HomeMy WebLinkAbout85-146 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 85-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2,
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Raneho Cueamonga that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City
Engineer is required to ~ake and file with the City Clerk of the City an
annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected
to pay the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District No.
1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Landscape Maintenance District No. 4,
and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act,
which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and
every part thereof, and finds tha each and every part of said report is
sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be
modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Estimate of i~mized costs and
expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses
in connection therewith, contained in said report be,
and each ofthem are hereby preliminarily apprvoed and
confirmed.
2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts
referred to an described in said report, the
boundaries of the subdivisions of land withn said
Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions
of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to
the estimated benefit to be received by said
subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said
report is hereby preliminarily approved and
confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's
Annual Report for the fiscal year 1985-86 for the
purposes of all subsequent proceedings.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985.
AYES:
Wright, Buquet, Mikels, Dahl, King
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
Beverly/A. Authelet, City Clerk
Resolution No. 85-146
Page 2
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 15th
day of May, 1985.
Executed this 16th day of May, 1985 at Raneho Cucamonga, California.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Resolution No. 85-146
Page 3
CITY OF RANCliO CUCLMONGA
1985-86 Engineer's Report
for
Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 4 and 5
SECTION 1. A[FTHORITE FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1984-85 and the
estinmted assessments for Fiscal Year 1985-86 of the following maintenance
districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Ranthe Cueamonga.
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Areas to be included in the work program ar~ specifically defined in the
body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of
said Maintenance Districts are as follows:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
564,503 sq. ft., General City
Victoria Planned Community
Terra Vista Planned Community
Tr. 11915-1, Tot Lot & Open Sapce
Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of parkway
improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to
all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis.
In the case of eondominiams with airspace ownership only, and apartments,
a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as 1/2 a lot.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Parkway improvements were constructed by the developers for the individual
subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of
approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map of development plan and the
assessment diagram for the exact location of the parkway areas. The plans and
specifications for landscape improvement on the individual development are
hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and
specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement
of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation,
trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the
removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the
maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation
systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to
the cultivated areas.
Resolution No. 85-146
Page 4
No costs will be incurred for parkway initial landscaping improvement
construction. All initial improvenmts will be constructed by developers.
Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1985-
86 are as follows:
Landscape MaintenAnce ~strict ~. 1
1984-85 Estimated Assessment Costs
$.17 x 377,077 sq. ft. = $64,103.09
1984-85 Actual Cost Summary
Utilities $8,638.00
City Labor & Admin. 239.45
Contract Maint. 22,966.86
Weed Control 263.79
Actual assessment received ($48,549.88) less Actual Cost ($32,108.10) =
$ 16,441.78 for restoration.
1985-86 Estimated Assessment Cost
$.17 X 564,503 sq. ft. = $95,965.51
Total Assessable Lots 1985-86 = 1541 Single Family
2233 Multi-Family
Assessments: Single Family - $38.00 X 1541 = 58,558
Multi-Family - $19.00 X 2233 = 42,427
100,985
With this report the previous spread method is being amended. Only those
tracts which have begun building are being assessed. The spread method is as
follows: Single Family Unit = 1 Assessment Unit, Condominiums and Apartments
= 1/2 Assessment Unit. Proposed Assessment for 1985-86 is $38.00 per single
family unit and $19.00 per Condominium or Apartment unit.
B. Landscape Naintenance Distrlnt No. 2 (Victoria Planned Ccssaunity)
The estimated costfor Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts
11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 comprising 745 units is shown below:
Victoria Park Lane, 450,000 sq. ft. X $0.33/Sq. Ft. =
Trails and Parkways, 84,799 sq. ft. X $0.33/Sq. Ft. =
Trees, 745 X $5/Tree =
Parkway Reconstruction =
1985-86 Assessment
$166,708 divided by 745 units = $223.77
1851.55 vacant acres at 1/4 Assessment = $103,575.71
$135,000.00
$ 27,983.00
$ 3,725.00
$103,575.71
$270,253.71
Resolution No. 85-146
Page 5
C. Landscape Maintenance Distrtet No. ~ (Tetra Vista)
The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal
year 1985-86 involves 611 dwelling units of Tracts Nos. 12316, 12316-1, 12317,
12317-1, 12364, 12364-1, 12365, 12402, 12590-1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12590-4,
12590-5, and 12590-6 is as follows:
Parks 5 acres @ $5000/acre
Parkways & Gateways 135,579 S.F. at $0.35/s.f.
Trails & Greenway landscaping 26,935 S.F. at $0.35/s.f.
Medians 65,595 S.F. at $0.15/S.F.
Trees - 1257 at $5/each
Assessment units
Single family 425 d.u. x 1 unit =
Multifamily 422 d.u. x .5 unit =
847 d.u.
$25,000.00
$50,838.75
$ 9,840.25
$10,241.75
$ 6,285.00
$ 102,205.75
425 assessment units
211 assessment units
%'~assessment units
Estimated assessment rate = $ 102,205.75 divided by 636 = $160.70
D. Landcape Maintenance District ~o. 5
The estimated maintenance for 1985-86 for the 720,700 S.F. of open space
and the tot lot consisting of 3,300 S.F. for Landscape Maintenance District
No. 5 as follows:
Total Annual Miintenance of Open Space & Tot Lot
$.030 x 24,000 S.F. =
$7,200 divided by 44 units = $163.64
$7,200
SECTION 5 ~~ DIA(}~aM
A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagrama are attached to this
report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrama are
hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as
shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder.
(Assessment Diagrama are on file in the City Clerk's office).
TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1985-86:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 = 3,774
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 = 745
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 = 636
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 = 44
Resolution No. 85-146
Page 6
ammm~sTIOI ~ll~l (1984-85)
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
TRACT NO. OF UNITS
12386 54 P.H.
12332-1 53 S.F.
12238 74 S.F.
12530 4 S.F.
12523 35 S.F.
11577 7 S.F.
P.M. 7827 305
12320 60 Condos
12490 144 Condos
11606-1 44
10046 27
10047 43
12721 270 Condos
9619 31
12525 122 S.F.
12539
12540
12541
12091 248 Condos
11781 76 Condos
12772-1 20 S.F.
12621 90 T.H.
11625 102 Condos
12362 88 Condos
9539 19 S.F.
11893 35 S.F.
12801-1 33 S.F.
10035 38 S.F.
2022 units
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
TRACT
NO. OF UNITS
12590-1 29
12590-2 33
12590-3 23
12590-4 31
12590-5 32
12590-6 32
12365 270
~50
Improvemnts for the entire districts are found to be of general benefit to
all lots within each District and that assessment shall be equal for each
parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
appropriate District.
1985-86 ~B
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
$19.00 Condos. & Apts.
$38.00 S.F.
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
$103,575.71 Vacant Land
$223.77 S.F.
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
$154.10 per Assmr. Unit
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
$163.64 S.F.