The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/03/25 - Agenda Packet ~ CITY OF ~, RANCHO CUCAh/K3NGA PLANNING COMMISSION AF, ENI - 1977 WEDNESDAY MARCH 25, 1992 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher III. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes ' February 26, 1992 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14121 - J. P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a recorded tract map consisting of 46 single family lots on 9.3 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue - APN: 202-211-48. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale/retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229-262-28. (Continued from February 26, 1992.) C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02 - JACK MASI B. A request to add an auto court use, consisting of automotive services and related activities, as a conditionally permitted use to Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. C. A request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include certain retail and service-related activities. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from March 11, 1992.) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHIBATA - A residential subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Related Tree Removal Permit 91-29. E. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES - A request to modify a previously approved tract map consisting of 13 zero lot line homes and 114 condominium units in order to change the concept of land ownership to create a total of 139 lots, located on 11.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive - APN: 227-151-15. F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - LA PARRY - A request to establish a silk flower and gift shop totaling 612 square feet within the historic Albert House, on 1.23 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10323 19th Street - APN: 1076-151-02. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL - A request to establish a traffic school in an existing building of 1,348 square feet, located on 3.8 acres of land in the Office District (Subarea 1) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan at 8746 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-102-32. H. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the subsequent Environmental Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475, a residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Staff recommends certification of the Environmental Impact Report. (TO BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 8, 1992.) I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06. (TO BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 8, 1992.) VII. New Business J. PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - Review of the proposed phasing plan for a previously approved commercial retail center within the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1- 15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, 20, and a portion of 59. VIII. Commission Business K. UPDATE REPORT ON FREEWAY LANDSCAPING L. BRIDGES - LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS IX. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14121 - J.P RHOADES DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a recorded tract map consisting of 46 single family lots on 9.3 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue - APN: 202-211-48. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14121_ was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 1989, and has since recorded. The Design Review for the tract was approved on February 28, 1990, for a period of two years as allowed by the Development Code. Extensions may be granted in 12-month increments for up to 36 months from the original approval date. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tract 14121 consists of 46 lots which average 5,500 square feet each. The typical lot dimensions are 50 by 100. Tract 14121 was the first tract created after new development standards for Victoria were adopted which increased the minimum combined side yard setback from 10 to 15 feet. The front and rear yard setbacks remained at 20 feet and 15 feet,' respectively. For the Design Review application, the applicant proposed the same product which was approved and constructed for Tract 13440, located at the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, in the Victoria Vineyards' area. The Design Review application, as originally submitted, met all of the new standards except for the required combined side yard setback of 15 feet. The Planning Commission determined that the proposed Plan 2 home is an innovative product because it includes an enclosed tandem garage space and a "pull- through" garage door which accesses the rear yard. Therefore, lots with the Plan 2 model could be approved with a combined side yard setback of 10 feet rather than the required 15 feet- The Plan 2 home is plotted on approximately one-quarter of the lots- ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 14121 -J · P · RHOADES DEVELOPMENT March 25, 1992 Page 2 B. Development Standards: The requirements for Low-Medium Residential Development have not changed since the original approval of this application. Therefore, the project is still in compliance with all development standards- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or nonconforming. B. The granting of an extension would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year time extension for the Design Review of Tract 14121 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Resp ', ly su ' ted, City anner BB: SR: js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Resolution of Approval for Time Extension J. P PJ-IOADE5 DEVELOPMENT 1801-C PN'kcourt Place, Santa Aria. CA 92701-5080 CITY 0 F P A ~., ,-: H ~ ',r, !'. ........:'~ A P.O. Box 1973, Saxtta Aria. CA 92702-1973 PL (714) 972-9944 FAX (714) 97;~-086,5 AM Project Manager/Consultant February 18, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA P lann fng Oel3artment Attn: Hr. Steve Ross P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: HIGHLAND VINEYARDS- TRACT 14121 DESIGN REVJ'EIf BOARD Dear Steve: PTease 7et thfs 7etter serve as an oFffcfa7 request For a one year extensfon oF our Desfgn Revfew Board a;l~rovaTs For Tract 14121. Due to a stow economy, our sales at Hfghland Vfneyards fn Rancho Cucamonga have been much s lo~er than exDected and ve have just started the pTan check process For Tract 14121. Thank you For your understandfng and sul~Dort For thfs extensfon. S fncere 7y, ProJect Nana~er/¢onsu l rant KTF/Jat KEN:ROSS TP, TRXCT N0.14111- ', : ', : i I CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ~ D~- PLANNING DIVISION Trrl.~. I, Or-A'flOt~ EXHIBIT: CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ~ 0 P-- -y' P,- / ~ 12..{ ........ PLANNING DI"I~I,$ION $/~-~: ~/~Q : mime LBq' mmtfATIQN I.IlaNT B.BVA1TGN 1 CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ITEM: De, ~'~-, '~'2-1 ~ ~_ PLANNING DIVISION 1TrLE: ~.e~TIc~- F:t,~;/~ "' 3N :: EXHIBIT: D.- ' [ SCALE: r]otlc- , · ~ CITY OF RANCHO. ~q, YCAMO NG A ITEM: "' PLANNING DIVISION TITLe. EXHiIIFT:D-;3- SCALF~ LET I.EVA11011 ~ m BFA11~M t ib CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ~ ,p,R-7',R./z//~_/ PLANNING DIVISION TrrLF~ ~_//~W7~£- ~,J I~_., _ EXHIBIT: D, ~ L~L ~ LBfrB. EVAllON ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ DIL 'F'I~- I ~1 '2--! . PLANNING DIVISION TTYLE: ~'~mr'Jc~- P/~ EXHIBIT: P - L/SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA n'EM: ~- ~ I ¥1Z./ ~ ~_ PLANNING DrVISION -ITrLE: ,~Z~t/'~J~, -- p~-~ 2,~5 ~__--'1N_ EXHIBIT: D "~ SCALE: f}~ --~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ITEM: i~R- "T/e- I t./I ~-~ ~ _.'.'F ...... PLANNING DIVISION TITLE EI, EVPrf~- EXHIBIT: D '~:~ SCALE: k'l~r~C ~ ,,:-- /~ -/2- CITY OF RANC~O. CUCAMONGAITEM: .... pLANNING DIVISION TrrLE -/3 /~ -/~ CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ITEM: p?---'~2- [t-fJ2-f PLANNING DIVISION ExH~srr:D -II SCALE= CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ITEM: PF-'TIL ..... PLANNING . DIVISION .ITrtS: -. --_ EXHIBF,:D - 12.. SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO-CUCAMONGA rYDl: P~ 7R-- !ql~ --- PLANNING DIVISION 11TLE: ~I,~A'fl0IJs - EXHIBIT: D - 13 SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO, CUCAIViONGA rrEM: ~"" PLANM NG DIVISION sxHzsrr:P-l~f SCALE: FlOlq~,= · ~-/~ CITY OF I1ANO,IO. ~q,TCAMONGA ~ i::)P_,-,,'TIZ- I qrz. I n F" PLANNING DIVISION 'ITt~E {~LEVkq'I0f~.~-PM'~ t-H)~m~4' .... '~ mm : I -' p -- , EXHIBIT:" SCA.[_;; · ,, A-2o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14121, LOCATED WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-24-48 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described Design Review for Tract 14121 on February 28, 1990. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project; and B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time; and C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code; and D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Pro~ect Applicant Expiration Design Review Rhoades Development February 28, 1993 for Tract 14121 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry ~. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14121-J.P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT March 25, 1992 Page 2 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PROM: PHONE NO. : P01 Carnival ~alb I CARNIVAL MALLS 2 I NI)EPENDENT CONTRACTORS ASSC)C I AT I ON 3 OF BUS I NESSMEN & BUS I NESSWOrvlEN 4 11530 SIXTH STREET ~ RANcliO CUCAMONGA 6 CALIFORNIA U.S.A. CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMOr~GA 7 ADMINISTRATION '=j taR: MAR 11 1992 1 ~. A. MAYOR OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA 12 DENNIS L. STOUT '~r 13 14 B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY MANAGER 15 JACK LAM, AICP, CITY MANAGER 17 C. COUNCILMEMBER DIANE WILLIAMS 18 19 D. COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA J. WRIGHT 20 21 E. COUNCILMEMBER CHARLES J. BUQUET II 22 23 F. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 24 JACQUELIN ~T. AMSLER, PRESIDENT 25 26 1. We, the undersi gned members of the Carnival Mai 1 ' s 27 Independent Association of Businessmen & Businesswomen have 28 opened ___ small shops at the letterhead address at which 29 location we have contracted for space to operate our small 30 businesses. 31 32 2. The composition of our membership crosses virtually all 33 racial/ethnic lines, with a majority qualifying for Minority and 34 al 1 qual t fyi ng as Smal 1 Businesses. 3. For any business to make sales and even have the possibility 37 of surviving in today's environment it is imperative that the 38 public at large be knowledgeable of the existence and location of 39 such of the business operations. 40 41 4. There are practical economic limits to the amount of money 42 that any small business can spend on advertising. Beyond that 43 point tastefully constructed signs and other methods are 44 necessary to alert the public to the existence of such business 45 operations which lead them to such a remote locations until they are well established. 47 48 5. The Carnival Mall's owner/operators have asked your offices 49 for the authority to erect signs at various locationS, to raise a 50 balloon above the building to aid individuals in finding the Mall, and to use Clowns with directtonai banners at various 52 locations to attract attention to the existence of the Mall, 1 53 until Carnival Mall is known to the public. 54 55 6. It is our understanding that the City of Rancho Cucamot~ga has 5F_. thus far failed to respond to our previous request to authorize 57 the erection of signs a balloon over the buildit~g structure or 58 any other method of attracting people to the Mall area. 59 60 7. While other Cities create economic enterprise zo~les and use 61 every rational methodology to bring and encourage the developme~t 62 of new industrie~ and ~ew busines to their areas to i~crease the E>3 tax base; at this very moment while we are struggling to keep our ~4 doors open in a remote area where at this poi~t in ti~e we have ~5 practically NO CUSTOMER TRAFFIC, and in light of the failure of 6~> the City to act or assist us, we are of the disti~ct opi~io~ that 67 Rancho Cuca~,o~ga is h,=,stile to small busi~ess~e~ at~d won',e~. 69 8. The failure to act favorably on our requests a~d/or to provide 70 the assistance and waivers of "what would be ~ice" type of 71 regulatio~s until we have traffic in our ..a'rea, would seem to 72 indicate either arrogance or atl the very least a lack of 73 sensitivity to the needs of the very people (Businessmen &. women) 74 who in the final a~alysis pay your salaries, pay for the 75 infrastructure of the City and create the diversity i~ shopping, 76 new ser v i c es an d emp I o~ment for a c onsi der ab I e number o f 77 individuals. 78 79 9. There has t~ot always been a tug of war between elected/hired 80 officials of local gover~me~t and businessmen when it con~es down 81 to making a decisions about "what is good for the community. In 82 small communities attention to the needs of the people are r~ore 83 carefully addressed, however as bureaucratic i~stitutions grow in 84 physical size they always become more arrogant and less attentive 85 to the needs of the people who pay their salaries. 87 88 10. Please keep in mi~d that that individuals co~stitute the root 89 base of a community, thus the focus or government should be o~ 90 what the individuals in a community need and are willing to pay 91 for instead of decisions virtually always out of co~text with 92 "what is good for the i~dividuals of the community". Also please 93 reme~ber that "there can be no public ~ood without individual 94 qood. t.e.m that is an axiomatic expression. 95 98 97 11. Using the police power of gover~lment to run roughshod over 98 the rights of individuals sub calore juris is evidence of the 99 City Servants biting the ha~ds that feed them. i.e., each of us 100 pay for licenses, taxes and provide a service in the con';mu~ity 101 that is needed and at reasonable prices. We should be able to 102 expect "assistance from the City" not opposition to our very 103 existence. 1 2 105 · 106 107 108 12. In our particular case: 109 110 a. We are located in an area East of Haven on Sixth Street just I I 1 short of the I5 Freeway with no foot traffic and virtually no 112 vehicle traffic during the eight (8) days per month we are 113 permitted to operate. 114 115 b. With only one small sign on the Mall building it is necessary 116 for our members to park their vehicles in front of the building 117 such that ir~dividuals who travel sixth street will at least think 118 the buildir~g is ir~habited. 119 120 13. The traffic count on Sixth street on Saturdays a,~d Su~days is 121 primarily limited to the vehicles owned by the owner/operators of 122 the Mall, the Mall employees and close family~.and friends. i.e., 123 the "SiXth Street from Haven to the Mall is ~ on . ~ AD" both days" 124 125 14. We ask your help and permission to do the following: 127 a. Permit us to park a 40' Trailer or sign bearing trailer on 128 the South East corner of Sixth Street at Haven [during our hours 129 of operation] [for up to one year], painted tastefully on both 130 sides with a Carousel, CARNIVAL MALL, with a large arrow pointing 131 East on Sixth street. 132 133 b. Permit us to raise a Balloon over the front of the building 134 which would enable individuals to find the location without' 135 difficulty. I 3~ 137 c. Permit us to use similar signs at two locations exiti~g the 138 10 and 15 Freeways. 139 140 d. Permit us to hire Clowns dressed in appropriate costumes with 141 Balloons, Banners, Flags and to hand passer-by with ir~formatior~ 142 sheebs on the Mail. 143 144 15. Rationale: 145 146 a. There are no businesses in close proximity to our location 147 with whom we compete and draw potential customer~ away from other 148 areas. 149 150 b. There are no business activities in the area which are open i 51 to the publ i c. 152 153 c. There are no traffic hazzards, problems in road conditions 154 and in fact the streets are probably the widest in R/C. 155 156 d. We pay for our l ice~ses, taxes and for the space we rent or 3 157 I ease. 158 159 c. We offer a wide ra~lge of merchandise and ~ervices which are 160 enjoyed by individuals who "only go to Swap Meets" to purchase 161 the merchandise they want. 162 11~>3 d. Our mernbership waists the opportunity to'grow in tile cornmunity 1E54 and to profit from the operation of their businesses, and to see 165 the community prosper. 1E>7 e. In our interface with the City to date, w~ have come to 168 believe that the Tail is trying to Wag the Dog. i.e., 'that'the 1~>9 City is acting in restraint of free trade in such a mariner that 170 their failure to authorize use time tested techt~iques such as the 171 errectiot~ of tasteful ~ig~s in locations which will britlg 172 business to us, ha~ doomed us to "sel f-destruct". At~ activity 173 that will contribute to higher unemployment, loss of license fees 174 to the City, lack of taxes paid to tile city~.atld loss of small 175 busitlessmen growing in the community. 1 177 f. The remoteness of the area in which we operate in no way 178 i~terferes with at~y other business activities. 179 180 16. Our members believe that it is best to operate within the 181 system "when it works", thus we would appreciate your undivided 182 attention to the very simple request we have made: 183 184 a. authorize our use of the hereinbefore addressed sigt~s, Clowns 185 and balloon erection such that our owner operators of small 18F_~ stores will have the opportunity to be successful in Rancho 187 Cucamonga and become ktlown for the services we bring to the 188 community and for the taxes we pay to continuously elevate City 189 Services. 190 191 Such that we might expect and receive equitable treatment from 192 City Government in time to avert disaster. i.e., closing of our 193 businesses, act on our request in "real-time". Let us know that 1'~4 your intent is not to act in restraint. of free trade. 195 19E> 17. Some of the biggest companies in California operate with 197 concessionaires leasing 'or renting areas within malls. Our 1'~8 activities are no different in this respect, however none of the 199 major malls are located in such remote area~ without signs to 200 lead the public to them. Just south of 6th street other 201 companies have flags flying and signs at the street front. How are 202 we different? 203 204 12. Please give our request your careful ~onsideration keeping 205 mind that traffic to our businesses will increase revenues to the 20E> City Government, increase employment, and increase the range of 207 activities members of the community can participate in. Bring 2~)8 your small children to the mall and see for yourself "what ca~ 4 209 be". 210 211 13. Our options are rather limited. We can petitio~ the Rat~cho 212 Cucamot~ga Government, we can go to the media evidenci~g the 213 impact o~ business, jobs and commut~ity activity resulta~t fro~ 214 the failure of the city to be cooperative a~d e~courage busi~ess 215 to prosper i~ the area, by denyi~g us the temporary use sig~s 21~ and we ca~ eve~ go i~to the courts at greater expe~se and stir up 217 the con~mu~ity, but we are resolved first to see what ca~ be do~e 218 by addressi~g the facts of reality to our ow~ Rancho Cucan~o~ga 219 City Gover~me~t duri~g a very serious period of' recessio~ or 22~} i~deed a depression that affects us all. Neither do a~y of our 221 members wish to see a "sig~ blight on the community". That is ~ot 222 what we are asking for, however there must be some relaxi~g of 223 the stri~ge~t rules if we are to exist a~d become a viable group 224 in the comn~unity. 225 226 227 Si~cer~ ~d .es tfully: 231 232 233 234 NE K~ 235 23~ ASSOCIATION MEMBERS SIGNATURES: 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 24~ 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 257 258 259 2~0 5 1~3 A.SSOCIATION MEM ERS SIGNATURES~ 1~5 1~9 · 170 171 172 173 174 - 175 I 7~ 180 191 195 1 197 1 1 200 201 20 20 20 207 208 209 21 215 c c RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?~!! STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 ; TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission FROM: Brad .Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11 ) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229-262-28. (Continued from February 26, 1992. ) ABSTRACT: This application involves a three-part modification to Conditional Use Permit 91-03 and relates to the operation of the Carnival Malls site- Part A is a request to expand the permitted uses within the site- Part B is a request to expand the permitted hours of operation during holidays. Finally, Part C is a request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays, in addition to the current weekend operations. These modifications relate to the existing Carnival Malls site, an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use. Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-03, approved by the City Council on July 3, 199 1, conditionally allows the use to locate within Subareas 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15 within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditional Use Permit 91-03 for Carnival Malls was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25, 1991, and the use began operation in November of 1991. Staff supports the approval of Parts A and B, with minor modifications, as they are consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan · However, Part C, the expansion of the hours of operation on Fridays, cannot be supported by staff as the applicant has failed to comply with the conditions of approval and lacks sufficient parking. This report reviews each request independently and provides the appropriate resolution for each. APPLICANT ' S REQUESTS: A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: The applicant has requested that the following uses be permitted to operate within the Carnival Malls site: travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, beauty or nail salons, and photography studios- Photography studios and travel agencies are listed under the Personal Services category. Mortgage brokers and real estate sales are listed under the ITS4 B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 2 category of Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services. Finally, beauty salons/nail salons are listed under the category of Convenience Sales and Services. (See Exhibit "F"). Staff Comments: All of the requested uses are listed under categories that are currently conditionally permitted within Subarea 11, with the approval of the Planning Commission. These uses will not adversely impact the existing or future uses within Carnival Malls or the site. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conditionally permit the proposed uses, as identified above, to locate within the Carnival Malls. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: The applicant is proposing to extend the existing permitted hours of operation to include, "ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as, New Year's Day, Valentine's Day, Lincoln's and Washington's Birthday, St. Patrick's Day, Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, United Nation's Day, Halloween, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day (and the day after), and the week before Christmas-" (See Exhibit "C-1.") Staff Comments: A majority of the days that the applicant is proposing to operate are not legal holidays- In general, most industrial and office businesses operate through all of the above identified holidays. However, it can be reasonably argued that most businesses shutdown or reduce operations on Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. There may be cumulative parking impacts to the existing light industrial users, and future users on the site if the request is granted as proposed. The parking study, submitted by the applicant in June 1991, indicates that there is a deficit of 85 parking stalls with all existing and future site users operating at the same time (see Alternative 3 of the attached Exhibit, "D") on a weekday- Additional impacts that may effect other site users are noise, traffic, and trash. In general, other site users are not negatively impacted by the indoor wholesale/retail comercial use because they maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m-, while the Carnival Malls site currently operates during peak off-set hours (i.e-, Friday nights and weekends). Therefore, the site is adequately maintained, and routine upkeep for the site is facilitated by the off-set hours. Based upon routine site inspections, these issues up until this point, have been adequately mitigated- However, use of the site by Carnival Malls on a majority of these holidays could lead to impacts to other site users operating at the same time- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the expanded hours of operation to include the following holidays only: Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. C- Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: In addition to requesting expanded hours of operation during holidays, the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission extend their current hours of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. (See Exhibit "C- 1." ) Staff Comments: The applicant currently maintains the following hours of operation: Monday through Fri day - 10: 00 a · m- - 5: 00 p.m. ( Incidental stacking of merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team- not open to the public- ) Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m- - Retail Sales Saturday - 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Sunday - 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Retail Sales The primary impact of allowing retail sales during the daytime hours on Fridays is parking. As discussed in Part B above, the parking study projected an 85-space parking deficit on site for all users operating at the same time on a weekday (see Alternative 3 of Exhibit "D"). The parking standards applied to this alternative are consistent with the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan and Development Code requirements- Therefore, staff cannot support the expansion because of the inadequacy of parking facilities on-site- OTHER ISSUES: When this project was originally approved, the Planning Commission found it important to establish a compliance review for the intended use- The condition requires that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, twelve months from the date of release of occupancy, to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and any other health, safety, and welfare issues ( see Condition No · 16 in Exhibit "G" ). Staff has been carefully monitoring the business operation since their opening in November of 1991. The applicant has been in significant compliance with the conditions of approval- However, staff has been working with the applicant on two outstanding compliance issues: (1) security and (2) business licensing- A. Security - Approximately one week after the project's opening in November 1991, Carnival Malls released their security personnel and are in violation of this condition. Security was to be provided, a minimum of two security personnel for the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area, in addition to the personnel/management team- Staff has not received any security complaints from the users, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 4 neighbring businesses, or the Police Department- This may be attributed, in part, to the sluggish economy which has curtailed their business volume. B- Business Licensing - The Planning Division and Business Licensing staff have worked very closely to ensure that all businesses locating within Carnival Malls are properly licensed. At present, approximately 38 percent of the businesses still in operation have not been licensed (see Exhibit "E")- Though the applicant has complied with the specific condition that a monthly list of businesses be provided to the Planning and Business Licensing Divisions, the intent of the condition has not been met. Businesses are operating without proper business licenses which means a loss of sales tax revenue for the City- Business Licensing has proved to be a difficult condition to enforce- In addition to the monthly tenant list, Business Licensing staff has had several on-site inspections on weekends in order to educate the vendors within Carnival Malls of the Business Licensing procedures- In reviewing this condition with the City Attorney, staff believes the language is as strong as it can be. Though these issues appear to be resolvable and are being addressed by the applicant, staff believes it to be important to raise these issues should the Commission find them germane to the applicant's request to expand the business operation. The condition requires that a review be conducted in November of 1992; however, the Commission may review a CUP at any other time deemed necessary to ensure compliance- RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT/POLICE DEPARTMENT: Both the Fire District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed use. Both departments have expressed no objection to the applicant's request. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A- That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located; and B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C- That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Part A and B, with modifications, of the applicant's request to expand the permitted uses and operate during specific holidays through the attached Resolutions of Approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays through the attached Resolution of Denial- However, if after your review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full compliance examination, then a public hearing date should be chosen and properly advertised to consider possible modification or revocation of the CUP. In that case, the applicant's request for expansion should be continued to the same date- Respec y submi ed, City Planner BB: ALH/j f s Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "D" - Parking Study Exhibit "E" - Business License Memo Exhibit "F" - ISP Land Use Summary Exhibit "G" - Resolution No- 91-80 Resolution of Approval for Expanded Uses Resolution of Approval to Operate During Specific Holidays Resolution of Denial to Expand the Hours of Operation December 10, 19~1 Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Anna-Lisa: After careful consideration of our operation and its impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Carnival Malls is applying to the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~or a MODIFICATION o~ its existing CUP at 1163U SIXTH Street. We are requesting the following: 1) Inclusion of Personal Service Sales in addition to New Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include, but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, personal care, ( beauty or nail care ), photography studios and other activities typical o~ a personal service nature. ~) Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as; ~EW YEARS DAY,_VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S & WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDAY, ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY, COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, yETERANS DAY, THANKSGIVING, the day a~ter THANKSGIVING and the week before CHRISTMAS. ~ ' 3) Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start at 1O:OO AM. instead o~ b:OO PM. and End at ~:OO PM. We are requesting this for the following reasons: 1) Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE SUB-AREA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion o~ the Total Use of the Vendors in our facility. In most other cities it is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It is also part o~ the EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS in the City o~ Rancho Cucamonga. Z) Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS in the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the same reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEEK BEFORE CHRISTMAS in that this is a period when people take vacations and huskhess in our area is generally light. ALL COMPARJ~BLE FACILITIES CHARGE 'EXTRA RENTAL' which means some of our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be tied up in FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE our TOTAL occupancy, customer tra~flc and overall park ng need~. 3) PARKING STUDIES DONE ( ON COMP2a~LE FACILITIES ) IN OUR INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A 'LIGHT RETAIL DAY". We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY is not a FAMILY SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS. T~ls is t~e reason t~at FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" in all comparable facilities. As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for t~e CUP, TABLE ~, ALTERNATE d3, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD'. Of ALL t~e requirements for parking availability the Limits under ALTERNATE #3 are the most RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS. IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE NOW{ T~anK you agaln for your KInd help. JRP/la INDOOR RETAIL MALt, Technical Notes Prepared for:. Prepar~i by:. 2020 North Tu~tin Avenue Santa Ana, California 92701 (714) 667-0496 Mmy 31, 1991 // ~ ~t/ /~ /~ INDOOR RETAIL MALL Technical Notes INTRODUCTION Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) has completed a pariclng study for the Indoor Retail Mall located at the northwest comer of Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Street in the City of Rancho Cucamongn. This project will occupy one of three existing buildings and share the use of the available parking with the adjacent buildings in the common parking areas. The project site is proposed to be developed with 103,~2 square feet of an Yndoor Retail Mall that would cater to families with a mix of activities for both shopping and entertainment (kiddy rides and television that includes sporting events and cartoons). The proposed hours of operation are 6:00 PM to 9:.00 PM on Friday, 10.00 AM to 8:00 PM on Saturday and 10:00 AM to 6.-00 PM on Sunday. The study approach involved an actual case study of the fluctuations in hourly parking demand for the proposed use to determine the time and extent of peak parking. Typically two or three sites are selected for case study, bsseci on ability to isolate the me and its parking, and then observed for two to three weekdays and a weekend. In this case, the project is unique and comparable developments do not exist However, some sirelist developments do exist as indoor swap meet uses. The Indoor Retail Mall parking demand is based on an actual case study of an existing indoor swap meet. The total hourly parking demand created by the proposed Indoor Retail Mall is then compared with the available spaces to determine if sufficient parking i~ provided. ANALYSIS The project site is currently comprised of a total of 203,365 square feet of commercial, light industrial/warehoming, and office uses (38,308 square feet of office use, and approximately 165,057 square feet of co~ industrial use) as ~mtrated in F~ure 1. Presently, the site is 17 percent occupied (34,800 square feet of commercial/light industrial). The variety of uses at this location presents a good opportunity for reciprocal or shared-use of the available parking by tenants. The site presently provides appfoximstebj 760 parking spaces. Indt~t Retail Mall 1 Ausa~Fossu Amom~s, Luc_ -I Imioor Swap Meet Case Study _ T_! A case study of actual parking demand and hourly accumulation for an indoor swap meet was conducted. Friday and Saturday were selected as representing the most similar peak parking demand ~T i for this type of development The site selected was: T! Stanton Indoor Swap Meet f 10401 Beach Boulevard Stanton, California r~l The observed hourly parlr/ng accumulation and percent usage are summarized in the following P--I table: An examination of this table indicates that a maximum of 107 spasm were occupied for the site on Saturday at 2.'00 PM. Based on 40,000 square feet of use and 107 parking spaces used, results Indoor Retail Mall 3 Ans0n-Fouat Amooatet tnc, -13 in a parking ratio of 2.68 spaces per TSF (107 spaces per 40.0 TSF = 2.68 spaces per TSF). For this analysis, a 15 percent surplus factor has been added to the observed rate which yields a parking rate of 3.1 spaces per TSF (2.6 spaces x 1.15 percent -- 3.1 spaces. Therefore, based on actual case study, the proposed 103,522 TSF indoor retail mall will require a paridng demand of 320 spaces (103,552 per TSF X 3.1 spaces per TSF: 320 spaces). Another sire in WoocLland FTilk was exJamined for use in the case study, however, security at that site would not permit counting of the parking. Off-site observations of the parking usage did indicate that the on-site parking provided (759 spaca) was more than sul:Fi~eat at this site to meet the demand. Using the site size of 150 TSF and 759 available parking spaces calculates to a parldng ratio of 5.06 spaces per TSF. (759 spaces per 150.00 TSF = 5.06 spaces per TSF). ladestriad 1%4s__nnfa_etl]rino/'~Var~hoesino Case Stody A case study of actual parking demand and hourly accumulation for an industrial manufacturingAvarehousing facility was conducted. Friday and Saturday were selected as representing the most similar peak parking demand for this type'of development. Two sites were selected: Regal Rattan, Rancho Cucamonga Pier 1 Imporu, Rancho Cucamonga The highest observed hourly parking accumulation and percent usage are summarizexi in Table 1. An examination of this table indicates that a msximum of 13 spaces (7'2 percent) were occupied for the site on Friday at 11:00 AM. These observed hourly parking demand ratios were used to determine the total hourly parking demand for the remainder of the industrialAvarehousing use (26,705 TSF) at the site,. Hourly parking accumulation percentages for office and the commercial/'tndustrial uses are derived from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) publication, 5hl~LElrjaRg, dated 1983 and other Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) parking studies (Le., Virginia Dare Study in Rancho Cucamonga). Indaxt Reuil Mall 4 Amtin-Foust Amocmtet Inc. Table 1 PARKING ANALYSIS - INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING/WAREHOUSING Re~al Pailart, Rancho C. ucamonpa Size:. 34.8 TSF Spaces ReqtUred: 18 (1/2000) HOUR WEEKDAY WEEICEND OF OBSERVED OBSERVED DAY ~ SPAW. S ~ SpA~-S 6mn .... ~ am .... 9am .... 10 am 72~ 13 0~ 0 11 am 50~/, 9 O~ 0 12 pm 61~ 11 O~ 0 1 pm 50~ 9 O~b 0 2 pm 44~, 8 O~b 0 3 pm 44% 8 O~ 0 4 pm 44~, 8 O~ 0 ~ pm 22~, 4 O~ 0 6 pm - - O~ 0 7 pm .... 9 pm .... 10 pm .... 11 pm .... nl Indoor Retail Mall 5 Amtin-Foust Associate, tnc. I The project site presently provides 760 parking spaces to serve the site land uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate for unexpected fluctuations in parking demand and parking turnover. With a 10 percent buffer, the center can accommodate a maximum demand for 691 parIcing spaces at any given time (760 spaces/110 percent: 691 spaces). The Urban Land Institute has found that reciprocal or shared use parking can result in a reduction of parking requirements as a result of land uses that operate during off-peak times of adjacent land uses. The parking demand for the project was ersmined using the retail (Alternative 1), the observed indoor swap meet (Alternative 2) parking demand and a 1:150 (Alternative 3) parking ratio for the project. Table 2 presents the demand rates for each of the site uses at any given time and the total parking demand based on the site uses under the three alternatives. Tables 3 through 8 s-mmarize the pwjected parking demand and reciprocal use rates for the three alternative site uses. The "net parking demand" column contains the estimated parking demand for the ultimate site uses based on shared parking and reciprocal use. As this tame shows, the m~rirn.m parking demand on a Friday evening would be 570 spaces (Alternative 1), 357 spaces (Alternative 2), or 609 spaces (Alternative 3). On a Saturday evening, the DlaXiDlnm parking demand would be 430 spaces (Alternative 1), 336 spaces (Alternative 2), or 707 spaces (Alternative 3). With a 10 percent buffer, the center would require a minimum of 627 parking spaces under Alternative 1, 393 spaces under Alternative 2, and 778 spaces under Alternative 3. These totals are well below the existing supply of 760 parking spaces, extzpt for Satin'day - Alternative 3 at 2.'00 PM. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A shared parking study, conducted by AFA, found a peak parking demand of 707 spaces for the site uses if the proposed project is required to provide a parking ratio of 1:150. The site presently provides 760 parking spaces. However, the CiW of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 Table SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WEEKDAY -- -- WEEKEND TOTAL TOTAL SIZE PARKING SPACF_~ PARKING SPACES LAND USE TSF R,E(~UIREMENT REOUIRED REOUIREMENT REOU1RED Industrial Occupied 34.800 1/2000 18 0 0 Vacant 26,705 lf2O00 13 0 0 Vacant t8.308 1/250 153 .68f1000 26 Reta~ 103.552 4/1000 414, 4/1000 414 TOTAL Occupied 34,800 1/21300 18 0 0 Vacant 26,705 1/2000 13 0 0 ODtcc Vacant Indoor Retail 103.552 3.1fl{M}0 310 3.1/1000 320 TOTAL 504 346 Almmali~3 llldllltfjl] Occupied 34.800 1/2000 18 0 0 Vacant :26, 705 1/~ 13 0 0 Vmant 3830~ 14'250 153 .68/1000 26 TOTAL 875 * 717 Indoor Retail Mall 7 Amtin-Foum Aaat}~ate~, tnc Table 3 Alternative 1 HOlY AC~'I'ION OF PARKlING II~rDOOR RETAIL ~ (.A.s Re~) OC~ VA~ VA~ VA~ N~ Ho~ ~U$~ ~U~ 0~ ~ p~n~ Day % S~ % S~ % S~ 6:~ ~ .... 3~ 5 - - 5 7:~ .... ~ 31 8~ 8:~ .... ~% ~ 18~ 75 171 ~ .... ~ 142 42% 174 316 1~ ~ 13 ~ 9 1~ 1~3 11:~ 50 9 S0 7 1~ 153 1~ PM 61 11 61 8 ~ 1~ 1;~ 50 9 50 9 ~ ~ 1~ 414 570 3:~ ~ 8 ~ 6 ~ 1~ 4:~ ~ 8 ~ 6 ~% 118 87% ~ 4~ 5:~ ~ 4 ~ 3 47~ ~ 6:~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 375 7:~ .... 7% 11 8:~ .... 7~ 11 ~% ~ 371 ~ .... 3~ 5 61% ~3 ~8 1~ .... 3~ 5 11:~ ...... ~ 54 54 1~ ~ ........ ~P~GD~ 570~1~ ~ U~ ~ ~m~ ~ P~" 1~. Table 4 Alternative 1 HOURLY ACCUMU'LATION OF PARK:]~G tNDOOR RETAIL MALL (As RettU) ~ I OCCUPI~D VACANT VACANT VACANT Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAI~ Paddnl Of Day % St-,'~ % S~---,-- % Spaca % Spaca Demand I 6:00 AM .... ~ .... 7:00 .... 8:00 .... 60~ 16 10~ 41 57 I 9:.00 .... 80~ 21 30 124 145 10:00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 45% 186 207 11:00 0 0 0 0 100~ 26 73% 302 328 12:00 PM 1 ~ 0 0 100~ 26 85~ 352 378 I 1:00 0 0 0 0 809b 21 959f~ 393 414 -w--- 2:00 0 0 0 0 60~ 16 1009b 414 430 3:00 0 0 0 0 40~ 10 100~ 414 424 4:00 0 0 0 0 40~ 10 909b 373 383 I 5:00 0 0 0 0 20~ 5 75% 311 316 ~ 6:00 .... 20~ 5 6.59~ 269 274 7:00 .... 20~ 5 60% 248 2~3 8:00 .... 20~ 5 55~ 228 233 ~_.~__ 10:00 ...... 11:00 ...... 1391, S4 ~4 12:00 AM ........ MAXIMUM I'AIHClNG DEMAND: 430 ~mmm -, 2:00 PM -~ Souse: UFewml,mmtlmUm~"SMml?m~limi"t~8'y' Aurora-From Amocimm, lar,, "Virlb~ Dm~ !'m~-_- Smay2 1W. · :t ~ In&xt Retail Mall 9 Aumn-Fo~t Aaaonates, tnc, Table 5 Alternativ~ 2 WEEKI)AY HOI.TRI.Y ACCUMUI.ATION OF PAR.KING INDOOR RETAIL MAIL OCCUPIF_,D VACANT VA~ INDOOR Net Hour INDUSTRIAl. llN'DUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAI~ Parking Of Day % S~-,m__~*_ % Sl~_,,~ % S~rm~,m % Sparta Demand 6:00 AM .... 3~ 5 - - 5 7:00 .... 20~ 31 - - 31 8:00 .... 6391, 96 - - 96 9:.00 .... 939f9 142 - - 142 10:00 72% 13 72~ 9 100~ 153 17% 54 239 11:00 509f9 9 50~ 7 lO0~b 153 42% 134 303 19-00 PM 61% 11 619~ 8 90~ 138 50~b 160 317 1:00 50~ 9 50~ 9 90~ 138 50~ 160 316 2:00 44~b 8 449~ 6 9'796 148 60~ 192 354 3:00 44% 8 4496 6 979~ 148 61% 195 357 4:00 ,$4% 8 44% 6 7'7% 118 69~ 221 353 5:00 22'9(~ 4 22'96 3 47% 72 65% 2,08 287 6:00 .... 23% 3f 6,5% 208 243 7:00 .... 791, 11 - - 11 8:00 .... 79(, 11 - - 11 9:.00 .... 3% 5 - - 5 10:00 .... 39(, 5 - - 5 11:00 ......... 12:00 AM ......... MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND:. 3t7 sireram at 3-00 PM Austin-Foust Amociatm, Inc, 'V'rlinia Da~ Park~ Study; 1989. Table 6 Alternative 2 HOURLY ACCLrhlTOLATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MAIL OCCUPIED VACANT VAC_.ANT INDOOR Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Parking 6:00 AM ......... 7:00 .... 209f9 5 - - 5 8:00 .... 60~ 16 - - 16 lO:.OO 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 209l, 64 85 11:00 0 C 0 0 100~ 26 63~ 202 228 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 100~ 26 7091, 224 250 l :00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 84~ 269 290 ~'00 0 0 0 0 60~ 16 100~ 320 336 3:00 0 0 0 0 409f~ 10 90~ 288 4:00 0 0 0 0 40~ 10 949l, 301 311 5:00 0 0 0 0 2091, 5 90~ 288 293 6:00 .... 20~ 5 719l, 227 232 7:00 .... 20~ 5 - - 5 8:00 .... 20t 5 - -' 5 9:.00 ......... 11:00 ......... 19'00 AM ......... MAXIMUM PARKING DF. MAND:. 336 spaan at 9.00 PM Sounz: Urban Land Institute, ~ Parlntnl,' 1~7. Indoor Retail Mall 11 Amtin-Foust AMoctatet Inc. Table 7 Alternative 3 WEEKDAY HOURLY ACCLrMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL (1:150) OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT INDOOR Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Parking Of Day % SVe_~.- % S~___~'~ % S~t~ % Spaces Demand 6:00 AM .... 3% 5 - - 5 7:00 .... 20% 31 - - 31 8:00 .... 6~% 96 - - 96 9:.00 .... 9~% 142 - - 142 10:O0 72'~, 13 72~, 9 1O0~ 153 17% 118 11:00 50~ 9 50% 7 100~ 153 42% 290 459 12;00 PM 6196 11 61% 8 90~ 138 5096 346 .503 I 1:00 509~ 9 50~X9 9 90% 13~ 509~ 346 502 2:00 44% 8 4~% 6 97~, 148 60% 415 577 3:00 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148 61% 422 584 4:00 44% 8 4~% 6 77% 118 69~ 477 609 5:00 7.2% 4 2.2e~, 3 47~[, 72 65% 449 528 6:00 .... 2.3% 35 65~i, 449 4~, 7:00 .... 7% 11 - - 11 8:00 .... 7'~, 11 - - 11 'l 9:.00 .... 3% 5 -- - 5 10:.O0 .... 3% 5 - - 11:00 ......... 17-'00 AM ......... 1 MAXIMUM PARF,/NG DEMAND:. 609 spacm at 4:00 PM 'l Sourc~ Ufean Land Institute., "Shared Parkin&" 1967. Austin-Foust Asaocia~ tnc, '%rulinia Da~ Parking Study,' 19S9. 1 [adoor Re~il Mall 12 Auatin-F~ami ~iet Lnt_ Table 8 Alternative 3 HOURLY ACCUMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL (1:150) OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT INDOOR Ne~ Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Paztang Of ~ay % SI~-C"" % S~,',"- % S,,~,~ % Spaces 6:00 AM ......... 7:00 .... 20% 5 - - 5 8:00 .... 60~ 16 - - 16 9:.00 .... 80~ 21 - - 21 10:00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 20~ 138 159 Ix:00 0 0 0 0 100~ 26 63% 435 461 1~'00 PM 0 0 0 0 100~ 26 70~ 48~ 510 1:00 0 0 0 0 80% 21 84% 580 601 2:00 0 0 0 0 60~ 16 100'~ 691 707 3:00 0 e 0 0 40~ 10 90~ 622 632 4:00 0 0 0 0 40~ 10 94,% 650 660 5:00 0 0 0 0 ~ 5 90~ 622 627 6:00 .... ~ 5 71% 491 496 7:00 .... 20~ 5 - - 5 8:00 .... 20~ 5 - -. 5 9:.00 ........ ' 10:00 ........ 11:00 ......... I?.~0 AM ......... MAXJMUM PARKING DEMAND:. 707 ~ ~t 2:00 PM Soun:c: Urb~ I. and lintirate, "Sirerot Pro'Ida&' 196'7. Auatm-Fou.t ,umocate., ~ 'V'qima Dare Produg Study." Indoor Refafi Ma~ 13 Am~n-Foust Asaocmtet tac. _! -I percent buffer which reduces the maximum allowable demand to 691 spaces. A parking ratio of 1:150 for the proposed project building plus the other site uses would exceed the city's allowable parldng --1 demand by 16 spaces. However, case studies indicate that a parking requirement between 3.1 and 5.1 would be snf~cent for the proposed use. ! The above findings indicate that providing for 691 parking spaces will be adequate to serve I the anticipated parking demand for the pwposed project and other site uses in a shared parking environment- The analysis concludes that: I ® Case studies indicate the Indoor Retail Mail would have a peak parking demand of 3.1 spaces per TSF for a total of 320 parking spaces. I · Case studies indicate the industrial manufacturing/warehousing use would have a peak pesking demand of .5 spaces per TSF for a total of 18 parking spaces. d · The inclusion of an Indoor Retail Mall and the vacant office and commercialAight industrial uses would have parking requirements at the immediate project site of 681 if parking spaces. · The exiting site presently provides for a total of 760 parking spaces. t · The City of Rancho Cuc, amonga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate for unexpected fluctuations in parking demand and parking turnover which would provide · for a peak parking demand for the entire center of 691 spaces. t · The peak weekday parking demand for the site is 609 (Alternative 3, parking ratio of 1:150) space~. at 4.-00 PM and the peak weekend parking demand is 7(Y7 (Alternative 3, parking ratio of 1:150) spaces at 2.-00 PM, based on ULI guidelines and case studies. · SneFicient available parking is provided at the subject location. Indoor Retail Mall 14 Amtm-Fomt A~soaate~ Lnc. .,-! -.,.-! Trafflc Data Services, Inc. ~ I PARKING STUDY ,-qr-,--*l LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPNEET CITY:STANTON DATE: 5/17/91 DAY: FRIDAY FILENANE:O412304A ,-! .......................................................................................... Ttme SECTIONS pertod Beginning A B C O E F G H TOTAL # OF NARKEO PARKING -~--I SPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 27 193 7:00 AN i 7:30 AM 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AM I9:30 AN ~ ' 10:00 AN 3 0 2 3 0 10 0 ,- 10:30 AN 11:00 AN 9 5 8 10 0 13 0 45 I 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 0 4 10 14 5 21 0 54 12:30 PN I 1:00 PN 3 3 7 16 5 19 0 53 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 4 1 9 26 8 16 0 64 I 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 3 3 7 Z9 2 21 0 65 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 3 3 11 29 8 20 0 74 I 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 4 2 11 32 4 17 0 70 5:30 PN '~1 6:00 PH 4 2 11 30 5 17 0 69 6:30 PH 7:00 PN 7:30 PN I CONNENTS: SECTION G - STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST '1 --1 -I -I I Traffic Data Services, Inc. ~'~ PARKING STUDY LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPMEET CITY:STANTON '1 DATE: 5/29/91 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME:O412305A Time SECTIONS I Period Beginning A B C 0 E F G H TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING '1 SPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 Z7 193 7:00 AN I 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM ~ 9:00 AM 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 0 1 6 14 1 I 0 23 10:30 AM t 11:00 AM 0 2 5 19 3 11 0 40 11:30 AM 1Z:O0 NOON 1 2 5 Z4 4 21 0 57 t12:30 PM 1:00 PM 0 2 6 23 4 15 0 50 1:30 PM t 2:00 PM I 2 5 25 2 10 0 45 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 2 5 25 3 15 0 50 3:30 PM 4:00 PM I 3 8 25 3 9 O 49 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 0 2 7 26 2 10 0 47 I 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 0 2 7 22 3 8 0 4Z 6:30 PM t 7:00 PM 7:30 PM q COMMENTS: SECTION G · STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST I Traffic Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY I LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPMEET CITY:STANTON DATE: 5/25/91 DAY: SATURDAY F[LENAME:O412306A I ............................................................................. Ttme SECTIONS Period IBeginning A B C 0 E F G H TOTAL I OF MARKED PARKING ISPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 27 193 7:00 AM I7:30 AM 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AM I9:30 AN 10:00 AM 0 0 4 14 2 1 0 21 I0:30 AM I11:00 AM 3 1 10 34 7 12 0 67 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 4 I 12 34 5 19 0 75 i12:30 PM I:00 PM 8 2 11 33 16 20 0 90 1:30 PN 2:00 PN 6 5 10 36 25 25 0 107 I 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 8 3 10 34 19 22 0 96 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 6 4 10 36 20 24 O 100 I 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 6 2 11 34 ZO 23 0 96 5:30 PM I6:00 PM 6 3 lO 30 11 16 0 76 6:30 PM 7:00 PM "1 7:30 PM "1 COMMENTS: SECTION G · STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST '1 I Traffic Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY LOCATION: NIV CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/17/91 OAY: FRIDAY FILENAME: 0412301B .................................................................................. Time SECTIONS period Beginning A 8 C D E F G TOTAL t OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 111 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AN 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 0 0 11 I I 0 13 10:30 AM II:00 AM 0 0 8 I 0 0 9 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 0 0 10 1 0 0 11 12:30 PM l:OO PM 1 O 8 0 O 0 9 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 0 O 8 O O 0 8 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 3:30 PN 4:00 PM 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM COMMENTS: 1 I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY LOCATTON: NIt CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/22/91 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME: 0412302B Ttme SECTIONS Period Beginning, A B C O E F G TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: IIZ 9% 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AN 7:30 AM 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AN 9:30 AN lO:O0 AN 0 0 8 0 2 0 I0:30 AN ll:O0 AN 0 0 8 0 2 0 lO 1~:30 AN I2:00 NOON 0 0 8 0 2 0 lO ~2:30 PN ~:00 PN 0 0 8 0 2 0 1:30 PM Z:O0 PM 0 0 7 0 I 0 8 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 0 0 7 0 I ¢ 0 8 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 5:30 PN 6:00 PN 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PN COMMENTS: J _i Traffic Data Services, Inc, PARKING STUDY _1 LOCATION: N/W CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/18/91 DAY: SATURDAYFILENAME: 0412303B I .................................................................................. ' Time SECTIONS Period I Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL ! OF'MARKED PARKING i SPACES PER SECTION: 111 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AM 7:30*AM I 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM I 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AN 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 11:30 AM 13:00 NOON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM I I: O0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 PN 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 3:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 PM 4:00 PN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 4:30 PM S:O0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S:30 PM I 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PN I 7:30 PM 1 COMMENTS: '1 Trafftc Data Services, [nc. PARKZNG STUDY LOCATZON: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST C[TY:RANCHO C~ ANONGA DATE: 5/17/91 DAY: FRZDAY FZLENAHE:0412301C Ttme SECTZONS Pertod Beginning A B C D E F G H TOTAL I OF NARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTZON: 83 126 30 42 58 63 39 441 7:00 AN 7:30 AN 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AN 9:30 AN -,,,, 10:00 AN 42 82 16 5 7 0 0 2 154 10:30 AM 11:00 AN 45 84 16 3 7 0 0 0 155 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 39 68 17 4 5 0 0 0 133 12:30 PN 1:00 PN 34 65 15 4 4 0 0 0 122 1:30 PN 2:00 PN 21 41 12 4 4 0 0 I 83 2:30 PH 3:00 PN 10 28 14 3 4 0 0 0 59 3:30 PN 4:00 PN g 24 4 3 3 0 0 0 43 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 6 11 I 3 2 0 0 0 23 5:30 PH 6:00 PN 5 7 I 3 2 0 0 0 18 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PN CONNENTS: SECTXON H · STREET PARKXNG : I Trafftc Data Services. Inc. i PARKING STUDY LOCATION: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TN ST CITY:RANCHO C~ANONGA DATE: 5/22/91 DAY: WEDNESDAY FZLENANE:O41230ZC Ttme SECTIONS Period Beginning A B C 0 E F G H TOTAL t OF NARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 83 126 30 42 58 63 39 441 7:00 An 7:30 An 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AM - 9:30 An 10:00 AN 42 74 9 3 4 0 0 2 134 10:30 AN 11:00 An 50 68 10 3 4 0 0 6 141 11:30 AN 12:00 NOOn S1 57 9 3 4 0 0 5 129 12:30 pn i:00 PN 33 45 13 3 4 0 0 6 104 1:30 Pn g:00 Pn 14 30 15 2 3 0 0 6 70 2:30 PN 3:00 pn 12 26 12 2 3 0 0 s G0 3:30 pn 4:00 pn 12 22 11 I 3 0 0 3 52 4:30 PN S:O0 PN 12 18 9 I 4 0 0 0 44 5:30 PN 6:00 PN 10 19 ~ I 3 0 0 0 39 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PN CONNENTS: SECT[ON H · STREET PARKZNG _J _J Trafftc Data Services, Znc. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY:RANCHO C~ AHONGA DATE: 5/18/91 DAY: SATURDAY FILENAHE:0412303C Ttme SECTIONS Period Beginning A B C D E F G H TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 83 126 30 42 58 63 39 441 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM 20:00 AM 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AN 13:00 NOON 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 PM 1: O0 PW 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 Z:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:30 PM 5:00 PW 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM COMMENTS: SECTION H · STREET PARKING THERE WAS ONE CAR (A SECURITY GUARD) PARKED AND SITTING IN CAR THROUGH ENTIRE COUNT 1i Trafftc Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY I LOCATION: PIER t IMPORTS OISTRZBUTZON CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCAHONGA DATE: 5/%7/91 DAY: FRIDAY FILENAME: 0412301A I .................................................................................. Ttme SECTZONS Pertod I Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL I OF MARKED PARKING i SPACES PER SECTION: 184 184 7:00 AM 7:30 AM I 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM I 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 26 26 I0:30 AM 11:00 AM 25 25 I 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 26 26 12:30 PM I 1:00 PN 20 20 1:30 PM 2:QO PM 26 26 I 2:30 PM 3:00 PN 24 24 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 3 3 I 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 1 1 5:30 PN I 6:00 PN 1 1 6:30 PN 7:00 PM I7:30 PN tCOMMENTS: Trafftc Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: PIER I IMPORTS DISTRIBUTION CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA OATE: 5122/91 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME: 0412302A Ttme SECTIONS Pertod Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 184' 184 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM :00 AM 45 45 ,d:30 AN 11:00 AM 39 39 11:30 AN 1Z:O0 NOON 40 40 1Z:30 PM I:00 PN 40 40 1:30 PN 2:00 PM 49 49 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 46 46 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 2 2 4:30 PM 5:00 PX I 1 5:30 PN 6:00 PN I I 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM COMMENTS: ----I -I -I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. I PARKTNG STUDY ~1 LOCATZON: PZER 1 ZNPORTS DISTRZBUTION CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCAHONGA DATE: 5/18191 DAY: SATURDAY FILENANE: 0412303A __! Ttme SECTZONS Pertod I Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL I OF NARKED PARKZNG """"1 SPACES PER SECTZON: 184 184 7:00 AN 7:30 AN ~ I 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AN 1 9:30 AN 10:00 AN 0 O 10:30 AN - 11:00 AN 0 0 ,,:,o ,, 12:00 NOON 0 0 12:30 PN ~t 0 ~ I: 00 PN 0 Z:30 PN 2:00 PN 0 0 q 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 0 0 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 0 0 ~'q 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 0 0 5:30 PN :q 6:00 PN 0 0 6:30 PN 7:00 PN jq 7:30 PN CONNENTS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 4, 1992 TO: Anna Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner FROM: Lisa Harms, Business License Technician SUBJECT: REGARDING LICENSED AND UNLICENSED BUSINESSES IN THE CARNIVAL MALLS Using the January 6, 1992, vendor list provided by the Carnival Malls, I came up with the following facts: Total amount of businesses licensed as of 1/28/92 108 )('' Total amount of businesses licensed and still operating 51 Total amount of businesses unlicensed 32 I will be contacting Carnival Malls to insure that the 32 unlicensed businesses obtain their business license with the city of Rancho Cucamonga. TABLE II1-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA I PERMITTED USE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted Land Use* I. G: GI el GI el IP IP GI u~, GIi~G~ IP G: el! .1~ Ip Ip USE TYPES Subareas HO I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10]|11112 13 14 15' 16 17 MANUFACTURING Custom Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Heavy · OFFICE ~OFESSIONALa DESIGN & RESEARCIt Professional/Design Services · ~ +~ · · t + · + ~ · · WHOLESALE} STORAGE & DISY~IBU~ ION ~ s~s~ Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Heavy ~ · ~ · COMMERCIAL Animal Care ~mtlve Root St~ege ~tomotive Rental/Leasing · · · Ai~Uve/Ught T~k Repelnor Automotive/Truck Repair-Major · Automotive Service Station Building Contractor's Storage Yard · Building &Lighting EquipmeM Supplies&Sales; · + · + ~ · · + · + + · ~ ~y ReM & h~e · Business Suppod Seaices · · + · · + · · · + + · · · · + · · --Convenience Sales & Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales + + + + +~ + + + + ~ + Food & Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales &Rentals + + + + + + + + · Laundry Services · · · · · · · p Personal Services RecreatioMI Facilities + Scrap Operation CIVIC Ad~m~ve CIvic ~,l¢em · Cultural · + + ~ + + + + + Exte~e ~ ~mmty Fm~mem Flood Control/~ility Co~idor · · · · · · · · · · · '~C Assembly + Public Safety & Utility Services · IP-Industrlal Park GI-General Industrial MI/HI-Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial~ HO-Haven Ave. Overlay District HI-Heavy Industrial s / 0/8 III-5 /~ _~ 8/15/90 3/06/91 RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT NO. 91-03 FOR A 103,552 SQUARE FOOT INDOOR WHOLESALE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL USE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 11, INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AT 11530 SIXTH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-026-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 8th of May 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) On the 8th of May 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed associated file Modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-06 to amend the original file, allowing more intensive uses than those originally approved. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior'to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 8,.1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with 3 research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and '{41P i T PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. (c) The application contemplates the operation of an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use within an existing 103,552 square foot industrial building. (d) The application contemplates public hours of operation from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. (e) The applicant proposes to maintain office hours from Monday through Friday and permit incidental stocking of merchandise for vendors only. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Co~unission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings andsconclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below= 1) A minimum of four maintenance personnel will be on-site during public hours of operation. 2) Trash shall be picked up daily to ensure proper maintenance of the entire site. 3) Sufficient trash receptacles, compatible with existing pedestrian furniture, shall be added directly adjacent to, and interior to, all public entries.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 3 4) All ~raffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 5) A minimum of two security personnel shall be on- site upon the release for occupancy of the wholesale/retail commercial use up to the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area. Upon occupancy of each of the proceeding 12,500 square feet, one additional security person shall be provided until full occupancy -is reached. Security personnel shall secure both indoor and outdoor activities. 6) A management staff team of four to six people shall be on-site during operational hours upon occupancy of the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area. One additional management staff person shall be added upon occupancy of every proceeding 12,500 square feet of leasable area. 7) The swap meet organizer shall provide the Business License Department with an updated list on a monthly basis of all vendors. If the organizer does not supply the list, they will be responsible for business license payments for vendors. The list shall include the mailing addresses for all vendors. 8) In conjunction with the Business License process, all vendors shall be required to obtain a retail sales tax permit (Seller's Permit) through the State Board of Equalization, prior to obtaining a City Business License. The vendor shall be required to produce a retail/wholesale sales number to the Business Licensing Division upon application. 9) The management entity shall notify and monitor every vendor of their responsibilities and obligations for licensing and record keeping in compliance with the appropriate government agencies, including but not limited to, the City and the State Board of Equalization. 10) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Building and Safety Department will require plans to be prepared for the plan check .review process. The plans must provide compliance with the Uniform Building, Plumbing, and the Mechanical Codes and the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 4 11) All signage, in conjunction with the swap meet use, will be subject to the City's Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program in place on the project site-I 12) Any special outdoor event, such as a promotional sale, shall be conducted by the management entity and shall be subject to separate review and approval of a Temporary Use Permit. 13) All activities shall be conducted inside the building. No display, sales, or food vendors shall be permitted outside the building, except as may be approved through a Temporary Use Permit. 14) The applicant shall submit a wastewater survey to the Cucamonga County Water District during the plan check process, prior to issuance of building permits, to determine pre-treatment requirements and any additional sewer development fees that may be required, 15) The applicant shall provide a separate water meter for the retail facility, as determined by the Cucamonga County Water District. Plans shall be submitted to the District for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. 16) Twelve months from the date of release of occupancy of the indoor wholesale/retail con~nercial use, the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to review the project to ensure conformante with these conditions, and that the health, safety, and welfare of the General Public has been maintained. At that time of review, the Planning Commission may impose additional conditions upon this application, including, but not limited to, the payment of fees for additional City services, as determined by the affected divisions, 17) The application shall be subject to all conditions of approval, as set forth by Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-03 and modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-06. 18) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 5 be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 19) Prior to occupancy all dead or dying vegetation shall be replaced with material of like kind and size subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. ATTE ST: -----" /~ra~, I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MEr.CHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMI S S IONERS: CHITIEA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 'A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03 TO ALLOW MORTGAGE BROKERS, REAL ESTATE SERVICES, TRAVEL BUREAUS, BEAUTY/NAIL SALONS, AND PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIOS WITHIN THE EXISTING CARNIVAL MALLS, LOCATED AT 11530 SIXTH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26 and March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial; and (c) The Industrial Area Specific Plan conditionally permits the proposed uses with Subarea 11; and (d) The proposed uses will be conducted within an enclosed, free-standing building that is predominantly leased to retailers. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1) All conditions identified in Resolution 91-80 shall be applied to this application. 2) All conditions identified in Resolution 86-78A shall be applied to this application. 3) The approval pertains to an expansion of the permitted uses to include the following uses: mortgage brokers, real estate services, travel agencies, beauty/nail salons, and photography studios only. 4) The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with the Cdndition of Approval regarding security to the satisfaction of the City Planner within thirty days from the date of this approval. 5) The applicant shall pay the necessary transportation development fees to the Building and Safety Division within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. The amount shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03 FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION TO INCLUDE INDEPENDENCE DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, THANKSGIVING DAY, AND CHRISTMAS DAY, WITHIN THE EXISTING CARNIVAL MALLS, LOCATED AT 11530 SIXTH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREEFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26 and March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Con~nission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1) All conditions identified in Resolution 91-80 shall be applied to this application. 2) All conditions identified in Resolution 86-78A shall be applied to this application. 3) The modification allows for an expansion of the hours of operation to include the following holidays: Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. 4) The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with the condition of approval regarding security to the satisfaction of the City Planner within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. 5) The applicant shall pay the necessary transportation development fees to the Building and Safety Division within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. The amount shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03 FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,- AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26 and March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. (c) Insufficient parking facilities exist for the proposed expansion of operation hours based upon a parking study submitted by the applicant which indicates a deficit of 85 parking stalls would exist on weekdays. (d) The applicant has failed to comply with conditions of approval in the issues of providing on-site security and proper business licensing of all vendors within the Carnival Malls site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-03 DENIAL - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows~ (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be d~trimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 05-24-199a 05:52PM FROM The Sc~ndl+'fio Cornp~r~ rO 1'r'14~'/~4~9 H.8~ THE SCANDIFFIO COMPANY March 24, 1992 Mr. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner Planning Division Community Development Department City of Rancho cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Subject~ Masi Project (CUP 91-24) - Specific Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Coleman: Please find attached some minor additions to t~ "C_oT,m. ercial Use Type" definitions as they appear in the staff~s draft resolution in regard to the Specific Plan Amendment for the above referenced project. We have suggested that the proposed new use categories, ae they appear in the ~raft resolution, be limited to areas in proximity to Foothill Activity Centers in Subarea 7. We also have added "home appliances" to the "Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvementse use category$ this item would include the sale of refrigerators, disposal units, washer/dryers and other household appliances. The word "professionals" was added to the "Business Support Services" uBe category to ensure that teachers, salespersons and other self-employed professionals can utillze these services. The above noted additions appear in bold type on the attached exllibit. Sincerely, Michael Scandiffio cc: Beverl~ Nissan commissioners McNiel, Melcher, Tolstoy, Chitlea, Vallette 03-24-1992 05:32PM FROM The Sc~.nctif~-xo ~ompan~ ~j lri4~Oro~,~_~ r-.~j Masi :Pro:::)ect (CI:~ 91-24) 31kI*PX, XGILIFf*8 ZIOYOBIID _,lkDDXTXOM8 ~ 8~ ~ ~OL~XOM · ~ditionm ~MZ ~ ~a~eCs ~ h ~ld Table ZZZ-2 Addition To: ~d Use ~e Definitions D. CO~CI~ easiness su~l~ Recai~ and , se~ices: ACtivities t~ically include, ~t ~e not i~it~ to: sa~es, rental or repair o~rtce ~tpment, ~ntshlngs, ~ supplies, excludln9 materials used in const~ction. Susiness su=nort seaices: Activities t~ically include, ~t ere ~ot' limited'~o: se~ices whi~ sup~ ~e a~ivity o~ businesses (and p=ofessionals), such as, cl~i~l, ~plo~ent, prote~ive, messen~er/~acsimile seaices, blueprint seaices and ~lti-copying. Activities not includ~ in ~is classification are / ~oks and settees of a personal ~t~e. phanacles and SDeclaltv Media1 [Real~ Stores: Activities t~tcally include, but ~e not limited to: sale of prescri~tion and "over-~e-co~teru d~gs, heal~ ~ diet products, a~ incidental sales of beauty suppiles. Uses excluded fr~ category are eneral m~andise s~g stores~. designted Foothill activity C~ters within ~~ ~-} ~dica! and Hospital Supply: A~iVitteS ~ically include, but are no~ limited to= sale ~d rental oT medical/hospital e~t~ent, supplies, ~d proe~etic devices. Farserial Settees= Activities ~t~ally include, bu~ are not limited to: infonation, instruction ~d s~ilar services o[ a personal nat~e; such as, computer ~a~i~, ~ivlng schools, day c~e facilities, travel b~eaus, and a~/mustc/dance/martial ar~s/pho~aphic studios. Specialty Buildlad S~Di~eS and B~e ~murov~6ts: Activities ~tcally include: bu~ 'are not limit~ t6= retail and wholesale sales and installation o'f ~cialty items, such as paint, wall/floor/window coverings, d~rs and wlnd~, ~ildlng materials, hardware, plumbing and electr~l sullies, ~ and kitchen fi~es and supplies, 11~htlng, swiulng pools and supplies, garden furnishings, materials ~d supplies and {~e appl~anoes}. Activities. shall be conducted in enclosed ~ildtngs of 25,000 s~are feet or less. Uses excluded fr~ this category are general merchandise stores. {Sueh eettvtt~es s~11 ~ lhtt~ to areas lo~t~ In prox~ity of des~gubed Foothill a~ttv~ty Centers wtthln S~r~ TOTAL P.03 0~-24-1992 i~:~PM FROM The Scandi~io Co~pan~ TO 171~987G~99 P.O1 03-24-1992 12:23PN FRON The Scandi~o CompBn~ TO 17149S76499 P,02 THE SCANDIFFIO COMPANY March 24, 1992 commissioner McNiel, Chairman Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Chitiea commissioner vallette Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Subject: SDecific P~an__Amendment~ Masi..pr~ject {CUP 91-24) Dear Commissioners: In our appllcation for a Specific Plan change to Subarea 7, we requested that certain permitted and conditionally permitted wholesale/service use categories be clari[ied and that some additional use categories, of a limited service/consumer sales character, be added. Central to our application was our request to limit these requested use categories to areas located in the proximity of Foothill Activity Centers. We went so far as to propose boundaries in which those proposed conditionally permitted uses may occur (see map attached). This concept, we believe, is quite important to the proper interpretation and evaluation of our application. We did not propose that the entirety of Subarea 7 be changed to accommodate all of our proposed conditionally permitted uses; in fact, we believe that it is quite undesirable to do so. The staff has prepared a draft resolution that clarifies and slightly expands in Subarea 7 two permitted categories, namely Business Supply Retail & Services and Business Support Services, and one conditionally permitted category, Personal Services. These modifications would apply to the entirety of Subarea 7. We support adoption of these. The draft resolution contains new, conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 - specifically Medical/Hospital Supply, Pharmacies & Specialty Medical/Health Stores and Specialty Building Supplies & Home Improvements. The draft resolution for these, if adopted, would permit these uses in the entirety of Subarea 7. We support these new uses but believe, as stated in our application, that these uses be confined to areas in proximity to Foothill Activity Centers. 03-24-1992 12:24PM FROM The Scandi~io Company TO 17149876499 P.03 Plan. Commission/Scandiffio - Masi Project (CUP 91-24) - 3/24/92 Page 2 We understand and agree with ~he CommtsSion"s concerns about the introduction of general retail uses throughout Subarea 7. Our application only endeavors to propose that certain limited service/consumer sales uses be considered on a conditionally approved basis in areas in proximity to Foothill Activity Centers (or possibly just the Activity Centers at Rochester Avenue). These use Categories are primarily Sporting Equipment & Supplies, Art/Music/Photo Supplies, Furniture &Appliances and Auto Supplies. We believe that the new Sports Center and the location of the Foothill/Rochester Activity Center at the Northeastern edge of Subarea 7 nearly adjacent to co_..mm___ercially zoned land supports our request. i hope this clarifies the specific requests of our application. we wilt be providing staff with an amended draft resolution that reflects some of the above points. Sincerely, _ Michael Scandiffio Dan Coleman Beverly Nissan 03-24-1992 12:24PM FROM The Scandi~io Company TO 191498?6499 P.04 SUB AREA 7 - PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage & Distribution · , Retail Sales with Conditional Use Permit Administrative & Office Professional/Design Services Research Services Building Maintenance Services Business Supply & Retail Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating & Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Hotel/Motel Administrative Civic Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES Automotive Rental/Leasing Automotive Sales Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales & getvices Entertainment Fast Food Ss/es Food & Beverage Sales Medical/Health Care Service Personal Services Recreational Facilities Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services Religious Assembly Research Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: research, design, analysis and development, and/or testing of a product; activities typically include, but are not limited to: testing laboratories, acoustical chambers, wind tunnels, and main frame computer services. Such uses do not promote odors, noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on the same site. C. WHOLESALE, STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION USE TYPES Public Storage: Activities include mini-warehouse or recreation vehicle storage facilities for the rental or 1 ease of smal 1 scale enclosed storage units or parking spaces primarily to individuals rather than firms or organizations. Activities to store household items other than storage operations-are not allowed on the premises. Where 24 hour on-site surveillance is necessary a caretaker' s residence may be permitted when approved by a Condi ti onal Use Permit. Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: whol esal i ng, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approveS' ~s ~ Conditional Use. Where 24 | hours on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker s residence may be permitted when approved by a Condi ti onal Use Permit. Medium Wholesale, Storage and Distribution: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: wholesale, storage and warehousing services, moving and storage services, storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of fi ni shed goods and food products, and' distribution facilities for large scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and-occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi- tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. Where 24 ours on-si te surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. III-lO 03/~,'92 16:09 ~714 467 9535 BISHOP HAWK Ln the Shopping Center shall be used for any entertainment purpOseS such as a cinema, theater, skating rifik, bowling alley, club, massage parlor, or off-crack bet=~ g Y, ':'~'!!! ' i]:f '(D)Dandlord agrees ~hacso long as the Demised lectrical 8~ liesr paint, wallpaper, s~d~ g, , ndlor an I P b n La not be binding upon the Shopping Center, such grants shall Demised Premises and Landlord shall expressly exempt the premises from such res:ric~ions'= i~ ~ ~ 5. (A) Tenant and all persons having business with Tenant shall have the right to use, in common with all o~her occupants of the Shopping Center and all persons having business with ~uch o~her occupants, without.charge, all common Areas and ' Common Facilities of the Shopping Center, for parking and access in connection with business in the Shopping Cen~er and for no o~her purposes. Tenant shall have the right to use, from time ~ime, without aymen= of additional rent, taxes or other amounts sales (including, without limitation, sales from a food cart located on the sidewalk immediately adjacent to and in front ~to Landlord, ~ · sidewalks adjacent to ~he Demised Premises for the Building), marketing, special promotion and customer service purposes, and to use portions of ~he Service Area behind and adjacent to the Demised premises for the staging of inventory- Tenant shall keep such sidewalks and staging area reasonably clean and neat while so used and upon completion of each such use. Tenant shall also have ~he right, without payment of additional rent, names or other amounts to Landlord, to use than area marked on the Lease Plan as =he "Tree Area" for ~he short- term seasonal sale of Christmas trees. (B) Unless Tenant shall approve in w=i:inG, no land adjacent to %he Shopping Cen=er.~ha!l be integrated with the Shopping Center and ~ha~ no paysons shall have any rights in zhe COmmon Areas of the Shopping Center other than occupants of the Shopping Center and persons having business wi~h such occupants. Without limitation, it shall non be unreasonable for Tenan~ withhold its approval if: {i) Tenant's obligations under B or Article VI shall be'increased, paragraph 8 of this Schedule ~his (iS) ~he parking ratio established in Paragraph 2 of Schedule B shall be reduced, (iii) any structures to be built on. said integrated lan~ shall exceed eighteen (18) feet in height, (iv) the proposed use o~ said integrated land shall conflict with Tenan='s use, or (v) Landlord shall fail to obtain a Reciprocal Masi Project (CUP 91-24) APPLICANT'8 PROPOSED ADDITION8 TO STAFF DRAFT RESOLUTION · Additions Appear in Brackets and in Bold Type Table III-2 Addition To: Land Use Type Definitions D. COMMERCIAL USE TYPES Business Supply Retail and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sales, rental or repair of office equipment, furnishings, and supplies, excluding materials used in construction. Business Support Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: services which support the activity of businesses {and professionals}, such as, clerical, employment, protective, messenger/facsimile services, blueprint services and multi-copying. Activities not included in this classification are the printing of books and services of a personal nature. Pharmacies and Specialty Medical/Health Stores: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sale of prescription and -over-the-counter" drugs, health and diet products, and incidental sales of beauty supplies. Uses excluded from this caSegory are general merchandise "drug stores". {Such activities shall be limited to areas located in proximity of designated Foothill Activity Centers within Subarea 7.} Medical and Hospital SUDD1V: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sale and rental of medical/hospital equipment, supplies, and prosthetic devices. {Such activities shall be limited to areas located in proximity of designated Foothill Activity Centers within Subarea 7.} Personal Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: information, instruction and similar services of a personal nature; such as, computer training, driving schools, day care facilities, travel bureaus, and art/music/dance/martial arts/photographic studios. Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint, wall/floor/window coverings, doors and windows, building materials, hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies, bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, swimming pools and supplies, garden furnishings, materials and supplies and {home appllances}. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet or less. Uses excluded from this category are general merchandise stores. {Such activities shall be limited to areas located in proximity of designated Foothill Activity Centers within Subarea 7.} PO BOX 7198 SVL RICHARD DAHL PHONE: (619) 243-5013 ENTERPRISES March 21, 1992 Mr. Larry McNiel, Chairman Member of the Planning Commission By way of this note I wish to clarify two areas regarding use for the Masi property in Sub area 7. First, in reference to Sub area 7 I wish to ~oint out that I was envolved with the creation and the following ammend- ments as a member of the Planning Commissioh and the City Council. I bring this up only to point. out the intent of the Council at that time which was to fine tune, beautify and create versatility of use for future developement. The intent was not to create the entire Sub area 7 into offices and light industrial boxes. Second, as many of you know I was the owner operator of A.C.E. Office Supply for five years, therefore, I speak with experience. Only, approximatley, 30% to 40% of the sales are done over-the,counter to individuals that have in home offices. 60% to 70% of the sales are with major outside accounts with deliveries and discounts up to thirty percent, which is near wholesale. Without these major accounts an office supply company could not survive. I hope this letter is a help in your determination of uses for the Masi property. Richard Dahl, Consultant cc: Planning Staff Michael Scandiffio CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02 - JACK MASI B. A request to add an auto court use, cons isting of automotive services and related activities, as a conditionally permitted use to Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan- C. A request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include certain retail and service-related activities- Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from March 11, 1992. ) BACkgROUND: Hearings on this three-part amendment were held by the Planning Commission on March 11, 1992. Part A, dealing with circulation, was approved; hearings on Part B and C were continued to this meeting. Attached to this report are draft Resolutions of approval for Parts B and C, dealing with the Automotive Service Court use and retail-related uses, respectively. These draft Resolutions are based on the Commission's discussion to date and incorporate only those elements on which there was an apparent consensus- Following the upcoming hearing on these items, the Resolutions may be modified as appropriate. PART B: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURTS There was a clear direction on this item, and the attached Resolution of Approval incorporates the following key points based on the Commission's discussion: o Conditional Use Permit required o 4-acre maximum o must include a gas/service station o 300-foot maximum of arterial frontage o no direct access off major arterials o requirements for screening, landscaping, berming, low retaining walls, or other treatment around the perimeter o operational requirements (storage, signage, etc-) Also please note, that service bays would no longer be required to be oriented to the rear- IT~4 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 25, 1992 Page 2 PART C: RETAIL AND RELATED LAND USES The Commission was receptive to some of the proposed uses, but expressed serious reservations about those retail activities which focus on general retailing. Again, the attached draft Resolution is based on apparent consensus- However, additional direction may be needed to resolve the remaining questions. The items discussed were: Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements: There was no clear consensus on this use- If the Commission considers this to be appropriate with a Conditional Use Permit, a 25,000 square foot limitation should be required. The draft Resolution includes this as a conditional use. Medical and Hospital Supply: There was consensus that this may be an appropriate use, again with a Conditional Use Permit. The Resolution includes this as a conditional use. However, staff does not feel a Conditional Use Permit is necessary for this use- It may be permitted by right with no adverse effects. Medical/Dru~ Superstores: There was a concern that the term ."drug superstores" as requested implies stores which focus on general merchandise rather than pharmacies and other specialty medical stores. To avoid confusion, the draft Resolution contains a new category, "Pharmacies and Specialty Medical/Health Stores" as a conditional use. Office Supplies, Furnishings, and Service: Existing codes already permit "Business Supply Retail and Services." Staff has revised the existing definition to include, specifically, "sales, rental or repair of office equipment, furnishings and supplies" as a permitted use- Pet Stores, Pet Care, and Recreational Supplies and Services: The Commission expressed strong reservations abut the retail activities in this category; the retail uses are therefore not included in the Resolution- However, staff has expanded the definition of "Personal Services," already permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, to include the applicant's request for art, music, and photographic studios. Home Furnishings and Appliances: Again, based on the Commission's reservation with the retail nature of this category, this is not included in the Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 25, 1992 Page 3 Auto Supplies: The Commission indicated this is not an appropriate use, except within the Automotive Court. Therefore, the use is not included in the draft Resolution- For additional information and staff analysis of the proposed uses, please consult Staff Report of March 11, 1992, attached. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, discuss the remaining issues, and take action on the suggested Resolutions- A recommendation for issuance of a Negative Declaration would also be appropriate- BB:BN:OK/mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report dated March 11, 1992 Resolution Recommending Approval for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-02, Part B Resolution Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No- 92-02, Part C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ::~ ....... STAFF REPORT ",' DATE: March 11, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ~ FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02 - JACK MASI A. A request to modify the local circulation pattern within Subarea 7, along Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and the Sports Park, to accommodate a proposed industrial development at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011- 10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. B. A request to add an auto court use, consisting of automotive services and related activities, as a conditionally permitted use to Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. C. A request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include certain retail and service-related activities. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ABSTRACT: This application involves a three-part amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP). Part A is a proposal for a change in the local circulation, Part B is a request for an "Auto Court" use, and Part C is a request to allow certain retail activities in portions of Subarea 7. The amendments are related to a 27-acre development project (Conditional Use Permit 91-24), proposed for the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Approval of all three parts of this amendment is required if the project is to be approved as currently proposed. Staff supports the approval of Parts A and B of this application, with minor modifications, as this is consistent with the intent of the ISP. However, Part C, the addition of retail activities into this area, is a matter of policy requiring specific direction by the Planning Commission. Staff could support some, but not all, of the additional retail uses as currently proposed. This report reviews each of the three requests in separate sections--A, B, and C--with separate Resolutions of Approval available for Items A and B. Staff intends to prepare a resolution for Part C as directed by the Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 2 A. CIRCULATION: Request to Modify the Local Circulation Element Within Subarea 7 Along Rochester Avenue. The applicant has requested access locations along Rochester Avenue which conflict with the access points designated in the ISP, shown as arrows south of Foothill Boulevard on Figure IV-9 of the ISP (Exhibit "A"). The designated access point locations along Rochester Avenue were based on the Engineering Division's Street Design Policy, which specifies 660-foot intersection spacing on Secondary Arterials. This coincides with property line spacing on the east side of Rochester Avenue and promotes the development of a local industrial street network with dedication shared equitably among the affected property owners (Exhibit "B"). Normally, under the Engineering Division's Driveway Policy, intermediate access would be allowed at 300-foot intervals. As the applicant has pointed out, the right turn lane for the first driveway south of Foothill Boulevard must be lengthened to accommodate a bus bay. This will force several subsequent driveways to be shifted southerly as well, off property lines. Shifting the access points would allow the parcels on the east side to develop independently with one driveway each. The two northernmost large parcels have the same owner which could result in a single development on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with access being more or less a "mirror image" of the applicant's proposed project (CUP 91-24) on the southwest corner (Exhibit "C"). Engineering staff feels the proposed access point locations are equivalent to those currently shown in the ISP and thus does not object to the applicant's request. We recommend that the ISP's Circulation Element be amended by eliminating the arrows on Figure IV-9 (Exhibit "A") which allows the flexibility of the applicant's request as well as other options if the applicant's plan does not proceed. B. "AUTO COU~T" LAND USE: Request to Add an "Auto Court Use" as a Conditionally Permitted Use in Subarea 7. 1. Backqround: The applicant is requesting the addition of an "Auto Court" category as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 7. The applicant has requested that the "Auto Court" be specifically defined as follows: a. The "Auto Court" must be anchored by a gas or service station. b. Maximum Size: 4 acres. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 3 c. Cannot extend or "front" along a major or secondary arterial more than 300 feet. d. No access permitted directly off major arterial. e. Garage doors and service areas must be screened from all major and secondary arterials. f. Permitted Uses: Gas stations; service stations~ automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks, aligrunents, brakes, oil change, lubrications, tune-ups, smog checks, tire repair and replacement, transmissions, and general auto repairs installation of air conditioning, car phones, stereos, windshields and upholstery; and windshield tinting and other related services. Also general sale of auto parts. g. Gas or service stations may have ancillary car washes and food marts. h. "Auto Courts" are not permitted in "Activity Zones." (See the "Activity Zone" Concept section of this report.) The applicant contends that the need for a separate "Auto Court" category is the result of the current market trend towards the elimination of the traditional "service station" with auto repair capabilities. Traditional service stations are currently defined as follows in the ISP: Automotive Service Station: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the sale from the premises of goods and the provision of service normally required in the day-to-day operation of motor vehicles, including the principal sale of petroleum products, the incidental sale of tires, batteries, replacement items, and lubricating services, and the performance of minor repairs, such as tune-up, tire change, and brake work. (Note that this is a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 7.) The applicant has indicated that they feel these types of facilities are rarely built anymore and that the current trend is toward more specialized auto uses such as separate lube and tune, muffler, and tire shops. 2. Staff Comments: The uses which the applicant is proposing seem generally appropriate and compatible with the uses currently established within Subarea 7 (Industrial Park). In fact, the following proposed uses are already included in the definition of an Automotive Service Station: * General sale of auto parts. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 4 , Service and repair of brakes, oil change, lubrication, and tune-ups, and tire repair and replacements. The more intensive uses requested include repair of mufflers and shocks, wheel alignments, smog checks, and transmission repairs. These types of uses would typically fall in the category of Automotive and Light Truck Repair - Minor and Major. Neither of these uses are permitted within Subarea 7. The proposed uses, however, could be compatible with the inclusion of the added design guidelines that the applicant has proposed, such as screening of garage doors and service areas from major and secondary arterials and the prohibition of access from major arterials. Staff would also recommend that the buildings be sited so that service bays are oriented towards the rear of the building. The guiaelines proposed--(1) maximum 4-acre project size, (2) required service station anchor, and (3) a 300-foot limitation on frontage--would help to guard against proliferation of such facilities within Subarea 7. The Commission may also wish to consider requiring dense landscaping surrounding all sides of the project for screening. 3. Recommendation: The Planning Commission should allow the category of "Automotive Service Court" as a conditional use as defined in Section B1. However, Item h should be deleted since the "Activity Zone" concept is not recommended (see Part C, below). Also, the following design criteria should be added to the definition: a. Service bays should be oriented to the rear of all buildings. b. Dense landscaping should be provided around the perimeter of the project site for screening purposes. c. Outdoor storage of inoperative vehicles, parts, or equipment is prohibited. d. All work shall be conducted indoors. e. All signage shall be limited to signs approved under a Uniform Sign Program. C. RETAIL AND RELATED LAND USES: Request to Expand the List of Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses in Subarea 7. 1. Backqround: Subarea 7 of the ISP stretches along the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Day Creek to Deer Creek, a distance of approximately two miles. Although it is designated "Industrial Park" in the ISP, land use activities currently PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 5 permitted include not only traditional light manufacturing, but also a full range of office, administrative, business support, and other business and personal related services, including convenience retail, entertainment, and automotive services. A list of permitted and conditionally uses can be found in Exhibit "D." This very broad mix of uses is intentional. It was devised to provide a viable transition between the industrial and employment areas to the south and the residential/retail developments to the north. It also recognizes that Foothill Boulevard, as the major east-west artery connecting to the 1-15 Freeway, will eventually attract high volume services needed in the community but not appropriately located within either the industrial area to the south or the residential/retail areas to the north. At the same time, the current regulations stop short of allowing a full range of unrestricted retail activities in Subarea 7. The City ' s current land use plan for Foothill Boulevard recognizes that the community cannot support retail/commercial establishments along the entire 6-1/2 mile corridor without a negative impact on existing retail centers in the older part of the community or already planned commercial centers elsewhere. The intention is to strike a balance; ideally, an ample amount of commercial zoning should be available to accommodate needed retail services without creating such an overabundance of commercially zoned land that it cannot be developed to its potential, resulting in marginal or temporary land uses. 2. Applicant's request: Given this background, it should be noted that the applicant is NOT requesting a zone change or a General Plan amendment.. Rather, the request is to expand the range of permitted and conditionally permitted uses to include certain retail activities. This was done in an effort to be consistent with the intent of the ISP. The applicant ' s request and justification is detailed in Exhibit "E," attached. The specific uses requested, their definitions, and staff comments are summarized below: a. Specialty Buildinq Supplies & Home Improvements. This would include stores specializing in the sale and possibly installation of paint, wallpaper, floor coverings, draperies and curtains, doors and windows, building materials, .hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies, bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, swimming pools and supplies, and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 6 Many of these users would sell to the trade (at wholesale prices) as well as to the general public. It should be emphasized that these are specialty businesses, not general merchandise stores like Builder's Emporium or Home Depot. Staff Comments: There are no similar uses to this currently found within the ISP other than those indicated in Development Agreement 87-01 (Foothill Commercial Design Center) on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues. The intent of this Development Agreement, however, was to limit the uses to sales only to designers, interior decorators, builders, etc., and not to the general public. This application would permit retail sales to the general public as well. As indicated previously, "Light Wholesale, Storage & Distribution" is permitted in Subarea 7. Related retail uses are permitted in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit. The reasoning could be made that the applicant's request is merely an extension of the broader definition of "Light Wholesale, Storage & Distribution." The Commission should also take into consideration whether or not they feel there is adequate land in the City zoned for such uses without adding additional retail uses that would create an imbalance. Staff would recommend that a size limitation of 25,000 square feet be placed on this use category. Recommendation: This use should be defined as the applicant has requested. The 25,000 square foot size limitation should be added to the definition. The use should be limited to buildings or projects adjacent to Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers (on Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue). b. Office Supplies, Furnishinqs and Servicec This would include blueprint and photocopy services, office supplies and furnishings, messenger/wire services, business machines and computer equipment and supplies, and postal/mail receiving and packaging. Staff Comments: The uses as proposed are very similar to those in the category of "Business Supply Retail and Services" and "Business Support Services" both of which are permitted uses within Subarea 7. This type of use would be quite compatible with the intent of Subarea 7. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 7 Recommendation: This use, as defined, is compatible with other uses in Subarea 7 and may be added as a permitted use. c. Auto Supplies: This would be limited to parts sales only--no services, repair, or installation. Staff Comments and Recommendation: This is a strictly retail use and would not be appropriate throughout the entirety of Subarea 7. It may be appropriate only in conjunction with the "Auto Court" concept which has been discussed elsewhere in this report. d. Medical & Hospital Supply Stores and Medical/Druq Superstores: This would include the sale and rental of medical and hospital equipment and supplies and large medical/drug stores. Staff Comments: This type of use is not noted in the ISP but could be compatible with the intent of the Industrial Park designation which is identified in the ISP as a transitional category from industrial to residential uses. The use proposed is also compatible with "Medical/Health Care Services" which is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7, provided the use is truly a specialty medical store as opposed to a "drug store" with general merchandising and a relatively small drug counter. Recommendation: This use could be added with a . Conditional Use Permit and should have a 25,000 square foot or less size limitation added to the definition. In addition, the definition should be revised to permit only stores with a primary focus on medical-related sales. e. Pet Stores, Pet Care and Recreational Supplies and Services: This would include pet supplies; pet stores; riding tack and supplies~ riding and western wear; sporting goods and athletic supplies; sports memorabilia; veterinary clinics; art galleries~ photo labs; and music, art, and photo studios and supplies. Staff Comment: This category, as proposed, is much too broad and should be natrowed down somewhat. Art galleries; photo laboratories; and music, art, and photo PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 8 studios and supplies are not at all related to pet stores. Note, however, that photo studios are already included in the definition for "Personal Services" which is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7. Art and music studios could easily be incorporated into the definition for "Personal Services" and would be compatible. Recommendation: Art and music studios should be added to the definition of "Personal Services." Staff is seeking Commission direction on these land uses. 3. "Activity Zone" Concept: In response to staff concerns that the entire Subarea 7 would become a potential commercial zone if the proposed uses were to be added to current regulations, the applicant is proposing that these new uses be restricted to only small portions of Subarea 7. As proposed by the applicant, the new retail uses would be permitted only within "Foothill Activity Zones." (These are defined by the appli6ant in Exhibit "E.") The applicant is also requesting that the "service retail" uses proposed be classified as permitted uses within an "activity zone" which would be approved under a master Conditional Use Permit. Staff Comments: Staff concurs that new retail activities, if permitted, should be limited to specified locations. However, rather than introducing the new concept of an "activity zone," we suggest that the new uses be simply restricted to the immediate vicinity of the already established "activity centers" as defined by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. Limiting the uses to the already established "Activity Centers" would be a workable means of assuring that such uses would not dominate Subarea 7. The "Activity Zone" concept would not be easily incorporated into the existing format of the ISP. In addition, an "Activity Zone" could easily be confused with the "activity center" concept already in place within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The key points the applicant is proposing regarding the "Activity Zone" could, however, be easily incorporated into the definition section of the ISP and/or into the definitions of the new proposed uses. Recommendation: Staff feels this section should be deleted since the "activity zone" concept does not seem workable. Instead, staff recommends that revised land use definitions and criteria for the location of proposed conditionally permitted uses be utilized. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 92-02 - JACK MASI March 11, 1992 Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Upon review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part II, the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to an ISP Amendment which 1) modifies the local circulation pattern within Subarea 7 along Rochester Avenue; 2) adds an "Auto Court" use consisting of automotive services and related activities as a conditionally permitted use to Subarea 7; and 3) expands the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 to include certain retail and service-related activities. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as a public hearing, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of ISP Amendment 92-02, Parts A and B to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration. A Resolution of Approval for Part C, based on specific direction by the Commission, will be prepared and brought back for Commission action at a future meeting. nner BB:BN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - ISP Figure IV-9 Exhibit "B" - Current Access Spacing Exhibit "C" - Proposed Access Spacing Exhibit "D" - Permitted and Conditional Uses in Subarea 7 Exhibit "E" - Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval ISPA 92-02, Part A Resolution of Approval ISPA 92-02, Part B , ! PLANMNG-DMSION SUBAREA 7 Land Use Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City' s I ndustri al Area and community oriented non-industrial area and is a gateway to the City. A major industrial, office, and commercial development on approximately 300 acres is currently undergoing phased construction. Within this area is a planned Civic Center which will include San Bernardino County and City offices. Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing Light 14anufacturi ng Administrative and Office Professional/Desi gn Services Research Services Light Wholesale, Storage, Distribution .. Bull ding Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communi cati on Services Eating and Drinking Estal~lishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel/Motel Administrative Civic Services F1 boa Control/Uti 1 i ty Corri dot Condi ti onal Uses Automarl ve Rental /Leasing Automotive Sales Automatt ve Service Stati ol). Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales Medical/Heal th Care Servtces Personal Services Recreati on Facil i ties Cul rural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Rel i gi bus Assembly IV-48 C January 22, 1992 Dan Coleman, Principal Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Subject: Summary of Requests Submitted for Planning Board Action Location: Masi Property, Southwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard & Rochester Avenue Reference: CUP 91-24 Dear Mr. Coleman: Please find below a summary of requests for Planning Board action for the above referenced project. Where applicable, a 'narrative is provided with the applicant's justification or argument in favor of the proposed Planning Commission action. A) Tentative Parcel Map A 32 parcel subdivision, including a public street, is proposed. The applicant is Masi Commerce Center Partners, a Limited Partnership of Masi family interests; Jack Masi is the sole General Partner of this Limited Partnership. Masi Commerce Center Partners is owner of the land comprising all the proposed parcels except the approximately 2.5 acre corner land at Foothill and Rochester, hereinafter referred to as the "corner property". The "corner property", comprised of proposed parcels #'s 5, 6 & 7, is owned by the Sebastian Masi Trust (Jack Masi is Trustee) and Jennie Masi (Jack Masi is empowered here to act on behalf of Jennie Masi). Masi Commerce Center Partners is pursuing approvals for both properties and is representing all concerned in this matter. The Masi family desires to create an integrated development of both land holdings. A total of 268,907 square feet of development is proposed. An alternate scheme, involving a minor site design change to the "corner property", would total 267,907 square feet; it is described in the next section below. The square footage of development and proposed uses are summarized in an accompanying exhibit in the submittal package. II II E XH I! l'r' / 1510 ~verside Drive · Bu~ank, CA 91506 (818) 846-2070 Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 2 B) Design Approval Design approval is requested for all buildings except restaurant parcel #5. We are working with a tenant for that building although the exact building size and design have not been clearly established at this time. Two schemes are presented for the "corner property". Scheme A has three buildings, a 10,000 s.f. restaurant (pad #5) and two service retail buildings (#6 & #7). In alternate scheme "B", building #7 has been eliminated so as to provide parking for a 14,000 s.f. restaurant for pad #5 rather than the 10,000 s.f. restaurant as shown in scheme "A". The design of building #6 remains the same however. We request the approval of both design alternatives for the "corner property". If scheme "B" is ultimately selected, we would combine proposed parcels #5 and #7 into a singie parcel. C) Conditional Use Permit In addition to the site plan approval as described above, conditional use permits will also be required for the following uses: 1) Automotive Service Station (Parcel 2) The gas station has two gas 'islands, an automated car wash and a small food mart; this is a typical Texaco station. The gas station building is approx. 1800 square feet. A conditional use permit may also be required for the sale of food and beverages from the ancillary food mart. It is envisioned that the station will be part of a larger Auto Court (see Specific Plan Amendment section below). 2) Fast Food Sales (Parcel 3) A Jack In The Box fast food establishment, approximately 2770 square feet, is proposed for parcel #3. 3) ReliGious Assembly. (Parcel 14) We propose to relocate Victory Chapel from the existing "winery" building on Foothill Boulevard to building 14. Building 14, approx. 8096 s.f, is a tilt-up industrial building with 24 parking stalls and a parking ratio of 2.96 cars per thousand square feet. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of requests - Masi Property Page 3 An area equal to 1950 square feet will be used as an assembly area; the balance of the space will be used for offices 2500 s.f.), the baptistery (500 s.f.), storage (1900 s.f.) and classrooms (1200 s.f.). The assembly area would not be used at the same time as the other spaces. The baptistery would not be used at the same time as the assembly area or the other spaces. We understand that 35 spaces are needed for each 1000 s.f. of assembly space. Thus 68 spaces are required. The offices require 10 spaces, the classrooms require 12 spaces and the storage area requires 2 spaces - for a total of 24 stalls. The baptistery is not like the assembly area and would not require as many parking spaces; nevertheless, it would not be used at the same time as the other spaces. It is clear that the planned 24 parking s~aces for building #14 can handle all uses except the assembly space. An additional 46 stalls are needed, consistent with the fact that the office, classroom, storage and baptistery spaces are not used at the same time as the assembly area. (68 required spaces for assembly less 24 provided on site equals 44 additional spaces needed). We propose that a reciprocal parking right be allowed with adjoining parcel #13; parcel #13 has 44 stalls. Religious assembly occurs on Sunday mornings and thus will not impact parcel #13, designated for service retail use. We think this is a good solution to the problem of church assembly parking requirements. 4) Conditional Use Permit for p~opOsed Auto Court Use and Service Retail Uses in ACtivity Zone see D(2) and D(3) below. D) Industrial Specific Plan Amendments 1) Remove or Relocate Desiqnated Access Point on Rochester Avenue. The Industrial Specific Plan, subarea 7, calls for access points on shared property lines approximately 610 feet South of Foothill Boulevard on Rochester Avenue. We believe that this designated access point no longer has any strong validity and would be better located if moved approximately 134 feet South on Rochester Avenue as shown on our proposed site plan. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 4 Sheet 41 of the submittal package is a master plan for the area surrounding the Masi site with the subject access points on Rochester Avenue moved to the proposed locations. The specific justifications for the movement of the access points are summarized below: a) City standards dictate that a bus bay with a right turn stacking lane must have a minimum length of 335 feet. We find this City standard appropriate and desirable. Since the Masi property is required to have a bus lane at the corner of Foothill and Rochester, the first driveway along Rochester must be located at least 335 feet from the corner of Foothill and Rochester; our first driveway is almost exactly at that minimum distance. This driveway location dictates the next. The designated driveway in the Specific Plan would fall within the minimum 300 foot required spacing between driveway centerlines, as per City standards. However, the proposed access point (moved approx. 135 feet to the South) is comfortably at a distance of approx 340 feet (centerline to centerline) from the upper driveway near the bus bay. For a site the size of the Masi property (approx. 27 acres), two driveways on Rochester are essential to handle the proposed intensity of development. The designated access point in the Specific Plan precludes the northerly proposed driveway probably because the Specific Plan did not anticipate the required bus bay which ultimately affects driveway locations. b) The elimination of Pioneer Boulevard via a Specific Plan amendment so as to facilitate the development of the Sports Center to the South of the Masi property also weakens the justification for the location of the subject access point. Pioneer Boulevard, once located 660 feet South of the subject designated access point, was intended to extend all the way to Miliken Avenue. With the elimination of this East/West thoroughfare, a significant load will likely be taken off Rochester Avenue. The proposed location of the subject access point approx. 135 feet further South is thus far less significant due to the elimination of Pioneer Boulevard. See sheet #41. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of requests - Masi Property Page 5 c) The proposed access points are superior in terms of the development of parcels on the East side of Rochester Avenue opposite the Masi property. As sheet #41 illustrates, lots 31 and 32 are owned by the same owner, Gwo-Chau Liao; combined they total about 12.4 acres. The Specific Plan access point would put this parcel's access road along its Southern property line. This clearly would be undesirable in terms of good site planning because the rear property line would most likely be the loading area for buildings in the back half of the site (see sheet #41). The facades of these buildings would be better oriented towards Foothill Boulevard with the main access drive running through the middle of the site as shown on sheet #41. Additionally, this property is too smakl for a public street and thus there is little logic for extending the proposed "Masi Drive" through it. The 7 acre Masi property to the South of the Gwo- Chau Liao property (lots 31 & 32) works very well with the location of the proposed "Masi Drive". This piece would best be developed as small, high- end industrial buildings.with a high parking ratio as proposed on the subject Masi property (see sheet #41). Like the Gwo-Chau Liao property, an access point on the Northern property line of this piece would run counter to good site planning. We envision this piece to have a private drive or cul de sac with adjoining industrial lots on either side of this access road, thus creating an environment suitable for a high-end, small industrial building project. Since we do not envision large industrial boxes on this site, an access road along its Northern boundary, as currently shown in the Industrial Specific Plan, would run counter to good site planning. In sum, changes in land uses along this section of Rochester Avenue (Sports Center), the elimination of Pioneer Boulevard, the pattern of property ownership and land development and other special requirements (bus bay and right turn lane stacking standards) seriously weaken the justification for the access points as specified in the Industrial Specific Plan. We believe our proposed access points better reflect present and future conditions. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 6 2) Auto Court Use Cateqory Added to Subarea 7 As Conditionally Permitted Use. The current trend in the marketplace is the elimination of service stations with auto repair capabilities. These are being replaced by "gas" stations, that is, no auto repair services are available. The "gas" stations usually have food marts and some also have automatic car washes. Auto repair is becoming highly specialized, as evidenced by "Lube and Tune", Smog Pro, Midas, Winston Tires and various other auto service specialists. The emphasis of these service specialists is on speed, convenience and price. We are proposing the Auto Court use category ~0 reflect these new realities. Traditional "service" stations are permitted conditionally in subarea 7, but not these new specialty services. We believe these new "fast and convenient" services would be quite appropriate if grouped together into a planned and aesthetically pleasing "Auto Court" anchored by a gas station. We are working with Texaco, Jiffy Lube, Midas Muffler, American Tire, Amco and Zeus Automotive in the planning. and design of our proposed Auto Court. We propose the addition of an "Auto Court" use classification to be added as a conditionally permitted use in subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan. Specifically, we propose the following: a) The Auto Court must be anchored by a gas or service station. b) Maximum Size: 4 acres. c) Can not extend or "front" along a major or secondary arterial more than 300 feet. d) No access permitted directly off major arterial. e) Garage doors and service areas must be screened from all major and secondary arterials. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 7 f) Permitted Uses: Gas stations, service stations, automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks, alignments, brakes, oil change, lubrications, tune-ups, smog checks, tire repair and replacement, transmissions, general auto repair, installation of air conditioning, car phones, stereos, windshields and upholstery, windshield tinting and other related services. Also general sale of auto parts. g) Gas or service stations may have ancillary car washes and food marts. h) Auto Courts are not permitted in "Activity Zones". See "activity zone" proposal under D(3) b. elow. We propose that the conditional use permit be granted for the entire Auto Court, rather than just for particular parcels or buildings. Permitted uses would become "as of right" once the conditional use permit for the auto court is granted. 3) "Foothill Activity Zone" with Service Retail Uses Added to Subarea 7 As Conditionaliv Permitted Use Category. We propose that a "Foothill Activity Zone" area be added to subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan. Within this zone we propose that certain service retail uses be allowed. The purpose of the activity zone would be to encourage pedestrian activity at certain key intersections along Foothill Boulevard and to provide a better transition between industrial areas and residential and neighborhood/community retail areas. The proposed permitted service retail uses are those that are often found within or at the edges of industrial areas and border on major thoroughfares. These service retail uses reflect the new trends in marketing where there is little or no distinction between discount sales to the public and wholesale trade. Many of these service retail businesses may involve retail or discount sale to the public as well as special wholesale prices for the "trades" or retailers. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 8 These service retail users are usually in the range of 5,000 s.f. to 25,000 s.f. Because of their discount nature, they can not afford to pay mall prices. They are usually not considered "anchors" because they are not large enough and due not have the attraction of a typical anchor like a supermarket or a Marshalis. Therefore, they due not get the bargain rents that typical anchors get in neighborhood and community centers. Since they are discount in nature, they must seek cheaper rents and can not afford to pay the rents paid by smaller "mom and pop" stores. For this reason such uses tend to locate in transitional zones between industrial and neighborhood/community retail and residential areas. ~. The typical discount center, such as Victoria Market and the Foothill Marketplace, put the emphasize on getting larger users, 100,000 s.f. and larger to anchor their centers; the "mom and pop" stores pay high rent and the anchors pay very little; the profits are made on the "mom and pop" stores. However, the 5,000 to 25,000 s.f. service retail user is often left out; often there is little space available for these mid-size users and, if space is available, the rent is too high (the anchors must be subsidized). For example, Victoria Courtyard will have a 122,000 s.f. Home Depot and a 113,000 s.f. K-Mart. Except for one 20,000 s.f. building, all the other buildings are geared towards smaller shops under 5,000 s.f. Clearly one can see that these mid-size service retail users (5,000 to 25,000 s.f.) are not adequately provided for in these large discount centers. We believe the Masi property provides an excellent location for these destination type, mid-size service retail users. The "regional" nature of many of these service retail uses will reinforce the planned Victoria Gardens shopping mall nearby. They will also be quite compatible with the adjacent Sports Center and will provide an excellent transition between the industrial zone and the nearby regional/community retail, hotel and residential areas. Coleman/Scandiffio - Sununary of Requests - Masi Property Page 9 It should be noted that "wholesale to retailers of finished goods and food products" is already permitted in subarea 7; in fact, "retail sales from the premises may occur when approved as a conditional use". (See section III, part (C) on page III-10 of the Industrial Specific Plan.) Our proposal can be viewed as an extension of this concept so as to accommodate new marketing trends that were not clearly established at the time the Industrial Specific Plan was first written. Specifically, we propose the following definition of an "activity zone": a) Activity Zone Defined 1) An activity zone must abut Foothill Boulevard and must be in subarea 7; it can not occur within the Haven Avenue Overlay District.. 2) An activity zone must occur at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard with a major or secondary arterial. 3) The maximum frontage of the activity zone along Foothill Boulevard is limited to 1000 feet. The maximum depth of an activity zone from the centerline of Foothill Boulevard is 700 feet. 4) -The maximum amount of service retail uses (excluding eating establishments) allowed in an activity zone is limited to 110,000 square feet. 5) the maximum size of any retail user is limited to 50,000 square feet. (This is consistent with the current 50,000 s.f. size limit for light wholesale users allowed in subarea 7.) 6) Permitted and conditionally permitted uses in subarea 7 are still permitted within activity zones; however, service stations and "Auto Courts" (see D(2) above) are not allowed in activity zones. We propose that the "activity zone" designation be given as a conditional use and that the permitted service retail uses become "as of right" within the conditionally permitted "activity zone". . Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 10 We propose the following service retail uses to be allowed within the "Foothill Activity Zone": 1) Specialty Building Supplies & Home Improvements This would include stores specializing in the sale, and possibly installation, of paint, wallpaper, floor coverings, draperies and curtains, doors and windows, building materials, hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies, bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, swimming pools and supplies and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Many of these users would sell to the trade (at contractor prices) as well as to the general public. It should be emphasized that these are specialty businesses, not general merchandise stores like Builder's Emporium or Home Depot. We are working with Dunn Edwards Paints (10,000 s.f.), Wallpaper To Go (5,000 s.f.) and Color Tile (5,000 s.f.). 2) Office Supplies, Furnishings and Service This would include blueprint and photocopy services, office supplies and furnishings, messenger/wire services, business machines and computer equipment and supplies and postal/mail receiving and packaging. We are working with Bismarck Inc., a 25,000 to 30,000 s.f. computer and office supply superstore, seriously looking to enter the Southern California market. 3) Auto Supplies This would be limited to parts sales only - no service, repair or installation. This compliments the Auto Court use category. We plan to have Chief Auto Parts. in Building #4. Coleman/Scandiffio - Summary of Requests - Masi Property Page 11 4) Medical & Hospital Supply Stores and Medical/ Drug Superstores This would include the sale and rental of medical and hospital equipment and supplies and large medical/drug stores. We believe this is an excellent service retail use category for the Masi property given the close location of the new North San Antonio Medical Center. We are currently working with Drug Emporium (25,000 s.f.). 5) Pet Stores, Pet Care and Recreational'Supplies and Services This would include pet supplies, pet stores, riding tack and supplies, riding and western wear, sporting goods and athletic supplies, sports memorabilia, veterinary clinics, art galleries, photo labs, and music, art and photo studios and supplies. We believe this use category is quite compatible with the adjacent Sports Center. We are working with Elliot's Pet Emporium (30,000 s.f.), a pet supply superstore. I hope the above Snmmary of Requests addresses all the relevant areas concerning our application. Please call me if you have any questions, need any clarification or require more information. Sincerely, Mic~l Scandiffio Owner ' s Representative RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-02, PART B, TO ADD AN "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT" USE CONSISTING OF AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Jack Masi has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 92-02, Part B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the llth day of March 1992 and the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on March 25, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11, and March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to properties located within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (b) The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part II. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 92-02B2 - JACK MASI March 25, 1992 Page 2 (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) The proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (e) The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the proposed amendment has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs. 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-02, Part B, amending Table III-1, page IV-48, and Table III-2, as attached. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TABLE II!-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA · PERMITTED USE ,I, CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES I Land Use= Subareas MANUFACTURING Custom Light Heavy OFFICE PROFESSIO DESIGN & RESEARCH Administrative & Office Professional/Design Services WNOLESAL;_a STORAGE & ION Public Stoeage. Light Medium Heavy COMMERCIAL Agricdtwal/NurserY Supplies & Service Animal Care A.tomotive Fleet Storage kotomotive Rental/Leasing Automotive/Ught Tack R~ Automotive / Truck Repair-Major Automotive Bales Automotive Service Court Automotive Service Station Building CenttactiCs Office & Yards Building Contractor's Storage Yard Balding Maintenance Services Building & LJgMing Equipment Supplies & Business I4eINY Retell & Serv~e8 Business Support Services Cofmmaecstion Sewtees Convenience Sales & Services EaUng&DdnklngBmabbaheets Entertainment Extensive impact Ceasesled Felt Food Sales FInancial, lieufence · Red Estate Sendee Food · Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales · RentaM Hotel/Motel Laundry Services Personal Services RecreaUonai Facilities Scrap Opereti;; CIVIC Administrative Cultural Extensive NeDact Utility Facilities Flood Control/Utility Corridor ~ Ammbly Public Safety & Utility Services · IP-lndustrt81 Park Ca-General industrial MI/~,|;Minimum Impact Heavy industrial He-Haven Ave. Overlay District Hl-+ieevY industrial ZZT-5 ~') ~2~. Revised: 1/20/88 - 8/15/90 3 '06 'Q 1 SUBAREA 7 Land Use Des1 gnat1 on % ndustrt al Park Prtmary Function' Subarea 7 occupies an area cHrect]y south of Foothill Boulevard vffi~ch represents an Important ]and use edge between the Ct ty' s I ndustr. t a~ Area and con~uni ty oftented non-industrial area and is a gateway to the C~ty. A major industrial, office, and com~rcta] development on approximately 300 acres ts currently undergo1 ng phased construct1 on. llt thtn thi s area i s a planned Ctvic Center which wil] tnC~ude San Bernardtno County and Ctty offices. Pemt tted Uses Custom Nanufactur1 ng L1 ght !~8nufactur~ ng Admt nt stratt ve and Off1 ce Profess~ dnal/Des1 gn Serv~ ces Research Servtces L ~ ght ~lhol esal e, Stora ge, 0t strt but~ on Su~ 1 d~ ng !~ai ntenance Servtces Bust ness Supply Retat 1 Sales and Serv~ ces Bust hess Support Serv~ ces Co~m~nt cart on Servtces Eattng and Drtnktng Establishments Ftnandal, ~nsurance and Real Estate Servtces H ore1 / t4otel Admt nt stratt ve Ct vt c $ervtces F1 ood Control/Ut~ 1 tty Corrt dot Condt tt onal Uses Automot1 ve Rental/Least ng ' Automot1 ve Sales Automot1 ve Serv~ ce Start on Convenience Sales and Serv(ces E ntertat nine nt Fast Food Sales Food and BevePage Sales Iqedt ca1/Heal th Care Servtces Personal Servlces Recreatt on Fact1 ttt es Cul tufa1 Pub1 tc Assembly Pub1 ~ c Safety and Utt 1 ~ ty Servt ces ,; Re1 t gt ous AssemBly / ~.ut, omotj. ve se~v~.ce couzrt, TABLE III-2 ADDITION TO: LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT: An integrated cluster of related automotive service activities, which typically include: gas stations; service stations; automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks, alignments, brakes, oil change, lubrications, tune-ups, smog checks, tire repair and replacement, and transmissions; general auto repair; installation of air conditioning, car phones, stereos, windshields and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale of auto parts; and other related services. Auto Courts shall comply with the following design criteria: - Maximum Size: 4 acres. - Must be anchored by a gas or service station. - Maximum frontage along a major or secondary arterial street: 300 feet- - No access to the site will be permitted directly off any major arterial. - Service bays and pump islands shall be screened from all major and secondary arterials through a combination of berms, landscaping, low walls, and building orientation- - An appropriate combination of berms, landscaping, and architectural elements shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the site to minimize the impact of the auto court uses from the existing and future surrounding uses- - Outdoor storage of inoperative vehicles, parts, or equipment is prohibited- - All work shall be conducted indoors. - All signage shall be limited to signs approved under a Uniform Sign program- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-02, PART C, EXPANDING THE LIST OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES IN SUBAREA 7, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Jack Masi has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-02, Part C, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On March 11, 1992 and March 25, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on March 25, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11, and March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to properties located within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (b) The proposed amendments will not have a s~gnificant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part II. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 92-02C2 - JACK MASI March 25, 1992 Page 2 (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located~ and (c) The proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan~ and (d) The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity~ and (e) The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-02, Part C, amending Table III-1, page IV-48, and Table III-2, as attached. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMI S S IONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TABLE IIi-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA · PERMITTED USE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES I Lend Uee· IP GI GI;GI GI iGI IP IP GI el~f GI ' GI IP GI; GI HI iIP IP Subareas HO 1 2 3 4 E 6 7 8 9 10 11112 13 14 15 16 17 ..'MANUFACTURING Camtom m'eJLolieL.a;e~e e. eaheilileMi Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ilet.m I+l k I+i*l lob [] Heavy · OFFICE PROF~.SSIONALs DESIGN & RESEARCI.I Professional/Design Services · 4. 4. 4. · · 4. 4. · 4. + · · WHOLESALE~ STORAGE & DISTRIBLM'ION , Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Heavy 4. · + · COMMERCIAL Animal Care bream., nest store. t I ]i ~ + L~ [] --~ ; ._eJ /atemotive Rental/Leasing · · · + Am,e,,/u~t T,,~ ,,,Hk~ [] + []! + Automotive / Truck Repair-Major · ,J,· t · · ,(,4.. 4. Automotive Service Station + '+ 4. + + 4. 4. 4. + + + + mdk,.~ co.b'ector'. orn, & v.,.,. [] + [] + Building Contractor's Storage Yard · s.em,mteme, kre,, [] ~·~ei·[] []-[]-ile~ Building & Lighting Equipment Supplies& Sales· 4.· 4.4. · · ,I,· 4. !,!.· SuekumS,m~net, daSemoe, · ~ [] · [] · Ji;· [] ~..~·[] · -.!· [] BusMoo Support brvJces · 0'4- · · 4- · · · 4- + · · · · 4- · · Convenience Sales &Services + bune&ed,kmbtaoae,mm · []* l" I*.l· l* [] · []· []!,[] Entertainment + + + + + + + + + Fast Fond Sales Fond & Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales &Rentals 4- 4- '4- 4- + 4- 4- 4- · Laundry Services · · · · · · · Pharmacies & Specialty ~ Medical/Health Stores /Recreational Feclltles + tl.lr__s..~i , ._ Scrap Operation . \,,S~ecialty 9u~lcl~ng Supplies i' and Home Improvements ,CIVIC Cultural · FloOd Control/Utility Corridor · · · e' · · · · · · · .~m~A, mmm, - 4-~ 14-1+i!+~ 11~+~+14-1 Public Safety & Utility Services IP-InduetrJal Park GI-General industrial MI/HI-Mlnjmum Impact Heavy Industrial Ha-Haven Ave. OverJay District HI-Heavy Industrial III-5 Revised: 1/20/88 8/15/90 3/06/91 SUBAREA 7 Land Use Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and community oriented non- industrial area' and is a gateway to the City. A major industrial, office, and commercial development on approximately 300 acres is currently undergoing phased construction. Within this area is a planned Civic Center which will include San Bernardino County and City offices- Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Administrative and Office Professional/Design Services Research Services Light Wholesale, Storage, Distribution Building Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel/Motel Administrative Civic Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor Conditional Uses Automotive Rental/Leasing Automotive Sales Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales Medical/Health Care Services Personal Services Recreation Facilities Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Religious Assembly Pharmacies and Specialty Medical Stores Medical and Hospital Supply e~ Specialty Building Supp}ies and Home Improvements IV-48 TABLE III-2 ADDITION TO: LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS D. COMMERCIAL USE TYPES Business Supply Retail and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: rete~ sales, rental or repair {ram t½e premises of office equipment, furnishings, and e~ee supplies, end e~m~er e~ee rather then te {nd~v~due~s excluding materials used in construction. · hey eMe~ude the ea~e e{ materials used ~n eenetruet~en e{ buildings er Business Support Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: services which support the activity of businesses, {~rms. such as, clerical, employment, protective, messenger/facsimile services, postal/mail receiving and packaging, and minor processing, including blueprint services and multi-copying e{ pamph{e~s and ema~½ reper~e {sT anether {~rmv Activities not included in this classification are the printing of books and services of a personal nature. Pharmacies and Specialty Medical/Health Stores: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sale of prescription and "over-the- counter" drugs, health and diet products, and incidental sales of beauty supplies. Uses excluded from this catego=7 are general merchandise "drug stores ," Medical and Hospital SuDDlV= Activities typically include, but are not limited to= sale and rental of medical/hospital equipment, supplies, and prosthetic devices. Personal Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: information, instruction and similar services of a personal nature; Sees typ~ea~y ~me~udeT but are Rat ~m~eed tat such as, computer training, driving schools, day care facilities, travel bureaus, and art/music/dance/martial arts/photographic phete~rephT studios. Specialty Buildinq Supplies and Home Xmprovements= Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint, wall/floor/window coverings, doors and windows, building materials, hardware, pl,~mhing and electrical supplies, bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, swimming pools and supplies, and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet or less. Uses excluded from this category are general merchandise stores. CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ,,:,,?"'~ii~ STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHIBATA - A residential subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre ), located 4~ on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 91-29. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of the subdivision map, detailed site plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, building elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 9.3 dwelling units per acre- C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Senior apartments; Senior Housing Overlay District, High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Future condominiums; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family residential; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: A single family home and several trees and shrubs exist on the site. ITEM D PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 2 F. Parking Calculations: Parking Garage Garage Number of Number Required Total Req ' d Garage Spaces Spaces Bedrooms of Units Per Unit Re~'d Spaces/unit Re~'d Provided Three 13 2.0 26 2 26 26 Guest 0.25 3 TOTAL 13 29 26 26 Total Parking Required 29 Total Parking Provided 31 ANALY S I S: A. General: The proposed tract consists of 13 condominium units, with 2 duplexes, 1 four-plex, and a five-unit building. The buildings are plotted along a "T" drive aisle that provides access to the parcels east and west of the site. The units have three bedrooms and range from 1,493 to 1,586 square feet. Each unit has a two-car garage, and five guest parking spaces have been provided. The project complies with the recently adopted multi-family standards. Amenities include a large open lawn area, pool, tot lot, and a barbeque area. Laundry hookups will be provided, and storage space is provided in the garages- B. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on four occasions- A major issue was reducing the project density to the lowest end of the permitted density range because the parcel is only 1.4 acres in size. The project was last seen by the Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, Vallette, Coleman) on January 16, 1992. The Committee recommended approval of the revised project, which reduced the total number of units from 17 to 13, subject to the following condition which has been incorporated into the revised plans: 1. The row of garage doors on the five-plex should have an offset to break up the elevation and to provide additional landscaping along the drive aisles. The elevations in the' revised packet depict the five-plex building, but do not show a duplex or four-plex version. However, the Committee noted that a four-plex was reviewed in the earlier versions of the project and that the duplexes would be similar to the three-plex shown in Exhibit "G-l" and could be addressed by staff during plan check- C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on November ~, 1991, and recommended approval subject to the conditions PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 3 which have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at their November 5, 1991 meeting. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. While completing Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff determined that additional studies would be required to assess the amount of noise generated by 19th Street and to determine the health and significance of trees located on the site. 1. Acoustical Analysis: In order to mitigate the noise generated by 19th Street to a less than significant level, the four- and five-unit buildings must have 5-foot sound barriers on the south side of the southerly patios and 4-foot sound barriers on the south side of the southerly balconies of the end units (nos. 1 and 5)- The project is 300 feet away from the future Route 30 Freeway and is buffered by the three-story apartments to the north. 2. Tree Removal Permit 91-29: The site has many mature trees, most of which are in conflict with existing and proposed improvements. An arborist report was prepared for this site to determine the significance of the trees and the feasibility of relocating those trees which are in conflict with the proposed development. As a result, the following recommendations have been made (see Exhibit "D". ) a) Trees No. 6-10, 13, 16, 22, 24: Not subject to protection because of size or species. Replacement trees are not required. b) Trees No. 1, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, 21: Arborist recommends removal because of poor health, structure, or species of tree. These trees should be replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available. c ) Trees No. 4, 5, 12, 17, 19: Arborist recommends preservation through transplantation elsewhere on-site · Plotting should be incorporated into the final landscape plan. d) Trees No. 2, 3, 23: Off-site, conservable. These trees should be protected during construction because of their proximity to the proposed improvements- After reviewing the acoustical analysis and arborist report, staff has determined that any significant effects created by the project will be reduced to a less than significant level with the incorporation of the proposed mitigation measures PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 4 which include the construction of sound walls, tree relocation, and replacement. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Commission to approve this application, the following facts for findings must be made: A. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; B. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; C. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and D. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity- CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valle~ Daily Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 15247, and the related Design Review, through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Resp ~ly s ted, er BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Tree Identification Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Resolution of Approval for Design Review I I I I ; I I : I ~ I I ~ ~ I I I I ~ UC~ONOA Gr/~ zB ~ r " F " o, . ~-/z RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15247, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FOR 13 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 1.4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-474-05 A. Recitals. (i) Mr. Royce Shibata has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15247 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th of March, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites pri~r to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution- NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue with a street frontage of 186 feet and lot depth of 321 feet and is presently occupied by a single family home and a number of trees and other vegetation; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is high density senior housing, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the property to the east is slated for future multi- family development, and the property to the west is a single family home. (c) The application contemplates the development of 13 condominium units within an area zoned Medium Residential by the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Con~nission hereby finds and concludes as follows= (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code~ and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat~ and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq D~v~sion 1) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be-issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 3 In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing la Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2) To mitigate significant adverse noise impacts from 19th Street traffic, the applicant shall construct 5-foot sound attenuation barriers on the south side of the patios and 4-foot sound attenuation barriers on the south side of the balconies of the two units adjacent to 19th Street. The final barrier designs shall be approved by the City Planner. 3) Tree Removal Permit No. 91-29 is hereby approved subject to the following mitigation measures: a) Trees No. 6-10, ~3, 16, 22 and 24 are not heritage trees and shall be removed. b) Trees No. 1, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 21 shall be removed and replaced with the largest nursery-grown stock available to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to occupancy. c) Trees No. 4, 5, 12, 17, and 19 shall be preserved by transplanting elsewhere on-site to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to occupancy. One-year after transplanting the trees, the applicant shall submit a written report to the City Planner from a qualified arborlet evaluating the health and condition of the trees and making recommendations for their care or replacement. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any trees as recommended by the arborist within 90 days of said report, in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08.100. The applicant shall submit documentation of the right-of-entry to perform said work to the satisfaction of the .City Attorney prior to final map recordation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 4 d) Trees No. 2, 3, and 23, which are located off-site, shall be protected during construction activity as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08,110. e) All trees required to be preserved shall be protected as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08,110. Construction barriers shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. f) All trees required to be preserved shall be properly maintained in accordance with the arborists's recommendations, including watering and pruning, until final occupancy release. g) Approval of- this Tree Removal Permit No. 91-03 shall be valid for a period of 90 days, subject to extension. The 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or grading permits, whichever comes first. h) The Planning Division (and, if applicable, Engineering Division) shall be contacted within 30 days of the planting of the trees to conduct an inspection. i) A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division which calls out the number, size, and location of the heritage trees which are to be preserved, as well as replacement trees. Such plans must be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Enoineerina Division 1) An in-lieu fee, as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of 19th Street, shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 5 2) Construct a storm drain and catch basin within 19th Street from approximately 100 feet west of the west project boundary to meet the existing storm drain pipe located approximately 100 feet east of the east project boundary in accordance with the City plan for the storm drain. 3) The developer shall reimburse the City for street improvements adjacent to the project if the City project to improve 19th Street is underway prior to approval of the final map. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: D-/q DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: 'T"~/rPrF, ~/F~ T'~b~r(: r / ~Z"~r 7 SUBJECT: 7'~,~ ~t.~' ~/z,q('c,r APPLICANT: ~y'(,t~ ~'HI /J~rr tl Those items checked am Conditions of Approval.- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNI$1ON, (714) 9G9-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits .C, msdmmj;~ w/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, if building permits are / / not issued or approved use has not coritneht~dwlthin -24 rfiohlhs frOm thedte of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shag be approved prior to I t .: · / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / /-- 4. Theclevelopershailcommence, particiPate in, artcl consummate or cause to be c°mmenced / / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the ·Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of .... a fire station to ~erve the development. The stalin shall be located, designed, and built to all specilications of the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts prope6y.upon ~n. TI~ equiliment shail be, aelectiNI byethe District in accordancewilh its needs;-,in airy lautidiag ~f a sllm, the daveleper shall conq)ty with all apC~icable~ws and regullkats. The CFD sham be formed by the Disffict and the developer by the tirne recordation of the final map occurs. first, the applicant shall consent to, or_ participate in, the estal~s. hment of. a Mel!~.Boos Community Facilities District lot the construc~n and maintenance. of necessary school facilities. However, ff any school district' hB previously estBl:)lished such a Community Fadlities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, cor~ent to ,the annexation ol the project site into the territory of such e~isting District I;~ior to the re~ordation of the final map or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes first. Further, il the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelVe months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the reoordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC-2/91 loll2 D~20 ~is ~H~n shall ~ wa~ ~ the C~ r~es ~t~ that the a~l~nt a~ all aff~ ~1 d~d~s Mve eme~ i~ an agme~N to ~ae~ a=m~date any a~ all ~=1 i~s, a re~ of thi ~. /6. P~r to re~r~t~n of the final m~ or p~r to issua~ of ~ildi~ ~s when ~ mp is i~olved, w~en ce~ff~t~n from t~ aff~ water dii~ tha addate sewer and water facilHies are or will ~ avail~le to seNe t~ ~s~ pmje~ s~ll ~ subm~ to the Depanmem of Com~n~y Deve~p~m. Such i~er m~ have Nen issu~ by the water di~w~hin90daysp~rtofi~ ~a~valintNMseofsu~Nisbnorp~rtoissua~e of ~s in the Mse of all ot~r reelNil ~j~. B. S~e Deve~em ~ 1. ~e she shall ~ deve~ a~ maintain~ in a=~ wHh ~e ~mved plans wh~h i~de ~e ~a~, amh~e~uml e~vat~, e~e~r ~e~s a~ ~m, I~~, s~n p~mm, a~ gradi~ on fit in tM P~ni~ D~lln, ~e ~M~ ~mai~ herein, Deve~p~m C~e r~ulab~ a~ S~ff~ Plan a~ Plann~ Commune. 2. Prbr to any use of the pm~ she or ~sine~ a~i~ ~i~ ~m~n~d ther~n, all ~ions of ~roval s~l N ~m~t~ to t~ ~t~ion of tN C~ P~n~r. 3.' ~~oft~fadl~ys~ll~m~u~il~t~afiUn~iMi~a~ Sate Fire Ma~MII's r~lat~ M~ Nen ~~ dh. P~r to ~M~, N~ shall N submtN to the. Ra~ C~m~a Fire Pmt~ D~ a~ h ~i~i~ a~ Safety D~is~n to s~ ~l/~. T~ ~i~i~ ~il N i~~ f~ ~~ pdor to ~ 4. Revis~ s~e ~a~ a~ ~iti~ eMvtlm ~~i~ d ~~ of ~val shall ~ subm~ for C~ Plan~r mv~ ~ ~val ~r ~ ~~ ol ~i~i~ ~its. / 5. All s~e, grading, laM~, i~t~n, a~ ~ret i~ve~m ~a~ s~ ~ ~ffiinat~ for ~i~e~ p~rto ~a~ d a~ ~ (~ ~ g~, ~e mmval, e~hmem, ~i~i~, etc.), or ~ to Ill ~ ;vi in tN ~ of a ~mom ~ ~bn, or ~d use Ms ~m~, ~er ~ f~. 6. ~al d ~ ~ s~l ~ wa~ ~~ ~ il ~m d tN ~ve~m ~, aH other a~/~ ~~, ~ ~ ~~ R~ ~ ~ic Pi~ in ~ ~ ~ ti~ of ~i~ h~e ~a~. / 7. A ~N on~e I~Mi~ ~ sMI M ~~ ~ ;~ ~ tN C~ PinNr a~ SN~s ~~N (~11 ) p~r ~ tM i~a~ of ~iM~ ~. S~ ~an shall i~e ~e, BuSkin, ~n, M~N, aM ~ ~ ~iMi~ ~ M ~t I ;e~ely ~ 8. If m ~mmlb~ tr~ ~~ am ~, a~ ~ ~p eMIl N f~ i~al un~s w~h all ~~ / 9. Trash ~M(s) am aM ~e ~r ~ ~h ~~ eMIl M ~ to C~ ~r ~e aN ~val ~r to ~an~ of ~i~i~ ~es. ~ 10. All g~~ ~il~ a~neM~s ~ as tmnlo~m, AC ~~e~, ec., Shall N ~t~ ~t of pu~ ve a~ ad~ate~ ~ree~ th~h tN uH ~ a ~ation of ~rete or m~n~ walls, N~i~, an~or ~~i~ to the st~a~n of the Cffy Planner. Pn~j~ .,,-o.:'rT I~z~") Completion Daub: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / / · the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. v'/'' 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identitied in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fenring, and / / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading pins. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Co nditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. P'//'15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. v/16. Allparkways, openareas, and landscaping shall beperrnanentlymaintalnad bytheproperty / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submittad for City Planner and City Engineer review and · approval prior to issuance of building permits. v""' 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, dernolitbn, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Altertalon Permit subject to Historic Preservation Cornmission review and aplxoval. C. Building Design p/" 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Ranner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. v'/ 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural ---j' treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. SC-2/9! 3°tr12 D '2 Co.,_dcdo. D.tc: / 3. Sla~affi ~t~ rover plans for use by t~ Ho~nem' ~i~n shall be subm~ for / J C~ Pin~r a~ ~i~i~ ~ial revi~ a~ ~pmval ~rto i~a~e of ~i~i~ ~s. 4. All ~f ~enames, indudi~ air ~ne~ a~ ot~r pmje~ns, s~ll ~ shie~ from vi~ a~ the s~nd ~er~ from adjacem pm~ffies a~ ~reets ~ r~uir~ by the Planni~ Divi~n. Such screening shall ~ amh~urally im~rat~ w~h the ~i~i~ desert a~ ~~ to the s~i~n of the C~y Planner. Details shall ~ includ~ in ~i~i~ pla~. D. Pa~lng a~ Veh~ir Ac~ (Indite d~lll ~ bulMIng ~anl) ~ 1. All ~ffii~ bt i~i ila~s shall ~ve a rainira m omsl dimens~ n of 6 feet a~ shall / / ~main a 12-imh wal ad~m to t~ pa~i~ stall (~i~ ~m). ~ 2. Te~ur~ ~m~n pm~ays a~ te~ur~ Nve~ ~mss ci~n ais~s shall ~ / / proved thmug~ t~ ~ve~m to ~n~ ~elli~Nun~i~i~ w~ ~n s~ce~ plazaNr~reat~nal uses. ~ 3. All ~i~ ~a~s shall N ~ble m~ ~r C~ ~aMa~ a~ all d~ay aisles, / / emm~s, a~ exRs shall ~ ~ ~r C~ ma~a~. / 4. All un~s shall ~ ;v~ed wHh gara~ ~r o~Mm ff d~eays are iss tMn 18 feet in / / ~h from ~ of s~alk. J 5. ~eCovenams,~it~a~Res~nssMIImm~thestora~of~rem~nalveh~s / / on thl sRe unlss tNy am tN ~NI ~ of tmn~m~n for tM omr aN pmhib~ ~i~ on inte~r ~lm~n ai~ mMr ~an in d~Mt~ ~eor Hmi~ areas. / 6. P~ for any s~ gmes s~ll N ~ml~ for tN C~ Pinner, CIW E~i~e r, a~ / ./ . Ra~ C~m~a Fire Pmtffi~n D~ mviw a~ ;vi ~rto ima~ of ~i~i~ ~Rs. E. ~nd~plng (f~ ~IIcN mlmll i~ s~, mlr to lln N.) ~ 1. A ~tai~ la~ aM ~In ~an, im~ s~ ~affi~ a~ ~1 ~m i~ / / i~ in tM ~e ~ reslmll devemm, amhR~ and ~b~M for C~ Ran~r ~ ~ ;~1 ~to tM m~ of ~i~i~ ~es or p~r fiMI ~ ~al in tN ~ d a ~tom ~ ~~n. / 2. ~i~tmes~ir~toN~ffip~s~M~~dha~~n~r / / in ~m~ ~ ~ Mu~ ~ ~ 19. ~. 110, ~ ~ m~ on t~ g~ ~ans. ~e ~of ~se ~m to M ~e.w~ in m ~ ne ~m f~~am~ trees s~ll ~ s~ on t~ ~ti~ I~ pi~. ~ ~m ~il fin d of ~ a~t's r~mmi~ ~i~ mHwm~n, tmn~i~i~ a~ td~ ~s. 3. Aminimm~ ~ ~ trHs~rgmss m,~~dffiefol~s~es, s~ll~Pm~d~ / / w~hin t~ ~j~: % - ~- imh ~x or la~er, I O % - 3~ i~ ~x or la~er, t 0 % - 2~ i~h ~x or i~r, __ % - 1 ~a~, a~ __ % - 5 ~lln.' 4. A ~nimm of ~ 0 % of trHs ~m~ ~in the ~ ~all M ~i~n s~e trees - / / 24-i~ ~x or / 5. ~thin ~i~ ~ts, trees s~ll ~ ~am~ m a rme of one l~l~n trH ~r e~W three / /_ ~i~ malls, ~fficiem to ~ 5~/~ of the ~mi~ area m ~ir ~n on ~m 21. Project No.: 6. Trees shall ~ plam~ in areas of publ~ vi~ adjacem to a~ a~ng stm~u res at a rate of one tree ~r 30 li~ar feet of ~iMi~. / / 7. AIl~tesb~s5f~torlessinve~l~hta~of5:l orgmaters~,~tle~than / / 2:1 s~, shall ~, at ~nimm, iqat~ a~ landn~ w~h ~date gmu~ ~ver lor emsbn ~rol. 9o~ pla~i~ r~uir~ by this s~bn shall i~lu~ a pe~nem i~at~n sy~em to ~ in~all~ by the deve~r pmr to ~~. 8. AIIp~ates~sinexcessof5feet,but~ssthan8 feet inven~alhe~andof2:l orgreater / sb~ shall be la~md aM i~t~ for eros~n ~mml a~ to ~en t~ir a~ara~e as folbws: one 15~al~n or la~er s~e tm ~r each 150 ~. ~. of s~ area, 1 ~al~n or la~er s~e shrub ~r each 100 ~. ~. of s~ area, aM ~m~te gr~ ~ver. In a~ion, s~ ~nks in ex~ss of 8 feet in ved~l heigM a~ of 2:1 or greater s~ eMIl al~ imlude o~ 5~albn or la~er s~e tree ~r each ~0 ~. ffi ~ s~ area. Trees a~ shm~ shall ~ plam~ in ma~emd clustem to ~en aM vaW s~ Nne. SIo~ ~ami~ r~uir~ by ~is s~ion shall i~lude a ~anem i~atbn sy~em to N inmall~ W t~ ~ve~r p~r to ~~y. 9. For sidle fa~ res~emial deve~pmm, all sb~ ~i~ a~ i~abn shall ~ ~mim- / ous~ mintain~ in a heaR~ a~ thdvi~ ~Hbn by t~ ~ve~r umil e~h i~i~dual un~ is ~ a~pid Wt~ ~yer. P~rto mleasi~pa~for~e u~s, an i~n shall ~ ~~ by t~ Ranni~ D~isbn to deem~ t~ tMy m in mid~oW 10. For mu~i-fami~ res~e~ial a~ ~res~emial ~~, ~ ~ are res~ / sible for the ~ntinual ~imena~e of il IM~ areas on-s~e, ~ well as ~m~us plam~ are. w~hin the ~ ~M~f-way. All la~ am. ~ N k~ Ire from we~s a~ dens a~ ~i~i~ in a hea~ a~ ~i~ ~bn, ~ shall r~e~e r~ular pmning, feffil~i~, ~i~, a~ td~i~. ~y a~, NM, d~ea~, or d~ying pare ~eMI shall N r~ ~in 30 aye from t~ le ~ ~. 11. Front yaffi la~ng eMIl N rli~ ~r tN ~ve~m ~ ~ Ior / . ~is r~im~ sM~ ~ ~ ~n to t~ r~uir~ ~met trees a~ s~ ~ami~. 12. ~e final ~s~n of t~ ~d~er ~ays, wall, i~~, a~ s~al~ s~ll ~ / i~ in t~ rei~ la~ Nns a~ ell N ~ to C~ Pm~r rove a~ ~val a~ =ffii~ for ~m~e~ dh a~ ~ay ~~ Nn ~ ~y N rlimd by t~ E~i~q D~ibn. 13. S~li~fea~r~u~~,il~~,~s~tr~,~a~r- / i~ s~wa~ (~h ~o~i ~e), a~ i~e~ i~~, · ~ir~ 14. La~i~ 8~ i~i~n Wie~ ~irN ~ M i~ w~ t~ ~ ~M~l-way on / t~ ~d~er ~ t~ pm~ ma sll M ~mi~ mai~ ~ t~ ~elr. 15. All walls s~ll ~ pm~ w~h ~~ tm~. ~ ~N ~ Mk ~en~e am~, / t~ ~s~n shil ~ ~ffiintN w~ t~ ~im~ D/. 16. TrH mime~ ~e~ ~l ~ de~ a~ ~N for C~ ~r me a~ / ~1 ~r ~ i~a~ of ~i~ ~s. ~ ~e~ sll ~~ ~e ~tural g~h mar~ed~ of the sel~ tre ~is. 17. ~~i~ and i~m~n ~all ~ ~;~ ~ ~nHNe water t~ ~ primes of / Xedm ~ defi~ in C~er 19.16 ~ ~ Ra~ Cuum~ Mun~l ~. SC - 2/9 1 5 of 12 P "2 C// P~oi~ .~o. Co,,d=uo,, D.,-: F. Signs 1. ~elgnsi~onthesum~pla~are~e~ualonlyand~ta~dof this~mval. / / Any s;~ m~d for this ~ve~pmnt shall ~;~ w~h the S~n Offiina~e a~ shall r~uim ~mte ~l~tion a~ ~pmval by the Pinni~ DNis~n p~r to inmallat~n of any s ns. ~ 2. A U nffo~ S~n PrOram for this deve~pmem shall ~ subm~ for C~ Planner revi~ a~ / ~mval pdor to ~sua~e of bui~i~ ~s. / 3. Dir~oW mnumem s~n(s) shall ~ pmv~ for ~dmm, ~ominium, or townSins / / p~r to ~~ a~ shall r~im separme a~n a~ royal by t~ Planni~ D~is~n pdor to ~sua~e of ~i~i~ ~Rs. G. Environmental 1. ~e deve~r shall prov~e ea~ pros~ive ~yer w~en mt~ of the Foudh Street Ro~ / / Cms~r pmj~ in a sta~ard fo~at ~ detem~ by the C~y Pinner, ~rto a~pti~ a cash ~s~ on any pm~. 2. ~e ~velo~r shall pm~de ea~ pms~e ~yer ~en ~ of tM C~ ~ / / S~il S~is Zo~ for the R~ Hill FauR, in a ma~affi fo~ ~ ~e~i~ by the C~y Planner, p~r to a~e~i~ a ~ ~s~ on a~ ~. / 3. ~e deve~r shall mv~e e~h ~~e ~yer ~en ~t~ of t~ Foothill Fre~ay / / pm~ in a sta~ard fo~ B ~te~i~ ~ t~ C~ Pin~r, ~r to ~i~ a ~sh ~ on a~ ~. / 4. A final ~m~l re~d s~ll ~ ~m~ed ~r C~ Pinner rev~ a~ ~mval ~or to the / / is~a~e of ~i~i~ ~s. TM final r~ s~ d~ss t~ ivel of ime~r ~ise a~enum~n to be~w 45 CNEL, t~ ~i~i~ ~edai ~ ~nm~n t~n~ues ~v~, a~ ~ ~mpdme, ve~ t~ ~a~ of t~ m~n m~ms. ~ ~i~i~ ~ans will c~ for ~No~ wRh t~ ~atln ma~res ~main~ in t~ fi~ r~. H. ~her AgenciM / 1. Em~H~~sM~v~ina~mw~hRa~~aFire / / Pmt~bn Dim~ /2. Em~m~s~llN~v~,~e~frea~clar, a minimmof26f~tw~e / / m all tires ~d~ ~~~ in a~ffim dh Rm ~~ Fire Pmt~n D~ rlimmnl. 3. P~r to ~~ of ~i~i~ ~ f~ ~~ ~mm~n, e~me sMII ~ / / suml~ to tN Rm Cu~m~ Rm P~m D~ t~ te~m~ wmer m~ for fire protein i aviM, ~i~ m~m d ~ fire ~tffiln s~;. / 4. ~e ~m sMII ~mm ~ u. S. P~al ~ t ~e~N tM ~me ~ a~ / / ~n of rail ~xes. Muei-fa~ r.~effii ~emm s~l mvl a ~1~ ovemead st~ure for rail ~xes wHh mme I~Ni~. ~e f~al ~In d ~ ~1 ~xes aM the ~s;n of tM ovemad m~m mall N ~ffi to C~ Pin~r r~ aM ;val p~r to tM ma~e ~ ~i~i~ e~s. 5. For pm~s usi~ se~ ta~ f~ilitis, w~en ~dff~n of m~l~, i~di~ all / / su~nNe iffio~t~n, sMII N oMai~ from ~ ~n ~mffii~ ~ ~mm of Emimnmmal HeaRh a~ subm~ to the ~i~i~ ~il ~r to tN i.ua~e of ~ptic Ta~ Pe~Rs, a~ pr~r to issua~e of ~i~i~ H~s. APPLICAN~ SHA~ CONTA~ ~E BUILDING AND SAF~ DIVISION, ~14) ~1~, FOR COMPLIANCE I~ ~E FOLLOWING ~NDITIONS: I. S~e ~ve~em ~. ~e~Nshall~ywHht~late~pt~Un~Bui~i~C~e, UnHo~M~hani- cal C~e, Unffo~ P~mbi~ ~, Nat~nal E~ ~e, a~ all ot~r a~i~ble ~des, offiina~s, a~ r~lt~ in ~ at t~ ti~ of ~ame of reltNe ~s. Please ~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ SMe~ D~n for ~es of t~ ~ ~n Offii~e a~ ~l~ie han~uts. /' 2. P~r to ~sua~ of ~i~i~ ~s for anN resi~l ~elli~ une(s) or m~r a~n to ex~ti~ un~(s), tN ~~ ~all ~y Nve~m fes ~ tN etli~ rae. ~ fees my i~e, b~ am mt lime~to: C~ ~au~n Fe, Pa~ Fe, ~in~ Fee, Syle~ ~ve~nt Fee, Pe~ a~ Pin Ch~i~ Fes, a~ ~1 Fes. 3. P~r to i~a~ of ~i~i~ ~M for a ~ ~~ or i~Idal ~vemm or a~R~n to an exi~i~ ~eve~m, t~ ~m sMII ~ ~~m fees ~ t~ e~lisMd rte. ~ch fees my i~e, ~ are ~t li~M to: Syme~ Devemnt Fee, Drain~ Fee, ~1 Fees, Pe~R aM Pin Ch~ Fes. /' 4. Streta~re~ssMIlMpm~by~i~i~~,~etr~~l~r~t~n aM ~r to i~ame of ~i~i~ ~M. J. bl~lng 1. Pmvl ~ii~e weh tM Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~ ~r ~e ~ ltM clara~es ~nsld~ use, area, aM fim~esi~NeM~ 2. ~i~ ~i~i~ shall N ~e to ~ weh ~ ~iti~ ~ zoni~ r~u~ for tM i~e~ use or tM ~i~i~ sMII M Nml~. 3. ~i~~di~sal la~lm s~M m~vM, f~a~or~to~ywHh tM Un~o~ P~ ~ 4. U~muM o~e ~la~ e to M ~e aM ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~M Mr ~i~i~ ~ ~t~n. K. G~I~ / 1. Gradi~ of IN ~ ~y all M ~ ~ w~h N U~ ~i~i~ ~, C~ ~. A ~ils ~ ~H M ~M ~do~ ~ ~. 3. ~e Nve~m ~ ~e weh~ tM ~ e~n ~1 ii: a ~ ~me Pe~ i rlirM. Pi~ ~ ~n Na~ ~u~ ~~ of ~re i (714) ~7-2111 tot ~ ~~n. ~~n of ~ ~ i M ~M to ~ C~ ~r ~ IN ~~ of ~ gi~ ~. 4. A ~~1 r~ sMII M W~rM ~ a qual~ e~r ~ ~~ ~ ~lM at tM t~ of ~l~n for gr~ ~an / 5. ~efiMIgrMi~Nns~allN~t~aM~vM~rilmof~i~i~~s. sc-2191 70f12 Z)',Z ~:~ 6. AS a custom-lit SutX:liviSK)n, trqe following requirements shall 0e met: a. Surety srtall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing corrq:letlin of all on-site / drainage facilities necessan/for dewatenn~ all parcels to tlqe satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division pnor to final ma,o al:~roval and pnor to the issuance of grading permets. D. A,opropdate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducte0 onto / / or over adjacent parcels, are to I:e clelineate0 an0 recon:leO to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division I:Nior to ismjartce of gr~llng and t3uilding perrn~ts, c, On-site drair~ge irr~ovements. necessary for alewatering ar~l protecting the sulxlivlded / / properties, are to I:e installed prior to imm of 13uik:ling peffnitl for consmjction upon any parcel that may I:e su~ect to 0rainage flows entenng, ~emnng, or within a parcel relative to which a INilding permit is requemed. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to 13e mjI}mitted to the Building In(I Safety / / Division for royal prior to mince of I:uilding and gracing permira. (Thi= rn~y ba on an incremental or camporate Dais.) e. All slope banks in excels of 5 feet in veftir41 heignl Ihlll tie soedecl wilh native grasses t / or piimed with ground cover for erosion control upon comCletion of grm:llng or some other alternmive method of erosion control ~ lie completed to Ihe Illillmction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrlVation system M tie pmvkt~. This requirement does not release the al:q:Nicant/cleveloper from o~ with the slope planting requirementl ol Section 17.08.040 1 of the Devek3pntlnt Cool. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, {714) Ill-lll~, FOR COMPLIANCE wrrH THE FOLLOqNING CONDITIONS: L D~llclllon aM VehlCullr Mcel8 ~. Rigre-of-way and easements sham tx cJocicated to the CNy for M tmmW INl:Ic streets, .--./ / commu~tmiM, ~ pae~, ~ ~ m, mmet treee, m'd lNl~c emnmge factliesashownonthelil~nelnd/~ttenlllvefrel). Pfivele~f~'non-pul}lc facilitl (Croll-lol drljnlge, II:t,,ll fietilt IrlM, etc.) M tie ~ II IIIOMI on the plap4 2. Dealaction shall M mile ol I~ folewlr~ d~lU-ol-way on 1~ pltSmeter mm --J / (memrKI from Ilree~ centerline): ~ ~ a teet en / ? r ~ ~ tetllfeeten totll feet on tolal leet on 3. An irmvocN~eolferel{letlicalienfor 4eotwldemadwayeammentshalMmaOe /- fOr all private mrem Or drives. 5, Recil:m:)cal access elsemerits still t:)e DmvkMci efeuflng Iccefi to Ill Dlrclls tW CC&Rs Or Dy (lea alxI Sham be retort:led cortojrrlrl~/wlh thl ~ Or ~ I0 Wll ~,l~llr~e Of tNilcling portoits, where no rna~ 8 ,nvolved. 5C -2/gt sort2 p',Z "~ 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage Shall I~e ;rov~ed and snail 0e delineated or ~t~ on the final m~. 7. ~e fiMI ~ sh~ clea~ ~lineate a 10-foot mini~m bui~i~ mm~en area on the ~ig~dng tt ~ini~ t~ zero lot line wNI a~ ~main the fol~wi~ I8n~age: constrain of (re$~mil) ~i~i~s (or o~r s~l) w~hin ~$e Iml$ on me mm ~ ~i~i~ re~en A ~intena~e agree~ ~lll a~ N ~m~ from e~ ~t to ~e/m ~t t~g~ tM CC&R's. tN fiMI ~. s~ N i~ to me C~ ~e ~ e~ ~ ~m m. lO.~n~l~~~s~~~~mm~,~~~~m m a~ tN ~-de ~ ~mm ~ m ~n e m ~. ~ SC - 219 1 e o[ li ~ _ ~ 8 NoteS: (a) Median island includes landscapirxj and imgation on meter. (1~) Pavement reconstNclion and overlays will 0e cletermmed dunng plan check. (C) If so marked, walk shell I~e curvilinear ;:Hit STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of constructran fee snail be I::H'Ovided for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lightS, prepared by a rqis- .---/ / tered Civil Engineer, shall I~l ~ilted to and II3:H~vI(I by the City F,,figinler. Secure/ shell be posted and an agreement executm:l to the salislactlon of the City Engineer and the City Altomy guaranteeing completion of the pulak and/or pdvete street ifTq:XOve- merits, priorto final map approval orthe ilmjlnce of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being perfore'led In ~ right-of-way, feel sill be Hid and a / / construction permit shell I:m obllirmcl from the Cly Englnlef'l Office in ack:tkm to any other permits required. c. Pavement stdplng. maddft, traffic. street name igning. and i~tefcofinect conduit / / shall be instalad to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signllcx)~duttwlthpullboxelShlHbeinlllHlClOnlnyfmwCOfiltfIJClJOnorreCOnl~act~ /, / of major, semndey or coOecmr stmets whlch inleemcl wim other mNor, secondary or coleclot me for future 9affic NVnalm. Pul bone shal be pieced on both sides of the stmet at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECRo~anyomeflocalloneaplxovedbytheCltyEngtheer. Note: / / (1) NI pua boxes 8hd b, No. 6 unleu oUwfwi, 8p,cmed by the CRy En01nHf. (2) Condue ~ b, 3-inch 01v,nized mNI wire pulmp,. ,. vvh**l ~ romp, ,hll b, inmded on d lout Q0m,q 01 inlefl, cllor4 per CIty--'// Stuncirca or u dimcUd by th, Cm/En0m,~. cl,po~shilbepmvid,d loQovetlmoNlol0fBk01ndpmvln0, reunom:lu~n~~me{:w~mNcl~ImeellacledmC~E~r. g. Concenlmeddrllfl~llowllmlnmmldewakB. Undw~~ Shall N / / inmMdlo CItykmdlfil, exQeplWlm01e fwMy loll. n. xandicepm~~shdbeamedledbytheClyr:n0m~. / /-- i. Stre~nwmseWlbealmmved~theCm/PWvw'lmm'msulmvlmlfodrmplncheck. / / 5. Sireel imOmvemenl I:Mns ~ Cly Slmdmmloral I:dvle mshalllx, lxovlmd to, /--'-- ravewand appmvW by me Cly Sn0inew. Pm, mmy wmkbWIQINmnmdon me ~.- ! ' vale streets. fHmmbel~idandmmmjceonlNmlmmm~~mC~ .. EnQinew's 0Wice in addleon m any ome permira ~ 6. Slmel tmel, I minif~m ol lS.~llon lizl or ImVm', ~ I)e inllllld plf Cly SIIndams in _ _ accomance wilh tl~ Cily's strum tree SC - 2/gl i0o( 12 p- 2- ~ v_ 7. linersection line of site des~3ns shall be reviewed I:}y the City Er~Sneer for contormance wftn adopted I:)OlloY- ---/-- -- a. On collector or larger streets. lines of s~nl slyall be ptolled for all projec~ ir~ersections. --J -/ incluclir~} clOveways. WallS, signs. and slopes shall be k:x:aed outs~e me lines of Landscaping and Olher ol~"truCtions witl~in me lines of signl snail Ic}e al~roved oy me City Engineer. I}. Local residential street intersec,ons slyall have their nmiceal~ility improved, usually t}y __/ / moving the 2 +/- closest slrHi trees on eacl~ side away from tl~e street and placed in a street tree easefTlenl. ~ from CALTI:IANS for any worn wtlhin trm following right-of-way: / / All pul)llc irnpmvemenls on the following slreetl still be operatforally coral:line prior to the ---/ / N. Pt~llc Mllrtterllll~ AISll 1. A separate sm m Cenmcape am iffigatfon I~ns per Englneermg Fhjl:ic Works StancWds ---/ / stroll M mJl~t~ittl~l to the City Engineer for review ~ Ippmvll I)dor to ~nll mlp Ippmval or ism of INik:ling permill, whichever OClNrl flint. The folowlng Ilrllcl)e plmways, meclians, plseos. easements, Iraill, or otter Ireas are requirlO Io pe InnexecI tnlo the Lanctscl~ Mainlea Disffia: " · /2. AsignedconsenllnclwNverfoffntojoinanQorfm'mthel}PmWiltel.lm:llclPemxlUghting / / Omrtcl~sl~lllN file0with theCity Engineer IXlorlofinllrnaDll:}l}mvllor islul~meofl}uilcling permits wNc:l~ver occurs tim. Formation msm slWl Im Imme ~ Im clevelolaf. 3. AIIrequireCllCmMcllnclcl}ingl~lin~llln~ Mblcmfnuexiiymlinllineclbythe -.--/ / devempef unto accefXN by me CIty. 4. ParkwlylancllcaDingonmlollowi~llreet(m)lfmlconloemlol~mlulloll~rlmTmclive --/ / O. Drainage 8mt Flocxl Comfol ~. Thepmlecl(orllsmlone~islommdwCtlVnaFIomlHazamZoes:~lsrelom, llocxl / / prmmmonmsmmsemlmlxoviaWMcsftmecl~areOmemclC~EnOmeor am : 2. ItsMs~meclevetmersmsmmlmymMvemcuffemFlmaZom -' ,' c~es~naSonmmvec~h~mmemama. neceu~memm. mam. arm w~,-~,~,,~'-,~-.,Jc ca, cmm~ of MID Revilk~(Ct.OMR) lelllle(NXlnllflIN~ iuuanceoflNilQng~,~m~.A M ~ by FEMA IXior I0 ~ or i111NOvor11Ifl IZllllnOI. ~ NCuts first __ 3. Afinll drlinlge IIIXly 11111 bl luDINIte(I fo ~ II~~N~ Engineer I]l'k~rfo tina~ map alZ~ava~ or me msuance of I~uMing I~. wnm occur~ ~m. M clrainage facilities sl~al be inslalle¢l as reclgireO Dy the Gity Engineer. . 5C-21gl !|ol't] 4. A petit f~ t~e COu~ F~ Co~trol Distr~ i$ f~uifed for wo~ wR~i~ ds f~t-of-way, / , , 5. Trees are ;hib~ wR~in 5 feet of the outs~e dia~ter of any puDl~ sto~ drain pi~ meuur~ from the outer ~e of a mature tree tmnk. / / 5. Public sto~ ~in easemems snail N grad~ to ~ey ove~s in t~ evem of a / / b~age in ~ su~ ~tch Msin on the ~Ol~ street. P. Utilities / 1. Pmv~e separate utili~ se~es to each M~I im~ ~el~ swera~ symem, wmer, / / gas, e~m ~wer, te~p~M, aM MN ~ (NI uMe~M) in a~m~ wen the Util~ StaMa~. E~emms shall M pmv~ M r~ir~. I/ 2. ~e ~eve~r sMII N res~nsi~ for tM ~n ~ exm~ m~s u ~m~. J / 3. Waer ~ seer ma sM~ M ~s;nN ~ renege ~ ~ ~ ~ms of tN ~ / CuMm~ ~ WBer O~ (CCWD), ~ ~ F~ ~t~n a~ tN En~mnmmal Heaeh D~am ~ tN ~ ~ ~ ~~. A ~er ~ ~ime from tN CC~ i r~i~ ~r to INI ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~s, whCM~r ~q f~. Q. Generel Requlrement~ and ApprovNe 1. The separate parcels contained within the ixoject 13ourxades Ihll be leglily corni31ned into --/ / one parcel prior to issuance of building penMs. / / 2; An easement for a joint use driveway s/sail Ix Wovidl:l Ixtor to finll map II or / / among the newly Create lameit. 4. EtiwandWStn Sevtine Area I=4gionll Minltt, ~ Regional, and Mar Ptan / / DrmnmgeFmN'~lll)lli}iclli~m'tOflnlmlli~orpdorlolNilnglMff~illulnce if S. PefffdtsshaltleoIMajnedfmmthelolowtnOaOlncMltm'wekwleWltlleirdON-el-wlY: / / 6. Asignm:lc~llnllndwlNltlemt)NnlnW~temNLIw~~Nty / /-- Facilillel i IMI lie flld wlh the Cly Englnem'Wlt l} Ikl mill II}lielwll m'the 7. Priortofintlzltionollnydlvttolxsqtnlm, tulfeWslimlxovtmm~l:zllntMlxcom- / · e sltiflctjon of tl~Cly F. Jlgint~. I='MII ~ tl'Stl aXVlllO~tO tot Inlet II'town on me tentative map. SC-2/gl 12or12 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 15247, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FOR 13 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 1.4 ACHES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-474-05. A. Recitals. (i) Mr. Royce Shibata has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 15247 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On March 25, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached heret~ and incorporated herein by this reference. D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 2 Plannina Division 1) To mitigate significant adverse noise impacts from 19th Street traffic, the applicant shall construct 5-foot sound attenuation barriers on the south side of the patios and 4-foot sound attenuation barriers on the south side of the balconies of the two units adjacent to 19th Street. The final barrier designs shall be approved by the City Planner. 2) Precise elevations for the duplex buildings shall be submitted as part of the construction plan check documents for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of any building permits. 3) All visitor parking shall be clearly delineated through proper signage per Section 17.08,040-K of the Development Code. 4) Each dwelling unit shall be provided with a minimum of 125 cubic feet of lockable exterior storage space, per Section 17.08,040-R of the Development Code. 5) Each unit shall be provided with hookups for a clothes washing machine and dryer per, Section 17.08,040-R of the Development Code. 6) Tree Removal Permit No. 91-29 is hereby approved subject to the following mitigation measures: a) Trees No. 6-10, 13, 16, 22, and 24 are not heritage trees and shall be removed. b) Trees No. 1, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 21 shall be removed and replaced with the largest nursery-grown stock available to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to occupancy. c) Trees No. 4, 5, 12, 17, and 19 shall be preserved by transplanting elsewhere on-site to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to occupancy. One-year after transplanting the trees, the applicant shall submit a written report to the City Planner from a qualified arborlet evaluating the health and condition of the trees and making D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 3 recommendations for their care or replacement. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any trees as recommended by the arborlet within 90 days of said report, in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section .19.08,100. The applicant shall submit documentation of the right-of- entry to perform said work to the satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to final map recordation. d) Trees No. 2, 3, and 23, which are located off-site, shall be protected during construction activity as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08.110. e) All trees required to be preserved shall be protected as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08,110. Construction barriers shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. f) All trees required to be preserved shall be properly maintained in accordance with the arborist's recommendations, including watering and pruning, until final occupancy release. g) Approval of this Tree Removal Permit No. 91-03 shall be valid for a period of 90 days, subject to extension. The 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or grading permits, whichever comes first. h) The Planning Division (and, if applicable, Engineering Division) shall be contacted within 30 days of the planting of the trees to conduct an inspection. i) A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division which calls out the number, size, and location of the heritage trees which are to be preserved, as well as replacement trees. Such plans must be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 15247 - SHIBATA March 25, 1992 Page 4 Enqineerinq Division 1) An in-lieu fee, as contribution for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of 19th Street, shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2) Construct a storm drain and catch basin within 19th Street from approximately 100 feet west of the west project boundary to meet the existing storm drain pipe located approximately 100 feet east of the east project boundary in accordance with the City plan for the storm drain.' 3) The developer shall reimburse the City for street improvements adjacent to the project if the City project to improve 19th Street is underway prior to approval of the final map. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS VI PROJECT": '?"'f~,F/~,YF_, T'~,~::r /~"'Z-4"'7 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: ~yct~ ~'ffl l~kr lt LOCATION: / Those items che~ am ~~ of ~vl. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 98~-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme Limitl Coxable,on ~t,- y" 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, ~ building permits are / / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be appmved prior to i / / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / / 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consurnrnate or cause to be commenced / / participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos ComnIjnity Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District to finance cor, mmcUon and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the developmerit. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts property upon conq31etion. The equipment shal be selected by the Distdct in accordance with its needs. 'In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulafi~8. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. v'/5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building pemlts, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the estJcdishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District Ior the construction and maintenance. of necessary school facilities. However, ff any SGhool district has previously estal~lisllecl such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shaM,, in the alternative, consent to the taxation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building panTIM, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Cornrnunity Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 219 1 1 of 12 p -- This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school irrOacts as a result of this project. ~//6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved. written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. SIte Development V'//1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and --" Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefadlityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUnitormBuilding'Codeand / / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. / 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 5. All site. grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.), or pdor to final map appoval in the case of a custom lit sulxlivislin, or approved use has commenced. whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code. all other al:~icable C. Jty Ordinances. and N:q)icable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. / 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shah be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. z,-.-' 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / with all receptacles shielded from pu~li view. / 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meat City standards. The final design, locations, / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to C~/Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. L//' 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc., Shall /"'/- be licated out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC -2/91 2oir12 .~"37 11. Street na~s shall ~ subm~ for C~y Planner review a~ approval in a~rda~e w~h / / the a~ ~met Nami~ Pol~y pr~r to ~mval of the final m~. ¢ 12. All ~i~i~ num~rs a~ i~iv~ual un~s shall ~ ~entffi~ in a clear a~ ~ncise manner, / / i~ludi~ pm~r illuminat~n. 13. A detailed plan indicati~ trail w~ths, taxiram s~pes, phys~al ~bns, fendS, a~ / / we~ ~mml, in a~rda~e w~h Ci~ Master Trail drawings, shall ~ ~bmi~ for C~y Planner review a~ a~mval p~rto ~pmval a~ re~ffiation of the Final Tra~ Map a~ pr~r to ~mval of street improvemere a~ gradi~ plans. Deve~r shall u~rade a~ all trails, i~luding fe~ing and dmina~ dev~es, in ~n~n w~h street improvements. 14. The ~venants, ~ns a~ Restd~ns (CC&Rs) s~ll ~l ~ohib~ the keepi~ of equine J / animls where zoning r~uimmems for the kee~ ot ~ animls have been met. I~ividual ~t ownera in su~is~ns shall have the o~bn ol keepi~ sa~ animals w~ the n~essity of appealing to ~affis of dir~ors or ~m~wne~' as~iatbns for a~nd~ms to the CC&Rs. /15. ~e Covenams, ~nd~ions, a~ Remains (CC&Rs) a~ Adides of In~ration of the / / Hom~wnem' ~iat~n are subj~ to the ~oval ol t~ Planni~ a~ E~ineeri~ D~is~ns and the C~y A~omey. They shall ~ r~ ~n~ffemly w~h the Final M~ or p~r to the issua~e of ~i~i~ ~s, whoever ~m timt. A r~ ~py shall prov~ed to the CiW Engineer. / 16. ~1 pa~ays, o~n areas, a~ land~pi~ s~ll ~ ~a~m~ mimain~ by the prope~ / / owner, homow~m' as~im~n, or ot~r ma~ a~pt~ to t~ C~. Pint ot this land~ maimena~e shall ~ mmi~ for C~ Plan~r a~ C~ E~i~er review ~oval p~r to issuan~ of bui~i~ ~Rs. / 17. ~lar ross easerams shall ~ ~t~ for t~ ~ of a~uming thin each lot or / / ~elli~ unit shall have the ~ to r~e ~nl~N ~m~ ~m ~ts or un~s for use of a ~lar ene~ system. ~e easerams may ~ ~mai~d in a ~rm~n of Restd~ns for the su~ivis~n wh~h shall ~ m~ ~ffem~ w~ ~ r~t~n ol the final m~ or issuame of ~s, whicmer ~ms tim. ~ ea~mems ~all mh~ the ~ming of sha~s by v~tm~n, st~ures, l~ures or aft omr ~, ex~ for mil~ wires similar ~s, ~muam to ~vemnt ~ S~n 17.~.0~2. 18. The pmj~ ~mai~ a ~s~ Histo~l U~m~. ~ sNe s~l maintained in a~a~ w~h t~ Himo~ La~m~ ARem~n Pe~ . Any fu~her md~~ to t~ s~e i~i~, ~ ~ lim~ to, e~e~r aRerm~ns a~or ime~r a~eratio~ ~h ~e~ t~ e~e~r of t~ ~i~i~ or ~ur~, mmval ol ~ma~ trees, deml~n, re~n, r~n~m~n ot ~i~i~ or ~m~res, or c~es to the s~e shall r~uim a ~ff~n to t~ Histo~ ~m~ ~er~n Pe~ ~bj~ to Historic Prese~n Co~iss~n rev~ a~ ~val. C. Bull~lng ~ign ~ 1, An a~matWe e~y system is r~imd to ~v~ ~m~ ~t water tot all ~elli~ un~s / /.-- a~ lor ~ati~ a~ ~im~ ~1 or ~, un~ss ot~r a~e~e e~ symems are demn~rmed to ~ ol ~iva~m ~c~ a~ e~j~. ~1 ~im~ ~ i~al~ at the time ol in~ial deve~em s~ll ~ ~~nl~ w~ ~r heati~. ~t~ls s~ll i~d~ in t~ ~i~i~ ~a~ a~ shall ~ subm~ for CRy Ranner rev~ a~ ~roval p~r to the issua~e of ~i~ing ~s. ~ 2. All ~elli~s shall have the front, s~e a~ rear e~vat~n$ u~ra~ w~h archit~tural / treatmere, detaili~ a~ i~reas~ delineat~n ol sudace treatmere su~ to C~ Planner review a~ a~mval pdor to issua~ of ~i~i~ ~s. / 3. Sta~affi path ~ver plans for use by t~ ~m~wnem' ~iat~n shall be subm~ for / / C~ Plan~r a~ Bui~i~ ~ial review a~ ~oval p~r to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~Rs. ~ 4. All mf ~udena~es, indudi~ air ~R~nem a~ other r~f mum~ ~uipmnt a~or / / pmje~ns, shall ~ shie~ from vi~ a~ the s~nd ~er~ from adjacent pm~dies a~ . streets as r~uir~ by the P~ni~ Divis~n. Such ~reening shall ~ amh~urally im~rm~ w~h the ~i~i~ des~n a~ m~~ to the sati~a~bn of the C~ Planner. Details shall ~ indud~ in ~ildi~ ~ans. D. Paffilng a~ Veh~ulr Ac~ (Indite dellIs on bulMing plans) ~ 1. All ~mi~ ~t la~ isla~s shall ~ve a miniram ~s~e dimens~n of 6 feet a~ shall . / /__ ~main a 12-i~h wak adja~m to t~ pa~i~ sill (im~i~ ~). ~ 2. Te~ur~ ~m~n pm~ays a~ te~r~ ~vemm ~mss cir~n ais~s shall ~ / / pmv~d thmug~ t~ deve~em to ~n~ ~elli~un~i~i~ w~h ~n s~e~ plua~r~reat~nal uses. ~ 3. All ~i~ ~a~s s~ll ~ ~ble st~ ~r C~ ~a~s a~ all d~ay males, / / emm~es, a~ ex~s s~ll ~ m~ ~r C~ maCaWs. / 47 All un~s shall ~ pmv~ed w~h garage ~r ~m ff d~ays are IB t~n 18 feet in / / .de~h from ~ of s~alk. ~ 5. ~e Cove~ms, ~it~ a~ Rem~m s~ll mm~ ~e stora~ of ~mm~nal veh~les / /- on th~ s~e unless t~y am t~ ~1 ~ o~ t~n~m~n for m o~r a~ pmhib~ pami~ on inte~r cirm~bn aisles otNr than in deS~Mt~ ~Hor H~i~ am.. / 6. Ram for any s~r~ ~tes s~ll N mt~ for tN C~ Pinner, CiW E~i~er, a~ / / , Ra~ C~m~ Fire Paten D~ mvlw am ;vN ~r to ima~ of ~i~i~ ~s. E. Undoping (f~ pelic~ mlmll i~ 8~, mlr to tm N.) ~1. A ~tai~ lama aM ~tln ~an, i~ s~ ~ ~ ml ~m i~ / /-- i~ in tN Mse of mslmll devemm, s~l N me ~ a I~n~ I~ amhe~ aM ~biM for C~ Ra~r ~ ~ ~81 ~to tM/a~ ~ ~i~i~ ~Hs or par fi~ ~ ~vN in tN m ~ a ~tm ~ ~n. / 2. Ex~i~tm~~toNm~p~s~N~~ha~m~n~mer / /.-- 3.Amini~m~ ~ ~ tr~rgmss~m,~~offfiefo~s~es, s~M~pmvid~ / w~hin tM ~j~: % - ~- i~h ~x or lair, ~ O % - 3& i~ ~x or i~er, 4. A ~nimm of ~ 0 % of tres ~am~ w~hin the m~ ~all M ~n s~e trees - / 24-i~ ~x or / 5. ~thin B~i~ ~ts, trees sMII N ~ame m a rme of one 15~1~n Ire for eve~ three / /_ pami~ stalls, sOff~im to ~a~ 5~/= of tM ~mi~ area m ~ir ~n on ~m 21. SC -2/91 4oir12 Z~)'3(~ Pr~,~ .','o.: Ti' t~7--~-'~ r..o~p~cuo. 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree par 30 linear feet of building. / / 7. All private slopa banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgmater slopa. but less than / / 2:1 slopa, shall be. at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. SIopa planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developar prior to occupancy. 8. AII private slopas in excess of S feet, but less than 8 feet inverticalheightandof2:lorgreater / /-- slopa shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree par each 150 sq. ft. of slopa area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub par each 100 eq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slopa shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree par each 250 eq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope pine. SIopa planting required by this section shall include a parmanent irrigation system to be installed by the developar prior to 9. For single family residential development, all slopa planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developar until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactoW v'/ 10.. For multi-family residential and non-residential deveioprnent, proparty owners are respan- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying piam material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required par the Development Code and/or / / · This recluimrnem sl~ll be in addition to the required street trees and siopa planting. L"'/12. The final design of the parimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and aplxoval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. ,/"/13. Special landscape feature such as mounding, aIjvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified ~ng, is required along L-/' 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public righl-ol-way on / / the perimeter of lhls projecl area shall be continuously maimalned by the developer. V~ 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. ff located in public maintenance areas / / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. t/" 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and sul}mitted for City Planner review and / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria sl'mll encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. '/'/" 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to coneewe water through the principles of / / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucarnonga Municipal Code. SC-2/91 5o1'12 co.,d=.o.D.tc: F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of thisapproval. / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. L//2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developor shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. v'//3.' The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / / project in a standard format as determined by the CIty Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. ~/4. A final acoustical report shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of building permits. The final report shell discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conforrnance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H, Other Agenclu L""/1. EmergencysecondarymssshallbeprovldedinaccordancewithRanot~oCucamongaFire / / Protection District v/"2. Ernergencyaccessshellbeprovlded, rnaintenancelreeandclaar, a minimumof26feetwlde / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance ol building permits for combustible construction, evidence shell be / / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Rre Protection District that ternlxra~/water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of require fire protection system. v/" 4. The applicam shell contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / /__ location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead strutlure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mall boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be su~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5, For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all --" supportive information, shall be ol3tained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. sc -2/91 6of'12 APPLICANTS SHA~ CONTACT ~E BUILDING AND SAF~ DIVISION, ~14) ~1~, FOR COMPLIANCE M~ ~E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. S~e ~ve~em ~. ~e ~pl~m shell ~y w~h the Imest a~pt~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ C~, Unffo~ M~hani- / / cal C~e, Unffo~ Plumbi~ ~e, Nat~nal EI~ ~e, a~ all otMr a~i~e ~des, ordinames, a~ rqulat~ in eff~ m t~ Hm of ~a~ of relate ~ms. Please ~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~is~n for ~es of tN ~e ~n O~ina~e a~ ~l~able han~uts. /' 2. P~r to issuan~ ~ ~i~i~ ~ts for a nw resiNil ~elli~ une(s) or ~r a~R~n / / to eximi~ un~(s), ~ ~ ~all My ~e~m fes m tM em~im~ rote. ~ fees may i~l~e, b~ am ~t lim~ to: C~ ~tff~n Fe, Pare Fe, ~i~ Fee, Sy~em Deve~mm Fee, Pe~ a~ Pin C~i~ Fes, a~ ~1 Fes. 3. P~r to imame of ~i~i~ ~ for a ~ ~m~ or i~mdm Nvemm or / / a~n to an ex~i~ deve~p~m, t~ ~m s~ll ~ ~mm fes m t~ e~isNd rme. ~ch fees my i~e, ~ are ~t li~ m: Syme~ ~mm Fee, Dmin~ Fee, ~1 Fees, Pe~ aM Pin Ch~ Fes. /' 4. Street a~res.s s~l N pm~ by ~ ~i~i~ ~, ~ert~l ~ r~mm~n a~ ~r to imame of ~i~i~ ~. J. Exlmlng 1. Pmv~ m;lia~e w~h tN Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~ for ~e ~ li~ c~ara~es / / ~,~ use, ~ea, ~ ~i~e~ ~ ex~ ~i~ 2. ~i~ ~i~i~ s~ll ~ ~e to ~ w~h ~ff~ ~i~i~ ~ z~ r~u~ for / / t~ ime~ use or t~ ~i~ ~11 3. ~i~m~di~salfa~lR~ss~l~mmv~,f~a~or~to~y~ht~ J / Unff~ P~ 4. U~mu~ om~e ~ m to ~ ~ a~ m ~ ~i~ ~ ~~ for / / K. G~lng /1. Gradi~ of t~ ~ m s~l M ~ ~ wNh b U~ ~ ~, C~ / / Grai~ ~am. a~ ~~ ~ ~s. ~ f~l ~ ~ s~l ~ in ~. A ~ils r~ ~l 3. ~e ~ve~m Pete · r~e. Pim ~m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~~m ~ (714) ~7-2111 for ~ ~~n. ~m~ of ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ tN C~y ~r ~ tN mm of ~ ~ ~. 4, A ~~ r~ SMII tN tim of ~l~n ~r SC-2/91 70f12 p__~/~/,~_ 6. As a custon't-iot SUl:X:liviSK~n, The following requsrernents slqaH 0e met: a. Surety snail De Posted and an agreement executed guarameeing corr~tetion of all on-she ---/-- clrajnage facilities necessary lot 0ewatenng all parcels to trte satisfaclK}n of me Bu~kdir~ and Safety Division pnor to final mad aD0roval and pnor to trte ~ssuance of grading perrestS. o. Appropnate easements for safe disPosal of drainage water mat are conducted onto or over adjacent Darcets, are to N delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the BuddBng and Safety Division prior to is&uance of grlcling ancI tNilcling perrr~ts. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for clewatenng ancI protecting the sulxlivided ---/ proC}erhes, are to 13e installed Dnor to is81jIrtcl of I:xjilclirlg plrrriill for constnjction uPon any parcel mat may 13e sul:Hecl to drainage flowl entenng, le=ving, or within a parcel relatNe to which a I~Jiiding permit is reclueltecI. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to 134 sumfeted to the Buik2ing ancl SNery ---J Division for royal peior to ismjlnce of I:xjilcling Inci ~ pemfl. (Thai may Oe on an incremental or coml:}omte e. All slope IC~ankS in excess of 5 feet in vertic.m heigel ~ t~e sseclecl with nBive grasses / / or planted with ground cover for erosion control ul:}on conl}letiofi of gltcling or some other aRen'tHive rrstrtod of erosion control still N con~ecI to Ihe IliltlClion of the Bullcling Officill. In Icicleion a permanent irrigllion m/Item frill I}e peovtGect, Thai requirement does not release the apC}iicint/cleveloper from conq:ilnce with the slope planting recluirementl of Sectton 17.08.040 1 ol the Deveto~ Cocle. APImUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERNG OWlSION, (/14) Ill,111~, FOR COMPLIANCE wrrl,I THE FOLLOWING CONOITIONS: L Oecllcstlon 8ncl VeNcuIBr Access 1. Rigrll-of-way Inc:l eElera $hll tie cllclicllecl to the Cl~ for II inteflof ~ streets / / mr~/tmiis, pu01ic Hseos. pu04ic llracIl~m, str~trt4~,mclmJe4c~ fr, tties u showfi on the ~ mqcI/or tertilve f~D. Pmtl~ eMemenm for nofi..mjUic ancVor temltive mID. / 2. OeCliCllk~tl'kllll)tlllll~OINk)lN~ltgllllq~-WlyN~N I)ltlll~tN'ltrl~l / / (measure Imm ereel entetlne): tetl feet en IroNleNin 3. An iffevccIl}leotflrGIcleclicllicrlfor 4~olwii~ellefilMIIl~llC)lml~e for ill pnvltt liraell or clrlvel. v/ 4. v ' · : Non-vehicul,lr_r~coe shll N~ S. FIKiprOCll access emmems snas Ix pmvKle~l ensuq access to Ill I:lq:els tW CC&R s _._ or I~ cteects ancI sMtl be recorclecl c:oncurr~rmy wilh the ml} or W to me sssuance of l~j~ petrels, where no map I snv~ive~. -:-=,,, ,o,,= 6.Private drainage easements torcross4ot drainage snail I:>e Drovw:led and sinall Oe clenneate~ Or noted on the final maD. 7. The final mad shall clearh/delineate a 10-foot minimum I)uiiding restriction area on the /__/__ neighl)oring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: '//we heret~y dec/icate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga me ngnt to DrottiOit me construction of (residential) tJuiidit~$ (Or other slTucfurel) wrtt~in mose areas cles,gnate: On tt~e mad as t3ui~ing reStriCTiOn areas.' A maintenance agreement Shall also I:)e granted from each lot to the adjacent lot througr'~ the CC&R's. 8 Allexislingeasementslyingwilhinfuturerightl-of-wlysh/llbequitClllmedor delineateclon / / the final map. I/9. Easements for ¢xjbllc sidewaks and/or met tmel place(I outside the !Xdcdic right-of-way / / shad Ix de41cat~ to the City wherever they enmacn omo pdvme 10. Additional suet fight-of-way shall Ix dedlr,,aed along right turn lanes, to Ixovtde · minimum / / of 7 feet meamjrecl from the face of curbs. If cud} adlacm sidewak is used along the turn line, i plfIilel stret tree rnljntenlncl easement sham Ix Ixovtded, 11. The developer shill mlkt a good fljlh effort to li:Quirl the filMrid off-Ill phiparty interests _J · / the developer Shall, at lea 120 days Imor to sulmltat of the final map kx 8Wov·l, enter into an Igreement to cQnq~t the ~ purllint to Governnan· Colto Section 66462 atlucftUmelltheCityloQuifethemkitlfllarequifedkN'lhlkiq)fwements. to ao:luim the off-de ¢xol)efty in··tell required ki cormaction with the adxlvislon. Security ford lint·ion ol thai· corn snall t)l in the loffn ol icll/t depod kith· Imounl glven in an I:~enappmvedtWtheCityWto4:ommen=lfi'4floiNalll]faillL M. ~tmel mmlmmvmmmfem ~. Ammxmac~mpmvemmmm~mmm,wmmm. dmmmemmmcmm.~vmmm. pmmeom. / mmndmcmp~mmmm, mc.)mmmmmontmpWmmnd~tmemmmvemmhmmim Cmy Stmm~mmm. mntmmot mmm mm~mam~m mmm mmmmm, mmm mm mmmmmmm to,~m and gunre,. AC lave·ram. dine m;mpmmchmm. midmwmlm. mmm Mrmm, mm mmm tmem. 2. ArrvrVmumot21, toolwk:lelXvemeftwlNnm404omwkadedlcledftQII,41-waYsmta __J / k,'''/3. ConmmctmmmoemmlnOpedimmmmmfNtmvemmmm~tmmnmlmam~to: / / NOteS: (a) Me0ian island includes landscapirx3 and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reCOnStruClmOn and overlays wdl De 0etermtned dunng plan check. (c) If so maine0. walk shall I)e curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so rrtarkKI. an m-lieu of construction tee snail I:}e provideel for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lagtel, prep,lre<l I:W a rm}is: / / .. terecl Civil Engineer. shall be sulxnittecl to and aCOmvl<l I:)y the City Engineer. Secunty sl'klll I:)e IDOSteCl and an agreement execute. to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteetrig conq)lelion of the DUlDliC Ir,:V0r p~vlle street iraDrove- merits, prior to final map approval or the ismjanrA of INildtng permits, wt~ichever oCCurs first. b. Prior to Iny' work being performed in pul3ic rlgll*Of-wly, feel ~ IDe pek:l ~ a ._.J 1 conmmclion permit arkIll I:)e ol:Xlinecl from the City Engineers Oilice In edcllllon to any other peffndl required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street nlme itgnlng, Ind Irlemorme~ condut ._./ 1 snail Ix inslNled to the sailaction of the City Engineer. cl. Signllconduilwithpulll:loxelshllll:lei~ltiledonlnyrlewconImctionor~ion ,.J----/ of major, secgmclary or {:elector tareels whim intersect with other rnNor, secondary or ooeeclor suees for future traffic signale. Pul bexes Shall be placed on beth sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECRorlnyolneflgr,,llenl~l:}ytheCltyEngineer. NiXeS: ----/ /-- ( 1 ) All pus bexeS real be No. 6 unleas mheedse speclied ~ the CA,/Enginee. (2) Conme shal be 3-iem galvanized sWel web pukepe. e. When cnajr rarqx shal be irstNled on 81 Imar em'ne~ et irlmseclim~ per CRy7 / Stanerm or as clrecte~ tW the Ce/Engineer. acle~Natedeteumextngcerelnal~e. Aslmelceeumpeemllme/be required. Acash reNnOM ugaon~el I~e eofllfuglk~lo Ire ~el Ire ely Engineer. rwvWw arW alXlmvl tWlht Cly Engineer. Prlm'lo lny ,eNkMmlpedNmMenlN Pfi- J,/' 6. Street trees. a minirru m et 1~ size e' Linger. ~ Ix ineNle per ely Stanclams ,n _ _ _ac~__rclance with m City's street tree program. _ .,- ;_,-_-;-.~.- :,_- L,,/~. Intersection line of site cles~ns snail I~e rewewed t~y me City Eng:neer for conformance adopted Dolicy. /-- a. On collector or ~rger streetS, lines of sigl'~ shall N plotted for all project intersections, /"/- including clnveways. Walls, shins. and siol>es snail 13e located outs~e the lines of s~ght. Landscaping and other oOstnJctK)ns w~thm me lines of s,Jnt snail N a,oOroved oy me CRy Engineer. I:}. LocJI residential street intersections shall have their ncticeal:)ility improved, usually t~y / / mov,ng me 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. l/~8. ~necl from CALTRANS for any work within the following rigN-of-way: ./ / 9. All IxJIMic irnDmvementl on the following streetl Shill tie opefltionllly cornlMete prior to the ---/ / issuance of I:~jilcling permits: N. Pt~llc Maintenance Ames 1. A sapirate set of !lncllcapl and irrigetfon piln$ pit Engirleedng Pul}lic Works Stll'tcllrcls ---/ / srklll 134 suOrnifiecl to the City Engineer for review ~ II:C4ovll I:fffor to firIll ntO II}lxoval or issulncl of liuilcling permill, wfitJ~ver occurs litIt. The IoloMng ~ pBkways, meclians, paseos, easements, trails, or other area ire mquimcl to Ix annexecl into the Lanclscape M~inlerlnce Dlsmcl: · ~2. Asigneclconsenlanclwajverformtoiolnancl/orfom;~thealcim0~te~m:ll..~htir~ ---/ / Omrim ifWl lx filecl wilh the ely En~in~r I:x~tofinal mi lmlxovior tlluance ot l3uilclir~ perm~swhicneveroccumfim. FomwioncomshMImlmme~thecmvelelw. 3. Alrlcluirlcllxjl:iCllnclclW~lnClin~lli0~m/llm mNO01111uOuIlymllnlit~tiythe --J / devefopef unUI ICCIfXICl IW t~e Cily. I/4: Pamwaylanclcapi~ontheki:wltslreel(s)shM~moemlomeresulsoltheresPective / / sc · 2/gl t t o( |3 j~)--/_./~) ~ 4. A permit from me County Flood Control Dismc{ is requsrea for work wdnin ~s rsgnT-ol-way , 5. Trees are i:H'ohib~ted witl~in 5 feet of trqe outside diameter of any public StOrm Clraln p~pe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. / / 6. Public storm drain easements snarl be graded to convey overflows in the event of a / Dlo<:xage in a sump catch hasart on the I:xjblic street. P. Utilities //"/1. Prov K;le separate utili~/serwces to each I:klrcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, _._/ / gas, eleclnc power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accoraarrJ w~th the Utility Standards. Easements shall 1:4 provided Is required. l/ 2. The develolDer sl'~all IX risponsil~ie for the relocation of existing utilities Is necessary. / / 3. Water and sewer plans shall Ix designed and conslructeCI IO meet the requirements ot the / / Cucamon~l County Water District (CCWD), Rlncho Cucamongl Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Hesitl~ Department of the Courtly of San 8ernarcltno. A letter of comDllance from me CCVVD is recIuirsd Ixlor to finll mID 11:)13mvll or illulnce of pertnits, whichever occurs first. G. Genera| Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the Ixojlct bolJnclldlS Ihlll be leglily colTCined into / / ' ' one parcel I:mor to issuance of I:xjitding permits. ° , , · F/" :; An easement for a joint use driveway shall be I:wvkled IXtor ~ final .map ai or _./ . / esfimmed coS o~ aCq:m~ioning the assessments under Amessmear I:)lwtct among the newly created parcels. 4. Stiwm'mSl/Sin Sevline Aria Reglonll Mljllnl, Secxlrdly neglonll, IncI Mar Ptln ..--J / Drainage Fees ~ I)l llaicl lxkx to finll mlD mvll or lxtor to l3uikll~l:lermt ismjance if no rnal} is inmlvedo .5. Perrn~shailbeNXlinedfmmUlet01oeeglgencMIIorwmkwlhillNtrdgN-oi-way: / /-- 6. A signl(I cs3ella llld wlkw Ioffn to Joln lfldi~loem tlte LIw~C4fivmnlty Faalit~s ~ ehal be filed wlm the r. Jty ln0inst Wte finel OevekSat. 7. Pnorto~nlizltjonof anydlvek)pTe~ptelt, lufiictent~pllNItlltlecom- the satWaction of the Cly EnOineef. Phase I}oundadm a ~ Io lot Ines smmn on me alN~weel tentalive map. ~: - 2/gi 12 oC 12 P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES - A request to modify a previously approved tract map consisting of 13 zero lot line homes and 114 condominium units in order to change the concept of land ownership to create a total of 139 lots, located on 11.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive - APN: 227- 151-15. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14407 was approved on December 12, 1990 and is located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive. A single family subdivis'ion exists south of the project site, and the property to the west is planned for multi-family development. Tentative Tract 14407 consists of 114 townhouse units and 13 zero lot line single family homes which serve to buffer the townhomes from the center plotted single family homes to the south- ANALYS I S: A. General: The applicant is proposing to change the project from condominiums, where only the unit ' s air space is owned, to townhomes, in which the land beneath the unit and its private open space is owned by its resident, in addition to a shared ownership of the common open space and recreational amenities. In order to process such a change, a modification to the Tract Map is necessary to create the individual "postage stamp" lots. No other changes will be made to the original approval. The original staff report for Tentative Tract 14407 is attached for your reference. The project is exempt from the new multi-family development standards because it was previously approved. B. Zero Lot line Homes: It should be noted that the applicant is currently processing a new Design Review application for the lots located on the south side of Street "A" (Tract 14407-1). The new floor plans are generally smaller than those originally approved. The new Design Review application will be reviewed separately by the Planning Commission at a later date. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES March 25, 1992 Page 2 C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the proposed modification on February 5, 1992, and recommended approval subject to the original conditions of approval for the Tentative Tract. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Planned Community, Development Code, and City Standards. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Modification to Tentative Tract 14407 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Modified Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "B" - Staff Reported Dated December 12, 1990 Exhibit "C" - Resolution No. 90-158 Exhibit "D" - Resolution No. 90-159 Resolution of Approval 1,01 ) =z ~... o ~._ " ;::"'; <1.,--, ""' f,.,,/~ i]i' ! ,,.,,, ,-,,,- ~ ...... I-- ~=-" Z . / k ,.' ..............~ .... ,t ~, ! .," ..~ '~"';. ,,, ~ , . ~ :i'> .~..:.,..."'~:~:'~:,~-} ':. i~.~,.:!~:'.~ .'!~: :~,-:' ::;.:.-:~ ZT~M: mc,~{. +o T~ 1+4-o '/ CITY OF ~CHO..'.:CUCAMONGA TrrLE:/1~:t:.'~/'l'r,,~{' ~ PLANM'NG-DMSION ' EXHIBIT: A ' ~ SCALE: -"" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .;-~Z === STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1990 , TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES - A residential .subdivision and design review of 114 townhouse units and 13 single family lots on 11.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive - APN: 227-151-15. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Subdivision Map, detailed Site Plan Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, and issuance of'a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 11.0 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Future Single Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 Dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Community. South - Single Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential {4-8 dwelling units per acre} within the Terra Vista P1 anned Community. East - Vacant; Low-Medium Residential {4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Con~nunity. West - Vacant; Medium-High Residential {8-14.dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential {4-8 dwelling units per acre ), North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre ) o South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre ), East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre ). West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre ). PLANNING COMMISSIO"'TAFF REPORT TT 14407 - LEWIS Hb,~S DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and void of any significant land forms or vegetation. Adjacent streets {Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive) have been constructed with curb and gutter. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed tract is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan. It consists of 114 townhouse units (in 2 and 4 unit buildings} and 13 zero-lot line, single family homes. The two housing types are separated by a local street which will connect to the recently completed Tract 13304, to the south. The townhouse units range in size from 1,246 to 1,484 square feet. The zero-lot line homes vary in size from 2,002 to 2,467 square feet on lots which average 4,060 square feet. Typical dimensions for the single family lots are 40 x 100 feet. Minimum setbacks are a 10 foot building separation in the side yards, a 15 foot rear yard, and 18 feet {to the property line) .in the front yard. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee last reviewed the project on October 4, 1990. At that time, the Committee {McNiel, Melcher, Coleman} recommended approval of the project subject to"the incorporation of the following comments into the conditions of approval: Zero-Lot Line Homes: 1. The rear elevation of Plan 260 needs additional features to add interest to the otherwise flat facade created by the large gable roof. Some suggestions included changing · the roof design, adding mullions to the windows, additional shutters, and revising the type and location of the windows. Revised plans will be reviewed by the Design Review Commi tree pri or to bui 1 di ng permit issuance. (See Exhibit "G-7".) 2. Additional windows should be added to the zero;lot line elevations of the unit on Lot I because that unit is center plotted. Townhouse Archi tecture: 1. The side elevation of Plan 176 has a large gable end which should be redesigned to add some interest to the PLANNING'COMMISSIOF 'TAFF REPORT TT 14407 - LEWIS Hb,,cS DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 3 fl at facade. This el evati on i s very prominent when viewed from Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive. It was suggested that a design similar to the side elevation of Plan 175 should be used in half of the side-on cases along the perimeter streets. (See Exhibit "F-3".) 2. The Committee approved the applicant's deletion of the accent color subject to the use of the three stucco and trim combinations which were submitted. Site Plan: 1. Special paving should be used to connect pedestri an routes across the main drive loop. The paving treatment at the project entry should continue to the north side of the loop road {including the parking spaces). It was clarified that the alleys and parking courts would be constructed of integrally colored, scored concrete, while the pedestrian connections and project entries would be constructed of interlocking pavers. (See Exhibit "D".) 2. There shou1 d be a greater separati on between the buildings and the perimeter walls along Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive. 3. The wall at the southwest corner of the tract should be pulled' back from Lot 25 of Tract 13304 to allow for a more open view from that home and to improve the streetscape. 4. The connection of the Mountain View perimeter wall and the wall along "A" Street should be carefully designed due to the visibility of the wall corner. The applicant will submit an elevation of the connection for staff review. {See Exhibit "H-4'.} C. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Committees recommended approval of the project as conditioned by the Resolutions of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part I I of the Environmental Checklist and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and the General Plan. The project.will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause si gni ficant PLANNING COMMISSIOF TAFF REPORT TT 14407 - LEWIS DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 4 environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Planned Community, the Development Code, and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this project through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. , BB :SR :ml g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibi't "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E' - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Townhouse Elevations Exhibit "G" - Zero-Lot Line Elevation~ Exhi bit "H" - Streetscape Elevations Resol uti on of Approval for TT 14407 with Condi tions Resolution of Approval for DR for TT 14407 '""""" ~ Ill. 38111 TIACI Ill,. 144411 10 J.V.LN .I; ' fl, ! !in~ :" . r- i ~ , ,, t !' tZe, me I~s mm~es · .! 1 ~t.i,,~e~~ ~ow.t,t. 'ON .LOYNJ. a~u. Lvuwa., v,,uorv~'~ ,,. YISIA Yklkl~l. I . seT-I, NOU. YAFt! Dg .:ll'lVV I !lg-I. NOI.,I, VA]"I! , I ! ~ '~;': ,.. ~S LOtt~. 'ON LO'VI~. BALLVJ.14..' . I~ ve4uoanv . V.LSIA VUI:ITM J oil-1 INOI.LVA~iqI i I · i! · ,. 4; '- · I I k ~14M0 V ..... VJ.~IA Viiiill I ~.. W I' ' ' · E- P-A,,,e,F'H-~' RESOLUTION NO. 9~-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14407, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-15. A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes of California has filed. an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14407 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 12th day of December 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on December 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with publ i c testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: {a ) The appl i cati on appl i es to property 1 ocated at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive with a lot depth of 750 feet and a lot width of 700 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north 'of the subject site is future single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of single family. residential homes, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a} That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and E-31 PLANNING COMMISSION OLUTION NO. 90-!58 TT 14407 - LEWIS HOME~ DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Terra Vista Community P1 an; and (c} The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife · or their habitat; and {el The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and {f) The design of _the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Decl arati on. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the applicable SChool District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Faciltties District, the applicant shal 1, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the Final Map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the Final Map or issuance of building permits 'for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-158 TT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 3 2. A sidewalk and landscaped parkway to the East Greenway corridor and to Milliken along Base Line shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits, and these improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy of Tract 14407. Engineering Division: 1. Construct the following portions of streets to full width, including street lights, except for the off-site parkway improvements which may be deferred until development of the adjacent property: a. Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to Mountain View Drive. Landscaping along Base Line Road shall conform to the Base Line Road Master Plan; and b. Mountain View Drive from Terra Vista Parkway east to Base Line Road; and c. Terra Vista Parkway East from Mill iken Avenue to Mountain View Drive; and d. Milliken Avenue from Base Line Road to Terra Vista Parkway East. 2. Construct the portion of the Master Plan storm drain lines from the project to Deer Creek Channel. 3. An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead util i ties (telephone and el ectri cal, except 66KV) on the opposite side of Base Line Road shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Mountain View Drive to the westerly property boundary. 4. The developer shall submit two final maps to separate the single family development from the condominium development. 5. The Final Map for the single family family lots shall clearly delineate a 10 foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lots adjoining the zero-lot line wall and contain the following language: "I/we hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-158 TT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 4 6. A maintenance easement shal 1 be granted through the Covenants, Conditions, .and Restrictions to allow property owners to maintain the building wall located along the lot lines within the zero-lot line development. 7. Street trees shall conform to engineering standards and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 8. A separate landscape and irrigation plan, per City Standards, shall be provided subject to approval of the City Engineer for the side yard of Lot 1 as determined necessary during plan check. 9. Mountain View Drive shall be restriped from Terra Vista Parkway to Base Line Road to improve the sight distance at the intersections of "A" Street and Weston Place. A striping plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1990. B '~ '£arr. cNi~ · ATTEST: __ /B~, ~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced· passed· and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VAI. LETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 90-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14407 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-15. A. Recital s. (i) Lewis Homes of California has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14407 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On December 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on December 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or wel fare or material ly injurious to properties or improvements i n the vici ni ty. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-159 DR TRACT NO. 14407 - LEWIS HOMES DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 Planning Division: 1. Special paving treatment shal 1 be used to connect pedestrian routes across the main drive loop. The paving treatment at the project entry shall continue to the north side of the loop road (including the parking spaces). The al 1 eys and parking courts shal 1 be constructed of col ored, scored concrete, while the pedestrian connections and project entries shall utilize interlocking concrete pavers. 2. Landscape plans for all private yard areas on the north and east perimeter of the tract shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Landscaping shall include trees to mitigate the minimum building setbacks. 3. With the consent of the property owner, the wall at the southwest corner of the tract shall be pulled back from Lot 25 of Tract 13304 to allow for a more open view from that home and to improve the streetscape. 4. The design of the wall connection (between plexiglas and slumpstone} at the southeast corner of the site shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 5. Two trees shall be planted in each side yard of Lots 1 through 13, adjacent to the zero-lot line elevation. 6. The rear elevation of Plan 260 {zero-lot line unit) shall be revised to add interest to the otherwise flat facade created by the large gable roof. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to building permit issuance. 7. Additional windows shall be added to the zero-lot line elevation of the unit-on Lot 1. The revised elevation shal 1 be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to building permit issuance. 8. The Alternative Plan 176 side elevation shall be used in 50 percent of the cases where that elevation falls on an exterior or interior street. g. Front doors shall be covered by an extension of the eaves or another overhang, subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee. 10. The treatment of the windows on the right elevation of the zero lot, line units shall be revised to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-159 DR TRACT NO. 14407 - LEWIS HOMES DECEMBER 12, 1990 Page 3 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1990. ATTEST: .~ rry~n i~~tary Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -. RESOLUTION NO. 90-158A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14407, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT, (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-15. A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has filed an application for a modification to the approved Tentative Tract Map No. 14407 as described in the title of this Resolution. Nereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. ReSolution- NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial. evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25, 1992. including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows= (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive with a lot depth of 750 feet and a lot width of 700 feet and is presently vacant~ and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is future single family residential, the property to the south of the site consists of single family residential, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacant and planned for multi-family devel~pment~ (c) The proposed modification is for the purpose of creating underlying lots for townhomes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Z: -5'3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-158A TT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES March 25, 1992 Page 2 (a) The modified tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans~ and (b) The design or improvements of the modified tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans~ and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed~ and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat~ and (e) The modified tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems~ and (f) The design of the modified tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on December 12, 1990. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninu Division 1) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 14407, as contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 90-158 and 90-159, shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY= Larry T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-158A TT 14407 - LEWIS HOMES March 25, 1992 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby 'certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit= AYES= COMMISSIONERS: NOES= COMMISSIONERS= ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS: f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;'.--, STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - LA PARRY - A request to establish a silk flower and gift shop totaling 612 square feet within the historic Albert House, on 1.23 acres of land in the Low Residential District ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10323 19th Street - APN: 1076-151-02. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow ~ portion of the existing Henry Albert House to be utilized as a silk flower and gift shop. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing citrus grove; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residences (under construction); Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing single family residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family residences (under construction); Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The site currently contains the existing Albert House which was designated as an Historic Landmark on February 18, 1987. An existing circular driveway provides access to and from 19th Street. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, and a wall exist along the 19th Street frontage and were constructed as part of the City's 19th Street Improvement Project- The southern half of the lot remains vacant and contains no significant structures or vegetation. The Hamilton Street frontage currently has curb and gutter, bat no sidewalk. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 4 percent. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Flower/Gift Shop 6 12 1/250 2 2' Single Family Detached 3,100 2 car 2 2** Re si dence garage TOTAL 4 4 * Refer to Analysis Section B.2 ** Refer to Analysis Section B. 3 F. Applicable Regulations: Small scale, non-residential uses in historic structures may be conditionally permitted in any residential development district. ANALYS I S: A. General: The applicant is currently utilizing 612 square feet of the first story of the Albert House for a silk flower and gift boutique. The shop operates between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6 p.m., seven days a week. The boutique would be operated exclusively by the applicant, a lessee, who is in the process of purchasing the residence for living purposes. Residents and visitors can access the site from 19th Street via the existing circular driveway north of the residence- B. Issues: In reviewing the proposed Conditional Use Permit, there are several specific issues associated with this request, as follows: 1. Land Use Compatibility: The non-residential use of historic structures is encouraged by the City's Development Code as a means of preservation; provided the use does not disrupt the neighborhood. Residential development exists or is under construction on all property contiguous to the site in question. Currently, block walls exist along the east and west property lines, thereby buffering contiguous residences from the Albert House site- The proposed gift shop is secondary in nature to the residential use of the Albert House, due to the small size and the specialty nature of the use. Therefore, staff does not anticipate substantial vehicular traffic, noise, odors, or glare. 2. Parking: As a condition of using an historic structure, the Development Code requires the site and structure to be fully improved to include 'landscaping, parking, street improvements, etc- The proposed retail use requires 1 parking space for PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 3 every 250 square feet of area utilized for the retail use. With slightly over 600 square feet of the residence utilized for retail activity, only 2 additional parking spaces will be required. The site plan indicates that five vehicles can be parked in the circular driveway; however, staff is concerned that this may block the driveway. Therefore, a condition has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval to construct a two-space "parking area" adjacent to the circular drive to ensure that adequate parking and maneuvering area will be available on site. 3. Non-Conformities: The Development Code, Section 17.12,040.A.1 requires all new single family detached dwellings to incorporate a minimum of two parking spaces within a garage. Currently, the Albert House has a concrete pad, separate from the circular drive to accommodate the residents two cars. In order to alleviate this non-conformity while not causing an immediate financial burden on the new property owners, staff has included a condition within the attached Resolution of Approval to require construction of a two-car garage, closely emulating the architecture of the Albert House (as determined through a Landmark Alteration Permit), within five years of approval of this Conditional Use Permit. In addition, the condition, as written, requires the Planning Commission to review the application in five years to ensure compliance with the garage requirement. 4. Sight-Line Issues: The number of vehicles using the driveway will increase due to the Commercial enterprise. Therefore, to ensure the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk, a condition of approval has been included to improve visibility by replacing that portion of the block wall, not used for retaining purposes, with open fencing across the entire 19th Street frontage. The property to the east has open metal fencing across the entire frontage. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION: On March 5, 1992, the Historic Preservation CommiSSion reviewed the application and forwarded the request to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to modify and/or clarify the proposed conditions as follows: A. Planning Division 1. Condition No. 4: The two parking spaces shall be of an enriched material that is sensitive to the historic significance of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 4 B. Engineering Division 1. Condition No. 1: The tubular metal fence should be of a design and color that is not obtrusive and allows unobstructed viewing of the historic residence from 19th Street. 2. Condition No. 2: The Commission requested that staff explore the possibility of deferring construction of the Hamilton Street sidewalk to coincide with the same five-year period as the garage to assure the drive approach for the garage will be constructed in the correct location and/or will not have to be relocated on the Hamilton Street frontage. (The Commission felt that the residents only should take access from Hamilton Street, not visitors to the gift shop. ) The Commissions ' recommendations have been incorporated into the applicable conditions of approval with the exception of the recommendation for the deferral of the Hamilton Street sidewalk. City code requires the construction of public improvements along with the construction of buildings or parking lots. This intensified use requires parking spaces; therefore, the requirement for a sidewalk along Hamilton Street is triggered. Public improvements have been deferred on occasion, but only when it is impractical to construct them at present- That is not the case with this project- Hamilton Street is a school route and, therefore, a sidewalk on both sides is necessary for safety, although the north side is less critical than the south as there are other missing portions along the north side. FIRE DISTRICT COMMENTS: The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposed application and recon~nends that the use can take place within the Albert House subject to requirements for multi- purpose fire extinguishers and posting the shop "No Smoking." In addition, the District will conduct an inspection prior to occupancy to ensure compliance with the above referenced requirements as well as the requirements of the Historic Building Code- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: A. That the proposed project is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Development District in which the project is located; and B. That the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valle~ Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-08 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectf y submitt , r BB: SH/j fs AttaChments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "E" - Site Utilization Map Resolution of Approval 011 , ,~ J -:- -.,,,,, .-. ]F:2L 248 ':::::;:;::::::::; · · · ~13425 342~,' '-- ~~l~]~ " -, ' 1781 = · ~ ~ R B8-19 I I~ · '. ..... 13759" :.:.~ -.-.~. 12590~ c~ o~ ~~'~d:.-~uc~o a~m: ' ~'~s N A p~~.N~:d~SION ~: Lo~ ~f -- ~ = = ~ -., ........... ..: ~ E~ff: '~' SCALE: pLANNIN~:D'~SiON TITLE: ~;,4~ p]-,,~ N __-_, : ."': .............. L,.: a EXHIBIT: SCALE: / , · _, 0 2 4 PLANM'NCr 'DIVISION = House of Flowers I propose to utilize r~ ~.2 sq. ft. of the lower floor, as a botique to sell silk flowers arrangements and small gifts. Proposed hours of operation: 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM, Sunday - Saturday. Number of Employees:-O. Business will be operated by myself and my husband. Reasons for requesting CUP at this location. The Albert House, 10323 19th ST. is a Histroical Landmark in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. By operating this botique in the Albert House the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga will be able to experience some of the history of our city. F-/o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-08 FOR A SILK FLOWER AND GIFT SHOP TOTALING 612 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE HISTORIC ALBERT HOUSE, ON 1.23 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED IN AT 10323 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-151-02. A. Recitals. (i) Filomena LaParty has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-08 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 5th day of March 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the application. (iii) On the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10323 19th Street with a street frontage of 166 feet on 19th Street and a lot depth of 325.8 feet and is presently improved with the historic Henry Albert House; curb, gutter, sidewalk, and a wall exist along 19th Street; and curb and gutter exist along the Hamilton Street frontage; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a vacant citrus grove, the property to the south contains single family residences under construction, the property to the east includes single family residences, and the property to the west consists of single family residences under constructiDn; F -II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 2 (c) The Henry Albert House, in which the application is proposed, was designated as an Historic Landmark by the City Council on February 18, 1987; (d) The application contemplates the operation of a silk flower and gift shop utilizing the northerly 612 square feet of the first floor of the existing house; (e) The Development Code, Section 17.08,030.E7, permits small- scale, non-residential uses in historic residential structures subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit; (f) The applicant proposes to operate the business from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., seven days a week; and (g) No additional employees other than the property owners will be employed in the business. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planninc Division 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other City ordinances. 2) If operation of the facility causes any safety problems or adverse effects upon adjacent residences, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 3 3) The proposed use, and occupancy thereof, shall not commence until such time as all Uniform (or Historic, as applicable) Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Two parking spaces shall be constructed directly adjacent to the circular driveway to accommodate visitors to the shop. The design of the parking area shall conform to current code requirements while utilizing enriched materials that are sensitive to the historic significance of the site. The specific parking lot design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, and shall be constructed prior to utilizing the residence as a gift and flower shop. 5) In a five-year period from the date of Planning Commission approval, a two-car garage shall be constructed that emulates the architecture of the Albert House. The plans for the garage shall be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission prior to issuance of building permits for the garage. A Landmark Alteration permit shall be filed in conjunction with the garage addition. 6) This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission five years from the date of approval to ensure compliance with the condition of approval requiring the two-car garage. 7) Street trees, ground cover, and a permanent irrigation system shall be provided along 19th Street in accordance with the 19th Street Master Plan prior to commencement of use. Detailed landscape/irrigation plans depicting conformance with the master plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner and City Engineer prior to installation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 4 8) Any permanent sign(s) shall reflect the architectural character of the Albert House and shall be reviewed and approved by'the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Other temporary signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division per the guidelines established in the City's Comprehensive Sign Ordinance. 9) Hours of operation for the boutigue shall be limited to 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., seven days a week. Any request for expanded business hours shall require review and approval of the Planning Commission. Enqineerinq Division 1) The existing block wall along 19th Street shall be modified to improve visibility by replacing that portion of block wall not used for retaining purposes with tubular metal fencing not to exceed 4 feet in height as approved by the City Engineer and City Planner. The fencing shall be of a design and color that is not obtrusive and allows unobstructed viewing of the historic residence from 19th Street. The pilasters may remain as is. The fencing shall be constructed prior to commencement of the gift shop use on the property. 2) Sidewalk shal.1 be constructed and street trees provided on' the Hamilton Street frontage prior to commencement of the gift shop use on the property. 3) One driveway on 19th Street shall be assigned as an "Entrance Only" and the other as an "Exit Only." 4) Street trees shall be installed on 19th Street in accordance with the 19th Street Master Plan. 5) Revised street improvement plans for 19th and Hamilton Streets shall be revised and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of public improvements prior to commencement of use. F-/f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY March 25, 1992 Page 5 6) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL - A request to establish a traffic school in an existing building of 1,348 square feet, located on 3.8 acres of land in the Office District (Subarea 1) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan at 8746 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-102-32. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to establish a traffic violator school at the above-referenced location- B. Surroundin~ Land Use and Zoning: North - Southern Pacific Railroad and vacant land; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Foothill Boulevard and vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Cucamonga Creek Channel, commercial, and vacant; Office and Community Commercial West - Vacant; Public C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Office North - Low Residential South - Special Boulevard and Medium Residential East - Office, Flood Control/Utility Corridor, and Commercial West - Office and Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site currently contains a vacant 1,348 square foot A-frame building, an approximately 800 square foot building utilized as an art gallery, and asphalt parking areas. A number of Eucalyptus trees are planted around the perimeter of the parking lot area. No curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist along the Foothill Boulevart frontage. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. ITEM G ,-/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Private I, 348 1/3 students 18/1 29* School 1/2 faculty (19 total) members Art Gallery 800 1/250 sq. ft. 3 3 TOTAL 22 32* * Refer to Analysis Section B. 2. F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code, Section 17.10. 030, conditionally permits educational institutions within the Office/Professional Development District. However, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan does not reference this type of use. Since the site in question is within an Office Development District, governed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, staff interpreted that a Conditional Use Permit should be required for this use at this location · ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing vacant 1,348 square foot building on the property for a traffic violators ' school. Access to the site will be available via the two existing driveways along Foothill Boulevard. Classes will be held weeknights from 6 p-m. to 10 p.m. and on weekends from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Students will have the option of attending two four-hour weeknight classes or one eight-hour weekend class to complete their requirements- Office hours will take place weekdays from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. The maximum class size will be limited to 40 students, per the requirements of the California Vehicle Code. In addition, the applicant plans to provide a special instructional course for first-time offenders driving under the influence ( DUI ). These classes may be held concurrently with the traffic violators ' school and do not normally exceed 15 students · Please refer to the applicant ' s letter ( Exhibit "E" ) for further details of the proposed business operation. B. Issues: In analyzing the proposed Conditional Use Permit, two specific issues may be associated with this request as follows: 1 · Land Use Compatibility: In this situation, potential land use compatibility concerns can be specifically limited to the land immediately west of the parcel. Land contiguous to the north, south, and east is vacant and includes established public uses (railroad, flood control channel, and Foothill Boulevard). An art PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 3 gallery and picture framing business occupies the small building on the west side of this parcel. The western driveway serves as an access for both sites, and the parking area for these buildings is shared. The art gallery tends to operate sporadically during normal weekday business hours and on weekends. Since the majority of the activity associated with the traffic school will occur during the evening hours, no land use compatibility problems are anticipated with the proposed use at this location. 2. Parking: In reviewing the required parking calculations for uses within the City, staff determined that the proposed application is most closely associated with a private -school use, which requires one parking space per three students and one space per two faculty members. Given the 40-person limitation established by the California Vehicle Code for traffic violator classes, the applicant's intention to have no more than 2 staff members and concurrent special evening classes for 15 students, a total of 19 parking spaces would be required for this use- However, staff believes that the Development Code does not adequately address parking requirements for schools of this nature. Staff anticipates that a majority of the students will drive alone to class. Furthermore, students are less likely to carpool since they are not acquainted with other students prior to attending the traffic school and registration for specific class dates occurs well in advance and tends to be complicated to reschedule. Therefore, staff recommends student and staff parking at a 1 to 1 ratio so that a minimum of 57 parking spaces is provided for this use in addition to the parking spaces required for the art gallery. The Site Plan (Exhibit "B") indicates only 32 spaces; however, in surveying the site, staff determined that 60 spaces can be striped within the existing asphalt area while maintaining- aisle widths required by the Development Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District- A condition has been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval to submit a Site Plan, showing 60 parking stalls, that complies with all applicable City standards for parking lot development prior to striping. Furthermore, the condition will require the parking lot striping to be completed prior to commencement of the use. 3. Parking Lot Lighting. As previously noted, this proposal contemplates the use of the facility for classes on weeknights. Previous users of this facility have operated predominately during daytime hours. The request for nighttime classes, combined with the lack of sufficient parking lot lighting (only one pole-mounted light currently exists in the parking area) and relative isolation of the building, raises a safety issue that, in staff's opinion, should be addressed in order to potentially approve this application- Therefore, staff has incorporated a condition within the attached Resolution of Approval requiring additional parking lot lighting that meets the criteria established by the Police PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 4 Department and the City prior to commencement of the use- In previous discussions, staff suggested that the applicant pursue the feasibility of wall-mounted lighting, as opposed to using light standards within the parking lot, to achieve the lighting requirements without creating a severe financial burden on the tenant and/or owner. The Commission may wish to discuss this requirement and, if appropriate, should modify, delete, or change the hours of operation within the attached Resolution of Approval to reflect the Commission's recommendation. C. Fire District Comments: This space may be used as an "assembly" type occupancy provided specific conditions are met and detailed drawings are submitted to the Fire District and the Building and Safety Division prior to occupancy (see Exhibit "D")- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: A- That the proposed project is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subarea in which the project is located; and B- That the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dail~ Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-10 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB:SH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Fire District Co,~unents Exhibit "E" - Applicant' s Letter Resolution of Approval ~,~ '~ 'l--~,- II ~ -, / ~_ ,, i uITY OF ~~~UCAMONGA Lo~,+,~ ..... .,...,. ..... .-..,, ,TITLE: ~,,f~ N = PLANNING--DIVISION = ...: ,~, = EXHIBIT: SCALE: / , ~ ~= Bathroom # 1 ] Student Seatin~ 1st floor 4' X 8' 32sq ft. ~ ~ ~ F'~oin8 Chairs Bathroom # 2 I Hallway :_ ~ inslructor 4'X 1st floor 4' X 8' 32sq fL ~ 64 sq hd Floor Kitchen/Snack Room Ist FlOor 11~ ~(I~' Loft 1~ X 11' 1st Floor 10' X 12' 120sq ft. 180 sq. ~ Office 165 sq ft. Door Entry| i;;~~ ~ Stairway to Loft Office Azea Student ' Student Seating - "~ Seating - Foldin$ i Cla~~, Foldins ; " Able' '! .' : · , ; Front Door Entry to C!sssroom #1 CItY OF UCAMONGA PLAN ION TrrLE: l":'[ ,., ..~..- pt ~ ~ · .- ...:. . i EXHIBIT: ~C ~, SCALE: R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I:IDIZ DDOTIZCTION DI&TDICT PLAN CHECK REPORT II February 26, 1992 West End Traffic School 8746 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Charles L. Williamson, Owner 12676 Trillium Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 RE: CUP 92-10 1. Occupant load in ~ not to exceed 40 persons as per Vehicle Code - (students/offenders). 2. Occupant load in ~ not to exceed 15 persons as per San Bernardino County Department of Health contract - (students/offenders). 3. Exit door hardware must be self-releasing locks. 4. Show width of exit doom. 5. Emergency lighting required for all areas used by public. 6. One (1) 2A10BC multi-purpose fire extinguisher required on each floor. Susan D. Wolfe SDW/ss CRY OF ..... UCAMONGA Trr~.~.: F~ G~r,,,_+ PLA,N~NG- DIi~ION EXI'EBIT: "D"' SCALE: West End Tr_T_C_affic School 12676 Trillium Court, Rancho Cucarnonga, California 91739 February 4, 1992 Mr. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Hayes: I am in the process of starting a traffic violator school in this city and have chosen a location, 8746 Foothill Blvd., which is very suitable for our need. This area of Foothill Boulevard is considered a "public area" and I wish to ensure that his type of business will be compatible with the' City's plan for that area. Additionally, I don't want to enter into a lease agreement with the property owner until I have the approval of the Planning Department. Traffic violator school is an option, for the recipients of-lraffic tickets fax}m a law enforcement agency, to attend to keep the violation from appearing on their driving records.- After-completing an g-hour California Department of Motor Vehicles approved course, the violator returns.their paperwork to the court for processing. This location would be used as an office, operating during the approximate houn of 10:00 a-re. and 10:00 p.m., and used as a classroom predominately during the evening hours on week-nights, and all day Saturdays and Sundays. Class size is limited to forty stud _~ts per the California Vehicle Code. This location is ap p roximatety 1350 square feet, and has amp le pafidng for more than sixty vehicles. When the business is established I hope to ob~sln a conlract from the San Bemardino Cotmty Department Health to provide instruction for the first time offender convicted ot ~ under the influence. This is a sixteen-week program mandate? for persons convicted ot this olfense, and consists of classroom education hoping to deter the person from committing this offense aseconct tin~. Classes normally do not exceed fifteen students, and it lv, Jcl simultaneously with a trafftc school prolp'am, would not exceed our available parking area. Thank you for your consideration of my request. Ple_~ let me know of your decision as soon as you are able, as I need to submit applications to the Department olMotor Vehicles verlr sxm and cannot do so until I have a physical location for the business. Sincerely, West End Traffic School % OO RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-10, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A TRAFFIC SCHOOL IN AN EXISTING BUILDING OF 1,348 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON 3.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AT 8746 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-102-32. A. Recitals. (i) Charles L. Williamson has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8746 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of approximately 274 feet and maximum lot depth of 686.93 feet and the property is presently improved with two retail/office buildings, an asphalt parking area with two outlets to Foothill Boulevard, and Eucalyptus windrow plantinge; and (b) The property to the north includes the Southern Pacific Railroad and vacant single family residential land; the property to the south is the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way and vacant residential property; the property to the east contains the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, existing retail buildings, and vacant land; and the property to the west is vacant; and (c) The applicant proposes to conduct traffic violator classes weeknights from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. and on weekends from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. In PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 2 addition, the applicant plans to operate special classes for first time offenders caught driving under the influence at the above-referenced times; and (d) The applicant proposes to utilize the facility for administrative purposes weekdays from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. with a maximum of 2 employees at any time~ and (e) The Development Code, Section 17.10.030.C.4, permits private educational institutions in the Office/Professional Development District, subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Con~nission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the. objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. planninq Division 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and all other City ordinances. 2) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 3) Occupancy of the facility shall not con~nence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 3 be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. 5) The total number of students shall not exceed 55 or the maximum occupancy restrictions established by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, whichever is more restrictive. 6) The use shall be limited to a maximum of two employees during weeknight and weekend class hours. 7) Because of the unique nature of the proposed use, a minimum of 60 parking spaces shall be provided within the asphalt parking area. A revised scaled site plan depicting the double- striped parking stalls shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to striping. The parking lot shall be striped per the approved plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to commencement of the use. 8) If any existing healthy, mature trees are to be removed, a Tree Removal Permit shall be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Division prior to removal. 9) Parking lot lighting shall be provided to satisfy the minimum requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and the requirements specified in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A photometric lighting plan indicating compliance with the above-referenced requirements shall be submitted for review and approval of the Police Department and Planning Division, and the lights shall be installed per the approved plans prior to occupancy of the building. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-10 - WEST END TRAFFIC SCHOOL March 25, 1992 Page 4 Enqineerinu Division 1) Dedicate an additional 10 feet of right-of-way along the Foothill Boulevard frontage to provide an ultimate width of 60 feet as measured from the centerline. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST= Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Con~nission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit= AYES= COMMISSIONERS: NOES= COMMISSIONERS= ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the ~lanning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the subsequent Environmental Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475, a residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre ) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Staff recommends certification of the Environmental Impact Report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential ( less than 2 dwelling units per acre ) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06. Staff and the applicant are working to resolve a couple of remaining technical issues. We expect that these issues will be resolved by April 8, 1992, and request a continuance to that date. The applicant has verbally expressed his agreement to the continuance. Res fully su ' ted, BB:SM/jfs ITEMS H, I ¢t~H° ^ / WAL-MART 13,8 ACRE PARCEL FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PHASE - I THE WATTSON COMPANy 3620 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 1OO, NEWPORT NEACI.I, CA 92680 [7141 757-77/6 FAX r7141 757-7788 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - Review of the proposed phasing plan for a previous ly approved commercial retail center in the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, 20, and a portion of 59. BACKGROUND: On June 26, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the conceptual master plan for the Foothill Marketplace center and the Price Club elevations and site plan. As a condition of approval for the project, any proposed phasing of the project requires review and approval by the Planning Commission. With the plans for Price Club and Wal-Mart moving forward, it appears necessary to implement a phasing program in order to allow these tenants to begin construction of their buildings ahead of the balance of the center. The request for phasing the construction of this 60 acre shopping center is not unusual and was expected. The applicant has submitted a proposed phasing plan for the Comm~ssion's consideration (see Exhibit "A"). ANALYSIS: A. Phase I Improvements: Phase I of the center will consist of Price Club and Wal-Mart and the related on-site improvements (parking, landscaping, etc.), the main signalized intersection (Price Club entry), and the most westerly entry (Wal-Mart entry). Also, as required by the parcel map for the site, all off-site street improvements will be required with Phase I for the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue frontages- The signal at the Foothill/Etiwanda intersection will be upgraded to correspond to the expanded street widths and turn lanes. In addition, the applicant is proposing to construct the landscape improvements along the entire Foothill and Etiwanda street frontages. B. Phase II Improvements: Phase II of the center will consist of satellite pads along Foothill Boulevard (Pads 3, 4, 5 and 6) and pads adjacent to Phase I (Pads 7, 8, and 9). With the construction of Phase I, the major circulation aisles will be installed that are necessary to access Pads 6 - 9. With Pads 3 - 5, however, the main drive aisle on the south side of these pads must be constructed. With the construction of any building within this area, the third Foothill entry (Plaza entry) and the drive aisle on the south of the pads shall be installed- Remaining pads within ITEM J . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37'FOOTHILL METPLACE PARTNERS March 25, 1992 Page 2 this area, as with any graded pad fin the center, will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated as required by the conditions of approval for CUP 90-37. C. Western Phase: The balance of the site is broken into what the applicant refers to as the western and eastern phases. While the western phase is depicted as approved with the master plan, discussions with the applicant indicate that substantial changes will be requested based on leases signed with tenants wishing to occupy this portion of the center. As a result, staff suggests that the precise phasing of this area be reviewed concurrently with the Development Review of the buildings for this western phase. D. Eastern Phase: The eastern portion of the project has the potential to be the most delicate in terms of building construction. At present, the applicant continues to work on securing tenants for this area. Because of this "unknown quantity", minor changes in building footprints and drive aisle locations may be encountered. Therefore, the phasing proposed has been designed with the maximum flexibility for the applicant. While the parking areas are proposed to be constructed in two major sections, the building construction is being considered in up to four pieces. The main concern dea~s with the jumping back and forth of the building construction. As identified on the phasing plan, it is possible that a middle building (Major 3) may be developed first, followed by the adjacent shops and Major 4, then jumping to the far eastern portion with the supermarket, Shop A, and Major 2 (back to the west), and finishing this stretch of buildings with the main plaza and plaz~ tenants (Shops B through D). With previous centers, concern has been expressed by the Con~nission abut the unfinished appearance of building sides while waiting for the adjacent building to be constructed. To minimize the potential for unfinished elevations within this center, the Commission may wish to consider two alternatives: 1. When a building is to be constructed and the adjoining building has not been constructed or will not be constructed timely with the proposed building, the elevations should be enhanced so that the building will "stand on its own" until the adjoining building is constructed, or 2. The phasing should be revised to include the construction of adjoining shop buildings when a major is to be constructed. This will minimize the surface area exposed to public view prior to construction of the next phase. The buildings should still receive some architectural enhancement (i.e. stucco finish) to avoid a temporary "blankwall" appearance. Regardless of which approach is preferred by the Co~nission, safe pedestrian connections should be maintained across the site. This may require the construction of temporary sidewalks and barricades across future building pads or active construction sites. In order to maintain the aesthetics of the center, the barricades should be solid and should receive some type of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37-FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS March 25, 1992 Page 3 decorative finish (i.e. paint to match buildings). As a result, a condition of approval has been included in the Resolution to address this situation. In addition to the construction alternatives, the Commission may wish to evaluate the applicant's proposal to install the major plaza area at the end of the center construction. With previous submittals, the Commission was desirous of installing these types of plazas as early as possible. This issue directly relates to the timing of Majors 1 and 2 and in-line retail shops A-D. The final phase (i.e. "EP-E") proposed for the project will be Pads 1 and 2 at the northeast corner of the site. This area includes the activity center identified in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. As previously mentioned, the applicant is proposing to construct the Foothill and Etiwanda frontages with the first phase. Staff feels that a significant portion of the activity center formalized theme can be installed with the initial phase which will not require disruption with Phase I. Staff and the applicant have been working on the design for this corner. While the applicant has broken the project down into many smaller phases, it is their anticipation that phases will actually be constructed concurrently. The overall number of phases may, in fact, reduce as the project gets under way and interest in the center by prospective tenants increases. In the event that this does not occur, staff feels that the phasing plan submitted, with the noted concerns about the eastern phase, will achieve the Planning Commission's desire of a well planned, well balanced, and quality commercial retail center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed phasing plan for Foothill Marketplace (CUP 90-37) and conditionally approve the plan through adoption of the attached Resolution. BB:SM:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "B" - Resolution No. 91-86 Approving CUP 90-37 Resolution of Approval ZI I ~ o, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: ~/V/;/~/V'A/~/~" ~A,/:,i,r' ~-~7 SU~ECT: _~~ ~~'~ APPLICANT: ~ ~~ ~NN/ Those items c~e~ am ~ions of ~val. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE' PLANNING DNISION, (714)96t.1661, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. time LImits 1.Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, if building permits are not issued or atoproved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of al:~roval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be appmved I;Htor to / / - 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of v/ 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced / / participated in. or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Distdct (CFD} for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance conlnaction and/or maintenance of a fire station to sewe the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shaft become the Oistricrs property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the devek:~er shall comply with all applicable IN and regulaliont The CFD sham be formed by the District and the deveiopar by the time recordation ~t the final map occum. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building parrnlts, whichever comes / /__ first, the aC~licant shall consent to, or participae in, the eetal:)limnt of a Melio-Rcos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necetsary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously estallshed such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shaH, in the aiternmtve, conlent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing DistriCt prior to the recordation of the final mad or the issuance of building permits, whichaver comes lirst. Further, if the affected S~hool district has not formed a Melio-Rcos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of al:~roval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This conclition shall be waived if lhe City receives notice that the applicant sCI~ool di~ricts have enterecl into an agreement to privately 8ccommodat~ any 8ncl.all school impacts as a resuit of this proiect. V/ 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved. written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer ancl water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be sul~mitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of sulxlivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developeel and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans. architectural elevations. exterior materials anti colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division. the conditions containe~l herein, Development Code regulations. and ,,r,::~.7-///z.~ Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2.Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. v/ 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complis<l with. Prior to occupancy. plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building styall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. V/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V/ 5. All site. grading. landscape, irrigation, and street irnlxovement plans shall be coordinated for consistency priorto issuance of any pen'nits (such as gracling, tree removal. encroachment, building, etc.). or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subclivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. V/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive cemt:diance with all sections ot the Development Code. all other aplDlicable City Ordinances, and ap!Dlica~le Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Pen'nit issuance. 7. A detaileel on-site lighting plan Shall be reviewed and aplxovecl by the City Planner and Sherfff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of t}uilding permits. Such plan shall indicate style. illumination, location, height. and methocl of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propertieS. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielde~:l from pul)lic view. v/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City starKlarcls. The final clesign, locations. and Me nurnt}er of Irash receptacles Shall be sul)ject to City Planner review and aplDroval prior to issuance of building permits. v'/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc.. shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls. herruing. and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ' .F--~,'Y/~Y'7" SC - 2/91 2 or 12 11. Street names shall be sul~mitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. v/' 12. All INiiding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes. physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, sl~all be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordatlon of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails. including fencing and drainage devices. in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in sulxlivislons shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the apfxoval of the Pinning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whictiever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. v/ 16. Allparkways. openareas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptaisle to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be sul:H'nitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subclivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or .. issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows try vegetation. structures. fixtures or any other object, exceiX for utility wires and similar ot)jects, pursuant to Develogxnent Code Section 1-7.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Histom Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to. exterior alterations ancL/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures. or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Bullcling 0eslgn 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide clomestio hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgracled with architectura~ treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sul:qect to City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits. ,~-,Y.~/x:~/'/" s. Slar~ara patio cover plans for use ~y the Hom~wne~' ~sociat~n s~all ~e su~mm~ tot ~ / C~ ~lanner a~ Bui~i~ ~jJl revie~ a~ ~;roval ~r~r ~o issua~e ot ~i~i~ ~s. / 4. All r~f a~dena~s, indudi~ air ~ne~ a~ other r~f ~umed ~uip~nt a~/or / / pmjed~ns, shall ~ shie~ from view a~ t~ sound ~er~ from adjacent pm~dies a~ streets as r~uir~ by the Planni~ Divis~n. Such ~reening shall ~ amhR~urally im~rm~ w~h the ~i~i~ des~n a~ ~tm~ to the smi~ad~n of the C~y Planner. Details shall ~ includ~ in ~ildi~ pla~. D. Pa~ing a~ Veh~ulr AcuU (Inei~e 6~sils on ~ulMIng plsns) ~ 1. All ~mi~ ~t la~ isla~s shall have a mini~ m ~s~ dimens~n of 6 feet a~ shall / / comain a 12-i~h walk MjaMN to tM Nmi~ mall (im~i~ / 2. Te~ur~ ~emdan pm~ays aM te~ur~ ~ve~m ~mss cir~lm~n ais~s shall ~ / / pmv~ed thmug~ut the deve~pmem ~ ~n~ ~ell~unR~i~i~ wRh ~n s~ce~ plazafr~reat~nal uses. / 3. All paming ~es shall ~ ~ble st~ ~r C~ ma~ffis aM all d~ay aisles, / / emra~es, a~ exRs shall N ~ ~r C~ ma~affis. 4. All un~s shall ~ pmv~ed wHh garage ~r o~Mm ff d~ays am less than 18 feet in / de~h from M~ of s~ealk. 5. ~e Covehams, ~itions a~ Res~ sMII re~ ~e stor~ of r~rem~nal veh~les / / on th~ s~e unless they am the ~ml ~ of tmn~nm~n for tM owner aM pmhib~ pami~ on intent cirmim~n aisles otMr Ihan in d.~Mt~ v~e~ ~i~ ames. 6. Plans for any s~r~ gaes sMII N suml~ for tM C~ Planner, CiW E~i~er, a~ / / Ra~ CuMm~a Fire Pmtffi~n D~ reviw a~ a~v~ ~rto ismame of ~ildi~ ~s. E. Undoping (for publlc~ maimsine iMm arm, Nit to il~ N.) / 1. A detail~ la~~ a~ i~t~n ~an, im~i~ s~ ~ami~ a~ ~1 ~m la~ / i~ in the ~se ~ mslmil devemm, s~ ~ ;e~ ~ a I~n~ la~ amh~ffi a~ sub~N~r C~ Ra~r ~aN a~al ~to t~/a~of ~i~i~ ~s or p~r fill ~ ~vi in t~ ~se d a mmom ~ ~Ni~n. / 2. Ex~ti~ trees ~i~ to ~ ~eHw~ in p~ s~ll ~ ~~ ~h a ~nm~n ~mer / /.__ in a~~ ~h tM i~ ~ ~ 19.M. 110, ~ ~ me on tM grMi~ plans. ~e ~n ~ 'rose ~ to N Wee~e in m aN nw mt~ for tra~a~ trees shall M s~n ~ tM Ntai~ I~ pins. h ~ ~1 folN all of tN mrist's 3. Aminimm~ tr~rgmss~m,~~offfiefol~s~es, sMIINpmvid~ / w~hin t~ ~ojffi: % - ~- i~h ~x or la~er, % - 3& i~ ~x or la~er, __ % - 24- i~h ~x or i~r, __ % - 15~Nin. ~ __ % - 5 galln. ~ 4. A ~nimm of ~ % of trees ~am~ within the ~ mall M ~imn s~e trees- ., 24-i~ ~x or lair. ~ 5. ~thin pami~ lots, trees shall N ~am~ m a rme of one 15~lln tre for e~ three pami~ malls, sufficiem to shade 50% of the ~mi~ area m ~ir ~n on Au~st 21. C~mDt~uo~ Dat~: G. Trees shall be plantecl in areas of public view 8cliace nt t0 8ncl 810ng struulu res 8t 8 rate at ane tree per 30 linear feet of builcling. / /-- · /' 7. AIIl~rivateslolNbanks51eetorlessinverlicalheightanclofS:l orgreatersioN, butle~than / /__ 2:1 slol~, shall IDe, at minimum, irrigatacl anti 18nclscapecl with 81~rol3riste grouncl cover for erosion control. SIoN IDIanting recluirect by this section shall inclucle a I:)elTnanent irrigation syslsm to be installecl by the cleveioper prior to occul~ncy. v/ 8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof2:l orgreater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In acldltion. slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to re leasing occupancy for those u nits, an inspect ion shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10.. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the publiC right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and rimming. Any clamaged, deed, diseased, or decaying plant matedal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date ol damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. v/' 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be sul3iecl to City Planner review and aplyoval and coon:linated for consistency with any padevay landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. , · / 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / ing sidewalks (with horizoniN cringe), and inlensitied iartdscaping, is required along v/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the publiC right-of-way on / / the perimeter of this projecl area shall be continuously maintained I:)y the developer. v/ 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in publiC maintenance areas .... ./ / _ the design shall be coon;linated with the Engineering Division. V/ 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and sulxnltted for City Planner review and __' -- approval prior to issuance of building parmite. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth cl~aracteristics of the selected tree s;ecies. v/ 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucemonga Municil)al Co~le. F. SIgns v// 1. ~e signs i~t~ on the subm~ plans are ~e~ual only and ~t a pad of this ~mval. / /- Any s;ns pm~d for this ~ve~p~nt shall ~ly with the S~n Ordinate a~ shall require ~parme ~lication a~ ~proval by the Planni~ Divis~n pr~r to installat~n of any s~ns. 2. A U nfform S~n Pr~ram for this deve~pmem sh'all ~ subm~ for ~ review a~ / / ~roval pdor to issua~e of bui~i~ ~Rs. 3. Dir~o~ monumem s~n(s) shall ~ mv~ for a~mm, ~o~nium, or town~s / / pr~r to ~u~y a~ shall r~im separate a~n a~ ~mval by the Ranni~ D~is~n p~r to issua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. G. Environmental 1. ~e deve~r shall prov~e ea~ pms~ive ~yer w~en ~t~e of the Foudh Street Ro~ / / Crusher projffi in a sta~a~ fo~m as ~te~n~ by the C~ Planner, p~r to a~e~i~ a cash de~s~ on any p~e~. 2. ~e develo~r shall provide ea~ pm~e ~yer w~en ~t~ ol t~ C~y ~ / / S~ial S~dies Zo~ for the R~ Hill FauR, in a ~a~ffi fo~ ~ dete~in~ by t~ C~ Planner, pmr to a~e~i~ a ~sh ~s~ on a~ ~. 3. ~e develo~r shall ~v~e e~h m~Ne buyer w~en ~t~e of t~ Foothi Fre~ay / / pm~ in a maim fo~at as dete~i~ ~ t~ C~ P~r, ~r to ~i~ a cash de~ on any p~. 4. A final a~um~al rein Shall ~ ~m~ed for C~ Pinnet rev~ a~ ~val ~r to the / / issua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. ~e final r~R s~ ~ss tM ivel of ime~r ~ise a~enum~n to be~w 45 CNEL, t~ ~iMi~ ~edal ~ ~nm~n t~nqu~ pmv~, a~ ff ~mpdme, ve~ t~ ~i~ ol t~ mR~n ~mres. T~iMi~ ~ans will ~ ch~ for ~No~e wi~ t~ m~m~n ma~res ~main~ in t~ fill r~. H. ~her AgenclM 1. Em~e~H~mu~ll~mv~ina~ffimw~hRmC~m~aFire / / Pmte~n Dim~ 9a~am. / 2. Em~e~a~esss~ll~v~,mime~frH~cMar, a minimm of 26 feet w~e / / m all times ~d~ ~~ in a=ffim dh Rm C~~ Fire Pmt~n Dist~ r~immnl. / 3. Pr~r to i~ of ~i~ ~s for ~sti~ ~t~in, e~eme shall subm~ to tM Rm ~m~ Rm P~in D~ tl te~a~ wmer m~ for fire pmtffi~ i ~aili, ~i~ ~t~n of rlir~ fire ~t~n s~tem. / 4. ~e ~m s~ll ~ma m U. S. ~tal ~ to ~e~ t~ ~me ~ a~ / ~at~n of mad ~xes. MuRi-fami~ res~emial ~vemms s~ll ~vl a ~ll ove~ad st~ure for rail ~xes w~ rome I~i~. ~e f~al ~=n of ~ ~ ~xes a~ the des~n of the ove~ad ~re ~all N su~ffi to C~ Pin~r mva ~ mval pr~r to the ~sua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. 5. For pmjffis usi~ se~ ta~ faCilities, w~en ~nff~t~n of ~a~l~, i~bdi~ all ' / suffice iffio~at~n, shall N o~ai~ from t~ San Bem~i~ ~my O~mm of Environmemal HeaRh a~ subm~ to the ~i~i~ ~il ~r to t~ i~ua~e of ~ptmc Tank Pe~s, a~ pr~r to issua~e of ~i~ing pemts. CornDlet.,lo~'l APPLICANT$ SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND 5AF~ DIVISION, ~14) 989-1~3, FOR COMPLIANCE ~ ~E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. 5N~ Develo~em ~ 1. The ~pl~am shall ~ly w~h the latest a~pt~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ C~e, Unffo~ M~hani- / / cal C~e, Unffo~ Plumbi~ C~e, Nat~nal Elffi~ ~e, a~ all other a~li~ble ~des, ordinates, a~ r~ulmbns in eff~ m the tim of is~a~e of relatNe ~its. Please coma~ the Bui~i~ a~ SafeW DNis~n for ~pies of the C~e A~n Offiina~e a~ ~l~able han~uts. 2. P~r to issuan~ of ~i~i~ peaits for a n~ resttotal ~elli~ un~(s) or mawr a~n / to eximi~ un~(s), the ~li~m shall pay Nve~mntfes m tM emlish~ rme. ~ fees may i~lude, but am ~t lim~ to: C~ ~autff~bn Fe, Pare Fe, DrNnage Fee, Symems Devebpmnt Fee, Pe~ a~ Plan Ch~i~ Fees, aM ~1 Fees. / 3. P~r to image of ~i~ing ~s for a n~ ~m/I or i~mdal ~ve~pmm or / / a~it~n to an existi~ deve~pmm, tM ~l~m sMII ~y ~ve~mm fees m the est~ished rme. Such fees may i~lude, ~ are ~t li~ to: Syme~ Deve~ment Fee, Drainage Fee, ~ol Fees, Perm~ and Pin Ch~ Fees. / 4. Street a~resses shall N pmv~ by the Bui~i~ ~il, a~er tra~mel ~ r~rdat~n a~ p~r to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~Rs. J. ExiMIng 9~ure 1. Pmv~e ~;lia~e w~h the Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~ for the ~ line cleara~es / / ~ns~ed~ use, area, a~ fim-msimNeneu of ex~i~ ~i~i~s. 2. Existi~ ~i~ings shall N ~e to ~ w~h ~ffffi ~iMi~ a~ zoni~ r~ulm~ns for / the ime~ use or the ~i~i~ shall N Nml~. / 3. Eximi~ seage di~sal ladlels shall N remv~, fil~ a~or~ to ~y with the / /__ Un~o~ P~mi~ C~ a~ Un~o~.~i~i~ ~e. / 4. U~mu~ on-~e milRis are to be mt~ a~ s~ on ~i~ ~s ~m~ for / / ~i~i~ ~ ~t~n. K. GrMlng ~ 1, Gradi~ of tN ~ ~y sMII N m ~r~ w~h ~ U~ ~i~i~ ~, C~ / Gradi~ Stare, aM ~M gr~i~ ~ms. ~ INI g~i~ Nn s~il ~ in su~ami/~No~ dh tN ~e grM~ ~. / 2. A ~ils r~ SMII N ~rM by a ~alif~ e~i~r ~ by tN Stme of CaI~omia to / /-- ~do~ ~ ~m. / 3. ~e devemm is ~ wffhin tM ~il ems~n ~ml ~~s; a ~il D~u~e / / Pe~ ~ r~ired. PMa~ ~m~ San Bemffim~u~ ~amm of ~eum m (714) ~7-2111 for pe~ ~t~n. ~mma~n of m~ ~N s~ N ~m~ to the C~y p~r to tM ~ame of m~h grMi~ ~. __ 4. A g~~l r~d shall N pre~r~ by a qualff~ e~imr or g~im a~ ~m~ at / the time of ~l~t~n for gradi~ plan c~. / 5. ~efinalgradi~ansshallN~mplet~a~mv~rto~sua~eof~i~i~rm~s. Com~leuo~ DatP 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ----/ / drainage facilities necessan/for alewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto / / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided / / properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / / Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or conlx}site basis.) e. All slope benks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses / / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be coffq)leted to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 ol the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISlON, (714) i8~-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehk:ular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets. / / .. community trails, public paseos, public landscape area, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. V/ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets / / (measured from street centedine): total feet on total feet on' 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made --j / - for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following slits: / v"' 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of ilding permits. where no map is involved. / Z-- 7- SC - 2/9! 8 of 12 ~ / or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a I O-foot minimum building restriction area on the / / neigrd~odng lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho CucarnonOa the rfght to prohibit the construction of (residential) txlilclings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as touiiding restriction areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v/ 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / the final map. V/' 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way / / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. v/ 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum / / of 7 feet measured from the face of cures. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / necessary to COnstruct the required public improvementS, and it he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to COmplete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all COsts incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in COnnection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these COsts shall be in the form of a CaSh deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at deveioper's COst. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to COmmencement ol the appraisal. M, Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, COmmunity trails, paseos, / / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be COnstructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum ol 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / /.__ COnstructed for all half-section streets. /' 3. Construct the following perimeter street irnl:xovements including, but not limited to: / 51'RE~ NAME CURB & A.C. SIDE DRIVE S11~ ~ COMM. MEDIAIN OTHER GtIT'I~R Im/M'Y WALK APPR. uG!.rll TR~E8 TRAIL iShAND a-~l~, ','9 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and oredays will be determined dudng plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shell be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. v/4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street iml~rove- merits, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public fight-of-way, fees shall be paid and a t / construction permit shall be o~ained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, "d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new constmction or reconstruction / / of major, secondam or collector streets which intersect with Other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shah be placed on beth sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations appmved by the City Engineer. Notes: / /- (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specllled by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City / 1 Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shaft remain open to traffic at all times with / /.~ adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may de required. A cash / deposit shall de provide to cover the cost of fadk~ and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated finage flows shall not cross sidewaks. Under sidewalk dralr~.s shall be / / installed to City Stare, except for single family lots. h. HandiCap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. / i. Street names shall be apix'oved by the City Planner pdorto subtotal for first plan check. / 5. Street irqxovement plans per City Standards for all prtvate streets Shall be provided for / /- review and approval by lhe City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pn- vae streets, fees shall be paid aj'ld coflstrtlctioll parTtilts Shill be edtalfled from the City Engineer's Office in addition Io any other panTtitS required. V/ 6. Street trees, a minirrajm of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in __/ accordance with the City:s street tree program. // 7, Inters~n line of site deserts shall ~ reviewed by the C~y E~ineer for conformance with ' a~pted ~l~y. / a. On ~ll~or or larger mreets, lines of s~ffi shall ~ plo~ for all proj~ imerse~ions, / i~ludi~ dr~eways. Walls, s~ns, a~ s~s shall ~ I~at~ outs~e the lines of s~ht. La~i~ a~ other obstm~ns w~hin the lines of sight shall ~ appmv~ by the C~y E~ineer. b. L~al res~emial mreet imem~ns shall have their ~t~e~il~y improved, u~ally by / /__ moving the 2 +/- c~sest street trees on each s~e ~ay from the street a~ placed in a street tree easerant. 8. A pe~R shall ~ oMained from CALTRANS for any ~m w~hin t~ foldwing ~f-way: / / 9. All ~blic impmvemems on the fol~wi~ struts s~ll ~ o~rat~l~ ~mplete pdor to the / /-- issua~e of bui~i~ ~s: N. Pul311c Maintenance Arems V" 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, ;:::cc, ;;z,;.,.--;,';;;, ;;;.;;~, ,,, ,4; a,: c::... are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: / t/ 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. sf 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation system shell be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City. f/ 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shell conform to the results of the respective / / Beautitication Master Ran: O. Drainage anti Flood Control 1. The project (or penions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / /- protection measures shell be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by me City En(liner. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to heve the current FIRM Zone / / designation removed from the project area. The deveioper's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shell be obtained from FEMA prior to final map al:q:H'oval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. ,. v"' 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. ~. ~ permit from lhe Gour~ Rood Control ~md~ ~ r~u~r~ tot ~o~ ~n ~s r~t-o~-~a~. ~ ./ ._ / 5, Trees are prohib~ w~hin 5 feet of the outs~e diameter of any publ~ storm drain pipe / measur~ from the outer edge ol a mature tree trunk. / 6. Public sto~ drain easements shall ~ grad~ to ~nvey ove~lows in the evem of a blo~age in a sump ~tch basin on the ~bl~ street. P. Utilities V 1. Prov~e separate utiliW se~es to each pamel i~di~ san~a~ sewerage sy~em, water, ~ / .., gas, el~ ~wer, telep~ne, a~ ~ble ~ (all u~e~mund) in a=~a~e w~h the Util~ Sta~ards. Easements shall ~ pmvid~ as require. / 2. The deve~r shall ~ res~nsible for the rel~ation of existi~ util~ies as ne~ssa~. / / 3.Water a~ sewer plans shall be des~n~ a~ ~n~ed to meet the r~iremems of the .J J Cucam~a Cou~ Water Dist~ (CCWD), Ra~ Cuum~a Fire Protffi~n DistrY, a~ the Environmemal Heath Depa~nt of the Coumy of San Bemardi~. A le~er of ~mplia~e from the CCWD is r~uimd pdor to final m~ ~val or issua~e of ~s, wh~hever ~u~ first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals · / t/' 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or J / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: / .J 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. · '/ 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Manline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan / / - Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. t/' 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: ] / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community· Fadlities Districl shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building peltnits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalizatlon of any development phase, sufficient imlxovement plans Shall be com- / pieted beyond the phase beundades to assure secondap/access and drainage protection to the satisfaction ol the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative maP. RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 , A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT 90-37, A REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR A ±60 ACHE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 550,000 SQUARE FEET OF LEASABLE SPACE AND A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE PRICE CLUB FACILITY IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, AND 20. A. Recitals. (i) Foothill Marketplace Partners has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as ~ollows: (a) The application applies to a ~60 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of ~2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard and ±600 feet along Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and is developed w~th single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an industrial business, is being developed with a water transmission facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for Con~nercial and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for Conu~ercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga$ and (d) In conjunction with this application, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the land use designation within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan from Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial. Provisions were previously incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow for such a change through review and approval of a Master Plan~ and (e) The development of a ~550,000 square foot retail/commercial center is consistent with the Regional Related Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of =he district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Co~mission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Con~nission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 3 Planninq Division 1) Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for the conceptual master plan for the entire shopping center and the detailed site plan and elevations for Price Club. All other buildings and/or pads will require the approval of a separate Development Review or Conditional Use Permit application, as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 2) Approval of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 is contingent upon approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. An arborist's report shall be prepared to address the possible preservation and/or relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arborlet shall be selected by the City and paid for by the developer. 4) No occupancy shall be permitted for any user until all street improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the City. 5) If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 6) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. 7) Parking lots along Foothill and Etiwanda shall be fully screened from the street through the use of ~3 foot berms, low screen walls, and/or shrub planting.. The final details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 8) A Uniform Sign Program shall be prepared. for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. The program shall consist of all on-site signage including, but not limited to, monument signs, directional signs, and' wall signs. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 4 9) All future pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control prior to occupancy of any building. Details shall be included with the landscape and irrigation plans. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 10) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standards, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, etc., shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 11) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 12) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and, in no event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13) There shall be provision for security patrol of the shopping center at least three times per evening, seven days per week, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. by a licensed private patrol. 14) Bus shelters on Etiwanda Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with street improvements and shall be architecturally compatible to the center. Final location and design of the bus shelters shall be Submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 15) Any transformers, service areas, or trash enclosures located near the setbacks of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only be considered when they are screened by using a combination of walls, berms, and landscaping. 16) The freeWay right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped, or an in-lieu fee paid, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-185. The landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planner or the in-lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 17) Specimen-size trees (36-inch box or larger) shall be. provided at key locations including, but not limited to, entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 5 type and location of the trees shall be shown on the final landscape plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 18) Any outdoor vending machines shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the buildings. The vending machines shall not extend out into the pedestrian walkways. A recycling permit application shall be submitted for any recycling center and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 19) Trash enclosures shall be designed to incorporate the following design features to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of the shopping center. b. Separate pedestrian access, including a self- closing door, that do~s not require opening of the main doors. c. Roll-up doors. d. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. e. Architecturally integrated overhead trellis. f. Chain link screen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden from view. 20) The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to obtain permission to grade onto adjacent properties in order to eliminate the need for retaining walls along the south property line. Such evidence shall be presented to the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 21) If permission to grade off-site cannot be obtained, landscape plans for Metropolitan Water District shall be reviewed to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron fencing on top of the retaining wall in order to minimize the impact of the solid wall. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 6 22) Prior to the issuance of any permits or acceptance of any future application, the applicant shall submit architectural plans, colors, and details to further define the architectural vocabulary expected for the center. The information (including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted equipment for Price Club) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 23) A plan of development for on-site amenities shall be established to "tie" the site together through pedestrian-scale linkages. Elements to consider include, but are not limited to, bardscape treatment and patterns, landscaping, trellises, kiosks, street furniture, seating area, plazas, building features, signage, etc. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 24) The final design of the retaining wall along the freeway off-ramp shall be -reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 25) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 7 26) Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equal to 5 percent of the required automobile parking stalls, up to a maximum of 100 bicycle storage spaces. Security racks shall be provided for each storage space and shall be located near main building entrances in highly visible areas to minimize theft and vandalism. An aisle or other space shall be provided for bicycles to enter and leave the storage spaces with a minimum width of 5 feet to the front or rear of a standard 6-foot bicycle parked in the space. Historic Preservation 1) The applicant shall underwrite the cost of not more than six interviews as part of a City approved Oral History Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. The program shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HABS/HAER standards by an architect approved by the City and paid for by the applicant. The documents shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of permits for either demolition or relocation. 3) The applicant shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. These homes shall be available for such donation over a period of 180 days and the applicant shall pay for relocation costs to the point of delivery of the houses to the lots, with the foundations for the homes to be completed by others. Advertisements shall be placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and The Sun newspapers, at a minimum, every weekend during the 180-day period. The size. of the advertisement shall be one-eighth page and the content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the submittal to the newspapers. Parcels located in the historic community of Etiwanda will be given first preference. All documentation demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to the issuance of demolition permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 8 4) The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will submit no less than three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 5) The applicant shall use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform Sign Program. 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new structure. Enqineerinq Division 1) Existing Overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary. c. Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be' removed concurrently with the removal of the existing houses on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 9 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follows: a. Full width on the south side including the median curb. b. The ultimate backbone system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes ( 27-foot wide pavement ) and the median curb or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. c. Landscape the median island. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across- the-street properties. d. Construct a complete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with transitions to meet existing pavement east on Foothill Boulevard and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also the traffic signals shall be modified at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved by the City Engineer. If improvement of the intersection requires alterations to the existing building(s) at the Foothill Bouelvard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the structure(s) shall be reviewed for their historical significance by the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission and appropriate mitigation measures established. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the mitigation measures assocated with the intersection improvements from future development as it occurs on the affected properties. e. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Devel.opment Fee for the portion of improvements determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed or the impact of this development in conformance with Ordinance No. 455. 3 ) The traffic signal shall be installed at the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard at the developer ' s expense. 4) The median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical about the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 10 centerline or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The Foothill Boulevard busbay shall be moved westerly to be as close as possible to the median opening to reduce potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. 6) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to accommodate the street improvements necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. 7) Provide double (opposite direction) left turn lanes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer 8) Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busbay on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busbay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk in accordance with City Standard No. 304 on Etiwanda Avenue. The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except for the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard and as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10) A final traffic study showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11) A lot .line adjustment shall be recorded to incorporate the northerly portion of APN 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of APN 229-031-16 into this project prior to the issuance of building permits. 12) All of the project driveways and the internal drive aisles to be used by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless justification is provided for a lesser design radius as approved by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 11 13) The property necessary for the proposed freeway off- ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall be reserved. It appears that Caltrans will not allow the retaining wall shown on the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown on the plans will need to be reserved as approved by Caltrans and the City Engineer. Also, the project plans will need to be modified accordingly. 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as follows: a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterly 6± acres). b. General City area fees for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. c. A payment equivalent to the Day Creek Mello Roos Assessment of $4,675 per acre for the portion of the site currently outside the Day Creek Channel Mello Roos District boundary. 15) Approval shall be obtained from the Municipal Water District and San Bernardino County Flood Control District to accept the existing flows from north of Foothill Boulevard to the facility along Arrow Highway and Day Creek Channel. If such approvals cannot be obtained, alternate facilities such as those required by the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer. 16) Intersection drains shall be provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue'sized to convey as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17) Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north side of FRothill Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 18) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the drainage entering the property from the adjacent Caltrans area to the west. 19) The small portion of the southeast corner of the property shall be regraded to drain to the Municipal Water District facility. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 12 20) Construct storm drain facilities to serve the site generally as shown on the plans and as described in the project's preliminary drainage report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21) Easements for and permission to construct storm drain facilities on and convey flows to off-site properties shall be obtained and provided as approved by the City Engineer. 22) Easements for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. 23) The developer and the City shall enter into an agreement that transfers maintenance responsibilities from the City to the developer for the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time that alternate facilities for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. , · ATT _ ~rad B~ SeXy I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, VALLETTE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-37 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE), A 60 ACRE COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN 1-15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, 20, AND A PORTION OF 59. A. Recitals. (i) On June 26, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 91-86, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, a commercial retail center on 60 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. (ii) On August 21, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 91-248, thereby affirming, subject to one modification, the Planning Commission's approval of the project. (iii) Planning Division Condition No. 5 states that "If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of building permits for the center." (iv) Foothill Marketplace Partners has filed an application for the approval of the phasing plan for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-37 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Phasing Plan request shall be referred to as "the application." (v) On March 25, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commis'sion hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS March 25, 1992 Page 2 (a) The application applies to a ~60 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of ±2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard and ±600 feet along Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and (b) The property to the north is designated for commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is developed with an industrial business, is being developed with a water transmission facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for commercial and residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for commercial and residential uses and is vacant; and (c) The phasing plan will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed phasing plan is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed phasing plan, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed phasing plan complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission finds that the Negative Declaratibn issued on August 21, 1992, adequately addresses the proposed impacts of the application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition'set forth below: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS March 25, 1992 Page 3 1) All pertinent conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-86 shall apply. 2) The precise phasing of the Western Phase shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the time of Development Review applications for the buildings. 3) Improvements along Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be installed with Phase I. Improvements shall include public improvements (i.e. streets, signals, storm drains, etc.), landscaping, and sidewalks to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. 4) With the construction of Pad 3, 4, or 5, the drive aisle to the south and the entry drive to the east shall be installed. 5) Phase I shall include the installation of the landscaping and sidewalk along the east side of the signalized entry drive aisle (Price Club entry), the west side of the westerly entry drive aisle (Wal-Mart entry), and any necessary temporary sidewalk connections to complete the connection from Foothill Boulevard to Price Club and Wal-Mart. 6) Pad 6 (gas station) shall be included in Phase II. 7) Temporary sidewalk connections shall be installed where necessary to maintain safe pedestrian access. The sidewalk designs and locations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner with each construction phase prior to issuance of building permits. 8) Temporary barricades, with decorative finish, shall be installed, as required by the City, in order to maintain safe pedestrian access during construction activity. The design and location of the barricades shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner with each construction phase prior to issuance of building permits. 6. THe Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS March 25, 1992 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT ON FREEWAY LANDSCAPING ABSTRACT: The Commission requested this item be placed on this agenda for discussion regarding landscaping the future Route 30 Freeway. BACKGROUND: In October 1987, the Planning Commission adopted their Resolution No. 87-185 (see attached) establishing a policy requiring landscaping of the 1-15 Freeway right-of-way. This policy expressed the Commission 's concern with the importance of this regional transportation corridor. The policy was an extension of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which states that "views along the (I-15) freeway have a major impact on the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga." The policy has been applied to all new development adjacent to the I- 15 Freeway. Since 1987 fees in-lieu of construction have been used in all cases because Caltrans (1) has no master plan of landscaping and (2) will not allow small segments to be installed. The policy has been upheld twice upon appeal to the City Council. The attached exhibit shows the remaining undeveloped land, without approved projects, that would be affected by any new landscaping policy for Route 30. The landscape frontage of the Route 30 Freeway is approximately 15 miles (7 1/2 miles on each side) throug~ the City. Staff estimates that there is approximately 2 miles of vacant, undeveloped land, without entitlemants, which either adjoins the Route 30 right-of-way or the Highland Avenue right-of-way. The majority of this land lies east of Rochester Avenue. At the last joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission Route 30 Subcommittees, staff was directed to address several key issues still remaining with regards to the development of plans for the Route 30 Freeway. Staff was directed to set up a meeting with the other affected cities along the Freeway Corridor to discuss items of mutual concern including landscaping. Staff hopes to report to the Planning Commission at the next meeting as to when the meeting with the neighboring cities has been set. Resp ly subm ed, BB: DC/jfs Attachments: Resolution No. 87-185 Residential Applications Map (Planning Commission only) ITEM K RESOLUTION NO. 87-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A POLICY REQUIRING - LANDSCAPING OF FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it desirable to landscape the 1-15 (Devote) Freeway right-of-way because of its significance as a regional transportation corridor through the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds this resolution necessary to give property owners and developers notice of this policy. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby declare their policy to be: 1. That all new development adjacent to the 1-15 (Devote) Freeway shall be required to landscape and irrigate the freeway right-of-way adjoining their development site. 2. That the landscaping and irrigation shall be in conformance with Cal trans Master P1 anti ng P1 an through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. That the new development and the landscaped portion of the 1-15 Freeway shall be annexed to an existing Landscape Maintenance District or a new Landscape Maintenance District shall be formed ..affecting the same properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14thDAY OF October , 1987. PLANNING C(X~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TEST: AT ray 11 Y) e~-Beputy Secre~ I, B Bu er, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Conm~ission of'the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly i,ntroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of OCTOBER , 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COIv!4ISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CHITlEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COQ~4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO~4ISSIONERS: NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: BRIDGES - LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS RECOMMENDATION: The Trails Advisory Committee recomends that the Planning Commission establish a policy, requiring 5-foot bridges over concrete drainage swales separating the local feeder trail from the rear yard/corral area where the swale is greater than 3 feet in width or 12 inches in depth. ANALYSIS: The City currently has no standard, nor does the Planning Commission have any policy regarding access across drainage swales. Drainage swales are used to collect and direct water from the trail to a safe point of discharge. These drainage swales are usually a concrete "V" gutter design located adjoining the side of the trail and, in some cases, crossing the trail. The example used by staff to develop bridge criteria was Tract No. 13738 (Rodine), located at the southwest corner of Almond and Sapphire Streets. The attached exhibit shows the construction detail that was approved; however, the actual construction differs somewhat. The bridges are of high quality and are attractive in appearance. Staff feels that the bridges were appropriate in this instance because the extra width (5 feet) and extra depth (18-24 inches) of the swale makes it impossible for horses to safely access the trail. The drainage swale separates the trail from the rear yards. Similar bridges were installed across the swale in the local feeder trail along the southerly boundary of Tract No. 10349 (Walton Construction), located at Thoroughbred and Sapphire Streets · BB:DC/jfs Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Bridge Detail ITEM L ViCI,,HT,~-~M ~ ~AI~ / -- ' I ....... "~j - " " KEY PLAN " FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE i~ ,T S SICKEL O^T': ,....,.~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~-,,z, -,,:~ PHASE ' I "~'~'~" '~"' ""~'" '~"~'~' ~ e~h ~L S~ ~ N~ ~ u ~ PHASING PLAN THE W~TTSON COMPANY (~x~) ~7-~n r~ (?H) ~-~u ,. M~ ~ 2TR~, 8~ ~ IWPO~ ~ CA 922~ SHEET ~. ~! 751'~ F~ ..1 757-nee " AI'O