HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/02/12 - Agenda Packet~~ RANCID UCAt ~
o7, PLAN INU COMMISSK)N
AF ENm
1977
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 12, 1992 7:00 P.M.
RANCliO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRZV~
RANCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPJiIA
I. Pledge of A11egianoe
Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette
Commissioner Melcher
IZI. ~nnounoements
IV. Approval of Minutes
January 8, 1992
AdJourned Meeting of January 16, 1992
V. Consent Calendar
The following Co~sent Calendar items are expected
to be routine and non-controversial. They will be
acted on by ~he Commission at one time without
discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
A. TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT
13812 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE - A request for a
time extension of the design review of building
elevations and detailed site plan for a
recorded tract map consisting of 151 single
family lots on 66.77 acres of land in the Very
Low and Low Residential Districts (1-2 dwelling
units per acre and 2-4 dwelling units per acre,
respectively), located north of Highland
Avenue, sout~ of Summit Avenue, and west of
E~iwanda Avenue - APN: 225-161-35 through 38,
49, 53, 55, and 61 and 225-171-01, 09, 10, and
17.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - FU
~AI LIMITED- A request for a time extension o~
a previously approved residential' subdivision
of 56 single family lots on 14.01 acres of land
in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located on the west side of
Haven Avenues, north of the Southern Pacific
Railroad - APN: 1076-301-17.
C. MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVI=W FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITEQ - A request to
modify a previously approved design review of
building elevations and detailed site plan for
a previously approved tract map consisting of
56 single family lots on 14.01 acres of land in
the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located on the west side of
Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific
Railroad - APN: 1076-301-17.
VI. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP - The
development of a 1,080 square foot retail
addition to the existing Perry's Market Center
on 1.12 acres of land in the Community
Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located west of 9451 Foothill
Boulevard - APN: 208-261-56. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT - A residential
subdivision and design review of 18 single
family lots on 3.84 acres of land in the Low
Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre), located on the east side of Hermosa
Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street
- APN: 201-183-01. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 91-38 - FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY CHURCH -
The request to establish a church in a leased
space of 7,083 square feet within an existing
multi-tenant industrial park in the Industrial
Park District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast
corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street -
APN: 209-401-01. (WlT~D~aWl2 BY APPLICANT)
G. STI~EET NAHE CHANGE 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO
~,~ - A proposal to change the name of
Miller Avenue to "Church Street" for that
portion of Miller Avenue between East Avenue
and the easternmost extent of Church Street, a
distance of approximately 1-1/4 miles. This
application has been filed pursuant to
provisions oft Planning Commission Resolution
No. 90-57 and in conformance with City Code
Section 12.12.050. This application is exempt
from environmental assessment as provided in
City Code Section 12.12.060. (WITHDRAWN)
VII, Dire~tor's Reports
H. REVIEW OF AM[]~ITIES AND RECREATION BUILDING FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 13717 - WESTERN PROPERTIES
I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - LEWIS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the
Uniform Sign Program by adding two pylon signs,
two seconda[/ identification monument signs,
and five pedestrian oriented directory signs
within the Tetra Vista Town Center, located at
the northeast. corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-42-05, 06, and 18
J. COUNTY REFER~T~ 91-06 - GOMES - A request for
Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development
Plan, and Tentative Map No. 15157 for 24
dwelling unit. s on 26.26 acres of land generally
located north. of ~he Southern California Edison
utility corridor and east of the extension of
Haven Avenue in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of
Influence - ~N: 201-043-28.
K. FROGRESS ~R~)RT ON OLD ALTA LDMA NEIGHBORHOOD
vxlz. Cometsmien Business
xx. Pubx~o ~omments
This is the time, and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
ageride.
X. adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. ,If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
I t"l:lls:cle HdM~e"
e ..................
~ i],t-~j-,;::;.~.-: .... ;;;;;:;;:::: ...... ;?:?:::: ................ ; ..... i .........,'/*
I
iL D *
,~ :,
, ~i' "~~r'a
,~ ,
.... .....
,, ,, ,~> ,,
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMON.GA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 138 12 - WATT
INLAND EMPIRE - A request for a time extension of the design
review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a
recorded tract map consisting of 151 single family lots on
66.77 acres of land in the Very Low and Low Residential
Districts (1-2 dwelling units per acre and 2-4 dwelling units
per acre, respectively), located north of Highland Avenue,
south of Summit Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN:
225-161-35 through 38, 49, 53, 55, and 61 and 225-171-01, 09,
10, and 17.
BACKGROUND: On March 28, 1990, the Planning Comission approved the
Design Review for Tract 13812, to expire on March 28, 1992. The
applicant is requesting a one-year time extension to expire on March 28,
1993. Provisions of the Development Code allow time extensions in
twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date
of approval. The applicant may request two additional one-year time
extensions to extend the Design Review for Tract 13812 until March 28,
1995. Building plans have been submitted for construction of these
units; however, the plan checks have expired.
ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and
compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the
Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based upon this
review, staff determined that the project meets basic development
standards of the Very Low Residential. District of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan and the Low Residential District of the Development Code.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following
findings before approving this applic.ation:
A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of
the General Plan, Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, or
character of the area within which the project is located, that
would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-
conforming; and
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TE FOR TRACT 138 12 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE
February 12, 1992
Page 2
B. The granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension request
for the Design Review for Tract 13812 through adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval.
BB: TG/j fs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Lette~ from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Resolution No. 90-32
Resolution of Approval.
WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC.
9035 HAVEN AVE..ELD2. STEIO2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730
(714) 989-5663 · FAX(714) 944-5868
December 12, 1991 C~TY ,";F
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Tom Grahn
RE: Tract 13812-Design Review
Dear Tom,
Please accept this request for a 1 year time extension on our
Design Review Approval for Tract 13812. The current permit is
valid until March 28, 1992. This ~ime extension also applies to
our Technical Review and Landscape Plans.
T have enclosed a check in the amount of $549. for the extension.
Please let me know when I can expect approval. If you have any
questions, please feel to call me. Thank you for your continued
cooperation.
Sinc ly,
Lawis
~Development
cc: Steve Kabel
wp\tr-13812\city\DR-EXT}
A WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY
RESOLUTION NO. 90-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13812, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING
ELEVATIONS, GRADING PLAN, L. ANDSCAPE PLAN, AND DETAILED
SITE PLAN FOR 151 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 66.77 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF SUMMIT
AVENUE AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT {1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE} AND
THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT {2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE}, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 225-
161-35 THROUGH 38, 49, 53, 55, AND 61 AND 225-171-01, 09,
10, AND 17.
A. Recital s.
{i) Watt Southern Calii:ornia has filed an application for the
Design Review of Tract No. 13812 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as
"the application ."
{ii) On March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
{iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on March 28, 1990, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
1) That the proposed project is consistent with
the objectives ot: the General Plan; and
2) That the proposed design is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the
Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purposes of the
district in which the site is located; and
3) That the proposed design is in compliance with
each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific
Plan; and
/1-7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-32
DR FOR 1'[ 13812 - WATT SO. CALIF.
March 28, 1990
Page 2
4) That the proposed design, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
I and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division:
1} All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract
13812, as contained in City Council Resolution
88-699, shall apply.
2) Material changes shall be made to the chimney
siding on the f611owing elevations:
5A - all stone
6A - all siding
68 - all brick
78 - pop-out the brick base
3) Elevation 5A shall utilize a consistent element
size between the box-outs surrounding the
windows and the post at the entryway.
4)Multi-paned windows shall be utilized on some
windows of all elevations.
5) The solid masonry wall along Summit Avenue,
Vintage Drive, the perimeter of lots 144
through 153, and corner side yards along Stable
Falls Avenue and Blue Grass Avenue shall be
constructed of a split face block with native
stone pilasters. All other perimeter walls,
corner side yard walls, and return walls shall
be constructed out of a split face block with
split face block pilasters. The native stone
pilasters shall be 24 inches square and the
split face block pilasters shall be 16 inches
square. Pilasters shall be spaced a maximum of
40 feet on center. The mortar shall be flush
with the block and shall match the block
color. The design, materials and color shall
be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to the 'issuance of building permits.
Material samples shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of building permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90.-32
DR FOR TT 13812 - WATT SO. CALIF.
March 28, 1990
Page 3-
6) The P.V.C. fence proposed along Vintage Drive
shall be a two-rail fence.
7} Equestrian trail fencing on Lots 20 and 23,
adjacent to Vintage Drive, shall have a solid
split face block wall on the street side of the
trail easement and the lodgepole equestrian
fence along the interior side of the trail
easement.
8) Front yard landscaping is required on Lots 1
through 44 and shall include, at a minimum four
{4) 15-gallon size trees on interior lots and
eight (8) 15-gallon size trees on corner lots,
seeded groundcover,. and a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior
to occupancy. This requirement shall be in
addition to required street trees. Landscape
plans shal 1 be submitted for City Planner
review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
Engineering Division:
1) All conditions of Tentative Tract 13812 shall
apply. References to "C" Street shall read
Vintage Drive and "M' Street is now Bluegrass
Avenue on the Standard Conditions.
2} Driveways on corner lots with blind right turn
movements shall be located as far from the
intersection as possible. Where the lots are
narrow, maximize the separation by narrowing
the drive approach width to 16 feet at the
right-of-way, with a transition on the
intersection side of the driveway. In
particular:
a) Narrow the drive approaches on Lots 76 and
85, and
b) Both narrow the drive approaches and
reverse the driveway transitions away from
the intersection side on Lots 119 and 121.
3) The maximum residential drive approach width is
24 feet.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-32
DR FOR TT 13812 - WATT SO. CALIF.
March 28, 1990
Page 4.
4) Slopes within City maintenance areas on Vintage
Drive shall be no steeper than 3:1. The use of
retaining walls in City maintained landscape
areas shall be approved by the City Engineer.
5} Local equestrian trails adjacent to public
streets shall be located inside the perimeter
wall. All local trail crossings of Vintage
Drive shall be located at intersections-
6) Cross-gutters shall be eliminated where storm
drains are available.
7} Landscaping, walls and slopes within the line
of sight for intersections shall' be subject to
the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. In
particular, the side yard wall on Lot 84 should
be placed behind the Bluegrass/Silver Saddle
intersection line of sight.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to
the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND 'ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, lggO.
PLANNING COM SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'
BY. n
cNiel,
AT :
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIF. A, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
/~-//
/1 -/Z
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13812, THE DESIGN
REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR
A RECORDED TRACT MAP CONSISTING' OF 151 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
ON 66.77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED' NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE,
SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE, AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN
THE VERY LOW AND LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (1-2 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE AND 2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE,
RESPECTIVELY), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 225-161-35 THROUGH 38, 49, 53, 55, AND 61 AND
225-171-01, 09, 10, AND 17.
A. Recitals
(i) Watt Inland Empire has filed an application for the extension of
the Design Review for Tract No. 13812 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension
request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On March 28, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No.
90-32, thereby approving, subject to s[mcific conditions and time limits, the
Design Review for Tentative Tract No. 1.}812.
(iii) On December 12, 1991, the applicant filed a request for a
twelve-month time extension.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution-
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Con~nission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
distressed market climate for development of the project.
b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions
make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time,
c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations wouid not be consistent with the intent of the
Development Cod~.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TE FOR DR FOR TRACT 13812 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE
February 12, 1992
Page 2
d. That the granting of said time extension will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity-
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for:
Tract Applicant Expiration
Design Review Watt Inland Empire March 28, 1993
for Tract 13812
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution-
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED - A
request for a time extension of a previously approved
residential subdivision of 56 single family lots on 14.01
acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located on the west side of Haven Avenue,
north of the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN: 1076-301-17.
BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13759 was originally approved by the
Planning Commission on January 27, 1988, to expire on
January 27, 1990. Two subsequent one-year time extensions have been
approved by the Commission extending the Tract Map until
January 27, 1992. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time
extension to expire on January 27, 1993. The related Design Review
approval for the houses was granted by the Planning Commission on
June 27, 1990; however, a modification to this approval is also being
requested on this agenda as a separate item. Provisions of the
Development Code allow for tentative tract time extensions in
twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date
of approval. Therefore, no future time extension requests may be
submitted for Tentative Tract 13759.
During Planning Commission review of a previous time extension request
for Tentative Tract 13759, adjacent residents voiced concern with the
tree removal request. Tree Removal Permit No- 87-87 approved the
removal of all trees within project boundaries, and was approved with
the tract in 1988. Staff met with the residents and the developer to
resolve the tree removal concerns- Based upon the arborist report and
these meetings, three trees were identified that will be preserved in
place. The trees are located along the north tract boundary and are
situated on Lots 39 and 47 (see Exhibit "D").
On December 17, 1991, the Planning Commission approved a modification to
a Condition of Approval for Tract 137.59. The revised condition requires
removal of the current FIRM Zone A designation from the project area
prior to issuance of building permits and not recordation of the final
map.
ITEM B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TE FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 12, 1992
Page 2
ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and
compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the
Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined the project
meets the basic development standards of the Low Residential District-
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following
findings in order to approve this application:
A. That there have been no significant changes in the Land Use element
of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area
within which the project is located, that would cause the approved
project to become inconsistent or non-conforming.
B. That the granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the one-year time
extension request for Tentative Tract 13759 through adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval.
Respec,~
~planner
BB: TG: mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Tree Preservation Plan
Exhibit "E" - Resolution No. 88-20
Exhibit "F" - Resolution No. 90-21 and 90-21A
Exhibit "G" - Resolution No. 91-23
Resolution of Approval
---- -- -- J. I:. Davidson Aaaociatea. Inc.
~ ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
"T'.' ·
_
'!
Dece~er 27, 1991 f~h~ ~ Project No. 87-09965
Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Planning Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
RE: EXTENSION OF TRACT 13759
Dear Mr. Buller:
On behalf of our client, Fu Mai Limited Partnership, we hereby
request that approval of Tract 2L3759 be extended one year past
the current expiration date of January 27, 1992. The filing
fee of $549.00 is enclosed.
This tract is in a position to record, pending completion of
improvement agreements and payment of any required fees or
deposits by Fu Mai Limited Partnership. They are currently
working towards this end, but will require an additional 60 -
90 days to complete financial arrangements. We are therefore,
requesting a one-year extension until January 21, 1993.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have
any questions, or require additional information, please call
me at (714) 686-0844, Ext. 149.
Very truly yours,
J. F.~.AVIDSON ES, INC.
Project Manager
RLS/jc:othrltr:aa4
Corporate Headquarters · 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 300 · P.O. Box 493 · Riverside, CA 92502 · 714/686-0844 · FAX 714~686-5954
~mmet PRINTED ON REECYCLED PAPER
PLANNING DIVISION
/ , Z
ZS~- 7
RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMHISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13759,
LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN:
202-201-53
A. Recital s.
(i) The Des Arch Design Group has filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13759 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map
request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 27th of January, 1988, the Planning Co~m~ission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Co~maission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on january 27, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Co,mnission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the west
side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a street
frontage of 494 feet adjacent to Haven Avenue and lot depth of 1269 feet;
(b) The property to. the north of the subject site is Low
Residential, the property to the south of that site consists of Low-Medium
Residential, the property to the east is Low Residential, and the property to
the west is Low Residential.
(c) The applicant has filed an accompanying Tree Removal
Permit for the proposed removal of three (3) windrows from the subject
property based upon arborical survey and grading impacts.
(d) A geologic report has been prepared, consistent with the
provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act and certified by the Ctty's Geologic
Consultant, indicating that evidence of a near surface, active fault line was
not encountered on the site.
n-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
I'F 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP
january 27, 1988
Page 2
(e) A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared in accord
with the provisions of the Noise Element indicating that a minimum seven (7)
foot high barrier is required adjacent to Haven Avenue.
(f) The proposed subdivision design has minimum and average
lot sizes of 7,210 and 8,268 respectively which are consistent with the
requirements for the district in which it is located.
(g) The proposed subdivision design and accompanying maps have
been reviewed by the Grading, Technical and Design Review Committees and
approved subject to the conditions contained within this Resolution.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coemission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan and Development Code; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative
tract is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or
their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause
serious public health problems; and
(f) l'ne design of the tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
4. This Coam~ission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Coemaission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 ~bove, this Commission hereby denies the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COHHISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88--20
TT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP
January 27, 1988
Page 3
Planning
Tentative Tract
(1) The rear yard slopes of the lots on the north side of
La Vine (33-35, 42-53) shall be reduced to the extent
possible, in order to provide larger usable rear yard
areas, by lowering the pads of the lots to the
immediate north.
(2) Bank protection shall be required adjacent to Haven
Avenue. Design of the bank and wall shall be subject
to Planning and Engineering review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
(3) A sound barrier, which shall be a minimum of 7 feet in
height above street centerline grade, is required
adjacent to Haven Avenue and shall wrap around Lot 1
to the north and Lots 6 and 7 to the south. The
barrier may be constructed with a combination of
earthen berm and decorative block wall.
(4) Due to development requirements and poor health of the
trees, the existing windrows on the site should be
removed and replaced subject to the following:
a. The windrow adjacent to Haven Avenue shall be
replaced pursuant to the City's Tree
Preservation Ordinance #276 with Eucalyptus
maculata (Spotted Gum) which shall be a minimum
of 15 gallon in size and spaced 8 feet on
center.
b. To the interior of the tract, a more intensive
landscape treatment, which is to include
additional tree planrings, shall be provided in
areas with required planting (such as slope
areas and along interior street public rights-
of-way ).
(5) A final acoustical study shall be prepared for review
and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits.
(6) Parkway improvements on Haven Avenue shall conform to
the findings of the City's Haven Parkway
Beautificatton Study.
(7) An in-lieu fee, as contribution to the construction of
the median island within Haven Avenue shall be paid
but 1 dig perm t ssuance or
to the City prior to n ) i
recordation of the final map, whichever occurs
first. The amount of the fee shall be $57.00 per
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
TT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP
January 27, 1988
Page 4
linear foot of property fronting onto Haven Avenue
(~496 feet).
(8) An in-lieu fee, as contribution to the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(electrical and telecommunications) on the opposite
side of Haven Avenue, shall be paid to the City prior
to approval of the final map. The fee shall be one-
half the City adopted unit amount times the length
from the north project boundary to the southernmost
terminus pole.
(9) The existing concrete channel (1 foot deep) north of
the north property line, extending from Mesuda Street
to Haven Avenue, shall be removed.
(10) Pad elevations for lots within the flood hazard area
(Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) shall be a minimum of one
(1) foot above the base flood elevation, as determined
by the final drainage study.
(11) Construct City Master Plan storm drain improvements as
determined by the final drainage study approved by the
City Engineer. These may include one or more of the
following:
a. A Master Plan Storm Drain No. 4-L and/or;
b. Additional facility beneath Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks, to parallel existing box
culvert.
Standard drainage fees for the site will be credited
to the cost of constructing Master Plan facilities and
the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement
costs in excess of those fees in accordance with City
Ordinance No. 75.
(12) Approval shall be obtained from, and a railroad
license granted by, Southern Pacific Railroad prior to
construction of storm drainage improvements within the
right-of-way.
Design Review
(1) A block or masonry wall shall be erected along the
north property line wherever an existing fence is of a
material other than masonry or block (such as wood or
chain link) or is not adjacent to the property line.
The applicant shall work with adjacent property owners
to resolve any double wall situations prior to the
issuance of building permits.
PLANNING COIqqISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
1'1' 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP
January 27, 1988
Page 5
(2) A decorative block wall treatment shall be provided
along the southern boundary adjacent to the Southern
Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The decorative
treatment shall include the use of a darker colored
textured block for the 1 ower retai ni ng porti on with a
lighter decorative block on top, which is consistent
with the wall along Haven Avenue. In addition,
climbing vines shall be planted along the southf ace
of the wall.
(3) Drought tolerant, low maintenance plant material ,
including vines, and a suitable low maintenance
i rri gati on system shal 1 be i nstal 1 ed wi thin the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way adjacent to the
proposed wall for a distance of 100 feet, subject to
the approval of the Southern Pacific Railroad.
(4) The barrier wall and landscape treatment used along
Haven Avenue shall be consistent with the City's
beautification plan for the Haven Avenue corridor.
Landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions
prior to the issuance of building permits.
(5) A drip irrigation system shall be utilized for trees
on any slope areas in addition to normal groundcover
irrigation techniques.
(6) All dwellings shall have rear and side elevations
upgraded with additional detailing representing 360
degree archi tecture.
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF jANUARY, 1988.
PLANNI 01: THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
BY' , NG ISS~ ~
ATTEST: r u~er~
ary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Conmnission held
on the 27th day of january, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit:
PLANNING COI~ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
TT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP
january 27, 1988
Page 6
AYES: COI~ISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
.
';':' ',! i! :;;:::"":" :;-ii"
:--,,,, ,,, ,;."'t; '-"
- -~.:--'t,m,, :*i :-' ;.~ !
,..; · ,,.; · · · · .,s -"
!
'7
:,: ~.ji, iii-,. :..', j. ji[j ~:"::j'j
,~,'~ :,a- :; .. ,t-'2 j ,'--'
- '
"' !' "~ ';' ;';~'!
.-_-i i.E,:,..i -,i =.-'.:ii!
:-,. ., ,:, _
,~,j i~-_~ i :;;, ! i,~ i._~'j-'-:i .{_d::"'.;
;.-!S i--'
.., .,. r..-..
" B--/;~
RESOLUTION NO. 90-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
AND MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 13759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 56 LOTS
ON 14.01 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN
AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-201-53
A. Recitals.
(i) Desarch Design Group has filed an application for the approval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 13759 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map
request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On January 27, 1988, 'this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 88-20, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 13759, and issued a Negative Declaration.
(iii) On December 21, 1989, the applicant filed a request for a
twelve (12) month time extension.
(iv) On ~the 14th of February, 1990, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on February 14, 1990, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
{a) The application applies to property located at the west
side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a street
frontage of 494 feet adjacent to Haven Avenue and lot depth of 1269 feet; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-21
TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP
February 14, 1990
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is Low
Residential, the property to the south is Low-Medium Residential, the property
to the east is Low Residential, and the property to the west is Low
Residential; and
(c) The applicant has filed an accompanying Tree Removal
Permit for the proposed removal of three (3) windrows from the subject
property based upon arborical survey and grading impacts; and
(d) A geologic report has been prepared, consistent with the
provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act and certified by the City's Geologic
Consultant, indicating that evidence of a near surface, active fault line was
not encountered on the site; and
(e) A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared in accord
with the provisions of the Noise Element indicating that a minimum seven (7)
foot high barrier is required adjacent to Haven Avenue; and
(f) The proposed subdivision design has minimum and average'
lot sizes of 7,210 square feet and 8,268 square feet respectively, which are
consistent with the requirements for the district in which it is located; and
(g) The proposed subdivision design and accompanying maps have
been reviewed by the Grading, Technical and Designl~ Review Committees and
approved subject to the conditions contained within this Resolution.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
Concludes as follows:
(a) That the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan and Development Code; and
(b) That the design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code; and
(c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
(d) That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife
or their habitat; and
(e) That the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems; and ~
(f) That the design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easemept acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-21
TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP
February 14, 1990
Page 3
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Tentative Tract
!
1) All Conditions of Approval, as contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 88-20, shall apply except where
modified herein.
2) Approval shall expire on January 27, 1991, if building.
permits are not issued, unless extended by the Planning
Commission.
3) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance
of building permits,, whichever comes first, the applicant
shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a
Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the-
project site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable
School District, for the construction and maintenance of
necessary school facil i ties. However, i f any School
District has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the
alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site
into the territory of such existing District prior to the
recordation of the final map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
Further, if the affected School District has not formed a
Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve (12)
months of the date of approval of the time extension and
prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of
building permits for said project, this condition shall be
deemed null and void.
4) In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 87-531, an
in-lieu fee, as a contribution to the construction of the
median island within Haven Avenue, shall be paid to the
City prior to building permit issuance or recordation of
the final map, whic!hever occurs first. The amount of the
fee shall be the City adopted unit amount for Phase I,
times the linear 'feet of property fronting onto Haven
Avenue (+/- 496 feet). (Replaces previous Condition 7.)
5) Approval shall be obtained from, and a railroad license
granted by, Southern Pacific Railroad prior to approval of
the Final Drainage Study by the City Engineer. (Replaces
previous Condition 12.)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-21
TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP
February 14, 1990
Page 4
6) It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have the
current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project
area. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare all necessary
reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations, etc.
Preliminary approval shall be obtained from FEMA prior to
approval of the record map or issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first. The designation shall be
officially removed prior to occupancy or improvement
acceptance, whichever occurs first.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1990.
PLANNING COMM SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TES
/ra~ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of February, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-21A
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING A CONDITION OF
APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759, LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-301-17
A. Recitals.
(i) On February 14, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 90-21, thereby extending the approval and modifying the conditions of
Tentative Tract 13759, which provides for the development of 56 single family
lots on 14.01 acres of land within the Low Residential District.
(ii) On September 30, 1991, a request was filed by Fu Mai Limited to
modify the condition of approval requiring the Federal Emergency Management
Agency approval prior to approval of the record map;
(iii) On December 11 and continued to December 17, 1991, the Planning'
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the application and conclude.d-.said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. ReSolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 1991, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The requirement to have a Conditional Letter of Map
Revision prior to Final Map approval is unnecessarily restrictive causing an
unreasonable hardship for the Developer.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the"requirement to obtain a Conditional Letter of Map
Revision can he"deferred until after Final Map approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-21A
TENT TR 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
December 17, 1991
Page 2
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies Resolution No. 90-21 by
changing condition No. 6 under Tentative Tract to read as follows:
6) It shall be the developer's responsibility to
have the current FIRM Zone A designation
removed from the project area. The developer's
Engineer shall prepare all necessary reports,
plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations,
etc. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to
the issuance of building permits, except
building permits may be issued for model homes,
subject to occupancy restrictions to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)
shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or
improvement acceptance, whichever occurs
first. This condition shall apply to any phase
of the project affected by a Zone A
designation.
5. The Secretary to this Conunission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1991.
PLANNING CO IISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,
BY: ill l
Larry iel, Chai n
AT :
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 17th day of December 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 91-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
OF 56 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 14.01 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
( 2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE ) ~. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-301-17.
A. ReCitals
(i) Desarch Design Group has filed an application for the extension
of Tentative Tract No. 13759 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Heroinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred
to as "the application."
(ii) On January 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 88-20, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 13759 and issued a Negative Declaration.
(iii) On February 14, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 90-21, thereby approving, Time Extension and modification to conditions of
approval for Tentative Tract No. 13759.
(iv) On December 13, 1990, the applicant filed a request for a
12-month Time Extension.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Con~nission hereby specifically
finds as followsx
(a} The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial
compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific
Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and
(b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause
significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan,
Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plane, Codes, and Policies; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-23
TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP
March 13, 1991
Page 2
(c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause
public health and safety problemel and
(d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state
law and local ordinance.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
I and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for=
Tract ADDliCant Expiration
13759 Desarch Design Group January 27, 1992
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1991.
PLANNING C ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Larr MeNial, Chairm&n
ATTEST:
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Cuemission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coomission held
on.the 13th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit=
AYES= COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, M~LCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
OF 56 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 14.01 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1076-301-17.
A. Recitals
(i) Fu Mai Limited has filed an application for the extension of
Tentative Tract No. 13759 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Nereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred
to as "the application."
(ii) On January 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 88-20 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 13759 and issued a Negative Declaration.
(iii) On February 14, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 90-21, thereby approving time extension and modification to conditions of
approval for Tentative Tract No. 13759.
(iv) On March 13, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 91-23, thereby approving time extension for Tentative Tract No. 13759.
(v) On December 17, 1991, the Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 90-21A, thereby approving modification to conditions of approval for
Tentative Tract No. 13759.
(vi) On December 27, 1991, the applicant filed a request for a
twelve-month time extension.
(vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
(a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial
compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances,
plans, codes, and policies; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TE FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 12, 1992
Page 2
(b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause
significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans,
ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
(c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause
public health and safety problems; and
(d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state
law and local ordinance.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
i and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for:
Tract Applicant Expiration
Tentative Tract Fu Mai Limited January 27, 1993
13759
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - FU MAI
LIMITED - A request to modify a previously approved design review of
building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved
tract map consisting of 56 single family lots on 14.01 acres of land
in the Low Residential District ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre ),
located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern
Pacific Railroad - APN: 1076-301-17.
ACTION REQUESTED BY APPLICANT: Approval of the building elevations and detailed
site plan-
BACKGROUND: On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission approved the Design
Review for Tentative Tract 13759. The application provided 56 single family
residences ranging in size from 1,852 square feet to 2,261 square feet. A total
of five floor plans were provided and each floor plan had two elevations. One
of the floor plans was a single story- There were 38 three-car garage
elevations and 18 two-car garage elevations.
ANALYSIS:
A- General: This application proposes development of the same 56 lots, with
residences ranging in size from 2,079 square feet to 2,253 square feet.
The proposal includes three floor plans with three elevations each. All
floor plans are two story. Two of the elevations have been designed to
accommodate a two-car garage/bonus room option and these have been
scattered throughout the tract.
B. Design Review Committee: On January 2, 1992, the Design Review Committee
(Melcher, McNiel, Kroutil ) reviewed the project and recommended approval
with the following modifications:
1. A minimum of 15 percent of the ]Lots should be designated the two-car
garage/bonus room option- As the project develops, modification to
the location of these units will be permitted provided the minimum
percentage is maintained and these units are spread through the tract.
2 - A minimum of 15 percent of the lots should be designated as RV
accessible. Those lots designated RV accessible should have an
unobstructed 10-foot minimum side yard setback adjacent to the garage.
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 14, 1992
Page 2
3. Garages on adjacent lots should be situated in pairs to add interest
to the streetscape. This may result in reversing the footprint on
Lots 10, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, and 55.
4. Provide a detail of the accent tile and the adjacent stucco finish.
The tile color should be of the same hue of colors used on the
units. The tile accent colors that were not acceptable are Jade,
Mulberry, and Starlight.
5. Increase the balcony support posts to a minimum 6-inch by 6-inch
size. If possible, the balcony on Plan A-1 should be cantilevered.
6. On Plan A-l, the banding on the rear elevation should intersect the
window to allow for a full half-round window above the banding.
7. Wrought iron used on the balconies should be painted to match the trim
color.
During the Design Review Committee's review of this project the applicant
was directed to provide a minimum of 15 percent of the lots with RV
accessibility- Staff believes recent City Council discussion would suggest
that a majority, if not all, of the lots should be designed for RV storage.
During the City Council's discussion on the storage of RVs on January 15,
1992, it was clearly stated that single family detached housing projects
should be designed to have recreational vehicle parking areas to the side
and/or rear yards of each unit whenever possible. Staff understands that
this comment comes late in the development review process of this proposal
but believes it is a significant enough issue to warrant Planning
Commission discussion before final action is taken on this request for
modification.
Staff has completed an initial review of the unit layout and grading plan
for this project and believes a significant number of the lots can obtain
adequate RV storage area with only minor revisions to the plan- Staff will
be prepared to present this information to the Planning Commission at your
meeting should the full Commission find that this project should provide
more than the 15 percent recommended by the Design Review Committee.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings
before approving this application:
A. That the proposed project is in accordance with the General Plan and the
objectives of the Development Code land use district in which the project
is located.
B. That the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 14, 1992
Page 3
C. That the proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of modification to Design Review for
Tentative Tract 13759 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval.
~~lanne~ BB: TG: mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map/Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plans
Resolution of Approval
* '
C -/7
RESOLUTION NO. 90-76A
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO
DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13759, FOR 56
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 14.01 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC ~AILROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACHE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1076-301-17.
A. Recitals.
(i) Fu Mai Limited has filed an application for modification to the
Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 13759 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as
"the application."
(ii) On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted the Resolution
No. 90-76, approving the Design Review for Tentative Tract 13759.
(iii) On February 12, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on February 12, 1992, including written
and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives
of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C-Z-o
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-76A
DR FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 12, 1992
Page 2
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division
1) All Conditions of Approval, as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-21,
shall apply.
2) Landscape and Irrigation Plans showing all
street trees, slope planting, and trees to be
preserved in place shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
3) The design and location of perimeter walls and
return walls shall be shown on the Landscape
and Irrigation Plans and shall be subject to
City Planner review and approval prior to
issuance of building permits.
4) A minimum of 15 percent of the lots (8 lots)
shall be designated as the two-car
garage/bonus room option. As project
development occurs, modification to the
location of these units will be permitted
provided the minimum percentage is maintained
and these units are spread throughout the
tract. Modification to these units shall be
subject to City Planner review and approval.
5) A minimum of 15 percent of the lots shall be
designated as RV accessible. Those lots
designated RV accessible shall have an
unobstructed 10-foot minimum side yard setback
adjacent to the garage.
6) A detail of the accent tile and adjacent
stucco finish shall be provided on the
building plan check submittal. The tile color
shall be of the same hue of colors used on the
units.
7) Balcony support posts shall be a minimum of
6-inch by 6-inch. If possible, the balcony on
Plan A-1 shall be cantilevered.
8)' On Plan.A-l, the banding on the rear elevation
shall intersect the window to allow for a full
half-round window above the banding.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-76A
DR FOR TT 13759 - FU MAI LIMITED
February 12, 1992
Page 3
9) Wrought iron used on the balconies shall be
painted to match the trim color.
Enqineerinq Division
1) The storm drain easement on Lot 5 shall be
graded to convey overflows in the event of the
blockage in a catch basin on the public
street.
2) An encroachment permit shall be obtained from
the City Engineer's office for the placement
of return walls across the public storm drain
easement on Lot 5.
3) Revise the street improvement plans to show
the correct drive approach locations for all
lots on which the building footprints are
reversed.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning~Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
C,-zz-
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SUBJECT:
Those items checked are Conditions of Approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR CO MPUANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDrrlONS:
A. TIm LImits
/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extergled by the Planning Commission, if building permits are
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 monlhs from the date of approval.
2. DevelopmenVDeslgn Review shall be alproved pdor to / I
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of
/ 4. The developer shal commence, particiPale in, ar~consummate orcBase lo be commenced / /
participated in, or cormummmKI, a Mello-Roos Comn~nily FlilNes District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection O4strict to finance conslfucOon and/or maintenance of
a fire station to sewe the dlvel~. The station shah be locate, designed, and built to
Distrtcrs property ulxm con~. The equilxnent shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building 04 a mate, the developer shaJl comply with all
al:q)licable laws and regulaliola. The CFD shall be formed by the Disffict and the developer
bythetime ~olthe~rmlmlpoccurL
5. Prior to recordation ol the finll map or the issuance ol lauilding permits, whichever comes / /
first, the applicant shill comenl to, or participle In, the eei31111merl ol a Mello-Roos
~mmunity Facilities Disfficl 1o4' the oon~malbn ind maintmar,~ of necessary SChOol
facilities. However, if any school disUtct has previously etabashed such a Community
Facilities District, the apl:icant shal, in the alterniNe, cortsent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the finn map
or the issuance of INiiding permits. whichever comes tim. Further, il the affected school
district has not formed a MebRoos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project arid prior to the recordlion of the final map or issuance
of I:}uitding permils for said project, this condition shall be deemed nue and void.
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
inlla~s as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permifs when no map is/ /
involved, wrilten certifr.,ation from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilifles are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of sulxlivislon or priorto issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. SUe Development
/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in acc~'dance with the appmved plans which / /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior malels and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planntng Division, the conditiorm contained herein.
Development Code ragulmlons, and
.Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / /
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. Fqanner.
/ 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntllsuchtimeasallUnilormBuildingCodeand / ' I
State Rre Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occurency, plans shall .
he submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Rre Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shal he inspected for compliance prior to
4. Revised site plans and building elevetU~s incorporating all Conditions of Apixoval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and aggxoval prior to issuance of building permits.
///' 5. All site, grading, lartclscape, irrigation, and street irrlxovement plans shell be coordinated for..//
consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map apfxoval in the case of a custom lot sulxlivision, or
apFoved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
,//' 6. Approval of this request shall not waive congiane with all sections ot the Development / /
Code, all other appicable Cly Ordinances, and agqulcable Community Rare or Spedfic
Plans in effect at the time of Building Perml tasuance.
7. Adetalledon-ieighlNPlenshallberevtewedandaPPmvedbY the City Plarmer and / /
Sheriffs Department (989-6611 ) petor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
irtdicate style, Bumination, localion, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
8. If no centraized trash mcefXacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / ..
9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, / / ·
and the nunte of Uash receptacles shall be subtect to Cty P/nner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
/ 10. All ground-mouoted utility aplxartenances such as translormers, AC condensers, etc., shall / /-
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the usa of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
SC- 2/9 1 2 ~ ' ~- ~/'
P~oi~ .~o.:
Co.,_dedo,, D,~:
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Rannar review and approval in accordance with / /
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
/ 12. All txiilding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fenring, and / /
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and re{}ordation of the Final Tract Map and pdo r
to aplxoval of street improvement and greding plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
/ 14~TheC~venants~C~nditionsandR~str~c~ions(CC&Rs)sha~~n~tpr~hibitthek~eping~fequine / /-
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
/ 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. Allparkways, openareas, and landscaping shall be permanently rnalntalnecl bythepropertlf / /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptabla to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
X 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / /
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the sulxIivlsion which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except fir utily wires and
similar objeds, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contins a designated Historical Landmmk. The Bile shall be developed and / /
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No.
· Any further modifioation8 to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolition, relocalion, reeormruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site
shall require a modification fi the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and appcoval.
C. Bull~llng Deign
1. An aitemative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water fir all dwelling units / /
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other aMmative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and elfic, jency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with sow heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Fqanner review and apexoval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
f 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / /
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance ol building permits.
3. Standard patio cover plans tor use by tl~e Homeowners' Association sl~all be submitted ~or / /
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building pennas.
4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof anted equipment and/or / /
pmjeclions, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered lrom adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate {letell on Ixalldlng plans)
1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feel and shall / /
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the pahdng star (including curb).
2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
3. All parking spaces shag be double striped per Cily standards and all driveway ales, / /
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers ff driveways are less than 18 feet in / /
depth from back of sidewalk.
5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles /; I
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on iNertor circulation aisles other than in-designate visitor paddng areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submtUed for the Cily Planner, City Engineer, and / /
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distrk:t review and approval priori issuance of building
permits.
E. Landscaping (for pul}llcly maintained landNape 8re88, refer to Section N.)
//'1. A detatlecl landscape and irrigation plan, including slope plaming and model home landscap- ---/ /
ing in the case o1 residential development, shall be prepared by a Iceneed landscape
architect and submitted for City Planne review and aRxovel Ixtorto the issuance of building
permits or prior final map aplxov81 in the case of a custom lot malxlivlelon.
/ 2. Existing trees required to be ;xesmved in place shal be Pmtected wlh a construction M~r / /
in accordancewilhlhe Munk~Code Section lg.06.110, and so noled on the grading Plans-
The location el mimes toM preserved in place and new Iocalions for tr~ed trees
shallbesllownonthedetiledlmxlca~ptll~. The al;q)icanl shall folow all of the arborist's
recommendllk)r~ regarding i:xeservation, transplanting and tdmming methods.
3. Arntnknumol treespergrossacre,comlxtsedofthefolowingsizes, shall be Provlded / /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or large, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or laq)er, __ % - 15-galon, and % - 5 gaBon.'
4. A minimum of % ol trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / /
24-inch box o~ lar~er.
5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate ol one 15-gallon Ire for eve~/three
parking malls, sufficient to shade 50% of lhe parking area at solar noon on August 21.
P,o~ No.:
Co.,_d~,,,,
.6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building. / /
7. AIIpdvateslopebanks5feetorlessinverticalheightandof5:l orgreaterslope, but less than / /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation.
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AII private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet inverticalheightandof2:l orgreater/
slope shaft be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-galion or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 25O sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shell be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shell include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and intgalion shell be contim- /
ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing oo:~jpancy forthoe units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to deterrffine thai they are in satisfactory
condition.
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / -
sible for the continual maintenance of ~ landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All lancl~ areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or
decaying pint material shall be replaced within 30 days from the dale of damage.
11. From yard land~ shell be required per the Development Code and/or /
· This requirement shel be in addition to the required
streel trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shell be /
included in the required lanc~ plans and shall be subject to City Pinr~r review and
approval and coordinated for comistency with any pareway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13.Special landscape features such as mounding, duvlal rock, specimen size trees, meander- /
ing sidewin (with hodzonlal change), and inlensitled landm:aping, ls required along
14. Larldscapirlg Iltd iffigltioli SyStelTI required to be instiled within the pubitc right-of-way on//
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously rnaint/ned by the developer.
15. All walls shag be provided with decorative trealment. ff located in pubic maintenance areas / /
16. Tree maintenance criteria shal be daveloped and sulxf~ed for CRy Planner review and / /
al}pmval prior to issuance of building permits. These critertl shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree species.
/ 17. Landscaping and Irrigation shall he designed to conserve water through the princip~es of / /
Xerlscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucarnonga Municipal Code.
· -:-./.., . C. - ?- 7
F. Slns
1. The~igns~ndicated~n~hesubrnittedp~ansarec~nceptua~~n~yandn~tapart~ft~isa~pr~va~~ / /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate ai:q:dloatlon and approval by the Pinning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. AUniformSignprogramforthisdeveloprnentshallbesubmitledforCitYPlanner reviewand / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condorninium, or townhomes / /
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planar, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard formal as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cam deposit on any property.
3. The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / '~' /
project in a standard format as determined by the Cly Planner, prior to accepting a cash
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of fledor noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building matedas and construction technique provided,
and it appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures comained in the final report.
H. Other Agencies
/ 1. ErnergencysecondaryaccessshellbePmvidedinaoeordancewlhRanchoCucam°ngaFire / /
Protection District Standards.
/ 2. Emengency access shall be provided, maintenance lree and clear, a mirdmumof26feetwide / /
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Ctx:anxH~ Fire Protection
District requiremente.
/ 3. Prior to ieeuance of bulking permits for oontestbe constmction, evidence shell be / /
sulxntted tolhe ~ Cucamonga fire Protection DisMet thal tmry water sul:gdy for
fire protection is Ivlll~, pending completion of required fire prefection system.
/ 4. TheN:plcamehdconlactthe U,S, PostelServicelodeerminetheaPPoPdeetYPeancl / / ,
location of mall boxes, Mulllie residential developmema shall provide a solid overhead
stmcture for rrml boxes with male lighting. The finn localion of the mall boxes and the
desiOn of the overheel structure ehal be mabject to CIy Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building pennile,
/ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certilicalion of acceptablity, including all J ..J-
supportive informalton, shal be obtained froin the San 6emardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official pdor to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of bulk:ling pea.
C- Z Z'
Proiect No.:
APPU(::ANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDIN(3 AND SAFETY DIVISION, Cr14) 989-1863, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWIN(3 CONDITIONS:
I. SIte Developmere
1. The applicanl shall cornlNy with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Unitorm Mechani- / /
cat Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of is~Jar!ce of relative pelTtits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
aplNicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / /
to existing unit(s), the a!3plicant shall pay development fees at the eatablished rate. Such fees
may include, but am not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Psfk Fee, Danage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checidng Fees, and ~ Fees.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or induatdal development or / /
addition to an existing development, the al)l:)ticant shall plly deVeiol:NTNint lee8 at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but are not lintted to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checidng Fees.
/ 4. Street addresses shal~ be pr~videc~ by the Building ~iola~. aftertrac~/par1}e~ map rec~rdati~n
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building "Code Ior Ihe property line clearances / /
considering use, area, and ~re-i'esiativeries8 Of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be made to coml:~/with correct buiding and zoning regulations for / /
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3.Existing sewage disposal factlitlas shall be removed, filled and/or capped to oDinply with the
Urdlorm Plumbing Code and Urdlorm Building Code.
4. Uncle:ground on-site uGHties am to be located and shown on building plans suOrrdUed for / /
building perme aplNicaUon.
K. Grading
//1. GredmOofthesubleapm;mWshalbek~accordanceMththeUrdfonnBuimngCode, CeY / /
0fading SlamleNs. and Ime;ed grading practices. The final gfmJf~ plan shall be in
,,,/' 2. AsotsrepoflshailbeprepamdbyaqualifledengtneericensedbytheStateofCalifomlato/ /
3. The cleveiopmenl is located within the sol efxaion conlrol boundaries; a Sol Diltaft)ance / /
Pe~nt is required. Please conlacl San Bemardlno Counly Depaftmem of ~lure at (714)
::]87-2111 for permit al3131catk)n. Documentatiorl of 81x:h perlift shall be suIcxtdtted to the City
4. A geological report shall be prepared by a quailkid engirleer or geologil and sljblTdtted at / /
the time of applir, mion for Fading plan check.
· Y S. Thefinalgradthgplanssha~beconINetedandaPPeovedl3dortotssuanceofbuildingpermits. /
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-16 -
SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP - The development of a 1,080 square
foot retail addition to the existing Perry's Market Center on
1.12 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located west of 9451
Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-261-56.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested bX Applicant: Approval of a retail addition to
the existing Perry's Market Center, site plan, elevations,
conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, and revised
master plan and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
Proposed Site - Existing Perry's Market Center; Community
Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3-
North - Existing Single Family Residential; Mixed Use, Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3
South - Existing Storage Facility and Single Family Residential;
Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
Subarea 3 and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per
acre ) ·
East - Existing service station and office uses; commercial
office, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3
West - Existing Medium High Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre )
C.General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Commercial
North - Co~nercial
South - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East - Commercial and Low Density Residential ( 2-4 dwellings
units per acre )
West - Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently developed as a
shopping center · The site slopes to the southeast at an
approximate slope of 3 percent- No significant vegetation or
historic structures exist on-site- There is a large billboard sign
located on the west side of the drive entrance.
ITEM D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 2
BACKGROUND: The Perry's Market Center was built prior to the adoption
of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code. As a
result, the center does not comply with many current development
standards including streetscape setbacks, landscaping coverage, parking
lot design, and architectural guidelines- The parcels comprising
Perry's Market Shopping center are all currently owned by one entity.
There are long term leases on several of the parcels on the site. Each
of these entities have the option of utilizing the land (and
constructing improvements on it) up until the year 2,058.
The Planning Commission reviewed and approved a previous proposal to add
a 5,380 square foot addition to the then vacant parcel on the site's
eastern portion (Conditional Use Permit 88-28) on January 10, 1990, (see
Exhibit "B"). The project was previously reviewed by the Commission on
September 14, 1988, and subsequently' denied due to significant design
issues and concerns regarding the upgrading of the Foothill Boulevard
streetscape- This decision was then appealed by the applicant to the
City Council on November 16, 1988, who directed the applicant to return
to the Design Review Committee to resolve the issues raised by the
Planning Commission at the meeting of September 14, 1988. The issues
were then resolved and the project received Planning Commission approval
on January 10, 1990- This addition is under construction-
ANALYSIS: This application contemplate_~_. the development of a 1,801
square foot addition directly west of the center's existing 9,000 square
foot pharmacy and east of Nurseryland (see Exhibit "B")- The applicant
is also proposing to upgrade the facade of the existing pharmacy
structure- The California Mediterranean style architecture is
consistent with the approved addition currently under construction on
the east side of the project (CUP 88-28). The upgrade utilizes the same
architectural elements, materials and colors of the previous approval
and ties in the addition with a colonnade structure along the
storefronts- In addition to these upgrades, the applicant is proposing
to re-stripe the parking area directly east of the parcel.
A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the
project on September 5, 1991 (Chitlea, Melcher, Kroutil) and
October 17, 1991 (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) and recommended
approval subject to the following revisions:
1. The column structure on the west end of the north elevation
should carry around the corner as a 3/4 column element.
2. The pedestrian walkway from the plaza area should continue up
to Foothill Boulevard.
3- The parking bay east of the main drive should be redesigned to
provide two way traffic.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 3
B. Parking: The total amount of parking required for both current and
future users is 261 spaces (see Exhibit "G"). The revised Master
Plan indicates a total of 275 stalls, which exceeds the required
parking by 14 stalls for the entire shopping center- The parcel
upon which the addition is proposed will be improved to meet
current Development Code standards in parking lot design and use.
C. Phasing: During their appeal hearing for Conditional Use Permit
88-28 (i.e-, the 5,380 square foot additio~n to the east), the City
Council recognized that the street improvements should relate to,
and be proportional with, any proposed expansion or reconstruction
of the existing shopping center: · Full street improvements are
requi red f or the 100-foot frontage of the subject parcel on
Foothill Boulevard and HampshirE; Street. The remaining Foothill
Boulevard frontage street improvements will be tied to any future
permit entitlements for the larger market parcel, as shown on the
attached Phasing Plan (see Exhibit "H")-
D. Compliance with Conditions of Approval: A condition was placed on
Conditional Use Permit 88-28 requiring that within 6 months of
Phase I occupancy release, the Phase II improvements to the facade
of the storefronts directly west of the 5,380 square foot addition,
would be under construction · Phase I is currently under
construction, and Phase II is in for plan check. In addition, a
condition was placed requiring that a revised Master Plan be
submitted with a new Conditional Use Permit application- The
intent of the Master Plan is to serve as a guideline for future
development through establishing driveway access, overall
circulation system, and architectural design concepts. The Design
Review Committee reviewed the revised Master Plan at their meeting
of October 17, 199 1, and recommended approval · Therefore, the
project is in conformance with conditions of approval-
E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant- Staff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Checklist and has not found any significant adverse
environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the
Commission concurs with staff findings, then issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be in order.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan.
The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause
significant environmental impacts- In addition, the proposed use is in
compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, applicable
provisions of the Development Code, and City standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 4
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valle~ Dail~ Bulletin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within
300 feet of the project-
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the project through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
Conditions, and issuance of a Negative Declaration-
BB:ALH:js
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Master Plan
Exhibit "G" - Parking Calculations
Exhibit "H" - Phasing Plan
Resolution of Approval' and Conditions
NORTH
ITEM CUe t 1 - 1 e
CUCAMONGA ~x~s.- ,'0cAT~o.
DIVISION EXHIBIT: A SCALE: none
~t IAV i. UHOV'IVN ' &-- ',' ~..
/
Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces
Business Footage Ratio Required Provided
Sanchez Foods Market 11,500 1/250 46
All Seasons Pool & Patio 6,500 1/250 26
Cut Rate West 4,500 1/250 18
Sugar Crest Do-Nut Shop 978 1/250 4
Cucamonga Barber Shope 503 2/per chair 8
Hide-A-While Sports Lounge 960 1/100 10
Cucamonga Laundromat 1,500 1/3 mach 13
Peppermint Cleaners 1,200 1/3 mach 5
Vacant 6,400 1/250 26
Taco Hut 1,600 1/100 16
Nurseryland
Retail 7,575 1/250 30
Plant Storage 26,200 1/2000 13
Wienerschnitzel 1,463 1/75 20
Proposed Addition 1,080 1/250 4
Approved Addition 5,380 1/250 22
TOTAL REQUIRED 261 257
TOTAL ON SITE 257
ULTIMATE MASTER PLAN 275
EXHIBIT "G"
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 91-16 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1,080 SQUARE
FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITHIN, AND A REVISED MASTER PLAN
FOR, AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MALACHITE AVENUE IN THE
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-261'-56-
A. Recital~-
(i) Southwest Design Group has filed an application for the issuance
of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-].6 as described in the title of this
Resolution- Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 12th day of February, 1992, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolutio____ n.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on February 12, 1992, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue with a street
frontage of 160 feet and is presently developed with a shopping center and
parking lot; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant
and existing low residential, the property to the south of that site consists
of single family residences and a commercial acreage site, the property to the
east is an existing office building, and the property to the west is the
existing Nurseryland; and
(c) The proposed design of the new retail building together
with the upgrade of the existing building would further implement the goals of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The new development would set the tone
for future redevelopment of the entire center-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division:
1) The building materials and colors, bardscape and
street furniture shall match those of the addition
currently under construction on the east side of the
project (CUP 88-2S).
2) Details of the plaza area (pedestrian furniture,
paving, etc.) directly in front of the pharmacy shall
be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior
to the issuance of building permits.
3) The paving to be used for the walkway directly in
front of the addition and the architectural upgrade,
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to the issuance of building permits.
4) Colored concrete shall be used outside the
storefronts and shall complement or match the colored
concrete column bases.
5). The parapet wall atop the rear elevation shall, if
necessary, be raised to screen the roof-mounted
equipment.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 3
6) A uniform hardscape and street furniture treatment,
including trash receptacles, free-standing potted
plants, bike racks, light bollards, benches, etc.,
shall be utilized for the project and shall be
designed to be compatible with the architectural
style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for City
Planner review and .approval prior to issuance of
building permits.
7) The site shall be developed and maintained in
accordance with the approved site plan which includes
architectural elevations, exterior materials and
colors, landscaping, sign programs, and grading on
file with the Planning Division, the conditions
contained herein, and Development Code regulations.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and
submitted for review and approval by the City Planner
for the project to encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
8) The existing billboeLrd shall be removed prior to
final occupancy.
9) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
10) The entire site shall be kept free of trash and
debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and
debris remain for more than 24 hours.
11) There shall be provision for the following design
features in the trash enclosure to the satisfaction
of the City Planner:
a) Architecturally integrated into the design of
the shopping center.
b) Separate pedeeltrian access (that does not
require opening the main doors) to include a
self-closing pedestrian door.
c) Large enough to accommodate two trash bins.
d) Roll-up doors.
e) Trash bins with counterweighted lids.
f) Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis.
g) Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from
blowing out of enclosure and designed to be
hidden from view.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 4
12) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of
9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. only.
13) All operations and businesses shall be conducted to
comply with the following standards, which shall be
incorporated into the lease agreements of all
tenants:
a) Noise Levels. All commercial activities shall
not create any noise that would exceed an
exterior noise level of 60dBA during the hours
of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 65dBA during the
hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
b) Loading and Unloading. No person shall cause
the loading, unloading, opening, closing, other
handling of boxes, crates, containers, building
materials, garbage cans, or similar objects
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.,
unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner
which would cause a noise disturbance to a
residential area.
14) If provided, any outdoor vending machines shall be
recessed into building faces and shall not extend out
into the pedestrian walkways. The design details
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner.
Master Plan:
1) Upon completion of the architectural improvements to
Phase IV of the site, inclusive of the market facade
and final full development of the primary parking
area, all streetscape improvements shall be completed
along Foothill Boulevard, prior to final occupancy
and release of the project site.
2) The applicant shall submit Phase IV of the site
through the Development Review process, or as deemed
necessary by the City Planner, for review and
approval by the Planning Commission,
Enqineerinq Division:
1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future
construction of the median island within Foothill
Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the
issuance of building permits. The amount of the fee
shall be one-half the cost of the median times the
length of the project frontage.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 91-16 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP
February 12, 1992
Page 5
2) The Hampshire Street drive approach shall be 40 feet
wide. The landscaped area on the east side shall be
tapered at about 30 degrees relative to the back of
sidewalk, to allow for future truck maneuvers.
3) Future Hampshire Street driveway locations shown on
the Master Plan are not approved at this time. Those
locations shall be determined upon development
(redevelopment) of the affected parking lots.
6. The Secretary to this Co~nission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SUBJECT: ~~
APPLICANT: .~~_--&~"J ~ ~~
· oc^T,o.:
Those items checked are Conditions of Apfxoval.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPUANCE "
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
TIme miLS
A. ~J~. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---/ / -
not issued or appmved use has not oommenced within 24 months from the dale of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shah be approved pfk:H' tO I ! - / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granled subject to the al:q:Foval of / /
4. The developer shall commence, PafticiPalein, and cortsummale °r cause t° be c°~~ / /
participated in, or consummaled, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlies District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Disida to finance oonstruction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to sewe the dlvelof3menl. The slalkst shall be locate, designed, and built to
all specifications ot the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proteclion District, and shag become the
0istrtcrs property ulxm completion. The equilxnenl shall be selected by the District in
accordance with IIs neeall. In any kaiding of 8 eelon, the developer shall coml~ with all
apglicable laws and regulaliont The CFO shal be Iormed by the District and the developer
bythetime reclxdadonolthe~nalmaPoccurs-
5. Prior to recorclation of the final map or the issuance ol bulkling permits, whichever comes / /
first. the alXdicant shall cortsertl to, or participle in, the estlbislvTle~ ol 8 Mei)-Roos
Community Facitles District lot the consinN:don and malntenlnce ot necessaff school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously estakished such 8 Community
Facilities District. the alXlcartl shall, in the alternative, coment to the annexation of the
project site into the territory ol such existing District prior to the recordatlon of the final map
or the issuance ol building permits. whichever oomes first. Further, il the affected school
district has not formed a Me~o-Roos Community Facilities Dislrlct witrdn twelve months from
the date of al:;roval of the project and prior to the recoffiatlon ot the final map or issuance
of I~jiiding permits lor sajd I:xoject, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
SC - 2/9 1 1 of' )2 /~ "'/~
~1.1~
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
impacts as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / /
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be sublTdtted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final ITmp al31:H'oval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site~letoPemmt
· The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the al:}pfoved plans which / /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colore, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the cottrillions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business actjvtly being commenced thereon, all / /
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcomrnenceuntllsuchtimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand / ': I
State Rre Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bukllng and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating al Conditions of AIq:wovai shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street i~ement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval In the case of 8 custom lot subdivision, or
alqxoved use has commenced, whichever comes fil,sL
6. Aplxoval of this request shall not waive comphnce with all sections of the Development / /
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
7. AdetaledHelghlinOplenshallberevlewedandaPProvedbY the Cily planner and ---/ /
Shedlf's Deemfm~ (969-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building pea. Such plan shall
indicate style, alumlnalion, localion, hetgll, and method of shielding so so not to edverseiy
8. If no cenlraized trash mce;Xactes are provided, am trash pick-up shall be for individual units / /
9. Trash rece~acle(s)are requtred and shall meel CllY standmds. Thefinal design, locattons /
andthe number of trash receptacles shallbe sul~ectto CRy Planner review and appfoval
10. All ground-moulXed utility appurtenances such as translormers, AC condensers, etc., shall / .J-
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
~///12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fendrig, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&FIs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Pinning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Flnal Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recoKled copy shall be
V//, provided to the City Engineer.
16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently malntalned by the property
owner, hornsowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to i-'~suance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordlion of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall pmhibil the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excepl for utility wires and
similar objecls, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The ate shall be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Petrol No.
· Any further modifications to the site includk~, but not Iknitad to, exterior alterations and/or
interior alterations which affecl the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolition, relocalion, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site,
shall require I rnodificm~ fo the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and appcoval.
C. Bull{ling Design
1. An aitemative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units
and lor hailing any swimming pool or spa, unless other stemstirs eneq}y systems are
time of initial development i be supplemented with so/r heating. Details shall be
included in the building plane Ind shall be sul)mitted for City Planner review and aplxoval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. All dwellings shall have the from, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sut}fect to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
SC - 2/9! 3 of ]:i -~ "~'' /
~..~..~E_~ I. I ~
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / /
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
V/'/4. A~~r~~fappurtenanc~s~indudingairconditionersand~therr~~frn~untedec~uiprTt~ntanc~/~r / /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Acce~ (Indicate 6et~ll~ on I}ullcllng plmn~)
L//~I. A~~parkingiot~anc~scapeis~anc~sshe~~haveaminimum~utsic~edirnensi~n~f6feetandsha~~ /
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall {including curb).
L///" 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/unitarouildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
~//3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / /
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / /
depth from back of sidewalk.
5. TheC~venants~C~nd~ti~nsandRestr~c~i~n~sha~~restr~c~th®st~rage~~recreationa~vehic~e~ / 7 I
on this site unless they am the principal source of transpoetation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor paddng areas.
6. Plane for any security gates shall be submitted for the C~/Planner, City Engineer, and / /
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priori issuance of building
permits.
E. La~l.plng (for pul}llcly ntmlntmlned I~nc~ ~ refer to Section N.)
A detailed landscape and irrtgalion plan, including slope planting and rnoclel home landscap- ----/ /
ing in the case of residential development, shal be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and aulCNTtitled for City Planner review and al:q)mvml priorto the imluance of building
permits or prior final map approval in the case o( a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees requked to be presented in pl~ce shall be Ixotected with I oonstruction barrier / /
in accordance wtth the Municipl Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted onthe grading plans.
The location ot those tmel Io be preserved in place and new localions for tartsplanted trees
shallbeshownonthecletailedlart~plins. The ippicanl ahallfolow all of the arborist's
recommmxllkml nlgarcling preservation, tranq)ianting and trimming methods.
3. Ammoe tmespergrouacre,com~olthefolowtngsizes, shallbeProvided / /
within the projecl: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
~///4 '%'24'inchb°x°rlarger''%'lS'gal°n'and'%'Sgal~n'~
· A minimum of .% of trees planted within me project mall be specimen size trees - / /
24-inch box or irger.
5.VVithtn parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate ot one 15-gallon tree for every three /
parking malls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one '
tree per 30 linear feet of building. / /
7. AIIprivateslopebanks5feetorlessinverticalheightandof5:l orgreaterslope, but less than /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AII private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:l orgreater/ /
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-galion or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and approprtme ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2::1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-galion or larger size tree per each 250 scl. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- //
ously rnaintalned in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those u nits, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to determine thal they are in satislactory
10. For rnuiti-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / /
sitde for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shal be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving cortdition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced wilhin 30 days from the dale of damage.
11. From yard landscaping shell be required per the Development Code and/or / /
. This requirement shel be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, L!~ng, and sidewalks shall be / /
included in the required lanc~ plarm and Ihall be subject to City Pimter review and
apl:xoval and coorclinated for consistency with any peekway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Diviion.
13. Special landscape features such as rnounding, aiwlal rock, apecimen size trees, meander- /
i~ch~.), and imensilkKI landscaping, i~ required along
14. Landscaping and iffigation Worm required to be inlalled within the pubic right-of-way on / /
the perimeter ol this project area shall be comnmualy maintained by the developer.
15. All walls shall be provided dh decor'ative trealment. fflocaled inpublcmalntenanceareas. / /
16. Tree maintenance criteria shell be daveloped and lul)milted for City Plarv~r review and / /--
al)provel prior to ilium of building pertnits. Thele criteria shall encourage me natural
growth characteristics of the eelected tree
17. Landscaping and irrigation shah be designed to coneewe water through the pdncil~s of / /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Ranct~ Cucamonga Municipal Code.
SC - 2/91 5of 12 ,~""Z,,~
F.
~/~1. ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisaPProval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Pinning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign ProgramforthisdeveioprnentshellbesubmittedforCityPlannar reviewand
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directon/monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit an any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the City Adopted
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard formal as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any properly.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway
pmjecl in a standard format as deteffnined by the CIW Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for CRy Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and constNction techniques provided,
and if apl:H'olxiate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the rritigaUon measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencies
1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbelxovidedinaccordancewilhRanchoCucamongaFire
Protection District Standards.
2. Emergency access shall be lxovided, malntenance lres and clear, a minimum of 26feet wide
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho ~ Fire Protection
District requirements.
3. Prky to ilejlnce of building perrrits for contxisli)le constmction, evidence shall be
sulxnilted to the I:llncho Cucarnonga Rre Protection Districlthal temporary water supplY for
fire proteclion is avBlable, pending completion of required fire protection system.
4. The al}i)kant shall contacl lhe U.S. Postal Servioefo detefmirle the aPProPdale tYPe and
location of mail boxes. Mulli-famity residential developments shall provide a soll overtmad
structure for mail boxes with adequate Iighling. The final localion of the mall boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subted to Cly Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certitioation of acceptability, including all/ /-
supportive intormation, shall be obtained from the San Bemardtho County Department of
Environmental Health and sulynilted to the Building Official Ixtor to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
SC - 2/9 1 6 of 12 r~ ,-- ~ ~/
APPUCANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Sit~/~velopnlent
1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Unitorm Mechani- / /
caf Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
2. Pdor to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / /
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but am not limited to: City Besutification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / /
addition to an existing development, the a;plicant shall pay developmeN fees at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recorclation
and prior to issuance of building permitS. .
Exist Structurel "
J' ~r~l. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building*'C.,ocle for the pn3perty line clearances / /
considering use, area, and fire-reeistivenem of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be rnede to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / /
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing~ewaged~~p~~alfa~i~Nle~~hal~berern~ved~f~~ec~and/or~appedt~co~q3~ywiththe / /
Uniform Plumbing Code and Urdlorm BuildirK} Code.
4. Underground on-Me utilities are to be locate and shown on building IMn8 mjbeTeted for / /
building permit al:pkation.
K'G~/~lngl. GraC~ingofthemJ~)iec~p~pe~y~1~beinac~rd~mcew~htheUr~n~BulldingC~le~Cit~ / /
Gred~g Standwee, and exepted grad~g prac:Uces. The final gracing pen shall be in
2. A aces repod aid be Wepered by a clue englreer IcenEed by the gate of Camomla to//
3. The development t8 located within the soil erosion conlrol boundarMs; a SoN Dtatuft)ance / /
Perme i re<Ned. Please coreact San eernwdlno Coune/Department of Agrk:ueure at (714)
387-2111 for permit applcatfon. Documentation of mjch perroll 8hall be mjbmilted to the City
4.A geological report shall be prepared by a qualillecl engineer or geologist and submitted at J----/
the time of application for grading plan check.
5. ThefinaigradingplansshallbecompletedandaPProvedPdortolseuanceofbuildingpermits' / /
SC-2/91 70f12 "~'~----2,-~
6. As a custom-lot subdivision. lh~ loftowing requirern~nis shaft ~
~ a. SureW shall be ~st~ a~ an agree~nt ex~t~ guarameei~ ~let~n of all on-sRe / /
draina~ faciiRies n~essa~ for dewated~ all parcels to the satisfa~n of the Bui~i~
a~ Satety Divis~n p~ r to final m~ ~mval a~ pmr to the issua~e of gradi~ permits.
b. ~propdate easemems ~or safe dis~sal of draina~ wmer that are ~~ onto / /
or over adjacem parcels, am to N delineat~ a~ r~ffi~ to the satisf~n of the
Bui~i~ a~ SafeW D~is~n ~r to ima~ of grMi~ aM ~iMi~ pe~its.
c. On-site draiMge improverams, n~esSa~ for ~ated~ a~ Wotffii~ the su~N~ / /
~o~ms, are to N i~all~ pnor to ima~ of ~ ~ for ~nstm~n u~n
any ~mel that my ~ subj~ to drai~ fN emed~, lavi~, or wRhin a parcel
relmNe to which a ~i~i~ ~ is r~e~.
d. FiMI gmdi~ Nns for egh ~mel are to M mb~ to ~e ~i~ a~ SMeW . / /
D~n for mval ~r to ~a~e of ~i~i~ ~ gri~ ~. (~is ~y be on an
imremmal or ~mte Msm.)
e. All si~ M~s in excen of 5 feet in ve~ml M~ i N ~ dh nmi~ grasses / /
or pim~ wffh gmu~ ~ver for ems~n ~ml u~n ~~n ~ gQdi~ or ~m other
a~e~e ~t~ of ems~n ~mml ~ ~ ~~ m N ~~n of the ~i~i~
~il. In ~e~n a ~a~m i~n ~mem ~ M ~i. ~is ~iremem
r~im~ms of S~ion 17.~.040 1 of tM ~vem~ ~.
APPLIC NT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE N:
1. RightS-of-way and easements shal be dedicated to the City for II intertot put:ic streets, / /
community trails, public plseos, pubic ~ me, Itreet trees, Ind putlic drainage
facilities Is Shown on the pins and/or tentmive rn~p. Palyes seemms for non-put
facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeclef rails, etc.) illl lie relefvecl Is eJlown on the plans
and/or tentative trip.
I 2. Dedication shall be made ol the folowing dghtl-of-w~y on the peltmeier stmem I /
(measure lrorn irest tenrecline):
total feet on
torn feet on
total feet
totll leer on
3. An irrevocal~e offer of dedV,,ation for -foot wide nmdw~y easerner~ shal~ be made ---/ /
for all private streets or drive.
4. Non-vehicular access sham be dedicaled to the CIty for me folowing streets: / /--
V/ 5. Rectal access easements shall be pmvidecl ensuring Iccets to Ill plrcels t)y CC&Rs ~ --' --
or I~y deeds and Shah be recon:led concurrently with the map or I)dor to the issuance of
building permits, where no map ~ involved.
2/9 8 of
6. Private drainage easements forcross-lit drainage snail be provided and Shall ioe delineated
or noted on the final map.
7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the
neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the follOwing language:
'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the rfgnt to prohibit the
construction of (residential) lxlildin~s (or other structures) within those areas designated
on the mal~ as ~uiidincj restriction areas.'
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lOt to the adjacent lOt through the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qu itclalmed or delineated on
the final map.
V// 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property.
10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along rh3ht turn lanes, to provide a minimum
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used alOng the right
turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easemere shall be provided.
11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acl:luire the required off-site property interests
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and it ha/She should fail to do so.
the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to sulxnittai of the final rn~p Ior approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section
66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required forthe iml;N'ovements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all cos~ incurred by the City
to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security
for a portion of these costs shill be in the form of a ~ deflolit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The Ipprmser shall have
been appmved by the City prior to commencement of the ,~oprai~l.
M, Street Improvements
1. All public impmvemems (interior streets, drtin~ge facilities, community triil$, paseos,
tandec,toed ~reas, etc.) shown on the ~ taxi/or tentlive rn~p i be constructed to
City Standards. Interior Itreel im~l i inctu~, liut Ire not Iinlted to, cufo and
gutter, AC pavement. elve ~3pmaches, sk:lewilcs, ireel ligl~, ~ ireet trees.
2. Aminimumo126-foolwkll tllvemenl, wtlNn1404oolwkle{ledlcllKIdgrl'ol'waYshallbe
constructell for III hlll4lclk:m
3. Construct me folowlng perimeter street Improvements mcl~r~, ~ not limited to:
SC - 2/gl 9o1' 12
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and oredays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side-
walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of Construction fee sr~all
4. Improvement'plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis-
tered Civil Engineer, shall be sut)mitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the City Attorney guaranteeing Completion of the public and/or private street improve-
ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first.
b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees marl be paid and a
Construction parmR shall be obtained from the City Engineer'$ Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect Conduit
shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxee shall be installed on lny new constmction or reconstruction
of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, $eco.ndary or
collector streets for future traffic signal. Pull boxes shall be pieced on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations aCqxoved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1) NI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch g,~v. anized steel with pulrope.
e. Wheel chair ralTqx shall be installed on al four comers of inlersection~ per City
Sindam or as directed by the City Enginee.
f. Existing City rolcIs requiring eortltm Ihll remlin open to trific It il times with
adequate detours cluring con~tructlon. A liteel clolure perutit may be requirecI. A cash
refunded upon conXXetion 04 the corimnaclkm to the Istltl~cUon 04 ate City Engineer.
g. CortcentraleclcIrinegefiowsshallnotcnxesklewal~. UnaerkXwatdrain~ shall be
instNie~ to CRY Slam, exoepl ~' singe famiy e
h. Handiclp Iciess rlmp (:lesign shill be Is spe(:t~ecI by the CIty Engineer.
i. StreetnmlwslhelbelgpmvedbylheCitY~lxt)rtomJI2mllNfor~rstPlancheck.
5. Street ~ pllnl per CRy StllxllKII for II pthrlle IIiteto Ihlll be provided for
review and approval by the CRy Engineer, Prior to any woet being perlomte6 on the pri-
vine streets, fees sMII be Mid and cortmm~iort permits shall be obtained from the City
Engineer's Office in acidllion to any other peffNIS require(I.
V/' 6. Street trees, a minimum 04 15,.gallon size or large, shll be inllllKI per CRy Stlndards in accordance with the City's sirset tree program.
2/91 lOof 12
7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed t}y the City Engineer for conformance wrm
/
actopted policy. ~ '
a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, J
including driveways. Walls, s~ns, and slopes sl~all be located outside the lines of sight.
Landscaping and other olDstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved IDy the City
Engineer.
13. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by _.J /
moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street
tree easement.
8. '~TRANS for any work within the following right. of-way: / /
9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the / /
issuance of building permits:
N. Public Mmlntertlnct Arell
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / /
shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval
or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 'The following landscape parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the
Landscape Maintenance District:
2. A signed consent and waiver form to join 8nd/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ..J /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be Ix}me by the developer.
3. AII required public landscaping and irr~gation syslema Shall be continuously mintalned by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landsciping on the tollowing street(s) shill coNorm fo the resuts of the respective / /
O. Drainage and Floegl Control
1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazagl Zone; therefore, ffood / ...-/~
protecqton milsares shill Ix pmvicled as cArtlied by a regimered Civl Engineer and
aplxoved I:)y Ilte Cily Btiteer,
2. It shall be the developer'l ~ to hive the currenl FIRM Zone .'
designation removed from the project area. The cleveKNxfs engineer shil prepit all
necessary reports, plans, ~ hy~llC caiculmlone. A Concltlonll Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR) shil be oOtlned from FEMA petor to firth roll} l~xq:wal or
issuance of building parrnits, whichever occurs firIt. A Letttr ol Map Revilion (LOMR) Shall
I~e issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement mptance, whichever occurs first
3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and tDpmved by the City Engineer prior to fina;
map al~roval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage
facilities shall be installed as required I~y the C~' Engineer.
5C-2/9t tlc~rz2 D
4. A permit from the County Flood Control Dislrict is required for wo~ within ~s r~Jht-of-way.
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public StOrm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a
blod<age in a sump catch basin on the publiC street.
P, Utilltiea
1. Provide separate utility serviCes to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, ,;vater,
gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordancewith the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required,
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary,
V/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District {CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
and the Environmemal Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of
compliance from the CCVVD is required prior to final map alXxoval or issuance of permits,
whiChever occurs first.
Q. General Requirements and Al~rovals
1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into
one parcel prior to issuance of building permits.
2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to firm nap approval or
issuance of ilding parrnits, whichever occurs tim, for:
04~i- t~{~;re 5'h'ee~' iw-rr~r J-- ,,It c44~e c~,.rcets i~ .
3. Prior to approval of the firm mad a del:~alt shal be posted will1 tile City covef~lg tile
estimmed cost of apl:K~rllCN~i~ the assessmenll undm' AsaMmenl
among the newly created plrcets,
4. Etiwanda/San SevNne Area Regtonll Mlinllne, Seoondlr/Regional, and Master Plan
Drainage Fees Shall be paid ~ to final map mvll or pitor to building permit issuance
no map is involved.
5. Permits shall be obtained lrom the folowing k)enctes for work wihin their dON-of-way:
6. Asigned consenl and walver fofm to join ard/o4'fofm the Law Enlofcement CommunitY
Facilities ~ ~ be filed with the City Enginee Ixfot to final mlp Ippmval or the
issuance ot Ixjitcling permits, whichever o(x:urs first. Foffnatton oosts shil be berne tW the
[}evesolar.
7. Prior to finNizltfon of any devel0iN1~nl phlse, suf~ciefl in~ pins shill be com-
pleted beyond the ptllse 13oundldel to as,sum lecondl~ m Ind drlinlge Ixotection to
the satisfaction of the CIly Engineer. Phase beum shall ooffespond to lot lines shown
on me al3xoved tentative map.
SC · 2/g | ).2 o1' 12 j~ ~ ~.~ 0 /
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14509 - BAAYOUN
DEVELOPMENT - A residential subdivision and design review of 18
single family lots on 3 · 84 acx:es of land in the Low Residential
District (2-4 dwelling units pe=: acre), located on the east side of
Hermosa Avenue, between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street - APN: 201-
183-01 ·
Related File: Minor Exception 91-12.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action ReQuested bX Applicant: Approval of subdivision map, detailed site
plan, conceptual grading plan, conce:ptual landscape plan, and building
elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration-
B. Project Density: 3.6 dwelling units per acre-
C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Existing single family residtences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
South - Vacant; San Bernardino County Flood Control District
East - Existing Northwoods development; Low-Medium Residential ( 4-8
dwelling units per acre)
West - Existing single family residences; Very Low Residential ( less
than 2 dwelling units per acre)
D. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Vacant; park
East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)
E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant except for some native
vegetation. The site slopes to the south at approximately 6 percent.
ANALYSIS:
A. Background and. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 18 single
family lots ranging in size from 7,4 12 to 11,696 square feet with an
average lot size of 9,279 square feet · Three floor plans with three
elevations each are proposed (see Exhibit "F"). Plan 1 is a one story and
Plans 2 and 3 are two story-
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 2
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Vallette, Tolstoy,
Buller) reviewed the project on August 22, 1991. The Committee (Melcher,
Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the project again on November 21, 1991, and
recommended approval subject to the following modifications:
1. All detailing materials (i-e-, brick, river rock, etc- ) should wrap
across the front elevation and onto the side elevations to terminate
at the return fences.
2. The "false louvre" elements above the garage structure on elevation 1A
should be eliminated for "true" louvre elements. The final design and
detail shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval.
3. The wood detail trim piece over the garage door on elevation 1A should
be removed.
4- The roof line of the bay window structure appears awkward on the rear
elevation of elevation 1- The windows on the 45 degree lines under
the roof eaves should be eliminated.
5. Accent paving (i.e., brick pavers, stamped concrete, etc.) should be
added to the driveways to minimize and balance the width of the
dr i veway s ·
With the modifications to the plans and the attached conditions, all
concerns of the Design Review Committee have been adequately addressed.
C. Neighborhood Meeting/Issues of Concern: Two meetings were held by the
applicant to obtain neighborhood input on the proposed project site on
October 29, 1991, and December 18, 1991. The primary concerns expressed
were the view and the maintenance of privacy for the existing neighbors
directly north of the project-
In addressing this issue, staff reviewed the proposed grading plan which
indicates that the finish floor elevations of the proposed houses are
approximately 15-18 feet lower than the existing residences along the north
boundary · Additionally, the ridgeline of the above proposed two-story
dwellings is 27 feet above finish grade resulting in only a portion of the
second floor of the units being visible from the existing homes ( see
Exhibit "G" ) · This significant difference in grade maintains the view
corridor and preserves the privacy for the residents to the north and
future residents within the tract. In addition, a 6-foot high perimeter
wall exists along the project's northern boundary
D. Minor Exception 91-12: The applicant has applied for a Minor Exception
application requesting an increase in fence height to 7 feet along the
eastern boundary of the proposed tract. The maximum height of a wall (6
feet ) may be increased by up to 2 feet through approval of a Minor
Exception. Consistent with the Development Code, all adjacent' neighbors
were notified of the proposed 7-foot wall and no significant concerns were
identified. Due to the topography of the site, staff supports Minor
Exception 91-12 for the 7-foot wall.
pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TE 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 3
E- Technical Review Committee: Tentative Tract 14509 has received approval
from the Technical Review Committee- Attached are Standard Conditions to
address the Committee ' s concerns ·
F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed
by the applicant- Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental
Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a
result of the proposal. If the Planning Commission concurs with these
findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate-
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is con.clistent with the Development Code and
the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or
cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use,
together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the
applicable provisions of the the Development Code and City Standards.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, notices were sent to all property owners within
300 feet of the project site, and the pzoject site was posted- Neighborhood
meetings were conducted by the applicant as previously described-
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract 14509 and Design
Review through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions and issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
City Planner
BB :ALH/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "G" - Cross Sections
Resolution of Approval for TT 14509
Resolution of Approval for DR for TT 14509
3nN3^V VSO~Itt3H
lUaUJdOIBAaa uno/~ee8
~ f//
~'~/o
lUeLUdOlaAe(:] unoAee8
t
1
1
],ueu.~doleAea unO/~eee
o§
C
h
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 14509, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE
BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET IN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-183-01.
A. Recitals.
(i) Baayoun Development has filed an application for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 14509 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 12th day of February 1992, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public heaLring on February 12, 1992, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the east
side of Hermosa Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street with a street
frontage of 223.59 feet and lot depth of 627.61 feet and is presently vacant;
and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is existing
Low Residential, the property to the south of the site is vacant San
Bernardino County Flood Control District land, the property to the east is
existing Low-Medium Residential, and ~he property to the west is Very Low
Residential-
(c) The project includes the development of 15 single family
residences; and
(d) There are three floor plans within the project, each of
them having three different building elevations which vary in color, style,
and material; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 2
(e) The single family lots range in size from 7,412 to 11,696
square feet. The average lot size within the project is 9,279 square feet;
and
(f) The site is bounded to the south by a local equestrian
trail; and
(g) The subject property lies greater than 15 feet below the
grade of the existing residences to the north.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specific plans; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed; and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife
or their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems; and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Enqineerinq Division
1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommuni-
cations and electrical) on the project side of
Hermosa Avenue shall be undergrounded along the
entire project frontage extending southerly
_;'-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 3
off-site to the pole at the north property line
of the single family parcel at the northeast
corner of Hermosa Avenue and Banyan Street,
prior to public improvement acceptance or
occupancy, whichever occurs first. The
developer may request a reimbursement agreement
to recover one-half the City adopted cost for
undergrounding from future development
(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite
side of the street and adjacent on the same
side of the street.
2) Construct the 40-foot wide community
trail/landscaped area along the south project
boundary in accordance with the Common Use
Agreement - Alta Loma Basin No. 2 (Contract No.
289). The landscaping shall be consistent with
the existing portion to the east.
3) Construct the City's Master Plan Storm Drain
Line in Hermosa Avenue extending from the Alta
Loma Basins to north of the north project
boundary. Sufficient catch basin capacity
shall be provided to protect the site from
flows from the north and intercept an
equivalent flow that was intercepted by the
existing inlet facil].ty south of the project.
The project shall be eligible for drainage fee
credit and reimbursement for permanent master
plan facilities in accordance with City policy.
4) The Alta Loma Basins located to the south of
the project shall be excavated to provide
sufficient storm water retention capacity to
offset the increased runoff generated by the
development of the project.
5) Drainage from Lots 10-18 shall not flow
directly onto the City maintained landscaped
area to the south. A concrete swale shall be
provided on the south side of the project's
perimeter wall with connector swales (minimum
number possible) to the swale between the
landscaped area and trail to the south.
6) The pedestrian access to Hermosa Avenue from
Corkwood Court shall have additional concrete
provided to make a 90-degree connection to the
sidewalk on Hermosa Avenue and the access.
opening shall not be gated.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 4
7) Every effort shall be made to minimize the
length of tilt cross-section along Hermosa
Avenue as determined during plan check.
8) The storm drain manhole located within the
equestrian trail shall be relocated to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer so that it
does not interfere with the use of the
equestrian trail.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
-'-:;: ' DEPARTMENT OF
o,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
I ' '
SUBJECT:
· _--
~ ~ems ~ m ~m of ~vl.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 98e-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE :
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
· Approval shall expire, unless extended by the manning ~k>n, ~ bu.cnng penTits are / /
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 monlhs from the dale of aPProval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approve prior to / / - / -/ -
3. Aplxoval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject ~o the approval of J /
4. Theclevelopershalcommence, ParticiPaletn, and consummale °r cause l° be c°mmenced / /
participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Comemnity Facllles District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamon0a Fire Protection District to finance construclion and/or maintenance of
a fie station to sewe the deelopmert The station shall be lecated, designed, and built to
al speciltcalions ol .the ~ Cucamonga Fire Protection Dietrk:t, and shil become the
Districts Ixopety upon cmnpletlon. The ecluq:~ment shell be seksctecl by the D~'tct in
accordance wth Its neecl, In any building of a eelon, the developer shall comply with all
ap~ leem ind mgullkms. The CFD shal be tormecl by the Distr~ and the developer
// byNtime receecletionolthe~nalmaPoccurs.
firm, the applicant shall consent to or participate in, the ~ of a Meeo-Roos
Community Facilities District for ~e constNction and rnal~ ol necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the applcenl shall, in the alternative, consent Io the annextalon of the
project site into the territory oe such existing District prkx to the recordtalon of the final map
or the issuance ol building permit, whichever comes tim. Further, I the affected school
district has not formed a Melo-Roos Community Facilities District within tweh~e months from
the date of al3pro~al of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance
of building permits tor said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
SC - 2/91 I of 12 ~ ~--~
This condition shell be waived if the City receives notice that the a;~licant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
V// inkacts as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recordation of the final map or I:x~or to issuance of building permits wt~en no map is / /
involved, written certiticatlon from the affected water district thai adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the ;,'oposed project shell be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Sucl~ letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of sulxlivislon or prior to issuanc~
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site D e~.Ic~lxnent
The site shell be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior rnaterlals and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the condillons contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
.Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / /
Conditions of Aplcxoval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilitY shall nof commenceuntllsuchtimeasaHUnilon~nBuildinoC°deand / ' /
State Flm Ma~shalrs regulations heve been complied wilh. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety
Division to SrK~w compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
4. Revised site plans and building elavatldns incoq;x~reting all Conditions of Approval shell be / /
submitted for City Planner review and a!:~)roval prior to issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plane shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a cuetom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes lirst.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compllrte wiffi all asction~ of the Development / /
Code, all other applicable C~ Ordinances, are appicable Communly Plans or Specific
Plans in effect al the time of Building Permit Isuance.
7. A detalle~l or~/te lighting I~n shall be reviewed and aR3eoved by the City Planner and J /
Sherffi's Del)attme~l (989-6611 ) prior to the Issuance of building perm~. Such plan shall
indicate slyle, Ilumltaliort, localion, height, and method of shielding as as not to adversely
8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for irdvk:lual units / /
with all receptacles shlelde(I from putic view.
9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet C~/stande~. The finn design, locations, / /
and the number o~ Iraerr receptacles shell be sul:~ecl to C~/Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
10. All ground-mounted utility al~urlenartces sucrt as translormere, AC condensers, etc., shall / /-
be located cut of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, arKI/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
SC - 2/91 2 of 12 ~ "~"'
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Ranner review and approval in accordance with / /__
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building nunters and individual units shall be ldentiflecl in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
\.13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and I /
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohi the keeping of equine / /
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in sulxlivisions shall have the option ot keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
.. CC&Rs.
· 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Pinning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whictmver occurs first. A recorded copy shell be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. Nlpadevays, openareas, and landscaping shall be permanently malntained bytheproperty ./- /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the pugtoss of assuming that each lot or / /
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the sulxlivlsion which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordmion of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and
similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landma~. The site shall be developed and / /
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Aleration Permit No.
· Any further moditlcatiorm to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark
trees, de molilion, relocatioet, reconstruction of buildings or stmctures, or cNtnges to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmeek Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Convniuion review and approval.
C. Building Demlgn
1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / /
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alemative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. NI swimming pools irmtaled at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
- prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / /
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sut)jeot to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / /
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof alq:mrtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /
projections, shell be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacem properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be indudecl in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate detalla on I}uildlng plane)
1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /
contain a 12-inch wak adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
3. All perking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / /
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City mandam.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openam if driveways are less than 18 feet in / /
depth from back of sidewalk,
5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles /" /
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on imerior circulation aisles other than in designate visitor pa~dng areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / /
Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District review and approval priori issuance of building
permits.
E. IJnd~caplng (for pul~llcly mintmined I~rldm:mp/are~l, refer to S~ctlon N,)
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ----/
ing in the case of residential deveiol:xvtent, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and submitted for CIy Planner review and approval pdorto the issuance of building
permits or Ic:Nior final map alq:m}val in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existingtree~mquir~dt~bepr~ented~nplac~esha~bepr~te~tedw~h~c~.mtnJctionbarrler / /
inaceordancewiththl MunicipiCode Seclion 19.08.110, andsonotedonthegrldingplans.
The location of those tree~ to be preserved in place and new locations for tranaplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed lanc~ plans. The sp~ shall folow all of the arborist's
recorneTmndlfonl regarding pressNation, transplanting arid trirrining methods.
3. Aminirnumof treespergrossacm,comprisedofthefolowingsizes, shalbeProvlded / /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, ~ % - 15-galon, and .~ % - 5 gelon."
4. A minimum of % of trees planted within me prolect shall be specimen me trees - / /
24-inch box or larger.
5. W'dhtn parking lots, trees shall be planted al a me of one 15-gallon tree for every. mree / /
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at sow noon on August 21.
6. Trees shell be planted in areas o~public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
7. Aii private slopebanksSfeetorlessinverticalheightandofS:l orgmaterslope, but less than
2:1 slope, shell be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shell include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AIIprivate slopes in excess of S feet, but lessthan8 feet inverticai height andol2:l orgreater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2::1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-<Jailon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shell be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shell include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrlgallon shell be contim-
ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for thoae units, an inspection
shell be conducted by the Rannir~ Division to determine thal they are in
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are ms}on-
sUe for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaled areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any danlged, deal, diseased, or
decaying plant material shal be replaced within 30 days from the dale of damage.
11. From yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or
· This requirement shal be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter pad<ways, wals, landscaping, and sidewalks shell be
included in the required landscape plans ~ shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as rnounding, alluvial rock, elacimen size trees, meander-
ing sidewais (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along
14. Landscaping and ifftgation sysleme required fo be installed within the Publc rigtl-of~vayon / /
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
15. AII walls shal be provided with decoralive treatmenl. fflocatal in pubic rnalntenance areas, / /---
the design shill be coordinale<l with the Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed a~l sulxniltal for Cly Planner review and / / .
q:q:x'ovel Ixior fo ismjance of buildi~ permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / J
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucarnonga Municipal Code.
F. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the subrnitted plans are concePtual onlY and not a Part of thisapproval.//
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for epadment, condominium, or townhomes / /
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / /___
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten notice of the City Adopted / /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
PinMr, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer writtan notice of the Foothill Freeway 1 ' /
projecl in a standard format as determined by the CIty Planner, prior to accepting a cash :
deposit on any property.
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for C~ Planner review and aggreval prior to the / /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to bee 45 CNEL the building materials and construction technique provided,
and if aggroptate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation meeime. The building plans will be
checked for conforrnance with the mitigation roeires contained in the final report.
H, Other Agencle
1. ErnergencysecondarymssshallbeProvldedinaccordancewilhRanchoCucam°ngaFire / /
Protection District Standards.
2. Emergency access shall be provlded, malntenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide / /
at all times during cortstruction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
3. Prior to ieluence ot bulking permits for combustibi cortstruction, evidence shall be / /
submired totltl ~ Cu~l~l)nga Rre ProtectIon District the temlx)raqf water supply for
4. Theaplalcantshallcontactthe U.S. poatalServk:etoclaterrninethealR:mPdmetYPeand / /
location of rn/I boxes. Mull-family residential developments shall provide a sold overheed
structure for rnai boxes with adequate lighting. The finll Ioc~ion of Ihe rail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be sul~ect to CIty Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects usi.r)g septic tank f~cilities, wrttten certification of acceptability, including all ---J/-
supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Berrmrdino County Departmere of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official i;xlor to the ilance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. SIte Devetopmem
1. The applicant shell comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plumbng Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applicable hartclouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major acldifion
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include. ~ are not limited to: City Beatification Fee. Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. and School Fees.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or
addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development lees at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
4. Street addresses shell be provided by the Building Official. aftertract/parcel map recordation
and lyior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances
coneiclering use. area. and fire-resiativeness of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal factlles shatl be removed, fled and/orcaPPed to coml)lY withthe
Uniform Plumping Code and Unifo~11 Building Code.
4. Unclergmund on-site utillles are to be locale and shown on building plans sulxnitted for
K. Grading
1. Grading of the sul)jecl lyol)erty shall be in accordance wth the Untlorm Building Code, CitY
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
2. A sees regret still be laefawed by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calilomia to
3. The clevelolynent is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Distufoance
Perroll is required. Please conlit San Bemardino Court/Deparlment of Agriculture at (714)
387-2111 for perttit apptcation. Documentlion of such perroll shall be submitted to the City
4. A geological report shall be lyepared by 8 quaillied engineer or geologist and submitled at
the time of application for grading plan check.
5. Thefin~~grac~ingp~anssha~~bec~m~letedanda~~x~ved~x1~rt~issuance~fbuildingpermits.
6. AS a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site
drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto me issuance of grading permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that am conducted onto
or over adjacent parcels, am to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the
Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided
properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon
any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel
relative to which a building permit is requested.
d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety
Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis.)
e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses
or planled with ground cover for erosion control upon conl}letion of grading or some other
aitemafive method of erosion control shall be conl}leted to the satisfaclion of the Building
Official. In addition a permanent irrigalion system shall be provided. This requirement
does not release the applicant/developer from cornplance with the slope planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 988-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Ded~~n and Vehlculmr Acceu
L. .
- . Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicaled to the City for al interior public streets,
community trails, public paseos, pubic ~ area, street trees, and public drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Pdvafe easements for non-public
facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, afc.) shall be re4wed as shown on the i~ans
and/or tentative map.
2.Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets
(measured from street centedina):
total feet on ~-
total feet on
total leet on
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made
for all private streets or drives.
4. ~~r~~~~~q!~ed to the City for the foilowtng strees:
5. Reciprocal access easements shaft be provided ensuring access to 811 pBr0els by CC&Rs
or by deeds and sham be re{oR:led concurrently with the map or I:Htor to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involved.
6. pdvatedrainageeasementsforCross-lotdrainageshallbeprovided andshallbe delineated / /
or noted on the final map,
7.The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the
neigtt}oring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the tollowing language:
'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga the right to prohibit the
construction of (residential) butTdings (or other structures) within those areas designated
on the map as building restriction areas."
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted I,c~m each lot to the adjacent lot through the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / /
the final map,
9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way / /
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property.
10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / /
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right
turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easemeN shall be provided.
11.Thedeve~~pershai~makeag~~dfaithe~~rtt~acqu~retherequired~~-sitepr~pertyinterests / /
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do ,so, -
the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the irnpmvements pursuant to Govemrnent Code Section
66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required forthe iml:xovements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City
to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security
for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a Cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at devek~er's corn. The appeiser shall have
been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
M. Street Improvements
~/'/1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, I /
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentalive map shall be conetmcted to
City Sindam. Interior street irnlxovements shall include, but are not limited to, curt} and
gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewats, street lights, and street tree.
2. A minimum of 26- loot wide pavement, wilhin a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / /
constructed for all hal-section streets.
3. Construct the folowlng perimeter street imlxovements including, Ixjt not limited to: / / ...
Notes: (a) Median islam includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and ove~ays will be determined dudng plan check. (c) If so marked, side-
wak shah be curviltnear per STD. 304. (d) ff so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall
be provided for this item.
4. Improvement plans and construction:
a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / /
tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the City Attorney guamnteeing completion of the public and/or private street irnlxove-
rnents, prior to final map app'oval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /
constmction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineeta Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name f, igrdng, and interconnect conduit / I
shall be insta~ed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. SignalconcluitwithpuilboxesshallbeinstalledonanYnewconstmctionorreoonstmction [' /
of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondan/or
collector streets for Mum traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes: / /--
(1) NI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanize steel with pulrope.
/ /
e. Wheel chair ramps sl~ll be installed on al four comers of intersectlone per City
Sindam or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring cormruction srtml remain open to traffic at all times with / /
adequate detours during construction. A street closure perutit may be required. A cash
depositshalbepmvlded Wc~verewc~s~fgrm~ingmndPmving, whlchshalibe
refunded upon complelion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaks. Under stdewak drains shall be / /
irmaled 1o C, Jly Standlea, except for single family lots,
h. Hlnolclp mm ramp design shall be as sPectfled bY the ClY Engineer- J /
i. StreetnmmeslbeappovedbytheCitYPImrmerPftortosubmttmlf°rfirstPlimche~' / /
5. Street improv~nwf~ plans per City Stmndmrds for d private streets shall be provided for / /
review and approval by the CNy Engineer. Prior to tony work being pedormed on the pri-
vale streets, fees shall be paid and cortsmjctton permiW shmll be obtmined from the City
Engineer's Office in mddition to any other perrnlls required.
6. Street trees, a minlrrejm of 15-gallon size or larger, shll be installed per City Standards in / /
accordance with the City's strew tree program.
· Intersection line of site designs Shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with '
adopted policy. / /
a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shell be plotted for all project intersections, / /
including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shell be located outside the lines of sight.
Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shell be approved by the City
Engineer.
b. Local residential street intersections shell heve their noticeability improved, usually by / /
moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street
tree easement.
8. A permit shell be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / /
9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the / /
issuance of building permits:
N. PubTNlelntermnce Areel
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / /
shell be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prtor to final map approval
or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The tollowing landscape perkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the
!:~R ls~ Maintenance District:
2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /
Districls shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or ismjance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formalion costs shall be borne by the developer.
J 3. AIIrequiredpubliclandscaplngandinlgationsyslems shall be conttnuously mlntalned by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall corlorm to the results of the respective / /
Beautitlcation Maslar Ran:
O. Drainage end Flood Control
~. The project (or portions meteor) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore. flood / /
protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civi Engineer and
approvedblfl~City Engkteer,
2. It shall be the developeta responslbily to have the currerl FIRM Zone /
designation removed from the project area. The clevelopets engineer shall prepare all
neessary reports, plans, and hyclro~lic c.,alculalione. A Cortdilionai Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA lador 1o final map approval or
issuance of builolng permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall
be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first.
3. A final drainage,~jdy shall be submitted to and apfxoved by the City Engineer prior to final / /-
map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage
facilities sham be installed as required by the City' Engineer.
SC - 2/9 1 I I of 12 ~'-- ~ y
4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within itsright-of-way.
J /_--
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a · /
blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street.
P, Ulllitles
/ 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ---/ /
gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all undeqiround) in accordance witl~ the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shell be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / 1
/ 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requiremahts ol the ----/ /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District,
and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of
compliance from the CCWD is required I:xtor to final map approval or Issuance ol permits,
whichever occurs first.
Q. General Requirements and Approvals ~ /
1. The separate parcels contained within me project boundaries shall be legally combined into
one parcel prior to issuance of building permits.
2. An easement for a joint use drtveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or J /
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs tirst, for:
3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the
estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District
among the ready create parcels.
4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, end Master Plan
Drainage Fees shall be paid Ixior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance ~
no map is involved.
.5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-d-way:
6. A sigrted {x3eemql and waiver form to Join and/or form the Law Enl°rcement C°mmunitY / /
Fadlitlee I:)lerk:l shall be filed with the City Engirmer prior to final flip N~roval or the
issuance of buMcling permits, whichever occurs first. Formalion costs shall be borne by the
· Prior to finalization ot any development phase, sumdent improvement plans shall be corn- / /
pieted beyond the phase boundaries teassum secondary access and drainage protection to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries 8hal correspond to lot lines shown
on the aplxoved tentalive map.
SC - 2/9 1 12 of 12
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAa, APPROVING THE DESIGN
REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14509, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET
IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 201-183-01.
A. Recitals-
(i) Baayoun Development has filed an application for the Design
Review of Tract No. 14509 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the
application."
(ii) On February 12, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on February 12, 1992, including written
and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives
of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs
I and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR FOR TT 14509 - BAAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
February 12, 1992
Page 2
Planninq Division
1) All detailing materials (i.e., brick, river
rock, etc.) shall wrap across the front
elevations and onto the side elevations to
terminate at the return fences.
2) The wood detail trim piece over the garage
door in elevation 1A shall be removed.
3) The roof line of the bay window structure
shall be redesigned and shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits.
4) Accent paving (i.e., brick, stamped concrete,
etc.) shall be provided in the driveways and
shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Con~nission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of February 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SUBJECT:
~ ~e~ c~ am ~m of
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPMANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
TIme Imits
A. ~11. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission. if INilding permits are
not issued or appmved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approve prior to / I
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the appoval of
4. The developer shall commence, particiPmein, and ~oneummale or cause lo be com~ / /
participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roo~ Community Factltes District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance co~n and/or maintenance of
a fire station to serve the development. The slition artill be located, designed, and built to
all specificalion~ ol the ~ ~ Fire Protection DIMdct, and shall become the
Olstrtcrs propee/upon ~onq=leaon. The equq~men~ stud be sea:ted by the D~rict in
accordance with Is needs. In any building of 8 alalion, the developer shall comply with all
apl:dical:de laws and regulalkm8. The CFD shal be forTned by the District and the developer
bythetime recoffiationolthefinairnapoccurs.
5. Per to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permils, whichever comes / /
first, the applicant shall conserl to, or participate in. the e~takidvTtel Of 8 Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District for the constfuction and mainlenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously estalDIished such a Community
Facilities District, the api:dicant shall, in the Metnative. cortBent to the annexation of the
project site into the territop/of such existing District prior to the recordlUon of the final map
or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes tim. Further, il the affected school
district has not formed a Me~o-Roos Community Factties District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this conditiofi shall be deemed huh and void.
This condition shall be waived it the City. receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privatehr accommodate any and all school
impacts as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recorclation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / /
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and wmer
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. STvelopment
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the al~roved plans which / /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landsca~n~, sign
l~ro~ram, and gradinQ on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
[:)evelopmenl Code ragulalions, and
.Specific Plan and
L/// Planned Oommunily.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business ~ belt1 commenced thereon, all//
':::,':,°:.;:::.:: :7_";.:':: :.;..'C: : :: :Z
( I Code and /' /
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and aptxoval prior to issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street imlyovement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consislency prior to issuance of any perrafts (such as grading, tree removal, encroachmere,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes firlL
~6. Approval of this request shall not waive co~1)liarx:e with all sections of the Development / /
Code, all other applicable CIy Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit illlance.
7. A detailed on-alte lighting plan shall be reviewed and aplxoved by the City Planner and / /
Sheriffs Department (9896611 ) prior to the issuance of building pertMs. Such plan shall
indicate style, Burntnation, localion, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
8. If no centralized trash mce~ are provided, a, trash pick-up shel be for Individual units / /
with all recefXacls shielded from public view.
9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet CNy standards. The final design, locations / /
and the number of trash ~aclel shall be ~ to Cty Planner review and aplxoval
fprior to issuance of building permits.
10. All ground-mounted utility aplNrtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc.. shall , J /-
be located out of public view and adequateh/screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
/11. Street names shall be submitted for City Ranner review and approval in accordance with
the adopted Street Naming Policy pdor to approval of the final map.
/12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
V//// including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordatfon ol the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street imlxovements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in sulxlivlsions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the aplxoval of the Pinning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorcled copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. Allparkways, open araas, and landscaplng shall be permanently rnalntained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means ac}ceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for CIty Ranner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently wlffi Ihe recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easemenls shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or Iny other object, except for utility wires and
similar objecls, pursuant to Development Code Scotion 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The mile shall be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Aleration Perrrl No.
· Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior allerations which Ilfecl the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolliort, relocatlcm, reconstruction of buildings or struotures, or changes to the site,
shall require a moclification to the Historic Lanclmerk Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Presenrllo~ Cor/wrillk)n rsNiew and apl;}roval.
C. Bull(ling Dlllg~
1. An item alive energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units
and for heating any swimming pool or spl, unlest other alernative energlf systems are
time of tnitll development shll be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans ind shall be submitted for City Ranner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgr~led with architectural
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Z 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / /
L//// City Planner and Building OIfK:ial review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the smisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate detaila on I}ullding plans)
1. Aii parking iot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / /
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in I /
depth from back of sidewalk.
5. TheC~venants.C~nd~ti~nsandRestr~c~ion~sha~~restr~c~th~st~rage~frecrea~ionalvehicles /; I
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, CRy Engineer, and / /
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and aplxoval pdor to Issuance of building
permits.
E. La~l.Plng (for pul}llcly maintained landscape ares, refer to Section N.)
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ----/ /
ing in the case o1 residential development, shall be prepared by a Iceneed landscape
architect and submitted for CRy Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance ol building
permits or prior final map al:qxoval in the case of a cuatom lot sulxIh~ion.
2. Exist~ngtree~requ~redtobepreserved~nplacesha~~bepr~tec~edwith~c~natruc~~~nberrier / /
in accordance with the Munk:q)al Code Section 19.06.110, and so noted on the fading plans.
The location ot those trees to be ixesefved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailad landscaPe Plarts. The aCq31canl shallfollow all of the art)orist's
3. Amtnimumof tree~pergrossacre,conqxieedolthefol)wingsizes, shall be Provlded / /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24. inch box or larger, __% - 15-galon, and % - 5galon.'
4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shal be specimen size trees- / /
24.inch box or larger.
5.Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate o~ one 15-galion tree for every three /
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at sow noon on August 21.
Pmiect No. :'['q"
C.,om_detian Da~e:
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of'public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one//"-
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
7. Nl prtvate slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:l orgreaterslope, but less than/./
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation ·
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AII private slopas in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:l orgreater//
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree par each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree par each 250 scl. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
plamed in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shell include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shell be contim-/ /
ously maintained in a healthy and thrtving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Per to releasing occupartcy forthoso units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, proparty owners are ms)on- /- /
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving cortdttion, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant matehel shall be replaced within 30 daws from the dale of damage.
11. From yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / /
· This requirement shell be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wedis, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / /
included in the required landscape pins and shall be ~ubject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landrJINng plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as moundrag, alluvial rock, specimen me trees, meander- / /
ing siclewalt~ (with hodzonlal change), and Inlensilled inmcalNng, is required along
14. Landscaping Ind iffigltion m/letm required to be ir~tikKI wthin the pubic right-of-way on J /
the perimeter ot this project area shall be continuously maintained by the devek~r.
15. All walls shal be provided wth deooraltve treatment. ~ located in pulNic maintenance areas, / /
16. Tree maintenance crilerla shall be developed and mlxtiled for Cly Plmmer review and / /
alqN'oval I:~tor to ismjart.,e of INkling permils. ~ crleda shall encourage the nmuml
growth characteristics of the eelacted tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prtnci~s of ./ /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
F. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a Part of thisapproval. / /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Pinning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval p~ior to issuance of building permits.
3. Director/monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / /
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and apl:tovl by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted I /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard form~ as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / ' /
project in a standard format as'determined by the Cty Planner, prior to accepting a cash
depoM on any property.
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and aplxeval prior to the / /
issuance of building permits. The finn report shell dlecuse the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL the building matedals and construclfontechnk:!uesprovlded,
and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The bulking plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigatjon measures contained in the final report.
H. 0tV~/fr Agenclel
1. EmergencysecondaryaccesssrtallbeprovldedinaccordancewlthRanchoCucamongaFire / /
Protection Dtstrtcl Sandan:Is.
V/'/2. Emergency access shalll)e lxovlded, maintenance free andclear, a minimumof26feetwide / /
at all times during cortatnaction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
~ 3. Prior to iMuance of building permits for contxaslible construction, evidence shall be / /
sui3mltted to the Rancho Cucamonga Rm Protection Dtstrict thi temporary water suPl;~ for
fire proteclion Is 8vala131e, pending coml:etion of required fire Ixotection system.
4. The al3plicam shall contact lhe U.S. Postd Sefvice to determthe the aPFoFime tYPeand / /
location of mail boxes. Multi-farnlly residential develol)ments shall ixovide a solid overttea
structure for mail boxes with adequme llgNing. The linal localion ol the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Cly Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of accelXablly, including all / /-
supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPUCANTS SHALL C~A~ ~E BUI~ING AND SAF~ DNISION, ~14) ~1~, FOR
COMPUAN~ ~ ~E F~LOING ~DIT~NS:
i. S~e ve~
~ 1. ~e~~s~B~y~h~e~~Un~i~i~,Un~o~M~ni-
~1 ~, Un~o~ P~ ~, Nat~l E~ ~e, ~ aB ot~r ~i ~s,
offiina~, ~ ~ia~ in eff~ t t~ M~ of/m ~ re~e ~. Please
~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ SMe~ D~i~n for ~es of t~ ~ ~n O~ina~ a~
~i ha~s.
2. P~r to ~a~ d ~i~i~ ~ for a n~ r.i~l ~el~ uriC(s) or ~r a~n
to exlti~ un~(s), ~ ~~ ~all ~y ~ve~m f~ ~ t~ ~ii~ ~e. ~ f.s
~y i~e, ~ am ~t lim~ to: C~ ~a~n F., P~ F., D~ F., Sy~e~
~ei~m Fee, Pe~ ~ P~ C~ F~, ~ ~ F~.
3. P~r ~ ~a~ of ~i~i~ ~M for a ~ ~~ ~ i~ll ~ve~ or
~n to an ex~i~ ~ve~, t~ ~m ~ ~ ~.~m f~ ~ t~
e~li~ ~e. ~h fees my im~e, ~ ~e ~ I~ ~: S~e~ ~~m Fee,
Drain~ F~, ~1 F.s, Pe~ a~ Pin Ch~ F~.
4. Str.t a~re~ s~ll ~ pm~ by ~ ~i~i~ (~i, ~ert~l ~
~ ~r to i~a~ ~ ~i~i~ ~.
J. ~lilng
1. Pmvl ~llme w~h t~ Un~o~ ~ti~ _~ ~ ~ ~ I~ clla~
~id~ use, ~a, ~ ~m~i.W~. d ex~ ~i~.
2. ~i~ ~i~i~ sll ~ / to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ qu~ ~r
t~ ime~ u. or t~ ~i~ s~ ~ ~~.
3. ~i~s~di~If~llss~re~,f~a~~lom~w~ht~
U~o~ P~ ~ a~ Un~ ~i~ ~.
4. U~mu~ o~e ~1~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~~ for
~i~ ~ ~Mn.
K.G~. G~dtM~~~M~~dh~U~~~,C~
~ ~~, ~ ~~ ~ ~s. ~ fml ~ ~ ~11 ~ in
~ 2. A~~iM~~a~~~~Sle~Cal~omlto
Pe~ i ~. Pim ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~~m t (714)
~7-2111 f~~~~n. ~~of~~iM~~ tot~C~
,4. A p~l r~. s~B ~ ~r~ ~ a qu~ q~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ at
t~ t~ ~ ~~n ~r fai~ ~ ~.
5. ~ef~lgrai~ns~all~~t~a~~~rl~md~i~i~~s.
sc - 2/91 7 ~--"" -
,:~:= the undersgned. ask that the Rancho Cucamonga c'i. ty
!: c~!,r!c~i L deElife permit~.~ to. any cor~tractor requesting to. build any
~',c',u~=~r',~.:~ ..u"',~ts on Her'mosa bet. weer'; Banyan and Manzanita that wout].d
bE-z ~. r~ excz~=.~=~= o'~~ two he. uses per acre We request th i ~ i n ]. j. ahf c,.~
,:zm"~e .~=ac.t. that there are already tcx3 many vacant new homes ~n the
a'=,r E.,.~,.~ to, c, n-an'x' unsel].abl e used homeric. in the area and ~inal ly; We
:'~,.,:.:],:/ilree witl-, Mayor' Stout='s campaign promise o~ building Rancho
:'j:U. EZ.~mCj, r]g8 aEe. an equestrian community. UphDlding the original
charter tl"~at ALL property north of Banyar, will be horse proper't.y
c]-~ rio:) mot-E, that1 two hoLtse~ p~l"'
Friendship Community Church
Pastor Randa! K. ~ung
RO. Box 68 ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-0068
knna-~isa He:nandez
City of Rancho Cuctmonga
planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive ..
Rancho Cucamonga, C~ 91730
Dear Ms. ~ernandes,
We wish to withdraw our aI~Plication for · Conditions* Use esrmit.
The new ~sndlord of the ~aven Sxec~ve park would no~ acce~/c us
as tenants and would no~ sign ~he lease.
e vouXd appreciate 811 tha~ you can do ~o refund back to us the
a~91ication fees that we have already paid. we appreciate the
time ~hat you have already s~n~ on our a~lication-
I can be reachg at 3~7-~226, Th~k you ~o~ your attention on
this ma~te:,
8incere:LY yours,
ITEM F
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?i =';/~''''
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 1992 i!
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF AMENITIES AND RECREATION BUILDING FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 13717 - WESTERN PROPERTIES
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract 13717 was approved by the
Planning Con~ission on February 14, 1990. The tract was approved for
the development of 394 condominium units within 52 buildings. There are
4 two-story building types. The project was designed as two distinct
villages, each with its own set of recreational amenities and
architectural scheme. The units to the north of the site will have a
contemporary appearance with siding, :3tucco, and flat tile roofing while
the units to the south will have a Mediterranean style with stucco and
s-tile roofs.
ANALYSIS: Since the project's approval, the applicant has decided to
market the tract as a "for-sale" product type instead of rental units
due to economic and market conditions - In accordance with this
decision, they have scaled'down the recreational building, redesigned
the recreation areas, modified the Spruce Avenue entry, and relocated
two buildings to eliminate the rental office and increase open space.
The Commission reviewed these proposed modifications on February 13,
1991, and conditionally approved the;m (see revised site plan, Exhibit
"D"). Final architectural revisions for the recreation building were
not reviewed or approved. In addition, the Planning Division has
reviewed plan checks of the rough grading plans and building elevations
for the project which are nearing completion- Also, the project has
received final map approval from the City Council. The project is not
subject to the new multi-family standards currently in place.
Since the modification to the site plan (February 14, 199 1 ), the
recreation building has been reviewed by the Design Review Comittee on
three separate occasions, July 18, 199 1 (McNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman ),
October 17, 1991 (Melcher, Vallette, Coleman ), and January 2, 1992
(Vallette, Tolstoy, Buller). The tot lot areas were reviewed by the
Design Review Committee on October 17, 199 1 (Melcher, Vallette,
Coleman), and January 2, 1992 (Vallette, Tolstoy, Buller).
Before you tonight are the final revisions to the recreation building
and amenity areas- The applicant is proposing to increase the square
footage of open space, number of spas, and area for the tot lots;
eliminate the sport court; and decrease the size of the recreation
ITEM H
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 13717 - WESTERN PROPERTIES
February 12, 1992
Page 2
building (see Exhibit "A-3"). The Design Review Committee reviewed the
proposed modifications to the common recreation areas and recommended
approval, except for the scaled-down recreation building. The Committee
recommended that the issue be brought before the full Commission for
discussion to determine whether or not the modification meets the intent
of the original project approval. Attached you will find support
information regarding this project (i.e-, original site plan from
January 14, 1990; revised site plan of January 13, 1991; letter from
applicant outlining the originally approved amenity package and proposed
plans, etc-). In addition, larger plans of the recreational areas and
amenities will be provided at the meeting-
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission review the
information- If the Commission determines that the recreation building
is acceptable, then the City Planner should be directed, by minute
action, to complete processing of the related plan check-
BB: ALH/j f s
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant and Discussion of
Amenity Packages
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan dated January 14, 1990
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan dated January 13, 1991
Exhibit "E" - Revised Site Plan
Exhibit "F" - Site Plan/Amenity Package
Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations for Recreation Building
Exhibit "H" - Original Main Recreation Building
Exhibit "I" - Original Secondary Building
/
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
1156 North Mountain Avenue [ P.O. Box 670 / Upland, California 91785-5008
714/985-0971 FAX: 714/949-6700
January 21, 1992
Anna-Lisa Hernandez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
Re: Tract 13717 Recreation Area Amenities
Dear Anna-Lisa:
I am providing you a square footage breakdown of the
recreation area amenities as you requested in your letter of
January 13, 1992, for those amenities that were on the
original approved site plan and_those now proposed.
ORIGINAL SITE PLAN: Designed as a "for rent" project.
The amenities were:
Primary Recreation Area: Pool @ 917 SF, Spa @ 68 SF, Deck
Area @ 2897 SF (no area was covered), and a Recreation
Building @ 6306 SF. The Recreation Building included Rental
Office Facilities @ 1383 SF, RestroomArea @ 881 SF, Living
Room @ 600 SF, First Floor Multi-Purpose Room @ 800 SF, Weight
Room @ 400 SF, Second Floor Multi-Purpose Room @ 400 SF, with
the balance of square footage in halls, kitchen, storage,
outdoor showers, stairs, etc. There was also a 770 SF second
floor deck area. The total square footage of the Primary
Recreation Area was 15,475 SF.
Secondary Recreation Area: Pool @ 512 SF, Deck Area @ 1990 SF
(112 SF were under a trellis), and a Restroom Building @ 801
SF. The restroom building included men's and women's
restrooms, storage room, pool equipment room and showers. The
total square footage of the Secondary Recreation Area was 3858
SF.
14-3
Anna-Lisa Hernandez
January 21, 1992
Page 2
Wading Pool Recreation Area: Wading Pool @ 1067 SF, Deck Area
@ 4316 SF (208 SF were under a trellis), Sports Court @ 1724
SF, and a Restroom Building @ 571 SF. The restroom building
included men's and women's restrooms, storage room, pool
equipment and showers. The total square footage for this area
was 12,570 SF.
Tot Lots: There were two tot lots; one @ 960 SF and one @ 820
SF.
Open Space Areas: There were two open space areas; one at
2420 SF and one @ 5281 SF.
PRESENT SITE PLAN: Designed as a "for sale" project.
The amenities are:
Recreation Area A: Pool at 837 SF, Spa @ 81 SF, Kiddie Pool @
348 SF, Deck Area @ 4987 SF (777 SF is under a trellis), a
Recreation Building @ 2772 SF, and a Restroom Building @ 476
SF. The Recreation Building includes a Meeting Room @ 1136
SF, Weight Room @ 520 SF, Restrooms @ 311 SF, HOA Office @ 138
SF, with the balance of square footage in vestibule, halls,
kitchen, storage, porches, etc. The Restroom Building
includes men's and women's restrooms, shower, and pool
equipment. The total square footage of Recreation Area A is
18,470 SF.
Recreation Area B: Pool @ 775 SF, Spa @ 72 SF, Deck Area @
2271 SF (485 SF is covered, 139 SF is under a trellis),
Restroom Building @ 366 SF. The Restroom Building includes
men's and women's restrooms and pool equipment. The total
square footage of Recreation Area B is 7057 SF.
Recreation Area C: Spa @ 89 SF, Deck Area @ 937 SF (139 SF is
under a trellis), and a Restroom Building @ 366 SF. The
Restroom Building includes men's and women's restrooms and
pool equipment. The total square footage of Recreation Area C
is 1956 SF.
Tot Lots: There are two tot lots; one @ 3563 SF and one @ 183
SF.
Open Space Areas: There are three open space areas; one @
5774 SF, one @ 4180 SF, and one @ 3558 SF.
Anna-Lisa Hernandez
January 21, 1992
Page 3
The following is a summary of the recreation area amenities:
Oriqinal Desiqn Proposed Desiqn
Pools 2 (1 @ 917 SF, 2 (1 @ 837 SF,
1 @ 512 SF) 1 @ 775 SF)
Spas 1 @ 68 SF 3 (1 @ 81 SF,
1 @ 72 SF,
Kiddie Pools 1 @ 1067 SF 1 @ 348 SF
Tot Lots 2 (1 @ 960 SF, 2 -(1 @ 3563 SF,
1 @ 820 SF) 1 @ 183 SF)
Pool and Spa 3 (1 @ 2897 SF, 3 (1 @ 4987 SF,
Deck Areas 1 @ 1990 SF, 1 @ 2271 SF,
1 @ 4316 SF) 1 @ 937 SF)
2nd Floor 1 @ 770 SF 0
Deck Area
Open Play 2 (1 @ 2420 SF, 3 (1 @ 5774 SF,
Space Areas 1 @ 5281 SF) 1 @ 4180 SF,
i @ 3558 SF)
Recreation 1 @ 6306 SF i @ 2772 SF
Building
Restroom 2 3
Buildings
If you have any additional questions, please contact me at
(714) 949-6741.
Sincerely,
LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Project Architect
JAC: cjc/dly20123
i
.Fr_,,. AfrO-ova4:~ 2-/i~Htl
TENTAT [ VE TRACT NO, 13717
.- - _ -- .,. ~' ;:.. .:.,.' ~. ......:, .-';'~'v.,,
~ ~ . . . -,
~...
.~ .. ~ ~-- ~., ~.:..:~,
~ :'L; Z',' .
:// ~'
1
///
,. ~, -- _ p' -:
Z
/
~ ,:,, : ~:~ .~ ...
I
I
I .
I
I
1
I
I
/-,,
u 'It
~'y441~ IT
/-/77
iI
Z
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
~DATE: February 12, 1992
!TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to
amend the Uniform Sign Program by adding two pylon signs, two
secondary identification monum{;nt signs, and five pedestrian oriented
' directory signs within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the
northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-
42-05, 06, and 18.
!BACKGRDUND: On February 2, 1989, the Planning Con~nission approved the original
. Uniform Sign Program for Terra Vista Town Center- On September 20, 1990, the
Commission approved the first amendment to the Uniform Sign Program regarding
the design of various sign items, such as the Edwards Theatre display case,
! reaffirming the sign criteria for sub-majors, etc- On July 18, 199 1, the
i Commission again amended the Sign Program which addressed the specific approval
iof signs for Montgomery Wards, Service Merchandise, and various directional
signs for the Terra Vista Town Center. The applicant is requesting an amendment
'i for the Sign Program to add those signs as discussed below-
AN A LY S I S:
]A. Secondary Idemtificati0n Monument (Sign Type Q-2) · Propose adding two
secondary identification monument signs as shown in Exhibit "B." The
! proposed signs are to be located at the west side of the first and second
" driveways off Town Center Drive (see Exhibit "E")- The purpose of this
i type of sign is to identify the Terra Vista Town Center and the Food Court.
] Coment: These two signs were previously reviewed by the Commission on
~ July 18, 1991, as directory signs- The Commission approved them with the
~ condition that they meet the criteria of the 60-foot setback from the
~ curb. The applicant is now proposing these two signs as secondary
' identification signs for Terra Vista Town Center and the Food Court
users. Staff found the concept of adding secondary identification monument
signs acceptable. Since the two driveways off Town Center Drive serve as
the entries into the shopping center, it is appropriate to have some sort
I of identification. The design of the monument sign is consistent with the
theme established in the center- However, the arrow symbol (see Exhibit
! "B") is unnecessary and should be eliminated as it strongly indicates an
I on-site directional sign. Also, staff recommends that the proposed sign to
~ be located at the west side of the first driveway off Town Center Drive be
moved to the east side (see Exhibit "E")- The reason is that the west side
of this driveway is part of Phase IV development where there is no specific
ITEM I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-12 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
February 12, 1992
Page 2
development proposals other than the previous concept of a design center.
Staff anticipates a future amendment to the sign program when Phase IV
develops.
B. Pedestrian Oriented Director~ (Sign Type V). Propose adding five
pedestrian-oriented directory signs as shown in Exhibit "C." The purpose
of this type of sign is to guide the shoppers to their destinations similar
to those directory signs in an enclosed mall. The design consists of an 8-
foot high by 6 1/2-foot wide metal grill work framing a directory cabinet
showing the map of the center and the listing of the tenants- According to
the applicant, the directory cabinet is double sided with one side being
used as a directory for the center, the other side being used as a display
window case for announcements such as special events, grand openings, etc-
Co~ent: Staff found the concept of adding pedestrian oriented directory
signs acceptable. However, there are several technical and design items
that need to be resolved. Such items as identifying the color for the
metal frame, the detailed design of the sign cabinet/display window case,
the placement of these signs, etc- Staff believes that these items could
de resolved at staff level subject to City Planner review and approval.
Another issue staff would like to point out to the applicant is that the
property owner shall be responsible to monitor and enforce illegal
temporary signs, such as flyers, that may be tagged onto the metal frame.
C. Pylon Si~ (Sign Type S-1 and S-Z). Propose adding two pylon arch signs
for identifying the Food Court and Edward's Cinemas as shown in Exhibits
"D-1 and D-2." One of the signs is to be located at the north side of the
circular drive and the other is to be located at the pedestrian entry off
the south side of Town Center Drive- The purpose of this type of sign is
to create an identity for the Food Court, according to the applicant-
Staff also notes that these signs would include the name of all Food Court
tenants on 6-inch high panels mounted on the side supports- No information
is provided regarding the materials used to fabricate the "Plaza de Cafes"
and "Edward's Cinemas" signs.
Cogent: The Commission had previously denied these same two pylon signs
at a workshop on July 18, 1991. The concensus of the Commission was that
the type of sign would detract from the plaza area- However, the
Commission stated that they would not object to the concept of providing
additional identity to the Food Court (see Exhibit "A," minutes from the
workshop of July 18, 1991).
The current Sign Ordinance gives the Commission the flexibility to consider
this type of sign for a "regional shopping center." However, other
alternatives are available which the applicant has not explored in
providing identity for the Food Court. One alternative is to place the
name of the Food Court "Plaza de Cafes" on the existing low planter wall
flanking the circular drive. In reviewing the last Uniform Sign Program
amendment, the Commission approved a series of signs for identifying the
Food Court that the applicant has not installed yet. They were as
follows: two directory monument signs at the landscape median island for
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-12 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
February 12, 1992
Page 3
the driveway off Foothill Boulevard and add the name "Plaza de Cafes" to
the shopping center identification signs at the signalized driveway entry
off Foothill Boulevard. The proposed pedestrian oriented directory signs
and the secondary identification signs will further identify the Food Court
and Edward ' s Cinemas.
D- A sign to identify the Greenway Trail at the plaza area within the Food
Court. Although this item is not part of the amendment to the Sign
Program, staff would like to alert the applicant of the need to install a
sign that identifies the plaza area within the Food Court as the terminus
of the Greenway Trail for the Planned Community (see Exhibit "F"). The
design and placement of this sign should be subject to City Planner review
and approval prior to the release of occupancy for the last building within
the shopping center ( not including Phase IV development ). In addition,
signs should be installed to properly direct bicyclists around the east
side of the Food Court (rather th~n through the plaza) and through the
center to Foothill Boulevard.
Color renderings of the proposed signs will be available at the meeting for
the Commission to review. In addition, a model will be available of the
Food Court and theatre with the placement of the proposed pylon signs in
order to show the scale relationship of the signs to the buildings and the
plaza area.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and
consider the proposed signs. If the Commission concurs with staff ' s
recommendations, then it would be appropriate to approve the two secondary
identification signs, with the condition that the arrow symbol be deleted; to
approve the five pedestrian oriented directory signs, with the condition that
the. property owner shall be responsible for the removal of any temporary illegal
signs on Sign Type V; and to deny the two pylon signs- The approvals should be
conditioned to require that the final placement and design of all signs shall be
subject to City Planner review and approval.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB :NF/j fs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission minutes dated
July 18, 1991
Exhibit "B" - Sign Type Q-2
Exhibit "C" - Sign Type V
Exhibit "D" - Sign Types S-1 and S-2
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan Showing Placement of Signs
Exhibit "F" - Page IV-54 of the Terra Vista Community Plan
CONp~IONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANy - A request to amend
the approved Sign Program by adding sign criteria for the Foodcourt, the major
users consisting of Montgomery Ward and Service Merchandise, and site
directory signs, located within the Terra Vista Town Center located at the
northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-421-05,
06 and 18.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented a brief staff report.
Norm Abplanalp, Montgomery Wards, showed slides of Wards' signage. He
explained to the Con~nission the concept and the marketing behind the
"specialty shops."
Commissioner Melcher questioned Mr. Abplanalp on how the signs are
constructed.
Mr. Abplanalp explained the construction details to the Commission.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked Mr. Abplanalp what he had heard from the Commission
throughout the entire review process for Montgomery Wards.
Mr. Abplanalp stated that all the signs including the specialty store signs
are registered trademarks. He said the mass and scale of the building were
designed to accommodate the size of the proposed signs.
Commissioner Melcher stated he would like to see overall elevations of the
Auto Express building in order to assess the proper scale end proportion of
the sign.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, asked the Commission if they would like to review
the signs one by one. The Commission agreed.
Sian TyPe T-1 - Montaomerv Wa~d$
Mr. Bullet asked the Commission whether they had any concerns with the
proposed wall sign at the east side of the south elevation.
The consensus of the Commission (3-0-2 with Chitlea and MeNial absent) was to
approve the Wards sign.
Siun Tvoe T-2 - Electric Ave
Commissioner Tolstoy was concerned about the black and turquoise stripes of
the graphic logo for "Electric Ave.'
Commissioner Melcher stated that the Town Center is a unique center and not a
neighborhood center. He had no concerns with the concept of the specialty
store signs like 'Electric Ave' or "Auto Express.' His concerns were with the
proper scale and proportions of the specialty store signs to the buildings and
the graphic underscores. He felt the colors with the graphic design create
confusion.
Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 18, 1991
Commissioner Vallette asked staff if the approval of this sign would set a
precedent.
Mr. Buller stated that in the past Commission policy has been not to accept
stripes and checkerboard designs.
Commissioner Tolstoy commented that the underscore would be acceptable if it
were modified to a plain line with the words 'Montgomery Wards."
Mr. Abplanalp stated that the design of 'the underscore is non-negotiable.
The consensus of the Commission (3-0-2 with Chitiea and McNiel absent) was to
allow the 'Electric Ave" sign under the secondary entry major sign. The sign
shall be 60 percent of the allotted sign area, length of copy, and letter
height of the Major Sign T~pe D. The issue of the black and turquoise striped
underscore for the "Electric Ave' sign was tabled to be discussed with the
Auto Express underscore.
Siqn Type ~-3 - Laroe Wall Sian for wards a~ the North Elevation
Mr. Abplanalp stated that the service entry in the back is also another entry
into the store.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he could make the Justification to allow a
sign at the north elevation since there are residents to the north.
The consensus of the Commission (3-0-2 with Chitlea and McNiel absent) was to
allow a wall sign at the north eleva'~ion under the secondary entry major
sign. The sign shall be 60 percent of the allotted sign area, length of copy,
and letter height of the Sig~ Type D (Major user).
$~an TYPe T-4 - Service Entry Sian
The consensus of the Commission (3-0-2'with Chitiea and McNiel absent) was to
approve the sign as submitted.
Sian TyPe T-5 - Auto ExPress
The consensus of the Commission was to keep this sign under the submajor sign
criteria and to accept the colors and graphic logo of black and white
checkerboard. The Commission also determined the colors and graphics of the
underscore for the Electric Ave sign was acceptable.
Mr. Abplanalp stated that he was also willing to reduce the size of the signs
for 'Electric Ave' and 'Auto Express,' including the graphic underscore.
Mr. Buller recapped the action of the Commission as follows: approval of the
Montgomery Wards wall sign, including the underscore at the south elevation as
submitted~ approval of the same Montgomery Wards wall sign at the north
elevation as a secondary entry major sign with 60 percent of the allotted sign
area, length of sign copy, and letter height of the Major User Sign Type D~
Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 18, 1991
approval of the Specialty store sign of "Electric Ave" including the black and
turquoise stripes graphic underscore as a secondary entry sign with 60 percent
of the sign area, length of sign copy, and letter height of the Sign Type D;
approval the service entry sign as submitted; and approval of the specialty
store sign of "Auto Express," including the black and white checkerboard
graphic underscore at the north and east elevations, as a submajor user sign.
The Commission moved on to review the Service Merchandise signs.
The Commission redesignated Service Merchandise as a major user permitting
signage to be under the major user sign criteria. The Commission approved the
proposed wall sign at the south elevation as submitted with the 6 foot letter
"S." The Commission did not approve the large wall sign at the north
elevation above the loading area.
Mike Ramondt, Service Merchandise, stated that he would propose a smaller sign
to identify the loading area for Service Merchandise.
The Commission accepted the proposal with the condition that the applicant
work with staff regarding size and scale of the small identification sign for
the loading area of the store. ·
The Commission reviewed the various proposed sign changes to the Town Center.
center identification sign. They also approved the two directory signs at the
main drive aisle off Foothill Boulevard and the two directory signs off Town
Center Drive with the conditions that the names on these signs be specified
adder
and the signs off Town Center be set back 60 feet from the curb. In ' ion,
they approved the small wall-mounted directory signs on the columns with
conditions that the number and location of these signs be specified.
The applicant agreed to the conditions of approval.
The Commission did not approve the pylo~ sian_ The consensus of the
Commission was that this type of sign would detract from the plaza area. The
Commission did not object to the concept of providing additional identity to
the Foodcourt.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 18, 1991
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE Q-2 SECONDARY IDENTIFICATION MONUMENT
QUANTITY (2) @ ENTRY DRIVES ON TOWN CENTER
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 3t-6"
NO. SIDES 2
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 8"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 3'-8"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION STRIP' OR FLOOD LIGHTING
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SIGNAGE PROGRAM
APL PROJECT NO. 85021-03 EXHIBIT A
AUGUST 6, 1991 ,~ % PAGE 23:2
O--O 0 o
L
6 0 ZL
_J;
C
n ::Olt ZF
' '= u u I.--F
,- O ......~ .< t
:o .......n,_,oz [
3rIN3AV N~,'~Yl-I
_1 _
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 199 2
TO: Chairman and Members of the, Planning Con~nission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 91-06 - 6DMES - A request for Preliminary
Development Plan, Final Development Plan, and Tentative Map
No · 15157 for 24 dwelling units on 26.26 acres of 'land
generally located north of the Southern California Edison
utility corridor and east of the extension of Haven Avenue in
the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence - APN: 201-043-28
INTRODUCTION: The subject project is a County referral. The Tentative
Tract Map is attached to this report for your information.
BACKGROUND: The proposed project lies within our Sphere of Influence,
approximately 600 feet north of the! City limits; and therefore, is
before the Planning Commission as an informational item. The
Commission's review is courtesy and all comments will be incorporated
into staff's correspondence to the C. ounty. The project is the first
application to be processed above Alta Loma in Section 14 subsequent to
County adoption of the Snow Drop Road Transportation Plan. The
applicant ' s request includes a density bonus for good design. The
County's Snow Drop Road Transportation Plan identified 11 potential lots
on the parcel as part of their "reasonable yield" study for the purpose
of road design and cost-
City staff requested that an EIR be prepared to discuss the application
in the context of the hazardous conditions identified on the site which
include slopes in excess of 40 percent and the potential for flood and
fire. Also, biologically significant stands of Coast Live Oaks grow
within three drainage courses which traverse the site · The site is
within the Alquist-Priolo Study Zone, but a seismic study indicates no
fault lines cross the property (see attached letter dated December 20,
1991 ).
On February 3, 1992, at the Developmerit Review Co~nittee meeting, County
staff reviewed the subject application and recommended preliminary
conditions of approval- A copy of those preliminary conditions was not
available at the time of this report. County staff originally requested
a focused EIR, but after further discussion with the applicant, agreed
to process the plan with a mitigated negative declaration.
The applicant expects to meet all County Development Review Committee
conditions by March and proceed to the County Planning Commission in
Apri 1 ·
ITEM J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CR 91-06 - GOMES
February 12, 1992
Page 2
ANALYSIS: The project application and the preliminary conditions of
approval are currently being reviewed by the appropriate divisions
within the City and an oral update will be presented at the meeting.
Adequate access for emergency vehicles, environmentally sensitive
grading on the site, adequate drainage across the site, adequacy of
flood protection for Rancho Cucamonga residents, mitigation of traffic
impacts on City streets, and adequate protection for the oaks are the
key concerns initially identified by City staff- Another concern is the
lack of meaningful analysis of cumulative impacts for all of Section 14.
Staff has raised the concern to the County that the application for 220
percent of the density identified as a reasonable lot yield in the
County's Snow Drop Road Transportation Plan will set a precedent for
development of Section 14. If this project is typical of future
projects with respect to lot yield, then it is anticipated that the area
may generate a total of 189 homes instead of the 123 previously
estimated under the Transportation Plan for a 54 percent increase.
CONCLUSION:
Staff invites comments by the Planning Commission. The Commission's
comments will be folded into staff's review of the project as it
proceeds through the County's Development Review Process- As time
permits, staff intends to keep the Commission apprised of all
development activity in our Sphere of Influence.
R~s~a~e ulc~
City Planner
BB:MB/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter dated December 20, 1991
Tentative Tract Map 15157 (provided separately to the
Commission)
T H E C I T f 0 F
RA NC HO C UC AMONG A
December 20, 1991
Ms. Carrie Hyke
Planning Department
County of San Bernardino
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182
SUBJECTz GOMES - REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING
TENTATIVE MAP FOR 24 DWELLING UNITS ON 26.26 ACRE8 OF LAND -
Generally located north of the SCE utility corridor and east
of the extension of Haven Avenue in the Rancho Cucamonga
Sphere-of-Influence (CR 91-06).
Dear Ms. Hyke z
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject application. At
this time, we would like to offer preliminary cosslants, primarily
requesting ~hat an Environmental Impact Report be prepared for the
subject application-
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCl~lS = - The subJ act ,application
* Will result in major change to topography through
develolMment of slopes in excess of 30 percent, including
extensive cut and fill, as well as the use of up to 30-foot
high acrib wallse to create bt~Llding pads.
· May lead to erosion of soils in the event that storm runoff
undermines fill slopes where fill slopes intersect the
natural drainage course.
· Will result in changes in natural drainage patterns where
drainage courses are rechanneled and redirected.
* Urban hardecape will concentrate the rata and amount of
surface runoff.
eWill result in the removal of an undetermined number of
na~tve oaks and s~camore trees.
· Will telova 26.26 acres of wildlife habitat, including deer
foragel the "natural drainage courses" if altered will no
longer co~nect off-site and, therefore, will no longer be
available as wildlife corridors·
MeOw Dennis L. S~o~ ~ Councllmen~Dm D~ne ~alii~ms
M~Vor ~Tem V~illicm J. ~exund~ CouncilmemO~ Pume~ J. Wright
JcCk Lure. ~CP. Ci~ Man~gm CouncilmemO~ Chcd~ J. 8uquet U
10500 Cnac Center [:Wn/e · PO Box 807 · RonchO Cucornongo. CA Qq 729 · (714) 989-185q · FAX (714)
Ms. Cartie Hyke
December 20, 1991
Page 2
* Will result in a change in the character of development in
the area, because the concentration of cut and fill pads
typical of flat land tracts is not consistent with ~he
single residence development which has occurred in Section
14.
* Will result in the alternation of several natural ravine in
that certain ravine will be graded over, end the three
remaining 40-foot wide drainage easements will not be
adequate to preserve the riparien character of the ravine.
Will result in substential additional vehicular movement in
Section 14, adding to the existing inadequacy of access-
Will impact ~overnment services, including fire, police,
schools, parks, and recreation facilities/ the degree of
impact should be adequately discussed and mitigated.
· Fire hazard is extreme in the ares, therefore, the
uncertainty of the adequacy of access to the site is a
serious potential impact. Uncer~ainties include off-site
dedication for the internal log~p road, size and adequacy of
improvements planned for the extension of Have Avenue, and
size, adequacy, and phasing of Snow Drop Road improvements-
· Hay result in storm water drainage impacts, because there
appears to be no provision for directing exit flows from
the site.
· Urban runoff may cause degradation of storm flows.
· Use of crib walls will create an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view.
· A S.O.P.A. ~rained archaeologist should resurvey the sits,
in particular, to look for Native American settlement or
encampsent.
· The potential impacts of the proposed application are
significant.
· The cumulative impacts of planned future developsent,
including the subJec~ applicatic~, within Secticu 14, as
described in the approved Snow Drop B~ad Transportation
Plan, are considerable. It shculd be noted that access
impacts are severe because under the Snow Drop Road
Transportatien Plan, developsent will precede improvement
of the road.
Ms. Cartie Hy~
December 20, 1~1 ,
Pa~e 3
For the aforementioned reasons, we recommend that an Environmental
Impact Report be prepared for the subject application-
Further, please add us to the notification list for this project,
including notice and ~nutes of Development Review Committee meetings-
We understand that this application will be scheduled for Development
Review Committee in February. We reserve the right to submit additional
comments on or before that occasion- Please let us know the date and
time.
Again, thank you for the opportunity' to comment on the above project.
If you have any questions, please contact myself or Miki Bratt at (714)
989-1861.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Principal Planner
Rick Gomez
Brad Bullet
Tim Johnson
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 12, 199 2
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT ON OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN (OALNP)
BACKGROUND: This report is intended to apprise the Commission on the
status of projects currently influencing the future of the Old Alta Loma
area- In addition, the report provides a tentative schedule of the
processing of the subject neighborhood plan. No formal action is
required by the Commission at this time.
The creation of a Neighborhood Plan has been a goal of the General Plan
for many years. In the General Plan, this community is defined as an
"are where the village of Alta Loma started and contains older
residences as well as newer community office buildings · · . bounded by
Base Line Road, Southern Pacific Railroad, Monte Vista Street, Archibald
and Hellman Avenues" (page III-89). The Neighborhood Plan as defined in
the General Plan included the retention of a historic feel and
neighborhood character of the area by the creation of a special
streetscape design as well as standards and guidelines for future
pedestrian oriented commercial development (page III-91)-
As part of the Historic Preservation Commission staff's work program,
the development of the OALNP began last year with a complete resurvey of
the target area. Initial results of the historic survey revealed a
total of 24 previously identified structures whose historical list
status required revision and 60 structures with possible historic
significance which were missing from the City's Historic Site List. At
the November 7, 1992 meeting, the; Historic Preservation Commission
adopted the recommended additions and changes to the Site List.
ANALYSIS: The primary catalyst for the commencement of work on the
OALNP comes in the form of the: Redevelopment Agency ' s proposed
rehabilitation of the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House (more
recently the home of the American National Can plant). After the
Agency received the initial feasibility study from the consultants,
Architectural Resources Group, escrow closed on the site in late fall of
199 1. After an in-depth adaptive reuse study, the consultants
recommended the rehabilitation of t'~e City's oldest surviving packing
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
February 12, 1992
Page 2
house complex for a mixed-use/low-income senior housing project. Their
investigation revealed that currently and in the future a market will
exist for affordable housing for the City's maturing population and that
the packing house is structurally and geographically a fitting location
for such units. Other uses in combination with housing were
recommended, including selected retail/commercial venues and a permanent
community services facility · Staff is now reviewing the firm' s
suggestions and will commence project development after receiving
approval from the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board-
CONCLUSION: Staff would like to make every effort to integrate the
development of the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House rehabilitation
project with the creation of the Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan. The
approximately four-acre mixed-use project could spearhead renewed
interest in the historic core of that community- Thus, an in-house team
composed of both current and advance planning staff have begun work on
the plan. You will find attached for your review and assessment a
tentative schedule for the drafting and finalization of the plan that
the team has compiled. The Commission will be an integral part of the
Plan's development and will have numerous opportunities for input and
participation, including the workshop to be jointly held with the
Historic Preservation Commission that has been tentatively set for April
29, 1992. The target date for aompletion of the Old Alta Loma
Neighborhood Plan is late November of this year-
Respectfully submitted,
ler
BB:AH :AW:mlg
Attachments: Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan Schedule
m,,;HIIALD AV
MIETNfiT ST
LAYTON ST /, ,~
LEYTON CT
ONYX AV
XllilklOOl AV