The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About85-202 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 85-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 4 AND 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 4 AND 5 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of May, 1985, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 85-147 to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 which Resolution of Intention No. 85-147 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning.the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Raneho Cueamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 for the fiscal year 1985-86 and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 85- 147, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3 Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal year 1985-86 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1985. AYES: Wright, Buquet, Dahl, King NOES: None ABSENT: Mikels Richard M. Dahl, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Raneho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Raneho Cueamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of June, 1985. Executed this 20th day of June, 1985 at Rancho Cueamonga, California. Beverly A.~uth~let, City Cle~rk Resolution No. 85-202 Page 2 1985-86 Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 4 and 5 B~CTION ~. AUTBORITI FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) b~TION P. ~]~AL DE3CRIP'rlON The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1984-85 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1985-86 of the following maintenance districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 564,503 sq. ft., General City Victoria Planned Community Terra Vista Planned Community Tr. 11915-1, Tot Lot & Open Sapce Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of parkway improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as 1/2 a lot. SECTION 3- PLAN~ AND SPECIFICATIONB Parkway improvements were constructed by the developers for th~ individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map of development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the parkway areas. The plans and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual development are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all i~rigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. b'ECTION 4. ~,gT]]~.A'I'BD CO~.~TB No costs will be incurred for parkway initial landscaping improvement construction. All initial improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1985- 86 are as follows: Resolution No. 85-202 Page 3 Landscape F~ainten~nce District ~O. 1 1984-85 Estimated Assessment Costs $.17 x 377,077 sq. ft. = $64,103.09 1984-85 Actual Cost Summary Utilities $8,638.00 City Labor & Admin. 239.45 Contract Maint. 22,966.86 Weed Control 263.79 Actual assessment received ($48,549.88) less Actual Cost ($32,108.10) = $ 16,441.78 for restoration. 1985-86 Estimated Assessment Cost $.17 X 564,503 sq. ft. = $95,965.51 Total Assessable Lots 1985-86 = 1541 Single Family 2233 Multi-Family Assessments: Single Family - $38.00 X 1541 = 58,558 Multi-Family - $19.00 X 2233 = 42,427 100,985 With this report the previous spread method is being amended. Only those tracts which have begun building are being assessed. The spread method is as follows: Single Family Unit = 1 Assessment Unit, Condominiums and Apartments = 1/2 Assessment Unit. Proposed Assessment for 1985-86 is $38.00 per single family unit and $19.00 per Condominium or Apartment unit. Landscape ~-tenanee District ~o. 2 (Victoria Planned Ccesunity) The estimated costfor Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 comprising 745 units is shown as follows: Victoria Park Lane, 450,000 sq. ft. X $0.33/Sq. Ft. = Trails and Parkways, 84,799 sq. ft. X $0.33/Sq. Ft. = Trees, 745 X $5/Tree = Parkway Reconstruction = $135,000.00 $ 27,983.00 $ 3,725.00 $ 89,114.73 $255,822.73 1985-86 Assessment $166,708 divided by 745 units = $223.77 1851.55 vacant acres at 1/4 Assessment = $89,114.73 C. Landscape ~-tenanee District No. ~ (Term Vista) The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal year 1985-86 involves 611 dwelling units of Tracts Nos. 12316, 12316-1, 12317, 12317-1, 12364, 12364-1, 12365, 12402, 12590-1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12590-4, 12590-5, and 12590-6 is as follows: Parks 5 acres ~ $5000/acre Parkways & Gateways 135,579 S.F. at $0.35/s.f. Trails & Greenway landscaping 26,935 S.F. at $0.35/s.f. Medians 65,595 S.F. at $0.15/S.F. Trees - 1257 at $5/each $25,000.00 $50,838.75 $ 9,~40.25 $10,241.75 $ 6,285.00 $ 102,205.75 Assessment units Single family 425 d.u. x 1 unit = Multlfamily 422 d.u. x .5 unit = 425 assessment units 211 assessment units %~'~assessment units Estimated assessment rate = $ 102,205.75 divided by 636 = $160.70 Resolution No. 85-202 Page 4 D. L~z~e ~l~te~e~e DIstrict ~. S The estimated maintenance for 1985-86 for the 720,700 S.F. of open space and the tot lot consisting of 3,300 S.F. for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 as follows: Total Annual Miintenance of Open Space & Tot Lot $.030 x 24,000 S.F. = $7,200 divided by 44 units = $163.64 SECTION 5 ~ DIAGit~N $7,200 A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagrams are attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. (Assessment Diagrams are on file in the City Clerk's office). TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1985-86: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 = 3,774 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 = 1,210 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 = 636 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 = 44 ANNEXATION S]]Be4ARI (198q-85) Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 12386 54 P.H. 12332-1 53 S.F. 12238 74 S.F. 12530 4 S.F. 12523 35 S.F. 11577 7 S.F. P.M. 7827 305 12320 60 Condos 12490 144 Condos 11606-1 44 10046 27 10047 43 12721 270 Condos 9619 31 12525 122 S.F. 12539 12540 12541 12091 248 Condos 11781 76 Condos 12772-1 20 S.F. 12621 90 T.H. 11625 102 Condos 12362 88 Condos 9539 19 S.F. 11893 35 S.F. 12801-1 33 S.F. 10035 38 S.F. 2022 units TRACT NO. OF UNITS Resolution No. 85-202 Page 5 TRACT 12590-1 12590-2 12590-3 12590-4 12590-5 12590-6 12365 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 NO. OF UNITS SECTION 6. aSSESHMEMT 29 33 23 31 32 32 270 450 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 $38.00 S.F. $19.00 Condos. & Apts. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 $223.77 S.F. $55.94 per acre (Vacant Land) Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 $154.10 per Assmt. Unit $163.64 S.F. 1985-86 aSSESSM~S Improvemnts for the entire districts are found to be of general benefit to all lots within each District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the appropriate District.