HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-10-12 - SupplementalsPlanning Commission
October 12, 2022
DRC2021-00402
Project Background
•Applicant: Stor’em Self Storage
•Project Description: A request to modify an existing
Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor recreational
vehicle & indoor personal storage at an existing 123,577
square foot recreational vehicle storage facility
•Project Location:8530 Hellman Avenue & 9292 9th Street
•General Plan Designation: Neo-Industrial Employment
District
•Zoning: Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone
Project Site
ARROW ROUTE
HELLMAN AVE9TH STREET N
CUP Modification Request
•Requesting to add personal self-
storage to an existing Conditional
Use Permit (DRC2005-00704).
•The applicant has also secured a
lease agreement with the
adjacent property located at 9292
9th Street (S&K Storage) to store
RV’s and boats.
•No other changes are proposed
as part of this modification.
123,577 sf
273,500 sf
Resolution 22-27 Revision
•“The total project site consists of approximately 11 acres
of developed land located south of Arrow Route and west
of Hellman Avenue.The primary site (APN 0209-012-07)
is a rectangular shaped parcel developed with buildings
designed for indoor RV storage.The project also includes
a portion of the parcel to the south of the primary site
(APN 0209-012-06)of approximately 273,500 square feet
developed with pavement,perimeter fencing and
pavement striping for the purpose of outdoor RV storage;
and”
New Condition of Approval
•Prior to commencement of the use permitted by this
Conditional Use Permit Modification,an inspection of the
outdoor RV storage facility located at 9292 9th Street shall
be conducted by the Fire Department.Any deficiencies or
violations found by the Fire Department during inspection
shall be reconciled prior to commencement of use.
Environmental
•The project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA)and the City’s CEQA Guidelines.
•The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption
under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301—Existing
Facilities,which consists of the operation,leasing and
permitting of existing uses.
•The proposed CUP modification will permit the use of
personal storage in addition to RV storage within an
approved RV storage facility.
Noticing
•Notices mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet
(~355 mailers)on September 29,2022,published in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the site was posted
on September 29,2022
•To date,no comments/correspondence has been
received in response to these notifications
Recommendation
•Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
Approve Conditional Use Permit Modification
DRC2021-00402 through the adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Camino Predera
New Development Standards
Planning Commission
October 12, 2022
RED HILL NEIGHBORHOOD
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR RED HILL
CAMINO PREDERA NEIGHBORHOOD
CAMINO PREDERA –NORTH-TO -SOUTH ELEVATION CHANGE
HILLSIDE OVERLAY MAP
CURRENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
All residential development proposals within the Hillside Overlay follow
this process:
•Submittal of a Hillside Design Review application;
•Review by the City towards determination of Completeness;
•Design Review Committee;
•Planning Director review/action (*Planning Commission if 5±cut/fill
and/or if a Variance is requested)
Residential development proposals within Camino Predera follow this
process:
•Submittal of a Hillside Design Review application;
•Review by the City towards determination of Completeness;
•Design Review Committee;
•Neighborhood meeting;
•Planning Commission action (*all applications)
TIMELINE SUMMARY
•Workshop #1 on August 8, 2019 @ Lions Center West
o Introduction, general conversation, and determination of scope
•Workshop #2 on September 9, 2019 @ Valle Vista Elementary School
o Group sessions and discussion of preliminary standards
•Planning Commission on January 22, 2020 –hearing Continued
•Workshop #3 on January 30, 2020 @ City Hall
o Focused discussion with the residents of Camino Predera
•Workshop #4 on July 29, 2021 @ City Hall
o Discussion and sharing of proposed/preferred new standards
•Workshop #5 on March 17, 2022 @ City Hall
o Check-in discussion of potential new standards
COMPARISON OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum
Building Height
-South side of Camino
Predera 30 feet None 14 feet None 7-10 feet None
-North side of Camino
Predera 30 feet None 25 feet None 25 feet None
Building Setbacks
37 feet 37 feet
+/- 5 feet +/- 5 feet
-Rear None 20 feet None 20 feet None 20 feet
-Side None 5/10 feet None 5/10 feet None 10-15 feet
Building Separation None None None None None 10-20 feet
Excavation/Fill 5 feet None 8 feet None 8 feet None
Wall Height
-Screen (Freestanding) 6 feet None 6 feet None 6 feet None
-Retaining 4 feet None 8 feet None 8 feet None
Current
Standards
New Standards (proposed
by Staff)
New Standards proposed
by Owners (North)
-Front None None None 37 feet
CAMINO PREDERA –LOT WIDTH COMPARISONS
CAMINO PREDERA –LOT WIDTH COMPARISONS
SENATE BILL 330 (SB330)
•Cities may not change their General Plan land use designation or Zoning
for any parcel to a less intensive use;
•Includes reductions to development requirements,e.g.height,density,
FAR,and lot size;new/increased setbacks,frontage,or lot coverage ;or
anything that would lessen the intensity of housing;
•Prohibits cities from making changes to development standards for
zones that allow housing;
•However,cities are not limited if there are concurrent changes in the
standards applicable to other parcels to ensure that there is no net loss
in residential capacity.
PROPOSED CAMINO PREDERA OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Standards
Maximum Minimum
Building Height
-South side of Camino
Predera 14 feet1 None
-North side of Camino
Predera 25 feet None
Building Setbacks
-Front None 37±5 feet
-Rear None 20 feet
-Side None 5/10 feet
Excavation/Fill 8 feet None
Wall Height
-Screen (Freestanding) 6 feet None
-Retaining 8 feet None
1 - As measured from the curb at the street;
Optional Standards
PROPOSED CAMINO PREDERA OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT
REVISED REVIEW PROCESS
Applicants for development proposals that use the Optional
development standards would follow this revised process:
•Submittal of construction plans directly to the Building &Safety
Department for plan check;
•Review to verify compliance with the optional standards and other Code
requirements that apply;
•Ministerial approval of the construction plans by City staff
The following would not be necessary:
•Submittal of a Hillside Design Review application;
•Design Review Committee;
•Neighborhood meeting;
•Planning Commission review/action
CORRESPONDENCE
The subject amendments were advertised as a public hearing:
•Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper;
•Vacant properties in Camino Predera were posted ;and
•All owners of property in Tract 10035 and within 660 feet were mailed
notifications.
Staff received correspondence during the preparation of the report and
during this overall process.
The correspondence is attached to the report for the Commission’s review
and consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The amendments to the Municipal Code and Zoning Map are exempt from
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
Per CEQA Guidelines,where there is no possibility that the activity may
have effect on the environment,then it is not subject to CEQA ;
The amendments do not propose any physical change to the environment.
The new optional standards do not include a development project;
The determination is the amendments will not have a significant effect on
the environment and therefore are exempt from further environmental
review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action
through the adoption of the attached Resolution recommending Approval
to the City Council:
•Adopt Resolution No.22-28 recommending to the City Council approval
of:
o Municipal Code Amendment DRC2020-00004 to amend Title 17 of
the Municipal Code to incorporate new optional development
standards;and
o Zoning Map Amendment DRC2022-00315 to amend the Zoning
Map to establish a new Overlay Zoning District.