fact, CNDDB records are mapped accurately,but exact locations are often not shared publicly as a means to protect the species. CNDDB records are intended to indicate the likelihood of occurrence of a special-status species in the project area,but not the species' exact locations. Nor is CNDDB intended to support determinations of species' absence, as the IS/MND implies. CNDDB is intended to flag the occurrences of species in the area, not to provide an exact accounting of where the species is located at the moment. The IS/MND further misrepresents CNDDB by implying that older records are dismissible. According to the IS/MND, "...CNDDB records that overlap with the biological survey area are 19 years old or more and since that time, the area has been developed substantially.As a result, it is possible many locations no longer exist. Current site conditions do not provide suitable habitat for these species and none are known to occur or expected to occur within the Project site or vicinity." CNDDB does not imply that species are static, or that locations where they were mapped previously are the only locations where the species would be found later. Wildlife populations are spatially dynamic, shifting centers of activity every generation or so (Taylor and Taylor 1979), so it would be inappropriate of CNDDB to assert that locations of past occupancy should still be locations of current occupancy. For this reason, users of CNDDB typically determine whether CNDDB records exist within a 5-mile radius of a proposed project. Occurrences within 5 miles serve as indicators that the species could also occur at the project site, and if so, then protocol-level detection surveys should be performed. The IS/MND asserts, "the BSA generally does not provide suitable habitat for special- status wildlife species."This assertion,however, lacks evidence in the form of detection survey results. Detection surveys are designed by species' experts to—at reasonable cost —provide the best chance for detecting the targeted species by applying the methods and survey effort most likely to detect the species if it is indeed present. The objectives of detection surveys are to (1) support negative findings of species when appropriate, (2) inform preconstruction surveys to improve their efficacy, (3) estimate project impacts, and(4) inform compensatory mitigation and other forms of mitigation. The botanist who surveyed the project site for 90 minutes in the middle of the hot afternoon did not come anywhere close to having performed a detection survey for any species of wildlife. Neither AECOM nor City of Rancho Cucamonga was justified by asserting that the site lacks special-status species of wildlife. Detection surveys for multiple special-status species of wildlife should be implemented to inform an EIR. Without such surveys, the IS/MND only speculates that habitat is marginal and occurrence likelihoods low. The IS/MND repeatedly speculates that for this or that species, anthropogenic disturbances prevent their occurrences. The IS/MND exemplifies one such disturbance as routine mowing of the site. The IS/MND 6 offers no evidence in defense of its premise that routine mowing precludes special- status species of wildlife. It fails to identify the Crotch bumble bee host plants that allegedly occur in low density, and it fails to make the case that the host plants in question are the only plants useable by Crotch bumble bee. The IS/MND relies on generalities rather than specifics, and on speculation rather than evidence. It suggests that house cats killed off the special-status species, and that traffic noise drove them away, and that insect prey are in low supply. None of these suggestions are backed by evidence, and no effort has been made to actually look for special-status species on the site. An example follows. In the case of the Crotch bumble bee,the IS/MND reports, "No bumble bee species were observed during the field survey." (There is only one species of Crotch bumble bee.) This reporting ignores the fact that Crotch bumble bees are unlikely to be out and about in the middle of the afternoon when temperatures range 96°to 99° F, as was reportedly the conditions during the one survey performed — a survey performed not by a wildlife ecologist or an entomologist,but by a botanist. The report of having not detected Crotch bumble bee was a meaningless report, and serves only to misrepresent how wildlife ecologists determine whether a species is present or likely absent from a site. My review of eBird and iNaturalist identified 6o special-status species of vertebrate wildlife and the Crotch's bumble bee as having been seen very close to the project site, seen nearby, seen within the region, or whose geographic range overlaps the project site (Table 2). I consider all of these species in Table 2 as potentially occurring on the project site at one time or another or periodically. AECOM (2o2i) determines occurrence likelihood to be low for western yellow bat and Crotch bumble bee,but its determinations for all other species is unreported. AECOM (2o2i) refers the reader to Appendix D for determinations of all species considered,but Appendix D is empty on the copy of AECOM's report I downloaded from City of Rancho Cucamonga's web site. Habitat Loss The IS/MND identifies only mourning dove as a bird species likely to nest on the ground. It lists only house finch, northern mockingbird and California scrub-jay as species likely to nest trees in the area. In reality, many more species of birds are capable of nesting on and around the project site. Many bird species are ground-nesters. The IS/MND does not analyze the impact of habitat loss, or the loss of productive capacity. A recent study documented a 29% decline in overall bird abundance across North America over the last 48 years — a decline driven by multiple factors,but principally attributed to habitat loss and habitat fragmentation (Rosenberg et al. 2019). Habitat loss not only results in the immediate numerical decline of wildlife,but it also results in permanent loss of productive capacity. For example, a grassland/wetland/woodland complex at one study site had a total bird nesting density of 32.8 nests per acre (Young 1948). In another study on a similar complex of vegetation cover,the average annual nest density was 35.8 nests per acre (Yahner 1982). These densities averaged 34.3 nests per acre, indicative of a very large productive capacity of North American birds,but also indicative of a very large source of lost capacity should habitat be taken for human uses. Table 2. Occurrence likelihoods of special-status species of vertebrate wildlife as determined by the IS/MND and by publicly available data bases such as eBird(https://eBird.org) and iNaturalist, where 'very close'indicates within a mile, `nearby'indicates within a few miles, and 'in region'indicates within to to 3o miles of the project site. Occurrence likelihood _ Common name Species name Statusl IS/MND Data bases Double-crested cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus WL Nearby California gull Larus californicus WL Very close Turkey vulture Cathartes aura BOP Very close Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGEPA, BCC, CFP Nearby Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos BGEPA, BCC, CFP Nearby Swainson's hawk Buteo swainsoni CT, BOP Nearby Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis BOP Very close Ferruginous hawk Buteo regalis WL, BOP Nearby Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus BOP Nearby Northern harrier Circus cyaneus SSC3, BOP Nearby White-tailed kite Elanus leucurus CFP, BOP Nearly Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus WL, BOP Very close Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooperi WL, BOP Nearby American kestrel Falco sparverius BOP Very close Merlin Falco columbarius WL, BOP Very close Prairie falcon Falco mexicanus WL, BOP Nearby Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus CE, CFP, BOP Nearby Barn owl Tyto alba BOP Nearby Burrowing owl Bubo virginianus BCC, SSC2, BOP Nearby Great-horned owl Athene cunicularia SSC2, BOP Nearby Western screech-owl Megascops kennicottii BOP In region Vaux's swift Chaetura vauxi SSC2 Nearby Lewis's woodpecker Melanerpes lewis BCC In region Nuttall's woodpecker Picoides nuttallii BCC Nearby Costa's hummingbird Calypte costae BCC Nearby Allen's hummingbird Selasphorus sasin BCC Very close Rufous hummingbird Selasphorus rufus BCC Nearby 8 Occurrence likelihood Common name Species name Statusl IS/MND Data bases _ Cactus wren Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus BCC In region Horned lark Eremophila alpestris actia WL Nearby California gnatcatcher Polioptila c. californica FT, SSC In region Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii CE, BCC Nearby Olive-sided flycatcher Contopus cooperi SSC2 Nearby Vermilion flycatcher Pyrocephalus rubinus SSC2 Nearby Purple martin Progne subis SSC2 In region Oak titmouse Baeolophus inornatus BCC _ Nearby Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus BCC, SSC2 Very close Least Bell's vireo Vireo belli pusillus FE, CE In region Yellow warbler Setophaga petechia SSC2 Nearby Summer tanager Piranga rubra SSCi In region Black-chinned sparrow Spizella atrogularis BCC In region Bell's sage sparrow Amphispiza b. belli WL In region Oregon vesper sparrow Pooecetes gramineus affinis SSC2 Nearby Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum SSC2 In region Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow Aimophila ruficeps canescens BCC, WL In region Tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor SSCi In region Yellow-headed blackbird Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus SSC3 In region Lawrence's goldfinch Spinus lawrencei BCC Nearby Blainville's horned lizard Phrynosoma blainvillii SSC Nearby Pallid bat Antrozous pallidus SSC,WBWG H In range Townsend's western big-eared bat Plecotus t. townsendii SSC,WBWG H In region Western red bat Lasiurus blossevillii SSC,WBWG H In region Western yellow bat Lasiurus xanthinus SSC,WBWG H Low In range Small-footed myotis Myotis cililabrum WBWG M In range Miller's myotis Myotis evotis WBWG M In region Fringed myotis Myotis thysanodes WBWG H In region Long-legged myotis Myotis Volans WBWG H In range Yuma myotis Myotis yumanensis SSC,WBWG LM In region 9 Occurrence likelihood Common name Species name Statusl IS/MND , Data bases _ Western mastiff bat Eumops perotis SSC In region Hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus WBWG LM In region American badger Taxidea taxus SSC In region Crotch bumble bee Bombus crotchii CE Low Nearby _ 1 Listed as FT and FE = federal threatened and endangered, BCC = U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bird of Conservation Concern, CT and CE = California threatened and endangered, CFP = California Fully Protected (CDFW Code 3511), BOP = California Fish and Game Code 3503.5 (Birds of prey), and SSCi, SSC2 and SSC3 = California Bird Species of Special Concern priorities 1, 2 and 3, respectively(Shuford and Gardali 2008),WL = Taxa to Watch List (Shuford and Gardali 2008), and WBWG = Western Bat Working Group listing as moderate or high priority. 10 Assuming nesting density at the project site is a fifth of the average reported by Young (1948) and Yahner (1982),then 6.8 bird nests per acre multiplied against the project's 5.2 acres would predict that 35 bird nests produce new birds at the site annually. The average number of fledglings per nest in Young's (1948) study was 2.9. Assuming Young's (1948) study site typifies bird productivity,the project would prevent the production of 102 fledglings per year. After 100 years and further assuming an average bird generation time of 5 years,the lost capacity of both breeders and annual fledgling production would total 11,600 birds {(nests/year x chicks/nest x number of years) + (2 adults/nest x nests/year) x (number of years + years/generation)}. The project's denial to California of 11,60o birds over the first century following construction would easily qualify as a significant and substantial impact. This impact has not been addressed by City of Cucamonga. If the City believes my assumed nesting density is inaccurate, then I suggest inserting another density value that is better founded,but I also predict that the productive capacity estimate would be little different from my own. The impact of habitat loss would be significant. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to appropriately analyze the project's impacts from habitat loss. Habitat fragmentation,which is the reduction of connectivity of remaining habitat patches on a landscape, can further diminish the productive capacity of a site (Smallwood 2015). Habitat fragmentation has progressed rapidly around the project site,leaving a diminishing number of patches of open space in the area, each of which is increasingly critical to the continued existence of many wildlife species. Habitat fragmentation is one of the cumulative effects of this project that needs to be analyzed in an EIR. Wildlife Movement The IS/MND dismisses potential impacts to wildlife movement by concluding that development around the project site precludes its use as part of a wildlife movement corridor. The premise of this conclusion must be that the presence of a wildlife corridor determines whether a project would significantly interfere with wildlife movement in the region. However, this premise represents a false CEQA standard. The primary phrase of the CEQA standard goes to wildlife movement regardless of whether the movement is channeled by a corridor. A site such as the proposed project site is critically important for wildlife movement because it composes one of the last of a diminishing suite of open space patches within a growing expanse of anthropogenic uses, forcing more species of birds to use the site for stopover and staging during migration, dispersal, and home range patrol (Warnock 2010, Taylor et al. 2011, Runge et al. 2014). The project would cut birds and bats off from stopover, roosting and staging opportunities, forcing them to travel even farther between remaining stopover areas along migration routes. The project would interfere with wildlife movement in the region. An EIR needs to be prepared to address the project's impacts on wildlife movement in the region. 11 BIRD-WINDOW COLLISION MORTALITY At 6o feet tall,the project's buildings would extend into much of the bird traffic Ms. Smallwood observed at the project site. The IS/MND's rendering of the project shows facades composed of extensive structural glass, which has been the recent trend.l The project would introduce substantial collision hazards to an aerosphere that currently provides critically important habitat to birds, and which would act as lethal traps to flying birds. Window collisions are often characterized as either the second or third largest source or human-caused bird mortality. The numbers behind these characterizations are often attributed to Klem's (1990) and Dunn's (1993) estimates of about 10o million to 1 billion bird fatalities in the USA, or more recently Loss et al.'s (2014) estimate of 365-988 million bird fatalities in the USA or Calvert et al.'s (2013) and Machtans et al.'s (2013) estimates of 22.4 million and 25 million bird fatalities in Canada, respectively. However, these estimates were likely biased too low, because they were based on opportunistic sampling,volunteer study participation, fatality monitoring by more inexperienced than experienced searchers, and usually no adjustments made for scavenger removals of carcasses before searchers could detect them (Bracey et al. 2016). Hundreds of thousands of birds migrate along the Pacific Flyway. Noriko Smallwood's observations during her visit to the site confirmed that birds fly through the airspace of the project, even during the nonmigratory season. At least 47 special-status species of bird are known to the project area (Table 2). According to the scientific literature, most of the special-status species in Table 2 have been documented as window collision fatalities and are therefore susceptible to new structural glass installations (Supplemental Material to Basilio et al. 2020; Smallwood unpublished review). Many more species of migratory birds, newly protected by California's revised Fish and Game Code section 3513, have also been documented as window collision victims (Basilio et al. 2020). Nowhere in the IS/MND is there any concern expressed for bird-window collision impacts, nor is there any mitigation proposed to avoid, minimize or compensate for such impacts. As I will show in the next section, many birds can be expected to be killed by windows of the proposed project. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to adequately address this potential impact. 1 Recent advances in structural glass engineering have contributed to a proliferation of glass windows on building facades. This proliferation is readily observable in newer buildings and in recent project planning documents, and it is represented by a worldwide 20%increase in glass manufacturing for building construction since 2016. Glass markets in the USA experienced 5% growth in both 2011 and 2016, and was forecast to grow 2.3%per year since 2016 (TMCapital 2o19). Increasing window to wall ratios and glass facades have become popular for multiple reasons, including a growing demand for`daylighting.' 12 Project Impact Prediction Predicting the impacts caused by loss of aerial habitat and the energetic costs of birds having to navigate around the buildings is possible, but I am unprepared to make such predictions. However, I am prepared to predict bird-window collision mortality. By the time of these comments I had reviewed and processed results of bird collision monitoring at 213 buildings and facades for which bird collisions per m2 of glass per year could be calculated and averaged (Johnson and Hudson 1976, O'Connell 2001, Somerlot 2003, Hager et al. 2008, Borden et al. 2010, Hager et al. 2013, Porter and Huang 2015, Parkins et al. 2015, Kahle et al. 2016, Ocampo-Pefluela et al. 2016, Sabo et al. 2016, Barton et al. 2017, Gomez-Moreno et al. 2018, Schneider et al. 2018, Loss et al. 2019, Brown et al. 2020, , City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland Audubon 2020, Riding et al. 2020). These study results averaged 0.073 bird deaths per m2 of glass per year (95% CI: 0.042-0.102). Based on a renderin of a building in the IS/MND, I estimated the proposed project would include at least 3,196 m2 of glass on its facades. This extent of glass applied to the mean fatality rate would predict at least 234 bird deaths per year (95% CI: 139-329). The 1oo-year toll from this average annual fatality rate would be at least 23,363 bird deaths (95% CI: 13,871-32,855). These estimates would be perhaps 3 times higher after accounting for the proportions of fatalities removed by scavengers or missed by fatality searchers where studies have been performed. Collision fatalities would continue until the buildings are either renovated to reduce bird collisions or they come down. If the project moves forward as proposed, and annually kills 234 birds protected by state and federal laws, then the project would cause significant unmitigated impacts. Bird-Window Collision Factors Below is a list of collision factors I found in the scientific literature, and which I suggest ought to be used to draft Bird-Safe Guidelines for City of Rancho Cucamonga and which ought to be used to formulate a bird-safe plan for the proposed project. Following this list are specific notes and findings taken from the literature and my own experience. (1) Inherent hazard of a structure in the airspace used for nocturnal migration or other flights (2) Window transparency, falsely revealing passage through structure or to indoor plants (3) Window reflectance, falsely depicting vegetation, competitors, or open airspace (4) Black hole or passage effect (5) Window or facade extent, or proportion of facade consisting of window or other reflective surface (6) Size of window (7) Type of glass (8) Lighting,which is correlated with window extent and building operations (9) Height of structure (collision mechanisms shift with height above ground) (10) Orientation of facade with respect to winds and solar exposure (ii) Structural layout causing confusion and entrapment 13 (12) Context in terms of urban-rural gradient, or surrounding extent of impervious surface vs vegetation (13) Height, structure, and extent of vegetation grown near home or building (14) Presence of birdfeeders or other attractants (15) Relative abundance (16) Season of the year (17) Ecology, demography and behavior (18) Predatory attacks or cues provoking fear of attack (19) Aggressive social interactions (1) Inherent hazard of structure in airspace.—Not all of a structure's collision risk can be attributed to windows. Overing (1938) reported 576 birds collided with the Washington Monument in 90 minutes on one night, 12 September 1937. The average annual fatality count had been 328 birds from 1932 through 1936. Gelb and Delacretaz (2009) and Klem et al. (2009) also reported finding collision victims at buildings lacking windows, although many fewer than they found at buildings fitted with widows. The takeaway is that any building going up at the project site would likely kill birds, although mortality would increase with larger expanses of glass. (2)Window transparency.—Widely believed as one of the two principal factors contributing to avian collisions with buildings is the transparency of glass used in windows on the buildings (Klem 1989). Gelb and Delacretaz (2009) felt that many of the collisions they detected occurred where transparent windows revealed interior vegetation. (3) Window reflectance.—Widely believed as one of the two principal factors contributing to avian collisions with buildings is the reflectance of glass used in windows on the buildings (Klem 1989). Reflectance can deceptively depict open airspace, vegetation as habitat destination, or competitive rivals as self-images (Klem 1989). Gelb and Delacretaz (2009) felt that many of the collisions they detected occurred toward the lower parts of buildings where large glass exteriors reflected outdoor vegetation. Klem et al. (2009) and Borden et al. (2010) also found that reflected outdoor vegetation associated positively with collisions. (4) Black hole or passage effect.—Although this factor was not often mentioned in the bird-window collision literature, it was suggested in Sheppard and Phillips (2015). The black hole or passage effect is the deceptive appearance of a cavity or darkened ledge that certain species of bird typically approach with speed when seeking roosting sites. The deception is achieved when shadows from awnings or the interior light conditions give the appearance of cavities or protected ledges. This factor appears potentially to be nuanced variations on transparency or reflectance or possibly an interaction effect of both of these factors. It might play a significant role in the proposed project, which includes extruded window frames of many windows. (5) Window or facade extent.—Klem et al. (2009), Borden et al. (2010), Hager et al. (2013), Ocampo-Penuela et al. (2016), Loss et al. (2019), Rebolo-Ifran et al. (2019), and Riding et al. (2020) reported increased collision fatalities at buildings with larger 14 reflective façades or higher proportions of facades composed of windows. However, Porter and Huang (2015) found a negative relationship between fatalities found and proportion of façade that was glazed. (6) Size of window.—According to Kahle et al. (2016), collision rates were higher on large-pane windows compared to small-pane windows. (7) Type of glass.—Klem et al. (2009) found that collision fatalities associated with the type of glass used on buildings. Otherwise, little attention has been directed towards the types of glass in buildings. (8) Lighting.—Parkins et al. (2015) found that light emission from buildings correlated positively with percent glass on the façade, suggesting that lighting is linked to the extent of windows. Zink and Eckles (2010) reported fatality reductions, including an 8o% reduction at a Chicago high-rise, upon the initiation of the Lights-out Program. However, Zink and Eckles (2010) provided no information on their search effort, such as the number of searches or search interval or search area around each building. (9) Height of structure.—Except for Riding et al. (2020), I found little if any hypothesis- testing related to building height, including whether another suite of factors might relate to collision victims of high-rises. Are migrants more commonly the victims of high-rises or of smaller buildings? Some of the most notorious buildings are low-rise buildings. (1o) Orientation of façade.—Some studies tested façade orientation, but not convincingly. Some evidence that orientation affects collision rates was provided by Winton et al. (2018). Confounding factors such as the extent and types of windows would require large sample sizes of collision victims to parse out the variation so that some portion of it could be attributed to orientation of façade. Whether certain orientations cause disproportionately stronger or more realistic-appearing reflections ought to be testable through measurement, but counting dead birds under façades of different orientations would help. (11) Structural layout.—Bird-safe building guidelines have illustrated examples of structural layouts associated with high rates of bird-window collisions,but little attention has been directed towards hazardous structural layouts in the scientific literature. An exception was Johnson and Hudson (1976), who found high collision rates at 3 stories of glassed-in walkways atop an open breezeway, located on a break in slope with trees on one side of the structure and open sky on the other, Washington State University. (12) Context in urban-rural gradient.—Numbers of fatalities found in monitoring have associated negatively with increasing developed area surrounding the building (Hager et al. 2013), and positively with more rural settings (Kummer et al. 2016). (13) Height, structure and extent of vegetation near building.—Correlations have sometimes been found between collision rates and the presence or extent of vegetation near windows (Hager et al. 2008, Borden et al. 2010, Kummer et al. 2016, Ocampo- 15 Penuela et al. 2016). However, Porter and Huang (2015) found a negative relationship between fatalities found and vegetation cover near the building. In my experience,what probably matters most is the distance from the building that vegetation occurs. If the vegetation that is used by birds is very close to a glass facade, then birds coming from that glass will be less likely to attain sufficient speed upon arrival at the facade to result in a fatal injury. Too far away and there is probably no relationship. But 30 to 50 m away, and birds alighting from vegetation can attain lethal speeds by the time they arrive at the windows. (14) Presence of birdfeeders.—Dunn (1993) reported a weak correlation (r = 0.13, P < 0.001)between number of birds killed by home windows and the number of birds counted at feeders. However, Kummer and Bayne (2015) found that experimental installment of birdfeeders at homes increased bird collisions with windows 1.84-fold. (15) Relative abundance.—Collision rates have often been assumed to increase with local density or relative abundance (Klem 1989), and positive correlations have been measured (Dunn 1993, Hager et al. 2008). However, Hager and Craig (2014) found a negative correlation between fatality rates and relative abundance near buildings. (16) Season of the year.—Borden et al. (2010) found 9o% of collision fatalities during spring and fall migration periods. The significance of this finding is magnified by 7-day carcass persistence rates of 0.45 and 0.35 in spring and fall, rates which were considerably lower than during winter and summer (Hager et al. 2012). In other words, the concentration of fatalities during migration seasons would increase after applying seasonally-explicit adjustments for carcass persistence. Fatalities caused by collisions into the glass facades of the project's building would likely be concentrated in fall and spring migration periods. (17) Ecology, demography and behavior.—Klem (1989) noted that certain types of birds were not found as common window-caused fatalities, including soaring hawks and waterbirds. Cusa et al. (2015) found that species colliding with buildings surrounded by higher levels of urban greenery were foliage gleaners, and species colliding with buildings surrounded by higher levels of urbanization were ground foragers. Sabo et al. (2016) found no difference in age class, but did find that migrants are more susceptible to collision than resident birds. (18) Predatory attacks.—Panic flights caused by raptors were mentioned in 16% of window strike reports in Dunn's (1993) study. I have witnessed Cooper's hawks chasing birds into windows, including house finches next door to my home and a northern mocking bird chased directly into my office window. Predatory birds likely to collide with the project's windows would include Peregrine falcon, red-shouldered hawk, Cooper's hawk, and sharp-shinned hawk. (19)Aggressive social interactions.—I found no hypothesis-testing of the roles of aggressive social interactions in the literature other than the occasional anecdotal account of birds attacking their self-images reflected from windows. However, I have 16 witnessed birds chasing each other and sometimes these chases resulting in one of the birds hitting a window. For most of the known or suspected collision risk factors, the proposed project's design remains insufficiently described to determine the degree to which the project would contribute to relative collision risk. Focused study of birds in the area could reduce the uncertainty of potential project impacts. Such studies could make use of radar (Gauthreaux et al. 2008) or visual scan surveys (Smallwood 2017). Key information useful for impacts assessment and mitigation would include intensity and timing of bird traffic, heights above ground, travel trajectories, and specific behaviors of birds in flight. Window Collision Solutions Given the magnitude of bird-window collision impacts, there are obviously great opportunities for reducing and minimizing these impacts going forward. Existing structures can be modified or retrofitted to reduce impacts, and proposed new structures can be more carefully sited, designed, and managed to minimize impacts. However, the costs of some of these measures can be high and can vary greatly, but most importantly the efficacies of many of these measures remain uncertain. Both the costs and effectiveness of all of these measures can be better understood through experimentation and careful scientific investigation. Post-construction fatality monitoring should be an essential feature of any new building project. Below is a listing of mitigation options, along with some notes and findings from the literature. Any new project should be informed by preconstruction surveys of daytime and nocturnal flight activity. Such surveys can reveal the one or more facades facing the prevailing approach direction of birds, and these revelations can help prioritize where certain types of mitigation can be targeted. It is critical to formulate effective measures prior to construction, because post-construction options will be limited, likely more expensive, and probably less effective. (1)Retrofitting to reduce impacts (iA) Marking windows (1B) Managing outdoor landscape vegetation (iC) Managing indoor landscape vegetation (iD) Managing nocturnal lighting (iA) Marking windows.— Whereas Klem (1990) found no deterrent effect from decals on windows, Johnson and Hudson (1976) reported a fatality reduction of about 69% after placing decals on windows. In an experiment of opportunity, Ocampo-Penuela et al. (2016) found only 2 of 86 fatalities at one of 6 buildings —the only building with windows treated with a bird deterrent film.At the building with fritted glass,bird collisions were 82% lower than at other buildings with untreated windows. Kahle et al. (2016) added external window shades to some windowed facades to reduce fatalities 82% and 95%. Brown et al. (2020) reported an 84% lower collision probability among fritted glass windows and windows treated with ORNILUX R UV. City of Portland 17 Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland Audubon (2020) reduced bird collision fatalities 94%by affixing marked Solyx window film to existing glass panels of Portland's Columbia Building. Many external and internal glass markers have been tested experimentally, some showing no effect and some showing strong deterrent effects (Klem 1989, 1990, 2009, 2011; Klem and Saenger 2013; Rossler et al. 2015). Following up on the results of Johnson and Hudson (1976), I decided to mark windows of my home, where I have documented 5 bird collision fatalities between the time I moved in and 6 years later. I marked my windows with decals delivered to me via US Postal Service from a commercial vendor. I have documented no fatalities at my windows during the 10 years hence. In my assessment, markers can be effective in some situations. (2)Siting and Designing to minimize impacts (2A) Deciding on location of structure (2B) Deciding on facade and orientation (2C) Selecting type and sizes of windows (2D) Designing to minimize transparency through two parallel facades (2E) Designing to minimize views of interior plants (2F) Landscaping to increase distances between windows and trees and shrubs (3)Monitoring for adaptive management to reduce impacts (3A) Systematic monitoring for fatalities to identify seasonal and spatial patterns (3B) Adjust light management, window marking and other measures as needed. TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON WILDLIFE According to the IS/MND (page 45), the project would generate an average of 16,382 daily miles traveled. This VMT prediction provides a basis for predicting one of the most important potential project impacts to wildlife. Vehicle collisions have accounted for the deaths of many thousands of amphibian, reptile, mammal,bird, and arthropod fauna, and the impacts have often been found to be significant at the population level (Forman et al. 2003). Across North America, traffic impacts have taken devastating tolls on wildlife (Forman et al. 2003). In Canada, 3,562 birds were estimated killed per loo km of road per year (Bishop and Brogan 2013), and the US estimate of avian mortality on roads is 2,200 to 8,405 deaths per loo km per year, or 89 million to 340 million total per year (Loss et al. 2014). Local or regional impacts can be more intense than at the national level. In a recent study of traffic-caused wildlife mortality, investigators found 1,275 carcasses of 49 species of mammals,birds, amphibians and reptiles over 15 months of searches along a 2.5 mile stretch of Vasco Road in Contra Costa County, California (Mendelsohn et al. 2009). Using carcass detection trials performed on land immediately adjacent to the traffic mortality study(Brown et al. 2016) to adjust the found fatalities for the proportion of fatalities not found due to scavenger removal and searcher error, the estimated traffic-caused fatalities was 12,187. This fatality estimate translates to a rate 18 of 3,90o wild animals per mile per year killed. In terms comparable to the national estimates, the estimates from the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) study would translate to 243,74o animals killed per 10o km of road per year, or 29 times that of Loss et al.'s (2014) upper bound estimate and 68 times the Canadian estimate. An analysis is needed of whether increased traffic generated by the project site would similarly result in local impacts on wildlife. Increased use of existing roads would increase wildlife fatalities (see Figure 7 in Kobylarz 2001). It is possible that project-related traffic impacts would far exceed the impacts of land conversion to use for a warehouse. Wildlife roadkill is not randomly distributed, and so it can be predicted. Causal factors include types of roadway, human population density, and temperature (Chen and Wu 2014), as well as time of day and adjacency and extent of vegetation cover(Chen and Wu 2014, Bartonicka et al. 2018), and intersections with streams and riparian vegetation (Bartonicka et al. 2018). For example, species of mammalian Carnivora are killed by vehicle traffic within o.1 miles of stream crossings >4o times other than expected (K. S. Smallwood, 1989-2018 unpublished data). Reptiles are killed on roads where roadside fences end or where fences are damaged (Markle et al. 2017). There has even been a function developed to predict the number of golden eagles killed along the road,where the function includes traffic volume and density of road-killed animals available for eagles to scavenge upon (Lonsdorf et al. 2018). These factors also point the way toward mitigation measures, which should be formulated in an EIR. Predicting project-generated traffic impacts to wildlife The IS/MND predicts the project would generate an average of 16,382 daily miles traveled. This prediction translates to 5,979,43o annual vehicle miles traveled. This is a lot of mileage to be driven at great peril to wildlife that must cross roads to go about their business of foraging, patrolling home ranges, dispersing and migrating (Photos 10 and ii). Despite the obvious risk to wildlife, and despite the multiple papers and books written about this type of impact and how to mitigate them, the IS/MND does not address impacts to wildlife caused by vehicles traveling to and from the project site. Photo io. A Gambel's quail dashes across a road on 3 April 2021. Such road crossings are usually successful, but too often prove fatal to the animal. Photo by Noriko Smallwood. - - 19 Photo li. A mourning dove killed by vehicle traffic on a California road. Photo by Noriko Smallwood, 21 June 2020. • 1 ,; • • • For wildlife vulnerable to front-end collisions and crushing under tires, road mortality can be predicted from the study of Mendelsohn et al. (2009) as a basis, although it would be helpful to have the availability of more studies like that of Mendelsohn et al. (2009) at additional locations. My analysis of the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) data resulted in an estimated 3,90o animals killed per mile along a county road in Contra Costa County. Two percent of the estimated number of fatalities were birds, and the balance was composed of 34% mammals (many mice and pocket mice,but also ground squirrels, desert cottontails, striped skunks,American badgers, raccoons, and others), 52.3% amphibians (large numbers of California tiger salamanders and California red- legged frogs,but also Sierran treefrogs,western toads, arboreal salamanders, slender salamanders and others), and 11.7% reptiles (many western fence lizards,but also skinks, alligator lizards, and snakes of various species). During the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) study, 19,50o cars traveled Vasco Road daily, so the vehicle miles that contributed to my estimate of wildlife fatalities was 19,50o cars and trucks x 2.5 miles x 365 days/year x 1.25 years = 22,242,187.5 vehicle miles per 12,187 wildlife fatalities, or 1,825 vehicle miles per fatality. Based on the daily VMT predicted by the IS/MND, the project would generate 5,979,43o vehicle miles per year, which divided by the 1,825 miles per fatality,would predict 3,276 wildlife fatalities per year. Operations over 5o years would accumulate 163,82o wildlife fatalities. It remains unknown whether and to what degree vehicle tires contribute to carcass removals from the roadway,thereby contributing a negative bias to the fatality estimates I made from the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) fatality counts. The Project's toll on wildlife could be even higher than I predict. The IS/MND does not address this impact in the least. Based on my assumptions and simple calculations, the project-generated traffic would cause substantial, significant impacts to wildlife. There is at least a fair argument that can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to analyze this impact. Mitigation measures to improve wildlife safety along roads are available and are feasible, and they need exploration for their suitability with the proposed project. 20 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The IS/MND implies that cumulative impacts are really just residual impacts of incomplete mitigation of project-level impacts. It states, "As previously discussed, impacts related to the proposed Project are less than significant or can be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The proposed Project's contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable." If the IS/MND accurately represented CEQA's standard, then cumulative effects analysis would be merely an analysis of mitigation efficacy. And if that was the standard,then I must point out that none of the project-level impacts would be offset to any degree by the proposed preconstruction surveys to be performed for nesting birds. But the IS/MND's implied standard is not the standard of analysis of cumulative effects. CEQA defines cumulative impacts, and it outlines two general approaches for performing the analysis. The IS/MND has misrepresented the standard and failed to perform an appropriate analysis.An EIR needs to be prepared, and it needs to include an appropriate, serious analysis of cumulative impacts. When it comes to wildlife, cumulative effects can often be interpreted as effects on the numerical capacity(Smallwood 2015), breeding success, genetic diversity, or other population performance metrics expressed at the regional scale. In the case of migrating birds, the project's cumulative effects could be measured as numerical reductions of breeding birds at far-off breeding sites as migrating adults and next-year's recruits lose access to stop-over habitat. In the cases of wildlife species that are susceptible to traffic collisions, the project's contribution to ongoing and foreseeable traffic-caused mortality can be measured or predicted. Even crude predictions of cumulative impacts are imperative. A fair argument can be made for the need to prepare an EIR to adequately address the project's potential contributions to cumulative impacts on wildlife in the region. MITIGATION BIO-i: Preconstruction survey for breeding birds The IS/MND proposes preconstruction surveys for nesting birds and roosting bats. Preconstruction surveys should be performed, but not as substitute for detection surveys. Preconstruction surveys are not designed or intended to reduce project impacts,let alone to reduce impacts to less than significant levels; they are not even designed to assess impacts. Preconstruction surveys are only intended as last-minute, one-time salvage and rescue operations targeting readily detectable nests or individuals before they are crushed under heavy construction machinery. Because most special- status species are rare and cryptic, and because most species are expert at hiding their nests lest they get predated, most of them will not be detected by preconstruction surveys. Detection surveys are needed to inform preconstruction take-avoidance surveys by mapping out where biologists performing preconstruction surveys are most likely to find animals before the tractor blade finds them. Detection surveys were designed by species 21 experts, often undergoing considerable deliberation and review before adoption. Detection surveys often require repeated efforts using methods known to maximize likelihoods of detection. Detection surveys are needed to assess impacts and to inform the formulation of appropriate mitigation measures, because preconstruction surveys are not intended for these roles either. What is missing from the IS/MND, and what is in greater need than preconstruction surveys, are detection surveys consistent with guidelines and protocols that wildlife ecologists have uniquely developed for use with each special-status species. What is also missing is compensatory mitigation of unavoidable impacts. Following detection surveys, preconstruction surveys should be performed. However, an EIR should be prepared, and it should detail how the results of preconstruction surveys will be reported. Without reporting the results, preconstruction surveys are vulnerable to serving as an empty gesture rather than a mitigation measure. For these reasons, this mitigation measure is insufficient to reduce the project's impacts to nesting birds to less than significant. RECOMMENDED MEASURES Detection Surveys Detection surveys are needed for each of the special-status species in Table 2. Detection surveys are needed for nesting birds and for bats. For bats, I recommend deployment of acoustic detectors and use of thermal-imaging. For birds, I recommend a rigorous nest survey in the absence of an impending construction schedule, including the mapping of nest sites of each species. Because ground squirrels occur in the project area,breeding- season burrowing owl surveys need to be implemented (CDFW 2012),but they should be implemented prior to the circulation of an EIR to more appropriately address potential impacts to burrowing owls and mitigation of those impacts. Habitat Loss and Wildlife Movement The IS/MND provides no mitigation for adverse impacts from habitat loss or to regional movement of wildlife. At a minimum, substantial compensatory mitigation is needed in response to the project's impacts from habitat loss and interference with wildlife movement, including impacts to birds and bats using the site as stop-over or staging during migration. The proposed project site composes one of the last patches of open space available to birds and bats on long-distance dispersal or migration flights. Guidelines on Building Design to Minimize Bird-Window Collisions If the project goes forward, it should adhere to the available guidelines prepared by American Bird Conservancy and the Cities of New York and San Francisco. The American Bird Conservancy(ABC) produced an excellent set of guidelines that recommend actions to: (1) Minimize use of glass; (2) Placing glass behind some type of screening (grilles, shutters, exterior shades); (3) Using glass with inherent properties to reduce collisions, such as patterns, window films, decals or tape; and (4) Turning off 22 lights during migration seasons (Sheppard and Phillips 2015). The City of San Francisco (San Francisco Planning Department 2011) also has a set of building design guidelines, based on the excellent guidelines produced by the New York City Audubon Society(Orff et al. 2007). The ABC document and both the New York and San Francisco documents provide excellent alerting of potential bird-collision hazards as well as many visual examples. The San Francisco Planning Department's (2011)building design guidelines are more comprehensive than those of New York City,but they could have gone further. For example, the San Francisco guidelines probably should have also covered scientific monitoring of impacts as well as compensatory mitigation for impacts that could not be avoided, minimized or reduced. Monitoring and the use of compensatory mitigation should be incorporated at any new building project because the measures recommended in the available guidelines remain of uncertain efficacy, and even if these measures are effective, they will not reduce collision fatalities to zero. The only way to assess efficacy and to quantify post- construction fatalities is to monitor the project for fatalities. Road Mortality Compensatory mitigation is needed for the increased wildlife mortality that will be caused by the project's contribution to increased road traffic in the region. I suggest that this mitigation can be directed toward funding research to identify fatality patterns and effective impact reduction measures. Compensatory mitigation can also be provided in the form of donations to wildlife rehabilitation facilities (see below). Fund Wildlife Rehabilitation Facilities Compensatory mitigation ought also to include funding contributions to wildlife rehabilitation facilities to cover the costs of injured animals that will be delivered to these facilities for care. Most of the injuries will likely be caused by the increased trip generation of cars and trucks. Many animals need treatment caused by collision injuries and an increasing number appear to be injured by the turbulence of passing trucks. Thank you for your attention, Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. REFERENCES CITED AECOM. 2021. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project,Appendix B: Biological Resources Assessment. Report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. 23 Barton, C. M., C. S. Riding, and S. R. Loss. 2017. Magnitude and correlates of bird collisions at glass bus shelters in an urban landscape. Plos One 12. (6): e0178667. https://doi.org/1o.1371/journal.pone.0178667 Bartonicka, T., R. Andragik, M. Dula, J. Sedonik, and M. Bi1. 2018. Identification of local factors causing clustering of animal-vehicle collisions. Journal of Wildlife Management. Journal of Wildlife Management DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21467 Basilio, L. G., D. J. Moreno, and A, J. Piratelli. 2020. Main causes of bird-window collisions: a review. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 92(i): e2o180745 DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202020180745• Bishop, C. A. and J. M. Brogan. 2013. Estimates of Avian Mortality Attributed to Vehicle Collisions in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00604-080202. Borden, W. C., O. M. Lockhart,A. W. Jones, and M. S. Lyons. 2010. Seasonal, taxonomic, and local habitat components of bird-window collisions on an urban university campus in Cleveland, OH. Ohio Journal of Science 110(3):44-52. Bracey,A. M., M.A. Etterson, G. J. Niemi, and R. F. Green. 2016. Variation in bird- window collision mortality and scavenging rates within an urban landscape. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 128:355-367. Brown, B. B., L. Hunter, and S. Santos. 2020. Bird-window collisions: different fall and winter risk and protective factors. PeerJ 8:e9401 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9401 Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, J. Szewczak, and B. Karas. 2016. Final 2012-2015 Report Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. CDFW(California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Sacramento, California. Calvert,A. M., C.A. Bishop, R. D. Elliot, E. A. Krebs, T. M. Kydd, C. S. Machtans, and G. J. Robertson. 2013. A synthesis of human-related avian mortality in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2): 11. http://dx.doi.org/1o.5751/ACE-00581-080211 Chen, X. and S. Wu. 2014. Examining patterns of animal—vehicle collisions in Alabama, USA. Human-Wildlife Interactions 8:235-244. City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland Audubon. 2020. Collisions at the Columbia Building: A synthesis of pre- and post-retrofit monitoring. Environmental Services of City of Portland, Oregon. 24 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project. Prepared by AECOM for CRP/WP Alta Cuvee Venture, LLC. Rancho Cucamonga, California. Cusa M, Jackson DA, Mesure M. 2015. Window collisions by migratory bird species: urban geographical patterns and habitat associations. Urban Ecosystems 18(4):1-20. DOI 10.1007/s11252-015-0459-3. Dunn, E. H. 1993. Bird mortality from striking residential windows in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:302-309. Forman, T. T., D. Sperling, J. A. Bisonette,A. P. Clevenger, C. D. Cutshall,V. H. Dale, L. Fahrig, R. France, C. R. Goldman, K. Heanue, J. A. Jones, F. J. Swanson, T. Turrentine, and T. C. Winter. 2003. Road Ecology. Island Press, Covello, California. Gelb,Y. and N. Delacretaz. 2009. Windows and vegetation: Primary factors in Manhattan bird collisions. Northeastern Naturalist 16:455-470. Gomez-Moreno,V. del C., J. R. Herrera-Herrera, and S. Nino-Maldonado. 2018. Bird collisions in windows of Centro Universitario Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Huitzil, Revista Mexicana de Ornitologia 19(2): 227-236. https://doi.org/1o.28947/ hrmo.2018.19.2.347 Hager, S. B, and M. E. Craig. 2014. Bird-window collisions in the summer breeding season. PeerJ 2:e460 DOI 10.7717/peerJ.460. Hager, S. B., H. Trudell, K. J. McKay, S. M. Crandall, and L. Mayer. 2008. Bird density and mortality at windows. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:550-564• Hager, S. B., B. J. Cosentino, and K. J. McKay. 2012. Scavenging effects persistence of avian carcasses resulting from window collisions in an urban landscape. Journal of Field Ornithology 83:203-211. Hager S. B., B. J. Cosentino, K J. McKay, C. Monson, W. Zuurdeeg, and B. Blevins. 2013. Window area and development drive spatial variation in bird-window collisions in an urban landscape. PLoS ONE 8(1): e53371• doi:1o.1371/journal.pone.0053371 Johnson, R. E., and G. E. Hudson. 1976. Bird mortality at a glassed-in walkway in Washington State. Western Birds 7:99-107. Kahle, L. Q., M. E. Flannery, and J. P. Dumbacher. 2016. Bird-window collisions at a west-coast urban park museum: analyses of bird biology and window attributes from Golden Gate Park, San Francisco. PLoS ONE 11(1):e14460o DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.o144600. 25 Klem, D., Jr. 1989. Bird-window collisions. Wilson Bulletin 101:606-620. Klem, D., Jr. 1990. Collisions between birds and windows: mortality and prevention. Journal of Field Ornithology 61:120-128. Klem, D., Jr. 2009. Preventing bird-window collisions. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121:314-321. Klem, D., Jr. 2010. Avian mortality at windows: the second largest human source of bird mortality on earth. Pages 244-251 in Proc. Fourth Int. Partners in Flight Conference: Tundra to Tropics. Klem, D., Jr. 2011. Evaluating the effectiveness of Acopian Birdsavers to deter or prevent bird-glass collisions. Unpublished report. Klem, D., Jr. and P. G. Saenger. 2013. Evaluating the effectiveness of select visual signals to prevent bird-window collisions. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125:406-411. Klem, D. Jr., C. J. Farmer, N. Delacretaz,Y. Gelb and P. G. Saenger. 2009. Architectural and landscape risk factors associated with bird-glass collisions in an urban environment. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121:126-134. Kobylarz, B. 2001. The effect of road type and traffic intensity on amphibian road mortality. Journal of Service Learning in Conservation Biology 1:10-15. Kummer J.A., and E. M. Bayne. 2015. Bird feeders and their effects on bird-window collisions at residential houses.Avian Conservation and Ecology 10(2):6 DOI 10.5751/ACE-00787-100206. Kummer, J. A., E. M. Bayne, and C. S. Machtans. 2016. Use of citizen science to identify factors affecting bird-window collision risk at houses. The Condor: Ornithological Applications 118:624-639. DOI: 10.165o/CONDOR-16-26.1 Lonsdorf, E. C.A. Sanders-Reed, C. Boal, and T. D.Allison. 2018. Modeling golden eagle-vehicle collisions to design mitigation strategies. Journal of Wildlife Management 82:1633-i644. Loss, S. R., T. Will, and P. P. Marra. 2014. Estimation of Bird-Vehicle Collision Mortality on U.S. Roads. Journal of Wildlife Management 78:763-771. Loss, S. R., T. Will, S. S. Loss, and P. P. Marra. 2014. Bird—building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. The Condor: Ornithological Applications 116:8-23. DOI: 10.165o/CONDOR-13-o90.1 Loss, S. R., S. Lao, J. W. Eckles,A. W.Anderson, R. B. Blair, and R. J. Turner. 2019. Factors influencing bird-building collisions in the downtown area of a major North 26 American city. PLoS ONE 14(11): eo224164. https://doi.org/1o.1371/journal. pone.0224164 Machtans, C. S., C. H. R. Wedeles, and E. M. Bayne. 2013. A first estimate for Canada of the number of birds killed by colliding with building windows.Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2):6. http://dx.doi.org/1o.5751/ACE-oo568-080206 Markle, C. E., S. D. Gillingwater, R. Levick, P. Chow-Fraser. 2017. The true cost of partial fencing: evaluating strategies to reduce reptile road mortality. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41:342-35o. Mendelsohn, M., W. Dexter, E. Olson, and S. Weber. 2009. Vasco Road wildlife movement study report. Report to Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Martinez, California. Ocampo-Penuela, N., R. S. Winton, C. J. Wu, E. Zambello, T. W. Wittig and N. L. Cagle . 2016. Patterns of bird-window collisions inform mitigation on a university campus. PeerJ4:e1652;DOI1o.7717/peerj.1652 O'Connell, T. J. 2001. Avian window strike mortality at a suburban office park. The Raven 72:141-149. Orff, K., H. Brown, S. Caputo, E. J. McAdams, M. Fowle, G. Phillips, C. DeWitt, and Y. Gelb. 2007. Bird-safe buildings guidelines. New York City Audubon, New York. Overing, R. 1938. High mortality at the Washington Monument. The Auk 55:679. Parkins, K. L., S. B. Elbin, and E. Barnes. 2015. Light, glass, and bird—building collisions in an urban park. Northeastern Naturalist 22:84-94. Porter,A., and A. Huang. 2015. Bird collisions with glass: UBC pilot project to assess bird collision rates in Western North America. UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report. Report to Environment Canada, UBC SEEDS and UBC BRITE. Rebolo-Ifran, N.,A. di Virgilio, and S. A. Lambertucci. 2019. Drivers of bird-window collisions in southern South America: a two-scale assessment applying citizen science. Scientific Reports 9:18148 I https://doi.org/1o.1o38/s41598-o19-54351-3 Riding, C. S., T. J. O'Connell, and S. R. Loss. 2020. Building façade-level correlates of bird—window collisions in a small urban area. The Condor: Ornithological Applications 122:1-14. Rossler, M., E. Nemeth, and A. Bruckner. 2015. Glass pane markings to prevent bird- window collisions: less can be more. Biologia 70: 535-541. DOI: 10.1515/biolog- 2015-0057 27 Rosenberg, K. V.,A. M. Dokter, P. J. Blancher, J. R. Sauer,A. C. Smith, P. A. Smith, J. C. Stanton,A. Panjabi , L. Helft , M. Parr, and P. P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 10.1126/science.aaw1313 (2019). Runge, C. A., T. G. Martin, H. P. Possingham, S. G. Willis, and R.A. Fuller. 2014. Conserving mobile species. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 12(7): 395-402, doi:10.1890/130237. Sabo,A. M., N. D. G. Hagemeyer,A. S. Lahey, and E. L. Walters. 2016. Local avian density influences risk of mortality from window strikes. PeerJ 4:e2170; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2170 San Francisco Planning Department. 2011. Standards for bird-safe buildings. San Francisco Planning Department, City and County of San Francisco, California. Schneider, R. M., C. M. Barton, K. W. Zirkle, C. F. Greene, and K. B. Newman. 2018. Year-round monitoring reveals prevalence of fatal bird-window collisions at the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center. PeerJ 6:e4562 https://doi.org/10.7717/ peerJ.4562 Sheppard, C., and G. Phillips. 2015. Bird-friendly building design, end Ed., American Bird Conservancy, The Plains, Virginia. Shuford,W. D., and T. Gardali, [eds.]. 2008. California bird species of special concern: a ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and corridors. Pages 84-101 in M. L. Morrison and H.A. Mathewson, Eds., Wildlife habitat conservation: concepts, challenges, and solutions. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Somerlot, K. E. 2003. Survey of songbird mortality due to window collisions on the Murray State University campus. Journal of Service Learning in Conservation Biology 1:1-19. Taylor, R.A. J., and L. R. Taylor. 1979. A behavioral model for the evolution of spatial dynamics. Pp. 1-28 in R. M.Anderson, B. D. Turner, and L. R. Taylor (editors). Population dynamics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Taylor, P. D., S. A. Mackenzie, B. G. Thurber,A. M. Calvert,A. M. Mills, L. P. McGuire, and C. G. Guglielmo. 2011. Landscape movements of migratory birds and bats reveal an expanded scale of stopover. PlosOne 6(11): e27054• doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027054• 28 TMCapital. 2019. 2019 Building products report: enduring growth beyond short-term challenges. https://www.tmcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2o19/08/ BuildingProd AnnualReport 2019-08-14.pdf Warnock, N. 2010. Stopping vs. staging: the difference between a hop and a jump. Journal of Avian Biology 41:621-626. Winton, R. S., N. Ocampo-Penuela, and N. Cagle. 2018. Geo-referencing bird-window collisions for targeted mitigation. PeerJ 6:e4215; DOI 10.7717/peerJ.4215 Yahner, R. H. 1982. Avian nest densities and nest-site selection in farmstead shelterbelts. The Wilson Bulletin 94:156-175. Young, H. 1948. A comparative study of nesting birds in a five-acre park. The Wilson Bulletin 61:36-47. Zink, R. M., and J. Eckles. 2010. Twin cities bird-building collisions: a status update on "Project Birdsafe." The Loon 82:34-37. 29 Exhibit C S WA P E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street,Suite 201 Santa Monica,CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G,C.Hg. (949)887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310)795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com September 30, 2021 Richard Drury Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94612 Subject: Comments on the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project Dear Mr. Drury, We have reviewed the August 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND")for the Alta Cuvee Mixed Use Project ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City").The Project proposes to construct a 260-unit apartment building, 3,339-SF of commercial space, 5,500-SF of amenity space, as well as a total of 465 parking spaces, on the 5.2-acre site. Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the surrounding environment. Air Quality Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The IS/MND's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2 (p. 4-8).1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data,total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known,the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model,the Project's 1 CAPCOA(November 2017)CalEEMod User's Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4. construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated.These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected. When reviewing the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality Impacts Assessment ("AQAssessment") and the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts Assessment ("GHG Assessment") as Appendix A and Appendix F to the IS/MND, respectively,we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result,the Project's construction and operational emissions are underestimated.As a result, an EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality. Incorrect CO2 Intensity Factor Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" and "Alta Cuvee Bus Bay" models include a reduction to the default CO2 intensity factor(see excerpts below) (Appendix A, pp. 30, 91; Appendix F, pp. 28, 87). "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" ITable blame I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblProjectCharacteristics CC2lntensiryFactor 702.44 531.03 .5 a- a "Alta Cuvee Bus Bay" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New value tblPrajectCharacteristics CC2lntensityFactor 702.44 471.24 i As you can see in the excerpts above, the CO2 intensity factor was decreased from the default value of 702.44-to 531.98-and 471.24-pounds per megawatt hour("lbs/MWhr"), respectively, in the models. As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.2 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data"table, the justifications for this change are (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 26, 91; Appendix F, pp. 23, 86): • "Electricity supplied by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility, which is not available as input selection. SCE used as surrogate" • "SB 100 mandates 44% renewable by end of 2024. SCE CO2 factor assumes 40% renewables when operations begin. SCE 2019 power mix= 36% renewables" However, these justifications remain insufficient. Review of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2020 Power Content Label demonstrates that the City's CO2 intensity factor is 630 lbs/MWh (see excerpt below)3: 2 CalEEMod User Guide,available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p.2,9 3 2020 POWER CONTENT LABEL, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility,available at: https://cityofrc.prod.acquia- sites.com/sites/default/files/2021-08/E N G-RCM U%20PCL%202020.pdf. 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity(lbs CO2eIMWh) City of Rancho 2020 CA Utility Average Cucamonga 630 466 1000 800 •City of Rancho 600 - Cucamonga 400 ■2020 CA 200 Utility Average 0 As such,the CO2 intensity factor is underestimated by approximately 98-and 159-lbs/MWhr, respectively. These inconsistencies present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the CO2 intensity factor to calculate the Project's GHG emissions associated with electricity use.4 Thus, by including an underestimated CO2 intensity factor,the models underestimate the Project's potential GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Failure to Model All Required Parking Regarding the amount of required and proposed parking on the Project site,the IS/MND provides the following table (see excerpt below) (p. 1-15,Table 1-2): Table 1-2. Required and Proposed Parking Floorplan Units Required Total Parking Total Parking Requested Parking Per Required Proposed Parking Unit Exception A (1 Bedroom) 184 1.5 276 B (2 Bedroom) 55 2 110 C (3 Bedroom) 20 2 40 414 13(3%) Live/Work (1 1 1.5 1 Bedroom) Commercial 3,339 SF 1 space/250 4 4 9 (69%) SF Guests 260 0.33 86 47 39 (45%) Total 260 - 526 465 61112%) Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Table 17.64.050-1 for multi-family development Note:The parking code requires more than half of the parking for multifamily development to be garaged;the proposed Project does not provide dedicated garages for reach unit 4"CalEEMod User's Guide."CAPCOA, November 2017,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 17. 3 Additionally, regarding the requested parking exception,the IS/MND states: "The 12 percent parking reduction would require a minor exception approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga.The parking exception must be compatible with the surrounding area and adjoining uses. In compliance with the City Code, a parking management plan (Appendix I) has been completed to demonstrate how the proposed land uses would utilize the parking spaces, assign parking spaces to apartment units, and support the 12 percent parking reduction." As demonstrated above,the Project is pending approval from the City to reduce the amount of parking by 12%,from 526 to 465 spaces.As this request is yet to be approved, the model should have included the entire amount of required parking in order to conduct the most conservative analysis. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use" model includes only 465 parking spaces' (Appendix A, pp. 25; Appendix F, pp. 23). Land Uses Size I Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area I Population General Office Building 7.60 1000sg0 i 0 00 4,900.00 1 0 1 1 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 265.00 Space 0 00 106,606.00 1 • 1 0 i F I Parking Lot 20000 Space 180 80,OW.00 0 1 1 I City Park • 0.33 Acre i 0 33 14,374 80. 1 0 F Recreational Swimming Pool 3.00 1000sgfl 0 07 3,060.00 1 0 - Apartments Mid Rise 250 00 i F Dwelling Unit 3 00 228,606 00 1 785 I Condo/Townhouse • 1.00 Dwelling Unit F 000 157000 i 3 Step Mall 3.34 1 1000sgfl 0 00 3,33900 0 As you can see in the excerpt above, the total amount of required parking is underestimated by 61 spaces.This is incorrect, as we are unable to verify if the City will approve or deny the Project's requested parking exception. This potential underestimation presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses the square footage of parking for certain calculations such as determining the area to be painted and stripped (i.e.,VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume to be ventilated (i.e., energy impacts).6 Thus, by failing to include the total amount of required parking spaces,the model underestimates the Project's construction-related and operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Reduction to Land Use Size According to the IS/MND,the Project proposes to construct "259 apartment units, ranging from 715 square feet to 1,367 square feet" (p. 1-13). Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the correct number of residential units (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 25; Appendix F, pp. 23). 5 265 "Enclosed Parking with Elevator"spaces+200"Parking Lot"spaces=465 6"CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2. 4 Land Uses I Size I Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area I Population General Office Building 7.60 1000sgfl i 0 00 4,900 00 I 0 i - Enclosed Parking with Elevator 20500 Space b 0 00 106,DOD_00 i 0 F ; i Parking Lot 200.00 Space 1 80 i 80,000 OD i 0 - ; ; F I k City Park 0.33 Acre i 0 33 14,374 80 I 0 F Recreational Swimming Pool • 3.00 1000sgfl 0 07 i 30D0 00 i 0 1 1 .- I Apartments Mid Rise 25000 Dwelling Unit 3 00 228,DOD_00 I 785 Condofiownhouse • 1.00 • Dwelling Unit 1 0 00 1570 00 I 3 Step Mall • 3.34 1000sgfl 0 00 3,335.00 0 However,further review demonstrates that the square footage associated with the residential land use floor surface area was reduced from the default value of 259,000-to 228,000-SF (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 29; Appendix F, pp. 27). ITable Name Column Name I Default Value New Value r tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 259,000 00 228,000 00 I As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.'According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table,the justification provided for this change is: "Site Plan; Project population" (Appendix A, pp. 25;Appendix F, pp. 23). Furthermore, as previously stated,the IS/MND indicates that the apartment units will range from 715-SF to 1,367-SF (p. 1-13).Thus, the total square footage of the residential space will range from 185,185-SF8 to 354,053-SF.9 Regardless, as the IS/MND fails to explicitly state the total square footage of the residential land use, the reduction to the default floor surface area is unsubstantiated. This unsubstantiated reduction presents an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that go into the model's calculations.The square footage of a land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts).10 Thus, by including an unsubstantiated reduction to the residential floor surface area, the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related and operational emissions, and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default architectural coating emission factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 27; Appendix F, pp. 25). 'CalEEMod User Guide,available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p.2,9 8 Calculated: 715-SF * 259 units= 185,185-SF total. 9 Calculated: 1,367-SF * 259 units=354,053-SF total. 10 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 28. 5 Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior • 106.00 50.00 4 } — tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating • EF_Nonresidential_Interior 10090 50.00 4 + — tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nanresidential_Interiar 100.O0 50.00 iblAreaCoating • Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exteriar 100 50 iblAreaCoating • Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100 50 4 4- As you can see in the excerpt above, the nonresidential exterior and interior architectural and area coating emission factors were each reduced from the default value of 100-to 50-grams per liter("g/L"). As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.11 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table,the justification provided for these changes is: "SCAQMD Building Envelope-50 g/L" (Appendix A, 26; Appendix F, pp. 24). However,these changes remain unsupported for two reasons. First,the IS/MND and associated documents fail to mention the building envelope category of paint, and its associated VOC content limit of 50 g/L as required by SCAQMD Rule 1113, whatsoever. Second,the IS/MND and associated documents fail to explicitly require the Project to use only building envelope coatings during Project construction and operation of the proposed nonresidential land uses whatsoever. As such,we cannot verify that the revised values are accurate. These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the architectural and area coating emission factors to calculate the Project's reactive organic gas/volatile organic compound ("ROG"/"VOC") emissions.12 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the default architectural and area coating emission factors,the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related and operational ROG/VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default gas fireplace values (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 28; Appendix F, pp. 26). 11 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 12 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/01 user-39-s- guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p.35,40. 6 lI Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblFireplaces Fireplace6ayYear 25.00 DM tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHaurDay 3.60 6.06 + + - tblFireplaces FireplaceHaurDay 360 { DOD tblFireplaces 1 FireplaceWoadMass 1,01920 i D.OD 1. 1-tblFireplaces FireplaceWoadMass 1,019.20 I D.OD tblFireplaces 1 NumberGas 226.15 D.OD tblFireplaces NumberGas 0.85 DAD 4 ffiIFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 25.9D 11 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 0.10 I 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 12.95 I DOD - tblFireplaces NumberWood T 0_D5 + D.OD T -L As you can see in the excerpt above, the model assumes that the Project would not include any gas fireplaces. As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.13 However,the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table fails to provide a justification (Appendix A, pp. 25-27; Appendix F, pp. 23-25). Furthermore,the IS/MND indicates that the east building would include a courtyard with an outdoor fireplace (p. 1-13).As such,the IS/MND states at least one fireplace would be installed on the Project site. However,the IS/MND fails to mention or justify the assumption that no gas fireplaces would be included in the residential building. As such, we cannot verify the revised number of gas fireplaces. This potential underestimation presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses the number of gas fireplaces to calculate the Project's area-source operational emissions.14 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the number gas fireplaces,the model may underestimate the Project's area-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Solid Waste Generation Rates Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several reductions to the default solid waste generation rates (see excerpts below) (Attachment A, pp. 30; Appendix F, pp. 28). Table Name Column Name Default Value I New Value I tblSolidWaste 4 SolidWasteGeneratianRate 119.14 119.60 J bl5olidWaste SolidWasteGeneratianRate 7.67 6 OD tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGeneratianRate 17.16 G.D6 As you can see in the excerpt above, the total solid waste generation rate was cumulatively decreased by 23.71 tons per year("tons/year").15 As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires 13 CalEEMod User's Guide,available at::http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/01 user-39-s- guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 2,9. 14 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p.40. 15 Calculated: (119.14 tons/year+7.07 tons/year+17.10 tons/year)-(119.60 tons/year)=23.71 tons/year. 7 any changes to model defaults be justified.16 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non- Default Data" table,the justification provided for these changes is: "Remove duplicate waste generation" (Appendix A, 26; Appendix F, pp. 24). Furthermore, regarding the Project's anticipated solid waste generation rate, the IS/MND states: "It is anticipated that the proposed Project would accommodate approximately 788 future residents, and operational activities would generate approximately 1.6 tons per day of solid waste during Project operation" (p.4-73). As demonstrated above,the Project anticipates generating 1.6 tons of solid waste per day, or roughly 584 tons/year.17 However,the model includes a total of only 123.6 tons/yearl8(see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 85; Appendix F, pp. 82). Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MTiyr Apartments Mid 119.6 24.2777 r 1.4348 r 0.0000 ,0.1170 Rise City Park 0.03 6.0900e- 3.6000e r C.000O 0.0151 003 ; 004 ; r Condofrownhous 0.46 0.0934T5.5200e 0.0000 T 0.23.3 e 003 r r i Enclosed Parking 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator General Office 0 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Building Parking Lot 0 0.0000 D.OcooTi-o.coo-o[77 0.0000 Recreational 0 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Swimming Pool Strip Mall 3.51 0.7125 0.0421 0.0000 1.7652 Total 25.0897 1.4828 0.0000 62.1586 As such,the solid waste included in the model is underestimated by 460.4 tons/year.19 Thus,the model is inconsistent with the information provided in the IS/MND. This underestimation presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses the solid waste generation rates to calculate the Project's operation GHG emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste into landfills.20 Thus, by including underestimated solid waste generation rates,the model underestimates the Project's operational GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. 16 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 17(1.6 tons/day)x 365 days=584 tons/year. 18(119.6 tons/year for"Apartments Mid Rise")+(0.03 tons/year for"City Park")+(0.46 tons/year for "Condo/Townhouse")+(3.51 tons/year"Strip Mall")= 123.6 tons/year of total solid waste. 19(584 tons/year proposed by the IS/MND)-(123.6 tons/year included in the model) 20 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p.46. 8 Underestimated Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix Percentages Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use" model includes several changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix percentages (see excerpts below) (Appendix A, pp. 28-29;Appendix F, pp. 26-27). Table Name I Column Name I Default Value I New Value I tblFleetM ix HHD 0.07 DOD + - tblFleetMix 4. HHD 0D7 0.OD 4 + - tblFleetM ix LDA • 0.56 0.60 tblFleetM ix LDA • 0.56 0.60 + - tblFleetM ix LDT1 • 0.04 0.06 tblFleetM ix I LDT1 • 0.04 6.06 tblFleetM ix LDT2 0.18 0.19 4 + - tblFleetM ix LDT2 • 0.18 0 19 tblFleetM ix I LHD1 • 0.01 0.02 • + - tblFleetMix 4. LHD1 0.01 0.02 4 -1- tIDIFIeethl ix ix LHD2 • 4.7940e-003 5.0000e-003 . tblFleetM ix LHD2 4.7940e-003 5.0000e-003 i 4 tbIFIeetMix M CY • 5.7250e-003 0.01 4 + - tb I FI eetM ix M CY • 5.7250e-003 0.01 tblFleetM ix MDV • 0.11 0.12 4 + - tblFleetMix MDV • 0.11 0.12 tbIFIeetMix I MH • 8.3060e-004 0.00 tbIFIeetMix MI-I 8.3060e-004 0.00 4 + - tblFleetMix MHD • 0.02 0.00 tbIFIeetMix MHD • 0.02 0 00 • + - tbIFIeetMix ()BUS • 1.3650e-003 0.00 4 + - tblFleetMix ()BUS • 1.3650e-603 0 00 tbIFIeetMix 4. SBUS 7.9900e-004 0.00 + - tblFleetMix SBUS • 7.9900e-004 0 00 tbIFIeetMix I UBUS • 1 4910e-603 0.90 tbIFIeetMix UBUS 1 4910e-003 0 00 + As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.21 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table,the justification provided for these changes is: "Residential Trips" (Appendix A, pp. 27;Appendix F, pp. 25). However, these changes remain unsupported, as the IS/MND and associated documents fail to mention the operational vehicle fleet mix or justify the revised percentages whatsoever.According to the CalEEMod User's Guide: 21 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 9 "CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site-or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA" (emphasis added).22 Here, as the IS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised operational vehicle fleet mix percentages, we cannot verify the changes. These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as operational vehicle fleet mix percentages are used by CalEEMod to calculate the Project's operational emissions associated with on-road vehicles.23 Thus, by including unsubstantiated changes to the default operational vehicle fleet mix,the model may underestimate the Project's mobile-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes several changes to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 30; Appendix F, pp. 28). Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblOffRaadEquipment HorsePower 78.06 — 15.60 ILrI i tblCffRaadEquipment HorsePower • 76.06 15.00 As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.24 According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table,the justification provided for these changes is: "Project Inventory" (Appendix A, pp. 26;Appendix F, pp. 24). However, the IS/MND and associated documents fail to mention or justify the revised horsepower values whatsoever. According to the CalEEMod User's Guide: "CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site-or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA" (emphasis added).25 Here, as the IS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised horsepower values, we cannot verify the changes. These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as CalEEMod uses horsepower values to calculate emissions associated with off-road construction equipment.26 By including unsubstantiated changes to the default off-road construction equipment horsepower values,the model may underestimate the 22 CalEEMod Model 2013.2.2 User's Guide,available at:http://www.aq_md.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/usersguideSept2016.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 12. 23 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 24 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 25 CalEEMod Model 2013.2.2 User's Guide,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/usersguideSept2016.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 12. 26 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 32. 10 Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Application of Construction-related Mitigation Measures Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the following construction-related mitigation measure (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 38; Appendix F, pp. 36): 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.27 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data"table,the justification provided for this inclusion is: "SCAQMD Rule 403" (Appendix A, pp. 24;Appendix F, pp. 22). However, the inclusion of the above-mentioned construction-related mitigation measure remains unsupported for two reasons. First,the inclusion of the construction-related mitigation measures, based on the Project's compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, is unsupported.According to the Association of Environmental Professionals ("AEP") CEQA Portal Topic Paper on mitigation measures: "By definition, mitigation measures are not part of the original project design. Rather, mitigation measures are actions taken by the lead agency to reduce impacts to the environment resulting from the original project design. Mitigation measures are identified by the lead agency after the project has undergone environmental review and are above-and-beyond existing laws, regulations, and requirements that would reduce environmental impacts."28 As you can see in the excerpt above, mitigation measures are not part of the original project design and are intended to go above-and-beyond existing regulatory requirements.As such,the inclusion of these measures, based solely on SCAQMD Rule 403, is unsubstantiated. Second, according to the above-mentioned AEP report: "While not 'mitigation', a good practice is to include those project design feature(s)that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project 27 CalEEMod User Guide,available at:http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2,9 28"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."AEP, February 2020,available at: https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p.5. 11 that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact."29 As you can see in the excerpts above, project design features ("PDFs")that are not formally included as mitigation measures may be eliminated from the Project's design altogether.Thus, as the above- mentioned construction-related measure is not formally included as a mitigation measure, we cannot guarantee that it would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. By including a construction-related mitigation measures without properly committing to its implementation,the model may underestimate the Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project" model includes the following energy-, area-, and water-related operational mitigation measures (see excerpts below) (Attachment A, pp. 72, 77, 79; Appendix F, pp. 70, 75, 77): Energy-Related Mitigation Measures: 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting Install Energy Efficient Appliances Area-Related Mitigation Measures: 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area No Hearths Installed Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Water-Related Mitigation Measures: 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 29"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."AEP, February 2020,available at: https://cegaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 6. 12 As a result of the above-mentioned water-related operational mitigation measures,the model includes an efficient irrigation water use reduction of 20% (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 32;Appendix F, pp. 30). Table Name I Column Name I Default Value I New Value r tblWaterMAitigation •UseWaterEfficientlrngationSystemPercen� 6.I 26 L [Reduction a a As previously mentioned,the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.30 However the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data"table, only provides justification for the inclusion of the area-related operational mitigation measures,which states: "SCAQMD Rule 1113" (Appendix A, pp. 27;Appendix F, pp. 25). Furthermore, regarding sustainable design features,the IS/MND states: "The proposed Project would be designed to exceed the 2019 Title 24 energy efficient standards by approximately 7.2 percent in one building and by approximately 2.5 percent in the other, approximately 10 percent more efficient than 2016 Title 24 standards [...] Water and energy efficient mechanical equipment and electric appliances (i.e., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning(HVAC), water heaters, kitchen appliances and plumbing) that require less usage intensity for operation and comply with Title 24 of the California Government Code" (p. 1-15). However,the inclusion of the above-mentioned operational mitigation measures remains unsupported for two reasons. First,the inclusion of the operational mitigation measures, based on the Project's purported compliance with Title 24 and SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsupported.As previously stated, according to the AEP CEQA Portal Topic Paper on mitigation measures: "By definition, mitigation measures are not part of the original project design. Rather, mitigation measures are actions taken by the lead agency to reduce impacts to the environment resulting from the original project design. Mitigation measures are identified by the lead agency after the project has undergone environmental review and are above-and-beyond existing laws, regulations, and requirements that would reduce environmental impacts."31 As you can see in the excerpt above, mitigation measures "are not part of the original project design" and are intended to go "above-and-beyond" existing regulatory requirements. As such,the inclusion of these measures, based on the Project's vague compliance with Title 24 and SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsubstantiated. 3°CalEEMod User's Guide,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/01 user-39-s- guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 2,9. 31"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."AEP, February 2020,available at: https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p.5. 13 Second, the IS/MND fails to formally include the above-mentioned design features as Project-level mitigation measures.This is incorrect, as AEP guidance states: "While not "mitigation", a good practice is to include those project design feature(s)that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact" (emphasis added).32 As you can see in the excerpt above, design features that are not formally included as mitigation measures in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") may be eliminated from the Project's design altogether.Thus, as the above-mentioned energy-, area-, and water-related operational measures are not formally included as mitigation measures,we cannot guarantee that they would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site.As a result,the inclusion of the above- mentioned operational mitigation measures in the model is incorrect. By including several operational mitigation measures without properly committing to their implementation,the model may underestimate the Project's operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Failure to Provide Summer and Winter CalEEMod Output Files As previously discussed,the IS/MND's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated by CalEEMod.2016.3.2 (p. 4-8).33 CalEEMod provides three types of output files—annual, summer, and winter. Specifically,the CalEEMod User's Guide states: "The available reports include: Annual, Summer(peak) Daily, Winter(peak) Daily, Mitigation and Summary of peak daily emissions and annual GHG emissions.34 As demonstrated above,the CalEEMod summer and winter output files provide peak daily emissions estimates in pounds per day("lbs/day"). Furthermore,the IS/MND quantifies the Project's construction- related and operational maximum daily criteria air pollutant emissions and compares them to the applicable SCAQMD thresholds (see excerpts below) (p.4-8,Table 4.3-14-9,Table 4.3-2). 32"CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures."AEP, February 2020,available at: https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 6. 33 CAPCOA(November 2017)CalEEMod User's Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4. 34 CAPCOA(November 2017)CalEEMod User's Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p.61. 14 Table 4.3-1.Maximum Regional Daily Emissions During Construction VDC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (lbs/day) (Ibslday) Maximum Regional Daily Emissions 29.1 69.8 81.3 0.2 8.9 4.1 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source:TAHA 2021 CO=carbon monoxide;lbs/day=pounds per day;NOx=nitrogen oxide;PM10=particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter;PM2.5=particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter;SOx=sulfur oxide;VOC=volatile organic compounds Table 4.3-2.Daily Operational Emissions (2024} VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (Ibslday) (lbs/day) (Ibslday) Daily Operational Emissions' 8.7 6.0 56.3 0.1 12.8 3.6 Regional Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source:TAHA 2021 'I Includes area(e.g.,consumer products and landscaping), energy(consumption of energy), and mobile(e.g., vehicle trips)sources CO=carbon monoxide;Ibslday=pounds per day;NOx=nitrogen oxide;PM10=particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter;PM2.5=particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter;SOx=sulfur oxide;VOC=volatile organic compounds However, review of the AQ Assessment and GHG Assessment demonstrates that the summer and winter CalEEMod output files are not disclosed. As such, we cannot verify that the above-mentioned emissions estimates are an accurate reflection of the peak daily emissions reported in the IS/MND's CalEEMod output files. As the IS/MND fails to provide the summer and winter output files,the IS/MND's air quality analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.An EIR should be prepared to include an adequate air quality analysis and disclose all CalEEMod output files. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND concludes that the proposed Project would have a less-than-significant health risk impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis ("HRA"). Specifically, regarding potential health risk impacts associated with Project construction, the IS/MND states: "The SCAQMD has not established a mass daily screening threshold for diesel emissions, and the only established TAC significance thresholds require estimating concentrations of TAC in ambient air resulting from project emissions using intensive air dispersion modeling. However, the low magnitude of diesel exhaust emissions from construction equipment combined with the brevity of the construction period and local meteorological characteristics indicate that the proposed Project would not generate substantial emissions over an extended period of time that could cause a health risk to adjacent land uses. In addition,the size of the Project site indicates that only during a limited portion of construction activities would heavy-duty diesel- powered equipment be operating within 100 feet of sensitive receptors, and all construction equipment would be maintained in accordance with the CARB Portable Engine Air Toxics Control Measure and the Off-Road Diesel Regulation to control emissions to the maximum extent feasible.Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations" (p.4-11). 15 As demonstrated above,the IS/MND concludes that the Project would result in a less-than-significant construction-related health risk impact because the low magnitude of diesel exhaust emissions from construction equipment,the short-term construction schedule, and the local meteorological conditions would not generate substantial toxic air contaminant ("TAC") emissions. Furthermore, regarding potential health risk impacts associated with Project operation,the IS/MND states: "The proposed Project would introduce a new multi-family residential land use to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would be consistent with existing surrounding land use developments. Operation of the proposed Project would not create a new substantial permanent source of air pollutant emissions to the Project area.The proposed Project does not involve large boilers, generators, or any other equipment or facilities that would warrant special permitting under SCAQMD regulations.The operational emissions analysis shown in Table 4.3-2 demonstrates that operation of the proposed Project would not produce emissions capable of resulting in substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations.Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations" (p. 4-12). As demonstrated in the excerpt above,the IS/MND concludes that the Project would result in a less- than-significant operational health risk impact because the Project's operational criteria air pollutants would not result in substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptor locations. However,the IS/MND fails to mention or discuss the Project's operational TAC emissions whatsoever. However,the IS/MND's evaluation of the Project's potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than- significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons. First, by failing to quantitatively evaluate the Project's construction-related and operational TAC emissions,the IS/MND fails to make a reasonable effort to connect these emissions to potential health risk impacts posed to nearby existing sensitive receptors.This is incorrect, as construction of the proposed Project would produce diesel particulate matter("DPM") emissions through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a potential construction period of approximately 24 months (p. 1- 16). Furthermore,the IS/MND indicates that Project operation would generate approximately 1,503 average daily vehicle trips, which would generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (p.4-9). However, the IS/MND fails to discuss Project- generated TACs or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the Project's construction-related and operational TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the IS/MND is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project with the potential adverse impacts on human health. Second,the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment("OEHHA"), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015.This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA.The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer 16 risks to nearby sensitive receptors. As the Project's construction duration vastly exceeds the 2-month requirement set forth by OEHHA, it is clear that the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance. Furthermore,the OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR"). Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore,we recommend that health risk impacts from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30- year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month requirement set forth by OEHHA.These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, we recommend that an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions be included in an EIR for the Project. Third, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors,the IS/MND fails to compare the excess health risk impact to the applicable SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.35 Thus, pursuant to CEQA, an analysis of the health risk posed to nearby, existing receptors from Project construction and operation should have been conducted. Screening-Level Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk analysis we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.36 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA37 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated ("CAPCOA")"guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening analyses ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. In order to estimate the health risk impacts posed to residential sensitive receptors as a result of the Project's construction-related and operational TAC emissions,we prepared a preliminary HRA using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the CalEEMod output files included in the IS/MND. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.The IS/MND's CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate 35"South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds."SCAQMD,April 2019,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/defau It-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significa nce- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 36 U.S. EPA(April 2011)AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf 37"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf 38 CAPCOA(July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_H RA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 17 approximately 799 pounds of DPM over the 735-day construction period.39 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources.To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: grams 799.2 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate ( ) = x x x = 0.00571 g/s second 735 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00571 grams per second ("g/s"). Subtracting the 735-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project's operational DPM for an additional 28 years, approximately.The IS/MND's operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 86 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation.Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate,we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation: grams 85.8 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate ( ) = x x x = 0.00123 g/s second 365 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00123 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 5.2-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of approximately 205- by 103-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures,the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.40 The IS/MND indicates that the nearest sensitive receptors are residences 50 feet, or 15 meters, away from the project site (p.4-47,Table 4.13-4). However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that the maximally exposed individual resident("MEIR") is located approximately 100 meters from the Project site. Thus,the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 9.101 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.9101 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation,the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 1.967 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour 'See Attachment B for calculations. 4°"Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." EPA, 1992,available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf;see also"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p.4-36. 18 concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.1967 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA. Consistent with the 735-day construction schedule included in the Project's CalEEMod output files,the annualized average concentration for Project construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy(0.25 years) and the first 1.76 years of the infantile stage of life (0—2 years); and the annualized averaged concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period,which makes up the remaining and the 0.24 years of the infantile stage of life (0—2 years),the entire child stage of life, and the entire adult stage of life (16—30 years). Consistent with OEHHA guidance and recommended by the SCAQMD, BAAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors ("ASF")to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.41,42,43 According to this guidance,the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant), as well as multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2—16 years). We also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older OEHHA guidance from 2003.This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by SCAQMD,the air quality district with jurisdiction over the City, and several other air districts in the state. Furthermore, in accordance with the guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants.44 Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home ("FAH") Value of 1 for the 3rd trimester and infant receptors.45 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days.The results of our calculations are shown below. 41"Draft Environmental Impact Report(IS/MND)for the Proposed The Exchange(SCH No.2018071058)."SCAQMD, March 2019,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/comment- letters/2019/march/RVC190115-03.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p.4. 42"California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines." BAAQMD, May 2017,available at: http://www.baagmd.gov/'/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa guidelines may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 56;see also"Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards." BAAQMD, May 2011, available at:http://www.baagmd.gov/"/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20Modeling %20Approach.ashx, p.65,86. 43"Update to District's Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA's Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document."SJVAPCD, May 2015,available at:https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf, p.8, 20,24. 44"Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act,"July 2018,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab2588supplementalguidelines.pdf, p. 16. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 45"Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1,and 212."SCAQMD,August 2017,available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/defau It-source/rule-book/Proposed- Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf, p.7. 19 The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Emissions Duration Concentration Breathing Cancer Risk Cancer Risk Age Group ASF Source (years) (ug/m3) Rate(L/kg-day) (without ASFs*) (with ASFs*) 3rd Construction 0.25 0.9101 361 1.24E-06 10 1.24E-05 Trimester Construction 1.76 0.9101 Operation 0.24 0.1967 luyc, Infant Total 2 2.71E-05 10 2.71E-04 (Age 0-2) Child Operation 14 0.1967 572 2.37E-05 3 7.12E-05 (Age 2-16) Adult Operation 14 0.1967 261 7.91E-06 1 7.91E-06 (Age 16-30) Lifetime 30 6.00E-05 3.63E-04 *We,along with CARB and SCAQMD,recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance,which includes ASFs. As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing ASFs, is approximately 12.4, 271, 71.2, and 7.91 in one million, respectively.The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), utilizing ASFs, is approximately 363 in one million.The 3rd trimester, infant, child, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the IS/MND. Utilizing ASFs is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and reflects recommendations from the air district. Results without ASFs are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation,without ASFs, are approximately 1.24, 27.1, 23.7, and 7.91 in one million, respectively.The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years),without ASFs, is approximately 60 in one million. While we recommend the use of ASFs,the Project's infant, child, and lifetime cancer risks without ASFs, as estimated by SWAPE, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million regardless, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the IS/MND. An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project's air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection.46 The purpose of the screening-level 46"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at:https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 1-5 20 construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project's emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used.Therefore, our screening-level HRA indicates a potentially significant impact,the City should prepare an EIR analysis with an HRA which makes a reasonable effort to connect the Project's air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors.Thus,the City should prepare an updated, quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation. Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts The IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,668 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year("MT CO2e/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year(p. 4-31,Table 4.8-1). Table 4.8-1. Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Category Annual GHG Emissions(MTCC2e per year) Amortized Construction Emissions(Direct) 108.7 Area Source Emissions (Direct) 4.5 Energy Source Emissions (Indirect) 597.6 Mobile Source Emissions(Direct) 1,794.0 Solid Waste Disposal Emissions(Indirect) 62.2 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment(Indirect) 101.0 Total Annual GHG Emissions 2,668.0 Threshold 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No Source: TAHA 2021 Furthermore,the IS/MND relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS,the San Bernardino Regional GHG Reduction Plan, and the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan ("CAP") in order to conclude that the Project would result in a less-than-significant GHG impact(p. 4-31—4-32). However,the IS/MND's GHG analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for five reasons: (1) The IS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model; (2) The IS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) SWAPE's updated analysis indicates a potentially significant GHG impact; (4) The IS/MND fails to consider the performance-based standards under CARB's Scoping Plan; and (5) The IS/MND fails to consider the performance-based standards under SCAG's RTP/SCS. 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,668 MT CO2e/year (p.4-31,Table 4.8-1). However,the IS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis is 21 unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the AQAssessment and GHG Assessment as Appendix A and Appendix F to the IS/MND, respectively, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND.As a result, the model underestimates the Project's emissions, and the IS/MND's quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the surrounding environment. 2) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated, IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,668 MT CO2e/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (p.4-31,Table 4.8-1). However,the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2/year threshold, the SCAQMD's 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as "AB 32", was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.47 Furthermore,AEP guidance states: "[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone."48 As it is currently September 2021,thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the IS/MND's less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.49 3) Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant GHG Impact SWAPE's updated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact,when applying the outdated SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year.The updated CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE with Project-specific information, disclose the Project's mitigated emissions,which include approximately 150 MT CO2e of total construction emissions (sum of 2022, 2023, and 2024) and approximately 3,824 MT CO2e/year of net annual operational emissions (sum of area-, energy-, mobile-, waste-, and water-related emissions). When amortizing the Project's construction-related GHG 4'HEALTH &SAFETY CODE 38550,available at: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes displaySection.xhtml?IawCode=HSC§ionNum=38550. 48"Beyond Newhall and 2020:A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California."Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP),October 2016,available at: https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016 Final White Paper.pdf, p. 39. 49"Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group#15."SCAQMD,September 2010,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 22 emissions over a period of 30 years and summing them with the Project's operational GHG emissions, we estimate net annual GHG emissions of approximately 3,975 MT CO2e/year(see table below). SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Construction (amortized over 30 years) 150.54 Area 67.31 Energy 785.56 Mobile 2,546.48 Waste 293.70 Water 131.08 Total Annual Operational 3,824.13 Net Annual GHG Emissions 3,974.67 Threshold 3,000 Exceed? Yes As demonstrated above,the Project's estimated net annual GHG emissions exceed the outdated SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year, thus resulting in a significant impact not previously addressed or mitigated in the IS/MND.As stated above, this threshold is outdated, and we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.50 However, as the IS/MND fails to provide the Project's estimated number of residents and employees, we are unable to compare the Project's emissions to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target. As such, an updated GHG analysis using the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target should be prepared in an EIR and additional mitigation should be incorporated accordingly, per CEQA Guidelines. 4) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan As previously discussed,the IS/MND relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan to determine Project GHG significance (p.4-31). However,this is incorrect, as the IS/MND fails to consider performance-based measures proposed by CARB. i. Passenger& Light Duty VMT Per Capita Benchmarks per SB 375 In reaching the State's long-term GHG emission reduction goals, CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly cites to SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated under the implementation of Sustainable Community Strategies.51 CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and s°"Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group#15."SCAQMD,September 2010,available at:http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 51"California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan."CARB, November 2017,available at: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping plan 2017.pdf, p.25,98, 101-103. 23 light-duty vehicles at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a "baseline scenario" that includes "current projections of VMT included in the existing Regional Transportation Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State's 18 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) pursuant to SB 375 as of 2015."52 By dividing the projected daily VMT by the population, we calculated the daily VMT per capita for each year at the state and county level for 2010 (baseline year), 2022 (Project operational year), and 2030 (target years under SB 32) (see table below). 2017 Scoping Plan Daily VMT Per Capita San Bernardino County State Year Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita 2010 2,043,484 55,741,307.23 27.28 37,335,085 836,463,980.46 22.40 2024 2,327,528 62,431,182.19 26.82 41,994,283 926,776,780.89 22.07 2030 2,478,888 65,538,854.28 26.44 43,939,250 957,178,153.19 21.78 As the IS/MND fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan performance- based daily VMT per capita projections, the IS/MND's claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan is unsupported.An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts. 5) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards under SCAG's RTP/SCS Here, as discussed above,the IS/MND concludes that the Project would be consistent with SCAG's RTP/SCS(p. 4-32). However, the IS/MND fails to consider whether or not the Project meets any of the specific performance-based goals underlying SCAG's RTP/SCS and SB 375, such as: i) per capita GHG emission targets, or ii) daily vehicles miles traveled ("VMT") per capita benchmarks. i. SB 375 Per Capita GHG Emission Goals SB 375 was signed into law in September 2008 to enhance the state's ability to reach AB 32 goals by directing CARB to develop regional 2020 and 2035 GHG emission reduction targets for passenger vehicles (autos and light-duty trucks). In March 2018, CARB adopted updated regional targets requiring a 19 percent decrease in VMT for the SCAG region by 2035.This goal is reflected in SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report ("PEIR"), in which the 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR updates the per capita emissions to 18.8 lbs/day in 2035 (see excerpt below).s3 52"Supporting Calculations for 2017 Scoping Plan-Identified VMT Reductions," Excel Sheet"Readme."CARB, January 2019,available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019- 01/sp mss vmt calculations ian19 0.xlsx. ss"Connect SoCal Certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report."SCAG, May 2020,available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/fpeir connectsocal complete.pdf?1607981618, p.3.8-74. 24 Table 3.8-10 SB 375 Analysis 2005(Baseline) 2020 IP1an1 2035(Flax) Resident population(per 1,0001 ]7,L,] L9,]94 21,110 CO2 emissions(per 1,O00 tons( 204Ak 2G4.5ke 198.6ibl Per capita emissions(pounds/day) 23,8 21.3 18.8 %difference from Plan(2020)to Baseline(2005) %difference from Plan(2035)to Baseline 00051 _19% ' Note: la Based on EMFAC2O07 lb/Bused ax EMFAC 014 aid SCAG trodderrg,2029_ Id!ntho cs off-maid adjustments for 2035 and 2045 Source_ SCAC modeling,2019. bf tp:ihrwro.xrnc.ra Folromorif fee_JComorif feeDarlibraryl joinIRCPC.i i.0 i75fuela$rydf As the IS/MND fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the SCAG's per capita emissions,the IS/MND's claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with SCAG's RTP/SCS is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts. i. SB 375 RTP/SCS Daily VMT Per Capita Target Under the SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS, daily VMT per capita in the SCAG region should decrease from 23.2 VMT in 2016 to 20.7 VMT by 2045.54 Daily VMT per capita in Los Angeles County should decrease from 22.2 to 19.2 VMT during that same period.55 Here, however,the IS/MND fails to consider any of the above-mentioned performance-based VMT targets. As the IS/MND fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the SCAG's performance-based daily VMT per capita projections,the IS/MND's claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with SCAG's RTP/SCS is unsupported.An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts. Design Features Should Be Included as Mitigation Measures Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant health risk and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. We recommend that the IS/MND implement all PDFs, such as including water and energy efficient mechanical equipment and electric appliances, water efficient landscaping and irrigation systems, and electric vehicle charging stations, as formal mitigation measures. As a result, we could guarantee that these measures would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. Including formal mitigation measures by properly committing to their implementation would result in verifiable emissions reductions that may help reduce emissions to less- than-significant levels. 54"Connect SoCal."SCAG,September 2020,available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdf?1606001176, pp. 138. ss"Connect SoCal."SCAG,September 2020,available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdf?1606001176, pp. 138. 25 Disclaimer SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented.This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. (co, ty,2A Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Attachment A: CalEEMod Output Files Attachment B: Health Risk Calculations Attachment C:AERSCREEN Output Files Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV Attachment E: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV 26 Attachment A CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 7.60 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 4,900.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 300.00 + Space ; 0.00 120,000.00 + 0 Parking Lot 226.00 + Space ; 1.80 90,400.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,374.80 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.07 3,000.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 259,000.00 + 741 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 4 r f I. Strip Mall 3.34 1000sgft 0.00 3,339.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect CO2 Intensity Factor" Land Use- See SWAPE comments on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Parking" and "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Land Us Enclosed Parking= 57% of total, Parking Lot=43% of total parking. CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Construction Phase- Consistent with IS/MND's model Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Woodstoves-Woodstoves: consistent with IS/MND's model. Fireplaces: See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values" Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Solid Waste-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Solid Waste Generation Rates" Total adds up to 584 tons/year Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Construction-related Mitigation Measures" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Energy Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 220.15 259.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 0.85 1.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 25.90 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 0.10 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberWood 12.95 0.00 . 4 I" tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.05 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 60.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 45.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 24.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 12.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 21,180.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 10,590.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,600.00 T 4,900.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 T 1,570.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,340.00 T 3,339.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.70 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.03 T 1.80 tblLandUse LotAcreage 6.82 T 3.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.08 T 0.00 I- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 1.00 4.00 1 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 630 r 4 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 555.83 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 66.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 66.00 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL i 5.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.90 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP 40.20 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblVehicleTrips PBTP 3.00 0.00 • • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 1.05 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 6.65 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 1.89 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 5.81 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 33.82 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 44.32 24.86 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 16,940,046.66 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 177,429.43 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 10,638,519.27 • 10,679,594.63 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 827,895.26 0.00 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 7 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 •i 0.4472 i 3.9343 ; 3.8304 i 9.7000e- ; 0.2963 0.1598 i 0.4562 0.0674 i 0.1548 0.2223 0.0000 i 868.1095 ; 868.1095 i 0.0981 ; 0.0000 i 870.5612 9I I I 003 1 1 I 1 I . I I I I '9 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 e J J J J J J J J . I J J J 2023 •1 0.5684 i 3.9296 ; 5.6253 i 0.0118 ; 0.3179 0.1765 i 0.4944 0.0852 i 0.1749 0.2601 : 0.0000 i 1,036.191 ; 1,036.191 i 0.0775 ; 0.0000 1 1,038.127 9 I I I 1 I I I I . 1 I 1 I I 1 3 '9 1 I I 1 I I I I . I I I I 1 �1 J J J J J J J J . I J J J 2024 •1 1.9424 i 1.2399 ; 1.8664 i 3.9000e- ; 0.1021 0.0512 i 0.1533 0.0274 i 0.0502 0.0776 : 0.0000 i 345.0841 ; 345.0841 i 0.0325 ; 0.0000 1 345.8963 9 I I I 003 1 I I I I . I I I I 1 9 I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 1 Maximum 1.9424 3.9343 5.6253 0.0118 0.3179 0.1765 0.4944 0.0852 0.1749 0.2601 0.0000 1,036.191 1,036.191 0.0981 0.0000 1,038.127 11 1 1 3 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 •1 0.4472 1 3.9343 ; 3.8304 1 9.7000e- 1 0.2963 1 0.1598 1 0.4562 1 0.0674 1 0.1548 0.2223 0.0000 868.1089 1 868.1089 1 0.0981 1 0.0000 i 870.5606 9 I II I I I 003 1 I I . I 1 •� I I I . I I I J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2023 9 0.5684 i 3.9296 ; 5.6253 i 0.0118 1 0.3179 ; 0.1765 i 0.4944 ; 0.0852 i 0.1749 0.2601 . 0.0000 1,036.190; 1,036.190 i 0.0775 ; 0.0000 i 1,038.126 9I I I I I I I I . 3 I 3 I I i 5 9I I I I I I I I . I I I •I J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2024 •1 1.9424 i 1.2399 ; 1.8664 i 3.9000e- 1 0.1021 ; 0.0512 i 0.1533 ; 0.0274 i 0.0502 0.0776 .. 0.0000 345.0839 ; 345.0839 i 0.0325 ; 0.0000 1 345.8960 9 I I I 003 1 I I I I . I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I . I I I Maximum 1.9424 3.9343 5.6253 0.0118 0.3179 0.1765 0.4944 0.0852 0.1749 0.2601 0.0000 1,036.190 1,036.190 0.0981 0.0000 1,038.126 3 3 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) 1 3-5-2022 6-4-2022 1.4079 1.4079 2 6-5-2022 9-4-2022 1.2728 1.2728 3 9-5-2022 12-4-2022 1.3150 1.3150 4 12-5-2022 3-4-2023 1.2210 1.2210 5 3-5-2023 6-4-2023 1.1835 1.1835 6 6-5-2023 9-4-2023 1.0936 1.0936 7 9-5-2023 12-4-2023 1.0817 1.0817 8 12-5-2023 3-4-2024 1.0395 1.0395 9 3-5-2024 6-4-2024 0.9290 0.9290 10 6-5-2024 9-4-2024 1.5127 1.5127 Highest 1.5127 1.5127 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 1.1609 i 0.0849 : 2.7100 i 4.9000e- 1 : 0.0192 i 0.0192 : i 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 i 66.8289 : 66.8289 i 5.4300e- 1 1.1400e- � 67.3059 '� I I 1 I 004 II I I II • I I I 003 I 003i I ; J J J J J J J 4 J J J Energy •1 0.0209 i 0.1788 : 0.0766 i 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 i 0.0145 : i 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 i 782.0369 : 782.0369 i 0.0304 1 9.2700e- 1 785.5608 9 I I : 003 : I I I . I I 1 003 I 91 1 1 1 1 . I 1 ;1 J J J J J J J J V J J J Mobile •1 0.4455 i 3.0770 : 6.0309 i 0.0274 1 2.2695 1 0.0166 i 2.2862 : 0.6082 i 0.0155 0.6237 : 0.0000 i 2,543.694:2,543.694 i 0.1116 1 0.0000 1 2,546.483 9 I I I 1 I I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 4 9I I I I • I I I I ;� J J J J J J J J V I J J J Waste •1 1 1 1 i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 118.5467 i 0.0000 : 118.5467 i 7.0059 1 0.0000 1 293.6945 9 I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I '9 I I 1 I I I I • I I I I 1 ;� J J J J J J J J V I J J J Water •1 1 1 1 i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • 5.9020 i 105.3330 : 111.2350 i 0.6110 1 0.0153 1 131.0754 9 1 I I I I I I I ; I I I I 1 '9 I I I 1 I I I I • I 1 I 1 Total 1.6273 3.3406 8.8175 0.0291 2.2695 0.0503 2.3199 0.6082 0.0492 0.6574 124.4487 3,497.893 3,622.341 7.7644 0.0257 3,824.119 1 8 9 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 1.1609 i 0.0849 : 2.7100 i 4.9000e- 1 : 0.0192 i 0.0192 : i 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 i 66.8289 : 66.8289 i 5.4300e- 1 1.1400e- � 67.3059 '� I I 1 I 004 II I I II , I I I 003 I 003i ; J J J J J J J V J J J Energy •1 0.0209 i 0.1788 : 0.0766 i 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 i 0.0145 : i 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 i 782.0369 : 782.0369 i 0.0304 1 9.2700e- 1 785.5608 9 I I : 003 1 I I I . I : 1 003 I 9 . I 1 �1 J J J J J J J J V J J J Mobile •1 0.4455 i 3.0770 : 6.0309 i 0.0274 1 2.2695 1 0.0166 i 2.2862 : 0.6082 i 0.0155 0.6237 : 0.0000 i 2,543.694:2,543.694 i 0.1116 1 0.0000 1 2,546.483 9 I I I 1 I I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 4 9I I I I . I I I I �� J J J J J J J J V I J J J Waste •1 i i i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 118.5467 i 0.0000 : 118.5467 i 7.0059 1 0.0000 1 293.6945 9 I I I I I I I I . I i I I '9 I I 1 I I I I . I I I I i f J J J J J J J J . I J J J Water •1 i i i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • 5.9020 i 105.3330 : 111.2350 i 0.6110 1 0.0153 1 131.0754 9 1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I 1 I I I I . I i I 1 Total 1.6273 3.3406 8.8175 0.0291 2.2695 0.0503 2.3199 0.6082 0.0492 0.6574 124.4487 3,497.893 3,622.341 7.7644 0.0257 3,824.119 1 8 9 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 :Demolition :Demolition I3/5/2022 :4/1/2022 : 5: 20: I , , + i 1 2 :Site Preparation :Grading 4/30/2022 :5/27/2022 : 51l 20: I + , 1 i i 3 •Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Site Preparation 4/2/2022 :4/15/2022 : 51 10: I + , i , i , 4 :Construction-East Building :Building Construction 6/25/2022 :5/12/2023 : 5: 230: I + , i , i , 5 :Grading :Grading 5/28/2022 :6/24/2022 : 5: 20: I + , i , i , 6 :Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation 4/16/2022 :4/29/2022 : 5: 10: I + , i , i , 7 :Construction-West Building :Building Construction 5/13/2023 :3/29/2024 : 5: 230: I + , i , i , 8 :Paving-East Building :Paving 3/30/2024 :4/26/2024 : 5: 20: I + , 1 i i 9 :Architectural Coatings East Bldg :Architectural Coating 5/25/2024 :6/21/2024 : 51 20: I + , 1 i i 10 :Paving-West Building :Paving 4/27/2024 :5/24/2024 : 51 20: I + I I 11 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:Architectural Coating '6/22/2024 :7/19/2024 5' 20' Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 527,654; Residential Outdoor: 175,885; Non-Residential Indoor: 12,359; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,120; Striped Parking Area: 12,624(Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.00 81: 0.73 -I- Demolition :Excavators ; 1! 8.001 158' 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 2! 4.00I 84' 0.74 Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 2! 8.001 247' 0.40 + i- r Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors 2' 8.00' 212: 0.43 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • Site Preparation •Excavators 0• 8.00• 158• 0.38 Site Preparation Graders ; 1 8.00 187' 0.41 • y i Site Preparation Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Excavators ; 1 8.00 158• 0.38 • J. i Trenching/Utilites-East Building Rubber+ Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 • J. ; Construction-East Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 1 7.001 i 231• 0.29 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. i Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.00 84• 0.74 J. ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.00 100• 0.40 • J. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158• 0.38 • J. i Grading Graders ; 1 8.00 187• 0.41 • J. ; Grading :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Grading :Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 * r Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Excavators 1• 8.00• 158• 0.38 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual • Trenching/Utilities-West Building •Rubber Tired Dozers 0• 8.00• 247• 0.40 Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.001 97' 0.37 • y ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.0O1 78• 0.50 • J. ; Construction-West Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Cranes ; 0 7.00 231' 0.29 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.00 84• 0.74 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100• 0.40 • J. i Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. i Paving-East Building Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 • J. ; Architectural Coatings East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 4 6.00 78• 0.48 • J. i Paving-West Building Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 J. ; Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 4• 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT • Site Preparation 6; 40.00i O.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix !HDT_Mix THHDT I 1 Trenching/Utilites- 6; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Construction 'East i 15: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I Grading 6; 40.001 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT e I 1 i Trenching/Utilities- 6; 40.00. 0.00i 1,440.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT \4/nn+Q..;1,1 n., , I I , I i Construction-West i 14: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.001 40.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT Architectural Coatings y 4; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70; 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Cnc.+Qlrl., , I I , I 1 Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT i r + i * + Architectural Coatings : 4' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \5I,-..+Old, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Off-Road •I 0.0256 1 0.2509 1 0.1776 1 3.5000e- 1 1 0.0122 1 0.0122 1 1 0.0114 : 0.0114 0.0000 1 30.5702 30.5702 1 6.8800e- 1 0.0000 1 30.7422 I •1 I I I 004 I I I I I I I I 003 I 1 •1 I I 1 I I I I I I ; I I I I 1 Total I 0.0256 0.2509 0.1776 3.5000e- 0.0122 0.0122 0.0114 0.0114 0.0000 30.5702 30.5702 6.8800e- 0.0000 30.7422 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I Hauling -1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I MI Vendor 9 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 •• 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 'I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I 1 MI J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 • I 1 1 1 1 II Worker 9 1.7200e- 1 1.2500e- 1 0.0131 1 4.0000e- 1 4.3900e- 1 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- • 0.0000 1 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 1 3.5107 I I I I I' 003 003' 1 005 I 003 1 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 I 005 I II I 1,Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road 4 0.0256 1 0.2509 1 0.1776 1 3.5000e- 1 1 0.0122 1 0.0122 1 1 0.0114 0.0114 � 0.0000 30.5701 1 30.5701 1 6.8800e- 1 0.0000 i 30.7422 I I I 004 I 1 I I I 1 I 003 I I 'I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I Total 0.0256 0.2509 0.1776 3.5000e- 0.0122 0.0122 0.0114 0.0114 0.0000 30.5701 30.5701 6.8800e- 0.0000 30.7422 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.7200e- i 1.2500e- i 0.0131 : 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 3.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.5085 1 3.5085 : 9.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.5107 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 ' I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i 1 i 0.0318 : 0.0000 : 0.0318 i 3.4400e- : 0.0000 : 3.4400e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j •� I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 0.0255 i 0.2967 i 0.1645 : 4.3000e- i 1 0.0117 : 0.0117 i : 0.0108 : 0.0108 •• 0.0000 37.5379 : 37.5379 : 0.0121 i 0.0000 i 37.8414 9 I I I 004 I I I I I • I I I 1 '� 1 I I I 1 I • I I 1 1 Total 0.0255 0.2967 0.1645 4.3000e- 0.0318 0.0117 0.0435 3.4400e- 0.0108 0.0142 0.0000 37.5379 37.5379 0.0121 0.0000 37.8414 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.7200e- i 1.2500e- i 0.0131 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 3.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.5085 1 3.5085 : 9.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.5107 9 003 I 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i 1 i 0.0318 : 0.0000 : 0.0318 i 3.4400e- : 0.0000 : 3.4400e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j •� I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J I J t Off-Road 91 0.0255 i 0.2967 i 0.1645 : 4.3000e- i 1 0.0117 : 0.0117 i : 0.0108 : 0.0108 •• 0.0000 37.5379 : 37.5379 : 0.0121 i 0.0000 i 37.8414 '� 004 I I I I • I I I '� 1 I I I 1 I • I I 1 1 Total 0.0255 0.2967 0.1645 4.3000e- 0.0318 0.0117 0.0435 3.4400e- 0.0108 0.0142 0.0000 37.5379 37.5379 0.0121 0.0000 37.8414 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.7200e- i 1.2500e- i 0.0131 : 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 3.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.5085 1 3.5085 : 9.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.5107 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 ' I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i i 0.0139 : 0.0000 : 0.0139 i 1.5600e- : 0.0000 : 1.5600e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j •� I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road •i 0.0104 i 0.1111 i 0.0766 : 1.5000e- i : 5.5400e- : 5.5400e- i : 5.1000e- 5.1000e- • 0.0000 13.4863 : 13.4863 : 4.3600e- i 0.0000 1 13.5953 •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 1 '9 I 1 1 1 I I I I • I I 1 Total 0.0104 0.1111 0.0766 1.5000e- 0.0139 5.5400e- 0.0195 1.5600e- 5.1000e- 6.6600e- 0.0000 13.4863 13.4863 4.3600e- 0.0000 13.5953 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 8.2500e- i 0.3078 i 0.0524 : 1.0900e- i 0.0248 : 7.7000e- : 0.0256 i 6.8100e- : 7.4000e- 7.5500e- • 0.0000 i 105.4147 1 105.4147 : 5.8500e- i 0.0000 i 105.5610 •9 003 I I I 003 1 I 004 I 1 003 1 004 003 1 I I 003 I 1 91 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J • I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 •I I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I i •I I I I I I 1 I I • I I I I i f J J J J J J J J • I J J J t Worker •i 8.6000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.5400e- : 2.0000e- i 2.1900e- : 1.0000e- : 2.2100e- i 5.8000e- : 1.0000e- 6.0000e- � 0.0000 i 1.7542 1 1.7542 : 5.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7554 9 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 9 I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 005 I 1 Total 9.1100e- 0.3085 0.0589 1.1100e- 0.0270 7.8000e- 0.0278 7.3900e- 7.5000e- 8.1500e- 0.0000 107.1689 107.1689 5.9000e- 0.0000 107.3164 003 003 004 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i 1 i 0.0139 : 0.0000 : 0.0139 i 1.5600e- : 0.0000 : 1.5600e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 •1 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j ,� I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road •i 0.0104 i 0.1111 i 0.0766 : 1.5000e- i : 5.5400e- : 5.5400e- i : 5.1000e- 5.1000e- • 0.0000 13.4863 : 13.4863 : 4.3600e- i 0.0000 1 13.5953 9 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 •003 I I 003 I 1 •1 I 1 I 1 1 I I • I I 1 Total 0.0104 0.1111 0.0766 1.5000e- 0.0139 5.5400e- 0.0195 1.5600e- 5.1000e- 6.6600e- 0.0000 13.4863 13.4863 4.3600e- 0.0000 13.5953 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 8.2500e- i 0.3078 i 0.0524 : 1.0900e- i 0.0248 : 7.7000e- : 0.0256 i 6.8100e- : 7.4000e- 7.5500e- • 0.0000 i 105.4147 1 105.4147 : 5.8500e- i 0.0000 i 105.5610 9 003 I I I 003 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 1 I I 003 I 1 91 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J • I J J J Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000t 0.0000 •I I I I I 1 I I . I 1 I I i•I I I I I I 1 I I • I I I I if J J J J J J J J • I J J J t Worker •i 8.6000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.5400e- : 2.0000e- i 2.1900e- : 1.0000e- : 2.2100e- i 5.8000e- : 1.0000e- 6.0000e- � 0.0000 i 1.7542 1 1.7542 : 5.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7554 9 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 9 I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 005 I 1 Total 9.1100e- 0.3085 0.0589 1.1100e- 0.0270 7.8000e- 0.0278 7.3900e- 7.5000e- 8.1500e- 0.0000 107.1689 107.1689 5.9000e- 0.0000 107.3164 003 003 004 003 004 003 003 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9 0.2658 i 2.1099 i 2.5492 4.3700e- i 0.1106 0.1106 i 0.1092 0.1092 0.0000 i 376.9132 376.9132 0.0415 i 0.0000 i 377.9505 •1'1 I I I 003 I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I Total 0.2658 2.1099 2.5492 4.3700e- 0.1106 0.1106 0.1092 0.1092 0.0000 376.9132 376.9132 0.0415 0.0000 377.9505 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 6.6700e- i 0.2488 i 0.0495 : 7.1000e- i 0.0170 : 3.8000e- : 0.0174 i 4.9100e- : 3.6000e- 5.2800e- i 0.0000 i 68.0115 1 68.0115 : 4.4600e- i 0.0000 i 68.1231 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0581 i 0.0422 i 0.4411 : 1.3100e- i 0.1480 : 9.4000e- : 0.1490 i 0.0393 : 8.6000e- 0.0402 : 0.0000 i 118.4104 1 118.4104 : 3.0800e- i 0.0000 i 118.4875 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 • I I I 003 I I '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0648 0.2910 0.4906 2.0200e- 0.1650 1.3200e- 0.1664 0.0442 1.2200e- 0.0455 0.0000 186.4219 186.4219 7.5400e- 0.0000 186.6105 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9 0.2658 i 2.1099 i 2.5492 : 4.3700e- i : 0.1106 : 0.1106 i : 0.1092 : 0.1092 •. 0.0000 i 376.9128 : 376.9128 : 0.0415 i 0.0000 i 377.9500 9 I I I 003 I I I I I • I I I '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2658 2.1099 2.5492 4.3700e- 0.1106 0.1106 0.1092 0.1092 0.0000 376.9128 376.9128 0.0415 0.0000 377.9500 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 6.6700e- i 0.2488 i 0.0495 ; 7.1000e- i 0.0170 ; 3.8000e- ; 0.0174 i 4.9100e- I 3.6000e- 5.2800e- i 0.0000 i 68.0115 1 68.0115 ; 4.4600e- i 0.0000 i 68.1231 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0581 i 0.0422 i 0.4411 ; 1.3100e- i 0.1480 ; 9.4000e- ; 0.1490 i 0.0393 ; 8.6000e- 0.0402 : 0.0000 i 118.4104 1 118.4104 ; 3.0800e- i 0.0000 i 118.4875 9 I I I 003 I I 004 I I I 004 • I I I 003 I I '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0648 0.2910 0.4906 2.0200e- 0.1650 1.3200e- 0.1664 0.0442 1.2200e- 0.0455 0.0000 186.4219 186.4219 7.5400e- 0.0000 186.6105 003 003 003 003 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road .1 0.1751 i 1.3747 � 1.7892 i 3.0700e- i ; 0.0679 I 0.0679 i i 0.0671 0.0671 � 0.0000 i 265.2390 i 265.2390 ; 0.0282 i 0.0000 i 265.9429 I i I 003 I I i I I • i i i 1 '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.1751 1.3747 1.7892 3.0700e- 0.0679 0.0679 0.0671 0.0671 0.0000 265.2390 265.2390 0.0282 0.0000 265.9429 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ! 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 3.5400e- i 0.1350 i 0.0301 1 4.9000e- i 0.0120 ; 1.3000e- ; 0.0121 i 3.4600e- I 1.3000e- 3.5800e- i 0.0000 i 46.5437 1 46.5437 ; 2.5200e- i 0.0000 i 46.6068 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0383 i 0.0267 i 0.2846 ; 8.9000e- i 0.1042 ; 6.4000e- ; 0.1048 i 0.0277 ; 5.9000e- 0.0283 : 0.0000 i 80.1971 ; 80.1971 ; 1.9400e- i 0.0000 i 80.2457 9 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0418 0.1617 0.3146 1.3800e- 0.1161 7.7000e- 0.1169 0.0311 7.2000e- 0.0318 0.0000 126.7408 126.7408 4.4600e- 0.0000 126.8524 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road .1 0.1751 i 1.3747 � 1.7892 i 3.0700e- i ; 0.0679 I 0.0679 i i 0.0671 0.0671 � 0.0000 i 265.2387 i 265.2387 ; 0.0282 i 0.0000 i 265.9426 I i I 003 I I i I I • i i i 1 '� I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Total 0.1751 1.3747 1.7892 3.0700e- 0.0679 0.0679 0.0671 0.0671 0.0000 265.2387 265.2387 0.0282 0.0000 265.9426 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 ! 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J -1- Vendor 9 3.5400e- i 0.1350 i 0.0301 1 4.9000e- i 0.0120 : 1.3000e- : 0.0121 i 3.4600e- : 1.3000e- 3.5800e- i 0.0000 i 46.5437 1 46.5437 : 2.5200e- i 0.0000 i 46.6068 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0383 i 0.0267 i 0.2846 : 8.9000e- i 0.1042 : 6.4000e- : 0.1048 i 0.0277 : 5.9000e- 0.0283 : 0.0000 i 80.1971 : 80.1971 : 1.9400e- i 0.0000 i 80.2457 9 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0418 0.1617 0.3146 1.3800e- 0.1161 7.7000e- 0.1169 0.0311 7.2000e- 0.0318 0.0000 126.7408 126.7408 4.4600e- 0.0000 126.8524 003 004 004 003 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i i i 0.0239 : 0.0000 : 0.0239 i 2.5800e- i 0.0000 : 2.5800e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j •� I I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J I J t Off-Road 9 0.0255 i 0.2967 i 0.1645 : 4.3000e- i : 0.0117 : 0.0117 i : 0.0108 : 0.0108 •• 0.0000 37.5379 : 37.5379 : 0.0121 i 0.0000 i 37.8414 '� 004 I I I I • I I I '� I I I I 1 I • I I I 1 Total 0.0255 0.2967 0.1645 4.3000e- 0.0239 0.0117 0.0356 2.5800e- 0.0108 0.0133 0.0000 37.5379 37.5379 0.0121 0.0000 37.8414 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.7200e- i 1.2500e- i 0.0131 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 3.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.5085 1 3.5085 : 9.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.5107 9 003 I 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i i 0.0239 : 0.0000 : 0.0239 i 2.5800e- : 0.0000 : 2.5800e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I 003 I 003 ; I I I j •� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J I J t Off-Road 91 0.0255 i 0.2967 i 0.1645 : 4.3000e- i : 0.0117 : 0.0117 i : 0.0108 : 0.0108 •• 0.0000 37.5379 : 37.5379 : 0.0121 i 0.0000 i 37.8414 '� 004 1 1 I I • I I I '� 1 I 1 1 1 I • I I 1 1 Total 0.0255 0.2967 0.1645 4.3000e- 0.0239 0.0117 0.0356 2.5800e- 0.0108 0.0133 0.0000 37.5379 37.5379 0.0121 0.0000 37.8414 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker .1 1.7200e- i 1.2500e- i 0.0131 : 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 3.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.5085 1 3.5085 : 9.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.5107 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I 1 • I I I Total 1.7200e- 1.2500e- 0.0131 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 3.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.5085 3.5085 9.0000e- 0.0000 3.5107 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i i 6.9600e- i 0.0000 : 6.9600e- : 7.8000e- i 0.0000 : 7.8000e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 •1 I I I I 003 I I 003 I 004 I 004I I ,� I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J I J J . J I J t Off-Road • 0.0104 i 0.1111 i 0.0766 : 1.5000e- i : 5.5400e- : 5.5400e- i : 5.1000e- 5.1000e- • 0.0000 13.4863 : 13.4863 : 4.3600e- i 0.0000 1 13.5953 9 I I I 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 I 003 003 • I 1 003 1 1 I • I I I 1 Total 0.0104 0.1111 0.0766 1.5000e- 6.9600e- 5.5400e- 0.0125 7.8000e- 5.1000e- 5.8800e- 0.0000 13.4863 13.4863 4.3600e- 0.0000 13.5953 004 003 003 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 4.1200e- i 0.1539 i 0.0262 : 5.5000e- i 0.0124 : 3.9000e- : 0.0128 i 3.4000e- : 3.7000e- 3.7700e- • 0.0000 i 52.7073 1 52.7073 : 2.9300e- i 0.0000 i 52.7805 '9 003 I I I 004 I 1 004 1 1 003 1 004 003 ' I I 003 I 1 '� 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I i ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 1 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 91 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I i �� J 1 J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker .1 8.6000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.5400e- : 2.0000e- i 2.1900e- : 1.0000e- : 2.2100e- i 5.8000e- : 1.0000e- 6.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7542 1 1.7542 : 5.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7554 9 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 '� i i i i i i i I i 005 Total 4.9800e- 0.1546 0.0327 5.7000e- 0.0146 4.0000e- 0.0150 3.9800e- 3.8000e- 4.3700e- 0.0000 54.4616 54.4616 2.9800e- 0.0000 54.5359 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust :i i i i 6.9600e- : 0.0000 : 6.9600e- i 7.8000e- : 0.0000 : 7.8000e- • 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I 003 I I 003 I 004 I 004I I •� I I I I I I • I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road •i 0.0104 i 0.1111 i 0.0766 : 1.5000e- i : 5.5400e- : 5.5400e- i : 5.1000e- 5.1000e- • 0.0000 13.4863 : 13.4863 : 4.3600e- i 0.0000 1 13.5953 9 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 •003 I 1 003 1 1 •1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 • I I 1 Total 0.0104 0.1111 0.0766 1.5000e- 6.9600e- 5.5400e- 0.0125 7.8000e- 5.1000e- 5.8800e- 0.0000 13.4863 13.4863 4.3600e- 0.0000 13.5953 004 003 003 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 4.1200e- i 0.1539 i 0.0262 5.5000e- i 0.0124 3.9000e- : 0.0128 i 3.4000e- : 3.7000e- 3.7700e- • 0.0000 i 52.7073 1 52.7073 : 2.9300e- i 0.0000 i 52.7805 9004 I I 004 I I 003 I 004 003 ' I I 003 I 1 003 I I ,� J J J J J J J • 7 J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 1 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 91 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker .1 8.6000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.5400e- 2.0000e- i 2.1900e- 1.0000e- : 2.2100e- i 5.8000e- : 1.0000e- 6.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7542 1 1.7542 : 5.0000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7554 9 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 '� i i i i I i i i I i 005 Total 4.9800e- 0.1546 0.0327 5.7000e- 0.0146 4.0000e- 0.0150 3.9800e- 3.8000e- 4.3700e- 0.0000 54.4616 54.4616 2.9800e- 0.0000 54.5359 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 4 0.2788 i 2.1123 i 2.9751 : 4.9200e- i : 0.1065 : 0.1065 i : 0.1059 0.1059 •. 0.0000 i 424.0827 : 424.0827 : 0.0371 i 0.0000 i 425.0093 '� I I I 003 I I I I I • I I I '1 I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.2788 2.1123 2.9751 4.9200e- 0.1065 0.1065 0.1059 0.1059 0.0000 424.0827 424.0827 0.0371 0.0000 425.0093 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 6.1500e- i 0.2344 i 0.0522 ; 8.4000e- i 0.0208 ; 2.3000e- ; 0.0210 i 6.0000e- ; 2.2000e- 6.2200e- i 0.0000 i 80.8390 1 80.8390 ; 4.3800e- i 0.0000 i 80.9486 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0665 i 0.0465 i 0.4942 ; 1.5400e- i 0.1809 ; 1.1100e- ; 0.1820 i 0.0481 ; 1.0300e- 0.0491 : 0.0000 i 139.2896 1 139.2896 ; 3.3800e- i 0.0000 i 139.3740 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 • I I I 003 I I '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I 1 Total 0.0727 0.2809 0.5464 2.3800e- 0.2017 1.3400e- 0.2031 0.0541 1.2500e- 0.0553 0.0000 220.1287 220.1287 7.7600e- 0.0000 220.3227 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 0.2788 i 2.1123 I 2.9751 i 4.9200e- i ; 0.1065 I 0.1065 ; i 0.1059 0.1059 •. 0.0000 i 424.0822 i 424.0822 ; 0.0371 i 0.0000 i 425.0088 '� I I I 003 I I I I I • I I '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I 1 Total 0.2788 2.1123 2.9751 4.9200e- 0.1065 0.1065 0.1059 0.1059 0.0000 424.0822 424.0822 0.0371 0.0000 425.0088 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 6.1500e- i 0.2344 i 0.0522 : 8.4000e- i 0.0208 : 2.3000e- : 0.0210 i 6.0000e- : 2.2000e- 6.2200e- i 0.0000 i 80.8390 1 80.8390 : 4.3800e- i 0.0000 i 80.9486 9 003 004 004 003 004 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0665 i 0.0465 i 0.4942 : 1.5400e- i 0.1809 : 1.1100e- : 0.1820 i 0.0481 : 1.0300e- 0.0491 : 0.0000 i 139.2896 1 139.2896 : 3.3800e- i 0.0000 i 139.3740 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 • I I I 003 I I '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I 1 Total 0.0727 0.2809 0.5464 2.3800e- 0.2017 1.3400e- 0.2031 0.0541 1.2500e- 0.0553 0.0000 220.1287 220.1287 7.7600e- 0.0000 220.3227 003 003 003 003 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9 0.1035 i 0.7813 i 1.1713 : 1.9400e- i : 0.0363 1 0.0363 i : 0.0361 : 0.0361 •. 0.0000 i 167.0589 : 167.0589 : 0.0141 i 0.0000 i 167.4110 '� I I I 003 I I I I I • I I '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I i Total 0.1035 0.7813 1.1713 1.9400e- 0.0363 0.0363 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 167.0589 167.0589 0.0141 0.0000 167.4110 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 9I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •i 2.3900e- i 0.0928 i 0.0198 : 3.3000e- i 8.2000e- 9.0000e- : 8.2900e- i 2.3700e- : 9.0000e- 2.4500e- i 0.0000 i 31.8102 : 31.8102 : 1.7300e- i 0.0000 i 31.8533 9 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0247 i 0.0166 i 0.1812 : 5.9000e- i 0.0713 4.3000e- : 0.0717 i 0.0189 : 4.0000e- 0.0193 : 0.0000 i 53.0917 1 53.0917 : 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 53.1221 9 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0271 0.1094 0.2010 9.2000e- 0.0795 5.2000e- 0.0800 0.0213 4.9000e- 0.0218 0.0000 84.9019 84.9019 2.9400e- 0.0000 84.9754 004 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9 0.1035 i 0.7813 i 1.1713 i 1.9400e- i : 0.0363 i 0.0363 : i 0.0361 : 0.0361 •. 0.0000 i 167.0587 1 167.0587 1 0.0141 i 0.0000 i 167.4108 '� I I I 003 I I I I I • I I I I I '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I Total 0.1035 0.7813 1.1713 1.9400e- 0.0363 0.0363 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 167.0587 167.0587 0.0141 0.0000 167.4108 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •i 2.3900e- i 0.0928 i 0.0198 : 3.3000e- i 8.2000e- 9.0000e- : 8.2900e- i 2.3700e- : 9.0000e- 2.4500e- i 0.0000 i 31.8102 : 31.8102 : 1.7300e- i 0.0000 i 31.8533 9 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 I 003 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.0247 i 0.0166 i 0.1812 : 5.9000e- i 0.0713 4.3000e- : 0.0717 i 0.0189 : 4.0000e- 0.0193 : 0.0000 i 53.0917 1 53.0917 : 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 53.1221 9 I I I 004 I I 004 I I I 004 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.0271 0.1094 0.2010 9.2000e- 0.0795 5.2000e- 0.0800 0.0213 4.9000e- 0.0218 0.0000 84.9019 84.9019 2.9400e- 0.0000 84.9754 004 004 004 003 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 9.8800e- i 0.0953 i 0.1463 : 2.3000e- i : 4.6900e- : 4.6900e- i : 4.3100e- 4.3100e- • 0.0000 i 20.0265 : 20.0265 : 6.4800e- i 0.0000 i 20.1885 9003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 •003 ' I I 003 I 1 ;� I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J I J J m J J J t Paving 9 2.3600e- i i i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 003 I i I i I i i i • I i I i 9I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0122 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 4.3100e- 4.3100e- 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 0.0000 20.1885 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 1 '� 1 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 1 I ,� J J J J J J 7 J J J t Vendor •i 7.4000e- i 0.0286 i 6.0900e- 1.0000e- i 2.5200e- : 3.0000e- : 2.5500e- i 7.3000e- : 3.0000e- 7.5000e- i 0.0000 i 9.7878 1 9.7878 : 5.3000e- i 0.0000 i 9.8010 '� 004 003 004 003 005 003 004 005 004 I 004 1 1 '� I 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker •i 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 1 005 1 003 1 003 1 005 003 I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 2.2600e- 0.0296 0.0172 1.4000e- 6.9100e- 6.0000e- 6.9600e- 1.8900e- 5.0000e- 1.9400e- 0.0000 13.0549 13.0549 6.0000e- 0.0000 13.0701 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 9.8800e- i 0.0953 ; 0.1463 i 2.3000e- i i 4.6900e- i 4.6900e- i ; 4.3100e- 4.3100e- • 0.0000 20.0265 i 20.0265 ; 6.4800e- i 0.0000 i 20.1884 •1 003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 003 . I I 003 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 'l J J 1 J J J J J m J J J 1.Paving 9 2.3600e- i 1 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 9 003 I I I i I i I I • I I i i Total 0.0122 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 4.3100e- 4.3100e- 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 0.0000 20.1884 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 1 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 91 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor .1 7.4000e- i 0.0286 i 6.0900e- 1.0000e- i 2.5200e- : 3.0000e- : 2.5500e- i 7.3000e- : 3.0000e- 7.5000e- i 0.0000 i 9.7878 1 9.7878 : 5.3000e- i 0.0000 i 9.8010 '� 004 003 004 003 005 003 004 005 004 I 004 1 1 '� I 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker .1 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 1 005 1 003 1 003 1 005 003 ' I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 2.2600e- 0.0296 0.0172 1.4000e- 6.9100e- 6.0000e- 6.9600e- 1.8900e- 5.0000e- 1.9400e- 0.0000 13.0549 13.0549 6.0000e- 0.0000 13.0701 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating :i 0.8827 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 •� I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 J J J J J I J J . J I J t Off-Road • 7.2300e- i 0.0488 i 0.0724 : 1.2000e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- • 0.0000 10.2130 : 10.2130 : 5.8000e- i 0.0000 1 10.2274 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 004 i '1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 0.8899 0.0488 0.0724 1.2000e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 0.0000 10.2130 10.2130 5.8000e- 0.0000 10.2274 004 003 003 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 9I I I I I I . I I I 1 ,�1 J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 9 I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 : 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 ' I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I 1 • I I I Total 1.5200e- 1.0200e- 0.0112 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 2.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.2672 3.2672 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.2691 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating 4 0.8827 i i 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •. 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 91 I I I I I I I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I I I I 1 I J J J J J I J J . J I J t Off-Road •i 7.2300e- i 0.0488 i 0.0724 i 1.2000e- i i 2.4400e- i 2.4400e- : i 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- • 0.0000 10.2130 1 10.2130 : 5.8000e- i 0.0000 1 10.2274 •1 003 I I I 004 I 1 003 1 003 1 I 003 003 . I I 004 I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 0.8899 0.0488 0.0724 1.2000e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 0.0000 10.2130 10.2130 5.8000e- 0.0000 10.2274 004 003 003 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J 1 J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker •i 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.5200e- 1.0200e- 0.0112 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 2.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.2672 3.2672 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.2691 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road •i 9.8800e- i 0.0953 i 0.1463 : 2.3000e- i : 4.6900e- : 4.6900e- i : 4.3100e- 4.3100e- • 0.0000 i 20.0265 : 20.0265 : 6.4800e- i 0.0000 i 20.1885 9003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 .003 ' I I 003 I 1 ; I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J I J J m J J J t Paving 9 2.3600e- i i i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 003 I i I i I i i i • I i I i 9I I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 0.0122 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 4.3100e- 4.3100e- 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 0.0000 20.1885 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 1 91 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •i 7.4000e- i 0.0286 i 6.0900e- 1.0000e- i 2.5200e- : 3.0000e- : 2.5500e- i 7.3000e- : 3.0000e- 7.5000e- i 0.0000 i 9.7878 1 9.7878 : 5.3000e- i 0.0000 i 9.8010 '� 004 003 004 003 005 003 004 005 004 I 004 1 1 '� I 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker •i 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 1 005 1 003 1 003 1 005 003 I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 2.2600e- 0.0296 0.0172 1.4000e- 6.9100e- 6.0000e- 6.9600e- 1.8900e- 5.0000e- 1.9400e- 0.0000 13.0549 13.0549 6.0000e- 0.0000 13.0701 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9 9.8800e- i 0.0953 i 0.1463 ; 2.3000e- i ; 4.6900e- i 4.6900e- i ; 4.3100e- : 4.3100e- • 0.0000 i 20.0265 i 20.0265 ; 6.4800e- i 0.0000 i 20.1884 9003 I I I 004 I I 003 I 003 I I 003 .003 ' I I 003 I 1 ; I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 J 'l 1 J J J J J J J J J J 1.I I Paving 9 2.3600e- i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; i 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 003 I i I i I i i i • i i I i 9I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 0.0122 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 4.3100e- 4.3100e- 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 0.0000 20.1884 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 1 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 91 I I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I ,� J J J J J J 7 J J J t Vendor .1 7.4000e- i 0.0286 i 6.0900e- 1.0000e- i 2.5200e- : 3.0000e- : 2.5500e- i 7.3000e- : 3.0000e- 7.5000e- i 0.0000 i 9.7878 1 9.7878 : 5.3000e- i 0.0000 i 9.8010 '� 004 003 004 003 005 003 004 005 004 I 004 1 1 '� I 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker .1 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 1 005 1 003 1 003 1 005 003 I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 2.2600e- 0.0296 0.0172 1.4000e- 6.9100e- 6.0000e- 6.9600e- 1.8900e- 5.0000e- 1.9400e- 0.0000 13.0549 13.0549 6.0000e- 0.0000 13.0701 003 004 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating :i 0.8827 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 •� I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 J J J J J I J J . J I J t Off-Road • 7.2300e- i 0.0488 i 0.0724 : 1.2000e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- • 0.0000 10.2130 : 10.2130 : 5.8000e- i 0.0000 1 10.2274 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 004 i '1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 0.8899 0.0488 0.0724 1.2000e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 0.0000 10.2130 10.2130 5.8000e- 0.0000 10.2274 004 003 003 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 9 I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 9 I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker .1 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 : 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- : 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 I I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 ' I I 005 I 1 '� I I I I I 1 • I I I Total 1.5200e- 1.0200e- 0.0112 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 2.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.2672 3.2672 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.2691 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit.Coating 9 0.8827 i i 1 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I 1 •� I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 J J J J J I J J . J I J t Off-Road • 7.2300e- i 0.0488 i 0.0724 : 1.2000e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- i : 2.4400e- : 2.4400e- • 0.0000 10.2130 : 10.2130 : 5.8000e- i 0.0000 1 10.2274 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 004 i '1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 0.8899 0.0488 0.0724 1.2000e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 2.4400e- 0.0000 10.2130 10.2130 5.8000e- 0.0000 10.2274 004 003 003 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 9 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 9 I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J 1 J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 9 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 9 I I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •i 1.5200e- i 1.0200e- i 0.0112 4.0000e- i 4.3900e- 3.0000e- : 4.4100e- i 1.1600e- : 2.0000e- 1.1900e- i 0.0000 i 3.2672 1 3.2672 : 7.0000e- i 0.0000 i 3.2691 9 003 I 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 1.5200e- 1.0200e- 0.0112 4.0000e- 4.3900e- 3.0000e- 4.4100e- 1.1600e- 2.0000e- 1.1900e- 0.0000 3.2672 3.2672 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.2691 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 4 0.4455 i 3.0770 : 6.0309 : 0.0274 i 2.2695 i 0.0166 i 2.2862 i 0.6082 i 0.0155 0.6237 : 0.0000 i 2,543.694 i 2,543.694: 0.1116 i 0.0000 i 2,546.483 '� I I I I I I I I I 3 3 I I 4 '� I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. } 1. 1. r e } 1. r Unmitigated • 0.4455 • 3.0770 • 6.0309 • 0.0274 • 2.2695 • 0.0166 • 2.2862 • 0.6082 • 0.0155 • 0.6237 • 0.0000 2,543.694•2,543.694• 0.1116 • 0.0000 •2,546.483 3 3 4 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2 1,419.32 ; 1,419.32 1419.32 5,631,294 5,631,294 City Park ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 T Y Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall ; 83.03 ; 83.03 83.03 • 329,439 • 329,439 Total I 1,502.35 I 1,502.35 1,502.35 I 5,960,733 I 5,960,733 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 43 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.90 10.90 1 10.90 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.90 • 10.90 10.90 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 i 0.014289 i 0.004794 i 0.018611 i 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 i 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 vI I I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I Electricity •1 I 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 0.0000 1 575.0523 1 575.0523 1 0.0265 1 5.4800e- i 577.3461 Mitigated .: I I I I I I I I . I I I I 003 1 .1 1 I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 J J J J J J J J •• J J J I I 1 I •1 I I I 1 I I Electricity 9 I 1 1 1 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 575.0523 1 575.0523 1 0.0265 1 5.4800e- : 577.3461 Unmitigated .: I I I I I I I I . I I I 003 1 .1 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 J •J J J J J J J •• J J J I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I NaturalGas 9 0.0209 1 0.1788 1 0.0766 1 1.1400e- 1 1 0.0145 1 0.0145 1 1 0.0145 0.0145 : 0.0000 1 206.9847 1 206.9847 1 3.9700e- 1 3.7900e- : 208.2147 Mitigated ;i I I I 003 I I I I I • I I I 003 I 003 1 1 I I I I I I I ' 1 I 1 1 I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.0209 • 0.1788 • 0.0766 • 1.1400e- • • 0.0145 • 0.0145 • • 0.0145 • 0.0145 • 0.0000 • 206.9847 • 206.9847 • 3.9700e- • 3.7900e- • 208.2147 Unmitigated 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr I ---1"--- MT/yr Apartments Mid i 3.83167e•i 0.0207 I 0.1766 1 0.0751 1� 1.1300e- 1� 1 0.0143 I 0.0143 1� 1 0.0143 0.0143 : 0.0000 I 204.4723 1 204.4723 1 3.9200e- 1 3.7500e- 1 205.6874 Rise I +006 •1 I I I 003 I I I I I . I I I 003 I 003 1 1 ; I I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 71 I T City Park 1 0 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 1 I I I I I • I I I 1 I. ; I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 Condo/Townhous 122663.5 1.2000e- 11.0400e- 1 4.4000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 8.0000e- 1 8.0000e- 1 1 8.0000e- ; 8.0000e- a 0.0000 i 1.2094 1 1.2094 1 2.0000e- 1• 2.0000e- 1 1.2166 e 1 • 1 1 1 004 003 004 005I 005 I 005 I005 005 . 1 1 005005 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 , I 1 1 1 Enclosed Parking 1 0 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 with Elevator 1 ; I I I I I I I 1 . I I I 1 I. ; 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 General Office I 17003 9.0000e- 18.3000e- 1 7.0000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 1 6.0000e- 1 6.0000e- 1 1 6.0000e- ; 6.0000e- 1 0.0000 i 0.9073 1 0.9073 1 2.0000e- 1• 2.0000e- 1 0.9127 Building I i 1 1 005 004 004005I 005 I 005 I005 005 . 1 005005 1 1 . I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 : , I 1 1 1 Parking Lot 1 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 1 I I I I I • I I I 1 I. ; I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 Recreational I 0 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1• 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 I. . 1 I I I I I I I . I I I 1 Strip Mall 1 7412.58 4.0000e- 13.6000e- 1 3.1000e- 1 0.0000 1 1 3.0000e- 1 3.0000e- 1 1 3.0000e- ; 3.0000e- 1 0.0000 i 0.3956 1 0.3956 1 1.0000e- 1 1.0000e- 1 0.3979 005 004 004 I I 9 I I 005 I 005 I 005 005 . 1 I 005 005 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Total 0.0209 0.1788 0.0766 1.1500e- 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 206.9846 206.9846 3.9700e- 3.8000e- 208.2147 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr I T MT/yr Apartments Mid i 3.83167e•i 0.0207 1 0.1766 I 0.0751 I I I 1.1300e- I 0.0143 1 0.0143 I 0.0143 0.0143 : 0.0000 I 204.4723 I 204.4723 I 3.9200e- I 3.7500e- 1 205.6874 Rise i +006 '1 I I I 003 I I I I I . I 1 I 003 I 003 1 I I I I I I I I , I I I 71 J J J J J J J J J J J T City Park I 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 1 0.0000 : : 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 I : I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ; I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 r 9 J J J J J J J J v I J J J T Condo/Townhous 1 22663.5 1 1.2000e- 11.0400e- I 4.4000e- I 1.0000e- I I 8.0000e- 18.0000e- I I 8.0000e- ; 8.0000e- a 0.0000 i 1.2094 I 1.2094 1 2.0000e- 12.0000e- 1 1.2166 e 1 • 004 1 003 1 004 1 005 I 005 I 005 I 1 005 005 . 1 I 005 005 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 71 J J J J J J J J I J J J T Enclosed Parking I 0 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 1 0.0000 : : 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator 1 ; I I I I I I I I . 1 I I I 1 1 ; I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I. 71 J J J J J J J J I J J J T General Office 1 17003 9.0000e- 18.3000e- I 7.0000e- I 1.0000e- I I 6.0000e- 16.0000e- I I 6.0000e- ; 6.0000e- 1 0.0000 i 0.9073 I 0.9073 1 2.0000e- I 2.0000e- 1 0.9127 Building 1 I 005 1 004 1 004 005 1 005 I 005 1 005 005 . 1 005 005 1 1 . I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 : , 1 1 1 1 71 J J J J J J J J I J J J T Parking Lot I 0 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 1 0.0000 : : 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 ; I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 r 9 J J J J J J J J v I J J J T Recreational 1 0 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool 1 I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 1 . I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r 71 J J J J J J J J I J J J• T Strip Mall 1 7412.58 1 4.0000e- 13.6000e- I 3.1000e- I 0.0000 I I 3.0000e- I 3.0000e- I I 3.0000e- ; 3.0000e- 1 0.0000 i 0.3956 I 0.3956 1 1.0000e- 11.0000e- 1 0.3979 '1 005 1 004 1 004 1 I I 005 I 005 I 1 005 005 . 1 1 005 005 I I 9 I I I I I I I I , 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.0209 0.1788 0.0766 1.1500e- 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 206.9846 206.9846 3.9700e- 3.8000e- 208.2147 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid i 1.18304e•1 338.0684 i 0.0156 : 3.2200e- : 339.4169 Rise i +006 :: I 003 -9 J J City Park i 0 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 -9 J J -r Condo/Townhous i 5642.06 •1 1.6123 i 7.0000e- : 2.0000e- i 1.6187 e I :1 005 I 005 it J J Enclosed Parking : 703200 .1 200.9487 i 9.2500e- I 1.9100e- : 201.7502 with Elevator I :1 1 003 : 003 41 J J General Office I 46648 .1 13.3303 i 6.1000e- : 1.3000e- : 13.3835 Building i :1 : 004 : 004 i it J J Parking Lot : 31640 •1 9.0416 i 4.2000e- 19.0000e- : 9.0776 :1 : 004 : 005 i it J J Recreational i 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I •1 41 J J Strip Mall : 42171.6 .1 12.0511 i 5.5000e- I 1.1000e- 1 12.0992 :1 004 1 004 Total 575.0523 0.0265 5.4800e- 577.3461 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid i 1.18304e•1 338.0684 i 0.0156 : 3.2200e- : 339.4169 Rise i +006 :: I 003 -9 J J City Park i 0 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 -9 J J -r Condo/Townhous i 5642.06 •1 1.6123 i 7.0000e- : 2.0000e- i 1.6187 e I :1 005 I 005 it J J Enclosed Parking : 703200 .1 200.9487 i 9.2500e- I 1.9100e- : 201.7502 with Elevator I :1 1 003 : 003 41 J J General Office I 46648 .1 13.3303 i 6.1000e- I 1.3000e- : 13.3835 Building i :1 : 004 : 004 i it J J Parking Lot : 31640 •1 9.0416 i 4.2000e- 19.0000e- : 9.0776 :1 : 004 : 005 i it J J Recreational i 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I •: 41 J J Strip Mall : 42171.6 .1 12.0511 i 5.5000e- : 1.1000e- 1 12.0992 :1 004 1 004 Total 575.0523 0.0265 5.4800e- 577.3461 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.1609 � 0.0849 i 2.7100 � 4.9000e- : i 0.0192 i 0.0192 i i 0.0192 � 0.0192 • 0.0000 i 66.8289 : 66.8289 i 5.4300e- : 1.1400e- i 67.3059 •� 004 ; 003 003 'I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 :� } } } } } } } } r } } } Unmitigated • 1.1609 • 0.0849 • 2.7100 • 4.9000e- . • 0.0192 • 0.0192 • 0.0192 • 0.0192 • 0.0000 • 66.8289 • 66.8289 • 5.4300e- • 1.1400e- • 67.3059 004 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0883 i 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating :� ,i I I I I I I 1 I I I I • J .1 J Consumer 9 0.9851 i i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 •• 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Products �� I I I I I I I I , I I '� 1 I I I I I I I i , I I 1 'I I Hearth 9 6.3100e- i 0.0539 : 0.0229 i 3.4000e- i : 4.3600e- i 4.3600e- : i 4.3600e- 4.3600e- • 0.0000 62.4357 : 62.4357 i 1.2000e- : 1.1400e- : 62.8067 •' 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i 'I I I I I I I I I I I I Landscaping 9 0.0812 i 0.0309 : 2.6871 i 1.4000e- i : 0.0149 i 0.0149 : i 0.0149 0.0149 • 0.0000 4.3933 1 4.3933 i 4.2400e- 1 0.0000 I 4.4992 1 ,� I I I 004 I I I I I I I 003 Total 1.1609 0.0849 2.7100 4.8000e- 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 66.8289 66.8289 5.4400e- 1.1400e- 67.3059 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr 1 1 1 1 Architectural •i 0.0883 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 .. 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating :: I I I I I I I I • I I I I e J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Consumer .1 0.9851 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Products :1 I I I I I I • I I I '� J J J J J I I I I I I I J J •• I I �I J 7 J J J Hearth .1 6.3100e- i 0.0539 : 0.0229 i 3.4000e- i : 4.3600e- i 4.3600e- : i 4.3600e- 4.3600e- I 0.0000 i 62.4357 : 62.4357 i 1.2000e- : 1.1400e- i 62.8067 9 003 004 003 003 003 003 9 1 i i i i i i i i 003 003 f J J J J J J J J 4 I J J J Landscaping .1 0.0812 i 0.0309 : 2.6871 i 1.4000e- i : 0.0149 i 0.0149 : i 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 i 4.3933 : 4.3933 i 4.2400e- : 0.0000 � 4.4992 '� 1 1 1 004 1 1 I 1 1 ; 1 1 I 003 i Total 1.1609 0.0849 2.7100 4.8000e- 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 66.8289 66.8289 5.4400e- 1.1400e- 67.3059 004 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •i 111.2350 i 0.6110 i 0.0153 i 131.0754 Unmitigated •• 111.2350 : 0.6110 • 0.0153 : 131.0754 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid I 16.94/ •i 102.3128 1 0.5565 : 0.0140 i 120.3833 Rise I 10.6796 :: I I 91 1 1 J J City Park I 0/ •1 1.2483 1 6.0000e- : 1.0000e- I 1.2533 0.393189:: I 005 I 005 i I- 41J J Condo/Townhous 13.065154/•1 0.3935 1 2.1400e- 15.0000e- I 0.4630 e 0.0410754:1 I 003 I 005 I- 4l J J Enclosed Parking I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 with Elevator I •1 i J J General Office 11.35078/ •1 5.4547 1 0.0443 1 1.0900e- I 6.8848 Building I 0 :: : 003 I- 4 J J Parking Lot I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I- 4l J J Recreational I 0/ •i 0.3453 1 2.0000e- 1 0.0000 I 0.3466 Swimming Pool i 0.108747:i I 005 I i Strip Mall 13.247402/•i 1.4805 1 8.1300e- 1 2.0000e- T 1.7443 I 0.151634:: I 003 I 004 Total 111.2350 0.6111 0.0153 131.0754 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid I 16.94/ •i 102.3128 1 0.5565 : 0.0140 i 120.3833 Rise I 10.6796 :: I I 91 1 1 J City Park I 0/ •i 1.2483 1 6.0000e- : 1.0000e- I 1.2533 0.393189:: I 005 I 005 i I- 41J J Condo/Townhous 13.065154/•i 0.3935 1 2.1400e- I 5.0000e- I 0.4630 e �0.0410754;i 003 005 I- 4l Enclosed Parking I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 with Elevator I •1 i J J General Office 11.35078/ •i 5.4547 1 0.0443 1 1.0900e- I 6.8848 Building I 0 :: I : 003 i t 4 Parking Lot I 0/0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 I- 4l Recreational I 0/ •i 0.3453 1 2.0000e- 1 0.0000 I 0.3466 Swimming Pool i 0.108747;i I 005 I i Strip Mall ID.247402/•i 1.4805 1 8.1300e- 12.0000e- I 1.7443 I 0.151634:: I 003 I 004 Total 11 111.2350 0.6111 0.0153 131.0754 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 118.5467 i 7.0059 0.0000 i 293.6945 Unmitigated •• 118.5467 : 7.0059 • 0.0000 : 293.6945 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid : 555.83 •i 112.8285 1 6.6680 : 0.0000 1279.5278 Rise I •:i .1 i 1 J J City Park : 0.03 •i 6.0900e- 1 3.6000e- 1 0.0000 : 0.0151 ;i 003 I 004 J J Condo/Townhous i 0.46 •i 0.0934 1 5.5200e- 1 0.0000 i 0.2313 e I I 003 J J Enclosed Parking : 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I •: J General Office i 7.07 •i 1.4352 1 0.0848 : 0.0000 i 3.5555 Building i •: t J J Parking Lot : 0 •: 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 J J Recreational i 17.1 •i 3.4712 1 0.2051 1 0.0000 i 8.5996 Swimming Pool I •: J Strip Mall i 3.51 9i 0.7125 1 0.0421 1 0.0000 i 1.7652 Total 118.5467 7.0059 0.0000 293.6945 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons 1 MT/yr • Apartments Mid : 555.83 •i 112.8285 1 6.6680 : 0.0000 1279.5278 Rise i •: 1 t J J City Park : 0.03 •i 6.0900e- 1 3.6000e- 1 0.0000 : 0.0151 .: 003 I 004 J J Condo/Townhous i 0.46 •i 0.0934 1 5.5200e- 1 0.0000 i 0.2313 e I I 003 J J Enclosed Parking : 0 •i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator I •: J J General Office i 7.07 •i 1.4352 1 0.0848 : 0.0000 i 3.5555 Building i •: t J J Parking Lot : 0 •: 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 J J Recreational i 17.1 -el3.4712 1 0.2051 1 0.0000 i 8.5996 Swimming Pool I •: 1 1 J J i .1Strip Mall i 3.51 -el 0.7125 1 0.0421 : 0.0000 i 1.7652 i il 1 Total 118.5467 7.0059 0.0000 293.6945 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number I Hours/Day Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 57 Date: 9/30/2021 10:28 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 7.60 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 4,900.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 300.00 + Space ; 0.00 120,000.00 + 0 Parking Lot 226.00 + Space ; 1.80 90,400.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,374.80 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.07 3,000.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 259,000.00 + 741 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 4 4- f I. Strip Mall 3.34 1000sgft 0.00 3,339.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect CO2 Intensity Factor" Land Use- See SWAPE comments on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Parking" and "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Land Us Enclosed Parking= 57% of total, Parking Lot=43% of total parking. CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Construction Phase- Consistent with IS/MND's model Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Woodstoves-Woodstoves: consistent with IS/MND's model. Fireplaces: See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values" Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Solid Waste-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Solid Waste Generation Rates" Total adds up to 584 tons/year Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Construction-related Mitigation Measures" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Energy Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 220.15 259.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 0.85 1.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 25.90 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 0.10 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberWood 12.95 0.00 . 4 I" tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.05 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 60.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 45.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 24.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 12.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 21,180.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 10,590.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,600.00 T 4,900.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 T 1,570.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,340.00 T 3,339.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.70 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.03 T 1.80 tblLandUse LotAcreage 6.82 T 3.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.08 T 0.00 I- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 1.00 4.00 1 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 630 r 4 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 555.83 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 66.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 66.00 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL i 5.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.90 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP 40.20 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblVehicleTrips PBTP 3.00 0.00 • • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 1.05 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 6.65 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 1.89 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 5.81 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 33.82 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 44.32 24.86 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 16,940,046.66 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 177,429.43 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 10,638,519.27 • 10,679,594.63 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 827,895.26 0.00 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 7 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 •i 4.9826 i 82.5898 ; 46.0429 i 0.2561 ; 8.2717 1.6581 i 9.5368 1.8114 i 1.6363 2.9810 • 0.0000 i 26,896.46;26,896.46 i 2.2163 ; 0.0000 I 26,951.87 '1 I I I I I I I I • 1 •I 1 I I i i . i 57 i 57 i I 40 ;I J J J J J J J J . I J J J 2023 •1 4.6469 i 32.2831 ; 45.2356 i 0.0955 ; 2.4917 1.4464 i 3.9381 0.6666 i 1.4268 2.0935 : 0.0000 i 9,283.061 ;9,283.061 i 0.7593 ; 0.0000 I 9,302.045 9 I I I 1 1 I 1 I • 8 I 8 I I 1 2 9 I I I 1 1 I I I • I I I 1 ;1 J J J J J J J J . I J J J 2024 •1 89.1573 i 27.3471 ; 43.1163 i 0.0898 ; 2.4917 1.1320 i 3.6237 0.6666 i 1.1243 1.7909 • 0.0000 i 8,726.729;8,726.729 i 0.7790 ; 0.0000 I 8,741.208 '1 I I I I I I I I ; I I I 7 I 7 I I 1 4 '1 I 1 I 1 I I I I • I I Maximum 89.1573 82.5898 46.0429 0.2561 8.2717 1.6581 9.5368 1.8114 1.6363 2.9810 0.0000 26,896.46 26,896.46 2.2163 0.0000 26,951.87 11 57 57 40 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 9 4.9826 i 82.5898 i 46.0429 i 0.2561 8.2717 1.6581 i 9.5368 i 1.8114 i 1.6363 2.9810 0.0000 i 26,896.46 i 26,896.46 i 2.2163 i 0.0000 i 26,951.87 •1 I I I I I I I I ■ I 57 : 57 I 1 40 ;� I I I I I I I I I , I I J J J J J J J J I J J J1. 2023 9 4.6469 i 32.2831 ; 45.2356 i 0.0955 1 2.4917 ; 1.4464 i 3.9381 ; 0.6666 i 1.4268 2.0935 • I 0.0000 9,283.061 ;9,283.061 i 0.7593 ; 0.0000 19,302.045 '1 I I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I i 2 '� I I I I I I I I , I I •I J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2024 9 89.1573 i 27.3471 ; 43.1163 i 0.0898 1 2.4917 ; 1.1320 i 3.6237 ; 0.6666 i 1.1243 1.7909 : 0.0000 18,726.729;8,726.729 i 0.7790 ; 0.0000 18,741.208 '1 1 I I I I I I • 7 7 I I 1 4 • I Maximum 89.1573 82.5898 46.0429 0.2561 8.2717 1.6581 9.5368 1.8114 1.6363 2.9810 0.0000 26,896.46 26,896.46 2.2163 0.0000 26,951.87 57 57 40 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 1 23.3317 i 0.0287 1 : 0.4677 0.4677 : i 0.4677 0.4677 • 0.0000 i 5,544.624: 5,544.624 i 0.1429 1 0.1009 1 5,578.277 9 I I I 1 I I I I ; 2 I 2 I 1 i 1 'I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I ■ I I 1 1 ;I J J J J J J J J . I J J J Energy •1 0.1146 i 0.9797 : 0.4196 i 6.2500e- 1 1 0.0792 i 0.0792 : i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.200: 1,250.200 i 0.0240 : 0.0229 I 1,257.629 •1 I I I 003 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 I I I I 1 ■ 1 1 ;� J J J J J J J J J J J Mobile .1 2.8630 i 16.4952 : 37.0284 i 0.1600 1 12.7073 1 0.0913 i 12.7986 : 3.3998 i 0.0851 3.4849 • i 16,342.15: 16,342.15 i 0.6809 1 116,359.17 •1 ; 1 46 : 46 1 I 1 74 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ I Total 10.0134 22.0354 60.7797 0.1949 12.7073 0.6382 13.3455 3.3998 0.6320 4.0318 0.0000 23,136.97 23,136.97 0.8478 0.1239 23,195.08 89 89 40 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day 1 I Area •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 1 23.3317 i 0.0287 0.4677 i 0.4677 i 0.4677 0.4677 • 0.0000 i 5,544.624 5,544.624 i 0.1429 0.1009 i 5,578.277 •1 I I I I I I I I ■ : 2 1 2 I I 1 1 ;� I I I I I I I I , I I ei J J J J J J J J I J J J 1. Energy �i 0.1146 i 0.9797 0.4196 i 6.2500e- 0.0792 i 0.0792 i 0.0792 0.0792 • 1,250.200 1,250.200 i 0.0240 0.0229 i 1,257.629 •1 I I I 003 I I I I I ■ 1 I 1 I I i 4 •� I I I I I I I I I I I J J J J J J J J •• J J J 1. Mobile �1 2.8630 i 16.4952 37.0284 i 0.1600 12.7073 0.0913 i 12.7986 3.3998 i 0.0851 3.4849 • I 16,342.15 16,342.15 i 0.6809 i 16,359.17 I I I I I I I I ■ 46 I 46 I i 74 •� I I I I I I I I . I I I Total 10.0134 22.0354 60.7797 0.1949 12.7073 0.6382 13.3455 3.3998 0.6320 4.0318 0.0000 23,136.97 23,136.97 0.8478 0.1239 23,195.08 89 89 40 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 -Demolition :Demolition 13/5/2022 14/1/2022 1 5: 20: i + I , 1 1 ✓ i -I 2 -Site Preparation :Grading !4/30/2022 :5/27/2022 1 5,� 2- 07 i r i , , , 3 -Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Site Preparation !4/2/2022 :4/15/2022 � 51 1- 01 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 4 -Construction-East Building :Building Construction !6/25/2022 :5/12/2023 1 5� 2307 + I 1 1 5 -Grading :Grading 15/28/2022 :▪6/24/2022 1 51 2- 07 i + , 1 , 1 ✓ i , 6 -Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation !4/16/2022 :4/29/2022 � 51 1- 01 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 7 -Construction-West Building :Building Construction 15/13/2023 :3/29/2024 1 5� 2307 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 8 -Paving-East Building :Paving !3/30/2024 :4/26/2024 51 2- 0: i + ✓ i I , 1 1 , , 9 -Architectural Coatings East Bldg :Architectural Coating 15/25/2024 i6/21/2024 1 i 51 207 + ✓ J4/2712024 15/24/2024 I , 1 1 10 -Paving-West Building :Paving ' 5 I i 11 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:A▪ rchitectural Coating .6/22/2024 .7/19/2024 5. 20: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 527,654; Residential Outdoor: 175,885; Non-Residential Indoor: 12,359; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,120; Striped Parking Area: 12,624(Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.001 81: 0.73 ; Demolition :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 2 4.00i 84' 0.74 y ; Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 2 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00i 212' 0.43 y ; Site Preparation :Excavators ; 0 8.00i 158' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Graders ; 1 8.00i 187' 0.41 y ; Site Preparation :Rollers ; 2 8.00i 80' 0.38 Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.00i 367' 0.48 y ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212: 0.43 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158: 0.38 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00i 78' 0.50 y ; Construction-East Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78: 0.48 Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 1 7.00i 231' 0.29 y ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00i 89' 0.20 1 y _ Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.00i 84' 0.74 y ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.00i 100' 0.40 .1. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.00i 46' 0.45 .1. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00i 212' 0.43 .1. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158: 0.38 * r Grading :Graders 1' 8.00: 187' 0.41 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer • Grading •Rollers 2• 8.00• 80• 0.38 Grading [Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247' 0.40 • y i Grading [Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158• 0.38 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. i Trenching/Utilities-West Building [Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 J. ; Construction-West Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Cranes ; 0 7.00 231' 0.29 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84• 0.74 I J. Construction-West Building [Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100• 0.40 • J. i Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 • J. i Paving-East Building [Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 Architectural Coatings East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 4 6.00 78• 0.48 Paving-West Building [Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 J. ; Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.00 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 4• 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 6; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix !HDT_Mix THHDT I I Trenching/Utilites- 6; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Cnc.+Q..;Irl;n., , I I , I Construction 'East i 15: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I Grading 6; 40.001 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT I I , Trenching/Utilities- 6; 40.00. 0.001 1,440.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT \4/..n+Q.dlrlln., I I , I I Construction-West i 14: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.001 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I , Architectural Coatings y 4; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Cnc.+Qlrl., I I , I I Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT i r + i * + Architectural Coatings : 4' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \l1/..c.+Old, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 4 2.5643 I 25.0937 I 17.7597 I 0.0351 I I 1.2177 I 1.2177 I 1 1.1441 : 1.1441 • 13,369.785 I 3,369.785 I 0.7586 I i 3,388.750 'I I I I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I I 3 .I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I Total I 2.5643 25.0937 17.7597 0.0351 1.2177 1.2177 1.1441 1.1441 3,369.785 3,369.785 0.7586 3,388.750 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Hauling .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Vendor 9 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 'I I I 1 I I I I I , 1 1 I I 1 �I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1898 1 0.1130 1 1.5212 1 4.2400e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 I 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 421.8410 1 421.8410 I 0.0112 1 : 422.1203 '1 I I 003 003 I I I 003 . 1 I I I 1 '1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road •� 2.5643 1 25.0937 1 17.7597 1 0.0351 1 1 1.2177 1 1.2177 1 1 1.1441 1.1441 • 0.0000 3,369.785 1 3,369.785 1 0.7586 1 i 3,388.750 I I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 I I I I 1 I I I , . 1 1 1 I 1 Total 2.5643 25.0937 17.7597 0.0351 1.2177 1.2177 1.1441 1.1441 0.0000 3,369.785 3,369.785 0.7586 3,388.750 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I 1 I I i 9I I I • I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 3.1815 0.0000 3.1815 i 0.3435 0.0000 0.3435 •• i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t '� Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 : 0.0427 i : 1.1687 : 1.1687 i : 1.0752 : 1.0752 • 14,137.845:4,137.845: 1.3383 i 14,171.301 '� I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 3.1815 1.1687 4.3502 0.3435 1.0752 1.4187 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • 1 I I • I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 3.1815 0.0000 3.1815 i 0.3435 0.0000 0.3435 •• i : 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J J J J t Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 0.0427 i 1.1687 1.1687 i 1.0752 1.0752 1 0.0000 i 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 i 1 4,171.301 9 I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 3.1815 1.1687 4.3502 0.3435 1.0752 1.4187 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • 1 I I • I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 2.7847 : 0.0000 1 2.7847 i 0.3111 : 0.0000 ; 0.3111 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 i 22.2277 i 15.3206 0.0307 i 1.1084 1 1.1084 i 1.0197 1 1.0197 • i 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 i i 2,997.257 9 I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I u 8 '� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 2.7847 1.1084 3.8931 0.3111 1.0197 1.3308 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 1.6178 i 60.2492 i 9.8639 0.2212 i 5.0399 0.1540 5.1938 i 1.3817 0.1473 1.5290 • i 23,501.40 1 23,501.40 1.2436 i i 23,532.49 9 I I I : 69 I 69 I I i 59 '� I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.8076 60.3621 11.3851 0.2254 5.4870 0.1568 5.6437 1.5003 0.1499 1.6502 23,923.24 23,923.24 1.2547 23,954.61 79 79 62 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 2.7847 : 0.0000 1 2.7847 i 0.3111 : 0.0000 : 0.3111 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I 1 1 I 1 •� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 i 22.2277 i 15.3206 0.0307 i 1.1084 1 1.1084 i 1.0197 1.0197 • 0.0000 i 2,973.217 2,973.217 1 0.9616 i i 2,997.257 9 I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 2.7847 1.1084 3.8931 0.3111 1.0197 1.3308 0.0000 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 1.6178 i 60.2492 i 9.8639 0.2212 i 5.0399 0.1540 5.1938 i 1.3817 0.1473 1.5290 • i 23,501.40 1 23,501.40 1.2436 i 1 23,532.49 9 i i i i i I I I ; 69 I 69 i I i 59 '� I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I • I I I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker •1 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.8076 60.3621 11.3851 0.2254 5.4870 0.1568 5.6437 1.5003 0.1499 1.6502 23,923.24 23,923.24 1.2547 23,954.61 79 79 62 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 4 3.9372 i 31.2581 i 37.7657 0.0647 i 1.6386 1.6386 i 1.6182 1.6182 • i 6,155.195 6,155.195 0.6776 i i 6,172.134 '1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 3 3 1 '1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Total 3.9372 31.2581 37.7657 0.0647 1.6386 1.6386 1.6182 1.6182 6,155.195 6,155.195 0.6776 6,172.134 3 3 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 9 1 I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0964 i 3.6585 i 0.6711 0.0107 i 0.2562 5.5600e- 0.2617 i 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 i 1,129.230 1,129.230 0.0695 i i 1,130.966 9 003 I : 003 1 3 3 I i 6 '� I 1 . I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.9490 i 0.5648 i 7.6061 0.0212 i 2.2355 0.0139 2.2494 i 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 i 2,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 i :2,110.601 91 I I I 1 8 1 8 1 1 4 9I I I I I I I . I I I 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 3.9372 i 31.2581 i 37.7657 : 0.0647 i : 1.6386 ; 1.6386 i ; 1.6182 1.6182 •. 0.0000 i 6,155.195; 6,155.195; 0.6776 i i 6,172.134 y I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 3.9372 31.2581 37.7657 0.0647 1.6386 1.6386 1.6182 1.6182 0.0000 6,155.195 6,155.195 0.6776 6,172.134 3 3 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '� 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 '� 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0964 i 3.6585 i 0.6711 0.0107 i 0.2562 5.5600e- 0.2617 i 0.0738 5.3100e- 0.0791 i 1,129.230 1,129.230 0.0695 i i 1,130.966 9 003 I : 003 1 3 3 I i 6 '� 1 1 • I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker 9 0.9490 i 0.5648 i 7.6061 0.0212 i 2.2355 0.0139 2.2494 i 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 i 2,109.204 1 2,109.204 0.0559 i :2,110.601 91 I I I • 1 8 1 8 1 1 4 9I I I I I I I I • I I 1 1 Total 1.0454 4.2232 8.2772 0.0319 2.4917 0.0194 2.5112 0.6666 0.0181 0.6847 3,238.435 3,238.435 0.1253 3,241.567 2 2 9 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road .1 3.6862 i 28.9417 i 37.6666 0.0647 i 1.4301 1.4301 i 1.4118 1.4118 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 i i 6,171.618 I I I I 1 I I I • 5 I 5 I I I 2 '� I I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I Total 3.6862 28.9417 37.6666 0.0647 1.4301 1.4301 1.4118 1.4118 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 6,171.618 5 5 2 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 1 I I I I I I 1 9 1 I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0728 i 2.8328 i 0.5848 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,097.877 1,097.877 0.0559 i i 1,099.276 9 003 I : 003 1 9 9 I i 3 '� 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8878 i 0.5086 i 6.9841 0.0204 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 2,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 i :2,031.150 9I I I I I 4 I 4 I I , 7 9I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 3.6862 i 28.9417 I 37.6666 i 0.0647 i i 1.4301 I 1.4301 ; i 1.4118 1.4118 •. 0.0000 i 6,155.283;6,155.283; 0.6534 i i 6,171.618 q I I I I I I I I I 5 I 5 I I I 2 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Total 3.6862 28.9417 37.6666 0.0647 1.4301 1.4301 1.4118 1.4118 0.0000 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 6,171.618 5 5 2 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 1 I I I I I I 1 9 1 I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0728 i 2.8328 i 0.5848 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,097.877 1,097.877 0.0559 i i 1,099.276 9 003 I : 003 1 9 9 I i 3 '� 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8878 i 0.5086 i 6.9841 0.0204 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 2,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 i :2,031.150 9I I I I I 4 I 4 I I 7 9I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 2.3861 0.0000 2.3861 i 0.2577 0.0000 0.2577 i 1 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I I •� I I I I I I I I I I J J J J J J J J m J I J t '� Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 : 0.0427 i : 1.1687 1 1.1687 i : 1.0752 : 1.0752 • i 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i i 4,171.301 9I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I I I I Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.3861 1.1687 3.5548 0.2577 1.0752 1.3328 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 2.3861 i 0.0000 2.3861 0.2577 i 0.0000 0.2577 • i 1 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J J I J t Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 0.0427 1 1.1687 1.1687 i 1.0752 1.0752 1 0.0000 i 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1.3383 i 1 4,171.301 9 I I 1 1 I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I 1 1 I I • I I I I Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.3861 1.1687 3.5548 0.2577 1.0752 1.3328 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9 I I • I I I I 1 9I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I 1 I I i 9I I I . I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I Total 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 421.8410 421.8410 0.0112 422.1203 003 003 003 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 1.3924 : 0.0000 : 1.3924 i 0.1556 : 0.0000 : 0.1556 •• i 1 0.0000 : i 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 i 22.2277 i 15.3206 0.0307 i 1.1084 1.1084 i 1.0197 1.0197 • i 2,973.217 1 2,973.217 0.9616 i i 2,997.257 9 I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 1.3924 1.1084 2.5008 0.1556 1.0197 1.1753 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I Hauling 40.8089 I 30.1246 I 4.9320 0.1106 I 2.5199 0.0770 I 2.5969 I 0.6909 0.0737 0.7645 • 111,750.70 I I I 11,750.70 0.6218 I i 11,766.24 9 I I I .I ' I I I I I I I ' • I 35 I 35 I I 1 80 ,I J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I I I I I I I I I Vendor .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 'I • I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I I I II I I J J J t Worker .1 0.1898 0.1130 1.5212 4.2400e- 0.4471 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 � 421.8410 1421.8410 I 0.0112 I i 422.1203 I' 003 I II 003 I I 003 I I I I' . I I I I I Total 0.9987 30.2376 6.4532 0.1148 2.9671 0.0798 3.0468 0.8094 0.0762 0.8857 • 12,172.54 12,172.54 0.6330 12,188.36 44 44 82 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 Dust •I 1.3924 I 0.0000 I 1.3924 I 0.1556 I 0.0000 : 0.1556 ••; I 0.0000 I I 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I II I I I• 'I J J J J J J m J I J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 22.2277 I 15.3206 I 0.0307 I 1.1084 I 1.1084 I I 1.0197 1.0197 • 0.0000 2,973.217 1 2,973.217 1 0.9616 I i 2,997.257 'I I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I I 8 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 1.3924 1.1084 2.5008 0.1556 1.0197 1.1753 0.0000 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.8089 i 30.1246 i 4.9320 0.1106 i 2.5199 0.0770 2.5969 i 0.6909 0.0737 0.7645 i 11,750.70 1 11,750.70 0.6218 i i 11,766.24 9 I I •� I ' I ' ' I ' • I 35 I 35 I I 1 80 ,� J J J J J J 7 J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I 1 I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.1898 i 0.1130 i 1.5212 4.2400e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 421.8410 1 421.8410 : 0.0112 i i 422.1203 '� 003 003 003 I I I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9987 30.2376 6.4532 0.1148 2.9671 0.0798 3.0468 0.8094 0.0762 0.8857 12,172.54 12,172.54 0.6330 12,188.36 44 44 82 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 3.3787 i 25.6032 i 36.0615 0.0597 1 1.2907 1.2907 i 1.2835 1.2835 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 i i 5,678.697 I I I I 1 1 I I 7 I 7 I I I 8 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.3787 25.6032 36.0615 0.0597 1.2907 1.2907 1.2835 1.2835 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 5,678.697 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 91 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0728 i 2.8328 i 0.5848 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,097.877 1,097.877 0.0559 i i 1,099.276 9 003 I : 003 1 9 9 I i 3 '� 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8878 i 0.5086 i 6.9841 0.0204 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 2,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 i :2,031.150 9I I I I I 4 I 4 I I , 7 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 3.3787 i 25.6032 i 36.0615 : 0.0597 1 : 1.2907 : 1.2907 i : 1.2835 : 1.2835 •• 0.0000 i 5,666.316: 5,666.316: 0.4953 i i 5,678.697 y I I I I 1 1 I I I 7 I 7 I I I 8 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.3787 25.6032 36.0615 0.0597 1.2907 1.2907 1.2835 1.2835 0.0000 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 5,678.697 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 1 I I I I I I 1 9 1 I I I . I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0728 i 2.8328 i 0.5848 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,097.877 1,097.877 0.0559 i i 1,099.276 9 003 I : 003 1 9 9 I i 3 '� 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8878 i 0.5086 i 6.9841 0.0204 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 2,029.900 1 2,029.900 0.0500 i :2,031.150 9I I I I I 4 I 4 I I , 7 9I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9606 3.3414 7.5689 0.0308 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6817 3,127.778 3,127.778 0.1060 3,130.427 3 3 0 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road i.i 3.1851 i 24.0403 i 36.0409 i 0.0597 i 1 1.1159 i 1.1159 i 1.1093 1.1093 • i 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 i i 5,678.122 I I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I 5 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.1851 24.0403 36.0409 0.0597 1.1159 1.1159 1.1093 1.1093 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 5,678.122 2 2 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,096.475 1,096.475 0.0559 i i 1,097.873 9 I 1 1 003 1 I : 003 1 9 9 I i 1 '� I I 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8353 i 0.4609 i 6.5130 0.0197 i 2.2355 0.0134 2.2489 i 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 i 1,964.071 1 1,964.071 0.0457 i i 1,965.212 9I I I I I I 6 I 6 I I 9 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 3.1851 i 24.0403 i 36.0409 : 0.0597 i : 1.1159 : 1.1159 i : 1.1093 : 1.1093 •• 0.0000 i 5,666.182: 5,666.182 : 0.4776 i i 5,678.122 '9 I I I I 1 1 I I 2 I 2 I I 5 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Total 3.1851 24.0403 36.0409 0.0597 1.1159 1.1159 1.1093 1.1093 0.0000 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 5,678.122 2 2 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 9 • 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 ; 0.0104 i 0.2562 ; 2.7300e- ; 0.2589 i 0.0738 ; 2.6100e- 0.0764 . i 1,096.475; 1,096.475; 0.0559 i i 1,097.873 9I 1 1 003 1 I : • 003 1 9 9 i 1 91 • 1 NI V Worker 9 0.8353 i 0.4609 i 6.5130 ; 0.0197 i 2.2355 ; 0.0134 ; 2.2489 i 0.5929 ; 0.0123 0.6052 . i 1,964.071 ; 1,964.071 ; 0.0457 i i 1,965.212 9 • I 6 I 6 I I 1 9 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.9071 3.3068 7.0755 0.0301 2.4917 0.0161 2.5078 0.6666 0.0149 0.6816 3,060.547 3,060.547 0.1015 3,063.086 5 5 0 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 i 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 • 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 9 I I I • 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 1 1 I I I I• '1 - J J 1 1. Paving 9i 0.2358 i 1 1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; i 0.0000 : 0.0000 � i 0.0000 ; i i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 • 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,096.475 1,096.475 0.0559 i i 1,097.873 9 I I I 003 I I I 003 9 I 9 I I i 1 '� I I I I I I • I I I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Worker 9 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 : 3.9400e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 392.8143 : 392.8143 : 9.1300e- i : 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I 1 Total 0.2389 2.9381 1.8651 0.0143 0.7033 5.4100e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.0700e- 0.1974 1,489.290 1,489.290 0.0650 1,490.915 003 003 2 2 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 : 0.0228 i : 0.4685 : 0.4685 i : 0.4310 : 0.4310 •. 0.0000 2,207.547:2,207.547: 0.7140 i 12,225.396 '� 1 1 I I 2 I 2 I I 3 '1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I '1 J J J J J J J J - J J J t Paving 9 0.2358 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 9 • 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 I 0.0104 i 0.2562 1 2.7300e- I 0.2589 I 0.0738 1 2.6100e- 0.0764 . i 1,096.475 11,096.475 I 0.0559 I i 1,097.873 '� I I I I I 003 1 I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 1 '9 I I I I I I I • I I I I ,� J . J Worker 9 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 13.9400e- i 0.4471 12.6800e- I 0.4498 I 0.1186 12.4600e- 0.1210 . i 392.8143 1392.8143 19.1300e- I : 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I Total 0.2389 2.9381 1.8651 0.0143 0.7033 5.4100e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.0700e- 0.1974 1,489.290 1,489.290 0.0650 1,490.915 003 003 2 2 7 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •i 88.2672 1 1 i iI 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 • i i 0.0000 I 1 1 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I • I 1 I 1 9 I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I 1 m J I J 1. 'l Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 I 7.2405 I 0.0119 i I 0.2437 I 0.2437 I I 0.2437 : 0.2437 • i 1,125.792 11,125.792 I 0.0634 I 11,127.377 '� I I I I I I I I • I 2 I 2 I I : 0 '� I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 1 I Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,�1 J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I I I I • I , I I 9I I I I I I . I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 : 3.9400e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 392.8143 1 392.8143 : 9.1300e- i i 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I 1 Total 0.1671 0.0922 1.3026 3.9400e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 392.8143 392.8143 9.1300e- 393.0426 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating 9 88.2672 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 .1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 •� I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 0.0119 i 0.2437 1 0.2437 i 0.2437 0.2437 • 0.0000 i 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 i i 1,127.377 9I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I 0 9 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.0000 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I I •I I I • I 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I , I I 9 • I I I ,� J . J Worker .1 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 : 3.9400e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 . i 392.8143 1 392.8143 : 9.1300e- i i 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I Total 0.1671 0.0922 1.3026 3.9400e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 392.8143 392.8143 9.1300e- 393.0426 003 003 003 003 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 i 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 • 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 9 I I I • 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 1 1 I I I I• '1 - J J 1 1. Paving 9i 0.2358 i 1 1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; i 0.0000 : 0.0000 � i 0.0000 ; 1 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 I I I ; I 1 I I 1 91 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 0.0104 i 0.2562 2.7300e- 0.2589 i 0.0738 2.6100e- 0.0764 i 1,096.475 1,096.475 0.0559 i i 1,097.873 9 J J J J I I ' 003 I9 I I i 1 I I 1� J J J J • 7 I J J J Worker •1 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 3.9400e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 392.8143 : 392.8143 : 9.1300e- i : 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I • I , I I 1 Total 0.2389 2.9381 1.8651 0.0143 0.7033 5.4100e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.0700e- 0.1974 1,489.290 1,489.290 0.0650 1,490.915 003 003 2 2 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 1 0.0228 i ; 0.4685 ; 0.4685 i ; 0.4310 0.4310 •. 0.0000 2,207.547;2,207.547 i 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 9I I I I • I I I 2 I 2 I I 3 � I 1 ' I1I 1 I '1 J J J J J J J J - J J 1 t Paving 9 0.2358 i i i ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• 1 0.0000 ; i I 0.0000 •� I I I I I I I • I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 9 • 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0718 i 2.8460 i 0.5625 I 0.0104 i 0.2562 1 2.7300e- I 0.2589 I 0.0738 1 2.6100e- 0.0764 . i 1,096.475 11,096.475 I 0.0559 I i 1,097.873 '� I I I I I 003 1 I I 003 . 9 I 9 I I I 1 '9 I I I I I I I • I I I I ,� J . J Worker 9 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 13.9400e- i 0.4471 12.6800e- I 0.4498 I 0.1186 12.4600e- 0.1210 . i 392.8143 1392.8143 19.1300e- I : 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I Total 0.2389 2.9381 1.8651 0.0143 0.7033 5.4100e- 0.7087 0.1923 5.0700e- 0.1974 1,489.290 1,489.290 0.0650 1,490.915 003 003 2 2 7 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •i 88.2672 1 1 i i1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 • i i 0.0000 1 1 1 1 0.0000 ;� I I I I I I I • I 1 I 1 q I I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I 1 m J I J 1. '1 Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 I 7.2405 I 0.0119 i I 0.2437 I 0.2437 I I 0.2437 : 0.2437 • i 1,125.792 11,125.792 I 0.0634 I 11,127.377 '� I I I I I I I I • I 2 I 2 I I : 0 '� I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 1 I Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '� I I I I I I • I I I I 1 '� I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,�1 J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I �� J J J J J J J J • 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 : 3.9400e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 392.8143 1 392.8143 : 9.1300e- i i 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I I 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.1671 0.0922 1.3026 3.9400e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 392.8143 392.8143 9.1300e- 393.0426 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating 9 88.2672 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 ;� I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 •� I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 0.0119 i 0.2437 1 0.2437 i 0.2437 0.2437 • 0.0000 i 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 i i 1,127.377 9I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I 0 9I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.0000 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1671 i 0.0922 i 1.3026 3.9400e- i 0.4471 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 392.8143 1 392.8143 1 9.1300e- i i 393.0426 9 I I I 003 I I 003 1 I 1 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1671 0.0922 1.3026 3.9400e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 392.8143 392.8143 9.1300e- 393.0426 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.8630 : 16.4952 1 37.0284 i 0.1600 i 12.7073 : 0.0913 i 12.7986 i 3.3998 i 0.0851 3.4849 : i 16,342.15: 16,342.15: 0.6809 i 1 16,359.17 •� . 46 I 46 I I 1 74 9I I I I I I I I I I I I. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. } 1. 1. r e } 1. r Unmitigated • 2.8630 • 16.4952 • 37.0284 • 0.1600 • 12.7073 • 0.0913 • 12.7986 • 3.3998 • 0.0851 3.4849 • 16,342.15• 16,342.15• 0.6809 • • 16,359.17 46 46 74 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2 1,419.32 ; 1,419.32 1419.32 5,631,294 5,631,294 City Park ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 T Y Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall ; 83.03 ; 83.03 83.03 • 329,439 • 329,439 Total I 1,502.35 I 1,502.35 1,502.35 I 5,960,733 I 5,960,733 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 42 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.90 10.90 1 10.90 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.90 • 10.90 10.90 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 i 0.014289 i 0.004794 i 0.018611 i 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 i 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 vI I I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.1146 0.9797 : 0.4196 : 6.2500e- i i 0.0792 i 0.0792 i i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.200: 1,250.200: 0.0240 � 0.0229 i 1,257.629 Mitigated ;i 003 • i 1 I 1 I I 1 4 I I I I I I:I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.1146 • 0.9797 • 0.4196 • 6.2500e- • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 1,250.200• 1,250.200• 0.0240 • 0.0229 • 1,257.629 Unmitigated 003 1 1 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10497.7 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 62.0919 •1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- I 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- ; 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 004 I 004 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I . I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 46.5836 .1 5.0000e- 1 4.5700e- 3.8400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.5000e- 1 3.5000e- 1 1 3.5000e- ; 3.5000e- • 1 5.4804 I 5.4804 1 1.1000e- 1 1.0000e- i 5.5130 Building i ;' 004 1 003 I 003 1 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 i I I 004 I 004 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I , . I I I 1 I- 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall 120.3084 .1 2.2000e- 1 1.9900e- 1.6700e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.5000e- 1 1.5000e- I 1.5000e- 1.5000e- I 1 2.3892 I 2.3892 1 5.0000e- 1 4.0000e- : 2.4034 1 'I 004 I 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 1 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I , I I I I 005 I 005 Total 0.1146 0.9797 0.4196 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.200 1,250.200 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.629 003 1 1 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10.4977 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . 1 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I 1 -1 J J J J .1 1 J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • 1 I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J 1 I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Condo/Townhous i 0.06209199 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I , I 1 I I 004 I 004 -1 J J J J V I J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Enclosed Parking i 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator I '1 I 1 I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I 1 1 , , 1 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I General Office 10.0465836.1 5.0000e- 1 4.5700e- I 3.8400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.5000e- 1 3.5000e- 1 1 3.5000e- 3.5000e- 1 1 5.4804 I 5.4804 1 1.1000e- 1 1.0000e- i 5.5130 Building i ;: 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 i 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 i 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 . 1 I I I I 1 '1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , • 1 I 1 1 1 ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I Strip Mall i 0.0203084.1 2.2000e- 1 1.9900e- I 1.6700e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.5000e- 1 1.5000e- I 1.5000e- 1.5000e- I 1 2.3892 I 2.3892 1 5.0000e- 1 4.0000e- 1 2.4034 1 '1 004 1 003 I 003 005 1 I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 . 1 I I 005 1 005 1 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I , • 1 I 1 1 1 Total 0.1146 0.9797 0.4196 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.200 1,250.200 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.629 003 1 1 4 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 i 23.3317 : 0.0287 : i 0.4677 i 0.4677 i i 0.4677 � 0.4677 : 0.0000 i 5,544.624: 5,544.624 i 0.1429 : 0.1009 i 5,578.277 9I I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I 1 1 •I I I I I I I I • I I I :1- } } } } } } } } r 1. 1. } Unmitigated • 7.0358 • 4.5605 • 23.3317 • 0.0287 • • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.0000 5,544.624• 5,544.624• 0.1429 • 0.1009 •5,578.277 2 2 1 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.4837 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i I i 0.0000 Coating :: I I •i I I I I I I 1 I • I I 1 • J J Consumer 9 5.3977 i 1 1 1 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i I I 0.0000 Products :: I '� 1 I I I I I I I • I I 1 Hearth 9 0.5047 i 4.3129 : 1.8353 i 0.0275 i : 0.3487 i 0.3487 : i 0.3487 0.3487 • 0.0000 5,505.882: 5,505.882 i 0.1055 : 0.1009 15,538.601 'I I I I I I I I I 4 1 4 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I 1 I • I I 1 •I I J J J I 1 ' Landscaping 9 0.6498 i 0.2475 1 21.4964 i 1.1400e- i 1 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 : I 39.6760 •I I I I 003 I I I I I • I I I I Total 7.0358 4.5605 23.3317 0.0287 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.0000 5,544.624 5,544.624 0.1429 0.1009 5,578.277 2 2 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Architectural •i 0.4837 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • i : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating •': .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I , I 1 I I ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J Consumer •1 5.3977 i 1 i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 . i : 0.0000 i i I 0.0000 Products •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I I '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J Hearth •1 0.5047 i 4.3129 : 1.8353 i 0.0275 i : 0.3487 i 0.3487 : i 0.3487 0.3487 : 0.0000 i 5,505.882: 5,505.882 i 0.1055 1 0.1009 :5,538.601 •1 I I I I I I I I • I 4 I 4 I I : 1 •I I I I I I I 1 I . I I I I . J J J J J J J J I J J J Landscaping .1 0.6498 i 0.2475 : 21.4964 i 1.1400e- i : 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • i 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 1 i 39.6760 •1 I I I 003 I I I I I . I I I 9I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 Total 7.0358 4.5605 23.3317 0.0287 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.0000 5,544.624 5,544.624 0.1429 0.1009 5,578.277 2 2 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:31 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type I Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size I Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 7.60 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 4,900.00 1 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 300.00 + Space ; 0.00 120,000.00 + 0 Parking Lot 226.00 + Space ; 1.80 90,400.00 + 0 City Park 0.33 + Acre ; 0.33 14,374.80 + 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 3.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.07 3,000.00 + 0 Apartments Mid Rise 259.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 3.00 259,000.00 + 741 Condo/Townhouse 1.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 0.00 1,570.00 + 3 4 4- f I. Strip Mall 3.34 1000sgft 0.00 3,339.00 0 • 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2024 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect CO2 Intensity Factor" Land Use- See SWAPE comments on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Parking" and "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Land Us Enclosed Parking= 57% of total, Parking Lot=43% of total parking. CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Construction Phase- Consistent with IS/MND's model Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Off-road Equipment- See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Equipment Horsepower Values" Off-road Equipment- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Trips and VMT- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Woodstoves-Woodstoves: consistent with IS/MND's model. Fireplaces: See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Gas Fireplace Values" Area Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors" Energy Use - Water And Wastewater- Consistent with the IS/MND's model. Solid Waste-See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Solid Waste Generation Rates" Total adds up to 584 tons/year Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Construction-related Mitigation Measures" Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Energy Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures" Table Name I Column Name I Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 220.15 259.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberGas 0.85 1.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 25.90 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 0.10 0.00 . 4 I" 4 tblFireplaces NumberWood 12.95 0.00 . 4 I" tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.05 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 60.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 50.00 T 45.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 24.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 T 12.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 21,180.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 T 10,590.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,600.00 T 4,900.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 T 1,570.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,340.00 T 3,339.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.70 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.03 T 1.80 tblLandUse LotAcreage 6.82 T 3.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 T 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.08 T 0.00 I- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 1.00 4.00 1 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 7 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 2.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 1.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 r 4 • tblProjectCharacteristics CO2lntensityFactor i 702.44 630 r 4 • tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate i 119.14 555.83 v r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 2,648.00 2,880.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber i 1,324.00 1,440.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 0.00 40.00 r • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber i 66.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 66.00 • 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 40.00 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 286.00 200.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 15.00 40.00 r 4 • tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber i 57.00 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CC_TL i 8.40 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CNWTL i 6.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips CWTL i 16.60 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DVTP i 11.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips DV_TP i 40.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TL i 8.70 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP } 40.60 40.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TL i 5.90 10.90 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP } 19.20 20.00 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTL i 14.70 10.90 r • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP i 40.20 40.00 • tblVehicleTrips HWTTP 40.20 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblVehicleTrips PBTP 3.00 0.00 • • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PB_TP i 15.00 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 86.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 45.00 100.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 6.39 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 22.75 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 5.67 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips ST_TR i 2.46 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 9.10 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips STTR i 42.04 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 5.86 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 16.74 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 4.84 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SU_TR i 1.05 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 13.60 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips SUTR i 20.43 24.86 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 6.65 5.48 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 1.89 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 5.81 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 11.03 0.00 r 4 • tblVehicleTrips WDTR i 33.82 0.00 r • tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 44.32 24.86 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 16,874,892.64 16,940,046.66 r • tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate i 177,429.43 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 10,638,519.27 • 10,679,594.63 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 827,895.26 0.00 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 12.95 7 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 12.95 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic i 0.05 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear i 25.00 0.00 r 4 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass i 999.60 0.00 • tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 • 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 •1 4.9932 i 82.6995 ; 44.7823 i 0.2498 ; 8.2717 1.6582 i 9.5391 1.8114 i 1.6365 2.9832 • 0.0000 i 26,230.58;26,230.58 i 2.3224 ; 0.0000 i 26,288.64 '1 I I I I I I I I • 9 I I I I I I I I ' • I 29 i 29 i II i 33 ,� J J J 2023 •1 4.6581 i 32.2705 ; 44.0472 i 0.0930 ; 2.4917 1.4465 i 3.9382 0.6666 i 1.4269 2.0936 : 0.0000 i 9,032.143;9,032.143 i 0.7591 ; 0.0000 1 9,051.121 '1 I I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I 1 5 'I 1 I I 1 1 I I I • I I I e J J J J J J J J .• I J J J 2024 •1 89.1591 i 27.3329 ; 42.0026 i 0.0873 ; 2.4917 1.1321 i 3.6238 0.6666 i 1.1243 1.7910 : 0.0000 i 8,483.069;8,483.069 i 0.7838 ; 0.0000 1 8,497.557 '1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I 4 I 4 I 1 1 3 '1 I I I 1 I I I I • 1 Maximum 89.1591 82.6995 44.7823 0.2498 8.2717 1.6582 9.5391 1.8114 1.6365 2.9832 0.0000 26,230.58 26,230.58 2.3224 0.0000 26,288.64 11 29 29 33 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2022 9 4.9932 i 82.6995 i 44.7823 i 0.2498 i 8.2717 1.6582 i 9.5391 i 1.8114 i 1.6365 2.9832 0.0000 i 26,230.58 i 26,230.58 i 2.3224 0.0000 i 26,288.64 •1 I I I I I I I I ■ 29 I 29 I I 1 33 ;� :I I I I I I I I • I I I J J J J J J J J I J J J1. 2023 9 4.6581 i 32.2705 ; 44.0472 i 0.0930 1 2.4917 ; 1.4465 i 3.9382 ; 0.6666 i 1.4269 2.0936 • 0.0000 9,032.143;9,032.143 i 0.7591 ; 0.0000 i 9,051.121 '1 I I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I 1 5 '1 I I I I I I I I • I I I •I J J J J J J J J i J J J1. 2024 9 89.1591 i 27.3329 ; 42.0026 i 0.0873 1 2.4917 ; 1.1321 i 3.6238 ; 0.6666 i 1.1243 1.7910 : 0.0000 18,483.069;8,483.069 i 0.7838 ; 0.0000 1 8,497.557 '1 I I I I I I I • 4 4 I I 1 3 I I I I I I I I • I Maximum 89.1591 82.6995 44.7823 0.2498 8.2717 1.6582 9.5391 1.8114 1.6365 2.9832 0.0000 26,230.58 26,230.58 2.3224 0.0000 26,288.64 29 29 33 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 1 23.3317 i 0.0287 1 : 0.4677 0.4677 : i 0.4677 0.4677 • 0.0000 i 5,544.624: 5,544.624 i 0.1429 1 0.1009 1 5,578.277 9 I I I 1 I I I I ; 2 I 2 I 1 i 1 'I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I ■ I I 1 1 ;l J J J J J J J J . I J J J Energy •1 0.1146 i 0.9797 : 0.4196 i 6.2500e- : 1 0.0792 i 0.0792 : i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.200: 1,250.200 i 0.0240 : 0.0229 I 1,257.629 •1 I I I 003 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 I I I I 1 ■ 1 1 ;� J J J J J J J J J J J Mobile .1 2.4971 i 16.5393 : 32.0045 i 0.1477 : 12.7073 1 0.0917 i 12.7990 : 3.3998 i 0.0855 3.4853 • i 15,111.76: 15,111.76 i 0.6865 : 115,128.93 '1 I I I I I I I I ; 81 I 81 I '1 I I I 1 I I I I ■ I I 1 i 14 Total 9.6475 22.0795 55.7558 0.1827 12.7073 0.6387 13.3459 3.3998 0.6324 4.0323 0.0000 21,906.59 21,906.59 0.8534 0.1239 21,964.83 24 24 79 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 23.3317 i 0.0287 0.4677 i 0.4677 i 0.4677 0.4677 • 0.0000 i 5,544.624 5,544.624 i 0.1429 0.1009 i 5,578.277 •1 I I I I I I I I ■ : 2 1 2 I I 1 1 ;� I I I I I I I I , I I ei J J J J J J J Jv I J J J 1. Energy �i 0.1146 i 0.9797 0.4196 i 6.2500e- 0.0792 i 0.0792 i 0.0792 0.0792 • 1,250.200 1,250.200 i 0.0240 0.0229 i 1,257.629 •1 I I I 003 I I I I I ■ 1 I 1 I I i 4 •� I I I I I I I I , I I I J J J J J J J J v J J J 1. Mobile �1 2.4971 i 16.5393 32.0045 i 0.1477 12.7073 0.0917 i 12.7990 3.3998 i 0.0855 3.4853 • I 15,111.76 15,111.76 i 0.6865 i 15,128.93 I I I I I I I I ■ 81 I 81 I I i 14 '� I I I I I I I I I I I Total 9.6475 22.0795 55.7558 0.1827 12.7073 0.6387 13.3459 3.3998 0.6324 4.0323 0.0000 21,906.59 21,906.59 0.8534 0.1239 21,964.83 24 24 79 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 -Demolition :Demolition 13/5/2022 14/1/2022 1 5: 20: i + I , 1 1 ✓ i -I 2 -Site Preparation :Grading !4/30/2022 :5/27/2022 1 5,� 2- 07 i r i , , , 3 -Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Site Preparation !4/2/2022 :4/15/2022 � 51 1- 01 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 4 -Construction-East Building :Building Construction !6/25/2022 :5/12/2023 1 5� 2307 + I 1 1 5 -Grading :Grading 15/28/2022 :▪6/24/2022 1 51 2- 07 i + , 1 , 1 ✓ i , 6 -Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Site Preparation !4/16/2022 :4/29/2022 � 51 1- 01 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 7 -Construction-West Building :Building Construction 15/13/2023 :3/29/2024 1 5� 2307 i + ✓ i , I , 1 1 , 8 -Paving-East Building :Paving !3/30/2024 :4/26/2024 51 2- 0: i + ✓ i I , 1 1 , , 9 -Architectural Coatings East Bldg :Architectural Coating 15/25/2024 i6/21/2024 1 i 51 207 + ✓ J4/2712024 15/24/2024 I , 1 1 10 -Paving-West Building :Paving ' 5 I i 11 :Architectural Coatings-West Bldg:A▪ rchitectural Coating .6/22/2024 .7/19/2024 5. 20: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 45 Acres of Paving: 1.8 Residential Indoor: 527,654; Residential Outdoor: 175,885; Non-Residential Indoor: 12,359; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,120; Striped Parking Area: 12,624(Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 11 8.001 81: 0.73 ; Demolition :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158 0.38 Demolition :Generator Sets ; 2 4.00i 84' 0.74 y ; Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 2 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00i 212' 0.43 y ; Site Preparation :Excavators ; 0 8.00i 158' 0.38 y ; Site Preparation :Graders ; 1 8.00i 187' 0.41 y ; Site Preparation :Rollers ; 2 8.00i 80' 0.38 Site Preparation :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Site Preparation :Scrapers ; 1 8.00i 367' 0.48 y ; Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.001 212: 0.43 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158: 0.38 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00i 247' 0.40 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Trenching/Utilites-East Building :Trenchers ; 2 8.00i 78' 0.50 y ; Construction-East Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78: 0.48 Construction-East Building :Cranes ; 1 7.00i 231' 0.29 y ; Construction-East Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00i 89' 0.20 1 y _ Construction-East Building Generator Sets ; 2 8.00i 84' 0.74 y ; Construction-East Building :Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.00i 100' 0.40 .1. ; Construction-East Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00i 97' 0.37 y ; Construction-East Building :Welders ; 0 8.00i 46' 0.45 .1. ; Grading :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00i 212' 0.43 .1. ; Grading :Excavators ; 0 8.001 158: 0.38 * r Grading :Graders 1' 8.00: 187' 0.41 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter • Grading •Rollers 2• 8.00• 80• 0.38 Grading [Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247' 0.40 • y i Grading [Scrapers ; 1 8.00 367• 0.48 • J. ; Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 8.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Crawler Tractors ; 2 8.00 212• 0.43 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Excavators ; 1 8.001 158• 0.38 J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building :Rubber Tired Dozers ; 0 8.00 247• 0.40 • J. ; Trenching/Utilities-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1 8.00 97• 0.37 • J. i Trenching/Utilities-West Building [Trenchers ; 2 8.00 78• 0.50 J. ; Construction-West Building +Air Compressors ; 10 8.001 78• 0.48 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Cranes ; 0 7.00 231' 0.29 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Forklifts ; 0 8.00 89• 0.20 • J. ; Construction-West Building :Generator Sets ; 2 8.001 84• 0.74 I J. Construction-West Building [Rough Terrain Forklifts ; 2 8.001 100• 0.40 • J. i Construction-West Building +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 0 7.00 97• 0.37 J. ; Construction-West Building :Welders ; 0 8.00 46• 0.45 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 • J. i Paving-East Building [Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-East Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 Architectural Coatings East Bldg +Air Compressors ; 4 6.00 78• 0.48 Paving-West Building [Pavers ; 2 8.00 130• 0.42 J. ; Paving-West Building :Paving Equipment ; 2 8.001 132• 0.36 • J. ; Paving-West Building :Rollers ; 2 8.00 80• 0.38 * r Architectural Coatings-West Bldg :Air Compressors 4• 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6; 40.00. 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix I HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 6; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix !HDT_Mix THHDT I I Trenching/Utilites- 6; 40.00. 0.00i 2,880.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT Cnc.+Q..;Irl;n., , I I , I Construction 'East i 15: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Q..;Irl;nn , I I , I Grading 6; 40.001 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix THHDT I I , Trenching/Utilities- 6; 40.00. 0.001 1,440.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT \4/..n+Q.dlrlln., I I , I I Construction-West i 14: 200.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix T ' HHDT Q..;Irl;nn I I , I Paving-East Building ; 6; 40.001 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix THHDT I I , Architectural Coatings y 4; 40.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT Cnc.+Qlrl., I I , I I Paving-West Building 6: 40.00. 40.001 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix i HDT_Mix THHDT i r + i * + Architectural Coatings : 4' 40.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70: 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix •HDT_Mix 'HHDT \l1/..c.+Old, 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 4 2.5643 I 25.0937 I 17.7597 I 0.0351 I I 1.2177 I 1.2177 I 1 1.1441 : 1.1441 • 13,369.785 I 3,369.785 I 0.7586 I i 3,388.750 'I I I I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I I 3 .I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I Total I 2.5643 25.0937 17.7597 0.0351 1.2177 1.2177 1.1441 1.1441 3,369.785 3,369.785 0.7586 3,388.750 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I Hauling .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 9 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I MI Vendor 9 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I 1 I I I I I , I 1 I I 1 MI J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J T I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Worker 9 0.1907 1 0.1188 1 1.2457 1 3.8000e- 1 0.4471 1 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 I 2.5600e- 0.1211 • 1 378.4584 1 378.4584 1 9.8100e- I : 378.7036 '1 I I 003 003 1 I I 003 . 1 I 1 003 I I 'I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , I 1 1 1 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Off-Road �� 2.5643 1 25.0937 1 17.7597 1 0.0351 1 1 1.2177 1 1.2177 1 1 1.1441 1.1441 � 0.0000 3,369.785 1 3,369.785 1 0.7586 1 i 3,388.750 I I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I 1 3 'I I I I I 1 I I I , I I I I 1 Total 2.5643 25.0937 17.7597 0.0351 1.2177 1.2177 1.1441 1.1441 0.0000 3,369.785 3,369.785 0.7586 3,388.750 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 1 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 '� 003 003 003 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 3.1815 0.0000 3.1815 i 0.3435 0.0000 0.3435 •• i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t '� Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 : 0.0427 i : 1.1687 : 1.1687 i : 1.0752 : 1.0752 • 14,137.845:4,137.845: 1.3383 i 14,171.301 '� I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 3.1815 1.1687 4.3502 0.3435 1.0752 1.4187 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 1 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 '� 003 003 003 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 3.1815 0.0000 3.1815 i 0.3435 0.0000 0.3435 •• i : 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J J J J t Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 0.0427 i 1.1687 1.1687 i 1.0752 1.0752 1 0.0000 i 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 i 1 4,171.301 9 I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 3.1815 1.1687 4.3502 0.3435 1.0752 1.4187 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 1 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 '� 003 003 003 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 2.7847 : 0.0000 1 2.7847 i 0.3111 : 0.0000 ; 0.3111 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 i 22.2277 i 15.3206 0.0307 i 1.1084 1 1.1084 i 1.0197 1 1.0197 • i 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 i i 2,997.257 9 I I I I I I I • 8 I 8 I I u 8 '� I I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 2.7847 1.1084 3.8931 0.3111 1.0197 1.3308 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I Hauling 41.6919 I 60.3531 I 11.2441 0.2153 I 5.0399 0.1562 I 5.1961 I 1.3817 0.1495 1.5312 • 122,878.90 I I I 22,878.90 1.3510 I i 22,912.68 9 I I I .I ' I I I I I I I ' • I 67 ' 67 I I 1 19 ,I J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I I I I I I I I I Vendor .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 'I • I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I I I II I J J J t Worker 9 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 � 378.4584 1378.4584 I9.8100e- I i 378.7036 I' 003 I II 003 I I 003 I ' . I 003 I II I I Total 1.8826 60.4719 12.4898 0.2191 5.4870 0.1590 5.6460 1.5003 0.1520 1.6524 • 23,257.36 23,257.36 1.3608 23,291.38 51 51 55 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 Dust -I 2.7847 I 0.0000 I 2.7847 I 0.3111 I 0.0000 ; 0.3111 ••; I 0.0000 I I 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I• 'I J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 22.2277 I 15.3206 I 0.0307 I 1.1084 1 1.1084 I I 1.0197 1.0197 • 0.0000 2,973.217 12,973.217 1 0.9616 I i 2,997.257 'I I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I I 8 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 2.7847 1.1084 3.8931 0.3111 1.0197 1.3308 0.0000 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Trenching/Utilites - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I Hauling 41.6919 I 60.3531 I 11.2441 0.2153 I 5.0399 0.1562 I 5.1961 I 1.3817 0.1495 1.5312 • 122,878.90 I I I 22,878.90 1.3510 I i 22,912.68 9 I I I .I ' I I I I I I I ' • I 67 ' 67 I I 1 19 ,I J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I I I I I I I I I Vendor .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 'I • I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I �1 J J J J J J J J 7 I I I II I I J J J t Worker .1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 � 378.4584 1378.4584 I9.8100e- I i 378.7036 I' 003 I II 003 I I 003 I ' . I 003 I II I I Total 1.8826 60.4719 12.4898 0.2191 5.4870 0.1590 5.6460 1.5003 0.1520 1.6524 . 23,257.36 23,257.36 1.3608 23,291.38 51 51 55 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road - 3.9372 I 31.2581 I 37.7657 I 0.0647 I I 1.6386 I 1.6386 I I 1.6182 1.6182 • 16,155.195 I 6,155.195 I 0.6776 I i 6,172.134 'I I I I I I I I I I 3 I 3 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , . I I I I I Total 3.9372 31.2581 37.7657 0.0647 1.6386 1.6386 1.6182 1.6182 6,155.195 6,155.195 0.6776 6,172.134 3 3 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.1024 i 3.6155 i 0.7882 0.0103 i 0.2562 5.7200e- 0.2619 i 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 i 1,085.025 1,085.025 0.0771 i i 1,086.952 9 I 1 1 003 1 I : 003 1 0 0 I i 4 '� 1 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.9535 i 0.5937 i 6.2284 0.0190 i 2.2355 0.0139 2.2494 i 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 i 1,892.292 1 1,892.292 0.0490 i i 1,893.518 9I I I I I I • 0 I 0 I I I 0 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 3.9372 i 31.2581 i 37.7657 : 0.0647 i : 1.6386 : 1.6386 i : 1.6182 : 1.6182 •. 0.0000 i 6,155.195:6,155.195: 0.6776 i i 6,172.134 '1 I I I I 1 I I I I 3 I 3 I I 1 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Total 3.9372 31.2581 37.7657 0.0647 1.6386 1.6386 1.6182 1.6182 0.0000 6,155.195 6,155.195 0.6776 6,172.134 3 3 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.1024 i 3.6155 i 0.7882 0.0103 i 0.2562 5.7200e- 0.2619 i 0.0738 5.4700e- 0.0792 i 1,085.025 1,085.025 0.0771 i i 1,086.952 9 I 1 1 003 1 I : 003 1 0 0 I i 4 '� 1 1 1 . 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker 9 0.9535 i 0.5937 i 6.2284 0.0190 i 2.2355 0.0139 2.2494 i 0.5929 0.0128 0.6057 i 1,892.292 1 1,892.292 0.0490 i i 1,893.518 9I I I I I I • 0 I 0 I I i 0 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0559 4.2092 7.0166 0.0293 2.4917 0.0196 2.5113 0.6666 0.0183 0.6849 2,977.317 2,977.317 0.1261 2,980.470 0 0 4 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road .1 3.6862 i 28.9417 i 37.6666 0.0647 i 1.4301 1.4301 i 1.4118 1.4118 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 i i 6,171.618 I I I I 1 I I I 5 5 I I I 2 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.6862 28.9417 37.6666 0.0647 1.4301 1.4301 1.4118 1.4118 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 6,171.618 5 5 2 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 91 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0772 i 2.7944 i 0.6705 0.0100 i 0.2562 2.8300e- 0.2590 i 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 i 1,055.593 1,055.593 0.0618 i i 1,057.137 9 003 I I 003 I 4 I 4 I I i 7 '� I I • I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Worker •1 0.8947 i 0.5344 i 5.7101 0.0183 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 1,821.266 1 1,821.266 0.0440 i i 1,822.365 9I I I I 8 I 8 I I 7 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 3.6862 i 28.9417 I 37.6666 i 0.0647 i ; 1.4301 I 1.4301 ; i 1.4118 1.4118 •• 0.0000 i 6,155.283 i 6,155.283; 0.6534 i i 6,171.618 y I I I I I I I I I 5 I 5 I I I 2 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.6862 28.9417 37.6666 0.0647 1.4301 1.4301 1.4118 1.4118 0.0000 6,155.283 6,155.283 0.6534 6,171.618 5 5 2 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Construction - East Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 1 I I ; I 1 I I 1 '� 1 I I I . I I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0772 i 2.7944 i 0.6705 0.0100 i 0.2562 2.8300e- 0.2590 i 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 i 1,055.593 1,055.593 0.0618 i i 1,057.137 9 003 I I 003 I 4 I 4 I I i 7 '� I I . I 1 I I 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J Worker •1 0.8947 i 0.5344 i 5.7101 0.0183 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 1,821.266 1 1,821.266 0.0440 i i 1,822.365 9I I I I • 8 I 8 I I 7 9I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 2.3861 0.0000 2.3861 i 0.2577 0.0000 0.2577 i i 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I I I I • I I I I •� I I I I I I I I I I J J J J J J J J m J I J t '� Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 : 0.0427 i : 1.1687 1 1.1687 i : 1.0752 : 1.0752 • i 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1 1.3383 i i 4,171.301 '� I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I I I I I I I I I Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.3861 1.1687 3.5548 0.2577 1.0752 1.3328 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 : 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 '� 003 003 003 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 2.3861 i 0.0000 2.3861 0.2577 i 0.0000 0.2577 • i 1 0.0000 : i i 0.0000 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 •� I I I I I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J J I J t Off-Road 9 2.5506 i 29.6686 i 16.4479 0.0427 1 1.1687 1.1687 i 1.0752 1.0752 1 0.0000 i 4,137.845 1 4,137.845 1.3383 i 1 4,171.301 9 I I 1 1 I I • 2 I 2 I I u 8 '1 I I 1 1 I I • I I I I Total 2.5506 29.6686 16.4479 0.0427 2.3861 1.1687 3.5548 0.2577 1.0752 1.3328 0.0000 4,137.845 4,137.845 1.3383 4,171.301 2 2 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 1 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 '� 003 003 003 I I 003 I 1 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- 0.4499 0.1186 2.5600e- 0.1211 378.4584 378.4584 9.8100e- 378.7036 003 003 003 003 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i 1.3924 : 0.0000 : 1.3924 i 0.1556 : 0.0000 : 0.1556 •• i : 0.0000 : i 1 0.0000 I I I 1 1 I I ; I I I I 1 •� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J m J I J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 i 22.2277 i 15.3206 0.0307 i 1.1084 1.1084 i 1.0197 1 1.0197 • i 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 i i 2,997.257 9 I I I 1 I I I • 8 I 8 I I u 8 '� I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 1.3924 1.1084 2.5008 0.1556 1.0197 1.1753 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I Hauling 40.8459 I 30.1766 I 5.6221 0.1077 I 2.5199 0.0781 I 2.5981 I 0.6909 0.0747 0.7656 • 111,439.45 I I I 11,439.45 0.6755 I i 11,456.34 9 I I I .I ' I I I I I I I ' • I 34 I 34 I I 1 10 ,I J J J J J J 7 I J J J t I I I I I I I I I Vendor .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 'I • I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I �I J J J J J J J J 7 I I I II I J J J t Worker .1 0.1907 0.1188 1.2457 3.8000e- 0.4471 2.7800e- I 0.4499 I 0.1186 12.5600e- 0.1211 � 378.4584 1378.4584 I9.8100e- I i 378.7036 I' 003 I II 003 I I 003 I ' . I 003 I II I I Total 1.0366 30.2953 6.8677 0.1115 2.9671 0.0809 3.0479 0.8094 0.0773 0.8867 • 11,817.91 11,817.91 0.6853 11,835.04 18 18 46 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I 1 1 Dust •I 1.3924 I 0.0000 I 1.3924 I 0.1556 I 0.0000 : 0.1556 ••; I 0.0000 I I 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I II I I I• 'I J J J J J J m J I J t Off-Road 9 2.0787 22.2277 I 15.3206 I 0.0307 I 1.1084 I 1.1084 I I 1.0197 1.0197 • 0.0000 2,973.217 1 2,973.217 1 0.9616 I i 2,997.257 'I I I I I I I I I • I 8 I 8 I I I 8 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I Total 2.0787 22.2277 15.3206 0.0307 1.3924 1.1084 2.5008 0.1556 1.0197 1.1753 0.0000 2,973.217 2,973.217 0.9616 2,997.257 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Trenching/Utilities -West Building -2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.8459 i 30.1766 i 5.6221 0.1077 i 2.5199 0.0781 2.5981 i 0.6909 0.0747 0.7656 i 11,439.45 1 11,439.45 0.6755 i i 11,456.34 9 I I •� I ' I ' ' I ' • I 34 I 34 I I 1 10 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I 1 I I 9I I I • I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker •1 0.1907 i 0.1188 i 1.2457 3.8000e- i 0.4471 2.7800e- : 0.4499 i 0.1186 : 2.5600e- 0.1211 � i 378.4584 : 378.4584 : 9.8100e- i i 378.7036 9 I I I 003 I I 003 1 I 1 003 I I 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I 1 I I 1 Total 1.0366 30.2953 6.8677 0.1115 2.9671 0.0809 3.0479 0.8094 0.0773 0.8867 11,817.91 11,817.91 0.6853 11,835.04 18 18 46 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road •i 3.3787 i 25.6032 i 36.0615 0.0597 i 1.2907 1.2907 i 1.2835 1.2835 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 i i 5,678.697 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 8 '1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 7 I 7 I I Total 3.3787 25.6032 36.0615 0.0597 1.2907 1.2907 1.2835 1.2835 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 5,678.697 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 91 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0772 i 2.7944 i 0.6705 0.0100 i 0.2562 2.8300e- 0.2590 i 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 i 1,055.593 1,055.593 0.0618 i i 1,057.137 9 003 I : 003 1 4 4 I i 7 '� 1 1 . I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8947 i 0.5344 i 5.7101 0.0183 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 1,821.266 1,821.266 0.0440 i i 1,822.365 9I I I I 8 I 8 I I , 7 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 3.3787 i 25.6032 i 36.0615 : 0.0597 1 : 1.2907 : 1.2907 i : 1.2835 : 1.2835 •• 0.0000 i 5,666.316: 5,666.316: 0.4953 i i 5,678.697 y I I I I 1 1 I I I 7 I 7 I I I 8 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Total 3.3787 25.6032 36.0615 0.0597 1.2907 1.2907 1.2835 1.2835 0.0000 5,666.316 5,666.316 0.4953 5,678.697 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '� I I • I I I I '� I I • I I I ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0772 i 2.7944 i 0.6705 0.0100 i 0.2562 2.8300e- 0.2590 i 0.0738 2.7100e- 0.0765 i 1,055.593 1,055.593 0.0618 i i 1,057.137 9 003 9003 4 4 i 7 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J .7 J J J Worker 9 0.8947 i 0.5344 i 5.7101 0.0183 i 2.2355 0.0135 2.2490 i 0.5929 0.0124 0.6053 i 1,821.266 1,821.266 0.0440 i i 1,822.365 9 I I I I Ig I g I I i 7 I I I I I I I I Total 0.9719 3.3287 6.3806 0.0283 2.4917 0.0163 2.5080 0.6666 0.0151 0.6818 2,876.860 2,876.860 0.1057 2,879.503 2 2 3 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 4 3.1851 i 24.0403 i 36.0409 i 0.0597 i 1.1159 i 1.1159 i 1.1093 1.1093 • i 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 i i 5,678.122 9i I I I I i I I 2 i 2 i I i 5 I I I I I I I Total 3.1851 24.0403 36.0409 0.0597 1.1159 1.1159 1.1093 1.1093 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 5,678.122 2 2 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 : 9.9900e- i 0.2562 : 2.8200e- : 0.2590 i 0.0738 : 2.6900e- 0.0765 � i 1,054.662: 1,054.662: 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 '� 003 003 003 3 I 3 I 1 1 3 '� 1 1 . I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.8442 i 0.4839 i 5.3154 0.0177 i 2.2355 0.0134 2.2489 i 0.5929 0.0123 0.6052 i 1,762.225 1 1,762.225 0.0401 i i 1,763.228 9I I I I I I 0 I 0 I I i 6 9I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 3.1851 i 24.0403 i 36.0409 : 0.0597 i : 1.1159 : 1.1159 i : 1.1093 : 1.1093 •• 0.0000 i 5,666.182: 5,666.182 : 0.4776 i i 5,678.122 9 I I I I 1 1 I I 2 I 2 I I 5 9I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Total 3.1851 24.0403 36.0409 0.0597 1.1159 1.1159 1.1093 1.1093 0.0000 5,666.182 5,666.182 0.4776 5,678.122 2 2 5 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.8 Construction -West Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 9 . 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 ; 9.9900e- i 0.2562 ; 2.8200e- ; 0.2590 i 0.0738 ; 2.6900e- 0.0765 . i 1,054.662; 1,054.662; 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 9003 003 003 1 3 I 3 I I 1 3 91 1 . I I 1 NI V Worker 9 0.8442 i 0.4839 i 5.3154 ; 0.0177 i 2.2355 ; 0.0134 ; 2.2489 i 0.5929 ; 0.0123 0.6052 . i 1,762.225; 1,762.225; 0.0401 i i 1,763.228 9 • I 0 I 0 I I , 6 '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.9203 3.2927 5.9617 0.0277 2.4917 0.0162 2.5079 0.6666 0.0150 0.6816 2,816.887 2,816.887 0.1019 2,819.434 2 2 9 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 i 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 • 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 9 I I I 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 1 1 I I I I• '1 - J J 1 1. Paving 9i 0.2358 i 1 1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; i 0.0000 : 0.0000 � i 0.0000 ; 1 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling i• 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ' • 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I , I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 : 9.9900e- i 0.2562 : 2.8200e- : 0.2590 i 0.0738 : 2.6900e- 0.0765 � i 1,054.662: 1,054.662: 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 '� 003 003 003 3 I 3 I 1 1 3 '� 1 1 . I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker •1 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i : 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I 1 Total 0.2449 2.9055 1.7094 0.0135 0.7033 5.5000e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.1500e- 0.1975 1,407.107 1,407.107 0.0698 1,408.852 003 003 2 2 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 : 0.0228 i : 0.4685 : 0.4685 i : 0.4310 : 0.4310 •. 0.0000 2,207.547:2,207.547: 0.7140 i 12,225.396 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I '1 J J J J J J J J - J J J t Paving 9 0.2358 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.9 Paving - East Building - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 9 . 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 : 9.9900e- i 0.2562 : 2.8200e- : 0.2590 i 0.0738 : 2.6900e- 0.0765 . i 1,054.662: 1,054.662: 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 9003 003 003 1 3 I 3 I I 1 3 91 1 . I I 1 NI V Worker 9 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 . i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i : 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I Total 0.2449 2.9055 1.7094 0.0135 0.7033 5.5000e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.1500e- 0.1975 1,407.107 1,407.107 0.0698 1,408.852 003 003 2 2 0 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •i 88.2672 1 1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 • i i 0.0000 1 1 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 9 I I I I 1 1 I I . I 1 I 1 m J I J 1. 'l I Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 i 0.0119 i : 0.2437 1 0.2437 : i 0.2437 : 0.2437 • i 1,125.792 i 1,125.792: 0.0634 : 11,127.377 '� I I I I I I I I . I 2 I 2 I I : 0 '� I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I I I I • I , I I 9I I I I I I . I I I I �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J t Worker 9 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i i 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I 1 Total 0.1688 0.0968 1.0631 3.5300e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 352.4450 352.4450 8.0300e- 352.6457 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating 9 88.2672 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 .1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 •� I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 0.0119 i 0.2437 1 0.2437 i 0.2437 0.2437 • 0.0000 i 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 i i 1,127.377 9I I I I I I I 2 I 2 I I 0 9 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.0000 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.10 Architectural Coatings East Bldg -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 9I I I I •I I I • I 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 . i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I • I , I I 9 • I I I ,� J . J Worker .1 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 . i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i i 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I , I I Total 0.1688 0.0968 1.0631 3.5300e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 352.4450 352.4450 8.0300e- 352.6457 003 003 003 003 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 i 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 • 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 9 I I I • 2 I 2 I I 1 3 '1 1 1 I I I I• '1 - J J 1 1. Paving 9i 0.2358 i 1 1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; i 0.0000 : 0.0000 � i 0.0000 ; 1 i 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling i• 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ' • 1 I I 1 9I I 1 I I I • I , I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 : 9.9900e- i 0.2562 : 2.8200e- : 0.2590 i 0.0738 : 2.6900e- 0.0765 � i 1,054.662: 1,054.662: 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 '� 003 003 003 3 I 3 I 1 1 3 '� 1 1 . I I 1 1 �� J J J J J J J J 7 J J J Worker 9 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i : 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I 1 Total 0.2449 2.9055 1.7094 0.0135 0.7033 5.5000e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.1500e- 0.1975 1,407.107 1,407.107 0.0698 1,408.852 003 003 2 2 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 9 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 : 0.0228 i : 0.4685 : 0.4685 i : 0.4310 : 0.4310 •. 0.0000 2,207.547:2,207.547: 0.7140 i 12,225.396 '� 1 1 I I 2 I 2 I I 3 '1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I '1 J J J J J J J J - J J J t Paving 9 0.2358 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 9I I I I I I I I I 1 Total 1.2240 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.11 Paving -West Building -2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '9 I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I 9 . 1 I I ,� J . J Vendor 9 0.0761 i 2.8087 i 0.6463 : 9.9900e- i 0.2562 : 2.8200e- : 0.2590 i 0.0738 : 2.6900e- 0.0765 . i 1,054.662: 1,054.662: 0.0618 i i 1,056.206 9003 003 003 1 3 I 3 I I 1 3 91 1 . I I 1 NI V Worker 9 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 : 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 . i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i : 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I . I , I I Total 0.2449 2.9055 1.7094 0.0135 0.7033 5.5000e- 0.7088 0.1923 5.1500e- 0.1975 1,407.107 1,407.107 0.0698 1,408.852 003 003 2 2 0 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating •i 88.2672 1 1 i i1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ;� I I I I I I I • I 1 I 1 q I I I I 1 1 I I . I 1 I 1 : m J I J 1. 1 I Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 i 0.0119 i : 0.2437 1 0.2437 : i 0.2437 : 0.2437 • i 1,125.792 i 1,125.792: 0.0634 : 11,127.377 '� I I I I I I I I . I 2 I 2 I I : 0 '� I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 '� I I I I I I • I I I I 1 '� I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,�1 J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor 9 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I �� J J J J J J J J • 7 I J J J t Worker 9 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 1 3.5300e- i 0.4471 : 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 352.4450 1 352.4450 : 8.0300e- i i 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 I I I 003 I I I 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I Total 0.1688 0.0968 1.0631 3.5300e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 352.4450 352.4450 8.0300e- 352.6457 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating 9 88.2672 i i i : 0.0000 1 0.0000 i : 0.0000 : 0.0000 •• i : 0.0000 1 i 1 0.0000 ;� I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 •� I I 1 1 I I • I I I I 1 J J J J J J J J . J J J t Off-Road 9 0.7231 i 4.8752 i 7.2405 0.0119 i 0.2437 1 0.2437 i 0.2437 0.2437 • 0.0000 i 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 i i 1,127.377 9I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I 0 9I I I I I I • I I I I 1 Total 88.9903 4.8752 7.2405 0.0119 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.2437 0.0000 1,125.792 1,125.792 0.0634 1,127.377 2 2 0 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.12 Architectural Coatings -West Bldg - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 4 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •• i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9I I • I I I I 1 9I I I • I 1 I I 1 ,� J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 • I I I • I I I I i �� J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J t Worker •1 0.1688 i 0.0968 i 1.0631 3.5300e- i 0.4471 2.6800e- : 0.4498 i 0.1186 : 2.4600e- 0.1210 � i 352.4450 1 352.4450 1 8.0300e- i i 352.6457 9 I I I 003 I I 003 1 I 1 003 I I ' 003 I i '� I I I I I I I I • I 1 I I 1 Total 0.1688 0.0968 1.0631 3.5300e- 0.4471 2.6800e- 0.4498 0.1186 2.4600e- 0.1210 352.4450 352.4450 8.0300e- 352.6457 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.4971 : 16.5393 i 32.0045 i 0.1477 i 12.7073 i 0.0917 i 12.7990 i 3.3998 i 0.0855 3.4853 : i 15,111.76 i 15,111.76: 0.6865 i i 15,128.93 •� . 81 I 81 I I 1 14 9I I I I I I I I I I I I. } 1. 1. 1. 1. } 1. 1. r } } 1. r Unmitigated • 2.4971 • 16.5393 • 32.0045 • 0.1477 • 12.7073 • 0.0917 • 12.7990 • 3.3998 • 0.0855 • 3.4853 • 15,111.76• 15,111.76• 0.6865 • • 15,128.93 81 81 14 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2 1,419.32 ; 1,419.32 1419.32 5,631,294 • 5,631,294 City Park ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Condo/Townhouse + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 General Office Building ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 T Y Parking Lot + 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool + 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall ; 83.03 ; 83.03 83.03 • 329,439 • 329,439 Total I 1,502.35 I 1,502.35 1,502.35 I 5,960,733 I 5,960,733 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 42 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.90 10.90 1 10.90 40.00 20.00 40.00 100 0 0 City Park 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 33.00 i 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 6 Condo/Townhouse 14.70 5.90 ? 8.70 ,i 40.00 I 20.00 • 40.00 • 100 • 0 r 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 General Office Building 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 77 • 19 r 4 Parking Lot 16.60 I 8.40 T 6.90 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 ▪ 8.40 ? 6.90 i 33.00 48.00 T 19.00 • 52 • 39 r 9 4 Strip Mall 10.90 • 10.90 10.90 • 16.60 • 64.40 ? 19.00 • 100 • 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800 i 0.111169 i 0.014289 i 0.004794 i 0.018611 i 0.065078 i 0.001365 i 0.001491: 0.005725 i 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + City Park • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i t i i i i t + Condo/Townhouse • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---t t t i t i i t i t + Enclosed Parking with Elevator • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---t t t t t t i t i t + General Office Building • 0.558745v 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 i- ---i i i t t i i t i t + Parking Lot • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799' 0.000830 i- ---i i i i i i i i i t + Recreational Swimming Pool • 0.558745' 0.035303: 0.181800: 0.111169: 0.014289: 0.004794: 0.018611: 0.065078: 0.001365: 0.001491: 0.005725: 0.000799: 0.000830 vI I I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. Strip Mall • 0.558745• 0.035303' 0.181800' 0.111169' 0.014289' 0.004794' 0.018611' 0.065078' 0.001365' 0.001491' 0.005725' 0.000799' 0.000830 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.1146 0.9797 : 0.4196 : 6.2500e- i i 0.0792 i 0.0792 i i 0.0792 0.0792 • i 1,250.200: 1,250.200: 0.0240 � 0.0229 i 1,257.629 Mitigated ;i 003 • i 1 I 1 I I 1 4 I I I I I I:I. } } } } } } } } r } } } r NaturalGas • 0.1146 • 0.9797 • 0.4196 • 6.2500e- • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 0.0792 • 0.0792 • • 1,250.200• 1,250.200• 0.0240 • 0.0229 • 1,257.629 Unmitigated 003 1 1 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10497.7 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . I 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I I 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I Condo/Townhous I 62.0919 •1 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- I 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- ; 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I 1 I 004 I 004 41 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Enclosed Parking 1 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 with Elevator 1 '1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I . I 1 I I 1 1 'I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , I 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I General Office i 46.5836 .1 5.0000e- 1 4.5700e- 3.8400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.5000e- 1 3.5000e- 1 1 3.5000e- ; 3.5000e- • 1 5.4804 I 5.4804 1 1.1000e- 1 1.0000e- i 5.5130 Building i ;' 004 1 003 I 003 1 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 i I I 004 I 004 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I , . I I I 1 I- 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 I : I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 'I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I : I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J I I : 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Strip Mall 120.3084 .1 2.2000e- 1 1.9900e- 1.6700e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.5000e- 1 1.5000e- I 1.5000e- 1.5000e- I 1 2.3892 I 2.3892 1 5.0000e- 1 4.0000e- : 2.4034 1 'I 004 I 003 I 003 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 1 1 'I I 1 I I I I I I , I I I I 005 I 005 Total 0.1146 0.9797 0.4196 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.200 1,250.200 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.629 003 1 1 4 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I Apartments Mid i 10.4977 •i 0.1132 1 0.9674 1 0.4117 1 6.1800e- 1 1 0.0782 1 0.0782 1 1 0.0782 0.0782 : 1 1,235.025 1 1,235.025 1 0.0237 1 0.0226 i 1,242.364 Rise I .I I 1 1 003 I I I I 1 . 1 5 I 5 I I 1 7 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I 1 -1 J J J J .1 1 J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I City Park 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I • I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I I I , • 1 I I I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 1 J J J 1 I : 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Condo/Townhous i 0.06209199 6.7000e- 1 5.7200e- 2.4300e- 1 4.0000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 1 4.6000e- 1 I 4.6000e- 4.6000e- I 1 7.3049 I 7.3049 1 1.4000e- 1 1.3000e- i 7.3483 e I '1 004 I 003 1 003 I 005 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 : 1 I 1 1 'I I 1 1 I I I I I , I 1 I I 004 I 004 -1 J J J J V I J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Enclosed Parking i 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator I '1 I 1 I I I I I I . I I I I I 1 '1 I I I I I I 1 1 , , 1 1 1 I 1 41 J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I General Office 10.0465836.1 5.0000e- 1 4.5700e- I 3.8400e- 1 3.0000e- 1 I 3.5000e- 1 3.5000e- 1 1 3.5000e- 3.5000e- 1 1 5.4804 I 5.4804 1 1.1000e- 1 1.0000e- i 5.5130 Building i ;: 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 I 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 i 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 I 1 1 i 9 J J J J J J J J I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Parking Lot 1 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I 1 i 41 J J J J J J J J 7 1 J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I Recreational I 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 Swimming Pool I 'I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 . 1 I I I I 1 '1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , • 1 I 1 1 1 ?I J J J J J J J J 7 I J J J 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I Strip Mall i 0.0203084.1 2.2000e- 1 1.9900e- I 1.6700e- 1 1.0000e- 1 I 1.5000e- 1 1.5000e- I 1.5000e- 1.5000e- I 1 2.3892 I 2.3892 1 5.0000e- 1 4.0000e- 1 2.4034 1 '1 004 1 003 I 003 005 1 I 004 I 004 I I 004 004 . 1 I I 005 1 005 1 1 '1 I 1 I I I I I I , • 1 I 1 1 1 Total 0.1146 0.9797 0.4196 6.2600e- 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 0.0792 1,250.200 1,250.200 0.0240 0.0229 1,257.629 003 1 1 4 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 7.0358 i 4.5605 i 23.3317 : 0.0287 : i 0.4677 i 0.4677 i i 0.4677 � 0.4677 : 0.0000 i 5,544.624: 5,544.624 i 0.1429 : 0.1009 i 5,578.277 9I I I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I I 1 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I :1- } } } } } } } } r 1. 1. } Unmitigated • 7.0358 • 4.5605 • 23.3317 • 0.0287 • • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.4677 • 0.0000 5,544.624• 5,544.624• 0.1429 • 0.1009 •5,578.277 2 2 1 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.4837 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating :: I I ,i I I I I I I 1 I • I I 1 • J J Consumer 9 5.3977 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • : 0.0000 i i I 0.0000 Products :: I '� I I I I I I I I • I I 1 Hearth 9 0.5047 i 4.3129 : 1.8353 i 0.0275 i : 0.3487 i 0.3487 : i 0.3487 0.3487 • 0.0000 5,505.882: 5,505.882 i 0.1055 : 0.1009 15,538.601 'I I I I I I I I I 4 1 4 I I I 1 'I I I I I I I 1 I • I I 1 •I I J J J I 1 ' Landscaping 9 0.6498 i 0.2475 1 21.4964 i 1.1400e- i 1 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 : I 39.6760 •I I 1 I 003 I I I I I • I I I I Total 7.0358 4.5605 23.3317 0.0287 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.0000 5,544.624 5,544.624 0.1429 0.1009 5,578.277 2 2 1 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory lb/day lb/day 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Architectural •i 0.4837 i 1 i i : 0.0000 i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 0.0000 • i : 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Coating •': .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I , I 1 I I ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J Consumer •1 5.3977 i 1 i i 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 . i : 0.0000 i i I 0.0000 Products •: I I I I I I I I . I I I I I '� I I I I I I I I . I I I I ,� J J J J J 7 I J J J Hearth •1 0.5047 i 4.3129 : 1.8353 i 0.0275 i : 0.3487 i 0.3487 : i 0.3487 0.3487 : 0.0000 i 5,505.882: 5,505.882 i 0.1055 1 0.1009 :5,538.601 •1 I I I I I I I I • I 4 I 4 I I : 1 •I I I I I I I 1 I . I I I I . J J J J J J J J I J J J Landscaping .1 0.6498 i 0.2475 : 21.4964 i 1.1400e- i : 0.1190 i 0.1190 : i 0.1190 0.1190 • i 38.7418 : 38.7418 i 0.0374 1 i 39.6760 •1 I I I 003 I I I I I . I I I 9I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 Total 7.0358 4.5605 23.3317 0.0287 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.4678 0.0000 5,544.624 5,544.624 0.1429 0.1009 5,578.277 2 2 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 48 Date: 9/30/2021 10:32 AM Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type I Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Attachment B Construction Operation 2022 Total Emission Rate Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1315 Total DPM (Ibs) 799.2306849 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0429 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.720547945 Total DPM (g) 362531.0387 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.235068493 Construction Duration (days) 302 Total Construction Days 735 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.00123411 Total DPM (Ibs) 217.6054795 Emission Rate(g/s) 0.005708791 Release Height(meters) 3 Total DPM (g) 98705.84548 Release Height (meters) 3 Total Acreage 5.2 Start Date 3/5/2022 Total Acreage 5.2 Max Horizontal (meters) 205.15 End Date 1/1/2023 Max Horizontal (meters) 205.15 Min Horizontal (meters) 102.58 Construction Days 302 Min Horizontal (meters) 102.58 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 2023 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Setting Urban Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.285 Setting Urban Population 176,379 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 1.561643836 Population 176,379 Total Pounds of DPM Construction Duration (days) 365 Start Date 3/5/2022 Total DPM (Ibs) 85.8 Total DPM (Ibs) 570 End Date 3/9/2024 Total DPM (g) 258552 Total Construction Days 735 Start Date 1/1/2023 Total Years of Construction 2.01 End Date 1/1/2024 Total Years of Operation 27.99 Construction Days 365 2024 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0312 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.170958904 Construction Duration (days) 68 Total DPM (Ibs) 11.62520548 Total DPM (g) 5273.193205 Start Date 1/1/2024 End Date 3/9/2024 Construction Days 68 Attachment C Start date and time 09/28/21 09:59:53 AERSCREEN 21112 Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project AERSCREEN Construction Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project AERSCREEN Construction DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** Emission Rate: 0.571E-02 g/s 0.453E-01 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 205.15 meters 673.06 feet Area Source Width: 102.58 meters 336.55 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 176379 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*) : not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2021.09.28 AltaCuvee AERSCREEN Construction.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics. . . Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 09/28/21 10:01:53 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 09/28/21 10:02:04 REFINE started 09/28/21 10:02:04 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 09/28/21 10:02:05 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 09/28/21 10:02:07 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.69621E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76131E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81622E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86250E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91010E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.91461E+01 103.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71251E+01 125.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50963E+01 150.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41465E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34837E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29835E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25963E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22878E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20380E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18332E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16593E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15140E+01 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13882E+01 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12804E+01 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11859E+01 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11024E+01 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10291E+01 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.96428E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90598E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85308E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80534E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Construction max conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76221E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72306E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68740E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65438E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62404E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59613E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57038E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54648E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52418E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50344E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48412E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46607E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44906E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43305E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41800E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40385E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39057E+00 1025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37798E+00 1050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36608E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35485E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34421E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33412E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32454E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31543E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30676E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29846E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29054E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43.56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28299E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27577E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26885E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26220E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25584E+00 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24973E+00 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24388E+00 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23826E+00 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23287E+00 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22770E+00 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22272E+00 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21792E+00 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21330E+00 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20884E+00 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20455E+00 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20041E+00 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19641E+00 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19255E+00 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18882E+00 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18522E+00 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18173E+00 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17836E+00 1825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17510E+00 1850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17194E+00 1875.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17018E+00 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16716E+00 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16423E+00 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_A1taCuvee AERSCREEN_Construction max_conc distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16139E+00 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15863E+00 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15596E+00 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15336E+00 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15083E+00 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14838E+00 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14599E+00 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14367E+00 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14141E+00 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13922E+00 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13708E+00 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13500E+00 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13297E+00 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13099E+00 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12907E+00 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12719E+00 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12536E+00 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12358E+00 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12184E+00 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12014E+00 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11848E+00 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11686E+00 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11528E+00 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11373E+00 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11222E+00 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11075E+00 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10931E+00 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43.56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10790E+00 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10652E+00 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10517E+00 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10385E+00 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10256E+00 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10130E+00 2775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10006E+00 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98853E-01 2825.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97668E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.96507E-01 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95370E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94256E-01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93165E-01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92095E-01 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91046E-01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90017E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89009E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88020E-01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87050E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86098E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85164E-01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84248E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83348E-01 3200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82465E-01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81598E-01 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80747E-01 3275.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79911E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_A1taCuvee AERSCREEN_Construction max_conc distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79090E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78283E-01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77491E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76712E-01 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75947E-01 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75195E-01 3450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74455E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73728E-01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73014E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72311E-01 3550.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71620E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70940E-01 3600.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70272E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69614E-01 3650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68967E-01 3675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68330E-01 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67703E-01 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67086E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66479E-01 3775.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65881E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65293E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64714E-01 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64143E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63581E-01 3900.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63028E-01 3925.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62482E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61946E-01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61416E-01 4000.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60895E-01 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60381E-01 4050.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59875E-01 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59376E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58885E-01 4125.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58400E-01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57922E-01 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57451E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56986E-01 4225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56528E-01 4250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56076E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55631E-01 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55191E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54758E-01 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54330E-01 4375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53908E-01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53492E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53082E-01 4450.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52676E-01 4475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52276E-01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51882E-01 4525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51492E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51107E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50728E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50353E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49983E-01 4650.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_A1taCuvee AERSCREEN_Construction max_conc distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49618E-01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49257E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48901E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48549E-01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48202E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47859E-01 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47520E-01 4825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47185E-01 4850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46855E-01 4875.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46528E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46205E-01 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45887E-01 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45571E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45260E-01 5000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_A1taCuvee AERSCREEN_Construction max_conc distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:43:56 AM] Start date and time 09/28/21 10:03:51 AERSCREEN 21112 Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project AERSCREEN Operations DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** Emission Rate: 0.123E-02 g/s 0.979E-02 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 205.15 meters 673.06 feet Area Source Width: 102.58 meters 336.55 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 176379 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*) : not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2021.09.28_AltaCuvee_AERSCREEN_Operations.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics. . . Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 09/28/21 10:05:47 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 09/28/21 10:05:57 REFINE started 09/28/21 10:05:57 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 09/28/21 10:05:59 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 09/28/21 10:06:00 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.15048E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16455E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17642E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18642E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19671E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.19769E+01 103.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15400E+01 125.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11015E+01 150.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89625E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75298E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64487E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56118E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49449E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44051E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39624E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35865E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32724E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30006E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27675E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25632E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23828E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22244E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20842E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19582E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18439E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17407E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:44.23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16475E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15629E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14858E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14144E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13488E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12885E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12329E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11812E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11330E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10882E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10464E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10074E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97063E-01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93600E-01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90348E-01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87290E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84419E-01 1025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81698E-01 1050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79126E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76698E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74399E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72218E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70147E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68179E-01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66305E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64510E-01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62799E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11.44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61166E-01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59606E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58111E-01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56674E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55298E-01 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53978E-01 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52713E-01 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51499E-01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50334E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49216E-01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48139E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47101E-01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46103E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45140E-01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44212E-01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43317E-01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42454E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41619E-01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40813E-01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40034E-01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39281E-01 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38552E-01 1825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37846E-01 1850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37163E-01 1875.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36784E-01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36131E-01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35498E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11.44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34884E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34288E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33709E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33147E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32601E-01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32071E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31555E-01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31054E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30566E-01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30091E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29629E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29179E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28741E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28314E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27897E-01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27492E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27096E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26710E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26334E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25967E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25608E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25258E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24917E-01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24583E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24256E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23938E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23626E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_AltaCuvee AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23322E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23024E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22732E-01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22447E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22168E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21895E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21628E-01 2800.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21366E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21110E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20860E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20614E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20373E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20137E-01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19906E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19679E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19457E-01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19239E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19025E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18815E-01 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18610E-01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18408E-01 3150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18210E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18015E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17824E-01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17637E-01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17453E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17272E-01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11.44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17095E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16920E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16749E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16581E-01 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16415E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16253E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16093E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15936E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15781E-01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15630E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15480E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15333E-01 3600.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15189E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15047E-01 3650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14907E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14769E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14634E-01 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14500E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14369E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14240E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14113E-01 3825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13988E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13864E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13743E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13623E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13505E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13389E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13275E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13162E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13051E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12942E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12834E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12728E-01 4125.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12623E-01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12520E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12418E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12317E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12218E-01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12121E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12024E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11929E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11836E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11743E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11652E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11562E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11473E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11386E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11299E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11214E-01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11130E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11047E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10965E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10884E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10804E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28 A1taCuvee AERSCREEN Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11.44:23 AM] 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10725E-01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10647E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10570E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10494E-01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10419E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10344E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10271E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10199E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10127E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10057E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99870E-02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99181E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98500E-02 4975.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97827E-02 5000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2021.09.28_AltaCuvee AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[9/30/2021 11:44:23 AM] Attachment D SWAP E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 (949)887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Matthew F.Hagemann,P.G.,*C.Hg** Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization, Investigation and Remediation Strategies Expert Testimony Industrial Stormwater Compliance CEQA Review Professional Certifications: *Professional Geologist **Certified Hydrogeologist Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Professional Experience: 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. Spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) and 1 Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater. While with EPA, served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. Led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultations as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and managing projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Positions held include: Government: • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist,U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(1989-1998); • Hydrogeologist,National Park Service,Water Resources Division(1998-2000); • Geologist,U.S.Forest Service (1986-1998) Educational: • Geology Instructor, Golden West College,2010-2104, 2017; • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 -1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 - 1995); Private Sector: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); • Senior Environmental Analyst,Komex H2O Science,Inc. (2000--2003); • Executive Director,Orange Coast Watch(2001-2004); • Geologist,Dames&Moore(1984-1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE, responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert, for both plaintiffs and defendants, in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to 2 hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. • Recommending additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce exposure to hazards from toxins. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation, for both government agencies and corporate clients, at more than 150 industrial facilities. • Serving as expert witness for both plaintiffs and defendants in cases including contamination of groundwater, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns, for both government agencies and corporate clients. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination inSouthern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. With Komex H2O Science Inc., duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimonyby the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronologyof MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronologyof perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinkingwater treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an 3 operating school in LosAngeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation withclients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch,an Orange County-based not-for-profit water-quality organization,led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities included: • Leading efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiating a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identifying emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups,including the SuperfundGroundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. Used 4 analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for contribution to the development of national guidance forthe protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Prepared geologic reports, conducted hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties included: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliancewith Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote"part B"permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources toprevent degradation of water quality,including the following: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military,mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone andOlympic National Park. • Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. 5 • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personalwatercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation-wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served as senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency,Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advising the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinkingwater supplies. • Shaping EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributingto guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improving the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earning an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers innegotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process. • Establishing national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. Geology: With the U.S. Forest Service,led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed fortimber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities included: • Mapping geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinating research with community stakeholders who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterizing the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large 6 hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: • Supervising year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducting aquifer tests. • Investigating active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: • At San Francisco State University,held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. • Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. • Part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017. Invited Testimony,Reports,Papers and Presentations: Hagemann,M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene,Oregon. Hagemann,M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.EPA Region 9,San Francisco, California. Hagemann,M.F.,2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making andPublic Participation. Brownfields 2005,Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann,M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins atschools in Southern California, Los Angeles. Brown,A.,Farrow,J.,Gray,A. and Hagemann,M.,2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBEReleases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National 7 Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Waterin Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix,AZ(served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Waterin the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann,M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to atribal EPA meeting,Pechanga, CA. Hagemann,M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to ameeting of tribal representatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking WaterSupplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann,M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invitedpresentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann,M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to ameeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in 8 Groundwater(and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA andState Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublishedreport. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.Unpublished report. Hagemann,M.F.,2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground StorageTanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal WatercraftUsage.Water Resources Division,National Park Service,Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George WrightSociety Biannual Meeting,Asheville,North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA SuperfundGroundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting,Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval AirStation, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. 9 Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui,October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Airand Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac to r i z a t i o n and Cl can up a t Closing Military Basesin California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL-contaminated Groundwater.California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings,Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting,v.35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations,2009-2011. 10 Attachment C SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE SWAP E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and 525 Broadway Avenue,Suite 203 i Litigation Support for the Environment Santa Monica,California 90401 Attn:Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Tel:(310)795-2335 Fax:(310)434-0011 Email:prosenfeld@swape.com Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport&Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment And Remediation Specialist Education Ph.D. Soil Chemistry,University of Washington, 1999.Dissertation on VOC filtration. M.S.Environmental Science,U.C.Berkeley, 1995.Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A.Environmental Studies,U.C.Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience Dr. Rosenfeld is the environmental chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE).His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological restoration. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing, petroleum, MtBE and fuel oxygenates, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins, furans, volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, and odor. Significant projects performed by Dr.Rosenfeld include the following: Litigation Support Client: Nexsen Pruet,LLC(Charleston,South Carolina) Serving as expert in chlorine exposure in railroad tank car accident where approximately 120,000 pounds of chlorine were released. Client:Buzbee Law Firm(Houston,Texas) Serving as expert in catalyst release and refinery emissions cases against BP Texas City. One case settled regarding worker exposure, but ongoing litigation remains involving -21,500 plaintiffs who have health claims and are seeking remediation from chemicals released from BP facility. Client: Girardi Keese(Los Angeles,California) SWAPE 1 Rosenfeld CV Serving as expert investigating hydrocarbon exposure and property damage for —600 individuals and —280 properties in Carson,California,where homes were constructed above a large tank farm formerly owned by Shell. Client:Brent Coon Law Firm(Cleveland,Ohio) Served as expert calculating an environmental exposure to benzene, PAHs, and VOCs from a Chevron Refinery in Hooven Ohio. Ran AERMOD to calculate cumulative dose. Client: Girardi Keese(Los Angeles,California) Served as expert testifying on hydrocarbon exposure to a woman who worked on a fuel barge operated by Chevron. Demonstrated that the plaintiff was exposed to excessive amounts of benzene. Client:Lundy Davis(Lake Charles,Louisiana) Served as consulting expert on an oil field case representing the lease holder of a contaminated oil field. Conducted field work evaluating oil field contamination in Sulfur,Louisiana. Property is owned by Conoco Phillips,but leased by Yellow Rock,a small oil firm. Client: Cox Cox Filo(Lake Charles,Louisiana) Serving as testifying expert on multimillion gallon oil spill in Lake Charles which occurred on June 19, 2006, resulting in hydrocarbon vapor exposure to hundreds of workers and residents. Prepared air model and calculated dose. Demonstrated that petroleum odor alone can result in significant health harms. Client: Cotchett Pitre&McCarthy(San Francisco,California) Served as testifying expert representing homeowners who unknowingly purchased homes built on an old oil field in Santa Maria,California.Properties have high concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in subsurface soils resulting in diminished property value. Client:Baron& Budd(Dallas,Texas)&Weitz&Luxenberg(New York,NY) Serving as consulting expert in MTBE Federal Multi District Litigation(MDL) in New York. Consolidated ground water data,created maps for test cases,constructed damage model,evaluated taste and odor threshold levels. Client:Law Offices Of Anthony Liberatore P.C.(Los Angeles,California) Served as testifying expert representing individuals who rented homes on the Inglewood Oil Field in California. Plaintiffs were exposed to hydrocarbon contaminated water and air, and experienced health harms associated with the petroleum exposure. Client: Baron&Budd P.C.Dallas Texas and Korein Tillery(Madison,County) Illinois, Private Wells Analysis: Coordinated data acquisition and GIS analysis evaluating private well proximity to leaking underground storage tanks to support litigation noting that private well owners should be compensated for MTBE testing. Client: Orange County District Attorney(Orange County,California) SWAPE 2 Rosenfeld CV Coordinated a review of 143 ARCO gas stations in Orange County to assist the District Attorney's prosecution of CCR Title 23 and California Health and Safety Code violators. Client:Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) Serving as testifying expert in a health effects case against ABC Coke/Drummond Co for polluting a community with PAHs,benzene,particulate matter,heavy metals,and coke oven emissions. Created air dispersions models and conducted attic dust sampling,exposure modeling,and risk assessment for plaintiffs. Client: Masry Vitatoe (Westlake Village, CA), Engstrom Lipscomb Lack (Los Angeles, CA) & Baron & Budd(Dallas Texas). Served as consulting expert in Proposition 65 lawsuit filed against the major oil companies for benzene and toluene releases from gas stations and refineries which contaminated groundwater. Settlement included over $110 million dollars in injunctive relief. Client: Tommy Franks Law Firm (Austin,Texas) Served as expert evaluating groundwater contamination which resulted from the hazardous waste injection program and negligent actions of Morton Thiokol and Rohm Hass. Interpreted drinking water contamination and community exposure. Client:Baron& Budd(Dallas Texas)and Sher Leff(San Francisco,California) Serving as consulting expert for several California cities which have filed defective product cases against Dow Chemical and Shell for 1,2,3-trichloropropane groundwater contamination. Generated maps showing capture zones of impacted wells for various municipalities. Client:Baron& Budd(Dallas Texas)and Korein Tillery(Madison County,Illinois) Serving as consulting expert for a Class Action defective product Atrazine claim filed in Madison County, Illinois against Syngenta and five other manufactures. The plaintiff class representative is Holiday Shores Water System which is evaluating health issues associated with atrazine, costing out treatment for filtration of public drinking water supplies. Client:Weitz&Luxenberg(New York,NY) Serving as expert on Property Damage and Nuisance claims resulting from emissions from the Countywide Landfill in Ohio. The landfill had an exothermic reaction or fire resulting from aluminum dross dumping,and the EPA fined the landfill$10,000,000 dollars. Client:Baron& Budd(Dallas Texas) Serving as consulting expert for a groundwater contamination case in Pensacola Florida where fluorinated compounds contaminated wells operated by Escambia County. Client:Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) SWAPE 3 Rosenfeld CV Serving as an expert on property damage,medical monitoring and toxic tort claims that have been filed on behalf of over 12,000 plaintiffs who were exposed to PCBs and dioxins/furans resulting from emissions from Monsanto and Cerro Copper's operations in East Sauget,Illinois. Client:Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) Served as an expert on groundwater case when Exxon Mobil and Helena Chemical released ethylene dichloride into groundwater resulting in a large plume. Prepared report on the appropriate treatment technology and cost,and flaws with the proposed on site remedy. Client: Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) Serving as an expert on air emissions released when a Bartlo Packaging Incorporated facility in West Helena Arkansas exploded resulting in community exposure to pesticides and smoke from combustion of pesticides. Client: Omara&Padilla(San Diego,Califorinia) Served as testifying expert on nuisance case against Nutro Dogfood Company that constructed a large dog food processing facility in the middle of a residential community in Victorville California with no odor control devices. The facility has undergone significant modifications including installation of a regenerative thermal oxidizer. Client:Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) Serving as an expert on property damage and medical monitoring claims that have been filed against International Paper resulting from chemical emissions from facilities located in Bastrop Louisiana, Prattville, Alabama, and Georgetown South Carolina. Client: Estep and Shafer(West Virginia) Served as expert running various air models to calculate acid emissions dose to residents resulting from emissions from a coal fired power plant in West Virginia. Client:Watts Law Firm(Austin,Texas),Woodfill Pressler(Houston,Texas),Woska&Ass.(Oklahoma) Served as testifying expert on community and worker exposure to CCA, creosote, PAHs, and dioxins/furans from a BNSF and Kopper's Facility in Somerville,Texas. Conducted field sampling,risk assessment,dose assessment and air modelling to quantify exposure to workers and community members. Client:Environmental Litigation Group(Birmingham,Alabama) Served as expert regarding community exposure to CCA, creosote, PAHs, and dioxins/furans from a Louisiana Pacific wood treatment facility in Florala, Alabama. Conducted blood sampling and environmental sampling to determine environmental exposure to dioxins/furans and PAHs. Client: Sanders Law(Colorado Springs,Co)and Vamvoras&Schwartzberg(Lake Charles,Louisiana) Serving as expert calculating chemical exposure to over 500 workers from large ethylene dichloride spill in Lake Charles,Louisiana,at the Conoco Phillips Refinery. Client: Baron&Budd P.C.(Dallas,Texas) SWAPE 4 Rosenfeld CV Served as consulting expert in a defective product lawsuit against Dow Agroscience focusing on Clopyralid, a recalcitrant herbicide that damaged numerous compost facilities across the United States. Client: Sullivan Papain Block McGrath&Cannavo(NY,NY)and The Cochran Firm(Dothan,MS) Served as expert regarding community exposure to metals, PAHs PCBs, and dioxins/furans from the burning of Ford Paint Sludge and municipal solid waste in Ringwood,New Jersey. Client:Rose,Klein Marias(Los Angeles,CA) Serving as expert in Proposition 65 cases, each one citing an individual facility in the Port of Oakland. Prepared air dispersion and risk models to demonstrate that each facility emits diesel particulate matter that results in risks exceeding 1/100,000,hence violating the Proposition 65 Statute. Client:Rose,Klein Marias(Los Angeles,CA) Serving as expert in 55 Proposition 65 cases, each one citing an individual facility in the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach as the defendant. Prepared air dispersion and risk models to demonstrate that each facility emits diesel particulate matter that results in risks exceeding 1/100,000,hence violating the Proposition 65 Statute. Client: Graham&Associates(Calabasas,CA) Served as expert in a case in which General Motors is the plaintiff and BP Arco is the defendant. Conducted air models to demonstrate that sulfur emissions from the BP Arco facility formed sulfuric acid,destroying paint on over 350 automobiles. Client:Rose,Mien Marias (Los Angeles,CA)and Environmental Law Foundation(San Francisco,CA) Served as expert in a Proposition 65 case against potato chip manufacturers. Conducted an analysis of several brands of potato chips for acrylamide concentration and found that all samples exceeded Proposition 65 No Significant Risk Levels. Client: Gonzales&Robinson(Westlake Village,CA) Served as testifying expert in a toxic tort case against Chevron(Ortho)for allowing a community to be contaminated with lead arsenate pesticide. Created air dispersion models, soil vadose zone transport models, and evaluated bioaccumulation of lead arsenate in food. Client:Environment Now(Santa Monica,CA) Served as expert for Environment Now to convince the State of California to file a nuisance claim against the automobile manufactures to recover MediCal damages from expenditures on asthma-related health care costs. Client: Trutanich Michell(Long Beach,California) Served as expert representing San Pedro Boat Works in the Port of Los Angeles. Prepared air dispersion,particulate air dispersion,and storm water discharge models to demonstrate that Kaiser Bulk Loading is responsible for copper concentrate accumulating in the bay sediment. Client: Azurix of North America(Fort Myers,Florida) SWAPE 5 Rosenfeld CV Provided expert opinions, reports and research pertaining to a proposed County Ordinance requiring biosolids applicators to measure VOC and odor concentrations at application sites'boundaries. Client: MCP Polyurethane(Pittsburg,Kansas) Provided expert opinions and reports regarding metal-laden landfill runoff that damaged a running track by causing the reversion of the polyurethane due to its catalytic properties. Risk Assessment And Modeling Client:ABT-Haskell (San Bernardino,California) Prepared air dispersion model for a proposed state-of-the-art enclosed compost facility. Developed odor detection limits to predict 1, 8,and 24-hour off-site concentrations of sulfur,ammonia, and amine as well as prepared a traffic analysis. Client: Jefferson PRP Group(Los Angeles,California) Evaluated exposure pathways for chlorinated solvents and hexavalent chromium for human health risk assessment of Los Angeles Academy (formerly Jefferson New Middle School) operated by Los Angeles Unified School District. Client: Covanta(Susanville California) Prepared human health risk assessment for Covanta Energy focusing on agricultural worker exposure to caustic fertilizer. Client: CIWMB (Sacramento California) Used dispersion models to estimate traveling distance and VOC concentrations downwind from a composting facility for the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Client: Carboquimeca(Bogota,Columbia) Evaluated exposure pathways for human health risk assessment for a confidential client focusing on significant concentrations of arsenic and chlorinated solvents contaminating groundwater used for drinking water. Client: Navy Base Realignment and Closure Team(Treasure Island,California) Used Johnson-Ettinger model to estimate indoor air PCB concentrations and compared estimated values with empirical data collected in homes. Negotiated action levels with DTSC. Client: San Diego State University(San Diego California) Measured CO2 flux from soils amended with different quantities of biosolids compost at Camp Pendleton to determine CO2 credit values for coastal sage under fertilized and non-fertilized conditions. Client: Navy Base Realignment and Closure Team(MCAS Tustin,California) Evaluated cumulative risk of a multiple pathway scenario with a child resident and a construction worker's exposure to air and soil via particulate and vapor inhalation,incidental soil ingestion,and dermal contact with soil. SWAPE 6 Rosenfeld CV Client: MCAS Miramar(San Diego,California) Evaluated exposure pathways of metals in soil, comparing site data to background data. Risk assessment incorporated multiple pathway scenarios assuming child resident and construction worker exposure to particulate and vapor inhalation, soil ingestion,and dermal soil contact. Client: Naval Weapons Station(Seal Beach,California) Used a multiple pathway model to generate dust emission factors from automobiles driving on dirt roads. Calculated bioaccumulation of metals,PCBs,dioxin congeners and pesticides to estimate human and ecological risk. Client: King County,Douglas County(Washington State) Measured PMI0 and PM2.5 emissions from windblown soil treated with biosolids and a polyacrylamide polymer in Douglas County Washington. Used Pilat Mark V impactor for measurement and compared data to EPA particulate regulations. Client: King County,Seattle,Washington. Conducted emission inventory for several compost and wastewater facilities comparing VOC,particulate, and fungi concentrations to NIOSH values estimating risk to workers and individuals at neighboring facilities. Air Pollution Investigation and Remediation Client: Republic Landfill(Santa Clarita,CA) Managed a field investigation of odor around a landfill during 30+ events. Using hedonic tone, butanol scale, dilution-to-threshold values,and odor character to evaluate odor sources and character and intensity. Client: California Biomass(Victorville,CA) Managed a field investigation of odor around landfill during 9+events. Using hedonic tone,butanol scale,dilution- to-threshold values,and odor character to evaluate odor sources,character and intensity. Client: ABT-Haskell(Redlands,California) Assisted in permitting a compost facility that will be completely enclosed with a complex scrubbing system using acid scrubbers,base scrubbers,biofilters,heat exchangers and chlorine to reduce VOC emissions by 99 percent. Client: Synagro(Corona,California) Designed and monitored 30-foot by 20-foot by 6-foot biofilter for VOC control from an industrial composting facility in Corona,California,reducing VOC emissions by 99 percent. Client: Jeff Gage,(Tacoma,Washington) Conducted emission inventory at industrial compost facility using GC/MS analyses for VOCs. Evaluated effectiveness of VOC and odor control systems and estimated human health risk. SWAPE 7 Rosenfeld CV Client: Daishowa America(Port Angeles Mill,Washington) Analyzed industrial paper sludge and ash for VOCs, heavy metals and nutrients to develop a land application program.Metals were compared to federal guidelines to determine maximum allowable land application rates. Client: Jeff Gage(Puyallup Washington) Measured effectiveness of biofilters at composting facility and ran EPA dispersion models to estimate traveling distance of odor and human health risk from exposure to volatile organics. Surface Water, Groundwater, and Wastewater Investigation/Remediation Client: Confidential (Downey,California) Managed groundwater investigation to determine horizontal extent of 1,000 foot TCE plume associated with a metal finishing shop. Client: Confidential (West Hollywood,California) Designed soil vapor extraction system that is currently being installed for confidential client. Managed groundwater investigation to determine horizontal extent of TCE plume associated with dry cleaning. Client: Synagro Technologies(Sacramento,California) Managed groundwater investigation to determine if biosolids application impacted salinity and nutrient concentrations in groundwater. Client: Navy Base Realignment and Closure Team(Treasure Island,California) Assisted in the design and remediation of PCB, chlorinated solvent, hydrocarbon and lead contaminated groundwater and soil on Treasure Island.Negotiated screening levels with DTSC and Water Board. Assisted in the preparation of FSP/QAPP,RI/FS,and RAP documents and assisted in CEQA document preparation. Client: Navy Base Realignment and Closure Team(MCAS Tustin,California) Assisted in the design of groundwater monitoring systems for chlorinated solvents at Tustin MCAS. Contributed to the preparation of FS for groundwater treatment. Client: MCP(Walnut,California) Conducted forensic surface water and sediment sampling. Designed and conducted bench scale laboratory experiments. Demonstrated that metal and organic contaminants in storm water and sediment from landfill flooded and chemically compromised a polyurethane track. Client: Mission Cleaning Facility(Salinas California) Prepared a RAP and cost estimate for using an oxygen releasing compound (ORC) and molasses to oxidize diesel fuel in soil and groundwater at Mission Cleaning in Salinas. SWAPE 8 Rosenfeld CV Client: King County,Washingon Established and monitored experimental plots at a US EPA Superfund Site in wetland and upland mine tailings contaminated with zinc and lead in Smelterville, Idaho. Used organic matter and pH adjustment for wetland remediation and erosion control. Client: City of Redmond(Richmond,Washington) Collected storm water from compost-amended and fertilized turf to measure nutrients in urban runoff. Evaluated effectiveness of organic matter-lined detention ponds on reduction of peak flow during storm events. Drafted compost amended landscape installation guidelines to promote storm water detention and nutrient runoff reduction. Client: City of Seattle(Seattle,Washington) Measured VOC emissions from Renton wastewater treatment plant in Washington. Ran GC/MS, dispersion models, and sensory panels to characterize,quantify,control and estimate risk from VOCs. Client: Plumas County(Quincy,California) Installed wetland to treat contaminated water containing 1%copper in an EPA Superfund site. Revegetated 10 acres of acidic and metal laden sand dunes resulting from hydraulic mining. Installed and monitored piezometers in wetland estimating metal loading. Client: Adams Egg Farm(St.Kitts,West Indies) Designed, constructed, and maintained 3 anaerobic digesters at Springfield Egg Farm, St. Kitts. Digesters treated chicken excrement before effluent discharged into sea.Chicken waste was converted into methane cooking gas. Client: BLM(Kremmling Colorado) Collected water samples for monitoring program along upper stretch of the Colorado River. Rafted along river, protecting water quality by digging and repairing latrines. Soil Science and Restoration Projects Client: Kinder Morgan(San Diego County California) Designed and monitored the restoration of a 110-acre project on Camp Pendleton along a 26-mile pipeline.Managed crew of 20, planting coastal sage, riparian, wetland, native grassland, and marsh ecosystems. Negotiated with the CDFW concerning species planting list and success standards. Client: NAVY BRAC(Orote Landfill,Guam) Designed and monitored pilot landfill cap mimicking limestone forest. Measured different species' root-penetration into landfill cap.Plants were used to evapotranspirate water,reducing water leaching through soil profile. Client: LA Sanitation District Puente Hills Landfill(Whittier,California) Monitored success of upland and wetland mitigation at Puente Hills Landfill operated by Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles.Negotiated with the Army Corps of Engineers and CDFG to obtain an early sign-off. SWAPE 9 Rosenfeld CV Client: City of Escondido(Escondido California) Designed, managed, installed, and monitored a 20-acre coastal sage scrub restoration project at Kit Carson Park, Escondido,California. Client: Home Depot(Encinitas,California) Designed, managed, installed and monitored a 15-acre coastal sage scrub and wetland restoration project at Home Depot in Encinitas,California. Client: Alvarado Water Filtration Plant(San Diego,California) Planned,installed and monitored 2-acre riparian and coastal sage scrub mitigation in San Diego California. Client: Monsanto and James River Corporation(Clatskanie Oregon) Served as a soil scientist on a 50,000-acre hybrid poplar farm. Worked on genetically engineering study of Poplar trees to see if glyphosate resistant poplar clones were economically viable. Client: World Wildlife Fund(St.Kitts,West Indies) Managed 2-year biodiversity study, quantifying and qualifying the various flora and fauna in St. Kitts' expanding volcanic rainforest. Collaborated with skilled botanists,ornithologists and herpetologists. Publications Rosenfeld,P.E.&Feng,L.(2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste,Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry,Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2011). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget,IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences 4(2011):113-125. Feng,L.,Wu, C., Tam,L., Sutherland,A.J., Clark,J.J.,Rosenfeld,P.E., (2010).Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States.Journal of Environmental Health 73(6):34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries,Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry,Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C.,Tam,L., Clark,J.,Rosenfeld,P. (2009). `Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States', in Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds.,Air Pollution XVII.• SWAPE 10 Rosenfeld CV Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modelling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution,Tallinn,Estonia.20-22 July,2009,Southampton,Boston.WIT Press. Tam L.K..,Wu C.D.,Clark J.J. and Rosenfeld,P.E.(2008)A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin(TCDD)Toxicity Equivalency Quotients(TEQ)In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities.Organohalogen Compounds,Volume 70(2008)page 002254. Tam L.K..,Wu C.D.,Clark J.J. and Rosenfeld,P.E.(2008)Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust:A Review. Organohalogen Compounds,Volume 70(2008) page 000527. Hensley,A.R.A. Scott,J.J.J. Clark,P.E.Rosenfeld(2007)"Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility"Environmental Research. 105,pp 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007) "The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities"—Water Science&Technology 55(5): 345-357. Rosenfeld,P.E., M. Suffet.(2007)"The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water,Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment"Water Science&Technology 55(5): 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E., (2007) "Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water,and Air in American Cities,"Elsevier Publishing,Boston Massachusetts. Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007) "Anatomy Of An Odor Wheel" Water Science and Technology, In Press. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007) "The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities."Water Science And Technology,In Press. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (2006) "Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility." The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006, August 21 — 25, 2006. Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. Rosenfeld,P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004) "Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash", Water Science and Technology,Vol.49,No. 9.pp. 171-178. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark J. J. and Suffet, I.H. (2004) "Value of and Urban Odor Wheel." (2004). WEFTEC 2004. New Orleans,October 2-6,2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004) "Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids"Water Science and Technology.Vol.49,No.9.pp 193-199. SWAPE 11 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld,P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004) "Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash", Water Science and Technology,Vol.49,No. 9.pp. 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004) Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter.Water Environment Research. 76(4): 310-315 JUL-AUG 2004. Rosenfeld,P.E.,Grey,M., (2003)Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium. Batelle Conference Orlando Florida.June 2 and June 6,2003. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. 2002. "Controlling Odors Using High Carbon Wood Ash." Biocycle, March 2002,Page 42. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). "Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento, California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. April 2002. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. 2001. Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air pollution.Vol. 127 Nos. 1-4,pp. 173-191 Rosenfeld,P.E.,and Henry C. L.,2000.Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality.29:1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. 2001. Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity.Water Environment Research.73: 363-367. Rosenfeld,P.E., and C.L. Henry. 2001. Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants Water Environment Research,73: 388-392. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., 2001. High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research.Volume 131 No. 1-4,pp.247-262 Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. 1998. Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings.Bellevue Washington. Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. 1998. Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond,Washington State. P.Rosenfeld. 1992. The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail.Heritage Magazine of St.Kitts,Vol. 3 No.2. P. Rosenfeld. 1993. High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, Vol. 7,No. 1, 1993. SWAPE 12 Rosenfeld CV P.Rosenfeld. 1992. British West Indies,St.Kitts. Surf Report,April issue. P.Rosenfeld. 1998. Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil.Doctoral Thesis.University of Washington College of Forest Resources. P. Rosenfeld. 1994. Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees On Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County,California. P. Rosenfeld. 1991. How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World.Bachelors Thesis.University of California. England Environmental Agency, 2002. Landfill Gas Control Technologies. Publishing Organization Environment Agency,Rio House,Waterside Drive,Aztec West,Almondsbury BRISTOL,BS32 4UD Presentations Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. "Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water."Urban Environmental Pollution, Boston,MA,June 20-23,2010. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. "Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois."Urban Environmental Pollution, Boston,MA,June 20-23,2010. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009) "Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States" Presentation at the 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, April 19-23,2009.Tuscon,AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009) "Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams(AFFF) at Airports in the United States"Presentation at the 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, April 19-23,2009.Tuscon,AZ. Rosenfeld,P. E. (2007)"Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility"Platform Presentation at the 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water, October 15-18, 2007. University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (2007) "The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant" Platform Presentation at the 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water,October 15-18,2007.University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. SWAPE 13 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P. E. (2007) "Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions"Poster Presentation at the 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water, October 15-18,2007.University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. "Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP)" — Platform Presentation at the Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS)Annual Meeting,San Diego,CA,3/2007 Rosenfeld P. E. "Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama" — Platform Presentation at the AEHS Annual Meeting, San Diego,CA,3/2007 Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (2006) "Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility." APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition, Boston Massachusetts.November 4 to 8th,2006. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals." Mealey's C8/PFOA Science,Risk&Litigation Conference"October 24,25.The Rittenhouse Hotel,Philadelphia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. September 19.Hilton Hotel,Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP." PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. September 19.Hilton Hotel in Irvine,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs."Mealey's Groundwater Conference. September 26,27.Ritz Carlton Hotel,Marina Del Ray,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals." International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. June 7,8. Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel,Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. "Rate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals". 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. July 21-22, 2005. Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. `Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation." 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. July 21-22,2005.Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology,A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. May 5-6,2004.Congress Plaza Hotel,Chicago Illinois. SWAPE 14 Rosenfeld CV Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D., 2004. Perchlorate Toxicology. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. March 7th,2004.Pheonix Arizona. Hagemann,M.F., Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D. and Rob Hesse, 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal representatives,Parker,AZ. Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D.A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association.Radison Hotel,Sacramento,California.April 7,2004. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.February 20-21,2003.Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Marriott Hotel.Anaheim California.February 6-7,2003. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Sacramento California.October 23,2002 Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. 2002. Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Barcelona Spain.October 7- 10. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. 2002. Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association.Barcelona Spain. October 7- 10. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. 2002. Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association.Vancouver Washington. September 22-24. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. 2002. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Indianapolis, Maryland. November 11-14. Rosenfeld. P.E. 2000. Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Anaheim California. September 16,2000. Rosenfeld. P. E. 2000. Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. October 16, 2000.Ocean Shores, California Rosenfeld, P. E. 2000. Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Sacramento California. SWAPE 15 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. 1998. Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings.Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld,P.E., and C.L. Henry. 1999. An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. 1998. Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil.Brown and Caldwell, Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. 1998. Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest Lake Chelan,Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. 1997. Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America,Anaheim California. Professional History Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise(SWAPE);2003 to present;Founding And Managing Partner UCLA School of Public Health;2007 to present;Lecturer(Asst Res) UCLA School of Public Health;2003 to 2006;Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program;2002-2004;Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment,2001-2002;Research Associate Komex H2O Science,2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association,2002-2004;Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001;Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego,2000-2001;Remediation Project Manager Ogden(now Amec), San Diego,2000-2000;Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego,California, 1999—2000;Risk Assessor King County,Seattle, 1996— 1999; Scientist James River Corp.,Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber,Davenport,California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp.,California and USFS,Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund,St.Kitts,West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Bureau of Land Management,Kremmling Colorado 1990; Scientist SWAPE 16 Rosenfeld CV Teaching Experience UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 2010) Teach Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focuses on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course In Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002.Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board,April and May,2001.Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego,Ventura,and San Francisco.Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5 2002 Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry,Organic Soil Amendments,and Soil Stability. U.C.Berkeley,Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost.2001. Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils.2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association,Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. SWAPE 17 Rosenfeld CV Kellogg Foundation,Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St.Kitts in West Indies. 1993. Cases that Dr. Rosenfeld Provided Deposition or Trial Testimony In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina,County of Aiken David Anderson,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Norfolk Southern Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number: 2007-CP-02-1584 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Drummond Company Inc.,et al.,Defendants Civil action No. CV 2008-2076 In the Ninth Judicial District Court,Parish of Rapides, State of Louisiana Roger Price,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Roy O.Martin,L.P.,et al.,Defendants. Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G In the United States District Court,Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Citgo Petroleum Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV1052 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Chevron Oil Company,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 1:05 CV 227 In the Fourth Judicial District Court,Parish of Calcasieu,State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabie,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Citgo Petroleum Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 07-2738 G In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court,Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Leon B.Brydels,Plaintiffs,vs. Conoco,Inc.,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 2004-6941 Division A In the District Court of Tarrant County,Texas, 153`d Judicial District Linda Faust,Plaintiff,vs.Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company,Witco Chemical Corporation A/K/A Witco Corporation,Solvents and Chemicals,Inc. and Koppers Industries,Inc.,Defendants. Case Number 153-212928-05 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Nutro Products,Inc.,a California Corporation and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,Defendants. John Loney,Plaintiff,vs.James H.Didion,Sr.;Nutro Products,Inc.;DOES 1 through 20,inclusive, Defendants. Case Number VCVVSO44671 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama,Northern Division James K.Benefield,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.International Paper Company,Defendant. Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley,Plaintiffs,vs.Peter T.Hoss,as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration&Production Company,a Delaware corporation;Rayne Water Conditioning,Inc.,a SWAPE 18 Rosenfeld CV California corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,Defendants. Case Number SC094173 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm,et al.,all individually,Plaintiffs,vs.Unocal Corporation,a Delaware Corporation;Union Oil Company of California,a California corporation;Chevron Corporation,a California corporation;ConocoPhillips,a Texas corporation;Kerr-McGee Corporation,an Oklahoma corporation;and DOES 1 though 100,Defendants. Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas,Eastern District of Arkansas Harry Stephens Farms,Inc,and Harry Stephens,individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership,Plaintiffs,vs.Helena Chemical Company,and Exxon Mobil Corp.,successor to Mobil Chemical Co.,Defendants. Case Number 2:06-CV-00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas,Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100,Defendants. Civil Action Number 07-4037 In The Superior Court of the State of California County of Santa Cruz Constance Acevedo,et al.Plaintiffs Vs.California Spray Company,et al.Defendants Case No CV 146344 In the District Court of Texas 21 St Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis,Plaintiff,vs.Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company,Defendant. Case Number 25,151 SWAPE 19 Rosenfeld CV