Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-02-22 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA February 22, 2023 7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chair Dopp Vice Chair Morales Commissioner Williams Commissioner Boling Commissioner Daniels B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of January 25, 2023. (No meeting on February grn) D. Public Hearings D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, DESIGN REVIEW AND MINOR EXCEPTION — DESIGN CONCEPTS—A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels along with the design review of two single-family residences and a minor exception to permit property line walls over the height limit due to onsite grades for a property located in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181-02. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. D2. Consideration to: Amend Articles III, IV, V, VIII and IX of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as follows: Amend Street Connectivity Standards In Certain Zones; Modify Detached Accessory Structure Standards; Amend Screening Standards; Revise Standards Related to Automobile Service Stations, Smoke Shops and Height Restrictions for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities; Amend Building Height, Faqade Types, Articulation and Block Sizes In Form-Based Zones; Clarifying Application of Floor Area Ratio Standard; Revising Permitted Building Types in the NE2 Zone; Changes To The Form-Based Zone Land Use Table; Clarify Required Non-Residential Use Intensity in Various Form-Based Zones, and Amend Various Definitions; The City Has Prepared an Addendum To The Certified El For The General Plan Update And Climate Action Plan For The Project. This Item Will Be Forwarded To The City Council For Final Action. E. Director Announcements F. Commission Announcements G. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located on the podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Communications." Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(a)-cityofrc.us by 12:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. HPC/PC Agenda — February 22, 2023 Page 2of3 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,365 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, February 16, 2023, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Agenda — February 22, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda January 25, 2023 DRAFT MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on January 25, 2023. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Vice Chair Morales, Commissioner Williams, Commissioner Boling and Commissioner Daniels. Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant. B. Public Communications Vice Chair Dopp opened the public communications and seeing no one, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of January 101h, 2023. Motion to adopt the minutes by Commissioner Boling; second by Commissioner Williams; Motion carried unanimously 5-0. D. Public Hearing D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP—WE ARCHITECTS GROUP —A request to subdivide a 3.89-acre parcel into two lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential Zone, located at 5815 Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 0225-123- 09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20655. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chair Dopp opened Public Hearing. Sia Shirazi, President, WE Architects Group, explained his clients are two brothers who wanted to have two single family residentials on this property and that is why they are separating them. The next step is to apply for a separate Design Review application for the construction of the two homes. Commissioner Daniels stated it's a very large lot and asked is it going to be single family. Sia Shirazi answered yes. Chair Dopp closed Public Hearing. Commissioner Boling stated the property to the north appears to be a utility (water reclamation facility) site. He asked if staff knew who the ownership is to the vacant parcels to the east. Vincent Acuna answered he does not. Chair Dopp stated considering it is a water reclamation site, he asked is there any concerns of odor. Vincent Acuna answered there are no odor concerns. He said when the project does come in for Design Review, it will go through the normal City process, and will take that into account. Vice Chair Morales stated he knows the neighborhood, and to subdivide the lot makes sense and it's a good idea. Commissioner Boling mentioned the ownership of the vacant parcels belong to Cucamonga Valley Water District. Motion to adopt Resolution 23-01 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20655 by Commissioner Boling; second by Commissioner Daniels. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote. E. Director Announcements Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, announced the first February meeting will likely be cancelled. F. Commission Announcements - None G. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Boling to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chair Dopp adjourned the meeting at 7:11 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: HPC/PC MINUTES—January 25, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Draft RANCHOoil CITY OF ■ ► DATE: February 22, 2023 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matt Marquez, Planning and Economic Development Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, DESIGN REVIEW AND MINOR EXCEPTION—DESIGN CONCEPTS — A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels along with the design review of two single-family residences and a Minor Exception to permit property line walls over the height limit due to onsite grades for a property located in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181- 02. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407, and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Subdivision of 1.93 acres into 2 residential parcels of land including the design review of 2 single-family residences, and a Minor Exception for additional wall height due to on-site grades. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The undeveloped 1.93-acre project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue. The property's dimensions are approximately 290 feet in width along the north and south property lines and 247 feet along the east and west property lines. The downslope lot has an elevation of 1,800 feet as measured at the north property line and 1,781 feet along the south property line, for a total grade change of 19 feet. The street improvements have not been installed along Archibald Avenue. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) ANALYSIS: Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to subdivide 1.93 acres of land for the development of tow 2- story single-family residences. The proposed subdivision and single-family residences meet or exceed all applicable technical development standards for the Very Low (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay except for wall height as shown in the table below: Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Lot Width Parcel 1 — 121 feet 90 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 125 feet Lot Depth Parcel 1 — 290 feet 200 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 290 feet Lot Size Parcel 1 — 35,762 Square Feet 20,000 Square Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 35,878 Square Feet Building Height 30 Feet 30 Feet YES Parcel 1 - 52 Feet Front Setback Parcel 2 - 52 Feet 42 feet (+/- 5 feet) YES Parcel 1 —23/37 Feet Side Setbacks 10/15 Feet YES Parcel 2 —25/25 Feet Parcel 1 - 152 Feet Rear Setback 60 Feet YES Parcel 2 - 143 Feet Excavation Less than 5 Feet Cut or Fill 5 Feet YES Retaining Walls 4 Feet 4 Feet YES Free Standing 8 feet 6 feet NO* Walls Parcel 1 — 14.3% Lot Coverage Parcel 2 — 16.5% 25 Percent YES *The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception for wall height Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT20297 includes 2 numbered lots and 1 lettered lot with vehicle access provided from Archibald Avenue. Design Review DRC2021-00407: The project includes the design review of two 2-story single-family residences. The proposed residences have a Mediterranean architectural design theme, which includes a Spanish tile roof, stucco finish, cast stone window and door surrounds, and wrought iron railings. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of second-story decks. The residences will be painted earth-tone colors, as recommended in the Hillside Design Guidelines, and will be in keeping with the residences in the surrounding area, which include a variety of architectural styles and themes. Plan#1 is 6,583 square feet of living area with a 1,265 square foot 6-car garage. Plan #2 is 7,755 square feet of living area and two 2-car garages totaling 968 square feet. Minor Exception DRC2022-00340: The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden walls on top of retaining walls) along the south and a portion of the east property lines with a maximum calculated height of up to 8 feet. The additional wall height is necessary due to onsite grades. The findings of facts are provided in the draft Resolution of approval which is included with this staff report as Exhibit G. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on November 7, 2022, with 6 residents in attendance. The meeting intended to solicit input from property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. The applicant presented the project and addressed the neighbor's questions related to grading, wall height, and building pad height. The applicant stated that there was minimal change in grade to the area where the footprint of the two homes will be located and that the building pad of the northern lot would be approximately 7 feet below and the southern lot 17 feet below the finished grade of the existing residence to the north. They assured the residents that the finished grades and drainage would match that shown on the preliminary grading plan and would not negatively impact the adjacent lots. It should be noted that the resident to the north remained concerned related to the proposed grading and the building height of the proposed residences. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee (Williams, Morales, and McPherson) on November 1, 2022. Staff presented an overview of the project and the Committee recommended the project move forward for full Planning Commission review as proposed. Trails Advisory Committee: The project was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee (Boling, Tisler Brennan, McPherson) on November 9, 2022. The site plan for the project includes the required 15-foot wide private equestrian trail which is proposed to be located between the two parcels with the required 24 by 24-foot corral areas located at the eastern terminus of the trail. The committee was overall accepting of the trail alignment and recommended that the project be conditioned to include a minimum 36-inch separation between bollards at the westerly trail access and that a 15-foot section of wrought iron fence be included in the east property line wall at the terminus of the private equestrian trail to provide the opportunity for a future trail connection when the property to the east is redeveloped. Public Art: Residential development of 3 or fewer units is exempt from Chapter 17.124 (Design Provisions for Public Art). Environmental Assessment: Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. The project is for the subdivision of 1.93 acres into two parcels of land and the construction of 2 single-family residences in a residential zone. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed single-family residence will meet the City Council's core values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and relentless pursuit of improvement. The proposed project provides a well-designed single-family residence that will become a part of the existing neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 08, 2023, the property was posted on February 08, 2023, and notices were mailed to 69 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on February 07, 2023. No comments have been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments and Action Agenda dated November 1, 2022 Exhibit D - Trails Advisory Committee Comments and Action Agenda dated November 9, 2022 Exhibit E - Draft Resolution 23-02 of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297 Exhibit F - Draft Resolution 23-03 of Approval for Design Review DRC2020-00407 Exhibit G - Draft Resolution 23-04 of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2022-00340 Exhibit H - Conditions of Approval C S fD .. l S ' n Pro]ect Site - � s Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Exhibit INDEX MAP PARCEL MAP DRAWING INDEX ❑ SITE PLAN KEYNOTES W wo . - I p z Y Q PROPOSED SUBDIVISION . 4 ;S;",v ,,,,:8;, 5 1/2, S.W.I S W 1/4, Sac 23, T.1N, R 7W., S.R.H. 15011.1 Arco cucemange Io71 8 J LL O T _ fyppl CIVIL 1. PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW RETAINING WALL. SEE CIVIL PLANS. = J z w w w O ' °�` C-1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2. CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR CORRAL AREA = _ w Y Q m w v = z - _ T o l C) W z � � J co FOR APN# : 1074181020000 _ C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 3. 8" THICK 6'-0" CMU HIGH FENCE W/ CONCRETE MATCHING CAP z w = w cn Q m J p OL` ` ` """"""" C-3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 4. MONUMENT PLAQUE FOR THE AMERICAN FAMILY Q O z ~ 04:; ►' i+ o 1• _' e w. rr ' N11 � Q O 3 / r o 5. 16 FEET VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE ACCESS FOR FEEDER TRAIL O cn U Q w Q > 0 W = w O ~ . ® ® ® zzo � z � � = pz = � � - w ARCHITECTURAL 6. FRONT GATE - O z w Q O w w Q z 0 ~ ! • ,a -` �/ " a T-1.0 TITLE SHEET 7. A 4" THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) SURFACE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE HORSE Q Q } L p } ~ z Z z o z � w it s. .' _ ' I >- m = OwOpQHUU 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE . _' w T-1.1 FENCE RETAINING WALL PLAN TRAIL. A DRAINAGE V DITCH PARALLEL TO THE TRAIL WHERE NECESSARY FOR 0 � U 0 U - = w z /© , 77 Ww � w � cn � � wwp � w PROJECT SITE , ® /' ° A-1.0 FIRST SECOND FLOOR PLAN (LOT 1) ACCESS TO CORALS. c� Q `� w Q w LLJ w `1 0 � _ 2E / W WO W Z) W W (YUOU � PROJECT SITE _,,' ' o•n i ` A-2.1 ROOF PLAN _ ELEVATIONS (LOT 1) 8. 6-FOOT HIGH DECORATIVE BLOCK WALL = ��/1 f� = w X = f� w ( O 91737 � Or � vJ m W � 0 0 > Q m URANCHD CUCAI V 1DN A Yj 2 z 1 e «° A-2.2 ELEVATIONS (LOT 1) i ® i o r o A-3.0 FIRST J SECOND FLOOR PLAN (LOT 2) 4 �, � ,� .� -�. AS �`_ ,$� �'�«-_ /- T - T - A-3.1 ROOF PLAN _ ELEVATIONS (LOT 2) R 4Z. F.. .. _ • der--- - A-3.2 ELEVATIONS (LOT 2) CJ� Aoo seor'e Meop 171 C E = uF,ra.:a see e.,ee eme co«ew r1 GENERALNOTES - - - - - - SCOPE OF WORK � ❑ x C-23417 EXP.2-20-2 ti 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION 1. SUBDIVISION OF EXISTING SINGLE PARCEL INTO TWO FOR ALL PERSONS WORKING ON THE JOB. 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. PARCDESIGNLS.OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES OF APPROX. , , I CA 2 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LIEN RELEASES FOR ALL DESIGN6000- 7000 s❑. ❑/ DETACHED ADU I B LABOR AND MATERIALS PAID FOR PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE NEXTE INSTALLATION PAYMENT. STRUCTURES OF APPROX. 1,120 SQ. FT. I - - - O 4. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CODES, REGULATION AND % 4" E 340.00' 0PROJECT SUMMARY400, 6.od STANDARDS OF THE GOVERNING CITY, COUNTY AND STATE AGENCIES. 5. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE PREMIUM GRADE QUALITY THROUGHOUT. NO � �� ��■■� � m � O 'IAIIIIII�m SUBSTITUTION OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS ALLOWED WITHOUT CONSENT 'FROM THE ARCHITECT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION �: _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - co 6. INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. TO HOUSE A.P.N. # : 1074181020000 > SHALL BE BY CONTRACTOR. TRACT#: 10047 aI DRIVE�A❑ SUE SETBACK -- ---- --- I -- ---- --- ---1 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY ITEM I z E 10 FEET m° 1 DAMAGED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION BY HIS LOT#: 2FT 9 T w ZONING............. VL Q EMPLOYEES OR SUBCONTRACTORS. L❑ (;OVEREb AATIQ LOT SIZE: 1.68 ACRE 8. AFTER THE BUILDING INSPECTOR HAS SIGNED OFF ALL REQUIRED ❑ j C,OYE a j U) O INSPECTIONS AND ISSUED A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, AND ALL DENSITY ❑ I PATIO° I` V ITEMS FROM THE OWNER'S SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE PUNCH LIST 0 ARE COMPLETED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION, 10- OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY 2 DU/AC �❑ Ia rl� 2-CAR ° CONTRACT AMOUNT WILL BE HELD BY THE LENDING INSTITUTION OR LOT COVERAGE 0.25 > a,°°•I wiz GARAGE PARCEL a ,°FO°° °a' U FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.30 N Q ; r 1 OWNER FOR A LIEN WAIVER PERIOD OF 30 90 DAYS. ❑ Q m V Qcm 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE ENTIRE HOUSE m1D "� // ❑ W W PROFESSIONALLY CLEANED, INCLUDING WINDOWS INSIDE AND CODE ANALYSIS I� LOT 2 OUTSIDE, PRIOR TO OWNER MOVING IN. / 10. WHERE NO SPECIFIC DETAIL IS SHOWN, THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE U ,- APPLICABLE CODES o rn / z . SIMILAR TO THAT INDICATED OR NOTED FOR SIMILAR CONDITIONS. I I I : ° m / C6 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) PROPOSED 2-STORY -_ WHERE CONFLICTING MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS ARE CALLED OUT, 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE CMC N 1 w / ASSUME THE MORE EXPENSIVE CONDITION. NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ( ) o� SINGLE FAMILY 54 -6 z U ARCHITECT PRIOR TO WORK BEING STARTED. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC) {{ N RESIDENCE / � U Lj 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) `•.I 143'-10" 1 C� 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN DEMOLITION PERMIT PRIOR TO 1 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE CC DEMOLITION OF ANY WORK. ANY RECYCLABLE MATERIALS MUST BE CGBC c I 1 G 0 RECYCLED/REUSED AND PROOF OF RECYCLING (DUMP TICKETS, WOOD 2019 TITLE 24 ENERGY REGULATIONS m I HAUL-OFF RECEIPTS, ETC.)WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO 2019 UNIFORM FIRE CODE (UFC) A 2-CAR I R701 BUILDING FINAL. PROOF OF RECYCLING WILL NEED TO SHOW PROJECT 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC) ,� GARAGE ADDRESS, MATERIAL TO BE RECYCLED, VOLUME/WEIGHT OF RECYCLED I 1 MATERIAL AND RECYCLING LOCATION. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES �� CORRALz w co 12. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE SPRINKLER CONTROL BOX J AREA AND A 3" P.V.0 SWEEP "L" THROUGH THE FLOOR AND FOUNDATION OR I N 0 Co THROUGH THE WALL (VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ARCHITECT) FOR WIRES. 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR DRAINAGE. 13 I 1 �� �o J f-^ COORDINATE LOCATION OF BOX AND ELECTRICAL OUTLETS SHOWN ON 2. PLANS FOR PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL UNDER SEPARATE 40' --- ----0 - ------ --- SIDE SETBACK -- -- --------1 --------- J o v! PLANS WITH THE ARCHITECT. PERMIT. NOT PART OF THIS WORK. Q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J - 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER 3. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB CUT (IF APPLICABLE), CURB, w i FOR ANY CHANGE ORDER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE WORK IN AND APPROACH TO BE BUILT PER CITY STANDARDS. SEE ❑ - < 00 289. ' QUESTION. EXTRA WORK DONE WITHOUT AN APPROVED CHANGE GRADING PLANS. I ' EQUESTRIAN TRAIL ORDER IS NOT REIMBURSABLE. o'covaxAOE of00000 4. PROVIDE PROPER DRAINAGE WHERE ALL PAVERS ❑ DHc0'NW01ED GRANITE N 14. FORMS CF-6R-ENV_CF-6R-LTG❑CF-6R-MECH SHALL BE COMPLETED AND WILL BE INSTALLED. ❑ ❑ W . - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o O PRESENTED TO THE CITY FIELD INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL 5. FEEDER TRAIL OF A 16 FT VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE o - - - o = J INSPECTION SIGN OFF. ACCESS. REFER TO SHEET ❑ z SETBACK °O (� LLI �/ LI E 15 FEET --------------. Q � I- ---------- ❑ Z1 N 4' M ZI ❑ N RESIDENTIAL AREA TABULATION ; W1 LuTt- I CO AREA m DI w 3 "1 '0 ' HARDSCAPE AT �1 p Q LOT COVERAGE (SF) PROP. MAX. 8 NO. FLOOR AREA. R.B.A. HT HT FRONT YARD 1 ` a 25❑ MAX. PROP. 50❑ MAX. PROP. FIRST FLOOR 3467.0 - - �� � - . . ° ° LOT 1 703E o SECOND FLOOR 3569.0 1 PROPOSED 2-STORY �\D 8951 5,691.7 30'-0" 30 FT. 50% 34.6% z° SINGLE FAMILY o GARAGE - 6 CAR 1265.0 1265.0 : �.'w- °° a°�• \ I 15.8% RESIDENCE ENTRY PORCH 135.0 135.0 \\ ❑ / Y LOT 1 COVERED PATIO #1 162 162 // __ _ w COVERED PATIO #2 622.7 622.7 „ �/<\ o v i LU 6-CAR GARAGE �\ D z (TANDEM) / \ j LU N Q N FIRST FLOOR 3489.5 6871.E 7�-11 ^ / I I � 1 0 I ot n 1 ❑ - - _ O SECOND FLOOR 3382.1 __ mz- _ �❑ - z a <c14 a a a GARAGE - 2 CAR 484 484 8948.5 6,293.7 30'-0" 30 FT. 50% 48.9% I BEET - ❑ - -- II z LOT 2 GARAGE - 2 CAR 484 484 17.5% J ENTRY PORCH 99.E 99.E � � 50.0 ' Lu ti COVERED PATIO 91.2 91.2 ��, ❑ COVERED PATIO 1045.4 1045.4 p Lu o Q RV PARKING 600 600 I I I I III cn O o w I I I U) � ° m � o0 NOTE: CURBS AND GUTTERS MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE o n CD m II 0 REMOVED AND REPLACED PER CITY STANDARDS. _j w a o Z U) c o = C� O LU Q = LOT AREA TABULATION EXISTING ❑ PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR CMU FENCE ❑ RETAINING WALL SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 1 ? w LU ° p o < J - ALL Q � � GROSS AREA PROP. NET MINI LOT MIN. WIDTH PROP. MIN. PROP. ❑ LEGEND o w o 0 N #. SQ.FT. AREA SIZE REQUIRED WIDTH DEPTH DEPTH SQ.FT. SQ.FT. REQUIRED PROJECT NO. EXISTING CONCRETE FIRE - -R - - - -R PROPERTY LINE ICI W WATER LOT 1 35810 35804 20,000 90, 121'-9" 200' 290' STRUCTURE TURNAROUND WALKWAY 2021-21 LOT 2 35794 35788 20,000 90' 125'- 4" 200' 290' PROPOSED W W W W W W W. BUILDING SETBACK S S SEWER DWG. NO. REVISION NO. STRUCTURE W W W W LANDSCAPE DEDICATED LAND -� - - -� CENTER LINE T- 1 . 0 Exhibit � a� w0Y z H APN: 1074-181 -03-0-000 Mi L W Q '> '> z w m W } LJ � N® REBAR PLACEMENT a0a01-- li r = OwzI- _ - � I- Q � - WU c � Z W � � M W ~ H0Qmm00LL A W -) < O � � O w ILLUSTRATION FOOTING OPTION B (D V) = > Z = � = 0 z ow VLR B wz z_ zzUQOvwOQ � � 15 19 19 ZONE wm 2Q } = o = z a � uo � z x � w w § O Q w Q w w w w z U O W 2 } - z z0 o � ILw � �Lu Q� LLJO Lu Ow (DH W cn Of N 89-CD -39'14" E 15 340.00 cnUaQ � WQIll WEv0 = 2 — - - 5 .00' - - E �E �.�� �' o m m m = a ° = wX = � � w � ° moo �F E �■g 1 (TYPICAL) � m0amwXmoao > omQU I $ ^ I. - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - ALL REBAR SPLICES _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 24" MIN. OVERLAP '4I 12 17 z m. PROPERTY C> d LINE ,�' C-23417 6QVERED•PATIOS,. 1 EXP.2-20-2 d • D :I 796,00 e °" L L CUT . . °F CAL > o PARCEL2 Q: C > FS 796.20 3 STEPS—, — _ I-I ° a 1 E 27.5 FF=797.7� O CDPAD=797.03 > LIMITS OF O } � CUT O PROPOSED 2-STORY GRADING N WM N SINGLE FAMILY co 00 RESIDENCE Lo°jr N N (TYPICAL) ONLY CELLS AND BOND BEAM v 6 C n N O I LIMITS OF COURSES WITH REBAR TO BE 36' 5' � � GRADING VLR ^, 4 v A I �Rour�D Q y � � ZONE (DO NOT SOLID C5RbU7 ENTIRE WALL-USE p W GROUT STOP MESH AS APPROPRIATE) U °' 12 5 STEPS UP FILL Q c: 1781.12 cn I 1 O FL/INV II U 6"S- CUTCD — — 13 �� — — — — QO FOOTING OPTION A W U (n o (TYPICAL) _ -o I18 � ALL REBAR SHALL HAVE A �_ O U . . - - - - - - - - — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - N MINIMUM OF I al . � = z .- 289.91 16 I 16 old / I COVER AT FOOTINGS D 0) �_ 16 _ E ZU / DESIGN PARAMETERS: (� w rn> N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - K N ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE(PSF) 30 CD I I CD D CF ILLLT CDPASSIVE SOIL BEARING(PSF) =1 50 CD1 Z COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION =0.25 �J ALLOWAHL-E SOIL BEARING(PSF) m 1 500 LIMITS OF 15 5' WIND=80 MPH,EXPOSURE C SEISMIC: 12 CUL, GRADING NA=1.3,Nv=1.6,Z=0.4,SOIL PROFILE=SD � 15 Q j L Q � 0 UD a PROPOSED 2-STORY ° 15 0 C`7 SINGLE FAMILY 15 FREESTANDING BLOCK WALL DETAIL J U) o RESIDENCE J ` �. 2 6 P�F 'E 1 Lu o w w z D ' z w 10 >°- " / LIMITS OF 1 O (� w o WM / GRADING p I:: > a CUT o 0, /� = p 11 FF=788.00 : b �/ FOOTING OPTION "A" FOOTING OPTION "B" M W N 1 °p l PAD=7 8 7.3 3 j: °: _ _ 0 inF N O II / ' _ _ � w Q 8 STEPS UP �, / I #A HORIZONTAL REBAR p Or-¢ a� /% (USE BOND BEAM BLOCK) a co co / / PROPERTY LINE 3 . • �. ..I° D I LIMITS OF /// 6" OR 8" BLOCK GRADING / H" "H„ 1771.50 ,'I / 1 HEIGHT FROM TOP #4 HORIZONTAL AT 32"MAX.O.C. HEIGHT FROM TOP FL/INV 6"S FILL I 18 / 1 OF FOOTING (USE BOND BEAM BLOCK) o�>aoTlNa 1 I I SEE TABLE"A" SEE TABLE"B" J 1 i FOR REBAR SIZE FOR REBAR SIZE I` CUT o r AND SPACING AND SPACING ;-H 1 o I I I (LOCATE REBAR IN CENTER OF CELL) (LOCATE REBAR IN CENTER OF CELL) rFINISH GRADE (1)_44 REBAR / - - CONTINUOUS sill- - - _ — — o 290.00 � III II (2}-#q.REBAR w i 50.00 12" 10" _ 12" N89 39 14 E 340.00 III— CONTINUOUS 10" _ — --- - _(III illlilll _ o U — —— _ __ — — — — I REVERSE _ _ _(III=1111 Q DIRECTION OF W" „w" W _..I O5 II II I HOOK ON EVERY (FI I (F IN OOTING WIDTH) OOTG WIDTH) >L OTHER REBAR I- L I SEE TABLE"A" SEE TABLE"B" Qf w VLR �O w I ALL FOOTINGS ADJACENT TO w CN O w B w I I TABLE ..A„ SLOPES TO BE AT LEAST 5'TO TABLE „B„ ~ CN DAYLIGHT AS SHOWN REL.OW. Q FENCE AND WALL SITE PLAN— LOT 1 AND 2 1 VERTICAL VERTICAL �� - � �� „H„ ��W„ REINFORCEMENT ��H" ��W" REINFORCEMENT SCALE: 1 - 20-0 3' 0" #4 @ 48" O.C. 3' ]9" #4 @ 48" O.C. a a a a a HATCH LEGEND 4' 20" #4 @ 48"O.C. �; 4' 22" #4 @ 48"O.C. KEYNOTES 5' 23" #4 @ 48" O.C. s< � oA� 5 29 Ca 48" O.C. 6' 29" 1 #4 @ 24"O.C. eoo oM 5'MIN. 6' 1 34" 1 #4 @ 24"O.C. REMOVE & REPLACE FOOTING AC PAVING & BASE 1-SAWCUT AND REMOVE EX. AC PAVING AND BASE 2�CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVING AND BASE NOTES: I� M NEW AC PAVEMENT 3o-CONSTRUCT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD 1)THIS DESIGN DOES NOT ALLOW GRADE DIFFERENTIALS OF Z I` MORE THAN 6"ON OPPOSING SIDES OF THE WALL. THIS IS THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED, Q o Q 4�CONSTRUCT NEW CURB & GUTTER PER CITY STANDARDS NOTA RETAINING WALL. U 0 2)FENCE HEIGHTS ARE REGULATED-CONSULT ZONING 1)FOOTING;EXCAVATION TRENCH CLEAN WITH W BRICK PAVED �CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN OUTLET PER CITY STD. REGULATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. STEEL IN PLACE AND SUPPORTED 3"ABOVE AND o Lu 0 DRIVEWAY SLAB 3)NO WATER COURSE OR NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL BE AWAY FROM THE SURROUNDING EARTH/DIRT. U) ' > Z 6�CONSTRUCT 1 WATER METER AND METER BOX w o OBSTRUCTED. 2)REBAR/PRE-GROUT;BOND BEAM RFRAR AND J > T- Q O CONSTRUCT 6" PVC SEWER LATERAL 4)GROUT ONLY THE CELLS CONTAINING REBAR. THIS WALL VERTICAL REBAR IN PLACE-INSPECTION PRIOR 7O Q j Q CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT DESIGNED FOR ALL CELLS TO BE GROUTED. PLACING GROUT. > Qm V g REMOVE EXISTING TREES 5)ALL REBAR TO BE ASTM SPEC.A61 5,GRADE 40 MINIMUM. 3)FINAL;AFTER GROUT IS PLACED•PRIOR TO ANY > 0 _ 6)ALL REBAR LAP SPLICES TO BE 24"MINIMUM, DECORATIVE CAP PLACEMENT. w 0 2 C) g�REMOVE EXISTING IRRIGATION METER J Z w z co (� GRAVEL 10 REMOVE EXISTING SIGNS 8)ALLMASONRY BECUNITS TbBE ASTM MASONR CELLS. N. �_ W w 0 Q Lu < O S)REBAR TO BE CENTERED IN MASONRY CELLS. � 11 REMOVE EXISTING MAIL BOX _ a'SEE PAGE 2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION' z Z � � O 0 � Q °o°o°o°o°o°o° 12 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD < w I.- w Q °°°°°°°°°°°°° DECOMPOSED GRANITE DISCLAIMER: Q m m °°°°°°°°°°°°° 13 INSTALL LED STREET LIGHTS PER SCE's LIGHTING STANDARDS ALTERNATE DESIGNS MAY BE POSSIBLE 0 O O WHEN PROVIDED WITH AN ENGINEERED ANALYSIS. USE OF THIS STANDARD DESIGN ��i/��i/��i/��i/��i 15 CONSTRUCT 4 MAX. HIGH BLOCK RETAINING WALL is AT THE USER'S RISK AND CARRIES NO PROJECT NO. ��/��/��/��/��/ EARTH FILL OR CUT » IMPLIED OR INFERRED GUARANTEE AGAINST 16 CONSTRUCT 4 THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE IN EQUASTRIAN TRAII FAILURE OR DEFECTS. 2021-21 17 CONSTRUCT BRICK PAVED DRIVEWAY PER ARCHITECT'S PLAN DWG. NO. REVISION NO. BLK & RET/WALLS 18 CONSTRUCT 10' X 20' X 12" DEEP GRAVEL PIT 1g PROTECT IN PLACE EX. BLOCK RETAINING WALL 3 MASONRY FENCE BLOCKWALL DETAIL T- 1 . 1 20 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE DOWN DRAIN NOTE: ALL WALLS WITH BE TAN SLUMP STONE. W NOTE: ALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS TO BE 4' MAX. HEIGHT W o Y z Y OzO = z fY IJO � pWQ WO O — = J � � z Wmw WWI ow = w � � cvi� Qm °JpQ Q QQ (n < o p J = O J H W � zOW � JW � Q O zzzUQ � v � OQ � fY W z } 'LD � Q Q (n U Z U 0 B p U U p m U W O p a = W Z W W Q LU w W QZ WZIi = U ~ 2 211fy- 2W X22i of - IYfYO I I H (nllHm W Hpflp > pmQU — — — — — PROP. 4' MAX HIGH BLK/RE/WALL AND 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL EX. 4' HIGH FEN E EX. 4' HIGH FENCE ��,D ARCS X. 1' TO 3' HIGH BLK/RET/WALL LIAI INCAI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,a xi C-2 417 20— �e EXP.2-20-2 m m W y y 04�~ PROPERTYT7 .� W I LINE OF CAL Wy I WWW L J ++ + + + �Z E • f �� O W y wco W W WWWW : : LOT 2 yWWI WWWW � W . . :+I U) QWWWI WWWW Q O WWWI I WWWW # + + + + WW W W Q yW yWcW ( o w~ W W nY y I W W W REFER SHEET F-1 I W W W W FOR FENCE DETAIL WWWI I WWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W ' 4 � 0 � WWWI I W WWWwWWWWWyWW� WWWWW ' V 13 I I WWWWWWWWWWWWWW� W � � C RRALA/EA CORRAL AREA � z W /I rGINEERIN,(7 GATE TO B I W W W W W U r�, IGN�D PER I y y W 16L 1 6� 6' U LJJ STA DARD ING 1006-B W — W I 5 FOOTING OPTION"A" FOOTING OPTION"B" y I REBAR PLACEMENT y yl I tal Gat 6/- Q ILLUSTRATION FOOTING OPTION $4 HORIZONTAL REBAR (USE BOND BEAM BLOCK) Lyj o I + + + + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = J J �4 6"OR B"BLOCK WWWI I + + + + . . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ¢ J �y Nn Q W co W + + + + +t. . .++ + + + + + + + + + _ O RAL AREA Q (TYPICAL) HEIGHT FROM TOP #4 HORIZONTAL AT 32"MAX.O.G. HEIGHTFROM TOP + + + + + + + + + + CORRAL AREA .. + + + + + + + + + + of Ivc (USE BOND BEAM BLOCK) OF Nc y W W l I 2' ALL REBAR SPLICES Foon Fo°D — + + + + + ++ + + +++++ I '24 MIN. OVERLAP SEE TABLE SEETABLE"B" co J Z = 'J ( +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a Z FOR REUAR SIZE FOR REBAR SIZE ///��� ++�++ ++I++ I — = AND SPACING ANO SPACING �/ ' 11 �I Q aa�AND PACI„C.cEI�+ u.a,�,EA E �H c.�.oFca� � _j v' � W W +�,+ IrA I HIGH AFINISH GRADE W WI I I'+ +I+ (1)-#4 REBAR - - W RETAI ING W L ONTINURUS W W W I t2' 10" — — I` I CONTINUOUS RU US t2' + . } — IAlllll CONTINUOUS I�pIIII — to +I+ a _ W + + tlj 20 -2 RETAINING WALL (8' RF FRSF - -mull y y l I DIRECTION OF II�' "w "W Hoorc DN EYERr (FI OOT1NGWID (�TINGWI I HIGH WALL) OTHER REBAR O . ++ ++ SEE TABLE"A' SEETABLE'B' + ++ ALL FDOTlNG5 ADJACENTTO T 1 SLOPES TO BE AT LEAST 5'TO J W L O T 1 I TABLE TABLE"B" W W + + + + + + + + + + + AYLIGHT AS SHOWN BELOW. + + + + + YERTIEAL VERTICAL Lu + + + + + + + REINFORCEMENT RElNPORGEMENT + 3` 17" #4 @ 48"O.C.O C 3' 19" #4 @ 48"O C + + + + + + +++�+� 4 MAX 4' 20" #4 @ 48"O.G. �. 4' 22" #4 @ 48"O.C. W + + + + + c I� w +++++++++++++++++++ 7 I I HIGH ONLY CELLS I A 5' 23" #4 @ 48"O.C. HGr.o 5' 29 #4 @ 48"O.C. • W W W W ++++ SAND BOND BEAM , 6' + + 0 + / / / 6' 29" #4 @ 24"O.C. s MIH. W I � BLK/R E/WALL COURSES WITH REBAR TO BE FOORN° / GROUTED (DO NOT SOLI❑GROUT FNTLFE WALL-USE NOTES: I I AND 6' HIGH GROUT STOP MESH AS APPROPR;ATFJ 1)THIS DESIGN DOES NOT ALLOW GRADE DIFFERENTIALS OF MORE THAN 6"ON OPPOSING SIDES OF THE WALL.THIS IS THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS ARE RE LURED. BLOCKWALL NOT A RETAINING WALL. Q + + / 2)FENCE HEIGHTS ARE REGULATED-CON51JLT2ONING 1)FOOTING'EXCAVATION TRENCH CLEAN WITH REGULATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. STEEL IN PLACE AND SUPPORYED 3"ABOVE AND NO WATER COURSE OR NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL BE AWAY FROM THE SURROUNDING EARTH/DIRT. / FOOTING OPTION A OBSTRUCTED. 2)REBAR/PRE�RO LIT:BOND REAM REBAR AND W fTYPICAU 4)GROUT ONLY THE CELLS CONTAINING REBAR.THiSWALL VERTICAL REBAAINPLACE•INSPECTION PRIOR TO Z ALL REBAR SHALL HAVE A IS NOT DESIGNED FOR ALL CELLS TORE GROUTED. PL4CING GROLfI'. W MINIMUM OF 3"CONCRETE S ASTMsp BE AG 7 n 5.GRADE MINIMUM. 3)FI�IAFTERGROUTiSPLAGED-PRIORTOANY 6)ALL REBAR LAP ••I I / // J DECORATIVE CAP PLACEMENT. COVER AT FOOTINGS 7)ALL MASONRY UNITS TO BE A57M C-90 GRADE N. / V B)REBARTO BE CENTERED IN MASONRY CELLS. • / / � ' � DESIGN PARAMETERS: ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE(PSF) =30 'SEE PAGE 2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMArON' PASSIVE SOIL BEARING(PSF) -150 COEFFICIENTOF FRICTION =o.zs DISCLAIMER: (p I ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING fP5F1 =1500 ALTERNATE DESIGNS MAY BE POSSIBLE WIND=80 MPH,EXPOSURE WHEN PROVIDED WITH AN ENGINEERED x SEISMIC: LU NA=1.3,Nv=1.6,Z=0,4.SOIL PROFILE=SD ANALYSIS. USE S RISK STANDARD DESIGN Y — / IS AT THE USER'S RISK AND CARRIES N — i IMPLIED DR INFERRED GUARANTEE AGAINST U C r FAILURE OR DEFECTS. w ' I C NCE III p U sommommow- w _ - - 11 NOTE: TYPICAL DETAIL REFER g PROP. 4' MAX HIGH BLK/RE/WALL AND 6' HIGH PROP. 4' MAX HIGH BLK/RE/WALLAND 6' HIGH II GRADING PLAN FOR HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ` ' of BLOCKWALL BLOCKWALL —__ ___ ____ _ — — II - 5 w CMU WALL DETAIL TYPICAL o PROPOSED FENCE PLAN FOR LOT 1 AND LOT 2 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" OPENING WIDTH 3 INCH 3 INCH aaaaa (TYP) (TYP) 16'-01 8 -011 81-011 MHHHHH z" _ I J z o U cy) I I I II a OoLu co w � COLUMN I = i ►� m co o � 0 0 1 w � U DECORATIVE BL CK WALL ' I ° Q w Q (D z Q � o o � < I II 90 PERCENT � � Q I III i\ / VIEW o w 0 0 N� �\ ��� OBSCURING - - - - (TYP) PROJECT NO. 4/— - - - METAL 2021-21 1 BACKING DWG. NO. REVISION NO. F- 1 CMU WALL AT EQUESTRIAN PATH 2 NOT USED 3 TYPICAL HORSE TRAIL GATE -'-FOR REFERNCE 6 FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES ,� o Y = Y z 0Z Q w 0 1. PROVIDE A 3.5 INCH CLEAN OUT BASED ON 4 INCH SOIL PIPE 18 INCHES FROM I ql�� f 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 w Q Z w m O W } FOUNDATION AND EXTEND ABOVE GRADE CPC 2016 SECTION 707.10 AND 719.3. I ❑ ❑❑ 79'-0• ❑❑ ❑ o `� U) w z Q v m Q BE SINGLE I I I I I I I z W m W ~ Q m 2 NOT TO EXCEED. ALL WATER S1E28 GALTS TO LONS PERF INSTALLED SH�CPIC 201RE o SECTION 408.0 FLUSH TOILETS z'-o" z'-o" 3'-0° 16'-0" 4'-0" 12'-8" a'-0' 16'-0" z'-0" 15'-0" Q o o W 0 of J w O Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 c) Q 3. ALL SHOWER HEADS TO BE INSTALLED SHALL BE DESIGNED NOT TO EXCEED I 2' 2' 79 0° z z o z ww _ >O Z = p w �` f r` f _ z � < o 'w Qom } A WATER SUPPLY RATE OF 2.0 GALLONS PER MINUTE CPC 2013 SECTION 402.0. I ' ' o Q w Q w W U) z c� 0 0- 2 2'-0" 2'-0" T-0" 16'-0" 4'-0" 12'-8" 4'-0" 16'-0" 2'_0 15'_0" Q H Z } Z U Z Q Z H H W 4. CLIMATE CONTROL FOR THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION AREA'S I _ _ _ _ _ _ o v � 0 o M m o w o o d = w z z z' w � w w w tw CONDITION HABITABLE SPACE BY SHOWING ALL HVAC SUPPLY/RETURN AIR A - i 1'` 7 �' I COw v Q � w Q w uj w " v _ REGISTERS LOCATIONS. I L w o w c� w w E O c) = 0- w = wx = � of- I w0 5. PROVIDE COVERING OF DUCT OPENINGS AND PROTECTION OF MECHANICAL COVERED COVERED COVERED cn 0 m w o 0- o > o m a 0 I I I A EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION. o I PATIO PATIO#2 PATIO 6. SHOWER COMPARTMENTS AND WALLS ABOVE BATHTUB WITH SHOWER HEADS I FiP �,D ARC 1 SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A SMOOTH, NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE TO A HEIGHT BALCONY BALCONY t OF NOT LESS THAN 6'-0"AFF. I FR-0.08' ml FF-0.08'-0.1T o 7. PROVIDE 2"GAS STUB-OUT @ COVERED PATIO ROOF FOR PATIO HEATERS B j UP UP F/P a (VERIFY LOCATION W/OWNER). _ -I - IN1oW C-234178. PROVIDE NEW DUCTING AND VENT TO THE NEW FAMILY ROOM. " IF +7 FF:-208' EXP.2-20-2 9. ALL HABITABLE STRUCTURES MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC NATURALDINING UP UP GAS SEISMIC SHUT-OFF VALVE. I LIVING ROOM B - - - - - 10. ALL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD.U.N.O. j ❑ ❑ FF-11 _ _ _rl C3_ of CAL 11. WINDOWS LOCATED a FRAMED OPENINGS SHALL BE CENTERED ON OPENING LL a C ❑ U.N.O. I > BATH (Co 12. PROVIDE EMERGENCY EXIT DOOR OR WINDOW FROM ALL SLEEPING ROOMS I a + + 3 OWITH A NET CLEAR WINDOW OPENING AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 5.7 SQ.FT.(821 o + ala. > . . . -§ � MASTER � } { V SQ.IN.)MIN.NET WINDOW OPENING HEIGHT DIM 24 CLEAR:vIIN NET OPENING I � U 0 � ;� � -3- WIDTH DIM 20"CLEAR. FINISH SILL HEIGHT MAXIMUM 44"ABOVE THE FLOOR I FAMILY ROOM BEDROOMIT 1TV W Q IC (UBC SECTION R310.2.1 a R310.2.2). i ❑ LOFT ❑ BED#ROOM #3 0 13. AT SHOWERS u TUB/SHOWERS COMBO ALL WALL COWERING SHALL BE - - - - ❑ E]CEMENT PLASTER,TILE OR APPROVED EQUAL TO 70"MIN ABOVE DRAIN AT _- SHOWER OR TUB W/SHOWER(CRC R 307.2). I HALLWAY 14. ALL WATER CLOSET TO BE INSTALLED REQUIRE TO BE SINGLE FLASH TOILETS ET ❑ ❑ NOT TO EXCEED 1.28 GALLONS PER FLASH CPC 2016 SECTION 403.2.1. I STUDY �--+ 15. A NON SLIP-JOINT TRAP WILL BE AT ALL BATHTUB FIXTURES. I uP uP /LIBRARY ,��' � GALLERY � O 16. AN EARTHQUAKE-ACTUATED GAS SHUT-OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL i BAR A �Q DE MASTER NEW GAS SERVICES AND METERS. o wlc 17. HPROVIDED U SHOWERS a SHOWER-TUB COMBOS SHALL BE W/INDIVIDUAL CONTROL VALVES OF PRESSURE BALANCE a THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE I ❑ ❑ DN DN BEDROOM O� v TYPE. I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E #4 18. WATER HEATER u TEMPERATURE RELIEF DRAIN LINE NEEDS TO TERMINATE + Q �_ TO OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. I I WIC W U cn o / 19. CLOTHES DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE o I ❑ ISLAND REF #2 MASTER wlc ^� _0 BUILDING AND HAVE A BACK-DRAFT DAMPER. EXHAUST DUST IS LIMITED TO 14' I ❑ REF FOI1'ER BEDROOM BATHROOM#2 1 + O Ad WITH TWO ELBOWS.THIS SHALL BE REDUCED 2'FOR EVERY ELBOW IN EXCESS I o A�O 7OF TWO. MINIMUM 4"DIAMETER,SMOOTH, METAL DUCT ROUTE ON PLAN. -- KITCHEN z UP I UP TV o VANITYIC 7 20. FIRE BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED AT 10'INTERVALS(HORIZONTAL AND FF: .00' v E VERTICAL), ENCLOSED AND CONCEALED SPACES,AND AT OPENINGS AROUND -I o00 w VF4 Tue (, W VENTS,PIPES,DUCTS,AT STAIR STRINGERS AND SIMILAR PLACES AT CEILING ° L ° o UPI UP UP AND FLOOR LEVELS. F I 0 HALL Iv BEDROOM FF:- 08'21. ALL BEDROOMS REQUIRE AND ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY ARC-FAULT CIRCUIT I BUTLER'S KITCHEN HALL UP SHOWER OPEN TO #5 n INTERRUPTER CIRCUIT BREAKERS. , !L /PANTRY P TR F o BELOW 22. PROVIDE A 3.5 INCH CLEAN OUT BASED ON 4 INCH SOIL PIPE 18 INCHES FROM G� - 1P UP --e-- - -----LD ------ C FOUNDATION AND EXTEND ABOVE GRADE CPC 2016 SECTION 707.10 AND 719.3. M I ENTTY 0 O7 23. SHOWERHEADS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 2.0 I a POROH LAUNDRY o 10 < w (� GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 80 PSI.SHOWERHEADS SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO BE I UP - o ❑ 3: 1 FF:-0. 8'-0.17 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THE U.S. Fi O a T a I 0 C'7 24. CLIMATE CONTROL FOR THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION AREAS - I iF1 I co 'l CONDITION HABITABLE SPACE BY SHOWING ALL HVAC SUPPLY/RETURN AIR I --4 ®p ®Q a �Q I Q � 0) REGISTERS LOCATIONS. UP H I I w Ln cq - I I >_ a� ----� GYM i Tv ------� I I J I 6-CAR I ROOF OVER I � w GARAGE a FF:-aso' GARAGE _j I V I s I m L I UP I DN ENTERTAINMENT ROOM Iz a 0 1 -I VERED POATO#11 I ❑ of N UP o UNCOVERED DECK I i 1 1 ti I zo YID Y N QIL 1 - - - - - w- - - - - - - - - - - - w lin CONCRETE w l w DRIVEWAY U D z Lu �IJ U) Q I T a I _FRONT SET AC4�-- ----- ---------------------------- - wo ------t------------------------- LINE 42' FE E T H X I X I I z N co It Lf) I I � FIRST FLOOR PLAN scALE. 1is" = 1'-0" 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN sCALE: 1is" = 1'-0" 2cn co o ❑ FLOOR PLANS KEYNOTES LEGEND Q z o Q CDw c� LOT COVERAGE - 5113 SQ.FT. (ALLOWABLE MAX - 5713 SQ.FT.) cD o > � Q o O 00 o � J 0 U) o m ? 1-ST FLOOR HABITABLE AREA - 3467 SQ.FT. w - o o � = U 6-CAR GARAGE -1265 SQ.FT. I m o o 0- w Q o ENTRY PORCH - 132 SQ.FT. z o -1 ° o o � z COVERED PATIO #1 - 162 SQ.FT. 3:. o m 0- u- Q � IY COVERED PATIO #2 - 623 SQ.FT. Q J a o co 0 2-ND FLOOR HABITABLE AREA - 3116 SQ.FT. PROJECT NO. 2021-21 TOTAL HABITABLE AREA - 6583 SQ.FT. (MAX - 6855 SQ.FT.) DWG. NO. REVISION NO. A- 1 . 0 Lu ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - "FRENCH COLONIAL" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 ° � __ Q u o ELEVATIONS KEYNOTES W om- �W W 2 _ W Y Q m W U = z z w > m W u) Q m Co H O Q 1 . CLASS "A" LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE TILE, MODEL - EFFICIENT GLAZING. z z o I z � 10 = o Z = _ ° z BEL AIR,4883 HILLSBOROUGH BLEND, < ° Q w a a w W z o CRRC:0918-0098, MANUFACTURE - "EAGLELITE". 9. 4-SECTIONAL OVERHEAD WOOD GARAGE DOOR WITH j o o m o w o w = w z AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL DOOR OPENING AND I w � a u a_ a z w z 2. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SUN-BURST WINDOW TOP, MANUFACTURER: WAYNE mjo = w = w X m 2 w w ui ° o NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS GALVANIZED DALTON SERIES 7100 (COLOR -GRAY). I TYP. cn m W o o > o m a IRON (OR SIMILAR) AND BE COLORED TO MATCH 30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE MAX ALLOWED HEIGHT ROOFS TILE. 10. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE. NjJ -� ARC - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. "LA HABRA" STUCCO SANTA BARBARA, COLOR -X-23 11 . 3'-6" HIGH DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON GUARD RAIL _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ASPEN, BASE 200. FINISHED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. I x C-23417 y - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. DECORATIVE SIDING, TEXTURE - TRADITIONAL LAP, 12. DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON FALSE BALCONY - — — — T — — — — — — — — — — — — COLOR - "FLAGSTONE", MANUFACTURER - ALLURA��. RAILING FINISHED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. I of CALF I 5. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE FIBERGLASS FOAM 13. CAST STONE WINDOW AND DOOR SURROUNDS. 2o'-a" TOP of PLATE -- — ---- MOLDING FINISHED WITH MATCHING, COLOR - 18'-0" TOP OF HEADER — L — — _ _ _ _ — — — _ _ _ — TYP_ — — — — _ — — — — — — — — — — E "CREAM WAVE CRACKER" DE 6198 RL#512, LRV 67. — — — — — ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ as ❑❑ ❑� ❑❑ ❑❑❑ 5 6. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE WOOD COLUMN & q I TYP. ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ O ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ DETAILS, COLOR - "CREAM WAVE CRACKER", DE 6198 3 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ T ❑�❑jII R 5 2, R 6 15'-0" 6'-0° 11 ❑❑11'-0" FINISH FLOOR ❑ >% ❑❑ ❑ 7. DECORATIVE STONE VENEER ELDORADO BRICK.® - - — - - - - - — — — — — — — — 0L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TUNDRABRICK 10'-0" TOP of PLATE }, O � 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER. V 8. "JELD-WEN" WINDOWS WITH GRID. ALL WINDOWS Q ti ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ a❑ ❑� SHALL BE DUAL GLAZED WITH LOW E ENERGY ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 1 � � O O U g ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ v Q ❑❑ I ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ 8 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ P. ❑❑ ❑❑ MOOD 000000 U ±0.00 FINISH FLOOR h �� T -3" F.G. ui � •� F- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ❑ - - - - - - Q F I FRONT WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 V z w � 8 0M I I 13 1211 10 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 J U) � w L' ~ > 6 \Q O � m T Q Io oI I Wc:) rm r_ ml I rn (o W TOP OF ROOF I --- - - - - - - - - - - - 41 of> MAX ALLOWED HEIGHT o I -�30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE I RIDGE — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - i — - - - 7_1" TOP OF GABLE I I I I —$26'-3" TOP OF CHIMNEY 25'-10" TOP OF GABLE — — — — — 24'-4" TOP OF GABLE j - - - - - - - - - - - — I I I I I 20'-0" TOP OF PLATE I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - 19'-0" TOP OF HEADER j I ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ o :12Lu 4:1� I i �o ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ I _ o I 0 z- - - - - - - I I I W D Q 4:12> I I I- - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - L — - - �_ J \ I I 11'-O" FINISH FLOOR I _ a I — - - — — - - - - - - - - - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — , 10'-0" TOP OF PLATE ------------ ----------- ------------ 6'-0" 15'-0" y�A I fi j LJJ X 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER 42 W 42 I 8,_ „ t t❑ 0 x N M 1r❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ::]El ::]El ::]El ❑ ❑❑ z ROOF OVER I I ❑❑ �� 4 ❑❑ ❑❑ � 0� ❑❑ ❑❑ �� ❑❑ �\Q yiA I I GARAGE CD I I ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ I i [:11:1 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 1 = - F — - - L 4:12 4 I o o U zCD > co z \Q I n _ n Zw co J REAR (EAST) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16 1 -0 3 0 o J co J 5 Z o lt = V � m < U) z � � o zoo ° o oco < § O 0 IZ LL Q 1n � — — — — — — — — — — < Jco 0 O O PROJECT NO. 2021-21 DWG. NO. REVISION NO. A- 1 . 1 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 N M L G F E D C B ALu Wo } = Y O O o W Q O 0 LL 2 � = = J Z W m w W W CCH- WYQJ ~ WU = Z Z Q(n0001 O O W nQOQpw � -J,L>U - U Zzo00 = 2pz = wmgw Z U < 6 F Q [ � QO < H- Z ¢ H- wz0oz6ZoH- w W _ aU 0WOpWHZo � ov w W w W W O W n Z = cZ L� WQ W W U O U30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE O W � U W W 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HCnW > DoOQU 12 4� QED ARCS 24'-4" TOP OF GABLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "1q��I r��C1 fi x 23'-4" TOP OF GABLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C-23417 � EXP.2-20-2 O 20'-0" TOP OF PLATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CALF 18'-0" TOP OF HEADER ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ — — — p 17'-3" TOP OF GARAGE ,,, uuu - - - - - - -❑ - - ❑- U El 11171 ❑ ❑ IIII II II ❑❑ O 11'-O" FINISH FLOOR fi 0'-0" TOP OF PLATE ^\ 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER _ � � a�-+ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ _ _) ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ Q U LEJ�El LEI[Ell Ll LILI I LIL. 111T==�ill I I I I cy) u u f0.00 FINISH FLOOR _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - -3" F.G. O = Z z U = E 0 � Uw RIGHT (SOUTH ) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" 1 Q V rn w m ❑ 0 co J U 0� 0-) � w Lo > o E2- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE J 0 M � 12 4F_— _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 9)24'-4" TOP OF GABLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21'-0" TOP OF PLATE w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19'-0" TOP OF HEADER ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ I II I E Y U w 2 p U 9) 11'-O" FINISH FLOOR W Z 10'-0" TOP OF PLATE Q U) a - - - - - - - 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ Q X Z t0.00 FINISH FLOOR -3" F.G. ti co ti O� LEFT (NORTH ) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" 2 o Q oz CD U Oh 00 o > z m ❑ ELEVATIONS KEYNOTES � p 0 z 1 . CLASS A LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE TILE, MODEL - 5. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE FIBERGLASS FOAM 9. 4-SECTIONAL OVERHEAD WOOD GARAGE DOOR WITH p co ~o m 0 BEL AIR,4883 HILLSBOROUGH BLEND, MOLDING FINISHED WITH MATCHING, COLOR - AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL DOOR OPENING AND J _j Z o It = U CRRC:0918-0098, MANUFACTURE - "EAGLELITE". "CREAM WAVE CRACKER" DE 6198 RL#512, LRV 67. SUN-BURST WINDOW TOP, MANUFACTURER: WAYNE m 0 0- � � DALTON SERIES 7100 (COLOR -GRAY). (D j L O < o I z 2. GUTTER DOWNSPOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 6. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE WOOD COLUMN z o J �_ Of O Q 60 < NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS GALVANIZED DETAILS, COLOR - CREAM WAVE CRACKER", DE 6198 10. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE. Q J uj IRON (OR SIMILAR) AND BE COLORED TO MATCH RL#512, LRV 67. o O o ROOFS TILE. 11 . 3'-6" HIGH DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON GUARD RAIL 7. DECORATIVE STONE VENEER ELDORADO BRICK.® FINISHED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. PROJECT NO. 3. "LA HABRA" STUCCO SANTA BARBARA, COLOR -X-23 TUNDRABRICK 2021-21 ASPEN, BASE 200. 12. DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON FALSE BALCONY DWG. NO. REVISION NO. 8. "JELD-WEN" WINDOWS WITH GRID. ALL WINDOWS RAILING FINISHED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. 4. DECORATIVE SIDING, TEXTURE - TRADITIONAL LAP, SHALL BE DUAL GLAZED WITH LOW "E" ENERGY A— 1 . 2 COLOR - "FLAGSTONE", MANUFACTURER -"ALLURA". EFFICIENT GLAZING. 13. CAST STONE WINDOW AND DOOR SURROUNDS. I I 0 01 2 O3 04 5 6 7 8 9 'moo Z T T T o Joy o a LL o 83'-7 Q 6 7 9 w � Q www � O # 18'-1" 38'-0" 27'-6" 1 �z ~ � � = w � QcUnam °�° � � Q ole1 LL 8'-6" aQaO � Ow � Jw � 0Qz � U 5-1 9-2 3-10 25-3 12-9 6-0 13-0 6-0 1 ol 13'-0" 38'-0" 27'-6" z o � z � = p z = cn = z a > ow = 40 zozUa (DU , aF- >- ~ � w UP I i " " 2'-6n QQ > ~ 0 � ~ ZzZ0ZOH W ❑ I 9'-2" 3'-10" 25'-3' 12-9 6-0 13-0' 6-0 _ = a U A o U U o m U O w O o w = w z L= � w � 0 � w � ww � w W — W a � �Lu aZwZL� � � — � A = w ° = wX = � 0 � Lu moo Zl- o F/P F/P } ❑ { TjD A1Lcjl 1 O w (j _, COVERED FF:0.00' ❑ O � 1 DECK `J T PATIO#2 �1 UP = Q 1 91 N MASTER TV F- BEDROOM#2 m a BEDROOM C-23417 y UP (MASTER) I SUIT#1 EXP.2-20-2 �- - - ------ TV I UP ❑ I O m I /^` _ _ _ �UP OF CAL °� to FAMILY ROOM ❑ co LOFT � ❑ ❑ a EL U WIC#1 LL (MASTER) M 04 WIC#1 (MASTER) 6 ❑ � � � + ❑ �j�� BONUS ROOM 0 1 �J - - - COVERED ❑ O u DINING ❑ + � PATIO#2 -{- I �* IM EAT El + i ° w w QCL HALL F I O uP LIVING ROOM v V EAT co WIC I� i BATH WIC FDD O BAR TV&F/P I #6 HOWE #5 GALLERY #5 ,',� 1 ST6RAGE uP / W U •U� ro ❑ ISLAND iEF BEDROOM O o + LIBRARY/STUDY i #6 BEDROOM z •� I IEF i E TV TV U KITCHEN j FOYER O i o + N U w I I � �; 0 L.L aUP UP I m \� FOYER O a FF:o.00' HALLWAY/ STORAGE WIC I BATH v BATH o 0 REF I B#�H � #6 uP UP #5 � � BATH r U N I 00 ———— CLOSET ❑ ❑ F / FF:0.00 o EO BUTLER'S ❑ a ❑ a ❑ ❑ Q M 1 KITCHEN BEDROOM OPEN TO W #3 oo WIC BELOW WIC M I NF�l I TV I #7 BEDROOM v J v UP i ( (�6 -- - - BEDROOM #4 H PANT o ENTRY N TV / UJ UP POWDER PORCH I H TV CD - E FR-0.08'-0.1 T SLOPE BATH I 0 I � UP ~ I] #3 00 STORA UP LAUNDRY E. W 10'-4" -- 1 19 UP � ❑ ' l o V / I � I SLOB 2-CAR GARAGE uP uP 2-CAR GARAGE 41�—uP - I ROOF OVER 2 '- 26+-8" 22'-0" -up I GARAGE ROOF OVER GARAGE w w I I N I � I ❑ o i I � � � � � � N SLOPE N 1 N I ' ui -------L-----------------------------— --'-- ------- ---------------------T------------- i� w Lu FRONT SETBACK I LINE 42' FEET 1 MIw �- - - - c J LIj d 0 Li o I z o < Lu w X w1L) I Q X o�z X �n �n N co NT lf) Illl\VVI Illl\�VII I FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0° 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 11-011 2 Z co Q J � FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES El FLOOR PLANS KEYNOTES o Z o Oo Q - Qz 0 LOT COVERAGE - 5903 SQ.FT. (ALLOWABLE MAX- 6484 SQ.FT.) z H m 0 1-ST FLOOR HABITABLE AREA-4396.46 SQ.FT. 0 o m 2-CAR GARAGE (#1) -484 SQ.FT. w — C) o it = U 2-CAR GARAGE (#2) -484 SQ.FT. �_ m � � 0- U) 0 O ENTRY PORCH - 88 SQ.FT. cv O a_ Q w Q = COVERED PATIO - 399 SQ.FT. Z O O p "t Q 2-ND FLOOR HABITABLE AREA- 3359 SQ.FT. J of co m O O DECK- 399 SQ.FT. p BALCONY - 75 SQ.FT. PROJECT NO. TOTAL HABITABLE AREA- 7755 SQ.FT. (MAX- 7780 SQ.FT.) 2021-21 DWG. NO. REVISION NO. A-2 . 0 ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - w 000 � owZ o 0 FRENCH COLONIAL \ = J � � z wmw ww \\ oH- � = wz � Qow m 0 < TOP OF RIDGE Zw � 0 = w - ~ � = mJ O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Q 0 w : J D� J H LL ❑ ELEVATIONS KEYNOTES m o ZZ � 0 >. w Z = � = ° z oZow 0) Q � � � � a � w � Q > ow = w � � ¢lo / TYP. TYP. `\ wZQ � 0v � zv � � w „ „ R mlo 1 _ olz � < > � 6mmowoo � � wz 1 . CLASS A LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE TILE, MODEL - wlw \ �IJ w IY Fn w w w zwz � � BEL AIR,4883 HILLSBOROUGH BLEND, BIZ \ I c, = Q � w QLu � I // \ I = m ° = wx = � 10 � moo CRRC:0918-0098, MANUFACTURE - "EAGLELITE". I , 12 ❑❑ \ I ~ w D- m w ~ o D- o > o m Q 0 2. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS GALVANIZED IRON OR SIMILAR AND BE COLORED I ARCS TO MATCH ROOFS TILE. ) I 21°-s" TOP OF�EADER — — — — — — — — —\ 3. 'ILA HABRA" STUCCO SANTABARBARA, COLOR -X-23 20'-0" T011OFHEADER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - — _ _ — — - - - - ❑ ASPEN, BASE 200. � - - - \ x C-23417 I / ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ \ I � EXP.2-20-2 x, 4. DECORATIVE FALSE BALCONY I //` c ❑❑ ❑❑ 13 O a❑ ❑❑ ❑� O ❑❑ TYP. ❑❑ \ I I �~ 5. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE FIBERGLASS FOAM I I / 0 4 MOLDING FINISHED WITH MATCHING, COLOR - BENI- Iz �° TOP of RIDGE cARACE)M "CREAM WAVE CRACKER" DE 6198 RL#512, LRV 67. I 13'- _ I 6. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE WOOD COLUMN & I 11'- " FINISH FLOOR I DETAILS, COLOR - "CREAM WAVE CRACKER", DE I o'- " TOP of PLATE _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ — — _ — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — -- - -- —_ - - -- -- - - — 46198 RL#512, LRV67. 8'-0' OF HEADER7. ATTIC VENTILATION :r, 1I II OO I I O 8. "JELD-WEN" WINDOWS WITH GRID. ALL WINDOWS I s'-e TOP OF HEADER — _ _ _ 10'-7" 15'-0° SHALL BE DUAL GLAZED WITH LOW "E" ENERGY j 9 TYP. TY ❑❑❑❑ co ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ 9. 4-SECTIONAL OVERHEAD WOOD GARAGE DOOR 10'-0" 1 15'-7° ❑❑ 3 LLE ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ 9 I V WITH AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL DOOR ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ I OPENING AND SUN-BURST WINDOW TOP, I 1 ❑❑ ❑❑ I O MANUFACTURER: WAYNE DALTON SERIES 7100 I ±O.00 FINISH FLOOR 1st 0 V - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (COLOR -GRAY). I -8° F.G. — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ❑ — -8° F.G. Q I` 1 AT RESIDENCE 1 O A V L X I 11 . 3'-6" HIGH DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON GUARD 2-CAR G POWDER ENTRY PORCH I HALLWAY U Q RAIL FINISHED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. 12. DECORATIVE COLUMN MOLDING AT EDGES.. FOYER U V 13. DECORATIVE ORNAMENTAL OVAL MOLDING Q—14. SIGN (LOCATION OF BUILDING NUMBER). FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" 2 = Z �0 Z U = E Q Uw Q � ` U Qo 1 2 3 4 5 6 T 8 9 UJ co \ > 0 co \ 30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE 661 (D TYP. \ I on ZI ZI w i m m ` m Ct Lo - - - Im TYP. \ -Im o 1 25'-10" TOP OF RIDGE o 1 0 W0 Lij \ \ clo T I I 0 \ I / 20'-0" TOO, OF PLATE T I Lu G���F I❑\— — �❑ — — — — ❑❑ — — — — _ 18'-0" TOP OF H'E\❑ER 1 ❑/ — — — — ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ TYP. ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ _11❑❑ FIF]❑❑L IE 110 IE ❑❑ ` ❑❑ Mi LEE] I ML � tiA �e I � 11'-0" FINISH FLOOR T I 10'-0" TOP OF PLATE I I � m TOP OF ROOF iA I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER I w RIDGE ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ — — — — I = I ? Q U 10'-7" ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 6 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 15'-T' Lu Z �\e y/A I JLE�0001 OLI 11MUEU ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ Ji CD ❑❑ - - ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ � X o _ t0.00 FINISH FLOOR 1st I X o o - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - ❑❑ RIDGE _ -8" F.G. X � \ Z IL N M Lf) REAR (EAST) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 ti (n O dD Z G9( — — ❑ JP I O z 00 U �t� N a O Lu U > - -- a U) � > z w � ROOF OVER z Lij m t ROOF OVER I GARAGE I II-_ J a m GARAGE I w I J � Z CD 2 U ° 4�� Ji D a () /4;12 _L2 I �_ W ni O J Z � LL ~ NLL w ° a- a a maoo ❑ ALL ❑ � � J � � I�e y'AI �•e— — — — — — — — ,�, ti,A PROJECT NO. - - - - - — — — 2021-21 ZS`5" 25`4" DWG. NO. REVISION NO. 74._,,, A-2 . 1 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = V-0" 1 w w � } = Y 00 � z ~ � ~ , ot � WQ O W = J z J m w w w S Q w w Q H W U = } 0 w � � = W ~ � � Q m m H O Q Q w = O Oz w cnQOQOiw � � wc� � = w � 0 z Z Z O U Q U U U O Q } Q � } ~ z0 } ~ zzzz0z � � w TOP OF RIDGE 30'-0" w � w � Lu (if cnwwO � w — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Q = m = O w 0 Q H U U —I— � Uco u � Q � ~Lu Qz z � � W � WI ,D cnwi-- mwi-- oa- o > 0mQU N N ZIW O Z J �E� ARCS 12 4 x C-23417 EXP.2-20-2 TOP OF PLATE 20'-0" _ _ ~ I TOP OF HEADER 18'-0" TYP. OF CAL TYP. ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 12 ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ E TTYP. ❑❑ Ll � ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ o 4 �❑ U 0 0 FINISH FLOOR 11'-0" 13 �Y$ TOP OF PLATE 10'-0" 4 TOP OF HEADER 8'-0" v ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ — o ❑ ❑ ❑ 1E ❑ �— ❑ I'] ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a, ° ,FIN FLOOR ( st ISH 1 f0.00 Q ) .k F.G. -8" w U .(n O V = z � RIGHT (SOUTH ) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" E 0 � Uw Q � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ U 30'-0" TOP OF RIDGE TYP. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I�, - - - - LJ_ to T ZIP Q 0 N1a] W I�ID co Im co 1 C� 1CM- F1 � cy) I � w 1 " � � o � � c) 20-0 TOP OF PLATE "— — — — — — _ — — — — 18'-0 TOP OF HEADER = J — — — — — — — — ❑❑ ❑� ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ EEEL ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ n❑ TYP. V) CM ❑❑ 4 12 — — _ 11'-0" FINISH FLOOR 4 12 10'-0" TOP OF PLATE a 8'-0" TOP OF HEADER ❑❑ ❑� ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ TYP. ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 11111111 ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ 8 ❑❑❑ E❑ ❑❑ 3 P. ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ DOLL] V//-/\77 V//-/\77� ❑ it NO I IIII Ll Lim EIET 9 U w L 111 = I t0.00 FINISH FLOOR (1st). U — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — w — — — -8" F.G. . Z) z U) J U) CD d w C14 X X LEFT (NORTH ) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 0 N co ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - "FRENCH COLONIAL" ❑ ELEVATIONS KEYNOTES co 1 . CLASS "A" LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE TILE, MODEL - BEL AIR,4883 7. ATTIC VENTILATION Z o v HILLSBOROUGH BLEND, CRRC:0918-0098, MANUFACTURE - "EAGLELITE". O o . Q LL z 8. "JELD-WEN" WINDOWS WITH GRID. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE DUAL GLAZED > 0 Q 2. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE WITH LOW "E" ENERGY EFFICIENT GLAZING. z m o MATERIALS SUCH AS GALVANIZED IRON (OR SIMILAR) AND BE COLORED p � o Q U TO MATCH ROOFS TILE. 9. 4-SECTIONAL OVERHEAD WOOD GARAGE DOOR WITH AUTOMATIC J j z o =co v REMOTE CONTROL DOOR OPENING AND SUN-BURST WINDOW TOP, F- m O cn Z cu') O O 3. "LA HABRA" STUCCO SANTA BARBARA, COLOR -X-23 ASPEN, BASE 200. MANUFACTURER: WAYNE DALTON SERIES 7100 (COLOR -GRAY). ~ C'i Q w a Q Lu Q v z H Lu �_ � O 0 ccoo < 4. DECORATIVE FALSE BALCONY 10. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE. Q O w D- " Q Lo � 0 0 5. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE FIBERGLASS FOAM MOLDING FINISHED 11 . 3'-6" HIGH DECORATIVE WROUGHT-IRON GUARD RAIL FINISHED WITH WITH MATCHING, COLOR - "CREAM WAVE CRACKER" DE 6198 RL#512, LRV EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT. PROJECT NO. 67. 2021-21 12. DECORATIVE COLUMN MOLDING . DWG. NO. REVISION NO. 6. PRE-FABRICATED DECORATIVE WOOD COLUMN & DETAILS, COLOR - "CREAM WAVE CRACKER", DE 6198 RL#512, LRV 67. 13. CAST STONE WINDOW AND DOOR SURROUNDS. A-2 . 2 LANDSCAPE NOTES w � = Y O _ 1. ALL ON-SITE AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED BY OWNER OR OWNERS AGENT, ' o : uj 0 w ¢ o IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE DIVISION REQUIREMENTS AND ALL LOCAL 0Lu _ Y m m ( z AND STATE CODES AND REGULATIONS. Q � � � I':2,i o J o o o 2. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER OR OWNERS AGENT. cn Q o Z o w < w ' Q 3. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN PROPERTY LINES OF THE LOT. z z Z Q o Q } ° w 4. IRRIGATION AND PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROMOTE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. Q ¢ z z " z o z o w B 5. ALL STREET TREES AND ANY TREE WITHIN 8' FT. OF WALLS, HARDSCAPE, OR BUILDINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED o o m o w o 0 = w z w " w w w z w z WITH AN APPROVED LINEAR BIO BARRIER ROOT CONTROL BARRIERS OR EQUAL. 0 � 0- Q Q 6. ALL PLANTING LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING SET FOR = ° = w X = E - w Ln ° 12 o FINAL PLANT LOCATIONS. � w0- mw �- 00- 0 > 0m < 0 - _ 7. ALL TREES SHALL BE DOUBLE STAKED PER LOCAL CODES. EX. 4' HIGH FENCE -- 8. REFER TO LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING SET FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. - - EX. 4 HIGH FENCE QED AR 1' TO C EX. 3' HIGH BLK/RET/WALL ` w �� -� - - � � � m Ell � � � � � � � 9. TREE PLACEMENT MINIMUMS SHALL BE: 10' FROM LIGHT STANDARDS, POWER POLES, AND DRIVE APPROACHES AND 5' FROM FIRE HYDRANTS, UTILITIES AND PROPERTY LINES. NO TREES ALLOWED IN SWALES. y y y W ED 4' HIGH RETAINING WALL - - - - 10. ALL 2:1 SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED AND IRRIGATED PER THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CODES AND W W W w C 23417 W - T REGULATIONS. EXP.2-20-2 y 11. ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER ALL STATE AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CODES PROPERTY AND REGULATIONS. p4� W W I W W y rLINE 12. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATIC ET BASED CONTROLLER AND DRIP ��' CALF W J W IRRIGATION SYSTEM WHERE WATER IS CONSERVED, THERE IS NO RUN-OFF, WHERE ALL TREES ARE VALVED W SEPERATELY WITH STREAM BUBLERS W/ PC SCREENS, AND WHERE HYDROZONE AREAS ARE VALVED w SEPARATELY. REFER TO LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING SET FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS AND O SPECIFICATIONS. U 13. ALL SHRUB PLANTER AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" LAYER MIN. OF MEDIUM BARK MULCH THROUGHOUT. 14. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE FROM WEEDS AND DEBRIS AND MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY, O . X GROWING CONDITION AND SHALL RECEIVE REGULAR PRUNING, FERTILIZING, AND TRIMMING. ANY DAMAGED, w W $ + co DEAD, DISEASED, OR DECAYING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF +++t++ w W LOT 2 DAMAGE. /;:1 W w I W W + + + 15. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE WITHIN MINIMUM 5' WIDE INSIDE PLANTERS BOUNDED BY A CURB AT LEAST SIX l"J W T W W W 2 INCHES HIGH. A SIX-INCH HIGH CURB WITH A TWELVE (12) INCH WIDE CONCRETE WALKWAY SHALL BE 7 .W W ; :{: : CONSTRUCTED ALONG PLANTERS ON END STALLS ADJACENT TO VEHICLE PARKING SPACES. - O O W w I 1w W 16. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR ON-SITE RECYCLED WATER APPLICATION. Q V W ,+ CURRENTLY A RECYCLED WATER MAIN DOES NOT EXIST BUT IS PLANNED FOR IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THE ~ y W 1 . - OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A CONNECTION TO THE RECYCLED WATER MAIN WHEN m O IT BECOMES AVAILABLE. U $ REFER SHEET F-1 ( ' W W WI FOR FENCE DETAIL 17. ALL LANDSCAPING, BLOCK WALLS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS AROUND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS SHALL v Q _O(n y BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA W C) • w 1 W W W 2 O ■ I w W W w STANDARD DRAWING. w WI W W i W W 2 2 2 2 18. AN AGRONOMIC SOIL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED AND A REPORT INCLUDED ON THE CONSTRUCTION V - •- C RIVAL AREA CORRAL AREA DRAWING SET. Z F W�3 WI 1 w y W W W W W W y 4 19. ALL PARKING AREAS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, UTILITIES, BACKFLOWS, ETC. SHALL BE SCREENED WITH AN _ E VEHICLE GATE TO B EVERGREEN HEDGE. DESIGNED PER 1 ' 6� U ui NGINEERIN STANDARD w W W W W W W W - - - 20. NO GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLANTED UNDER SHRUBS, ONLY BARK MULCH. GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE DRAVVING 1006-B W _ W w WI � � i � 5 PLANTED IN MASSES IN FRONT OF SHRUBS. WWWWI �' S WATER CONSERVATION NOTES U W WI 1. LANDSCAPE DESIGN,INSTALLATION AND MANAGEMENT CAN AND SHOULD BE WATER EFFICIENT. Q d7 o RALAREA CORRAL AREA 2. SECTION 2 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION SPECIFIES THAT THE RIGHT TO USE WATER IS z W � %++'+'+'+'+`+'+'+`+` LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT REASONABLY REQUIRED FOR THE BENEFICIAL USE TO BE SERVED AND THE RIGHT DOES 0 '+ + NOT AND SHALL NOT EXTEND TO WASTE OR UNREASONABLE METHOD OF USE. J W W WI - f 4 - W � , . , ;+�+: . , . , , , , +;+++++++ f- 3. ESTABLISH LANDSCAPE THAT ARE PLANNED , ,INSTALLED ,MANAGED AND MAINTAINED WITH THE Q o w WI +1+++ +++;i'+;+;+;+;i;+'+#+;+;+;+',i;+',+;+ - WATERSHED BASED APPROACH THAT IMPROVES CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND PROVIDES wLo BENEFITS AND REALIZE SUSTAINABILITY GOALS.SUCH LANDSCAPES WILL MAKE THE URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL U) > O W ++++++++;+++}+++} RESILIENT IN THE FACE OF CLIMATIC EXTREMES. - W I . . . . . . . . . _ _ 4 REDUCE THE WATER DEMANDS FROM LANDSCAPE WITHOUT DECLINE IN LANDSCAPE QUALITY m y W 1 + +;+ + + + - - w W w WI - - I ' 5. IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPING ACT 2006 O W [ +2+ CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 1881 AND THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23 ,DIVISION 2 CHAPTER 2.7 w �- wyl . : �� ,+,: :�++++++ LOT 1 p c � +,+++++.*+++++ +++++++++ MULCH INSTALLATION W 1.+: I �� - AFTER ALL PLANTING AND IRRIGATION OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETE, COVER ALL EXPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS WITH 3" LAYER OF SPEC MULCH AS MADE BY RECYCLED WOOD PRODUCTS (877-476-9797), OR EQUAL. I i r 2 MULCH,BARK OR GRAVEL MUST BE INSTALLED JUST BELOW THE CURB, TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MATERIAL TO THE SIDEWALK i� I ! OR STREET. � I r r 6 2 i (D0O 2 2 2 E . 6' �.r '� w z L PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOT 1 AND LOT 2 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" uj - • � � 0 N PLANT LEGEND KEY NOTES - __-_-- --_ CD aaaaa HARDSCAPE LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY WUCLOS 1. PROPOSED CMU FENCE -SEE GRADING PLANS FOR HEIGHT - L TREE _ - 2. WATER FEATURE ^� DECORATIVE PAVERS O PARKINSONIA 'DESERT MUSEUM'/ DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 24 5 LOW 3. CORRAL AREA FENCE-SEE F-1 # .' �4. •� _ 4. PAVING FOR TRAILS 4" THICK DECOMPOSED MONK'S PEPPER TREE /VITEX AGNUS-CASTUS 24 3 LOW GRANITE SURFACE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE � ; ' .� ' i•' Y - _ ;` l _STAMPED CONCRETE @WALKWAY HORSE TRAIL err, =_` _ ` _ _ z' 5. VINYAL FENCE - C ¢ k,� � 6 o U 6. LINE OF SETBACK - _ ~ _ z0 N w SHRUB �; r r{, x -� - -� _ �._��_ U) > z ; r - " _�_ - - - w o 00 ¢ DECOMPOSED GRANITE @TRAILS 5 GAL. 46 LOW > o LAVENDULA 'PROVENCE'/ PROVENCE FRENCH LAVENDER AND CORRAL AREA O , . •W- ,ti..1YJ411..+3 +Y''!$' �y :� z ti J ¢ 2 LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS/ TRAILING LANTANA 5 GAL. 2 LOW LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE }# ` �. -'` w ¢ o co CD m 0 „ I-_ w cnz � � O O TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS/ GERMANDER 5 GAL. 44 LOW HARDSCAPE - tom'% o a- w = LANDSCAPE d ¢ ¢ 4 NOT IN USE LOT # AREA (SF) COVERAGE + � � z U Lu OQ'fo o � z O5 ANIGOZANTHOS 'BUSH GOLD'/ DWARF KANGAROO PAW 5 GAL. 26 LOW LOT 1 2564 12020 0 /o < Zz m m 0 GROUND COVER (80 /°) o Q o 0 LIPPIA NODIFLORA ICAMPAGNA VERDE'/KURAPIA 48" O.0 6073 SQ.FT LOW 2166 1648 PROJECT NO. FOLIUM ARCHILL A MILL Y " O.0 607 SQ.FT LOW LOT 2 (56%) (44%) 2021-21 E E / ARROW 48 DWG. NO. REVISION NO. KURAPIA GROUNDCOVER 48" O.0 607 SQ.FT LOW WATER FEATURE DECORATIVE PAVERS L 1 CEANOTHUS J.P. 48" O.0 607 SQ.FT LOW w 0Z � = Z ~ Jo� ~� wa o Z ❑ m " W �W }VLR IRRIGATION SCHEDULE _W ; _Q W H � WY Q J W U Zo 0 ,-- >W- 0 W uw :� ZW< 0� 0 =- ZONE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL QTY ' Q Q o w J W C � Q 0 o zz ❑ � z � � = oz = � = � W Z U Q U U cq Q1 � H � w Q � ¢ HZQH � UCZZ00- w Rain Bird 1804 15 Strip Series 6 LU a ~ 0'-LU O O LU W ❑ U U ❑ U — ❑ d2WZ W � a < WW < ZWZE0fU ~ 2 H cn a- H cow H ❑ W ❑ > ❑ coQ U .00, 0- Cf2 W X2 — W — w — E � O 296.00� _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p � � Q ® Rain Bird 1804 8 Series MPR 47 92.50' 10 10 10 10 Rain Bird 1804 10 Series MPR 21 ��D ARCM � I 12 12 12 12 12 Rain Bird 1804 12 Series MPR 2 01.4 x C-23417 > ---- x II 10 i ,° SIDE SETBACIS——_ Q T H TQ F �.2-20-2 8 r---- LINE 10 FEET N 5 5 5 5 0 Rain Bird 1804 15 Series MPR 5 �oF i COVERED PATIO Q T H TO F CA 8 II I' " 1 j//////// OVER D ,n 1 15.2 4TIOSYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL QTY / / /// /, 17//////�//////� O oO ° 2 / 2-CAR U 'ARAGE 0 p Rain Bird 5004-PC, FC-LA 13 O i 1" 18.3 15 5 / O C 1%2" / a �y oc 0- C6 8 2 a BF / / 2.0 Rain Bird 5004-PC, FC-LA 7 i ❑ / / w O LOT 2ii 10 _/ is ,0 1�4 ❑ v, o 0�8 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL QTY Q o / N II IIII U ti 8 I �-2° 2"- I III--a" Z PROPOSED 2-STORY / / � io ,o d' I I I io I I 8 a W SINGLE FAMILY j Rain Bird DV 1 " 5 p ,z io e I 0 � � � RESIDENCE o� 28 O 155'—59' gF Febco 825Y 1 " 1 U Q 0 10 / w c) '^ e I,o ,2 V! / : I I � � III / 1 _ -0 / Rain Bird ESP4MEi 1 — O 2II c0 )RIVEWAY I I / 2-CAR / R70 z �0 / GARAGE Rain Bird WR2-RFC 1 z U _ E IaI �,0 2.0 �// //// POC . . 0 LU I� Point of Connection 1 1 Q 8 10 3 ' V 1 1" 8.0o rn \ Irrigation Lateral Line. PVC Class 200 SDR 21 1 11220 U. I ----SIDE SETBACK 40' T \ Q e � LINE 15 FEET \ � � ; 10 20 10 � Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 1 1/4" 23.1 I.f. z w M 8 - II I ID M Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 1 1/2" 157.8 U. L4- -U-) R — — — — Q JES_TRIAN TRAIL — — — — a of M e I I 4"COVERAGE OF c DECOMPOSED GRANITE � � W Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 2�� 141 .2 I.f. > zo I ,° � - - - - - - - � 42 � I 15 SETBACK FEET �UI _ _ _ _ _ _ Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 4" 46.9 I.f. w o J e z � I Valve Callout Q M m 10 N I I # Valve Number 2.0 � z.o / 0 / I #" # Valve Flow co I I w / I > � \ I 4 `� a / / i Valve Size / 8 12'-2" ,Ye A � LOT 1 \ /� / � \ I 1.0 '° / 'ROPOSED 2-STORY / w \ U81 IIII 8 8 / / > I 5 / SINGLE FAMILY ° / ova \� III- Z / RESIDENCE / I Y III IIII 8 8 w , / I U / �o w U 6 8 5 D Q 0 a N / TANDEM I o ti o I Z N M aaaaa 8 I,o zo ,o O I SIDE ETBA ------ ----- - ------------ -------------------- Z o LIN 5 FEE , O O N Q 0 o U o wo En 8 LO N w00 > Z Ir- 194.00' 96.0 ° o2 —� � Zyn.uu o 0- CO 0 o 6.00 w n- Q QU ±100' LENGTH RETAINING \ Z ° o o I- Z� � U Q LOO� � m m 0 0 0 PROJECT NO. 2021-21 ITT .R 0 15 30 45 feet DWG. NO. REVISION NO. NORTH SCALE: 1" = 15' - 1 • 00 / 1 / CTI / 1800 � - - - - � I - Z EX. WV X. FH - - � I I � I� —`'� - - - - - � / ,/ / _ - -' r /�180� \ I1�— — � 17 Es CL CD IL - - X APN: 9I_�--5�_/`—!�—_/\_—•"—iI \/\/\//—�\��%/�\\�\'�,�/\\/__�j—1\I I—/--\/-'�'t�/—1\/�1,�—/`r\v/—�---.-_�-�,�-_---/--��_//,—❑_-i--�__I\I\'I_—�,,�_—1_�—\�—\�---_I_-—\—-,�—\-I�I//\i-—J�I�j\j 1,\-,I--III\II'-/'1 I\/I I I IIVI I�Ii-II I�/'I\III/III�,I I I III I I1 I►1\/III !IIIII II/I\ I�►i/II/IrII I II►I\\I\II I\ljI I I//I�\I7/\'/`/a II\II'I I/L�lIIII/I III_/—/_\/'/_/-\�--/--//\'//__/''-\�//]/Y//°-I/°_//1//�IIII�/�I I\IIII\^�\I\\I II� --_J--_--`U�Q-///1/////3/WQ�QX�\�\��IIIIIII\\\\�,\\\\\\/�\\\1\\\-„\�/a\\�'\`\�/\\�\\\IW`��k(IIII'II�I�^'III rl I I II-_\,\\\\I I\.I~o{{�l�\\`JWZ\��\I��\�—'\/\///\t'_,�[I/\_/\v//I-I-\/--/-//_/1 I�/\/I---�1j_�_\/\o\-/_//-w'—/--/-_�--'/y-y-'-'-\'-„_---'��[JY►_--—.-�--'�-—/"-�-�—_/--I y�_Y�--`�_-//--/II_—--/—_—-/--_/---1-'_------_-\'--,-��'_-�---�'---'y�r--,II—_-I _�--\\\-I -_�-E��/_9-c�-'_91-�/_—4—II-/I II I-_-T—�-/--\-1—f-------—I-_--I_I-I-I I-I/-=---/�----'---_/--_-I_4/j /8 1'-0�7 I---—4�--/----�'i--ce 1t--}�----I-J---G/— I---�-0-�IJ,�I I F3�—I-0—D___IN=0—IIIG---0\----0Elf /-'/`--/'X/�'--•—�/'�-=u/IIII/'/�/-///1/-- 00 � C I W 4- � LLJ VLR = ❑E ED`ARE _a ZONO'-:: HENC \ LLJ X w EX. FLAT GRASS AR A - - - - - - - - - — _III�,II I ►_ I—I III II I 1 I r1I II I I\ � - - - _EX,4GH FENCE EX� LBOX P T G K/,RE WALL �77 el- uu .00 _ r 790-X. SIGN ER,�Y W EX. C&G r — PROPERTY/r I g O I LLJ y >9 0D w > R O� IG'TE ME Q�1 CUT P. � J LIMITS OF r0 JO -7 W If 1 0 o 0 \ I LIMITS OF I GRADIN VLR - - - - - - - - - - I 1795-- - - - ZONE-EX. IN EX. SIN ,�x I l E EX. SM 1 81.12 �k788.45 F /INV INV= 171.45p Cu T / / \ o Lu -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - rr LLJ V Woo 7 LLIMITS OF O W" GRADING_ I PR EF I > LIMITS 9/ --/ Ti -1-;/ / /-- IIII I�-- -/-- -- \/ _- _-- — /--/ / --/l I � / -- 1790 X. 1GN EX MAIL / ' — — �— — — — — — IN }p I I I /PROPERTY �) o 7> INE r LIMITS OF GRADING 1771.50 Q/111/// — - -1770— S EX LDGFL INV 6 RIM- 79.30 —1785 INV= 1771 `- EX. SMH / 3U- 7- & EX. AC PAVING 5 .00, y _ _ _ _ _ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEX. PC R - 1775 5 ��)I'CDVLR ARKI GS GRASS I I PAKINGS I II `/t v j/ Z / /EX. SIGN ZONE W Li 'N: /01 -0-000 Graphic Scale _ 20 0 10 20 40 In Feet 0 GRASS 1 inch 20 ft. _f/fI1 6' oCD E LT. rL( EX. F , — — — — — - _ � ,HIL - - - - - - - - -r - - - — �-------- I '/ 1I4�I`1IIIII _ — -�J �--\— GRASS L ; \\I\\1\ \\\ --1-77'— 0—L---- - - - - - + - - - - - � ENGINEER OF WORK — ��Sa�_Q�T��E oQL F•F sCE TCIVs.As�Lyi�Foc�QNSPB ENGINEERING, INC. 1391 WINDEMERE LANE TUSTIN, CA. 92780 II O ^C X PHONE (714) 931-0912 No. 66 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF:1 EX.P. 9025�G281 IL fcLE rrt., 02.15.22 MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES DATE W LSON AVENUE OWNER & DEVELOPER � S/W COR. SEC. 23, ARCHIBALD AVENUE LLC CUT AND FILL EXHIBIT T.1.N, R. 7 W. 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 20297 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. 91737 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH CELL PHONE: (626) 224-4636 RANCHO C UC AMO NG A, CA. 91737 SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN 5. As-built Certificate: FOR I hereby certify that the "Record Drawing" Measurements as shown hereon were made under my supervision or as noted and are correct to TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 20297 the best of my knowledge and belief. 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO C UC AMO NG A, CA. 91737 Signature of Professional Civil Engineer Date Wet Seal 1. WQMP BMP As-Built Certificate I hereby certify that the necessary water quality management plan storm water structural treatment (Best Management 5 Practice) devices have been constructed under my supervision and are functional to the best of my knowledge as of the date below. — — o I �� — — — — / / /— / Signature Date � I 00 APN. 1074 1 1 03 0 000 (, ; / / / / g \ \ o z \ \ I I °� ii U I X X ❑ // / / Wet Seal ILLJ vv Q v > Iv v I � x ow I o � \ vEX. CO I AB I I a w O a I ❑ �\� �^ °O °�° o �� I I � Z p ❑EX-, N ED-AREA VLR I x Y a_ d / \ X \ X \ I / \ �a I oU ! ' � ZONE Wm \ I I \ �✓ \ / � — — I — — — — — — — —EX. FLAT GRASS AR A / — \ '- - - Ex �FrGH FENCE -�. �_ / - PROJECT SUMMARY 0 THER PROJEC T hJ 7 \ -EX_ L BOX- of \ \_ _ �- - $9�9 E - - ,�49.00- x. ENCE _ _ _ W BMPs LIST-- I �g P � x 'To _ IGH K T/WALL / GROSS AREA - 1.928 AC 83,994 SF - �- � ��� DEDICATION = 0.283 AC / 12,353 SF \ = W W—Y NET AREA = 1.644 AC / 71 641 SF _ \ ' , CATCH BASIN MS4 STENCILING AND SIGNAGE \ I I t WYY W WYY W JYY W W W W A% J. YY W W W W W W W W W W /Y W W WYY W/ WYY / yy I I I r _ _ _ _ - - -- AREAS (ONSITE) LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM EX. C&G \ X. SIGN E \Y W !� y— W W \W\ Y Y W W W W W W Y W -H —W— 4 W W W W W W W W W W W W W /W W Y W W Y/ Y W W W W I r / / —_ ly I -� PRE-CONSTRUCTION / / PROPERI Y/ - - - INFILTRATION PIT II \ W \\ I W W W W W W — �QVEREDPATIO W W W W W W W /W W y y W W/W W y W W jW J LINE //� NET & GROSS AREA------1.644 ACRES / 71,640 SF STREET TREES AND PARKWAY W W W .3� 96.00 W �/ �— W W W W Y W W W W W W Y W W / z y� /// PERVIOUS AREA---------1.220 ACRES / 53144 SF r - \ W \\ \ I PARCEL POST-CONSTRUCTION LID PRACTICES TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THIS PROJECT: > \ RIG 2 O /l/ / \ Y W W WYY W W IYY W W �. �. .� �. �. �. �. �. �. �. .� �. �. .� .� / �. �. .� .� NET & GROSS AREA------1.644 ACRES 71,640 SF / M R W W ro Q r, W W Y Y W W / u. �. �. u. u. u. u. � � � � I I // - CONSERVATION DESIGN FS-796.20 \ ' - o / / / / /// IMPERVIOUS AREA--------0.341 ACRES / 14,880 SF W = / - RUNOFF CONVEYANCE w ,� W W W W W W W W W W Y W— W W /Y/ Y W W Y Y W W W Y W W W / / / // PERVIOUS AREA---------1.303 ACRES / 56,760 SF \ FF=797.70 � 11 W W W W W W W \Y W W l / / / - ROOF DOWNSPOUT DISCONNECTION \ \ \ W W W W W ,l _ - - - / I / // ONSITE AREA DISTURBED --1.159 ACRES / 50,503 SF � V• W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W > O O W W .YY/ W W .Y W W W �. W W W W W WY W W WY W .YYY W W W / \ PAD=797.03 U / / ITS OF COMSTRUCTION / - EFFICIENT LOW IMPACT LANDSCAPING _ - V• `Y `Y W/ W W .� LAMITS OF W W W W W W W W W W W W W .Y W W W W GROSS SITE AREA-------1.928 ACRES 83,994 SF �_ W y I AND PERMIT ' z p Ii — PRflPO�ED 2-STORY, W !� GR DIN�W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WI W W W W / I I I I I - NON STORMWATER DISCHARGES 1„W NW �Wuj U) SINGLE FAMILY \ �D W � W W W W W W W W Y W Y Y W W W W W W Y Y W �_ Y Y W W Y W W Y RESIDENCE \ — — '� U- III \ \ / \;7 \ NW �W W W W W V• V• \ . . W W . Y W W . W W W W W W JY—W �Wx� / W W W .Y W V• V• 71* I 0No - LIWITS*OF �/� // GIr"a �1iC SCale W �'Y W W W W W W W W W W/ .Y WY W W W W W W W W W V• W W W W04 �9S, - - _� G�1�I - - - � / I VLR0 10 20 40_ —[� [ e , ( ZONE / EGEND \ _� -EX. S N FX S VL'w WW �\ _ \ �Y W W �Y W �Y �Y W W �Y �Y W J� W W W �Y W W W W �Y W � W W l l I I MEMO EX. C&� EX. SMH �� I \�W W l� u. �. LLLLLLLLLLLLLL L�CLLLLLLLL �� / ��� � ( ) Drainage Area Boundary \y_ 1 81.12 \ I / \ LLLLLLLLLLLL L�LLLLLLLLLL I / / In Feet \ (1788,45) / \` I W Y .Y W W W � Y F INV ---� � L_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_ L L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LL � � / / inch _ 1(. .Y W .Y Y W W Y Y W W W V• W W Y W W .Y W W W W W W W W W W -Jc W W W W W W W W W W W W W LLLLL�LLL���L �LLLLLLLL�LL L I inch 20 ft. INV-�1781.45 6° \ \ LLLLLI-LLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLL I WYY WYYYY W W W W W W W W �K `YYY W WYY W W W W W W W W W W W W WY W W W W W � - _`-- "� LL �LLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLyLL General Surface Flow Direction w W w w W W .v w w w w w L- LL-L-LLL-L-L L-L-LLL-L-LLLLLLLLLL-L- LL-L-LLL .v / \ \ WY WYYY W L W W W W W W W W W `Y YYYY\ Y WY W W W W WYYYY WYYY WY �C I , \ \ J■r1/_1 LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLILL LLLLL / (\per]^) O L- 130 g 1 W Y W W W Y W W Y W W /LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL� LLLLLLLLL Y l L\� / FIOW Length — / L_L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LL_L�LL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L- I (� I `/ O \O WY W W W W W W W W W W W W W .Y W W W.y W WY W W W W W W W W W W iILL W W I`� I W W W W W . W W W W W W W W LL LL LLLL LLLL LLL,,L�LLLLL LL L L \ \ — LLLLLLLLLLLLLLCLLLLLLL LL LL / I / _ Drainage Sub Area Designation w / L tLt � z �LtL�tztLzLtL"ttzCt�L ��t�L � tLL � ��tzLL�tztL�tzrtL �zL�L��LZL��zL� �z W �/ O w \ L- L- L- L-L�L- L- L- �LL-L- L- L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL I I I I I L-L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L- L I L L L LLIL /�_ _ _ , A 1 \ \ \ y L L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL��LLLLLLLLLLLL� Ll_ L LL�LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 1 LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL�LLL / LYJ I - - FINISHED GRADE 12 WIDE BY 20 LONG FINISHED GRADE \ Q O L LLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLCL�LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZL� LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL289.91 _LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL �LLLLLLLLLLLL CLLLLL 1 1 .928 w \ \ O i LLL- LL-L- �LLLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-L LPL-�L_ LL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_ L�L_LLL_L_LL LPL- LL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_ LL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LJ. L_L_L L_L_LLL_L_LLL_L_LL LLL_L_LLL_L_ � �� � LL � � � / '� � ,�, Sub Area Acreage L�L LL L LLLLLLLLLLCL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 'L�LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIL LLCLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL \ w I LLLL�LL�LLLLLLLLLLLLZL� LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL-LLLLLLLLL�LL1LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL�LLLLLLLL�LLL,LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLI _-�L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL-LLLLLLLLLLLLL�L / \ z � L-LL LLL- LLL-L-LLL-L-LLL-L-LL LtL�LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLB LL L LC LL LL LL L� tt_ttrt CL—L LL LLB L LL LL �L�L-LLL-L-LL LL LL L • � �� `� �'- CC LPL L C L_�L��C�rtL�LCC L�L�L L_ L \ Q �•� m---u �W �d �d��� �W �y �W �W �- �c ��c. m �m -� �m -�i' 4�__+ LLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LL LL-.L w _ _ o w> \ _ \ LLLLLLLLLLL�LLLLLLLLL L - IMPERVIOUS FILTER CLOTH RIVER GRAVEL Y W W W W W W —W W -L —Y` Y W W J.\ W W W AIL W W W W W W W W W W W .Y \.Y W W .Y WY W W W W W W W vVVVVVVVVVv (�. 1�an _ _ / LL L-LLL-L LID BMPs SUMMARY: \ 7� \\ \\ I W W \W W~W W W W W W W- W" W�W� \ W\ W W W W� WY W W WY .Y .Y W W WVV W WVV� W W LL-L-LLL-L_ L_L_LLL_L_LLL_LLLL_L_L LL W , / ON BOTH SIDES OF TRENCH N w\ \ \ LLLLLLL LLLLL LLLzLLLLLLL LL _ YYY �Y— b- WYY W L W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1• YYYYYYYYYY J W . WYY LIMITS OF LLLLL LLLLL LI�LLLLLLLLL L/ / I� L-L-LL LLL-L-LL L- LL-L-LL L-LLL-L- .r / — \ - �\ - - ,� _ _ �- �- =GR�401t�G L-L-L LL-LLL-L-LL LLL-L-LL�L-LLVL- PEA GRAVEL \ \ o \ I - \ \ - _ - - LLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLL/LLLLL L / / / / DMA Al = 83 994 SF (1 .928 Ac) \ I �Y W W W W W �Y W \ W �Y W W W �Y �Y W �Y W W W �Y W W W �Y W -m- � W W W/ LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL�LLLL LL/LL LLLL/LLLLL�L / �Y / � � / mil_ W— }_ -6rY WY �W W\ WYY W WYY W W W W W WY W W WYYY W J�' W / \ \ W W Y W W W w w — - - _ ` — w _u w w w w w w w w w w w w LLLLLLLL �LLLLL�LLLL LL L / / I �/ z / / / BMPs GRASS SWALES I\ \ C Qp W �, \W W �, �, W W �, W W �, �, W W W �, LLLLLLLL LLLLLL LLL L LL W Q / EX. AIL B W W W W W W W W 00 — \ \ I _ PROPOSED-2-SST-GRY I� W W Y W_W .� \ 00 v� \ �.- L-L-L L L-L-L L DECOMPOSED C_ / OMPOSED GRANITE \ I u SINGLE FAMILY \ \ '� y �� / - / / ' LLLLLLLL � � � � �"�,� /�` � (/ �" / � / �� � / INFILTRATION INTO GROUND C (� / \ � \ � � ��D€NC E ` �' �' W W �Y �W\W W �Y �Y W W �Y V` W �Y �Y �Y/ �Y �Y L W W W �Y �Y �Y / �Y/ �Y O / 1� EX. C&G F \ `' I C14, W W W W W W Y Y W -k- _ — _PARCEL\ Q N_ W\Y\ W Y Y �' \ W W W W W W\ _ �/ �� DWI IW W/ / / / J/ // GRAVEL PIT GRAVEL FILLED TRENCH � J. YY W WYYY Y W W y- w W W\W W J. W\ \ J. J. W W W J W .Y •Y J. WYY rlr� Y W WY 010 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W v >� W/LIMITS 0� /�� /' / / / _ NO SCALE BRICK PAVERS Q W W Z- W W W W W W W W W\ W W W W W WV �✓ V• \ N - \ - - - ° � / GRADING WY /\ O / Y WYY W WY \ \ \ YY W W �W\ Y WYY\ WYYY �7"D' Y W W W J / Y /Y \ EX. MAIL I X. ION W W W W W W W W \ W W Y Y D Y Y Y Y\ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y /* /YLL. \FF 7 88.00 \.Y W W W \WYY W W .YY W /W W W/I /W/ W I'll I / / // / \ BMP's MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE W I \ W W W W �`Y WY W .Y W W W W \W W W W W W W W W W W .Y .Y W W I W I .Y / � �, W W PAD-787.33 � ,� II W � � � ,� �, I �. �� �II I�I I�.I/ / � / )� / / � GRAVEL PIT AND CATCH BASINS TO BE CLEANED OF BUSHES, LEAVES AND ANY BMPs COORDINATES \ \ / I O \ N W W W .Y W BIJLDRIG W W W W W W W �-W W W W / \ l �� / \ W (F \88.50) �� % - W W W/ IW I� W /I� I I I/ � OVERGROWTH. CLEANING SHALL BE DONE ONCE EVERY SIX MONTHS, AND AFTER P- N 34.15166 E -117.59261 \ oo I 00 \ W W W W IW I �I"I I I I wl / J PROPERTY (0) ANY RAINSTORM EVENT. GRAVEL IF WASHED OFF SHALL BE REPLACED TO THE PIT. W W W JYY W W \YY W WYY \W\ WYY W WYYYYYY W - - \ \7��0 \\ ; II/ II W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W / I� / III I� I I INE P-2 N 34.15134 E -117.59262 \ V) W W\ W W W W W W W W W W W W LIM4TS OF W \W W W W W 1 /� /� / IrlII �I/ �/ / RESPONSIBLE PERSON \ \ /i \ I\ �y �� u` W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W► GR�UINIG W W W W W Y W Y W Y W W W Y W Y W Y W W W W/� 1` W l�I / I l/ l _ P-3 N 34.15165 E -117.59306 \ 7 _ _ _ _ _ CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH (PROPERTY OWNER) \ 1771.50 I \ W W W W\ W W W W W W W W W W W .Y W W W W W W W .Y W W —W'-- V� —W_ WY _W— Y W/ W /.Y /.Y W /I `Y/ l -1 77O _�- �/ f7` - CELL PHONE: (626) 224-4636 P-4 N 34.15131 E -117.59306 I / FL/INV \� — —1' — 1� / <�IIII�II SEX. LDG �— \ \ / J.� W � � Y Y W Y\ Y W W �w W W W � � W W W\ W W W W W J J Y Y Y W W Y Y Y Y Y W W Y W W� � -W —= W W— •Y� Y�\�//�/�/l/ l I� / I I 1 \ I/1 �'/� �1( I�C� I NV- \�77�.JV� -- / \ .y .Y .Y \.Y W W W .Y W W W W W �W� W W W W W W� 4� W —Y WY WY ]l. �. �85.y �Y W W i8Y W/_W/W —uc- -.Y -I �W— Q��/J✓ iQ JJ.Y .Y/L.IL( LL:- EX. I \\ SMH �W— W WYY W W W W W W W Jf - \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - X. ��— -� NON TRAFFIC RATED \ E �/ '1' \ W Je W \ W W W W W W .YY W W W W W W W WY / /— — / \ x. S-.-\ \\ =- - - - W W—y P w w �w u w/ s W /� — of i jw �w mow— �- u /; I/ > GRATE AND FRAME - _EX. WV' �, E MMI z s -� - ,d - a / - - LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE \\ r — _ — —i— —� -- — �— -- — —— — — ' _ =—= = — ____— �� _— _ — o o EX. AC PAVING 5 .00/ / II EX. uG� WeoD FE 290:09= / �-}�` - - - - - - -__-- - - � - - - _ - / - - - -,- - - - - - -1775- - - - - - - - -- —� / =- - - - � — — — EX. PCC RB — — — — — — — / l - - - - - - - - - - —— — — — — / — \ z — — - - - - — F — - - - - - - _ — � � / a �� of II - - - - I #4 REBAR 12 0/C 5„ ;� i / _', " I �� —� — ��� GRASS // VLR / / � �PARKINIGS � o w I PAKINGS I III — // / o w `/� O w / z L OUTLET EX. SIGN^II- - I �� Z / / // c.�a / ZONE / _ - ` -_ - _ ,= TO STREET CURB �\ w 0Q , _A'hN: 1074-�-'01 -0 000 IIv �5, CATCH BASIN OUTSIDE 36 O = I DIMENSION w l I II DEPTH AS SHOWN ON PLAN CATCH BASIN DETAIL NO SCALE QR�FESS/0N �O Q ST. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: w No. 66815 EX.P. 9.30.22 'f it-.1amu S O4.12.22 CIVIL �P MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES DATE TEOF CA,\-W � - - - - - - - HILLSIDE ROAD 00 .� 1 > CTI N�p� // �' � ' ) _ 00- / Lj PEACH I - LEGAL DESCRIPTION o TREE LN. /l "�/ \ m PROJECT a _ - -- SITE i _ -- - THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, _ _ of STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: oF �,, -_ __ _ - �� \ f� lI� I / / THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 1 ¢ a / I � - NORTH RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF WILSON AVE. Z_7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP OF SAID LAND APPROVED JUNE 20 1884 BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: VICINITY MAP E . WV \\ X. FH - - � I I� -� I � ' / I �' // / / - � - - �� / �� /' I ` ' , / I I I �p / / / / , I I' BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 00 25 20 NO SCALE EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 280.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF L - / // ,/ / / ____- I/ / S� BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°25'20" EAST 247.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH r--- -- _ \ / I k / 89°40 59 EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE OF �� „ -�, I I /\-���� / I / // _ - - \ /_ \ I I II/ 340.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°25 20 WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE, 257.06 W I �� � ' , / I/ FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°40 59 WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE 340.00 FEET I I T -\/s �\ �- / \ Y� \ � -� � \ I � � ��' ��- �) � � � � � I I / / // r 1 \� � /// / � � - --��� TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. \ 1 I / ONSTRUCT 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL / I / // I I� - / APN: 1074-181-02-0-000 WW I \ \\ \ I uj oo I - / o BENCH MARK - v \ L w - _ _ _ _ � / I \ � � I / r - \ ii I �-��1 I _ 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED "CITY OF RANCHO X - - -� - rt w� I APN: 1074- 1 -03 0-000 w /' CUCAMONGA BM 10105 1987" AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD z ' Z \ I �\� \ I ONSTRUCT 4' MAX. HIGH BLOCK RETAINING WALL AND 6' HIGH�BL ALL X w al // / o // // // /// /i ' AVE. AND HILLSIDE RD. 3 FT. NORTH OF BEGINNING OF CURB RETURN. \ Q \ I \ I \ I I I I o ® BENCH MARK NO: 10105 \ I I � '1 I � N� w i I � / / / / ELEVATION: 1864.770 ADD 1000.00 TO NEW ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN \ X. I L? o w o I ❑ ❑ % Q VL R I °O ool D ID CD z" / // / / // / I ADJUSTMENT YEAR: 1987 c� \ I a' rn z oo M I ❑E : N ED`AREA p �� / / X X v I 5 19 �J °' 19 ❑ ZONE w m / /��- / - / / ��� I SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY ``' \ ( _ - \ I - - -EX. FLAT GRASS R A / - - - - J , - - - - - - o-,- i - - - -- - - - - - - _ - - - __-/ THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS PER AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY 15 �.0� - - -- 6X 4-41G4 FENCE / \\ \ B _ �_ - W304 -E X. ENCE - - - - - - - - PERFORMED BY SPB ENGINEERING, INC. ON MARCH 28, 2020. - \ I 7� -EX L BOX \ I Y� �\ _ - - _ _ _ _ \ TOPOGRAPHY UPDATED JULY 2nd 2020 � ( -�� 1 BLK WALL - - � � - , i� - � � \ • � - - '� � L1.o%�` - � � -� 7 -- - - _-�-'- - _ _ _ � !���J..=- / - ' ' �- - - _ I LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY 2. % 1.0% ^�`� \ o � � / / �- _ - - - _ _ _ - _ 1 l l _ _ J _ \ CD - _ _ EXISTING ZONE----------VL ,gym � � Q �- - - -� � � - - I X. SIGN I o,`�' ICK PAVER 1°' v� �, \ \1°' �� o0 0 0 0 / _ / - I EX. C&G \ '\ �, 17 \ ��, �i IRON EX. WATER I / - ' - -17g0- - - _ \ \ / / --S--- ------ EXISTING SEWER PROPOSED ZONE--------VL I 12 w ,CF)6 c - PROPER Y / -- - _ _/ g0 \ \ I r \ - 9 r- m SHED - - - PUMP/WELL I / I / / /, ��� I --W--- ------ EXISTING WATER EXISTING USE----------SINGLE LOT W/2 DWELLINGS Y - cD N 796.00 AC PAVED DRIVE � FS797'36 '� \ I I / / LINE // / / \ 1 I \ 1 �! FS FSL�VERED fi/XTl(J a� - _ �� / / 1 --G--- ------ EXISTING GAS PROPOSED USE---------2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES \ I \ W M FS 19.5 rn m a � _ / w // / ------ ------ EXISTING FEATURES NO. OF NUMBERED PARCELS -------2 (TWO) 383 96.00 3 - - �-- :�: - // Z / // \ \ - - - ----- ------ EXISTING CENTERLINE - - - 797.03 / ' / J - NO. OF LETTERED PARCELS -------1 (ONE) a� ( 1 �, ��\ PATI ,0 13 FG 25. L / // � _ - _ F� -?-CA / / // \ - - ------ EXISTING BOUNDARY �_ o i ---- PROPOSED LOT LINE I - _ x • E�3• .%' � �-� � 10' � .p; . // ( �� NET = 1.644 ACRES AGE cO P - m ``' = J / I / / / CB -- EXISTING CATCH BASIN PARCEL �. I ^ N / �- y PARCEL 1-------------0.821 ACRES / 35,762 SF GROSS & NET III 11 I I I I C - - o ii MF�R: dl \ =796.20 3 TEPS - - �l� o.. �e -\ \ / / // . - - , \ / / / LT ------ EXISTING ON-SITE LIGHT - R ------------- R 3 SF GROSS & NET - h Q, / / / PARCEL 2 0.824 ACRES 5 878 - '^ '��` - / / // C / - / / / / / / HC ------ EXISTING HANDICAP / , I I ^ z o FF=797.7� 11 • �- J \ / / / / ------ PARCEL A ------------0.283 ACRES 12,353 SF L <„ \ - I / / FL EXISTING FLOWLINE / _ / o CL ------ EXISTING CENTERLINE ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.---1074-181-02-0-000 _ `` '� PAD=797.03 % / / / SMH ------ EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE " 795.80° ,� ��� / LIMITS OF \ / // / / / 0 O J / I II I I r ' �� ,� ,�- - - // \\ CUT\ GRADING I / I l I l I / ( -f-�/ WV ------ EXISTING WATER VALVE 1 _ 1% �� -- - -- - AREAS (ONSITE) --- C14 >, N EX. WATER 110% I / � I I / I I I � ST.LT. ------ EXISTING STREET LIGHT Z N C i cn ❑ \\; III I 1 00 ^ \ : I I ---- / / I III / I II I I II II C&G -- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PRE-CONSTRUCTION _ _ - O I (El � cn 27.5 \\\ N 1 . / c�.i / // / I _l-I-/ ST ------ EXISTING STREET NET & GROSS AREA------1.644 ACRES / 71,640 SF I 6 i1' cv o - - - _ I LIMITS OF ,/ / / ( / I 1 / / FH ------ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT IMPERVIOUS AREA--------0.424 ACRES 18 496 SF N 7� _ � 6% - _ GRADING � / / l I w / I I I l / � / , 9S VL R a / \ 1 / / FF ------ EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE PERVIOUS AREA---------1.220 ACRES / 53,144 SF -- - - - - - - - - I 2.5 �� 1795 Y/ \ SL ------ SEWER LATERAL ❑ I _ U r- FILL = 2.5 MAX. m _ ,- , `r I ZONE POST-CONSTRUCTION ( I I SI III �� Q II w 793.0 TF / `c�i 1 O / I w� -STEPS UP ' w -0 I EX. C&G - \ 1 to cn C'3 � 31.5 21.5 11% •TEMP P a w Co -I \ EX. SMH 1 81. 2 I J 22' cn 14.5 2 5 01 � / ' I I I EX. EASEMENTS NET & GROSS AREA------1.644 ACRES / 71,640 SF I _ RIM. 1788.45 y p 5 2.5 O Q o o / -------- I F IN a N o / �' / _ A EXISTING 4 WIDE ESMT. PER IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.341 ACRES / 14,880 SF ❑ I INV= (1781.45 /6� 13 � 0�OF SLOPE I = 0 - l I / m CUT O "� OS PROP. pECOMPOSEDo / �1 // 0 ` / BK. 1982, PAGE 139, O.R. PERVIOUS AREA---------1.303 ACRES / 56,760 SF 1 \ \ \ O�.�, �,°c'v �,1'v MAX. 2:1 �,�` �, GRANITE /� I) o o / ONSITE AREA DISTURBED --1.159 ACRES / 50,503 SF, 70.50% I �m CATCa ASIN N O`L �O \ o PROP. 12 DEE / , �" o / / o z _ , Bo- EXISTING 8 WIDE ESMT. PER ' I - - - A 8BB'W\ C �C \ 0,0 O'G ' RAVE PIT 18 793.73 _ - ,/ �N 794.18 / 4.3 j Q; I / o J / \O BK. 8022, PAGE 159, O.R. GROSS SITE AREA-------1.928 ACRES / 83,994 SF O O CUT SLOPE O rn I I \ ® 11NV � \ \ � - - 1L- --- ^ - \ \ =___--�- - -F� - -- ^ � Ij - - - -�- - -- -- OFFSITE I \ \ \ w z > \ 789.18 - -� - - 19Q.50 - 792.02 I 79 .82 - - - 793.43 7 8 794.00/ / e o /o_ - �� _ / ( ) o g - D€COMP-OSED- � FG 289.91 FG 16 �1 F POP. DECOMPOSED FG �� 16 / FG FG / I I - �I 11 PROP. EASEMENTS GROSS OFFSITE AREA-----0.283 ACRES / 12,354 SF I Jai / 78 4 � X BUILDING789.48 - 7$9,92 -7�0 8Q' I 7�2.32 7 3.12 GRANITE 793.73 794.17 794.30 / !'� o J OFFSITE AREA DISTURBED--0.195 ACRES / 8,502 SF, 68.82% 1 I GRANITE �� �f _ _ _ _ _ / PROP. 15 WIDE PRIVATE EQUASTRIAN 1 1 f�� Q J I B �_�_---- F�= - FG -=_ --- FG --- - - FG --------FG== - _�--F� -- FG" / / = - / ' m / Co-TRAIL EASEMENT FOR THE m o TP OF SLOPE - L - �; EX. BUILDING OP OF SLOPE \ / FILL / / - �� / - BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1 & 2 UTILITY CONTACTS MAX. 2:1 -1 79 BUT SC@P - - - - _ - / - _78 .03 - 786.631.0% 786.83 1.0� FD HP - == 1.0%_ LIMITS OF /'� /�5 / / - / o - - - - Q 12 5.2% FL/GB -FL 2' _ _ o o SEWER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT f GRADING _ �s6�52 N N N / x DEDICATION CUT 18 'T �m FL - 25% - - / / 7 / 1 �� / > `� PHONE: (909) 987-2591 / \ \ 3 784.82 2 .67 787 I - rn PROP. ECOMPdSED� / \ �, _ _ - - -5 - - -- 0 787.33 w f' / �5- -- - - - PARCEL A Q I Amy - FL e FG FG - 3 W.33 7-57o J _ 795.00TW / GRA�It7TE / / /�/ / / /1� ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - ► - - �� m . . o ,� cn w / / I i / // / - PHONE: (909) 357-6163 (I EX. AIL B CUT - 3 MAX. ' I� - 791.00TF v� 50 FOOT STRIP OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED - 2:1 SLOPS / / / TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR I. '`` - 1.5 ' - / WATER: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY r 78�'�3 787.33 -_ a O I d- - , _ _ I - _ ___ _-- - , / / / N/ / / / , �� - - ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PHONE: (626) 448-6183 a 9% 1 ��- _ N \ A /tVED DRIVE 790.50TW 15 7 4.515 / �`; / �� / / _\_� - - _ ^ EX. C&G W / 786. _ _ \ \ - -789.00TF' / / 783�OOTF / c� � /' - - - I / / / i / �� , TELEPHONE: VERIZON \ / - PHONE: 909 335 7867 a- _ I \ I , �\ - - - - - \�_ - �� �� -� - - 7- - - / - _ _ _ - - HATCH LEGEND ( ) _ D _ _ w - 787.5 _ , _ LIMITS OF / / / / / r i ' - - - - _ _ GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 1 \ z > 10 786.20 1; 2% 786.80 �(__ �. / /// , _ - - - - \ ;. FS ��\ �\�N o I I \' -1790- - -J' GRADING / / / //// � ' _ _ - - - . - PHONE: (626) 987-2591 �- - - - _ FS \ / UT _ _ - 787.33 �� ' I i I / / ///// _ - - _ - - - - - - - - ACMPAVI G & BASE MAILB ( - - - _ I I - _- � TE = - - �� � w 11 `� \F - .00 '� I I N � IIII �(�//�/// - - - - - - - - - - - CONSTRUCTION NOTES m � •'� � PACED DRIVE - � :� � �� � ��� � / / I I III I 1 / � � � � � _ � - L �- - - - - -- LC NEW AC PAVEMENT s PAD-787.33 "� l I I I I OFFSITE / � // u�- STD UP , B�I$aI5o II I I I I I II / , ,- \ , \ / N ) \ cv U / I - - ' 11% \ I / / I I I I I I I I I I j\/ '' ( �- \ \ BRICK PAVED 1 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EX. AC PAVING AND BASE ao I Q 0 Q 000 19.51 17.5 - 7.5% w -- - - � 7� Qcn Q;� / U �� _ � / / / I IIII 1 L / r\ 12 I� I ''' o \ / I I I I ' PROPERTY 2 CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVING AND BASE r _ ii II co Q II _ : i cn i / / INE NU 787.33 TOP OF 787.33 r I LIMITS OF 1 / - - - - / / / I III I I/ ley l \ I 3�CONSTRUCT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD / FG FG I GRADING / / / l Illl I I/ 11° l - �-I CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4�CONSTRUCT NEW CURB & GUTTER PER CITY STANDARDS 1771.50 0 � q SLOPE - - - - - / / 1 - - ii \\ N <l l//l/ \ INVo - - _ _ _ 5 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN OUTLET PER CITY STD. FL/ 6 S \ o - - - II // EX. LDG zE _ - _ _ 783.40 FILL P P. 12" DEEP I ��--- �/l /l/ l/ l I / I I ��� �I / _ 1 RIM 1Z79.30 _ - - - _ -_ , (DI-CONSTRUCT 1 WATER METER AND METER BOX / \ _ , �� I � \ 783.30 `TOP OF SLOE FG I ° GAVEL PIT j- / - - - _ - /�� I I I I \ GRAVEL „ E E INV= 1771. - �, _ 1 o - - - - - -- -- - _ -178 - -- - - I\ EX. SMH I FG \ - - - - - -- - ,- ___ -- - J/ // / __- _ - I 7�CONSTRUCT 6" PVC SEWER LATERAL / / / \ I -SI x r BUT �l\ \ _ \N - N _ - ---- - -- - 1 _ ___ - -__ _- __ �_�i EX. �i °°°°°°°°°°°10 go-REMOVE EXISTING TREES W EX.-WV`� \ - -_ - _ - - DECOMPOSED GRANITE IRRIGATION METER 1 d01N T�EX. GRADE _ - _ - - - - - _ -- �- m- __ _ - - I IN T$ E -G I g REMOVE EXISTING _ I - - �-� _ -� -_- - - -__ - __ - - _ - - -- - - EX. AC PAVING - - I I 10 REMOVE EXISTING SIGNS i 5Q.00 _ II - - - - - - - - ,- - - J - - - _ 290:06 ___-- �`�� I \�;��;��;��;��,`\�;�� EARTH FILL OR CUT (77 TC I �� � o _ - - - - - - - - -_- -_ ��� - - yam- - - - _��0_@>���--�- �� 11 REMOVE EXISTING MAIL BOX m - ��r, - - -- - - _ - - - _ - - _ EX. PCC RB 12 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD (777 1)FL I o ooao� - - �- - - - _ - - _ 1775-- - - - -_ , /�- �_�--_ - -- - - - - i � � yi fir=- /ri "1 / �/ / I o I JOIN X. C&G I � - - - - - - - _ � ' /�'-� I� _ - - - I BLK & RET/WALLS 13 INSTALL LED STREET LIGHTS PER SCE's LIGHTING STANDARDS �-' I I % l / / - ' -' / // / I I�ARKINIGS CL C I I CUT OF FILL ONSITE ¢ / / �( O w y � - - - -' �� GRASS / VLIZ / it r p o� Z PA KINGS - / 11 EX. SIGN I- - / I /� ? / � ' l / ZONE - - - I /� D m � I I SLOPE SYMBOL / / _ CONSTRUCT 4 MAX. HIGH BLOCK RETAINING WALL \ \ \ I l X X I ��'/ �� - I I AND 6 HIGH BLOCKWALL W �� II /-� r , ��'N. 1074- -01 -0-000 - I I Gra1p1111C Scale 16 CONSTRUCT 4" THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE IN EQUASTRIAN TRAIL / flCKWALL Y \ i \ -CONSTRUCT �1AX. 4 HIGH BLOCK RETAININ -AND 6- - - - \ 20 0 10 20 40 17 CONSTRUCT BRICK PAVED DRIVEWAY PER ARCHITECT'S PLAN / I I z� I / i \ I \ o / / \ ��� -1 ( I \ 18 CONSTRUCT 10' X 20' X 12" DEEP GRAVEL PIT �Ir I W `` / / / / I / II / I I \ ( In Feet ) 19 PROTECT IN PLACE EX. BLOCK RETAINING WALL _ I � I / �� , - I 1 0 GRASS / I / / \ ��` =�J I I , / / / / I I - - - _ - - - - - - - - ► I 1 inch = 20 ft. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 20 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE DOWN DRAIN 36 / I / I I I I \ o E LT. / / I / f I - I I / / - CUT - 1870 CY N �� / I I I� �--� I I � /�� I EX. F / / I / I / - - - - - - -II I I - - ---- - - - - - - ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ON-SITE TO BE REMOVED t I I I I I�� / / ( - - - - - + I FILL = 565 CY (CONC. SLABS, WALLS, FENCES, ASPHALT PAVING, WATER I it I i / _ /I \ �ll - - - / ' I II \III II II II \\ I WELL, WATER PUMP, TREES, TELEPHONE POLES, BUILDINGS) _ - _ _ GRASS I I I - _ - - � L�L \ I I - - - - ---- - - _ \ r I III - _ / - �- - + - d vv v ` v 1770- SHEET 1 OF 3 L---- I / III - - / / II - / - - - - - - �_ Erl \ \\ - - - ��- i �\ \� �� _��/ ENGINEER OF WORK - - I ST. � SPB ENGINEERING, INC. QR ti TUSTIN, CA. 92780 � � Q -9cG� - PHONE (714) 931-0912 � 3 `!' � =X /� / / I \ -I_ I I I l / L L \ \ w No. 66815 r , / I � EX.P. 9.30.22 I \ \ n PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: �S CIVIL Q � � � iil ill I T TEQF CAL�F� \ ado 07.14.22 MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES DATE WI LSON AVENUE OWNER & DEVELOPER S/W COR. SEC. 23, ARCHIBALD AVENUE LLC PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN T.1.N, R. 7 W. 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 20297 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH CELL PHONE: (626) 224-4636 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 N'LY PL C PROP. 4' MAX. HIGH BLK/RE/WALL I II AND 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL II 806 TRAOIL EASEMENT IDE PFOR THE RIVATE QUASTRIAN �15� PARCEL 2 26' EX. BLDG. 806 II (FF=803.94) 804 804 BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1 & 2 LOT LINE PROPOSED 2—STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 800.00TW ____ S LY PL PARCEL 1 802 "' 1 — I 7.5' 7.5' - 3' BENC 795.00TF — soo '� 30 U- FF = 797.70 � sot 798 J PAD = 797.03 — j EX. BLK/WALL 19 898 I � 0 2 — - - - - - - - - - - - -5%—CUTJr 796 2 BENCH Q PROP. 2' WIDE 796 794 1 PROPOSED 2—STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 22' `� EX. GRADE 211 FILL _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — t — — I CONC. DRAIN 20 1 � — — — X. GRADE PROP. 794 792 I PROP. 4' MAX. HIGH BLK/RE/WALL ,� — — BLK RET WALL 15 792 FF = 788.00 ^ — — 4% CUT CUT 2:1 / / 790 I AND 6 HIGH BLOCKWALL 3 BENC = EX. GRADE — — — — oo ,y 2" — MAX. SLOPE 1 790 788 PAD 787.33 _ — — CUT 5� � 1 v 12 XTRA DEEP 1 788 786 EX. 6' HIGH JOIN TO EX. GRADE­,, PROP. GRADE _ _ — — — — —� 16 FOOTING I 23%- - - - —- - - - — - - - - - - - - - 784 WOOD FENCE EX. GRADE — — �� �� FILL Li CUT 2:1 784 782 782.20TW CST 1��� MAX. SLOPE 782 780 778.20TF 780 PROP. BLK. 1" CLR. 778 15 RET/WALL SECTION A—A 778 776 EX. GRADE 1 776 774 / 1 SCALE: H & V 1"=10' 774 772 _ — 772 770 770 CO N'LY PL PROP. 14' WIDE PRIVATE EQUASTRIAN I TRAIL EASEMENT FOR THE 15' 1 BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1 & 2 1 806 806 804 S'LY PL 7.5 LOT LINE 5~ PARCEL 2 PROP. 6 HIGH BLOCKWALL 804 � EX. GRADE 804 J — — 802 800 1 o — 800 798 PAR-C E L 1 N � - - - - - - 2' BENCH � EX. GRADE SHEET FLOW — — _ — 798 796 I JOIN TO ti —71 - - - - - - - 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 796 794 EX. GRADE--,,. 4� 4% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 794 EX. GRADE 792 1 SHEET FLOW 792 790 EX. GRADE _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — 1 790 788 I PROP. 4' MAX. HIGH BLK/RE/WALL _ — — — — — — — — — 1 788 786 rAND 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL , , . — I 786 784 --78+ 782 782 780 776.50TW 780 778 772.50TF SECTION B—13 15 776 PROP. BLK. �4�, 776 774 RET/WALL CLR. SCALE: H & V 1"=10' 774 772 EX. GRADE 772 770 EX. PCC CURB � 770 768 EX. AC PAVING 806 NEW E'LY R/W PROPOSED 2—STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING E'LY PL 804 802 LANDSCAPED AREA 802 800 —14' PARKWAY 12' LANDSCAPES FF = 797.70 ^U M 800 o� L EX. GRADE �EX. GRADE 798 798 CONC. 12' CONC. DRIVE �' PAD — 797.03 '� "' J PROP. 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL 7g6 COVERED PATIO 11%EX. GRADE 11% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — 796 WALK CUT — — — — — — — — — — — _ _ 794 EX. GRAD - -1,0%— - -2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOIN TO 792 —E] — 2%— — — �� PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE \ 794 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE � - - - � 792 788 PROP AC 788 . PROP. PROP. 790 788 SIDEWALK 786 C&G 784 SECTION C—C SCALE: H & V 1"=10' E'LY PL 796 I 796 794 NEW E LY R/W PROPOSED 2—STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 794 792 �14' PARKWAY FF = 788.00 V) M EX. GRADE 792 790 — 00 J EX. GRADE _ _ — — _ _ _ _ _ _ PROP. 4 MAX. HIGH BLK/RE/WALL 790 CONC. 1 786.20 786.80 PAD — 787.33 '� r- `` _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ _ AND 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL I 788 788 LANDSCAPE WALK I g% FS 2% CONC. WALK _ — — — — JOIN TO �1 786 7g6 EX. GRADE FS 787.50FS COVERED PATIO 9.5% _ — — 784 - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - — - - — - - - - - - EX. GRADE � � � 784 780.00TW 782 EX. GRAD 776.00TF 782 — — — — — 2%— �� 1 y CUT EX. GRADE � \ 780 PROP. AC FLOWLINE PROP. GRADE PROP. 780 778 PROP. I SWALE 1" CLR. EX. GRADE 778 776 C&G SIDEWALK 1 — — — 776 SECTION D—D PROP. BLK. - - -.774 I RET WALL 15 772 SCALE: H & V 1"=10' / 0 806 CL/STREET PROP. R/W 8004 S'LYI PL 50' WIDE, TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA--� 800 1 EX. BOUNDARY- FOR ROAD, UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES 1 798 O, I 36' 36 14' 796 PARCEL 1 17'± —5 794 LAND- 1 792 PROP. 4' MAX. HIGH BLK RE WALL 11 EX. GRADE SCAPE 1 1�P� 79O AND 6' HIGH BLOCKWALL / 24 787.33 PROP. _ SHEET 2 OF 3 SAWCUT O PROP. AC 2% MAX. 12 O-'�QF — _ 788 1 PROP. BLK. FG GRADE EX. CONC. EX. AC PAVING 2' ~ PAVING — — S SIDEWALK EX. C&G �— — & JOIN — — — — r— rX ``' "' PROP. GARAGE RET/WALL r — _ _ — ---_ _ y 2.� 786 JOIN TO 3 BENC PROP. CURB PROPOSED I S��,oFq-f 782 WOOD SINCE GH EX. GRADE — — — FF — 783.40 —SEX. GRADE � � ENGINEER OF WORK ®& GUTTER SIDEWALK 780 780.50TW �o° SPB ENGINEERING, INC. Q�oFEssioN 778.50TF PROP. 1`b O ST. ARCHIBALD AVENUE 778 1 CLR. GRADE 1391 WINDEMERE LANE �� \,e qc 776 TUSTIN, CA. 92780 TYPICAL SECTION EX. GRADE _� Fs 774 / I PHONE (714) 931-0912 SCALE: H 1"=10', V 1"=10' 772 — — — � ' SECTION E—E PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: No. 66815 770 SCALE: H & V 1 =10 EX.P. 9.30.22 S� CIVIL �P /1 q�F� AUF�� 07.14.22 F C MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES DATE OWNER & DEVELOPER ARCHIBALD AVENUE, LLC PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 20297 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH CELL PHONE: (626) 224-4636 RANCHO C UC AMO NGA, CA. 91737 - - - - - - - - tx PEACH TREE LN. PROJECT 00 L_ - - - - /!/ / IIII \ o p� / _ - _ - i � � � �� m SITE / l l ll / ` � � � \_ - __�_ ,-✓' --- �� „i �/ -- I / �i� � � /, - -�" /�� WILSON AVE. - / / / \ � \ F I , _ I � I / � �/ - � � _ � i VICINITY MAP NO SCALE h� ��p _ _ i/ I —_—__ - - _ _ _ — - - �/ / / / 11 \ �\ 1 L — -- ---� /� / I \ / l / i I / j j _ _ \/ \ / _ — _ �- 1 17 III LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ _ /// -�\ \ _ THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, - - - -_ _ -- STATE- - - / / // / / - O WW I I \\ I I I I / _ �� I I / \ �j�' - - I / / / \ \ /- �I I /I/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: _ / THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 1 o \ _) / I \\ / / / - / NORTH RANGE 7 WEST SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF \ \) , � RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP OF SAID LAND APPROVED JUNE 20, 1884 BY _ — _ — — 1 / — — \ \ \ \ L - - I / I , _ - - _ / THE SURVEYOR GENERAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: - - - -1800- �I X> \ �03-0-000 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23 THENCE NORTH 00°25'20" X _ APN: 1074— 8 — a EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 280.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF \ \ I I / / / / / /� \ \ 1 \ I X X ❑ �, / // BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°25'20" EAST 247.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH - \ > \ I I EX. BUILDING I w / / 0 1 / / // / / 89°40'59" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE OF \ � W \o \I Ex: C\ Imo' I (FF=1803.94) I f w EX. FLAT GRASS_ AREA / I / / / / 340.00 FEET THENCE SOUTH 00°25'20" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE 257.06 w I ❑ °t B / , ❑ ❑ o Q �, VLR I §i �,0 / / / / // / / FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°40'59" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE 340.00 FEET \ w w� w \\ �� \ \ �� I I J�1<ENQ�D AREA'S ZONE N ��/ / /� �- // / �'\�� I °� / TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I X i/ I\ \\ \ \ — \ \� I x — - - - - - `-_ _- - - - - W m - - - _ �/ / 1i APN: 1074-181-02-0-000 7 � � - - --_ - J » - _ / _ �� I \ \ ( y � - - i IKI - - - - - 4 HIGH FENCE �_ - / _ - - - - - \ \ / \ EX. PP\ ( \�( \\ � -_ / 1 �0 3=HIGHS R AL 891!39 a E / J 4Q.00- -E)f 4' 1 - - - - - - __ _ _ _ 4- / - - - \ \��9s Ex. � �Bo \� \ �Y� , ri � `' , � - � - _ - _ - - - - - /� �� -� — — , , � \ \ �' BENCH MARK - —-_- -- - �� - �� i \ 1 I 2 BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED CITY OF RANCHO _ _ I \ \ \ ` - \ 1 CUCAMONGA BM 10105 1987 AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD _ - _ - _ Y I \ -'c —` � 2 _ _ AVE. AND HILLSIDE RD. 3 FT. NORTH OF BEGINNING OF CURB RETURN. EX. C&�� EX. SIGN II \ \� � !� - - - _ \ \ � � \� - - - - ' � / IRON // EX. WADER �� ,/ r i% _= - - - - _- -_-_ \ \\ - // / � I BENCH MARK NO: 10105 \ -I I , - I ELEVATION: 1864.770 (ADD 1000.00 TO NEW ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN) SHED - - - �UK/WELL ADJUSTMENT YEAR: 1987 �� =AC PAVED DRIVE \ \ _ / �- - - -� AC DRIVE \ I `, > �\— ❑ - - - �/ / z /' i ////// \\� �\ /I SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY -- vY \ \ \ / \ / i / / // - � THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS PER AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY w EX. IRR)'G. �3 \ \ ' � , _ 1 - 1 / / I / // // _ PERFORMED BY SPB ENGINEERING, INC. ON MARCH 28, 2020. w \METER �� I 1 \ `� i I - I \ / / I / / // ��T`'�i , - TOPOGRAPHY MAP UPDATED JULY 2nd, 2021. vY ( / NOTE: I I I I l I X \ \ } � _ _ / / / / /� - / / / / / / ALL ONSITE FEATURES HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED w �\ \\ 1 \ T `��� � �� I J \ - - - - / / / / \ _ // / / / / AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE PER DEMOLITION 1 I i \ �i,�_�� ` i / O PERMIT NO. PMT2020 00707 I- J I I c� \Ex 12" TREE \ \\ // - \\ J / ` I \ // / // O/ O \ O I I _ \ �- \ \ \ - - - EX. WATER II I I I / IIII / /I I _ N �X. 12" TEE \ \ II / I O I WELL _ // I I I I II I LEGEND ❑ � I 1 \ 1 \ /� II VLR � \ I � O 36 - \ X. )2" EE\ - \\ 1 \\ \ - - - - _ � I l // // I / O I 11-1�-/ / --S--- ------ EXISTING SEWER / / ZONE / I / ) \�1�g � , -- - / // / I ON - I I I / / l/ --W--- ------ EXISTING WATER 4�1 \ \ S - - \ - - -I --G--- ------ EXISTING GAS - - -- - - - - - - - - - - � I �` ❑ I f tX.�SI N �n->\ \ 4 \ '_1 - -1795- - -- / ------ --- x / --- EXISTING FEATURES I C&G \ l 40 �� \ ` - - - - \ \ I �� �' , - - / I O / ----- ------ EXISTING CENTERLINE \ NOTE: \ TEMP PP / O ------ EXISTING BOUNDARY E . SMH � \ i I � \ \ i � � I I --RIM= 1788.4 i\ �l,I I \ ° i' I I I _� \ \ \ \ EX. TEMP PP ALL ONSITE FEATURES HAVE BEEN DEl�ty OLIS�HED I / I / / / — ------ PROPOSED LOT LINE ❑ If�V�(1\81'4 ) i \ \ I \ \ AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE PER DEMOLITION- I /- - - - �' � � � ' ' / - CB ------ EXISTING CATCH BASIN I �I I \\ \ x \ \ \ PERMIT NO. PMT2020-00707 \ I� o 00 LT ------ EXISTING ON-SITE LIGHT \X 24" TREE > \ Q / i l to / _ HC ------ EXISTING HANDICAP I f i \ \ �� _ - �/ / �0 FL ------ EXISTING FLOWLINE �4"TREE S - ° \l \ _ \ _ - - - - - - - - / / , cu\/I/ / _ �� _� - - CL ------ EXISTING CENTERLINE — — I �\ - - - SMH - EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE CY) w \ \ \ _ \ WV ------ EXISTING WATER VALVE I E�(.\T P. F INCE I J \ 1\ EX. BUILDING - - ' ' \ \ / / �Z �1 �- ST.LT. ------ EXISTING STREET LIGHT � \ - - C) LiY \ \ -- - _ - _ / / _ ST ------ EXISTING STREET \ \ -1790-- - -EX. BUILDING I / / / / // zi - -� / � � = z \ I 1 - 1 - - / / / / - - FH ------ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT < I 8S� i I\ \ \ - _ \ _ _ / _ FF ------ EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE \ i W \ \ I \ \ \\ � � _ - - - , \ - -/ - - - - - - - - - - _ � � / / / / / / / �� i� 1 � SL ------ SEWER LATERAL - -EX-. CON C-SLAB- _ \ \� \ _ — - / x.-MAIL BOX \ \ I I I _ _ _ J — — _ // / // //// / / // // / _ — EX. EASEMENTS _ \ _ _ _ Ao- EXISTING 4 WIDE ESMT. PER AC PAVED DRIVE / / p , \ -� \ 1 - - - ' _- _ / / / / / / �06 PAVED V - - - - - - BK. 1982, PAGE 139, O.R. EXISTING 8' WIDE ESMT. PER - - - - - - - - - - - - - BK. 8022, PAGE 159, O.R. EX. SIN -n \ - - - - - - - - _ -�� // / / / / X. 24"T,EE r I � _ I yi 1790- - / / / _ _ - � _ CONC. SLAB - _ AC PAVED DRIVE 1, I / \ \ EX. AC DRIVE\, EX. BUILDING --(FF=1788.50) � � � / \�J \E� "TREE• - - � r - - - _ , ��o\ = ��,t-� ; �Jl _ ^-- �1v1- 1779.30 / f\ INV= 7�30 � I \ � � � -_- � - _ _ � — — -J _ /���� - _-__ ��"�J II // -� I EX. BLDG I \ EX. SMH EX. REFLE TOR \ \ _ - =T7 - - - ;— - __ %_ ; J L - - ^� SIGNS =� \ 1�1 \\ � � � � � � - - - --- - - - - - - - - ---- _ - = � _ � // / - - - --�- � / \ _ - � _ % _ �i � EX. PCC CURB W_ \ X \\ \ - _ _ _ -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ice - �__; E 6T1-II>;ACt ' / �/ -:77 - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - -_-_- - - - -- --_---__�_ -_- __ -_ - - - J- -EX. AC PAVING I _ ( *59039, < EX. PP \ T� - _ - - - - - - HtG"OOD-fENCE- - - T -, 1780-\ - - - - — _ - =---- PARKINGS I 1775----- -- - - _-_- EX. PCC C�1RB_ - - - I L / / / \ o ❑ — \� - - � 1 f06 I \ / ( J I / _ �4 / VLR � � P NG�GS P RKINGS ❑ / / / �� _ � GRASS / I �I'� Ex. SIG I - / / ,\ / / ZONE / I I s . L . w ��I I / �/ APN: 1074-18 �b1 -0-000 — J I I � --�r � — � �� 1/ I Graphic Scale 20 0 10 20 40 .36 In Feet ) \ ❑Ir w GRASS / I / // ��� _�` 1 inch = 20 ft. C I I I I I 00 EX. ST. N � ` 1 / / I I / I� �= L=� I I OWNER & DEVELOPER EX.I H ,I/ / / I / f �\ � - - - � _ _ -II I I IL - -- -- -- - -r-- - ARCHIBALD AVENUE, LLC 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 I IIII h I GRASS I - - - - I \ �_ \ CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH I I I , I - I � L�J � I 1 \ - - - - - \ - CELL PHONE: (626) 224-4636 SHEET 3 OF 3 L---- I I / III - I / / I II =_ - - - - - _ - - - - I \ \\� �� 1770- - ENGINEER OF WORK 1 / / IIII ll /� \� I �� II I o'/ I // I - ❑ - - - _ - - - - - - I - - - �_ � 1\ \ \\ � _ _ / SPB ENGINEERING, INC. �aQR ST. / ,� ❑ - - - - - -❑ _ _ - - - - - - - _ - _C /� TUSTIN 1391 NDAM92780ERE ANE e 9cG �� / 1 _ _ \ I ❑ �Y Q 2 1'�0- C s - / \�\- PHONE (714) 931-0912 - � rj - - _ \ _ w � No. 66815 j� \ 1 \\ PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: � EX.P. 9.30.22 � -- — S CIVIL �P s � —X M� l lI \ � _ _ , — I \ I I l / LJ \ T - - -- / 12.06.21 MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES DATE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WI LS O N AVENUE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 20297 — — — — — S/W COR. SEC. 23, 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE I T.1.N, R. 7 W. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 i OWNER HILLSIDE ROAD � -� o� _ _ _ ,� - - ' � l l l l I I o DIRT 1 $po— c' ARCHIBALD AVENUE, LLC > PEACH - LEGEND 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE Q TREE LN. _ _ — — ____ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 < PROJECT o 1 - - i � � --S--- -- EXISTING SEWER m SITE � ' /h/ T �J\�� ✓ -- - - �� �' �� // --W--- ------ EXISTING WATER CONTACT PERSON: Mr. LAKHBIR SONDH w - j 1 �� I - / CELL PHONE: 626 224-4636 Q o 0 - --G--- ------ EXISTING GAS ( ) J - - CONC I I / l l \� \ / J \ DIRT PILE _ �/ �� �\ I�/ - - ------ EXISTING FEATURES a � ' ��� / / -- EXISTING CENTERLINE PROJECT ADDRESS WILSON AVE. / / / / / / / / / / I - \ \ - ' ' 'I� - - - _ I I / \ \ I I / / ✓� /v / / 1 1 / - _ - _/� - I / ------ EXISTING BOUNDARY / EX. SINGLE FAMILY II ------ PROPOSED LOT LINE 5647 ARCHIBALD AVENUE VICINITY MAP I RESIDENCE J Ij ( ��` II 1 �'�� �/ _ — / , -I BOO-_ _ , — _ I I _ _ / CB ______ EXISTING CATCH BASIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 NO SCALE 17 1� LT EXISTING ON-SITE LIGHT / X 0 \ HC ______ EXISTING HANDICAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION >� C -�' I /�� ,� I , // , - 1\ I I I/zz FL EXISTING FLOWLINE \ I I I / i�� i \ �\ /- CL ------ EXISTING CENTERLINE ______ THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, � o I / / // r L _ SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Bo5 , CONC ( � — �- — — -/� \ � — — / I / I I \ / / _ /' WV ------ EXISTING WATER VALVE - - 1 / / I I ` \\ 1 I I ST.LT. ------ EXISTING STREET LIGHT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 1 � 'Q��� C&G ------ EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF I \ I BRUSH - ______ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, _ _\ _ \ _LIB CONC / / I , -�- _ / _ ST EXISTING STREET ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP OF SAID LAND APPROVED JUNE 20, 1884 BY n rt 1 I I �_�� _ _ - - / \�l- ' � FH ______ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT THE SURVEYOR GENERAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: \ I I APN: 1074 1 03 0 000 , / / / / / FF EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE „ �ONC II I I I X�- X ❑ DIRT / // / o / // // / / BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 00°25 20 - l EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 280.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF \ \ \ I\\ \ \ I II I I I vLR i� l I l // // �/ // /00 DIRT BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°25'20" EAST 247.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH DIRT \` \ / _ \ \ I �� I I �� / / / / / / 1 89°40'59" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE OF \\ ZONE /��� // // / � I i/ 340.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°25'20" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE 257.06 / / �` i \ \ \ \ I I I �� / / / / �� _� i FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°40'59" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE 340.00 FEET ,, - -- -X-,- - - - -� ! - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _- __ , - �—� / � TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. � 'I --N-89°3914 E 340`:( — — ,- - - — \- - - - - - - -- - --- - - - - - - ' �� �� / _�� I �' APN: 1074-181-02-0-000 7, \ PP I -- - - —� - - - / — \ J I UTILITY CONTACTS �,` �-____ � � \ �I , I � \ �\ B \ \ � - - - - ' ' EX. 8', WIDE ESMT. PER �/ I ��� - - -1790- - - - \ $ WIDE ESMT. PER 0 I - - - - ` `�_� // SEWER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ - -- BK."8022, PAGE 159, O.R: �� - --_ - ////i \\ - - I PHONE: (909) 987-2591 J 11R. BK. 8022, PAGE 159, O.R ,fig � - - _ - \\ V � Q ' I � � ' ;"✓� \ `� - _ \ _ J/ /� � �/ / //�/ ���� I ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON _ - \ AlA H PHONE: (909) 357-6163 WATER: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY PHONE: (626) 448-6183 \V - /Ill /\ TELEPHONE: VERIZON \ \ ` � / I I / / / - / PHONE: 909) 335-7867 � � \ � ` � - - � l I l IIl � - - - - , \ / / � I \ „0 I 00 ( / / — _ / / / / / GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY I I I I ` C,4 I / //// // // / / / / // PHONE: (626) 987-2591 l DIRT J 11 I I I\ GENERAL NOTES O I I I EXISTING ZONE----------VL Q �� N \ - PARCEL 2 I I I ICI I , - - \ \ , o ` 1 � � � � - - � / I / 1 PROPOSED ZONE--------VL 1 p - \ \ \ 0.824 ACRES / 35,878 SF GROSS & NET O I \ \ > _ _ - - - - _ EXISTING USE----------SINGLE LOT W/2 DWELLINGS I \ \ \ - i // J I / I 1 / / / PROPOSED USE---------2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 6.`4' WIDE ESMT. PER Q 9S, - - - - - - -- - -- _ - - / NO. OF NUMBERED PARCELS -------2 (TWO) _ _ I ROCK I� I \ \ 1982, PAGE 139, O.R. ` \ I\ � �( , _ /� / I — 1 Q / N0. OF LETTERED PARCELS -------1 (ONE) PROP. CONS. SIDEWALK � � � � � � _ / � / - ' \ I � AREA----------------GROSS = 1.928 ACRES I 1 < I I NET = 1.644 ACRES EX. SMH � I \ / � � \ � � i / _ 0 RIND (1788. 5 smh-rim/ \ J I \ \ / / PARCEL 1-------------0.821 ACRES / 35,762 SF GROSS & NET / PARCEL 2-------------0.824 ACRES / 35,878 SF GROSS & NET o , PARCEL 'A-------------0.283 ACRES / 12,353 SF \\ _ - - - - / I _ / \� ��`' - _ ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.---1074-181-02-0-000 I \ �, �\ _ — cam/ , — I / \ N89 35 29 W 289.97 [_10$ �— 1 p � �u w — , _ - _ / / �' — BENCH MARK I v 1 f `� \ Q o \ w I N - - _ - - - _ ;n / / / / _ - /�� _ 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED "CITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA BM 10105 J ' I z �I \c¢a I o' 1790 - / �' / / // - - - - - 1987" AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HILLSIDE ROAD 3 FT. u) / / / / _ o _ -- --- \ / ° 05 CURB RETURN. z - - - - - - - - - / / / / / / �� i ' 1 BEONCH MARK NRTH OF INONIN0G1 OF / / / / / z , / / �1-1 5 ADJUSTMENT YEAR: 1987 ELEVATION: 1864.770 ck:— \ \ _ / / / /04 � i I - ' - - - - , / / / / / / �< �T _ , r� SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS PER AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED J BY SPB ENGINEERING, INC. ON MARCH 28, 2020. � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � � � � � � � - - - - - - / /\ i ////// � , ; � � ; _ — � _ — EX. EASEMENTS - _ / I\ / I I / ( ////// _ - - Ao- EXISTING 4' WIDE ESMT. PER BK. 1982, PAGE 139, O.R. - - - - - - - - -� DIRT i EXISTING 8' WIDE ESMT. PER BK. 8022 PAGE 159 O.R. CONC PARCEL 1 - - IIII /I I , I I I I I / / \; a , � / III II III / � � �0) � / I I 0.821 ACRES / 35,762 SF GROSS & NET CONC / PROP. EASEMENTS �� � - \ 1 Il \- - - - _ , � / / / l lll�/ IlI ll�l / - / I PROP. 15' WIDE PRIVATE EQUASTRIAN - - - - - - _ _ _ -/ / // /l <lll�l/ w r - _ �- -1770- - - / Co-TRAIL EASEMENT FOR THE I EX. 4'\MDE�ESMT:-PER ® - - - - - - - - - _ _ ___ - - )II// / // // I �- BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1 & 2 ASPH / / - - Q I `\ BK. 1 82 PAGE 139, O.R. i � '� - _____,==,/JJI11 11 I I I/ I X. BLDG I )I / EX. _&mH - - J \ RIM- (17 3 snag rim \ I I _ _ - - -- _ , - -1785— , -_ , —� _— — — __ —, — — — DEDICATION MINTER S T.i / I PRO . CONC. SIDEWALK. - - _ _ _ - - - _ - _- - -- _ it 111 l --- - _ INV= 1771.30 � I / ( ) —v - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / LLJ ARCHIBALD AVENUE _ _ - - - - - - - PARCEL 'A' J �i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — — — — i — / - - - - - — — - - - - - - — — - - II _-- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _�_ -_ _ _ z_ 50 FOOT STRIP OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED T / I ` — nd ��, _ _ — _ — — — — — —, — — — _ — —_� _ _ __— __ — — I Graphic Scale TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR - I '_ � - -� -�� - � � � I m ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ % - - _ - - - _ ASPH _ - I 20 0 10 20 40 ` D III ' _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _`�- - ' I - - - \/cow / I ` of I� V _ - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - --� /' I � � — , - ---—�— II II I C In Feet ) / �� — // / TREES 1 inch 20 ft. CL/STREET PROP. R/W 1 1 \\ w l EX. SIG , i - - J50 WIDE, TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w - �� I I EX. BOUNDARY FOR ROAD, UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES , — 'APN: 1074-1'81 -01 -0-000 1 I/ — — /)I 0' 36 36 14 CD 0 ��II o / / / �' / VLR i II i' _ \ III \ - 12 I III I _j III w / / / i / / I - - /- I I I I \ EX. GRADE LAND- ZONE ZONE �_ ASPH - SCAPE / /�� �- � PROP. AC ti• EX. CONC. EX. AC PAVING SAWCUT 2' O2 PAVING 2% MAX. - 2.7 S� SIDEWA�K ) EX. C&G - - - - - �- - - -\ & JOIN - - - - - 27 L (1 of ' I / / / I I I I // \ \ I- _ - - - - - - - 1- � � � ( I �- - - - - - PROPOSED. . � EX. .-VT. � / / / I I / �� L � �`I I PROP. CURB F I � - - - -- - - - -� - - - ®& GUTTER SIDEWALK — I IIII I _ 11 EX. FH �� / I I 1 - - — — — - - — - - — — \III 1 I II / — , I �I 1 / � I � z I I I 1 ARCHIBALD AVENUE I @left arrov� I I I 1 \ \ _ \ \\ � � � Q _ - - - — - - _ — _ , ," - I 1 \ ��� C - - TYPICAL SECTION — �- �C�en� pkg st�T — IIII O\ \ � - I � i� / I I / - - - _ - � � � � `� III \ \ \\ - - \ SCALE: H 1"=10', V 1"=10' --- - - - — — - —I \ `�\ � � 1770 �o ��� I C - - - - - - -_ — C - - - - - - -_ — _ _ � � ��— \�I — J — C ENGINEER OF WORK — �—\� �oFEssioN O- - - 1765- - — (� _ \ \ - SPB ENGINEERING, INC. sr. I \ \ 1391 WINDEMERE LANE C_ - 1 — TUSTIN, CA. 92780 s TREES I \ \ ) �EX.P. 9.30122 - - -X PHONE (714 931-0912 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: s� CIVIL �P q�EOF CA��F�� WI LSON AVENUE n -� - - - - - 1.Qi1.f est r_• 12.07.21 S/W COR. SEC. 23, T.1.N, R. 7 W. MICHAEL P. ST. JACQUES RCE 66815 DATE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO . 20297 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS November 1, 2022 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407 — DESIGN CONCEPTS —A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels to develop two 2-story single-family residences with attached garages in the Very Low (VL) Zone in the Hillside Overlay located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181-02. Related Records: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Site Characteristics: The 1.93-acre vacant project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue. The property's dimensions are approximately 290 feet in width along the north and south property lines and 247 feet along the east and west property lines. The downslope lot has an elevation of 1,800 feet as measured at the north property line and 1,781 feet along the south property line, for a total grade change of 19 feet. The street improvements have not been installed along Archibald Avenue. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Project Overview: The applicant proposes subdividing 1.93 gross acres of land into two parcels (Parcel #1 - 35,878 and Parcel #2 - 35,762 square feet) to construct two 2-story single-family residences. The proposed residence on Parcel #1 is 6,583 square feet with a 1,265 square foot 6-car attached garage; the proposed residence on Parcel #2 is 7,755 square feet with two 2-car garages totaling 968 square feet. Architecture: The proposed residences have a Mediterranean architectural design theme, which includes a Spanish tile roof, stucco finish, cast stone window and door surrounds and wrought iron railings along with wood garage doors. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of second-story decks. The residences will be painted earth tone colors, as recommended in the Hillside Design Guidelines, and will be in keeping with the residences in the surrounding area, which include a variety of architectural styles and themes. The proposed single-family residences meet or exceed all applicable technical development standards for the Very Low (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay as shown in the table below: Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407 — DESIGN CONCEPTS November 1, 2022 Page 2 Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Building Height 30 Feet 30 Feet YES Parcel 1 - 52 Feet Front Setback Parcel 2 - 52 Feet 42 feet (+/- 5 feet) YES Parcel 1 —23/37 Feet Side Setbacks 10/15 Feet YES Parcel 2 —25/25 Feet Parcel 1 - 152 Feet Rear Setback 60 Feet YES Parcel 2 - 143 Feet Excavation Less than 5 Feet 5 Feet YES Retaining Walls 4 Feet 4 Feet YES Free Standing 8 feet 6 feet NO* Walls Parcel 1 — 15.8% Lot Coverage 25 Percent YES Parcel 2 — 17.5% *The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception for wall height Hillside Overlay Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay, which seeks to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a cross-slope lot with an elevation change of approximately 19 feet from the north to south property lines. The proposed grading requires a cut of 1,870 cubic yards and a fill of 565 cubic yards. Maximum cut or fill is less than 5 feet at any point on the project site, which is below the threshold for requiring Planning Commission review. A combination 4-foot retaining/6-foot freestanding wall is required along the south and east property lines of Parcel #1 due to a grade change between the project site and the adjacent church. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception application (DRC2022-00340) which permits an up to 2-foot increase in the permitted wall height. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot-high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north- south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: 0 Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407 — DESIGN CONCEPTS November 1, 2022 Page 3 ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. El Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Project Site Location Map Exhibit B: Compete Set of Plans WCITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Design Review Committee Meeting Rains Conference Room Meeting Agenda November 1 , 2022 DRAFT MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on November 1, 2022. The meeting was called to order by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 7:00 p.m. Design Review Committee members present: Diane Williams, Tony Morales Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner B. Public Communications Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and, after noting there were no public comments, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2022. Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Project Review Items D1. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407— DESIGN CONCEPTS—A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels and the design review of two 2-story single family residences with attached garages in the Very Low (VL) Zoning Area and the Hillside Overlay District located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074- 181-02. Related Records: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297 and Minor Exception DRC2022- 00340. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 — Minor Land Divisions. The Committee took the following action: The Design Review Committee recommended that the project be moved forward to the Planning Commission as presented for review and final determination. Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote E. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes — November 1, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Draft TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS November 9, 2022 5:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297 — DESIGN CONCEPTS — A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels to develop two single-family residences in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone within the Hillside Overlay located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181-02. Related Records: Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. The project qualifies as a Class 4 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 — Minor Land Divisions. Site Characteristics: The 1.93-acre vacant project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue. The property's dimensions are approximately 290 feet in width along the north and south property lines and 247 feet along the east and west property lines. The downslope lot has an elevation of 1,800 feet as measured at the north property line and 1,781 feet along the south property line, for a total grade change of 19 feet. The street improvements have not been installed along Archibald Avenue. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Residential North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Residential South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Residential East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Residential West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Residential Project Overview: The applicant proposes subdividing 1.93 gross acres of land into two parcels (35,878 and 35,762 square feet) to construct two single-family residences. The proposed lots will be accessed directly from Archibald Avenue. Each parcel complies with the development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential Zone and the Hillside Overlay District. A combination 4-foot retaining/6-foot freestanding wall is required along the south and east property lines due to a grade change between the project site and the adjacent church property. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception application (DRC2022-00340)which permits an up to 2-foot increase in the permitted wall height. This would result in a combination wall, as seen from the neighboring properties, with a height of up to 10 feet. The project site is within the Equestrian Overlay, which necessitates the construction of a 15-foot- wide local feeder trail providing trail access to each parcel. A 15-foot-wide trail is proposed between Parcels #1 and #2 providing direct access from Archibald Avenue. Neither the single- family residence to the north nor the church to the east and south includes trail easements on their respective properties. Therefore, any trail connection from the subject project site with these properties would be limited and practically non-functional for the foreseeable future. Due to the grade difference between the project site and the adjacent church to the south and east (greater than 5 feet), it is not practical to provide an equestrian trail easement around the perimeter of the project site. The trail easement will be separated from the yard areas of the adjacent lots by a decorative 6-foot-high block wall and will include a 4-inch cover of decomposed granite. The equestrian trail will include required access gates and equestrian step-throughs in compliance with City standards. Each lot is designed to accommodate a 24-foot by 24-foot flat corral area that is a minimum of 70 feet from the existing residence on the parcel to the north and Exhibit D TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297 — DESIGN CONCEPTS November 9, 2022 Page 2 the proposed building pad on the adjacent parcel. Staff Comments: Staff is in support of the proposed equestrian trail alignment for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT20297, which provides local feeder trail access from Archibald Avenue to the side yard area of each of the proposed parcels. Due to the grade difference between the project site and the adjacent church to the south and east (greater than 5 feet) it is not practical to provide an equestrian trail easement around the perimeter of the project site. The plans on file show a hypothetical location for a 24-foot by 24-foot corral location on each lot that is a minimum of 70 feet from a residence on an adjacent lot. Each lot will also include an access gate to the equestrian trail along with the required trail gates, equestrian step-throughs, and a 4-inch cover of decomposed granite as required by City standards. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee consider the multi- purpose trails (layout, design/technical details, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Director/Planning Commission: ❑x Recommend Approval of the multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant; or ❑Recommend Denial of the multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant; or ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the multi-purpose trails by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission; or ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the multi-purpose trails by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission; or ❑Recommend Denial of the multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant. Trails Advisory Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit A- Complete set of Plans CITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda November 9, 2022 DRAFT MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5:00 P.M. A. Call to Order @ 6:00p.m. The meeting of the Trails Advisory Committee meeting was held on November 9, 2022. The meeting was called to order by Sean McPherson at 5:00pm. Committee Members present: Al Boling, Tom Tisler and Judith Brennan. Absent: James Daniels. Trails Advisory Committee Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Acting Principal Planner. Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Sean McPherson opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 8t", 2021. Motion carried 3-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Discussion Items D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297— DESIGN CONCEPTS—A request to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into two parcels to develop two single-family residences in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone within the Hillside Overlay located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181-02. Related Records: Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. The project qualifies as a Class 4 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 — Minor Land Divisions. The Committee recommended that the proposed two lot subdivision move forward to the full Planning Commission with the following Conditions of Approval: 1. Add a minimum 36-inch equestrian passthrough at the westerly access to the private equestrian easement. Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes —November 9, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Draft 2. Add a 15-foot section of wrought fence to the proposed east property line wall, at the eastern terminus of the equestrian trail easement, to provide the opportunity for a future trail connection when the adjacent property to the east is redeveloped. E. Identification of Items discussed The Committee Members spent a few minutes talking about general issues, such as public safety. Committee Member Tisler brought up his concern about wishing something could be done to address recent vehicular/pedestrian accidents along the P&E trail. As well, Committee Member Brennan drew staffs attention to an issue where, unfortunately, a horse had to be destroyed after having been hit by a car along Amethyst Avenue north of Wilson. Committee Member Brennan cited a specific segment of a north-south trail between Amethyst and Malachite. This trail can be accessed at Wilson, but as you go northbound, this trail segment is blocked by a wall at Hillside. This causes riders to have to travel northbound on Amethyst, which is where the horse got hit by a car. F. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 5:45pm. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes — November 9, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Draft RESOLUTION NO. 23-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 1.93 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO PARCELS TO DEVELOP TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (VL) ZONE AND THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 240 FEET NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1074-181-02. A. Recitals. 1. Design Concepts filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of February 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on February 22, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The undeveloped 1.93-acre project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; and b. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) C. The proposed subdivision and single-family residences meet or exceed all applicable technical development standards for the Very Low (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay except for wall height as shown in the table below: Exhibit E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-02 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 2 Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Lot Width Parcel 1 — 121 feet 90 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 125 feet Lot Depth Parcel 1 — 290 feet 200 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 290 feet Lot Size Parcel 1 — 35,762 Square Feet 20,000 Square Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 35,878 Square Feet Building Height 30 Feet 30 Feet YES Parcel 1 - 52 Feet Front Setback Parcel 2 - 52 Feet 42 feet (+/- 5 feet) YES Parcel 1 — 23/37 Feet Side Setbacks 10/15 Feet YES Parcel 2 — 25/25 Feet Parcel 1 - 152 Feet Rear Setback 60 Feet YES Parcel 2 - 143 Feet Excavation Less than 5 Feet Cut or Fill 5 Feet YES Retaining Walls 4 Feet 4 Feet YES Free Standing 8 feet 6 feet NO* Walls Parcel 1 — 14.3% Lot Coverage 25 Percent YES Parcel 2 — 16.5% *The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception for wall height d. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2020-00407, for the design of the 2 single-family residences on the subject lots, and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 1.93 acres of land into two lots for the development of 2 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single-family residences with an overall density of .1 to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project has a density of .96 units per acre; and b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City, and C. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistentwith the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-02 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20297 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 3 land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential Zone. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. The project is for the subdivision of 1.93 acres into two parcels of land and the construction of 2 single-family residences in a residential zone. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary I, Matt Marquez, Secretary, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 23-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 1.93 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO PARCELS TO DEVELOP TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (VL) ZONE AND THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 240 FEET NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1074-181-02. A. Recitals. 1. Design Concepts filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2020- 00407, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of February 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on February 22, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The undeveloped 1.93-acre project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; and b. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) C. The proposed subdivision and single-family residences meet or exceed all applicable technical development standards for the Very Low (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay except for wall height as shown in the table below: Exhibit F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-03 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 2 Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Lot Width Parcel 1 — 121 feet 90 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 125 feet Lot Depth Parcel 1 — 290 feet 200 Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 290 feet Lot Size Parcel 1 — 35,762 Square Feet 20,000 Square Feet Yes Parcel 2 — 35,878 Square Feet Building Height 30 Feet 30 Feet YES Parcel 1 - 52 Feet Front Setback Parcel 2 - 52 Feet 42 feet (+/- 5 feet) YES Parcel 1 — 23/37 Feet Side Setbacks 10/15 Feet YES Parcel 2 — 25/25 Feet Parcel 1 - 152 Feet Rear Setback 60 Feet YES Parcel 2 - 143 Feet Excavation Less than 5 Feet Cut or Fill 5 Feet YES Retaining Walls 4 Feet 4 Feet YES Free Standing 8 feet 6 feet NO* Walls Parcel 1 — 14.3% Lot Coverage 25 Percent YES Parcel 2 — 16.5% *The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception for wall height d. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT20337, for the subdivision of 1.93 acres of land in 2 residential lots and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits the development of single-family residences with a maximum density of 2 units per acre. The project is for the development of single-family residences with a density of .96 units per acre; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The project complies with all the requirements of the Development Code except for wall height. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2021-00019)to permit walls up to 8 feet in height; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the requirements of the Development Code except for wall height. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2022-00340)to permit a wall up to 8 feet in height; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-03 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00407 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 3 d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the surrounding area where the site is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low(VL) Residential District. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. The project is for the subdivision of 1.93 acres into two parcels of land and the construction of 2 single-family residences in a residential zone. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with the staff's determination of exemption. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary I, Matt Marquez, Secretary, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 23-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2022-00340, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 2-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (VL)ZONE AND THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 240 FEET NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1074-181-02. A. Recitals. 1. Design Concepts filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2022-00340 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of February 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 22, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The undeveloped 1.93-acre project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; and b. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Residence Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) South Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL East Church Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL West Single-Family Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low VL Exhibit G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-04 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2022-00340 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 2 C. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls)with a height of up to 8 feet along the southern and eastern boundary of the project site; and d. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception for additional wall height will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space; and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions and a Class 3 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures. The project is for the subdivision of 1.93 acres into two parcels of land and the construction of 2 single-family residences in a residential zone. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with the staff's determination of exemption. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-04 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2022-00340 — DESIGN CONCEPTS February 22, 2023 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dobb, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary I, Matt Marquez, Secretary, of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Provide a minimum 36-inch separation between equestrian access bollards at the westerly trail access. 2. Provide a 15-foot section of wrought iron fence in the east property line wall at the terminus of the private equestrian trail to provide the opportunity for a future trail connection when the property to the east is redeveloped. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. Exhibit H www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively "Indemnitees"), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director's actions, the Planning Commission's actions, and/or the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 2 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 12. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 13. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 16. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 17. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 19. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 3 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Parcel 1 & Parcel 2, adjacent to Archibald Avenue, shall irrigate and maintain the parkway along Archibald Avenue. 2. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 3. Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period. 4. Relocate mailbox to N/O property for 5605 Archibald Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44' total feet on Archibald 7. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 8. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 9. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 10. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 11. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Archibald Avenue www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 4 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 14. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 15. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 16. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Services Department Cucamonga Valley Water District 17. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required prior to map recordation and improvements shall be completed and accepted prior to any certificate of occupancy. 18. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. 19. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 5 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Archibald Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with the City "Secondary Arterial" standards as required and include: 1. Sidewalk (property line adjacent) 2. Curb & gutter 3. Driveway approaches 4. Signing and striping as required 5. Street lights as required per the Street Lighting Standard. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. 6. A.C. Pvmt Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 21. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 6 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring . Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 7 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Archibald Avenue Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia hybrid `Muskogee' Common Name: Crape Myrtle Min. Grow Space: 20' o/c. Spacing: to be determined during design Size: 15 gallon minimum Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 24. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 25. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: 26. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 27. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 28. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 29. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 8 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 31. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CRC NFPA 13D and the Current RCFPD Ordinance. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not allow on-site storm water quality treatment BMP devices within the individual single-family lots which will be required to be inspected and maintained by each individual homeowner. As a condition of approval for this single-family residential project (including tentative tract maps and parcel maps, and final tract maps and parcel maps of 2 parcels or more) a common storm water treatment system will be required, which shall be maintained by a homeowners' association prior to the approval of a water quality management plan and issuance of a grading permit. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 9 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee. 12. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 13. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 10 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Engineering Services Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Archibald Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 16. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 19. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 11 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report and storm drain profiles shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 22. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 24. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 27. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 12 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 33. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (or equivalent email) shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 34. The home owners association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 13 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The home owners association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 37. The home owners association (HOA) owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 39. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 14 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 43. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 44. As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots, the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement(s) in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map, the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document. As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 45. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 46. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 15 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 47. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 16 of 17 Project#: DRC2020-00407 Project Name: Archibald Two Location: 5647 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 50. Remove all dirt that was placed on the lots without a permit and recompact to the recommendation of the soils report. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/24/2023 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340 I, , as applicant for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297, Design Review DRC2020-00407 and Minor Exception DRC2022-00340, for property located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 240 feet north of Wilson Avenue; APN: 1074-181-02 Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 22, 2023 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolutions of Approval No. 23-02 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20297; No. 23-03 Design Review DRC2020-00407; and No. 23-04 Minor Exception DRC2022-00340. Exhibit I qw- � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 22, 2023 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Acting Principal Planner David Eoff, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration to: Amend Articles III, IV, V, VIII and IX of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as follows: Amend Street Connectivity Standards In Certain Zones; Modify Detached Accessory Structure Standards; Amend Screening Standards; Revise Standards Related to Automobile Service Stations, Smoke Shops and Height Restrictions for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities; Amend Building Height, Fagade Types, Articulation and Block Sizes In Form-Based Zones; Clarifying Application of Floor Area Ratio Standard; Revising Permitted Building Types in the NE2 Zone; Changes To The Form-Based Zone Land Use Table; Clarify Required Non-Residential Use Intensity in Various Form- Based Zones, and Amend Various Definitions; The City Has Prepared an Addendum To The Certified EIR For The General Plan Update And Climate Action Plan For The Project. This Item Will Be Forwarded To The City Council For Final Action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending the City Council to do the following: 1. Adopt the EIR Addendum 2. Adopt the proposed Development Code Text Amendments BACKGROUND: On December 15, 2021, the City Council adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Council initiated this update process, referred to as PlanRC, to be compliant with changes in state law and to build on our success as a world class community to create a balanced, vibrant and innovative city. This comprehensive General Plan Update addressed issues and challenges facing the City, including diversifying employment opportunities, expanding housing and mobility choice and preserving the character, history, and quality of life that make Rancho Cucamonga a special place to live. The updated General Plan advances the City's vision for a sustainable, resilient, equitable and healthy community. Page 1 On May 18, 2022, the City Council adopted the updated Development Code for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The goals of the Development Code update were to codify the community's vision as established in the General Plan update process, increase certainty in the development review process, and facilitate implementation of key General Plan concepts related to land use and urban design. Since the updated Development Code has been in effect, certain clean-up and clarifying amendments have been identified which need to be made in order to better calibrate the Development Code to the vision of the General Plan, to have clearer standards and procedures, and to expedite development application processes. On December 13, 2023, Planning and Economic Development staff presented "Phase I" of these clean-up and clarifying amendments to the Planning Commission at which point the Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the recommended amendments which that body did on January 18, 2023. This action also included amendments to the Zoning Map and General Plan Land Map. As has previously been described to the Commission, the Development Code and General Plan are living documents in that they are intended to change over time to reflect the evolving complexity of the development review process. Further, the Commission will recall that staff will be proposing a series of changes to continually calibrate the development code to effectuate the general plan's long-range vision throughout 2023. Thus, staff is now proposing a second phase of development code amendments, with the expectation that additional amendments may be forthcoming later in 2023. ANALYSIS: For this second phase of amendments, the Development Code text amendments consist of various technical amendments to Articles III, IV, V, Vill, and IX. The technical amendments involve formatting and typographic error fixes, as well as various text changes, including but not limited to: 1. Amendments to Article III amending street connectivity standards in single-family residential zones; 2. Amendments to Article IV amending accessory structure standards and screening standards within form-based zones; 3. Amendments to Article V amending standards for automobile service stations and smoke shops city- wide, and height restrictions for wireless telecommunication facilities in form-based zones; 4. Amendments to Article VIII amending various standards within form-based zones related to building height, facade and building articulation, establishing development standards and revised building types in the NE2 zone changes to the form-based zone land use table for consistency in applicability across all form-based zones, requiring that subdivisions over 3 acres in size comply with large site development requirements, revise block standards in form-based zones, amend height and step-back standards related to new development in form-based zones which is adjacent to zones with lower density or height limitations, and clarifying non-residential use mix requirements; 5. Amendments to Article IX amending various definitions for automobile service stations and smoke and tobacco shops. Development Code Text Amendments: 1. Article III a. Street Connectivity Standards (Chapter 17.36, Section 17.36.010): Proposed amendments to Article III establish additional street connectivity standards for all new developments in single-family residential zones. For example, future development will be required to provide through streets without cul-de-sacs, and dead-end streets will only be allowed to provide future connectivity to adjacent development. Implementing these standards will improve circulation for residents, improve response times for emergency services and reduce vehicle miles traveled. Page 2 2. Article IV a. Accessory Structure Development Standards (Chapter 17.42, Section 17.42.040): Amendments to Article 4 edits Table 17.42.040-1, which provides development standards for accessory structures. Prior to these edits, this table led to confusion between front setback and what is referred to as the front yard, or those areas between the street and the house that are located outside of the front setback. Due to this confusion, it was unclear to staff whether certain structures could be located in the front yard as long as they remained outside of the front setback. This amendment clarifies that certain open structures with a solid roof (i.e. patio cover, gazebo), is permitted in the front yard but still prohibited from being located in the front setback. b. Screening Standards with Form-Based Zones (Chapter 17.48, Section 17.48.050.D.4): This amendment clarifies that materials, supplies, equipment, loading docks, trucks, and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed building or an area screening from public view within form-based zones. Screening requirements, particularly within ME1 and ME2, are critical as these are form- based zones which permit a variety of medium to high intensity uses where buildings front streets creating vibrant hubs of activity. Establishing clear screening requirements facilitates this desired neighborhood form. 3. Article V a. Automobile Service Station Standards (Chapter 17.89): On March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager to research and compile information about service stations in the city in response to a variety of concerns which had been raised by residents over and to consider how service stations may factor into the General Plan's vision for land use and economic development. This analysis included but was not limited to analyzing the number and location of existing service stations in the City, analysis of land use benefits of these uses to the community, costs of providing public safety services at service station locations, and the consideration of possible performance standards and/or conditions that could be placed on service stations to promote optimal community benefit. On April 21, 2021, the City Council conducted a special study session enacting a moratorium on service stations until such time that staff could sufficiently analyze issues raised. On April 6, 2022, this moratorium was extended to April 20, 2023. This amendment establishes a new chapter for Automobile Service Station standards which ensures that these uses will effectuate the vision of the general plan by: i. Establishing separation, distance, and adjacency requirements from sensitive uses. For example, automobile service stations shall be located no closer than 1,000 linear feet to other automobile service stations and not more than two stations are permitted at any intersection; ii. Promoting and preserving public health, safety, convenience and the general welfare of the community by ensuring that automobile service stations will not create pedestrian and vehicular traffic impacts. For example, new standards establish that the minimum site area for automobile service stations is 40,000 square feet and that no more than two driveways shall be provided to any street from a property which includes an automobile service station; iii. Regulating that the design and operation of automobile service stations will mitigate any impacts associated with these uses, including traffic, excessive pavement, lighting, litter, hazardous material and noise. For example, new standards require that building placement and frontages be consistent with form-based zoning requirements, and new operational standards ensure safe and convenient access by regulating site maintenance, location of trash facilities, noise impacts, placement of mechanical equipment like hydraulic hoists be located indoors; Page 3 iv. Supplementing the standards in the underlying zones within which these uses are located. For example, these new operational standards include regulations for ancillary uses such as convenience stores, car washes and vehicle repair shops to ensure that these will be complimentary, and not detrimental to, the surrounding neighborhood. Lastly, the proposed amendments include language regulating the discontinuation of an automobile service station or related structure, as well as establishing regulations for automobile service stations which may become legal nonconforming as a result of the adoption of this proposed amendment. Specifically, these legal nonconforming regulations provide that existing automobile service stations may not be modified (enlarged, extended, reconstructed or moved to another location of the subject parcel unless the station is modified to improve soil, ground water and storm water quality, made to improve traffic safety, and be made to enable zero-emissions vehicles. b. Smoke Shops (Chapter 17.102, Section 17.102.040): Over the course of the past few years, and in response to concerns received from the community, city staff from Healthy RC as well as the Youth Leaders, a community group comprised of high school-aged volunteers, began researching these concerns related to the proximity of smoke shops to sensitive uses, such as schools and parks. Consultation with Rancho Cucamonga Sherriff's Department confirms that there is a correlation between the proximity of these uses to schools and parks and the instances of sales of tobacco products, including vaping, to minors. Currently, the code establishes a 200-foot distance requirement of such uses from schools and parks. The proposed amendments increase this separation requirement to 1,000 linear feet. In addition, this amendment also establishes signage regulations intended to deter minors from entering such businesses without a parent or legal guardian, places a maximum percentage of the floor area which can be dedicated to selling tobacco paraphernalia, and establishes provisions for smoke shops which would be made nonconforming as a result of the adoption of this section. c. Height Standards for Wireless Facilities in Form-Based Zones (Chapter, 17.106, Section 17.106.040.D): This amendment establishes height standards for wireless facilities in form-based zones. Prior to this proposed amendment, the code provided height standards for wireless facilities which did not account for wireless facilities in form-based zones. This amendment corrects this inconsistency by providing clear height standards for all applicable form-based zones. 4. Article VIII a. Height and Massing for Projects Adjacent to Existing Residential (Chapter 17.130, Section 17.130.030.J.1-3): To better calibrate new development which is located next to existing single-family residential zones, staff proposes amendments and clarifying language which requires that fifth stories and above of new development be stepped back an additional eight feet from the fourth story along interior rear and side facades. Further, this amendment also clarifies similar step-backs for fourth stories on new development adjacent to single-family residential zones, relative to interior rear and side facades. b. Vertical Articulation Standards (Chapter 17.130, Section 17.130.0301, 1-3): This amendment clarifies language related to vertical articulation for upper stories of new development, and also establishes that when building facades exceed 400 feet along a right- of- way, vertical breaks at least 60 feet wide and 40 feet deep shall be provided. The resultant areas created by these spaces shall be required to provide pedestrian amenities and be accessible to the public This additional articulation and revised standards aide in creating a pedestrian-scaled building mass along frontages that creates a welcoming, safe streetscape. c. Clarifying Height Limitations and Floor Area Ratio (Chapter 17.130, Table 17.130.050-1): This amendment eliminates height limits for new buildings adjacent to lower densit residential Rage 4 zones within the ME2, CO1 and CO2 zones in lieu of the revised standards related to interior side and rear yards described previously. This amendment also clarifies that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is applicable only to non-residential portions of development, including non-residential portions of mixed-use development. d. New Building Type and Related Standards (Chapter 17.130, Table 17.130.060-1 and Section 17.130.060): Changes to this table propose adding the "Main Street" building type as a permitted building type to the NE2 zone. These changes also introduce a new"Large House" building type as an allowable building type in the NE2 zone, which is a predominately single-family residential zone which permits a limited variety of nonresidential uses. Corresponding changes to Section 17.130.060.K establish development standards for the Large House building type. e. Building Entrances and Facades (Chapter 17.132, Table 17.132.030-1): Related to the corresponding amendments which allow the Main Street building type within the NE2 zone, Table 17.132.030-1 has been updated to permit the "Shopfront and Gallery, Arcade, Terrace, and Recessed Variations," Building Entrance and Fagade Type within the NE2 zone. f. Allowed Land Use Standards(Chapter 17.136, Table 17.136.020-1); Currently, Table 17.136.020-1 provides that Assembly Uses, where permitted,require a Minor Use Permit in all conventional and form-based zones, except CE1, CE2, ME1 and ME2 where they are permitted by right. This inconsistency had led to confusion internally. Thus, staff proposes an amendment to where Assembly Uses would require a Minor Use Permit in all zones. This would establish consistency in review and ensure that staff is able to properly analyze and condition any impacts which may occur as a result of this use. This amendment also eliminates Automobile Service Stations as a use permitted within form-based zones, consistent with changes to Automobile Service Station standards. g. Various Changes to Large Site Development Standards (Chapter 17.138, Sections 17.138.010.0 and 17.138.030.E-1); Various amendments to these referenced sections include refinements to form-based code standards to better calibrate new development to the General Plan vision. These proposed amendments include: 1) requiring new subdivision maps over three acres in size located form- based zones to comply with Large Site Development Standards; 2) revising Table 17.138.030-1 by establishing block size standards for the Neighborhood General 2 (NE2) zone and reducing maximum perimeter block sizes within the Corridor 1 (CO1) and Corridor 2 (CO2)zones from 2,000 feet to 1,700 feet to better provide pedestrian-scaled blocks; and 3) clarifying language related to height transitions related to new development adjacent to zones with lower maximum density or lower height limits, specifically that any height restrictions which apply in this case apply to buildings across the entire development site, with the exception that any buildings which are located entirely more than 60 feet or more away from a shared lot line are not subject to the height restrictions. h. Clarifying Non-residential Use Mix (Chapter 17.138, Section 17.138.030.J) Currently, related to non-residential use mix standards within form-based zones, there are standards provided in Section 17.130.040.13, as well as in Section 17.138.030.J, Table 17.138.030- 2. It is unclear how these standards relate, and this has led to confusion in the application of this standard. Staff proposes an amendment which provides that when there is a conflict between these two sections, the most restrictive standards apply. Page 5 5. Article IX a. Changes to Universal Definitions (Chapters 17.140 and 17.154): Amendments to this section include proposed new and updated definitions for automobile service stations and smoke shops (Chapter 17.140) and terms related to revised form-based code standards (Chapter 17.154). FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of these amendments will further facilitate future development consistent with the vision outlined in the General Plan. The General Plan vision for denser, mixed-use centers can help Rancho Cucamonga maintain a high level of fiscal performance and become a regional destination and focal point of activity. NEXT STEPS: Upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the proposed amendments will be presented to the City Council for adoption. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: These amendments address multiple City Council Core Values, including providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, promoting, and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and more. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A— Development Code Amendments List (Spreadsheet) Exhibit B — Planning Commission Resolution 23-05 with Exhibits (Link to Amendments and Draft City Council Ordinance) Exhibit C —EIR Addendum Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 22-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2023-00050, AMENDING ARTICLES III, IV, V, VIII AND IX OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2021050261) PREPARED FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a set of amendments, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code amendments are collectively referred to as the "Amendments". 2. On February 22, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendments and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 22, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. The Articles/Chapters of the Municipal Code subject to Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050 are as follows: Chapter 17.36 ("Development Standards by Base Zone") to add street connectivity standards for all new development in single-family zones"; Chapter 17.42 ("Accessory Structures") to revise standards for detached accessory structures; Chapter 17.48 ("Fences, Walls and Screening") to clarify screening standards in form-based zones; Add chapter 17.89 establishing new standards for Automobile Service Stations; Chapter 17.102 ("Special Regulated Uses") amending standards for smoke shops; Chapter 17.106 (Wireless Telecommunications Facilities"), establishing height standards for wireless facilities in form-based zones; Chapter 17.130 ("Zone and Building Standards") to revise various standards including: transition standards, height standards, and building articulation standards relative to new development adjacent to existing lower density development, and new building types within the Neighborhood General 2 (NE2) zone; Chapter 17.132 ("Building Entrances and Facades") allowing for new building fagade types allowed in the NE2 zone related to new building types permitted within this zone; Chapter 17.138 ("Large Site Development") new standards within form-based zones for: block sizes, transition standards for height restrictions and new exemptions from certain standards for buildings located 60 feet or greater from shared property lines with properties with lower density and height requirements, subdivision requirements for Large Sites (over 3 acres) within form-based zones and new standards clarifying non-residential use mix within form-based zones; Chapter 17.140 ("Universal Definitions") and Chapter 17.154 ("Form-Based Code Definitions") amending definitions related to these various amendments, where necessary. b. Inclusive of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050 are various technical amendments to Articles III ("Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards"), IV ("Site Development Provisions"), V ("Specific Use Requirements"), VIII ("Form-Based Code"), and IX ("Glossary") of Title 17 ("Development Code") of the Municipal Code.The technical amendments include formatting and typographic errorfixes, in addition to the amendments described in (a) above. For reference purposes, the Articles subject to Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050 are included in Exhibit „A„ C. The City prepared the Amendments, which are included as Exhibit "A," to this Resolution and are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. d. Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050 conforms to and does not conflict with the goals, policies, and implementation programs of the General Plan, including, without limitation, the Housing and Land Use Elements thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. e. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared an addendum to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") (SCH #2021050261) prepared for the General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan. The addendum concludes that the proposed Amendments do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified FEIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan has been undertaken since the certification of the FEIR have occurred. The proposed Amendments would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the certified FEIR, nor would the proposed Amendments require new mitigation measures or alternatives. Based on this evidence and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council concur with Planning Department staff's determination that the proposed Amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment and an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed addendum attached to the staff report accompanying the proposed Amendments, along with the certified FEIR, and hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the addendum. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of paragraph B above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050, as indicated in the draft City Council ordinance attached as Exhibits "B", and incorporated herein by this reference 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Exhibit A Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Municipal Code Amendment Articles III, IV, V, VIII and IX DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2023-00050 TO AMEND ARTICLES III, IV, V, VIII AND IX OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2021050261) FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to amend existing development standards and create new development standards in order to better calibrate the Development Code to the vision of the General Plan. 2. The City is proposing to amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code. The City has prepared an amendment for this purpose consisting of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023- 00050, as described in the title of this Ordinance (hereafter referred to as the "Amendments"). 3. As shown in Exhibits "A" and "B," the Amendments propose to amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code to establish new and updated development standards for various Articles within Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 4. On February 22, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendments and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. On XX XX, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendments, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to present oral and written evidence regarding the Amendments and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on XX XX, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Per Section 17.22.040(C) of the Municipal Code, amendments to the Municipal Code "may be approved only when the City Council finds that the amendment[s] are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs." The proposed Amendments are consistent with the following Land Use Element and Housing Element policies: • Land Use LC-1.2: Quality of Place. "Ensure that new infill development is compatible with the existing, historic, and envisioned future character and scale of each neighborhood." • Land Use LC-1.4: Connectivity and Mobility. "Work to complete a network of pedestrian- and bike-friendly streets and trails, designed in concert with adjacent land uses, using the public realm to provide more access options." • Land Use LC-1.9: Infill Development. "Enable and encourage infill development within vacant and underutilized properties through flexible design requirements and potential incentives." • Land Use LC-1.11: Compatible Development. "Allow flexibility in density and intensity to address specific site conditions and ensure compatibility of new development with adjacent context." • Housing H-5.1: Development Review Processes. "Consider new polices, codes, and procedures that have the potential to reduce procedural delays, provide information early in the development process regarding development costs, and charge only those fees necessary to adequately carry out needed public services and improvements." • Housing H-5.4: Development Standards. "Evaluate and adjust as appropriate residential development standards, regulations, and processing procedures that are determined to constrain housing development, particularly housing opportunities for lower and moderate income households and for persons with special needs." b. The Amendments identified herein have been processed, including, but not limited to, public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared an addendum to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report("FEIR")(SCH#2021050261) prepared forthe General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan. The addendum concludes that the proposed Amendments do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified FEIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan has been undertaken since the certification of the FEIR have occurred. The proposed Amendments would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified FEIR, nor would the proposed Amendments require new mitigation measures or alternatives. Based on this evidence and all evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and Planning Department staff's determination that the Amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment and an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA.The City Council has considered the proposed addendum attached to the staff report accompanying the Amendments, along with the certified FEIR, and hereby adopts the addendum. d. The Amendments are consistent with the direction, goals, policies, and implementation programs of the General Plan, including without limitation, the Housing and Land Use Elements thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. e. Subject to the approval of the related amendments, the Amendments do not conflict with the policies and provisions of the General Plan, Planned Community, Specific Plan, and/or Master Plan identified herein. f. The City Council finds that the Amendments serve the important purpose of providing sufficient development standards that will apply to various development types throughout the City and to better calibrate the Development Code to the vision of the General Plan. The City Council further finds that the proposed Amendments protect the public health, safety, and welfare. g. The findings set forth in this Ordinance reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. 3. Determination on Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00050. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Municipal Code Amendment DRC2022-00050 set forth in Exhibit"A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference 4. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within the manner required by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS XX DAY OF XX, 2023 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day of , 2023, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga February 2023 1 General Plan EIR Addendum ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR SCH No. 2021050261 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact:Jean Ward, Contract Project Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909.774.4330 Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: Mark Teague,AICP, Principal 303 MacArthur Place,Suite 1100 Santa Ana,California 92707 714.966.9220 info@placeworks.com www.placeworks.com Exhibit C ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Table of Contents Section Page 1. ADDENDUM TO THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN EIR...............................................................3 1.1 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM...........................................................................................................3 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................................4 2. FINDINGS......................................................................................................................................10 Tables Page TABLE 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISIONS...........................................................9 February 2023 Page i ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Table of Contents Tbis page intentionally left blank. Page ii February 2023 1 . Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR 1.1 BACKGROUND This document serves as the environmental documentation for the City's update to its Development Code (proposed project) to ensure consistency with the City's General Plan. This addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified in December 2021 (State Clearinghouse No. 2021050261), demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and that none of the conditions described in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162, exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not necessary. 1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a),an addendum shall be prepared if some changes or additions to a previously adopted EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR have occurred. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations): When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project,no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record,one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;or (3) New information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or negative declaration was adopted,shows any of the following: (a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; Page 3 October 2022 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR (c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project,but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative;or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects requiring major revisions to the General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental document to address changes to the project. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR): (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. A copy of this addendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730. 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The intent of the project is to ensure that the updated Development Code is consistent with the adopted General Plan.The key amendments to existing Development Code chapters and sections are described below and in Table 1 and include changes to Articles III,IV,V,VIII and IX. Page 4 February 2023 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR 1. Article III a. (Street Connectivity Standards, Chapter 17.36, Section 17.36.010): Proposed amendments to Article III establish additional street connectivity standards for all new developments in single-family zones. For example, future development will be required to provide through streets without cul-de-sacs,and dead-end streets will only be allowed to provide future connectivity to adjacent development. Implementing these standards will improve circulation for residents,improve response times for emergency services and reduce vehicle miles traveled. 2. Article IV a. (Accessory Structure Development Standards,Chapter 17.42, Section 17.42.040): Amendments to Article 4 edits Table 17.42.040-1, which provides development standards for accessory structures. Prior to these edits, this table led to confusion between front setback and what is referred to as the front yard, or those areas between the street and the house that are located outside of the front setback.Due to this confusion,it was unclear to staff whether certain structures could be located in the front yard as long as they remained outside of the front setback. This amendment clarifies that certain open structures with a solid roof (i.e.patio cover,gazebo), is permitted in the front yard but still prohibited from being located in the front setback.Also, b. (Screening Standards with Form-Based Zones, Chapter 17.48, Section 17.48.050.D.4) This amendment clarifies that materials, supplies, equipment,loading docks, trucks, and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed building or an area screening from public view within form- based zones. Screening requirements, particularly within ME1 and ME2, are critical as form- based zones permit a variety of medium to high intensity uses where buildings front streets creating vibrant hubs of activity.Establishing clear screening requirements facilitates this desired neighborhood form. 3. Article V a. (Automobile Service Station Standards, Chapter 17.89) On March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager to research and compile information about service stations in the city in response to a variety of concerns which had been raised by residents over and to consider how service stations may factor into the General Plan's vision for land use and economic development.This analysis included but was not limited to analyzing the number and location of existing service stations in the City,analysis of land use benefits of these uses to the community, costs of providing public safety services at service station locations, and the consideration of possible performance standards and/or conditions that could be placed on service stations to promote optimal community benefit. On April 21, 2021, the City Council conducted a special study session enacting a moratorium on service stations until such time that staff could sufficiently analyze issues raised. On April 6, 2022,this moratorium was extended to April 20,2023. This amendment establishes a new chapter for Automobile Service Station standards which ensures that these uses will effectuate the vision of the general plan by: October 2022 Page 5 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR i. Establishing separation, distance and adjacency requirements from sensitive uses. For example,automobile service stations shall be located no closer than 1,000 linear feet to other automobile service stations and not more than two stations are permitted at any intersection; ii. Promoting and preserving public health,safety,convenience and the general welfare of the community by ensuring that automobile service stations will not create pedestrian and vehicular traffic impacts. For example, new standards establish that the minimum site area for automobile service stations is 40,000 square feet and that no more than two driveways shall be provided to any street from a property which includes an automobile service station; iii. Regulating that the design and operation of automobile service stations will mitigate any impacts associated with these uses,including traffic,excessive pavement,lighting,litter, hazardous material and noise. For example, new standards require that building placement and frontages be consistent with form-based zoning requirements, and new operational standards ensure safe and convenient access by regulating site maintenance, location of trash facilities, noise impacts, placement of mechanical equipment like hydraulic hoists be located indoors; iv. Supplementing the standards in the underlying zones within which these uses are located. For example, these new operational standards include regulations for ancillary uses such as convenience stores,car washes and vehicle repair shops to ensure that these will be complimentary,and not detrimental to,the surrounding neighborhood. Lastly,the proposed amendments include language regulating the discontinuation of an automobile service station or related structure, as well as establishing regulations for automobile service stations which may become legal nonconforming as a result of the adoption of this proposed amendment. Specifically, these legal nonconforming regulations provide that existing automobile service stations may not be modified (enlarged, extended, reconstructed or moved to another location of the subject parcel unless the station is modified to improve soil, ground water and storm water quality, made to improve traffic safety,and be made to enable zero-emissions vehicles. b. (Smoke Shops, Chapter 17.102, Section 17.102.040). Over the course of the past few years,and in response to concerns received from the community, city staff from Healthy RC as well as the Youth Leaders,a community group comprised of high school-aged volunteers, began researching these concerns related to the proximity of smoke shops to sensitive uses, such as schools and parks. Consultation with Rancho Cucamonga Sherriffs Department confirms that there is a correlation between the proximity of these uses to schools and parks and the instances of sales of tobacco products, including vaping, to minors. Currently, the code establishes a 200-foot distance requirement of such uses from schools and Page 6 February 2023 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR parks. The proposed amendments increase this separation requirement to 1,000 linear feet. In addition, this amendment also establishes signage regulations intended to deter minors from entering such businesses without a parent or legal guardian,places a maximum percentage of the floor area which can be dedicated to selling tobacco paraphernalia,and establishes provisions for smoke shops which would be made nonconforming as a result of the adoption of this section. c. (Height Standards for Wireless Facilities in Form-Based Zones, Chapter, 17.106, Section 17.106.040.D). This amendment establishes height standards for wireless facilities in form-based zones.Prior to this proposed amendment, the code provided height standards for wireless facilities which did not account for wireless facilities in form-based zones. This amendment corrects this inconsistency by providing clear height standards for all applicable form-based zones. Article VIII a. (Height and Massing for Projects Adjacent to Existing Residential, Chapter 17.130, Section 17.130.030.J.1-3) To better calibrate new development which is located next to existing single-family residential zones, staff proposes amendments and clarifying language which requires that fifth stories and above of new development be stepped back an additional eight feet from the fourth story along interior rear and side facades. Further,this amendment also clarifies similar step-backs for fourth stories on new development adjacent to single-family residential zones. b. (Vertical Articulation Standards, Chapter 17.130, Section 17.130.030.L, 1-3) This amendment clarifies language related to vertical articulation for upper stories of new development, and also establishes that when building facades exceed 400 feet along a right- of- way,vertical breaks at least 60 feet wide and 40 feet deep shall be provided. The resultant areas created by these spaces shall be required to provide pedestrian amenities and be accessible to the public This additional articulation and revised standards aide in creating a pedestrian-scaled building mass along frontages that creates a welcoming, safe streetscape. c. (Clarifying Height Limitations and Floor Area Ratio, Chapter 17.130, Table 17.130.050-1) This amendment eliminates height limits for new buildings adjacent to lower density residential zones within the ME2, C01 and CO2 zones. This amendment also clarifies that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is applicable only to non-residential portions of development, including non- residential portions of mixed-use development. d. (New Building Type and Related Standards, Chapter 17.130, Table 17.130.060-1 and Section 17.130.060) Changes to this table propose adding the "Main Street" building type as a permitted building type to the NE2 zone.These changes also introduce a new"Large House" building type as an allowable building type in the NE2 zone,which is a predominately single-family residential zone where a limited amount of nonresidential neighborhood serving uses are permitted. Corresponding changes to Section 17.130.060.K establish development standards for the Large House building type. e. (Building Entrances and Facades, Chapter 17.132, Table 17.132.030-1) October 2022 Page 7 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR Related to the corresponding amendments which allow the Main Street building type within the NE2 zone,Table 17.132.030-1 has been updated to permit the"Shopfront and Gallery,Arcade, Terrace,and Recessed Variations,"Building Entrance and Facade Type within the NE2 zone. f. (Allowed Land Use Standards, Chapter 17.136, Table 17.136.020-1) Currently, Table 17.136.020-1 provides that Assembly Uses require a Minor Use Permit in all form-based zones, except CE1, CE2, ME1 and ME2 where they are permitted by right. This inconsistency had led to confusion internally. Thus, staff proposes an amendment to where Assembly Uses would require a Minor Use Permit in all form-based zones.This would establish consistency in review and ensure that staff is able to properly analyze and condition any impacts which may occur as a result of this use. To be clear, staff proposes that Assembly Uses not be permitted within the NE2 form-based zone. This amendment also eliminates Automobile Service Stations as a use permitted within form-based zones, consistent with changes to Automobile Service Station standards. g. (Various Changes to Large Site Development Standards, Chapter 17.138, Sections 17.138.010.0 and 17.138.030.G-� Various amendments to these referenced sections include refinements to form-based code standards to better calibrate new development to the General Plan vision. These proposed amendments include: 1) requiring new subdivision tract maps over three acres in size located form-based zones to comply with Large Site Development Standards; 2) revising Table 17.138.030-1 by establishing block size standards for the Neighborhood General 2 (NE2) zone and reducing maximum perimeter block sizes within the Corridor 1 (CO 1)and Corridor 2(CO2) zones from 2,000 feet to 1,700 feet so as to better provide pedestrian-scaled blocks; and 3) clarifying language related to height transitions related to new development adjacent to zones with lower maximum density or lower height limits,specifically that any height restrictions which apply in this case apply to buildings across the entire development site,with the exception that any buildings which are located entirely more than 60 feet or more away from a shared lot line are not subject to the height restrictions. h. (Clarifying Non-residential Use Mix, Chapter 17.138, Section 17.138.030 J) Currently, related to non-residential use mix standards within form-based zones, there are standards provided in Section 17.130.040.B,as well as in Section 17.138.030.J,Table 17.138.030- 2.It is unclear how these standards relate,and this has led to confusion in the application of this standard. Staff proposes an amendment which provides that when there is a conflict between these two sections,the most restrictive standards apply. i. (Changes to Universal Definitions, Chapters 17.140, and 17.154, various sections) Amendments to this section include proposed new and updated definitions for automobile service stations and smoke shops (Chapter 17.140), and terms related to form-based code standards (Chapter 17.154). Page 8 February 2023 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR Table 1: Proposed Development Code Revisions Affected Article Chapter Section Code Amendment Zones III 17.36 17.36.010 Additional street connectivity standards for all new developments in single- All single- family zones. family zones Edits to Table 17.42.040-1(Development Standards for Accessory All zones that Structures)to clarify"Front Yard,outside of setback area",add"Open allow for IV 17.42 17.42.040 structures with a solid roof(i.e.patio cover,gazebo),and clairfy there is no accessory minimum siting distance for certain accessory structures outside of the structures front yard setback area Text added that all materials,supplies,equipment,loading docks,trucks, All form-based IV 17.48 17.48.050.D.4 and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed buildingor an area screening g zones from public view in form-based zones V 17.89 N/A New chapter for Automobile Service Station standards NI,NG3L,ME1, Smoke Shops:updated location standard near sensitive uses,new All zones that V 17.102 17.102.040 measurement of distance standard,new signage standard,new allow for merchandise standard,and nonconforming language smoke shops V 17.106 17.106.040.D New height standards table for wireless facilities in form-based zones All form-based Updated standards for new construction abutting single-family residential All form-based VIII 17.130. 17.130.030 zones,requiring the fifth story and above to be stepped back by an zones additional eight feet from the fourth story. VIII 17.130. 17.130.030 Updated vertical articulation standard,requiring articulation all upper All form-based storeis.New fagade standard for facades that exceed 400 feet in length. zones Updates to Table 17.130.050-1(Required build-to-line,height,and frontage area):Removal of height limits for buildings adjacent to a lower density ME2,C01,and VIII 17.130. 17.130.050 residential zone for ME2,C01,and CO2;updated footnote"FAR applies to CO2;All form- non-residential portion of the development only,including non-residential based zones portions of mixed-use development"(pending City interpretation of minimums). Updates to Table 17.130.060-1(Allowed building types by zone):Allow for VIII 17.130. 17.130.060 Main Street building in NE2,New"Large House"building type allowed in NE2 NE2 only.New"Large House"building type page with development standards VIII 17.132 17.132.030 Update to Table 17.132.030-1(Allowed building entrance and fagade types NE2 by zone)allowing for"Shopfront,gallery,arcade..."in the NE2 zone. VIII 17.136 17.136.020-1 Changes to land use table which require an MUP for Assembly Uses in all All form-based form-based zones. zones New footnote to reference screening standards for industrial uses in ME1 All form-based VIII 17.136 17.136.020 and ME2 zones Updated Site and Block Configurations-updated Block Sizes for NE2,C01, NE2,C01, VIII 17.138 17.138.030 and CO2;New'Transition'standards for height restrictions and new CO2;All form- exemption for buildings which are entirely located 60 feet or greater from based zones the shared lot line. New standards for subdivisions with Large Sites,and new standards for All form-based VIII 17.138 17.138.030 "Required Non-Residential Use"subsection for when conflicts arise with the zones Ground Floor Use restrictions,the most restrictive standards apply. All zones allowing for Automobile Service IX 17.140. 17.140.020 Stations, New definitions related to Automobile Service Stations,new/updated Smoke Shops; definitions related to Smoke Shops,new"Primary Mass"definition,new Form-based "Wings,Front"/"Wings,Rear"/"Wings,Side"/"Wings" definitions.New zones ■ 1 IFigure 17.154.020-3(Primary Mass and Wings). October 2022 Page 9 2. Findings The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas, open space, mobility and access,housing,public facilities and services,resource conservation,safety,and noise.The General Plan EIR included Standard Conditions of Approval (See Chapter 4 Implementation) for the following environmental topics: aesthetics, air quality,biological resources, cultural resources,geology and soils,hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. The policies of the General Plan and the City's existing development standards apply to all development in the General Plan Planning Area and would continue following adoption of the proposed project. As indicated above, the Development Code revisions are intended to improve alignment with the General Plan. As shown in Table 1, the text revisions constitute minor changes to existing Development Code intended to clarify and support implementation of the General Plan. The General Plan EIR considered land use designations and the general pattern of future development.While the Development Code is not specifically evaluated in the General Plan EIR, state law requires that land use and zoning be consistent. The General Plan EIR included policy changes as well as an update to the Development Code,which included zoning updates.Overall,the proposed revisions to the Development Code are minor in nature and are required to ensure consistency with the recently adopted General Plan,any physical impacts associated with the rezoning of parcels are addressed through the City's General Plan Implementation Chapter, zoning, and development standards. For these reasons, the proposed project would not change the conclusions of the General Plan EIR. The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the project. 1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the recently adopted General Plan; therefore, the proposed revisions to the Development Code are consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR and adopted by the City.Consequently,the changes to the Development Code would not change the conclusions of the EIR. 2. There is no new information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR. ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. CEQA Analysis The General Plan Update anticipated the need to amend the Development Code to implement the goals and policies adopted by the City.The General Plan EIR relies upon the Implementation Measures included in the General Plan to regulate all future development. These Measures will continue to apply to all development in the City and will have the same mitigating effects as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Because these changes are a result of the Development Code review anticipated by the General Plan Update, there is no new information that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan EIR was certified. The impacts from the proposed project would be the same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR. 3. There is no new information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. The proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions of Approval identified in the General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new development.These policies would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the recently adopted General Plan, and therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan EIR.There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant effects examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General Plan EIR.Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan would be required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis. 4. There is no new information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project,but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the recently adopted General Plan as evaluated by the General Plan EIR.All policies and Standard Conditions of Approval identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the City and would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and does not change the conclusions of the EIR or require new Standard Conditions of Approval or mitigation. Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan would be required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis. 5. There is no new information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more October 2022 Page 11 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. CEQA Analysis significant effects on the environment,but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project would not result in direct physical changes to the environment but would ensure that the Development Code is consistent with the General Plan. As such, development in the City would continue to be consistent with the buildout projected in the General Plan EIR, and the resulting impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR would remain the same. Therefore, no new Standard Conditions of Approval,mitigation measures,or alternatives to the proposed project would be required. There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or added information that was not known and could not have been known at the time of the adoption of the General Plan EIR.As a result,and for the reasons explained in this addendum, the proposed project would not cause any new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant environmental impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project does not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum. Page 12 February 2023 ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. CEQA Analysis October 2022 Page 13