HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022/05/18 - Regular MeetingMayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
AMENDED AGENDA
(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
May 18, 2022
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC
FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00
p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of
meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. Live
Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).
NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,
2022, City Council meeting.
In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact
that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in this
City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend the
meeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of
the meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the
Public Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls
will be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the
safety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your
government/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of Rancho
Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the
COVID19 virus.
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.
TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison and Scott
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) AND
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)
D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)
D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)
D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)
D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;
CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.
TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF
PAYMENT. – (CITY)
D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE
NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK
STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 AND
CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITY
NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING
DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:
PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, City
Council meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison and Scott
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022
Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of
April in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,
Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Transtech
Engineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Aufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional Plan
Check Services. (CITY)
D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Securities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6th
Street at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.
(CITY)
D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs
020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.
CO93050. (CITY)
D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code
Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,
Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,
and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified Final
Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). (CITY)
D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project Needs
Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)
G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading of
Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, to
Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised
Zoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square Master
Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary and
Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION
2022055) (CITY)
G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the Northwest
Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.
The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor
(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: Design
Review DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)
Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)
G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed
Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special
Taxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.
2020060). (CITY)
H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating a
Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)
H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 Holiday
Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 1
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. Scott AMENDED AGENDA(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAMay 18, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,2022, City Council meeting.In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contactthat could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in thisCity Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend themeeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start ofthe meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when thePublic Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Callswill be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from thesafety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/yourgovernment/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of RanchoCucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison and ScottA. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) AND
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)
D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)
D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)
D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)
D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;
CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.
TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF
PAYMENT. – (CITY)
D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE
NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)
D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK
STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 AND
CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITY
NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING
DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:
PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, City
Council meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison and Scott
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022
Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of
April in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,
Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Transtech
Engineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Aufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional Plan
Check Services. (CITY)
D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Securities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6th
Street at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.
(CITY)
D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs
020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.
CO93050. (CITY)
D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code
Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,
Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,
and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified Final
Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). (CITY)
D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project Needs
Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)
G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading of
Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, to
Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised
Zoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square Master
Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary and
Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION
2022055) (CITY)
G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the Northwest
Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.
The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor
(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: Design
Review DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)
Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)
G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed
Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special
Taxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.
2020060). (CITY)
H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating a
Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)
H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 Holiday
Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 2
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. Scott AMENDED AGENDA(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAMay 18, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,2022, City Council meeting.In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contactthat could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in thisCity Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend themeeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start ofthe meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when thePublic Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Callswill be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from thesafety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/yourgovernment/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of RanchoCucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison and ScottA. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) ANDTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OFPAYMENT. – (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 ANDCERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITYNEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTINGDESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, City
Council meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison and Scott
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022
Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of
April in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,
Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Transtech
Engineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Aufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional Plan
Check Services. (CITY)
D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Securities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6th
Street at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.
(CITY)
D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs
020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.
CO93050. (CITY)
D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code
Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,
Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,
and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified Final
Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). (CITY)
D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project Needs
Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)
G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading of
Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, to
Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised
Zoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square Master
Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary and
Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION
2022055) (CITY)
G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the Northwest
Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.
The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor
(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: Design
Review DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)
Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)
G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed
Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special
Taxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.
2020060). (CITY)
H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating a
Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)
H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 Holiday
Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 3
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. Scott AMENDED AGENDA(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAMay 18, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,2022, City Council meeting.In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contactthat could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in thisCity Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend themeeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start ofthe meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when thePublic Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Callswill be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from thesafety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/yourgovernment/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of RanchoCucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison and ScottA. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) ANDTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OFPAYMENT. – (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 ANDCERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITYNEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTINGDESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSNOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, CityCouncil meeting.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison and ScottA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022
Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of
April in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,
Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Transtech
Engineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Aufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional Plan
Check Services. (CITY)
D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Securities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita
Avenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6th
Street at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.
(CITY)
D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs
020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.
CO93050. (CITY)
D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code
Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,
Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,
and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified Final
Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). (CITY)
D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project Needs
Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)
G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading of
Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, to
Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised
Zoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square Master
Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary and
Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION
2022055) (CITY)
G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the Northwest
Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.
The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor
(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: Design
Review DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)
Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)
G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed
Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special
Taxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.
2020060). (CITY)
H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating a
Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)
H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 Holiday
Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 4
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. Scott AMENDED AGENDA(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAMay 18, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,2022, City Council meeting.In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contactthat could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in thisCity Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend themeeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start ofthe meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when thePublic Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Callswill be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from thesafety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/yourgovernment/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of RanchoCucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison and ScottA. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) ANDTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OFPAYMENT. – (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 ANDCERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITYNEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTINGDESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSNOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, CityCouncil meeting.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison and ScottA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month ofApril in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with TranstechEngineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement withAufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional PlanCheck Services. (CITY)D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and ImprovementSecurities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa AnitaAvenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6thStreet at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.(CITY)D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino CountyTransportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.CO93050. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government CodeSection 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified FinalEnvironmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA). (CITY)D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project NeedsAnalysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)
G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading of
Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, to
Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised
Zoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square Master
Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary and
Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION
2022055) (CITY)
G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the Northwest
Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.
The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor
(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: Design
Review DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)
Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)
G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed
Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of Special
Taxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.
2020060). (CITY)
H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating a
Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.
(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)
H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 Holiday
Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 5
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. Scott AMENDED AGENDA(REVISED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OPTION 5/16/2022 12:40PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAMay 18, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV3).NOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1,2022, City Council meeting.In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contactthat could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in thisCity Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend themeeting in person. Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start ofthe meeting by dialing (909)7742751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when thePublic Hearing is being heard at (909)7742751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Callswill be answered in the order received. Members of the public are encouraged to watch from thesafety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/yourgovernment/city council agendas or Local Cable: RC TV3 Programming. The City of RanchoCucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison and ScottA. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) ANDTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201969. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201968. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2201966. (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 8920 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JULIAN F.TORKAN, MADISON CAPITAL GROUP, INC.; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OFPAYMENT. – (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINKSTATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 ANDCERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITYNEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTINGDESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSNOTE: Discussion of options for the City Council District 1 vacancy is scheduled for the June 1, 2022, CityCouncil meeting.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison and ScottA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation in Honor of Professional Municipal Clerk’s Week.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month ofApril in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022,Through May 10, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with TranstechEngineers (CO#19106) and Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement withAufbau Corporation (CO#19107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional PlanCheck Services. (CITY)D4.Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement, and ImprovementSecurities for Street Improvements Located Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa AnitaAvenue and 2,300 Feet West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6thStreet at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and DRC202000202.(CITY)D5.Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the Cucamonga Station (APNs020927211 and 020927222) into Joint Tenancy with the San Bernardino CountyTransportation Authority in Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No.CO93050. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government CodeSection 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998,Adopting an Interim Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a Certified FinalEnvironmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA). (CITY)D7.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" FiveYear Capital Project NeedsAnalysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022054) (CITY)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTIONF. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens forDelinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022051) (CITY)G2.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022055 and Conduct of First Reading ofOrdinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, toAdopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A RevisedZoning Map, Repeal the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda NorthSpecific Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square MasterPlan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Boundary andRename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the General Plan ProgramEnvironmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO. 1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION2022055) (CITY)G3.Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC202200074 at the NorthwestCorner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant.The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a MixedUse Development Comprising Of 671Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the MixedUse Urban Corridor(MUUCR) District, APNs: 107742251, 55, 98, 99, 109012138, and 39. (Related Files: DesignReview DRC202100120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c)Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022049) (CITY)G4.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making Determinations Regarding the ProposedAnnexation of Territory (Annexation No. 221) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an ExistingCommunity Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing Submittal of Levy of SpecialTaxes to the Qualified Electors. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022010) (FIRE)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)H1.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No.2020060). (CITY)H2.Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and Allocating aPortion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho CucamongaEnhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions Related Thereto.(RESOLUTION NOS. 2022050 AND FD2022011) (CITY/FIRE)H3.Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2022 HolidayLights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred andJennet Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise
Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022
Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022053) (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further
Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to
Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
I2.Consideration of Resolution No. 2022052, Amending Resolution 2022021 to Adjust Certain City
Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022052) (CITY)
I3.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I4.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 6
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the
Total Amount of $1,715,453.39 and City and Fire District Weekly Check
Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas
Company) in the Total Amount of $2,119,369.51 Dated April 25, 2022
Through May 10, 2022 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit
Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $7,290,716.65.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,025,030.91 and $690,422.48 for the City and
the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $1,948,548.83 and
$170,820.68 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Electronic Debit Register amounts are
$6,927,191.39 and $363,525.26 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Attachment 2 - Electronic Debit Register
Page 7
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00014196 04/27/2022 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 121.37 121.37
AP 00014197 04/27/2022 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 123,750.00 0.00 123,750.00
AP 00014198 04/27/2022 HAMPTON YOGA 348.00 0.00 348.00
AP 00014199 04/27/2022 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 16,577.50 16,577.50
***AP 00014200 04/27/2022 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 112,426.14 1,616.20 114,042.34
AP 00014201 04/28/2022 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 59.17 0.00 59.17
AP 00014202 04/28/2022 BRODART CO 12,310.25 0.00 12,310.25
AP 00014203 04/28/2022 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 608.82 0.00 608.82
***AP 00014204 04/28/2022 EMCOR SERVICES 1,718.50 953.00 2,671.50
AP 00014205 04/28/2022 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS INC 1,129.46 0.00 1,129.46
AP 00014206 04/28/2022 GALLS LLC 0.00 549.42 549.42
AP 00014207 04/28/2022 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 7,331.91 0.00 7,331.91
***AP 00014208 04/28/2022 HOSE-MAN INC 182.54 165.47 348.01
AP 00014209 04/28/2022 MINUTEMAN PRESS 2,248.80 0.00 2,248.80
***AP 00014210 04/28/2022 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 1,579.96 85.83 1,665.79
AP 00014211 04/28/2022 PSA PRINT GROUP 1,454.09 0.00 1,454.09
AP 00014212 04/28/2022 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 23.25 0.00 23.25
AP 00014213 05/04/2022 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 0.00 1,286.74 1,286.74
AP 00014214 05/04/2022 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 110,526.85 0.00 110,526.85
AP 00014215 05/04/2022 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,088.80 0.00 1,088.80
AP 00014216 05/04/2022 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 40,760.25 0.00 40,760.25
AP 00014217 05/04/2022 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 1,520.00 0.00 1,520.00
***AP 00014218 05/04/2022 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 11,005.59 2,068.23 13,073.82
AP 00014219 05/04/2022 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 14,688.48 0.00 14,688.48
AP 00014220 05/04/2022 OPENTEXT INC 763.84 0.00 763.84
AP 00014221 05/04/2022 RCCEA 1,438.75 0.00 1,438.75
AP 00014222 05/04/2022 RCPFA 12,651.83 0.00 12,651.83
AP 00014223 05/04/2022 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 295.10 0.00 295.10
AP 00014224 05/04/2022 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 485.66 0.00 485.66
AP 00014225 05/04/2022 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 433,768.74 0.00 433,768.74
AP 00014226 05/04/2022 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,857.38 0.00 10,857.38
AP 00014227 05/05/2022 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 434.78 0.00 434.78
AP 00014228 05/05/2022 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 425.95 425.95
AP 00014229 05/05/2022 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,356.75 0.00 3,356.75
AP 00014230 05/05/2022 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 302.96 0.00 302.96
AP 00014231 05/05/2022 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,751.07 0.00 1,751.07
AP 00014232 05/05/2022 EMCOR SERVICES 0.00 973.75 973.75
AP 00014233 05/05/2022 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS INC 1,993.18 0.00 1,993.18
AP 00014234 05/05/2022 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,311.91 0.00 3,311.91
***AP 00014235 05/05/2022 HOSE-MAN INC 311.11 100.95 412.06
AP 00014236 05/05/2022 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 415.88 415.88
AP 00014237 05/05/2022 MINUTEMAN PRESS 203.93 0.00 203.93
AP 00014238 05/05/2022 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 3,426.92 0.00 3,426.92
AP 00014239 05/05/2022 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 0.00 38.79
AP 00424192 04/27/2022 ALL WELDING 350.00 0.00 350.00
AP 00424193 04/27/2022 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 5,591.06 5,591.06
AP 00424194 04/27/2022 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 297.59 0.00 297.59
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 8
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424195 04/27/2022 ALVAREZ, MARIA ELENA 162.00 0.00 162.00
AP 00424196 04/27/2022 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,910.00 0.00 1,910.00
AP 00424197 04/27/2022 AROCHO, ALMA 491.40 0.00 491.40
AP 00424198 04/27/2022 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 34,188.46 0.00 34,188.46
AP 00424199 04/27/2022 ASSI SECURITY 0.00 4,100.00 4,100.00
AP 00424200 04/27/2022 AUFBAU CORPORATION 7,476.65 0.00 7,476.65
AP 00424201 04/27/2022 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 552.00 0.00 552.00
AP 00424202 04/27/2022 BAST, KAROLYN 294.00 0.00 294.00
AP 00424203 04/27/2022 BEST OUTDOOR POWER INLAND LLC 375.87 0.00 375.87
AP 00424204 04/27/2022 BTB CONSTRUCTION INC 1,001.74 0.00 1,001.74
AP 00424205 04/27/2022 BURNS, BRYAN 0.00 320.00 320.00
***AP 00424212 04/27/2022 C V W D 97,678.44 1,406.41 99,084.85
AP 00424213 04/27/2022 CA LLC - ALTA LAGUNA MHP 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00424214 04/27/2022 CAL FIRE / OSFM / FIRE ENGINEERING 0.00 600.00 600.00
AP 00424215 04/27/2022 CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION 1,425.00 0.00 1,425.00
AP 00424216 04/27/2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 1,064.70 0.00 1,064.70
AP 00424217 04/27/2022 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 6,210.00 0.00 6,210.00
AP 00424218 04/27/2022 CALIX INC 907.62 0.00 907.62
AP 00424219 04/27/2022 CAMERON WELDING 113.85 0.00 113.85
AP 00424220 04/27/2022 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP 6,612.11 0.00 6,612.11
AP 00424221 04/27/2022 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 600.00 0.00 600.00
AP 00424222 04/27/2022 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 2,054.94 2,054.94
AP 00424223 04/27/2022 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00
AP 00424224 04/27/2022 CHINO MOWER & EQUIPMENT 4,595.10 0.00 4,595.10
***AP 00424225 04/27/2022 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,813.78 251.86 3,065.64
AP 00424226 04/27/2022 CLARK, KAREN 384.00 0.00 384.00
AP 00424227 04/27/2022 CODING MINDS INC 90.00 0.00 90.00
AP 00424228 04/27/2022 CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC 1,407.50 0.00 1,407.50
AP 00424229 04/27/2022 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 2,181.96 0.00 2,181.96
AP 00424230 04/27/2022 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 74.79 0.00 74.79
AP 00424231 04/27/2022 CROW, AMY 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00424232 04/27/2022 CUMMINS SALES & SERVICE 0.00 315.36 315.36
AP 00424233 04/27/2022 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,169.37 0.00 2,169.37
AP 00424234 04/27/2022 DELL MARKETING LP 11,322.90 0.00 11,322.90
AP 00424235 04/27/2022 DIAMOND W EXCAVATING INC 322.50 0.00 322.50
AP 00424236 04/27/2022 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,477.30 0.00 1,477.30
AP 00424237 04/27/2022 EAGLE ROAD SERVICE & TIRE 1,140.08 0.00 1,140.08
AP 00424238 04/27/2022 ECONO FENCE COMPANY INC 0.00 1,330.00 1,330.00
AP 00424239 04/27/2022 ELANCO US INC 178.89 0.00 178.89
AP 00424240 04/27/2022 ELITE COMMAND TRAINING LLC 0.00 3,675.00 3,675.00
AP 00424241 04/27/2022 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 0.00 37.00 37.00
AP 00424242 04/27/2022 ERICKSON, RONALD 6,900.00 0.00 6,900.00
AP 00424243 04/27/2022 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 360.00 360.00
AP 00424244 04/27/2022 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 437.42 0.00 437.42
AP 00424245 04/27/2022 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 2,721.87 2,721.87
AP 00424246 04/27/2022 FASTENAL COMPANY 5.98 0.00 5.98
AP 00424247 04/27/2022 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.00 129.85 129.85
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 9
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424248 04/27/2022 FIALLOS, WILSON 2,841.00 0.00 2,841.00
AP 00424249 04/27/2022 FORTIN LAW GROUP 2,056.50 0.00 2,056.50
AP 00424250 04/27/2022 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS INC 0.00 40.84 40.84
***AP 00424251 04/27/2022 FRONTIER COMM 1,743.19 310.71 2,053.90
AP 00424252 04/27/2022 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY & CREMATORY 695.00 0.00 695.00
AP 00424253 04/27/2022 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00
***AP 00424254 04/27/2022 GRAINGER 1,511.47 787.75 2,299.22
AP 00424255 04/27/2022 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 173.00 0.00 173.00
AP 00424256 04/27/2022 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00424257 04/27/2022 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 681.60 0.00 681.60
AP 00424258 04/27/2022 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 405.00 0.00 405.00
AP 00424259 04/27/2022 HI-WAY SAFETY INC 150.00 0.00 150.00
AP 00424260 04/27/2022 HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES INC 2,094.02 0.00 2,094.02
AP 00424261 04/27/2022 HODNICK, CHRISTOPHER 21.00 0.00 21.00
AP 00424262 04/27/2022 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00424263 04/27/2022 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 773.00 0.00 773.00
AP 00424264 04/27/2022 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 189.00 0.00 189.00
AP 00424265 04/27/2022 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 2,815.96 0.00 2,815.96
AP 00424266 04/27/2022 IMPETT VETERINARY INC 2,340.00 0.00 2,340.00
AP 00424267 04/27/2022 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 65.80 0.00 65.80
AP 00424268 04/27/2022 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 734.50 0.00 734.50
AP 00424269 04/27/2022 INLAND SOCAL MEDIA GROUP LLC 1,995.00 0.00 1,995.00
AP 00424270 04/27/2022 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 501.60 0.00 501.60
AP 00424271 04/27/2022 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50
AP 00424272 04/27/2022 IPERMIT 284.58 0.00 284.58
AP 00424273 04/27/2022 J & ME CAKE 102.00 0.00 102.00
AP 00424274 04/27/2022 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC 1,417.99 0.00 1,417.99
AP 00424275 04/27/2022 JIANG, ZHONG 79.41 0.00 79.41
AP 00424276 04/27/2022 KEITH, JORRY 630.00 0.00 630.00
AP 00424277 04/27/2022 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT CO INC 622.61 0.00 622.61
AP 00424278 04/27/2022 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 4,494.64 0.00 4,494.64
AP 00424279 04/27/2022 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 650.00 0.00 650.00
AP 00424280 04/27/2022 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 817.40 817.40
AP 00424281 04/27/2022 MALLORY SAFETY & SUPPLY LLC 204.63 0.00 204.63
AP 00424282 04/27/2022 MARY MCGRATH ARCHITECTS 0.00 5,122.50 5,122.50
***AP 00424283 04/27/2022 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 164.19 678.74 842.93
AP 00424284 04/27/2022 MIDWEST TAPE 304.08 0.00 304.08
AP 00424285 04/27/2022 MONTGOMERY, DILLON 41.30 0.00 41.30
AP 00424286 04/27/2022 MUSIC STAR 49.00 0.00 49.00
AP 00424287 04/27/2022 NAKAMURA, JENNIFER 395.87 0.00 395.87
***AP 00424288 04/27/2022 NAPA AUTO PARTS 64.26 457.52 521.78
AP 00424289 04/27/2022 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 1,560.00 0.00 1,560.00
AP 00424290 04/27/2022 NBS 5,700.00 0.00 5,700.00
AP 00424291 04/27/2022 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA 0.00 1,204.09 1,204.09
AP 00424292 04/27/2022 ONLY CREMATIONS FOR PETS INC 665.00 0.00 665.00
AP 00424293 04/27/2022 OTT, SHARON 525.00 0.00 525.00
AP 00424294 04/27/2022 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 175.00 0.00 175.00
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 10
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424295 04/27/2022 PARR LUMBER COMPANY 0.00 2,539.01 2,539.01
AP 00424296 04/27/2022 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00424297 04/27/2022 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 4,091.24 0.00 4,091.24
AP 00424298 04/27/2022 PRIVATE BRAND MFG 1,229.70 0.00 1,229.70
AP 00424299 04/27/2022 PROS CONSULTING INC 10,660.00 0.00 10,660.00
AP 00424300 04/27/2022 R3 CONSULTING GROUP INC 736.25 0.00 736.25
AP 00424301 04/27/2022 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TOWN SQUARE 30,362.36 0.00 30,362.36
AP 00424302 04/27/2022 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 44.95 0.00 44.95
AP 00424303 04/27/2022 RANCHO WEST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00424304 04/27/2022 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 102.15 0.00 102.15
AP 00424305 04/27/2022 RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE SOLUTION LLC 41,116.00 0.00 41,116.00
AP 00424306 04/27/2022 RIEPELE, PAMELA 248.93 0.00 248.93
AP 00424307 04/27/2022 SALTIKOV, BRIAN 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00
AP 00424308 04/27/2022 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 0.00 10.00 10.00
AP 00424309 04/27/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT 63,926.72 0.00 63,926.72
AP 00424310 04/27/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,243.35 0.00 1,243.35
AP 00424311 04/27/2022 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 0.00 16,375.00 16,375.00
AP 00424312 04/27/2022 SEBASTIANS PET GROOMING LLC 461.72 0.00 461.72
AP 00424313 04/27/2022 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 183.18 183.18
AP 00424314 04/27/2022 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 0.00 5,365.50 5,365.50
***AP 00424318 04/27/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,448.14 1,347.74 20,795.88
AP 00424319 04/27/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,697.69 0.00 2,697.69
AP 00424320 04/27/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE INC 70,042.92 0.00 70,042.92
AP 00424321 04/27/2022 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 2,031.37 0.00 2,031.37
***AP 00424322 04/27/2022 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 180.00 140.00 320.00
AP 00424323 04/27/2022 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,238.57 0.00 1,238.57
AP 00424324 04/27/2022 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,178.17 0.00 1,178.17
AP 00424325 04/27/2022 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00
AP 00424326 04/27/2022 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 478.04 478.04
AP 00424327 04/27/2022 TOXGUARD FLUID TECHNOLOGIES INC 635.51 0.00 635.51
AP 00424328 04/27/2022 TRAILS UNLIMITED LLC 0.00 3,410.00 3,410.00
AP 00424329 04/27/2022 TYUS, IDA 693.60 0.00 693.60
AP 00424330 04/27/2022 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 12,227.07 0.00 12,227.07
AP 00424331 04/27/2022 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,014.89 0.00 1,014.89
AP 00424332 04/27/2022 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00
AP 00424333 04/27/2022 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 147.52 0.00 147.52
AP 00424334 04/27/2022 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 836.36 0.00 836.36
AP 00424335 04/27/2022 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00
***AP 00424336 04/27/2022 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 3,638.89 131.82 3,770.71
***AP 00424337 04/27/2022 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,516.26 21.73 1,537.99
AP 00424338 04/27/2022 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 38,322.00 0.00 38,322.00
AP 00424339 04/27/2022 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 6,516.10 0.00 6,516.10
AP 00424340 04/27/2022 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 160.99 0.00 160.99
AP 00424341 04/27/2022 WILLIAMS, ISAIAH 85.22 0.00 85.22
AP 00424342 04/27/2022 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 328.70 0.00 328.70
AP 00424343 04/27/2022 WINFUND MANAGEMENT 624.00 0.00 624.00
AP 00424344 04/27/2022 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 11
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424345 04/27/2022 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 22,744.00 22,744.00
AP 00424346 04/27/2022 YUNEX LLC 8,533.00 0.00 8,533.00
AP 00424347 04/27/2022 ZHOU, SIJIA 64.74 0.00 64.74
AP 00424348 05/04/2022 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
AP 00424349 05/04/2022 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 1,326.62 1,326.62
AP 00424350 05/04/2022 AMAZON WEB SERVICES INC 2,767.24 0.00 2,767.24
AP 00424351 05/04/2022 AMS PLANNING & RESEARCH CORP 8,900.00 0.00 8,900.00
AP 00424352 05/04/2022 ARCHIBALD FLOWERS 850.00 0.00 850.00
AP 00424353 05/04/2022 BILL & WAGS INC 3,013.25 0.00 3,013.25
AP 00424354 05/04/2022 BOUCHER LAW PC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
***AP 00424355 05/04/2022 C V W D 425.84 102.25 528.09
***AP 00424360 05/04/2022 C V W D 64,552.53 74.57 64,627.10
AP 00424361 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY 300.95 0.00 300.95
AP 00424362 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00424363 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 432.87 0.00 432.87
AP 00424364 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 55.00 0.00 55.00
AP 00424365 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 589.14 0.00 589.14
AP 00424366 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00424367 05/04/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00424368 05/04/2022 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 177.08 0.00 177.08
AP 00424369 05/04/2022 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 2,271.00 0.00 2,271.00
***AP 00424370 05/04/2022 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,492.74 6,458.42 10,951.16
AP 00424371 05/04/2022 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 360.42 360.42
AP 00424372 05/04/2022 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 270.00 0.00 270.00
AP 00424373 05/04/2022 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 60.00 0.00 60.00
AP 00424374 05/04/2022 DIRECTV 93.99 0.00 93.99
***AP 00424375 05/04/2022 DP SOLUTIONS INC 8,370.00 8,370.00 16,740.00
AP 00424376 05/04/2022 ECS IMAGING INC 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00
AP 00424377 05/04/2022 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 300.00 300.00
AP 00424378 05/04/2022 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 45.20 0.00 45.20
AP 00424379 05/04/2022 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 170.72 0.00 170.72
AP 00424380 05/04/2022 FLAG SYSTEMS INC 4,998.94 0.00 4,998.94
AP 00424381 05/04/2022 FRONTIER COMM 4,001.81 0.00 4,001.81
AP 00424382 05/04/2022 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,054.60 0.00 6,054.60
AP 00424383 05/04/2022 GENTRY BROTHERS INC 51,739.47 0.00 51,739.47
AP 00424384 05/04/2022 GILLISON, JOHN 21.00 0.00 21.00
AP 00424385 05/04/2022 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 1,535.78 0.00 1,535.78
AP 00424386 05/04/2022 HANSEN, SUSIE 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00
AP 00424387 05/04/2022 HDL COREN & CONE 4,825.00 0.00 4,825.00
AP 00424388 05/04/2022 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00
AP 00424389 05/04/2022 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 1,164.38 0.00 1,164.38
AP 00424390 05/04/2022 IMPETT VETERINARY INC 2,640.00 0.00 2,640.00
AP 00424391 05/04/2022 INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00
AP 00424392 05/04/2022 ITRON INC 8,425.28 0.00 8,425.28
AP 00424393 05/04/2022 K-K WOODWORKING 107.64 0.00 107.64
AP 00424394 05/04/2022 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 1,468.00 0.00 1,468.00
AP 00424395 05/04/2022 KENNEDY, LYNNE 285.98 0.00 285.98
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 12
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424396 05/04/2022 LEE, BIK 19.94 0.00 19.94
AP 00424397 05/04/2022 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00
AP 00424398 05/04/2022 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 37,358.68 0.00 37,358.68
AP 00424399 05/04/2022 MCI 34.57 0.00 34.57
AP 00424400 05/04/2022 MCKEAN, KURT 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00424401 05/04/2022 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 57.16 57.16
AP 00424402 05/04/2022 MILLARD, ALLAN DAVIS 60.00 0.00 60.00
AP 00424403 05/04/2022 MMASC 115.00 0.00 115.00
***AP 00424404 05/04/2022 NAPA AUTO PARTS 378.17 199.46 577.63
AP 00424405 05/04/2022 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP 1,256.00 0.00 1,256.00
AP 00424406 05/04/2022 ONTARIO SPAY & NEUTER INC 650.00 0.00 650.00
AP 00424407 05/04/2022 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 5,927.50 0.00 5,927.50
AP 00424408 05/04/2022 PARKES, DR KEVIN 0.00 16,000.00 16,000.00
AP 00424409 05/04/2022 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 48,972.56 0.00 48,972.56
AP 00424410 05/04/2022 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 53.36 0.00 53.36
AP 00424411 05/04/2022 QLESS INC 8,700.00 0.00 8,700.00
AP 00424412 05/04/2022 QUADIENT INC 713.03 0.00 713.03
AP 00424413 05/04/2022 ROGINA, TREVOR 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00424414 05/04/2022 SAADI, DIYAR 52.89 0.00 52.89
AP 00424415 05/04/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 12,446.01 12,446.01
AP 00424416 05/04/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 0.00 251.00 251.00
AP 00424417 05/04/2022 SBPEA 2,343.15 0.00 2,343.15
AP 00424418 05/04/2022 SDI PRESENCE LLC 16,280.00 0.00 16,280.00
AP 00424419 05/04/2022 SEED OF FAITH MINISTRIES 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00424420 05/04/2022 SHAFFER, AARON 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
AP 00424421 05/04/2022 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 197.15 197.15
AP 00424422 05/04/2022 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 463.45 0.00 463.45
AP 00424423 05/04/2022 SHRED PROS 115.00 0.00 115.00
AP 00424424 05/04/2022 SIDEPATH INC 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00
AP 00424425 05/04/2022 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,659.95 0.00 2,659.95
AP 00424427 05/04/2022 SORIANO, LISA 500.00 0.00 500.00
***AP 00424428 05/04/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,681.89 68.17 2,750.06
AP 00424429 05/04/2022 SPECIAL SERVICES GROUP LLC 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00
AP 00424430 05/04/2022 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,249.44 0.00 3,249.44
***AP 00424431 05/04/2022 TESLA INC 39,456.00 8,456.96 47,912.96
AP 00424432 05/04/2022 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 365.00 0.00 365.00
AP 00424433 05/04/2022 TIREHUB LLC 223.31 0.00 223.31
AP 00424434 05/04/2022 TRI POINTE HOMES 36.91 0.00 36.91
AP 00424436 05/04/2022 ULINE 495.47 0.00 495.47
AP 00424437 05/04/2022 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00
AP 00424438 05/04/2022 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00
AP 00424439 05/04/2022 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 358.00 0.00 358.00
AP 00424440 05/04/2022 UPS 93.86 0.00 93.86
AP 00424441 05/04/2022 US POSTMASTER 750.00 0.00 750.00
AP 00424442 05/04/2022 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 28,270.60 0.00 28,270.60
AP 00424443 05/04/2022 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00
AP 00424444 05/04/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,753.28 5,753.28
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 13
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00424445 05/04/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,757.44 0.00 5,757.44
AP 00424446 05/04/2022 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 1,489.17 0.00 1,489.17
AP 00424447 05/04/2022 WT.COX INFORMATION SERVICES 4,914.81 0.00 4,914.81
AP 00424448 05/04/2022 ZUNIGA, CRYSTAL 416.32 0.00 416.32
AP 00424449 05/05/2022 TROYAN, LINDA A 1,403.64 0.00 1,403.64
$1,948,548.83
$2,119,369.51
$170,820.68
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:26:36
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 14
DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT
4/1 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,112.87 4,112.87
4/1 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,919.98 2,919.98
4/4 Bank Fee 108.20 - 108.20
4/4 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 19,192.62 19,192.62
4/4 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 3,377.20 3,377.20
4/4 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,603.36 2,603.36
4/5 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,250.00 2,250.00
4/5 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 8,138.16 8,138.16
4/5 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 60,824.99 60,824.99
4/5 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 103,021.90 103,021.90
4/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 104.24 104.24
4/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 97.15 97.15
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,758.74 2,758.74
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,623.80 3,623.80
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,302.94 5,302.94
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,174.10 10,174.10
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 36,219.66 36,219.66
4/6 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 99,109.43 99,109.43
4/6 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 958.08 958.08
4/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,265.57 1,265.57
4/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,534.45 3,534.45
4/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50
4/7 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 677.60 677.60
4/7 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 3,553.75 3,553.75
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 2,770,000.00 2,770,000.00
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 5,650.00 5,650.00
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 16,350.00 16,350.00
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 38,700.00 38,700.00
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 438,000.00 438,000.00
4/8 WIRE PAYMENT - State Condemnation 2,378,500.00 2,378,500.00
4/8 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 239.14 239.14
4/11 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 27,782.43 27,782.43
4/11 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 650.00 650.00
4/11 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 258.53 258.53
4/12 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 48.17 48.17
4/12 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 118.53 118.53
4/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,445.36 2,445.36
4/13 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,953.65 2,953.65
4/14 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,533.46 1,533.46
4/14 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 3,584.30 3,584.30
4/15 WIRE PAYMENT - Debt Service Paymnet 224,726.97 224,726.97
4/15 WIRE PAYMENT - Debt Service Paymnet 463,918.75 463,918.75
4/15 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 659.85 659.85
4/18 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 157,477.93 157,477.93
4/18 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 12,341.34 12,341.34
4/19 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 62,328.22 62,328.22
4/19 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 101,669.33 101,669.33
4/19 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 144.57 144.57
4/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,192.13 2,192.13
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,758.74 2,758.74
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,496.17 3,496.17
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,309.40 5,309.40
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,174.10 10,174.10
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 36,219.66 36,219.66
4/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 95,847.43 95,847.43
4/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 333.07 333.07
4/20 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 236.58 236.58
4/21 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 144.18 144.18
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
APRIL 1, 2022 TO APRIL 30, 2022
1 Page 15
DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
APRIL 1, 2022 TO APRIL 30, 2022
4/21 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,534.45 3,534.45
4/21 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50
4/21 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,292.16 1,292.16
4/22 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 539.74 539.74
4/22 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,656.88 1,656.88
4/25 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 27,945.07 27,945.07
4/25 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 230.44 230.44
4/25 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 393.32 393.32
4/26 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 661.05 661.05
4/26 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 731.08 731.08
4/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 733.77 733.77
4/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 3,313.76 3,313.76
4/28 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 208.88 208.88
4/28 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 4,207.77 4,207.77
4/29 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,082.50 1,082.50
TOTAL CITY 6,927,191.39
TOTAL FIRE 363,525.26
GRAND TOTAL 7,290,716.65
2 Page 16
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers
for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total
Amount of $20,916.51 Dated April 25, 2022, Through May 10, 2022.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $18,965.26 and $1,951.25 for the
City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 17
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
So Calif Gas Company Only.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4/25/2022 through 5/10/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
***AP 00424315 04/27/2022 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 17,425.50 1,515.18 18,940.68
***AP 00424426 05/04/2022 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,539.76 436.07 1,975.83
$18,965.26
$20,916.51
$1,951.25
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:27:32
05/11/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 18
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Transtech Engineers (CO#19-106) and Amendment No.
002 to the Professional Services Agreement with Aufbau Corporation
(CO#19-107) to Increase Annual Compensation for Professional Plan
Check Services. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve:
1.Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Transtech
Engineers (CO#19-106) to increase the annual compensation amount to a total of
$100,000; and
2.Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with Aufbau Corporation
(CO#19-107) to increase the annual compensation amount to a total of $200,000.
BACKGROUND:
The Engineering Services Department has several on-call contract services options available for
use to augment or help supplement staff capacity. On July 17, 2019, City Council approved
Professional Services Agreements with Transtech Engineers, CO#19-106 and Aufbau
Corporation CO#19-107 for on-call plan check services to be utilized as needed. The annual
not to exceed amount for each agreement was set at $50,000.
ANALYSIS:
Due to recent staffing changes and an influx of larger development projects, the Engineering
Services Department began to utilize on-call services for plan checking maps, public
improvement plans, grading plans, and water quality management plans, to ease the
workload on internal staff and help improve and reduce plan check turnaround times. In
addition, as of August 26, 2021, the City’s Surveyor retired, therefore creating a need to fill
that role with contract staff through the use of on-call contracts. On November 3, 2021, City
Council approved Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Aufbau
Corporation (CO#19-107) to add City Surveyor services.
Approval of an increase of compensation for both agreements would amend the annual not
to exceed amount from $50,000 to a total amount of $100,000 for Transtech Engineers and
$200,000 for Aufbau Corporation.
Page 19
Page 2
1
2
0
0
FISCAL IMPACT:
The annual budget amount for Contract Services in Account No.1001305-5300 has been
amended to reflect the increase in plan check needs, therefore no fiscal impact is anticipated.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision to build on our success as a world class
community by cooperatively working with consultants to ensure high-quality customer service
for all development within the city.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 20
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Mario Estrada, Associate Engineer
Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 20271, Improvement Agreement,
and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements Located
Approximately 1,000 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 Feet
West of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Fourth Street, and South of 6th Street
at 12434 4th Street, Related to Case No’s. SUBTPM20271 and
DRC2020-00202. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the Parcel Map 20271;
2. Approve the Improvement Agreement for related public improvements and authorize the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Agreement;
3. Approve the plans and specifications for the related public improvements on file with the
City Engineer; and
4. Accept security in the form of bonds for completion of the related public improvements.
BACKGROUND:
On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2020-00202 for the
development of two new industrial buildings totaling 2,175,000 square feet on certain property
located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda
Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street at 12434 4th Street.
Case No. DRC2020-0020 was approved with a condition that certain public improvements be
constructed including curb and gutter, driveway approaches, streetlights, street trees, street
improvements, traffic signals modifications, at-grade crossing improvements, and storm drain
improvements.
On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTPM20271 with a
condition that Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) be provided for reciprocal access
easements where necessary and for utilities that serve both parcels including water, sewer, and
storm drainage.
Page 21
Page 2
1
2
7
2
ANALYSIS:
The developer, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC has submitted an Improvement
Agreement and securities to guarantee construction of the off-site public improvements in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond #0736314 $2,592,100
Labor and Material Bond #0736314 $2,592,100
Additionally, the developer submitted the Parcel Map for consideration of approval, and Staff has
determined that the Parcel Map is in substantial conformity with the approved Tentative Parcel
Map and conditions.
Approval of this item by the Council would approve the Improvement Agreement, accept the
securities for the construction of certain public improvements, approve Parcel Map 20271, and
allows its recordation and recordation of the CC&Rs. Copies of the Improvement Agreement are
on file in the City Clerk’s Office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The developer will be installing 192 new street trees and 28 new streetlights that will be
maintained by the City.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-
quality development that promotes a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 22
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
DRC2020-00202
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 23
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Execute a Deed Transferring Property at the
Cucamonga Station (APNs 0209-272-11 and 0209-272-22) into Joint
Tenancy with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority in
Partial Fulfillment of the Terms of Cooperative Agreement No. CO93-050.
(CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached grant deed
(Attachment 1) transferring the subject property to both the City and the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority as tenants in common, each holding an undivided 50% interest.
BACKGROUND:
In the early 1990s, the City and the San Bernardino Transportation Authority (formerly San
Bernardino Associated Governments) partnered to develop the Cucamonga Station (formerly the
Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station) in coordination with the construction and beginning of
operation of Metrolink Service on the San Bernardino Line that runs from the City of San
Bernardino to Union Station in the City of Los Angeles. As part of this partnership, the City
purchased two parcels on the north side of Azusa Court west of Milliken Avenue to construct the
non-operating portion of the station (i.e., parking lots and bus turnaround). Further, the two
agencies entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 93-050 to outline the roles and responsibilities
for the ownership and operation of the station.
ANALYSIS:
The terms of the Cooperative Station Agreement indicate that the subject parcels are to be held
by the City and SBCTA as tenants in common. However, in researching the history on the
Cucamonga Station property, City and SBCTA staff have determined that the transfer of the
property into tenancy in common has not taken place. Execution and recordation of the attached
grant deed would complete this transfer and fulfill the related requirements of the agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed action under this item transfers property into a joint tenancy in line with the
previously approved agreement and no cost to either party.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Grant Deed
Page 24
-1-
11231-0001\2642602v1.doc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY,
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
1170 W. 3rd Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, California 92410-1715
Attn: Director of Transit & Rail Programs
APN(s): 0209-272-11, 0209-272-22
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PER GOVT. CODE §6103, §27383, §27388.1(a)(2)(D)
EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX PER REV. & TAX CODE §11922
GRANT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (“Grantor”) does hereby grant to
(i) the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation as to an undivided fifty
percent (50%) interest, and (ii) the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY, a county transportation authority pursuant to Public Utility Code §§130800 et. seq.
as to an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest (collectively “Grantee”), as tenants in common, that
certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California, legally described on “Exhibit A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, together with all improvements and fixtures thereon, subject to: (i) the terms of that
certain agreement known as Cooperative Agreement No. CO 93-050 to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, also known as Cooperative Agreement No. C94-001 to San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority, between Grantor and Grantee dated July 21, 1993, as amended,
superseded, or replaced from time to time; (ii) all matters of record; and (iii) all matters that would
be disclosed by an inspection, including all matters that would be disclosed by an ALTA survey
of such property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of the date set forth
below.
Dated: , 2022
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Janice Reynolds, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 25
-2-
11231-0001\2642602v1.doc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 26
11231-0001\2642602v1.doc
EXHIBIT “A”
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Parcel 1
That parcel of land granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the General Dynamics
Corporation in that certain Grant Deed recorded October 6, 1994 in the Official Records of San
Bernardino County, State of California, as Instrument No. 94-409793 and more particularly
described as follows:
That portion of Lot 1 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 1 South, Range 7 West,
San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, as shown on Map of Cucamonga Lands on file in Book 4, page 9 of Maps, in the Office
of the County Recorder of said County, and that portion of 8th Street vacated by the Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Resolution No. 83-99, recorded July 5, 1983, as Instrument No.
83-148882 of Official Records, in said Office of the County Recorder, and being more particularly
described as a whole as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of the northerly 50.00 feet of said Section 13
with the westerly line of the easterly 30.00 feet of said Section 13; thence along said westerly line,
South 00⁰22’01 East 60.00 feet; then South 89⁰52’29” West 333.29 feet; thence South 00⁰07’31”
East 85.65 feet; thence South 43⁰03’10” West 312.10 feet; thence North 30⁰30’30” West 88.10
feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 56.00 feet; thence
northwesterly, westerly, and southerly 132.78 feet along said curve through a central angle of
135⁰50’59”; thence North 46⁰56’50” West 78.54 feet; thence South 89⁰52’29” West 297.43 feet;
thence North 00⁰07’31” West 258.50 feet to said southerly line of the northerly 50.00 feet of said
Section 13; thence along said southerly line North 89⁰52’29” East 1048.81 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 212,252 square feet, more or less.
Said land is a portion of Parcel 1 and a portion of Parcel 2 as said parcels are described in a
Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded June 5, 1989 as Instrument No.
89-202498, Official Records.
Parcel 2
That parcel of land granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the General Dynamics
Corporation in that certain Grant Deed recorded May 4, 1995 in the Official Records of San
Bernardino County, State of California, as Instrument No. 1995-0142856 and more particularly
described as follows:
Parcel 15 of Parcel Map Number 14647, Document Number 95-0111192, recorded in the Official
Records of San Bernardino County, California, April 11, 1995, containing 5.17 acres, more or less.
Page 27
-4-
11231-0001\2642602v1.doc
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Govt. Code § 27281)
This is to certify that the interest in real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, conveyed by the attached Grant Deed from the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, is hereby
accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant
to action of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on ____________, and the grantee
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Description/identification of real property:
San Bernardino County APN 0209-272-11 and APN 0209-272-22
Dated: , 2022 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
Print Name:
Title:
State of California )
County of )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer
completing this certificate verifies only
the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
Page 28
-5-
11231-0001\2642602v1.doc
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Govt. Code § 27281)
This is to certify that the interest in real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, conveyed by the attached Grant Deed from the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, a county
transportation agency pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 130800 et. seq.
(“SBCTA”), is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of SBCTA pursuant to
authority conferred by SBCTA’s Board of Directors, Agenda Item 12, adopted on June 5, 2013,
and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Description/identification of real property:
San Bernardino County APN 0209-272-11 and APN 0209-272-22
Dated: , 2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By:
Print Name:
Title:
State of California )
County of )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer
completing this certificate verifies only
the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
Page 29
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matthew R. Burris, Deputy City Manager, Interim Planning Director
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with
California Government Code Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to
Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 998, Adopting an Interim
Development Code and Official City Of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map,
and Declaring The Urgency Thereof, and Approving an Addendum to a
Certified Final Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Findings
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report in conformance with California
Government Code Section 65858 on the measures taken by the City to alleviate the need for
Interim Ordinance No. 998.
BACKGROUND:
At their regular meeting on May 4, 2022, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 998
adopting an interim Development Code and Official City Zoning Map, pursuant to Government
Code 65858. The temporary interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on June
19, 2022.
ANALYSIS:
Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code provides that, “Ten days prior to the
expiration of that interim ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written
report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the
ordinance.” The 10-day report does not modify nor extend the City’s interim ordinance. Rather,
issuance of the 10-day report satisfies a statutory step in the process to permit the City Council
to consider a potential extension at its June 1, 2022 meeting.
The following specific activities are currently being undertaken to alleviate the conditions which
led to the adoption of Interim Ordinance 998.
City Staff is working to make final refinements as needed to the development code based on
feedback received.
A public hearing notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 6, 2022
notifying the public of the upcoming hearing on May 18 to consider first reading of ordinances
to adopt the revised Development Code and Zoning Map.
Page 30
Page 2
1
2
7
6
A staff report was prepared for the May 18 hearing outlining the revisions to the Development
Code and Zoning Map.
A public hearing to consider first reading to permanently adopt the revised Development Code
and Zoning Map will be conducted during the public hearing portion of the May 18th City
Council meeting.
If the Council votes to conduct first reading of the ordinances to permanently adopt the revised
Development Code and Zoning Map on May 18th, a second reading will be scheduled for June
1st. Ordinances are effective 30 days after second reading, which will make the permanent Code
effective July 1st, 12 days after the expiration of the interim ordinance. Staff will request an
extension of the interim ordinance at the June 1st meeting to keep the interim standards in place
for 12 additional days (June 19th – June 30th) until the Ordinances permanently adopting the
Development Code and Zoning Map become effective (July 1st).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This report supports the Council’s goal of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, and
completing the General Plan and Housing Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 998
Page 31
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital
Project Needs Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027. (RESOLUTION
NO. 2022-054) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Measure “I”
Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis (CPNA) covering Fiscal Years 2022/2027.
BACKGROUND:
Measure "I" 2010-2040, the county-wide transportation sales tax program approved by voters,
requires each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the Valley Major Street and Freeway
Interchange Programs to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis
which outlines the specific projects upon which Measure “I” Major Street and Freeway Interchange
Program funds will be expended.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has prepared the Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis for consideration by the City
Council for adoption. Upon adoption, the CPNA will be kept on file with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for informational purposes. The CPNA consists of a list of
eligible capital improvement projects along with their anticipated costs that have been or are
expected to be constructed during the upcoming five years. Upon completion of a project in the
Plan, the City may seek reimbursement for the Measure “I” share of the project costs based on
the availability of funds allocated to the City. Funds are allocated to the City by the SBCTA Board
on an annual basis and roll-over if not fully expended. The CPNA includes the construction of two
widening projects and traffic signal improvements at seven locations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this item will meet SBCTA Five-Year Capital Needs Analysis requirements allowing
the City to seek reimbursement of eligible expenses in line with SBCTA policy.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-
quality public improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2022-054
Page 59
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
THE MEASURE “I” FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS
ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022/2023 THROUGH
2026/2027
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure “I” in November
2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of
one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated
territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and
traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04-
1 of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from
certain Measure “I” Programs to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs
Analysis.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES to adopt the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Project Needs
Analysis for Fiscal Years 2022/2023 through 2026/2027, a copy of which is attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of May 2022.
Resolution No. 2022-054 – Page 1 of 1 Page 60
Nexus Project Cost 6,000,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$165,000.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 117,650.00 $- $- $- $- $- $-
DEV FEE $ 47,350.00 $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Other: ______ $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
PS&E
Total Cost:$740,541.00
$7,434,218.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 528,007.00 $- $- $- $- $- $-
DEV FEE $ 212,534.00 $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
$5,300,597.00 Other: ______ $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$853,362.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 44,451.00 $- $- $- $- $- $ 563,988.00
DEV FEE $ 17,657.00 $- $- $- $- $- $ 227,019.00
MI LOCAL ST $ 247.00 $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Other: ______ $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$5,675,315.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 2,508,990.00 $- $- $- $- $- $ 1,537,511.00
DEV FEE $ 999,610.00 $- $- $- $- $- $ 530,777.00
MI LOCAL ST $ 10,318.00 $- $- $- $- $- $ 88,109.00
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
- Select Fund - $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Other: ______ $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY
2021/2022 expenses.
31990980
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Wilson Ave from East Ave to
Wardman/Bulloch from 0 to 4
lanes
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 1
EXHIBIT A
Page 61
Nexus Project Cost 305,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$16,640.00
$412,341.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 11,864.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
MI LOCAL ST $ 4,305.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 471.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$293,999.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$395,701.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 282,135.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
MI LOCAL ST $ 113,566.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY
2021/2022 expenses.
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Widen Victoria Ave from,
EHS to I-15
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 2 Page 62
Nexus Project Cost 350,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$13,750.00
$738,737.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$526,720.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$724,987.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY
2021/2022 expenses.
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of Rochester
and Jersey
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 3 Page 63
Nexus Project Cost 350,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$13,750.00
$738,737.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$526,720.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$724,987.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY
2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of Milliken
and 5th
(Actual Fiscal Year 2014/2015 dollars - SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 4 Page 64
Nexus Project Cost 350,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$13,750.00
$738,737.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$526,720.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$724,987.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA
including anticipated FY 2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of East and
Miller
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 5 Page 65
Nexus Project Cost 363,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$12,271.00
$600,297.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 8,749.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 3,522.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$428,012.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$588,026.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 419,263.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 168,763.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA
including anticipated FY 2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of Carnelian
and Banyan
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 6 Page 66
Nexus Project Cost 363,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$7,920.00
$595,946.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 5,647.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 2,273.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$424,910.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$588,026.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 419,263.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 168,763.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA
including anticipated FY 2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of 6th and
Utica
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 7 Page 67
Nexus Project Cost 350,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$13,750.00
$738,737.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$526,720.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$724,987.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA
including anticipated FY 2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of 6th and
Rochester
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 8 Page 68
Nexus Project Cost 350,000$ Public Share:71.3%Dev. Share:28.70%Dev. Loan?No 5-Year Advance?No
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FUTURE
PA&ED
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PS&E
Total Cost:$45,891.00
$1,082,710.00 Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 32,720.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 13,171.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$771,973.00 Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Summation of Measure I)ROW
Total Cost:$0.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Comments:CONST
Total Cost:$1,036,819.00
Fund Type:MSI Arterial $ 739,253.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DEV FEE $ 297,566.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- Select Fund - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other: ______ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA
including anticipated FY 2021/2022 expenses.
Total Project Cost:
Total Measure I Request:
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
Construct a Traffic Signal at
the Intersection of 6th and
Hellman
CPNA Rancho Cucamonga_5-11-22 - Proj 9 Page 69
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special
Assessments and Liens for Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2022-051) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the report from Burrtec
Waste Industries, Inc. (Burrtec) for delinquent solid waste accounts, and authorizing the
placement of special assessments and liens against the respective parcels of land to be collected
for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the same time and manner as ordinary county ad valorem
property taxes.
BACKGROUND:
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 8.17.170, establishes the requirements for
mandatory payment for residential, commercial, and industrial solid waste collection services. As
a result, the municipal code requires all occupied properties within the City to have weekly solid
waste collection service, provided by the existing franchise waste hauler, or comply with the
requirements of the self-haul permit program administered by City staff. This section of the code
allows fees that are delinquent for more than 60 days to become special assessments against
the respective parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the delinquent
fee, plus administrative charges.
Annually, Burrtec provides a list of accounts that are delinquent by more than 60 days. City staff
reviews the list and property owner addresses to correct any discrepancies that might prevent a
property owner from receiving the Public Hearing Notice. The address that is used for the
notification is the address on file with the County Tax Assessor at the time of the reviewing period.
The Public Hearing Notice is then mailed to the property owner by certified mail no less than 10
days prior to the Public Hearing date.
ANALYSIS:
The City received a list of delinquent solid waste accounts from Burrtec on March 4, 2022. The
list included delinquent accounts that accrued between January 1, 2021, through December 31,
2021, that are past due by more than 60 days. An updated list was provided by Burrtec on March
28, 2022, amended to remove properties with accounts that had been paid and cleared of
delinquent charges and have been adjusted by staff to account for property ownership changes.
A Notice of Public Hearing was mailed on April 21, 2022, to 1,119 property owners with delinquent
Page 70
Page 2
1
2
6
5
solid waste accounts. In addition, a Notice of Public Hearing was placed in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper on May 3, 2022.
The current list of delinquent accounts is included in the attached Resolution as Exhibit A and
includes 1,119 delinquent accounts, for a total of $404,306.77. Property owners that are currently
on the delinquency list have until July 11, 2022, to submit payment to Burrtec. The final list of
delinquent accounts (excluding those that were paid by July 11, 2022) will then be submitted to
the County Tax Collector for the 20222023 tax roll. As of May 2, 2022, City staff responded to 13
inquiries from property owners and the City Clerk has received zero written protests.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will receive revenue in the form of franchise fees along with associated administrative
fees when the delinquent accounts are paid through the County of San Bernardino property tax
collection process.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item is in line with Council core values, by ensuring all residential, commercial, and industrial
property owners are receiving mandatory trash service to ensure a healthy and safe community
for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2022-051
Attachment 2 - Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts
Page 71
ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2022-051 - Page 1 of 2
2
4
1
9
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-051
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF
DELINQUENT CHARGES FROM BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND AND SHALL BE COLLECTED FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE
SAME MANNER AS ORDINARY COUNTY AD VALOREM PROPERTY
TAXES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
requires every person who occupies any developed real property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga
whether at a residential, commercial, or industrial location, or otherwise shall make or cause to be made
with the City of Rancho Cucamonga authorized agent, appropriate arrangements for regular solid waste
collection services and it is unlawful for any such person to fail, refuse or neglect to do so; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 the solid waste collection fee shall be a civil debt owing
or due to the City of Rancho Cucamonga or its authorized agent or contractor from the occupant or property
owner required to have service under this Chapter. An invoice for solid waste collection service unpaid for
sixty (60) days is considered delinquent; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 any fees authorized pursuant to this Chapter which
remain unpaid after the delinquent date as set forth in this Chapter may be collected by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as provided in this Section; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has caused to be prepared a report of delinquent charges; and
WHEREAS, a copy of said report is attached hereto, marked Exhibit A and made a part of this
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled 7:00 p.m. on May 18, 2022, at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California as the time and
place for hearing the report and any objections or protests thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council caused notice of the hearing to be mailed certified to the property
owners listed on the report, at their addresses as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, not less
than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the City Council heard all objections or protests of property owners, or
their representatives, liable to be assessed for delinquent charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has made such revisions and corrections to the report as it deems
just.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Page 72
Resolution No. 2022-051 - Page 2 of 2
2
4
1
9
Section 1. That the delinquent charges for solid waste collection set forth in the report attached hereto as
Exhibit A are hereby confirmed.
Section 2. That pursuant to California Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831, the delinquent
charges set forth in the confirmed report shall constitute special assessments against the respective
parcels of land and is a lien on the property for the amount of the delinquent charges.
Section 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to file a certified copy of this Resolution, including the confirmed
report, with the San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller for the amounts of the respective assessments
against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment (tax) roll.
Section 4. That the City Clerk is instructed to record a certified copy of this Resolution, including the
confirmed report, in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Section 5. Collection Procedure. That the assessments shall be collected for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county ad valorem property
taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case
of delinquency as provided for those taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of
county ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such assessment, except that if any real property
to which such lien would attach has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if
a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on
which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then the lien which would otherwise be
imposed by this section shall not attach to such real property and the delinquent charges, as confirmed,
relating to such property shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18 day of May 2022.
Page 73
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
Parcel Number Property Owner Name Service Address Total
0201092130000 LI, QINGYUN 10960 BELCANTO DR 306.78$
0201102220000 HARPS, TYHESHA FAMILY TR 10/7/11 9868 VIA ESPERANZA 207.50$
0201102230000 HUANG, HAO 9878 VIA ESPERANZA 199.02$
0201102290000 LIN, YIYI 6310 CALLE HERMOSO 257.04$
0201122140000 YUAN, CHENFEI 10889 MIRADOR DR 480.84$
0201142080000 LEWIS, KENNETH A 9729 MANZANITA DR 185.48$
0201174160000 WHELCHEL, SAMUEL A 5915 TIMBERMIST PL 289.70$
0201212240000 OCHOA REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 0 8488 HUNTER DR 480.84$
0201244010000 ROJAS, AUREA F 5708 WINCHESTER CT 368.70$
0201251350000 IBELIEVE LTD 6275 ARCHIBALD AVE 343.60$
0201301050000 PURDY, KEVIN M 6246 MAYBERRY AVE 480.84$
0201304170000 WEBSITE PURCHASES INC 6221 KINLOCK AVE 257.64$
0201304200000 FARMER‐SALAZAR, CHRISTOPHER 10202 LA GLORIA DR 215.20$
0201304240000 NARDI, GRACIELA 6230 MALVERN AVE 220.62$
0201341070000 HARDIN, HAZEL LAVERNE 9238 19TH ST 215.20$
0201341300000 IVERY, LAMONT 9161 GARDEN ST 624.54$
0201341330000 WEHRLE, WILLIAM 9160 HEATHER ST 199.02$
0201341540000 MICRO CT AZ ML DIVISION LLC 6690 HELLMAN AVE 575.58$
0201356320000 DENIS, RAYMUNDO A 11020 APPOMATTOX CT 199.02$
0201362020000 NNAM, MELVINA C 6210 FILKINS AVE 401.44$
0201394250000 MC CRACKEN, RYAN 6404 ALEATICO PL 480.84$
0201413020000 SLAUGHTER‐COLLI, JACQUELINE 8250 GARDEN CT 286.05$
0201474500000 NORTHGATE EQUITY GROUP LLC 6633 SUGARPINE PL 199.02$
0201554200000 TORRES, EDWARD JOSEPH 10394 MAHOGANY CT 370.32$
0201563200000 KORANDA, BRENDA LIVING TR 12/14/10 10300 SOUTHRIDGE DR 202.28$
0201563370000 SHARIF, JESSIE 10295 SOUTHRIDGE DR 480.84$
0201573110000 MELENDEZ, MARIO E 10211 SOUTHRIDGE DR 480.84$
0201573550000 ZALDIVAR, JORGE 10162 THORPE CT 480.84$
0201583200000 HUDSON, SHELDON 10282 KERNWOOD CT 439.12$
0201583460000 EDMON, RICH 10287 CORALWOOD CT 575.58$
0201584180000 BAO, YUHUA 10198 SADDLEHILL TER 369.46$
0201594120000 TAYLOR, JOHN 6124 CALLAWAY PL 480.84$
0201632690000 CARRETO, JOSE 6311 SEMILLON PL 575.58$
0201632830000 GASSNER, TERRY 6349 WINE CT 368.70$
0201663250000 VASQUEZ, MICHAEL 11078 CEDAR CREEK DR 215.20$
0201691560000 WANG, WEIFENG 6228 RAMONA AVE 196.60$
0201691690000 SAENZ, DEREK X 9920 LEMON AVE 480.84$
0201691700000 KREIS, LYDIA E LIVING TRUST 9910 LEMON AVE 267.96$
0201711120000 MENDEZ, ALBERTO 9378 HIGHLAND AVE 370.32$
0201711230000 EDWARDS FAMILY LIVING TRUST 8/6526 AMETHYST AVE 190.58$
0201721060000 PALO TRUST (11‐22‐95)9240 HIGHLAND AVE 294.66$
0201721090000 NELSON, MICHAEL D 9210 HIGHLAND AVE 199.02$
0201731140000 NUNEZ, JESSICA 6326 HALSTED AVE 259.80$
0201731210000 CARRILLO, STEVEN C 6345 KINLOCK AVE 275.58$
0201741230000 WATLING, JEFFREY C 6383 REVERE AVE 396.62$
0201751050000 TRINITY FINANCIAL SERVICES 6415 REVERE AVE 188.80$
0201761320000 RILEY, PHILLIPA A 6171 KINLOCK AVE 670.32$
0201782040000 LEWIS, RITCHIE M 11154 ANTIETAM DR 480.84$
0201811190000 PIETRASZ, RICHARD M 6635 TOPAZ ST 368.70$
0201821410000 10370 BANYAN LLC 10370 BANYAN ST 199.02$
0201901320000 DIXON, GORDON L III 10087 BRISTOL DR 330.84$
0201922140000 LI, XINYING 11269 SKYVIEW LN 370.32$
0201922330000 DELA CRUZ, LUCILA SANCHEZ 6320 SILVERWOOD PL 271.36$
0201922400000 FANG, FENGMING 11220 VINTAGE DR 257.04$
0201932350000 WANG, RUIJIE 6211 MORNING PL 199.02$
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 Page 74
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0201932360000 SHEN, XIAOYIN 6221 MORNING PL 480.84$
0201932370000 LUCK, JOHN WILLIAM 6231 MORNING PL 199.83$
0201932580000 REN, WENLI 6240 MOONSHADOW PL 245.69$
0201942350000 TEK, KONITHA CHEAR & ANTHONY C LIV 6100 SOFTWIND PL 370.32$
0201981030000 SHEN, YE 5935 ELMHURST AVE 199.02$
0202021450000 CHEN, XIAO MEI 6760 JASPER ST 241.36$
0202021460000 ARNOLD, KEITH M 6772 JASPER ST 328.87$
0202021480000 SWAVELY, AL 8458 HAMILTON ST 199.02$
0202061180000 GOMEZ, MARIA ANTONIA 9349 19TH ST 375.58$
0202071120000 BENJAMIN FAMILY TRUST 3/31/94 7034 AMETHYST AVE 278.04$
0202071130000 BLATNICK, ANTON J III REVOCABLE TR 3 9496 LA VINE ST 199.02$
0202072160000 LOH, WEI‐TSU TRUST 10/21/09 9437 LA VINE ST 199.02$
0202081110000 MARTINEZ, HECTOR 9415 LA GRANDE ST 480.84$
0202081160000 KAVIKAM LLC 9491 LA GRANDE ST 466.20$
0202081390000 JOHNSON, JOHN P 9392 LOMITA DR 329.92$
0202083120000 LEPE, JOSE 7175 LAYTON ST 199.02$
0202091220000 RIOS, RICHARD F LIVING TRUST 10/23/ 7245 HELLMAN AVE 199.02$
0202102460000 PERALES, RAYMOND & ANA LIVING TR 07/ 6610 BRIGHTON PL 446.88$
0202111600000 DESEVRENJACQUET, NICKOLAS S 6713 KLUSMAN AVE 201.78$
0202131390000 MIRANDA, BELIA 9633 MONTE VISTA ST 575.58$
0202131670000 ZARAGOZA, CARLOS 9511 MONTE VISTA ST 340.14$
0202161050000 ROBERDS RANCHO LLC 9548 ROBERDS CT 301.50$
0202193120000 MANGUNSONG, WESLEY 8391 DERFER DR 194.20$
0202193160000 RIVAS, TOMAS ALEJANDRO 8357 DERFER DR 399.47$
0202243050000 MORAGA, JULIE R 7205 EASTWOOD AVE 240.84$
0202251340000 PENAFIEL, DANIEL E 8451 MONTE VISTA ST 199.02$
0202252070000 LOVE, IMELDA 8510 AVALON CT 257.04$
0202262080000 HAMILTON, MARTINA R LIVING TR 10/5/1 8626 MONTE VISTA ST 199.02$
0202264080000 GUPTA, ASHVINI 8691 AVALON CT 199.02$
0202264130000 MCILVAIN, RAYMOND B JR 8661 18TH ST 425.58$
0202273080000 BIRCHEFF, LOUIS & DARLA FAM TR 9/21/ 8621 LA GRANDE ST 424.62$
0202284020000 RAAEN, ERIC D 8479 LA GRANDE ST 315.06$
0202285010000 ROBERTS, GERALD W 7022 CAMEO ST 480.84$
0202291180000 CHEN, NINA XIAONING 7057 GARNET ST 215.06$
0202293080000 RAMIREZ, MANUEL 9015 LA VINE ST 215.20$
0202304040000 CASTELLANOS, RAY 8714 AVALON ST 215.20$
0202321150000 DIXON, RANDALL 9151 LA RONDA ST 305.84$
0202322180000 HARVEY, JOHN C 9152 CIELITO ST 480.84$
0202351080000 HENRICH, CHRISTOPHER 6820 CORAL CT 480.84$
0202351110000 BELL, DAVID S 6819 AMBER CT 453.84$
0202351210000 SPENCER, CASSIE 6844 EMERALD ST 480.84$
0202351310000 AGUILAR, RIGOBERTO 6867 CARNELIAN ST 198.52$
0202351340000 MATHIESEN, DEVEN K 6833 CARNELIAN ST 480.84$
0202352150000 HOLMES, GALE GEORGE 8763 MIGNONETTE ST 215.20$
0202352180000 RIVERA, YENNIE 8793 MIGNONETTE ST 276.40$
0202353100000 BENEFIEL, WILDA J 8859 HOLLY ST 330.84$
0202372070000 HUANG, SAMUEL JR 7121 SONOMA AVE 199.02$
0202372100000 ORTEGA, FERNANDO R 8668 LA PAIX ST 368.70$
0202372200000 NASCIMENTO, IAN 8562 LA PAIX ST 375.58$
0202374130000 DUNCAN, CARI LOUISE REVOCABLE TR 4/1 7174 TOPAZ ST 215.58$
0202376070000 MOODY, KATHERINE R 7121 NAPA AVE 575.58$
0202376110000 ALVARADO, SHARON ANN 7154 SONOMA AVE 236.10$
0202392040000 SCHEIFFELE, KARL P 6938 EASTWOOD AVE 315.06$
0202412100000 WELLER, DANIELLE 6810 CAMEO ST 315.06$
0202413020000 JUHASZ, TIBOR 6879 CAMEO ST 594.66$
0202461030000 PACHECO, SUSAN F 8903 GALA AVE 257.04$
Page 2 Page 75
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0202461160000 ZAMESNIK, SUSAN M 8977 HAMILTON ST 255.00$
0202541070000 GLENN, ROBERT A JR 6768 AMBER CT 320.59$
0202541240000 SMITH, RICHARD W 8878 HAMILTON ST 480.84$
0202541470000 KENNEDY, JANE 8892 GALA AVE 480.84$
0202571160000 OROVECZ, DIANE FAMILY TRUST 9441 MONTE VISTA ST 207.84$
0202571550000 ORTIZ, ALEX R 6960 ONYX AVE 219.36$
0202571590000 ALPERT FAMILY TRUST 3/24/20 6947 KIRKWOOD AVE 257.04$
0202741910000 MAC EWEN, DAWN REVOCABLE TR 10‐30‐14 8985 SAGE DR 199.02$
0202744040000 RAULYS TRUST 10/24/1995 6821 SAUSALITO CT 370.32$
0202745030000 SILVA, KENDALL & GENEVIEVE FAM TR5‐1 6880 SADDLEBACK PL 425.58$
0202745350000 HANIF, UZMA 8925 TANGLEWOOD CT 199.02$
0202822300000 CHEN, PEILING 6833 SPRINGVIEW PL 480.84$
0202822320000 AZAROVITZ, TAMI 6849 SPRINGVIEW PL 380.84$
0202822450000 FITZGERALD, JASON L 6834 SPRINGVIEW PL 370.32$
0207022130000 ROSALES, HUGO 7520 CARNELIAN ST 307.52$
0207041060000 HUDSON, JAIME 7520 CAMINO NORTE 315.06$
0207044070000 BEATON, NORMA LEE 7562 VALLE VISTA DR 257.04$
0207044290000 MASHKOTIAZAD, KAIVAN 7563 ALTA CUESTA DR 361.01$
0207051020000 PINOCHET, YEISI K 7608 BUENA VISTA DR 381.52$
0207053260000 YORKE, LESMA 7707 BUENA VISTA DR 480.84$
0207053360000 SPRING SUNRISE 7717 BUENA VISTA DR 341.00$
0207082600000 POWERS FAMILY TRUST 8/9/1978 8506 RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DR 391.64$
0207123160000 GIDWANI, KIRAN D 8267 TAPIA VIA 466.20$
0207123410000 HICKS, LANIETA 8268 RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DR 480.84$
0207141090000 GONZALEZ, ELSA 8159 TAPIA VIA 480.84$
0207141180000 HARSHA, ROGER G 8223 TAPIA VIA 257.04$
0207141510000 TORRES, FRANK JR 8140 TAPIA VIA 212.24$
0207161150000 NORIEGA, CHRISTOPHER J 8140 AVENIDA VEJAR 256.62$
0207161350000 YEUNG, RAYMOND YUE TING 8242 PLACIDA CT 480.84$
0207161430000 TELADA, MARCUS B 8265 PLACIDA CT 370.32$
0207171060000 DENNY, DONALD M 8157 AVENIDA VEJAR 220.32$
0207171120000 VARGAS, JOSE 8213 AVENIDA VEJAR 270.32$
0207171160000 WONG, STEVEN KOK 8251 AVENIDA VEJAR 199.02$
0207171250000 ENCISO, MICHAEL C 8214 ARROW RTE 199.02$
0207201040000 SANDERS, LYNDA REVOCABLE LIV TR 11/1 8556 ARROW RTE 197.04$
0207201370000 MENDEZ, GONZALO 8604 ARROW RTE 199.02$
0207234080000 HARO FAMILY LIVING TRUST 3/20/8607 SIERRA MADRE AVE 205.58$
0207241450000 CARDENAS INVESTMENTS LLC 8715 GROVE AVE 670.32$
0207242100000 HSIUNG, CHANYI 8185 9TH ST 199.02$
0207242110000 PACHECO, JOSEPHINE 8193 9TH ST 240.88$
0207243020000 GUTIERREZ LIVING TRUST 8785 VINMAR AVE 257.04$
0207243040000 BLANCO, DAVID 8763 VINMAR AVE 191.36$
0207243070000 DING, EDRIC KUANG HENG FAM TR 6/24/8730 VINMAR AVE 480.84$
0207243110000 CERDA FAMILY TRUST 7/8/13 8255 9TH ST 466.20$
0207342250000 WANG, JUN 8525 VINMAR AVE 405.84$
0207343010000 MARTINEZ, CONNIE M 8597 SIERRA MADRE AVE 331.68$
0207351070000 SIMS, BENNIE JR 8384 VIA LADERA 348.71$
0207352060000 FREMMING, RANDY 7395 VIA PARAISO 434.26$
0207353290000 MIRANDA, MARK 7452 VIA PARAISO 199.02$
0207382020000 NUNEZ, SERGIO 8614 COMET ST 191.36$
0207382200000 CATALAN, JOSE A 8605 EDWIN ST 340.14$
0207421220000 SOLIS, MARIA I 7708 ARROYO VISTA AVE 380.84$
0207422100000 PLUMERI, PETER C 7730 VINEYARD AVE 224.36$
0207424140000 LOPEZ, NICHOLAS A 7740 SACRAMENTO AVE 199.02$
0207441140000 ESPINOZA, WILLIAM S FAMILY LIVING TR 7629 EL ARCO ST 480.84$
0207451010000 ROBLES, ROBERT 8512 HYACINTH ST 294.66$
Page 3 Page 76
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0207452070000 ISAACS, JOHN K 8567 JASPER ST 199.02$
0207454020000 PEREZ, LUIS 8588 EDWIN ST 480.84$
0207531090000 COBOS, GUSTAVO 8780 EDWIN ST 812.40$
0207531640000 SAMUEL, EDWARD 8755 COMET ST 372.06$
0207531660000 TORRES, VICTOR M 8732 COMET ST 199.02$
0207541020000 PANG, SAMUEL LIVING TRUST 04/25/201 8804 EDWIN ST 368.70$
0207541470000 DOSHI, AROON & BHARATI FAMILY TR 7‐1 8357 CHAFFEE ST 480.84$
0207551120000 SOMSANA, SOT 7679 ARROYO VISTA AVE 291.44$
0207551390000 ABDELGWAD, MOHAMED S 7507 SUNSTONE AVE 480.84$
0207551510000 BECHTEL, BRENDA 8753 BALSA ST 199.02$
0207561280000 MUDRY, LINDA M 8792 CALUMA CT 368.70$
0207561360000 SHU, CHRIS CAN 7425 CARNELIAN ST 199.02$
0207591430000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8470 MORENO DR 185.48$
0207591470000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8455 MORENO DR 252.04$
0207591510000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8464 DITMAR DR 427.67$
0207591520000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8464 DITMAR DR 343.64$
0207591570000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8471 DITMAR DR 295.56$
0207591600000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8483 CARSON PL 301.20$
0207591620000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8480 CARSON PL 391.20$
0207591700000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8440 CARSON PL 360.44$
0207601320000 LEE, NANNIE M TRUST (1‐15‐05)7730 CALLE CLARIN 670.32$
0207622140000 COVARRUBIAS, VIOLET 8564 SAN JACINTO CT 195.32$
0207622290000 UGAS, EVA 8573 SAN JACINTO CT 257.64$
0207622430000 YU, ALEXANDRA CHIYIN SZETO 8527 ARROW RTE 560.94$
0207623190000 HEATH, JOY 8592 BALDY VISTA DR 241.35$
0207661050000 SILVA, FRANCISCO J 8168 HIGHRIDGE PL 330.84$
0207671110000 BERNAL, DAVID 8716 TIMBERWOOD CT 306.78$
0207691420000 CURTIS, JAMES A 8726 WOODWARD CT 425.58$
0207701050000 FARINO, LILIANA 8714 GRAND OAKS CT 199.02$
0207701130000 WU, DYLAN 8720 SIERRA VIEW CT 480.84$
0207701270000 SUPOTO, MEIJIJATI 8758 SIERRA VIEW CT 227.43$
0207711100000 HASSAN, TAMER A 7576 ANTIGUA PL 257.04$
0207721050000 JAKE, ARDRIA 8059 CITY VIEW PL 315.06$
0207721070000 MX INVESTMENT LLC 8063 CITY VIEW PL 480.84$
0207721170000 DEEB, SALEM 8733 OLIVE TREE DR 196.26$
0207722020000 WU, SISI 8039 CITY VIEW PL 480.84$
0207722320000 KOO, CHOON SIL 8027 CITY VIEW PL 315.06$
0207722330000 SU, SHUANG 8029 CITY VIEW PL 199.02$
0207731100000 SUBUYUJ, JOHANNA MORALES 8692 9TH ST 252.04$
0207731130000 TSAI, PING HAN 8692 9TH ST 196.52$
0207731210000 GILCHRIST, KIRSTIN KOOIMAN 8692 9TH ST 196.52$
0207741240000 OZKARAHAN, AHMET K 8567 CAVA DR 245.96$
0207741310000 HE, LIZHENG 8553 CAVA DR 370.32$
0207742050000 GANDAPERMANA, WILLIAM 8616 CAVA DR 315.06$
0207742400000 DU, LEI 8635 CAVA DR 480.84$
0207751100000 KANG, JIAN 8627 ADEGA DR 251.52$
0208011230000 VARGAS, ADRIAN 7350 LION ST 257.04$
0208073410000 PULICARI, MICHAEL 7609 LION ST 624.54$
0208123040000 CONTRERAS, EMMANUEL 7840 JADEITE AVE 370.32$
0208127110000 D&J PROPERTIES INC 9621 TRYON ST 368.70$
0208131100000 CORRAO, SALUATORE 9670 SAN BERNARDINO RD 208.86$
0208141420000 CHANDLER, DARREN 9328 FOOTHILL BLVD 280.93$
0208141500000 REMEDIOS, LALITA M REVOCABLE TR 12/1 9455 SAN BERNARDINO RD 480.84$
0208141580000 MATHEW, JINS 9399 SAN BERNARDINO RD 204.92$
0208142370000 ZENG, DAFANG 9468 JACK RABBIT DR 193.88$
0208151500000 QUIHUIS, ROBERT MICHAEL 8031 PUEBLO PL 196.52$
Page 4 Page 77
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0208162070000 AGUILAR, FRANCISCO 7529 EVEREST PL 425.58$
0208272030000 DAVILA‐BERMUDEZ, GLORIA I 8460 KIRKWOOD AVE 213.60$
0208272440000 JINZHI , ZHANG 9373 FRIANT ST 225.22$
0208272450000 YBARRA, RUBEN 9383 FRIANT ST 425.58$
0208272580000 WRIGHT, KENNETH P 9468 FRIANT ST 215.20$
0208272600000 LOPEZ, JAVIER F 9446 FRIANT ST 262.40$
0208281190000 AYALA, ARTHUR J JR AND LAVERNE R 8177 ARCHIBALD AVE 199.02$
0208282200000 ARRIAGADA, LIONEL 9738 HAMPSHIRE ST 399.54$
0208283030000 HERNANDEZ, DIANA M 8255 BURGUNDY AVE 199.02$
0208291020000 GRABER, JANICE Y 9786 ARROW RTE 470.58$
0208291340000 VILLALVAZO, FRANCISCO 9745 CERISE ST 575.58$
0208302030000 SHEEHAN FAMILY TRUST 09/09/98 8255 MALVEN AVE 368.70$
0208302050000 NAVAZI, FRANCISCO 8233 MALVEN AVE 286.05$
0208303200000 CAVENDER, JOHN P 8278 RAMONA AVE 242.26$
0208311520000 FIEL, RICHARD R 9809 PLACER ST 369.58$
0208312400000 AI WO ESTATES INC 9830 ARROW RTE 299.02$
0208363170000 PADILLA, JULIO G TR 9281 CALLE VEJAR 196.06$
0208363310000 RODRIGUEZ, MANUEL M 9180 ARROW RTE 463.44$
0208372060000 BOXLER, JUAN C 9612 HAMPSHIRE ST 425.58$
0208372150000 FOLINO, ROBERT GENE LIVING TRUST 8159 MALACHITE AVE 218.76$
0208374060000 CARR, TIMOTHY R 8223 MALACHITE AVE 215.20$
0208375050000 ALVAREZ, DANIEL 8233 LEUCITE AVE 417.80$
0208377040000 MEJIA, STEVE 8235 JADEITE AVE 434.26$
0208377060000 HARMON, JASEN M 8215 JADEITE AVE 396.62$
0208377120000 SALAZAR, JESUS JR 8188 ARCHIBALD AVE 585.38$
0208382020000 BLACK, FRANK P AND MARTHA M TR 9560 DEVON ST 199.00$
0208383030000 VELASQUEZ, DAVID 9586 DEVON ST 207.38$
0208385040000 ESCALANTE, EDELMIRA T 9668 DEVON ST 305.72$
0208391030000 GALINDO, ANTONIO HERIBERTO 7906 MONTARA AVE 575.58$
0208392030000 CASTELLANOS, LUIS 7921 SELMA AVE 391.36$
0208421090000 LOLA, MARIA E 9385 PALO ALTO ST 434.26$
0208421140000 MORONEZ, ROSA I 9435 PALO ALTO ST 199.02$
0208432090000 ESTRADA, ANTHONY 7375 LAYTON ST 480.84$
0208433140000 MOORE, CEDRIC A 9391 PEPPER ST 480.84$
0208433180000 GWAY, JEFFREY J 7374 LAYTON ST 211.32$
0208441110000 LIM, BERNARD 8980 BALSA ST 380.84$
0208441180000 PADILLA, RUSSELL 7534 ZIRCON AVE 199.02$
0208442130000 GUDIEL, JORGE ALBERTO SOLORZANO (SP‐7575 ZIRCON AVE 315.06$
0208443040000 CHARRETTE, STEVEN M 8935 CANDLEWOOD ST 215.20$
0208444070000 PERRY, PETER A 9046 YEW ST 199.02$
0208451160000 BRUNNER, MICHAEL STEVEN 7505 SPINEL AVE 199.02$
0208461010000 ROOF, ERIC T 7782 LION ST 199.02$
0208462010000 LEWIS, JANAE 7925 LION ST 480.84$
0208476070000 BAHNSEN, JANICE B REV TR 11/16/07 9540 GLENWOOD ST 218.76$
0208502050000 KING, KENYON M LIVING TRUST 12‐10‐0 9100 HEMLOCK ST 499.54$
0208502080000 RYAN, RICHARD REVOCABLE TR 12/17/15 7739 BERYL ST 480.84$
0208511070000 HUFFER, DANIELLE MARIE 7745 MONTARA AVE 241.62$
0208521180000 SANTIAGO‐PACHEC, FROEBEL 9440 SAN BERNARDINO RD 199.02$
0208532040000 TOSTE, ANA CRISTINA BETTENCOURT 7815 AMETHYST AVE 255.84$
0208533050000 FOOTE, KAREN C 7830 AMETHYST AVE 670.32$
0208541060000 ESPINOZA, FRANCISCO JAVIER 9545 PEPPER ST 257.04$
0208543120000 LIEBHERR, ERIK L 7425 AMETHYST AVE 412.14$
0208561060000 COMMUNITY RENEWAL LLC 9446 BALSA ST 322.80$
0208563010000 KIM, JEFFREY 7685 AMETHYST AVE 225.58$
0208563090000 MARTINEZ, DEBORAH 7595 AMETHYST AVE 499.92$
0208571100000 TIM, BUNTHOEUN & PATRICIA FM TR 12 7605 LEUCITE AVE 330.84$
Page 5 Page 78
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0208591080000 KEUM, JANGHO 7366 AGATE ST 250.59$
0208593180000 BELAND, LYNETTE CHALCRAFT 7398 BERYL ST 480.84$
0208593210000 CASTRO, HERIBERTO L 9048 ALDER ST 199.02$
0208651070000 GUTIERREZ, ELVIA 7924 KIRKWOOD CT 480.84$
0208651130000 ASGHARZADEH, MEHDI A 7925 KIRKWOOD CT 184.36$
0208692060000 WILLIAMS, KENNETH 9230 PERSIMMON AVE 301.02$
0208703110000 MUNOZ, JOSE MARIA 7775 LEUCITE AVE 480.84$
0208711180000 CIOCCA, ALFRED J 7688 PEPPER ST 370.32$
0208712030000 GARCIA, JULIA 9140 CHURCH ST 198.84$
0208713130000 BACHMAN, ADDISON 7606 LION ST 241.38$
0208713170000 HOPCUS, JAMES ROBERT JR 7662 LION ST 257.04$
0208741120000 MACCHARLES, JAMIE 7866 HICKORY CIR 425.58$
0208742110000 RICHARDS, MICHELLE M 8906 HEMLOCK ST 466.58$
0208752240000 FERRARI, WILLIAM S 7937 SUMMERLIN PL 205.06$
0208752280000 YE, JUNCHAO 7977 SUMMERLIN PL 370.32$
0208761010000 CHIECHI, FRANK D 8289 AMETHYST AVE 204.54$
0208761870000 LANINI, JEREMY 8278 KIRKWOOD CT 480.84$
0208772210000 2013‐1 IH BORROWER LP 9309 PLACER ST 196.26$
0208772460000 RUHL, FRANCINE 9359 KONOCTI ST 480.84$
0208772510000 ORTIZ, ROSE 8403 HELMS AVE 480.84$
0208772630000 NGO, VINH 9441 DEVON ST 480.84$
0208772740000 STARLITE MGMT VIII LP 9454 PLACER ST 215.20$
0208772920000 WACHTER, JASON D 9445 KONOCTI ST 289.40$
0208801290000 DAMBRA, MARIA J 9521 PLACER ST 383.20$
0208811320000 COLEMAN, CHARLES 8454 KLUSMAN AVE 222.28$
0208811510000 FISHER, SCOTT 8435 MALACHITE AVE 280.84$
0208831380000 ROGERS, KENNETH J 9028 DUBONNET DR 315.06$
0208851290000 BONORRIS, PAUL 8249 MALVERN AVE 199.02$
0208861140000 MYERS, JESSICA A 10164 HAMPSHIRE ST 442.74$
0208901560000 ZAPIRTAN, GABRIEL 8264 AVENIDA LEON 229.49$
0208931260000 WU, KEVIN H 9003 YEW ST 306.78$
0208931400000 COUNTRY GARDEN INVESTMENT INC 7647 ZIRCON AVE 312.30$
0208931480000 HUNTER, PAUL 7678 ZIRCON AVE 325.58$
0208991380000 HERBERT, NATHANIEL 9360 TRYON ST 480.84$
0209052020000 REYES, JOSEPH J 9880 FERON BLVD 289.40$
0209052090000 GONZALEZ, DAVID 9845 JERSEY BLVD 201.12$
0209063120000 REYES, MONICA L 9893 FERON BLVD 257.04$
0209063170000 GOMEZ, RAFAEL VALLE 9866 MAIN ST 480.84$
0209063210000 WOOD, STEVEN J 9838 MAIN ST 392.61$
0209071070000 LOPEZ, JESUS H 8785 RAMONA AVE 197.64$
0209085120000 RODRIGUEZ, EDUARDO 10077 MAIN ST 352.25$
0209102090000 GOLGOTHA SANCTUARY MINISTRY 10171 25TH ST 447.14$
0209102170000 SADIQ, YOUSEF 10162 24TH ST 370.32$
0209104180000 MEZA, RUBEN 10268 24TH ST 203.66$
0209111190000 RODRIGUEZ, RACHEL 8863 HERMOSA AVE 223.38$
0209121100000 DELGADO, CARLOTTA ‐ EST OF 10335 26TH ST 295.84$
0209121310000 ARSHAWSKY FAMILY TRUST 10390 26TH ST 575.58$
0209122020000 GARCIA, MERCEDES R 8793 CENTER AVE 251.12$
0209123150000 CARDENAS, ANGELINA 10377 24TH ST 199.02$
0209171400000 PRIHISZTAL EVA 2014 REVOCABLE 2556 CLIFF RD 423.80$
0209191050000 BIRCHEFF, LOUIS & DARLA FAM TR 9/21/ 8943 ARCHIBALD AVE 185.92$
0209281150000 CARRILLO, ROBERTO 8660 RAMONA AVE 322.98$
0209281170000 ROSALES, MARCIAL 8678 RAMONA AVE 205.84$
0209284050000 DEATER, RICHARD E 8525 RAMONA AVE 302.96$
0209292130000 TORRES, ANGEL B TAN 9385 DEERBROOK ST 425.58$
0209292140000 CASTILLO, ALFRED 9395 DEERBROOK ST 289.40$
Page 6 Page 79
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0209294030000 SWANGEL, MARK W 9243 AMETHYST AVE 331.36$
0209295010000 GRIJALVA, NAOMI 9396 6TH ST 480.84$
0209312040000 ORTIZ, ANTONIO 8634 FERNWOOD DR 480.84$
0209312100000 PEREZ, ELSA 8671 PINE DR 199.84$
0209312180000 YIN, TIEGANG 8620 PINE DR 480.84$
0209312570000 RICHARD, JAMES C 8670 CEDAR DR 191.96$
0209312610000 WWP HOLDINGS LLC 9975 MCKINLEY ST 214.92$
0209312740000 DEBACA, ANACANI DORINA 10073 MCKINLEY ST 480.84$
0209321530000 UDDIN, MOHAMMAD K 9600 DEERBROOK ST 306.69$
0209341300000 NGUYEN, HOANG MINH 9370 DEERBROOK ST 248.96$
0209341490000 SANTANA, LUCY 9112 LAYTON ST 199.02$
0209361050000 VARGAS, GRISELDA 9155 JADEITE AVE 446.62$
0209361260000 RAMOS, GEORGE L 9656 CAMERON ST 466.58$
0209431030000 PARKER, KELLY J 10138 CONCORD DR 199.02$
0209431070000 NGUYEN, PHU 8676 ANDOVER PL 375.48$
0209441150000 DE SOTO, JEFF 10248 SAN NICHOLAS CT 228.00$
0209442580000 GONZALEZ, JON 8654 SAN MIGUEL PL 315.84$
0209451480000 CRAWFORD, CARMEN L 9163 W RANCHO PARK CIR 199.02$
0209452080000 SALAS, CLAUDIA GABRIELA 9115 E RANCHO PARK CIR 370.32$
0209452250000 PERRY, LEROY JR 9255 RANCHO PARK PL 185.82$
0209553490000 SEE, WAN RU 8662 HARVEST PL 480.84$
0209554230000 ZHANG, CHI FAMILY TRUST 9/22/14 8570 HARVEST PL 236.10$
0209556080000 AUSTIN, FERNANDO 10385 PLUMERIA CT 466.20$
0209556380000 NARVARTE, EDUARDO DAVID 10324 SICILIAN DR 314.97$
0209556520000 CHUANG, SHU HUI 10357 PLUMERIA CT 280.53$
0210451660000 WONG, RICHARD CHEUNG‐MING 9621 SPRINGBROOK DR 199.02$
0210451770000 ABON, JOHN REMI 9525 SPRINGBROOK CT 336.10$
0210471240000 LU, JUIN 9406 GLENAIRE CT 370.32$
0210471470000 FENG, XIAOFEN 9457 SHADOWGROVE DR 575.58$
0210472190000 HSIEH, ROBERT 9394 LIVE OAK DR 199.02$
0210481370000 ORIGEL, LUIS D 9517 CEDAR GLEN CT 370.32$
0210512050000 WANG, JAMES 9451 CEDAR GLEN CT 358.86$
0210561110000 CHIN, SHING 9367 WINDWOOD PL 199.02$
0210641500000 LI, ZHIPENG 9380 BISTRO PL 277.40$
0210641520000 DONG & XU FAMILY TRUST 2/22/16 9360 BISTRO PL 480.84$
0210641550000 BIN, TAO 9330 BISTRO PL 480.84$
0210644170000 XIA, MING 9626 SEASONS DR 196.26$
0210671080000 DAI, FANG 11026 GETAWAY DR 315.06$
0210671180000 LIU, YUMENG 9556 BLUEWATER PL 208.64$
0210671220000 GRACE PROPERTY LLC 11055 GLASS DR 426.52$
0210671350000 WEI, HSIU‐FENG 9560 HAMMOCK PL 327.95$
0210691030000 CLARK, GARY M 9362 SOLAIRE PL 465.69$
0210702160000 LEI, KATRINA 11027 SERENITY DR 259.04$
0225022070000 KHORRAMIAN ENTERPRISES INC 13575 BRITTLE BRUSH CT 234.64$
0225022130000 LONG, TAO 13532 WILD MAPLE CT 199.02$
0225032070000 BAHAM, MICHELE 13532 GYPSUM DR 324.26$
0225122510000 HALL, PRICE W 6061 SUMMIT LN 218.76$
0225122810000 GORMAN, JULIA A 13053 23RD ST 575.58$
0225212180000 LIU, LEI 11387 MOUNT JOHNSON CT 425.58$
0225221090000 TIBBETTS, JASON 11564 MAMMOTH PEAK CT 199.02$
0225231090000 CHAVEZ, MARCO A 11310 MOUNT WALLACE CT 204.98$
0225231440000 TUNDIDOR, MARLA M 11362 PYRAMID PEAK CT 420.84$
0225241130000 FRITZ, MARK A 11622 MOUNT RAINIER CT 425.58$
0225241200000 ARAUJO, MICHAEL T 11639 MOUNT RAINIER CT 575.58$
0225241260000 FEWER FAMILY TRUST 5‐9‐96 11599 MOUNT RAINIER CT 345.58$
0225251310000 RADCLIFFE, JADEN M 11456 TIOGA PEAK CT 351.28$
Page 7 Page 80
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0225251370000 STARKEY, GERALD A 6406 EAGLE PEAK PL 580.84$
0225252060000 EDWARDS TRUST 2/6/02 11470 PIKES PEAK CT 220.32$
0225252200000 BORDATO, MARC 11463 PIKES PEAK CT 199.02$
0225261240000 DOMINGUEZ, JENNIFER L 11593 SANTIAGO PEAK CT 257.04$
0225261490000 ABRAIRA, JOSE 11542 MOUNT BALDWIN CT 373.38$
0225261570000 RANSOM, DON & PATRICIA REV LIV TR 11 11606 MOUNT HOOD CT 214.58$
0225261820000 BRAME, CHARLES 11570 MOUNT HOOD CT 368.70$
0225271060000 RODRIGUEZ, FRANKLIN 11473 MOUNT RITTER ST 207.04$
0225271320000 LIANG, CHANG‐PIN BRIAN 11424 MOUNT RITTER ST 181.61$
0225281210000 MARTINEZ, DAVID M 6430 MOUNT RUSHMORE PL 480.84$
0225301250000 CASTILLO FAMILY TRUST 5/19/17 11754 MOUNT WILSON CT 315.06$
0225301440000 SOKOLOWSKI, JOHN S 11859 MOUNT WILSON CT 191.98$
0225301800000 CHANTRY, ROBERT D 11709 MOUNT GUNNISON CT 198.52$
0225311210000 ZHU, ZHU 11713 MOUNT STERLING CT 386.01$
0225312220000 DIAZGRANADOS, VERONICA REV LIFETIME 11825 MOUNT ROYAL CT 465.06$
0225321080000 PHILLIPS, DARRYL 6429 CALICO PEAK PL 575.58$
0225321140000 CORREA, EVERARDO 6450 PANORAMA CT 199.02$
0225321440000 RIVAS, SILVIA B 11872 ANTLER PEAK CT 270.70$
0225391010000 GREATHOUSE, TRACIE 6116 ROBERTS PL 480.84$
0225391210000 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (TR)12979 BANYAN ST 643.62$
0225391220000 HEARD, STEPHEN 12968 SHASTA DR 216.78$
0225411040000 EATMON, GODFREY C III 12489 RODEO DR 289.30$
0225411090000 RUSSO LIVING TRUST 11/25/19 6338 SHOW HORSE WAY 575.58$
0225421060000 RICO, MICHELLE MARIE 6288 GOLDEN TRAILS AVE 245.21$
0225421270000 FAVELA, OSCAR A 12438 HIGH HORSE DR 215.20$
0225431020000 LIN, GARY & ANNE LIVING TRUST 9/18 12418 HIGH HORSE DR 480.84$
0225431240000 AHN FAMILY TRUST 6‐12‐07 12408 KENTUCKY DERBY CT 182.12$
0225452010000 WU, LIZHI 6302 CARNABY CT 398.93$
0225452090000 LI, KAILUN 6306 BASTILLE CT 199.02$
0225501240000 GUO, JING JING 11969 TIMBER MOUNTAIN CT 199.02$
0225501250000 SHEN, BEINI 11970 PINE MOUNTAIN CT 310.38$
0225511010000 WANG, YAO HSIN 5930 ETIWANDA AVE 463.42$
0225601220000 RIOS, BRENDA C 6272 LAUREL BLOSSOM PL 575.58$
0225611400000 CHIN, ANHUA & WANWAN HSU LIVING TR 12860 VINTAGE DR 231.38$
0225631160000 BRADLE L/T 10/15/90 12212 CLYDESDALE DR 293.69$
0225631620000 LIU, HE 12188 IRONSTONE DR 257.04$
0225652060000 SUN, QINGQUAN 12436 SPLIT REIN DR 199.02$
0225653140000 HPA BORROWER 2016‐2 LLC 5846 GREYVILLE PL 480.84$
0225662030000 ENRIQUEZ, GUY R 5727 STEEPLECHASE CT 199.02$
0225701500000 BARRICMAN, CRAIG 12269 BLUE SPRUCE DR 199.02$
0225701530000 MONTOYA, DANIEL 6145 CEDAR HILL PL 199.02$
0225721370000 WANG, LI HUA 12171 SPLIT REIN DR 257.04$
0225721460000 RAY, JOSEPH 12283 SPLIT REIN DR 215.06$
0225721500000 GONG, LI 12248 SPLIT REIN DR 480.84$
0225731360000 BOYLE, MIKE 12212 BLACKSTONE DR 215.20$
0225751010000 KAUSER, FAZAL 6232 TAYLOR CANYON PL 504.92$
0225771160000 ZHU, SHOU QIANG 6178 RIVER BIRCH PL 199.02$
0225781110000 VELASQUEZ, ROBERT C 6225 CARROTWOOD CT 215.20$
0225791030000 LIU, RUI 6257 SHORE PINE CT 480.84$
0225791070000 AHMED, NASIM 6240 SHORE PINE CT 394.66$
0225791120000 OLIDEN, FELIPE JR 13117 BLUE GUM DR 199.02$
0225841060000 REJ FAMILY TRUST 10/8/12 12746 NORTH BEND CT 200.78$
0225841100000 COSTRUBA, PETER II TRUST 12686 NORTH BEND CT 480.84$
0225851080000 MOORE, BRYANT 12529 CHURCHILL DR 480.84$
0226202490000 JONES, REGINALD L 5658 CAPELLA PL 212.14$
0226211510000 CIRILLO, JOSEPH NICHOLAS 5348 HACIENDA CT 289.40$
Page 8 Page 81
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0226221090000 WOOD, ROBERT & BETTY FAM TR 9‐22‐99 13971 ANNANDALE LN 218.76$
0226231560000 MEDEL, JULIO 14059 HASTINGS RANCH LN 315.02$
0226231580000 LI, GUANLIN 14072 HASTINGS RANCH LN 480.84$
0226241250000 YANG, YONGBO 5683 ALHAMBRA CT 505.11$
0226261120000 SERNA, JOSHUA D 14046 CLAREMONT LN 199.02$
0226261560000 USITA, VILLAMOR R 14065 CRESTLINE PL 480.84$
0226291420000 GUTIERREZ, EDUARDO J 5742 JOHNSTON PL 199.02$
0226432240000 DE SILVA, JOSEPH 13861 LAUREL TREE DR 670.32$
0226432480000 AMODEI, EDWARD M 5822 GREEN PINE CT 257.04$
0226432560000 CASTANEDA, ADAM 5823 GREEN PINE CT 425.58$
0226502120000 LIN, YUEH FANG 13859 DOVE CANYON WAY 199.02$
0226502240000 DAVILA, SAMUEL 6152 GROVEWOOD PL 280.84$
0226502480000 DE LA TORRE, RIGOBERTO 6116 WEEPING WILLOW CT 199.02$
0226512640000 YU, DONG 13761 DARKWOOD WAY 1,103.15$
0226512670000 XU, FENG 13750 DARKWOOD WAY 206.76$
0226523130000 EDWARDS, BRANDON E 13805 SOLEDAD WAY 206.76$
0226532150000 LO, WEI‐AN 13731 SANTA LUCIA CT 201.00$
0226532180000 WANG, KAI 13760 SANTA MARIA DR 480.84$
0226631230000 CUEVAS, BELINDA T 5131 BIANE CT 480.84$
0226651170000 GILMARTIN, JOSEPH 5215 GALLO CT 600.03$
0226661220000 14024 REGINDA DR INC 14024 REGINA DR 245.84$
0226671380000 Z & F INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 5004 CERVETTI AVE 480.84$
0226681070000 COOK, ROBERT 4990 PADRE AVE 266.80$
0227012030000 KHAN, ANUM ALAM 7135 GREEN GLEN CT 311.32$
0227012050000 ZHOU, LINGYUN 7119 GREEN GLEN CT 480.84$
0227012100000 RIVAS, ROBERTO M 7152 GREEN GLEN CT 201.04$
0227012260000 KUNG, VIVIEN 13209 LIMA DR 415.58$
0227061760000 ZADINA, BRENT ANTHONY 13132 VICTORIA ST 315.06$
0227192130000 WANG, AIFANG 13443 WINDY GROVE DR 370.32$
0227192160000 HORN, TYRONE R 13473 WINDY GROVE DR 575.58$
0227193170000 GORAN, MARILYN REVOCABLE TRUST 9/17/ 13509 WILLIAMSON RD 480.84$
0227244200000 MERLOS, JORGE L 13265 CATALPA ST 575.58$
0227253060000 CHEN, ZHENGRONG 13067 LARRERA ST 575.58$
0227256040000 LINE, BRANDON P 13091 VISTA ST 575.58$
0227259090000 TEJAS, LEORA S 13060 PINON ST 257.04$
0227259110000 MOLLINEDO, WALTER OSWALDO JR 13040 PINON ST 199.02$
0227472090000 TANG FAMILY A+ HOLDINGS LLC 6513 DICARLO PL 624.54$
0227504020000 SACKLEY, STUART 12932 CARNESI DR 529.80$
0227582570000 BARREIRO, GEORGE L 7161 EAST AVE 466.20$
0227583040000 BLOSSOM PROPERTY GROUP LLC 7161 EAST AVE 252.04$
0227583180000 7161 East Ave Trust 01072011 7161 EAST AVE 466.20$
0227583270000 HARDY, BONNIE S REV TR 4/03/97 7161 EAST AVE 252.04$
0227693070000 ZHAO, PING 7212 FORESTER PL 425.58$
0227693340000 ZHU, XIAOYI 7123 PASTURE CT 575.58$
0227732010000 RADFORD, ROBERT OWEN 13606 JEREMY CT 199.02$
0227821250000 ANTONUCCI, JIMMY B 6550 EGGLESTONE PL 480.84$
0227821370000 FERREIRA, JOSE A 13348 WHITESTONE PL 414.72$
0227821380000 BUSH, PENELOPE 6538 BROWNSTONE PL 480.84$
0227821410000 LIU, FUQIANG 6572 BROWNSTONE PL 480.84$
0227821450000 FERRARA, ALVIN 6559 BROWNSTONE PL 289.40$
0229151110000 NORIEGA, MIGUEL 8692 PECAN AVE 199.02$
0229171190000 HONEYCUTT, JOHN 13143 ARROW RTE 199.02$
0229171200000 GOMEZ, FRANCISCO JAVIER 13131 ARROW RTE 257.04$
0229301030000 HORTON, JOHN 13080 VINE ST 349.34$
0229301100000 RAMIREZ, MARCOS 13014 VINE ST 204.54$
0229302110000 MILIAN, ANTHONY 13060 CHESTNUT AVE 480.84$
Page 9 Page 82
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0229305050000 SIMMONS, TAVO DEON 8245 CORNWALL AVE 257.04$
0229305190000 SALAS, ESTEVAN 8131 CORNWALL AVE 512.56$
0229311060000 KENDALL‐GORE, THELMA 12958 CHESTNUT AVE 199.02$
0229312050000 HERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO J 8226 MORTON AVE 199.02$
0229313160000 ROBILLARD, MILDRED 8256 EMMETT AVE 257.04$
0229451090000 SINGH, KULWINDER 8408 PECAN AVE 257.04$
0229451180000 WANG, HAO 8478 BULLHEAD CT 304.73$
0229461140000 ALLA, NAGA R 13148 CHATHAM DR 347.97$
0229461390000 SHEN, XIAOYAN 13186 FLAGSTAFF DR 480.84$
0229461570000 HOU, HUA 13171 JOLIET DR 370.32$
0229461580000 WANG, HONGBIN 13181 JOLIET DR 199.02$
0229471060000 DING, WEIYING 13153 CHATHAM DR 251.52$
0229471380000 FAN, JINGJIE 8492 KINGMAN CT 444.28$
0229471540000 FENG, FRANK 13213 CHATHAM DR 246.79$
0229481100000 TJANDRA, HENNY 8228 PECAN AVE 196.62$
0229482060000 ZHAO, WENHAO 13176 OATMAN DR 480.84$
0229482110000 GLORY INVESTMENT LLC 13246 OATMAN DR 495.41$
0229482190000 TIAN, TONGGANG 13173 STANTON DR 229.96$
0229482210000 YANG, ZHIJAN 13153 STANTON DR 480.84$
0229482410000 HU, HAIBO 13205 WINSLOW DR 480.84$
0229482440000 TENG, XIAOCHUAN 13175 WINSLOW DR 370.32$
1043121230000 MC GUIRK, PAUL R LIVING TRUST 7‐10‐9 8069 JENNET ST 199.02$
1043121320000 GREY, SHELLEY 5700 FOX CT 370.32$
1043144020000 VAZQUEZ, JOSE L 8100 SUNFLOWER AVE 223.56$
1043411210000 GARCIA, LORENA 6188 INDIGO AVE 218.46$
1061071050000 BALLAY, GWENDOLYN HEATHER 5297 DELLA AVE 279.80$
1061071060000 RIZVI, RAZA 5285 DELLA AVE 480.84$
1061111210000 ALONSO, JOSE 5320 CAROL AVE 416.20$
1061121130000 ZHENG, DONG 8156 HILLSIDE RD 536.02$
1061121200000 GARDNER, MATTHEW P 8150 VINMAR CT 480.84$
1061141310000 BERGREEN, KATHERINE SUSAN FAM TR 2/2 5392 VIA SERENA 207.38$
1061172100000 HERNANDEZ, ROBERT 8348 ALMOND ST 561.36$
1061201280000 PERFECTO, MANUEL 8361 LA COLINA DR 263.60$
1061201330000 BANACKY, MONICA C 5070 VIA SERENA 512.40$
1061231010000 KAPCHINSKY REVOCABLE LIV TR 3/5314 CARNELIAN ST 199.02$
1061251180000 JIANG, JIAN 8771 VIA EL DORADO 425.58$
1061291010000 SHAMUILIAN, ED 5022 GATEWAY RD 480.84$
1061331100000 SORIANO, CHRISTINA 8954 CABALLERO DR 207.38$
1061331210000 EVENRUD, DAVID O 9013 CABALLERO DR 190.50$
1061341230000 MIHALEY, SHAWN 8990 CITATION CT 208.38$
1061361090000 DIAZ, IRVING F 9071 CAMELLIA CT 273.76$
1061361190000 SPARN, SHARI MARIE 8960 CAMELLIA CT 529.80$
1061361360000 BODNAR, JONATHAN A 8926 HILLSIDE RD 422.46$
1061401200000 SMITH, LOIS 9463 SHERWOOD DR 394.86$
1061551070000 ZHAO, BAOMIN 5316 TOLSTOY RANCH RD 425.58$
1061561290000 JAWS TRUST 05/14/18 5416 TRABUCO CT 276.82$
1061621270000 ENGEL, TODD P 5513 EASTWOOD AVE 199.02$
1061691120000 GUZMAN, LEONARDO J 5675 SAPPHIRE ST 280.84$
1061701230000 GREEN, WILLIAM PATRICK SR 8342 ORCHARD ST 215.20$
1061771080000 ARAGON, THOMAS JR 9138 HIDDEN FARM RD 199.02$
1061771130000 LOPEZ, BEATRICE V ‐ EST OF 9139 ALMOND ST 196.06$
1061791220000 BEDI, BOBBY & LEENA LIV TR 7/19/06 5024 CASTLE CT 210.64$
1061801130000 FLORES, JOSUE 4974 LAREDO PL 394.66$
1061811130000 MARSTON FAMILY TRUST 1/31/13 9084 LARAMIE DR 207.38$
1062101340000 NIELSEN, EDDY B 5846 HILLSIDE COVE 201.00$
1062131140000 AZBEN LIMITED LLC 5828 MOONSTONE AVE 342.69$
Page 10 Page 83
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1062171120000 DORN, LARRY D 8132 ROSEBUD ST 270.68$
1062181050000 STICKEL, DERICK 8359 PUMALO ST 215.20$
1062241280000 TORRES, RANDY 6047 KLUSMAN AVE 207.38$
1062281270000 GU, JINCAI 6087 VINEYARD AVE 480.84$
1062291150000 YEE, WAYNE S 6038 MOONSTONE AVE 480.84$
1062321380000 HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER J 6057 CAROL AVE 199.02$
1062351020000 FEARS, LEON 6177 JASPER ST 232.54$
1062351430000 SCHOOLING, WILLIAM D 6164 AMBERWOOD DR 463.44$
1062401400000 VIEIRA, LUANN J 6157 AMETHYST AVE 187.08$
1062411150000 EASLEY, LONDON B 9516 LEMON AVE 199.02$
1062421150000 COUNTS, ALVIN C 6220 KIRKWOOD AVE 210.32$
1062431160000 MAC DONALD, ANN 6278 QUARTZ AVE 199.02$
1062431290000 PONCE, JESS JR 6258 HELLMAN AVE 218.76$
1062461250000 CROCKER, JUSTIN J L 6280 NAPA AVE 199.02$
1062481150000 LEDDY, DUSTIN 6173 PERIDOT AVE 361.24$
1062501410000 KHATCHADOURIAN, ALEXANDER 6321 VIA SERENA 215.06$
1062521280000 ANDERSON, DAVID B 6325 SACRAMENTO AVE 199.02$
1062531140000 MAGDALENO, LUIS 9087 ORANGE ST 199.02$
1062561500000 MANG, YI 9522 ORANGE ST 257.04$
1062571480000 QUALLS, ROBY LEE & EUNICE 2006 TRUST 9624 HIGHLAND AVE 294.66$
1062581140000 CETINA, MARIO A 9381 SOMERSET DR 375.58$
1062581160000 RAMOS, MARCOS A 9394 SOMERSET DR 199.02$
1062591270000 GUZMAN, ISMAEL 6455 BIRCHWOOD CIR 199.02$
1062591290000 COOK‐HUEBBE, KATHLEEN ELLYN 6460 BIRCHWOOD CIR 202.04$
1062601270000 TORNERO, LOUIE 6453 ZIRCON AVE 199.02$
1062611310000 FEER, JEANNINE 6433 SUNSTONE AVE 199.02$
1062611550000 GARCIA, JOSE C III 8755 ALTA LOMA DR 284.26$
1062631130000 LORITA, RUBEN C 8429 ORANGE ST 575.58$
1062631200000 CABRERA, TONY T 6436 JASPER ST 196.26$
1062631610000 YAZOURI, JAMAL AHMAD 6487 CITRINE ST 475.58$
1062641280000 RUIZ, MARIA A 6421 CAROL AVE 223.56$
1062641290000 MARRIS, ROSE A 6415 CAROL AVE 215.20$
1062641470000 BISHOP FAMILY TRUST 3‐26‐05 8289 ALTA LOMA DR 480.84$
1074051200000 PEREZ, JON GREGORY DOMINGO 5158 HERMOSA AVE 202.28$
1074091150000 DECARVALHO, MICHAEL 10140 SNOWBIRD DR 204.54$
1074151070000 CONVERSE, BRENT 9853 CINCH RING LN 223.56$
1074151100000 GHAHREMANI‐GHAJ, MEHRDAD 9866 CINCH RING LN 384.13$
1074151140000 FRANCO, MARIA 9800 CINCH RING LN 315.88$
1074171140000 STAUFFER, DONALD J 9775 PEACH TREE LN 372.68$
1074211010000 KOLTONIUK, NANCY 10015 HILLSIDE RD 519.00$
1074251120000 MAO, BINGHAI 10207 MONACO DR 302.89$
1074251310000 GARTHWAITE FAMILY TRUST 1/31/0 5560 CARDINAL PL 370.32$
1074301090000 LIN, YNG YUAN 5622 CARTILLA AVE 199.02$
1074301260000 SHEN, JIANPING 10363 POPLAR ST 441.53$
1074361210000 CAMPA, TOMAS 10652 RIDGE CANYON RD 214.93$
1074371070000 KELSO, THOMAS R 5546 DEER CREEK LN 199.02$
1074421040000 BENNETT, TRACY T 10762 WILSON AVE 215.20$
1074431230000 CLEVELAND, DARLA 5501 CANISTEL AVE 340.65$
1074481190000 CHAVEZ, ROBERT D 10811 BOULDER CANYON RD 368.70$
1074491090000 E M O & R WESTERN GENERAL FINA 10919 BOULDER CANYON RD 480.84$
1074511270000 HAO, WEI 4928 SUNDOWNER CT 480.84$
1074521170000 BHATIA, SATDEEP S 5122 EQUINE PL 199.02$
1074531070000 SUNRAY TRUST 12/22/10 10817 CARRIAGE DR 533.38$
1074551150000 SAMEH , ROKES 10973 STALLION WAY 257.04$
1074561040000 AUSTIN, DENETTE REVOCABLE LIVING TRU 10923 CARRIAGE DR 234.03$
1074561130000 LIVERY LEASING INC 11065 RANCH DR 480.84$
Page 11 Page 84
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1074571250000 MCCAW, DAVID ANTHONY 5607 HIGH MEADOW PL 190.00$
1074621300000 BOWENS, TRACI 11090 HIDDEN TRAIL DR 480.84$
1076031400000 LOUIS, KENNETH R 6862 SHADOW RIDGE PL 425.58$
1076031450000 THOMAS, ROGER 6839 WOODCREST PL 274.40$
1076032530000 SANTOS, LYDIA T 9737 WILLOW WOOD DR 480.84$
1076032610000 MILLER, GEORGIANNE I 9743 SHADED WOOD CT 480.84$
1076041430000 QUINTANA, RONALD B 6775 PASITO AVE 215.20$
1076042160000 9816 HOLLY STREET TR 2/27/07 9816 HOLLY ST 257.04$
1076042330000 VOGEL, OSVALDO 9856 AVALON ST 223.56$
1076071040000 BROUGHAM, GERALD R 6753 RAMONA AVE 215.04$
1076071050000 XU, PING 9912 MIGNONETTE ST 480.84$
1076081020000 FENG, XIAOFEN 6808 HERMOSA AVE 412.21$
1076081190000 KEY, JASON 9960 VICTORIA ST 575.58$
1076081220000 MAHMOUDNEJAD, HASTI 6884 TEAK WAY 406.14$
1076081600000 HAO, HUI 10055 GOLDENROD CT 757.14$
1076091520000 HUANG, DONGFANG 6655 MONTRESOR PL 480.84$
1076091580000 CHIU & HU FAMILY TRUST 9/26/13 6662 BRISSAC PL 315.99$
1076101560000 HOOVER, MARSHALL J 6566 KINLOCK AVE 201.27$
1076101580000 MACHUCA, JORGE L 6586 KINLOCK AVE 480.84$
1076111070000 MOORE, RUSSELL L 10142 VICTORIA ST 215.20$
1076151160000 ATTARD, ROBERT P 10442 GALA AVE 199.02$
1076171290000 MULLEN, THOMAS P 6974 LEXINGTON PL 199.02$
1076171350000 TELLO, JUAN C 9832 CHESAPEAKE DR 480.84$
1076173440000 SPARKS, NICHOLE 6959 DOHENY PL 252.04$
1076181080000 NEI, ANTHONY 9863 YALE DR 422.82$
1076181160000 JENNINGS, MONICA L 9815 YALE DR 199.02$
1076182100000 SUN, JUMING 9821 LA VINE CT 450.25$
1076182150000 LI, JUN 9781 LA VINE CT 425.58$
1076182220000 HE, XUEMEI 9727 LA VINE CT 199.02$
1076182240000 CHEN, YINGJIE 9711 LA VINE CT 298.22$
1076182280000 WU, DAN DAN 9738 LA VINE CT 480.84$
1076182360000 CHENG‐ZHENG FAMILY TRUST 9/28/9792 LA VINE CT 480.84$
1076182430000 MARIN, SALVADOR 9860 LA VINE CT 196.26$
1076182440000 FANG, XIANGMING 9882 LA VINE CT 480.84$
1076211300000 PAIGE, JEFF C 10044 MONTE VISTA ST 480.84$
1076221200000 PELFREY, JERRY WAYNE 10075 LA VINE ST 236.10$
1076221300000 2017‐2 IH BORROWER LP 7038 ELMHURST AVE 199.02$
1076221400000 GONZALEZ, LUIS D 7040 CAMBRIDGE AVE 480.84$
1076221640000 ARELLANO, ANNA 7041 RAMONA AVE 480.84$
1076221660000 SANCHEZ, MARCUS JUSTIN 7021 RAMONA AVE 370.32$
1076231200000 RODRIGUEZ, LUIS 10049 LOMITA DR 415.10$
1076231580000 ROBERTSON, DEBORAH A 7125 TEAK WAY 257.04$
1076231720000 WATSON, STEVE 9948 ALBANY AVE 480.84$
1076241320000 HERTEL, ROBERT DALE 9933 CORDON CT 291.36$
1076251090000 CEJA, RUBEN JUAREZ 10195 VICTORIA ST 199.02$
1076251170000 CAMPOS, ARTHUR J 10275 VICTORIA ST 199.02$
1076251370000 RIVERA, NATALIE MIRIAM 6966 FILKINS AVE 292.94$
1076251410000 GUAN, HONGXIANG 6979 FILKINS AVE 189.13$
1076261040000 NELSEN, DARLEEN S REVOCABLE TR 11/8/ 7032 FILKINS AVE 575.58$
1076261350000 WEATHERBEE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE 10236 LA VINE ST 480.84$
1076261410000 2019‐1 IH BORROWER LP 7034 KINLOCK AVE 260.94$
1076291190000 COE, JOYCE 10371 VICTORIA ST 535.05$
1076301070000 ALLEN, STACY 10355 MONTE VISTA ST 199.02$
1076301430000 THORPE SURVIVORS TRUST 7‐12‐91 7043 CENTER AVE 218.76$
1076321080000 DAYAN, ELIRAN 7218 MARINE AVE 402.51$
1076331080000 TEDMORI TRUST 06/16/04 6538 VALINDA AVE 687.37$
Page 12 Page 85
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1076331270000 GONZALEZ, MARIA L 6551 MANGO ST 315.06$
1076351060000 IBARRA, JOSE 6748 DAKOTA AVE 204.76$
1076351180000 T N T TRUST 6733 VALINDA AVE 199.02$
1076351300000 ROBLEDO, RAY E 6748 VALINDA AVE 196.88$
1076351530000 ABENES, OSCAR 6744 MANGO ST 199.02$
1076361230000 SILVIA, CHERI LIVING TRUST 04/08/14 6814 VALINDA AVE 199.02$
1076361410000 HILLSIDE TRUST UDT 7‐13‐99 6805 VALINDA AVE 480.84$
1076381060000 SHEPHERD, JASON H 10750 SONORA AVE 199.02$
1076381650000 ZOHRABI, JORES 6557 SHAWNA AVE 217.74$
1076381670000 RIOFRIR, JESSE 6545 SHAWNA AVE 197.06$
1076401460000 MONSO, IVAN 6655 VENTURA PL 282.98$
1076401830000 CHRISTIANSEN, NELS & ELLEN LIV TR 20 6637 KERN PL 199.02$
1076401840000 MARTINEZ, REGINA 6631 KERN PL 257.04$
1076421190000 CANTARERO, ROBERT 6890 NEVADA CT 480.84$
1076421420000 REUTGEN, JAMES A 6813 MONTEREY PL 289.40$
1076431450000 CARDONA, JORGE B REVOCABLE LIV TR 6974 DAKOTA AVE 368.70$
1076441330000 STANDLEA, STEVEN 7036 VALINDA AVE 225.86$
1076451330000 WOOD, JAMES 6930 MENDOCINO PL 480.84$
1076471380000 ENRIQUEZ, ANTHONY G 7172 TANGERINE PL 199.02$
1076471410000 CHAN, HONG CHING 7165 TANGERINE PL 325.58$
1076471520000 FLEMING, CINDY 10571 DEERFIELD DR 191.36$
1076491220000 XU, CHEN 7224 PARKSIDE PL 199.02$
1076501080000 VICTOR RAY TRUST 5/13/09 11075 KENYON WAY 315.06$
1076501800000 MALONEY, RYAN P 11074 KENYON WAY 480.84$
1076511170000 NUNEZ, JESUS GUILLERMO III 11114 SHAW ST 225.58$
1076511300000 LANE, DYLAN RICHARD 11024 SHAW ST 418.57$
1076511400000 VARELA, EDWARD J 11025 SHAW ST 368.70$
1076512030000 WHITEHEAD, LOU ANN M 6608 SALEM CT 480.84$
1076512350000 BOENDI, MICHAEL A IRREVOC TRUST 3‐27 11110 PACIFIC ST 263.60$
1076512400000 PETTY, JANICE T 11140 PACIFIC ST 217.83$
1076512570000 GOMEZ, CYNTHIA J 6630 CAMROSE PL 479.43$
1076521140000 ZHU, WEI 11017 PACIFIC ST 370.32$
1076521650000 LI, FEIFEI 11078 CHARLESTON ST 480.84$
1076522150000 LIU, LEI 11027 CHARLESTON ST 199.02$
1076531590000 DUNN, STEVE 10708 NORTHVIEW DR 392.40$
1076541440000 WORRELL, JUDY J REV TR (09‐1‐05)6654 CAMROSE PL 480.84$
1076551430000 LECEA, DESIREE 10902 EMERSON ST 207.04$
1076561250000 RUEDA, RICHARD 11269 CORTLAND ST 480.84$
1076561440000 RODRIGUEZ, MIRIAM REVOC TRUST 7/3/07 11269 DRAKE ST 199.02$
1076562270000 DARAKJIAN, RAFFI N 6923 LAMAR CT 480.84$
1076562300000 FLIPPIN, DAVID C 6934 LAMAR CT 201.78$
1076562310000 HENDERSON, YOLANDA R 6940 LAMAR CT 425.58$
1076562590000 MC COY, SHIRLEY E 11178 AMARILLO ST 368.70$
1076562750000 MCCLAY, SONG HYE 11094 PIEDMONT ST 257.04$
1076571430000 NAKANO, JUSTIN I 11106 AMARILLO ST 199.02$
1076571590000 GONZALEZ, OLIVIA 7016 BEAL CT 199.02$
1076581640000 MORALES, OSCAR 7086 WHEATON CT 480.84$
1076611050000 KIM, STEVEN S 10982 SAN MATEO PL 347.14$
1076611120000 RABADI, HAYIL 6547 LOS OSOS WAY 199.02$
1076621040000 DAVIS, BIBIANA 7015 DREW CT 437.40$
1076621190000 DE LA GARZA, ERICKA I 7060 CHICAGO CT 205.20$
1076641340000 ZHU, SHENGXIAN 11231 BROWN DR 251.52$
1076641530000 LIANG, CHUNG‐CHIANG 11253 CLEMSON DR 370.32$
1076641690000 YANG, JUN 6688 VANDERBILT PL 251.52$
1076651060000 JAIN, VINAY 11268 BROWN DR 257.04$
1076652160000 BORDES, JAMES E 11228 WINGATE DR 480.84$
Page 13 Page 86
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1077011140000 SANCHEZ, MARCUS JUSTIN 7377 PASITO AVE 315.06$
1077011430000 HOMESLA LLC 7403 ARCHIBALD AVE 529.80$
1077021610000 MARROQUIN, WILLIAM 7492 RAMONA AVE 480.84$
1077031260000 BERNAL, ALEJANDRO L 10021 PALO ALTO ST 191.52$
1077031920000 ESTRADA, ANTHONY 7475 RAMONA AVE 482.52$
1077051240000 MC MAHAN, MARY LOU 10160 PALO ALTO ST 480.84$
1077061400000 HERRERA, ROBERTO GARCIA 10281 ALDER CT 315.06$
1077061420000 ONEIL, JOEY 10299 ALDER CT 215.20$
1077071160000 TRAVIS, GREGORY D JR 7409 IVY LN 257.04$
1077071230000 JOHNSON, PATRICIA 10339 PEPPER ST 230.84$
1077081190000 ZHOU, XUEXIAN 7468 MESADA ST 470.05$
1077101620000 MONZON, OTTO F JR 7321 GREENHAVEN AVE 199.02$
1077122100000 GARDEA, ROBERT C 7323 CASCADE CT 280.84$
1077141500000 COOPER, FREDRICK 7452 VILLA CREST PL 480.84$
1077141690000 AL‐SP CALIFORNIA LLC 7483 VILLA CREST PL 285.11$
1077141790000 YIN, JIANPING 7485 SIERRA LINDA CT 199.02$
1077141830000 RAMIREZ, RAYMUNDO 7501 SIERRA LINDA CT 230.84$
1077151630000 ROY, JEFFREY S 7485 WALDEN PL 315.06$
1077151780000 WILLISON, JACOB 10716 SUNDANCE DR 370.32$
1077161090000 CHENG, DON 10923 SPYGLASS DR 646.62$
1077162120000 LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC 7454 BUTTERFIELD PL 370.32$
1077162480000 LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC 7419 BUTTERFIELD PL 370.32$
1077162520000 LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC 11012 NESBITT DR 199.02$
1077162560000 PIELMEIER, JOE 11034 NESBITT DR 336.96$
1077181100000 HILL, ERIC A 10571 CREEKBRIDGE ST 199.02$
1077181500000 SRPS LP 7573 PLYMOUTH WAY 199.02$
1077181650000 YAKOVLEV, NATALIA 10643 SPRINGFIELD DR 273.76$
1077251030000 WALKER, RITA M 10451 NUTMEG ST 289.40$
1077251040000 MILLER, VIVIENNE E 10463 NUTMEG ST 324.84$
1077251090000 GOULD, CHARLES 10468 NUTMEG ST 191.00$
1077261030000 TRAUTWEIN, DAVID 7673 CARTILLA AVE 575.58$
1077261240000 REGAN, DERMOT J 7659 CORNEL CT 425.58$
1077281200000 WALLS, FRANK G 7522 LOCKHAVEN AVE 210.40$
1077281700000 UMEMOTO, SUMIYE 10278 CANDLEWOOD ST 370.32$
1077291190000 SIENKNECHT, WALTER F 7506 TEAK WAY 480.84$
1077291660000 MARINO, GORDON RAYMOND II 7533 DARTMOUTH AVE 263.56$
1077301480000 NAEA, TALALELEI JR 7621 TEAK WAY 199.02$
1077301530000 CASTRO, CARLOS 7671 TEAK WAY 351.88$
1077311070000 ELYAZAL, JAMAL 7570 RAMONA AVE 324.89$
1077311120000 RAIDAN, FAYEZ 7527 PASITO AVE 315.06$
1077351240000 HARRIS, GLADYS L TRUST 10/26/04 10054 NORWICK ST 263.56$
1077351310000 FLORES, ALFRED 7801 DARTMOUTH AVE 372.68$
1077361020000 PEREZ, CHRISTOPHER A 9919 HEMLOCK ST 199.02$
1077361040000 HUANG, TINGFANG 9939 HEMLOCK ST 209.40$
1077361700000 COSEY, CHERITA 7773 RAMONA AVE 284.26$
1077371740000 STUMP, GAIL K 10223 HEMLOCK ST 306.18$
1077381180000 MARTINEZ, ARTHUR FAMILY TRUST 4‐26‐0 10139 ASHFORD ST 480.84$
1077381430000 DEHESA, CALVIN J JR 10156 NORWICK ST 258.84$
1077381730000 ZUCKERMAN, JONATHAN 10194 EFFEN ST 275.58$
1077391040000 WILLIAMS, FLOR 7914 MALVERN AVE 198.58$
1077391120000 LYMAN, DAVID A 10249 EFFEN ST 434.26$
1077391160000 VILLALOBOS FAMILY REVOCABLE LI 7914 CENTER AVE 438.04$
1077391440000 GARCIA, REBECCA 10249 DORSET ST 184.26$
1077391810000 CAPPELLA, JOHN & SHARON LIV TR 3/20/ 7994 CENTER AVE 218.76$
1077611410000 GUTIERREZ, ANGELICA 7949 RAMONA AVE 199.02$
1077621070000 BECHTEL, AUSTIN 8007 CAMBRIDGE AVE 199.02$
Page 14 Page 87
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1077641160000 WAGGENER, DONNA SUE 8003 LONDON AVE 480.84$
1077641410000 JSLB RE VENTURES 1 LLC 9855 ESTACIA CT 199.02$
1077672220000 SHU, YU HANG 7337 BELPINE PL 416.20$
1077673090000 SALDANA, ARTHUR 7367 BELPINE PL 202.04$
1077673270000 HUNT, DAVID P 11232 TERRA VISTA PKWY 368.70$
1077673330000 MORAN, ANGELIKA PATRICIA 11220 TERRA VISTA PKWY 413.32$
1077673410000 BENTLEY, KATHLEEN C 11204 TERRA VISTA PKWY 307.56$
1077673680000 HELLER, AMY L 11254 TERRA VISTA PKWY 196.52$
1077673840000 HUEGEL, MERIBETH ‐ EST OF 11278 TERRA VISTA PKWY 368.70$
1077681340000 PIELMEIER, JOE 7396 BELPINE PL 199.02$
1077721080000 RAFFARIN, LINDA 10994 COUNTRYVIEW DR 480.84$
1077741330000 JIMENEZ, YVONNE REVOCABLE TRUST 7645 SANDPIPER CT 199.02$
1077741450000 WILLS, TASHA 7646 SANDPIPER CT 480.84$
1077741540000 CHAVEZ, SUSANA 7621 FAIRHAVEN PL 471.12$
1077742220000 LEON, JASON R 7755 MEADOWCREST CT 324.80$
1077742420000 SETIAWAN, STANLEY JAMES 7734 MONTECITO CT 257.04$
1077751060000 CHAVEZ, ELI 7668 BROADMOOR PL 480.84$
1077751430000 MUNIVE, BLANCA 7662 BARRINGTON CT 480.84$
1077751490000 LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC 7677 GAINEY CT 239.03$
1077761190000 MC CUNE, RUSSELL A 7609 BELPINE PL 370.32$
1077762030000 ENRIQUEZ FAMILY TRUST 5/31/11 11179 ALENCON DR 213.67$
1077762080000 ACOSTA, DARLENE A 11147 ALENCON DR 575.58$
1077762260000 TANG, KEVIN GEE‐KIN 7558 CALAIS CT 199.02$
1077762300000 JURADO, KATHRYN 7521 CALAIS CT 186.27$
1077762310000 BUIGUES, GUSTAVO 7527 CALAIS CT 199.02$
1077762730000 LIVOLSI, LEONARD 11221 ALENCON DR 255.06$
1077822070000 AMAYA, VICTORIA 11237 CORSICA CT 251.10$
1077822080000 USHER, MARION D 11245 CORSICA CT 201.04$
1077822200000 TANG, YUN 11209 AMIATA DR 480.84$
1077822250000 CHOWDHURY & BORA FAMIILY TR 10 11249 AMIATA DR 480.84$
1077831290000 VAN HILL, MICHAEL J 7528 CALAIS CT 199.02$
1077832490000 WANG, HE 11090 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 480.84$
1077832590000 FEI, WANG 11090 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 199.02$
1077832610000 LI, HUI 11090 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 370.32$
1077841320000 MONSIVAIS, LILLIAN R 7802 DANNER CT 257.04$
1077862180000 CHOY, WAI PIK 7732 ASHBURY CT 257.04$
1077862200000 ZHANG, XIANG 7744 ASHBURY CT 480.84$
1077881770000 ARCE, JUAN JOSE ‐ EST OF 10375 CHURCH ST 331.68$
1077913100000 NIE, JING 10581 CANNON DR 376.26$
1077914210000 LI, JINLIN 10572 WILDING DR 288.12$
1077914580000 LI, LIQIN 10548 HUXLEY DR 544.12$
1077915080000 LIGGINS, OTHA DELL SR 10527 HUXLEY DR 257.04$
1077915200000 JARED HUGHES 10561 HUXLEY DR 316.90$
1087091510000 YU, JI QUAN 5091 JUNEAU CT 257.04$
1087101210000 VILLANUEVA, JOSE YNIGO SULLER JR 12215 BISQUE DR 370.32$
1087101320000 LI, YONGZHI 5139 MAGENTA CT 480.84$
1087111110000 ZHAO, JIA 12223 SCARLET WAY 340.84$
1087121040000 ZHANG, QING 12461 MELON DR 480.84$
1087141540000 DENG, MI 12597 DEL REY DR 425.58$
1087141550000 FENG, CHUPING 12607 DEL REY DR 363.06$
1087171220000 MAKA TRUST 12760 BALTIC CT 480.84$
1087201130000 KANG, HUI 5032 WOODLEY RIDGE DR 370.32$
1087201230000 LIU, YUANYUAN 4980 WOODLEY RIDGE DR 282.40$
1087211350000 CLARK, DANIEL T JR 5554 GLEN RIDGE CT 215.20$
1087221270000 LI, ZAIJIN 12221 BLACKSTONE DR 278.28$
1087221440000 JACKSON, CHRASHAWN 12273 RICHFIELD DR 215.06$
Page 15 Page 88
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1087281410000 MOFFETT, KHALIF 5519 PACIFIC CREST PL 197.04$
1087301030000 STRANGIO, JAMES A & CHRISTINA FAMILY 12571 ALTURA DR 199.02$
1087311050000 CARTER LIVING TRUST 07/24/2019 12543 CARMEL KNOLLS DR 215.20$
1087341440000 WRIGHT, TRACY A 5559 CARMELLO CT 425.58$
1087351080000 VERRET, WILLIAM P 12680 ENCINO CT 199.02$
1087351230000 ZZZ GROUP LLC 12655 ENCINO CT 257.04$
1087351430000 YE, WEI 12597 NAPLES WAY 480.84$
1087401200000 HUANG, ZIJING 12221 CASPER CT 284.26$
1087401250000 ZHANG, YU 12161 CASPER CT 480.84$
1087411070000 YUCELEN, MATT Y 12370 ALAMO DR 396.57$
1087411100000 MA, XINGRONG 12420 ALAMO DR 370.32$
1089051060000 NEW CAITLIN LLC 7090 FONTAINE PL 207.72$
1089051260000 SAMI, ABDUL 6947 FONTAINE PL 203.80$
1089061290000 MA, JING 6775 PALO VERDE PL 480.84$
1089071100000 YOUNG FAMILY TRUST 2/2/04 7068 SPENCER CT 480.84$
1089071160000 CARNOCHAN, IAN W 7072 ISLE CT 304.92$
1089081280000 UPADHYAY, HARSHA 12872 FROST BROTHERS CT 199.02$
1089091200000 MONTGOMERY, MICHAEL 12183 HIGHGATE DR 365.58$
1089091220000 CALERO FAMILY TRUST 8/30/2019 12190 STRATFORD DR 199.02$
1089091240000 LARA, DENA 12172 STRATFORD DR 298.96$
1089091270000 GONZALES, LAWRENCE A 6848 COVENTRY CT 199.02$
1089091450000 SAFI, RAED 6864 BIRMINGHAM PL 480.84$
1089091640000 ROSS, JAMES S II 12165 HIGHGATE DR 480.84$
1089092560000 MAYFIELD, LARRY E 12208 STRATFORD DR 427.18$
1089121040000 WILLIAMS, EDITH M 6565 PALO VERDE PL 307.54$
1089141040000 YANG, JINYUAN 6643 FAIRWINDS CT 480.84$
1089141370000 QIN, GUANGFENG 6750 SUMMERSTONE CT 251.52$
1089151170000 NG‐NEWMAN, STEVEN J 11472 FALLINGSTAR CT 575.58$
1089171070000 CRAWFORD, BRIAN RICHARD 6633 MESSINA PL 212.14$
1089171170000 CHANG, HSIU KAI 6592 MESSINA PL 303.83$
1089172020000 CHI, XIAOXIA 11523 GRIMALDI RD 480.84$
1089181030000 JENKINS, MICHAEL PATRICK 6869 FANO CT 215.20$
1089191280000 PANG, XUAN 6774 LANDRIANO PL 480.84$
1089191330000 HORNE, ROBBY C 6795 LANDRIANO PL 535.58$
1089192230000 LEE, MIKYUNG 6879 CASTELLO PL 199.02$
1089193100000 WU, DI 11508 LARK DR 480.84$
1089211280000 LEWIS, RHONDA 11683 PORTOFINO DR 575.58$
1089211480000 THOMPSON, SCOTT 11621 PAVIA DR 199.02$
1089221270000 LU, HSIN‐MING 6980 MARTANO PL 257.04$
1089241460000 ZHANG, RONGHUI 11867 MODENA DR 199.02$
1089251200000 JIAO, JIE 11356 VERONA DR 363.60$
1089252020000 FRANCIS, MARILYN REVOCABLE LIVING TR 11381 GENOVA RD 471.36$
1089252150000 ANNABI, DANIEL M 11344 GENOVA RD 199.02$
1089272060000 ECHEVARRIA, MIGUEL A 11441 LUGANO DR 575.58$
1089272110000 LI, XIAO FENG 11391 LUGANO DR 198.84$
1089272150000 LI, YANYAN 7029 NOVARA PL 199.02$
1089272180000 PURDY, KEVIN M 7059 NOVARA PL 624.54$
1089281290000 LIN FAMILY 2008 TRUST 7061 BARI CT 199.02$
1089282010000 PALMER, GLADYS L REVOC LIV TR 10‐18‐7030 CARINA PL 467.40$
1089282060000 BOKTOR, GEORGE F 7049 CARINA PL 187.80$
1089301160000 ABDELMASIH, JOSEPH 11801 TRAPANI DR 257.04$
1089301380000 ROMNEY, STACEY LIVING TRUST 6/15/15 6960 BELLUNO PL 545.25$
1089301460000 LU, ALBERT 6959 BELLUNO PL 194.40$
1089311030000 MURPHY, JULIE A 11748 MILANO DR 284.54$
1089311310000 LUCAS, RANDY S 11788 FORLI DR 300.85$
1089312290000 LIU, LEI 7069 MARINO PL 496.88$
Page 16 Page 89
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1089313030000 RIZO, JAVIER 7021 PIZZOLI PL 310.38$
1089313070000 CHU, XINCHI 7061 PIZZOLI PL 218.67$
1089321200000 TROTTER, JEREMY 6950 LONDONDERRY CT 199.02$
1089321240000 LIU, GUIKUAN 11926 HUNNICUTT DR 480.84$
1089321560000 SMITH, ROBYN S 6930 HILLHURST CT 199.02$
1089331300000 COOPER, CHRISTOPHER 11911 ARDMOOR CT 468.42$
1089342210000 LIN, NELSON CHIN TIEN 7126 TURNING LEAF PL 480.84$
1089351510000 THACH, MUNG 7132 BRENO PL 336.88$
1089362170000 CHEN, LIANGYAN 7211 VENOSA PL 387.00$
1089372010000 KAKAR, FAHIM R 11591 AMELIA DR 480.84$
1089382080000 SIMON, ROYCE H JR 7159 SCALEA PL 284.58$
1089384200000 STAVROS, SAMUEL M 11782 TRESENDA DR 220.32$
1089384480000 MODEREGER, MICHAEL 11870 MONTELLA DR 452.28$
1089392080000 LI, HUIRAN 7257 TRIVENTO PL 312.30$
1089392220000 QURESHI, ABDUL RASHEED 11791 LARINO DR 315.06$
1089392360000 CHI, ALBERT 7253 COMISO WAY 199.02$
1089401310000 DRYDEN, ERIC REVOCABLE TRUST 3/7/16 6525 MYRTLE CT 370.32$
1089411520000 GEPPERT, ERIC G 12373 HUCKLEBERRY CT 370.32$
1089421260000 EKERMAN, ULUS 12265 MINT CT 257.04$
1089422290000 AGUILAR, RUINGO RUIZ 12320 MINT CT 250.32$
1089431150000 CUBIAS, DORIS 6838 CAROB AVE 199.02$
1089431210000 MURRAY, BUFFY 12268 BELLFLOWER CT 480.84$
1089431220000 WALKER, LORI A 12264 BELLFLOWER CT 370.32$
1089431490000 CARVAJAL, CAROLINA 12321 WINTERGREEN ST 235.06$
1089451050000 MANN, R A & S L CARTER FAM TR 7‐18‐6605 ORCHID CT 305.00$
1089452490000 CAUDILLO 2002 FAMILY TRUST (01 12538 NASTURTIUM DR 331.68$
1089452570000 GARNICA, JUAN 12559 PISTACHE ST 257.04$
1089461020000 VANDERWALL, CHERYL 12487 TAMARISK DR 315.06$
1089461070000 FLORES, MACARIO O 12470 BOUGAINVILLEA WAY 280.74$
1089461320000 RUIZ, ARMANDO 12515 LANTANA DR 218.76$
1089461400000 PRIETO, ALEXANDRO 12524 LANTANA DR 370.32$
1089471060000 BLACK, DOUGLAS 12468 TULIP CT 215.20$
1089481300000 WAFER, LEON L 12768 CARISSA CT 306.18$
1089481450000 ADAMO, PETER J 6607 SEVILLA PL 425.58$
1089481490000 DURAN, MARTIN 6571 ARABIS PL 480.84$
1089481540000 CERVANTES, MISAEL 6554 ARABIS PL 215.06$
1089491040000 KURAMATA, FOSTER L 6615 SEVILLA PL 196.62$
1089501090000 LI, YANLI 6777 SANTOLINA PL 425.58$
1089521010000 MIZER, ETHAN 12406 COLUMBINE WAY 207.60$
1089521650000 OPBROEK, MARY K 12456 BLAZING STAR CT 257.04$
1089531380000 MONTOYA, GILBERT 7094 GERANIUM PL 480.84$
1089532100000 SPALLA, ALEXANDER EDWARD 12409 BLAZING STAR CT 199.02$
1089532190000 TWYMAN, PAULA A 12359 BLAZING STAR CT 204.96$
1089541180000 WANG, YE 12466 WHITBY DR 199.02$
1089541270000 SANQUIST, DONALD G 7163 MARGATE CT 368.70$
1089551040000 GONZALEZ, ANGELA I 12608 ASTER CT 315.06$
1089551110000 DAVIS, BOBBIE JEAN 12575 ASTER CT 480.84$
1089551180000 PERSITZA, STEVEN 12618 BEGONIA CT 251.92$
1089551480000 BANO, SAYYIDA N 6931 TIPU PL 480.84$
1089551630000 YOSS FAMILY TRUST 11/3/15 6996 GOLDENRAIN WAY 545.92$
1089551810000 SEDILLO, DONALD L 12473 VERONICA CT 220.77$
1089561040000 JACKSON, RICHARD STORM 7075 MARIGOLD CT 199.02$
1089561080000 DELEON, LUIS E 12497 IRONBARK DR 183.58$
1089561280000 DRYDEN, ERIC REVOCABLE TR 03/07/16 12432 IRONBARK DR 377.95$
1089601230000 ROGERS, ALLEN 7224 TRAVIS PL 358.34$
1089601420000 JENSEN, ROBERT 7215 TRAVIS PL 204.54$
Page 17 Page 90
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1089601530000 WU, TUNG YI 12748 NICOLET CT 471.93$
1089601570000 MC COY, LEALON 12757 NICOLET CT 575.58$
1089621270000 GUARRACINO, JERRY 12211 AVON CT 480.84$
1089631200000 DHILLON, BRINDERJIT 12167 SAXON DR 575.58$
1089641510000 GOMEZ, ALFRED 7204 SAN CARMELA CT 480.84$
1089651060000 FELLHAUER, ROBERT J REVOCABLE TR 10/ 11920 SAGEMONT DR 315.06$
1089651330000 LI, YING 7153 CUMBERLAND PL 482.52$
1090021220000 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM JEFFREY 7353 W ELLENA 331.68$
1090021230000 ROGERS, DALE JAMES 7353 W ELLENA 196.52$
1090021590000 SCOLLON, JAMES O 7353 W ELLENA 466.20$
1090022200000 APOSTOLOV, IZABELA 7353 W ELLENA 466.20$
1090022650000 EONGRACIA LLC 7353 W ELLENA 216.88$
1090023190000 GIPSON, ROBERT D 7353 W ELLENA 181.00$
1090031030000 GONZALEZ, CANDELARIA 11507 STONECREST DR 270.32$
1090031040000 ROBERTS, MARION 11501 STONECREST DR 331.11$
1090041370000 SHI, WEI 11530 LANCASTER WAY 480.84$
1090051110000 TOY, JAMES 11335 FULBOURN CT 370.32$
1090081170000 QIN, YICHEN 11722 CELEBRATION DR 251.52$
1090082070000 TSE, SIMON 7322 QUINCY PL 199.02$
1090091080000 LIANG, GUIHE 7378 OXFORD PL 199.02$
1090091110000 ANDRADE, LILIA L 7358 OXFORD PL 545.81$
1090101330000 SAIZA, NANCY GONZALES 7411 ETHAN CT 423.40$
1090102280000 CHEUNG, KITTY FAMILY TRUST 5/17/10 11765 ANNAPOLIS DR 425.58$
1090102390000 LORD, MICHAEL E 11718 PARLIAMENT DR 199.02$
1090102610000 WANG, LING 7425 HUTCHINSON PL 199.02$
1090132050000 AHMED, LUBNA S 11846 MANHATTAN CT 480.84$
1090132140000 JOHNSON, REMELL J 11861 MANHATTAN CT 247.86$
1090132320000 PARK, HONG SOO 11873 BUNKER DR 471.33$
1090132340000 GE, HAO 11859 BUNKER DR 203.39$
1090141260000 WU, SAM 7692 WATERBURY PL 199.02$
1090142390000 CHEN, MINQI 7634 CONTINENTAL PL 480.84$
1090151680000 CASTILLO, MONICA C 11518 PALM MEADOWS DR 199.02$
1090151730000 ARANA, MARLON G 11558 PALM MEADOWS DR 251.88$
1090152020000 WANG, MINGXIN 7569 HARDY AVE 452.77$
1090191170000 SAHNI, ANUPAMA TANDON 11450 CHURCH ST 196.52$
1090191210000 ZIOLKOWSKI, CRAIG 11450 CHURCH ST 372.61$
1090191290000 KISCHER, ERIC 11450 CHURCH ST 196.52$
1090191370000 GIVENS, PEGGY A 11450 CHURCH ST 360.44$
1090193220000 YE, XIAOMING 11450 CHURCH ST 415.03$
1090193280000 WU, HAO‐JIH 11450 CHURCH ST 413.32$
1090193590000 PEDERSEN, SHERYL LYNN 11450 CHURCH ST 229.45$
1090222520000 RUIZ, VANESSA 11799 ROCKINGHAM CT 480.84$
1090222550000 GWIZDALA, ROBERT E 11819 ROCKINGHAM CT 480.84$
1090222620000 CHANG, ELLISON 11856 POTOMAC CT 204.54$
1090231040000 ARNECILLO, FIDEL 11725 BUNKER HILL DR 215.06$
1090231060000 MC MILON, AMBER 11737 BUNKER HILL DR 199.02$
1090231470000 SMALEY, MARIZE 11831 POTOMAC CT 480.84$
1090251080000 LEWIS, TERRY L 7320 HENBANE ST 364.80$
1090251090000 CHAVEZ, JEANNETTE C 7310 HENBANE ST 199.02$
1090251260000 PUENTE, GREGORY P 7318 FENNEL RD 257.04$
1090251310000 WANG, QINGLONG 7339 FENNEL RD 412.40$
1090251360000 SANDOVAL, EPIFANIO JR 7389 FENNEL RD 198.32$
1090251400000 THILL, NATHANIEL 7360 HYSSOP DR 319.59$
1090261030000 BLACKMON, DAVID R 11943 PALO ALTO ST 196.10$
1090261240000 DORADO, JOSE D J 7475 HENBANE ST 205.68$
1090271110000 LUO, MENG 11954 FENNEL CT 480.84$
Page 18 Page 91
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1090291080000 BARNICK, JOHN P 11994 ASHFORD ST 480.84$
1090291130000 DELA CRUZ, CEZAR G 12037 HEMLOCK ST 306.78$
1090291200000 NIETO, ANA M 11949 HEMLOCK ST 505.00$
1090291240000 LI, WEN BIN 7776 HENBANE ST 427.18$
1090291590000 WATANAPOL, PHAIBOON J 7759 HYSSOP DR 199.02$
1090301250000 RODRIGUEZ, JEOVANNY R 12011 NORWICK ST 480.84$
1090301490000 BOWLES ENTERPRISES INC 12015 ASHFORD ST 422.82$
1090311030000 PLOSCARIU, DANIEL 12005 STAFFORD ST 480.84$
1090321220000 FONUA, HOKENI S 8016 HENBANE ST 475.58$
1090341230000 LI, MINGZHE 12332 ROYAL OAKS DR 459.45$
1090341320000 WEI, QIANG 12405 ROYAL OAKS DR 202.28$
1090381030000 MONCAYO, JESSE 12868 ELEGANCE DR 575.58$
1090381310000 NICKELSON, DANIEL SCOTT 12893 ELEGANCE DR 215.20$
1090381480000 LOPEZ, ANA 12749 COLONNADE DR 199.02$
1090381680000 AUBRY, CARRIE M 12745 MOSAIC DR 199.02$
1090401430000 JING, MIN 12722 WINE CELLAR CT 432.49$
1090401510000 CHIEN, HSIN‐JEN 12771 WINE CELLAR CT 199.02$
1090401540000 ZHOU, QINGGANG 12806 CRESTFIELD CT 385.70$
1090431020000 MAJADI, A 7539 KENWOOD PL 199.02$
1090431180000 YANG, JUN 7548 KENWOOD PL 480.84$
1090431210000 CHEN, LEI 7531 OAKFORD CT 364.80$
1090431290000 HAYS, CURTIS 7512 OAKFORD CT 425.58$
1090451110000 OCAMPO, CARLOS G 7549 SILVERADO TRAIL PL 480.84$
1090451140000 SALAIS, ROSE E 7575 SILVERADO TRAIL PL 575.58$
1090461400000 BARRIENTOS, HUGO 12195 WATERBROOK DR 199.02$
1090481270000 CRITCHLOW, TYE L 7693 HESS PL 431.04$
1090481300000 SALEH FAMILY TRUST 3/15/18 12208 CHANTRELLE DR 196.52$
1090482330000 WILLMONT LLC 7729 HESS PL 252.04$
1090483010000 XIAO, ZHIGANG 12227 N MAINSTREET 480.84$
1090483330000 AUBERT, MARLO R 12179 N MAINSTREET 196.52$
1090483360000 KHADEMI, GHOLAM H LIVING TR 9/25/00 7752 CHAMBRAY PL 199.02$
1090484330000 ALBORNOZ, MICHAEL A 12180 CHANTRELLE DR 207.27$
1090491100000 ANDERSON, CYNTHIA C 12444 BENTON DR 251.56$
1090491280000 VEGA, SILVIA 12426 CANAL DR 193.88$
1090492470000 RUSICH, STEVEN P 7691 CREOLE PL 307.56$
1090492490000 ARZATE, MICHELLE 7691 CREOLE PL 466.20$
1090493130000 DAI, SHERRIE 12347 HOLLYHOCK DR 466.20$
1090494420000 WANG, JIWEN 12357 HOLLYHOCK DR 185.44$
1090501180000 RAM, KABIR SANDHU 12619 ELK COVE CT 257.04$
1090501530000 SETIAWAN, LINGGAWATI LIVING TRUST 7/ 12600 CHIMNEY ROCK DR 317.82$
1090501690000 LUO, YANRU 7604 DUCK CREEK PL 480.84$
1090512100000 QIU, XINQI 12810 WILD HORSE WAY 199.02$
1090692050000 ZHAO, CHENGJUAN 12230 CHORUS DR 518.60$
1090693840000 OUYANG & CHEN LLC 7457 PALAZZO PL 225.22$
1100011510000 SUN, JING TRUST 2019 12949 COLONIAL DR 575.58$
1100021010000 ACEVEDO, ADRIANA 7491 ETIWANDA AVE 594.66$
1100021240000 GROUP III SGV PROPERTIES LTD 13033 QUAIL CT 426.10$
1100051570000 YU, BIN 7331 SHELBY PL 466.20$
1100051600000 NAVARRO, DANIEL 7331 SHELBY PL 252.04$
1100051670000 OLSON, BRANDON C 7331 SHELBY PL 466.20$
1100052120000 ADAN, MARIZOL FRANCO 7331 SHELBY PL 252.04$
1100052280000 YOUNG, KATHRYN M LIVING TRUST 9/19/1 7331 SHELBY PL 199.16$
1100052340000 QIU, MICHELLE J 7331 SHELBY PL 220.60$
1100061280000 GONZALES, VICKI 13232 WOODCHASE CT 315.06$
1100061480000 GOMEZ, SALVADOR 7446 BUNGALOW WAY 315.06$
1100071120000 JAYAWARDENA, SISIRA LUXMAN 7522 MORNING CREST PL 315.06$
Page 19 Page 92
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1100081240000 TAFOYA, JOSE A L 7620 TUSCANY PL 250.68$
1100131430000 WANG, ZHUIZHOU 12936 CANOPY CT 480.84$
1100141220000 ORTEGA, LEO S 7880 MARGAUX PL 215.20$
1100161010000 ZHANG, YIJIAN 8011 ETIWANDA AVE 480.84$
1100162030000 REFIX CORP 8090 CORNWALL CT 360.44$
1100162130000 TRIVEDI, BANSARI J 8090 CORNWALL CT 385.48$
1100163770000 RIAD, MAMDOUH M 8090 CORNWALL CT 196.52$
1100171340000 ANDERSON, JASON N 13233 LAMBRUSCO CT 466.78$
1100172010000 KABAIAN, ALEXAN 13150 GABAY CT 230.32$
1100172230000 MOORE, GRACIELA 13115 SYLVANER CT 194.66$
1100191350000 REYES, DAVID 13219 GARCIA CT 189.12$
0202161390000 ALTA LOMA CENTER 9612 BASELINE RD 1,205.52$
0202161420000 POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS/L 9696 BASELINE RD 232.78$
0202541620000 CARNELIAN PLAZA LLC 6745 CARNELIAN ST 782.94$
0207241310000 HOUCHIN, ROBERT J 8137 9TH ST 534.14$
0207271860000 RUSICH, FRANK 8782 LANYARD CT 481.96$
0208101200000 SUMMITROSE INVESTMENTS LP 9050 FOOTHILL BLVD 885.97$
0208182020000 FPA WC WOODSONG LP 8255 VINEYARD AVE 1,920.95$
0208261400000 KIM, JAMES 9461 FOOTHILL BLVD 559.80$
0208261550000 PERRY FAMILY TRUST 10/26/06 ‐ EST OF 9455 FOOTHILL BLVD 300.04$
0208353100000 SYB FAMILY TRUST 04/30/91 10709 FOOTHILL BLVD 726.89$
0208622180000 LAUNCHBAUGH FAMILY LIVING TRUS 10759 CIVIC CENTER DR 1,190.20$
0209013680000 ON VINEYARD LLC 8840 FLOWER RD 332.75$
0209032090000 8787‐8801 ONYX LLC 8787 ONYX AVE 588.68$
0209085200000 VDN LP 9997 FERON BLVD 1,659.00$
0209143080000 SCG/DP JERSEY LLC 10801 JERSEY BLVD 481.96$
0209143110000 KARUBIAN, RALPH TRUST (2005)10865 JERSEY BLVD 348.38$
0209171060000 CARRARI, MIGUEL & VICTORIA FAM TR ‐9397 8TH ST 2,570.34$
0209171390000 PRIHISZTAL, EVA 2014 REVOCABLE TR 1‐9353 8TH ST 243.15$
0209411280000 RIF III ‐ EMPIRE LAKES LLC 10860 6TH ST 481.96$
0209411290000 RIF III ‐ EMPIRE LAKES LLC 9220 CLEVELAND AVE 474.16$
0209491300000 SIEGEL FAMILY TRUST 8640 RED OAK ST 361.33$
0210032120000 PROPERTY RESERVE INC 9363 LUCAS RANCH RD 458.39$
0210071350000 SMARTWAY CORPORATION 9621 LUCAS RANCH RD 767.52$
0210071510000 WOO, JACK 9881 6TH ST 931.04$
0229012190000 YNS ENTERPRISE NO 1 LLC 8160 MASI DR 341.00$
0229012350000 YNS ENTERPRISE NO 1 LLC 8200 MASI DR 960.65$
0229012570000 KL RANCHO PROPERTY LLC 8106 MILLIKEN AVE 611.92$
0229022050000 BARAHONA, DENNIS & CHERYL FAMILY LIV 11955 JACK BENNY DR 507.86$
0229031380000 WAL‐MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS 12549 FOOTHILL BLVD 1,805.12$
0229031480000 12649 FOOTHILL BLVD LLC 12649 FOOTHILL BLVD 192.04$
0229121150000 CPRT LAND HOLDING 12167 ARROW RTE 951.05$
0229121460000 FALCON INDUSTRIAL SPE FINANCED 12000 JERSEY CT 639.50$
0229141130000 TOWER OF POWER CORP 8585 ETIWANDA AVE 5,071.82$
0229262120000 LBA/PPF INDUSTRIAL ‐ RCDC LLC 9281 PITTSBURGH AVE 1,113.47$
0229262290000 THOMSON LOGISTICS ASSETS LLC 9000 ROCHESTER AVE 616.28$
0229263070000 DH CHARLES SMITH LLC 9208 CHARLES SMITH AVE 278.94$
0229391040000 DETT PROPERTIES INC 12182 SANTA MARGARITA CT 348.38$
0229401040000 MISSION BUSINESS CENTER LLC 9450 BUFFALO AVE 555.76$
0229411010000 CAL DEVELOPMENT LLC 11530 4TH ST 589.12$
1062111160000 NAVARRO, JOSE RICARDO 5808 HELLMAN AVE 995.15$
1077401490000 DEYI INVESTMENT LLC 10319 DORSET ST 397.73$
1089011060000 CORP PRESIDING BISHOP CHURCH/J 6541 WOODRUFF PL 329.86$
1089131040000 VINEYARDS MARKET LP 11428 KENYON WAY 1,407.67$
1090011010000 LDC CENTRAL PARK PLAZA LLC 7369 MILLIKEN AVE 509.08$
1090541040000 MFREVF III ‐ DAY CREEK LLC 7828 DAY CREEK BLVD 10,208.66$
Page 20 Page 93
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
TOTAL PARCELS: 1,119 TOTAL 404,306.77$
Page 21 Page 94
Delinquent Solid Waste ProtestsMay 18, 2022Date NameAddressReason for ProtestCommercial/Residential Account? Response 5/2/2022 Tower of Power 8585 Etiwanda Debt from June 2018, was from unauthorized order. CommercialLetter attached. Responsible for 2021 debt that was accrued. 5/9/2022 Kavikam, LLC 9491 La Grande Property is vacant. Residential Resolved 5/18/2022, removed from list. 5/16/2022 Andrew Ochoa 8488 Hunter Drive Delinquent amount is for tenant, that refused to pay. ResidentialThe City will provide a response after public hearing. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL - ITEM G1 - MAY 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Public Hearing for Placement of Special
Assessments and Liens for Delinquent
Solid Waste Accounts
May 18, 2022
Mandatory Payment Program
Section 8.17.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code established the requirements for
mandatory payment for residential,commercial
and industrial solid waste collection services.
•The franchised waste hauler provides the City
with a list of delinquent accounts annually.
•City is required to send out public hearing
notices via certified mail at least 10 days prior
to the public hearing.
Public Hearing Notification
•The Public Hearing notices were mailed to all
property owners on the list of delinquent accounts
on April 21, 2022.
•The Public Hearing was also advertised in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 3, 2022.
Delinquent Accounts as of May 17, 2022
•Accrual period: January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021
•1,119 Delinquent Accounts
•Total Delinquent Amount $404,306.77
•Deadline for Franchise Waste Hauler to receive
payment is July 13, 2022
Public Hearing Notice Inquiries as of May 17, 2022
•43 Inquiries
•26 total visits to the Lien Public Hearing info page
posted on City’s website
•Three written protests
Questions?
1
1
2
7
7
DATE: May 18, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City Manager – Community
Development, Interim Planning Director
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Number 2022-055 and Conduct
of First Reading of Ordinance Numbers 1000, 1001, and 1002 to be Read by Title
Only and Waive Further Reading, to Adopt A Comprehensive Revision to Title 17 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, A Revised Zoning Map, Repeal the
Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific
Plan, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community, Town Square
Master Plan, and Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan
Boundary and Rename to The Resort Specific Plan; and Adopt an Addendum to the
General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). (ORDINANCE NO.
1000, 1001, 1002 AND RESOLUTION 2022-055) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution and conduct first
reading of the attached ordinances to:
Adopt an addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) SCH# 2021050261; and
Adopt a comprehensive revision to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to implement the goals
and policies of the recently adopted General Plan, including, but not limited to:
Develop implementing zones for all General Plan land use designations;
Add a new article implementing form-based zoning for specific mixed use zones;
Incorporate key standards from Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the Development Code;
Revise permit procedures to streamline development review;
Comply with State Law; and
Adopt a revised Zoning Map:
Establishes new zoning districts that implement the General Plan land use designations; and
Repeal the following Specific Plans, Master Plans and Planned Communities:
Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community;
Etiwanda North Specific Plan;
Etiwanda Specific Plan;
Terra Vista Planned Community;
Town Square Master Plan;
Page 100
2
1
2
7
7
Victoria Arbors Maser Plan;
Victoria Community Plan; and
Amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan to change the boundary and rename to The Resort Specific Plan;
BACKGROUND:
On December 15, 2021, the City Council unanimously adopted the updated General Plan for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. The General Plan is the City’s blueprint, or constitution, for future development. It
documents the city’s long-range vision and established clear goals, objectives and actions to guide the
community through the next 10 to 20 years of change. The City Council initiated this update process,
referred to as PlanRC, to be compliant with changes in state law and to build on our success as a world
class community to create a balanced, vibrant and innovative city. This comprehensive General Plan
Update addresses issues and challenges facing the City, including diversifying employment opportunities,
expanding housing and mobility choice and preserving the character, history, and quality of life that make
Rancho Cucamonga a special place to live. The updated General Plan will advance the City’s vision for a
sustainable, resilient, equitable and healthy community.
While the General Plan is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and
implementation strategy to support future development in Rancho Cucamonga, the Development Code
implements General Plan policies through detailed development regulations, such as specific use types
and building standards. Although the purpose and intent of zoning is different from the General Plan, state
law requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and
densities/intensities are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation
and the zoning of the property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a general plan
amendment, the city must enact a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time.
The adoption of the General Plan has spurred development interest and is resulting in an increase in
applications for large-scale projects. Currently, there are over 1,700 residential units and approximately
64,000 square feet of commercial development in the pipeline along the major corridors in the southern
portion of the city. The current development code is not consistent with the intent of the character-based
General Plan Land Use Designations and does not contain the necessary standards to implement the
General Plan vision for walkable, mixed-use places. City staff have been working with a consultant team
on amendments to the Development Code to implement the Land Use Designations in the updated General
Plan, including the addition of form-based code components for the new mixed-use place types established
in the General Plan.
ANALYSIS:
The goals of the Development Code update are to codify the community’s vision as established in the
General Plan update process, increase certainty in the development review process, and facilitate
implementation of key General Plan concepts related to land use and urban design. A primary objective is
to integrate form-based regulations in appropriate areas, such as along Foothill Boulevard, to promote
pedestrian activity and transition these areas from auto-oriented to more walkable and urban configurations.
Fundamental elements of the Development Code update are:
A hybrid Development Code that integrates form-based and conventional zones.
New form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use areas along Foothill Boulevard and
other key corridors.
Incorporation of appropriate standards from older Specific Plans and Planned Communities into
the new zoning regulations to allow for repeal of outdated plans.
New objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use development projects.
Revisions to conventional zones as needed to implement the land use vision of the General Plan.
Revised general development standards to address General Plan policy or existing deficiencies
with respect to landscaping, open space, and noise, among others as needed.
Page 101
3
1
2
7
7
Improved administration and permit procedures to streamline development review for projects
consistent with the General Plan and ensure adequate tools for enforcement of the Code.
Compliance with State and Federal law.
Consistency with the updated General Plan.
General Plan Consistency
The existing Development Code was reviewed for consistency with the goals and policies of the adopted
General Plan. Where an inconsistency was identified, the Development Code was amended to provide
adequate provisions to facilitate development in alignment with the policy direction of the General Plan. In
addition, the intent and purpose of each General Plan land use designation was assessed to determine
whether the designation could be implemented with an existing zoning district or if a new zone was needed.
Recommendations to implement the General Plan and the creation of new form-based zones to implement
the new mixed-use land use designations are described below.
Implementation of the General Plan Vision
To successfully achieve the City’s vision and uphold the core values identified by the community during the
PlanRC process, the General Plan is designed around strengthening Rancho Cucamonga’s sense of
identity and character by creating places where people want to be and improving their ability to move
around. The overarching strategy is one of human-scaled design, with buildings and outdoor spaces
oriented towards people connected by safe and comfortable streets, pathways, and trails that provide
equitable access for all. The General Plan organizes the city into districts, centers, corridors, and
neighborhoods, with an overall vision for greater walkability centered around nodes of activity.
Vision Diagram
Page 102
4
1
2
7
7
The Land Use and Community Character Chapter of the General Plan describes and defines the distinct
types of places—or “place types”—that the City aims to create to achieve the vision. The General Plan
unifies the inseparable topics of land use and community character and design into a single chapter to
ensure that the uses, experiences, and activities that current and future community members enjoy in our
city cannot be divorced from our vision for the unique look, feel, character, ambiance and quality of life that
we enjoy in Rancho Cucamonga.
Given the City’s broad place-making goals and the community’s interest in shaping the form and character
of the city, the General Plan uses “place type” designations that go beyond conventional land use
designations to better define the existing and intended character, form, and function of each part of the city.
Each place type is organized into designations that provide direction on the intended range of uses,
appropriate levels of development density and intensity, and intended physical design character. The Land
Plan is illustrated below and also available on the City’s website: https://bit.ly/gplandplan.
Place Types and General Plan Designations
Page 103
5
1
2
7
7
Land Plan
Form-Based Code
The Form-Based Code (FBC) implements the General Plan’s vision, place type designations, and policy
direction for key areas of the city, including the major corridors, focus areas and activity nodes. The FBC,
which is Article VIII of Title 17 (Development Code), establishes place-based standards for certain areas
that are intended to promote pedestrian activity, encourage a diversity of uses, accommodate new housing
typologies, and facilitate the transition of auto-oriented areas to more walkable and urban places. The FBC
represents an alternative to a conventional zoning code’s approach to the way the built environment is
regulated.
The definition of a Form-Based Code is as follows: “Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and
a high-quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing
principle for the code. These codes are adopted into city or county law as regulations, not mere guidelines.
Form-Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.” (Source: Form-Based Codes Institute)
Unlike conventional, use-based codes, FBCs utilize the intended form and character of a neighborhood
rather than use as the organizing framework of the code. FBCs address the relationship between building
facades and the public realm (i.e., sidewalk, street), the form and mass of buildings in relation to one
Page 104
6
1
2
7
7
another, and the scale and types of buildings and blocks.
Regulations and standards in a FBC are presented graphically in diagrams and photographs as well as
supplemental text. These standards are keyed to the zoning map, assigning an appropriate form and scale
through the application of form-based zones to specific lots for key areas of the city where mixed use urban
form is desired. The remainder of the city uses conventional zoning as regulated by Article III of the
Development Code. While the FBC focuses on an intended physical form, it also regulates use by allowing
a mix of appropriate land uses chosen to ensure compatibility among different contexts and the intended
physical form of the area. The FBC is intended to transform our commercial corridors and centers into
vibrant, mixed-use areas where residents can live, work, and play within close walking distance.
Article VIII is organized around the following regulating topic areas:
Zone and Building Standards: establishes purpose and intent of building type standards, standards
that are applicable to all form-based zones and building types, descriptions of each building type,
and objective development standards associated with each building type.
Building Entrances and Facades: establishes purpose and intent of building entrance and facade
type standards, descriptions of each building entrance and facade type, and objective development
standards associated with each type.
Public Open Space: establishes purpose and intent of public open space standards, descriptions of
each public open space type, and objective development standards associated with each type.
Land Use Standards: establishes the land uses allowed in each form-based zone and any
necessary specific use standards.
Large Site Development: provides requirements for large site development including applicability,
intent and design review requirements; and establishes block size and connectivity standards.
Objective Design Standards
Another key component of the updated Development Code is new objective design standards for multi-
family residential and mixed-use development projects to respond to changes in state law and facilitate
housing production. State law defines objective standards as those that “involve no personal or subjective
judgement by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform
benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant and public official prior
to submittal.” They are measurable and verifiable (i.e., no “gray area” for interpretation) to make the design
review process more streamlined, predictable, and easier to interpret.
The purpose of objective design standards is for applicants to know beforehand what requirements apply
to a proposed development and for the applicant to be able to design a project that meets those
requirements before submittal. Objective design standards are written as requirements, rather than
guidelines, and will provide applicants and developers with a clear understanding of the City’s expectations
Page 105
7
1
2
7
7
for mixed-use and multi-family residential project design to help streamline the review process. Objective
design standards that are intended to complement all base zoning districts are contained in Article VII,
while objective standards specifically aimed at mixed use and multi-family development in the form-based
zones are integrated into Article VIII.
Future Repeal of Older Specific Plans, Master Plans and Planned Communities
Part of the Development Code update includes the incorporation of appropriate standards from older
specific plans, master plans and planned communities into the new zoning regulations to allow for the
repeal of outdated plans. In many instances these original plans are fully built out, and in others revisions
to the code will supersede the need for the specialized zoning or standards allowed by the specific plan,
master plan or planned community. Because many of the City’s specific plans, master plans and planned
communities were prepared over 30 years ago, they are difficult to interpret and amendments are often
required to accommodate different types of development not contemplated in the 1980s and 1990s.
The following is the list of specific plans, master plans and planned communities to be repealed with
adoption of the updated Development Code:
Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community (EH) 1988
Etiwanda North Specific Plan (NESP) 1992
Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) 1985
Terra Vista Planned Community (TCVP) 1983
Town Square Master Plan (TS) 2002
Victoria Arbors Master Plan (VA) 2002
Victoria Planned Community (VCP) 1981
Empire Lakes Specific Plan (ELSP) (Also referred to as IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan) 1994 –
Amend to change boundary and renamed to The Resort Specific Plan
In order to maintain compatibility of new infill development and to avoid the creation of non-conforming
uses and structures, applicable standards from these plans have been incorporated into the new form-
based zones and/or integrating into the Development Code through the use of subzones, which are
subsets of the primary conventional zone. Subzones align with the primary zone development standards
and use requirements except where otherwise noted to maintain the necessary standards of the repealed
plan. Because of inconsistencies between the Development Code, the regulations of the repealed plans,
and what is built, the Development Code includes provisions for staff to allow flexibility based on existing
development that may become non-conforming.
Legal Consistency
Legal requirements relative to this code update were analyzed and where the Development Code was
determined to be out of compliance, amendments to the code were made. The following topic areas were
amended to bring the City’s Development Code into compliance with state and federal law:
Special needs housing, including community care facilities, family day care homes, emergency
shelters, farmworker housing
Accessory dwelling units
Manufactured homes
Telecommunications facilities, including review of wireless telecommunications facilities and
acceleration of broadband deployment
Density bonuses, incentives and concessions
Fine-tuning of permit review requirements
General Code Issues
In addition, and as part of the process, the consultant for the Development Code update led a series staff
interviews with representatives from the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Building and
Safety Department, Animal Services and Community Improvement Division to identify opportunities to
clarify code content, address existing deficiencies, or improve usability. The following topics were amended
Page 106
8
1
2
7
7
to address staff identified issues:
Amendments to review applicability and process language for a variety of application types for
clarity.
Changes to home occupancy permits to expressly prohibit certain uses such as ammunition
recycling.
Removal of the planned community process which is not used anymore and changes to specific
plan size threshold.
Modifications to the allowed use table and descriptions for certain allowed uses.
Updates to development standards for residential zones to allow for more residential types to
expand opportunities for a range of residential development.
Removal of several Overlay Zoning Districts that are no longer applicable with the amendments to
the code and the inclusion of the form-based code. The Overlays to be removed include:
Industrial/Commercial, Foothill Boulevard, Mixed Use, and Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning Districts.
Changes to requirements and exceptions for certain accessory structures.
Reductions of guest parking standards for residential uses.
Addition of parking management standards to address spillover parking from large projects into
adjacent residential neighborhoods.
Updates animal keeping standards to make them easier to apply and enforce and to allow for a
wider variety of pets on smaller lot sizes.
Comprehensive update to general design provisions and design provisions by development type.
Revisions to the Zoning Map for consistency with the General Plan and Development Code and to
implement the new Form-Based Zones.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
PlanRC Engagement Process
A primary purpose of the Development Code update is for consistency with, and implementation of, the
recently adopted General Plan, which reflects the vision and core values of the community. The City started
PlanRC, the name for the General Plan Update process, in January 2020. Throughout the nearly two-year
process leading up to General Plan adoption, the City conducted a robust engagement effort with the public.
Community input was solicited and reflected throughout each phase of the planning process. PlanRC
involved longtime residents, new residents, seniors, youth, clubs, organizations, business owners,
developers, and many more. As a city rich in its mix of ethnicities, cultures and identities, the engagement
for PlanRC worked to provide consistent equitable and inclusive community engagement practices
throughout the process.
Although in-person outreach was extremely limited due to COVID-19 constraints, the community adapted
and found meaningful ways to get involved in PlanRC through digital engagement platforms. Engagement
efforts prioritized determining values and ideas for the future of the city related to land use, housing,
mobility, recreation, and economic development. There were several online surveys, events, and
workshops that focused solely on community character, land use, and placemaking, which are
implemented by the zoning and standards in the Development Code. Throughout the two-year process,
PlanRC received input from over 2,300 community members through online surveys and virtual meetings
and generated over 1.1 million digital impressions through various social media platforms. The
Development Code, in particular the Form-Based Code, is one of the implementing tools for the General
Plan vision, and therefore reflects the ideas, values and input of the community.
Development Code Update Focus Group Meeting
In addition to the significant amount of community input received during the PlanRC process, staff also
conducted a virtual Development Code Update Focus Group Discussion on November 3, 2021. This focus
group meeting included Building Industry Association (BIA) members and several developers. The intent
of the meeting was to inform and engage key stakeholders about the Development Code update and collect
feedback on the current code and opportunities for improvement.
Page 107
9
1
2
7
7
Some input received from stakeholders that were addressed in the development code included
suggestions for lower guest parking requirements, allowing for shared parking between uses in mixed use
areas and flexibility in design for accommodating parking as well as recommendations for future
development of parking management plans. In addition, stakeholders requested clear process
requirements and objective standards that provide more certainty in desired outcome and streamlining in
development review, and more flexibility in certain lot and site planning requirements without having to do
a zone change or code amendment.
Planning Commission
On April 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session on the Public Review Draft of the
Development Code and subsequently on April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the proposed amendments. Three minor edits were also presented to the Commission to be
included in the recommendation. These include: 1) removing height limits from the CE2 zone to allow for
flexibility in vertical development; 2) elimination of height limit for high rise building type; and 3) Changing
the zoning on APN 0209-032-35 from Neo Industrial to Center 1. No public comments were received at
either meeting and the Commission unanimously recommended adoption of all proposed amendments.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In approving the General Plan update in December 2021, the City Council certified the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City has
reviewed the proposed Development Code Update against the General Plan EIR and determined the EIR
adequately addresses all the environmental issues associated with the project. The proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts on the environment based upon the analysis and
conclusions presented in the General Plan EIR. In addition, previously identified significant impacts would
not be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. Finally, no new feasible mitigation
measures have been identified that would substantially reduce significant impacts identified in the General
Plan EIR. Therefore, staff has prepared an EIR Addendum for the Development Code Update. Unlike an
EIR, an Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of these new interim standards will facilitate future development consistent with the vision
outlined in the General Plan. The General Plan vision for denser, mixed use urban centers can help
Rancho Cucamonga maintain a high level of fiscal performance and become a regional destination and
focal point of activity.
COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
These amendments address multiple City Council Core Values, including providing and nurturing a high
quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and intentionally
embracing and anticipating the future, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and more.
Furthermore, these ordinances support the City Council’s goal of completing the General Plan and Housing
Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, April 27, 2022
Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14
Attachment 3 – Ordinance No 1000
Attachment 4 – Ordinance No 1001
Attachment 5 – Ordinance No 1002
Attachment 6 – Resolution No 2022-055
Page 108
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission Agenda
April 27, 2022
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
7:00 p.m.
The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on
April 27, 2022. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Boling and
Commissioner Daniels; Commissioner Williams.
Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City
Manager-Community Development, Interim Planning Director; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy
Director of Planning; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner; Vincent
Acuna, Associate Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Darleen Cervera,
Executive Assistant; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chair Dopp opened public communications and hearing no one, closed public communications.
Chair Dopp announced a change in the agenda order: Following Consent Calendar, Public
Hearing Item D2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 - PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS
will be heard before D1. Design Review DRC2021-00120 WDCC MILLIKEN WEST
RESIDENTIAL, LLC.
C. Consent Calendar
C1.Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2022.
Motion to adopt by Commissioner Boiling, second by Commissioner Daniels. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0 vote.
D. Public Hearing
D2. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OF DAYTON DRIVE AND BUFFALO AVENUE –
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 - PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS - A request to
operate an 85,026 square foot Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution (Medium) land use in
the Neo Industrial (NI) District at 11601 Dayton Drive; APN: 0229-262-09. The project
qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – operation,
permitting, leasing, or minor alteration of existing structures.
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and
presentation (copy on file).
Page 109
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 2 of 8
Chair Dopp opened public hearing.
Chuck Buquet, Applicant, thanked Commissioners for their consideration this evening.
Chair Dopp closed public hearing.
Commissioner Boling expressed appreciation for the applicant’s usage of this property that would
otherwise be an underutilized building within the city. It adds or keeps jobs within the city and has the
necessary infrastructure for trucks going in and out. He said staff did their due diligence in determining
the operations would be relative similar in nature.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-13 (CUP DRC2022-00053).
D1. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master
Plan and construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841
square feet of commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District,
APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120,
Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074).
Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation
(copy on file).
Brian Jacobson, Applicant, discussed the intent and envision for the project. Relating to Condition of
Approval, Planning Condition #2, a letter was emailed today requesting it to be significantly revised and
replaced with similar condition applied to the Alta Cuvee project approved at the last Commission meeting
(Letter on file).
Commissioner Daniels asked if they have a phasing plan yet.
Brian Jacobson responded they are still analyzing what will come first.
Commissioner Daniels asked what kind of timeframe is there in first phase/walk ups.
Brian Jacobson answered they hope to start project 1-year from now.
Commissioner Morales asked if they had problems leasing out commercial units to retail tenants at other
projects.
Brian Jacobson responded this is our first project constructed of this type. Have not had anything like this
before. He said they reached out to broker community to find out what are the challenges to get tenants to
commit if they cannot see what they are getting. The condition, as written, it creates timing problems. The
timing problems impact the revenue flow. He said if we were confident, we could get the type of marquee
commercial tenants that we want for this project to build that space and get them in first. That is exactly what
we would do but we really want the best quality commercial tenants possible. Everyone has said you have
to get the project substantially complete before getting a marquee tenant interested to lease.
Commissioner Morales asked about the parking structure. Will it be visible from the street level from cars or
pedestrians on Foothill.
Page 110
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 3 of 8
Brian Jacobson answered when you are directly adjacent driving on Foothill and Milliken the residential public
facing part of the building blocks the structure entirely. Although, if you get far enough down the road, you
can see a portion of the parking structure peeking out above the roof line at the residential building. He said
staff has placed a condition on the project as it proceeds through construction and if there still concerns about
visibility of top of parking structure, staff can ask to screen it through different methods.
Vice Chair Williams mentioned the design of the different floors of the parking garage and asked to explain
how resident would get inside.
Brain Jacobson explained the wrap design benefit gives the ability for someone who has an apartment on
the 3rd floor, they can park on the 3rd floor of the structure with direct access to the third floor of the building.
He said this is designed that every unit will have a least one of their assigned parking spaces on the level
they live on.
Vice Chair Williams asked will there be along Foothill a bus bay and an area where Uber and Lyft people can
wait comfortably where it is safe and well lit.
Brian Jacobson yes, there is a bus bay on Foothill and that will remain. Ultimately down the road, it may
change a little bit, depending on how transit evolves in the city.
Vice Chair Williams asked about bikeability. Is there bike sharing, bike paths.
Brian Jacobson answered they will have a rent a bike program.
Commissioner Boling asked can you explain or reconcile your description of a marquee quality tenant. The
ones shown on the plans, such as a nail salon, do not seem like marquee tenants.
Brian Jacobson replied the purpose of the diagram was to illustrate the allowable uses within the spaces.
Commissioner Boling asked to provide examples or categories of tenants.
Brian Jacobson answered they are not at liberty to say.
Commissioner Boling asked would it be fair to categorize the type of tenant you are seeking be known as a
national or regional brand.
Brian Jacobson responded yes, it would be a fair categorization.
Chair Dopp asked what an acceptable condition is. He said keep in mind we want to make sure all the pieces
are moving together at the same time in terms of the project being successful.
Brian Jacobson replied the condition that was applied to Alta Cuvee would be great.
Commissioner Williams asked what was the Alta Cuvee condition.
Page 111
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 4 of 8
Brian Jacobson read aloud to the greatest extent feasible, the applicant and developer shall lease the two-
ground floor commercial spaces on the project to uses/business that encourage public interaction and
attendance. Uses that encourage public interaction and attendance include but are not limited to cafes,
restaurants, bakeries, sandwich shops, etc. Uses that are limited in their ability to attract the public and
activate the space in front of the building are discouraged. These uses include barber shops, salons, dental
offices, accountants, etc.
Chair Dopp asked if there is consideration to add docking stations for electrical vehicles on the project.
Brian Jacobson answered yes. He said all the enclosed garages are pre-wired for electrical vehicle charging
and garages who have direct access from their unit, they have charging outlets already installed. There will
also be pre-planning electrical vehicles in the parking garage.
Chair Dopp expressed he likes the roof lounge. Asked what kind of experience and deign do they have to
activate that space.
Brian Jacobson mentioned they have not built this type of building before. Their roof decks exist on free
standing club houses where they have 2-story version of club houses. There are decks on the roof of the
ground floor. He said their best example is at the Homecoming at the Resort. It has a 2-story clubhouse
and on 2nd floor has a lounge, sort of gathering, great room experience opens an outdoor deck. That deck
has a view to the south overlooking the pool and north to the mountain.
Chair Dopp opened public hearing.
Noah Garrison, Lozeau Drury, representing Supporters Alliance for Environs Responsibility (“SAFER”),
requested denial of the project, stating It does not meet CEQA requirements. He said it requires proper
EIR due to having significant environmental effect.
Brian Jacobson mentioned they did review the letter received this afternoon by Lozeau Drury. Their attorney
prepared a written response explaining comments are inaccurate.
Chair Dopp closed public hearing.
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained the CEQA process utilized for this project. He also reviewed the
letter by Lozeau Drury, and it did not provide any new substantial evidence that there was a significant impact
that had not been previously analyzed. He is comfortable saying you can move forward tonight.
Chair Dopp asked, is it fair to say just because we do a General Plan EIR means it does not qualify for future
projects.
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, stated if that were the case, CEQA guideline would say that, and it does not
say that. It says we can rely on that prior EIR if the projects densities are consistent with the densities in the
General Plan. If that were the case, the guidelines would be of no use to anyone.
Commissioner Morales asked staff to explain the COA and why it was put in there. How we had problems
in the past with developers finishing the project. Why do you think its important we have a strict COA like
that for such a big project.
Page 112
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 5 of 8
Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager, explained we did have problems with developers finishing in the past.
We can identify a handful of sites within the city. He provided examples; Office and Hotel project on Fourth
and Haven that has a pad for retail building. Hotel has been built for years with no activity on the pad area.
D.R. Horton site Baseline/Day Creek had similar conditions for that project. We did run up against a situation
where D.R. Horton did not want to move forward with the non-residential component. Due to Covid, we had
to make adjustments to the conditions to help push forward.
Commissioner Boling asked to clarify is the concern that the retail components won’t be built within a timely
manner or is it occupied and therefore sales tax revenue starts coming off of it.
Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager, replied it’s a two-stage concern. Certainly, we want to see it get built.
Ideally get built and get a tenant.
Commissioner Boling asked what staff’s true concern is. In his mind, the core issue is what incentive is there
to assure the retail component gets built and once it gets built how do we help the developer get marquee
quality tenants.
Chair Dopp stated we are new to mixed-use. What are we seeing in other cities in terms of the timeline. He
asked are retail lacking far behind.
Matthew Burris stated the retail market is complicated post Covid. Rancho Cucamonga tends to have a very,
very healthy retail market. Far more in our retail city than most comparable cities. Yes, there is a demand,
no doubt to fill space.
Chair Dopp asked is it staffs position not necessary sacrificing quality if we keep this condition in place.
Matthew Burris answered yes, that would be our position on the condition. It is a legitimate concern,
Vice Chair Williams stated if we require them to get basic space ready for a tenant but if you force them
before they take occupancy, they will get whatever they can get. There is no question, they will fill. She said
we want as high quality as we can get. Does not think we need to require them to have tenants in place
before they take occupancy.
Commissioner Morales mentioned near downtown L.A. on Broadway, there are mixed-use buildings and
most of those buildings are commercial units on bottom are empty. There are metal frames, looks ugly. Is
that something that could potentially happen with this project. Infrastructure exposed.
Matthew Burris replied yes. It is a concern that led to the writing of the language in the condition presented
this evening.
Commissioner Daniels stated he agrees with the developer. He also understands Morales’ comments. It
seems more of that wrap building getting built it is going to occur with that retail there. He said he will not
have difficulty changing that modification.
Matthew Burris mentioned one of the things that came out of the General Plan project is that Milliken is
designed as an arterial. In that case to have retail on a fast street, we felt a lot more comfortable to have
retail on Foothill be more comfortable and have support retail.
Commissioner Morales stated the applicant had good points on Condition #2 and the City had good points
of concern. Is there any kind of compromise.
Page 113
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 6 of 8
Nicholas Ghirelli suggested the following alternative language for the condition: Occupancy for the walk-up
product shall be limited to 65 percent (212 units) until a building permit is obtained by the developer and
construction has commenced on the wrap building. Subsequently, occupancy for the walk-up product shall
be limited to 80 percent (294 units) until the wrap building has been issued a building permit and is under
construction.
Commissioner Boling stated having the language sends right message.
Commissioner Morales expressed that he likes the history of pumpkin patch being included in the art, the
placement of fruit trees and the farmhouse theme architecture. Likes the Harvest brand, fits in perfect with
pumpkin patch and fruit trees. He is in favor of the project with the condition described by the City Attorney.
Commissioner Daniels appreciates how much work staff put into this project and expressed he likes the
project . Architecture is different from the other cities.
Commissioner Boling concurs with the comments from his fellow Commissioners. It is well put together
project. It ties in with City Council vision having walkable neighborhood. It was a community asset pumpkin
patch that a lot of people are going to miss. He hopes the company has reached out to find an alternative
location for them.
Vice Chair Williams expressed she likes the style of the wrap building. It is a unique addition to the city. She
expressed she wants to attend a party on the rooftop deck.
Commissioner Dopp expressed the attractiveness of this quality project brings. Lewis has brought a great
project to the city. A lot of due diligence into what we want and what we are looking for in terms of quality
development that brings multiple things to our community. Although, he is not a huge fan of the farmhouse,
he likes the unique things in the farmhouse like wood paneling especially along the street. It’s really attractive.
Planning Commission really has a clear vision of what we are looking for to connect key arterials and meet
some of our housing needs as well. This project has walkability, connectivity to the rest of the community.
All of this matches well with what we are trying to do in this part of town. He commends Lewis for being
patient with us and putting in the effort to try to match the vision specifically of the General Plan.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-13 Conditional Use Permit with the revisions to Planning
Condition #2.
D3.Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council to Adopt a Comprehensive revision
to Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, adopt a Revised
Zoning Map and Repeal or Amend Several Specific Plans, Planned Communities and Master
Plans to Implement the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. This Item Will be Forwarded
to City Council for Final Action.
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and
presentation (copy on file).
Chair Dopp opened public hearing and seeing no one, closed public hearing.
Chair Dopp asked what we are looking at when it comes to mixed-use. We have a couple of metrics in
the form-based code. What is the thinking behind residential to non-residential uses and the approach
we are looking at.
Page 114
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 7 of 8
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, explained the concept of mixed-use. There were
many Commissioners prior who felt a mixed-use development should be a mix of uses. Evaluated
many areas and ultimately, at this point it is best to calibrate those right now to project and that is where
those numbers came into the form-based code. Where there is an actual defined residential to non-
residential numbers.
Chair Dopp mentioned 9th and Archibald and asked is it possible we would see some residential on that
block.
Jennifer Nakamura replied, it would be highly likely to see a mixed-use development there.
Vice Chair Williams reiterated will be revisiting in approximately 5-6 months. As was demonstrated to
us immediately, there were some specifics that just got overlooked, etc. She appreciates the fact can
be open to a whole lot more interpretation between now and whenever we come back. She hopes from
now on going forward maybe every 6 months or so, it needs to be given another look at with a lot of
revision. This is a very important document.
Jennifer Nakamura responded with the rate the state is changing legislation and types of business and
types of uses that maybe we did not consider. It is a practice we take very seriously. It’s important that
If we see something wrong, we fix it.
Vice Chair Williams commented Jennifer did a good job.
Commissioner Daniels expressed his thanks to staff. It’s very unusual with the adoption of a new code
you will find changes and revisions that is needed. The form-based code is very exciting and unique.
Commissioner Morales expressed his thanks for bringing it to the Commission. Now we have to put
the pedal to the metal so developers can get to work.
Commissioner Boling appreciates the work staff put in on this. Having a premier developer within the
city here tonight and not having them stay or comment on this, it’s a testament to Staff’s ability to work
with the development community. It speaks volumes.
Jennifer Nakamura mentioned they did have a meeting with our premier developers ahead of the
Planning Commission meeting this evening. They had a majority of their questions answered.
Chair Dopp mentioned he is shocked the level of discussion on the development code. This is a very
important moving document of what we want the city to look like. The fact that there is not much
discussion or debate on the big things we are seeing is really a testament to you, Matt and staff.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-14 Title 17 Development Code.
D. Director Announcements
Page 115
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Page 8 of 8
Matthew Burris mentioned that Rancho will be hosting the Cal Cities Planning Commission training in August.
Also, the General Plan is getting an award from the Inland Empire American Planning Association.
F. Commission Announcements - None
G. Adjournment
Motion by Vice Chair Williams, second by Commissioner Morales to adjourn the meeting, motion carried
unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill
Executive Assistant, Planning Department
Approved:
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
ORDINANCE NO.1000
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MUNICIPAL
CODE AMENDMENT ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE
TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM
TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Municipal Code
Amendment adopting a comprehensive update to the Development Code and, following the
conclusion thereof, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14, recommending that
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the proposed Municipal Code
Amendment.
2. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Municipal Code Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The City adopted its last comprehensive update to Development Code in 2010,
and has since updated and amended individual sections of that code; and
b. The City desires to adopt a comprehensive update to the Development Code in
order to (i) reflect the goals, policies, and implementation measures of the City’s updated
General Plan, adopted in December 2021; (ii) ensure compliance with applicable Federal and
State legislation; (iii) incorporate form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use
development; (iv) incorporate appropriate standards from older Specific Plan and Planned
Communities to allow for the repeal of outdated plans; (v) add new objective design standards
for multi-family and mixed-use development projects; and (vi) clarify Code content, address
existing deficiencies, and improve usability; and
c. The City has prepared a comprehensive update to the City’s Development
Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, which was updated in 2021. The City
made the Public Draft Development Code Update (“Public Draft”) available for public review on
April 7, 2022. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision and update of Title 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code that sets requirements for private development of property,
Page 123
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 2
including development standards, permitted uses, building heights, building setbacks, parking
standards, sign standards, landscaping requirements, subdivisions, animal keeping regulations,
and other development-related topics.
SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the
“Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached hereto as
Attachment B to this Ordinance, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from
the proposed Municipal Code Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that
neither a subsequent EIR, a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for
environmental review of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment. The City Council finds that
the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing
regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA
guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and
determinations:
a. On December 15, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, adopting environmental findings pursuant to CEQA for
the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, certifying the Final EIR, adopting a statement of
overriding considerations, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The
General Plan Update specifically contemplated revisions to and a comprehensive update of the
Development Code such as is accomplished by the proposed Municipal Code Amendment and
the Final EIR analyzed the impacts thereof.
b. The proposed Municipal Code Amendment does not propose substantial
changes to the City’s development regulations that were not analyzed in the Final EIR or that
will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The
proposed Municipal Code Amendment simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the
City’s updated General Plan and analyzed in the Final EIR.
c. There have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the proposed Municipal Code Amendment is being undertaken that were not
contemplated in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the Final EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects. The Final EIR addressed the impacts of adopting the
City’s updated General Plan, and revisions to the development code and was certified on
December 15, 2021. Since adoption of the updated General Plan in 2021, the City has not
processed any amendments to the Plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the
environment which would require a modification of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects.
d. There is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR
was certified that shows (a) the proposed Municipal Code Amendment will have any significant
effects not discussed in the Final EIR; (b) the significant effects examined in the Final EIR will
be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives
Page 124
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 3
previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment; or (d) considerably
different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the Final EIR would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available.
The City Council, exercising its independent judgment after considering the administrative
record, hereby adopts the Addendum to the certified Final EIR, attached hereto as Attachment
B, reaffirms the findings adopted as part of the Final EIR certification and set forth in Resolution
No. 2021-132 as remaining applicable to the proposed Municipal Code Amendment.
The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents and other materials that constitute the
record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision is based, including, but are not
limited to, the staff reports for the proposed Municipal Code Amendment, all of the materials that
comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the materials that
support the staff reports for the proposed Municipal Code Amendment, is the Planning
Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public
review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4: Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby adopts the proposed
Municipal Code Amendment adopting a comprehensive update to the Development Code, as
set forth in Attachment A attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. The
Municipal Code Amendment set forth in Attachment A replaces, in its entirety, the provisions of
the City's existing Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Municipal Code.
SECTION 5: The provisions of this Ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the same
as provisions of ordinances previously adopted by the City relating to the same matter, shall be
construed as restatements and continuations of the earlier enactment, and not as new
enactments.
SECTION 6: The adoption of this Ordinance does not affect the following matters:
a. Actions and proceedings that began before the effective date of this Ordinance.
b. Prosecution for ordinance violations committed before the effective date of this
Ordinance.
c. Licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance.
d. Collection of licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this
Ordinance.
e. Bonds and cash deposits required to be posted, filed, or deposited pursuant to
any ordinance, resolution, or regulation.
f. Matters of record that refer to or are connected with an ordinance previously
adopted by the City the substance of which is amended by this Ordinance. Such references
shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions of this Ordinance.
Page 125
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 4
SECTION 7: Any provision of the previously existing Title 17 (“Development Code”) of
the Municipal Code not included in the Municipal Code Amendment enacted by this Ordinance
is hereby repealed.
SECTION 8: Nothing in this Ordinance shall in any manner modify or otherwise affect
the following subject matters:
a. The corporate or jurisdictional limits of the City.
b. Contracts to which the City is a party.
c. City taxes.
d. City franchises.
e. Highways, roads, streets or other public right-of-way.
f. Bonds or indebtedness of the City.
g. A district, public corporation or other entity established by the City.
h. Specific public improvements or assessments.
i. Appropriation or investment of City funds.
SECTION 9: The Council hereby directs the City Clerk to make all necessary, non-
substantive conforming revisions to the Municipal Code necessary to codify this Ordinance,
including, but not limited, to clerical corrections to section numbers, table and figure references,
and cross references.
SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Page 126
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 5
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 127
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 6
Attachment A – Development Code Amendment
The Public Review Draft of the Development Code is available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Development Code (Title 17)
Page 128
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 7
Attachment B – EIR Addendum
Page 129
March 2022 | General Plan EIR Addendum
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR
SCH No. 2021050261
FOR THE
INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING
STANDARDS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact: Jennifer Nakamura
Deputy Director of Planning
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
909.477.2700
Prepared by:
PlaceWorks
Contact: Mark Teague, AICP, Managing Principal
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, California 92707
714.966.9220
info@placeworks.com
www.placeworks.com
Page 130
Page 131
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
March 2022 Page i
Section Page
1. ADDENDUM TO THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN EIR ............................................................... 3
1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM ........................................................................................................... 3
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 5
1.4 GENERAL PLAN EIR ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2. CEQA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Tabl es Page
TABLE 1 SPECIFIC PLANS AND MASTER PLANS REVISED OR REPEALED WITH ZONING CODE
UPDATE ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
TABLE 2 TABLE 2. GENERAL PLAN MODIFY EXISTING ZONING .............................................................. 9
Figures Page
Page 132
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
Page ii March 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 133
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 3 March 2022
1. Addendum to the Certified General Plan EIR
1.1 PURPOSE
This document serves as the environmental documentation for adoption of the Interim Development Code
(project, proposed project) and Zoning Map to be in compliance with the General Plan. This document is an
addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified on December 15, 2021 (State
Clearinghouse Number 2021050261), which demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR adequately
addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and that none
of the conditions described in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162,
exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not necessary.
1.2 BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2021, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the environmental impact report and
adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). The General Plan is the City’s
blueprint, or constitution, for future development. The General Plan documents the City’s long-range vision
and established clear goals, objectives, and actions to guide the community through the next 20 years.
While the General Plan is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and
implementation strategy to support future development in Rancho Cucamonga, the development code
implements general plan policies through detailed development regulations, such as specific use types and
building standards. Although the purpose and intent of zoning is different from the General Plan, State law
requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities
are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the zoning of the
property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a general plan amendment, the city must enact
a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time.
The current development code is not consistent with the intent of the character-based General Plan Land Use
Designations and does not contain the necessary standards to implement the General Plan vision for walkable,
mixed-use places. As a result, proposed Interim Development Code is designed to implement the Land Use
Designations in the General Plan, including the addition of form-based code components for the new mixed-
use place types established in the General Plan. As the City is under development pressure to implement the
newly adopted General Plan, the adoption of the Interim Development Code as an urgency ordinance will
allow the City to begin implementing the General Plan immediately.
1.3 Purpose of an EIR Addendum
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), an addendum shall be prepared if some changes or additions
to a previously certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated in CEQA Guidelines
Page 134
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 4 March 2022
Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR have occurred. As stated in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations):
When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR
shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in
the previous EIR;
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections
15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects requiring major revisions to the
General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines
Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General
Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental document to address changes to the project.
As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR):
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified
EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
Page 135
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 5
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical
changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162
calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached
to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted
negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section
15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the
project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial
evidence.
A copy of this addendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is to adopt an Interim Development Code to implement the Land Use Designation in
the General Plan as an urgency ordinance. The Interim Development Code contains provisions to ensure that
land development is consistent with the policy direction of the General Plan. As the current Development
Code was comprehensively updated in 2012, the recommendations included in the proposed project include
amendments to standards and requirements within the existing structure and format of the Code (Development
Code Update City of Rancho Cucamonga, page 3). These recommendations include topics such as General
Plan Implementation and General Code Issues, Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Objective Design Standards, and
Specific Plan and Master Plan Analysis. The fundamental elements of the Development Code update are:
• Integrating and modifying the form-based and conventional zones.
• New form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use areas along Foothill Boulevard and other
key corridors.
• Incorporation of appropriate standards from older Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the
new zoning regulations to allow for repeal of outdated plans.
• New objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use development projects to
respond to changes in state law and facilitate housing production.
• Improved administration and permit procedures to streamline development review for projects
consistent with the General Plan and ensure adequate tools for enforcement of the Development
Code.
The implementation of the General Plan is generally managed by the Development Code (Title 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code). The Development Code includes zoning districts consistent with the
General Plan and applies development standards to each zoning district that guide site layout, key design
elements, and development intensity. The proposed project also includes objective design standards for mixed
used and multi-family development as form-based elements that will be applied to base zoning districts.
Page 136
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 6 March 2022
As shown below in Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Replaces with Interim Zoning Code Update and
referenced in the General Plan EIR (Land Use and Planning, page 5.11-16), several of the existing plans in the
city would be reappealed and changed to comply with the new standards of the Interim Development Code
Update.
Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Repealed with Interim Zoning Code Update
Plan/Year Adopted or Amended Notes on Review
Empire Lakes Specific Plan (ELSP) (Also
referred to as IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific
Plan) 1994 adopted/2016 last revised
Amend the ELSP boundary to cover area as required by the Development
Agreement, with those regulations, requirements, and standards remaining in place.
The remaining ELSP areas will be regulated by policy and standards in the General
Plan Update. Areas regulated by the General Plan Update will be implemented with
the citywide code (including new form-based districts, and design standards).
Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit
Development (EH) 1988
Repeal – Develop two new zone districts (e.g., VL- EH 9000 and VL-EH 14000) to
regulate this area, consistent with the standards in the existing Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Standards not regulated by the PUD would be regulated in the
new zone districts. All other standards and procedures applicable to the VL District
would apply to the VL-EH Districts.
Etiwanda North Specific Plan (NESP) 1992 Repeal – A portion of this Plan area was amended and now regulated by the
Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan. The portion identified for low density residential can
be regulated by the existing Low Residential District standards. The remaining area
will be regulated by the Traditional Neighborhood Land Use Designation and
subsequent zoning district and the zoning that replaces the Etiwanda Highlands
Planned Unit Development (see above).
Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) 1985
adopted/2000 last revised
Repeal – A small area will be regulated by the new form-based zoning district based
on General Plan placetype. Regulate the Very Low density area with the existing
Very Low Residential District. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining
areas consistent with the standards in the Specific Plan.
Terra Vista Community Plan (TCVP) 1983
adopted/1995 last revised
Repeal – The Plan Area along Foothill Boulevard will be regulated by the new form-
based zoning district based on the General Plan Update.
The remaining area is a combination of Low Medium, Medium, Medium High, and
High zoning districts. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining areas
consistent with the standards in the TCVP.
Town Square Master Plan (TS) 2002 Repeal – This area to be regulated by policy and standards in the General Plan Areas
regulated by the General Plan will be implemented with the citywide code (including
new form-based districts, and design standards, as applicable).
Victoria Arbors Master Plan (VA) 2002 See VCP below. Victoria Arbors Master Plan overlaps with the VCP.
Victoria Community Plan (VCP) 1981 Repeal – A portion will be regulated by the applicable new form-based zoning district
based on General Plan placetype. For the remainder, the existing Low and Low
Medium Residential zoning districts will be applied based on the designation in the
VCP. The Mixed Use overlay will also be deleted as part of this effort.
Page 137
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 7
The Interim Development Code update includes modifications to existing zoning districts as well as new zoning
districts with form-based code components. Table 2, General Plan Modifying Existing Zoning Districts, displays the
following recommended zoning districts to implement each of the General Plan land use designations and if
modifications or new zoning districts are needed (Interim Development Code Update, 5). Recommendations
to implement the General Plan and create new zones to implement the new mixed-use land use designations
are provided in Section 2.B of the Interim Development code update (Interim Development Code update, 5).
Other changes to existing zoning districts may be recommended based on an assessment of General Plan
policies in Appendix A of the Interim Development Code update. Appendix A is used to identify
inconsistencies between the General Plan and the City’s Development Code and provide recommendations to
resolve those inconsistencies (Interim Development Code Update, A-1).
The Interim Development Code will facilitate development in zoned properties and bring them into compliance
with the General Plan. While zoning districts will change, the development potential and impacts are already
addressed in the General Plan EIR. In most cases, there are development standards for any new permitted use
that would not be subject to CEQA review. However, development policies, programs, ordinances, and permits
that define the development process would still apply.
Page 138
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 8 March 2022
Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning
General Plan Land
Use Designation
Implementing Zone Recommendation
Neighborhood Place Type
Semi-Rural
Neighborhood
Very Low Residential (VL) Modify to allow multi-family, civic and
neighborhood serving commercial consistent with
General Plan
Traditional
Neighborhood
TBD Discuss with City the possibility of modification of
EHNCP Zones to apply Requires additional
microscale analysis in residential areas
Suburban
Neighborhood –
Very Low
Low (L) and/or Low Medium
Residential (LM)
Modify maximum allowed density consistent with
General Plan consistent with General Plan
Suburban
Neighborhood-
Moderate
High Residential (H) Modify to ensure limited neighborhood commercial
uses allowed consistent with General Plan
Urban
Neighborhood
FBC: Urban Center New Zone consistent with General Plan
Corridor Place Type
Neighborhood
Corridor
FBC: Neighborhood General New Zone consistent with General Plan
City Corridor -
Moderate
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan
City Corridor – High FBC: Urban Corridor New Zone consistent with General Plan
District Place Type
21st Century
Employment
District
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan
Office Employment
District
Office Professional (OP) and
or Commercial Office (CO)
combination
Modify to allow mixed use, multi-family, increase
height/density, and reduce setbacks consistent with
General Plan
Page 139
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 9
1.5 GENERAL PLAN EIR
The General Plan EIR found that, with the implementation of policies and actions from the General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR,
there would be less than significant impacts related to aesthetics, energy, geology and soils, hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land
use/planning, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and services, and wildfire. As the
proposed project is intended to align the Development Code and Zoning map with the General Plan, implementation of policies and actions from the
General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR would have the same mitigating effect under the Interim Development Code and impacts
would also be less than significant.
Table 3 lists the significant and unavoidable impact determinations of the General Plan EIR and compares the resulting impacts of the proposed project
to those determinations. The General Plan EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts
to agriculture/forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation. As described
below, the proposed project would be within the scope of analysis of the General Plan update identified in the EIR. The proposed project would
incorporate all applicable General Plan policies and implementation measures for significant and unavoidable impacts identified in Table 3 and would not
create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.
Table 3: General Plan EIR Significant and Unavoidable Impacts and Impacts of the Proposed Project
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Agriculture and Forest Resources Impact 5.2-1: The proposed project would convert Farmland to non-
agricultural uses but would not result in the conversion of forest land to non-forest uses. [Thresholds AG-1 and AG-5]
The proposed project would not allow development of land that was not considered for development under
the General Plan. While current vineyards and orchards would be converted into urban uses as part of future anticipated development, they would not impact land not considered for development in the General
Plan EIR. There proposed project would not have an effect in forest lands because there are no lands
that qualify as forest or timberland.
Air Quality Impact 5.3-2: The proposed project would cause construction-generated
criteria air pollutant or precursor emissions to exceed South Coast
AQMD-recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ-2]
Impact 5.3-3: The proposed project would result in a net increase in long-
term operational criteria air pollutant and precursor emissions that
exceed South Coast AQMD-recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ-
2]
Impact 5.3-5: The proposed project would expose sensitive receptors to
substantial increases in toxic air contaminant emissions. [Threshold AQ-
3]
The General Plan Update would accommodate future development of single-family and low-rise
multifamily residential, retail, hotel, office, art/entertainment/recreation, and industrial land uses. The
proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and
impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that
analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The future development and other physical changes that could result from implementation of the Interim
Development Code would generate construction-related emissions of criteria air pollutants and
precursors. The proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General
Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the
same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in exposure of sensitive receptors due
to construction-related TAC. However, the proposed project would not change the type of development
assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim
Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Page 140
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 10 March 2022
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Biological Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout of the proposed Land Use Plan would impact
sensitive plant and animal species known to occur in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. [Threshold B-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could impact special status vegetation or special status
wildlife in the city. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim
Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Cultural Resources Impact 5.5-1: Buildout of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
could impact historic resources. [Thresholds C-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could adversely impact some of these historic
resources. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed
in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code
would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.8-4: The proposed project would be inconsistent with the
State’s ability to achieve the long-term reduction goals or Executive
Orders S-3-05, B-30-15, and B-55-18. [Threshold GHG-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in the generation of greenhouse gases.
However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the
General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would
be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Noise Impact 5.13-1: Construction activities would result in temporary noise
increases in the vicinity of the future development under the General
Plan. [Threshold N-1]
Impact 5.13-2: Project implementation could generate a substantial
permanent increase in traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses in
excess local standards. [Threshold N-2]
Impact 5.13-4: Expose new sensitive land uses to noise levels in excess
of the noise compatibility standards identified in 2040 General Plan
Noise Element Table N-1. [Threshold N-4]
Impact 5.13-5: Future development under the General Plan could
generate short-term construction vibration or exposure to new sensitive
land uses to long-term operational vibration sources that exceed City
thresholds. [Threshold N-5]
The City has established standards for acceptable noise levels in Section 17.66.050 that are consistent
with the Development Code update. Because the proposed project would not change the type or location
of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with implementation of
the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Traffic noise modeling was conducted for existing (2021) and future (2040) conditions using traffic data
generated for the 2040 General Plan, which was based on anticipated land use development
contemplated under buildout conditions through 2040. Because the proposed project would not change
the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with
implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General
Plan EIR.
New development associated with the 2040 General Plan could potentially be near existing roadways
and existing or future planned railroads. Because the proposed project would not change the type or
location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with
implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General
Plan EIR.
Implementation of standard conditions of approval 5.13-5b and 5.13-5c, which require project-specific
vibration analyses to evaluate vibration exposure from nearby transit sources and evaluation of potential
vibration impacts from new transit projects would still be required under the Interim Development Code.
Therefore, noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the
same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Page 141
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 11
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project
Transportation Impact 5.17-2: The project may be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b) regarding policies to reduce VMT. [Threshold B-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in changes to the vehicle miles traveled by
residential and non-residential development in the City. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and VMT-related impacts
associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in
the General Plan EIR..
Page 142
Page 143
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
2. CEQA Analysis
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas, open space,
mobility and access, housing, public facilities and services, resource conservation, safety, and noise. As
previously described in Section 1.4 and referenced in Table 3, the General Plan EIR addresses potentially
significant impacts related to agriculture and forestry, air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas
emissions, noise, and transportation. The policies of the General Plan and the existing development
standards apply to all development in the General Plan and would continue to apply to the land that is the
subject of the proposed project.
The proposed zoning changes are intended to align the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning Map with the
land use designations and policies and implementation measures with the General Plan and will replace or
amend specific plans and master plans previously adopted. Therefore, these changes would not result in
significant changes to the existing land uses and or development standards as compared to that analysis in
the General Plan EIR. The modification to the specific and master plans in the General Plan EIR is
consistent with the specific design standards and guidelines in the Development Code update
(Development Code Update, Appendix-H).
The General Plan EIR anticipates growth in focused areas of the community that are already designated
for development (Project Description, 3-2). The Land Use & Community Character in Section 5.11 Land
Use and Planning details policy changes for different place types. These focus areas will increase housing and
building intensity as well as create more urban spaces (Land Use and Planning, 5-11-7). The General Plan
EIR suggests Volume 4 Implementation Strategy recommends policy change in the development code
changes. (Project Description, 3-3)
Chapter 3, Project Description of the General Plan EIR, considers anticipated growth for existing and
proposed General Plan Designation as listed in Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning. The Land Use
Designations listed in Table 3 -2 Existing and Proposed Land Use Designations of the General Plan EIR display
density ranges for mix of existing land use designations that will comprise the new place type; these density
ranges are consistent with the recommendations listed in proposed Interim Development Code update
(Project Description, 3-6).
2.2 FINDINGS
The discussion in this addendum confirms that the proposed project has been evaluated for significant
impacts pursuant to CEQA.
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or new information that was not known and could
not have been known at the time of the certification of the General Plan EIR. As a result, and for the
reasons explained in this addendum, the project would not cause any new significant environmental impacts
or substantially increase the severity of significant environmental impacts disclosed in the General Plan
EIR. Thus, the proposed project does not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
Page 144
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Page 13 March 2022
requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum. Accordingly, this EIR addendum has been prepared.
The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the project.
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase
in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The proposed project will align the new zoning districts as shown in the Interim Development Code
update with the land use designations including the addition of form-based code components and
mixed -use place type descriptions assumed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed changes are
consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the updates to the
Development code would not change the conclusions of the EIR and would not require revisions to
the General Plan EIR due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects.
2. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR.
The policies and implementation measures identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply
to all development in the city and would have the same effect to reduce or eliminate environmental
impacts as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The amendments to the Development Code were
discussed in the General Plan EIR, and there is nothing in the proposed project that was not known
and could not have been known at the time the General Plan EIR was certified demonstrating that the
project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR. Therefore, no new impacts
would occur because of future development. Because a development project must be consistent with
the General Plan, zoning, and development standards of the City, the resulting impacts would be the
same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR.
Implementation of the proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed
in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and implementation measures identified in the
General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new development. These
policies would have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in
the General Plan EIR. There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant effects
examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General Plan EIR.
4. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
Page 145
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative.
The proposed project will align the zoning districts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the General
Plan Land Use Map as evaluated by the General Plan EIR. All policies and implementation measures
identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the city and would
have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in the General Plan
EIR. The proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and,
therefore, would not substantially change the conclusions of the EIR or require new mitigation
measures.
5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project changes would not result in an increase of overall development intensity and the
resulting impacts would be the same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR. Therefore,
no new mitigation measures or alternatives to the proposed project would be required.
Page 146
ORDINANCE NO.1001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REVISED OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP, AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted Planning Commission Resolution
No. 22-14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the
proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
2. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. On December 15, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, updating the City’s General Plan; and
b. State law requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the
General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities are permitted if they are consistent with both the
General Plan land use designation and zoning of the property. When a zoning ordinance
becomes inconsistent due to a General Plan amendment, a city must enact a consistent zoning
ordinance within a reasonable time; and
c. The City desires to adopt a revised official Zoning Map in order to (i) implement
zoning consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflected in the City’s
updated General Plan adopted in December 2021; and (ii) ensure compliance with applicable
State law; and
d. The City has prepared a revised official Zoning Map that implements the place
types and general plan designations of the General Plan, which was updated in 2021. The City
made the Public Draft Development Code Update (“Public Draft”) available for public review in
April 7, 2022. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision to the existing zoning map and all
new zones indicated on the revised zoning map are incorporated with development standards in
the update of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code considered concurrently with
this zoning map amendment.
Page 147
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 2
SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the
“Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as
Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming
from the proposed Zoning Map Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and
that neither a subsequent EIR, a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies
with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code
of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”)
based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
a. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the
staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning
Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ample
notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and adopted
Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14 recommending that City Council adopt the
Addendum.
b. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing, considered
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City staff
presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum. Based upon the
evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City
Council, by separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000.
c. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable
legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings,
findings, votes and other procedural matters.
d. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents, and other materials
that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision was based,
including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of the
materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the
materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, is the
Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for
public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4: Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby adopts the proposed
Zoning Map Amendment, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as
Attachment A, as the City’s official Zoning Map. The official Zoning Map attached as Attachment
A replaces, in its entirety, the City's existing official Zoning Map.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
Page 148
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 3
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
its publication in accordance with applicable law.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 149
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Page 4
Attachment A – Zoning Map Amendment
The Public Review Draft of the Zoning Map is available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Zoning Map (Title 17)
Page 150
ORDINANCE NO.1002
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC
PLAN, ETIWANDA HIGHLANDS PLANNED COMMUNITY,
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AND VICTORIA
PLANNED COMMUNITY AND AMENDING THE EMPIRE LAKES
SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PLAN
AND RENAME THE PLAN TO THE RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 22-14,
recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga repeal of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community, Terra
Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community and amend the Empire Lakes Specific
Plan.
2. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the proposed repeal of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda
North Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community, Terra Vista Planned Community,
Victoria Planned Community and proposed amendments to the Empire Lakes Specific Plan.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. On December 15, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, updating the City’s General Plan; and
b. Special planning areas are geographic areas within the city that have adopted
plans with unique use, development, and/or design regulations that vary or deviate from the
citywide zoning and development standards. Throughout the United States, special planning
areas are created for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to private development
applications for master planned communities, protection of unique resources (e.g., historic
district, environmental protection), special site considerations (e.g., hillside development, scenic
corridors), and/or special use considerations (e.g., targeted use areas, redevelopment
opportunities). Since incorporation, special planning areas in the city have been established for
all of the above listed reasons. Two such types of special planning areas are Specific Plans and
Planned Communities.
Page 151
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
Page 2
c. Over the last 40 years, the City has adopted many specific plans and planned
communities, including:
1. Etiwanda Specific Plan – Adopted in 1985
2. Etiwanda North Specific Plan – Adopted in 1992
3. Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community – Adopted in 1988
4. Terra Vista Planned Community – Adopted in 1983
5. Victoria Planned Community – Adopted in 1981
6. Empire Lakes Specific Plan – Adopted in 1994
d. These plans have been amended numerous times since their initial adoption.
Many of these specific plan areas are nearly or completely built out. Because many of the City’s
specific plans and planned communities were prepared over 30 years ago, they are difficult to
interpret and amendments are often required to accommodate different types of development
not contemplated in the 1980s and 1990s.
e. The City desires to repeal these specific plans in order to (i) reduce
inconsistencies between these plans and the Development Code and (ii) implement zoning
consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflected in the City’s updated
General Plan, adopted in December 2021; and
f. The City has incorporated applicable standards from these plans in the
Development Code to avoid the creation of non-conforming uses and structures; and
g. The Empire Lakes Specific Plan is nearly built out, with the exception of the
area between 4th Street and the Metrolink Railroad tracks, bounded immediately to the east and
west of The Resort Parkway, previously known as the Empire Lakes Golf Course.
h. The City desires to amend the Empire Lakes Specific plan to reduce the
boundaries to the area between 4th Street and the Metrolink Railroad tracks, bounded
immediately to the east and west of The Resort Parkway, previously known as the Empire
Lakes Golf Course. This portion of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan was amended in 2015 to
allow for redevelopment of the Golf Course to allow for housing and some retail uses. The
remaining portion of the boundaries of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan would be incorporated
into the Development Code.
SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the
“Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as
Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming
from the proposed Zoning Map Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and
that neither a subsequent EIR, a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies
with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code
Page 152
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
Page 3
of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”)
based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
a. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the
staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning
Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ample
notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and adopted
Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14 recommending that City Council adopt the
Addendum.
b. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing, considered
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City staff
presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum. Based upon the
evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City
Council, by separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for
the proposed Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No.1000.
c. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable
legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings,
findings, votes and other procedural matters.
d. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents, and other materials
that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision was based,
including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of the
materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the
materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, is the
Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for
public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4: The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda Specific Plan in its entirety.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in its
entirety.
SECTION 6: The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda Highlands Planned
Community in its entirety.
SECTION 7: The City Council hereby repeals the Terra Vista Planned Community in its
entirety.
SECTION 8: The City Council hereby repeals the Victoria Planned Community in its
entirety.
SECTION 9: The City Council hereby amends the Empire Lakes Specific Plan and
renames the plan The Resort Specific Plan as shown in Attachment A.
Page 153
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
Page 4
SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 154
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
Page 5
Attachment A – The Resort Specific Plan
The Public Review Draft of the Resort Specific Plan is available online for review at:
Draft Resort Specific Plan
Page 155
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING THE TOWN
SQUARE MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER
PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 22-14, recommending
that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga repeal of the Town Square Master Plan and
Victoria Arbors Master Plan.
2. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the proposed repeal of the Town Square Master Plan and Victoria
Arbors Master Plan.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2021, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. Special planning areas are geographic areas within the city that have
adopted plans with unique use, development, and/or design regulations that vary or deviate from
the citywide zoning and development standards. Throughout the United States, special planning
areas are created for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to private development
applications for master planned communities, protection of unique resources (e.g., historic district,
environmental protection), special site considerations (e.g., hillside development, scenic corridors),
and/or special use considerations (e.g., targeted use areas, redevelopment opportunities). Since
incorporation, special planning areas in the city have been established for all of the above listed
reasons. Two such types of special planning areas are Master Plans.
b. Over the last 40 years, the City has adopted many specific plans and planned
communities, including:
i. Town Square Master Plan – Adopted in 2002
ii. Victoria Arbors Master Plan – Adopted in 2002
c. These plans have been amended numerous times since their initial adoption.
Many of these specific plan areas are nearly or completely built out. Because many of the City’s
specific plans and planned communities were prepared 20 years ago, they are difficult to interpret
Page 156
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
Master Plan Repeal
May 18, 2021
Page 2
and amendments are often required to accommodate different types of development not
contemplated in the 2000’s
d. The City desires to repeal these specific plans in order to (i) reduce
inconsistencies between these plans and the Development Code and (ii) implement zoning
consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflected in the City’s updated
General Plan, adopted in December 2021; and
e. The City has incorporated applicable standards from these plans in the
Development Code to avoid the creation of non-conforming uses and structures; and
f. The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the “Final EIR”)
prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as Attachment B to Ordinance
No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the proposed Zoning Map
Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that neither a subsequent EIR, a
supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act,
its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s
local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and
determinations:
i. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed
public hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the
staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning
Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ample notice
and opportunity to comment on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and adopted Planning
Commission Resolution No. 22-14 recommending that City Council adopt the Addendum.
ii. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing,
considered the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City staff
presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence
regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum. Based upon the evidence
presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City Council, by
separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for the proposed
Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No.1000.
iii. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all
applicable legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public
hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters.
iv. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents, and other
materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision was
based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of
the materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the
materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, is the Planning
Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in
Page 157
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
Master Plan Repeal
May 18, 2021
Page 3
the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
g. The findings set forth in this Resolution reflect the independent judgment of the
City Council.
3. Determination. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the totality of
the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby repeals the Town Square Master Plan
and Victoria Arbors Master Plan.
4. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution for any reason is held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th DAY OF MAY 2022.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of
May, 2022, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 158
Development Code Update
City Council Hearing May 18, 2022
General Plan Update
•Unanimously adopted by Council on December 15, 2021
•Establishes the City’s vision and priorities for the next
10-20 years
•Guides future actions (policy choices + development
applications)
•Addresses changes in state law
•Blueprint for future development
•Enabled the community to come together to develop a
shared vision for the future
Vision and Community Values
Build on our success as a world class community to create
an equitable, sustainable and vibrant city, rich in
opportunity for all to thrive.
Big Ideas
Degrees of Change
Limited Change
Significant Change
Moderate Change
General Plan Land Plan
New Value Created
General Plan Buildout
Total Value: $32.4 billion
Avg. Value/Acre: $10.7 million
Peak Value/Acre: $58.4 million
New Value Created: $4.7 billion
Implementing Plans
Development Interest and Demand
Objectives of Development Code Update
•Codify the community’s vision as established in the
General Plan
•Improve the in the development review process and
reduce uncertainty and risk
•Consistency with State Law
Fundamental Elements of Update
•Consistency with the updated General
Plan
•New form -based zoning to articulate the
vision for walkable mixed-use areas along
Foothill Boulevard and other key corridors
•New objective design standards for multi-
family residential and mixed-use
development projects to meet state law
•Incorporation key standards from Specific Plans
and Planned Communities into the development
code to simplify development review
•Minor improvements to permit procedures to
streamline development review
•Address staff identified issues to clarify code
content and improve usability
•Compliance with State law
Repeal of Outdated Plans
Incorporation of appropriate standards from older specific
plans, master plans and planned communities into the new
zoning regulations to allow for the repeal of outdated plans:
•Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan
•Etiwanda North Specific Plan
•Etiwanda Specific Plan
•Terra Vista Community Plan
•Town Square Master Plan
•Victoria Arbors Master Plan
•Victoria Community Plan
•Empire Lakes Specific Plan -Amend to change boundary
and renamed to The Resort Specific Plan
Proposed Zoning Map
Form Based Code
Form-Based Code:
Urban Form
(Buildings and
Public Spaces)
Management
Use/Density
Conventional Zoning:
Use/Density
Management
Urban Form (Buildings and Public
Spaces)
Environmental Review
•Addendum to Environmental Impact Report for
General Plan, which was certified by City Council
in December 2021
•Development Code Update would not result in
any new significant impacts on the environment
based upon the analysis and conclusions
presented in the General Plan EIR
Planning Commission
•Release of the Public Review Draft Code –April 7, 2022
•Study Session –April 13, 2022
•Public Hearing –April 27, 2022
o No public comments
o Commission support for updates
o Unanimous recommendation for approval
o Forward to Council for final adoption with 3 minor revisions
Proposed Revisions
•Parking Requirements –17.64.050.A.2 –Recommend Deletion
o “For the purposes of calculating residential parking requirements,
dens, studies or other similar rooms that may be used as bedrooms
shall be considered bedrooms”
•Parking Requirements for Single Family 17.64.050-1
Next Steps
May 4th
Interim
Ordinance
Expires 6/19
May 18th
Permanent
Ordinance
1st Reading
June 1st
Permanent
Ordinance
2nd Reading
July 1st
Permanent
Ordinance
Effective
Next Steps
May 4th
Interim
Ordinance
Expires 6/19
May 18th
Permanent
Ordinance
1st Reading
June 1st
Permanent
Ordinance
2nd Reading
July 1st
Permanent
Ordinance
Effective
Gap in Standards
June 19-June 30
Next Steps
•Continued refinements to the code
o Expand the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)Program
o Creation of a Community Benefits Program
o Addition of more robust drive-through standards
o Inclusion of standards for development under SB9
o Addition development standards for gas stations
o Updated green building incentives
o Further implementation of the Climate Action Plan
Recommendation
•Planning Commission and Staff recommends that the City Council
o Adopt an addendum to the General Plan EIR
o Conduct first reading of Ordinance 1000, 1001 and 1002
o Adopt Resolution 2022-055
o With the proposed text change as presented
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager/Interim Planning Director
Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC2022-
00074 at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue
- WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant. The Master Plan Will
Enable the Construction of a Mixed-Use Development Comprising Of 671
Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the
Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -
98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Related Files: Design Review DRC2021-
00120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section
15183(c) Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2022-049) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve Master Plan DRC2022-00074 with the adoption of
Resolution No. 2022-049, allowing the construction of a mixed-use development comprised of
671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of non-residential space.
BACKGROUND:
On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2021-00120 and
Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024) for Site Plan and Architectural Review of a new mixed-
use project comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space. The
Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council approve a Master Plan, DRC2022-
00074, which creates specific development regulations for the proposed project and the project
site. (Attachment 1)
The project is located on a vacant 17.2-acre site on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Milliken Avenue. The project will have a proposed density of 39 dwelling units per acre,
meeting the density range of 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre required by underlying City Corridor
High General Plan Designation.
The project is split into four blocks. The northwest and northeast blocks comprise of 3-story walk-
up apartments, while the southwest block contains a clubhouse and pool area. The southeast
block contains a four-story “wrap” building, where residential and commercial units wrap around
an above-ground parking structure (Attachment 2). All commercial and restaurant space proposed
for the project is contained within the Foothill Boulevard frontage of the wrap building along the
ground floor. The wrap building “anchors” the project site with great building placement along
Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
Page 159
Page 2
1
2
5
6
All buildings within the project site are designed in a modern interpretation of the classic American
farmhouse architectural style. All front facades and building entrances are oriented towards
streets and/or sidewalks, helping create a safe and active streetscape. The building placement,
appropriate landscape features, and the overall site design creates the feel of an urban, walkable
environment as envisioned in the General Plan.
ANALYSIS:
One of the objectives of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of
a subarea of the city to allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be
built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards.
The proposed Master Plan (Attachment 3) contains a specific set of development standards which
intends to accomplish two objectives: (1) accommodate a highly walkable public realm; and (2)
enable a smooth transition of density and development intensity between the project site and the
surrounding neighborhood.
The Master Plan accommodates a well-balanced, functional, and highly walkable public realm
through the utilization of increased building setbacks in specific areas of the project, primarily
along Foothill Boulevard and along Milliken Avenue. The increased setbacks range from 2 feet to
10 feet greater than the maximum setback under the interim Development Standards. However,
the increased setbacks are minor in comparison to the overall project and allow flexibility with
building placement to provide greater opportunity for wider sidewalk widths and the inclusion of
outdoor dining/gathering space to support the ground-floor commercial operations. This also
encourages pedestrian activity throughout the project and around the project, particularly along
Foothill Boulevard.
Additionally, the Master Plan also allows for the development of 3-story walk-up buildings along
the project’s frontage along Church Street, which would otherwise be required to be a minimum
of 4 stories through the applicable development standard. However, the 3-story buildings enable
a smooth transition of density and development intensity between the 4-story wrap building
proposed along Foothill Boulevard and the existing two-story apartments north of Church Street,
while still meeting the vision and expectations of the General Plan.
The larger building setbacks and the development of 3-story buildings currently cannot be
accommodated through the City’s interim Mixed-Use development standards for the Mixed-Use
Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District that were applicable at the time this project was deemed
complete. Approval of the Master Plan will allow an increase in the maximum setback and a
decrease in the minimum structure height, both of which will enable the project to be developed
in a unique way that fully meets the vision of the General Plan that is not otherwise possible with
the interim development standards.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan
(GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on
December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor – High”
land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling
units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from
0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared
on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives
the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation
measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental
impacts on a comprehensive scale.
Page 160
Page 3
1
2
5
6
Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not peculiar to the
parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be
substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or
standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that
impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High”
land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family
residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and
would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR is required for the proposed project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section
15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit
M – CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and
concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City’s
GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that
additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to
a level of less than significant.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The applicant has submitted a Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by the Development Planning &
Financing Group (DPFG), dated March 29, 2022. The Fiscal Impact Analysis concluded that the
project would produce an annual recurring surplus to the General Fund in the amount of $246,000.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed mixed-use project in conjunction with the proposed master plan achieves the City
Council Vision of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, and also promoting and
enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. The General Plan envisions Foothill Boulevard
to be the City’s mixed-use corridor, featuring a variety of urban developments that will enable
vibrant, walkable neighborhoods for residents, businesses, and visitors to enjoy. The proposed
mixed-use development fits in this vision by developing a walkable neighborhood containing
residential opportunities and a range of commercial/retail opportunities properly arranged around
strong circulation and connectivity within the site and to other future developments.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – April 20, 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report with Exhibits
Attachment 2 – Project Plans
Attachment 3 – Master Plan DRC2022-00074
Attachment 4 – City Council Resolution No. 2022-049
Page 161
DATE: April 27, 2022
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager – Community and Economic
Development/Interim Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
MILLIKEN AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request
to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development comprising of
671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space within the Mixed-Use
Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-
38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action:
Approve Design Review DRC2021-00120 and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024) through the
adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
Recommend to City Council the approval of Master Plan DRC2022-00074 through the adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development with 671 apartment units and
20,841 square feet of commercial space on a 17.2-acre site.
BACKGROUND:
The 17.2-acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue and is
zoned Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District. The project site covers approximately three-fourths of the
city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Church Street to the north, and
Foothill Boulevard to the south (Exhibit A - Aerial). The project site is “L” shaped with frontages along Elm
Avenue, Church Street, Milliken Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard, interrupted only by an existing shopping center
located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site slopes from north to south and
is covered by low vegetation.
The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are
as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District
North Multifamily Residential Suburban
Neighborhood Moderate Medium High (MH) Residential District 1
South Commercial/Retail Pad
Buildings/Uses
City Corridor High Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC)
District 1,2
Attachment 1Page162
Page 2 of 7
1
2
2
6
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
A. Overview and Site Layout: The project has a proposed density of 39 dwelling units per acre, meeting the
density range of 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre required by the City Corridor High General Plan Designation.
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west split the project into four areas, creating a block
network within the site (Exhibit B – Detailed Site and Landscape Plan). A description of what is proposed for
each block/quadrant as well as the project’s interior streets are outlined below:
i.) Interior Streets
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west are proposed within the project site. The
north-south interior street runs from Church Street and connects to an existing driveway leading to Foothill
Boulevard. The east-west interior street runs from Milliken Avenue and connects to an existing driveway
leading to Elm Avenue. These interior streets are designed with the look, feel, and function of
neighborhood streets to help create an urban environment that is envisioned by the General Plan. The
urban environment is enhanced further with proper building placement along the streets, “on-street”
angled parking, and appropriate landscape features. The interior streets intersect toward the center of
the project, creating a balanced circulation pattern throughout the site.
ii.)Northwest and Northeast
These two blocks are primarily comprised of 3-story walk-up apartments with entrances oriented either
toward the project boundaries abutting public streets or the interior streets within the site. Stand-alone
garages, surface parking areas, and trash enclosures are plotted within the interior of these two blocks,
screening these facilities from public view.
iii.) Southwest
A clubhouse, pool, and dog park occupy this block. The clubhouse contains the leasing office, fitness
center, and multi-purpose room. The clubhouse building is oriented towards the project’s two interior
streets. The southern portion of block abuts a parking area for an existing shopping center.
iv.) Southeast
This block contains a four-story “wrap” building, where residential and commercial units wrap around an
above-ground parking structure. All 20,841 square feet of commercial and restaurant space proposed for
the project is contained within the Foothill Boulevard ground frontage of the wrap building. As such, a
small surface parking lot is proposed west of the wrap building, primarily servicing the commercial spaces.
Building entrances are proposed along all four sides of the building for pedestrians, while vehicle
entrances to the parking structure are available along the west and north elevation. The wrap building
“anchors” the project site with great building placement along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
The wrap building’s setback ranges from 0 feet to 20 feet from the property line along Foothill Boulevard,
creating a significant architectural presence at a primary intersection in the city. The setback range also
allows opportunity for enhanced sidewalk widths and outdoor dining/gathering space to support the
ground-floor commercial and encourage a walkable environment.
B. Architecture: All buildings within the project site are designed in the modern interpretation of the classic
American farmhouse. Design elements that reinforce the farmhouse architecture include batten board siding,
Shopping Center Industrial Park (IP) District3
Hospital (part) East Vacant (part)City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office (MHO)
District 1
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community; 2 – north of Foothill Boulevard; 3 – south of Foothill Boulevard
Page 163
Page 3 of 7
1
2
2
6
corrugated metal awnings, wood railings, sloped roofs, and a primarily white and gray color scheme.
Contemporary architectural elements such as horizontal wood siding, stucco, flat roofs, large windows, and
horizontal metal beams are also incorporated into the buildings, giving the farmhouse design a modern
appearance. All building materials are carried to all elevations. Horizontal articulation along the building
planes as well as vertical articulation on rooflines breaks down the building massing and creates architectural
interest (Exhibit C – Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings).
The ground floor commercial frontages on the south side of the wrap building (facing Foothill Boulevard) are
treated with a variety of architectural elements that blend the farmhouse and modern styles together (Exhibit
D – Partial Foothill Elevation). Elements such as corrugated metal awnings and eyebrow canopies placed at
different heights and distances from the curb, further enhance the overall architecture by creating visual
interest and variation at the storefronts. Additionally, the commercial space is designed with a ceiling height
of roughly 16 feet to accommodate a range of commercial uses, as required by the General Plan.
C. Unit Composition and Floor Plans: All residential units will be housed in either 3-story walk-ups on the
northeast and northwest portions of the site, or within the 4-story wrap building at the site’s southeast corner.
A total of 323 and 348 units will be located within the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building,
respectively, with the project providing a grand total of 671 apartments. Studios range in size from 488 to
659 square feet, while 1-bedroom units range from 634 to 1,004 square feet. 2-bedroom units range from
933 to 1,261 square feet. Additionally, 20,841 square feet of ground floor commercial space is located along
the 4-story wrap building’s Foothill Boulevard frontage. The table below summarizes the unit composition for
both the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building.
UNIT SUMMARY
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
-Studio 84 units 33 units 117 units
-1 Bedroom 153 units 194 units 347 units
-2 Bedroom 86 units 121 units 207 units
TOTAL 323 units 348 units 671 units
Commercial
-Commercial (SF)N/A 20,841 20,841
D. Recreation Amenities: The project provides 10 active residential amenities. Resident amenities include two
pool/spa areas, an indoor gym, a community multi-purpose room with kitchen, an enclosed dog park with
separate areas for small and large dogs, an observation deck, outdoor exercise area, outdoor gaming area,
eight BBQ grill areas, and an enclosed children’s play area (Exhibit E – Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity
Details).
E. Fencing and Access: Most of the project site is ungated and is therefore publicly accessible by foot or by
car. Vehicular entrances and sidewalks to the project’s two interior streets from Church Street, Foothill
Boulevard, Elm Avenue, and Milliken Avenue are ungated. There are three pedestrian gates/fences that
control access to the two clubhouse/pool areas and the fitness courtyard within the wrap building. The only
vehicular gate on the property is utilized to separate the upper levels of the wrap building parking structure
that is designated for residents from the first story of the parking structure that is primarily dedicated to
commercial uses (Exhibit F – Wall and Fence Plan).
F. Master Plan and Proposed Development Standards: One of the objectives of a Master Plan is to allow for
the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to allow the development of an
exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of
Page 164
Page 4 of 7
1
2
2
6
existing development standards. The project includes a Master Plan application (Master Plan 2022-00074)
which proposes a site-specific set of development standards (Exhibit G – Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan).
These standards are meant to accommodate a well-balanced, functional, and highly walkable public realm
within and around the project. The master plan is also intended to enable the development of two primary
building types (3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building). The table below lists the development
standards proposed with Master Plan Master Plan 2022-00074.
PROPOSED SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
Density (dwelling units/acre)36 DU/AC
Front Setback1 - Foothill Boulevard 0’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Milliken Avenue 12’ to 20’
Front Setback1 – Church Street 15’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Elm Avenue 10’ to 15’
Front Setback1 - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets)5’ to 7’
Interior Setback
(West property line facing adjacent shopping center)124’
Interior Setback
(South property line facing adjacent shopping center)56’
Distance Between Buildings Per Building Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area)Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit (100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter 17.64 (see below)
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is generally at the inside edge of the adjacent sidewalk
(public right-of-way)
G. Walkability: The project provides a complete pedestrian network, with sidewalks provided on both sides of
all interior streets and along the project perimeter. Sidewalks along the interior streets are proposed to be 5
feet in width, while sidewalks along the project perimeter adjacent to public streets are 8 to 10 feet wide,
allowing adequate space for pedestrian activity (Exhibit H – Walkway Circulation Plan). The proposed
pedestrian routes are dotted with linear parks, seating areas, and landscaping, and uninterrupted by blank
expanses or parking lots, resulting in an attractive walking environment. All front facades and building
entrances are oriented towards streets/sidewalks, helping create a safe and active streetscape.
H. Parking: The project’s master plan is designed to mirror the City’s current parking requirements as described
in Section 17.64 of the Development Code. Based on all proposed uses on site, the project is required to
provide 1,468 parking stalls, 671 of which are required to be in a garage or carport. Required parking includes
tenant and visitor parking for the residential portion of the project, as well as parking for all commercial
spaces. The project provides 1,468 parking stalls, 942 of which are covered, meeting the parking requirement
(Exhibit I – Parking Plan). In order to ensure that on-site parking is properly managed, the applicant has
provided a Parking Management Plan (Exhibit J – Parking Management Plan). This Parking Management
Plan outlines how residential, guest, and commercial parking spaces are assigned, and details enforcement
actions that apartment management can take in response to any potential parking violations. The following
parking analysis table provides a breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces on-site.
PARKING ANALYSIS
Page 165
Page 5 of 7
1
2
2
6
Number
of Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit
(studio)117 N/A 1.3 per unit
(1 in garage or carport)152
Multi-family unit
(One bedroom)347 N/A 1.5 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit
(Two bedrooms)207 N/A 2 per unit
(1 in garage or carport)414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail)N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34
Commercial
(Restaurant)N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
I. Tentative Map: The project includes the subdivision of the project site into four (4) numbered lots for
condominium purposes, for the development of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space
(Exhibit K – Tentative Map 20120). Each lot will help facilitate construction, circulation, and other components
of the project.
J. Public Art: This project is required to provide public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development
Code. Based on the number of residential units and commercial square footage for this project, the total art
value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $524,091. A condition has been included pursuant to the
Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy.
K. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Williams, Morales)
on March 15, 2022. The Committee recommended approval of the project to the full Planning Commission.
This is reflected in the in the Design Review Committee Comments (Exhibit L – DRC Minutes dated March
15, 2022).
L. General Plan Consistency: The General Plan designations are centered around four primary components:
Land Use and Development Intensity, Built Form and Character, Access and Connectivity, and Parks and
Open Space. The project is located in the Corridor High designation of the General Plan, which is intended
to provide for medium to high intensity developments along Foothill Boulevard that include a range of
amenities, conveniences, housing options, and more at the edges of many existing and future
neighborhoods.
The project has been well-designed to align with the Corridor High designation. The project proposes a
density of 39 units per acre, which falls within the expected range of the Corridor High designation of 36-60
units per acre. The proposed site plan includes proper building placement near the sidewalks with proper
orientation to exterior or interior streets to accommodate active frontages and ground floor uses. The strategic
placement of the buildings forms strong circulation patterns and streetscapes, helping create the desired
urban character of the Corridor. The project site also has the benefit of street frontage on four sides and has
taken advantage of those frontages to provide easy access and strong connectivity. The site is divided into
quadrants, using privately owned streets to create walkable blocks in and throughout the project site. While
the streets are privately owned, they will be public accessible and designed to look, feel, and function like
public streets, as envisioned by the General Plan.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
Page 166
Page 6 of 7
1
2
2
6
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan (GPU) and certified
a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the
GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential
development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development
at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a
Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a
Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide
mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental
impacts on a comprehensive scale.
Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the
project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the
imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared
for the project solely on the basis of that impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General
Plan for “City Corridor – High” land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722
multi-family residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed
Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and would be
consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the
proposed project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance
Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope
of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed,
and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a
level of less than significant.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of
the project site. To date, no written correspondence, phone calls, or in person inquiries have been received
regarding the project notifications.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
It is the City Council’s vision to make Foothill Boulevard the City’s mixed-use corridor, featuring a variety of urban
developments that will enable a vibrant, walkable neighborhood that residents, workers, and visitors can enjoy.
The proposed mixed-use development fits in this vision by developing a block of this mixed-use corridor.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Aerial
Exhibit B - Detailed Site and Landscape Plan
Exhibit C - Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings
Exhibit D - Partial Foothill Elevation
Exhibit E - Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity Details
Exhibit F - Wall and Fence Plan
Exhibit G - Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan
Exhibit H - Walkway Circulation Plan
Exhibit I - Parking Plan
Exhibit J - Parking Management Plan
Exhibit K - Tentative Map 20120
Page 167
Page 7 of 7
1
2
2
6
Exhibit L - Draft DRC Minutes dated March 15, 2022
Exhibit M - CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
Exhibit N - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-12 TTM Harvest
Exhibit O - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-11 DR Harvest
Exhibit P - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-10 MP Harvest
Exhibit Q - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit R - Statement of Agreement
Page 168
CHURCH STREETFOOTHILL BOULEVARDELM STREET
MILLIKENAVENUE600'
6
0
0
'600'600'600'BASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KPKPKPKPKPKP GAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKP
UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINT
KP
KP
KPKP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP UP18RKPKPKPKP
KPKPKPKP KPKP KPKPKPKPUP18R
UP18RS
S/CBAS
E
POINT
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEGAR. 06MPOEKPKP
KPELECTRICALKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP KPKPUP18RFIRERISER
UP18RKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP KPKPKP
KPKPKP UP18R
UP18R
SS/CBASEPOINTELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEGAR. 06MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPUP18RFIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RUP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RBASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KPKPKPKPKPKPGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKPKPKPKP UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINT KP KP KP KPUP18R KP KP KP
BASEPOINT
BASEPOINT
GAR. 01 / A2
KP KPKP KPKPKPGAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT KPKPKP KPUP18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINTKP
KP
KP
KPUP18RKPKP
KPBASEPOINTBASEPOINTGAR. 01 / A2KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1BASEPOINTKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RGAR. 03 / B1BAS
EPOINT
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP222PRINTER222PRINTER22PRINTER22PRINTER22KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KPKPKP
KPKP
KPKPKPKPUP18RSS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)KPDUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP KP KP KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.5' DIA.3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UP30"2449 30"244930"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49 30"24
49
30"24494.8%7.2%30"24
49
30"2449
08.67 TC08.00 FLIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJANUARY 10, 202217.29 AC. GROSS TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2012017.29 AC. NETAPN: 1077-422-51,52,54,55 AND 1090-121-284 NUMBERED LOTS(198 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)SITE UTILIZATION MAP SUM-01WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEMADOLE&ASSOCIATES, INC.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAHARVEST AT TERRA VISTADATE: JANUARY 10, 2022JOB NO. 126-2647CIVIL ENGINEEROWNER/DEVELOPERMADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730CONTACT: MARK BERTONE(909) 481-6322 ext. 120Email: mbertone@madoleinc.comAO ARCHITECTS144 NORTH ORANGE STORANGE, CA 92866CONTACT: IOANNA MAGIATI (714) 639-9860Email:ioannam@aoarchitects.com1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVEUPLAND, CA. 91786CONTACT: BRIAN JACOBSON(909) 579-1214 OFFICEEmail: Brian.Jacobson@lewismc.comARCHITECTSITESCAPES, INC.3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVECOSTA MESA, CA. 92626CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS(949) 644-9370Email: rpolhamus@sitescapes.netLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLCNTSVICINITY MAPMILLIKEN CHURCHMAYTEN PROJECT LOCATIONELM
FOOTHILLSTREETAVENUE
AVENUEEUCALYPTUSSTREET
AVENUEBOULEVARDSPRUCE
AVENUE
J:\126-2647\tentative\SUM.dwg, 1/10/2022 10:59:04 AM, dmartinezExhibit A Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
22'-0"FITNESSCO-WORKBREEZEWAYENTRYFITNESSELECTRICAL\MPOELEASINGENTRY23'-6"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE 124789612'-1"
T.O. PLATECO-WORKENTERTAINMENTENTERTAINMENTLEASING20'-3"
23'-6 1/2"
22'-0"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMEN5'-0"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA1.0CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATIONS1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'EAST ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATIONWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WEST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATIONWESTSOUTH EASTNORTHExhibit C Page 172
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMEN5'-0"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.A1.1CLUBHOUSE - RENDERINGSWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833FITNESS CORNER4LEASING CORNER2COVERED WALKWAYP
4
1ENTRYP3P2P1 Page 173
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMENPORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.POOL EQUIP.10'-0" X 15'-0"WCDOG WASHWCSHOWERSA1.2CLUBHOUSE - GROUND FLOOR PLAN NORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16' Page 174
A1.3CLUBHOUSE - ROOF PLAN NORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16' Page 175
± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"123457968629'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOFUP18RSSSKP
KP
KP
KPKPKPUP18R S
FIRERISERKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 40'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.0ELEVATIONS - 20 PLEXLEFTFRONTRIGHTREARFRONT ELEVATION1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'P2P1REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONFRONTREARWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPLOCATION OF ART** Page 176
A3S1A2S2488 SF682 SF615 SF824 SFLEVEL 1121'-0"64'-1"MPOE ELECTRIALFIRERISER
UP18RSS/CSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE KPKPKPELECTRICAL
KPKPKPUP18RFIRERISERKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"
26'-11"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"5'-0"10'-10"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"15'-10"14'-2"9'-3"10'-5"9'-3"19'-5"121'-0"B1A3A3S1A2S2A1488 SF824 SFLEVEL 2824 SF615 SF682 SFB11,008 SF744 SFB11,008 SFSSS/CSSSUP18RDN18RUP18RDN18R4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12PER FOOT63'-9"
12'-0"11'-0"12'-2"17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"8'-0"11'-11"9'-6"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"
8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"
26'-11"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"5'-0"10'-10"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"15'-10"14'-2"9'-3"10'-5"9'-3"19'-5"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'A2.1 BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEXWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT) Page 177
B1B1A3A3S1A2S2A11,008 SFLEVEL 3B1488 SF824 SF824 SF615 SF682 SF1,008 SF744 SFSDN18RSS/CSSSDN18R3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT 121'-0"63'-9"122'-4"66'-2"ROOF3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT1'-0"TYP.1/4:12PER FOOT, TYP.10'-6"
12'-3"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"1'-0"TYP.1/4:12PER FOOT, TYP.HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.2BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING Page 178
UP18RSSSSKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
UP18RS
SDS/CFIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"123457896± 41'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 41'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 38'-6" TOTOP OF ROOF± 37'-10" TOTOP OF ROOF± 40'-5" TOTOP OF ROOF± 42'-0" TOTOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.3ELEVATIONS - 23 PLEX1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'LEFTFRONTRIGHTREARP2P1FRONT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONFRONTREARWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833-STORY WALK-UPLOCATION OF ART** Page 179
138'-0"UP18RSSKPKPKPELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE KPKPKPELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
61'-3"
8'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"6'-5"9'-4"5'-0"10'-10"138'-6"SSSSSUP18RDN18RUP18RDN18R3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT63'-9"
10'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"15'-7"8'-9"4'-9"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"6'-5"9'-4"5'-0"10'-10"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.4 BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT) Page 180
138'-6"DN18RDN18RSSSSS3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT63'-9"140'-6"3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
10'-0"7:12SLOPE, TYP.1'-0"TYP.10'-0"2'-0"7'-2"6'-0"
1'-0"
TYP.
2'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"10'-0"4'-6"
66'-2"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.5BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING Page 181
SSSSSSUP18RUP18RS
S
SDS/C
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT 3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"1234567896± 40'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 37'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"± 40'-9" TOTOP OF ROOF29'-3" 3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 37'-3" TOTOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA2.6ELEVATIONS - 37 PLEX1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'LEFTFRONTRIGHTREARP2P1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FRONTREARFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION3-STORY WALK-UP Page 182
210'-6"SSSELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE ELECTRICALUP18R
UP18RSKPKPKPKPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT61'-3"9'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"8'-8"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"8'-9"4'-9"6'-4"9'-4"13'-0"11'-0"12'-2"22'-6"
7'-8"9'-7"11'-6"14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"210'-6"SSSSSSSSUP18RDN18RSUP18RDN18R3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT63'-9"9'-1"11'-4"11'-7"10'-8"26'-11"11'-0"12'-0"11'-0"13'-6"11'-2"12'-4"8'-9"4'-9"6'-4"9'-4"13'-0"11'-0"22'-6"
7'-8"9'-7"11'-6"14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"
7'-0"
8'-8"11'-0"4'-1"4'-3"12'-6"10'-8"7'-9"8'-3"11'-9"17'-5"6'-4"11'-0"12'-0"
12'-0"11'-0"12'-2"17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"8'-0"11'-11"9'-6"1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.7BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT) Page 183
210'-6"DN18RSSSSSSSSSDN18RS3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT63'-9"212'-6"3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12PER FOOT3:12PER FOOT7'-6"
17'-6"7'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"1'-0"
TYP.
1'-0"TYP.15'-0"T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"T.O.P.=+5'-9"66'-1"ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEWBY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)AC UNIT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'3-STORY WALK-UPA2.8BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX 3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING Page 184
UNIT S1 (FLOORS 1-3 ADA)STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 488 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.21'-3"36'-2"LIVINGROOM11'-6"x8'-7"FLEXDININGKITCHENBATHW/DSLEEPING9'-2"x8'-6"PATIO11'-6"x6'-11"ENTRY6'-11"REFPCB36"x60" Q4'-3"CBCBUNIT A2 (FLOORS 1-3 - ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 682 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 73 SQ. FT.23'-5"36'-2"BEDROOM11'-6"x11'LIVINGROOM11'-0"x16'-6"PATIO11'-0"x7'-4"KITCHENW/DLBATHENTRYCB
7'-4"36"x 60" PREFDININGROOM5'-2"QUNIT A1 (UPPER FLOORS - NON-ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 744 SQ. FT.BALCONY : 44 SQ. FT.32'-6"24'-10"LIVINGROOM12'-2"x15'-2"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"BALCONY8'-0"x5-4"FLEX8'-0"x8'-4"ENTRYBATHW.I.C.KITCHENREFPDKW36"x60" 5MdfSHLVS
FURNITURELIVINGROOM11'-8"x15'-2"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-6"BALCONY7'-10"x5'-2"KITCHENFLEXDINING8'-0"x8'-4"ENTRYW.I.C.PUNIT B1 (UPPER FLOORS NON-ADA)2 BDRM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1008 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 53 SQ. FT.43'-4"24'-10"DBATHBATHREFW.I.C.Q36" x 60"KW36" x 60"5MdfSHLVSBUILT-INISLANDENTRYCBCBKITCHEN
PLIVINGROOM12'-2"x12'-6"PATIO11'-4"x6'-6"BEDROOM11'-6"x13'-0"BATHW.I.C.W/DBATHBEDROOM11'-0"x12'-6"UNIT B2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)2 BDRM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,128 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 92 SQ. FT.35'-10"36'-8"DININGROOM36" x 60"LLREFW.I.CBUILD OUTON FIRSTFLOOR ONLYKQBUILT-IN
ISLAND
36" x 60"UNIT S2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 615 SQ. FT.17'-0"36'-2"LIVINGROOM13'-8"x15'-8"BATHENTRYW/DSLEEPING8'-10"x9'-4"CLOSET KITCHENREFPLINENQ3'-6"36"x60" UNIT A3 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)1 BDRM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 824 SQ. FT.PATIO : 126 SQ. FT.24'-4"40'-6"BEDROOM11'-0"x12'-0"PATIO12'-1"x10'-5"KITCHENLIVINGROOM13'-6"x12'-3"DININGROOMW.I.C.ENTRYREFK23'-4"LPCOATSBATHW/D L36"x60" CBCB BUILT-INDESKA3.0UNIT PLANS3/16"=1'-0"4' 8' 16'0 2'1'3-STORY WALK-UPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283 Page 185
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.03-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF CHURCH AND ELMELM AVENUE Page 186
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"2449
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.13-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CHURCH STREET ENTRYCHURCH STREET Page 187
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"2449
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.23-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND CHURCHMILLIKEN AVENUE Page 188
1299'-1"T.O. PLATE9'-1"T.O. PLATE±20'-9"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±20'-9"T.O. ROOF±20'-9"T.O. ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONA5.0ELEVATION G-11/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283STAND ALONE GARAGELOCATION OF ART** Page 189
9±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE12±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONA5.1ELEVATION G-2WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGE Page 190
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE912±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.2ELEVATION G-3WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION Page 191
1299±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.3ELEVATION G-4WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION Page 192
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE2911. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.4ELEVATION G-5WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION Page 193
±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE29±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±16'-10"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE11. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.5ELEVATION G-6WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION Page 194
9'-1"T.O. PLATE129'-1"T.O. PLATE±13'-8"T.O. ROOF9'-1"T.O. PLATE±13'-8"T.O. ROOF±13'-8"T.O. ROOF91. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEA5.6ELEVATION G-7WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'STAND ALONE GARAGEFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLOCATION OF ART** Page 195
Page 196
12345678963RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE15'-0"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 54'-2"TOP OF ROOF± 57'-3" TOT.O. FIN1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1SOUTH ELEVATION2SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SE CORNER PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831WRAPB2.0ELEVATION - SOUTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'23 Page 197
12456789633RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE15'-0"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 54'-2"TOP OF ROOF± 57'-3" TOT.O. FIN1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.1ELEVATION - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'1SOUTH ELEVATION2SOUTH ELEVATION2MATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH Page 198
ROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGE123456789
3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"10'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"12'-1"LOUNGET.O. PLATE± 51'-10"TOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1EAST ELEVATION1322NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3EAST PERSPECTIVEROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.2ELEVATION - EAST1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 199
123457891. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEROOF LOUN
G
EROOF LOUN
G
E6
3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"10'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"12'-1"LOUNGET.O. PLATE± 51'-10"TOP OF ROOFWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.3ELEVATION - EAST ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'1EAST ELEVATION2EAST ELEVATION2MATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH1 Page 200
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 51'-0"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"10'-11"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 53'-4"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1NORTH ELEVATION2NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132ROOF LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.4ELEVATION - NORTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 201
1234567891. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 51'-0"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"10'-11"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 53'-4"TOP OF PARAPETWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831WRAPB2.5ELEVATION - NORTH ENLARGEMENT1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'21NORTH ELEVATION2NORTH ELEVATIONMATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH Page 202
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 52'-3"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 57'-3"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEB2.6 ELEVATIONS - WEST1WEST ELEVATION2NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132RESIDENT'S LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGERESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAP1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 203
12456781. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE393RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 52'-3"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 57'-3"TOP OF PARAPETB2.7 ELEVATIONS - WEST1WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAP1NORTH ELEVATION2NORTH ELEVATIONMATCH MATCHMATCH MATCH1/8"=1'-0"24'08'4'16'2 Page 204
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL UP18R
FIRE RISERUP18R
S
S/CJ
S
S/C
SELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE MPOEKPKP
KP ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKP KP
KP
UP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
SS/C
J
S
S/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KPKP
KPKP
S
KP
KP
KPKP
KP KP
KPELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKP
KP
KP ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISERUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
SS/C
SS
PATIO
JSS/C
S
PATIO
J
SS/C
KPKPKPKPKPKP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
MPOE
FIRE RISE
R
KPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KPELECTRIC
A
L
M
A
IN
S
ER
V
IC
E
ELECTR
I
C
AL
S
SDS/C
SREF 3DP CBSD
S/CSJ
S
S/C
S
S
PATIOJSS/CS
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISERKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALS SDS/C
SREF
3D
P
CBSDS/CS
J
S S/CSS
PATIO
J S
S/C
S
PATIO JS S/CKP KP KP
KP KPKP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP KP
KP KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3DPCB
SD
S/CSJ
SS/C
S
SPATIOJ
S
S/CSPATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SDS/C
SREF
3D
P
CBSDS/C
S
2
22PRINTER
222
PRINTER
22PRINTER22
PRINTER2
2
BREE
ZW
AYMPOE/
I
T
JAN
I
TORMAINTENA
NC
E/
STOR
AGERESTRO
OM
MEN
WOM
ENELEC.
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
RTRT MAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
SS/C
JSS/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-0"
X
58
'
-6
"YOGA30'-0
"
X
17
'
-0
"CO-WORK20'-6
"
X
27
'
-4
"
LEAS
ING
25'-
0
"
X
32
'
-0
"RESTRO
OMOFFIC
E
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-
0"OFFICE11'-0" X
11
'
-0
"OFFIC
E
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-
0"OFFICE11'-0" X
11
'
-0
"BREAK
RM
.
11'-0"
X
1
6
'-
0
"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0
"
X
23
'
-0
"CONF.17'-0" X
1
3
'
-6
"CONF.10'-0"
X
1
3
'-
6
"PORCH19'-0
"
X
2
2'
-
0"#####
#
##
##
##
#
####
##
##
#
##
##
#####
##
##
##
##
####
##
##
#
##
##
POOL
EQU
IP
.
10'-3
"
X
15
'
-
0"
WC
WCSHOW
ER
S MAIL
UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENAN
TTRASHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANT
TRA
SHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOM
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGTURNAROUNDGGG1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UPA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"24
49
B4B3A4B3 ABOVEA4A5A1B1A330"24
49
30"2449A3
A5A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRYA4A3A430"24 49
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORR
IDOR SERVICE CORR
IDOR
OPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49
A330"24
49
A3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3B3 ABOVE20PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY#############LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17B39LVLV30"24
49A3
A118A3 ABO
VE
A330"24
49POOLEQUIPMENTMAIL& PARCELS###########MEN WOMEN
B3
A
BOV
E
B3ALT 2B3ALT 1A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 2B4A5ALT 1LVA8T.B.D34 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS 14 18 134.8%7.2%
16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"24
49 ELECT. ROOMB
3
A330"24
49ELECT. ROOM32BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SF123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7
MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.CHURCH ST
.TMAINT.EXISTINGTERRA VISTA COMMONSRETAIL CENTERN.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATIONB-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXG-76-GARAGESG-628-GARAGESG-530-GARAGESG-422-GARAGESG-320-GARAGESG-224-GARAGESG-118-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDB-520-PLEXMAINT.WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283B2.8WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS51627348VIEW 1 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 350' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 2 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 340' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 3 "LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVE AND FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 160' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 4 " LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 170' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING". Page 205
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL UP18R
FIRE RISERUP18R
S
S/CJ
S
S/C
SELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE MPOEKPKP
KP ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKP KP
KP
UP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
SS/C
J
S
S/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KPKP
KPKP
S
KP
KP
KPKP
KP KP
KPELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOEKP
KP
KP ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISERUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
SS/C
SS
PATIO
JSS/C
S
PATIO
J
SS/C
KPKPKPKPKPKP
ELECT
R
IC
A
L
MPOE
FIRE RISE
R
KPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KPELECTRIC
A
L
M
A
IN
S
ER
V
IC
E
ELECTR
I
C
AL
S
SDS/C
SREF 3DP CBSD
S/CSJ
S
S/C
S
S
PATIOJSS/CS
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISERKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
KP ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICALS SDS/C
SREF
3D
P
CBSDS/CS
J
S S/CSS
PATIO
J S
S/C
S
PATIO JS S/CKP KP KP
KP KPKP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP KP
KP KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3DPCB
SD
S/CSJ
SS/C
S
SPATIOJ
S
S/CSPATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SDS/C
SREF
3D
P
CBSDS/C
S
2
22PRINTER
222
PRINTER
22PRINTER22
PRINTER2
2
BREE
ZW
AYMPOE/
I
T
JAN
I
TORMAINTENA
NC
E/
STOR
AGERESTRO
OM
MEN
WOM
ENELEC.
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
RTRT MAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
SS/C
JSS/C
SELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRERISER
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHER
S
A(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
ELECTRICAL MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-0"
X
58
'
-6
"YOGA30'-0
"
X
17
'
-0
"CO-WORK20'-6
"
X
27
'
-4
"
LEAS
ING
25'-
0
"
X
32
'
-0
"RESTRO
OMOFFIC
E
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-
0"OFFICE11'-0" X
11
'
-0
"OFFIC
E
11'-0
"
X
11
'
-
0"OFFICE11'-0" X
11
'
-0
"BREAK
RM
.
11'-0"
X
1
6
'-
0
"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0
"
X
23
'
-0
"CONF.17'-0" X
1
3
'
-6
"CONF.10'-0"
X
1
3
'-
6
"PORCH19'-0
"
X
2
2'
-
0"#####
#
##
##
##
#
####
##
##
#
##
##
#####
##
##
##
##
####
##
##
#
##
##
POOL
EQU
IP
.
10'-3
"
X
15
'
-
0"
WC
WCSHOW
ER
S MAIL
UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENAN
TTRASHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANT
TRA
SHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOM
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGTURNAROUNDGGG1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485UPA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"24
49
B4B3A4B3 ABOVEA4A5A1B1A330"24
49
30"2449A3
A5A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRYA4A3A430"24 49
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORR
IDOR SERVICE CORR
IDOR
OPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49
A330"24
49
A3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3B3 ABOVE20PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY#############LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17B39LVLV30"24
49A3
A118A3 ABO
VE
A330"24
49POOLEQUIPMENTMAIL& PARCELS###########MEN WOMEN
B3
A
BOV
E
B3ALT 2B3ALT 1A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 2B4A5ALT 1LVA8T.B.D34 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS 14 18 134.8%7.2%
16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"24
49 ELECT. ROOMB
3
A330"24
49ELECT. ROOM32BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SF123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7
MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.CHURCH ST
.TMAINT.EXISTINGTERRA VISTA COMMONSRETAIL CENTERN.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATIONB-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXG-76-GARAGESG-628-GARAGESG-530-GARAGESG-422-GARAGESG-320-GARAGESG-224-GARAGESG-118-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDB-520-PLEXMAINT.WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-28351627348VIEW 5 "LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 580' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 6 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 470' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 8 "LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 690' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".VIEW 7 " LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 420' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".EXISTING TERRA VISTACOMMONS BUILDINGEXISTING McDONALD'SRESTAURANTB2.9WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS Page 206
48"22"BREEZWAY5'-0"ELECTRICALMPOEKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18RSS
SSKPKPKPELECTRICAL MA
I
N
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RS
S
D
S
/
C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
SKPSSSSSSUP18RUP18RS40'-6"SSDS/C SKP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPSSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKPKPKPELECTRICALUP18RSKPKPKP4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT4:12PER FOOT 4:12PER FOOT
43444647UP UP5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANTTRASHROOMRETAILTRASH RM5' DIA.TRASHROOMTENANTTRASHROOMC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGTURNAROUNDEND OFLOWER LEVGATECCCCCCCCCCCC1234567891011121415161718192021222324252930313233343536373839404142454849 50 51 52 53 54 55565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788899091929395969798991001011021031041051061071081091101111121131141151161171181191201211221231243.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"ELECTRICALROOMCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGCGGTURNAROUNDCGGUPTURNAROUNDA4A4A4A3A4A4A4A430"2449B4B3A4B3 ABOVE14'-6"TTA414'-6"A5A1B1A330"244930"2449A3A511'-5"A5A3A5ELECT. ROOMMAINT.SHOPA5A5BREAKFASTREST.3,700 SFDININGPATIO1,200 SFSALON NAILSSHOPMEXICANREST.4,600 SFDININGPATIO1,900 SFLOBBYPASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYPARKING ENTRY46'-3"91'-3"114'-3"A4A3A430"2449
PASSAGEWAYA1 ABOVEA3 ABOVEB3 ABOVE30"24
49PASSAGEWAYSERVICE CORRIDORSERVICE CORRIDOROPEN
OPENOPEN B4A5A5B1B3B1A5B330"24
49A330"24
49A3B3B1A5A5A5A1 ABOVEB3B3B3 ABOVESTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"20STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"PASSAGEWAYB4A1B3A5A1A1A1PASSAGEWAY1,077 SQ. FT.LOBBYFITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARD 16 17 13 13 15 17STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"MILLIKEN AVE.FOOTHILL BLVD.B3492'-8"
519'-7"
65'-3"123'44'-10"110'101'-7"74'-11"189'-9"221'-10"410'-2"58'-5"
27'-4"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8
"STOR.U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"S
T
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3
'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3
'-6"30"2449A3
28'-2"12'-4"A119'-10"19'-10"26'19'-10"19'-10"26'22'-10"12'-4"16'-2"27'-3"26'-9"30'25'14'-9"14'-1"13'-2"11'-6"17'-4"12'-5"13'15'-11"26'15'-5"29'-3"19'30'-4"31'-2"32'-2"19'187'
6'A3 ABOVEA37'30"2449POOLEQUIPMENTSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"7'MAIL& PARCELS966 SQ. FT.7'7'7'7'6'7'MENWOMENSTOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-4"
X
4
'
-0"B3 ABOVE
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"7'7'46'-2"46'-2"47'100'38'-8"58'-6"61'-3"75'24'-5"49'-8"49'-8"B3ALT 2B3ALT 17'7'A5ALT 2B4ALT 1B4ALT 27'7'B4A5ALT 1STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"LVA8T.B.D48"22"BREEZWAY5'-0"33 STALLSCOMMERCIAL PARKINGCOMMERCIAL 85 STALLSRESIDENTIAL40 STALLS12345678910111213141617181920212223242526272830313233 14 18 134.8%7.2% 16 15.6 12.5 17 16 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 16 18A330"24
49ELECT. ROOMB3A3
30"2449ELECT. ROOMSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4
'-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X 4
'
-0"STOR.UNIT3'-6"
X
4
'
-0
"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0
"
X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
3
'
-6
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X 3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0
"
X
3
'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"1529ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE ELECTRICAL MAINSERVICE MPOE KP KP KPKPKPKP ELECTRICAL PKPKPKPKPKPKPKPUP18RSS/CJSS/CSELECTRICAL MAINSERVICEMPOEKPKPKPELECTRICALKPKPKPKPUP18RSSDS/CFIRERISER
UP18RK
KP
SKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPELECTRICAL MA
I
N
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18RFIRE RISER
KPJSS/C
SSPATIOJSS/CSPATIO JSS/C KPKPKPKPKPKPELECTRICALMPOEFIRE RISER KPKPKPKP
UP18RKP KP
KP
KPUP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MA
I
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
ELECTRICAL
SSDS/C
S REF3DPCBSDS/CS222PRINTER222PRINTER 22PRINTER22PRINTER22 BREEZWAYMPOE/ITJANITORMAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMMENWOMENELEC.ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"LEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"RESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"####################################################WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSW W W WW
W
W
W
S
SWWW WWWWSSSS S S S WSSSSSSSSSS
WWF O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E . I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .S S S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W WSS SSSSW WWWWW71110G-711'-2"
M I7'26'28'-9"12'-9"19'-10"26'19'-10"19'26'23'-2"24'1161762626'32'-4"37'-11"19'-10"26'17'19'-10"26'19'-10"12'-8"26'-2"26'-9"15'-2"19'-2"15'-2"13'19'-10"26'19'-10"6'-6"17'-4"17'15'-6"3'
14'-5"
22'-6"22'-5"25'-4"30'21'-10"14'-10"17'-4"11'-1"13'-1"17'-5"14'-8"1411'-3"15'-9"17'-4"12'-4"11'-6"13'26'-10"26'22'-7"16'-1"1112423514'-6"28'-3"32'30'-4"331'-6"32'-6"1519'26'19'19'26'19'26'91222410'-3"422'-7"11'-4"8'-4"'5'5'1413'3'3'26'6'20'-2"26'5'-8"25'7B-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXG-76-GARAGESFOOTHILL BOULEVARDMAINT.24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.10BUILDING PLANWRAPNORTHWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283GROUND LEVELSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSFIRE WALLWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTPATH OF TRAVELR-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAXSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CFEXIT PATH Page 207
UPUP
5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUPA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A511'A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"RESIDENTIAL149 STALLSA4B3A4OPEN
OPENOPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"24
49A330"24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDLVSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8
"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA16'STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4B3ALT 1A5ALT 17'B3B3B4ALT 17'B3ALT 2A5ALT 27'7'7'A83'-2 15/16" 28 28 28 28LVSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.11BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283SECOND LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF Page 208
UPUP
UP5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A511'A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"A4B3A4OPEN
OPENOPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"2449A330"24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDLVSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0"
X
4
'
-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0
"
X
4
'-8"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA16'STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32B3ALT 1A5ALT 1STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"7'B3B3LVB4ALT 17'B3ALT 2A5ALT 27'7'7'A8 38 38 38RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS30"24
49A3B324'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTHWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283B2.12BUILDING PLANTHIRD LEVEL1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLPATH OF TRAVELR-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAXSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF Page 209
UPUP
5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMTURNAROUND123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"5' DIA.TENANTTRASHROOMGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRGGUPA4A4A4A4A4A4A4B4B3A46'14'-6"TB3A414'-6"A5A1B1B3A5A5A5A5A544'-10"91'-3"114'-3"A4B3A4OPEN
OPEN
A5A5B1B1A5B330"2449A330"24
49A3B3B3B1A5A5A5B3B3STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B4A1B3A5A1A1A1FITNESSCOURTYARDPOOLCOURTYARDSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"B3492'-10"
519'-7"
59'129'-3"44'-10"110'100'-2"76'-4"188'-4"221'-10"410'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X
4
'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0
"
X
4
'-8"
S
T
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"
ST
O
R
.
U
N
I
T
3'-
4
"
X
4
'
-
4
"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.U
N
I
T3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT4'-2" X 3'-5"9STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"LVSTOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"STOR.UNIT3'-3" X 4'-6"LVA1STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"STOR.UNIT5'-2" X 3'-4"207'7'7'7'6'7'30"
2
4
49
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"S1S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1A6 A6S1B3A3B37'30"2449A3B3B3A1LV
B3B3B3B3A1B4ALT 2B4B3B4B3ALT 1A5ALT 17'B3B37'A5ALT 27'7'7'ROOF DECK@4TH LEVEL1,788 SQ. FT.LVA8 48 48 48RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS30"24
49A3B3LVSTOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNITSTOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-2"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT32STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"11'OPEN24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'3'-6"4'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.13BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FOURTH LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDBUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHTSTORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)FIRE WALLSTORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF Page 210
ROOFTOPMECHANICALEQUIPMENTCONCEALED FROMEXTERIOR VIEW BYPERIMETER PARAPETWALLS (TYP.)ROOF ACCESS STAIRROOF ACCESS STAIRUPUP
UPTURNAROUND4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0"
UP RR R R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R R RR R R R R7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12
SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE 7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE 58 58 58RESIDENTIAL156 STALLSAC UNIT24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'NORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.14BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283FIFTH LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENINGWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED Page 211
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"TURNAROUNDUP
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRESIDENTIAL50 STALLS24'18'18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"± 53'-11"TOP OFPARKINGSTRUCTURE9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"3'-6"5TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.4TH STORYT.O. PLATE5'-6"LINE OF SIGHTNORTH1"=30'-0"30' 60' 90'0 15'B2.15BUILDING PLANWRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283ROOF LEVEL1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'PARKING DIMENSIONSWRAP APARTMENTSTYPE VAR-272,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDPARKING STRUCTUREOPEN PARKINGTYPE IBS-2UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDEDSECTION Page 212
REF34'-0"20'-0"BEDROOM10'-2" X 10'-6"BATHUNIT A11 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 634 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 56 SQ. FT.WICLIVING10'-4" X 12'-9"BALCONY8'-6" X 6'-6"KITCHEN9'-10" X 11'-8"ENTRYQDWW/DP36" x 60"LBUILT-INDESK36" HCBCB3S5 MDF SH.DWKITCHEN8'-0" X 15'-0"ENTRYW/DLIVING12'-10" X 16'-2"BALCONY11'-0" X 5'-6"BEDROOM11'-2" X 12'-0"REFPBATHLUNIT A31 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 759 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.25'-0"33'-0"WIC30"2449
LBUILT-INDESKKOCCURS UNDER 2 BEDROOMCBCB
36"x60" BUILT-INISLAND3S37'-11"29'-4"BALCONY9'-0" X 6'-2"BATHLIVING11'-11" X 12'-11"WICBEDROOM11'-0" X 12'-6"REFKITCHEN8'-5" X 14'-0"DWENTRY5 SHELVESW/DBUILT-INDESKUNIT A41 BEDROOM - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 751 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 68 SQ. FT.KPUNDER CABINET LIGHT36"x60" CBCBCOUNTERHEIGHTCABINETBUILT-INISLANDOPENIN
G
F
O
R
LI
G
H
T
COUNTER HT BASE CABUNDER
C
A
B
LI
G
H
T
3SDWKITCHEN10'-0" X 14'-0"W/D27'-0"34'-0"ENTRYBEDROOM11'-2" X 12'-0"LIVING11'-0" X 13'-8"BALCONY11'-0" X 6'-2"FLEX/OFFICE12'-4" X 7'-8"BATHREFWICUNIT A51 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 859 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 66 SQ. FT.DROP ZONEPCB CB K36"x60" BUILT-INISLANDFURNITURE
FURNITUREDWBATHCBCBPM. BATHM. BEDROOM11'-0" X 12'-0"WICLENTRYW/DLIVING11'-7" X 13'-0"BEDROOM 210'-4" X 12'-0"KITCHEN11'-8" X 9'-6"BALCONY5'-10" X 8'-4"29'-10"UNIT B1 (ADA)2 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 993 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 44 SQ. FT.FURNITURE44'-1"WICQREFQ36"x60" 36"x60" WORKSPACEFURNITURE3SCB
KITCHEN8'-0" X 15'-0"M. BATHWICM. BEDROOM11'-0" X 15'-0"LUNIT B32 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,133 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.36'-4"33'-0"DWCBENTRYD/WLIVING12'-10" X 15'-9"BALCONY11'-0" X 5'-6"BEDROOM 211'-2" X 12'-0"REFPBATH 2WICBUILT-INDESKDROP ZONE
STO.WORKSPACEKQL36"x60" 36"x60" BUILT-INISLANDFURNITURE3SLCOAT CLOSETCBCBDWREFPUNIT A61 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1.5 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1004 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.STORAGE : -ENTRYLIVING11'-10" X 15'-0"DWREPOSITIONABLEISLANDWREFBEDROOM14'-0" X 11'-2"BALCONY11'-0" X 6'-2"DININGLENTRYBEDROOM12'-0" X 12'-3"D/WLIVING11'-0" X 12'-0"FLEX/DININGFLEX/OFFICE9'-9" X 9'-6"UNIT S1STUDIO - 1 BATHNET LIVABLE: 659 SQ. FT.PATIO/DECK : 76 SQ. FT.STORAGE : -36'-10"50'-0"BATHBALCONY12'-0" X 6'-2"RETAILSHAFTWICBATHPDROP ZONE3'-10"KQDCBCBPP36"x60" P36"x60" FURNITUREFURNITUREFURNITUREW/D3SREFCBPCBM. BEDROOM 13'-0" X 12'-0"DINING9'-11" X 10'-6"LIVING14'-2" X 12'-0"BEDROOM 212'-0" X 11'-0"36'-0"ENTRYM. BATHWICLWORKSPACEDWKITCHEN12'-10" X 9'-0"BALCONY8'-0" X 7'-8"UNIT B42 BEDROOM - 2 BATHNET LIVABLE: 1,261 SQ. FT.WORKSPACEKQBATH 2LWORKSPACE36"x60" 36"x60" FURNITUREFURNITUREFURNITURE BUILT-INISLANDB3.0UNIT PLANS - WRAPS 3/16"=1'-0"4' 8' 16'0 2'1'4-STORY WRAPWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283 Page 213
Exhibit D
Page 214
Exhibit E
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-07-22JOB NO.: 19-043L7OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES Page 219
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-07-22JOB NO.: 19-043L8OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES Page 220
Page 221
Page 1 of 6
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA
Master Plan
04/27/2022
Exhibit G
Page 222
Page 2 of 6
SITE PLAN
N
Page 223
Page 3 of 6
DETAILED SITE PLAN
N
Page 224
Page 4 of 6
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN
Land Use Mix
N
Page 225
Page 5 of 6
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN
N
Page 226
Page 6 of 6
SUMMARY TABLES
SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
(Master Plan)
Density 36 DU/AC
Front Setback - Foothill Boulevard Public ROW 0’ to 23’
Front Setback – Milliken Avenue Public ROW 12’ to 20’
Front Setback – Church Street Public ROW 15’ to 23’
Front Setback – Elm Avenue Public ROW 10’ to 15’
Front Setback - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’
Interior Setback – West property line facing adjacent shopping center 124’
Interior Setback - South property line facing adjacent shopping center 56’
Distance Between Buildings Per Building
Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter
17.64
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of
sidewalk.
PARKING
Number of
Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit (studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 152
Multi-family unit (One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit (Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34
Commercial (Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
LAND USE MIX / UNIT BREAKDOWN
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
Studio 84 33 117
1 Bedroom 153 194 347
2 Bedroom 86 121 207
TOTAL 323 348 671
Commercial
Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
Page 227
I' I
Exhibit H
LEGEND
-�'HN,TO l(H,t,)((il,Vf!'ltAe,!C)#l6')
--rH10il!T06'MlDl!�T
Ill IUHt 6' TO IO' 1-1101! �T
-·-1-"WDl!'�T
•••••••• OTl-l8t �!IIUTY •l'ITl-1&
-""f&:l<.e,./\TI-1 '---------==
FOOTHILL BLVO,
-------------=--=--=--=-=--=------
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA N/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD, & MILLIKEN AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786 (909) 985-0971
;,---·
\
\
,\ \ I
FOO THILL
♦
' I ' I ' � <;:: I" ' "' I"'
,. I"'
'I
BLVO.
NORTH -• ., "' ,,.
WALKWAY CIRCULATION EXHIBIT
DATE: 01�7�22
JOB NO.: 19-0--43
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
144 NORTH ORANGE ST.. ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860
,,
L2 AO
Page 228
Page 229
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 29, 2022
To: Brian Jacobson, Lewis Management Corp
From: Spencer Reed, PE and Jason Pack, PE
Subject: Harvest at Terra Vista Parking Management Plan
OC22-0877
This memorandum presents the parking management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista (Project)
development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. This parking management plan was
prepared based the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.070.
Project Description
The Project is bounded by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard
to the south, and Church Street to the north. The southwest corner of this block contains existing
retail uses, including a fast-food restaurant, which are not part of the Project, but will be utilized to
meet the commercial parking requirements.
The Project comprises of the following land uses:
323 three-story walk-up dwelling units
348 wrap product dwelling units
20,841 sq. ft. of commercial space
o 8,590 sq. ft. of retail space
o 12,251 sq. ft. of restaurant space
The Project proposes to provide 1,310 residential parking spaces. The residential parking includes
spaces for residents and guests with the use of angled and perpendicular parking on internal drive
aisles, parking in private garages, and driveway spaces behind some of the garages. The Project
Exhibit J Page 230
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 2 of 9
provides the required number of residential parking spaces per the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Section 17.64.050.
The Project proposes to provide 85 commercial parking spaces in the lower level of the wrap
residential parking structure and 35 parking spaces in the surface lot adjacent to the wrap building,
with the remaining requirement of 37 spaces to be fulfilled by sharing surface parking with the
existing commercial development. The Project also proposes to implement a parking management
plan. Table 1 summarizes the proposed commercial parking supply for the Project.
The existing Terra Vista Commons commercial development, which is directly adjacent to the
Project site, consists of the following uses:
7,100 sq. ft. of retail space
2,790 sq. ft. of restaurant space
3,500 sq. ft. of fast-food space
It should be noted that all parcels of the existing commercial development have one owner. That
owner also owns the multi-tenant commercial building. The fast food restaurant has a separate
owner and a ground lease from the owner of the commercial center. The existing surface parking
lot operates as one large shared parking pool, the existing uses and the total parking supply are
considered as one development for the purposes of this analysis. However, it should be noted that
our observations indicate that the bulk of the non-utilized parking on the site consists of the exiting
spaces between the McDonalds’s building and the AT&T store, north of those buildings. The
existing surface parking lot contains 160 parking spaces.
Since the commercial use of the Project will have designated parking, and will be parked separately
from the residential uses, the remainder of this memorandum addresses the proposed shared
parking between the existing and proposed retail on the site.
Parking Required Per City Code
Table 2 summarizes parking requirements of the commercial portion of the Project and the existing
commercial development per the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050. As shown
in the table, a total of 157 parking spaces are expected to be required for the proposed Project’s
commercial use per the City’s municipal code. Additionally, a total of 91 parking spaces are required
of the existing commercial development.
Page 231
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 3 of 9
Project Shared Parking Analysis
A shared parking analysis was conducted using methodologies and assumptions provided in Shared
Parking, 3rd Edition (Urban Land Institute [ULI], 2020). The ULI sponsored a national study that
established a basic methodology for analyzing parking demand in mixed-use developments and
developed averages for parking rates by land use. The analysis presented in this memorandum
utilizes the data from the Shared Parking, 3rd Edition report.
The shared parking methodology establishes the base parking rate, parking demand reductions,
and hourly/monthly demand patterns for each land use. The overall parking demand is calculated
by considering the parking demand patterns and parking demand reductions (potential for non-
auto modes and internal capture) for each component of the project being analyzed. Information
regarding the parking rates, parking demand reductions, and parking demand patterns for the
Project and the existing commercial development is provided below.
Parking Rates
The shared parking analysis for the Project’s commercial use utilized the City of Rancho Cucamonga
parking requirements that were adjusted to match the proportions base parking rates for customers
and employees as determined by ULI. Table 3 identifies the parking allocation of customers and
employees and demonstrates that the parking requirement for the commercial portion of the
Project meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking requirement of 157 parking spaces. Table 3
also identities the parking rates developed for the existing commercial development which reflects
the 91 parking space requirement.
Separate rates were used for weekday and weekend and for customers and employees. The derived
rates use the daily/hourly/seasonal patterns for calculating the parking demand based on the
unique travel characteristics of the project being analyzed. Adjustments were made for two travel
factors to match the ULI shared parking methodology: the potential for non-auto modes and the
estimated non-captive (otherwise known as internal capture) of parking between the land uses in
the area (e.g. people from the on-site residential uses accessing the retail).
Parking Demand Reductions
The shared parking analysis allows for adjustment in the base parking rate due to factors such as
mode split/walk-in and non-captive ratio. These factors are based on the mix of uses in the project,
Page 232
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 4 of 9
size of the uses, and location of the project. Additional information regarding these factors is
provided below.
Mode Adjustment – One factor that affects the overall parking demand at a particular
development is the number of visitors and employees that arrive by automobile. The
alternatives considered in the analysis account for the effects of pedestrian, bicycle, drop-
off, and transit access to the site.
Noncaptive Ratio – Also known as trip internalization. Based on data from empirical studies
through sources such as ULI, it is known that a certain percentage of trips in mixed-use
developments (depending on the mix of land uses in the project) are trips moving between
the land uses on-site, i.e., they were internally captured on the site. Adjustments were made
to the analysis to account for trip internalization.
Table 4 documents the adjustment percentages applied to customers and employees to each of
the land uses for different periods of the day. Although Foothill Boulevard provides frequent transit
opportunities to access the commercial development and increased residential development along
the corridor will allow for additional pedestrian/bicycle activity to the site, we assumed no mode
split adjustment to reflect a conservative condition of all customers and employees driving to the
site. The non-captive ratio was applied based on the mix and size of the uses in the Project and
existing commercial development. These ratios were based on standards provided in Shared
Parking, 3rd Edition. It is assumed that some patrons will only park a vehicle once but visit multiple
components of the Project and existing commercial development.
Parking Demand Patterns
The shared parking analysis uses monthly adjustment factors and time-of-day adjustment factors
to account for the variation in parking demand for different land uses. Based on the anticipated
land uses and parking demand reductions applied, monthly adjustment factors are applied based
on the month that will result in the greatest parking demand (peak month). The time-of-day factors
are applied to the peak month demand to determine the estimated parking demand throughout
the day. Table 5 documents the weekday peak month adjustment and time-of-day adjustment for
customers and employees. Table 6 documents the weekend peak month adjustment and time-of-
day adjustment for customers and employees.
Page 233
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 5 of 9
Shared Parking Demand
Table 7 summarizes the shared parking analysis of the existing commercial development using the
methodology and assumptions described above. As shown in the table, an estimated peak parking
demand of 89 spaces (74 for customers and 15 for employees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00
PM in December. With inclusion of the Project an estimated peak parking demand of 240 spaces
(203 for customers and 37 for employees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00 PM in December as
documented in Table 8.
Table 9 and Table 10 present the estimated total parking demand distribution by each land use
category for weekday and weekend day, respectively. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show weekday and
weekend shared parking demand estimates for each month of the year. Demand for the month of
December is divided into “December” and “Late December”.
Existing Parking Demand
A parking survey of the existing commercial development was conducted during the evening of
March 10, 2022. Peak parking demand was found to be approximately 27 vehicles at 6:00 PM.
According to the shared parking analysis conducted for the existing commercial development, a
parking demand of 69 vehicles would be expected at 6:00 PM in March. The existing site parking
observations indicate half of the demand compared to what was estimated using the shared parking
methodology that was adjusted to reflect City parking code requirements. Therefore, it can be
assumed that the actual peak parking demand at 12:00 PM as determined in Table 7 could be lower
than the 88 spaces identified and provides a conservative assessment.
Parking Supply and Demand Conclusions
The shared parking analysis of the existing commercial development and the commercial portion
of the Project, utilizing City parking requirements, ULI parking demand reductions, and time-based
demand patterns resulted in a weekday parking space demand of 235 spaces and a weekend
parking space demand of 240 spaces. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.050, the Project would require 248 parking spaces (91 for the existing commercial
development and 157 for the Project). While the Project will provide less spaces than required per
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (120 proposed compared to 157 required), the site
commercial parking supply of 280 spaces (160 existing and 120 proposed) and use of shared
parking will satisfy the estimated parking demand.
Page 234
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 6 of 9
Although the shared parking assessment within the commercial portion of the Project indicates that
there will be sufficient parking provided, there is the potential for parking from the residential to
“spill out” into the commercial parking if parking for the entire site is not properly managed. As
such, we have provided the following parking management recommendations in the following
section that should be considered.
Parking Management Recommendations
The following recommendations are aimed to provide an organized and systematic parking
management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista while mitigating parking congestion in the site’s
surrounding neighborhoods. These recommendations should be continually reviewed/updated as
needed to maximize the efficiency of the parking facilities if necessary.
Commercial Parking Recommendations
Commercial Parking Locations
All commercial parking will be required to park on-site in designated spots identified for
commercial parking. These non-reserved parking spaces will be utilized on a first come first serve
basis. Commercial users are not allowed to park in residential or guest parking spaces and shall not
park in nearby neighborhoods. Even if residential and guest parking spaces are unassigned,
commercial users are neither allowed to utilize the unassigned resident parking spaces nor will have
access to any gated resident parking area.
Static Signage
Static signage should be installed within the Project site to guide vehicles to the associated parking
facilities. Signage should also be installed within the parking facilities identifying specific parking
spaces or identifying the facility as commercial parking for the Project or provides time restrictions
that prevents over-night parking within the commercial parking area. The installation of static
signage can inform visitors of their parking options and direct them to locations them may not
associate with the commercial component of the Project.
Assigning Parking Locations
Assigning parking locations to commercial employees could reduce demand on desired parking
spaces. Employees could be assigned to harder to find or further away commercial parking spaces
to free up closer parking spaces for guests. Additionally, assigned employee spaces could be
Page 235
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 7 of 9
strategically located closest to the residential uses to better management potential parking spill
over from the residential uses on the site.
Accommodating Transportation Network Companies
Providing dedicated pick-up and drop-off locations to Transportation Network Companies (TNC’s)
such as Uber and Lyft could reduce the parking demand. While the parking demand calculations
do not consider parking demand reductions due to alternative modes of transportation,
encouragement of TNCs through dedicated pick-up and drop-off locations could result in
customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Promoting Other Modes of Transportation
Encouraging the use of other modes of transportation such as transit, bicycles, and walking could
reduce parking demand. While the parking demand calculations do not consider parking demand
reductions due to alternative modes of transportation, encouragement of these types of
transportation options through improving transit stops, bicycle parking, or sidewalk improvements
could result in customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Residential Parking Recommendations
Resident Parking Location
All residents and their guests will be required to park on site in designated residential parking
spaces. Only residents and their guests with be granted access to the residential parking areas.
Guest Parking Location
Guest parking will be available on a first-come, first-served basis within the residential community.
With appropriate registration, guests will be allowed to park in any unmarked, unassigned
residential parking space. Guests are not allowed to park in commercial parking spaces and shall
not park in nearby neighborhoods.
Register Vehicles with Management
All resident vehicles will be required to be registered with building management as part of their
lease agreement. Only those registered vehicles will be allowed to park within the community.
Management staff will monitor the amount of resident parking spaces that are available. Units will
not be leased to tenants if a potential tenant has more vehicles than spaces allotted for their unit.
Page 236
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 8 of 9
Assigned Vehicle Parking
All resident vehicles will be assigned a specific parking spot that is numbered and reserved for the
specific vehicles use only. Parking spaces are assigned to one (1) specific resident vehicle only and
are not able to be shared with other resident or guest vehicles. If a tenant’s vehicle information
should change, it is the responsibility of the tenant to notify management in accordance with the
lease agreement.
Security / Monitoring
Management staff and security personnel will be on-site daily from 8am-2:30am to monitor and
enforce compliance with the requirements of the Parking Management Plan and the requirements
set for in the tenants’ lease agreements. Cameras will be also be utilized to monitor the parking
areas. Any violation of the parking requirements set forth in the tenants’ lease agreements will be
subject to towing, revoked parking privileges, and/or eviction.
Management staff will employ parking enforcement software to enforce parking rules.
Management staff will also review potential parking spill-over into adjacent areas through review
of security footage and/or site observations.
Maximum Number of Vehicles & Monitoring
A maximum total number of vehicles will be allowed per apartment, with the below requirements:
Maximum of 1 parking space for a studio or 1-bedroom apartment
Maximum of 2 parking spaces for a 2-bedroom apartment
The number of remaining parking spaces available at the property will be monitored during lease
up and stabilization. If there are not a sufficient number of available spaces for a potential resident’s
vehicles, a lease will not be executed for that prospective tenant.
Additional Parking Language
The parking rules will include the below requirements:
All resident vehicles must be registered with management
No unregistered vehicles shall be parked on site
Open parking shall be on a first-come, first-serve basis
Residents with an assigned parking space shall only park in that space, and shall not share
the parking space with any other vehicle
Page 237
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Page 9 of 9
Resident guests shall park on site, on a first come first serve basis in the open spaces
Residents and guests may have their vehicle towed at their own expense if they do not
have the appropriate parking permit displayed
Residents may be non-renewed if parking rules and regulations are repeatedly violated.
If a resident’s vehicle information changes, it is his/her responsibility to notify management
in writing in accordance with the lease agreement. Failure to do so could result in the
vehicle being towed at the owner’s expense.
Page 238
TABLE 1
PARKING SUPPLY FOR
HAVEST AT TERRA VISTA COMMERICAL USES
Location Supply
Parking Structure Lower Level 85 spaces
Surface Parking 35 spaces
Shared Surface Parking 37 spaces
Total 157 spaces
Page 239
TABLE 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING RATES
FOR PROJECT AND EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Parking Rate [a]
Use
Number of
Spaces Per Unit Total Size Unit
Parking Spaces
Required Per Code
Project
Retail [b]4 1,000 sqft 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Existing Commercial Development
Retail [b]4 1,000 sqft 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant [c]10 1,000 sqft 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
Notes
a: Source - Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.60.050
c: Identified as restaurants and lounges in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
b: As retail space is less than 25,000 sf, the space has been identified as offices, financial institutions, retail stores in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code
Page 240
TABLE 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING RATES FOR PROJECT
WITH URBAN LAND INSTITUTE CUSTOMER AND EMPLOYEE RATIOS
Use Customers Employee Total Size Unit
Parking Spaces
Required Per Code
Project Weekday Ratios
Retail 3.22 0.78 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant 8.76 1.24 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Project Weekend Ratios
Retail 3.20 0.80 8,590 sqft 34.36
Restaurant 8.77 1.23 12,251 sqft 122.51
Total 157
Existing Commercial Development Weekday Ratios
Retail 3.22 0.78 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant 8.76 1.24 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant 8.61 1.39 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
Existing Commercial Development Weekend Ratios
Retail 3.20 0.80 7,100 sqft 28.4
Restaurant 8.77 1.23 2,790 sqft 27.9
Fast Food Restaurant 8.64 1.36 3,500 sqft 35
Total 91
Page 241
TABLE 4
SHARED PARKING MODEL REDUCTION ASSUMPTIONS
Mode Adjustment Noncaptive Ratio
Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend
Use ULI Land Use
Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening
Retail Shopping Center
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%3% 5% 3%5%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
Restaurant Family Restaurant
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant
- Customer 0% 0% 0%0%18% 19% 19%18%
- Employee 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%0%
Page 242
TABLE 5SHARED PARKING MODEL MONTH AND WEEKDAY TIME OF DAY DEMAND ASSUMPTIONSPeak MonthTime-of-Day FactorsUse ULI Land UseDecember 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMRetail Shopping Center- Customer100% 1% 5% 15% 30% 55% 75% 90% 100% 100% 95% 80% 85% 90% 90% 85% 50% 30% 10% 0%- Employee100% 10% 15% 25% 45% 75% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 60% 40% 20% 0%Restaurant Family Restaurant- Customer100% 25% 50% 60% 75% 85% 90% 100% 90% 50% 45% 45% 75% 80% 80% 80% 60% 55% 50% 25%- Employee100% 50% 75% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 95% 95% 95% 95% 80% 65% 65% 35%Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant- Customer96% 5% 10% 20% 30% 55% 85% 100% 100% 90% 60% 55% 60% 85% 80% 50% 30% 20% 10% 5%- Employee100% 20% 20% 30% 40% 75% 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 60% 70% 90% 90% 60% 40% 30% 20% 20% Page 243
TABLE 6SHARED PARKING MODEL MONTH AND WEEKEND TIME OF DAY DEMAND ASSUMPTIONSPeak MonthTime-of-Day FactorsUse ULI Land UseDecember 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMRetail Shopping Center- Customer100% 1% 5% 10% 35% 60% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 80% 65% 60% 55% 50% 35% 15% 1%- Employee100% 10% 15% 40% 75% 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 85% 80% 75% 65% 45% 15% 0%Restaurant Family Restaurant- Customer100% 10% 25% 45% 70% 90% 90% 100% 85% 65% 40% 45% 60% 70% 70% 65% 30% 25% 15% 10%- Employee100% 50% 75% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 95% 95% 95% 95% 80% 65% 65% 35%Fast Food Fast Food Restaurant- Customer96% 5% 10% 20% 30% 55% 85% 100% 100% 90% 60% 55% 60% 85% 80% 50% 30% 20% 10% 5%- Employee100% 15% 20% 30% 40% 75% 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 60% 70% 90% 90% 60% 40% 30% 20% 20% Page 244
TABLE 7SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY - EXISTING COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENTULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK MONTH: DECEMBER -- PEAK PERIOD: 12 PM, WEEKENDQuantityUnit1 PM December 12 PM DecemberRetail (<400 ksf)7,100 sf GLA 3.22 100% 99% 3.20 ksf GLA 3.20 100% 99% 3.18 ksf GLA 100% 100%21100% 100%23Employee0.78 100% 100% 0.78 0.80 100% 100% 0.80 100% 100%6100% 100%6Family Restaurant2,790 sf GLA 8.76 100% 98% 8.58 ksf GLA 8.77 100% 98% 8.63 ksf GLA 90% 100%25100% 100%25Employee1.24 100% 100% 1.24 1.23 100% 100% 1.23 100% 100%4100% 100%4Fast Food Restaurant3,500 sf GLA 8.61 100% 91% 7.84 ksf GLA 8.64 100% 91% 7.87 ksf GLA 100% 96%26100% 96%26Employee1.39 100% 100% 1.39 1.36 100% 100% 1.36 100% 100%5100% 100%571 74151586898% 6%Shared Parking ReductionCustomer CustomerEmployee EmployeeRetailFood and BeverageTotal TotalProject RatioUnit For RatioPeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandPeak Hr AdjNon-Captive RatioProject RatioUnit For RatioBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioLand UseProject DataWeekday Weekend Weekday WeekendBase RatioDriving AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking Demand Page 245
TABLE 8SHARED PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY - PROJECT AND EXISTING COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENTULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK MONTH: DECEMBER -- PEAK PERIOD: 12 PM, WEEKENDQuantityUnit1 PM December 12 PM DecemberRetail (<400 ksf)15,690sf GLA 3.22 100% 98% 3.17 ksf GLA 3.20 100% 98% 3.14 ksf GLA 90% 100%45100% 100%50Employee0.78 100% 100% 0.78 0.80 100% 100% 0.80 100% 100%13100% 100%13Family Restaurant15,041 sf GLA 8.76 100% 99% 8.71 ksf GLA 8.77 100% 100% 8.73 ksf GLA 100% 100%131100% 100%131Employee1.24 100% 100% 1.24 1.23 100% 100% 1.23 100% 100%19100% 100%19Fast Food Restaurant3,500 sf GLA 8.61 100% 78% 6.73 ksf GLA 8.64 100% 79% 6.80 ksf GLA 100% 96%21100% 96%21Employee1.39 100% 100% 1.39 1.36 100% 100% 1.36 100% 100%5100% 100%5198 20337372352407% 5%Total TotalShared Parking ReductionCustomer CustomerEmployee EmployeeRetailFood and BeveragePeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandPeak Hr AdjPeak Mo AdjEstimated Parking DemandUnit For RatioBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioProject RatioUnit For RatioLand UseProject DataWeekday Weekend Weekday WeekendBase RatioDriving AdjNon-Captive RatioProject Ratio Page 246
Total Development (Sqft or Rooms) Land-Use6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Hour Parking Demand15,690 Retail2 4 11 21 37 50 58 63 63 61 53 55 58 58 54 33 20 8 0 5813,791 Restaurant42 80 96 116 131 137 150 137 85 73 73 117 123 123 123 94 85 78 40 1384,750 Fast Food23681523262624161516222113863238Total 44 82 107 139 179 209 234 227 175 152 142 186 204 203 187 132 106 84 39TABLE 9ULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK PARKING DEMAND DISTRIBUTION (WEEKDAY)448210713917920923422717515214218620420318713210684390501001502002506 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Parking Demand Distribution ‐WeekdayRetailRestaurantFast FoodTotalRetail, 58Restaurant, 138Fast Food, 38Peak Hour Parking Demand ‐Weekday Page 247
Total Development (Sqft or Rooms) Land-Use6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Hour Parking Demand15,690 Retail2 4 10 27 41 55 63 63 63 63 58 52 43 40 37 33 23 9 0 6313,791 Restaurant23 47 76 109 137 137 150 131 104 67 73 97 110 110 104 55 45 32 20 1374,750 Fast Food23681523262624161517232214963239Total 26 52 87 139 189 214 239 221 193 148 147 164 178 173 151 95 73 43 21TABLE 10ULI SHARED PARKING RATESPEAK PARKING DEMAND DISTRIBUTION (WEEKEND)265287139189214239221193148147164178173151957343210501001502002506 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 AMPeak Parking Demand Distribution ‐WeekendRetailRestaurantFast FoodTotalRetail, 63Restaurant, 137Fast Food, 39Peak Hour Parking Demand ‐Weekend Page 248
197197219212222216217219204212211235220050100150200250January February March April May June July August September October November December LateDecemberPeak Parking DemandWeekday Parking DemandFigure 1 Page 249
195195218210220215216217202210209240216050100150200250January February March April May June July August September October November December LateDecemberPeak Parking DemandWeekend Parking DemandFigure 2 Page 250
CHURCH
STREETFOOTHILL BOULEVARDELM STREET
MILLIKENAVENUE24'26'26'26'26'26'26'26'33'26'24'26'26'
24'26'26'26'26'26'26'44'44'67'
65'26'26'24'26'24'26'26'24'26'
26'
118'R=185' L=36'N0°08'55"W 252'N89°51'05"E 250'R=2934'L=176'N0°14'48"W
97'13 '6=2R=24' L=36'214'N89°51'05"E 126'N89°51'05"E55'N0°08'55"W 247'
=2 29R3L=14'N58°48'01"W26'R=3050'R'R=2938'L=39'N04°57'42"E4'=R196L=218'R=1044' L=34'N0°08'55"W 279'N05°43'09"E5'R=24' L=38'R=2936' L=21'N5°33'50"W 196'=0'L='N77°43'56"E4''4R=1516'L=159'R=192' L=37'R = 2931'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAS STATION(N.A.P.)LOT 4P.M. 15424(N.A.P.)PARCEL 3LOT 3LOT 2N89°51'05"E26'L=57'R=161'L=30'R=85'N89°51'05"E71'N01°41'24"E N00°08'55"W 32'N41°00'06"E N11°56'39"W 6'N78°03'21"E880'L=41'N83°58'58"W 136'L N85°35'40"E 5'84LOT 1N89°51'05"E 145'N89°51'05"E32'L=52'R=214'L=73'R=143'N89°09'59"E32'N87°15'01"E50'N89°01'22"E91'L=3'R=50'N0°00'15"E 211'R=20' L=11'R=47' L=61'N08°56'36"W 137'N78°03'21"E1052'N00°25'08"W17'L=30'L=156'526'526'INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)INGRESS / EGRESS(TYPICAL)60'N12°33'31"W29.80'EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST.
R
.O.W
.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.EXIST. R.O.W.PROPERTY L
INEPROPERTY L
INE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINELINEPROPERTY(5.69 AC)R=2938'(1.71 AC)(1.69 AC)(9.47 AC)50'94'60'127'
116'50'94'79'69'148'66'126'64'66'130'44'50'94'44'44'88'PROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.WATER PROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.SEWERPROP.WATERPROP.
STORM
DRA
IN
PROP.
STORM
DRA
IN PROP.
STORM
DRA
INPROP. STORM DRAINPROP.SEWERPROP.SEWER
DCULTIMATE
R
.O
.W
.ADDITIONAL5'DEDICATIONULTIMATE R.O
.W
.L=39'ULTIMATE R.O.W.(0.10 AC)EXIST. R.O.W.
ADD'LDEDIC.
VARIES
5'49'93'26'24'26'26'CL60'60'
120'
70'60'
130'
147.5'
125'
60'65'
22.5'
60'
142.5'DEDICATIONADDIT
IONALBVACATIONEXIST. R / W(0.10 AC)DEDICAT
IONADDIT
IONALB49'(0.01 AC)ESEE DETAIL"A" ABOVE50'66'
26.5'
117'
50'
67'VARIES139'70'69'(0.32 AC)DEDICATIONADDITIONALB(0.01 AC)EEXIST.
R
.O.W
. 6'5'1'R=3050'L=218'R=3049'L=217'N78°03'21"EN11°56'39"WN78°03'21"EULTIMATE
R
/
WEXIST. R / W VACATION32'N41°00'06"E 33'N41°00'06"E
AO ARCHITECTS144 NORTH ORANGE ST.ORANGE, CA 92866CONTACT:(714) 639-9860Email: @aoarchitects.comARCHITECTIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJANUARY, 202218.99 AC. GROSS TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20120BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1, 2, 4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP No. 15424, AS PER PLATRECORDED IN BOOK 191, PAGES 46 THROUGH 48 AND OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO.15455, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 191, PAGES 33 THROUGH 35, BOTH OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.18.56 AC. NETAPN: 1077-422-51,52,54,55 AND 1090-121-28(198 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)1. PRESENT ZONING: PC-TV2. LAND USE PROPOSED - MIXED USE3. THIS SITE CONTAINS 18.99 GROSS ACRES.4. THIS SITE CONTAINS 18.62 NET ACRES.5. THIS SITE CONSISTS OF (3) NUMBERED LOTS6. THIS SITE CONTAINS 2 LETTERED LOTS7. CONTOURS FROM MADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.DATED: 03/27/20208. SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT.9. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA TBD ACRES.10. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA TBD ACRES.NTSVICINITY MAPMILLIKEN CHURCHMAYTEN PROJECT LOCATIONELM FOOTHILLSTREETAVENUE
AVENUEEUCALYPTUSSTREET
AVENUEBOULEVARDSPRUCE
AVENUE
VERIZON1400 E. PHILLIPS BLVD.POMONA, CA 91766ATTN: JERRY PAUBELPHONE: (909) 469-6354SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.13525 12th STREETCHINO, CA 91719PHONE: (909) 613-1531UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 811SET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURBSTAMPED "CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA BM 10054 1987" AT N/ECOR. OF BASELINE ROAD & MILLIKENAVE., AT WEST END OF CATCH BASIN.NO. 10054ELEV.=1328.075UTILITY COMPANIESCUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT10440 ASHFORD STREET P.O. BOX 638RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729PHONE: (909) 987-2591SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY7951 REDWOOD AVENUEFONTANA, CA. 92336PHONE: (909) 820-5598 UNDERGROUNDPHONE: (909) 875-5100 TRANSMISSIONSPHONE: (213) 637-1233 PIPELINESPHONE: (909) 357-6233 DISTRIBUTIONCONTACT: ISAAC DOMINGUEZPHONE (909) 930-8576 EMAIL:isaac.dominguez@sce.comCIVIL ENGINEEROWNER/DEVELOPERMADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730CONTACT: MARK BERTONE(909) 481-6322 ext. 120Email: mbertone@madoleinc.comWDC COMMONS, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVEUPLAND, CA. 91786CONTACT: BRIAN JACOBSON(909)579-1214 OFFICEEmail: Brian.Jacobson@lewismc.comSITESCAPES, INC.3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVECOSTA MESA, CA. 92626CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS(949) 644-9370Email: rpolhamus@sitescapes.netLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEMADOLE&ASSOCIATES, INC.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAHARVEST AT TERRA VISTADATE: JANUARY 10, 2022JOB NO. 126-2647TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM-1HALF MEDIAN ---------------- 6'#1 EASTBOUND LANE ------ 11'#2 EASTBOUND LANE ------ 11'BUFFER ------------------------- 3'RAISED CYCLE TRACK ---- 7'URBAN SIDEWALK --------- 11'TOTAL LANE WIDTH -------- 49'CHURCH STREET 49' R / W DIMENSION STRING:DETAIL "A"SCALE: 1" = 20'4 NUMBERED LOTSJ:\126-2647\tentative\TTM01.dwg, 1/10/2022 3:20:20 PM, gbarronExhibit K Page 251
Design Review Committee Meeting
Rains Conference Room
AGENDA
March 15, 2022
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee was held on March 15, 2022. The meeting was called to
order by Mike Smith, Staff Coordinator, at 7:00 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Diane Williams, Tony Morales
Staff Present: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
B.Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and, after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 15, 2022.
Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented.
D.Project Review Items
D1. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN
AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master Plan and
construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of
commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55,
-98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074).
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote
Staff made a presentation to the Design Review Committee, followed by a brief presentation by the applicant
highlighting project amenities and operations. Both Design Review Committee members were very pleased
with the project design, the number of amenities, provided, and the project layout.
Committee Member Morales asked about the visibility of the parking structure over the residential wrap
building, and if this is a concern for staff. Staff noted that the parking structure protruding beyond the roofline
of the residential “wrap” portion of the building is a known issue. Staff requested that the applicant provide a
3D view depicting the parking structure. Based on these renderings, the parking structure visibility will be
very minimal. Staff noted that light standards will not be installed on the top level of the parking structure in
order to reduce its visibility. Additionally, a Condition of Approval will be added to screen a portion of the
Exhibit L Page 252
Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes – March 15, 2022
Page 2 of 2
Draft
parking structure in the event that the Planning Director determines that screening is required while the wrap
building is under construction.
Both Committee members remarked that the proposed project architecture is refreshing and unique for this
area. They both liked that the project was broken down into smaller blocks for easy pedestrian access, and
the fact that the project is publicly accessible. The Design Review Committee moved to recommend that
project as proposed to the full Planning Commission for consideration.
E. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill
Executive Assistant, Planning Department
Approved:
Page 253
Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/py8i3sb3fkd1uty/AABXm-kCUfZV-
FIJGAW8xk27a/WDCC%20Milliken%20West%20Residential%20LLC%20-
%20Section%2015183%20Compliance%20Memo?dl=0&subfolder_nav_tracking=1
Exhibit M
Page 254
Exhibit N Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Exhibit O Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Exhibit P Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
All off-site advertisement for the project is prohibited Citywide unless approval is granted by the
Planning Director.
1.
Occupancy for the walk-up product shall be limited to 65% (212 units) until a building permit has been
obtained by the developer and construction has commenced on the wrap building. Subsequently,
occupancy for the walk-up product shall be limited to 80% (294 units) until at least 50% of the
non-residential portion of the wrap building has been issued a building permit and is under construction.
2.
The project shall remain in compliance with the parking management plan at all times. In the event of any
observed parking violations to the parking management plan, the City reserves the right to require the
preparation of off-site, on-street parking restrictions such as, but not limited to, no parking signage,
time-limit parking signage, red curb, any necessary street repairs/improvements, or the establishment
of the parking district at the cost of the property owner/developer.
3.
Developer shall include photometric plans on the building plan check set, for Planning Department
review and approval. Please be aware that pedestrian level lighting along the project perimeter may be
required by the Planning Department during this time.
4.
The developer/contractor shall schedule a Planning Inspection when construction of the 4-story
residential wrap building reaches the roof sheathing stage to allow the Planning Department to verify
adequate screening of the parking structure has been achieved. The developer/contractor. shall also
conduct a height survey to verify the height of the parking structure and four-story wrap building is
consistent with the approved plans. As a result of the inspection and/or height survey, the Planning
Department may require additional screening and/or enhancements to minimize or reduce the visibility
of the parking structure from the public view, including, but not limited to structural additions, painting,
and/or installation of veneers along the edge of the parking structure, among others, in a manner that is
acceptable to the Planning Director or designee.
5.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the four-story wrap building, the developer shall provide
the Planning Department a recorded document that memorializes a shared parking agreement between
the project and the Terra Vista Commons shopping center located at the Northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Elm Avenue. The shared parking agreement shall specifically note the number of stalls
shared between the Terra Vista Commons shopping center and the project, per the project’s parking
management plan, and the parking plan sheet included in the approved plans.
6.
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/28/2022
Exhibit Q
Page 267
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections
shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent
nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included
in building plans.
7.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and /or commencement of the
approved activity.
8.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
9.
Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident
manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free
Multi-Family Housing Program.
10.
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs
and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such
action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. In the
event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The applicant shall
deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they
become due.
11.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 268
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .
Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the
Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined
in 17.124.020.D.
If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building
permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.
If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an
application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to
the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate
the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.
If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be
subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the
proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
13.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval.
14.
For multi-family residential and non -residential development, property owners are responsible for the
continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the
public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in
healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any
damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of
damage.
15.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
16.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval
prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics
of the selected tree species.
17.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per
30 linear feet of building.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 269
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design
shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.
19.
Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient
landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
20.
All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.21.
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and
exits shall be striped per City standards.
22.
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any
signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate
application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs.
23.
Unless exempt, directory monument sign (s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town
homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter
17.74.040 B-4)
24.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
25.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
26.
The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for
Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public
notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
27.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations,
and the Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan.
28.
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
29.
For multiple-family development, provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California
Green Building Code.
30.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 270
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
31.
A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles,
free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ., shall be utilized and be compatible with the
architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
32.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
33.
For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development
Code.
34.
A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800 ) prior to the issuance of Building Permits .
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
35.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
36.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has
commenced, whichever comes first.
37.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
38.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The existing ramps located at the street intersections shall be evaluated for conformance to current
ADA regulations. If the ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible
for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance . Design shall be completed and
improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map
whichever occurs first . The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior
to occupancy.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 271
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
2.
(DIF Fees):
Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per
the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest
these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be
delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period.
*Note that fees are subject to change annually.
3.
RCMU Electric:
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) shall be the electrical service provider for all project
related development. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and
shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and RCMU
requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RCMU’s
underground electric system is located off of the NEC of Milliken Ave and Foothill Blvd of the proposed
development.
4.
RCMU Fiber:
Fiber Optics
- Place 1-4” conduit structure (Mainline) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) at 18” depth from
demarcation location in the public right of way or utility easement dedicated specifically to the Rancho
Fiber project. This conduit system will be required to follow the joint trench distribution system within the
project where the conduit bank can be installed alongside the Telco and CATV conduits at the proper
communication depth.
- Place 1-2” conduit structure (Service) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) directly from mainline
pullbox to an 8” round plastic “flower pot” type telecom access box flush mounted to finish grade to serve
as a drop access point to city network directly at each individual residence. This drop conduit shall be
dedicated for City fiber drop installation only.
- An Optical network demarcation enclosure /panel shall be mounted on the side of the home, garage or
utility closet for the placement of a Fiber Optic Network Interface Device. Place a #6 solid ground wire
placed from network demarcation enclosure to power ground. If no power ground exists a 5/8” x 8”
copper clad ground rod is to be installed for ground wire to be connected.
RCMU’s underground fiber optic system is located off of the NEC of Milliken Ave and Foothill Blvd of the
proposed development. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on
the Street Improvement and /or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services
Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval,
whichever comes first.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 272
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
(In-Lieu Fees for Required Ultimate Improvements):
An in-lieu fee as contribution, along the project frontage of Foothill Blvd, shall be required for ultimate
public improvements per General Plan that are not constructed at this time. The fee shall be the
construction cost of the ultimate improvement items that are not built and subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
6.
(Traffic Signal Modifications):
Traffic signal equipment shall be relocated in accordance to City and Caltrans standard plans and latest
ADA requirements. Location of proposed equipment shall be determined during the plan check
process. A traffic signal modification plan and signing and striping plan shall be submitted for review
and approval.
7.
(Proposed Interim Vs. Ultimate Improvements):
The developer shall provide a Site Plan showing the proposed interim public improvements and a Site
Plan showing the ultimate public improvements.
The developer shall also provide design plans for the constructions of the ultimate street improvements
along Foothill Blvd, from the centerline of Milliken Blvd to the centerline of Elm Avenue. All public
improvement plans shall be provided for review and approval to the Engineering Services Department
prior to building permitting or final map approval, whichever comes first.
8.
The project Final Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of
Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved prior to issuance of Building Permits.
9.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted
on the final map.
10.
Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.11.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 273
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedications, street designs, and roadway typologies shall be made per new General Plan as follows
and on the following perimeter streets.
Foothill Blvd as a Boulevard,
Milliken Ave as an Arterial Roadway,
Elm Ave as a Collector Street, and
Church Street as a Bicycle (Class IV) Corridor.
Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
87.5 total feet on Foothill Blvd,
Varying total feet on Milliken Blvd,
44 total feet on Elm Ave, and
56 total feet on Church Street.
12.
All existing easements lying within future rights -of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final
map.
13.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.14.
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no
map is involved.
15.
Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be
recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
16.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be
installed as required by the City Engineer.
17.
Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from
the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 274
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www .cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
19.
Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond
the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map.
20.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts
shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of
Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
21.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans .” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
22.
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: Foothill Blvd, Milliken Ave, Church St, Elm Streets
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
Median Island
Bike Lanes
Cycle Track (Class IV)
Etc.
Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
23.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 275
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
24.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring .
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be
provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the
construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 276
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans
are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans.
Street Name: Foothill, Milliken, Church, and Elm
Botanical Name: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Common Name: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Min. Grow Space: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Spacing: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Size: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Qty.: To Be Determined during Plan Check
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
26.
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted
policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines
of sight plotted as required.
27.
All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of
Building Permits: Foothill Blvd; Milliken Ave; Church St; Elm Street.
28.
All public improvements (streets, drainage facilities, interior streets, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on
the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall
include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights,
and street trees.
29.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
30.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.31.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 277
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
32.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of
Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for:
33.
Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical
distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution
facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements
and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development.
34.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
Plans for the alarm and /or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
2.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
3.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
4.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 278
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building (s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and /or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
6.
Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded
to the Documents section.
7.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
8.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
9.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
10.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
11.
Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
12.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
13.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
14.
One or more of the systems, operations, processes, or pieces of equipment associated with this project
or the proposed business requires a Fire Code Construction Permit to be issued in accordance with
the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 279
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
16.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725xWyU-a?dl=0
17.
Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks
associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is required to be
implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of
foundation form materials. The Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan is required to be in compliance with
Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and
approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The
fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction
permits being approved and issued.
18.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
19.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
20.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
21.
A standpipe system is required to be installed in accordance with Section 905 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
In addition to the standpipe installations required by Section 905.3, standpipes are required to be
installed in the courtyards such that the entire ground floor of all buildings can be reached by a 150-foot
hose pull from the standpipes.
22.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
23.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
24.
Street address and building identification signage for multi -family residential buildings are required to
be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-7. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 280
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
26.
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road (s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road (s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
27.
Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention
plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated
fire apparatus access road (s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road (s) and the exterior
walls of all normally occupied buildings.
28.
A new public hydrant is required to be installed within 15-50 feet of the Fire Department Connection
(FDC) and in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10.
29.
The new connection to the public water main requires the submittal of public, off -site fire underground
plans that conform to the standards of the water purveyor and Fire District Standard 5-10.
30.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance
with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and
standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal.
The proposed structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC /CRC
NFPA 13, 13D, 13R and the Current RCFPD Ordinance.
Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA
regulations.
A two hour fire rated tunnel is required where the enclosed courtyard exits through the building at the
wrap building.
Baby changing tables are required in the Clubhouse restrooms as compliant with California State
Assembly Bill AB-1127 and the California Building Code.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 281
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical
plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV)
charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code,
section 4.106.4.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
8.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
9.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
10.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
11.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 282
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
13.
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations, the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Engineering Services Department Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad
Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils
Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
14.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan )
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
15.
Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
16.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on -site
storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water
surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All
reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific
drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality
management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
17.
Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway
culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit.
18.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
19.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 283
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
20.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of
the project Conditions of Approval.
21.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
22.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga ’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
23.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
24.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and /or approval of the project-specific
Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
25.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person /company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells /underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
26.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
27.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
28.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ’s “Memorandum of
Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or
any building permit.
29.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 284
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
30.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement (s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
31.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
32.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer ’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
33.
Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
34.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
35.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 285
Project #: DRC2021-00120 DRC2022-00074, SUBTT00024
Project Name: EDR - Harvest at Terra Vista (Design Review)
Location: 11220 FOOTHILL BLVD - 109012139-0000
Project Type: Design Review Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre -treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan
document.
36.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non -residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building
Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3.
37.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
38.
Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within
multi-family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The
private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the
private street/drive aisle centerline.
39.
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural /treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project ’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R ’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R ’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
40.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 20Printed: 4/28/2022 Page 286
Planning Department
Statement of Agreement and Acceptance
of Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2021-00120,
Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-
00074
I, Brian Jacobson, as applicant for Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074 hereby state that I am in agreement with and
accept the conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120
(SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074, for property located at the northwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -
39, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on April 27, 2022 and as listed below and attached.
Applicant Signature____________________________
Date ______________________________
Conditions of Approval
1.The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of
Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and
Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to
the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license,
and/or commencement of the approved activity.
2.All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 22-10 for Master Plan
DRC2022-00074, 22-11 for Design Review DRC2021-00120, and 22-12 for Tentative Tract
Map 20120 (SUBTT00024)
Exhibit R
Page 287
Attachment 2
Page 288
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.03-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF CHURCH AND ELMELM AVENUE Page 289
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"2449
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.13-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CHURCH STREET ENTRYCHURCH STREET Page 290
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KPKP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/CKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18RUP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KPKP
KPKPKP
KP
KPKPKP
KP KP
KP
KP
KPUP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKPKP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP KP KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
UP18RKPKP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP KP
KP
KP KPKP
KP KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KPKP
KP
UP18RKP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18RKP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2
2
2
PRINTER22
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER
2
2
PRINTER2
2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
UP18R
SS/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERSA(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP UP5' DIA.
5' DIA.END OFLOWER LEVGATEUP
30"2449
30"24
49
30"24
49
30"24 49
30"24
49
OPEN
OPENOPEN
30"244930"2449
30"24
4930"24
49
4.8%7.2%
30"2449
30"24
49F O O T H I L L B L V D .M I L L I K E N A V E .E L M A V E .C H U
R
C H
S
T
.C H U
R C
H
S
T
.M I L L I K E N A V E .F O O T H I L L B L V D .123456789121110G-2G-3G-4G-1G-6G-5G-7B-1237-PLEXB-1123-PLEXB-1037-PLEXB-720-PLEXB-623-PLEXB-320-PLEXB-423-PLEXB-837-PLEXB-923-PLEXB-137-PLEXB-223-PLEXB-520-PLEXA4.23-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-283CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND CHURCHMILLIKEN AVENUE Page 291
48"22"BREEZWAYFITNESS30'-0" X 58'-6"YOGA30'-0" X 17'-0"CO-WORK20'-6" X 27'-4"MPOE/ITJANITORLEASING25'-0" X 32'-0"MAINTENANCE/STORAGERESTROOMOFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"OFFICE11'-0" X 11'-0"BREAK RM.11'-0" X 16'-0"ENTERTAINMENT44'-0" X 23'-0"CONF.17'-0" X 13'-6"CONF.10'-0" X 13'-6"MENWOMEN5'-0"PORCH19'-0" X 22'-0"ELEC.2,515 SQ. FT.3,018 SQ. FT.1,532 SQ. FT.1,000 SQ. FT.A1.1CLUBHOUSE - RENDERINGSWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-2833FITNESS CORNER4LEASING CORNER2COVERED WALKWAYP
4
1ENTRYP3P2P1 Page 292
12345678963RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE15'-0"9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 54'-2"TOP OF ROOF± 57'-3" TOT.O. FIN1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1SOUTH ELEVATION2SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SE CORNER PERSPECTIVEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-19-22JOB NO.: 2019-2831WRAPB2.0ELEVATION - SOUTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8'23 Page 293
ROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGE123456789
3RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"10'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"12'-1"LOUNGET.O. PLATE± 51'-10"TOP OF ROOF1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1EAST ELEVATION1322NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3EAST PERSPECTIVEROOF LOUNGEROOF LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.2ELEVATION - EAST1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 294
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 51'-0"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"10'-11"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 53'-4"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCE1NORTH ELEVATION2NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE3NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132ROOF LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGEWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAPB2.4ELEVATION - NORTH1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 295
1234567893RD STORYT.O. SHT'G.2ND STORYT.O. PLATE2ND STORYT.O. SHT'G.1ST STORYT.O. PLATE9'-1"4TH STORYT.O. SHT'G.3RD STORYT.O. PLATE± 52'-3"TOP OF ROOF9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"4TH STORYT.O. PLATE± 57'-3"TOP OF PARAPET1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE2. STUCCO3. STUCCO TRIM4. VINYL WINDOW5. METAL GUARDRAIL6. METAL AWNING7. BOARD AND BATTEN8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING9. WALL SCONCEB2.6 ELEVATIONS - WEST1WEST ELEVATION2NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE3SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE132RESIDENT'S LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYGARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGERESIDENT'S LOBBYRESIDENT'S LOBBYWDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786(909) 985-0971144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866(714) 639-9860ARCHITECTS ORANGEHARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGADATE: 01-12-22JOB NO.: 2019-283WRAP1/16"=1'-0"16' 32' 48'0 8' Page 296
Page 1 of 6
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA
Master Plan
04/27/2022
Attachment 3
Page 297
Page 2 of 6
SITE PLAN
N
Page 298
Page 3 of 6
DETAILED SITE PLAN
N
Page 299
Page 4 of 6
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN
Land Use Mix
N
Page 300
Page 5 of 6
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN
N
Page 301
Page 6 of 6
SUMMARY TABLES
SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
(Master Plan)
Density 36 DU/AC
Front Setback - Foothill Boulevard Public ROW 0’ to 23’
Front Setback – Milliken Avenue Public ROW 12’ to 20’
Front Setback – Church Street Public ROW 15’ to 23’
Front Setback – Elm Avenue Public ROW 10’ to 15’
Front Setback - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’
Interior Setback – West property line facing adjacent shopping center 124’
Interior Setback - South property line facing adjacent shopping center 56’
Distance Between Buildings Per Building
Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter
17.64
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of
sidewalk.
PARKING
Number of
Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit (studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 152
Multi-family unit (One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit (Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34
Commercial (Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
LAND USE MIX / UNIT BREAKDOWN
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
Studio 84 33 117
1 Bedroom 153 194 347
2 Bedroom 86 121 207
TOTAL 323 348 671
Commercial
Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
Page 302
Attachment 4 Resolution No. 2022-049 - Page 1 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
MASTER PLAN DRC2022-00074, ESTABLISHING A MASTER
PLAN ON A 17.-2-ACRE SITE WITHIN THE MIXED-USE
URBAN CORRIDOR (MU-UCR) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
MILLIKEN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and
-39
A. Recitals.
1. The applicant, WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC filed an application for
the approval of Design Review DRC2021-00120 and Tentative Tract Map 20120, related
to a Site Plan and Architectural Review for the construction of a mixed-use development
comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space at the
northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The applicant also applied
for the approval of Master Plan DRC2022-00074 as described in the title of this resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Master Plan is referred to as "the application."
2. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
adopted Resolution Nos. 22-10, 22-11, and 22-12 recommending that the City Council
approve the Master Plan DRC2022-00074, and approving Design Review DRC2021-
00120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 respectively, and making findings in support of its
decision.
3. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened
a duly noticed public hearing for the application, conducted the public hearing, concluded
the hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution approving Master Plan DRC2022-
00074 and making findings in support thereof.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
A. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports,
this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
Page 303
Resolution No. 2022-049 - Page 2 of 5
a. The application applies to a vacant site located at the northwest corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue; and
b. The project site has an area of approximately 17.2 acres. The project site
covers approximately three-fourths of the city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west,
Milliken Avenue to the east, Church Street to the north, and Foothill Boulevard to the
south; and
c. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning
designations for the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-
noted site) are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR)
District
North Multifamily
Residential
Suburban
Neighborhood
Moderate
Medium High (MH) Residential 1
South
Shopping
Center (north
and south of
Foothill)
City Corridor High
Financial, Restaurants, Residential
(MFC)1 north of Foothill and Industrial
Park (IP) south of Foothill
East
Hospital/
Partially
Vacant
City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office
(MHO)1
West Shopping
Center
City Corridor High
Community Commercial (CC) District 1
1 – Terra Vista Planned Community
d. The application consists of establishing a Master Plan to regulate
development within the project site; and
e. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2021-00120 and
Tentative Tract Map 20120 related to the construction of a mixed-use development
comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby specifically finds and concludes as
follows:
a. The proposed Master Plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and
objectives of the General Plan. The Master plan will enable the construction of a mixed-
Page 304
Resolution No. 2022-049 - Page 3 of 5
use project that has been well-designed to align with the Corridor High designation. The
development proposes a density of 39 units per acre, which falls within the expected
range of the Corridor High designation of 36-60 units per acre. The site plan includes
proper building placement near the sidewalks with proper orientation to exterior or interior
streets to accommodate active frontages and ground floor uses. The strategic placement
of the buildings forms strong circulation patterns and streetscapes, helping create the
desired urban character of the Corridor. The project site also has the benefit of street
frontage on four sides and has taken advantage of those frontages to provide easy access
and strong connectivity. The site is divided into quadrants, using privately owned streets
to create walkable blocks in and throughout the project site. While the streets are privately
owned, they will be public accessible and designed to look, feel, and function like public
streets, as envisioned by the General Plan.
b. The proposed Master Plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in
Chapter 17.22.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The Master Plan allows
for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to allow the
development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing
zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards. The application
complies with all applicable requirements set forth by the development code related to
the establishment of a Master Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section
15183 Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment
based upon the findings as follows:
a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the
City’s General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was
designated for “City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development
at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential
development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section
15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions
that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead
Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program -wide mitigation
measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative
environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact
is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect
in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied
development policies or standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the
project solely on the basis of that impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the
City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High” land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the
Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family residential dwelling units and
337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed Project is fully
consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and would
Page 305
Resolution No. 2022-049 - Page 4 of 5
be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR is required for the proposed project. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or
environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning. Staff evaluated this
memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR certified as
part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than
previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required
to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, the City Council hereby approves Master Plan DRC2022-00074 subject to each
and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval attached to Planning
Commission Resolution Nos. 22-10, 22-11, and 22-12.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Page 306
Resolution No. 2022-049 - Page 5 of 5
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of May, 2022.
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of
said City Council held on the 18th day of May, 2022.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Executed this 18th day of May, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
Page 307
BY E-MAIL
May 18, 2022
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Member
Kristine D. Scott, Member
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: Elizabeth Thornhill
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us
David F. Eoff, Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
David.eoff@cityofrc.us
Re: Comment on Master Plan for Harvest at Terra Vista Project
(DRC2021-00120; SUBTT00024; DRC2022-00074)
May 18, 2022 City Council Meeting, Agenda item G.3.
Dear Mayor Michael, Honorable Members of the City Council and Mr. Eoff:
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
(“SAFER”), a California nonprofit benefit corporation, regarding the proposed mixed-use
development at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue,
located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, also known as the Harvest at Terra Vista
Project (“Project”). City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) staff have determined that the
project is categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental
documents pursuant to Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”). However, after reviewing the Section 15183 Compliance Memo prepared for
the Project, and the General Plan Update EIR that the Project relies upon, we conclude
that the Project does not meet the requirements for an exemption under CEQA Section
15183.
On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission for the City considered the Project.
SAFER submitted comments to the Planning Commission in writing and in person
arguing that the use of an exemption was improper. The Planning Commission
ultimately approved the Tentative Tract Map and Design Review for the Project, and
recommended approval of the Master Plan. SAFER timely appealed the Tentative Tract
Map and Design Review approvals and is awaiting a hearing date. As the City Council
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED: ITEM G3 - 5/18/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Page 308
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
May 18, 2022
City Council Hearing
considers approving the Master Plan, SAFER reiterates its comments to the Planning
Commission and respectfully requests that the City Council deny the Master Plan for the
Project and instead prepares necessary environmental documents under CEQA.
In support of its position, SAFER has attached its comments to the Planning
Commission on April 27, 2022 as Exhibit A and incorporates those comments herein by
reference.
Sincerely,
Amalia Bowley Fuentes
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
Page 309
EXHIBIT A
Page 310
BY E-MAIL
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: Elizabeth Thornhill
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us
David F. Eoff, Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
David.eoff@cityofrc.us
Re: Comment on Design Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Master Plan
for Harvest at Terra Vista Project (DRC2021-00120; SUBTT00024;
DRC2022-00074)
Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and Mr. Eoff:
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
(“SAFER”), a California nonprofit benefit corporation, regarding the proposed mixed-use
development at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue,
located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, also known as the Harvest at Terra Vista
Project (“Project”). The Planning Commission staff have determined that the project is
categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental documents
pursuant to Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
However, after reviewing the Section 15183 Compliance Memo prepared for the
Project, and the General Plan Update EIR that the Project relies upon, we conclude that
the Project does not meet the requirements for an exemption under CEQA Section
15183. SAFER respectfully requests that the Planning Commission deny the
applications for Design Review, a Tentative Tract Map, and a Master Plan, and instead
prepares necessary environmental documents under CEQA.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is a mixed-use development with 671 apartment units and
20,841 square feet of commercial space. It is bordered by multifamily residential uses to
the north, commercial uses to the south, a hospital and vacant land to the east, and a
shopping center to the west.
Page 311
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
II. LEGAL STANDARD
The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City
of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 (Bakersfield Citizens); Pocket
Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927 (Pocket Protectors).
The EIR is an “environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose is to alert the public and its
responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached the ecological
points of no return.” Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1220. The EIR also
functions as a “document of accountability,” intended to “demonstrate to an
apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the
ecological implications of its action.” Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of
Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392. The EIR process “protects not only the
environment but also informed self-government.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at
927.
An EIR is required if “there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record
before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment.” PRC § 21080(d); see also Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. In
very limited circumstances, an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a
negative declaration, a written statement briefly indicating that a project will have no
significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR § 15371), only if there is not even a
“fair argument” that the project will have a significant environmental effect. PRC §§
21100, 21064. Since “[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . . . has a terminal effect
on the environmental review process,” by allowing the agency “to dispense with the duty
[to prepare an EIR],” negative declarations are allowed only in cases where “the
proposed project will not affect the environment at all.” Citizens of Lake Murray v. San
Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440.
To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three-tiered
structure. 14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v.
City of Los Angeles (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1185-86 (“Hollywoodland”). First, if a
project falls into an exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in
question will not have a significant effect on the environment, no further agency
evaluation is required. Id. Second, if there is a possibility the project will have a
significant effect on the environment, the agency must perform an initial threshold study.
Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a). If the study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment the
agency may issue a negative declaration. Id.; 14 CCR §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070. Finally, if
the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact
report (“EIR”) is required. Id. Here, since the City exempted the Project from CEQA
entirely, the first step of the CEQA process applies.
Page 312
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions
of CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. 14 CCR §§ 15300, 15354.
“Exemptions to CEQA are narrowly construed and ‘[e]xemption categories are not to be
expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language.” Mountain Lion
Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 125. The determination as to
the appropriate scope of a categorical exemption is a question of law subject to
independent, or de novo, review. San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for
Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist., (2006) 139 Cal.
App. 4th 1356, 1375 (“[Q]uestions of interpretation or application of the requirements of
CEQA are matters of law. Thus, for example, interpreting the scope of a CEQA
exemption presents ‘a question of law, subject to de novo review by this court.’”)
Here, the City has issued a notice of exemption alleging that the proposed
Project is exempt from CEQA review under Section 15183. However, as discussed
below, this exemption is improper, and instead, a full CEQA analysis, such as an EIR,
must be prepared for this Project.
III. DISCUSSION
a. The City Incorrectly Applied CEQA’s Section 15183 Categorical
Exemption to the Project and Thus a Full CEQA Analysis is Required.
Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act allows a project to
avoid environmental review if it is “consistent with the development density established
by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was
certified . . . except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-
specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” 14 CCR
15183 (emphasis added). The intention of this section is to “streamline[]” CEQA review
for projects and avoid the preparation of repetitive documents. While this section is
considered an exemption from CEQA, environmental review is still required for various
types of impacts, including those “peculiar to the project or parcel on which the project
would be located,” those which “were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR,”
“are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not
discussed in the prior EIR,” or “[a]re previously identified significant effects which, as a
result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was
certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the
prior EIR.”
Section (f) of the exemption states that a Project’s environmental effects are not
peculiar to a project if “uniformly applied development policies or standards have been
previously adopted” which serve to mitigate environmental impacts, “unless
substantial new information shows that the policies or standards will not
substantially mitigate the environmental effect.” (Emphasis added). The standard
set forth by the statute for this analysis is substantial evidence.
Page 313
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
Here, there is substantial evidence demonstrating that the Project will have
significant impacts which were not addressed in EIR prepared for the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Update (“GPU EIR”). The Section 15183 Exemption therefore
does not apply, and the City must prepare appropriate CEQA documents for this
Project.
b. The City Must Prepare a CEQA Document or Adopt a Statement of
Overriding Considerations With Regard to This Project.
The GPU EIR concluded that several of the impacts identified as a result of the
General Plan Update project were significant and unavoidable. These impacts included
air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas, and noise impacts. In the Section
15183 Compliance Memo prepared for the Project (“Compliance Memo”), the City
acknowledges these significant and unavoidable impacts, but states that “because the
proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts to the
environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed as part of the GPU
EIR, no additional environmental review is required for the proposed Project beyond the
analysis and conclusions provided in Subsection 4.2 [of the Compliance Memo].”
Compliance Memo, p. 17. This conclusion is incorrect.
In the case of Communities for a Better Environment v. Cal. Resources
Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 122-125, the court of appeal held that when a “first
tier” EIR admits a significant, unavoidable environmental impact, then the agency must
prepare second tier EIRs for later projects to ensure that those unmitigated impacts are
“mitigated or avoided.” Id. citing CEQA Guidelines §15152(f)). The court reasoned that
the unmitigated impacts were not “adequately addressed” in the first tier EIR since they
were not “mitigated or avoided.” Id. Thus, significant effects disclosed in first tier EIRs
will trigger second tier EIRs unless such effects have been “adequately addressed,” in a
way that ensures the effects will be “mitigated or avoided.” Id. Such a second tier EIR is
required, even if the impact still cannot be fully mitigated and a statement of overriding
considerations will be required. The court explained, “The requirement of a statement of
overriding considerations is central to CEQA’s role as a public accountability statute; it
requires public officials, in approving environmentally detrimental projects, to justify their
decisions based on counterbalancing social, economic or other benefits, and to point to
substantial evidence in support.” Id. at 124-125.
Thus, since the GPU EIR admitted numerous significant, unmitigated impacts, a
second tier EIR is now required to determine if mitigation measures can now be
imposed to reduce or eliminate those impacts. If the impacts still remain significant and
unavoidable, a statement of overriding considerations will be required.
Page 314
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
c. The Project Will Have Project-Specific Significant Effects Which
Were Not Addressed in the GPU EIR.
The City prepared a Program EIR for the General Plan Update, which is allowed
under CEQA Guidelines § 15168(a). However, “[t]hat CEQA contains provisions for
subsequent and supplemental EIRs reflects the Legislature's recognition that the need
for environmental review may arise after the certification of a final EIR and the adoption
of the [] plan to which it relates.” Eller Media Co. v. Community Redevelopment Agency
(2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 25, 43. This possibility of further review is made more certain if
“the final EIR for the Project explicitly state[s] that future review would be required.” Id.
The GPU EIR states on numerous occasions that further review is warranted or
necessary to evaluate impacts specific to individual projects. The City may not now
avoid the consideration of the current Project’s impacts by claiming they were
adequately assessed in the GPU EIR. The City must prepare an EIR to assess those
project-specific impacts which were not evaluated in the GPU EIR.
i. Air Quality
The GPU EIR’s Air Quality section states that “[i]ndividual projects may require
project-specific mitigation measures to ensure compliance with regulations governing air
quality” and that “the extent of construction activities is unknown at this time.” GPU EIR,
p. 5.3-1. Later on in that section, the GPU EIR states that “[a]s discussed previously,
specific construction phasing and intensity are unknown. The levels of emissions
generated through these activities would depend on the characteristics of individual
future development projects under the General Plan Update, including the size and type
of land uses being developed, which would determine the length and intensity of
construction activity.” Id. at 5.3-52. The GPU EIR ultimately concludes that certain air
quality impacts will be significant and unavoidable. Id. at 5.3-65-66.
For the currently proposed Project, the Compliance Memo states that because
the Project will result in a net reduction of 8,390 vehicle trips per day compared to what
was evaluated for the site in the GPU EIR, the Project will have reduced air quality
emissions. Compliance Memo, p. 25-26. Additionally, the Compliance Memo states that
construction activities will adhere to SCAQMD strategies and emissions control
strategies in the GPU EIR and the City’s Climate Action Plan, and will therefore also be
less than significant. Id. at 26.
The City has avoided full evaluation of Project air quality impacts at both stages.
Emissions for the proposed Project must be modeled using a program such as
CalEEMod, and project-specific input parameters must be measured against applicable
thresholds. Further, a screening-level HRA must be prepared to determine the risk
posed to nearby residential receptors, as well as propose mitigation as necessary. If the
Project’s criteria air pollutant and/or toxic air contaminant emissions exceed the relevant
Page 315
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
SCAQMD thresholds, the Project’s greenhouse gas emissions must also be modeled
using a program such as CalEEMod and mitigation must be implemented if necessary.
These considerations all represent potential project-specific significant effects that were
not addressed in a GPU EIR, therefore the City must prepare an EIR for the Project.
ii. Biological Resources
With regard to biological resources, the GPU EIR states that “. . . future
development projects could require more detailed evaluations of biological resources
and formulation of mitigation measures by a qualified biologist.” GPU EIR, p. 5.4-61. It
ultimately concludes that biological resource impacts are significant and unavoidable,
and are considered cumulatively considerable. Id. at 5.4-65-66.
As part of its Compliance Memo, the City commissioned a Habitat Assessment
(“HA”), which was conducted in January 2022. Compliance Memo, Attachment A,
Habitat Assessment Update. The HA concludes that the findings from a previous
Habitat Assessment of the site remain the same and that no changes to onsite habitats
have occurred. HA, p. 4. However, the Compliance Memo states that “the field
investigation was not conducted during the blooming season for the majority of the
special-status plant species known to occur in the general vicinity of the Project site.”
Compliance Memo, p. 30. Although the Compliance Memo states that the species are
“presumed to be absent from the Project site” based on habitat requirements for
species, the timing of the HA field survey is inappropriate. Id. The Compliance Memo’s
conclusion that impacts to biological resources are less than significant is therefore
unfounded, and an EIR must be prepared in which these impacts are adequately
analyzed.
iii. Energy
The GPU EIR’s analysis of Energy impacts states that “compliance with the
Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen and implementation of proposed
energy-related policies to guide development of land uses accommodated under the
General Plan Update would help minimize nonrenewable energy demands by
increasing energy efficiency and renewable energy use.” GPU EIR, p. 5.6-10. The GPU
EIR therefore concludes that energy impacts would be less than significant. Id. at 5.6-
12. The Compliance Memo relies on these same standards to conclude that the
Project’s energy impacts would be less than significant. Compliance Memo, p. 44.
The standard under CEQA is whether the Project would result in wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Failing to undertake “an
investigation into renewable energy options that might be available or appropriate for a
project” violates CEQA. California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland (2014)
225 Cal.App.4th 173, 213. Energy conservation under CEQA is defined as the "wise
and efficient use of energy.” CEQA Guidelines, app. F, § I. The “wise and efficient use
Page 316
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
of energy” is achieved by “(1) decreasing overall per capita energy consumption, (2)
decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil, and (3) increasing
reliance on renewable energy resources.” Id.
Noting compliance with the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards
(Cal.Code Regs., tit. 24, part 6 (Title 24) does not constitute an adequate analysis of
energy. Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of Ukiah (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 256, 264-
65. Similarly, the court in City of Woodland held unlawful an energy analysis that relied
on compliance with Title 24, that failed to assess transportation energy impacts, and
that failed to address renewable energy impacts. California Clean Energy Committee v.
City of Woodland, 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 209-13. As such, the Compliance Memo’s
reliance on Title 24 compliance does not satisfy the requirements for an adequate
discussion of the Project’s energy impacts.
As for the “energy-related policies” referred to by the GPU EIR, they consist of
vague statements which do not commit the specific Project to implement anything.
Indeed, at the beginning of the Compliance Memo’s section on energy, it states that
“[t]he GPU EIR did not identify any standard COAs to reduce energy consumption.”
Compliance Memo, p. 42. This further demonstrates that the City has not proposed
anything beyond Title 24 adherence to render energy impacts less than significant.
The Compliance Memo states that the Project’s energy demands would be less
than those assumed in the GPU EIR, and would therefore be less than significant.
Compliance Memo, p.42-44. However, there is no discussion of the project's cost
effectiveness in terms of energy requirements. There is no discussion of energy
consuming equipment and processes that will be used during the construction or
operation of the project. The project's energy use efficiencies by amount and fuel type
for each stage of the project including construction and operation were not identified.
The effect of the project on peak and base period demands for electricity has not been
addressed. As such, the Compliance Memo’s conclusions are unsupported by the
necessary discussions of the Project’s energy impacts under CEQA. An EIR must be
prepared to assess these impacts.
iv. Greenhouse Gases
The GPU EIR states that the GPU project would not meet the City’s and State’s
long-term GHG reduction goals. GPU EIR, p. 5.8-42. Specifically, it states that “. . . the
strategies in the CAP, if fully implemented, would achieve a total reduction of 199,709
MTCO2e by 2040. These reductions place the City’s post-2030 communitywide
emissions on a downward trajectory that makes substantial progress toward the City’s
and the State’s long-term GHG reduction goals, but they are not sufficient to achieve
the 339,478 MTCO2e of reductions needed to achieve the City’s 2040 emissions
reduction target.” Id. Greenhouse gas impacts are therefore considered significant and
unavoidable, and the GPU EIR says there are no feasible mitigation measures.
Page 317
Comment re: Harvest at Terra Vista Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing
The Compliance Memo fails to address this failure of the GPU EIR to meet the
State’s long-term GHG emission reduction goals beyond listing it as a GPU EIR finding.
Compliance Memo, p. 52. As part of its assessment, the City completes a Climate
Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist, but the GPU EIR itself stated that even
compliance with this was insufficient to meet City and State GHG reduction goals.
Compliance Memo, Attachment E, CAP Consistency Checklist. There are numerous
measures beyond those included in the CAP which would help reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and the City must consider all feasible measures before simply concluding
that impacts are significant and unavoidable. The City must prepare an EIR which
adequately assesses greenhouse gas impacts and mitigation measures.
IV. CONCLUSION
In light of the above comments, the City must prepare an EIR for the Project and
the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with
CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments.
Sincerely,
Amalia Bowley Fuentes
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
Page 318
May 18, 2022
Via email
Hon. Mayor Michael and Hon. City Councilmembers
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
David Eoff
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Hon. Mayor Michael, Hon. Members of the City Council, and Mr. Eoff:
We represent WDCC Milliken West Residential LLC, the applicant of the Harvest at
Terra Vista project (Project). We are in receipt of Lozeau Drury’s letter, dated today, forwarding
the letter they submitted to the Planning Commission on April 27, 2022. The April 27 letter
challenges the City’s determination that the Project complies with the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15183. Section 15183 applies to projects that are
consistent with existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was
previously certified. The materials for tonight’s meeting include the Harvest at Terra Vista –
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance memo (“Compliance Memo”), prepared by T&B
Planning, including several reports, that analyzes the project’s impacts and compliance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. A second memo is in the materials from the City’s consultant
Placeworks, Harvest at Terra Vista Section 15183 Compliance Review memo which peer
reviewed the Compliance Memo. Placeworks’ peer review concluded:
The Compliance document, and supporting materials, provide a thorough review of the
General Plan EIR (SCH#2021050261) and accurately depict the assumptions made in the
General Plan EIR for this area of the City. The Compliance analysis also demonstrates
that the proposed project complies with the provisions of Section 15183 of the CEQA
Guidelines that direct when the City should require additional environmental analysis.
Nothing in the provided materials or the supporting technical studies, suggests that
additional analysis is warranted, and supports the contention that there is nothing peculiar
to the project or the site that would preclude the City from considering the project
consistent with the General Plan EIR.
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL ITEM G3 - 05/18/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Page 319
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
May 18, 2022
Page 2
I have attached hereto the letter we submitted to the Planning Commission on April 27
that explains the City’s analysis under Guidelines Section 15183 and responds to each of the four
substantive issues raised in Lozeau Drury’s April 27 letter.
I will attend tonight’s hearing as part of the WDCC Milliken West Residential LLC team
and am happy to address any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Amanda Monchamp
Attachment:
Monchamp Meldrum LLP, Response to Lozeau Drury April 27 Letter
Page 320
April 27, 2022
Via email
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
David Eoff
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and Mr. Eoff:
We represent WDCC Milliken West Residential LLC, the applicant of the Harvest at
Terra Vista project (Project). We are in receipt of Lozeau Drury’s letter, dated today,
challenging the City’s determination that the Project complies with the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15183. Section 15183 applies to projects that are
consistent with existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was
previously certified. The materials for tonight’s meeting include the Harvest at Terra Vista –
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance memo (“Compliance Memo”), prepared by T&B
Planning, including several reports, that analyzes the project’s impacts and compliance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. A second memo is in the materials from the City’s consultant
Placeworks, Harvest at Terra Vista Section 15183 Compliance Review memo which peer
reviewed the Compliance Memo. Placeworks’ peer review concluded:
The Compliance document, and supporting materials, provide a thorough review of the
General Plan EIR (SCH#2021050261) and accurately depict the assumptions made in the
General Plan EIR for this area of the City. The Compliance analysis also demonstrates
that the proposed project complies with the provisions of Section 15183 of the CEQA
Guidelines that direct when the City should require additional environmental analysis.
Nothing in the provided materials or the supporting technical studies, suggests that
additional analysis is warranted, and supports the contention that there is nothing peculiar
to the project or the site that would preclude the City from considering the project
consistent with the General Plan EIR.
Page 321
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Page 2
This letter responds to the allegations made in Lozeau Drury’s letter, which are
inaccurate and inconsistent with the analysis in the peer-reviewed Compliance Memo. Notably,
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 is not a categorical exemption thus Lozeau Drury’s citations (at
page 3) to case law regarding categorical exemptions being narrowly construed are inapplicable.
Moreover, the statement the City has issued a Notice of Exemption is incorrect.
Lozeau Drury’s letter is correct that CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 streamlines the
environmental review of projects that are “zoned to accommodate a particular density of
development or has been designated in a community plan to accommodate a particular
density of development and an environmental impact report was certified for that zoning
or planning action.” The purpose of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 is to reduce the need to
prepare repetitive environmental studies. For projects that meet the requirements of Section
15183, the Lead Agency is required to limit its examination of environmental effects to those
effects which the Lead Agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis:
(1) Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located;
(2) Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan,
or community plan with which the project is consistent;
(3) Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not
discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning
action; or
(4) Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new
information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to
have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.
CEQA Guidelines section 15183 was promulgated on the authority of Public Resources
Code section 21083.3, which provides that “[i]f a parcel has been zoned to accommodate a
particular density of development or has been designated in a community plan to accommodate a
particular density of development and an environmental impact report was certified for that
zoning or planning action, the application of this division to the approval of any subdivision map
or other project that is consistent with the zoning or community plan shall be limited to effects
upon the environment which are peculiar to the parcel or to the project and which were not
addressed as significant effects in the prior environmental impact report, or which substantial
new information shows will be more significant than described in the prior environmental impact
report.” (Pub. Resources Code, § 21083.3(a); see Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport
Land Use Com. (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 389.
Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to
the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially
mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards, as
contemplated by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c), then an additional EIR need not be
prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
Page 322
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Page 3
15183(h), an environmental effect shall not be considered peculiar to the project or parcel solely
because no uniformly applied development policy or standard is applicable to it. Section
15183(e) allows for the analysis to be limited for those significant environmental effects which
were previously identified in the prior EIR, and for which all applicable mitigation measures
identified by the prior EIR are found to be feasible. For such effects, the Lead Agency is required
to make a finding at a public hearing as to whether the feasible mitigation measures will be
undertaken.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(f), an effect of a project on the environment
shall not be considered peculiar to the project or the parcel if uniformly applied development
policies or standards have been previously adopted by the city or county with a finding that the
development policies or standards will substantially mitigate that environmental effect when
applied to future projects, unless substantial new information shows that the policies or standards
will not substantially mitigate the environmental effect. The finding shall be based on substantial
evidence which need not include an EIR.
The Lozeau Drury letter cites to Communities for a Better Environment v. Cal. Resources
Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 122-125, which invalidated certain CEQA Guidelines,
notably not CEQA Guidelines 15183. The letter also cites Eller Media Co. v. Community
Redevelopment Agency (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 25, 43, quoting that the need for environmental
review may arise after certification of an EIR. The letter claims because the GP EIR found some
impacts to be significant and unavoidable and that because the GP EIR contemplated that some
projects would require further review that a second tier EIR is required for this Project.
However, neither of those cases addressed CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 in any way. The fact
that the GP EIR found some impacts to be significant and unavoidable and said some additional
CEQA review would occur for some individual projects does not necessitate this Project to be
reviewed in a second tier EIR.
Air Quality
As described in the Compliance Memo, the Project is located within the South Coast Air
Basin (SCAB) and will comply with all Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) adopted by the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The General Plan EIR estimated
potential construction-related impacts using the CAlEEMod based on an assumed constant rate
of construction activities during implementation of the General Plan. Contrary to commenter’s
claims, there is no specific method of analysis required for air quality under Guidelines Section
15183. Nonetheless, further contrary to commenter’s claims, the GPU EIR did utilize
CalEEMod to model emissions for the GPU. As noted in the GPU EIR Air Quality analysis,
“[m]aximum daily emissions were generated using CalEEMod default outputs for the first
possible year of construction, which would be 2022.” GPU EIR, p. 5.3-46. “Operational
emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors were also estimated using CalEEMod.” GPU
EIR, p. 5.3-47. The Project was anticipated in the General Plan and is well within the daily
construction assumptions anticipated in the General Plan EIR analysis for typical construction
activities.
Page 323
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Page 4
As indicated in Table 3 of the Compliance Memo, Trip Generation Comparison, the
Project would result in a reduction in the amount of traffic generated by development of the site
as compared to what was evaluated by the GPU EIR. Specifically, the Project would result in a
net reduction of 8,390 vehicular trips per day as compared to what was evaluated for the Project
site in the GPU EIR. A majority of the Project’s air quality emissions would result from
vehicular traffic. Thus, because the Project would result in a reduction in the amount of traffic
generated by the development of the Project site as comprised to what was assumed by the GPU
EIR, it can be concluded that the proposed Project would result in a reduction in air quality
emissions as compared to what was evaluated and disclosed by the GPU EIR for the Project site.
In addition, construction activities associated with the Project would adhere to emissions control
strategies established by the SCAQMD and assumed in the AQMP, as well as the emission
control strategies included in the GPU and the City’s Climate Action Plan.
Further, the General Plan EIR addressed construction near sensitive receptors and
determined that the temporary exposure to diesel PM would be less than significant. The Project
would implement the required mitigation measures and would comply with applicable
regulations addressing reduction of pollutants during construction. The Project would not involve
any construction activities peculiar to the project site or the Project that would require additional
Project-specific analysis. As for operations, the GPU EIR addresses health risk impacts by
specifying that “[t]he City would avoid locating new development with sensitive receptors within
500 feet of a freeway or roadway with over 100,000 AADT. If avoidance is not feasible,
development with sensitive receptors may be located within 500 feet of a major roadway only if
the applicant first prepares a project-specific HRA addressing potential health risks to sensitive
receptors from exposure to TAC emissions.” Here, the largest roadway within 500 feet is
Foothill Boulevard, which only has 30,000-40,000 ADT. GP EIR, Table 5.17-2. Therefore, the
GP EIR evaluated this impact and the Project is sited such that an HRA is not required.
Biological Resources
The potential for the Project site to support sensitive plant species was addressed in the
February 2018 Habitat Assessment, and again in the February 2022 Habitat Assessment. Each of
the Habitat Assessments determined that the project site does not provide suitable habitat for any
of the special-status plant species known to occur in the area. As noted in the 2018 Habitat
Assessment and 2022 Habitat Assessment Update, the project site has been subject to a variety of
anthropogenic disturbances including on-going disking/weed abatement activities, stockpiling of
soils, and activities associated with the surrounding developments. A stockpile of undocumented
fill is present on the western and central portion of the site that was derived during grading of
nearby residential properties, and the southeast corner of the project site is used as a seasonal
pumpkin patch and Christmas tree farm that has covered portions of this area in loose gravel.
Historic agricultural activities (dating back to the 1930s) and the aforementioned dirt
stockpiling activities have eliminated the natural seed base from the project site. Further,
surrounding development has eliminated the potential for seed dispersal from upwind “native
Page 324
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Page 5
plant communities” onto the project site. Due to the lack of suitable habitat, focused surveys
during the blooming period are not required. The determination that the project site does not
have the potential to support special-status plant species is a valid conclusion.
Energy
Consistent with the General Plan EIR conclusions, Project construction and operations
would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Further, the
energy demands of the Project can be accommodated within the context of available resources
and energy delivery systems. The Project would therefore not cause or result in the need for
additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful
or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of
California. The Project would be less intense than the land uses assumed by the GPU EIR for the
Project site, indicating the Project’s overall energy demand would be less than was evaluated and
disclosed by the GPU EIR. Further, the Project has been designed to exceed Title 24 energy
efficiency standards. Notably, as identified in the required Climate Action Plan (CAP)
Consistency Checklist in Attachment E of the Compliance Memo, the Project Applicant has
committed to Zero Net electricity through the purchase of electricity that is generated from 100%
renewable energy from RCMU, as available. There are also no unusual Project characteristics or
construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy
intensive than is used for comparable activities, or equipment that would not conform to current
emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Therefore, construction-related energy
demand would not exceed that anticipated in the General Plan EIR.
Therefore, there are no impacts that are peculiar to the Project site; there are no direct or
cumulatively-considerable impacts of the proposed Project that were not already evaluated by the
GPU EIR; and there are no new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was
previously evaluated and disclosed by the GPU EIR.
GHG Emissions
The City’s CAP was prepared consistent with the standards of CEQA Guidelines Section
15183.5 and is a qualified GHG emissions reduction plan. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a
cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it
complies with the requirements of a “qualified” CAP. Projects that comply with the CAP, as
determined through completion of the CAP Consistent Review Checklist, may rely on the CAP
for the analysis of cumulative GHG emissions impacts as part of the CEQA process. The CAP
Consistency Checklist contains measures that are required to be implemented on a project-by-
project basis to achieve the City’s 2030 reduction target, established to align with the State
legislative 2030 reduction target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by Executive Order
B-30-15 and codified by Senate Bill (SB) 32. The Project has been reviewed for consistency with
CAP through completion of the CAP Consistency Review Checklist, which is included in
Page 325
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 27, 2022
Page 6
Attachment E of the Compliance Memo. Therefore, the Project’s GHG emissions would not be
cumulatively considerable.
In addition, the Compliance Memo analyzes the Project’s consistency with the 2017
Scoping Plan Update, which reflects the State 2030 reduction target. As summarized therein, the
Project would not conflict with any of the provisions of the Scoping Plan Update and would be
subject to any regulations adopted. Further, as noted in the Compliance Memo recent studies
show that the State’s existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the State to reduce
its GHG emissions level to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. As such, the Project would be
consistent with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan Update, and therefore also would be considered
consistent with the GHG reduction mandates specified by SB 32.
The failure of the General Plan to meet the State’s long-term GHG emissions reduction
goals in 2050 is the basis for the significant and unavoidable impact conclusion presented in the
GPU EIR and associated statement of overriding considerations. With respect to the Project, no
further analysis is necessary or required by CEQA as it pertains to future year GHG reduction
targets because the Project’s horizon (buildout) year is anticipated to occur in 2024. Pursuant to
guidance from the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), GHG emissions
“…should be identified for the project horizon year and lead agencies should consider the project
horizon year when applying a threshold of significance” (AEP, 2016, p. 32)1. Because the
Project’s opening year would be 2024, the Project’s GHG emissions are instead evaluated
against the 2030 reduction requirements set forth by Executive Order S-3-05 and SB 32, which
the City’s General Plan and CAP achieves.
Conclusion
As explained above, the allegations raised in the Lozeau Drury letter are inaccurate and
without merit. If you have any questions, please reach out to discuss.
Sincerely,
Amanda Monchamp
1 https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf
Page 326
Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan
May 18, 2022
Application Description
Applicant: WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC
Project: A request to establish a Master Plan on a
vacant 17.2-acre site, related to a mixed-use project.
Location: Northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Milliken Avenue
Background
•Master Plan is proposed in conjunction with a Mixed-
use development comprising of 671 apartments and
20,841 square-feet of commercial space.
•Mixed -use project is consistent with the objectives of
the General Plan and achieves City Council vision.
•Approved by PC on April 27, 2022. PC also
recommended that the CC approve the associated
Master Plan.
Location
N
FOOTHILL BLVDELM AVEHospital
VacantShopping
Center
Apartments
Shopping
Center
Shopping
Center
N
Overall Site Plan
N
INTERIOR STREETS
Interior Streets
N
3-STORY WALK -UPS
Northwest and Northeast Blocks
N
CLUBHOUSE & POOL
Southwest Block
N
4-STORY WRAP
Southeast Block
Renderings
Renderings
Renderings
Renderings
Renderings
N
PROPOSED SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed (Master
Plan)
Proposed
(Project)
Density 36 -60 DU/AC 39 DU/AC
Front Setback –Public ROW
(Applicable to all building frontages along Foothill Blvd., Milliken Ave., Church St., and
Elm Ave.)
0’ to 23’ 1 Varies between
0’ to 23’ 1
Front Setback -Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets)2’ –4” to 5’ 1 Varies between
2’ –4” to 5’ 1
Interior (Side) Setback
(Applicable to south side of project site adjacent to existing shopping center)56’ to 123’ 1 Varies between 56’
to 123’ 1
Distance Between Buildings Per Building Code Per Building Code
Building Height No Minimum
Max. 7 stories
Min. 3 Stories
Max. 4 stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area)Min. 10%14.5%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)190,104 SF
1 –Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of sidewalk.
Master Plan
N
PROPOSED SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed (Master
Plan)
Proposed
(Project)
Density 36 -60 DU/AC 39 DU/AC
Front Setback –Public ROW
(Applicable to all building frontages along Foothill Blvd., Milliken Ave., Church St., and
Elm Ave.)
0’ to 23’ 1 Varies between
0’ to 23’ 1
Front Setback -Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets)2’ –4” to 5’ 1 Varies between
2’ –4” to 5’ 1
Interior (Side) Setback
(Applicable to south side of project site adjacent to existing shopping center)56’ to 123’ 1 Varies between 56’
to 123’ 1
Distance Between Buildings Per Building Code Per Building Code
Building Height No Minimum
Max. 7 stories
Min. 3 Stories,
Max. 4 stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area)Min. 10%14.5%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)190,104 SF
1 –Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of sidewalk.
Master Plan
Conclusion
•The master plan is intended allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under existing development standards.
•Mixed -use project proposed on site meets the General Plan vision and City Council goals.
•Staff recommends that the City Council approve Master Plan DRC2022-00074 establishing specific development regulations on the project site.
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Noah Daniels, Finance Director
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Making
Determinations Regarding the Proposed Annexation of Territory
(Annexation No. 22-1) Located at 7878 East Avenue into an Existing
Community Facilities District, Calling a Special Election, and Authorizing
Submittal of Levy of Special Taxes to the Qualified Electors.
(RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-010) (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Protection District Board adopt a resolution making determinations
and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory
proposed to be annexed (APN: 1100-191-04, Annexation No. 22-1) to existing Community
Facilities District No. 85-1 (“CFD No. 85-1”) and calling a special election for such purpose.
BACKGROUND:
SC Westbury Limited Partnership, property owner, has submitted a proposal to develop property
located at 7878 East Avenue (APN 1100-191-04, the “Annexation Area”) and is conditioned by
the City and Fire Protection District to annex such property into the existing Community Facilities
District (CFD) No. 85-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts.
On April 6, 2022, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of
the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Mello-Roos Act”) by adopting Resolution
No. FD 2022-006 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit “A”) of the territory proposed to be
annexed and Resolution No. FD 2022-007 approving the Intention to Annex APN 1100-191-04 in
the existing CFD 85-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board
of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and
suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held
on May 18, 2022.
Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the
following:
Make certain determinations as set forth in the Resolution;
Call for a special election to be conducted on May 18, 2022;
Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation
Area at such Special election.
Page 327
Page 2
1
2
7
4
ANALYSIS:
The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of
development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. SC Westbury Limited
Partnership, property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being
annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons
registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing
pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation
Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner’s vote, the
landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area.
SC Westbury Limited Partnership, owner of the property within the Annexation Area, has
executed a “Consent and Waiver” of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit “A” of the
Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be
levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory
currently within CFD No. 85-1.
At the special election to be held on May 18, 2022, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its
ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Fire Board
meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the
annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD 85-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of
the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed.
The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The special tax revenues that are collected of the CFD No. 85-1 are used to pay for public facilities
and services in the District area. Costs related to the administering of the District are the
responsibility of the property owners within the District. Annexation of the property located at
7878 East Avenue will ensure the property owner covers the cost of increased demand for fire
services resulting from new development within the Territory.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Annexation of the property into CFD
85-1 ensures the delivery of vital fire and life safety services to all residents while satisfying fire
protection service mitigation impacts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. FD 2022-010, Call for Special Election Annexation 22-1
Attachment 2 - Annexation No. 22-1 Recorded Map
Attachment 3 - CFD No. 85-1 Boundary Map
Page 328
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 1 of 11
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 22-1) TO
AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND
CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF
THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH
TERRITORY
WHEREAS, the Board Of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District (the “Fire Protection District”), Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously declared its
intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community
facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”,
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and
specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the “Act”). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as
Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the “District”); and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent
of the territory to be annexed (the “Annexation Area”), the furnishing of certain public services and all other
related matters has been given; and,
WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more
of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners
representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District;
and,
WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the
Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the
required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors
as authorized by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does
hereby resolve as follows:
1.Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.
2.Determinations. It is determined by this Board of Directors that:
A.all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law,
and specifically the provisions of the Act;
B.less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of
the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified
electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the
owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof,
shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the
Annexation Area;
C.the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special
taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial
Attachment 1
Page 329
analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified
electors of the Annexation Area;
D.the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required
election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and
E.the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied
within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire
Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation
Area.
3.Boundaries of Annexed Area. The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on
which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services
described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows:
All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is
shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled
“Annexation Map No. 22-1 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California” reference
is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit “A” (the “Annexation Map”), and a copy of
which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection.
4. Services and Facilities Authorized to be Financed by the District. The services that are authorized to
be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District are generally
described in Exhibit “B” (the “Services and Facilities”) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference and all costs associated the District, administration of the District, the determination of the amount
of special taxes to be levied, the costs of collection any special taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order
to carry out the authorized purposes of the District.
If and to the extent feasible the Services and Facilities shall be provided in common within the existing
District and the Territory.
5. Special Tax. Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified
electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are
required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real
property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For
particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the
attached and incorporated Exhibit “C” which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to
allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the
special tax that such person will have to pay.
The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be
subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for
ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an
alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the
County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District.
6. Special Tax Accountability Measures. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of
Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability
measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in
Section 5 above:
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 2 of 11
Page 330
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 3 of 11
A.Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above.
B.The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific
applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above.
C.The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes
levied within the District shall be deposited.
D.The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually
file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section
50075.3.
7. Election. The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified
electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1)
vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special
election shall be held on the 18th of May 2022, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted
by the Secretary (hereinafter “Election Official”). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the
approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as
provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added
to and part of the District.
8.Ballot. The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as
follows:
PROPOSITION A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1,
AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY
Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on “Annexation Map No. 22-1 of
Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
County Of San Bernardino, State Of California” (the “Annexation Map”) pursuant to the rate
and method of apportionment of special taxes (the “Special Tax Formula”) set forth in
Resolution No. FD 2021-023 to finance fire suppression and protection services and
administrative expenses?
9.Vote. The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word “YES” shall be counted in
favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word
“NO” in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition.
10.Election Procedure. The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for
the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings
incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be
limited to the following:
A.Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the
election.
B.Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary
forms.
Page 331
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 4 of 11
C.Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area.
D.Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law.
E.Receive the returns of the election.
F.Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the
returns.
G.Canvass the returns of the election.
H.Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election.
I.Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred
as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election
officials.
J.Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election
in the manner and form as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2022.
Page 332
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 5 of 11
EXHIBIT “A”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
ANNEXATION MAP
Page 333
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 6 of 11
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
BOUNDARY MAP
Page 334
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 7 of 11
EXHIBIT “B”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES
The Services.
It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services (the “Services”) that are in
addition to those currently provided in or required for the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased
demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing
services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be financed is as follows:
The performance of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to
provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory.
The Facilities.
It is the intention of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or
rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities (the “Facilities”) that are in addition to those currently provided to
serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from
new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already available to serve the
Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as follows:
Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with a useful life
of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated
facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent that such
facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting from new
development within the Territory.
Page 335
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 8 of 11
EXHIBIT “C”
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustments to the Special Tax authorized
to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the “CFD No. 85-1 Rate and Method”) as originally
established for and as applied to the taxable properties within such community facilities district is as follows:
SPECIAL TAX
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the maximum Special
Tax in the Community Facilities District shall be:
Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax
Residential 1 DU $75.00
Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($75.00)
3 DU: 2.25 ($75.00)
4 DU: 2.65 ($75.00)
5-14 DU: 2.65 ($75.00) + [0.35 (TU-4) ($75.00)]
15-30 DU: 6.15 ($75.00) + [0.30 (TU-14) ($75.00)]
31-80 DU: 10.65 ($75.00) + [0.25 (TU-30) ($75.00)]
81 – up DU: 23.15 ($75.00) + [0.20 (TU-80) ($75.00)]
Commercial ($75.00) per acre + $0.04 per SF
Industrial ($75.00) per acre + $0.05 per SF
Note: DU = Dwelling Units
TU = Total Units
SF = Square Foot
Page 336
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL TAX
The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living or (b) changes
in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended,
whichever is lesser.
REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the
installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall
be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the
structure.
LIMITATIONS ON TAX LEVY
The Special Tax shall only be levied on developed property; provided that the Special Tax shall not
be levied until a “Certification of Occupancy” or “Utility Release” has been issued by the appropriate
governmental agencies.
Developed property is defined to be property:
•Which is not owned by a public or governmental agency
•Which is not vacant
•Where a certificate of occupancy or utility release from the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the
County of San Bernardino has been issued
•Which has an existing building or structure onsite
•Which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood
control facilities – these properties are exempt. Areas granted as easements to power
transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities shall be subtracted from the
total acreage of the underlying lot and shall be exempt.
The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to
meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes,
State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors
shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement,
they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the
Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax.
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 9 of 11
Page 337
* **
Application of the CFD No. 85-1 Rate and Method to Annexation No. 22-1
To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in
Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 22-1 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 shall be:
Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax
Residential 1 DU $185.21
Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($185.21)
3 DU: 2.25 ($185.21)
4 DU: 2.65 ($185.21)
5-14 DU: 2.65 ($185.21) + [0.35 (TU-4) ($185.21)]
15-30 DU: 6.15 ($185.21) + [0.30 (TU-14) ($185.21)]
31-80 DU: 10.65 ($185.21) + [0.25 (TU-30) ($185.21)]
81 – up DU: 23.15 ($185.21) + [0.20 (TU-80) ($185.21)]
Commercial ($185.21) per acre + $0.096 per SF
Industrial ($185.21) per acre + $0.119 per SF
Note: DU = Dwelling Units
TU = Total Units
SF = Square Foot
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT
The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2021, and each July 1st
thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as
defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser.
REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the
installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall
also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below
the main ground floor of the structure.
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 10 of 11
Page 338
Resolution No. FD 2022-010 - Page 11 of 11
LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY
The Special Tax shall only be levied on developed property; provided that the Special Tax shall not
be levied until a “Certification of Occupancy” or “Utility Release” has been issued by the appropriate
governmental agencies.
Developed property is defined to be property:
•Which is not owned by a public or governmental agency
•Which is not vacant
•Where a certificate of occupancy or utility release from the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the
County of San Bernardino has been issued
•Which has an existing building or structure onsite
•Which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood
control facilities – these properties are exempt. Areas granted as easements to power
transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities shall be subtracted from the
total acreage of the underlying lot and shall be exempt.
The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to
meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes,
State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors
shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement,
they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the
Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax.
For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference
is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression
Facilities/Services – Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
Page 339
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 340
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 341
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and
Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the Advanced Traffic
Management Systems Phase I Project (Contract No. 2020-060). (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase I Project, Contract No. 2020-
060 (Project), as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $1,166,627;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,169,745, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project
retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On June 25, 2020, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric,
Inc., in the amount of $1,169,745, plus 10% contingency in the amount of $116,975 to address
unforeseen construction related incidentals. A copy of the June 25, 2020, City Council Staff
Report is on file with the City Clerk. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1.
The scope of work for this construction contract consisted of the installation of traffic signal
communication equipment, including fiber optic cabling, conduit, switches, pullboxes; as well as
video detection systems, uninterrupted power supply systems, close circuit television cameras,
Page 342
Page 2
9
4
2
and removal of unused communication equipment to complete the integration of the traffic signals
along Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Wilson Avenue, Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to
East Avenue, and Vineyard Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Red Hill Country Club Drive into
the City’s Traffic Management Center per the approved plans. Further, under a separate contract
with Iteris, Inc., the City has retimed and coordinated the traffic signals along the Haven Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard corridors to improve the efficiency and operation of these vital corridors.
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contract Change Orders,
including the final Balancing Statement (which conforms the final contract quantities to the actual
quantities placed or constructed during construction), summarized below:
CCO Description Amount
1 Upgrade traffic signal pullboxes and install additional conduit needed
for new fiber optic cables to connect existing traffic signals to the fiber
network.
$13,413
2 Removal of existing brick pavers with median islands and re-
installing said brick pavers along Foothill Boulevard not included in
the project plans.
$19,758
3 Removal, disposal, installation of new conduit, pullboxes, and related
equipment and paver/concrete/asphalt restorations at various
locations.
$33,301
4 Balancing Statement ($69,591)
Total Change Orders (Net Decrease):($3,118)
The completion of the ATMS Phase I project, along with the recent Freeway and Arterial Signal
Synchronization Project, connected communication paths to 51 signalized intersections across
the City. The ability to communicate with traffic signals and CCTV cameras remotely makes it
possible for staff to monitor, retime, and coordinate traffic signals without the need to drive to each
location, saving staff time and resources. A 10-gigabit fiber optic ring has also been completed to
provide redundancy and reliability to the new network and creates a framework for future
expansion. With the work completed by Iteris to retime and coordinate the traffic signals along
Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, the public has experienced significant reductions in travel
time, total delay, and the number of stops during key times of the day.
Finally, at the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from
defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon
approval by the City Engineer.
Page 343
Page 3
9
4
2
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $1,368,120 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2019/20 from the Transportation Fund (Fund
124) in Account No. 11243035650/1982124-0 for this project.
The final project construction cost is $1,250,667 as shown below:
e final project c
A total of $117,453 remains in the budget for this project and will be returned to the
Transportation Fund (Fund 124) fund balances to be used for future capital improvement
projects.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The construction of ATMS Phase I provides the infrastructure necessary to address the City
Council's goal of reducing delays for north/south traffic flow on the Haven Avenue corridor.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Expenditure Amount
Final Construction Contract $1,166,627
Construction Inspection Services $84,040
Total Project Cost $1,250,667
Page 344
ATTACHMENT 1
ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM (ATMS) PHASE 1 PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 345
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Advanced Traffic Management System Phase I (ATMS Phase I) Project
Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer
Engineering Services Department
May 18, 2022
Background
•Construction began in late November
2020, included work to install
•Fiber optic conduit and cabling
•Video detection upgrades
•Uninterrupted power supply systems
•Closed circuit television cameras
•Integrated 36 traffic signals into the
Traffic Management Center network
at City Hall
•5.9 Miles of fiber optic cable
•9 Video detection systems
•16 CCTV locations
Vicinity Map
•Foothill Boulevard from
Grove Avenue to
Rochester Avenue
•Haven Avenue from 4th
Street to 19th Street
•Vineyard Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Red
Hill Country Club Drive
•The project successfully connected 36 traffic signals to the Central
Management System, allowing the ability to
•React to changing traffic patterns
•Monitor and Respond to resident
•Develop and assist in emergency planning
•Maintain coordination between signals
Connectivity
•Connected signals operate in sync, reducing
•“Stop and Go”
•Average delay
•Travel time
Signal Coordination
•Expand the network completed in ATMS I
•Upgrade traffic signal equipment
•Improve traffic operations
•Provide for remote connectivity to traffic
signals
•Reduce delays for traffic flow north/south on
•Milliken Ave,
•Rochester Ave, and
•Day Creek Blvd
•East/west on
•19th St
•Arrow Rte
Next phase
Special thank you to
•Public Works
•DoIT
•RCMU
Questions?
DATE: May 18, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Noah Daniels, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan
(IFP) and Allocating a Portion of the City's and Fire District's Incremental
Property Tax Revenue for the Rancho Cucamonga Enhanced
Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and Authorizing Other Actions
Related Thereto. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-050 AND FD2022-011)
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -050, approving the IFP and
allocating a portion of the City's incremental property tax revenue for the EIFD and authorizing
other actions related thereto.
It is recommended that the Fire District Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. FD2022-011,
approving the IFP and allocating a portion of the Fire District's incremental property tax revenue
for the EIFD and authorizing other actions related thereto.
BACKGROUND:
On February 16, 2022, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention (ROI) to initiate the
establishment of the EIFD and establish the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public Financing Authority
(PFA) as the governing body. Additionally, on the same date, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection Board of Directors adopted a Resolution to Participate in the EIFD and have
membership in the PFA.
Subsequently, on March 8, 2022, the PFA ordered the preparation of the IFP as required by
California Government Code Section regarding Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts
(Government Code Section 53398.50-53398.88). The IFP is the legal document describing the
EIFD, and it is to be adopted by the City Council, Fire Protection Board, and PFA to guide the use
of incremental tax revenues over the life of the EIFD. Public notices were mailed, information was
posted on a dedicated website, and notices were also published in the newspaper, as required
by law, to inform property owners and residents.
On April 5, 2022, the PFA received a presentation of the IFP, taking no action at that time.
Following that public meeting, the PFA must hold three public hearings before considering the
approval of the IFP. The first public hearing was scheduled for and held on May 10, 2022, and a
notice for the public hearing was published for four consecutive weeks beginning on
Page 346
Page 2
April 11, 2022. As of this writing, no written or oral comments have been provided by the public
or affected taxing entities on the IFP or EIFD.
On May 10, 2022, the PFA received a revised IFP with certain modifications made by staff.
Additionally, there were minor administrative edits.
ANALYSIS:
The current IFP is included in the Resolutions as Exhibit A. It contains all items required by the
California Government Code Section regarding Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts. A
summary of the key requirements contained in the IFP is provided below.
Map and Legal Description: The proposed EIFD consists of approximately 1,500 acres of largely
undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels. The parcels are not a contiguous boundary and were
selected to capture the growth in assessed value from expected future development. This strategy
supports the ability of the EIFD to finance public facilities by optimizing the potential for
incremental tax growth after forming the EIFD.
Public Facilities and Development Proposed to be Financed: The public capital facilities proposed
to be financed through the EIFD include:
1. Parking infrastructure and related improvements between Haven Avenue and Day Creek
Boulevard along Foothill Boulevard; and
2. Transportation connectivity improvements linking Cucamonga Station and the area of
Haven Avenue and Arrow Route.
The improvements are of communitywide significance and benefit the area of the proposed EIFD
and the surrounding community. A list of the public improvements and development that the EIFD
may finance is provided in the IFP for reference.
Use of Incremental Tax Revenue: The EIFD will use incremental property tax revenue to finance
public facilities, maintenance and operations of those public facilities, and administration of the
EIFD. The maximum incremental tax revenue the City and Fire District could allocate is $500
million. Based on the projected growth of assessed value, the incremental tax revenue that the
City and Fire District will allocate over the lifetime of the EIFD is approximately $256 million, which
is adequate to fulfill estimated debt service and other obligations related to the development of
identified projects. Although the limit establishes the maximum allocation possible, the IFP will
not allocate more tax revenue to the EIFD than is required to finance the cost of public facilities
and other improvements and pay for administration.
Necessity and Goals of the EIFD: The formation of the EIFD is necessary to finance the
construction of public facilities that serve the EIFD boundary and surrounding community while
providing significant communitywide benefits. These public facilities will catalyze significant
private sector investment and development to support the City's General Plan, facilitate
implementation of regional connectivity through various modes of transportation, and provide the
infrastructure foundation for the development of critically needed housing in the community and
greater region.
Economic and Fiscal Impacts: Establishing the EIFD is a necessary step towards the successful
development of the public facilities and other projects of communitywide significance, which will
generate significant economic benefits to the City and Fire District. A Fiscal Impact Analysis
(Analysis) prepared by Kosmont Companies in March 2022 estimates that the EIFD would add
approximately $146 million and $57 million of assessed value on a present value basis for the
Page 347
Page 3
City and Fire District. In nominal dollars, this is $363 million and $175 million for the City and Fire
District over the lifetime of the EIFD.
The Analysis estimates the net fiscal impacts for the City and Fire District to provide facilities and
services to the EIFD boundary and the taxes, fees, and other revenues expected to be received
due to expected development. Based on the Analysis, in Year 20 of the EIFD, the EIFD area will
generate an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $5.3 million for the City and approximately
$1.2 million for the Fire District.
Additionally, the Analysis highlights the wide-ranging job opportunities generated by the EIFD,
including 10,015 direct, indirect, and induced job creation in the City and County.
Allocation of Incremental Property Tax Revenue: As part of adopting Resolutions to approve the
IFP, the City Council and Fire Board are also taking action to commit a portion of their future
property tax increment growth to the EIFD. Table 3 in the IFP provides an overview of the
projected growth of assessed value, property tax increment, and City and Fire District allocations
over the District's lifetime. Respectively, the maximum portion of the City’s and Fire District’s
property tax increment is 100% and 80% for initial years, decreasing in a gradual manner to
app roximately 9% and 5% until the EIFD’s termination. Based on financial projections, it is
expected that a total of approximately $255,688,000 of incremental tax revenues will be allocated
to the EIFD over its lifetime, consisting of approximately $97,757,000 from the City and
approximately $157,931,000 from the Fire District.
These projections are based on research and analysis of available data at the time of IFP
preparation. As such, actual results may differ, and the PFA may increase or decrease those
allocations during the annual review of the IFP. The $255,688,000 is estimated to fulfill the
estimated debt service and other obligations anticipated for the EIFD.
Page 348
Page 4
Next Steps:
The PFA must hold two more public hearings before the approval of the final IFP. These public
meetings and hearings are scheduled to occur in June and July. The PFA may adopt the IFP at
the third public hearing to form the EIFD.
A summary of the key actions for establishing the EIFD, as well as estimated dates of completion,
is as follows:
Task Target Date Notes
PFA holds Public Hearing #2 June 14, 2022 Additional comments taken; PFA
takes action to approve, modify, or
reject IFP PFA holds Public Hearing #3 and
protest proceeding
July 19, 2022 If majority protest exists – takes action
to terminate EIFD. If no majority
protest, PFA can propose adoption of
the IFP and form the EIFD Staff files EIFD with BOE per guidelines
for Change of Jurisdictional Boundaries
Late 2022
In the event of a majority protest by property owners or residents within the boundaries, the
formation proceedings would be discontinued.
CEQA REVIEW:
The City Council's and Fire Protection Board's adoption of the Resolution Nos. 2022-050 and
FD2022-01 1 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as actions solely
related to the administrative or organizational activities of the City and creation of government
funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities. Therefore, these actions do not
constitute a "project" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5). This
action could result in a physical change in the environment because the City has not committed
itself to any specific project(s) that the EIFD could fund. As a separate and independent ground,
these actions are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the
CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that they will
have a significant effect on the environment. However, future actions (such as the approval of
infrastructure improvements using funding from the EIFD) will be subject to environmental review
in accordance with CEQA. For the same reasons, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Board's decision to approve the IFP is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections
15378(b)(4), 15378(b)(5), and 15061(b)(3).
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no immediate fiscal impact from the adoption of the IFP. If the PFA establishes the EIFD
in July 2022, the EIFD would create the opportunity to use incremental tax revenue to finance
infrastructure investments in the City. If the EIFD is formed, future budget actions will be required
to budget the allocation of incremental tax revenues to the EIFD.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The establishment of an EIFD is in keeping with the Council's core values of intentionally
embracing and anticipating the future, and providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – City Council Resolution No. 2022-050
Attachment 2 – Fire Board Resolution No. FD2022 -011
Page 349
11232-0001\2659908v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCING PLAN FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT AND THE ALLOCATION OF THE
CITY’S INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE WITHIN THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 53398.68 AND 53398.75
WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted California Government Code sections
53398.50 through 53398.88 (“EIFD Law”) authorizing cities and counties to form enhanced
infrastructure financing districts within defined areas and use incremental property tax revenue
generated from the growth in property taxes collected from within such districts to finance certain
infrastructure and community benefit projects; and
WHEREAS, in enacting the EIFD Law, the California Legislature found and determined
that with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, public benefits will accrue if local agencies
are provided a means to finance certain public infrastructure and community benefit projects
authorized under the EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2022-029 (“Resolution of Intention”), which initiated the
process to establish the Rancho Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD”) pursuant to EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council found that the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is necessary for the area within the boundaries of the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) and declared that, pursuant to the
EIFD Law, if approved by resolution pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.68, incremental
property tax revenue from the City within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may be used to finance
the activities described in the Resolution of Intention; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council established the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public Financing Authority (“PFA”) to serve as the governing board of
the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; and
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.63, the PFA
directed the Executive Director of the PFA to prepare a draft Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”)
for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, which IFP is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and is available for
inspection at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA,
91730; and
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 350
-2-
11232-0001\2659908v1.doc
WHEREAS, the IFP, among other things, includes a description of the public facilities to
be financed by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and a financing section that includes, among other
things, a specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City and of
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) proposed to be committed to the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD for each year during which the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will receive
incremental tax revenue, and a projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received
by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD in each year during which the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will
receive tax revenues, including an estimate of the amount of tax revenues attributable to the City
and to the District for each year; and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.63, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 22-08, finding
that the facilities to be financed pursuant to the IFP are consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the PFA held a public meeting to present the IFP and on
May 10, 2022, the PFA held a public hearing to consider oral and written comments to the IFP;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt this Resolution pursuant to Government
Code Section 53398.68 to approve the IFP, substantially in the form prepared by the Executive
Director of the PFA, including the allocation of incremental tax revenue of the City in accordance
with Government Code Section 53398.75 as set forth in the IFP;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, conclude and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the IFP for the Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD substantially in the form presented to the City Council and attached hereto as “Exhibit A”,
including, but not limited to, the specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax
revenue of the City to be committed to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD for each year during which
the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will receive incremental tax revenue.
Section 3. The City Manager, or designee, are hereby authorized and directed to take
all actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this
Resolution.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City
Council and the City Clerk shall cause a copy thereof to be forwarded to the PFA.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
Page 351
-3-
11232-0001\2659908v1.doc
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of MAY, 2022, by the following vote:
________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of May 2022.
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Page 352
11232-0001\2659908v1.doc
Exhibit A
Infrastructure Financing Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure
Financing District
Page 353
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN
APRIL 2022
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 354
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 2
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Description of the Proposed District ..................................................................................... 7
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities and Development ........................................................... 8
4.0 Finding of Communitywide Significance ............................................................................ 12
5.0 Financing Section ............................................................................................................... 13
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and Replacement Housing Plan .............................................. 18
7.0 Goals of the District ............................................................................................................ 19
8.0 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 20
Index of Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix E: City General Plan Environmental Impact Report
Page 355
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 3
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background & Purpose
Background. Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2022-029, which was adopted by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 16, 2022 (the “Resolution of Intention”) and Part 1
of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the “EIFD Law”), the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”) declared its intention to establish the Rancho
Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Rancho Cucamonga EIFD” or “District”).
Pursuant to the same Resolution No. 2022-029, which was adopted by the City Council on
February 16, 2022, the City Council of the City established the “Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public
Financing Authority” (“PFA”) as the governing body of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Pursuant to its Resolution No. FD 2022-003, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District on February 16, 2022 and the EIFD Law, the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“Fire District”) declared its intention to participate in the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and newly formed PFA.
At its inaugural meeting on March 8, 2022, the PFA directed its Executive Director, who is the
City Manager of the City, to prepare an infrastructure financing plan (“IFP”) for the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD.
Purpose of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is intended to serve
as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative
potential for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD area and the City as a whole. The Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD encompasses approximately 1,500 acres of land, representing approximately 6.0% of the
total approximately 25,677 acres in the City limits. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD includes various
non-contiguous, largely undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels with significant potential for new
development and/or rehabilitation. These areas were chosen based on their capacity to benefit
from catalytic infrastructure improvements with communitywide significance and regional benefit.
1.2 Contents and Overview of this Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”)
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 53398.59 through 53398.74, this IFP includes the
following information:
a) A map and legal description of the District, included herein as Appendix A and Appendix
B, respectively.
Page 356
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 4
b) A description of the public facilities and other forms of development or financial assistance
that is proposed in the area of the District, including those to be provided by the private
sector, those to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District,
those public improvements and facilities to be financed with assistance from the proposed
District, and those to be provided jointly. The description includes the proposed location,
timing, and costs of the development and financial assistance. This information is
included in Section 3 of this IFP.
c) A finding that the development and financial assistance are of communitywide
significance and provide significant benefits to an area larger than the area of the District.
This information is included in Section 4 of this IFP.
d) A financing section (included in Section 5 of this IFP), which contains all of the following
information:
1) A specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City
and Fire District proposed to be committed to the District for each year during
which the District will receive incremental tax revenue. The portion may change
over time. Section 5.1 and Table 3 of this IFP details the maximum portion of the
incremental property tax revenue of the City and Fire District proposed to be
committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime, which is
projected to be forty-five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds
is approved by the PFA. In summary, the maximum portion of the City’s property
tax increment is 100% for initial years following formation of the District,
decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 9% at District termination. The
maximum portion of the Fire District’s property tax increment is 80% for initial
years following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to
approximately 5% at District termination. The proposed contribution scenario is
intended to focus on funding debt service for bonds issued approximately four to
six years following District formation, as well as maintenance of funded
infrastructure improvements.
2) A projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received by the District
in each year during which the District will receive tax revenues. Section 5.2 and
Table 3 of this IFP includes a projection of tax revenues to be received by the
District by year over the course of the District’s lifetime, as described in the
previous paragraph. These projections are based on research and analysis of
available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual
results may differ from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides
additional detail for the projected revenue analysis. See paragraph 5 below for the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD termination date.
Page 357
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 5
3) A plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District, including a
detailed description of any intention to incur debt. Section 5.4 of this IFP includes
a plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District. The PFA
intends to incur debt only when it is financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at
this time that the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will provide funding for approximately
$100 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement costs from a
combination of tax increment bond or loan proceeds (multiple issuances may be
necessary) and pay-as-you-go tax increment funding over the District lifetime.
4) A limit on the total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District
pursuant to the plan. The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to
the District shall not exceed $500,000,000 in nominal dollars.
5) A date on which the District will cease to exist, by which time all tax allocation to
the district will end. The date shall not be more than 45 years from the date on
which the issuance of bonds is approved pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section
53398.81, or the issuance of a loan is approved by the governing board of a local
agency pursuant to Section 53398.87. The District will cease to exist on the earlier
of: (i) forty-five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds is
approved by the PFA, or (ii) June 30, 2072. This IFP assumes that the District will
be formed in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and will begin receiving tax revenues in Fiscal
Year 2022-2023.
6) An analysis of the costs to the City of providing facilities and services to the area
of the District while the area is being developed and after the area is developed.
The plan shall also include an analysis of the tax, fee, charge, and other revenues
expected to be received by the City as a result of expected development in the
area of the District. Appendix D to this IFP includes, as part of the Fiscal Impact
Analysis, an analysis of the costs to the City for providing facilities and services to
the area of the District. Appendix D also includes an analysis of the tax, fee,
charge, and other revenues expected to be received by the City as a result of
expected development in the area of the District. It is estimated that, at Year 20
of the District lifetime (assumed stabilized buildout of the District area), annual
costs to the City will be approximately $20.2 million and annual revenues are
approximately $25.5 million. Additionally, annual costs to the Fire District at Year
20 are estimated at $4.6 million and annual revenues are approximately $5.8
million.
7) An analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated
development upon the City and the Fire District. Appendix D to this IFP includes
an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated
development upon the City and the Fire District, as the only affected taxing entities
that are contributing tax increment revenues to the District at this time. It is
Page 358
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 6
estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime, the District area will generate an
annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $5.3 million to the City and an annual
net fiscal surplus of approximately $1.2 million to the Fire District.
8) A plan for financing any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a
developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of that
District and qualifies for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section
65470, including any permit and affordable housing expenses related to the
project. At this time, the PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that
may be incurred by reimbursing a developer of a project that is both located
entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies for the Transit Priority
Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470.
e) If any dwelling units within the territory of the District are proposed to be removed or
destroyed in the course of public works construction within the area of the district or
private development within the area of the district that is subject to a written agreement
with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the District, a plan providing for
replacement of those units and relocation of those persons or families consistent with the
requirements of Section 53398.56. The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units
will be removed as a result of any project identified in this IFP. However, if any relocation
of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a project financed by the
District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code Section
53398.56.
f) The goals the District proposes to achieve for each project financed pursuant to Section
53398.52. Section 7 of this IFP summarizes the goals of each project to be financed by
the District.
Page 359
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 7
2.0 Description of the Proposed District
The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD encompasses approximately 1,500 acres of land, representing
approximately 6.0% of the total approximately 25,677 acres within the City limits. The Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD includes various non-contiguous, largely undeveloped or underdeveloped
parcels with significant potential for new development and/or rehabilitation. These areas were
chosen based on their capacity to benefit from catalytic infrastructure improvements with
communitywide significance and regional benefit.
Land use designations in the District primarily include residential, commercial / hotel / retail /
office, industrial, and several public use parcels. Appendix A includes a map of the proposed
District, and Appendix B is a legal description of the District.
Page 360
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 8
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities
and Development
3.1 Anticipated Future Private Development
Anticipated future private development within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is summarized in
Table 1 below, with greater detail provided in Appendix C. Buildout and absorption of these land
uses are forecasted in the first 20 years of the District lifetime.
Table 1: Anticipated Future Private Development
Development Type SF / Units AV Per SF / Unit
Estimated AV at
Buildout
(2022 Nominal
Value)
For-sale Residential 1,514 units $618,074 per unit $936 million
Rental Residential 10,253 units $317,440 per unit $3.255 billion
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF $274 PSF $253 million
Office 222,000 SF $211 PSF $47 million
Industrial 6,272,400 SF $172 PSF $1.079 billion
Hotel 171 rooms $162,000 per room $28 million
Estimated Total
$5.597 billion
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Economic Development Staff, CoStar Property (2022)
3.2 Public Facilities to be Financed with Assistance from the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
The EIFD Law authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD to finance the purchase, construction,
expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property
with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer, if they are of communitywide significance and
provide significant benefits to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or the surrounding community.
The PFA intends to utilize the District to fund infrastructure projects of communitywide significance
that provide significant benefits to the region over the District lifetime. Table 2 identifies the
targeted infrastructure improvements to receive EIFD funding over the District’s lifetime.
Page 361
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 9
Table 2: Potential Priority Projects for Receipt of EIFD Funding
# PROJECT ESTIMATED
COST
ESTIMATED
TIMING
1
Parking infrastructure and related improvements
between Haven Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard
along Foothill Corridor
$20-40 million 2028-2032
2 Transportation Connectivity Improvements linking
Cucamonga Station and Haven / Arrow focus area $40-60 million 2028-2032
Estimated Total Priority Projects $60-100 million
Additional expenditures by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, including any use of potential future
EIFD bond proceeds, will be subject to approval by the PFA. Eligible expenditures in accordance
with Government Code sections 53398.52 and 53398.56 include the purchase, construction,
expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property
with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer and are projects of communitywide significance
that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community. The Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD may also finance the ongoing or capitalized costs to maintain public capital
facilities financed in whole or in part by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. Facilities funded may be
located outside the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, as long as they have a tangible
connection to the work of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will also
finance planning and design activities that are directly related to the purchase, construction,
expansion, or rehabilitation of these projects. Projects financed by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
may include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
Highways, interchanges, and ramps;
Bridges;
Arterial streets;
Parking facilities;
Transit facilities;
Parks, recreational facilities, and open space;
Sewage treatment and water reclamation plants and interceptor pipes;
Facilities for the collection and treatment of water for urban uses;
Facilities for the transfer and disposal of solid waste, including transfer stations and
vehicles;
Storm water conveyance and collection facilities;
Flood control levees and dams, retention basins, and drainage channels;
Child care facilities;
Libraries;
Broadband and telecommunications infrastructure;
Sidewalks and streetscape improvements;
Bicycle lanes and paths;
Public art;
Page 362
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 10
Corporation yards;
Police facilities;
Brownfield restoration and other environmental mitigation;
Affordable housing as authorized under the EIFD Law;
Projects that implement a sustainable communities strategy and transit priority projects;
Acquisition, construction, or repair of industrial structures for private use;
Acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business
occupant of such structures, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of
fostering economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and of ensuring the long-term
economic sustainability of small businesses;
Projects that enable communities to adapt to the impacts of climate change, including, but
not limited to, higher average temperatures, decreased air and water quality, the spread
of infectious and vector-borne diseases, other public health impacts, extreme weather
events, sea level rise, flooding, heat waves, wildfires, and drought;
Facilities in which nonprofit community organizations provide health, youth, homeless, and
social services.
Other Expenses: In addition to the direct costs of the above facilities, the Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD may finance the costs of planning and design work that is directly related to the purchase,
construction, expansion or rehabilitation of property, including, but not limited to, the cost of
environmental evaluation and engineering and surveying costs; environmental remediation costs;
construction staking costs; utility relocation and demolition costs incidental to the construction of
the facilities; costs of legal services; and costs of project/construction management.
In addition, the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may finance any other expenses incidental to the
formation, administration1 and implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and to the
construction, completion, inspection and acquisition of the authorized facilities, including, but not
limited to, the costs of creation and administration of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; costs of
issuance of bonds or other debt of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or of any other public agency
(including a community facilities district) that finances authorized facilities, and payment of debt
service thereon; financing costs of improvements incurred by developers until reimbursement for
the costs of the improvements from the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; costs incurred by the City,
1 Administration costs refer to the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD, including, but not limited to, the following: the costs of computing annual tax increment revenues and
preparing the required annual reporting; the costs of allocation tax increment revenues (whether by the County, the City,
or otherwise); the costs to the City, Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, or any designee thereof in complying with disclosure
requirements; the costs associated with preparing required disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries
regarding the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; and the costs of the City, Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, or any designee thereof
related to any appeal of the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. Administration costs shall also include
amounts estimated or advanced by the City for any other administrative purposes, including, but not limited to, attorney’s
fees or any other expenses incidental to the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Page 363
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 11
Fire District, or the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD in connection with the division of taxes pursuant to
Government Code section 53398.75; and legal costs.
Targeted improvements would conform to established guidelines in adopted planning
documentation, such as the City General Plan.
The PFA intends to continue to identify, evaluate, and pursue additional funding sources and
financing mechanisms aside from District tax increment to implement the improvements identified
above, potentially including grant sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District), impact fees, private sector investment incentivized by the formation
of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD itself, and/or other sources.
Private sector developers will be responsible for funding project-specific / fair-share / in-tract
infrastructure. Some public facilities included in the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD area are
anticipated to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District. There
are no public facilities anticipated to be provided jointly by the private sector and governmental
entities; however, it is possible that private sector developers may advance funding for
improvements, and those advances may be partially reimbursed with EIFD proceeds. Such case-
specific agreements would come before the PFA for approval at the appropriate time.
In accordance with Government Code Section 53398.69, the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may
expend up to 10 percent of any accrued tax increment in the first two years of the effective date
of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD on planning and dissemination of information to the residents
within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD boundaries about the IFP and planned activities to be funded
by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, including reimbursement of the City’s advanced funding of such
eligible costs.
In addition, in accordance with Government Code Section 53398.76, costs incurred by the County
of San Bernardino in connection with the division of taxes for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD are
eligible to be paid by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Page 364
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 12
4.0 Finding of Communitywide
Significance
Implementation of the District promotes the goals of and is consistent with the City’s General Plan,
facilitates implementation of regional connectivity through various modes of transportation, and
provides the infrastructure foundation for the development of critically needed housing in the
community and greater region.
The District supports job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life, and
promotion of environmental sustainability.
Specific communitywide and regional benefits anticipated to be generated by the District include:
Approx. $146 million in net fiscal impact to the City over 50 years (on a present-value
basis)
Approx. $57 million in net fiscal impact to the Fire District over 50 years (on a present-
value basis)
Approx. 11,767 housing units within the District upon buildout and stabilization
69,452 direct, indirect, and induced temporary, construction-related job-years2 in the City
and County
7,440 direct, permanent jobs in the City upon buildout and stabilization
2,575 additional indirect and induced permanent jobs in the City and County (total of
10,015 direct, indirect, and induced jobs) upon buildout and stabilization
$8.115 billion in economic output from construction in the City and County
$1.136 billion in annual ongoing economic output in the City and County upon buildout
and stabilization.
2 A job-year is defined as one year of employment for one employee. Over a 20-year construction period, 69,452 job-years
translates into approximately 3,473 annual average jobs.
Page 365
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 13
5.0 Financing Section
Projections included in this IFP are based on research and analysis of available data at the time
of IFP for purposes of planning and illustration. Actual results may differ from those expressed in
this document.
Aside from the City and Fire District, no other taxing entity is allocating property tax increment to
the District at this time. It is anticipated that property tax increment will be utilized on both a “pay-
as-you-go” basis as well as security for tax increment bond issuance or loan acquisition.
Definition of Tax Increment. For purposes of clarity, the phrases “tax increment,” “incremental
property tax” and “incremental tax revenue”, as used in this IFP and the EIFD Law, refer to the
portion of future property tax revenue described in Section 53398.75(a)(2) of the EIFD Law, i.e.,
the difference between (A) and (B) in the following formula:
(A) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year during
the term of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable
property in the EIFD in each such year minus
(B) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied upon the total
sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD as shown
upon the last equalized roll prior to the effective date of the resolution adopted pursuant to Section
53398.69 of the EIFD Law to create the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
In the case of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, the resolution adopted pursuant to Section 53398.69
was [is expected to be] adopted on July 19, 2022, and the last equalized roll prior to the effective
date of that resolution is the roll for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Fiscal Year 2021-22 is referred to as
the “base year.” The assessed value of the taxable property shown in such last equalized roll is
approximately $729 million. This value is referred to as the “base year value”.
Overlap with Boundaries of former Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD includes overlap with former Redevelopment Project Area boundaries
of the former Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and so property tax revenues
generated by the properties within the overlapping area will flow according to the Redevelopment
Agency dissolution statutes until all of the Successor Agency’s obligations are retired and the
Successor Agency is dissolved (currently anticipated by 2034). The City and Fire District
anticipate allocating Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) residual revenues to the
District as part of the maximum allocations outlined in the following sections. As such, the exhibits
included in this plan reflect such allocations.
Page 366
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 14
Where the District boundaries overlap with the boundaries of the former Redevelopment Project
Area, any debt or obligation of a District shall be subordinate to any and all enforceable obligations
of the former Redevelopment Agency, as approved by the Oversight Board and the Department
of Finance.
5.1 Maximum Portion of Incremental Tax Revenue Dedicated to the District
Table 3 details the maximum portion of the incremental property tax revenue of the City and Fire
District proposed to be committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime. In
summary, the maximum portion of the City’s property tax increment is 100% for initial years
following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 9% at District
termination. The maximum portion of the Fire District’s property tax increment is 80% for initial
years following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 5% at
District termination. The proposed contribution scenario is intended to focus on funding debt
service for bonds issued approximately four to six years following District formation, as well as
maintenance of funded infrastructure improvements.
5.2 Projection of District Tax Revenues by Year
Table 3 provides an overview of the projected growth of assessed value, property tax increment,
and City and Fire District allocations to the District over the District lifetime. It is expected that a
total of approximately $255,688,000 of incremental tax revenues will be allocated to the District
over the District lifetime (approximately $97,757,000 from the City and approximately
$157,931,000 from the Fire District). These projections are based on research and analysis of
available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual results may differ
from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides additional detail for the projected
revenue analysis.
5.3 Plan for Financing Public Facilities
The PFA intends to utilize numerous funding sources and financing mechanisms to implement
the improvements identified in Section 3.2, potentially including District tax increment, grant
sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Community Facilities District), impact fees,
private sector investment incentivized by the formation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD itself,
and/or other sources.
As it pertains to the use of District tax increment, the PFA intends to incur debt only when it is
financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at this time that the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will
provide funding for approximately $100 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement
costs from a combination of tax increment bond or loan proceeds (multiple issuances may be
necessary) and pay-as-you-go tax increment funding over the District lifetime
Page 367
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 15
5.4 Limit on Total Dollars Allocated to the District
The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District shall not exceed
$500,000,000 in nominal dollars over the District lifetime.
The City hereby irrevocably allocates all of the City’s share of tax increment as characterized
herein to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD to the extent that: (i) the City’s share of increment is
necessary to repay bonds, notes or related agreements or to meet contractual obligations that
the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is obligated to satisfy with Rancho Cucamonga EIFD tax
increment, and (ii) prior to the PFA incurring an obligation under subsection (i), such bonds, notes,
agreements or obligations shall be approved by the City Council.
5.5 District Termination Date
The District will cease to exist the earlier of: (i) forty five (45) years from the date on which the
issuance of bonds is approved by the PFA, or (ii) June 30, 2072. This IFP assumes that the District
will be formed in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and will begin receiving tax revenues in Fiscal Year 2022-
2023.
5.6 Analysis of Costs to Provide Facilities and Services
Appendix D to this IFP includes, as part of the Fiscal Impact Analysis, an analysis of the costs to
the City for providing facilities and services to the area of the District while the area is being
developed and after the area is developed. It is estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime
(assumed stabilized buildout of District area), annual costs to the City will be approximately $20.2
million to service the area of the District. Additionally, annual costs to the Fire District at Year 20
are estimated at $4.6 million.
5.7 Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix D to this IFP includes an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the
associated development upon the City and the Fire District, as the only affected taxing entities
that are allocating tax increment revenues to the District. Table 4 presents an overview of fiscal
impacts to the City and Fire District. It is estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime, the
District area will generate an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $5.3 million to the City
and an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $1.2 million to the Fire District. Over 50 years,
it is estimated that District activity will generate a positive net fiscal impact of approximately $146
million for the City and approximately $57 million for the Fire District on a present-value basis.
This is in addition to the Community economic benefits outlined in Section 4 of this IFP (e.g.,
housing, jobs, mobility and connectivity, quality of life, environmental sustainability).
Page 368
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 16
Table 3: Projection of District Revenues by Year
Incremental
Assessed Value
Property Tax
Increment @
1% General
Levy
Average City
Share
Available
City
Increment
Available
Portion of
City Share
Allocated
City
Increment
Allocated
Average Fire
District Share
Available
Fire District
Increment
Available
Portion of
Fire Share
Allocated
Fire
Increment
Allocated
Total Taxes
Allocated to
EIFD
0 2021 / 2022 $0 $0 5.20% $0 100% $0 12.4% $0 80%$0 $0
1 2022 / 2023 $79,994,178 $799,942 5.20% $41,565 100% $41,565 12.4% $98,820 80% $79,056 $120,622
2 2023 / 2024 $1,460,958,382 $14,609,584 5.20% $759,118 100% $759,118 12.4% $1,804,788 80% $1,443,830 $2,202,948
3 2024 / 2025 $2,629,495,495 $26,294,955 5.20% $1,366,293 100% $1,366,293 12.4% $3,248,334 80% $2,598,667 $3,964,961
4 2025 /2026 $3,843,897,932 $38,438,979 5.20% $1,997,300 100% $1,997,300 12.4% $4,748,540 80% $3,798,832 $5,796,133
5 2026 / 2027 $5,123,419,002 $51,234,190 5.20% $2,662,143 100% $2,662,143 12.4% $6,329,190 80% $5,063,352 $7,725,495
6 2027 / 2028 $5,471,300,778 $54,713,008 5.20% $2,842,904 90% $2,558,613 12.4% $6,758,944 70% $4,731,261 $7,289,874
7 2028 / 2029 $5,830,756,681 $58,307,567 5.20% $3,029,678 90% $2,726,710 12.4% $7,202,996 70% $5,042,097 $7,768,808
8 2029 / 2030 $6,202,110,524 $62,021,105 5.20% $3,222,634 90% $2,900,371 12.4% $7,661,746 70% $5,363,222 $8,263,593
9 2030 / 2031 $6,585,694,440 $65,856,944 5.20% $3,421,946 90% $3,079,751 12.4% $8,135,605 70% $5,694,923 $8,774,675
10 2031 / 2032 $6,981,849,092 $69,818,491 5.20% $3,627,789 90% $3,265,010 12.4% $8,624,993 70% $6,037,495 $9,302,505
11 2032 / 2033 $7,136,074,915 $71,360,749 5.20% $3,707,925 80% $2,966,340 12.4% $8,815,515 60% $5,289,309 $8,255,649
12 2033 / 2034 $7,293,385,254 $72,933,853 5.20% $3,789,664 80% $3,031,731 12.4% $9,009,847 60% $5,405,908 $8,437,639
13 2034 / 2035 $7,453,841,799 $74,538,418 5.20% $3,873,038 80% $3,098,430 12.4% $9,208,066 60% $5,524,840 $8,623,270
14 2035 / 2036 $7,617,507,476 $76,175,075 5.20% $3,958,079 80% $3,166,463 12.4% $9,410,250 60% $5,646,150 $8,812,613
15 2036 / 2037 $7,784,446,466 $77,844,465 5.20% $4,044,821 80% $3,235,857 12.4% $9,616,477 60% $5,769,886 $9,005,743
16 2037 / 2038 $7,954,724,236 $79,547,242 5.20% $4,133,298 70% $2,893,308 12.4% $9,826,829 50% $4,913,414 $7,806,723
17 2038 / 2039 $8,128,407,561 $81,284,076 5.20% $4,223,544 70% $2,956,481 12.4% $10,041,388 50% $5,020,694 $7,977,175
18 2039 / 2040 $8,305,564,553 $83,055,646 5.20% $4,315,595 70% $3,020,917 12.4% $10,260,238 50% $5,130,119 $8,151,036
19 2040 / 2041 $8,486,264,685 $84,862,647 5.20% $4,409,488 70% $3,086,641 12.4% $10,483,465 50% $5,241,732 $8,328,374
20 2041 / 2042 $8,670,578,819 $86,705,788 5.20% $4,505,258 70% $3,153,680 12.4% $10,711,156 50% $5,355,578 $8,509,259
21 2042 / 2043 $8,858,579,236 $88,585,792 5.20% $4,602,943 60% $2,761,766 12.4% $10,943,402 40% $4,377,361 $7,139,127
22 2043 / 2044 $9,050,339,661 $90,503,397 5.20% $4,702,583 60% $2,821,550 12.4% $11,180,292 40% $4,472,117 $7,293,666
23 2044 / 2045 $9,245,935,295 $92,459,353 5.20% $4,804,215 60% $2,882,529 12.4% $11,421,920 40% $4,568,768 $7,451,297
24 2045 / 2046 $9,445,442,842 $94,454,428 5.20% $4,907,879 60% $2,944,728 12.4% $11,668,381 40% $4,667,352 $7,612,080
25 2046 / 2047 $9,648,940,539 $96,489,405 5.20% $5,013,617 60% $3,008,170 12.4% $11,919,771 40% $4,767,908 $7,776,079
26 2047 / 2048 $9,856,508,190 $98,565,082 5.20% $5,121,470 50% $2,560,735 12.4% $12,176,188 30% $3,652,856 $6,213,592
27 2048 / 2049 $10,068,227,195 $100,682,272 5.20% $5,231,480 50% $2,615,740 12.4% $12,437,734 30% $3,731,320 $6,347,060
28 2049 / 2050 $10,284,180,579 $102,841,806 5.20% $5,343,690 50% $2,671,845 12.4% $12,704,511 30% $3,811,353 $6,483,198
29 2050 / 2051 $10,504,453,032 $105,044,530 5.20% $5,458,144 50% $2,729,072 12.4% $12,976,624 30% $3,892,987 $6,622,059
30 2051 /2052 $10,729,130,933 $107,291,309 5.20% $5,574,887 50% $2,787,444 12.4% $13,254,178 30% $3,976,254 $6,763,697
31 2052 / 2053 $10,958,302,392 $109,583,024 5.20% $5,693,965 40% $2,277,586 12.4% $13,537,284 20% $2,707,457 $4,985,043
32 2053 / 2054 $11,192,057,280 $111,920,573 5.20% $5,815,425 40% $2,326,170 12.4% $13,826,052 20% $2,765,210 $5,091,381
33 2054 / 2055 $11,430,487,267 $114,304,873 5.20% $5,939,314 40% $2,375,726 12.4% $14,120,596 20% $2,824,119 $5,199,845
34 2055 / 2056 $11,673,685,853 $116,736,859 5.20% $6,065,681 9% $545,911 12.4% $14,421,030 5% $721,051 $1,266,963
35 2056 / 2057 $11,921,748,410 $119,217,484 5.20% $6,194,575 9% $557,512 12.4% $14,727,473 5% $736,374 $1,293,885
36 2057 / 2058 $12,174,772,219 $121,747,722 5.20% $6,326,047 9% $569,344 12.4% $15,040,044 5% $752,002 $1,321,346
37 2058 / 2059 $12,432,856,504 $124,328,565 5.20% $6,460,148 9% $581,413 12.4% $15,358,867 5% $767,943 $1,349,357
38 2059 / 2060 $12,696,102,475 $126,961,025 5.20% $6,596,931 9% $593,724 12.4% $15,684,067 5% $784,203 $1,377,927
39 2060 / 2061 $12,964,613,365 $129,646,134 5.20% $6,736,450 9% $606,281 12.4% $16,015,771 5% $800,789 $1,407,069
40 2061 / 2062 $13,238,494,473 $132,384,945 5.20% $6,878,760 9% $619,088 12.4% $16,354,108 5% $817,705 $1,436,794
41 2062 / 2063 $13,517,853,203 $135,178,532 5.20% $7,023,915 9% $632,152 12.4% $16,699,213 5% $834,961 $1,467,113
42 2063 / 2064 $13,802,799,107 $138,027,991 5.20% $7,171,974 9% $645,478 12.4% $17,051,219 5% $852,561 $1,498,039
43 2064 / 2065 $14,093,443,930 $140,934,439 5.20% $7,322,994 9% $659,069 12.4% $17,410,266 5% $870,513 $1,529,583
44 2065 / 2066 $14,389,901,649 $143,899,016 5.20% $7,477,034 9% $672,933 12.4% $17,776,493 5% $888,825 $1,561,758
45 2066 / 2067 $14,692,288,523 $146,922,885 5.20% $7,634,155 9% $687,074 12.4% $18,150,045 5% $907,502 $1,594,576
46 2067 / 2068 $15,000,723,134 $150,007,231 5.20% $7,794,419 9% $701,498 12.4% $18,531,069 5% $926,553 $1,628,051
47 2068 / 2069 $15,315,326,437 $153,153,264 5.20% $7,957,888 9% $716,210 12.4% $18,919,712 5% $945,986 $1,662,196
48 2069 / 2070 $15,636,221,807 $156,362,218 5.20% $8,124,626 9% $731,216 12.4% $19,316,129 5% $965,806 $1,697,023
49 2070 / 2071 $15,963,535,083 $159,635,351 5.20% $8,294,699 9% $746,523 12.4% $19,720,474 5% $986,024 $1,732,547
50 2071 / 2072 $16,297,394,626 $162,973,946 5.20% $8,468,173 9% $762,136 12.4% $20,132,905 5% $1,006,645 $1,768,781
$4,901,246,175 $254,670,163 38% $97,757,347 $605,473,006 26% $157,930,876 $255,688,223
$2,127,176,505 $110,528,704 51% $55,963,836 $262,779,691 36% $93,907,319 $149,871,155
City Contribution Fire District Contribution
Fiscal Year
Total
Present Value @ 3%
Page 369
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 17
Table 4: Overview of Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire District
5.8 Developer Reimbursement for Transit Priority Project
The PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a
developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies
for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470. To the extent that a developer
is willing to fund Transit Priority Project infrastructure expenditures beyond and in advance of said
developer’s fair share (not contemplated at this time), the PFA may consider and evaluate such
reimbursement at the appropriate time.
Annual
(Stablized
Year 20)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$25,486,770 $1,622,088,000 $651,158,500
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $20,218,100 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $5,268,670 $364,427,900 $145,928,900
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$5,795,350 $463,975,600 $172,055,900
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $4,613,300 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to Fire District $1,182,050 $176,995,700 $56,761,100
Page 370
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 18
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and
Replacement Housing Plan
The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units will be removed as a result of any public works
construction within the area of the District or private development within the area of the District
that is subject to a written agreement with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the
District. However, if any relocation of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a
project financed by the District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code
Section 53398.56.
Page 371
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 19
7.0 Goals of the District
As stated in the Resolution of Intention, the goal of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is to assist in
the provision of public facilities of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits
and promote economic development within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or
the surrounding community and, for those facilities located outside the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
boundaries which also have a tangible connection to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
More specifically, the goals of the District’s implementation of the public facilities outlined in
Section 3.2 are to support the City’s General Plan, facilitate implementation of regional
connectivity through various modes of transportation, and to provide the infrastructure foundation
for the development of critically-needed housing in the community and greater region. The District
additionally aims to implement Statewide policy goals of housing supply and sustainable
infrastructure investment.
Additional objectives include economic development in the form of fiscal revenue generation for
the City and other taxing entities, job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life,
and promotion of environmental sustainability. The District will be utilized to address critical
infrastructure funding needs, which are are critical to catalyze private sector investment and
development.
Page 372
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 20
8.0 Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix E: City General Plan Envionmental Impact Report
Page 373
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Total 2021-2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units 202 units 236 units 2,583 units 2,583 units 2,583 units 413 units 413 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904 $65,405,338 $77,942,440 $870,022,578 $887,423,029 $905,171,490 $147,785,952 $150,741,671
For Sale Residential 1,514 units 832 units 67 units 67 units 67 units 96 units 96 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094 $535,012,766 $44,164,275 $45,047,560 $45,948,512 $66,820,964 $68,157,384
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF 22,000 SF 284,667 SF 284,667 SF 284,667 SF 9,200 SF 9,200 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823 $6,271,531 $82,772,809 $84,428,265 $86,116,831 $2,838,830 $2,895,607
Office 222,000 SF 22,000 SF 40,000 SF 40,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954 $4,829,537 $9,504,811 $9,694,907
Hotel 171 units 71 units 100 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790 $11,966,681 $17,886,109
Industrial 6,272,408 SF 4,072,408 SF 700,000 SF 700,000 SF 700,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574 $728,752,525 $127,769,443 $130,324,832 $132,931,329 $3,873,999 $3,951,479
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138 $65,405,338 $1,364,775,479 $1,124,729,105 $1,147,223,687 $1,188,054,270 $230,824,556 $235,441,047
Total Assessed Value $729,442,030 $809,436,208 $2,190,400,412 $3,358,937,525 $4,573,339,962 $5,852,861,032 $6,200,742,808 $6,560,198,711
Incremental AV $79,994,178 $1,460,958,382 $2,629,495,495 $3,843,897,932 $5,123,419,002 $5,471,300,778 $5,830,756,681
Total tax increment @ 1%$799,942 $14,609,584 $26,294,955 $38,438,979 $51,234,190 $54,713,008 $58,307,567
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163 $41,565 $759,118 $1,366,293 $1,997,300 $2,662,143 $2,842,904 $3,029,678
Percent Allocated to EIFD 100%100%100%100%100%90%90%
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347 $41,565 $759,118 $1,366,293 $1,997,300 $2,662,143 $2,558,613 $2,726,710
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006 $98,820 $1,804,788 $3,248,334 $4,748,540 $6,329,190 $6,758,944 $7,202,996
Percent Allocated to EIFD 80%80%80%80%80%70%70%
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876 $79,056 $1,443,830 $2,598,667 $3,798,832 $5,063,352 $4,731,261 $5,042,097
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223 $120,622 $2,202,948 $3,964,961 $5,796,133 $7,725,495 $7,289,874 $7,768,808
3/21/2022 Page 1 of 7
Page 374
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
413 units 413 units 413 units
$153,756,504 $156,831,634 $159,968,267
96 units 96 units 96 units
$69,520,531 $70,910,942 $72,329,161
9,200 SF 9,200 SF 9,200 SF
$2,953,519 $3,012,589 $3,072,841
40,000 SF 40,000 SF 40,000 SF
$9,888,805 $10,086,581 $10,288,313
20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF
$4,030,508 $4,111,118 $4,193,341
$240,149,868 $244,952,865 $249,851,923 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,931,552,554 $7,315,136,470 $7,711,291,122 $7,865,516,945 $8,022,827,284 $8,183,283,829 $8,346,949,506 $8,513,888,496
$6,202,110,524 $6,585,694,440 $6,981,849,092 $7,136,074,915 $7,293,385,254 $7,453,841,799 $7,617,507,476 $7,784,446,466
$62,021,105 $65,856,944 $69,818,491 $71,360,749 $72,933,853 $74,538,418 $76,175,075 $77,844,465
$3,222,634 $3,421,946 $3,627,789 $3,707,925 $3,789,664 $3,873,038 $3,958,079 $4,044,821
90%90%90%80%80%80%80%80%
$2,900,371 $3,079,751 $3,265,010 $2,966,340 $3,031,731 $3,098,430 $3,166,463 $3,235,857
$7,661,746 $8,135,605 $8,624,993 $8,815,515 $9,009,847 $9,208,066 $9,410,250 $9,616,477
70%70%70%60%60%60%60%60%
$5,363,222 $5,694,923 $6,037,495 $5,289,309 $5,405,908 $5,524,840 $5,646,150 $5,769,886
$8,263,593 $8,774,675 $9,302,505 $8,255,649 $8,437,639 $8,623,270 $8,812,613 $9,005,743
3/21/2022 Page 2 of 7
Page 375
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$8,684,166,266 $8,857,849,591 $9,035,006,583 $9,215,706,715 $9,400,020,849 $9,588,021,266 $9,779,781,691 $9,975,377,325
$7,954,724,236 $8,128,407,561 $8,305,564,553 $8,486,264,685 $8,670,578,819 $8,858,579,236 $9,050,339,661 $9,245,935,295
$79,547,242 $81,284,076 $83,055,646 $84,862,647 $86,705,788 $88,585,792 $90,503,397 $92,459,353
$4,133,298 $4,223,544 $4,315,595 $4,409,488 $4,505,258 $4,602,943 $4,702,583 $4,804,215
70%70%70%70%70%60%60%60%
$2,893,308 $2,956,481 $3,020,917 $3,086,641 $3,153,680 $2,761,766 $2,821,550 $2,882,529
$9,826,829 $10,041,388 $10,260,238 $10,483,465 $10,711,156 $10,943,402 $11,180,292 $11,421,920
50%50%50%50%50%40%40%40%
$4,913,414 $5,020,694 $5,130,119 $5,241,732 $5,355,578 $4,377,361 $4,472,117 $4,568,768
$7,806,723 $7,977,175 $8,151,036 $8,328,374 $8,509,259 $7,139,127 $7,293,666 $7,451,297
3/21/2022 Page 3 of 7
Page 376
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,174,884,872 $10,378,382,569 $10,585,950,220 $10,797,669,225 $11,013,622,609 $11,233,895,062 $11,458,572,963 $11,687,744,422
$9,445,442,842 $9,648,940,539 $9,856,508,190 $10,068,227,195 $10,284,180,579 $10,504,453,032 $10,729,130,933 $10,958,302,392
$94,454,428 $96,489,405 $98,565,082 $100,682,272 $102,841,806 $105,044,530 $107,291,309 $109,583,024
$4,907,879 $5,013,617 $5,121,470 $5,231,480 $5,343,690 $5,458,144 $5,574,887 $5,693,965
60%60%50%50%50%50%50%40%
$2,944,728 $3,008,170 $2,560,735 $2,615,740 $2,671,845 $2,729,072 $2,787,444 $2,277,586
$11,668,381 $11,919,771 $12,176,188 $12,437,734 $12,704,511 $12,976,624 $13,254,178 $13,537,284
40%40%30%30%30%30%30%20%
$4,667,352 $4,767,908 $3,652,856 $3,731,320 $3,811,353 $3,892,987 $3,976,254 $2,707,457
$7,612,080 $7,776,079 $6,213,592 $6,347,060 $6,483,198 $6,622,059 $6,763,697 $4,985,043
3/21/2022 Page 4 of 7
Page 377
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$11,921,499,310 $12,159,929,297 $12,403,127,883 $12,651,190,440 $12,904,214,249 $13,162,298,534 $13,425,544,505 $13,694,055,395
$11,192,057,280 $11,430,487,267 $11,673,685,853 $11,921,748,410 $12,174,772,219 $12,432,856,504 $12,696,102,475 $12,964,613,365
$111,920,573 $114,304,873 $116,736,859 $119,217,484 $121,747,722 $124,328,565 $126,961,025 $129,646,134
$5,815,425 $5,939,314 $6,065,681 $6,194,575 $6,326,047 $6,460,148 $6,596,931 $6,736,450
40%40%9%9%9%9%9%9%
$2,326,170 $2,375,726 $545,911 $557,512 $569,344 $581,413 $593,724 $606,281
$13,826,052 $14,120,596 $14,421,030 $14,727,473 $15,040,044 $15,358,867 $15,684,067 $16,015,771
20%20%5%5%5%5%5%5%
$2,765,210 $2,824,119 $721,051 $736,374 $752,002 $767,943 $784,203 $800,789
$5,091,381 $5,199,845 $1,266,963 $1,293,885 $1,321,346 $1,349,357 $1,377,927 $1,407,069
3/21/2022 Page 5 of 7
Page 378
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$13,967,936,503 $14,247,295,233 $14,532,241,137 $14,822,885,960 $15,119,343,679 $15,421,730,553 $15,730,165,164 $16,044,768,467
$13,238,494,473 $13,517,853,203 $13,802,799,107 $14,093,443,930 $14,389,901,649 $14,692,288,523 $15,000,723,134 $15,315,326,437
$132,384,945 $135,178,532 $138,027,991 $140,934,439 $143,899,016 $146,922,885 $150,007,231 $153,153,264
$6,878,760 $7,023,915 $7,171,974 $7,322,994 $7,477,034 $7,634,155 $7,794,419 $7,957,888
9%9%9%9%9%9%9%9%
$619,088 $632,152 $645,478 $659,069 $672,933 $687,074 $701,498 $716,210
$16,354,108 $16,699,213 $17,051,219 $17,410,266 $17,776,493 $18,150,045 $18,531,069 $18,919,712
5%5%5%5%5%5%5%5%
$817,705 $834,961 $852,561 $870,513 $888,825 $907,502 $926,553 $945,986
$1,436,794 $1,467,113 $1,498,039 $1,529,583 $1,561,758 $1,594,576 $1,628,051 $1,662,196
3/21/2022 Page 6 of 7
Page 379
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
48 49 50
2070 2071 2072
$0 $0 $0
$16,365,663,837 $16,692,977,113 $17,026,836,656
$15,636,221,807 $15,963,535,083 $16,297,394,626
$156,362,218 $159,635,351 $162,973,946
$8,124,626 $8,294,699 $8,468,173
9%9%9%
$731,216 $746,523 $762,136
$19,316,129 $19,720,474 $20,132,905
5%5%5%
$965,806 $986,024 $1,006,645
$1,697,023 $1,732,547 $1,768,781
3/21/2022 Page 7 of 7
Page 380
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Overview of Fiscal Impacts Key Land Use Assumptions (Stabilized Year 25)
Annual
(Stablized
Year 20)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga For-Sale Residential 1,514 DU
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$25,486,770 $1,620,569,600 $650,817,300 Rental Residential 10,253 DU
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $20,218,100 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600 Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $5,268,670 $362,909,500 $145,587,700 Office 222,000 SF
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Hotel 171 rooms
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$5,795,350 $462,129,400 $171,640,900
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $4,613,300 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to Fire District $1,182,050 $175,149,500 $56,346,100
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Project Component
3/21/2022 Page 1 of 16
Page 381
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of Estimated Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire Fund Stablized
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2062 2072
Stabilized
Escalation
Rate
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value @
3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga Revenues
Property Tax $2,865,700 $3,858,000 $4,259,500 $4,702,900 $5,192,400 $5,732,800 $6,988,200 $8,518,600 2.0%$262,298,600 $111,401,900
Property Tax Allocation to EIFD ($2,865,700)($3,472,200)($3,407,600)($3,292,030)($3,115,440)($2,866,400)($628,938)($766,674)2.0%($102,186,800)($57,115,000)
Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100 $6,707,400 $7,405,512 $9,027,277 $11,004,201 2.0%$338,719,400 $143,809,700
Property Transfer Tax $177,600 $250,300 $276,400 $305,200 $336,900 $371,965 $453,423 $552,720 2.0%$17,015,400 $7,227,400
Sales and Use Tax - Direct / On-Site $4,210,900 $5,091,700 $5,902,700 $6,842,900 $7,932,700 $9,196,173 $12,358,888 $16,609,312 3.0%$428,828,800 $173,618,900
Sales and Use Tax - Indirect / Off-Site $2,113,600 $3,082,000 $3,572,800 $4,141,900 $4,801,600 $5,566,370 $7,480,736 $10,053,484 3.0%$257,590,400 $103,455,900
Transient Occupancy Tax $792,300 $918,500 $1,064,800 $1,234,400 $1,431,000 $1,658,921 $2,229,451 $2,996,196 3.0%$77,389,300 $31,349,600
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $145,500 $188,000 $218,000 $252,700 $293,000 $339,667 $456,484 $613,477 3.0%$15,792,700 $6,374,600
Franchise Fees $940,200 $1,366,300 $1,584,000 $1,836,300 $2,128,700 $2,467,747 $3,316,445 $4,457,025 3.0%$114,228,600 $45,891,600
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$260,400 $338,000 $391,800 $454,200 $526,500 $610,358 $820,270 $1,102,374 3.0%$28,494,100 $11,558,100
Animal Licenses $35,200 $52,100 $60,400 $70,000 $81,200 $94,133 $126,507 $170,015 3.0%$4,351,500 $1,745,700
Fines and Forfeitures $124,700 $181,300 $210,200 $243,600 $282,400 $327,379 $439,970 $591,283 3.0%$15,154,400 $6,088,400
Use of Money and Property $192,900 $280,400 $325,000 $376,800 $436,800 $506,371 $680,520 $914,562 3.0%$23,439,600 $9,417,000
Charges for Services $453,000 $670,200 $776,900 $900,600 $1,044,100 $1,210,398 $1,626,674 $2,186,114 3.0%$55,956,600 $22,448,300
Intergovernmental $26,600 $38,700 $44,900 $52,000 $60,300 $69,904 $93,945 $126,255 3.0%$3,235,900 $1,300,100
Other Revenue $446,700 $649,200 $752,600 $872,400 $1,011,400 $1,172,490 $1,575,728 $2,117,647 3.0%$54,272,800 $21,804,200
Transfers In $213,900 $310,900 $360,400 $417,800 $484,300 $561,436 $754,524 $1,014,017 3.0%$25,988,300 $10,440,900
Estimated Total Revenues $13,820,800 $18,787,100 $21,895,200 $25,486,770 $29,635,260 $34,425,225 $47,800,106 $62,260,607 $1,620,569,600 $650,817,300
City of Rancho Cucamonga Expenditures
Police $5,829,900 $8,472,700 $9,822,200 $11,386,600 $13,200,200 $15,302,650 $20,565,481 $27,638,287 3.0%$708,336,100 $284,575,200
Non-departmental $546,000 $793,400 $919,800 $1,066,300 $1,236,200 $1,433,095 $1,925,959 $2,588,328 3.0%$66,335,200 $26,650,100
City Council $12,800 $18,600 $21,600 $25,000 $29,000 $33,619 $45,181 $60,720 3.0%$1,556,200 $625,200
City Management $100,500 $146,000 $169,300 $196,200 $227,500 $263,735 $354,438 $476,334 3.0%$12,207,800 $4,904,500
City Clerk $200 $300 $300 $400 $400 $464 $623 $838 3.0%$21,600 $8,700
Animal Care and Services $312,100 $461,700 $535,200 $620,500 $719,300 $833,866 $1,120,646 $1,506,054 3.0%$38,549,700 $15,465,100
Records Management $48,400 $70,300 $81,600 $94,500 $109,600 $127,056 $170,753 $229,478 3.0%$5,881,200 $2,362,800
Healthy RC Program $60,700 $89,800 $104,100 $120,700 $139,900 $162,182 $217,960 $292,920 3.0%$7,497,500 $3,007,700
Community Affairs $51,100 $74,200 $86,100 $99,800 $115,700 $134,128 $180,257 $242,250 3.0%$6,208,300 $2,494,100
Admin. Services - Admin $17,800 $25,800 $29,900 $34,700 $40,200 $46,603 $62,630 $84,170 3.0%$2,157,300 $866,800
Business Licensing $27,400 $35,500 $41,200 $47,800 $55,400 $64,224 $86,311 $115,995 3.0%$2,997,700 $1,215,900
City Facilities $94,000 $136,600 $158,300 $183,500 $212,800 $246,694 $331,535 $445,556 3.0%$11,418,700 $4,587,400
Finance $148,900 $216,400 $250,800 $290,800 $337,100 $390,791 $525,191 $705,813 3.0%$18,089,000 $7,267,300
Innovation and Tech Services $364,800 $530,100 $614,600 $712,500 $825,900 $957,444 $1,286,725 $1,729,251 3.0%$44,319,300 $17,805,500
Human Resources $55,600 $80,700 $93,600 $108,500 $125,800 $145,837 $195,992 $263,397 3.0%$6,750,200 $2,711,800
Procurement $24,800 $36,100 $41,800 $48,500 $56,200 $65,151 $87,558 $117,670 3.0%$3,016,200 $1,211,800
Risk Management $27,800 $40,400 $46,800 $54,300 $63,000 $73,034 $98,152 $131,908 3.0%$3,379,800 $1,357,700
Treasury Management $600 $800 $1,000 $1,100 $1,300 $1,507 $2,025 $2,722 3.0%$69,800 $28,000
City Telecommunications $22,500 $32,700 $37,900 $43,900 $50,900 $59,007 $79,301 $106,573 3.0%$2,731,400 $1,097,400
Economic and Comm. Development $82,500 $120,000 $139,100 $161,200 $186,900 $216,668 $291,184 $391,327 3.0%$10,029,300 $4,029,300
Building and Safety $178,000 $258,600 $299,800 $347,600 $403,000 $467,187 $627,861 $843,793 3.0%$21,624,700 $8,687,600
Engineering $239,300 $347,700 $403,100 $467,300 $541,800 $628,095 $844,107 $1,134,409 3.0%$29,072,800 $11,679,900
Fire Facilities Maintenance $34,700 $50,400 $58,400 $67,700 $78,500 $91,003 $122,300 $164,362 3.0%$4,212,200 $1,692,200
City Facilities Maintenance $348,900 $507,100 $587,800 $681,400 $790,000 $915,827 $1,230,794 $1,654,085 3.0%$42,391,900 $17,031,000
Planning $184,000 $267,500 $310,100 $359,500 $416,700 $483,070 $649,205 $872,477 3.0%$22,361,000 $8,983,600
Planning Commission $1,900 $2,800 $3,200 $3,700 $4,300 $4,985 $6,699 $9,003 3.0%$230,700 $92,600
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $110,100 $159,900 $185,400 $215,000 $249,200 $288,891 $388,245 $521,769 3.0%$13,372,100 $5,372,200
Street Maintenance $238,700 $346,900 $402,200 $466,200 $540,500 $626,588 $842,081 $1,131,687 3.0%$29,003,100 $11,651,900
Park Maintenance $295,200 $436,700 $506,300 $586,900 $680,400 $788,770 $1,060,041 $1,424,607 3.0%$36,464,900 $14,628,700
Community Improvement $79,100 $115,000 $133,300 $154,500 $179,200 $207,742 $279,188 $375,205 3.0%$9,615,300 $3,862,800
Community Services $804,600 $1,169,300 $1,355,600 $1,571,500 $1,821,800 $2,111,966 $2,838,305 $3,814,445 3.0%$97,759,100 $39,274,800
Estimated Total Expenditures $10,342,900 $15,044,000 $17,440,400 $20,218,100 $23,438,700 $27,171,877 $36,516,731 $49,075,433 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600
Estimated Annual Net Fiscal Impact $3,477,900 $3,743,100 $4,454,800 $5,268,670 $6,196,560 $7,253,348 $11,283,375 $13,185,174 $362,909,500 $145,587,700
Revenue / Expenditure Ratio 1.34 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.31 1.27 1.29 1.29
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Select years shown for illustration
3/21/2022 Page 2 of 16
Page 382
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of Estimated Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire Fund Stablized
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2062 2072
Stabilized
Escalation
Rate
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value @
3.0%
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Revenues
Property Tax $6,272,400 $8,444,300 $9,323,200 $10,293,500 $11,364,900 $12,547,700 $15,295,600 $18,645,300 2.0%$574,110,900 $243,832,800
Property Tax Allocation to EIFD ($5,017,920)($5,911,010)($5,593,920)($5,146,750)($4,545,960)($3,764,310)($764,780)($932,265)2.0%($152,329,600)($88,401,900)
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $332,100 $482,600 $559,500 $648,600 $751,900 $871,658 $1,171,436 $1,574,312 3.0%$40,348,100 $16,210,000
Estimated Total Revenues $1,586,580 $3,015,890 $4,288,780 $5,795,350 $7,570,840 $9,655,048 $15,702,256 $19,287,347 $462,129,400 $171,640,900
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Expenditures
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300 $5,348,000 $6,199,798 $8,332,010 $11,197,524 3.0%$286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Total Expenditures $2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300 $5,348,000 $6,199,798 $8,332,010 $11,197,524 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Annual Net Fiscal Impact ($775,420)($416,810)$309,380 $1,182,050 $2,222,840 $3,455,250 $7,370,246 $8,089,822 $175,149,500 $56,346,100
Revenue / Expenditure Ratio 0.67 0.88 1.08 1.26 1.42 1.56 1.88 1.72 1.61 1.49
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Select years shown for illustration
3/21/2022 Page 3 of 16
Page 383
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Project Description
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
For-Sale Residential 1,034 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU
Rental Residential 8,186 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU
Total Residential 9,220 DU 11,767 DU 11,767 DU 11,767 DU
Hotel 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms
Commercial / Retail 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Office 22,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF
Industrial 6,172,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF
Annual Escalation Factor 2.0%1.10 1.22 1.35 1.49
Estimated A/V - SF Residential $618K Per Unit $705,605,362 $1,140,691,138 $1,259,415,188 $1,390,496,133
Estimated A/V - MF Residential $317K Per Unit $2,869,024,452 $3,967,476,157 $4,380,414,262 $4,836,331,297
Estimated A/V - Hotel $162K Per Room $30,585,246 $33,768,583 $37,283,245 $41,163,715
Estimated A/V - Retail $274 PSF $265,005,891 $307,952,122 $340,004,027 $375,391,919
Estimated A/V - Office $211 PSF $5,125,143 $57,100,137 $63,043,165 $69,604,748
Estimated A/V - Industrial $172 PSF $1,172,151,995 $1,315,117,221 $1,451,995,677 $1,603,120,553
Total Estimated Assessed Value $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364
Notes:
Adjusted for value appreciation assuming 2% annual escalation rate (statuatory maximum).
Conservatively assuming no mark-to-market valuations above 2% growth to account for property transfers
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
3/21/2022 Page 4 of 16
Page 384
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Project Employment and Occupants
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
Industrial 6,172,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF
Commercial / Retail 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Office 22,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF
Hotel 171 Rooms 171 Rooms 171 Rooms 171 Rooms
For-sale Residential 1,034 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU
Rental Residential 8,186 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU
Estimated # Employees (FTE)
Industrial 1,500 SF / emp 4,115 4,182 4,182 4,182
Commercial / Retail 400 SF / emp 2,190 2,305 2,305 2,305
Office 350 SF / emp 63 634 634 634
Hotel 1.5 room / emp 114 114 114 114
For-sale Residential 0 DU / emp 0 0 0 0
Rental Residential 50 DU / emp 164 205 205 205
Total Estimated # Employees (FTE)6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Occupied Dwelling Units 95%8,759 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU
Residents 2.25 per DU 19,708 25,152 25,152 25,152
Employees Weighted at 50%50%3,323 3,720 3,720 3,720
Total Service Population (Residents + Empl.)23,031 28,872 28,872 28,872
Occupied Hotel Rooms 75%128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms
Hotel Guests 1.5 per room 192 192 192 192
Notes:
Average household size reflects City average household size and product mix of multifamily units
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
3/21/2022 Page 5 of 16
Page 385
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2052 2062 2072
Estimated Assessed Value - Residential $3,574,629,814 $5,108,167,295 $5,639,829,450 $6,226,827,429 $7,590,467,890 $9,252,738,003 $11,279,035,996
Estimated Assessed Value - Non-Residential $1,472,868,276 $1,713,938,063 $1,892,326,113 $2,089,280,935 $2,546,821,801 $3,104,561,565 $3,784,443,224
Total Estimated Assessed Value $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364 $10,137,289,692 $12,357,299,568 $15,063,479,220
Total Secured Property Tax General Levy 1.00%$50,474,981 $68,221,054 $75,321,556 $83,161,084 $101,372,897 $123,572,996 $150,634,792
Estimated Unsecured Property Tax as % of Secured Non-Residential Value 10.00%$1,472,868 $1,713,938 $1,892,326 $2,089,281 $2,546,822 $3,104,562 $3,784,443
Total Estimated Secured + Unsecured Property Tax $51,947,849 $69,934,992 $77,213,882 $85,250,365 $103,919,719 $126,677,557 $154,419,235
Distributions to Taxing Entities
City of Rancho Cucamonga 5.52%$2,865,700 $3,858,000 $4,259,500 $4,702,900 $5,732,800 $6,988,200 $8,518,600
City Allocation to EIFD - Percent 100%90%80%70%50%9%9%
City Allocation to EIFD - Dollar Amount ($2,865,700)($3,472,200)($3,407,600)($3,292,030)($2,866,400)($628,938)($766,674)
Net Property Tax to City $0 $385,800 $851,900 $1,410,870 $2,866,400 $6,359,262 $7,751,926
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District 12.07%$6,272,400 $8,444,300 $9,323,200 $10,293,500 $12,547,700 $15,295,600 $18,645,300
Fire District Allocation to EIFD - Percent 80%70%60%50%30%5%5%
Fire District Allocation to EIFD - Dollar Amount ($5,017,920)($5,911,010)($5,593,920)($5,146,750)($3,764,310)($764,780)($932,265)
Net Property Tax to Fire District $1,254,480 $2,533,290 $3,729,280 $5,146,750 $8,783,390 $14,530,820 $17,713,035
Notes:
General levy distributions represent primary tax rate areas (TRAs) 4000, 4002, 4004, 4058, 4083, 4085, 4008, 4080
Does not include property tax overrides above 1% general levy
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 6 of 16
Page 386
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Tax In-Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fees (MVLF)
Total AV within CITY (FY 2019-20)$27,642,340,160
Current Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF (2019-2020)$20,193,480
Prop Tax In-Lieu of MVLF per $1M of AV $731
Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2023 2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated Project Assessed Value $65,405,338 $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364
Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $47,800 $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100
Net Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $47,800 $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100
Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 7 of 16
Page 387
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Transfer Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated Assessed Value - SF Residential $705,605,362 $1,140,691,138 $1,259,415,188 $1,390,496,133
Estimated Property Turnover Rate 15.0%15.0%15.0%15.0%
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - SF Residential $105,840,804 $171,103,671 $188,912,278 $208,574,420
Estimated Assessed Value - Other $4,341,892,727 $5,681,414,220 $6,272,740,375 $6,925,612,231
Estimated Property Turnover Rate 5.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - Other $217,094,636 $284,070,711 $313,637,019 $346,280,612
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - Total $322,935,441 $455,174,382 $502,549,297 $554,855,031
Total Transfer Tax $1.10 per $1,000 $35,522,900 $50,069,200 $55,280,400 $61,034,100
Transfer Tax to City $0.55 per $1,000 $177,600 $250,300 $276,400 $305,200
Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 8 of 16
Page 388
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Sales Tax - Direct / On-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
Retail SF 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Industrial SF Assumed to Generate Local Sales Tax Allocation 308,620 SF 313,620 SF 313,620 SF 313,620 SF
Total Sales-Generating SF 1,184,620 SF 1,235,620 SF 1,235,620 SF 1,235,620 SF
Estimated Taxable Sales $275 PSF $377,657,422 $456,656,886 $529,390,489 $613,708,669
Sales Tax to City 1.00%$3,776,574 $4,566,569 $5,293,905 $6,137,087
Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 11.50%$434,306 $525,155 $608,799 $705,765
Sales and Use Tax to City - Direct $4,210,900 $5,091,700 $5,902,700 $6,842,900
Notes:
Analysis assumes approximately 10% of industrial uses will generate locally allocated sales tax. Based on Kosmont research, local allocation varies widely according to various factors,
such as location of seller's registered office of business, location of goods at time of sale, and method of delivery to the customer. Sales may be allocated to the jurisdiction of the
fulfillment center, the jurisdiction of the seller's registered office, or the Countywide pool.
County sales tax for transportation based on Measure I (0.5%), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%)
Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales)
Taxable sales PSF factor escalated 3% annually
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 9 of 16
Page 389
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Sales Tax - Indirect / Off-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Employees 6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Empl.$6,701 $7,768 $9,005 $10,439
Estimated Employee Taxable Retail Spending $44,528,971 $57,792,325 $66,997,144 $77,668,052
Estimated Capture within City 50.0%$22,264,485 $28,896,162 $33,498,572 $38,834,026
Estimated # Occupied Dwelling Units 8,759 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / HH $40,323 $46,745 $54,190 $62,822
Estimated Resident Taxable Retail Spending $353,187,309 $522,547,826 $605,776,148 $702,260,583
Estimated Capture within City 50.0%$176,593,654 $261,273,913 $302,888,074 $351,130,291
Estimated # Occupied Hotel Rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Room $21,157 $24,526 $28,433 $32,962
Estimated Resident Taxable Retail Spending $2,713,353 $3,145,520 $3,646,520 $4,227,316
Estimated Capture within City 25.0%$678,338 $786,380 $911,630 $1,056,829
Total Estimated Indirect Taxable Sales $199,536,478 $290,956,456 $337,298,276 $391,021,146
Less Estimated Capture Within District Retail (5.0%)($9,976,824)($14,547,823)($16,864,914)($19,551,057)
Net Indirect Taxable Sales $189,559,654 $276,408,633 $320,433,362 $371,470,089
Sales Tax to City 1.00%$1,895,597 $2,764,086 $3,204,334 $3,714,701
Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 11.50%$217,994 $317,870 $368,498 $427,191
Sales and Use Tax to City - Indirect $2,113,600 $3,082,000 $3,572,800 $4,141,900
Notes:
County sales tax for transportation based on Measure I (0.5%), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%)
Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales)
Employee spending estimates based on "Office Worker Retail Spending Patterns: A Downtown and Suburban Area Study," ICSC (2004).
Household spending based on average houshold income within City.
Hotel guest spending estimated based on American Hotel and Lodging Association (AHLA) data.
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 10 of 16
Page 390
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") to City
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Hotel Rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms
Average Daily Room Rate (ADR)$174 $202 $234 $271
Average Occupancy Rate 73%73%73%73%
Annual Hotel Room Receipts $7,922,992 $9,184,919 $10,647,839 $12,343,763
TOT to City 10.00%$792,300 $918,500 $1,064,800 $1,234,400
Notes:
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 11 of 16
Page 391
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Service Population
City Population 175,131
City Employee Population 79,840
Employee Weighting for Service Population 0.5
Weighted # Employees 39,920
Total Service Population 215,051
Source: CA Department of Finance, CA Employment Development Department (2021)
3/21/2022 Page 12 of 16
Page 392
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Multipler Revenue and Expenditure Factors
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Budget Category
Adopted City
Budget Allocation Basis
Relevant City
Population /
Factor
Discount for
Operational
Efficiency
Per Capita
Factor
Annual
Escalation 2027 2032 2037 2042
Revenues
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $735,370 As % of Total Sales Tax $31,965,020 0%2.30%N/A 2.30%2.30%2.30%2.30%
Franchise Fees $7,572,760 Service Population 215,051 0%$35.21 3.0%$40.82 $47.32 $54.86 $63.60
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$2,698,710 Per Employee 79,840 0%$33.80 3.0%$39.19 $45.43 $52.66 $61.05
Animal Licenses $270,000 Per Resident 175,131 0%$1.54 3.0%$1.79 $2.07 $2.40 $2.78
Fines and Forfeitures $1,004,750 Service Population 215,051 0%$4.67 3.0%$5.42 $6.28 $7.28 $8.44
Use of Money and Property $1,553,990 Service Population 215,051 0%$7.23 3.0%$8.38 $9.71 $11.26 $13.05
Charges for Services $3,472,090 Per Resident 175,131 0%$19.83 3.0%$22.98 $26.64 $30.89 $35.81
Intergovernmental $214,580 Service Population 215,051 0%$1.00 3.0%$1.16 $1.34 $1.55 $1.80
Other Revenue $3,598,000 Service Population 215,051 0%$16.73 3.0%$19.40 $22.48 $26.07 $30.22
Transfers In $1,722,910 Service Population 215,051 0%$8.01 3.0%$9.29 $10.77 $12.48 $14.47
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $2,674,960 Service Population 215,051 0%$12.44 3.0%$14.42 $16.72 $19.38 $22.47
Total Selected Revenues $25,518,120
Expenditures
Police $46,958,580 Service Population 215,051 0%$218.36 3.0%$253.14 $293.46 $340.20 $394.38
Non-departmental $5,863,390 Service Population 215,051 25%$20.45 3.0%$23.71 $27.48 $31.86 $36.93
City Council $137,600 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.48 3.0%$0.56 $0.64 $0.75 $0.87
City Management $1,079,110 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.76 3.0%$4.36 $5.06 $5.86 $6.80
City Clerk $1,980 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.01 3.0%$0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01
Animal Care and Services $3,189,380 Per Resident 175,131 25%$13.66 3.0%$15.83 $18.36 $21.28 $24.67
Records Management $519,850 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.81 3.0%$2.10 $2.44 $2.82 $3.27
Healthy RC Program $620,230 Per Resident 175,131 25%$2.66 3.0%$3.08 $3.57 $4.14 $4.80
Community Affairs $548,640 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.91 3.0%$2.22 $2.57 $2.98 $3.46
Admin. Services - Admin $190,750 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.67 3.0%$0.77 $0.89 $1.04 $1.20
Business Licensing $378,360 Per Employee 79,840 25%$3.55 3.0%$4.12 $4.78 $5.54 $6.42
City Facilities $1,009,270 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.52 3.0%$4.08 $4.73 $5.48 $6.36
Finance $1,598,930 Service Population 215,051 25%$5.58 3.0%$6.46 $7.49 $8.69 $10.07
Innovation and Tech Services $3,917,550 Service Population 215,051 25%$13.66 3.0%$15.84 $18.36 $21.29 $24.68
Human Resources $596,590 Service Population 215,051 25%$2.08 3.0%$2.41 $2.80 $3.24 $3.76
Procurement $266,770 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.93 3.0%$1.08 $1.25 $1.45 $1.68
Risk Management $298,600 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.04 3.0%$1.21 $1.40 $1.62 $1.88
Treasury Management $6,140 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.02 3.0%$0.02 $0.03 $0.03 $0.04
City Telecommunications $241,490 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.84 3.0%$0.98 $1.13 $1.31 $1.52
Economic and Comm. Development $886,470 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.09 3.0%$3.58 $4.15 $4.82 $5.58
Building and Safety $1,911,330 Service Population 215,051 25%$6.67 3.0%$7.73 $8.96 $10.39 $12.04
Engineering $2,569,690 Service Population 215,051 25%$8.96 3.0%$10.39 $12.04 $13.96 $16.19
Fire Facilities Maintenance $372,330 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.30 3.0%$1.51 $1.75 $2.02 $2.35
City Facilities Maintenance $3,747,020 Service Population 215,051 25%$13.07 3.0%$15.15 $17.56 $20.36 $23.60
Planning $1,976,590 Service Population 215,051 25%$6.89 3.0%$7.99 $9.26 $10.74 $12.45
Planning Commission $20,390 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.07 3.0%$0.08 $0.10 $0.11 $0.13
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $1,181,990 Service Population 215,051 25%$4.12 3.0%$4.78 $5.54 $6.42 $7.45
Street Maintenance $2,563,580 Service Population 215,051 25%$8.94 3.0%$10.36 $12.02 $13.93 $16.15
Park Maintenance $3,016,970 Per Resident 175,131 25%$12.92 3.0%$14.98 $17.36 $20.13 $23.34
Community Improvement $849,820 Service Population 215,051 25%$2.96 3.0%$3.44 $3.98 $4.62 $5.35
Community Services $8,641,020 Service Population 215,051 25%$30.14 3.0%$34.94 $40.50 $46.95 $54.43
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$38,050,430 Service Population 215,051 50%$88.47 3.0%$102.56 $118.89 $137.83 $159.78
Total Selected Expenditures $133,210,840
Notes:
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax
Non-recurring licenses and permits excluded (e.g. building permits)
Non-recurring charges for services excluded (e.g. plan check and engineering fees)
Fire Fund other revenues excluding property tax
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021-2022 Adopted Budget
3/21/2022 Page 13 of 16
Page 393
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Multipler Revenues and Expenditures
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Residents 19,708 25,152 25,152 25,152
Estimated # Employees 6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Total Project Service Population 23,031 28,872 28,872 28,872
Budget Category 2027 2032 2037 2042
Revenues
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $145,500 $188,000 $218,000 $252,700
Franchise Fees $940,200 $1,366,300 $1,584,000 $1,836,300
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$260,400 $338,000 $391,800 $454,200
Animal Licenses $35,200 $52,100 $60,400 $70,000
Fines and Forfeitures $124,700 $181,300 $210,200 $243,600
Use of Money and Property $192,900 $280,400 $325,000 $376,800
Charges for Services $453,000 $670,200 $776,900 $900,600
Intergovernmental $26,600 $38,700 $44,900 $52,000
Other Revenue $446,700 $649,200 $752,600 $872,400
Transfers In $213,900 $310,900 $360,400 $417,800
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $332,100 $482,600 $559,500 $648,600
Total Multiplier Revenues $3,171,200 $4,557,700 $5,283,700 $6,125,000
Expenditures
Police $5,829,900 $8,472,700 $9,822,200 $11,386,600
Non-departmental $546,000 $793,400 $919,800 $1,066,300
City Council $12,800 $18,600 $21,600 $25,000
City Management $100,500 $146,000 $169,300 $196,200
City Clerk $200 $300 $300 $400
Animal Care and Services $312,100 $461,700 $535,200 $620,500
Records Management $48,400 $70,300 $81,600 $94,500
Healthy RC Program $60,700 $89,800 $104,100 $120,700
Community Affairs $51,100 $74,200 $86,100 $99,800
Admin. Services - Admin $17,800 $25,800 $29,900 $34,700
Business Licensing $27,400 $35,500 $41,200 $47,800
City Facilities $94,000 $136,600 $158,300 $183,500
Finance $148,900 $216,400 $250,800 $290,800
Innovation and Tech Services $364,800 $530,100 $614,600 $712,500
Human Resources $55,600 $80,700 $93,600 $108,500
Procurement $24,800 $36,100 $41,800 $48,500
Risk Management $27,800 $40,400 $46,800 $54,300
Treasury Management $600 $800 $1,000 $1,100
City Telecommunications $22,500 $32,700 $37,900 $43,900
Economic and Comm. Development $82,500 $120,000 $139,100 $161,200
Building and Safety $178,000 $258,600 $299,800 $347,600
Engineering $239,300 $347,700 $403,100 $467,300
Fire Facilities Maintenance $34,700 $50,400 $58,400 $67,700
City Facilities Maintenance $348,900 $507,100 $587,800 $681,400
Planning $184,000 $267,500 $310,100 $359,500
Planning Commission $1,900 $2,800 $3,200 $3,700
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $110,100 $159,900 $185,400 $215,000
Street Maintenance $238,700 $346,900 $402,200 $466,200
Park Maintenance $295,200 $436,700 $506,300 $586,900
Community Improvement $79,100 $115,000 $133,300 $154,500
Community Services $804,600 $1,169,300 $1,355,600 $1,571,500
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300
Total Multiplier Expenditures $12,704,900 $18,476,700 $21,419,800 $24,831,400
Notes:
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax
Non-recurring licenses and permits excluded (e.g. building permits)
Non-recurring charges for services excluded (e.g. plan check and engineering fees)
Fire Fund other revenues excluding property tax
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021-2022 Adopted Budget
3/21/2022 Page 14 of 16
Page 394
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
IMPLAN Inputs
Construction Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Industry Spending)
58 - Construction of new multifamily residential structures $3,254,712,320
57 - Construction of new single family residential structures $935,764,036
55 - Construction of new commercial structures, including farm structures $327,172,000
51 - Construction of new manufacturing structures $1,078,854,176
Ongoing Operation Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Employment Change)
470 - Office administrative services 634 Jobs
412 - Retail - Miscellaneous store retailers 2,305 Jobs
422 - Warehousing and storage 4,182 Jobs
448 - Tenant-occupied housing 205 Jobs
507 - Hotels and motels, including casino hotels 114 Jobs
3/21/2022 Page 15 of 16
Page 395
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of IMPLAN Economic Benefits
Economic Benefits from Construction (One-Time / Short-Term)
Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site)53,072 $3,590,719,145 $5,596,502,532
Indirect 4,416 $233,897,654 $705,771,484
Induced 11,965 $556,461,858 $1,812,629,755
Total Countywide 69,452 $4,381,078,657 $8,114,903,770
Estimated City Capture 53,891 $3,630,237,121 $5,722,422,594
Economic Benefits from Ongoing Operation (Annual)
Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site)7,440 $323,914,005 $757,152,868
Indirect 1,411 $66,532,298 $202,224,372
Induced 1,163 $54,129,137 $176,526,832
Total Countywide 10,015 $444,575,439 $1,135,904,072
Estimated City Capture 7,569 $329,947,077 $776,090,428
Notes
100% of direct benefits estimated to be captured on-site within the City.
5% of indirect and induced benefits estimated to be captured off-site within the City.
Estimated ongoing benefits upon build-out and stabilization.
3/21/2022 Page 16 of 16
Page 396
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVING THE INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCING PLAN FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT AND THE ALLOCATION OF THE
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT’S INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
53398.68 AND 53398.75
WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted California Government Code sections
53398.50 through 53398.88 (“EIFD Law”) authorizing cities and counties to form enhanced
infrastructure financing districts within defined areas and use incremental property tax revenue
generated from the growth in property taxes collected from within such districts to finance certain
infrastructure and community benefit projects; and
WHEREAS, in enacting the EIFD Law, the California Legislature found and determined
that with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, public benefits will accrue if local agencies
are provided a means to finance certain public infrastructure and community benefit projects
authorized under the EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2022-029 (“Resolution of Intention”), which initiated the
process to establish the Rancho Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD”) pursuant to EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council found that the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is necessary for the area within the boundaries of the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) and declared that, pursuant to the
EIFD Law, if approved by resolution pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.68, incremental
property tax revenue from the City within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may be used to finance
the activities described in the Resolution of Intention; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council established the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public Financing Authority (“PFA”) to serve as the governing board of
the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; and
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.63, the PFA
directed the Executive Director of the PFA to prepare a draft Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”)
for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, which IFP is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and is available for
inspection at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA,
91730; and
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 397
-2-
WHEREAS, the IFP, among other things, includes a description of the public facilities to
be financed by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and a financing section that includes, among other
things, a specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City and of
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) proposed to be committed to the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD for each year during which the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will receive
incremental tax revenue, and a projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received
by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD in each year during which the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will
receive tax revenues, including an estimate of the amount of tax revenues attributable to the City
and to the District for each year; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, the Board adopted Resolution No. FD2022-003
declaring that the District intends to participate in the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD as described in
the Resolution of Intention as a taxing entity providing that the Board approved the IFP at a later
date; and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.63, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 22-08, finding
that the facilities to be financed pursuant to the IFP are consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the PFA held a public meeting to present the IFP and on
May 10, 2022, the PFA held a public hearing to consider oral and written comments to the IFP;
and
WHEREAS, the Board now desires to adopt this Resolution pursuant to Government Code
Section 53398.68 to approve the IFP, substantially in the form prepared by the Executive Director
of the PFA, including the allocation of incremental tax revenue of the District in accordance with
Government Code Section 53398.75 as set forth in the IFP;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District hereby resolves as follows:
Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. The Board hereby approves the IFP for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
substantially in the form presented to the Board and attached hereto as “Exhibit A”, including, but
not limited to, the specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the
District to be committed to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD for each year during which the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD will receive incremental tax revenue.
Section 3. The District Secretary and all other officers and agents of the District, are
hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the
transactions contemplated by this Resolution.
Page 398
-3-
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
Board and the District Secretary shall cause a copy thereof to be forwarded to the PFA.
Section 5. The District Secretary District shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th Day of MAY, 2022:
________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST: ____________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, District Secretary
I, Janice C. Reynolds, District Secretary, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held on the 18th day of May, 2022, by the
following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS:
Executed on this 18th day of May, 2022 at Rancho Cucamonga, California
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk
Page 399
-4-
Exhibit A
Infrastructure Financing Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure
Financing District
Page 400
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN
APRIL 2022
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 401
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 2
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Description of the Proposed District ..................................................................................... 7
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities and Development ........................................................... 8
4.0 Finding of Communitywide Significance ............................................................................ 12
5.0 Financing Section ............................................................................................................... 13
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and Replacement Housing Plan .............................................. 18
7.0 Goals of the District ............................................................................................................ 19
8.0 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 20
Index of Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix E: City General Plan Environmental Impact Report
Page 402
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 3
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background & Purpose
Background. Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2022-029, which was adopted by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 16, 2022 (the “Resolution of Intention”) and Part 1
of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the “EIFD Law”), the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”) declared its intention to establish the Rancho
Cucamonga Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Rancho Cucamonga EIFD” or “District”).
Pursuant to the same Resolution No. 2022-029, which was adopted by the City Council on
February 16, 2022, the City Council of the City established the “Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public
Financing Authority” (“PFA”) as the governing body of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Pursuant to its Resolution No. FD 2022-003, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District on February 16, 2022 and the EIFD Law, the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“Fire District”) declared its intention to participate in the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and newly formed PFA.
At its inaugural meeting on March 8, 2022, the PFA directed its Executive Director, who is the
City Manager of the City, to prepare an infrastructure financing plan (“IFP”) for the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD.
Purpose of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is intended to serve
as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative
potential for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD area and the City as a whole. The Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD encompasses approximately 1,500 acres of land, representing approximately 6.0% of the
total approximately 25,677 acres in the City limits. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD includes various
non-contiguous, largely undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels with significant potential for new
development and/or rehabilitation. These areas were chosen based on their capacity to benefit
from catalytic infrastructure improvements with communitywide significance and regional benefit.
1.2 Contents and Overview of this Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”)
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 53398.59 through 53398.74, this IFP includes the
following information:
a) A map and legal description of the District, included herein as Appendix A and Appendix
B, respectively.
Page 403
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 4
b) A description of the public facilities and other forms of development or financial assistance
that is proposed in the area of the District, including those to be provided by the private
sector, those to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District,
those public improvements and facilities to be financed with assistance from the proposed
District, and those to be provided jointly. The description includes the proposed location,
timing, and costs of the development and financial assistance. This information is
included in Section 3 of this IFP.
c) A finding that the development and financial assistance are of communitywide
significance and provide significant benefits to an area larger than the area of the District.
This information is included in Section 4 of this IFP.
d) A financing section (included in Section 5 of this IFP), which contains all of the following
information:
1) A specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City
and Fire District proposed to be committed to the District for each year during
which the District will receive incremental tax revenue. The portion may change
over time. Section 5.1 and Table 3 of this IFP details the maximum portion of the
incremental property tax revenue of the City and Fire District proposed to be
committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime, which is
projected to be forty-five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds
is approved by the PFA. In summary, the maximum portion of the City’s property
tax increment is 100% for initial years following formation of the District,
decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 9% at District termination. The
maximum portion of the Fire District’s property tax increment is 80% for initial
years following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to
approximately 5% at District termination. The proposed contribution scenario is
intended to focus on funding debt service for bonds issued approximately four to
six years following District formation, as well as maintenance of funded
infrastructure improvements.
2) A projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received by the District
in each year during which the District will receive tax revenues. Section 5.2 and
Table 3 of this IFP includes a projection of tax revenues to be received by the
District by year over the course of the District’s lifetime, as described in the
previous paragraph. These projections are based on research and analysis of
available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual
results may differ from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides
additional detail for the projected revenue analysis. See paragraph 5 below for the
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD termination date.
Page 404
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 5
3) A plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District, including a
detailed description of any intention to incur debt. Section 5.4 of this IFP includes
a plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District. The PFA
intends to incur debt only when it is financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at
this time that the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will provide funding for approximately
$100 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement costs from a
combination of tax increment bond or loan proceeds (multiple issuances may be
necessary) and pay-as-you-go tax increment funding over the District lifetime.
4) A limit on the total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District
pursuant to the plan. The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to
the District shall not exceed $500,000,000 in nominal dollars.
5) A date on which the District will cease to exist, by which time all tax allocation to
the district will end. The date shall not be more than 45 years from the date on
which the issuance of bonds is approved pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section
53398.81, or the issuance of a loan is approved by the governing board of a local
agency pursuant to Section 53398.87. The District will cease to exist on the earlier
of: (i) forty-five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds is
approved by the PFA, or (ii) June 30, 2072. This IFP assumes that the District will
be formed in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and will begin receiving tax revenues in Fiscal
Year 2022-2023.
6) An analysis of the costs to the City of providing facilities and services to the area
of the District while the area is being developed and after the area is developed.
The plan shall also include an analysis of the tax, fee, charge, and other revenues
expected to be received by the City as a result of expected development in the
area of the District. Appendix D to this IFP includes, as part of the Fiscal Impact
Analysis, an analysis of the costs to the City for providing facilities and services to
the area of the District. Appendix D also includes an analysis of the tax, fee,
charge, and other revenues expected to be received by the City as a result of
expected development in the area of the District. It is estimated that, at Year 20
of the District lifetime (assumed stabilized buildout of the District area), annual
costs to the City will be approximately $20.2 million and annual revenues are
approximately $25.5 million. Additionally, annual costs to the Fire District at Year
20 are estimated at $4.6 million and annual revenues are approximately $5.8
million.
7) An analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated
development upon the City and the Fire District. Appendix D to this IFP includes
an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated
development upon the City and the Fire District, as the only affected taxing entities
that are contributing tax increment revenues to the District at this time. It is
Page 405
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 6
estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime, the District area will generate an
annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $5.3 million to the City and an annual
net fiscal surplus of approximately $1.2 million to the Fire District.
8) A plan for financing any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a
developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of that
District and qualifies for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section
65470, including any permit and affordable housing expenses related to the
project. At this time, the PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that
may be incurred by reimbursing a developer of a project that is both located
entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies for the Transit Priority
Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470.
e) If any dwelling units within the territory of the District are proposed to be removed or
destroyed in the course of public works construction within the area of the district or
private development within the area of the district that is subject to a written agreement
with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the District, a plan providing for
replacement of those units and relocation of those persons or families consistent with the
requirements of Section 53398.56. The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units
will be removed as a result of any project identified in this IFP. However, if any relocation
of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a project financed by the
District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code Section
53398.56.
f) The goals the District proposes to achieve for each project financed pursuant to Section
53398.52. Section 7 of this IFP summarizes the goals of each project to be financed by
the District.
Page 406
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 7
2.0 Description of the Proposed District
The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD encompasses approximately 1,500 acres of land, representing
approximately 6.0% of the total approximately 25,677 acres within the City limits. The Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD includes various non-contiguous, largely undeveloped or underdeveloped
parcels with significant potential for new development and/or rehabilitation. These areas were
chosen based on their capacity to benefit from catalytic infrastructure improvements with
communitywide significance and regional benefit.
Land use designations in the District primarily include residential, commercial / hotel / retail /
office, industrial, and several public use parcels. Appendix A includes a map of the proposed
District, and Appendix B is a legal description of the District.
Page 407
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 8
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities
and Development
3.1 Anticipated Future Private Development
Anticipated future private development within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is summarized in
Table 1 below, with greater detail provided in Appendix C. Buildout and absorption of these land
uses are forecasted in the first 20 years of the District lifetime.
Table 1: Anticipated Future Private Development
Development Type SF / Units AV Per SF / Unit
Estimated AV at
Buildout
(2022 Nominal
Value)
For-sale Residential 1,514 units $618,074 per unit $936 million
Rental Residential 10,253 units $317,440 per unit $3.255 billion
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF $274 PSF $253 million
Office 222,000 SF $211 PSF $47 million
Industrial 6,272,400 SF $172 PSF $1.079 billion
Hotel 171 rooms $162,000 per room $28 million
Estimated Total
$5.597 billion
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Economic Development Staff, CoStar Property (2022)
3.2 Public Facilities to be Financed with Assistance from the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
The EIFD Law authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD to finance the purchase, construction,
expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property
with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer, if they are of communitywide significance and
provide significant benefits to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or the surrounding community.
The PFA intends to utilize the District to fund infrastructure projects of communitywide significance
that provide significant benefits to the region over the District lifetime. Table 2 identifies the
targeted infrastructure improvements to receive EIFD funding over the District’s lifetime.
Page 408
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 9
Table 2: Potential Priority Projects for Receipt of EIFD Funding
# PROJECT ESTIMATED
COST
ESTIMATED
TIMING
1
Parking infrastructure and related improvements
between Haven Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard
along Foothill Corridor
$20-40 million 2028-2032
2 Transportation Connectivity Improvements linking
Cucamonga Station and Haven / Arrow focus area $40-60 million 2028-2032
Estimated Total Priority Projects $60-100 million
Additional expenditures by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, including any use of potential future
EIFD bond proceeds, will be subject to approval by the PFA. Eligible expenditures in accordance
with Government Code sections 53398.52 and 53398.56 include the purchase, construction,
expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property
with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer and are projects of communitywide significance
that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community. The Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD may also finance the ongoing or capitalized costs to maintain public capital
facilities financed in whole or in part by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. Facilities funded may be
located outside the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, as long as they have a tangible
connection to the work of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. The Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will also
finance planning and design activities that are directly related to the purchase, construction,
expansion, or rehabilitation of these projects. Projects financed by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
may include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
Highways, interchanges, and ramps;
Bridges;
Arterial streets;
Parking facilities;
Transit facilities;
Parks, recreational facilities, and open space;
Sewage treatment and water reclamation plants and interceptor pipes;
Facilities for the collection and treatment of water for urban uses;
Facilities for the transfer and disposal of solid waste, including transfer stations and
vehicles;
Storm water conveyance and collection facilities;
Flood control levees and dams, retention basins, and drainage channels;
Child care facilities;
Libraries;
Broadband and telecommunications infrastructure;
Sidewalks and streetscape improvements;
Bicycle lanes and paths;
Public art;
Page 409
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 10
Corporation yards;
Police facilities;
Brownfield restoration and other environmental mitigation;
Affordable housing as authorized under the EIFD Law;
Projects that implement a sustainable communities strategy and transit priority projects;
Acquisition, construction, or repair of industrial structures for private use;
Acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business
occupant of such structures, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of
fostering economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and of ensuring the long-term
economic sustainability of small businesses;
Projects that enable communities to adapt to the impacts of climate change, including, but
not limited to, higher average temperatures, decreased air and water quality, the spread
of infectious and vector-borne diseases, other public health impacts, extreme weather
events, sea level rise, flooding, heat waves, wildfires, and drought;
Facilities in which nonprofit community organizations provide health, youth, homeless, and
social services.
Other Expenses: In addition to the direct costs of the above facilities, the Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD may finance the costs of planning and design work that is directly related to the purchase,
construction, expansion or rehabilitation of property, including, but not limited to, the cost of
environmental evaluation and engineering and surveying costs; environmental remediation costs;
construction staking costs; utility relocation and demolition costs incidental to the construction of
the facilities; costs of legal services; and costs of project/construction management.
In addition, the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may finance any other expenses incidental to the
formation, administration1 and implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD and to the
construction, completion, inspection and acquisition of the authorized facilities, including, but not
limited to, the costs of creation and administration of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; costs of
issuance of bonds or other debt of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or of any other public agency
(including a community facilities district) that finances authorized facilities, and payment of debt
service thereon; financing costs of improvements incurred by developers until reimbursement for
the costs of the improvements from the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; costs incurred by the City,
1 Administration costs refer to the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of the Rancho
Cucamonga EIFD, including, but not limited to, the following: the costs of computing annual tax increment revenues and
preparing the required annual reporting; the costs of allocation tax increment revenues (whether by the County, the City,
or otherwise); the costs to the City, Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, or any designee thereof in complying with disclosure
requirements; the costs associated with preparing required disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries
regarding the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD; and the costs of the City, Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, or any designee thereof
related to any appeal of the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD. Administration costs shall also include
amounts estimated or advanced by the City for any other administrative purposes, including, but not limited to, attorney’s
fees or any other expenses incidental to the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Page 410
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 11
Fire District, or the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD in connection with the division of taxes pursuant to
Government Code section 53398.75; and legal costs.
Targeted improvements would conform to established guidelines in adopted planning
documentation, such as the City General Plan.
The PFA intends to continue to identify, evaluate, and pursue additional funding sources and
financing mechanisms aside from District tax increment to implement the improvements identified
above, potentially including grant sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District), impact fees, private sector investment incentivized by the formation
of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD itself, and/or other sources.
Private sector developers will be responsible for funding project-specific / fair-share / in-tract
infrastructure. Some public facilities included in the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD area are
anticipated to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District. There
are no public facilities anticipated to be provided jointly by the private sector and governmental
entities; however, it is possible that private sector developers may advance funding for
improvements, and those advances may be partially reimbursed with EIFD proceeds. Such case-
specific agreements would come before the PFA for approval at the appropriate time.
In accordance with Government Code Section 53398.69, the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD may
expend up to 10 percent of any accrued tax increment in the first two years of the effective date
of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD on planning and dissemination of information to the residents
within the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD boundaries about the IFP and planned activities to be funded
by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, including reimbursement of the City’s advanced funding of such
eligible costs.
In addition, in accordance with Government Code Section 53398.76, costs incurred by the County
of San Bernardino in connection with the division of taxes for the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD are
eligible to be paid by the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
Page 411
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 12
4.0 Finding of Communitywide
Significance
Implementation of the District promotes the goals of and is consistent with the City’s General Plan,
facilitates implementation of regional connectivity through various modes of transportation, and
provides the infrastructure foundation for the development of critically needed housing in the
community and greater region.
The District supports job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life, and
promotion of environmental sustainability.
Specific communitywide and regional benefits anticipated to be generated by the District include:
Approx. $146 million in net fiscal impact to the City over 50 years (on a present-value
basis)
Approx. $57 million in net fiscal impact to the Fire District over 50 years (on a present-
value basis)
Approx. 11,767 housing units within the District upon buildout and stabilization
69,452 direct, indirect, and induced temporary, construction-related job-years2 in the City
and County
7,440 direct, permanent jobs in the City upon buildout and stabilization
2,575 additional indirect and induced permanent jobs in the City and County (total of
10,015 direct, indirect, and induced jobs) upon buildout and stabilization
$8.115 billion in economic output from construction in the City and County
$1.136 billion in annual ongoing economic output in the City and County upon buildout
and stabilization.
2 A job-year is defined as one year of employment for one employee. Over a 20-year construction period, 69,452 job-years
translates into approximately 3,473 annual average jobs.
Page 412
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 13
5.0 Financing Section
Projections included in this IFP are based on research and analysis of available data at the time
of IFP for purposes of planning and illustration. Actual results may differ from those expressed in
this document.
Aside from the City and Fire District, no other taxing entity is allocating property tax increment to
the District at this time. It is anticipated that property tax increment will be utilized on both a “pay-
as-you-go” basis as well as security for tax increment bond issuance or loan acquisition.
Definition of Tax Increment. For purposes of clarity, the phrases “tax increment,” “incremental
property tax” and “incremental tax revenue”, as used in this IFP and the EIFD Law, refer to the
portion of future property tax revenue described in Section 53398.75(a)(2) of the EIFD Law, i.e.,
the difference between (A) and (B) in the following formula:
(A) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year during
the term of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable
property in the EIFD in each such year minus
(B) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied upon the total
sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD as shown
upon the last equalized roll prior to the effective date of the resolution adopted pursuant to Section
53398.69 of the EIFD Law to create the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
In the case of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD, the resolution adopted pursuant to Section 53398.69
was [is expected to be] adopted on July 19, 2022, and the last equalized roll prior to the effective
date of that resolution is the roll for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Fiscal Year 2021-22 is referred to as
the “base year.” The assessed value of the taxable property shown in such last equalized roll is
approximately $729 million. This value is referred to as the “base year value”.
Overlap with Boundaries of former Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD includes overlap with former Redevelopment Project Area boundaries
of the former Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and so property tax revenues
generated by the properties within the overlapping area will flow according to the Redevelopment
Agency dissolution statutes until all of the Successor Agency’s obligations are retired and the
Successor Agency is dissolved (currently anticipated by 2034). The City and Fire District
anticipate allocating Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) residual revenues to the
District as part of the maximum allocations outlined in the following sections. As such, the exhibits
included in this plan reflect such allocations.
Page 413
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 14
Where the District boundaries overlap with the boundaries of the former Redevelopment Project
Area, any debt or obligation of a District shall be subordinate to any and all enforceable obligations
of the former Redevelopment Agency, as approved by the Oversight Board and the Department
of Finance.
5.1 Maximum Portion of Incremental Tax Revenue Dedicated to the District
Table 3 details the maximum portion of the incremental property tax revenue of the City and Fire
District proposed to be committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime. In
summary, the maximum portion of the City’s property tax increment is 100% for initial years
following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 9% at District
termination. The maximum portion of the Fire District’s property tax increment is 80% for initial
years following formation of the District, decreasing in a gradual manner to approximately 5% at
District termination. The proposed contribution scenario is intended to focus on funding debt
service for bonds issued approximately four to six years following District formation, as well as
maintenance of funded infrastructure improvements.
5.2 Projection of District Tax Revenues by Year
Table 3 provides an overview of the projected growth of assessed value, property tax increment,
and City and Fire District allocations to the District over the District lifetime. It is expected that a
total of approximately $255,688,000 of incremental tax revenues will be allocated to the District
over the District lifetime (approximately $97,757,000 from the City and approximately
$157,931,000 from the Fire District). These projections are based on research and analysis of
available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual results may differ
from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides additional detail for the projected
revenue analysis.
5.3 Plan for Financing Public Facilities
The PFA intends to utilize numerous funding sources and financing mechanisms to implement
the improvements identified in Section 3.2, potentially including District tax increment, grant
sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Community Facilities District), impact fees,
private sector investment incentivized by the formation of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD itself,
and/or other sources.
As it pertains to the use of District tax increment, the PFA intends to incur debt only when it is
financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at this time that the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD will
provide funding for approximately $100 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement
costs from a combination of tax increment bond or loan proceeds (multiple issuances may be
necessary) and pay-as-you-go tax increment funding over the District lifetime
Page 414
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 15
5.4 Limit on Total Dollars Allocated to the District
The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District shall not exceed
$500,000,000 in nominal dollars over the District lifetime.
The City hereby irrevocably allocates all of the City’s share of tax increment as characterized
herein to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD to the extent that: (i) the City’s share of increment is
necessary to repay bonds, notes or related agreements or to meet contractual obligations that
the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is obligated to satisfy with Rancho Cucamonga EIFD tax
increment, and (ii) prior to the PFA incurring an obligation under subsection (i), such bonds, notes,
agreements or obligations shall be approved by the City Council.
5.5 District Termination Date
The District will cease to exist the earlier of: (i) forty five (45) years from the date on which the
issuance of bonds is approved by the PFA, or (ii) June 30, 2072. This IFP assumes that the District
will be formed in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and will begin receiving tax revenues in Fiscal Year 2022-
2023.
5.6 Analysis of Costs to Provide Facilities and Services
Appendix D to this IFP includes, as part of the Fiscal Impact Analysis, an analysis of the costs to
the City for providing facilities and services to the area of the District while the area is being
developed and after the area is developed. It is estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime
(assumed stabilized buildout of District area), annual costs to the City will be approximately $20.2
million to service the area of the District. Additionally, annual costs to the Fire District at Year 20
are estimated at $4.6 million.
5.7 Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix D to this IFP includes an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the
associated development upon the City and the Fire District, as the only affected taxing entities
that are allocating tax increment revenues to the District. Table 4 presents an overview of fiscal
impacts to the City and Fire District. It is estimated that, at Year 20 of the District lifetime, the
District area will generate an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $5.3 million to the City
and an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $1.2 million to the Fire District. Over 50 years,
it is estimated that District activity will generate a positive net fiscal impact of approximately $146
million for the City and approximately $57 million for the Fire District on a present-value basis.
This is in addition to the Community economic benefits outlined in Section 4 of this IFP (e.g.,
housing, jobs, mobility and connectivity, quality of life, environmental sustainability).
Page 415
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 16
Table 3: Projection of District Revenues by Year
Incremental
Assessed Value
Property Tax
Increment @
1% General
Levy
Average City
Share
Available
City
Increment
Available
Portion of
City Share
Allocated
City
Increment
Allocated
Average Fire
District Share
Available
Fire District
Increment
Available
Portion of
Fire Share
Allocated
Fire
Increment
Allocated
Total Taxes
Allocated to
EIFD
0 2021 / 2022 $0 $0 5.20% $0 100% $0 12.4% $0 80%$0 $0
1 2022 / 2023 $79,994,178 $799,942 5.20% $41,565 100% $41,565 12.4% $98,820 80% $79,056 $120,622
2 2023 / 2024 $1,460,958,382 $14,609,584 5.20% $759,118 100% $759,118 12.4% $1,804,788 80% $1,443,830 $2,202,948
3 2024 / 2025 $2,629,495,495 $26,294,955 5.20% $1,366,293 100% $1,366,293 12.4% $3,248,334 80% $2,598,667 $3,964,961
4 2025 /2026 $3,843,897,932 $38,438,979 5.20% $1,997,300 100% $1,997,300 12.4% $4,748,540 80% $3,798,832 $5,796,133
5 2026 / 2027 $5,123,419,002 $51,234,190 5.20% $2,662,143 100% $2,662,143 12.4% $6,329,190 80% $5,063,352 $7,725,495
6 2027 / 2028 $5,471,300,778 $54,713,008 5.20% $2,842,904 90% $2,558,613 12.4% $6,758,944 70% $4,731,261 $7,289,874
7 2028 / 2029 $5,830,756,681 $58,307,567 5.20% $3,029,678 90% $2,726,710 12.4% $7,202,996 70% $5,042,097 $7,768,808
8 2029 / 2030 $6,202,110,524 $62,021,105 5.20% $3,222,634 90% $2,900,371 12.4% $7,661,746 70% $5,363,222 $8,263,593
9 2030 / 2031 $6,585,694,440 $65,856,944 5.20% $3,421,946 90% $3,079,751 12.4% $8,135,605 70% $5,694,923 $8,774,675
10 2031 / 2032 $6,981,849,092 $69,818,491 5.20% $3,627,789 90% $3,265,010 12.4% $8,624,993 70% $6,037,495 $9,302,505
11 2032 / 2033 $7,136,074,915 $71,360,749 5.20% $3,707,925 80% $2,966,340 12.4% $8,815,515 60% $5,289,309 $8,255,649
12 2033 / 2034 $7,293,385,254 $72,933,853 5.20% $3,789,664 80% $3,031,731 12.4% $9,009,847 60% $5,405,908 $8,437,639
13 2034 / 2035 $7,453,841,799 $74,538,418 5.20% $3,873,038 80% $3,098,430 12.4% $9,208,066 60% $5,524,840 $8,623,270
14 2035 / 2036 $7,617,507,476 $76,175,075 5.20% $3,958,079 80% $3,166,463 12.4% $9,410,250 60% $5,646,150 $8,812,613
15 2036 / 2037 $7,784,446,466 $77,844,465 5.20% $4,044,821 80% $3,235,857 12.4% $9,616,477 60% $5,769,886 $9,005,743
16 2037 / 2038 $7,954,724,236 $79,547,242 5.20% $4,133,298 70% $2,893,308 12.4% $9,826,829 50% $4,913,414 $7,806,723
17 2038 / 2039 $8,128,407,561 $81,284,076 5.20% $4,223,544 70% $2,956,481 12.4% $10,041,388 50% $5,020,694 $7,977,175
18 2039 / 2040 $8,305,564,553 $83,055,646 5.20% $4,315,595 70% $3,020,917 12.4% $10,260,238 50% $5,130,119 $8,151,036
19 2040 / 2041 $8,486,264,685 $84,862,647 5.20% $4,409,488 70% $3,086,641 12.4% $10,483,465 50% $5,241,732 $8,328,374
20 2041 / 2042 $8,670,578,819 $86,705,788 5.20% $4,505,258 70% $3,153,680 12.4% $10,711,156 50% $5,355,578 $8,509,259
21 2042 / 2043 $8,858,579,236 $88,585,792 5.20% $4,602,943 60% $2,761,766 12.4% $10,943,402 40% $4,377,361 $7,139,127
22 2043 / 2044 $9,050,339,661 $90,503,397 5.20% $4,702,583 60% $2,821,550 12.4% $11,180,292 40% $4,472,117 $7,293,666
23 2044 / 2045 $9,245,935,295 $92,459,353 5.20% $4,804,215 60% $2,882,529 12.4% $11,421,920 40% $4,568,768 $7,451,297
24 2045 / 2046 $9,445,442,842 $94,454,428 5.20% $4,907,879 60% $2,944,728 12.4% $11,668,381 40% $4,667,352 $7,612,080
25 2046 / 2047 $9,648,940,539 $96,489,405 5.20% $5,013,617 60% $3,008,170 12.4% $11,919,771 40% $4,767,908 $7,776,079
26 2047 / 2048 $9,856,508,190 $98,565,082 5.20% $5,121,470 50% $2,560,735 12.4% $12,176,188 30% $3,652,856 $6,213,592
27 2048 / 2049 $10,068,227,195 $100,682,272 5.20% $5,231,480 50% $2,615,740 12.4% $12,437,734 30% $3,731,320 $6,347,060
28 2049 / 2050 $10,284,180,579 $102,841,806 5.20% $5,343,690 50% $2,671,845 12.4% $12,704,511 30% $3,811,353 $6,483,198
29 2050 / 2051 $10,504,453,032 $105,044,530 5.20% $5,458,144 50% $2,729,072 12.4% $12,976,624 30% $3,892,987 $6,622,059
30 2051 /2052 $10,729,130,933 $107,291,309 5.20% $5,574,887 50% $2,787,444 12.4% $13,254,178 30% $3,976,254 $6,763,697
31 2052 / 2053 $10,958,302,392 $109,583,024 5.20% $5,693,965 40% $2,277,586 12.4% $13,537,284 20% $2,707,457 $4,985,043
32 2053 / 2054 $11,192,057,280 $111,920,573 5.20% $5,815,425 40% $2,326,170 12.4% $13,826,052 20% $2,765,210 $5,091,381
33 2054 / 2055 $11,430,487,267 $114,304,873 5.20% $5,939,314 40% $2,375,726 12.4% $14,120,596 20% $2,824,119 $5,199,845
34 2055 / 2056 $11,673,685,853 $116,736,859 5.20% $6,065,681 9% $545,911 12.4% $14,421,030 5% $721,051 $1,266,963
35 2056 / 2057 $11,921,748,410 $119,217,484 5.20% $6,194,575 9% $557,512 12.4% $14,727,473 5% $736,374 $1,293,885
36 2057 / 2058 $12,174,772,219 $121,747,722 5.20% $6,326,047 9% $569,344 12.4% $15,040,044 5% $752,002 $1,321,346
37 2058 / 2059 $12,432,856,504 $124,328,565 5.20% $6,460,148 9% $581,413 12.4% $15,358,867 5% $767,943 $1,349,357
38 2059 / 2060 $12,696,102,475 $126,961,025 5.20% $6,596,931 9% $593,724 12.4% $15,684,067 5% $784,203 $1,377,927
39 2060 / 2061 $12,964,613,365 $129,646,134 5.20% $6,736,450 9% $606,281 12.4% $16,015,771 5% $800,789 $1,407,069
40 2061 / 2062 $13,238,494,473 $132,384,945 5.20% $6,878,760 9% $619,088 12.4% $16,354,108 5% $817,705 $1,436,794
41 2062 / 2063 $13,517,853,203 $135,178,532 5.20% $7,023,915 9% $632,152 12.4% $16,699,213 5% $834,961 $1,467,113
42 2063 / 2064 $13,802,799,107 $138,027,991 5.20% $7,171,974 9% $645,478 12.4% $17,051,219 5% $852,561 $1,498,039
43 2064 / 2065 $14,093,443,930 $140,934,439 5.20% $7,322,994 9% $659,069 12.4% $17,410,266 5% $870,513 $1,529,583
44 2065 / 2066 $14,389,901,649 $143,899,016 5.20% $7,477,034 9% $672,933 12.4% $17,776,493 5% $888,825 $1,561,758
45 2066 / 2067 $14,692,288,523 $146,922,885 5.20% $7,634,155 9% $687,074 12.4% $18,150,045 5% $907,502 $1,594,576
46 2067 / 2068 $15,000,723,134 $150,007,231 5.20% $7,794,419 9% $701,498 12.4% $18,531,069 5% $926,553 $1,628,051
47 2068 / 2069 $15,315,326,437 $153,153,264 5.20% $7,957,888 9% $716,210 12.4% $18,919,712 5% $945,986 $1,662,196
48 2069 / 2070 $15,636,221,807 $156,362,218 5.20% $8,124,626 9% $731,216 12.4% $19,316,129 5% $965,806 $1,697,023
49 2070 / 2071 $15,963,535,083 $159,635,351 5.20% $8,294,699 9% $746,523 12.4% $19,720,474 5% $986,024 $1,732,547
50 2071 / 2072 $16,297,394,626 $162,973,946 5.20% $8,468,173 9% $762,136 12.4% $20,132,905 5% $1,006,645 $1,768,781
$4,901,246,175 $254,670,163 38% $97,757,347 $605,473,006 26% $157,930,876 $255,688,223
$2,127,176,505 $110,528,704 51% $55,963,836 $262,779,691 36% $93,907,319 $149,871,155
City Contribution Fire District Contribution
Fiscal Year
Total
Present Value @ 3%
Page 416
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 17
Table 4: Overview of Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire District
5.8 Developer Reimbursement for Transit Priority Project
The PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a
developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies
for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470. To the extent that a developer
is willing to fund Transit Priority Project infrastructure expenditures beyond and in advance of said
developer’s fair share (not contemplated at this time), the PFA may consider and evaluate such
reimbursement at the appropriate time.
Annual
(Stablized
Year 20)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$25,486,770 $1,622,088,000 $651,158,500
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $20,218,100 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $5,268,670 $364,427,900 $145,928,900
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$5,795,350 $463,975,600 $172,055,900
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $4,613,300 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to Fire District $1,182,050 $176,995,700 $56,761,100
Page 417
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 18
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and
Replacement Housing Plan
The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units will be removed as a result of any public works
construction within the area of the District or private development within the area of the District
that is subject to a written agreement with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the
District. However, if any relocation of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a
project financed by the District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code
Section 53398.56.
Page 418
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 19
7.0 Goals of the District
As stated in the Resolution of Intention, the goal of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD is to assist in
the provision of public facilities of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits
and promote economic development within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD or
the surrounding community and, for those facilities located outside the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
boundaries which also have a tangible connection to the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD.
More specifically, the goals of the District’s implementation of the public facilities outlined in
Section 3.2 are to support the City’s General Plan, facilitate implementation of regional
connectivity through various modes of transportation, and to provide the infrastructure foundation
for the development of critically-needed housing in the community and greater region. The District
additionally aims to implement Statewide policy goals of housing supply and sustainable
infrastructure investment.
Additional objectives include economic development in the form of fiscal revenue generation for
the City and other taxing entities, job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life,
and promotion of environmental sustainability. The District will be utilized to address critical
infrastructure funding needs, which are are critical to catalyze private sector investment and
development.
Page 419
Rancho Cucamonga EIFD
Proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan
April 2022
Page 20
8.0 Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD (draft / placeholder)
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix E: City General Plan Envionmental Impact Report
Page 420
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Total 2021-2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units 202 units 236 units 2,583 units 2,583 units 2,583 units 413 units 413 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904 $65,405,338 $77,942,440 $870,022,578 $887,423,029 $905,171,490 $147,785,952 $150,741,671
For Sale Residential 1,514 units 832 units 67 units 67 units 67 units 96 units 96 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094 $535,012,766 $44,164,275 $45,047,560 $45,948,512 $66,820,964 $68,157,384
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF 22,000 SF 284,667 SF 284,667 SF 284,667 SF 9,200 SF 9,200 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823 $6,271,531 $82,772,809 $84,428,265 $86,116,831 $2,838,830 $2,895,607
Office 222,000 SF 22,000 SF 40,000 SF 40,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954 $4,829,537 $9,504,811 $9,694,907
Hotel 171 units 71 units 100 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790 $11,966,681 $17,886,109
Industrial 6,272,408 SF 4,072,408 SF 700,000 SF 700,000 SF 700,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574 $728,752,525 $127,769,443 $130,324,832 $132,931,329 $3,873,999 $3,951,479
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138 $65,405,338 $1,364,775,479 $1,124,729,105 $1,147,223,687 $1,188,054,270 $230,824,556 $235,441,047
Total Assessed Value $729,442,030 $809,436,208 $2,190,400,412 $3,358,937,525 $4,573,339,962 $5,852,861,032 $6,200,742,808 $6,560,198,711
Incremental AV $79,994,178 $1,460,958,382 $2,629,495,495 $3,843,897,932 $5,123,419,002 $5,471,300,778 $5,830,756,681
Total tax increment @ 1%$799,942 $14,609,584 $26,294,955 $38,438,979 $51,234,190 $54,713,008 $58,307,567
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163 $41,565 $759,118 $1,366,293 $1,997,300 $2,662,143 $2,842,904 $3,029,678
Percent Allocated to EIFD 100%100%100%100%100%90%90%
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347 $41,565 $759,118 $1,366,293 $1,997,300 $2,662,143 $2,558,613 $2,726,710
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006 $98,820 $1,804,788 $3,248,334 $4,748,540 $6,329,190 $6,758,944 $7,202,996
Percent Allocated to EIFD 80%80%80%80%80%70%70%
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876 $79,056 $1,443,830 $2,598,667 $3,798,832 $5,063,352 $4,731,261 $5,042,097
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223 $120,622 $2,202,948 $3,964,961 $5,796,133 $7,725,495 $7,289,874 $7,768,808
3/21/2022 Page 1 of 7
Page 421
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
413 units 413 units 413 units
$153,756,504 $156,831,634 $159,968,267
96 units 96 units 96 units
$69,520,531 $70,910,942 $72,329,161
9,200 SF 9,200 SF 9,200 SF
$2,953,519 $3,012,589 $3,072,841
40,000 SF 40,000 SF 40,000 SF
$9,888,805 $10,086,581 $10,288,313
20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF
$4,030,508 $4,111,118 $4,193,341
$240,149,868 $244,952,865 $249,851,923 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,931,552,554 $7,315,136,470 $7,711,291,122 $7,865,516,945 $8,022,827,284 $8,183,283,829 $8,346,949,506 $8,513,888,496
$6,202,110,524 $6,585,694,440 $6,981,849,092 $7,136,074,915 $7,293,385,254 $7,453,841,799 $7,617,507,476 $7,784,446,466
$62,021,105 $65,856,944 $69,818,491 $71,360,749 $72,933,853 $74,538,418 $76,175,075 $77,844,465
$3,222,634 $3,421,946 $3,627,789 $3,707,925 $3,789,664 $3,873,038 $3,958,079 $4,044,821
90%90%90%80%80%80%80%80%
$2,900,371 $3,079,751 $3,265,010 $2,966,340 $3,031,731 $3,098,430 $3,166,463 $3,235,857
$7,661,746 $8,135,605 $8,624,993 $8,815,515 $9,009,847 $9,208,066 $9,410,250 $9,616,477
70%70%70%60%60%60%60%60%
$5,363,222 $5,694,923 $6,037,495 $5,289,309 $5,405,908 $5,524,840 $5,646,150 $5,769,886
$8,263,593 $8,774,675 $9,302,505 $8,255,649 $8,437,639 $8,623,270 $8,812,613 $9,005,743
3/21/2022 Page 2 of 7
Page 422
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$8,684,166,266 $8,857,849,591 $9,035,006,583 $9,215,706,715 $9,400,020,849 $9,588,021,266 $9,779,781,691 $9,975,377,325
$7,954,724,236 $8,128,407,561 $8,305,564,553 $8,486,264,685 $8,670,578,819 $8,858,579,236 $9,050,339,661 $9,245,935,295
$79,547,242 $81,284,076 $83,055,646 $84,862,647 $86,705,788 $88,585,792 $90,503,397 $92,459,353
$4,133,298 $4,223,544 $4,315,595 $4,409,488 $4,505,258 $4,602,943 $4,702,583 $4,804,215
70%70%70%70%70%60%60%60%
$2,893,308 $2,956,481 $3,020,917 $3,086,641 $3,153,680 $2,761,766 $2,821,550 $2,882,529
$9,826,829 $10,041,388 $10,260,238 $10,483,465 $10,711,156 $10,943,402 $11,180,292 $11,421,920
50%50%50%50%50%40%40%40%
$4,913,414 $5,020,694 $5,130,119 $5,241,732 $5,355,578 $4,377,361 $4,472,117 $4,568,768
$7,806,723 $7,977,175 $8,151,036 $8,328,374 $8,509,259 $7,139,127 $7,293,666 $7,451,297
3/21/2022 Page 3 of 7
Page 423
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,174,884,872 $10,378,382,569 $10,585,950,220 $10,797,669,225 $11,013,622,609 $11,233,895,062 $11,458,572,963 $11,687,744,422
$9,445,442,842 $9,648,940,539 $9,856,508,190 $10,068,227,195 $10,284,180,579 $10,504,453,032 $10,729,130,933 $10,958,302,392
$94,454,428 $96,489,405 $98,565,082 $100,682,272 $102,841,806 $105,044,530 $107,291,309 $109,583,024
$4,907,879 $5,013,617 $5,121,470 $5,231,480 $5,343,690 $5,458,144 $5,574,887 $5,693,965
60%60%50%50%50%50%50%40%
$2,944,728 $3,008,170 $2,560,735 $2,615,740 $2,671,845 $2,729,072 $2,787,444 $2,277,586
$11,668,381 $11,919,771 $12,176,188 $12,437,734 $12,704,511 $12,976,624 $13,254,178 $13,537,284
40%40%30%30%30%30%30%20%
$4,667,352 $4,767,908 $3,652,856 $3,731,320 $3,811,353 $3,892,987 $3,976,254 $2,707,457
$7,612,080 $7,776,079 $6,213,592 $6,347,060 $6,483,198 $6,622,059 $6,763,697 $4,985,043
3/21/2022 Page 4 of 7
Page 424
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$11,921,499,310 $12,159,929,297 $12,403,127,883 $12,651,190,440 $12,904,214,249 $13,162,298,534 $13,425,544,505 $13,694,055,395
$11,192,057,280 $11,430,487,267 $11,673,685,853 $11,921,748,410 $12,174,772,219 $12,432,856,504 $12,696,102,475 $12,964,613,365
$111,920,573 $114,304,873 $116,736,859 $119,217,484 $121,747,722 $124,328,565 $126,961,025 $129,646,134
$5,815,425 $5,939,314 $6,065,681 $6,194,575 $6,326,047 $6,460,148 $6,596,931 $6,736,450
40%40%9%9%9%9%9%9%
$2,326,170 $2,375,726 $545,911 $557,512 $569,344 $581,413 $593,724 $606,281
$13,826,052 $14,120,596 $14,421,030 $14,727,473 $15,040,044 $15,358,867 $15,684,067 $16,015,771
20%20%5%5%5%5%5%5%
$2,765,210 $2,824,119 $721,051 $736,374 $752,002 $767,943 $784,203 $800,789
$5,091,381 $5,199,845 $1,266,963 $1,293,885 $1,321,346 $1,349,357 $1,377,927 $1,407,069
3/21/2022 Page 5 of 7
Page 425
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$13,967,936,503 $14,247,295,233 $14,532,241,137 $14,822,885,960 $15,119,343,679 $15,421,730,553 $15,730,165,164 $16,044,768,467
$13,238,494,473 $13,517,853,203 $13,802,799,107 $14,093,443,930 $14,389,901,649 $14,692,288,523 $15,000,723,134 $15,315,326,437
$132,384,945 $135,178,532 $138,027,991 $140,934,439 $143,899,016 $146,922,885 $150,007,231 $153,153,264
$6,878,760 $7,023,915 $7,171,974 $7,322,994 $7,477,034 $7,634,155 $7,794,419 $7,957,888
9%9%9%9%9%9%9%9%
$619,088 $632,152 $645,478 $659,069 $672,933 $687,074 $701,498 $716,210
$16,354,108 $16,699,213 $17,051,219 $17,410,266 $17,776,493 $18,150,045 $18,531,069 $18,919,712
5%5%5%5%5%5%5%5%
$817,705 $834,961 $852,561 $870,513 $888,825 $907,502 $926,553 $945,986
$1,436,794 $1,467,113 $1,498,039 $1,529,583 $1,561,758 $1,594,576 $1,628,051 $1,662,196
3/21/2022 Page 6 of 7
Page 426
APPENDIX C: Rancho Cucamonta EIFD - Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis DRAFT
Total
New Development
Rental Residential 10,253 units
$317,440 per unit $3,575,048,904
For Sale Residential 1,514 units
$618,074 per unit $1,017,912,094
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
$274 PSF $274,362,823
Office 222,000 SF
$211 PSF $54,292,954
Hotel 171 units
$162,000 per unit $29,852,790
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
$172 PSF $1,139,938,574
Subtotal Value Add $6,091,408,138
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 5.20%$254,670,163
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $97,757,347
Fire District Share Equivalent Available 12.35%$605,473,006
Percent Allocated to EIFD
Amount Allocated to EIFD $157,930,876
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $255,688,223
48 49 50
2070 2071 2072
$0 $0 $0
$16,365,663,837 $16,692,977,113 $17,026,836,656
$15,636,221,807 $15,963,535,083 $16,297,394,626
$156,362,218 $159,635,351 $162,973,946
$8,124,626 $8,294,699 $8,468,173
9%9%9%
$731,216 $746,523 $762,136
$19,316,129 $19,720,474 $20,132,905
5%5%5%
$965,806 $986,024 $1,006,645
$1,697,023 $1,732,547 $1,768,781
3/21/2022 Page 7 of 7
Page 427
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Overview of Fiscal Impacts Key Land Use Assumptions (Stabilized Year 25)
Annual
(Stablized
Year 20)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga For-Sale Residential 1,514 DU
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$25,486,770 $1,620,569,600 $650,817,300 Rental Residential 10,253 DU
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $20,218,100 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600 Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $5,268,670 $362,909,500 $145,587,700 Office 222,000 SF
Industrial 6,272,408 SF
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Hotel 171 rooms
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of Allocation of TI to EIFD)$5,795,350 $462,129,400 $171,640,900
Estimated Fiscal Expenditures $4,613,300 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to Fire District $1,182,050 $175,149,500 $56,346,100
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Project Component
3/21/2022 Page 1 of 16
Page 428
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of Estimated Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire Fund Stablized
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2062 2072
Stabilized
Escalation
Rate
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value @
3.0%
City of Rancho Cucamonga Revenues
Property Tax $2,865,700 $3,858,000 $4,259,500 $4,702,900 $5,192,400 $5,732,800 $6,988,200 $8,518,600 2.0%$262,298,600 $111,401,900
Property Tax Allocation to EIFD ($2,865,700)($3,472,200)($3,407,600)($3,292,030)($3,115,440)($2,866,400)($628,938)($766,674)2.0%($102,186,800)($57,115,000)
Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100 $6,707,400 $7,405,512 $9,027,277 $11,004,201 2.0%$338,719,400 $143,809,700
Property Transfer Tax $177,600 $250,300 $276,400 $305,200 $336,900 $371,965 $453,423 $552,720 2.0%$17,015,400 $7,227,400
Sales and Use Tax - Direct / On-Site $4,210,900 $5,091,700 $5,902,700 $6,842,900 $7,932,700 $9,196,173 $12,358,888 $16,609,312 3.0%$428,828,800 $173,618,900
Sales and Use Tax - Indirect / Off-Site $2,113,600 $3,082,000 $3,572,800 $4,141,900 $4,801,600 $5,566,370 $7,480,736 $10,053,484 3.0%$257,590,400 $103,455,900
Transient Occupancy Tax $792,300 $918,500 $1,064,800 $1,234,400 $1,431,000 $1,658,921 $2,229,451 $2,996,196 3.0%$77,389,300 $31,349,600
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $145,500 $188,000 $218,000 $252,700 $293,000 $339,667 $456,484 $613,477 3.0%$15,792,700 $6,374,600
Franchise Fees $940,200 $1,366,300 $1,584,000 $1,836,300 $2,128,700 $2,467,747 $3,316,445 $4,457,025 3.0%$114,228,600 $45,891,600
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$260,400 $338,000 $391,800 $454,200 $526,500 $610,358 $820,270 $1,102,374 3.0%$28,494,100 $11,558,100
Animal Licenses $35,200 $52,100 $60,400 $70,000 $81,200 $94,133 $126,507 $170,015 3.0%$4,351,500 $1,745,700
Fines and Forfeitures $124,700 $181,300 $210,200 $243,600 $282,400 $327,379 $439,970 $591,283 3.0%$15,154,400 $6,088,400
Use of Money and Property $192,900 $280,400 $325,000 $376,800 $436,800 $506,371 $680,520 $914,562 3.0%$23,439,600 $9,417,000
Charges for Services $453,000 $670,200 $776,900 $900,600 $1,044,100 $1,210,398 $1,626,674 $2,186,114 3.0%$55,956,600 $22,448,300
Intergovernmental $26,600 $38,700 $44,900 $52,000 $60,300 $69,904 $93,945 $126,255 3.0%$3,235,900 $1,300,100
Other Revenue $446,700 $649,200 $752,600 $872,400 $1,011,400 $1,172,490 $1,575,728 $2,117,647 3.0%$54,272,800 $21,804,200
Transfers In $213,900 $310,900 $360,400 $417,800 $484,300 $561,436 $754,524 $1,014,017 3.0%$25,988,300 $10,440,900
Estimated Total Revenues $13,820,800 $18,787,100 $21,895,200 $25,486,770 $29,635,260 $34,425,225 $47,800,106 $62,260,607 $1,620,569,600 $650,817,300
City of Rancho Cucamonga Expenditures
Police $5,829,900 $8,472,700 $9,822,200 $11,386,600 $13,200,200 $15,302,650 $20,565,481 $27,638,287 3.0%$708,336,100 $284,575,200
Non-departmental $546,000 $793,400 $919,800 $1,066,300 $1,236,200 $1,433,095 $1,925,959 $2,588,328 3.0%$66,335,200 $26,650,100
City Council $12,800 $18,600 $21,600 $25,000 $29,000 $33,619 $45,181 $60,720 3.0%$1,556,200 $625,200
City Management $100,500 $146,000 $169,300 $196,200 $227,500 $263,735 $354,438 $476,334 3.0%$12,207,800 $4,904,500
City Clerk $200 $300 $300 $400 $400 $464 $623 $838 3.0%$21,600 $8,700
Animal Care and Services $312,100 $461,700 $535,200 $620,500 $719,300 $833,866 $1,120,646 $1,506,054 3.0%$38,549,700 $15,465,100
Records Management $48,400 $70,300 $81,600 $94,500 $109,600 $127,056 $170,753 $229,478 3.0%$5,881,200 $2,362,800
Healthy RC Program $60,700 $89,800 $104,100 $120,700 $139,900 $162,182 $217,960 $292,920 3.0%$7,497,500 $3,007,700
Community Affairs $51,100 $74,200 $86,100 $99,800 $115,700 $134,128 $180,257 $242,250 3.0%$6,208,300 $2,494,100
Admin. Services - Admin $17,800 $25,800 $29,900 $34,700 $40,200 $46,603 $62,630 $84,170 3.0%$2,157,300 $866,800
Business Licensing $27,400 $35,500 $41,200 $47,800 $55,400 $64,224 $86,311 $115,995 3.0%$2,997,700 $1,215,900
City Facilities $94,000 $136,600 $158,300 $183,500 $212,800 $246,694 $331,535 $445,556 3.0%$11,418,700 $4,587,400
Finance $148,900 $216,400 $250,800 $290,800 $337,100 $390,791 $525,191 $705,813 3.0%$18,089,000 $7,267,300
Innovation and Tech Services $364,800 $530,100 $614,600 $712,500 $825,900 $957,444 $1,286,725 $1,729,251 3.0%$44,319,300 $17,805,500
Human Resources $55,600 $80,700 $93,600 $108,500 $125,800 $145,837 $195,992 $263,397 3.0%$6,750,200 $2,711,800
Procurement $24,800 $36,100 $41,800 $48,500 $56,200 $65,151 $87,558 $117,670 3.0%$3,016,200 $1,211,800
Risk Management $27,800 $40,400 $46,800 $54,300 $63,000 $73,034 $98,152 $131,908 3.0%$3,379,800 $1,357,700
Treasury Management $600 $800 $1,000 $1,100 $1,300 $1,507 $2,025 $2,722 3.0%$69,800 $28,000
City Telecommunications $22,500 $32,700 $37,900 $43,900 $50,900 $59,007 $79,301 $106,573 3.0%$2,731,400 $1,097,400
Economic and Comm. Development $82,500 $120,000 $139,100 $161,200 $186,900 $216,668 $291,184 $391,327 3.0%$10,029,300 $4,029,300
Building and Safety $178,000 $258,600 $299,800 $347,600 $403,000 $467,187 $627,861 $843,793 3.0%$21,624,700 $8,687,600
Engineering $239,300 $347,700 $403,100 $467,300 $541,800 $628,095 $844,107 $1,134,409 3.0%$29,072,800 $11,679,900
Fire Facilities Maintenance $34,700 $50,400 $58,400 $67,700 $78,500 $91,003 $122,300 $164,362 3.0%$4,212,200 $1,692,200
City Facilities Maintenance $348,900 $507,100 $587,800 $681,400 $790,000 $915,827 $1,230,794 $1,654,085 3.0%$42,391,900 $17,031,000
Planning $184,000 $267,500 $310,100 $359,500 $416,700 $483,070 $649,205 $872,477 3.0%$22,361,000 $8,983,600
Planning Commission $1,900 $2,800 $3,200 $3,700 $4,300 $4,985 $6,699 $9,003 3.0%$230,700 $92,600
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $110,100 $159,900 $185,400 $215,000 $249,200 $288,891 $388,245 $521,769 3.0%$13,372,100 $5,372,200
Street Maintenance $238,700 $346,900 $402,200 $466,200 $540,500 $626,588 $842,081 $1,131,687 3.0%$29,003,100 $11,651,900
Park Maintenance $295,200 $436,700 $506,300 $586,900 $680,400 $788,770 $1,060,041 $1,424,607 3.0%$36,464,900 $14,628,700
Community Improvement $79,100 $115,000 $133,300 $154,500 $179,200 $207,742 $279,188 $375,205 3.0%$9,615,300 $3,862,800
Community Services $804,600 $1,169,300 $1,355,600 $1,571,500 $1,821,800 $2,111,966 $2,838,305 $3,814,445 3.0%$97,759,100 $39,274,800
Estimated Total Expenditures $10,342,900 $15,044,000 $17,440,400 $20,218,100 $23,438,700 $27,171,877 $36,516,731 $49,075,433 $1,257,660,100 $505,229,600
Estimated Annual Net Fiscal Impact $3,477,900 $3,743,100 $4,454,800 $5,268,670 $6,196,560 $7,253,348 $11,283,375 $13,185,174 $362,909,500 $145,587,700
Revenue / Expenditure Ratio 1.34 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.31 1.27 1.29 1.29
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Select years shown for illustration
3/21/2022 Page 2 of 16
Page 429
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of Estimated Fiscal Impacts to City and Fire Fund Stablized
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2062 2072
Stabilized
Escalation
Rate
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value @
3.0%
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Revenues
Property Tax $6,272,400 $8,444,300 $9,323,200 $10,293,500 $11,364,900 $12,547,700 $15,295,600 $18,645,300 2.0%$574,110,900 $243,832,800
Property Tax Allocation to EIFD ($5,017,920)($5,911,010)($5,593,920)($5,146,750)($4,545,960)($3,764,310)($764,780)($932,265)2.0%($152,329,600)($88,401,900)
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $332,100 $482,600 $559,500 $648,600 $751,900 $871,658 $1,171,436 $1,574,312 3.0%$40,348,100 $16,210,000
Estimated Total Revenues $1,586,580 $3,015,890 $4,288,780 $5,795,350 $7,570,840 $9,655,048 $15,702,256 $19,287,347 $462,129,400 $171,640,900
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Expenditures
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300 $5,348,000 $6,199,798 $8,332,010 $11,197,524 3.0%$286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Total Expenditures $2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300 $5,348,000 $6,199,798 $8,332,010 $11,197,524 $286,979,900 $115,294,800
Estimated Annual Net Fiscal Impact ($775,420)($416,810)$309,380 $1,182,050 $2,222,840 $3,455,250 $7,370,246 $8,089,822 $175,149,500 $56,346,100
Revenue / Expenditure Ratio 0.67 0.88 1.08 1.26 1.42 1.56 1.88 1.72 1.61 1.49
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure
Values in 2022 dollars
Select years shown for illustration
3/21/2022 Page 3 of 16
Page 430
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Project Description
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
For-Sale Residential 1,034 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU
Rental Residential 8,186 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU
Total Residential 9,220 DU 11,767 DU 11,767 DU 11,767 DU
Hotel 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms
Commercial / Retail 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Office 22,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF
Industrial 6,172,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF
Annual Escalation Factor 2.0%1.10 1.22 1.35 1.49
Estimated A/V - SF Residential $618K Per Unit $705,605,362 $1,140,691,138 $1,259,415,188 $1,390,496,133
Estimated A/V - MF Residential $317K Per Unit $2,869,024,452 $3,967,476,157 $4,380,414,262 $4,836,331,297
Estimated A/V - Hotel $162K Per Room $30,585,246 $33,768,583 $37,283,245 $41,163,715
Estimated A/V - Retail $274 PSF $265,005,891 $307,952,122 $340,004,027 $375,391,919
Estimated A/V - Office $211 PSF $5,125,143 $57,100,137 $63,043,165 $69,604,748
Estimated A/V - Industrial $172 PSF $1,172,151,995 $1,315,117,221 $1,451,995,677 $1,603,120,553
Total Estimated Assessed Value $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364
Notes:
Adjusted for value appreciation assuming 2% annual escalation rate (statuatory maximum).
Conservatively assuming no mark-to-market valuations above 2% growth to account for property transfers
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
3/21/2022 Page 4 of 16
Page 431
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Project Employment and Occupants
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
Industrial 6,172,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF 6,272,408 SF
Commercial / Retail 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Office 22,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF 222,000 SF
Hotel 171 Rooms 171 Rooms 171 Rooms 171 Rooms
For-sale Residential 1,034 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU 1,514 DU
Rental Residential 8,186 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU 10,253 DU
Estimated # Employees (FTE)
Industrial 1,500 SF / emp 4,115 4,182 4,182 4,182
Commercial / Retail 400 SF / emp 2,190 2,305 2,305 2,305
Office 350 SF / emp 63 634 634 634
Hotel 1.5 room / emp 114 114 114 114
For-sale Residential 0 DU / emp 0 0 0 0
Rental Residential 50 DU / emp 164 205 205 205
Total Estimated # Employees (FTE)6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Occupied Dwelling Units 95%8,759 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU
Residents 2.25 per DU 19,708 25,152 25,152 25,152
Employees Weighted at 50%50%3,323 3,720 3,720 3,720
Total Service Population (Residents + Empl.)23,031 28,872 28,872 28,872
Occupied Hotel Rooms 75%128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms
Hotel Guests 1.5 per room 192 192 192 192
Notes:
Average household size reflects City average household size and product mix of multifamily units
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
3/21/2022 Page 5 of 16
Page 432
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50
2027 2032 2037 2042 2052 2062 2072
Estimated Assessed Value - Residential $3,574,629,814 $5,108,167,295 $5,639,829,450 $6,226,827,429 $7,590,467,890 $9,252,738,003 $11,279,035,996
Estimated Assessed Value - Non-Residential $1,472,868,276 $1,713,938,063 $1,892,326,113 $2,089,280,935 $2,546,821,801 $3,104,561,565 $3,784,443,224
Total Estimated Assessed Value $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364 $10,137,289,692 $12,357,299,568 $15,063,479,220
Total Secured Property Tax General Levy 1.00%$50,474,981 $68,221,054 $75,321,556 $83,161,084 $101,372,897 $123,572,996 $150,634,792
Estimated Unsecured Property Tax as % of Secured Non-Residential Value 10.00%$1,472,868 $1,713,938 $1,892,326 $2,089,281 $2,546,822 $3,104,562 $3,784,443
Total Estimated Secured + Unsecured Property Tax $51,947,849 $69,934,992 $77,213,882 $85,250,365 $103,919,719 $126,677,557 $154,419,235
Distributions to Taxing Entities
City of Rancho Cucamonga 5.52%$2,865,700 $3,858,000 $4,259,500 $4,702,900 $5,732,800 $6,988,200 $8,518,600
City Allocation to EIFD - Percent 100%90%80%70%50%9%9%
City Allocation to EIFD - Dollar Amount ($2,865,700)($3,472,200)($3,407,600)($3,292,030)($2,866,400)($628,938)($766,674)
Net Property Tax to City $0 $385,800 $851,900 $1,410,870 $2,866,400 $6,359,262 $7,751,926
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District 12.07%$6,272,400 $8,444,300 $9,323,200 $10,293,500 $12,547,700 $15,295,600 $18,645,300
Fire District Allocation to EIFD - Percent 80%70%60%50%30%5%5%
Fire District Allocation to EIFD - Dollar Amount ($5,017,920)($5,911,010)($5,593,920)($5,146,750)($3,764,310)($764,780)($932,265)
Net Property Tax to Fire District $1,254,480 $2,533,290 $3,729,280 $5,146,750 $8,783,390 $14,530,820 $17,713,035
Notes:
General levy distributions represent primary tax rate areas (TRAs) 4000, 4002, 4004, 4058, 4083, 4085, 4008, 4080
Does not include property tax overrides above 1% general levy
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 6 of 16
Page 433
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Tax In-Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fees (MVLF)
Total AV within CITY (FY 2019-20)$27,642,340,160
Current Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF (2019-2020)$20,193,480
Prop Tax In-Lieu of MVLF per $1M of AV $731
Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2023 2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated Project Assessed Value $65,405,338 $5,047,498,089 $6,822,105,358 $7,532,155,563 $8,316,108,364
Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $47,800 $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100
Net Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $47,800 $3,687,300 $4,983,700 $5,502,400 $6,075,100
Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 7 of 16
Page 434
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Property Transfer Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated Assessed Value - SF Residential $705,605,362 $1,140,691,138 $1,259,415,188 $1,390,496,133
Estimated Property Turnover Rate 15.0%15.0%15.0%15.0%
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - SF Residential $105,840,804 $171,103,671 $188,912,278 $208,574,420
Estimated Assessed Value - Other $4,341,892,727 $5,681,414,220 $6,272,740,375 $6,925,612,231
Estimated Property Turnover Rate 5.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - Other $217,094,636 $284,070,711 $313,637,019 $346,280,612
Estimated Value of Property Transferred - Total $322,935,441 $455,174,382 $502,549,297 $554,855,031
Total Transfer Tax $1.10 per $1,000 $35,522,900 $50,069,200 $55,280,400 $61,034,100
Transfer Tax to City $0.55 per $1,000 $177,600 $250,300 $276,400 $305,200
Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2022 dollars
Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller (2022)
3/21/2022 Page 8 of 16
Page 435
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Sales Tax - Direct / On-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Project Component 2027 2032 2037 2042
Retail SF 876,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF 922,000 SF
Industrial SF Assumed to Generate Local Sales Tax Allocation 308,620 SF 313,620 SF 313,620 SF 313,620 SF
Total Sales-Generating SF 1,184,620 SF 1,235,620 SF 1,235,620 SF 1,235,620 SF
Estimated Taxable Sales $275 PSF $377,657,422 $456,656,886 $529,390,489 $613,708,669
Sales Tax to City 1.00%$3,776,574 $4,566,569 $5,293,905 $6,137,087
Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 11.50%$434,306 $525,155 $608,799 $705,765
Sales and Use Tax to City - Direct $4,210,900 $5,091,700 $5,902,700 $6,842,900
Notes:
Analysis assumes approximately 10% of industrial uses will generate locally allocated sales tax. Based on Kosmont research, local allocation varies widely according to various factors,
such as location of seller's registered office of business, location of goods at time of sale, and method of delivery to the customer. Sales may be allocated to the jurisdiction of the
fulfillment center, the jurisdiction of the seller's registered office, or the Countywide pool.
County sales tax for transportation based on Measure I (0.5%), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%)
Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales)
Taxable sales PSF factor escalated 3% annually
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 9 of 16
Page 436
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Sales Tax - Indirect / Off-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Employees 6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Empl.$6,701 $7,768 $9,005 $10,439
Estimated Employee Taxable Retail Spending $44,528,971 $57,792,325 $66,997,144 $77,668,052
Estimated Capture within City 50.0%$22,264,485 $28,896,162 $33,498,572 $38,834,026
Estimated # Occupied Dwelling Units 8,759 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU 11,179 DU
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / HH $40,323 $46,745 $54,190 $62,822
Estimated Resident Taxable Retail Spending $353,187,309 $522,547,826 $605,776,148 $702,260,583
Estimated Capture within City 50.0%$176,593,654 $261,273,913 $302,888,074 $351,130,291
Estimated # Occupied Hotel Rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms 128 rooms
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Room $21,157 $24,526 $28,433 $32,962
Estimated Resident Taxable Retail Spending $2,713,353 $3,145,520 $3,646,520 $4,227,316
Estimated Capture within City 25.0%$678,338 $786,380 $911,630 $1,056,829
Total Estimated Indirect Taxable Sales $199,536,478 $290,956,456 $337,298,276 $391,021,146
Less Estimated Capture Within District Retail (5.0%)($9,976,824)($14,547,823)($16,864,914)($19,551,057)
Net Indirect Taxable Sales $189,559,654 $276,408,633 $320,433,362 $371,470,089
Sales Tax to City 1.00%$1,895,597 $2,764,086 $3,204,334 $3,714,701
Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 11.50%$217,994 $317,870 $368,498 $427,191
Sales and Use Tax to City - Indirect $2,113,600 $3,082,000 $3,572,800 $4,141,900
Notes:
County sales tax for transportation based on Measure I (0.5%), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%)
Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales)
Employee spending estimates based on "Office Worker Retail Spending Patterns: A Downtown and Suburban Area Study," ICSC (2004).
Household spending based on average houshold income within City.
Hotel guest spending estimated based on American Hotel and Lodging Association (AHLA) data.
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 10 of 16
Page 437
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") to City
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Hotel Rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms 171 rooms
Average Daily Room Rate (ADR)$174 $202 $234 $271
Average Occupancy Rate 73%73%73%73%
Annual Hotel Room Receipts $7,922,992 $9,184,919 $10,647,839 $12,343,763
TOT to City 10.00%$792,300 $918,500 $1,064,800 $1,234,400
Notes:
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
3/21/2022 Page 11 of 16
Page 438
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Service Population
City Population 175,131
City Employee Population 79,840
Employee Weighting for Service Population 0.5
Weighted # Employees 39,920
Total Service Population 215,051
Source: CA Department of Finance, CA Employment Development Department (2021)
3/21/2022 Page 12 of 16
Page 439
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Multipler Revenue and Expenditure Factors
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
Budget Category
Adopted City
Budget Allocation Basis
Relevant City
Population /
Factor
Discount for
Operational
Efficiency
Per Capita
Factor
Annual
Escalation 2027 2032 2037 2042
Revenues
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $735,370 As % of Total Sales Tax $31,965,020 0%2.30%N/A 2.30%2.30%2.30%2.30%
Franchise Fees $7,572,760 Service Population 215,051 0%$35.21 3.0%$40.82 $47.32 $54.86 $63.60
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$2,698,710 Per Employee 79,840 0%$33.80 3.0%$39.19 $45.43 $52.66 $61.05
Animal Licenses $270,000 Per Resident 175,131 0%$1.54 3.0%$1.79 $2.07 $2.40 $2.78
Fines and Forfeitures $1,004,750 Service Population 215,051 0%$4.67 3.0%$5.42 $6.28 $7.28 $8.44
Use of Money and Property $1,553,990 Service Population 215,051 0%$7.23 3.0%$8.38 $9.71 $11.26 $13.05
Charges for Services $3,472,090 Per Resident 175,131 0%$19.83 3.0%$22.98 $26.64 $30.89 $35.81
Intergovernmental $214,580 Service Population 215,051 0%$1.00 3.0%$1.16 $1.34 $1.55 $1.80
Other Revenue $3,598,000 Service Population 215,051 0%$16.73 3.0%$19.40 $22.48 $26.07 $30.22
Transfers In $1,722,910 Service Population 215,051 0%$8.01 3.0%$9.29 $10.77 $12.48 $14.47
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $2,674,960 Service Population 215,051 0%$12.44 3.0%$14.42 $16.72 $19.38 $22.47
Total Selected Revenues $25,518,120
Expenditures
Police $46,958,580 Service Population 215,051 0%$218.36 3.0%$253.14 $293.46 $340.20 $394.38
Non-departmental $5,863,390 Service Population 215,051 25%$20.45 3.0%$23.71 $27.48 $31.86 $36.93
City Council $137,600 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.48 3.0%$0.56 $0.64 $0.75 $0.87
City Management $1,079,110 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.76 3.0%$4.36 $5.06 $5.86 $6.80
City Clerk $1,980 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.01 3.0%$0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01
Animal Care and Services $3,189,380 Per Resident 175,131 25%$13.66 3.0%$15.83 $18.36 $21.28 $24.67
Records Management $519,850 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.81 3.0%$2.10 $2.44 $2.82 $3.27
Healthy RC Program $620,230 Per Resident 175,131 25%$2.66 3.0%$3.08 $3.57 $4.14 $4.80
Community Affairs $548,640 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.91 3.0%$2.22 $2.57 $2.98 $3.46
Admin. Services - Admin $190,750 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.67 3.0%$0.77 $0.89 $1.04 $1.20
Business Licensing $378,360 Per Employee 79,840 25%$3.55 3.0%$4.12 $4.78 $5.54 $6.42
City Facilities $1,009,270 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.52 3.0%$4.08 $4.73 $5.48 $6.36
Finance $1,598,930 Service Population 215,051 25%$5.58 3.0%$6.46 $7.49 $8.69 $10.07
Innovation and Tech Services $3,917,550 Service Population 215,051 25%$13.66 3.0%$15.84 $18.36 $21.29 $24.68
Human Resources $596,590 Service Population 215,051 25%$2.08 3.0%$2.41 $2.80 $3.24 $3.76
Procurement $266,770 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.93 3.0%$1.08 $1.25 $1.45 $1.68
Risk Management $298,600 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.04 3.0%$1.21 $1.40 $1.62 $1.88
Treasury Management $6,140 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.02 3.0%$0.02 $0.03 $0.03 $0.04
City Telecommunications $241,490 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.84 3.0%$0.98 $1.13 $1.31 $1.52
Economic and Comm. Development $886,470 Service Population 215,051 25%$3.09 3.0%$3.58 $4.15 $4.82 $5.58
Building and Safety $1,911,330 Service Population 215,051 25%$6.67 3.0%$7.73 $8.96 $10.39 $12.04
Engineering $2,569,690 Service Population 215,051 25%$8.96 3.0%$10.39 $12.04 $13.96 $16.19
Fire Facilities Maintenance $372,330 Service Population 215,051 25%$1.30 3.0%$1.51 $1.75 $2.02 $2.35
City Facilities Maintenance $3,747,020 Service Population 215,051 25%$13.07 3.0%$15.15 $17.56 $20.36 $23.60
Planning $1,976,590 Service Population 215,051 25%$6.89 3.0%$7.99 $9.26 $10.74 $12.45
Planning Commission $20,390 Service Population 215,051 25%$0.07 3.0%$0.08 $0.10 $0.11 $0.13
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $1,181,990 Service Population 215,051 25%$4.12 3.0%$4.78 $5.54 $6.42 $7.45
Street Maintenance $2,563,580 Service Population 215,051 25%$8.94 3.0%$10.36 $12.02 $13.93 $16.15
Park Maintenance $3,016,970 Per Resident 175,131 25%$12.92 3.0%$14.98 $17.36 $20.13 $23.34
Community Improvement $849,820 Service Population 215,051 25%$2.96 3.0%$3.44 $3.98 $4.62 $5.35
Community Services $8,641,020 Service Population 215,051 25%$30.14 3.0%$34.94 $40.50 $46.95 $54.43
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$38,050,430 Service Population 215,051 50%$88.47 3.0%$102.56 $118.89 $137.83 $159.78
Total Selected Expenditures $133,210,840
Notes:
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax
Non-recurring licenses and permits excluded (e.g. building permits)
Non-recurring charges for services excluded (e.g. plan check and engineering fees)
Fire Fund other revenues excluding property tax
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021-2022 Adopted Budget
3/21/2022 Page 13 of 16
Page 440
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Multipler Revenues and Expenditures
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20
2027 2032 2037 2042
Estimated # Residents 19,708 25,152 25,152 25,152
Estimated # Employees 6,646 7,440 7,440 7,440
Total Project Service Population 23,031 28,872 28,872 28,872
Budget Category 2027 2032 2037 2042
Revenues
Prop 172 Half Cent Sales Tax $145,500 $188,000 $218,000 $252,700
Franchise Fees $940,200 $1,366,300 $1,584,000 $1,836,300
Business Licenses (incl. penalties)$260,400 $338,000 $391,800 $454,200
Animal Licenses $35,200 $52,100 $60,400 $70,000
Fines and Forfeitures $124,700 $181,300 $210,200 $243,600
Use of Money and Property $192,900 $280,400 $325,000 $376,800
Charges for Services $453,000 $670,200 $776,900 $900,600
Intergovernmental $26,600 $38,700 $44,900 $52,000
Other Revenue $446,700 $649,200 $752,600 $872,400
Transfers In $213,900 $310,900 $360,400 $417,800
Fire Fund - Other Revenues $332,100 $482,600 $559,500 $648,600
Total Multiplier Revenues $3,171,200 $4,557,700 $5,283,700 $6,125,000
Expenditures
Police $5,829,900 $8,472,700 $9,822,200 $11,386,600
Non-departmental $546,000 $793,400 $919,800 $1,066,300
City Council $12,800 $18,600 $21,600 $25,000
City Management $100,500 $146,000 $169,300 $196,200
City Clerk $200 $300 $300 $400
Animal Care and Services $312,100 $461,700 $535,200 $620,500
Records Management $48,400 $70,300 $81,600 $94,500
Healthy RC Program $60,700 $89,800 $104,100 $120,700
Community Affairs $51,100 $74,200 $86,100 $99,800
Admin. Services - Admin $17,800 $25,800 $29,900 $34,700
Business Licensing $27,400 $35,500 $41,200 $47,800
City Facilities $94,000 $136,600 $158,300 $183,500
Finance $148,900 $216,400 $250,800 $290,800
Innovation and Tech Services $364,800 $530,100 $614,600 $712,500
Human Resources $55,600 $80,700 $93,600 $108,500
Procurement $24,800 $36,100 $41,800 $48,500
Risk Management $27,800 $40,400 $46,800 $54,300
Treasury Management $600 $800 $1,000 $1,100
City Telecommunications $22,500 $32,700 $37,900 $43,900
Economic and Comm. Development $82,500 $120,000 $139,100 $161,200
Building and Safety $178,000 $258,600 $299,800 $347,600
Engineering $239,300 $347,700 $403,100 $467,300
Fire Facilities Maintenance $34,700 $50,400 $58,400 $67,700
City Facilities Maintenance $348,900 $507,100 $587,800 $681,400
Planning $184,000 $267,500 $310,100 $359,500
Planning Commission $1,900 $2,800 $3,200 $3,700
Vehicle and Equip. Maintenance $110,100 $159,900 $185,400 $215,000
Street Maintenance $238,700 $346,900 $402,200 $466,200
Park Maintenance $295,200 $436,700 $506,300 $586,900
Community Improvement $79,100 $115,000 $133,300 $154,500
Community Services $804,600 $1,169,300 $1,355,600 $1,571,500
Fire Fund (Non-General Fund)$2,362,000 $3,432,700 $3,979,400 $4,613,300
Total Multiplier Expenditures $12,704,900 $18,476,700 $21,419,800 $24,831,400
Notes:
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax
Non-recurring licenses and permits excluded (e.g. building permits)
Non-recurring charges for services excluded (e.g. plan check and engineering fees)
Fire Fund other revenues excluding property tax
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2022 dollars.
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021-2022 Adopted Budget
3/21/2022 Page 14 of 16
Page 441
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
IMPLAN Inputs
Construction Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Industry Spending)
58 - Construction of new multifamily residential structures $3,254,712,320
57 - Construction of new single family residential structures $935,764,036
55 - Construction of new commercial structures, including farm structures $327,172,000
51 - Construction of new manufacturing structures $1,078,854,176
Ongoing Operation Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Employment Change)
470 - Office administrative services 634 Jobs
412 - Retail - Miscellaneous store retailers 2,305 Jobs
422 - Warehousing and storage 4,182 Jobs
448 - Tenant-occupied housing 205 Jobs
507 - Hotels and motels, including casino hotels 114 Jobs
3/21/2022 Page 15 of 16
Page 442
Appendix D: Rancho Cucamonga EIFD - Fiscal Impact Analysis DRAFT
Summary of IMPLAN Economic Benefits
Economic Benefits from Construction (One-Time / Short-Term)
Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site)53,072 $3,590,719,145 $5,596,502,532
Indirect 4,416 $233,897,654 $705,771,484
Induced 11,965 $556,461,858 $1,812,629,755
Total Countywide 69,452 $4,381,078,657 $8,114,903,770
Estimated City Capture 53,891 $3,630,237,121 $5,722,422,594
Economic Benefits from Ongoing Operation (Annual)
Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site)7,440 $323,914,005 $757,152,868
Indirect 1,411 $66,532,298 $202,224,372
Induced 1,163 $54,129,137 $176,526,832
Total Countywide 10,015 $444,575,439 $1,135,904,072
Estimated City Capture 7,569 $329,947,077 $776,090,428
Notes
100% of direct benefits estimated to be captured on-site within the City.
5% of indirect and induced benefits estimated to be captured off-site within the City.
Estimated ongoing benefits upon build-out and stabilization.
3/21/2022 Page 16 of 16
Page 443
Overview of the Rancho Cucamonga
EIFD and Infrastructure Financing Plan
May 18, 2022
Outline
I.EIFD Overview and Background
II.Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) Contents
III.Next Steps and Timing
Background and Summary
•An EIFD is a critical tool to address infrastructure
funding which would catalyze significant new private
sector investment and development of regional
significance by capturing value from future
development in the form of future property tax
increment.
•The purpose of today’s meeting is for the City Council
and Fire Board to independently consider the approval
of the IFP and the contribution of future incremental
property tax as prescribed within the IFP.
City Council
adopted ROI
Fire District
adopted
Resolution to
participate in
RC EIFD
IFP prepared
and posted on
website
Public notices
sent to property
owners and
residents, taxing
entities, and
published in the
newspaper
PFA presented
the IFP
Planning
Commission
presented the
IFP for
conformity with
General Plan
First public
hearing of the
PFA
City Council and
Fire Board
consider
Resolutions to
Approve IFP
and allocate
incremental
taxes
Second and
Third public
hearing of
the PFA
MarchFebruary April May June/July
Background and Summary
EIFD Fundamentals
45 years from first bond issuance; long-term committed revenuesLong Term
Districts
Public Financing Authority (PFA) implements Infrastructure Financing
Plan (IFP) –IFP is the investment plan of the EIFD, managed by the PFAGovernance
Mandatory public hearings for formation (includes protest
opportunity); no public vote to issue debtApprovals
EIFD project areas do not have to be contiguous,allowing them
to target specific sites / areas
Non-
contiguous
Areas
Any property with useful life of 15+ years & of communitywide
significance
Eligible
Projects
Does NOT increase property taxes
Tax Increment Mechanics
Illustrative
$0M
$100M
$200M
$300M
$400M
$500M
$600M
$700M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Baseline A/V
Incremental Growth of Existing A/V
Incremental A/V from
New Development
Years from District Formation
Assessed Value
(A/V) within TIF
District
Boundaries
Increment
Available
to TIF
District
Period of New
Development
Prelim inary EIFD Boundary
•Approx.1,500 acres
•Approx.$729M in
existing assessed value
•Strategically captures
value from potential
future development
and optimize the
EIFD’s ability to finance
public facilities
Future Development Assumptions
Absorption Assumed over 5 -20 Years
Area # SF or Units Estimated
AV Factor
Estimated
Total AV at
Buildout
For-sale Residential 1,514 units $618,000 per unit $936 million
Rental Residential 10,253 units $317,000 per unit $3.255 billion
Hotel 171 rooms $162,000 per room $28 million
Commercial / Retail 922,000 SF $274 PSF $253 million
Office 222,000 SF $211 PSF $47 million
Industrial 6,272,400 SF $172 PSF $1.079 billion
Total New Development Assumed within EIFD Study Area $5.597 billion
Targeted Infrastructure Improvements
Potential Priority Projects Estimated Cost Estimated Timing
1) Parking infrastructure and related
improvements between Haven Avenue
and Day Creek Boulevard along Foothill
Corridor
$20-40M 2028-2032
2) Transportation Connectivity
Improvements linking Cucamonga Station
and Haven / Arrow focus area
$40-60M 2028-2032
Estimated Total Priority Projects $60-100M
•Potential projects were identified based on alignment of timing of funding
needs and timing of EIFD funding capacity
•Projects would catalyze and support future development while delivering
significant communitywide benefits
Regional and Communitywide Significance
•Implementation of essential infrastructure improvements of communitywide and regional
benefit
•Social impacts: Quality of life improvement, environmental sustainability
•Housing: 11,700+ units
•Economic benefits:
7,440+permanent, direct jobs from operation; additional 2,500+ indirect and induced
permanent jobs, supporting $445M+in ongoing annual wages in the County
53,000+temporary construction-related jobs*, supporting $4.4B in temporary wages in
the County
•Acceleration of development and related fiscal revenues:
Significant positive net fiscal impact to City General Fund and Fire Protection District
(net of allocation of tax increment to EIFD and net of municipal service costs for new
development)
Financing Section
•Based on projected growth of assessed value and property tax increment,
the City and Fire District would be allocating incremental tax revenues of:
•City –38% of projected property tax increment (no MVLF) ($98 million)
•Fire -26% of projected property tax increment ($158 million)
•Proposed funding scenario supports up to $100 million in debt issuance for
targeted infrastructure, as well as related future maintenance costs.
•Total debt service estimates for a 30-year bond is $233 million.
•Strategy was to generate sufficient EIFD funding capacity for the estimated
costs of public facilities, maintenance, and administration.
Financing Section
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46
Total Annual Revenue
City Percentage
Fire Percentage
Years from District FormationAllocation Contribution
Next Steps
•City Council and Fire Board consideration of
Resolutions approving IFP.
•PFA will hold two more public hearings
before considering the approval of the IFP at
the third public hearing.
Task Target Date
City Council and Fire Board consideration of
resolution approving IFP
May 18, 2022(Today)
PFA holds Public Hearing #2 June 14, 2022
PFA holds Public Hearing #3 and protest
proceeding
July 19, 2022
Staff files EIFD with BOE per guidelines for
Change of Jurisdictional Boundaries
August 2022
Next Steps
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Elisa C. Cox, Assistant City Manager
Michael Parmer, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety
Response to 2022 Holiday Lights Display and Consideration of a
Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet
Streets, West Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a
Portion of Turquoise Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets,
to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2022 Holiday Light Display.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2022-053) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-053, temporarily closing
portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, west of Sapphire Street and east of Turquoise
Avenue, and a portion of Turquoise Avenue between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to
pedestrian traffic during the area’s Holiday Light Display for the 2022 holiday season.
BACKGROUND:
For more than 20 years, the residents of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets have created a visual
display of lights during the weeks leading up to Christmas. With the advent of social media, the
light displays now attract visitors from all over Southern California. Over the last 10 years, the
Holiday Lights Display, and the overwhelming crowds it attracts, created substantial public safety
concerns as well as significant impacts on the quality of life for area residents who are not part of
the Holiday Lights Display.
Although the City provides police and traffic support to manage the crowds and minimize impacts
on adjacent neighborhoods, the City has always made it clear that it is not an official City-
sponsored event. The large crowds create significant public safety and community concerns.
Multiple departments are impacted; the Police, Engineering Services, and Public Works Services
Departments along with the City Manager’s Office collaborate each year to provide a high level
of specialty services to mitigate these impacts and elevate the safety of the residents and visitors,
which is quite costly. Plans are reviewed internally and with the community each year in an effort
to adapt to the ever-growing event.
The Holiday Lights Display, and the overwhelming crowds it attracts, has created substantial
public safety concerns as well as significant impacts on the quality of life for area residents who
are not part of the Holiday Lights Display. Key findings from past years include:
Page 444
Page 2
1
2
7
5
Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets and Turquoise Avenue are narrow, two-lane
residential streets with no sidewalks and are not intended to handle substantial
amounts of vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
Traffic counts demonstrate a startling number of pedestrians and vehicles which
creates a dangerous situation for pedestrians and motorists.
Pedestrians, including children, are routinely observed traversing back and forth
across the street in between vehicles. At the same time, drivers are distracted by the
holiday displays.
Residents in the surrounding neighborhoods experience significant inconveniences
from the large volume of visitors such as illegal parking, blocking driveways, litter and
human excrement in their yards, vandalism, trespassing, noise and the extreme delays
in ingress and egress into their residential neighborhoods.
In response to these critical public safety concerns, and with Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department’s (“RCPD”) recommendation, the City in 2017 transitioned the Holiday Light Display
into a Drive-Thru Only experience by limiting pedestrian traffic during certain peak times due to
unsafe conditions that have been observed in the past.
ANALYSIS:
For the fifth year in a row, RCPD successfully implemented the Drive-Thru Only Ordinance. Due
to COVID-19 state health orders, and consistent with the previous year, the Drive-Thru Only
Ordinance, which restricts pedestrian access, was implemented for the entire 2021 holiday
season, from December 3-5 and December 10-24 to minimize large crowds and close contact
amongst different households. RCPD and City staff have continued to receive positive comments
regarding the Drive-Thru Only Ordinance and how it has improved conditions in the areas
surrounding Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets.
In comparing vehicular traffic between the 2020 and 2021 holiday season, traffic increased 13.1%
for the Holiday Light corridor; Hillside Road increased 15%, Carnelian Street increased 14%, and
Sapphire Street increased 11%. This is a reversal of a downward trend that was previously being
experienced since the transition to Drive-Thru Only and the second consecutive year traffic
increased.
Over the last several years, RCPD has also collected data regarding from where (by zip code)
visitors were coming to the Holiday Lights. For the 2021 holiday season, 83 percent of visitors
came from a zip code outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, up slightly from 78 percent of
visitors in 2020.
During the months leading up to the holiday season, RCPD and the City’s CAN Team executed
an aggressive communications strategy to educate the public for the upcoming holiday
season. Efforts include information mailings, video announcements and social media
posts. Electronic message board signage was strategically placed in the area announcing the
pedestrian restrictions. The City’s Holiday Lights webpage received 77,009 views during the
month of December 2021, up from 33,400 in December 2020.
Page 445
Page 3
1
2
7
5
RCPD also worked with DoIT (the City’s Department of Innovation and Technology) to again
deploy the online event registration portal, allowing residents within the affected area to register
their parties/get-togethers so that their guests can be allowed through the deputy-staffed check-
in areas. During the 2021 holiday season, residents within the affected area registered 206
parties/get-togethers during the Drive-Thru Only period. This is a 47% increase from the previous
years. 39 valid addresses were registered through the online event registration portal and the
average party size was approximately 23 (calculated by removing 4 parties by three addresses
of the lowest guests and five addresses with the highest number of guests).
Residents who wish to host parties or events, may do so, but will need to register all guests thru
the portal. Procedures are currently being developed to verify registered guests with the house
they are visiting. Guests will not be allowed to go into the closure area until confirmation is
verified. Guests will only be allowed to go directly to, and from, the house where the party is
located.
With Drive-Thru Only proving to be an effective strategy in reducing the unsafe conditions and
the negative impacts on the surrounding area residents, it is recommended that it again be
implemented for the 2022 holiday season from December 2 to December 24, 2021, It is
recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing Drive-Thru Only
on the dates identified above for the 2022 holiday season.
FISCAL IMPACT:
RCPD incurred a total of $150,000 in personnel costs in order to staff the Holiday Light Display.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The City’s response to the Holiday Light Display is consistent with the City Council’s goal of
promoting a safe community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-053
Page 446
1
2
4
3
0
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TEMPORARILY CLOSING PORTIONS OF
THOROUGHBRED AND JENNET STREETS, WEST OF SAPPHIRE
STREET AND EAST OF TURQUOISE AVENUE, AND A PORTION OF
TURQUOISE AVENUE BETWEEN JENNET AND THOROUGHBRED
STREETS, TO PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC DURING THE AREA’S HOLIDAY
LIGHT DISPLAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals
1. The elaborate display of holiday lights and decorations by residents of
Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, west of Sapphire Street and east of Turquoise Avenue,
and Turquoise Avenue between Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, during the month of
December (the “Holiday Light Display”) is an example of the community’s holiday spirit,
hard work, and creativity, which has grown over the last thirty years into one of the largest
holiday light displays in Southern California, drawing viewers from across the region.
2. In recent years, however, the popularity of the Holiday Light Display has led
to a surge in vehicular and pedestrian traffic, particularly on and around portions of
Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, and Turquoise Avenue, resulting in a variety of
negative impacts that threaten the health, safety, and welfare of members of the public.
3. At the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on May 18, 2022, the City
Council received evidence concerning the negative impacts and dangerous conditions
created by the Holiday Light Display prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby find,
determine, conclude, and resolve as follows:
1. Based on evidence presented to the City Council at the above-referenced
meeting on May 18, 2022, the City Council finds as follows:
a. All facts set forth in Part A, Recitals, of this Resolution are true and
correct.
b. Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, and Turquoise Avenue are
narrow, two-lane, residential streets with no sidewalks, which are not intended to handle
substantial amounts of vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
c. An estimated 5,000 to 10,000 vehicles travel through these streets
each day during the busiest periods of the Holiday Light Display, in addition to pedestrians
who park in neighboring communities and walk into the area.
Page 447
2
2
4
3
0
d. Traffic during the Holiday Light Display has increased to where the
average wait time to enter can reach approximately two hours, followed by an additional
hour and a half to travel through the streets. On busy evenings, traffic can back up to the
210 Freeway, approximately one mile away.
e. Large trucks, hot rods, and tour buses, which are normally
uncommon on Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, and Turquoise Avenue, have been
increasingly common in the area during the Holiday Lights Display, which creates
additional dangers for pedestrians because they tend to take up larger portions of the
road and require additional skill and attention to safely maneuver.
f. The exceedingly high number of vehicles and presence of larger-
than-normal vehicles in the area results in noise and air pollution to pedestrians and
surrounding residents.
g. Traffic and safety problems are exacerbated by the large volume of
pedestrians in the street, causing vehicles to slow, stop, or idle to avoid collisions. At any
one time, as many as 5,000 pedestrians are in the roadway.
h. Due to the absence of sidewalks on Thoroughbred and Jennet
Streets, and Turquoise Avenue, pedestrians mainly travel in the roadway, which creates
a danger both to pedestrians and those traveling in vehicles.
i. Pedestrians have been routinely observed traversing back and forth
across the street to view the holiday displays. At the same time, drivers are distracted by
the holiday displays. With drivers and pedestrians both distracted, the potential for an
accident involving a pedestrian substantially increases.
j. The Holiday Light Display attracts many families with young children
to the area. In some instances, children have been observed wandering unsupervised.
Children are therefore at increased risk of being hit by a vehicle while walking in the street.
k. Pedestrians frequently visit the Holiday Light Display expecting to
find public restrooms. As no public restrooms are located nearby, pedestrians have been
identified using nearby horse trails and dark residential areas to urinate, defecate, and
discard hazardous waste.
l. The Chief of Police and Fire Chief have determined that, due to
increased vehicle and pedestrian traffic during the Holiday Light Display and limited street
capacity, emergency personnel might not be able to safely and timely respond to potential
emergencies in the surrounding community.
m. The negative impacts and dangerous conditions created by the
Holiday Light Display would be mitigated if the affected portions of Thoroughbred and
Jennet Streets, and Turquoise Avenue were temporarily closed to pedestrian traffic during
the Holiday Light Display. In the absence of pedestrians, vehicular traffic flow would
improve and emergency vehicles would have improved access because they could pass
Page 448
3
2
4
3
0
on either side of the one-way vehicular traffic. Furthermore, potential accidents involving
vehicles and pedestrians would be reduced.
n. Vehicle Code Section 21101(e) authorizes the City, to act by
resolution, to temporarily close a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local
special events, and other purposes when, in the opinion of the City Council, the closing
is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the
street during the temporary closing.
o. The Holiday Light Display, although not City sponsored, constitutes
a local special event for the purposes of Vehicle Code Section 21101(e).
2. Based on the facts set forth in the preceding Section 1 of this Resolution
and all available information, the City Council hereby finds that the temporary closure of
portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, and Turquoise Avenue to pedestrian traffic,
except for residents of the homes within the affected area and their guests, during the
Holiday Light Display is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use
the streets during the Holiday Light Display.
3. Based on the finding made in the preceding Section 2 of this Resolution and
pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21101(e), the City Council hereby closes
those portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets west of Sapphire Street and east of
Turquoise Avenue and Turquoise Avenue between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets (as
identified on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) to all
pedestrian traffic except for residents of the homes on the affected streets and their
guests from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. from December 2 to December 24, 2022.
4. The Chief of Police, in consultation with the City Engineer or designee, shall
erect, or cause to be erected and maintained, sufficient temporary signs, barriers, and
other temporary traffic control devices, to preclude pedestrians from traversing those
portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets as shown on Exhibit A, except to residents,
during the closure period.
5. The Chief of Police, City Engineer, and City Manager may adjust closure
days and hours based on traffic, weather, COVID-19, or other conditions which impact
public safety.
6. The City Manager is further authorized to establish procedures to verify
exceptions for residents of the homes on the affected streets and their guests from 5:00
p.m. to 11:00 p.m. from December 2 to December 24, 2022.
7. This resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c), existing facilities.
Thoroughbred and Jennet streets and Turquoise Avenue are existing streets and the
proposed temporary closure of those streets during the Holiday Light Display constitutes
a minor change in their operation. The temporary street closure will only affect a portion
of Thoroughbred and Jennet streets between Sapphire Street and Turquoise Avenue and
Turquoise Avenue between Jennet and Thoroughbred streets during a select number of
Page 449
4
2
4
3
0
days and for a limited period of time between 5:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Residents of the
affected portions of the streets will continue to have access to their homes at all times
and the streets will continue to be accessible by car. Due to the significant vehicular and
pedestrian traffic impacts during the Holiday Light Display, the temporary closure is
anticipated to reduce an existing significant traffic and safety impact in a portion of the
City.
8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of __________ 2022.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
_______________________________
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Janice C. Reynolds
City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a Regular Meeting of said Council held on May 18, 2022.
Executed this day May 18, 2022 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
_______________________________
Janice C. Reynolds
City Clerk
Page 450
5
2
4
3
0
Page 451
H3. Response to 2021 Holiday
Lights Display & Recommendations
for 2022 Holiday Season
May 18, 2022
Background
•Over the last 10 years, the Holiday Lights Display has attracted
overwhelming crowds, creating substantial public safety
concerns and quality of life impacts to area residents
•In February 2021, City Council:
•Established Drive-Thru Only on December 3 –5 and 10 –24,
from 5:00 to 11:00 p.m.
•Allowed pedestrians to walk the loop from December 6 –9
Findings that led to Drive Thru Only:
•Thoroughbred, Jennet, and Turquoise are narrow streets
with no sidewalks
•Traffic counts confirm a significant public safety concern
•Pedestrians are intermingled with vehicles and drivers are
distracted by light displays
•Neighborhood Impacts: trash, vandalism, illegal parking,
trespassing, traffic, etc.
In Preparation of Drive -Thru Only:
•Deployment Plan developed by RCPD
•Aggressive communications strategy
•Mechanism implemented to allow access for
residents’ guests through a phone application.
Guest Registry Portal
•Online guest registry portal launched
•206 events registered throughout the
month of December
•Increase of 47% from previous
year
•39 valid addresses were
registered
•Effective tool in assisting deputies to
determine appropriate pedestrian
access into the loop
•No complaints reported
Community Outreach Efforts
•77,009 Unique Website Visitors
•131% increase
•Total Social Media Impressions:
52,862
•Facebook: 26,004
•Instagram: 15,720
•Twitter: 11,138
Drive -Thru Only Results
•Traffic counts showed a 13.1%
increase during Drive-Thru Only
•Hillside Rd: 15% increase
•Carnelian St: 14% increase
•Sapphire St: 11% increase
21.1%
-13.6%
-13.4%-2.8%
13.1%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0
900.0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 % ChangeTotal Volume(estimated)ThousandsYear
Volume & Trend
Drive -Thru Only Results
Due to the pandemic:
•Pedestrian access was limited in 2021
•83% of visitors came from a zip code outside of the City,
up from 78% in 2020
Recommendations for 2022
•It is recommended City Council adopt Resolution No.
2022-053, establishing Drive-Thru Only for the 2022
holiday season from December 2 -24, 2022.
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1003, to be Read by Title
Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to Salaries for Mayor and
Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1003) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1003, to be read
by title only and waive further reading, pertaining to salaries for Mayor and members of the City
Council.
BACKGROUND:
The California Government Code provides that a City Council may enact an ordinance providing
that each member of the city council shall receive a salary, and that a directly elected Mayor of a
general law city may be provided with additional compensation. Those salaries can be adjusted
by ordinance in an amount not to exceed 5% for each full calendar year from the operative date
of the last adjustment. Any adjustment in Council salaries takes effect following the next regularly-
scheduled City Council election.
Two (2) full calendar years have elapsed since the effective date of the last Council salary
adjustment which set the salary at $1,452 per month for Council members and $1,609 per month
for the Mayor, effective as of December 2020. Additionally, in 2012 the City’s contract with
CalPERS was amended to exclude newly-elected officials from participation in the CalPERS
pension program, effectively reducing total Council compensation for those elected in December
2012 and beyond.
ANALYSIS:
At this time, it is recommended that salaries for Mayor and members of the City Council be
adjusted commensurate with staff total compensation adjustments recently approved for the
Executive Management Group and Rancho Cucamonga Managers Association for Fiscal Year
2022/23, which is an average of 2.5% between the two groups. The following chart summarizes
the 2.5% change in salaries resulting from this action:
Current Monthly Salary Adjusted Monthly Salary
(eff. December 2022)
City Council $1,452 $1,488
Mayor $1,609 $1,649
Page 452
Page 2
1
2
6
7
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed salary adjustments will result in an additional annual cost of approximately $2,500.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item is in keeping with the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and
respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Ordinance No. 1003
Page 453
Ordinance No. 1003 - Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 1003
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SALARIES FOR
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
A.RECITALS
1.California Government Code Section 36516 provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"(a)A City Council may enact an ordinance providing that each member
of the City Council shall receive a salary."
2.Government Code subsection 36516(c) allows Council salaries to be
increased by ordinance in an amount not to exceed 5% for each full calendar year from
the operative date of the last Council salary adjustment.
3.Two full calendar years have elapsed since the effective date of the last
Council salary adjustment which set the salary at $1,452 per month, effective as of
December 2020. However, this Council intends to modify Council salaries to be
commensurate with staff total compensation increases anticipated in the coming fiscal
year, but not to exceed the limit of 5% for each calendar year for each of the past two full
calendar years.
4.Government Code Section 36516.1 provides authority for a directly elected
Mayor of a general law city to be provided with additional compensation.
B.ORDINANCE
IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Subsection A of Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"2.16.030 Salary amount and waiver.
"A. Each member of the City Council other than the Mayor shall receive as
salary the sum of one thousand four hundred eighty-eight dollars ($1,488) per month. The
Mayor shall receive the sum of one thousand six hundred forty-nine dollars ($1,649) per
month. The salary shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner as salaries are
paid to other officers and employees of the City.
Section 2.The salary increases provided for in this Ordinance shall become available
to the members of this Council during December 2022.
Section 3.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to
be published in accordance with applicable law.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 454
Ordinance No. 1003 - Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____________ 2022.
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ______________,
and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the ____ day of ______, 2 0 2 2 .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED
Executed this ______ day of ________, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Page 455
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of Resolution No. 2022-052, Amending Resolution 2022-021
to Adjust Certain City Council Benefits. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-052)
(CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-052.
BACKGROUND:
The City has for many years provided certain limited benefits to members of the City Council,
such as medical benefits and auto allowance. These benefits have not been adjusted in many
years.
In 2012, the City’s contract with CalPERS was amended to exclude newly-elected officials from
participation in the CalPERS pension program, effectively reducing total Council compensation
for those elected in December 2012 and beyond.
ANALYSIS:
At this time, it is recommended that Council benefits be adjusted modestly as follows:
Auto allowance increased from $200 to $300 per month. This amount has not been
adjusted for at least the last 15 years.
Make cash-in-lieu of medical insurance available to all members of the Council. This
benefit is currently provided to those receiving the benefit prior to September 12, 2012.
The most recent Executive Management MOU extends the cash-in-lieu option to all
members of that group, so it is recommended that the Council benefits mirror that action.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed car allowance adjustment will result in an additional annual cost of approximately
$6,000. There is no net cost for the cash-in-lieu benefit, as there would be an offsetting savings
in reduced medical insurance premium contributions for any participant(s).
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item is in keeping with the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and
respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2022-052
Page 456
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION 2022-021 TO ADJUST CERTAIN CITY COUNCIL
BENEFITS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is
necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established
prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted
salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for
employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including members of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is
necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position
titles, classifications, salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline
of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees, including members of
the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California to amend Resolution 2022-021 to amend the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members, and City Clerk and City Treasurer Current Benefits to
adjust car allowance and cash-in-lieu of medical benefits as indicated in Attachment 1 of this
resolution. Cash-in-lieu of medical insurance of $300 per month is available, subject to the salary
limit set forth in Government Code Section 36516.
PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of May 2022.
Page 457
Attachment 1 – Resolution 2022-xxx
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members, City Clerk and City Treasurer
Current Benefits
Health Insurance: City pays up to the monthly amount that Executive Management Group
employees receive for Health Insurance (currently $1,200, and
employee pays the difference between the contribution and the health
insurance premium). Cash-in-Lieu of medical of $300 per month is
available, subject to the salary limit set forth in Government Code
Section 36516.
Dental Insurance: City paid - Equivalent to the Executive Management Group benefit
Vision Insurance: City paid - Equivalent to the Executive Management Group benefit
Car Allowance: $300 per month (only available for Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City
Council)
Fire Meeting Stipend: $100 per meeting (only available for Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City
Council)
Retirement: Employee pays 7.5% of salary into APPLE (includes car allowance) -
City pays 0%. Supplemental to Social Security.
Wellness Physical: Up to $2000 per fiscal year for a physical
Page 458