HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-116 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO~ 89-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ·TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
11780, A REQUEST.TO SUBDIVIDE 1.01 ACRES OF LAND I·NTO TWO
LOTS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF ALMOND STREET AND MAI STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-071-55
A. Recitals.
(i) MelVin Kornblatt has filed an application for the issuance of
the Tentative Parcel Map 11780 as described in the title of thi. s Resolution.
Hereinafter,in this Resolution, the·subjec~ Tentative Parcel Map.is referred
to as ."the application".
(ii) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed·public hearing bn the application.
After considering all public testimony, the Planning Commission denied said
application due to "no action".
(iii) On March 15, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to hear an appeal on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho.Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearinO on March 15, 1989 including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
northeast corner of Almond and Mai Streets with a street frontage of 220 feet
along Almond Street and 200 feet along Mai Street. The property is currently
developed with one single family residence; and
(b) The properties to the north, east, and west of the subject
site are presently designated for residential uses and are currently developed
with single family dwellings. These properties range in size from 0.6 to 3.2
acres in size. Therefore, these properties could not be further subdivided
because they would exceed the General Plan Very Low Residential density. The
property to the south of the subject site is designated for residential uses
and is currently vacant; and
Resolution No. 89-116
Page 2
(c) The application contemplates a subdivision of the property
into two lots; Parcel i being 23,908.1 square feet in area and Parcel 2 being
20,000.3 square feet in area .which is an. average lot area of 21,952 square
feet. Therefore, the.subdivision, as proposed, does not meet the average lot
size requirement of 22,500 square feet as specified in Section 17.08.040 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for lots, with Very ~Low Residential
District. Hence, the applicant, fileda-related Variance request.
(d) The placement of the house on-parcel,1 was located in such
a way to give the impression that no future lot splits were anticipated. As a
result, the proposed property line is skewed at unusual angles in order to
achieve the necessary square footage to meet the minimum lot size-requirement,
which is not conducive to the subdivision of the property.
· 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to .this .Council
during the above-referenced publ.ic, hearing and.-upon the speci, fic findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this'Council.hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the map is not consistent with the General Plan.
(b) That the site is not physically suitable for.the-proposed
density or development.
4. Based upon .the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1989,. -
AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, WrSght _
NOES: None . ....
ABSENT: None
Dennis L. -St~ut, Mayor
ATTEST: '
Beverly/A. Authelet, City Clerk
Resolution NoJ 89-116
Page 3
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day of
April, 1989.
Executed this 6th day of April, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
· Authelet, City Clerk