HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-04-27 - Agenda Packet
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
April 27, 2022
7:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call: Chair Dopp
Vice Chair Williams
Commissioner Morales
Commissioner Boling
Commissioner Daniels
B. Public Communications
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Preservation
Commission (“Planning Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the
agenda that is within the Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not
discuss any issue not included on the agenda but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent
meeting.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2022.
D. Public Hearings
D1. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master Plan
and construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of
commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51,
-55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map
20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074)
D2. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OF DAYTON DRIVE AND BUFFALO AVENUE –
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 - PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS - A request to
operate an 85,026 square foot Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution (Medium) land use in the
Neo Industrial (NI) District at 11601 Dayton Drive; APN: 0229-262-09. The project qualifies as a
Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – operation, permitting, leasing,
or minor alteration of existing structures.
HPC/PC Agenda – April 27, 2022
Page 2 of 3
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
D3. Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council to Adopt a Comprehensive revision to Title
17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Adopt a Revised Zoning Map
and Repeal or Amend Several Specific Plans, Planned Communities and Master Plans to
Implement the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. This Item Will be Forwarded to City Council
for Final Action.
E. Director Announcements
F. Commission Announcements
G. Adjournment
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,
given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson
may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the
audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning
Commission, please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the
microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located on the podium. It is important to list
your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to.
Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an
item, the Chair may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard.
Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.”
Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for
distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to
be used for the official public record.
As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be
distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record.
All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for
scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director.
HPC/PC Agenda – April 27, 2022
Page 3 of 3
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the
Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the
City Clerk’s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,279 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees
are established and governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cell phones while meeting is in session.
Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes can be found at
www.CityofRC.us.
I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April
21, 2022, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code
54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission Agenda
April 13, 2022
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
7:00 p.m.
The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on
April 13, 2022. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp 7:01 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Boling and
Commissioner Daniels; Commissioner Williams.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Matt Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City
Manager-Community Development, Interim Planning Director; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy
Director of Planning; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Brian Sandona, Principal Civil Engineer;
David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services;
Noah Daniels, Finance Director; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate
Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chair Dopp opened public communications and hearing no one, closed public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 23, 2022.
Motion to adopt by Vice Chair Williams, second by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0 vote.
D. Public Hearing
D1. LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
ETIWANDA AVENUE – WOOD PARTNERS – A request to construct a mixed-use
development comprising of 259 residential units, 2 commercial units totaling 2,253 square-
feet, and 1 live/work unit with 816 square feet of non-residential space within the Urban
Corridor (UCR) District. APNs: 0229-311-14 and -15. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Design Review DRC2020-
00440.
Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and
presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Daniels expressed he likes the project, it’s well designed. He mentioned he
would like to see more commercial with this project. He noticed there is only one live/work unit.
He asked applicant to address. He commented the ball court is at a strange location. He asked
what type of commercial would be going into project, and if the developer have any tenants in
mind. Lastly, he confirmed with Vincent Acuna on the assigned parking map that guest parking
is in purple.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 2 of 9
Draft
Chair Dopp asked what are some of the benchmarks the City is looking at when determining
something meets mixed-use criteria in terms of mix of uses between commercial and residential
Vincent Acuna explained that a mixed-use development would have two or more uses but in
addition to having mixed-use within that project itself, it’s also important to view the mixed of
uses in the context of the larger neighborhood. In terms of this project, answering
Commissioner Daniels question, the reason why there is one live/work unit is because the
project was submitted under an SB330 application. This meant that the City, cannot reduce the
project density as proposed. Originally, the project had five live-work units and when four live-
work units were converted to two true commercial tenant spaces, this left one live-work unit. He
explained what constitutes a mixed-use, it has to be completely separate from the living unit.
Commissioner Daniels asked what the ratio is between residential and commercial space.
Vincent Acuna answered 1.5 % of the project is commercial.
Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney, mentioned as a reminder, that the project is under SB330,
which means under that legislation, the City will not be able to lower the density of a project as
proposed complies with the City’s objective standards. In short, if increasing commercial square
footage will reduce the number of residential units proposed, this cannot be done. Ms. Young
also noted time limits for reviews related to SB330 projects.
Commissioner Williams stated she is disappointed the project did not have a dedicated tot lot.
She explained a tot lot is a place where they can bring their kids to play before taking a nap.
There are 2- and 3- bedroom units and they will have children. You need a place for children
to play, otherwise, they will destroy the property. She firmly believes you need a place to take
your children to be children. She also said the bocce ball court on Foothill should be indoors
where it’s more private. She asked applicant to address these issues.
Chair Dopp opened public hearing.
Joe Gambill, Applicant, mentioned they added more parking spaces. All residents have
assigned parking. They also have security cameras on-site staff to enforce the parking
management plan. He mentioned bocce ball could be moved if it’s an an issue. He added this
property will be managed by Wood Partners, which is the same company as the developer.
Lindsay Tabaian, Law Firm of Allan Matkins, representing the applicant, spoke about the letter
received from Lozeau Drury firm. She said after reviewing the 641 pages received today, there
are no new comments in this letter that are not adequately addressed in the IS/MND that was
circulated for public review, which is part of this public record of proceedings tonight. She stated
the IS/MND complies with CEQA, is complete and addresses all comments including those
raised in this letter. There is no further response or changes to the environmental document
are needed based on these comments.
Chair Dopp asked what Lindsay thinks about some of the arguments in the letter. Chemical
formaldehyde being present and a risk, diesel being harmful and a threat to public health, and
a large amount of wildlife being killed as a result of the project. He asked what her response is
from an environmental perspective considering she is an expert in the field.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 3 of 9
Draft
Lindsay Tabaian responded that the comment about formaldehyde is an unsubstantiated
comment, which assumes that wood containing formaldehyde would be used in connection with
the project. She said it’s a new construction that has to comply with very strict environmental
standards in terms of the types of material used on-site. Compliance with those environmental
standards would ensure that none of the formaldehyde type impacts raised in the letter would
occur on-site. She explained the diesel particulate emissions is not an issue on this site. She
said in the original letter they included a screening Health Risk Assessment (HRA) for
construction, which alleged there would be diesel particulate and other air quality and GHG
impacts. Although an HRA is not required for a project of this type, the applicant prepared their
own detailed health risk assessment. It concluded there would be no diesel particulate impacts
associated with the project.
She spoke about impacts on wildlife. The biological assessment concluded that there would
not be any significant biological impacts. The IS/MND was done to the satisfaction of the CA
Fish and Wildlife.
Chair Dopp thanked her for her explanation and opened the public hearing.
The following persons commented on the project:
• Jordan Sisson, on behalf of Lozeau Drury, states the IS/MND was not up to standard and
requested the commission not take any action on the project until revisions are made.
• Eliseo Flores, resident, raised concerns about project affecting the neighborhood in terms
of parking and traffic.
• Marcos Rico, resident, raised following concerns: Traffic, noise and light pollution.
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondence was received after the preparation
of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted. The actual correspondence
should be referred to for details:
• Letter from Lozeau Drury, stating that the IS/MND failed as an informational document and
the project may have adverse environmental impacts. Request an Environmental Impact
Report EIR be prepared, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• Email received from Cain Estrada, resident, mentioned he is not against the project, but
has traffic concerns for the safety of his children.
Jason Pack, Principal with Fehr and Peers, responded to the traffic comments. He said the City did
require a full traffic study and the assessment identified Etiwanda and Foothill is congested and
currently not operating as well as it should. As such, the project will be making significant improvements
to the North bound approach and to the East bound approach and making frontage improvements along
Foothill. Regarding parking, he said they did provide in their parking memo for variety national parking
rates for similar type developments and took surveys at a similar development in Upland. He stated
that number of parking spaces provided for this project is significantly more than a similar development
in Upland. They felt comfortable that there will be adequate parking. There is a condition of approval
to ensure compliance with the parking management plan.
Commissioner Daniels stated that each tenant will have assigned parking. He asked about EV charging
stations in the subterranean parking garage.
Ted Young, Architect, responded that there are EV charging stations in the subterranean garage.
Commissioner Daniels asked how EV charges are assigned to tenants.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 4 of 9
Draft
Ted Young responded that EV stalls will be installed as needed. He said that, under the management
plan, there will be flexibility assigning those stalls permanently for someone who has electric car, or
where people can share it.
Commissioner Daniels asked how you determine the amount of EV spaces provided.
Ted Young answered that it is based in the Green Building Code, which currently requires 10% of all
stalls to be EV ready.
Lindsay Tabaian stated the Lozeau Drury’s very long letter does not include any new substantial
evidence or studies, other than a few statements from the experts in the record about how the
comments/response letter were not good enough in their expert opinion. She said there are other
factual reports that are offered that were not already included with the October 1st material that were
reviewed and responded to in detail.
Joe Gambill responded to resident concerns about light pollution. He explained all light standards in
parking lot are 14 ft. high, within city requirements. He also clarified that a 6-foot-high block wall will be
installed along the south and east property lines abutting residential property to further reduce light
pollution.
Commissioner Williams suggested adding a swing set. She said your tenants would appreciate it and
she will be very happy.
Joe Gambill stated they can do that.
Commissioner Morales asked what significant things they will do to help with the traffic and how much
the intersection improvement would cost
Joe Gambill explained that along Etiwanda running north, they are dedicating a traffic and bike lane
from the existing property. North of Foothill running east and west they are installing a bus lane. The
existing traffic signal on the corner, will be moved. He does not know exact dollar amount. He can
follow up.
Chair Dopp confirmed with Vincent Acuna it’s in the Conditions Item #5 for Engineering.
Vincent Acuna replied yes.
Commissioner Boling confirmed that the Standard Condition of Approval, Planning Department Item
#33, a 6 ft. block wall will be constructed along the north and east property lines of the project, abutting
single-family residential property.
Commissioner Boling expressed appreciation to the applicant for considering the neighborhood and
residents that surround it and for the project meeting the city’s parking requirements. He said they
have done a good job trying to increase the number of parking stalls on site. Regarding the tot lot
amenities, he asked will they be up and available during the day/evening hours or does it have to be
set up and taken down periodically.
Joe Gambill replied we have storage units to put them in. He said you would request from property
manager to check out and return when done.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 5 of 9
Draft
Commissioner Boling mentioned that the two commercial units have great visibility along Foothill Blvd.
He asked how customer parking would work, as well as loading/unload, as the nearest parking space
is roughly 200 feet from the units themselves.
Joe Gambill replied that the customers, employees, and deliveries would primarily park toward the rear
of the project and utilize the sidewalks to get to the commercial units.
Commissioner Boling asked if there were dedicated loading zones for the commercial units.
Joe Gambill answered no. He said with the parking spaces can coordinate deliveries.
Commissioner Boling expressed that he wants to make sure that the tenants of the commercial space
have a clear understanding of where their customers will park and where the deliveries can be
accommodated.
Chair Dopp suggested to flip the commercial and visitor parking in the north side with the 12 and 6 units
and maybe during off hours.
Joe Gambill replied yes, that could be done.
Chair Dopp mentioned he has concerns of the location of bocce ball being close to Foothill. Not the
best placement if it will be actively utilized.
Joe Gambill responded it can be relocated.
Commissioner Boling asked about underground utilities. Is it anticipated that the utilities will be
underground.
Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer, answered yes, they are conditioned to underground utilities
along Etiwanda and Foothill.
Commissioner Boling expressed that he appreciates the project. The architecture height variations and
color scheme of the project looks good. The project, as a whole, with a mix of units 1, 2, and 3
bedrooms, along with design and amenities is good. It’s appreciated.
Commissioner Boling asked about the bus lane, and if it was going to be included as part of the
dedication on Foothill Blvd.
Joe Gambill confirmed.
Chair Dopp mentioned since he and Commissioner Williams saw this project at Design Review
Committee meeting, they talked about events programming in Wood Partners project in
Chair Dopp asked if they feel comfortable with bocce ball being a good amenity.
Joe Gamble explained they had a similar arrangement in Upland where they had a bocce ball court
and horseshoes, along the entrance of the building, and it worked really well. He said they would be
happy to move it if it’s an issue.
Chair Dopp closed public hearing.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 6 of 9
Draft
Commissioner Morales stated if we were to approve this, they would have Conditions of Approval
(COA) for a Parking Management Plan. He asked staff to explain the parking management plan, and
if there is a parking problem what the City can do to help correct that.
Brian Sandoval, Sr. Civil Engineer, explained the City does not necessarily advocate for a parking
district but residents may petition for a parking district.
Commissioner Morales reiterated that the City has an enforcement tool to make the owner of the
property take corrective action if parking becomes an issue.
Brian Sandona replied not necessarily the enforcement for the owner of the property, but the COA
allows the City to facilitate the initiation of parking district in the event that the residents vote for it.
Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney, stated Commissioner Morales might be asking about parking
management plan and in terms of how the City might enforce should there be an issue.
David Eoff, Senior Planner, stated that if there was an observed violation, we would contact the property
owner and bring to their attention and do our own observations. There could be the ability to do a
parking district/pass, a resident parking permit system. could be signage that could be installed. He
said the important thing is to make sure the parking management is being complied with.
Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, mentioned that the applicant has provided a parking management
plan. Part of the purpose of this condition is to ensure that if Wood Partners was to sell this building to
someone else, there is a condition of approval in this project to assure the parking management plan
would be followed by the new owner.
Chair Dopp asked staff if they feel comfortable that these numbers are going to be correct at the end
of the day. He asked are they confident the number of parking spaces needed is going to greatly
exceed and put impacts on the community.
David Eoff replied that they are comfortable with the project meeting parking. With the parking
management plan and, the COA the city can effectively monitor the site and rectify issues as necessary.
Vice Chair Williams stated she realizes she was a little critical initially, but overall, the project is very
nicely done. It will make a nice addition to the community. She likes the idea of the monthly activities,
but a simple little swing set will make a world of difference.
Commissioner Morales mentioned we had a lot of good comments from the public today. Residents,
Mr. Flores and Mr. Rico. He said if there were not enough parking spaces, there would be no way he
could support it because he feels the City’s responsibility and Commissioners are to avoid harm to the
neighborhood. He believes the traffic improvements the developer will do to fix the traffic problems will
most definitely help. A 6 ft. wall that was already mentioned will protect the views and privacy around
the neighborhood. The parking plan is very crucial. He likes the design of the Paseo with trees and
sitting area; it’s a plus. With the developer and City working together and listening to the resident’s
concern, they created project that that he can support.
Commissioner Boiling expressed his appreciation of staff and their comments regarding the parking
management plan. He said it’s wonderful to have in place but in practice, the critical element is
management of it, which falls upon the property owner. He is glad it will be managed by Wood Partners
after its built and occupied. He hopes they appreciate all comments heard today. They have done a
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 7 of 9
Draft
wonderful job as an organization, addressing concerns previously brought up, and making adjustments
as needed. Working with your residents and commercial tenants, and keeping fingers crossed, they
will succeed. The commercial spaces can be challenging spot, depending on the type of tenants
brought in. He said that the developer should be mindful of that. However, overall, it’s a good project.
Commissioner Daniels mentioned he likes the project and it’s a good location. It is going to give benefit
to the city. He knows they are meeting code requirements but personally would like to see more
commercial to future mixed-use developments. He believes with a project this size there needs to be
more commercial. He said the ball court should be relocated or eliminated. He agrees with Williams
on the swing set. With the number of residents, a swing set would be a real asset to the project.
Overall, it’s a very good project.
Chair Dopp asked Commissioners to come to a consensus on whether they want to actually move the
bocce courts and if the commissioners wanted to move the commercial parking.
Commissioner Boling stated regarding the parking, we should leave it up to the applicant to best
determine service ability of those two commercial units, as well as live/work.
Commissioner Williams expressed she is very comfortable asking to relocate or eliminate bocce ball.
Maybe make it into a nice sitting area with umbrellas and a fireplace. It is concerning to her the ball
going over the wall to Foothill Blvd. It is one of the most crowded streets we have.
Commissioner Boling suggested instead of calling it bocce ball, maybe just an open court type area.
David Eoff mentioned the idea behind it was to provide additional amenity to public service. He said
staff could work with the applicant to be adjusted if so desired by the Commission.
Chair Dopp closed with the following comments: It’s very clear to the applicants and future mixed-use
developments, we are paying close attention to parking. This project meets the need for our
community. It’s very well designed. It’s an attractive development. He is comfortable with the IS/MND.
No further written evidence is needed at this point. The concerns were addressed appropriately.
Motion to adopt by Commissioner Boling, second by Vice Chair Williams, with the proposed change to
Condition of Approval Item #5. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote. Adopting Resolution 22-09.
E. General Business
E 1. Consideration of a Resolution Making Findings of General Plan Conformance for the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD’s Infrastructure Financing Plan, and Making other Findings Related to the
Formation of the EIFD and Actions of the EIFD Public Financing Authority.
Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services and Noah Daniels, Finance Director,
presented Commissioners with a Staff Report. Lori Sassoon mentioned input from Commissioners are
welcome as stakeholders, and their feedback will be taken into consideration.
Commissioner Boling commended staff on taking a very innovative and unique approach to looking at
future financing of projects that would provide an economic benefit to stimulate development within the
city.
Commissioner Daniels asked if there is a deadline for the County to respond if they want to participate.
He asked can they join after it’s formed.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 8 of 9
Draft
Lori Sassoon responded she is having discussion with the County. She is hopeful for their participation.
It would jump start these investments. She said if they were to consent to join in the next several
months, it’s administratively easier, but they can join in a later date.
Chair Dopp asked does the money that gets captured by EIFD take away from the City’s general fund.
Lori Sassoon answered it captures a piece of the growth that would not otherwise happen if it were not
for these investments.
Chair Dopp stated it fits the vision of the General Plan holistically in terms of helping take cars off the
road and prove the value that can potentially be brought from a parking perspective in the City’s Civic
Center district.
Motion to adopt by Commissioner Boling, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0 vote. Adopting Resolution 22-08.
E2.
Study Session on the Development Code Update.
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and
presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Daniels commented that form-based code is a wonderful idea. Staff did a great job presenting
it.
Commissioner Boiling stated form-base helps those that are not in the development business see and
understand the look, the feel, the connectivity of similar situated developments, they all interact. It will help
create an understanding of the economic development impact on some of the projects and what they bring
to the city.
Commissioner Morales mentioned that it is good that we get this done so the developers get moving
on their projects.
Vice Chair Williams agrees with what has been said. It’s simple, this is what we want. She likes the
attitude of it. It’s modern and uplifting. She is in support of it.
Chair Dopp commented that looking at the form base code, he asked is the nonresidential requirement
for mixed use projects the metric we will be using in the future.
Jennifer Nakamura answered yes it is.
With no further discussion, Chair Dopp thanked Jennifer Nakamura and looks forward to seeing this
move forward soon. Report has been received and will be filed.
F. Director Announcements - None
G. Commission Announcements - None
H. Adjournment
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 13, 2022
Page 9 of 9
Draft
Motion by Vice Chair Williams, second by Commissioner Boling to adjourn the meeting, motion carried
unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill
Executive Assistant, Planning Department
Approved:
DATE: April 27, 2022
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager – Community and Economic
Development/Interim Planning Director
INITIATED BY: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
MILLIKEN AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request
to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development comprising of
671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space within the Mixed-Use
Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-
38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action:
• Approve Design Review DRC2021-00120 and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024) through the
adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
• Recommend to City Council the approval of Master Plan DRC2022-00074 through the adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development with 671 apartment units and
20,841 square feet of commercial space on a 17.2-acre site.
BACKGROUND:
The 17.2-acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue and is
zoned Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District. The project site covers approximately three-fourths of the
city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Church Street to the north, and
Foothill Boulevard to the south (Exhibit A - Aerial). The project site is “L” shaped with frontages along Elm
Avenue, Church Street, Milliken Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard, interrupted only by an existing shopping center
located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site slopes from north to south and
is covered by low vegetation.
The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are
as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District
North Multifamily Residential Suburban
Neighborhood Moderate Medium High (MH) Residential District 1
South Commercial/Retail Pad
Buildings/Uses City Corridor High Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC)
District 1,2
Page 2 of 7
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
A. Overview and Site Layout: The project has a proposed density of 39 dwelling units per acre, meeting the
density range of 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre required by the City Corridor High General Plan Designation.
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west split the project into four areas, creating a block
network within the site (Exhibit B – Detailed Site and Landscape Plan). A description of what is proposed for
each block/quadrant as well as the project’s interior streets are outlined below:
i.) Interior Streets
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west are proposed within the project site. The
north-south interior street runs from Church Street and connects to an existing driveway leading to Foothill
Boulevard. The east-west interior street runs from Milliken Avenue and connects to an existing driveway
leading to Elm Avenue. These interior streets are designed with the look, feel, and function of
neighborhood streets to help create an urban environment that is envisioned by the General Plan. The
urban environment is enhanced further with proper building placement along the streets, “on-street”
angled parking, and appropriate landscape features. The interior streets intersect toward the center of
the project, creating a balanced circulation pattern throughout the site.
ii.) Northwest and Northeast
These two blocks are primarily comprised of 3-story walk-up apartments with entrances oriented either
toward the project boundaries abutting public streets or the interior streets within the site. Stand-alone
garages, surface parking areas, and trash enclosures are plotted within the interior of these two blocks,
screening these facilities from public view.
iii.) Southwest
A clubhouse, pool, and dog park occupy this block. The clubhouse contains the leasing office, fitness
center, and multi-purpose room. The clubhouse building is oriented towards the project’s two interior
streets. The southern portion of block abuts a parking area for an existing shopping center.
iv.) Southeast
This block contains a four-story “wrap” building, where residential and commercial units wrap around an
above-ground parking structure. All 20,841 square feet of commercial and restaurant space proposed for
the project is contained within the Foothill Boulevard ground frontage of the wrap building. As such, a
small surface parking lot is proposed west of the wrap building, primarily servicing the commercial spaces.
Building entrances are proposed along all four sides of the building for pedestrians, while vehicle
entrances to the parking structure are available along the west and north elevation. The wrap building
“anchors” the project site with great building placement along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
The wrap building’s setback ranges from 0 feet to 20 feet from the property line along Foothill Boulevard,
creating a significant architectural presence at a primary intersection in the city. The setback range also
allows opportunity for enhanced sidewalk widths and outdoor dining/gathering space to support the
ground-floor commercial and encourage a walkable environment.
B. Architecture: All buildings within the project site are designed in the modern interpretation of the classic
American farmhouse. Design elements that reinforce the farmhouse architecture include batten board siding,
corrugated metal awnings, wood railings, sloped roofs, and a primarily white and gray color scheme.
Shopping Center Industrial Park (IP) District3
East Hospital (part) City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office (MHO)
District 1 Vacant (part)
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community; 2 – north of Foothill Boulevard; 3 – south of Foothill Boulevard
Page 3 of 7
Contemporary architectural elements such as horizontal wood siding, stucco, flat roofs, large windows, and
horizontal metal beams are also incorporated into the buildings, giving the farmhouse design a modern
appearance. All building materials are carried to all elevations. Horizontal articulation along the building
planes as well as vertical articulation on rooflines breaks down the building massing and creates architectural
interest (Exhibit C – Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings).
The ground floor commercial frontages on the south side of the wrap building (facing Foothill Boulevard) are
treated with a variety of architectural elements that blend the farmhouse and modern styles together (Exhibit
D – Partial Foothill Elevation). Elements such as corrugated metal awnings and eyebrow canopies placed at
different heights and distances from the curb, further enhance the overall architecture by creating visual
interest and variation at the storefronts. Additionally, the commercial space is designed with a ceiling height
of roughly 16 feet to accommodate a range of commercial uses, as required by the General Plan.
C. Unit Composition and Floor Plans: All residential units will be housed in either 3-story walk-ups on the
northeast and northwest portions of the site, or within the 4-story wrap building at the site’s southeast corner.
A total of 323 and 348 units will be located within the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building,
respectively, with the project providing a grand total of 671 apartments. Studios range in size from 488 to
659 square feet, while 1-bedroom units range from 634 to 1,004 square feet. 2-bedroom units range from
933 to 1,261 square feet. Additionally, 20,841 square feet of ground floor commercial space is located along
the 4-story wrap building’s Foothill Boulevard frontage. The table below summarizes the unit composition for
both the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building.
UNIT SUMMARY
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
-Studio 84 units 33 units 117 units
-1 Bedroom 153 units 194 units 347 units
-2 Bedroom 86 units 121 units 207 units
TOTAL 323 units 348 units 671 units
Commercial
-Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
D. Recreation Amenities: The project provides 10 active residential amenities. Resident amenities include two
pool/spa areas, an indoor gym, a community multi-purpose room with kitchen, an enclosed dog park with
separate areas for small and large dogs, an observation deck, outdoor exercise area, outdoor gaming area,
eight BBQ grill areas, and an enclosed children’s play area (Exhibit E – Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity
Details).
E. Fencing and Access: Most of the project site is ungated and is therefore publicly accessible by foot or by
car. Vehicular entrances and sidewalks to the project’s two interior streets from Church Street, Foothill
Boulevard, Elm Avenue, and Milliken Avenue are ungated. There are three pedestrian gates/fences that
control access to the two clubhouse/pool areas and the fitness courtyard within the wrap building. The only
vehicular gate on the property is utilized to separate the upper levels of the wrap building parking structure
that is designated for residents from the first story of the parking structure that is primarily dedicated to
commercial uses (Exhibit F – Wall and Fence Plan).
F. Master Plan and Proposed Development Standards: One of the objectives of a Master Plan is to allow for
the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to allow the development of an
exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of
existing development standards. The project includes a Master Plan application (Master Plan 2022-00074)
Page 4 of 7
which proposes a site-specific set of development standards (Exhibit G – Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan).
These standards are meant to accommodate a well-balanced, functional, and highly walkable public realm
within and around the project. The master plan is also intended to enable the development of two primary
building types (3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building). The table below lists the development
standards proposed with Master Plan Master Plan 2022-00074.
PROPOSED SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
Density (dwelling units/acre) 36 DU/AC
Front Setback1 - Foothill Boulevard 0’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Milliken Avenue 12’ to 20’
Front Setback1 – Church Street 15’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Elm Avenue 10’ to 15’
Front Setback1 - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’
Interior Setback
(West property line facing adjacent shopping center) 124’
Interior Setback
(South property line facing adjacent shopping center) 56’
Distance Between Buildings Per Building Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit (100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter 17.64 (see below)
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is generally at the inside edge of the adjacent sidewalk
(public right-of-way)
G. Walkability: The project provides a complete pedestrian network, with sidewalks provided on both sides of
all interior streets and along the project perimeter. Sidewalks along the interior streets are proposed to be 5
feet in width, while sidewalks along the project perimeter adjacent to public streets are 8 to 10 feet wide,
allowing adequate space for pedestrian activity (Exhibit H – Walkway Circulation Plan). The proposed
pedestrian routes are dotted with linear parks, seating areas, and landscaping, and uninterrupted by blank
expanses or parking lots, resulting in an attractive walking environment. All front facades and building
entrances are oriented towards streets/sidewalks, helping create a safe and active streetscape.
H. Parking: The project’s master plan is designed to mirror the City’s current parking requirements as described
in Section 17.64 of the Development Code. Based on all proposed uses on site, the project is required to
provide 1,468 parking stalls, 671 of which are required to be in a garage or carport. Required parking includes
tenant and visitor parking for the residential portion of the project, as well as parking for all commercial
spaces. The project provides 1,468 parking stalls, 942 of which are covered, meeting the parking requirement
(Exhibit I – Parking Plan). In order to ensure that on-site parking is properly managed, the applicant has
provided a Parking Management Plan (Exhibit J – Parking Management Plan). This Parking Management
Plan outlines how residential, guest, and commercial parking spaces are assigned, and details enforcement
actions that apartment management can take in response to any potential parking violations. The following
parking analysis table provides a breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces on-site.
PARKING ANALYSIS
Number
of Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Page 5 of 7
Multi-Family unit
(studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 152
Multi-family unit
(One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit
(Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34
Commercial
(Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
I. Tentative Map: The project includes the subdivision of the project site into four (4) numbered lots for
condominium purposes, for the development of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space
(Exhibit K – Tentative Map 20120). Each lot will help facilitate construction, circulation, and other components
of the project.
J. Public Art: This project is required to provide public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development
Code. Based on the number of residential units and commercial square footage for this project, the total art
value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $524,091. A condition has been included pursuant to the
Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy.
K. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Williams, Morales)
on March 15, 2022. The Committee recommended approval of the project to the full Planning Commission.
This is reflected in the in the Design Review Committee Comments (Exhibit L – DRC Minutes dated March
15, 2022).
L. General Plan Consistency: The General Plan designations are centered around four primary components:
Land Use and Development Intensity, Built Form and Character, Access and Connectivity, and Parks and
Open Space. The project is located in the Corridor High designation of the General Plan, which is intended
to provide for medium to high intensity developments along Foothill Boulevard that include a range of
amenities, conveniences, housing options, and more at the edges of many existing and future
neighborhoods.
The project has been well-designed to align with the Corridor High designation. The project proposes a
density of 39 units per acre, which falls within the expected range of the Corridor High designation of 36-60
units per acre. The proposed site plan includes proper building placement near the sidewalks with proper
orientation to exterior or interior streets to accommodate active frontages and ground floor uses. The strategic
placement of the buildings forms strong circulation patterns and streetscapes, helping create the desired
urban character of the Corridor. The project site also has the benefit of street frontage on four sides and has
taken advantage of those frontages to provide easy access and strong connectivity. The site is divided into
quadrants, using privately owned streets to create walkable blocks in and throughout the project site. While
the streets are privately owned, they will be public accessible and designed to look, feel, and function like
public streets, as envisioned by the General Plan.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan (GPU) and certified
a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the
Page 6 of 7
GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential
development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development
at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a
Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a
Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide
mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental
impacts on a comprehensive scale.
Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the
project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the
imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared
for the project solely on the basis of that impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General
Plan for “City Corridor – High” land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722
multi-family residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and would be
consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the
proposed project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance
Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope
of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed,
and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a
level of less than significant.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of
the project site. To date, no written correspondence, phone calls, or in person inquiries have been received
regarding the project notifications.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
It is the City Council’s vision to make Foothill Boulevard the City’s mixed-use corridor, featuring a variety of urban
developments that will enable a vibrant, walkable neighborhood that residents, workers, and visitors can enjoy.
The proposed mixed-use development fits in this vision by developing a block of this mixed-use corridor.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Aerial
Exhibit B - Detailed Site and Landscape Plan
Exhibit C - Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings
Exhibit D - Partial Foothill Elevation
Exhibit E - Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity Details
Exhibit F - Wall and Fence Plan
Exhibit G - Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan
Exhibit H - Walkway Circulation Plan
Exhibit I - Parking Plan
Exhibit J - Parking Management Plan
Exhibit K - Tentative Map 20120
Exhibit L - Draft DRC Minutes dated March 15, 2022
Exhibit M - CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
Page 7 of 7
Exhibit N - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-12 TTM Harvest
Exhibit O - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-11 DR Harvest
Exhibit P - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-10 MP Harvest
Exhibit Q - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit R - Statement of Agreement
CHURCH STREETFOOTHILL BOULEVARDELM STREET
MILLIKENAVENUE600'
6
0
0
'600'600'600'BASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KP
KPKPKPKPKP GAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKP
UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BASE
POIN
T
KPKPKP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKP
KPKP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP KPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18R UP18RS
S/CBASEPOINT
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEGAR. 06MPOEKP
KPKPELECTRICALKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP KPKP
UP18RFIRERISER
UP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18
R
UP18
R
SS/CBASEPOINTELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEGAR. 06MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPKP
UP18RFIRERISER
UP18
R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18RUP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP KP
KPKPKPKPUP18RUP18
R
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RBASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KPKPKPKPKPKPGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKPKPKPKP UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINT KP KP KP KPUP18R KP KP KP
BASEPOINT
BASEPOINT
GAR. 01 / A2KPKP KPKPKPKPGAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT KPKPKPKPUP18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINTKPKP
KPKPUP18RKPKPKPBASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOIN
T
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18
R
KP
KP
KP222PRINTER222PRINTER22PRINTER22PRINTER22KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KPKPKPUP18
R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)KPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP KP KP KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.5' DIA.3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UP30"2449 30"244930"2449
30"24 4930"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49 30"2449
30"24494.8%7.2%30"24
49 30"244908.67 TC08.00 FLIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJANUARY 10, 202217.29 AC. GROSS TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2012017.29 AC. NETAPN: 1077-422-51,52,54,55 AND 1090-121-284 NUMBERED LOTS(198 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)SITE UTILIZATION MAP SUM-01WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEMADOLE&ASSOCIATES, INC.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAHARVEST AT TERRA VISTADATE: JANUARY 10, 2022JOB NO. 126-2647CIVIL ENGINEEROWNER/DEVELOPERMADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730CONTACT: MARK BERTONE(909) 481-6322 ext. 120Email: mbertone@madoleinc.comAO ARCHITECTS144 NORTH ORANGE STORANGE, CA 92866CONTACT: IOANNA MAGIATI (714) 639-9860Email:ioannam@aoarchitects.com1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVEUPLAND, CA. 91786CONTACT: BRIAN JACOBSON(909) 579-1214 OFFICEEmail: Brian.Jacobson@lewismc.comARCHITECTSITESCAPES, INC.3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVECOSTA MESA, CA. 92626CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS(949) 644-9370Email: rpolhamus@sitescapes.netLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLCNTSVICINITY MAPMILLIKEN CHURCHMAYTEN PROJECT LOCATIONELM
FOOTHILLSTREETAVENUE
AVENUEEUCALYPTUSSTREET
AVENUEBOULEVARDSPRUCE
AVENUE
J:\126-2647\tentative\SUM.dwg, 1/10/2022 10:59:04 AM, dmartinezExhibit A
22'-0"FITNESSCO-WORKBREEZEWAYENTRYFITNESSELECTRICAL\MPOELEASINGENTRY23'-6"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE 124789612'-1"
T.O. PLATECO-WORKENTERTAINMENTENTERTAINMENTLEASING20'-3"
23'-6 1/2"
22'-0"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMEN5'-0"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA1.0CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATIONS1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'EAST ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATIONWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WEST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATIONWESTSOUTH EASTNORTHExhibit C
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMEN5'-0"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.A1.1CLUBHOUSE - RENDERINGSWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833FITNESS CORNER4LEASING CORNER2COVERED WALKWAYP
4
1ENTRYP3P2P1
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMENPORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.POOL EQUIP.10'-0" X 15'-0"WCDOG WASHWCSHOWERSA1.2CLUBHOUSE - GROUND FLOOR PLAN NORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'
A1.3CLUBHOUSE - ROOF PLAN NORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'
± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"123457968629'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOFUP18RSSSKP
KP
KP
KPKPKPUP18R S
FIRERISERKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.0ELEVATIONS - 20 PLEXLEFTFRONTRIGHTREARFRONT ELEVATION1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'P2P1REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONFRONTREARWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPLOCATION OF ART**
A3S1A2S2488 SF682 SF615 SF824 SFLEVEL 1121'-0"64'-1"MPOE ELECTRIALFIRERISER
UP18RSS/CSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE KPKPKPELECTRICAL
KPKPKPUP18RFIRERISERKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"
26'-11"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"5'-0"10'-10"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"15'-10"14'-2"9'-3"10'-5"9'-3"19'-5"121'-0"B1A3A3S1A2S2A1488 SF824 SFLEVEL 2824 SF615 SF682 SFB11,008 SF744 SFB11,008 SFSSS/CSSSUP18RDN18RUP18RDN18R4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT63'-9"
12'-0"11'-0"12'-2"17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"8'-0"11'-11"9'-6"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"
8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"
26'-11"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"5'-0"10'-10"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"15'-10"14'-2"9'-3"10'-5"9'-3"19'-5"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'A2.1 BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEXWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
B1B1A3A3S1A2S2A11,008 SFLEVEL 3B1488 SF824 SF824 SF615 SF682 SF1,008 SF744 SFSDN18RSS/CSSSDN18R3:12PER FOOT3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT 121'-0"63'-9"122'-4"66'-2"ROOF3:12PER FOOT3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT1'-0"TYP.1/4:12PER FOOT, TYP.10'-6"
12'-3"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"1'-0"TYP.1/4:12PER FOOT, TYP.HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.2BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
UP18RSSSSKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RS
SDS/CFIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"123457896± 41'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 41'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 37'-10" TOTOP OF ROOF± 40'-5" TOTOP OF ROOF± 42'-0" TOTOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.3ELEVATIONS - 23 PLEX1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'LEFTFRONTRIGHTREARP2P1FRONT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONFRONTREARWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPLOCATION OF ART**
138'-0"UP18RSSKPKPKPELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE KPKPKPELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
61'-3"
8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"5'-0"10'-10"138'-6"SSSSSUP18RDN18RUP18RDN18R3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT63'-9"
10'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"6'-5"9'-4"5'-0"10'-10"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.4 BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
138'-6"DN18RDN18RSSSSS3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT63'-9"140'-6"3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
10'-0"7:12SLOPE, TYP.1'-0"TYP.10'-0"2'-0"7'-2"6'-0"
1'-0"
TYP.
2'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"10'-0"4'-6"
66'-2"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.5BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
SSSSSSUP18RUP18RS
S
SD S/CSKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"1234567896± 40'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 37'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 40'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 37'-3" TOTOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.6ELEVATIONS - 37 PLEX1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'LEFTFRONTRIGHTREARP2P1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FRONTREARFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION3-STORY WALK-UP
210'-6"SSSELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE ELECTRICALUP18R
UP18RSKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT61'-3"9'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"8'-9"4'-9"6'-4"9'-4"13'-0"11'-0"12'-2"22'-6"
7'-8"9'-7"11'-6"14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"210'-6"SSSSSSSSUP18RDN18RSUP18RDN18R3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT63'-9"9'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"8'-9"4'-9"6'-4"9'-4"13'-0"11'-0"22'-6"
7'-8"9'-7"11'-6"14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"
7'-0"
8'-8"11'-0"4'-1"4'-3"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"
12'-0"11'-0"12'-2"17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"8'-0"11'-11"9'-6"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.7BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
210'-6"DN18RSSSSSSSSSDN18RS3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT63'-9"212'-6"3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT7'-6"
17'-6"7'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"1'-0"
TYP.
1'-0"TYP.15'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"T.O.P.=+5'-9"66'-1"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.8BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
UNIT S1 (FLOORS 1-3 ADA)STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 488 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.21'-3"36'-2"LIVINGROOM11'-6"x8'-7"FLEXDININGKITCHENBATHW/DSLEEPING9'-2"x8'-6"PATIO11'-6"x6'-11"ENTRY6'-11"REFPCB36"x60" Q4'-3"CBCBUNIT A2 (FLOORS 1-3 - ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 682 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 73 SQ. FT.23'-5"36'-2"BEDROOM11'-6"x11'LIVINGROOM11'-0"x16'-6"PATIO11'-0"x7'-4"KITCHENW/DLBATHENTRYCB
7'-4"36"x 60" PREFDININGROOM5'-2"QUNIT A1 (UPPER FLOORS - NON-ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 744 SQ. FT.BALCONY : 44 SQ. FT.32'-6"24'-10"LIVINGROOM12'-2"x15'-2"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"BALCONY8'-0"x5-4"FLEX8'-0"x8'-4"ENTRYBATHW.I.C.KITCHENREFPDKW36"x60" 5MdfSHLVS
FURNITURELIVINGROOM11'-8"x15'-2"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-6"BALCONY7'-10"x5'-2"KITCHENFLEXDINING8'-0"x8'-4"ENTRYW.I.C.PUNIT B1 (UPPER FLOORS NON-ADA)2 BDRM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1008 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 53 SQ. FT.43'-4"24'-10"DBATHBATHREFW.I.C.Q36" x 60"KW36" x 60"5MdfSHLVSBUILT-INISLANDENTRYCBCBKITCHEN
PLIVINGROOM12'-2"x12'-6"PATIO11'-4"x6'-6"BEDROOM11'-6"x13'-0"BATHW.I.C.W/DBATHBEDROOM11'-0"x12'-6"UNIT B2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)2 BDRM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,128 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 92 SQ. FT.35'-10"36'-8"DININGROOM36" x 60"LLREFW.I.CBUILD OUTON FIRSTFLOOR ONLYKQBUILT-IN
ISLAND
36" x 60"UNIT S2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 615 SQ. FT.17'-0"36'-2"LIVINGROOM13'-8"x15'-8"BATHENTRYW/DSLEEPING8'-10"x9'-4"CLOSET KITCHENREFPLINENQ3'-6"36"x60" UNIT A3 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 824 SQ. FT.PATIO : 126 SQ. FT.24'-4"40'-6"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"PATIO12'-1"x10'-5"KITCHENLIVINGROOM13'-6"x12'-3"DININGROOMW.I.C.ENTRYREFK23'-4"LPCOATSBATHW/D L36"x60" CBCB BUILT-INDESKA3.0UNIT PLANS3/16"=1'-0"4' 8' 16'0 2'1'3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP KP KP
KP
KP KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPUP
18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
22
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
22
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R SS/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"2449
30"2449
4.8%7.2%
30"24
49
30"2449F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.03-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF CHURCH AND ELMELM AVENUE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPUP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
22
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
SS/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
4930"2449
4.8%7.2%
30"24
49
30"2449F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.13-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CHURCH STREET ENTRYCHURCH STREET
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPUP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
22
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
SS/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
4930"2449
4.8%7.2%
30"24
49
30"2449F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.C H
U
R
C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.23-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND CHURCHMILLIKEN AVENUE
1299'-1"T.O. PLATE9'-1"T.O. PLATE±20'-9"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±20'-9"T.O. ROOF±20'-9"T.O. ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONA5.0ELEVATION G-11/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STAND ALONE GARAGELOCATION OF ART**
9±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE12±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONA5.1ELEVATION G-2WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGE
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE912±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.2ELEVATION G-3WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION
1299±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.3ELEVATION G-4WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE2911. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.4ELEVATION G-5WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE29±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE11. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.5ELEVATION G-6WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION
9'-1"T.O. PLATE129'-1"T.O. PLATE±13'-8"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±13'-8"T.O. ROOF±13'-8"T.O. ROOF91. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.6ELEVATION G-7WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLOCATION OF ART**
12345678963RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE15'-0"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 54'-2"TOP OF ROOF± 57'-3" TOT.O. FIN1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1SOUTH ELEVATION2SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SE CORNER PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831WRAPB2.0ELEVATION - SOUTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'23
12456789633RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE15'-0"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 54'-2"TOP OF ROOF± 57'-3" TOT.O. FIN1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.1ELEVATION - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'1SOUTH ELEVATION2SOUTH ELEVATION2MATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH
ROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGE123456789
3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"10'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"12'-1"LOUNGET.O. PLATE± 51'-10"TOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1EAST ELEVATION1322NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3EAST PERSPECTIVEROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.2ELEVATION - EAST1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'
123457891. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE
ROOF L
O
UN
G
E
ROOF L
O
UN
G
E6
3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"10'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"12'-1"LOUNGET.O. PLATE± 51'-10"TOP OF ROOFWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.3ELEVATION - EAST ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'1EAST ELEVATION2EAST ELEVATION2MATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH1
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 51'-0"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"10'-11"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 53'-4"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1NORTH ELEVATION2NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132ROOF LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.4ELEVATION - NORTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'
1234567891. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 51'-0"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"10'-11"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 53'-4"TOP OF PARAPETWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831WRAPB2.5ELEVATION - NORTH ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'21NORTH ELEVATION2NORTH ELEVATIONMATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 52'-3"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 57'-3"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEB2.6 ELEVATIONS - WEST1WEST ELEVATION2NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132RESIDENT'S LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGERESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAP1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'
12456781. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE393RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 52'-3"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 57'-3"TOP OF PARAPETB2.7 ELEVATIONS - WEST1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAP1NORTH ELEVATION2NORTH ELEVATIONMATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'2
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKPKPKPELECTRICAL UP18RFIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/CJ
SS/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP KP
UP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/C
JSS/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KPKPKP KP
KPELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KPELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
SS/C
SSPATIO
JSS/CSPATIO
J
SS/C
KPKPKPKPKPKP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
MPOE
FIRE RIS
E
R
KPKPKPKP UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
M
A
IN
S
ER
V
IC
E
ELECTR
I
CA
L
S
SD
S/C
S
REF 3DP CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIOJSS/CS
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RKPKPKP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALS SDS/C
SREF3DPCB SDS/CS
J
S S/C
S
S
PATIO
J SS/C
S
PATIOJ
SS/C
KP
KP KPKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP KPKPUP18R KPKPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALSSDS/CS
REF3DPCB
SDS/CS
J
SS/C
SSPATIOJS
S/C
S
PATIO JS
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SDS/C
S REF3DP
CBSD S/C
S22
2
PRINTER
222
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER22
PRINTER2
2BREEZW
AYMPOE/IT
JAN
I
TORMAINT
ENA
NC
E/STORAGE
RESTR
OOM
MEN
WOMENELEC
.
ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPRTRTMAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
SS/C
JSS/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RS
SD S/C
FIRERISERKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-
0"
X
58
'-
6"YOGA30'-0" X
17
'
-0
"CO-WORK20'-6" X
27
'
-4
"LEASING25'-0" X
32
'
-0
"
RESTR
OOMOFFICE
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-0
"OFFICE11'-0"
X
1
1
'-
0
"OFFICE
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-0
"OFFICE11'-0"
X
1
1
'-
0
"BREAK RM
.11'-0" X
1
6
'
-0
"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X
23
'
-0
"CONF.
17'-0"
X
13
'
-
6"CONF
.
10'-0
"
X
13
'
-6
"PORCH19'-0" X
22
'
-0
"#####
##
#
##
##
######
##
##
##
#######
##
##
##
##
####
##
#
##
##
##POOL EQU
IP
.
10'-3"
X
15
'
-
0"
WC
WCSHOWE
RS MAIL UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENAN
T
TRA
SHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTEN
AN
TTRASHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOMCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGTURNAROUNDGGG1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UPA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"24
49
B4B3A4B3 ABOVEA4A5A1B1A330"2449
30"2449A3
A5A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRYA4A3A430"24 49
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE30"24
49 PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORRIDOR SERVICE CORRIDOR
OPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49
A330"24
49
A3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3B3 ABOVE20PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY#############LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17B39LVLV30"2449A3
A118A3 ABO
VE
A330"24
49POOLEQUIPMENTMAIL& PARCELS###########MEN
WOM
EN
B3
ABO
VE
B3ALT 2B3ALT 1A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 2B4A5ALT 1LVA8T.B.D34 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS 14 18
134.8%7.2%
16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"24
49 ELECT. ROOMB
3
A330"24
49ELECT. ROOM32BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SF123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.CHURCH ST
.TMAINT.EXISTINGTERRA VISTA COMMONSRETAIL CENTERN.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATIONB-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXG-76-GARAGESG-628-GARAGESG-530-GARAGESG-422-GARAGESG-320-GARAGESG-224-GARAGESG-118-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDB-520-PLEXMAINT.WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283B2.8WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS51627348VIEW 1 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 350' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 2 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 340' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 3 "LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVE AND FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 160' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 4 " LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 170' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKPKPKPELECTRICAL UP18RFIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/CJ
SS/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP KP
UP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/C
JSS/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KPKPKP KP
KPELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KPELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
SS/C
SSPATIO
JSS/CSPATIO
J
SS/C
KPKPKPKPKPKP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
MPOE
FIRE RIS
E
R
KPKPKPKP UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
M
A
IN
S
ER
V
IC
E
ELECTR
I
CA
L
S
SD
S/C
S
REF 3DP CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIOJSS/CS
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RKPKPKP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALS SDS/C
SREF3DPCB SDS/CS
J
S S/C
S
S
PATIO
J SS/C
S
PATIOJ
SS/C
KP
KP KPKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP KPKPUP18R KPKPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALSSDS/CS
REF3DPCB
SDS/CS
J
SS/C
SSPATIOJS
S/C
S
PATIO JS
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SDS/C
S REF3DP
CBSD S/C
S2
2
2
PRINTER
222
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER22
PRINTER2
2BREEZW
AYMPOE/IT
JAN
I
TORMAINT
ENA
NC
E/STORAGE
RESTR
OOM
MEN
WOMENELEC
.
ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPRTRTMAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
SS/C
JSS/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RS
SD S/C
FIRERISERKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-
0"
X
58
'-
6"YOGA30'-0" X
17
'
-0
"CO-WORK20'-6" X
27
'
-4
"LEASING25'-0" X
32
'
-0
"
RESTR
OOMOFFICE
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-0
"OFFICE11'-0"
X
1
1
'-
0
"OFFICE
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-0
"OFFICE11'-0"
X
1
1
'-
0
"BREAK RM
.11'-0" X
1
6
'
-0
"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X
23
'
-0
"CONF.
17'-0"
X
13
'
-
6"CONF
.
10'-0
"
X
13
'
-6
"PORCH19'-0" X
22
'
-0
"#####
##
#
##
##
######
##
##
##
#######
##
##
##
##
####
##
#
##
##
##POOL EQU
IP
.
10'-3"
X
15
'
-
0"
WC
WCSHOWE
RS MAIL UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENAN
T
TRA
SHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTEN
AN
TTRASHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOMCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGTURNAROUNDGGG1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UPA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"24
49
B4B3A4B3 ABOVEA4A5A1B1A330"2449
30"2449A3
A5A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRYA4A3A430"24 49
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE30"24
49 PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORRIDOR SERVICE CORRIDOR
OPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49
A330"24
49
A3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3B3 ABOVE20PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY#############LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17B39LVLV30"2449A3
A118A3 ABO
VE
A330"24
49POOLEQUIPMENTMAIL& PARCELS###########MEN
WOM
EN
B3
ABO
VE
B3ALT 2B3ALT 1A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 2B4A5ALT 1LVA8T.B.D34 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS 14 18
134.8%7.2%
16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"24
49 ELECT. ROOMB
3
A330"24
49ELECT. ROOM32BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SF123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.CHURCH ST
.TMAINT.EXISTINGTERRA VISTA COMMONSRETAIL CENTERN.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATIONB-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXG-76-GARAGESG-628-GARAGESG-530-GARAGESG-422-GARAGESG-320-GARAGESG-224-GARAGESG-118-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDB-520-PLEXMAINT.WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-28351627348VIEW 5 "LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 580' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 6 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 470' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 8 "LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 690' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 7 " LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 420' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".EXISTING TERRA VISTACOMMONS BUILDINGEXISTING McDONALD'SRESTAURANTB2.9WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS
48"22"BREEZWAY5'-0"ELECTRICALMPOEKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18RSS
SSKP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL M
A
I
N
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RS
S
D
S
/
C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKPSSSSSSUP18RUP18RS40'-6"SSDS/C SKP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
KPSSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKPKPKPELECTRICALUP18RSKPKPKP4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT
43444647UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANTTRASHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANTTRASHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC1234567891011121415161718192021222324252930313233343536373839404142454849 50 51 52 53 54 55565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788899091929395969798991001011021031041051061071081091101111121131141151161171181191201211221231243.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOMCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGCGGTURNAROUNDCGGUPTURNAROUNDA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"2449B4B3A4B3 ABOVE14'-6"TTA414'-6"A5A1B1A330"244930"2449A3A511'-5"A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRY46'-3"91'-3"114'-3"A4A3A430"2449
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE30"24
49PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORRIDORSERVICE CORRIDOROPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49A330"24
49A3B3B1A5A5A5A1 ABOVEB3B3B3 ABOVESTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"20STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY1,077 SQ. FT.LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"MILLIKEN AVE.FOOTHILL BLVD.B3492'-8"
519'-7"
65'-3"123'44'-10"110'101'-7"74'-11"189'-9"221'-10"410'-2"58'-5"
27'-4"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
4
'-8
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 4
'-8"STOR.U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-6"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 3
'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'-6
"30"2449A3
28'-2"12'-4"A119'-10"19'-10"26'19'-10"19'-10"26'22'-10"12'-4"16'-2"27'-3"26'-9"30'25'14'-9"14'-1"13'-2"11'-6"17'-4"12'-5"13'15'-11"26'15'-5"29'-3"19'30'-4"31'-2"32'-2"19'187'
6'A3 ABOVEA37'30"2449POOLEQUIPMENTSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"7'MAIL& PARCELS966 SQ. FT.7'7'7'7'6'7'MENWOMENSTOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"B3 ABOVE
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"7'7'46'-2"46'-2"47'100'38'-8"58'-6"61'-3"75'24'-5"49'-8"49'-8"B3ALT 2B3ALT 17'7'A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 27'7'B4A5ALT 1STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"LVA8T.B.D48"22"BREEZWAY5'-0"33 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS12345678910111213141617181920212223242526272830313233 14 18 134.8%7.2% 16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"
24
49ELECT. ROOMB3A330"2449ELECT. ROOMSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
3
'
-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"1529ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE KP KP KPKPKPKP ELECTRICAL PKPKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18RSS/CJSS/CSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKPKPKPELECTRICALKPKPKPKPUP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18RK
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPELECTRICAL M
A
I
N
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE RISER
KPJSS/C
SSPATIOJSS/CSPATIO JSS/C KPKPKPKPKPKPELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER KPKPKPKP
UP18RKP KP KP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MA
I
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
ELECTRICAL
SSDS/C
S REF3DPCBSDS/CS222PRINTER222PRINTER 22PRINTER22PRINTER22 BREEZWAYMPOE/ITJANITORMAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMMENWOMENELEC.ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"LEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"RESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"####################################################WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSW W W WW
W
W
W
S
SWWW WWWWSSSS S S S WSSSSSSSSSS
WWF O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E . I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .S S S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W WSS SSSSW WWWWW71110G-711'-2"
M I7'26'28'-9"12'-9"19'-10"26'19'-10"19'26'23'-2"24'1161762626'32'-4"37'-11"19'-10"26'17'19'-10"26'19'-10"12'-8"26'-2"26'-9"15'-2"19'-2"15'-2"13'19'-10"26'19'-10"6'-6"17'-4"17'15'-6"3'
14'-5"
22'-6"22'-5"25'-4"30'21'-10"14'-10"17'-4"11'-1"13'-1"17'-5"14'-8"1411'-3"15'-9"17'-4"12'-4"11'-6"13'26'-10"26'22'-7"16'-1"1112423514'-6"28'-3"32'30'-4"331'-6"32'-6"1519'26'19'19'26'19'26'91222410'-3"422'-7"11'-4"8'-4"'5'5'1413'3'3'26'6'20'-2"26'5'-8"25'7B-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXG-76-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDMAINT.24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.10BUILDING PLANWRAPNORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283GROUND LEVELSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSFIRE WALLWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTPATH OF TRAVELR-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAXSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CFEXIT PATH
UPUP
5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUPA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A511'A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"RESIDENTIAL149 STALLSA4B3A4OPEN
OPENOPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"24
49A330"24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDLVSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
4
'-8
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 4
'-8"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA16'STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4B3ALT 1A5ALT 17'B3B3B4ALT 17'B3ALT 2A5ALT 27'7'7'A83'-2 15/16" 28 28 28 28LVSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.11BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283SECOND LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
UPUP
UP5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A511'A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"A4B3A4OPEN
OPENOPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"2449A330"24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDLVSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 4
'-8"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA16'STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32B3ALT 1A5ALT 1STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"7'B3B3LVB4ALT 17'B3ALT 2A5ALT 27'7'7'A8 38 38 38RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS30"24
49A3B324'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTHWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283B2.12BUILDING PLANTHIRD LEVEL1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLPATH OF TRAVELR-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAXSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
UPUP
5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRGGUPA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A5A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"A4B3A4OPEN
OPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"2449A330"
24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
4
'-8
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 4
'-8"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA1STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4B3ALT 1A5ALT 17'B3B37'A5ALT 27'7'7'ROOF DECK@4TH LEVEL1,788 SQ. FT.LVA8 48 48 48RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS30"
24
49A3B3LVSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"11'OPEN24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.13BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FOURTH LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
ROOFTOPMECHANICALEQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROMEXTERIOR VIEW BYPERIMETER PARAPETWALLS (TYP.)ROOF ACCESS STAIRROOF ACCESS STAIRUPUP
UPTURNAROUND4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"
UP RR R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R R RR R R R R7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE 58 58 58RESIDENTIAL156 STALLSAC UNIT24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.14BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FIFTH LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENINGWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"TURNAROUNDUP
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRESIDENTIAL50 STALLS24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"± 53'-11"TOP OFPARKINGSTRUCTURE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"3'-6"5TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.4TH STORYT.O. PLATE5'-6"LINE OF SIGHTNORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.15BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283ROOF LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDSECTION
REF34'-0"20'-0"BEDROOM10'-2" X 10'-6"BATHUNIT A11 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 634 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 56 SQ. FT.WICLIVING10'-4" X 12'-9"BALCONY8'-6" X 6'-6"KITCHEN9'-10" X 11'-8"ENTRYQDWW/DP36" x 60"LBUILT-INDESK36" HCBCB3S5 MDF SH.DWKITCHEN8'-0" X 15'-0"ENTRYW/DLIVING12'-10" X 16'-2"BALCONY11'-0" X 5'-6"BEDROOM11'-2" X 12'-0"REFPBATHLUNIT A31 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 759 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.25'-0"33'-0"WIC30"2449
LBUILT-INDESKKOCCURS UNDER 2 BEDROOMCBCB
36"x60" BUILT-INISLAND3S37'-11"29'-4"BALCONY9'-0" X 6'-2"BATHLIVING11'-11" X 12'-11"WICBEDROOM11'-0" X 12'-6"REFKITCHEN8'-5" X 14'-0"DWENTRY5 SHELVESW/DBUILT-INDESKUNIT A41 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 751 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 68 SQ. FT.KPUNDER CABINET LIGHT36"x60" CBCBCOUNTERHEIGHTCABINETBUILT-INISLANDOPENING FOR LIGHTCOUNTER HT BASE CABUNDER CAB LIGHT3SDWKITCHEN10'-0" X 14'-0"W/D27'-0"34'-0"ENTRYBEDROOM11'-2" X 12'-0"LIVING11'-0" X 13'-8"BALCONY11'-0" X 6'-2"FLEX/OFFICE12'-4" X 7'-8"BATHREFWICUNIT A51 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 859 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 66 SQ. FT.DROP ZONEPCB CB K36"x60" BUILT-INISLANDFURNITURE
FURNITUREDWBATHCBCBPM. BATHM. BEDROOM11'-0" X 12'-0"WICLENTRYW/DLIVING11'-7" X 13'-0"BEDROOM 210'-4" X 12'-0"KITCHEN11'-8" X 9'-6"BALCONY5'-10" X 8'-4"29'-10"UNIT B1 (ADA)2 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 993 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 44 SQ. FT.FURNITURE44'-1"WICQREFQ36"x60" 36"x60" WORKSPACEFURNITURE3SCB
KITCHEN8'-0" X 15'-0"M. BATHWICM. BEDROOM11'-0" X 15'-0"LUNIT B32 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,133 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.36'-4"33'-0"DWCBENTRYD/WLIVING12'-10" X 15'-9"BALCONY11'-0" X 5'-6"BEDROOM 211'-2" X 12'-0"REFPBATH 2WICBUILT-INDESKDROP ZONE
STO.WORKSPACEKQL36"x60" 36"x60" BUILT-INISLANDFURNITURE3SLCOAT CLOSETCBCBDWREFPUNIT A61 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1.5 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1004 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.STORAGE : -ENTRYLIVING11'-10" X 15'-0"DWREPOSITIONABLEISLANDWREFBEDROOM14'-0" X 11'-2"BALCONY11'-0" X 6'-2"DININGLENTRYBEDROOM12'-0" X 12'-3"D/WLIVING11'-0" X 12'-0"FLEX/DININGFLEX/OFFICE9'-9" X 9'-6"UNIT S1STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 659 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 76 SQ. FT.STORAGE : -36'-10"50'-0"BATHBALCONY12'-0" X 6'-2"RETAILSHAFTWICBATHPDROP ZONE3'-10"KQDCBCBPP36"x60" P36"x60" FURNITUREFURNITUREFURNITUREW/D3SREFCBPCBM. BEDROOM 13'-0" X 12'-0"DINING9'-11" X 10'-6"LIVING14'-2" X 12'-0"BEDROOM 212'-0" X 11'-0"36'-0"ENTRYM. BATHWICLWORKSPACEDWKITCHEN12'-10" X 9'-0"BALCONY8'-0" X 7'-8"UNIT B42 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,261 SQ. FT.WORKSPACEKQBATH 2LWORKSPACE36"x60" 36"x60" FURNITUREFURNITUREFURNITURE BUILT-INISLANDB3.0UNIT PLANS - WRAPS 3/16"=1'-0"4' 8' 16'0 2'1'4-STORY WRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-07-22JOB NO.: 19-043L7OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-07-22JOB NO.: 19-043L8OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES
Page 1 of 6
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA
Master Plan
04/27/2022
Exhibit G
Page 2 of 6
SITE PLAN
N
Page 3 of 6
DETAILED SITE PLAN
N
Page 4 of 6
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN
Land Use Mix
N
Page 5 of 6
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN
N
Page 6 of 6
SUMMARY TABLES
SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
(Master Plan)
Density 36 DU/AC
Front Setback - Foothill Boulevard Public ROW 0’ to 23’
Front Setback – Milliken Avenue Public ROW 12’ to 20’
Front Setback – Church Street Public ROW 15’ to 23’
Front Setback – Elm Avenue Public ROW 10’ to 15’
Front Setback - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’
Interior Setback – West property line facing adjacent shopping center 124’
Interior Setback - South property line facing adjacent shopping center 56’
Distance Between Buildings Per Building
Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter
17.64
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of
sidewalk.
PARKING
Number of
Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit (studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 152
Multi-family unit (One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit (Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34
Commercial (Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
LAND USE MIX / UNIT BREAKDOWN
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
Studio 84 33 117
1 Bedroom 153 194 347
2 Bedroom 86 121 207
TOTAL 323 348 671
Commercial
Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
I' I
Exhibit H
LEGEND
-�'HN,TO l(H,t,)((il,Vf!'ltAe,!C)#l6')
--rH10il!T06'MlDl!�T
Ill IUHt 6' TO IO' 1-1101! �T
-·-1-"WDl!'�T
•••••••• OTl-l8t �!IIUTY •l'ITl-1&
-""f&:l<.e,./\TI-1 '---------==
FOOTHILL BLVO,
-------------=--=--=--=-=--=------
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA N/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD, & MILLIKEN AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786 (909) 985-0971
;,---·
\
\
,\ \ I
FOO THILL
♦
' I ' I ' � <;:: I" ' "' I"'
,. I"'
'I
BLVO.
NORTH -• ., "' ,,.
WALKWAY CIRCULATION EXHIBIT
DATE: 01�7�22
JOB NO.: 19-0--43
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
144 NORTH ORANGE ST.. ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
,,
L2 AO
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 29, 2022
To: Brian Jacobson, Lewis Management Corp
From: Spencer Reed, PE and Jason Pack, PE
Subject: Harvest at Terra Vista Parking Management Plan
OC22-0877
This memorandum presents the parking management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista (Project)
development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. This parking management plan was
prepared based the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.070.
Project Description
The Project is bounded by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard
to the south, and Church Street to the north. The southwest corner of this block contains existing
retail uses, including a fast-food restaurant, which are not part of the Project, but will be utilized to
meet the commercial parking requirements.
The Project comprises of the following land uses:
323 three-story walk-up dwelling units
348 wrap product dwelling units
20,841 sq. ft. of commercial space
o 8,590 sq. ft. of retail space
o 12,251 sq. ft. of restaurant space
The Project proposes to provide 1,310 residential parking spaces. The residential parking includes
spaces for residents and guests with the use of angled and perpendicular parking on internal drive
aisles, parking in private garages, and driveway spaces behind some of the garages. The Project
Exhibit J
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 2 of 9
provides the required number of residential parking spaces per the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Section 17.64.050.
The Project proposes to provide 85 commercial parking spaces in the lower level of the wrap
residential parking structure and 35 parking spaces in the surface lot adjacent to the wrap building,
with the remaining requirement of 37 spaces to be fulfilled by sharing surface parking with the
existing commercial development. The Project also proposes to implement a parking management
plan. Table 1 summarizes the proposed commercial parking supply for the Project.
The existing Terra Vista Commons commercial development, which is directly adjacent to the
Project site, consists of the following uses:
7,100 sq. ft. of retail space
2,790 sq. ft. of restaurant space
3,500 sq. ft. of fast-food space
It should be noted that all parcels of the existing commercial development have one owner. That
owner also owns the multi-tenant commercial building. The fast food restaurant has a separate
owner and a ground lease from the owner of the commercial center. The existing surface parking
lot operates as one large shared parking pool, the existing uses and the total parking supply are
considered as one development for the purposes of this analysis. However, it should be noted that
our observations indicate that the bulk of the non-utilized parking on the site consists of the exiting
spaces between the McDonalds’s building and the AT&T store, north of those buildings. The
existing surface parking lot contains 160 parking spaces.
Since the commercial use of the Project will have designated parking, and will be parked separately
from the residential uses, the remainder of this memorandum addresses the proposed shared
parking between the existing and proposed retail on the site.
Parking Required Per City Code
Table 2 summarizes parking requirements of the commercial portion of the Project and the existing
commercial development per the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050. As shown
in the table, a total of 157 parking spaces are expected to be required for the proposed Project’s
commercial use per the City’s municipal code. Additionally, a total of 91 parking spaces are required
of the existing commercial development.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 3 of 9
Project Shared Parking Analysis
A shared parking analysis was conducted using methodologies and assumptions provided in Shared
Parking, 3rd Edition (Urban Land Institute [ULI], 2020). The ULI sponsored a national study that
established a basic methodology for analyzing parking demand in mixed-use developments and
developed averages for parking rates by land use. The analysis presented in this memorandum
utilizes the data from the Shared Parking, 3rd Edition report.
The shared parking methodology establishes the base parking rate, parking demand reductions,
and hourly/monthly demand patterns for each land use. The overall parking demand is calculated
by considering the parking demand patterns and parking demand reductions (potential for non-
auto modes and internal capture) for each component of the project being analyzed. Information
regarding the parking rates, parking demand reductions, and parking demand patterns for the
Project and the existing commercial development is provided below.
Parking Rates
The shared parking analysis for the Project’s commercial use utilized the City of Rancho Cucamonga
parking requirements that were adjusted to match the proportions base parking rates for customers
and employees as determined by ULI. Table 3 identifies the parking allocation of customers and
employees and demonstrates that the parking requirement for the commercial portion of the
Project meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking requirement of 157 parking spaces. Table 3
also identities the parking rates developed for the existing commercial development which reflects
the 91 parking space requirement.
Separate rates were used for weekday and weekend and for customers and employees. The derived
rates use the daily/hourly/seasonal patterns for calculating the parking demand based on the
unique travel characteristics of the project being analyzed. Adjustments were made for two travel
factors to match the ULI shared parking methodology: the potential for non-auto modes and the
estimated non-captive (otherwise known as internal capture) of parking between the land uses in
the area (e.g. people from the on-site residential uses accessing the retail).
Parking Demand Reductions
The shared parking analysis allows for adjustment in the base parking rate due to factors such as
mode split/walk-in and non-captive ratio. These factors are based on the mix of uses in the project,
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 4 of 9
size of the uses, and location of the project. Additional information regarding these factors is
provided below.
Mode Adjustment – One factor that affects the overall parking demand at a particular
development is the number of visitors and employees that arrive by automobile. The
alternatives considered in the analysis account for the effects of pedestrian, bicycle, drop-
off, and transit access to the site.
Noncaptive Ratio – Also known as trip internalization. Based on data from empirical studies
through sources such as ULI, it is known that a certain percentage of trips in mixed-use
developments (depending on the mix of land uses in the project) are trips moving between
the land uses on-site, i.e., they were internally captured on the site. Adjustments were made
to the analysis to account for trip internalization.
Table 4 documents the adjustment percentages applied to customers and employees to each of
the land uses for different periods of the day. Although Foothill Boulevard provides frequent transit
opportunities to access the commercial development and increased residential development along
the corridor will allow for additional pedestrian/bicycle activity to the site, we assumed no mode
split adjustment to reflect a conservative condition of all customers and employees driving to the
site. The non-captive ratio was applied based on the mix and size of the uses in the Project and
existing commercial development. These ratios were based on standards provided in Shared
Parking, 3rd Edition. It is assumed that some patrons will only park a vehicle once but visit multiple
components of the Project and existing commercial development.
Parking Demand Patterns
The shared parking analysis uses monthly adjustment factors and time-of-day adjustment factors
to account for the variation in parking demand for different land uses. Based on the anticipated
land uses and parking demand reductions applied, monthly adjustment factors are applied based
on the month that will result in the greatest parking demand (peak month). The time-of-day factors
are applied to the peak month demand to determine the estimated parking demand throughout
the day. Table 5 documents the weekday peak month adjustment and time-of-day adjustment for
customers and employees. Table 6 documents the weekend peak month adjustment and time-of-
day adjustment for customers and employees.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 5 of 9
Shared Parking Demand
Table 7 summarizes the shared parking analysis of the existing commercial development using the
methodology and assumptions described above. As shown in the table, an estimated peak parking
demand of 89 spaces (74 for customers and 15 for employees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00
PM in December. With inclusion of the Project an estimated peak parking demand of 240 spaces
(203 for customers and 37 for employees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00 PM in December as
documented in Table 8.
Table 9 and Table 10 present the estimated total parking demand distribution by each land use
category for weekday and weekend day, respectively. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show weekday and
weekend shared parking demand estimates for each month of the year. Demand for the month of
December is divided into “December” and “Late December”.
Existing Parking Demand
A parking survey of the existing commercial development was conducted during the evening of
March 10, 2022. Peak parking demand was found to be approximately 27 vehicles at 6:00 PM.
According to the shared parking analysis conducted for the existing commercial development, a
parking demand of 69 vehicles would be expected at 6:00 PM in March. The existing site parking
observations indicate half of the demand compared to what was estimated using the shared parking
methodology that was adjusted to reflect City parking code requirements. Therefore, it can be
assumed that the actual peak parking demand at 12:00 PM as determined in Table 7 could be lower
than the 88 spaces identified and provides a conservative assessment.
Parking Supply and Demand Conclusions
The shared parking analysis of the existing commercial development and the commercial portion
of the Project, utilizing City parking requirements, ULI parking demand reductions, and time-based
demand patterns resulted in a weekday parking space demand of 235 spaces and a weekend
parking space demand of 240 spaces. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.050, the Project would require 248 parking spaces (91 for the existing commercial
development and 157 for the Project). While the Project will provide less spaces than required per
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (120 proposed compared to 157 required), the site
commercial parking supply of 280 spaces (160 existing and 120 proposed) and use of shared
parking will satisfy the estimated parking demand.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 6 of 9
Although the shared parking assessment within the commercial portion of the Project indicates that
there will be sufficient parking provided, there is the potential for parking from the residential to
“spill out” into the commercial parking if parking for the entire site is not properly managed. As
such, we have provided the following parking management recommendations in the following
section that should be considered.
Parking Management Recommendations
The following recommendations are aimed to provide an organized and systematic parking
management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista while mitigating parking congestion in the site’s
surrounding neighborhoods. These recommendations should be continually reviewed/updated as
needed to maximize the efficiency of the parking facilities if necessary.
Commercial Parking Recommendations
Commercial Parking Locations
All commercial parking will be required to park on-site in designated spots identified for
commercial parking. These non-reserved parking spaces will be utilized on a first come first serve
basis. Commercial users are not allowed to park in residential or guest parking spaces and shall not
park in nearby neighborhoods. Even if residential and guest parking spaces are unassigned,
commercial users are neither allowed to utilize the unassigned resident parking spaces nor will have
access to any gated resident parking area.
Static Signage
Static signage should be installed within the Project site to guide vehicles to the associated parking
facilities. Signage should also be installed within the parking facilities identifying specific parking
spaces or identifying the facility as commercial parking for the Project or provides time restrictions
that prevents over-night parking within the commercial parking area. The installation of static
signage can inform visitors of their parking options and direct them to locations them may not
associate with the commercial component of the Project.
Assigning Parking Locations
Assigning parking locations to commercial employees could reduce demand on desired parking
spaces. Employees could be assigned to harder to find or further away commercial parking spaces
to free up closer parking spaces for guests. Additionally, assigned employee spaces could be
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 7 of 9
strategically located closest to the residential uses to better management potential parking spill
over from the residential uses on the site.
Accommodating Transportation Network Companies
Providing dedicated pick-up and drop-off locations to Transportation Network Companies (TNC’s)
such as Uber and Lyft could reduce the parking demand. While the parking demand calculations
do not consider parking demand reductions due to alternative modes of transportation,
encouragement of TNCs through dedicated pick-up and drop-off locations could result in
customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Promoting Other Modes of Transportation
Encouraging the use of other modes of transportation such as transit, bicycles, and walking could
reduce parking demand. While the parking demand calculations do not consider parking demand
reductions due to alternative modes of transportation, encouragement of these types of
transportation options through improving transit stops, bicycle parking, or sidewalk improvements
could result in customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Residential Parking Recommendations
Resident Parking Location
All residents and their guests will be required to park on site in designated residential parking
spaces. Only residents and their guests with be granted access to the residential parking areas.
Guest Parking Location
Guest parking will be available on a first-come, first-served basis within the residential community.
With appropriate registration, guests will be allowed to park in any unmarked, unassigned
residential parking space. Guests are not allowed to park in commercial parking spaces and shall
not park in nearby neighborhoods.
Register Vehicles with Management
All resident vehicles will be required to be registered with building management as part of their
lease agreement. Only those registered vehicles will be allowed to park within the community.
Management staff will monitor the amount of resident parking spaces that are available. Units will
not be leased to tenants if a potential tenant has more vehicles than spaces allotted for their unit.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 8 of 9
Assigned Vehicle Parking
All resident vehicles will be assigned a specific parking spot that is numbered and reserved for the
specific vehicles use only. Parking spaces are assigned to one (1) specific resident vehicle only and
are not able to be shared with other resident or guest vehicles. If a tenant’s vehicle information
should change, it is the responsibility of the tenant to notify management in accordance with the
lease agreement.
Security / Monitoring
Management staff and security personnel will be on-site daily from 8am-2:30am to monitor and
enforce compliance with the requirements of the Parking Management Plan and the requirements
set for in the tenants’ lease agreements. Cameras will be also be utilized to monitor the parking
areas. Any violation of the parking requirements set forth in the tenants’ lease agreements will be
subject to towing, revoked parking privileges, and/or eviction.
Management staff will employ parking enforcement software to enforce parking rules.
Management staff will also review potential parking spill-over into adjacent areas through review
of security footage and/or site observations.
Maximum Number of Vehicles & Monitoring
A maximum total number of vehicles will be allowed per apartment, with the below requirements:
Maximum of 1 parking space for a studio or 1-bedroom apartment
Maximum of 2 parking spaces for a 2-bedroom apartment
The number of remaining parking spaces available at the property will be monitored during lease
up and stabilization. If there are not a sufficient number of available spaces for a potential resident’s
vehicles, a lease will not be executed for that prospective tenant.
Additional Parking Language
The parking rules will include the below requirements:
All resident vehicles must be registered with management
No unregistered vehicles shall be parked on site
Open parking shall be on a first-come, first-serve basis
Residents with an assigned parking space shall only park in that space, and shall not share
the parking space with any other vehicle
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 9 of 9
Resident guests shall park on site, on a first come first serve basis in the open spaces
Residents and guests may have their vehicle towed at their own expense if they do not
have the appropriate parking permit displayed
Residents may be non-renewed if parking rules and regulations are repeatedly violated.
If a resident’s vehicle information changes, it is his/her responsibility to notify management
in writing in accordance with the lease agreement. Failure to do so could result in the
vehicle being towed at the owner’s expense.
TABLE 1
PARKING SUPPLY FOR
HAVEST AT TERRA VISTA COMMERICAL USES
Location Supply
Parking Structure Lower Level 85 spaces
Surface Parking 35 spaces
Shared Surface Parking 37 spaces
Total 157 spaces
TABLE 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING RATES
FOR PROJECT AND EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Parking Rate [a]
Use
Number of
Spaces Per Unit Total Size Unit
Parking Spaces
Required Per Code
Project
Retail [b]4 1,000 sqft 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Existing Commercial Development
Retail [b]4 1,000 sqft 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
Notes
a: Source - Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.60.050
c: Identified as restaurants and lounges in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
b: As retail space is less than 25,000 sf, the space has been identified as offices, financial institutions, retail stores in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code
TABLE 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING RATES FOR PROJECT
WITH URBAN LAND INSTITUTE CUSTOMER AND EMPLOYEE RATIOS
Use Customers Employee Total Size Unit
Parking Spaces
Required Per Code
Project Weekday Ratios
Retail 3.22 0.78 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant 8.76 1.24 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Project Weekend Ratios
Retail 3.20 0.80 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant 8.77 1.23 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Existing Commercial Development Weekday Ratios
Retail 3.22 0.78 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant 8.76 1.24 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant 8.61 1.39 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
Existing Commercial Development Weekend Ratios
Retail 3.20 0.80 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant 8.77 1.23 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant 8.64 1.36 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
TABLE 4
SHARED PARKING MODEL REDUCTION ASSUMPTIONS
Mode Adjustment Noncaptive Ratio
Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend
Use ULI Land Use
Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening
Retail Shopping Center
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%3% 5% 3%5%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
Restaurant Family Restaurant
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%18% 19% 19%18%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
TABLE 5SHARED PARKING MODEL MONTH AND WEEKDAY TIME OF DAY DEMAND ASSUMPTIONSPeak MonthTime-of-Day FactorsUse ULI Land UseDecember 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMRetail Shopping Center- Customer100% 1% 5% 15% 30% 55% 75% 90% 100% 100% 95% 80% 85% 90% 90% 85% 50% 30% 10% 0%- Employee100% 10% 15% 25% 45% 75% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 60% 40% 20% 0%Restaurant Family Restaurant- Customer100% 25% 50% 60% 75% 85% 90% 100% 90% 50% 45% 45% 75% 80% 80% 80% 60% 55% 50% 25%- Employee100% 50% 75% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 95% 95% 95% 95% 80% 65% 65% 35%Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant- Customer96% 5% 10% 20% 30% 55% 85% 100% 100% 90% 60% 55% 60% 85% 80% 50% 30% 20% 10% 5%- Employee100% 20% 20% 30% 40% 75% 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 60% 70% 90% 90% 60% 40% 30% 20% 20%
TABLE 6SHARED PARKING MODEL MONTH AND WEEKEND TIME OF DAY DEMAND ASSUMPTIONSPeak MonthTime-of-Day FactorsUse ULI Land UseDecember 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMRetail Shopping Center- Customer100% 1% 5% 10% 35% 60% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 80% 65% 60% 55% 50% 35% 15% 1%- Employee100% 10% 15% 40% 75% 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 85% 80% 75% 65% 45% 15% 0%Restaurant Family Restaurant- Customer100% 10% 25% 45% 70% 90% 90% 100% 85% 65% 40% 45% 60% 70% 70% 65% 30% 25% 15% 10%- Employee100% 50% 75% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 95% 95% 95% 95% 80% 65% 65% 35%Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant- Customer96% 5% 10% 20% 30% 55% 85% 100% 100% 90% 60% 55% 60% 85% 80% 50% 30% 20% 10% 5%- Employee100% 15% 20% 30% 40% 75% 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 60% 70% 90% 90% 60% 40% 30% 20% 20%
TABLE 7SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY - EXISTING COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENTULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK MONTH: DECEMBER -- PEAK PERIOD: 12 PM, WEEKENDQuantityUnit1 PM December 12 PM DecemberRetail (<400 ksf)7,100 sf GLA 3.22 100% 99% 3.20 ksf GLA 3.20 100% 99% 3.18 ksf GLA 100% 100%21100% 100%23Employee0.78 100% 100% 0.78 0.80 100% 100% 0.80 100% 100%6100% 100%6Family Restaurant2,790 sf GLA 8.76 100% 98% 8.58 ksf GLA 8.77 100% 98% 8.63 ksf GLA 90% 100%25100% 100%25Employee1.24 100% 100% 1.24 1.23 100% 100% 1.23 100% 100%4100% 100%4Fast Food Restaurant3,500 sf GLA 8.61 100% 91% 7.84 ksf GLA 8.64 100% 91% 7.87 ksf GLA 100% 96%26100% 96%26Employee1.39 100% 100% 1.39 1.36 100% 100% 1.36 100% 100%5100% 100%571 74151586898% 6%Shared Parking ReductionCustomer CustomerEmployee EmployeeRetailFood and BeverageTotal TotalProject RatioUnit For RatioPeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandPeak Hr AdjNon-Captive RatioProject RatioUnit For RatioBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioLand UseProject DataWeekday Weekend Weekday WeekendBase RatioDriving AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking Demand
TABLE 8SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY - PROJECT AND EXISTING COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENTULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK MONTH: DECEMBER -- PEAK PERIOD: 12 PM, WEEKENDQuantityUnit1 PM December 12 PM DecemberRetail (<400 ksf)15,690sf GLA 3.22 100% 98% 3.17 ksf GLA 3.20 100% 98% 3.14 ksf GLA 90% 100%45100% 100%50Employee0.78 100% 100% 0.78 0.80 100% 100% 0.80 100% 100%13100% 100%13Family Restaurant15,041 sf GLA 8.76 100% 99% 8.71 ksf GLA 8.77 100% 100% 8.73 ksf GLA 100% 100%131100% 100%131Employee1.24 100% 100% 1.24 1.23 100% 100% 1.23 100% 100%19100% 100%19Fast Food Restaurant3,500 sf GLA 8.61 100% 78% 6.73 ksf GLA 8.64 100% 79% 6.80 ksf GLA 100% 96%21100% 96%21Employee1.39 100% 100% 1.39 1.36 100% 100% 1.36 100% 100%5100% 100%5198 20337372352407% 5%Total TotalShared Parking ReductionCustomer CustomerEmployee EmployeeRetailFood and BeveragePeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandPeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandUnit For RatioBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioProject RatioUnit For RatioLand UseProject DataWeekday Weekend Weekday WeekendBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioProject Ratio
Total Development (Sqft or Rooms) Land-Use6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Hour Parking Demand15,690 Retail2 4 11 21 37 50 58 63 63 61 53 55 58 58 54 33 20 8 0 5813,791 Restaurant42 80 96 116 131 137 150 137 85 73 73 117 123 123 123 94 85 78 40 1384,750 Fast Food23681523262624161516222113863238Total 44 82 107 139 179 209 234 227 175 152 142 186 204 203 187 132 106 84 39TABLE 9ULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK PARKING DEMAND DISTRIBUTION (WEEKDAY)448210713917920923422717515214218620420318713210684390501001502002506 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Parking Demand Distribution ‐WeekdayRetailRestaurantFast FoodTotalRetail, 58Restaurant, 138Fast Food, 38Peak Hour Parking Demand ‐Weekday
Total Development (Sqft or Rooms) Land-Use6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Hour Parking Demand15,690 Retail2 4 10 27 41 55 63 63 63 63 58 52 43 40 37 33 23 9 0 6313,791 Restaurant23 47 76 109 137 137 150 131 104 67 73 97 110 110 104 55 45 32 20 1374,750 Fast Food23681523262624161517232214963239Total 26 52 87 139 189 214 239 221 193 148 147 164 178 173 151 95 73 43 21TABLE 10ULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK PARKING DEMAND DISTRIBUTION (WEEKEND)265287139189214239221193148147164178173151957343210501001502002506 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Parking Demand Distribution ‐WeekendRetailRestaurantFast FoodTotalRetail, 63Restaurant, 137Fast Food, 39Peak Hour Parking Demand ‐Weekend
197197219212222216217219204212211235220050100150200250January February March April May June July August September October November December LateDecemberPeak Parking DemandWeekday Parking DemandFigure 1
195195218210220215216217202210209240216050100150200250January February March April May June July August September October November December LateDecemberPeak Parking DemandWeekend Parking DemandFigure 2
CHURCH
STREETFOOTHILL BOULEVARDELM STREET
MILLIKENAVENUE24'26'26'26'26'26'26'26'33'26'24'26'26'
24'26'26'26'26'26'26'44'44'67'
65'26'26'24'26'24'26'26'24'26'
26'
118'R=185' L=36'N0°08'55"W 252'N89°51'05"E 250'R=2934'L=176'N0°14'48"W
97'13 '6=2R=24' L=36'214'N89°51'05"E 126'N89°51'05"E55'N0°08'55"W 247'
=2 29R3L=14'N58°48'01"W26'R=3050'R'R=2938'L=39'N04°57'42"E4'=R196L=218'R=1044' L=34'N0°08'55"W 279'N05°43'09"E5'R=24' L=38'R=2936' L=21'N5°33'50"W 196'=0'L='N77°43'56"E4''4R=1516'L=159'R=192' L=37'R = 2931'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAS STATION(N.A.P.)LOT 4P.M. 15424(N.A.P.)PARCEL 3LOT 3LOT 2N89°51'05"E26'L=57'R=161'L=30'R=85'N89°51'05"E71'N01°41'24"E N00°08'55"W 32'N41°00'06"E N11°56'39"W 6'N78°03'21"E880'L=41'N83°58'58"W 136'L N85°35'40"E 5'84LOT 1N89°51'05"E 145'N89°51'05"E32'L=52'R=214'L=73'R=143'N89°09'59"E32'N87°15'01"E50'N89°01'22"E91'L=3'R=50'N0°00'15"E 211'R=20' L=11'R=47' L=61'N08°56'36"W 137'N78°03'21"E1052'N00°25'08"W17'L=30'L=156'526'526'INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)60'N12°33'31"W29.80'EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST.
R
.O
.W
.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.PROPERTY L
INEPROPERTY L
INE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINELINEPROPERTY(5.69 AC)R=2938'(1.71 AC)(1.69 AC)(9.47 AC)50'94'60'127'
116'50'94'79'69'148'66'126'64'66'130'44'50'94'44'44'88'PROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.WATER PROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.
STORM
DRA
IN
PROP.
STORM
DRA
IN PROP.
STORM
DRA
INPROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.SEWER
DCULTIMATE R.O.W
.ADDITIONAL5'DEDICATIONULTIMATE R.O.W
.L=39'ULTIMATE R.O.W.(0.10 AC)EXIST. R.O.W.
ADD'LDEDIC.
VARIES
5'49'93'26'24'26'26'CL60'60'
120'
70'60'
130'
147.5'
125'
60'65'
22.5'
60'
142.5'DEDICAT
IONADDIT
IONALBVACATIONEXIST. R / W(0.10 AC)DEDICAT
IONADDIT
IONALB49'(0.01 AC)ESEE DETAIL"A" ABOVE50'66'
26.5'
117'
50'
67'VARIES139'70'69'(0.32 AC)DEDICATIONADDITIONALB(0.01 AC)EEXIST. R.O.W. 6'5'1'R=3050'L=218'R=3049'L=217'N78°03'21"EN11°56'39"WN78°03'21"EULTIMATE
R
/
WEXIST. R / W VACATION32'N41°00'06"E 33'N41°00'06"E
AO ARCHITECTS144 NORTH ORANGE ST.ORANGE, CA 92866CONTACT:(714) 639-9860Email: @aoarchitects.comARCHITECTIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJANUARY, 202218.99 AC. GROSS TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20120BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1, 2, 4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP No. 15424, AS PER PLATRECORDED IN BOOK 191, PAGES 46 THROUGH 48 AND OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO.15455, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 191, PAGES 33 THROUGH 35, BOTH OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.18.56 AC. NETAPN: 1077-422-51,52,54,55 AND 1090-121-28(198 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)1. PRESENT ZONING: PC-TV2. LAND USE PROPOSED - MIXED USE3. THIS SITE CONTAINS 18.99 GROSS ACRES.4. THIS SITE CONTAINS 18.62 NET ACRES.5. THIS SITE CONSISTS OF (3) NUMBERED LOTS6. THIS SITE CONTAINS 2 LETTERED LOTS7. CONTOURS FROM MADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.DATED: 03/27/20208. SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT.9. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA TBD ACRES.10. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA TBD ACRES.NTSVICINITY MAPMILLIKEN CHURCHMAYTEN PROJECT LOCATIONELM FOOTHILLSTREETAVENUE
AVENUEEUCALYPTUSSTREET
AVENUEBOULEVARDSPRUCE
AVENUE
VERIZON1400 E. PHILLIPS BLVD.POMONA, CA 91766ATTN: JERRY PAUBELPHONE: (909) 469-6354SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.13525 12th STREETCHINO, CA 91719PHONE: (909) 613-1531UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 811SET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURBSTAMPED "CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA BM 10054 1987" AT N/ECOR. OF BASELINE ROAD & MILLIKENAVE., AT WEST END OF CATCH BASIN.NO. 10054ELEV.=1328.075UTILITY COMPANIESCUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT10440 ASHFORD STREET P.O. BOX 638RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729PHONE: (909) 987-2591SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY7951 REDWOOD AVENUEFONTANA, CA. 92336PHONE: (909) 820-5598 UNDERGROUNDPHONE: (909) 875-5100 TRANSMISSIONSPHONE: (213) 637-1233 PIPELINESPHONE: (909) 357-6233 DISTRIBUTIONCONTACT: ISAAC DOMINGUEZPHONE (909) 930-8576 EMAIL:isaac.dominguez@sce.comCIVIL ENGINEEROWNER/DEVELOPERMADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730CONTACT: MARK BERTONE(909) 481-6322 ext. 120Email: mbertone@madoleinc.comWDC COMMONS, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVEUPLAND, CA. 91786CONTACT: BRIAN JACOBSON(909)579-1214 OFFICEEmail: Brian.Jacobson@lewismc.comSITESCAPES, INC.3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVECOSTA MESA, CA. 92626CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS(949) 644-9370Email: rpolhamus@sitescapes.netLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEMADOLE&ASSOCIATES, INC.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAHARVEST AT TERRA VISTADATE: JANUARY 10, 2022JOB NO. 126-2647TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM-1HALF MEDIAN ---------------- 6'#1 EASTBOUND LANE ------ 11'#2 EASTBOUND LANE ------ 11'BUFFER ------------------------- 3'RAISED CYCLE TRACK ---- 7'URBAN SIDEWALK --------- 11'TOTAL LANE WIDTH -------- 49'CHURCH STREET 49' R / W DIMENSION STRING:DETAIL "A"SCALE: 1" = 20'4 NUMBERED LOTSJ:\126-2647\tentative\TTM01.dwg, 1/10/2022 3:20:20 PM, gbarronExhibit K
Design Review Committee Meeting
Rains Conference Room
AGENDA
March 15, 2022
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee was held on March 15, 2022. The meeting was called to
order by Mike Smith, Staff Coordinator, at 7:00 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Diane Williams, Tony Morales
Staff Present: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
B.Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and, after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 15, 2022.
Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented.
D.Project Review Items
D1. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master Plan and
construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of
commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55,
-98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074).
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote
Staff made a presentation to the Design Review Committee, followed by a brief presentation by the applicant
highlighting project amenities and operations. Both Design Review Committee members were very pleased
with the project design, the number of amenities, provided, and the project layout.
Committee Member Morales asked about the visibility of the parking structure over the residential wrap
building, and if this is a concern for staff. Staff noted that the parking structure protruding beyond the roofline
of the residential “wrap” portion of the building is a known issue. Staff requested that the applicant provide a
3D view depicting the parking structure. Based on these renderings, the parking structure visibility will be
very minimal. Staff noted that light standards will not be installed on the top level of the parking structure in
order to reduce its visibility. Additionally, a Condition of Approval will be added to screen a portion of the
Exhibit L
Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes – March 15, 2022
Page 2 of 2
Draft
parking structure in the event that the Planning Director determines that screening is required while the wrap
building is under construction.
Both Committee members remarked that the proposed project architecture is refreshing and unique for this
area. They both liked that the project was broken down into smaller blocks for easy pedestrian access, and
the fact that the project is publicly accessible. The Design Review Committee moved to recommend that
project as proposed to the full Planning Commission for consideration.
E. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill
Executive Assistant, Planning Department
Approved:
Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/py8i3sb3fkd1uty/AABXm-kCUfZV-
FIJGAW8xk27a/WDCC%20Milliken%20West%20Residential%20LLC%20-
%20Section%2015183%20Compliance%20Memo?dl=0&subfolder_nav_tracking=1
Exhibit M
RESOLUTION NO. 22-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 20120, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT SITE OF
APPROXIMATELY 17.2 ACRES INTO 4 NUMBERED LOTS FOR
CONDOMINIMUM WITHIN THE MIXED-USE URBAN CORRIDOR (MU-UCR)
DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, AND
-39.
A.Recitals.
1.WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC. filed an application for the issuance of
Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 27th day of April 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 27, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to applies to a vacant site located at the northwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; and
b. The project site has an area of approximately 17.2 acres. The project site covers
approximately three-fourths of the city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue
to the east, Church Street to the north, and Foothill Boulevard to the south; and
c.The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations
for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted) are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR)
District
Exhibit N
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-12
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20120 (SUBTT00024) – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 2
d. The proposal is to subdivide a site of approximately 17-2 acres into 4 numbered
lots for condominium purposes, in relation to the construction of a mixed-use development
comprising of 671 apartment units and 20,841 square feet of commercial space; and
e. The project site will have four points of vehicular access from driveways coming
from Church Street, Milliken Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and Elm Avenue. The Engineering
Department has included conditions that require the construction of right-of way improvements;
and
f. This application is in conjunction with Design Review 2021-00120 to construct a
mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartment units and 20,841 square feet of commercial
space and Master Plan DRC2022-00074 to establish a Master Plan on the project site; and
g. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on March 15, 2022.
The committee was very supportive of the project architecture, layout, and amenities. The
committee voted to move the project forward as presented to the Design Review Committee to
the full Planning Commission for consideration; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The design and layout of the subject Tentative Tract Map will be consistent with
the General Plan and the Development Code. The project site is being subdivided to facilitate the
development of a mixed-use project which will be consistent with the Mixed-Use zoning of the
project site; and
b. The site is physically suitable for the subdivision which will create four (4)
numbered lots for condominium purposes; and
c. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. A CEQA Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning that
demonstrates that the subject project is fully consistent with the site’s General Plan land use
North Multifamily
Residential
Suburban
Neighborhood
Moderate
Medium High (MH) Residential 1
South
Shopping Center
(north and south
of Foothill)
City Corridor High
Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC)1
north of Foothill and Industrial Park (IP)
south of Foothill
East Hospital/
Partially Vacant City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office
(MHO)1
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-12
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20120 (SUBTT00024) – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 3
designation of “City Corridor – High”, consistent with all applicable General Plan policies, and is
within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s General Plan update on December 15,
2021.
d. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The
tentative map is proposed in conjunction with a mixed-use development comprising of 671
apartment units and 20,841 square feet of commercial space. A CEQA Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning that
demonstrates that the subject project is fully consistent with the site’s General Plan land use
designation of “City Corridor – High”, consistent with all applicable General Plan policies, and is
within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s General Plan update on December 15,
2021.
e. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision. Access to the property will be from existing public streets surrounding the project site
and access to the individual future development will be from private streets to be constructed on
the subject property.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based
upon the findings as follows:
a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s
General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.
2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for
“City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging
from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a
Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large
project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy
alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address
project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not
peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR,
or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or
standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that
impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High”
land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family
residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and
would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR is required for the proposed project. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental
review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was
prepared by T & B Planning. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is
within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-12
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20120 (SUBTT00024) – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 4
will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe
effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not
required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in
the attached Conditions of Approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP
I, Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP, of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2022, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO. 22-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2021-00120, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING OF 671 APARTMENTS AND 20,841
SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITHIN THE MIXED-USE
URBAN CORRIDOR (MU-UCR) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs:
1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39.
A.Recitals.
1.WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Design
Review DRC2021-00120, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 27th day of April 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
A.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 27, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a vacant site located at the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; and
b.The project site has an area of approximately 17.2 acres. The project site covers
approximately three-fourths of the city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue
to the east, Church Street to the north, and Foothill Boulevard to the south; and
c.The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for
the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted site) are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR)
District
North Multifamily
Residential
Suburban
Neighborhood Medium High (MH) Residential 1
Exhibit O
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-11
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2021-00120 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 2
d. The proposed project consists of the construction a mixed-use development
comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space; and
e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024)
to subdivide the property into 4 numbered lots for condominium purposes and Master Plan
DRC2022-00074 to establish a Master Plan on the project site; and
f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on March 15, 2022.
The committee was very supportive of the project architecture, layout, and amenities. The
committee voted to move the project forward as presented to the Design Review Committee to
the full Planning Commission for consideration; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan
Designation for the project site is City Corridor High, which envisions high development intensities
along Foothill Boulevard, particularly adjacent to city centers. The project proposes a total of 671
apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space with a density of 36 dwelling units per
acre, which is consistent with the General Plan’s vision; and
b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development
Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the
Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, which is an area for a mix of residential and
nonresidential uses of medium to high intensity, and where a vibrant pedestrian environment and
transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods are achieved. The project provides for a proper
mix of residential and commercial uses, concentrating pedestrian activity and intensity along
Foothill Boulevard while transitioning building scale appropriately to the surrounding area; and
c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code. As allowed in the Development Code, the project is being proposed in
conjunction with a Master Plan, which allows for a coordinated, comprehensive planning of a
subarea of the city, in order to develop an exceptional project design that cannot be built due to
constraints in existing development standards. The master plan will provide flexibility in two areas:
setbacks and minimum building height, that is primarily applicable to the walk-up residential units
Moderate
South
Shopping Center
(north and south
of Foothill)
City Corridor High
Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC)1
north of Foothill and Industrial Park (IP)
south of Foothill
East Hospital/
Partially Vacant City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office
(MHO)1
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-11
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2021-00120 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 3
along Church Street and a portion of Milliken Avenue. Aside from these minor deviations that the
master plan can accommodate, the project complies with the remaining applicable provisions of
the development code; and
d. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will
not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with
the General Plan’s vision for Foothill Boulevard and the expectations of the community.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based
upon the findings as follows:
a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s
General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.
2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for
“City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging
from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a
Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large
project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy
alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address
project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not
peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR,
or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or
standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that
impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High”
land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family
residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and
would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR is required for the proposed project. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental
review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was
prepared by T & B Planning. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is
within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project
will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe
effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not
required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in
the attached Conditions of Approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-11
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2021-00120 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP
I, Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP, of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2022, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO. 22-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
MASTER PLAN DRC2022-00074, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A MASTER
PLAN FOR A VACANT SITE OF APPROXIMATELY 17.2 ACRES LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APNS: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, AND -39.
A.Recitals.
1.WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Master
Plan DRC2022-00074, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Master Plan application request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 27th day of April 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 27, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a vacant site located at the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; and
b.The project site for the application has an area of approximately 17.2 acres. The
project site covers approximately three-fourths of the city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the
west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Church Street to the north, and Foothill Boulevard to the south;
and
c.The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for
the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted) are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR)
District
North Multifamily
Residential
Suburban
Neighborhood Medium High (MH) Residential 1
Exhibit P
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-10
MASTER PLAN DRC2022-00074 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 2
d. The proposal is to establish a Master Plan creating unique development
standards for the project site in order to enable a mixed-use development of 671 apartment units
and 20,841 square feet of commercial space; and
e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024)
to subdivide the property into 4 numbered lots for condominium purposes and Design Review
DRC2021-00120 to construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartment units and
20,841 square feet of commercial space; and
f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on March 15, 2022.
The committee was very supportive of the project architecture, layout, and amenities. The
committee voted to move the project forward as presented to the Design Review Committee to
the full Planning Commission for consideration; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed Master Plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives
of the General Plan. The site has a General Plan designation of City Corridor High, which
envisions high development intensities along Foothill Boulevard, particularly adjacent to city
centers. The proposed Master Plan enables the development of Design Review DRC2021-00120,
which is a mixed-use project comprising of 671 apartment units and 20,841 square feet of
commercial space. The design and layout of this development is consistent with the General Plan
goals, policies, and objectives for the project site. However, the development cannot be built
under the existing development standards due to unique project characteristics, which themselves
effectively implement the vision of the General Plan. The Master Plan application allows for the
flexibility to allow the development project as proposed beyond what would be allowed under the
conventional zoning district; and
b. The proposed Master plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in
Chapter 17.22.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The proposed Master Plan
application meets the purpose and intent of a Master Plan as discussed in the development code.
Furthermore, the Master plan document contains all required sections as outlined in Chapter
17.22.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
Moderate
South
Shopping Center
(north and south
of Foothill)
City Corridor High
Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC)1
north of Foothill and Industrial Park (IP)
south of Foothill
East Hospital/
Partially Vacant City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office
(MHO)1
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-10
MASTER PLAN DRC2022-00074 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 3
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based
upon the findings as follows:
a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s
General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.
2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for
“City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging
from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a
Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large
project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy
alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address
project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not
peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR,
or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or
standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that
impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High”
land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family
residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and
would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR is required for the proposed project. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental
review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was
prepared by T & B Planning. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is
within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project
will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe
effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not
required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Master Plan DRC2022-00074 as depicted on
Exhibit B, attached hereto.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-10
MASTER PLAN DRC2022-00074 – WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
April 27, 2022
Page 4
ATTEST:
Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP
I, Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP, of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2022, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
All off-site advertisement for the project is prohibited Citywide unless approval is granted by the
Planning Director.
1.
Occupancy for the walk-up product shall be limited to 65% (212 units) until a building permit is obtained
by the developer and construction has commenced on the wrap building. Subsequently, occupancy for
the walk-up product shall be limited to 80% (294 units) until at least 50% of the non-residential portion of
the wrap building has been built and tenanted. The developer shall provide the City with copies of
commercial leases to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Finally, no occupancy shall be
granted on any residential units on the wrap building until all non -residential spaces on the wrap building
has been built and tenanted. The developer shall provide the City with copies of commercial leases to
demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
2.
The project shall remain in compliance with the parking management plan at all times. In the event of any
observed parking violations to the parking management plan, the City reserves the right to require the
preparation of off-site, on-street parking restrictions such as, but not limited to, no parking signage,
time-limit parking signage, red curb, any necessary street repairs /improvements, or the establishment
of the parking district at the cost of the property owner/developer.
3.
Developer shall include photometric plans on the building plan check set, for Planning Department
review and approval. Please be aware that pedestrian level lighting along the project perimeter may be
required by the Planning Department during this time.
4.
The developer/contractor shall schedule a Planning Inspection when construction of the 4-story
residential wrap building reaches the roof sheathing stage to allow the Planning Department to verify
adequate screening of the parking structure has been achieved. The developer /contractor. shall also
conduct a height survey to verify the height of the parking structure and four -story wrap building is
consistent with the approved plans. As a result of the inspection and /or height survey, the Planning
Department may require additional screening and /or enhancements to minimize or reduce the visibility
of the parking structure from the public view, including, but not limited to structural additions, painting,
and/or installation of veneers along the edge of the parking structure, among others, in a manner that is
acceptable to the Planning Director or designee.
5.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the four -story wrap building, the developer shall provide
the Planning Department a recorded document that memorializes a shared parking agreement between
the project and the Terra Vista Commons shopping center located at the Northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Elm Avenue. The shared parking agreement shall specifically note the number of stalls
shared between the Terra Vista Commons shopping center and the project, per the project ’s parking
management plan, and the parking plan sheet included in the approved plans.
6.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections
shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent
nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included
in building plans.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and /or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
9.
Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident
manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free
Multi-Family Housing Program.
10.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such
action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. In the
event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The applicant shall
deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they
become due.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .
Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the
Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined
in 17.124.020.D.
If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building
permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.
If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an
application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to
the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate
the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.
If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be
subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the
proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
13.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
14.
For multi-family residential and non -residential development, property owners are responsible for the
continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the
public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in
healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any
damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of
damage.
15.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
16.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval
prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics
of the selected tree species.
17.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per
30 linear feet of building.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design
shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.
19.
Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient
landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
20.
All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.21.
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and
exits shall be striped per City standards.
22.
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any
signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate
application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs.
23.
Unless exempt, directory monument sign (s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town
homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter
17.74.040 B-4)
24.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
25.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
26.
The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for
Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public
notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
27.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations,
and the Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan.
28.
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
29.
For multiple-family development, provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California
Green Building Code.
30.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
31.
A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles,
free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ., shall be utilized and be compatible with the
architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
32.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
33.
For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development
Code.
34.
A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800 ) prior to the issuance of Building Permits .
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
35.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
36.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has
commenced, whichever comes first.
37.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
38.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The existing ramps located at the street intersections shall be evaluated for conformance to current
ADA regulations. If the ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible
for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance . Design shall be completed and
improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map
whichever occurs first . The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior
to occupancy.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
2.
(DIF Fees):
Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per
the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest
these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be
delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period.
*Note that fees are subject to change annually.
3.
RCMU Electric:
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider for all project
related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and
shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and RCMU
requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
underground electric system is located off of the NEC of Milliken Ave and Foothill Blvd of the proposed
development.
4.
RCMU Fiber:
Fiber Optics
- Place 1-4” conduit structure (Mainline) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) at 18” depth from
demarcation location in the public right of way or utility easement dedicated specifically to the Rancho
Fiber project. This conduit system will be required to follow the joint trench distribution system within the
project where the conduit bank can be installed alongside the Telco and CATV conduits at the proper
communication depth.
- Place 1-2” conduit structure (Service) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) directly from mainline
pullbox to an 8” round plastic “flower pot” type telecom access box flush mounted to finish grade to serve
as a drop access point to city network directly at each individual residence. This drop conduit shall be
dedicated for City fiber drop installation only.
- An Optical network demarcation enclosure /panel shall be mounted on the side of the home, garage or
utility closet for the placement of a Fiber Optic Network Interface Device. Place a #6 solid ground wire
placed from network demarcation enclosure to power ground. If no power ground exists a 5/8” x 8”
copper clad ground rod is to be installed for ground wire to be connected.
RCMU’s underground fiber optic system is located off of the NEC of Milliken Ave and Foothill Blvd of the
proposed development. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on
the Street Improvement and /or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services
Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval,
whichever comes first.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
(In-Lieu Fees for Required Ultimate Improvements):
An in-lieu fee as contribution, along the project frontage of Foothill Blvd, shall be required for ultimate
public improvements per General Plan that are not constructed at this time. The fee shall be the
construction cost of the ultimate improvement items that are not built and subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
6.
(Traffic Signal Modifications):
Traffic signal equipment shall be relocated in accordance to City and Caltrans standard plans and latest
ADA requirements. Location of proposed equipment shall be determined during the plan check
process. A traffic signal modification plan and signing and striping plan shall be submitted for review
and approval.
7.
(Proposed Interim Vs. Ultimate Improvements):
The developer shall provide a Site Plan showing the proposed interim public improvements and a Site
Plan showing the ultimate public improvements.
The developer shall also provide design plans for the constructions of the ultimate street improvements
along Foothill Blvd, from the centerline of Milliken Blvd to the centerline of Elm Avenue. All public
improvement plans shall be provided for review and approval to the Engineering Services Department
prior to building permitting or final map approval, whichever comes first.
8.
The project Final Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of
Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved prior to issuance of Building Permits.
9.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted
on the final map.
10.
Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.11.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedications, street designs, and roadway typologies shall be made per new General Plan as follows
and on the following perimeter streets.
Foothill Blvd as a Boulevard,
Milliken Ave as an Arterial Roadway,
Elm Ave as a Collector Street, and
Church Street as a Bicycle (Class IV) Corridor.
Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
87.5 total feet on Foothill Blvd,
Varying total feet on Milliken Blvd,
44 total feet on Elm Ave, and
56 total feet on Church Street.
12.
All existing easements lying within future rights -of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final
map.
13.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.14.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no
map is involved.
15.
Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be
recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
16.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be
installed as required by the City Engineer.
17.
Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from
the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www .cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
19.
Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond
the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map.
20.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of
Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
21.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans .” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
22.
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: Foothill Blvd, Milliken Ave, Church St, Elm Streets
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
Median Island
Bike Lanes
Cycle Track (Class IV)
Etc.
Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
23.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
24.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring .
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be
provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the
construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans
are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans.
Street Name: Foothill, Milliken, Church, and Elm
Botanical Name: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Common Name: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Min. Grow Space: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Spacing: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Size: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Qty.: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
26.
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
27.
All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of
Building Permits: Foothill Blvd; Milliken Ave; Church St; Elm Street.
28.
All public improvements (streets, drainage facilities, interior streets, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on
the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall
include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights,
and street trees.
29.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
30.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.31.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
32.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of
Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for:
33.
Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical
distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution
facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements
and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development.
34.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
Plans for the alarm and /or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
2.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
3.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
4.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building (s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and /or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
6.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
7.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
8.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
9.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
10.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
11.
Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
12.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
13.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
14.
One or more of the systems, operations, processes, or pieces of equipment associated with this project
or the proposed business requires a Fire Code Construction Permit to be issued in accordance with
the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
16.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
17.
Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks
associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is required to be
implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of
foundation form materials. The Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan is required to be in compliance with
Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and
approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The
fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction
permits being approved and issued.
18.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
19.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
20.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
A standpipe system is required to be installed in accordance with Section 905 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
In addition to the standpipe installations required by Section 905.3, standpipes are required to be
installed in the courtyards such that the entire ground floor of all buildings can be reached by a 150-foot
hose pull from the standpipes.
22.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
23.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
24.
Street address and building identification signage for multi -family residential buildings are required to
be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-7. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
26.
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road (s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road (s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
27.
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road (s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road (s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
28.
A new public hydrant is required to be installed within 15-50 feet of the Fire Department Connection
(FDC) and in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10.
29.
The new connection to the public water main requires the submittal of public, off -site fire underground
plans that conform to the standards of the water purveyor and Fire District Standard 5-10.
30.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance
with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and
standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal.
The proposed structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC /CRC
NFPA 13, 13D, 13R and the Current RCFPD Ordinance.
Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA
regulations.
A two hour fire rated tunnel is required where the enclosed courtyard exits through the building at the
wrap building.
Baby changing tables are required in the Clubhouse restrooms as compliant with California State
Assembly Bill AB-1127 and the California Building Code.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical
plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV)
charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code,
section 4.106.4.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
8.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
9.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
10.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
11.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
13.
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations, the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Engineering Services Department Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad
Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils
Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
14.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan )
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
15.
Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
16.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on -site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water
surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All
reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific
drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality
management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
17.
Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway
culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit.
18.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
19.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
20.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
21.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
22.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga ’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
23.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
24.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and /or approval of the project-specific
Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
25.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person /company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells /underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
26.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
27.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
28.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ’s “Memorandum of
Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or
any building permit.
29.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
30.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement (s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
31.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
32.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer ’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
33.
Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
34.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre -treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
36.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non -residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
38.
Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within
multi-family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The
private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the
private street/drive aisle centerline.
39.
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural /treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project ’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R ’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R ’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
40.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 20Printed: 4/21/2022
Planning Department
Statement of Agreement and Acceptance
of Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2021-00120,
Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-
00074
I, Brian Jacobson, as applicant for Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074 hereby state that I am in agreement with and
accept the conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074, for property located at the northwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -
39, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on April 27, 2022 and as listed below and attached.
Applicant Signature____________________________
Date ______________________________
Conditions of Approval
1.The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of
Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and
Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to
the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license,
and/or commencement of the approved activity.
2.All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 22-10 for Master Plan
DRC2022-00074, 22-11 for Design Review DRC2021-00120, and 22-12 for Tentative Tract
Map 20120 (SUBTT00024)
Exhibit R
SUBJECT: LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OF DAYTON DRIVE AND BUFFALO
AVENUE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 -
PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS - A request to operate an 85,026 square foot
Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution (Medium) land use in the Neo
Industrial (NI) District at 11601 Dayton Drive; APN: 0229-262-09.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action:
• Approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00053 through the adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
• A request to operate an 85,026 square foot Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution (Medium)
land use in the Neo Industrial (NI) District.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
The 16-acre project site is developed with an existing 257,095 square foot rail-served industrial
building with 51 dock high doors, 51 trailer parking spaces, and 307 passenger vehicle parking
spaces. The project site is accessed by two vehicle entrances on Buffalo Avenue and one on
Dayton Drive.
The table below provides the existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the
project site and surrounding properties:
A. Project Overview: The applicant has requested to operate a ”Wholesale, Storage, and
Distribution (Medium)” land use in the Neo-Industrial (NI) District. The existing 257,095
DATE: April 27, 2022
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City Manager – Community
Development, Interim Planning Director
INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District
North Industrial Building Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District
South Industrial Building Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District
East Industrial Building Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District
West Industrial Building Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District
Page 2
square foot building was originally occupied entirely by Mission Foods. As they no longer
need this amount of floor area to conduct their operations, the interior of the building will be
divided into two tenant spaces with the applicant (Paramount Logistics) occupying 85,026
square feet and Mission Foods) occupying the remaining 172,069 square feet. The project
site provides the minimum required trailer parking (51) spaces and 180 excess standard
parking spaces as outlined in the following table.
Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking
Wholesale – First
20,000 1:1,000 SF 20 Spaces
Wholesale – Next
20,000 1:2,000 SF 10 Spaces
Wholesale -
Remaining SF
(205,610 SF)
1:4,000 51 Spaces
Office Areas (11,485
SF) 1:250 SF 46 Spaces
Trailer Parking (51
Dock Doors) 1 Per Dock Door 51 Spaces
Total Parking Spaces 127 Vehicle Spaces +
51 Trailer Spaces
307 Vehicle
Spaces +
51 Trailer Spaces
B. Conditional Use Permit: Development Code Table 17.30.030-1 requires that the use of an
existing building for “Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution (Medium)” where the building is
over 50,000 square feet or the tenant will occupy over 50,000 square feet within a building
is subject to Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Wholesale, Storage and Distribution (Medium) is defined in Section 17.32.020 (Allowed use
descriptions) of the Development Code as follows: Activities typically include, but are not
limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services;
storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products;
and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall
be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building
space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of
Wholesale space.
The applicant proposes operating an 85,026 square foot wholesale, storage, and distribution
facility. The business operations consist of transporting cargo containers from the Port of
Long Beach and/or the Port of Los Angeles to the facility (or similar), transferring the various
packages, boxes, etc. from the containers to separate outbound truck trailers (in an
operating environment referred to as a “cross-dock” where there is no long-term storage),
and shipping them to their next destination for further processing. The majority of each cargo
container’s shipment leaves the facility within a week of when it arrives at the facility, i.e.
turnover is within about one week. Approximately 20 percent of the product leaving the
facility will be shipped directly to the consumer via UPS, FedEx, etc.
The proposed facility will operate 24 hours per day in three shifts (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., and 1:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) with a maximum of 25 personnel onsite
during the largest shift (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). There will be minimal change from the
Page 3
current operations of the entire facility by Mission Foods which currently operates on a 24-
hour schedule.
The applicant states that the number of trucks and trails on site will never surpass the
number of available dock doors and trailer parking spaces and that the number of trucks
and trailers entering should be similar to the current operation with Mission Foods occupying
the entire facility. Based on the similarity in business operations, staff determined that a
Parking Management Plan was not required at this time. If truck traffic and parking become
an issue in the future, a Parking Management Plan may be required to remedy any negative
impacts on the surrounding land uses and public infrastructure.
Mission Foods will be separated from the applicant’s tenant space by an interior demising
wall with separate dock-high doors (32 total). They will continue to use their tenant space to
wholesale and store raw food ingredients and finished food products to serve their facilities.
Representatives from Mission Foods have informed staff that they will have approximately
25-30 trailers onsite to support their operation.
Staff has included a Condition of Approval which limits onsite trucks and trailers to the
available number of dock door and trailer parking spaces. The applicant has stated that if in
the future the existing truck/trailer parking exceeds the available onsite number of parking
spaces they will submit the necessary entitlements to reconfigure the existing passenger
vehicle parking lot for use as truck/trailer parking. The project site includes 3 vehicle
entrances which can be used for accessing either tenant space with minimal interference
between the two tenants.
C. Environmental Assessment: Prior to any action being taken for this request, Planning
Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a
Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the operation,
permitting, leasing, or minor alteration of existing structures. The project involves the
operation of an 85,026 square foot Wholesale, storage, and distribution land use within an
existing industrial tenant space that previously housed a similar use of the same type and
intensity. No exterior physical alterations to the building are being proposed with the
application. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that approval of the project will
have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed the
Planning Department’s determination of exemption, and based on his own independent
judgment, concurs with staff’s determination of exemption.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed business will employ approximately 33 persons on three shifts potentially
increasing demand for local services.
COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The project fulfills City Council Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement). By subdividing an
underutilized building, the new business may increase the number of employment opportunities
in the City.
Page 4
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on April 12, 2022, and notices were
mailed to all property owners (10 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April
12, 2022. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these
notifications.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location
Exhibit B - Letter of Business Operation
Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit D - Site Plan
Exhibit E - Floor Plan
Exhibit F - Tenant List with Hours of Operation
Exhibit G - Draft Resolution of Approval 22-13 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00053
Exhibit H - Draft Conditions of Approval
Exhibit I - Statement of Agreement
Exhibit A
4826 4th St
Irwindale, CA 91706
Tel: (626) 575-7988
Fax: (626) 575-7966
Email: info@paramountloginc.com
Business operation
1, Services offered
•Drayage: Pick up ocean containers from the port of Long Beach to our warehouse
•Transloading/Crossdocking: Fast in & out normally within a week. Usually pallet/cartons in &
pallet out within a week.
•Distribution:
a) Customer’s choice on receiving (ocean container, truckload, less than truckload, loose cargo).
b) Inventory management, 24 x 7 real time inventory monitoring
c) Outbound: Full Pallet, case pick, E-commerce (parcel shipping)
Commodity: general merchandise, consumer goods
2, Hour of operation:
•First shift: 8 am – 5 pm full service
•Second shift: 5 pm- 1 am, accepting inbound trailer drop off only, protentional offering full
service
•Third shift: 1 am -8 am in plan for accepting inbound trailer drop off only
3, Number of employees on the largest shift (First Shift)
•10 truck drivers
•10 warehouse employees
•5 office clerical employees
4, The reasons for requesting CUP
•Storage and distribution inside of the warehouse
•Truck & Trailer parking
Exhibit B
600' (TYP.)SUBJECT SITE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
WAREHOUSE
(GI)
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
List of all tenants within the center or complex by name, address,
type of use, square footage, and hours of operation:
Gruma Corporation dba Mission Foods, 11671 Dayton Drive, distribution of bagged flour / tortillas
/ chips and other food-related items, 172,560 square feet, hours of operation are 24 hours M-F,
closed Sat at 830pm and re-open Sunday at 10am.
RESOLUTION NO. 22-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2022-00053, A REQUEST TO OPERATE AN 85,026 SQUARE FOOT
WHOLESALE, STORAGE, AND DISTRIBUTION (MEDIUM) LAND USE IN THE
NEO INDUSTRIAL (NI) DISTRICT AT 11601 DAYTON DRIVE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229-262-09.
A.Recitals.
1.PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit
DRC2022-00053, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 27th day of April 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearings of April 27, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Dayton Drive and Buffalo Avenue;
and
b.The 16-acre project site is developed with an existing 257,095 square foot rail-served
industrial building with 51 dock high doors, 51 trailer parking spaces and 307 passenger vehicle parking
spaces; and
c.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and
adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building Neo Industrial Employment District Neo Industrial (NI) District
North Industrial Building Neo Industrial Employment District Neo Industrial (NI) District
South Industrial Building Neo Industrial Employment District Neo Industrial (NI) District
East Industrial Building Neo Industrial Employment District Neo Industrial (NI) District
West Industrial Building Neo Industrial Employment District Neo Industrial (NI) District
d.The applicant has requested to operate a Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution
(Medium) land use in the Neo Industrial (NI) District. The existing 257,095 square foot building will be
divided into two tenant spaces with the applicant (Paramount Logistics) occupying 85,026 square feet
and the existing tenant (Mission Foods) occupying the remaining 172,069 square feet. The project site
Exhibit G
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-13
DRC2022-00053 – PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS
April 27, 2022
Page 2
provides the minimum required trailer parking (51) spaces and 307 passenger vehicle parking spaces,
which is 180 spaces in excess of the required number of parking spaces; and
e. Development Code Table 17.30.030-1 requires that Wholesale, Storage, and
Distribution (Medium) land uses over 50,000 square feet in area require Planning Commission approval
of a Conditional Use Permit; and
f. The applicant proposes operating an 85,026 square foot wholesale, storage, and
distribution facility. The business operations consist of transporting cargo containers from the Port of
Long Beach and/or the Port of Los Angeles to the facility (or similar), transferring the various packages,
boxes, etc. from the containers to separate outbound truck trailers (in an operating environment referred
to as a “cross-dock” where there is no long-term storage), and shipping them to their next destination for
further processing. The majority of each cargo container’s shipment leaves the facility within a week of
when it arrives at the facility, i.e. turnover is within about one week. Approximately 20 percent of the
product leaving the facility will be shipped directly to the consumer via UPS, FedEx, etc.; and
g. The proposed facility will operate 24 hours per day in three shifts (8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., and 1:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) with a maximum of 25 personnel onsite during
the largest shift (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). There will be minimal change from the current operations of the
entire facility by Mission Foods which currently operates on a 24-hour schedule; and
h. The applicant states that the number of trucks and trailers on site will never surpass the
number of available dock doors and trailer parking spaces and that the number of trucks and trailers
entering should be similar to the current operation with Mission Foods occupying the entire facility. Based
on the similarity in business operations, staff determined that a Parking Management Plan was not
required at this time. If truck traffic and parking become an issue in the future, a Parking Management
Plan may be required to remedy any negative impacts on the surrounding land uses and public
infrastructure.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use
designation for the project site is Neo Industrial Employment District which permits a wide variety of
industrial land uses including wholesale, storage, and distribution; and b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the development code and the
purposes of the applicable zoning district as well as any applicable specific plans or city
regulations/standards. Wholesale, storage, and distribution land uses are permitted within the Neo
Industrial (NI) District subject to Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being
proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of
the use undesirable. The project site is developed with an existing 257,075 square foot industrial building
that is surrounded by industrial development and is served by existing utilities and includes vehicle
access from two adjacent public streets and a rail spur line; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-13
DRC2022-00053 – PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS
April 27, 2022
Page 3
d. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be
compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service
facilities. The proposed use is located in an existing industrial building and is surrounded by similar
wholesale, storage, and distribution land uses with similar operating characteristics; and
e. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The applicant is not
proposing any new activities which were not already occurring with the existing tenant beyond
subdividing the existing tenant space into two tenant spaces. The proposed business will operate within
the confines of the existing number of dock doors and trailer parking spaces that currently exist. All
activities will take place on the project site, and the adjacent roadways were designed to accommodate a
wholesale use with the level of proposed vehicle trips. Thus, the project is not expected to: 1) create any
property damage or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration, or illumination caused by the use;
create hazards to persons or property from possible explosions, contamination, fire or flood caused by
the use; or 3) significantly increase the volume of traffic or negatively alter the pattern of traffic; and
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire,
streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to
the use. The proposed is not expected to pose a burden on city services beyond that which is typical for
a similarly sized wholesale, storage, and distribution land use.
g. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the operation, permitting, and leasing, of existing structures. No
changes are proposed to the project site. 4. Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1
exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the operation, permitting, leasing,
or minor alteration of existing structures. The project involves the operation of an 85,026 square foot
wholesale, storage, and distribution land use. No exterior physical alterations to the building are being
proposed with the application. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that approval of the project
will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning
Department’s determination of exemption, and based on his own independent judgment, concurs with
staff’s determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the
Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22-13
DRC2022-00053 – PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS
April 27, 2022
Page 4
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP
I, Matthew R. Burris, Secretary, AICP, LEED AP, of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,
and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2022, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2022-00053
Project Name: Paramount Logistics - CUP
Location: 11601 DAYTON DR - 022926209-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The number of onsite trailers/trucks shall not exceed the available onsite dock doors/trailer parking
spaces.
1.
Trucks/trailers shall not queue on the public streets while waiting for access to the facility.2.
If truck traffic or truck/trailer parking become an issue in the future, a Parking Management Plan may be
required to remedy any negative impacts on the surrounding land uses and public infrastructure.
3.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
4.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such
action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. In the
event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The applicant shall
deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they
become due.
5.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
6.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
7.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/20/2022
Exhibit H
Project #: DRC2022-00053
Project Name: Paramount Logistics - CUP
Location: 11601 DAYTON DR - 022926209-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and /or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and /or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
8.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
9.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
If egress lighting needs to be provided, or if existing egress lighting needs to be modified, plans for the
egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans
to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
1.
If storage operations will include high piled combustible storage, a high piled combustible storage
analysis and all associated plans are required to be submitted separately and issued separate permits .
Please see Fire District Standard 32-1. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing
to the Fire District.
2.
If new storage racks will be installed or existing storage racks relocated, plans for the racks are required
to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety
Department for routing to the Fire District.
3.
If modifications to the automatic fire sprinkler system are needed, plans for the modifications are
required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building &
Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
4.
If not already provided with the correct signage, exterior doors and doors providing access to fire
protection and life safety systems and equipment are required to have identification signage in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
5.
If the existing emergency egress needs to be modified, provide an exit analysis complete with exit width
capacity calculations, the required number and arrangement of exits, path of egress travel distances,
and a main exit designation and capacity calculation where applicable.
6.
If the storage operation will include high -piled combustible storage, such storage and associated
protection systems are required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and Fire District
Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in scheduling
inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 3Printed: 4/20/2022
Project #: DRC2022-00053
Project Name: Paramount Logistics - CUP
Location: 11601 DAYTON DR - 022926209-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Storage of Class I-IV commodities above 12 feet or High Hazard commodities above 6 feet is not
allowed without an approved high -piled combustible storage permit issued by the Fire District. Please
see Fire District Standard 32-1. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
8.
If not already provided specifically for the lease space, a Knox Box key box is required in accordance
with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building,
the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire
District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is
available to this project or business, keys for the building /suite/unit are required to be provided to the
Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
9.
One or more of the operations proposed for this building /business may require a Fire Code Operating
Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
10.
A Fire Final Inspection is required prior to final inspection and approval by the Building Department.11.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings for all proposed
tenant improvements including energy calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance
with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards
which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal.
Modifications to the existing automatic fire sprinklers are required to be a separate submittal /permit
from the tenant improvement submittal/permit.
Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA
regulations.
If there is any plumbing work on your plans please contact CVWD ASAP (Local water district ), their
turnaround timeline is 4-6 weeks to grant a plumbing first release. A “Plumbing First Release” is
required before B&S issues a demolition or TI permit when there is plumbing involved.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 3Printed: 4/20/2022
Planning Department
Statement of Agreement and Acceptance
of Conditions of Approval for
Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00053
I, _____________________, as applicant for Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00053, hereby
state that I am in agreement with and accept the Conditions of Approval for above-mentioned
applications, for property located at 11601 Dayton Drive.; APN: 0229-262-09, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
Applicant Signature____________________________
Date ______________________________
Conditions of Approval
1.The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of
Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and
Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to
the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license,
and/or commencement of the approved activity.
2.All other conditions of approval related to Resolution of Approval 22-13 for Conditional Use
Permit DRC2022-00053.
Exhibit I
Page 1
DATE: April 27, 2022
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City Manager – Community Development,
Interim Planning Director
INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning
SUBJECT:
Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council to Adopt a Comprehensive
revision to Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, Adopt a Revised Zoning Map and Repeal or Amend Several Specific Plans,
Planned Communities and Master Plans to Implement the Goals and Policies of
the General Plan. This Item Will be Forwarded to City Council for Final Action.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending the City Council adopt an
addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) SCH# 2021050261 and adopt a series of
amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code that will do the following:
Adopt a comprehensive revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to implement the goals and
policies of the recently adopted General Plan, including, but not limited to:
• Develop implementing zones for all General Plan land use designations;
• Add a new Article implementing form based zoning for specific mixed use zones;
• Incorporate key standards from Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the Development Code;
• Revise permit procedures to streamline development review;
• Comply with State Law; and
Adopt a revised Zoning Map:
• Establishes new zoning districts that implement the General Plan land use designations;
• Removes Specific Plans, Master Plans, Planned Communities and Overlay Zones; and
Repeal the following Specific Plans, Master Plans, Planned Communities and Overlay Zones:
• Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit Development;
• Etiwanda North Specific Plan;
• Etiwanda Specific Plan;
• Terra Vista Community Plan;
• Town Square Master Plan;
• Victoria Community Plan;
• Foothill Boulevard Overlay;
• Haven Avenue Overlay;
• Mixed Use Overlay;
• Industrial Commercial Overlay; and
Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan to change the boundary and rename to The Resort Specific Plan;
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
On December 15, 2021, the City Council unanimously adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The General Plan is the City’s blueprint, or constitution, for future development. It documents the
City’s long-range vision and established clear goals, objectives and actions to guide the community through the
next 10 to 20 years of change. The City Council initiated this update process, referred to as PlanRC, to be
compliant with changes in state law and to build on our success as a world class community to create a
balanced, vibrant and innovative city. This comprehensive General Plan Update addresses issues and
challenges facing the City, including diversifying employment opportunities, expanding housing and mobility
choice and preserving the character, history, and quality of life that make Rancho Cucamonga a special place
to live. The updated General Plan will advance the City’s vision for a sustainable, resilient, equitable and healthy
community.
While the General Plan is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and
implementation strategy to support future development in Rancho Cucamonga, the Development Code
implements General Plan policies through detailed development regulations, such as specific use types and
building standards. Although the purpose and intent of zoning is different from the General Plan, state law
requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities
are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the zoning of the
property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a general plan amendment, the City must
enact a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time.
The adoption of the General Plan has spurred development interest and is resulting in an increase in
applications for large-scale projects. Currently, there are over 1,700 residential units and approximately 64,000
square feet of commercial development in the pipeline along the major corridors in the southern portion of the
city. The current Development Code is not consistent with the intent of the character-based General Plan Land
Use Designations and does not contain the necessary standards to implement the General Plan vision for
walkable, mixed-use places. City staff have been working with a consultant team on amendments to the
Development Code and Zoning Map to implement the Land Use Designations in the updated General Plan,
including the addition of form-based code components for the new mixed-use place types established in the
General Plan.
ANALYSIS:
The goals of the Development Code update are to codify the community’s vision as established in the General
Plan update process, increase certainty in the development review process, and facilitate implementation of key
General Plan concepts related to land use and urban design. A primary objective is to integrate form-based
regulations in appropriate areas, such as along Foothill Boulevard, to promote pedestrian activity and transition
these areas from auto-oriented to more walkable and urban configurations. Fundamental elements of the
Development Code update are:
• A hybrid Development Code that integrates form-based and conventional zones.
• New form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use areas along Foothill Boulevard and other
key corridors.
• Incorporation of appropriate standards from older Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the
new zoning regulations to allow for repeal of outdated plans.
• New objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use development projects.
• Revisions to conventional zones as needed to implement the land use vision of the General Plan.
• Revised general development standards to address General Plan policy or existing deficiencies with
respect to landscaping, open space, and noise, among others as needed.
• Improved administration and permit procedures to streamline development review for projects
consistent with the General Plan and ensure adequate tools for enforcement of the Code.
• Compliance with State and Federal law.
• Consistency with the updated General Plan.
Page 3
General Plan Consistency
The existing Development Code was reviewed for consistency with the goals and policies of the adopted
General Plan. Where a gap or inconsistency was identified, the Development Code was amended to provide
adequate provisions to facilitate development in alignment with the policy direction of the General Plan. In
addition, the intent and purpose of each General Plan land use designation was assessed to determine whether
the designation could be implemented with an existing zoning district or if a new zone was needed.
Recommendations to implement the General Plan and the creation of new form-based zones to implement the
new mixed-use land use designations are described below.
Implementation of the General Plan Vision
To successfully achieve the City’s vision and uphold the core values identified by the community during the
PlanRC process, the General Plan is designed around strengthening Rancho Cucamonga’s sense of identity
and character by creating places where people want to be and improving their ability to move around. The
overarching strategy is one of human-scaled design, with buildings and outdoor spaces oriented towards people
connected by safe and comfortable streets, pathways, and trails that provide equitable access for all. The General
Plan organizes the city into districts, centers, corridors, and neighborhoods, with an overall vision for greater
walkability centered around nodes of activity.
Vision Diagram
Page 4
The Land Use and Community Character Chapter of the General Plan describes and defines the distinct types
of places—or “place types”—that the City aims to create to achieve the vision. The General Plan unifies the
inseparable topics of land use and community character and design into a single chapter to ensure that the
uses, experiences, and activities that current and future community members enjoy in our city cannot be
divorced from our vision for the unique look, feel, character, ambiance and quality of life that we enjoy in Rancho
Cucamonga.
Given the City’s broad place-making goals and the community’s interest in shaping the form and character of
the city, the General Plan uses “place type” designations that go beyond conventional land use designations to
better define the existing and intended character, form, and function of each part of the city. Each place type is
organized into designations that provide direction on the intended range of uses, appropriate levels of
development density and intensity, and intended physical design character. The Land Plan is illustrated below
and is also available on the City’s website: https://bit.ly/gplandplan.
Land Plan
Page 5
Form-Based Code
The Form-Based Code (FBC) implements the General Plan’s vision, place type designations, and policy
direction for key areas of the city, including the major corridors, focus areas and activity nodes. The FBC, which
is Article VIII of Title 17 (Development Code), establishes place-based standards for certain areas that are
intended to promote pedestrian activity, encourage a diversity of uses, accommodate new housing typologies,
and facilitate the transition of auto-oriented areas to more walkable and urban places. The FBC represents an
alternative to a conventional zoning code’s approach to the way the built environment is regulated.
The definition of a Form-Based Code is as follows: “Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and a
high-quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for
the code. These codes are adopted into city or county law as regulations, not mere guidelines. Form-Based
Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.” (Source: Form-Based Codes Institute) Unlike conventional,
use-based codes, FBCs utilize the intended form and character of a neighborhood rather than use as the
organizing framework of the code. FBCs address the relationship between building facades and the public realm
(i.e., sidewalk, street), the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types of
buildings and blocks.
Regulations and standards in the FBC are presented graphically in diagrams and photographs as well as
supplemental text. These standards are keyed to the zoning map, assigning an appropriate form and scale
through the application of form-based zones to specific lots for key areas of the city where mixed use urban
form is desired. The remainder of the city uses conventional zoning as regulated by Article III of the Development
Code. While the FBC focuses on an intended physical form, it also regulates use by allowing a mix of appropriate
land uses chosen to ensure compatibility among different contexts and the intended physical form of the area.
The FBC is intended to transform our commercial corridors and centers into vibrant, mixed-use areas where
residents can live, work, and play within close walking distance.
Article VIII is organized around the following regulating topic areas:
• Zone and Building Standards: establishes purpose and intent of building type standards, standards that
are applicable to all form-based zones and building types, descriptions of each building type, and
objective development standards associated with each building type.
• Building Entrances and Facades: establishes purpose and intent of building entrance and facade type
standards, descriptions of each building entrance and facade type, and objective development standards
associated with each type.
• Public Open Space: establishes purpose and intent of public open space standards, descriptions of each
public open space type, and objective development standards associated with each type.
• Land Use Standards: establishes the land uses allowed in each form-based zone and any necessary
specific use standards.
Page 6
• Large Site Development: provides requirements for large site development including applicability, intent
and design review requirements; and establishes block size and connectivity standards.
Objective Design Standards
Another key component of the updated Development Code is new objective design standards for multi-family
residential and mixed-use development projects to respond to changes in state law and facilitate housing
production. State law defines objective standards as those that “involve no personal or subjective judgement
by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion
available and knowable by both the development applicant and public official prior to submittal.” They are
measurable and verifiable (i.e., no “gray area” for interpretation) to make the design review process more
streamlined, predictable, and easier to interpret.
The purpose of objective design standards is for applicants to know beforehand what requirements apply to a
proposed development and for the applicant to be able to design a project that meets those requirements
before submittal. Objective design standards are written as requirements, rather than guidelines, and will
provide applicants and developers with a clear understanding of the City’s expectations for mixed-use and
multi-family residential project design to help streamline the review process. Objective design standards that
are intended to complement all base zoning districts are contained in Article VII, while objective standards
specifically aimed at mixed use and multi-family development in the form-based zones are integrated into Article
VIII.
Repeal of Older Specific Plans, Master Plans and Planned Communities
Part of the Development Code update includes the incorporation of appropriate standards from older specific
plans, master plans and planned communities into the new zoning regulations to allow for the repeal of outdated
plans. In many instances these original plans are fully built out, and in others revisions to the code will
supersede the need for the specialized zoning or standards allowed by the specific plan, master plan or planned
community. Because many of the City’s specific plans, master plans and planned communities were prepared
over 30 years ago, they are difficult to interpret and amendments are often required to accommodate different
types of development not contemplated in the 1980s and 1990s.
The following is the list of specific plans, master plans and planned communities to be repealed with adoption
of the updated Development Code:
• Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit Development (EH) 1988 - Repeal
• Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) 1992- Repeal
• Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) 1985 - Repeal
• Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP) 1983 - Repeal
• Town Square Master Plan (TS) 2002 - Repeal
• Victoria Arbors Master Plan (VA) 2002 - Repeal
• Victoria Community Plan (VCP) 1981 - Repeal
• Empire Lakes Specific Plan (ELSP) (Also referred to as IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan) 1994 – Amend
to change boundary and renamed to The Resort Specific Plan
In order to maintain compatibility of new infill development and to avoid the creation of non-conforming uses
and structures, applicable standards from these plans have been incorporated into the new form-based zones
and/or integrating into the Development Code through the use of subzones, which are subsets of the primary
conventional zone. Subzones align with the primary zone development standards and use requirements except
where otherwise noted to maintain the necessary standards of the repealed plan. Because of inconsistencies
between the Development Code, the regulations of the repealed plans, and what is built, the Development
Code includes provisions for staff to allow flexibility based on existing development that may become non-
conforming.
Page 7
Legal Consistency
Legal requirements relative to this code update were analyzed and where the Development Code was
determined to be out of compliance, amendments to the code were made. The following topic areas were
amended to bring the City’s Development Code into compliance with state and federal law:
• Special needs housing, including community care facilities, family day care homes, emergency shelters,
farmworker housing
• Accessory dwelling units
• Manufactured homes
• Telecommunications facilities, including review of wireless telecommunications facilities and
acceleration of broadband deployment
• Density bonuses, incentives and concessions
• Fine-tuning of permit review requirements
General Code Issues
In addition, and as part of the process, the consultant for the Development Code update led a series staff
interviews with representatives from the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Building and Safety
Department, Animal Services and Community Improvement Division to identify opportunities to clarify code
content, address existing deficiencies, or improve usability. The following topics were amended to address staff
identified issues:
• Amendments to review applicability and process language for a variety of application types for clarity.
• Changes to home occupation permit regulations to prohibit home based businesses performing
ammunition recycling.
• Removal of the planned community process which is not used anymore and changes to specific plan
size threshold.
• Modifications to the allowed use table and descriptions for certain allowed uses.
• Updates to development standards for residential zones to allow for more residential types to expand
opportunities for a range of residential development.
• Removal of several Overlay Zoning Districts that are no longer applicable with the amendments to the
code and the inclusion of the form-based code. The Overlays to be removed include:
Industrial/Commercial, Foothill Boulevard, Mixed Use, and Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning Districts.
• Changes to requirements and exceptions for certain accessory structures.
• Reductions of guest parking standards for residential uses.
• Addition of parking management standards to address spillover parking from large projects into adjacent
residential neighborhoods.
• Updates animal keeping standards to make them easier to apply and enforce and to allow for a wider
variety of pets on smaller lot sizes.
• Comprehensive update to general design provisions and design provisions by development type.
• Revisions to the Zoning Map for consistency with the General Plan and Development Code and to
implement the new Form-Based Zones.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
PlanRC Engagement Process
A primary purpose of the Development Code update is for consistency with, and implementation of, the recently
adopted General Plan, which reflects the vision and core values of the community. The City started PlanRC,
the name for the General Plan Update process, in January 2020. Throughout the nearly two-year process
leading up to General Plan adoption, the City conducted a robust engagement effort with the public. Community
input was solicited and reflected throughout each phase of the planning process. PlanRC involved longtime
residents, new residents, seniors, youth, clubs, organizations, business owners, developers, and many more.
As a city rich in its mix of ethnicities, cultures and identities, the engagement for PlanRC worked to provide
consistent equitable and inclusive community engagement practices throughout the process.
Page 8
Although in-person outreach was extremely limited due to COVID-19 constraints, the community adapted and
found meaningful ways to get involved in PlanRC through digital engagement platforms. Engagement efforts
prioritized determining values and ideas for the future of the city related to land use, housing, mobility,
recreation, and economic development. There were several online surveys, events, and workshops that
focused solely on community character, land use, and placemaking, which are implemented by the zoning and
standards in the Development Code. Throughout the two-year process, PlanRC received input from over 2,300
community members through online surveys and virtual meetings and generated over 1.1 million digital
impressions through various social media platforms. The Development Code, in particular the Form-Based
Code, is one of the implementing tools for the General Plan vision, and therefore reflects the ideas, values and
input of the community.
Development Code Update Focus Group Meeting
In addition to the significant amount of community input received during the PlanRC process, staff also
conducted a virtual Development Code Update Focus Group Discussion on November 3, 2021. This focus
group meeting included Building Industry Association (BIA) members and several developers. The intent of
the meeting was to inform and engage key stakeholders about the Development Code update and collect
feedback on the current code and opportunities for improvement.
Some input received from stakeholders that were addressed in the development code included suggestions for
lower guest parking requirements, allowing for shared parking between uses in mixed use areas and flexibility
in design for accommodating parking as well as recommendations for future development of parking
management plans. In addition, stakeholders requested clear process requirements and objective standards
that provide more certainty in desired outcome and streamlining in development review, and more flexibility in
certain lot and site planning requirements without having to do a zone change or code amendment.
The public review draft of the Development Code and Zoning Map were published to the City’s website on April
7, 2022. This item was also noticed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 18, 2022 with an 1/8th page legal
ad. In addition, a study session was held with the Planning Commission on April 13, 2022.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In approving the General Plan update in December 2021, the City Council certified the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City has
reviewed the proposed Development Code Update against the General Plan EIR and determined the EIR
adequately addresses all the environmental issues associated with the project. The proposed project would
not result in any new significant impacts on the environment based upon the analysis and conclusions
presented in the General Plan EIR. In addition, previously identified significant impacts would not be
substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. Finally, no new feasible mitigation measures have
been identified that would substantially reduce significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Therefore,
staff has prepared an EIR Addendum (Attachment 2) for the Development Code Update. Unlike an EIR, an
Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of these new interim standards will facilitate future development consistent with the vision outlined
in the General Plan. The General Plan vision for denser, mixed use urban centers can help Rancho
Cucamonga maintain a high level of fiscal performance and become a regional destination and focal point of
activity.
Page 9
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Updating the Development Code and Zoning Map to implement the General Plan and Housing Element
achieves multiple City Council Core Values, including providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all,
promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and intentionally embracing and anticipating
the future, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and more. Furthermore, these updates
support the City Council’s goal of completing the General Plan and Housing Element.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Public Review Draft Development Code
Exhibit B – Public Review Draft Zoning Map
Exhibit C – EIR Addendum
Exhibit D – Resolution
Exhibit A
The Public Review Draft of the Development Code is
available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Development Code (Title 17)
Hillside Rd
Banyan St
19th St
Base Line Rd
Foothill Bl
Arrow Rt
8th St
> <(
Q) > e CJ
C: .ro
Q)
ro le;)
• l
--------
> <(
Cll >, Q) C: >
4th St
�
C: ro E
Q) I
> <(
C: ro E
Q) I
> <(
-0 ro
_Q .c: 0,._ <(
■1111111111111111111!, .... ,� .. � ''"''''''""m'J.I■ I Ill!! !!111111: � :.. ,ii ;;111111: ;; •............... �.., ■I1111,lliil
> <( ro 1/) 0 E ,._ Q) I
ii _,1111111111111••"'''"''"�"''"'"" .. , .. ,!IUIH "''""'""'""• ,,1111111" 1111"� 111111 11mn111111m,�:� ••'"""" '"'" 111111 •""""''"""
,,111111• """"""
> <(
C: Q) > ro I
--_, -.,.. -.,,.
.-------------.i·• 11111111111,, .... 111111111• = �•• 1u11111■: S,�,:��mm:r: �Jin\ ,111,, S.,,1111 ... , .. f:: ,. .. ,1111111r,:-$ ............ ;: � ... 111111'1 ......... 11,t; , .... 111111, ltr,,"111 lllllf; ........... �II 1■rf ...... Ill'.
•
■
■■-■--=·•···............ r•1111-............ . ;1,.;;11 ·-.............. • i=■I !!111i ■■II■
I •
111 - r, -•-
·----, . --
�
Q)
1/) Q) .c: 0
Ill •••• •ri_, -· .... tir1 ■I ■ I••·-· =... ; Ill ··••! �
-
■
-= -
' '
:,11!:i: :.,r• ====== '!tn11nu:i 1!'1111 111111..... 111111 llllfl 1111,:j 0:.1,1111111 • �•1111111111 : ........... ..... 11111 1111.II! 0:.11111 .... ;! �11111 1111� ,.,1111111 11no."I f11111 111111 : 111111111111 ;:; ......... = if�III llllll,ii
••i.::=i..:: =�"ill •-------' ............. .., •. 11111 1111111, .............. ,, r •:!11111 1111111111 -............ . : l"IIIIII HJ•� -....... , .. ,�.· : .... 111111 .. ,. : .. ;. ■
-· _I-----------------------------------------i r -------------------------------·
> > <( I.() > <( <( C: � ' Q) Q)ro --0 -"' 1/) C: Q) ro .c: -� � 0 0 -
0::: w
Ill
> <( -1/) ro w
Base Line Rd
Foothill Bl
----------= ----------------I
I ,I lj 1, !1
SR-210
Rancho
Zoning Map
Zones -----------
OS Open Space
HR Hillside Residential
OS Open Space, FC Flood Control, UC Utility Corridor
VL Very Low Residential
EHNCP
L Low Residential
LM Low Medium Residential
M Medium Residential
MH Medium High Residential
H High Residential
NI Neo Industrial
GI General Industrial
Form Based Zones
-NG3 Neighborhood General 3 Zone----COl Corridor 1 Zone
CO2 Corridor 2 Zone
NG3-L Neighborhood General 3 -Limited
CEl Center 1 Zone
CE2 Center 2 Zone
-Center 2 Limited
ME2 Mixed Employment 2 Zone
MEl Mixed Employment 1 Zone
-NE2 Neighborhood Estate 2
Subzones
1222]
1222] --VL-EH 9000 Very Low Residential -Etiwanda Highlands 9000
VL-EH 14000 Very Low Residential -Etiwanda Highlands 14000
L-ESP Low Residential -Etiwanda Specific Plan
LM-ESP Low Medium Residential -Etiwanda Specific Plan --LM-ESP South Low Medium Residential -Etiwanda Specific Plan South
M-ESP Medium Residential -Etiwanda Specific Plan-
1222]
M-ESP South Medium Residential -Etiwanda Specific Plan South
LM-TV Low Medium Residential -Terra Vista
M-TVl Medium Residential -Terra Vista 1
M-TV2 Medium Residential -Terra Vista 2
1222]
�
1222] MH-TV Medium High Residential -Terra Vista
� H-TV High Residential -Terra Vista
Overlays •= :1 Cucamonga Station Overlay •= :1 Equestrian Overlay •= :1 Hillside Overlay Per Ord. 628
':. : Senior Housing Overlay
Specific Plans
[IIl The Resort Specific Plan
[IIl Etiwanda Heights Neigborhood Conservation Plan
Master Plans
E::I Victoria Gardens Master Plan
Corridor Frontages
-Corridor Fronting Retail
-Corridor Fronting Commercial = Corridor Fronting Residential
-F reeway
- -· City Limits
N
0 0.25
1 ..
0.5
2 , 2 0 0
1
f e e t
Miles
1.5
The geographic information available by and through City of Rancho Cucamonga is
presented as a public resource of general information. The information may include both
map data and data provided by applications. While the City of Rancho Cucamonga strives
to maintain the accuracy of the content of its data files, it makes no claims, promises, or
guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the files.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga assumes no responsibility arising from use of the
information provided. No warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, including but not
limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for particular purposes is
made. It is the responsibility of the recipient of this data to determine that the level of
accuracy meets the needs of their application prior to making any judgments or decisions
based on this information. Do not make any business decisions based on this data before
validating your decision with the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 22-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF (1) A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY TO IMPLEMENT THE GOALS
AND POLICIES OF THE GENERAL PLAN, ADOPT A FORM BASED
CODE FOR SPECIFIED AREAS, INCLUDE OBJECTIVE DESIGN
STANDARDS, AND STAFF IDENTIFIED ISSUES; (2) A ZONING MAP
AMENDMENT TO ADOPT A NEW ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY; (3)
REPEAL THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC PLANS, MASTER PLANS AND
PLANNED COMMUNITIES: ETIWANDA HIGHLANDS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN, TERRA VISTA COMMUNTIY PLAN, TOWN SQUARE
MASTER PLAN, VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, AND VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN; (4) A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO AMEND
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE IASP SUB AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN) AND
RENAME TO THE RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN; AND (5) AN ADDENDUM
TO THE CERTIFIED EIR FOR THE PLAN RC GENERAL PLAN ADOPTED
IN 2021, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a set of amendments, as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment
is referred to as “the Amendments”.
2. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on April 27, 2022, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The City adopted a new General Plan, Climate Action Plan and Housing Element
on December 15, 2021;
b. State law requires cities to adopt development or zoning codes that are
consistent with their General Plan;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 27, 2022
Page 2
c. The City is proposing to amend its current Development Code, Zoning Map and
related special planning documents to be consistent with the adopted General Plan;
d. The City prepared the Amendments, which are included as Attachments A and
B to this Resolution and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full;
e. The proposed Development Code Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment,
amendment of special planning documents (Specific Plans, Master Plans, and Planned
Communities) conform to and do not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation,
the Land Use Element thereof (as amended), and will provide for development in a manner
consistent with the General Plan;
f. The Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are also
consistent with the proposed Planning Community, Specific Plan, and Master Plan amendments
included herein.
3. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local
CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report
(SCH #2021050261) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed changes
do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new
information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which
implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have
occurred. The proposed project would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to
the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new
mitigation measures or alternatives. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of
environmental review. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the Planning
Commission concurs with the Planning Department staff’s determination that the Amendment will
not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further
environmental review under CEQA. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council
adopt the proposed addendum.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Municipal Code
Amendment as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Zoning Map Amendment
as indicated in Attachment B incorporated herein by this reference.
6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council repeal the Etiwanda Highlands
Planned Unit Development, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Terra Vista
Community Plan, Town Square Master Plan, Victoria Arbors Master Plan, and Victoria Community
Plan.
7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve a Specific Plan Amendment
amending the boundaries of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan (previously called the IASP Sub-Area
18 Specific Plan) and renaming the plan The Resort Specific Plan as indicated in Attachment C
incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 27, 2022
Page 3
8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Secretary
I, Matthew R. Burris, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2022, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 27, 2022
Page 4
Attachment A – Development Code Amendment
The Public Review Draft of the Development Code is available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Development Code (Title 17)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 27, 2022
Page 5
Attachment B – Zoning Map Amendment
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 27, 2022
Page 6
Attachment C – Revised Boundaries of The Resort Specific Plan
March 2022 | General Plan EIR Addendum
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR
SCH No. 2021050261
FOR THE
INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING
STANDARDS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact: Jennifer Nakamura
Deputy Director of Planning
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
909.477.2700
Prepared by:
PlaceWorks
Contact: Mark Teague, AICP, Managing Principal
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, California 92707
714.966.9220
info@placeworks.com
www.placeworks.com
Exhibit D
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
March 2022 Page i
Section Page
1. ADDENDUM TO THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN EIR ............................................................... 3
1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM ........................................................................................................... 3
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 5
1.4 GENERAL PLAN EIR ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2. CEQA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Tabl es Page
TABLE 1 SPECIFIC PLANS AND MASTER PLANS REVISED OR REPEALED WITH ZONING CODE
UPDATE ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
TABLE 2 TABLE 2. GENERAL PLAN MODIFY EXISTING ZONING .............................................................. 9
Figures Page
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
Page ii March 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 3 March 2022
1. Addendum to the Certified General Plan EIR
1.1 PURPOSE
This document serves as the environmental documentation for adoption of the Interim Development Code
(project, proposed project) and Zoning Map to be in compliance with the General Plan. This document is an
addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified on December 15, 2021 (State
Clearinghouse Number 2021050261), which demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR adequately
addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and that none
of the conditions described in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162,
exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not necessary.
1.2 BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2021, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the environmental impact report and
adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). The General Plan is the City’s
blueprint, or constitution, for future development. The General Plan documents the City’s long-range vision
and established clear goals, objectives, and actions to guide the community through the next 20 years.
While the General Plan is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and
implementation strategy to support future development in Rancho Cucamonga, the development code
implements general plan policies through detailed development regulations, such as specific use types and
building standards. Although the purpose and intent of zoning is different from the General Plan, State law
requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities
are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the zoning of the
property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a general plan amendment, the city must enact
a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time.
The current development code is not consistent with the intent of the character-based General Plan Land Use
Designations and does not contain the necessary standards to implement the General Plan vision for walkable,
mixed-use places. As a result, proposed Interim Development Code is designed to implement the Land Use
Designations in the General Plan, including the addition of form-based code components for the new mixed-
use place types established in the General Plan. As the City is under development pressure to implement the
newly adopted General Plan, the adoption of the Interim Development Code as an urgency ordinance will
allow the City to begin implementing the General Plan immediately.
1.3 Purpose of an EIR Addendum
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), an addendum shall be prepared if some changes or additions
to a previously certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated in CEQA Guidelines
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 4 March 2022
Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR have occurred. As stated in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations):
When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR
shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in
the previous EIR;
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections
15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects requiring major revisions to the
General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines
Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General
Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental document to address changes to the project.
As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR):
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified
EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 5
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical
changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162
calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached
to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted
negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section
15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the
project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial
evidence.
A copy of this addendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is to adopt an Interim Development Code to implement the Land Use Designation in
the General Plan as an urgency ordinance. The Interim Development Code contains provisions to ensure that
land development is consistent with the policy direction of the General Plan. As the current Development
Code was comprehensively updated in 2012, the recommendations included in the proposed project include
amendments to standards and requirements within the existing structure and format of the Code (Development
Code Update City of Rancho Cucamonga, page 3). These recommendations include topics such as General
Plan Implementation and General Code Issues, Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Objective Design Standards, and
Specific Plan and Master Plan Analysis. The fundamental elements of the Development Code update are:
• Integrating and modifying the form-based and conventional zones.
• New form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use areas along Foothill Boulevard and other
key corridors.
• Incorporation of appropriate standards from older Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the
new zoning regulations to allow for repeal of outdated plans.
• New objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use development projects to
respond to changes in state law and facilitate housing production.
• Improved administration and permit procedures to streamline development review for projects
consistent with the General Plan and ensure adequate tools for enforcement of the Development
Code.
The implementation of the General Plan is generally managed by the Development Code (Title 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code). The Development Code includes zoning districts consistent with the
General Plan and applies development standards to each zoning district that guide site layout, key design
elements, and development intensity. The proposed project also includes objective design standards for mixed
used and multi-family development as form-based elements that will be applied to base zoning districts.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 6 March 2022
As shown below in Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Replaces with Interim Zoning Code Update and
referenced in the General Plan EIR (Land Use and Planning, page 5.11-16), several of the existing plans in the
city would be reappealed and changed to comply with the new standards of the Interim Development Code
Update.
Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Repealed with Interim Zoning Code Update
Plan/Year Adopted or Amended Notes on Review
Empire Lakes Specific Plan (ELSP) (Also
referred to as IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific
Plan) 1994 adopted/2016 last revised
Amend the ELSP boundary to cover area as required by the Development
Agreement, with those regulations, requirements, and standards remaining in place.
The remaining ELSP areas will be regulated by policy and standards in the General
Plan Update. Areas regulated by the General Plan Update will be implemented with
the citywide code (including new form-based districts, and design standards).
Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit
Development (EH) 1988
Repeal – Develop two new zone districts (e.g., VL- EH 9000 and VL-EH 14000) to
regulate this area, consistent with the standards in the existing Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Standards not regulated by the PUD would be regulated in the
new zone districts. All other standards and procedures applicable to the VL District
would apply to the VL-EH Districts.
Etiwanda North Specific Plan (NESP) 1992 Repeal – A portion of this Plan area was amended and now regulated by the
Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan. The portion identified for low density residential can
be regulated by the existing Low Residential District standards. The remaining area
will be regulated by the Traditional Neighborhood Land Use Designation and
subsequent zoning district and the zoning that replaces the Etiwanda Highlands
Planned Unit Development (see above).
Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) 1985
adopted/2000 last revised
Repeal – A small area will be regulated by the new form-based zoning district based
on General Plan placetype. Regulate the Very Low density area with the existing
Very Low Residential District. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining
areas consistent with the standards in the Specific Plan.
Terra Vista Community Plan (TCVP) 1983
adopted/1995 last revised
Repeal – The Plan Area along Foothill Boulevard will be regulated by the new form-
based zoning district based on the General Plan Update.
The remaining area is a combination of Low Medium, Medium, Medium High, and
High zoning districts. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining areas
consistent with the standards in the TCVP.
Town Square Master Plan (TS) 2002 Repeal – This area to be regulated by policy and standards in the General Plan Areas
regulated by the General Plan will be implemented with the citywide code (including
new form-based districts, and design standards, as applicable).
Victoria Arbors Master Plan (VA) 2002 See VCP below. Victoria Arbors Master Plan overlaps with the VCP.
Victoria Community Plan (VCP) 1981 Repeal – A portion will be regulated by the applicable new form-based zoning district
based on General Plan placetype. For the remainder, the existing Low and Low
Medium Residential zoning districts will be applied based on the designation in the
VCP. The Mixed Use overlay will also be deleted as part of this effort.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 7
The Interim Development Code update includes modifications to existing zoning districts as well as new zoning
districts with form-based code components. Table 2, General Plan Modifying Existing Zoning Districts, displays the
following recommended zoning districts to implement each of the General Plan land use designations and if
modifications or new zoning districts are needed (Interim Development Code Update, 5). Recommendations
to implement the General Plan and create new zones to implement the new mixed-use land use designations
are provided in Section 2.B of the Interim Development code update (Interim Development Code update, 5).
Other changes to existing zoning districts may be recommended based on an assessment of General Plan
policies in Appendix A of the Interim Development Code update. Appendix A is used to identify
inconsistencies between the General Plan and the City’s Development Code and provide recommendations to
resolve those inconsistencies (Interim Development Code Update, A-1).
The Interim Development Code will facilitate development in zoned properties and bring them into compliance
with the General Plan. While zoning districts will change, the development potential and impacts are already
addressed in the General Plan EIR. In most cases, there are development standards for any new permitted use
that would not be subject to CEQA review. However, development policies, programs, ordinances, and permits
that define the development process would still apply.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 8 March 2022
Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning
General Plan Land
Use Designation
Implementing Zone Recommendation
Neighborhood Place Type
Semi-Rural
Neighborhood
Very Low Residential (VL) Modify to allow multi-family, civic and
neighborhood serving commercial consistent with
General Plan
Traditional
Neighborhood
TBD Discuss with City the possibility of modification of
EHNCP Zones to apply Requires additional
microscale analysis in residential areas
Suburban
Neighborhood –
Very Low
Low (L) and/or Low Medium
Residential (LM)
Modify maximum allowed density consistent with
General Plan consistent with General Plan
Suburban
Neighborhood-
Moderate
High Residential (H) Modify to ensure limited neighborhood commercial
uses allowed consistent with General Plan
Urban
Neighborhood
FBC: Urban Center New Zone consistent with General Plan
Corridor Place Type
Neighborhood
Corridor
FBC: Neighborhood General New Zone consistent with General Plan
City Corridor -
Moderate
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan
City Corridor – High FBC: Urban Corridor New Zone consistent with General Plan
District Place Type
21st Century
Employment
District
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan
Office Employment
District
Office Professional (OP) and
or Commercial Office (CO)
combination
Modify to allow mixed use, multi-family, increase
height/density, and reduce setbacks consistent with
General Plan
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 9
1.5 GENERAL PLAN EIR
The General Plan EIR found that, with the implementation of policies and actions from the General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR,
there would be less than significant impacts related to aesthetics, energy, geology and soils, hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land
use/planning, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and services, and wildfire. As the
proposed project is intended to align the Development Code and Zoning map with the General Plan, implementation of policies and actions from the
General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR would have the same mitigating effect under the Interim Development Code and impacts
would also be less than significant.
Table 3 lists the significant and unavoidable impact determinations of the General Plan EIR and compares the resulting impacts of the proposed project
to those determinations. The General Plan EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts
to agriculture/forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation. As described
below, the proposed project would be within the scope of analysis of the General Plan update identified in the EIR. The proposed project would
incorporate all applicable General Plan policies and implementation measures for significant and unavoidable impacts identified in Table 3 and would not
create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.
Table 3: General Plan EIR Significant and Unavoidable Impacts and Impacts of the Proposed Project
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Agriculture and Forest Resources Impact 5.2-1: The proposed project would convert Farmland to non-
agricultural uses but would not result in the conversion of forest land to non-forest uses. [Thresholds AG-1 and AG-5]
The proposed project would not allow development of land that was not considered for development under
the General Plan. While current vineyards and orchards would be converted into urban uses as part of future anticipated development, they would not impact land not considered for development in the General
Plan EIR. There proposed project would not have an effect in forest lands because there are no lands
that qualify as forest or timberland.
Air Quality Impact 5.3-2: The proposed project would cause construction-generated
criteria air pollutant or precursor emissions to exceed South Coast
AQMD-recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ-2]
Impact 5.3-3: The proposed project would result in a net increase in long-
term operational criteria air pollutant and precursor emissions that
exceed South Coast AQMD-recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ-
2]
Impact 5.3-5: The proposed project would expose sensitive receptors to
substantial increases in toxic air contaminant emissions. [Threshold AQ-
3]
The General Plan Update would accommodate future development of single-family and low-rise
multifamily residential, retail, hotel, office, art/entertainment/recreation, and industrial land uses. The
proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and
impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that
analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The future development and other physical changes that could result from implementation of the Interim
Development Code would generate construction-related emissions of criteria air pollutants and
precursors. The proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General
Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the
same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in exposure of sensitive receptors due
to construction-related TAC. However, the proposed project would not change the type of development
assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim
Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 10 March 2022
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Biological Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout of the proposed Land Use Plan would impact
sensitive plant and animal species known to occur in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. [Threshold B-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could impact special status vegetation or special status
wildlife in the city. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim
Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Cultural Resources Impact 5.5-1: Buildout of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
could impact historic resources. [Thresholds C-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could adversely impact some of these historic
resources. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed
in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code
would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.8-4: The proposed project would be inconsistent with the
State’s ability to achieve the long-term reduction goals or Executive
Orders S-3-05, B-30-15, and B-55-18. [Threshold GHG-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in the generation of greenhouse gases.
However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the
General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would
be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Noise Impact 5.13-1: Construction activities would result in temporary noise
increases in the vicinity of the future development under the General
Plan. [Threshold N-1]
Impact 5.13-2: Project implementation could generate a substantial
permanent increase in traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses in
excess local standards. [Threshold N-2]
Impact 5.13-4: Expose new sensitive land uses to noise levels in excess
of the noise compatibility standards identified in 2040 General Plan
Noise Element Table N-1. [Threshold N-4]
Impact 5.13-5: Future development under the General Plan could
generate short-term construction vibration or exposure to new sensitive
land uses to long-term operational vibration sources that exceed City
thresholds. [Threshold N-5]
The City has established standards for acceptable noise levels in Section 17.66.050 that are consistent
with the Development Code update. Because the proposed project would not change the type or location
of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with implementation of
the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Traffic noise modeling was conducted for existing (2021) and future (2040) conditions using traffic data
generated for the 2040 General Plan, which was based on anticipated land use development
contemplated under buildout conditions through 2040. Because the proposed project would not change
the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with
implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General
Plan EIR.
New development associated with the 2040 General Plan could potentially be near existing roadways
and existing or future planned railroads. Because the proposed project would not change the type or
location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with
implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General
Plan EIR.
Implementation of standard conditions of approval 5.13-5b and 5.13-5c, which require project-specific
vibration analyses to evaluate vibration exposure from nearby transit sources and evaluation of potential
vibration impacts from new transit projects would still be required under the Interim Development Code.
Therefore, noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the
same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 11
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Transportation Impact 5.17-2: The project may be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b) regarding policies to reduce VMT. [Threshold B-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in changes to the vehicle miles traveled by
residential and non-residential development in the City. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and VMT-related impacts
associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in
the General Plan EIR..
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
2. CEQA Analysis
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas, open space,
mobility and access, housing, public facilities and services, resource conservation, safety, and noise. As
previously described in Section 1.4 and referenced in Table 3, the General Plan EIR addresses potentially
significant impacts related to agriculture and forestry, air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas
emissions, noise, and transportation. The policies of the General Plan and the existing development
standards apply to all development in the General Plan and would continue to apply to the land that is the
subject of the proposed project.
The proposed zoning changes are intended to align the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning Map with the
land use designations and policies and implementation measures with the General Plan and will replace or
amend specific plans and master plans previously adopted. Therefore, these changes would not result in
significant changes to the existing land uses and or development standards as compared to that analysis in
the General Plan EIR. The modification to the specific and master plans in the General Plan EIR is
consistent with the specific design standards and guidelines in the Development Code update
(Development Code Update, Appendix-H).
The General Plan EIR anticipates growth in focused areas of the community that are already designated
for development (Project Description, 3-2). The Land Use & Community Character in Section 5.11 Land
Use and Planning details policy changes for different place types. These focus areas will increase housing and
building intensity as well as create more urban spaces (Land Use and Planning, 5-11-7). The General Plan
EIR suggests Volume 4 Implementation Strategy recommends policy change in the development code
changes. (Project Description, 3-3)
Chapter 3, Project Description of the General Plan EIR, considers anticipated growth for existing and
proposed General Plan Designation as listed in Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning. The Land Use
Designations listed in Table 3 -2 Existing and Proposed Land Use Designations of the General Plan EIR display
density ranges for mix of existing land use designations that will comprise the new place type; these density
ranges are consistent with the recommendations listed in proposed Interim Development Code update
(Project Description, 3-6).
2.2 FINDINGS
The discussion in this addendum confirms that the proposed project has been evaluated for significant
impacts pursuant to CEQA.
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or new information that was not known and could
not have been known at the time of the certification of the General Plan EIR. As a result, and for the
reasons explained in this addendum, the project would not cause any new significant environmental impacts
or substantially increase the severity of significant environmental impacts disclosed in the General Plan
EIR. Thus, the proposed project does not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 13 March 2022
requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum. Accordingly, this EIR addendum has been prepared.
The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the project.
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase
in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The proposed project will align the new zoning districts as shown in the Interim Development Code
update with the land use designations including the addition of form-based code components and
mixed -use place type descriptions assumed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed changes are
consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the updates to the
Development code would not change the conclusions of the EIR and would not require revisions to
the General Plan EIR due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects.
2. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR.
The policies and implementation measures identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply
to all development in the city and would have the same effect to reduce or eliminate environmental
impacts as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The amendments to the Development Code were
discussed in the General Plan EIR, and there is nothing in the proposed project that was not known
and could not have been known at the time the General Plan EIR was certified demonstrating that the
project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR. Therefore, no new impacts
would occur because of future development. Because a development project must be consistent with
the General Plan, zoning, and development standards of the City, the resulting impacts would be the
same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR.
Implementation of the proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed
in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and implementation measures identified in the
General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new development. These
policies would have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in
the General Plan EIR. There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant effects
examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General Plan EIR.
4. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative.
The proposed project will align the zoning districts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the General
Plan Land Use Map as evaluated by the General Plan EIR. All policies and implementation measures
identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the city and would
have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in the General Plan
EIR. The proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and,
therefore, would not substantially change the conclusions of the EIR or require new mitigation
measures.
5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project changes would not result in an increase of overall development intensity and the
resulting impacts would be the same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR. Therefore,
no new mitigation measures or alternatives to the proposed project would be required.