Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-74 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 79-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOINIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS- MENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Ordinance No. 86 entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, establishing a Growth Management Plan to Regulate New Residential Development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga", which requires that a Residential Assessment System for development review be established, setting forth five (5) basic categories, each category being assigned a maximum number of total points which shall be used for rating purposes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City has recommended adoption of a Growth Management Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City ~ou~cil has considered the purposes of the Growth Management Plan as set forth in paragraph B of Section 1 of said Ordinance and the criteria required to be considered in paragraph A, Section 6 of said Ordinance including, but not limited to, Public Services, Design Quality, Affordable Housing, Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments, and Orderly Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a Residential Assessment System is established based upon the following criteria for Total Development: SECTION 1: PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities The Growth Management Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff. A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 pts. maximum). 1. Project drains into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated (8 points). 2. Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which is also capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points). 3. Project provides special drainage facilities (e.g., on- site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (1 point). (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Drainage Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project). B. Street Circulation and Improvements The Growth Management Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project. A project must receive a minimum of 5 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). Rcsolotion No. 79-74 Page No. 2 1. Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (5 points). 2. Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points). 3. Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points). ~. Project will build or widen a collector street or is located adjacent to a fully improved collector street (4 points). 5. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by City standards (2 points). (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s master planned developments, etc., Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total sbatl be applied to each phase of that project). C. Residential Safety and Security The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department and the Foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project incorporates safety and security techniques. A project must receive a minimum of 3 points in each of the following categories in order to receive further consideration (8 points maximum). Police Protection (4 points maximum) a. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Commission or Community Development Director on over 70% of its perimeter (2 points). b. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Commission or Community Development Director between 25% and 70% of its perimeter (1 point). c. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points). d. Security devices such as window locks wi|l be installed in each unit (1 point). e. Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting placement, etc., to enhance residential security (1 point). (NOTES: 1. For project submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Police Protection shall be evaluated for ~he entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project). 2. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements of l(a) and l(b). Rcsolu[ion No. 79-7~ Page 3 3. If the applicant opts for Points c., d., and e., these will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map.) 2. Fire Protection (4 points maximum) a. 70% - 80% of the project is within a three minute driving response time of a fire station. (4 points). b. 70% - 80% of project is between a three and five minute driving response time of a fire station (2 points). c. 70 - 80% of project is between a five and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (1 point). d. Fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistent building materials, sLte design which enhances fire access, etc.) are incorporated into the design of the project (2 points). (NOTE: If the applicant opts for point 2(d)., it will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map). D. Parks and Paths The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and/or private parks and usable open space. A project must receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum). 1. Project provides on or off site public park improvements and/or school recreational facilities (1 point). 2. Project provides privateiv owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point). 3. Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and/or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (1 point). 4. Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point). 5. Over 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of an existing public park site (4 points). 6. Over 50% of project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park site (1 point). 7. Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of an existing public park site (2 points). 8. Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of a future proposed public park site (1/2 point). 9. More than 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of usable public open space other than public parks. (e.g., school facilities, national forest, etc.) (2 points). (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., provision of parks shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project.) Res~i~[i~I~ "~/~. 79-7~ Page 4 E. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its location to existing and future neighborhood commercial shopping centers. For the purposes of this section a "neighbor- hood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum). 1. More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points). 2. More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). 3. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). 4. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). 5. Proiect is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). F. Project Maintenance The project provides for a Homeowner's Association and/or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site main- tenance (3 points). (NOTE: If the City determines that there are no public right-of-ways within or adjacent to the project that normally require city maintenance, the project will receive the maximum points in this category). SECTION 2: SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN The Growth Management Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of lot sizes and configurations to accommodate terrain and street design, and also, variabilitv of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations. If this categ~ry does not apply to a Residential Development Project, then such project will receive the maximum number of points (up to 10 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. A. Site Orientation 1. Minimizes crowding and enhances spacial relationships (e.g. by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots). 2. Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing layout. 3.Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites. 4. Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation. Resolution No. 79-74 Page 5 5. Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks, proper location of air conditioning units, living areas and the like. 6. Creates visual relief along residential streets (e.g., varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc.). B. Street Design 1. The design of streets and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while maintaining acceptable fire response time. a. Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvilinear street design and/or other design techniques. b. Avoids short blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul-de-sacs) whenever possible. c.Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods. d. Parking access is from local streets rather than secondary or major streets. 2. Public transportation is encouraged by the project. a. Locates bus stops as part of the development wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus routes. b. Provides bus pullout areas and covered waiting areas for user wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus routes. 3. Varies sidewalk dimensions and patterns to avoid monotony. 4. Provides handicapped access to the project. SECTION 3: ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than "leap-frog development". Two-thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that is within 500' of existing development or 500' within proposed development which has been approved by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including, but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements (6 points maximum). SECTION 4: DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design The Design Review Committee (consisting of two appointed members of the Planning Commission and the Director of Community Development or his designate), shall review each project for architectural design quality as indicated by the quality of construction and by the architectural elevations of the proposed buildings judged in terms of architectural style, size and height. A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). Resolutt~n Nc~. 79-74 Page 6 Criteria The following criteria represents the general types of Architectural Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. It is not the intent of the Growth Management Plan to dictate a particular architecture nor to encourage certain priced materials nor dictate specific design solutions. It is the intent of the Growth Management Plan to foster creative design solutions and to discourage discriminatory review of higher cost versus lower cost projects. 1. Provides various visual and tactile textures by using an assortment of building materials to finish surface. 2. Creates variety in design and architecture that creates strong identity. a. Project provides a mix of differing one story dwellings and/or a mix of one and two story dwellings to achieve a variety of housing mix and to reduce the sameness of the project. b. Varies the types of building materials within a project to create diversity, yet not creating excessive contrasts. c. Varies the color and design of housing units with particular attention to common themes without creating excessive contrasts. d. Provides special design features such as curvilinear walks, textured walkways, etc. B. Landscape and Screening Design The Design Review Committee shall review each project for Landscape and Screening Design. Such review will determine compatibility of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, walls and fences, mounding, paths, lighting, etc., with the topography and site characteristics of the project. A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (]0 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Landscape and Screening Design elements the Design ~eview Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. Each criteria may or may not apply to both single family dwellings and multi- family dwellings. If such criteria is not applicable, and no landscaping is required by the city, then the project will be eligible for the maximum number of points in this category. 1. Landscaping materials are utilized to provide home privacy and also screen trash and storage areas. 2.Landscaping techniques and building materials are used to enhance the quality of the site and architecture. 3. Project provides interior parkway landscape and irrigation improvements. Resolution No. 79-74 Page 7 4 Planting materials blend with and enhance the architectural design of the development. 5 Fences, hedges, walls, etc., are compatible with and enhance the architectural design of the development. 6 Trees are used for screening adjacent streets andlenhancing site quality. 7 Stabilization of slopes is promoted by landscaping techniques which prevent slope erosion. 8 Lighting sources are screened to minimize light spill over from one house to its neighbor. 9 Drought resistent plants are utilized. 10. Earthen berms are placed to delineate the use of spaces, provide privacy, reduce noise, control wind, mitigate flooding, frame views, etc. 11.Grouped parking areas are landscaped to provide shading and visual screening from streets and buildings. 12. Apartment/condominium and condominum conversion tree planting meets or exceeds the City standard of 50 trees/gross acre. C. Energy Conservation The Growth Management Committee shall review each project submitted for provisions of passive and active energy conservation techniques used in terms of architectural design, landscaping, and site orientation (5 points maximum, partial points may be achieved). 1. Building orientation and landscaping are designed to maximize the use of passive solar heating in winter months and cooling winds in summer months. a. Buildings are situated to maximize passive solar heating in winter months (e.g., east-west aligned onits, south facing windows, etc.) (1 point). b. Windows are placed to allow cooling from prevailing westerly summer breezes (1/2 point). c. Tree planting considers any effects on the use or rutrue installation of residential solar energy collectors 1/2 point). 2. Units are pre-plumbed for adaption to solar energy heaters (2 points). 3. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are incorporated into the architectural design, (e.g., reduced consumption shower heads, better grade insulation, double pane windows, etc.) (1 point). 4. Development provides option to homebuyers to purchase solar energy collectors for heating purposed (2 points). SECTION 5: AFFORDABLE HOUSING The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the provision of adequate housing for all segments of the population in order to create diversified neighborhood environments and income groups, avoiding concentrations of any single income group in one particular neighborhood. Page 8 Those residential development projects which provide "affordable" housing shall be given additional point consideration as well as opportunities for density bonuses. For purposes of this section, Affordable Housing is defined as: Owner Occupied: Projects which are sponsored through government programs or privately financed through market rate programs having a price range of 3.5 times 80-120% of the current median family income of San Bernardino County consistent with the City's Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). This income figure shall be readjusted annually and is currently $14,800.* Renter Occupied: Fair market rent in San Bernardino County as defined by Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act which shall be readjusted periodically and is currently:** # of Bedrooms Detached Semi-detached/Row Walkup Elev (2-4 stories) 0 - - 262 280 1 - 348 316 336 2 460 425 377 399 3 512 ~71 409 4 568 535 454 The above figures include the price of utilities and may be increased by not more than 10% if allowable by the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act. For projects which do not include utilities in the rental rates, the following deductions from the above described fair market rates shall be made: # of Bedrooms Deductions for Utilities 0 25 1 30 2 35 3 40 4 45 *Median family income of San Bernardino County is current as of January, 1979. **Fair market rent is current as of April, 1979. Criteria 1. Affordable housing shall be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Project provides 15% or more affordable housing (6 points, up to 20% density bonus). b.Project provides 5 to 15% affordable housing (4 points, up to 10% density bonus). c. Project provides 1 to 5% affordable housing (2 points, up to 5% density bonus). Ru, solution No. 79-74 Rest~lution 79-7'~ Page 9 Page 9 (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Affordable Housing shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project. This section may not be implemented until the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance have been amended to allow for density bonuses). SECTION 6: PLANNED COMMUNITIES AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS P.U.D.) A. Planned Communities The Growth Management Committee shall review each project submitted as a Planned Community for the degree to which it achieves a variety of bousing types, provides public facilities and services, efficient internal circulation and overall integration of residential design factors. For purposes of this ordinance, an application submitted as a Planned Community must consist of a minimum of 300 acres (up to 3 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider when evaluating Planned Communities. Such developments may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. 1. Provides for a variety of housing types and costs to complement existing housing in the immediate area; i.e., Owner Occupied: single family, multi-family ~ownhouses, condominiums); Rental: Apartments, duplexes '~d elderly family. 2. Provides for necessary public facilities, e.g., sewer and water lines, fire facilities, school facilities, etc., to serve the residents of the development. 3. Provides an efficient internal circulation svstem designed to maximize safety and minimize congestion and monotony, which is integrated with the City's Master Street Plan. 4. Creates various and diverse architectural and site design themes throughout the development, however, not over exagerating any one theme. B. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) which are not a part of an adopted Planned Community shall receive 1 point for each 5 acres of planned unit development not to exceed a total of 3 points for the entire project. SECTION 7: CUSTOM LOT/TRACT SUBDIVISIONS This section will evaluate those factors applicable to Custom Lot/Tract Subdivisions and derive a point rating which would apply to any future residential development project of five units or more. For approved Custom Lot Subdivisions that are later proposed to be built as a whole or total project of five or more units and for Tract Subdivisions that have received Planning Commission approval, re-application shall be required under Total Development, Section 1, of this Resolution to receive further ratings in the Design Quality, Affordable Housing, and Page lO Planned Communities and P.U.D.'s sections as a condition of approval prior to the approval and recordation of the Final Map. If the subdivision requires substantial changes in the originally approved map, then a re- review shall be required under Sections 1,2, & 3 of this resolution. Applications for Custom Lot/Tract Subdivision shall be rated using the following criteria: A. Public Services 1. Drainage Facilities The Growth Management Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff. A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). a. Project drains into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated (8 points). b. Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which are capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points). c. Project provides special drainage facilities (e.g., on-site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (1 point). (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned development, etc., Drainage Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project). 2. Street Circulation and Improvements The Growth Management Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and by its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project. A project must receive a minimum of 5 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). a. Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (5 points). b. Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points). c. Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points). d. Project will build or widen a collector street or is located adjacent to a fully improved collector street (2 points). e. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by the City Standards (2 points). Resolution No. 79-74 Page 11 (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project). 3. Residential Safety and Security The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department and the Foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project incorporates safety and security techniques. A project must receive a minimum of 3 points in each of the following categories in order to receive further consideration (8 points maximum). a. Police Protection (4 points maximum) 1. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Commission or Community Development Director on over 70% of its perimeter (2 points). 2. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Commission or Community Development Director between 25% and 70% of its perimeter (1 point). 3. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points). 4. Security devices such as window locks will be installed in each unit (1 point). 5. · Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting placement, etc., to enhance residential security (1 point). (NOTES: 1. For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Police Protection shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project. 2. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements of a(1) and a(2). 3. If the applicant opts for points a(3), a(4), and a(5), these will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map). Page b. Fire Protection (4 points maximum 1. 70% - 80%.of the project is within a three minute driving response time of a fire station (4 points). 2. 70% - 80% of project is between a three and five minute driving response time of a fire station (2 points). 3. 70% - 80% of project is between a five and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (1 point). 4. Fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistent building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) are incorporated into the design of the project (2 points). (NOTE: If the applicant opts for point 4, it will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map). 4. Parks and Paths The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and/or private parks and usable open space. A project must receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum). a. Project provides on or off site public park improvements and/or school recreational facilities (1 point). b. Project provides privately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point). c. Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and/or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (1 point). d. Project provides trails or bikeways (] point). e. Over 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of an existing public park site (4 points). f. Over 50% of project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park site (1 point). g. Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of an existing public park site (2 points). b. Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of a future proposed public park site (1/2 point). i. More than 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of usable public open space other than public parks. (e.g., school facilities, National Forest, etc.) (2 points). (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, provision of parks shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project. RL~SOlUtLOn N~l. 79-72 Page 13 5. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its location to existing and future neighborhood commercial shopping centers. For the purpose of this section, a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum). a. More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points). b. More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). c. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). d. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). e. Project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). 6. ~roiect Maintenance The project provides for a Homeowner's Association and/or Ua~ntenance District to ensure both on and oft site !~/aintenance (3 points). (NOTE: If the City determines that there are no public riZht-of-waVs within or adjacent to the project that normally require city maintenance, the project will receive the maximum points in this category). B. Site Orientation and Street Design The Growth Management Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of lot sizes and ci~nfiRurations to accommodate terrain and street design, and al~o, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations. If this category does not apply to a Residential Development Project, then such project will receive the maximum number of points (up to 10 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represents the general types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Project may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. Site Orientation 1. Minimizes crowding and enhances spatial relationships (e.g., by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots). 2. Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing layont. 3. Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites. Resolution No. 79-74 Page 14 4. Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation. 5. Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks, proper location of air conditioning units, living areas and the like. 6. Creates visual relief along residential streets (e.g., varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc.). Street Design 1. The design of street and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while maintaining acceptable fire response time. a. Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvi- linear street design and other design techniques. b. Avoids short blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul-de-sacs) whenever possible. c.Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods. d. Parking access is from local streets rather than secondary or major streets. C. Orderly Development The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than "leapfrog development". Two-thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that is within 500' of existing development or within 500' of proposed development which has been approved by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, ect., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements (6 points maximum). SECTION 8: THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT The City Council hereby sets a Threshold Point Limit of 68 points for Total Development and 43 points for Custom Lot/Tract Subdivisions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts Resolution No. 79-74 establishing the Residential Assessment System. Resolution No. 79-74 Page 15 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1979. AYES: Schlosser, Bridge, Mikeis, Palombo, Frost NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: ~~ Ma~r_~ RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM - TOTAL DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY MAX. POINTS PERCENTAGE I. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities 10 (8 pts. min) 11.1% B. Street Circulation and Improvements 10 (5 pts. min) 11.1% C. Residential Safety & Security 1. Police Protection 4 (3 pts. min) 4.4% 2. Fire Protection 4 (3 pts. min) 4.4% D. Parks & Paths 6 (2 pts. min) 6.7% E. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center 3 3.3% F. Project Maintenance 3 3.3% 40 44.3% II. SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN 10 11.1% III. ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT 6 6.7% IV. DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design 10 (8 pts. min) 11.1% B. Landscape & Screening Design 10 (8 pts. min) 11.1% C. Energy Conservation 5 5.6% 25 27.8% V. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6 6.7% VI. PLANNED COMMUNITIES & PUD'S 3 3.3% TOTAL: 90 Points 99.9% THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT: 68 Points (NONE: Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding). Resoiu[j~m ~;~, 79-74 Page 17 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM - CUSTOM LOT/TRACT SUBDIVISIONS CATEGORY MAX. POINTS PERCENTAGI. I. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities 10 (8 pts. min) 17.9% B. Street Circulation and Improvements 10 (5 pts. min) 17.9% C. Residential Safety & Security 1. Police Protection ~ (3 pts. min) 7.1% 2. Fire Protection 4 (3 pts. min) 7.1% D. Parks and Paths 6 (2 pts. min) 10.7% E. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center 3 5.4% F. Project Maintenance 3 5.4% 40 71.5% II. SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN 10 17.9~ III. ORDEREY DEVELOPMENT 6 10.7% TOTAL: 56 Points 100.1% THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT: 43 Points (NOTE: Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding).