HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/07/14 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY JULY 14, 1999 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chamber
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman McNiel __ Vice Chairman Macias _
Com. Mannerino __ Com. Stewart __ Com. Tolstoy __
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
May 26, 1999
June 23, 1999
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items am public hearings in which concemed individuals may voice
their opinion of the related projecL Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman
and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after
speaking.
A. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT, GENERALPLANAMENDMENT
98-02, AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -
AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing for a
proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors Village on 291.8
acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded
by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street,
future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek
Channel- APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and
36; 222-201-33; 227~161-33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-11, 12, and 14.
Related file: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01.
(A) Land Use changes for the following areas:
Subarea 1:
Subarea la -from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) and Community Facilities to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling ~.nits per acre) for approximately
7.67 acres of land, generally located on the south side of
Base Line Road, west of the winery; and consideration of
alternative land use designations of Community Facilities.
Subarea lb - from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), Park, and School for approximately 57.40
acres of land, generally located east of future Day Creek
Boulevard and 600 feet south of Base Line Road; and the
consideration of alternal~ive land use designations of
Community Facilities for the northeast side of the subarea,
immediately east of the winery.
Subarea 1c - from Low-IVledium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) for approximately 21.13 acres of land for the area
generally located south of Base Line Road and east of
future Victoria Park Lane; and consideration of retaining the
Low-Medium Residential designation.
Subarea ld-from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling
units per acre), Regional Related Office/Commercial, and
Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) for approximately :39.45 acres of land, generally
located on the north side of future Church Street and east of
future Day Creek Boulevard; and consideration of
alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-
14 dwelling units per acre!) and Medium-High Residential
(14-24 dwelling units per ;~cre).
Subarea le- from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling
units per acre) and Regior~al Related Office/Commercial to
Low-Medium Residential (,4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 13.76 acre.~ of land, generally located north
of future Church Street, we;st of future Victoria Loop Street;
and consideration of alternative land use designations of
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Medium-High Residential (:14-24 dwelling units per acre).
Page 2
" Subarea 2 - from Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and High Residential
(24-30 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 53 acres of
land, generally located on the west side of future Day Creek
Boulevard, north and south of future Church Street; and
consideration of retaining the Regional Related
Office/Commercial designation.
Subarea 3 - Re-align the boundaries of the Victoria Community
Plan to include approximately 26 acres of land from the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, generally located on the north side of Church
Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue; and a request to
change the land use designation from Office to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration of
alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and
consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda
Specific Plan with an Office designation or a mix of Office and
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre).
(B) Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of
the General Plan.
(C) Amend various graphics and text for the Victoria Community
Plan.
(D) Consideration by the City of alternative sites for Park and School
within the project area of the Victoria Community Plan.
(E) Modify the permitted and conditionally permitted uses and
various development and design standards for Regional Related
Office/Commercial, Regional Center, and Community Facilities
of the Victoria Community Plan.
The Environmental I m pact Report for this project was considered
on May 26, 1999. (Continued from June 9, 1999)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
98-02, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -
AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to re-align the
boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by re-designating
approximately 26 acres of land, generally located on the north side of
Church Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue to the Victoria
Community Plan; and consideration by the City of retaining the area in
the Etiwanda Specific Plan and retaining the land use designation of
Office; and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix
of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) -
APN: 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Victoda Community Plan
Page 3
Amendment 98-01. The Environmeqtal Impact Report for this project
was considered on May 26, 1999. (Continued from June 9, 1999)
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
98-10 - BARRATT AMERICAN - The design review of detailed site
plan and building elevations for previously recorded Tract 13316,
consisting of 123 lots on 84 acres of land in the Very Low Residential
District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side
of Archibald Avenue, north of Carrari Court - APN: 1074-061-15
through 27, 1074-041-08 through 21, 1074-591-01 through 16,
1074-461-04 through 21, 1074-601-01 through 14, 1074-611-01
through 16, 1074-021-02 through 26, and 1074-051-09 through 16.
Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-41 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM -
A request to modify a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to
add a 2-bay, 896 square foot auto detail building and a 55 square foot
carwash control kiosk to a service station with carwash and lube
facilities on 1.8 acres of land in the General Commercial District,
located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Hermosa Avenue -
APN: 209-041-09, 22, and 31.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 16026 -AMETHYST ESTATES I_. P. -A residential subdivision of
18 single family lots on 11.3 acres of land in the Very Low Residential
District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located west side of
Amethyst Street, north of Valley Vie;w Street - APN: 1061-401-03.
Related files: Variance 99-01, Pre-Application Review 99-01, Variance
87-14 and Tentative Tract 13674. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
F. VARIANCE 99-01 AMETHYST ESTATES L.P. - A request to reduce
the minimum required lot depth from 150 feet to 146.5 feet for 11 lots
in conjunction with the development of 18 single family lots on 11.3
acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre), located on the west ..side of Amethyst Street, north of
Valley View Street - APN: 1061-401-03. Related files Pre-Application
Review 99-01, Variance 87-14, and Tentative Tracts 16026 and
13674.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. (VVALGREENS) - A
request to construct and operate a drive-thru pharmacy, totaling
approximately 16,170 square feet in size, in the Neighborhood
Commercial District on approximately 1.15 acres of land, located on
the southeast corner of Carnelian and 19th Streets - APN: 202-541-
060. Related files: Variance 99-02, Tree Removal Permit 99-18, and
Page 4
' Preliminary Review 98-18. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration
of environmental impacts for consideration.
H. VARIANCE 99-02 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. (WALGREENS) -A
request to reduce the minimum number of parking spaces from 64 to
60 and to reduce the minimum and average landscape setbacks along
19th Street and Carnelian Street from the required minimum 25 feet
and average of 35 feet to 21 and 25 feet respectively at the southeast
corner of Carnelian and 19th Streets - APN: 202-541-60. Related
Files: Conditional Use Permit 99-10, Tree Removal Permit 99-18, and
Preliminary Review 98-18.
I. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT, TENTATIVE TRACT16000, AND
DESIGN REVIEW 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A
proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium
purposes; along with Design Review of 306 apartment units on 16
acres of land, located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The
site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East
Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre),
proposed development density is within the Medium High Residential
density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
V. NEW BUSINESS
J. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX - The
development of a fast food restaurant building totaling 2,478 square
feet on a 0.75 acre parcel within a proposed shopping center in the
Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of
Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-21. Related file: Conditional Use
Permit 97-19.
VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
K. USE DETERMINATION 99-02 - RAY'S BAIL BONDS - A request to
determine that a bail bond business is similar to Clerical and
Professional Services, which is a permitted use within the General
Commercial District of the Development Code.
VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place forthe general public to address the Commission. Items
to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
Page 5
VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS
L. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - (Oral report)
IX. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
l l :00 p. m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they sha/I be heard only
with the consent of the Commission.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A
WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOI.LOWING IN THE RAINS
ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 99-04
(GRABIEL).
I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby cel~ify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on July 8, 1999, at least 72 hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga.
Page 6
VICINITY MAP
· I
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMON!~&
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission,
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -
AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BACKGROUND: At the request of the applicant, the above items were continued from June 9 to
this meeting. The applicant has agreed to table his project until the first draft of the preferred land
use plan for his project area based on the City's General Plan Update. Attached is his letter,
(Exhibit "A") requesting a continuance to the second Planning Commission meeting in September.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue General Plan
Amendment 98-02, Victoda Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment 98-01 until September 22, 1999.
Respectfu , submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's letter dated July 8, 1999.
ITEMS A & B
AMERICAN I~EA~Y DEVELOPMENT
16~30 V~ntura IJo~levl~l/Sult8 4Ol/F~, Cali~il 914~
· ' (818) 981 4900 FAX(IIIS)9814~21
July 8, 1999
VIA FACSIMILE 909 477 2847
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Celifomia 91729
Re: ~cto. da A~qrs
Dear Nancy:
The puq~ose of this letter is to request a continuance of the Victoria Arbors
Community Plan Amendment Planning Commission Headrig, which is presently
scheduled for Wednesday, July 14, 1999, to the seoond Planning Commission
meeting in September. Due to ongoing discussions regarding our projed as it
relates to the citywide General Ran Amendment process, it is evident fiat we
need addffional time to review our project and come ba~ with a proper
response. As work progresses, we would welcome the opportunity to have one
Or more study sessions with the Commission in anticipation of arriving at a
consensus plan,
Thank you for your continued cooperation in moving our project along.
Very truly yours,
CUCAMONGA220, L.P.
By: American Beauty Development Co.
Its Agent
John M. Morrisette
Vice President / Development
JM:cif
RECEIVED
To: Brent Le Count
Associate Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive JUt 12 39
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
CityofRanchoCucamo~a
1 1999
PmnningDivisio~u Y 1,
Dear Mr. Le Count,
I am sending this letter over concern for the change in the
public hearing date concerning the proposed development for the
area at the north end of Archibald avenue on the east side of the
street (File No. DR-98-10, tentative tracts 13316, 15914).
Myself and many of my neighbors were at the planning commission '
meeting on June 9th. I presented the planning commission with a
petition signed by 23 residents of the area. Most of us marked
our calendar, and rearranged our schedules for the July 14th
hearing date. Now, there are signs posted which change the date
from the original July 14th date to August llth. If the date
must be changed, why not change it to one in September after
school has started and everyone is more likely to be in town?
Many residents would like to be present for this hearing and ask
for your consideration in this matter.
Thank you for your time.
Si ce~l~
~hannon~d~F"--~
9574 Hidden Farm Road
Alta Loma, Ca. 91737
cc: Brad Buller, City Planner
The Planning Commission
Bill Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro-Tem
Jim Curatalo, City Council
Bob DuttOn, City Council
Paul Biane, City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98-10 -
BARRATT AMERICAN - The design review of detailed site plan and building
elevations for previously recorded Tract 13316, consisting of 123 lots on 84 acres
of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre),
located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Carrari Court -
APN: 1074-061-15 through 27, 1074-041-08through 21, 1074-591-01 through 16,
1074-461-04 through 21, 1074-601-01 through 14, 1074-611-01 through 16,
1074-021-02 through 26, and 1074-051-09 through 16. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
BACKGROUND: At its June 9, 1999, meeting, the Planning Commission continued consideration
of the project for one month to allow staff and the applicant time to respond to issues raised
regarding the adequacy of the biological studies relied upon for preparation of the Initial Study. On
June 22, 1999, staff met with the applicant, the applicanrs biologist, and biologists from the San
Bernardino County Museum to discuss the matter. Staff has also consulted with the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. On July 7, 1999, staff
and the City Attorney met with the applicant. The applicant indicated that they are commencing
protocol surveys for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat.
CORRESPONDENCE: At the request of the Planning Commission, this item was advertised as
a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices
were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public
hearing to July 28, 1999, to allow time for further environmental review. Staff will send new public
hearing notices to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and re-post the
property.
Brad Bullet
City Planner
BB:DC:gs
ITEM C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9741 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM - A request to
modify a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to add a 2-bay, 896 square
foot auto detail building and a 55 square foot carwash control kiosk to a service
station with canhash and lube facilities on 1.8 acres of land in the General
Commercial District, located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Hermosa
Avenue - APN: 209-041-09, 22 and 31.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Backqround: Conditional Use Permit 9741 was approved by the Planning Commission on
April 22, 1998, and includes a service station/mini-mart. a carwash, and a lube facility. The
project is currently under construction.
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin~:
North o Retail (across Arrow Route); General Commercial District
South - Aim All Storage Project under construction; General Commercial District
East Apartments (across Hermosa Avenue); Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling
units per acre)
West Aim All Storage Project under construction; General Commercial District
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - General Commercial
North General Commercial
South - General Commercial
East Medium Residential
West - General Commercial
D. Site Characteristics: The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. The
previously approved service station/mini-mart, carwash, and lube facility are currently under
construction.
ITEM D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 9741 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM
July 14, 1999
Page 2
E. Parkinq Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Foota.qr~ Ratio Required Provided
Service Station/
Convenience M art 4, 162 1/250 17 17
Lube Facility 2 bays 3 + 2 per bay 7 7
Carwash 2.5/carwash 2.5 3
Car Detail Facility 2/per bay 4 7
Total 31 34
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The 896 square foot detail building is proposed to be located near the southwest
corner of the site, behind the carwash building now under construction. There are 15 parking
spaces located within 150 feet of the auto detailing building which are shared with the quick
lube and carwash. The 55 square foot kiosk structure is proposed to be located along the
south property line, just east of the carwash entrance. It is intended to serve as a control point
for the carwash where customers would interact with an operator. Both buildings are
proposed to match the approved architecture for the site in terms of overall massing, colors,
and materials. Both buildings are located within 5 feet of the adjoining public mini-storage
fa.ci!ity, also under construction; hence, will serve to visually break-up the long elevation of the
mare-storage facility.
The existing project includes a 4, 162 square foot gasoline dispensing station and convenience
mart with two pump islands under a 3,480 square foot canopy, a 2-bay lube facility, and a self
service drive-thru carwash. The station will operate 24 hours a day; however, the lube facility,
carwash, and detailing service will operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily.
B. Desiqn Review Committee: The project was considered by the Committee (McNiel, Stewart,
Henderson) on June 15, 1999, at which time the Committee recommended that the Planning
Commission approve the project.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical and Grading Review Committees have reviewed
the project and recommend approval subject to the conditions contained in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
D. Environmental Assessment: The application is exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the State
CEQA Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 97-41 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM
July 14, 1999
Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:BL:taa
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevation
Resolution Approving Modification to CUP 97-41
REVISED GRADING PLAN
ELEVATION
TYPICAL 5 V,
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION
TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-41 TO ADD A 2-BAY, 896
SQUARE FOOT AUTO DETAIL BUILDING AND A 55 SQUARE FOOT
CARWASH CONTROL KIOSK TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SERVICE
STATION WITH CARWASH AND LUBE FACILITIES ON 1.8 ACRES OF
LAND, IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND HERMOSA AVENUE
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 209-041-09, 22,
AND 31.
A. Recitals.
1. David Delrahim has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No.
97-41 Modification, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as '~he application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Arraw Route
and Hermosa Avenue with a street frontage of 240 feet on Hermosa Avenue and lot depth of 320
feet on Arrow Route and which is currently under construction for a service station with carwash and
lube facilities; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a commercial stdp
mall, the property to the south is being developed with a public storage facility, the property to the
east is developed with an apartment complex, and the property to the west being developed with
a public storage facility; and
c. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code;
and
d. The design of the proposed project, together with the conditions of approval, meet
all applicable provisions of the Development Code and the drive-thru policies; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 97-41 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM
July 14, 1999
Page 2
e. The development of the proposed project would not have a significant impact upon
the environment.
f. The application proposes a use which serves local needs for automobile related
services by providing a detailing facility and a drive-thru carwash in close and convenient proxmity
to homes and businesses.
g. The proposed parking is adequate to meet code requirements.
h. The proposed project site is buffered from residences to the south and west by
more than 150 feet of land now being developed with a pubic storage facility
i. The small buildings will help visually break up long building walls of the storage
project to the south and west.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code.
4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that, because of the small area
increases associated with the project identified in this Resolution, it is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below.
Planninq Division
1) The project shall comply with all applicable conditions of Conditional
Use Permit 97-41.
2) Provide vine planting at base of extedor walls for both buildings and
train vines to climb building walls.
3)Any aboveground-mounted equipment and/or roof-mounted equipment
shall be fully screened from adjacent streets.
4) All auto detailing operations shall be conducted within the proposed
building.
.PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 97-,41 MODIFICATION - DELRAHIM
July 14, 1999
Page 3
5) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or
operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for
consideration and possible termination of the use.
6) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as
defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels.
7) Materials and colors shall match the service station with carwash and lube
facilities.
En.qineerin.q Division
1 ) The project shall comply with all applicable conditions of Conditional Use Permit
97-41.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'R'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16026 -
AMETHYST ESTATES. L.P. - A residential subdivision of 18 single family lots
on 11.3 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre), located west side of Amethyst Street, north of Valley View Street
- APN: 1061-401-03. Related files: Variance 99-01, Pre-Application Review 99-
01, Variance 87-14 and Tentative Tract 13674.
VARIANCE 99-01 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P. - A request to reduce the
minimum required lot depth from 150 feet to 146.5 feet for 11 lots in conjunction
with the development of 18 single family lots on 11.3 acres of land in the Very
Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west
side of Amethyst Street, north of Valley View Street - APN: 1061-401-03.
Related files: Pre-Application Review 99-01, Variance 87-14, and Tentative
Tracts 16062 and 13674.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: 1.59 dwelling units per acre
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning:
North - Vacant; Flood Control and Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Existing Single Family; Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East Existing Single Family; Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West - Vacant; San Bernardino Flood Control Channel (Demens Channel)
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
North - Flood Control
South - Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West - Flood Control
ITEMS E & F
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
71'16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Backqround: This project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on May
25, 1988, under Tentative Tract 13674. Because of the severe impact of the recession
in the early 1990s, the applicant was not able to record the tentative map and develop the
project. On May 25, 1993, the tentative map expired, just four months prior to the
adoption of Senate Bill 428, which would have extended the tract map two more years.
E. Site Characteristics: The project is located on the west side of Amethyst Avenue, north
of Valley View Street. The site is currently vacant except for vineyard and scrub
vegetation. The site has a natural slope of approximately 8 to10 percent from north to
south, except for approximately 1.5 acres of land directly adjacent to the western property
line, which has slopes varying from 12 to16 percent. To the east of the site are single
family homes that front on to Amethyst Avenue. The south side is bordered by single
family homes and both north and west are the San Bernardino County Flood Control
Channel and Demens Basin.
TENTATIVE TRACT ANALYSIS:
A. General: The project is identical to the previously approved project. The applicant is
proposing to subdivide 11.29 acres into 18 single family lots. The project consists of a
subdivision map only; no house plans are proposed at this time. The site will be
developed as a gated community with a private loop street which has a reduced right-of-
way of 40 feet and a street width of 36 feet. The lots are oriented in a north and south
configuration, except for those along the western property line, which are oriented east
to west. Lot sizes within the subdivision will range from 20,070 to 48,960 square feet with
an average lot size of 23,872 square feet. The project will also be subject to Hillside
Development Standards. Grading techniques will be used (i.e., split level foundations
and/or stem wall construction) to work with existing contours and minimize grading
alterafions. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduction in the
required minimum lot depth for 13 lots.
B. Desiqn Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee
(McNiel, Stewart, Henderson) on a consent calender basis on June 1, 1999, and was
approved as presented.
C. Gradinq and Technical Review Committees: The Committees have reviewed the project
and recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of
Approval.
D. Trails Committee: The Master Plan of Trails identifies the west side of Amethyst Avenue
as a Community Trail The project proposes local feeder trails along the north, south, and
west boundaries of the project, which will be connected to the Community Trail on the
west side of Amethyst Avenue. Each lot on the perimeter of the site will have access to
the local feeder trail by the use of private gates. The Community Trail will boarder the
east property line and provide an east-west trail through the canter of Lots 13 through 16
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
for access. Horse corrals are proposed in the rear yard areas adjacent to the local feeder
trails. The Trails Committee recommended approval of the proposed trail system as
shown on the tentative map subject to a condition of approval requiring the developer to
construct Amethyst Community Trail south to Valley View Street within the existing public
right-of-way,
E. Nei__N~g_b_hborhood Meetin.q: On June 22, and July 6, 1999, neighborhood meetings were held
by the applicant to allow the neighbors within the immediate vicinity of the project an
opportunity to review the proposal prior to Planning Commission review. The residents
on the north side of Valley View Street, south of the project site, expressed their concern
about not having access to the proposed private local feeder trail on the south property
boundary of the project site. None of the existing homes south of the subject site, which
were developed prior to incorporation, have trail easements. The applicant commented
that he would consider granting access to the trail; however, because of liability and
maintenance issues involved, granting access may not be possible. Residents in
attendance were also concerned with the following issues: Existing traffic conditions on
Amethyst Street and the additional traffic generated by the project, on-site drainage from
the project site to Valley View Street and Amethyst Street, the construction of only the
west half of Amethyst Street and the Trails Committee's recommendation to extend the
proposed Community Trail south to Valley View. The residents did not object to the
proposed design and lot layout of the project.
F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been prepared by the applicant
and staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Staff feels the project will
not have a significant adverse environmental impact. However, air quality impacts may
occur during the site preparation, including grading and equipment exhaust as it is used
on site. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short term construction
impacts to a less than significant impact. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the
issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order.
FINDINGS: Before approving the application, the Planning Commission shall make certain
findings that the following circumstances do apply:
A. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
B. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is located.
C. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code.
D. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
'PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
VARIANCE ANALYSIS:
The proposed Variance is identical to the previously approved variance for this project. The
applicant has submitted an application requesting a Variance to allow a reduction in the
required minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 146.52 feet for Lots 10 through 14 and 16 through
18, from 150 feet to 146.72 feet for Lot 1, from 150 feet to 146.54 feet for Lot 2, and from 150
feet to 143 feet for Lot 3. The reduction of a few feet in lot dept is not significant.
The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development
standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape,
topography, location, or unusual characteristics would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed
by other properties in the vicinity and the same district.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In considering any request for a Variance, there are a series of
findings under State Law that must be substantiated by facts in order to approve the request.
Generally, these findings center around the uniqueness or special circumstances of a particular
property or the use of the designation.
The applicant is proposing to develop the site as a gated community with a private loop street,
oriented primarily east to west, which has a reduced right-of-way of 40 feet and a standard
street width of 36 feet. With the configuration of the site, the proposed street design allows the
development of additional lots, but results in the creation of 11 lots which do not meet the
required minimum lot depth of 150 feet. The requirement for the minimum lot depth insures the
creation of lots which are of similar size and configuration and thereby help to maintain the
character and density of the area. Staff believes that there are special or unique circumstances
with the development of this site that are different from other sites under similar zoning
designations. Therefore, the following facts are provided to support the required findings:
A. The configuration of the site, combined with the topography along the west and southwest
portions of the site, restricts the design of the subdivision. In order to minimize grading
to the slope areas, relatively deep lots are necessary along the western portion of the site.
The project has been designed to allow the creation of larger lots along the western
property line which range in size from 28,700 to 48,960 square feet while allowing for a
primary north to south orientation for the remainder of the lots.
B. The lots within the project meet the minimum and average lot size requirements for the
district and are 20,070 and 23, 870 square feet receptively.
C. Lots within the project are oriented primarily north to south, which is consistent with the
existing single family lots to the south, and are generally of the same size and
configuration although slightly wider than the existing.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
D. Existing single family lots to the east of Amethyst Avenue are generally three-quaders of
an acre or larger, with width depths varying from 220 to 233 feet. Lots south of the project
site range in size from approximately 19,140 square feet to 25,125 square feet. Those
to the southeast have average lot depths varying from 165 to 201 feet, whereas lots to the
southwest have an average lot depth of approximately 146 feet.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the ~
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative
Tract 16026 and Variance 99-01 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval
with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:RZ:taa
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution Approving TT 16026
Resolution Approving VAR 99-01
LOCATION~,4AP
TENTATIVE TRACT 16026
parcels
Strcct Centlines
0.3 0 0.3 Miles N
· .~.~'~- ~-~ _ "~,~, ~ ........ _+_ _ . ~_;,~.:~.~.: -
.'/" , ,- , ....... ',___ , , ~, _~ ' -_____.: ........
~: ·
-
· ~,. . : .....::~ - ~'_- .....~;
,.-'., ' ~, ",..-_~"-ZZ- ' ..............
~,:. ~ ~ --~,~.~,,~.< ~=': '~'~'~':' "~ :SUBDIVISION MAP
~ ................ .................. , .......... ............ , .~: ~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ~26
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Tentative Tract 16062 - Amethyst Estates L.P.
2. Related Files: Tentative Tract 13664 and Vadance 99-01
3. Description of Project:
A residential subdivision of 18 single family lots on 11.3 acres of land in the Very Low
Residential Distdct (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of
Amethyst Street, north of Valley View Street - APN: 1061-401-03. Related files: Vadance
99-01, Pre-Application Review 99-01, Vadance 87-14, and Tentative Tract 13674.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Amethyst Estates L.P.
8316 Red Oak Street, Suite # 201
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
6. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential Distdct (0-2 dwelling units per acre)
6. Zoning: Very Low Residential Distdct (0-2 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
North * Vacant; Flood Control and Very Low Residential ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Existing Single Family; Very Low Residential ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East Existing Single Family; Very Low Residential ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West Vacant; San Bemardino Flood Control Channel ( Demens Channel)
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Ddve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rudy Zeledon
Planning Assistant
(909) 477-2750
'10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Cucamonga County Water District
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than .Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Sewices
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biologicel Resources (f) Utilities and Service Systems
(V') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (V') Aesthetics
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
(V') Air Quality (i/') Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a signfficant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that eadier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed:
don
Plannir~ssistant
June 22, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Petentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page ,4
b) Seismic ground shaking? ) ( ) ( ) (V')
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Seiche hazards? ) ( ) ( (v')
e) Landslides or mudflows? ) ( ) ( (V')
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
f) The site will be graded to accommodate the proposed structure, trails, and streets.
Grading will be conducted under supervision of a licensed surveyor or civil engineer
to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The impact is not considered
significant.
S
4. WATER. IA~II the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?. ( ) ( ) (V') ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( )
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 5
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a) Paving and hard scape necessary to accommodate the project will result in
increased runoff from the site. Drainage will be conveyed to existing facilities which
have been designed to handle the flows.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a,b) Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and
equipment exhaust as it is used onsite. Major sources of emissions during this
phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and
fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling
over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading filling. NOx and
PM10 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis during construction. The following
mitigation measures will be required to reduce short term construction
impacts to a less-than significant level:
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall selectthe construction equipment used
onsite based on low emission factore and high energy efficiency. The
Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page ~
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended; thereby, decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and
kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation
of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each
day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust
from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down
such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the
day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of
the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil bindere to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractorshall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated
natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and
coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as
high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating
applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag
or sponge.
.Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 7
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp cu~es or dangerous inteme~ions) or
incompatible uses (e.g., b~ equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
neaffiy uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
e) H~ards or ba~em br pedest~ans or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
fi Confli~s with adopted policies suppoffing
alternative tmnspo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle rocks)? ) ( ) ( ) (f)
g) Rail or air traffic impa~s? ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
The project will result in the pa~ial improvement of Amethyst Street, as well as constm~ion
of a pdvate intedor loop street.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., hedtage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (V')
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ( ) (v')
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) (~/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 8
Comments:
The project site is currently vacant except for former vineyard and sparse vegetation. The
site has been recently cleared for weed abatement as a fire prevention measure. The soil
and vegetation on the site has been disturbed from annual discing; therefore, the site does
not contain intact sage scrub or chaparral vegetation, which has been identified as natural
habitat for the California Gnatcatcher and Kangaroo Rat.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( ) )
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?. ( ) ) (~/)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ) (~)
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable
brush. grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 9
10. NOISE. ~ll the proposal msult in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ) ( ) (f) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severn noise levels? ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
a) The project will increase existing noise levels sin~ the site is currently vaunt. The
project is not expeded to increase noise levels ~yond anticipated limits. The impa~
~s not considered signifi~nt.
,_=~e~-. .o
11, PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ( ) ( ) (~/)
b) Police protection? ( ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Schools? ( ( ) ( (V')
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ( ) ( (V')
e) Other governmental services? ( ( ) ( (V')
,.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (i/) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 10
Potentrally I
~ Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
Commen~:
e) As a condition of the trod approval, the appli~nt will be required to provide a
1 O-foot wide drainage easement on the vaunt lot adja~nt to the southwest corner
of the proje~ site for a storm drain. On-site drainage will be dimmed westerly from
the site through the vacant lot within the drainage easement. The resulting impa~
on se~ices in not likely to be signi~nt.
13, AESTHETICS, Would the proposah
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (v') )
c) New light and glare will be created since the site is currently vacant. The project is
not expected to increase light or glare beyond anticipated limits. The impact is not
considered significant.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontologicel resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 11
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal.'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restdct the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term. to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occum
in a relatively bdef, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
,TENTATIVE MAP 16026 Page 17
EARLIER ANALYSES
Eadier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
eadier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(v') General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(v') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
MITIGATION MEASURES
See Section 5 above.
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant environmental effects would
occur.
t ame .
h~FINAL~PLNGCOMM~NVDOG~Tl'16026.wpd
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
Ca~fornia Environmental Qua~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Pubtic Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16026 Public Review Period Closes: July 14, 1999
Project Name: Project Applicant: Amethyst Estates L.P.
Project Location (also see attached map): Located westside of Amethyst Street, north of ValleyView
Street-APN: 1061-401-03.
Project Description: A residential subdivision of 18 single family lots on 11.3 acres of land in the Very
Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). Related files: Variance 99-01,
Pre-Application Review 99-01, Variance 87-14 and Tentative Tract 13674.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
July 14, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVI NG TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 16026, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 18 SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS ON 11.3 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED
WEST OF AMETHYST STREET, NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW STREET -
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1061-401-03.
A. Recitals.
1. Amethyst Estates, L.P. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map
No. 16026, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application".
2. On the 14th day of July, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Amethyst Street,
north of Valley View Street with a street frontage of 666.51 feet and lot depth of 858.33 feet and
is presently unimproved; and
b. The properties to the north and west are vacant and are a part the San
Bernardino Flood Control Channel, the properties to the south and east contain single family
homes; and
c. The proposed subdivision has been reviewed by the Technical and Grading
Committees and approved subject to the conditions contained within this resolution; and
d. The proposed subdivision has a minimum and average lot size of 20, 070 and
23,872 square feet, respectively, consistent with the requirements of the Very Low Residential
District; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16026- AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
e. The related Variance application, Variance 99~01, was reviewed in conjunction with
the subdivision tract map and approved by the Planning Commission; and;
f. There is adequate space available on all lots for equestrian use.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and any applicable specific plans; and
b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division
1) Approval of the tract map is contingent on the approval of
Variance 99-01.
2) Final landscaping and irrigation plans for the parkway along Amethyst
Street and forthe interior street planting shall be submitted for review
and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to
recordation of the Final Tract Map.
3) All lot grading, whether in conjunction with a total design review or
individual custom lots, shall be subject to the Hillside Development
Ordinance. The project shall utilize grading techniques which
minimize alteration to the natural land form. These techniques shall
include minimal padding for units only, split level foundations, and/or
stem wall construction.
Enqineering Division
1 ) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the
existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the
opposite side of Amethyst Street shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted
unit amount times the length of the project frontage.
2) Cross lot drainage facility on north side of the private trail along Lots
1-4 shall be designed to handle off-site flows from the north. Drainage
facility shall transition to east side of trail along Lots 4-8. Concentrated
drainage shall not cross the trail. Provide underground facility.
3) On-site drainage to be directed westerly from the site shall be
disposed as follows in order of preference as approved by the City
Engineer, Building Official, and San Bernardino County Flood Control
District where appropriate:
'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
]'I' 16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
a) Directed southerly through the vacant lot adjacent to the
southwest corner of the site within an easement to Valley View
Street.
b) Directed westerly within the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District properly out-letting into Hellman Avenue, or
c) Directed westerly within the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District property out-letting into the existing earth channel
serving as an outflow from Demens Basin.
4) Trail and lot drainage existing at the southwest corner shall be
conveyed to either:
a) The south through a private easement to a point of discharge to
a public facility by a surface improvement maintained by the
Homeowners Association or;
b) The west to the channel in a surface improvement and
maintained by agreement executed with the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District.
In either case, absolute protection of southerly properties will be
provided with channels, berms, walls, or other acceptable devices as
determined in Plan Check based upon the Q 100 discharge.
5) The private drive shall be curved northerly within Parcel 15 as much
as possible to minimize height of fill slopes.
6) Maintenance of necessary off-site drainage facilities and the private
drive (Lot A) shall be included within the project CC&Rs.
7) Standard property line adjacent sidewalks shall be installed on at least
one side of the private drive, within easement if less than 60-foot wide
offer of dedication.
8) Provide commercial drive approaches per City Standard 101 Type C
for both project entrances. Trail shall cross drive approach at zero
curb face.
a) Gate median for soLjth entrance shall be set back 75 feet from
street. Provide 20 feet from median curb to driveway edge on
both sides of all medians and 27-foot radius for visitor
turnaround area.
b) North entrance shall no have median.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
"IF 16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
9) The equestrian fence on Amethyst Street shall be set back a sufficient
distance to assure adequate sight distance in accordance with the City
Line of Sight criteria at both private street intersections with Amethyst
Street.
10) The Community Trail along Amethyst Street shall be extended
southerly to the northwest corner of Amethyst and Valley View Streets.
The existing sidewalk in front of the property adjacent to the southeast
corner of the site shall be removed and the existing drive approach
may be reconstructed to City Standards with appropriate deflector
curbs, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
11 ) Use a straight grade crossfall of 1.70 percent per City Standard 100-A
for the private streets.
12) Drive approaches shall be constructed per City Standards, 24 feet
wide maximum, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The grade
break at the right-of-way where the drive approach and the driveway
join shall not exceed 14 percent.
13) San Bernardino county Flood Control District has an easement over
the northwest corner of the site. Lot B should be dedicated to the
District in fee.
14) Parkway shall be graded to drain towards the street at 2 percent from
12 feet back of the curb to the top of curb.
15) The driveways shall not exceed 6 percent for the first 6 feet from the
street right-of-way. Show all grade breaks. The maximum slope
allowed is 14 percent. Provide an 18-foot area in front of the garage
which does not exceed 5 percent. The flow line should be at least
5 feet from the garage and no more than 0.5 feet below the garage
floor elevation.
16) Install "No Parking Anytime" signs on the east side of Amethyst Street
from the projection of the north property line to Hillside Road.
17) The Developer shall acquire the proposed private drainage easement
from the property adjacent to the southwest corner of the site. Said
drainage easement shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Final Map.
Environmental Mitigated Measures
Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading
and equipment exhaust as it is used on site. Major sourues of emissions
during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and
equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles
F30
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'R' 16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 6
and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances
by grading filling. NOx and PM10 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis
during construction. The following mitigation measures will be required to
reduce impacts to a less-than significant level:
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the
overall length of the construction period should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and
to create a crust after each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is
completed; the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated
immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or
otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
E -F31
"PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16026 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 7
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel,
spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'I'I'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16026
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the M itigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Tentative Tract 16026
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for appreving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurrin9. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Ranche Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 16026 (Related file: Variance 99-01 )
SUBJECT: 18 Lot Subdivision
APPLICANT: Amethyst Estates L.P.
LOCATION: West Side of Amethyst Street North of Valley View Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements co~pletion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its .__/ /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternat ve
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard / /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building / /
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which /~
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and the
Development Code regulations.
2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and J /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Project No. TT 16026
Completion Date
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/__/__
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
5. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with / /
all receptacles shielded from public view.
6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be __/__/
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the __/__/
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
9. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed / /
control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner
review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to
approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all
trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced / /
with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement;
however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material.
b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as __._/.J
veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance
may be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs.
c. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0,5% at the downstream end of a trail for a J_ /
distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching
the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official.
d. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail .___/___/
with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet.
10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine /___/__
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appeal ing to boards of di rectors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs.
11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
Project No. ~l' 16026
Completion Date
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January I of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho /.__
Cucamonga Fire Protection Districl review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping /.__ __
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than ~ /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater .__/ /
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-
gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted
in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section
shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. Forsingle family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously / /
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the / /
Development Code and/or Hillside Ordinance. This requirement shall be in addition to the
required street trees and slope planting.
6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / /
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, / /
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
F. Other Agencies
Project No TT 16026
Completion Date
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shatl be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
G. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~ / __
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to / /
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant
shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit
issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation / _/
and prior to issuance of building permits.
H. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / /__
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformanca with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to /. / __
pei'form such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / /
5. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site / /
drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or / /
over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided __/ /
properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon
Project No. TT 16026
Completion Date
any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel
relative to which a building permit is requested.
d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division / /
for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis).
e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses ,,___/ /
or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other
alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided, This requirement
does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code.
6. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the / /
standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24.070.
7. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /.__/
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a
California Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be /__.J
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline):
42 total feet on Amethyst / /
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets. /...~/
4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. /. /
5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for .~/ /
approved openings: Amethyst Street.
6. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _.__/ /
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
7. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on
the final map.
J. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, / /
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City
Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,
AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees,
Project No ~'F 16026
Completion Date
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
I q Curb & I A.C. Side- Ddve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
Amethyst Street ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ / (e)(f)
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) R26 traffic signs. (f) Traffic striping and signage.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety J_ /
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, trafficsignal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /.____
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City reads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /__
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cress sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /__
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check, __/__./._
Project No. ~T' 16026
Comptetion Date
4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review __/ /__
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets,
fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in
addition to any other permits required.
5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _~/ /__
accordance with the City's street tree program.
6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /__
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
Ko Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting .__/ /__
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
L. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map __/ /__
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
2. A permit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its / /__
right-of-way.
M. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _._/ /._
electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /__
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /__.
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
N. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for / /__
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pdor to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
O. General Fire Protection Conditions
Proiect No. TT 16026
Comptetton Date
1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer _.__/ /
shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in,
or consummated, a Mello-Roos Comm unity Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the
development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time
recordation of the final map occurs.
2. Fire flow requirement shall be 1,750 gallons per minute. ~ /.__
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department / /._
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants /. /
shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy.
3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, / /._
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i .e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / /__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers,
5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be __/__/
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to J /._
final inspection.
7. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / _/__
All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. __/
8. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho /_ /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance.
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, / /._
UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
10, Project is located in a high fire hazard area and is subject to special wildland/urban interface / /..__
hazard mitigation requirements. Such requirements may include requirements related to
vegetation management plans, special construction enhancements, emergency access, water
supply, automaticfire extinguishing systems, and other special requirements. ASEPARATE
SET OF PLANS IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITtED DIRECTLY TO THE FIRE PREVENTION
NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT AT TIME OF PLAN SUBMITTAL TO BUILDING AND SAFETY,
Contact the Fire Prevention New Construction Unit located in the Building and Safety Division.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 99-01, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LOT
DEPTH: FROM 150 FEET TO 146.52 FEET FOR LOTS 10 THROUGH
14 AN D 16 THROUGH 18, FROM 150 FEET TO 146,72 FOR LOT 1, FROM
150 FEET TO 146.54 FOR LOT 2, AND FROM 150 FEET TO 143 FEET
FOR LOT 3 IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF 18 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AMETHYST AVENUE,
NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW STREET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (0-2 DVVELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-401-03.
A. Recitals.
1. Amethyst Estates. L.P. has filed an application for the issuance of Vadance No. 99-01
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance
request is referred to as "the application".
2, On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on west side of Amethyst Avenue, north
of Valley View Street with a street frontage of 666.51 feet and lot depth of 858.33 feet and is
presently unimproved; and
b. The properties to the north and west are vacant and are a part the San Bemardino
Flood Control Channel, the properties to the south and east consists of single family homes; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 99-01 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
c. The application has been submitted to allow a reduction in the required minimum
lot depth from 150 feet to 146.52 feet for Lots 10 through14 and 16 through 18, from 150 feet to
146.72 for Lot 1, from 150 feet to146.54 for Lot 2, and from 150 feet 143 feet for Lot 3; and
d. The lots within the project meet the minimum and average lot size requirements
for the district and are 20,070 and 23,870 square feet respectively; and
e. Lots within the project are odented primarily north to south, which is consistent with
the existing single family lots to the south, and are generally of the same size and configuration; and
f. That the variance as specified in the application will not be detrimental to the goals
and objectives of the General Plan or Development Code and will not promote a detrimental
condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity on the subject site for the reasons
that follow.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearin9 and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations
would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of the Development Code.
b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
e. Thatthe granting ofthe Variance will not be detrimenta tothepub chealth safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below.
1 ) Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued within
5 years from the date of approval.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
.PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 99-01 - AMETHYST ESTATES, L.P.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF ILatNCHO CUCAMONGA _ ~
STAFF RF, PORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-10 -
EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. (~NALGREENS) - A request to construct and operate a
drive-thru pharmacy, totaling approximately 16,170 square feet in size, in the
Neighborhood Commercial District on approximately 1.15 acres of land, located on the
southeast comer of Carnelian and 19th Streets - APN: 202-541-60. Related files:
Vadance 99-02, Tree Removal Permit 99-18, and Preliminary Review 98-18.
VARIANCE 99-02 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. (VVALGREENS) - A request to reduce
the minimum number of parking spaces from 54 to 60 and to reduce the minimum and
average landscape setbacks along Carnelian and 19th Streets from the required
minimum 25 feet and average of 35 feet to 21 and 25 feet, respectively at the southeast
comerof Carnelian and 19th Streets -APN: 202-541-60. Related files: Conditional
Use Permit 99-10, Tree Removal Permit 99-18, and Preliminary Review 98-18.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Description: The developer is proposing to construct a new drive-thru pharmacy within
an existing shopping center. The ddve-thru pharmacy is approximately 16,170 square feet in
size.
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin,q:
North - Commercial Center - Neighborhood Commercial
South - Commercial Center - Neighborhood Commercial
East Commercial Center - Neighborhood Commercial
West Commercial Center - Neighborhood Commercial
C. Parkin,q Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Building Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Size Ratio Required Provided
Pharmacy
Retail area 12,670 4.5/1000 57
Basement/Storage 3,500 1/500 7
Total 64 60 (43 on-site
17 off-site)
ITEMS G g H
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-10 & VAR 99-02 - WALGREENS
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Site Charact__eristics: The site is an existing bank with drive-thru, located on the southeast corner
of 19th Street and Carnelian Street, in a shopping center. Full street improvements exist.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The developer is proposing to demolish the existing structure and replace it with a
larger pharmacy building. The larger building proposal requires the site to provide additional
parking spaces in order to comply with City regulations. The developer is proposing to reduce
the amount of the parking spaces and existing landscaping on-site through the related Variance
99-02 application.
The Engineering Division is recommending dedication of additional right-of-way along Carnelian
Street. The purpose is to accommodate the future installation of a right turn lane for the 19th
Street intersection, relocate conflicting traffic signal poles, and upgrade handicap access ramp(s).
In addition, additional dedication is needed along 19th Street for a future bus bay. Both the dght
turn lane and the bus bay are needed to improve traffic flow at this intersection and are not the
result of project impacts; therefore, no improvements are required. The handicap access ramp
must be reconstructed to meet federal standards. A single street light is needed along the
Carnelian Street frontage.
B. Land ~: The premise of all Conditional Use Permit reviews is to ensure the
compatibility of adjacent uses and the separation of potential nuisance activities. The property
has been used for many years as a bank with drive-thru with no record of complaints. The site
is within a shopping center which was developed with neighborhood commercial uses in mind.
According to the C ty's General Plan, the neighborhood shopping centers are intended to provide
"essential retail goods and services to the residents or occupants in the immediate vicinity,"
including medical services. Typically, a neighborhood shopping center has a major supermarket
and drug store. The supermarket space is currently vacant and there is no drugstore within the
center. The location of a ddve-thru is the same as currently exists; hence should not interfere
with the surrounding land uses. Staff anticipates no land use compatibility problems as a result
of the proposed use.
C. Tree Removal: The developer is proposing to remove five mature Pine trees in order to
accommodate the construction of the pharmacy building and six additional trees, once
improvements are completed within the revised (after dedication) public right-of way. A Tree
Removal Permit has been filed in conjunction with this application, The developer will be
required to replace all trees, at a one-to-one ratio, with large specimens.
D. Desi.qn Review Committee: On June 15, and July 6, 1999, the Design Review Committee
(Henderson, Stewart and Fong, Stewart and McNiel, respectively), considered and
recommended approval, subject to revisions, of the Site Plan and Building Elevations
(Exhibit "F").
E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has
completed Part II. Staff found that there may be a significant impact related to the amount of
available on-site parking. Staff is recommending a mitigation measure that the proposed
3,500 square foot basement only be used for storage purposes in order to reduce the parking
demand for the new ddve-thru pharmacy. The conditions of approval include this restriction. If
· PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-10 & VAR 99-02 - WALGREENS
July 14, 1999
Page 3
the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration would be appropriate.
FACTS FOR FINDING: In order for the Planning Commission to approve a Variance, facts to support
all of the following findings must be made:
Landscapinq Var ance
A. Finding: That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of
the Development Code.
Fact: The literal interpretation of the landscape regulations would result in a practical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The project generally meets
landscaping regulations; however, because of the required additional street dedication, the
landscape setback along Carnelian and 19th Streets is further reduced.
B. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
Fact: The property is located within an existing shopping center and acquisition of additional
property is not possible. Furthermore, other properties in the immediate vicinity have not been
required to dedicate additional land for a bus turn bay in addition to the typical street dedication
to accommodate a right turn lane.
C. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
Fact: The literal interpretation of this regulation would deprive the property owner from
developing the property with an economically successful commercial building,
D. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
Fact: The granting of the Variance will not grant special privilege as no other property in the
immediate vicinity has been required to dedicate that much property on two sides of the property.
E. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Fact: The granting of the Vadance will not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The
project will be required to comply, except for the Variance request, with all other development
regulations including all building and fire division regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-10 & VAR 99-02 - WALGREENS
July 14, 1999
Page 4
Parkinq Variance:
A, Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of
the Development Code.
Fact: The literal interpretation of the parking regulations would result in a practical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Based on the operational
characteristics of the pharmacy, the reduction of 4 parking spaces would not adversely impact
the adjoining businesses,
B, Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district,
Fact: The pharmacy is located within an existing shopping center and acquisition of
additional property to provide the extra parking spaces is not possible.
C. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district,
Fact: The purpose of this regulation is to ensure that an adequate number of parking spaces
is provided to accommodate the use. Based on the operational characteristics of the use, the
developer would be able to operate the pharmacy use similarly to other uses within the shopping
center.
D. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
Fact: The granting of the Variance will not grant special privilege as no other property in the
immediate vicinity has a basementJstorage with similar operating characteristics.
E. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Fact: In order to ensure that the reduction in the number of parking spaces is not adversely
injurious to other properties, staff is recommending as a condition of approval and as a mitigation
measure that the basement be used only for storage at all times.
Based on the unique operational characteristics of the use and the location of the property, staff
believes the requisite findings for parking and landscaping variances can be supported.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot
radius of the project site.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-10 & VAR 99-02 - WALGREENS
July 14, 1999
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use
Permit 99-10 and Variance 99-02 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval.
City Planner
BB:SS:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Section
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 15, and July 6,
1999
Exhibit "G" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II
Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 99-10 with Conditions
Resolution of Approval for Variance 99-02
" r
....... il
, s.- $ m mf il I
L f I I ~. ; I t I f
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
9:30 p.m. Sal Salazar June 15, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-10 - EVERGREEN
DEVCO, INC. (WALGREENS) - A request to construct and operate a drive-thru pharmacy, totaling
approximately 16,170 square feet in size, in the Neighborhood Commercial District on
approximately 1.15 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Carnelian and 19th Stree{s -
APN: 202-541-060. Related file: Preliminary Review 98-18.
Desi.qn Parameters: The project involves development of approximately 1.15 acres of land with a
drive-thru pharmacy. The site is currently improved with an approximately 5,000 square foot bank
building with drive-thru teller. The developer is proposing to demolish the existing structure and
replace it with a larger pharmacy building. The pharmacy use requires the site to provide additional
parking spaces in order to comply with City regulations. Therefore, in order to accommodate the
larger pharmacy building and the additional parking spaces, the developer is proposing to reduce
the amount of the existing landscaping on-site. Of particular concern to staff is the width of the
landscape planter located on the east side of the property adjacent to the main driveway along
19th Street. The landscape planter currently screens the drive-thru lane and is proposed to screen
the future drive-thru lane for the pharmacy. The developer, however, is proposing to reduce the
width of this landscape planter from an average width of 20 feet to approximately 5 feet. The
reduction in the width of the landscape planter makes the drive-thru area more visible for passing
vehicles entering the commercial center from 19th Street. The developer is proposing to install a
screen wall in this landscape planter to screen the ddve-thru lane. However, the installation of the
screen wall (plus a 6-inch wide curb on both sides) within this narrow landscape planter further
diminishes the area available for landscaping. Because the driveway is higher than the drive-thru
lane, a screen wall may not be effective.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project:
1. Architecture: The proposed design should be revised for greater consistency with
established theme of shopping center, Elements such as greater use of tile roof, and wood
columns (instead of stucco), would be appropriate. Except for major tower, the remainder
of building should be wrapped with tile roof canopy.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Landscape Planter width on the main entry alono 19th Street: The developer is proposing
to install a 5-foot wide landscape planter on the east side of the property to screen the drive-
thru lane. Staff is recommending that width of the landscape planter be increased to a
minimum of 7 feet.
2. Screen Wall: Staff is recommending that this screen wall shall be a decorative wall (slump
stone, split face, stucco with pilasters). Additionally, staff is recommending that the screen
wall shall be relocated to the westerly section of the subject landscape planter in order to
provide more usable planting area.
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-10-EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
June 15, 1999
Page 2
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee, prior to
scheduling for Planning Commission.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Salvador M. Salazar
The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following:
1. Secondary Issues were addressed per revised plans submitted by the applicant.
2. Provide a double column configuration underthe drive-thru canopy consistent with the Other
proposed columns.
3. Enhance the pedestrian connection to the existing Center by increasing the width of the
covered arcade on the south side of the building by shifting the parking further south and
provide decorative pavement in the ddveway aisle connection.
4. Eliminate the walkway under the arcade on the west side of the building and provide
landscape planter.
5. Provide Landscape Conceptual Site Plan and cross-sections of the ultimate public
improvements of both street frontages. Landscaping needs to be designed to work as a
screen to the drive-thru lane at the time of full dght of way development.
6. Revised Plans must be submitted to staff by June 21, 1999, in order for the item to be heard
by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1999.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
9:40 p.m. Sal Salazar July 6, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-10 - EVERGREEN
DEVCO, INC. (WALGREENS) - A request to construct and operate a drive-thru pharmacy, totaling
approximately 16,170 square feet in size, in the Neighborhood Commercial District on approximately
1.15 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Carnelian and 19th Streets - APN: 202-541-
060. Related file: Preliminary Review 98-18.
Background: This project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on June 15, 1999. The
Committee members recommended the developer to modify the plan to address certain (landscaping
and pedestrian connection to the existing center) design issues. The design issues are listed below
in numerical order followed by an explanation indicating how those issues were addressed.
1. Provide a double column configuration under the drive-thru canopy consistent with the other
proposed columns.
The developer agreed to provide a double column design at the drive-thru canopy. The site
plan shows the revision.
2. Enhance the pedestrian connection to the existing center by increasing the width of the
covered arcade on the south side of the building by shifting the parking further south and
provide decorative pavement in the driveway aisle connection.
The submitted Site Plan shows this decorative connection.
3. Eliminate the walkway under the amade on the west side of the building and provide
landscape planter.
The developer was not able to completely eliminate the walkway under this elevation due to
the fact that the pharmacy is required to provide a walkway adjacent to any parking lot area.
The developer, however, moved the landscape planter adjacent to the building and included
a landscape trellis on the wall to meet the intent (provide additional landscaping) of the
comment. Staff is in support of this revision.
4. Provide Landscape Conceptual Site Plan and cross-sections of the ultimate public
improvements of both street frontages. Landscaping needs to be designed to work as a
screen to the drive-thru lane at the time of full right of way development.
The developer submitted the revised cross-sections, along Carnelian and 19th Streets, that
show the ultimate right-of-way after improvements. The developer is planting additional
trees (approximately 20 feet on center) along 19th Street In order to ensure that the drive-
thru lane is completely screened from 19th Street. Additionally, staff is recommending that
the final Landscape Plan shall also include tall shrubs (6 feet in height) adjacent to the
retaining wall.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project,
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present:Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart
sta, P,anner:Sa,vador M. Sa,azarG
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 6, 1999
Page 2
The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the following changes.
Desiqn Item No. 2: The construction material (stamped concrete) used for the pedestrian connection
and enhanced treatment at the main driveway shall be changed from stamped concrete to interlocking
pavers. The developer agreed to make this modification.
Desiqn Item No. 3: The width concrete walkway located on the west side of the building shall be
increased to approximately 4 feet. Therefore, the width of the landscape planter shall be reduced
accordingly to accommodate this modification. The developer ag reed to modify the plans accordingly.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 99-10
2. Related Files: Variance 99-02 and Preliminary Review 98-18
3. Description of Project: A request to demolish a vacant bank building and construct an
approximately 16,170 square foot (first floor and basement) drive-thru pharmacy. The
developer is also proposing to deviate from the minimum number of parking spaces
required. The site is required to provide a total of 64 parking spaces in order to
accommodate the use. The developer is proposing to provide 60 parking spaces 43 on-site
and 17 off-site (within the shopping center). Additionally, the developer is requesting
Variance approval to deviate from the minimum landscape setback along 19th Street. The
minimum landscape setback along 19th and Carnelian Streets is 25 feet (measured from
ultimate curb face) with an average of 35 feet. The developer is proposing 21 and 25 feet
of landscaping, respectively. The site is approximately 1 -acre in size and is located on the
southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 202-541-60.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Evergreen Devco, Inc.
1300 E. Missouri, Suite A 200
Phoenix, AZ 85014
5. General Plan Designation:
Neighborhood Commercial
6. Zoning:
Neighborhood Commercial
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The property is surrounded by developed land with
similar commercial buildings and zoning designation.
8o Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Salvador M. Salazar, AICP
Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
None
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS
Page ~
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact, as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
( ) Land Use and Plai-.-~;i~g (X) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biologicel Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
( ) Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this Case because all potentially significant effects
1) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed: ~
S IVl. Salazar, AICP
Associate Planner
June 21, 1999
· Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
S~gni~cant
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.'
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) (X)
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? 0 (X)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) (X)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-d) No impacts are anticipated to Land Use and Planning as the drive-thru pharmacy
use is permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial Development District.
2. POPU~TION ~D HOUSING. Would ~e proposah
a) Cumulmively exceed official regional or Io~1
population proje~ions? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial gro~h in an area either
dire~ly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or e~ension of major
infrastructure)? ( ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Page 4
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ) ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ) ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ) ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ) ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ) ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ) (X)
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) 0 (X)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-i) The nearest fault zone is the Cucamonga Fault which is located approximately
2.5 miles northeast of the subject site. No fault rupture is expected in the
immediate vicinity of the project. Therefore, some exposure to seismic related
hazard is expected. This exposure is not considered significant because the
exposure is no different than the exposure of virtually all new and existing
development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) 0 ( ) (X)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hRTRrds such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
-Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Pa~le 5
Issuss and Supporting Information Sources: SignificantMitigationSilgr~nt
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) (X)
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) (X)
d) Creme objectionable odors? ( ) (X)
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) 0 ( ) (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) (X) 0 ( )
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
-Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Page
Significant
Impact Less
Issues and Supl)offing I~on~atlon Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than
SignificantMitigation nt ~No
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) (.) (X)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
d) The applicant is requesting variance approval to deviate from the minimum number of
parking spaces required for the use. As a mitigation measure and to ensure that there
is adequate parking for the adjoining uses, the proposed basement of the building
is to be used only for storage at all times.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ) ( ) ) (X)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ) (X)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-e) In general, wildlife diversity in the area where the project is to be located is low due
to the urbanized nature of the areas and its surroundings. Therefore, endangered
species are not expected to occur in the area due to the lack of suitable habitat.
Additionally, the site currently has improvements (5,000 square foot building), which
are not conducive to wildlife habitat.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Page 7
Significant
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposah
a) Conflict with adopted energy consedation
plans? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availabiliW of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) (X)
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
'b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( (X)
10. NOISE. Will the prop~al result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
-Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Page
Significant
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic ) ( ) (X)
effect?
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X)
-Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS PaSte 9
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposak
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b) No impacts to recreation are anticipated as the project is a commercial building.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restdct the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
-Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-10 - WALGREENS Pa,qe 10
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ( (X)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all
that apply):
(X) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981 )
(X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
MITIGATION MEASURES
Item 6. Transportation (parking):
1) In order to reduce the parking demand for the new drive-thru pharmacy the
proposed 3,500 square foot basement shall only be used for storage purposes.
Gent Oy: EVERGREEN DEVCO INC 6022639338; 00/22/99 12:01PM;.le. ras_#765;Page 2/2
9.ENT Ily: R CLJC;AIBI~NI~4, COM DEV; 6-22-99 8:otl; 9094?72847 --> l!0226-qo~Lqe; #1211~
Initial Study for
,CUP 99-10 - WALGREEN,S City of Rancho Cucirnonge
Pa;la 1 I
AIIPLICANT CERTIFICAllON
I certify mat I a&m the applicant for the pmje~ ,~escrllied in Ibis Initial Shady. I a4~knowledge that I
have ineld this Initial StUdy and the proposed mitigation manures, Further, I have revir, ed the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mirig~te the effects to a pint where olearly no signffianl environmental effecls wogla
ocr,,ur.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The fo~owing Negative Declaration is being circulated for pubtic review in accordance with the
California Environmental Qua~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Pubtic Resources Code.
Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-10 Public Review Period Closes: July 14. 1999
Project Name: Walgreens Project Applicant: Evergreen Devco, Inc.
Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the southeast corner of Carnelian and 19th
Streets - APN: 202-541-060.
Project Description: A request to construct and operate a drive-thru pharmacy, totaling approximately
16,170 square feet in size. in the Neighborhood Commercial District on approximately 1.15 acres of land.
Related files: Variance 99-02 and Preliminary Review 98-18.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are Included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
July 14, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 99-10 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
A 16,170 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY ON 1.15 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-541-60.
A. Recitals.
1. Evergreen Devco, Inc. has filed an application forthe issuance of Conditional Use Permit
No. 99-10, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as '~he application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng on July 14, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Carnelian and
19th Streets with a street frontage of 169.35 feet and a lot depth of 241 feet, and is presently
improved with a 5,000 square foot bank building with drive-thru; and
b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are improved with a
commercial center, the properties to the south and east consist of a shopping center; and
c. The project, with the exception of parking and landscaping complies with all
minimum development City standards; and
d. The proposed design incorporates many architectural and landscape design
elements consistent with the Development Code objectives to provide compatible building
elevations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considedng the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Plannin.q Division
1 ) The developer shall provide additional shrubs on the north side of the
retaining wall along 19th Street.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
2) All roof- and ground-mounted equipment shall be fully screened from
surrounding property and public rights-of-way. This may require
increased-parapet height given the natural climb in local terrain to the
north.
3) No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted, including
temporary storage in staging area on south side of building. The
garden canter is not considered outdoor storage so long as the above
noted enhancements are provided.
4) All building materials and colors shall match the existing center.
5) Tree Removal Permit No. 99-17 is approved subject to replacement of
trees at a one-to-one ratio. All removed trees shall be replaced at a
one-to-one ratio with the largest nursery grown stock available as
determined by the City Planner.
6) All signs shall be designed to conform to the shopping centers Uniform
Sign Program.
Enfiineedn.q Division
1) The developer is required to procass a Certificate of Compliance
(No. 445) for a lot line adjustment between APNs: 202-541-58 and 60.
The lot line adjustment shall be recorded, prior to issuance of a
building permit.
2) Dedicate additional street right-of-way along Carnelian Street frontage
sufficient so that the City can, in the future, install right turn lane for the
19th Street intersection (per Standard Plan No. 119), relocate
conflicting traffic signal poles and upgrade access ramp(s). Provide a
minimum right-of-way of 7 feet measured from the ultimate face of curb
and a corner cut-off for a 35-foot curb return, per Standard Plan No's.
100-b and 102. This offer of dedication shall be made and approved,
prior to the approval of Lot Line Adjustment No. 445 and the issuance
of building permits.
3) Dedicate additional street right-of-way along 19th Street for a future
bus bay (per Standard Plan No. 119). Provide a minimum of 7 feet
measured from the ultimate faca of curb. Said fight-of-way shall
extend to the existing project driveway in the event future development
within the center warrants a right turn lane into the canter. These
offere of dedication shall be made and approved, prior to the approval
of Lot Line adjustment No. 445 and the issuanca of building permits.
4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical,
except for the 66kV electrical) on the project side of Carnelian Street
shall be under grounded from the first pole north of 19th Street to the
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 1,4, 1999
Page 4
first pole south of the projecrs south property line, prior to public
improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All
services crossing Carnelian Street within the project under grounding
limits shall be undergrounded at the same time.
5) A signed consent and waiver to join the appropriate landscape and
lighting maintenance districts shall be filed with the City Engineer, prior
to the issuance of building permits.
6) Improvements exist at the southeast comer of Carnelian and
19th Streets, but some do not meet current standards since the center
was constructed, prior to City incorporation. To meet the Federal
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design and construction
requirements for accessibility, the centers northerly drive approach on
Carnelian Street shall be reconstructed per Standard Plan No. 101,
Type C. If necessary, a sidewalk easement shall be dedicated as
required and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7) Install 16000 lumen HPSV street light along the Carnelian Street
frontage of the project parcel. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid
to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street
lights for the first six months of operation, pdor to building permit
issuance.
8) If additional street trees are necessary, they shall conform to the
"Conditional Use Permit 99-10 Street Tree Requirement Form," dated
May 18, 1999, on file in the office of the City Engineer.
9) Public right-of-way improvements adjacent to and fronting the project
site shall be protected in-place and replaced as required above to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer as follows:
a) Security shall be posted and an agreement executed, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing
completion of the required improvements, pdor to the issuance
of building permits.
b) Provide Street Improvement Plans, prepared by a reg stered Civil
engineer, for the required off-site public improvements.
Processing and plan check fees will be required,
c) Prior to any work being performed in the street r ght-of-way, fees
shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the
office of the City Engineer.
-PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
1) In order to reduce the parking demand for the new ddve-thru
pharmacy, the proposed 3,500 square foot basement shall only be
used for storage purposes.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'I'rEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-10
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that deparlment.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucemonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Conditional Use Permit 99-10
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit 99-10
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT: Wa preens Pharmacy
LOCATION: Southeast corner Carnelian and 19th Streets
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City. its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of.approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the
date of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which /
include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein. and
the Development Code regulations.
project No CUP99-10
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approvat shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code
and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development /
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of
building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of
shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, /
and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall /
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrate or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in
underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, __/__ __
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
D. Shopping Centers
1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the
City Planner:
a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). /
b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and /
to include self-closing pedestrian doors.
Project No. CUP99-10
Completion Date
c. Roll-up doors. /
d. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. /
e. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure an< /
designed to be hidden from view.
2. Trash collection shall not interfere with normal business hours of operation. /
3. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. /
4. The entire site shall be kept tree trom trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash /
and debris remain for more than 24 hours.
5. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking
only."
6. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards
which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants:
a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed
an exterior noise level of 60 dB dudng the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB
during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m.
b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening,
closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage
cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless
otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to
a residential area.
7. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and
plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any
combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
8. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend
into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
9. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of
shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission.
The shopping cads shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end
of each work day.
E. Building Design
1. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main /
building colors.
F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space __/i i
abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum
of 11 feet wide.
ProiectNo CUP99-10
Completion Date
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall __
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, ~/__
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. Handicap accessible stalls shah be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or ~ ~/__
more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total
number of stalls for use by the handicapped.
5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commemial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking
at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square
feet.
6. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily __ __/__
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the
required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater.
After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are
2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall
provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking
spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike reck. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking
spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number
shall be rounded off to the higher whole number.
G. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home
landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed
landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance
of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier __/__
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading
plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for
transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow
all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming
methods.
3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within /
commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.
4, Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three /
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of __/__ __
one tree per 30 linear feet of building.
6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than__/__ __
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erasion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
Project No CUP99-10
Completion Date
7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or
greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their
appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area,
1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover.
in addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall
also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and
shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting
required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the
developer prior to occupancy.
8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
9. All walls (including screen walls) shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in
public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
H. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a pad of this
approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance
and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to
installation of any signs.
I. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost
of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be
required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City
Planner in the amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing
satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be
used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on
the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved
environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fo~eit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),
the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner
prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual
qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
J. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
Project No. CUP99-10
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
I OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall /
be marked with the project file number (i .e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code,
National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the
Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable
handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition /
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such
fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division
prior to permit issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recerdation /
and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
Existing Structures
1. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the /
Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code.
2. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for /
building permit application.
3. Existing building shall be demolished upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, __
additional requirements may be required.
M. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building __
permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
X Per Rancho Cucemonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __ __/__
Project No CUP99-10
Completion Date
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as
woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled
stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate
for proposed operations.
2. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion /
of sprinkler system.
3. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase /
shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for
specific details and ordering information.
4. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems,
alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
5. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, /
UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
O. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle
power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,
with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the
entire development,
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.
P. Security Hardware
1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are
within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall
be used.
2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal
gates, or alarmed.
Q. Windows
1. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. /
Project No. CUP99-10
Completion Date
R. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for
nighttime visibility.
2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall
be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to
background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department.
S. Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and
in turn save dollars and lives.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 99-02 TO DEVIATE FROM THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING
SPACES AND TO REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK ALONG
CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 202-541-60.
A. Recitals.
1. Evergreen Devco, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. 99-02
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance
request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14 day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolutio_______~n.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission durin9 the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Camelian and
19th Streets with a street frontage of 169.35 feet and feet and lot depth of 241 feet and is presently
improved with a 5,000 square foot building; and
b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are improved with a
commercial center, the properties to the south and east consist of a shopping center; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. Finding: That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physicel hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of the Development Code.
Fact: The literal interpretation of the landscape regulations would result in a
practical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The project generally
meets landscaping regulations; however, because of the required additional street dedication, the
landscape setback along Carnelian and 19th Streets is further reduced.
· PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 99-02 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
b. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same district.
Fact: The property is located within an existing shopping center and
acquisition of additional property is not possible. Furthermore, other properties in the immediate
vicinity have not been required to dedicate additional land for a bus turn bay in addition to the typical
street dedication to accommodate a right turn lane.
c. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
same district.
Fact: The literal interpretation of this regulation would deprive the property
owner from developing the property with an economically successful commercial building..
d. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
Fact: The granting of the Variance will not grant special privilege as no other
property in the immediate vicinity has been required to dedicate that much property on two sides
of the property.
e. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Fact: The granting of the Vadance will not be injurious to other properties in
the vicinity. The project will be required to comply, except for the Vadance request, with all other
development regulations including all building and fire division regulations.
Parkin,q:
a. Finding: That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of the Development Code.
Fact: The literal interpretation of the parking regulations would result in a
practical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Based on the
operational characteristics of the pharmacy, the reduction of 4 parking spaces would not adversely
impact the adjoining businesses,
b. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same district,
Fact: The pharmacy is located within an existing shopping center and
acquisition of additional property to provide the extra parking spaces is not possible.
c. Finding: That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 99-02 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
Fact: The purpose of this regulation is to ensure that an adequate number of
parking spaces is provided to accommodate the use. Based on the operational characteristics of
the use, the developer would be able to operate the pharmacy use similarly to other uses within the
shopping center.
d. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
Fact: The granting of the Variance will not grant special privilege as no other
property in the immediate vicinity has a basementJstorage with similar operating characteristics.
e. Finding: That the granting of the Vadance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Fact: In order to ensure that the reduction in the number of parking spaces
is not adversely injurious to other properties, staff is recommending as a condition of approval and
as a mitigation measure that the basement be used only for storage at all times.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below.
1) All pertinent conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval for
Conditional Use Permit 99-10 shall apply.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A
proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium purposes; along
with Design Review of 306 apartment units, on 16 acres of land located within the
Terra Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue,
Church Street, and East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre). Proposed
development density is within the Medium-High Residential density (14-24 dwelling
units per acre). APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: The proposed project density is 19.36 dwellin9 units per acre. The project is
located within the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre); however, the
proposed development is within the Medium-High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units
per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista
Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council.
The standards of the Medium-High Distdct will apply to the proposed development.
B. Surroundin,q Land Use and Zoning: The proposed project is located in the southwest
quadrant of the Terra Vista Community, existing residential and commercial development is
predominant throughout much of this quadrant. Land Use and Zoning surrounding the site
include:
North - Spruce Avenue Park and an existing apartment community
South- An undeveloped parcel currently zoned High Residential, andTownCenterSquare
East - An undeveloped parcel currently zoned Medium-High Residential
West - Terra Vista Business Park and an undeveloped parcel currently zoned High
Residential
C. General Plan Desi,qnations:
Project Site - High Residential (24-30dwelling units per acre); developed within the Medium-
High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) as allowed by the Terra
Vista Community Plan
North - Park/Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
South - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre)/Community Commercial
East Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)
West Office Park/High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre)
]~TgN T
.PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Site Characteristics: The site was previously rough graded for Tract 13859, an apartment
project; and all perimeter streets, East Elm Avenue, Spruce Street, and Church Street, are
existing. There are no remaining trees or significant vegetation on the site.
E. Parkin.q Calculations:
Parking Required:
One Bedroom Units - 1.5 spaces/unit X 58 units = 87 spaces (one enclosed space/unit)
Two Bedroom Units - 1.8 spaces/unit X 224 units = 403 spaces (one enclosed space/unit)
Three Bedroom units - 2.0 spaces/unit X 24 units = 48 spaces (two enclosed spaces/unit)
In addition, to the number of spaces required for each unit, one parking space for every four
units is required for visitor parking: 306 units × 0.25 = 77 spaces
Therefore the total number of spaces required is 615. Of this total, a minimum of 330 spaces
must be enclosed within a garage or carport.
Parking Provided:
Enclosed: 357 Open: 259 Total: 616Spaces
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has indicated that Innsbruck Village has been designed with the
following prospective residents in mind: small families with older children, "empty nesters,"
older singles, and young professionals. The applicant has also indicated that this project is
designed for those individuals who are renters by choice. The basic amenities within the
project include upgraded wiring for phone/modem/fax usage, both attached and detached
garages, clubhouse and outdoor activity centers including an outdoor fireplace, fitness center,
pool/spa, and a tot lot. The project is completely fenced, including secudty gates at the project
entry from both Spruce Avenue and Church Street. Pedestrian access gates are provided at
the primary entry points as well as near all three intersections surrounding the site for
pedestrian access to nearby schools, parks, and shopping opportunities.
The project includes a total of 306 units, consisting of 58 one-bedroom, 224 two-bedroom, and
24 three-bedroom units. The unit square footage ranges from 789 square feet to 1,201
square feet. Units are arranged in four building types containing from 4 to 18 units per
building, arranged in both two and three story structures. Enclosed garages are provided for
each unit, and in some cases the garage is accessible directly from the unit.
B. Desifin Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (consisting of McNiel, Stewart
and Henderson) reviewed the project on June 15, 1999, and recommended approval subject
to minor modifications. The Design Review Committee recommendations have been
incorporated as conditions of approval. (See Exhibit "G")
C. Technical Review/Gradinq Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the
project on June 14, 1999. All requirements of the committee are included as conditions of
approval. There were no outstanding or extraordinary issues addressed by the committee.
J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
The Grading Committee reviewed the project on June 15, 1999, and recommended approval
subject to minor modifications. The following Grading Committee Comments have been
incorporated as conditions of approval:
1. The concrete drainage behind Building 2/3 shall be moved to one side of the drive aisle,
rather than be directed to the middle.
2. Section A-A, along East Elm Street, extend the low retaining wall along the toe of slope
to keep irrigation run-off from draining on the walkway.
3. Section B-B, eliminate the curvilinear nature of the on-site walkway which causes the
use of retaining walls along the street frontage.
D. Environmental Assessment: The Environmental Checklist Form Initial Study Part II has been
prepared for the project. In addition a Noise Impact Study and Traffic Signal Warrants
Analysis have been prepared. Mitigation is included in the attached resolution for air quality,
traffic and noise impacts.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend issuance of a
Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Tentative Tract 16000
and Design Review 99-13 subject to all conditions of approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E' - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "G" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "H" - Fence and Wall Plan
Exhibit "1" - Design Review Committee Minutes
Exhibit "J" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution Recommending Approval of Tentative Tract 16000
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Review 99-13
TENTATIVE TRACT 16000
I I '
USE PERMIT NO:
__ IN lNl: CITy [IF F~ANCHT]
SAN BERNARD|N[], B]rAT[: 0f~I~AL|FORNIA
SITE PLAN
~.Ewas ^~'An'r..~'r coM.u~,'r~.s TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~:~:.~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
\ COMMUNITY AMENITY LEGE]~p
ENTRY ELEVATION :
ELEVATION ·
' ~ CHURCH
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
Lewis Apartment Communities TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 North Mountain Avenue ~ ~='~'_'~-~
Upland, California 9178~ SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
· 14~t. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
FIREPLACE W/ARBOR {ELEVATION)
LEASING OFFICE COURTYARD & SPA AREA W/
[RONT LOADING PLAN SIDE LOADING PLAN
VIEW VIEW
BB~ NODES .., TMSH ENCLOSU~ ,,,
DETAILED ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apartment CommunitiesTERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
{,56 ~o~h Mo..t,i.
Upland. California91786SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
~J'/-,'/~/7'~'''''~'' 'd-; '""'"°~*°'~"
CORNERENLARGEMENT~ CHURCHST.&SPRUCEAVE.
MAIN RECREATION AREA ....... ~ ~ .. ] CORNER ENLARGEMENT ~ ELM AVE. & SPRUCE AVE.
TYPICAL PARKING LOT SCREENING
(SECTION)
DETAILED ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apartment Communities TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland. California 91786 SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
TOT LOT
TOT LOT ENLARGEMENTS
Lewis Apartment Communities TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, California 91786 SITE 'A' - T. T. 16000
(909) 985..0971
" TENTATIVE TRACT 16000
~ iN THE CI~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
, ,,, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR01NO, 5TAT[ OF CALIIrORNL~
:'r' .', I
FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION
Elevmtlon Legend:
Roof Material: Concrete "S" Tile _
4:12 Pitch Typical ROOF pLAN (l/t6, e i.,0,,)
Wall Material: (Light Sand Finish) ~ ~
2x 8 Wood Paint Fascia (3 r' ~6
Wood Sections Garage Door
Tfim: Stucco Over Foam BUILDING TYPE 1
Accenls: Wrought Iron 4x8
c,.y~,.i,@o.b,~ ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA
/
e. ". ~'
0 0 O
,-
REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
· ^.~.,~:~.o.~.,,~..~o.,,~. BUILDING TYPE 2
c,.yD~,~G.b,c ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA
- ~ff/~/~ ~-/~
SIDE ELEVATION
· '..-," ",.'-~'., ,,... .,-.,....L,-,BUILDING TYPE 3
"~"*'"" ...." ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
LEw,S.',I',,.T~.,E~TCOMMU.,T,~s TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
FRON' ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION
[-I
"'~'~'.""";~"" BUILDING TYPE 4
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
,.'!,,',S,,,'.,.','~,ENTCOM~tUr~,,',EsTERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
P, ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
~//~ ~- 3 '
RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION I-Elrr ELEVATION
^"""":""""~""""~'~"""""~"' RECREATION BUILDING
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
II!WISAI'ARTMI.~NTCf)MMUNITII-ZS TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RIGHT E'LEVATION ............................... ~'}ltf~iJq~klt~ ~ ~4~;~
FRONT ELEVATION
~ ....... .':.7 .......".7.,~-'~,-.' 7:-.~ . , - ~
REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION
,1~];
· ^~,..,,~:~v.,,.~,.,,.,,..,,~,,.,,,,,,k¢.LEASING BUILDING "L~ ~'~' '
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN ~-. ...... '
,.E~,~ ~,'~R','~E.'~O~,T,~ TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA
~~/~ '~- ~' .....
FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
""' ~ ...."'"' GARAGE BUILDING
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS
LE**VIS APARI~IENT CO/~tI~IUNI]'IES TER RA VISTA APARTM E NTS
[]
Plan
f
_r'~ ......."-
0 , Plan D hl~ny alve /
Plan C
FLOOR PLANS A, B, C, AND D
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONG~ CALIFORNIA
[]
O O I
Plan F(2~ft~onl~
FLOOR PLANS E AND F
~ewts~p~g~n.~co~u.a~a~s TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~.~.:~.:~
RANCHO CVCAMONG~ CALIFORNIA
I
I
0 [] 0
SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
BUILDING TYPE 1 - COMPOSITES
TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA
THIRD FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
sc^t~ ~r = ~'-~ OUIL. p!N~ T~t~_P~.S~UMM~By .
BUILDING TYPE 2
SECOND FLOOR -J COMPOSITES
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUN1TIES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~,~..~
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA
~ :~ BUILDING TYPE 3
L ..... ' COMPOSITES
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIYORNIA
SECOND FLOOR
,c^L~ .,-. v~- FIRST FLOOR
~c^L~ ,~-. ,..,-
BUILDING TYPE SUMMARY:
BUILDING TYPE 4 - COMPOSITES
~-EW,SAP^.TMEnTCO.MUN,.iES TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
F
RECREATION BULIDING FLOOR PLAN
t~w,s^,.,,R,.s.,couMuN,,,ss TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS OE~::::~
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA
13
D
Reccptlon- j LeeslaI
LEASING BULIDING FLOOR PLAN
LEWSS ^P^RTMENT CO~fMUN~TXEST~RRA VISTA APARTMENTS ~;~..~
/-, '- -. .,.,,~,
~ II LOT 1
FENTATIVE TRACT 16000
--~_~
__ _ f ...............
CHURCH 'ST~ET.
FENCE & WALL PLAN
Lewis Apartment Communities TERRA VISTA APARTMENTS
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upbnd, CaliforniaglTS6 SITE 'A'- T. T. 16000
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Dan Coleman/Debra Meier June 15, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99-13 -
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for
condominium purposes; along with Design Review of 306 apartment units, located within the Terra
Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation is High Residential
(24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development density is within the Medium High
Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077-421-39.
Back.qround: Tentative Tract 16000 is located in the southwesterly quadrant of the Terra Vista
Planned Community, existing residential and commercial development is predominant throughout
much of this quadrant. Immediately north of Tentative Tract16000 is Spruce Avenue Park and
existing apartments (Tract 12673); lying southerly of Tentative Tract16000 is a portion of an
undeveloped parcel currently zoned High Residential and the Town Center Square; lying easterly
of Tentative Tract16000 is an undeveloped parcel designated Medium High Residential; and finally
located westerly of Tentative Tract1600 is the existing Terra Vista Business Park.
This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the Terra Vista
Community Plan. The proposed net density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range
of Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the Terra
Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City
Council. The standards of the Medium High Residential District will apply to the proposed
development.
Summary of the proposed Innsbruck Villaqe:
The applicant has indicated that I nnsbruck Village has been designed with the following prospective
residents in mind: small families with older children, "empty nesters," older singles, and young
professionals. The applicant has also indicated that this project is designed for those individuals
who are renters by choice. The basic amenities within the project include upgraded wiring for
phone/modern/fax usage, both attached and detached garages will be available, clubhouse and
outdoor activity centers including an outdoor fireplace, fitness center, pool/spa, and tot lots.
Issues for Discussion and Consideration:
Perimeter Site Issues
1, Reduce perimeter wall heights to 6-feet maximum, pilasters may remain at 7-feet 8-inches
(refer to page 2 of the Development Plan package).
2. Provide a minimum of 5-feet of landscaping between the public sidewalk and the perimeter
wrought iron fence, particularly at the comer of East Elm and Spruce Avenues (refer to
pages 2 and 2c of the Development Plan package).
3. Gated pedestrian access points have been provided near each of three perimeter
intersections for pedestrian access to surrounding parks and schools - Spruce Avenue Park
and Ruth Musser Middle School located on Spruce Street northerly of East Elm Avenue; La
Mission Park (yet to be developed) is located on Church Street eastedy of Spruce Avenue;
and Coyote Canyon School is located on East Elm Avenue easterly of Spruce Avenue.
EXHIBIT I
DRC COMMENTS
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 2
Consider whether the proposed gated pedestrian entries provided at each intersection
provide adequate and convenient access to the perimeter of the project, particularly for
school age children.
Interior Site Desi.qn Issues
1. The project proposes 306 dwelling units which requires 10 recreational amenities per
Development Code Section 17.08.040.H. The plan currently includes the following
amenities: Recreation Building (1), pool/spa (1), outdoor entertainment area and media
center located at the Leasing Pavilion (1), spa/courtyard (1), three large open lawn areas
(3), BBQ Nodes throughout the project (2) = 9 TOTAL amenities.
The project currently includes only one tot lot, which does not comply with the requirement
for "multiple enclosed tot lots." Therefore, no credit has been counted for this amenity, A
project of this size would typically include at least three tot lots. Staff recommends the
addition of two tot lots, and consequently an additional point for this amenity can be included
to increase the amenity package to 10.
2. Increase driveway width at entry to Leasing Office to 26-feet. The adjoining planter finger
must be 6-feet minimum width (outside dimension).
3, Shift location of two trash enclosures to be adjacent to garage buildings (refer to page 1 of
the Development Plan package). In addition, the separation between curbs/sidewalks and
trash enclosures should be 5~foot minimum to allow for appropriate landscape area. The
walkway width between the trash enclosure located near Building 3/3 is not adequate for a
5-foot sidewalk.
4. Whenever planter islands or fingers are used the minimum outside dimension must be 6-
feet (refer to page 1 of the Development Plan package).
5. Use decorative PCC in front of garages (refer to page 2 of the Development Plan package).
6. Potential locations for two additional tot lots should be considered (consider one tot lot near
north end of Building 2/2, and at the north end between Buildings 3/2 and 2/8, refer to page
2 of the Development package).
7. Consider additional walkways around buildings 2/1 and 2/4 for convenience of residents
wanting access to pool/spa/courtyard areas on-site. In addition, consider moving the
walkway at the south end of Building 2/3 to access the parking lot (refer to page 2 of the
Development Plan package).
8. A 5-foot minimum landscape separation shall be provided between buildings, walkways,
garages. and trash enclosures (refer to page 2 and 2c of the Development Plan package).
Areas of concern will be highlighted at the Design Review Committee meeting.
Architectural Issues
1. Vary the patterns of the garage doors in pairs (refer to the elevations of the various Building
Types).
DRC COMMENTS
T]'16000 & DR 99-13-LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 3
2. Add decorative architectural elements such as cornice details, window sills/trim, etc.
3. A Noise Impact Study, prepared for Tentative Tract16000 by LSA Associates, has identified
Mitigation Measures, which are required to mitigate noise generated by traffic on perimeter
streets. The applicants will be required to accomplish the following:
a. Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) is required for apartment units,
which would be exposed to potential traffic noise levels between 60 and 65 dBA Ldn.
All buildings facing the project perimeter would be subject to this mitigation measure.
b. In addition to the mechanical ventilation system, those buildings facing Church
Street may be subject to noise levels exceeding 65 dBA Ldn and will be required to
include double-panned windows and weatheretdpping seals for additional noise
mitigation.
c. A 5-foot high sound barrier is recommended for second floor balconies of all
apartment units located within the 60 dBA Ldn noise contour. This mitigation
measure would apply to second floor balconies of all units facing the perimeter of the
project. Discuss with the applicant the vadous options available to accomplish this
mitigation measure, including increased wall heights and the use of plexi-glass.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval subject to revised plans returning on Consent Calendar, prior to
scheduling for Planning Commission.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Debra Meier
Committee discussion followed the outline of issues as identified in the staff report, therefore action
comments will relate directly to the items listed above. The Committee recommended that the
appropriate modifications be made in cooperation with staff and that the project be forwarded to
Planning Commission.
Perimeter Site Issues
1. VVhere perimeter walls are proposed, the Committee suggested that the applicant increase
berming against the wall to limit the exposed wall height to 6 feet.
2. At the corner of East Elm Avenue and Spruce Street, the Committee recommended that
staff work with the applicant to maximize the width of landscaping between sidewalk and
wall. Verify that the plan reflects the standard sidewalk comer cutoff (as required by
Engineering Department) the area of concrete at the corner seems excessive.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 16000 & DR 99-13 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
June 15, 1999
Page 4
3. The gated pedestrian access points to the perimeter of the project are adequate as
proposed by the applicant.
Interior Site Desiqn Issues
1. In order to increase the total number of recreational amenities required by the Development
Code, the applicant proposed to provide one expanded size tot lot, rather than scattered
smaller tot lots. The Committee concurred with the proposal and directed the applicant to
work with staff to modify the tot lot area to approximately 40 feet by 60 feet in area (an oval
configuration was suggested). This expanded tot lot will result in increasing the amenity
count to 10, as required.
2. The driveway width at the entry to the leasing office will be expanded to 26 feet.
3. Two trash enclosures will be shifted to be adjacent to garage buildings as suggested by
staff. The applicant agreed to be careful not to create small areas that could not be
appropriately landscaped due to inadequate space, retaining wall or building footings
interfering with landscaping and similar constraints that occur within very small areas.
4. All landscaped planter islands must be 6 feet outside dimension as required by
Development Code standards.
5. The applicant agreed to the use of decorative concrete in front of garage doom. In addition,
the Committee recommended that the dimension in front of garage doom must be either less
than 8 feet, or greater than 18 feet, to control vehicle parking in front of garage doors unless
appropriate space is available.
6. In reference to the tot lot location, refer to item #1 above.
7. Additional walkways will be carried around the ends of Buildings 2/1 and 2/4.
8. As previously noted, the applicant agreed to be careful not to create small areas that could
not be appropriately landscaped due to jnadequate space, retaining wall or building footings
interfering with landscaping and similar constraints that occur within very small areas.
Architectural Issues
1. Garage door patterns must vary in pairs, including color and gird pattern.
2. The Committee found the apartment buildings to be acceptable in style, color, detail, and
design. The Committee, however did recommend that the leasing office and recreation
building needed additional architectural detailing, and that the two buildings should contain
complimentary design elements and features. The applicant was requested to work with
staff to provide the revised plans.
3. The applicant will provide a detail of how the use of plexiglass can be incorporated into the
design of the balcony wall and railing details in order to comply with mitigation of the Noise
Study.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
t. Project File: Tentative Tract 16000 and Design Review 99-13
2. Related Files:
3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT 16000 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99-13 -
LEWIS APARTMENT COM MUN ITI ES - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots
for condominium purposes; along with Design Review of 306 apartment units, located within
the Terra Vista Planned Community. The site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue,
Church Street, and East Elm Avenue. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development
density is within the Medium High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) -
APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
David Lewis, Managing Director
Lewis Apartment Communities
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland CA 91786
5. General Plan Designation: High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the
Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP)
6. Zoning: This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the
TVCP. The proposed net density is 19.36 dwelling units per acre which is in the range of
Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the
TVCP subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council.
The standards of the Medium High Residential district will apply to the proposed
development.
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 16000 is located in the
southwesterly quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community. Existing residential and
commercial development surround much ofthis quadrant. Immediately north of Tentative
Tract 16000 is Spruce Avenue Park and existing apartments (Tract 12673); lying southerly
of Tentative Tract 16000 is a portion of an undeveloped parcel currently zoned High
Residential and the Town Center Square; to the east is an undeveloped parcel designated
Medium High Residential; and finally located westerly of Tentative Tract 1600 is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Dan Coleman, Planning Division (909) 477-2750
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
(x) Land Use and Planning (X) Transportation/Circulation (X) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biologicel Resources (X) Utilities and Service Systems
(X) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (X) Aesthetics
(X) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
(X) Air Quality (X) Noise (X) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that eadier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed:
/Debra Meier, AICP
Contract Planner
June 22, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated." and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurjsdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) 8e incompatible with existing land use jn the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Oisrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a) This parcel is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) in the
Terra Vista Community Plan; however, the proposed net density of Tentative Tract
16000 is 19.36 dwelling units per acre, which is jn the range of Medium High
Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre). This type of density adjustment is
permitted by the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval by the
Planning Commission and the City Council. As a result, this project will also require
action by the City Council, as well as the Planning Commission.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 4
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ( ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ( ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) (X) ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
f) The topography of the site will be modified by grading and construction. The impact
of grading will have minimal impact on the surrounding area due to the fact that all
perimeter streets and infrastructure are already existing. The Tujunga-Delhi
association is of relatively loose texture which can result in wind erosion. On-site
grading will be performed under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer. The
resulting impact will not be significant.
g) The General Plan (Figure V-2) indicates that the site located within the Tujunga-
Delhi soil association. The TujungaoDelhi association may also have soil bearing
capabilities that could limit some development. Structures proposed on this soil type
are permitted only after a site specific soils investigation has been performed that
indicates that the soils can adequately support the weight of the proposed structure.
Standard Conditions of Approval will require a site specific soils report for review by
the Building and Safety Division, pdor to the issuance of building permits. The
resulting impact will not be significant·
· s
Is~es aN sup~x~o Info~at~ s~,~es: . M~
4. WATER. ~// the pmposa/ msu/t in;
a) Changes in abso~tion rates, drainage pa~ems,
or the rate and amount of su~a~ water runo~ ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 5
b) Exposure of people or pmpe~y to water related
h~ards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into su~a~ water or other alteration
of suffa~ water quali~ (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or tuffiidi~)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Changes in the amount of su~a~ water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Changes in cuffents, or the coume or direrion
d water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
q Change in the quanti~ d ground watem, either
through dim~ additions or withdrawals, or
through inter~ption of an aquifer by cuts or
ex~vations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge ~pabili~? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Altered dim~ion or rote of flow of gmundwate~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Impa~s to groundwater quailS? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Substantial redu~ion in the amount of
groundwater othe~ise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Commen~:
a) The abso~tion rate will be altered bemuse of the paving and hard scape proposed.
All ranoff will be conveyed to existing drainage facilities which have been designed
to handle the flows. ~e impa~ is not considered significant.
b) There are no special flood h~ard areas within or near the proje~ site. NO IMPACT.
e) The proje~ will not alter the course or direrion of water movement. Su~a~ ranoff
cu~ently reaching the site froram off-site areas will be conveyed to existing drainage
facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. NO IMPACT.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 6
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The short term and long term air quality impacts were addressed in the certified EIR
for the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, construction of a project of this
size will exceed SCAQM D thresholds dudng grading activities for PM~0 and NOx, and
may also exceed SCAQM D thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts)
for NOx. The proposed project represents only a fraction of the total emissions of
NOx in the County, therefore this impact is less than significant. The following
mitigation measures will be required to reduce short term construction
impacts to a less-than significant level:
'1) TheConstructionContractorshallselecttheconstructionequipmentused
onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The
Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) TheConstructionContractorshallensurethatconstructiongradingplans
include a ststsment that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended; thereby, decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
S) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and
kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation
of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each
day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust
from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 7
such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the
day, and whenever wind exceeds '15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of
the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractorshall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated
natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and
coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as
high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating
applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag
or sponge.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle tdps or traffic congestion? (X) ( ) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( (X)
e) Hazards or barders for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The project will generate additional tdps due to the new construction of 306
apartment units. However, the project will not increase vehicle trips or traffic
L
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 8
congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use for which street widths
were evaluated at a build-out condition. Traffic impacts were addressed in the
certified EIR prepared for the Terra Vista Planned Community. In addition, the
project proponent was required to prepare a signal warrant study for the intersection
of Church Street and West Elm Avenue. The project proponent will be required
to:
1) Pay transportation development fees prior to issuance of building
permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair contribution for area wide
improvements.
2) Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Elm and Spruce
Avenues.
b) The circulation design features conform with City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Division Street Design and Intersection Line of Sight policies. NO
I M PACT.
c) The project has adequate emergency access. NO IMPACT.
e) The required street frontage improvements will include sidewalks and/or bike lanes
in accordance with the Terra Vista Community Plan. NO IMPACT.
f) The required street frontage improvements include a bus turnout. NO IMPACT.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., hedtage trees,
eucalyptus windrew, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, ripadan, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
The project site was graded as a "super pad" in 1984. No structures, trees, or other
significant vegetation remain on the site.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 9
Impacl Lesl
8. ENERGY AND MINE~L RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Confli~ with adopted energy consedation
plans? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable msour~s in a wasteful and
inefficient manne~ ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral msour~ that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) (X)
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A dsk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 10
Comments.'.
a) The pdmary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation corridors.
Traffic along Church Street, Elm Avenue, and Spruce Avenue is the predominant
source contdbuting to the ambient noise level in the area. A Noise Impact Study
was performed for the proposed project by LSA Associates dated May 3, 1999. The
ambient noise levels range from 57.5 to 63.5 dBA, Leq (A-weighted sound level,
Equivalent Continuous Noise Level). Increases in noise levels could result from
project related traffic on roads that provide access to the site. Project related long-
term vehicular trip increases are anticipated to be moderate. The incremental traffic
noise level increases would be less than significant (LSA, May 1999).
b) The proposed on-site residential dwellings would be exposed to traffic noise level
potential exceeding 60 dBA, Ldn (A-weighted sound level, Day/Night noise level)
standard in outdoor activity areas. Mitigation measures will be required. The
project proponent will be required to:
t ) Provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) for all dwelling
units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) Provide building facade upgrades, such as double-paned windows and
weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling units which face Church
Street.
3) Provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the second floor balconies for
all dwelling units facing the perimeter streets.
With the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, the potential noise
impacts would be reduced to below the level of significance (LSA, May 1999).
'11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 11
Comments:
c) The project site is within the attendance boundaries of the Etiwanda School District
and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Both Districts have previously
entered into mitigation agreements for the entire Terra Vista Planned Community
and have formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distdct (CFD) to fund school
facilities. In addition, school impact fees are regulated by the State of California
Government Code Section 65995 et seq., wherein the City is prohibited from
denying the project based upon the adequacy of school facilities. The project site
is within walking distance of the Coyote Canyon Elementary School and the Ruth
Musser Middle School. The project proponent will be required to join the Mello-Roos
CFD; therefore, the impact would be reduced to below the level of significance.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
e) The project will not result in a need for new storm drains or substantial alterations
to the master plan storm drainage. NO IMPACT.
t 3. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affe~ a s~nic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effe~? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 1 ?
Comments:
c) Development of the proposed project will result in additional sources of light and
glare in the community. This impact is similar to existing development in the area
and would not result in a significant impact.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Restdct existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
· regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The proposed project will increase the demand for developed parkland in the Terra
Vista Community. The project is located immediately south of the Existing Spruce
Avenue Park, and in addition, will include conditions of approval for the development
of La Mission Park (located eastedy of the project site). These park facilities are
intended to serve the needs of residents of the proposed project, as well as the
requirement established by the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 16000/Design Review 99-13 Page 13
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
pedods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively bdef, definitive pedod of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an eadier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis. The following
eadier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Ddve (check all that apply):
(1) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
8G/23/1999 13:49 9099496725 LEWIS OPERATING CORP PAGE 82
Inilial Study for ' ' City of R~ncho Cu~
T~-~-'~ Tmc~ l~Vn Review ~-i3 P.ge 14
{2) Ma~tarEnviro~Asselw~entfo~ffie1989Gef~ralPl~tL~"
(SCH ~V880201 ( 5, certified Jmnusry 4,
{3) ' Term V~da P~rmed Comm~it~ E|R '
(BCH 181082808. certified Fm~rumy 16, 1983)
APPLICANT CERTIRCATION
I c~rtify Ihat I am the eppkant fo~ the I~ cleecdoed in thta Inil~l Study. I ackno~ that I
have mad this Init~l Sludy end the proposed mlt~ rnea~um~. Fudher. I have reviewed the
Ixojed plans Folx~d~ ~ r h~rmby e~me to ~e proposed mtf~e~,,~ me~a4~e~ to m/old the
e~ffe~ or mlti the effects t e point where alearty no iOnimam env~r0~tmenml effect~ would
LtqNALV~3COMM~NVOO~m6000.tt~d
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quafity Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Pubtic Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16000 & Design Review 99-13
Public Review Period Closes: July 14, 1999
Project Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Apartment Communities
Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The
site boundary is formed by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue.
Project Description: A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 6 lots for condominium purposes;
along with Design Review of 306 apartment units. Existing Terra Vista Community Plan land use
designation is High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), proposed development density is within
the Medium High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1077-421-55 and 60.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-~847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.16000, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF
16 ACRES OF LAND INTO 6 LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN
THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH
DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM
AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND 60.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application forthe approval of Tentative Tract
Map No. 16000, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission durin9 the above-
referenced public hearing on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Church Street, East Elm Avenue,
and Spruce Avenue, and is presently a vineyard on-site; all perimeter streets are improved with
curb, gutter and pavement.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existin9
Terra Vista Business Park; and
c. The project proposes 6 lots for condominium purposes; and
d. The project site is subject to noise levels of 65 CNEL along Church Street and can
be mitigated to acceptable levels per the Noise Study prepared for the project; and
e. The project will generate traffic trips which can be accommodated through public
street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'I'I' 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
f. The project is consistent with the General Plan Medium-High density residential
land use designation (14-24 dwelling units per acre) with a proposed project density of 19.36
dwelling units per acre.
g. The proposed project of 306 multi-family residential dwellings is in accord with the
objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Medium-High Residential district. In
addition, the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan.
h. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the
Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building
separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report,
i. The proposed project and the intended use. together with all conditions of approval
will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity, The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway
improvements adjacent to the site, as well as install a traffic signal at the intersection of Elm Avenue
and Spruce Avenue.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated theraunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
~ Division
1 ) The six-lot subdivision, Tentative Tract Map No. 16000, and Development Review
99-13 are being processed concurrently by the property owner. The tract map
shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit.
2) Complete missing street improvements fronting and adjacent to the project site on
Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and East Elm Avenue including, but not limited to,
sidewalk, driveways, median island landscaping on Church Street, street trees,
and streetlights. Protect existing traffic stripping and signage, including R 26(s)
"No Stopping any Time" signs on Spruce and Church frontages.
3) Install a traffic signal at Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue.
4) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed pdor to issuance of building
permits for the 13th apartment building within the project. The park design,
including grading, shall be subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation
Commission, prior to final map approval.
5) To reflect new or relocated improvements, existing street improvement plan No.
1306, 1342, 1449. and 1522-L shall be revised and/or new plans prepared by a
registered civil engineer. Plan check fees will be required.
6) Coordinate with Cucamonga School District on bus stop locations and "Suggested
Route to School" maps.
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to issuance of
building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair contribution for area-wide
improvements.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
2) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Elm and
Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
1 ) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) for all
dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-paned
windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling units which face
Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the second floor
balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter streets.
AIR QUALITY
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site
based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction
Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that
all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electdc or diesel-powered equipment in
lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include
astatementthatworkcrewswillshutoffequipmentwhennotinuse. Duringsmog
season (May through October), the overall length of the construction pedod should
be extended; thereby, decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to
minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage dde-shadng and transit
incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to
a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut
or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent
dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities
cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep
all areas of vehicle movement dam p enough to prevent dust from leaving the
site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later
morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind
exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the entire
area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until
the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not
occur.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 16000 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris
to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated natural
colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and coating transfer
or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure
(HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand
roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A']'I'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16000
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the odginal authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Tentative Tract 16000
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate wdtten approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 16000 (Related file: Development Review 99-13)
SUBJECT: 306 Apartment Units
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Avenue and West Elm Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477°2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion. participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not ralie,.~e applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval. and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
Co Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program. and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Project NO, ~'16000
Completion Date
2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not Commence until such time as aii Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be '
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
__/.___/
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / /
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
D. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /.__/
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $. 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guarenteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner pdor to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE W1TH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
E. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. .__/ /
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by __/__/
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of / /
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
sc -6/~4i99 2
Project NO. TT16000
Completion Date
F. Street Improvements
1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Curb & A.C, Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
E. Elm Avenue v' / / e
Church Street
Spruce Avenue v' / ,/
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) R26 "No Parkinq Anytime" siqns .
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and appruved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
( 1 ) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project No TT16000
Completion Date
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /
installed to Cty Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. /.__./
3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /
accordance with the City's street tree program. ''
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
G. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/__/
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
H. Utilities
1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /.__/
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Envjronmental Health Department ofthe County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
I. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covedng the estimated operating costs for all
new street fights for the first six months of operation, pdor to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute, PER 91 UFC Appendix Eli-A. 3, (b)
(Increase)
a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel pdor to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
sc - 6z~ 4~99
Project No, 'Fr16000
Completion Date
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants,
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2~1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final
inspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
/ Other: As per NFPA 13.
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
6. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of
sprinkler system.
7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct Ordinance 15.
/ California Code Regulations Title 24.
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted:
/ All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct Ordinance 22.
Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must be
submitted.
10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus.
11. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire Distdct standards.
12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet,
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
v' Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s).
14. Gated/restdcted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
Project No. TT16000
Completion Date
15. $132.00 Fire District be(s), $677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be / /
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
16 Plans shall be submitted and appreved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, / /
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 99-13, IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (14-24 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED BY
CHURCH STREET, EAST ELM AVENUE, AND SPRUCE AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-55 AND 60.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Apartment Communities has filed an application for the approval of Development
Review No. 99-13, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property bounded by Spruce Avenue, Church Street, and
East Elm Avenue, and is presently a vineyard. The perimeter streets are improved with curb, gutter,
and pavement; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Spruce Avenue Park and an
apartment community (Tract 12673), the property to the south consists of vacant land and Town
Center Square, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is the existing
Terra Vista Business Park; and
c. The project is located within the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per
acre); however, the proposed density of 19 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium-High
Residential Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This
flexibility is allowed in the Tetra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the
Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium-High District will apply to the
proposed development.
~PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and. further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlib resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 3
Plannin.q Division
1) All pertinent conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval for
Tentative Tract 16000 shall apply.
2) Provide enhanced paving material at the gated entry areas as depicted
on the approved conceptual landscape plan. Enhanced paving
surfaces shall also be used in the area in front of the gareges,
3) Berm the street scape landscaping along any perimeter wall for a
maximum exposed wall height of 6 feet from finished surface along the
streetscape.
4) All retaining walls used throughout the project shall be decorative
surface to compliment the building design.
5) Provide a reduced set (approximately 11 inches X 17inches) of the
entire development plan for Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
6) Provide revised Terre Vista Illustrative Master Plan (i.e., full size
blueprint) to include the subject project for Planning Division records,
prior to plan check to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
7) The garage entrance depths will be dimensioned at either less than 8
feet, or greater than 18 feet. Less than 18 feet requires an automatic
door opener.
8) The architectural treatment (pattern and color) of the garage doors
shall vary by pairs.
9) Recreational amenities (and the related points given) in accordance
with Development Code Section 17.08.040.H are as follows:
Recreation Building (1); pool/spa (1); outdoor entertainment area and
media center located at the Leasing Pavilion (1); spa/courtyard (1);
three large open lawn areas (3); BBQ nodes located throughout the
project (2); and a single expanded tot lot with multiple play equipment
(approximately 40 feet X 60 feet in area) (1) = 10 TOTAL amenities.
10) Redesign elevations, as necessary, to comply with recommendations
of noise study for sound attenuation purposes.
Englneerinq Division
1 ) La Mission Park site improvements shall be installed prior to issuance
of building permits for the 13th apartment building within the project.
The park design, including grading, shall be subject to approval by the
Parks and Recreation Commission, pdor to final map approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 4
Environmental Miti.qation Measures
TRANSPORTATION
1) The developer shall pay transportation development fees prior to
issuance of building permits, at the rate adopted by the City, as fair
contribution for area-wide improvements.
2) The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East
Elm and Spruce Avenues.
NOISE
1) The developer shall provide mechanical ventilation (air conditioning
system) for all dwelling units facing the project perimeter streets.
2) The developer shall provide building facade upgrades such as double-
paned windows and weatherstripping seals, for all rooms in dwelling
units which face Church Street.
3) The developer shall provide a 5-foot high sound barrier along the
second floor balconies for all dwelling units facing the perimeter
streets.
AIR QUALITY
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall
length of the construction pedod should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities cease.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-13 - LEWIS APT. COMM.
July 14, 1999
Page 5
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing. grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed;
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so
that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiledformorethantwodaysshallbecovered, keptmoist,
or treated with soil bindere to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debds to or from the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller,
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Design Review 99-13
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. Th is program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Ddve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
'Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project No. Design Review 99-13
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitodn9 will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director pdor to the issuance of building permits.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-13
SUBJECT: 306 Apartments (related file Tentative Tract 16000)
APPLICANT: Lewis Apartment Communities
LOCATION: NEC Church Street and West Elm Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval. or in the alternative.
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officere, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, offcam, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 yeare from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, the Terra VistaCommunity Plan.
SC * 6/14P99
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
__/.__/
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/ /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. '
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, '
building. etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, .~./.~_/
all other applicable C ty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan. including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / /
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pdor to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shieldin9 so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required end shall meet City standards. The final design. locations, and / /
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or mason~ walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction ofthe City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __ __/
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pdor
to the issuance of building permits.
12. For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the /
Development Code. -- --
13. For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of extedor lockable storage space /
shall be provided.
14. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the /
Development Code.
Project No DR99-13
Completion Date
Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propedies and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shaft be amhitecturelly integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4. All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be stdped per City standards.
5. All units shall be provided with garage door openere if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth
from back of sidewalk.
6. Plans for any secudty gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-areund space
in front of the 9ate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percant of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the firat
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of
the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle
storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a
minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required
exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off
to the higher whole number.
F. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided
within the project: 5 % - 48-inch box or larger 5 % - 36-inch box or larger, 20 % - 24- inch
box or larger, 70 % - 15-gallon, and 0 % - 5 gallon.
SC - 6t14/99 3
Project No. DR 99-13
Completion Date
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / /
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. '
4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /
tree per 30 linear feet of building. --
5. A~lprivates~~pes~f5feet~rm~reinvertica~heightand~f5:1~rgreatersl~pe~but~essthan2:~ / /
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion '
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / /
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as ~
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area. and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible / /
for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted ' '
areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and
debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,
fertilizing, mowing. and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall
be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
8. The final design of the perimeter parkways. walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / /
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right--of-way on the / /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. ~ '
10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / /
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. ~ ~
11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / /
Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to installation of any signs.
2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes pdor __/ /
to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior
to issuance of building permits.
Project NO. DR 99-13
Completion Date
Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the __/___
issuance of building permits. The finat report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of __/___
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash. letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guarantaeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
I. Other Agencies
1. Theapp~icantsha~~C~ntacttheU~S~P~sta~Servicet~determinetheappr~priatatypeand~~cati~n __/____
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets. detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'i-r #, cup #, DR #. etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
sc- e~4r99 5
Project No DR 99-13
Completion Date
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /
Building and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and appmved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electdc Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances.
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to /
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide
a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tractJparcel map recordation and /
prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / /
counter).
6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department / /
for approval.
L. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). __/ /
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufecturer's "high wind" instructions. / /
4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table /
5-A.
5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. /
6. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." /
SC - 6/14/99 6
Project No DR 99-13
Completion Date
7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A
6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A.
9. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the
construction type shall be V-1 Hour.
10. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour
fire-resistive construction.
11. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906.
12. Provide method of airborne and impact sound transmission control between dwelling units.
13. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed.
M. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be praparad by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by
deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building
permits, where no map is involved.
3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
SC_6/14/99 7
Project No DR99-13
Completion Date
O. Street Improvements
1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
E. Elm Avenue / / / e
Church Street ,/ ,/ /
Spruce Avenue / ,/ ,/
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) R26 "No Parkin.q Anytime" siqns.
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping. marking, traffic signing. street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduitwith pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations appreved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
( 1 ) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e.Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with /
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Project No ,DR gg-13
Completion Date
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
3.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shaft be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
P. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
Q. Utilities
1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCVVD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be 2500 gallons per minute Per 91 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3. (b)
(Increase)
a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
SC -6/14/99 g
Project No. DR 99-13
,Completion Date
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants sha be installed, flushed
.~/~/
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / /
submitted to the Fire Distdct that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for alJ hydrants and installed prior to final / /
inspection. --
6. An automatic fire extinguishin9 system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as
woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled
stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is
adequate for proposed operations.
7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of / /
sprinkler system.
8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct Ordinance 15. /
/ California Code Regulations Title 24. /
9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: /
~' All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct Ordinance 22. /
/ Access must be provided as per Ordinance 22 or application for alternative method must /
be submitted.
10. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. /
11. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided. and maintained free and clear /
of obstructions at all times during construction. in accordance with Fire District requirements.
12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept tdmmed to a minimum of 14 feet. /
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
13. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
v' Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s).
sc- r~ 4m 10
Project No. DR99-13
Completion Date
14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
15. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety
Division for the proper form letter.
16. $132.00 Fire District fee(s),$677.00 Builders fee, and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be
due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit
issuance. **
A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Lighting
1. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.
U. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.
2. One-inchsinglecylinderdeadboltsshafibeinstalledonallentrancedoors. Ifwindowsarewithin
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
V. Security Fencing
1. When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system secudty device shall be used since
fire and law enforcement can access these devices.
W. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be litted
from frame or track in any manner.
X. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
so-e~4m 11
Project No. DR99-13
Completion Date
2. At the entrances of complex. an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with / /
vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address
numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so
indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign
Permit and approval by the Planning Division.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ~
STAFF RF, PORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX - The development of a fast
food restaurant building totaling 2,478 square feet on a 0.75 acre parcel within a
proposed shopping center in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-21. Related file: Conditional Use Permit
97-19.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surroundin,q Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Vacant, proposed shopping center; Community Commercial Distdct (Subarea 2) of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
South- Vacant, proposed shopping center; Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
East Vacant, proposed shopping center; Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
West Vacant, proposed shopping center; Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
B. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Commercial
North Commercial
South- Commercial
East Commercial
West Commercial
Site Characteristics: The project site consists of a 0.75 acre pad within a 9.82 commercial
center approved for development at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard
Avenue. That project site was approved under Conditional Use Permit 97-19 which proposes
the development of a 68,355 square foot supermarket, two satellite buildings totaling 5,000
square feet each, with two drive-thru pads totaling 3,500 square feet and 2,500 square feet.
The project site and the surrounding commercial center are currently vacant, and all
previously existing buildings located on the project site have been demolished. The
commercial center is bounded by Cucamonga Creek to the west, by two apartment buildings
on San Bernardino Road to the north, Vineyard Avenue to the east, and FoOthill Boulevard
to the south.
TT]E;M ~T
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR-99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Parkinq Calculations: Parking for the entire commercial center was designed according to
Section 17.12.040(B)( 1 )(b)( 1 ) of the Development Code which requires 5 parking spaces for
each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Based upon the project square footage
and required parking ratio, the complex was designed to comply with, and far exceed, the
required number of parking spaces. In the following table the proposed drive-thru restaurant
square footage was included within the total square footage of the shopping center.
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided
Shopping Center 84,355 1/200 422 473
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed project will occupy one of the drive-thru pads approved with the
application to develop the 1 O-acre shopping center site at the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue (see Exhibit "B"). The drive-thru restaurant pad was
designed to reflect the architectural characteristics of the proposed supermarket by utilizing
such elements as: a stucco exterior, clay tile roof and exposed rafter tails on the tower
elements, river rock veneer stone columns, and wood trellis (see Exhibit "E").
B. Desiqn Review Committee: On June 15, 1999, the Design Review Committee (McNiel,
Stewart, Henderson) reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the
following:
1. Extend the use of the river rock veneer to include wainscoting on the boxed out columns
on all elevations.
2. Revise the design of the drive-thru aisle screen wall to include a river reck veneer.
Provide river rock veneer to the side of the wall subject to public view. The side of the
wall adjacent to the drive-thru shall be provided a stucco finish to match the building.
The design of the wall shall include a decorative cap.
3. Provide undulated berming to the landscaped area to the west of the restaurant.
Grading and project development shall not impact landscaping improvements proposed
with the shopping center development.
4. Expand the planter area between the screen wall and the drive-thru aisle, west of the
restaurant, to a minimum of 5 feet wide.
5. Provide a stop sign to control the exiting of the drive-thru aisle into the adjacent parking
lot drive aisle.
6. Special decorative paving used for the entire pedestrian sidewalk system shall be
consistent with the approved Master Plan. This includes both the enhanced paving
adjacent to the building and across the drive-thru aisle.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR-99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX
July 14, 1999
Page 3
7. The trash enclosure shall be designed for compatibility with the City Standard Drawing.
8. All signs shall be designed to comply with the center's Uniform Sign Program.
C. Environmental Assessment: The project site is part of a larger shopping center complex that
was approved for the project site under Conditional Use Permit 97-19. The Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared as part of that approval addressed, analyzed, and mitigated total project
site impacts relating to Cultural Resources, Noise, Geotechnical, Traffic, Water, Light and
Glare, and Tree Removal. No further environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsapprovalofDevelopmentReview99-12throughadoption
of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
City Planner
BB:TG:taa
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Elevations and Floor Plan
Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Comments
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
e~_ APPLICANT:
~ i SITE DATA:
,,,..,; ~'77 f%~ ............i== ='
' ~ -~-,- --.~ ......
....
I ,I ,1 ,I I Il!l! ! .! II I~1~1 n~,t~
DETAIL "A" ~
4' RIBB~ AREA 3-FT r t
'~ ..... ~ ........... ~ : I ~
SECTION A-A ' ' ' '
SECTION B'B E L E V A T I 0 N
~ ~"¢* EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
SECTION A-A E A S T E L E V A T I O N ,~,,~ .... .., o. )
OVERALL FLOOR PLAN
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m. Tom Grahn June 15, 1999
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX - The development of a fast food restaurant
building totaling 2,478 square feet on a 0.75 acre parcel within a proposed shopping center in the
Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the
north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Vineyard Avenue, APN: 207-207-102-21. Related file:
Conditional Use Permit 97-19.
' Desiqn Parameters: The propose project will occupy one of the drive-thru pads approved with the
application to develop the 10 acre site at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard
Avenue. The shopping center was approved under Conditional Use Permit 97-19 Ihat created a
Master Plan for the development of this site. That Master Plan included a 68,355 square foot
supermarket, two satellite buildings totaling 5,000 square feet each, and two drive-/hru pads
totaling 2,500 and 3,500 square feet. The Master Plan addressed conceptual building locations,
overall circulation, access points, parking layout, and provided conceptual elevations to establish
an architectural style, and the form, bulk, and height of certain architectural elements. The master
Conditional Use Permit was approved in 1997, and has completed plan checking, but has yet to
begin any construction.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. There are no major design issues as the project was designed to complement the design
of the proposed shopping center.
Secondary Issues: The Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Extend the use of the river rock veneer to include wainscoting on the boxed out columns
on all elevations.
2. Revise the design of the drive-thru aisle screen wall to include a river rock veneer.
3. The landscaped area to the west of the restaurant should be revised to include undulated
berming.
4. Special decorative paving should be used for the entire pedestrian sidewalk system.
consistent with the approved Master Plan. Including both the enhanced paving adjacent
to the building and across the drive-thru aisle.
Policy Issues: The following lieins are a matler of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. The trash enclosure shall be designed for compatibility with the City Standard Drawing.
2. All signs shall be designed to comply with the centers Uniform Sign Program.
F-,xm , T "f '
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-12-JACK IN THE BOX
June 15.1999
Page 2
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the project as revised with the above recommendations.
pesiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart. Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Tom Grahn
The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following:
1. Extend the use of the river rock veneer to include wainscoting on the boxed out columns
on all elevations.
2. Revise the design of the drive-thru aisle screen wall to include a river rock veneer. Provide
river rock veneer to the side of the wall subject to public view. The side of the wall adjacent
to the drive-thru shall be provided a stucco finish to match the building. The design of the
wall shall include a decorative cap.
3, Provide undulated berming to the landscaped area to the west of the restaurant. Grading
and project development shall not impact landscaping improvements proposed with the
shopping center development.
4. Expand the planter area between the screen wall and the ddve-lhru aisle, west of the
restaurant, to a minimum of 5 feet wide.
5. Provide a stop sign to control the exiting of the ddve-thru aisle into the adjacent parking lot
drive aisle.
6. Special decorative paving used for the entire pedestrian sidewalk system shall be
consistent with the approved Master Plan. This includes both the enhanced paving
adjacent to the building and across the ddve-lhru aisle.
7. The trash enclosure shall be designed for compatibility with the City Standard Drawing.
8. All signs shall be designed to comply with the centers Uniform Sign Program.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 99-12, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FAST FOOD
RESTAURANT BUILDING TOTALING 2,478 SQUARE FEET ON A 0.75
ACRE PARCEL WITHIN A PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF VINEYARD
AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-102-21.
A. Recitals.
1. Jack in the Box has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No.
99-12, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meetin9 on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced meeting on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
west of Vineyard Avenue with a street frontage of 163.83 feet alon9 Foothill Boulevard and lot depth
of 232.58 feet and is presently vacant; and
b. The properties to the north, east, and west of the subject site are currently vacant;
however, they are located within a master plan for an approved commercial center, the property to
the south is vacant; and
c. The application contemplates the development of a 2,478 square foot ddve-thru
restaurant on a pad designated for ddve-thru use within an approved shopping center (Conditional
Use Permit 97-19).
,3'/5'
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX
July 14, 1999
Page 2
d. The design of the proposed project, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto,
meets all applicable provisions of the Development Code, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and
drive-thru policies; and
e. The project site is located within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2)
of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b, That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code,
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below
and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
1 ) Extend the use of the river rock veneer to include wainscoting on the
boxed out columns on all elevations.
2) Revise the design of the ddve-thru aisle screen wall to include a river
rock veneer. Provide river rock veneer to the side of the wall subject
to public view. The side of the wall adjacent to the drive-thru shall be
provided a stucco finish to match the building. The design of the wall
shall include a decorative cap.
3) Provide undulated berming to the landscaped area to the west of the
restaurant. Grading and project development shall not impact
landscaping improvements proposed within the shopping center
development.
4)Expand the planter area between the screen wall and the drive-thru
aisle, west of the restaurant, to a minimum of 5 feet wide.
5) Provide a stop sign to control the exiting of the drive-thru aisle into the
adjacent parking lot drive aisle.
,_..?'/
.PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-12 - JACK IN THE BOX
July 14, 1999
Page 3
6) Special decorative pavin9 used for the entire pedestrian sidewalk
system shall be consistent with the approved Master Plan. This
includes both the enhanced paving adjacent to the building and across
the drive-thru aisle.
7) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit 97-19 shall apply.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-12
SUBJECT: Jack in the Box
APPLICANT:
LOCATION: North side of Foothill BoulevardI West of Vineyard Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __ __/__
agents. officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, off'~cers, or
employees. for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit. Variance, or DevelopmentJDesign Review approval shall expire if /
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /
site plans. architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors. landscaping, sign program. and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
Project No. DR 99-12
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .__/.___/
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/orlandscapingtothesatisfactionoftheCity Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10.All building numbera and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
11. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock, Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Shopping Centera
1. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design to match the shopping center. including seating
benches. trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards. etc., shall be
utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for
Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City
Planner:
a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project).
b. Separate pedestdan access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to
include self-closing pedestrian doors.
Project No, DR 99-12
Completion Date
c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins.
d. Roll-up doors.
e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids.
f. Architecturafiy treated overhead shade trellis.
g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed
to be hidden from view.
3. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. only.
4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and
debris remain for more than 24 hours.
6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only."
7. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which
shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants:
a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an
exterior noise level of 60 dB dudng the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB dudng the
hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m.
b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing,
or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other
similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein,
in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.
8. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestdan walkway, and plaza.
They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate. integral color concrete, or any combination
thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza
area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures.
E. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main
building colors.
SC -6/14/99 3
c
Project NO DR 99-12
Completion Date
F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. Textured pedestdan pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4.All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles. entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall. whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
G. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan. including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. A minimum of 30% trees planted within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size
trees - 24-inch box or larger.
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
5. All pdvate slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with apprepdate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
6. All pdvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. ofslope area, 1-cJallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition. slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pdor to occupancy.
7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
SC-6/14/99 4
Project No. DR 99-12
Completion Date
8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering /
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill
Boulevard.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the __
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. ~ ~ /
11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
H. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this shopping center shall be submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
J. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: __1 /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping. and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'I']' #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) cleady identified on the
outside of all plans.
SC -6/14/99
Project No. DR 99-12
Completion Date
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
__/ /
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage / /
to the City prior to permit issuance. -- ~
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /
Building and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements. and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Pdor to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition / /
to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.
Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee,
School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees
receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, pdor to issuance of building permits. / /
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public
counter).
L. New Structures
1. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturers "high wind" instructions.
2. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bemardino Environmental
Health Services prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table
5-A.
4. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls.
5. Roofing materials shall be Class "A."
6. Extedor walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A
7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A.
8. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906.
SC - 6/14~S9 6
Project No. DR99-12
Completion Date
9. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / /
Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / /
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /
perform such work. ' '
3. The final grading plans shall be Completed and approved prior to issuance of buildin9 permits. / /
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / /
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Mello Roos Community Facilities Distdct requirements shall apply to this project. The developer __/ /
shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or
consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) forthe Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the
development. The CFD shall be formed by the Distdct and the developer by the time recordation
of the final map occurs.
2. Fire flow requirement shall be 2000 gallons per minute. /
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __ __/
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall__ __/
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __ __/
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __ __/__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
5. Hydrant reflective markere (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final __ __/
inspection.
Project No DR 99-12
~;ompletion Date
6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufactur ng, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of / /
sprinkler system. ~
8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. /.__/
,/ California Code Regulations Title 24. /
9. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall /
be submitted pdor to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
10. $132.00 and $ 677.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to /
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. **
A Fire Distdct fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal.
**Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
11. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, /
UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
O. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power.
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sundse and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
3. Lighting in extedor areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.
P. Security Hardware
1.One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
Project No. DR 99-12
Completion Date
3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates,
or alarmed.
Windows
1. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic.
R. Building Numbering
1.Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be
a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background.
The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department.
S, Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in
turn save dollars and lives.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 14, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION 99-02 - RAY'S BAIL BONDS - A request to determine that
a bail bond business is similar to Clerical and Professional Services, which is a
permitted use within the General Commercial District of the Development Code.
BACKGROUND: InAPri11999, staffreceived afive-page petition, containing overa100signatures,
from residents around the Arrow Plaza Mall, at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald
Avenue, objecting to a proposed bail bond business (Exhibit "B"). Staff was not aware of the
proposed business at that time because the City had not received a business license request;
therefore, staff contacted the property owner, Krikor Dersarkisisan, informed him that a bail bond
business is not listed as a permitted use in his shopping center, and advised him that a Use
Determination would be required if the use was pursued for his center. On May 27, 1999, the
applicant submitted such a request. Exhibit "A" is a detailed description of the bail bond business.
ANALYSIS:
A. Current Codes: The Development Code, Foothill and Etiwanda Specific Plans, and Term
Vista and Victoda Community Plans do not list bail bond at all. In 1993, the Planning
Commission determined that a bail bond business is under the category of Personal Services
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP). Exhibit "C" shows the Land Use matrix of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan and a map that shows the subareas that will allow bail bond
business.
B. Description of Proposed Bail Bond Busines.~' According to the applicant, they provide surety
bail bonds for their clients that are in need of release from jail custody. The spectrum of
customers coming to their office are generally relatives or fdends of their clients trying to
secure the surety bail bonds for their release from jail. They also provide Notary Public
service for the general public. The daily operations include contract negotiations, delivery of
bonds to courts and jails, case studies and investigations at courts, motion preparation and
delivery, and general office paperwork and filing. The proposed hours of operation are
between 8 a.m. and 12 midnight. They will have three employees and anticipate a maximum
of 30 clients per day.
C. Description of Clerical and Professional Services: The Development Code does not have a
definition on Cledcal and Professional Service. Staff interpreted that this use applies to
general cledcal services such as temp services, and professional services such as attorneys,
accountants, architects, engineers, interior designers, advertising, and similar professionals.
The use category of Cledcal and Professional Services is permitted in the Office Professional,
Neighborhood Commercial, and General Commercial zones.
ITEM K
"PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
UD 99-02 - RAY'S BAIL BONDS
July 14, 1999
Page 2
D. Is Bail Bond Business Similar to Clerical and Professional Services?: Based on comparing
the description of a bail bond business and the types of businesses under the use category
of Clerical and Professional Services, staff believes that many of the business functions such
as preparing paperwork for contracts, filing, performing case studies and investigations at
courts are similar to the functions of an attorney and accountant offices, etc. A difference
between the two uses is that the clerical or professional services would mostly likely be closed
by 6 p.m. versus 12 midnight or later for bail bond businesses.
E. Options for Commission to Consider:
1. Determine that bail bond businesses are not similar to Cledcal and Professional
Services and direct the applicant to add "Bail Bond" as a conditionally permitted use in
the General Commercial Zone through a Development Code Amendment.
Staff Comment: Amending the Development Code to conditionally allow this type of
business in the General Commercial zone would afford the City an opportunity to ensure
compatibility of use to surrounding neighborhoods and encourage public participation.
Only the Planning Commission or City Council can initiate such an amendment upon
receipt of an application.
2. Determine bail bond businesses to be within Cledcal and Professional Services. If the
Commission selects this option, a Resolution of Approval is provided for your
Convenience,
Staff Comment: This determination would expand the areas for bail bond businesses
from Industrial to Commercial and Office Zones. The question is whether bail bond
businesses will be a compatible use in a neighborhood shopping center.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item is not a public headng and notices are not required by law.
However, staff has mailed notices to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site
and the tenants within the shopping center, as a courtesy.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission initiate an amendment to the
Development Code to add Bail Bond as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial
Zone upon receipt of an application.
City Planner
BB:NF:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicent's Letter
Exhibit "B" - Petition Letters
Exhibit "C" - Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Matdx and Map
Exhibit "D" - Office Professional, Neighborhood, & General Commercial Zones
Resolution Approving Use Determination
Comn~unity Development Depatlment UNIFORM
~o5oo civic Center Drive A PPLICA TION
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(9O9) 4ZZ-2Z50 Part 1
Name of Proposed Project
Ra ' ;~(staffuse only) '."
y s Bail Bonds .RLENO.: .... ~',"
9755 Arrow Route, Suite E CA, 917]0 RELATEDRLES: "'
Legal Descnpt#on Of Plolect (Asse=sors Parcel NO.)
Appl~canl*~ Name / ~ ~T),/Tt'~T: Phone Number .' ( 909 ) 944-4855
5963 LaPlace Court, Suite 200, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ~ 7
Legal Owner~ Name Of dtffefen~ f/am above) Phone Number;
Quality Develcment Ccepany (818)705--4487
Addfe~,s
9755 "A" Arro~ Boute~ Sancho Cucamonga~ CA 91730
Type of Review Requested (Please Check All Applicable
rj CommunilyPlan Amendment Q Hillside Development >4 DU O Tentative Parcol Map
CJ Cond~lional Use Permit Q H#~side Development ~ 4 DU CJ Tentative Tract Map
Cond~lional Use Perm~l (J Landmark Alteration Permit ~ Use Delermination
(Non.Construct#on) ~ Lot bne Adjustment rj Vacal~on of Pubbc R~ghl-of-Way or
Dev/Design Review. Comm/Indus [J Minor Development Reviow Easement
~J Day/Design Review o Residential ~J Minor Exception Q Va~anco
~J Development Agroomonl ~J Pro-Applicat#on Review CI Other.
rj Dovoloprnont Dislnct Amendment rJ probrninat7 Review
rj Entorfa#nmenl Permit rJ 5poc~fic Ran Amendment
LI General Plan Amendment
DelalledDescrlPil°n°fProP°sedPraJecE(Ar~achAddlrl°nalShee~sffNecessarY) LiCenSed and bonded Bail Agents
all holding Notary Public ~m~s~ions providing surety bail bonds for clients in n~
of release from jail custody (said bonds ~mrenteeing the clients' full appearances in
court, until cases resolved), primarily servicing the West Valley Detention Center at
9500 Etiwanda Avenue, about 4 miles east of proposed office location, but not limited
to nationwide service. Client base supported by extensive yellow page advertisement and
referrals. Also providing Notry Public service for the general public in need of
notarial acts. Daily operations include contract negotiating,delivering bonds to courts
I certify that l am presently the legal owner of the above-described property. Further. l acknowledge the filing el lhis
application and certify tidal all of the abe ve information is Irue and correct. (If the undersigned is different from the legal
property owner. a letter of authorization must accompany tl~is form.)
' EXHIBIT "A" p... , ,,,.R...,p,.o.
'UD99-02 cx)
( cont. )
and jails, case studies and investigations at courts, motion preparation and delivery,
general office paperwork and filing.
Rancho Cucamonga General Commercail District classification; Clerical and professior~
offices
'~Ve the nnderslgned, hereby petition the City. of R~ncho Cueamonga, in the County or San
Bernardino, State of California Rt-~arding the followintO:
We request that the city revoke any business license that snay be grailted to the owuers/agenls of the
proposed Bail Bonds Office at the Arrow Plaza ,'Mall at
9755 Arrow Route. Suite E. Rancho Cucamon_oa. California. 9173~,
The above. mentioned Ihdl Bondv Office is in direct proximity to Cncamonga Elementary School,
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (with the numerous youth & senior services as well as a church
that meets there,) the missionary bible camp, and an after school youth progrant at the Uphmd
Assistance !.eagne.
!t is our concern that the clientele of the Bail !~mds Office listed above, and it's clientele would be a
danger to the young people in these schools, churches, and other programs, as well as the
surrounding residential community.
With this concern in mind, we the people of the surrounding residential eommnnity and the
business owners of the area request that a business license be revoked, and at least a public hearing
be granted on the re issuance of said license, where the members of this community help to decide if
this Bail Bands Office is righi for their neighborhood.
Witness Our lland:
i
.!
I
............. l ................. !
............. ~ ............................
EXHIBIT "B" a E O E I V E D
UD 99-02 ,pn 2- o
We the under~igned, hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamnnga, in the County of San
Bernardinn, State of California Regarding the following:
We request that the city revoke any business license that may be granted to the owuen/agcnts of the
proposed Bail Bonds Office at the Arrow Plaza Mall at '
9755 Arrow Route. Suite E. Rancho Curnmon_pa. California. 9|730.
The above mentioned Ball !~jnd~ Office is in direct proximity to Cucamonga Elementary School,
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (with the numerous youth & senior services as well as a church
that meets there,) the missionary bible camp, and an after school youth program at the Upland
Assistance League.
it is our concern that the clientele of the Bail Bonds Office listed above, and it*s clientele would be a
danger to the young people in these schools, churches, and other programs, as well as the
surrounding residential community.
With this concern in mind, we the people of the surrounding residential community and the
business ownen of the area request that a business license be revoked, and at least a public hearing
be granted on the re issuance of laid license, where the mereben of this community help to decide if
this Bail Bands Office is right for their neighborhood.
Witness Our Hand:
I
+ I..
~,,~.,~ C2 ,~..,.,rZZ,/~ ,L,,r, q~ q ~l~,~ ~f"Z-,,~(~ t~,
....
Wc the undersigned, hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in the County of San
Bcrnardino, State of Califon~ia Regarding the following;
Wc request that the city revoke any business license that may be granted to the owuers/agenta of the
proposed Bail Bonds Office at the Arrow Plaza ,'~lall at
9755 Arrow Route. Shire E. Rancho Cucamon~a. California. 9173Q.
The above mentioned flail IlontZs Office is in direct proximity to Cucamonga Elementary School,
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (with the numerous youth & senior services as well as a church
that meets there,) the missionary bible camp, and an after school youth program at the Upland
Assistance !,eague.
it is our concern that the clientHe of the Bail Bonds Office listed above, and it's clientele would be a
danger to the young people in these schools, churches, and other programs, as well as the
surrounding residential community.
With thL~ concern in mind, we the people of the surrounding residential community and the
business owners of the area requut that a busineas license be revoked, and at least a public beatring
be granted on the re issuance of sald license, where the members of this community help to decide if
this Bail Bonds Office is right for their neighborhood.
Witness Our Hand:
RECEIVED
City o! Ra. ncho Cucamon~a
p~anning Divii~on
We the undersigned, hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in Ihe County of San
Bernardino, State of California Regarding the following:
We request that the city revoke any business license that may be granled to the owners/ageuts of the
proposed BailBonds Office at the Arrow Plaza Mall at
9755 Arrow Route. Suite E. Rancho Cucamonpa. California, 91730.
The above mentioned Bail Bonds Office is in direct proximity to Cucamonga Elementary School,.
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (with the numerous youth & senior services as well as a church
that meets there,) the missionary bible camp, and an after school youth program at the Upland
Assistance League.
It is our concent that the clientele of the I~all Boeuls Office listed above, and it's clientele would be a
danger to the young people in these schools, churches, and other programs, as well as the
surrounding residential community.
With this concent in mind, we the people of the surrounding residential community and the
bttsiaess owners of the area request that a business license be revoked, and at least a public hearing
be granted on the re issuance of said license, where the members of this collldtT help to decide if
this Bail Bonds Offace is fight for their neighborhood.
Witness Our iland:
Name Printed Name S'~ned ~_d;,~pTr.~,.f
S + ~ ,'72~ -,q,q ~" /~//,f. d'~,t,S;/.../-.i </,'~.,~,,n,.,,L /.~,,, ("'.,,c4
C~,~Cy.~c.~t,~ ~/7<'~.'X ~,~.. r~(.~,f ~2~r~r~ [~ur ( t/crx c'71'~,~
/
R E C*E'I'V E D
APR ~. 6 1999
//~/'~)~ City o! Rancho Cucamonga
pza/u"~ I::)Nis~n
We the undersigued, hereby petition the Gty ofgancho Cucamonga, in the County of San
BePaardino, State of California Regarding the following:
We request that the city revoke any business license that may be granted to the owners/agents of the
proposed Ball Bonds Office at the Arrow Plaza Mall at
9755 Arrow Route. Suite E. Raneho Curamon~n. California. 91730.
The above mentioned !~aiI I~jn~ Office is in direct proximity to Cucnmonga Elementary School,
Rancho Cucnmonga Senior Center (with the numernus youth & senior services as well as a church
that meets there,) the missionary bible camp, and an after school youth program at the Upland
Assistance League.
It is our concern that the clientele of the Bail llonds Office listed above, and it's clientele would be a
danger to the young people in these schools, churches, and other progrnms, as well as the
surrounding residential community.
With this concern in mind, we the people of the surrounding residential community and the
business owners of the area request that a business license be revoked, and at least a public hearing
be granted on the re issuance of said license, where the members of this community help to decide if
this Bail Bonds Of Jl~ce is right ~borhood.
Witness Our Hand:
/Y/.,,.., '~r: }n~t.'O t'~,v'l::~'. e.e.. ,C.41 .ff/Z3d
RECEIVED
APR '2 6 1999
//~9 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Ranning Division
Industrial Area Specific Plan Part
~': TABLE II1-1 (
LAND USE IP GI El .~-IGIGI IP IP GI' VII/HIGI GI iPrbl GI HI IP IP MUIOS
USE TYPES
su~Rs~s
CC,M~Ir-RC|AL
~nimalCam C C C C C
~momot~e F~t Storage I C I J C I J C C P C C p
~omot~e~ight Tm~ Repair - Minor p p p p
~utomotive~m~ Repair- Major J P I C J P I I P P J C I C I C
Bui~ing Contra~o~. ~. & Ya~s p P P
BuildingC°ntm~ofsStomgeYaffi I IIllll
,.,a.g M.i.t..... s.~. I
Building & Light Equiprant Suppl~s & Sa~s
,..~... S.npo, S..~. p- p I C I P I P
co~...i.t,o. ~.~. p I p I p I P I P I P I p I P I P I pPp p
( Ente"ainmnt C
ClClI C
h"FO~S"~. C'lll iCl IClClCl C C II IC
Finan=a,. Insu=n~ aRea, Es,t, Se,i~s P I P I I P I P I I P I P IF I C C J C I I" P O
~&~-~g.s-,- c-lcl Iclcl Iclclcl c
"e.~ Equipment SalS &Rentals I C I C I C C
CM~ume~ Cam~i~L __
P P
,..i, s.~i.. I p I p I c I p I. . P p . I p I p I c I
IRes~umn~
PIPIll P P P PIll IP
Res~umn~ ~h Bar or Ente~inment
clclll cc ccl lll
Wamhous~S~ Retail Mer~andisinq
NO~S:
iP - Indust~al Pa~ P - Pe~ U~
HO - Haven Avenue ~eday D~tdd C - Cond~ional~ Pe~t~ U~
GI - ~neml Indus~al D - NomMa~ u~s not H~ t;~l~
Mi~l - Minimum Impa~ea~ Industrial A - Mu~ Ente~inmnt Zoning Pe~ R~ui~
. HI - Hea~ Indust~l - Refer to Haven Avenue ~e~y D~td~ for addi '
( MU/OS - M~ed Us~n S~
FOOTHILL
/ Figure III- 1
SUBAREAS
HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT
~INDUSTRIAL PARK
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
~MINIMUM IMPACT
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
MIXED USE
' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- -- · J I INDUSTRIAL AREA PLAN
9/07/88
~ II1- 6 10/03/g0
6117/97
/JP q'r; o 2,
:.-,,,
LEGEND
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USE
DETERMINATION 99-02, DETERMINING THAT BAIL BOND BUSINESSES
ARE SIMILAR TO CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND ARE
PERMI'I'I'ED IN THE APPLICABLE COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Ray's Bail Bonds has filed an application for the approval of Use Determination 99-02,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of July 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on July 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The use in question is of a similar nature, operation, and intensity as those
businesses such as accountants, attorneys, architects, and similar professionals classified under
Clerical and Professional Services.
b. The use in question meets the purpose and the intent of the district in which it is
proposed.
c. The use in question meets and conforms to the applicable goals and objectives of
the General plan.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this
Commission hereby approves Use Determination 99-02.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
UD 99-02 - RAY'S BAIL BONDS
July 14, 1999
Page 2
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: