HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-330 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 84-330
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION (ANNEXATION) OF
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF
BANYAN AVENUE AND THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL FREEWAY ON THE
NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST AND WEST.
WHEREAS, the above-described property is located within the
established Sphere of Influence of the City, and is contiguous to current City
limits; and
WHEREAS, the annexation of the property will represent a logical
extension of the City's boundaries and urban services~ and
WHEREAS, it is the City's intention to provide the usual and
necessary urban services to the area upon annexation, as outlined in the Plan
of Services; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has approved Tentative Tract
Map No. 12642 in respect to a portion of the above-described Property and the
Final Development Plan and a Preliminary Development Plan for the balance of
the property; and
WHEREAS, the City, prior to the issuance of the County Development
Approvals, reviewed the proposed development as depicted in the County
Development Approvals, and participated in the procedures initiated within the
County culminating in the issuance of the County Development Approvals; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the annexation of the property
to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that
the Property, developed in a manner authorized by the County Development
Approvals, would be consistent with the City's General Plan,
WHEREAS, the City Council as governing body of the City of Rancho
Cueamonga desires to initiate proceedings for a Change of Organization
Annexation, in accordance with Government Code Section 56195 for the above
described property.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council as the governing body of the City of
Raneho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:
SECTION 1: Application and a proposal is hereby made to the Local
Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino for Change of
Organization/Annexation to the City of Raneho Cucamonga of the herein
described property as outlined in the Justification form, which is Exhibit "A"
to this resolution, and is by this reference incorporated herein as though
fully set forth.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file
a certified copy of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local
Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardinc.
Resolution No. 8~-330
Page 2
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 1984.
AYES: Wright, Buquet, Mikels, Dahl, King
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Authelet, City Clerk
Resolution No. 84-330
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "A"
JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSAL AND PRELIMINARY
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION FORM
For LAFC0 Use 0nly
TO;
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
825 East Third Street, Room 201
San Bernardino, CA 924)5
INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data
about the proposed project and project site to allow the Commission and staff
to adequately assess the project. By taking the time to fully respond to the
questions below, you can reduce the processing time for your project. You
may also include any additionai information which you believe is pertinent.
Use additional sheets where necessary.
I, NAME OF PROPOSAL:
Of Rancho Cucamonqa
2.
3.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Chanqe of orqanization/annexation to the City
APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga
GENEP~AL LOCATION: North of Highland Avenue, between extensions of
Ililliken to the west and Rochester to the east.
4. Does the application possess 100~ written consent of each property owner
in the subject territory? YES X NO (If YES,'attach written
authorizations.) (Written consent ~ill e~'~'~'Fovided separately)
5. Indicate the reasons that the proposed action has been requested.
Annexation and development thereof per Development Plans would be
beneficial to the public purposes of the City and consistent with
the Citv's General Plan and beneficial to the public health, safety
and general welfare.
6. Would the proposal create a totally or substantially surrounded island of
unincorporated territory? YES __NO X If YES, please justify
proposed boundary.
LAFC 3
Ray. 2/80
Resolution No. 84-330
Page 4
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
I. Total land area: ~240 acres
2. Dwelling units in area: 0
3. Approximate population in area: 0
4. Indicate the General Plan designation of the affected city:
Low Residential (2-4 du/ac)
San 8ernardino County General Plan designation: RES - 4, except
NEC of rlilliken and Highland is designated Commercial
S. Describe any special land use concerns expressed in the above plans.
Refer to Development Plan text, pages 10-13, for discussion
of relationship of proposed development to concerns/goals
of West Valley Foothills Community Plan.
6. Indicate the existing land use. Vacant
o
What is the proposed land use? Single family residential Planned
Unit Development consisting of 902 dwellings and 16.29 acres of
open space/parks
Indicate the existing county zoning title and denslt~es permitted.
RS-72 - 4 DU per gross acre plus density bonuses permitted by West
Valley Foothills Community Plan.
Has the area been pre-zoned? YES NO X * N/A If YES, what is
the pre-zoning classification, title, and ~ensities Pe"~7~mitted.
· Prezoning in progress for zoning designation of "Caryn Planned
Community". Regulations adopted by S.B. County under their PUD
83-0044 will in effect become the zoning & Development controls
under the City's "Caryn Planned Community" disignation.
Resolution No. 84-330
Page 5
Estimate any other future governmental services that will be required
For additional development of this site.
Refer to Plan for Municipal Services (attached)
I0.
Will the proposal require public services from any agency or district
which is currently operating at or near capacity (including sewer, water,
police, fire, or schools)? YES X NO If YES, please explain.
Schools are operating at or near capacity and developers are
working with District to provide school facilities as discussed
on paqe 27 of Development Plan text.
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
State general description of topography. Alluvial wash, gently
sloping at approximately 4 1/2% grade. Refer to Exhibit 3 of
Development Plan .text for contour map.
Describe any existing improvements in the site as ~ of total area.
Residential 0 ~ Agricultural 0
Ccxnmercial 0 ~ Vacant 100
Industrial 0 ~ Other 0
Describe the adjacent land uses. Primarily undeveloped, four single
family residences to the east and southeast
Describe site alterations that will be Produced by improvement projects
associated with this proposed action. (grading, flow channelization, etc.)
Refer to County approved Development Plan text for discussion of
physical improvements to site.
ResoT, ution ~'o. L"14-S~2~
['age 6
5. Will service extensions accomplished by this proposal induce growth on
this site? YES X NO Adjacent sites? YES X NO
Unincorporated "'X"' IncOrporated
6. Is this project a part of a larger project or series of projects?
YES __ NO X If YES, please explain.
NOTICES
Please provide the names and addresses of persons who are to be furnished
copies of the agenda and staff report and who are to be given mailed
notice of hearing.
Name
Address
Name
Address
Name
Address
Joe Di Iorio c/o the Caryn Company
10340 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Otto Kroutil c/o City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division
P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonqa, CA 91730
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented herein are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date:
Phone: {714} 989-1851
Signature of Applicant
9340 Baseline, Suite B
Address
Ranch0 Cucamonga, CA 91730
To be enclosed with this form:
5 copies of this Exhibit "A"
30 copies of the map
30 copies of the legal description
2 copies of the Voter Location List
TO BE EXTENDED AND THEIR TIMING
SERVICES
CURRENT PROVIDER
COST TO TAX-
PAYER/RESIDENT
(estimated)
Community Development
Planning San Bernardino County a) 240 acres
Code Enforcement San Bernardino County a) 240 acres
Redevelopment None Provided
FOR: TIHING: COST TO CITY
(a) Total area Ca) immediately (estimated)
(b) Partial area~ (b) future - list
approximate
.,,,;.~ .~_!,lS~_,_ .
a) March 1985 $ 3812.78 $. .06
a) Harch 1985 243.37 $ .003
None P]anned O
0
Leisure Services
Parks None Provided b) 1986
Recreation None Provided
b) 1986
Library San Bernardino County ~No Change
Museum San Bernardino County ])l~-[.~l~r~. No Change
Public Safety
Police S.B. County Sheriff a) 240 acres ~o Change
Fire Fnnthi]] Firp ~i~trir~ a) 240 acres No Change
Rescue Foothill Fire District a) 240 acres No Change
Paramedic Foothi]] Fire District a) 240 acres NA
Ambulance Private Vendors a) 240 acres No Change
Animal Control San Bernardino County a) 240 acres No Change
$ ~0',~50'.00 $. .63
incl. above incl. above
O O
0 0
$ 139,802.00 $ 2.14
$ _~ ...... $ 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
*Please list approximate acreage to be served.
SERVICES
Public Works
Streets:
Construction
blaintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Parking
Utilities
Sewage
Collection
Treatment
Disposal
Reclamation
Water
Acquisition
Storage
Distribution
Cable TV
Electricity
Solid Waste
Collection
Disposal
Transit
OTHER:
Ple~ tach
CURRENT PROVIDER
FOR:
(a) Total area
(b) Partial area
None Provided
None Provided
None Provided
None Provided
San Bernardino County
{tone Provided
240 acres
TIHING: COST TO CITY COST TO FAX-
(a) immediately (estimated) PAYER/RESIDENT
(b) future - list (estimated)
approximate
month ~ year
b) Dec. 1985 0 0
b) March 1986 $ 37,338.00 $. .58
b) March 1986 inc]. above incl. above
b) March 1986 0 0
No Change 0 0
None Planned 0 0
Cucamonqa County Water Dis.a. a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Chino Basin f~D a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Chino Basin MWD a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Chino Basin fMD a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Cuc. Co. Water District a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Cuc. Co. Water District a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Cuc. Co. Water District a) 240 acres b) Dec. 1986 0 0
Private Vendors a) 240 acres b) Harch 1986 0 0
SCE a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Private Vendors a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0
Private Vendors a) 240 acres b) r~arch 1986 0 0
Omnitrans a) 240 acres b) March 1986 0 0