HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-93 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 81-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE
DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI-PURPOSE, COMMUNITY AND
LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for
the design of trails within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and adopted a
similar Resolution establishing standards for the design of Regional
Multi-Purpose, Community and Local Feeder Trails within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Council's desire to establish these
same standards by City Council Resolution for the development of trails
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby establish the following design standards as attached Exhibit
"A" for trails.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PhilLip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR TRAILS
SECTION 1: Trail Width:
(in feet)
Regional Multi-purpose
Trails 30'
Community
Trails 20'
Local Feeder Trails 15'
On Street/Off Street Bike Trails 5'
(See Exhibit A)
Clearance: 10' overhead with brush and weeds, debris and
rocks removed from trail tread.
In instances where topography, right-of-way configuration
grading or existing vegetation make it infeasible to construct
full width trails as listed above, the City Planner may grant
relief and reduce said requirements.
Resolution No. 81-~3
Page 3
CO/ PIUNF/ /L,
7" ,~
/, oCA /_ FFEDE, R IL
SECTION 2: Design Requirements:
a. For equestrian usage the following requirements shall be met:
1. Vertical Grade:
0-5% optimum
10% maximum for distances over 500'
15% maximum for distances limited to 500'
20% permitted only in extreme cases and
for short distances under 100'
2. Cross Section:
1-4% optimum
6% maximum in approved locations only
3. Drainage:
Avoid erosion by proper grading. Where
necessary, use diversionary devices such
as water bars and herms.
4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill:
2: 1 maximum
5. Surfacing:
Native soil, decomposed granite or chopped
tree trimmings. REmoval of rocks and debris
and grade surface smooth.
b. For bicycle usage, the following requirements shall be met:
1. Vertical Grade:
0-5% optimum
10% maximum for distances limited to 200'
2. Cross Section: 2% maximum
3. Surfacing:
3" aspbaltic concrete or 4" portland concret
cement.
4. Design Speed:
11 MPH average, 7-15 MPH
5. Curvature: 15 MPH maximum
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 4
VECHICLE BARRIERS
DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 5
,~y',z-//~/f"~__,.
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 6
SECTION 3: Fencing:
ae
For Regional Multi-Purpose Trails: Along Flood Channels fencing shall consist
of a 6' chainlink fence installed by the Flood Control District, Corps of
Engineers, or the City of Rancho Cucamonga atop the flood control channel
wall. The adjacent developer shall be responsible for the installation of
a 6' high chainlink fence installed at a joint property line for the length
of the co-terminus boundary. Openings shall be made for access at aDproved
points and for where local Feeder Trails and Community Trails intersect.
be
For Community Trails: Fencing along street trails (i.e. parkways) shall
consist of 4'-5' high No-rail white extruded concrete fence installed alone
the ultimate right-of-way line for the street, where there are no existing
block walls; otherwise, fencing shall be located at curb line. Openi?~s shall
be provided where Local Feeder Trails or Regional Multi-Purpose Trails inter-
sect. For trails not alonE streets, no fencing shall be required.
Ce
Local Feeder Trails: Fencing shall consist of one rail, 4' high, wood split
rail fencing, installed along the co-terminus boundary of the easement and
the non-easement property of the tract or lot.
SECTION 4: Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to provide for
equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicle access (See
Exhibit B), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unobstructed
vehicular access for service vehicles.
SECTION 5: Bicycling Trail requirements ahll be as shown below:
i
Parked Car
8' or 10'
I
TYPE I SHARED BIKEWAY
TYPE II SHARED BIKEWAY
TYPE III RESTRICTED BIKEWAY
Bicycle
Operating
Bicycle
OIM, ra~ing
Bicycle
Operat,ng
IE
IE
I
Motor Vein,cle
Operaling
10' Or 11'
Motor Vehicle
Operabng
10' or 11'
Motor Veh,c!e
Operating
lO'orlY
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 7
Shared Bikeways: The shared bikeway has no barrier, either symbolic or
physical, to delineate the roadway for bicycles. The bikeway is identified
by signs posted along the side of the roadway or by pavement markings painted
on the roadway. The outside traffic lane becomes the width required for
motor vehicle travel, usually 10 or 11 feet, plus the 5-foot bikeway. Bicycle-
flow is always the same direction as motor-vehicle-flow since this is much
safer. Shared bikeways can be developed in conjunction with pedestrian
traffic. However, this practice is discouraged, since pedestrian-flow and
bicycle-flow are not yery compatible.
Restricted Bikeway: It is clearly delineated by a barrier and signing.
Adequate delineation is an essential requirement for the development of a
restriced bikeway. Barriers are symbols, such as those made with paint on
a pavement.
Symbol barriers include striping, full-width coloring and reflectorized
raised pavement markers.
Minimum Criteria For Shared and Restricted Bikeways: The following criteria
shall be considered:
1. Average daily traffic (motor vehicle)
2. Bicycle volume
3. Posted speed limit
4. Truck Traffic
5. Adequate right-of-way
6. Safety
SECTION 6: Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross
existing or porposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be
maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such ~ bridges, ramp
ways, culverts, etc.
SECTION 7: Signing:
where the trails are.
a. Equestrian:
Signing is required to let the user and the public know
b. Hiking:
c. Pedestrian:
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 8
Bike:
e. Informational:
NO
MOTOR
VEHICLES
BEGIN
RIGHT TURN LANE
YIELD TO BIKES
USE
PED
SIGNAL
YIELD
TO
PEDS
LANE
,,, AHEAD
ONLY
'KEEP'
LEFT RIGHT
IJ~]PARKING'
BIKE
LAME
BIKE
LANE,
,=_
Resolution No. 81-93
Page 9
SECTION 8: Street Crossings: Shall be at grade with appropriate street
stripping and signing. In cases of equestrian usage, texturized paving is
desirable.
SECTION 9: Waivers: The Planning Con~nission may grant a waiver from the re-
quirements of this Resolution except Section 1 when:
(a)
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified re-
gulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hard-
ship inconsistent with the objectives of this Resolution'.
(b)
There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved that do not apply generally to other pro-
perties.
(c)
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified re-
gulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners
of other properties in the same zone.
(d)
The granting of the waiver will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the
Same zone.
(e)
The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
Any request for waiver shall be presented in writing and be made as part of the
development application for the project which involves the trail.
(per Planning Commission Resolution No. 81-53)