HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-205 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NOJ 89-205
A RESOLDTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT
AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02,
REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH
LEG OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY
THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO
APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION
WITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH
ENGINEERING STUDY
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve
as follows:
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
(iii) On the 15th of March, 1989, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing, concluded said
hearing on that date; and heard and considered the Planning Commission
reconm~endation of approval; and
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council
hereby specifically finds as follows:
Resolution No. 89-205
Page 2
a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club
Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an
existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination
of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment
creates operational difficulties with traffic ~ow on
Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A
feasible realignment has been determined by an in-depth
. traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign
Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east
of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard.
b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from
Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific
railroad crossing is zoned special commercial.
The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from
Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special
commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern
Pacific rail road crossing is zoned community commercial.
North and south of these commercial zones are residential
areas.
c) This amendment does not convict with the 'Circulation
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for
development, within the district, in a manner consistent
with the General Plan and with related development; and
d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a
significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearings and upon. the
specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph ! and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a) The amendment does not convict with the Circulation
policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element
of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan; and
Resolution No. 89-205
Page 3
d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, on the 15th day of March, 1989, hereby
approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of May, 1989.
AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A./Authelet, City Clerk
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 3rd day of
May, 1989.
Executed this 4th day of May, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
~Beverly ~. Authelet, City Clerk