The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001/02/21 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: IsT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. February 21, 2001 Agency, Board & City Council Members William' J. Alexander..: .........: .......Mayor Diane Willjams ...............Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane ...............................Member James V. Curatalo .....................Member Bob Dutton ..............................Member Jack Lam .........................City Manager James L. Markman .............City Attorney Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander ., Biane Curatalo __., Dutton __, and Willlares__ B._~, ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Introduction of newly assigned deputies: Detective Suzanne Cefalu, Deputy Michael Goodman, Deputy Felix Huaman, Deputy Claudia Morales, and Deputy Kathleen Oroa to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 2. Presentation by BUY.COM Inland Empire Open to Community Foundation, Library Foundation and youth programs. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the month of March as Red Cross Month. C.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This iS the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/31/01, 2/1/01, and 2/7/01 and '1 Payroll ending 2/11/01 for the total amount of $1,758,347.52. 2. Approval to receive and fi~e current Investment Schedule as of January 24 31,2001. 3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Arrow Route Cross-Gutter Removal west of Hellman and the Hellman 30 Avenue Drainage Improvements north of 9th Street, to be funded from Account Nos. 11763035650/1221-176 and 11763035650/1264-176. City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01-027 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE CROSS-GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9TM STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval of Automation Implementation Plan. 38 5. Approval of an Application for California Beverage Container Recycling 42 and Litter Reduction Annual Payment by the California Department of Conservation Division of Recycling. RESOLUTION NO. 01-028 44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITFER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING 6. Approval to appropriate $13,000 awarded by the California State Library 45 into Library expenditure account 12986015010. 7. Approval of a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of 46 Commerce for waiver of fees for use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on March 28, 2001 - April 2, 2001. 8. Approval to appropriate $557,510.00 from a prior year reserve, accept 48 the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $557,501.56 ($506,819.60 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Riverside Construction, Co., for the construction of the Civic Center East Parking Lot Expansion, to be funded from capital reserve funds, Account No. 1-025-001-5650-1300- 025. 9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and 58 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 00-13, located at 10370 Trademark Street, east of Center Avenue, submitted by Young Homes, LLC. City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01-029 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 00-13 RESOLUTION NO. 01-030 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-13 10. App:'oval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 70 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 00-27, located on the terminus of Monroe Court, north of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Housing Action Resource Trust. RESOLUTION NO. 01-031 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR MDR 00-27 RESOLUTION NO. 01-032 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 00-27 11. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities 82 Monumentation Cash Deposit, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract Map 16051 and Ordering to Summarily Vacate a 30-foot wide easement for general public and public utility purposes, located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Richmond American Homes of California, a Colorado Corporation. City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01-033 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND TRACT NO. 16051 RESOLUTION NO. 01-034 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16051 ° RESOLUTION NO. 01-035 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A 30-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR GENERAL PUBLIC AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE 12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, 98 Monumentation Cash Deposit, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 for Tract Map 14875 and located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Archibald Garden Villas Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 01-036 t 0t A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND TRACT MAP NO. 14875 '~ City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 5 RESOLUTION NO. 01-037 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT MAP 14875 13. Approval of a Lease Agreement (CO 00-011 ) between the City and the '109 Redevelopment Agency for the Development of a Parking Lot on Agency-owned property, APN: 203-352-72. 14. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 01-012) with LSA, 127 Inc., for the preparation of an environmental impact report for the Regional Center; Account No. 1001314 5303. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land use designation (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for churches. Relation file: Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45, and Preliminary Application Review 98-12. ORDINANCE NO. 652 (second reading) 128 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 17.32 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW CHURCHES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 4) AND TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR CHURCHES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON CHURCH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 6 ORDINANCE NO. 653 (second reading) 136 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON CHURCH STREET BETVVEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO 141 CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. ORDINANCE NO. 654 (first reading 149 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ROOFING MATERIALS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 156 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require the construction of storm drainage improvements on Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue for the development of a service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food service and a drive-thru self-service car wash on two acres of land located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - APN: 1100-161-002. (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 7, 2001) G~ PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. ~ City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 7 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.21 158 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SMOKIN~5 REGULATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 384A (first readinfi) I 71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.21 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OR PROHIBITION OF SMOKING AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE H.~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO MODIFY ETIWANDA 176 DRAINAGE FEE - PACIFIC COMMUNITIES I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. pARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 180 UPDATE 2. REPORT ON HERMOSA STORM DRAIN (ORAL REPORT) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K,_:. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda February 21, 2001 8 L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 15, 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37,--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check/~nount Type subs Rel To Note AP00164170 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 02/07/01 523.53 MW OH ====================================== AP00164171 006011 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLy INC 02/07/01 30.09 MW AP00164172 004347 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 02/07/01 625.70 MW OH CC AP00164173 003785 ACTION ART 02/07/01 838.73 MW AP00164174 000014 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCy 02/07/01 281.00 MW AP00164175 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 02/07/01 1,024.00 MW OH CC AP00164176 001295 ALAMO PAINTING 02/07/01 3,249.00 MW OH CC AP00164177 000017 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 02/07/01 411.82 MW AP00164178 001430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FOP~MS 02/07/01 1,792.34 MW AP00164179 001468 ANERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMy 02/07/01 60.00 MW OH AP00164180 002693 AMTECE ELEVATOR SERVICES 02/07/01 1,100.25 MW AP00164181 001291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 02/07/01 472.00 ~Sq AP00164182 000026 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 02/07/01 24,120.00 MW AP00164183 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 02/07/01 3,970.13 MW OH AP00164184 004102 B ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 02/07/01 268.61 MW AP00164185 004110 BABCOCK ~ SONS INC ES 02/07/01 448.00 NSq AP00164186 004475 BARNES ~ NOBLE 02/07/01 900.14 ~Sq AP00164187 021765 BELL, KAREN 02/07/01 24.76 MW ON AP00164188 004441 BEST BUY CO INC 02/07/01 99.10 ~Sq AP00164189 004833 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 02/07/01 49.89 ~5q OH AP00164190 004699 BOPJ)NER, F~RGIE 02/07/01 60.00 MW AP00164191 001637 BOSLEY, SOLMARI 02/07/01 34.00 MW AP00164192 021821 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASS 02/07/01 425.00 MW ON AP00164193 001223 CALSENSE 02/07/01 381.23 MW OH AP00164194 001638 CARDONA, TOM 02/07/01 40.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/gCE---jOb: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Tlrpe Subs Rel To Note AP00164185 021822 CCPOA 02/07/01 30.00 MW OH AP00164196 006052 CH3~RTER CO~3NICATIONS 02/07/01 41.40 MW OH AP00164197 000488 CHEVRON USA INC 02/07/01 188.64 MW OH AP00164198 001337 CIESLIK, DANIEL 02/07/01 136.00 MW OH CC AP00164199 090336 CLJ~RION HOTEL 02/07/01 188.16 MW OH AP00164200 090336 CLJ~RION HOTEL 02/07/01 470.40 MW OH AP00164201 090336 C~RION HOTEL 02/07/01 376.32 FSq OH AP00164202 090336 CLJ~RION HOTEL 02/07/01 376.32 MW OH AP00164203 004279 CI~RK, DEBORI~H 02/07/01 13.96 MW OH AP00164204 002051 COLTNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 02/07/01 501.35 Ffq OH AP00164205 VOID.CONTIN~/Void - Continued Stub 02/07/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00164206 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 02/07/01 18,409.36 MW OH AP00164207 000284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 02/07/01 2,223.15 MW OH AP00164208 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 02/07/01 138.80 MW OH AP00164209 003698 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 02/07/01 303.65 MW OH AP00164210 001212 DEMARCO JOSEPH J TRUST 02/07/01 800.00 MW OH AR AP00164211 000107 DETCO 02/07/01 63.19 MW OH AP00164212 001551 DFM ASSOCIATES 02/07/01 42.90 MW OH AP00164213 005809 DIETERICH POST COMP~NY 02/07/01 171.52 MW OH AP00164214 005744 DIREC~ 02/07/01 27.99 MW OH AP00164215 041250 DOWNEY GI~ASS CORPORATION 02/07/01 36.00 MW OH AP00164216 003364 EIGHTH AVEN]3E GR/~PHICS 02/07/01 4,829.85 MW OH AP00164217 002422 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 02/07/01 17.95 MW OH AP00164218 003614 ELITE TOWING 02/07/01 232.75 MW OH AP00164219 001627 ENR 02/07/01 148.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL-~loc: FINANCE---job: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG-o- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164220 002349 BSGIL CORPORATION 02/07/01 44,010.76 MW OH AP00164221 004914 EXCLUSIVE BMAGBS 02/07/01 19.35 MW OH AP00164222 002510 FAIRVIEW FORD 02/07/01 24,319.73 MW OH AP00164223 006161 F/~XON CO, THE 02/07/01 476.95 MW OH AP00164224 001294 FIESTA BOOK COMPANY 02/07/01 667.88 MW OH AP00164225 000155 FILARSKy AND WATT 02/07/01 1,955.00 MW OH AP00164226 006556 FINESSE PERSO~FNEL ASSOCIATES 02/07/01 465.90 MW OH AP00164227 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPEIES 02/07/01 2,015.49 MW OH AP00164228 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 02/07/01 166.00 MW OH AP00164229 001684 GENTRY BROS INC 02/07/01 2,601.37 MW OH AP00164230 000139 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 02/07/01 74.67 MW OH AP00164231 001601 GOLDI ICE CRE~M 02/07/01 46.00 MW OH AP00164232 001870 GOMEZ, RICK 02/07/01 10,137.00 MW OH AP00164233 001245 GONSALVES ~ SON, JOE A 02/07/01 4,600.00 MW OH AP00164234 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 02/07/01 805.26 MW OH AP00164235 004486 GUAR/DI/~N 02/07/01 3,285.83 MW OH AP00164236 005699 HAR/~BOS BEVERAGE COMp]~NY 02/07/01 256.80 W~q OH AP00164237 000462 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 02/07/01 494.41 MW OH AP00164238 001636 HERNANDEZ, STEPH3~NIE 02/07/01 34.00 MW OH AP00164239 0001S8 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 02/07/01 670.68 MW OH AP00164240 001608 HOLMES, SBEILA 02/07/01 5.99 MW OH AP00164241 001234 HOSE MAN INC 02/07/01 41.26 MW OH AP00164242 032484 HYATT REGENCy 02/07/01 147.03 MW OH AP00164243 001942 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 02/07/01 229.66 MW OH AP00164244 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 02/07/01 1,095.80 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS {PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --reg: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 22166 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount T~pe Subs Rel To Note AP00164240 001628 I E COP~4LrNICATIONS 02/07/01 75.00 MW OH AP00164246 004694 IIMC 02/07/01 495.00 MW ON AP00164247 001121 IN73EPENDENT ELECTRONICS 02/07/01 146.13 MW OH AP00164248 001218 INTDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 02/07/01 798.75 ~[W ON AP00164249 002315 INLA/{D WNOLESALE NURSERY 02/07/01 281.96 MW ON AP00164250 006496 INNOCORP LTD 02/07/01 85.00 MW OH AP00164251 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 02/07/01 40.25 MW OH AP00164252 001623 ITS SEMINARS 02/07/01 45.00 MW ON AP00164253 000612 JAESCHKE INC, C R 02/07/01 315.21 MW OH AP00164254 003491 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 02/07/01 165.28 MW ON AP00164255 002220 KELLY PAPER COMP/UgY 02/07/01 23.96 MW OH AP00164256 000149 KING, LD 02/07/01 1,110.07 MW ON AP00164257 006193 F~TH BAY 02/07/01 1,712.75 MW OH AP00164258 006516 KRUSE, JOAN A 02/07/01 1,120.00 F~q ON CC AP00164259 005545 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 02/07/01 2,134.75 MW ON AP00164260 000193 IAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 02/07/01 2,850.09 ~q OH AP00164261 005199 LASER LINE 02/07/01 86.15 F~q ON AP00164262 006619 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 02/07/01 172.49 MW OH AP00164263 000849 IAWSON PRODUCTS INC 02/07/01 1,130.08 NM OH AP00164264 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 02/07/01 375.00 MW ON AP00164265 002048 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PLAY 02/07/01 554.00 NW OH AP00164266 001364 LOCAL GOVER/~N'T CO~ISSION 02/07/01 113.99 MW ON AP00164267 005662 LOS ANGELES COCA COIA BTL CO 02/07/01 915.97 ~5q ON AP00164268 003156 LUS LIGETHOUSE INC 02/07/01 745.62 MW ON AP00164269 000549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 02/07/01 90,365.79 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 WED, FEE 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: PINANCE--~job: 22156 #S044 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37~--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164270 000250 MJ~RTINEZ TOWING AND AUTOMOTIV 02/07/01 213.75 F~q OH AP00164271 006579 MARTINEZ, JOELLEN 02/07/01 375.00 MW OH CC AP00164272 005375 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 02/07/01 4,624.00 MW OH AP00164273 001617 MCLS 02/07/01 81.00 NSq OH AP00164274 001203 MERCURY TECHNOLOGY GRP INC 02/07/01 5,750.00 MW OH AP00164275 000602 MEYER, PAT 02/07/01 50,00 ~Sq OH AP00164276 001365 MICKEY, BHENT 02/07/01 880.00 MW OH CC AP00164277 004164 MIDDLESEX OFFICE SUPPLY INC 02/07/01 152.38 MW OH AP00164278 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 02/07/01 29.99 MW OH AP00164279 003860 MOBILE MINI INC 02/07/01 170.94 ME OH AP00164280 001171 MOTOROLA COMMLrNAI~D ELEC INC 02/07/01 2,777.96 ME OH AP00164281 032343 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 02/07/01 25.00 MW OH AP00164282 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 02/07/01 22,542.92 MW OH AP00184283 006687 NATIONS ~ 02/07/01 717.72 ~Bq OH AP00164284 000433 NIXONEGLI EUIPMENT 02/07/01 210.58 MW OH AP00164285 031968 OLMSTE~3, EILEEN 02/07/01 39.00 ~5q OH AP00164286 001635 ORTIZ, ANGIE 02/07/01 1,027.91 MW OH AP00164287 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 02/07/01 13.12 MW OH AP00164288 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~ IRRIGATION 02/07/01 38.12 MW OH AP00164289 006668 PAINTING THE TOWN 02/07/01 7,534.50 MW OH AP00164290 000818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 02/07/01 76.28 MW OH AP00164291 005409 PARTSMASTER INC 02/07/01 37.68 ~ OH AP00164292 000757 PEP BOYS 02/07/01 141.22 ME OH AP00164293 005720 PERVO PAINT CO 02/07/01 322.50 MW OH AP00164294 004267 PETES RO~D SERVICE 02/07/01 712.47 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/gCE---jOb: 22156 #5044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164295 006148 PIRON, SHAUN 02/07/01 204.00 ~q OH CC AP00164296 001626 PLj~NAS, DI~E 02/07/01 25.00 MW OH AP00164297 000255 POFL~ DISTRIBUTING CO 02/07/01 20,029.08 MW OH AP00164298 000693 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC 02/07/01 282.11 MW OH AP00164299 000758 PRAYAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 02/07/01 254.15 MW OH AP00164300 006399 PREMIER PERSONNEL 02/07/01 779.22 MW OH CC AP00164301 004335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SFARING AU 02/07/01 1,020.00 MW OH AP00164302 000251 R ~ R AUTOMOTIVE 02/07/01 694.27 MW OH AP00164303 000345 R D O EQUIPMENT CO POWERPL~ 02/07/01 255.91 MW OH AP00164304 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 02/07/01 32.64 MW OH AP00164305 012052 R/~NCHO CUCAMONGA COMITY FO 02/07/01 6.00 MW OH AP00164306 006329 R/~NCHO TP~SMISSION SERVICE 02/07/01 314.58 MW ON AP00164307 004130 RBM LOCK/~/4D KEY SERVICE 02/07/01 7.36 MW OH AP00164308 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 02/07/01 221.59 MW OH AP00164309 000443 PaI CONSULTING 02/07/01 2,400.00 MW OH AP00164310 001604 RICH, BARBARA 02/07/01 40.00 ~Sq OH AP00164311 005618 RIC~ARDS WATSON/~ND GERSHON 02/07/01 22,663.20 MW OH AP00164312 012008 RITE AID 02/07/01 46.00 ~q OH AP00164313 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 02/07/01 10.91 MW OH AP00164314 003314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 02/07/01 288.41 MW OH AP00164315 000626 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 02/07/01 145.00 MW OH AP00164316 004785 SAFETP3~NS SYSTEMS 02/07/01 580.09 MW OH Ap00164317 011845 SALCEDO CORPORATION 02/07/01 9.00 MW OH Ap00164318 001607 SALDIVAR, PAT 02/07/01 64.00 MW ON Ap00164319 000132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 02/07/01 640.70 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E O I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/qCE---jOb: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164320 001610 SCH/~FFER, JOHN 02/07/01 56.00 NSq OH AP00164321 001629 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 02/07/01 27.00 MW OH AP00164322 011879 SCHLOSSER FORGE COMPANy 02/07/01 508.00 MW OH AP00164323 001622 SCUBA SCHOOLS OF AMERICA 02/07/01 700.00 MW OH AP00164324 001105 SEAL FURNITURE AND SYSTEM INC 02/07/01 5,385.16 MW OH AP00164325 001605 SECURITY SIGNAL SERVICE'S IN 02/07/01 10.59 MW OH AP00164326 000294 SEVERSON PRODUCTS COMPANY 02/07/01 48.60 MW OH AP00164327 001829 S~ARED TECRNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 02/07/01 78.00 MW OH AP00164328 001411 SHAWN CORY 02/07/01 250.00 MW OH AR AP00164329 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 02/07/01 113.04 MW OH AP00164330 006485 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENT 02/07/01 712.35 MW OH AP00164331 001611 SILSBEE, MAGGIE 02/07/01 250.00 MW OH AP00164332 001327 SMART AND FINAL 02/07/01 21.57 MW OH AP00164333 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 02/07/01 1,620.98 MW OH AP00164334 000135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC F 02/07/01 25.00 MW OH AP00164335 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/07/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00164336 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/07/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00164337 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON . 02/07/01 5,416.65 MW OH AP00164338 003058 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 02/07/01 1,408.00 MW OH AP00164339 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 02/07/01 131.00 MW OR AP00164340 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 02/07/01 1,296.87 F~q OH AP00164341 012018 STEER N STEIN OF CUCANONGA 02/07/01 23.00 ~q OH AP00164342 001373 STERLING TRUCK EQUIP~NT 02/07/01 326.72 ~ OH AP00164343 001612 STOCKWELL, SHEILA 02/07/01 80.00 ~ OH AP00164344 001516 STOVER SEED COMP~/~Y 02/07/01 3,151.69 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 22156 ~S044 ..... pro9: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164345 004733 SUNRISE FORD 02/07/01 289.83 MW OH AP00164346 001606 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF L.A. IN 02/07/01 42.00 MW OE AP00164347 005410 T ~aqD D INSTALLATIONS 02/07/01 160.61 MW OH AP00164348 092003 T/~MCO 02/07/01 1,380.00 MW AP00164349 002344 TARGET 02/07/01 147.12 MW OH AP00164350 001151 TECHNIC 02/07/01 245.00 MW OH AP00164351 001615 TELLES, JONI 02/07/01 255.00 MW OH AP00164352 001616 TERLOAN, CRYSTAL 02/07/01 35.00 MW OH AP00164353 003942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 02/07/01 483.00 MW OH AP00164354 006230 TIT~/q INDUSTRIAL FOOTWEAR COR 02/07/01 149.66 MW AP00164355 001919 TOMARK SPORTS INC 02/07/01 185.05 MW OH AP00164356 012737 TR3~N, TERESA 02/07/01 55.00 MW OH AP00164357 001613 TRI-CITY ACOUSTICS INC 02/07/01 21.60 MW OH AP00164358 001614 TRIUMPH SHEET METAL INC 02/07/01 78.73 MW OH AP00164359 003388 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 02/07/01 26,611.00 MW OH AP00164360 092100 U S B/UqK 02/07/01 509,695.41 MW OH AP00164361 001632 U S POSTMASTER 02/07/01 9.00 MW OH AP00164362 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 02/07/01 200.00 MW OH AP00164363 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 02/07/01 406.78 MW OH AP00154364 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 02/07/01 136.62 MW OH AP00164365 003844 UNITED RENTALS 02/07/01 623.73 MW OH AP00164366 000739 US BA/~K 02/07/01 149,220.05 MW OE AP00164367 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 02/07/01 328.50 MW AP00164368 000350 US POSTMASTER 02/07/01 6,500.00 MW OH AP00164369 000350 US POSTMASTER 02/07/01 125.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9 WED, FEB 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCHHR--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164370 003141 VAN TECH 02/07/01 568.62 MW OH AP00164371 000358 VENDU U VENDING 02/07/01 132.15 MW OH AP00164372 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 02/07/01 328.75 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DE AP00164373 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 02/07/01 256.83 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00164374 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 02/07/01 37.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00164375 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/07/01 4,208.22 MW OH AP00164376 012031 VICTORIA/LNIMAL BOSPITAL 02/07/01 194.50 MW OH AP00164377 001618 VONS #75 02/07/01 140.49 MW OH AP00164378 000478 WARREN~/~D CO, CARL 02/07/01 535.02 MW OH AP00164379 001620 WARREN, LARURA C, 02/07/01 9.60 MW OH AP00164380 001621 WATER TECHNOLOGY TRAINING 02/07/01 57.50 MW OH AP00164381 000213 WA/IE 02/07/01 10,831.59 MW OH AP00164382 001619 WHLLS, RICF~AR/D 02/07/01 30.00 MW OH AP00164383 005176 WEST END KIDS CLUB OF THE YMC 02/07/01 2,110.25 MW OH AP00164384 006727 WEST END 02/07/01 169.56 MW OH AP00164385 000399 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DI 02/07/01 14,257.24 MW OH AP00164386 001640 WONG, ROGER 02/07/01 500.00 MW OH AP00164387 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 02/07/01 79.96 MW OH AP00164388 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 02/07/01 4,855.23 MW OH AP00164389 006389 YORBA LINDA, CITY OF 02/07/01 38.33 MW OH AP00164390 001124 YOUNG SALES CO 02/07/01 170.10 MW OH AP00164391 004562 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 02/07/01 712.23 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/07/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page l0 WED, FEE 07, 2001, 5:59 PM --req: KFINCRER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 22156 #S044 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 1133,979.58 Number of Checks Processed: 219 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 1133,979.58 CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/01/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 THU, FEB 01, 2001, 9:22 AM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 20651 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164152 001387 DALY, JASON 02/01/01 100.00 MW IP GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 100.00 Number of Checks Processed: 1 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 100.00 CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, J~/q 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZ/~LE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/~CE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163826 001530 7 ELEVEN 2171 13979 E 02/01/01 46.00 b~q ON AP00163827 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 02/01/01 145.78 MW OH AP00163828 001334 ABLAC 02/01/01 308.99 MW OH AP00163829 000007 ABLETRONICS 02/01/01 52.54 MW OH AP00163830 001531 ADAMS ENT, JOSEPH P 02/01/01 12.60 MW OH AP00163831 001536 ~3DT AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 02/01/01 39.65 MW AP00163832 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 02/01/01 15,767.50 MW OH AP00163833 005509 AIR CON~FROLLED E~IRONME~FTS 02/01/01 4,961.43 MW OH AP00163834 001326 ALH/UgO, STEpPL~NIE 02/01/01 143.50 MW OH AP00163835 001544 ALI, TAHI R 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00163836 001167 ALL CITIES ENTERPRISES 02/01/01 1,800.00 N~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00163837 001537 ALLSIZE 02/01/01 13.39 MW OH AP00163838 001560 ALTAMIRANO, MARTHA 02/01/01 55.00 MW OH AP00163839 001541 AMES, LUCY 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00163840 001554 ANIFLOR, DAVID 02/01/01 85.00 MW OH AP00163841 001565 APODACA, ROSEMARIE 02/01/01 65.00 MW OH AP00163842 005807 ARCHITERPj~ DESIGN GROUP 02/01/01 2,203.74 MW OH AP00163843 001564 ARMBRUSTER, DI~2qE 02/01/01 90.00 MW OH AP00163844 004102 B ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 02/01/01 3,452.41 MW OH AP00163845 006747 B ~UqD R AUTO SERVICE 02/01/01 5,318.94 MW ON AP00163846 001547 B~/~KENBUSH, MARISSA 02/01/01 25.00 NK4 OH AP00163847 032124 BAP~NETT, SUS~ 02/01/01 95.00 MW OH AP00163848 001546 BARTZ, JULIE 02/01/01 50.00 MW OH AP00163849 001538 BAYRICH CONSTRUCTION INC 02/01/01 50.00 MW OH AP00163850 001561 BEDFOPj~, ELLEN 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2 WED, jAN 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN/~NCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CFd~EG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163851 005860 BERGERSON, MARLENE 02/01/01 401.26 MW OR AP00163852 001552 BERRY, DEENA 02/01/01 51.00 MW OH AP00163853 004441 REST BUY CO INC 02/01/01 142.06 MW OH AP00163854 000041 BISHOP COMP/UqY 02/01/01 1,571.40 MW OH AP00163855 001563 BLJ~CK, MARYA 02/01/01 42.00 MW OH AP00163856 001543 BI~CKWELL, HEHRY 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00163857 005757 BRIAR ROSE FLORIST 02/01/01 53.82 MW OH AP00163858 001555 BRINKLEY, N~lqCy 02/01/01 45.00 MW OH AP00163859 001550 BUR/qS, BRENDA 02/01/01 60.00 MW ON AP00163860 002440 BURRUSO, LISA 02/01/01 36.00 MW OH AP00163861 001542 BYUN, JOUNG 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00163862 001553 CAIRES, RICE 02/01/01 120.00 ~ ON AP00163863 000062 CALIFOR/qIA JOURNAL 02/01/01 39.95 MW OH AP00163864 001548 CA/~PBELL, JOSH 02/01/01 25.00 ~Sq ON AP00163865 021709 CAREER CONNECTIONS INC 02/01/01 10.00 AP00163866 090321 CAREER TRACK 02/01/01 149.00 MW OH AP00163867 001540 CASEY, J/~MES 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AP00163868 001539 CATTRAC CONSTRUCTION INC 02/01/01 31.58 NK4 OH AP00163869 001562 CF3~MBERS, DAVE 02/01/01 51.00 MW OH AP00153870 001557 CHAP~U~N, KRISTIN 02/01/01 40.00 MW ON AP00163871 021856 CHEVRON STATIONS 1888 02/01/01 11.27 MW OH AP00163872 000713 CNICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 02/01/01 961.48 MW OH AP00163873 005958 CHIVERS ALFDIO BOOKS 02/01/01 6.50 MW OH AP00163874 001337 CIESLIK, D~NIEL 02/01/01 128.00 MW OH AP00163875 000074 CITY RENTALS 02/01/01 309.50 MW OB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3 WED, J~2g 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE--~job: 20588 #S043 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~nount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163876 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/01/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00163877 000130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 02/01/01 20,645.27 ~Sq OH AP00163878 001328 CONC/~qNON, SHARI 02/01/01 149.50 MW OH AP00163879 001549 COOKE, DARRIN 02/01/01 47.50 ~q OH AP00163880 001545 COOPER, CASSIE 02/01/01 30.00 MW OH AP00163881 006709 COPP CRUSHING, D~N 02/01/01 100.00 ~q ON AP00163882 006711 CORPORS~TE PRIMERS 02/01/01 178.27 MW ON AP00163883 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 02/01/01 343.50 MW OH AP00163884 001592 COX, JULIE 02/01/01 36.00 MW OH AP00163885 005713 CPRS 02/01/01 140.00 ~q OH AP00163886 000085 CUC~j~ONGA CO WATER DIST 02/01/01 6,175.07 MW ON AP00163887 000604 CYEERCOM RESOURCES INC 02/01/01 13,875.00 ~F~ OH AP00163868 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE COMP~2gY 02/01/01 161.26 MW OH AP00163889 041080 DALPAY, REBECCA 02/01/01 71.00 ~Sq OH AP00163890 001574 D~j~, JAYNE 02/01/01 56.00 MW OH AP00163891 001067 DAVID, ROMEO M 02/01/01 2,730.00 MW OH AP00163892 001575 DEFORGE, S~LARI 02/01/01 41.00 ~f~ OH AP00163893 000107 DETCO 02/01/01 11.21 MW OH AP00163894 004544 DICK, ERIC 02/01/01 342.50 MW OH AP00163895 000265 DIMIC SHEET METAL 02/01/01 511.81 ~ OH AP00163896 006515 DJ TEK INC 02/01/01 250.00 ~q OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00163897 004466 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 02/01/01 494.91 NW OH AP00163898 004466 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 02/01/01 458.90 ~q OH AP00163899 004205 DYN~_MIC GRj~PHICS INC 02/01/01 58.95 ~ OH AP00163900 001576 EDDY, TERRI 02/01/01 30.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 WED, J~N 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~_NCE---j ob: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~mount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163901 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GR3~PEICS 02/01/01 579.15 MW OH AP00163902 001577 ELEF~NTE, LINA 02/01/01 47.00 MW AP00163903 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 02/01/01 125.00 MW OH AP00163904 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 02/01/01 475.00 MW OH AP00163905 001578 EV~NS, F~AREN 02/01/01 66.00 MW OH AP00163906 000229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02/01/01 1,330.66 ~5~ OH AP00183907 005917 FASTENAL COMPANY 02/01/01 372.32 ~q OH AP00163908 000123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 02/01/01 183.80 MW OH AP00163909 041111 FESSENDEN, ABBE 02/01/01 32.00 ~q OH AP00163910 006556 FINESSE PERSONIgEL ASSOCIATES 02/01/01 1,067.00 ~F~ OR AP00163911 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 02/01/01 567.51 MW OH AP00163912 004879 FLEET GL~ASS 02/01/01 68.00 ~q OE AP00163913 001579 FLORES, GLENN 02/01/01 28.75 MW AP00163914 001413 FOREM~N ERICA L 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AR AP00163915 001335 FPj~NCHISE TAX BOARD 02/01/01 137.23 MW OH AP00163916 001580 FROST, CINTDy 02/01/01 5.00 ~F~ OH AP00163917 005737 G~E ROOM GALLERY 02/01/01 50.29 ~q OH AP00163918 001581 GARCIA, ROXj~NNE 02/01/01 45.00 ~q OH AP00163919 001582 GILL, GINGER 02/01/01 60.00 MW OR AP00163920 001583 GIVENS, JO~.N 02/01/01 50.00 MW OH AP00163921 006129 GOODWIN, WENDY 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00163922 001584 GORDON, ADELE 02/01/01 37.00 M!~ OH AP00163923 000650 GPj~INGER, WW 02/01/01 2,136.42 ~ OH AP00163924 001585 GRECO, DONIELLA 02/01/01 90.00 MW OH AP00163925 001359 GUSTAFSON, KEITH 02/01/01 216.00 ~F~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 WED, J/Uq 31I 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog! CK200 <l.37>--report id! CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163926 001479 }{AGSTROM, KIMBERLY 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00163927 001480 }{ALL, STA/q 02/01/01 60.00 ~F~ OH AP00163928 001520 }{~CK, JULIE 02/01/01 33.00 MW OH AP00163929 005699 HARAI~BOS BEVERAGE COMP/~NY 02/01/01 643.95 MW OH AP00163930 005909 HASTY AWARDS 02/01/01 169.94 MW OH AP00163931 031755 HAVEN CEIROPRACTIC 02/01/01 234.49 MW OE AP00163932 032715 HEP/q~qDEZ, HECTOR 02/01/01 32.00 MW OH AP00163933 001521 HEPdq;U~TDEZ, VALERIE 02/01/01 34.00 MW OH AP00163934 004845 HILLSIDE COM~/NITY CHURCH 02/01/01 1,000.00 MW OH AP00163935 004928 HOCKEY WEST 02/01/01 1,538.26 MW OH AP00163936 001481 HOFF, JACQUELINE 02/01/01 55.00 MW OE AP00163937 006587 HOLMES /UqD NARVER INC 02/01/01 58,621.46 MW OH AP00163938 004852 HOPKINS, LORI 02/01/01 500.00 MW OH CC AP00163939 001482 HOUSING ACTION RESOURCES TRUS 02/01/01 40.00 MW OE AP00163940 001483 HOLPTAPPELS, MICHELE 02/01/01 45.00 MW OE AP00163941 000161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 02/01/01 200.93 MW OE AP00163942 004254 IBM CORPORATION 02/01/01 10,318.62 MW OH AP00163943 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 02/01/01 52.58 MW OH AP00163944 000122 INL~lgD VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 02/01/01 3,439.58 MW OH AP00163945 001484 JAIN MD, DAKSHAA 02/01/01 30.00 MW OH AP00163946 001485 JARA, APav~gDO 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00163947 001486 JENSEN FAMILY TRUST 02/01/01 18.74 MW OH AP00163948 001487 JITNEY CO 02/01/01 1,000.00 MW OH AP00163949 000179 FJ~ISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLJUg 02/01/01 38,868.91 MW OH AP00163950 001488 KARRAA, YOI~A 02/01/01 52.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS {PROD) 01/31/01 C N E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, JAN 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL jL--loc: FINANCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163951 001489 KELLEHER, DEBBY 02/01/01 125.00 MW OH AP00163952 001490 KEMP, MYRNA 02/01/01 50.00 MW OH AP00163953 001491 KEYS, CARI 02/01/01 35.00 MW OH AP00163954 003102 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 02/01/01 23.00 MW AP00163955 001493 KRIZM~/q, ERIN 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00163956 000297 L A SIGNAL INC 02/01/01 14,563.28 MW OH AP00163957 006410 LA FLEET MONITORING 02/01/01 450.12 MW ON AP00163958 001463 LA ROCA, IGLESIA 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AR AP00163959 000195 LjUgCE SOLL A/qD LLrNGH~RD 02/01/01 641.00 MW OH AP00163960 001494 L/~NDMARK BUILDING PRODUCTS, I 02/01/01 23.00 MW AP00163961 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 02/01/01 375.00 MW ON AP00163962 000857 LEARNING WONDERS 02/01/01 201.15 ~FW OH AP00163963 001495 LIL JO'S FINE ART 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00163964 001462 LIMON, D/~NNY 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AR AP00163965 001496 LITTLE AMERICA 02/01/01 462.66 MW OH AP00163966 002048 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PLAY 02/01/01 1,750.94 MW ON AP00163967 001523 LIZARRAGA, DENISE 02/01/01 60.00 MW AP00163968 001497 LLOYD, VIRGINA 02/01/01 60.00 MW AP00163969 001455 LONGS DRUGS 02/01/01 60.58 MW OH AP00163970 001499 LORD CONSTRUCTION 02/01/01 92.00 MW AP00163971 005662 LOS ~qGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 02/01/01 325.93 MW OH AP00163972 001008 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 02/01/01 379.27 MW OH AP00163973 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 02/01/01 251.00 MW OH AP00163974 004000 M S A 02/01/01 70.00 MW OH AP00163975 001500 MACEAN, CHERYL 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, JAN 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL jL--loc: FINANCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00163976 000549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 02/01/01 12,335.55 MW OH AP00163977 001293 MASUNE 02/01/01 368.75 MW OH AP00163978 002555 MCALLISTER DESIGN 02/01/01 800.00 MW OH CC AP00163979 001524 MCNERNEY, KEN 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00163980 002198 MICRAELS STORES INC 3019 02/01/01 93.45 MW OH AP00163981 001365 MICKEY, BRENT 02/01/01 880.00 MW OH CC AP00163982 001474 MILLER, MICH3UEL 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AP00163983 001501 MORG~2J, N~U{A 02/01/01 33.00 MW OH AP00163984 001502 MORRISON, BRYAN 02/01/01 56.00 MW OH AP00153985 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 02/01/01 13.85 MW OH AP00163986 001525 N/~NFITO, BETH 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00163987 001331 NELSON, SUSAN 02/01/01 473.00 MW OH AP00163988 001503 NEWKY, CATHY 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00163989 032184 NG/tN]{A, NGUYEN 02/01/01 40.25 MW OH AP00163990 005428 NOLO PP~ESS 02/01/01 209.48 MW OH AP00163991 005314 NRPA 02/01/01 450.00 MW OH AP00163992 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 02/01/01 2,981.59 MW OH AP00163993 001504 OLD WORLD IMPORTS 02/01/01 7.36 N[~ OH AP00163994 001505 OLIVEIRA POOL PLj~STERING 02/01/01 14.40 MW OH AP00163995 001948 ORi~CLE CORP 02/01/01 23,705.60 MW OH AP00163996 001330 ORANGE, COUNTY OF 02/01/01 346.67 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00183997 004904 OTT, I~AURA 02/01/01 388.50 MW OH CC AP00163998 001441 PACIFIC BELL 02/01/01 1,461.37 MW OH AP00163999 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~2qD IRRIGATION 02/01/01 129.88 MW OH AP00164000 001823 PAGENET 02/01/01 1,678.65 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, J~hN 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--lOC: FIN~UgCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164001 001823 PAGENET 02/01/01 1,524.66 MW OH AP00164002 001506 PARK WEST GROUP 02/01/01 10.52 MW OH AP00164003 001507 PASCUAL MD, FILOMEN3~ 02/01/01 30.00 MW AP00164004 001508 PEREZ, IDALIA 02/01/01 60.75 MW OH AP00164005 001325 PETERNL~N, CHERYL 02/01/01 445.50 N~q OH AP00164006 001509 PETRO BUILDERS INC 02/01/01 29.00 MW OH AP00164007 001511 PINOLE VALLEY TRUCKING INC 02/01/01 522.00 ~[~ OH AP00164008 006148 PIRON, SPLALrN 02/01/01 204.00 MW OH CC AP00164009 001513 pITNU{N, DARLENE 02/01/01 45.00 MW OH AP00164010 000791 PMIDELTA CARE 02/01/01 1,005.56 MW OH AP00164011 000255 POMA DISTRIBL~fING CO 02/01/01 1,226.61 MW OH AP00164012 000758 PR3~XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 02/01/01 1.00 MW AP00164013 001514 PREFERRED MEDICAL SERVICES 02/01/01 16.65 MW OH AP00164014 003286 PRINCIPAL LIFE 02/01/01 82,242.47 ~ OH AP00164015 000295 PRYOR RESOURCES INC 02/01/01 59.00 MW OH AP00164016 001515 PURCELL, DENISE 02/01/01 36.00 MW AP00164017 001517 PURDY, SHEILI~ 02/01/01 116.00 MW OH AP00164018 001526 PURTLE, KAREN 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH AP00164019 001518 QUAKES COMFKEgITY FOUNDATION 02/01/01 150.00 MW OH AP00164020 001519 QUALITY IMPORTS 02/01/01 15.00 ~ OH AP00164021 001323 QUIbTT~lqA, ZITA 02/01/01 193.00 AP00164022 004025 R J SUPPLY CO 02/01/01 174.72 MW OH AP00164023 000418 R M A GROUP 02/01/01 232.00 MW OH AP00164024 001528 P~AFCO PRODUCTS 02/01/01 1,350.25 MW OH AP00164025 001205 Pj%INBOW BOOK COMP~lqY 02/01/01 1,046.58 MW CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9 WED, J~/q 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/gCE---jOb: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164026 001529 P~A_NCHO CALIFORNIA PU~NAGEMEbFT 02/01/01 27.00 MW OR AP00164027 011868 RECOVERY SERVICE ALLrMNI 02/01/01 200.00 MW OH AR AP00164028 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 02/01/01 1,093.69 ~ OH AP00164029 001324 REIN}L~RDTSEN, DEBRA 02/01/01 282.50 MW OH AP00164030 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 02/01/01 2,762.16 MW ON AP00164031 000443 R/{I CONSULTING 02/01/01 1,920,00 MW OH AP00164032 000528 RIDGELINE ROOFING 02/01/01 300.00 MW OH AP00164033 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 02/01/01 513.83 MW OH AP00164034 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 02/01/01 226.00 MW OH AP00164035 001532 ROBERTS, CATHY 02/01/01 30.00 bfW OH AP00164036 000626 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 02/01/01 185.00 MW OH AP00164037 001533 ROGERS, Ma~RCIA 02/01/01 35.00 MW OH AP00164038 012640 RUBENSTEIN, BELINDA 02/01/01 70.00 MW OH AP00164039 001534 RUDY, KIMBERLY 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00164040 000983 RUSSELL, ADRIE~TNE 02/01/01 250.00 MW OH AP00164041 001004 S ~ S WORLDWIDE 02/01/01 439.87 MW OR AP00164042 001566 SALAZAR, GINA DURAN 02/01/01 48.00 MW OH AP00164043 001590 SAN BERN COLrNTy CHILD SUPPORT 02/01/01 231.00 MW OH AP00164044 000301 S~N BER/g COLr~FfY SHERIFFS 02/01/01 5,634.53 ~ OH AP00164045 011756 SCHMIDT, PAUL 02/01/01 41.50 MW OH AP00164046 001105 SEAL FURNITURE ~2qD SYSTEM INC 02/01/01 525.60 MW OH AP00164047 001567 SELECT COPY SYSTEMS 02/01/01 15.00 MW OH AP00164048 003896 SENEC~LAL, CAL 02/01/01 192.50 MW OH Ap00164049 001829 SHARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 02/01/01 3,513.18 ~F~ OH AP00164050 001570 SHINE, DERRA 02/01/01 60.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10 WED, JAN 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINA_NCE---j ob: 20588 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164051 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 02/01/01 851.23 MW OH AP00164052 001568 SILVER NAIL 02/01/01 22.15 MW OH AP00164053 001327 SMART A/qD FINAL 02/01/01 249.92 MW OH AP00164054 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 02/01/01 95,432.45 MW OH AP00164055 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 02/01/01 10,548.86 MW OH AP00164056 011861 SOROKOWSKI, JON 02/01/01 500.00 MW OH AP00164057 VOID.CONTINU Void ~ Continued Stub 02/01/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00164058 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/01/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00184059 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/01/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00164060 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 02/01/01 7,909.58 MW OH AP00164061 005722 SPECTRA COMP/~NY 02/01/01 4,947.00 MW OH AP00164062 001535 SPRIIqT 02/01/01 1.18 MW OH AP00164063 001571 STEELSCAPE INC 02/01/01 380.59 MW OH AP00164064 005281 STERICYCLE INC 02/01/01 4,195.23 MW OH AP00164065 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00164066 012400 STRI~N/U{AE, WALLI JEA/q 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00164067 004733 SUNRISE FORD 02/01/01 42.18 MW OH AP00164068 001569 SYITEC GROUP 02/01/01 23.13 MW OH AP00164069 002344 TARGET 02/01/01 370.89 MW OH AP00164070 012535 TAYLOR, MONDI 02/01/01 4S.00 MW OH AP00164071 006159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTIN 02/01/01 1,072.50 MW OH AP00164072 001572 TECHTRANS INT'L INC 02/01/01 25.20 MW OH AP00164073 003942 TERMINIX INTEPa4ATIONAL 02/01/01 514.00 MW OH AP00164074 001573 TPL~MS, BECKY 02/01/01 125.00 MW OH AP00164075 004351 TOBIN, RENEE 02/01/01 9.93 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11 WED, J~/q 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164076 003388 TRUGREEN LAiqDCARE REGIONAL 02/01/01 10,846.00 MW OH AP00164077 001060 TRUSCO MANUFACTURING CO 02/01/01 577.00 MW OH AP00164078 012070 UM/~NSKY, LAUREN 02/01/01 40.00 MW OH AP00164079 004788 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO C 02/01/01 235.75 MW OH AP00164080 003437 LrNIFIRST LTNIFORM SERVICE 02/01/01 1,128.46 MW OH AP00164081 004206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 02/01/01 42.24 MW OH AP00164082 005520 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS OF CA 02/01/01 648.44 MW OH AP00164083 006707 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 02/01/01 1,288.86 MW OH AP00164084 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 02/01/01 88.71 MW OH AP00164085 003844 UNITED RENTALS 02/01/01 359.23 MW OH AP00164086 000919 UNITED WAY 02/01/01 612.57 MW OH AP00164087 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 02/01/01 328.50 MW OH AP00164088 012198 VALLE, CAROLYN 02/01/01 185.00 MW OH AP00164089 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 02/01/01 3,567.89 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00164090 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/01/01 2,471.17 MW OH AP00164091 006532 VERIZON 02/01/01 14,449.53 MW OH AP00164092 001099 VETER/LN REAL ESTATE 02/01/01 115.72 MW OH AP00164093 001329 VOLM, LISA 02/01/01 112.50 MW OH AP00164094 000213 WAXIE 02/01/01 1,298.61 MW OH AP00164095 001522 WE TIP 02/01/01 225.00 MW OH AP00164096 011931 WEIGHT WATCHERS OF S~2q DIEGO 02/01/01 58.00 MW OH AP00164097 004331 WEST END yWCA 02/01/01 969.00 MW OH AP00164098 001586 WHITTINGTON, DU~NE 02/01/01 78.00 MW OH AP00164099 000212 WILLD~/q ASSOCIATES 02/01/01 43,712.16 MW OH AP00164100 011713 WILLIAMS, GINA 02/01/01 34.50 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/31/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 12 WED, J/Uq 31, 2001, 5:39 PM --req: CGONZALE--teg: GL JL--loc: FIN/tNCE~o-jOb: 20588 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00164101 001587 WILSON, SHERRY 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00164102 011836 WOODSIDE HOMES/WOODSIDE BELMO 02/01/01 9,738.77 MW OH AP00164103 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 02/01/01 180.51 MW OH AP00164104 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 02/01/01 13,800.95 MW OH AP00164105 006265 XPRESS PRESS 02/01/01 77.15 MW OH AP00164106 001588 YOO, HEE SUK 02/01/01 25.00 MW OH AP00184107 001591 ZAPATA, FRANCES 02/01/01 50.00 MW OH AP00164108 000348 ZEP M3U~jFACTURING COMP/~NY 02/01/01 1,003.17 MW OH AP00164109 011821 ZIFNIGA, VALERIE 02/01/01 267.11 MW OH GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 4 Total void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 624,267.94 Number of Checks Processed: 280 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 624,267.94 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2001 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Matudty 360 Equlv. 365 Equlv. Local Agency Investment Funds 25,975,210.10 25,975,210.10 25,975,210.10 21.43 1 1 6,285 6.372 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. * Bank 5,325,532.00 5,339,492.94 5,325,532.00 4.39 365 113 6,923 7,019 Cemmerdal Paper - Discount 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,951,834.72 3.26 68 32 4.821 4.887 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 80,000,000.00 80,508,198.25 79,959,843.75 65.96 1,657 968 6,094 6.178 Treasury Securities - Coupon 6,000,000.00 6,033,750.00 5,973,437.50 4,93 725 201 5.785 5.865 Mortgage Backed Securities 34,417.07 35,920.95 32,017.10 0.03 8.083 3.169 9.846 9,982 Investments 121,335,159.17 121,892,572.24 121,217,875.t7 100.00% 1,t49 655 6.115 6.200 Cash Passbook/Checking 789,250,83 789,250.83 789,250.83 1 1 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield Calculations) Total Cash and Investments 122,t24,4t0.00 122,681,823.07 122,007,126.00 1,t49 655 6.115 6.200 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 627,177.80 4,176.257.46 Average Daily Balance 119,084,434.01 113,994,263.91 Effective Rate of Return 6.20% 6.22% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in cemformity with the investment policy adopted Octsber 4, 2000. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The monthEnd market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interaclive Data Corporation pddng service. The attached Summary of Ca d Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the pdor month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the manage of nds. Ja . ~ Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/13/2001 - 1027 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5,01f City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2001 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment 9 Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity n=fA Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 25,975,210.10 25.975,210.10 25,975,210.10 6.372 6.285 1 Subtoll and Average 25,694,876.22 25,975,2t0.10 25,975,2t0.10 25,975,210.10 6285 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050EJG1 1061 BANK OF AMERICA 03/15/2000 1,810,53200 1.812,275.36 1.810,532.00 6.560 6,560 42 05/15/2001 06050EMS1 1064 BANK OF AMERICA 06/05/2000 2,000,000.00 2,012,659.20 2,000,000.00 7.330 7.330 124 06/06/2001 06050ERH0 1070 NATIONSBANK NA 08/02/2000 1,515,000.00 1,514.558.38 1,515.000.00 6.820 6.820 182 06/02/2001 Subtoll and Average 5,325,532.00 5~325,532.00 5,339~92.94 5,325,532.00 6.923 113 Commercial Paper - Discount 35075RQN9 1074 FOUNTAIN SQUARE 12/27/2000 1,000,000,00 1 ,GO0,000,00 985,172.22 6.280 0.000 49 03/22/200t 8935(}APU4 t073 TRANSAMERICACORP 12/27/2000 3,000,000,00 3.000,000.00 2,966,662,50 6.350 6.421 27 02/28/2001 Subtotal and Average 3,951,834.72 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,951,834.72 4,821 32 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/27/1997 2,000,000.00 2.034,525.76 2,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 419 03/27/2002 31331RDX0 00996 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2,031,867.98 1,999,375.00 6.240 6.162 531 07/17/2002 31331RMS1 01002 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/07/1998 1,000,000.00 t,005,191.96 1,000,000.00 6,330 6.243 705 01/07/2003 3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,040,769.96 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 704 01/0612003 31331RUG8 01022 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/27/1998 2,000,000.00 2,007,031.86 1,999,375.00 6.290 6.211 845 05/27/2003 31331RQ65 01036 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/15/1998 2,000,000.00 1,995,053.71 2,000,000.00 5.660 5.582 1,047 12/15/2003 31331R2Y0 01042 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/16/1999 3,000,000.00 3.C00,014,65 3,000,000,00 5.930 5.849 1,139 03/16/2004 31331R306 01045 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/07/1999 2,000,000.00 2,002,20t.84 1,997.500.00 5.850 5.805 795 04/07/2003 31331R4R3 01046 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/26/1999 4,0~0,000.00 3,992,827.76 3,997,500.00 5.850 5.784 1,181 04/27/2004 31331RTE9 01052 FEDERALFARMCREDITBANK 06/21/1999 2,000,000.00 2,009,385.99 2,000,000.00 6.375 6,288 505 06/21/2002 31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2601 2,000,000.00 2,003,750,00 2,000,000.00 5.730 5.652 1,453 01/24/2005 3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01~6/1998 1,000,000,00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 704 01/96/2003 3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,995,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.530 5.454 1,040 12/06/2003 3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1999 1,000,000.00 996,875.00 1.000,000.00 5.510 5.435 1,084 01/21/2004 3133M86L3 01043 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/23/1999 3.000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000,00 5.755 5,676 599 09/25/2002 3133M8878 01044 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/06/1999 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 5.700 5,622 1,160 04/06/2004 3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,085,312.50 2,984,531.25 6,230 6.265 1,232 06/17/2004 3133M9501 01051 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/21/1999 2,000,000.00 2,066,875.00 1,999,375.00 6.150 6.077 505 06/21/2002 3133M96K3 01053 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/1999 2,000,000,00 2,033,125.00 1,996,875.00 6.480 6.428 1.243 05/26/2004 3133M9CG5 01054 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/13/1999 1,000.000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 6,040 5.957 162 07/13/2001 3133MARK7 t059 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/25/2000 2,000,000.00 2,040,000.00 1,999,687.50 7.000 6.910 754 02/26/2003 3133MBHV2 1062 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/25/2000 2,000,000.00 2,068,750.00 1,994,375.00 7.890 7.850 1,565 05/16/2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2001 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Mad~et Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3133MBM46 1067 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/13/2000 1,000,000.00 1,008,437.50 1,000,000.00 7.550 7,447 680 12/13/2002 3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,008,437,50 2,997,157.50 5.760 5.707 1,453 01/24/2005 3134A1~45 01000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/22/1~97 2,0G0,000.00 2,000,000,00 2,000,000.00 6.320 6.233 628 15/22/2002 3134A2PN2 01030 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 08/20/lS98 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.050 5.967 930 08/20/2003 3134A2XJ2 01033 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG, CORP. 11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 1,9~9,375.00 2,000,000,00 5.790 5.711 1,026 11/24/2003 3134A2N20 01037 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 01/1411999 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5,600 5.523 712 01/14/2003 3134A3NS1 01047 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/04/1999 5.000,000.00 4,~98,437.50 5,000,000.00 5.900 5.819 1,188 05/04/2004 312~02E96 1072 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 08/07/2000 2,000,000.00 2,017,761.84 1 ,~97,812.50 7.050 7,012 552 03/07/2002 31364FC33 01016 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/04/1998 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 6.280 6.194 823 03/05/2003 31364FG96 01015 FEDERALNATLMTGASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000,00 2,038,203,74 2,000,000,00 6,125 6,041 837 05/19/2003 31364GBE8 01032 FEDERALNATLMTGASSN 10/05/1~98 2,000,000.00 1,996,915.89 2,000,000.00 5.670 5.592 977 10/06/2003 31364GJM2 01034 FEDERALNATLMTGASSN 12/01/1998 2,000,000.00 1,991,237.79 2,000,000,00 5.520 5.444 1,033 12/01/2003 31364GTJ8 01039 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/11/1999 4,000,000.00 3,997,707.52 3,996,250.00 5.860 5.801 1,105 02/11/2004 313~4KPT1 1065 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/06/2000 3.000,000.00 3,106,875.00 3,000,000.00 7.875 7.767 1,586 06/05/2005 Subtotal and Average 78,478,059.48 80,000,000.00 80,508,198.25 79,959,843.75 6.094 968 Treasury Securities - Coupon 9128275H1 01049 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/1999 4,000,060.00 4,002,500.00 3,977,500.00 5.250 5.478 119 05/31/2001 9128275X6 1058 TRF_ASURYNOTE 01/31/2000 2.000,000,00 2.031.250,00 1,995,937.50 6.375 6.396 364 01/31/2002 Subtotal and Average 5,973~37.50 6,000,000.00 6,033,750.00 5,973,437.50 5.785 201 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401w'.q7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/25/1987 2,608.05 2,648.15 2,589.29 8.000 8.219 334 01/01/2002 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERALNATLMTGASSN 09/15/1987 31.101.43 32,562.89 28,729.95 8.500 10.018 3,499 09/01/2010 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENTNATIONALMORTGASSN 06/23/1986 707.59 711.91 697.86 8.500 8.778 103 05/15/2001 36215XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 05/23/1986 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00~ 8.547 0 03/15/2001 Subtotal and Average 32,682.13 34,417.07 35,g20.95 32,0t7.t0 9.846 3,169 Total lnvestments and Average 118,856~122.04 t2t,335,159.17 121,892,57224 121~17~75. t7 6.1t5 655 ~ Poilfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/13r2001 - 1027 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01f City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash January 31, 2001 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Maffint Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Cash Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 789,250.83 789,250.83 2.000 1.973 1 Cash Subtotal and Average Balance 228,011.96 Cash Account Total 789~50.83 Total Cash and Investments 1t9,084,434.01 122,124,410.00 122,68t,823,07 122,007,126.00 6.115 655 CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 5 Investment Activity By Type January 1,2001 through January 31, 2001 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Sales/Maturities Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Witl'ddrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly SummaW) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 6.372 3,344,577.30 2,500,000.00 Subtotal 25,130,632.80 3,344,577.30 2,500,000.00 25,9752t0.t0 SavingslMiscellaneousAccounts (MonthlySummary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2.~00 579,946.83 0.00 Subtotal 209,304.00 579,946.83 0.00 789250.83 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Subtotal 5,325,532.00 5,325,532.00 Commercial Paper - Discount Subtotal 3,951,834.72 3,951,834.72 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.730 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.760 01/24/2001 2,997,187.50 0.CO 3134AILB4 00994 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 6.630 01/24/2001 0.00 3,000,000.00 Subtotal 77,962,656.25 4,997,187.50 3,000,000.00 79,959,843.75 TreasuP/Securities - Coupon Subtotal 5,973,437.50 5,973,437.50 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401VVW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 01116/2001 0.00 407.70 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERALNATLMTGASSN 8+500 01/26/2001 0.00 313.19 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENTNATIONALMORTGASSN 8+500 01/17/2(X:ll 0.00 296.34 36215XZS4 06069 GOVERNMENTNATIONALMORTGASSN 9.000 01/17/2001 0.00 140.15 Subtotal 33,t74.48 0.00 1,157.38 32,017.10 TOtal 1t8,586,571.75 8,921,711.63 5,501,157.38 122,007,t26.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended December 3'1, 2000 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Payinf:l A.qent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A* 5.50% $ 257,311.00 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.78 Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A* 5.50% 248,701.00 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.59 Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A 5.50% 5,337.00 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.56 $ 511,350.93 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 5,50% $ 26,986.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 5,50% 595,297.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv, Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 5.50% 1,118,337.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.13 Redemption Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 5.50% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 3/2/00 N/A* 5.50% 194,875.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.37 $ 1,935,495.50 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,446,846.43 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated matudty date as they may be liquidated upon den~nd. i:VinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 2/12/01 5:18 PM RANC HO CUCA MON GA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRepo DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE ARROW ROUTE CROSS-GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9th STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11763035650/1221-176 AND 11763035650/1264-176 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Arrow Route Cross-gutter Removal and the Hellman Avenue Drainage Improvements, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Arrow Route Project will remove the existing slotted cross-gutter across Arrow Route west of Hellman Avenue and replace it with an underground storm drain system. Drainage will no longer cross the street on the surface, which has caused substantial pavement deterioration over the years, as well as being a general nuisance to the traveling public. Also, the bump caused by the cross-gutter will be eliminated. The Hellman Project will construct a catch basin on the east side of Hellman Avenue north of 9th Street to pick up nuisance water, and convey it underground to the existing underground system on the west side of the street. Nuisance water will no longer cross 9th Street, which, like Arrow Route, has caused substantial pavement deterioration over the years. The projects will be funded from Measure I funds (Account Nos. 11763035650/1221-176 (Arrow) and 11763035650/1264-176 (Hellman)). Staff has determined that the projects are Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ARROW ROUTE/HELLMAN AVENUE PROJECT February 21, 2001 Page 2 The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $137,000 including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $4,000 estimated for construction survey, and $1,500 estimated for soils and material testing. Legal advertising is scheduled for February 27, 2001 and March 6, 2001, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 20, 2001. Re ctfully submitted ~a~mj.O,Neil~'~~ City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution EXHIBIT "A" Foofl~ill Boul~ ~ Arrow Route Cross-Gutter Arrow Route~ Helhnan Avenue Drainage 9th Street ~ ARROW ROUTE CROSS.GUTTER AND HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPRQVEMEIITS VICINITY MAP / RESOX UTIONNO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE CROSS-GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9th STREET "IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consUuct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "ARROW ROUTE CROSS-GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9th STREET ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 20, 2001, sealed bids or proposals for the "ARROW ROUTE CROSS-GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9th STREET" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of ARROW ROUTE CROSS- GUTTER REMOVAL WEST OF HELLMAN AND THE HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF 9th STREET ". RESOLUTION NO. February 21, 2001 Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor trader him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship comnaittee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of olle to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. RESOLUTION NO. February 21, 2001 Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of Califomia having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failare to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an RESOLUTION NO. February 21, 2001 Page 4 amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). RESOLUTION NO. February 21,2001 Page 5 The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21 st day of February, 2001 Publish Dates: February 27 and March 6, 2001 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 21 st day of February, 2001. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21 st day of February, 2001. Executed this 21 st day of February, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: February 27 and March 6, 2001 RANCH 0 C UCA MONGA ]~NG|NI~I:I~ING DIVIc~ION Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Solid Waste/Recycling Subcommittee SUBJECT: AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the agreement and exclusive permit for solid waste collection within residential service areas in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, thereby directing Burrtec Disposal Industries and USA/VVaste Management to implement automated refuse, recycling, and green waste programs. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to make any necessary changes consistent with the amendment and take all actions necessary to implement this approval. BACKGROUND The City's franchised waste haulers, Burrtec Disposal Industries and USA/VVaste Management, are requesting the city's permission to initiate an automated waste- hauling program in Rancho Cucamonga for residential waste and recycling, Staff has evaluated USANVaste Management's proposal to fully automate their service area and Burrtec Disposal Industries' proposal to automate only trash and recyclables in their service area. Staff's evaluation indicates that the proposed programs would be beneficial to the city and should result in a further reduction of our waste stream as mandated by AB 939. The City's existing residential trash collection is done manually. Residents are offered recycling bins for voluntary recycling and a green waste program in which residents use their own refuse containers for green waste. AB 939 mandates that California cities and counties reduce their waste streams by 50%, using 1990 totals as a baseline, by the year 2000. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's 1999 Diversion Report calculated a diversion rate of 45% of the 1990 base year. Automated CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN February 21, 2001 Page 2 collection programs are identified in the AB 939 Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SREE) as an effective means of reducing waste streams and, according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports, automated refuse collection programs in California are averaging a 15% increase in overall waste stream diversion over manual programs. Additionally, citizens seem to take advantage of the bigger containers for recyclable materials and take more time to recycle. Therefore, the Subcommittee views this program as a significant opportunity for additional diversion for the City. The following is a basic overview of the proposed automated collection program: Collection: Refuse trucks are equipped with a mechanical arm that lifts and empties a specially designed refuse container that has wheels and attached lids. The waste hauler provides these automated containers. Containers: The standard sizes are a 96-gallon container for regular waste, a 96-gallon container for green waste, and a 60-gallon container for recyclables (plastic, glass, aluminum, etc.) Each container is color coded to specify which waste material should be placed inside. All of these new containers are on wheels, making them easier to use and move around than even a typical 30-gallon trash container. The automation program proposals differ among the two franchise haulers in the following ways: Burrtec: Will provide containers for both regular waste and recyclables, but will continue with current manual pickup of green waste using the customers' own containers/bags. The concern about contamination and the large amount of green waste in their franchise area were factors in Burrtec's decision to limit the automated program in their service area to regular waste and recyclables. USAA/Vaste Manaqement: Will provide 3 containers for residents in their franchise area of Terra Vista: 1) regular waste, 2) recyclables and 3) green waste. A majority of this franchise hauler's customers have smaller lots and create very little green waste in comparison to the rest of the City. Once given direction to proceed, the franchise haulers indicate that they can begin implementation within 90 days, including 30 days for public education and 60 days for conversion to the automated program. Burrtec, with a larger service area, will convert one route at a time and USA/Waste Management will convert their smaller area all at the same time. Changes in residential routes and pickup days will accompany the conversion process and all such changes will be clearly documented and publicized as part of the education program. Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste/NPDES Coordinator, will work closely with the haulers and oversee the conversion processes to ensure the least amount of service interruptions and inconvenience to our residents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN February 21, 2001 Page 3 The Subcommittee recommends that the costs related to the program implementation, including the purchase of the containers, purchase or modification of the vehicles and equipment, and the costs associated with the education campaign, be absorbed by the franchised haulers. The proposed amended agreement prohibits any rate increases during the first two years of the automated program. The following information outlines the activities performed to date by city staff in the development of an automated trash program in Rancho Cucamonga. Also included is a timeline for implementation of the proposed programs: September 2000 City staff met with each of the franchised haulers to set goals and objectives for the automation program and conversion process. October 2000 Staff briefed the City Manager regarding program development and met with the haulers to outline the design of informational brochures for the public education campaign, December 2000 Staff met with the Solid Waste/Recycling Subcommittee to present an update about automation activities and the proposed program. The Subcommittee approved the concept of the proposed program. March 2001 Informational brochures will be mailed out to all residential customers. Inserts in the trash bill will also be sent out to inform and educate the community about automation. Cable and radio ads promoting automation and informing citizens of upcoming public meetings will also begin this month. Other forms of communication to be utilized will include newspaper ads, the Grapevine, and RCTV Channel 3. Public meetings to answer the questions and concerns of the community will be held. An 800 number will be established by the haulers to answer any questions during the implementation phase. This number will be used as long as deemed necessary to answer resident questions and concerns. Prior to implementation, City Hall staff will also be trained on the program and how it is to work. April 2001 Begin a phased, by route, delivery of bins to the community. A public relations event will be planned to kick off the delivery of the bins with City Council Members present. May 2001 In May, staff will review the program to date and make any necessary adjustments or modifications. Staff will keep the City Council updated on the progress of the automation program throughout the year, including information related to waste stream diversion and recycling reports. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN February 21, 2001 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the agreement and exclusive permit for solid waste collection within residential service areas in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, thereby directing Burrtec Disposal Industries and USA/Waste Management to implement automated refuse, recycling, and green waste programs. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to make any necessary changes consistent with the amendment and take all actions necessary to implement this approval. Respectfully Submitted, ~am j. O'Neil City Engineer ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste/NPDES Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the resolution to seek these funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 14581 (a)(4)(A) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling (Division) is required to distribute a total of $10.500,000 to eligible cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities. Each city may receive a minimum of $5,000 or an amount calculated by the Division, per capita based, whichever is greater. The per capita amount calculated by the Division, is based upon the population of the incorporated areas of the city, as stated in the Annual Demographic Report submitted to the Governor by the Department of Finance. The eligible participant must provide a description of an activity(ies) that meet one or more of the following criteria do: · The activity has a primary emphasis on collection and recycling of beverage containers at large venues. public areas, residential communities or schools; CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RECYCLING AND/OR LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL GRANT February 21,2001 Page 2 · The activity has a primary emphasis on public education promoting beverage container recycling and/or litter prevention; or · The Activity has a primary emphasis on beverage container litter prevention and/or abatement in public places including community clean-up projects or related activities involving the recycling of beverage containers. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been allocated $36,120.00 to do programs related to "Recycling and/or Litter Reduction Activities". We are proposing the following for these funds: · Purchase recycling bins for parks and facilities that have vending machines and/or snack bars that sell beverage containers · We will work with non-profit or sports groups to maintain the recycle containers. The incentive being they can keep the proceeds for the recycling of the beverage containers. This is being done by a couple of cities with good results. · We will use some of the funds to do public education on cable and in the newspaper with emphasis on recycling beverage containers in the recycle bin(s) at the curb or at city parks and facilities. · Work on a school program to get recycling in as many schools as we can. We already have a number of schools on service, but this would help to expand the recycling efforts. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw RESO ,t TION NO. 0/" c9 Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Conta. iner Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage contmner recycling and litter cleanup activities; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the program; and WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a) (4)(E) of the California Beverage Container and Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the due date and time in order to request funds from the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request Form to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The City Engineer, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City ofRancho Cucamonga all necessary forms hereto for the purposes of securing payments and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the Section 14581 (a) (4) (A) of the California Beverage Container and Litter Reduction Act and provide information regarding this program to the Division upon request. RA C H O C UCA MO N GA PUBLIC LIBRARY SmffRel rt DKHE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Gucamonga City Council Jack Lam, AIGP, City ManaOer FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Libm~ Dimdot 8U~E~: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIAT~ CALIFORNIA 8TAT~ LIBRARY INTO ~IBRARY EXP~DITUR~ ~COMMENDATION Appropriate $13,000 received from the State into expenditure account 12986015010 in the following roger: 5010 P~ time Salaries $ 13,000 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS For 2000/2001, the R~eho Cucamonga Public Library applied for and was ganted a "Families for Literacy" g~t awed of $13,000. These ~nds ~ to be used to suppo~ a literacy progm desiged to halt the cycle of illiteracy by working with preschool yo~gsters at risk and their fmilies and caregivers. ADmv~ of ~s ~on g pl~e ~e Fg~es for Mt~y ping. FISCAL IMPACT: No negative impact. RANCHO C UCAMONGA COMMUNITY -~ERVICE.~ StaffRepor DATE: February 21,2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR WAIVER OF FEES FOR USE OF THE EPICENTER SPECIAL EVENT AREA ON MARCH 28-APRIL 2, 2001. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce for a waiver of fees for use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on March 28-April 2, 2001. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff has received a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce for a waiver of fees for the use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on March 28-April 2, 2001. The Chamber of Commerce is working with a vendor to bring a circ de solell style circus to the Epicenter at the end of March as a fundraiser for the Chamber. The circus will be held on March 30, 31 and April 1. Two days prior to the circus will be required for set up and one day following for tear down. The event will provide a unique opportunity for our community residents to attend a performance of this caliber close to home. It is anticipated that this activity could potentially bring 8,000 community members into the City. In March 1999. City Council passed Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter. Staff has reviewed the request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and finds that the proposed event meets the criteda and standards outlined in the specified Resolution for a facility rental fee waiver but does not meet all of the criteria for a waiver of direct city service charge. The table below outlines the results of this analysis. The requesting organization must conduct business in the City. Yes The organization must be a non-profit organization with a City business license. Yes The proposed event may not limit attendance on the basis of any discriminatory Yes criteria, is not designed to induce membership into the organization or financial CITY COUNCIL/V~EETING APPROVAL WAIVER OF FEES FOR CHAMBER'S USE OF EPICENTER FEBRUARY 21,2001 suppor~ for the organization and is intended to appeal to 811 residents of the Oily. The proposed event is not antioipated to ceuse signi~c:ant damage to the fadlily, Yes All of the above c:riteria would have to be met. Yes The proposed event must provide beneftt to 8 Oily program or servioe. No The proposed event would not subjed the C;ily to foreseeable liabilily. Yes The proposed event will promote the Oily on 8 regional or greater sc:81e. Yes The event is intended to result in increased patronage to 10001 businesses or Yes involve numerous c:ommunily organizations. The event will offer Oily residents a unique c. ommunily 8c~ivily. Yes The proposed event will not c:onfiic:t with similar events. Yes The proposed event is not designed as 8 profit making ac:tivily No Due to the oommunib/beneftt of this event and the potential marketing opportunities this ac:tivi[y will provide for the Epicenter, it is recommended thin the Gity's in-direc:t oosts (tent reserve fee, building permit, plan c:hec:k permit fees and eleotri001 permit fee) 8ssooiated with this oommunily aotivi~/also be waived in addition to the rental fees. The appli00nt would remain responsible for paying the Oi~/'s direc:t expenses for personnel supervision and repairs to the parking lot from tent staking. This c:ost has been estimated at $2,02g. Upon review of the OiJy's Admission Tax Ordinance, staff finds that the Ohamber of Oommerae qualifies for 8n exemption to this fee since the Ghamber serves 8s an educetional resource for our c:ommunily's Io001 businesses. lastly, staff recommends that the Oi~ Ooundl relinquish the requirement for 8 damage seeuriC1/ deposit for this ac:tivily as adequate aomprehensive public: liabilib/and worker's oompensation insurance will be sec:ured to minimize the GiW's liabili~ exposure. FI$OAL IMPACT Should the Oi~l/Ooundl approve staffs recommendation of waiver of rental fees and in-direc:t oosts the ~s001 impac:t of this 8c:tion would be as follows: Base Rent $8,250 Tent Reserve Fee $1,000 Permits/Plan Ohec:k $ 148 Total $9,398 Resp ctf~ su ~ ~<eCev~~:~irector h~C~MMSERV~C~unci~&B~ardstCi~C~unci~StaffRep~tstChamberCircusWaiver2~21~1~d~c -2- RANCHO C UCA M ONGA ENGINEEI~ING DEPAI~TMENT Sc fRepo DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $557,510.00 FROM A PRIOR YEAR RESERVE, ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $557,501.56 ($506,819.60 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION, TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 10250015650/0-1300025 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve to appropriate $557,510.00 from a prior year reserve, accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $557,501.56 ($506,819.60 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Riverside Construction Co., for the construction of the Civic Center East Parking Lot Expansion, Located on the South Side of Civic Center Drive, East of Haven Avenue to be funded from Reserve Capital funds, Account No. 10250015650/0-1300025 and direct the City Engineer to sign the Notice of Exemption and cause it to be filed with the Clerk of the Board of the County of San Bernardino. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 6, 2001, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $525,698.20. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT February 21, 2001 Page 2 Staff has completed the Environmental Initial Study, Part I, and determined that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the Public Resources Code 21080 et seq, State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15311 .B "Small Parking Lots" et seq. ~O,Nei~l~/~' City Engineer WJO:WS:sc Attachment " 0 HILL BL i I"~ > ~ :FOOTHILL. BI - I I / ,CIVIC CENTER I ~: ARROW. RTI---j-- i~b ~-~_ PBGJECT:CMC CENTEB FAKING CITY OF LOT, EXPANSION BANCHO CUCAMONGA LIMITS: APH 208.352-72 ENGIHEEBING DIVISION EXHIBIT: VICINITY MAP BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 APPARENT LOW BIDDER ENGINEERS COST CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION ESTIMATE Riverside Construction Laird Construction Vance Corporation UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT I LS Clearing. Grubbing & Removals (including Sawcutting) $10.000.00 $10.000.00 $25.000.00 $25.000.00 $42.500.00 $42,500.00 $33,300.00 $33.300.00 2a. 3127 CY Unclassified Excavation $22.00 $68.794.00 $6.00 $18.762.00 $7.50 $23,452.50 $3.44 $10.756.88 2b. 1279 CY Unclassified Fill $15.00 $19.185.00 $6.00 $7.674.00 $2.00 $2,558.00 $3.44 $4.399.76 3. 1500 TON Crushed Aggregate or Sla~ Base $15.00 $22.500.00 $16.00 $24.000.00 $13.50 $20,250.00 $19.50 $29.250.00 4. 1350 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $30.00 $40.500.00 $45.00 $60.750.00 $35.00 $47,250.00 $38.00 $51.30000 5. LS Trash Enclosure - Brick Veneer $ll,000.00 $I1.000.00 $12.000.00 $12,000.00 $21.750.00 $21,750.00 $20.250.00 $20.250.00 6. EA Undersidewalk Drain $1.000.00 $i.000.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $3.150.00 $3.150.00 7. 2146 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb $7.00 $14.980.00 $6.50 $13,910.00 $10.25 $21.935.00 $10.00 $21.400.00 8. 513 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $1000 $5.130.00 $7.50 $3.847.50 $11.50 $5,899.50 $13.00 $6.669.00 9. 504 LF 6" Curb Landinn $7.00 $3.528.00 $4.00 $2.016.00 $7.50 $3.780.00 $11.50 $5.796.00 10. 680 SF 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach $2.75 $1.870.00 $4.00 $2.720.00 $3.50 $2.380.00 $4.50 $3.060.00 ll. 2296 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.50 $5.725.00 $2.50 $5.725.00 $2.50 $5.725.00 $2.35 $5.381.50 12. LS PC.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $150.00 $150.00 $750.00 $750.00; $625.00 $625.00 12a. 297 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $5.00 $1.485.00 $3.00 $891.00 $9.50 $2.821.501 $8.00 $2,376.00 13. 1334 LF 48" Tubular Steel Fence $55.00 $73.370.00 $35.00 $46,690.00 $35.00 $46,690.001 $33.50 $44,689.00 14. 111 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $20.00 $2.220.00 $30.00 $3,330.00 $25.00 $2.775.0( $26.00 $2,886.00 15. LS Automatic Irrigation Sysytem $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $65,000.00, $65,000.00 $67.500.00 $67,500.0( $66,500.00, $66,500.00 16. 34141 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.20 $6.828.20 $0.10 $3,414.10 $0.10 $3,414.1( $0A0~ $3,414.10 17. LS Maintenance Period $1,800.00 $1.800.00 $3,500.00, $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.0( $3,900.00, $3,900.00 18. 3605 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $18.00 $64.890.00 $13.00 $46,865.00 $13.75 $49.568.7.~ $13.60, $49,028.00 19. 68 EA 15 Gal. Tree $100.00 $6.800.00 $80.00 $5,440.00 $85.00 $5,780.0( $85.00 $5,780.00 20. 1C EA 24" Box Tree $250.00 $2,500.00 $230.00 $2.300.00 $250.00 $2.500.0( $250.00 $2,500.00 21. 183 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $7.00 $1.281.00 $5.00 $915.00 $10.00 $1.830.0( $26.00 $4,758.00 22. 150C SF Cobblestones/Boulers $10.00 $15.000.00 $6.00 $9.000.00 $6.00 $9.000.00~ ' $6.50 $9,750.00 23. 38C CY 4" Shredded Mulch $30.00 $11.400.00 $15.00 $5.700.00 $16.00 $6,080.00' $15.80 $61004.00 24. EA Brooks Catch Basin 1218 $200.00 $400.00 $500.00 $1.000.00 $500.00 $1.000.00 $210.00 $420.00 25. LS Relocate Existinn 2" Meter & Pressure Reducer/Backfloxv P $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2,500.00 $2.420.00 $2.420.00 26. LS Traffic Striping & Signinn $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $3.250.00 $3.250.00: $2.550.00 $2.550.00 27. EA Information Signs $200.00 $400.00 $200.00 $400.00 $200.00 $400.00i $184.00 $368.00 28. 17C LF SCE Conduit. Pullboxes & Pullropes $52.00 $8,840.00 $80.00 $13.600.00 $67.50 $11.475.00! $19.40 $3,298.00 29. LS Parking Lot Lighting Svstem $20.000.00 $20,000.00 $57,000.00 $57.000.00 $52,750.00 $52,750.0( $50.500.00 $50,500.00 30. LS Electrical Services $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00~ $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.0( $21,000.00 $21,000.00 31. LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers &Stations $5.000.00, $5,000.00 $15,000.00~ $15,000.00 $12,250.00 $12,250.0( $21,500.00 $21,500.00 32. LS Access Control System/Gate $8,400.00m $8,400.00 $12,000.00~ $12,000.00 $2.750.00 $2,750.0( $16,300.00~ $16,300.00 33. LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull Boxes $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.001 $12,000.00 $10,000.(30: $10,000.0( $8,800.001 $8,800.00 34. 18~ EA Concrete Wheel Stops $2.00 $372.00 $20.00i $3,720.00 $20.00 $3,720.00: $21.00; $3,906.00 TOTAI_ $5251698.20 ' $506.819.60 $516~284.35 , $5271985.24 Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 Fleming Enviromnental CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION Apex Construction Los Angeles Engineering Matich Corporation Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT ;DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing. Grubbing & Removals (incluc $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.013 $52.000.00 $52.000.00 $521000.00 $57.504.49 $57.504.49 $36.600.00 $36,600.0C 2a. 3127 CY Unclassified Excavation $11.00 $34,397.00 $34.397.06 $8.25 $25.797.75 $25,797.75 $3.50 $10.944.50 $8.00 $25,016.0C 2b. 1279 CY Unclassified Fill $6.00 $7.674.00 $7.674.06 $5.20 $6.650.80 $6.650.80 $1.00 $1,279.00 $5.00 $6,395.0C 3. 1500 TON Crushed A~gre~ate or Slag Base $20.00 $30.000.00 $30,000.06 $17.19, $25.785.00 $25,785.00 $18.00 $27,000.00 $17.00 $25.500.0t3 4. 1350 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $53.50 $72.225.00 $72.225.06 $41.31 $55.768.50 $55,768.50 $36.00 $48,600.00 $41.00 $55.350.06 5. I LS Trash Enclosure - Brick Veneer $17.500.00 $17,500.00 $17.500.06 $14.000.00 $14.000.00 $14.000.00 $21.000.00 $21.000.00 $18.900.00 $18,900.06 6. l EA Undersidewalk Drain $2.000.00 $2.000.00 $2.000.06 $1.250.00 $1.250.00 $1,250.00 $2.200.00 $2,200.00 $1.000.00 $1.000.06 7. 2140 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb $13~00 $27.820.00 $27.820.06 $8.20 $17.548.00 $17.548.00 $6.25 $13.375.00 $9~50 $201330.06 8. 513 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $22.50 $11.54250 $11.542.56 $11.10 $5.694.30 $5.694.30 $12.00 $6.156.00 $10.00 $5.130.06 9. 504 LF 6" Curb Landin~ $5~00 $2.520.00 $2,520~06 $5.60 $2.822.40 $2.822.40 $6.50 $3.276.00 $9.00 $4.536.06 10. 680 SF 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach $8.00 $5.440.00 $5.440.00 $4.15 $2.820.00 $2,822.00 $4.50 $3.060.00 $3.50 $2.380.06 11. 2290 SF ~4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $4~00 $9.I60.00 $9,160.06 $2.70 $6.183.00 $6.183.00 $3.00 $6,870.00 $2.00 $4.580.06 I2. 1 LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $600.00 $600.00 $600.06 $560.00 $560.00 $560.00 $750.00 $750.00 $400.00 $400.06 12a. 297 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $8.00 $2,376.00 $2,376.06 $4.80 $1.429.60 $1.425.60 $8.00 $2,376.00 $5.00 $1.485.06 13. 1334 LF 18" Tubular Steel Fence $37.00 $49,358.00 $49,358~06 $35.84 $47,810.56 $47,810.56 $36.00 $48,024.00 $37.00 $49,358.06 14. 111 LF 2" DiameterP.V.C. Pipe $1.750.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.06 $31.00 $3,441.00 $3,441.00 $19.00 $2,109.00 $20.00 $2.220~06 15. 1 LS A. utomatic lrri~ation Sysytem $70.000.00 $70.000.00, $70,000.06 $73,000.00, $73,000.00 $73,000.00 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.06 16. 34141 SF SoiIPreparation/FineGrading $0.11 $3,755.40 1531755.51 $0.30 $10,242.30 $10,242.30 $0.11 $3,755.51 $0.20 $6.828.26 17. 1 LS Maintenance Period $4.070.00 $4.070.00 $4.070~06 $3,600.00 $3.600.00 $3,600.00 $3,960.00 $3,960.00 $3,000.00 $3.000.00 18. 3605 EA Gel. Shrub $14.50 $5227.25 $521272.50 $14.60 $52.633.00 $52.633.00 $13.90 $50,109.50 $15.00 $54.075.06 19. 68 EA 15 Gal. Tree $88.00 $5,984.00 $5,984.06 $114.00 $7.752.00 $7,752.00 $86.00 $5,848.00 $120.00 $8.160~06 20. 10 EA 24" Box Tree $253.00 $2.530.00 $2,530.06 $273.00, $2.730.00 $2.730.00 $246.00 $2,460.00 $270.00 $2.700.06 21. 183 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $11.00 $2.013.00 $2,013.06 $11.20 $2.049.60 $2,049.60 $11.00 $2,013.00 $10.00 $1.830.00 22. 1500 SF 2obblestones/Bouters $6.00 $9.000.00 $9.000.06 $7.60 $11.400.00 $11,400.00 $6.00 $9.000.00 $7.00 $10.500.00 23. 380 CY ~," Shredded Mulch $16.50 $61270.00 $6.270.06 $22.00 $8.360.00 $8,360.00 $16.00 $6,080.00 $20.00 $7.600.06 24. 2 EA Brooks Catch Basin I218 $500.00 $1,000.00 $I .000.06 $400.00 $800.00 $800.00 $214.00 $428.00 $300.00 $600.06 25. 1 LS Relocate Existing 2" Meter & Pressure $3,000.00 $3.000.00 $3~000.06 $5.000.00 $5.000.00 $5.000.00 $7.800.00 $7.800.00 $3,000.00 $3.000.00 26. 1 LS rraffic Stripin~ & Sj~nin~ $3,000.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.06 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.00 $3,245.00 $3,245.00 $2.700.00 $2.700.06 27. 2 EA [nli~rmation Signs $225.00 $450.00 $450.06 $280.00 $560.00 $560.00 $176.00 $352.00 $200.00 $400.06 28. 170 LF SCE Conduit, Pullboxes & Pullropes $21.00 $3,459.50 $31570.011 $22.40 $3.808.00 $3,808.00 $23.00 $3.910.00 $25.00 $4250.06 29. 1 LS Parking Lot Lighting System $52,932.00 $52,932.00 $52,932.06 $52,500.00, $52.500.00; $52,500.00 $68,350.00 $68,350.00 $72,000.00 $72,000.06 30. 1 LS Electrical Services $22,154.00 $22,154.00 $22,154.0t] $20.000.00i $20.000.00i $20,000.00 $12,000.00: $12,000.00 $12,000.00~ $12,000.06 31. 1 LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $22,572.00 , $22,572.00, $22,572.0t3 $7,600.00~ $7,600.00: $7,600.00 $19,700.00 $19,700.00 $17,000.00~ $17,000.06 ,2. I L8 A ce,,co.t,olEy,t,.,,Gat, $22583.00 $22,583.00 $22,58,.0 $,,000.00, $2,000.00 $24,700.00i $24,700.00 $,5,000.00i $,5,000.06 33. 1 LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull $11,385.00 $ll,385.00 $11.385.0C , . $7,700.001 $7,700.00 $4,500.00' $4,500.00 $6,000.00~ $6,000.06 34. 186 EA Concrete Wheel Stops $20.00 $3,720.00 $3.720.0C $22.00! $4,092.00~ 2t,4,092.00 $20~00 $3,720.00 $25.00~ $4,650.00 TOTAL $540,747.00! $591,623.51 ' $548,389.371 $5481385.81 ' $5541455.00 : $5561473.211 Page 2 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION Holland-Lox~ Constuction 4-Con Engineering Hillcrest Contracting Silvia Constrnction UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED NO 9T~ UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. LS Clearing. Grubbing & Removals (including Sawcuttil $43.735.00 $43,735.00 $24.000.00 $24,000.00 $29.000.00 $29.000.0C $28,250.00 $28,250.00 $28.250.00 2a. 312~ CY Unclassified Excavation $10.75 $33.615.25 $15.00 $46.905.00 $6.20 $19.387.46 $4.00 $12,508.00 $12.508.00 2b. 1278 CY Unclassified Fill $4.75 $6,075.25 $12.00 $15.348.00 $3.55 $4.540.45 $3.00 $3.837.00 $3.837.00 3. 150( TON Crushed Aggregate or Sla~ Base $14.40 $21,600.00 $17.00 $25.500.00 $20.00 $30.000.06 $19.25 $28,875.00 $28.875.00 4. 135C TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $39.30 $53.055.00 $40.00 $54.000.00 $50.00 $67.500.06 $40.00 $54,000.00 $54.000.00 5. LS Trash Enclosure - Brick Veneer $18.355.00 $18,355.00 $16.000.00 $16,000.00 $13.000.00 $13.000.0{3 $17.598.00 $17.598.00 $17.598.00 6. EA UndersidewalkDrain $2.140.00 $2.140.00 $1.250.00 $1.250.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $2.400.00 $2.400.00 $2.400.00 7. 214C LF 6" P.C.C. Curb $10.00 $21.400.00 $10.00 $21.400.00 $9.00 $19.260.06 $6.00 $12.84000 $12.840.00 8. 512 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $12.50 $6.412.50 $12.00 $6.156.00 $14.00 $7.182.06 $9.00 $4.617.00 $4.617.00 9. 504 LF 6" Curb Landing $8.05 $4.057.20 $7.00 $3.528.00 $3.60 $1.814.46 $5.00 $2.020.00 $21520.00 10. 68( SF 8" P.C.C. Drivewav Approach $4.45 $3.026.00 $5.00 $3.400.00 $4.70 $3.196.013 $3.85 $2.618.00 $2.618.00 11. 229( SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.65 $6.068.50 $2.25 $5.152.50 $3.00 $6.870.06 $2.20 $5.038.00 $5,038.00 12. LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $1.260.00 $1.260.00 $650.00 $650.00 $480.00 $480.013 $640.00 $640.00 $640.00 12a. 295 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $10.95 $3,252.15 $10.00 $2.970.00 $660 $1.960.26 $7.00 $2.079.00 $2.079.00 13. 1334 LF 48" Tubular Steel Fence $31.50 $42,021.00 $38.00 $50.692.00 $33.60, $44.822.46 $34.95 $46.623.30 $46,623.30 14. 111 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $31.25 $3,468.75 $25.00 $2.775.00: $33.00 $3,663.06 $24.50 $2,719.50 $2,719.50 15. LS Automatic Irrigation Sysytem $67,727.00 $67,727.00 $77.000.00~ $77.000.00! $87.000.00, $87.000.06 $74.000.00, $74,000.00. $74,000.00 16. 34141 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Gradinn $0.11 $3,755.51 $0.15 $5.121.15 $0.23 $7.852.43 $0.37 $12,632.17 $12,632.17 17. LS Maintenance Period $3.960.00 $3.960.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $1.900.00 $1.900.013 $2.425.00 $2.425.00 $2.425.00 18. 3605 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $13.90 $50,109.50 $15.00 $54.075.00 $15.00 $54.075.06 $11.30 $40,736.50 $40,736.50 19. 6~ EA 15 Gal. Tree $85.60 $5.820.80 $100.00 $61800.00 $89.00 $6.052.06 $118.00 $8,024.00 $81024.00 20. 1( EA 24" Box Tree $246.00 $2.460.00 $300.00 $3,000.00 $240.00 $2.400.013 $235.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 21. 185 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $10.70 $1.958.10 $9.00 $1.647.00 $8.00 $1.464.06 $10.00 $1.830.00 $1.830.00 22. 1500 SF Cobblestones/Boulers $6.00 $9.000.00 $8.00 $12.000.00 $9.00 $13.500013 $20.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 23. 380 CY 4" Shredded Mulch $16.05 $6.099.00 $16.00 $6.080.00 $22.30 $8.474.06 $31.00 $11,780.00 $11.780.00 24. 2 EA Brooks Catch Basin 1218 $214.00 $428.00 $300.00 $600.00 $46000 $920.06 $720.00 $1.440.00 $1.440.00 25. I LS Relocate Existing 2" Meter & Pressure Reducer/BacI $7.51200 $7.512.00 $1.300.00 $1.300.00 $4.000.00 $4.000.00 $9.450.00 $9,450.00 $9.450.00 26. 1 LS Traffic Striping & Si~njng $2.600.00 $2.600.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.06 $2.550.00 $2,550.00 $2.550.00 27. 2 EA Information Signs $188.00 $376.00 $200.00 $400.00 $20000 $400.013 $185.00 $370.00 $370.00 28. 170 LF SCE Conduit, Pullboxes & Pullropes $26.15 $4.445.50 $75.00 $12.750.00 $20.00 $3.400.06 $85.00 $14,450.00 $14,450.00 29. 1 LS Parking Lot Lightin~ System $51,490.00 $51.490.00 $55,000.00~ $55,000.00 $63.000.00, $63,000.0(3 $59.685.00 $59,685.00~ $59.685.00 30. 1 LS Electrical Services $21,550.00 ~ $21.550.00 $15,000.001 $15,000.00 $12,500.00: $12,500.013 $15,500.00! $15,500.00~ $15.500.00 31. 1 LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $21,956.00 ~ $21,956.00 $10,500.001 $10,500.00 $15,000.00, $15,000.00 $25,000.00, $25,000.00~ $25.000.00 32. 1 LS ~ccess Control System/Gate $16,617.00 I $16,617.00 $3,500.001 $3,soo.oo $16,000.00; $16,000.06 $11,330.00: $11,330.00~ $11,330.00 33. 1 LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull Boxes $8,935.00 $8,935.00 $9,000.00r $9,000.00 $5.000.00~ $5.000.06 $13,000.00~ $13,000.001 $13,000.00 34. 186 EA 2oncreteWheel Stops $21.40 ! $3,980.40 $20.00! $3,720.00 $21.00~ $3.906.013 $21.00~ $3,906.001 $3,906.00 TOTAL I $5601321.41 , $5631219.65 , $5651019.28 , $567,121.47, $5671621.47 BID SUMMARy FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION Terra-Cal Construction Adams/Mallory Construction Metro Builders UNIT BID CORRECTEl3 UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearin~, Grubbing & Removals (includin~ Sawcut $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $16.000.0C $26.250.25 $26,250.25 $26.250.25 $30.000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 2a. 3127 CY Unclassified Excavation $9.00 $281143.00 $28,143.0C $11.15 $34.866.05 $34,866.05 $4.00 $12,508.00 $12,508.00 2b. 1279 CY Unclassified Fill $3.00 $3,837.00 $3,837.0C $17.40 $22,254.60 $22,254.60 $5.50 $7.034.00 $7.034.50 3. 1500 TON Crushed Aggregate or Sla~ Base $15.00 $22,500.00 $22.500.0C $16.30 $24,450.00 $24,450.00 $18.00 $27.000.00 $27.000.00 4. 1350 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $53.00 $71.550.00 $71.550.0C $48.00 $64,800.00 $64.800.00 $50.00 $67.500.00 $67.500.00 5. 1 LS Frash Enclosure -Brick Veneer $17.000.00 $17.000.00 $17.000.0C $17.550.00 $17,550.00 $17.550.00 $15.000.00 $15.000.00 $15.000.00 6. 1 EA lndersidewalk Drain $2.700.00 $2,700.00 $2.700.0C $855.00 $855.00 $855.00 $2,500.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 7. 2140 LF 5" P.C.C. Curb $8.50 $18.190.00 $18A90.0C $1U00 $23,540.00 $23.540.00 $12.00 $25.680.00 $25.680.00 8. 513 LF 5" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $12.00 $6.156.00 $6.156.0C $13.00 $6,669.00 $6.669.00 $15.00 $7.695.00 $7.695.00 9. 504 LF 5" Curb Landin~ $8.00 $4.032.00 $4.032.0C $12.00 $6.048.00 $6.048.00 $6.00 $3.024.00 $3~024.00 10. 680 SF !~" PC.C. Driveway Approach $4.00 $2,720.00 $2.720.0C $6.00 $4,080.00 $4.080.00 $5.50 $3,740.00 $3,740.00 11. 2290 SF a," P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.20 $5.038.00 $5.038.0C $3.20 $7.328.00 $7.328.00 $3.20 $7,328.00 $7,328.00 12. 1 LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $1.000.0C $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 12a. 297 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $3.50 $1.039.50 $1.039.5C $15.00 $4.455.00 $4.455.00 $5.50 $1.633.00 $1~633.50 13. 1334 LF 48" Tubular Steel Fence $42.00 $561028.00 $56.028.0C $40.50 $54,027.00 $54.027.00 $53.00 $701702.00 $701702.00 14. 111 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $14.00 $1,554.00 $1.554.0C $18.00 $1,998.00 $1.998.00 $45.00, $4,995.00 $4,995.00! 15. i LS Automatic Irrigation Sysytem $78,000.00 $78,000.00 $78,000.0C $75,071.00 $75,071.00 $75,071.00 $90,000.00, $90,000.00 $90,000.0( 16. 34141 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.24 $7,473.84 $81193.84 $0.10, $3,414.10 $3,414.10 $0.25 $8,535.00 $8.535.25 17. 1 LS Maintenance Period $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0C $4,700.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00 $6,000.00 $6.000.00 $6.000.0( 18. 3605 EA Gal. Shrub $12.00 $43,260.00 $43.260.0C $14.80 $53,354.00 $53.354.00 $18.00 $64,890.00 $64.890.0( 19. 68 EA 15 Gal. Tree $80.00 $5,440.00 $5.440.0C $91.00 $6.188.00 $6.188.00 $68.00 $4.624.00 $4.624.0( 20. 10 EA 24" Box Tree $220.00 $21200.00 $2.200.0C $262.00 $21620.00 $2.620.00 $350.00 $3.500.00 $3.500.0( 21. 183 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $7.00 $1,281.00 $U281.0C $6.00 $1.098.00 $1.098.00 $10.00 $1.830.00 $1.830.0( 22. 1500 SF Cobblestones/Boulers $8.00 $12.000.00 $12.0000C $6.40 $9.600.00 $9.600.00 $15.00 $22.500.00 $22.500.0( 23. 380 CY 4" Shredded Mulch $2200 $8,360.00 $8,360.0C $17.00 $6,460.00 $6.460.00 $25.00 $9.500.00 $9,500.0I 24. 2 EA Brooks Catch Basin I218 $1.000.00 $2,000.00 $2.000.0C $1. 100.00 $2.200.00 $2.200.00 $650.00 $1.300.00 $1.300.0i 25. 1 LS Relocate Existing 2" Meter & Pressure Reducer/Ba $700.00 $700.00 $700.0C $2,620.00 $2.620.00 $2.620.00 $6.000.00 $6.000.00 $6,000.0( 26 1 LS Traffic Striping & Signinn $3.000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0C $2.770.00 $2,770.00 $2.770.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0( 27 2 EA Information Signs $220.00 $440.00 $440.0C $200.00, $400.00 $400.00 $300.00 $600.00 $600.0C 28 170 LF SCE Conduit. Pullboxes & Pullropes $23.00 $3,910.00 $3.910.0C $24.50 $4.165.00 $4,165.00 $27.000.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.0C 29 I LS Parking Lot Lighting System $64,000.00 $64,000.00~ $64,000.0C $51,432.00, $51,432.00 $51,432.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.0C 30 1 LS Electrical Services $25,000.00: $25,000.001 $25,000.0C $15,690.00, $15,690.00~, $15,690.00 $15,000.00, $15,000.00, $15,000.0C 3l 1 LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $26.000.00 T $26,000.001 $26,000.0C $7,100.00i $7,100.00 $7,100.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00~ $28.000.0C 32,L8A ce,sContro, System, ate$20,000.00, : 00: 00.0000 $20,000.0($24,270.00 $24,270.00, $24,270.00$4,000.00 $4,000.00' $4.000.0( 33 LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull Boxes $10.000.00 I . $10,000.0C $4 800.00Z $4,800.00', $4,800.00 $25,000.00~ $25,000.00~ $25.000.0C 34.. 186 EA Concrete Wheel Stops $22.00 i $4,092.00! $4,092.0C $23.00: $4,278.001 :$4,278.00 $25.00, $4,650.00 $4.650.0C TOTAL I $579,644.341 $5801364.34 , $581,081.00, $5811801.00 . $598,018.00i $6981019.25 ~_~ Page 4 BID SUMNIARY FOIl BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION Inland Asphalt K.A.S. Equipment LMT Enterprises GMC Engineering UNIT UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID CORRECTEl3 NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing. Grubbing & Removals (includ $13.685.00 $13.685.00 $21.800.00 $21.800.0C $8.000.00 $8.000.00 $8,000.00 $25.480.00 $25,480.00 $25.480.0C 2a. 3127 CY Unclassified Excavation $13.10 $40.963.70 $11.00 $34.397.06 $14.04 $43.903.08 $43,903.08 $14.55 $45.498.00 $451497.85 2b. 1279 CY Undassified Fill $8.66 $11.076.14 $15.00 $19A85.0(3 $7.50 $9.592.50 $9.592.50 $11.00 $14,069.00 $14,069.0C 3. 1500 TON Crushed Aggregate or Slae Base $19.00 $28.500.00 $17.00 $25.500.0(3 $15.17 $22.755.00 $22.755.00 $14.05 $21.075.00 $21,075.0C 4. 1350 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $42.00 $56,700.00 $40.00 $54,000.0(3 $43.92 $59.292.00 $59.292.00 $45.00 $60.750.00 $60.750.0C 5. 1 LS FrashEnclosure-BrickVeneer $16.178.00 $16,178.00 $20.800.00 $20,800.0(3 $25,154.00 $25.154.00 $25.154.00 $20,421.00 $20.421.00 $20.421.0C 6. 1 EA Undersidewalk Drain $4,044.00 $4,044.00 $600.00 $600.0(3 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $2.214.00 $2.214.00 $2.214.0C 7. 2140 LF 5" P.C.C. Curb $10.86 $23,240.40 $9.00 $191260.0(3 $11.50 $24.610.00 $24.610.00 $12.60 $26.964.00 $26.964.0C 8. 513 LF 5" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $14.24 $7.305.12 $14.00 $7.182.0(3 $14.00 $7.182.00 $7.182.00 $12.90 $6.618.00 $6,617.71] 9. 504 LF 5" Curb Landing $8.88 $4.475.52 $900 $4~536.0(3 $6.50 $3.276.00 $3.276.00 $5.70 $2.873.00 $21872.81] 10. 680 SF 2" P.C.C. Driveway Approach $4.96 $3,372.80 $400 $2.720.0(3 $3.35 $2.278.00 $2.278.00 $3.80 $2.584.00 $2.584.0C 11. 2290 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.65 $6,068.50 $3.00 $6,870.0(3 $2.26 $5.175.40 $5.175.40 $2.50 $5.725.00 $5.725.0C 12. 1 LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $866.00 $866.00 $630.00 $630.0(3 $1,000.00 $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $648.00 $648.00 $648.13(] 12a. 297 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $9.08 $2,696.76 $5.00 $1,485.0(3 $5.00 $1.485.00 $1.485.00 $5.00 $1.485.00 $1,485.0C 13. 1334 LF ~.8" Tubular Steel Fence $38.94 $51,945.96 $53.00 $70,702.0(3 $38.10 $50.825.40 $50.825.40 $30.00 $40.020.00 $40.020.0C 14. 111 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $38.00 $4,218.00 $25.00 $2,775.0(3 $20.00 $2.220.00~ $2.220.00 $19.75 $2,192.00 $2,192.25 15. 1 LS AutomaticlrrigationSvsytem $86,074.00 $861074.00 $671300.00 $671300.0(3 $711787.00 $71.787.00~ $71.787.00 $96.176.00 $96,176.00 $96.176.0(3 16. 34141 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.17 $5,803.97 $0.25 $8,535.25 $0.17 $5.803.97, $5.803.97 $0.24 $8,194.00 $81193.84 17 1 LS Maintenance Period $2,311.00 $2,311.00 $4.500.00 $4,500.0(3 $4,984.00 $4.984.00 $4.984.00 $1.944.00 $1,944.00 $1.944.0(3 18 3605 EA Gel. Shrub $16.18 $58,328.90 $15.00 $54,075.0(3 $18.18 $65,538.90 $65.538.90 $15.55 $56,058.00 $561057.75 19 68 EA 15 Gal. Tree $86.67 $5.893.56 $110.00 $7,480.0(3 $113.00 $7.684.00 $7.684.00 $92.00 $6,256.00 $6.256.0(3 20 10 EA 24" Box Tree $213.00 $2.130.00 $336.00 $3.360.0(3 $358.00 $3.580.00 $3.580.00 $248.40 $2,484.00 $2.484.0(3 21 183 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $6.93 $I.268.19 $10.00 $1.830.0(3 $750 $1.372.50 $1.372.50 $11.55 $2,114.00 $2d13.65 22 1500 SF Cobblestones/Boulers $10.40 $15.600.00 $16.00 $24.000.0(3 $11.41 $17.115.00, $17.115.00 $8.65 $12.975.00 $12.975.0(3 23 380 CY 4.,, Shredded Mulch $23.11 $8.781.80 $54.00 $20.520.0(3 $57.22 $21.743.60 $21.743.60 $22.95 $8.721.00 $8.721.0(3 24 2 EA Brooks Catch Basin t218 $866.00 $1.732.00 $801.00 $1.602.0(3 $750.00 $1.500.00 $1.500.00 $1.275.00 $2.550.00 $2.550.0(3 25 LS Relocate Existinn 2" Meter & Pressure I $3.375.00 $3.375.00 $4.600.00 $4.600.0(3 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $5.940.00 $5.940.00 $5.940.0(3 26.[ LS Traffic Stripin~ & Signing $2.808.10 $2.808.10 $2.269.00 $2.269.0(3 $2,250.00 $2.250.00 $2.250.00 $2.625.00 $2,625.00 $2.625.0(3 27.! 2 EA Information Signs $202.23 $404.46 $200.00 $400.0(3 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 $189.00 $378.00 $378.0(3 28. 170 LF SCE Conduit, Pullboxes & Pullropes $73.89 $12.561.30 $19.00 $3.230.0(3 $17.50 $2.975.00 $2.975.00 $70.52 $11,988.00 $111988.40 29. LS Parking Lot Lighting Svstem $57.155.86 $57.155.86 $50.526.00 $50.526.0(3 $118,000.00 $118,000.00, $118,000.00 $86.630.00 $86,630.00, $86,630.08 30. LS Electrical Services $15.178.77 , $15,178.77 $21,147.001 $21,147.0(3 $6,780.00 $6,780.001 $6.780.00 $18.153.00~ $18,153.002 $18,153.0(3 31. LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $27.087.55 '. $27,087.55 $21,546.00! $21.546.0(3 $17,597.00 $17,597.00! $17.597.00 $7,733.00~ $7,733.00~ $7,733.08 32. LS Access Control System/Gate $17,114.40 i $17,114.40 $21,557.00! $21.557.0(3 $6,500.00; $6,500.001 $6.500.00 $14,341.00; $14,341.00: $14,341.00 33. LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull $9,995.22 I $9,995.22 $10,868.00~ $10,868.0(3 $4,480.00; $4,480.00; $4.480.00 $9,598.00[ $9,598.00~ $9,598.0B 34. 186 EA Concrete Wheel Stops $21.91 I $4,075.26 $22.00~ $4,092.0C $17.501 $3,255.00~ $3,255.00 $21.601 $4,018.00, $41017.611 TOTAL I $6131015'24 , $625~879.25 , $635,734.35~ $635~794.35 ! $636,492.00! $6371490.84 Page 5 BID SUi~IMARy FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION E.G.N. Construction E.A. Mendoza Contracting Ortiz Enterprises, Incorporated UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID CORRECTEE UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AiMOUNT COST AMOUNT ANIOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS ~Iearin~. Grubbing & Removals (including Sawcut $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $23.000.0( $34.051.00 $34.051.00 $34.051.0C $16.500.00 $16,500.00 $16.500.00 2a. 3127 CY Unclassified Excavation $9.50 $29,706.50 $29.706.5( $15.00 $46.905.00~ $46.905.0C $12.00 $37,524.00 $37.524.00 2b. 1279 CY kinclassified Fill $5.00 $6.395.00 $6.395.0( $11.50 $14.708.50, $14.708.50 $7.00 $81953.00 $8~953.00 3. 1500 TON 2rushed Aggregate or Slag Base $18.43 $27.645.00 $27.645.0( $21.00 $31,500.00~ $31.500.00 $20.00 $30.000.00 $30~000.00 4. 1350 TON ~.sphalt Concrete Pavement $45.81 $61.843.50 $61.843.5{2 $41.00 $55.350.00 $55.350.00 $51.00 $68.850.00 $68,850.00 5. 1 LS Frash Enclosure - Brick Veneer $26.500.00 $26.500.00 $26.500.0{2 $19.500.00 $19.500.00Z $19.500.00 $24.100.00 $24.100.00 $24.100.00 6. 1 EA Undersidewalk Drain $2.000.00 $2.000.00 $2.000.0C $1.800.00 $1.800.00 $1.800.00 $3.750.00 $3.750.00 $3,750.00 7. 2140 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb $11.53 $24.674.20 $24.674.2C $11.00 $23.540.00 $23.540.00 $10.50 $22,470.00 $22,470.0( 8. 513 LF 6" P.CC. Curb & 12" Gutter $12.41 $6.366.33 $6.366.32 $14.00 $7.182.00 $7.182.00 $12.00 $6.156.00 $6.156.0( 9. 504 LF 6" Curb Landing $6.17 $3,109.68 $3.109.68 $7.50 $3.780.00 $3,780.00 $4.50 $2.268.00 $2.268.0( 10. 680 SF 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach $3.53 $2.400.40 $2.400.4C $4.00 $2.720.00, $2.720.00 $6.00 $4.08000 $4.080.0C 11. 2290 SF 4" PC.C. Sidewalk $2.00 $4.580.00. $4.580.0{3 $l.90 $4.351.00 $4.351.00 $3.00' $6.870.00 $6,870.0C 12. 1 LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $1.200.00 $1.200.00 $1.200.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.0C 12a. 297 SF P.C.C. Spandrel $3.95 $1.173.15; $1.173.15 $6.50~ $1.930.50 $1,930.50 $7.00: $2.079.00 $2,079.00 13. 1334 LF 48" Tubular Steel Fence $41.75 $55.694.50~ 955.694.50 $45.00 $60.030.00~ $60.030.00 $41.00, 954.694.00 $54.694.00 14. 1112 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $34.00: $3.774.00i $3.774.00 $21.00 $2,331.001 $2.331.00 $70.00 $7.770.00~ $7,770.00 I5.LsAuto,naOcIrrigationSysytem$80,00O.0O, $$8103, .08011$80,00O.0G$95,000.00: 995,000.00' $95.000.00$80,0O0.00' 980.000.00 $80,000.00 16. 34141 SF SoiIPreparation/FineGrading $0.411 , . $13,997.81 $0.10; $3,414.10! $3,414.10 $0.10} $3,414.001 $3~414.10 17. LS Maintenance Period $ 50 00~ $2,750.001 $2,750.00 92,500.00 $2.500.001 $2,500.00 $41600.00~ $4.600.00! $4,600.00 18. 3605 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $12.70! $45,783.50~ $45.783.50 $14.00 $50.470.00~ $50,470.00 $I6.00. $57.680.00! $57.680.00 19. 6~ EA 15 Gah Tree $133.00 i $9.044.001 $9.044.00 $80.00 $5.440.00! $5.440.00 $100.00~ $6.800.00: $6.800.00 20. 1C EA 24" Box Tree $265.00 ! $2.650.00', $2.650.00 $185.007 $1.850.00. $1.850.00 $285.002 $2.850.00 $2,850.00 21. 182 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $11.50 $2.104.50 $2.104.50 $9.00 $1.647.00 $1.647.00 $15.00 $2,745.00 $2,745.00 22. 150C SF Cobblestones/Boulers $1765 $26.475.001 $26.475.00 $11.00 $16.500.007 $16.500.00 $7.00: $10,500.00 $10,500.00 23. 38C CY 4" Shredded Mulch $35.50 $13.490.00 $13.490.00 $28.00 $i0,640.00 $10.640.00 $19.00 $7.220.00 $7.220.00 24. EA Brooks Catch Basin 1218 $I ,000.00 $2.000.00 $2.000.00 $300.00 $600.00 $600.00 $400.00 $800.00 $800.00 25. LS Relocate Existing 2" Meter & Pressure Reducer/Ba $6.930.00 $6.930.00 $6.930.00 $3,000.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.00 26. LS Traffic Striping &Signing $3.750.00 $3.750.00! $3.750.00 $8.000.00 $8.000.00 $8.000.00 $2.900.00 $2.900.00 $2.900.00 27. EA Inl~rmation Signs $210.00 $420.00~ $420.00 $1.000.00 $2.000.00. $2,000.00 $700.00 $1.400.00 $1,400.00 28. 17C LF SCE Conduit. Pullboxes & Pullropes $21.75 $3.697.50~ $3.697.50 $66.00 $11.220.002 $11.220.00 $66.00. $11.220.002 $11,220.00 29. LS Parking Lot Lighting System 956.600.00 ~ $56,600.001 $56.600.00 $80.200.00! $80.200.00; $80.200.00 $50,375.00i $50.375.00 $50.375.00 30. LS Electrical Services $23.700.00 I $23,700.001 923,700.00 $16.800.00[ $16,800.00~ $16,800.00 $34,500.00 $34,500.001 $34,500.00 4 31. LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $24.100.00 ~ $24,100.00 $24,100.00 $6 00 00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00~ $20,000.00 . · I 32.Ls cesscontrolsyste ate924,I00.0o! 924,I00.0o$24,i00.0092,500.00! $2,500.0092,50o.00913.400.00 F6,goog.00gi$I3,40o.00 33. LS utu eSe u ityS te ,Cond it&P BBo es912,I75.00 912,I75.0O$I2,175.0O99,100.00, 99,,00.0O$9,100.00926, 0205 ,. $26,000.00 34.18~EAConcrete Wheel Stops$23.50 ] $4,371.0O$4,371.00$5.00 $930.00$930.00[$4.650.00l $zl,650.00 TOTAl ] $638.200.60 $638,200.57 $6381489.10 9638~490.10 ] $6401418.00] $640~418.10 Page 6 BID SUMMARy FOP, BID OPENING FEBI~.UARY 6, 2001 Scan Malek Engineering & CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION Constrution, Inc. Alpha Engineering Co., Inc. Gentry Brothers, Inc. UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing. Grubbing & Removals (including Sawcutti~ $30.000.00 $30.000.00 $40.000.00 $40,000.00: $40.000.00 $78,000.00 $78,000.00 $78.000.0C 2a. 3127 CY Unclassi~ed Excavation $15.00 $46.905.00 $6.00 $18,762.00 $18.762.00 $15.00 $46,905.00 $46.905.0C 2b. 1279 CY Unclassified Fill $I5.00 $19.185.00 $5.00 $6.395.00 $6,395.00 $10.00 $12,790.00 $12.790.0C 3. 1500 TON Crashed Aggregate or Slas: Base $15.001 $22.500.00 $22.00 $33.000.00 $33,000.00 $15.00 $22.500.00 $22.500.0C 4. 1350 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $50.00 $67.500.00 $55.00 $74.250.00 $74,250.00 $46.00 $62.100.00 $62.100.0( 5. 1 LS Trash Enclosure Brick Veneer $20.000.00! $20.000.00 $9.000.00 $9.000.00 $9,000.00 $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $23.000.0C 6. 1 EA Undersidewalk Drain $1.500.00 $1.50000 $2.000.00 $2,000.00 $21000.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.500.0C 7. 2140 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb $9.50 $20.33000 $9.50 $20.330.00 $20.330.00 $11.00 $23.540.00 $23.540.0C 8. 513 LF 6" P.C.C. Curb & 12" Gutter $11.30 $5.796.90 $15.00 $7.695.00 $7.695.00 $13.00 $6,669.00 $6.669.0C 9. 504 LF 6" Curb Landing $6.30 $3.175.20 $10.25 $5,166.00 $5.16&00 $11.00 $5.544.00 $5.544.0C 10. 680 SF 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach $4.00 $2.72000 $4.25 $2,890.00Z $2.890.00 $5.00 $3.400.00 $3.400.0C 11. 2290 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.50 $5.72500 $3.00 $6,870.00 $6.870.00 $2.25, $5.152.50 $5.152.5C 12. I LS P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $720.00 $720.00 $800.00 $800.00; $800.00 $1A00.00 $1,100.00 $1.100.0C 12a. 297 SF PC.C. Spandrel $10.00 $2.970.00 $6.00! $1,782.00. $1.782.00 $7.00 $2.079.00 $2,079.0C 13. 1334 LF 48" Tubular Steel Fence $39.00 $52,026.00 $40.00i $53,760.00 $531360.00 $44.001 $58.696.00 $58,696.0C 14. 111 LF 12" Diameter P.V.C. Pipe $25.00~ $2.775.00 $25.00. $2,775.00[ $2,775.00 $40.00~ $4.440.00~ $4,440.0C 15. 1 LS Automatic irrigation Sysytem $68.000.001 $68,000.00 $75,000.001 $75,000.00i $75,000.00 $70,O00.O01 $70,000.00? $70,000.0C 16. 34141 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.501 $17.070.50 $o.241 $8,194.00[ $81193.84 $0.311 $10,583.71~ $10,583.71 17. 1 LS Maintenance Period $2.000.00! $2.000.00 $3,600.00! $3.6oo.ool $3,600.00 $1.800.00~ $4,800.00} $1.800.06 18. 3605 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $15.00! $54.075.00 $19.00, $68.495.00! $68,495.00 $15.00~ $54,075.00, $54,075.0(] 19. 68 EA 15 Gal. Tree $190.00 $12.920.00 $108.00; $7.344.001 $7,344.00 $90.001 $6,120.00 $6,120.0~ 20. 10 EA 24" Box Tree $400.00 $4.000.00 $336.00 $3.360.00 $3,360.00 $220.00~ $2,200.00 $2,200.06 21. 183 LF P.C.C. Mow Strip $10.00 $1.830.00 $10.00 $1.830.00 $1,830.00 $3.001 $549.00 $549.06 22. 1500 SF Cobblestones/Bou[ers $15.00 $22.500.00 $12.00 $18.000.00 $18,000.00 $15.00 $22.500.00 $22.500.00 23. 380 CY 4" Shredded Mulch $35.00 $13.300.00 $40.00 $15.200.00 $15,200.00 $27.00 $10.260.00 $10.260.00 24. 2 EA Brooks Catch Basin 1218 $300.00 $600.00 $1.000.00 $2.000.00 $2.000.00 $600.00, $1.200.00 $1.200.00 25. 1 LS Relocate Existing 2" Meter & Pressure Reducer/Bacl $4.000.00 $4.000.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $2.200.00 $2.200.00 $2.200.00 26. I LS Traffic Striping & Signing $3.000.00 $3.000.00 $2.700.00 $2.700.00 $2.700.00 $3.300.00i $3.300.00 $3.300.00 27. 2 EA Information Signs $210.00 $420.00 $200.00 $400.00 $400.00 $180.00, $360.00' $360.00 28. 170 LF SCE Conduit. Pullboxes & Pullropes $97.00 $16,490.00 $26.00. $4.420.001 $4.420.00 $20.00i $3.400.00~ $3,400.00 29. 1 LS Parking Lot Lightin~ System $68,000.00~ $68,000.00 $10S.000.OO/$10S,000.001 $10S.000.00 $S2,000.00 $S2.000.001 $S2,000.00 30. I LS Electrical Services $17,700.00 [ $17,700.00 $12,880.001 $12,880.001 $12,880.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 31. 1 LS Electrical Vehicle Chargers & Stations $17,600.00 [ $17,600.00 $21,160.001 $21,160.00[ $21,160.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 32. 1 LS Access Control System/Gate $6,0OO.00 [ $6,000.00 $14,075.00] $14,075.00[ $14,075.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 33. 1 LS Future Security System, Conduit & Pull Boxes $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $4,830.00 $4,830.001 $4,83o.oo $12,000.00] $12,000.00 $12,000.00 34. 186 EA Concrete Wheel Stops $25.00 [ $4,650.00 $22.0{] $4,092.001 $4,092.00 $20.00 $3,720.00 $3,720.00 TOTAl [ $651,983.60 $664,055.00[ $663,654.84 $670,683.21 $680,683.21 Page 7 RAN HO CUCA MONGA EN~II~EERING DEPARTNENT DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-13, LOCATED AT 10370 TRADEMARK STREET, EAST OF CENTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY YOUNG HOMES, LLC It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DR 00-13, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-13, located at 10370 Trademark Street, east of Center Avenue, within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the City Planner on May 1, 2000. This project is for the construction of a 7,935 square foot office building and "design center" showroom, on a .61 acre parcel. The Developer, Young Homes, LLC, is submitting an improvement agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $7,920.00 Labor and Material Bond: $3,960.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. GITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 00-13 February 21,2001 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:VC:sc Attachments CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ~llCll~rl"Y tr~ct~t~m~c ,r~s~o~ EXHIBIT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR D.R. 00-13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Young Homes, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 10370 Trademark Street, east of Center Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as D.R. 00-13; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attomey. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the fight of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-13 February 21, 2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all hue and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the masonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed anntml assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION4: All future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levyofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: John Randall Young, Maria P .V. Young Paschel W. Young, Mae Rose Young The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 16 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5157, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 52 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 73-76 OF THE RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. [CREATE SHEET .~~2: MAP OF TRACT kFITH LMD AREAS HIGHLIGHTED] EXHIBIT "A" -- ~-- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOnTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DP~.- OO._...~' I~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit B (continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: DR 00-13 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #6 1 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessmere Assessment I.and Use lInit Type Units IJnits Factor Units Unit Revenue Command Acre 1849.01 1.0 1849.01 $352.80 $652,330.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-13) is: 0.6 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $211.68 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-13) is: 0.6 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $21.32 Annual Assessment Exhibit C (continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance DistrictNo. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment |and Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units |/nit Revenue Command Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-13) is: 0.6 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $30.84 Annual Assessment RAN hO CUCAMONGA EI~C~II~.ERI~G DEPAI~TM~I~T DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Vailbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR MDR 00-27, LOCATED ON THE TERMINUS OF MONROE COURT, NORTH OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITrED BY HOUSING ACTION RESOURCE TRUST It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving MDR 00-27, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS MDR 00-27, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), located on the terminus of Monroe Court, north of Jersey Boulevard, was approved by the City Planner on September 14, 2000. This project is for parking lot expansion. The Developer, Housing Action Resource Trust, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $4,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: $2,400.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MDR 00-27 February 21, 2001 Page 2 The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, · O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sd Attachments 6TH STRFR' 4TH STRET SAN ~ ~ 1-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR MDR 00-27 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 21, 2001, by Housing Action Resource Trust as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the terminus of Monroe Court, north of Jersey Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as MDR 00-27; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said lmprovement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subjectto approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOL, IO,,O. 0/' A P~8OLUTIO~ OF THE CITY CO~C[~ O~ Y~ C[?Y O~ A~E~TION OF CERTA~ TE~TORY TO L~DSC~E ~TENANCE DIST~CT NO. 3B ~D ST~ET LIGHT~G ~ENANCE DIST~CT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR ~R 00-27 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California CArticle XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. MDR 00-27 Febmary 21, 2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the masonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the fmancing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION4: All futumproceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy ofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: HOUSING ACTION RESOURCE TRUST The legal description of the Property is: Parcel A: Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 4594, in the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 47, page(s) 2 and 3, of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Except the Northerly 5.00 feet thereof. Said legal is made pursuant to that Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment No. 223, recorded March 6, 1986, as Instrument No. 86-059033, Official Records. Together with: Parcel 5 of Parcel Map 4594, in the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 47, page(s) 2 and 3, of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 AA',ROW /eOb'TE ~ITE ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTit COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO dqq Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: MDR 00-27 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #I ............... SLD #6 2 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L3B ............ *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B 1 1.92 3.84 1.92 1.92 Annexation Date: February 21, 2001 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance DistrictNo. 3b (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use 1Jnit Type Units Hnits Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/lnd Acre 1849.01 1.0 1849.01 $352.80 $652,330.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1.92 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $677.38 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type llnits Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1.92 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $68.24 Annual Assessment C - 1 MDR 00-27 t~0 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and llse Unit Type l lnitq 1 lnits Factor Units Unit Revenue Command Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1.92 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $98.69 Annual Assessment RAN C HO CUCAMONGA S ffRepo DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16051 AND ORDERING TO SUMMARILY VACATE A 30-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR GENERAL PUBLIC AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMI'I'I'ED BY RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, A COLORADO CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving and accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 3 and ordering the summary vacation of a 30-foot wide easement for general public and public utility purposes and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16051, located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling unites per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 10, 2000 for the development of 77 single family lots on 15.63 acres of land. The Developer, Richmond American Homes of California, a Colorado Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16051 February 21, 2001 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $1,500,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 750,000.00 Monumentation Cash Bond: $ 6,300.00 In conjunction with the processing of the final tract map, the Developer has requested the vacation of a 30-foot wide easement for general public and public utility purposes, located north of Base Line Road, east of Rochester Avenue. The said easement was dedicated on Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 5687 and recorded on May 19, 1980, and was never used. Utility companies and various City divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and were asked for comments. There were no objections to the vacation from any of the groups notified. The vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the General Plan. On February 14, 2001, the Planning Commission determined the vacation conforms to the General Plan and recommended the vacation occur. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments BASELINE ROAD HIGHLAND AVE. f PROJECTLOCATION ~ / FOOTHILL BLVD N ~ AI~DiN~ ~ ~A~ y4TH STREE N C~TY OF rr~: I/l~'l/f/IrY N,4P RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'rz~,~-- 7'~:'~/~'.r IGO~I ENGINEERING DIVISION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND TRACT MAP NO. 16051 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16051, submitted by Richmond American Homes of California, a Colorado Corporation, located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, for the development of 77 single family lots on 15.63 acres of land, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on May 10, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16051 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the fmal map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Richmond American Homes of California, a Colorado Corporation, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities submitted by said Developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16051 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ZJ/'~ ~34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16051 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID') establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 16051 February 21,2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the mounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION4: All future proceedings oftheMalntenance Districts, including the levy ofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 5687, in the City ofRancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino County, State of California, as per plat filed in Book 56 Pages 9 and 10 of Parcel Maps, records of said County and Parcel "A" of the land shown on a deed recorded on October 2, 2000, as Document No. 20000359137 of Official Records, records of said County The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 72C/GO~'I / -/_ _/./_ ,. _}{,-:- ' ' . NaV- T~hr z~Dxc2t& /,eta CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year ~Z000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and ad such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Read, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. B - TR Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: TR 16051 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #1 --- 5 + 4' ......... SLD #3 22 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L2 ...... 29,913 120 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S1 S3 L2 --- 77 77 77 77 Annexation Date: February 21,2001 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4071 1.00 4071 $422.00 $1,717,960.00 Family Multi- Unit 388 1.00 388 $422.00 $163,740.00 Family Comm/Ind. Acre 24,676 2.00 49.352 $422.00 $20,830.00 Vacant Acre 405.13 0.25 101.2825 $422.00 $42,740.00 TOTAL $192,270.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16051) is: 77 lots x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $32,494.00 Annum Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land I]~e Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Ilnit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commemial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16051) is: 77 Lots x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1,368.29 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITI0: The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use IInit Type lInits Units Factor lInits Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4,071.00 1.00 4,071.00 $47.15 $191,948.00 Family Multi- Unit 388.00 1.00 388.00 $47.15 $18,294.000 Family Commercial Acre 78.79 2.00 157.58 $47.15 $7,430.00 TOTAL $217,672.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16051) is: 77 Lots x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $3,630.55 Annual Assessment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A 30-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR GENERAL PUBLIC AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the 30-foot wide easement for general public and public utility purposes, located north of Base Line Road, east of Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said easement is unnecessary for present or prospective public and utility purposes because it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating the said 30-foot wide easement, located north of Base Line Road, east of Rochester Avenue, as described in Exhibit "D", and shown on Exhibit "E" . SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said 30-foot easement no longer constitutes a public use or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. EXglIRIT t~Z~ # RIGHT OI~WAY VACATION BBINO A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5687, RECORDED IN BOOK 56, PAGES 9 AND 10, OF PARCEL MAPS, RF. CORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF C~I-I~ORNIk DESCRIBED A~ FOLLOWS; BEG.INb?ING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; SAID POINT BEING 60.00 FEET NORTH OF TI~ CEN~,~r rare OF BASELINE ROAD; THENCE WEStERLy NORTH 87 5~ '25" WEST 829.01 FEET ALONG A L/NE PARALLEL · vn'H AND 60.00 FEET NORTH OF TItH CK~FrERUN~ OF BASELINE ROAD TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CUP, VE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 ~; TRENCH NORTHWESTERLy 3154 FE_ET ALDNG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90~' 21 '34" TO A POINT ON TEE FA..~TERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ROCHESTEK AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO, 5~87; SAID POINT ALSO BEING 44.00 FEET EAST OF THE CENTEI~LINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 5687; TItENCE NORTHERLY NORTH 00o 26'09" I~AST 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT OF CUSP TO A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTItF~kST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FI~-ET AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEAR,~; NORTH 89'33'51" WEST; THENCE SOUIH. I/.AS'rERLy 31.54 FlEeT ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CF, N'II~AL ANO LE OF 96° 21 '34"TO A POll~r 90.00 FEET NORTH OF THIE CEN'II~KLINE OF BASELINI~ ROAD;, THENCE EASTERLy SOUTH 89° 55 '25" EAST 829,02 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 90.00 FEET NORTH OF THE CENtERLINE OF BASELINE ROAD TO THE F_ASTERLy LINE OF 3AID PARCEL ! OF PAt~CEL MAP NO. 5687; (Contintt~d on Pag~ 2) THIS D(EUM~NT WAS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPItRVISION OF: ROGER GOODING, L_~. 5781 DATE LICENSE EXPIRES 6/30/04 Page I of 2 KIG!fr OF WAY VACAT/ON (Continued) THENCE SOUTH 00o 26'56" WEST 30.00 FBET ALONG ~ F~'I'~,LY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. ~687 TO THE 1~[~~[12:~, PARC]~ COMPRISE8 24,470 SQ FEET OR 0.562 ACRES. AS MOPE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON 'rHt:i A'ITACHI~ EX~!tqIT "B". THIS ~ WAS PREPAPED UNDER THE SUP1~{VISION OF: ROGBR GOODING, L.S. ~7~1 DATE LICL~SE EXPIRES Page 2 of 2 3,9;,9~00N A~VQNI")OE! 1SV] ~ "' I.- >' _1 n '- d,o I,-- -~. / ~m ArM .~0 IHOW Isv3-.,~ "' ,00'0~ 3,,60,9~.0ON. ~ .~ --- _~ ._/ ::irIN=aAV . lt:1199H001:1 "1[O ~ ,.=, I~ANCHO CUCAMONCA S Repo DATE: February 21, 2001 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT MAP 14875, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, SUBMITFED BY ARCHIBALD GARDEN VILLAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving and accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities. Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tract Map 14875, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, in the Medium Residential District (8-14 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1991, for the development of 36 condominium units on 3.56 acres of land. The Developer, Archibald Garden Villas Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 14875 February 21, 2001 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $215,700.00 Labor and Material Bond $107,850.00 Monumentation Cash Bond $ 2,450.00 Copies of the improvement agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. O/' ¢, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND TRACT MAP NO. 14875 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14875, submitted by Archibald Garden Villas Limited Partnership, A Limited Partnership, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, for the development of 36 condominium units on 3.56 acres of land, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 9, 1991 and is compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14875 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by Archibald Garden Villas Limited Partnership, A Limited Partnership, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities submitted by said Developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14875 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESO'U ,ON NO. / - a 9'7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT 14875 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the C,?nstitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14875 February 21, 2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: ARCHIBALD GARDEN VILLAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4767 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 47 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 6 AND 7, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. {CRFATE SHEET ,4-2: MAP OF TRACT WITH LMD ,4RE.4S HIGHLIGHTED] EXHIBIT "A"-- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.' I CHE/A=CH ~TBEET L/~HT~' ~' EA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 6th Street, west of Archibald. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the fights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract Map 14875 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #1 4 & 1 * 1 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L1 26 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 L 1 36 36 18 ANNEXATION DATE: January 3, 2001 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table sumn~arizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Rate Per # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Family Multi- Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 Family TOTAL $944,691.45 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14876) is: 36 dwelling units x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $1,659.78 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14875) is: 36 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. '- $639.72 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" continued The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14875) is: 36 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $639.72 Annual Assessment TH E C ITY 0 F ]~ANCiiO Sta :Report DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager L'~ FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director BY: Flavio Nunez, Asst. Redevelopment Analyst Lynda L. Thompson, Redevelopment Technician SUBJECT: APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PARKING LOT ON AGENCY-OWNED PROPERTY, APN#208-352-72 RECOMMENDATION Approve lease agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency for the one acre site located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, east of the Civic Center complex, APN#208-352-72, to be used for additional city parking. BACKGROUND The RDA purchased the property from the City in February, 1993 for possible future development of a Fire District Headquarters/Emergency Operations Center. The property has remained vacant. ANALYSIS The parking lot will provide additional parking for City pool vehicles, and overflow employee and visitor parking. The site location, adjacent to City Hall, will provide convenient access for city staff, and alleviate the parking shortage for the customers visiting the Civic Center complex. The lease will be year-to-year, $1.00 per year, and renewable annually. This item also appears on the Redevelopment Agency consent calendar. This action is in addition to Engineering's request for an award of bid and an appropriation of funds for the construction of the project. LEASE This Lease ("Lease") is made and entered into by and between the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "LANDLORD") and THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Califomia municipal corporation and general law City (hereinafter referred to as "TENANT"). 1. Intent; Release; New Obligation. This Lease is intended to regulate all matters by and between LANDLORD and TENANT regarding the Premises. The Effective Date shall be the date the last Party to execute this Lease does show, as shown next to the Party's signature on this Lease. The parties desire to enter into this Lease for and in consideration of and for purposes of establishing a relationship that will serve the needs of the parties. By their execution hereunder the parties mutually, individually and reciprocally, represent and warrant that it is their present intent to create a lease contract. This Lease is subject to the terms, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth and TENANT covenants, as a material part of the consideration for this Lease, to keep and perform each and every term, covenant and condition of said Lease. 2. Premises. LANDLORD hereby agrees to lease to TENANT and TENANT agrees to lease from LANDLORD a portion of that certain real property located in the City ofRancho Cucamonga, Califomia, commonly known as the "Civic Center Expansion Lot" (APN 208-352-72) and hereafter referred to as "the Premises," all as more particularly described in the plat attached hereto as Attachment 1 and by this reference made a part hereof. 3. Term. The term of this Lease shall be for a one (1) year term and shall commence on or upon any date earlier than such date to which LANDLORD consents to in writing, and ending on October 7, 2023. Notwithstanding any provision or interpretation this Lease shall be renewed annually pursuant to the following. The Lease shall not renew if LANDLORD gives written notice to TENANT, not less than five (5) days prior to the lapse of the then effective annual term, that the Lease is not renewed and will terminate on the date which is the end of the current year. 4. Possession of the Premises. Upon execution of this Lease by all parties, TENANT hereby is authorized to continue to utilize that portion of the Premises presently utilized subject to and in accord with the terms of the Minor Development Review currently issued and any amendments thereto for the Premises prior to the commencement of further improvements. The portion of the Premises not presently in use as of the dates the parties execute this Lease may be utilized by Tenant at such time and in accord with the requirements of such Minor Development Review, as amended. 641492 02/06/01 1 5. Rent. Rent shall be in the amount of One Dollar ($1.00) per year, payable on or before thirty (30) calendar days have elapsed from the commencement of the term. 6. Tenant's Use of the Premise. TENANT shall, subject to the existing codes and regulations of TENANT use or permit the use of the Premises for city pool vehicles, and overflow employee and visitor parking lot. TENANT shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the Premises nor bring or keep anything therein which will in any way increase the existing rate of or affect any fire or any other insurance policy maintained by Tenant, Landlord or any third party with a possessory interest in the Site upon the Site, the Premises or any of its contents, or cause cancellation of any insurance policy covering the Site, the Premises or part thereof or portion of its contents. TENANT shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the Premises which will in any way obstruct or interfere with the rights of other parties or injure or annoy them or use or allow or permit the premises to be used for any improper, immoral, unlawful or objectionable purpose. Nor shall TENANT cause, maintain or permit any nuisance in or about the Premises. TENANT shall not commit or suffer to be committed any waste in or upon the Premises. 7. Compliance with Law. A. TENANT's OBLIGATIONS: TENANT shall not use the Premises or permit anything to be done in or about-the Premises, which will in any way conflict with any law, statute, ordinance or private or other governmental rule or regulation now in force or which may hereinafter be enacted or promulgated. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement TENANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly comply with all laws, statutes, ordinances and other governmental rules, regulations or requirements now in force or which may hereinafter be enacted or promulgated that are related to TENANT' s use and occupancy of the Premises. Except as may be expressly provided for herein, TENANT shall be solely responsible for obtaining, at its own sole cost and expense any and all licenses, permits, land use entitlement, environmental clearance and any other authorization required by any entity with legal jurisdiction thereon regarding and pertaining to any use of the Premises by TENANT. The judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction or the admission by TENANT in any action against TENANT, whether LANDLORD be a party thereto or not, that TENANT has violated any law, statute, ordinance or any other governmental rule or regulation shall be conclusive of that fact as between LANDLORD and TENANT. B. LANDLORD's OBLIGATION: LANDLORD has no express obligations under this Lease. 641492 02/06/01 2 Subject to the provisions hereof pertaining to subleasing and assignment, TENANT, and, as necessary, LANDLORD, shall refrain from restricting the rental, sale or lease of the Premises or any portion thereof, on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry of any person. All such deeds, leases or contracts shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: 1. In Deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the premises herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." 2. In Leases or Subleases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him or her, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: "That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee himself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased." 3. In Contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, 641492 02/06/01 3 occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee himself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased." 8. Alterations and Additions. TENANT shall be solely responsible for the design and improvements, including all costs attendant thereto, reasonably necessary to carry out the uses permitted on the Premises, regardless of where such improvements may be located. TENANT shall not make or suffer to be made any alterations, additions or improvements in or to or about the Premises or any part thereof without the written consent of LANDLORD first had and obtained and any alterations, additions, or improvements in, to or about the Premises including, but not limited to, wall coverings, paneling and built-in cabinet work, but excepting movable furniture and trade fixtures, shall on either an enforceable termination of this Lease or upon the expiration of the term hereof become a part of the realty and belong to LANDLORD and shall be surrendered with the Premises. Trade fixtures shall mean articles placed in or attached to buildings by TENANT, to prosecute the trade or business for which the premises are occupied, or to be used in connection with such business, or promote convenience and efficiency in conducting it. In the event LANDLORD consents to the making of any alterations, additions or improvements to the Premises by TENANT, the same shall be made by TENANT at TENANT's sole cost and expense, and any contractor or person selected by TENANT to make the same must first be approved of, in writing, by LANDLORD. Upon the expiration or sooner termination of the term hereof, TENANT shall, upon written demand by LANDLORD given at least twenty (20) days prior to the end of the term, at TENANT's sole cost and expense, forthwith and with all due diligence remove any alterations, additions, or improvements made by TENANT to be removed, and TENANT shall forthwith and with all due diligence at its sole cost and expense, repair any damage to the Premises caused by such removal. 9. Physical Condition of Premises; Waiver. A. By accepting continued possession of the Premises, TENANT shall be deemed to have accepted the Premises as being in good sanitary order, condition and repair. TENANT shall, at TENANT's sole cost and expense, maintain and keep the Premises and any part thereof in good condition and repair. TENANT shall, upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease, surrender the Premises to LANDLORD in good condition. LANDLORD shall have no obligation whatsoever to alter, improve or repair the Premises, or any part thereof and the parties hereto affirm that LANDLORD has made no representations to TENANT respecting the condition of the Premises except as specifically set forth herein. TENANT further agrees that it shall submit to 641492 02/06/01 4 LANDLORD, prior to applying for any permits to renovate, reconstruct, improve, alter or in any way modify the Premises, plans and specifications for LANDLORD's approval. B. LANDLORD shall not be liable for any failure to make any such repairs, or to perform any maintenance except as specifically provided herein in this Agreement. Except as may otherwise be provided herein, there shall be no abatement of rent and no liability of LANDLORD by reason of any injury to or interference with TENANT' s business arising from the making of any repairs, alterations or improvements in or to any portion of the Premises or in or to any fixtures, appurtenances and equipment therein. TENANT hereby specifically waives the right to make repairs at LANDLORD's expense under any law, statute or ordinance now or hereafter in effect. C. TENANT shall accept possession of the Premises, in an "as is" physical condition with no warranty, express or implied, by LANDLORD as to the condition of the Premises, its geology, the presence of known or unknown faults, its suitability for the use intended by the TENANT, any on-site soils or other contamination or any similar matters. It shall be the sole responsibility and obligation of TENANT to investigate and correct any adverse soil, surface of subsurface conditions to the Premises, and to take such action as may be necessary to place the Premises in a condition entirely suitable for the use intended by TENANT and agreed to by LANDLORD as is set forth herein. D. TENANT hereby specifically waives any rights TENANT may have against LANDLORD with regard to the condition of the Premises, including, but not limited to health, soils, toxic or hazardous materials, fill material, compaction, geologic constraints and faults. TENANT also further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LANDLORD from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, demands, actions, judgments, causes of action, assessments, penalties, costs and expenses (including without limitation, the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, expert witnesses and accountants) and all foreseeable and unforeseeable consequential damages which might arise or be asserted against LANDLORD as a result of a claimed violation of any and all present and future federal, state and local laws, (whether under common law, statute, rule, regulation or otherwise), including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. ss 96601 through 9657, inclusive; Transportation of Hazardous Materials and Wastes (HMTA), 49 U.S.C. ss 1801 through 1813, inclusive; the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. ss 6901 through 6992, inclusive; 40 CF.R. Parts 260 through 271, inclusive; the California Hazardous Substance Account Act (HSAA), California Health and Safety Code ss 25300 through 25395, inclusive; the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA), California Health and Safety Code ss 25100 through 25249, inclusive; the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, California Water Code ss 13000 through 13999.16, inclusive; and 641492 02/06/01 5 the Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA), California Health and Safety Code ss 24280 through 24299.7, inclusive, all as the same may be amended from time to time, relating to the environment or to any hazardous substance, activity or material connected with the condition of the Premises. This environmental indemnity shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease as to activities taking place or occurring on or about the Premises prior to such expiration or termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, LANDLORD shall indemnify and hold TENANT harmless from any and all costs, duties and obligations arising from the LANDLORD receiving an order from a body with proper jurisdiction to abate a violation of any applicable law; provided the action, act, or omission comprising the violation occurred without TENANT's involvement, contribution or failure to act. Further, TENANT agrees that, in the event LANDLORD is required to remediate, repair, treat, abandon or in any other manner effect all or a portion of the Premises, that TENANT shall indemnify and hold harmless LANDLORD from any awards, costs, damages or other fiscal loss or payment which arises, directly or indirectly, from the disruption or interruption of TENANT use and occupancy of the Premises. SAID WAIVER IS SPECIFICALLY AGREED TO BY TENANT. Notwithstanding such waiver, TENANT shall have no liability to any third party or to LANDLORD for any environmental law violations which exist on the Premises at the time this lease commences or when TENANT initiates improvements, whichever is the earlier to occur. E. LANDLORD shall, upon request and at TENANTs cost, provide to TENANT copies of all reports, studies, surveys and other data and information concerning the condition of the Premises, which is now available to LANDLORD. LANDLORD represents that it has no information except as set forth hemunder. 10. Claims Against Premises. TENANT shall not suffer or permit to be enforced against the Premises, or any part thereof, any mechanic's materialman's contractor' s or subcontractor's liens arising from, of any claim for any work of construction, repair, restoration, replacement or improvement of or to the Premises or any other claim or demand howsoever the same may arise, but TENANT shall pay or cause to be paid any and all such claims or demands before any action is brought to enforce the same against the Premises. TENANT agrees to indemnify and hold LANDLORD and the Premises free and harmless of all liability for any and all such claims and demands, together with LANDLORD's reasonably attomeys' fees and all costs and expenses in connection therewith. 641492 02/06/01 6 11. Maintenance of Grounds. TENANT agrees to maintain the Premises in a first class condition. Maintenance of said grounds shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of LANDLORD and shall include, but not be limited to, removing graffiti within twenty- four (24) hours, keeping the property free of weeds and debris, maintaining the landscaping and keeping all surfaces in a clean, painted or preserved condition. 12. Utilities. TENANT shall pay the cost of any and all telephone, water, electrical, gas or other utility services delivered to the Premises as utilized and/or occupied by TENANT during the term hereof. TENANT shall have such utilities installed and/or connected and maintained by at TENANT's sole cost and expense. In the event installation of any and all equipment such as submeters, necessary to allow for such direct billing of costs is needed, such expense for said equipment shall borne by the TENANT. 13. Taxes. TENANT shall pay, or cause to be paid, before delinquency, any and all taxes arising from TENANT's occupancy of the Premises. This provision is intended to satisfy the notice requirements of California Revenue and Taxation Code ss 107.6. TENANT agrees that, without prior demand or notice by LANDLORD, TENANT shall, not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the day upon which any such possessory interest or other such tax is due, provide LANDLORD with proof of payment of such tax. 14. Entry by LANDLORD. TENANT hereby agrees that representatives of the LANDLORD, as designated by LANDLORD's Executive Director, shall, upon twenty-four (24) hours prior written or verbal notice an during normal business hours, have the fight to enter the Premises and inspect the same to determine if the same complies with each and every term and condition of this Lease and with all applicable City, County, State and Federal laws, rules, ordinances and regulations relating to building occupancy and the conduct of TENANT's business. TENANT hereby waives any claim for damages or for any injury or inconvenience to or interference with TENANT's business, any loss of occupancy or quiet enjoyment of the Premises, and any loss occasioned thereby. Any entry to the Premises obtained by LANDLORD by any of said reasons, or otherwise, shall not, under any circumstances, be construed or deemed to be a forcible or unlawful entry into, or a detainer of, the Premises, or an eviction of TENANT from the Premises or any portion thereof. 15. Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute a default and breach of this Lease by TENANT: A. Vacating or abandonment of the Premises by TENANT; 641492 02/06/01 7 B. The failure by TENANT to make any payment of rent or any other payment required to be made by TENANT hereunder, as and when due, where such failure shall continue for a period of three (3) days after written notice thereof by LANDLORD to TENANT; C. A failure by TENANT to observe or perform any of the covenants, conditions or provisions of this Lease to be observed or performed by TENANT, where such failure shall continue for a period of twenty (20) days after written notice thereof by LANDLORD to TENANT; provided, however, that if the nature of the default involves such that more than thirty (30) days are reasonably required for its cure, then TENANT shall not be deemed to be in default if TENANT commences such cure within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes said cure to completion; or D. The making by TENANT of any general assignment or general arrangement for the benefit of creditors, or the filing by or against TENANT of a petition to have TENANT adjudged a bankrupt, or a petition or reorganization or arrangement under any law relating to bankruptcy (unless, in the case of a petition filed against TENANT, the same is dismissed within sixty (60) days); or the appointment of a trustee or a receiver to take possession of substantially all of TENANT's assets located in or about the Premises or of TENANT' s interest in this Lease, where possession is not restored to TENANT within thirty (30) days; or the attachment, execution or other judicial seizure of substantially all of TENANT's assets located in or about the premises or of TENANT's interest in this Lease, where such seizure is not discharged in thirty (30) days. 16. Remedies In Default. In the event of any such material default of breach by TENANT, LANDLORD may at any time thereafter and without notice or demand and, without limiting LANDLORD in the exercise of a right or remedy LANDLORD may have by reason of such default or breach; A. Terminate TENANT's right to possession of the Premises by any lawful means, in which case this Lease shall terminate and TENANT shall immediately surrender possession of the Premises to LANDLORD. In such event, LANDLORD shall be entitled to recover from TENANT all damages incurred by LANDLORD by reason of TENANT's default including, but not limited to, the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, expenses of reletting, including necessary renovation and alteration of the Premises, for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, any real estate commission actually paid, or the worth at the time of award by the court having jurisdiction thereof of the amount by which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after the time of such award exceeds the amount of such rental loss for the same period that TENANT proves could be reasonably avoided. Unpaid installments of rent or other sums shall bear interest from due date thereof at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum or at the maximum legal rate 641492 02/06/01 ~ then in effect in California, whichever is higher. In the event TENANT shall have abandoned the Premises, LANDLORD shall have the option of (1) taking possession of the Premises and recovering from TENANT the amount specified in this subparagraph, or (2) proceeding under the provisions of the following subparagraphs. B. Maintain TENANT's right to possession, in which case this Lease shall continue in effect whether or not TENANT shall have abandoned the Premises. In such event, LANDLORD shall be entitled to enfome all of LANDLORD's rights and remedies under this Lease, including the right to recover rent as it becomes due hereunder. C. Pursue any other remedy now or hereafter available to LANDLORD under the laws or judicial decisions of the State of California. Furthermore, TENANT agrees that no election by LANDLORD as to any fights or remedies available hereunder or under or pursuant to any law or judicial decisions of the State of California shall be binding upon LANDLORD until the time of trial of any such action or proceeding. 17. Eminent Domain. If more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Premises shall be taken or appropriated by any public or quasi-public authority (other than the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency) under the power of eminent domain, either party hereto shall have the fight, at its option, to terminate this Lease, and LANDLORD shall be entitled to any and all income, rent, award, or any interest therein whatsoever which may be paid or made in connection with such public or quasi-public use or purpose, and TENANT shall have no claim against LANDLORD for the value of any unexpired term of this Lease. However, TENANT shall be entitled to a monetary compensation for any unused accrued Rent Credits provided that the source of such compensation shall at all times be the condemning agency. In no instance shall LANDLORD be obligated to compensate, from its own funds, TENANT for any portion of unused accrued Rent Credits. If either less than or more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Premises is taken, and neither party elects to terminate as herein provided, the rental thereafter to be paid shall be equitably reduced. 18. Offset Statement. TENANT shall, at any time and from time to time upon not less than ten (10) days prior written notice from LANDLORD, execute, acknowledge and deliver to LANDLORD a statement in writing (a) certifying that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect or, if modified, stating the nature of such modification and certifying that this Lease, as so modified, is in full force and effect and the date to which the rental and other charges are paid in advance, if any, and (b) acknowledging that there are not, to TENANT's knowledge, any nncured defaults on the part of LANDLORD hereunder, or specifying such defaults if any are claimed. Any such 641492 02/06/01 9 statement may be relied upon by any prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of all or any portion of which the Premises are a part. 19. Assignment and Subletting. TENANT shall not assign or transfer this Lease or any right hereunder to any other party or parties nor shall TENANT sublet all or any portion of the Premises without first obtaining the written consent of LANDLORD, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignment or subletting of the Premises without such prior written consent shall be void for all purposes and LANDLORD may, at its option, declares a forfeiture of the same in any manner provided by law. Consent to any such assigmnent or subletting shall be at LANDLORD's sole discretion and LANDLORD is not required hereunder to consent to any such proposed assignment of subletting of the Premises. LANDLORD reserves the right, without limitation, to grant any interest in the Premises to any third party in its sole discretion and without any right of review or approval by TENANT, subject to paragraph 29 of this Agreement. 20. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any term or provision of this Lease, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. 21. Fixtures. All trade fixtures and/or temporary facilities installed in or on the Premises by TENANT may be removed by TENANT at any time during the term of this Lease so long as the same may be removed without permanent damage to the Premises. TENANT shall repair all damage, which may result therefrom to the reasonable satisfaction of LANDLORD. 22. Indemnification. In addition to the indemnity requirement in Paragraph 9 herein, TENANT agrees to defend, with legal counsel of LANDLORD's sole selection, indemnify and hold LANDLORD and its elected officials, officers, agents, consultants, and employees free and harmless from all liabilities, including but not limited to, claims for damage, judgments, awards, settlements to persons or property by reason of TENANT's negligence or TENANT's acts or those of TENANT's employees, agents, guests or invitees in connection with TENANT' s use and occupancy of the Premises. 23. Insurance. A. Fire and Extended Coverage. 1. TENANT's Duty to Keep Improvements Insured. Throughout the term hereof, at TENANT' s sole cost and expense, TENANT shall keep or cause to be kept insured, for the mutual benefit of LANDLORD 641492 02/06/01 l0 and TENANT, all improvements located on or appurtenant to the Premises against loss or damage by fire and such other risks as are now or hereafter included in an extended coverage endorsement in common use for such structures, including vandalism and malicious mischief. The amount of insurance shall be no less than ninety percent (90%) of the then replacement cost, excluding costs of replacing excavations and foundations but without deduction for depreciation (herein called "full insurable value"). LANDLORD shall not carry any insurance the efI~ct of which would be to reduce the protection or payment to TENANT under any insurance that this Lease obligates TENANT to carry. If any dispute as to whether the amount of insurance complies with the above cannot be resolved by agreement, LANDLORD may, not more than once every three (3) months, request the carrier of the insurance then in force to determine the full insurable value as defined in this provision, and the resulting determination shall be conclusive between parties for the purposes of this paragraph. TENANT shall include the holder of any mortgage on the Lease as a loss payee to the extent of that mortgage interest. 2. Proceeds of Fire Extended Coverage Insurance. LANDLORD shall, at TENANT's sole cost and expense, cooperate fully with TENANT to obtain the largest possible recovery, and all policies of fire and extended coverage insurance required by subparagraph 25,A.1, above, shall provide that the proceeds shall be paid to TENANT as follows: a. The proceeds shall be deemed to be held in trust by the recipient to the uses and purposes prescribed by this Lease. b. Disbursements of proceeds for repair, restoration, or reconstruction of improvements shall be made monthly on architect's certificates until all the work is completed and accepted; provided, however, that such disbursements shall not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the work in place until completion, acceptance, expiration of time for lien claims, and elimination of all liens claimed. c. Any insurance proceeds remaining after complying with the provisions of this Lease relating to maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of improvements shall be the sole property of TENANT. B. Public Liability Insurance. Throughout the term hereof, at TENANT' s sole cost and expense, TENANT shall keep or cause to be kept in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of LANDLORD and TENANT, comprehensive broad form general public liability insurance against claims and liability for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from the use, occupancy, disuse, or condition of the Premises, improvements, or adjoining areas or ways, providing protection of at lease One 641492 02/06/01 11 Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one (1) person, Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for any one (1) accident or occurrence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for property damage. C. Policy Form, Contents and Insurer. All insurance required by express provision of this Lease shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of Califomia. All such policies shall contain language to the effect that: (1) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by LANDLORD, and (2) they cannot be canceled or materially altered except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to LANDLORD. TENANT shall furnish LANDLORD with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificates evidencing the insurance. TENANT may effect for its own account any insurance not required under this Lease. D. Failure to Maintain Insurance; Proof of Compliance. TENANT shall deliver to LANDLORD, in the manner required for notices, copies of or endorsements to of all insurance policies required by the Lease, together with evidence satisfactory to LANDLORD of payment required for procurement and maintenance of the policy, within the following time limits: (1) For insurance required at the commencement of this Lease, within ten (10) days after execution of this Lease; (2) For insurance becoming required at a later date, at least ten (10) days before that requirement takes effect, or as soon thereafter as the requirement, if new, takes effect; (3) For any renewal or replacement of a policy already in existence, at least twenty (20) days before expiration or other termination of the existing policy. If TENANT fails or refuses to procure or maintain insurance as required by this Lease, or fails or refuses to fumish LANDLORD with required proof that the insurance has been procured and is in full force and paid for, LANDLORD shall have the right, at LANDLORD's election and on five (5) days' notice, to procure and maintain such insurance. The premiums paid by LANDLORD shall be treated as added rent due from TENANT with interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year or the maximum allowable legal rate in effect in the State of California on the date when the premium is paid, whichever is higher, to be paid on the first day of the month following the date on which the premium was paid. LANDLORD shall give prompt notice of the payment of such premiums, stating the amounts paid and the names of the insurer or insurers, and interest shall run from the day of the notice. 24. Authority of Parties. Each individual executing this Lease on behalf of TENANT represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of TENANT and that this Lease is binding upon TENANT in accordance with its terms. 641492 02/06/01 12 25. Waiver. The waiver by LANDLORD of any term, covenant or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant or condition on any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein contained. The subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein contained. The subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by LANDLORD shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach by TENANT of any term, covenant or condition of this Lease, other than the failure of the TENANT to pay the particular rental so accepted, regardless of LANDLORD's knowledge of such preceding breach at the time of acceptance of such rent. 26. Time. Time is of the essence of this Lease and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. 27. Late Charges. TENANT hereby acknowledges that late payment by TENANT to LANDLORD of rent or other sums due hereunder will cause LANDLORD to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the exact amount of which will be extremely difficult to ascertain. Such costs include, but are not limited to, processing and accounting charges. Accordingly, if any installment of rent or of a sum due from TENANT shall not be received by LANDLORD or LANDLORD' s designee within ten (10) days after written notice that said amount is past due, the TENANT shall pay to LANDLORD a late charge equal to ten percent (10%) of such overdue amount. The parties hereby agree that such late charges represent a fair and reasonable estimate of the cost the LANDLORD will incur by reason of the late payment by TENANT. Acceptance of such late charges by LANDLORD shall in no event constitute a waiver of TENANT's default with respect to such overdue amount, nor prevent LANDLORD from exercising any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder. 28. Inability to Perform. This Lease and the obligations of both LANDLORD and TENANT hereunder shall not be affected or impaired because LANDLORD or TENANT is unable to fulfill any of obligations hereunder or is delayed in doing so, if such inability or delay is caused by reason of strike, war, civil, insurrection, acts of God, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of LANDLORD or TENANT. 29. Signs. TENANT shall not place any sign upon the Premises without LANDLORD's prior written consent and approval thereof. 30. Successors. Subject to the provisions of this Lease with respect to assignment and subletting, each and all of the covenants and conditions of this Lease 641492 02/06/01 13 shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the respective parties. 31. Notices. Any notice required or permitted under the terms of this Lease shall be deemed served when personally served on TENANT or LANDLORD or when the same has been placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: TENANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga A California Municipal Corporation Attention: City Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729-0807 LANDLORD: Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Attention: Executive Director 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 32. Post-acquisition Status/Ineligibility for Relocation Benefits. TENANT acknowledges and agrees that TENANT is post-acquisition tenant of LANDLORD as regards TENANT's participation in this Lease. TENANT represents that TENANT has read the following and understands that as a post-acquisition TENANT, TENANT is not eligible for relocation assistance and benefits from LANDLORD. TENANT agrees and acknowledges that TENANT is not eligible for relocation rights pursuant to ss 6034(b)(1) of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, which reads: "(b)( 1 ) Post-acquisition tenants, those who lawfully occupy property only after a public entity acquires it, or who lawfully occupy property after the private acquisition of property by a person with a written agreement with a public entity for the purpose of financing the purchase or development of the property, are not eligible for assistance and benefits other than advisory assistance to the extent determined by the displacing agency. "A public entity shall inform post-acquisition tenants regarding the pro- jected date of displacement and, periodically, should inform post-acquisition tenants of any changes in this projection. 641492 02/06/01 14 "Persons who become post-acquisition tenants after the effective date of the Guidelines, who are not so informed and who move as the result of a written order from the public entity to vacate are eligible for assistance and benefits, except where they are evicted in accordance with provisions of Section 6058." TENANT acknowledges and agrees that Landlord has adopted either ss 6034(b)( 1 ) or a substantial equivalent thereof and upon such authority TENANT is not eligible for relocation assistance and benefits unless otherwise required by law. Nothing in this Section 37 shall limit TENANT from requesting and receiving moving expenses from any entity that obtains TENANT's interest in the Site pursuant to the exercise of the power of eminent domain. 33. Entire Agreement. This Lease contains the entire agreement between the parties. No promise, representation, warranty, or covenant not included in this Lease has been or is relied on by either party. Each party has relied on his own examination of this Lease, the counsel of his own advisors, and the warranties, representations, and covenants in the Lease itself. The failure or refusal of either party to inspect the Premises or improvements, to read the Lease or other documents or to obtain legal or other advice relevant to this transaction constitutes a waiver of any objection, contention, or claim that might have been based on such reading, inspection, or advice. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into the Lease as of the date set forth below opposite name of each signatory hereto. "TENANT" Dated: Dated: "LANDLORD" Dated: 641492 02/06/01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTACHMENT- 1 Foothill Blvd. \. \ \ \ \ / LEGEND i Parcels ~ Subject property APN: 208-352-72 North 1 OrcicrNo. 2015134 THAT ~RTION OF P~ 2 OF P~ ~ NO. 6725, ~ ~ CI~ OF ~O ~ONGA, ~ OF S~ ~INO, ~A~ OF ~I~IA, ~ SB~ BY ~ ON FI~ IN B~K 67, PAGES 4 ~OUGH 7, IN~US~, OF P~ ~S, IN 'r~ OFFIa OF =~ ~[ ~CO~S OF SAID ~[, DES~IB~ BEGI~ING AT A ~I~ IN ~ MOST SOnY ~R OF SAID P~ NO. 2, SAID ~ ~SO ~ING ON ~ NOR~S~EY RIG~F-WAY LI~ OF C~IC ~NS DRIP, 88 ~ET WIDE ~ SHO~ ON SAID P~aL ~Na NOR~ 32~ 52' 0S" ~ST ~ONG SAID NORWAY RIG~F-WAY LI~ A DZST~ OF 217.73 ~T ~ ~ BEGI~ING OF A T~G~ ~u~ ~N~ SOU~ST ~VING A ~IUS OF 444.00 ~T~ ~Na NOR~S~Y ~NG SAID ~ ~ ~ID RIG~F-~Y LI~ ~OUGH A a~ ~G~ OF 11° 43' 19" ~ ~C DIST~a OF 90.84 ~T ~ ~ ~G~ ~INT, A ~I~ LI~ ~ SAID ~G~ ~INT B~ NOR~ 45° 24'~ 36" ~T$ ~Na NOR~ 45° 24' 36" ~ST ~NG ~ PRO~NGATION OF ~SAZD ~I~ LI~ A DIST~CE OF 34.86 ~ET ~ 'r~ BEGI~ING OF A T~GENT NORT~ST ~VING A ~IUS OF 94.50 ~ET~ ~NCE NOR~S~Y ~ NORT~Y ~NG SAID uuR~ ~OUGH A ~ ~G~ OF 45° 35' 00" ~ ~C DIST~a OF 75.18 ~ET~ ~Na T~GENT ~ SAID ~, NOR~ 00° 10' 24" ~ST A DIST~a OF S8.86 ~ET~ ~NCE ~ONG T~ NORT~Y LI~ OF ~ P~aL DEEDED ~ ~ CI~ OF ~aO ~ONGA ~RIL 30, 1982, PER INSTR~ NO. 82-085~30 OFFICI~ ~CO~S NOR~ 89 49' 36" E~T A DIST~CE OF 489.81 ~ET ~ A ~I~ IN 'r~ SO~~Y LI~ OF SAID P~CEL NO. 2, SAID ~I~ B~ SO~ 426 10' 00" ~ST ~NG SAID SO~~Y LI~ A DIST~a OF 330.14 ~ET ~OM ITS I~ECTION WI~ SOU~S~EY RIGHT-OF-WAY LI~ OF ~R A~, 88.00 ~ET WIDE ~ SHO~ ON SAID P~aL ~ T~NCE SOUTH 42° 10' 00" ~ST ~ONG SAID SOU~S~EY LI~ OF P~CEL NO. 2 A DIST~CE OF 547.79 ~ET ~ ~ POINT OF BEGI~ING. EXCEPT ~FROM, ~TJ. MI~ES, MI~ RIG~S, OIL, OIL RIG~S, NA~ GAS, NA~ GAS RIGHTS, PETRO~, PE~O~ RIG~S, ~R ~R~ON SUBST~aS, GEO~ STY, ~L ~ERGRO~ WATER, ~ ~T.T. PRODU~S DERI~D ~OM ~ OF ~ FO~ING, IN OR ~ER OR ~Ia ~Y ~ PRODU~D ~OM ~ PROPER~ ~Ia ~E~IES A P~ P~L PROPER~ ~ET~R WI~ ~ PE~E~ RIG~ OF DRIVING, MINING, E~LORING OPE~TING ~R ~ S~RING IN ~R ~, INCL~ING ~ RIG~ ~OM ~S O~R ~ ~ PROPER~, OIL, ~R, OR G~ ~S, =u~LS ~ S~TS I~O, ~OUGH OR A~OSS ~ SUBS~A~ OF ~ PROPER~, ~ ~ ~M SU~ ~IPSTO~D OR DI~ION~y DRIED ~S, ~LS, BE~A~ OR BEYO~ ~ EX~RIOR LIMITS ~OF, ~ ~ ~DRI~, ~L, EQUIP, ~I~AIN, ~PAIR, DEEPEN, ~ OPE~ ~ SUa ~S OR MI~S, WZ~O~, HO~R, ~ RIGHT TO DRIP, MINE, STO~, EXPLO~, UPPER FI~ ~D (500') FEET OF ~ S~S~Aa OF 'r~ PROP~, ~ ~SER~D BY DO~ ~O~TION, A DE~W~ CO~O~TION, IN ~ DEED ~ED AUGUST 28, 1981 AS INStaNT NO. 81-190966 OF OFFICI~ ~CO~S~ IN SAID OFFIa OF 'r~ ~CO~ER. THE CITY OF i:~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: February 21,2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Gouncil daek Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AIGP, Senior Planner SUBdEGT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., NOT TO EXGEED $126,000, FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE REGIONAL GENTER, TO BE FUNDED FROM DEVELOPER DEPOSIT THROUGH ACCOUNT NO. 1001314 5303, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Service Agreement awarding the subject contract to LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the January 17, 2001, Council meeting, the Redevelopment Agency entered into a Memorandum of U riderstanding with Forest City Development Co. for the development of the Regional Center at the northwest quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 freeway. The development of the Regional Center requires a focused EIR. City staff selected LSA as the consultant to prepare the EIR for the following reasons: · The firm prepared the EIR for the adjacent 300+ acres Victoria Arbors project and many components of that EIR, such as traffic, biology, and air quality will be used for the Regional Center project · Their track record demonstrates that they are able to meet the aggressive time line for the EIR as desired by Forest City · The firm is on the established list of qualified consultants Staff reviewed their proposal and determined that it meets the City's needs. The total cost of the contract, including a 5 percent contingency, is $126,000. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NRma 12 f~ ORDINANCE NO. ~ ,~ Z AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 17.32 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW CHURCHES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 4) AND TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR CHURCHES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Sacred Heart Church filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as the "application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 00-133, thereby, recommending to this City Council that said application be approved. 3. On the 7th day of February 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on February 7, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced pubic hearing and upon the specific findings of fads set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. FBSPA 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH February 7, 2001 Page 2 a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding pr0pedies; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and furlher, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02, to modify the Development Code Chapter 17.32 Foothill Boulevard Districts to allow churches as a conditionally permitted use in the Regional Commercial land use district (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for churches as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," as well as any related text, tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 E. Utility (FB/U). Quasi-public land uses are typically associated with public activities. Quasi-public land uses typically consist of civic functions such a public administrative offices, museums, libraries, and meeting halls/neighborhood canters. Quasi-public activities are also associated with public utility administrative offices and functions. F. Public IFB/P). Public land uses are typically associated with public transportation facilities and dghts of way. Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations' Uses listed in Table 17.32,030 shall be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Development Code. B, Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to camply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. In addition to the public headng and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. Table t7.32.030 - Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four {ETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Sc CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO I_MR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O Antique Shops P P P P p p p1 p p Apparel a) Bouffi:lues P P P P P P P P P b) General P P P P P P P P ~pp~iance Stores and Repair P P P P P ~ Music, photugraphic Studios P P P P P P P p p p4 C Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32.030 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four ~ETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR VlHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC:RRC MR LI2 O b) Rentals p p p p p p c) Minor Repair (dces not include major engine work, rnt~ler p p p p p shops, painting, body work. upholstery, etc,) d) Coin-op Washing C C C e) Automatic Washing C C C C f) Parts and Supplies P P P P P Ba keries (retail only) P P P P P P P P P P Barber and Beauty Shops P P P P P P P P P P P p4 p Bed and Breakfast C C C C C C C C C Bicycle Shops p p p p p p p p4 Bluepdrd and Photocopy Sewices P P P P P P P P P Book. Gift and Stationery Stores P P P P P P P P P P P P C other than adult related matoffal) Candy and Confectk)nedes p p p p p p p p p p4 Catering Establishments P P P P P P P P P China and Glassware Stores p p p p p p p p4 Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C ~// C. C Establishments Gocktail Lounge(bar, lounge, C ~avem) including reJated C C C C C C C C C ~ C C entertainment Goreinertial Recreational: a) Indoor uses such as bowling p p p p p p p p p p p and billiards ~) Outdoor uses such as tennis C C C C C C C C C and basketball :onvalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P P P P P P P P P P P ~,urtain and DrapeW Shops P P P P P P P ;)ay Cam Csnfers C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Delicatessens and Specialty Food p p p p p p p p p p4 Stores Druq Stores and Pharmades a) over 10,000 square feet p p p p p p b) Pharmades wi~ or without spedalty mtai~ under 10,000 ! C P C P C P P P square feet Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2}. All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subam 7 of Chapter 17.30, Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030. D. Cornrnerdai/Office uses may be located in fie RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project, This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally ndated uses. Regionally Related Commerdal uses am typified by large scale businesses whish serve a market area signi~candy larger than those businesses which draw customers pdmaffiy from ~e neighbomood or community level. 17.32-11 6~99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES O SC CC O MR P SC ]CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR U2 -:lect~onics Sales and Sen/ice p p p p p p FVs, Stereos, radios, computers) -:ducatiof~al Institutions, ~amchial, private (tndnding colleges C and universities) Farmers' Markets P P P P P Floor Covedng Shops P P P P P Rodst Shops P P P P P P P P P P P P P FumRure Sterss P P P P P P P P Hardware Stores P P P P P Health and Athletic Gyms and C P C p C P C p p p4 p ~ Weight Reducing Clinics Hobby Shops P P P P P P p ~4 Ice Cream Stores and Soda P P P P P P P p . p 34 Fountains Janitoriaq Services and Suppfms P P P p p4 C Jewde'/Stores P P P P P P P P .aundry (Self Service) P P P P P .eather Goods and Luggage Stores P P P P P P P P jbfaries ~ Museums, public and C Refer to Subam 4 Section 17.32,080. F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requireme~s pursuant to 17.32,030.D. 17.32-12 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 030 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 Parks and RecreaUon Fadliljes, C ,ublic and I~ivate Pet Shops P P P P P P p p4 photocop,/(Xerox) P P P P P P p p4 Political or Philanthropic C Headqua~tem Public and PIk-ate Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YINCA, C and Similar Youth Group Uses Record and Tape Stores P P P P P P P P P Recreaf~onal Vehicte Storage Yards C Restaurants (sit down): a) with entertainment and/or C C C C C C C C C C C Cocktail lounge, bar b) incidentel serving of beer and wine (without a coddail lounge, p p p p p p p p p P' P P P bar, entertainment Or danring) a) Specialty; nadq~acJdng, Tennis, Refer to Subarea 4 Sec~o~ tT.32.080. F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standaids shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030. D. C~mmerci~//D~le~usesmaybe~catodinthe~RCd~sthc~en~ywiththec~ncun~entdeve~pment~f~nemaj~regi~na~ym~tedanch~rbusin~s~fat~e~st15~(x~squam tet per Site Or project. This rioVision is internted to faSilitsto the development of large, regionally reletsd uses. Regionally Related COmmercial uses am typified by large scale businesses whisi~ serve a market area significantly larger Ihan those businesses Which draw custemes pdrnarily from file neighborhood or community level. 17.32-13 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 030 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea F~ur RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES i SC I CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC I CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC i MR LI2 O Watch and Clod~ Repair Stores P P P P P P P p p p4 Yardage C-eods Stores P P P P P ENTERTAINMENT AND CULTURN. Subarea One Subarea TWO Subarea Three Subarea FOUr USES SC CCI O MR P SC CC O MR MHR!SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O Arcades C C C C C C C C _CutturaVAdlist EXhibits: a) Indoor Caller,/and Art Sales P C p P C P P b) Outdoor AII Exhibits P C P C P C C Discobheques C C C C C C C C Theaters: a) Dinner Theater p P P P P C P b) Movie Theater including p p p p p Subarea One Subam Two Subam Three MU Suba~ea Four PUBLIC USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CCICO JAR MR U CC ~RC MR LI2 O Refer to Subare 4 Sec~on 17.32.080. F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. Camme~cia~ceus~smayba~catedintheRRCdist~ct~n~ywiththec~ncun.entdevebpm~nt~f~nem~rregi~na~ymbtedanch~rbusinessofat~eas~15`~squam feet per site or project This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large. regional ly related uses. Regional ly Related Commercial uses am typified by large 17.32-14 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 Yara uu~la~ng ~arklng Rear Property Line: Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet Adjacent to Existing or Planned 0 feet 5 feet Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line: Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 5 feet 5 feet d. Site Dimensions and Heiqht Limitations· Parkway Land Use Feature RRC CC LI MR Minimum Developable Area 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac Minimum Lot Size 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac Minimum Lot Width 200 200 200 feet feet feet Minimum Lot Depth 175 175 175 feet feet feet Height Limitations: 20 20 20 a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face feet feet feet b) Within 100feetofa Residential 25 25 25 Distdct feet feet feet c) Other Locations 35 35 35 35 feet feet feet feet d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 45 45 45 e) Churches further tha ' from a Residential District, 50 50 50 subject to approval Of a feet feet feet Cor;ditional Use Permit f) Crucifixes or similar adornment 10 10 10 for chUrChes, Subject to feet feet feet apprOval of a Conditional Use (abo~e {above (above P~it ' ~.i~) .re) · u ite Cove °o (includes articulated plazas, hardscape 15% 15% 15% areas, tuff areas, courtyard, and patios Open Space 45% 17.32-91 8/00 O INANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDiNG SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCFIO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A PRiMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON CHURCH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations conceming prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDA1N AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis o fan engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph) 1. Church Street-Millikcn Ave. to Rochester Ave. NP 45 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE Page 2 (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to' be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Ranclao Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk VICINITY MAP Church Street Mi!liken Avenue to Rochester Avenue Figure "A" TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Department Street: CHURCH STREET By: ludvAcosta Date: 12/13/00 From: MillSken Ave. To: Rochester Ave. Area Descrintion Tvne of Street Maior Arterial Distance 4.169 feet (.79 mi~ Vertical AliLmment I ,evel Parldn~ Restrictions Park-in~ nrohibited Street Width 72 feet No. of Lanes & Median 2 lanes each direction with landscaned median island Frnnfin~ Develnt~ment Residential and Cnmmercial with no residential driveway access Averaoe l'~ailv Traf'~e 6,938 vehicles S~eed Check. Date 12/13/00 Averaze St~eed EI~: 45 mnh WB: 45 rrmh 85% Percendle Sneed 48 rnnh 48 rcroh 10 Mile Pace ~1 - 50 mnh 41 - 50 mnh Accident Reeorcls Time Period 1998 & 1999 (2 vean~ Intersection Accidentg Midblock Accidents -0- Accident Rate Exnected 1 .~,ccident Rate Calculated Conditions Not Readilv Annarent None Existin. Sneed Zone Not Posted Pronosed Sneed Zone 45 mnh I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that the above Traffic and Engineering Study was approved and adopted by the City Council. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Date ( :)AD: CHURCH STREET F ~OM: Milliken Ave TO: Rochester Ave RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: t2/13/00 ()CATION: @ RADAR SURVEY SHEET BEGIN: 7:30 END: 9:00 I EATHER/ROAD COND,: clear I dry POSTED SPEED: NP ~ IRECTION: Eastbound [DIRECTION: Westbound NUMBER OF VEHICLES I NUMBER OF VEHICLES PH 5 10 15 20 25 30 H 10 15 20 25 30 3~ 5MP 5iPERCENTILESPEED 43 IOMPHPACE: 41-50 15 PERCENTILE SPEED 43 10MPHPACE: 41-50 I~ I PERCENTILE SPEED 45 # OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 92 50 PERCENTILE SPEED 45 # OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 94 5 i PER, CENTILE SPEED 48 % OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 92 85 PERCENTILE SPEED 48 % OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 94 TH CITY OF F ] I~ANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: Brad Buller, City Planner FROM: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The consideration of amending various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Development Code amendment through the adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The proposed Development Code amendment is a directive from the City Council as a result of previous actions regarding the requirement of tile roofing material. Based on Council's directive, staff has worked with the City Attorney in developing the design guidelines and development standards for roofing materials that are based purely on aesthetic control. On October 25, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed regulations for roofing materials and directed staff to proceed with a code amendment. On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed the formal Development Code Amendment and recommended approval with a unanimous vote. The specific sections of the Development Code that require changes to accommodate the proposed design standards and guidelines are listed in the attached December 13, 2000, Planning Commission staff report. t4t CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 21, 2001 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, with a one-eighth-page advertisement. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF~ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-135 Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment 00-04 Proposed Ordinance for Development Code Amendment 00-04 I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. BACKGROUND: The proposed Development Code amendment is a directive from the City Council as a resultofa recentappeal regarding the requirementoftile roofing material. The design policy which requires roofing material to have a high quality appearance such as tile (fiat concrete or Mission) can be traced back as early as 1980 in the City Council and Planning Commission public hearing minutes. This policy is also reflected in many planning documents adopted since 1987, such as the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based on Council's directive, staff has worked with the City Attorney in developing the design guidelines and development standards for roofing materials. On October 25, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary regulations for roofing materials and directed staff to proceed with a code amendment. ANALYSIS: TheCityAtt~rneyindicatedthattheCityc~u~dad~ptm~restringentbui~dingC~desbasedup~n the safety concerns of fire and wind resistance. However, this approach does not necessarily limit or prohibit the types of roofing materials that meet the minimum fire and wind resistance characteristics, which may include composition shingles. The City may also establish design standards including a list of higher-grade roofing materials, which are aesthetically superior based upon the City's ability to enforce the aesthetic standards required for projects. As a result of the City Attorney's opinion, staff prepared design guidelines and development standards for roofing material based purely on aesthetic control. They are as follows: A. Add the following criteria to Section 17.08.090D2 of the General Design Guidelines: Use roofing material made of tile, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual qua~ty of the structure. COMMENT: The Design Guidelines of the Residential Section of the Development Code are intended to represent the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The design guidelines are specific cdteria that implement the goals and policies stated in the General Plan. The addition ofthe proposed design criteria sets the tone for establishing acceptable roofing matedal based on aesthetic U control in the Site Development Criteria section of the Code. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 00-04 - THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 2 B. Modify Section 17.08.090D4 of the General Design Guidelines as follows: Materials and Colors. Color, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character and enhance the visual quality. COMMENT: Adding the italicized words will furlher the purpose of aesthetic control as mentioned above. C. Add a new subsection in the Site Development Criteria, Section 17.080.040, as follows: Roofin.q Materials. All new development within residential districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the Design Review Committee, if it is determined by the Design Review Committee that the roof material enhances the building design. Roofing materials for additions and accessory structures shall be governed by Section 17.08.0601f, Special Development Criteria. COMMENT: The above development criteria is the aesthetic control on roofing material. It is focused and prescriptive as to the acceptable roofing material. As recommended by the City Attorney, the words "imitation thereof" was added to expand the choices of roofing matedal through the design review process. With advances in technology, manufacturers may invent new products, such as tile- like, or slate-like materials that have the same high quality and grade as real ones. The design review process provides avenue for design solutions and the creative use of materials. D. Add a new subsection in Special Development Criteria, Section 17.08.060, as follows: Roofin.q Materials. All accessory structures, including, but not limited to, second dwelling units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 120 square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses, shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. The pitch of the roof for additions and accessory structures shall be designed to accommodate roof materials made of tile, slate, or an imitation thereof. Where the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition shingles; additions to the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the same material. Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers, cabanas, etc., that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or are not subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition singles, it shaft be of architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached accessory structures not subject to public view is on the applicant, which shall be submitted for City Planner review PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 00-04 - THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 3 and approval. Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses such as barns for keeping of horses or storing of agricultural equipment, may include other roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner. COMMENT: Besides having clear design criteria for roofing material for new development, staff believes that the City should have clear design criteria for additions and re-roofing. The proposed criteria requiring tile roof for additions and allowing re-roofing with asphalt shingles represents the current practice. Staff added criteda specifically to address the detached accessory structures because of the high level of building permits for such structures. Detached structures over 120 square feet in area are subject to the tile roofing material while detached structures less than 120 square feet are not. This is because detached accessory structures that are less than 120 square feet do not require building permits by the Building Code and are not subject to Planning Division review. The added criteria will help clarify and simplify matters for residents. A brief windshield survey of areas within the Equestrian Overlay Distdct shows that there are already existing home barns or structures over horse corrals that have other roof matedal such as metal. Therefore, staff recommends adding criteria for City Planner review of structures for agricultural and equestrian uses on a case-by-case basis. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, with a one-eighth-page advertisement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the adoption of the proposed Ordinance to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF\Is Attachments: Resolution Recommending Approval Mr. Buller c ended the applicant and their architect for an excellent job, a thorough analysis of the site, and a gr odel of the project. He noted that the project will be an asset to the community. Chairman McNiel commented that tt'i licants were a pleasure to work with in design review. Commissioner Tolstoy also complimented the arc ' t for his great exhibit and commended them for their resolve to stay on the property. The Planning Commission recessed from 7:40 p.m. to 7:45 p.m. to accommoda ass exodus of E. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. Brad Buller, City Planner, gave the presentation noting that the amendment is to bring consistency regarding the materials used and to address the issue of aesthetics to be used on new and replacement residential roofs. Henotedthatthequalityofthematedalsusedremainsthesameand will be consistent with the current Building and Fire Code requirements· Commissioner Mannerino asked if an imitation of wood shingle made of an acceptable material would be allowed· He noted that the language used in the list of acceptable materials notes "tile, slate, copper or imitation thereof," and shake is not included there. He wanted to know if a "woodlike" tile that looks like wood shake could be suitable if it is fire retardant. Chairman McNiel noted that there are lightweight tile roofs and other roofs that simulate a shake roof. Mr. Buller replied that simulated material can be acceptable and that it was not meant to prohibit that. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to recommend approval of Development Code Amendment 00-04 as presented and to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40 - ARI~;~"& UTICA PARTNERS, LLC - The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial b ' ' g on 1.72 acres of vacant land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), Ioca he southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491 °79. Sta prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner e the staff report. He noted that the resolution has been revised and directed the missloners to page F-43 of the agenda packet under "J ," Site PI ber 13 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE pERTAINING TO ROOFING MATERIALS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-135 DCA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission heraby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a signfficant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. 00-04 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Y~,.~~ 'f_arry ~y~c~liel, Chairman ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. ~:)~'2,/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO GUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04, AMENDING VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ROOFING MATERIALS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission, after conducting a duly noticed public headng and concluding said hearing on that date, adopted Resolution No. 00-135, recommending approval of said application to the City Council. 3. On the 21 st day of February 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on February 21, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properly located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 21,2001 Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with cedainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment No. 00-04 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 040 P. Zero Lot Line. The dwelling unit may be placed on one interior side property line with a zero setback, and the dwelling unit setback on the other interior side property line shall be a minimum of 10 feet, excluding the connecting elements such as fences, walls, and trellises. Pools, decks, garden features, and other similar elements shall be permitted within the 10 foot setback area, provided, however, no structure, with the exception of fences or walls, shall be placed within easements required below. Where adjacent Zero Lot Line dwellings are not constructed against a common lot line, the builder or developer must provide for a perpetual wall maintenance easement of five feet in width along the adjacent lot and parallel with such wall. Q. Property Maintenance. Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of all buildings, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, recreational facilities, and other improvements in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the surrounding area. In addition, multiple family residential developments subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicable conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Commission. R.Amenities. To enhance the quality of life for multi-family development, additional amenities shall be required as follows: 1. Storaqe Space. Each unit shall be provided with a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space. The storage space shall be located outside of the dwelling at grade or floor level and easily accessible by the residents. The design of the exterior storage space shall be architecturally integrated and/or compatible to the dwellings. The individual storage space units can be located within the fully enclosed garages designated for that dwelling unit. 2. Laundry Facility. Each unit shall be provided with a hook-up for washing machine and clothes dryer in the interior of the dwelling; or common laundry facilities shall be provided and be equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate of one washing machine and clothes dryer per five units. Common laundry facilities should be conveniently located for all residents within the complex. Common laundry facilities can be within freestanding buildings, attached to dwelling units, or within the recreation room. The design of the common laundry facilities shall be architecturally compatible to the dwellings. S. Roofin.q Materials. All new development within residential districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the Design Review Committee, if it is determined by the Design Review Committee that the roof material enhances the building design. Roofing materials for additions and accessory structures shall be governed by Section 17.08.060ff, Special Development Criteria. Section 17.08.050 - Absolute Policies The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most critical issues associated with residential development. These include assuring neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and protection of the environment and public health. Each project must satisfy all absolute policies before approval can be granted. These policies are used in evaluation of a residential project as described in Section 17.06.030 of this Title. !xhibit A '1 17.08-26 7/00 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 060 e. Front yard and corner side yard. No accessory structure or addition shall occupy any portion of a required front yard or corner side yard. B. Patio enclosures. Where required in Tables 17.08.040-B and C, private open space shall maintain a minimum dimension of 12 feet for ground floor units, and 6 feet for upper story units. C. Projections into Yards. 1. Eaves, roof projections, awnings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum distance of 3 feet, provided such appendages are supported only at, or behind, the building setback line. 2. Replacement chimneys, bay windows, balconies, fire escapes, exteriorstairs and landings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum distance of 2 feet, provided such features shall be at least 3 feet from a property line. 3. Decks, platforms, uncovered porches, and landing places which do not exceed a height of 48 inches above grade, may project into any front or corner side yard a maximum distance of 6 feet and project into any rear or intedor side yard up to the property line. D. Projections Above Hei~ht Limits. Flues, chimneys, elevators or other mechanical equipment, television antennas, spires or belltowers, or similar architectural, utility, or mechanical features, may not exceed the height limits in Tables 17.08.040-B and C more than 15 feet, except as provided for in Section 17.08.060-1, Antennas. E. Roofin.q Materials. Aft accessory structures. including. but not limited to, second dwelling units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 120 square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses, shaft have roofing material made of tile, slate. or the imitation thereof, but not including composition singles. The pitch of the roof for additions and accessory structures shall be designed to accommodate roof materials made of tile, slate, or an imitation thereof. Where the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition shingles; additions to the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the same material Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers, cabanas, etc.. that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or are not subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition shingles. it shaft be of architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached accessory structures not subject to pubftc view is on the applicant. which shaft be submitted for City Planner review and approval Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses such as barns for keeping of horses or storing of agricultural equipment, may include other roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner. F. Equestrian Trails. All new residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area designated by the General Plan shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian purposes, to provide access to the rear of all lots. All non-residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian purposes where it is determined by the Exhi bit A - Z, 17.08-33 6~99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 090 e. Spacing for right-of-way widths, street sections, street radii, and intersections are to conform to the Street Design Policy available from the Engineering Division. f. Corner lots are to be wider than interior lots. g. Relate lots and streets to one another to create neighborhoods. h. Relate development to adjacent development relative to street design and lot pattern. i. Avoid long flag lots, key lots, and lots which side on to the rear of other lots. j. If the tract is bordered or surrounded by undeveloped land, prepare a conceptual subdivision plan for those properties to indicate that logical circulation and drainage Can OCCUr. k. Avoid double-frontage lots on interior streets. I. Four-way intersections are generally preferred over offset "T" type on collector or larger streets. m. Avoid bur-way, local-to-local intersections. n. Intersections, including knuckles, are to be perpendicular (radial on curves). o. The maximum length for cul-de-sacs is 600 feet for single-family and 300 feet for multi-family developments. p. LoCal streets are to be a minimum of 150 feet apart, q. Align intersections with existing streets or provide adequate spacing between intersections. r.Only use private streets where through traffic is not necessary and where the private street is gated. s. For private, gated entrances, provide adequate turn-around space in front ofthe gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right- of-way. D. Buildinq Desiqn, 1. Desifin Theme. A recognizable design theme shall be established which is compatible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area (e.g,, trees, landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes Causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant butthat individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. 2. Architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roof line. individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances, Exhibit A "3 17.08-53 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1 Z 08. 090 Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. In particular, Low-Medium and multi-family residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation of surface treatment and architectural details, The architectural concept should also complement the grading and topography of the site. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks well thought out design solutions which reflect the best of a particular style, respect the community's heritage, and relate well to their surroundings. The following guidelines should be considered: a. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). b. If the front of a house is sided. then provide siding to the other sides of the house. c. Consider compatibility with surrounding architectural character, including harmonious building style, form, height, size, color, material, and roof line. d. Develop individual expressions within single buildings in harmony with the neighborhood. Refrain from architectural gimmicks that sacrifice the integrity ofthe streetscape to a single structure. e. Roof lines are critical to the visual impact of a home. Provide roof lines which respond to the general design of other roofs along the street. f Varyj'oof massing andlo~heights~onJargerJ~uildings ........ g. Upgrade design treatment of carport structures to reflect the architectural design of the dwelling units. h. Enhance architectural elements exposed to public view. i. Vary roof designs along rear elevations of units backing up to perimeter streets to provide a pleasant and varied streetscape. j. Coordinate exterior building design on all elevations from building-to-building to achieve the same level of design quality. k. On small lot subdivisions, avoid diverse architectural styles. Keep the design statement, materials, and details consistent. The use of mixed, incompatible architectural styles is strongly discouraged. For example, a Cape Cod style is incompatible with a Spanish style. I. Choose colors consistent with the chosen design theme. Avoid "trendy" colors which become quickly outdated. Low-key and earth-tone colors work best for primary colors; use of more vibrant colors should be limited to accents. m. Provide lockable storage spaces for multiple family units. n. Use 2-car garages with bonus room on some floor plans or offset the third car space to avoid garages which dominate the streetscape. For multi-family projects, garages should be architecturally designed to compliment the residences; consider varying the door treatment on multiple garage structures. E x h i b i t A - ~' 17.08-54 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 090 o. One-story massing is preferred on corner side yards. p. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, trellises, reveals and recesses, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. q. Avoid identical or similar elevation schemes plotted on adjacent lots or across the street from one another. r. Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots. s. Integrate screens for all roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than as an afterthought. t. Design roof line in conjunction with building mass for consistent composition. u. On hillsides, design the form, mass, and profile of buildings and architectural features so as to compliment the natural topography. v. Use native rock for fieldstone. Other forms of stone may be manufactured products. w. Design chimney stacks with accent materials used on the house. such as brick or stone, except on interior chimneys. x. Use roofing material made of tile, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual quality of the structure. 3. Scale. The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site. open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multiple family product type (i.e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent to lower density single family areas. All attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family developments shall be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy. views, and general compatibility. Buildings should emphasize horizontal as well as vertical appearance. This could be achieved by the use of projections or recessions of stories, balconies, windows and doors, and changes in roof levels and planes. In particular for multiple family product type, buildings over three stories should consider stepping back. 4. Materials and Colors. Colors, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character and enhance the visual quality. 5. Siqnin~q. Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement, sign scale in relationship with building, and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing. it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material, and placement. 6. Equipment Screeninq. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building. or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible in terms Exhi b~ t A - 5~ 17.08-55 6/99 THE CITY 0 F l~At~ctIo CUCA~IONCA Merrto ttnl DATE: February 21, 2001 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECt. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - BARRY VANTIGER - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require the construction of storm drainage improvements in Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue for the development of a service station with collvenience market, drive-thl'u fast food servic~ and a drive-thru self-service car wash oa two acres of land located on the Northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwancla Aveflue in the Colliratulity Colnraeraial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - AP~T: 1100-161-002 A letter has been received from the Developer asking this item be postponed until March 7, 2001. WJO:DJ:dlw Attachment FRCIH: Gemreel ~ Hedical Ecttzipment FP, X NQ.: ~ 988 1545 FEb. 14 L:~I~I 01:IL~PH P2 gemreel pharmacy Repumhase Trust 129 N. Euc}-~ Ave. Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-5805 Fax (909) 983-2737 FiB 14 :{'tlUl · "' i~NGtNle. ERtNC- Ol%"lf, i('tN Re: Re~ae~t ofFuaher Continuan~ Appeal to a portion of CUp 99-50 Propo~y ~ at the N/E Comer ofEtiwam ~ Ave. and Footkill Blvd., a.k.a. 12912 Foothill Blv& This letter is to respe~f~!ly request s further continuance ~f the Publig Hearing on the appeal of CUP 99-50 th~ is s~hedulmt for tl~ City Council meelhlg of February 21, 2001. I would Hke this item eonthued to the sc~dul~ City Council Thank you in a~lvauce for your a~snce h ¢hi. matte and should you have any questiota or require anythin8 additional at thi~ time, please feel free to give me a TH CITY OF I~ANCIIO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 2"1,200"1 TO: Mayor and Members of the Gity Gouneil Jack Lain, AIGP, Gity Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the Gity Manager $UI~JI:CT: PROPOSED GHANGFS TO MUNIGIPAL GODE SEGTION 8.2"1 REGARDING SMOKING REGULATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to Chapter 8.21 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding Smoking Regulations. These amendments have been reviewed and approved by the Public Safety Subcommittee and bring our ordinance into conformance with changes in state and federal law that have taken place since "1988. BACKGROUND The current tobacco ordinance for the City was adopted in 1988. In the years since the adoption of this ordinance, much has changed in the growth of Rancho Cucamonga and in the social norms surrounding tobacco use. The current City ordinance (R.C.M.C. 8.21) was a very good ordinance when it was originally adopted. Certain exemptions in the ordinance are now obsolete, being superceded by state law. Removal of this language will guard against misinterpretation of current law. In addition, we have an opportunity to expand the ordinance in areas shown to be of interest to the people of Rancho Cucamonga through opinion surveys conducted by the Behavioral Health Institute at Cal State San Bernardino. Listed below is a summary of changes in state law that have occurred since adoption of our ordinance. Following that summary is a list of proposed changes to our ordinance. Current State Law 1 ) Labor Code Section 6404.5 went into effect on January 1, 1995, with regulations for bars and taverns going into effect on January 1, 1998. Page 2 February 21, 2001 PROPOSED CHANGES TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.21 REGARDING SMOKING REGULATIONS LC6404.5 is a minimum statewide smoking regulation. Stronger provisions may be enacted and enforced at the local level. This prohibits smoking in all enclosed places of employment, with certain exemptions, including: · Small businesses (five or fewer employees - this exemption is not applicable to bars) · Sixty-five percent of hotel and motel guest rooms · Designated portions of hotel and motel lobbies (up to 50% of lobbies that are 2,000 square feet or less; up to 25% of larger lobbies) · Meeting and banquet rooms when no employee is stationed there · Warehouses with more than 100,00 square feet of floor space and 20 or fewer employees · Employee breakrooms designated by employers for smoking, provided four specific conditions are met. 2) Penal Code 308(a) prohibits the sale or furnishing of tobacco to minors and PC 308 (b) prohibits the possession of tobacco by minors. This includes tobacco, cigarettes, or cigarette papers, or any preparation of tobacco, or any other instrument or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco, products prepared from tobacco, or designed for and controlled substance. 3) Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act (STAKE Act), Business and Professions Code Section 22952, prohibits the sale or furnishing of tobacco to any person under the age of 18 and requires retail sellers to check the ID of anyone buying tobacco who appears to be under 18 years old. Additionally, businesses must post a state warning sign. The STAKE Act also prohibits vending machines except in businesses holding an on-sale public premises liquor license, and prohibits tobacco billboards within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds. 4) The November 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the Attorneys General and the tobacco industry establishes a number of restrictions on youth marketing, billboards, sponsorship, etc.; however the MSA does NOT cover the following: · Storefront advertising signs that are less than 14 square feet; · Self-service displays of tobacco products (a self-service display is an open display of tobacco products, such as on a rack or countertop, that does not require clerk assistance to reach the product); · Sponsorship in the corporate name of a tobacco company; · The sale of cigarettes from vending machines. Changes to City Ordinance The San Bernardino County Department of Public Health Tobacco Use Reduction Now program has helped prepare a model ordinance specifically for the City. Page 3 February21, 2001 PROPOSED CHANGES TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.21 REGARDING SMOKING REGULATIONS Obsolete language has been deleted from the 1988 ordinance provisions. In addition, the ordinance has been strengthened in the following areas: 1. Hotel and Motel lobbies 2. Business Entrances 3. Vendor-Assisted Sales/Self-Service Displays Following are the proposed new sections along with an analysis of their impact. 1. Hotel and Motel Lobbies. The changes to this section make it clear that smoking is prohibited in all indoor lobby areas. There are currently three yellow pages listings under Hotels & Motels in Rancho Cucamonga, the Best Western Inn on Spruce, Motel 66 on Foothill, and the New Kansan Motel on Foothill. Of these, only the Best Western heritage Inn has an indoor lobby and is already adamant about maintaining a 100% smoke-free lobby. Because of this fact, it is not anticipated that this will create an additional burden to businesses or for enforcement. 2. Business Entrances. This proposed change would prohibit smoking within 20 feet of the entrance to City buildings and would allow retail, non-profit or service related businesses to prohibit smoking in the same manner by posting a sign. A number of cities have adopted ordinances specifying a smoke-free buffer zone (Ex. 25 feet) near business entrances, with much support from non-smokers. Roughly 82% of Californians are non-smokers. Tobacco Use Reduction Now regularly receives complaints from people who dislike walking through smoke at business entrances. Enforcement for LC 6404.5, California's Smoke-Free Workplace Law, is currently handled by Rancho Cucamonga Code Enforcement. Announcements of the new law through newspapers and direct mail to business owners, with signs to be posted near entrances, can make great strides towards achieving voluntary compliance. By making enforcement of this provision complaint-driven, as is LC 6404.5, with initial complaints being followed by letters and/or telephone contact to urge compliance, it is anticipated that enforcement efforts will peak in the first months following adoption of the ordinance, diminishing rapidly as public self-enforcement takes over. This effect has been observed with many previous laws limiting smoking in public areas. 3. Vendor-Assisted Sales/Self-Service Displays. This new section would remove self-serve displays of tobacco products. This will help reduce minor's access to tobacco products. Survey data from the Behavioral Health Institute was presented at a City Council Meeting on October 20, 1999. This data Page 4 February 21, 2001 PROPOSED CHANGES TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.2'1 REGARDING SMOKING REGULATIONS showed 92.2% of the community members surveyed supported the adoption of a local ordinance to limit cigarette placement, requiring clerk assistance for tobacco access. Chain convenience stores, such as 7-11 and AM PM adopted behind-the- counter cigarette displays a few years ago to encourage clerk compliance with the STAKE Act and PC 308. Many gas stations, grocery stores, drug stores, and liquor stores also adopted this practice at this time. Yellow page listings show 11 gas stations, 6 grocery stores, 6 drug stores, 8 liquor stores, and 7 convenience stores in Rancho Cucamonga. For the majority of these sites, the adoption of this ordinance will simply require that they remove any on-the-counter displays. VVhen the City of Redlands adopted an ordinance limiting tobacco to vendor-assisted sales in March, 1996, they used youth groups to provide merchant education. This significantly increased voluntary compliance with the law from the start. Continued enforcement has not added , significantly to the duties of local code enforcement. Tobacco Use Reduction Now is available to provide technical assistance to local code enforcement to assist in the development of protocol, signage, and educational materials for voluntary compliance. In addition, TURN is able to provide youth training for merchant education regarding vendor-assisted sales. Attached for your review is the amended ordinance. Also attached is a copy of the surveys conducted in Rancho Cucamonga by the Behavioral Health Institute. This information and the amended ordinance was reviewed and approved by the Public Safety Subcommittee. It is recommended that the full City Council adopt this amended ordinance. Respectfully submitted, 'Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager attachments CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE STUDIES SAN BERNARDINO Behavioral Health Institute 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardlno, CA 92407-2397 (909) 880-5567 August 31, 1999 Claudia Maidenberg, D.A.T.E.(Drug, Alcohol, Tobacco) Educator 8776 Archibald Ave Raneho Cueamonga, Ca 91730 Dear Mrs. Maidenberg, Enclosed is a copy of results from several surveys conducted for the City of Rancho Cueamonga regarding youth access to tobacco. The studies were completed as one component of our partnership with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as well as 20 other cities in the Inland Empire, to determine variables that impact the accessibility of tobacco by youth in their community. Additional data collection, end interventions will occur throughout June 2000 as well as in the C~ity of Rancho Cucamonga as data is collected and presented to the city council, additional information will be forwarded to you as well. If you have any questions or know of others who would also be interested in our efforts please call Gwenn Norton-Perry at (909) 880-5567. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Klonoff, Ph.D. Gwerm Norton-Perry Executive Director Public Policy Project Coordinator Co. Michele Jacknik, San Bemardino Department of Health Services Rod Hoops, Police Captain- Raneho Cucamonga Police Department Ms. Carlene Henriques, Tri-County South Regional Tobacco-Free Project The California State University Bakersfield · Channel Islands · Chico · Dornlnguez Hills · Fresno · Fullert~n · Hayward · Humboldt. Long Beach · Los Ar~eles · Maritimt Academy Behavioral Health Institute P.A.C.T. Project Report City of Rancho Cucamonga When our University-Rancho Cucamonga PACT was established on March 10, 1998, we agreed to provide the City Council with various data on tobacco specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The purpose of this report is to provide data obtained from two sources, a survey of Rancho Cucamonga residents and a survey conducted with Rancho Cucamonga teen-agers who smoke cigarettes. Community Attitudes Survey One of our goals was to be able to provide city council members with better information regarding how their constituents felt about various tobacco-related issues and potential legislative solutions. To collect these data, we have been conducting large-scale community surveys throughout San Bemardino and Riverside Counties. We report on the results we have obtained to date for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Our surveys were conducted by research assistants employed by the Behavioral Health Institute. After obtaining permission from store owners, three teams of two research assistants were assigned to six supermarkets in the Rancho Cucamonga area. This team visited the store for approximately 90 minutes during the day on the week-end. The team stood outside the store and approached each person entering andasked if he/she would be willing to participate in a survey about.health in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. A copy of the questions asked can be found in Appendix A. A total of 377 people were approached in this manner; 223 (or 59.2%) refused to participate. As aresult, the data presented here re~ectthe opinions ofthe154 Rancho Cucamonga residents who consented to participate in the survey. Of the 154 individuals, 71 (46.1%) were men and 83 (53.9%) were women. The sample ranged in age from 18 to 73 with an average age of 37.49 years and a median age of 37. Approximately 60.4% of the group surveyed were White, 14.9% were Latino, 14.9% were African American, about 5~8% were Asian, and 3.9% either refused to answer or described themselves as some other ethnic group. Of the 154 people, 48 (31.2%) reported that they themselves were smokers. General Knowled~e of Tobacco First, participants were asked some basic information questions about smoking. In general, their responses revealed that they were somewhat familiar with these data. For example, when asked how old people typically were when they started smoking, answers ranged from age 9 to 23. with most people identifying that smoking typically starts at around age 12 to 16 (the average age reported was 15.05). One-hundred and thirty-one (85.1%) participants knew that one had to be 18 in order to legally purchase cigarettes in the State of California; 21 (11.7%) thought one had to be 21 to legally purchase cigarettes, while 1 (0.6%) said 19, 1 (0.6%) said 24. and 3 (1.9%) said they did not know. Sales of ci,qarettes to children A number of questions asked of community members were designed to identify where exactly participants thought children obtained cigarettes. These results are presented in Table 1 and also shown in Figure 1. Table 1. Where participants say children get their cigarettes How do children obtain cigarettes? Said 'Yes" Said "No" Number Percent Number Percent Buy themselves from stores or vending machines 43 27.9 111 72.1 Steal cigarettes from stores 15 9.7 139 90.3 Get cigarettes from parents 38 24.7 116 75.3 Have adults buy cigarettes for them 54 35.1 100 64,9 Have friends buy cigarettes for them 36 23.4 118 76.6 Get them some other way 3 1.9 151 98.1 As can be seen, the highest proportion of participants thought that children either had adults buy cigarettes for them or purchased cigarettes themselves at stores or vending machines. Nonetheless 101 (or 65.6%) of those surveyed thought that it should be illegal to sell cigarettes to children, while another 37 (24%) thought that stores should be heavily punished for doing so. Twenty-seven participants (17.5%) reported that they had seen clerks sell cigarettes illegally to children; of these 27, 11 people reported that they tried to do something to stop the sale. Of those who did not do anything to stop or prevent the illegal sale, the most common reasons were that it was not any of their business or that they preferred not to say. On-the other hand, 82 (53.2%) of those who responded reported that they had seen a clerk refuse to sell cigarettes to a child. Other Tobacco-Related Issues A total of 120 (77.9%) participants reported that they believed tobacco companies definitely make a special effort to make advertising appealing to children, while another 16 (10.4%) said tobacco companies sometimes tried to appeal to children. When asked if tobacco should be advertised on billboards, 47 (30.5%) of those surveyed said "yes"; 106 (or 68.8%) said that tobacco should not be advertised on billboards, while 1 (0.6%) said they had no opinion. Consistent with this view, 112 (or 72.7%) ofthe participants said theywould support an ordinance in their city to ban tobacco advertising on billboards. However, most importantly, 142 (92.2%) of those that responded said they would support an ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga banning stores from putting cigarettes out where children can pick them up without asking. (See figure 2) Survey of Child Smokers In addition to surveying community members, we also conducted surveys with children who sm'~k.e We first contacted the DATE coordinators for Chaffey Unified School District, obtained permission to do the survey, and found out the location of the local spot where students "hang out" and smoke cigarettes. We then chose times either before school, during lunch breaks, or after school, and a member of the Behavioral Health Institute staff. accompanied by a research assistant, went to these local "hang out" sites. We approached teen-agers who were there and asked if we could ask them some questions about their smoking. A copy of the survey used for this portion is presented in Appendix B. A total of 30 teens participated. Of the 30 participants, 14 (46.7%) were girls and 16 (53.3%) were boys. Twenty-six (86.7%) were VVhite, 3 (10%) were Latino, and I (3.3%) was African American. Their age ranged from 14 to 18 (average age was 16.05). All 30 teen-agers smoked. The age they reported they began smoking ranged from 8 to 16 (average age was 13.1). These 30 children each smoked an average of 10.16 cigarettes per day (range was .75 cigarette to 1% packs of cigarettes per day). They tended to smoke the brands that are advertised most frequently; 25 (83.3%) said they smoked Marlboros, 10 (33.3%) said they smoked Camels, 2 (6.7%) said they smoked Winstons, 2 (6.7%) Virginia Slims, and 3 (10%) smoked another brand. (These may not total 100% because children may have indicated they smoked more than 1 brand). A number of questions were asked about the factors that may have prompted these children to start smoking (note: these do not total to 100% because children could have s. aid "yes" to more than one factor). Peers or friends were important to 16 (53.3%) children; members of their family smoking was acknowledged as important by 12 (or 40%); 2 (6.7%) said they smoked because it looked mature; no child said ihey smoked because they like to take risks, because of family problems or to help them relax; 2 (6.7%) said they started smoking because they were cudous about it; and 2 (6.7%) gave other reasons for starting to smoke. A number of questions were designed to help us identify exactly where children get their cigarettes.. These results are presented in Table 2. Table 2. Where teen-aged smokers say they get their cigarettes How do you get your cigarettes? Said "Yes" Said "No" Number Percent Number Percen Buy themselves from stores or vending machines 15 50 15 50 Get ("bum") cigarettes from their friends 15 53.3 14 46.7 Get cigarettes from their parents 4 13.3 26 86.7 Get free samples of cigarettes 3 10 27 90 Steal cigarettes 2 6.7 28 93.3 Ask a stranger to buy cigarettes for them 2 6.7 28 93.3 Ask a friend to buy cigarettes for them 3 10 27 90 Some other way ' 4 13.3 26 86.7 The adults in the community survey said the two most likely methods of children obtaining cigarettes were that they had adults buy cigarettes for them or they bought cigarettes ;'. themselves. However the adults surveyed underestimated the degree to which these children obtain cigarettes from their "friends." Over half of the children reported "bumming" cigarettes from friends. Exactly who these "friends" are and how they obtain their cigarettes remains a mystery. Finally, we asked the children a number of questions about their perceptions and experience regardin9 the ease with which cigarettes could be obtained. When asked how easy it was to buy cigarettes (Figure 4), 11 (36.7%) said it was "very easy," 6 (20%) said it was "faidy easy," 2 (6.7%) said it was "faidy difficult," 3 (10%) said it was "very difficult," and no child said it was "impossible" (8 had never tded to buy cigarettes). When asked how often they were aski~d for their age or for identification (Figure 5), 5 (16.7%) said "always," 5 (16.7%) said "usually," 6 (20%) said "sometimes," 4 (13.3%) said "rarely," and 2 (6.7%) said "never' (8 students, or 26.7%, who don't buy their own could not answer this question). We next asked how often they were sold to after they had been asked for their age or for identification (Figure 6); 3 (10%) said "always," 2 (6.7%) said "usually," 1 (3.3%) said "sometimes," 3 (10%) said "rarely," and 13 (43.3%) said "never" (with the same 8 students who do not buy their own unable to answer); thus, consistent with published reports, clerks are less likely to sell cigarettes when they ask for age or identification. However, because buying cigarettes themselves is only one way children obtain them, efforts still need to be directed towards helping children understand that "friends" don't give "friends" cigarettes. Summary and Conclusions Taken together, these results suggest a number of areas for future development of tobacco-related issues in Rancho Cucamonga. First, although adults seem to know some basic information about tobacco, they appear to have little idea of the degree to which Rancho Cucamonga children illegally obtain cigarettes for themselves, regardless of how. Because the children in this study perceive that asking their age or for identification decreases their likelihood of being able to purchase cigarettes, increasing merchant compliance with this legislated requirement could serve to be a real deterrent to children being able to get cigarettes; however, this must be coupled with a community education program that makes adults aware of the harm they are doing when they comply with requests from children to purchase cigarettes for them. Second, adult residents support banning tobacco billboards, so Rancho Cucamonga can feel comfortable actively ensuring that the voluntary removal of tobacco related advertising called for in the tobacco settlement is completed. Finally, adults overwhelmingly support the passage of a city ordinance that would make it illegal to display cigarettes where children can reach them easily; a number of models for ~he way in which to do this are already available. Many researchers feel that, when the clerk is required to look directly at a child (who would then be required to ask the clerk directly for a pack of cigarettes), the clerk is more likely to ask the child his/her age or for identification. Thus, passage of this ordinance may also facilitate decreased illegal sales of tobacco products to children. Elizabeth A. Klonoff, Ph.D., Executive Director, Behavioral Health Institute, California State University, San Bemardino Gwenn Norton-Perry, Project Coordinator, P.A.C.T. Project, Behavioral Health Institute, California State University, San Bernardino Roxanna Alcaraz, M .A. Administrative Director and Project Coordinator, P.A.C.T. Project, Behavioral Health Institute, California State University, San Bemardino Carol Ross-Lewis, Project Associate, P.A.C.T. Project, Behavioral Health Institute, Califomia State University, San Bernardino Rebecca Paynton, M.S., Project Associate, P.A.C.T. Project, Behavioral Health Institute, California State University, San Bernardino Figure 1. Where children get cigarettes: Community perceptions 40 35 %30 o20 '~15 0 I,,, ~10 5 0 Steal from stores Adults buy for them Get another way Buy themselves Get from parents Friends buy for them Figure 2. Community Attitudes Regarding Various Tobacco Policy Issues . 100 .~ 80 6o 0 1::). 40 ,41,1 0 20 I,, 0 Tobacco should not be adverbfeed on billboards Ordinance limiting cigarette placement Companies direct advertising to children Ordinance to ban tobacco billboards Figure 3. Where Rancho Cucamonga teens get their cigarettes 60 0 ; ~,40 ~'30 "Bum" from friendsFree samplesAsk a mngerto buySome o~erway Buy ~emselvesFrom the~' parentsSteal dgarettesAsk a friend to buy Figure 4~ How easy is it for teens to buy cigarettes? 40 35 +-, 15 o~ 10 Q, 5 0 r~ Fairly easy Very difficult Very easy Fairly difficult Impossible Figure 5. How often are teens or identification? 20 15 0 -- Usually Rarely Always Sometimes Never Figure 6. How often sold to after asked age or for ID? 50 40 0 ~ Usually Rarely Always Sometimes Never \tl.0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 8.21 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OR PROHIBITION OF SMOKING AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 8.21.010 (Purpose and findings) of Chapter 8.21(Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City Council finds that the smoking and use of tobacco, or any other weed or plant, is a medically documented danger to health and a material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort and health hazard to those who are present in confined spaces, and in order to preserve public health, safety and welfare, the declared purpose of this chapter is to regulate the smoking of tobacco, or any weed or plant, within the city and public places." Section 2. Section 8.21.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "For purposes of this chapter, unless it is plainly evident from the context that a different meaning is intended, the following definitions shall apply: A. "City facility" shall mean any enclosed structure owned, leased or operated by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and used by the city for governmental operations and activities. B. "Restaurant" shall mean any dinner house, coffee shop, cafeteria, luncheonette, soda fountain, fast food service, and any other establishment where cooked or otherwise prepared food is sold to the general public, and where seating for consumption is available on the premises." C. "Smoke" or "smoking" shall mean the carrying or holding of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment. "Smoke" also means the gaseous products and particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment." 11231.0001/623184.1 Section 3. Section 8.21.040 (Smoking prohibited--Hospitals, health care and child care facilities) of Chapter 8.21(Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in public areas of health care facilities and hospitals, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 1250, including patient rooms, waiting rooms, public hallways and lobbies. B. Signs reading "STAFF AND VISITOR SMOKING PROHIBITED" shall be conspicuously posted in public areas of health care facilities and hospitals. C. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in public areas ofchildcare facilities." Section 4. Section 8.21.050 (Smoking prohibited--Meeting and conference rooms) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Except as hereinafter provided, smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in enclosed hearing rooms, conference rooms, chambers, and all other enclosed places of public assembly." Section 5. Section 8.21.090 (Smoking prohibited--Eating establishments) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "8.21.090 Smoking prohibited-restaurants and bars. Smoking is prohibited and unlawful in the enclosed portions of every restaurant and bar, whether publicly or privately owned, including, but not limited to, lobbies, waiting areas, restrooms, and dining areas of the restaurants and bars." Section 6. Section 8.21.110 (Smoking prohibited--Indoor office and lobby areas) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in all indoor lobbies, reception and/or office areas open to the public." Section 7. Section 8.21.120 (Smoking prohibited--Retail food marketing establishments) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in an retail food marketing establishments including grocery stores and supermarkets." 11231.0001/623184.1 Section 8. Section 8.21.130 (Smoking prohibited--Retail stores) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in all indoor retail stores in all areas." Section 9. Section 8.21.140 (Smoking prohibited--Banks and other financial institutions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful within banks and other financial institutions in all areas." Section 10. Section 8.21.150 (Smoking prohibited--Public buildings and structures) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful within all public buildings and structures in all areas." Section 11. Section 8.21.155 (Smoking prohibited--Entrances) is hereby added to Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: 8.21.155 Smoking prohibitedBEntrances. "A. Smoking shall be prohibited within an area measured twenty feet from the entrance of any City facility. B. Any retail, non-profit, or service related business owner may choose to prohibit smoking within twenty feet of the entrance of said business by conspicuously posting a no smoking sign at or near the entrance to the business. Said sign shall reference this ordinance and contain language similar to the following: "No smoking within twenty feet of the entrance, pursuant to RCMC Section 8.21.155." When posted in accordance with this provision, smoking within twenty feet of the entrance shall be prohibited. C. It shall be the responsibility of any person smoking outside to ensure that smoke does not enter any buildings through open windows or doors." Section 12. Findings and intent regarding Section 13 of this Ordinance pertaining to vendor assisted sales. "A. The City has a substantial interest in promoting compliance with State policy and law prohibiting the sales of tobacco products to minors. The purpose of Section 13 of this ordinance is to regulate the business of selling tobacco products in order to 11231.0001/623184.1 decrease the likelihood of illegal purchases of such products by minors. The City Council finds that local authority to enact regulations such as those set forth in Section 13 of this ordinance is supported by the case of Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage, 16 Cal.App.4th 383(1993). B. The City Council recognizes that Penal Code Section 308 preempts the field of penal aspects of the sale of cigarettes to minors. Section 13 of this Ordinance is not intended, and shall not be construed as, intruding into such preempted field." Section 13. Section 8.21.165 (Vendor Assisted Sales) is hereby added to Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) to read as follows: "8.21.165. Vendor Assisted Sales. A. For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Retail tobacco store" shall mean a retail store utilized primarily for the sale of tobacco products and accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental. For putposes of this subsection, the term "primarily" shall mean that at least eighty percent (80%) of the square footage of the available retail floor and shelf space is devoted to the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products and accessories. 2. "Self-service display" shall mean the display of tobacco products in such manner that the products are accessible by the public without the intervention of the vendor. B. Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be unlawful in any business establishment to sell, dispense, permit to be sold or offer for sale any tobacco product by means other than vendor-assisted sales. This prohibition shall specifically preclude the selling, offering for sale, dispensing and displaying of tobacco products by self-service displays. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this prohibition shall not apply to retail tobacco stores and cigar lounges. C. No person shall sell, permit to be sold, or offer for sale any tobacco product to a buyer who reasonably appears to be less than 27 years of age unless such buyer has first presented photographic identification establishing that the buyer is not less than 18 years of age." D. Self-service displays in place as of the effective date of this ordinance in a location prohibited in paragraph B above shall be removed not later than September 1, 2001. Section 14. Section 8.21.180 (Exemptions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) is hereby repealed. 11231.0001/623184.1 Section 15. Sections 8.21.190 (Penalties) and 8.21.200 (Civil remedies available) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) are hereby renumbered Section 8.21.180 and Section 8.21.190 respectively. Section 16. A new paragraph "D" is hereby added to Section 8.21.180 (Penalties) of Chapter 8.21(Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "D. A violation of any provision of this Chapter is an infraction which is punishable as provided in Section 1.12.030 of this Code." Section 17. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2001. AYES: NOES: EXCUSED: ABSTAIN: Mayor Ci~ Clerk 11231.0001/623184.1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 8.21 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OR PROHIBITION OF SMOKING AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 8.21.010 (Purpose and findings) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City Council finds that the smoking and use of tobacco, or any other weed or plant, is a medically documented danger to health and a material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort and health hazard to those who are present in confined spaces, and in order to preserve public health, safety and welfare, the declared purpose of this chapter is to regulate the smoking of tobacco, or any weed or plant, within the city and public places." Section 2. Section 8.21.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "For purposes of this chapter, unless it is plainly evident from the context that a different meaning is intended, the following definitions shall apply: A. "City facility" shall mean any enclosed structure owned, leased or operated by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and used by the city for governmental operations and activities. B. "Restaurant" shall mean any dinner house, coffee shop, cafeteria, lnncheonette, soda fountain, fast food service, and any other establishment where cooked or otherwise prepared food is sold to the general public, and where seating for consumption is available on the premises." C. "Smoke" or "smoking" shall mean the carrying or holding of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment. "Smoke" also means the gaseous products and particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment." 11231.0001/623184.1 Section 3. Section 8.21.040 (Smoking prohibited--Hospitals, health care and child care facilities) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in public areas of health care facilities and hospitals, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 1250, including patient rooms, waiting rooms, public hallways and lobbies. B. Signs reading "STAFF AND VISITOR SMOKING PROHIBITED" shall be conspicuously posted in public areas of health care facilities and hospitals. C. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in public areas of childcare facilities." Section 4. Section 8.21.050 (Smoking prohibited--Meeting and conference rooms) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Except as hereinafter provided, smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in enclosed hearing rooms, conference rooms, chambers, and all other enclosed places of public assembly." Section 5. Section 8.21.090 (Smoking prohibited--Eating establishments) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "8.21.090 Smoking prohibited-restaurants. Smoking is prohibited and unlawful in the enclosed portions of every restaurant, whether publicly or privately owned, including, but not limited to, lobbies, waiting areas, restrooms, and dining areas of the restaurants." Section6. Section S.21.110 (Smoking prohibited--Indoor office and lobby areas) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in all indoor lobbies, reception and/or office areas open to the public." Section 7. Section 8.21.120 (Smoking prohibited--Retail food marketing establishments) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in an retail food marketing establishments including grocery stores and supermarkets." Section 8. Section 8.21.130 (Smoking prohibited--Retail stores) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in all indoor retail stores in all areas." Section 9. Section 8.21.140 (Smoking prohibited--Banks and other financial institutions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful within banks and other financial institutions in all areas." Section 10. Section 8.21.150 (Smoking prohibited--Public buildings and structures) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful within all public buildings and structures in all areas." Section 11. Section 8.21.155 (Smoking prohibited--Entrances) is hereby added to Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: 8.21.155 Smoking prohibited--Entrances. "A. Smoking shall be prohibited within an area measured twenty feet from the entrance of any City facility. B. Any retail, non-profit, or service related business owner may choose to prohibit smoking within twenty feet of the entrance of said business by conspicuously posting a no smoking sign at or near the entrance to the business. Said sign shall reference this ordinance and contain language similar to the following: "No smoking within twenty feet of the entrance, pursuant to RCMC Section 8.21.155." When posted in accordance with this provision, smoking within twenty feet of the entrance shall be prohibited. C. It shall be the responsibility of any person smoking outside to ensure that smoke does not enter any buildings through open windows or doors." Section 12. Findings and intent regarding Section 13 of this Ordinance pertaining to vendor assisted sales. "A. The City has a substantial interest in promoting compliance with State policy and law prohibiting the sales of tobacco products to minors. The purpose of Section 13 of this ordinance is to regulate the business of selling tobacco products in order to decrease the likelihood of illegal purchases of such products by minors. The City Council finds that local authority to enact regulations such as those set forth in Section 13 of this ordinance is supported by the case of Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage, 16 Cal. App.4th 383(1993). B. The City Council recognizes that Penal Code Section 308 preempts the field of penal aspects of the sale of cigarettes to minors. Section 13 of this Ordinance is not intended, and shall not be construed as, intruding into such preempted field." Section 13. Section 8.21.165 (Vendor Assisted Sales) is hereby added to Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) to read as follows: "8.21.165. Vendor Assisted Sales. A. For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: I. "Retail tobacco store" shall mean a retail store utilized primarily for the sale of tobacco products and accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental. For purposes of this subsection, the term "primarily" shall mean that at least eighty percent (80%) of the square footage of the available retail floor and shelf space is devoted to the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products and accessories. 2. "Self-service display" shall mean the display of tobacco products in such manner that the products are accessible by the public without the intervention of the vendor. B. Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be unlawful in any business establishment to sell, dispense, permit to be sold or offer for sale any tobacco product by means other than vendor-assisted sales. This prohibition shall specifically preclude the selling, offering for sale, dispensing and displaying of tobacco products by self-service displays. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this prohibition shall not apply to retail tobacco stores and cigar lounges. C. No person shall sell, permit to be sold, or offer for sale any tobacco product to a buyer who reasonably appears to be less than 27 years of age unless such buyer has first presented photographic identification establishing that the buyer is not less than 18 years of age." D. Self-service displays in place as of the effective date of this ordinance in a location prohibited in paragraph B above shall be removed not later than September 1, 2001. Section 14. Section 8.21.180 (Exemptions) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) is hereby repealed. 11231.0001/623184.1 Section 15. Sections 8.21.190 (Penalties) and 8.21.200 (Civil remedies available) of Chapter 8.21 (Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) are hereby tenumbered Section 8.21.180 and Section 8.21.190 respectively. Section 16. A new paragraph "D" is hereby added to Section 8.21.180 (Penalties) of Chapter 8.21(Smoking Regulated or Prohibited) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "D. A violation of any provision of this Chapter is an infraction which is punishable as provided in Section I. 12.030 of this Code." Section 17. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of 2001. AYES: NOES: EXCUSED: ABSTAIN: Mayor City Clerk 11231.0001/623184.1 RANCHO C UCA MONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO MODIFY ETIWANDA DRAINAGE FEE - PACIFIC COMMUNITIES REQUEST City Council consider a request from Pacific Communities to modi~ the drainage fee in the Etiwanda Drainage area south of Base Line Road. BACKGROUND The Etiwanda area has not been able to develop economically in the way the rest of the City has experienced during the last 5 years. The reason for this is the significant amount of drainage infrastructure that must be constructed in order to provide drainage protection to properties. Another critical factor is the status of the San Sevaine/Etiwanda Creeks. These creeks are currently unimproved and pass through neighboring communities to the south. Because of this, it is imperative the City not increase drainage runoff in these channels until such time as they are fully improved and operational. The inability to allow increased runoff severely handicaps the development process in this area. In response to this dilemma, the City developed the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Drainage Plan. The Plan spells out the infrastructure to be constructed and allows for detention basins to be built which would mitigate the problem of increased runoff. As part of the master plan, a fee was established in 1989 which was intended to reimburse developers who step in to bear the cost of the major infrastructure. The fee is $8,900 per acre and has not been indexed for inflation in the 12 years since it was established. In addition, in order to construct the major regional improvements on the Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage facility, the County has imposed a regional fee of $7,800. There have been several attempts in the past to form a Community Facilities District or Assessment District in the area. As recently as 1996 the City initiated such an effort. However, due to the large assessment which would have to be paid upon formation of the district, the property owners in the area have not been supportive of this effort. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REQUEST TO MODIFY ETIWANDA DRAINAGE FEE February 21, 2001 Page 2 There are many small property owners who are not ready to develop and hence the large assessment that would be placed immediately on their property would have been an economic burden to them. Therefore, the City Council has not approved any requested assessment district in this area to date. U.S. Homes, a large properly owner in the area, attempted to either construct the infrastructure or to form a CFD/Assessment District in 1991. Due to the low sale price of the homes at that time, they were unable economically to move forward with this effort. The City has recently received a request from Pacific Communities, Incorporated, to revise the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Drainage Plan by increasing the $8,900 fee. ANALYSIS Pacific Communities is developing Tract No. 15711. The developer has created a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund the construction of the master plan drainage facilities needed to protect this site. While these facilities are intended to protect the developers' site it will also benefit other developers in the Etiwanda Drainage area. A reimbursement is provided through the City's existing drainage fee. As noted above, this fee was established over 12 years ago. Pacific Communities has requested the fee be adjusted to provide adequate compensation for these improvements. Pacific Communities points out that without this infrastructure development in the Etiwanda area, development cannot move forward due to the lack of drainage facilities and the fee has not been indexed to provide for infiationary increases in construction costs. Pacific Communities did a drainage study, which staff has reviewed. The study indicates a fee of approximately $22,700 per acre is needed to provide adequate reimbursement to Pacific Communities and all other developers who will provide Master Plan Facilities. Staff has verified this number for accuracy. In addition, Pacific Communities has constructed a detention basin which allows development in the Etiwanda Area to move forward. Until the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Flood Control Improvements are completed, all developers south of Base Line will be required to pay a fair share of the basin construction. The cost of this fee is being calculated by Pacific Communities and will be a direct reimbursement to Pacific Communities. It is important to point out the City's responsibility in regard to reimbursements. The Subdivision Map Act requires the developer constructing oversized facilities be reimbursed for this effort. Under the Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinance it is the City's responsibility to insure there is a mechanism in place to provide for this reimbursement. Two solutions are available. First, the drainage fee could be adjusted. Secondly, the City could require all new development to enter into developer-to- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REQUEST TO MODIFY ETIWANDA DRAINAGE FEE February 21, 2001 Page 3 developer reimbursement agreements. While reimbursement agreements are acceptable, this is a cumbersome method and requires a great complexity of calculation, since each project must be taken on an individual basis. In addition, there is generally a dispute between the developers who then request the City to act as arbitrator in the process. Either process ultimately results in the same cost to the developer. It is for this reason that the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Drainage Plan established a fee program to pay for these reimbursements. This process is easier to understand since each developer knows up front what the obligations are at the beginning of the development process. Lastly, several developers in this area have requested City participation in the drainage effort through construction of a storm drain on Foothill Boulevard between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue as a public works project. Because the majority of parcels on Foothill are small, only a few acres at most, it is cost prohibitive to construct this storm drain which will cost approximately $750,000. Staff has reviewed this request and notes City participation could provide significant public benefits. First, the storm drain will allow small parcels to be developed more logically. In addition, significant public improvements will be constructed by a developer such as curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lights and other amenities. These improvements will not only provide aesthetic appeal but they will also provide significant safety improvements on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. These improvements would be paid for by the development community. Under these circumstances, staff believes this is a fair request and would recommend the storm drain construction project be included in next years Capital Improvement Program with the understanding new development in the area will not have to comply with the requirement to build the facility. In addition, if Council approves the increase in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fee, sufficient revenue will be generated to reimburse the City for the cost of this facility. If Council concurs with the request, staff will prepare a resolution adjusting the fee, modify the Master Drainage Plan and set a public hearing for consideration. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:dlw la~NI;M~d~Y I:~I~A4NAf-,,E ~tl"f LIMIT AREA. / CITY OF ~ . RANCHO CUCAMONGA TII~ ~,~ ~&~o~ ,~_ ~o,,,~,~, ENGIN~,~{ING DIVISION RANC h O C UCAMONGA ] COMMUNITY SERVICES DAT~: February 21, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 3ack kam, A~CP, City Manager FROM: Keyin McArd~e, Comm~ ices D~ec~o~ Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SU~E~: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Seaices Update BACKGROUND In accordan~ with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this repo~ is provided to highlight pe~inent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Se~i~s Depa~ment and the Park Design/Development and Maintenan~ Sealions of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE La Mission Park: · The park site is under construction. S~ ~mplex: · Completed tuff renovation on softbali fields 2, 3 and 4, which included aeri~tion, fe~ilizing, sodding, seeding and topdressing of fields. Heritage Park: Soccer fields were aerified, seeded and top-dressed in preparation for the fields being turned over to baseball. Red Hill Park: · The senior league baseball field was detached, aerated and top-dressed with sand. CITY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Special Street Tree Project: · Boy Scouts volunteered their time to plant 14 Crape Myrtle trees on Hermosa, south of Foothill, on Saturday, February 17th. Volunteers from Sunrise Rotary Club supervised the youngsters. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: · A Valentine's Party was held on February 8th at the Senior Center. This fun filled event celebrated cupid and his special celebration of love. Paul Cavin performed classic love ballads. Refreshments were provided and 120 senior attended. This event was co-sponsored by the VIP Club. · A Valentine's Lunch and Dance was held at the Senior Center on Saturday, February 10th. Our Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) prepared and served a spaghetti meal and provided big band music. This great intergenerational program was attended by 60 seniors. · Mardi Gras - February 27th. Come spend Fat Tuesday at the Senior Center to celebrate our own version of Mardi Gras. You'll think you are in the middle of New Orleans as we celebrate with entertainment from the King himself, Elvis along with tasty Cajon refreshments. · A St. Patrick's Day celebration will be held at the Senior Center on March 16th. This special day for the wearin' of the green will include old favorite Irish songs and dances performed by the Gypsy Ensemble, as well as delicious refreshments. · Plans are currently underway for the Senior Center's participation in the 12th Annual Golden Follies Talent Showcase to be held on March 31't at 2:00 p.m. at the Montclair Senior Center. This senior talent showcase features individuals and groups representing the cities of Chino, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga and Upland performing song, dance, instrumental and novelty acts. Our Senior Center line dance class will represent our City at the event. Tickets are now on sale at the Senior Center for $2.00 each. · A delightful 4-week seminar on How to Add 30 Years to Your Life will be offered free beginning in March at the Senior Center. Noted behavioralist and humorist, Dr. Bill Abersold will conduct these valuable workshops. · The next meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee will be held on Monday, February 26th at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. The Committee has been assisting in the development of an advocacy plan for securing funding for a new senior center. Activities have included hosting a luncheon meeting with Assemblywoman McCIoud, securing over 100 letters from seniors supporting the project and obtaining over 500 support pledge signatures. The Park and Recreation Commission appointed 4 new members in January to the Committee. Membership is now at full strength of 20. -2- CiTY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 · The Senior Center's Line Dance class is so popular that an additional weekly class will be added to our offerings beginning in March. · A new weekly Cross Stitch and Needle Point class will be introduced at the Senior Center in late February. In addition, a Knitting and Crocheting class is available each Friday at the Center. Human Services: · The Alzheimer's Association will be presenting a free lecture on The Warning Signs of Alzheimer~ Disease and What You Should Knowon February 23rd at 10:00 a.m. at the Center. · The Arthritis Foundation is sponsoring a free 7-week lecture on Fibromyalgia. The lecture series will take place between February 20-April 3, 2001, from 9:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. · The County of San Bernardino, Department of Public Health will present a free 6-week workshop on Living a Healthy Life and Managing Your Health beginning March 2"d through April 6th. The lectures will take place at the Senior Center from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. · AARP tax volunteers will be available to prepare tax forms for seniors and low income residents of Rancho Cucamonga starting February 2nd and concluding on April 13th. This service is available Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Appointments are required. Due to the heavy demand for this program an additional day each week has been added this year. · EIder Law Matters is a free monthly seminar for seniors presented by Gregory A. Wood, Attorney at Law on the 4t" Friday of each month at the Senior Center. His next lecture will be held on February 23rd at 12-noon. The topic of his presentation will be Avoiding Capital Gains on the Sale of Your Home Under the New Tax Laws. Mr. Wood also provides one free individual counseling session each month. Trips and Tours: · Palm Springs Aerial Tram - March 10th - Enjoy spectacular 360-degree views of the Coachella Valley and Mt. San Jacinto from the new tram cars, the largest rotating tram cars in the world. Participants on the trip will also stop at the Desert Hills Premium Outlets in Cabazon for shopping (Seats are still available.). · Carlsbad Flower Field - April 14th - Nestled high on a hillside overlooking the Pacific Ocean, the flower fields at Carlsbad Ranch bloom annually into a 50-acre rainbow of bright ranunculus flowers. Participants will be able to stroll leisurely through the fields, shop or mine for gemstones. This trip has something for everyone. (Seats are still available.) · Bell Gardens and Bates Nut Farm - May 5th - Join us as we tour a 115-acre farm and enjoy a hayride. A box lunch is included with the trip. We'll then go to the Bates Nut Farm for shopping. (Seats are still available.) -3- CITY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Volunteers: · Staff is researching the development of a college intern program to be introduced into the Community Services Department. · The Citywide Volunteer Recognition Proqram will be held on April 29th. Community Services Department staff is involved in arranging numerous details of the event. · The table below summarizes our Departmental usage of volunteers for the month of December and for the year. MONTH: December 2000 YEAR TO DATE Volunteers # of Hours $ Value* Volunteers # of Hours $ Value* Admin 5 10 $ 140 67 209 $ 2,926 Sports 231 1,416 $19,824 1,561 10,350 $144,900 Senior 45 238 $ 3,332 572 2,415 $ 33,810 Human Services Special 62 242 $ 3,388 325 1,533 $ 21,462 Events Youth 34 90 $ 1,260 354 2,615 $ 36,610 Programs 377 1,996 $27,944 2,879 17, 122 $239,708 *DOllar value based on $14.00 per hour. Teens: · A teen Valentine's Dance took place at Lions West Community Center. The event offered low cost photos, give-a-way items and lots of fun. Over hundred and fifty teens are expected to attend this February 16th event. Youth Activities: · The new Mobile Recreation program, recently dubbed Fun on the Run is gearing up for a spring start. Staff is in the process of being hired, supplies are being ordered and the finishing touches are being added to the vehicle. The program will be featured on the cover of the spring issue of The Grapevine, along with the unveiling of the program's logo. -4- CITY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Grants: · A contract with the Superintendent of Schools Office has been approved by City Council for $30,000 for funding for a new Teen Connection Program. This program will place staff on high school campuses once per week to offer community services volunteer opportunities and other activities. · Staff is working with the local skate shops and junior high schools to bring on-campus demonstrations and educational materials regarding skating safety to the teens as part of the Kids Plate Grant. · Recruitment for the coordinator to oversee the Youth Enrichment Services grant program was completed in late January. Hiring is also taking place for the additional classroom aides and the Playschool teachers are planning the implementation of their safety curriculums. Other aspects of the program, including the Resource Center and Library services are getting closer to implementation. Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Pee Wee Basketball 288 3-5/Boys & Girls 24 6-1 ,Bo s,G,r,s 422 key 198 6-15/Boys &Girls 23 Non Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit organized youth sport leagues throughout the City. The table that follows indicates participation figures for February/March 2001. Facility use indicated only notes City facilities. A number of groups also used school sites. AYSO 160 17,544 26,316 gl % Bear Gulch Park Beryl East Park Beryl West Park Church Street Park Etiwanda Creek Park ACE Youth 47 6,024 g,036 87% Red Hill Park Softbali* Golden Oak Park Spruce Park Alta Loma 30 4,332 6,498 100% Heritage Park Little League Hermosa Park CYSA 32 5,088 7,632 70% Red Hill Park Citrus Little 26 3,684 5,526 g5% Red Hill Park League -5- CITY COUNCIL iViEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Deer'Canyon 25 3,636 5,454 100% Heritage Park Little League Coyote Canyon Park Victoria Groves Park Rancho Liffie 30 4,080 6,120 98% Milliken Park League Old Town Park Mountain View Park Epi~nter Spots Complex RC Pony 3 456 684 100% Old Town Pa~ Baseball Heritage Park RC Spidts 3 420 630 77% Red Hill Park Windrows Pa~ RC ~ball 22 3,216 4,824 835 Red Hill Park Vineyard 41 6,024 9,036 97% Ellena Park Liffie League Windrows Park Vintage Park Kenyon Park Epicenter SpoKs ~mplex RC Family Spots Center: · Activities at the Spots Center for the reposing period are summarized in the table below: Basketball Full 120 Adu3ffMales 10 Teams CouP-Leagues Three-on-Three 40 AdultMales 8 Teams Basketball Leagues Racquetball 12 AdulffMales 12 Individuals Singles League · The table below provides drop-in/open play pa~icipation at the RC Family Spots Center for the reposing period: Adult Basketball 1,099 Youth Basketball 1,523 Adult Racquetball 537 Youth Ra~uetball 90 Adult Volleyball 84 Youth Volleyball 97 Ja~ercise 894 Adult Spots: · The table on the following page summarizes adult spots activities for the reposing period: -6- CITY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Adult Softball 2,144 Adu It/Male 134 teams Adult Flag Football 224 Adult/Male 14 teams Adult Tennis 38 Adult/Male & Female 38 Single/Doubles Adult Soccer 700 ,Adult Male &Female, 5 leagues/48 teams Park Facilities: · Park reservation information for the month of January 2000 is listed in the table below: Red Hill 175 5 Resident 6 27 1 Non-Resident Heritage 50 1 Resident 1 5 0 Non-Resident Hermosa 25 1 Resident 1 5 0 Non-Resident Coyote Canyon 60 2 Resident 2 9 0 Non-Resident Civic Courtyard 0 0 Resident 0 0 0 Non-Resident Amphitheater 60 1 Resident 1 5 0 Non-Resident Total 370 10 Resident 11 1 Non-Resident Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usage for the months of January/February are outlined in the table below: 4-H January 15th General Meeting / 7-9 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club January 16th General Meeting / 7-9 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club January 21"t Horse Show / 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club February 7th Board Meeting / 7-10 p.m. 4-H February 26th General Meeting / 7-9 p.m. Community Wide Special Events: · Although the Department did not sponsored any community wide special events during the last month staff has begun the process of planning for spring/summer programs including Kids Fest, Movies in the Park, Concerts in the Part, Cinco de Mayo and the 4 of July Fireworks. -7- CITY COUNCIL MEETING PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21,2001 Performing Arts: · Classes and workshops including, Vocal Expression, Television Commercial Workshop and the Multi-Media Art continue to be offered at Lions West Community Center. Each 5-week session provide our residents with opportunities to expand their talents and enrich their lives. Park and Recreation Commission: · The following items were discussed at the Commission's January 18, 2001 meetinq: -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. -Discussion regarding art at the off-leash dog park located at Etiwanda Creek Park. -Consideration of appointments to the Senior Advisory Committee. -Election of Officers - Chair and Vice-Chair. -Review of events and activities at the Spruce Park Skate Facility. -Discussion regarding development of a BMX facility. -Consideration of Commissioner's attendance at the 2001 California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference to be held March 14-17, 2001. -General Plan update. -Community Foundation. -Trails, Sports and Senior Advisory Committees. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed at the Foundation's January 9, 2001 meetinq: -Grant programs. -Possible funding sources. -Review of City Council recognition of the Founder's Gala 2000 sponsors and ambassadors. -Discussion regarding the Community Foundation's 2001 Gala to be held November 3, 2001. -Consideration of scheduling Community Foundation workshop regarding the Board's future goals. Community Services Director City Engineer htCOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncillStaffReportslupdate2.21.01.doc -8-