HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/09/23 - Agenda Packet.= -
1977
WEDNESDAY
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 23, 1992
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
7:00 P.M.
III.
IV.
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea
Commissioner McNiel
Commissioner Melcher
Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Vallette
Announcements
Approval of Minutes
August 26, 1992
Adjourned Meeting of September 1, 1992
September 9, 1992
V. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected
to be routine and non-controversial. They will be
acted on by the Commission at one time without
discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890
- GREYSTONE - The design review of building
elevations and detailed site plan for 87 lots
(Phases 1 and 2) of a previously approved
vesting tract map consisting of 165 single
family lots on 40 acres of land in the Low
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) located on the north side of Highland
Avenue, south of Banyan Avenue and west of Deer
Creek Channel - APN: 201-092-1 thru 36,
201-084-1 thru 37, and 201-072-1 thru 7 and 12.
TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 -
C. T. K., INC. - A request for a time extension
for a residential subdivision of 22 single
family lots on 10.81 acres of land in the Low
Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre), located at the southwest corner of
Highland Avenue and Jasper Street - APN: 201-
212-12.
C. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-12 -
............. D~VIES - A'~r~quest for a time extension for the
development of Phases II and III of an
industrial complex, containing six industrial
buildings totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2
acres of land in the General Industrial
District, (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located on Feron Boulevard, east
of Helms Avenue - APN: 209-031-87 and 88.
Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A
public hearing on the Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tentative
Tract 14475, a residential subdivision and
design review of 71 single family residences on
113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential
(less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open
Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue
between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN:
200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Staff recommends
certification of the Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report. (Continued from August 12,
1992.)
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA
INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision and
design review of 71 single family residences on
113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential
(less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open
Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue
between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN:
200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated Tree
Removal Permit No. 92-06. (Continued from
August 12, 1992.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 92-23 - SMART SMR - The development of
an unmanned radio dispatch facility for mobile
communications consisting of a 75-foot pole and
antenna and 200 square feet of equipment
storage within an existing building in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10700
Jersey Boulevard - APN: 209-144-83. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-24 - RANCHO HILLS
COMMUNITY CHURCH - The request to establish a
church in a 6,500 square foot leased space
within an existing 65,000 square foot building
on 6.6 acres of land in the Office Professional
District, located at 7365 Carnelian Street,
Suite 217 - APN: 207-031-27.
TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 - LYON
COMPANY (FORMERLY AKINS) - A request for a time
extension and modification to conditions of
approval for a previously approved County tract
map consisting of 182 lots on 117 acres of
land, located north of Summit Avenue and east
of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226-082-24, 25,
and 26.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 14376 - TONG-TAI INVESTMENT, INC. - The
creation of a single 0.39 net acre parcel of
land for condominium purposes within the Medium
Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per
acre), Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner
of Rancheria Drive and Red Hill Country Club
Drive - APN: 207-123-05. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related
File: Variance 92-05.
VARIANCE 92-05 - WU - A request to allow a
reduction of the required interior site
boundary setback from 15 to 10 feet, and a
reduction in the number of required on-site
recreational amenities from three to one for a
proposed 4-unit detached condominium
development located on 0.39 acres within the
Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling
units per acre), Subarea 1 of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the
northwest corner of Rancheria Drive and Red
Hill Country Club Drive - APN: 207-123-05.
Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 14376.
VII .
VIII.
IX.
X.
New Business
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 92-08 - WESTERN PROPERTIES -
The review of a detailed site plan and
elevations for Phase III of Terra Vista Town
Center, consisting of two restaurants totaling
15,000 square feet and three retail buildings
totaling 20,688 square feet, located on the
north side of Foothill Boulevard between Aspen
and Spruce Avenues - APN: 1077-421-73, 74 and
76.
Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
Commission Business
Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
......... "':',, '.
0 C
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 23, 1992
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner.
DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 - GREYSTONE -
The design review of building elevations and detailed site
plan for 87 lots (Phases 1 and 2) of a previously approved
vesting tract map consisting of 165 single family lots on
40 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) located on the north side of
Highland Avenue, south of Banyan Avenue and west of Deer
Creek Channel - APN: 201-092-1 thru 36, 201-084-1 thru 37,
and 201-072-1 thru 7 and 12.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
Ae
Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of building elevations and
plot plans.
B. Project Density: 4.13 dwelling units per acre.
CO
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Vacant (approved Vesting Tentative Tract 13890, Phases 3
and 4); Low-Meditun Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre)
South - Highland Avenue (eventual Route 30 Freeway) and single
family residences; Low-Medium Residential District (4-8
dwelling units per acre)
East - San Bernardino County Flood Control (Deer Creek Channel);
Flood Control
West - North of Lemon Avenue - single family residential; Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), south
of Lemon Avenue - Apartments; Medium-High Residential
(14-24 dwelling units per acre)
Dm
Site Characteristics: The site is Phases 1 and 2 of approved
Vesting Tentative Tract 13890, which consists of 40-2 acres. The
site is presently vacant and slopes uniformly to the southwest, at
5 to 6 percent. Vegetation on the site is limited to native brush
and grasses with animal life consisting of rodents and native
birds- The site has been rough graded and partially improved with
streets, curb and gutter-
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR FOR VTT 13890 - GREYSTONE
September 23, 1992
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
General: Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 was originally approved by
the Planning Commission on June 8, 1988. At the time of approval,
the applicant (Acacia) proposed four floor plans, each with three
elevations, for the 165 lots. The homes ranged in size from 1,685
to 2,162 square feet. A mix of one and two-story elevations was
provided.
A Design Review application for Phases 1 and 2 was submitted by
Homestead Development in 1989 and approved by the Planning
Commission on August 9, 1989. The applicant submitted four floor
plans, each with three elevations. The homes ranged in size from
2,257 to 2,919 square feet. All of the floor plans were
two-story. Four models were constructed on Lots 18-21 along the
south tract boundary, but the remainder of the project was never
constructed and subsequently sold to Greystone Homes.
The submittal by Greystone Homes consists of one and two-story
models ranging in size from 1,'01 to 2,537 square feet. Four floor
plans, each having three elevations have been proposed.
Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 as well as the previous Design Review
proposed by Homestead Development both received a one-year time
extension by the Planning Comnission on August 12, 1992.
The vesting map was originally approved when side yard setbacks for
the Low-Medium District were 5 feet on each side. Since the date
of original approval, the Development Code has been amended to
increase side yard setbacks in this District to 5 and 10 feet. The
applicant, however, has vesting rights with this application and
the original setbacks of 5 feet on each side still apply. The
applicant has, in most instances, proposed side yard setbacks well
in excess of the minimum requirement. Where feasible, the larger
of the two side yard setbacks have been provided at the garage side
of the lot to allow vehicular access to the rear yard.
Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Vallette,
Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the project on July 16, 1992, and did
not approve it, but requested that the following modifications be
reviewed by the Committee prior to scheduling for Planning
Commission:
More movement should be provided for the building footprints
through the use of enhancements such as, but not limited to,
bay windows and kitchen nooks.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR FOR VTE 13890 - GREYSTONE
September 23, 1992
Page 3
More architectural detailing should be provided for each of
the elevations. For example: the size of the vents at the
roof peaks are out of scale. Greater detail could be provided
for the louvers, shutters, and fasicas while still keeping
within the style of the proposed architecture-
3. =There should be more variation i~ front yard setback.
A section/elevation of all walls should be provided. Caps on
top of the walls, colors, materials, and height should be
indicated on the details-
If possible, some of the houses should be reverse plotted on
the lots in order to pair driveways and provide larger areas
for continuously landscaped front yards- This may not be
feasible due to the location of existing curb-cuts, but the
possibility should be discussed with Planning and Engineering
staff-
The applicant met with staff to try and resolve the outstanding
architectural issues. The revised drawings were presented to the
Design Review Committee (McNiel, Vallette, Buller) on August 4,
1992. The Con~nittee (McNiel, Vallette, Buller) did not initially
feel comfortable with the level of modifications proposed by the
applicant. However, after review of the originally approved
elevations which were completed by Homestead Development, the
Committee reconsidered their decision. The Con~nittee then directed
staff to carefully compare the level of detail provided in this
application with that provided in the model complex constructed by
Homestead. Staff was directed to forward the project to the
Planning Commission if the level of detail was considered adequate
or became adequate following minor revisions by the applicant. If
not satisfied with the proposal, staff was told to return the
project to the Design Review Committee-
Staff and the applicant met on August 18, 1992, to address the
remaining architectural issues- The applicant responded to the
concerns of the Committee by undulating the footprints of the one-
story elevations (Plans 1 and 2), providing larger vent details,
enlarging the size of rafter tails, and adding additional
banding. On the two-story elevations (Plans 3 and 4), the garage
has been popped out, vent details enlarged, and additional stucco
banding added. The footprint of the two-story elevations has also
been provided with more movement along the rear elevation. These
details have been indicated in the attached Exhibits "F" and "G."
Staff feels that the level of architectural detail is acceptable.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code
and the General Plan. The project, with the recommended mitigation
measures, will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR FOR VTT 13890 - GREYSTONE
September 23, 1992
Page 4
significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and
City standards.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the Design Review for Phases 1 and 2 (87 lots) of Vesting Tentative
Tract 13890 through adoption of. the attached-Resolution of Approval..
BB:BN:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Rough Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Tract Map
Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "G" - Architectural Details
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
/ ,f--,tACT NO. 13890' ~-,.
/ SITE UTILIZATION MAP \\
/ \
/ : \
/
/ .-.- ,, ~.....:. \
................ \
, ...
' I- ....""-': i'::'//"'-" :~'~.:'.i" '
' :~ ' ' .......
: t , .._:L .-,: ~t:.:_
t ' L.:_:: ..... ,~L-L'; ~' ': ' - ,' · .......... "'
'-'; - .~...':-.-::-"', L..,: 7..:.:.:.--,--
'1.7 \ ' ""~' "' '~ ....' ' ' ""
CITY
OF RANCHO,,,CUCAMONGA
PLANNING-DMSION ,,
ITEM: ~la- I~0
TITLE:
EXHIBFF:'D,' I SCALE:
/X
(" ':"" 'f, ;, ~:""-i
O~ RANCHO,-, CUCAMONGA
PLANNING-DMSION
ITEM: P~- 13H~t' 0
TITLE: ~l'f~ [P'f~-~
E~~:~-~ SCALE:
CITY
OF RANCHO:.:.CUCAMONGA
PLANNING-. DMSION
ITEM:
TITLE:
EXHIBIT: t~-5 SCALE:
OF RANCHO,, CUCAMONGA
PLANNING. DMSION
ITEM:
TITLE:
EXHIBIT: e".4. SCALE:
CITY
PLANNING-DIVISION .,
TITLE: ~OO(at..I
EXHIBIT: C./"{ SCALE:
/q -/0
ITEM: I~R- ~ i~'~10
TITLE: p~3/.-H r-~P^~IIO6Pt,~
E~B~: C -~ SCALE:
~ -//
CITY
OF RANEHO.'~CUCAMONGA
PLANNING-DMSION
/~ -15
CH~
OF RANCHO,.:CUCAMONGA
PLANNING. Dr~S~ON
ITEM: DIZ I~q O
TITLE: b-~-~ ~A~OIw
EXHIBIT: ~"1 SCALE:
/~ -/q
oF
· - .?.
PLANNING. DMSION
TITLE: [~,~--~/::~t~_ F~ .~:l~
EXHIBrr: ~-'~.- SCALE:
CITY OF . ......., UCAMONGA TITLE: TI~.Ar-..T ISlthf~
PLANI~INCr.. DMSION
-"'" .
EXHIBIT: g SCALE:
/~-/7
u
//
Z
<
/~/
<
u
0
<
~q -23
Z
~ 0
<
>- 0
> Z
<
0
<
~ u
Z
o
<
>~ 0
~ z
A-~I
12"x24"x2" STUCCO RECESS
(SECONDARY COLOR
- rr. :!"'8:
1 "x RECESS
(SECONDARY COLOR)
OF R,A~CNC),,CUCAMONGA
PLANNING. DMSION
ZTEM: Pla
TITLE: ~ i~r-'rVP,~e
EXHIBIT: 6-1 SCALE:
A-33
(2) 12"x24" MASONITE SHUTTERS
(ACCENT CO
· · ·
,,, ................................
' .:~"" "~i ' '-7-. ~
.:9'--- -'-- -
""" ""~N,,,, STUCCO DETAIL
(SECONDARY COLOR:
~18"x24"x4" STUCCO RECESS -(PRIMARY COLOR)
PLAN 1C
STUCCO RECESS STUDY
""'" · "' G':.I
CITY OF RANCHO,,..CUCA_MONGA
PLANNING-DMSION
ITEM:
TITLE: t~f.r..4411-~r.rt~,t~t
EXHIBIT:~-.-~ SCALE:
/q -35e
16"x16"x2" STUCCO RECESS
(SECONDARY COLOR)
F
I
4" RECESS, 4" WIDE
OPEN TO PORCH
· ,,l ·
PLAN 2A
OF
PLANNING-. DMSION
' · I~?,"""",~ 1~.
- _ ~....----,,,_. 'j --~_ . :
r:
2"x6" SI~I(50TH'TOP'~ 2"~2" "" O.C.
1"x4" VERTICAL
PORCH STUDY
· ,' ~' "'\,,.,,
..... . .:. ,,;,;~
...... '--' .;',:7' ~."'.
RANCHO, ,CUCA.MONGA
~TEM: pIP-. !~"~"l 0
TFFLE:~:.t-tlTr-r'~U~C.
Ex'Hmrr:~---~ SCALE:
A
STUCCO DETAIL
(SECONDARY COLOR
·
ee
~,,,2"x6" WOOD "PRIM
· W/STUCCO OVER
i
CITY
PLAN 3A
OF
PLANNING-. DIVISION
REAR ELEVATION STUCCO DETAIL @ VENT
· ,', . ~" ',\,,,
..... . ,.' ~;,,;~
..... "' ", :';" )" ,~ ITEM: Pl~
RANCHO, ,CUCAMONGA
TITLE: I~O-,"-H
EXHrBIT: ~'4' SCALE:
~4 -5~
16"x16"x2" STUCCO RECESS
(SECONDARY COLOR)
/ 2"x12" WOOD TRIM W/STUCCO OVER.
................FEATURE WINDOW STUDY
-\
ITEM: ~ 1~41~'~
EXHOrt: ~-~ SCALE:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW OF
BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 87 LOTS
(PHASES 1 AND 2) OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VESTING TRACT
13890, CONSISTING OF 165 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 40 ACRES
OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF BANYAN AVENUE AND WEST OF DEER
CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 201-092-01 THROUGH 36, 201-084-01 THROUGH 37, AND
201-072-01 THROUGH 07 AND 12.
A. Recitals.
(i) Greystone Homes, Inc. has filed an application for the approval
of Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13890 as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter the subject Design Review request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 23rd day of September 1992, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and
concluded said meeting on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, astermined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on September 23, 1992, including written
and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application contemplates the development of four floor
plans, consisting of one- and two-story models, each having three elevations,
on 87 lots; and
(b) The proposed elevations have
architecture consistent with the City guidelines.
been designed with
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
,q
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 13890 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.
September 23, 1992
Page 2
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of
the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin~ Division
1)
The freeway sound wall shall be consistent with
that which has been provided for Tract 13823 to
the west. Pilasters with a decorative cap
shall be located between Lots 17 and 18 and
between Lots 20 and 21 and at property
boundaries.
2)
Return walls shall be of stucco material and
may be offset at the property line. Some type
of pilaster may be located at the property
line.
3)
The perimeter wall shall be compatible and
consistent with Tract 12873 to the west. When
the wall is constructed, it shall be designed
to minimize any potential double wall, wall
relocation, or grade differential conflicts
that may result with the project to the west
when it is constructed. This shall be
indicated on the final landscape plan which
shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to issuance of building permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 13890 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.
September 23, 1992
Page 3
4)
The rear wall of Lot 1 shall be inset
approximately 15 feet from the property line
and shall intersect the corner side yard wall
at an approximate 30 degree angle. The same
treatment shall apply to Lot 52. The resultant
triangular piece of land adjacent to the curb
shall be annexed into a Landscape Maintenance
District. This shall be indicated on the final
landscape plan which shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and City Engineer
prior to the issuance of building permits.
5)
All return fences/walls in public view shall be
decorative in nature and subject to approval by
the Design Review Committee. Said fences/walls
shall be indicated on the final landscape
plans.
6)
Lots adjacent to the Medium-High Residential
project to the west are to be screened from it
with a dense planting of evergreen trees along
the eastern side or the perimeter wall. This,
as well as a permanent irrigation system, shall
be noted on the final landscape plans which
shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner.
7)
Where possible, greater variation shall be
provided in the front setback to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
Encineerinu Division
l)
The developer shall provide a secondary means
of access for Phase II from the northerly
termination of "G" Street to meet existing
pavement on Banyan Avenue to the north or
Chandon Place to the west.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 13890 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.
September 23, 1992
Page 4
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
cucamonga,..do .hereby certify that .~he foregoing Resplution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 23rd day of September 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT
SUBJECT:
Those items checked are Conditions of Approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. TIme LImits
1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of
I /.__
/ /
The developer shall commenoe, participate in, and consunvnme orcause to be commenced,
participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the devek:q~er shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map occurs.
Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes
first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos
Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school distrial has previously established such a Community
Facilities District. the applicant shall, in the aitemmive, consent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school
district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
/ /
/ /__
O
Co~p|~uo~ D,.tc
This condition shall be waned if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
impacts as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to fi hal map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
1. The sife shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans. architectural elevations. extedor materials and colors. landscaping. sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations'are
~cific Ran &, ,J
· Rantted Cemmunity.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
X' 4.
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street irrl)rovement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency pnorto issuance of any permits (Such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced. whichever comes first.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development
Code, ad other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
/ / ¸
/
/ /.~
/ /__
,
10.
If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units
with all receptacles shielded from public view.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations,
and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
All ground-mounted utility apfxJrtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls. berming. and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
X
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control. in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
alltrails, includingfencing.and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amandmants to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17.
Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures. fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and
similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18.
The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No.
. Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal o! landmark
trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and approval.
C. Building Design
An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy s~ems are'
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural
treatment. detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to C~ Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
/
/ /__
/ /.__
/ /
/ /__
/
/ /
/ /~
/ /
/ /.~
C_~:~nplcuon Date:
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for _,j ,
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof appudenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propedies and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans)
All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwe Ilings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
/ /
/ /__
All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles,
entrances, and exits shall be stdped per City standards.
All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in
depth from back of sidewalk.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdorto issuance of building
permits.
E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape arm, refer to Section N.)
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap-
ing in the case of residential development, Shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and submitted for City Ranner review and approval priorto the issuance of building
permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barder
in accordance with the Mu nicipat Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods.
A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following s~zes, shall be provided
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon.
/ /.__
/ /
4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees -
24-inch box or larger.
5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
· /_
'2/91 4
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum. irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
All private slopes in excess of 5 feet. but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy.
o
For single family residential development. all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu-
ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory
condition.
10.
For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen-
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11.
Front yard landscaping shall be
street trees and slope planting.
required per the Development Code and/or
· This requirement shell be in addition to the required
12.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls. landscaping. and sidewalks shall be
included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock. specimen size trees. meander-
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along
Co~pleuo~ Dat~
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
/
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shell be continuously maintained by the developer.
15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
16.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and
al:~roval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shell encourage the natural
growth c.~aracleristics of the selected tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
/ /__
/
2/91
F. Signs
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division pdor to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway
project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided,
and if al~ropdate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencies
'~ 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District Standards.
2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance lree and clear, a minimum of 26 leer wide
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for
fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system.
4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Muiti-tamily residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail L .~xes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
Date-:
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /__
/ /
/ /__
/ /
/ /
! /
X 5.
SC - 2/91
For projects using septic tank facilities, wdtlen certification of acceptability, including all
supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Site Development
The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Cede, Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applicable handouts.
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but am not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
X
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or
addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structure~
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be made to cornply with correct building and zoning regulations for
the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal fadlities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the
Uniform Plurn~ing Code and Uniform Building Code.
4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for
building permit application.
K. Grading
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the apCHovad grading plan.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calitomia to
pedorm such work.
The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance
Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714)
387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitled to the City
pnor to the issuance of rough grading permit.
5C-2/91
,
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at
the time of application for grading plan check.
5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
Completion Dat~:
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /.__
/ /
/ /
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
/
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 23, 1992
STAFF REPORT
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K., INC. - A
residential subdivision of 22 single family lots on 10.81
acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Highland
Avenue and Jasper Street - APN: 201-212-12.
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission approved
Tentative Tract 14072 for the creation of 22 sLngle family parcels-
Conditions of approval for the project require the applicant to work
with the Federal Emergency Managemint Agency (FEMA) to remove the Flood
Zone "A" designation (area of 100-year flood) from the project area.
During the past two years, the applicant has supplied FEMA with the
required drainage and hydrology information to support removal of the
project from the Flood Zone "A" designation. Just recently, the
applicant received confirmation from FEMA that the Flood Zone Map has
been revised to eliminate the Zone "A" designation. Because the
applicant did not have sufficient time to prepare the final plans
following FEMA's map revision, they have requested a one-year time
extension-
Under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, tentative maps are
approved for an initial period of two years. Time extensions may be
granted in one-year increments for a maximum of three years beyond the
original approval period- The time extension requested will be the
first of the possible three years-
ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the tentative tract map extension request
and compared the proposal with the criteria outlined in the Development
Code. In that no amendments to the Low Residential standards have been
processed in the last two years, the proposed subdivision remains in
compliance with the Low Residential designation. Additionally, the
project is in conformance with the Low Residential designation of the
General Plan.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make the following findings
before approving this application:
A. That there have been no significant changes to the Land Use Element
of the General Plan, the Development Code, or the character of the
ITEM B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 14072 - CTK, INC.
September 23, 1992
Page 2
area within which the project is located that would cause the
approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming; and
B. That the granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a
one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 14072 through adoption of
the attached Resolution.
· Respect submi_t_~ted,
BB:SM/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading
Resolution No. 90-115 Approving TT 14072
Resolution of Approval
C.Y.K., Ir c.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
9640 Center Avenue, Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730-5809
(714) 941-1903
7 iBIgi,IOiRI]ZI:Li i314-15
July 28, 1992
~he City Of Rancho' Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Dr.
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attention: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
Reference: Tentative Tract No. 14072
Gentlemen:
Tentative Tract No. 14072 was approved by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Commission on September 12, 1990. We are
requesting that the Planning Commission extend this approval for an
additional one year.
We have submitted and received back from the Engineering and
Grading Departments the first submittal of the final plans. We are
presently working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(F.E.M.A.) on establishing new boundary lines for the flood plain
along Jasper Street.
Also, the poor economic picture throughout the Country for the
past two years has curtailed our client, Southland Development
Corporation, from starting a new project of this magnitude.
However, it does appear it has "bottomed out" and we look forward
to a significant change in the next twelve months.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter and we look
forward to a favorable reply on this request.
Very truly yours,
Carl T. Kobbins, Jr.
President ,//.
CTK/ccc
CC: D. Gordon Dreisbach,
Southland Development Corp.
CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DMSION
ITEM: ~ L4'O'T, 'q...-
TiTLE:j/!.,~- ~,X L/~?,-/k~',,~
EXHIBrT: SCALE:
I
0
CI:
<
0
Z
0
RESOLUTION NO. 90-115
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 14072, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 22 LOTS ON
10.81 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE AND JASPER STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-212-12.
A. Recitals.
(i) C.T.K. Inc. has filed an application for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 14072 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 12th of September, 1990, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 12, 1990, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street with a street frontage
of approximately 895 feet along Highland Avenue and a lot depth of 345 feet
and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is zoned
for residential uses. The property to the north contains single family
residences, the property to the east contains single family residences that
are currently under construction, the property to the west contains a church,
and the property to the south is designated for the future Foothill Freeway;
and
(c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval
complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC.
September 12, 1990
Page 2
90-115
(d) The proposed development of 22 single family lots on 10.81
acres of land is consistent with the Low Residential land use designation of
the General Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specific plans; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed; and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not 1 ikely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife
or their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
heal th problems; and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division:
(1)
Prior to the recordation of the final map or the
issuance of building permits, whichever comes first,
the applicant shall consent to, or participate in,
the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District pertaining to the project site to
provide in conjunction with applicable school
district for the construction and maintenance of
necessary school facilities. However, if any school
district has previously established such a Community
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-115
TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC.
September 12, 1990
Page 3
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the
alternative, consent to the annexation of the project
site into the territory of such existing district
prior to the recordation of the final map or the
issuance of building permits, whichever comes
first. Further, if the affected school district has
not formed a Mello-Roos Co. mmunity Facilities District
-within twelve months of 'the date'of approval of the
project and prior to the recordation of the final map
or issuance of building permits for said project,
this condition shall be deemed null and void.
(2)
Decorative bloc k wal 1 s shal 1 be requi red along
Highland Avenue and all corner side yards consistent
with Tracts 12820 and 13727 to the east. The
location and design of the walls shall be shown on
the final Landscape Plan subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits.
(3)
A sound wall, as required the the acoustical analysis
shall be installed along the south tract boundary.
The wall shall be designed consistent with the sound
wall provided for Tracts 12820 and 13727.
(4)
The drainage overflow area, east of Lot 22, shall be
landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Planner
and City Engineer. The proposed 1 andsca pe
improvements for the overflow area shall be shown on
the Landscape Plan.
(s)
A final acoustical analysis shall be required to
identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce the
noise level within the residences to 45 CNEL. The
report shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
Engineering Division:
(1) A permit will be required from M.W.D. for any work
within their right-of-way.
(2) Install "No Stopping Any Time" signs along the
Hi ghl and Avenue frontage.
(3)
Caltrans shall deed the excess state property at the
southwest portion of the site to the Developer prior
to recordation of the final map.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-115
TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC.
September 12, 1990
Page 4
(4)
Provide sufficient catch basin capacity upstream
within Jasper Street so that a total QIO0 is
contained within the pipe south of Highland Avenue.
(5) The drainage overflow area east of Lot 22 shall be
reconstructed and landscaped for City maintenance to
the satisfaction of the City E..ngineer. The overflow
' capacity shall be limited to the capacity of the most
downstream sump catch basin. Also, openings in the
south wall shall be provided for drainage.
(6)
It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have
the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the
project area. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare
all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic
calculations, etc. Preliminary approval shall be
obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the record
map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first. The designation shall be officially removed
prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance,
whichever occurs first.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990.
cNi el, Chai ~an
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of September 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
-10
d
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14072, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
OF 22 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 10.81 ACRES OF LAND IN THE
LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND
JASPER STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 201-212-12.
A. Recitals
(i) CTK, Inc. has filed an application for the extension of
Tentative Tract No. 14072 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred
to as "the application."
(ii) On September 12, 1990, the Commission adopted Resolution No.
90-115 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 14072.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. That prevailing economic conditions
distressed market climate for development of the project.
have caused a
b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions
make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time.
c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the
Development Code.
d. That the granting of said time extension will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 14072 - CTK, INC.
September 23, 1992
Page 2
Tract Applicant Expiration
14072 CTK, Inc. September 12, 1993
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution. ~,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1992.
~LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 23rd day of September 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 23, 1992
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner
TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-12 - DAVIES - A
request for a time extension for the development of Phases II
and III of an industrial complex, containing six industrial
buildings totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2 acres of land in
the General Industrial District, (Subarea 3) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Feron Boulevard,
east of Helms Avenue - APN 209-031-87 and 88.
BACKGROUND: The request for approval of six industrial buildings on
Feron Boulevard and Helms Avenue was originally reviewed by the Planning
Commission on April 11, 1990. At that meeting, the Planning Commission
reviewed several outstanding design issues, since the applicant was not
in agreement with Desi~ Review Committee recommendations. The request
was continued to April 25, 1990, in order to allow the Commission
members that reviewed the project during Design Review the opportunity
to hear the item. One of the major issues discussed at the
April 25, 1990, meeting was the utilization of slumpstone block which
was used on the first phase of the project- The item was denied by the
Planning Commission and was subsequently appealed to the City Council by
the applicant.
The appeal was heard by the City Council on June 20, 1990. At that
meeting, staff requested, with the consent of the applicant's attorney,
to continue the public hearing to July 18, 1990, in order to allow time
to meet with the applicant and work out a solution to the outstanding
architectural, site planning, and landscaping issues. Staff and the
applicant worked out a compromise which allowed for slumpstone block to
be used in all buildings of Phases II and III, which would keep the
design of all the buildings consistent. In return, the applicant agreed
to certain architectural, site plan, and landscape upgrades consistent
with the original Design Review Comittee recommendations. The
applicant's proposal addressed all but one of the original Design Review
concerns, that being the use of slumpstone block. The applicant's
proposal did include a new building design for a portion of Phase II and
all of Phase III which was different in appearance and approved in
comparison with the existing buildings in Phase I- This revised project
was finally approved by the City Council on August 1, 1990, for a
two-year .period ending August 1, 1992.
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 89-12 - DAVIES
September 23, 1992
Page 2
Since the time of approval by the City Council on August 1, 1990, the
applicant has proceeded through both the grading plan check and building
plan check process. Grading permits were issued on February 27, 1992,
although no work has con~nenced on the site. Building permits were
approved for issuance by the Planning Division on August 13, 1991,
although they were never is~ued.~ The Planning Con~nission may gran~ ~p
to three one-year extensions-
ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the time extension request and the
Development Review file for compliance with the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, the Development Code, and the General Plan. The project is
consistent with technical requirements such as setbacks and landscaping
and design requirements as defined by the Industrial Area Specific Plan
for Subarea 3- At the time of approval in 1990, all applicable
development standards, consistent with the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, were applied to the project.
However, since the time of approval, the Industrial Area Specific Plan
has been amended to eliminate compact parking stalls- At the time of
approval, 35 percent of all required parking was permitted to be
compact. The following parking tabulation was applied to the project at
the time or approval.
Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Phase I Office
Buildings E-H
Light Manufacturing
2,120 1/250 8 8
10,785 1/500 22 24
Phase III Office
Buildings J & K
1,060 1/250 4 4
7,405 1/500 14 14
Total
18 18
Phase II provided a total of six compact spaces and Phase III provided a
total of six compact spaces- The compact spaces have been highlighted
in Exhibits "B" and "C." However, since grading permits have already
been issued and since the Planning Division has authorized issuance of
building permits, it would be difficult to require an adjustment in the
parking layout at this time- Additionally, only one or two compact
stalls could be eliminated-
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 89-12 - DAVIES
September 23, 1992
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a
one-year time extension for Development Review 89-12 through adoption of
the attached Resolution of Approval.
BB:BN:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Phase II Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Phase III Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Master Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "H" - Resolution No. 90-238
Resolution of Approval
ALlBERT DAVIES, IlqC.
GENERAl ENG|NEER|NG CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR LICENSE # SA 370846
87:17 HELMS AVENUE · POST OFFICE BOX 215
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91
(714) 989-3714 FAX: (714) 989-O754
July 30, 1992
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drlve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Brad Bullet
Planning Department
Re: DR 89-12, Davies Industrial Park
Phase II &III
Dear Brad.
It has ]ust come to my attention that the above Development
Rev!ew has an explratlon date, August l, 1992. That being the
case I am requestlng an'extension of time for that approval.
The economlc times combined with other difficulties has taken
longer than orlglnal time allowed. You should note that the off-
s~te improvements have had the bonds completed, permlts pulled
and pamd, and work stated, all based on the approved DR 89-12.
Times being what they are please grant the longest tlme possible
for the extenslon.
~ ),-
~ j
##
C
, %
, }
!
d. -/I
C.-/z.-
,', OOO~oooo' -- 0'-:' ,-~-~
RESOLUTION NO. 90-238
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.
89-12, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONTAIN-
ING SIX INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 22,940 SQUARE FEET
ON 2.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,
SUBAREA 3 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON
FERON BOULEVARD.,. EAST OF HELMS AVENUE
A. Recitals.
(i) Albert W. Davies has filed an application for the approval of
Development Review No. 89-12 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 11th day of April, 1990, and continued to the 25th day
of April, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted meetings on the application.
(iii) On April 25, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted its
Resolution No. 90-52, thereby denying Development Review No. 89-12 providing
for the development Qf an industrial complex continuing six industrial
buildings on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial District {Subarea 3}.
(iv) The Planning Commission's denial of the application was
appealed by the applicant within the established time limit.
(v) On June 6, 1990, and continued to June 20, 1990, the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings
to hear an appeal on the application.
(vi) On June 20, 1990, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the application and continued that hearing to July 18, 1990,
in order to allow time for the applicant and staff to resolve the outstanding
project issues.
(vii) On July 18, 1990, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the application and continued that hearing to August 1,
1990, in order to allow time for rev. ised plans and a Resolution of Approval to
be completed.
(viii) On August 1, 1990, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date.
(ix) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
F X /v / F JY' I
C-
Resol uti on No. 90-238
Page 2
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on August 1, 1990, including written and
oral staff reports, together with publ i c testimony, this Counci 1 hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on Feron
Avenue, east of Helms Avenue with street frontages of 151.67 feet for Phase II
and 154.88 feet for Phase III and lot depth of 393.48 feet and 222.56 feet
respectively, and is presently unimproved; and
(b} The property to the north of the subject site i s an
orchard, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3; the property to the south
of the site consists of A.T. & S.F. Railroad, zoned Industrial Specific Plan,
Subarea 3; the property to the east is vacant, zoned Industrial Specific Plan,
Subarea 3; and the property to the west is a manufacturing and construction
service yard and office, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3.
(c) The architecture, materials, and site plan meet the design
criteria established for that district within the Industrial Specific Plan and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158.
(d) The proposed architectural designs are compatible with
overall design goals of the General Plan.
(e) The revisions to the proposed plans are appropriate for
meeting the goals and design criteria of the General Plan and Industrial
Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Commission
and this Council during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific
findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby
finds and concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed project is in accord with the objectives
of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
1 ocated; and
Resol uti on No. 90-238
Page 3
(c) That the proposed project is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed project with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Council finds and certifies that the project has been
reviewed and considered in compliance with the ~_California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, and' further, this' Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
A. Planning Division.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance
with the approved site plan, which includes architectural
elevations, exterior material and colors, landscaping and
grading on file with the Planning Division, the conditions
contained herein, and the Industrial Specific Plan.
A Uniform Sign Program shall be submitted for review and
approval by the City Planner. The design of the Uniform
Sign Program shall compliment the architectural program.
The sign program shall include all on-site signage
including monument signs, wall signs, and directional
signs.
All site amenities including furniture, benches, trash
receptacles, light fixtures, etc., shall be of a tradi-
ti onal design to bl end with the archi tecture. Sample
designs and specifications shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
Extensive landscaping, including densely planted evergreen
trees, shall be provided along the south boundary of Phase
Two. The species, size, and spacing of the trees shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance
of bui 1 di ng permits.
Landscape planters shall be incorporated on the sides of
buildings, where possible, for plants to soften the base of
walls and silhouette the sides of the buildings.
Resol uti on No. 90-238
Page 4
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Large, minimum 36 inch box, trees shall be provided,
flanking the project entries.
The final landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
A final precise grading plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance
of any permits.-
A final certified photometric lighting diagram showing
luminary throw patterns and cut sheets of luminaries,
including details of all lighting fixtures shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
That a smooth plaster band shall be provided continuous
around the buildings with the exception of door and glass
locations and that a textured beam with two by trellis and
painted smooth plaster finish shall be provided at the
building entrances.
That the roof drain pipes shall be architecturally treated.
That "enriched paving" shall be provided at driveway
entrances and pedestrian crossings within the parking lot.
That final samples of the building materials and colors,
including concrete interlocking paver, be submitted to the
Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance
of building permits.
That the trash enclosures and al 1 site wal 1 s shal 1 be
architecturally treated to emulate the buildings and that
the trash enclosures be constructed per City standards to
include rollup doors and overhead trellis.
That the proposed industrial development shall conform to
all applicable standard conditions.
Approval shall ex. pire, unless extended by the City Planner,
if building permits are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within twenty-four (24} months from the date of
approval.
C- 7
Resol uti on No. 90-238
Page 5
17.
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial
or industrial development, the applicant shall pay develop-
ment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,
but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage
Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
18.
The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform
Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing
Code, National Electric Code, and al.l other applicable
'codes, proposed ..t'rdinances"and regulations in effect at the
time of issuance of relative permits.
B. Engineering Division·
Feron Boulevard shal 1 be constructed ful 1 curb to curb
width with either phase.
Landscaping within the "Limited Use Areas" for the drive-
ways shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
The reciprocal emergency access easement on the adjacent
property shall be provided prior to the issuance of build-
ing permits for Phase II and Phase III.
4. Exis.ting Overhead Utilities·
Communication lines within the A.T. & S.F. Railroad
right-of-way - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the
future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities
shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of
building permits for Phase II. The fee shall be one-
half the City adopted unit amount times the length
from the westerly property 1 i ne to the easterly
property 1 i ne.
Communication lines on the south side of Eighth Street
- An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future under-
grounding of existing overhead utilities shall be paid
to the City prior to the issuance of building permits
for Phase II, The fee shall be one-half the City
adopted unit amount times the length from the westerly
property line to the easterly property line,
c, The amount of the fees shall not exceed as follows:
1, RxR Communication Lines
2, 8th Street Communication Lines
TOTAL
$2,505.00
$7,097.50
$9,602.50
Resol uti on No. 90-238
Page 6
Trees shall not be planted within the Cucamonga County
Water District sewer easements nor shall they be planted
within the northerly 14 feet of the 20-foot wide City storm
drain easement along the south property line, because they
will have to be removed in the future upon installations of
the storm drain 1 i he.
PASSED, ApPROVED~-and-ADOPIED this' t.~t day of August, 1990.
Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
e~6~)~nnisL. Stout, Mayo
ATTEST:
Ad~s~,City Cei~FCT~rk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of
August, 1990.
Executed this 2nd day of August, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
J.r A City Clerk